ROL_2015-10-12_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily
[00:06.000 --> 00:13.000]  bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:13.000 --> 00:21.000]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.000 --> 00:28.000]  Markets for the 12th of October 2015 opened up with gold at $1,163.52 an ounce, silver
[00:28.000 --> 00:35.000]  at $15.82 an ounce, Texas crude at $49.63 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting
[00:35.000 --> 00:43.000]  at about $247 U.S. currency.
[00:43.000 --> 00:49.000]  Today in history, Tuesday, October 12, 1999, Adnan Nevec, a Bosnian, is proclaimed the
[00:49.000 --> 00:54.000]  sixth billionth living human being on planet Earth. He was born in the capital of Sarajevo
[00:54.000 --> 00:59.000]  two minutes after midnight, roughly 16 years later, and we are headed towards a population
[00:59.000 --> 01:04.000]  of 7.4 billion.
[01:04.000 --> 01:08.000]  In recent news, while most of the nation was commemorating Christopher Columbus Day, a
[01:08.000 --> 01:13.000]  list of growing cities, counties, and states were celebrating Indigenous Peoples Day instead.
[01:13.000 --> 01:17.000]  Eleven cities, one county, and one state partook in Indigenous Peoples Day, with many more
[01:17.000 --> 01:21.000]  expected to sign along. The entire state of South Dakota began calling it Native Americans
[01:21.000 --> 01:26.000]  Day back in 1990, followed by Berkeley, California, setting the trend of declaring it Indigenous
[01:26.000 --> 01:32.000]  Peoples Day for the first time in 1992. Seattle, Washington, and Minneapolis, Minnesota, made
[01:32.000 --> 01:37.000]  the change last year, while this year Portland, Oregon, Lawrence, Kansas, Albuquerque, New
[01:37.000 --> 01:42.000]  Mexico, St. Paul, Minnesota, Bexar County, Texas, Anadarko, Oklahoma, Olympia, Washington,
[01:42.000 --> 01:48.000]  Alpine, Minnesota, and Carboro, North Carolina have added themselves to the list, with Governor
[01:48.000 --> 01:53.000]  Bill Walker signing an executive proclamation declaring today as Indigenous Peoples Day
[01:53.000 --> 02:00.000]  in Alaska as the latest addition.
[02:00.000 --> 02:04.000]  Houston County Sheriff's Homicide Detective Craig Clopton was suspended Friday after he
[02:04.000 --> 02:08.000]  admitted to consensual sexual relationship with the unidentified witness to the August
[02:08.000 --> 02:13.000]  28 shooting death of Deputy Darren Goforth at a gas station in Houston, Texas. Sheriff
[02:13.000 --> 02:17.000]  Ron Hickman told reporters in announcing the suspension that this investigator's conduct
[02:17.000 --> 02:22.000]  was unethical and inexcusable and does not reflect the core values of Harris County Sheriff's
[02:22.000 --> 02:26.000]  office. Anthony Oso, the attorney of Shannon Miles, the man accused of killing Sheriff
[02:26.000 --> 02:31.000]  Darren Goforth, told Fox26 that he believed the witness is the same woman who claimed
[02:31.000 --> 02:35.000]  to be romantically linked to Goforth and was a key witness at the gas station the night
[02:35.000 --> 02:40.000]  of the shooting. Attorney also told Fox26 that this love triangle should open public's
[02:40.000 --> 02:47.000]  eyes for a look at the credibility and integrity of the investigation.
[03:10.000 --> 03:27.000]  6 o'clock noon, somebody's been shot, somebody's been abused, somebody blew up a building,
[03:27.000 --> 03:35.000]  somebody stole their car, somebody got away, somebody didn't get too far, yeah, they didn't
[03:35.000 --> 03:45.000]  get too far. Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day son, a man had to answer for the
[03:45.000 --> 03:52.000]  ways that he done, take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree, round up all of them
[03:52.000 --> 04:05.000]  bad boys hang up high in the street, for all the people to see. That justice is what they
[04:05.000 --> 04:10.000]  should always find, you gotta settle up your balls, you gotta draw a hard line, when the
[04:10.000 --> 04:16.000]  gun's full, we'll settle, we'll sing a victory tune and we'll all be back at the
[04:16.000 --> 04:25.000]  same time. We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces saying, let's get for my men,
[04:25.000 --> 04:32.000]  bear for my forces. Alright folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio
[04:32.000 --> 04:40.000]  Show with your host Eddie Craig. It is October 12, 2015. We are running into the last quarter
[04:40.000 --> 04:46.000]  of this year and the longer we stay on the air around here and the more that we see,
[04:46.000 --> 04:52.000]  the more we have to bring to you that should make your blood boil and give you the impetus
[04:52.000 --> 04:57.000]  you need to get off of your duff and go out and start getting in the faces of your friends
[04:57.000 --> 05:01.000]  and neighbors and asking them why they're allowing the things to go on that are going
[05:01.000 --> 05:09.000]  on in municipalities, counties and our state legislature as they are. We have become so
[05:09.000 --> 05:15.000]  disenfranchised from our government officials and those that are supposed to be serving
[05:15.000 --> 05:23.000]  us that we no longer feel like we have control of anything. When you take that mindset, you
[05:23.000 --> 05:30.000]  don't. Now, I have Randy Kelton on with me tonight as my special guest to talk about
[05:30.000 --> 05:36.000]  an issue that he has knowledge of. I don't know the full details. I only know a minor
[05:36.000 --> 05:42.000]  amount of it that we spoke about today before we got into the show tonight. Just enough
[05:42.000 --> 05:47.000]  for me to say, okay, let's go on the air and talk about this. So, Randy is here with us
[05:47.000 --> 05:51.000]  and he's going to go over the specific details of what we're dealing with and then we're
[05:51.000 --> 05:55.000]  going to spend some time talking about what to do about it. All right, Randy, can you
[05:55.000 --> 05:59.000]  fill us in on what was going on? You said this was over in Lakeside, Texas, right?
[05:59.000 --> 06:07.000]  Yeah, Lakeside, Texas, real small town just on the western edge of Fort Worth. And you
[06:07.000 --> 06:13.000]  spoke to people not being terribly motivated to do something about all this. Well, I have
[06:13.000 --> 06:21.000]  an employee and she was kind of in that category. She knew what I did but she didn't take it
[06:21.000 --> 06:30.000]  as serious as I did. And then she got a speeding ticket in Lakeside, Texas. So, she wanted
[06:30.000 --> 06:35.000]  me to do something to make the ticket go away. So, I wrote her a challenge to subject matter
[06:35.000 --> 06:44.000]  jurisdiction. We went to the court, she filed it and apparently it annoyed the judge. Seems
[06:44.000 --> 06:50.000]  to have hurt her feelings because we were all in the courtroom, myself and David, someone
[06:50.000 --> 06:57.000]  else I work with. And the first thing they did to send her out to have to play let's
[06:57.000 --> 07:03.000]  make a deal with the prosecutor and she wouldn't make a deal so they come back in. And the
[07:03.000 --> 07:08.000]  very first thing the prosecutor addressed was a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction.
[07:08.000 --> 07:14.000]  He objected that it was not filed seven days before the hearing, the way the rules require
[07:14.000 --> 07:23.000]  promotions. But this wasn't a motion, it was a pleading and it was a very special pleading.
[07:23.000 --> 07:31.000]  Subject matter jurisdiction challenge can be filed at any time. So, the judge appealed
[07:31.000 --> 07:37.000]  the motion and denied the challenge subject matter jurisdiction. And then the prosecutor
[07:37.000 --> 07:46.000]  asked who we were, myself and David. And she noticed that we were sitting with the defendant
[07:46.000 --> 07:54.000]  and we said we're friends of the defendant. And then they asked the defendant if we would
[07:54.000 --> 07:59.000]  be called as witnesses and she said no, they have no personal knowledge of anything that
[07:59.000 --> 08:05.000]  occurred. And then he asked us and we told him we had no personal knowledge of anything
[08:05.000 --> 08:12.000]  that occurred. And then he told the judge that he considered us potential witnesses
[08:12.000 --> 08:18.000]  and invoked the rule to have us thrown out of the courtroom. And we're outside and the
[08:18.000 --> 08:28.000]  next thing we know they're bringing her out in handcuffs. They found her guilty and insisted
[08:28.000 --> 08:32.000]  that she pay the fine immediately. She told them she didn't have enough money to pay the
[08:32.000 --> 08:37.000]  fine immediately that she'd have to get money from one of us out in the hall and she didn't
[08:37.000 --> 08:40.000]  have enough with her. And the judge told her you should have thought of that before you
[08:40.000 --> 08:47.000]  came here and wouldn't let her get enough to pay the fine. And then insisted that she
[08:47.000 --> 08:54.000]  sign an agreement to pay over time and she said if I do that I'll waive my right to appeal
[08:54.000 --> 08:58.000]  and I have a challenge subject matter jurisdiction with courts. Court has no jurisdiction to
[08:58.000 --> 09:06.000]  start with so I can't do that. So she held her in contempt and for 72 hours they took
[09:06.000 --> 09:18.000]  her to jail. Well, that wasn't cool. So I immediately asked the officer who actually
[09:18.000 --> 09:24.000]  did the arrest came out and I asked him to take a criminal complaint against the judge
[09:24.000 --> 09:32.000]  prosecutor and he refused which I expected. So I dialed 911 and asked for an officer
[09:32.000 --> 09:39.000]  to be sent to arrest this officer and the sheriff's department came out and there was
[09:39.000 --> 09:44.000]  a deputy first and he didn't know what to do and then a lieutenant showed up and I happened
[09:44.000 --> 09:52.000]  to know that lieutenant, Lieutenant Murphy. And I wanted Lieutenant Murphy to arrest this
[09:52.000 --> 10:00.000]  officer here for Class A misdemeanor, a fiscal oppression, criminal violation, 3903 Penal
[10:00.000 --> 10:05.000]  Code. He said he wasn't going to arrest the officer. So well in that case I want you to
[10:05.000 --> 10:11.000]  take my criminal complaint against the officer, against the judge and against the prosecutor.
[10:11.000 --> 10:17.000]  And while I'm talking to the lieutenant, the officer that I was making the complaint against
[10:17.000 --> 10:24.000]  told me that we were going to have to leave the premises. I turned around and looked at
[10:24.000 --> 10:31.000]  him and I said, man, you really don't know when to stand back and keep your mouth shut.
[10:31.000 --> 10:38.000]  I'm making a criminal accusation against you to this lieutenant and you're ordering me
[10:38.000 --> 10:41.000]  to leave the premises. Are you kidding me? I said you need to stand back there and be
[10:41.000 --> 10:49.000]  quiet. And I figured he was going to get excited, but he didn't. He stepped back, closed his
[10:49.000 --> 10:56.000]  mouth. I guess he realized what he was getting into. What he didn't realize is even though
[10:56.000 --> 11:05.000]  he stepped back, that bell had already been rung. So the lieutenant refused to take the
[11:05.000 --> 11:11.000]  complaint, which I expected. And I said, well, okay, that's what I needed. I needed to ask.
[11:11.000 --> 11:16.000]  You needed to refuse. So from here, we'll take it to the Texas Rangers. And David was
[11:16.000 --> 11:22.000]  with me. He said, when I mentioned Texas Rangers, he said every eyebrow in the place jacked
[11:22.000 --> 11:31.000]  up about 10 degrees. So we left there and I went down to the jail and asked to see a
[11:31.000 --> 11:37.000]  copy of the commitment order, because this was Lakeside, Texas. And they took her to
[11:37.000 --> 11:46.000]  a jail in Westworth, Texas, Westworth Village. It's a little town that's actually surrounded
[11:46.000 --> 11:55.000]  by Fort Worth. Odd thing went on there. They said they weren't actually holding her. I
[11:55.000 --> 12:02.000]  said, is she in this jail? She says, yes, she is. But we have a contract with Lakeside
[12:02.000 --> 12:10.000]  to use our facilities. Oh, so Lakeside has its own jailers down here. Oh, no, we use
[12:10.000 --> 12:16.000]  our jailers. Then I want to see your commitment order. Well, they said, as far as I know,
[12:16.000 --> 12:20.000]  we don't have one. If you want it, you'll have to make a written request. I can do that.
[12:20.000 --> 12:28.000]  I gave them a written request and they emailed me back saying they had no documents responsive
[12:28.000 --> 12:35.000]  to my request, exactly what I asked her to do. Actually, this was the next morning. I
[12:35.000 --> 12:40.000]  had, on the way in, I stopped at Lakeside, first thing, and asked them for a copy of
[12:40.000 --> 12:45.000]  the commitment order. And they refused to produce it, said that I have to wait 10, put
[12:45.000 --> 12:54.000]  it in a written request and wait 10 days. Well, I put in the written request over my
[12:54.000 --> 12:59.000]  objection. And then I went down to the jail and put in a written request there. And they
[12:59.000 --> 13:05.000]  emailed me a response back immediately. And the reason I needed the commitment order,
[13:05.000 --> 13:12.000]  and I told them at Lakeside, is I needed it for habeas corpus I was filing. So they didn't
[13:12.000 --> 13:17.000]  produce it. I went to the other jail. Then I went down to the district court. The district
[13:17.000 --> 13:22.000]  court in Tarrant County said, since this is Class A misdemeanor, I filed the habeas with
[13:22.000 --> 13:26.000]  the county court. So I went to the county court. And the judge who had heard habeas
[13:26.000 --> 13:30.000]  wasn't in that day. There's another judge that hears them. And he had just left. So
[13:30.000 --> 13:36.000]  I went, I had the clerk call every judge and get every judge to refuse to accept the habeas.
[13:36.000 --> 13:44.000]  I found a judge in court having a cattle call and went in there and walked up to the bar
[13:44.000 --> 13:49.000]  and pouted to the bailiff, you come here. And he just stood there. So I hollered out
[13:49.000 --> 13:54.000]  in the courtroom. He's standing right next to the judge. Mr. Bailiff instruct the judge
[13:54.000 --> 14:00.000]  that I have business with the court that supersedes any business now before this court.
[14:00.000 --> 14:06.000]  The judge motioned him over. I handed him the habeas, took it to the judge. The judge
[14:06.000 --> 14:10.000]  looked at it, gave it back to him. Told him to give it to me. Gave it to me, he said,
[14:10.000 --> 14:16.000]  Your Honor, this is a habeas, writ of habeas corpus. You need to hear it. I'm not going
[14:16.000 --> 14:21.000]  to hear the habeas. With all due respect, Your Honor, no matter what you've got going
[14:21.000 --> 14:26.000]  here, everything stands down before the writ and you have a duty to hear it. Well, I'm
[14:26.000 --> 14:30.000]  not going to hear it. That's your last word on the subject? Yes, it is. Thank you. And
[14:30.000 --> 14:35.000]  I left the courtroom because it was getting kind of intense. I will be filing criminal
[14:35.000 --> 14:42.000]  charges against them. But by the time I got out of there, I had my phone was ringing and
[14:42.000 --> 14:50.000]  they had let Tony out of jail. I guess they decided not to hold her 72 hours. But when
[14:50.000 --> 14:57.000]  she got out of jail, I talked to her. And when they got her to the jail, now this is
[14:57.000 --> 15:07.000]  on contempt, another judge held a hearing. And when they took her to the to the hearing
[15:07.000 --> 15:14.000]  room, I don't want to say courtroom because said room in the jail, the officer who had
[15:14.000 --> 15:21.000]  arrested her, who had gave her the ticket was in talking to the judge. And then she
[15:21.000 --> 15:33.000]  went in and the judge began threatening her, taunting her, telling told her that I have
[15:33.000 --> 15:42.000]  to get the statement of facts to get it all. But he told her that he accused her of getting
[15:42.000 --> 15:47.000]  smart with the other judge and being disrespectful with the other judge. He told her, you go
[15:47.000 --> 15:52.000]  ahead and be disrespectful to me. I'll keep you here for 12 days and add it to the 72
[15:52.000 --> 15:59.000]  hours. And you just file one of your fancy pleadings. Well, that was interesting. File
[15:59.000 --> 16:06.000]  one of your fancy pleadings. Well, then when they let her out, when I came, when I picked
[16:06.000 --> 16:10.000]  her up, I asked her to see a copy of the commitment order because the clerk told me she had a
[16:10.000 --> 16:16.000]  copy. Well, she didn't have one and she asked for one when she got out. And they didn't
[16:16.000 --> 16:27.000]  have one. I don't think one existed. So here we are. The real one I'm really after is the
[16:27.000 --> 16:34.000]  judge that held the second hearing. Now, from what you know of law, when we get back for
[16:34.000 --> 16:42.000]  break, I want to know what authority that judge had to convene a hearing. We'll see
[16:42.000 --> 16:48.000]  what we can figure out about that. All right, folks, this is rule of law radio Monday night
[16:48.000 --> 16:53.000]  show with my guest tonight, Randy Kelton. We'll be right back after this. So if you're
[16:53.000 --> 16:56.000]  on the board, y'all just hang on. We're going to be with us for a little bit, but we'll
[16:56.000 --> 17:02.000]  start taking your calls when we get done. Through advances in technology, our lives
[17:02.000 --> 17:07.000]  have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. People feed their pets better
[17:07.000 --> 17:12.000]  than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense against
[17:12.000 --> 17:18.000]  aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. In a world where natural
[17:18.000 --> 17:23.000]  foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the
[17:23.000 --> 17:29.000]  nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[17:29.000 --> 17:35.000]  most of which we reject. We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing
[17:35.000 --> 17:41.000]  distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from Logos
[17:41.000 --> 17:47.000]  Radio Network.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you
[17:47.000 --> 17:53.000]  realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you
[17:53.000 --> 17:59.000]  can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:59.000 --> 18:04.000]  Order now. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even
[18:04.000 --> 18:10.000]  losses? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael Mears
[18:10.000 --> 18:15.000]  has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win too.
[18:15.000 --> 18:19.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.000 --> 18:25.000]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.000 --> 18:30.000]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[18:30.000 --> 18:35.000]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mears proven method
[18:35.000 --> 18:41.000]  is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:47.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner,
[18:47.000 --> 18:54.000]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l
[18:54.000 --> 19:00.000]  m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:00.000 --> 19:23.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradio.com.
[19:23.000 --> 19:34.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your
[19:34.000 --> 19:39.000]  host, Eddie Craig, and my guest tonight, Randy Kelton. And we are discussing an ongoing case
[19:39.000 --> 19:46.000]  in Lakeway with someone that Randy knows. And you asked a question before we went to
[19:46.000 --> 19:49.000]  break, Randy. Would you refresh everyone's memory?
[19:49.000 --> 20:00.000]  Yes. The woman is arrested for contempt of court, and she's taken and put in the jail.
[20:00.000 --> 20:10.000]  Well, when she got to the jail, a judge there held a hearing. The question is, where did
[20:10.000 --> 20:18.000]  that judge get authority to hold a hearing? Let me back up a little bit, kind of explain
[20:18.000 --> 20:25.000]  the part, the way I treat these things. You know, when these guys play hardball, they
[20:25.000 --> 20:33.000]  do their little dance, and when they get done, that's when we start doing our dance. They
[20:33.000 --> 20:41.000]  had their fun. Now it's our turn. We don't get angry. We don't get frustrated. We don't
[20:41.000 --> 20:51.000]  feel betrayed. We get serious. Okay. You guys did all these things. Let's see how we can
[20:51.000 --> 21:00.000]  take them apart and how we can strip down what you've done and apply it to code.
[21:00.000 --> 21:10.000]  First off, they denied David and I the right to a public court. And we'll be bar grieving
[21:10.000 --> 21:16.000]  both the judge. The judge is the municipal court, so the judge is a lawyer. And the prosecutor,
[21:16.000 --> 21:17.000]  they're both lawyers.
[21:17.000 --> 21:23.000]  Well, not necessarily. Not necessarily. Just so you know, in a court of record. Okay. But
[21:23.000 --> 21:24.000]  this would make me...
[21:24.000 --> 21:31.000]  In this case, we checked beforehand. I wanted to know if the judge was learned at counsel.
[21:31.000 --> 21:37.000]  This was not a court of record, so it didn't have to be an attorney. But we checked going
[21:37.000 --> 21:46.000]  in and they both were attorneys. And that's a good point. So they're both bar card carriers
[21:46.000 --> 21:53.000]  for the moment. So I'll file a bar grievance against them. David will file a bar grievance
[21:53.000 --> 22:03.000]  against them. And Tony will file a bar grievance against them for that, for denying her, all
[22:03.000 --> 22:10.000]  of us, a public court. And then we will walk through the code with Tony and bar grieve
[22:10.000 --> 22:16.000]  them on everything. Every place they stepped out of line, we bar grieve them. Failing to
[22:16.000 --> 22:27.000]  hear the challenge subject matter jurisdiction. For them, that is a really, really big deal.
[22:27.000 --> 22:38.000]  Because when a case is initiated, when a complaint and files a complaint with a magistrate, a
[22:38.000 --> 22:49.000]  magistrate finds probable cause and institutes a criminal action. The jurisdiction of the
[22:49.000 --> 22:56.000]  court is presumed until it's challenged. Most anything in law, if you go in and make a proactive
[22:56.000 --> 23:03.000]  statement of fact or law, it's presumed to be regular unless it's challenged. Someone
[23:03.000 --> 23:08.000]  can go in and make a statement that's totally false. If you don't challenge it, the court
[23:08.000 --> 23:14.000]  accepts it is true. But once it's challenged, then it must be proven. And subject matter
[23:14.000 --> 23:19.000]  jurisdiction is exactly the same way. Once it's challenged, it's no longer presumed to
[23:19.000 --> 23:26.000]  be regular. It must be proven. And subject matter jurisdiction may be challenged at any
[23:26.000 --> 23:34.000]  time. So there is no seven day period before the hearing to file. All that stuff don't
[23:34.000 --> 23:39.000]  apply to a challenge subject matter jurisdiction. So when we filed it, jurisdiction was lost.
[23:39.000 --> 23:45.000]  They refused to hear it. They never got it back. There's only one time you can sue a
[23:45.000 --> 23:52.000]  judge for the most part. It's two times actually. And they all actually equate to one. It's
[23:52.000 --> 23:58.000]  when he acts as a subject matter jurisdiction. What you normally hear about when you can
[23:58.000 --> 24:04.000]  sue a public official is when they act outside scope. But when you're talking to a judge
[24:04.000 --> 24:08.000]  about a judge and the judge purports to act in their official capacity, we go directly
[24:08.000 --> 24:13.000]  to challenge subject matter jurisdiction. If a judge has no subject matter jurisdiction,
[24:13.000 --> 24:19.000]  he's only pretending to be a judge. He only vaguely looks like a judge, but he's not really
[24:19.000 --> 24:26.000]  a judge. So he's not cloaked in his immunity. Prosecutor has no immunity. Nobody has any
[24:26.000 --> 24:34.000]  immunity when there is no original subject matter jurisdiction. Okay. Bar grieve them
[24:34.000 --> 24:41.000]  all. At least three, probably six or seven by the time we get done. By the time we get
[24:41.000 --> 24:49.000]  six or seven bar grievances against them and several judicial conduct complaints, that
[24:49.000 --> 24:59.000]  will probably end their careers. I don't normally like to go after a public official's career.
[24:59.000 --> 25:08.000]  These guys earned it, especially the second judge. But we will accuse the second judge
[25:08.000 --> 25:17.000]  of acting in concert and collusion with first judge and the prosecutor and the mayor and
[25:17.000 --> 25:24.000]  every member of the city council has responded yet superior. We talk about how everything's
[25:24.000 --> 25:33.000]  political. Just wait until we start filing criminal charges against the mayor and the
[25:33.000 --> 25:39.000]  city council. And the way we're going to do that is with some Eddie Craig, some of Eddie
[25:39.000 --> 25:46.000]  Craig stuff. So as we walk down the codes, you know, I have a challenge subject matter
[25:46.000 --> 25:58.000]  jurisdiction here and it goes to who can enforce the traffic code. And it says that the sheriff
[25:58.000 --> 26:08.000]  of every county, see, enforcement of the Texas transportation code is limited by section
[26:08.000 --> 26:19.000]  701.001 as follows, except as provided by subsection C. We'll get to that in a second.
[26:19.000 --> 26:24.000]  Acting in conjunction with the sheriff of the county, the commissioner's court of the
[26:24.000 --> 26:32.000]  county may employ not more than five regular deputies as county traffic officers. Except
[26:32.000 --> 26:38.000]  as provided by subsection C, the commissioner's court may employ not more than two additional
[26:38.000 --> 26:46.000]  deputies as county traffic officers to aid the regular officers in special emergencies.
[26:46.000 --> 26:51.000]  Subsection C, the limitation on the number of deputies that may be employed under subsection
[26:51.000 --> 26:59.000]  A and B does not apply to a county with a population of more than two million. Okay,
[26:59.000 --> 27:08.000]  that's cool. Now, once these five were appointed, then they have to be certified, certification
[27:08.000 --> 27:14.000]  of certain peace officers. The department shall establish procedures, including training
[27:14.000 --> 27:19.000]  for the certification of municipal police officers, sheriffs, and deputy sheriffs to
[27:19.000 --> 27:25.000]  enforce this chapter. A police officer of any of the following municipalities is eligible
[27:25.000 --> 27:31.000]  to apply for certification under this section, a municipality with a population of 50,000
[27:31.000 --> 27:39.000]  or more, a municipality with a population of 25,000 or more, and any part of which is
[27:39.000 --> 27:45.000]  located in a county with a population of half a million or more, a municipality with a
[27:45.000 --> 27:51.000]  population of less than 25,000, and any part of which is located in a county with a population
[27:51.000 --> 28:03.000]  of 3.3 million. And that contains or is adjacent to an international port. For a municipality
[28:03.000 --> 28:09.000]  with a population of at least 34,000 that is located in a county that borders two or
[28:09.000 --> 28:16.000]  more states, a municipality, any part of which is located in a county bordering the United
[28:16.000 --> 28:24.000]  Mexican states, a municipality with a population of less than 5,000 that is located adjacent
[28:24.000 --> 28:30.000]  to a bay connected to the Gulf of Mexico, and in a county adjacent to a county with
[28:30.000 --> 28:38.000]  a population of 3.3 million. That would be two counties next to Houston. A municipality
[28:38.000 --> 28:45.000]  is located within 25 miles of an international airport, I'm sorry, an international port
[28:45.000 --> 28:53.000]  and in a county that does not contain a highway that is part of the National Highway Interstate
[28:53.000 --> 29:01.000]  Defense Highways and is adjacent to a county with a population greater than 3.3 million.
[29:01.000 --> 29:08.000]  That probably refers to a single county near Houston. A municipality with a population
[29:08.000 --> 29:16.000]  less than 8,500, that is a county seat and contains a highway that is part of the National
[29:16.000 --> 29:25.000]  System of Interstate and Defense Highways, or a deputy sheriff of a county bordering
[29:25.000 --> 29:31.000]  the United Mexican states, or of a county with a population of 1 million or more is
[29:31.000 --> 29:38.000]  eligible to apply for certification under SEC. The sheriff's deputy, but let me finish
[29:38.000 --> 29:45.000]  this on the other side. This is good stuff. Will be. Is this the nuts or what? It will
[29:45.000 --> 29:49.000]  be. All right, hang on just a second folks, we're going to take a quick break and then
[29:49.000 --> 29:53.000]  we'll be right back. So y'all hang in there and listen up because this story is going
[29:53.000 --> 29:58.000]  to get even better.
[29:58.000 --> 30:05.000]  Would you spend the entire day watching store surveillance videos if you didn't have to?
[30:05.000 --> 30:10.000]  I didn't think so, but some people apparently would and they'll even pay for the privilege.
[30:10.000 --> 30:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back to tell you about video voyeurs.
[30:15.000 --> 30:21.000]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database
[30:21.000 --> 30:27.000]  of your personal information. That's creepy. But it doesn't have to be that way. StartPage.com
[30:27.000 --> 30:31.000]  is the world's most private search engine. StartPage doesn't store your IP address, make
[30:31.000 --> 30:35.000]  a record of your searches or use tracking cookies, and they're third party certified.
[30:35.000 --> 30:41.000]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with StartPage. Great search results
[30:41.000 --> 30:45.000]  and total privacy. StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:45.000 --> 30:50.000]  Imagine sitting in the corner of a store watching people buy the same products day after boring
[30:50.000 --> 30:56.000]  day. That's the life of the average security camera, yawn. But a British company called
[30:56.000 --> 31:01.000]  Internet Eyes gets people to pay to watch these video streams. They pay around 20 bucks,
[31:01.000 --> 31:06.000]  then members log on to watch UK stores and streets for criminal activity, hoping to win
[31:06.000 --> 31:11.000]  a monthly prize for being the most eagle-eyed. The plan is revolting, but it really went
[31:11.000 --> 31:16.000]  sour when members started posting YouTube videos of the unsuspecting shoppers. It's
[31:16.000 --> 31:20.000]  what you'd expect from the sort of person who enjoys watching surveillance cameras in
[31:20.000 --> 31:25.000]  the first place. Some people really need to get a life. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:25.000 --> 31:30.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.000 --> 31:35.000]  What are you thinking? Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body
[31:35.000 --> 31:42.000]  detox for around $10 a month. If USA.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder for
[31:42.000 --> 31:47.000]  absorbing and removing toxins from your kidneys, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon,
[31:47.000 --> 31:53.000]  and feel better than ever, it alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products
[31:53.000 --> 32:02.000]  that save you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367 only at musa.org.
[32:02.000 --> 32:06.000]  Wool of Law Radio is proud to offer the Wool of Law traffic seminar. In today's America,
[32:06.000 --> 32:10.000]  we live in an us-against-them society. If we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:14.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the
[32:14.000 --> 32:17.000]  right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:17.000 --> 32:21.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least
[32:21.000 --> 32:25.000]  expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.000 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Wool of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.000 --> 32:33.000]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.000 --> 32:37.000]  is and how to hold courts to the Wool of Law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable
[32:37.000 --> 32:41.000]  material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now,
[32:41.000 --> 32:44.000]  you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus
[32:44.000 --> 32:49.000]  the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents,
[32:49.000 --> 32:52.000]  and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help
[32:52.000 --> 32:56.000]  of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, and together we can
[32:56.000 --> 33:01.000]  have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:01.000 --> 33:08.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[33:31.000 --> 33:40.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. This is your host, Eddie Craig,
[33:40.000 --> 33:45.000]  with my co-host for the night, Mr. Randy Kelton. All right, Randy, please continue.
[33:45.000 --> 33:53.000]  Okay, in this whole scenario, this particular town, Lakeside, Texas, has approximately
[33:53.000 --> 34:02.000]  1,300 population. That puts them within Section 8, a municipality with a population of less
[34:02.000 --> 34:11.000]  than 8,500. They have to be the county seat, which they're not, and they have to contain
[34:11.000 --> 34:17.000]  a highway that's part of the national system of interstate and defense highways, which
[34:17.000 --> 34:27.000]  they do not. So according to the Texas Transportation Code, this municipality cannot
[34:27.000 --> 34:38.000]  have one of its officers qualified to be certified to enforce the traffic code, period.
[34:38.000 --> 34:48.000]  Now, the first thing we're going to do is we'll be putting in requests for their certifications,
[34:48.000 --> 34:55.000]  and we'll start working a routine on them. When we do this, you know, on my show, I keep
[34:55.000 --> 35:01.000]  saying never ask a public official to do anything you actually want them to do. And that's
[35:01.000 --> 35:06.000]  because you never ask a public official to do anything that the law does not specifically
[35:06.000 --> 35:14.000]  command them to do. That way you get to hammer them when they don't do it. So this goes to
[35:14.000 --> 35:20.000]  our challenge to subject matter jurisdiction. Now, once we demonstrated they didn't have
[35:20.000 --> 35:24.000]  it and couldn't have it, and they had the documentation in their hand and refused to
[35:24.000 --> 35:29.000]  read it, and I don't think they had paid any attention to it if they had, but in any case,
[35:29.000 --> 35:35.000]  they acted without subject matter jurisdiction. And then they found her guilty and demanded
[35:35.000 --> 35:43.000]  that she pay the fine immediately. Well, hey, what is wrong with that? The moment a fine
[35:43.000 --> 35:51.000]  gets paid, you have lost your right of appeal. How long do you have to pay a fine? Until
[35:51.000 --> 36:01.000]  the appeal has been completed. Or you have 10 days to file an appeal or pay the fine.
[36:01.000 --> 36:09.000]  So you have 10 days no matter what. Correct. And then once you file a notice of appeal,
[36:09.000 --> 36:14.000]  then all of this stops until the appeal is ended. Well, they wanted to make sure that
[36:14.000 --> 36:21.000]  she waived her right to appeal. And then when she wouldn't go for it, the judge lost her
[36:21.000 --> 36:29.000]  cool and arrested her for contempt of court for doing what the law specifically allowed
[36:29.000 --> 36:39.000]  her to do. And then once she was arrested and they took her to the other jail, then
[36:39.000 --> 36:48.000]  this judge, second judge, held a hearing, and the judge had prior knowledge of what
[36:48.000 --> 36:56.000]  occurred in the first hearing. So the bailiff of the court is the one that
[36:56.000 --> 37:06.000]  transported the woman from Lakeside, the municipality of Lakeside, to the jail.
[37:06.000 --> 37:13.000]  Not the officer who wrote the citation. But the officer who wrote the citation, he
[37:13.000 --> 37:16.000]  stayed there and I worked him over. And then after I got done with him, he must have
[37:16.000 --> 37:25.000]  ran over to the jail and talked to the judge. And they had themselves an ex parte hearing
[37:25.000 --> 37:32.000]  or an ex parte communication of some sort. And then the judge came in and did this
[37:32.000 --> 37:37.000]  little thing he did. And I keep saying judge, and that's really not appropriate.
[37:37.000 --> 37:43.000]  Because in some circumstances and instances, he may actually have been a judge,
[37:43.000 --> 37:51.000]  but not in this one. She was arrested on contempt of court. When you're arrested on
[37:51.000 --> 37:56.000]  contempt of court, there is no right to examining trial. There's nothing. You go
[37:56.000 --> 38:07.000]  straight to jail. And primary question is where did this judge get authority to
[38:07.000 --> 38:13.000]  speak to this woman at all? And then threaten her to boot? Threaten her.
[38:13.000 --> 38:22.000]  3605, tampering with a witness. He threatened her to prevent her from filing
[38:22.000 --> 38:32.000]  another one of her fancy pleadings. And then he threatened her with jail time.
[38:32.000 --> 38:43.000]  That's retaliation 3606 Penal Code. Both of those are felonies. And it's my contention
[38:43.000 --> 38:54.000]  that the original municipal judge, Tanya Fox, I think, no, no, something Fox,
[38:54.000 --> 39:05.000]  Judge Fox. Judge Fox sent that officer over to talk to Judge Ken, don't have his
[39:05.000 --> 39:12.000]  name in front of me. Anyway, the judge for, he's a judge for West Lake Village
[39:12.000 --> 39:19.000]  and Lakeside. And yes, we are using their actual names. Before the show's over,
[39:19.000 --> 39:24.000]  I'll get his actual name so we can broadcast it on air. The guy was a judge
[39:24.000 --> 39:32.000]  advocate general in the military and he was a assistant district attorney and now
[39:32.000 --> 39:38.000]  he's an appellate judge and he's a municipal judge. What this tells me is he
[39:38.000 --> 39:44.000]  was not the sharpest knife in the drawer. So he couldn't make it out there in the
[39:44.000 --> 39:49.000]  real world where they make the big bucks. So he's working for the government making
[39:49.000 --> 39:56.000]  chump change. And here he is 45 years on in his career and he's a municipal judge
[39:56.000 --> 40:04.000]  for three local municipalities making chump change. So he's obviously not the
[40:04.000 --> 40:09.000]  sharpest knife in the drawer. And he's one of these guys that's been around a
[40:09.000 --> 40:16.000]  long time and he's completely lost respect for you and I. A public servant
[40:16.000 --> 40:22.000]  who's lost respect for the masters. So let's see if we can't adjust his
[40:22.000 --> 40:30.000]  attitude. He has a problem in that he is in Tarrant County and I've got the door
[40:30.000 --> 40:36.000]  to the grand jury pride wide open in Tarrant County. When I take criminal
[40:36.000 --> 40:41.000]  complaints against public officials to Tarrant County I go straight to the grand
[40:41.000 --> 40:46.000]  jury handle the debate if he takes him straight to the grand jury nobody touches
[40:46.000 --> 40:55.000]  him. So we're looking at a criminal ongoing criminal conspiracy on part of
[40:55.000 --> 41:05.000]  the municipality to extort money from citizens under the guise of enforcing the
[41:05.000 --> 41:09.000]  traffic code when they have no authority to enforce the traffic code. And this is
[41:09.000 --> 41:14.000]  a good one to go after because it's a real small municipality and they don't
[41:14.000 --> 41:23.000]  have unlimited funds. So we'll sue the mayor. Every city council member has
[41:23.000 --> 41:31.000]  responded yet superior. We'll sue the city manager because I've got a couple
[41:31.000 --> 41:36.000]  complaints against him. City manager is also the chief of police. We'll sue the
[41:36.000 --> 41:40.000]  clerk who's the city manager and chief of police or lieutenant on the police
[41:40.000 --> 41:47.000]  department, his wife. We'll sue the judge and the prosecutor. Actually we'll sue
[41:47.000 --> 41:54.000]  three judges because the first time she went in she signed the ticket and
[41:54.000 --> 41:59.000]  agreed to appear. She appeared on that day and she demanded an examining trial
[41:59.000 --> 42:08.000]  and he refused to give her one. So we'll sue all of them. We'll sue this second
[42:08.000 --> 42:16.000]  judge. We'll sue Westlake Village for acting in concert and collusion and we
[42:16.000 --> 42:23.000]  will take them all to the grand jury. Create a set of complaints
[42:23.000 --> 42:29.000]  demonstrating an ongoing criminal conspiracy and demonstrate how when
[42:29.000 --> 42:35.000]  public officials start violating laws in order to perpetrate this kind of
[42:35.000 --> 42:43.000]  nonsense you have to violate a lot of laws. And one of the hard things to get
[42:43.000 --> 42:49.000]  a grand jury to wrap your head around is how these otherwise right-minded
[42:49.000 --> 42:58.000]  individuals can be committing so many crimes. Well it's because we have a very
[42:58.000 --> 43:05.000]  well-structured Corpus Juris and they didn't put all these protections in
[43:05.000 --> 43:12.000]  there for you and me. The scoundrels knew that they weren't the only scoundrels
[43:12.000 --> 43:16.000]  and the scoundrels put these protections in there to protect themselves from
[43:16.000 --> 43:28.000]  other scoundrels. But you and I get to use them. So Eddie, this is my analysis.
[43:28.000 --> 43:34.000]  What have I missed? Well I'll pick that part of it up when we get back on the
[43:34.000 --> 43:39.000]  other side and we'll start with a discussion of what the sheriff has been
[43:39.000 --> 43:45.000]  allegedly authorized to do and why he can't actually do it. All right folks
[43:45.000 --> 43:48.000]  this is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host Eddie Craig and
[43:48.000 --> 43:51.000]  my special guest Randy Kelton. We'll be right back after this break so y'all
[43:51.000 --> 44:16.000]  hang in there.
[44:21.000 --> 44:25.000]  You should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course
[44:25.000 --> 44:31.000]  and now you can too. Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with
[44:31.000 --> 44:36.000]  22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit you can
[44:36.000 --> 44:41.000]  learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that
[44:41.000 --> 44:45.000]  control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video
[44:45.000 --> 44:52.000]  seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more. Please
[44:52.000 --> 45:03.000]  visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.000 --> 45:08.000]  Hello my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like
[45:08.000 --> 45:12.000]  to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street Sweet D here in
[45:12.000 --> 45:16.000]  Austin, Texas. I'm Brave New Books and Chase Banks to see all our fantastic
[45:16.000 --> 45:20.000]  health and wellness products with your very own eyes. Have a look at our
[45:20.000 --> 45:23.000]  Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. Take a
[45:23.000 --> 45:27.000]  peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Eme oil,
[45:27.000 --> 45:35.000]  lotion candles, olive oil soaps and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043
[45:35.000 --> 45:42.000]  or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043
[45:42.000 --> 45:46.000]  naturespureorganics.com. Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on
[45:46.000 --> 46:14.000]  events and our products. naturespureorganics.com.
[46:14.000 --> 46:21.000]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one? If you could
[46:21.000 --> 46:29.000]  not wait any longer, would you purposefully die? Such a gentleman, a soldier, a warrior
[46:29.000 --> 46:35.000]  of love scuffle and they keep the peace. All they're taking is a misunderstanding.
[46:35.000 --> 46:48.000]  Somebody calls the police. What's in the spotlight? What's in the spotlight?
[46:48.000 --> 46:53.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show. Now
[46:53.000 --> 46:56.000]  with my special guest tonight, Randy Kelton, we are going over an issue in
[46:56.000 --> 47:02.000]  Lakeside, Texas and Randy asked me before we went to break what he had missed so
[47:02.000 --> 47:07.000]  far and not so much that he missed, but we haven't had an opportunity to discuss
[47:07.000 --> 47:12.000]  exactly what the Transportation Code has allegedly authorized the Sheriff's
[47:12.000 --> 47:16.000]  Department and their deputies to do as far as enforcement of the Transportation
[47:16.000 --> 47:20.000]  Code. Now there's a couple things here that you need to understand about
[47:20.000 --> 47:27.000]  enforcement of codes. All of the statutes are regulatory interpretations of
[47:27.000 --> 47:35.000]  underlying law. Regulatory statutes are agency written in most cases. They may
[47:35.000 --> 47:40.000]  be approved by the legislature, but they're agency written. In this case, in
[47:40.000 --> 47:45.000]  the Transportation Code, there are only two agencies, the Department of Public
[47:45.000 --> 47:49.000]  Safety and the Department of Transportation. The Department of
[47:49.000 --> 47:52.000]  Transportation is responsible for any chapters dealing with marking,
[47:52.000 --> 47:58.000]  maintenance, design and building of roads and bridges and drainage and all
[47:58.000 --> 48:04.000]  that other kind of stuff and public safety is all within the purview of the
[48:04.000 --> 48:11.000]  Department of Public Safety, DPS. Now in all of the Transportation Code
[48:11.000 --> 48:18.000]  enforcement chapters, the only place where it specifically gives power
[48:18.000 --> 48:25.000]  generally to a peace officer is in 543.001 of the Transportation Code to
[48:25.000 --> 48:32.000]  perform arrest without warrant. However, the Transportation Code, unlike other
[48:32.000 --> 48:38.000]  places in the Code, in that specific section does not say the term peace
[48:38.000 --> 48:44.000]  officer means peace officer as defined by section, what is it Randy, in the
[48:44.000 --> 48:52.000]  penal code 2.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that defines peace officer?
[48:52.000 --> 48:55.000]  2.13 defines their duties.
[48:55.000 --> 48:57.000]  Yeah, 2.12 defines who is a peace officer.
[48:57.000 --> 49:01.000]  I'm sorry, not who, I'm sorry. Yeah, okay, yeah, 2.12 and then 2.13 defines
[49:01.000 --> 49:02.000]  their duties.
[49:02.000 --> 49:09.000]  Yes, 1.2 defines who are peace officers. Now DPS and public cops or local cops
[49:09.000 --> 49:15.000]  and stuff, they're all on that list, but the Transportation Code does not say
[49:15.000 --> 49:21.000]  the term peace officer as used in that section applies to all of the people
[49:21.000 --> 49:26.000]  listed in 2.12 and you will find that everywhere else in the Transportation
[49:26.000 --> 49:33.000]  Code where it says peace officers, if it means the ones in 2.12, it
[49:33.000 --> 49:38.000]  specifically states that it means the ones in 2.12.
[49:38.000 --> 49:43.000]  Maybe I can clarify that a little bit.
[49:43.000 --> 49:49.000]  They're talking about peace officers, but this is in the Transportation Code
[49:49.000 --> 49:58.000]  and when you read 644001, who can enforce the traffic code?
[49:58.000 --> 50:03.000]  Certification of certain peace officers.
[50:03.000 --> 50:09.000]  Only peace officers can be certified as police officers, so they have to be a
[50:09.000 --> 50:19.000]  peace officer first and in 543001, that peace officer is enforcing the traffic
[50:19.000 --> 50:26.000]  code, so he must be one of these five officers who meet this certification.
[50:26.000 --> 50:32.000]  Yes, he is a peace officer, but in order to enforce the traffic code, he also
[50:32.000 --> 50:34.000]  has to have this certification.
[50:34.000 --> 50:35.000]  That's true.
[50:35.000 --> 50:40.000]  However, in all of the specific chapters dealing with public safety enforcement
[50:40.000 --> 50:46.000]  of the code, the department that is given the inherent power to do the
[50:46.000 --> 50:50.000]  enforcing is always the Department of Public Safety.
[50:50.000 --> 50:52.000]  It is not the sheriff.
[50:52.000 --> 50:54.000]  It is not the local police departments.
[50:54.000 --> 51:02.000]  That is the reason why they must be certified by the DPS in order to do any enforcement.
[51:02.000 --> 51:09.000]  And that's why they only need five, because we have a whole branch,
[51:09.000 --> 51:13.000]  essentially a branch of government, a whole force.
[51:13.000 --> 51:19.000]  Their only purpose is to enforce the traffic code.
[51:19.000 --> 51:20.000]  Correct.
[51:20.000 --> 51:22.000]  So we already got people to do that.
[51:22.000 --> 51:24.000]  There's still a caveat even to that.
[51:24.000 --> 51:27.000]  But let me finish this analogy here, and then we'll get to that one.
[51:27.000 --> 51:32.000]  The fact of the matter is, is that since the only direct authority to enforce is
[51:32.000 --> 51:38.000]  assigned to what is termed the department by definition, and the definition of
[51:38.000 --> 51:44.000]  department is the Department of Public Safety and its officers, they are the
[51:44.000 --> 51:50.000]  only peace officer defined in 543 that has outright enforcement authority.
[51:50.000 --> 51:51.000]  They're the only one.
[51:51.000 --> 51:58.000]  That's why it does not say a peace officer as defined by 2.12, because in this
[51:58.000 --> 52:05.000]  particular code, it is limited to Department of Public Safety peace officers and
[52:05.000 --> 52:11.000]  those that have been specifically certified by the Department of Public Safety.
[52:11.000 --> 52:15.000]  That hasn't happened in most of these municipalities because they don't meet
[52:15.000 --> 52:17.000]  the criteria required.
[52:17.000 --> 52:21.000]  That's why the Department of Public Safety, if you ask through a public
[52:21.000 --> 52:25.000]  information request to find out who has met the requirements under 644 as
[52:25.000 --> 52:32.000]  defined by Rule 4.13 of the Texas Administrative Code under Title 37, you
[52:32.000 --> 52:40.000]  will get back a list of 63 names that are not DPS officers, 63 in all of Texas.
[52:40.000 --> 52:44.000]  Now that was back five, six years ago.
[52:44.000 --> 52:48.000]  Now there's no telling, but I guarantee you it's not more than that.
[52:48.000 --> 52:51.000]  It may even be less.
[52:51.000 --> 52:55.000]  But here is where they run into an even bigger problem, and remember what I
[52:55.000 --> 53:00.000]  said about the agency or someone representing the agency being the one
[53:00.000 --> 53:05.000]  responsible for the language of the statutes, not the legislature.
[53:05.000 --> 53:08.000]  And here is proof positive of that.
[53:08.000 --> 53:16.000]  They have allowed the statute to include authority assignment or enforcement
[53:16.000 --> 53:23.000]  to the sheriff's department and to the constables, both offices of which are
[53:23.000 --> 53:26.000]  created by the Texas Constitution.
[53:26.000 --> 53:31.000]  Here's the problem I was coming to originally in this part of this, and that
[53:31.000 --> 53:40.000]  is that agency enforcement of regulatory infraction codes are executive functions.
[53:40.000 --> 53:41.000]  Okay, hang on.
[53:41.000 --> 53:46.000]  I have a piece of information for you that came to me from somewhere else.
[53:46.000 --> 53:47.000]  Okay.
[53:47.000 --> 53:50.000]  Chevron Deference, you ever heard of it?
[53:50.000 --> 53:52.000]  No.
[53:52.000 --> 53:55.000]  You're going to love this.
[53:55.000 --> 54:06.000]  What it says is, is that when the legislature created regulatory agencies,
[54:06.000 --> 54:12.000]  that it delegated to those agencies authority to make determinations.
[54:12.000 --> 54:20.000]  The case that it's originally from is Chevron USA, Inc., the Natural Resources
[54:20.000 --> 54:25.000]  Defense Council, and it went through some EPA issues.
[54:25.000 --> 54:31.000]  And the court said that the decision of the regulatory agency was not correct,
[54:31.000 --> 54:40.000]  that there was an issue here that was not directly addressed by the legislature.
[54:40.000 --> 54:44.000]  And the regulatory agency made a determination about a certain type of
[54:44.000 --> 54:52.000]  filter, whether it was substantial or effective or not.
[54:52.000 --> 54:56.000]  And the court second-guessed the regulatory agency.
[54:56.000 --> 55:03.000]  And what the ruling was is that when the legislature fails to specifically
[55:03.000 --> 55:11.000]  address a particular issue, but the legislature has set up a regulatory
[55:11.000 --> 55:19.000]  agency, that it delegates authority to the regulatory agency to make those
[55:19.000 --> 55:25.000]  determinations, and the courts have no power to second-guess the regulatory
[55:25.000 --> 55:28.000]  agency.
[55:28.000 --> 55:35.000]  Well, only the appeals in Supreme can address those issues and only in two
[55:35.000 --> 55:38.000]  very narrow cases.
[55:38.000 --> 55:45.000]  Where the assignment are making determinations as to the regulations
[55:45.000 --> 55:47.000]  themselves, I will agree with you.
[55:47.000 --> 55:53.000]  But what the courts can do in relation to overruling a regulatory agency is
[55:53.000 --> 55:58.000]  when the regulatory agency acts in violation of the Constitution in its
[55:58.000 --> 56:00.000]  determinations and its assignments.
[56:00.000 --> 56:09.000]  Two very narrow exceptions, and one, where the regulation is manifestly at
[56:09.000 --> 56:15.000]  odds with the intent of the legislature, and two, where the determination of
[56:15.000 --> 56:19.000]  the regulatory agency is in violation of the Constitution.
[56:19.000 --> 56:20.000]  Okay.
[56:20.000 --> 56:22.000]  Well, here's where we're going to get into violation of the Texas
[56:22.000 --> 56:27.000]  Constitution, and here's exactly how they're doing it in multiple ways.
[56:27.000 --> 56:30.000]  This is how we fight against the transportation code, Randy.
[56:30.000 --> 56:31.000]  This is what we do.
[56:31.000 --> 56:36.000]  The whole code can be proven to be absolutely unconstitutional using
[56:36.000 --> 56:43.000]  nothing more than the signed, enrolled bill and the language of Article 3.
[56:43.000 --> 56:45.000]  It's that simple.
[56:45.000 --> 56:48.000]  But here, let me deal with the sheriff first.
[56:48.000 --> 56:52.000]  The sheriff, everyone considers law enforcement.
[56:52.000 --> 56:57.000]  Everyone knows law enforcement as a general principle is defined as an
[56:57.000 --> 57:03.000]  executive function because the law is the regulatory scheme that's in place
[57:03.000 --> 57:05.000]  that everybody's doing their enforcing through.
[57:05.000 --> 57:07.000]  But that's an executive function.
[57:07.000 --> 57:14.000]  Well, folks, in Texas, the sheriff, his deputies, and the constables are not
[57:14.000 --> 57:16.000]  executive officers.
[57:16.000 --> 57:18.000]  They are judicial.
[57:18.000 --> 57:24.000]  Article 5, Section 23, Texas Constitution, sheriffs.
[57:24.000 --> 57:29.000]  There shall be elected by the qualified voters of each county a sheriff who
[57:29.000 --> 57:33.000]  shall hold his office for the term of four years, whose duties,
[57:33.000 --> 57:38.000]  qualifications, perquisites, and fees of office shall be prescribed by the
[57:38.000 --> 57:42.000]  legislature and vacancies in whose office shall be filed by the
[57:42.000 --> 57:45.000]  Commissioner's Corps until the next general election.
[57:45.000 --> 57:50.000]  That is the section that creates the office of sheriff.
[57:50.000 --> 57:53.000]  He is a judicial officer.
[57:53.000 --> 58:00.000]  The only law he can enforce by Constitution is the Constitution.
[58:00.000 --> 58:08.000]  Anything else runs afoul of the Bill of Rights, Article 2 of the Texas
[58:08.000 --> 58:14.000]  Constitution, Separation of Powers, where any member of one department is
[58:14.000 --> 58:20.000]  forbidden to exercise the power and authority of any member of any other
[58:20.000 --> 58:22.000]  department.
[58:22.000 --> 58:26.000]  This is exactly the problem with having lawyers in the legislature when they
[58:26.000 --> 58:31.000]  have an active bar card because they are judicial officers under the Bar
[58:31.000 --> 58:35.000]  Act of 1939.
[58:35.000 --> 58:37.000]  But I'll get into more details of this on the other side.
[58:37.000 --> 58:40.000]  We're about to take a top-of-the-hour break.
[58:40.000 --> 58:50.000]  Folks, y'all hang on, we shall return.
[58:50.000 --> 58:55.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are
[58:55.000 --> 58:58.000]  frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:03.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process
[59:03.000 --> 59:07.000]  can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:14.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real
[59:14.000 --> 59:18.000]  story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:23.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing
[59:23.000 --> 59:27.000]  an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced
[59:27.000 --> 59:28.000]  before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:32.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for
[59:32.000 --> 59:33.000]  the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:38.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll
[59:38.000 --> 59:48.000]  free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:01.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:01.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  your daily bulletins for the commodities market.
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:14.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the
[01:00:14.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  alternatives.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:27.000]  Markets for the 12th of October 2015 opened up with gold at $1,163.52 an ounce,
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:34.000]  silver $15.82 an ounce, Texas crude $49.63 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[01:00:34.000 --> 01:00:43.000]  sitting at about $247 U.S. currency.
[01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:48.000]  Today in history, Tuesday, October 12, 1999, Adnan Navek, a Bosnian, is
[01:00:48.000 --> 01:00:51.000]  proclaimed the sixth billionth living human being on planet Earth.
[01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:56.000]  He was born in the capital of Sarajevo two minutes after midnight, roughly 16
[01:00:56.000 --> 01:01:00.000]  years later, and we are headed towards a population of 7.4 billion.
[01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:06.000]  In recent news, while most of the nation was commemorating Christopher
[01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:10.000]  Columbus Day, a list of growing cities, counties, and states were celebrating
[01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  Indigenous Peoples Day instead.
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:16.000]  Eleven cities, one county, and one state partook in Indigenous Peoples Day,
[01:01:16.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  with many more expected to sign along.
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:21.000]  The entire state of South Dakota began calling it Native Americans Day back in
[01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  1990, followed by Berkeley, California, setting the trend of declaring it
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:29.000]  Indigenous Peoples Day for the first time in 1992.
[01:01:29.000 --> 01:01:33.000]  Seattle, Washington, and Minneapolis, Minnesota, made the change last year,
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:36.000]  while this year Portland, Oregon, Lawrence, Kansas, Albuquerque, New
[01:01:36.000 --> 01:01:40.000]  Mexico, St. Paul, Minnesota, Bexar County, Texas, Anadarko, Oklahoma,
[01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:45.000]  Olympia, Washington, Alpine, Minnesota, and Carboro, North Carolina have
[01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:49.000]  added themselves to the list, with Governor Bill Walker signing an
[01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:53.000]  executive proclamation declaring today as Indigenous Peoples Day in Alaska as
[01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:55.000]  the latest edition.
[01:01:55.000 --> 01:02:03.000]  Houston County Sheriff's Homicide Detective Craig Clopton was suspended
[01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:06.000]  Friday after he admitted to consensual sexual relationship with the
[01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:10.000]  unidentified witness to the August 28 shooting death of Deputy Darren Goforth
[01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:12.000]  at a gas station in Houston, Texas.
[01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  Sheriff Ron Hickman told reporters in announcing the suspension that this
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:20.000]  investigator's conduct was unethical and inexcusable and does not reflect the
[01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:23.000]  core values of Harris County Sheriff's Office.
[01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:26.000]  Anthony Oso, the attorney of Shannon Miles, the man accused of killing
[01:02:26.000 --> 01:02:30.000]  Sheriff Darren Goforth, told Fox26 that he believed the witness is the same
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:34.000]  woman who claimed to be romantically linked to Goforth and was a key witness
[01:02:34.000 --> 01:02:37.000]  at the gas station the night of the shooting.
[01:02:37.000 --> 01:02:41.000]  Attorney also told Fox26 that this love trial should open public's eyes for a
[01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:46.000]  look at the credibility and integrity of the investigation.
[01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors.
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:53.000]  If you have a call after a service you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to
[01:02:53.000 --> 01:02:57.000]  give us a call at 210-363-2257.
[01:02:57.000 --> 01:03:20.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown for October 12, 2015.
[01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:43.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:03:43.000 --> 01:03:45.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:48.000]  All right, now I'm going to run through this real quick.
[01:03:48.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  You're going to pay close attention because I am going to connect the dots in
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:55.000]  the statutory issues we're dealing with here.
[01:03:55.000 --> 01:04:01.000]  Now, while it is true that Section 23 does allow the sheriff's duties to be
[01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:06.000]  defined by the legislature, we have an issue here.
[01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:10.000]  And the issue is when it comes to enforcement of the transportation code by
[01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:13.000]  anyone for any reason.
[01:04:13.000 --> 01:04:17.000]  You will notice the transportation code, if you've read my first book, has
[01:04:17.000 --> 01:04:20.000]  several deficiencies from the very get-go.
[01:04:20.000 --> 01:04:24.000]  In the very first section of the very first paragraph, at the end you will
[01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:30.000]  find this language, without substantive change.
[01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:35.000]  Now, what that means in legislative parlance is that when they renumbered,
[01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:40.000]  reorganized, rewrote the new version of the transportation code they enacted
[01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:49.000]  in 1995, that they did not make any material legal changes to what it
[01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:52.000]  contained.
[01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:54.000]  That is a lie.
[01:04:54.000 --> 01:04:57.000]  And here's your first piece of proof.
[01:04:57.000 --> 01:05:02.000]  In the original code, Chapter 6701 and 6704 of the original Vernon's
[01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  Annotated Civil Statutes, there are only three licenses defined in the law,
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:16.000]  chauffeur's license, commercial operator's license, and operator's license.
[01:05:16.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  None of those three licenses exist in the current statutes.
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:23.000]  None of them.
[01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:29.000]  So not only were the only licenses authorized by law removed, because the
[01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:31.000]  statute, remember, is not the law.
[01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  It is an agency interpretation of the underlying law.
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:40.000]  And they cannot amend the purpose, intent, or legislative acts through
[01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:43.000]  amendment of the statute.
[01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  They cannot change the original purpose of it or the intent of it through
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:49.000]  amending statute.
[01:05:49.000 --> 01:05:53.000]  If they're going to change that, they have to repeal the original act and
[01:05:53.000 --> 01:06:00.000]  reenact it in its entirety, pursuant Article 3 of the Texas Constitution.
[01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:05.000]  Now, since they changed, and remember, there are several cases in Texas that
[01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:10.000]  specifically says that there was no such thing in Texas law as a driver's
[01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:18.000]  license, and they are still correct, because the statutory addition of the
[01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:25.000]  term driver's license now contains three licenses the original act does not
[01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:32.000]  recognize, a temporary license without reference to it being a temporary of
[01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:38.000]  one of the original three, a learner's permit without it being a reference as
[01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:45.000]  a learner's permit for one of the original three, and an occupational license,
[01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:52.000]  which makes no reference to it being a substitute for the surrendering of one
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  of the original three after a conviction.
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  So the licenses currently put into this version of the statute are in no way
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:08.000]  related to the original licenses from which they allegedly was no substantive
[01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:09.000]  change.
[01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  Now, that's just one way you can identify that substantive changes exist,
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:19.000]  that they created something in the new code that the courts themselves said
[01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:22.000]  did not exist in the original code.
[01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:25.000]  Now, let's follow this a little further.
[01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:29.000]  When you go through Article 3, Section 29 through 40 of the Texas Constitution,
[01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:33.000]  you see how laws are to be made in Texas.
[01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:39.000]  One of those requirements in Article 3, Section 32, is that the bill be read in
[01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:46.000]  its entirety on the floor of each house over three several days prior to it
[01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:49.000]  being voted on.
[01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:55.000]  That was not done with the recodification of the transportation code.
[01:07:55.000 --> 01:08:01.000]  They did not read 3,889 pages on the floor of each house over three several
[01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  days and hold open discussion on any provision of it.
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:08.000]  How do we know this?
[01:08:08.000 --> 01:08:14.000]  Because the enrolled bill contains the sign-off page by the legislative
[01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:22.000]  members of each house, the speakers of each house, that said they waived the
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:28.000]  reading on the floor and passed it the way it was written.
[01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  Here's the problem.
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  The only way they can suspend the rule of reading on the floor of each house is
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:43.000]  under the provisions of Article 3, Section 62 of the Texas Constitution.
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:50.000]  And Article 3 specifically states that the only way those rules can be suspended
[01:08:50.000 --> 01:08:55.000]  is through a declaration of emergency by the governor, and it must be a written
[01:08:55.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  proclamation. It must be signed by the lieutenant governor, the governor, and
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  the speaker of each house all in agreement that such a state of emergency
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:14.000]  exists and that that state of emergency is directly related to disasters
[01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:17.000]  resulting from enemy attack.
[01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:23.000]  That is the only way the Constitution authorizes the suspension of the reading
[01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:26.000]  on the floor of each house.
[01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:32.000]  The emergency clause used at the end of the enrolled bill tells us that is not
[01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:34.000]  what they did.
[01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:39.000]  It tells us that the reason they suspended the rule on the reading of the
[01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:44.000]  floor of each house over three several days was because of the crowded
[01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:51.000]  conditions of the calendar of each house creating a public emergency necessity.
[01:09:51.000 --> 01:09:54.000]  Now, here's the problem.
[01:09:54.000 --> 01:10:00.000]  Your legislator has violated the Texas Constitution under the governmental
[01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  rule of necessity.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:10.000]  In other words, necessity knows no law is the way the maxim goes.
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:16.000]  The problem is we didn't authorize them to create that necessity.
[01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:21.000]  We didn't authorize them to use a governmental law of necessity to suspend
[01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:27.000]  any part of the Constitution for any reason because you know why?
[01:10:27.000 --> 01:10:33.000]  Another important part of 62 is that it specifically prohibits the suspension
[01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  of any part of the Bill of Rights.
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  So if the legislature or the courts can suspend the requirement on how laws are
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  to be made and when the laws supporting that creation can be suspended,
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:54.000]  if they can waive them for any cause whatsoever,
[01:10:54.000 --> 01:11:04.000]  then none of the Constitution and none of our rights are safe ever.
[01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:08.000]  Now, Randy, I don't know what you think,
[01:11:08.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  but I think you've got more bludgeons in this bag than you can possibly shell out.
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:16.000]  Yeah.
[01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:20.000]  Anytime these kinds of things occur,
[01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:28.000]  I wind up with far more complaints than I could ever adjudicate.
[01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:31.000]  It's an important point for people to understand.
[01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:37.000]  When public officials start stepping outside the limits of their authority,
[01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  they create a horrible quagmire for themselves.
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  The only thing that allows them to do it is that we don't hold them responsible for it.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:52.000]  We don't have to do it every time.
[01:11:52.000 --> 01:11:57.000]  Just every once in a while we need to sting them good.
[01:11:57.000 --> 01:11:59.000]  And here we're going to sting them good.
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:06.000]  And the hardest thing here or the most important thing we do is we collect up
[01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:11.000]  all of the violations that we can.
[01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:13.000]  I wouldn't have went in today, but it was a holiday.
[01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:22.000]  Tomorrow I will go in and get these municipalities to violate a whole bunch more laws.
[01:12:22.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  And what I want to do is get enough violations so that I can go through them
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  and pick out the violations that point toward a knowing
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  and deliberate criminal conspiracy on part of the actors.
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:46.000]  I don't care if there really is a knowing and deliberate criminal conspiracy
[01:12:46.000 --> 01:12:47.000]  on part of the actors.
[01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:49.000]  I don't care.
[01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:53.000]  All I need to do is make it look like there is.
[01:12:53.000 --> 01:13:00.000]  But in fact, if a public official is violating a law relating to his office
[01:13:00.000 --> 01:13:06.000]  or a ruling of the Supreme Court, they're screwed.
[01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:08.000]  Screws VUS.
[01:13:08.000 --> 01:13:15.000]  If a public official violates a ruling of this court and he be thane,
[01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:19.000]  he may not be heard to say he knows not what he does.
[01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:24.000]  And you and I may not be held to that highest standard.
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:29.000]  And this is what the case says, is that while a private citizen can't claim
[01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:33.000]  the ignorance of the law as a defense to prosecution,
[01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  the public official is held to a higher standard.
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  And that higher standard is not only knowledge of the law,
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:51.000]  but knowledge of the case law affecting the laws that they would purport to enforce.
[01:13:51.000 --> 01:13:54.000]  So they got to know it all.
[01:13:54.000 --> 01:13:59.000]  So what we want to do is create it.
[01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:04.000]  The point of that is we can always find plenty of crimes by these guys,
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:07.000]  even if they were acting in the best of faith
[01:14:07.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  and thought they were doing it correctly.
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:12.000]  They didn't do their homework.
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:15.000]  They didn't study the law relating to what they were doing.
[01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:17.000]  They did what they were trained to do
[01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  and accepted that what they were trained to do was correct and legal.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:27.000]  And then they find out it's not, and they railed in righteous indignation.
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:31.000]  Oh, poor me, poor me, well, tough.
[01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:36.000]  What I'm saying is, is poor Tony.
[01:14:36.000 --> 01:14:40.000]  Tony was subjected to a horrible situation.
[01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:47.000]  And she says, now, now I understand why you do what you do.
[01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:54.000]  To think that she could be treated so incredibly badly.
[01:14:54.000 --> 01:14:57.000]  This could have been over a traffic ticket.
[01:14:57.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  This could have been her daughter.
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:03.000]  Could have been one of my grandkids.
[01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:08.000]  So sometimes people need to get thumped a bit to figure it out.
[01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  And these public officials who are doing it,
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:14.000]  even if they're acting in the best of faith, tough.
[01:15:14.000 --> 01:15:18.000]  The police officer, when I ask him to take my criminal complaint,
[01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:23.000]  he thinks in all good faith that he has no duty to take the complaint.
[01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:25.000]  And then I land on him like a ton of bricks.
[01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:27.000]  Tough.
[01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:29.000]  You have no room for complaints.
[01:15:29.000 --> 01:15:34.000]  We want to put together a set of complaints
[01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  that point toward a knowing and deliberate criminal conspiracy
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:46.000]  to extort money from private citizens.
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:49.000]  Now we have a whole bunch of complaints we won't need to get to that place.
[01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:55.000]  So we're not going to claim everything we possibly can.
[01:15:55.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  We just set them up, give them opportunities.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:02.000]  We look at what we need.
[01:16:02.000 --> 01:16:08.000]  Like I need the city to try to hide information from me.
[01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:14.000]  So I'm going to ask them for information I know they're not going to want to give me
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  and do everything I can to get them not to give it to me so that I can sting them.
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  Once they've been stung by a private citizen this way,
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:28.000]  they're not ever going to want to go here again.
[01:16:28.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  And my whole show is about getting people to learn how to do this.
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:37.000]  Stop feeling mistreated. Stop feeling betrayed.
[01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:39.000]  Start feeling like the master.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  And we can work them over and get things changed.
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:47.000]  Take us out there.
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  Hi, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio with my guest, Randy Kelton.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  We'll be right back in just a moment.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:57.000]  Special, special talk.
[01:16:57.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  Special, yeah, real special. Special Ed.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:05.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:15.000]  We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:19.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular longevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polynburst.
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods,
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:46.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnet Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:54.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.000 --> 01:18:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:22.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:25.000]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:36.000]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor
[01:18:36.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:59.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  Order now.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:46.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:46.000 --> 01:19:49.000]  All right, Randy, what else do you have to say on this tonight?
[01:19:49.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  Well, that's about it. I want to kind of demonstrate how when you get in one of these situations
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:20:01.000]  and it appears as though they're treating you horribly, get over it.
[01:20:01.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  They're not treating you horribly. They're acting really, really stupid.
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:09.000]  And they are public servants.
[01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:16.000]  I recently told a judge who, in an eviction hearing,
[01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:22.000]  insisted that he said he was not going to let anybody come into his court and get a free house.
[01:20:22.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  And I said, Your Honor, it is my understanding that it is your duty to determine the facts
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:32.000]  in accordance with the rules of evidence to apply the law to the facts that comes to you in the case.
[01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:37.000]  If you have some other agenda, you need to get your behind down off that bench
[01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  and have you replaced with the fair and competent jurist I have a right to in the first instance.
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:49.000]  And he didn't threaten me with contempt to court.
[01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:53.000]  He apologized. He said, Mr. Kalkin, I did not mean it that way.
[01:20:53.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  Well, then, Your Honor, just how did you mean it?
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  And he went through some blah, blah, blah.
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:04.000]  But they forget who they are and they forget who we are.
[01:21:04.000 --> 01:21:08.000]  When you walk into the courtroom, when you walk into a courthouse,
[01:21:08.000 --> 01:21:12.000]  you are the baddest motor scooter in the building.
[01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:16.000]  And if we can get more people to understand that,
[01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:27.000]  you're not a police officer, a clerk, a judge, a prosecutor, a lawyer who's a judicial officer.
[01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:32.000]  They're all public officials. They're all public servants.
[01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:40.000]  You, you are the master and they are not to forget it.
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:47.000]  When you go into a traffic court, think in terms of setting them up.
[01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:52.000]  Tell them what you want them to do, but don't expect them to do what they're supposed to.
[01:21:52.000 --> 01:21:58.000]  Expect them to do the wrong thing out of hand at every turn.
[01:21:58.000 --> 01:22:03.000]  On my show, I say never ask a public official to do anything you actually want him to do
[01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:09.000]  because you never ask him to do anything that the law does not specifically require him to do
[01:22:09.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  and never give them legal advice.
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  Oh, these are my rights and you're supposed to do that.
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:22.000]  No, no, no, don't do that stuff. Bushwhack is a whole lot more fun.
[01:22:22.000 --> 01:22:24.000]  They don't do what they're supposed to.
[01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:27.000]  Call the bailiff over and ask him to arrest them.
[01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:32.000]  Look down 9-1-1 on them. That is so much fun.
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  Actually, I have to be careful because it's way too much fun.
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  They got my face smashed in the concrete in Tarrant County the third time I called 9-1-1
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:43.000]  on these sheriff's deputies.
[01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  And I shouldn't have told them this third guy you sent over here is the biggest moron yet.
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:51.000]  He was standing right in front of me.
[01:22:51.000 --> 01:22:55.000]  He dragged me out and threw me down, smashed my face in the concrete.
[01:22:55.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  Well, I just filed against them with the grand jury.
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:02.000]  They may all lose their jobs over that.
[01:23:02.000 --> 01:23:04.000]  They could actually go to jail over that one.
[01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:07.000]  So I don't suggest you push it that far.
[01:23:07.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  You don't need to lose teeth, break ribs, hard bones to get this done.
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  But when they realize that you are the master and they're subject to your authority,
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:21.000]  you change everything.
[01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:24.000]  And they are subject to your authority.
[01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:28.000]  You start filing criminal charges against them.
[01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:31.000]  And the people you file with are going to refuse to take the complaint.
[01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:34.000]  Oh, goody, goody, goody.
[01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  Now you get to file against the one you filed with.
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  And you start cranking this up.
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:42.000]  It's real easy.
[01:23:42.000 --> 01:23:45.000]  It's really straightforward.
[01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:47.000]  You ask a public official to do something.
[01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:49.000]  He fails to perform a duty he's required to perform.
[01:23:49.000 --> 01:23:52.000]  That's class A misdemeanor in Texas.
[01:23:52.000 --> 01:23:55.000]  Misfeasance in office.
[01:23:55.000 --> 01:23:59.000]  If he exerts an authority he doesn't expressly have and process denies you the right.
[01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:01.000]  That's malfeasance.
[01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:04.000]  It's also a class A misdemeanor.
[01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  Next thing to a felony, up to six months in jail, $10,000 fine.
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:13.000]  It's a big deal.
[01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:14.000]  You start filing these.
[01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  If we can get more people filing these, then this behavior will cease.
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:23.000]  And that's my story.
[01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:24.000]  I'm sticking to it.
[01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:29.000]  And I took a lot more of your show than I meant to.
[01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  But I did want to demonstrate what they did to this woman seemed really horrible on the surface.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:42.000]  But what they have done is created a monster for themselves.
[01:24:42.000 --> 01:24:46.000]  And now this monster is coming back at them.
[01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:49.000]  And there's not anything they can do to get rid of it.
[01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:52.000]  And they shouldn't be able to get rid of it.
[01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:56.000]  Exactly.
[01:24:56.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  Okay.
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:24:58.000]  That's my story.
[01:24:58.000 --> 01:24:59.000]  And I'm sticking to it.
[01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  All right, Randy.
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:03.000]  Well, I appreciate you coming on and letting us discuss all this this evening.
[01:25:03.000 --> 01:25:06.000]  And hopefully we'll get you back on again soon.
[01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:08.000]  Thank you for giving me time.
[01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  Okay.
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:10.000]  No problem.
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:11.000]  You have a good night.
[01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  Okay.
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:13.000]  Good night.
[01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  All right, folks.
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  The phones are now on.
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:17.000]  We got about a little under five minutes in this segment.
[01:25:17.000 --> 01:25:19.000]  So I'm going to start taking the calls I got.
[01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:22.000]  I'm going to call in 512-646-1984.
[01:25:22.000 --> 01:25:26.000]  I've got two more segments to go and I'll get to as many people as I can.
[01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  All right.
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:30.000]  Scott in Texas, what do you got?
[01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  All right.
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:35.000]  I just want to say I appreciate everything you guys are doing.
[01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:37.000]  And I'm Scott in Dallas.
[01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  You know me.
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:39.000]  I come to your classes.
[01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:40.000]  Yeah.
[01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:42.000]  And I got a couple of things.
[01:25:42.000 --> 01:25:45.000]  I got two cases that I'm going.
[01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:48.000]  One is the one that you obviously know about.
[01:25:48.000 --> 01:25:50.000]  And I submitted all the motions.
[01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:54.000]  And just to kind of give you an update on it, I submitted all the motions.
[01:25:54.000 --> 01:26:00.000]  And the judge wrote me and wanted me to print out all the case laws.
[01:26:00.000 --> 01:26:05.000]  So 998 pages later, I submitted it, went to the motions trial.
[01:26:05.000 --> 01:26:07.000]  They postponed it till December.
[01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:14.000]  So everybody out there that's listening, you all should get Eddie's material because it seems to confound them.
[01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:16.000]  Because here's another one.
[01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:19.000]  I got pulled over in Rockwall a while back.
[01:26:19.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  It was about a month after my mashing of the window.
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  And I didn't go through all the big dilemmas, you know, this time.
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:30.000]  And so I wound up, you know, didn't go to jail or nothing.
[01:26:30.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  And beginning out, I got a ticket for my invalid license.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  So I submitted all the motions and everything and went to the judge the first time.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:43.000]  And I said, I'm here in special appearance.
[01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:49.000]  And she just kind of wrote to me because I didn't sign for not guilty or anything.
[01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:54.000]  That's what I can't consciously, you know, fill that out, you know.
[01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  And so she said, oh, I can do it for you.
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:58.000]  And I was like, okay.
[01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:02.000]  And so anyhow, I stayed up for the motions trial.
[01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  And so I went last time to go to the pre-motions trial.
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:13.000]  And the city attorney, he got the stuff.
[01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  Well, he'd never seen it, I guess, because he looked really surprised.
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:19.000]  And these are the kind of questions I wanted to get to.
[01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:24.000]  When he saw that I was there in special appearance, he kind of like, he goes,
[01:27:24.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  you're here in special appearance?
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:29.000]  And I just sat there, I wouldn't say nothing.
[01:27:29.000 --> 01:27:33.000]  And then he goes, oh, you don't think this court has jurisdiction?
[01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:35.000]  And I just kind of sat there and he just kind of looked at me and he goes,
[01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:37.000]  sir, you don't think this court has jurisdiction?
[01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  And I said, no, I'm not engaged in commercial transportation.
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:44.000]  And he said, okay, well, let's just go see the judge.
[01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  And so we went up to go see the judge.
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:49.000]  And there's a female judge.
[01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:55.000]  And she was in, and he said, judge, there's nothing I can do with this person.
[01:27:55.000 --> 01:27:57.000]  He's here in special appearance.
[01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  And he challenges jurisdiction.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:02.000]  And there's nothing I can do with it.
[01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  And so she was just like, okay, well, I can go ahead and set this for trial.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:12.000]  And she was ready to set it for trial.
[01:28:12.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  And he goes, well, maybe I need to set it for an emotional trial first.
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:20.000]  She was already trying to set it for trial and emotional trial at the same time.
[01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:23.000]  And I was like, well, judge, the whole purpose of the emotional trial is to receive
[01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:25.000]  and even go that far for trial.
[01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:26.000]  Yeah.
[01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:33.000]  Well, the problem is she's scheduling trials and hearings without any evidence
[01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  of jurisdiction being brought to the record for anybody.
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:39.000]  See, that's the problem, folks.
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  Just because they continue on, that does not establish that they ever had
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:48.000]  jurisdiction of the case.
[01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:54.000]  You need to be objecting when they attempt to move forward after you have
[01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  demanded proof of jurisdiction, which is what the challenge to jurisdiction
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  motion does.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  And the court cannot establish jurisdiction on their own.
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:14.000]  The moving party must show how the court acquired jurisdiction and why it has it.
[01:29:14.000 --> 01:29:16.000]  That would be the prosecutor.
[01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:23.000]  If the court is attempting to do it themselves, they are in violation of a fair
[01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:29.000]  and impartial trial because they are invoking a jurisdiction that they cannot
[01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:32.000]  produce evidence of.
[01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  You follow?
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:36.000]  You need to be objecting when they do that.
[01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:37.000]  All right, Scott, hang on.
[01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  We'll pick you up on the other side of this break.
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  We'll get in line and I'll try to get to as many people as possible before I get
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  off here in the next couple of segments.
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:04.000]  Is that a Harley I hear?
[01:30:04.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  If so, I hope the driver is wearing a helmet.
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:11.000]  Motorcycle fatalities are way up and you won't guess among which age group.
[01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:17.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:20.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:20.000 --> 01:30:25.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:30.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:30.000 --> 01:30:33.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:40.000]  search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:44.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:48.000]  When you hear the word motorcycle, most of us think of youthful rebellion.
[01:30:48.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  You know, some teenage couple zipping down the highway with the wind whipping
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:53.000]  through their hair.
[01:30:53.000 --> 01:30:57.000]  What you do picture is the driver on that Harley being a middle-aged baby boomer
[01:30:57.000 --> 01:30:59.000]  or even a retiree.
[01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:03.000]  Fact is, though, older people are riding motorcycles more than ever and dying in
[01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  greater numbers too.
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  Federal accident data shows motorcycle deaths have climbed 25 percent in 10 years.
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:15.000]  Half the riders were age 40 or older, and nearly a quarter were older than 50.
[01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  So if you're planning on hitting the highway, wear a helmet and go easy on those
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:21.000]  hairpin turns.
[01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:22.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:30.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:35.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of
[01:31:35.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  September 11.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  demolition.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:03.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:09.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails.
[01:32:09.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  But good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:13.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails.
[01:32:13.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  But I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:17.000]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can
[01:32:17.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:24.000]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business
[01:32:24.000 --> 01:32:26.000]  Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:30.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and
[01:32:30.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:42.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to
[01:32:42.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:12.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:12.000 --> 01:33:40.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:40.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking to Scott in Texas.
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:45.000]  All right, Scott, please continue.
[01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:46.000]  Okay.
[01:33:46.000 --> 01:33:50.000]  I want to try to get to quite a few things real quick here.
[01:33:50.000 --> 01:33:56.000]  So when I submitted, when that city attorney read that special app or special
[01:33:56.000 --> 01:34:01.000]  appearance thing, and he kind of freaked out over what is this so significant
[01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  about that, the warning?
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:07.000]  Well, I don't know which party reacted to it.
[01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:10.000]  He just read the special appearance.
[01:34:10.000 --> 01:34:12.000]  He goes, oh, you're hearing special appearance.
[01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:17.000]  Well, the reason they like to state that special appearance has no place in a
[01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:19.000]  criminal case only in civil.
[01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:24.000]  In other words, we presume we always have jurisdiction in a criminal case.
[01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:26.000]  That's not true.
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:31.000]  You have the right to challenge jurisdiction, whether it be civil or criminal.
[01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  These lower courts absolutely in most places refuse to recognize that right,
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:42.000]  which is one of the things that continues to deprive them of jurisdiction
[01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:46.000]  because they are denying you and your right to challenge it.
[01:34:46.000 --> 01:34:47.000]  Okay.
[01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:48.000]  Okay.
[01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:57.000]  And then I got the motions trial this Wednesday, and so you said I should try
[01:34:57.000 --> 01:34:59.000]  to read the motions.
[01:34:59.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  You stick until they put on the record evidence of jurisdiction.
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:09.000]  You keep challenging their authority to go beyond the special appearance
[01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:12.000]  motion.
[01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:13.000]  Okay.
[01:35:13.000 --> 01:35:16.000]  Judge, everything in this deals with a challenge to your jurisdiction,
[01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:22.000]  everything, unless the prosecutor submits evidence to this court showing how
[01:35:22.000 --> 01:35:28.000]  this court obtained subject matter and personal jurisdiction over me as
[01:35:28.000 --> 01:35:34.000]  relating to the regulated activity of transportation, then you don't have any
[01:35:34.000 --> 01:35:43.000]  ability to hear anything other than a motion to dismiss, which is what this is.
[01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  Okay.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  So challenge subject matter jurisdiction and just...
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  The rule is thus, challenge jurisdiction once.
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:56.000]  Twice and always.
[01:35:56.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  Yeah, exactly.
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  I come to your classes when I can.
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:08.000]  It's actually challenge it first, last, and always, but...
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  Okay.
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:14.000]  But yeah, I'm just kind of wondering.
[01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:18.000]  I mean, there are always kind of railroads in there, and so I mean, I was just
[01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:22.000]  going to say, you know, I was probably going to fly off the handle and say, you
[01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:29.000]  know, the duty of officer, he has no facts or evidence to even show that, you
[01:36:29.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  know, that they have evidence that I was engaged in commercial
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:35.000]  transportation, but I don't even need to go that far.
[01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:38.000]  No, no, you don't.
[01:36:38.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  They bear the burden of proof, beginning with establishing proper
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:52.000]  jurisdiction, and jurisdiction has seven total parts, but three major component
[01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:57.000]  parts upon which the others are divided into, and they are subject matter,
[01:36:57.000 --> 01:37:00.000]  personal, and venue.
[01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:02.000]  Okay?
[01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  They have to have all three of those, or they have none of those.
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:14.000]  Subject matter, personal, and venue.
[01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:17.000]  So what does that really mean, though?
[01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:22.000]  It means that the court must be specifically authorized by law to preside
[01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:29.000]  over the type of matter related to the charge, that they must have personal
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:32.000]  jurisdiction over the person being charged.
[01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:36.000]  In other words, they wouldn't have jurisdiction over a person in Ohio charged
[01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:38.000]  with an Ohio statute, would they?
[01:37:38.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  No.
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  Okay.
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:44.000]  They wouldn't have power over a foreign diplomat charged with a local law,
[01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:46.000]  would they?
[01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:47.000]  Negative.
[01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:48.000]  Okay.
[01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:52.000]  They wouldn't have personal jurisdiction over a person who could not possibly
[01:37:52.000 --> 01:37:57.000]  be engaging in the activity if they have no evidence of engaging in the
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:37:59.000]  activity, can they?
[01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:00.000]  No, sir.
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:01.000]  There you go.
[01:38:01.000 --> 01:38:03.000]  Then you have venue.
[01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:08.000]  They have to have jurisdiction over the location where it occurred.
[01:38:08.000 --> 01:38:15.000]  Venue, however, is the only one that can be changed, and personal and venue
[01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:23.000]  are the only ones that can be waived.
[01:38:23.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  Okay.
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  So my whole thing is just to go in there and just stand on that you never have
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:36.000]  jurisdiction over the whole thing, and just stand on that and not say anything
[01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:37.000]  else?
[01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:39.000]  Let's not not say anything else.
[01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  I will.
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  Okay.
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:42.000]  Okay.
[01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  You don't turn into a tree stump.
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:49.000]  What have we done in class?
[01:38:49.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  How do you do things in court when they're using the deadly sins and you're
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:56.000]  standing on a not in transportation defense?
[01:38:56.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  I can't.
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:38:58.000]  Exactly.
[01:38:58.000 --> 01:39:01.000]  Does that mean sit there and say nothing?
[01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:02.000]  No, sir.
[01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  Correct.
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  Okay.
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:14.000]  What you do not do is say anything relating specifically to merits, nothing
[01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:17.000]  that deals with the actual charge.
[01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:22.000]  Everything you say or do relates to providing evidence.
[01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  You were engaged in the regulated activity, because if you weren't, none of
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:29.000]  the rest of it applies.
[01:39:29.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  I agree.
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  Okay.
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:36.000]  Well, I feel better.
[01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  I'm glad I got to talk to you tonight, because I was going to come down, but I
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:43.000]  couldn't make it down this weekend.
[01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:47.000]  So I was like, well, hopefully I'll talk to you on the phone.
[01:39:47.000 --> 01:39:51.000]  I hope Randy goes after them and kills them.
[01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:52.000]  It will just be awesome.
[01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:57.000]  So everybody just needs to stand up, start taking their stuff to court, and find
[01:39:57.000 --> 01:39:59.000]  them tooth and nail all the way.
[01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:02.000]  So I'm telling everybody I know.
[01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  And they're starting to take a little bit of action now.
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  And I appreciate all your help.
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:12.000]  And I just want to let you get to some other callers, because I know everybody.
[01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  You need to be on every night.
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:18.000]  So thank you for your help, sir, and have a good evening.
[01:40:18.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  You're welcome, Scott.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:20.000]  You have a good week.
[01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:21.000]  Okay.
[01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:22.000]  Bye.
[01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:23.000]  Bye.
[01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:24.000]  All right.
[01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  Now we're going to go to Lee in California.
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:27.000]  Lee, what can we do for you?
[01:40:27.000 --> 01:40:29.000]  How are you doing, Eddie?
[01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  Doing all right.
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:33.000]  Scott, you've got about three minutes, and then you're going to have to stop.
[01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:36.000]  So whatever you can get, let's go.
[01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:37.000]  Okay.
[01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:42.000]  Well, I emailed you a couple of days ago about an incident that happened with my
[01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  daughter in school in regards to an illegal search that they're doing in schools for
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  weapons, but it seems that they were going in their bags also and going in their
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  pocket to check to see if they have any illegal narcotics.
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:08.000]  Now, I'm going to file a criminal complaint against the school because of the fact that
[01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:14.000]  the day that it happened, I called the principal, and I told him how he violated a
[01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:18.000]  right on the search, of an illegal search.
[01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:25.000]  And he said that the superintendent was the one who administered the paperwork.
[01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:31.000]  So I had a meeting with the superintendent and the principal and some other workers
[01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:37.000]  that worked there, and they told me that there's this policy, educational policy,
[01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  where they disregarded the penal code of me saying that they're in violation.
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:50.000]  The only way you're going to get their attention is to sue them and press criminal
[01:41:50.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  charges against them, but you're going to have to find somebody to help you sue them
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:42:01.000]  under Title 42 because they can't just randomly stop somebody and search them.
[01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:06.000]  Even on school property, they can't do that.
[01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:08.000]  Okay.
[01:42:08.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  So do I file the criminal complaints with D.A. myself and then go look for a lawyer
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:18.000]  for a lawsuit?
[01:42:18.000 --> 01:42:23.000]  A lawyer's probably not going to do anything as far as criminal complaint.
[01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:24.000]  Okay.
[01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:29.000]  So in that aspect, I followed with the D.A., and do I have to have my daughter
[01:42:29.000 --> 01:42:31.000]  make an affidavit?
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:33.000]  How old is your daughter?
[01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:36.000]  She's 16.
[01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:39.000]  What's the age of adulthood in your state?
[01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:41.000]  California, 18.
[01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  Okay.
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:52.000]  Then she's not competent to make an affidavit of her own now, at least not in front of you.
[01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  She could make a sworn statement in front of a prosecutor or someone like that,
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:06.000]  but you could be her representative in every other way because she's a minor.
[01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:09.000]  Okay.
[01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:15.000]  So you can be the one that signs the affidavit and everything, making the allegations
[01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:18.000]  that she stated this because she's going to be available to be questioned about
[01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:22.000]  what's in the affidavit.
[01:43:22.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  Okay.
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  Well, see, the thing about it is they've given you information directly that would allow you
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:42.000]  to make the affidavit yourself because they sent you the letter telling you what they did.
[01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  Right?
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  Correct.
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:46.000]  Okay.
[01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:50.000]  So you can make an affidavit yourself as far as what they told you they did do,
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:55.000]  and your daughter would have to make one as what she experienced when they did it.
[01:43:55.000 --> 01:43:56.000]  Hang on just a second.
[01:43:56.000 --> 01:43:57.000]  We're about to take a break.
[01:43:57.000 --> 01:43:58.000]  All right, folks.
[01:43:58.000 --> 01:43:59.000]  Y'all hold on.
[01:43:59.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Sorry.
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  What?
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:14.000]  Hi.
[01:44:14.000 --> 01:44:15.000]  My name is Steve Holt.
[01:44:15.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  And like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:22.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease
[01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:29.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity.
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  But there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:39.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading
[01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:46.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity,
[01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:50.000]  then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.000 --> 01:44:54.000]  or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:54.000 --> 01:44:56.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products
[01:44:56.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:00.000]  and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:11.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[01:45:11.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:31.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:31.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:47.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:47.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  Our call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:01.000 --> 01:46:21.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:21.000 --> 01:46:25.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking to Lee in California.
[01:46:25.000 --> 01:46:28.000]  All right, Lee, as far as what they're trying to do,
[01:46:28.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  I finally found the email you sent me.
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:33.000]  It says you sent it to me 13 hours ago.
[01:46:33.000 --> 01:46:36.000]  The other one was 12 days ago, and I responded to that one.
[01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:40.000]  But in any case, when they go to the mother asking if you have custody,
[01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:43.000]  they're trying to find some way, since you're the only one that complained
[01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:48.000]  about the search, you're the only threat they see, not the mother.
[01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:51.000]  So they're trying to determine whether or not you have joint custody
[01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:54.000]  or any legal custody to be there on your daughter's behalf
[01:46:54.000 --> 01:46:57.000]  so that they don't have to face the music for what they did
[01:46:57.000 --> 01:47:00.000]  if the mother's not willing to push it, but you are.
[01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:04.000]  They're trying to find some way to negate you, okay?
[01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  Now as to your other questions, the DA will play no role in this
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:12.000]  outside of prosecuting somebody for an actual crime,
[01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:17.000]  which he would have to accept and prosecute by taking a criminal complaint
[01:47:17.000 --> 01:47:20.000]  from you or someone else like your daughter,
[01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:23.000]  which I wouldn't hold my breath for.
[01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:26.000]  What you need to do is find a civil rights attorney,
[01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:28.000]  though that's not what you actually have,
[01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:32.000]  it's what they call them for their court purposes,
[01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:35.000]  and you need to file a Title 42 lawsuit,
[01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:41.000]  violation of rights under color of law, illegal search and seizure, okay?
[01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:47.000]  Even if they took nothing, the stop and the search was illegal.
[01:47:47.000 --> 01:47:50.000]  It was unconstitutional on its face.
[01:47:50.000 --> 01:47:55.000]  There was no suspicion of a crime, and the letter you receive states that.
[01:47:55.000 --> 01:48:02.000]  When it says she was chosen at random,
[01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:13.000]  that is clear intent to randomly violate the rights of the student population.
[01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:14.000]  I see, okay.
[01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:18.000]  Okay, so you need to find an attorney that will understand that
[01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:21.000]  and help you get it heard in court.
[01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:25.000]  What you want is punitive damages, money damages,
[01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:30.000]  and an injunction barring them from ever doing it again.
[01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:31.000]  Correct.
[01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:32.000]  Exactly.
[01:48:32.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  The last part was the main part because I don't want all these kids to be thinking
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  that they're going to school.
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:40.000]  Well, what you need to do is you need to take that letter,
[01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:45.000]  and you need to find out if any other parents do a Freedom of Information request
[01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:50.000]  to the school asking for a list of students and their parents
[01:48:50.000 --> 01:48:55.000]  who were also subjected to this type of random search.
[01:48:55.000 --> 01:49:01.000]  You need to get together with these parents and these students and start a group,
[01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:06.000]  hold meetings, and decide together to go in to hire an attorney
[01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:08.000]  to make a class action out of it.
[01:49:08.000 --> 01:49:15.000]  Then they will be really up crap creek.
[01:49:15.000 --> 01:49:16.000]  Okay.
[01:49:16.000 --> 01:49:21.000]  So the criminal complaints basically, I mean, just don't go forward with it anyways?
[01:49:21.000 --> 01:49:24.000]  No, you can do the criminal complaints, but once you file them,
[01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:32.000]  it's out of your hands as to what happens to them.
[01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:38.000]  But the lawsuit, that's another animal.
[01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:41.000]  Okay, I can do both, right?
[01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:43.000]  Yes, you can do both.
[01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:47.000]  But I was saying about an attorney not wanting to have anything to do with it,
[01:49:47.000 --> 01:49:53.000]  do not tell the attorney that you go talk to that you filed criminal complaints.
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:56.000]  You can ask him if he's willing to assist you in doing so,
[01:49:56.000 --> 01:50:00.000]  but I doubt if he's going to give you a positive response to that.
[01:50:00.000 --> 01:50:05.000]  And if you tell him you've already done so, he will turn you down right off the bat
[01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:09.000]  because he does not want to have to go head-to-head with trying to accomplish something
[01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  not only against the school, but against the county prosecutor at the same time
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  for not doing his job.
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:19.000]  Gotcha, yeah.
[01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:24.000]  I got those forms in order to file against the DA if he doesn't follow through with it.
[01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:26.000]  Yeah.
[01:50:26.000 --> 01:50:30.000]  Do I apply the educational code with the complaint also
[01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:36.000]  because she needs to have a notice to be sworn in on the road?
[01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:41.000]  You still do a Public Information Act request for all of those records
[01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  from whoever is the custodian of records for the school.
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:47.000]  It doesn't matter whether she remembers it or not.
[01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:53.000]  You go to the person who is responsible for maintaining the records where it is supposed to be
[01:50:53.000 --> 01:50:55.000]  and tell them to provide you with it.
[01:50:55.000 --> 01:51:01.000]  That's what a public information request is for.
[01:51:01.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  Okay, and that can be handled on that same day if I give it to him?
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:08.000]  I do not know what the public information laws in California are.
[01:51:08.000 --> 01:51:10.000]  You're going to have to read those and find out.
[01:51:10.000 --> 01:51:15.000]  Here in Texas, they have up to 10 days to respond.
[01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:16.000]  All right, and then one more thing.
[01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:19.000]  So after I get all the information, go ahead and go forward with the complaint
[01:51:19.000 --> 01:51:22.000]  or start with the complaint first?
[01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:24.000]  The criminal complaints you can do right away.
[01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:27.000]  You don't need any of this to file the criminal complaint.
[01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  None of this has anything at all to do with the criminal complaint.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:36.000]  Okay, what you will want to do is make a certified copy of that letter.
[01:51:36.000 --> 01:51:38.000]  Take it to a notary.
[01:51:38.000 --> 01:51:40.000]  Have the notary copy it.
[01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:45.000]  Have the notary stamp it as a copy of the letter brought to her
[01:51:45.000 --> 01:51:50.000]  and that the letter brought to her was an original to the best of her knowledge.
[01:51:50.000 --> 01:51:55.000]  Okay, and then you give that certified copy to the prosecuting attorney
[01:51:55.000 --> 01:51:59.000]  with your criminal complaint.
[01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:02.000]  Got you.
[01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:03.000]  Very well.
[01:52:03.000 --> 01:52:04.000]  Thanks a lot, Eddie.
[01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:05.000]  I appreciate it.
[01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:06.000]  You're welcome.
[01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:07.000]  Good luck.
[01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:08.000]  You know, you're doing good work.
[01:52:08.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  Thank you.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:12.000]  Well, I hope it turns out to be fruitful for some.
[01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:15.000]  All right, now we've got Kev in Michigan.
[01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:20.000]  Kev, we've got six and a half minutes, and I've got a couple of other callers besides you.
[01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  What can I do for you?
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:24.000]  Yeah, we're fine, Eddie.
[01:52:24.000 --> 01:52:31.000]  I'm glad your communication policy isn't like your monetary policy.
[01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:38.000]  I try to send you money sometimes, man, and you're like, I don't deal with Bitcoin, but that's another story.
[01:52:38.000 --> 01:52:43.000]  Yeah, well, I'm not big on replacing one fiat currency with another,
[01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:47.000]  especially one that I can't get to if the electricity goes out.
[01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:54.000]  Yeah, but I wanted to really tell you that there is another project out there
[01:52:54.000 --> 01:52:59.000]  that the same thing that you're talking about building that's already built,
[01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:07.000]  you just got to basically get into the platform, almost like a Facebook platform
[01:53:07.000 --> 01:53:11.000]  where people pay for your content, just like your classes right there.
[01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:15.000]  If you do your classes, people can access your classes online.
[01:53:15.000 --> 01:53:19.000]  Well, if you'll send me a link, I'll look into it and see what it is.
[01:53:19.000 --> 01:53:29.000]  Yeah, yeah, I'm definitely going to do that because I see you as like my father who says,
[01:53:29.000 --> 01:53:31.000]  yeah, I don't really like the Internet.
[01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:35.000]  The Internet is too much bull junk on the Internet.
[01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:38.000]  But I'm like, that's just like the Gutenberg press.
[01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:43.000]  Some people don't really understand the technology when it's there,
[01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:50.000]  but at the same time, you got to look at it, Eddie, because I wouldn't say it's fiat,
[01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:52.000]  but I'm not going to pump it.
[01:53:52.000 --> 01:53:55.000]  Well, it's not that I don't understand the technology or anything like that.
[01:53:55.000 --> 01:53:58.000]  I've looked into it. I've studied it intently.
[01:53:58.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  What gold and silver backs it?
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:04.000]  No, nothing backs it.
[01:54:04.000 --> 01:54:09.000]  Exactly. That is exactly why it's a fiat currency.
[01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:15.000]  Yeah, but I can't make that code, replace that code and place it into the ecosystem.
[01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:21.000]  So, you know, if I can't duplicate that code, then it's not something that's fiat.
[01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  If I can't duplicate it on my own volition and put it into the ecosystem and send it, then, you know...
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:31.000]  But that's exactly how you get Bitcoin.
[01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:37.000]  Someone either provides you with it or you manufacture it yourself through Number Crunchy, correct?
[01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:38.000]  Yeah, yeah, yeah.
[01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:43.000]  And supposedly it's got a finite number in the cryptogram that it can reach, right?
[01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:44.000]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:49.000]  And, of course, it wasn't publicly released until the gentleman that produced the algorithm
[01:54:49.000 --> 01:54:56.000]  had already accumulated millions of them in the low, easy-to-get-to prime number realm, right?
[01:54:56.000 --> 01:55:00.000]  Yeah, that's good. I wish I could have got in when I got the opportunity.
[01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:04.000]  Well, but that's just it. They weren't going to let you in until they had the numbers generated.
[01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  They got millions for themselves before they ever publicly released it out there for the rest of you.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:14.000]  But then look at how many competing types of coinage they've created that way.
[01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:19.000]  There's more than one type of Bitcoin going on, and that's exactly my point.
[01:55:19.000 --> 01:55:25.000]  If you run out of numbers on Bitcoin, switch to leech coin, switch to dip crap coin, you know?
[01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:36.000]  But, Eddie, if it all hit the fan, man, you may have to use a Bitcoin to transfer your gold and silver to get outside the coin.
[01:55:36.000 --> 01:55:40.000]  How are you going to do that without a computer and electricity and without an internet to hook it to?
[01:55:40.000 --> 01:55:44.000]  How are you going to put it in your pocket and take it anywhere?
[01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:48.000]  I doubt if it'll be that bad, Eddie. I don't think it'll be that bad.
[01:55:48.000 --> 01:55:52.000]  I think it's always going to be on a place on the map with electricity.
[01:55:52.000 --> 01:55:56.000]  Yeah, but is it going to be connected to you?
[01:55:56.000 --> 01:55:58.000]  Yeah, but you can always get access.
[01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:01.000]  Look, Kev, I know you're a smart gentleman.
[01:56:01.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  Now, you've heard of things like the Watts Riots and so on and so forth.
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:10.000]  And you know what started the Watts Riots?
[01:56:10.000 --> 01:56:11.000]  What's that?
[01:56:11.000 --> 01:56:13.000]  It was two arrests.
[01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:21.000]  An arrest of two black men in downtown Watts by the Los Angeles Police Department started the Watts Riots.
[01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:25.000]  They burned down half of that part of the city.
[01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:26.000]  Okay?
[01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:27.000]  Yeah.
[01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:29.000]  And that was just over an arrest.
[01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:38.000]  What are they going to do when there's no one getting paid to ship in and truck in and train in food, water, to run the utility companies?
[01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:43.000]  Even if they're up and running, who's paying them to stand there and make them work?
[01:56:43.000 --> 01:56:44.000]  Nobody.
[01:56:44.000 --> 01:56:45.000]  Yeah, you're right.
[01:56:45.000 --> 01:56:46.000]  Okay.
[01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:52.000]  But you know, I don't see it. I can see where you're coming from, but I think you just got to diversify.
[01:56:52.000 --> 01:56:57.000]  I am one of those people that I always prefer to hedge my bets.
[01:56:57.000 --> 01:57:05.000]  So here's what I'm looking at to invest in for precious metals, gold, silver, brass, lead.
[01:57:05.000 --> 01:57:08.000]  Those are my precious metals.
[01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:14.000]  I can spend and trade the first two, and I can defend the first two with the second two.
[01:57:14.000 --> 01:57:17.000]  Yeah, you're right. You're right. You're right.
[01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:22.000]  So yeah, Eddie, what I was going to ask you, man, we've got all the way off topic.
[01:57:22.000 --> 01:57:23.000]  Sorry, go ahead.
[01:57:23.000 --> 01:57:25.000]  A few weeks from now.
[01:57:25.000 --> 01:57:27.000]  A few weeks from now.
[01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:37.000]  But this judge, I want to know if I can, if he were to move forward, because I got a public defender he assigned me.
[01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:42.000]  I want to know if I can file a criminal complaint on him, but not let my public defender.
[01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:46.000]  The public defender or the judge?
[01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:47.000]  The judge.
[01:57:47.000 --> 01:57:52.000]  Sure. You can file a criminal complaint against anybody if you have grounds.
[01:57:52.000 --> 01:58:00.000]  Yeah, because they sent the default judgment again before they even gave me a review, a judicial review.
[01:58:00.000 --> 01:58:04.000]  But that's neither here nor there. I can get a call back, Eddie.
[01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:10.000]  All right. Well, do send me an email to that site you're talking about as far as being able to do the classes and stuff like that.
[01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  I'm going to take a look at it and we'll see if it'll stack up to what we're trying to build.
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  It may give me a tool, but I don't know if it'll have everything we're looking at implementing when we get this done.
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:24.000]  But I do appreciate the call, Kev, any information, okay?
[01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:25.000]  All right.
[01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  All right. Thanks for calling in.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  All right. I am sorry, my remaining callers, I have, I'm out of time.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  Sorry, Randy and I spent a lot of time trying to get some information out there tonight that we hope you all found useful.
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:42.000]  I hope that everybody has a blessed week. Thank you all for listening. Thank you all for contributing.
[01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:48.000]  And please finance the lawsuit when and how you can through donations, because that's going to cost money too.
[01:58:48.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Y'all have a great week, folks.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.000 --> 02:00:11.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it. Logosradionetwork.com.