ROL_2016-02-05_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily
[00:06.000 --> 00:08.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternatives.
[00:21.000 --> 00:28.000]  Markets for Wednesday the 3rd of February 2016 are currently treading with gold at $1,138.10 an ounce,
[00:28.000 --> 00:34.000]  silver at $14.63 an ounce, Texas crude at $29.88 an barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[00:34.000 --> 00:43.000]  sitting at about $370 U.S. currency.
[00:43.000 --> 00:49.000]  Today in history, the year 1966, the Luna 9 Russian spacecraft became the first unmanned
[00:49.000 --> 00:54.000]  probe to achieve a soft landing on the moon, or any other planetary body for that matter.
[00:54.000 --> 01:00.000]  Also known as the Y-E6 No. 13, it was the first probe to transmit photographic data
[01:00.000 --> 01:06.000]  to Earth from the lunar surface.
[01:06.000 --> 01:10.000]  In recent news, Sandra Merritt, one of the two indicted with tampering with governmental
[01:10.000 --> 01:14.000]  documents in order to create fake driver's license and a plot with anti-abortion activists
[01:14.000 --> 01:19.000]  to obtain the undercover video footage exposing Planned Parenthood for selling human body
[01:19.000 --> 01:22.000]  parts, turned herself in to Texas authorities today.
[01:22.000 --> 01:25.000]  She posted her $2,000 bond and was later released.
[01:25.000 --> 01:29.000]  However, the news conference she was scheduled to hold afterwards was canceled.
[01:29.000 --> 01:33.000]  David Daly-Eiden, the main activist behind the videos, plans to turn himself over to
[01:33.000 --> 01:35.000]  authorities tomorrow, his attorneys have stated.
[01:35.000 --> 01:40.000]  He does ironically face an additional misdemeanor charge related to the purchase of human tissue.
[01:40.000 --> 01:45.000]  Ironic because, if you recall, a grand jury in Houston, Texas that had been tasked with
[01:45.000 --> 01:50.000]  looking into the wrongdoing by Planned Parenthood announced that it was indicting Daly-Eiden
[01:50.000 --> 01:56.000]  and Merritt instead.
[01:56.000 --> 01:59.000]  The results for the Iowa caucus are as follows.
[01:59.000 --> 02:03.000]  For the Republican Party, Ted Cruz, 8 delegates or 27.7%.
[02:03.000 --> 02:07.000]  Donald Trump, 7 delegates or 24.3%.
[02:07.000 --> 02:10.000]  Mark Rubio, 7 delegates, 23.1%.
[02:10.000 --> 02:14.000]  Ben Carson, 3 delegates or 9.3%.
[02:14.000 --> 02:19.000]  Rand Paul, 1 delegate, 8,481 votes, 4.1%.
[02:19.000 --> 02:26.000]  Officially, Rand Paul did drop out this morning, stating the lack of funds and support as his main cause.
[02:26.000 --> 02:29.000]  Jeb Bush, 1 delegate at 2.8%.
[02:29.000 --> 02:32.000]  Carly Farina, 1 delegate at 1.9%.
[02:32.000 --> 02:36.000]  And John Kasich, 1 delegate at 1.9%.
[02:36.000 --> 02:42.000]  For the Democrats, it was actually decided by a coin toss which gave Hillary 6 wins out of 6 tosses.
[02:42.000 --> 02:50.000]  Hillary Clinton got 23 delegates and Bernie Sanders 21 delegates.
[02:50.000 --> 03:01.000]  This has been your Lowdown for February 3rd, 2016.
[03:01.000 --> 03:23.000]  Okay, we are back.
[03:23.000 --> 03:28.000]  We're in the Kelton group with our radio and we're talking to Mark in Texas.
[03:28.000 --> 03:42.000]  And yeah, tax is not my area, but they're claiming that they had this loss and because they had this loss, you had this gain.
[03:42.000 --> 03:55.000]  And I've heard people argue that before, but I didn't understand the issue because it's a matter of canceling losses.
[03:55.000 --> 04:09.000]  It would seem like you take the loss on losing the property and that loss would more than outweigh this, what the 1099 attributes to you.
[04:09.000 --> 04:12.000]  I do have a question about Arkansas.
[04:12.000 --> 04:21.000]  Do they have, what do you call it, deficiency judgments there?
[04:21.000 --> 04:25.000]  I'm not 100% sure of myself.
[04:25.000 --> 04:32.000]  I'm suspecting that since I have this, they're probably not going to come after me for that.
[04:32.000 --> 04:36.000]  It wouldn't have made any sense for them to do it.
[04:36.000 --> 04:46.000]  But what I was curious about is if this might actually be something that I could call actual damages on my STCPA complaint.
[04:46.000 --> 04:54.000]  And that's a good point because my logic earlier was that you lost the property and it would cancel this.
[04:54.000 --> 04:59.000]  But no, you lost the property and that's all your loss.
[04:59.000 --> 05:06.000]  They shouldn't get to cancel part of your loss if their act wasn't proper.
[05:06.000 --> 05:18.000]  And one of the things about this is not, I'm mixing you up with Chris's case.
[05:18.000 --> 05:20.000]  This one was out of time.
[05:20.000 --> 05:25.000]  And how did the court get around out of time?
[05:25.000 --> 05:28.000]  You mean the statute of limitations, it being filed?
[05:28.000 --> 05:29.000]  Yes.
[05:29.000 --> 05:35.000]  In my case, you've made points that I was just shaking my head and going,
[05:35.000 --> 05:37.000]  oh yeah, I know what you're talking about.
[05:37.000 --> 05:42.000]  In my case, I brought up subject matter jurisdiction up front.
[05:42.000 --> 05:51.000]  I wrote down, hey, this should dictate a criminal complaint as my rights to due process were violated.
[05:51.000 --> 05:55.000]  The plaintiff never affirmably pled subject matter jurisdiction.
[05:55.000 --> 05:56.000]  So that's one thing.
[05:56.000 --> 06:01.000]  In my hearing, no one responded at all.
[06:01.000 --> 06:05.000]  The judge didn't ask the plaintiff to respond.
[06:05.000 --> 06:07.000]  I made my case.
[06:07.000 --> 06:12.000]  I basically read my document and I added a little bit of lib here and there.
[06:12.000 --> 06:14.000]  But nobody responded.
[06:14.000 --> 06:21.000]  The judge essentially overlooked the fact that I noted that this was filed past the statute of limitations.
[06:21.000 --> 06:23.000]  It's on the face of the document.
[06:23.000 --> 06:31.000]  And that, you know, later on the plaintiff's attorneys had actually committed aggravated perjury stating...
[06:31.000 --> 06:32.000]  Wait a minute.
[06:32.000 --> 06:40.000]  Did the judge not rule on your subject matter jurisdiction issues point by point?
[06:40.000 --> 06:43.000]  The judge never ruled on it at all.
[06:43.000 --> 06:49.000]  The judge just said, he basically looked at the plaintiff's attorney and says,
[06:49.000 --> 06:56.000]  to my knowledge, I have subject matter jurisdiction over this.
[06:56.000 --> 06:57.000]  What do you say?
[06:57.000 --> 07:02.000]  And she says, why does the court has subject matter jurisdiction over foreclosures, Your Honor?
[07:02.000 --> 07:04.000]  That was all they did.
[07:04.000 --> 07:06.000]  That was it.
[07:06.000 --> 07:09.000]  You should sue the judge.
[07:09.000 --> 07:10.000]  Yeah, okay.
[07:10.000 --> 07:14.000]  That's the only time you can sue a judge.
[07:14.000 --> 07:22.000]  And the case law says that once subject matter jurisdiction is challenged, it's lost.
[07:22.000 --> 07:23.000]  And it may not be presumed.
[07:23.000 --> 07:26.000]  It must be proven.
[07:26.000 --> 07:41.000]  So you claim the lack of subject matter jurisdictions for issues outside of the jurisdictional boundaries.
[07:41.000 --> 07:51.000]  I said the face value of the complaint doesn't allow the plaintiff to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.
[07:51.000 --> 07:53.000]  I cited two laws there at once.
[07:53.000 --> 07:59.000]  So it sounds like they don't understand subject matter jurisdiction.
[07:59.000 --> 08:03.000]  They're thinking capacity, legal capacity.
[08:03.000 --> 08:04.000]  I'm sorry.
[08:04.000 --> 08:05.000]  They're thinking...
[08:05.000 --> 08:06.000]  Yeah.
[08:06.000 --> 08:11.000]  That they have subject matter jurisdiction over all matters of this kind.
[08:11.000 --> 08:17.000]  They're not thinking capacity of the plaintiff to invoke it.
[08:17.000 --> 08:18.000]  Right.
[08:18.000 --> 08:20.000]  You ought to sue the judge.
[08:20.000 --> 08:22.000]  I didn't object.
[08:22.000 --> 08:27.000]  I heard you telling your story about helping the 80-year-old lady earlier.
[08:27.000 --> 08:34.000]  And if I had just known to do that, then I would have forced this judge to put something on the record and make statements.
[08:34.000 --> 08:40.000]  But without a doubt, I can't imagine there could be anything other than just what you said.
[08:40.000 --> 08:44.000]  He denied my right to due process in that situation.
[08:44.000 --> 08:51.000]  And then if you think about what happens to many people who end up in a civil suit like this, maybe they have an attorney, maybe they don't.
[08:51.000 --> 08:53.000]  I couldn't find an attorney.
[08:53.000 --> 08:54.000]  I could have afforded one.
[08:54.000 --> 08:57.000]  But I couldn't afford an appeals attorney.
[08:57.000 --> 08:58.000]  And there I was.
[08:58.000 --> 09:07.000]  And essentially, you know, I was just completely denied justice as far as that was concerned unless I could figure out how to do it myself within 30 days.
[09:07.000 --> 09:18.000]  And I didn't worry so much about that because an attorney here and a very wise man that has a good radio show kind of bolstered that a little bit.
[09:18.000 --> 09:27.000]  But the attorney here in Austin that fights this stuff and wins quite a bit, he had told me, he said if the court didn't have subject matter jurisdiction,
[09:27.000 --> 09:30.000]  the appeals court doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction either.
[09:30.000 --> 09:32.000]  You need a writ of mandamus.
[09:32.000 --> 09:35.000]  And so I get started looking into that.
[09:35.000 --> 09:41.000]  I found that there had been a writ of mandamus against this judge in the past for something similar.
[09:41.000 --> 09:43.000]  So it makes it interesting.
[09:43.000 --> 09:48.000]  You might look at suing this judge personally.
[09:48.000 --> 09:49.000]  Yeah.
[09:49.000 --> 09:54.000]  You mean like he has a civil liability for what's happened or?
[09:54.000 --> 10:01.000]  The only time you can sue a judge is when he acts without subject matter jurisdiction.
[10:01.000 --> 10:03.000]  Sue him in the federal court.
[10:03.000 --> 10:06.000]  Sue him in your venue.
[10:06.000 --> 10:07.000]  I'm sorry.
[10:07.000 --> 10:09.000]  You said federal court and where?
[10:09.000 --> 10:13.000]  In your venue where you live.
[10:13.000 --> 10:16.000]  I can sue him here in Texas.
[10:16.000 --> 10:18.000]  Yep.
[10:18.000 --> 10:22.000]  He deprived you of your due process rights.
[10:22.000 --> 10:25.000]  By impersonating a judicial officer.
[10:25.000 --> 10:28.000]  And you live in Texas.
[10:28.000 --> 10:31.000]  And I can have the laws here work for me.
[10:31.000 --> 10:43.000]  I'll tell you, that sounds beautiful to me because it has been crazy ridiculous trying to find an FDCPA firm.
[10:43.000 --> 10:45.000]  FDCPA is federal.
[10:45.000 --> 10:47.000]  I would figure anybody could do it.
[10:47.000 --> 10:49.000]  There are people advertising that they do it.
[10:49.000 --> 10:52.000]  You get your attorney's fees paid.
[10:52.000 --> 10:54.000]  Why wouldn't somebody want to do that?
[10:54.000 --> 10:59.000]  And they tell me, maybe it is I'm not describing things appropriately.
[10:59.000 --> 11:05.000]  Maybe there's something that's tied to the fact that there's a judgment relative to the property in Arkansas.
[11:05.000 --> 11:12.000]  But what I've essentially said when I've talked to a few attorneys who aren't necessarily that interested.
[11:12.000 --> 11:16.000]  I said I don't want to sue the plaintiffs in this case.
[11:16.000 --> 11:23.000]  What I want to do is take letters that are violations of FDCPA within the one year statute of limitations.
[11:23.000 --> 11:28.000]  And I want to go after the servicer in this case.
[11:28.000 --> 11:32.000]  The organization that really created this fraudulent document in the first place.
[11:32.000 --> 11:39.000]  I want discovery from that lawsuit that's going to allow me to uncover the fraud.
[11:39.000 --> 11:45.000]  Even though we're just looking for false and misleading and actual damages in excess of $250,000.
[11:45.000 --> 11:47.000]  So there I am.
[11:47.000 --> 11:50.000]  It doesn't seem like any of them are really interested.
[11:50.000 --> 11:52.000]  I'm probably going to have to do this myself.
[11:52.000 --> 11:54.000]  Probably.
[11:54.000 --> 11:56.000]  Yeah.
[11:56.000 --> 11:58.000]  Now you get that.
[11:58.000 --> 12:00.000]  Why would they not be interested?
[12:00.000 --> 12:01.000]  Do you have any idea?
[12:01.000 --> 12:04.000]  I mean, if they're in the state that they can't do it?
[12:04.000 --> 12:09.000]  No lawyer is going to want to sue a judge.
[12:09.000 --> 12:14.000]  I'm not asking them to sue a judge as far as that aspect of it.
[12:14.000 --> 12:16.000]  Oh, you're talking about suing FDCPA.
[12:16.000 --> 12:21.000]  I don't know because generally there are lawyers that specialize in that.
[12:21.000 --> 12:23.000]  Well, you would think.
[12:23.000 --> 12:29.000]  There's Wimberg Law that has a YouTube video about suing SPS.
[12:29.000 --> 12:30.000]  I contacted them.
[12:30.000 --> 12:32.000]  They're not interested.
[12:32.000 --> 12:40.000]  I think many of them because they're looking at getting $1,000 for their client and they're not, you know, high dollar.
[12:40.000 --> 12:43.000]  I mean, they could get actual damages and it could be significant.
[12:43.000 --> 12:49.000]  I think many of them are just looking for short, sweet, easy things that they're comfortable with.
[12:49.000 --> 12:57.000]  And maybe even though they've read the FDCPA, which is 10 pages of Times New Roman 12 point font, they still maybe don't get it.
[12:57.000 --> 13:01.000]  I don't know.
[13:01.000 --> 13:08.000]  Well, I come across a lot of lawyers that strictly do not get it.
[13:08.000 --> 13:10.000]  I certainly have.
[13:10.000 --> 13:21.000]  But with all the garbage and trash you've been through, you might find it actually fun and interesting to sue the judge.
[13:21.000 --> 13:26.000]  It's a whole other animal when you switch feet.
[13:26.000 --> 13:29.000]  I just don't want to screw it up is really the thing.
[13:29.000 --> 13:31.000]  But suing the judge makes sense.
[13:31.000 --> 13:38.000]  I have to sue the attorneys and I'm within the statute of limitations on that, but I have to sue the attorneys for aggravated perjury.
[13:38.000 --> 13:51.000]  And if nothing more, that will take people who are acting for criminals in their own capacity as criminals, as far as I'm concerned, and do something to hold them accountable.
[13:51.000 --> 13:55.000]  And I'm sure they've done it to people whom they've hurt a lot more than they ever hurt me.
[13:55.000 --> 14:00.000]  They've frustrated me and angered me and made me have to calm my wife down a little bit.
[14:00.000 --> 14:09.000]  But these people have thrown people out in the street who didn't deserve it and hurt children and ruined marriages and things of that sort.
[14:09.000 --> 14:12.000]  I'd like to really stick them.
[14:12.000 --> 14:15.000]  Have you barged and grieved them a few times?
[14:15.000 --> 14:17.000]  I have not done that yet either.
[14:17.000 --> 14:18.000]  It's on the list.
[14:18.000 --> 14:19.000]  I've got it all down.
[14:19.000 --> 14:23.000]  I swear I've taken a break from the last few months.
[14:23.000 --> 14:28.000]  This has hurt my life in a few other ways in terms of things and it's been a nice break.
[14:28.000 --> 14:37.000]  But more or less, I'm thinking I still have some capacity to get back in.
[14:37.000 --> 14:39.000]  I'm going to do the FDCPA.
[14:39.000 --> 14:49.000]  I'm within time and I can use Jeff Sedgwick's resource, the guy you have on every once in a while, maybe some others.
[14:49.000 --> 15:01.000]  But I do that and they seem sharp, but if I do that type of thing, then I'm still worried about being pro se as I do it.
[15:01.000 --> 15:12.000]  I don't think if I don't have actual physical possession of the property, I don't have capacity to do a quiet title is my understanding.
[15:12.000 --> 15:18.000]  If I do have capacity to do that, that would make sense also because the assignment is broad on its face.
[15:18.000 --> 15:24.000]  I don't know that physical possession of the property is relevant to quiet title.
[15:24.000 --> 15:28.000]  If it's not, I could be wrong.
[15:28.000 --> 15:37.000]  I think I read that in a book and lo and behold, there's lots of different opinions.
[15:37.000 --> 15:40.000]  No, it's not possession.
[15:40.000 --> 15:42.000]  It's a claim.
[15:42.000 --> 15:45.000]  You have a claim against the property.
[15:45.000 --> 15:51.000]  If I come and drag you out of your house and throw you out in the street,
[15:51.000 --> 15:59.000]  that doesn't mean you still don't have a claim against your property just because you're not in the house anymore.
[15:59.000 --> 16:02.000]  You make all the sense in the world to me.
[16:02.000 --> 16:06.000]  I will start reading on that and then try to find someone there.
[16:06.000 --> 16:13.000]  Generally, the attorneys I've talked to about quiet title or tried to talk to, at least in that state,
[16:13.000 --> 16:15.000]  I haven't tried in Texas.
[16:15.000 --> 16:19.000]  I want to hope Texas is a little better.
[16:19.000 --> 16:27.000]  If you're going to sue for under FDPA, you can really do that local.
[16:27.000 --> 16:34.000]  But you might consider suing these lawyers for due process violations.
[16:34.000 --> 16:39.000]  See the judge and the lawyers both and bring them here.
[16:39.000 --> 16:45.000]  Then you might consider making a deal with them.
[16:45.000 --> 16:46.000]  Got it.
[16:46.000 --> 16:51.000]  Because let me explain what I expect will be some of the politics when we come back.
[16:51.000 --> 16:57.000]  This is Randy Kelton with our radio or call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:57.000 --> 17:02.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:02.000 --> 17:07.000]  They took our guns and get them back and support the Logos Radio Network at the same time.
[17:07.000 --> 17:12.000]  The following sponsors have stepped up to help keep this network on air with a fundraising contest.
[17:12.000 --> 17:17.000]  Thanks to Central Texas Gun Works with the first prize, the Spike Skull Lower Receiver.
[17:17.000 --> 17:20.000]  Second prize, the Taurus Curve Handgun.
[17:20.000 --> 17:23.000]  Every $25 donation gets a chance to win.
[17:23.000 --> 17:24.000]  Enter as often as you like.
[17:24.000 --> 17:26.000]  Check out centraltexasgunworks.com.
[17:26.000 --> 17:29.000]  Thanks also to mymagicmud.com.
[17:29.000 --> 17:35.000]  The first 40 people to donate $25 get a jar of My Magic Mud valued at $25.
[17:35.000 --> 17:39.000]  Thanks also to All About Vapor at 4631 Airport Boulevard.
[17:39.000 --> 17:43.000]  The 10 third place winners will get a $25 gift card.
[17:43.000 --> 17:46.000]  Stop smelling like a putt at allaboutvapor.com.
[17:46.000 --> 17:52.000]  Also, thanks to Eddie Craig, folks who buy the rule of law traffic seminar, get 10 entries into the contest.
[17:52.000 --> 17:57.000]  Check out the contest rules and details at logosradionetwork.com.
[17:57.000 --> 18:01.000]  Terror status or hipsters may not actually know who will win.
[18:01.000 --> 18:07.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[18:07.000 --> 18:12.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[18:12.000 --> 18:18.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[18:18.000 --> 18:23.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[18:23.000 --> 18:26.000]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[18:26.000 --> 18:32.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[18:32.000 --> 18:40.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[18:40.000 --> 18:48.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[18:48.000 --> 18:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[18:52.000 --> 18:59.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[18:59.000 --> 19:02.000]  Order now.
[19:02.000 --> 19:12.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[19:12.000 --> 19:24.000]  Well, don't let nothing get to you. Only the Father can deliver you. Don't let bad-minded people hurt you. Until states can get behind you.
[19:24.000 --> 19:28.000]  Know what I mean, my friend?
[19:28.000 --> 19:36.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Logos Radio. We're talking Mark in Georgia. Mark in Georgia. Mark in Texas.
[19:36.000 --> 19:44.000]  And politics. Okay, judges protect judges.
[19:44.000 --> 19:46.000]  Sure.
[19:46.000 --> 19:57.000]  Federal judges really protect federal judges, but they don't protect state judges as much as they protect federal judges.
[19:57.000 --> 19:59.000]  That sounds good.
[19:59.000 --> 20:04.000]  And lawyers are terrified of judges.
[20:04.000 --> 20:11.000]  So, let's look at the politics of this. You're the lawyer over there that got the judge to do this for you.
[20:11.000 --> 20:15.000]  Because you're buddies, you play golf with him, and you lose to him regularly.
[20:15.000 --> 20:20.000]  I had one lawyer in Florida tell me all you had to do is lose 500 bucks to the judge.
[20:20.000 --> 20:25.000]  In a golf, golf on Sunday, you win your case on Monday.
[20:25.000 --> 20:35.000]  So, you got the judge here, who just being a good judge, minding his own business,
[20:35.000 --> 20:41.000]  and he gets this challenge subject matter jurisdiction because this lawyer filed fraudulent documents,
[20:41.000 --> 20:50.000]  but the judge trusted him because he lost 500 bucks. He won 500 bucks from him Sunday on the golf course.
[20:50.000 --> 20:56.000]  And then the judge gets sued. Who do you think they're going to throw under the bus?
[20:56.000 --> 21:05.000]  The judge or this dirty rotten scoundrel lawyer who lied to the judge?
[21:05.000 --> 21:14.000]  Now, that may not be how it actually happens, but I can almost guarantee you the lawyer is going to believe that.
[21:14.000 --> 21:17.000]  Lawyers are terrified of judges.
[21:17.000 --> 21:23.000]  It took me a while to understand that. They are terrified of judges.
[21:23.000 --> 21:29.000]  Judges can end their career just on a whim, and they know it.
[21:29.000 --> 21:36.000]  They can sanction them for any amount they want to, anytime they want to.
[21:36.000 --> 21:42.000]  So, lawyers are absolutely beholden to judges.
[21:42.000 --> 21:52.000]  So, if you sue the judge and craft your case in a way that indicates that you sued the judge
[21:52.000 --> 22:04.000]  because he followed what this lying lawyer told him, well, judges really, really don't like to be sued.
[22:04.000 --> 22:10.000]  They almost never get sued because lawyers will never sue them.
[22:10.000 --> 22:19.000]  That's why they hate procès because every once in a while they come across the procès from hell, the one who will sue them.
[22:19.000 --> 22:25.000]  Good chance you file against both of them.
[22:25.000 --> 22:35.000]  Good chance if you make an approach to the lawyer, the lawyer will try to make you a deal to get you to go away.
[22:35.000 --> 22:44.000]  I doubt that it will hurt the lawyer much more having their insurance company pay off your settlement claim
[22:44.000 --> 22:50.000]  than it already hurt them getting the malpractice suit.
[22:50.000 --> 22:56.000]  Malpractice suit is going to sting them big time. I don't think paying off a claim is going to make it any worse.
[22:56.000 --> 23:06.000]  So, good chance you could, and even then, even then you might get the insurance company to come to you and pay it off.
[23:06.000 --> 23:17.000]  Yeah. As I've gone to attorneys who supposedly do that, they say, well, you can't sue an opposing attorney for malpractice.
[23:17.000 --> 23:20.000]  Yes, you can.
[23:20.000 --> 23:25.000]  Yeah, yeah. That's not exactly true. I knew you were going to say that.
[23:25.000 --> 23:34.000]  They don't want you suing that attorney because they don't want this other guy suing them.
[23:34.000 --> 23:43.000]  When you start talking about suing attorneys, all attorneys get real nervous except for malpractice attorney.
[23:43.000 --> 23:49.000]  But when you start suing judges, man, that's a whole other animal.
[23:49.000 --> 23:58.000]  I can't imagine any lawyer in his right professional mind suing a judge.
[23:58.000 --> 24:00.000]  Can you bar-grieve a judge?
[24:00.000 --> 24:02.000]  Do what?
[24:02.000 --> 24:10.000]  Or the judges have immunity for what they do from the bench and they don't suffer bar grievances or can they?
[24:10.000 --> 24:15.000]  Oh, no, not bar grievances. They generally don't carry their bar card anymore once they become a judge.
[24:15.000 --> 24:23.000]  But they do suffer judicial conduct complaints and they have a bond rating.
[24:23.000 --> 24:39.000]  A judicial conduct complaint, even if the judicial conduct, the commission on judicial conduct tosses your complaint, it still affects the bond rating.
[24:39.000 --> 24:42.000]  It's all about the money in the end.
[24:42.000 --> 24:51.000]  And while they can throw out the complaint, they can't keep from notifying the insurance company of it.
[24:51.000 --> 24:52.000]  It hurts them anyway.
[24:52.000 --> 24:56.000]  It's like you getting a ticket.
[24:56.000 --> 24:57.000]  You just can't get around it.
[24:57.000 --> 24:59.000]  So that'll hurt them.
[24:59.000 --> 25:04.000]  But suing them, that'll really jack up their bond rating.
[25:04.000 --> 25:12.000]  Now, they'll almost certainly get the case against a judge tossed, but you don't care.
[25:12.000 --> 25:16.000]  A judicial conduct complaint, they're going to feel it.
[25:16.000 --> 25:17.000]  They're going to know it.
[25:17.000 --> 25:20.000]  It's something considerable.
[25:20.000 --> 25:25.000]  And then could there also be a civil action, civil suit?
[25:25.000 --> 25:26.000]  Absolutely.
[25:26.000 --> 25:31.000]  The only judge acts outside of scope.
[25:31.000 --> 25:35.000]  There's no immunity for acting outside of scope.
[25:35.000 --> 25:43.000]  If he has no subject matter jurisdiction, he absolutely has no immunity of any kind.
[25:43.000 --> 25:50.000]  The subject matter jurisdiction had to have been affirmatively pled in a hearing when it was challenged.
[25:50.000 --> 26:04.000]  And reasonable to say, if on the face value of a complaint in any court in this country, if that complaint is being filed past the statute of limitations based on the pleadings of the plaintiffs,
[26:04.000 --> 26:11.000]  and that's exactly how it was, it's past statute of limitations, they need to establish that.
[26:11.000 --> 26:22.000]  And whether it's a bar to file in or an affirmative defense, it doesn't matter because you've made the affirmative defense.
[26:22.000 --> 26:26.000]  And so the judge can't claim jurisdiction.
[26:26.000 --> 26:27.000]  And they need to be sued.
[26:27.000 --> 26:29.000]  They need to find out.
[26:29.000 --> 26:35.000]  This should come back and bite you big time.
[26:35.000 --> 26:37.000]  Oh, that sounds great.
[26:37.000 --> 26:41.000]  If you will truly get justice, let me know.
[26:41.000 --> 26:44.000]  I'll help you put this together.
[26:44.000 --> 26:45.000]  Okay.
[26:45.000 --> 26:50.000]  And enjoy every minute of it.
[26:50.000 --> 26:56.000]  It goes to my ultimate outcome.
[26:56.000 --> 27:01.000]  I always know what I'm doing because I always know where I'm going.
[27:01.000 --> 27:19.000]  And I have an ultimate outcome, and it is my considered intent to place every judge in the country in a position such that when he steps up behind the bench and looks out across the bar at the gallery,
[27:19.000 --> 27:33.000]  I want him wondering which one, which one of those stinkers sitting out there in the gallery are waiting for me to render a ruling so he can run down to the grand jury and try to get me indicted.
[27:33.000 --> 27:36.000]  We get the judges in that position.
[27:36.000 --> 27:39.000]  We will have justice.
[27:39.000 --> 27:54.000]  In old England, they used to cover the judge's chair with the skin of the last criminal judge, corrupt judge they took off the bench.
[27:54.000 --> 28:01.000]  We can't do that, but this is the next best thing.
[28:01.000 --> 28:09.000]  Suing them. That's the only way you get them.
[28:09.000 --> 28:13.000]  So if you'll do that, I'll work with you.
[28:13.000 --> 28:18.000]  I need to work out how to write those up anyway and do the research for them.
[28:18.000 --> 28:37.000]  Well, I'm going to put all this together. It seems that it behooves me to try to look for an honest, malpractice attorney who actually doesn't tell me I can't sue the opposing attorneys for their aggravated perjury, and maybe I could work with that person.
[28:37.000 --> 28:42.000]  Just don't say one word about the judge then.
[28:42.000 --> 28:45.000]  Yeah, I won't talk about the judge because they're not going to do that.
[28:45.000 --> 28:48.000]  I know that.
[28:48.000 --> 28:58.000]  As I look into it, do you have any kind of previous complaints that have won?
[28:58.000 --> 29:01.000]  Where should I look for that?
[29:01.000 --> 29:04.000]  It'll be easy to find the case law.
[29:04.000 --> 29:07.000]  There's a lot of it out there.
[29:07.000 --> 29:09.000]  Okay.
[29:09.000 --> 29:17.000]  So that's not hard. Finding where someone's actually won against the judge, that's hard.
[29:17.000 --> 29:35.000]  But you don't find that because 99.9% of the time, the lawyer who sued with the judge is going to make a deal to get this thing shut down so that the judge doesn't get stuck with the suit.
[29:35.000 --> 29:45.000]  If the lawyer wants to keep practicing in front of judges, he will throw himself in front of the bus for the judge.
[29:45.000 --> 29:48.000]  Or they'll throw him under it.
[29:48.000 --> 29:50.000]  Hang on.
[29:50.000 --> 30:01.000]  Red DeKelton, Ruava Radio, I call it number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[30:01.000 --> 30:07.000]  Do not pass go. Go directly to jail. That's what lawbreakers normally hear from courts.
[30:07.000 --> 30:12.000]  But in Alabama, one judge is offering offenders a unique option for punishment.
[30:12.000 --> 30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and in a moment, I'll tell you what it is.
[30:16.000 --> 30:21.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.000 --> 30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:26.000 --> 30:32.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.000 --> 30:34.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[30:34.000 --> 30:41.000]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.000 --> 30:45.000]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:45.000 --> 30:49.000]  No country puts a bigger share of its citizens behind bars than the U.S.
[30:49.000 --> 30:56.000]  But in Baymanet, Alabama, one judge is offering a novel alternative to jail. Go to church on Sundays.
[30:56.000 --> 31:02.000]  This only applies to people convicted of misdemeanors, and offenders must check in weekly with their pastor and the police.
[31:02.000 --> 31:06.000]  Then after 52 sermons, their cases are dismissed.
[31:06.000 --> 31:14.000]  The ACLU says this violates the separation between church and state, and other critics say it's unfair to atheists and minority religions.
[31:14.000 --> 31:17.000]  But I see the program is at least worth trying.
[31:17.000 --> 31:22.000]  Being in church on Sunday rather than a prison cell just might change the lives of people on the wrong path.
[31:22.000 --> 31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albert for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.000 --> 31:37.000]  Did you know there are 3 million edible food plants on earth, and none have the nutritional value of the hemp plant?
[31:37.000 --> 31:45.000]  HempUSA.org offers you hemp protein powder. It does not contain chemicals or THC, is non-GMO, and is 100% gluten-free.
[31:45.000 --> 31:52.000]  Hemp protein powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein, and feeds the body the nutrients it needs.
[31:52.000 --> 32:01.000]  Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at HempUSA.org.
[32:01.000 --> 32:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:05.000 --> 32:10.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:18.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:18.000 --> 32:20.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:26.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.000 --> 32:34.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:41.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:46.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.000 --> 32:51.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:01.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:01.000 --> 33:11.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:31.000 --> 33:51.000]  I won't, I won't let you pull the wool over my eyes.
[33:51.000 --> 34:01.000]  We must refuse your news or so come in lies.
[34:01.000 --> 34:02.000]  Okay, we are back.
[34:02.000 --> 34:03.000]  Randy Kelton, rule of law radio.
[34:03.000 --> 34:04.000]  We're talking to Mark in Texas.
[34:04.000 --> 34:07.000]  So Mark, if you're game, I'm willing to help.
[34:07.000 --> 34:11.000]  I'd like nothing better than to help sue a judge.
[34:11.000 --> 34:12.000]  Oh, you'd better believe it.
[34:12.000 --> 34:13.000]  I would love to have your help.
[34:13.000 --> 34:18.000]  I'm really curious about one thing, and then I want to let you go, because there's other people I think waiting.
[34:18.000 --> 34:21.000]  I'm really curious about this.
[34:21.000 --> 34:38.000]  How is it that here in often Texas in this district or wherever in this, in this federal area, whatever it is, how is it that they would have jurisdiction over this matter versus attorneys in or the system in Arkansas?
[34:38.000 --> 34:39.000]  Okay.
[34:39.000 --> 34:42.000]  You are from Texas.
[34:42.000 --> 34:45.000]  They are in Arkansas.
[34:45.000 --> 34:46.000]  That's right.
[34:46.000 --> 34:51.000]  Anyone between you and Arkansas would have jurisdiction.
[34:51.000 --> 34:52.000]  Okay.
[34:52.000 --> 34:55.000]  So it can be here or there.
[34:55.000 --> 35:00.000]  Either one, either they're here or anywhere in between.
[35:00.000 --> 35:01.000]  Okay.
[35:01.000 --> 35:02.000]  Now, wait, wait a minute.
[35:02.000 --> 35:06.000]  Let me correct that that for the federal that may not exactly be true.
[35:06.000 --> 35:26.000]  I know if, if in Texas, if I'm from Wise County, when that stuff that happened in Cherokee County, I could have filed in any county in between, but I'm not sure if it's the same way in the federal, but certainly you can file.
[35:26.000 --> 35:32.000]  If you're filing a federal suit, you file in your venue.
[35:32.000 --> 35:33.000]  Yeah, okay.
[35:33.000 --> 35:36.000]  And they have to come to you.
[35:36.000 --> 35:38.000]  So they're going to have to hire a lawyer.
[35:38.000 --> 35:49.000]  The judge is going to have to hire a lawyer in Texas to answer his case.
[35:49.000 --> 35:53.000]  Well, it sounds like all kinds of trouble.
[35:53.000 --> 36:01.000]  When we, when we file this one, we don't get mad because they're going to want to throw out the suit against the judge.
[36:01.000 --> 36:13.000]  So we want to craft it in a way that it's really hard for them to throw it out because we want the judge to pressure the lawyer to make you a deal.
[36:13.000 --> 36:16.000]  All about the money.
[36:16.000 --> 36:19.000]  I get it in every, in every way.
[36:19.000 --> 36:20.000]  It's brilliant.
[36:20.000 --> 36:23.000]  I've got your email address.
[36:23.000 --> 36:25.000]  We'll be in touch.
[36:25.000 --> 36:26.000]  Okay.
[36:26.000 --> 36:28.000]  Thank you, Mark.
[36:28.000 --> 36:32.000]  Okay, now we're going to go to Charles in Georgia.
[36:32.000 --> 36:34.000]  Hello, Charles.
[36:34.000 --> 36:38.000]  I hear you are already going to the Fed.
[36:38.000 --> 36:39.000]  I am.
[36:39.000 --> 36:40.000]  I am already going to the Fed.
[36:40.000 --> 36:43.000]  I actually went to the Fed.
[36:43.000 --> 36:47.000]  I went to the court to retrieve the templates and everything on Wednesday.
[36:47.000 --> 36:59.000]  And I wanted to confer with you first before I turn this thing in because I'm just, I'm just hopping mad and everything else that goes along with that.
[36:59.000 --> 37:04.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, we got to fix that.
[37:04.000 --> 37:08.000]  You're not going to win hopping mad.
[37:08.000 --> 37:12.000]  How mean are you?
[37:12.000 --> 37:14.000]  I'm a junkyard dog.
[37:14.000 --> 37:15.000]  Try me.
[37:15.000 --> 37:17.000]  Okay.
[37:17.000 --> 37:24.000]  Mad causes you to react emotionally when they betray you.
[37:24.000 --> 37:36.000]  Mean says, take your best shot because when you're done, I'm still going to be there.
[37:36.000 --> 37:37.000]  That's right.
[37:37.000 --> 37:39.000]  So be careful about getting mad.
[37:39.000 --> 37:41.000]  It weakens us.
[37:41.000 --> 37:44.000]  And they love to use that against us.
[37:44.000 --> 37:50.000]  So traffic, going to the Fed, this is great.
[37:50.000 --> 37:54.000]  We have someone here going to the Fed with traffic.
[37:54.000 --> 37:59.000]  This is, and you know, traffic, that's all about money.
[37:59.000 --> 38:00.000]  Nothing else.
[38:00.000 --> 38:09.000]  The traffic, the municipal judges and the JPs, they're just there to produce dollar flow.
[38:09.000 --> 38:11.000]  So how much dollar flow are you going to cause them?
[38:11.000 --> 38:16.000]  Can you kind of give us an idea of synopsis of your case?
[38:16.000 --> 38:19.000]  I can, I can.
[38:19.000 --> 38:21.000]  I have a Michigan license.
[38:21.000 --> 38:25.000]  I'm here in Georgia.
[38:25.000 --> 38:27.000]  The officer pulled me over.
[38:27.000 --> 38:34.000]  I was at a left-hand, I was in the left-hand turn lane and I made my turn on the left-hand arrow.
[38:34.000 --> 38:40.000]  But I did notice the cops sitting behind my car at this stop sign, at this stop light.
[38:40.000 --> 38:46.000]  Once the green arrow turned, you know, I had my traffic signal, I had my turn signal on, made my left.
[38:46.000 --> 38:52.000]  And I got ready to pull and turn into the, turn into the fast food restaurant, the checkers or rallies,
[38:52.000 --> 38:55.000]  whatever you want to call it, that was right there on the corner.
[38:55.000 --> 38:57.000]  He flicked his lights on.
[38:57.000 --> 39:02.000]  So, you know, I pulled in and pulled into a spot and, you know, calmly waited.
[39:02.000 --> 39:08.000]  Now my windows on my car don't roll down, so I committed a cognitive sin by opening my door.
[39:08.000 --> 39:11.000]  I don't smoke and I don't drink, so he's not going to smell anything.
[39:11.000 --> 39:17.000]  But he could, you know, lie and say he smelled something and took it further.
[39:17.000 --> 39:19.000]  But I didn't worry about that because I don't.
[39:19.000 --> 39:28.000]  So I opened the door and the first thing that came out of his mouth was, how long you been here?
[39:28.000 --> 39:31.000]  You know, I don't answer questions like that normally.
[39:31.000 --> 39:33.000]  Normally I don't answer questions like that.
[39:33.000 --> 39:37.000]  But on this day, I figured I would, you know, I would see how far he wanted to go with this.
[39:37.000 --> 39:41.000]  I figured he was going to give me a ticket and I was going to be, you know, on my way.
[39:41.000 --> 39:45.000]  I said, listen, I don't understand the question.
[39:45.000 --> 39:52.000]  So he got, you know, he got agitated and asked me the question again.
[39:52.000 --> 39:54.000]  And I told him the same thing.
[39:54.000 --> 39:57.000]  I said, you know, I have to refrain that question because that's very vague.
[39:57.000 --> 39:59.000]  I don't understand what you mean.
[39:59.000 --> 40:01.000]  I mean, I'm here in my car.
[40:01.000 --> 40:06.000]  So this went on for about a minute and a half.
[40:06.000 --> 40:11.000]  I said, listen, man, I'm in and out of Georgia a lot.
[40:11.000 --> 40:14.000]  So he said, well, listen, I said, well, why did you pull me over?
[40:14.000 --> 40:18.000]  He said, well, you made an illegal left turn.
[40:18.000 --> 40:19.000]  Okay.
[40:19.000 --> 40:25.000]  Well, so he went back to the car.
[40:25.000 --> 40:28.000]  You know, he asked me for my license and he went back to the car.
[40:28.000 --> 40:33.000]  He said, listen, you have a Michigan license here and you don't have a Georgia license,
[40:33.000 --> 40:38.000]  so I'm going to have to take you in.
[40:38.000 --> 40:47.000]  So that's where we are with that.
[40:47.000 --> 40:48.000]  That's where we are.
[40:48.000 --> 40:59.000]  So, you know, I have a ticket for not having a license when I do have a valid Michigan license.
[40:59.000 --> 41:00.000]  Whoa.
[41:00.000 --> 41:02.000]  Wonderful.
[41:02.000 --> 41:06.000]  Did he give you a ticket for improper left-hand turn?
[41:06.000 --> 41:09.000]  Yes, he did.
[41:09.000 --> 41:10.000]  Yes, he did.
[41:10.000 --> 41:17.000]  He gave me a ticket for improper left turn and no license.
[41:17.000 --> 41:22.000]  And there's an actual statute here in Georgia that's called, you know, no license.
[41:22.000 --> 41:24.000]  That doesn't have anything to do with being suspended.
[41:24.000 --> 41:43.000]  The statute actually reads that a person not here, I mean, here for more than 30 days must get a Georgia driver's license.
[41:43.000 --> 41:50.000]  Well, you know, you have to be here 30 straight days within the geographical, I mean, I'm sorry,
[41:50.000 --> 41:55.000]  within the political lines of Georgia, 30 straight days.
[41:55.000 --> 41:58.000]  And then that's when this rule is invoked.
[41:58.000 --> 42:05.000]  So I want to know what spy they had here that was following me around for 29 straight days
[42:05.000 --> 42:12.000]  and did not know that I had left this state on the 30th day.
[42:12.000 --> 42:26.000]  That should get, yeah, that should get due process because does the statute, does the citation state the elements of the crime
[42:26.000 --> 42:39.000]  and state the facts that the officer has to believe that you met each one of the elements?
[42:39.000 --> 42:54.000]  Under 40, the citation that I received, 40-5-20 under the OCGA, the official code of Georgia annotated.
[42:54.000 --> 43:00.000]  There are no notes on the citation, none.
[43:00.000 --> 43:09.000]  So there's nothing on the citation addressing the elements of the offense?
[43:09.000 --> 43:12.000]  None. There's nothing.
[43:12.000 --> 43:25.000]  It says, I'm going to read you verbatim what is on this, it says offense, driving while unlicensed.
[43:25.000 --> 43:32.000]  The next line says in violation of Code 40-5-20 of state law.
[43:32.000 --> 43:35.000]  Under that, it says remarks.
[43:35.000 --> 43:39.000]  There is a big blank spot for remarks.
[43:39.000 --> 43:41.000]  Oh, good. Okay.
[43:41.000 --> 43:43.000]  About to go to break.
[43:43.000 --> 43:46.000]  I want to suggest a strategy when we come back.
[43:46.000 --> 43:48.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Real Wall Radio.
[43:48.000 --> 43:57.000]  I call in number 512-646-1984. While we're on break, go look at our sponsors and look at our gun giveaway.
[43:57.000 --> 44:02.000]  Help us support this network.
[44:02.000 --> 44:06.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com
[44:06.000 --> 44:12.000]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas
[44:12.000 --> 44:17.000]  on Brave New Books and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[44:17.000 --> 44:22.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[44:22.000 --> 44:26.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Eme oil,
[44:26.000 --> 44:30.000]  lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[44:30.000 --> 44:37.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[44:37.000 --> 44:43.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[44:43.000 --> 45:01.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.000 --> 45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.000 --> 45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[45:07.000 --> 45:15.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.000 --> 45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.000 --> 45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 46:04.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.000 --> 46:27.000]  Okay, we are back.
[46:27.000 --> 46:31.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Charles in Georgia.
[46:31.000 --> 46:40.000]  And the officer wrote the citation and the citation on its face is insufficient.
[46:40.000 --> 46:46.000]  I would suggest you make up a criminal accusation against the lawyer,
[46:46.000 --> 46:56.000]  the lawyer, against the officer for tampering with a government document that could be a departure.
[46:56.000 --> 47:03.000]  Fill them out, date them the date of the trial.
[47:03.000 --> 47:13.000]  You want to get this officer on the stand and ask him, did you see the Michigan license?
[47:13.000 --> 47:19.000]  And when he says, yes, he did, then you take out those two complaints.
[47:19.000 --> 47:27.000]  You take them and hand them to the judge and tell the judge that you want the judge to verify your affirmation
[47:27.000 --> 47:32.000]  and to take these complaints and act on them.
[47:32.000 --> 47:42.000]  Once he's made the statement, you don't want to give him any opportunity to recant.
[47:42.000 --> 47:55.000]  Once he admits that he's seen your license, then he's admitted that the citation was perjurious and fraudulent.
[47:55.000 --> 48:04.000]  You're going to have a tampering with a government document statement, every state has one, and aggravated perjury.
[48:04.000 --> 48:12.000]  He tampered with a government document when he put a false statement on a government document that he knew to be false
[48:12.000 --> 48:15.000]  and intended that it be taken as true.
[48:15.000 --> 48:22.000]  When he presented that document to the clerk, he did so under oath.
[48:22.000 --> 48:27.000]  So it's a separate offense, the aggravated perjury. Does that make sense?
[48:27.000 --> 48:34.000]  Okay. Okay, that does.
[48:34.000 --> 48:43.000]  If the prosecutor extracts this information, if he tells the prosecutor that you had a Michigan license,
[48:43.000 --> 48:54.000]  then you move to strike the witness because the witness is before the court with unclean hands.
[48:54.000 --> 48:58.000]  Then they take the complaint, it's up to the judge.
[48:58.000 --> 48:59.000]  That ought to be fun.
[48:59.000 --> 49:08.000]  And then when the judge refuses to act on the complaints, then you ask the judge to stand down from the bench.
[49:08.000 --> 49:15.000]  You almost certainly have a shielding from prosecution statute in Georgia.
[49:15.000 --> 49:23.000]  If you don't have shielding from prosecution, you will most certainly have obstruction of justice.
[49:23.000 --> 49:30.000]  If the judge refuses to act on the complaints, then he's failing to perform his duty as a magistrate.
[49:30.000 --> 49:34.000]  And in every state, every judge is also a magistrate.
[49:34.000 --> 49:43.000]  So he's refusing to perform his duty and in the process, he's shielding this person from prosecution.
[49:43.000 --> 49:48.000]  So it will either be shielding or obstruction of justice.
[49:48.000 --> 49:58.000]  And if he says one word to you that you can in any way take as a threat, witness tampering.
[49:58.000 --> 50:01.000]  That's failing in every state.
[50:01.000 --> 50:06.000]  This gets to be way too much fun.
[50:06.000 --> 50:13.000]  Then you take those complaints and you start walking up the line with them.
[50:13.000 --> 50:24.000]  If you're filing a federal suit, before you get to the federal suit, you want to have them set up.
[50:24.000 --> 50:37.000]  So when you go to the feds and tell the feds that this officer wrote out this ticket and he liked like a dog.
[50:37.000 --> 50:44.000]  And they're going to say, why would he do a thing like that when he knows he can get in trouble for it?
[50:44.000 --> 50:50.000]  And you're going to say, because he would do that because he knows he won't get in trouble for it.
[50:50.000 --> 50:54.000]  Everybody will protect him.
[50:54.000 --> 51:00.000]  And that goes to a nice RICO suit.
[51:00.000 --> 51:09.000]  They do this to you and you can show this as institutionalized behavior.
[51:09.000 --> 51:18.000]  This is an ongoing enterprise strictly for the purpose of collecting income.
[51:18.000 --> 51:21.000]  Does that sound like fun?
[51:21.000 --> 51:24.000]  It does. It sounds like a lot of fun.
[51:24.000 --> 51:33.000]  I'm thinking when you get to the federal court, they're going to be thinking, did you exercise all your remedies?
[51:33.000 --> 51:41.000]  And by going to the sheriff and asking the sheriff, you don't ask the sheriff to arrest the officer.
[51:41.000 --> 51:47.000]  Is the officer a municipal police officer or county sheriff?
[51:47.000 --> 51:48.000]  Municipal.
[51:48.000 --> 51:49.000]  Oh, perfect.
[51:49.000 --> 51:50.000]  I'm sorry.
[51:50.000 --> 51:51.000]  This is perfect.
[51:51.000 --> 52:01.000]  So you go to the municipal court, give them to the judge and he's going to refuse to take them.
[52:01.000 --> 52:07.000]  And if you're really ambitious, you take them to the mayor because he's also a magistrate.
[52:07.000 --> 52:11.000]  And when he says, oh, well, you need to take those somewhere else.
[52:11.000 --> 52:16.000]  What you take somewhere else are the complaints against the mayor.
[52:16.000 --> 52:21.000]  You take those to the next highest court, which are not a judge.
[52:21.000 --> 52:25.000]  Do you have justice as a piece in Georgia?
[52:25.000 --> 52:26.000]  Not to my knowledge.
[52:26.000 --> 52:29.000]  Okay, then good. Did you just go straight to the county court?
[52:29.000 --> 52:34.000]  Because that's going to be learned counsel.
[52:34.000 --> 52:36.000]  So he has to be a lawyer.
[52:36.000 --> 52:44.000]  And municipal judges, I don't know if they have to in Georgia, but they don't have to be in Texas unless it's a court of record.
[52:44.000 --> 52:51.000]  So you can have a municipal judge that's not a lawyer, but you can't have a county judge that's not a lawyer.
[52:51.000 --> 52:54.000]  So you know he's a lawyer. He's learning counsel.
[52:54.000 --> 52:59.000]  You take it to the county judge. He's going to refuse to take it.
[52:59.000 --> 53:07.000]  You take a set against the county judge to the district judge and get him to refuse to take it.
[53:07.000 --> 53:13.000]  And depending on how ambitious you are, you can take it to the attorney general.
[53:13.000 --> 53:25.000]  The attorney general in Georgia, does the attorney general in Georgia have original prosecutorial powers?
[53:25.000 --> 53:30.000]  Hold on. Let me explain why I'm asking that question that way.
[53:30.000 --> 53:39.000]  In Pennsylvania, the attorney general is the highest prosecutor.
[53:39.000 --> 53:42.000]  He's a prosecutor in his own right.
[53:42.000 --> 53:55.000]  In Texas, the only time the attorney general can prosecute is the only time he is the prosecutor in his own right.
[53:55.000 --> 54:03.000]  He's on a complaint against a prosecuting attorney, accusing the prosecutor of violating the Open Records Act.
[54:03.000 --> 54:06.000]  Otherwise, he has no prosecutorial power.
[54:06.000 --> 54:10.000]  He has investigatory but not prosecutorial.
[54:10.000 --> 54:15.000]  Unless the prosecutor invites him into a case.
[54:15.000 --> 54:23.000]  So do you know if the attorney general in Georgia can prosecute in his own right?
[54:23.000 --> 54:26.000]  You know, I don't know. I don't know.
[54:26.000 --> 54:35.000]  Find out if he can, then take it to the attorney general's office and they'll refuse to take it.
[54:35.000 --> 54:44.000]  And then take it to your court of appeals and get them to refuse to take it.
[54:44.000 --> 54:47.000]  You know, they'll all say, well, you really need to take this over here.
[54:47.000 --> 54:50.000]  And you say, oh, okay, thank you very much.
[54:50.000 --> 54:53.000]  And that's all you need. They sent you somewhere else.
[54:53.000 --> 54:58.000]  Then you charge them with not acting and go to the Supreme.
[54:58.000 --> 55:03.000]  I said a whole bunch of complaints to the chief justice of the Supreme.
[55:03.000 --> 55:06.000]  That was a hoot.
[55:06.000 --> 55:11.000]  Then I charged him with 32 counts when he didn't act on them.
[55:11.000 --> 55:14.000]  That was great fun.
[55:14.000 --> 55:21.000]  So once you've done all that, now you have documented the entire system,
[55:21.000 --> 55:28.000]  all the way up to the chief justice shielding this officer from prosecution.
[55:28.000 --> 55:37.000]  If along the way anybody gives you sage advice about all the bad things that can happen to you,
[55:37.000 --> 55:41.000]  nah, it's happening with a witness.
[55:41.000 --> 55:48.000]  Then when you get to the fence, now they've got a lot taller hill to climb.
[55:48.000 --> 55:57.000]  And the best thing about this is to demonstrate to them when you start stepping across these legal lines,
[55:57.000 --> 56:00.000]  every step makes it worse.
[56:00.000 --> 56:03.000]  It gets heavier and heavier.
[56:03.000 --> 56:11.000]  And if any of them have you thrown out of the courthouse by the bailiff,
[56:11.000 --> 56:15.000]  well, that bailiff's prominently displaying a deadly weapon.
[56:15.000 --> 56:18.000]  That's aggravated assault.
[56:18.000 --> 56:24.000]  I once accused the prosecuting attorney of aggravated assault.
[56:24.000 --> 56:34.000]  I was in Denton County, and I bushwhacked a district judge in his courtroom with criminal complaints
[56:34.000 --> 56:39.000]  against a district attorney, and he was not happy.
[56:39.000 --> 56:43.000]  Well, Mr. Kelton, I did my standard bushwhack routine.
[56:43.000 --> 56:48.000]  I walk in, walk up to the bar, point at the bailiff, if you, come here.
[56:48.000 --> 56:50.000]  They hate to be summoned. He comes over.
[56:50.000 --> 56:51.000]  Can I help you?
[56:51.000 --> 56:54.000]  My name is Randall Kelton, instructor judge, and I have business with the court.
[56:54.000 --> 56:56.000]  May I tell them to hatred the business?
[56:56.000 --> 56:57.000]  No, you may not.
[56:57.000 --> 56:59.000]  I have business with the court, and it's none of yours.
[56:59.000 --> 57:00.000]  You're dismissed.
[57:00.000 --> 57:01.000]  So now he is furious.
[57:01.000 --> 57:06.000]  He goes up to the judge and whispers in his ear, and the judge finishes the hearing.
[57:06.000 --> 57:11.000]  I'd like to do this when they have motion hearings, because there's lots of breaks.
[57:11.000 --> 57:14.000]  Mr. Kelton, I understand you have business with the court.
[57:14.000 --> 57:15.000]  Yes, Your Honor, I do.
[57:15.000 --> 57:17.000]  May I approach, and I hold up the folder?
[57:17.000 --> 57:19.000]  That means can I give this to you?
[57:19.000 --> 57:21.000]  He sends his bailiff to get it.
[57:21.000 --> 57:22.000]  He opens it up.
[57:22.000 --> 57:27.000]  He's looking at criminal complaints against the district clerk for failing to give criminal complaints
[57:27.000 --> 57:30.000]  against the district attorney to the grand jury, and the judge said,
[57:30.000 --> 57:34.000]  well, Mr. Kelton, normally I'd give these to the district attorney,
[57:34.000 --> 57:38.000]  but since he is accused, I don't think I can do that.
[57:38.000 --> 57:40.000]  I said, yes, Your Honor, if you gave that to the district attorney,
[57:40.000 --> 57:42.000]  I'd consider that a criminal act.
[57:42.000 --> 57:44.000]  Well, you would, Mr. Kelton.
[57:44.000 --> 57:45.000]  Yes, Your Honor, I would.
[57:45.000 --> 57:48.000]  So, Mr. Kelton, what did you suggest I do with him?
[57:48.000 --> 57:52.000]  I said, well, you're a high-level judge and a learned counsel.
[57:52.000 --> 57:56.000]  I figured you'd come up with something real interesting to do with him.
[57:56.000 --> 57:58.000]  Well, I'll just give him to the former grand jury.
[57:58.000 --> 57:59.000]  Thank you very much, Your Honor.
[57:59.000 --> 58:01.000]  And then they weren't verified.
[58:01.000 --> 58:05.000]  So I said, normally the clerk does that, but I don't have one here.
[58:05.000 --> 58:09.000]  So I had to go across the hall and get the district attorney's office to do it.
[58:09.000 --> 58:11.000]  Well, they were not happy.
[58:11.000 --> 58:17.000]  The head of their criminal section tried to throw me out of their office and all.
[58:17.000 --> 58:23.000]  Let me just pass off real quick on the other side, to show you where this goes.
[58:23.000 --> 58:28.000]  When they start using their authority to push you around,
[58:28.000 --> 58:34.000]  when you're the one down there filing complaints, it gets real heavy, real fast.
[58:34.000 --> 58:36.000]  Randy Kelton, we're on radio.
[58:36.000 --> 58:40.000]  I call at number 512-646-1984.
[58:40.000 --> 58:45.000]  This is the top of the hour break, so it's a good time to go to logosradionetwork.com
[58:45.000 --> 58:50.000]  and check out our sponsors and our good giveaway and help support us.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.000 --> 58:57.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible
[58:57.000 --> 59:01.000]  and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.000 --> 59:06.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:06.000 --> 59:09.000]  It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes
[59:09.000 --> 59:13.000]  that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.000 --> 59:21.000]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[59:21.000 --> 59:27.000]  clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church.
[59:27.000 --> 59:30.000]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version
[59:30.000 --> 59:33.000]  and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:33.000 --> 59:40.000]  call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.000 --> 59:45.000]  That's 888-551-0102.
[59:45.000 --> 59:50.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:50.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown,
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  providing you daily bulletins for the commodities market.
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:12.000]  Today in history, news updates,
[01:00:12.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternatives.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:24.000]  Markets for Wednesday, the 3rd of February, 2016,
[01:00:24.000 --> 01:00:28.000]  are currently treading with gold at $1,138.10 an ounce,
[01:00:28.000 --> 01:00:30.000]  silver at $14.63 an ounce,
[01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:33.000]  Texas crude at $29.88 a barrel,
[01:00:33.000 --> 01:00:43.000]  and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $370 U.S. currency.
[01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:46.000]  Today in history, the year 1966,
[01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:50.000]  the Luna 9 Russian spacecraft became the first unmanned probe
[01:00:50.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  to achieve a soft landing on the Moon,
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:54.000]  or any other planetary body for that matter.
[01:00:54.000 --> 01:00:57.000]  Also known as the YE6-13,
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:02.000]  it was the first probe to transmit photographic data to Earth from the lunar surface.
[01:01:02.000 --> 01:01:07.000]  In recent news, Sandra Merritt,
[01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:10.000]  one of the two indicted with tampering with governmental documents
[01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  in order to create fake driver's license
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:16.000]  and a plot with anti-abortion activists to obtain the undercover video footage
[01:01:16.000 --> 01:01:19.000]  exposing Planned Parenthood for selling human body parts,
[01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  turned herself in to Texas authorities today.
[01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  She posted her $2,000 bond and was later released.
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:29.000]  However, the news conference that she was scheduled to hold afterwards was canceled.
[01:01:29.000 --> 01:01:32.000]  David Daly-Iden, the main activist behind the videos,
[01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:34.000]  plans to turn himself over to authorities tomorrow,
[01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:36.000]  his attorneys have stated.
[01:01:36.000 --> 01:01:38.000]  He does ironically face an additional misdemeanor charge
[01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  related to the purchase of human tissue.
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  Ironic because, if you recall,
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:45.000]  a grand jury in Houston, Texas,
[01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:48.000]  that had been tasked with looking into the wrongdoing by Planned Parenthood,
[01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:57.000]  announced that it was indicting Daly-Iden and Merritt instead.
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:01:59.000]  The results for the Iowa caucus are as follows.
[01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:04.000]  For the Republican Party, Ted Cruz, 8 delegates, or 27.7 percent.
[01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:07.000]  Donald Trump, 7 delegates, or 24.3 percent.
[01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:10.000]  Mark Rubio, 7 delegates, 23.1 percent.
[01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:14.000]  Ben Carson, 3 delegates, or 9.3 percent.
[01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:20.000]  Rand Paul, 1 delegate, 8,481 votes, 4.1 percent.
[01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:22.000]  Officially, Rand Paul did drop out this morning,
[01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:26.000]  stating the lack of funds and support as his main cause.
[01:02:26.000 --> 01:02:29.000]  Jeb Bush, 1 delegate, at 2.8 percent.
[01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:32.000]  Carly Farina, 1 delegate, at 1.9 percent.
[01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:36.000]  And John Kasich, 1 delegate, at 1.9 percent.
[01:02:36.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  For the Democrats, it was actually decided by a coin toss
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  which gave Hillary 6 wins out of 6 tosses.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:50.000]  Hillary Clinton got 23 delegates and Bernie Sanders 21 delegates.
[01:02:50.000 --> 01:02:57.000]  This has been your Lowdown for February 3rd, 2016.
[01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:23.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:23.000 --> 01:03:25.000]  Randy Kelton moved our radio.
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:27.000]  And we're talking to Charles in Georgia.
[01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:31.000]  I'll make this real quick.
[01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:33.000]  I went over to the district attorney's office
[01:03:33.000 --> 01:03:37.000]  to get a district attorney to verify my criminal complaints.
[01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:39.000]  And sent out a young guy, and he said,
[01:03:39.000 --> 01:03:41.000]  I can't sign these.
[01:03:41.000 --> 01:03:43.000]  I'm just a peon around here.
[01:03:43.000 --> 01:03:45.000]  And I said, what's the matter, chicken?
[01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:46.000]  Darn right.
[01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:49.000]  And I thought, I like this guy.
[01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:53.000]  They got the head of their criminal section to come out.
[01:03:53.000 --> 01:03:54.000]  And he said, I'm not going to sign these.
[01:03:54.000 --> 01:03:55.000]  And just threw them at me.
[01:03:55.000 --> 01:03:56.000]  And papers went everywhere.
[01:03:56.000 --> 01:03:57.000]  And I'm picking them up.
[01:03:57.000 --> 01:03:59.000]  And I said, is there any good reason,
[01:03:59.000 --> 01:04:03.000]  any special reason, or you just peoed today?
[01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:04.000]  I'm just not going to sign them.
[01:04:04.000 --> 01:04:05.000]  I said, okay.
[01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:06.000]  So I go over to the clerk.
[01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:08.000]  I said, ma'am, have you got a lawyer,
[01:04:08.000 --> 01:04:10.000]  an attorney who's literate?
[01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:12.000]  Huh?
[01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:13.000]  You got one who can write?
[01:04:13.000 --> 01:04:16.000]  I need one to verify the criminal affidavits
[01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:18.000]  in accordance with their duty under Article 2.06
[01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:20.000]  Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:04:20.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  And Roger Jones, the head of their criminal section,
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  said, Mr. Colton, you are not welcome here anymore.
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  And I turned around and said, Mr. Jones, I feel disparaged.
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:39.000]  You're going to hurt my feelings.
[01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:42.000]  Mr. Colton, you're going to have to leave the building.
[01:04:42.000 --> 01:04:43.000]  And I knew I shouldn't have done it,
[01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:46.000]  but I just couldn't help myself.
[01:04:46.000 --> 01:04:50.000]  I said, I tell you, you want Mr. Jones,
[01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:53.000]  if you'll just bend over, I'll pull that wild hat
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:55.000]  out of your behind for you,
[01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:57.000]  and you and I can go back to treating one another
[01:04:57.000 --> 01:05:01.000]  like mature and responsible adults.
[01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  He just kind of froze in his tracks.
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:07.000]  He's got about 10 of his underlings behind him,
[01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:09.000]  and they all got their fingers in their mouth,
[01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:12.000]  trying to keep from busting out laughing.
[01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:15.000]  And Mr. Cox steps out the door.
[01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:18.000]  He's the head of their head investigator, and I knew him.
[01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  Ex-Navy SEAL, this first time I looked at him,
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:25.000]  I said to myself, don't mess with this guy.
[01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:28.000]  He's got that calm look about him.
[01:05:28.000 --> 01:05:31.000]  He'll tear your head off.
[01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:33.000]  So I said, well, hello, Mr. Cox.
[01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  Hello, Mr. Colton.
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:38.000]  I said, Mr. Cox pointed at his pistol,
[01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:40.000]  so I see you're packing.
[01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:44.000]  He looked down at it, and he said, yes, Mr. Colton, I am.
[01:05:44.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  Tell me, Mr. Cox, is that pistol loaded?
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:50.000]  Yes, as a matter of fact, it is.
[01:05:50.000 --> 01:05:53.000]  You fixing to pull that pistol on me?
[01:05:53.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  He said, not unless I have to.
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:05:58.000]  I said, well, then let's take a walk, and I held out my elbow.
[01:05:58.000 --> 01:06:01.000]  He took my elbow and walked me out of the office,
[01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:05.000]  and he said, Mr. Colton, what did you do that for?
[01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  I said, well, I've been waiting a long time
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  for them to do something real stupid.
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  He said, now the Roger Jones just committed aggravated.
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  He said, now I got him for aggravated assault,
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:20.000]  and Mr. Cox said, well, Mr. Colton, I didn't assault you.
[01:06:20.000 --> 01:06:22.000]  I said, no, you didn't.
[01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:24.000]  Roger Jones assaulted me.
[01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:26.000]  Well, how did he assault you?
[01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:29.000]  He assaulted me with a deadly weapon.
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  What weapon was that?
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:34.000]  You.
[01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:39.000]  Cox just put his head in his hand, shook his head, oh, geez.
[01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:41.000]  And he was a deadly weapon,
[01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:45.000]  and I didn't dare resist him because my life would be at risk.
[01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:48.000]  He didn't need that pistol to do it.
[01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:55.000]  Well, the point is, everything they do makes it worse.
[01:06:55.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  It goes downhill form fast,
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:07:02.000]  and my producer on the break sent me a present.
[01:07:02.000 --> 01:07:10.000]  He sent me the rules, the duties of the attorney general in Georgia.
[01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:15.000]  And he does, he represents all this stuff.
[01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:17.000]  And then he got this one.
[01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:22.000]  When I read it, I said, holy mackerel, listen to this.
[01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:30.000]  It's the duty of the attorney general to prosecute any state officer
[01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  or other person or entity for violating any criminal statute
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:42.000]  while dealing with or for the state.
[01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  He is the prosecutor of record for your complaints.
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  Yahoo.
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:58.000]  So you definitely want to take these to the prosecuting attorney,
[01:07:58.000 --> 01:08:01.000]  but you don't want to take them there
[01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  until you have every layer of judge
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:12.000]  between the police officer and the attorney general implicated.
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  So you want to take to the attorney general, okay,
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  you want to go to the attorney general after the court of appeals.
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:27.000]  When they refuse to act on it, then you go to the attorney general,
[01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:33.000]  and when he refuses to act on it, you go to the chief justice of the supreme
[01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:36.000]  with criminal complaints against the attorney general
[01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  for not taking criminal complaints against the court of appeals,
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:44.000]  for not taking against the district, against the county,
[01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:51.000]  against the minister, against the mayor, get them all.
[01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:52.000]  Okay.
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:56.000]  The attorney general is going to, with this requirement,
[01:08:56.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  the attorney general is going to be the most vulnerable.
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:04.000]  I wish we had that in Texas.
[01:09:04.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  That is good.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  He is a special prosecutor in this instance.
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  So that's wonderful.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:17.000]  You ought to really wind some clocks.
[01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:20.000]  Everything is political.
[01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:23.000]  And when you're filing against the attorney general
[01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:27.000]  and the chief justice in the federal courts
[01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:32.000]  because of this Trump officer down here on the bottom,
[01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:38.000]  what's likely to happen is the next time somebody turns their lights on you,
[01:09:38.000 --> 01:09:41.000]  they're going to have them on about 30 seconds
[01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:47.000]  and they're going to turn them back off.
[01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  I had a sheriff's deputy come to me once and said,
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  what did you do to the sheriff?
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:54.000]  I said, well, I hadn't done anything to him lately.
[01:09:54.000 --> 01:09:55.000]  Why?
[01:09:55.000 --> 01:09:57.000]  He said, well, we had roll call this morning
[01:09:57.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  and he asked who here knew Randy Kelton.
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  About half of us raised our hand.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:06.000]  He said, look, you are not to stop him.
[01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:09.000]  You are not to cite him.
[01:10:09.000 --> 01:10:14.000]  And whatever you do, don't put that SOB in my jam.
[01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:18.000]  What?
[01:10:18.000 --> 01:10:27.000]  But this would be a great case to take to the feds.
[01:10:27.000 --> 01:10:31.000]  And then they all have to defend in the fed.
[01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  And this is kind of an interesting issue
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:45.000]  in that you're suing the individuals personally for failing to perform a duty.
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  And I guarantee you what's going to happen when you sue them.
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  They're going to get the prosecuting attorney to write their answers for them.
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  Well, in saying that, I'm looking back at the duties of the attorney general.
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  Normally, the defense counsel would be the attorney general.
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:20.000]  But in this case, it couldn't be the attorney general couldn't write any of these
[01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:27.000]  because it would be his duty to prosecute, not to defend.
[01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:34.000]  So it would be really interesting to see who they get to write their responses.
[01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:40.000]  You are suing them in their individual capacities, not in their official capacities.
[01:11:40.000 --> 01:11:47.000]  They're going to claim that they have official immunity.
[01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:55.000]  But you're going to claim that committing crimes in office is not within scope.
[01:11:55.000 --> 01:12:00.000]  So you're not covered by immunity.
[01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:02.000]  Exactly.
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:10.000]  And then if they use a prosecuting attorney, a stated attorney to write their pleadings for them,
[01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:15.000]  then you sue that attorney for misappropriation of public funds.
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:21.000]  We did that here in Austin when the county attorney wrote a answer for a justice in the peace.
[01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  We sued the county attorney. Oh, that was great fun.
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:34.000]  It's really not that hard to do because you're suing every individual for the same thing.
[01:12:34.000 --> 01:12:44.000]  Okay. Now once I got this paper, once I got this information from the clerk at the federal court on Wednesday,
[01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:55.000]  it says, I have to file every individual separately in court and it costs $400 per filing.
[01:12:55.000 --> 01:13:05.000]  No, you don't. That's nonsense. It's $400. It should be $250.
[01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:12.000]  $400? I have the, well, I guess I don't have it here, but yeah, it's $400.
[01:13:12.000 --> 01:13:21.000]  It's going to be $400 for me to file this civil tort claim here in the Northern.
[01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:28.000]  Well, okay. If you file, if you file Rico, that's one suit.
[01:13:28.000 --> 01:13:34.000]  Or even if you file an ongoing criminal conspiracy between all of them to protect one another,
[01:13:34.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  you don't file against each one of them for doing what they did separately.
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  You claim an ongoing criminal conspiracy. So this is all part of one action.
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:55.000]  That ties it all together into one suit.
[01:13:55.000 --> 01:13:56.000]  Okay, great.
[01:13:56.000 --> 01:14:01.000]  So they're going to tell you Crafola to keep you from filing because they don't want you to,
[01:14:01.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  especially if you're pro se, they don't want you in their courts.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:06.000]  Yeah.
[01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:12.000]  So, but if you name them all as part of an ongoing criminal conspiracy, if you don't want to do Rico,
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:18.000]  you could do ongoing criminal conspiracy between all of them to shield from prosecution.
[01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:21.000]  That would be enough to get them.
[01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:32.000]  That would be one suit because each actor in the conspiracy is a necessary party, all one suit.
[01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:33.000]  You file the suit.
[01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:38.000]  First thing you're going to get is a motion to dismiss.
[01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:45.000]  Don't claim fraud claim if they told you anything falsely was misleading, but you're doing due process.
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:51.000]  That should be pretty easy under Marbury State.
[01:14:51.000 --> 01:14:54.000]  Brady under Brady, not Brady.
[01:14:54.000 --> 01:14:58.000]  Brady is your discovery.
[01:14:58.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  There's one primary suit.
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:00.000]  I'll think of it in a second.
[01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  Everybody will know it.
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:07.000]  It's the one that before it said you could sue public officials.
[01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:11.000]  So you file a 42 U.S. Code 1983 suit.
[01:15:11.000 --> 01:15:16.000]  First thing you're going to have to do is a scheduling order.
[01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:24.000]  And if you get that far and get the scheduling order, let me know and I'll send you some copies of scheduling orders.
[01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:36.000]  And then they're going to file a motion to dismiss as kind of standard and probably won't be hard to overcome.
[01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:41.000]  But once you get it filed out, then you want to talk to them about a deal.
[01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:44.000]  Make sure you ask for a lot of money.
[01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:47.000]  A lot.
[01:15:47.000 --> 01:15:52.000]  Well, what are your rights worth to you?
[01:15:52.000 --> 01:16:02.000]  I was denied access to a court a while back and I was talking to a lawyer that we use for something else and I want to take them on.
[01:16:02.000 --> 01:16:04.000]  And well, how much?
[01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  A lot.
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  Well, all they did was deny you access to a court.
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:13.000]  And I said, well, maybe that's not a big deal to you.
[01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:17.000]  But I paid heavy for these rights.
[01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:21.000]  That is a really big deal for me.
[01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:24.000]  So I want big money.
[01:16:24.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  So ask him for big money.
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:28.000]  He could always negotiate down.
[01:16:28.000 --> 01:16:29.000]  Hang on.
[01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:32.000]  Randy Kelton, Radio Martin.
[01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:33.000]  I see you there.
[01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:36.000]  We'll get to you here shortly.
[01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:41.000]  Our call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  Make sure you check out our sponsors.
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:49.000]  We are struggling to get enough funds to keep this thing going.
[01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  For some reason, it's pretty slow this year.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  So we can sure use all the help we can get.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:58.000]  If you find value in what we're offering, help us out with a little back.
[01:16:58.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:26.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:29.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[01:17:29.000 --> 01:17:34.000]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:41.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:57.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:17:57.000 --> 01:18:02.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:02.000 --> 01:18:07.000]  They took our guns and get them back and support the Logos Radio Network at the same time.
[01:18:07.000 --> 01:18:12.000]  The following sponsors have stepped up to help keep this network on air with a fundraising contest.
[01:18:12.000 --> 01:18:17.000]  Thanks to Central Texas Gunworks with the first prize, the Spike Skull Lower Receiver.
[01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:20.000]  Second prize, the Taurus Curve Handgun.
[01:18:20.000 --> 01:18:23.000]  Every $25 donation gets a chance to win.
[01:18:23.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  Enter as often as you like.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  Check out centraltexasgunworks.com.
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:29.000]  Thanks also to mymagicmud.com.
[01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:35.000]  The first 40 people to donate $25 get a jar of My Magic Mud valued at $25.
[01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  Thanks also to All About Vapor at 4631 Airport Boulevard.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  The 10 third place winners will get a $25 gift card.
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  Stop smelling like a butt at allaboutvapor.com.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  Also, thanks to Eddie Craig, folks who buy the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar, get 10 entries into the contest.
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:18:57.000]  Check out the contest rules and details at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:18:57.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  Care status or hipsters may not actually be eligible to win.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:30.000]  Oh, come on.
[01:19:30.000 --> 01:19:31.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:36.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, talking to Charlton, Georgia.
[01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:45.000]  $400, there is the option of filing for inability to pay.
[01:19:45.000 --> 01:19:49.000]  I have that paupers cure.
[01:19:49.000 --> 01:19:50.000]  I have that.
[01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:54.000]  Okay, here is the downside to that.
[01:19:54.000 --> 01:20:00.000]  If you file an action as under a paupers affidavit,
[01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:16.000]  the federal judge has the option of looking over your case and determining whether or not he considers it to be a viable case and he can dismiss it out of hand.
[01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  And since you're mainly suing judges and public officials, you can almost bet he will dismiss it out of hand if you use the paupers affidavit.
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:31.000]  Okay.
[01:20:31.000 --> 01:20:32.000]  They don't like you suing judges.
[01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:35.000]  They like to protect each other.
[01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:42.000]  Federal judges aren't so quick to protect state judges as they are for the federal judges,
[01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:50.000]  but they still don't like especially pro se suing judges because they're afraid they get to sue themselves.
[01:20:50.000 --> 01:20:56.000]  Okay, have I talked your ear off?
[01:20:56.000 --> 01:21:01.000]  I actually have one more small thing now on this stop.
[01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:04.000]  I never produced a physical license.
[01:21:04.000 --> 01:21:12.000]  I just gave him my name and my date of birth at the stop.
[01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:20.000]  I assumed that he went back to the data box in his car and pulled me up,
[01:21:20.000 --> 01:21:25.000]  found out that I don't have a suspended license and I don't have a revoked license.
[01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:28.000]  You have a license in the state of Michigan.
[01:21:28.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  Okay.
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:39.000]  So I remember years ago I was working at a, I had my own contracting company
[01:21:39.000 --> 01:21:44.000]  and I was working with the transportation manager for Hager Schlax
[01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  and he was working with a group of other transportation managers trying to get this commercial license in place.
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:22:04.000]  And part of what they did in that is create reciprocity so that he was saying he could hire a truck driver,
[01:22:04.000 --> 01:22:08.000]  but he could only check the license in this state.
[01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:13.000]  So the guy could have a hundred tickets in other states and he couldn't find out.
[01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:16.000]  And that was one of the things they put together is reciprocity.
[01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:27.000]  So this officer should have been able to find your license no matter what state it was in.
[01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  Did you tell him you had a Michigan license?
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:32.000]  I did.
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  Okay.
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:34.000]  I sure did.
[01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:35.000]  That's enough.
[01:22:35.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  So an absent prima facie evidence to show that you didn't have one,
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:45.000]  you know, he had had a duty to look it up.
[01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:48.000]  Did he ask you to show it to him?
[01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  No, no, no.
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:54.000]  He went back and looked it up, told me I've been here in this state for more than 30 days
[01:22:54.000 --> 01:22:57.000]  and I'm supposed to get a Georgia driver's license.
[01:22:57.000 --> 01:23:00.000]  And he took me to jail.
[01:23:00.000 --> 01:23:01.000]  Okay.
[01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:03.000]  That's good enough then.
[01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:09.000]  How did he determine that you had been in the state more than 30 days?
[01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  He said he looked at the notes in his computer box and it didn't match up with what I told him.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  Now I told him, I said, listen, I have a Michigan license.
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:27.000]  It's valid.
[01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:32.000]  And, you know, I'm in and out of Georgia all the time.
[01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:34.000]  So well, that doesn't match up with what I got here.
[01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  Don't you know that we talk, we communicate and we put notes in this system?
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:44.000]  I said, listen, what are you going to do with your system?
[01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:48.000]  Ooh, you got to ask for all those notes.
[01:23:48.000 --> 01:23:50.000]  Yeah.
[01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  They're not going to allow you to produce that.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:00.000]  You know, when I file for discovery, what I will be doing,
[01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:04.000]  it's going to go two ways my way.
[01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:11.000]  Either they won't produce those notes that he is stating that is supposed to be in this computer
[01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:13.000]  or he will produce them.
[01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:17.000]  And no matter what is on them, nobody has been, you know,
[01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:21.000]  nobody has put a personal spy on me for 29 days
[01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:30.000]  and verify that I've been here for more than 30 at a time.
[01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  On top of that, how long do I have to leave the state to not be eligible for that statute?
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:43.000]  30 seconds.
[01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:48.000]  Do you have a residence in Michigan?
[01:24:48.000 --> 01:24:49.000]  I do.
[01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:50.000]  That's enough.
[01:24:50.000 --> 01:24:52.000]  I sure do.
[01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:53.000]  I sure do.
[01:24:53.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  It's called a domicile.
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  Domicile, right.
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:24:59.000]  I used the wrong term.
[01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  You're domiciled in Texas.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:08.000]  I mean, in Michigan, you may have a temporary residence in Georgia,
[01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  but you're domiciled in Michigan.
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:13.000]  Michigan.
[01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  Yeah, this is pretty straightforward.
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  So he's, you know, arrogant, he figures he can do anything he wants to
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:25.000]  and there's no blowback from it.
[01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  So you and Scott Richardson, he's the one that just filed against the judge
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:35.000]  for yelling at him in court.
[01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  Oh, wonderful.
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:39.000]  So this would be good.
[01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  This is what we need to do.
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:47.000]  And I think you'll find it more than worth the cost and the time
[01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:50.000]  and the education you give.
[01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:55.000]  And there's a good time, good chance they'll come to you and, oh, oops,
[01:25:55.000 --> 01:25:57.000]  almost made a boo-boo.
[01:25:57.000 --> 01:26:03.000]  You have to give them notice and opportunity.
[01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:08.000]  So you have to give them, it's generally 60 days in most states.
[01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:14.000]  You send each one of them, you're going to sue a tort letter.
[01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  You notice them that you intend to sue them
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:21.000]  and they have 60 days to make you home and be sued.
[01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  I've never heard of any of these guys responding to it,
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  but you have to send it to them.
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:30.000]  Okay.
[01:26:30.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  So the first, I have to go, you know, from the officer to the judge
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:38.000]  once she does that, you know, to all of these people,
[01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  I have to send these tort letters.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:43.000]  Tort letter to all of them.
[01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:48.000]  Wait till you get them all lined up, then send them all a tort letter.
[01:26:48.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  And let me come to you and offer you a deal, but not likely.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  But if you do it all the way up to the Chief Justice of the Supreme,
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:27:00.000]  he is not going to be a happy camper.
[01:27:00.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  And he's an easy mark, and I guarantee you,
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:09.000]  when the Chief Justice of the Supreme gets noticed
[01:27:09.000 --> 01:27:14.000]  that you're going to sue him for shielding this officer from prosecution,
[01:27:14.000 --> 01:27:19.000]  this officer's got himself a problem.
[01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  Scott, the officer broke out his window, but he had his video pen turned on,
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  put him on the Internet, he's got 1.8 million hits so far.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  I suspect this cop is not a happy camper at this point.
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  Wow.
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  So this is how we're going to fix it.
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:48.000]  Okay.
[01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:51.000]  Do you have any other questions?
[01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:53.000]  No, not tonight.
[01:27:53.000 --> 01:27:58.000]  I'm going to send you an email with the complaint.
[01:27:58.000 --> 01:28:01.000]  You may want to check it out or you may not.
[01:28:01.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  I worded my complaint based on a previous show that you and Eddie did last week,
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:14.000]  you guys were on the same show one day last week,
[01:28:14.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  and I didn't want to interrupt your show.
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:22.000]  I wanted to hear everything that you guys had to say about how to file a complaint.
[01:28:22.000 --> 01:28:24.000]  I didn't want to put any citations in it,
[01:28:24.000 --> 01:28:28.000]  make sure you don't embellish or put any adjectives or anything like that,
[01:28:28.000 --> 01:28:30.000]  just just facts.
[01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:33.000]  And I hope you didn't listen to everything.
[01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  I hope you didn't listen to the disparaging things Eddie said about me.
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  But I hope you did listen to the disparaging things I said about him.
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:48.000]  Listen, I'm going to let you go so you can get to the next caller.
[01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:50.000]  I do appreciate everything you do there,
[01:28:50.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  and I would like to pledge a 10% portion of the pie if I'm successful at what I'm trying to do,
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:02.000]  because I am trying to make them leave, not only me alone,
[01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:07.000]  but trying to make them leave everybody alone, but at least me.
[01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:12.000]  Whatever it does to everybody else, it'll probably get them to leave you alone.
[01:29:12.000 --> 01:29:18.000]  Okay, thanks a lot, Charles, and keep us up to speed on how this goes.
[01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:20.000]  We are about to go to break.
[01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:22.000]  We've got about 45 seconds.
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  So very quickly, Martin in Iowa.
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:27.000]  Hello, Martin.
[01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:28.000]  Hi, Randy, how are you?
[01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:29.000]  I am good.
[01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  Real quick, we've got about 30 seconds, and then we'll pick you back up on the other side.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  Okay, let me start with this.
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  I'm baffled about the insurance liability law in the state of Iowa.
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:42.000]  Okay, hang on.
[01:29:42.000 --> 01:29:43.000]  We're about to go to break.
[01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Blue's Law Radio.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:51.000]  I call you number 512-646-1984.
[01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:55.000]  A good time to go to our sponsors and check out our gun giveaway
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:29:58.000]  and donate a little to the network and keep us going.
[01:29:58.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  The world's richest woman says in order to get rich, you have to think rich.
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  Okay, but how exactly do you do that?
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:12.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and when I come back,
[01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  I'll explain how rich people think differently from everyone else.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:38.000]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[01:30:38.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:46.000]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  To many wealthy people such as Gina Reinhart, the world's richest woman,
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:55.000]  making lots of money is all about cultivating a mindset, a rich mindset.
[01:30:55.000 --> 01:30:56.000]  So what is that?
[01:30:56.000 --> 01:30:59.000]  Steve Seibold, author of How Rich People Think,
[01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:03.000]  says it starts by understanding that money is not the root of all evil
[01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:07.000]  and that building wealth is best done with other people's money.
[01:31:07.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  The rich, he writes, are prepared to take risks to get rich.
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:13.000]  They'd rather be educated than entertained.
[01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:15.000]  They focus on earning rather than saving,
[01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  and they view selfishness not as a vice but as a virtue.
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:22.000]  Gordon Gekko, eat your heart out, I think.
[01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives,
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  and thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:08.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:31.000]  I'm Dr. Gekko, and I'll see you next time.
[01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:29.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:33.000 --> 01:33:35.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:33:35.000 --> 01:33:38.000]  Randy Kelton, Google Radio, and we're talking to Martin in Iowa.
[01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:40.000]  Martin, can you start that over again?
[01:33:40.000 --> 01:33:42.000]  I had a little trouble hearing you last time.
[01:33:42.000 --> 01:34:01.000]  Okay, hold on.
[01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  Can you move the mic a little bit away from your face?
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:06.000]  Maybe down by your chin.
[01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  The mic seems to be distorting.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:13.000]  Can you hear me better, Randy?
[01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:15.000]  Oh, much better.
[01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:17.000]  My bad.
[01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:19.000]  I was trying to get a...
[01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:22.000]  Don't climb into it so you can hear me better, and it works backwards.
[01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  All right, so my friends I'm trying to help, they were pulled over for a dim headlight,
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:33.000]  asked to present license, et cetera.
[01:34:33.000 --> 01:34:39.000]  They gave them their insurance card, which was valid.
[01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:46.000]  This new gung-ho cop also ran their insurance on some database where,
[01:34:46.000 --> 01:34:52.000]  unbeknownst to my friends, their bank account had not paid a recent one,
[01:34:52.000 --> 01:35:00.000]  so it was just past the grace period, but it showed as being in a state of lapse.
[01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:06.000]  Now, that was a curiosity, meaning, number one, if they showed a valid card,
[01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:11.000]  shouldn't that have just taken care of the issue there itself?
[01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:15.000]  Maybe they have a cause to look it up in their database.
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:18.000]  I'm not familiar with that at all.
[01:35:18.000 --> 01:35:22.000]  But being it as that it's made, in the Iowa Code,
[01:35:22.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  the Section 321.2B says you've got to have insurance.
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:35.000]  But then there's an entire chapter, 321A, that the entire chapter talks about,
[01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  you don't have to have insurance until you're in an accident causing $1,500 in damage.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:48.000]  I have no idea how to help you.
[01:35:48.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  That does not, there has to be something mitigating that.
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:55.000]  So let me make sure I understand this right.
[01:35:55.000 --> 01:35:58.000]  I'm still having a little trouble hearing you.
[01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  So Iowa statutes say you have to have insurance.
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  And then another paragraph says you only have to have insurance if you're in an accident causing more than,
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  did you say $1,500 in damage?
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:18.000]  Yes.
[01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:25.000]  Well, that almost seems contradictory.
[01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  Almost it is.
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  Unless there's something mitigating that.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:45.000]  Now there is the word notwithstanding, and 321.2A, I'm paraphrasing, is notwithstanding 321A.
[01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:48.000]  Notwithstanding.
[01:36:48.000 --> 01:37:00.000]  I'm reading a statute in its own constitution and it says this is the case notwithstanding any laws to the contrary.
[01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:03.000]  I never really understood what notwithstanding means,
[01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:10.000]  but it appears to mean without regard to what anything else may say, this would preempt.
[01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:16.000]  Let me look up notwithstanding.
[01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:24.000]  It means what I think it means and what's the point of the entire chapter of 321A.
[01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:29.000]  See, I've looked it up before and it hasn't really made sense.
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  Notwithstanding, in spite of, nevertheless in spite of, although in spite of, none of this makes sense.
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:49.000]  See, notwithstanding the evidence, the consensus is that the jury will not reach a verdict.
[01:37:49.000 --> 01:38:06.000]  Notwithstanding in that context has to be a term of art because in law we don't use, we tend not to use terms that are vague or ambiguous.
[01:38:06.000 --> 01:38:15.000]  But notwithstanding is definitely vague and ambiguous.
[01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:31.000]  So according to this, in spite of, and each of the definitions that they have as a preposition, adverb, or conjunction all include in spite of.
[01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  So does that say notwithstanding or do you notwithstanding anything to the contrary?
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:46.000]  It just says notwithstanding 321A.
[01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:50.000]  And that's the one that requires you to have insurance?
[01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:52.000]  No.
[01:38:52.000 --> 01:39:03.000]  It says 321.20B says notwithstanding 321A, everybody's got to have liability insurance.
[01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  Oh, okay, and A is the one that says you have to have insurance if you're in an accident over 1,500 and damage?
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:17.000]  Yep.
[01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:21.000]  Okay, so and then the next one says notwithstanding A.
[01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  So that would, I would take that to mean that you have to have insurance always.
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:30.000]  That sounds like something the legislature added.
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:33.000]  But it's always a problem when a...
[01:39:33.000 --> 01:39:37.000]  It's a point itself, having a chapter 321A.
[01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  Wait a minute, say that again?
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:52.000]  If we have one little sentence that says essentially ignore the entire chapter 321A, why is chapter 321A there?
[01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  Okay, we have the same problem in some of our Texas laws.
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:11.000]  We have 14.01 that says that a police officer can arrest someone for an on-site offense if it's a felony or breach of the peace.
[01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  Paragraph B, they added in 1965, says an officer can arrest someone for any on-site offense.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  Well, B is not in paramaterial with A.
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  What you're having here, you've got a paragraph B that's not in paramaterial with the one before it.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:38.000]  Paramaterial means within the body of law.
[01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  So it's outside the body of law.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  The rest of it has got other laws to the contrary.
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  But it does sound like B supersedes A.
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:06.000]  The best I can tell.
[01:41:06.000 --> 01:41:07.000]  I didn't get all that.
[01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:16.000]  Did the officer look up the insurance and find that it was expired?
[01:41:16.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  Yes.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:18.000]  Oh, okay.
[01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  That's card.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:25.000]  And they weren't even aware that the last premium had left.
[01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:36.000]  As a rule, if I was like everywhere else, if your insurance expires, you have a certain number of days to reinstate it.
[01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  You take it down and they'll dismiss.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  Is that a vape?
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:41.000]  They leave it by two days.
[01:41:41.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  Two days.
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:47.000]  That's pretty short.
[01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  And they had it reinstated immediately with a quick phone call.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:55.000]  Okay.
[01:41:55.000 --> 01:42:02.000]  So what is the issue in here or the question?
[01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:10.000]  It seems to me there's got to be something in there that is a double word of art kind of deal.
[01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:22.000]  My understanding is they can't compel you to have insurance coverage because you can't force somebody to get into a contract with a third party, correct?
[01:42:22.000 --> 01:42:24.000]  Yes.
[01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  And this is probably not one we can get out of on the travel issue either because if you have a license, then you can't operate in commerce.
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  So you would have to meet these requirements.
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:54.000]  So I don't think we can get out from it under that.
[01:42:54.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  But what is your, I really didn't get a question there.
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:02.000]  And maybe it's part of having a little trouble here understanding you.
[01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:03.000]  I hear you fine.
[01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:04.000]  You're playing it loud.
[01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:09.000]  I'm just having a little trouble.
[01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  Is it your question about their right to demand that you have insurance, is that the issue?
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:21.000]  Looking for some way for them not to have to pay a $450 ticket.
[01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  And these are the only holes I could find.
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:28.000]  And there's code in itself that said we request.
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:32.000]  When you have one chapter saying one thing and another sentence saying a different thing.
[01:43:32.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  Can you explain that why?
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  Well, one of the things that we do, Mike, have you ever listened to Eddie on the Monday night show?
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  Sure.
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  Yeah, he's a traffic guy.
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:50.000]  But any time you get to the marriage, you're going to get your clock clicked.
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  And hang on, Randy Kelton, we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Sorry.
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  What?
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:15.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt.
[01:44:15.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  And like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:29.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity.
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  But there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  The benefits from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.000 --> 01:46:30.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:30.000 --> 01:46:32.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:35.000]  We're talking to Martin in Iowa.
[01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:40.000]  Martin, any time we go to the parents, we get our clock cleaned.
[01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:43.000]  Have you looked at the...
[01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  Wait a minute.
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  What was the original probable cause for the stop?
[01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:50.000]  Manufactured.
[01:46:50.000 --> 01:46:51.000]  It was ridiculous.
[01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:52.000]  A dim headlight.
[01:46:52.000 --> 01:46:55.000]  I'm not even sure what that means.
[01:46:55.000 --> 01:46:59.000]  A dim headlight.
[01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:01.000]  Uh-huh.
[01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:09.000]  Even then, that's arguing merits.
[01:47:09.000 --> 01:47:13.000]  Have you read the statute on headlights?
[01:47:13.000 --> 01:47:15.000]  Yes.
[01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:18.000]  What does it say?
[01:47:18.000 --> 01:47:21.000]  It must be sufficient.
[01:47:21.000 --> 01:47:29.000]  It must have two headlights that are sufficient to illuminate on high beams a person 500 feet away.
[01:47:29.000 --> 01:47:32.000]  Okay, because that's kind of what Texas said.
[01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:46.000]  Texas used to say it must have at least two lamps lighted to the front, one of which must...at least one of which must be white, and that's to cover motorcycles.
[01:47:46.000 --> 01:47:51.000]  See, a person 1,000 feet on high, 500 on low.
[01:47:51.000 --> 01:48:00.000]  So there was no question that the other light was working perfectly.
[01:48:00.000 --> 01:48:02.000]  Yeah, they were both well.
[01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:03.000]  They were not white and bright.
[01:48:03.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  So he's just saying one's dimmer than the other.
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:11.000]  You could challenge...you could try that, but this is traffic court.
[01:48:11.000 --> 01:48:16.000]  And they're all about collecting money.
[01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:32.000]  So you might look at challenging the validity of the stop, challenging the applicability of the statutes, and then get them to make a deal.
[01:48:32.000 --> 01:48:33.000]  It's all about the money.
[01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:42.000]  If they think you're going to cost them more money fighting it, they might make her a much better deal.
[01:48:42.000 --> 01:48:53.000]  If you try to beat it on the merits, you get to the discretion of the judge and he's always going to rule against you.
[01:48:53.000 --> 01:48:54.000]  At least that's been my experience.
[01:48:54.000 --> 01:48:57.000]  They're not interested in right, wrong, just, whatever.
[01:48:57.000 --> 01:49:02.000]  They're interested in dollar flow.
[01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  And the only way you're going to beat them is show you're going to cost them more than they will make.
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:13.000]  My last one, the judge said, is the prosecution ready?
[01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  And the prosecutor said, no, Your Honor, prosecution is not ready.
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  Case dismissed.
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:19.000]  I object.
[01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:23.000]  Mr. Kelton, you can't object to me dismissing.
[01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:25.000]  I said, yeah, I can.
[01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  We were just about to get to the fun part.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:36.000]  They knew I was going to cost them more money than they could ever make from me.
[01:49:36.000 --> 01:49:40.000]  If you're going to beat them, that's primarily the way you're going to do it.
[01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:46.000]  But calling Eddie on Monday night, he may know something I don't because he primarily does traffic.
[01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:48.000]  I don't do traffic.
[01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:50.000]  Okay.
[01:49:50.000 --> 01:49:51.000]  Okay.
[01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:52.000]  Thank you.
[01:49:52.000 --> 01:49:54.000]  We got one more caller and we're running out of time.
[01:49:54.000 --> 01:49:56.000]  Thanks, Martin.
[01:49:56.000 --> 01:49:57.000]  Okay.
[01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:02.000]  We're going to Betty in Texas.
[01:50:02.000 --> 01:50:03.000]  Hi.
[01:50:02.000 --> 01:50:11.000]  What does she know where the new judicial complaint and the new bar grievance, where did you put them?
[01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:17.000]  You said you were going to make up new ones.
[01:50:17.000 --> 01:50:19.000]  I did make up new ones.
[01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:21.000]  I've been trying to find them.
[01:50:21.000 --> 01:50:31.000]  I'm going to put them on jurisimprudence.com and I'm looking back in my memory and I don't remember that I actually did that.
[01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:39.000]  I may not have because at the time I had some viruses on my server.
[01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:42.000]  First time it was some jerk in Kiev.
[01:50:42.000 --> 01:50:47.000]  And the second time is some guy in China that's putting viruses on my server.
[01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:52.000]  I've got it cleaned up now and I'm glad you brought that up.
[01:50:52.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  I will load those two up.
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:06.000]  And if you go to jurisimprudence.com, top frog on the right goes to documents and research.
[01:51:06.000 --> 01:51:10.000]  You click that and there'll be a folder for blanks.
[01:51:10.000 --> 01:51:14.000]  I'll put them in the blanks folder.
[01:51:14.000 --> 01:51:20.000]  But I'm working on getting bargrievance.net back up.
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:26.000]  I don't own the bargrievance.net anymore, but somebody else said they had it and was going to assign it to me.
[01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:31.000]  But I have bargrievances.net.com.
[01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:35.000]  So I'm working to get that back up.
[01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:42.000]  It's just a lot of work and I've got so much coming at me it's hard to get it all done.
[01:51:42.000 --> 01:51:44.000]  But I have been digging through.
[01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:49.000]  I've got my server cleaned out so I can work my server again and start loading things up.
[01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:53.000]  And I've been digging through the files I have in there.
[01:51:53.000 --> 01:51:58.000]  So I may have one of the questionnaires in a shape that I can put it on the website.
[01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:04.000]  I won't have one right away that will actually wipe the bargrievance.
[01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:06.000]  Oh, you're in Texas, so good.
[01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:16.000]  All you have to do, the grievance form that I have is a PDF fill in the blanks.
[01:52:16.000 --> 01:52:20.000]  So that should be pretty simple.
[01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:33.000]  When I put up the standards, the thing I'm doing with the standards is I've taken the American Bar Association model standards.
[01:52:33.000 --> 01:52:38.000]  And all but three states have adopted these standards.
[01:52:38.000 --> 01:52:43.000]  I've taken those and converted them into a questionnaire.
[01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:50.000]  And as a questionnaire, it allows you to mine through the bulge really fast.
[01:52:50.000 --> 01:52:58.000]  I can pretty well get you to any single grievance within four questions.
[01:52:58.000 --> 01:53:03.000]  Or you can just walk right through the standards to find the one you need.
[01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:13.000]  And with that blank form, once you've found the grievance, there's a section in there for you to state what the lawyer did.
[01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:15.000]  Read the grievance.
[01:53:15.000 --> 01:53:16.000]  Read the grievance.
[01:53:16.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  Read the standard and write your complaint in the verbiage of the standard.
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:35.000]  Now, they tell you not to include case law or statutes in your complaints, but I don't care what they say.
[01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:38.000]  I put them in anyway.
[01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:44.000]  So do you have some lawyers you want to sting?
[01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:47.000]  Yes, but mainly judges.
[01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:48.000]  Oh, that's even better.
[01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:56.000]  Yeah, I'll have the judicial conduct one.
[01:53:56.000 --> 01:54:05.000]  Wait to write up some for a judge using a forgery to remove a person from a homestead.
[01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:09.000]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  Was this a foreclosure or some other type of removal?
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:20.000]  Just getting me out so they could sell the homestead.
[01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:22.000]  Wait a minute.
[01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:24.000]  Wait a minute.
[01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:26.000]  How did they get him out?
[01:54:26.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  Was it an imminent domain?
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:43.000]  No, they used a forgery of a neighbor that stated that I had destroyed some bushes.
[01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:47.000]  They didn't use the term homestead.
[01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:55.000]  They said the house was in dire imminent danger of being destroyed.
[01:54:55.000 --> 01:54:58.000]  Oh, so they condemned it.
[01:54:58.000 --> 01:55:04.000]  No, they just condemned me and put a TRO.
[01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:10.000]  Okay, all of this, this doesn't make much sense so far.
[01:55:10.000 --> 01:55:12.000]  It doesn't make sense.
[01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:24.000]  They said that I was, they got a TRO because they said that the home was in danger, in imminent danger of me destroying it.
[01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:26.000]  Was it your home?
[01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:29.000]  Yes, it was my homestead.
[01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:33.000]  So, okay, something's off here.
[01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:35.000]  Living with the parents.
[01:55:35.000 --> 01:55:40.000]  Because I can destroy my home if I want to.
[01:55:40.000 --> 01:55:42.000]  But see, that's the thing.
[01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:49.000]  I was an unmarried adult living with the family at the time of death.
[01:55:49.000 --> 01:56:05.000]  And under the probate law, Texas probate, I had full rights to, for everything in the house and the property for me to enjoy.
[01:56:05.000 --> 01:56:12.000]  Did you have a, was it in a will?
[01:56:12.000 --> 01:56:18.000]  Yes, it was in the will, but I got everything.
[01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:26.000]  And the judge did not let me give evidence, which is necessary.
[01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:28.000]  And my attorney was in on it.
[01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:38.000]  They said, oh, well, the other side isn't here, so don't worry about your papers and your evidence.
[01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:43.000]  And then they started asking me about my social life.
[01:56:43.000 --> 01:56:50.000]  And I was perplexed.
[01:56:50.000 --> 01:56:58.000]  And so then they came back later and said, oh, well, you didn't prove up the will.
[01:56:58.000 --> 01:57:02.000]  So sue the lawyer.
[01:57:02.000 --> 01:57:04.000]  Sue the lawyer.
[01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:08.000]  Yeah, this sounds like the lawyer threw you under the bus.
[01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:11.000]  Well, he definitely did.
[01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:16.000]  It doesn't sound like the judge acted improperly.
[01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:18.000]  It sounds like the lawyer did.
[01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:22.000]  But probate and family are the most corrupt.
[01:57:22.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  In probate, the lawyers get together and see what they can do to steal the entire estate.
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:35.000]  So I'd suggest you sue the lawyer.
[01:57:35.000 --> 01:57:58.000]  Judicial conduct and bar grievance, definitely, but if the lawyer advised you not to produce evidence and then you lost the case because you followed the lawyer's directions, sue the lawyer for three times what you lost.
[01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:02.000]  That'll break him from sucking eggs.
[01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:14.000]  But the judge appointed a temporary administrator, and that person used the forgery.
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  OK, hold on, hold on.
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:17.000]  We're about out of time.
[01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:25.000]  If you call back in next Thursday, call in earlier, and if there's a forgery document, you can get that rendered void.
[01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  It is void as a matter of law, so you might be able to get everything turned over.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  OK, we are out of time.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:33.000]  Randy Kelton with our radio.
[01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  We'll be back Monday night.
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:41.000]  We'll be back Thursday at eight o'clock and then again Friday at eight.
[01:58:41.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:57.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.000 --> 01:59:53.000]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:53.000 --> 02:00:12.000]  You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.