ROL_2013-03-29_16k_Hr3-4.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:10.600] You're listening to the Liberty Beasts, your daily source for Liberty News and activist
[00:10.600 --> 00:15.880] updates online at TheLibertyBeat.com.
[00:15.880 --> 00:20.480] John Bush here with your Liberty Beasts on March 22, 2013.
[00:20.480 --> 00:30.080] Hold open today at $1,609, silver at $28.98.96, and Bitcoin is trading at $72.95.
[00:30.080 --> 00:34.000] Today's edition of Liberty Beat is sponsored and farmed by Brave New Books, your central
[00:34.000 --> 00:41.240] Texas supplier of One World Way and Tangy Tangerine, online at bravenewbookstore.com.
[00:41.240 --> 00:44.520] And now the news.
[00:44.520 --> 00:48.840] A program aimed at rewarding people who blow the whistle on illegal gun owners has yet
[00:48.840 --> 00:52.640] to show significant results as three police agencies in New York.
[00:52.640 --> 00:58.880] In February of 2012, 11 months before the passage of NYSafe Act, Governor Cuomo's office announced
[00:58.880 --> 01:01.680] a four-pronged initiative to curb gun violence.
[01:01.680 --> 01:05.360] One of the programs was a cash reward for citizens who lead police to the arrest and
[01:05.360 --> 01:07.920] confiscation of illegal firearms.
[01:07.920 --> 01:12.120] Known as the gun tip line, New Yorkers can call a toll-free hotline to alert police if
[01:12.120 --> 01:14.480] they believe someone they know has an illegal gun.
[01:14.480 --> 01:18.320] The call would be picked up by state police and local law enforcement would be notified
[01:18.320 --> 01:20.160] if the tip seemed reliable.
[01:20.160 --> 01:28.180] If there was an arrest, the tipster would receive as much as $500.
[01:28.180 --> 01:32.560] The U.S. government is expanding a cybersecurity program that scans internet traffic headed
[01:32.560 --> 01:36.960] into and out of defense contractors to include far more of the country's private civilian
[01:36.960 --> 01:38.240] run infrastructure.
[01:38.240 --> 01:42.120] As a result, more private sector employees than ever before, including those at big banks,
[01:42.120 --> 01:46.360] utilities, and key transportation companies, will have their emails and web surfing scanned
[01:46.360 --> 01:48.960] as a precaution against cyberattacks.
[01:48.960 --> 01:52.520] Under last month's White House executive order on cybersecurity, the scans will be driven
[01:52.520 --> 01:56.920] by classified information provided by U.S. intelligence agencies, including data from
[01:56.920 --> 02:02.120] the National Security Agency, on new or specifically serious espionage threats and other hacking
[02:02.120 --> 02:07.320] attempts.
[02:07.320 --> 02:10.960] Republican amendments to the Senate's budget proposal would require President Obama and
[02:10.960 --> 02:14.640] Vice President Biden to get their medical care through the new exchanges created by
[02:14.640 --> 02:16.960] Obama's signature health care law.
[02:16.960 --> 02:21.240] Senators Susan Collins, Republican from Maine and Kelly Iote, Republican from New Hampshire
[02:21.240 --> 02:25.120] both offered amendments to move the President and Vice President into the health care law
[02:25.120 --> 02:26.720] as an exchange.
[02:26.720 --> 02:30.800] After the Affordable Care Act passed, the White House said Obama would enroll in exchange
[02:30.800 --> 02:33.360] once the time came in 2014.
[02:33.360 --> 02:37.400] Collins and Iote's amendment would require the President, the Vice President, and the
[02:37.400 --> 02:42.920] Cabinet to put their premiums where their politics are.
[02:42.920 --> 02:46.960] The Liberty Beat is sponsored in part by Pure Rain, chemical and fluoride free bottled water
[02:46.960 --> 02:52.360] available at Central Market and Whole Foods grocery stores, online at purerainusa.com and
[02:52.360 --> 02:57.400] by Central Texas Gun Works, self-defense training, CHL courses and firearm sales, online at
[02:57.400 --> 02:59.400] centraltexasgunworks.com.
[02:59.400 --> 03:25.400] Well, I received my remedy today, it came in a box just like the face I accepted it
[03:25.400 --> 03:50.400] for the first time in my life, it came in a box just like the face I accepted it for
[03:50.400 --> 03:54.400] the first time in my life, it came in a box just like the face I accepted it for the first
[03:54.400 --> 03:55.400] time in my life.
[03:55.400 --> 03:58.660] We just finished with courtroom professionalism.
[03:58.660 --> 04:06.740] We're going to go to selection of jurors.
[04:06.740 --> 04:11.820] The prosecutor should prepare himself or herself prior to trial to discharge effectively the
[04:11.820 --> 04:17.880] prosecut- prosecution function in the Selection of the jury and the Exercise of Challenges
[04:17.880 --> 04:22.100] for Cause, and Preemptory Challenges.
[04:22.100 --> 04:28.300] In those cases where it appears necessary to conduct a pretrial investigation of the
[04:28.300 --> 04:36.100] background of jurors, investigatory methods of the prosecutor should neither harass nor
[04:36.100 --> 04:42.940] unduly embarrass potential jurors or invade their privacy and, whenever possible, should
[04:42.940 --> 04:51.340] be restricted to an investigation of records and sources of information already in existence.
[04:51.340 --> 04:57.580] The opportunity to question jurors personally should be used solely to obtain information
[04:57.580 --> 05:01.100] for the intelligent exercise of challenges.
[05:01.100 --> 05:09.940] A prosecutor should not intentionally use the Vaudière to present factual matter which
[05:09.940 --> 05:16.180] the prosecutor knows will not be admissible at trial or to argue the prosecution's case
[05:16.180 --> 05:18.180] to the jury.
[05:18.180 --> 05:26.340] Now this is often a problem with prosaise who don't understand the nature of what they're
[05:26.340 --> 05:31.060] doing in selecting a jury.
[05:31.060 --> 05:36.860] This is where they get hammered by the judge quite a bit and that's a problem because the
[05:36.860 --> 05:45.780] first time the jury sees you, you have the judge pounding on you for everything you say
[05:45.780 --> 05:55.420] to the jury and you have to be prepared because the prosecutor will object to everything you
[05:55.420 --> 06:06.980] say, whether it's proper or not, they use this as your first introduction to the jury
[06:06.980 --> 06:16.700] and they object constantly in order to keep you from getting any kind of momentum and
[06:16.700 --> 06:23.020] getting any kind of rapport with the jury.
[06:23.020 --> 06:33.780] When I was in a traffic court in Temple, Texas, I kind of overcame that because I told the
[06:33.780 --> 06:39.380] jury that the prosecutor is going to bring an officer up here and he's going to tell
[06:39.380 --> 06:48.980] you that I was speeding and that's true it was and it really kicked the struts out from
[06:48.980 --> 06:54.500] under the prosecutor, he didn't object once while I went through that until I accused
[06:54.500 --> 07:02.980] him of being a no good rotten scoundrel then he got real excited but when you first come
[07:02.980 --> 07:09.380] before the jury, it is not the place to argue your case.
[07:09.380 --> 07:16.980] Now you can give a synopsis of the case, basically you're telling the jury what you're going
[07:16.980 --> 07:22.660] to tell them when you get to trial, this is what the case is about but you can't go into
[07:22.660 --> 07:27.980] the facts of the case or you'll have the judge in the prosecutor hammering on your big time.
[07:27.980 --> 07:34.100] Okay, now we're going to go to opening statement.
[07:34.100 --> 07:39.940] The prosecutor's opening statement should be confined to a statement of the issues in
[07:39.940 --> 07:46.660] the case and the evidence the prosecutor intends to offer which the prosecutor believes in
[07:46.660 --> 07:49.820] good faith will be available and admissible.
[07:49.820 --> 07:57.020] A prosecutor should not allude to any evidence unless there is a good faith in reasonable
[07:57.020 --> 08:05.780] basis for believing that such evidence will be tendered and admitted in evidence.
[08:05.780 --> 08:15.140] Presentation of evidence, this one is a little bit bigger and this one I don't have the actual
[08:15.140 --> 08:21.980] statements so I'll read this one, I'll read a lot of them justice questions.
[08:21.980 --> 08:29.100] Should the prosecutor knowingly offer false evidence, whether by documents, tangible evidence
[08:29.100 --> 08:41.580] or the testimony of witnesses or fail to seek withdrawal thereof upon discovery of its falsity?
[08:41.580 --> 08:44.540] I guess I need to explain the way I have these done.
[08:44.540 --> 08:52.660] I have produced the standards and forms of questions and sometimes because this is not
[08:52.660 --> 08:58.460] completed yet I don't have both the questions and the actual statutes.
[08:58.460 --> 09:01.700] So sometimes I read them they sound a little different.
[09:01.700 --> 09:08.140] Okay, but I think I'm okay with this one.
[09:08.140 --> 09:13.540] Presentation of evidence be a prosecutor should not knowingly and for the purpose of bringing
[09:13.540 --> 09:21.700] an inadmissible matter to the attention of the judge or jury offer inadmissible evidence.
[09:21.700 --> 09:28.380] Ask legally objectionable questions or make other impermissible comments or arguments
[09:28.380 --> 09:34.180] in the presence of the judge or a jury.
[09:34.180 --> 09:39.860] A prosecutor should not permit any tangible evidence to be displayed in the view of the
[09:39.860 --> 09:46.700] judge or jury which would tend to prejudice fair consideration by the judge or jury until
[09:46.700 --> 09:52.100] such time as a good faith tender of such evidence is made.
[09:52.100 --> 09:58.780] For those of you who don't know what that means, that means that you before you present
[09:58.780 --> 10:06.100] evidence you must establish foundation for the presentation of the evidence.
[10:06.100 --> 10:12.180] And when you put in the prosecutor gets the officer on the stand he will ask him a lot
[10:12.180 --> 10:16.620] of questions that seem preparatory.
[10:16.620 --> 10:19.260] Are you a police officer?
[10:19.260 --> 10:21.620] Were you working that day?
[10:21.620 --> 10:28.820] He does primarily what he's doing is establishing foundation.
[10:28.820 --> 10:35.740] He's establishing that the officer was where he said he was was doing what he said he was
[10:35.740 --> 10:36.740] doing.
[10:36.740 --> 10:43.580] Has the training to be able to make the observations he's going to make, this is all establishing
[10:43.580 --> 10:44.580] foundation.
[10:44.580 --> 10:47.300] You can't just bring a piece of evidence in the court.
[10:47.300 --> 10:55.860] You first have to ask some questions of some witnesses that show why that evidence is relevant
[10:55.860 --> 11:03.620] before you can bring it in and that's what this one particular one went to.
[11:03.620 --> 11:09.780] One more, a prosecutor should not tender tangible evidence in the view of the judge or jury
[11:09.780 --> 11:16.140] if it would tend to prejudice fair consideration by the judge or jury unless there is a reasonable
[11:16.140 --> 11:20.940] basis for its admission in evidence.
[11:20.940 --> 11:26.940] When there is any substantial doubt about the admissibility of such evidence it should
[11:26.940 --> 11:33.820] be tendered by an offer of proof and a ruling obtained and this before the jury gets the
[11:33.820 --> 11:37.460] opportunity to see it.
[11:37.460 --> 11:41.860] Examination of witnesses.
[11:41.860 --> 11:47.540] The interrogation of all witnesses should be conducted fairly, objectively and with
[11:47.540 --> 11:53.900] due regard for the dignity and legitimate privacy of the witness and without seeking
[11:53.900 --> 11:58.740] to intimidate or humiliate the witness unnecessarily.
[11:58.740 --> 12:04.940] The prosecutor's belief that the witness is telling the truth does not preclude cross-examination
[12:04.940 --> 12:08.700] but may affect the method and scope of cross-examination.
[12:08.700 --> 12:15.900] A prosecutor should not use the power of cross-examination to discredit or undermine a witness if the
[12:15.900 --> 12:24.380] prosecutor knows the witness is testifying truthfully.
[12:24.380 --> 12:29.620] A prosecutor should not call a witness in the presence of the jury who the prosecutor
[12:29.620 --> 12:36.580] knows will claim a valid privilege.
[12:36.580 --> 12:44.540] A prosecutor should not ask a question which implies the existence of a factual predicate
[12:44.540 --> 12:52.220] for which a good faith belief is lacking.
[12:52.220 --> 12:53.720] That one will take some explaining.
[12:53.720 --> 12:56.580] I'll have to do some research on that one.
[12:56.580 --> 12:58.260] I kind of understand it.
[12:58.260 --> 12:59.660] Oh, Nolo Proesky.
[12:59.660 --> 13:03.820] We got that handle.
[13:03.820 --> 13:05.620] Okay, Ramon did that on the air.
[13:05.620 --> 13:06.620] Good.
[13:06.620 --> 13:09.020] So I'm kind of losing track of where I'm at here.
[13:09.020 --> 13:10.020] Okay.
[13:10.020 --> 13:15.460] Let's do argument to the jury.
[13:15.460 --> 13:28.620] Okay, see, in closing argument to the jury, the prosecutor may argue all reasonable inferences
[13:28.620 --> 13:31.060] from evidence in the record.
[13:31.060 --> 13:38.660] The prosecutor should not intentionally mistake, misstate the evidence or mislead the jury
[13:38.660 --> 13:43.180] as to the inferences it may draw.
[13:43.180 --> 13:54.500] And these last few go to the defendant as well as the prosecutor.
[13:54.500 --> 13:59.980] The prosecutor should not express his or her personal belief or opinion as to the truth
[13:59.980 --> 14:06.180] or falsity of any testimony or evidence or the guilt of the defendant.
[14:06.180 --> 14:10.260] And that they almost always do.
[14:10.260 --> 14:17.860] The prosecutor should not make arguments calculated to appeal to the prejudices of the jury.
[14:17.860 --> 14:23.260] And the prosecutor should refrain from argument which would divert the jury from its duty
[14:23.260 --> 14:28.580] to decide the case on the evidence.
[14:28.580 --> 14:34.180] Now facts outside the record.
[14:34.180 --> 14:40.980] The prosecutor should not intentionally refer to or argue on the basis of facts outside
[14:40.980 --> 14:47.300] the record, whether at trial or on appeal, unless such facts are matters of common public
[14:47.300 --> 14:53.580] knowledge based on ordinary human experience or matters of which the court may take judicial
[14:53.580 --> 14:54.580] notice.
[14:54.580 --> 15:02.860] Those things for which the court may take judicial notice are things which cannot be
[15:02.860 --> 15:06.500] refuted or argued against.
[15:06.500 --> 15:11.380] They're absolutely established facts.
[15:11.380 --> 15:15.380] Okay, last section.
[15:15.380 --> 15:17.140] Sentencing.
[15:17.140 --> 15:21.140] And it's relatively short, I think.
[15:21.140 --> 15:24.180] Sorry about the delay.
[15:24.180 --> 15:26.900] I have no trouble bringing up the page.
[15:26.900 --> 15:31.100] There we go.
[15:31.100 --> 15:37.620] The prosecutor should not make the severity of sentences the index of his or her effectiveness.
[15:37.620 --> 15:42.620] To the extent the prosecutor becomes involved in the sentencing process, he or she should
[15:42.620 --> 15:49.820] seek to assure that a fair and informed judgment is made on the sentence to avoid unfair sentence
[15:49.820 --> 15:52.180] disparities.
[15:52.180 --> 15:57.020] Where sentence is fixed by the jury, the prosecutor should present evidence on the issue within
[15:57.020 --> 16:02.220] the limits permitted in the jurisdiction, but the prosecutor should avoid introducing
[16:02.220 --> 16:09.300] evidence bearing on sentence which will prejudice the jury's determination of the issue of guilt.
[16:09.300 --> 16:13.940] We are almost finished, but we are out of time here.
[16:13.940 --> 16:17.500] I have one more I might get it in.
[16:17.500 --> 16:22.700] The prosecutor should assist the court in basing its sentence on a complete and accurate
[16:22.700 --> 16:28.780] information for use in the present pre-sentence report.
[16:28.780 --> 16:33.860] The prosecutor, okay, there's only one left.
[16:33.860 --> 16:36.340] We'll pick that up on the other side.
[16:36.340 --> 16:37.340] Now let me finish it.
[16:37.340 --> 16:42.980] The prosecutor should disclose to the defense and to the court at or prior to sentencing
[16:42.980 --> 16:47.660] proceedings all on privilege mitigating information known to the prosecutor.
[16:47.660 --> 16:54.660] Randy Kelton, Deborah Stephens, rule of law radio, we'll be right back.
[17:17.660 --> 17:45.740] Order beyond Tangy Tangerine and other great young Jebedee products at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[17:45.740 --> 17:47.740] by clicking on the Tangy Tangerine banner.
[17:47.740 --> 17:53.260] Sign up as a preferred customer for wholesale prices or become a distributor and support
[17:53.260 --> 17:54.260] LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[17:54.260 --> 17:55.260] So what do you say, Elvis?
[17:55.260 --> 17:56.260] Hi.
[17:56.260 --> 17:57.260] Hi, Laura Mosh.
[17:57.260 --> 18:05.260] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:05.260 --> 18:08.820] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Maris proven method.
[18:08.820 --> 18:13.140] Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.140 --> 18:14.140] can win two.
[18:14.140 --> 18:18.980] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:18.980 --> 18:24.740] civil rights statute, what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer
[18:24.740 --> 18:29.380] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[18:29.380 --> 18:33.580] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.580 --> 18:38.700] The Michael Maris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.700 --> 18:40.820] Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.820 --> 18:46.380] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner
[18:46.380 --> 18:49.380] or email Michael Maris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.380 --> 18:58.940] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[18:58.940 --> 18:59.940] now.
[18:59.940 --> 19:12.820] If you are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradio-network.com, well don't let nothing
[19:12.820 --> 19:13.820] get to you.
[19:13.820 --> 19:21.020] Only the father can do it by you, but don't let bad-mine people hurt you until they can
[19:21.020 --> 19:22.020] get behind you.
[19:22.020 --> 19:32.020] No I mean, my friend, my law judge should come and show steam behind me free, tellin'
[19:32.020 --> 19:39.700] me a problem babe, callin' his name once again, hearin' all you know he won't stay in,
[19:39.700 --> 19:51.420] he on big king marise and everything, use everything to me bas poor my car.
[19:51.420 --> 19:52.760] Okay, we are back.
[19:52.760 --> 20:01.880] Randy Kelton there Steve then ruleoflawradio.
[20:01.880 --> 20:09.520] And there is a section right at the beginning that I went over yesterda and I didn't go
[20:09.520 --> 20:15.440] over today. And I'd like to go to that because there were some really interesting things
[20:15.440 --> 20:26.520] there. And the 3-1.2 right at the beginning, the function of the prosecutor. Oh no, I did
[20:26.520 --> 20:33.920] that. I'm sorry. There's one I've missed here. There was one that I don't remember seeing
[20:33.920 --> 20:49.440] it that requires that the prosecutor keep a set of rules, a rule book. And I've asked
[20:49.440 --> 20:56.600] a number of prosecutors for that and they always say they don't have it. So if I've
[20:56.600 --> 21:01.120] been over this before, I guess I went over some meaning I'm kind of getting brain dead.
[21:01.120 --> 21:07.080] But let me go back over this again. Do you respond to misconduct in the prosecutor? Let
[21:07.080 --> 21:12.640] me see. Where a prosecutor knows that another person associated with the prosecutor's office
[21:12.640 --> 21:18.920] is engaged in action and tends to act or refuses to act in a manner that is a violation of
[21:18.920 --> 21:24.400] legal obligation to the prosecutor's office or a violation of law. The prosecutor should
[21:24.400 --> 21:29.800] follow the policies of the prosecutor's office concerning such matters. If such policies
[21:29.800 --> 21:35.800] are unavailing or available and do not exist, the prosecutor should ask the person to reconsider
[21:35.800 --> 21:42.400] the action or inaction, which is that if you issue, if such a request is aptly timed to
[21:42.400 --> 21:49.320] prevent such misconduct, then is otherwise feasible. If such a request for reconsideration
[21:49.320 --> 21:55.840] is unavailable, inapt or otherwise not feasible, or if the seriousness of the matter so requires,
[21:55.840 --> 22:00.560] the prosecutor should refer the matter to higher authority in the prosecutor's office,
[22:00.560 --> 22:05.840] including if warranted by the seriousness of the matter, referral to the chief prosecutor.
[22:05.840 --> 22:14.960] Okay. This sounded redundant because I had already read something very similar in the
[22:14.960 --> 22:20.720] judicial canons. And when I read it in the judicial canons, I recognized that it was
[22:20.720 --> 22:31.120] familiar. So I will read this again. It's actually a lot more strict here in the bar
[22:31.120 --> 22:39.040] association standards and the prosecutorial function standards. Okay. If, despite the
[22:39.040 --> 22:45.960] prosecutor's efforts in accordance with Section A, the chief prosecutor insists upon action
[22:45.960 --> 22:51.280] or a refusal to act that is clearly a violation of law, the prosecutor may take further remedial
[22:51.280 --> 22:57.760] action, including revealing the information necessary to remedy this violation to other
[22:57.760 --> 23:06.400] appropriate government officials, not in the prosecutor's office. This is really important
[23:06.400 --> 23:17.160] because if the prosecutor fails to perform a duty, we can not only grieve the prosecutor
[23:17.160 --> 23:24.080] that took the action or failed to take the action, we can grieve every other prosecutor
[23:24.080 --> 23:34.240] in the office for not telling on him. And grievances against prosecutors does cause them
[23:34.240 --> 23:41.640] a big problem. Right now, all of the prosecutors working for the Travis County Prosecutor's
[23:41.640 --> 23:51.160] Office expect to have their job for four years max. If another prosecutor and if another
[23:51.160 --> 23:57.400] district attorney gets elected, these guys can expect to hit the highway. And when that
[23:57.400 --> 24:03.760] happens, they're back in private practice. And if they have been pounded with bar grievances,
[24:03.760 --> 24:09.960] they are not going to get picked up by a law firm. And because if they did, the law firm
[24:09.960 --> 24:15.560] would get their malpractice insurance canceled. And they're not going to be able to get malpractice
[24:15.560 --> 24:23.000] insurance themselves. So it puts them in a very bad position. Let me go up to the top.
[24:23.000 --> 24:29.680] I don't think I've went over these. These are similar to some of the judicial cannons.
[24:29.680 --> 24:35.160] The function of the prosecutor, the office of the prosecutor's charge, the responsibility
[24:35.160 --> 24:42.800] for prosecution in its jurisdiction. The prosecutor is an administrator of justice,
[24:42.800 --> 24:49.280] an advocate, and an officer of the court. The prosecutor must exercise sound discretion
[24:49.280 --> 24:57.280] in the performance of his or her actions. The duty of the prosecutor is to seek justice,
[24:57.280 --> 25:03.560] not merely to convict. And that goes to 2.01 code criminal procedure, shall be the primary
[25:03.560 --> 25:11.400] duty of the prosecuting attorney, not to secure conviction, but to ensure that justice is
[25:11.400 --> 25:16.720] served. He shall not seek witnesses or evidence that may show the innocence of the accused
[25:16.720 --> 25:23.640] or mitigate the guilt of the accused. And that should sound familiar from 3-3.11.
[25:23.640 --> 25:29.960] The function of the prosecutor, it is an important function of the prosecutor to seek to reform
[25:29.960 --> 25:36.920] and improve the administration of criminal justice. When inadequacies or injustices in
[25:36.920 --> 25:43.000] the substantive or procedural law come to the prosecutor's attention, he or she should
[25:43.000 --> 25:51.960] simulate efforts for remedial action. It is the duty of the prosecutor to know and be
[25:51.960 --> 25:58.480] guided by the standards of professional conduct as defined by applicable professional traditions,
[25:58.480 --> 26:04.440] ethical codes, and law in the prosecutor's jurisdiction. The prosecutor should make use
[26:04.440 --> 26:17.920] of guidelines afforded by an advisory council of the kind described in standard 4-1.5.
[26:17.920 --> 26:26.080] Interests of interest. A prosecutor should avoid a conflict of interest or suspect to
[26:26.080 --> 26:31.720] his or her office. A prosecutor should not represent a defendant in criminal proceedings
[26:31.720 --> 26:39.040] in a jurisdiction where he or she is also employed as a prosecutor. A prosecutor should
[26:39.040 --> 26:47.040] not expect as, accept as law may otherwise expressly permit, participate in a matter
[26:47.040 --> 26:53.400] in which she or she participated personally or substantially while in private practice
[26:53.400 --> 27:01.280] or non-governmental employment unless under the applicable law no one is or by lawful
[27:01.280 --> 27:08.240] delegation may be authorized to act in the prosecutor's stand in the matter. A prosecutor
[27:08.240 --> 27:14.400] who has formally represented a client in a matter in private practice should not thereafter
[27:14.400 --> 27:19.520] use information obtained from that representation to the disadvantage of the former client unless
[27:19.520 --> 27:26.480] the rules of attorney-client confidentiality do not apply to the information has become
[27:26.480 --> 27:34.160] generally or the information has become generally well known. A prosecutor should not accept
[27:34.160 --> 27:39.760] as the law may otherwise expressly permit, negotiate for private employment with any
[27:39.760 --> 27:47.600] person who is involved as an accused or as an attorney or agent for an accused in a matter
[27:47.600 --> 27:56.560] in which the prosecutor is participating personally and substantially. A prosecutor should not
[27:56.560 --> 28:03.200] permit his or her professional judgment or obligations to be affected by his or her political,
[28:03.200 --> 28:11.520] financial business property or personal interests. A prosecutor who is related to another lawyer
[28:11.520 --> 28:16.800] as parent, child, sibling or spouse should not participate in the prosecution of a person
[28:16.800 --> 28:24.400] who the prosecutor knows is represented by the other lawyer nor should a prosecutor who has
[28:24.400 --> 28:29.840] a significant personal or financial relationship with another lawyer participating the prosecution
[28:29.840 --> 28:36.080] of a person who the prosecutor knows is represented by the other lawyer unless the prosecutor's
[28:36.080 --> 28:42.880] supervisor if any is informed and approves or unless there is no other prosecutor authorized
[28:42.880 --> 28:51.680] to act in the prosecutor's stead. And you could always petition to appoint one an attorney pro
[28:51.680 --> 28:59.200] Tim. A prosecutor should not recommend the services of particular defense counsel to accused persons
[28:59.200 --> 29:05.600] or witnesses unless requested by the accused person or witness to make such a recommendation
[29:06.160 --> 29:11.360] and should not make referral that is likely to create a conflict of interest nor should the
[29:11.360 --> 29:17.280] prosecutor comment upon the reputation or abilities of defense counsel to an accused person or
[29:17.280 --> 29:24.240] witness who is seeking or may seek such counsel services unless requested by such a person.
[29:24.240 --> 29:32.000] I think that is it for the standards we have been through most of them so
[29:32.800 --> 29:37.680] for everybody listening you've pretty well heard all of the standards you don't have to have them
[29:37.680 --> 29:45.680] memorized you don't have to worry about whether you know them or not you have heard them and if
[29:45.680 --> 29:54.080] you listen to this archive and maybe one other time then if a lawyer does something inappropriate
[29:54.080 --> 29:57.680] you will know immediately then you can come back and find it we'll be right back.
[29:59.920 --> 30:05.520] Eyes may soon be windows to more than our souls if a government test of iris scanning expands
[30:05.520 --> 30:09.600] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment to share more on how this tracking
[30:09.600 --> 30:15.440] technology could undermine your civil liberties. Your search engine is watching you recording
[30:15.440 --> 30:21.280] all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information that's creepy but it
[30:21.280 --> 30:26.640] doesn't have to be that way. Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. Startpage
[30:26.640 --> 30:31.360] doesn't store your IP address make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies and their
[30:31.360 --> 30:36.960] third party certified if you don't like big brother spying on you start over with Startpage
[30:36.960 --> 30:43.440] great search results and total privacy. Startpage.com the world's most private search engine. The eyes
[30:43.440 --> 30:48.640] have it a unique iris pattern that is and the US Department of Homeland Security is testing those
[30:48.640 --> 30:53.600] patterns to identify and track people at the US border in McAllen, Texas. While the government's
[30:53.600 --> 30:58.480] current agenda is citizen safety, tracking technology actually makes us much less safe in
[30:58.480 --> 31:03.680] the long run. Researchers have found a way to secretly scan people's irises from across a room
[31:03.680 --> 31:08.240] and once the government can track people it can control them too hushing dissent and undermining
[31:08.240 --> 31:13.040] civil liberties. We ignore these tracking technologies at our peril unless we speak out
[31:13.040 --> 31:18.000] today's scanning of aliens at the border will work its way deep into our communities tomorrow.
[31:18.000 --> 31:24.240] Minority Report Style. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[31:30.240 --> 31:35.840] This is building seven a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The
[31:35.840 --> 31:41.360] government says that fire brought it down however 1500 architects and engineers have concluded it
[31:41.360 --> 31:45.760] was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives and
[31:45.760 --> 31:50.320] thousands of my fellow first responders have blamed. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural
[31:50.320 --> 31:54.480] engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his
[31:54.480 --> 32:00.080] son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:00.960 --> 32:06.720] It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM but finding things on the internet isn't so easy
[32:06.720 --> 32:11.200] and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with. Oh well I guess you haven't heard of
[32:11.200 --> 32:17.040] Brave New Books then. Brave New Books? Yes Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking
[32:17.040 --> 32:22.240] for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul and G. Edward Griffin. They even stock inner food,
[32:22.240 --> 32:28.080] Berkey products and Calvin Soaps. There's no way a place like that exists. Go check it out for
[32:28.080 --> 32:35.200] yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street just south of UT. Oh by UT? There's never anywhere
[32:35.200 --> 32:40.320] to park down there. Actually they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the
[32:40.320 --> 32:48.080] 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore. It does exist but when are they open? Monday
[32:48.080 --> 32:56.240] through Saturday 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays so give them a call at 512-480-2503
[32:56.240 --> 33:12.160] or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com. Live free speech radio logosradionetwork.com
[33:26.240 --> 33:52.880] Okay, Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, rule of law radio.
[33:52.880 --> 34:03.920] I wanted to go through all of that and I will do that again. The American Bar Association
[34:03.920 --> 34:15.120] Standards Standards of the Projectual Function, the Federal Rules of Judicial Conduct and then
[34:15.120 --> 34:24.000] I'll do the state. I want to do those so that we have them as archives. So a lot of people
[34:24.000 --> 34:32.080] aren't good at reading these things and it's good to hear them a couple of times. The first
[34:32.080 --> 34:35.920] time I go through them, you know, some of them sound interesting, some of them don't sound
[34:35.920 --> 34:46.000] interesting. The second time you listen to it, you begin to make connections. Go to one and you'll
[34:46.000 --> 34:52.080] remember having heard it before. After you've listened to this a couple of times, you get into
[34:52.080 --> 34:57.760] a courtroom and you're going to know immediately if the lawyer has breached a can of each day
[34:57.760 --> 35:05.040] standard and we hope soon to have a checklist built up that you can take with you so you can
[35:05.040 --> 35:11.440] as you go through the trial and check, check, the lawyer can do something, you can ask the court.
[35:11.440 --> 35:14.640] Just the moment you're honoring, you go over and check and he's going to ask you what you're
[35:14.640 --> 35:23.680] doing. Oh, your honor, this is my Bar Grievance checklist. That will tense them up. Anyway,
[35:23.680 --> 35:31.600] okay, we have a caller. We're going to go to Chris in Texas. Okay, Chris, I understand you had fun
[35:31.600 --> 35:41.760] in games and court this morning. I sure did. Yeah, I had an 830 court hearing this morning
[35:42.800 --> 35:47.600] and lo and behold, it is for a littering ticket of five pounds or less.
[35:49.520 --> 35:57.760] And it was funny because after staying up till 5.30 this morning, did a lot of research,
[35:57.760 --> 36:06.240] it turns out that the police officer put down a statute that doesn't even exist.
[36:07.760 --> 36:18.000] So when I get up in front of the judge, she turns on the paper I was sent, it said it was a
[36:18.000 --> 36:27.760] notice or a notice to set jury hearing. And I didn't know what that was. When I got there,
[36:28.480 --> 36:33.280] really what it was was, hey, we're going to go back and do that arraignment we should have done
[36:33.280 --> 36:41.840] a long time ago. And so she gets me up there, she reads off the charge, says, how do you plead,
[36:41.840 --> 36:47.920] guilty, not guilty, or no contest. And I said, well, at this time, I'm unable to make a plea
[36:47.920 --> 36:57.600] because, one, I want to motion to dismiss for the fact that there's an impurable defect on the
[36:57.600 --> 37:08.720] citation itself. And what else? I've totored several things before she said, okay, well,
[37:08.720 --> 37:13.760] I'm just going to go ahead and enter a plea of not guilty for you. And I immediately said,
[37:13.760 --> 37:22.240] I object, Your Honor, I would like that plea stricken from the record as unless you are
[37:22.960 --> 37:29.440] agreeing to represent me in this hearing. And she said, another word out of you and
[37:29.440 --> 37:40.240] you'll be leaving this courtroom in handcuffs. And at that point, I turned around to walk back
[37:40.240 --> 37:50.480] out into the gallery and realized that there had, there had been a group of 10 police officers come
[37:50.480 --> 38:20.000] but there were a group of 10 police officers that had gathered around me. And I was just,
[38:20.000 --> 38:26.160] I was blown away by the fact that they brought in all these different police officers,
[38:27.520 --> 38:31.200] just for little old me, you know, they brought in these 10 police officers,
[38:31.840 --> 38:42.080] like I was this victim criminal. So I go back out into the gallery and they always
[38:42.080 --> 38:50.240] these officers leave. And when they call me back up, it was about an hour and 45 minutes later,
[38:50.800 --> 38:58.640] I'm sorry, let me, I need a backtrack. The prosecutor comes over and talks to me and says,
[38:59.520 --> 39:08.160] is there any way we can just wrap this up today? And, you know, lower the fine. And you just,
[39:08.160 --> 39:14.480] you know, make a plea bargain and it's nothing that goes on your record. And I said, absolutely
[39:14.480 --> 39:19.920] not. And he says, he said, well, then you're prepared to go to trial today. And I said,
[39:19.920 --> 39:26.000] absolutely not. And he says, well, what do you plan on doing? And I said, I plan to ask for a
[39:26.000 --> 39:32.080] motion to continue in order to prepare for trial. And he says, well, what is it you need to prepare
[39:32.080 --> 39:38.320] for? And I said, well, first off, we haven't had discovery. And there's not been a pretrial.
[39:39.360 --> 39:42.880] And he said, well, what is it you're looking for in discovery anyway?
[39:43.760 --> 39:49.840] And I said, well, the first thing I want to see is what evidence is the police officer relying on
[39:51.360 --> 40:00.080] in order to claim that I littered anywhere? And he says, he says, well, what else is it
[40:00.080 --> 40:06.960] you're looking for in discovery? And I said, at the time I file my motion, you'll be able to read it.
[40:08.480 --> 40:13.200] And at that point, he said, well, I'm going to go up here and talk to the judge. And he'll be able
[40:13.200 --> 40:20.720] to come up, you'll be able to come up here and enter your motion for a continuance at that point.
[40:21.760 --> 40:28.880] So before they called me up there, the same 10 officers came into the courtroom,
[40:28.880 --> 40:33.440] gathered around the judge up there. And then they called the judge called me up.
[40:34.400 --> 40:41.600] And we went through the whole motion to continue. And she told me that I was lucky that the law
[40:44.240 --> 40:48.480] said that I was entitled to a continuance. And
[40:48.480 --> 40:58.320] really, have I got you here? Yeah, I'm here. Okay, I just, I mean, sure.
[40:59.280 --> 41:06.800] I'm muted because I'm getting some background noise. Oh, okay. But she told me I was lucky
[41:06.800 --> 41:12.560] that the law permitted that and that she would allow the continuance. And when I turned around
[41:12.560 --> 41:19.600] to walk away from that bench, there were eight more officers standing in the, in the gallery,
[41:21.200 --> 41:27.680] plus the 10 that had crowded around her bench. And I just thought, really, it takes 18,
[41:27.680 --> 41:34.720] 18 officers for a guy that has already been through the mental detectors. You know, he's not armed.
[41:34.720 --> 41:46.560] Okay, I, I, I dropped off and missed the first part of that. Why did you get the 10 officers
[41:47.280 --> 41:54.560] in the first place? Because when I was up in front of her, and I asked her,
[41:55.360 --> 42:01.360] I said objection to her. She had said, I'm going to enter a plea of not guilty for you.
[42:01.360 --> 42:08.400] And I immediately said, I object. I, I motion or I said, I moved to have that
[42:09.200 --> 42:15.040] plea stricken from the record as you do not, you're not my attorney. And unless you're,
[42:15.680 --> 42:23.120] you know, acting as my attorney, you know, you're not able and she cut me off and she said one
[42:23.120 --> 42:29.360] more word out of you and he'll leave this courtroom in handcuffs. Okay, that's enough.
[42:29.360 --> 42:35.600] Move for just moved to disqualify the judge. She brought in 10 officers. I would file official
[42:35.600 --> 42:42.480] oppression against her. She brought in 10 officers to prevent you from raising objections
[42:43.600 --> 42:50.240] and putting objections on the record. Introduce her to the deep end of the pool.
[42:50.240 --> 42:57.760] And I don't know how much it helps, but I got it all on audio recording.
[42:58.320 --> 43:07.520] Oh, wonderful. That'll help. Tremendous. One thing you need to do is go back and put in,
[43:07.520 --> 43:13.760] when you do the discovery, put in a request for the names of all 18 officers that were in the
[43:13.760 --> 43:23.440] courtroom that day, but in a motion to disqualify the judge for cause, official oppression,
[43:24.000 --> 43:34.320] accusation against the judge and grieve the attorney for not objecting himself to the improper
[43:34.320 --> 43:42.080] practices. Hang on. This is too much fun. This is Randy Kelton, Davis Stevens, Lula
[43:42.080 --> 43:51.520] Radio, our call in number 512-646-1984. Give us a call. We've got an hour left. We'll be right back
[43:51.520 --> 44:04.000] on the other side. It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the
[44:04.000 --> 44:09.040] Internet isn't so easy and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with. Oh, well,
[44:09.040 --> 44:14.480] I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then. Brave New Books? Yes. Brave New Books has all
[44:14.480 --> 44:19.760] the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[44:19.760 --> 44:25.520] They even stock Interfood, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps. There's no way a place like that
[44:25.520 --> 44:31.360] exists. Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[44:31.920 --> 44:37.840] By UT? There's never anywhere to park down there. Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking
[44:37.840 --> 44:45.120] for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore. It does exist,
[44:45.120 --> 44:51.200] but when are they open? Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[44:51.200 --> 44:58.080] So give them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[45:00.480 --> 45:05.360] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[45:05.360 --> 45:12.560] with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24
[45:12.560 --> 45:19.360] hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have
[45:19.360 --> 45:25.440] a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course,
[45:25.440 --> 45:32.640] and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning
[45:32.640 --> 45:38.400] experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:38.400 --> 45:44.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio
[45:44.000 --> 45:51.680] classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[45:51.680 --> 46:03.200] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:22.480 --> 46:32.880] Yeah, always I must be careful what I'm wishing for. When I'm hungry, I like to know just what
[46:32.880 --> 46:42.640] I'm wishing for. I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton. I'm just here making my
[46:42.640 --> 46:52.160] living pushing buttons. I get my message out to anyone in the shot and distance.
[46:52.160 --> 46:56.400] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, David Stevens, rule of our radio,
[46:58.000 --> 47:05.600] and we're talking to Chris in Texas, and you were going to tell us about the other judge coming yet.
[47:05.600 --> 47:13.280] Chris, did you drop the mic?
[47:14.000 --> 47:18.160] No, there we are. Sorry, I couldn't hear you there for a second.
[47:21.360 --> 47:26.320] Yeah, what I was going to tell you before we went to break is
[47:26.320 --> 47:36.480] at the point where I was up there motioning to continue, the judge that is supposed to be the judge
[47:37.120 --> 47:44.000] in my subject matter jurisdiction hearing came into the courtroom and heard the judge that was
[47:44.000 --> 47:51.760] up there today. I don't know her name, but that judge and Judge Bradshaw had a little sidebar
[47:51.760 --> 47:59.440] and then she came back and that's when she finished hearing my motion to continue
[48:00.240 --> 48:04.240] and he stood right there beside her while she did this whole thing.
[48:07.440 --> 48:11.760] Now, this is a municipal court? Yes, this is a municipal court.
[48:11.760 --> 48:22.320] Where at? Charrant County. Fort Worth? Yes. Oh, good, good, good. So he's probably training
[48:22.320 --> 48:30.560] this judge. If it's a municipal judge, she's got a bar card. She's very vulnerable. So
[48:31.760 --> 48:36.480] you go after with judicial conduct complaints, criminal complaint for impersonating a judicial
[48:36.480 --> 48:46.800] officer and a bar complaint. This will welcome her to the deep into the pool. Oh, yeah, yeah.
[48:47.520 --> 48:54.320] So the criminal will really get her excited. We could have a whole crowd going down to the grand
[48:54.320 --> 49:03.520] jury there in Charrant County here pretty soon. Well, I'm on board for being in that crowd because
[49:03.520 --> 49:09.840] I mean, she wasn't playing around when she said that's why I didn't say another word was because
[49:10.640 --> 49:17.120] it was really threatened by, you know, I turn around and there's 10, 10 deputies standing
[49:17.120 --> 49:23.600] around me and they've got me pretty much cornered in and boxed in up there at her bench.
[49:26.720 --> 49:29.440] I think that would have been a time I would leave the courtroom.
[49:29.440 --> 49:35.280] And the one of, let me tell you, one of the bailiffs that was in there today,
[49:35.920 --> 49:45.600] he's about six, five, six, six, ball headed bailiff. And I have him on recording telling me
[49:45.600 --> 49:50.880] after I was leaving court five down there one day as he walked me out of the courtroom
[49:50.880 --> 50:02.560] that he said, and I quote, if I ever get a reason to arrest you, I will.
[50:04.720 --> 50:12.720] I went right back to the judge, a ball headed bailiff. I had an experience with a ball headed
[50:12.720 --> 50:19.600] bailiff down there at Charrant County. They were having, I was waiting for somebody to get bailed
[50:19.600 --> 50:23.680] out and so they were having hearings. So I went and sat out in the courtroom
[50:25.680 --> 50:28.960] and the bailiff come over and said, can I help you? And I said, no.
[50:29.840 --> 50:35.280] And just, I was writing and I just kept writing. He said, who are you? I said, I'm Randall Kelton.
[50:35.280 --> 50:39.600] He said, what are you doing in this courtroom? I said, get lost. I want to know what you're
[50:39.600 --> 50:45.200] doing in this courtroom. And I stood up in the courtroom and hollered out your honor, your honor.
[50:45.200 --> 50:51.120] And the judge was startled and he looked up and he said, well, what is going on? Your honor,
[50:51.120 --> 50:57.200] can you pull your bulldog off of me? And this guy liked to have got apoplexy.
[50:58.480 --> 51:02.240] The bailiff, he really got excited and the judge said, well, what is going on?
[51:03.280 --> 51:05.760] Your honor, he won't tell me what his business here is today.
[51:06.320 --> 51:09.760] And the judge looked at me and said, well, who are you? I said, I'm Randall Kelton.
[51:09.760 --> 51:16.080] Do you mind if I ask why you're in my, he said, do you have an issue before this court? Oh,
[51:16.080 --> 51:24.640] no, your honor. Do you mind if I ask why you're in my courtroom? Now, he did that right. And I said,
[51:24.640 --> 51:33.760] oh, I don't mind to ask. Why are you in my courtroom? Entertainment? Oh, okay, bailiff,
[51:33.760 --> 51:42.080] leave him alone. They sat back down and they went on with their earring. But his head looked like a
[51:42.080 --> 51:49.760] chrome dome. So we may know the same one. If a bailiff said that to me, I would be right back
[51:49.760 --> 51:56.000] to the judge instantly. Demand that the judge arrest him for official oppression.
[51:56.000 --> 52:10.640] We're breaking from sucking eggs. Okay. Oh, hold on. There we go. There you are. You're back.
[52:10.640 --> 52:19.440] I'm sorry. You were muted and I don't know why. Are you back? Yeah, I'm back. Okay. I didn't,
[52:19.440 --> 52:23.360] I don't remember. I didn't mute you, but you somehow when we came back from break,
[52:23.360 --> 52:29.040] it must have muted you. Yeah, I was saying that the time that we do know the same guy
[52:30.160 --> 52:34.960] was years like six, things like six, five, six, six, maybe even six, seven.
[52:35.600 --> 52:39.040] Yeah, it's probably not. This was a number of years ago.
[52:41.760 --> 52:47.360] So they may have more than one ball guy with attitude. But I didn't walk back into the judge.
[52:47.360 --> 52:54.000] I did come home and fell out of a criminal complaint against him and meld to the judge down there.
[52:55.120 --> 52:58.640] Wonderful. Wonderful. You did take it and have it.
[53:01.600 --> 53:04.320] You know about taking it to a notary, I think. Yes.
[53:07.600 --> 53:12.960] Okay. Well, that's wonderful. You have another ticket coming up, did you say?
[53:12.960 --> 53:19.280] Yes, I got another one that's on April 2nd, just coming Tuesday, actually,
[53:20.160 --> 53:25.600] that is for what they claim is a no driver's license on person,
[53:27.360 --> 53:33.840] which, well, I've been through the statutes and cannot find this charge as being a valid charge.
[53:33.840 --> 53:41.520] There is one for no driver's license. And when we looked it up last night, the no driver's license
[53:41.520 --> 53:47.280] charge says it's $10 fee or $10 fine for not having your driver's license.
[53:48.480 --> 53:52.880] You know, this is if you don't have your driver's license on you at the time of a stop.
[53:54.560 --> 54:02.240] And it says that it's a $10 fine. Well, on mine, it says that they want $197.
[54:02.240 --> 54:14.080] Oh, that is interesting. That'll give you even more to go after. One of the things I'm trying to
[54:14.080 --> 54:21.760] get constructed is a due process questionnaire for traffic. And I just got a ticket for speeding
[54:23.520 --> 54:28.400] in a little town. It was late at night and I was watching really close because I know
[54:28.400 --> 54:34.480] at 10, 11 o'clock, 12 o'clock at night, I think this is one in the morning, the cops don't have
[54:34.480 --> 54:41.280] anything to do. So they're really looking for a reason to pull you over. And he pulled me over
[54:41.280 --> 54:47.280] anyway. And the guy handled himself well. He didn't lose his cool. And they tend to do that.
[54:47.280 --> 54:53.200] But he handled himself pretty well. But I asked him first thing if he saw that number on the back
[54:53.200 --> 54:59.520] of my car. And he said, Yeah, he saw it. I said, Did you look it up? He said, No, I didn't. Well,
[54:59.520 --> 55:05.520] you might want to do that. And we had a little back and forth and I wouldn't give him my proof of
[55:05.520 --> 55:13.440] insurance. I told him to look it up. And this part I have recorded, I didn't have the first part
[55:13.440 --> 55:24.560] recorded. I asked him if he had the capability of checking insurance from his computer system. Oh,
[55:24.560 --> 55:29.440] no, we just had a new computer put in the car. And I don't have that capability yet.
[55:30.960 --> 55:39.040] Well, when I go down there, Monday, I will put in a request for all maintenance on all
[55:39.040 --> 55:45.360] cruisers for the last two months. I think he lied to me and he lied to me on tape.
[55:46.240 --> 55:51.840] He could have looked it up himself. And that leaves me with no obligation to show it to him.
[55:53.200 --> 55:58.320] And I will charge him with tampering with the government document and couple of God gave a
[55:58.320 --> 56:04.720] whole bunch of stuff. The last time I had a ticket nasal Texas, the clerk I was dealing with when I
[56:04.720 --> 56:17.440] asked the sergeant to arrest her quit immediately. I didn't sign on for this crap. Got up and walked
[56:17.440 --> 56:24.000] off from her desk. So I had a lot of fun with that one. But I'll have more with this one. I'm
[56:24.000 --> 56:30.320] alive. But I want to run this one to get all of the procedures down and I'll build a questionnaire
[56:30.320 --> 56:35.360] where you can go online, fill out the questionnaire, and it'll spit you out the documents you need
[56:36.240 --> 56:45.120] and a lawsuit. The main thing is a lawsuit. Yes, I was going to ask you about the how you go in
[56:45.920 --> 56:52.720] after, I mean, because like, I mean, they, I don't know how or why they decided they need to go back
[56:52.720 --> 57:00.960] and cover the arraignment portion of this whole thing today, because that's not what the summons
[57:00.960 --> 57:11.760] said on it. And they, you know, they backtrack to cover getting an arraignment in. And then, you
[57:11.760 --> 57:16.080] know, this kangaroo style court, you're not even allowed to defend yourself.
[57:16.080 --> 57:24.560] You defend yourself. You're going out of this courtroom in handcuffs. So how do you file the
[57:24.560 --> 57:30.320] actual lawsuit against them? I'm sure you have to wait until it's all over with, right? Oh,
[57:30.320 --> 57:35.520] yeah, with lawsuits filed in a separate court. No, you don't have to wait for anything.
[57:39.920 --> 57:44.560] You can file that immediately. The judge lacks subject matter jurisdiction. There's
[57:44.560 --> 57:51.040] challenge subject matter jurisdiction before the court, and it had not been ruled on. They cannot
[57:51.040 --> 57:59.360] move. She has no jurisdiction. Is that the same as well with the fact that she had no personal
[57:59.360 --> 58:06.400] jurisdiction either? No, it was, she may have, I don't know how she didn't have personal jurisdiction.
[58:06.400 --> 58:14.880] If she was a judge within that jurisdiction, she would have in personum what she wouldn't
[58:14.880 --> 58:22.800] have is subject matter. Okay, okay, hang on. We're about to go to break. This is Randy
[58:22.800 --> 58:28.800] Calton, David Stevens. We will allow radio. Jay, I see you there. We will pick you up when we get
[58:28.800 --> 58:35.920] back on the other side. Our call in number 512-646-1984. Give us a call. We're going into
[58:35.920 --> 58:43.280] our last hour of our four hour info marathon. We'll be right back on the other side.
[58:49.440 --> 58:53.360] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:53.360 --> 58:58.960] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[58:58.960 --> 59:03.760] can really help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study
[59:03.760 --> 59:09.280] Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will
[59:09.280 --> 59:15.280] help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. The free books are a three volume set called
[59:15.280 --> 59:20.720] basic elements of the Christian life. Chapter by chapter, basic elements of the Christian life
[59:20.720 --> 59:27.120] clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church,
[59:27.120 --> 59:32.560] to order your free New Testament recovery version and basic elements of the Christian life.
[59:32.560 --> 59:48.400] Call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:02.880 --> 01:00:09.760] You're listening to the Liberty Bees, your daily source for Liberty News and
[01:00:09.760 --> 01:00:14.240] activist updates online at TheLibertyBeat.com.
[01:00:15.840 --> 01:00:23.520] John Bush here with your Liberty Bees for March 22nd, 2013. Gold open today at $1,609, silver
[01:00:23.520 --> 01:00:31.680] at $28.98.96 and Bitcoin is trading at $72.95. Today's edition of the Liberty Bees is sponsored
[01:00:31.680 --> 01:00:37.040] and part by Brave New Books, your central Texas supplier of One World Way and Tangy Tangerine,
[01:00:37.040 --> 01:00:46.480] online at bravenewbookstore.com. And now the news. A program aimed at rewarding people who
[01:00:46.480 --> 01:00:51.040] blow the whistle on illegal gun owners has yet to show significant results as three police
[01:00:51.040 --> 01:00:57.040] agencies in New York. In February of 2012, 11 months before the passage of NY SAFE Act,
[01:00:57.040 --> 01:01:01.840] Governor Cuomo's office announced a four-pronged initiative to curb gun violence. One of the
[01:01:01.840 --> 01:01:06.160] programs was a cash reward for citizens who lead police to the arrest and confiscation of
[01:01:06.160 --> 01:01:11.520] the legal firearms. Known as the gun tip line, New Yorkers can call a toll-free hotline to alert
[01:01:11.520 --> 01:01:15.840] police if they believe someone they know has an illegal gun. The call would be picked up by
[01:01:15.840 --> 01:01:20.240] state police and local law enforcement would be notified if the tip seemed reliable. If there
[01:01:20.240 --> 01:01:29.920] was an arrest, the tipster would receive as much as $500. The U.S. government is expanding a cyber
[01:01:29.920 --> 01:01:34.800] security program that scans internet traffic headed into and out of defense contractors to
[01:01:34.800 --> 01:01:38.560] include far more of the country's private civilian-run infrastructure. As a result,
[01:01:38.560 --> 01:01:41.920] more private sector employees than ever before, including those at big banks,
[01:01:41.920 --> 01:01:46.240] utilities and key transportation companies, will have their emails and web surfing scanned
[01:01:46.240 --> 01:01:50.800] as a precaution against cyber attacks. Under last month's White House executive order on
[01:01:50.800 --> 01:01:55.280] cybersecurity, the scans will be driven by classified information provided by U.S. intelligence
[01:01:55.280 --> 01:02:00.240] agencies, including data from the National Security Agency on new or specifically serious
[01:02:00.240 --> 01:02:08.960] espionage threats and other hacking attempts. Republican amendments to the Senate's budget
[01:02:08.960 --> 01:02:13.280] proposal would require President Obama and Vice President Biden to get their medical care through
[01:02:13.280 --> 01:02:17.920] the new exchanges created by Obama's signature health care law. Senators Susan Collins,
[01:02:17.920 --> 01:02:22.400] Republican from Maine and Kelly Iote, Republican from New Hampshire, both offered amendments to
[01:02:22.400 --> 01:02:27.360] move the president and vice president into the health care law's exchange. After the Affordable
[01:02:27.360 --> 01:02:32.880] Care Act passed, the White House said Obama would enroll in exchange. Once the time came in 2014,
[01:02:32.880 --> 01:02:37.840] Collins and Iote's amendments would require the president, the vice president, and the cabinet
[01:02:37.840 --> 01:02:44.800] to put their premiums where their politics are. The Liberty Beat is sponsored in part by Pure
[01:02:44.800 --> 01:02:48.800] Rain, chemical and fluoride-free bottled water available at Central Market and Whole Foods
[01:02:48.800 --> 01:02:54.720] grocery stores, online at PureRainUSA.com and by Central Texas Gun Works, self-defense training,
[01:02:54.720 --> 01:03:08.800] CHL courses and firearm sales, online at CentralTexasGunWorks.com.
[01:03:24.720 --> 01:03:52.800] Okay, we are back.
[01:03:52.800 --> 01:04:04.480] We're talking to Chris in Texas. Chris, I understand you have another hearing on Tuesday.
[01:04:04.480 --> 01:04:13.040] I definitely need a witness for that one. If my schedule works out, I was supposed to be in
[01:04:13.040 --> 01:04:24.560] Austin on Tuesday, come to think of it for a hearing, but I would like to be there.
[01:04:24.560 --> 01:04:36.720] Yeah, my hearing on Tuesday is at 9.30 in the morning and I have an open challenge
[01:04:36.720 --> 01:04:46.560] subject matter jurisdiction on this one, too. They scheduled a hearing to proceed with the
[01:04:46.560 --> 01:04:56.080] actual trial on Tuesday, April 2nd. There's never been a subject matter jurisdiction hearing
[01:04:57.280 --> 01:05:00.800] on this one. Oh, wonderful.
[01:05:00.800 --> 01:05:07.680] So, you'll go in and object to it. What is the purpose of the hearing?
[01:05:09.520 --> 01:05:15.520] The purpose of this one is it looks consistent trial.
[01:05:21.680 --> 01:05:24.960] Doesn't it say that on your summons, specifically what it's for?
[01:05:24.960 --> 01:05:33.680] Yeah, it says for the trial. Okay, did you ask for a jury?
[01:05:34.880 --> 01:05:36.320] Yes, I asked for a jury trial.
[01:05:39.280 --> 01:05:44.000] Good. Okay, if I don't go to Austin, I may try to be there.
[01:05:45.520 --> 01:05:46.640] Okay, that'd be awesome.
[01:05:51.280 --> 01:05:53.680] Maybe we can get them excited. You got anything else for us?
[01:05:53.680 --> 01:05:57.440] No, that covers it. My fun for today.
[01:05:59.360 --> 01:06:03.760] Thank you. Now we're going to go to Jay in California.
[01:06:07.280 --> 01:06:08.320] Hey, how's it going?
[01:06:09.280 --> 01:06:18.080] Well, I finally got that for the judge.
[01:06:18.080 --> 01:06:23.680] Okay, wait a minute. We've got a lot of people who don't know what you're talking about. Kind
[01:06:23.680 --> 01:06:26.320] of back up us and bring everybody up to speed.
[01:06:26.320 --> 01:06:32.080] A while back, I was telling you guys that I found out that the judges here in LA County were on the
[01:06:32.080 --> 01:06:43.280] take and I was in a court case back in 2008 where a veterinarian ran a confidence game on me to get
[01:06:43.280 --> 01:06:47.280] my service dogs. They were small service dogs that belonged to my mother and myself.
[01:06:47.280 --> 01:06:53.920] And when she got possession of the service dogs, she then converted them to her name.
[01:06:56.480 --> 01:07:02.160] Long story short side of it is I wrote a contract which said she signed. She said she would not
[01:07:02.160 --> 01:07:07.600] convert the dog. She said she was going to help because I was fighting with the jury and different
[01:07:07.600 --> 01:07:13.920] things like that. So when she stole the service dogs, everything, I tried to get her to give
[01:07:13.920 --> 01:07:19.680] them back. So I took her to small claims court. When I took her to small claims court, I won.
[01:07:20.880 --> 01:07:26.880] She filed an appeal. She gets into the appeals court and she says, well, I work for the County
[01:07:26.880 --> 01:07:34.080] of LA and I've worked as a witness. I've done this, that and the other. And the judge went with her
[01:07:34.080 --> 01:07:39.600] even though I had proof that she was lying. She was not a County employee. What have you?
[01:07:39.600 --> 01:07:49.840] So in October of last year, I was in the film Lawless America and I got a chance to meet this
[01:07:49.840 --> 01:07:57.360] man, Richard Fine. Well, Richard Fine found out from one of the judges here in LA County,
[01:07:57.360 --> 01:08:04.080] Judge Yaffe, that the judges are paid by the County, which is against the California Constitution.
[01:08:04.080 --> 01:08:12.560] So I began to talk to him and he began to void the judgments of the judge. So he was saying,
[01:08:12.560 --> 01:08:18.560] you can go all the way back to 1987. If you confine fraud, you still have a chance.
[01:08:19.360 --> 01:08:24.400] So I have carpal tunnels that took me a little while to get the paperwork together. I finally
[01:08:24.400 --> 01:08:30.800] get the paperwork together. I submitted it. I sent you a copy, Randy. So I go to the mailbox
[01:08:30.800 --> 01:08:35.600] Tuesday and they give it to another judge. They didn't give it to the same judge,
[01:08:36.240 --> 01:08:41.600] but they give it to another judge. And this idiot thinks that he has subject matter jurisdiction
[01:08:41.600 --> 01:08:45.920] and he thinks that I don't know that he's on the case too and he denies my claim.
[01:08:50.480 --> 01:08:58.160] So I'm waiting now for the county to give me his pay record so that I can go back to this judge
[01:08:58.160 --> 01:09:05.280] and say, you have the same problem as the last judge. You're on the date too. And your order
[01:09:05.280 --> 01:09:09.920] can't, your order has, you have to follow what I'm telling you. You have to void the order.
[01:09:10.960 --> 01:09:16.960] They seem to have this idea that the judges, what I'm finding out is that they cover for each other.
[01:09:18.400 --> 01:09:24.240] Oh, you're just finding that out. Oh, I'm just finding it out. But he doesn't realize I'm going
[01:09:24.240 --> 01:09:29.440] to be back with his payment information in a minute and tell him the same thing. Now, in the
[01:09:29.440 --> 01:09:34.880] meantime, I started to work it from another standpoint. I went to the judicial commission
[01:09:34.880 --> 01:09:39.280] and the judicial commission is trying to say, whoa, we don't have any, we don't see anything wrong.
[01:09:40.560 --> 01:09:45.120] When the California Constitution is clear, judges are supposed to be paid by the state
[01:09:45.120 --> 01:09:48.320] and not supposed to receive any other additional payments from anywhere else.
[01:09:48.320 --> 01:09:56.800] Have you looked at the judicial canons for California? Yes, I have.
[01:09:58.880 --> 01:10:01.920] There should be something in there about them accepting payment.
[01:10:02.800 --> 01:10:07.520] Yeah, it is. And I put that, that's in the filing because I sent you a copy of the filing.
[01:10:08.400 --> 01:10:13.600] I had it notarized before I submitted it to the court to put it in the public record
[01:10:13.600 --> 01:10:24.560] and then submitted it to the court. Oh, hold on. Oh, this is, this is rich. I had someone
[01:10:25.920 --> 01:10:31.520] talk to me about going to Washington D.C. and becoming a private attorney general.
[01:10:32.560 --> 01:10:36.320] I never heard of such thing. I've heard a lot about private attorney general. So I did some
[01:10:36.320 --> 01:10:46.640] research today. And I didn't find anything on what he was claiming, but what I did find is the
[01:10:46.640 --> 01:10:55.600] primary place that private attorney generals have standing is in a quiet damn action.
[01:10:55.600 --> 01:11:09.520] They're fraudulently taking government money from the county.
[01:11:09.520 --> 01:11:25.440] You sue as a private attorney general to recover this money for the taxpayers of the county.
[01:11:29.040 --> 01:11:34.480] And you keep, if the government doesn't step in, which they can,
[01:11:34.480 --> 01:11:38.560] you keep 25% of whatever you recover.
[01:11:42.160 --> 01:11:49.200] Oh, okay. Does this sound like fun or what? It's getting to be more and more.
[01:11:54.160 --> 01:12:00.800] Well, that would be, it would take quite a bit of research, but just a rumblings of a quiet damn
[01:12:00.800 --> 01:12:11.840] action. And since you're going in under quiet damn, part of what you could use the quiet damn
[01:12:11.840 --> 01:12:21.600] action for is to leverage your other arguments and issues against them because of the effect you
[01:12:21.600 --> 01:12:32.480] could expect the payment from the county to have on the judgment of the jurist. This may be,
[01:12:32.480 --> 01:12:37.760] this may be the way to bring this to the fore because you might be able to get, if you do your
[01:12:37.760 --> 01:12:45.520] research and get it prepared, you might be able to get a lawyer to pick this up. Now, he doesn't
[01:12:45.520 --> 01:12:51.360] expect to, you know, he won't come in and expect to win the quiet damn action. What he'll expect
[01:12:52.640 --> 01:13:01.760] is if he can make enough political noise, is that the county will come in and pay him a lot of
[01:13:01.760 --> 01:13:07.600] money to go away. And in the process, pay you a lot of money to go away.
[01:13:07.600 --> 01:13:15.280] How much money have these judges collected from the county?
[01:13:17.200 --> 01:13:23.440] Well, when I appeared before the judge originally, according to the record, he was there all in
[01:13:23.440 --> 01:13:38.480] excess of $600,000. From the county to one judge? Yes, from 2000 until I appeared from before him
[01:13:38.480 --> 01:13:50.720] in 2008. And when you add up the figures, you will see it's over $600,000. Oh, wonderful. And how
[01:13:50.720 --> 01:13:59.760] many judges do they have on this payroll? Oh, quite a few. So if they're having to shut down a lot
[01:13:59.760 --> 01:14:05.760] of courts because they're running out of money, you'll recover the money they need to open those
[01:14:05.760 --> 01:14:18.960] courts back up. Okay. That's what quiet damn is. It's a whistleblowers act. Okay. And you come
[01:14:18.960 --> 01:14:28.080] across this information because of your involvement being subjected to the harm caused by the
[01:14:29.360 --> 01:14:40.800] improper payments to these judges. Okay. All right. You'll have your work cut out for you because
[01:14:41.920 --> 01:14:47.520] before you make any waves, you might want to get a real good look at the law
[01:14:47.520 --> 01:14:54.960] and then see if you can't set these guys up to help make your case for you.
[01:14:56.960 --> 01:15:02.080] Get them to demonstrate how corrupt and outrageous they can be.
[01:15:05.120 --> 01:15:13.920] Okay. Should I refile one more time to void his before I file the quiet damn?
[01:15:13.920 --> 01:15:20.560] Oh, yeah. The quiet damn is going to take you quite a bit of research to get it ready.
[01:15:22.720 --> 01:15:28.560] But in doing the research, I've gotten to be a strong believer in bushwhack.
[01:15:31.280 --> 01:15:38.240] When I go after prosecutors and public officials, I never want them to do what I ask them to do
[01:15:38.240 --> 01:15:43.920] because I'm always trying to get them to do things that's going to make them look bad and
[01:15:43.920 --> 01:15:48.880] gives me the opportunity to step on them on my way up the ladder.
[01:15:50.960 --> 01:15:54.080] And it doesn't take them long to realize they're all cannon fodder.
[01:15:55.040 --> 01:16:00.000] And that's when they get worried. When they don't know what you're really up to,
[01:16:01.360 --> 01:16:05.360] that'll make them want to make a deal. Right now, Tarrant County is going to let me go to
[01:16:05.360 --> 01:16:11.040] the grand jury because the last time they got into it with me, it got really ugly for them.
[01:16:11.040 --> 01:16:15.520] And they wound up with my picture in the grand jury room with a sign under it saying,
[01:16:15.520 --> 01:16:22.800] if you see this man called security, it works. Satting them up really does work.
[01:16:22.800 --> 01:16:28.560] Okay. Hang on. We're about to go to break. Okay. We'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:16:28.560 --> 01:16:33.600] But this could be a lot of fun and you could, good chance you can get a lot of people to step
[01:16:33.600 --> 01:16:40.720] in with you, maybe help you finance the litigation. When you might retire on this,
[01:16:40.720 --> 01:16:45.120] this is Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig, rule of law radio,
[01:16:45.120 --> 01:16:52.800] our call in number 512-646-1984. Give us a call. We're in our last hour.
[01:16:52.800 --> 01:17:05.200] We'll be right back from the other side.
[01:17:23.200 --> 01:17:33.360] Compared to what I used to be, calcium, magnesium, selenium and zinc.
[01:17:33.360 --> 01:17:41.200] Take a moment now and think, if you have a little thing, every day will bring the
[01:17:41.200 --> 01:17:45.200] life that you've been looking for.
[01:17:45.200 --> 01:17:52.160] Beyond Tangerine is available at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street,
[01:17:52.160 --> 01:17:57.200] the bookstore also carries the works of Dr. Joel Wallach, founder of Young Jevity,
[01:17:57.200 --> 01:18:03.120] and creator of Beyond Tangerine. At Capital Coin in Bullion, our mission is to be your
[01:18:03.120 --> 01:18:07.680] preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value
[01:18:07.680 --> 01:18:12.960] at an affordable price. Capital Coin features a great selection of high quality coins and precious
[01:18:12.960 --> 01:18:17.920] metals. In addition to providing the best prices in the nation, we want to bring you the best shopping
[01:18:17.920 --> 01:18:23.680] experience both in-store and online. In addition to coins and bullion, we carry popular Young Jevity
[01:18:23.680 --> 01:18:28.240] products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst. We offer freeze-dried,
[01:18:28.240 --> 01:18:33.680] storable foods by Augustin Farms, Bergy Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale,
[01:18:33.680 --> 01:18:38.400] and more. You can lock in a spot price with our Silver Pool, and we set up Metal's IRA
[01:18:38.400 --> 01:18:45.680] account. Call us at 512-646-6440 for more details. We're located at 7304 Burnett
[01:18:45.680 --> 01:18:49.920] Road, Suite A, about a half a mile south of Amerson. We're open Monday through Friday,
[01:18:49.920 --> 01:19:16.480] Saturday 10-6, Saturdays 10-2. Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:19:19.920 --> 01:19:49.440] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Debra Stephens, Rue
[01:19:49.440 --> 01:19:59.760] of Law Radio, and we're talking to Jay in California. Jay, do you have any idea how many
[01:19:59.760 --> 01:20:04.240] judges are likely to be involved in this? This is going to be the whole state of California,
[01:20:04.240 --> 01:20:12.560] isn't it? No, I think it's L.A. County. Just because what has happened is that this county
[01:20:12.560 --> 01:20:23.440] has, they say that this is for judge retention, even though our judges are elected officials.
[01:20:23.440 --> 01:20:33.680] Well, they're probably saying it's to get them to run for office again, but that doesn't
[01:20:33.680 --> 01:20:42.160] sound for judge retention, extra payments. This sounds exactly like the very kinds of
[01:20:42.160 --> 01:20:53.600] thing that these laws that are in place are intended to prevent. We argued that here that
[01:20:53.600 --> 01:21:03.440] where the feds came in and offered essentially bribes to state officials in order to get them
[01:21:03.440 --> 01:21:12.080] to do what the feds wanted, and we looked at that and said, where do state officials get
[01:21:12.080 --> 01:21:24.560] authority to take money from a foreign entity, essentially a foreign sovereign? Okay. That,
[01:21:24.560 --> 01:21:32.320] if I tried to give the sheriff money to do something, he would arrest me, or if I tried
[01:21:32.320 --> 01:21:38.640] to give a politician money to get him to do something in particular, they would call that
[01:21:38.640 --> 01:21:46.400] bribery and I'd be arrested. How is it not by bribery when the feds come in as a foreign
[01:21:46.400 --> 01:21:53.600] sovereign come into this state and bribe our public officials? And now we have the county
[01:21:53.600 --> 01:22:03.120] of Los Angeles bribing judges. I am getting a lot of background noise.
[01:22:03.120 --> 01:22:13.200] I don't know. I'm sitting still. I thought maybe he dropped the mic in the toilet. No.
[01:22:13.200 --> 01:22:26.160] Okay. But you need to do a lot of research first. Okay. But if this shakes out to be
[01:22:26.160 --> 01:22:33.200] a good candidate for a quiet town, the thing that we understand is per se that the lawyers
[01:22:33.200 --> 01:22:42.960] tend not to is in filing the suit, we don't have to win it. We don't have to win and
[01:22:42.960 --> 01:22:48.000] court, since we're dealing with judges and they're all corrupt, it's not about court.
[01:22:48.960 --> 01:22:56.880] It's about politics. Everything is political. And when you start hammering judges this way,
[01:22:56.880 --> 01:23:06.320] that's really going to be political. They're going to want this suit to go away. So you
[01:23:06.320 --> 01:23:14.960] get your homework done, get all the pieces in place and then before you step out, you might want to
[01:23:14.960 --> 01:23:27.680] solicit assistance or people to join the suit with you. Okay. And they might want to shoot you over
[01:23:27.680 --> 01:23:36.800] this one. This one, this will get you into the deep into the pool. Because here you're dealing with
[01:23:36.800 --> 01:23:44.640] the really bad guys. There's there's two sets of really bad guys in the country. The bankers and
[01:23:44.640 --> 01:23:54.560] the judges. I don't know which one is more corrupt. But you're digging, you start digging into
[01:23:54.560 --> 01:24:01.040] these judges' pockets and they own lots of people with guns. So there's a way to handle that.
[01:24:02.880 --> 01:24:12.800] If you get 50 people to join the suit and fork over a little money to help support the research,
[01:24:14.480 --> 01:24:22.480] then they've got too many targets. I see. You might be able to take out one old chump vet,
[01:24:22.480 --> 01:24:26.800] but you're not going to be able to take out a people all over the state.
[01:24:30.480 --> 01:24:39.920] So have fun with it. Okay. Keep us up on up to speed on how it goes. This is how this is where
[01:24:39.920 --> 01:24:45.840] you get to be a private attorney general. And in all my research on private attorney general is
[01:24:45.840 --> 01:24:53.200] primarily two things for which the private attorney issue was created.
[01:24:55.600 --> 01:25:03.440] One of them you won't expect. The one is a quite amaction. What was a major thing that's first
[01:25:03.440 --> 01:25:11.840] created for was environmental issues. If someone damages the environment, you can't say they harmed
[01:25:11.840 --> 01:25:19.840] me directly. And you have to come to the court and say, I was harmed in order to have a controversy.
[01:25:21.040 --> 01:25:27.040] And because of the nature of the environmental issue, everybody's harmed, but nobody can show how
[01:25:27.040 --> 01:25:34.800] they were specifically harmed individually. They're just generally harmed. So they established
[01:25:34.800 --> 01:25:41.920] this special category where a person could come in and not have to show that they were personally
[01:25:41.920 --> 01:25:48.000] in individually harmed, but they were subject to a general harm equal to everyone else.
[01:25:49.200 --> 01:25:56.720] And they could file suit as a private attorney general for their in their own behalf and on the
[01:25:56.720 --> 01:26:12.480] behalf of all others similarly situated. For your case, well, not just veterans, everybody.
[01:26:12.480 --> 01:26:20.160] Everybody's in the same position here. This is exactly the kind of thing. Well, this one's
[01:26:20.160 --> 01:26:27.760] actually better because you can claim actual harm. You take people who've been screwed over by these
[01:26:27.760 --> 01:26:35.680] courts and you're going to have some pretty big players around. If you can find some big players
[01:26:35.680 --> 01:26:42.000] that are being screwed around by the courts, maybe big construction companies or somebody who
[01:26:42.000 --> 01:26:50.320] appears to be in work, to be worked over by the courts, you know, they may help you build some
[01:26:50.320 --> 01:26:56.400] political pressure because that's what this suit will be all about. It's all about the politics.
[01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:05.120] This is going to look bad because, uh, Ken's four rules, politics is everything is political.
[01:27:05.120 --> 01:27:17.120] Second rule, perception is everything. So the perception here is that the judges are on the
[01:27:17.120 --> 01:27:26.560] take. And that will create a lot of pressure against these judges. Give the counties real
[01:27:26.560 --> 01:27:38.000] good reason to write you a check and get you to go away leaving alone. Okay. In the end,
[01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:46.720] they don't care. It's not their money anyway. It's yours. But this just sounds like it has
[01:27:46.720 --> 01:27:55.760] the making of a really great suit. If you do it right, back up. Don't run in there too quickly.
[01:27:55.760 --> 01:28:09.680] You know, this is more a sniper action. You back up and you pick off the exposed perimeter first.
[01:28:10.960 --> 01:28:14.720] And you got, you're always going to have really arrogant stupid judges.
[01:28:16.640 --> 01:28:21.280] And you want to find the judges who are really outrageous. They're going to be your buddies
[01:28:21.280 --> 01:28:27.920] because they're going to give you the stories you need to tell to shake before the legislature,
[01:28:27.920 --> 01:28:34.480] before the public. See why I'm having to sue these morons is to help you guys out and protect
[01:28:34.480 --> 01:28:40.720] you from scoundrels like this. And you take the worst judges and use them as cannon fodder
[01:28:42.320 --> 01:28:44.240] to get them to come to you and make you a deal.
[01:28:44.240 --> 01:28:50.240] That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[01:28:51.920 --> 01:28:58.240] Well, I have another, I have another direction I need to go in with you because you brought
[01:28:58.240 --> 01:29:08.720] something up that is an effect that's tied up with my mother's estate. I bought a car
[01:29:08.720 --> 01:29:19.680] in 2002. And when I bought it, I registered it in another state, New Jersey. Well,
[01:29:20.720 --> 01:29:26.720] when I registered the car, at first I just had my name on it. But the insurance rates in the
[01:29:26.720 --> 01:29:34.240] state were so high, I found out that if I put my mother's name on the car that should I hold?
[01:29:34.240 --> 01:29:40.160] Yeah, hang on. We'll be, we'll be back shortly. This is Randy Kelton, Denver Stevens,
[01:29:40.160 --> 01:29:48.400] Brutal Bar Radio, a call in number 512-646-1984. If you have a comment or a question, now is
[01:29:48.400 --> 01:29:54.000] the time to call. We're going into our last half hour, but we'll be right back on the other side.
[01:29:54.000 --> 01:30:04.800] What happens when bungling burglars bother the wrong bird? They eat crow.
[01:30:04.800 --> 01:30:09.360] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht and I'll give you the details on a pet store burglary gone wrong
[01:30:09.360 --> 01:30:15.520] in just a moment. Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating
[01:30:15.520 --> 01:30:20.880] a massive database of your personal information. That's creepy. But it doesn't have to be that
[01:30:20.880 --> 01:30:26.320] way. Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. Startpage doesn't store your IP
[01:30:26.320 --> 01:30:31.040] address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies and their third party certified.
[01:30:31.040 --> 01:30:36.640] If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. Great search results
[01:30:36.640 --> 01:30:41.040] and total privacy. Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:41.680 --> 01:30:46.640] Bungling burglars bothered the wrong bird when they broke into Hobday's Pet Shop in Coventry,
[01:30:46.640 --> 01:30:50.800] England. They didn't have a wing or a prayer when they were up against the likes of Jack, a
[01:30:50.800 --> 01:30:55.760] self-appointed guard parrot with little patience for the petty perloiners. When the thieves attempted
[01:30:55.760 --> 01:31:00.640] to bird nap him, Jack clawed and pecked them into a humiliating retreat. While the burglars
[01:31:00.640 --> 01:31:05.280] bolted with a bag of snakes, a bird and some fish, they left behind bits of bloody clothing
[01:31:05.280 --> 01:31:10.480] in the wake of the Jack attack. Thanks to the DNA extracted by the winged warrior, it shouldn't be
[01:31:10.480 --> 01:31:15.600] long before police rescue Jack's pet store pals and collar the culprits who will likely eat crow
[01:31:15.600 --> 01:31:21.040] behind bars. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.040 --> 01:31:36.560] A noble lie, Oklahoma City 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of
[01:31:36.560 --> 01:31:41.200] terrorism. Based on the damage pattern to the building, but the government sends impossible.
[01:31:41.200 --> 01:31:46.960] The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say. The decisions may not to pursue
[01:31:46.960 --> 01:31:52.000] any more of those individuals. Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded,
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:57.120] tossed around. The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[01:31:57.120 --> 01:32:05.040] Expose the cover up now at anobleye.com. At hempusa.org, we offer chemical-free products to
[01:32:05.040 --> 01:32:10.640] people around the world, detoxifying, self-healing while rebuilding the immune system. We urge
[01:32:10.640 --> 01:32:16.800] our listeners to please consider our largest selling product, micro-plant powder. Our micro-plant
[01:32:16.800 --> 01:32:23.040] powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc, and silica to help rebuild the immune system.
[01:32:23.040 --> 01:32:28.160] And to create a healthy stomach flora, micro-plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is
[01:32:28.160 --> 01:32:34.160] perfect to add to your storage shelter. We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org.
[01:32:34.160 --> 01:32:39.360] And remember, all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat. We constantly strive to give
[01:32:39.360 --> 01:32:44.080] you the best service, highest quality, and rapid shipping anywhere. And we offer free
[01:32:44.080 --> 01:32:53.120] shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S. Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608.
[01:32:53.120 --> 01:33:11.600] That's 908-6912608. See what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:33:23.920 --> 01:33:29.040] Off the tools of ingenuity, to use against the work of love and equity.
[01:33:30.400 --> 01:33:37.120] The tools of master capability, to fail above all eternity. They come from natural
[01:33:37.120 --> 01:33:46.320] amenity, which set by the roots of authenticity. The tools to regain dignity, to rebuild the
[01:33:46.320 --> 01:33:53.920] crime of ethnicity. And I say, true to nature, my faith is just a sigh of relief.
[01:33:54.800 --> 01:34:03.120] Okay, we are back. Andy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rue La Radio. And we're talking to Jay in California.
[01:34:03.920 --> 01:34:09.760] And you put your mother's name on the car. Yes, I put her name on the car and what it did was
[01:34:09.760 --> 01:34:18.560] reduce the insurance in the state of New Jersey. Well, when my brother told my mother's mail and
[01:34:18.560 --> 01:34:23.840] she ended up under the public guardian, the public guardian was like, well, we won't sign off on your
[01:34:23.840 --> 01:34:29.040] mother's portion of the car. We want you to pay us for it. I was like, you're not getting a dime.
[01:34:29.040 --> 01:34:33.280] She didn't put a dime into this car. It came from me. I just happened to put her name on it and I
[01:34:33.280 --> 01:34:41.920] was able to prove it. So they didn't give me, the state has been hesitant on giving me the title.
[01:34:41.920 --> 01:34:46.800] I have a title, but it has my mother's name on it. I have a death certificate. So I took it to
[01:34:46.800 --> 01:34:52.480] California to try to register the car. California says, no, you got to get a new certificate. So
[01:34:53.040 --> 01:34:57.760] I was listening to you a while back and you took your car out of commerce. I don't want to take
[01:34:57.760 --> 01:35:09.680] my car out of commerce. I'm tired of this nonsense. Okay, but that starts another fight. And I have a
[01:35:09.680 --> 01:35:16.000] guy here who's been in jail for the last six months because he took on that fight and he wasn't
[01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:29.120] ready to fight the fight. Since your mother's name is on the title, register it in New Jersey.
[01:35:29.920 --> 01:35:33.200] Yeah, in New Jersey. Register it in New Jersey.
[01:35:35.360 --> 01:35:37.920] Re-register the car in New Jersey? Yeah.
[01:35:37.920 --> 01:35:44.080] Yeah. I have no address in New Jersey anymore because she does.
[01:35:48.240 --> 01:35:51.440] She does still? Sure. The address of the cemetery.
[01:35:54.240 --> 01:36:00.960] They don't want to take her name off of it and she's dead. Her name's on it. Register it there.
[01:36:00.960 --> 01:36:08.080] Okay. Let them raise the issue.
[01:36:11.120 --> 01:36:18.320] Okay. All right. But taking on this, you can still take on the commerce issue.
[01:36:19.440 --> 01:36:25.520] And the way I took on the commerce issue is I went to the Department of Transportation website,
[01:36:25.520 --> 01:36:35.120] the federal DOT website. And I forget the number of it. I think it's a Form 57 or something.
[01:36:35.120 --> 01:36:43.040] Anyway, there's a form to register with the DOT. And you fill out that form and they have a place
[01:36:43.040 --> 01:36:50.400] in there to register as a private operator, not in commerce. So when I asked that cop,
[01:36:50.400 --> 01:36:55.440] did you read that number off the back of my car? I said, I saw the DOT number. Did you look it up?
[01:36:55.440 --> 01:37:03.120] No, I didn't. Well, you might want to do so because that number gives him public notice
[01:37:03.120 --> 01:37:11.360] that I am not in commerce. Now, if you're just driving around in a vehicle, if it is a,
[01:37:12.480 --> 01:37:19.920] say it's a limousine and you're a chauffeur for hire, you don't have to have a DOT number on it.
[01:37:19.920 --> 01:37:24.400] You don't even have to be registered with the DOT. But you can be operating in commerce.
[01:37:26.400 --> 01:37:33.680] This one is registered with the DOT to show that I'm not in commerce. You know, if I was a farmer
[01:37:33.680 --> 01:37:42.400] and I had a bunch of grain trucks that I used to haul my product from my fields to the granary,
[01:37:42.400 --> 01:37:50.400] I'm not in commerce. And I'd get a DOT number because normally an 18-wheeler falls under DOT.
[01:37:52.320 --> 01:37:56.720] But I put this number on there and when DOT pulls me over, they see that number,
[01:37:56.720 --> 01:38:00.720] they check the number and it says they're not in commerce. So adios.
[01:38:00.720 --> 01:38:13.200] They know that. So I asked this cop, are you a police officer? Yes, I'm a police officer.
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:21.440] Are you also a peace officer? He said, I am a police officer. I said, no, no, wait a minute.
[01:38:21.440 --> 01:38:30.480] Let's make sure we understand each other. Are you a peace officer and a police officer? He said,
[01:38:30.480 --> 01:38:37.360] yes. So you're certified under DOT. And then he got this confused look on his face.
[01:38:38.480 --> 01:38:45.360] And I didn't really want to have a lot of conversation with him on the highway.
[01:38:46.240 --> 01:38:56.560] You know, I wanted to jerk him around, but I've been trying to curb my tendency to have too much
[01:38:56.560 --> 01:39:02.880] fun that way because they tend to get excited. He was good. He hadn't lost his cool and he wasn't
[01:39:02.880 --> 01:39:11.360] playing this macho routine. So I really didn't want to push him over any edges because he was
[01:39:11.360 --> 01:39:18.080] struggling to maintain his professionalism and I appreciated that from him. Besides,
[01:39:18.080 --> 01:39:24.800] Bushback is a lot more fun. He's going to go to court. They're going to call him in and say,
[01:39:24.800 --> 01:39:29.760] what in the heck is going on here? This guy's filing all these criminal charges against you.
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:40.080] Okay. Now I go to court and say, he had public notice that I was not in commerce.
[01:39:41.520 --> 01:39:45.120] And he said, you know, he's charging me a speeding. I said, well, you can't charge me a
[01:39:45.120 --> 01:39:52.880] speeding. I'm not in commerce. Well, the speeding laws apply to everyone. Oh, they do. Have you
[01:39:52.880 --> 01:40:00.960] ever read the administrative code that establishes speed limit signs? It says very clearly that
[01:40:00.960 --> 01:40:07.680] these speed limit signs are for the purpose of regulating commercial traffic. Didn't you read
[01:40:07.680 --> 01:40:19.120] that? He was getting a little tense, but he was struggling to maintain. So I kind of left, you
[01:40:19.120 --> 01:40:24.560] know, backed off on that. I didn't pursue that because it does no good to argue with the policeman
[01:40:24.560 --> 01:40:30.640] on the side of the road. They don't have any option. Even if they know you're right and they
[01:40:30.640 --> 01:40:34.880] believe you, if they want to keep their job, they'll do whatever the boss tells them.
[01:40:36.320 --> 01:40:44.160] So we'll go in and kick him in his teeth. Big time. And then he's going to go to his boss and say,
[01:40:44.160 --> 01:40:50.880] what the heck is going on here? But if you're going to take on that flight, and you want to
[01:40:50.880 --> 01:40:57.520] drive around with no license plates on your car, wonderful. Just have them in the trunk.
[01:40:59.440 --> 01:41:04.320] And I wasn't ready to take on the flight yet, or I'd take mine off and put them in the trunk.
[01:41:04.320 --> 01:41:16.080] Well, I rather like my New Jersey tag. To be honest with you, because of what's on the tag,
[01:41:16.080 --> 01:41:26.880] it's the picture of the battleship New Jersey. So I'm kind of thinking if I took the car out
[01:41:26.880 --> 01:41:37.680] of commerce and left the same tag on it, that would be my cover. Okay. Here's their problem
[01:41:37.680 --> 01:41:47.840] with the New Jersey tag in California. You cannot be cited in California for violating a New Jersey
[01:41:47.840 --> 01:41:58.640] law. And if they ask you who the car belongs to, it's my mom's. Here's the title. It's got her
[01:41:58.640 --> 01:42:07.360] name on it. They don't want to take the name off. Okay, we can handle that. I had a police officer
[01:42:07.360 --> 01:42:15.120] stop me in Texas, and I had four year old Illinois plates on my van. This was 30 years ago.
[01:42:15.120 --> 01:42:22.000] And he looked at those plates, and he said, are those plates expired? And I looked at them,
[01:42:22.000 --> 01:42:30.000] and yeah, as a matter of fact, they are. But as I understand, you can't cite me for violating an
[01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:39.040] Illinois law. He said, you are right about that. But if I see that vehicle again, then I can cite
[01:42:39.040 --> 01:42:47.360] you for violating a Texas law. I said, fair enough. And then I got plates on it. But if I'm
[01:42:47.360 --> 01:42:53.280] going to take on the fight, this is how I had planned on doing it, is I take off the commercial
[01:42:53.280 --> 01:43:01.840] plates and put them in the back of my truck. And I've got the DOT sticker on there. And now he
[01:43:01.840 --> 01:43:09.200] can't charge me for not having license. I have them. But I'm not in commerce, so I'm not displaying
[01:43:09.200 --> 01:43:23.120] them. Okay, I like that. And he has noticed that I'm not in private operator, not in commerce.
[01:43:23.120 --> 01:43:34.880] So I'm trying to try to stand on point of law. Okay. And set them up. Okay. I'll keep you posted.
[01:43:34.880 --> 01:43:42.640] Okay, thank you. This is Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Rue La Radio. We're going into our last
[01:43:42.640 --> 01:43:51.920] segment. I'll call in number 512-646-1984 on this Good Friday. We will be right back on
[01:43:51.920 --> 01:44:03.280] the other side. It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the internet
[01:44:03.280 --> 01:44:08.560] isn't so easy. And neither is finding like-minded people to share it with. Oh, well, I guess you
[01:44:08.560 --> 01:44:14.160] haven't heard of Brave New Books then. Brave New Books? Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and
[01:44:14.160 --> 01:44:19.360] DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, Angie Ebert Griffin. They even
[01:44:19.360 --> 01:44:25.520] stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soap. There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:44:25.520 --> 01:44:31.120] Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:44:31.120 --> 01:44:36.800] Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there. Actually, they now offer a free hour
[01:44:36.800 --> 01:44:42.000] of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[01:44:42.000 --> 01:44:50.560] It does exist. But when are they open? Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1-6 p.m.
[01:44:50.560 --> 01:44:58.160] on Sundays. So give them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:45:00.560 --> 01:45:03.040] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.680 --> 01:45:08.400] Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary. The affordable, easy to
[01:45:08.400 --> 01:45:16.480] understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, death by step. If you have a lawyer,
[01:45:16.480 --> 01:45:21.200] know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do
[01:45:21.200 --> 01:45:26.880] for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.440 --> 01:45:33.360] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.360 --> 01:45:39.520] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles
[01:45:39.520 --> 01:45:46.240] and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[01:45:46.240 --> 01:45:54.640] tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:45:54.640 --> 01:46:03.920] and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:24.640 --> 01:46:35.120] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, rule of law radio,
[01:46:36.480 --> 01:46:46.080] and I wanted to talk a little bit about strategy. I started out over 30 years ago
[01:46:46.080 --> 01:46:54.800] researching the law because I spent the night in jail for driving with a headlight out,
[01:46:56.480 --> 01:47:01.120] and that didn't seem right, so when I got out of jail, I got out the penal code and the code
[01:47:01.120 --> 01:47:09.200] of criminal procedure and I read them, and I'm trained as an engineer, so I read those as tech
[01:47:09.200 --> 01:47:17.680] manuals. These are the prescriptions of how the law is to be enforced, and then I looked at what
[01:47:17.680 --> 01:47:24.880] was actually occurring and thought that I must have stepped through the looking glass. I spent,
[01:47:25.840 --> 01:47:34.000] took 15 years to pretty well convince myself that when I went through it the first time,
[01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:41.680] I didn't miss anything. When I looked at what they were actually doing, it actually was in clear
[01:47:41.680 --> 01:47:48.960] and direct violation of law. It took, I guess I'm still in the process, but it took 15 years or so
[01:47:48.960 --> 01:47:56.800] to figure out what to do about it. You know, I evolved from confronting them directly and
[01:47:56.800 --> 01:48:00.880] trying to get these guys to do the right thing, which absolutely is not going to happen,
[01:48:00.880 --> 01:48:06.880] to going after grand juries, and that grand juries was a major factor, but
[01:48:08.080 --> 01:48:18.320] that wasn't the answer either. It's going to take more than that. I don't think we're going to find
[01:48:18.320 --> 01:48:27.360] a particular magic bullet. What we're going to find is a number of tools artfully applied,
[01:48:27.360 --> 01:48:37.520] and what I'm really doing here now at these later stages is crafting the art,
[01:48:38.720 --> 01:48:47.600] and what it tends to come down to is all of those issues that we have people calling in on and
[01:48:48.240 --> 01:48:54.240] complaining that they're being mistreated and they're bringing up these issues in the courts
[01:48:54.240 --> 01:49:01.920] who are ruling against them like this traffic issue. If I bring this traffic issue to the court,
[01:49:01.920 --> 01:49:08.880] I can expect them to rule against me out of hand at every turn with absolutely no regard for what
[01:49:08.880 --> 01:49:17.200] the law is because there's a lot of money involved. And one of the things we have to get over is this
[01:49:17.200 --> 01:49:22.880] notion that people are going to do the right thing. They're not going to do the right thing.
[01:49:22.880 --> 01:49:29.040] They're going to follow the money. That's the way it is now, the way it's always been. It's not
[01:49:29.040 --> 01:49:41.040] going to change. So we have to kind of get those naive bubbles broken and figure out how to use
[01:49:41.040 --> 01:49:50.000] what's being done to our advantage, and that goes to the strategies that I'm kind of weaving in at
[01:49:50.000 --> 01:50:00.080] the present. Instead of going in and taking on this traffic issue and hoping that all of a sudden,
[01:50:00.080 --> 01:50:08.160] if I give them the pleading crafted just the right way, and I go into court and I comport
[01:50:08.160 --> 01:50:13.760] myself in a compelling and professional manner that they'll just all of a sudden knuckle under
[01:50:13.760 --> 01:50:20.160] do the right thing. That's naive. They're going to do this thing. I will not win the traffic issue
[01:50:20.160 --> 01:50:31.120] directly. So I take these issues. And like I suggested to Jay in the last segment on the
[01:50:31.120 --> 01:50:42.240] QUITAM issue, how can we take what they're doing and turn it against them? How can we take what
[01:50:42.240 --> 01:50:50.080] looks like minor issues and turn them into major personal and professional catastrophes?
[01:50:51.760 --> 01:50:59.920] That's what we've been doing with the criminal side. I personally like to go in initially with a
[01:50:59.920 --> 01:51:08.880] really, really minuscule criminal accusation. I especially like to take in a criminal accusation
[01:51:08.880 --> 01:51:17.600] wherein I accuse the person of doing what everybody's been doing. And I don't accuse the
[01:51:17.600 --> 01:51:27.760] person of acting outrageous or singling me out for special persecution. I accuse them of doing
[01:51:27.760 --> 01:51:35.680] something they readily admit to. Well, yeah, this is the way we've been doing it. So what's the big
[01:51:35.680 --> 01:51:42.400] deal? Well, the big deal is it's illegal. And then we take it to the next guy in the line and ask
[01:51:42.400 --> 01:51:53.360] him to do something about it. And he refuses. That refusal is a more serious crime than the one we
[01:51:53.360 --> 01:52:01.600] originally charged. And then we take his refusal. We go to the next guy in line and charge the one
[01:52:01.600 --> 01:52:09.280] behind us. We forget the first one for the moment and charge the guy behind us and get the guy in
[01:52:09.280 --> 01:52:17.040] front of us to do the same thing. And we walk this up the ladder and create as much political
[01:52:17.040 --> 01:52:29.040] pressure and negative perception as we possibly can. Now, I am not naive enough to think that I
[01:52:29.040 --> 01:52:36.640] can go up against these guys and they will change what they're doing. They'll say, oh, my goodness,
[01:52:36.640 --> 01:52:41.680] you were right. We've been doing this wrong. We got to change what we're doing. That's not
[01:52:41.680 --> 01:52:49.280] how we're going to get them to fix it. How we're going to get them to fix it is we go in and beat
[01:52:49.280 --> 01:52:57.520] them up. We just jerk them around. When I go after these guys, I do not want them to have a clue
[01:52:57.520 --> 01:53:04.400] as to what my ultimate outcome and our ultimate intended outcome is.
[01:53:06.960 --> 01:53:16.320] Now, it is generally to get the guys on the bottom to refuse to do it wrong because they
[01:53:16.320 --> 01:53:22.960] don't want somebody like me coming and kicking them in their teeth again. So I'm going to go to
[01:53:22.960 --> 01:53:30.080] ASIL and I'm going to adjudicate this issue. I can almost assure you when I get done, this
[01:53:30.080 --> 01:53:38.640] police officer is going to have a whole other attitude. But once I have moved on from ASIL
[01:53:40.080 --> 01:53:45.920] to the prosecuting attorney, to district judge, to the attorney general, to the chief justice in
[01:53:45.920 --> 01:53:53.040] Austin, then down to the district attorney in Austin and just start and then I work through the district
[01:53:53.040 --> 01:54:02.320] judges in Austin and just make a total nuisance of myself to create all of this political cannon
[01:54:02.320 --> 01:54:07.920] fodder. ASIL is going to be sitting back there waiting for me to get back to them
[01:54:09.920 --> 01:54:15.280] because I will be creating a massive amount of annoyance. Everybody's going to be calling these
[01:54:15.280 --> 01:54:21.280] people saying, what is going on? What did you do to this guy? And they're going to say, we didn't do
[01:54:21.280 --> 01:54:28.400] anything to him. We did something. They're going to feel the heat. Once we've moved away from them,
[01:54:29.680 --> 01:54:34.000] then they can go back and have themselves a meeting and say, hey, what went on here?
[01:54:34.720 --> 01:54:38.000] And these guys are going to say, we don't know what went on here, but we don't like it.
[01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:45.360] We got some guy out there. He's getting everybody stirred up because of what we did here. Let's
[01:54:45.360 --> 01:54:53.440] look at it, see if we can keep this from happening again. That's the way it always works in the world
[01:54:53.440 --> 01:55:05.920] I live in. If I push you, you will naturally and automatically push me back. And I cannot expect
[01:55:05.920 --> 01:55:14.240] to out push all those guys with those guns. You can't either. That's not how we're going to fix it.
[01:55:15.440 --> 01:55:21.440] We're going to have to, we're going to fix it by being smarter, by developing a plan.
[01:55:22.880 --> 01:55:28.880] And for the most part now, I get to take all of these things that people bring me that,
[01:55:28.880 --> 01:55:35.520] that tend to drive them crazy and make them feel so mistreated and put upon
[01:55:36.880 --> 01:55:43.920] and use those as opportunities. Jay was complaining about these judges
[01:55:45.120 --> 01:55:50.800] and how they're getting paid by the county. Oh, wonderful. The first thing I'm thinking
[01:55:50.800 --> 01:56:00.640] is how can we use that against them? Well, once you start thinking that way, you start finding
[01:56:00.640 --> 01:56:12.240] all sorts of stuff you can do and stuff that they didn't anticipate. I don't come right at them.
[01:56:12.240 --> 01:56:22.000] I want these guys to think that every time I ask them to do something, I don't want them to do it.
[01:56:24.240 --> 01:56:31.360] Tar baby syndrome. I ask them to do something. I don't want them to do it because when they
[01:56:31.360 --> 01:56:37.520] don't do it, they're going to stick to my tar baby. And then I'll just drag them to the next guy.
[01:56:37.520 --> 01:56:45.040] It's like I start in school at the hall monitor and get him to touch my tar baby. Then I go to the
[01:56:45.040 --> 01:56:51.360] teacher and then I go to the vice principal and then the principal and then the superintendent.
[01:56:52.320 --> 01:56:58.960] And then up to the state oversight boards, you just drag everybody with me. They're all
[01:56:58.960 --> 01:57:04.960] getting beat up along the way. And the guy who started it, he's hearing about it from everybody.
[01:57:04.960 --> 01:57:14.480] So I suggest that we stop allowing ourselves to get angry at these people.
[01:57:15.760 --> 01:57:23.120] That we stop indulging ourselves in self pity. And let's get a little bit meaner.
[01:57:24.240 --> 01:57:33.520] Let's get a little bit more deliberate. And let's see if we can get every public official
[01:57:33.520 --> 01:57:40.320] in a position such that and this is, this has always been my ultimate intended outcome
[01:57:41.040 --> 01:57:48.400] is specifically judges. It has, it is my ultimate outcome to place every judge in the country in
[01:57:48.400 --> 01:57:54.560] a position such that when they step up behind the bench and look out across the bar at the gallery,
[01:57:54.560 --> 01:58:01.840] I want them wondering which one, which one of those rotten scoundrels out there are waiting
[01:58:01.840 --> 01:58:07.360] for me to render a ruling so they can run down to the grand jury and try to get me indicted.
[01:58:08.880 --> 01:58:17.200] If we can achieve that outcome, these problems we are having will tend to eliminate themselves
[01:58:17.200 --> 01:58:25.280] of their own accord. This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig, rule of law radio.
[01:58:25.280 --> 01:58:34.400] We thank you all for listening on this Good Friday Before Easter. Debra Nadia be back Monday
[01:58:34.400 --> 01:58:40.160] with the traffic show and Debra and I'll be back Thursday and I'll be back here Friday.
[01:58:40.160 --> 01:58:46.880] Thank you for tuning in. Keep listening. We'll be back. Thank you and good night.
[01:58:46.880 --> 01:58:56.160] Bible's for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.160 --> 01:59:01.600] Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:01.600 --> 01:59:07.680] what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:07.680 --> 01:59:16.000] Order your free copy today from Bible's for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:16.000 --> 01:59:24.320] or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000
[01:59:24.320 --> 01:59:30.080] cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is
[01:59:30.080 --> 01:59:35.200] truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:35.200 --> 01:59:48.480] call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.