ROL_2013-08-12_16k.timecode

[00:27.000 --> 00:37.000]  Support for The Liberty Beat comes from Carmacazi Productions, the production house bringing you solitude in the show, specializing in high quality audio recording and video production for the Liberty movement.
[00:37.000 --> 00:48.000]  Online at Carmacazi.tv, and from Central Texas Gunworks, CHL courses, self-defense training, and firearm sales. Online at CentralTexasGunworks.com.
[00:48.000 --> 01:00.000]  And now the news. A federal judge has ruled that the New York City Police Department's heavily criticized stop and frisk approach to crime fighting is unconstitutional, the New York Times reported today.
[01:00.000 --> 01:12.000]  The ruling by Judge Shira A. Shindlin is the latest blow to the policy, which data suggests has not been effective in actually preventing shootings in the city while being decried for targeting black and Latino men almost exclusively.
[01:12.000 --> 01:27.000]  In her decision, Shindlin determined that the policy violated both the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment and appointed an outside counsel to monitor the department and make sure it moves further into compliance in the future.
[01:27.000 --> 01:34.000]  Elora Gellerson of Brooklyn, Maine is facing criticism and punishment by Maine health officials for her choice of baby formula.
[01:34.000 --> 01:42.000]  Gellerson was reported to the Department of Health and Human Services after informing her doctor that she had been feeding her son Carson a homemade formula using goat's milk.
[01:42.000 --> 01:47.000]  She says the state came to her house and threatened to take away her child if she did not follow her doctor's orders.
[01:47.000 --> 01:58.000]  Since the incident, Elora has complied with all of the mandates from the Department of Health and Human Services, but the state has not dropped the harassment.
[01:58.000 --> 02:11.000]  Radley Balko of the Huffington Post reported on some shocking numbers recently. According to the FBI, in 2011, there were 3,991.1 arrests for every 100,000 people living in America.
[02:11.000 --> 02:21.000]  That means over the course of a single year, 1 in 25 Americans was arrested. Out of that 1 in 25, more people were arrested for drug crimes than any other class of crimes.
[02:21.000 --> 02:30.000]  Radley Balko, who recently authored the New York Times bestselling book, Rise of the Warrior Cop, will be speaking at the second annual Peaceful Streets Police Accountability Summit,
[02:30.000 --> 02:40.000]  taking place this Saturday, August 17th, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the AT&T Executive Conference Center on UT campus. More information at PeacefulStreets.com.
[02:40.000 --> 02:51.000]  Support for The Liberty Beat comes from Brave New Books, Austin's only brick-and-mortar store carrying Tangy Tangerine 2.0, and Austin at 1904 Guadalupe Street or online at BraveNewBookstore.com.
[02:51.000 --> 03:16.000]  And from tomorrow's meals today, South Austin Market Days every Saturday from 3 to 7 p.m. at 10106 Manchac Road.
[03:16.000 --> 03:39.000]  Really, man, come on, 6 o'clock news says somebody's been shot, somebody's been abused, somebody blew up a building, somebody stole their car, somebody got away, somebody didn't get too far, yeah, they didn't get too far.
[03:39.000 --> 03:47.000]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day, son, when a man had to answer for the weed that he'd done.
[03:47.000 --> 04:01.000]  Take all the rope in Texas by the tall oak tree, round up all of them dead boys, hang them high up the street, for all the people to see.
[04:01.000 --> 04:09.000]  That's just as smart thing you should always find, you've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line.
[04:09.000 --> 04:17.000]  When the guns won't settle, we'll sing a victory tune and we'll haul me back at the local salute.
[04:17.000 --> 04:32.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing, let's get for my men before my horses.
[04:32.000 --> 04:50.000]  The Rule of Law radio show, Monday night, it is August 12, 2013. All right. Now, hopefully I didn't mess it up too bad there at the beginning, my mouse is misbehaving here.
[04:50.000 --> 05:08.000]  Okay. What I'd like to talk about tonight is something I saw happen in court here a little while ago, dealing with a county prosecutor. Now, this is a fairly young guy who thinks he's all that in a bag of chips, which most of them do.
[05:08.000 --> 05:22.000]  And one of the things that he's plying the jury with during his voir dire is he's asking them questions like, does everyone understand why you have to have a license? Does everyone understand why you have to do this, that, or the other?
[05:22.000 --> 05:38.000]  And what he's fishing for is the answer he generally gets. Everybody responds with the idea that, well, yeah, it's to show that you're qualified to operate the car on the road. It's for public safety. It's for blah, blah, blah.
[05:38.000 --> 05:52.000]  Folks, that's horse apples. If it had to do with public safety, every time you renewed your license, you would have to retake the test to show you were safe and competent to get the license.
[05:52.000 --> 06:08.000]  But you don't. Once you have it, all it takes to keep it is keep paying them money. Period. That's all it ever took. It has nothing to do with public safety. Absolutely nothing.
[06:08.000 --> 06:22.000]  So how do you counter questions like that from a prosecutor to a jury during voir dire? Well, you ask a series of questions of your own. Basically, he'll go through the rig and roll. He'll ask that type of question.
[06:22.000 --> 06:44.000]  He'll ask kinds of questions of have you ever had a ticket and what was the outcome? Were you satisfied that it was the right thing? And he'll get generally people up there that'll talk about, well, yeah, I broke the law. I knew I was breaking the law. But, you know, it ain't really wrong unless you're getting caught and all that sort of stuff.
[06:44.000 --> 06:59.000]  But that just goes to show you the mental process of most average people these days. It's only wrong if you get caught. And since you did, I'm going to presume you were wrong.
[06:59.000 --> 07:07.000]  This is why I tell you you're not going to educate a jury. The best you can do is show them how stupid they sound.
[07:07.000 --> 07:20.000]  So when they start with this, it's for public safety. It's so we're sure that you're competent and all this kind of stuff. Well, let's think of a few questions we can ask to counter that sort of statement.
[07:20.000 --> 07:25.000]  How many people here in the jury pool have ever had an accident?
[07:25.000 --> 07:31.000]  Okay, now out of all those that have ever been involved in an accident, how many of them were your fault?
[07:31.000 --> 07:35.000]  Has anybody ever had one that was your fault?
[07:35.000 --> 07:42.000]  Well, Mr. So-and-so, you raised your hand. You said you had an accident that was your fault. Can you tell us a little bit about that?
[07:42.000 --> 07:53.000]  And he'll go into a story about, yeah, it was this and this and it was such and such kind of day. It was rainy or somebody pulled out in front of me or a deer did or something of that effect.
[07:53.000 --> 07:56.000]  And it caused me to have an accident.
[07:56.000 --> 08:07.000]  Oh, okay. So you didn't have the accident. Some external thing caused you to have the accident. Is that what we're understanding? Well, no, no, it was me. It was me. I should have done blah, blah, blah.
[08:07.000 --> 08:23.000]  Well, I don't understand. You had a license, right? Well, yeah. And you had insurance on your car, right? Yeah. And your car was registered, right? Yeah. And it was inspected, right? Yeah.
[08:23.000 --> 08:31.000]  So how in the world could you possibly have an accident if you did all those things in the name of public safety? You should have been what we would refer to as bulletproof.
[08:31.000 --> 08:43.000]  If you had all of these things and these things were done entirely to make public safety safe, how could you have possibly been involved in an accident?
[08:43.000 --> 08:51.000]  Well, I don't think that's a right way of looking at it and all this kind of stuff. Well, excuse me, but why isn't it a proper way of looking at it?
[08:51.000 --> 09:04.000]  You said during the questions from the prosecutor that having the license was to be sure that you were competent and qualified to be behind the wheel so as not to be a danger to the public.
[09:04.000 --> 09:17.000]  Now, you just said you had an accident, but at the same time, you had a license. So obviously the license is not some sort of magical talisman that grants someone competency.
[09:17.000 --> 09:28.000]  Or were you just saying that at that particular moment in time, the license failed and your competency went out the window, therefore you had an accident?
[09:28.000 --> 09:38.000]  It just sounds stupid when they say that it's for this reason when you can obviously prove it had nothing to do with the reason.
[09:38.000 --> 09:55.000]  Sir, could you have avoided the accident or would you have known what to do even if you didn't have that license? If someone had taught you how to do things properly, just like the guy did previously, but they didn't have a license,
[09:55.000 --> 10:05.000]  would you still feel competent to get behind the wheel and do what's right and not need a piece of plastic to say you do?
[10:05.000 --> 10:19.000]  Same thing goes for all the rest of it. The prosecutor went to this rigmarole now. When somebody has insurance, you want to be able to be sure that they can pay you if they have an accident and they're the cause of it and so on and so forth.
[10:19.000 --> 10:28.000]  Well, folks, I'm here to tell you that's a ball-faced lie too. Having insurance is absolutely no guarantee whatsoever that anybody gets covered.
[10:28.000 --> 10:39.000]  The insurance company may choose not to pay a penny to anybody and they can come up with any reason they want to as to why they don't want to pay it, and that'll be that.
[10:39.000 --> 10:46.000]  You will then have to go to court and sue the insurance company, whether it's yours or the other party's, to get a dime.
[10:46.000 --> 11:12.000]  And the way the court system is set up, you can never tell the jury that the other party even has an insurance company. You must sue the individual, not his insurance company, even though he has contracted with that insurance company to cover him if something happens and it's his fault.
[11:12.000 --> 11:20.000]  But you can't name the insurance company, at least not here in Texas, as a defendant. You can only name the individual.
[11:20.000 --> 11:38.000]  You're not even allowed to mention whether or not the other side even has insurance. The entire suit is constructed on the perception that it is the individual who wouldn't pay you.
[11:38.000 --> 11:53.000]  In other words, it is legalized fraud and jury tampering. It's tampering with the evidence. It's tampering with the jury because they're not being allowed to get access to all the truthful, proper information.
[11:53.000 --> 12:21.000]  There is no way in God's green earth this would be considered a moral and ethical way to manage such a case. But this is the way that your legislators, paid for by the insurance companies and everything else, the lobby groups and everything, protect them from being named in these suits and thus being directly responsible for their refusal to pay.
[12:21.000 --> 12:48.000]  They want it to look like you're suing some 70-year-old woman, like you're the bad guy. She pulls out in front of you, causes you to total out your car, get injured, miss work, you name it, but instead of her insurance company ponying up, they say no and you have to look like the bad guy suing the little old lady.
[12:48.000 --> 13:03.000]  Tell me how this is not fraudulent. Tell me how this is ethical or moral, how it is not tampering, how it is not preventing the jury from having access to all the proper facts.
[13:03.000 --> 13:18.000]  It is ridiculous. And yet, it goes on every single day. And that's just one of the examples of the way they do these things.
[13:18.000 --> 13:37.000]  The prosecutor will go into all kinds of bilious statements about, you know, it's for this reason, it's for this reason, don't you think that everybody ought to? And he's trying to put the jury in a particular mindset to accept the fact that he's going to lie to them.
[13:37.000 --> 13:46.000]  And he's going to lie to them with the impression that it's for their safety, that everybody must do this or everything's a problem.
[13:46.000 --> 13:56.000]  Folks, prior to 1986, mandatory insurance didn't exist in Texas, even for commercial drivers. Didn't exist at all.
[13:56.000 --> 14:07.000]  How in the world did we function up to 1986 without it? Oh wait, that's because the insurance lobby didn't exist as powerful as it does then.
[14:07.000 --> 14:17.000]  The insurance lobby wasn't getting the legislature to force millions of people into paying premiums that they didn't have to pay.
[14:17.000 --> 14:24.000]  So the insurance company was guaranteed a market and a profit.
[14:24.000 --> 14:39.000]  You want to see insurance rates drop back to the pre-86 era? Make them compete for your business. Not make it where business is good by state mandate.
[14:39.000 --> 14:54.000]  Okay, when business is good by state mandate, we got a problem. We have a big problem. The state is in essence compelling you to participate in a commercial activity, the purchase of insurance.
[14:54.000 --> 15:06.000]  They're compelling you to enter into a contract against your will. But then they try to pass it off as oh no no, you still have the right to contract with whatever insurance company you want.
[15:06.000 --> 15:19.000]  As long as you do it with somebody. Again, what's this little thing in the constitution about the state, you know, they can't interfere with contracts?
[15:19.000 --> 15:30.000]  Well, wouldn't interfering also be included not only once a contract is formed, but in starting one to begin with?
[15:30.000 --> 15:38.000]  Every courtroom in America says no compelled contract is a valid contract.
[15:38.000 --> 15:49.000]  And then we wonder how in the world do we make an insurance company pay off on a contract that we were forced into in a compulsory manner?
[15:49.000 --> 15:55.000]  How can they not claim just as easily that we don't want to pay the premium? This was a compelled contract.
[15:55.000 --> 16:07.000]  We don't have to pay off. We didn't want to enter into this. The state just made us. They said we had to take people who came to the door and said I want insurance.
[16:07.000 --> 16:18.000]  It's a rigged system, folks. It's always been a rigged system. It's never going to stop being a rigged system as long as you people stay asleep.
[16:18.000 --> 16:30.000]  Okay? As long as you're asleep, this is what happens. As long as you let the lobbyists run your government, this is what happens.
[16:30.000 --> 16:43.000]  When special interest through corporate pressure gets what they want, we lose. We lose. No ifs, no ands, and no buts.
[16:43.000 --> 16:52.000]  All right, folks. Calling number 512-646-1984. Andrew, I see you there on the board. Hang on. I'll get you on the other side of the break.
[16:52.000 --> 17:00.000]  Come on, folks. I need some callers and some questions. We'll be right back on the other side. Y'all hang on.
[17:00.000 --> 17:25.000]  Wild Tang, you make my heart sing. You make everything through that. Wild Tang. Wild Tang, I think I love you.
[17:25.000 --> 17:37.000]  I want to know for sure. So come on. Nutrify me. I love you.
[17:37.000 --> 17:45.000]  Did you know that you could extend your life by as much as 15% by taking your liberty products like Tangy Tangerine?
[17:45.000 --> 17:55.000]  My missus lost so much weight by taking Tangy Tangerine. She eventually disappeared, which will probably let me live an extra 15 years.
[17:55.000 --> 18:00.000]  Go to logospraytheownetwork.com and click the Ungevity banner.
[18:00.000 --> 18:09.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons. How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:27.000 --> 18:34.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:41.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:49.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 19:01.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-f at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosradioNetwork.com
[19:31.000 --> 19:33.000]  The Logos Radio Network.
[20:01.000 --> 20:03.000]  The Logos Radio Network.
[20:32.000 --> 20:37.000]  Hi, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[20:37.000 --> 20:43.000]  All right. We're going to go to Andrew in Pennsylvania. Andrew, what can we do for you?
[20:43.000 --> 20:51.000]  Hi, Eddie. I wanted to bring up the subject of the issue of how many laws that the government has passed, which are illegal laws.
[20:51.000 --> 21:01.000]  There are certain illegal past laws, however, that one common citizen could interpret as being something that they could use to their advantage, in a sense.
[21:01.000 --> 21:08.000]  Two examples I wanted to bring up are that, first of all, Bradley Manning gets into legal trouble for exposing classified documents.
[21:08.000 --> 21:16.000]  But for some reason, the United States government doesn't get into trouble for violating Executive Order 13526, Section 1.7,
[21:16.000 --> 21:21.000]  which makes it illegal for the government to classify things in order to conceal government wrongdoing.
[21:21.000 --> 21:27.000]  I mean, such an Executive Order is illegal for the president to pass, but it's certainly one that a common citizen could appreciate.
[21:27.000 --> 21:31.000]  And another example of what I'm talking about is the Constitution.
[21:31.000 --> 21:36.000]  I mean, it's technically an illegal document because you've explained the founding fathers passed it without consent of the people.
[21:36.000 --> 21:40.000]  And there's that self-destruct clause about who can be president of the United States.
[21:40.000 --> 21:47.000]  But there are many examples, of course, where people use bill amendment rights to their advantage.
[21:47.000 --> 21:54.000]  And not to play devil's advocate or anything, but in your red light special appearance letter here, you do cite the Fourth and Fifth Amendment.
[21:54.000 --> 22:02.000]  And in that talk you gave on Infowars, I do remember one example where you cited the Fourteenth Amendment, which does not mean what we think it does.
[22:02.000 --> 22:05.000]  It only applies to slaves, as you've explained before.
[22:05.000 --> 22:11.000]  So how can a citizen legally or not legally use illegally passed laws to their advantage?
[22:11.000 --> 22:18.000]  Well, first off, you've got a whole bunch of things in there that we need to step on real quick.
[22:18.000 --> 22:21.000]  First, being a citizen is never a good thing.
[22:21.000 --> 22:23.000]  A citizen is a slave.
[22:23.000 --> 22:28.000]  Second, Executive Orders are not and never have been laws.
[22:28.000 --> 22:36.000]  They are executive determinations that only have effect on the executive federal department.
[22:36.000 --> 22:42.000]  Only those in the federal executive branch of government are bound by an executive order.
[22:42.000 --> 22:46.000]  It does not bind anyone else anywhere.
[22:46.000 --> 22:48.000]  It never has.
[22:48.000 --> 22:56.000]  It is only the chief executive officer at the federal level giving orders to his executive functionaries.
[22:56.000 --> 22:57.000]  That's it.
[22:57.000 --> 23:02.000]  It's never been law, and I get so tired of hearing people cited as if it is.
[23:02.000 --> 23:07.000]  I get so tired of hearing the media talking heads talking about them as if they are.
[23:07.000 --> 23:17.000]  Well, President Obama signed Executive Order 9754361 today, and now you all have to go out and suck beer every Friday.
[23:17.000 --> 23:19.000]  No, you don't.
[23:19.000 --> 23:23.000]  It's got nothing to do with you and me.
[23:23.000 --> 23:29.000]  As far as citing 4th and 5th Amendment in the red light camera, I don't think I do that.
[23:29.000 --> 23:37.000]  I cite your right to remain silent, your right to do process of law, the right to be innocent until proven guilty,
[23:37.000 --> 23:41.000]  but I don't cite it as coming from any amendment, I don't think, do I?
[23:41.000 --> 23:47.000]  The words 4th and 5th Amendment do appear in your red light special appearance.
[23:47.000 --> 23:51.000]  Then someone's giving you a version of it I didn't write, I think.
[23:51.000 --> 23:56.000]  I'd have to look at it and find out, but it's not supposed to have,
[23:56.000 --> 24:02.000]  because one of my pet peeves is citing the federal Constitution as being binding upon anyone anyway,
[24:02.000 --> 24:11.000]  because after going through it as much as I have, I've come to the conclusion that thing hasn't existed in any binding form upon anyone
[24:11.000 --> 24:17.000]  since within 100 years of when it was allegedly adopted.
[24:17.000 --> 24:23.000]  That's right. I know you explained about the self-destruct clause and all that, but I'm just pointing out that...
[24:23.000 --> 24:26.000]  Well, if it does, I'll make sure and get it fixed.
[24:26.000 --> 24:29.000]  Yeah, it does. It does mention the words 4th Amendment and 5th Amendment,
[24:29.000 --> 24:34.000]  and as someone who understands the Constitution is technically legal, I'm thinking, well, maybe you should mention that.
[24:34.000 --> 24:39.000]  Also in your Infowars talk, when you were talking about how the right to travel,
[24:39.000 --> 24:45.000]  the courts have ruled as a guaranteed right to all Americans, the part you cited said that the 14th Amendment,
[24:45.000 --> 24:51.000]  Section 1, you didn't mention Section 1, but that section, the people who are ignorant of the truth about the 14th Amendment
[24:51.000 --> 24:54.000]  would say, oh, well, that means due process, it applies to everyone in the state.
[24:54.000 --> 25:02.000]  Now, the Supreme Court or whatever court it was, was acting as if that was the law, but of course, technically it's not.
[25:02.000 --> 25:08.000]  And just to make sure like this maybe won't become a problem down the road, how would you address an issue like that?
[25:08.000 --> 25:13.000]  Because I did remember seeing that in your presentation, the 14th Amendment being cited.
[25:13.000 --> 25:18.000]  Well, first and foremost, you have to understand when they're citing law and when they're not.
[25:18.000 --> 25:22.000]  If they're citing ordinance or statute, they're not citing law.
[25:22.000 --> 25:29.000]  They're citing regulation, one at a municipal corporate level or a county corporate level,
[25:29.000 --> 25:33.000]  and the other at a state corporate level.
[25:33.000 --> 25:38.000]  Statutes are not law any more than an ordinance is law.
[25:38.000 --> 25:45.000]  A statute is nothing more than a rewritten version of the bill passed by the legislature.
[25:45.000 --> 25:54.000]  Now, in some instances, they have to be reviewed and approved, but that doesn't make it the law.
[25:54.000 --> 26:03.000]  The law is the bill that was voted on in the House and the Senate, passed by the House and the Senate, and submitted for a signature.
[26:03.000 --> 26:08.000]  That is the law once it is signed.
[26:08.000 --> 26:13.000]  Everything else, have you ever noticed how a bill may only have a dozen pages in it,
[26:13.000 --> 26:22.000]  yet the regulation that supposedly creates the enforcement of that bill may be several hundred to several thousand pages?
[26:22.000 --> 26:26.000]  How did a dozen become several thousand?
[26:26.000 --> 26:37.000]  Well, it's because somebody went through the effort of trying to interpret what that original law actually said and rewrote it.
[26:37.000 --> 26:44.000]  So can you use it? Absolutely. When you make the argument, that's not the law.
[26:44.000 --> 26:58.000]  The question is, is can you create a proper legal argument that shows that was not the intent of the legislature in the bill for that statute to do what it does?
[26:58.000 --> 27:02.000]  Okay. I think I am. My God, this is really confusing.
[27:02.000 --> 27:08.000]  I'm definitely going to listen to everything you said as soon as this gets uploaded on the LogosRanger Network Archive page,
[27:08.000 --> 27:11.000]  because there's a lot of information to digest here.
[27:11.000 --> 27:20.000]  But in a nutshell, are you basically saying, no, you do not and you should not try to use laws that do not mean what you're led to believe they mean?
[27:20.000 --> 27:26.000]  No, that's not what I'm saying. You can point out that they're misrepresenting what the statute even means.
[27:26.000 --> 27:32.000]  You can point that out. But the moment you start doing that, you're going to a merits argument.
[27:32.000 --> 27:43.000]  Now, when you are in a penal code situation where you're accused of an actual crime from a penal code, there you have no choice but to address merits.
[27:43.000 --> 27:55.000]  But in any other code, you're dealing with a regulable administrative activity and an administrative set of rules that govern the regulation of that activity.
[27:55.000 --> 28:03.000]  There, going to merits, if you're not engaged in that activity, is not the proper course of action.
[28:03.000 --> 28:12.000]  In which case, no, you do not want to be arguing the statutes because the statutes will bind you to the activity.
[28:12.000 --> 28:25.000]  You cannot claim the protection or the validity of a statute in the way it's being used and at the same time disavow it as being applicable.
[28:25.000 --> 28:30.000]  Okay. That does make sense. I'll definitely listen to this again.
[28:30.000 --> 28:34.000]  But since you mentioned the whole issue of merits, I want to bring up one more thing.
[28:34.000 --> 28:43.000]  I'm sorry to have to make you repeat yourself, but I have to ask this again because the 7.1 Show July 1st was never uploaded to the archive page where I brought up the issue with you
[28:43.000 --> 28:51.000]  of why we do not have to create a new version of your courtroom script for every individual state and country because we're all created by the Creator.
[28:51.000 --> 28:54.000]  We all have the same rights which are bestowed unto us by the Creator.
[28:54.000 --> 29:04.000]  And I ask you the question, well, if I'm following your courtroom script and I get to the part of the script that cites the Texas Pacific law,
[29:04.000 --> 29:10.000]  which says that a transportation stop is a custodial arrest, and you said that's not an issue, but I don't remember what you said after that.
[29:10.000 --> 29:13.000]  So what is a Pennsylvania resident like me supposed to say?
[29:13.000 --> 29:17.000]  You don't necessarily have to go to the custodial arrest to defend your rights.
[29:17.000 --> 29:22.000]  Your rights are not related specifically to whether or not it's a custodial's arrest.
[29:22.000 --> 29:28.000]  It's the right to remain silent and the right to assistance of counsel, regardless of what kind of arrest it is.
[29:28.000 --> 29:33.000]  So you don't necessarily have to adapt everything that may be Texas-specific.
[29:33.000 --> 29:38.000]  But if you can find the relevant law in your state, then by all means do it.
[29:38.000 --> 29:42.000]  Just don't go to an argument on the merits of the accusation.
[29:42.000 --> 29:47.000]  Stick to the defense of your rights.
[29:47.000 --> 29:48.000]  You follow?
[29:48.000 --> 29:49.000]  Yes, I do.
[29:49.000 --> 29:50.000]  All right, hang on a second, Andrew.
[29:50.000 --> 29:53.000]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984.
[29:53.000 --> 29:54.000]  That's the call-in number.
[29:54.000 --> 30:02.000]  We'll be right back.
[30:02.000 --> 30:07.000]  When consumers objected to genetically modified foods, big companies leapt into action.
[30:07.000 --> 30:11.000]  But instead of changing their products, they hired a marketing guru to change our minds.
[30:11.000 --> 30:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with the details in just a moment.
[30:15.000 --> 30:17.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.000 --> 30:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.000 --> 30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:26.000 --> 30:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.000 --> 30:33.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.000 --> 30:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:37.000 --> 30:41.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.000 --> 30:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.000 --> 30:49.000]  Companies like Monsanto, Kraft, and Procter & Gamble know consumers
[30:49.000 --> 30:51.000]  don't like their genetically modified foods.
[30:51.000 --> 30:53.000]  But rather than take our concerns seriously,
[30:53.000 --> 30:59.000]  they opted to overcome opposition with their secret weapon, Dr. Clotaire Repale.
[30:59.000 --> 31:03.000]  Repale specializes in accessing what he calls the reptilian brain of consumers
[31:03.000 --> 31:06.000]  to change how we think about things like GMO foods.
[31:06.000 --> 31:08.000]  His advice to the GMO industry?
[31:08.000 --> 31:13.000]  Avoid using terms like DNA, experiments, pesticides, and profits.
[31:13.000 --> 31:17.000]  Place them instead with farmers, children, earth, and flowers.
[31:17.000 --> 31:20.000]  Unfortunately, pretty words alone don't make GMO foods safe.
[31:20.000 --> 31:22.000]  I say let's get back to natural.
[31:22.000 --> 31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.000 --> 31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:36.000 --> 31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:38.000 --> 31:43.000]  Over 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.000 --> 31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:46.000 --> 31:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[31:49.000 --> 31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:50.000 --> 31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.000 --> 31:52.000]  I'm a New York City Correctional.
[31:52.000 --> 31:53.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.000 --> 31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.000 --> 31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:58.000 --> 32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:01.000 --> 32:05.000]  Do you feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[32:05.000 --> 32:06.000]  Boring!
[32:06.000 --> 32:09.000]  What?
[32:09.000 --> 32:13.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[32:13.000 --> 32:17.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans,
[32:17.000 --> 32:20.000]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[32:20.000 --> 32:26.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[32:26.000 --> 32:31.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[32:31.000 --> 32:37.000]  My staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[32:37.000 --> 32:44.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[32:44.000 --> 32:51.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503,
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:01.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary, and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[33:01.000 --> 33:11.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:11.000 --> 33:25.000]  Yeah, I got a warrant, and I'm going to solve them, to the head government them, prosecute them.
[33:25.000 --> 33:50.000]  Okay.
[33:50.000 --> 33:55.000]  Hi, folks. We are back. This is Rules Law Radio. We're going to finish up with Andrew in Pennsylvania.
[33:55.000 --> 33:56.000]  All right, Andrew.
[33:56.000 --> 33:59.000]  Yeah, thanks for letting me talk on the other side of the break.
[33:59.000 --> 34:10.000]  One last thing. Do you have a backup plan in case the new world order plants a Trojan horse or a virus in Dow of Law.com when it launches?
[34:10.000 --> 34:14.000]  Do we have a backup plan? Yeah, don't get backdoored in the first place.
[34:14.000 --> 34:21.000]  You made sure to take care of that problem so they won't be able to hack into your system.
[34:21.000 --> 34:27.000]  Yeah, well, even if they did, we're going to have everything archived offsite anyway.
[34:27.000 --> 34:32.000]  Before we even launch, we'll have everything ready to go, and we'll have it backed up and all that good stuff.
[34:32.000 --> 34:36.000]  And essentially, it's a no-brainer to have them reassign a server as needed.
[34:36.000 --> 34:46.000]  The service we're going to be using is an extremely reliable one. And we're not running a Windows system server of any kind,
[34:46.000 --> 34:53.000]  so the NSA won't have free backdoor access to it like they do everybody else's.
[34:53.000 --> 35:01.000]  Yes, long live Edward Snowden. Yeah, lots of more people need to wake up to that and understand that violating the Fourth Amendment isn't cool.
[35:01.000 --> 35:02.000]  Yeah.
[35:02.000 --> 35:07.000]  Well, I shouldn't even sign the Fourth Amendment because the Constitution doesn't exist. Right. That's right.
[35:07.000 --> 35:12.000]  Now you're getting it. Yep, I am. Thanks for letting me on your show, Eddie.
[35:12.000 --> 35:15.000]  No problem, Andrew. Thanks for calling. You're welcome.
[35:15.000 --> 35:17.000]  All right. Bye-bye. All right.
[35:17.000 --> 35:23.000]  Now we're going to go to Charlie in Missouri, or is this Montana? I forget here. Charlie?
[35:23.000 --> 35:27.000]  Oh, it's Missouri. Ah, Missouri. Okay. Then I did have it right.
[35:27.000 --> 35:30.000]  Well, hey, Eddie. It's good to talk to you. You too. What's up?
[35:30.000 --> 35:35.000]  Hey, when is the plan date? Do you have a plan date on there at Tower Law yet?
[35:35.000 --> 35:44.000]  Well, yes and no. We're still working on getting the final security stuff on it set up and getting the conferencing portion ready.
[35:44.000 --> 35:52.000]  But besides those two things, we've also got to get the payment system in place to do the classes and everything with.
[35:52.000 --> 35:56.000]  So we've actually got at least three parts we've got to have ready and working.
[35:56.000 --> 36:02.000]  And I don't want to launch anything that isn't secure in every respect.
[36:02.000 --> 36:09.000]  So until we make sure we have all that working, no, I do not have a specific definite date.
[36:09.000 --> 36:15.000]  Well, I can't. Type 1 can't wait until it's up because I don't have an opportunity to get down there to Texas to go to your courses.
[36:15.000 --> 36:18.000]  We can't wait for it to be up either, to tell you the truth.
[36:18.000 --> 36:26.000]  And we want to between everything that those that are working on it have going on and have to deal with in the interim as well as working on that
[36:26.000 --> 36:37.000]  and making sure that it is secure because we don't want anyone getting access to this that shouldn't have access to this for obvious reasons.
[36:37.000 --> 36:43.000]  So we're going to make sure the system doesn't do a lot of things that the government would love to take advantage of.
[36:43.000 --> 36:52.000]  We're not going to track people's personal information above a certain level if it takes to maintain a specific account for an individual.
[36:52.000 --> 36:58.000]  But we're not going to maintain anything else about it like IP addresses and stuff like that.
[36:58.000 --> 37:03.000]  We'll only need that information live while we're doing something.
[37:03.000 --> 37:04.000]  And that will be that.
[37:04.000 --> 37:08.000]  So we're trying to make sure we've got all that implemented in the way we need to.
[37:08.000 --> 37:10.000]  Well, I am looking forward to it.
[37:10.000 --> 37:18.000]  You know, I mean, you're like the only person I know that has the information that you have that's willing to share with people the way you do.
[37:18.000 --> 37:20.000]  And you're out of Texas.
[37:20.000 --> 37:25.000]  You got any information on anybody like you here in Missouri, especially in the St. Louis area?
[37:25.000 --> 37:36.000]  No, which is one of the things I'm hoping that Dow brings to light is once we start gathering people in from various places that want to join up
[37:36.000 --> 37:50.000]  and show what skills they have and knowledge they have, then being able to link up with those people on our site will be enormously easy compared to the way it is right now.
[37:50.000 --> 38:01.000]  Personally, I get calls from all over, but I do not track someone's skill set or capabilities or try to get into that with them on the show.
[38:01.000 --> 38:12.000]  And I don't correspond with a lot of people for anything outside of dealing with help for cases and things like that, though oftentimes I do get emails asking me if I know a particular individual
[38:12.000 --> 38:18.000]  and their information, would I have them as a guest, and so on and so forth, just stuff like that.
[38:18.000 --> 38:33.000]  If anyone out there listens and they know that they have the capability to help others, then please make it known, especially when we get Dow law up, make it known.
[38:33.000 --> 38:48.000]  I do have a lot of information here. I've put into PDF format all the statutes and the laws and the commentaries and notes. It's very easy to track.
[38:48.000 --> 38:54.000]  Of course, you can get the statutes here online pretty easy, but it's not like having a book of them.
[38:54.000 --> 39:03.000]  So anyway, as I go through them and I'm hearing things you say tonight, I'm about executive orders and they don't apply to us and everything else.
[39:03.000 --> 39:08.000]  The problem with all that, though, I've found is nobody knows they don't apply to all that, so you get hooked up on all that stuff.
[39:08.000 --> 39:19.000]  Oh, believe me, the people that should know do know. They just don't think you should know. They want you to buy into anything that said you must do.
[39:19.000 --> 39:30.000]  I've been going to court here for a few years now. Actually, I've been corresponding with you a little bit. I just sent you a bunch of stuff.
[39:30.000 --> 39:37.000]  You're probably pretty busy, so I don't know if you got to it, but I'll tell you, these guys here, they don't even know what they're doing.
[39:37.000 --> 39:42.000]  I went to municipal court on not having trash, and it went up to the circuit court.
[39:42.000 --> 39:49.000]  Then when I got to the circuit court, I had told them in the circuit court that the municipal court didn't have jurisdiction,
[39:49.000 --> 39:59.000]  so the judge in the circuit court, they made the prosecutor of the municipal court address that they didn't have jurisdiction.
[39:59.000 --> 40:06.000]  Well, it went on and on, and finally the municipal court surrendered.
[40:06.000 --> 40:13.000]  Then here, some time later, I got in trouble for the same thing in the municipal court.
[40:13.000 --> 40:18.000]  I went to the municipal court. The municipal court sent me a bunch of junk. I just ignored it.
[40:18.000 --> 40:24.000]  They arrested me, so then they had me in court. I challenged their jurisdiction. I didn't accept anything they did.
[40:24.000 --> 40:30.000]  They found me guilty over my objection. I took it up to the circuit court again for the same thing.
[40:30.000 --> 40:37.000]  When I got to the circuit court, the first thing I told the judge is they didn't have jurisdiction because I wasn't a person, so she dismissed my case.
[40:37.000 --> 40:43.000]  You see what happened? The first time I went to the circuit court, they let me challenge the jurisdiction.
[40:43.000 --> 40:49.000]  The second time I went to the circuit court for the same thing, as soon as I said I wasn't a person, they dismissed the case.
[40:49.000 --> 40:50.000]  They said, well, you can't be here.
[40:50.000 --> 40:53.000]  They dismissed the case or your appeal?
[40:53.000 --> 40:59.000]  They dismissed my appeal. She just dismissed it. She said, you can't be here.
[40:59.000 --> 41:06.000]  I tell you, I've been doing this for a while here, fighting tickets and everything. I was dumbfounded on that.
[41:06.000 --> 41:11.000]  I didn't know what to do. I haven't done anything now. I'm trying to figure out what to do.
[41:11.000 --> 41:16.000]  Well, did you use the defense at the municipal level?
[41:16.000 --> 41:27.000]  Yes, I did. The first thing I did is I never appeared in their court. Everything was special appearance. I never appeared.
[41:27.000 --> 41:32.000]  What they did is they issued an arrest warrant, sent me to jail, but then I had to go to court.
[41:32.000 --> 41:36.000]  They wanted my money back and I didn't want to go to jail again.
[41:36.000 --> 41:41.000]  Then in the municipal court, all I did is challenge the jurisdiction over and over again. They just proceeded on.
[41:41.000 --> 41:49.000]  They had jurisdiction and just proceeded on. What can you do?
[41:49.000 --> 41:55.000]  I filed for the trials in Ova. I thought it would go the same way it did the last time, which when I filed for the trials in Ova
[41:55.000 --> 41:59.000]  and I got it to the circuit court, I challenged their jurisdiction. They never had it.
[41:59.000 --> 42:05.000]  The judge made them show they had jurisdiction. The second time, like I said, the judge just said,
[42:05.000 --> 42:12.000]  since I'm not a person, I can't be there. She dismissed it. There was nothing more she would take.
[42:12.000 --> 42:20.000]  I had no record of that. I did have it recorded. I had two witnesses in court.
[42:20.000 --> 42:23.000]  What do you do with that, Eddie?
[42:23.000 --> 42:28.000]  Beat them with a stick.
[42:28.000 --> 42:29.000]  Yeah, I'd like to beat that.
[42:29.000 --> 42:36.000]  Well, if they're denying you access to the court for the purpose of appeal, I mean, you have the right to challenge the jurisdiction of the trial court.
[42:36.000 --> 42:40.000]  If they're admitting they didn't have jurisdiction because you aren't a person,
[42:40.000 --> 42:47.000]  then they certainly can't admit they had jurisdiction to conduct a trial, which makes that a whole other ballgame.
[42:47.000 --> 42:54.000]  Well, my position now is that I'm thinking that the only thing that I got to do is I have to file a motion to vacate.
[42:54.000 --> 43:03.000]  Well, but again, if the only one that can appear in the court to argue the motion to vacate is a person, how do you intend to do that?
[43:03.000 --> 43:06.000]  Well, so what do you do, Eddie?
[43:06.000 --> 43:13.000]  Well, again, at some point, you have to figure out what's going to work and what's not.
[43:13.000 --> 43:16.000]  Right. Yeah, that's where I'm...
[43:16.000 --> 43:28.000]  And to tell you the truth, I mean, again, I've never seen a judge throw it out based upon just the assertion
[43:28.000 --> 43:35.000]  until you could prove that person didn't include you as a living being.
[43:35.000 --> 43:42.000]  That is, I mean, you got to make them admit what a person is, and then they don't have a choice but to overturn it.
[43:42.000 --> 43:46.000]  At least you've got a legal standing argument in the record, then, if that's the case.
[43:46.000 --> 43:48.000]  Hang on just a second, Charlie. We'll be right back.
[43:48.000 --> 43:54.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[43:54.000 --> 44:00.000]  Y'all hang on, folks. We will be right back.
[44:00.000 --> 44:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.000 --> 44:10.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[44:10.000 --> 44:15.000]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.000 --> 44:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.000 --> 44:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too.
[44:27.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:03.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.000 --> 45:10.000]  Mr. President, members of Congress, you've been making a lot of noise about taking our guns away.
[45:10.000 --> 45:16.000]  But you might want to review history. 1835, Gonzales, Texas Territory.
[45:16.000 --> 45:21.000]  The authorities wanted to confiscate the big gun that protected that colony.
[45:21.000 --> 45:23.000]  You know what the people said?
[45:23.000 --> 45:25.000]  Come and take it.
[45:25.000 --> 45:31.000]  Because they were willing to fight for their freedom and their guns.
[45:31.000 --> 45:34.000]  Come and take it if you want it.
[45:34.000 --> 45:37.000]  Come and take it if you think you can.
[45:37.000 --> 45:39.000]  Come and take it.
[45:39.000 --> 45:44.000]  But I warn you, you'll have to fight it from a cold dead ends.
[45:44.000 --> 45:47.000]  We want the freedom that God gave us.
[45:47.000 --> 45:50.000]  So you best not cross that line.
[45:50.000 --> 45:55.000]  If you want this gun, you gotta come through us and take it.
[45:55.000 --> 45:58.000]  One shot at a time.
[45:58.000 --> 46:02.000]  Just like Gonzales, we're keeping our guns.
[46:22.000 --> 46:26.000]  Hi folks, we are back and we're talking to Charlie in Missouri.
[46:26.000 --> 46:29.000]  Alright, Charlie.
[46:29.000 --> 46:33.000]  Well, now I'm just caught trying to figure out what to do now.
[46:33.000 --> 46:34.000]  I'm stuck with a big fine.
[46:34.000 --> 46:37.000]  I don't know what happens if I don't go down and pay the fine right away.
[46:37.000 --> 46:44.000]  Well, again, you can try to file the motion to void judgment and see what it gets you.
[46:44.000 --> 46:49.000]  You can always assert that the judgment is void because they lacked original jurisdiction in the first place.
[46:49.000 --> 46:53.000]  They never got impersonal jurisdiction.
[46:53.000 --> 46:56.000]  What do you think it's going to get me, nowhere?
[46:56.000 --> 46:58.000]  Well, again, I have no idea.
[46:58.000 --> 47:01.000]  I don't know what your argument is going to be when you put it on paper.
[47:01.000 --> 47:07.000]  It all depends on how well you make the argument and assert the facts.
[47:07.000 --> 47:09.000]  I'm going to attempt to.
[47:09.000 --> 47:10.000]  I've sent you some stuff.
[47:10.000 --> 47:11.000]  I hope you get a chance to look at it.
[47:11.000 --> 47:13.000]  And then you wrote me back.
[47:13.000 --> 47:17.000]  I'll send you that too and see what they say.
[47:17.000 --> 47:22.000]  And anyway, some of this stuff, it seems, you know, it's just crazy.
[47:22.000 --> 47:24.000]  I mean, they don't, it seems like they're lost too.
[47:24.000 --> 47:26.000]  They don't even know their own laws.
[47:26.000 --> 47:27.000]  I can tell you that.
[47:27.000 --> 47:28.000]  Well, no.
[47:28.000 --> 47:34.000]  But that's a whole other animal than them not being smart enough to understand them even if they did.
[47:34.000 --> 47:35.000]  Yeah.
[47:35.000 --> 47:39.000]  Well, I hope you get some people call in from St. Louis tonight and leave some information.
[47:39.000 --> 47:44.000]  Is that all right if I give you my email address in case somebody in this area wants to contact me?
[47:44.000 --> 47:47.000]  If you want to give it out, go ahead.
[47:47.000 --> 47:51.000]  It's fatherlikedadfathercb at gmail.com.
[47:51.000 --> 47:57.000]  Anybody wants to contact me about just, you know, standing up for your rights in this area and going to court for whatever?
[47:57.000 --> 48:01.000]  I got some information I'd like to find somebody else to work with too.
[48:01.000 --> 48:03.000]  So anyway, thanks for your time, Eddie.
[48:03.000 --> 48:04.000]  All right.
[48:04.000 --> 48:05.000]  Thanks for calling in, Charlie.
[48:05.000 --> 48:06.000]  Keep getting the information out.
[48:06.000 --> 48:08.000]  I can't wait for you to get your towel law up.
[48:08.000 --> 48:09.000]  All right.
[48:09.000 --> 48:10.000]  Thank you.
[48:10.000 --> 48:11.000]  Bye.
[48:11.000 --> 48:12.000]  All right.
[48:12.000 --> 48:13.000]  Bye-bye.
[48:13.000 --> 48:14.000]  All right.
[48:14.000 --> 48:17.000]  Now we're going to go to Clyde in Texas.
[48:17.000 --> 48:19.000]  Go ahead, Clyde.
[48:19.000 --> 48:21.000]  Hey, how are you doing, Eddie?
[48:21.000 --> 48:22.000]  All right.
[48:22.000 --> 48:23.000]  How are you?
[48:23.000 --> 48:24.000]  I'm doing just fine.
[48:24.000 --> 48:27.000]  I've got a little ticket situation going on.
[48:27.000 --> 48:30.000]  I wanted to ask you a couple of questions about it.
[48:30.000 --> 48:43.000]  I had a ticket for an expired inspection sticker, and I went into court today for a hearing and looked in the case file when I got there and saw summons for the officer.
[48:43.000 --> 48:53.000]  I figured I was going to get – I was in for the fix, but anyway, yeah, they wanted – I told the judge before the trial that I was here for a hearing, not a trial.
[48:53.000 --> 48:54.000]  I wasn't prepared for a trial.
[48:54.000 --> 48:55.000]  I haven't even pled.
[48:55.000 --> 49:07.000]  But they went ahead with the trial anyway, and of course I objected and didn't consent and no, protested, and they went ahead anyway.
[49:07.000 --> 49:09.000]  So now I need to –
[49:09.000 --> 49:12.000]  Did they give you notice of the trial?
[49:12.000 --> 49:16.000]  Well, they gave me notice of a hearing.
[49:16.000 --> 49:18.000]  Okay.
[49:18.000 --> 49:23.000]  And that's exactly what it says, a notice of a pretrial hearing?
[49:23.000 --> 49:26.000]  No, it just says notice of a hearing.
[49:26.000 --> 49:29.000]  But it doesn't say for a trial?
[49:29.000 --> 49:31.000]  No, sir.
[49:31.000 --> 49:33.000]  Jury or bench?
[49:33.000 --> 49:35.000]  No, no.
[49:35.000 --> 49:42.000]  Okay. And yeah, you can definitely go after them for lack of notice there.
[49:42.000 --> 49:43.000]  Yeah, I did.
[49:43.000 --> 49:45.000]  Well, I protested lack of notice.
[49:45.000 --> 49:48.000]  I protested no due process.
[49:48.000 --> 49:51.000]  I protested no information.
[49:51.000 --> 49:57.000]  I couldn't enter a plea because I didn't know the elements of the crime and the nature and cause.
[49:57.000 --> 49:59.000]  And –
[49:59.000 --> 50:01.000]  And they did this when?
[50:01.000 --> 50:02.000]  Today.
[50:02.000 --> 50:05.000]  You have – is this a court of record or a court of no record?
[50:05.000 --> 50:07.000]  JP court, no record.
[50:07.000 --> 50:08.000]  Okay.
[50:08.000 --> 50:11.000]  You only have five calendar days to get your motion for new trial in.
[50:11.000 --> 50:16.000]  If they did it today, then you've got to have it in by Monday.
[50:16.000 --> 50:18.000]  Okay.
[50:18.000 --> 50:21.000]  Motion for a new trial.
[50:21.000 --> 50:27.000]  Now, put everything in your motion for new trial that normally would have been in your special appearance
[50:27.000 --> 50:32.000]  plus the things they did at trial that deprived you of your rights.
[50:32.000 --> 50:33.000]  All right.
[50:33.000 --> 50:38.000]  Basically, you're going to assert the same arguments about the lack of jurisdiction and the lack of notice,
[50:38.000 --> 50:44.000]  but you're also going to add to that conducted a jury trial without notice of jury trial,
[50:44.000 --> 50:51.000]  basically conducting trial by ambush and so on and so forth.
[50:51.000 --> 50:54.000]  Okay. All right.
[50:54.000 --> 51:02.000]  Is there a section in the Code of Civil Procedure or a transportation code or something like that
[51:02.000 --> 51:06.000]  that would give me some insight on how to do all that?
[51:06.000 --> 51:08.000]  On how to do it?
[51:08.000 --> 51:09.000]  Yeah.
[51:09.000 --> 51:10.000]  No.
[51:10.000 --> 51:11.000]  Okay.
[51:11.000 --> 51:14.000]  If you don't know how to write a motion, then you're going to have a problem.
[51:14.000 --> 51:17.000]  Did you go in there without filing any paperwork whatsoever?
[51:17.000 --> 51:20.000]  No, I filed a lot of paperwork.
[51:20.000 --> 51:21.000]  Okay.
[51:21.000 --> 51:22.000]  I filed a lot of paperwork.
[51:22.000 --> 51:27.000]  And what kind of paperwork did you file?
[51:27.000 --> 51:34.000]  I filed a notice of process from citation to arraignment,
[51:34.000 --> 51:45.000]  defendant's motion for continuance, a notice in demand for the complaint.
[51:45.000 --> 51:51.000]  This morning I filed a, I had prepared a motion to show authority because for the city attorney,
[51:51.000 --> 51:57.000]  I filed that into the record after I saw the subpoena in the record.
[51:57.000 --> 51:59.000]  I went ahead and filed that in.
[51:59.000 --> 52:02.000]  I was going to file it after the hearing today, but I filed it today.
[52:02.000 --> 52:13.000]  I also filed a notice for presiding judge to take judicial notice and an objection and motion to set aside the complaint.
[52:13.000 --> 52:17.000]  I did receive a complaint, but I didn't receive any of the information.
[52:17.000 --> 52:22.000]  Well, in Texas, a motion to set aside has a very specific set of requirements.
[52:22.000 --> 52:25.000]  You're better off with a motion to quash.
[52:25.000 --> 52:27.000]  Oh, okay.
[52:27.000 --> 52:32.000]  And a notice in demand for information.
[52:32.000 --> 52:33.000]  Okay.
[52:33.000 --> 52:39.000]  So first and foremost, that is all covered by lack of notice.
[52:39.000 --> 52:45.000]  When they don't give you those things, that constitutes a deprivation of the right to notice.
[52:45.000 --> 52:49.000]  Never, ever tell them specifically what they're doing wrong.
[52:49.000 --> 52:50.000]  It's up to them.
[52:50.000 --> 52:55.000]  They're supposed to know the law just like they accuse you of having to know the law.
[52:55.000 --> 52:56.000]  Okay.
[52:56.000 --> 53:00.000]  So when they don't do things properly, you're just going to document it.
[53:00.000 --> 53:04.000]  Don't put in a notice demanding a complaint.
[53:04.000 --> 53:11.000]  Just simply put in your special appearance and motion to dismiss the fact that you were never given notice of the complaint.
[53:11.000 --> 53:15.000]  It was never served, nor was the information.
[53:15.000 --> 53:16.000]  All right.
[53:16.000 --> 53:23.000]  And if they didn't do that by the time you first appeared, then they're hosed.
[53:23.000 --> 53:33.000]  Because 45.018B gives you a specific statutorily granted right to have that ahead of time.
[53:33.000 --> 53:37.000]  Okay. Good.
[53:37.000 --> 53:41.000]  What about – oh, let me ask you another question.
[53:41.000 --> 53:46.000]  I got the officer's oath of office.
[53:46.000 --> 53:55.000]  I did a public information request for the oath of office for the judge, the city attorney, and the officer.
[53:55.000 --> 53:57.000]  I got all those.
[53:57.000 --> 54:12.000]  The officer's oath of office is sworn to – was sworn by and certified by the director of finance.
[54:12.000 --> 54:19.000]  Now, I looked – I searched in the transportation code, and I believe that's where I'll search.
[54:19.000 --> 54:21.000]  I looked at so many different codes.
[54:21.000 --> 54:22.000]  Well, now, wait a minute.
[54:22.000 --> 54:24.000]  You looked in the transportation code for what?
[54:24.000 --> 54:27.000]  As to who has authority to administer the oath?
[54:27.000 --> 54:28.000]  Yes.
[54:28.000 --> 54:34.000]  And I didn't see the director of finance listed in there.
[54:34.000 --> 54:35.000]  Okay.
[54:35.000 --> 54:40.000]  What oath out of the transportation code are you looking for?
[54:40.000 --> 54:44.000]  His oath of office isn't administered under the transportation code.
[54:44.000 --> 54:45.000]  Okay.
[54:45.000 --> 54:46.000]  All right.
[54:46.000 --> 54:47.000]  Well, I was mistaken.
[54:47.000 --> 54:49.000]  Where is it administered from?
[54:49.000 --> 54:58.000]  Well, by whoever has the authority to appoint them to their position, which in this case could be the mayor.
[54:58.000 --> 55:09.000]  But now in the Code of Criminal Procedure complaints, there's a list of who can certify a complaint in Chapter 45.
[55:09.000 --> 55:10.000]  Okay.
[55:10.000 --> 55:13.000]  45019F.
[55:13.000 --> 55:20.000]  Not F, but it's in there somewhere, yeah.
[55:20.000 --> 55:22.000]  What about – let's see.
[55:22.000 --> 55:27.000]  Okay.
[55:27.000 --> 55:29.000]  Maybe – the oath may be short.
[55:29.000 --> 55:30.000]  Oh, that's the complaint.
[55:30.000 --> 55:31.000]  Okay.
[55:31.000 --> 55:32.000]  All right.
[55:32.000 --> 55:38.000]  Well, anyway, the oath is signed off on by the director of finance.
[55:38.000 --> 55:40.000]  Would they have the authority to do that?
[55:40.000 --> 55:51.000]  Well, again, he's a city employee, so you'd have to find out who by law has the authority to administer the state oath at the local level for a particular job.
[55:51.000 --> 55:55.000]  You can request that information from the secretary of state or the AG's office.
[55:55.000 --> 55:59.000]  They might can tell you who would be required to administer the oath.
[55:59.000 --> 56:00.000]  All right.
[56:00.000 --> 56:01.000]  Okay.
[56:01.000 --> 56:08.000]  But the constitutional oath, it would appear to me that only specific constitutionally authorized officers can administer it.
[56:08.000 --> 56:11.000]  Okay.
[56:11.000 --> 56:18.000]  And I don't see how that could be any officer of a municipality since none of them are created by constitution.
[56:18.000 --> 56:22.000]  Well, then they're all bad.
[56:22.000 --> 56:24.000]  It's possible.
[56:24.000 --> 56:26.000]  It all depends on what the requirements are.
[56:26.000 --> 56:31.000]  We'd have to find out what the courts have said about the requirement for who is allowed to administer an oath.
[56:31.000 --> 56:41.000]  If there's no specific prohibition in the constitution as to who may do it, then who did the legislature authorize to do it?
[56:41.000 --> 56:47.000]  Okay.
[56:47.000 --> 56:52.000]  What about now that these guys have done what they've done?
[56:52.000 --> 56:56.000]  Could I file a criminal complaint?
[56:56.000 --> 56:57.000]  Absolutely.
[56:57.000 --> 57:01.000]  Judicial conduct complaints against the judge, bar grievances against the prosecutor.
[57:01.000 --> 57:05.000]  File a motion to disqualify the judge in case they try to come back.
[57:05.000 --> 57:07.000]  File your motion for new trial.
[57:07.000 --> 57:17.000]  Cite all of the violations of law and the violations of due process and the fact that you filed a motion to disqualify and judicial conduct complaints for their actions.
[57:17.000 --> 57:20.000]  Put all of that in your motion to disqualify.
[57:20.000 --> 57:23.000]  I'm sorry, your motion for new trial.
[57:23.000 --> 57:24.000]  Okay.
[57:24.000 --> 57:29.000]  What about a cross-claim or a counterclaim?
[57:29.000 --> 57:31.000]  That civil has got nothing to do with this.
[57:31.000 --> 57:39.000]  That would come after the fact when you sue them for taking you to court in the first place for malicious prosecution, among other things.
[57:39.000 --> 57:52.000]  The deprivation of rights you can sue for anyway, but you really want to make it where your case gets dismissed or thrown out or overturned so that you have malicious prosecution.
[57:52.000 --> 57:54.000]  Official oppression?
[57:54.000 --> 57:57.000]  Official oppression is not a federal action.
[57:57.000 --> 57:59.000]  Okay.
[57:59.000 --> 58:00.000]  All right.
[58:00.000 --> 58:01.000]  I've got one more question.
[58:01.000 --> 58:02.000]  I hear the music.
[58:02.000 --> 58:03.000]  You want to hold me over?
[58:03.000 --> 58:06.000]  You've got about 10 seconds to ask it.
[58:06.000 --> 58:07.000]  Okay.
[58:07.000 --> 58:15.000]  Well, what do we need to do to move the court on the rule on the motions and objections and demands that we file in the record?
[58:15.000 --> 58:18.000]  To make them rule on it?
[58:18.000 --> 58:19.000]  Yeah.
[58:19.000 --> 58:20.000]  You can't make them.
[58:20.000 --> 58:25.000]  All you can do is object to the fact that they didn't, that they never read the motions.
[58:25.000 --> 58:38.000]  Basically, you assert that they denied you due process by refusing to read your pleadings, make an informed decision and ruling on those pleadings in order to show bias toward the prosecution.
[58:38.000 --> 58:39.000]  Okay.
[58:39.000 --> 58:40.000]  That's it for me.
[58:40.000 --> 58:41.000]  All right.
[58:41.000 --> 58:42.000]  Thanks, Clyde.
[58:42.000 --> 58:43.000]  All right, folks.
[58:43.000 --> 58:46.000]  Rule of Law Radio 512-646-1984.
[58:46.000 --> 58:47.000]  Give us a call.
[58:47.000 --> 58:48.000]  Everybody, I see you.
[58:48.000 --> 58:50.000]  Y'all hang on.
[59:18.000 --> 59:19.000]  We'll be right back.
[59:48.000 --> 59:50.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.000 --> 01:00:03.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:03.000 --> 01:00:15.000]  You're listening to the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates, online at thelibertybeats.com.
[01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:19.000]  John Bush here with your Liberty Beat for Monday, August 12th, 2013.
[01:00:19.000 --> 01:00:27.000]  Rolled open today at $1,330, silver at $21.10, and bitcoin is trading at $93.59.
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:37.000]  Support for the Liberty Beat comes from Carmacazi Productions, the production house bringing you solid wood in the show, specializing in high-quality audio recording and video production for the Liberty Movement.
[01:00:37.000 --> 01:00:45.000]  Online at carmacazi.tv and from Central Texas Gunworks, CHL courses, self-defense training and firearm sales.
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:48.000]  Online at centraltexasgunworks.com.
[01:00:48.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  And now the news.
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:01:00.000]  A federal judge has ruled that the New York City Police Department's heavily criticized stop-and-frisk approach to crime fighting is unconstitutional, the New York Times reported today.
[01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  The ruling by Judge Shira A. Schindlin is the latest blow to the policy, which data suggests has not been effective in actually preventing shootings in the city while being decried for targeting black and Latino men almost exclusively.
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:27.000]  In her decision, Schindlin determined that the policy violated both the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment and appointed an outside counsel to monitor the department and make sure it moves further into compliance in the future.
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:34.000]  Elora Gellerson of Brooklyn, Maine is facing criticism and punishment by Maine health officials for her choice of baby formula.
[01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:42.000]  Gellerson was reported to the Department of Health and Human Services after informing her doctor that she had been feeding her son Carson a homemade formula using goat's milk.
[01:01:42.000 --> 01:01:47.000]  She says the state came to her house and threatened to take away her child if she did not follow her doctor's orders.
[01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:58.000]  Since the incident, Elora has complied with all of the mandates from the Department of Health and Human Services, but the state has not dropped the harassment.
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:02.000]  Bradley Balco of the Huffington Post reported on some shocking numbers recently.
[01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:11.000]  According to the FBI, in 2011, there were 3,991.1 arrests for every 100,000 people living in America.
[01:02:11.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  That means over the course of a single year, one in 25 Americans was arrested.
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  Out of that one in 25, more people were arrested for drug crimes than any other class of crimes.
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:26.000]  Bradley Balco, who recently authored the New York Times best-selling book, Rise of the Warrior Cop,
[01:02:26.000 --> 01:02:32.000]  will be speaking at the Second Annual Peaceful Streets Police Accountability Summit taking place this Saturday, August 17th,
[01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:37.000]  from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the AT&T Executive Conference Center on UT campus.
[01:02:37.000 --> 01:02:40.000]  More information at PeacefulStreets.com.
[01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  Support for the Liberty Beat comes from Brave New Books, Austin's only brick-and-mortar store carrying Tangy Tangerine 2.0,
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:52.000]  and Austin at 1904 Guadalupe Street or online at BraveNewBookstore.com.
[01:02:52.000 --> 01:03:00.000]  And from tomorrow's Meals Today, South Austin Market Days every Saturday from 3 to 7 p.m. at 10106 Manchac Road.
[01:03:00.000 --> 01:03:14.000]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty. I read His book and it says,
[01:03:14.000 --> 01:03:17.000]  God, folks, we are back.
[01:03:17.000 --> 01:03:23.000]  Okay, first the one up now. We're going to Paula in Maine. Paula, what can we do for you?
[01:03:23.000 --> 01:03:25.000]  Hi, Eddie.
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:26.000]  Hi.
[01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:31.000]  Well, you probably—hold on, I think I'm on speakerphone.
[01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:46.000]  Okay. You probably remember my husband was charged with being a felon in possession of firearms 30 years after he was convicted of a felony.
[01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:59.000]  Originally, he wanted a jury trial, but it was taken so long he finally pled guilty to charges, spent one week in jail, agreed to forfeit his gun.
[01:03:59.000 --> 01:04:07.000]  Now, all the guns taken, there was about 13 of them. Many of them belonged to our son.
[01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  And we're going to be getting a hearing in about a week—my husband's getting a hearing, the boys, our sons—to determine the ownership of the guns was theirs and hopefully give the guns back to them.
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:43.000]  Is there a way you think I can get into this hearing? Because I've already put in a motion to be an intervener in the case, to be a priority to the case, letting them know that these guns didn't just belong to my husband but to me, too, because they're marital property.
[01:04:43.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  They never responded to my motion. They did send a copy of it to my husband through his attorney. So I have that filing, and that was approximately a year ago. It's been almost a year since he spent the one week in jail.
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:06.000]  Do you have any tips for me in that hearing, what I can do if they don't let me—
[01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:24.000]  Well, again, it's a public courtroom, so they couldn't keep you out of it as far as that goes. But as far as a participant in the case, unless there's been an actual claim of the ownership and dispute of it, then they're not going to allow you to participate.
[01:05:24.000 --> 01:05:32.000]  That much I can tell you. So without knowing exactly what's in your petition, I don't know how to state that.
[01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:45.000]  But I do have a question for you. Whose definition of firearm were they relying on to go after your husband in the first place?
[01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:52.000]  Well, there is a definition, and I've read it. It's basically anything that can shoot—
[01:05:52.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  Well, that is not answering my question. I said whose definition. Are they using one that's in a state law, or are they using one from the Fed?
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  I don't think that was ever—that question was ever answered if we asked it.
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:25.000]  Well, it should have been, because that can make all the difference in the world. The federal definition of firearm does not apply to most rifles or pistols.
[01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:35.000]  In fact, it would only apply to a pistol if the pistol is smoothbore and is capable of firing a shotgun shell.
[01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  Okay. The federal definition of firearm is actually severely limited in what it applies to.
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  In other words, most gun dealers that fill out a federal firearms purchase form are committing fraud because they're listing any gun you buy as a firearm,
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:07:08.000]  when in fact it does not meet the federal requirement for the definition of a firearm to be listed on such a form, nor be extended onto a waiting period or anything else.
[01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:19.000]  So there would have to be a separate state definition they're relying on if they're going to include his hunting rifle or any handguns.
[01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:30.000]  Okay. Well, I'll let him know that, and maybe he can bring it up. However, he's already pled guilty, so I don't know at this point what he can do.
[01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:35.000]  Well, that comes from—well, I don't know what he can do after the fact on that either.
[01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  But the fact of the matter is, how do you plead to something you haven't bothered to look into far enough to fully understand it?
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  See, this is the problem with assuming you know what a word means, especially when it's being used against you in a legal proceeding.
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  Well, he was just afraid, of course, that a jury would—
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  Well, that is the other thing they count on, your fear making you stupid.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:22.000]  I recently put in a motion in my son's case to try to help him. He was facing domestic violence charges, which he was guilty of somewhat mistreating his father, but also his girlfriend, which she received nothing compared to the treatment we got, but she received—
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:28.000]  Okay. Paula, just an FYI. Don't say stuff like that on the air.
[01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:29.000]  Okay.
[01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:35.000]  Because if that gets picked up, that can be used against him and you later.
[01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:52.000]  Uh-huh. He never hit her. There were things that—okay, so anyway, I put in a motion to try to help him, try to get him—I told the judge that he had agreed to the charges only because he was coerced,
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:09:06.000]  and that he had not received due process because the very original trial, the original charge he had never received the trial for after one year, so it was an excessive amount of time to keep him under these conditions.
[01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  Denial of a speedy trial.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:24.000]  Right. And in the record, I found that the prosecutor knew that she wanted him to move into her place, but yet the charge was violating the conditions of release, which was not to see her.
[01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:43.000]  But anyway, that was his—and now he's gone to jail. He's pled guilty, and he went to jail for three months. And so anyway, regarding the gun, isn't there something I can do to say, well, look, these guns also belong to me?
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:48.000]  I've already said that, but they chose just ignore.
[01:09:48.000 --> 01:10:01.000]  Well, again, what type of hearing is this? If it's a civil proceeding over the distribution of the property, then if you have a claim against the property, I don't see why you can't get into it.
[01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:08.000]  Okay. So I should just let them know I have claimed the right to this property. You need to include me in this hearing?
[01:10:08.000 --> 01:10:14.000]  Well, yeah, about whatever legal mechanism or document that is, but yes.
[01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:20.000]  Well, it was just a filing that I put into the case.
[01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:34.000]  Well, but is it the right filing is what I'm getting at. Is there something specific you would have to do to intercede in this as a party of interest?
[01:10:34.000 --> 01:10:36.000]  That I don't know. That's what I was—
[01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:47.000]  That's what you're going to need to look at the rules and find out. And I don't know the rules in Maine enough to tell you one way or the other what to do with it.
[01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:48.000]  Okay.
[01:10:48.000 --> 01:10:49.000]  Okay.
[01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  Thank you.
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:51.000]  All right. Thanks for calling in, Paula.
[01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:59.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Jason in Texas. Jason, what can we do for you?
[01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  Paula, I could see about two issues I got going on. The first one is an open records request. I was going to see what your experiences are on that issue.
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  I sent you an email earlier. I'm not sure if you got around to it or not.
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:29.000]  I had requested some information from my local police department back in November. And the information is an accreditation document that our police department goes through.
[01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:34.000]  It's basically the standards that they are graded on to get this accreditation.
[01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:49.000]  And I was told on my first request for information that the standards I was asking for was copyrighted material, and then I can contact this agency and purchase—this third-party agency and purchase their standards.
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:58.000]  Well, I didn't take that for an answer, so I informed the clerk that that was public information, in which she came back and said, yes, it is.
[01:11:58.000 --> 01:12:06.000]  So I have to schedule a time to come in here and copy the information, because I want actual copies of the standards that they're using to get this accreditation.
[01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:17.000]  So that's where it was left at about the end of the year. I never called and scheduled to actually go make the copies of those documents.
[01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:24.000]  But now that I finally have time to, I wrote her this morning and told her that I would be ready to be there Wednesday.
[01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:28.000]  And these are, even though they're copyrighted materials, they are public information.
[01:12:28.000 --> 01:12:35.000]  And she even said in her correspondence that they have to be produced for inspection immediately.
[01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:46.000]  So if you've had any experience with carrying a copy machine in and making copies, your own copies of a document,
[01:12:46.000 --> 01:12:55.000]  because what she's trying to tell me in one sentence is they're public information, that they have to be produced for inspection immediately.
[01:12:55.000 --> 01:13:02.000]  However, if you want to bring in your copy machine, you have to make an appointment, and it's going to be at my convenience.
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:11.000]  Because her short answer to me today was, we responded to your request in November, and Wednesday is not a good day.
[01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:15.000]  I'll let you know when a good time is to come in.
[01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  Well, it depends on what kind of inconvenience they're trying to assert that you would make on their office.
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:28.000]  If what you're doing is no more an inconvenience than it would have been showing up and getting the demand in place at that moment,
[01:13:28.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  they can't deny you access to it. I would just go in and say, look, I'm here to get the look at this information and make my copies.
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:41.000]  Now, based upon the information you sent me, they agreed to let you make the copies if you brought your own copier.
[01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  Right.
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:47.000]  Okay. So I would just go in there. Don't let them dictate what the schedule is.
[01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:55.000]  If they can give it to you on demand on any other day, there's no reason they can't give it to you on demand on a day when you come ready to make copies.
[01:13:55.000 --> 01:14:04.000]  You're right. Okay. And really, the whole hang-up for me is Hearst trying to set that schedule versus letting me make those copies immediately.
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:09.000]  Well, don't tell them you're there to make copies. Just tell them you're there to look at the information and make it while you have it.
[01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:16.000]  And then if they try to interfere with your making of copies or prevent you from making further copies, then go after them for it.
[01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  All right. There's a document out there called the Public Information Made Easy. It's put out by the Attorney General's Office.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:29.000]  And question 30 in there is do requesters have a right to bring in their own copier to make copies of public records?
[01:14:29.000 --> 01:14:34.000]  And it gives four criteria. And the only exception is that it would be unreasonably disruptive,
[01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:39.000]  causing a safety hazard, interfere with others' rights to inspect or copy the record,
[01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:45.000]  or number four, if the requested records contain confidential information which needs to be redacted.
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:50.000]  And none of those apply. So I plan on showing up on Wednesday.
[01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:54.000]  And this moves into the second part of the first question.
[01:14:54.000 --> 01:15:05.000]  I was going to walk in there and I've heard Randy say it a couple of times where he will approach a sheriff's deputy or a police officer
[01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:12.000]  and say, hey, I have reason to believe that my access to these records will be obstructed when you come over here with me and witness this.
[01:15:12.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  Right. And there's no reason why you can't do that.
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:18.000]  Okay. All right.
[01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:24.000]  What I do is I have a written demand that I give them. It's not a PIR.
[01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:30.000]  It's just an actual double-sided notice that you get to them and say, look, I'm here to get these public records.
[01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  You don't want to give them to me? Go give this to the judge.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:38.000]  Let the judge tell you not to do this and then I can come after both of you.
[01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:44.000]  But in the meantime, here's a criminal penalty for you blocking my access in any way, shape, or form.
[01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  And I would show that to the officer before I took it over there and delivered it to them and said, I need to see these, please.
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:52.000]  All right.
[01:15:52.000 --> 01:15:56.000]  Now, if you like, I can email you a copy of that. That's not a problem.
[01:15:56.000 --> 01:15:59.000]  Absolutely. I'll send you an email here pretty quick.
[01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:00.000]  Okay.
[01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:10.000]  It does say at the end of this document, public information made easy that somebody who denies you that access is called failure to give access to public information.
[01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:14.000]  That has a fine of up to $1,000 and six months in jail.
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:20.000]  And it says additionally, the Public Information Act states that this violation constitutes official misconduct.
[01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  That's not all it does.
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:24.000]  It's actually got two criminal penalties down there.
[01:16:24.000 --> 01:16:27.000]  Official misconduct is just one of them.
[01:16:27.000 --> 01:16:29.000]  Right.
[01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:32.000]  And the notice that I have deals with both.
[01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  Okay. That'll work.
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:36.000]  I've got one more question I'll hold over to you this time.
[01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:38.000]  Okay. Hang on, Jason.
[01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:43.000]  All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:48.000]  I do have a pretty loaded board, but I got 45 minutes to try to deal with it.
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:49.000]  So we'll see what we can do.
[01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  All right.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  Hannibal, Don, Rob, Doug, Jason, all y'all hang on.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  We will be right back after the break.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:10.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  Capital Coin features a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:21.000]  In addition to providing the best prices in the nation, we want to bring you the best shopping experience both in-store and online.
[01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  In addition to coins and bullion, we carry popular Young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:34.000]  We offer freeze-dried storable foods by Augustin Farms, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  You can lock in a spot price with our Silver Pool, and we set up metals IRA accounts.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440 for more details.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:52.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:52.000 --> 01:17:58.000]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  Beyond Tangy Tangerine is available at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Burnett Road Suite A.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  The bookstore also carries the works of Dr. Joel Wallach, founder of Young Jeopardy and creator of Beyond Tangy Tangerine.
[01:19:22.000 --> 01:19:31.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:35.000]  This is Rule Law Radio, and we're going back to Jason in Texas.
[01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:36.000]  All right, Jason.
[01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:38.000]  All right, second and last thing.
[01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  Last time I was up there for your class, I guess it was in May.
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:48.000]  I guess about a couple weeks after that class, I got a love letter in the mail from the toll troll up there on 183A.
[01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:53.000]  It was a toll way that I didn't know I was going down, and I called you about it.
[01:19:53.000 --> 01:20:01.000]  I'm on my second notice now, and I did not respond to their initial request for funding.
[01:20:01.000 --> 01:20:11.000]  So my question, would my response to them of the non-engaging commerce, would that be untimely at this point?
[01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:12.000]  No.
[01:20:12.000 --> 01:20:18.000]  Okay, because it never applied to begin with, so therefore there was no duty to.
[01:20:18.000 --> 01:20:29.000]  Well, the first thing you want to do is send them a PIR asking them, is one penny of this toll road funded with public funds?
[01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:32.000]  Mm-hmm.
[01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:35.000]  If it is, they cannot charge the general public for access to that road.
[01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:37.000]  It's our road.
[01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:43.000]  They can only charge commercial use of that road for fees.
[01:20:43.000 --> 01:20:47.000]  Now, I don't care how many people in the legislature want to argue we didn't write it that way.
[01:20:47.000 --> 01:20:48.000]  Sorry, folks.
[01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:52.000]  That's just the rights of the people versus their government.
[01:20:52.000 --> 01:21:05.000]  We don't give you taxes to pay for the building of the road so that you could turn around and charge us more money to use those same roads for somebody else's private gain.
[01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:07.000]  That's just not happening.
[01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:08.000]  I agree.
[01:21:08.000 --> 01:21:14.000]  And have you had any experience with the Municipal Services Board?
[01:21:14.000 --> 01:21:16.000]  Not directly, no.
[01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:17.000]  Okay.
[01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:25.000]  They're the private company that handles all that for the whatever transportation authority that's doing that as far as the toll roads go.
[01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  All right.
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  Well, I'll send them that information request and go from there.
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:32.000]  And I'll be emailing you shortly here for that form letter you're talking about.
[01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:33.000]  Okay.
[01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:34.000]  Thanks for the info, sir.
[01:21:34.000 --> 01:21:35.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:36.000]  All right.
[01:21:36.000 --> 01:21:39.000]  Now, we're going to go to Hannibal in New York.
[01:21:39.000 --> 01:21:42.000]  Hannibal, how's the fava beans?
[01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:45.000]  All right.
[01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:47.000]  How have you been, Eddie?
[01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  All right.
[01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  And you?
[01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:49.000]  I've been good.
[01:21:49.000 --> 01:21:51.000]  I got some good news over here in New York.
[01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:52.000]  Okay.
[01:21:52.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  Well, that's good.
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:54.000]  New York sank?
[01:21:54.000 --> 01:21:55.000]  Yeah.
[01:21:55.000 --> 01:22:04.000]  Stop and frisk was what I was saying a long time ago, it's found to be unconstitutional.
[01:22:04.000 --> 01:22:08.000]  Well, that isn't exactly what the federal judge said.
[01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  The federal judge said it was unconstitutional only because it was used for racial profiling.
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:20.000]  When in fact she never brought up the fact that it be in an unlawful search and seizure at all,
[01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  she only did it based upon the racial profiling point is what I read on it.
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  So it's not as clear-cut a victory as you would like it to be, though it does upset Bloomberg to no end.
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  I agree.
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  And it will put a stop to it momentarily until they figure out how to get around it.
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  But the fact is until it is ruled that it is not allowed, period, it's not going to cease and desist.
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:53.000]  Yeah.
[01:22:53.000 --> 01:23:06.000]  But what I've also been saying was that they had no evidence that it applies because it violates the core of what the Constitution says,
[01:23:06.000 --> 01:23:09.000]  what the republic is supposed to be.
[01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:16.000]  And how are they going to apply an opinion to someone else?
[01:23:16.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  It doesn't seem to add up.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  It's like you tell me I can't do this because you say so, but I'm not hurting anybody.
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:27.000]  Well, but that's the whole thing.
[01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:32.000]  It's always because somebody says so.
[01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:34.000]  I never agree with that.
[01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  Folks, if you all haven't had an opportunity yet, you all need to get on.
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:45.000]  I don't know if you're members of Facebook or not, everybody, but if you do, and I'm not saying stay on it all the time by any means,
[01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:49.000]  but we are using Facebook to publicize the Tile of Law site.
[01:23:49.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  Now, if you go on and you send me a friend request and you look at one of the last postings I made,
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:01.000]  I posted what I would recommend as a new form of our Pledge of Allegiance versus the old one.
[01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:11.000]  Yes, it's longer, but it makes it a whole lot clearer about what we should be pledging to and why versus what the old one does.
[01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:14.000]  In my mind, it just simply makes more sense.
[01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:23.000]  So if you do go out there, send a friend request to Tile, T-A-O, space, law, L-A-W, and I'll be happy to accept you on board
[01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:30.000]  so you can watch what's getting posted there because there's a lot of good information getting aired out there.
[01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:33.000]  So it would be good to have as many people on it as possible.
[01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:45.000]  But yeah, Hannibal, don't count your chickens just yet because if they figure out a way to revamp the application and implementation,
[01:24:45.000 --> 01:24:49.000]  they may be able to circumvent that federal ruling anyway.
[01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  Yeah.
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  All they have to do is prove it wasn't being used for profiling,
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:25:05.000]  and some other federal higher court will put it right back where it was and you're right back to being subjected to illegal stops and searches.
[01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  Yeah, that's my cup of tea.
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  But, you know, I wasn't sure if you were aware, but you're obviously aware.
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:16.000]  Yeah, I am, but I appreciate the info nonetheless.
[01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  It shows I'm not the only one reading what's going on.
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:24.000]  Yeah, but I've already sent you a friend request.
[01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  I'm already...
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  Yeah, I'm just talking in case we've got any new listeners or people that haven't heard it before.
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:34.000]  All right.
[01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:35.000]  Okay.
[01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:36.000]  All right.
[01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:37.000]  All right.
[01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  Thanks, Hannibal.
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:39.000]  Thank you.
[01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:40.000]  You're welcome.
[01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:42.000]  All right.
[01:25:42.000 --> 01:25:43.000]  Now we're going to go to Don in Indiana.
[01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:45.000]  Don, what can we do for you?
[01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:57.000]  Oh, Eddie, I've got to quit. At the beginning of your program, you mentioned forced contracts, and I'm kind of scared talking on the phone here like this.
[01:25:57.000 --> 01:26:04.000]  I've listened to you for years, but I have very seldom called in.
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:14.000]  About five years ago, my mother passed away, and I inherited this house here in Corona, Indiana.
[01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  And I've gone up to the town meetings.
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:18.000]  They have a little...
[01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:20.000]  They have a town meeting up there.
[01:26:20.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  They have about four board members and an attorney.
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:34.000]  And I asked them about the town charter, how I could get in contact with that and find it.
[01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  They didn't...
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  Even the attorney, he couldn't even tell me where to find a town charter.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:54.000]  And on this water here, when my mother passed away, she changed over from the well to the municipal water system they put in.
[01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  They put in a tower.
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:27:02.000]  The population is probably under 500 in this little town.
[01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:15.000]  And they tell me that after I moved in here and I started paying a water bill, the water is just terrible, full of chlorine and fluoride in it.
[01:27:15.000 --> 01:27:17.000]  You can't hardly drink it.
[01:27:17.000 --> 01:27:25.000]  And I'm 77 years old, and I've had a couple of heart attacks and about three strokes.
[01:27:25.000 --> 01:27:40.000]  And they tell me that you can't put down a new well and disconnect from their city water or town water and their sewer system.
[01:27:40.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  Mainly it's the water coming in I'd like to get rid of and put down a new well if I could.
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:52.000]  And they say I can't do that because I'm under contract with them.
[01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:55.000]  I never signed a contract with them.
[01:27:55.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  And they can't seem to find the one that my mother had signed.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:06.000]  Well, if they're asserting a contract, they bear the burden of proof of producing the contract.
[01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:07.000]  Yeah.
[01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  I asked at the town board, you know, about it.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:11.000]  They couldn't find it.
[01:28:11.000 --> 01:28:14.000]  They looked and looked and looked the next day or so.
[01:28:14.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  They couldn't find it.
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:22.000]  And but can they force me not to disconnect from that city water?
[01:28:22.000 --> 01:28:23.000]  Well, absolutely not.
[01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:32.000]  Well, the city water is a paid service, and you have the right to refuse to accept a paid service from anybody.
[01:28:32.000 --> 01:28:33.000]  Okay.
[01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:34.000]  I didn't know about that.
[01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  That's what I wanted to call in and ask you about.
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  And I have another question here, though.
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:46.000]  They have a what do you call it, code enforcement officer.
[01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:53.000]  I think he's a retired chief or something from Kendallville, which is about seven miles down the road.
[01:28:53.000 --> 01:28:58.000]  And they tell me he don't have no oath of office.
[01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:02.000]  And I figured he'd have to have an oath of office.
[01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:10.000]  I can't find out. Nobody seems to know. And he never, never shows up at a town meeting or anything.
[01:29:10.000 --> 01:29:22.000]  And I can't get a hold. I thought if I get a hold of that town charter, maybe I could find out if he's supposed to have an oath of office or not.
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:25.000]  Well, is he required to have one?
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:27.000]  With that, I don't know.
[01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:32.000]  I just figured he probably did have to.
[01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:38.000]  Well, if he's considered any form of public officer that is required to have an oath, then he does.
[01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  You just have to find the rule that binds him to it.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  All right, Don, we're going to go to break. You hang on. We'll be right back, okay?
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  All right, Eddie.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  I've got about a half an hour left and a couple of other callers after dawn.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:54.000]  So hopefully I'll get everybody done.
[01:29:54.000 --> 01:29:56.000]  And if you can get in before then, good luck.
[01:29:56.000 --> 01:30:01.000]  We'll be right back after the break.
[01:30:01.000 --> 01:30:08.000]  Shakespeare's classic play, The Taming of the Shrew, implies women need the firm hand of a man to behave appropriately.
[01:30:08.000 --> 01:30:12.000]  But researchers say women are really the ones doing the taming.
[01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell you more in just a moment.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:23.000]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:24.000]  That's creepy.
[01:30:24.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  It doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:29.000]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:29.000 --> 01:30:35.000]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:39.000]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:48.000]  When men behave badly, don't put them in prison.
[01:30:48.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  Send them to the altar.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:54.000]  Studies show that married men are less aggressive and commit fewer crimes.
[01:30:54.000 --> 01:31:00.000]  One study of high-risk boys in adulthood found that marriage reduced their criminal behaviors by 35%.
[01:31:00.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  Women are more likely to marry nice guys, which might account for some of the better behavior of married men.
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:12.000]  But studies of identical twin brothers prove that even when factoring out genetics, men do mellow out after saying, I do.
[01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:18.000]  Married twins exhibit 30% less antisocial behavior than their unmarried brothers.
[01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:24.000]  It seems women have a calming effect on their husbands and help them find more positive social outlets.
[01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  Here at Zombie Killer Ammo and Guns, we believe that the Second Amendment guarantees our rights as citizens to be able to defend ourselves and our loved ones.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  We also believe that the right to carry weapons comes with the responsibility of being safe and smart about guns.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  So if you're going to be in the Corpus Christi area, give us a call at 361-704-6103.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  Ask for Chris or Portia and mention this radio ad for a 10% discount.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:32:00.000]  We can ship ammo, parts, and accessories. Like us on Facebook at Zombie Killers, LLC.
[01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:09.000]  Nutritious food is real body armor. It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:32:09.000 --> 01:32:17.000]  Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States and classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind a marijuana plant?
[01:32:17.000 --> 01:32:23.000]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years, and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:32:23.000 --> 01:32:30.000]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp. They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:32:30.000 --> 01:32:39.000]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:48.000]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:32:48.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at HempUSA.org.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:12.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:12.000 --> 01:33:41.000]  All right, folks, we are back. We're going to finish up with Don in Indiana.
[01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  All right, Don.
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:59.000]  Okay, Eddie. I was going to tell you this. I ordered a pure pore water filter off of Alex Jones's website, and it cost me about, was around $500, I think.
[01:33:59.000 --> 01:34:12.000]  And I was wondering if I'd go up to the water company, and I know if you get behind on your water bill, you know, they charge you an extra fee for that.
[01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:24.000]  I wanted to see if I could charge them for having to buy the water filter, four-gallon water filter to filter this fluoride out of the water.
[01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  Because our neighbors around here, like I say, I'm 77 years old, and I've had a few heart attacks and two or three strokes now, and not the best health getting around.
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:53.000]  And let's see, if I could make them pay me what I had to pay for this filter, it was pretty expensive for me.
[01:34:53.000 --> 01:34:57.000]  Yeah, unless you sue somebody and win.
[01:34:57.000 --> 01:34:59.000]  Yeah, if you sue somebody, you'd say.
[01:34:59.000 --> 01:35:07.000]  Yeah, you'd have to sue somebody and win to get a judgment in them for the cost of what you had to pay because of what they did, but you'd have to prove they did it.
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:12.000]  Yeah. But you mean putting fluoride in the water?
[01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:21.000]  Yeah. Ultimately, you'd have to find who initiated that, prove that it was responsible for your health problems, and etc., etc., etc.
[01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  So you're saying the movement in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is on you for every single thing you're asserting.
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:34.000]  Doesn't the state force them to put that chlorine and fluoride in?
[01:35:34.000 --> 01:35:36.000]  Not relevant to the issue.
[01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  Can you first prove that that is the direct link to your health issues?
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:52.000]  Well, I keep getting emails from some organization that's telling about how that fluoride causes cancer.
[01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  Yeah, and I can say that looking at the moon will make you grow hair in the back of your eyeballs, but then how do I prove it?
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:01.000]  Yeah.
[01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:13.000]  Okay. The point is, yeah, they're right, but you still have to prove that in a court of law in order to show standing to assert a claim of harm.
[01:36:13.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  Oh, okay. Let's see, what else have I got here? I'll probably think I would have to hang up, but about the water, the town charter, I think that's probably about got it, Eddie.
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  Okay. Well, thanks for calling in, Don.
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:34.000]  Okay. Thank you very much, Eddie.
[01:36:34.000 --> 01:36:35.000]  You're welcome.
[01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:36.000]  We'll be clear.
[01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  All right, sir.
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Doug in Texas. Doug, what can we do for you?
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:37:01.000]  Well, hi, Eddie, in Texas. I was over at Sprouts. That's a health food store on Manchac in Wheat Canyon, and I saw this little ape in there with the Travis County Constable Department,
[01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:09.000]  and she had some lady out of her little mini ring in, and she was writing her tickets and this and that and the other.
[01:37:09.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  I parked, went in there, got some supplements, and I was doing lunch there. I was eating my supplements and doing lunch, and then she pulls up a light behind me with her little things flashing.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:42.000]  She wasn't exactly interested in me, but the guy that parked behind me, she was over there writing him a bunch of tickets or whatever.
[01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:56.000]  So I just walked in the store and came back out, and I still couldn't leave. My egress was obstructed for quite a while.
[01:37:56.000 --> 01:38:09.000]  And then when the lady, the deputy constable, pulled off, I just politely walked over to her and said, I know it's none of my business, but what in hell was she doing over here?
[01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:19.000]  And she said, well, she was writing me a ticket for expired inspection on my truck.
[01:38:19.000 --> 01:38:35.000]  And I told him, I said, are you aware of the fact that the constables, their only traffic enforcement empowerment is assisting at a waste station?
[01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:43.000]  And I just said that. I just blurted that out. And I wonder if I heard that from you or Randy.
[01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  You heard that from me.
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:46.000]  Okay.
[01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  I'm fairly certain.
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:56.000]  Well, I figured I did. You know, I was fairly certain that I heard that from you too, Eddie.
[01:38:56.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  And that's true. Under the administrative code, that's the only authority given for traffic enforcement to a constable is that they can participate in a waste station.
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:30.000]  Well, I didn't take this one for all the information. And I was certain that I heard it from you, but you know, I'm getting kind of out of it, you know. My head early on said Alzheimer's or whatever. Maybe I heard that from Randy, which I wouldn't.
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  No, I actually remember the discussion Randy and I had when I brought that up to him. That actually surprised him.
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:40:00.000]  Yeah, well, you know, I was, you know, I was spot on with that. I said that's what, that's the limit to their traffic enforcement capabilities or authority or whatever is to assist in a waste station.
[01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:10.000]  And we're obviously not in a waste station here. And I guess that's interesting.
[01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:11.000]  Yeah.
[01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:12.000]  Okay.
[01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:16.000]  All right. Well, we're in court.
[01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:23.000]  I just want to check with you. I would bet the farm on that.
[01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:40.000]  Yeah. If you go back and check that rule 4.13 out of subchapter B of the administrative code under Title 37, Doug, you will find that that's the only authority granted for traffic enforcement to constables.
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  I don't have a photographic memory, but I trust you. You know, I know you've got it going on. That's why I wouldn't call it photographic. More like one of the old fashioned things they used to use in school to make copies.
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:06.000]  You put an imprint on the drum and it'll stay there as long as you're making copies.
[01:41:06.000 --> 01:41:10.000]  I think they call them a lithograph.
[01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  Yeah.
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:14.000]  You're not that old lady.
[01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  Oh, yes, I am too.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  I'm old enough to be your father.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:21.000]  I don't know about that, Doug.
[01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  Or the club.
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:29.000]  If I started really young, that could be your father.
[01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:34.000]  You'd have to start real young.
[01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:44.000]  Okay, Ed, I just want to tell you that because I told that guy, this lady's out here writing all these tickets and everything.
[01:41:44.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  Yeah.
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:55.000]  And it's not just there. I've seen it other places. I take care of rental properties and I see these constables stopping people all over the road.
[01:41:55.000 --> 01:42:05.000]  And I'm thinking, what in the hell's going on? They did that down in Bastrop County. They had like nine of them out of Elgin.
[01:42:05.000 --> 01:42:12.000]  They were writing speeding tickets on one of the market roads.
[01:42:12.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  I don't know what stopped that, but something did because they disbanded their nine little mercenaries that were trying to collect revenue.
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:34.000]  Apparently, somebody got figured out what was going on and put a stop to it.
[01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:45.000]  But it's a little surprise, you know, just cruising that parking lot. And I stopped at, you know, H-E-B or whatever.
[01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:52.000]  And I just noticed you got little stickers out of there.
[01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:56.000]  Nothing matters. I just write mine off.
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:43:11.000]  They can't, there is no ticket they can give you for having an expired, they can give you a ticket for an expired, you know, expired ticket,
[01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  but they can't give you one for not having one. And that's just the way it is.
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:22.000]  Well, again, provided you're in commerce.
[01:43:22.000 --> 01:43:27.000]  Well, I wouldn't think of doing anything other than being in commerce, would you?
[01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:32.000]  I would. Most days.
[01:43:32.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  All right, Doug, anything else?
[01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  All right. Okay, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  We only got one segment left. I will get the rest of these callers on the other side, so y'all hang in there.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  We'll be right back, folks, so y'all be good and listen in.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:06.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy.
[01:44:06.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  And neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Brave New Books?
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:20.000]  Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:24.000]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  By UT, there's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:42.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK Parking Facility,
[01:44:42.000 --> 01:44:44.000]  just behind the bookstore.
[01:44:44.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:52.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM, and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays.
[01:44:52.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503, or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:08.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:08.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:20.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:20.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:35.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:44.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:50.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:50.000 --> 01:45:53.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:53.000 --> 01:46:15.000]  Visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:15.000 --> 01:46:19.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:19.000 --> 01:46:24.000]  All right, I had a couple people drop off the board since this is my last segment.
[01:46:24.000 --> 01:46:26.000]  I'll see if I can finish up with the two I got.
[01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:29.000]  I got Rob in New Mexico and Rob in Illinois.
[01:46:29.000 --> 01:46:32.000]  Rob in New Mexico, what can I do for you?
[01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:40.000]  Hey, Eddie, I want to know what is the best way to protect my rights while I am operating a commercial vehicle,
[01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:43.000]  and what's the applicability of the transportation script for that?
[01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:50.000]  Okay, well, the issue is the state cannot compel you to waive a right to exercise a privilege,
[01:46:50.000 --> 01:46:54.000]  nor can they convert the exercise of a right into a crime.
[01:46:54.000 --> 01:46:58.000]  Those are both federal court cases, supreme, in fact.
[01:46:58.000 --> 01:47:01.000]  They simply can't do it.
[01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:09.000]  Just because you acquiesce to get a license and they say that you have to waive your rights to protect your rights
[01:47:09.000 --> 01:47:14.000]  and not give out anything that can be used against you, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera,
[01:47:14.000 --> 01:47:21.000]  they can't convert the exercise of that right into something they can punish you for.
[01:47:21.000 --> 01:47:31.000]  And that was one of the issues that got going on in a case right now where they charged a person for two offenses
[01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:35.000]  simply not producing the documentation on demand.
[01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:43.000]  So they're specifically saying not giving us information that we can use against you is now a crime.
[01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:52.000]  Well, sorry, you can't convert my right of not giving you that information into a crime and use it against me.
[01:47:52.000 --> 01:47:54.000]  It doesn't matter whether you're commercial or not.
[01:47:54.000 --> 01:47:59.000]  They can't compel you to waive that right to suit them.
[01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:09.000]  Okay. And follow-up to that is in the 49 CFR, I do not find the words firearm, gun, rifle.
[01:48:09.000 --> 01:48:13.000]  You won't. Firearms in Title 18.
[01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:20.000]  Okay. Is that prohibited in a commercial motor vehicle under Title 18?
[01:48:20.000 --> 01:48:22.000]  No, it's not prohibited.
[01:48:22.000 --> 01:48:30.000]  But again, the requirement there comes into whether or not they're trying to link the firearm,
[01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:40.000]  if it meets the requirements of a firearm, into transportation so as to make it subject to the Interstate Commerce Clause.
[01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:50.000]  So what would be the best way to protect my right to carry a pistol or a rifle in a commercial motor vehicle?
[01:48:50.000 --> 01:48:55.000]  Well, technically speaking, I don't know of any law that prohibits it at all.
[01:48:55.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  I can't find one.
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:05.000]  But now in Illinois, Illinois has specific laws that they've made that say you can't have a gun anywhere.
[01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:13.000]  Well, if that couldn't fly in D.C., then it certainly cannot fly in Illinois.
[01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:22.000]  Now, you'd have to go back and review, but I believe Heller makes it where you can have it in the home, but I don't think it addressed it being in a car.
[01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:27.000]  And especially I don't think it addressed a commercial vehicle.
[01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:35.000]  Right. And then because I live in the truck, would the sleeper berth of the truck be considered my home?
[01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:42.000]  Again, you'd have to check federal case law on that because they consider something like that not the same thing as your home,
[01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:46.000]  though God knows why. Your property is your property.
[01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:49.000]  It should not matter whether it's mobile or anything else.
[01:49:49.000 --> 01:49:55.000]  To say that because it's in the public, it is public, is stupid.
[01:49:55.000 --> 01:50:00.000]  Why? Because the interior is not public.
[01:50:00.000 --> 01:50:11.000]  Just like the interior of my house is not public, even though the rest of it is in the public.
[01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  If I keep the curtain of the sleeper berth closed and put up a no trespass sign.
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:25.000]  Again, you would have to go to the case law on the subject matter to find out how that's going to work one way or the other.
[01:50:25.000 --> 01:50:32.000]  I've never specifically researched it as it relates to commercial truck drivers who actually live within their trucks.
[01:50:32.000 --> 01:50:39.000]  So that's some research you would have to start.
[01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:42.000]  All right. I'm done. Thank you.
[01:50:42.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  You're welcome. Thanks for calling in.
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:45.000]  You're welcome.
[01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:50.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Rob in Illinois. Rob, what can we do for you?
[01:50:50.000 --> 01:50:54.000]  Hello. This is Rob, more specifically from the Chicagoland area.
[01:50:54.000 --> 01:51:01.000]  Yeah, I have two little things to go over with you real fast, and I want to get your comment one at a time on them.
[01:51:01.000 --> 01:51:04.000]  And that was first would be the definition of a firearm.
[01:51:04.000 --> 01:51:11.000]  And the second would be the Freedom of Information Act request, which I think down in Texas is the public information request.
[01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:22.000]  So the first one, about six months ago, I inquired with the Secretary of State of Illinois for their definition that the state is using for a firearm.
[01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  And I received it, and it's according to the Illinois Revised Statutes of 1969, the State Bar Association Edition.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:38.000]  And it says containing the general and permanent laws of Illinois, blah, blah, blah, so on and so forth.
[01:51:38.000 --> 01:51:48.000]  And it says right here that the definitions of a firearm are – there's only four different definitions of a firearm.
[01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  And it's funny that you brought up earlier about how when people go to buy these guns – correct me if I'm wrong – that they're writing firearms, you know,
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:52:01.000]  that it's a firearm and all these sales receipts or whatever, and they're not a firearm.
[01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:12.000]  And I can't go into any gun store in Illinois and buy a firearm because they don't sell any of these four different definitions of a firearm.
[01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:15.000]  So that is from the 1969.
[01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:17.000]  You can do that.
[01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:19.000]  You can also email me a copy of it if you like.
[01:52:19.000 --> 01:52:20.000]  Sure.
[01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:21.000]  I'll email you a copy.
[01:52:21.000 --> 01:52:31.000]  Real quick, the definition of firearm, it's in 83, 1.1 definitions, subsection 1.1.
[01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:44.000]  Number one, any pneumatic gun, spring gun, or BB gun which expels a single globular projectile not exceeding 18 inch in diameter.
[01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  The second definition, any device used exclusively for signaling or safety and required or recommended by the United States Coast Guard or the Interstate Commerce Commission.
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:53:08.000]  Or number three, any device used exclusively for the firing of stud cartridges, explosive rivets, or similar industrial ammunition.
[01:53:08.000 --> 01:53:19.000]  And finally, number four, an antique firearm and in parentheses, other than a machine gun, which although designed as a weapon,
[01:53:19.000 --> 01:53:27.000]  the Department of Public Safety finds by reason of the date of its manufacturer value design and other characteristics is primarily a collector's item
[01:53:27.000 --> 01:53:31.000]  and is not likely to be used as a weapon.
[01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:36.000]  And then it goes on to the definitions of firearm ammunition, which I won't get into right now.
[01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:41.000]  But it's, I've read and I think it's a Code of Federal Regulations.
[01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:43.000]  I think it's, don't quote me on this.
[01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:56.000]  I think it's Title 27, Section 479.11 is another area that defines the definition of firearms along with I think Title 26.
[01:53:56.000 --> 01:54:01.000]  So I thought I'd maybe get any comment on the definition there.
[01:54:01.000 --> 01:54:07.000]  Okay. Well, I mean, doesn't sound like anything they're writing down as a firearm or charging people with, does it?
[01:54:07.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  No. It's amazing what their definitions are and how they don't match up with what's being sold in stores.
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:24.000]  So if you're going to carry a gun in your car in Illinois or on you, then you need to keep a copy of that statute that defines what firearm is.
[01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:34.000]  Right. And does this not only, this only applies to state employees while they're on the job and those who contract with the state?
[01:54:34.000 --> 01:54:37.000]  Well, what is it in?
[01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:47.000]  Well, I'm saying that these codes, the only people who are bound to these codes are the actual state employees and the people who contract with the state.
[01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:55.000]  No. A statute in a code regulates a particular regulable activity.
[01:54:55.000 --> 01:55:04.000]  It applies to anyone that is engaged in the regulated activity.
[01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:09.000]  It's not just a who, it's a what.
[01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:14.000]  You have to be doing the what in order to be a who.
[01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:21.000]  Okay. Let Dr. Seuss put that one to rhyme.
[01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:25.000]  Exactly. Thanks for the clarification on that.
[01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:28.000]  Also, there I put in a FOIA request.
[01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:31.000]  I've been putting a lot of them in lately.
[01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:42.000]  And the response was by this one non-constitutional agency, because I've been reading a lot of Charles Wiseman books lately for the past year and learning about this stuff,
[01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:51.000]  is that they claim that they could not divulge the information because of the safety of the state employees.
[01:55:51.000 --> 01:55:54.000]  Is it exempted by your Public Information Act?
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:57.000]  I have yet to look that up.
[01:55:57.000 --> 01:56:01.000]  Yeah. Find that out. If it's not exempted, they can't make that claim.
[01:56:01.000 --> 01:56:12.000]  Right. And my point is that how could this person, who is the FOIA officer for this non-constitutional agency that claims to be part of our government,
[01:56:12.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  say that based upon he's going to take on the responsibility of saying that, well, I'm going to protect these state employees, you know, their safety,
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:31.000]  how can he make that claim, go ahead and make that claim that I'm going to or me or anybody else wishes to bring harm on these people just by putting in a FOIA request?
[01:56:31.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  I think that's a pretty heavy presumption.
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  Well, yeah, it is, unless you've got something to back it up with, which is what?
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:45.000]  Well, yeah, you mean following up on the-
[01:56:45.000 --> 01:56:50.000]  No, he's making an assertion. What is his authority for making that assertion?
[01:56:50.000 --> 01:56:59.000]  Again, if it's not exempted by the Public Records Act, if it's not specifically protected by the Public Records Act,
[01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:05.000]  then the only other thing that would make it where they didn't have to turn it over would be an AG opinion.
[01:57:05.000 --> 01:57:12.000]  If they don't have any of those things, then without an AG's opinion, at least that's the way it works here in Texas,
[01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:20.000]  without an AG's opinion saying whether it doesn't have to be turned over, then they don't have a choice.
[01:57:20.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  That determination is not left up to the records keeper.
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:30.000]  It's left up to a higher authority than the records keeper, which is usually the state AG.
[01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:36.000]  Right. Yeah, because no matter what it is, no matter how they refuse it,
[01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:42.000]  and I'm going to get back into the FOIA, all the regulations, as far as what they can't,
[01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:50.000]  the restrictions on answering this stuff, but yeah, that doesn't matter what they say. You got to go after them.
[01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:56.000]  Yeah, the AG would still have to show that it's covered under the Public Information Act
[01:57:56.000 --> 01:58:00.000]  as something that is not required to be released under the Act.
[01:58:00.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  If he can't do that in his opinion, well, then the records officer can't say that they can't give it to him.
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:10.000]  Correct. Well, thank you, Eddie.
[01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:12.000]  You're very welcome. Thanks for calling in.
[01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  All right. This is million-dollar information, I'll tell you.
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:19.000]  Well, I'm glad people are finding it useful. I try to be accurate with it.
[01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:24.000]  All right, folks. This has been the Rule of Law Radio, Monday Night Traffic Show, and your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:29.000]  Thank you all so much for listening. Thank you all so much for your support.
[01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:35.000]  May you have a really blessed week, and again, thanks for being here. Good night and God bless.
[01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:05.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:05.000 --> 01:59:09.000]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:12.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:12.000 --> 01:59:21.000]  Call us toll-free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:26.000]  This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll-free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:50.000]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:50.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.