ROL_2016-06-27_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli
[00:06.000 --> 00:08.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternatives.
[00:21.000 --> 00:28.000]  Markets for Friday, April 15, 2016 are currently treading with gold at $1,233.72 an ounce,
[00:28.000 --> 00:35.000]  silver at $16.21 an ounce, Texas crude at $40.36 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[00:35.000 --> 00:44.000]  sitting at about $430 U.S. currency.
[00:44.000 --> 00:51.000]  Today in history, the year 1865, Abraham Lincoln is shot at Ford's Theater in Washington, D.C.
[00:51.000 --> 00:57.000]  Honest Abe died today in history.
[00:57.000 --> 01:02.000]  In recent news, 22 Texas Republican district or county conventions passed resolutions calling
[01:02.000 --> 01:05.000]  for a vote on state secession in March.
[01:05.000 --> 01:09.000]  Though only 10 responded and actually validated the passage of such resolutions, an official
[01:09.000 --> 01:13.000]  count should be available from the Republican Party of Texas in early May.
[01:13.000 --> 01:17.000]  Last year, the Texas Nationalist Movement made headlines with a statewide tour of speaking
[01:17.000 --> 01:21.000]  events seeking enough signatures to get secession on the GOP primary ballot.
[01:21.000 --> 01:25.000]  Daniel Miller, the group's president, said that they came close, but not close enough.
[01:25.000 --> 01:30.000]  However, as a result, recruited and trained a lot of volunteers from Amarillo to San Antonio.
[01:30.000 --> 01:34.000]  Supporters of an independent Texas promote such efforts because of federal overreach,
[01:34.000 --> 01:38.000]  corruption, and excessive spending, not to mention the reality of Texas being large and
[01:38.000 --> 01:41.000]  economically independent enough to actually go it alone.
[01:41.000 --> 01:45.000]  And though the Supreme Court ruled in 1869 that states do not have the right to secede,
[01:45.000 --> 01:49.000]  secessionists are pointing out that these rulings will have no binding once the state
[01:49.000 --> 01:50.000]  declares independence.
[01:50.000 --> 01:54.000]  Federalists are warning that the federal government will be obligated to use force against such
[01:54.000 --> 01:58.000]  a move, since it would be considered rebellion under federal regulation.
[02:02.000 --> 02:06.000]  150 federal to state law enforcement from various agencies assisted the Seguin police
[02:06.000 --> 02:10.000]  department with dozens of arrest warrants targeting Mexican mafia operations trafficking
[02:10.000 --> 02:12.000]  heroin and cocaine into Seguin and Ubranfals.
[02:12.000 --> 02:16.000]  This mass-coordinated effort, 18 months in the planning, was set in motion when indictments
[02:16.000 --> 02:20.000]  unsealed Friday charged defendants with a conspiracy to possess and intent to distribute
[02:20.000 --> 02:21.000]  controlled substances.
[02:21.000 --> 02:25.000]  Authorities suspect those rounded up are responsible for distributing heroin, cocaine,
[02:25.000 --> 02:28.000]  and methamphetamine into Seguin and Ubranfals since 2010.
[02:28.000 --> 02:32.000]  The alleged leader of the mafia, a lieutenant, is among the people arrested.
[02:32.000 --> 02:35.000]  Police say that these networks supply drugs from Austin to Houston and are believed to
[02:35.000 --> 02:37.000]  even have ties within the Texas prison system.
[02:37.000 --> 02:41.000]  It does seem police have found themselves a cozy permanent job waging the drug war.
[02:41.000 --> 02:45.000]  Unfortunately, these indefinite efforts will continue to remain so because of the
[02:45.000 --> 02:49.000]  criminalization of drugs themselves, consequently bringing in cartels, violence,
[02:49.000 --> 02:52.000]  smuggling, and millions of tax dollars gone to waste.
[02:52.000 --> 03:20.000]  This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for April 15, 2016.
[03:20.000 --> 03:23.000]  This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for April 15, 2016.
[03:50.000 --> 03:52.000]  This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for April 15, 2016.
[04:20.000 --> 04:43.000]  All right, folks, it is June 27th, 2016.
[04:43.000 --> 04:47.600]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig, and I am
[04:47.600 --> 04:54.200]  trying to run all this here by myself tonight. My call screener is not here tonight. And
[04:54.200 --> 05:02.440]  I've been doing some research on a particular term, and that term is scumbag. Now the reason
[05:02.440 --> 05:08.720]  I bring this up at the beginning of the show is because the main reason that shows like
[05:08.720 --> 05:20.320]  rule of law exists is because we have to assist people in learning how to deal with society's
[05:20.320 --> 05:26.800]  scumbags. And I'm not talking about the ones defined by society as the criminal element
[05:26.800 --> 05:33.680]  in the majority of cases that we have, because those people aren't really criminals, except
[05:33.680 --> 05:41.240]  in the eyes of the system. Many of them have never harmed anyone, and yet they're having
[05:41.240 --> 05:49.440]  their money and life and properties stolen by the state. And it's always through the
[05:49.440 --> 05:57.320]  same mechanism, the courts. And it's always under the control of the same group of people,
[05:57.320 --> 06:03.720]  the attorneys. The attorneys control the courts as the defense. They control the courts as
[06:03.720 --> 06:12.400]  the prosecution. They control the courts as the judges. They control the courts as the
[06:12.400 --> 06:23.400]  people responsible for training, every one of those. They control the system by rewriting
[06:23.400 --> 06:31.160]  law to suit their own agenda or their own perspective, regardless of what the law says
[06:31.160 --> 06:37.960]  or where it conflicts with the very power that created them, the Constitution itself,
[06:37.960 --> 06:45.400]  state or federal. And I want to tell you what the actual definition of this term scumbag
[06:45.400 --> 06:56.880]  is, a contemptible or objectionable person. Okay? I can't think of a more apt description
[06:56.880 --> 07:04.600]  of most attorneys. And not because they're always bad people when you encounter them.
[07:04.600 --> 07:12.240]  They're very charming, witty, and entertaining attorneys. Don't get me wrong. Until it comes
[07:12.240 --> 07:21.920]  to who gets to have that almighty dollar. When it comes right down to it, the attorney
[07:21.920 --> 07:29.080]  is going to sacrifice you for his own benefit every time. And the few that haven't, haven't
[07:29.080 --> 07:35.120]  been able to remain attorneys. And the only question then is how long did it take them
[07:35.120 --> 07:39.880]  to be a scumbag before they realized they were a scumbag and quit or get out or fight
[07:39.880 --> 07:49.080]  back? Whatever their initial response to a corrupt system such as that that exists here
[07:49.080 --> 08:04.040]  actually was. We have allowed too many other people to tell us what everything means, what
[08:04.040 --> 08:10.120]  everything is worth, what we have a right to and what we don't have a right to.
[08:10.120 --> 08:17.360]  Now, I've talked about a book before that I read many years ago and I reread it occasionally.
[08:17.360 --> 08:25.300]  And it's not the world's greatest written novel. It is not with such a great plot line
[08:25.300 --> 08:35.560]  that it's an irresistible book. What makes this book appealing to me is the subject.
[08:35.560 --> 08:45.200]  And the subject is freedom under constitutional observation and obedience. And remember constitutional
[08:45.200 --> 08:50.980]  obedience isn't binding upon the people. We're not obedient to the constitution because
[08:50.980 --> 08:58.880]  it doesn't do anything to bind us to anything. But the government and everyone in it, that's
[08:58.880 --> 09:07.800]  a whole other story. The name of this book is Hope. And it was put out by a group called
[09:07.800 --> 09:12.480]  the Jews for the Preservation of Fire, for firearms or something to that effect. I don't
[09:12.480 --> 09:18.080]  remember the exact name of the group, but basically it was started. It's a bunch of
[09:18.080 --> 09:24.280]  Jewish folks that were never going to let a repeat of the disarming of the Jews and
[09:24.280 --> 09:27.440]  their destruction by Germany to ever occur again.
[09:27.440 --> 09:32.240]  They would rather fight back than remain docile. And they started an organization and they
[09:32.240 --> 09:40.320]  actually published several books. There's this book and several others. But this book
[09:40.320 --> 09:49.120]  begins with the premise that you have a self-made billionaire who has worked hard all of his
[09:49.120 --> 09:54.440]  life to build up a company from scratch with the woman that he married when he was younger.
[09:54.440 --> 09:59.920]  And she was basically the one that went out seeking all the new technologies as they were
[09:59.920 --> 10:05.380]  developed and found a way to market them. And he ran the company and made the deals
[10:05.380 --> 10:10.920]  and made his business successful. And he did it despite all of the government interference
[10:10.920 --> 10:18.120]  regulation and corruption that always is used to drain money from these corporations into
[10:18.120 --> 10:21.240]  the pockets of the politicians.
[10:21.240 --> 10:33.760]  Now this same business owner also had a background in his degree was in American history. And
[10:33.760 --> 10:38.240]  his favorite subject when he was studying that was the War of Independence with Great
[10:38.240 --> 10:45.320]  Britain and what it was all about. And as he became older, he maintained that air of
[10:45.320 --> 10:49.880]  freedom and respectability and everything as a constitutional republic, even while he
[10:49.880 --> 10:55.400]  was trying to build this big corporation. But he played the game to make the business
[10:55.400 --> 10:56.400]  successful.
[10:56.400 --> 11:03.240]  Well, finally, he decides that he's going to create an endowment at a university. And
[11:03.240 --> 11:08.960]  he sets the requirements of the and this is after his wife has passed away. He decided
[11:08.960 --> 11:18.440]  he's going to set the qualifications for the professor who is to teach under this endowment
[11:18.440 --> 11:26.880]  to basically fit only one person on the planet himself, his background, his personal net
[11:26.880 --> 11:35.040]  worth and his belief system as far as the constitutional republic and all that goes.
[11:35.040 --> 11:38.000]  And when he set up the qualifications with the university he was going to teach at, he
[11:38.000 --> 11:42.640]  made all that very clear that this is what the qualifications are. And then he went and
[11:42.640 --> 11:46.500]  applied for the job that he had created.
[11:46.500 --> 11:51.440]  And so he got it, of course. And through the course of this, he's teaching a bunch of young
[11:51.440 --> 11:56.560]  students about the Constitution and what it was like to live under British rule in those
[11:56.560 --> 12:02.440]  times. And some of the imagery he uses in this classroom is very straightforward.
[12:02.440 --> 12:07.360]  And for those people out there that are veterans of the Vietnam War, the Korean War that are
[12:07.360 --> 12:12.700]  still listening to things like this, you can relate to this in some ways because you would
[12:12.700 --> 12:18.120]  have seen some of this potentially while you were serving in areas like that.
[12:18.120 --> 12:26.720]  But he was talking about when the British soldiers were sent to America, they thought
[12:26.720 --> 12:33.740]  themselves superior to all of the colonists. As a British soldier, they were untouchable.
[12:33.740 --> 12:39.080]  You couldn't defend yourself against them. You couldn't do anything to disobey them.
[12:39.080 --> 12:45.960]  And if you did, they had the king's discretion to kill you on the spot. Okay?
[12:45.960 --> 12:54.880]  And in case you aren't making the equivalent of modern society today, we are talking about
[12:54.880 --> 13:00.600]  the British Army, as repugnant as it was to the colonists and as abusive as it was to
[13:00.600 --> 13:07.960]  the colonists, has now taken form in the police state in American police officers.
[13:07.960 --> 13:12.160]  They believe themselves to be entirely above the law and untouchable no matter what their
[13:12.160 --> 13:20.440]  actions, no matter how criminal those actions would be if perpetrated by anyone else.
[13:20.440 --> 13:30.520]  There is no crime so heinous that the courts will not allow the blue privilege to keep
[13:30.520 --> 13:37.280]  that officer from being held accountable. We've got rapists, we've got murderers, we've
[13:37.280 --> 13:45.000]  got child molesters, we've got extortionists, we've got thieves, and they're police officers.
[13:45.000 --> 13:50.700]  We've got mass murderers that are police officers because there are many of them still on duty
[13:50.700 --> 13:58.120]  that have killed more than once under questionable circumstances and still have their badge and
[13:58.120 --> 14:05.160]  still have that red coat, so to speak, that allows them to exercise the king's prerogative
[14:05.160 --> 14:16.960]  to abuse and steal at will. And they are protected by the attorneys, doesn't
[14:16.960 --> 14:24.880]  matter what kind of attorney, they're protected by them. The victim will never ever have their
[14:24.880 --> 14:31.560]  plaintiff's attorney work as hard for them as the defense attorney will work if the defendant
[14:31.560 --> 14:39.200]  is a police officer. If they are the defense, the victim will never
[14:39.200 --> 14:44.080]  have their defense attorney work as hard for them as the prosecution will to prove that
[14:44.080 --> 14:51.520]  the police officer was justified in everything they did and that the real criminal is the
[14:51.520 --> 14:55.920]  victim. We've seen them do it, we've seen the story
[14:55.920 --> 15:00.640]  of Hillary Clinton doing the exact same thing to a rape victim and then claiming that she's
[15:00.640 --> 15:10.560]  for women's rights baloney. She got a rapist off while vilifying the young
[15:10.560 --> 15:23.040]  girl he raped and laughed about it. This system was supposed to be about justice
[15:23.040 --> 15:38.520]  and it could not be farther from that perspective than earth is from the horse head nebula.
[15:38.520 --> 15:48.560]  And the only fault that this is the case rests entirely upon us.
[15:48.560 --> 16:00.980]  We outnumber the entire collective of attorneys, cops, and public servants in general by dozens
[16:00.980 --> 16:11.760]  if not literally hundreds to one. And yet they stand head and shoulders above
[16:11.760 --> 16:22.880]  us in every area to commit criminal acts and abuses while we suffer.
[16:22.880 --> 16:28.120]  Now I can hear some people out there, the little gears turning, saying oh there's more
[16:28.120 --> 16:31.880]  than that to it, there's those people behind the scenes with all the money that run everything
[16:31.880 --> 16:38.360]  and buy the elections and all that. That's true. But they're not doing it personally.
[16:38.360 --> 16:43.200]  I'm talking about their foot soldiers that are taking it upon themselves to act on their
[16:43.200 --> 16:49.480]  behalf for a paycheck. Without them those people you're talking about
[16:49.480 --> 16:54.560]  wouldn't have any power whatsoever. Alright folks, we'll be right back on the
[16:54.560 --> 17:01.760]  other side of this break. Y'all hang in there.
[17:01.760 --> 17:06.040]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener supported radio network
[17:06.040 --> 17:10.600]  on top of the on air talent, producers, and other hard working individuals working behind
[17:10.600 --> 17:13.160]  the scenes. Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by
[17:13.160 --> 17:17.480]  the generous support of listeners like you. And we appreciate our loyal listeners making
[17:17.480 --> 17:22.480]  contributions every year on our annual fundraisers, which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio
[17:22.480 --> 17:26.160]  Network on the air. Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make
[17:26.160 --> 17:29.640]  your contribution. Every $25 donation enters you for a chance
[17:29.640 --> 17:35.160]  to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks. First prize being a Spike Skull lower receiver,
[17:35.160 --> 17:38.600]  second prize being a Taurus Curve. Ten winners will receive gift cards from All
[17:38.600 --> 17:41.720]  About Vapor. And if you donate your $25 contribution early
[17:41.720 --> 17:45.840]  enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud.
[17:45.840 --> 17:50.240]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[17:50.240 --> 17:54.680]  The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser. Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more
[17:54.680 --> 18:00.080]  information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[18:00.080 --> 18:05.400]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:05.400 --> 18:08.840]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[18:08.840 --> 18:13.200]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:13.200 --> 18:16.640]  can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain
[18:16.640 --> 18:21.960]  English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted
[18:21.960 --> 18:27.360]  by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors
[18:27.360 --> 18:32.080]  out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay
[18:32.080 --> 18:36.400]  you to go away. The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution
[18:36.400 --> 18:40.640]  for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.640 --> 18:46.400]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.400 --> 18:55.400]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s
[18:55.400 --> 19:02.400]  at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:25.400 --> 19:32.400]  Thank you very much.
[19:56.400 --> 20:01.400]  Alright, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[20:01.400 --> 20:06.400]  Okay, now we have some callers up on the board here. Y'all give me just a minute and I'll
[20:06.400 --> 20:16.400]  start taking those. Calling number is 512-646-1984. Now, along with the opening monologue, folks,
[20:16.400 --> 20:22.400]  what we need to figure out is, what are we going to continue to do about this? We are
[20:22.400 --> 20:30.720]  teetering on the brink of economic implosion, all perpetrated by these same attorneys at
[20:30.720 --> 20:35.400]  every level of government, because they're in every level in every department of government.
[20:35.400 --> 20:40.480]  They're the ones that are making the laws that allow these banks and these bailouts
[20:40.480 --> 20:48.880]  and all this other stuff that steals from you and me in order to enrich them directly.
[20:48.880 --> 20:57.080]  If you think the people in the United States Congress did not get wealthier than any 10,000
[20:57.080 --> 21:07.080]  of us off these bailout deals that they financed through our sweat, you better think again.
[21:07.080 --> 21:18.600]  Do you know that it is perfectly legal for members of Congress to conduct insider trading?
[21:18.600 --> 21:22.920]  They can use information received only through the power and knowledge available to their
[21:22.920 --> 21:32.400]  official office for personal enrichment. Do you think they don't know in advance when
[21:32.400 --> 21:35.680]  these banks are going to go asking for these bailouts, when these other corporations are
[21:35.680 --> 21:39.800]  going to go asking for these bailouts, and that they don't cut the deals to make sure
[21:39.800 --> 21:44.520]  that they're going to get rich and fat off whatever gets generated for these folks at
[21:44.520 --> 21:56.320]  our expense? If you don't see and understand that, you're either high debt or delusional.
[21:56.320 --> 22:01.120]  And yet you sit back and think that there is going to be a silver bullet to solve this
[22:01.120 --> 22:11.280]  problem, an easy way to solve this problem, a political way to solve this problem. It's
[22:11.280 --> 22:16.240]  not going to happen. I hate the thought of it, but it's the facts. It's not going to
[22:16.240 --> 22:25.360]  happen. And again, if you think it is, well, we'll cover that one again later.
[22:25.360 --> 22:32.400]  All right. That being said, let's start taking our callers. We have Andrew from Pennsylvania,
[22:32.400 --> 22:35.800]  or what appears to be Andrew from Pennsylvania. Andrew, go ahead.
[22:35.800 --> 22:43.200]  Yes, Eddie, it is me. And this whole experience that I had with Arizona and how it played
[22:43.200 --> 22:49.440]  out kind of makes me want to have to ask you a question about the in-practice use of your
[22:49.440 --> 22:55.080]  red light camera letter, which can in theory be converted into a letter to fight, like
[22:55.080 --> 22:59.480]  a speeding ticket or like a toll booth citation. If you reword-
[22:59.480 --> 23:04.160]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Where did you get that theory from?
[23:04.160 --> 23:09.000]  Why can't it be? I mean, it's basically the same idea, like a camera films you with the
[23:09.000 --> 23:14.040]  red light. Likewise, a camera would film you with a speeding ticket or like running a toll
[23:14.040 --> 23:18.280]  booth. So I would think the same principle would hold true that you can-
[23:18.280 --> 23:26.080]  Okay, wait a minute, wait a minute. As far as camera citations go, yes. As far as any
[23:26.080 --> 23:33.080]  citation goes, no. It would only, that red light camera letter would work more or less
[23:33.080 --> 23:40.540]  only in places where any of those offenses are themselves civil infractions. The difference
[23:40.540 --> 23:47.700]  there being that there is no stop in seizure in the camera ticket, like there would be
[23:47.700 --> 23:53.160]  when the cop pulls you over directly, which of course he would not have had any probable
[23:53.160 --> 24:02.400]  cause to do because there was no criminal offense being committed in his presence review.
[24:02.400 --> 24:07.080]  So you can't convert it to anything. So I just want to be clear on that.
[24:07.080 --> 24:13.440]  Right, right. But what I wanted to ask is just to give a rundown of the whole Arizona
[24:13.440 --> 24:21.640]  thing. Randy Kelton told me file like a motion to dismiss, motion to sue and motion for removal.
[24:21.640 --> 24:29.080]  And I did using his documents on jurisimprudence.com. And I assumed everything was going to be okay
[24:29.080 --> 24:33.520]  because they send my mother who bailed me out of jail or money. And Randy told me that's
[24:33.520 --> 24:38.520]  a good indication. They don't want to pursue the case any further. But they did apparently
[24:38.520 --> 24:44.320]  run my name through a computer system, which made them see, okay, let's try to prosecute
[24:44.320 --> 24:48.280]  the case because well, I guess because they need the money and everything. So I'm not
[24:48.280 --> 24:52.240]  going to shift blame to Randy or anything. I probably could have, should have been aware
[24:52.240 --> 24:56.840]  that they were going to do that. But anyway, the one thing I want to bring up about this
[24:56.840 --> 25:04.480]  is in theory, in practice, if someone were like, get a red light camera ticket a thousand
[25:04.480 --> 25:09.480]  miles away from home, and they were like, they live in Pennsylvania, like I do, and
[25:09.480 --> 25:14.200]  they got a red light camera letter traveling in their car in like the state of California,
[25:14.200 --> 25:20.600]  well, way over a thousand miles away. And they decide to get a letter from the law enforcement
[25:20.600 --> 25:26.280]  people in California saying, okay, we caught you, pay a fine. And they try to use your
[25:26.280 --> 25:33.680]  red light camera letter to fight the case. Well, let's imagine you do that. And then
[25:33.680 --> 25:38.800]  several months down the line, they prosecute the case against you. They say they file another
[25:38.800 --> 25:41.920]  motion saying, okay, charges impressed against you. Now I bring this-
[25:41.920 --> 25:48.400]  Now wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. There are no charges. Okay. There
[25:48.400 --> 25:56.600]  aren't any. It's civil. This is entirely 100% administrative. Okay. What you're not understanding
[25:56.600 --> 26:02.360]  about an administrative process versus a criminal process is, is they absolutely can take your
[26:02.360 --> 26:08.640]  money in absentia. They don't need you to be present. They give you the opportunity,
[26:08.640 --> 26:14.240]  but if you don't show it's considered waived, since it's an administrative process, no big
[26:14.240 --> 26:20.840]  deal. Now that makes it an unconstitutional bill
[26:20.840 --> 26:28.040]  of pains and penalties. Since there's no judicial review, is there? Is there judicial review
[26:28.040 --> 26:35.320]  of these types of citations in Arizona? No.
[26:35.320 --> 26:42.800]  How do you know that? I looked into it way back.
[26:42.800 --> 26:47.800]  So you're positive that if you appeal the ruling, you don't get to see an actual judge
[26:47.800 --> 26:55.680]  with an actual jury. If I appeal the ruling, no, not positive
[26:55.680 --> 26:59.720]  on that one. Well, that was my question. So how can you
[26:59.720 --> 27:09.840]  be both positive and not positive? Got me there. All right. Good. You got me
[27:09.840 --> 27:17.800]  there pal. But anyway, what I wanted to ask you about this whole issue of being over a
[27:17.800 --> 27:25.880]  thousand miles away, if they prosecute a case against you and you are like way away from
[27:25.880 --> 27:32.080]  the line, like way out of the state and like, well, like I was, Randy Kelton told me it
[27:32.080 --> 27:38.960]  would cost you thousands more, well, a thousand more, a lot more to fight the case and traveling
[27:38.960 --> 27:46.920]  back and forth to Arizona, fighting as a pro se, than what to just hire an attorney to
[27:46.920 --> 27:51.040]  fight for you. And even though the attorney is not going to fight the case using the right
[27:51.040 --> 27:57.560]  to travel, you're still going to end up paying less money simply because you hire them.
[27:57.560 --> 28:00.760]  So- Well, that part's generally correct. That's
[28:00.760 --> 28:06.560]  an economic answer right there. If you can't afford to fly or travel back and forth that
[28:06.560 --> 28:11.320]  far every time you have a court date, you know, that would add up pretty quick, I would
[28:11.320 --> 28:18.080]  think considering to a one-time fee to an attorney to either get it dismissed or whatever.
[28:18.080 --> 28:24.400]  So as far as the economic side of that goes, Randy's absolutely correct. Unless you fly
[28:24.400 --> 28:32.680]  or travel for free. Which I can't do. So getting back to your thing,
[28:32.680 --> 28:37.400]  just so I'm not confused about this, you're telling me that if you were to file a red
[28:37.400 --> 28:43.920]  light camera letter with a state that's over a thousand miles away, they would not send
[28:43.920 --> 28:50.200]  you a notice saying you got to appear because- I didn't say they wouldn't send you a notice.
[28:50.200 --> 28:55.240]  Where the hell did I ever say that? You didn't, but I'm trying to clarify that
[28:55.240 --> 28:58.760]  issue as to whether or not that's- Of course they're going to send you a notice.
[28:58.760 --> 29:04.320]  That's part of the administrative process. They can't take your money without providing
[29:04.320 --> 29:07.800]  notice. Yeah.
[29:07.800 --> 29:13.620]  That's your opportunity to appear and argue. It's up to you whether or not you take it.
[29:13.620 --> 29:19.200]  But if you don't, they're not a stopper for moving forward because it's administrative
[29:19.200 --> 29:31.400]  and not criminal. All right. So when you- it doesn't make from
[29:31.400 --> 29:38.240]  an economic standpoint, you would actually- there are cases where even though it may cost
[29:38.240 --> 29:42.280]  you more money just for the sake of trying to keep the money out of their pocket, you
[29:42.280 --> 29:46.280]  may want to pay a little extra money to fight them.
[29:46.280 --> 29:50.200]  Okay. Hang on just a second, Andrew, and we'll try to pick this back up on the other side.
[29:50.200 --> 30:01.560]  All right, folks. Call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back after this break.
[30:01.560 --> 30:06.080]  We all know the FBI likes getting citizens to inform on their friends, but did you know
[30:06.080 --> 30:10.640]  Facebook is now up to the same dirty tricks? I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell
[30:10.640 --> 30:16.720]  you how Facebook is turning users into snitches that rat each other out next.
[30:16.720 --> 30:21.240]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[30:21.240 --> 30:27.040]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.040 --> 30:33.280]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[30:33.280 --> 30:38.360]  it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private
[30:38.360 --> 30:45.560]  search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.560 --> 30:50.680]  In an age where every crumb of personal data is prized by snoopy governments and shady
[30:50.680 --> 30:55.560]  marketers, pseudonyms are shields of freedom. Fake names help us connect on the web without
[30:55.560 --> 31:01.360]  having to trade our most precious asset, privacy. But now Facebook is asking users to snitch
[31:01.360 --> 31:06.600]  on friends who use aliases, and it's got me hopping mad. By showing people's accounts
[31:06.600 --> 31:11.680]  to their Facebook friends and asking what that person's real name is, Facebook is assaulting
[31:11.680 --> 31:17.040]  a basic freedom to call ourselves whatever we choose, except, of course, on official
[31:17.040 --> 31:22.040]  documents. Facebook is not your friend, it's a snoop. Don't let it breach your trust with
[31:22.040 --> 31:27.320]  your real friends. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private
[31:27.320 --> 31:28.320]  search engine.
[31:28.320 --> 31:36.920]  What are you thinking? Microplant powder with iodine and probiotics, or a total body detox
[31:36.920 --> 31:43.200]  for around $10 a month? If USA.org has 12 formulations of microplant powder for absorbing
[31:43.200 --> 31:48.120]  and removing toxins from your kidneys, liver, blood, lung, stomach, and colon, and feel
[31:48.120 --> 31:53.800]  better than ever, it alkalizes. Oxygen A kills parasites, does the job of 10 products. That
[31:53.800 --> 32:00.800]  saves you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367 or visit usa.org.
[32:00.800 --> 32:06.960]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America,
[32:06.960 --> 32:09.920]  we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have
[32:09.920 --> 32:13.960]  a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those
[32:13.960 --> 32:17.160]  rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own
[32:17.160 --> 32:21.160]  private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts
[32:21.160 --> 32:25.160]  afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights
[32:25.160 --> 32:28.920]  through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law
[32:28.920 --> 32:32.440]  Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[32:32.440 --> 32:36.480]  understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get
[32:36.480 --> 32:40.520]  your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering
[32:40.520 --> 32:44.480]  your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation
[32:44.480 --> 32:48.920]  Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of
[32:48.920 --> 32:52.640]  research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights
[32:52.640 --> 32:57.280]  with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, and together we can
[32:57.280 --> 33:00.280]  have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:00.280 --> 33:21.640]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. Yeah, I got a warrant, and I gonna solve them,
[33:21.640 --> 33:36.080]  to the government them, prosecute them. Okay. All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule
[33:36.080 --> 33:43.400]  of Law Radio, and calling numbers 512-646-1984, and we are talking with Andrew in Pennsylvania.
[33:43.400 --> 33:47.760]  All right, Andrew, please continue. Yeah, can we backtrack for just a moment? When
[33:47.760 --> 33:52.400]  you asked me that thing about the judicial thing, I think I may have confused judicial
[33:52.400 --> 33:56.800]  with criminal, and I need to backtrack to that whole conversation that you had with
[33:56.800 --> 34:01.960]  me and Randy. You were talking about the whole issue of civil versus criminal. You kept saying
[34:01.960 --> 34:06.560]  it was civil, but I didn't want to interrupt you guys at the time, but no, my case was
[34:06.560 --> 34:13.240]  criminal, because I was alleged going over 90 miles per hour, which in Arizona is criminal,
[34:13.240 --> 34:16.480]  and when you asked me the thing about judicial, I think that was when I said, yeah, I looked
[34:16.480 --> 34:23.640]  it up. I was confusing judicial with criminal. So, am I confused? Am I assumed to...
[34:23.640 --> 34:28.320]  Okay, if it was actually criminal, and you didn't show up, then there would definitely
[34:28.320 --> 34:35.600]  be repercussions for not doing that, especially considering that Arizona has an interstate
[34:35.600 --> 34:46.800]  license compact with Texas, and well, not with, I'm sorry, with Pennsylvania.
[34:46.800 --> 34:56.240]  All right, so makes sense, but in practice, when you're fighting the case, like Randy
[34:56.240 --> 35:01.640]  told me, they got so much advantage against you because you're over a thousand miles away.
[35:01.640 --> 35:05.560]  When I told you that, you were like, well, don't give me that. Well, I was like, well,
[35:05.560 --> 35:10.120]  I'm just repeating what Randy told me, not to shift blame on Randy, but I mean, maybe
[35:10.120 --> 35:16.320]  I didn't do enough research to figure out what I can do so they could not have an advantage
[35:16.320 --> 35:23.800]  over me because I am over a thousand miles away from them after they prosecuted the case.
[35:23.800 --> 35:29.480]  So maybe give me a little lecture here and advice. What should I have done to prevent
[35:29.480 --> 35:31.560]  them from having an advantage over me?
[35:31.560 --> 35:36.040]  Well, you're at a disadvantage the moment you get entangled in the system, whether it's
[35:36.040 --> 35:42.960]  a thousand miles away or right there where you live. That's problem number one. The deal
[35:42.960 --> 35:47.360]  there is always the same, Andrew. You asked me to tell you something I've told you a thousand
[35:47.360 --> 35:53.640]  times, and that is if you're going to play the game, understand the rules. Okay? And
[35:53.640 --> 35:59.280]  that applies to whatever venue the game is actually being held in. You have to understand
[35:59.280 --> 36:04.760]  that venues rules. They play Monopoly quite differently in Pennsylvania than they do in
[36:04.760 --> 36:11.120]  Texas. You understand? Yeah. Everybody's got their own little house rules they change
[36:11.120 --> 36:19.640]  up the game with. So when you challenge what they're doing, how do you do that without
[36:19.640 --> 36:26.840]  knowing the rules? It's a bad idea, of course. Generally speaking, yeah, except for sheer
[36:26.840 --> 36:34.680]  dumb luck and most people don't have luck that good. So the facts are even though you
[36:34.680 --> 36:41.800]  could have still attacked it on the issue of does the law apply or doesn't it apply,
[36:41.800 --> 36:47.680]  you don't know it well enough to know. And what did you do it to stop? Did you give up
[36:47.680 --> 36:50.680]  a license or any of the accouterments?
[36:50.680 --> 36:59.920]  No, no, no. I followed your script and I left the window rolled down. It was my mistake.
[36:59.920 --> 37:04.360]  And after I sent the part to your attitude demeanor and that part of the script the officer
[37:04.360 --> 37:11.480]  lost his cool and grabbed me out of the car and everything. So I repeated one other thing
[37:11.480 --> 37:16.140]  I kind of did wrong was I repeatedly told him I'm not operating in a far higher capacity
[37:16.140 --> 37:20.320]  and I was hoping he would acknowledge that he was so informed. But at that I should have
[37:20.320 --> 37:25.280]  only said that once. It wasn't really necessary for me to repeat that over and over again.
[37:25.280 --> 37:31.120]  And I mean, this officer, this is a case of the officer because of his ignorance and stupidity
[37:31.120 --> 37:41.520]  and bad attitude, probably would have broken the window down if I rolled it up. But I guess
[37:41.520 --> 37:48.480]  I really wanted to make this call to you tonight to clarify like if it's a distance factor
[37:48.480 --> 37:55.400]  and does it like make more sense like in my case to pay a little extra money to fight
[37:55.400 --> 38:00.840]  pro se right to travel rather than hire a lawyer in the case they're prosecuting against
[38:00.840 --> 38:02.160]  you. And I thought maybe...
[38:02.160 --> 38:09.800]  Well, that depends. If you inherited from Hugh Hefner, knock yourself out. Okay. But
[38:09.800 --> 38:13.400]  if you don't have the funds to do it, you're asking me to tell you what your finances are.
[38:13.400 --> 38:19.360]  Hell, I don't know. I know what mine are. I couldn't afford to do either one, but I'm
[38:19.360 --> 38:22.320]  going to do something.
[38:22.320 --> 38:32.160]  Yeah. And there are... You would think there would have to be ways for me to not have to...
[38:32.160 --> 38:39.120]  Before I hired the lawyer, I could have like maybe played game of chess where I sent paperwork
[38:39.120 --> 38:47.400]  to Arizona like the Juris Dictionary website. They talk about how before you actually go
[38:47.400 --> 38:49.120]  to trial, you try to...
[38:49.120 --> 38:55.160]  No, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Stop, stop, stop, stop, stop. Don't cite Juris Dictionary.
[38:55.160 --> 39:00.960]  Juris Dictionary is for civil lawsuits. When you're going to sue someone else, it doesn't
[39:00.960 --> 39:05.800]  have a damn thing to do with what we're talking about here. This is a criminal case. They
[39:05.800 --> 39:07.440]  don't work the same.
[39:07.440 --> 39:11.360]  Yeah. So there's no way you can like try to win the case.
[39:11.360 --> 39:17.680]  No, stop, stop, stop, stop. No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying don't cite Juris Dictionary
[39:17.680 --> 39:23.360]  as the source of the process because it's not the same process. Of course, you're going
[39:23.360 --> 39:30.600]  to file documentation. What is the first thing I tell you to do after you get a citation?
[39:30.600 --> 39:36.360]  You go down and you file your affidavit of not engaging in commerce on the highways.
[39:36.360 --> 39:41.640]  You go down and file your first set of preliminary motions just as fast as you can.
[39:41.640 --> 39:48.520]  Now, folks, this brings up one other point that I don't know if I've mentioned before
[39:48.520 --> 39:53.440]  but I'm going to make darn sure to mention it now since it's fresh on my mind. I don't
[39:53.440 --> 39:59.160]  care that you got a copy of the citation from the cop. The first time you go in or the first
[39:59.160 --> 40:03.960]  time you request records from that court, you make darn sure to get a copy front and
[40:03.960 --> 40:09.560]  back of every single page of that citation that was filed with that court.
[40:09.560 --> 40:14.520]  And the reason for that is because sometimes these cops and these courts cooperate together
[40:14.520 --> 40:19.260]  to undermine the defense before they ever appear. And they do that by the cops making
[40:19.260 --> 40:27.760]  handwritten notes on the court's copy of the citation but not the accused copy. In other
[40:27.760 --> 40:35.680]  words, they're passing information and messages directly to the judge via the citation.
[40:35.680 --> 40:41.920]  And they'll do things like they'll write bad attitude, know it all, jailhouse lawyer,
[40:41.920 --> 40:45.520]  stuff like that on there that will tell the court exactly what they need to know to say
[40:45.520 --> 40:51.440]  you think you know better than us, huh? Well, let us show you.
[40:51.440 --> 40:59.040]  So always get a copy of the citation that was filed, not just the one in your hand.
[40:59.040 --> 41:04.520]  Now as far as what you could do, Andrew, of course you can file all of the necessary motions
[41:04.520 --> 41:11.160]  to get it dismissed beforehand. But the advantage Randy's talking about them having is, is if
[41:11.160 --> 41:20.120]  they call a motions hearing and they don't allow telephony as an access to that hearing,
[41:20.120 --> 41:31.120]  then guess what? That was a clue for you to jump in and say, I've got a-
[41:31.120 --> 41:34.080]  Hire a lawyer. Well, that was-
[41:34.080 --> 41:38.720]  What's the lawyer going to do with any documentation you filed, Andrew? And they set a motions
[41:38.720 --> 41:41.920]  hearing for it. What's the lawyer going to do for you then?
[41:41.920 --> 41:47.160]  Probably whatever, of course, they have the advantage to get the dollar, get the extra-
[41:47.160 --> 41:52.720]  No, he's not going to do anything. He can't go into that. He is not going to go into that
[41:52.720 --> 42:00.800]  courtroom for your hearing on something you filed.
[42:00.800 --> 42:01.800]  You get it?
[42:01.800 --> 42:04.120]  Yeah, I really, yeah, yeah, of course.
[42:04.120 --> 42:14.760]  So that means you have to do what?
[42:14.760 --> 42:20.480]  That means you have to make the trip. That's the advantage Randy's talking about.
[42:20.480 --> 42:29.320]  Okay. I didn't really want to do that though.
[42:29.320 --> 42:32.960]  Well, from the sounds of things, it's a little too late to think about what you don't want
[42:32.960 --> 42:37.920]  to do. They've already done it for you. The problem I'm having is, is you're saying that
[42:37.920 --> 42:43.680]  they found you guilty. They can't conduct a criminal trial in absentia unless the accused
[42:43.680 --> 42:50.640]  was there at the beginning of the trial. You follow?
[42:50.640 --> 42:57.840]  And I wasn't there. Yeah. Now I follow.
[42:57.840 --> 43:02.040]  And if that's the case, how then can this have been criminal if they found you guilty
[43:02.040 --> 43:06.440]  or say you owe them money?
[43:06.440 --> 43:14.640]  Exactly. But now you're so sure that it is because it was 90 miles an hour. Is it or
[43:14.640 --> 43:19.520]  isn't it? Once again, we have a contradiction here.
[43:19.520 --> 43:29.960]  Yeah, we do. And I made the mistake of assuming that I knew what the case was.
[43:29.960 --> 43:35.840]  Okay. Well, so far it sounds like you're doing a whole lot of assuming and very little actual
[43:35.840 --> 43:41.800]  reading. Okay. You need to fix that problem.
[43:41.800 --> 43:46.200]  No problem. All right. I appreciate you calling in, man.
[43:46.200 --> 43:49.400]  I'm going to take somebody else on the other side. I've had you for this whole segment.
[43:49.400 --> 43:51.200]  Okay? Take care. Take care.
[43:51.200 --> 43:57.200]  All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio 512-646-1984. We'll be right back after this
[43:57.200 --> 43:58.200]  break.
[43:58.200 --> 44:07.400]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with JurisDictionary,
[44:07.400 --> 44:14.080]  the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by
[44:14.080 --> 44:15.080]  step.
[44:15.080 --> 44:20.720]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[44:20.720 --> 44:26.000]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and
[44:26.000 --> 44:32.840]  now you can too. JurisDictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning
[44:32.840 --> 44:38.760]  experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:38.760 --> 44:44.240]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio
[44:44.240 --> 44:51.280]  classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much
[44:51.280 --> 45:00.720]  more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.720 --> 45:09.440]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our
[45:09.440 --> 45:14.760]  store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D here in Austin, Texas, buying Brave New Books and
[45:14.760 --> 45:18.880]  J-Tank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:18.880 --> 45:23.920]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.920 --> 45:27.920]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Eme oil,
[45:27.920 --> 45:36.080]  lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find
[45:36.080 --> 45:44.520]  us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. Don't
[45:44.520 --> 45:49.960]  forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[46:14.520 --> 46:41.480]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. The call-in number is 512-646-1984
[46:41.480 --> 46:46.560]  and now we are going to Jeff in Mississippi. Jeff, what can we do for you?
[46:46.560 --> 46:50.000]  Hey, Randy, or Eddie, thanks for having me on.
[46:50.000 --> 46:51.000]  Yes, sir.
[46:51.000 --> 46:57.520]  Okay, I've got two questions. One of them is pretty quick and easy. I'm going through
[46:57.520 --> 47:05.760]  a federal civil case and we're batting back and forth responses and answers and I've called
[47:05.760 --> 47:10.120]  you about this problem before and it's still going on. It's driving me crazy. We're going
[47:10.120 --> 47:14.960]  back and forth, back and forth, little piddly stuff, but I keep responding because I don't
[47:14.960 --> 47:23.480]  want to default. So, can I file a motion for judgment on the pleadings? Can I do that to
[47:23.480 --> 47:26.200]  stop them? I'm the plaintiff.
[47:26.200 --> 47:29.840]  What is the criteria for filing such a motion?
[47:29.840 --> 47:38.960]  I have read in, okay, I'm trying to remember, in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it
[47:38.960 --> 47:46.760]  says that the defendant can do it against the complaint, but then I got on an attorney's
[47:46.760 --> 47:53.960]  blog and the attorney's blog said that the plaintiff can do it to stop the defendants
[47:53.960 --> 47:59.160]  from all these playing games with all these answers and responses. So, I'm kind of split
[47:59.160 --> 48:01.280]  down the middle. I don't know.
[48:01.280 --> 48:05.600]  Well, you can file it and the court can deny it and that's that.
[48:05.600 --> 48:06.600]  Okay.
[48:06.600 --> 48:10.800]  It's not going to hurt to do it, is it? You didn't see anything that said there's a downside
[48:10.800 --> 48:11.800]  to filing one.
[48:11.800 --> 48:16.240]  Oh, no. No. I just wanted to know if it's effective to please them.
[48:16.240 --> 48:19.880]  Well, don't know. If you don't have an example of it having been done from the plaintiff's
[48:19.880 --> 48:24.960]  side before, rather than just a discussion of theoretical probability or possibility,
[48:24.960 --> 48:28.000]  I can't answer that any more than you can.
[48:28.000 --> 48:38.360]  Okay. Okay. My second question is, I'm suing a college, a university, right? And they are
[48:38.360 --> 48:46.120]  claiming immunity, right? And one thing that I heard, I listened to a podcast, I have not
[48:46.120 --> 48:53.360]  seen this in the law, but it made sense. The person doing the podcast said that if an attorney,
[48:53.360 --> 48:59.880]  let's say an attorney, an officer of the court of the state does something to you and you
[48:59.880 --> 49:05.800]  file a complaint with the bar, or if it's a judge, you file a complaint with the judicial
[49:05.800 --> 49:14.320]  review, their supervisors, if the supervisors do not do anything to help you, then that
[49:14.320 --> 49:17.800]  strips them of their immunity. Is that true?
[49:17.800 --> 49:18.800]  No.
[49:18.800 --> 49:20.640]  That is not true. Okay.
[49:20.640 --> 49:26.520]  Not that I'm aware of, because immunity is not based upon what assistance they give you.
[49:26.520 --> 49:32.440]  Immunity is based upon what happened and what the law is on the subject. Here's the situation.
[49:32.440 --> 49:38.280]  Official, qualified and sovereign. Okay? Those are the forms of immunity that they can try
[49:38.280 --> 49:45.000]  to claim. In order for them to qualify for any of those immunities, the very first requirement
[49:45.000 --> 49:50.880]  is that they must be acting governmentally. Okay? If it's not associated with their official
[49:50.880 --> 50:01.960]  capacity, their immunity does not apply, ever. Okay. Now, if this university did not own
[50:01.960 --> 50:07.440]  the property where this occurred, that room you were staying in there, and they had a
[50:07.440 --> 50:15.800]  contract agreement with that, now we're talking about a commercial exercise. Okay?
[50:15.800 --> 50:23.280]  There is case law that says when the government acts in commerce through contract, it has
[50:23.280 --> 50:31.080]  no immunities, because it is just as any other corporation would be when engaging in that
[50:31.080 --> 50:39.880]  process. So here is my theory on your situation in this regard. If the university did not
[50:39.880 --> 50:44.720]  own the apartment complex or the dorm complex where this took place, and it was not actually
[50:44.720 --> 50:48.880]  on university property, which we know it wasn't, correct?
[50:48.880 --> 50:50.720]  Mm-hmm. That's right.
[50:50.720 --> 50:57.760]  Okay? If they were contracted with this building or corporation and owned this building or
[50:57.760 --> 51:06.240]  whatever to provide dorm rooms for university students, then we have a commercial engagement
[51:06.240 --> 51:13.360]  with this entity where they used their so-called university authority to do something that
[51:13.360 --> 51:21.320]  they couldn't do because they had no governmental authority in that building.
[51:21.320 --> 51:25.160]  Okay. Okay?
[51:25.160 --> 51:30.200]  So there, there's simply somebody else that was guilty of invading a private residence
[51:30.200 --> 51:35.720]  without a warrant, without probable cause, and without any criminal act in order to commit
[51:35.720 --> 51:40.520]  crimes themselves. They don't have immunity for that.
[51:40.520 --> 51:47.640]  Okay. Now that's a working theory, but to me it
[51:47.640 --> 51:51.320]  would sound right based upon the case law.
[51:51.320 --> 51:59.120]  Yes. And my problem is, is that when I allege these in my complaint, I've got a pretty
[51:59.120 --> 52:03.720]  good solid complaint. I'm not any good at complaints, but it's just like you said, it's
[52:03.720 --> 52:10.120]  good and solid. They're coming back responses of silly stuff, like, yeah, we do have immunity,
[52:10.120 --> 52:14.480]  and it's just, yeah, we are. No, you're not. Yeah, we are. No, you're not. And I've sent
[52:14.480 --> 52:19.320]  back about 20 or 30 different answers and responses, and it's driving me crazy. So I'm
[52:19.320 --> 52:23.840]  wanting to shut these people down. Yeah, this is how they drive up your cost
[52:23.840 --> 52:33.320]  and make you bail. Because you have to pay for service on everyone when you answer one.
[52:33.320 --> 52:40.440]  Okay. This is exactly why lawsuits are expensive, because of these attorneys games. Remember
[52:40.440 --> 52:44.360]  how I started this show, folks, about the attorneys? This is a prime example of what
[52:44.360 --> 52:49.080]  I'm talking about. They control the system. They set the rules. They make it where they've
[52:49.080 --> 52:54.280]  benefit from the game while you suffer, even when you are supposed to be the one seeking
[52:54.280 --> 53:01.320]  justice for their illegal actions. Now you know why I've got a fundraiser for
[53:01.320 --> 53:09.320]  $25,000 for a lawsuit. Because I have no idea how much it will cost. All I can do is guesstimate
[53:09.320 --> 53:17.440]  how much it will probably cost. So I feel your pain there as far as that goes, the money
[53:17.440 --> 53:20.640]  and all that. But that's what they're doing. They're trying to make you go broke so you
[53:20.640 --> 53:25.800]  can't complete the lawsuit. Well, another thing they're doing is, and it's
[53:25.800 --> 53:31.520]  working, is they throw so many documents at you that after about six months, you start
[53:31.520 --> 53:34.760]  forgetting which one you actually responded to.
[53:34.760 --> 53:38.000]  Right. And so I'm getting that panicked feeling of,
[53:38.000 --> 53:42.320]  oh, no, did I forget to respond to document number two?
[53:42.320 --> 53:47.720]  Okay. I'm going to give you a little clue about how to handle that. Make yourself a
[53:47.720 --> 53:54.440]  whiteboard battle board. Every time you receive something that requires a response, you add
[53:54.440 --> 54:00.280]  it to the board and you put a status up there with it. Okay? I don't care how you make the
[54:00.280 --> 54:06.880]  status legible to yourself, colored ink, a pen, a magnet, I don't care. But just so you
[54:06.880 --> 54:14.320]  know what the status of that document is. Received on such and such date. Keep that information
[54:14.320 --> 54:18.800]  up there all the time. The very first thing you do, write down what you got, the date
[54:18.800 --> 54:23.920]  it was postmarked, the date you actually received it, and the date it's due to be responded
[54:23.920 --> 54:29.160]  to. Then you put out there next to the status whatever status it's in. And you keep everything
[54:29.160 --> 54:34.680]  tracked on that board, on that computer, something you can look at readily and easily and identify
[54:34.680 --> 54:40.440]  where you are with everything. Okay. A key to one of the biggest keys to fighting any
[54:40.440 --> 54:52.160]  court battle, especially a lawsuit, is to manage your tasks. Would filing a motion for
[54:52.160 --> 54:58.640]  sanctions help to stop this? If you can show that the purpose of their actions is for delay
[54:58.640 --> 55:08.600]  or abuse of process, absolutely. Yeah. Okay. We're going to do that. That's my next move.
[55:08.600 --> 55:13.840]  Okay. Okay. Well, that answers my question. Thank you very much. I'll let you move on
[55:13.840 --> 55:18.800]  to the next caller. All right, Jeff. Thanks for calling in. Thanks. All right. Now we're
[55:18.800 --> 55:25.000]  going to go to Tom in Maryland. Tom, what can we do for you? Hey, Eddie. How did you
[55:25.000 --> 55:30.360]  know it was me? Well, that's what it came up with. Obviously, you must have called in
[55:30.360 --> 55:34.880]  at some point before. I did. I did. All right. Quickly, I just wanted to, I wanted to, I'm
[55:34.880 --> 55:40.120]  having a really hard time getting a straight answer from our lovely court system here in
[55:40.120 --> 55:47.000]  Maryland about the difference between the civil and criminal infraction. And I contact
[55:47.000 --> 55:52.360]  the court and the answer I get from them is that it's not a, it's neither. It's a citation.
[55:52.360 --> 55:56.880]  No, there ain't, there ain't no such thing as neither. I'll tell you what they're attempting
[55:56.880 --> 56:02.640]  to get you to accept. They're going to call it quasi criminal. And here's what that actually
[56:02.640 --> 56:12.280]  means in legal parlance. It is a civil suit handled under criminal rules. It's a complete
[56:12.280 --> 56:17.300]  violation of every form of constitutional prohibition on bills of pains and penalties
[56:17.300 --> 56:23.760]  you can imagine. We've got a civil item being handled as if it was a criminal item under
[56:23.760 --> 56:30.200]  a set of rules that don't actually apply to it. Now, if you get them to admit that, here
[56:30.200 --> 56:37.120]  is their problem. If the court is admitting that the action itself is civil, but they're
[56:37.120 --> 56:42.000]  going to play the game by the criminal rules, then what they've admitted is that the officer
[56:42.000 --> 56:48.200]  could never have gotten probable cause to apprehend you in the first place. It would
[56:48.200 --> 56:53.960]  be in that case, exactly the same thing as a civil infraction. There is no authority
[56:53.960 --> 57:01.640]  to apprehend without a warrant for something civil because probable cause and reasonable
[57:01.640 --> 57:11.880]  suspicion do not exist. They only exist in relation to crimes. If the court cannot articulate
[57:11.880 --> 57:19.280]  and the officer cannot articulate and the prosecution cannot articulate a crime, then
[57:19.280 --> 57:25.200]  they cannot articulate probable cause, making their very first action at the point of contact
[57:25.200 --> 57:31.280]  with the police officer illegal because there was no warrant and it was an illegal search
[57:31.280 --> 57:39.320]  and seizure of the person. Okay. So what you need to do is write a motion
[57:39.320 --> 57:43.640]  to dismiss based upon the information you have received, naming the person you received
[57:43.640 --> 57:51.760]  it from and stating that absent proper notice of the actual nature of the allegations, this
[57:51.760 --> 57:57.520]  court cannot possibly have established proper jurisdiction through the prosecution because
[57:57.520 --> 58:02.680]  without a proper nature and cause, I haven't received my proper notice. You haven't been
[58:02.680 --> 58:10.320]  invested with jurisdiction. This is a non-case. You follow?
[58:10.320 --> 58:17.720]  Following that motion, I do that before the hearing and when I send my, do I even need
[58:17.720 --> 58:24.440]  to send a ticket in and check that box because then I do want to go to trial, request a trial.
[58:24.440 --> 58:28.300]  Don't give away that ticket. You need that ticket. That's something that you can use
[58:28.300 --> 58:33.400]  against them later. Okay. Make a copy of it and attach it if you
[58:33.400 --> 58:35.920]  need to, but yes, file the motion before the hearing.
[58:35.920 --> 58:41.600]  File the motion before the hearing, but I do need to send it in and request the trial.
[58:41.600 --> 58:46.480]  Yeah. Okay. Well, hang on Tom. We'll finish this up on the other side. All right, folks.
[58:46.480 --> 58:52.920]  512-646-1984. We'll be right back. The Bible remains the most popular book in
[58:52.920 --> 58:58.600]  the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some
[58:58.600 --> 59:04.000]  new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:04.000 --> 59:11.040]  the profound meaning of the scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation
[59:11.040 --> 59:16.960]  is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory
[59:16.960 --> 59:22.880]  footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing
[59:22.880 --> 59:28.400]  an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.400 --> 59:33.520]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.520 --> 59:43.960]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.960 --> 59:51.600]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. You are listening
[59:51.600 --> 01:00:00.800]  to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.800 --> 01:00:06.000]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli
[01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:13.600]  bulletins for the commodities market. Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop
[01:00:13.600 --> 01:00:24.720]  into the tides of the alternatives. Markets for Friday, April 15, 2016 are currently treading
[01:00:24.720 --> 01:00:34.200]  with gold at $1,233.72 an ounce, silver at $16.21 an ounce, Texas crude at $40.36 a barrel
[01:00:34.200 --> 01:00:44.560]  and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $430 U.S. currency.
[01:00:44.560 --> 01:00:50.520]  Today in history, the year 1865, Abraham Lincoln is shot at Ford's Theater in Washington,
[01:00:50.520 --> 01:00:59.880]  D.C. Honest Abe died today in history. In recent years, 22 Texas Republican district
[01:00:59.880 --> 01:01:05.080]  or county conventions passed resolutions calling for a vote on state secession in March. Though
[01:01:05.080 --> 01:01:09.720]  only 10 responded and actually validated the passage of such resolutions, an official count
[01:01:09.720 --> 01:01:14.040]  should be available from the Republican Party of Texas in early May. Last year, the Texas
[01:01:14.040 --> 01:01:18.020]  nationalist movement made headlines with a statewide tour of speaking events seeking
[01:01:18.020 --> 01:01:22.560]  enough signatures to get secession on the GOP primary ballot. Daniel Miller, the group's
[01:01:22.560 --> 01:01:27.000]  president said that they came close but not close enough. However, as a result, recruited
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:32.000]  and trained a lot of volunteers from Amarillo to San Antonio. Supporters of an independent
[01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:36.720]  Texas promote such efforts because of federal overreach, corruption and excessive spending,
[01:01:36.720 --> 01:01:40.200]  not to mention the reality of Texas being large and economically independent enough
[01:01:40.200 --> 01:01:45.000]  to actually go it alone. And though the Supreme Court ruled in 1869 that states do not have
[01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:48.920]  the right to secede, secessionists are pointing out that these rulings will have no binding
[01:01:48.920 --> 01:01:52.440]  once the state declares independence. Federalists are warning that the federal government will
[01:01:52.440 --> 01:01:56.840]  be obligated to use force against such a move since it would be considered rebellion under
[01:01:56.840 --> 01:01:59.760]  federal regulation.
[01:01:59.760 --> 01:02:06.200]  150 federal to state law enforcement from various agencies assisted the Seguin police
[01:02:06.200 --> 01:02:10.080]  department with dozens of arrest warrants targeting Mexican mafia operations trafficking
[01:02:10.080 --> 01:02:14.520]  heroin and cocaine into Seguin and new brothels. This mass coordinated effort, 18 months in
[01:02:14.520 --> 01:02:18.960]  the planning, was set in motion when indictments unsealed Friday charged defendants with conspiracy
[01:02:18.960 --> 01:02:23.080]  to possess and intent to distribute controlled substances. Authorities suspect those rounded
[01:02:23.080 --> 01:02:26.840]  up are responsible for distributing heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine into Seguin and
[01:02:26.840 --> 01:02:31.520]  new brothels since 2010. The alleged leader of the mafia lieutenant is among the people
[01:02:31.520 --> 01:02:35.480]  arrested. Police say that these networks supply drugs from Austin to Houston and are believed
[01:02:35.480 --> 01:02:39.400]  to even have ties within the Texas prison system. It does seem police have found themselves
[01:02:39.400 --> 01:02:43.720]  a cozy permanent job waging the drug war. Unfortunately, these indefinite efforts will
[01:02:43.720 --> 01:02:48.040]  continue to remain so because of the criminalization of drugs themselves, consequently bringing
[01:02:48.040 --> 01:02:53.040]  cartels, violence, smuggling and millions of tax dollars gone to waste.
[01:03:18.040 --> 01:03:33.600]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:33.600 --> 01:03:37.440]  We've got one more hour left in the show. That is four segments and we are talking with
[01:03:37.440 --> 01:03:41.960]  Tom in Maryland. All right, Tom, now before we went to break, you mentioned sending in
[01:03:41.960 --> 01:03:44.640]  notice requesting a trial, right?
[01:03:44.640 --> 01:03:46.000]  Correct.
[01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:51.240]  Why would you be requesting a trial when you're also at the same time saying, you don't have
[01:03:51.240 --> 01:03:54.640]  jurisdiction, you aren't a proper court?
[01:03:54.640 --> 01:04:01.520]  Right, right, right. That's why I'm asking you the question. Yeah, it doesn't make sense,
[01:04:01.520 --> 01:04:07.920]  so I'm not going to do that. I'm going to file a motion to dismiss and wait for a response.
[01:04:07.920 --> 01:04:09.360]  Of course, all certified.
[01:04:09.360 --> 01:04:14.480]  Well, not just a motion to dismiss, you're going to cite a motion to dismiss on several
[01:04:14.480 --> 01:04:23.080]  legal grounds. Improper, insufficient and untimely notice, improper notice of the nature
[01:04:23.080 --> 01:04:27.720]  and cause, even though that nature and cause has been demanded. My question is though,
[01:04:27.720 --> 01:04:33.400]  did you ever demand it in writing?
[01:04:33.400 --> 01:04:34.400]  Did I?
[01:04:34.400 --> 01:04:35.400]  I asked you first.
[01:04:35.400 --> 01:04:36.400]  No.
[01:04:36.400 --> 01:04:37.400]  Why not?
[01:04:37.400 --> 01:04:41.080]  Demand what?
[01:04:41.080 --> 01:04:42.980]  The nature and cause.
[01:04:42.980 --> 01:04:44.680]  I did not.
[01:04:44.680 --> 01:04:46.960]  So why not?
[01:04:46.960 --> 01:04:51.320]  I didn't know I had to.
[01:04:51.320 --> 01:04:55.760]  Didn't you just tell me you called down here and asked them, hey, what type of offense
[01:04:55.760 --> 01:05:02.400]  is this? Is it criminal? Is it civil? Is it civil infraction? Didn't you say you did that?
[01:05:02.400 --> 01:05:04.120]  They are difficult to deal with.
[01:05:04.120 --> 01:05:09.140]  Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Different answer to the wrong question.
[01:05:09.140 --> 01:05:11.040]  Didn't you tell me you did that?
[01:05:11.040 --> 01:05:12.080]  I did.
[01:05:12.080 --> 01:05:14.480]  Then why aren't you doing it in writing?
[01:05:14.480 --> 01:05:19.520]  I don't know. I will not.
[01:05:19.520 --> 01:05:24.040]  You file a motion demanding nature and cause.
[01:05:24.040 --> 01:05:26.000]  Okay.
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:28.320]  Okay.
[01:05:28.320 --> 01:05:34.400]  You file a motion to dismiss when they fail to provide proper nature and cause, which
[01:05:34.400 --> 01:05:39.000]  I'm quite sure the Maryland Constitution says, and their Code of Criminal Procedure, whatever
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:45.400]  it's actually called, says you have an absolute right to demand to be notified of.
[01:05:45.400 --> 01:05:47.600]  Excellent.
[01:05:47.600 --> 01:05:55.000]  Okay. Same thing about proper, sufficient, and timely notice of the charge itself. What
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:06:01.320]  constitutes a proper complaint that invests the court in Maryland with jurisdiction? If
[01:06:01.320 --> 01:06:06.360]  it's a civil infraction, there won't be a complaint. If it's criminal, there will be
[01:06:06.360 --> 01:06:07.360]  a complaint.
[01:06:07.360 --> 01:06:13.560]  See, this is when you know that things aren't the way they're supposed to be. Civil infraction
[01:06:13.560 --> 01:06:17.080]  and a finding of guilty, they don't go together.
[01:06:17.080 --> 01:06:18.080]  Okay?
[01:06:18.080 --> 01:06:19.080]  Yeah.
[01:06:19.080 --> 01:06:25.480]  Criminal offense, finding of liability, they don't go together.
[01:06:25.480 --> 01:06:27.120]  Correct.
[01:06:27.120 --> 01:06:32.480]  Okay. So when they tell you that it's civil infraction, but here's our criminal complaint,
[01:06:32.480 --> 01:06:34.480]  something's wrong.
[01:06:34.480 --> 01:06:35.480]  Right.
[01:06:35.480 --> 01:06:43.480]  So if it's civil, there has to be a proper cause of action filed by the plaintiff, right?
[01:06:43.480 --> 01:06:44.960]  Right.
[01:06:44.960 --> 01:06:47.240]  Was one filed if it was civil?
[01:06:47.240 --> 01:06:48.240]  No.
[01:06:48.240 --> 01:06:52.800]  Okay. If it's criminal, a proper complaint must be filed, right?
[01:06:52.800 --> 01:06:53.800]  Yes.
[01:06:53.800 --> 01:06:57.120]  Was one filed in accordance with the laws of Maryland?
[01:06:57.120 --> 01:06:58.120]  No.
[01:06:58.120 --> 01:07:04.600]  Then why are you asking for a trial on a court that has no jurisdiction to do a damn thing?
[01:07:04.600 --> 01:07:06.640]  Why not?
[01:07:06.640 --> 01:07:16.200]  Okay. And do your stuff in writing. Stop using the telephone. Stop using letters. Do it in
[01:07:16.200 --> 01:07:22.960]  writing through motions to the court. Prove the court is acting prejudicially and biasly
[01:07:22.960 --> 01:07:29.360]  against the accused and therefore could never give them a fair and impartial trial.
[01:07:29.360 --> 01:07:35.400]  Were you a trial instructor at Lackland?
[01:07:35.400 --> 01:07:39.880]  No, but I sure PO'd my fair share of them.
[01:07:39.880 --> 01:07:42.800]  Sure you did.
[01:07:42.800 --> 01:07:54.200]  In fact, my TI in, when I went through flight 182 or 142 and yeah, somewhere in hell, it's
[01:07:54.200 --> 01:07:59.640]  been so long, I can't remember. But in any case, he was about five foot and nothing and
[01:07:59.640 --> 01:08:03.560]  I'm six, three. And every time he wanted to get mad at me, he'd have to walk up and stick
[01:08:03.560 --> 01:08:07.040]  his little smokey to bare brim in my chest and say, Airman Craig, if you don't bend over
[01:08:07.040 --> 01:08:13.720]  where I can stick my hat in your eye, I'm going to pull a 341. And then years later,
[01:08:13.720 --> 01:08:20.640]  I got to smoke his butt right out there on a softball field in the middle of the base.
[01:08:20.640 --> 01:08:23.640]  What year did you go through?
[01:08:23.640 --> 01:08:26.640]  We might have been there the same year.
[01:08:26.640 --> 01:08:27.640]  That's possible.
[01:08:27.640 --> 01:08:32.280]  Well, we were definitely there the same year. I don't know if I can remember what flight
[01:08:32.280 --> 01:08:36.560]  I was in. I had to dig out my picture and find out.
[01:08:36.560 --> 01:08:42.640]  Yeah, I was. Yeah, I was. I've got the picture somewhere. I just don't have it here in Austin
[01:08:42.640 --> 01:08:44.640]  where I'm at. But yeah.
[01:08:44.640 --> 01:08:49.680]  Yeah. I was washing dishes Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year's.
[01:08:49.680 --> 01:08:52.920]  That sounds more like Army than Air Force. You must have really ticked somebody off.
[01:08:52.920 --> 01:08:55.560]  Didn't you do your turn in the mess hall?
[01:08:55.560 --> 01:09:01.640]  No, I never had mess hall. I was a squad leader. I did guard duty and all that other good stuff
[01:09:01.640 --> 01:09:04.240]  in the dorms and everywhere else.
[01:09:04.240 --> 01:09:12.200]  Well, I was getting, actually, I was pretty good. I got in trouble later on. But that's
[01:09:12.200 --> 01:09:13.200]  a whole other story.
[01:09:13.200 --> 01:09:18.400]  Well, I may have had some things in my favor. See, I found out a week before they did it
[01:09:18.400 --> 01:09:25.160]  that my TI and my first sergeant were conspiring to try to kick me out. They actually had it
[01:09:25.160 --> 01:09:29.520]  written. I got CQ duty one day with a bunch of guys from my flight. We were down there
[01:09:29.520 --> 01:09:33.320]  cleaning up everything. And I got assigned the first sergeant's office for cleaning.
[01:09:33.320 --> 01:09:39.400]  And on his desk blotter calendar, he had my name, my flight and said failed locker inspection
[01:09:39.400 --> 01:09:43.200]  on a date a week from that day.
[01:09:43.200 --> 01:09:47.360]  So they were conspiring to try to flunk me on my locker inspection before the locker
[01:09:47.360 --> 01:09:51.200]  inspection ever happened. I brought a bunch of the guys that were with me down there and
[01:09:51.200 --> 01:09:56.040]  I showed them everything on the calendar. We went upstairs and we locked up my locker
[01:09:56.040 --> 01:10:00.400]  tight as could be for inspection. There was nothing for them to find. They tore my locker
[01:10:00.400 --> 01:10:06.320]  up like a drug dog looking for a hamburger. But there was nothing for them to get. I ticked
[01:10:06.320 --> 01:10:08.760]  them off so bad it wasn't even funny.
[01:10:08.760 --> 01:10:15.280]  Wow. And you didn't feel any repercussions from that?
[01:10:15.280 --> 01:10:20.480]  Oh, he tried his best the whole time. This little five foot nothing dude named Kolupka.
[01:10:20.480 --> 01:10:24.080]  He did his best, but I wouldn't let him get away with it. Every time he threatened me
[01:10:24.080 --> 01:10:30.200]  with something, I'd just stand up there a foot above him and grin.
[01:10:30.200 --> 01:10:34.800]  Say you do your best, but there ain't nothing you can do to me that I don't let you.
[01:10:34.800 --> 01:10:40.360]  It's one of those things. It's like the little dog, the little dog syndrome.
[01:10:40.360 --> 01:10:41.360]  Yeah, exactly.
[01:10:41.360 --> 01:10:45.480]  They call that the Napoleon complex.
[01:10:45.480 --> 01:10:52.720]  Eddie, I believe in the value for value model. Is the only way to compensate you is sending
[01:10:52.720 --> 01:10:53.720]  a check?
[01:10:53.720 --> 01:10:58.920]  No, no. You can make donations online through the rule of law website or the Logos Radio
[01:10:58.920 --> 01:11:02.960]  Network website. If you go to the donations page, there's a gold button under my name
[01:11:02.960 --> 01:11:08.160]  where it says make a donation to Eddie. You can do it there as well over the internet,
[01:11:08.160 --> 01:11:12.640]  credit card, whatever. But if you do send me something in the mail and it's not cash
[01:11:12.640 --> 01:11:17.600]  or silver, don't put a name on it. Just put in the money amount and everything, but don't
[01:11:17.600 --> 01:11:18.600]  put a name on it.
[01:11:18.600 --> 01:11:19.600]  All right.
[01:11:19.600 --> 01:11:20.600]  Okay.
[01:11:20.600 --> 01:11:21.600]  All righty then.
[01:11:21.600 --> 01:11:26.200]  All right. Well, I appreciate the call in and get that stuff down in writing and get
[01:11:26.200 --> 01:11:31.280]  it filed ASAP, but don't be asking for a trial from somebody that has no authority to conduct
[01:11:31.280 --> 01:11:32.280]  one.
[01:11:32.280 --> 01:11:33.280]  Yes, sir.
[01:11:33.280 --> 01:11:34.280]  All right. Good luck.
[01:11:34.280 --> 01:11:35.280]  Bye.
[01:11:35.280 --> 01:11:36.280]  Bye-bye.
[01:11:36.280 --> 01:11:42.000]  All right. Now we have Alex in New York. Alex, what can we do for you?
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:44.000]  Hello, sir.
[01:11:44.000 --> 01:11:45.000]  Howdy.
[01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:52.680]  So I have two questions. One is about transportation. One is about a credit card.
[01:11:52.680 --> 01:11:58.520]  Okay. Well, I might can help with the first one. I don't know about the second one. We'll
[01:11:58.520 --> 01:11:59.520]  see.
[01:11:59.520 --> 01:12:08.080]  So far, I have heard that I think I'm in a jam because I'm actually a commercial driver.
[01:12:08.080 --> 01:12:14.080]  I drive like a taxi. So I have a commercial license, commercial license plate and a commercial
[01:12:14.080 --> 01:12:15.080]  insurance.
[01:12:15.080 --> 01:12:16.080]  Right.
[01:12:16.080 --> 01:12:24.000]  And I have gotten 11 tickets last year. Is there anything I can do?
[01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:25.000]  You're in New York?
[01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:30.720]  Yes, New York City.
[01:12:30.720 --> 01:12:34.800]  Well, if you're going to get that many tickets, consider changing occupations.
[01:12:34.800 --> 01:12:38.640]  True, true. But...
[01:12:38.640 --> 01:12:44.760]  The issue here is, is what can you do? And the thing is, is can you fight the tickets?
[01:12:44.760 --> 01:12:48.360]  Do you know how? Do you know how to prove they're wrong, they're false, they're lies
[01:12:48.360 --> 01:12:52.320]  or they don't apply? See, the question is, is it right to you to these tickets when you
[01:12:52.320 --> 01:12:56.680]  were on duty or off duty? If they wrote them to you while you were on duty, what was the
[01:12:56.680 --> 01:13:01.480]  alleged offense and what is the actual statutory criteria for committing that offense?
[01:13:01.480 --> 01:13:02.960]  Uh-huh.
[01:13:02.960 --> 01:13:08.160]  Okay. And what facts can you show that makes the officer a liar in making the allegation
[01:13:08.160 --> 01:13:10.320]  for that offense?
[01:13:10.320 --> 01:13:12.840]  Okay.
[01:13:12.840 --> 01:13:13.840]  Do you know any of this?
[01:13:13.840 --> 01:13:20.240]  I get that. I have been researching. I have read pretty much all of the material on your
[01:13:20.240 --> 01:13:22.720]  style of law blog.
[01:13:22.720 --> 01:13:27.840]  Okay. But now let me ask you a question in response to that. How much of the actual New
[01:13:27.840 --> 01:13:33.120]  York law relating to the citations you've got, have you read?
[01:13:33.120 --> 01:13:38.160]  Zero. I'm just in the process of doing that.
[01:13:38.160 --> 01:13:42.960]  Okay. Well, you better speed that process up if you've got 11 tickets.
[01:13:42.960 --> 01:13:49.760]  Yes, sir. One other question I had was, I heard a lot about the fact we talk about how
[01:13:49.760 --> 01:13:51.600]  speed matters are not criminal.
[01:13:51.600 --> 01:13:57.720]  No, no, no, no, no. In some states, they're criminal. In some states, they're not. You
[01:13:57.720 --> 01:14:02.520]  have to figure out which one of those conditions applies where you are to the particular offense
[01:14:02.520 --> 01:14:06.560]  that you allegedly committed.
[01:14:06.560 --> 01:14:12.280]  Because some states kind of mix them up. If you go X miles per hour over the speed limit,
[01:14:12.280 --> 01:14:16.600]  it's civil. But once you break a certain point, it becomes criminal and so on and so forth.
[01:14:16.600 --> 01:14:21.680]  So it can change mid-stride on you here. So you've got to know which one applies.
[01:14:21.680 --> 01:14:31.600]  But once I find out if they are not criminal, does the fact that I am a commercial entity
[01:14:31.600 --> 01:14:32.600]  change anything?
[01:14:32.600 --> 01:14:38.720]  No. It still means they have to fight fair. Whether you're commercial or not, they still
[01:14:38.720 --> 01:14:44.200]  have to fight fair. They have to play by the rules. Your job is to understand the rules
[01:14:44.200 --> 01:14:49.920]  just as well or better than they do and kick them in the teeth every time they break one.
[01:14:49.920 --> 01:14:54.560]  Just like they're trying to say you did when you got the citation.
[01:14:54.560 --> 01:15:01.360]  I see. Do I have any option to fight them by mail?
[01:15:01.360 --> 01:15:04.880]  I don't know. What does New York allow you to do in these cases?
[01:15:04.880 --> 01:15:15.360]  Okay. Got it. Got it. Okay. So my next step would be basically just to familiarize myself
[01:15:15.360 --> 01:15:17.120]  with the laws that...
[01:15:17.120 --> 01:15:25.160]  No. Your next task is to live and breathe those statutes, not familiarize yourself.
[01:15:25.160 --> 01:15:33.800]  Familiar can mean a lot of things. Okay? But it will never mean expert.
[01:15:33.800 --> 01:15:42.160]  Got it. Okay. So my next task is to know the laws that directly affect a particular ticket.
[01:15:42.160 --> 01:15:46.680]  That particular charge and your particular occupation would be a very smart choice.
[01:15:46.680 --> 01:15:50.320]  Okay. What would be the next move?
[01:15:50.320 --> 01:15:56.040]  The next move would figure out which rules you have to understand in addition to those
[01:15:56.040 --> 01:16:00.880]  for the court process, whether they be the civil rules or the criminal rules or a combination
[01:16:00.880 --> 01:16:04.160]  of both of those rules.
[01:16:04.160 --> 01:16:13.680]  Okay. Is there any material that I can use from you guys that will help me better understand
[01:16:13.680 --> 01:16:15.280]  the process?
[01:16:15.280 --> 01:16:21.880]  Again, without knowing what the actual process in New York is, I can't answer that.
[01:16:21.880 --> 01:16:22.880]  Okay.
[01:16:22.880 --> 01:16:29.360]  Okay. It really depends on whether or not it's civil or it's criminal and then what
[01:16:29.360 --> 01:16:35.680]  the specific procedures in that state are in relation to civil or criminal.
[01:16:35.680 --> 01:16:37.800]  Okay. Good luck.
[01:16:37.800 --> 01:16:47.000]  Okay. Well, if you'll hang on, I'll answer the credit card on the other side. I've got
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:49.200]  a break here and then I'll come back. Okay?
[01:16:49.200 --> 01:16:50.800]  Okay. Thanks, Eddie.
[01:16:50.800 --> 01:16:55.680]  All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. We got a little bit of time left, so y'all
[01:16:55.680 --> 01:16:56.680]  hang in there.
[01:16:56.680 --> 01:17:06.200]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network
[01:17:06.200 --> 01:17:10.720]  on top of the on-air talents, producers and other hardworking individuals working behind
[01:17:10.720 --> 01:17:11.720]  the scenes?
[01:17:11.720 --> 01:17:15.960]  Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners like you.
[01:17:15.960 --> 01:17:20.520]  We appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year on our annual fundraisers, which
[01:17:20.520 --> 01:17:23.600]  help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:17:23.600 --> 01:17:28.720]  Head on over to LogosRadioNetwork.com to make your contribution. Every $25 donation
[01:17:28.720 --> 01:17:33.200]  enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks. The first prize being
[01:17:33.200 --> 01:17:36.880]  a Spiked Skull Lower Receiver, second prize being a Taurus Curve.
[01:17:36.880 --> 01:17:41.520]  Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor. And if you donate your $25 contribution
[01:17:41.520 --> 01:17:46.720]  early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud. Donations by all major
[01:17:46.720 --> 01:17:50.360]  credit cards are accepted as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[01:17:50.360 --> 01:17:55.280]  The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser. Head on over to LogosRadioNetwork.com for more information
[01:17:55.280 --> 01:17:58.600]  and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:17:58.600 --> 01:18:05.200]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:18:05.200 --> 01:18:09.760]  of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time
[01:18:09.760 --> 01:18:16.000]  we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment
[01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:21.720]  is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and
[01:18:21.720 --> 01:18:27.840]  mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests
[01:18:27.840 --> 01:18:32.800]  to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust young
[01:18:32.800 --> 01:18:39.280]  Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many
[01:18:39.280 --> 01:18:45.960]  others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:18:45.960 --> 01:18:51.680]  quality radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:51.680 --> 01:18:57.200]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:18:57.200 --> 01:19:00.200]  increase your income. Order now.
[01:19:00.200 --> 01:19:17.200]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:17.200 --> 01:19:41.720]  All right, folks, we are back and we're still talking with Alex in New York. All right,
[01:19:41.720 --> 01:19:47.520]  Alex, what can we do for you? Let's get back on that credit card question.
[01:19:47.520 --> 01:19:52.720]  The second issue has to do with my girlfriend. She's on the line with-
[01:19:52.720 --> 01:19:56.520]  You didn't get her with a credit card, did you?
[01:19:56.520 --> 01:20:06.640]  No. So what happened was she was with another person and this guy took out $45,000 on her
[01:20:06.640 --> 01:20:14.520]  credit card and they went through a messy divorce, but she ended up owning the credit
[01:20:14.520 --> 01:20:20.000]  card, so she's stuck with it right now. So she's trying to see if there's any way she
[01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:25.200]  can fight back, dismiss it or what have you.
[01:20:25.200 --> 01:20:29.640]  Well, how did she manage to allow herself to wind up with the credit card debt if it
[01:20:29.640 --> 01:20:33.080]  was his?
[01:20:33.080 --> 01:20:38.640]  It was her credit card, she had- Okay, not my point. I fully understand it's
[01:20:38.640 --> 01:20:43.680]  her credit card, but he took out the money on it, allegedly, right?
[01:20:43.680 --> 01:20:52.440]  Yeah, because he was an authorized user. Okay. Then the question there becomes, in the divorce,
[01:20:52.440 --> 01:20:55.280]  why did she accept the debt on the card?
[01:20:55.280 --> 01:21:00.800]  That's a long story. Okay. But the problem is it's a long story
[01:21:00.800 --> 01:21:03.400]  that she agreed to, right?
[01:21:03.400 --> 01:21:05.800]  Yes, yes, she did. Okay.
[01:21:05.800 --> 01:21:08.640]  She technically owns it, it's her debt.
[01:21:08.640 --> 01:21:16.320]  Yeah, there ain't no technically to it. If she agreed to accept the debt on the card
[01:21:16.320 --> 01:21:22.160]  in the divorce, it's hers. There ain't no technical anymore. It was only technical and
[01:21:22.160 --> 01:21:27.040]  if it was disputed and he was the one that did it and she didn't, then it's not technical
[01:21:27.040 --> 01:21:28.040]  anymore.
[01:21:28.040 --> 01:21:36.840]  I agree. But I heard on some of the other shows, the guys talk about how people fought
[01:21:36.840 --> 01:21:38.840]  them and-
[01:21:38.840 --> 01:21:44.440]  Well, the question here is one, fought them based upon their attempt to collect it through
[01:21:44.440 --> 01:21:50.440]  unlawful means. That's one thing, okay? That's what these people are fighting, a debt that
[01:21:50.440 --> 01:21:58.480]  pops up out of nowhere, or that the debt collector did not follow proper legal procedure to attempt
[01:21:58.480 --> 01:22:04.120]  to collect in compliance with federal law. That's what these people are talking about,
[01:22:04.120 --> 01:22:05.120]  fighting.
[01:22:05.120 --> 01:22:09.400]  And the ones that are talking about just getting out of paying what you assumed as a rightful
[01:22:09.400 --> 01:22:15.000]  debt, well, those are crooks. Those are con men, okay?
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:17.520]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:22:17.520 --> 01:22:23.640]  So the thing about it is, while she might be able to do it if someone made an illegal
[01:22:23.640 --> 01:22:29.320]  attempt to collect the debt and she challenged them on it and took them to court and won,
[01:22:29.320 --> 01:22:32.480]  she might actually get more out of them than they could get out of her and thus cancel
[01:22:32.480 --> 01:22:42.680]  it all out. But she assumed the debt willingly in the divorce, it's hers.
[01:22:42.680 --> 01:22:50.520]  So if she stops paying it, that's her prerogative. But it can lawfully affect her credit score
[01:22:50.520 --> 01:22:56.880]  as long as the debt collector and the reporting agency complies with federal law in doing
[01:22:56.880 --> 01:23:07.280]  so. It's when they do not, that she will then have something to go after them for, okay?
[01:23:07.280 --> 01:23:13.160]  The three things you need to be aware of in federal law is the FDCPA, the Fair Debt Collection
[01:23:13.160 --> 01:23:20.920]  Practices Act, the Fair Debt Credit Reporting Act, and the Federal Telephony Act.
[01:23:20.920 --> 01:23:28.720]  Those three acts spell out how a debt collector must operate their business. And failure to
[01:23:28.720 --> 01:23:35.100]  comply with that law results in punitive monetary penalties that the person they are attempting
[01:23:35.100 --> 01:23:44.160]  to collect from has every right to sue and receive, provided they also do what needs
[01:23:44.160 --> 01:23:51.920]  to be done to be able to prove up that the debt collection company violated the rules.
[01:23:51.920 --> 01:23:58.120]  So if she stops paying and the collection calls and letters start coming, she needs
[01:23:58.120 --> 01:24:03.680]  to know what the FDCPA says about how they can communicate and what they must communicate,
[01:24:03.680 --> 01:24:08.640]  when they communicate, everything they must say and everything they must do. And every
[01:24:08.640 --> 01:24:12.880]  time they don't do it, she keeps a log of that. Every time they do it incorrectly, she
[01:24:12.880 --> 01:24:18.320]  keeps a log of that. When she gets several violations worth a few thousand dollars or
[01:24:18.320 --> 01:24:23.320]  more, she can file suit, and then she can turn around and start negotiating with them
[01:24:23.320 --> 01:24:28.440]  over the alleged credit card debt versus the alleged collection of that debt and how much
[01:24:28.440 --> 01:24:30.440]  they now owe her.
[01:24:30.440 --> 01:24:41.160]  Okay, she has stopped paying and they're attempting to serve her right now, right? Yeah, they're
[01:24:41.160 --> 01:24:44.040]  trying to take her to court right now.
[01:24:44.040 --> 01:24:47.360]  Okay, which they're allowed to do.
[01:24:47.360 --> 01:24:56.040]  Yes. She was the strategy of avoiding the service for what?
[01:24:56.040 --> 01:25:01.760]  Well, okay, here's the problem. You're in New York, right? Yeah. And she's in New York,
[01:25:01.760 --> 01:25:02.760]  right?
[01:25:02.760 --> 01:25:06.320]  She's right. Yeah, she's listening on the line.
[01:25:06.320 --> 01:25:10.600]  Right. And the service is attempting to be performed in New York, right?
[01:25:10.600 --> 01:25:11.920]  Correct.
[01:25:11.920 --> 01:25:17.680]  Does New York make it a crime to avoid lawful process, service of process?
[01:25:17.680 --> 01:25:19.680]  No.
[01:25:19.680 --> 01:25:22.480]  You're positive or are you just giving me an answer?
[01:25:22.480 --> 01:25:26.200]  Are you positive? Yeah, she's positive.
[01:25:26.200 --> 01:25:30.960]  Okay. If it's not a crime to avoid process, then you can play dodgeball for as long as
[01:25:30.960 --> 01:25:34.160]  it works. Eventually though, you're going to get tired.
[01:25:34.160 --> 01:25:44.520]  Okay. Well, we're going to move to LA in a few months, so that is going to complicate
[01:25:44.520 --> 01:25:46.520]  things further.
[01:25:46.520 --> 01:25:49.920]  Maybe it will, maybe it won't. There's nothing to stop them from paying a process server
[01:25:49.920 --> 01:25:53.280]  in California to do the exact same thing, and then haul her all the way back to New
[01:25:53.280 --> 01:25:56.600]  York to go to court or lose.
[01:25:56.600 --> 01:25:58.960]  True, true.
[01:25:58.960 --> 01:26:04.280]  So you're looking at potentially increasing your costs exponentially here, not only by
[01:26:04.280 --> 01:26:08.960]  not paying the card, but now having to continuously travel back and forth to New York for court
[01:26:08.960 --> 01:26:09.960]  appearances.
[01:26:09.960 --> 01:26:17.720]  Yes, that is true. We're not moving to avoid this, we're just moving because we have to
[01:26:17.720 --> 01:26:18.720]  know.
[01:26:18.720 --> 01:26:22.720]  Well, I wasn't assuming either way on that. I'm just saying that that's part of the problem
[01:26:22.720 --> 01:26:25.520]  you're going to run into.
[01:26:25.520 --> 01:26:29.720]  So you have to weigh your options here. If you go to court with them, are you likely
[01:26:29.720 --> 01:26:32.840]  to win or are you more likely to lose?
[01:26:32.840 --> 01:26:37.520]  If you're more likely to lose and you know that you properly owed it to begin with, if
[01:26:37.520 --> 01:26:44.040]  they'll negotiate down to a portion of what you owe or lay off any penalties for late
[01:26:44.040 --> 01:26:48.000]  fees and all that other kind of stuff, if you'll take back up the payments, that's something
[01:26:48.000 --> 01:26:53.760]  you can negotiate. Any of that's possible. You just have to talk to them to find out.
[01:26:53.760 --> 01:27:00.280]  But eventually they're going to get you served. And then the day you don't show up for court,
[01:27:00.280 --> 01:27:01.960]  they win.
[01:27:01.960 --> 01:27:08.320]  Okay. What happens if they don't serve and they start...
[01:27:08.320 --> 01:27:13.400]  It all depends upon what the law of New York says about that. If a debt collector can prove
[01:27:13.400 --> 01:27:19.400]  that they have attempted proper service numerous times, for instance, if the law says this
[01:27:19.400 --> 01:27:25.400]  is how they can operate, if they say, let's say if the debt collector attempts to process
[01:27:25.400 --> 01:27:30.280]  the service on three different occasions in three places where the individual is known
[01:27:30.280 --> 01:27:36.840]  to have lived, worked, or last been known to reside, then the debt collector may proceed
[01:27:36.840 --> 01:27:40.800]  with the suit even in the absence of the defendant.
[01:27:40.800 --> 01:27:44.800]  The law could very well be written that way. I don't know. You need to find out.
[01:27:44.800 --> 01:27:50.120]  Yes, definitely. Okay. Thanks, Eddie.
[01:27:50.120 --> 01:27:51.120]  You're welcome.
[01:27:51.120 --> 01:27:52.120]  Thanks for the clarity.
[01:27:52.120 --> 01:27:57.560]  Yes, sir. Y'all have a good night and good luck.
[01:27:57.560 --> 01:27:58.560]  Thank you, sir.
[01:27:58.560 --> 01:27:59.560]  All right. Bye-bye.
[01:27:59.560 --> 01:28:06.800]  Okay. Now we are going to go to Oliver in Tennessee. Oliver, what can we do for you?
[01:28:06.800 --> 01:28:08.400]  How you doing, Eddie?
[01:28:08.400 --> 01:28:11.800]  I'm doing all right so far. Let's see here how you're doing.
[01:28:11.800 --> 01:28:18.640]  I'm doing pretty good. All I've been taking a hit about on file with the city, file a claim
[01:28:18.640 --> 01:28:19.640]  against the city insurance.
[01:28:19.640 --> 01:28:20.640]  Yeah.
[01:28:20.640 --> 01:28:26.200]  It was pretty easy than I thought. I called City Hall, called around, they sent me to the
[01:28:26.200 --> 01:28:30.840]  Human Resources, and I talked to the guy. He was an attorney. He didn't file a suit,
[01:28:30.840 --> 01:28:32.840]  and I'm waiting to hear a response.
[01:28:32.840 --> 01:28:34.840]  Well, you didn't file a suit. You filed a claim.
[01:28:34.840 --> 01:28:39.120]  I'm going to file a claim. I'm waiting to hear a response back now.
[01:28:39.120 --> 01:28:40.120]  Okay. Well.
[01:28:40.120 --> 01:28:42.440]  He seemed real interested in it.
[01:28:42.440 --> 01:28:48.280]  Yeah, but here's the way that works. Just so you're aware, I'm hoping it doesn't, but
[01:28:48.280 --> 01:28:56.840]  in case it does, pay attention to the following. They're going to first make it appear hopeful
[01:28:56.840 --> 01:29:03.000]  that you're going to win your claim. Then they're going to say, oh, we've encountered
[01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:07.880]  new information that alters the fact pattern and thus makes it appear that everything was
[01:29:07.880 --> 01:29:08.880]  done properly.
[01:29:08.880 --> 01:29:15.560]  So we're going to deny your claim. Okay. And I'm just telling you this because if and when
[01:29:15.560 --> 01:29:21.480]  that happens, which it usually does, not always, but usually you're not so surprised and angry
[01:29:21.480 --> 01:29:26.000]  about it because it's very likely to happen. They hate to pay. And they know for a fact
[01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  that most people cannot afford the trip to court to make them pay. Okay. Or even know
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:38.120]  the proper way to take them to court to make them pay. So just expect that, be ready for
[01:29:38.120 --> 01:29:43.480]  that and get your lawsuit written up, regardless of what they tell you. Have it on standby
[01:29:43.480 --> 01:29:44.760]  and ready to go.
[01:29:44.760 --> 01:29:47.040]  Right. I'm writing it up now.
[01:29:47.040 --> 01:29:51.480]  Okay. Hang on just a second. We'll let you finish up on this on the other side. All right,
[01:29:51.480 --> 01:29:56.040]  folks, rule of law radio, half an hour to go. So y'all hang in there and we'll be right
[01:29:56.040 --> 01:29:59.040]  back with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:29:59.040 --> 01:30:07.040]  Did you know the majority of businesses in the U.S. are family owned? We're not just
[01:30:07.040 --> 01:30:11.680]  talking mom and pop stores, but companies at the very top of the corporate ladder. I'm
[01:30:11.680 --> 01:30:16.520]  Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the top family businesses next.
[01:30:16.520 --> 01:30:21.040]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[01:30:21.040 --> 01:30:26.840]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.840 --> 01:30:33.080]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:30:33.080 --> 01:30:38.160]  it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private
[01:30:38.160 --> 01:30:45.600]  search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.600 --> 01:30:50.520]  When it comes to business, blood and money really do mix. A whopping 8 out of 10 American
[01:30:50.520 --> 01:30:55.480]  businesses are family owned. They contribute nearly 60 percent of the nation's economy
[01:30:55.480 --> 01:31:01.360]  and employ nearly two-thirds of the U.S. workforce. Many of the firms in the S&P 500 are family
[01:31:01.360 --> 01:31:06.080]  controlled and they're doing great. They're more stable and they inspire more commitment
[01:31:06.080 --> 01:31:08.120]  and trust in their employees.
[01:31:08.120 --> 01:31:14.880]  The biggest family owned business is, surprise, Walmart. Next comes Ford, Cargill, Coke Industries,
[01:31:14.880 --> 01:31:20.120]  Carlson Companies, Comcast and News Corp. Rounding out the top 10 is the sweetest of
[01:31:20.120 --> 01:31:26.000]  them all, Mars. M&M's anyone? I've got your Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the
[01:31:26.000 --> 01:31:31.680]  world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.680 --> 01:31:37.040]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:37.040 --> 01:31:42.480]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[01:31:42.480 --> 01:31:46.400]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their
[01:31:46.400 --> 01:31:50.960]  lives and thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.960 --> 01:31:54.120]  I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force
[01:31:54.120 --> 01:31:59.160]  pilot. I'm the father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to
[01:31:59.160 --> 01:32:01.200]  RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.200 --> 01:32:05.280]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or
[01:32:05.280 --> 01:32:09.080]  wind damage from the recent storms? Come on, we all know the government caused it with
[01:32:09.080 --> 01:32:13.080]  their chem trails, but good luck getting them to pay for it. Okay, I might be kidding about
[01:32:13.080 --> 01:32:17.080]  the chem trails, but I'm serious about your roof. That's why you have insurance and Hill
[01:32:17.080 --> 01:32:21.920]  Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense
[01:32:21.920 --> 01:32:26.320]  and we accept Bitcoin. As a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with
[01:32:26.320 --> 01:32:30.920]  zero complaints, you can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and
[01:32:30.920 --> 01:32:39.320]  your roof right the first time. Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com,
[01:32:39.320 --> 01:32:44.120]  mention the crypto show and get $100 off and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio
[01:32:44.120 --> 01:32:49.200]  Network to help continue this programming. So if those out of town roofers come knocking,
[01:32:49.200 --> 01:32:57.920]  your door should be locking. That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts
[01:32:57.920 --> 01:33:04.800]  are based on full roof replacement. May not actually be kidding about chem trails.
[01:33:04.800 --> 01:33:11.800]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:34.800 --> 01:33:57.120]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio and we are talking to Oliver
[01:33:57.120 --> 01:33:59.600]  in Tennessee. All right, Oliver, please continue.
[01:33:59.600 --> 01:34:05.200]  Actually, I was waiting for you to finish. You were telling me about what to expect.
[01:34:05.200 --> 01:34:10.640]  Yeah. You said you had your lawsuit written up on right now, right? So that's good. Just
[01:34:10.640 --> 01:34:14.640]  be prepared for this because what's going to happen is if they do deny it, you're going
[01:34:14.640 --> 01:34:19.960]  to have to then turn around and say, that's fine. You denied it. Now, exhausted administrative
[01:34:19.960 --> 01:34:24.520]  process. Here we go. And you can then go ahead and file a suit and you're on your way.
[01:34:24.520 --> 01:34:32.480]  Okay. Going through the suit, I've been remembering everything I've been hearing from you since
[01:34:32.480 --> 01:34:37.800]  I've been listening to you. And going through the suit, I go through all these cases and
[01:34:37.800 --> 01:34:45.160]  listen to the briefs and understand why people are not getting the point across and why they
[01:34:45.160 --> 01:34:54.000]  get remanded or don't, they lose their case. So I was going back through the codes, the
[01:34:54.000 --> 01:35:01.320]  statutes of my things off and I started finding things. I'm not going to spoil everything
[01:35:01.320 --> 01:35:05.400]  now because I want everybody else to get a chance, but I found this one that is very
[01:35:05.400 --> 01:35:12.040]  interesting in the TTA, it's a motor and other vehicles, the transportation section.
[01:35:12.040 --> 01:35:13.040]  Right.
[01:35:13.040 --> 01:35:18.080]  And in the definitions, I'm amazed. I just started with the definition, reading all the
[01:35:18.080 --> 01:35:26.000]  definitions and I found something called special mobile vehicle, I mean, special mobile equipment.
[01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:34.120]  The definition is special mobile equipment means every vehicle not designed, used primarily
[01:35:34.120 --> 01:35:43.360]  for the transportation of persons or property and only incidentally operated or moved over
[01:35:43.360 --> 01:35:51.440]  a highway or street, including, but not limited to ditches, apparatus and road construction
[01:35:51.440 --> 01:36:02.040]  and maintenance machinery, such as as spreaders, ammunition mixers, bucket loaders, basically
[01:36:02.040 --> 01:36:05.080]  everything that don't carry goods in person.
[01:36:05.080 --> 01:36:10.080]  Well, no, no, no. The description of everything you're given is something more like a farm
[01:36:10.080 --> 01:36:16.920]  tractor or a piece of road equipment or that type of deal. All right. Remember what is
[01:36:16.920 --> 01:36:25.800]  the, what was the very first part of that definition, not designed to, okay. Normally,
[01:36:25.800 --> 01:36:30.880]  every one of these things you're talking about can only hold one person at a time period
[01:36:30.880 --> 01:36:31.880]  and no others
[01:36:31.880 --> 01:36:45.480]  Okay. And they move, they don't, aren't primarily for moving upon the highway. You can't say
[01:36:45.480 --> 01:36:49.640]  that about your car. You can only say that about these particular types of equipment.
[01:36:49.640 --> 01:36:53.720]  You don't see them going down the highway on a regular basis as a daily car, do you?
[01:36:53.720 --> 01:37:04.000]  Okay. So don't read into something that's what's not there and don't omit something
[01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:14.480]  that is. It's the same thing like these morons that call their car a road machine. They've
[01:37:14.480 --> 01:37:20.040]  obviously never bothered to look up the definition of a road machine. A road machine is actually
[01:37:20.040 --> 01:37:27.120]  a specific type of machine that was designed to both grind up, melt down and relay asphalt
[01:37:27.120 --> 01:37:29.560]  on a road that's being built.
[01:37:29.560 --> 01:37:38.400]  Okay. So is a safe way to go about saying your car is personal property?
[01:37:38.400 --> 01:37:44.120]  That's one way to go about it. Yeah. It is personal property. The courts have tried to
[01:37:44.120 --> 01:37:50.320]  say that there is no property interest in a vehicle used upon the highway. That what
[01:37:50.320 --> 01:37:56.720]  they're not drawing the distinction between is a vehicle as in commerce, there's no property
[01:37:56.720 --> 01:38:03.360]  interest because of the way it's using the road. But that's not true of a private individual
[01:38:03.360 --> 01:38:11.220]  who isn't engaging in that type of use of the road. There is a property interest there.
[01:38:11.220 --> 01:38:15.240]  The courts know this, but they always try to find a way to go back to the commercial
[01:38:15.240 --> 01:38:20.880]  aspect of the terminology rather than the non-commercial. And most people oblige them
[01:38:20.880 --> 01:38:27.040]  by making a mistake of association at some point in the proceeding.
[01:38:27.040 --> 01:38:31.560]  They either refer to their own car as a vehicle, they refer to their own activity as driving
[01:38:31.560 --> 01:38:35.840]  or they produced one of the accouterments at the traffic stop or they go directly to the
[01:38:35.840 --> 01:38:41.600]  subject matter during trial. Any one of those things puts you within that box where you
[01:38:41.600 --> 01:38:47.920]  don't want to be. And that's what gives the court the out it needs to write the case law
[01:38:47.920 --> 01:39:01.040]  that it does. Okay. So there's no safe outlet from the vehicle? No. Vehicle is one of their
[01:39:01.040 --> 01:39:11.360]  terms. What's the term we use? Car. Car. Automobile. You can use automobile, you can use car unless
[01:39:11.360 --> 01:39:18.080]  the statute specifically defines automobile, does it? No. If you will look, you will find
[01:39:18.080 --> 01:39:31.760]  that the definition of vehicle almost always says a device used or designed for. Okay.
[01:39:31.760 --> 01:39:40.360]  Okay. All right. So just expect that, be prepared for it and go get them. How about if they
[01:39:40.360 --> 01:39:46.880]  do cash out? If they do say, okay, we're settling, but we only see this much damage. Well, that's
[01:39:46.880 --> 01:39:50.640]  up to you whether or not you wish to accept it. Nothing says you have to accept what they
[01:39:50.640 --> 01:40:00.240]  offer. You can either try to negotiate with them or turn them down and let them try to
[01:40:00.240 --> 01:40:14.000]  negotiate with you. Okay. All right. All right. Bye bye. Now we're going to go to Charles
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:27.080]  in Washington. Charles, what can we do for you? Hello, Charles. All right. Charles is
[01:40:27.080 --> 01:40:31.480]  not available at the moment it would appear. So let's move to the next one in line. Steve
[01:40:31.480 --> 01:40:39.960]  in Florida. Steve, what can we do for you? Hello, Steve. Hi, Eddie. Hi. Yes. Hello, Eddie.
[01:40:39.960 --> 01:40:45.800]  Hi, this is Steven, California. I had the criminal case in Florida. Okay. I'm currently
[01:40:45.800 --> 01:40:54.080]  transcribing the 911 calls into the appropriate form, i.e. notarized and sworn. I have a question
[01:40:54.080 --> 01:41:01.280]  regarding these, what appears to be edits in the 911 audio. For instance, I read in
[01:41:01.280 --> 01:41:10.400]  the Florida statute that these might be to cover the caller's name and identifying information
[01:41:10.400 --> 01:41:15.040]  address type of thing. Does the context of the speech before and after give you that
[01:41:15.040 --> 01:41:22.240]  impression about these edits? One of them does, but not all five. Okay. The other five
[01:41:22.240 --> 01:41:28.160]  make me think that things were edited out in order to transform the audio into what
[01:41:28.160 --> 01:41:32.720]  I believe is taking place here. Okay. Then what you may have to do is file discovery
[01:41:32.720 --> 01:41:40.080]  for an unredacted version, unedited, unredacted. Okay. But to the point, during this transcription
[01:41:40.080 --> 01:41:45.720]  that I'm doing, how should I notate something? I put in dash dash question mark edited out
[01:41:45.720 --> 01:41:50.760]  question mark dash dash. Should I put something else and have it notarized? Whatever you need
[01:41:50.760 --> 01:41:55.920]  to let you know that something's not right there, how you annotate that to yourself.
[01:41:55.920 --> 01:42:01.080]  These are not official transcripts, so to speak. They're just... You can put edited
[01:42:01.080 --> 01:42:09.280]  question mark, whatever. You can put edit dash missing information question mark.
[01:42:09.280 --> 01:42:16.640]  Yes, sir. What's absolutely interesting to me is I now have reason to believe in my mind
[01:42:16.640 --> 01:42:22.880]  that I'm listening to edits out, which actually make me believe that this is not the nosy
[01:42:22.880 --> 01:42:28.440]  lady that I said mind your own business to, but someone that she and her husband asked
[01:42:28.440 --> 01:42:32.800]  to make the call for them, and that this person did not see anything, but they did have eyes
[01:42:32.800 --> 01:42:36.400]  on us from the time that they test her with watching us.
[01:42:36.400 --> 01:42:41.360]  Okay. Well, unless you have information about the idea of the person on the phone, you can't
[01:42:41.360 --> 01:42:45.280]  show that one way or the other. Your presumption is not admissible.
[01:42:45.280 --> 01:42:51.120]  Okay. Will discovery... So is it true that... Am I thinking correctly that my attorneys
[01:42:51.120 --> 01:42:55.800]  will have her information, but I'm not privy to that name of that...
[01:42:55.800 --> 01:43:00.120]  That's not necessarily true. The person that made the call may not be the person that's
[01:43:00.120 --> 01:43:06.920]  the witness. So I don't know if your attorney will get their information or not, or even
[01:43:06.920 --> 01:43:12.040]  consider it relevant. Right. There's a few things in here they might
[01:43:12.040 --> 01:43:15.200]  not consider it relevant, but I think it might very well be.
[01:43:15.200 --> 01:43:20.760]  Well, without the information that appears to be missing, if any is missing, you don't
[01:43:20.760 --> 01:43:25.480]  really know that for sure. So you need to get an unredacted, unedited version.
[01:43:25.480 --> 01:43:34.200]  Okay. Thank you. Now, if my attorneys told me that two charges were dropped, the domestic
[01:43:34.200 --> 01:43:39.920]  violence and the failures to show ID, how do I get proof of that it's been dropped?
[01:43:39.920 --> 01:43:42.120]  And can they... Because there'll be an order for it. Tell
[01:43:42.120 --> 01:43:46.880]  them you want the judicial order or the prosecutorial dismissal of those charges.
[01:43:46.880 --> 01:43:49.920]  Okay. All right. Hang on just a second, Steve. I
[01:43:49.920 --> 01:43:54.400]  got a break coming up here. All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. We got one more
[01:43:54.400 --> 01:44:00.400]  segment. Y'all hang in there. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.400 --> 01:44:04.040]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.040 --> 01:44:06.640]  Boring! Are you confused by words like the Constitution
[01:44:06.640 --> 01:44:08.320]  or the Federal Reserve? What?
[01:44:08.320 --> 01:44:12.640]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:12.640 --> 01:44:18.080]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt. And like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity
[01:44:18.080 --> 01:44:22.800]  at an early age. I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost
[01:44:22.800 --> 01:44:28.200]  every home in America, the television. Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching
[01:44:28.200 --> 01:44:32.760]  stupidity. But there is hope. The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands
[01:44:32.760 --> 01:44:37.240]  of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover. And because of Brave New
[01:44:37.240 --> 01:44:42.840]  Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:42.840 --> 01:44:50.720]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.720 --> 01:44:54.800]  or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:54.800 --> 01:44:58.160]  Side effects when using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[01:44:58.160 --> 01:45:04.560]  and an overall increase in mental functioning. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.560 --> 01:45:10.120]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy to understand,
[01:45:10.120 --> 01:45:17.320]  or CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer,
[01:45:17.320 --> 01:45:21.760]  know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should
[01:45:21.760 --> 01:45:28.240]  do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.240 --> 01:45:35.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:39.640]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[01:45:39.640 --> 01:45:44.760]  principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio
[01:45:44.760 --> 01:45:51.720]  classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much
[01:45:51.720 --> 01:46:14.720]  more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:14.720 --> 01:46:44.680]  All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking
[01:46:44.680 --> 01:46:48.000]  to Charles in Washington. All right, Charles, please continue.
[01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:51.320]  Okay. I'm here. Can you hear me, Eddie?
[01:46:51.320 --> 01:46:52.320]  Yeah.
[01:46:52.320 --> 01:46:53.320]  Eddie?
[01:46:53.320 --> 01:46:54.320]  Yeah.
[01:46:54.320 --> 01:46:55.320]  Can you hear me now?
[01:46:55.320 --> 01:46:56.320]  I can hear you.
[01:46:56.320 --> 01:46:59.320]  I was on the phone, so somebody's there to talk about call. I get blocked. Okay, anyway,
[01:46:59.320 --> 01:47:03.040]  I've still been receiving information from you, and I've been looking at my email address
[01:47:03.040 --> 01:47:08.520]  book on that, taking an e-mail stuff. And then the last time I was on the phone with
[01:47:08.520 --> 01:47:13.640]  you on the radio, you mentioned to a gentleman by having a Mercedes, but he didn't have a
[01:47:13.640 --> 01:47:18.040]  camera. And the camera I've been looking for is the one that you sent. It's just taking
[01:47:18.040 --> 01:47:22.400]  photographs where it can be also transmitted back to the home base, laptop.
[01:47:22.400 --> 01:47:28.200]  Well, you want one that can be live streamed back. And just FYI, Steve, I know I was talking
[01:47:28.200 --> 01:47:31.840]  to you before, but I decided to check on Charles when we got back just in case. So Steve, hang
[01:47:31.840 --> 01:47:34.480]  on. I'm not done with you yet. All right, go ahead, Charles.
[01:47:34.480 --> 01:47:35.480]  Do you want to go back to them, please?
[01:47:35.480 --> 01:47:38.720]  No, no, no. Go ahead. Go ahead. I just want to make sure you were there.
[01:47:38.720 --> 01:47:39.720]  Okay.
[01:47:39.720 --> 01:47:44.400]  Yeah, okay. Yeah, because I was here. And so I was calling because I was trying to get
[01:47:44.400 --> 01:47:51.880]  the class that was the $250 that I think I got at radiolaw.com and the jurisdiction
[01:47:51.880 --> 01:47:58.520]  that I got. And then I was trying to make sure I wanted to put some money for the support.
[01:47:58.520 --> 01:48:02.720]  And my friend who does was the former shoot out of town. So I was trying to call to get
[01:48:02.720 --> 01:48:04.720]  that information again, too.
[01:48:04.720 --> 01:48:09.520]  Get which information, Charles?
[01:48:09.520 --> 01:48:13.960]  The information. Oh, the information we talked about before was when I came out of my car
[01:48:13.960 --> 01:48:18.280]  and I was trying to register my vehicles, he was going to send it to me. You had to
[01:48:18.280 --> 01:48:20.000]  look it up. It was...
[01:48:20.000 --> 01:48:21.600]  You're talking about the Washington stuff?
[01:48:21.600 --> 01:48:22.600]  Yeah.
[01:48:22.600 --> 01:48:23.600]  Yeah.
[01:48:23.600 --> 01:48:28.240]  Yeah, I haven't seen the email from you. I looked for the email the night that I last
[01:48:28.240 --> 01:48:33.440]  talked to you, but I haven't seen an email come up. So what? I don't know. What name
[01:48:33.440 --> 01:48:35.000]  are you using on the email?
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:40.720]  It was Charles White or Nikki Hodge, but it should have been Charles White.
[01:48:40.720 --> 01:48:42.800]  Yeah. I don't have a...
[01:48:42.800 --> 01:48:49.600]  Give me your email to get out and make sure I'm sending it to the right one.
[01:48:49.600 --> 01:48:52.600]  Eddie, E-D-D-I-E at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:48:52.600 --> 01:48:58.000]  And that's what I get. That's what I get. That's why I sent it to you.
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:02.280]  Yeah. I've got a Charles Shoemate and I've got a Charles Weidman, but I don't have a
[01:49:02.280 --> 01:49:05.200]  Charles White in my email anywhere.
[01:49:05.200 --> 01:49:12.160]  Okay. I'll try to send it again. So on this camera, where do I purchase that particular
[01:49:12.160 --> 01:49:14.160]  camera? I thought you mentioned to the guy...
[01:49:14.160 --> 01:49:18.240]  Well, the camera I talked about putting in for a friend of mine was a GoPro. You can
[01:49:18.240 --> 01:49:21.760]  get it at Walmart. You can get it at Best Buy. You can get it online. You can get it
[01:49:21.760 --> 01:49:23.880]  pretty much anywhere. It's a sports camera.
[01:49:23.880 --> 01:49:29.960]  Sports camera. Okay. And at Walmart, they have like 200 something bucks.
[01:49:29.960 --> 01:49:34.080]  No, no, no, no. They're not 200 something bucks. The ones that would depend upon which
[01:49:34.080 --> 01:49:39.080]  one you get, they're anywhere from three to 400 bucks, but they do the job and then some.
[01:49:39.080 --> 01:49:45.280]  Okay. And that's what I want. I don't care about that. So, okay, I got that. I had a
[01:49:45.280 --> 01:49:50.960]  case going on with... When I first started calling about me backing out, it was called
[01:49:50.960 --> 01:49:55.800]  improper backing. And I back it to a gentleman where the person never came to court. The
[01:49:55.800 --> 01:50:01.520]  officers never came to court all the times that I went. And at the trial hearing, the
[01:50:01.520 --> 01:50:06.640]  judge insisted on having a gentleman to have another continuous. The officer, because they
[01:50:06.640 --> 01:50:13.240]  had a special gun training he had to be at, but the lawyer never sent me anything to...
[01:50:13.240 --> 01:50:18.040]  They called it something. I never received that. Neither did the court receive it. So...
[01:50:18.040 --> 01:50:19.040]  A continuous.
[01:50:19.040 --> 01:50:26.040]  So I went to... Yes, this was the third time I already went where the officer never showed
[01:50:26.040 --> 01:50:28.040]  up. So the judge twisted it and made it sound like, oh, when I asked for a continuous, because
[01:50:28.040 --> 01:50:32.040]  I went there sick, that because of that, he was going to give the officer another chance.
[01:50:32.040 --> 01:50:37.040]  And so I made an emotional dismissal as well as to suppress the officer's statements. And
[01:50:37.040 --> 01:50:42.040]  due to the fact that the witness that they were going to use was supposed to be the gentleman
[01:50:42.040 --> 01:50:47.040]  I hit, would never show up and he wasn't going to show up. So I couldn't make it on the court
[01:50:47.040 --> 01:50:51.040]  day, which was on the 23rd of May, and I was out of town with my brother-in-law who was
[01:50:51.040 --> 01:50:59.040]  sick. So I got to think that my life would be suspended unless I respond to two types
[01:50:59.040 --> 01:51:05.040]  of reasoning why it shouldn't be. And the bottom one I can meet, but I don't have evidence
[01:51:05.040 --> 01:51:10.040]  to that. And so I was wondering how much time do I have to respond? Well...
[01:51:10.040 --> 01:51:13.040]  Well, what amount of time did that notice give you?
[01:51:13.040 --> 01:51:21.040]  It gave me 15 days from the time they sent it. And it used to be that you have to get
[01:51:21.040 --> 01:51:25.040]  it, but they don't care. They got something to show that they sent it. I don't have much
[01:51:25.040 --> 01:51:29.040]  time to get it, whether you get it or not, send it back. So I was supposed to do it today
[01:51:29.040 --> 01:51:34.040]  because the day is the 29th. I'm going to do it tomorrow in hopes of that. And so when
[01:51:34.040 --> 01:51:38.040]  I respond to that, then I have a right to go back and...
[01:51:38.040 --> 01:51:44.040]  Okay. Well, you need to get the case dismissed for failure to prosecute. Okay? That's what
[01:51:44.040 --> 01:51:50.040]  you need to do. File a motion to dismiss, failure to prosecute. No evidence, no witness,
[01:51:50.040 --> 01:51:53.040]  no case. Okay?
[01:51:53.040 --> 01:51:54.040]  Okay. Okay.
[01:51:54.040 --> 01:51:55.040]  All right.
[01:51:55.040 --> 01:51:56.040]  I got that.
[01:51:56.040 --> 01:52:03.040]  And at the same time, you need to move the court in that motion to notify whatever agency
[01:52:03.040 --> 01:52:09.040]  sent you that notice that they are not to suspend and or if they have suspended to fully
[01:52:09.040 --> 01:52:13.040]  reinstate your license at no cost to you.
[01:52:13.040 --> 01:52:19.040]  Not to suspend. Okay. All right. Suspend. I got that.
[01:52:19.040 --> 01:52:24.040]  All right. So that was one, two, three pocket tickets. And one last thing, because I don't
[01:52:24.040 --> 01:52:27.040]  want you to get back to that gentleman too. I'm always trying to be courteous as well,
[01:52:27.040 --> 01:52:31.040]  but I had like five questions. When I get these pocket tickets, I heard someone say
[01:52:31.040 --> 01:52:36.040]  that I can write my signature at an angle. And I don't know if that's the proper way
[01:52:36.040 --> 01:52:38.040]  to do it. And am I supposed to put...
[01:52:38.040 --> 01:52:43.040]  Yeah. And if you wear a rubber underwear, three sizes too small, you can be the new
[01:52:43.040 --> 01:52:44.040]  Bee Gees.
[01:52:44.040 --> 01:52:52.040]  Okay. So what am I supposed to do? I get two tickets. Because I was told this years ago
[01:52:52.040 --> 01:52:53.040]  and I didn't...
[01:52:53.040 --> 01:52:57.040]  No. That's patronut moronism is what that is.
[01:52:57.040 --> 01:53:04.040]  Okay. Okay. Thank you. So is there any way to protest that those tickets...
[01:53:04.040 --> 01:53:09.040]  Well, I don't know. What is the specific scheme they're using to write parking tickets?
[01:53:09.040 --> 01:53:16.040]  Is it state law? Is it municipal ordinance? What authorizes them to write a parking ticket?
[01:53:16.040 --> 01:53:21.040]  What does the ordinance say that they... Who is governed by the ordinance? And so on
[01:53:21.040 --> 01:53:28.040]  and so forth. Go read my blog site on what ordinances are and what they aren't.
[01:53:28.040 --> 01:53:31.040]  Okay. What ordinances are and aren't.
[01:53:31.040 --> 01:53:32.040]  Okay.
[01:53:32.040 --> 01:53:34.040]  Okay. All right. I got you.
[01:53:34.040 --> 01:53:40.040]  All right. So go to the blog site, tauoflaw.wordpress.com.
[01:53:40.040 --> 01:53:41.040]  Tauer.
[01:53:41.040 --> 01:53:46.040]  Tau of law. T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W.
[01:53:46.040 --> 01:53:48.040]  O-F-A.
[01:53:48.040 --> 01:53:51.040]  T-A-O.
[01:53:51.040 --> 01:53:52.040]  O-F.
[01:53:52.040 --> 01:53:53.040]  Uh-huh.
[01:53:53.040 --> 01:53:58.040]  L-A-W dot wordpress dot com.
[01:53:58.040 --> 01:54:04.040]  Dot wordpress dot R.
[01:54:04.040 --> 01:54:05.040]  Dot com.
[01:54:05.040 --> 01:54:10.040]  Okay. Dot com. I'm sorry, dot com. And that was the other reason I called because I know
[01:54:10.040 --> 01:54:15.040]  I needed to go to that and she's gone. Okay. So I'll try to get that email to you again
[01:54:15.040 --> 01:54:17.040]  because I know you would have sent it by then. Can I go to...
[01:54:17.040 --> 01:54:20.040]  Yeah. If I had gotten it, I would have replied to it, but I don't have it.
[01:54:20.040 --> 01:54:24.040]  I know you would have. You know, since you sent it, I've never gotten any replies yet.
[01:54:24.040 --> 01:54:28.040]  And now you will know why. For whatever reason, they're not getting here.
[01:54:28.040 --> 01:54:32.040]  Okay. Well, I need to let you get back to the guide. I appreciate that.
[01:54:32.040 --> 01:54:35.040]  I'll follow up on it and get everything to you that you need.
[01:54:35.040 --> 01:54:37.040]  All right, Charles. Thank you.
[01:54:37.040 --> 01:54:39.040]  Thank you. All right. Bye-bye.
[01:54:39.040 --> 01:54:42.040]  Bye-bye. All right. Now, back to Steve in Florida. All right, Steve.
[01:54:42.040 --> 01:54:44.040]  Sorry for the interruption. Please continue.
[01:54:44.040 --> 01:54:51.040]  That's all right, Eddie. I'm wondering, is my attorney guilty of malfeasance
[01:54:51.040 --> 01:54:55.040]  or malpractice for not providing us with what we asked for in a timely manner?
[01:54:55.040 --> 01:54:58.040]  Three weeks ago, we asked for the notes that he took.
[01:54:58.040 --> 01:55:04.040]  If you can show that the actions of your attorney harm your case or harm your ability
[01:55:04.040 --> 01:55:08.040]  to fight that case, then most certainly you can go after him for that.
[01:55:08.040 --> 01:55:12.040]  If you can show that they advise you incorrectly, if you can show that they
[01:55:12.040 --> 01:55:17.040]  don't have an understanding of proper law and procedure in these cases,
[01:55:17.040 --> 01:55:22.040]  and they use that to harm you in some way or give you bad advice
[01:55:22.040 --> 01:55:27.040]  or cause you to lose and do nothing to really benefit you,
[01:55:27.040 --> 01:55:29.040]  then most certainly you can sue him.
[01:55:29.040 --> 01:55:35.040]  You can sue a defense attorney for parting his hair wrong. Okay?
[01:55:35.040 --> 01:55:36.040]  Okay.
[01:55:36.040 --> 01:55:38.040]  But if you actually want to get something out of him,
[01:55:38.040 --> 01:55:43.040]  then you've got to prove that he was required to part it differently than he did.
[01:55:43.040 --> 01:55:48.040]  I understand. And writing letters to them might also help document it.
[01:55:48.040 --> 01:55:52.040]  Not unless you're getting answers back that you can use against them later.
[01:55:52.040 --> 01:55:56.040]  You can document it without telling him that you're doing that, right?
[01:55:56.040 --> 01:55:58.040]  Yes, sir.
[01:55:58.040 --> 01:56:02.040]  All right. So what good is it going to do to write him a letter
[01:56:02.040 --> 01:56:07.040]  when you should be actually recording any conversation you have with him?
[01:56:07.040 --> 01:56:11.040]  Yes, sir. And during our conversation, the one that we did have,
[01:56:11.040 --> 01:56:16.040]  they said a lot of things that didn't sound helpful or what we wanted them to do,
[01:56:16.040 --> 01:56:20.040]  and then they said a few things that did talk about reasonable suspicion
[01:56:20.040 --> 01:56:24.040]  and the probable cause, but that was just half and half.
[01:56:24.040 --> 01:56:28.040]  So if I get a judicial order regarding the two charges that were dropped,
[01:56:28.040 --> 01:56:31.040]  Eddie, the domestic violence and the failure to show ID,
[01:56:31.040 --> 01:56:35.040]  then how do I focus on getting the assaults dropped?
[01:56:35.040 --> 01:56:39.040]  It's a different matter then, because the reason for the stop,
[01:56:39.040 --> 01:56:43.040]  according to the 9-11, sounded like white male chasing female,
[01:56:43.040 --> 01:56:47.040]  ran her, but then we're dropping all those.
[01:56:47.040 --> 01:56:52.040]  Okay. Let me explain why that's not going to be an argument.
[01:56:52.040 --> 01:56:53.040]  Okay.
[01:56:53.040 --> 01:56:57.040]  Even if it turns out during the officer's investigation of the call
[01:56:57.040 --> 01:57:01.040]  that there was no domestic abuse, but in the course of that investigation,
[01:57:01.040 --> 01:57:03.040]  you physically assaulted that officer.
[01:57:03.040 --> 01:57:06.040]  Do you honestly expect that you would get away with the charge of assault
[01:57:06.040 --> 01:57:09.040]  because they couldn't charge you with domestic abuse?
[01:57:09.040 --> 01:57:11.040]  Maybe not.
[01:57:11.040 --> 01:57:14.040]  There ain't no maybe to it. Not. That's all there is.
[01:57:14.040 --> 01:57:15.040]  Okay.
[01:57:15.040 --> 01:57:17.040]  That's why that argument won't fly.
[01:57:17.040 --> 01:57:20.040]  It doesn't matter that they didn't charge you with a domestic abuse
[01:57:20.040 --> 01:57:25.040]  or that they even dropped it, even though that was the initial reason for the contact,
[01:57:25.040 --> 01:57:30.040]  because an officer can go to investigate an alleged crime
[01:57:30.040 --> 01:57:36.040]  and encounter evidence in plain view or through actions of another crime,
[01:57:36.040 --> 01:57:39.040]  and he's still perfectly legitimately capable of arresting
[01:57:39.040 --> 01:57:43.040]  and charging for that other crime without ever having to do the first one.
[01:57:43.040 --> 01:57:45.040]  Okay.
[01:57:45.040 --> 01:57:46.040]  Okay.
[01:57:46.040 --> 01:57:53.040]  It's interesting that in the dispatcher audio at 1 minute, 21 seconds in,
[01:57:53.040 --> 01:57:56.040]  there were two officers that came up to us at the same time,
[01:57:56.040 --> 01:57:58.040]  and that's documented in their timeline.
[01:57:58.040 --> 01:58:01.040]  One of the officers at 121 said,
[01:58:01.040 --> 01:58:04.040]  I'm calling the suspect to the restaurant bar.
[01:58:04.040 --> 01:58:09.040]  Less than nine seconds later, another officer was screaming at 131,
[01:58:09.040 --> 01:58:11.040]  Drop your gun!
[01:58:11.040 --> 01:58:14.040]  So that was when the arrest and the physical assault was happening on me.
[01:58:14.040 --> 01:58:16.040]  Nine seconds later.
[01:58:16.040 --> 01:58:21.040]  Okay. Well, you can bring that up as a point and see what your attorneys think about it.
[01:58:21.040 --> 01:58:22.040]  Okay.
[01:58:22.040 --> 01:58:25.040]  All right. All right, Steve, I got to go. I am out of time.
[01:58:25.040 --> 01:58:27.040]  Larry, I'm sorry I wasn't able to get to you.
[01:58:27.040 --> 01:58:33.040]  I apologize. Time is limited on this show, and again, I would do more if I could.
[01:58:33.040 --> 01:58:36.040]  All right, folks, thanks for listening. Thanks for calling.
[01:58:36.040 --> 01:58:38.040]  I greatly appreciate y'all, as does the network.
[01:58:38.040 --> 01:58:41.040]  Please keep us in your prayers and in your finances.
[01:58:41.040 --> 01:58:45.040]  When and if you can, we are in desperate need here, always.
[01:58:45.040 --> 01:58:50.040]  So y'all have a great week, good night, and God bless.
[01:58:50.040 --> 01:58:55.040]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible
[01:58:55.040 --> 01:58:58.040]  called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.040 --> 01:59:01.040]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes
[01:59:01.040 --> 01:59:04.040]  that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:04.040 --> 01:59:08.040]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.040 --> 01:59:11.040]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.040 --> 01:59:20.040]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.040 --> 01:59:26.040]  This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.040 --> 01:59:30.040]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.040 --> 01:59:33.040]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.040 --> 01:59:36.040]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:36.040 --> 01:59:41.040]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.040 --> 01:59:51.040]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.040 --> 01:59:54.040]  Looking for some truth? You found it.
[01:59:54.040 --> 02:00:11.040]  LogosRadioNetwork.com