ROL_2015-06-12_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily
[00:06.000 --> 00:08.000]  bulletins for the commodity market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.000 --> 00:28.000]  Markets for the 11th of June, 2015 opened up with gold at $1,181.10 an ounce, silver
[00:28.000 --> 00:34.000]  at $16 an ounce, Texas crude at $61.43 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about
[00:34.000 --> 00:42.000]  $229 U.S. currency.
[00:42.000 --> 00:48.000]  Today in history, Monday, June 11, 2001, Timothy McVeigh is executed by lethal injection for
[00:48.000 --> 00:58.000]  his role in the Oklahoma City bombing of April 19, 1995.
[00:58.000 --> 01:03.000]  In recent news, Ali Amin, a 17-year-old from Manassas, Virginia, pleaded guilty in court
[01:03.000 --> 01:05.000]  today to charges of conspiring to help ISIS.
[01:05.000 --> 01:09.000]  Apparently, he used his Twitter account and blog to provide instructions on how to send
[01:09.000 --> 01:11.000]  Bitcoin to the Islamic State.
[01:11.000 --> 01:14.000]  He also helped Reza Nijad to travel to Syria to join them.
[01:14.000 --> 01:19.000]  This is the first time the United States has prosecuted a minor as an adult in such a case.
[01:19.000 --> 01:26.000]  He faces up to 15 years in prison when sentenced on August 28.
[01:26.000 --> 01:30.000]  The American Civil Liberties Union, representing Gavin Graham, has filed complaints against
[01:30.000 --> 01:33.000]  Gloucester County School Board in Richmond, Virginia.
[01:33.000 --> 01:38.000]  The complaint states that Graham, 16, was designated female at birth but has a male
[01:38.000 --> 01:39.000]  gender identity.
[01:39.000 --> 01:43.000]  He has been diagnosed as having gender dysphoria, a medical condition characterized by distress
[01:43.000 --> 01:47.000]  stemming from conflict between a person's gender identity and the person's assigned
[01:47.000 --> 01:48.000]  sex at birth.
[01:48.000 --> 01:52.000]  Apparently, he had used the communal restrooms without incident until the board responding
[01:52.000 --> 01:56.000]  to complaints from local residents adopted a policy in December requiring transgender
[01:56.000 --> 01:58.000]  students to use a private facility.
[01:58.000 --> 02:05.000]  The ACLU is suing to get him to be able to use them.
[02:05.000 --> 02:09.000]  The Lightsail spacecraft, a privately funded space project by members of the Planetary
[02:09.000 --> 02:15.000]  Society, demonstrated how a tiny motor could unfurl four thin Mylar films into an area
[02:15.000 --> 02:16.000]  as big as a living room.
[02:16.000 --> 02:17.000]  What for, you ask?
[02:17.000 --> 02:22.000]  It is to practice a space propulsion technique known as solar sailing.
[02:22.000 --> 02:26.000]  The basic idea is to use the pressure of photons from the sun against a film to generate forward
[02:26.000 --> 02:27.000]  momentum.
[02:27.000 --> 02:31.000]  Confirmation via a Lightsail selfie finally came in on Tuesday.
[02:31.000 --> 02:35.000]  Pontic managers are trying to run other tests to put the spacecraft through before it succumbs
[02:35.000 --> 02:45.000]  to Earth's gravity and is pulled back into the atmosphere sometime this weekend.
[02:45.000 --> 02:47.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors.
[02:47.000 --> 02:51.000]  If you have a product or a service you'd like to advertise in the Lowdown, feel free to
[02:51.000 --> 02:54.000]  give us a call at 210-863-5617.
[02:54.000 --> 03:19.000]  This has been your Lowdown for June 11, 2015.
[03:19.000 --> 03:39.000]  Thanks for watching.
[03:49.000 --> 04:16.000]  We'll see you next time.
[04:19.000 --> 04:24.000]  I'm kind of counting on Jeff Sedgwick to give us a call.
[04:24.000 --> 04:27.000]  If you're out there listening old timer, give us a call earlier.
[04:27.000 --> 04:32.000]  I've been trying to struggle through a couple documents you sent me and they've given me
[04:32.000 --> 04:34.000]  a headache.
[04:34.000 --> 04:37.000]  But until we get to that, don't wait for Jeff.
[04:37.000 --> 04:40.000]  If you have a question or comment, give us a call.
[04:40.000 --> 04:46.000]  I'm going to start talking about something that has nothing to do with what we normally
[04:46.000 --> 04:49.000]  come here for.
[04:49.000 --> 04:58.000]  Most of those of you who listen a lot know that I am basically trained as an engineer.
[04:58.000 --> 05:05.000]  And engineers, they figure stuff out and they invent stuff.
[05:05.000 --> 05:11.000]  Well, I've spoken to this a time or two.
[05:11.000 --> 05:14.000]  I do pressure point therapy.
[05:14.000 --> 05:25.000]  I have for a long time paid close attention to how this carcass that I'm living in is
[05:25.000 --> 05:27.000]  aging.
[05:27.000 --> 05:35.000]  And it's important for all of us to do that at this time in history because those of us
[05:35.000 --> 05:46.000]  who are alive today based on the current and emerging technology could well live out this
[05:46.000 --> 05:48.000]  current millennium.
[05:48.000 --> 05:55.000]  So this physical carcass that we're inside is something we need to play real close attention
[05:55.000 --> 05:58.000]  to and take care of.
[05:58.000 --> 06:01.000]  If you're smoking, cut it out.
[06:01.000 --> 06:07.000]  I was looking at some statistics recently and they had a graph showing the number of
[06:07.000 --> 06:09.000]  people who died of heart attack.
[06:09.000 --> 06:17.000]  And I think it started with heart attack and then cancer and various different things and
[06:17.000 --> 06:19.000]  auto accidents.
[06:19.000 --> 06:21.000]  And then it got to smoking.
[06:21.000 --> 06:38.000]  Okay.
[06:38.000 --> 06:39.000]  I am confused.
[06:39.000 --> 06:42.000]  I don't know if I'm on the air or not.
[06:42.000 --> 06:44.000]  We're having a little problem with our producer today.
[06:44.000 --> 06:51.000]  He's having a little trouble getting in on his X-Lite machine to produce the show.
[06:51.000 --> 06:56.000]  So I may be talking to air while I was talking to you.
[06:56.000 --> 07:02.000]  When we go off the air, we get a loud beep in our headset.
[07:02.000 --> 07:06.000]  And while I was talking to you, I got this loud beep in my headset.
[07:06.000 --> 07:13.000]  So at the moment, I don't know if I'm actually talking to you or not.
[07:13.000 --> 07:22.000]  I'm going to pretend as though I am so I won't be concerned as to whether we are on the
[07:22.000 --> 07:23.000]  air or not.
[07:23.000 --> 07:24.000]  I'll just pretend like we are.
[07:24.000 --> 07:25.000]  Okay.
[07:25.000 --> 07:30.000]  Anyway, I was talking about taking care of this carcass we all live in.
[07:30.000 --> 07:38.000]  The technology is very close at hand for all of us to live out this current millennium
[07:38.000 --> 07:40.000]  so long as we take care of this carcass.
[07:40.000 --> 07:46.000]  I was talking about smoking, and I've never smoked, so I'm not an ex-smoker.
[07:46.000 --> 07:50.000]  I've never smoked my whole life, so it never was a big deal for me.
[07:50.000 --> 07:51.000]  People can smoke around me.
[07:51.000 --> 07:54.000]  It doesn't bother me because I'm not an ex-smoker.
[07:54.000 --> 07:58.000]  Ex-smokers, it makes them nuts, but it doesn't bother me.
[07:58.000 --> 08:01.000]  So I never paid much attention to it until I looked at this graph.
[08:01.000 --> 08:09.000]  And the graph gradually rose over the different things that caused premature death.
[08:09.000 --> 08:17.000]  But when it got to smoking-related illnesses, the graph went straight up right off the chart.
[08:17.000 --> 08:24.000]  It was like 500 times greater than everything else.
[08:24.000 --> 08:28.000]  It was absolutely terrifying.
[08:28.000 --> 08:31.000]  So anyway, that's all I'm going to say about smoking.
[08:31.000 --> 08:36.000]  Otherwise, we need to take care of this body.
[08:36.000 --> 08:39.000]  I'm 65.
[08:39.000 --> 08:46.000]  When I was 12 or 13, my body had no weight of its own.
[08:46.000 --> 08:51.000]  I moved around as if my body weighed nothing.
[08:51.000 --> 08:57.000]  I could stand up, climb stairs, and I didn't feel the weight of my body.
[08:57.000 --> 09:04.000]  As I got older, my body began to become heavier.
[09:04.000 --> 09:08.000]  I sensed it as feeling heavier.
[09:08.000 --> 09:12.000]  And over time, this increased quite a bit.
[09:12.000 --> 09:19.000]  When I first realized how restricted my movement had became,
[09:19.000 --> 09:23.000]  I was working with my son, and he was about 20 at the time.
[09:23.000 --> 09:29.000]  I had this trailer that was about four feet high, and he just walked off the back.
[09:29.000 --> 09:35.000]  He just stepped off the back, hit the ground, and sprung with his knees and hips
[09:35.000 --> 09:38.000]  and walked away as if it was nothing.
[09:38.000 --> 09:47.000]  And I looked at that and thought, there was a time I could do that, but I can't do that anymore.
[09:47.000 --> 09:50.000]  If I were to step off the back of that four-foot-high trailer and hit the ground,
[09:50.000 --> 09:55.000]  it'd feel like somebody hit me in the back with a sledgehammer.
[09:55.000 --> 10:02.000]  And I got to looking seriously for what the problem was,
[10:02.000 --> 10:11.000]  and pretty much it turned out that it was all muscle atrophy, tense muscles.
[10:11.000 --> 10:18.000]  We have this capacity to lock down a muscle when it's injured.
[10:18.000 --> 10:22.000]  If you tear a muscle or damage a muscle, it will tend to lock down.
[10:22.000 --> 10:28.000]  If you do weightlifting, the way you make your muscles bigger is you cause microterrorism in the muscles.
[10:28.000 --> 10:34.000]  Well, if you do some strenuous lifting the next day, you notice that your muscles are stiff and sore.
[10:34.000 --> 10:41.000]  And that's because all those little places in the muscle where you have caused microterrorism,
[10:41.000 --> 10:45.000]  while they're healing, they heal by growing more muscle tissue.
[10:45.000 --> 10:47.000]  But while they're healing, they go into atrophy.
[10:47.000 --> 10:50.000]  They're locked down, so you can't move it.
[10:50.000 --> 10:53.000]  You can damage a portion of a bicep.
[10:53.000 --> 10:56.000]  And that portion of your bicep...
[10:59.000 --> 11:07.000]  Okay, I'm getting some messages from my producer that don't look so happy.
[11:07.000 --> 11:10.000]  I think we're good. I think we're good.
[11:10.000 --> 11:14.000]  I get little beeps in my headset, and sometimes it confuses me.
[11:14.000 --> 11:16.000]  I think we're good.
[11:16.000 --> 11:18.000]  The message was from O5.
[11:18.000 --> 11:20.000]  Forget all this nonsense. I'm just babbling.
[11:20.000 --> 11:25.000]  Okay, when we tear a muscle or damage a muscle, it locks down.
[11:25.000 --> 11:31.000]  And like in your bicep, you can tear a portion of your bicep, and that portion will lock down.
[11:31.000 --> 11:36.000]  But you can still get pretty decent movement in that bicep.
[11:36.000 --> 11:39.000]  But if you overextend the bicep, it'll hurt.
[11:39.000 --> 11:44.000]  You'll have to stop because a portion of it's locked down, and it can't fully extend.
[11:44.000 --> 11:51.000]  Once that portion of the muscle begins to heal, the pain in the muscle will decrease,
[11:51.000 --> 11:56.000]  so that as you extend it, you will stretch that portion of the muscle back out.
[11:56.000 --> 12:01.000]  We have a capacity to lock down the muscle when it's injured.
[12:01.000 --> 12:08.000]  We have no mechanism to release it, no natural mechanism other than movement.
[12:08.000 --> 12:15.000]  So as the muscle heals, you'll tend to extend it farther because the pain decreases.
[12:15.000 --> 12:17.000]  Problem.
[12:17.000 --> 12:22.000]  In your back, you have very large muscles, very strong muscles that barely move.
[12:22.000 --> 12:24.000]  You damage one of those.
[12:24.000 --> 12:27.000]  It will lock down until it heals.
[12:27.000 --> 12:35.000]  And while it's locked down and healing, the other muscles around it will take up its movement.
[12:35.000 --> 12:40.000]  The problem with that is, is once the muscle heals,
[12:40.000 --> 12:45.000]  because these other muscles are taking up that movement, you never stretch it back out again.
[12:45.000 --> 12:50.000]  And you'll get sensor motor amnesia for that muscle.
[12:50.000 --> 12:55.000]  And then these other muscles that are overextending themselves to take up that movement
[12:55.000 --> 12:59.000]  will overextend themselves and damage one of those, and it'll lock down.
[12:59.000 --> 13:03.000]  And you can gradually begin to stiffen up.
[13:03.000 --> 13:06.000]  Over time, you tighten up more and more.
[13:06.000 --> 13:09.000]  Have you ever seen anybody with Dowager's Hump?
[13:09.000 --> 13:14.000]  Older people, their shoulders begin to tip forward.
[13:14.000 --> 13:21.000]  Instead of walking with a long, easy gait, they start to walk in a shuffling gait
[13:21.000 --> 13:25.000]  where the hip no longer flows with their body.
[13:25.000 --> 13:31.000]  Their hip, their back and hips stay still, and the legs move under the hip.
[13:31.000 --> 13:34.000]  And this gradually restricts their movement.
[13:34.000 --> 13:37.000]  This is all muscle atrophy.
[13:37.000 --> 13:42.000]  While we don't have a mechanism directly to release those muscles,
[13:42.000 --> 13:49.000]  we do have a mechanism to tell the body when it's holding, or tell the mind
[13:49.000 --> 13:52.000]  when it's holding a muscle too tight.
[13:52.000 --> 13:54.000]  And that's called pain.
[13:54.000 --> 13:58.000]  If you overextend a muscle or you overstress a muscle, it hurts.
[13:58.000 --> 14:02.000]  And it sends a message to the mind to back off.
[14:02.000 --> 14:06.000]  Like if you pick up something too heavy and you feel a muscle start to tear,
[14:06.000 --> 14:11.000]  you will reflexively release the pressure.
[14:11.000 --> 14:20.000]  Well, myotherapy, shiatsu, acupressure, there are a lot of pressure point therapies
[14:20.000 --> 14:24.000]  that use that very mechanism to release these muscles.
[14:24.000 --> 14:29.000]  The body prudent method is generally referred to as pain erasure.
[14:29.000 --> 14:36.000]  They will go in and find a place in the muscle that if they press on it, it hurts.
[14:36.000 --> 14:42.000]  And they'll press on it to where, if on a scale of 1 to 10,
[14:42.000 --> 14:46.000]  10 would be the point at which you would tense from the pain.
[14:46.000 --> 14:50.000]  They press to about a 7, just to annoy it good,
[14:50.000 --> 14:54.000]  but not so much that you would tend to tense and back away from it.
[14:54.000 --> 14:59.000]  And they tend to hold that about 7 seconds and then move another inch and press.
[14:59.000 --> 15:08.000]  If you can find a muscle that if you press on it, it hurts, it's an atrophy.
[15:08.000 --> 15:10.000]  And when you start looking for these places,
[15:10.000 --> 15:13.000]  especially in your shoulders and your lower back,
[15:13.000 --> 15:17.000]  you'll find areas in there that you think are bones.
[15:17.000 --> 15:20.000]  And if you press on them, it hurts like crazy.
[15:20.000 --> 15:23.000]  Well, bones don't hurt if you press on them.
[15:23.000 --> 15:25.000]  Just reach over and press on your elbow.
[15:25.000 --> 15:29.000]  Your elbow has, that's probably where a bone is closest to the surface,
[15:29.000 --> 15:30.000]  if anywhere in your body.
[15:30.000 --> 15:33.000]  When you press on it, it doesn't hurt.
[15:33.000 --> 15:37.000]  If you press on something that feels like a bone and it hurts,
[15:37.000 --> 15:40.000]  it's not a bone, it's a muscle.
[15:40.000 --> 15:44.000]  And in your sacroiliac and up in your upper shoulders,
[15:44.000 --> 15:49.000]  there will be places in there that absolutely feel like bone.
[15:49.000 --> 15:52.000]  But they hurt like crazy if you press on them.
[15:52.000 --> 15:57.000]  So the trick is press on them for 7 seconds.
[15:57.000 --> 16:02.000]  On a scale of 1 to 10, press to about a 7 and hold for about 7 seconds.
[16:02.000 --> 16:05.000]  And then move about a half inch away and press again.
[16:05.000 --> 16:09.000]  You will be amazed at what this does.
[16:09.000 --> 16:11.000]  Okay, great technique.
[16:11.000 --> 16:13.000]  I've known about this technique for years.
[16:13.000 --> 16:15.000]  I use it on other people all the time,
[16:15.000 --> 16:18.000]  but I never had anybody who could use it on me.
[16:18.000 --> 16:25.000]  So finally, it dawned on me to develop a tool that would allow me
[16:25.000 --> 16:30.000]  to reach those places on my own body that I can't reach.
[16:30.000 --> 16:36.000]  Primarily the upper back and shoulders and my hips.
[16:36.000 --> 16:39.000]  And I've designed one of those tools.
[16:39.000 --> 16:42.000]  And when I come back, I'll tell you a little bit about it
[16:42.000 --> 16:44.000]  and then we'll go to Jeff in Maryland.
[16:44.000 --> 16:46.000]  Randy Kelton, New of La Radio.
[16:46.000 --> 16:50.000]  Our call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:50.000 --> 16:51.000]  Give us a call.
[16:51.000 --> 16:53.000]  We'll keep our call lines open all night.
[16:53.000 --> 17:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.000 --> 17:04.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[17:04.000 --> 17:06.000]  except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.000 --> 17:09.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[17:09.000 --> 17:11.000]  And it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.000 --> 17:16.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment
[17:16.000 --> 17:17.000]  is good nutrition.
[17:17.000 --> 17:20.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated,
[17:20.000 --> 17:22.000]  adulterated, and mutilated,
[17:22.000 --> 17:25.000]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.000 --> 17:30.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[17:30.000 --> 17:31.000]  most of which we reject.
[17:31.000 --> 17:34.000]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much,
[17:34.000 --> 17:39.000]  we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs,
[17:39.000 --> 17:40.000]  and many others.
[17:40.000 --> 17:43.000]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com,
[17:43.000 --> 17:48.000]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:48.000 --> 17:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:52.000 --> 17:55.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[17:55.000 --> 17:59.000]  help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:59.000 --> 18:01.000]  Order now.
[18:01.000 --> 18:06.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:06.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:13.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors,
[18:13.000 --> 18:15.000]  and now you can win too.
[18:15.000 --> 18:19.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court
[18:19.000 --> 18:21.000]  using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:21.000 --> 18:25.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons,
[18:25.000 --> 18:27.000]  how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:27.000 --> 18:29.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports,
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:44.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[18:44.000 --> 18:50.000]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 18:57.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[18:57.000 --> 19:01.000]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:05.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[19:05.000 --> 19:32.000]  logosradio.com.
[19:32.000 --> 19:42.000]  Okay, we are back.
[19:42.000 --> 19:51.000]  Randy Kelton in Rule of Law Radio on this Friday, June the 12th, 2015.
[19:51.000 --> 19:54.000]  And I developed this tool.
[19:54.000 --> 20:00.000]  And if anybody has back pains, if you have shooting pains,
[20:00.000 --> 20:04.000]  I once talked to a personal injury lawyer and he said,
[20:04.000 --> 20:11.000]  if you want to make a claim that can't be refuted, you got shooting pains.
[20:11.000 --> 20:20.000]  Because the doctors consider shooting pains as an anomaly.
[20:20.000 --> 20:21.000]  I'm trying to think of the right word.
[20:21.000 --> 20:22.000]  It's syndrome.
[20:22.000 --> 20:25.000]  They don't know what it is.
[20:25.000 --> 20:27.000]  And they don't know how to fix it.
[20:27.000 --> 20:30.000]  So if you claim you got shooting pains, they don't know how to test for it.
[20:30.000 --> 20:32.000]  They don't know any of that stuff.
[20:32.000 --> 20:38.000]  So you claim that and you get a good settlement.
[20:38.000 --> 20:42.000]  Well, I heard that and I thought, well, that's nonsense.
[20:42.000 --> 20:45.000]  Shooting pains are easy to fix.
[20:45.000 --> 20:48.000]  Shooting pains are muscle atrophy or muscle tension.
[20:48.000 --> 20:51.000]  You have muscles in spasm.
[20:51.000 --> 20:54.000]  If you have shooting pains in an area,
[20:54.000 --> 21:00.000]  you press on that area and find places that if you press on them,
[21:00.000 --> 21:05.000]  they hurt and press on them and the shooting pains go away.
[21:05.000 --> 21:11.000]  It's like magic, except it's really relatively simple.
[21:11.000 --> 21:14.000]  It's the mechanism I spoke of earlier.
[21:14.000 --> 21:19.000]  If a muscle's in spasm and you press on it and you apply pain to the muscle,
[21:19.000 --> 21:23.000]  it sends a message back to the mind that it's holding the muscle too tight
[21:23.000 --> 21:27.000]  and the brain will back away from it and release it.
[21:27.000 --> 21:32.000]  It overcomes sensory motor amnesia.
[21:32.000 --> 21:39.000]  You see people walking around shuffling their feet and their back is hunched over.
[21:39.000 --> 21:44.000]  They are working very, very hard to stay upright.
[21:44.000 --> 21:49.000]  And that's because they have so many muscles competing with one another.
[21:49.000 --> 21:54.000]  They have so many muscles that they're holding like concrete.
[21:54.000 --> 21:57.000]  And this is why they have no energy.
[21:57.000 --> 22:03.000]  Well, I put together this tool for this purpose
[22:03.000 --> 22:07.000]  so that I could reach those places in my back and shoulders.
[22:07.000 --> 22:12.000]  And I almost can't believe the difference.
[22:12.000 --> 22:14.000]  I'm 65.
[22:14.000 --> 22:16.000]  I was in a courthouse the other day
[22:16.000 --> 22:20.000]  and I tend to run up stairs taking two at a time,
[22:20.000 --> 22:24.000]  but I pretty well have to use the handrail.
[22:24.000 --> 22:30.000]  After using this tool for two weeks, the handrail got in my way.
[22:30.000 --> 22:34.000]  I didn't run up stairs taking two at a time.
[22:34.000 --> 22:38.000]  I walked up stairs taking two at a time.
[22:38.000 --> 22:42.000]  And I literally felt no body weight
[22:42.000 --> 22:50.000]  because I didn't have competing muscles that I'm having to fight against to get myself to move.
[22:50.000 --> 22:54.000]  If you have a muscle spasm, I was stretching out my calf muscles
[22:54.000 --> 22:58.000]  because of past injuries.
[22:58.000 --> 23:05.000]  And I stretched too hard and damaged the muscle in the front of my ankle.
[23:05.000 --> 23:08.000]  I got up the next day and I couldn't hardly walk.
[23:08.000 --> 23:13.000]  Every step I took, my leg would collapse from the spasm in that muscle.
[23:13.000 --> 23:16.000]  After about 30 minutes, I thought, heck with this,
[23:16.000 --> 23:19.000]  and I went and laid down on the bed and picked up my tool
[23:19.000 --> 23:22.000]  and did pressure points on that sore area of the muscle
[23:22.000 --> 23:28.000]  where it was cramping up or spasming so I couldn't walk on it.
[23:28.000 --> 23:31.000]  Ten minutes, it was gone.
[23:31.000 --> 23:34.000]  Never came back.
[23:34.000 --> 23:40.000]  A lot of these injuries we get that we think are damaged muscles,
[23:40.000 --> 23:44.000]  really we've just put the muscle in spasm.
[23:44.000 --> 23:48.000]  And if we go in there and put a little pressure on it, spasm goes away.
[23:48.000 --> 23:52.000]  If we don't go in there and put pressure on it and make the spasm go away,
[23:52.000 --> 23:59.000]  the muscle will wind up going into atrophy and cause us problems forever.
[23:59.000 --> 24:03.000]  Anyway, I developed the tools for this.
[24:03.000 --> 24:11.000]  And if anybody has back pain, if they have spasms or stiffness, send me an email.
[24:11.000 --> 24:13.000]  I'm writing up plans for this tool.
[24:13.000 --> 24:15.000]  It's really simple to make, it's really straightforward.
[24:15.000 --> 24:17.000]  I'll send you some photos of it.
[24:17.000 --> 24:23.000]  It's all made out of just standard off-the-shelf PVC pipe fittings.
[24:23.000 --> 24:26.000]  For $12 worth of pipe fittings and a $3 can of glue,
[24:26.000 --> 24:31.000]  you can make one of these things and you will not believe
[24:31.000 --> 24:38.000]  the difference in your energy level and your ability to move without pain.
[24:38.000 --> 24:42.000]  Okay, that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[24:42.000 --> 24:47.000]  So anybody who's interested, send me an email and I'll send you the plans.
[24:47.000 --> 24:55.000]  Okay, we have a very special guest tonight, Mr. Jeff from Maryland.
[24:55.000 --> 24:57.000]  Hello, Mr. Jeff.
[24:57.000 --> 25:01.000]  First off, I'd like to apologize for having not muted up
[25:01.000 --> 25:04.000]  and having coughed during your presentation.
[25:04.000 --> 25:05.000]  My apologies.
[25:05.000 --> 25:09.000]  Oh, they just thought that was me.
[25:09.000 --> 25:10.000]  That's all right.
[25:10.000 --> 25:12.000]  I muted it out.
[25:12.000 --> 25:14.000]  Not a problem.
[25:14.000 --> 25:21.000]  I did resend to you, that is send again, the forward flow agreement
[25:21.000 --> 25:25.000]  that was in the Almonte versus Chase Bank case.
[25:25.000 --> 25:28.000]  I don't know where you got the thing from the SEC,
[25:28.000 --> 25:31.000]  but it wasn't what I intended to send to you.
[25:31.000 --> 25:33.000]  I must have sent you something by mistake.
[25:33.000 --> 25:40.000]  Okay, Jeff sent me a case from the SEC,
[25:40.000 --> 25:44.000]  and it was an interesting case because the SEC was a problem,
[25:44.000 --> 25:53.000]  but for me it was more interesting because the SEC has administrative procedures
[25:53.000 --> 25:55.000]  that it uses.
[25:55.000 --> 26:02.000]  And some guy sold a bunch of stock, and he sold it at just the right time
[26:02.000 --> 26:04.000]  and made a killing.
[26:04.000 --> 26:09.000]  And the SEC said you had to have had inside knowledge
[26:09.000 --> 26:13.000]  in order to make that trade at that time.
[26:13.000 --> 26:14.000]  And they went after him.
[26:14.000 --> 26:18.000]  They had no evidence, just the fact that he made an opportune trade
[26:18.000 --> 26:21.000]  at just the right time.
[26:21.000 --> 26:24.000]  They considered that a probable cause, and they went after him.
[26:24.000 --> 26:30.000]  Well, the SEC had a set of procedures where they could literally run you
[26:30.000 --> 26:33.000]  through the wringer.
[26:33.000 --> 26:39.000]  And what his argument was is that he was not registered with the SEC.
[26:39.000 --> 26:42.000]  He was a private trader.
[26:42.000 --> 26:48.000]  So he had not agreed to their regulatory scheme.
[26:48.000 --> 26:53.000]  And the SEC seemed to feel like they could simply draw anyone
[26:53.000 --> 26:56.000]  into their regulatory scheme,
[26:56.000 --> 27:01.000]  and they would have to use the SEC's administrative procedures.
[27:01.000 --> 27:06.000]  And he was saying that he didn't have to use their administrative procedures,
[27:06.000 --> 27:11.000]  that the nature of their administrative procedures denied him a due process,
[27:11.000 --> 27:16.000]  and that he could go straight to the federal courts to adjudicate the issue
[27:16.000 --> 27:19.000]  rather than with the SEC.
[27:19.000 --> 27:20.000]  I didn't get to finish.
[27:20.000 --> 27:24.000]  It was a rather long opinion,
[27:24.000 --> 27:29.000]  but essentially the opinion said that, yes, he's right.
[27:29.000 --> 27:36.000]  He had not filed with the SEC for a license to sell securities.
[27:36.000 --> 27:42.000]  Therefore, he had not agreed to your regulatory scheme.
[27:42.000 --> 27:47.000]  And simply because you had an administrative procedure,
[27:47.000 --> 27:53.000]  did not preclude him in his right to other remedies.
[27:53.000 --> 27:58.000]  They were saying that since they had a procedure, you had to use their procedure.
[27:58.000 --> 28:02.000]  And fortunately, the federal court said, no, he doesn't.
[28:02.000 --> 28:04.000]  Anyway, enough of that.
[28:04.000 --> 28:06.000]  We'll get to that and other issues.
[28:06.000 --> 28:12.000]  What's really significant, I think, about that particular situation
[28:12.000 --> 28:18.000]  is we have all kinds of articles flying around the Internet
[28:18.000 --> 28:24.000]  that this court has done away with administrative law, and they haven't.
[28:24.000 --> 28:29.000]  This is another one of those things I get in the patriot community,
[28:29.000 --> 28:35.000]  is they read a case and horribly misinterpret the case.
[28:35.000 --> 28:40.000]  We had one here in North Texas, a shopping mall I go to on a regular basis,
[28:40.000 --> 28:43.000]  North Richmond Hills Mall.
[28:43.000 --> 28:48.000]  They wanted to capture the property south of them,
[28:48.000 --> 28:56.000]  a large area of housing development, and turn it into a strip mall.
[28:56.000 --> 29:00.000]  And they got the city to condemn the property
[29:00.000 --> 29:05.000]  because if they turned it into a strip mall, the city could collect more taxes.
[29:05.000 --> 29:10.000]  And the people in the area said, no, no, this is our private property.
[29:10.000 --> 29:12.000]  You can't take this.
[29:12.000 --> 29:14.000]  And the state said, yeah, we can.
[29:14.000 --> 29:16.000]  We can take it under imminent domain.
[29:16.000 --> 29:19.000]  So they took it all the way to the federal court,
[29:19.000 --> 29:25.000]  and the federal court denied the homeowners remedy.
[29:25.000 --> 29:31.000]  And oh, the patriot community was just jumping up and down and waving their arms
[29:31.000 --> 29:34.000]  and railing in righteous indignation.
[29:34.000 --> 29:42.000]  The Supreme Court let the states steal private citizens' property.
[29:42.000 --> 29:45.000]  They did not read the case.
[29:45.000 --> 29:50.000]  The Supreme Court said, this is a state issue, not our business.
[29:50.000 --> 29:53.000]  And I thought it was a wonderful decision.
[29:53.000 --> 29:57.000]  If you don't like it, change the law, but don't ask us to override the state.
[29:57.000 --> 30:01.000]  Randy Kelton, River Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[30:01.000 --> 30:04.000]  Is it stealing to download music from the Internet?
[30:04.000 --> 30:08.000]  You might be surprised at the way college students answer that question.
[30:08.000 --> 30:10.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment
[30:10.000 --> 30:15.000]  with results of a new study that explores current attitudes about digital piracy.
[30:15.000 --> 30:17.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.000 --> 30:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.000 --> 30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:26.000 --> 30:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.000 --> 30:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:34.000 --> 30:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:37.000 --> 30:41.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.000 --> 30:44.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.000 --> 30:48.000]  You've probably seen public service messages about digital piracy.
[30:48.000 --> 30:54.000]  One of the most famous ads likens illegally downloading digital content to stealing a car,
[30:54.000 --> 30:57.000]  but apparently those education efforts aren't working.
[30:57.000 --> 31:01.000]  A new study by the University of Nebraska found that students believe shoplifting a CD
[31:01.000 --> 31:03.000]  from a music store is wrong.
[31:03.000 --> 31:07.000]  But those same students view illegal digital downloads as far less serious.
[31:07.000 --> 31:10.000]  Researchers believe digital piracy is more acceptable
[31:10.000 --> 31:13.000]  because there's no physical danger and no visible victim.
[31:13.000 --> 31:16.000]  And since the practice is widespread on college campuses,
[31:16.000 --> 31:18.000]  there's a lot of social support.
[31:18.000 --> 31:20.000]  But as an author who's had my own work pirated,
[31:20.000 --> 31:23.000]  I can say it's pretty unpleasant from this end.
[31:23.000 --> 31:25.000]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht.
[31:25.000 --> 31:52.000]  More news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:55.000 --> 32:02.000]  What our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you only at sqsa.org.
[32:02.000 --> 32:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:05.000 --> 32:08.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[32:08.000 --> 32:10.000]  and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:16.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:16.000 --> 32:18.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:18.000 --> 32:20.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:24.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce
[32:24.000 --> 32:26.000]  or observe our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.000 --> 32:32.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:32.000 --> 32:34.000]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:38.000 --> 32:41.000]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:43.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:43.000 --> 32:46.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.000 --> 32:48.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:48.000 --> 32:51.000]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:53.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[32:53.000 --> 32:55.000]  from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 32:57.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have
[32:57.000 --> 32:59.000]  the free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.000 --> 33:26.000]  Music
[33:26.000 --> 33:33.000]  Okay, we are back.
[33:33.000 --> 33:37.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, here with Jeff Cedric.
[33:37.000 --> 33:42.000]  And the point of that case was, is all these people were complaining
[33:42.000 --> 33:46.000]  that the Supreme Court didn't step in and stop the state
[33:46.000 --> 33:50.000]  from taking property away from state citizens.
[33:50.000 --> 33:53.000]  And I heard all this complaining and I thought,
[33:53.000 --> 33:57.000]  are you guys kidding me?
[33:57.000 --> 34:00.000]  Are you not paying attention?
[34:00.000 --> 34:05.000]  The Supreme Court said this is a state issue
[34:05.000 --> 34:10.000]  and we have no power to intervene in the state.
[34:10.000 --> 34:14.000]  Even if what the state is doing is horribly wrong
[34:14.000 --> 34:18.000]  in accordance with state law, if you don't like it,
[34:18.000 --> 34:22.000]  change the law but don't ask us to step in and fix it.
[34:22.000 --> 34:29.000]  I read that and thought, what a wonderful decision.
[34:29.000 --> 34:33.000]  And these guys asking the federal court to step in
[34:33.000 --> 34:36.000]  and interfere with state law are the same ones
[34:36.000 --> 34:40.000]  that are railing righteous indignation when the feds step in
[34:40.000 --> 34:45.000]  in an area where they want to do something and they're restricted.
[34:45.000 --> 34:51.000]  So we really have to develop a consistent set of beliefs
[34:51.000 --> 34:55.000]  and that's why I like this SEC case,
[34:55.000 --> 35:02.000]  because in effect they limited, they prevented the SEC
[35:02.000 --> 35:09.000]  from forcing a litigant to use their remedy.
[35:09.000 --> 35:14.000]  Okay, you had some more to say about that one, Jeff?
[35:14.000 --> 35:17.000]  No, not really, not really.
[35:17.000 --> 35:21.000]  Well, actually, the court did not overturn
[35:21.000 --> 35:27.000]  or hand down a cease and desist order on the part of the SEC.
[35:27.000 --> 35:30.000]  All it did was enjoin it from taking further action
[35:30.000 --> 35:34.000]  until the case before the U.S. District Court had been completed.
[35:34.000 --> 35:38.000]  Yes, and this was a matter of election of remedy.
[35:38.000 --> 35:42.000]  They were saying that this litigant had no power
[35:42.000 --> 35:45.000]  to elect the federal courts as remedy,
[35:45.000 --> 35:48.000]  that they had to use the SEC and the federal courts said,
[35:48.000 --> 35:53.000]  no, no, no, no, no, the federal courts can't act as remedy
[35:53.000 --> 35:56.000]  and they can't be precluded by the SEC.
[35:56.000 --> 36:00.000]  So they told the SEC, since he chooses this remedy,
[36:00.000 --> 36:04.000]  you have to wait until he's exhausted this remedy.
[36:04.000 --> 36:05.000]  Right.
[36:05.000 --> 36:08.000]  Does that sound like a correct characterization?
[36:08.000 --> 36:09.000]  Yes.
[36:09.000 --> 36:14.000]  Okay, let's go back to the purpose.
[36:14.000 --> 36:16.000]  They're a Monte case.
[36:16.000 --> 36:17.000]  Okay.
[36:17.000 --> 36:20.000]  Okay, this woman is working for Chase
[36:20.000 --> 36:26.000]  and Chase is making up this portfolio sale to someone else
[36:26.000 --> 36:31.000]  and she looks at it and says, you guys are lying like dogs
[36:31.000 --> 36:33.000]  and you're making false statements
[36:33.000 --> 36:35.000]  and I won't have anything to do with it.
[36:35.000 --> 36:38.000]  And then Chase comes back, they fire her
[36:38.000 --> 36:40.000]  and they come back and say, well,
[36:40.000 --> 36:44.000]  she can't claim that we were committing fraud
[36:44.000 --> 36:46.000]  because no fraud was created.
[36:46.000 --> 36:52.000]  So the question it brought to me, Jeff, was,
[36:52.000 --> 36:57.000]  regardless of what the agreement was between Chase
[36:57.000 --> 37:01.000]  and whoever they was selling this product to,
[37:01.000 --> 37:05.000]  the law as this woman could see it
[37:05.000 --> 37:09.000]  forbade her from doing certain things.
[37:09.000 --> 37:12.000]  Chase told her to do these things
[37:12.000 --> 37:16.000]  and from her perspective the law forbade her to do that
[37:16.000 --> 37:19.000]  so she refused to do it.
[37:19.000 --> 37:24.000]  And what Chase, the portion I was able to get through,
[37:24.000 --> 37:27.000]  if I read it right, Chase was saying that
[37:27.000 --> 37:33.000]  regardless of what we did in the process,
[37:33.000 --> 37:39.000]  if the end result can be shown to have not been fraudulent,
[37:39.000 --> 37:45.000]  then this person wasn't wrongfully terminated
[37:45.000 --> 37:52.000]  because she refused to do things that would ordinarily be fraudulent.
[37:52.000 --> 37:54.000]  Did I get that right, Jeff?
[37:54.000 --> 37:58.000]  Well, yeah, pretty much so, but you see, Randy,
[37:58.000 --> 38:02.000]  that's not what I consider to be important.
[38:02.000 --> 38:07.000]  Okay, I was going to the nature of what the issue was.
[38:07.000 --> 38:09.000]  Yes, that's important.
[38:09.000 --> 38:12.000]  Yeah, and what you're going to is
[38:12.000 --> 38:17.000]  essentially admissions on the part of JP Morgan.
[38:17.000 --> 38:20.000]  Are we chasing that right?
[38:20.000 --> 38:25.000]  Well, yes, in writing on the public record,
[38:25.000 --> 38:29.000]  Chase is knowingly selling junk debt
[38:29.000 --> 38:36.000]  that they can't determine if the debt's been paid or not paid.
[38:36.000 --> 38:40.000]  They can't determine if the supposed debtor is in fact the debtor.
[38:40.000 --> 38:45.000]  They can't support or evidence that the debt belongs to them
[38:45.000 --> 38:49.000]  or what the amount is.
[38:49.000 --> 38:53.000]  And see, in that motion to dismiss,
[38:53.000 --> 38:56.000]  they go through all of that and point out that,
[38:56.000 --> 38:58.000]  yeah, we're selling this kind of debt
[38:58.000 --> 39:02.000]  and here's what we're telling the buyers,
[39:02.000 --> 39:05.000]  and they know full well what they're buying,
[39:05.000 --> 39:08.000]  ergo it's not fraud.
[39:08.000 --> 39:14.000]  And my whole issue is people out there need to be aware
[39:14.000 --> 39:18.000]  that a lot of times when the debt collector calls you up
[39:18.000 --> 39:21.000]  and says you owe this debt,
[39:21.000 --> 39:27.000]  it either was paid or it's not yours or it was discharged in bankruptcy.
[39:27.000 --> 39:31.000]  It's never yours and they can't prove that it ever was.
[39:31.000 --> 39:35.000]  But they're just wearing corn up and down one side or the other that it is.
[39:35.000 --> 39:41.000]  The presumption is that the banks keep good records.
[39:41.000 --> 39:44.000]  Yeah, well, that footnote in the Ham case,
[39:44.000 --> 39:47.000]  when they said that the judge basically said
[39:47.000 --> 39:54.000]  it's the credit industry's own fault because of their sloppy record keeping.
[39:54.000 --> 39:55.000]  Exactly.
[39:55.000 --> 39:57.000]  They brought it on themselves.
[39:57.000 --> 40:01.000]  So if you're out here and you have someone come to you
[40:01.000 --> 40:04.000]  and claim that you owe them a debt,
[40:04.000 --> 40:09.000]  now you may know that you incurred a debt.
[40:09.000 --> 40:15.000]  And the debt that you incurred is in an amount similar to the debt
[40:15.000 --> 40:20.000]  that this entity is claiming to collect.
[40:20.000 --> 40:27.000]  And the debt was incurred to an entity with a similar name.
[40:27.000 --> 40:34.000]  But what you don't know is whether or not the person making the claim
[40:34.000 --> 40:39.000]  of agency standing or capacity to collect the debt
[40:39.000 --> 40:42.000]  actually has that agency standing or capacity,
[40:42.000 --> 40:46.000]  even if it is the entity to whom you incurred the debt.
[40:46.000 --> 40:47.000]  Is that correct?
[40:47.000 --> 40:50.000]  Right, right.
[40:50.000 --> 40:55.000]  They have no evidence to support their claims.
[40:55.000 --> 41:02.000]  Unfortunately, you can't walk into court and say, prove it.
[41:02.000 --> 41:07.000]  You have to walk into court and say, I deny.
[41:07.000 --> 41:11.000]  And out of your denial, they have to prove it.
[41:11.000 --> 41:17.000]  When someone makes a proactive statement,
[41:17.000 --> 41:23.000]  their statement is accepted as true on its face.
[41:23.000 --> 41:24.000]  Right.
[41:24.000 --> 41:30.000]  And it will remain accepted true on its face until it is disputed.
[41:30.000 --> 41:31.000]  Right.
[41:31.000 --> 41:36.000]  Once it is disputed, then the proactive statement
[41:36.000 --> 41:39.000]  must be supported by facts and law.
[41:39.000 --> 41:42.000]  Right.
[41:42.000 --> 41:44.000]  And that's for a judicial economy.
[41:44.000 --> 41:48.000]  So you don't have to prove that you're a human being.
[41:48.000 --> 41:51.000]  You don't have to prove that you're breathing.
[41:51.000 --> 41:54.000]  You don't have to prove that you're in Texas when you're standing in Texas.
[41:54.000 --> 41:58.000]  All this stuff that's not in contention, you don't have to prove all that stuff.
[41:58.000 --> 42:02.000]  The only thing you have to prove is what's in contention.
[42:02.000 --> 42:07.000]  So if you say a whole bunch of stuff and one of those things is in contention,
[42:07.000 --> 42:16.000]  then the other side has to notify the court that this particular assertion is in contention.
[42:16.000 --> 42:18.000]  And you do that by disputing the contention.
[42:18.000 --> 42:23.000]  Then it's no longer accepted as true on its face.
[42:23.000 --> 42:28.000]  Well, I can't really go quite so far as to make that statement
[42:28.000 --> 42:35.000]  because I don't think it's really quite that accurate.
[42:35.000 --> 42:41.000]  You know, you have to contest it and show where the holes are in their argument
[42:41.000 --> 42:49.000]  because otherwise the presumption still will reside with the plaintiff making the claim.
[42:49.000 --> 42:56.000]  You have to overcome the presumption, not just sit there and deny it
[42:56.000 --> 42:58.000]  because the court's not going to accept that denial.
[42:58.000 --> 42:59.000]  Okay.
[42:59.000 --> 43:06.000]  I simplified somewhat in that when someone makes the proactive statement,
[43:06.000 --> 43:11.000]  then it is accepted on its face.
[43:11.000 --> 43:16.000]  In order to overcome it, you can't just say, oh, that's hogwash.
[43:16.000 --> 43:25.000]  You have to come back and give prima facie evidence to show as to why it is not true.
[43:25.000 --> 43:26.000]  I see.
[43:26.000 --> 43:27.000]  Great.
[43:27.000 --> 43:30.000]  They say we're only that simple, Randy.
[43:30.000 --> 43:34.000]  Oh, my goodness.
[43:34.000 --> 43:36.000]  Well, we've got to have a place to start.
[43:36.000 --> 43:41.000]  It does get more complex than this, and we'll talk about that complexity
[43:41.000 --> 43:43.000]  when we come back on the other side.
[43:43.000 --> 43:45.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio.
[43:45.000 --> 43:49.000]  I call it number 512-646-1984.
[43:49.000 --> 43:50.000]  Give us a call.
[43:50.000 --> 43:53.000]  We're going to keep our call lines open all night.
[43:53.000 --> 43:55.000]  And this is our four-hour info marathon.
[43:55.000 --> 43:57.000]  So we'll have more time to examine your issues.
[43:57.000 --> 44:26.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:27.000 --> 44:49.000]  Thank you.
[44:57.000 --> 45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.000 --> 45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:07.000 --> 45:15.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.000 --> 45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.000 --> 45:53.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:53.000 --> 46:21.000]  Visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:21.000 --> 46:46.000]  Okay, we are back.
[46:46.000 --> 46:51.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, here with Jeff Sedgwick.
[46:51.000 --> 46:56.000]  And Jeff, you wanted to go to the...
[46:56.000 --> 46:59.000]  I lost the word. Pick it up, Jeff.
[46:59.000 --> 47:06.000]  Ham vs. Nation Star, which is a recent case that came out of the Florida Court of Appeals.
[47:06.000 --> 47:10.000]  Okay, hiring people who used to work for the banks to use them as witnesses.
[47:10.000 --> 47:13.000]  Okay, I think I got it. Okay, go ahead.
[47:13.000 --> 47:18.000]  During this particular foreclosure case that was filed by Aurora,
[47:18.000 --> 47:25.000]  Aurora signed the debt to Nation Star and substituted Nation Star as the plaintiff.
[47:25.000 --> 47:34.000]  Nation Star stepped in with a witness that they had that was a former employee of Aurora
[47:34.000 --> 47:39.000]  and were using their knowledge of the practices and procedures of Aurora,
[47:39.000 --> 47:46.000]  their knowledge of that as supporting their witness, their witness's authority to speak.
[47:46.000 --> 47:53.000]  But that authority got shredded because the lady may have been familiar with the practices
[47:53.000 --> 47:58.000]  and policies and procedures, but she was not familiar with that particular case.
[47:58.000 --> 48:05.000]  Furthermore, having the position that she held, she could not attest to whether or not
[48:05.000 --> 48:11.000]  in the assignment the authority to collect had been conveyed with the assignment.
[48:11.000 --> 48:17.000]  And the reason why this is important is because we're going to start seeing
[48:17.000 --> 48:26.000]  amongst the debt buyers former employees of credit card creditors.
[48:26.000 --> 48:33.000]  And they're going to try to basically snowball everybody with their supposed knowledge
[48:33.000 --> 48:38.000]  of the practices and policies of the creditor they used to work for.
[48:38.000 --> 48:43.000]  But they do not have the knowledge of that account.
[48:43.000 --> 48:47.000]  So let me get this right, make sure I got it right.
[48:47.000 --> 48:53.000]  The court said that it's not enough for you to have worked at the company.
[48:53.000 --> 48:56.000]  I mean, you might be in Canada or something.
[48:56.000 --> 49:02.000]  It's not enough for you to have a general knowledge of the practices and procedures,
[49:02.000 --> 49:05.000]  because that's what I always see in the affidavit.
[49:05.000 --> 49:06.000]  Right.
[49:06.000 --> 49:11.000]  But you must have personal knowledge of this case.
[49:11.000 --> 49:14.000]  Yes.
[49:14.000 --> 49:17.000]  And that's appropriate. That fits.
[49:17.000 --> 49:21.000]  It does. It does.
[49:21.000 --> 49:29.000]  And, you know, which, you know, even more interesting is, as the judge pointed out,
[49:29.000 --> 49:40.000]  their witness could not attest to the standing of any of the previous creditors prior to Aurora.
[49:40.000 --> 49:47.000]  So if somewhere in the chain the authority to collect was not conveyed,
[49:47.000 --> 49:52.000]  then Aurora never had it, and neither does Nation Star.
[49:52.000 --> 49:55.000]  That's something we touched on last night.
[49:55.000 --> 50:04.000]  If I look in the public record and I see an assignment from HTC Lending,
[50:04.000 --> 50:12.000]  from HTC Lending to, say, Wells Fargo or better, JP Morgan Chase,
[50:12.000 --> 50:17.000]  which one I looked at today was, I think the company was HTC Lending,
[50:17.000 --> 50:30.000]  and MERS acting as nominee for the lender and the beneficiary and beneficiary successors and assigns.
[50:30.000 --> 50:33.000]  Whenever you see that in an assignment,
[50:33.000 --> 50:39.000]  it generally means that the original beneficiary is not in existence anymore.
[50:39.000 --> 50:48.000]  If the original beneficiary is in existence, what it will say is MERS acting as nominee for HTC Lending.
[50:48.000 --> 50:53.000]  But if it doesn't say that, it's just acting for successors and assigns,
[50:53.000 --> 50:56.000]  then you go check and see if that company is out of business.
[50:56.000 --> 51:03.000]  This one went from HTC to JP Morgan Chase.
[51:03.000 --> 51:08.000]  And then from JP Morgan Chase to Deutsche Bank.
[51:08.000 --> 51:13.000]  In the assignment from JP Morgan Chase to Deutsche Bank,
[51:13.000 --> 51:25.000]  what it said was JP Morgan Chase as successor to Washington Mutual as successor to Long Beach Mortgage as successor to something else,
[51:25.000 --> 51:29.000]  and HTC was not in there.
[51:29.000 --> 51:30.000]  Right.
[51:30.000 --> 51:44.000]  So if the first assignment was insufficient, they're all, everything that follows it is worthless.
[51:44.000 --> 51:45.000]  Right.
[51:45.000 --> 51:46.000]  And the first assignment was...
[51:46.000 --> 51:54.000]  If I sell a car to you with no wheels, and you sell a car to somebody else with no wheels,
[51:54.000 --> 52:00.000]  but you say, well, the wheels should be there, well, they're not.
[52:00.000 --> 52:07.000]  You've got a vehicle with no wheels, so you've got an assignment of a promissory note with no authority to collect on it.
[52:07.000 --> 52:09.000]  Exactly.
[52:09.000 --> 52:14.000]  So if at any point in the chain, the chain gets broken.
[52:14.000 --> 52:25.000]  Okay, then what we're going through here is you've got a guy at the end, and say you've got a guy at the end that worked for HTC.
[52:25.000 --> 52:32.000]  Even though he's dead and gone, he testifies as to the practices and procedures of HTC.
[52:32.000 --> 52:39.000]  He would also have to testify to this particular transaction.
[52:39.000 --> 52:40.000]  Right.
[52:40.000 --> 52:50.000]  If I've got what the court was saying, it's not enough for you to say, well, generally we do things this way.
[52:50.000 --> 52:55.000]  He wanted to know, did you generally do this way?
[52:55.000 --> 53:01.000]  Did you actually do it this way in this particular case?
[53:01.000 --> 53:02.000]  Right.
[53:02.000 --> 53:07.000]  And absent that, he's saying it's insufficient.
[53:07.000 --> 53:21.000]  So you've got a guy at the end, he's going to have to have worked for every one of these companies and actually handled the transaction from each company to the next.
[53:21.000 --> 53:24.000]  And I don't think that's possible.
[53:24.000 --> 53:25.000]  Right.
[53:25.000 --> 53:28.000]  You couldn't work with both at the same time.
[53:28.000 --> 53:37.000]  Actually, in a credit card case, you have to have a minimum of two witnesses, really.
[53:37.000 --> 53:41.000]  Because who's got the contract?
[53:41.000 --> 53:43.000]  Yeah.
[53:43.000 --> 53:46.000]  I'm answering the question, just so you're ready.
[53:46.000 --> 53:48.000]  Who's got the contract?
[53:48.000 --> 53:51.000]  The holder should have the contract.
[53:51.000 --> 53:53.000]  Nope, he's got an adhesion contract.
[53:53.000 --> 53:55.000]  Who's got the actual contract?
[53:55.000 --> 53:57.000]  Okay, hold on.
[53:57.000 --> 53:58.000]  I don't know.
[53:58.000 --> 54:00.000]  Who has the actual contract?
[54:00.000 --> 54:05.000]  The merchant.
[54:05.000 --> 54:07.000]  The original merchant, okay.
[54:07.000 --> 54:08.000]  The original merchant.
[54:08.000 --> 54:14.000]  Offer of credit and acceptance.
[54:14.000 --> 54:15.000]  Oh, I see.
[54:15.000 --> 54:20.000]  So I go into a-
[54:20.000 --> 54:40.000]  No, wait a minute, if I go and say Walmart and I use a Capital One credit card, I should have a contract with Capital One and the merchant won't have that contract.
[54:40.000 --> 54:44.000]  Capital One will offer you the credit.
[54:44.000 --> 54:51.000]  You swipe your card and Capital One will offer you the credit and you sign for it and you accept it.
[54:51.000 --> 54:53.000]  That's the contract.
[54:53.000 --> 55:05.000]  Yeah, but does she actually do that as an agent for Walmart or does she do that as an agent for Capital One?
[55:05.000 --> 55:15.000]  Is my transaction with the credit card company or is it with the merchant?
[55:15.000 --> 55:16.000]  Well-
[55:16.000 --> 55:18.000]  I'm not paying the merchant.
[55:18.000 --> 55:23.000]  There's the intermediary.
[55:23.000 --> 55:34.000]  So my transaction would be say with Capital One and Walmart would be the intermediary.
[55:34.000 --> 55:45.000]  But she's the only one that has- but the merchant's the only one that has the contract because they keep the receipts and they're the only one to witness the transaction.
[55:45.000 --> 55:47.000]  That can prove up the debt.
[55:47.000 --> 55:49.000]  Right.
[55:49.000 --> 56:03.000]  That would literally make it virtually impossible for a credit card company to prove up a debt because they have no credible witness.
[56:03.000 --> 56:11.000]  Knowing that, Randy, how many hands did that go through before it ended up at the credit card company?
[56:11.000 --> 56:16.000]  Yeah, and that's- so I'm trying to understand this case.
[56:16.000 --> 56:29.000]  On the face of it, a ruling of this nature would tend to have the effect of eliminating the ability of companies to use credit cards
[56:29.000 --> 56:43.000]  because they couldn't prove up conclusively with a fact witness every step in the chain.
[56:43.000 --> 56:53.000]  Well, if those black letters of the law were followed, you're right.
[56:53.000 --> 57:00.000]  So that sounded like where this case- where this particular ruling would go to.
[57:00.000 --> 57:17.000]  So how would we be able to accord people credit of this nature in a way such that the one issuing the credit would actually be able to collect?
[57:17.000 --> 57:19.000]  I don't know.
[57:19.000 --> 57:31.000]  Because while I tend to be on the side of the debtor, in order to have a viable system, we have to be able to look at the other guy's side.
[57:31.000 --> 57:40.000]  And if I'm a credit card company, with this kind of ruling, I could never, ever prove up any debt.
[57:40.000 --> 57:47.000]  Well, considering it's this particular case with a foreclosure, they've got a problem.
[57:47.000 --> 57:54.000]  Now, this one's more straightforward because it's not- even if it were a line of credit,
[57:54.000 --> 57:59.000]  then the person is drawing the credit to different vendors.
[57:59.000 --> 58:04.000]  But a foreclosure, you only got one initial vendor.
[58:04.000 --> 58:07.000]  So that's more straightforward.
[58:07.000 --> 58:11.000]  In that case, it wouldn't jeopardize the credit card industry.
[58:11.000 --> 58:17.000]  But this is an interesting case if we can get it to stick elsewhere.
[58:17.000 --> 58:20.000]  Hang on, we're about to go to break.
[58:20.000 --> 58:23.000]  Actually, we're about to go to our top-of-the-hour break.
[58:23.000 --> 58:38.000]  So if during the break, we might go to Logos Radio Network and check out some of our sponsors and patronize our sponsors.
[58:38.000 --> 58:43.000]  I don't know, buy something from our sponsors, help keep us on the air.
[58:43.000 --> 58:47.000]  Call it number 512-646-1984.
[58:47.000 --> 59:13.000]  We'll be right back.
[59:18.000 --> 59:24.000]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.000 --> 59:28.000]  growing in Christ, and how to build up the church.
[59:28.000 --> 59:34.000]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:34.000 --> 59:41.000]  call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:41.000 --> 59:45.000]  That's 888-551-0102.
[59:45.000 --> 59:50.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:50.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown,
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market.
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternatives.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:29.000]  Markets for the 11th of June, 2015 opened up with gold at $1,181.10 an ounce, silver $16 an ounce,
[01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:42.000]  Texas crude $61.43 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 229 U.S. currency.
[01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:48.000]  Today in history, Monday, June 11, 2001, Timothy McVeigh is executed by lethal injection
[01:00:48.000 --> 01:00:58.000]  for his role in the Oklahoma City bombing of April 19, 1995.
[01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  In recent news, Ali Amin, a 17-year-old from Manassas, Virginia, pleaded guilty in court today
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:06.000]  to charges of conspiring to help ISIS.
[01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:11.000]  Apparently he used his Twitter account and blog to provide instructions on how to send Bitcoin to the Islamic State.
[01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:15.000]  He also helped Reza and Nijad to travel to Syria to join them.
[01:01:15.000 --> 01:01:19.000]  This is the first time the United States has prosecuted a minor as an adult in such a case.
[01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:27.000]  He faces up to 15 years in prison when sentenced on August 28.
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:31.000]  The American Civil Liberties Union, representing Gavin Grimm, has filed complaints against
[01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:34.000]  Gloucester County School Board in Richmond, Virginia.
[01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:39.000]  The complaint states that Grimm, 16, was designated female at birth but as a male gender identity.
[01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  He has been diagnosed as having gender dysphoria, a medical condition characterized by distress
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:48.000]  stemming from conflict between a person's gender identity and the person's assigned sex at birth.
[01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:52.000]  Apparently he had used the communal restrooms without incident until the board,
[01:01:52.000 --> 01:01:56.000]  responding to complaints from local residents, adopted a policy in December
[01:01:56.000 --> 01:01:59.000]  requiring transgender students to use a private facility.
[01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:05.000]  The ACLU is suing to get him to be able to use them.
[01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:10.000]  The Lightsail Spacecraft, a privately funded space project by members of the Planetary Society,
[01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:17.000]  demonstrated how a tiny motor could unfurl four thin Mylar films into an area as big as a living room.
[01:02:17.000 --> 01:02:22.000]  What for, you ask? It is to practice a space propulsion technique known as solar sailing.
[01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:27.000]  The basic idea is to use the pressure of photons from the sun against a film to generate forward momentum.
[01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  Confirmation via a Lightsail selfie finally came in on Tuesday.
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  Project managers are trying to run other tests to put the spacecraft through
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:45.000]  before it succumbs to Earth's gravity and is pulled back into the atmosphere sometime this weekend.
[01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:48.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown is probably looking for sponsors.
[01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  If you have a product or a service that you'd like to advertise in the Lowdown, feel free to give us a call at 210-863-5617.
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:19.000]  This has been your Lowdown for June 11, 2015.
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:53.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:53.000 --> 01:03:57.000]  Randy Kelton, Rue of Our Radio, here with Jeff Cedric.
[01:03:57.000 --> 01:04:03.000]  You know, with the break we were talking about, Jeff was specifically referencing a case in Maryland
[01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:08.000]  where the Attorney General filed an amicus brief.
[01:04:08.000 --> 01:04:18.000]  And it was concerning a lender coming to the table without any real evidence of debt.
[01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:33.000]  And I've been noticing lately that attorney generals are intervening in cases from the capacity of amicus curiae,
[01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  more and more against the banks.
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  You know, if you've been listening a long time, when we started out, you know, we pretty well said,
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:47.000]  if you file a suit against the banks or if you fight a foreclosure, you're going to lose.
[01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:51.000]  The court's going to rule against you out of hand at every turn.
[01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:53.000]  You just have to expect that.
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:55.000]  That wasn't necessarily a problem.
[01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:58.000]  It was just a parameter.
[01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:07.000]  And over the intervening years, we see that, first we saw it gradually begin to change.
[01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  And now we're seeing it more and more.
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:17.000]  We're actually seeing public officials jumping into these arenas when they don't have to.
[01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  And that tells me that the politics is moving in our favor,
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:31.000]  that an attorney general feels like he's going to get lots more votes if he sticks his nose in this business.
[01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  We have a county clerk in South Carolina sued MERS accusing them of filing criminally fraudulent documents in their court.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  Now, I thought that was incredibly gutsy that they would take on the six major banks
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:06:05.000]  because the six major banks own MERS and accuse MERS of acting not just improperly but criminally.
[01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:11.000]  That tells me that the political winds are changing dramatically.
[01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:14.000]  And we've kind of exhausted that for the moment.
[01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  We've got a couple of callers.
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:20.000]  Just going to hang on because sometimes you have some really good insight.
[01:06:20.000 --> 01:06:24.000]  So we're going to go to Walt in New York. Hello, Walt.
[01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:27.000]  What do you have for us today?
[01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:29.000]  Hi, Randy. Nice meeting you, Jeff.
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:33.000]  I want to ask you a question about a possibility here, Randy.
[01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  Can we help legal people like you there also or you could help people across the country?
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:41.000]  Here's the issue.
[01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:47.000]  I know in some court cases, maybe in jails and other places, the communication between the judge...
[01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:51.000]  Hold on, Walt. I'm having a little trouble understanding.
[01:06:51.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  Your mic is distorted. Can you back it away from your mouth a little bit?
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:06:59.000]  Well, I took the speaker off. Is it better now?
[01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:01.000]  Oh, much better.
[01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  Okay. I'm sorry.
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:08.000]  Okay. And you're speaking a little bit faster than I can listen.
[01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:10.000]  All right.
[01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:19.000]  Today, especially in jails and other places, there is correspondence or communication between the judge
[01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:23.000]  and the litigant on a TV screen.
[01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  So what law would prevent a litigant around the country in courts to have counsel from legal counsel people
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:39.000]  across the country via a cell phone in the courtroom?
[01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:45.000]  Now, before you answer, Randy, let me tell you, in New York State, where I live, there's a law passed.
[01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  Now you can go into the courtroom and record audio and also the camera.
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:08:00.000]  So if you can have that now in the courtroom, you've got to put in a written letter first to the judge
[01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:01.000]  before you go to court.
[01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:08.000]  But still, what law would prevent someone from having a cell phone in the courtroom, let's say I did,
[01:08:08.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  and I asked you to be my legal counsel over the phone from Texas, why couldn't we do this lawfully in the courtroom today?
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  I don't know of anything lawfully preventing it.
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  It is the judges who prevent it under their general powers to maintain decorum in the courtroom.
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:47.000]  They claim that it would also beg the question of whether or not you were authorized to practice law in New York.
[01:08:47.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  Well, that's a separate issue, what constitutes the practice of law.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  I just had someone bring up, I have a friend that's taking on the family courts,
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:05.000]  and she's been charged with the unauthorized practice of law.
[01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  And I asked her, did the unauthorized practice of law committee, we have a committee for that in Texas,
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  accuse you of holding yourself out as a lawyer in a property damage or personal injury case?
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:27.000]  And she said no, then you need to file criminal charges against the commission.
[01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:39.000]  Because in Texas, unauthorized practice of law 38.123 makes it a crime for a person to hold themselves out
[01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:49.000]  as an attorney in a personal injury or property damage case, period.
[01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:51.000]  Nothing else constitutes.
[01:09:51.000 --> 01:09:53.000]  You were across state lines.
[01:09:53.000 --> 01:10:01.000]  Well, what constitutes the practice of law in another state?
[01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:09.000]  Well, Randy, I have in this, I sent you a little booklet,
[01:10:09.000 --> 01:10:11.000]  Conalog Grand Jury booklet.
[01:10:11.000 --> 01:10:16.000]  If you read it in there, you'll see a section about practicing law in this country.
[01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:24.000]  Several, I believe, Supreme Court cases have already adjudicated matters saying you don't,
[01:10:24.000 --> 01:10:31.000]  no one can prevent you from the right of representing someone in the court.
[01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:34.000]  You cannot take away that right.
[01:10:34.000 --> 01:10:35.000]  Okay, hold on.
[01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:36.000]  That's in the Fed.
[01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:38.000]  You have a right to do it.
[01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  Okay, there is no unauthorized practice of law in the Fed so far as I know.
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:49.000]  But states have enacted specific statutes, and like Texas has one.
[01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:56.000]  But the Texas statute is very, very focused.
[01:10:56.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  It only goes to personal injury or property damage.
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:07.000]  So that would be my question for what would constitute a legal practice of law in a given state.
[01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:15.000]  But what's pretty well protected, just because somebody's giving you legal advice on the phone,
[01:11:15.000 --> 01:11:20.000]  that's not practicing law unless you're holding yourself out as an attorney.
[01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:27.000]  And in some cases, I think Colorado, you have to be paid as an attorney.
[01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  But that's why I asked the question.
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:35.000]  In the state you're in, what constitutes an unauthorized practice of law?
[01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:39.000]  Walt, do you know what that is in New York?
[01:11:39.000 --> 01:11:41.000]  No.
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  So it might be worth checking, but Jeff, I would think that giving someone your opinion
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:59.000]  and acting as counsel to someone does not necessarily constitute a practice of law.
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:01.000]  Well, I understand that.
[01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:05.000]  But then there's what the courts say and what the courts do.
[01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  And it's not always the same as what's in black letter law.
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:14.000]  That is always the case.
[01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:21.000]  So where do we draw a line?
[01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  When do we yield to what the court wants?
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:34.000]  And when do we hold the court to its statutory authority?
[01:12:34.000 --> 01:12:41.000]  Well, you got the problem of court discretion.
[01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:46.000]  Well, yeah, but then the court has the problem of 18 U.S. Code 242,
[01:12:46.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  which has been codified into most every state code.
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:53.000]  Okay.
[01:12:53.000 --> 01:12:56.000]  And that is the court.
[01:12:56.000 --> 01:12:58.000]  Go ahead.
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:03.000]  I was going to say, Randy, as far as your caller is concerned, we can't give it.
[01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:07.000]  I don't think it's possible to give him any kind of definite and definitive answer.
[01:13:07.000 --> 01:13:09.000]  No, I don't think so either.
[01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:15.000]  You'd have to know specifically state law, what the state law says about it.
[01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:23.000]  But I have been in cases where people have called on someone on the phone for advice
[01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:27.000]  and the court has allowed it.
[01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:35.000]  So that's not exactly unprecedented and it's certainly within the discretion of the court.
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:43.000]  And, you know, while you were saying that, I was thinking about Google Glass.
[01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  You put on Google Glass and you can have a lawyer in your ear.
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:55.000]  You put in a Bluetooth and you can have a lawyer in your ear.
[01:13:55.000 --> 01:14:02.000]  And I can hardly see where the court could construe that a Bluetooth would interfere
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:07.000]  with the operation of the court.
[01:14:07.000 --> 01:14:08.000]  Okay.
[01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:09.000]  Did we interrupt you, Walt?
[01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:12.000]  Did you have – was that your primary issue?
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:21.000]  Can a – since you can videotape the courtroom, can you put your lawyer on the phone in?
[01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:25.000]  Right, I got one more comment. I just thought of it.
[01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:28.000]  There is a case, it's called Marbury versus somebody.
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:30.000]  It's a Supreme Court case.
[01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:35.000]  Marbury Patchman, is that it?
[01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:42.000]  No, that's – I can look it up and call you back, but here's what it said.
[01:14:42.000 --> 01:14:46.000]  The Constitution, even though I know they don't go by it, but they tell you they do.
[01:14:46.000 --> 01:14:48.000]  They swear I know if they'll pull it.
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:51.000]  Here's the issue that I'm trying to get at here.
[01:14:51.000 --> 01:14:54.000]  I think it's Ward Marbury.
[01:14:54.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  Okay, go ahead.
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  No, I'll get the information called back after I'm done with this call with you,
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:01.000]  because I got it right here in the booklet.
[01:15:01.000 --> 01:15:06.000]  But what I'm trying to say, Randy, and Jeff, is this.
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  The Sixth Amendment says we have a right to counsel.
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  As I say in there, that you can't have it on the phone or whatever, just as you do.
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:21.000]  So the Marbury Supreme Court case says any state statute or any law
[01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:25.000]  that violates the Constitution is non-void.
[01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  It's void.
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:27.000]  It's Marbury Madison.
[01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:31.000]  That could be it, Randy.
[01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  That's it, Randy.
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:36.000]  Pardon me?
[01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:38.000]  That's it.
[01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:39.000]  Yeah, Marbury Madison.
[01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  It's the Marbury petition to the Supreme Court to force the new Secretary of State,
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:55.000]  James Madison, to deliver the documents, the court with John Marshall and Chief Justice.
[01:15:55.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  Okay, it's Marbury Madison.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:15:59.000]  We both do the case.
[01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  We just couldn't remember the specifics.
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:04.000]  Okay, go ahead, Walt.
[01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:07.000]  I kind of lost what you were saying about it.
[01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:14.000]  Well, okay, what I'm saying is if someone has a right to counsel in the Sixth Amendment
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:17.000]  of the Constitution, it doesn't say you can't have a cell phone
[01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:21.000]  or electronic communication with your counsel.
[01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:27.000]  Okay, yeah, and that goes back to 18 U.S. Code 242.
[01:16:27.000 --> 01:16:32.000]  A judge may only do what he's specifically authorized to do.
[01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:36.000]  So if he's not authorized to tell you you can't do something, he can't do that.
[01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:39.000]  Hang on, Randy Kelton.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:45.000]  Rule of Law Radio, our calling number is 512-646-1984.
[01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:47.000]  Give us a call.
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:49.000]  We keep the call lines open all night.
[01:16:49.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:04.000]  Chances are you've heard of My Magic Mud, but have you used it?
[01:17:04.000 --> 01:17:07.000]  Thousands of people are blown away by the clean and healthy feeling
[01:17:07.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  they experience after just one use.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:13.000]  Here's what Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books, has to say about the product.
[01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:16.000]  Hey, everybody, this is Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books.
[01:17:16.000 --> 01:17:18.000]  Just want to tell everybody about My Magic Mud.
[01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:21.000]  I use the product, and it makes my teeth feel clean and healthy.
[01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:23.000]  I think it makes them stronger.
[01:17:23.000 --> 01:17:25.000]  I've got lots of customers that come in and say the same thing.
[01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  You can pick yours up at Brave New Books.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:33.000]  If that wasn't enough, Dr. Griffin Cole, DDS, who's been featured on the Alex Jones show, loves it too.
[01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:37.000]  Hi, I'm Dr. Griffin Cole, and I've got to tell you, I really love this Magic Mud product.
[01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:41.000]  Because charcoal is so absorbent, it's very effective at taking off all the sticky plaque
[01:17:41.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  and debris that gets stuck on our teeth every day.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  I highly recommend My Magic Mud.
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  If you haven't yet experienced My Magic Mud,
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  it's never too late to brighten your smile and strengthen your teeth.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000]  Get your jar of My Magic Mud today at Brave New Books,
[01:17:54.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  located at 1904 Guadalupe Street, or order online today at MyMagicMud.com.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:19.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular longevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polynburps.
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:36.000]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods,
[01:18:36.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:47.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:55.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:18:55.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullying.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:19:25.000 --> 01:19:36.000]  Well, you ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:40.000]  Okay, we are back. We're into counting.
[01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:48.000]  We're on radio here with Jeff in Maryland and we're going to Ken Magnuson.
[01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:50.000]  Hello, Mr. Ken.
[01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:54.000]  You're pronouncing my name wrong again.
[01:19:54.000 --> 01:19:59.000]  Oh, I did. Oops.
[01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:02.000]  What do you have for us tonight?
[01:20:02.000 --> 01:20:11.000]  Well, there's some interesting things going on with regards to the new electronic filing in Texas.
[01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:17.000]  The electronic filing process, which is required in a lot of the district courts, absolutely,
[01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:25.000]  and in the appellate courts is voluntary, but there's some rules that are idiosyncratic to the problem.
[01:20:25.000 --> 01:20:26.000]  Okay, hold on.
[01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:30.000]  Ken, you're speaking here to Texas specifically, right?
[01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:32.000]  Okay. Yes, right.
[01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  Okay.
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:41.000]  It wouldn't surprise me though that there's parallel issues elsewhere since the courts are really obnoxious
[01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  about trying to eliminate pro se litigants from pleading.
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:53.000]  So the rules that they've put in place have set up a process by which you're either a law firm
[01:20:53.000 --> 01:21:01.000]  and you have access to resources such as high-end Adobe or some sort of program to create PDF files.
[01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:07.000]  One of the things in the appellate court we've just stumbled across was that they're requiring that the
[01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  files be text searchable, however, the district clerks that are preparing the clerk's record
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:22.000]  and the court reporters that are presenting the court reporter's record are not giving the files
[01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  to the litigants in text searchable format.
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:30.000]  They're giving it to you in a graphic PDF.
[01:21:30.000 --> 01:21:34.000]  So now you have to convert it, and if anybody's been out there and used OCR software
[01:21:34.000 --> 01:21:42.000]  and you see what a mess it will turn a document that's not cleanly scanned, it just totally ruins it.
[01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  So I don't know how you can scan the document and end up with a reasonable facsimile of what was
[01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:51.000]  originally filed with the court.
[01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:55.000]  So I think this is an impediment, and I think they're doing it deliberately.
[01:21:55.000 --> 01:21:57.000]  Wait, wait, hold on a second, Ken.
[01:21:57.000 --> 01:21:58.000]  Yes.
[01:21:58.000 --> 01:22:02.000]  You are getting some pretty serious feedback.
[01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:11.000]  If you're using a headset with earbuds, so with little pads, can you turn your headset down
[01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  so that the sound doesn't leak out back to the mic?
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:18.000]  It may be that I need to call back.
[01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:26.000]  I'm in a location where I'm getting a lot of side noise too, so why don't I give a call back in about 15 minutes?
[01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:28.000]  Okay, that'll work.
[01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:29.000]  Okay, thank you.
[01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  Okay, thank you.
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  Now we're going to go to Stephen in Idaho.
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:44.000]  Hello, Stephen.
[01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:50.000]  Stephen, are you talking to me or is that a radio in the background?
[01:22:50.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  I'm sorry, I didn't catch you.
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:23:06.000]  Wait a minute, did you actually cause me to send some other radio talk show host voice out over my station?
[01:23:06.000 --> 01:23:10.000]  Oh, I'm crushed.
[01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:11.000]  I'm just kidding.
[01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:13.000]  Okay.
[01:23:13.000 --> 01:23:14.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:17.000]  I was calling back from last night.
[01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  I don't know if you remember me.
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  I was talking about...
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:26.000]  Yes, I do, but for everybody else, kind of bring this back up to speed.
[01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  Well, I was trying to get a non-contact order and the city attorney says that it doesn't meet the level.
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:39.000]  Okay, hold on.
[01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:59.000]  Stephen had an assault and in Idaho, you can petition for a restraining order and the restraining order goes to the discretion of the court unless there has been a physical assault,
[01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:06.000]  in which case a restraining order or a protective order is statutory.
[01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:08.000]  Is that correct, Stephen?
[01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  That's how I understand it.
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:21.000]  Okay, and you requested after an assault, you requested a statutory protective order and the prosecutor refused to petition for one?
[01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  Exactly.
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  Okay, so this is basically where we're at.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:43.000]  And you said to look into the Idaho Code for an official that misuses their authority or acting outside their limited authority and corresponding to the Civil Rights Act of, was it 1871?
[01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  No, I'm talking about 18 U.S. Code 242 and here specifically the portion of 18 U.S. Code 242 that goes to misfeasance in office.
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  If a public official fails to perform a duty they're required to perform and in the process denies a citizen full of rights to enjoy a middle right, that's a crime. And every state has a codification of 18 U.S. Code 242 in some form or another.
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:19.000]  In Texas, it's 39.03 Pena Code.
[01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  So did you find that in Idaho law?
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:32.000]  I didn't. That's the reason why I was calling. All I found was a Civil Rights Act violation.
[01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:43.000]  On the other side, if a private individual did something wrong, but not the official doing something wrong.
[01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:47.000]  But is there any chance you could look?
[01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:50.000]  Okay, let me read one to you.
[01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:55.000]  Idaho, let's see, Idaho, that's banks and banking.
[01:25:55.000 --> 01:26:03.000]  I found an official misconduct. They did a search for official misconduct.
[01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:10.000]  Title 51, Notice of Public Commissioners, Chapter 1, Idaho No Republic Act.
[01:26:10.000 --> 01:26:13.000]  I'll find it here in a second.
[01:26:13.000 --> 01:26:21.000]  Ethics in government, official misconduct. There has to be an act there. I thought I could find it quickly.
[01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:25.000]  But I didn't.
[01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  Okay, go ahead. I didn't find it as quickly as I thought I would.
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  Yeah, I didn't either. That's why I was calling back. Is there any way of searching the code rather than just going through title and chapter by chapter?
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:51.000]  Well, generally, you could just do an Internet search.
[01:26:51.000 --> 01:26:54.000]  Can I suggest something, Randy?
[01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  Absolutely.
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:27:02.000]  Use Google.
[01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:20.000]  You may have to change the question around several times in order to find it, but chances are real good you will find it with Google.
[01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  Are you still there, sir?
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  I keep going. It keeps taking me to notaries and commissioners of deeds.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  I'm looking for – I did a search for official misconduct. Let me try official oppression.
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:48.000]  In Texas, we have two. We have official misconduct and official oppression.
[01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:53.000]  Are we looking for a restraining order?
[01:27:53.000 --> 01:28:07.000]  Well, what we're looking for is apparently in Idaho code, when there has been an assault, a protective order is statutory.
[01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:14.000]  It's not up to the discretion of the course. If you request one, they're required to give it to you.
[01:28:14.000 --> 01:28:20.000]  He requested one, and the prosecuting attorney refused to petition for one.
[01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:27.000]  So now we're looking at hammering him for fiscal oppression.
[01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  Okay. Well, how about if we do this? How about going over to womenslaw.org and send a query there?
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  Very good idea, because it's purely the women that are looking for the protective order.
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:49.000]  Yeah.
[01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:51.000]  That's not bad for an old guy.
[01:28:51.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  Protective orders are issued by a judge in a state civil court and require one person to stop harming another.
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:07.000]  That's the first – I did a search for a restraining order, comma, Idaho, and that was the first item on the search,
[01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:17.000]  and it was listed under womenslaw.org. So go to them. Call them up. Ask them.
[01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:20.000]  Did you get that, Stefan?
[01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  Yeah, I have done that. They act like they're – almost have a battered mentality themselves.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  Probably because you're a man. Get your girlfriend or your wife to ask them.
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:43.000]  Possibly.
[01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  Okay.
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  I just can't find any code in Idaho that corresponds to that official oppression.
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  I haven't found any. Hang on, we're about to go to break.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  Amanda Kelton, Lou of La Radio. Call it number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:11.000]  Are you going bald? Don't worry, I'm not peddling another miracle product, but scientists may have stumbled on a legitimate cure for hair loss.
[01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. In a moment, I'll come back and tell you what it is.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:21.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:48.000]  Treating baldness is a $1 billion a year industry.
[01:30:48.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  Yet despite all that money, there are only a few legitimate medications that work.
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:58.000]  And none actually cures baldness. But during a recent study on how stress affects our intestines,
[01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:04.000]  UCLA researchers identified a chemical compound that could end hair loss and even regrow hair.
[01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  The compound A, stress, and B blocks the hormone that our bodies produce when we're under stress.
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:15.000]  Mice that receive the stress hormone and lost their hair were later injected with A, stress, and B for five days.
[01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:20.000]  In less than three months, all of the mice re-grew all of their hair.
[01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:22.000]  Hair Club for Men Lookout.
[01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:27.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow force responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm the father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:03.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:59.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:01.000]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:11.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosradioNetwork.com.
[01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:48.000]  The wicked come with temptation. They're trying to buy the whole place.
[01:33:48.000 --> 01:34:01.000]  Hey, we are back. Randy Kelton, Blue Glow Radio, and we're here with Jeff from Maryland, and we're talking to Stefan in Idaho.
[01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:15.000]  Okay, Stefan, I think Jeff's idea was probably the best sketchy girlfriend or something to call and see if you can't get some relief, get some advice that way.
[01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  But probably rather than depend on the prosecutor to get your restraining order for your protective order, you should file with the court for a protective order.
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  Are you there?
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:48.000]  Yeah, I am. Montana has a really good official misconduct code. Can you use another state? I was wondering if the state doesn't have it.
[01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:53.000]  You can always use 18 U.S. Code 242.
[01:34:53.000 --> 01:34:54.000]  Okay.
[01:34:54.000 --> 01:35:09.000]  Because this particular statute, it goes to due process. And so if you can't find it specifically in Idaho code, you can pull in the federal code.
[01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:19.000]  Yeah, because Montana has one that, you know, is perfect, so you'd think that one state would have it.
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  But you could actually bring it in under full faith and credit if you can't find a law addressing an issue in your state.
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:46.000]  And the legislature of another state has addressed that issue. Under full faith and credit, the states will tend to trust the legislature of another state, so you can bring in a statute under full faith and credit.
[01:35:46.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  But that tends to be advisory, and what is not advisory are the federal statutes, federal due process.
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:20.000]  Right. But to get your restraining order, the protective order, I would just look online for Idaho protective order and pull up one and use the same format and just adjust it to your case and file it with the court.
[01:36:20.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  Well, that's the reason the court has supposedly said that they won't give me one, you know.
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  Well, then petition the Court of Appeals for a writ of mandamus.
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:54.000]  What a writ of mandamus is, is it's you ask a higher court to mandate to a lower court that they do something that the law requires them to do.
[01:36:54.000 --> 01:37:10.000]  Okay. Is there any chance I can send you a document that shows in my mind that they're totally outside their actions? I don't know if I'm making sense.
[01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:25.000]  But you can send it to me, but you can prepare it. That won't help much. You can prepare the document probably better than I can because it's harder for me to search Idaho law because I'm in Texas.
[01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:35.000]  If I do a search in Texas, I get very little Idaho law. It wants to bring you back to Texas law, what's local. You'll get better hits in Idaho.
[01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:41.000]  So do a search for writ of mandamus, a restraining order.
[01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:54.000]  All right. Yeah, I don't use Lexus or Wesley or hardly ever anymore. I use Google or I use the start page or one of the search engines. I get better results.
[01:37:54.000 --> 01:38:05.000]  So just go on any search engine and do a search for Idaho restraining order mandamus.
[01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:15.000]  Okay. And you're very likely to find a mandamus or asking the higher court to order a lower court to issue a restraining order.
[01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:27.000]  You just kind of adjust it to fit your case. Okay. Okay. Good luck, Stefan. Okay. Thanks a lot.
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:38.000]  Okay. Now we're going to go to Arlo in Texas. Hello, Arlo. Hello there. Can you hear me? Yes, I can.
[01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:51.000]  All right. Great. I was just calling in real quick, Paul, because I heard it mentioned about how difficult it can be to take PDF legal documents and have them in a Word searchable format like Word.
[01:38:51.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  And just a quick tip, there are companies like ajprocessing.com where for like a dollar per page, not only do they convert it for you so you don't have to buy the $500 software,
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  they'll convert it for you and have a human go through it to clean it up and make it all nice and presentable.
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:19.000]  And so it's A is in alpha, J is in processing.com. You can just upload it there. So I just wanted to let you know.
[01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  And there might be apps or other websites that do that too, but that's what we use. I convert a lot of legal documents from PDF to Word.
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  Ajprocessing.com. Ken was supposed to call back in. He did. And then he dropped off again. So if he calls back, I'll get that to him.
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:42.000]  Okay. All right. Very good. Okay. Thank you very much.
[01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  Thank you so much.
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:51.000]  Okay. Now we're going to go to Tom in Texas. Hello, Tom.
[01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:55.000]  Hey, Ken. Can you hear me okay?
[01:39:55.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  I can hear you. You've got a lot of background noise though.
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:11.000]  Okay. I'm traveling, but I'm not on Bluetooth. Anyways, I talked to you a few weeks earlier regarding a parking ticket where the
[01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:21.000]  deputy had issued a citation at 730 at night on September 11th and had it notarized the same date.
[01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:33.000]  However, the woman whose notary appeared on the document had actually gotten off work at 5 p.m. that day and was off work the next day.
[01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  And so I pulled a sampling of cases from that September and come to find out that she asked her notary appeared five or six times on all the
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:50.000]  documents from September 12th and she was off that day.
[01:40:50.000 --> 01:40:52.000]  Wonderful.
[01:40:52.000 --> 01:41:10.000]  Yeah. Now they did dismiss my case yesterday, but I did not put in my motion to quash anything about the, I guess, the errant notaries.
[01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:18.000]  I wanted to save that in case I went to trial and I wanted to spring it on the deputy.
[01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:29.000]  However, I have done a, I have a public information request in for her notary logbook for the month of September of 2014.
[01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:40.000]  And so with that, I'm going to file a complaint with the Secretary of State, maybe a civil action against her and a criminal complaint
[01:41:40.000 --> 01:41:53.000]  against the deputy because the case I pulled on him, there's at least 10 notaries that occurred after 5 p.m.
[01:41:53.000 --> 01:41:57.000]  for the same date of this issued citation.
[01:41:57.000 --> 01:42:04.000]  And so that could be also construed as a fraud as well as aggravated burglary.
[01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:08.000]  Well, that would primarily be tampering.
[01:42:08.000 --> 01:42:13.000]  When you said fraud, I knew Jeff was going to step in on this one.
[01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  Jeff.
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:19.000]  Can I take a page from your book, Randy?
[01:42:19.000 --> 01:42:23.000]  Absolutely.
[01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:32.000]  Do an open records request in the accounting department for her pay records for that week.
[01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:35.000]  I'll repeat that please.
[01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:46.000]  Do an open records request of the accounting department for her pay records for that week.
[01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  Okay.
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:55.000]  I did get a public information request response to her actual work hours for that two week period.
[01:42:55.000 --> 01:42:59.000]  And she worked 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday.
[01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  And all these notaries occurred after 5 p.m. and on weekends.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:13.000]  If you've got that open records request, you've got the evidence you need.
[01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  I like it when somebody dots all the I's.
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:20.000]  Yep.
[01:43:20.000 --> 01:43:25.000]  But the prosecutor, I watched her tell the deputy to leave.
[01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:29.000]  And then a few minutes later she came and told him my case was dismissed.
[01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:33.000]  And she said it's not because of anything that you filed.
[01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:42.000]  It's because it says driver was not present so he did not see you get out of the car.
[01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  What do you care?
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:46.000]  Yeah.
[01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:47.000]  Okay.
[01:43:47.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  Hang on.
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  We're about to go to break.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  Sounds like you're having too much fun with this.
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:55.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:55.000 --> 01:43:58.000]  We'll call it number 512-646-1984.
[01:43:58.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  Do you feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Sorry.
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  What?
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:15.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt.
[01:44:15.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  And like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:29.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity.
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  But there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:50.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  Side effects when using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:05.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:05.000 --> 01:46:22.000]  Thank you very much.
[01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:46.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:46.000 --> 01:46:54.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio here with Jeff Cedric, and we're talking to Tom in Texas.
[01:46:54.000 --> 01:47:00.000]  We were discussing over the break how we thought you were having way too much fun with this.
[01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:04.000]  Oh, Tom, what county are you in?
[01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:07.000]  Well, this is occurring in Harris County.
[01:47:07.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  Now, my question for you is, should I take all this documentation
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:21.000]  and go ahead and fill out a criminal complaint on both the deputy and the notary
[01:47:21.000 --> 01:47:25.000]  who works for the constable department in the records division,
[01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:31.000]  and try to give it to the district attorney, or should I try to get in to see the grand jury myself?
[01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:46.000]  I would look to go to the grand jury, but what you might try is go to a grand jury in a different county.
[01:47:46.000 --> 01:47:50.000]  Oh, it doesn't have to be the Harris County grand jury?
[01:47:50.000 --> 01:48:01.000]  I recently filed criminal charges against the Dallas County district attorney, two Dallas County judges,
[01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:05.000]  a couple of bailiffs and various in the sundry, other officials.
[01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:10.000]  I filed them with the Tarrant County grand jury.
[01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:14.000]  I took the law to the Tarrant County district attorney.
[01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:25.000]  We actually have a district attorney in Texas who, when you show her the law, she follows it.
[01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:31.000]  And I showed her the law that said when a prosecuting attorney is made known in any manner
[01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  that a public official has violated the law relating to her office,
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:40.000]  she shall reduce the complaint when information is submitted to the grand jury.
[01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:52.000]  And what that says is a prosecutor has no discretion concerning a complaint against a public official.
[01:48:52.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  And then I showed her what wasn't in the law.
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:04.000]  A district judge appoints a grand jury or consecrates a grand jury.
[01:49:04.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  He doesn't actually appoint, they have a procedure for that.
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:10.000]  But a district judge presides over the process.
[01:49:10.000 --> 01:49:14.000]  And that district judge is elected as a state judge.
[01:49:14.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  And they used to travel around the state when we had circuit courts.
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:23.000]  But now we have such a large population, we no longer have circuit judges.
[01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  So they restricted all of the district judges to a specific venue.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:38.000]  Then it is that judge with a venue restriction that impanels the grand jury.
[01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:51.000]  But I can find no law that likewise restricts the jurisdiction of a grand jury to any particular venue.
[01:49:51.000 --> 01:50:00.000]  And I went to the district attorney and told her that if you can find some statute or case law
[01:50:00.000 --> 01:50:08.000]  that restricts the venue of a grand jury, bring it to me and I will go somewhere else with my complaints.
[01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  If not, I will come down and file these complaints with the grand jury myself
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:24.000]  in accordance with my authority to do so as granted under 20.09 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,
[01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:31.000]  which says grand jury shall investigate into all crimes liable to indictment
[01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:41.000]  that come by way of any grand jurors personal knowledge by way of the prosecuting attorney or any credible person.
[01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  I am a person under law.
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:49.000]  I am above the age of 18 and have never been convicted of a felony.
[01:50:49.000 --> 01:50:54.000]  Therefore, I am by statute a credible person.
[01:50:54.000 --> 01:51:01.000]  So this is tacit authorization for me to give notice to the grand jury.
[01:51:01.000 --> 01:51:07.000]  But in fact, I don't need authorization to give notice to the grand jury
[01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:13.000]  as nothing in law forbids me to give notice to the grand jury.
[01:51:13.000 --> 01:51:20.000]  And I took this to the prosecutor and they looked into it and they agreed with me.
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:25.000]  I brought the complaint against the Dallas County District Attorney to Tarrant County.
[01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  The Tarrant County District Attorney stood aside and I gave it to the grand jury bailiff.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:37.000]  I've since filed a complaint against a judge, a really nitpicking complaint.
[01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:40.000]  Nobody interfered with me.
[01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:46.000]  So you can use Tarrant County as precedence.
[01:51:46.000 --> 01:51:54.000]  If you go to a small county and the prosecutor says, well, you know, I don't know.
[01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  We never did anything like this.
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:52:07.000]  Call Sharon Wilson, 12-year district judge, now Tarrant County District Attorney, and ask her about this issue.
[01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:15.000]  If we start filing complaints against public officials from one county in a separate county,
[01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:21.000]  that really gets these guys hopping and jumping.
[01:52:21.000 --> 01:52:26.000]  It's while their local buddies and good old boy system may protect them,
[01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:32.000]  they can't count on another county likewise protecting them.
[01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:34.000]  Does that sound like a fun time?
[01:52:34.000 --> 01:52:37.000]  It does sound like a fun time. Now let me ask you this.
[01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:42.000]  Now this happened in the records division, this notary.
[01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:50.000]  It seems like they've all got this notary's stamp, seal, and the stamp of her signature.
[01:52:50.000 --> 01:52:57.000]  And apparently it's going on with the knowledge and consent of the lieutenant over the records division.
[01:52:57.000 --> 01:53:00.000]  Should I include him in this formal complaint?
[01:53:00.000 --> 01:53:05.000]  Oh, no. Oh, absolutely not.
[01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:09.000]  That's just a presumption.
[01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:20.000]  What you know is that this notary's signature is on this document and this notary wasn't working on this day.
[01:53:20.000 --> 01:53:23.000]  Whoever else might have done whatever we don't know.
[01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  And here's the deal.
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:36.000]  You want this notary to throw the mayor under the bus or whoever told her to do this,
[01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:39.000]  you want her to throw that person under the bus.
[01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:41.000]  Ah, okay.
[01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:49.000]  It is just so much fun when you get these guys clawing at each other to try to keep themselves out of trouble.
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:52.000]  We have a court reporter who didn't show up for a hearing
[01:53:52.000 --> 01:54:00.000]  and the judge had ordered the prosecuting attorney, or this was an assistant district attorney in the Civil Division,
[01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:04.000]  to tell the court reporter to be there.
[01:54:04.000 --> 01:54:06.000]  The court reporter didn't show up.
[01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:09.000]  We filed a complaint against the court reporter.
[01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  She had to go down to Austin from Fort Worth, it's 200 miles to a hearing.
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:23.000]  And she swore that the prosecutor never told her that the prosecutor drove down to the hearing and swore that she did.
[01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:26.000]  So we got these two fighting with each other.
[01:54:26.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  Oh, wonderful.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:36.000]  And what that demonstrates is judges and lawyers will protect each other.
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:40.000]  Everybody else they'll throw under the bus.
[01:54:40.000 --> 01:54:46.000]  So get them throwing each other under the bus.
[01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:55.000]  And when she says that I was just following policy, what's your question?
[01:54:55.000 --> 01:55:00.000]  Who set the policy?
[01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:06.000]  Who set the policy now becomes respondee at Superior Court.
[01:55:06.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  Ah, okay.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:11.000]  It's just kind of working the routine on them.
[01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:16.000]  You want it so that whatever they do, you sting them.
[01:55:16.000 --> 01:55:18.000]  They go this way, you sting them.
[01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:20.000]  They go that way, you sting them.
[01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:25.000]  So everything they do works in your favor.
[01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:31.000]  So now there's other deputies involved from other cases that are not, you know, mine,
[01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:40.000]  but they are on the same date and the timeframe when this novery was done, should I include these deputies in the criminal complaint also?
[01:55:40.000 --> 01:55:42.000]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:54.000]  Are you saying that this particular act was a predicate act in furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy?
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:56.000]  What do you think about that, Jess?
[01:55:56.000 --> 01:56:03.000]  I'm saying that they have her sense and it appears even when she's not at work.
[01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:04.000]  No, hold on, Tom.
[01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  I was going somewhere very specific.
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:11.000]  Jeff, you there?
[01:56:11.000 --> 01:56:12.000]  I am.
[01:56:12.000 --> 01:56:14.000]  Okay.
[01:56:14.000 --> 01:56:18.000]  It appears in terms of our favorite four-letter word.
[01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:20.000]  Exactly.
[01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:26.000]  Predicate acts in furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy.
[01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:27.000]  Okay.
[01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:36.000]  So he's going to have to establish an enterprise under 1961, and I suspect, and I don't know that this is true,
[01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:49.000]  but I suspect his criminal complaint is going to be 1962, the extortion is seen through the eyes of Rico, attempting to collect a non-existent debt.
[01:56:49.000 --> 01:57:05.000]  No, we have a guy from, a senator from Missouri pass the Freedom Something Act that made it a specific crime for a municipality
[01:57:05.000 --> 01:57:14.000]  to use enforcement of municipal codes or traffic laws as a source of income.
[01:57:14.000 --> 01:57:27.000]  That goes directly to this, where they're using the traffic code as a source of income, and that's the enterprise,
[01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:33.000]  and they're committing predicate acts in furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy.
[01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:36.000]  You got where that goes to, Tom?
[01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:38.000]  Yeah, I'm starting to understand.
[01:57:38.000 --> 01:57:39.000]  That light's coming on.
[01:57:39.000 --> 01:57:40.000]  Okay.
[01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:44.000]  So we're talking about Rico here.
[01:57:44.000 --> 01:57:46.000]  Right, I understand.
[01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:52.000]  And that gets him really, really excited.
[01:57:52.000 --> 01:57:55.000]  So you can have a lot of fun with this.
[01:57:55.000 --> 01:57:57.000]  Go ahead.
[01:57:57.000 --> 01:58:06.000]  I'm going to ask you, what is the opposite of exaggerating?
[01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:13.000]  I think getting excited is very much an understatement.
[01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  I believe that.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  Should I collect more evidence?
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:23.000]  Oh, absolutely, and that's the fun part.
[01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  And let us address that when we come back on the other side.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  Addressing, collecting evidence is so much fun.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:33.000]  Hang on, we're about to go to the top of the hour break.
[01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:37.000]  Randy Kelton, Wheel of Law Radio, here with Jeff Cedric.
[01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:40.000]  I call it number 512-646-1984.
[01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:46.000]  Over the long break, go visit our sponsors and help support this station,
[01:58:46.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  and by all means donate to Randy's group.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:54.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[01:58:54.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:02.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:59:02.000 --> 01:59:07.000]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:07.000 --> 01:59:09.000]  Enter the Recovery Version.
[01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:13.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:59:13.000 --> 01:59:18.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.000 --> 01:59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[01:59:22.000 --> 01:59:28.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free Recovery Version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:44.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102,
[01:59:44.000 --> 01:59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:48.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:51.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.