ROL_2013-04-12_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:18.360 --> 00:25.360]  2013. Gold opened today at $1,558, silver at $27.55, and bitcoin is trading at $70.
[00:25.360 --> 00:31.440]  Today's edition of The Liberty Beat is sponsored in part by tomorrowsmealstoday.com, South
[00:31.440 --> 00:37.440]  Austin Market Days every Saturday from 3 to 7 p.m. at 10106 Manchac Road, and by Silver
[00:37.440 --> 00:42.440]  Circle Movies, special screening Thursday, April 18th at Flix Brewhouse in Round Rock,
[00:42.440 --> 00:48.040]  Texas. Information at silvercirclemovie.com. And now the news, Russia Today reports that
[00:48.040 --> 00:53.360]  16-year-old American student Justin Hallman was visited at his home residence by agents
[00:53.360 --> 00:58.040]  of the Federal Bureau of Investigation after they were apprised of his report posted on
[00:58.040 --> 01:02.880]  YouTube for his high school government class. That report, for which Hallman earned an A-plus
[01:02.880 --> 01:07.760]  grade and strong accolades from his government teacher, Mr. Sparks, led to questioning by
[01:07.760 --> 01:13.000]  agents about why he chose to address certain topics. After a brief period of interrogation
[01:13.000 --> 01:17.360]  by the unmanned federal agents, they asked Hallman that he join their ranks as an undercover
[01:17.360 --> 01:23.520]  agent to spy on Americans who hold similar concerns as the ones expressed in his essay.
[01:23.520 --> 01:28.000]  Concerns about the federal government, its overreach, and even the Illuminati. It is
[01:28.000 --> 01:32.000]  unclear whether Mr. Hallman will be meeting with the FBI again, but it is certain that
[01:32.000 --> 01:36.000]  he is ready to disclose to the news media more about his strange encounter.
[01:41.000 --> 01:45.880]  Three years ago, Austinite Devin Contreras was an average healthy 16-year-old adolescent,
[01:45.880 --> 01:50.240]  but a fateful night in the year 2010 forever changed his destiny. Exiting out the back
[01:50.240 --> 01:54.780]  door of a big-lot store in Austin, Texas in an incident police say was a burglary, Devin
[01:54.780 --> 01:59.500]  paid the ultimate penalty for his unawareness of the seriousness of his situation. In four
[01:59.500 --> 02:04.840]  seconds, Contreras was shot 14 times by Austin Police Department Officer James Bowen. The
[02:04.840 --> 02:09.280]  life of Devin Contreras ended that evening. Yesterday, Federal Judge Sam Sparks ruled
[02:09.280 --> 02:13.380]  that the shooting by Officer Bowen did not use excessive force, despite the fact that
[02:13.380 --> 02:17.840]  over a dozen rounds of ammunition were fired at the minor. However, Judge Sparks did reprimand
[02:17.840 --> 02:22.480]  the police's lack of openness about the topic, determining that the Austin Police Department
[02:22.480 --> 02:28.280]  showed a quote, pattern and practice of providing woefully late and incomplete discovery responses.
[02:33.280 --> 02:36.960]  With the rise of alternative birthing, also comes a rise in the practice of umbilical
[02:36.960 --> 02:42.680]  cord non-servants, or not cutting the umbilical cord of a newborn directly after birth. According
[02:42.680 --> 02:46.820]  to ABC News, Mary Callay of Austin, Texas, believes there are many benefits to leaving
[02:46.820 --> 02:51.100]  an umbilical cord intact after birth, including the final transfusion of blood cells rich
[02:51.100 --> 02:56.600]  in stem cells and immunoglobin that theoretically can help the infant fight off infections.
[02:56.600 --> 03:25.600]  Umbilical cords naturally take about 10 days to fall off after birth.
[03:25.600 --> 03:31.120]  We are back. Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Roo La Radio, with our special guest, Steve
[03:31.120 --> 03:36.160]  Skidmore, and we're talking to Mike in Texas. Okay, Mike, you had something else you wanted
[03:36.160 --> 03:37.160]  to address?
[03:37.160 --> 03:41.400]  Well, just to tie it up, I didn't mean to take up so much time.
[03:41.400 --> 03:47.960]  No, that's okay. I just want to make sure, just so I didn't have to hold you over for
[03:47.960 --> 03:48.960]  nothing.
[03:48.960 --> 03:55.560]  Well, let's see, in his latest order, he even admits that he's a sua sponte, dismissed
[03:55.560 --> 04:01.080]  my informa pauperis. So, without evidence, he just decides that's okay. And apparently,
[04:01.080 --> 04:11.760]  he decides his own dismissal. So, I disqualified him, and he decides to deny my motion to disqualify
[04:11.760 --> 04:22.400]  him. He considers himself such an authority, and so above approach, which is interesting.
[04:22.400 --> 04:29.680]  I'm looking up law on that, and it's really not, they're supposed to disqualify themselves
[04:29.680 --> 04:36.240]  if there's reasonable cause that's presented that a reasonable person...
[04:36.240 --> 04:44.280]  Okay, what are, okay, that's the same in Texas, but if they don't disqualify themselves, what
[04:44.280 --> 04:46.280]  are they required to do then?
[04:46.280 --> 04:54.200]  Well, it is not, that's what I'm trying to find out. It doesn't appear that there's,
[04:54.200 --> 05:00.560]  in Texas is not one of the states that allow, Texas, and I guess probably the Fifth Circuit,
[05:00.560 --> 05:07.040]  does not allow for pre-emptory disqualification.
[05:07.040 --> 05:17.040]  Okay, Texas does federal. This is, I'm asking because this is an area I haven't specifically
[05:17.040 --> 05:18.040]  researched.
[05:18.040 --> 05:26.400]  Yeah, I'm trying to find that out, but they're supposed to, you know, avoid any preponderance
[05:26.400 --> 05:37.280]  of impartiality, and, you know, when they do that, that casts a shadow on the court,
[05:37.280 --> 05:41.840]  and so I don't believe he's operating in very good faith, and so it's going to have
[05:41.840 --> 05:47.080]  to be something that I think I'm going to bring up to his supervisors at the Fifth Circuit,
[05:47.080 --> 05:54.640]  that he refuses to, that he's moved another justice off the process of the City of Austin.
[05:54.640 --> 06:01.280]  He's taken both these cases, and he's just acted sua sante, dismissed both of them as
[06:01.280 --> 06:05.760]  frivolous without merit, even though there's a lot of evidence to show the contrary. He
[06:05.760 --> 06:10.680]  just declares it so, and therefore it must be, and so I think that these are probably
[06:10.680 --> 06:16.400]  things that are going to have to be adjudicated with his bosses at the Fifth Circuit and at
[06:16.400 --> 06:23.160]  the Justice Department when I file a judicial complaint, but it does say that when it goes
[06:23.160 --> 06:30.960]  above the Fifth Circuit, they can overrule everything and have him removed from the case.
[06:30.960 --> 06:35.040]  Just because he wants to stay on there doesn't mean that if they stay otherwise, he's got
[06:35.040 --> 06:44.160]  to go. So that, you know, goes to me writing a good writ, and you find writing a good appellate
[06:44.160 --> 06:53.640]  brief, and I think that I've got a lot of, you know, he only partially cited the correct
[06:53.640 --> 06:59.880]  rules of procedure. Yes, he can dismiss if he decides there is, but he can't dismiss.
[06:59.880 --> 07:06.120]  It clearly says, if there is no evidence, he must have evidence. If he has, no.
[07:06.120 --> 07:14.360]  Okay, those are, I was looking for specifics, procedures in the case of a motion for disqualification.
[07:14.360 --> 07:20.800]  It would seem that a judge could disqualify himself or recuse himself in the face of a
[07:20.800 --> 07:31.280]  motion, but it's not equitable for him to be able to rule against his own disqualification.
[07:31.280 --> 07:39.760]  There has to be something on that. In Texas law, if a judge does not voluntarily recuse
[07:39.760 --> 07:45.760]  himself, then he must forward the motion to the head administrative judge of the district,
[07:45.760 --> 07:50.560]  and that judge appoints someone to hear the motion. There has to be some procedure in
[07:50.560 --> 07:56.520]  the Fed, because if you have a corrupt judge, a corrupt judge is not going to disqualify
[07:56.520 --> 08:05.640]  himself. There has to be a remedy. Well, I believe I used fairly good statute law. I
[08:05.640 --> 08:10.880]  mean, part of my 18 page was directed from the American Law Review, and it goes to the
[08:10.880 --> 08:17.240]  reasonable person standard, and I think I've provided quite a bit of evidence in there
[08:17.240 --> 08:22.560]  for just, you know, for a reasonable person to believe that there is justification for
[08:22.560 --> 08:28.760]  him to recuse himself. Okay. Have you looked at the code? What does
[08:28.760 --> 08:31.240]  the... The code say that...
[08:31.240 --> 08:45.080]  We'll just... Go ahead. This would be under 18455. So, under 18 U.S.C. 455 disqualification
[08:45.080 --> 08:50.680]  of judge or justice or magistrate. Any magistrate or judge of the United States shall disqualify
[08:50.680 --> 08:56.840]  himself. So, I guess it means he has to in any proceeding in which his impartiality is
[08:56.840 --> 09:02.600]  reasonably questioned. Well, I think I reasonably questioned it, and therefore, you know, shall
[09:02.600 --> 09:10.440]  means he must do it. Does it go on to say what the procedure is
[09:10.440 --> 09:16.200]  if the judge elects not to recuse him, voluntarily recuse himself?
[09:16.200 --> 09:26.040]  No, it doesn't. It just says that he shall do it. And then, I did cite in two and three
[09:26.040 --> 09:31.080]  of my disqualification of him tampering with a witness, because this is before he even
[09:31.080 --> 09:36.520]  threatened me. You know, I believe that he was tampering with it, and so I cited both
[09:36.520 --> 09:45.640]  18 U.S.C. 1512 tampering with U.S.C. federal, and then Texas penal code 36.05 tampering
[09:45.640 --> 09:51.080]  with a witness. And so, I cited those as some of my authorities, but it doesn't say what
[09:51.080 --> 09:54.680]  will happen if he refuses to relinquish the bench.
[09:54.680 --> 10:02.800]  Okay, then you might look at, this may be a good time for a judicial conduct complaint
[10:02.800 --> 10:07.520]  against him, because that goes in just like a lawsuit.
[10:07.520 --> 10:16.760]  Well, absolutely. As I see it, he's shielding the defendants from prosecution, and he knows
[10:16.760 --> 10:22.760]  it's a long list of people. And so, the next thing to do is going to be, you know, I might
[10:22.760 --> 10:28.680]  appeal this one, but I also might file a new lawsuit, and then I'll cite him in there in
[10:28.680 --> 10:35.900]  that lawsuit. And he's, you know, he'd have a hard time sitting, you know, as a magistrate
[10:35.900 --> 10:43.860]  on that court when he's listed as one of the defendants.
[10:43.860 --> 10:51.880]  That should get interesting, and keep us up to date on what's going on. I'm thinking that
[10:51.880 --> 11:02.840]  your case may wind up as a pivotal case, because what they've done here is so egregious, and
[11:02.840 --> 11:09.480]  you've been so careful to document all of their mistakes. And I can't help but think
[11:09.480 --> 11:18.920]  this is why Judge Sparks is so upset and why he screwed up so bad, because he acted ignorant,
[11:18.920 --> 11:26.480]  and you were a pro se, so you weren't too intimidated by his bad attitude. That he's
[11:26.480 --> 11:31.680]  used to lawyers ducking and running for cover.
[11:31.680 --> 11:35.440]  I skipped over some really important stuff when I was giving some highlights. I just
[11:35.440 --> 11:46.280]  recalled that. So, this is kudos to you, Randy. When I initially was, you know, when the third
[11:46.280 --> 11:53.120]  court of appeals kicked up my case, you know, and they entered, you know, obviously provable
[11:53.120 --> 11:58.720]  perjured statements into the record, you know, one of them just being, you know, I never
[11:58.720 --> 12:05.280]  objected, even though there's an inch of documents, you know, contrary to that fact, and running
[12:05.280 --> 12:10.800]  the routine of filing criminal complaints in, I did get an interesting ruling from the
[12:10.800 --> 12:17.340]  court of criminal appeals. And they gave an order to the third court to review it again,
[12:17.340 --> 12:24.680]  and they also said that they mandated to the third court to preserve my documents. So,
[12:24.680 --> 12:29.680]  I do have a letter from the third court of appeals. They wanted to destroy about 1,500
[12:29.680 --> 12:34.840]  pages of documents, because they wanted, you know, to hide the evidence, obviously, destroy
[12:34.840 --> 12:39.240]  the evidence. And the court of criminal appeals said, no, you shall maintain these records
[12:39.240 --> 12:47.840]  for at least 25 years. So, at least I was able, through that process, to preserve the
[12:47.840 --> 12:54.960]  record for future work. And I wouldn't have been able to do that without running the system.
[12:54.960 --> 13:05.160]  So, thank you very much for that. And I have the district with Rosemary Lemberg. They have
[13:05.160 --> 13:11.360]  a white-collar crime division looking into it. Oh, this is another interesting thing.
[13:11.360 --> 13:17.140]  In the Travis County thing, I found out that there's an insurance policy for the county.
[13:17.140 --> 13:24.040]  And so, I filed a claim. They accepted a claim. She's a licensed insurance investigator. And
[13:24.040 --> 13:29.480]  to the best of my knowledge, I've got to find out the exact fine points. But the Travis
[13:29.480 --> 13:36.280]  County attorney immediately found out about that and denied the access to their policy,
[13:36.280 --> 13:41.840]  their insurance policy. It doesn't exist to the sponsor without advertising anything.
[13:41.840 --> 13:47.760]  These are things that are going to have to come out. And then, but they told a licensed
[13:47.760 --> 13:54.920]  insurance investigator not to process my claim. Well, to the best of my knowledge, that's
[13:54.920 --> 14:04.280]  a felony offense. And I've got the attorney general of Texas looking into their denial
[14:04.280 --> 14:10.380]  of my open records act. So, it's not just misdemeanor charges. It would be felony charges
[14:10.380 --> 14:16.520]  for interference with a licensed public investigator, a licensed insurance investigator.
[14:16.520 --> 14:25.840]  Oh, and we have a guy. I have a friend who is a licensed insurance investigator and has
[14:25.840 --> 14:32.640]  been forever. I need to get him to talk to you and give you all of the ins and outs of
[14:32.640 --> 14:41.340]  how to pursue that. How did you find out that the prosecutor told him this?
[14:41.340 --> 14:50.800]  That the prosecutor, oh, because they told it to me. One, I didn't know how they got
[14:50.800 --> 14:56.640]  my email address, but apparently Travis County somehow did some research and refused to do
[14:56.640 --> 15:02.760]  a mailing. They did it through electronic service, which I put a letter in the court,
[15:02.760 --> 15:08.840]  do not contact me ever again, $10,000 for each use of this. But to do that, I'm sure
[15:08.840 --> 15:15.120]  they did that for not just convenience, but to avoid any possibility of sending things
[15:15.120 --> 15:18.160]  through the mail and then I could cite them.
[15:18.160 --> 15:19.160]  Mail fraud.
[15:19.160 --> 15:25.600]  Exactly. So, I think that, but it's okay. I've got a nice little email, Shane, and we
[15:25.600 --> 15:33.760]  can discuss that because we come before mediation in May and so I can ask them about their instructing
[15:33.760 --> 15:44.760]  a licensed insurance investigator to not perform their duties. But there's also some bonuses
[15:44.760 --> 15:53.660]  to that. By them stopping, they have a period of 180 days, I believe, to come to the station
[15:53.660 --> 15:58.440]  and after that they have to rule in my favor. They can't, they lose, they waive their ability
[15:58.440 --> 16:05.360]  to deny my claim. They have to, they have to side with me after 180 days. So, the clock
[16:05.360 --> 16:08.600]  is ticking in my favor of that one.
[16:08.600 --> 16:16.840]  Oh, wonderful. There's just something about when you start screwing things up, you know,
[16:16.840 --> 16:22.000]  you've got the biggest tar baby I've ever seen. When you start screwing things up, then
[16:22.000 --> 16:27.520]  you try to cover up for what you screwed up. It just keeps getting worse. The only time
[16:27.520 --> 16:34.880]  it works for you is when the other guy quits. The other guy doesn't quit. Before long, this
[16:34.880 --> 16:39.720]  house of cards is going to fall in on you, just like their prosecution review did.
[16:39.720 --> 16:44.800]  Well, what's going to happen when all the criminal complaints get in the fifth circuit?
[16:44.800 --> 16:48.600]  Okay, hang on. We're about to go to break. We do need to move along. We've got a full
[16:48.600 --> 16:54.280]  board of callers. Hang on to the other side, Mike. This is Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens,
[16:54.280 --> 17:23.880]  Betty Craig, here with Steve Skidmore. We'll be right back.
[17:23.880 --> 17:46.800]  Order Beyond Tangy Tangerine and other great longevity products at logosradionetwork.com
[17:46.800 --> 17:51.280]  by clicking on the Tangy Tangerine banner. Sign up as a preferred customer for wholesale
[17:51.280 --> 17:57.240]  prices or become a distributor and support logosradionetwork.com. So what do you say,
[17:57.240 --> 17:58.240]  Elvis?
[17:58.240 --> 18:01.000]  I don't know. I don't even know much.
[18:01.000 --> 18:06.320]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:06.320 --> 18:10.720]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meris Proven Method. Michael Meris has won
[18:10.720 --> 18:16.320]  six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win, too. You'll get step-by-step
[18:16.320 --> 18:21.480]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:21.480 --> 18:26.320]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and
[18:26.320 --> 18:30.800]  phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial
[18:30.800 --> 18:36.720]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Meris Proven Method is the
[18:36.720 --> 18:41.720]  solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.720 --> 18:47.360]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meris banner
[18:47.360 --> 18:56.760]  or e-mail MichaelMeris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or e-mail m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s
[18:56.760 --> 19:13.080]  at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:13.080 --> 19:27.760]  Well, don't let nothing get to you. Only the father can deliver you. So don't let bad-minded
[19:27.760 --> 19:38.760]  people hurt you. And just sit and get behind you. Know what I mean? My friend, knowledge
[19:38.760 --> 19:46.760]  you know he worth the aim. Trust in God, me friend. Tell him you're a problem then.
[19:46.760 --> 19:52.760]  Have an easy one, it's a game. Here we go, you know he worth the aim.
[19:52.760 --> 19:58.760]  He and me king, man, he is everything. He's everything to me, that's what me call him.
[19:58.760 --> 20:04.760]  On top of me knee, I may pray to him. Because he's the only one who could answer him.
[20:04.760 --> 20:09.760]  Been a business, what we can man say him. Mankind, you know, is this leading?
[20:09.760 --> 20:15.760]  We turn our trust in God, me friend. Tell him you're a problem then.
[20:15.760 --> 20:22.760]  Okay, we are back. I'm Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens. We're with our special guest, Steve
[20:22.760 --> 20:27.760]  Skidmore, and we're talking to Mike in Texas. Okay, Mike.
[20:27.760 --> 20:34.760]  Yes, sir. Just to finish it up, or what do you want me to do?
[20:34.760 --> 20:37.760]  Yeah, well you had one other thing you wanted to address?
[20:37.760 --> 20:44.760]  Oh, um, yeah I mean, I don't know. This whole thing just every day fills me for a loop.
[20:44.760 --> 20:49.760]  You know, I have video recorded evidence of both events, and it clearly shows in both
[20:49.760 --> 20:55.760]  of them that I didn't do anything wrong. And it just blows my mind, all at the beginning
[20:55.760 --> 20:59.760]  of either of them. I would have been happy if they just would have apologized to handshake
[20:59.760 --> 21:04.760]  or whatever, and just let me go. And they just continue to process, they stimulate legal
[21:04.760 --> 21:08.760]  process. You know, in the city of Austin, the first time I came to the Magister, he
[21:08.760 --> 21:13.760]  threatened and ran the documents down my throat. The second one, they tampered with government
[21:13.760 --> 21:18.760]  documents right in front of my witnesses. And then the judge asked me, and there's
[21:18.760 --> 21:23.760]  new charges against me, and he's saying, Liggers, the law is no excuse. And I said,
[21:23.760 --> 21:28.760]  well, your honor, if Liggers' law is no excuse, do you know what these new charges are? And
[21:28.760 --> 21:35.760]  she just goes, no, I don't know. You know, it just goes on and on and on.
[21:35.760 --> 21:41.760]  Then denying the access to the records, you know, when I know that they've not provided
[21:41.760 --> 21:48.760]  me the evidence, then they change charges, form new charges, I subpoena them, they avoid
[21:48.760 --> 21:54.760]  service, and I get it in their own handwriting, that they avoided service, they engineered
[21:54.760 --> 22:00.760]  them to avoid service by not having the subpoenas served to them. And then, you know, when I
[22:00.760 --> 22:04.760]  filed that into court, the very next day, they sent people to a coffee shop I worked
[22:04.760 --> 22:10.760]  at that threatened and harassed me. The first time, I didn't do anything, but the second
[22:10.760 --> 22:15.760]  time was very, very obvious, and I put affidavit in. Now, I'm not sure what do they really
[22:15.760 --> 22:19.760]  expect me to do, you know, if I put an affidavit in.
[22:19.760 --> 22:27.760]  They expect you to just back down and go away and go hide somewhere. There was a John Wayne
[22:27.760 --> 22:37.760]  movie called The Searchers, where the Indians took John Wayne's nephew, I'm sorry, niece,
[22:37.760 --> 22:45.760]  and him and his nephew went chasing him and chased him for four years. And the nephew
[22:45.760 --> 22:55.760]  said to John Wayne, why don't we just stop after all of this time? And he said that the
[22:55.760 --> 23:03.760]  Indian don't understand a critter that'll just keep on coming. And that's their problem.
[23:03.760 --> 23:10.760]  They expect you to back up and fade away, or they did expect you to. So they did stupid
[23:10.760 --> 23:14.760]  stuff, and you called them on it. And once they were called on it, they did something
[23:14.760 --> 23:20.760]  even more stupid to try to make the stupid thing go away. And our baby, it just kept
[23:20.760 --> 23:22.760]  getting bigger and bigger and bigger.
[23:22.760 --> 23:24.760]  It's like telling a lie.
[23:24.760 --> 23:33.760]  You could bring the whole house of cards down on them. Go ahead, Mike.
[23:33.760 --> 23:40.760]  The thing is, they put me in a situation where I had my back against all I've got to, because
[23:40.760 --> 23:44.760]  there's derogatory comments that affected my ability to work. I haven't been able to
[23:44.760 --> 23:50.760]  get a job as an engineer since then, because people, you know, this is a quote I'm accused
[23:50.760 --> 23:53.760]  all the time of being a criminal. I'm like, there's a bottle of water in the luggage.
[23:53.760 --> 24:00.760]  Well, you're a criminal, you know? And I was even told by my systems of counsel that they're
[24:00.760 --> 24:08.760]  leaving these notations on my record in BPS, saying there's an open criminal investigation
[24:08.760 --> 24:13.760]  just because they're trying to put financial pressure on these, so then I can't get employment
[24:13.760 --> 24:20.760]  and I'll have to cave in. I mean...
[24:20.760 --> 24:27.760]  They expect that they'll wear you down. And it sounds like they're realizing that you're
[24:27.760 --> 24:36.760]  not wearing down, and this is what happens when somebody doesn't wear down. After a while,
[24:36.760 --> 24:40.760]  this worm turns and all this stuff starts coming back after them.
[24:40.760 --> 24:45.760]  Well, I'm only a couple steps away from the Supreme Court.
[24:45.760 --> 24:51.760]  And there's someone I want to bring up next, and Mike, you need to listen to Francis.
[24:51.760 --> 24:52.760]  Okay.
[24:52.760 --> 24:55.760]  You two are a lot alike.
[24:55.760 --> 24:56.760]  Okay.
[24:56.760 --> 25:01.760]  Thank you, Mike, and keep us up to date on the developments.
[25:01.760 --> 25:07.760]  Okay, yeah, I think there's going to be some significant developments coming up in the
[25:07.760 --> 25:15.760]  next month. They've ruled that the judge has ordered mediation, he demands mediation,
[25:15.760 --> 25:20.760]  yet he considers the case frivolous. You know, figure that out.
[25:20.760 --> 25:29.760]  Okay, he considers it frivolous and he's dismissed it out of hand, but he still ordered mediation.
[25:29.760 --> 25:30.760]  Yeah.
[25:30.760 --> 25:33.760]  How do you mediate a dismissed case?
[25:33.760 --> 25:37.760]  I don't know. He came back and I dismissed it.
[25:37.760 --> 25:43.760]  Well, you better figure it out, because if you don't mediate in good faith, Bubba, they'll
[25:43.760 --> 25:45.760]  figure out something to do.
[25:45.760 --> 25:53.760]  I tried. The other side, Travis County, refuses to mediate.
[25:53.760 --> 25:58.760]  That's what they're like. Well, that'll give them that to say, I suppose. Okay, let me
[25:58.760 --> 26:02.760]  move on to Francis. I definitely want to hear her story.
[26:02.760 --> 26:03.760]  Okay.
[26:03.760 --> 26:05.760]  Thank you very much, Mike.
[26:05.760 --> 26:06.760]  Thank you, Randy.
[26:06.760 --> 26:16.760]  Okay. Okay, we are going to Francis in Colorado. Hello, Ms. Francis. Where have you been?
[26:16.760 --> 26:23.760]  Well, I've been fighting. I've been kind of, you know, just trying to keep the dirty side
[26:23.760 --> 26:29.760]  down as it were on the road, but I got served yesterday. This is a totally different thing
[26:29.760 --> 26:35.760]  from the real estate deal. I got served yesterday, and I'm the defendant in a lawsuit in North
[26:35.760 --> 26:43.760]  Carolina, and it has to do with my family again, and I don't know what my next move
[26:43.760 --> 26:48.760]  is. I need a little bit of time, because it does wind back into some of the real estate
[26:48.760 --> 26:53.760]  stuff, and I need a little bit of time. I need to not move forward until, but I'm thinking
[26:53.760 --> 26:57.760]  I need to file a countersuit.
[26:57.760 --> 27:01.760]  What's the nature of the action?
[27:01.760 --> 27:11.760]  It's a trust and passing of a relative, and I am an heir with my sister and my uncle and
[27:11.760 --> 27:17.760]  my brother, and my mother was trustee, but not an heir, and six months before the aunt
[27:17.760 --> 27:24.760]  died, my mother and brother wiped all of her investments out and invested three and a half
[27:24.760 --> 27:29.760]  million dollars into my brother's company in a debenture, which is unsecured, high-risk,
[27:29.760 --> 27:35.760]  brand-new company, basically, and told the uncle in July, six months before my aunt died,
[27:35.760 --> 27:40.760]  that the purpose was to keep my sister and I from getting any money. And so, but the
[27:40.760 --> 27:46.760]  thing is, they took all of his money too, so he's hired a litigation firm. So we've
[27:46.760 --> 27:50.760]  got non-accounting. The trustee has never noticed, my sister and I, that we're even
[27:50.760 --> 27:58.760]  heirs. You've got conversion, just about everything, self-dealing, you've got a loan
[27:58.760 --> 28:03.760]  given at three and a half percent interest only for five years, and then pay in principle
[28:03.760 --> 28:08.760]  for ten years after that with no interest. And you can't get your money back, you can't
[28:08.760 --> 28:13.760]  convert it, you waive your jury trial, and it's unbelievable. I don't think you can
[28:13.760 --> 28:17.760]  stand in court, I just don't think it's defensible at all.
[28:17.760 --> 28:21.760]  How were you a defendant?
[28:21.760 --> 28:27.760]  Because my uncle sued as the plaintiff and named everybody else's defendants.
[28:27.760 --> 28:36.760]  Beautiful, perfect. You need to file and cross-complain.
[28:36.760 --> 28:39.760]  A cross-complaint, okay.
[28:39.760 --> 28:47.760]  Yes, you're not a countersuit. You don't sue your uncle. You file your, and your uncle
[28:47.760 --> 28:49.760]  had to sue everybody.
[28:49.760 --> 28:50.760]  Right.
[28:50.760 --> 28:55.760]  So he had to do that. He's probably not an enemy to you at all.
[28:55.760 --> 28:56.760]  No.
[28:56.760 --> 29:02.760]  So you come back with an answer denying all the allegations and cross-complaint against
[29:02.760 --> 29:07.760]  your brother and sister or whoever.
[29:07.760 --> 29:13.760]  You would be helping your brother sue, helping the uncle sue the sister, I think.
[29:13.760 --> 29:14.760]  It's not the sister.
[29:14.760 --> 29:15.760]  Exactly.
[29:15.760 --> 29:18.760]  The sister and I would file the cross-claim against my mother, my brother, and my brother's
[29:18.760 --> 29:19.760]  company.
[29:19.760 --> 29:20.760]  Yes.
[29:20.760 --> 29:22.760]  So we would be on the same side.
[29:22.760 --> 29:23.760]  Yes.
[29:23.760 --> 29:27.760]  Okay, well that makes a lot of sense. I couldn't figure out how a counterclaim was going to
[29:27.760 --> 29:35.760]  work, and we never have been adversarial. I've talked to his litigation firm. So thank
[29:35.760 --> 29:36.760]  you for the...
[29:36.760 --> 29:37.760]  Absolutely.
[29:37.760 --> 29:40.760]  The first thing you're going to have to do is answer that complaint.
[29:40.760 --> 29:47.760]  Absolutely. Okay, hang on. We're about to go to break. This is Randy Kelton and Debra
[29:47.760 --> 29:55.760]  Stevens, Wheel of Law Radio. We're here with Steve Skidmore. We're calling number 512-646-1984.
[29:55.760 --> 30:01.760]  We'll be right back.
[30:01.760 --> 30:06.300]  Would you like to be more attractive? A quick clothing change could do the trick. Researchers
[30:06.300 --> 30:10.160]  say it could be as simple as choosing the right color. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht,
[30:10.160 --> 30:12.880]  and I'll be back in just a moment to tell you more.
[30:12.880 --> 30:17.880]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches, and creating a massive
[30:17.880 --> 30:23.200]  database of your personal information. That's creepy, but it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:23.200 --> 30:27.800]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. Startpage doesn't store your
[30:27.800 --> 30:32.200]  IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party
[30:32.200 --> 30:37.560]  certified. If you don't like big brothers spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[30:37.560 --> 30:43.780]  Great search results and total privacy. Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. Lady
[30:43.780 --> 30:50.120]  in red. You might remember that 1980s hit song. Chris DeBerg crooned about how his lady
[30:50.120 --> 30:55.280]  never looked so lovely, but he was puzzled. What changed that made her so irresistible?
[30:55.280 --> 31:00.700]  It was her new red dress. Researchers prove that red makes women more desirable to men.
[31:00.700 --> 31:05.540]  In one study, men viewed a picture of a moderately attractive lady dressed in red. A second group
[31:05.540 --> 31:11.200]  of men viewed that same lady dressed in blue. The results? Red revved things up. Men wanted
[31:11.200 --> 31:15.900]  to flirt with and sit much closer to the lady in red. So ladies, if you want to attract
[31:15.900 --> 31:21.400]  a man or light the fire in your special guy, wear red. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More
[31:21.400 --> 31:31.640]  news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:31.640 --> 31:37.020]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[31:37.020 --> 31:42.440]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[31:42.440 --> 31:46.360]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their
[31:46.360 --> 31:50.960]  lives. Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:50.960 --> 31:54.080]  I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force
[31:54.080 --> 31:59.080]  pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to
[31:59.080 --> 32:02.240]  RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:02.240 --> 32:07.200]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so
[32:07.200 --> 32:12.040]  easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with. Oh, well, I guess you haven't
[32:12.040 --> 32:17.320]  heard of Brave New Books then. Brave New Books? Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and
[32:17.320 --> 32:22.220]  DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin. They
[32:22.220 --> 32:27.520]  even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin soaps. There's no way a place like
[32:27.520 --> 32:32.840]  that exists. Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just
[32:32.840 --> 32:38.840]  south of UT. By UT, there's never anywhere to park down there. Actually, they now offer
[32:38.840 --> 32:44.240]  a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK Parking Facility, just behind
[32:44.240 --> 32:50.880]  the bookstore. It does exist, but when are they open? Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m.
[32:50.880 --> 32:57.880]  to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays. So give them a call at 512-480-2503, or check
[32:57.880 --> 33:22.720]  out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[33:27.880 --> 33:51.880]  Mm-hmm, yeah, I won't. Oh, I won't. I won't let you pull the wool over my eyes. I simply
[33:51.880 --> 34:03.560]  refuse your news, also come in line. It seems you like to fail, but please take some words
[34:03.560 --> 34:04.560]  to the line.
[34:04.560 --> 34:11.480]  Okay, we are back. Randy Calvin Davis-Stevens, Roovelaw Radio with our special guest Steve
[34:11.480 --> 34:20.240]  Skidmore, and we're talking to Francis in Colorado. Okay, Francis, if you will send
[34:20.240 --> 34:28.480]  me that document, I will give you my best estimation of if you think you need my input.
[34:28.480 --> 34:34.520]  Okay, so, but answer the complaint first and then file a cross complaint? That was my next
[34:34.520 --> 34:35.520]  question.
[34:35.520 --> 34:40.720]  Yes, yes, and make sure you answer the complaint, and generally, you just generally deny, you
[34:40.720 --> 34:47.560]  deny everything that would result in a claim against you, and yes, you do them both at
[34:47.560 --> 34:51.460]  one time, answer and cross complaint.
[34:51.460 --> 34:55.600]  You can title your document, you know, you put your, put the document style at the top
[34:55.600 --> 35:02.040]  and then title your document, general denial, and then go in, you know, I generally deny
[35:02.040 --> 35:09.800]  all allegations alleged against me, and then you go in and file your cross complaint. Now,
[35:09.800 --> 35:17.360]  you can speak to the uncle, I think it is, did I get the lineage right? Is it the uncle
[35:17.360 --> 35:18.920]  that's filed the suit?
[35:18.920 --> 35:26.320]  Yes, he didn't actually do this having done anything wrong. We're just named as an attendant.
[35:26.320 --> 35:30.200]  Okay, right, right. Well, you can go to the uncle and say, hey, I want to join you in
[35:30.200 --> 35:31.200]  your suit.
[35:31.200 --> 35:38.700]  Well, you've already tried that. He's, that's what we thought was going to happen at first,
[35:38.700 --> 35:44.740]  and then he went with the litigator, and he's very, very sick. He is advanced age, and he
[35:44.740 --> 35:49.200]  just wanted to move forward, and I don't know, he and my sister have had a little bit of
[35:49.200 --> 35:53.680]  bad blood between each other, so I think we're just going to have to end up being, you know,
[35:53.680 --> 35:54.680]  kind of...
[35:54.680 --> 35:58.800]  Well, you don't have any beef with the uncle, do you?
[35:58.800 --> 35:59.800]  No.
[35:59.800 --> 36:05.640]  Yeah, you won't have to worry about it anyway. This way, you don't have to pay your filing
[36:05.640 --> 36:08.640]  fees, and you need to go after your brother.
[36:08.640 --> 36:14.840]  Okay, well, and actually, my mother's the trustee, so it's really, you know, breach
[36:14.840 --> 36:17.400]  and all that other kind of death, but I just was real confused.
[36:17.400 --> 36:21.080]  She was the one, the mother was the one pulling all the strings?
[36:21.080 --> 36:25.820]  No, I don't think so. I think that my brother was filing, pulling all the strings, but my
[36:25.820 --> 36:28.640]  mother was the trustee of the trust, and so it...
[36:28.640 --> 36:30.600]  Well, it's going to come back to her.
[36:30.600 --> 36:39.280]  Yeah, so you have to sue the mother. Okay, I want to hear about your foreclosure issue.
[36:39.280 --> 36:41.600]  Who are you on that?
[36:41.600 --> 36:47.200]  Okay, well, let's see. Do you want me to go back? We got foreclosed on in 2010, never
[36:47.200 --> 36:55.040]  admitted default, never proved default, so let's see. The hearing is for in 2010. They
[36:55.040 --> 37:00.740]  sold the house in 2011. They transferred it to Fannie Mae. We filed a resp and telesuit
[37:00.740 --> 37:07.540]  in the federal case that was eventually dismissed in July of 2012. We filed a wrongful foreclosure
[37:07.540 --> 37:15.360]  case in September of 2012, and they filed... In the meantime, we had to file a bankruptcy
[37:15.360 --> 37:24.040]  which was completely unrelated, and they got a relief from stay, and so they filed for
[37:24.040 --> 37:31.000]  an eviction, and they actually got an eviction judgment against us on the 12th of December.
[37:31.000 --> 37:40.600]  We filed an appeal, and then we filed a 13, Chapter 13, because our Chapter 7 had been
[37:40.600 --> 37:48.520]  dismissed just to get a 30 days today, and on the 31st of December... Well, at the beginning
[37:48.520 --> 37:54.940]  of December, we sent out our letters of intent to sue in order to set up for a quiet title.
[37:54.940 --> 37:59.520]  You have to earn the right due to quiet title, so we sent out our letters of intent to sue
[37:59.520 --> 38:08.080]  per in Colorado. It's Rules of Civil Procedure 105, and they want you to try to mediate to
[38:08.080 --> 38:15.160]  get the quitclaim, and we sent out a $20 money order in MERS, and we mentioned the money
[38:15.160 --> 38:21.760]  order in the intent to sue, and then the quitclaim on the money order in MERS, cash the check.
[38:21.760 --> 38:28.720]  They didn't execute the quitclaim, but we can have a judge, I think, compel. So we filed
[38:28.720 --> 38:38.380]  our quitclaim, and we filed our quiet title on the 13th of February, and meanwhile, we
[38:38.380 --> 38:45.120]  evidently lacked standing on the wrongful foreclosure suit because our bankruptcy attorney
[38:45.120 --> 38:51.320]  failed to list our claim against the House on Schedule B. So we've had to reopen our
[38:51.320 --> 38:58.200]  Chapter 7 in order to allow the bankruptcy trustee to take it or leave it, but they've
[38:58.200 --> 39:02.540]  been just dismissing everyone, no evidence, no nothing, just dismissing everyone because
[39:02.540 --> 39:09.360]  we lack standing. But when we filed the quiet title, we filed an automatic stay into every
[39:09.360 --> 39:16.440]  other case based on Rule 301 here in Colorado, which is the Rule of Presumption. So all of
[39:16.440 --> 39:23.600]  a sudden, we're questioning the presumption of title, and every case is on hold. Every
[39:23.600 --> 39:31.900]  case has stayed. And so we are still proceeding. People are still filing documents into the
[39:31.900 --> 39:37.420]  wrong foreclosure, and we're answering, but it stayed. Nothing will be decided. So now
[39:37.420 --> 39:42.880]  we're on the quiet title. We filed the quiet title on the 13th of February, and then on
[39:42.880 --> 39:48.800]  the 8th of March, out of nowhere, the lender had three attorneys in the district court,
[39:48.800 --> 39:54.040]  and they hired two new ones for the federal court to remove it to federal court. And it's
[39:54.040 --> 40:00.600]  a states' rights issue, so I filed a motion to remand. I amended my pleading and took
[40:00.600 --> 40:05.800]  out a federal rule, and they didn't oppose it, and they remanded it back to the state
[40:05.800 --> 40:13.900]  court in 13 days. And so now we're just waiting for the John and Jane Does, who had to be
[40:13.900 --> 40:19.320]  noticed through public notice, and they have until the 25th of April to file any kind of
[40:19.320 --> 40:27.420]  a claim into the case. So currently I'm working on, I know these attorneys are from someplace
[40:27.420 --> 40:34.520]  else. I challenged their agency, and they gave me a lineage of the company, but they
[40:34.520 --> 40:40.600]  didn't give me their agency. So I'm kind of racking my head and thinking maybe what I
[40:40.600 --> 40:44.440]  need to do is to find out who hired them and maybe just compel the court to force them
[40:44.440 --> 40:48.720]  to show who they're really working for. But I don't know how to word that up, Randy. And
[40:48.720 --> 40:54.280]  then I also have to, the lender has responded. They're the only ones really named in the
[40:54.280 --> 40:59.820]  quiet title, and they've responded with a motion to dismiss, of course. But in the wrongful
[40:59.820 --> 41:05.280]  foreclosure case, they responded that they transferred all of their interests shortly
[41:05.280 --> 41:13.120]  after the loan was closed in 2006. They did not notice of a default. They did not know
[41:13.120 --> 41:18.680]  about a foreclosure, and they had no claims against the property. So I believe that represents
[41:18.680 --> 41:24.440]  judicial estoppel in the quiet title. What say ye?
[41:24.440 --> 41:35.920]  Yeah, that goes directly to collateral estoppel. They cannot take a position in one case and
[41:35.920 --> 41:42.680]  take a diametrically opposed position in another. Once they have made the admission that they
[41:42.680 --> 41:49.160]  have no claim, they're collaterally estopped from making another admission, even if they
[41:49.160 --> 42:02.920]  were incorrect on that first admission. As to agency, did you send these guys admissions?
[42:02.920 --> 42:11.120]  Send them what? The request for admissions and ask them to admit that they didn't have
[42:11.120 --> 42:17.040]  agency. Okay, I'll probably have to work with you
[42:17.040 --> 42:26.740]  on that one. Admissions and denials are a part of discovery.
[42:26.740 --> 42:31.240]  You're allowed admissions. In Texas, now I don't know about Colorado, but in Texas you're
[42:31.240 --> 42:36.920]  unlimited to admissions. You can ask a million admit or deny this, admit or deny that. But
[42:36.920 --> 42:43.080]  interrogatories, full length questions, interrogatories, you're limited. And I'm sure it's the same
[42:43.080 --> 42:49.440]  way in Colorado. But in Texas, I also wanted to, well, I've got the floor here. I'd also
[42:49.440 --> 42:55.320]  like to point out to you, Francis, that look in your Colorado statutes, because in Texas,
[42:55.320 --> 43:03.560]  there's a very, very important key twist in any action that would quiet the title, such
[43:03.560 --> 43:11.240]  as a quiet title action or a suit for trespass to try title. That is that in these types
[43:11.240 --> 43:17.400]  of cases, the burden of proof is on the defendant to take advantage of that, if that's the same
[43:17.400 --> 43:24.960]  way in Colorado. Okay, I'll find that out. You know what, I
[43:24.960 --> 43:30.840]  believe it is very similar here that they have to prove up why they, and the records
[43:30.840 --> 43:38.600]  don't support it. And they've already said they don't have a claim. So I, you know, that
[43:38.600 --> 43:45.480]  makes sense. It fits how it should be. It's because someone else made a claim against
[43:45.480 --> 43:52.440]  your title. You challenge that claim. You don't have to disprove the claim. They're
[43:52.440 --> 43:56.800]  the ones that made the claim. They're the ones that have to prove it out.
[43:56.800 --> 44:01.560]  That would make sense. That would make sense.
[44:01.560 --> 44:06.360]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the internet isn't
[44:06.360 --> 44:10.240]  so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[44:10.240 --> 44:13.120]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[44:13.120 --> 44:16.640]  Brave New Books? Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and
[44:16.640 --> 44:21.520]  DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin. They
[44:21.520 --> 44:25.600]  even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin soaps.
[44:25.600 --> 44:29.920]  There's no way a place like that exists. Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown
[44:29.920 --> 44:33.120]  at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[44:33.120 --> 44:37.000]  Oh, by UT, there's never anywhere to park down there.
[44:37.000 --> 44:42.280]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking
[44:42.280 --> 44:48.280]  facility, just behind the bookstore. It does exist, but when are they open?
[44:48.280 --> 44:53.680]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM, and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays. So give them a call
[44:53.680 --> 44:59.680]  at 512-480-2503, or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[44:59.680 --> 45:08.680]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[45:08.680 --> 45:15.360]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by
[45:15.360 --> 45:21.040]  step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have
[45:21.040 --> 45:27.280]  a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course,
[45:27.280 --> 45:31.400]  and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed
[45:31.400 --> 45:38.120]  attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn
[45:38.120 --> 45:42.960]  what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our
[45:42.960 --> 45:47.160]  American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video
[45:47.160 --> 45:54.120]  seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit
[45:54.120 --> 46:22.520]  the ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or call toll free, 866-LAW-EASY.
[46:24.120 --> 46:52.240]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Ben Stevens, here with our special guest, Steve Skidmore,
[46:52.240 --> 46:59.200]  and we're talking to Francis in Colorado. Okay, where were we, Francis? Let us run over
[46:59.200 --> 47:03.100]  the beep again. I can probably call in and ask when we get
[47:03.100 --> 47:06.800]  up there to the end of the month and see if there's anyone that we need to file a motion
[47:06.800 --> 47:13.280]  to strike or whatever. But I was going to ask on sanctions, I'm getting ready to file
[47:13.280 --> 47:17.840]  sanctions against the lender's attorneys. There's three of them, so I call them the
[47:17.840 --> 47:26.960]  three stooges. They filed a case, they filed a motion to dismiss a Rule 54B motion to dismiss
[47:26.960 --> 47:31.840]  over a month after they were dismissed from the wrongful foreclosure case in the wrongful
[47:31.840 --> 47:40.620]  foreclosure case. I think that's harassing. So I was filing a motion for sanction. Is
[47:40.620 --> 47:44.600]  that appropriate? That is absolutely appropriate.
[47:44.600 --> 47:48.920]  Yes. And I know even without asking, you did file
[47:48.920 --> 47:53.720]  bar grievances against them. I filed one set of bar grievances with them
[47:53.720 --> 47:57.560]  and I was going to file another, but I've just been having to manage all these cases
[47:57.560 --> 48:02.640]  because I'm having to manage an eviction, an appeal of an eviction, a quiet title, a
[48:02.640 --> 48:07.080]  probate in Florida with my dad, and now this thing with my aunt and the bankruptcy. So
[48:07.080 --> 48:17.080]  I, I am a little bit behind, but on the, well, I filed three bar grievances or four bar grievances
[48:17.080 --> 48:24.680]  in North Carolina. I did get that. I'm not completely out of the game. The criminal complaint
[48:24.680 --> 48:32.040]  on the foreclosure with 52 people involved in it. So I have been, I've been moving forward
[48:32.040 --> 48:38.080]  just hadn't done my bar grievances on these cats and I've been helping Dennis.
[48:38.080 --> 48:42.720]  So this gets real big. It gets hard to keep up sometimes.
[48:42.720 --> 48:47.160]  It does. I have notebooks everywhere and I figured out notebooks with sleeves are the
[48:47.160 --> 48:54.080]  best way to keep myself organized. You know, absolutely. You know, if you've got, if you've
[48:54.080 --> 49:00.760]  got all your documents in a notebook with a three ring binder with sleeves, put yourself
[49:00.760 --> 49:07.600]  together a table of context and a table of contents, I'm sorry, and then put tabs on
[49:07.600 --> 49:12.880]  every one of your sleeves corresponding with a, with a number out. If you've got like a
[49:12.880 --> 49:20.280]  deed of trust document, number one, deed of trust tab one, go on down the list through
[49:20.280 --> 49:25.600]  everything that way you can, if you, if you're in court, you can take your notebook in with
[49:25.600 --> 49:31.320]  you and you've got everything right there in your table of contents, table of contents
[49:31.320 --> 49:36.760]  and you're cross referenced with a tab, you can turn directly to it. You don't have to
[49:36.760 --> 49:43.440]  search. It's all right there. It works perfectly. And I use gusseted deals
[49:43.440 --> 49:48.480]  and if they file a motion or I file a motion, then the answer goes in the same one. So I
[49:48.480 --> 49:52.920]  know that that was that. And then the one face is one way and one face is the other.
[49:52.920 --> 49:57.560]  So I have notebooks for everything, including the case of the, you know, the foreclosure
[49:57.560 --> 50:02.600]  from before and all of that other stuff. So, and, uh, and I just discovered, Randy, I think
[50:02.600 --> 50:09.260]  I just was so afraid of going back and thinking that, um, because I wasn't talking to you
[50:09.260 --> 50:14.240]  when we actually went through the foreclosure, but I never admitted default. I read it in
[50:14.240 --> 50:20.120]  my transcript. We never admitted we were in default and the county attorney, I just had
[50:20.120 --> 50:26.760]  to file my motion, my answer to him. And he was, he filed a motion to dismiss res judicata
[50:26.760 --> 50:30.560]  that we had admitted that we were in default and that it was admitted. And therefore it
[50:30.560 --> 50:35.840]  was, there was, you know, residue to cut. It was already decided and it's crazy. And
[50:35.840 --> 50:39.680]  I went and I finally went and looked and I said, you're going to, I'm going to force
[50:39.680 --> 50:46.200]  you to look. And I did. And I never said it. The judge is the admission is the admission
[50:46.200 --> 50:52.040]  required in Colorado. It's the only question they ask is if you're in the military and
[50:52.040 --> 50:57.160]  if you're in default and if you answer the default or you're behind, but that's not even
[50:57.160 --> 51:03.960]  the right question. The question is, is the account in default? I never answered it. The
[51:03.960 --> 51:11.720]  only time I ever used the word default was I said, if we're in default, then you're telling
[51:11.720 --> 51:16.720]  me you're going to take my house. That's the only time I ever used the word, but every
[51:16.720 --> 51:21.340]  other word out of his mouth was default, default, default after default, only have to ask if
[51:21.340 --> 51:25.160]  you're in default. And that's how they trap people. And then they take their houses and
[51:25.160 --> 51:32.480]  they say, you've admitted it. Did you ever object to his use to the word default? I did
[51:32.480 --> 51:40.120]  not. It was the time I'd been in. Isn't that an assumption of law? What, that we're in
[51:40.120 --> 51:47.520]  default? Yes, he is assuming you're in default without proof. You're not in default. I would
[51:47.520 --> 51:53.360]  have objected to his use of default. Prove it. You claim it, you prove it. Well, the
[51:53.360 --> 51:57.200]  bank wasn't even there and he was advocating for the bank and they reset the hearing and
[51:57.200 --> 52:01.440]  then didn't even have, they didn't have a transcript and there was no hearing and they
[52:01.440 --> 52:06.200]  just kind of jammed it down. And I think it's like the last guy, they just couldn't go away
[52:06.200 --> 52:12.400]  and I'm just like a bad penny. I just keep showing up. Good for you. I just keep going
[52:12.400 --> 52:19.440]  back. I just, we had a caller on before you, Mike, the water bottle guy. And I told him
[52:19.440 --> 52:27.640]  he should listen to you because you two are alike in that respect. On the news, on the
[52:27.640 --> 52:31.400]  news in between on one of the segments and you guys were talking with Mike on, on this
[52:31.400 --> 52:37.300]  judge Spears, is that the same judge Spears that loaded up some, that when the cops loaded
[52:37.300 --> 52:42.400]  up some teenager with 14 bullets in a matter of seconds that he just ruled that they didn't
[52:42.400 --> 52:50.680]  use excessive force. Is that the same judge Sparks? That's Judge Sparks. Yes, it is. It
[52:50.680 --> 52:56.560]  is the same judge. Oh, what a delightful person he must be. He should meet my mother. He's
[52:56.560 --> 53:10.540]  a widow now. Maybe he can marry her. I ain't touching that one. Well, maybe if Mike keeps
[53:10.540 --> 53:18.240]  it up, he may, we may wind up rid of Sparks. Sparks donated half a million dollars to the
[53:18.240 --> 53:28.640]  Bush campaign and they created this spot just for him. So his, you know, and that I've often
[53:28.640 --> 53:37.000]  wondered how does he expect to make his half a million dollars back? Not on a judge's salary.
[53:37.000 --> 53:42.360]  No, but if you're taking stuff from the banks and deciding against every homeowner that
[53:42.360 --> 53:48.160]  comes into your court, now you're talking some jingle. Yeah, that's what I was thinking.
[53:48.160 --> 53:55.760]  So maybe, maybe he won't last too long. Well, let's hope not. I heard that as far as trying
[53:55.760 --> 54:00.360]  to get these judges recused, because I've been trying to work on that too, that they
[54:00.360 --> 54:06.400]  have to file into the courts all of their finances and all that kind of jazz. And if
[54:06.400 --> 54:10.640]  you can find a nexus somewhere, I found that one of the judges involved with one of our
[54:10.640 --> 54:15.280]  cases has MERS and sometimes it's just an inference, but of course you still run up
[54:15.280 --> 54:21.800]  against that they get to make their own decision. Well, let me, if you don't mind, let me parallel
[54:21.800 --> 54:28.360]  that with this. There's a guy here in Austin who has discovered that not one judge, let
[54:28.360 --> 54:35.720]  me repeat that, not one judge, not only in the state of Texas, but in every state with
[54:35.720 --> 54:44.600]  the single exception of New York, not one judge has a real oath of office. Now this
[54:44.600 --> 54:52.160]  goes to an age old principle. They're called maxims. The maxim is if you recuse all, you
[54:52.160 --> 55:00.320]  recuse none. Now my research indicates that every government employee, I don't care if
[55:00.320 --> 55:05.080]  he's, if he's picking up trash for the city, digging ditches, I don't care if he's a judge
[55:05.080 --> 55:13.120]  on the federal bench, every government employee, their pension is very, very, very deeply invested
[55:13.120 --> 55:18.120]  in mortgage backed securities. Many of these judges who have a lot of extra money have
[55:18.120 --> 55:25.280]  taken money out of their own coffers and invested even deeper in some of these remics in these
[55:25.280 --> 55:35.720]  mortgage backed securities. So they all have a reason to protect their investments in their
[55:35.720 --> 55:44.480]  pension funds. But we go back to the same principle. If you recuse all, you recuse none.
[55:44.480 --> 55:53.560]  Or if you dismiss all, you dismiss none. But on this issue, this is not one where you actually
[55:53.560 --> 56:01.680]  have to recuse all. You just recuse one. Just recuse that one, yeah. Yeah. So we can take
[56:01.680 --> 56:06.680]  them on individually. Yeah, but the next one in line is going to be just as guilty as the
[56:06.680 --> 56:12.080]  one you just threw in the trash. You've got to, well, you likely, you know, you might
[56:12.080 --> 56:19.640]  get a judge that you might get a better shot with. This is true. I've had two decent ones
[56:19.640 --> 56:24.240]  and two bad ones in the district court. And I think I had a pretty decent one in the federal
[56:24.240 --> 56:29.560]  court too. I didn't have a very good magistrate, but the judge was very, he considered things.
[56:29.560 --> 56:35.160]  But right now, the one that he grabbed the quiet title and he was already on the wrongful
[56:35.160 --> 56:39.720]  foreclosure. And they're just expecting, I think, to dismiss it because I lack standing
[56:39.720 --> 56:47.880]  because the trustee is the real party in interest until that bankruptcy is reclosed. That's
[56:47.880 --> 56:56.080]  just one of the things. So what are you looking at? You're pretty close to getting yours pretty
[56:56.080 --> 57:01.480]  well sewed up, aren't you? Well, the bankruptcy attorney, I mean the bankruptcy
[57:01.480 --> 57:05.920]  trustee decided to reopen the whole thing and decided that somehow or another I had
[57:05.920 --> 57:10.680]  more than two nickels to rub together. And he reopened everything last Wednesday when
[57:10.680 --> 57:14.900]  it was supposed to close day after tomorrow and the judge had put it together so it would
[57:14.900 --> 57:20.640]  only be open for 30 days. And so he's going to take a look. I sent him a bunch of documents,
[57:20.640 --> 57:26.920]  but if he goes ahead and lets go of it, then yes, we are very close. We'd be very close
[57:26.920 --> 57:36.480]  to having the title quieted. And then we would be looking to find some serious motivation
[57:36.480 --> 57:43.760]  to get them to cough up something for the last two years of knucklehead hell they put
[57:43.760 --> 57:51.520]  me through all of us through. And then, you know, then we would be done with that at least.
[57:51.520 --> 57:59.040]  And so yeah, that's where we are. Okay. People. Okay. Wonderful. Thank you very
[57:59.040 --> 58:04.560]  much for coming on. And if you want me to look at that document, send me a copy of it.
[58:04.560 --> 58:11.920]  Now look it over. Oh, you bet. It's interesting reading. Thank you very much, Francis. Francis,
[58:11.920 --> 58:16.480]  it sounds like you've come a long way in a short time. Congratulations. I hope it all
[58:16.480 --> 58:25.360]  goes well for you. Uh, thanks to Randy. Bye. Okay. Thank you very much. This is Randy Kelton,
[58:25.360 --> 58:32.880]  Deborah Stevens with our special guest, Steve Skidmore. This is our four hour info marathon.
[58:32.880 --> 58:39.640]  We're about to go to our top of the hour break. We'll be back in about three minutes. So give
[58:39.640 --> 58:44.560]  us a call. We will be taking calls for the rest of the night. We'll be right back.
[59:09.640 --> 59:18.760]  The free books are a three volume set called basic elements of the Christian life chapter
[59:18.760 --> 59:24.280]  by chapter. Basic elements of the Christian life clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.280 --> 59:30.760]  growing in Christ and how to build up the church to order your free new Testament recovery version
[59:30.760 --> 59:45.360]  and basic elements of the Christian life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:45.360 --> 01:00:15.320]  Or visit us online at BFA.org.
[01:00:15.320 --> 01:00:19.280]  John Bush here for your Liberty Beat April 12, 2013.
[01:00:19.280 --> 01:00:27.160]  Gold opened today at $1,558, silver at $27.55, and bitcoin is trading at $70.
[01:00:27.160 --> 01:00:31.520]  Today's edition of the Liberty Beat is sponsored in part by tomorrowsmealstoday.com, South
[01:00:31.520 --> 01:00:37.520]  Austin market days every Saturday from 3 to 7 p.m. at 10106 Manchac Road, and by Silver
[01:00:37.520 --> 01:00:38.520]  Circle Movies.
[01:00:38.520 --> 01:00:42.920]  Special screening Thursday, April 18 at Flix Brewhouse in Round Rock, Texas.
[01:00:42.920 --> 01:00:45.440]  Information at SilverCircleMovie.com.
[01:00:45.440 --> 01:00:46.960]  And now the news.
[01:00:46.960 --> 01:00:51.640]  Russia Today reports that 16-year-old American student Justin Hallman was visited at his
[01:00:51.640 --> 01:00:56.840]  home residence by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation after they were apprised
[01:00:56.840 --> 01:01:00.760]  of his report posted on YouTube for his high school government class.
[01:01:00.760 --> 01:01:05.420]  That report, for which Hallman earned an A-plus grade and strong accolades from his government
[01:01:05.420 --> 01:01:10.240]  teacher Mr. Sparks, led to questioning by agents about why he chose to address certain
[01:01:10.240 --> 01:01:11.560]  topics.
[01:01:11.560 --> 01:01:15.420]  After a brief period of interrogation by the unmanned federal agents, they asked Hallman
[01:01:15.420 --> 01:01:19.680]  that he join their ranks as an undercover agent to spy on Americans who hold similar
[01:01:19.680 --> 01:01:23.580]  concerns as the ones expressed in his essay.
[01:01:23.580 --> 01:01:28.000]  Concerns about the federal government, its overreach, and even the Illuminati.
[01:01:28.000 --> 01:01:31.920]  It is unclear whether Mr. Hallman will be meeting with the FBI again, but it is certain
[01:01:31.920 --> 01:01:41.120]  that he is ready to disclose to the news media more about his strange encounter.
[01:01:41.120 --> 01:01:46.000]  Several years ago, Austinite Devin Contreras was an average healthy 16-year-old adolescent,
[01:01:46.000 --> 01:01:49.760]  but a fateful night in the year 2010 forever changed his destiny.
[01:01:49.760 --> 01:01:53.540]  Exiting out the back door of a big-lot store in Austin, Texas, in an incident police say
[01:01:53.540 --> 01:01:58.000]  was a burglary, Devin paid the ultimate penalty for his unawareness of the seriousness of
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:01:59.000]  his situation.
[01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:03.880]  In four seconds, Contreras was shot 14 times by Austin Police Department officer James
[01:02:03.880 --> 01:02:04.980]  Bowen.
[01:02:04.980 --> 01:02:07.360]  The life of Devin Contreras ended that evening.
[01:02:07.360 --> 01:02:11.440]  Yesterday, federal Judge Sam Sparks ruled that the shooting by Officer Bowen did not
[01:02:11.440 --> 01:02:15.440]  use excessive force, despite the fact that over a dozen rounds of ammunition were fired
[01:02:15.440 --> 01:02:16.440]  at the minor.
[01:02:16.440 --> 01:02:21.260]  However, Judge Sparks did reprimand the police's lack of openness about the topic, determining
[01:02:21.260 --> 01:02:25.760]  that the Austin Police Department showed a, quote, pattern and practice of providing woefully
[01:02:25.760 --> 01:02:33.400]  late and incomplete discovery responses.
[01:02:33.400 --> 01:02:37.480]  With the rise of alternative birthing also comes a rise in the practice of umbilical
[01:02:37.480 --> 01:02:42.760]  cord non-servants, or not cutting the umbilical cord of a newborn directly after birth.
[01:02:42.760 --> 01:02:46.600]  According to ABC News, Mary Callay of Austin, Texas, believes there are many benefits to
[01:02:46.600 --> 01:02:50.980]  leaving an umbilical cord intact after birth, including the final transfusion of blood cells
[01:02:50.980 --> 01:02:56.680]  rich in stem cells and immunoglobin that theoretically can help the infant fight off infections.
[01:02:56.680 --> 01:03:12.480]  Umbilical cords naturally take about 10 days to fall off after birth.
[01:03:12.480 --> 01:03:23.280]  The
[01:03:23.280 --> 01:03:49.560]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, here with our special guest, Steve Skidmore,
[01:03:49.560 --> 01:04:00.440]  and we are going to Dallas in Texas. Tell me I got that right. You got that right. What
[01:04:00.440 --> 01:04:08.000]  do you have for us? Good evening, man. Steve, as I made a comment in the previous section
[01:04:08.000 --> 01:04:16.200]  that it's spoken to someone that had claimed that none of the judges in Texas or several
[01:04:16.200 --> 01:04:22.400]  of the other states had a correct oath of office, and I was wondering because I have
[01:04:22.400 --> 01:04:30.560]  a copy here of an oath of office that appears to be in accordance with the Constitution
[01:04:30.560 --> 01:04:36.280]  of the state of Texas from a county judge in the county where I am property. So I'm
[01:04:36.280 --> 01:04:43.440]  wondering what Steve's thoughts are as to a correct oath of office. Okay. The issue
[01:04:43.440 --> 01:04:50.680]  that was raised in this gentleman's pleading was that there is supposed to be two oaths,
[01:04:50.680 --> 01:04:58.240]  one for the state, one for the United States. Now, he said, the judge said, in this case,
[01:04:58.240 --> 01:05:04.680]  he said, I'm not beholding to the United States Constitution. This man asked him, he
[01:05:04.680 --> 01:05:10.180]  said, are you beholding to the Texas Constitution? He said, I certainly am, yes. Well, let me
[01:05:10.180 --> 01:05:17.180]  draw your attention to, I believe it was something in Article 1 where it said that Texas was
[01:05:17.180 --> 01:05:28.100]  established a free state subject only to the Constitution of the United States. So that
[01:05:28.100 --> 01:05:38.640]  means that their oath is to be to wit, quote unquote, to wit, which means quote unquote.
[01:05:38.640 --> 01:05:47.500]  That means that the verbiage in the United States Constitution is supposed to be quote
[01:05:47.500 --> 01:05:57.000]  unquote, and it is not. They are supposed to have an oath where they will not only protect
[01:05:57.000 --> 01:06:01.280]  the Constitution, but they will obey it.
[01:06:01.280 --> 01:06:06.560]  It's the obey part that they left out. Hey, I'll protect it, you bet. We'll put it in
[01:06:06.560 --> 01:06:10.200]  a glass case, we'll make sure nobody steals it, nobody sets it on fire, it doesn't get
[01:06:10.200 --> 01:06:15.920]  destroyed, okay, it's protected. I fulfilled my duty by that trashy oath. But how about
[01:06:15.920 --> 01:06:16.920]  the obey it part?
[01:06:16.920 --> 01:06:21.920]  Right, and this one just says preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United
[01:06:21.920 --> 01:06:32.040]  States and of this state. So anyway, I just wanted to bring that up. So your point is
[01:06:32.040 --> 01:06:37.600]  good. I understand what you were saying about it. My issue is...
[01:06:37.600 --> 01:06:41.920]  Well, my ultimate point was recuse all, recuse none.
[01:06:41.920 --> 01:06:51.680]  I got you. A few years ago, I purchased some property and it's free and clear, not subject
[01:06:51.680 --> 01:06:59.960]  to beholden any banquing. But the county every year sends out a piece of paper titled Tax
[01:06:59.960 --> 01:07:08.800]  Statement, and it alleges that I owe an arbitrary dollar amount for, I guess, the privilege
[01:07:08.800 --> 01:07:16.680]  of living within the county. I took it to the assessor and I asked her if it was arbitrary
[01:07:16.680 --> 01:07:22.000]  or if it was based on facts but her knowledge, and she told me that it was based on facts
[01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:25.720]  but her knowledge, and I said, excellent, then I must be in the right place. I put it
[01:07:25.720 --> 01:07:28.800]  down on the desk and I split it across here and I said, you wouldn't have any problem
[01:07:28.800 --> 01:07:33.960]  finding that under penalty of perjury. Oh no, we don't do that. I found that very interesting.
[01:07:33.960 --> 01:07:41.200]  So I started reading. And I've come to the conclusion that the property tax code, or
[01:07:41.200 --> 01:07:49.240]  the property and tax code that is in the Texas statute, does not apply to non-commercial
[01:07:49.240 --> 01:07:57.240]  privately owned land, owned by a man, woman, or any other creation of God. Everything is
[01:07:57.240 --> 01:08:04.240]  a statutory term and defined in statute as something other than a man or woman. I got
[01:08:04.240 --> 01:08:11.760]  a call, I withheld paying. The first person to show up at the door was an alleged attorney
[01:08:11.760 --> 01:08:18.960]  for the school district, and he alleged that I had some contractual obligation to the school
[01:08:18.960 --> 01:08:25.360]  district. And I questioned him about the contract, and I questioned him about his cause of action,
[01:08:25.360 --> 01:08:31.680]  and he didn't have any of it. No verified claim, no witnesses, didn't have anything
[01:08:31.680 --> 01:08:41.240]  to offer me. So would you say that a court gains jurisdiction with pleadings sufficient
[01:08:41.240 --> 01:08:49.680]  to invoke the Court's Judicial Power Act? What I'm asking is, if either the plaintiff
[01:08:49.680 --> 01:08:57.080]  or the defendant has no pleadings that were sufficient, then the case is the point. Am
[01:08:57.080 --> 01:09:04.760]  I assuming that correct? The plaintiff would lack standing to invoke
[01:09:04.760 --> 01:09:12.600]  the subject matter jurisdiction of the court. Right. And from what I understand, that an
[01:09:12.600 --> 01:09:19.440]  attorney lacks sufficient standing if he's standing alone, meaning he has to have some
[01:09:19.440 --> 01:09:26.600]  kind of verified complaint or this with personal first-hand knowledge for anybody that's going
[01:09:26.600 --> 01:09:32.960]  to stand up in court and swear or affirm that I've done them wrong or anything else. Is
[01:09:32.960 --> 01:09:38.400]  that correct? Right. Well, the attorney doesn't swear on
[01:09:38.400 --> 01:09:50.440]  his oath. However, under Texas law, the attorney is responsible for the claims that he makes.
[01:09:50.440 --> 01:09:58.000]  The attorney may not accept the veracity of his client. He must perform his own investigation
[01:09:58.000 --> 01:10:02.280]  to ensure that the claims by his client are valid.
[01:10:02.280 --> 01:10:13.280]  Now, if the attorney makes a proactive statement of fact to the court and that statement and
[01:10:13.280 --> 01:10:22.080]  it is material and the statement of fact is untrue, that's aggravated perjury. But normally
[01:10:22.080 --> 01:10:34.580]  the attorney doesn't testify. He submits documents. But if the document that makes a proactive
[01:10:34.580 --> 01:10:44.760]  statement of fact or law, not law, just proactive statement of fact is not authenticated, affirmed
[01:10:44.760 --> 01:10:53.520]  and authenticated by the principal, then it's unacceptable, then it's inadmissible.
[01:10:53.520 --> 01:10:59.840]  The only document that I could see that the attorney could submit before the court would
[01:10:59.840 --> 01:11:11.160]  be the county tax roll. And without the assessor or collector or appraiser verifying that tax
[01:11:11.160 --> 01:11:18.200]  roll to be true and correct to my specific property, how can it be anything but hearsay
[01:11:18.200 --> 01:11:23.640]  or prima facie? Yeah, that would be, you'd have to raise the
[01:11:23.640 --> 01:11:31.800]  objection to it, but that would be inadmissible. If you didn't raise the objection, then they
[01:11:31.800 --> 01:11:38.120]  will accept it because the production of the document and the claim that it is what it
[01:11:38.120 --> 01:11:47.880]  is creates prima facie. Until someone raises an objection and then the one objecting doesn't
[01:11:47.880 --> 01:11:53.280]  have to prove it's not valid, the one who's making the proactive statement has to prove
[01:11:53.280 --> 01:12:01.240]  that it is. Okay. Well, I have sent many requests for public
[01:12:01.240 --> 01:12:08.080]  records for them to define the terms of art that they use and of course they've been non-responsive
[01:12:08.080 --> 01:12:15.720]  and that's a Class A misdemeanor. Well, they've been, they've sent me responses,
[01:12:15.720 --> 01:12:23.320]  but they have not been responses sufficient to define the question.
[01:12:23.320 --> 01:12:32.220]  I really like open records. I have great fun with it. If I can con them into asking me
[01:12:32.220 --> 01:12:44.760]  why I want this information, 911, if they give me an answer that's incomplete, that's
[01:12:44.760 --> 01:12:51.960]  non-responsive, that gets a criminal complaint. If they withhold the information for the purpose
[01:12:51.960 --> 01:13:02.720]  of seeking an opinion from the Attorney General, when there are pre-existing determinations
[01:13:02.720 --> 01:13:11.160]  Class A misdemeanor, I don't negotiate with them, I don't give them legal advice, I just
[01:13:11.160 --> 01:13:19.560]  nail them. Once you hammered them once, next one you filed, you really got their attention.
[01:13:19.560 --> 01:13:26.920]  Well, I think really I have because their first response was a two-page letter, their
[01:13:26.920 --> 01:13:32.800]  second response was a full one-page, and their third response was about three sentences.
[01:13:32.800 --> 01:13:41.280]  So I think I'm beginning to stir the beehive up just a little bit and maybe they're, I'm
[01:13:41.280 --> 01:13:46.240]  hoping they're losing their composure or at least the specific bureaucrat I'm dealing
[01:13:46.240 --> 01:13:53.440]  with. They have invited me to sit down with the county attorney, the assessor, and the
[01:13:53.440 --> 01:14:02.520]  appraiser and discuss the matter further. I suggest absolutely not. Not, not, and that's
[01:14:02.520 --> 01:14:09.600]  exactly what I was thinking. They would lie when the truth would do better. I understand.
[01:14:09.600 --> 01:14:17.480]  I'm right there with you. What do you think about sending them an order to cease this?
[01:14:17.480 --> 01:14:27.200]  Well if they want to have a meeting, then ask them to send you any questions, offer
[01:14:27.200 --> 01:14:32.780]  suggestions that they may have in writing, and you respond to it. Or if they insist on
[01:14:32.780 --> 01:14:41.200]  a meeting, you might go down there with two recorders. One they can see and one they can't.
[01:14:41.200 --> 01:14:51.000]  If you get this QIK app on your cell phone, I have an iPhone and I ordered off of eBay
[01:14:51.000 --> 01:14:58.640]  a cover for the iPhone that has a pocket clip on it. And that pocket clip is perfect because
[01:14:58.640 --> 01:15:08.880]  it's below where the camera is. So I slip it down over my pocket and turn on the QIK
[01:15:08.880 --> 01:15:17.120]  program so it's videotaping and streaming it up to the internet. I've got it in my shirt
[01:15:17.120 --> 01:15:26.680]  pocket and just the other day we were at the House subcommittee and the sergeant at arms
[01:15:26.680 --> 01:15:33.840]  asked Mary to shut off her phone because she's holding it right up in his face. And I was
[01:15:33.840 --> 01:15:38.960]  just standing there grinning at him because I've got mine in my pocket on. So what you
[01:15:38.960 --> 01:15:44.360]  do is you take two, one they can see, one they can't, and when they ask you to turn
[01:15:44.360 --> 01:15:53.580]  the one they can see off, why sure, no problem. That's when they get stupid. We had someone
[01:15:53.580 --> 01:16:01.320]  call in from New York, played the tape of the police officers trying to figure out how
[01:16:01.320 --> 01:16:10.680]  to erase the first recorder. And he's recording them on the second one. If you do have to
[01:16:10.680 --> 01:16:18.060]  go down there and meet with them if they insist, I would absolutely do it that way. But if
[01:16:18.060 --> 01:16:31.280]  you can avoid a face to face, it's about strategy. If they can see you, they feel like they can
[01:16:31.280 --> 01:16:36.200]  read you and they know what they're dealing with. But if they never get to see you, you
[01:16:36.200 --> 01:16:42.480]  sharpshoot them from the mail. They have no idea what they're dealing with. And then especially
[01:16:42.480 --> 01:16:48.560]  if you can con them in to violating the law. That's what I like about open records. I have
[01:16:48.560 --> 01:17:18.440]  one end of the city of Azo. And the day after their time expires, they get a criminal complaint.
[01:17:18.440 --> 01:17:36.880]  Beyond tangy tangerine, the city of Azo, the city of Azo, the city of Azo, the city of
[01:17:36.880 --> 01:17:54.800]  Azo, the city of Azo, the city of Azo, the city of Azo, the city of Azo, the city of
[01:17:54.800 --> 01:17:55.800]  Azo.
[01:17:55.800 --> 01:18:02.160]  Beyond tangy tangerine is available at Brave New Books located at 1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:18:02.160 --> 01:18:05.720]  At Capital Coin in Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:18:05.720 --> 01:18:10.680]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:18:10.680 --> 01:18:14.920]  Capital Coin features a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:18:14.920 --> 01:18:18.600]  In addition to providing the best prices in the nation, we want to bring you the best
[01:18:18.600 --> 01:18:21.760]  shopping experience both in-store and online.
[01:18:21.760 --> 01:18:25.920]  In addition to coins in Bullion, we carry popular young-gevity products such as Beyond
[01:18:25.920 --> 01:18:28.320]  Tangy Tangerine and Pollenburst.
[01:18:28.320 --> 01:18:33.400]  We offer freeze-dried, storable foods by Augustin Farms, Bergey Water products, ammunition at
[01:18:33.400 --> 01:18:35.720]  10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:18:35.720 --> 01:18:40.400]  You can lock in a spot price with our Silver Pool, and we set up metals IRA accounts.
[01:18:40.400 --> 01:18:44.760]  Call us at 512-646-6440 for more details.
[01:18:44.760 --> 01:18:49.920]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:18:49.920 --> 01:18:53.520]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:18:53.520 --> 01:18:59.360]  Visit us at capitalcoininbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:19:23.520 --> 01:19:48.240]  If I can't get everything I want, yeah, I need to get a range, yeah, range, if I can't
[01:19:48.240 --> 01:20:00.800]  get everything I need, I need to get a range, yeah, range, if the people of the world can
[01:20:00.800 --> 01:20:04.720]  get happiness and peace.
[01:20:04.720 --> 01:20:06.640]  You're listening to Rule of Law Radio.
[01:20:06.640 --> 01:20:10.520]  Your hosts, Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, and Eddie Craig.
[01:20:10.520 --> 01:20:12.920]  Debra Stevens and Eddie Craig are off tonight.
[01:20:12.920 --> 01:20:16.160]  Randy is with, Randy is your host.
[01:20:16.160 --> 01:20:20.080]  I'm guest host Steve Skidmore, and Dallas, are you still there?
[01:20:20.080 --> 01:20:21.400]  Wait, wait, wait.
[01:20:21.400 --> 01:20:23.320]  I'd like to make a correction.
[01:20:23.320 --> 01:20:24.320]  Okay.
[01:20:24.320 --> 01:20:26.280]  Eddie's not just off tonight.
[01:20:26.280 --> 01:20:27.280]  Okay.
[01:20:27.280 --> 01:20:29.280]  He's been off since I've known him.
[01:20:29.280 --> 01:20:34.400]  Oh, well, you know, that's a different context.
[01:20:34.400 --> 01:20:39.720]  Objection, Your Honor, out of context.
[01:20:39.720 --> 01:20:43.560]  But Dallas, are you still on with us?
[01:20:43.560 --> 01:20:46.560]  Hello?
[01:20:46.560 --> 01:20:48.560]  Hello?
[01:20:48.560 --> 01:20:50.560]  Yes, Dallas.
[01:20:50.560 --> 01:20:52.560]  Yes, can you hear me?
[01:20:52.560 --> 01:20:54.560]  Yes, we can hear you now.
[01:20:54.560 --> 01:20:58.720]  I've got a couple of questions for you, if you don't mind.
[01:20:58.720 --> 01:21:01.800]  Have you ever paid the taxes on this property since you bought it?
[01:21:01.800 --> 01:21:02.800]  Okay.
[01:21:02.800 --> 01:21:03.800]  Yes, I have.
[01:21:03.800 --> 01:21:04.800]  But I will.
[01:21:04.800 --> 01:21:05.800]  Okay.
[01:21:05.800 --> 01:21:06.800]  No, no, no, no.
[01:21:06.800 --> 01:21:09.840]  That's all I need to know, okay?
[01:21:09.840 --> 01:21:14.280]  Once you have paid the taxes, you have agreed to continue to pay the taxes because you entered
[01:21:14.280 --> 01:21:15.620]  into contract with them.
[01:21:15.620 --> 01:21:21.000]  What you did was you gave them joint ownership interest in the property.
[01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:24.640]  You were going to ask about subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:21:24.640 --> 01:21:30.760]  Yes, the court has subject matter jurisdiction because you entered into a voluntary contract
[01:21:30.760 --> 01:21:32.840]  with the taxing authority.
[01:21:32.840 --> 01:21:36.360]  You saw their authority, so you paid the taxes.
[01:21:36.360 --> 01:21:38.080]  Now you don't want to pay the taxes.
[01:21:38.080 --> 01:21:43.200]  Now what they're doing is invoking a lien that they have had on the property all the
[01:21:43.200 --> 01:21:44.580]  while.
[01:21:44.580 --> 01:21:46.440]  The lien has always been there.
[01:21:46.440 --> 01:21:50.840]  They will not invoke it unless you go delinquent on your payments, okay?
[01:21:50.840 --> 01:21:55.840]  Kind of like Guido coming around and knocking the windows of the store out, pay your taxes.
[01:21:55.840 --> 01:22:01.640]  Now, this is all in equity.
[01:22:01.640 --> 01:22:09.200]  The object would be to take the property out of equity and stuff it right straight down
[01:22:09.200 --> 01:22:13.760]  the throat of common law and close up the top and sew it.
[01:22:13.760 --> 01:22:15.600]  How do you do that?
[01:22:15.600 --> 01:22:22.600]  You accept the original existing land patent from the 1800s, which was issued by the Republic
[01:22:22.600 --> 01:22:23.600]  of Texas.
[01:22:23.600 --> 01:22:32.760]  Now, I don't want to scare anybody with the term or the words Republic of Texas.
[01:22:32.760 --> 01:22:40.920]  This is a political group that existed prior to the state of Texas, who in the 1800s issued
[01:22:40.920 --> 01:22:42.480]  land patents.
[01:22:42.480 --> 01:22:53.440]  Now, if you have a warranty deed that conveyed property to you, you can get a certified
[01:22:53.440 --> 01:22:56.580]  copy of that warranty deed.
[01:22:56.580 --> 01:23:04.120]  If that warranty deed was accompanied by a plat map, you can define by the meets and
[01:23:04.120 --> 01:23:10.160]  bounds described in the plat map exactly what piece of property was conveyed to you.
[01:23:10.160 --> 01:23:12.080]  And I take it you live in Texas.
[01:23:12.080 --> 01:23:18.200]  Texas is very unique in respect to the other sister states in that all the other states
[01:23:18.200 --> 01:23:25.080]  generally deal off of the Bureau of Land Management as where Texas has the general land office.
[01:23:25.080 --> 01:23:29.160]  We have our own land recording office.
[01:23:29.160 --> 01:23:33.720]  You can go to the GLO 1700 North Congress, that's three blocks north of the Capitol here
[01:23:33.720 --> 01:23:38.920]  in Austin, and go into the building in the front door and look to your left, I believe
[01:23:38.920 --> 01:23:40.240]  you'll find the archives room.
[01:23:40.240 --> 01:23:41.240]  Go in there.
[01:23:41.240 --> 01:23:42.240]  Those people live like bats.
[01:23:42.240 --> 01:23:45.880]  They don't see, they don't have much contact with the outside world.
[01:23:45.880 --> 01:23:47.320]  They're very helpful.
[01:23:47.320 --> 01:23:54.200]  You take your plat map and you tell them that you would like some certified copies, probably
[01:23:54.200 --> 01:23:59.480]  four, maybe five of them, get you one on parchment for prosperity, but you would like certified
[01:23:59.480 --> 01:24:07.120]  copies of the existing original land patent as described by your meets and bounds.
[01:24:07.120 --> 01:24:08.120]  They'll go get it.
[01:24:08.120 --> 01:24:09.480]  They'll prepare it any way you want.
[01:24:09.480 --> 01:24:13.720]  It's beautiful when you get it from these people, they make a Christmas package out
[01:24:13.720 --> 01:24:14.720]  of it.
[01:24:14.720 --> 01:24:15.720]  It's gorgeous.
[01:24:15.720 --> 01:24:19.120]  So you'll come away with this.
[01:24:19.120 --> 01:24:25.800]  Now you might want to draft an affidavit of acceptance of the original, of the portion
[01:24:25.800 --> 01:24:32.640]  of the original land patent that you are entitled to, allowing someone else 30, I put it all
[01:24:32.640 --> 01:24:38.620]  in the public records, allow 30 days for anybody to dispute your claim and it's yours.
[01:24:38.620 --> 01:24:47.600]  Now the difference is if you possess property by deed, you possess only ownership interest
[01:24:47.600 --> 01:24:49.060]  in it.
[01:24:49.060 --> 01:24:58.600]  You share a joint ownership interest by equity with the taxing authority.
[01:24:58.600 --> 01:25:07.680]  Now once you have superior title by land patent, you can now challenge the taxing authority
[01:25:07.680 --> 01:25:13.120]  to produce some superior claim to yours and if they cannot, they are to remove it from
[01:25:13.120 --> 01:25:14.120]  the tax rolls.
[01:25:14.120 --> 01:25:18.320]  And Randy and I were talking about this over the break and he's got a little better, better
[01:25:18.320 --> 01:25:26.000]  defined way of going about that and Randy, wait a minute, wait a minute, I caught you
[01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  off guard.
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:28.000]  Didn't I?
[01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  Yeah.
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  I'm having a little trouble hearing.
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:32.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:38.720]  I was saying over the break, when I'm saying that once you accept the original land patent
[01:25:38.720 --> 01:25:45.160]  showing that you now possess ownership instead of versus ownership interest, that you had
[01:25:45.160 --> 01:25:52.040]  a more defined way of challenging the taxing authority's right to claim any kind of lien
[01:25:52.040 --> 01:25:53.680]  rights to your land.
[01:25:53.680 --> 01:26:07.160]  What you do is you send, if you want to be up to date on your taxes, this is a trick.
[01:26:07.160 --> 01:26:14.160]  You send them a letter, you send the taxing authority a letter and ask them if the county
[01:26:14.160 --> 01:26:19.440]  or the state has a claim against your property.
[01:26:19.440 --> 01:26:25.520]  And they're going to take that to mean a lien and they're going to send you back a letter
[01:26:25.520 --> 01:26:27.440]  saying, no, they don't.
[01:26:27.440 --> 01:26:33.780]  Then you send them back, once you have that in hand, then you send them a letter asking
[01:26:33.780 --> 01:26:40.760]  them to remove your property from the public rolls to the private rolls.
[01:26:40.760 --> 01:26:47.720]  And then if they don't do it, then you bring out your land patent and sue to have it moved
[01:26:47.720 --> 01:26:48.720]  to the private rolls.
[01:26:48.720 --> 01:26:52.000]  Once it's on the private rolls, they don't tax you.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:53.000]  Okay.
[01:26:53.000 --> 01:26:57.920]  I would first like to respond to Steve's first question.
[01:26:57.920 --> 01:26:59.920]  The taxes are current.
[01:26:59.920 --> 01:27:04.240]  However, there is no evidence that I paid them.
[01:27:04.240 --> 01:27:07.960]  I, Dallas, the lawful owner of the property has paid them.
[01:27:07.960 --> 01:27:10.560]  It has always been paid in cash.
[01:27:10.560 --> 01:27:11.560]  Never by today.
[01:27:11.560 --> 01:27:12.560]  No signature whatsoever.
[01:27:12.560 --> 01:27:13.560]  Okay.
[01:27:13.560 --> 01:27:20.400]  Secondly, I have accepted the deed, I have a sworn affidavit in the county record that
[01:27:20.400 --> 01:27:29.360]  I am a man who has accepted legal and lawful ownership of this deed and to convey the property
[01:27:29.360 --> 01:27:30.360]  immediately.
[01:27:30.360 --> 01:27:34.080]  Uh, thirdly, okay, wait, hold on.
[01:27:34.080 --> 01:27:37.000]  Let me address that.
[01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:38.860]  The word deed.
[01:27:38.860 --> 01:27:42.000]  By having the deed, you have title.
[01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  Right.
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:50.200]  And title is like the title to your car as opposed to the certificate of ownership, the
[01:27:50.200 --> 01:27:52.800]  original bill of sale.
[01:27:52.800 --> 01:28:03.520]  The title is means that you have effectively ownership in that you get to treat it like
[01:28:03.520 --> 01:28:07.720]  it's yours, but the state still has a claim in it.
[01:28:07.720 --> 01:28:10.760]  This is how the titles came about.
[01:28:10.760 --> 01:28:21.020]  The state sold a lot of property to the citizens and they let them make payments on it.
[01:28:21.020 --> 01:28:27.440]  And while they were making payments on the property, the state issued a title.
[01:28:27.440 --> 01:28:33.560]  Once the property was paid off, then they were to issue a patent, but almost nobody
[01:28:33.560 --> 01:28:36.280]  went and got their patents.
[01:28:36.280 --> 01:28:44.520]  While the state has a claim against your property, they can assess taxes.
[01:28:44.520 --> 01:28:46.020]  So that's how they do that.
[01:28:46.020 --> 01:28:53.020]  Even though you have the deed, the warranty deed, that just means that you're in a partnership
[01:28:53.020 --> 01:28:55.640]  with the state.
[01:28:55.640 --> 01:29:02.040]  You bring the land patent forward and you don't have to file it.
[01:29:02.040 --> 01:29:04.160]  You can if you want to, but you don't have to.
[01:29:04.160 --> 01:29:07.440]  Well, and from what I understand, you don't even have to file a deed.
[01:29:07.440 --> 01:29:09.440]  I mean, it's not, there's no law.
[01:29:09.440 --> 01:29:18.280]  No, you don't have to file anything and if you have, okay, under 13.001 of the Texas
[01:29:18.280 --> 01:29:26.440]  property code, if you have a claim against real property and it is not properly authenticated
[01:29:26.440 --> 01:29:35.480]  or proven and properly filed in the county record, then your claim is unenforceable.
[01:29:35.480 --> 01:29:37.640]  But you don't have to file anything.
[01:29:37.640 --> 01:29:38.640]  That's true.
[01:29:38.640 --> 01:29:44.040]  It's a good idea to do it, but as to the land patent, not necessary.
[01:29:44.040 --> 01:29:46.160]  I hear the music.
[01:29:46.160 --> 01:29:47.160]  Hang on.
[01:29:47.160 --> 01:30:01.880]  Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rula Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:30:01.880 --> 01:30:04.520]  Is your supervisor a snooping scoundrel?
[01:30:04.520 --> 01:30:05.520]  It's possible.
[01:30:05.520 --> 01:30:10.440]  New technologies and social intelligence specialists keep tabs on workers on and off the clock.
[01:30:10.440 --> 01:30:14.980]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment to share more about digital detectives
[01:30:14.980 --> 01:30:16.800]  and workplace woes.
[01:30:16.800 --> 01:30:22.120]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database
[01:30:22.120 --> 01:30:23.840]  of your personal information.
[01:30:23.840 --> 01:30:27.200]  That's creepy, but it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:27.200 --> 01:30:30.320]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:30.320 --> 01:30:34.440]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking
[01:30:34.440 --> 01:30:36.720]  cookies and they're third party certified.
[01:30:36.720 --> 01:30:41.200]  If you don't like big brothers spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:41.200 --> 01:30:44.040]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:44.040 --> 01:30:47.980]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:47.980 --> 01:30:51.320]  Supervisors with stealthy spy software are snooping on employees.
[01:30:51.320 --> 01:30:55.880]  Two-thirds of businesses monitor company internet use and nearly half keep tabs on employee
[01:30:55.880 --> 01:30:59.020]  emails and it doesn't stop when you leave the workplace.
[01:30:59.020 --> 01:31:04.000]  Firms are hiring social media specialists to scour the internet for incriminating activities.
[01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:08.920]  If you don a wet t-shirt on Facebook or turn traitor on Twitter, their investigations could
[01:31:08.920 --> 01:31:10.640]  put an end to your career.
[01:31:10.640 --> 01:31:12.460]  It's often perfectly legal.
[01:31:12.460 --> 01:31:16.640]  Companies generally aren't entitled to privacy when using company equipment and social media
[01:31:16.640 --> 01:31:17.640]  sites are a free-for-all.
[01:31:17.640 --> 01:31:22.240]  So if you want to keep your job, clean up your internet act, review your company's technology
[01:31:22.240 --> 01:31:25.560]  guidelines and remember that digital digressions could do you in.
[01:31:25.560 --> 01:31:27.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:27.560 --> 01:31:32.440]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:32.440 --> 01:31:36.560]  Here at Zombie Killer Ammo and Guns, we believe that the Second Amendment guarantees our rights
[01:31:36.560 --> 01:31:40.020]  as citizens to be able to defend ourselves and our loved ones.
[01:31:40.020 --> 01:31:43.480]  We also believe that the right to carry weapons comes with the responsibility of being safe
[01:31:43.480 --> 01:31:45.080]  and smart about guns.
[01:31:45.080 --> 01:31:52.400]  So if you're going to be in the Corpus Christi area, give us a call at 361-704-6103.
[01:31:52.400 --> 01:31:56.020]  Ask for Chris or Portia and mention this radio ad for a 10% discount.
[01:31:56.020 --> 01:31:58.640]  We can ship ammo, parts and accessories.
[01:31:58.640 --> 01:32:02.720]  Like us on Facebook at Zombie Killers, LLC.
[01:32:02.720 --> 01:32:09.040]  At HempUSA.org, we offer chemical-free products to people around the world, detoxifying, self-healing
[01:32:09.040 --> 01:32:11.200]  while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:32:11.200 --> 01:32:16.920]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest selling product, micro plant powder.
[01:32:16.920 --> 01:32:22.920]  Our micro plant powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc and silica to help rebuild
[01:32:22.920 --> 01:32:26.520]  the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[01:32:26.520 --> 01:32:30.600]  Micro plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage
[01:32:30.600 --> 01:32:31.600]  shelter.
[01:32:31.600 --> 01:32:36.760]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at HempUSA.org and remember all of our products
[01:32:36.760 --> 01:32:38.880]  are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:32:38.880 --> 01:32:43.640]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality and rapid shipping
[01:32:43.640 --> 01:32:44.640]  anywhere.
[01:32:44.640 --> 01:32:48.020]  And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:32:48.020 --> 01:32:54.280]  Please visit us at HempUSA.org or call 908-691-2608.
[01:32:54.280 --> 01:32:57.560]  That's 908-691-2608.
[01:32:57.560 --> 01:33:01.640]  See what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you at HempUSA.org.
[01:33:01.640 --> 01:33:17.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:17.000 --> 01:33:38.520]  Thank you.
[01:33:38.520 --> 01:34:01.600]  I am your guest host Steve Skidmore and Randy I'd like to thank you again for the invitation
[01:34:01.600 --> 01:34:06.440]  I was on last night and we just got carried away, didn't have a chance to take callers
[01:34:06.440 --> 01:34:12.740]  but Dallas oh yeah and the call-in number folks if you'd like to call in is area code
[01:34:12.740 --> 01:34:25.040]  512-646-1984 Dallas did we throw a wrench in your gears or what you got other questions
[01:34:25.040 --> 01:34:32.000]  what where are we going from here actually I had a couple well I had one more specific
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:42.320]  question if I decide to proceed with a suit would you recommend that or in your opinion
[01:34:42.320 --> 01:34:50.320]  would it be better to do it at the county level or would I have a better chance taking
[01:34:50.320 --> 01:34:57.400]  it to federal district court being that at the county level I mean they're all it's kind
[01:34:57.400 --> 01:35:06.040]  of I mean they're all intertwined okay I mean issues the issue chooses venue okay so the
[01:35:06.040 --> 01:35:11.320]  issue the issue chooses venue in that you've got to do your research and find out what
[01:35:11.320 --> 01:35:17.680]  issue you're going to bring to court and what the proper venue for that is okay if this
[01:35:17.680 --> 01:35:24.600]  is a suit concerning property within the state unless they violated some federal law you're
[01:35:24.600 --> 01:35:30.000]  not going to be able to get to the federal court but what would be your cause of action
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:44.080]  well in federal court my cause of action would be a deprivation of freedom of religious expression
[01:35:44.080 --> 01:35:51.320]  and if you'd like me to expound on that I would otherwise in the in the district court
[01:35:51.320 --> 01:35:58.400]  of the county it would be for fraud malfeasance of office streets of fiduciary duty conversion
[01:35:58.400 --> 01:36:10.760]  okay how do you get to those well first where's your nexus to freedom religion violation freedom
[01:36:10.760 --> 01:36:20.120]  religion well they are attempting by labeling me a natural person or corporation to diminish
[01:36:20.120 --> 01:36:28.960]  my standing as a man as described in genesis 1 chapter 26 or just chapter 1 verse 26 and
[01:36:28.960 --> 01:36:34.280]  I'll tell you right now let's lose an argument I hate to tell it to you I hate to say it
[01:36:34.280 --> 01:36:40.280]  because I know where you're coming from and you're right but that's a losing proposition
[01:36:40.280 --> 01:36:48.680]  that's not a legal claim that's a religious claim right and if it's not rooted in statute
[01:36:48.680 --> 01:36:53.600]  you don't that won't give you a claim there won't be a chance to argue it yeah and there's
[01:36:53.600 --> 01:37:05.680]  a reason I was asking if the tax assessor collector sends you a bill this is not fraud
[01:37:05.680 --> 01:37:13.200]  if you pay it it would if if the bill is invalid it would only become fraud if they took action
[01:37:13.200 --> 01:37:24.440]  against you for not paying then a harm would occur them sending you a bill does no harm
[01:37:24.440 --> 01:37:30.840]  well if I mean the the threat of the repercussion of not paying it is forfeiture of property
[01:37:30.840 --> 01:37:37.280]  but that hasn't happened yet no but if I can't establish that the statutes apply to me then
[01:37:37.280 --> 01:37:41.840]  there is no reason they should either where's your where's your nexus to damage right now
[01:37:41.840 --> 01:37:49.480]  where's your nexus to damage how they harmed you well if I had to deal with it in court
[01:37:49.480 --> 01:37:56.400]  as a defendant I mean if it hadn't happened yet you haven't got a claim you're right if
[01:37:56.400 --> 01:38:00.000]  you're talking about federal if you're talking about taking us into the federal venue if
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:04.480]  I were opposing attorney rule 12 b6 would be the first thing to come to my mind yeah
[01:38:04.480 --> 01:38:13.000]  because you can't sue for a harm that might accrue correct so I actually have to if if
[01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:20.520]  I was to I understand what you're saying there actually has to be a harm yes it's like the
[01:38:20.520 --> 01:38:27.680]  military commissions act it is horribly horribly unconstitutional and we can't challenge it
[01:38:27.680 --> 01:38:33.820]  until they invoke it but once they invoked it they did they do away with all the laws
[01:38:33.820 --> 01:38:40.720]  in the legislature so we can't challenge it that one's a catch-22 how about trespass I
[01:38:40.720 --> 01:38:45.860]  mean they're attempting to trespass on my property well let's go to trespass if you
[01:38:45.860 --> 01:38:50.360]  accept the land patent on that and get that all done correctly and properly and up to
[01:38:50.360 --> 01:38:56.560]  snuff you get to sue not only for trespass but now you can take it into the federal venue
[01:38:56.560 --> 01:39:05.000]  under patent infringement even more incentive okay okay well just then just so you know
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:09.400]  I have done some research on the land patent and the texas general land still even has
[01:39:09.400 --> 01:39:16.520]  a patent clerk so then keep researching until you figure it out and it makes sense because
[01:39:16.520 --> 01:39:21.920]  from what from my research and uh judging basically basically on the research of others
[01:39:21.920 --> 01:39:28.600]  and my thanks goes out to all who sent have sent me information regarding this that once
[01:39:28.600 --> 01:39:34.600]  you once you get that original portion of the get your portion of that original land
[01:39:34.600 --> 01:39:40.920]  patent accepted you're pretty much bulletproof I mean I hate to use the term because there's
[01:39:40.920 --> 01:39:47.800]  no such thing but a right not exerted is a right not claimed it's a it's a right you
[01:39:47.800 --> 01:39:52.720]  don't have and if you haven't taken the proper measures you don't have rights because there's
[01:39:52.720 --> 01:39:59.000]  someone else that has rights right along with you until you get out of equity and into common
[01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:04.520]  law you're going to be fighting an uphill battle I promise you appreciate you guys giving
[01:40:04.520 --> 01:40:11.760]  me all this time tonight and uh sure keep studying thank you very much you're welcome
[01:40:11.760 --> 01:40:22.280]  thank you dallas now we're going to go to johnny in texas hey guys hello johnny hey
[01:40:22.280 --> 01:40:29.760]  randy I have a question for you uh starting before my uh primary question you keep referring
[01:40:29.760 --> 01:40:34.760]  to your very special guest steve skidmore and I'm wondering in what context do you use
[01:40:34.760 --> 01:40:45.880]  the term special short bus kicked butt took names steve was the first guy ever helped
[01:40:45.880 --> 01:40:54.040]  he was a broadcaster on the network when uh we had a foreclosure issue came to me one
[01:40:54.040 --> 01:40:59.360]  day and said I need a lawsuit I told him I'm still doing my research I'm not ready he said
[01:40:59.360 --> 01:41:03.440]  I don't have time for you to be ready so I went on the internet and pulled out a bunch
[01:41:03.440 --> 01:41:12.480]  of junk stuck it together and he filed suit and it stopped the eviction and then the lawyer
[01:41:12.480 --> 01:41:17.320]  on the other side filed a motion to dismiss essentially said this suit's piece of crap
[01:41:17.320 --> 01:41:24.840]  and the judge read the suit and said yep you're right the suit's piece of crap fix it we filed
[01:41:24.840 --> 01:41:30.480]  a I think it was three of them before we got one to stick wasn't it yeah and then he went
[01:41:30.480 --> 01:41:39.800]  and msj yeah and then from there steve went on his own and dumped me like a hot rock and
[01:41:39.800 --> 01:41:47.640]  got some good documents filed and fought them for what five years six four years in four
[01:41:47.640 --> 01:41:53.400]  years in court six years uh total I did a lot of I tried a lot of administrative I tried
[01:41:53.400 --> 01:42:03.960]  two years of administrative remedy before going into court yep well you tell them what
[01:42:03.960 --> 01:42:10.160]  what your position is now relative to the mortgage my position relative now to the mortgage
[01:42:10.160 --> 01:42:21.200]  is there's not one yep I am actually familiar with the history of your case and yes you
[01:42:21.200 --> 01:42:28.960]  are I learned over the break who Johnny in Texas was and uh thank you um congratulations
[01:42:28.960 --> 01:42:33.200]  the gentleman that we've got on folks for the rest of the listeners sake is one probably
[01:42:33.200 --> 01:42:39.880]  one of the the strongest researchers I know Johnny thank you uh this is the gentleman
[01:42:39.880 --> 01:42:49.760]  that sent me a lot of case law regarding standing uh jurisdiction I mean uh and by the way the
[01:42:49.760 --> 01:42:57.800]  attorneys that have seen my uh my appeal brief said that I was real long-winded on the case
[01:42:57.800 --> 01:43:09.120]  law but I'm a pro se I can do that yeah exactly I feel as a pro se I felt compelled to do
[01:43:09.120 --> 01:43:16.080]  that because I didn't want to leave any wiggle room for a for a judiciary or a judge to take
[01:43:16.080 --> 01:43:22.480]  advantage of me well I do it I wanted them to know that hey look I know what I know and
[01:43:22.480 --> 01:43:30.280]  here it is yeah I do it to the point of overkill intentionally to to give them as much if they're
[01:43:30.280 --> 01:43:34.280]  going to refute it they're going to they're going to spend a whole lot of time refuting
[01:43:34.280 --> 01:43:41.080]  a whole lot of cases absolutely yes well I hear the music in the background we're going
[01:43:41.080 --> 01:43:47.080]  to go to break in don't go away Johnny we'll be right back after this break folks 512-646-1984
[01:43:47.080 --> 01:43:55.200]  is the number to call if you'd like to join us Randy okay thank you all for being here
[01:43:55.200 --> 01:44:01.640]  and hang on we'll be right back on the other side
[01:44:01.640 --> 01:44:06.600]  it is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM but finding things on the internet isn't so
[01:44:06.600 --> 01:44:11.440]  easy and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with oh well I guess you haven't
[01:44:11.440 --> 01:44:16.720]  heard of brave new books then brave new books yes brave new books has all the books and
[01:44:16.720 --> 01:44:21.900]  DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones Ron Paul Angie Edward Griffin they even
[01:44:21.900 --> 01:44:27.800]  stock inner food Berkey products and Calvin soaps there's no way a place like that exists
[01:44:27.800 --> 01:44:33.760]  go check it out for yourself it's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street just south of UT
[01:44:33.760 --> 01:44:38.960]  by UT there's never anywhere to park down there actually they now offer a free hour
[01:44:38.960 --> 01:44:44.160]  of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore
[01:44:44.160 --> 01:44:51.800]  it does exist but when are they open Monday through Saturday 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to
[01:44:51.800 --> 01:44:58.760]  6 p.m. on Sundays so give them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at brave new
[01:44:58.760 --> 01:45:06.360]  bookstore dot-com are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit when your case without
[01:45:06.360 --> 01:45:12.520]  an attorney with jurisdictionary the affordable easy to understand for CD course that will
[01:45:12.520 --> 01:45:19.440]  show you how in 24 hours step by step if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should
[01:45:19.440 --> 01:45:25.000]  be doing if you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have
[01:45:25.000 --> 01:45:31.480]  won with our step-by-step course and now you can to jurisdictionary was created by a licensed
[01:45:31.480 --> 01:45:38.200]  attorney with 22 years of case winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn
[01:45:38.200 --> 01:45:43.040]  what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our
[01:45:43.040 --> 01:45:50.720]  American courts you'll receive our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases
[01:45:50.720 --> 01:45:57.240]  pro se tactics and much more please visit rule of law radio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:57.240 --> 01:46:27.200]  or call toll free 866-LAW-EASY.
[01:46:27.240 --> 01:46:49.200]  866-LAW-EASY.
[01:46:49.200 --> 01:47:04.160]  866-LAW-EASY.
[01:47:04.160 --> 01:47:15.160]  866-LAW-EASY.
[01:47:15.160 --> 01:47:19.440]  You move quickly we've got three more callers.
[01:47:19.440 --> 01:47:28.240]  Okay well regarding what you call the routine I have a couple of district attorneys that
[01:47:28.240 --> 01:47:34.600]  I need to file a an onslaught of criminal charges against and in the past you've talked
[01:47:34.600 --> 01:47:43.400]  about filing those types of complaints with a magistrate but here lately you've you have
[01:47:43.400 --> 01:47:49.560]  shifted and to you've talked about filing those with the attorney general pursuant to
[01:47:49.560 --> 01:47:59.120]  39.015 Texas penal code and when I read that statute it says with the consent of the appropriate
[01:47:59.120 --> 01:48:04.520]  local county or district attorney the attorney general has concurrent diction with that consenting
[01:48:04.520 --> 01:48:11.960]  local prosecutor to prosecute an offense under this chapter so okay here's the issue consent
[01:48:11.960 --> 01:48:21.680]  is the issue the if the prosecutor is the accused there's two options either the prosecutor
[01:48:21.680 --> 01:48:29.680]  must petition the district court to appoint an attorney pro tem or since the attorney
[01:48:29.680 --> 01:48:38.200]  general has concurrent jurisdiction then we follow with the attorney general since he
[01:48:38.200 --> 01:48:45.560]  has concurrent jurisdiction and since the the district attorney is disqualified then
[01:48:45.560 --> 01:48:52.200]  it would naturally fall to the attorney general.
[01:48:52.200 --> 01:48:59.800]  Okay so he would he would have the consent of well I guess what I'm not making the connection
[01:48:59.800 --> 01:49:04.060]  on is how would how would he have the consent of the district attorney.
[01:49:04.060 --> 01:49:09.160]  I'm saying he wouldn't need the consent of the the district attorney because the district
[01:49:09.160 --> 01:49:16.360]  attorney could not possibly give consent because he is the accused and he is disqualified.
[01:49:16.360 --> 01:49:26.280]  Okay so I'm okay this is this would go to the intent of the legislature that the attorney
[01:49:26.280 --> 01:49:30.680]  general have concurrent jurisdiction so when one is disqualified the other one is still
[01:49:30.680 --> 01:49:36.480]  in place and it would eliminate the necessity of petitioning for appointment of an attorney
[01:49:36.480 --> 01:49:40.120]  pro tem to prosecute the prosecutor.
[01:49:40.120 --> 01:49:44.560]  All I want to do is get it in the hands of the attorney general and then when he refuses
[01:49:44.560 --> 01:49:51.280]  to act on it file against him let him make his arguments we don't care and you would
[01:49:51.280 --> 01:49:56.920]  file that with a magistrate correct yeah no no but when I come back from the attorney
[01:49:56.920 --> 01:50:04.080]  general then we'll file directly with the grand jury or it depends on how much how much
[01:50:04.080 --> 01:50:11.560]  time you've got if you're not in a hurry I'd file it with a district judge I don't have
[01:50:11.560 --> 01:50:16.520]  I don't only file it with a magistrate if you just want to jerk the magistrate around
[01:50:16.520 --> 01:50:22.920]  but if you filed with a district judge he's the highest level judicial official in the
[01:50:22.920 --> 01:50:33.200]  district so if you've got him uh he pretty well lords over everybody below him you don't
[01:50:33.200 --> 01:50:40.480]  have to go through all those little steps you know magistrate county judge district
[01:50:40.480 --> 01:50:45.840]  judge just go straight to the district judge or I even you know travis county I like the
[01:50:45.840 --> 01:50:53.560]  chief justice of the supreme they're all magistrates and mike just filed a bunch of complaints
[01:50:53.560 --> 01:51:01.960]  with the the supreme court and they trashed them so now you get claims against them you
[01:51:01.960 --> 01:51:07.940]  bring all of these people back to the grand jury so in short you can go to any of them
[01:51:07.940 --> 01:51:15.520]  you want to but uh district attorney attorney general attorney general is very political
[01:51:15.520 --> 01:51:20.240]  you get him involved he is not going to like you following criminal charges against him
[01:51:20.240 --> 01:51:27.160]  even if they won't hold up when he gets an opponent the opponent's going to be waving
[01:51:27.160 --> 01:51:31.360]  those charges in front of the public so this will create a lot of politics and that's what
[01:51:31.360 --> 01:51:36.840]  it's all about then when we come back to the grand jury well we've got everybody here who
[01:51:36.840 --> 01:51:44.880]  do we take it to everybody you would take it to we've already disqualified okay and
[01:51:44.880 --> 01:51:52.040]  that's really for the grand jury's purpose edification it's just to give them reason
[01:51:52.040 --> 01:51:58.880]  to look at it because we've disqualified everybody else does that make sense yeah it does and
[01:51:58.880 --> 01:52:02.680]  I don't have a lot of time so I'll probably just try to get it to the grand jury as quickly
[01:52:02.680 --> 01:52:08.240]  as I can but and I also wanted to comment on your caller mike earlier where they're
[01:52:08.240 --> 01:52:13.600]  trying to force his case to mediation they tried to do that with me in a district court
[01:52:13.600 --> 01:52:20.160]  case and the judge basically said that she was not going to go any further with my case
[01:52:20.160 --> 01:52:26.080]  until I agreed to go to mediation I hit her with a whole bunch of case law actually I
[01:52:26.080 --> 01:52:30.600]  have a friend who went to law school and she didn't quite make the cut and the law school
[01:52:30.600 --> 01:52:36.320]  told her well you can't be an attorney but you would make a great mediator and that got
[01:52:36.320 --> 01:52:39.980]  me to thinking and I started doing some research on this whole mediation thing and a lot of
[01:52:39.980 --> 01:52:45.400]  the time these mediations are conducted by people who are not lawyers not judges they're
[01:52:45.400 --> 01:52:52.320]  just unelected done appointed bureaucrats who don't oftentimes don't know a whole lot
[01:52:52.320 --> 01:52:57.080]  and then in that study I came across a lot of case law that says if you agree to take
[01:52:57.080 --> 01:53:05.120]  a case to mediation and people who perform the mediation don't know the law and they
[01:53:05.120 --> 01:53:11.080]  rule you know they rule against you they they issue a ruling with some becoming even if
[01:53:11.080 --> 01:53:17.760]  they even if their ruling isn't you know a complete odds with the law you agreed to take
[01:53:17.760 --> 01:53:22.480]  it there and so whatever decision they issue is binding and I raised some objections over
[01:53:22.480 --> 01:53:26.280]  that and finally got the district court to agree that okay no we don't have to go to
[01:53:26.280 --> 01:53:31.200]  mediation so I just if mike's still listening he might want to do a little bit of research
[01:53:31.200 --> 01:53:37.520]  on that yeah well but mike the reason mike brought that up his judge had already dismissed
[01:53:37.520 --> 01:53:43.920]  the case before he ordered mediation yeah yeah no I know that but they they try to force
[01:53:43.920 --> 01:53:53.520]  you out of court into a private you know incompetent proceeding and and even if these people just
[01:53:53.520 --> 01:53:57.360]  totally screw up and totally misconstrue the law and the issue of ruling that's totally
[01:53:57.360 --> 01:54:02.560]  at odds with the law you're stuck with it if you agree to take it there so you know
[01:54:02.560 --> 01:54:06.520]  he made he made have grounds to raise some issues just over the fact that they're trying
[01:54:06.520 --> 01:54:13.200]  to force them there anyway good good to get the rest of your callers okay thank you john
[01:54:13.200 --> 01:54:26.760]  okay now we're going to go to k new mexico hello k hi randy how are you yeah I saw your
[01:54:26.760 --> 01:54:36.000]  husband on there but he's probably dead hidden probably so he wanted to swing by and hang
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:42.560]  out with you but I don't think that that got to happen from what I I had brief conversations
[01:54:42.560 --> 01:54:48.080]  like did you get to see randy he's like no they loaded me too late I was like whatever
[01:54:48.080 --> 01:54:58.600]  truck driver but uh um anyway I wanted to tell you about my ongoing fun and I use that
[01:54:58.600 --> 01:55:07.360]  term very loosely because quite frankly I'm so I'm not really having a lot of fun with
[01:55:07.360 --> 01:55:20.920]  this yes um my I you know got taken to court for the careless driving citation and um well
[01:55:20.920 --> 01:55:27.800]  I finally got my jury trial they found me guilty of careless driving and but before
[01:55:27.800 --> 01:55:33.440]  you know the jury the trial actually took place I filed my motions and I raised the
[01:55:33.440 --> 01:55:41.400]  challenge to jurisdiction and he goes the magistrate said no denied like how can you
[01:55:41.400 --> 01:55:50.920]  deny this I'm I'm challenging this and so that got denied um the state trooper was still
[01:55:50.920 --> 01:55:59.460]  acting as prosecutor and so I filed a motion to disqualify the opposing counsel since how
[01:55:59.460 --> 01:56:08.320]  can he be both witness and prosecutor at the same time that got denied um and I objected
[01:56:08.320 --> 01:56:14.720]  to the magistrate entered plea of not guilty from the previous magistrate which we got
[01:56:14.720 --> 01:56:24.120]  recused that was pretty awesome because he's he's just a horrid horrid person and I demanded
[01:56:24.120 --> 01:56:32.240]  uh I put in a demand for nature and cause and all of that got denied um and now you
[01:56:32.240 --> 01:56:37.680]  know I'm faced with going to the district court and appeal and while I handled everything
[01:56:37.680 --> 01:56:47.640]  decently I'm absolutely terrified of going before the district attorney because um I
[01:56:47.640 --> 01:56:55.840]  I kind of lose focus and I not exceptionally fast on my feet thinking in regards to these
[01:56:55.840 --> 01:57:01.520]  types of things like you know one of my goats gives birth to twins and one's breach I can
[01:57:01.520 --> 01:57:06.480]  handle that you know I got a fence coming down in a 70 mile an hour okay hold on hold
[01:57:06.480 --> 01:57:13.780]  on let me give you a tool to work with okay we go to school for 12 years of government
[01:57:13.780 --> 01:57:22.840]  mandated school and in that school uh under they're required to in texas we have the house
[01:57:22.840 --> 01:57:28.240]  bill 72 that says the school shall instill in the child a deep and abiding faith in and
[01:57:28.240 --> 01:57:33.080]  respect for the american form of government they do that right but while they're doing
[01:57:33.080 --> 01:57:39.740]  that they very actively demonstrate to you that while you have all these rights as long
[01:57:39.740 --> 01:57:44.180]  as you're in this school don't even think of trying to exert one of them the whole weight
[01:57:44.180 --> 01:57:49.580]  of the system a fall right square on your head right so we get out of school 12 years
[01:57:49.580 --> 01:57:57.280]  of school and we talk about all these rights but we have the experience of what happens
[01:57:57.280 --> 01:58:04.540]  to us when we try to exert one right I went into to court with people who were just absolutely
[01:58:04.540 --> 01:58:10.440]  terrified and that's what it occurred to be they were kids going before the principal
[01:58:10.440 --> 01:58:16.160]  you are not the child going before the principal you are the sovereign going before the servant
[01:58:16.160 --> 01:58:26.100]  you're the parent before the principal that district attorney is your servant I they wouldn't
[01:58:26.100 --> 01:58:31.220]  let me videotape a hearing the other day I walked right out and got the head of security
[01:58:31.220 --> 01:58:37.540]  demanded the rest the chairman of the house subcommittee that was so much fun and we are
[01:58:37.540 --> 01:58:42.740]  out of time this is Randy Calvin Davis Stevens with our special guest Steve Skidmore thank
[01:58:42.740 --> 01:58:50.780]  you all for listening we will be back Monday and I'll be back Friday thank you all Bibles
[01:58:50.780 --> 01:58:56.840]  for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.840 --> 01:59:02.300]  recovery version the New Testament recovery version has over 9000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.300 --> 01:59:07.860]  what the Bible says verse by verse helping you to know God and to know the meaning of
[01:59:07.860 --> 01:59:16.940]  life order your free copy today from Bibles for America call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:16.940 --> 01:59:23.820]  or visit us online at BFA.org this translation is highly accurate and it comes with over
[01:59:23.820 --> 01:59:30.300]  13,000 cross references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible
[01:59:30.300 --> 01:59:35.540]  this is truly a Bible you can understand to get your free copy of the New Testament recovery
[01:59:35.540 --> 01:59:46.820]  version call us toll free at 888-551-0102 that's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at
[01:59:46.820 --> 01:59:56.780]  BFA.org