ROL_2013-03-04_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:15.000]  You are listening to the Liberty Beats, your daily source for Liberty News and Accused Updates online at TheLibertyBeat.com.
[00:15.000 --> 00:33.000]  John Bush here with your Liberty Beats for March 4, 2013. Gold opened today at $1579, silver at $28.50 and Bitcoin is trading at $44.34.95. Today's edition of the Liberty Beats is sponsored and part by Pure Rain LLC.
[00:33.000 --> 00:43.000]  Low ride and chemical free water available in Austin, Texas at Whole Foods and Central Market Grocery Stores. More information online at PureRainUSA.com.
[00:43.000 --> 00:44.000]  And now the news.
[00:44.000 --> 00:55.000]  Early Friday morning last week a 72-year-old Austin man named John Schafer was shot and killed by an Austin police officer after the man refused to disarm himself at the request of the officer.
[00:55.000 --> 01:01.000]  Mr. Schafer had called the police to inform them he had killed one of two pit bulls that had been loose in the neighborhood.
[01:01.000 --> 01:08.000]  On the phone with 911, Mr. Schafer informed the dispatcher he was armed and intended to keep his firearm with him.
[01:08.000 --> 01:14.000]  Upon arrival, the Austin police officer, Jonathan Whitted, asked John Schafer to disarm himself.
[01:14.000 --> 01:21.000]  When John refused, Officer Whitten reached for John's gun and John defending himself from an armed man pointed the gun at the officer.
[01:21.000 --> 01:24.000]  At this point, the officer shot and killed Mr. Schafer.
[01:24.000 --> 01:33.000]  Officer Whitted is on paid administrative leave and many in the community are outraged that an Austin police officer killed a man who was lawfully carrying a firearm.
[01:33.000 --> 01:39.000]  Community members are advised to use caution when dealing with the deadly gang known as the Austin Police Department.
[01:39.000 --> 01:50.000]  Disturbing documents recently obtained from the Electronic Privacy Information Center under Freedom of Information Act revealed that the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, CBT,
[01:50.000 --> 01:57.000]  is operating drones in the United States that are capable of intercepting electronic communications along with recognizing a person on the ground.
[01:57.000 --> 02:04.000]  According to the documents, approximately two-thirds of the U.S. population is subject to surveillance by the CPB drones.
[02:04.000 --> 02:14.000]  Another document obtained from 2005 shows that the 10 Predator B drones operated by the agency have the capacity to recognize and identify a person on the ground.
[02:14.000 --> 02:21.000]  Arizona may become the second state after Utah to recognize gold and silver as legal tender authorized for payments of debt and taxes.
[02:21.000 --> 02:31.000]  The Arizona Senate voted Thursday to approve SB 1439, which allows businesses and the state government to accept payments in gold and silver.
[02:31.000 --> 02:37.000]  The Montana House Judiciary Committee voted 20-0 last week to support HB 522.
[02:37.000 --> 02:44.000]  That would make it illegal to cooperate in any way with indefinite detention sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA.
[02:44.000 --> 02:53.000]  Support for the Liberty Beat comes from Brave New Books, your Central Texas supplier of One World Way and Tangy Tangerine, online at bravenewbooksstore.com.
[02:53.000 --> 03:17.000]  This report was produced by Central Texas Gun Works, self-defense training, CHL forces and firearm sales, online at CentralTexasGunWorks.com.
[03:17.000 --> 03:27.000]  The United States Department of Justice voted 20-0 last week to approve the law of the United States of America.
[03:27.000 --> 03:37.000]  The United States Department of Justice voted 20-0 last week to approve the law of the United States of America.
[03:37.000 --> 03:47.000]  Grant Paffey told my Paffey back in my day, son, a man had to answer all the weird that he'd done.
[03:47.000 --> 04:01.000]  Take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree, round up all of them dead boys in a high industry, for all the people to see.
[04:01.000 --> 04:09.000]  That's just the one thing you should always find, you gotta settle up your boys, you gotta draw a hard line.
[04:09.000 --> 04:15.000]  But the cops will settle us, they'll send a victory tune and we'll all need that.
[04:15.000 --> 04:29.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing, whiskey for my man, beer for my horseman.
[04:29.000 --> 04:34.000]  Alright folks, good evening. This is Rule of Law Radio Monday Night Traffic Show.
[04:34.000 --> 04:39.000]  I am your host Eddie Craig. It is March 4th, 2013.
[04:39.000 --> 04:48.000]  Tonight I want to go over, for at least a little bit, the way we're going to conduct cross-examinations in these traffic cases now.
[04:48.000 --> 04:55.000]  For the most part, I've been teaching everybody that there are three very basic questions that we ask.
[04:55.000 --> 05:03.000]  And I have been looking at ways to enhance the effect of those questions at the appeal level.
[05:03.000 --> 05:18.000]  So at least as far as Texas and the other states are concerned where it is definitively a commercial activity straight out of the very workings of the code itself, which the majority of states it is.
[05:18.000 --> 05:30.000]  Colorado is one of the few states that have tried to write theirs in such a way as to make it appear as if it applies to everything that's got tires, when in fact it can't possibly do that.
[05:30.000 --> 05:38.000]  But in any case, for the rest of them, this is going to be pretty much how we're going to proceed.
[05:38.000 --> 05:48.000]  Now, in order to do this, you're going to need, of course, to know some basic information that everybody fighting one of these types of tickets has to know.
[05:48.000 --> 05:53.000]  The first thing is, is you have to be familiar with what we call the seven deadly sins.
[05:53.000 --> 06:15.000]  The seven deadly sins are the seven terms or phrases that you absolutely object to anytime they are used by a prosecutor, a judge, a magistrate judge, or a witness at any time, or even the cop on the side of the road before he becomes a witness,
[06:15.000 --> 06:26.000]  at any time when they are being directed at the activity you're engaged in or you're defending yourself in court from the accusation having been made.
[06:26.000 --> 06:50.000]  Now, the seven deadly sins, for those of you that do not know, are the phrases or the terms this state, police officer, transportation, motor vehicle, vehicle, drive, and any grammatical variation thereof, operate, and any grammatical variation thereof.
[06:50.000 --> 06:56.000]  Those terms get an objection every time they are uttered.
[06:56.000 --> 07:02.000]  Now, for the sake of clarity, this is the way I would recommend that the objection be made.
[07:02.000 --> 07:17.000]  My preference is, since they can have time before you can actually respond and object to maybe get two or three of these terms out before the objection finds voice, you need to clarify what you're objecting to.
[07:17.000 --> 07:27.000]  So, the way I would recommend it, let's say for instance the witness just testified to the term driving his vehicle.
[07:27.000 --> 07:41.000]  So, we say objection to the use of the term driving and vehicle assumes facts not in evidence, not previously agreed to, and requires a legal conclusion by the fact witness.
[07:41.000 --> 07:44.000]  Now, why does it require a legal conclusion?
[07:44.000 --> 07:57.000]  Well, first thing is, drive or driving and vehicle are all terms defined within the statute, but those definitions have not been brought forth in the trial.
[07:57.000 --> 08:02.000]  No one has clarified what these terms mean and what they relate to.
[08:02.000 --> 08:06.000]  So, that's where we get assumes facts not in evidence.
[08:06.000 --> 08:19.000]  The officer is assuming you're driving and he's assuming you're in a vehicle, which would only be true if you were also engaging in transportation.
[08:19.000 --> 08:24.000]  So, assumes facts not in evidence is exactly what the officer is doing.
[08:24.000 --> 08:31.000]  He is assuming that these words are applicable to your activities and they're not.
[08:31.000 --> 08:50.000]  Not previously agreed to relates to the prosecutor. You and the prosecutor have reached no foregone agreement or conclusion that these terms will be agreed to as meaning what they're going, what the statute says they mean, unless they've been clarified in the court.
[08:50.000 --> 09:02.000]  We have not set aside the right to object because we haven't made an agreement with the prosecutor that we will accept them in their definitive terms as used in statute.
[09:02.000 --> 09:08.000]  Okay? That's the reason for that three-part legal objection, just so you understand.
[09:08.000 --> 09:20.000]  Now, you will make that objection and, of course, as the terms or phrases change, the first part of it will change. Let's say, for instance, that he says, I'm a police officer with the Austin PD.
[09:20.000 --> 09:28.000]  Objection to the use of the term police officer assumes facts not in evidence, not previously agreed to and requires a legal conclusion.
[09:28.000 --> 09:42.000]  The prosecutor will go, Judge, he's sitting there in his uniform. We all know he's a police officer. Objection to the use of the term police officer assumes facts not in evidence, not previously agreed to and requires a legal conclusion.
[09:42.000 --> 09:56.000]  So the judge is going to have to make a determination at this point to overrule you or you can demand or try to demand that the court make a legal determination as to what the term police officer means for the purpose of this trial.
[09:56.000 --> 10:08.000]  Does it mean what it says in 541 of the Transportation Code, Judge, or are you just going to make something up so that he can use the term?
[10:08.000 --> 10:25.000]  Well, we can say objection, Judge, if the court is going to rule in favor of the prosecution to allow the use of the term, then I ask the court to make a legal determination as to exactly what the definition of police officer is as it relates to the facts at hand.
[10:25.000 --> 10:37.000]  See, we now have the court in a position of having to give us something on the record provided it is a court of record that shows that the judge doesn't have a clue what the law says.
[10:37.000 --> 10:47.000]  Now, of course, we're doing all these objections while the prosecutor has the witness and they're asking questions and the witness is attempting to respond to them.
[10:47.000 --> 11:00.000]  Now, let's move a little further forward here because we can argue this and we will. Every single time any one of the seven deadly sentences is uttered, you have to be on it like white on rice.
[11:00.000 --> 11:06.000]  Do not let them get those terms out and you fail to object.
[11:06.000 --> 11:13.000]  Why? Because the law in a transportation case is very simple when it comes to proving guilt.
[11:13.000 --> 11:27.000]  The legislature saw fit in this particular alleged criminal venue to allow a prima facie case to be all that is necessary to convict rather than beyond a reasonable doubt.
[11:27.000 --> 11:31.000]  It's written right into the statute.
[11:31.000 --> 11:37.000]  The state only has to make a prima facie case of guilt.
[11:37.000 --> 11:46.000]  And all a prima facie case is, is that mean by all the facts presented, the appearance of the truth is they are guilty.
[11:46.000 --> 11:57.000]  All they have to do to get that appearance is have one of these seven terms stand in the record unobjected to.
[11:57.000 --> 12:10.000]  If you fail to object to it, they have established that term is applicable. If that term is applicable at this time, all the usages of the terms are applicable at all times for the purposes of this case.
[12:10.000 --> 12:13.000]  That's just the way it's going to work.
[12:13.000 --> 12:18.000]  So you must listen to what you hear going on.
[12:18.000 --> 12:26.000]  You have to listen to what everyone is saying in relation to whatever the exchange is going on.
[12:26.000 --> 12:41.000]  You have to be able to take notes, you have to be able to listen, you have to be able to determine what was said, and you have to be able to voice the objection clearly, distinctly and timely as needed.
[12:41.000 --> 12:49.000]  You're going to be very busy, but nobody said it was going to be easy, and it's not, and they ensured that it's not.
[12:49.000 --> 12:52.000]  But with practice, you can do it.
[12:52.000 --> 12:58.000]  Now let's see what happens when they tender the witness over to us.
[12:58.000 --> 13:03.000]  When they say they're done questioning and it's our turn, you have to remember how this works.
[13:03.000 --> 13:15.000]  On direct examination, which is what you do when the witness is your witness and your witness is somebody that you called to appear in court, not that the other side called to appear.
[13:15.000 --> 13:31.000]  Now it is possible that you can call a witness as your witness, but you can ask the court to declare them as a hostile witness, in which case you can treat it as a cross examination rather than a direct examination.
[13:31.000 --> 13:34.000]  What's the difference between the two?
[13:34.000 --> 13:40.000]  In a direct examination, you are not allowed to ask leading questions.
[13:40.000 --> 13:47.000]  You can't ask questions that require only a one or two word reply from the witness.
[13:47.000 --> 13:52.000]  For instance, officer, isn't it true that Mr. Craig has green eyes?
[13:52.000 --> 13:54.000]  Yes.
[13:54.000 --> 13:57.000]  See, the prosecutor asked a leading question.
[13:57.000 --> 14:02.000]  You have to object to leading questions all the time.
[14:02.000 --> 14:07.000]  All you have to do to make it is objection leading.
[14:07.000 --> 14:09.000]  Okay, that's all you have to do.
[14:09.000 --> 14:21.000]  Anytime the answer can be given in one or two words, it's a leading question as long as it is done during direct examination of your own witness.
[14:21.000 --> 14:36.000]  Now on cross examination, that is when you are asking questions of the other side's witness after they have been under direct examination by the other party.
[14:36.000 --> 14:41.000]  Now you can ask leading questions.
[14:41.000 --> 14:44.000]  You can ask questions regarding previous testimony.
[14:44.000 --> 14:46.000]  You can ask questions about new facts.
[14:46.000 --> 14:49.000]  You can do any of that.
[14:49.000 --> 15:03.000]  Now on redirect, however, what the prosecutor cannot do and redirect allows them to question the witness again after you have done your examination on cross.
[15:03.000 --> 15:12.000]  Redirect allows them to bring up any facts that you raised during your cross examination.
[15:12.000 --> 15:14.000]  Okay?
[15:14.000 --> 15:22.000]  Supposedly they're not allowed to bring up any new facts on a redirect.
[15:22.000 --> 15:28.000]  Now in most of these municipal and JP courts, they let the prosecutor do virtually anything they want.
[15:28.000 --> 15:36.000]  Why? Because most of the time, especially in JP courts, the judge is completely ignorant of procedure and law both.
[15:36.000 --> 15:41.000]  And he looks to the prosecutor to take his cues as to what to do.
[15:41.000 --> 15:44.000]  And in some municipalities, they do the same thing.
[15:44.000 --> 15:53.000]  The judge is completely ignorant and doesn't want to appear so, so they take their cues from the prosecutor as to what they should do.
[15:53.000 --> 16:02.000]  Now I'm helping someone with a case in Rockdale where that is, I mean, that is as obvious as the day is long.
[16:02.000 --> 16:10.000]  The judge is completely judicially incompetent and does whatever the city prosecutor tells him to.
[16:10.000 --> 16:16.000]  There is no way you will get a fair trial in Rockdale.
[16:16.000 --> 16:24.000]  So the folks that are listening or traveling through there, you get a ticket, make sure you understand that. Okay? There is no way.
[16:24.000 --> 16:28.000]  Now that being said, we're about to go to break here in about 30 seconds.
[16:28.000 --> 16:45.000]  So on the other side, I will be going into how to cross examine the police officer and we'll go a little more in depth into the questions that I want to use to strengthen the facts for the purpose of appeal or the trial de novo
[16:45.000 --> 16:49.000]  because it will give you more to use at trial de novo as well for practice.
[16:49.000 --> 16:54.000]  Alright folks, this is rule of law radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[16:54.000 --> 17:19.000]  This is your host Eddie Craig. We'll be right back after the break. So y'all hang in there.
[17:24.000 --> 17:33.000]  And we're all breaking Tangy tangerine. Tangy tangerine. Tangy tangerine.
[17:33.000 --> 17:41.000]  We're all breaking Tangy tangerine. Tangy tangerine. Tangy tangerine.
[17:41.000 --> 17:48.000]  Order beyond Tangy tangerine and other great young Jevity products at LogosRadioNetwork.com by clicking on the Tangy tangerine banner.
[17:48.000 --> 17:56.000]  Sign up as a preferred customer for wholesale prices or become a distributor and support LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[17:56.000 --> 17:57.000]  So what do you say, Elvis?
[17:57.000 --> 18:00.000]  Tangy. Tangy learn much.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute,
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:27.000 --> 18:34.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:50.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 19:01.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:07.000]  The Rule of Law Radio Network is proud to present a due process of law seminar hosted by our own Eddie Craig.
[19:07.000 --> 19:13.000]  Eddie is a former Nacodotius Sheriff's Deputy and for the past 21 years he's been studying the due process of law
[19:13.000 --> 19:21.000]  and now offers his knowledge to you at a seminar every Sunday from 2 o'clock to 5 o'clock at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street.
[19:21.000 --> 19:29.000]  Admission is $20, so please make plans to come by and sit with Eddie and learn for yourself what the true intent of law really is.
[19:29.000 --> 19:39.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the internet isn't so easy and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[19:39.000 --> 19:42.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[19:42.000 --> 19:43.000]  Brave New Books?
[19:43.000 --> 19:50.000]  Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[19:50.000 --> 19:54.000]  They even stock Interfood, Burkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[19:54.000 --> 19:56.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[19:56.000 --> 20:02.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street just south of UT.
[20:02.000 --> 20:05.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[20:05.000 --> 20:13.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[20:13.000 --> 20:17.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[20:17.000 --> 20:26.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays, so get them a call at 512-480-2503,
[20:26.000 --> 20:53.000]  or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[20:53.000 --> 21:22.000]  First time tonight, or you have not gone back
[21:22.000 --> 21:31.000]  and listened to the archives to find out that I've updated it, send me an email with transportation script in the subject line,
[21:31.000 --> 21:35.000]  and I will be happy to email you a copy of it.
[21:35.000 --> 21:42.000]  Now, for those of you that have transportation script three, that's the current one, so don't send me another email.
[21:42.000 --> 21:44.000]  You've already got yours if you send it.
[21:44.000 --> 21:57.000]  For those of you that don't, send me an email that says to eddie at eddie at ruleoflawradio.com with transportation script in the subject line,
[21:57.000 --> 22:01.000]  and I will very happily and quickly email you a copy of it.
[22:01.000 --> 22:05.000]  Now, that being said, let's get back to the courtroom here.
[22:05.000 --> 22:15.000]  We've already learned to make the objection when the prosecutor, the witness, or the judge uses any of the seven deadly sins,
[22:15.000 --> 22:17.000]  which once again I started in the first segment of the show, so you all can listen to that and get on the archive.
[22:17.000 --> 22:19.000]  I won't waste time repeating it.
[22:19.000 --> 22:26.000]  But folks, if you do want to go ahead and get in on the caller board, please do that 512-646-1984,
[22:26.000 --> 22:36.000]  because I'll be ready to take calls as soon as I'm done going through this very short and self-explanatory cross-examination of state's witness.
[22:36.000 --> 22:45.000]  So, just for the sake of argument, let's say that we have been pulled over for a common transportation stop of speeding.
[22:45.000 --> 22:48.000]  The officer's name is Davis.
[22:48.000 --> 22:52.000]  He is on the stand, and we are conducting our cross-examination.
[22:52.000 --> 23:07.000]  We have successfully objected, even though it has not been sustained even once by the judge, we have successfully objected on the record to every usage of the seven deadly sins to this point.
[23:07.000 --> 23:14.000]  Now, the one thing about the seven deadly sins you need to understand is you never, ever allow the other side to use them.
[23:14.000 --> 23:28.000]  You never use them unless it is to be for the purpose of accentuating the negative, in other words, proving that you were not in the activity to which this term applied.
[23:28.000 --> 23:34.000]  That's the only time you yourself should ever use one of the seven deadly sins.
[23:34.000 --> 23:45.000]  Now, you will hear me use them in this cross, and you will see why I use, or at least a couple of them, why I use them when I'm doing the cross.
[23:45.000 --> 23:48.000]  So, pay close attention because this is how it works.
[23:48.000 --> 23:58.000]  Officer Davis, at any time during your alleged investigation, did you discover, obtain, or otherwise receive from me a bill of lading?
[23:58.000 --> 24:00.000]  He's going to say no.
[24:00.000 --> 24:09.000]  Officer Davis, did you attempt at any time to determine if I was transporting goods or property for compensation or hire?
[24:09.000 --> 24:12.000]  Again, he's going to say no.
[24:12.000 --> 24:18.000]  Now, that second question is reinforcement of the first one we asked.
[24:18.000 --> 24:25.000]  A bill of lading relates directly to the transporting of goods or property for compensation or hire.
[24:25.000 --> 24:40.000]  Anytime anyone is hauling freight, for someone else, there is a bill of lading, and freight can be goods or products, okay, or property.
[24:40.000 --> 24:54.000]  So, third question, Officer Davis, at any time during your alleged investigation, did you discover, obtain, or otherwise receive from me a passenger manifest?
[24:54.000 --> 24:57.000]  He's going to answer no.
[24:57.000 --> 25:05.000]  Officer Davis, did you attempt at any time to determine if I was transporting passengers for compensation or hire?
[25:05.000 --> 25:08.000]  Again, he's going to say no.
[25:08.000 --> 25:10.000]  What's the link?
[25:10.000 --> 25:29.000]  A passenger manifest is what every commercial entity uses to list those passengers who have paid for that business to transport them from point A to point B, okay?
[25:29.000 --> 25:31.000]  That's what a passenger manifest is.
[25:31.000 --> 25:37.000]  Every airline's got one, every bus line's got one, every train has one.
[25:37.000 --> 25:43.000]  If it's carrying passengers for compensation or hire, it has a passenger manifest.
[25:43.000 --> 25:45.000]  Ships have them.
[25:45.000 --> 25:51.000]  Everything carrying passengers for compensation or hire has a passenger manifest.
[25:51.000 --> 25:57.000]  But here we just got the officer to testify that he did not get a passenger manifest.
[25:57.000 --> 25:59.000]  He didn't look for a passenger manifest.
[25:59.000 --> 26:08.000]  He, in fact, discovered no evidence whatsoever of a paying passenger at any time.
[26:08.000 --> 26:23.000]  Question number five, Officer Davis, at any time during your alleged investigation, did you discover, obtain, or otherwise receive from me a driver's logbook?
[26:23.000 --> 26:28.000]  And again, he's going to answer no.
[26:28.000 --> 26:31.000]  So what's the purpose of the driver's logbook?
[26:31.000 --> 26:32.000]  Well, think about it.
[26:32.000 --> 26:37.000]  Taxicab drivers, though they carry passengers, don't have passenger manifests.
[26:37.000 --> 26:43.000]  Though they do carry a list of who's the person they're looking for in response to a call.
[26:43.000 --> 26:47.000]  But at the end of the day, that becomes their log.
[26:47.000 --> 26:53.000]  It's not a manifest per se because it doesn't list all pertinent information about the passenger.
[26:53.000 --> 26:54.000]  It may list a last name.
[26:54.000 --> 26:56.000]  It may list a first name.
[26:56.000 --> 26:59.000]  It may just list the address where they picked them up.
[26:59.000 --> 27:22.000]  So it's not actually a passenger manifest, but it is an operational log that that driver uses to record the transactions that he has responded to as a taxicab driver, a shuttle bus driver, anybody that's called for instant transportation purposes of passengers.
[27:22.000 --> 27:23.000]  Okay.
[27:23.000 --> 27:27.000]  Now, next question.
[27:27.000 --> 27:41.000]  Did you attempt at any time to determine if I was engaged in business as a private, common, or commercial carrier of any kind for compensation or hire?
[27:41.000 --> 27:53.000]  That question is geared specifically to transportation and acting as a carrier for the purpose of engaging in transportation.
[27:53.000 --> 28:00.000]  He must respond no, because he's already testified he didn't look for anything that would have tied you to the activity.
[28:00.000 --> 28:12.000]  So down here, we've summed it up that he's never even attempted to determine whether or not you were a carrier, which is one of the absolute necessities of being engaging in transportation.
[28:12.000 --> 28:20.000]  You must be acting as a carrier of some kind for compensation or hire as a business.
[28:20.000 --> 28:45.000]  Now, Officer Davis, is it correct then to summarize your testimony by saying that you conducted no investigation whatsoever, intended to discover facts or evidence proving that I was engaged in transportation as an operator of a motor vehicle while acting as a carrier for compensation or hire?
[28:45.000 --> 28:51.000]  And again, he's going to have to say, yeah, that would be true.
[28:51.000 --> 28:56.000]  Right there, folks, we now can ask the following question.
[28:56.000 --> 29:18.000]  Officer Davis, you have testified that you have no evidence whatsoever supporting an accusation of me engaging in the act of transportation as a carrier for compensation or hire in any way.
[29:18.000 --> 29:32.000]  Can you please tell me then, what was your articulable probable cause to stop and accost me?
[29:32.000 --> 29:38.000]  He's going to have to think about that for just a second, and I'll let you think about that for just a second, because we are about to go to break.
[29:38.000 --> 29:54.000]  So I want to stop talking. You guys need to be calling in 512-646-1984. Let's talk about this, or let's talk about what other issue you may have, and we'll get it all hashed out before the end of this show, which we got about an hour and a half left in.
[29:54.000 --> 30:00.000]  Alright, folks, we're going to break. This is Eddie Craig. We'll be right back, so hang in there.
[30:00.000 --> 30:09.000]  Turnabout is fair play, unless you're videotaping the cops. While police can freely film the public, citizens doing the same could wind up in handcuffs.
[30:09.000 --> 30:14.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell you more about policing the police in just a moment.
[30:14.000 --> 30:31.000]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches, and creating a massive database of your personal information. That's creepy. But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:44.000 --> 30:46.000]  Your search engine.
[31:14.000 --> 31:22.000]  Documenting police practices empowers the people and should be illegal. I say let the cameras roll. It might just put the civil back in civil servant.
[31:22.000 --> 31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.000 --> 31:44.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:44.000 --> 31:54.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. Thousands of my fellow force respond as if dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:54.000 --> 32:01.000]  My father, who lost his son, we're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:01.000 --> 32:10.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[32:13.000 --> 32:25.000]  Brave New Books? Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin. They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[32:25.000 --> 32:33.000]  There's no way a place like that exists. Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[32:33.000 --> 32:45.000]  Oh, by UT, there's never anywhere to park down there. Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[32:45.000 --> 32:48.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[32:48.000 --> 33:02.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m., and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays. So give them a call at 512-480-2503, or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[33:02.000 --> 33:07.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:32.000 --> 33:49.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[33:49.000 --> 34:08.000]  Now, the last thing I had going on before we left was the last question that we asked is, Officer Davis, you have testified that you have conducted no investigation whatsoever to determine if I was engaged in the business of transportation as a carrier for compensation or hire.
[34:08.000 --> 34:15.000]  So could you please explain what probable cause you had to stop and accost me?
[34:15.000 --> 34:26.000]  Now, the only thing this officer can do is go right back to trying to say he stopped you for a violation of the transportation code.
[34:26.000 --> 34:43.000]  That's the only thing he can go back to. But if he actually had probable cause under the transportation code, then he should know that he has to get one of these pieces of evidence to prove it.
[34:43.000 --> 35:03.000]  You can't violate the transportation code statutes if you are not engaging in transportation, which means you must be an operator or driver engaged in the business of transportation as a carrier for compensation or hire.
[35:03.000 --> 35:08.000]  It's that simple.
[35:08.000 --> 35:13.000]  They want to treat it like it's not, but it is.
[35:13.000 --> 35:23.000]  That's the whole purpose of the license to be able to engage in the commercially-regulable activity of transportation.
[35:23.000 --> 35:39.000]  I told you last show in the show before, all licenses and permits are commercial. There are none whatsoever that are not commercial.
[35:39.000 --> 36:00.000]  Done. Every single one of them is issued to somebody who is selling some service or good in a manner that directly affects the public health and welfare or they could not issue a permit or license for it.
[36:00.000 --> 36:08.000]  That's the only way they can issue a permit or license for it is because it directly affects the public health and welfare.
[36:08.000 --> 36:19.000]  Now, if you think hard enough about all the occupations that have to have licenses or permits, then you will see how accurate that statement is.
[36:19.000 --> 36:38.000]  Even somebody with a sales tax permit is doing it for commercial purposes. It's for taxing sales of corporations so that the government can get its share of their profits from us.
[36:38.000 --> 36:46.000]  It is the seller that's supposed to pay the sales tax, not the buyer.
[36:46.000 --> 36:58.000]  They're getting taxed for conducting the business. They're also needing the permit so that they have the permission of the state to act as a tax collector on behalf of the state.
[36:58.000 --> 37:10.000]  Well, how does that affect public interest? Because they're collecting public funds. If they fail to turn over those public funds, they're embezzling from the people.
[37:10.000 --> 37:21.000]  Therefore, it is regulable via the permit. See, this is not a difficult thought process unless, of course, you work for government.
[37:21.000 --> 37:32.000]  Then it's almost impossible because the person or entity you work for can't possibly be as crooked as a dog's hind leg.
[37:32.000 --> 37:45.000]  How do people believe that government is straight as an arrow? It's obviously someone that has never had to deal with it in any way, shape, or form.
[37:45.000 --> 38:00.000]  Now, folks, again, this is also a simplified script of cross-examination of a witness. If you would like a copy of this, you can also put an email in to me just like you can for the transportation script.
[38:00.000 --> 38:07.000]  It seems like during the dead air period, that got cut off. Sam, I see you there on the board, so please don't drop off. I'm fixing to get to you.
[38:07.000 --> 38:22.000]  But what we have is send me an email with transportation script or cross-examination in the subject line to eddyedie at ruleoflawradio.com, and I will send you a copy of the script.
[38:22.000 --> 38:37.000]  For those of you that I've done that recently that you have a copy of transportation script 3, you have the current one, so you don't need to email me again unless you want the cross-examination script here to look at, in which case put cross-examination in the subject line by itself.
[38:37.000 --> 38:42.000]  If you don't have either, put them both in there, and I'll make sure you get them both.
[38:42.000 --> 38:56.000]  But this is useful to know because your cross-examination of the witness is very, very short. You don't want to wander. You don't want to keep digging. You only need to prove transportation was never even attempted to be determined.
[38:56.000 --> 39:25.000]  And it was never admitted to by you because you objected to the seven deadly sins, you objected when they tried to paint you as a commercial operator, and your cross-examination questions had the officer testify under oath that he never believed you in transportation to begin with because he never investigated anything required to prove it, not ever.
[39:25.000 --> 39:37.000]  Therefore, the stop itself was absolutely illegal because he had no probable cause by his own admission. See? Not hard.
[39:37.000 --> 39:45.000]  All right. That being said, we are going to take a call from Sam in Texas. Sam, what can we do for you?
[39:45.000 --> 40:06.000]  Good evening to you, sir. I just have a question. I guess concerning a driver's license, I have a job or had a job that told me I was required to have a driver's license in order to drive a forklift for them.
[40:06.000 --> 40:18.000]  No, I'm not sure where that falls into play with this conversation, but I was hoping maybe you can either point me in the right direction in my...
[40:18.000 --> 40:38.000]  To my knowledge, there is no such law. Now, it may be a requirement of the company that you have a driver's license in general to work for them in case they want to put you in one of their vehicles, but a forklift that never goes out on the road for any reason as far as to travel down it?
[40:38.000 --> 40:58.000]  No, absolutely not. There is no license requirement for that. Now, there may, in some states in order to operate a forklift, you either have to be a union member with a union license to be a forklift operator or something of that nature, but I don't believe Texas has any of those.
[40:58.000 --> 41:04.000]  Right. They told me that it was because of insurance purposes. Now, I don't know if that's just...
[41:04.000 --> 41:19.000]  Again, the insurance can't require you to have something that could never be applied. A driver's license has absolutely nothing to do with operating a forklift in a business. Nothing.
[41:19.000 --> 41:43.000]  Okay. I don't really know how to go about proceeding any kind of legal action towards them. Well, there is no legal action unless you can show that their policy or determination or directive somehow caused you a harm. Did it?
[41:43.000 --> 42:07.000]  Well, I guess financially it did. I mean, I'm out of a job. They told me that if I didn't have a driver's license by ex-day in last month, that they were going to terminate me. So, I pretty much they forced me to resign, either resign or get terminated. That's the only choices they gave me.
[42:07.000 --> 42:31.000]  Okay. Well, the unfortunate thing is that Texas is a right to work state. Neither you nor the employer have to have any particular reason to terminate employment. The only thing you cannot do is terminate it for specific reasons, such as race, national origin, things of that nature.
[42:31.000 --> 42:51.000]  Anything that would be discriminatory on one of those basis. But as far as the other, any court that I'm aware of would probably throw your petition out as frivolous and bar you from filing anything else in the future.
[42:51.000 --> 43:03.000]  Okay. Okay. Because I don't see how you could make that argument that the harm would give you standing to sue in a right to work state.
[43:03.000 --> 43:11.000]  Right. Okay. Well, thanks for your time and your energy, sir. Just thought I'd ask.
[43:11.000 --> 43:25.000]  All right. Well, thank you for calling in. I do appreciate it. Have a good evening. You too. Bye-bye. Bye-bye. All right, folks. Sam was our only caller. I need some new bodies on the board out here. 512-646-1984.
[43:25.000 --> 43:37.000]  While we're waiting for callers, let's discuss a little bit this last question here and where the witness can possibly go with it. And we'll do that on the other side of the break if we don't have any other callers on the board.
[43:37.000 --> 43:45.000]  So, folks, y'all hang in there. This is Rule of Law Radio. I am your host, Eddie Craig, on the Rule of Law Radio Monday Night Traffic Show.
[43:45.000 --> 43:59.000]  Do me a favor, folks. If you have Facebook, look me up on Facebook. Tau Law, T-A-O, Space L-A-W. Send me a friend request. Let's get this site I'm doing up and rolling. I'll be right back.
[43:59.000 --> 44:15.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:34.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:52.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:04.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[45:22.000 --> 45:32.000]  Come and take it, because they were willing to fight for their freedom and their gardens. So are we.
[45:52.000 --> 46:02.000]  One shot at a time, just like guns on us, we're keeping our guns.
[46:22.000 --> 46:42.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. Call in number 512-646-1984. Okay, we're talking about cross-examination of an officer in a fine-only offense case. In this case, in particular, it's a speeding ticket for the transportation code.
[46:42.000 --> 46:52.000]  Now, the last question we asked the officer was this. Officer Davis, let's just pretend his name is Davis, like I said, and it's for speeding citation.
[46:52.000 --> 47:10.000]  You have testified that you conducted no investigation whatsoever to determine if I was engaged in the business of transportation as a carrier for compensation or hire. So could you please explain what probable cause you had to stop and accost me?
[47:10.000 --> 47:28.000]  So let's discuss that for a second. The only thing this witness can go back to is the alleged transportation code violation, which he just testified could not possibly apply here.
[47:28.000 --> 47:45.000]  Because if it did apply, then he would know that he had to obtain evidence that proved you were engaged in transportation to begin with. And he just testified that he did not make any effort whatsoever to do that.
[47:45.000 --> 48:00.000]  Therefore, he knows that he lacks probable cause. If he doesn't know, then he shouldn't be in this job. So he knows that transportation is not the issue here.
[48:00.000 --> 48:18.000]  He knows that transportation does not apply here. And he has proven that by his admission that he never attempted to obtain any evidence that would support that assertion.
[48:18.000 --> 48:30.000]  And we, once again, are going to rebut it. He tries to go back and say, well, you did such and such, which is the violation of the transportation code. Objection to the use of the term transportation, in this case.
[48:30.000 --> 48:45.000]  The officer has already testified transportation did not apply. Every response from the officer proves he never looked for transportation as being engaged in here.
[48:45.000 --> 48:58.000]  He's already testified it's not true. So, judge, at this point, I'd like to ask the witness, were you lying during your previous testimony or are you lying now?
[48:58.000 --> 49:08.000]  Which is it? How can you go back to a transportation code violation when you just testified transportation was never even applicable?
[49:08.000 --> 49:15.000]  The prosecutor jumped up 10 times and said transportation was never applicable.
[49:15.000 --> 49:28.000]  So why then are you now trying to say after you've already admitted you made no attempt to discover whether or not transportation even applied? That suddenly transportation now must apply.
[49:28.000 --> 49:43.000]  Probably because it's the only way you think you could attain probable cause. But you blew that chance, officer. You really did because you already said transportation was not an issue here.
[49:43.000 --> 50:01.000]  See? Make it fun. Make him sweat. Make him get up pulling at the back of his pants because his underwear is stuck. Okay? Because his butt cheeks were clenching so hard because he couldn't cough up an answer worth listening to.
[50:01.000 --> 50:09.000]  I want to make that guy on the stand puckers butt so hard it sucks his head down between his shoulders.
[50:09.000 --> 50:14.000]  Now that would be funny.
[50:14.000 --> 50:28.000]  But the fact is we have to press the issue and we have to keep it on track and not let them derail it. Exactly the same thing we have to do when they are trying to do the things they do on the side of the road.
[50:28.000 --> 50:34.000]  Keep your cool. Keep collected. Keep your head.
[50:34.000 --> 50:49.000]  Don't lose your temper. Don't raise your voice. Follow the script. Do not try to deviate. Don't add to it for God's sake. Don't take away from it for God's sake.
[50:49.000 --> 51:11.000]  Turns out I got somebody who listens not only to this show but he also listens into the Mark Stevens stuff from time to time. And it seems like there was some guy on the Mark Stevens show that which I agree fortunately the guy could not remember my name because he had an original copy of my original transportation script.
[51:11.000 --> 51:27.000]  And he had butchered it. He had added all kinds of crap to it that I would not recommend the dumbest person in the world attempt to use but this guy put it in there by himself.
[51:27.000 --> 51:46.000]  Now George Carlin has a saying. Remember that he on in one of his stage shows he said something very similar to this. Imagine that 90% or 50% of the people have average IQ of 90.
[51:46.000 --> 52:00.000]  And then consider that at least half of them are dumber than that. Well I want you to meet the leader of that half. To do what he did to that script according to my friend that was listening to it.
[52:00.000 --> 52:17.000]  This guy took every patriot nut job analogy he could find and tried to put it into my information and then pass it off as if it was all mine. When it wasn't. So I've taken care of that at least as far as the new version of the transportation script goes.
[52:17.000 --> 52:35.000]  I put it into an encoded PDF. You can print it but you cannot edit it and you can't copy the stuff out of it. That's so people can't do that stupid thing again and try to blame it on me.
[52:35.000 --> 52:57.000]  So please keep that in mind when you try to copy it and it doesn't go. That's why. Because there are those people that think clinching a metal fork between their teeth while trying to fish lint out of an hairdryer in the bathtub while it's plugged in and turned on do exist.
[52:57.000 --> 53:09.000]  Most of them are in public office. So that being said let's get to our next caller. Well the next caller I thought we had Sam was or somebody was up here but they disappeared so I'm going to go ahead.
[53:09.000 --> 53:13.000]  Let me know guys is Keith been screened yet.
[53:13.000 --> 53:18.000]  I'm going to take the chance to say he has Keith what can we do for you.
[53:18.000 --> 53:33.000]  Yes so I'd like to add real quick about your point about following the script. When you're in a court setting not only are you there to look good in front of the judge if you have a jury you have to look good and being in control means
[53:33.000 --> 53:42.000]  following the script and if you're flailing around and acting dumb then you don't look like you're in control you don't look like what you're doing. So yeah you got to like maintain yourself.
[53:42.000 --> 53:58.000]  That's not exactly why I was calling but I just do agree with that point that you made. Last week there was a caller that said he had a ticket because he just had the back of his truck hanging over a sidewalk and you mentioned something about guilt by ownership.
[53:58.000 --> 54:15.000]  And then that got me thinking because I had just gotten a bill in the mail for 72 cents because evidently I was on a toll road somewhere. So my question is does this is the same thing as that falling to guilt by ownership that they snap the picture of my truck and are claiming that I owe 72 cents.
[54:15.000 --> 54:27.000]  Absolutely. They're trying to hit you up for a fee that they can't prove you were the operator of. They're simply saying because you own the car you owe the toll no matter who used it.
[54:27.000 --> 54:36.000]  I have to pay it no matter what. No no no I did not just say that. You asked me if they're trying to do the same thing to you. I'm telling you yes. Okay.
[54:36.000 --> 54:55.000]  Now you can rebut it and say look I don't know why my car was on the toll road but what evidence do you have that I was the one behind the wheel and that I am somehow liable for this money for any reason other than the fact that I just happened to own the car.
[54:55.000 --> 55:09.000]  I'm sorry but this sounds an awful lot like a bill of pains and penalties because I don't see anything on here that says that I can have a hearing date that I can have a judge determine what this is or anything of that nature.
[55:09.000 --> 55:27.000]  So I must presume that this is an administrative bill. If this is an administrative bill that carries some sort of penalty with it if I don't agree to it then that constitutes a bill of pains and penalties and I'm pretty sure those were constitutionally outlawed.
[55:27.000 --> 55:42.000]  Yeah now I also added a $15 late penalty to it because I haven't paid it. Well of course. So should I just say since this is an administrative I just sent him a letter. I thought I just said that. I thought I even told you what to put in it.
[55:42.000 --> 55:55.000]  Yeah so that's pretty easy. Well sounds like but you can keep them tied up on this for a while. Now they are going to threaten you. They are going to try to extract money from you and they're saying they're going to keep raising the rate until you pay it.
[55:55.000 --> 56:12.000]  However as long as you can show that each time they corresponded you went in and rebutted and denied they're going to have a hard time finding somebody that can actually uphold anything they try to do to you.
[56:12.000 --> 56:30.000]  That's true. Because the legal definition of a bill of pains and penalties is an administrative or legislative predetermination of guilt without judicial review and if this is an administrative ticket there is no question that there is no judicial review.
[56:30.000 --> 56:51.000]  So the same address that they want the bill I can send that letter to them. Absolutely. And make sure everything you send every time you do it certified mail return receipt requested. Now understand something. You're going to have to do this on principle because you're sending it out certified mail which is going to cost you more than the original 72 cents no question.
[56:51.000 --> 57:10.000]  Right. Okay. But they've thrown $15 more on top of that and as time progresses they're going to keep throwing more on top of that. So eventually your rebuttal is going to stay ahead of what they're trying to charge but just be aware that your initial bump is more than what they wanted from you to begin with.
[57:10.000 --> 57:17.000]  Yeah. But the principle of the thing is where we need to be going here and I'm not trying to tell you how to spend your money but that's just the fact.
[57:17.000 --> 57:24.000]  Well it's true and I understand the principle thing and I kind of have some time and money to do it too. That's the only reason I'm calling to get info.
[57:24.000 --> 57:34.000]  Yeah. I mean I want toll roads gone. We bought and paid for those roads. If they use one penny of public funds to build that road that road rightfully belongs to the people.
[57:34.000 --> 57:51.000]  Therefore the only ones that can be charged a toll to use it are those people engaging in transportation because they are once again using our road for their private gain and to tax them on that for the use of that extra fast stretch of highway.
[57:51.000 --> 57:55.000]  I don't have a problem with that because it's got to be maintained just like the rest of it.
[57:55.000 --> 57:59.000]  What's the validity on a warrant being put up for my arrest for not ever paying?
[57:59.000 --> 58:05.000]  That's an administrative ticket. They can issue a warrant for it. If they do, somebody is indeed due to it.
[58:05.000 --> 58:08.000]  If I could just let it just pile up and just ignore it.
[58:08.000 --> 58:21.000]  No. Don't ignore it. Respond to it. Answer it. Tell them why you're not paying. All you got to do is keep repeating in every letter exactly what I told you to put in the first letter.
[58:21.000 --> 58:25.000]  Okay. Do not ignore it. That's going to be a mistake.
[58:25.000 --> 58:26.000]  Okay.
[58:26.000 --> 58:28.000]  Cool. Well I hear the music. Thank you very much.
[58:28.000 --> 58:30.000]  You're very welcome Keith. Thanks for calling in.
[58:30.000 --> 58:40.000]  Alright folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. This is our top of the hour break. We got one hour left in the show. I need some callers. 512-646-1984.
[58:40.000 --> 58:46.000]  We will be right back. This is your host Eddie Craig. Hang in there. We'll return.
[58:46.000 --> 58:58.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world. Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:06.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.000 --> 59:18.000]  Enter the recovery version. First this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate but the real story is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:28.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:44.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:51.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:33.000]  Today's edition of Liberty B is sponsored and part by Pure Rain LLC.
[01:00:33.000 --> 01:00:40.000]  Low ride and chemical free water available in Austin, Texas at Whole Foods and Central Market Grocery Stores.
[01:00:40.000 --> 01:00:43.000]  More information online at purerainusa.com.
[01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:56.000]  And now the news. Early Friday morning last week a 72-year-old Austin man named John Shaffer was shot and killed by an Austin police officer after the man refused to disarm himself at the request of the officer.
[01:00:56.000 --> 01:01:02.000]  Mr. Shaffer had called the police to inform them he had killed one of two pit bulls that had been loose in the neighborhood.
[01:01:02.000 --> 01:01:08.000]  On the phone with 911 Mr. Shaffer informed the dispatcher he was armed and intended to keep his firearm with him.
[01:01:08.000 --> 01:01:14.000]  Upon arrival the Austin police officer, Jonathan Whitted, asked John Shaffer to disarm himself.
[01:01:14.000 --> 01:01:21.000]  When John refused, Officer Whitten reached for John's gun and John defending himself from an armed man pointed the gun at the officer.
[01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:24.000]  At this point the officer shot and killed Mr. Shaffer.
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:33.000]  Officer Whitted is on paid administrative leave and many in the community are outraged that an Austin police officer killed a man who was lawfully carrying a firearm.
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:39.000]  Community members are advised to use caution when dealing with a deadly gang known as the Austin Police Department.
[01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:50.000]  Disturbing documents recently obtained from the Electronic Privacy Information Center under Freedom of Information Act revealed that the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, CBT,
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:57.000]  is operating drones in the United States that are capable of intercepting electronic communications along with recognizing a person on the ground.
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:02:04.000]  According to the documents approximately two-thirds of the U.S. population is subject to surveillance by the CPB drones.
[01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:14.000]  Another document obtained from 2005 shows that the 10 Predator B drones operated by the agency have the capacity to recognize and identify a person on the ground.
[01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  Arizona may become the second state after Utah to recognize gold and silver as legal tender authorized for payments of debt and taxes.
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  The Arizona Senate voted Thursday to approve SB 1439 which allows businesses and the state government to accept payments in gold and silver.
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:37.000]  The Montana House Judiciary Committee voted 20-0 last week to support HB 522.
[01:02:37.000 --> 01:02:44.000]  That would make it illegal to cooperate in any way with indefinite detention sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA.
[01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:53.000]  Support for the Liberty Beat comes from Brave New Books, your Central Texas supplier of One World Way and Taney Tangerine, online at bravenewbooksstore.com.
[01:02:53.000 --> 01:03:19.000]  And by Central Texas Gun Works, self-defense training, CHL forces and firearm sales, online at centraltexasgunworks.com.
[01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:28.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:03:28.000 --> 01:03:33.000]  Calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:33.000 --> 01:03:40.000]  I don't have any callers. Either I'm dead air again or I got nobody listening. I don't know which way that's gonna work.
[01:03:40.000 --> 01:03:44.000]  I thought I was sort of popular on this here radio network, but I guess not this Monday night.
[01:03:44.000 --> 01:03:51.000]  Anyhow, for those of you that do not or have not come down to the Sunday classes,
[01:03:51.000 --> 01:03:59.000]  the type of stuff that I just did out of the script tonight is exactly what we've started doing as often as possible in the Sunday classes.
[01:03:59.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  This is what we call practical application.
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:10.000]  Practical application is where we take all the information regarding the statutes and everything that we're going to be doing and studying
[01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:19.000]  and applying them to the transportation stop, to the pretrial, to the first appearance and to the court appearance for trial.
[01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  And if you ever have to make oral argument on the appeal after trial or the trial de novo when you go to the county court.
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:38.000]  Either way, the Sunday class is for practice when we have enough people and enough information already out there to the group that's attending to allow us to go to practical application.
[01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:48.000]  So that being said, the classes are from 2 to 5 every Sunday down at Brave New Books at 1904 Guadalupe Street, which is at the corner at MLK and Guadalupe.
[01:04:48.000 --> 01:04:51.000]  Sometimes we do go till 6.
[01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:55.000]  Most times, in fact, we go past 5 to sometime between 5 and 6.
[01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:57.000]  So please come on down.
[01:04:57.000 --> 01:04:58.000]  The first class is free.
[01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  After that, each class is 20 bucks.
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  But believe me, it is the cheapest legal education you will ever get.
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:14.000]  And it will put you ahead of any lawyer in town or Texas for that matter when it comes to defending these types of cases in a courtroom.
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:17.000]  I'm here to help if people will let me.
[01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:29.000]  I'm here to give you the information necessary to defend yourself from the powers that be that only want your money, your pride, and your freedom.
[01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  Come help me help you by not letting them take it.
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:38.000]  That being said, we do have one new caller up on the board.
[01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:40.000]  That is Gary in Texas.
[01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  Gary, what can we do for you?
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:44.000]  Hey, good evening, Patty.
[01:05:44.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  I don't really have a question, but I just wanted to say to you how terrific your show is.
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  And I think that maybe a lot of people are somewhat timid and maybe a little bit unsure of how the information you're giving out will work in real life.
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  But man, I tell you, the more I listen to you every Monday, and it's like going to class.
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:22.000]  I mean, I learn something every single time you're on the radio.
[01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  And I was talking to your call screener earlier, and I mentioned, or something that I thought while I was talking to him, is that one of the problems that people have in general
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:48.000]  with learning the information is that they don't commit enough time and enough study to learn what you're teaching.
[01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  And a friend of mine once told me, because I did not have a very successful college career, and I always thought maybe I wasn't very smart.
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:07:10.000]  But he said, look, it has nothing to do with smarts and nothing to do with intelligence. Being successful in school has everything to do with the time you spend studying the information.
[01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:21.000]  And I thought that maybe one thing I could share with people tonight is that learning this information doesn't have anything to do at all with intelligence.
[01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:30.000]  It has everything to do with time spent in the books. And people need to listen to you every week.
[01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:42.000]  They need to go to the statutes and the codes that you cite for reference, and they need to read them and familiarize themselves with them.
[01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  And really, I think with very little effort, the people in this great state can make a great deal of progress in shutting down this tyranny that we have received through the misapplication and
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:14.000]  enforcement of the transportation code. It will just spend the time necessary to learn the information. So I really just called to compliment you tonight and to tell you how thankful I am for your information
[01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:22.000]  and how thankful I am for your program and really how thankful I am for the network. You guys are just amazing.
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  I definitely appreciate that, Gary, we all do. And I agree with you. That sentiment is exactly correct. It is exactly the same thing I tell the people that come to my class.
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:44.000]  Class does not end at the door. I can only teach you so much in three or four hours. Anything you need beyond that to make it stick is up to you to apply yourself to.
[01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  I can give you the places to look, but you still have to go and study, absorb, and maintain it. And it really is the effort that goes into it.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:09:06.000]  I have said time and time again, anyone can do what I do if they are willing to put the time and effort into it that it takes to get here.
[01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:16.000]  I did not learn this overnight. I did not figure out how to do this overnight, not by a long shot.
[01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:27.000]  But I greatly appreciate the encouragement and everything from you, Gary. I really do. And I'm glad that we can do what is necessary to help and that there are people we have helped.
[01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:37.000]  I've gotten lots of e-mail and phone calls from people that have called in to tell me that, hey, I used your stuff and it got me out of a ticket.
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:46.000]  Or, hey, it kept me from going to jail. Or, hey, I won my case because I wouldn't give in to what they wanted and cut a deal.
[01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:57.000]  Everything like that is a win. Even if they railroad you through the court, if you do what I instruct you to do successfully all the way through, you can force the appeal to your favor.
[01:09:57.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  No matter how they railroad you through the trial court, because that's always going to happen if you go to trial. You're going to get railroaded. You have to expect it.
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:12.000]  And you have to know this material and how to use it in order to rectify it at the appeal.
[01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:32.000]  Yes, I agree. And I want to tell you, and this is kind of knock on wood and thank God, but ever since, I'm going to say in the probably the last five years through the old WTP RN network and now rule of law radio and now the current Logos Radio Network,
[01:10:32.000 --> 01:10:46.000]  I have received, I think, a total of six citations and every one of them has been dismissed. And really what happened is I just warmed down.
[01:10:46.000 --> 01:11:01.000]  I filed motions. I appeared. I did this and that, but I was just determined that they were not going to win. And in every case, thank God, they had just fold it. They'd just given up because they didn't want to be exposed to the arguments.
[01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:19.000]  Yeah, exactly. And I mean, the young lady that comes to my class on a regular basis that has been stopped several times by officers and has successfully warded them off each time except for one time when a DPS officer took her to jail and booked her for a DUI.
[01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:29.000]  And as soon as they got her booked in, then she insisted on a breathalyzer being taken. And when she blew trip zero, that cop went apoplectic.
[01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:45.000]  Yeah, he had to go run into a judge to help him fabricate some other charge that allowed him supposedly to keep her in jail. But the best they could come up with was refusal or failure to display a driver's license, which is a 521 chapter
[01:11:45.000 --> 01:12:01.000]  offense, which is not within the arrestable offenses of 541 through 600. So he had no authority to incarcerate her to begin with. So we're suing the crap out of this guy.
[01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:17.000]  And he deserves it. And one other just observation, I still believe that there are a lot of very good and honorable policemen and sheriffs and DPS officers.
[01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:21.000]  So do I. So far they have parades for them every once in a while.
[01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:23.000]  Yeah, I understand.
[01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:31.000]  No, I'm kidding. I agree, Gary, same thing. There are good ones out there, but they're being overwhelmed by the bad apples.
[01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:54.000]  Yeah, and the thing is the bad apples are being led, the bad apples. And the only way that we're going to overturn it is for more and more people to learn the truth behind the Constitution and the statutes and the codes and to have them at hand in their mind already
[01:12:54.000 --> 01:13:10.000]  learned when they're confronted with these unlawful stops and to be prepared to go into battle, so to speak, into the court setting and defend if enough of us do this, we will back this tyranny down.
[01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  And I just encourage people keep listening, study, put the time in, and we can hopefully overturn this tyranny that's occurring in our state and in our country.
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  So, you know, kudos to you, sir. I appreciate you and I thank you very much.
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:28.000]  Well, thanks, Gary. I appreciate the call.
[01:13:28.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  You bet. Have a good evening.
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  You too. All right, now we're going to go to Fred in California. Fred, what can we do for you?
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  Hi, Eddie. Good to hear the program as usual.
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:57.000]  I was just going to comment a bit on the transportation issue. In California, they call it the vehicle code. And, you know, again, it's the same thing.
[01:13:57.000 --> 01:14:13.000]  They used to have, and on some ticket forms, they still have the checkbox for commercial. And people, you know, don't realize what you've been talking about.
[01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:35.000]  And it's naturally something you've got a hammer on to get through any kind of court. But that's, it's interesting that somebody in Southern California, some, I can't remember which court came up.
[01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:48.000]  I think it might have been Fresno or somewhere down there. They came up with the argument that the officer had stopped them for an infraction.
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:54.000]  And I don't know if it's the same in Texas, but we have infractions, misdemeanors and felonies.
[01:14:54.000 --> 01:15:13.000]  And the infraction is not an arrestable offense because it's not a crime or a so-called public offense.
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  I said to the judge, hey, you know, the officer turned his red lights on, arrested me. And this was his probable cause and infraction.
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:34.000]  And therefore, he made a false arrest. And the judge agreed with him and he walked.
[01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:46.000]  Yeah, the only problem, I mean, yeah, that gets the ticket beat, but it doesn't make the point. California is one of the states where it is absolutely provable in the statutes themselves that it is 100% commercial.
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:57.000]  The California statutes prove beyond the shadow of a doubt all of it is commercial. The motor vehicle code is absolutely commercial in California.
[01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  And so the argument in California would work exactly the same as it does here in Texas. What is your articulable probable cause and evidence that I was engaged in transportation as a carrier for compensation or hire?
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:16.000]  I was not for hire at all ever. What's your evidence to the contrary?
[01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:27.000]  Yeah. Well, you know, have you ever heard Rod class?
[01:16:27.000 --> 01:16:42.000]  Yes, I've heard Rod. I've talked with Rod and several people associated with Rod. And Rod does a lot of good stuff, though I can't say I always agree with the direction he's trying to take an argument or how he's trying to get there.
[01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:47.000]  So I'm familiar with him. Yeah. Well, thank you very much.
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  All right, Fred. Thanks for calling in. Appreciate it. Great. All right, folks, Steve and Eric, I see you on the board. Don't go away. I'll get you on the other side. This is rule of law radio 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. Capital Coin features a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:21.000]  In addition to providing the best prices in the nation, we want to bring you the best shopping experience both in store and online.
[01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  In addition to coins and bullion, we carry popular young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst. We offer freeze-dried, storeable foods by Augustin Farms, Bergy Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  You can lock in a spot price with our Silver Pool, and we set up Metal's IRA accounts. Call us at 512-646-644-0 for more details.
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:53.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Amherstin. We're open Monday through Friday 10-6, Saturdays 10-2.
[01:17:53.000 --> 01:18:18.000]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-644-0.
[01:18:23.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  Ain't I a sight compared to what I used to be? Calcium, Magnesium, Selenium and zinc. Take a moment now and think. If you have a little thing, every day will bring the life that you've been looking for.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  Beyond Tangy Tangerine is available at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadeloupe Street. The bookstore also carries the works of Dr. Joel Wallach, founder of Young Jeopardy and creator of Beyond Tangy Tangerine.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:16.000]  This is the Logos Radio Net Radio Network.
[01:19:16.000 --> 01:19:26.000]  Ain't gonna fly me, don't fool me.
[01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:36.000]  Folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Calling number 512-646-1984. We've got about 45 minutes left in this here show.
[01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:43.000]  And we've got Stephen and Eric on the line and we're gonna go to Stephen first. Stephen, what can we do for you here in Texas?
[01:19:43.000 --> 01:20:03.000]  Well, while I was on hold as usual, as soon as I started, I asked a question I kind of stumbled on the answer. My original question was, if I was wanting to bring a civil suit, and in this case it wouldn't be against the chief appraiser from my county, in regard to a case of trespass,
[01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:22.000]  I was wanting to see if the statute of limitations was. And he was effectively the criminal charges last year for what he did in January. I brought the charges in April. It took me a little while to think I even knew what I was talking about.
[01:20:22.000 --> 01:20:35.000]  And by, I guess, May or June, they'd come back with, you know, there's no, we can't find that he intended to harm anybody. Of course, I knew they weren't gonna come up with anything.
[01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:43.000]  It wasn't really the, we know those things aren't gonna end up in our favor, but that's all right. They have to be made and they certainly are taking notice.
[01:20:43.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  But now, I've put in for the public information for that case. I want to see what they came up with on that side. And I was ready to start putting together my civil lawsuit.
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:21:03.000]  And my original question again was, what was the statute of limitations? And of course, I stumbled on the answer right while I was on hold.
[01:21:03.000 --> 01:21:11.000]  Yeah, the answer to that would, you'd have to look at the O'Connor's Texas causes of action, but it's either going to be one year or two.
[01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:23.000]  All right, so here's what I want to ask you as I search criminal procedure chapter 16 on limitations.
[01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:32.000]  Two year limitation on, it's saying trespass in general. However, I wanted to ask you of a technicality.
[01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:41.000]  But the difference there is the criminal versus the civil. Two years to be charged with it criminally.
[01:21:41.000 --> 01:21:46.000]  Okay, but this is in the civil procedure code.
[01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:56.000]  Okay, but that would be where you'd need to look there and in the causes of action, which would solidify that just in case the courts have tried to determine something different.
[01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:02.000]  But check them both. But yeah, it should either be one year or two years.
[01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:18.000]  Okay. And the other, the other, the slight twist of fate here, if he is a elected public official for a political subdivision for the state of Texas under four year limitations period,
[01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:28.000]  chapter 16, section 16, breach of fiduciary duty. He was outside of his jurisdiction on private property. Is that not a breach of fiduciary duty?
[01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  No, fiduciary duty is something else.
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  Okay.
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  No, you will never get that under fiduciary duty.
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  Okay, I was just checking. And I did, after listening long enough, I stumbled upon the Texas Rules of Court real cheap that was used for 2010.
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:58.000]  And I was just starting to read into that here to not to go along with it.
[01:22:58.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  Although I was pretty, I was liking what I saw, parties to suits. You start to see that everything in the rules for court goes completely against all the lies I've been told on the law.
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  Rule 33, suits by or against counting. So it's by or against the county or incorporated city or town or village.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:22.000]  I'll be in its corporate name there again until two years ago.
[01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:32.000]  Yeah, that's if you're suing the corporate entity. If you're suing the employee as an individual, that would be you wouldn't need to name the city.
[01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:43.000]  But if you just sue the employee in their personal and official capacities, then you have to name his employer as a primary person in the suit.
[01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:45.000]  Okay.
[01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  I was just stating the fact that as I go through here, I see so many things that were hidden to my knowledge through my life. That's all I was getting.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:06.000]  And then of course, right under it, it uses for Rule 34 against the sheriff and such. It all of a sudden uses the term official character for any act done in his official character.
[01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:17.000]  Let's not see. So we can learn to differentiate between such and its private capacity in their official duties. So I'm sorry. I kind of stumbled on the answer while I was on hold.
[01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:21.000]  And now, suddenly, I've hit a whole new fund wealth of information.
[01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  So the next one is if you're suing them on their official bond. That's pretty fun.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:26.000]  Yeah.
[01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:37.000]  Well, man, I'm sorry. Like I said, as usually happens, just like if I lose something, it's not till I buy another. I don't find the old one. So, you know, hey, while I was on hold, that's not the answer.
[01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:39.000]  Not a problem. That's what we're here for.
[01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:53.000]  Well, I'll let you know how it goes because I've got a date to peruse every record for every bit of information they got on my piece of land, my wife's name, my name, all the way back.
[01:24:53.000 --> 01:25:02.000]  I want to say it all. So, you know, I put that in and sure enough, they responded promptly. So I've got my date. I want to go through it. I want them to know I'm on the case.
[01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:04.000]  All right. Well, good luck.
[01:25:04.000 --> 01:25:06.000]  Hey, have a good night. Thank you for your help, sir.
[01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:08.000]  You too. Very welcome. And thanks for calling in.
[01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  Sure. Bye.
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  Bye-bye. All right. Now we're going to go to Eric in Texas. Eric, what can we do for you?
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:28.000]  Hey, Eddie, a couple of things. I wanted to ask you if you, kind of to reinforce what you were talking about under commercial activity in the transportation code, do you know Section 201904?
[01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  Yes, I do. The state shall have, the department shall have the authority to direct speed signs on the highways for the purpose of regulating commercial motor vehicles, trucks, tractors, tractor trailers, and commercial motor vehicles for the
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:45.000]  transportation of passengers for compensation or hire, meaning buses.
[01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:55.000]  Plain and simple. It clearly says commercial or transportation for transporting passengers for compensation or hire.
[01:25:55.000 --> 01:26:00.000]  Yes. All posted speed limits apply only to commercial motor vehicles.
[01:26:00.000 --> 01:26:07.000]  Right. Right. Right. And yeah, could you use that if you had a jury trial? Even though...
[01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:15.000]  Absolutely. And let me tell you what they're going to do when you do that. They're going to jump to 545.351 and 352.
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  They're going to say that 352 lists the prima facie speed limits and that 352 in and of itself says that going faster than the posted speed limit is a prima facie offense.
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  However, they forget the requirements of 351. There are three things they never prove out of 545.351 of the transportation code.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:44.000]  They never prove, one, transportation was involved.
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  Two, that you failed to take into consideration the conditions then existing that would have caused you to collide with another vehicle that was lawfully entering the highway.
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:27:00.000]  They never prove a collision occurred. Okay.
[01:27:00.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  And the third thing they never prove is all of the above. I mean, think about it.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  They never prove that you were engaging in transportation. They never prove that you had a collision.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:20.000]  They never prove that you could possibly have violated the statute via those means.
[01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  No victim, no crime.
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:28.000]  In this particular case, that's exactly right. The speeding statute specifically requires that there be a victim.
[01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:38.000]  545.351 makes that very clear. There has to be property damage resulting from a collision. Death or injury or property damage.
[01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  Therefore, proving that you were traveling beyond a safe and reasonable.
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:51.000]  Correct. That is exactly the reason why they have to say under circumstances other than reasonable and prudent.
[01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:57.000]  The speed limit alone does not constitute unreasonable or imprudent.
[01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:03.000]  They have to show that the act was so negligent that it resulted in harm.
[01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  And they never, ever do that.
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  Another subject that I'd like to go to is I called in at the time and talked to you about a traffic stop that was made upon me from automating cameras and perigating my license plate.
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:27.000]  I refused to show my driver's license, which would have therefore admitted me into transportation.
[01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:35.000]  I did get brought to jail. They did tow my truck from a private parking lot.
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:53.000]  The judge magistrate, whatever he wants to call himself, in jail the next morning entered a plea of not guilty for me, even though I told him I clearly did not have anything to plead to.
[01:28:53.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  Is this a court of record?
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  I bet it was recorded.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:07.000]  Is this a court of record? Is there a court reporter present?
[01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:11.000]  I would have to say no. I was in jail at that time.
[01:29:11.000 --> 01:29:19.000]  Okay. Then they already have a problem because all those proceedings are required to be public and they're not public if you're in jail when they do it.
[01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:25.000]  And here's the other thing. What is the charge? Is it finally Class C?
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  I do believe it says, let's see here, citation by way from one, expired registration.
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:36.000]  Yeah. Class C.
[01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:38.000]  Didn't pay a driver's license.
[01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:42.000]  Okay. Hang on just a second, Eric, and we'll finish you up on the other side there, okay?
[01:29:42.000 --> 01:29:43.000]  Yep.
[01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  All right, folks. This is rule of law radio. We have Jason on the board after Eric, then we are out of callers.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:57.000]  Call at number 512-646-1984. Just give us a call and we'll take care of this on the other side of the break.
[01:29:57.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  We will be right back.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:06.000]  Could an I.D. microchip cause cancer? For a growing number of pets, the answer tragically is yes.
[01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:12.000]  Tribulated tumors have prompted a lawsuit against home again and calls to stop mandatory pet chipping laws.
[01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  I'm Dr. Katherine Olbrecht and I'll be right back with the story.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:23.000]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:24.000]  That's creepy.
[01:30:24.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:29.000]  StartPage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:29.000 --> 01:30:35.000]  StartPage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies and their third party certified.
[01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:40.000]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with StartPage.
[01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:46.000]  StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  Andrea Rutherford thought she was doing the right thing by having a home again microchip implanted in her cat, Vulcan.
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:55.000]  But things changed when she found a lump growing around the chip.
[01:30:55.000 --> 01:30:59.000]  The lump turned out to be fibrosarcoma, a dangerous form of cancer.
[01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:03.000]  Fortunately, Vulcan survived after surgery, chemotherapy and radiation.
[01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  Now his owner is suing home again's parent company, Merck, for expenses and wants to alert others to the problem.
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:13.000]  If your pet has a microchip, check the implant site regularly for lumps.
[01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:16.000]  Have anything suspicious examined by your vet.
[01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:18.000]  And if your pet is chip-free, keep it that way.
[01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:21.000]  A caller and a tag never gave anyone cancer.
[01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:26.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  A Noble Lie, Oklahoma City, 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:41.000]  Based on the damage pattern to the building, but the government sends impossible.
[01:31:41.000 --> 01:31:45.000]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:48.000]  The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  The people that did the things they did knew drawn on well what they were doing.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Expose the cover up now at anoblelie.com.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:07.000]  At hempusa.org, we offer chemical-free products to people around the world.
[01:32:07.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  Detoxifying, self-healing while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:16.000]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest-selling product, micro-plant powder.
[01:32:16.000 --> 01:32:23.000]  Our micro-plant powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc and silica to help rebuild the immune system.
[01:32:23.000 --> 01:32:28.000]  And to create a healthy stomach flora, micro-plant powder is excellent for daily intake
[01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:30.000]  and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:32:30.000 --> 01:32:34.000]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org.
[01:32:34.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  And remember, all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:43.000]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality and rapid shipping anywhere.
[01:32:43.000 --> 01:32:47.000]  And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:53.000]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608.
[01:32:53.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  That's 908-6912608.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:33:01.000]  See what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:33:26.000 --> 01:33:42.000]  Alright folks, we are back today.
[01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:44.000]  That was short, but here we go.
[01:33:44.000 --> 01:33:46.000]  Alright, we're going to finish up with Eric and then we're going to take Jason.
[01:33:46.000 --> 01:33:50.000]  Alright Eric, let's get you on the roll here.
[01:33:50.000 --> 01:33:57.000]  Okay, let's see here.
[01:33:57.000 --> 01:33:59.000]  So right now I'm going to go to trial on next Tuesday of jury trial.
[01:33:59.000 --> 01:34:03.000]  I have yet to attain a copy of the video of the stop.
[01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  And I also would like to know how I go about, I guess, through discovery.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:16.000]  How do I do discovery to make the prosecutor tell me exactly what code,
[01:34:16.000 --> 01:34:21.000]  or what section of the transportation code he plans on trying to prosecute me under
[01:34:21.000 --> 01:34:24.000]  so I can pin them down?
[01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:27.000]  They're never going to tell you.
[01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  Reasonable due process says they have to tell you what law they're charging you under,
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:36.000]  but so far no courts forcing them to do it.
[01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:40.000]  The court says if they just make a general declaration of some alleged defense,
[01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  it doesn't matter if that offense exists in law or not,
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:48.000]  you're supposed to be able to figure out what statute applies to it.
[01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  Wow, okay.
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:56.000]  I will say this is when I went, I've been to the court twice.
[01:34:56.000 --> 01:35:01.000]  I've seen the judge three times including the one time in jail.
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:03.000]  The last time that...
[01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:06.000]  Have they ever served you with a sworn copy of a complaint?
[01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:07.000]  No.
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  Okay, they're already screwed under 45.018B of the code of criminal procedure then.
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:22.000]  Okay, but let me say this is the last time that I went and met with the prosecutor.
[01:35:22.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  He said, well, if you tell me you got the vehicle re-registered,
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  I'm willing to dismiss this, I'm willing to give you back all your money.
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  And I said, I re-registered my private property as the vehicle.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:40.000]  And it was almost as if he knew where I was trying to go and he cut me off.
[01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  He goes, it's a yes or no question.
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:45.000]  And I said, I re-generated.
[01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:48.000]  I re-registered my private property.
[01:35:48.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  I was heading towards to operate as a motor vehicle.
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  And then he then asked the judge, oh, you know what else I did do too?
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  Is when I sat down with him, I said, foreign on the record,
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:09.000]  I'm here on special appearance only as court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  And he said, we're not on the record.
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:14.000]  And then I went through what I just told you about.
[01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:20.000]  And then he asked for the judge to come out from the back.
[01:36:20.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  They turned on the recording so we'd be on record.
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:29.000]  And I locked up Eddie and I didn't say my spiel about foreign on the record.
[01:36:29.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  I'm here, you know, on special appearance only.
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:43.000]  But anyway, the judge again entered a plea at the direction of the prosecutor that a not guilty plea.
[01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  And then we're...
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:45.000]  One moment.
[01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:47.000]  What happened to the deal of dismissing the charge?
[01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:52.000]  I wouldn't concede to his terminology.
[01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:53.000]  Okay.
[01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:56.000]  Well, but the problem here, Eric, is you did.
[01:36:56.000 --> 01:37:05.000]  Why make the argument of registering my private property as a vehicle as being distinctive from what he's saying?
[01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:07.000]  Because it isn't.
[01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  When you registered it, you registered it as a vehicle.
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:14.000]  That's the only way you can register it.
[01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:16.000]  For my optional use.
[01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:17.000]  No.
[01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:18.000]  Listen to me.
[01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:22.000]  Whether or not you're actually using it for that purpose is a whole different animal.
[01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:29.000]  It's completely different from whether or not you registered it and made it usable as such.
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:30.000]  Yes.
[01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:31.000]  Okay.
[01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  And that's all he was wanting you to admit that you had registered it so that it could be used as a vehicle.
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:47.000]  He made no implication that you were using it at the time of the alleged defense as a vehicle.
[01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:55.000]  Had he done that, then your only defense would have been to say, no, I haven't, and I'm not going to.
[01:37:55.000 --> 01:38:04.000]  But the moment you re-registered it, the way you're trying to qualify the argument became moot.
[01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:10.000]  Now, the second mistake you made, not making him write the offer down and sign it.
[01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:12.000]  Oh, okay.
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  Now you've got something to wave at the judge, judge, you can't enter a plea.
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:19.000]  He said he would dismiss the charge.
[01:38:19.000 --> 01:38:21.000]  I agreed to the plea agreement.
[01:38:21.000 --> 01:38:22.000]  Here it is in writing.
[01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:27.000]  You can't enter a plea you have to dismiss.
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:28.000]  Okay.
[01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:30.000]  I never knew that was even an option.
[01:38:30.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  Well, of course it's an option.
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:35.000]  They're trying to contract with you by offering you that deal.
[01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  Make them put it in writing and sign it.
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:43.000]  That folks is an actual contract agreement.
[01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  He's offering you a deal.
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  He is specifying terms of the deal.
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:52.000]  Make him write them down and sign them.
[01:38:52.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  Okay.
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  Okay.
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:38:58.000]  All right.
[01:38:58.000 --> 01:38:59.000]  Let me see this.
[01:38:59.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  Eddie, are you available for off-air counseling on how to go about this?
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  Absolutely.
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  Two ounces of silver per hour.
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  Two per hour, so okay.
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:11.000]  And how do I reach you for that?
[01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:16.000]  You can send me an email with a phone number at Eddie at Rule of Law Radio,
[01:39:16.000 --> 01:39:19.000]  EDDIE, at Rule of Law Radio.
[01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:22.000]  And I will be happy to give you a call and make arrangements.
[01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:23.000]  Okay.
[01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  I'll do that, Eddie, because I'd like to, I'd like to, I don't know,
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:31.000]  maybe you can tell me where there are or be pursuing this at this point.
[01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  Do you think they're actually going to file this?
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  Do you think I'll actually...
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:39.000]  If you didn't take the deal or they didn't agree to the deal, then odds are,
[01:39:39.000 --> 01:39:42.000]  yeah, you're going to trial if the prosecutor doesn't honor the agreement
[01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:46.000]  because you didn't get it in writing.
[01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:51.000]  Well, he, he told me when I was replying to him, he said,
[01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:55.000]  that's a yes or no proposition or it's either a yes or no answer.
[01:39:55.000 --> 01:39:57.000]  And he was correct.
[01:39:57.000 --> 01:40:03.000]  The way he asked it and the answer you gave him made it only a yes or no answer.
[01:40:03.000 --> 01:40:04.000]  Okay.
[01:40:04.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  Now, if he took that as your refusal to accept the deal,
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:12.000]  you're going to trial, my friend, unless they find some reason to dismiss it before then.
[01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  And you can get that to happen under 45.018b if you raise that as an issue, possibly.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:23.000]  But you raise every issue you have for due process violations
[01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:26.000]  and you document every one of them in writing.
[01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  If you have the seminar material, then you have the documents to do that.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:35.000]  If you don't, that's the first thing you need to be doing is getting that
[01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:40.000]  because everything you need to file for these idiots is already in there.
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  Okay.
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:55.000]  It is, I guess I'm well past worrying about the wrong year model that they listed on the ticket.
[01:40:55.000 --> 01:40:56.000]  That's merits.
[01:40:56.000 --> 01:41:01.000]  We do not go to merits without standing due process violations.
[01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:04.000]  We're just not even in the game of transportation or traffic.
[01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:06.000]  That is correct.
[01:41:06.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  You can't have traffic without being in transportation.
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:14.000]  Yep, yep.
[01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  Let's see what I think.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:21.000]  I guess it's more or less the highlights of it, Eddie.
[01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:22.000]  Okay.
[01:41:22.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  Anyway, while I send you an email, I'll see you here in just short
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  and then maybe I can talk to you in the next day or two.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:29.000]  All right.
[01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:31.000]  Just make sure you include your phone number, okay?
[01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:32.000]  I'll do it.
[01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  Thank you, buddy.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:34.000]  All right, Eric.
[01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  Have a good night and thanks for calling in.
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:36.000]  Okay.
[01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:37.000]  All right.
[01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  Mary, I see you there on the board.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  I got one caller ahead of you.
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:42.000]  Jason, let me see what I can do about that and I'll get you on.
[01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  So please don't drop off, sweetheart.
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  All right, Jason, what do you got?
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:46.000]  Hey, Eddie.
[01:41:46.000 --> 01:41:49.000]  I'm the guy that had the truck hanging over the driveway.
[01:41:49.000 --> 01:41:50.000]  Yep.
[01:41:50.000 --> 01:41:53.000]  I've got a civil parking violation notice here.
[01:41:53.000 --> 01:42:00.000]  I've got the motions to dismiss for lack of subject manager jurisdiction.
[01:42:00.000 --> 01:42:01.000]  There's no commerce.
[01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:02.000]  I've got all that stuff down.
[01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:09.000]  What I'm looking for now is I looked on the municipal code for the city website
[01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:13.000]  and it gives basically them carte blanche to do whatever they want
[01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  in administrative hearing.
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  No, it doesn't.
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:20.920]  It can't give them carte blanche to violate your right of due process.
[01:42:20.920 --> 01:42:22.080]  I understand that.
[01:42:22.080 --> 01:42:31.480]  And what I'm looking for is, is there a state body of rule that would govern an administrative
[01:42:31.480 --> 01:42:33.080]  procedure in a municipal...
[01:42:33.080 --> 01:42:37.040]  Well, of course there is, but they're not going to follow them.
[01:42:37.040 --> 01:42:41.440]  But you don't want to participate in their administrative hearing to begin with.
[01:42:41.440 --> 01:42:42.440]  Right.
[01:42:42.440 --> 01:42:46.840]  So the first thing you're objecting to is the ticket as a bill of pains and penalties.
[01:42:46.840 --> 01:42:50.920]  The second thing you're objecting to is having any written agreement with the city that binds
[01:42:50.920 --> 01:42:53.000]  you to any of those ordinances.
[01:42:53.000 --> 01:43:00.360]  The third thing you're disagreeing with is the lack of judicial review of any issue.
[01:43:00.360 --> 01:43:09.480]  You will not give jurisdiction to anything other than a properly licensed judge who has
[01:43:09.480 --> 01:43:15.560]  a current valid oath of office.
[01:43:15.560 --> 01:43:24.760]  You will not accept any participation by anyone else presiding over some alleged hearing.
[01:43:24.760 --> 01:43:25.760]  Okay.
[01:43:25.760 --> 01:43:30.560]  So I don't even go to lack of sufficient notice, sufficient family notice and all that?
[01:43:30.560 --> 01:43:31.560]  No.
[01:43:31.560 --> 01:43:35.160]  Because they don't have any authority to have you there unless you agree to be there and
[01:43:35.160 --> 01:43:37.560]  you're absolutely not going to agree.
[01:43:37.560 --> 01:43:42.080]  All right, Jason, thanks for calling in.
[01:43:42.080 --> 01:43:43.080]  All right, Mary.
[01:43:43.080 --> 01:43:44.080]  Hang on there, sweetie.
[01:43:44.080 --> 01:43:46.080]  I'll get you right on the other side of this break.
[01:43:46.080 --> 01:43:47.080]  Okay.
[01:43:47.080 --> 01:43:51.080]  Folks, 512-646-1984, I got one segment left.
[01:43:51.080 --> 01:43:55.200]  I don't know how long Mary will be, but just in case if somebody wants to get in line,
[01:43:55.200 --> 01:43:56.880]  I'll take you after Mary when we're done.
[01:43:56.880 --> 01:44:00.680]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[01:44:00.680 --> 01:44:05.520]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't
[01:44:05.520 --> 01:44:09.200]  so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:44:09.200 --> 01:44:12.480]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[01:44:12.480 --> 01:44:13.480]  Brave New Books?
[01:44:13.480 --> 01:44:14.480]  Yes.
[01:44:14.480 --> 01:44:18.720]  Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones,
[01:44:18.720 --> 01:44:20.640]  Ron Paul and G. Edward Griffin.
[01:44:20.640 --> 01:44:24.040]  They even stock Interfood, Berkey products and Calvin Soaps.
[01:44:24.040 --> 01:44:26.960]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:44:26.960 --> 01:44:28.440]  Go check it out for yourself.
[01:44:28.440 --> 01:44:32.720]  It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:44:32.720 --> 01:44:36.000]  There's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:41.400]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking
[01:44:41.400 --> 01:44:43.400]  facility just behind the bookstore.
[01:44:43.400 --> 01:44:47.400]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:44:47.400 --> 01:44:52.160]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[01:44:52.160 --> 01:44:58.720]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:58.720 --> 01:45:04.720]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.720 --> 01:45:10.720]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD
[01:45:10.720 --> 01:45:14.720]  course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.720 --> 01:45:19.720]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.720 --> 01:45:23.720]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.720 --> 01:45:27.720]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.720 --> 01:45:34.720]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.720 --> 01:45:39.720]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:45:39.720 --> 01:45:43.720]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.720 --> 01:45:49.720]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.720 --> 01:45:52.720]  prosay tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.720 --> 01:46:01.720]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:17.720 --> 01:46:19.720]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:46:19.720 --> 01:46:21.720]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:21.720 --> 01:46:23.720]  We have Mary on the board.
[01:46:23.720 --> 01:46:25.720]  Mary, what can we do for you?
[01:46:25.720 --> 01:46:29.720]  Hey Eddie, I'm good to hear your happy voice.
[01:46:29.720 --> 01:46:30.720]  Oh, well thank you very much.
[01:46:30.720 --> 01:46:31.720]  Good to hear yours as well.
[01:46:31.720 --> 01:46:35.720]  I hear from the call screener you've got something about some bill going through
[01:46:35.720 --> 01:46:37.720]  the legislature at the moment.
[01:46:37.720 --> 01:46:39.720]  Yeah, I was at home last week.
[01:46:39.720 --> 01:46:45.720]  My car is in the shop, so I sit at home watching some TV, and I saw how Monsanto
[01:46:45.720 --> 01:46:49.720]  won another case against a small farmer.
[01:46:49.720 --> 01:46:55.720]  And it just made me realize that we got to start getting in there in the
[01:46:55.720 --> 01:46:59.720]  legislature and getting in the fed courts as well.
[01:46:59.720 --> 01:47:04.720]  I've decided I'm going to go court-watching the Supreme Court this April.
[01:47:04.720 --> 01:47:08.720]  They're having a DNA patent law issue come up.
[01:47:08.720 --> 01:47:12.720]  So I'm going to go court-watching the Supreme Court, you guys.
[01:47:12.720 --> 01:47:14.720]  Well good.
[01:47:14.720 --> 01:47:19.720]  So I also decided that I was going to draft a bill for the allowance and
[01:47:19.720 --> 01:47:26.720]  protection of electronic typewriting and video and audio recording in court.
[01:47:26.720 --> 01:47:34.720]  I spoke with Nayshat's office, L.A. Nayshat, his office last week, and they
[01:47:34.720 --> 01:47:36.720]  agreed to help me.
[01:47:36.720 --> 01:47:41.720]  Some of my friends in international nonprofits suggested that since it's
[01:47:41.720 --> 01:47:46.720]  too late to introduce a bill, that I can make an amendment to a bill.
[01:47:46.720 --> 01:47:51.720]  So I just, after being in a conference at the Capitol today on the renewable
[01:47:51.720 --> 01:47:57.720]  energy industry, my friends, I sat in for about three hours at some, I think it's
[01:47:57.720 --> 01:48:02.720]  called the Judiciary Committee, and I knew some of the folks in there from my
[01:48:02.720 --> 01:48:08.720]  testimony in the Human Services Committee two weeks ago trying to restrict
[01:48:08.720 --> 01:48:14.720]  the over-prescription of anti-psychotics to children under five years old,
[01:48:14.720 --> 01:48:17.720]  especially in the foster care system.
[01:48:17.720 --> 01:48:21.720]  So he was already familiar with me and he was familiar with TAG, and I spent a
[01:48:21.720 --> 01:48:25.720]  long time talking to one of these individuals after sitting through their
[01:48:25.720 --> 01:48:27.720]  committee for about two or three hours.
[01:48:27.720 --> 01:48:30.720]  It was really interesting because the lobbyist from Halliburton came up and
[01:48:30.720 --> 01:48:33.720]  was trying to introduce some programs and all this.
[01:48:33.720 --> 01:48:36.720]  So it's kind of funny what you see when you're just hanging around.
[01:48:36.720 --> 01:48:40.720]  But anyways, I hope everyone out there will help and support me if I need to
[01:48:40.720 --> 01:48:44.720]  call you guys to come out if it actually, we can get it on the floor this
[01:48:44.720 --> 01:48:45.720]  legislator.
[01:48:45.720 --> 01:48:49.720]  But anyone wants to call in and talk about their near arrest or the drama
[01:48:49.720 --> 01:48:54.720]  they've gotten into with video or audio or typewriting in court, I know that I
[01:48:54.720 --> 01:48:58.720]  recently was requested to close my typewriter in federal court when I was
[01:48:58.720 --> 01:49:00.720]  court-watching for Milan Luna.
[01:49:00.720 --> 01:49:05.720]  And the bailiff had let me in to use my equipment, but later they changed
[01:49:05.720 --> 01:49:06.720]  your mind.
[01:49:06.720 --> 01:49:08.720]  They said, man, no electronic devices in here.
[01:49:08.720 --> 01:49:11.720]  And I shut it very quickly and went to my paper of note-taking.
[01:49:11.720 --> 01:49:18.720]  And the bailiff told me later that the judge had personally requested that I
[01:49:18.720 --> 01:49:19.720]  not be in their typewriting.
[01:49:19.720 --> 01:49:24.720]  So it really inhibited my ability despite the fact that sometimes...
[01:49:24.720 --> 01:49:26.720]  I don't know.
[01:49:26.720 --> 01:49:33.720]  Anyway, sometimes it's hard to get recordings or even using a typewriter
[01:49:33.720 --> 01:49:34.720]  in court.
[01:49:34.720 --> 01:49:39.720]  So anyways, I hope everyone understands how important that is.
[01:49:39.720 --> 01:49:43.720]  I told one of the politicians today I had a long talk with him and hopefully
[01:49:43.720 --> 01:49:44.720]  he'll be helping me.
[01:49:44.720 --> 01:49:48.720]  He's on the Judiciary Committee and I said, there's no way we can get an
[01:49:48.720 --> 01:49:49.720]  accurate transcript.
[01:49:49.720 --> 01:49:53.720]  I was court-watching for my handle and that judge told the court reporter,
[01:49:53.720 --> 01:49:55.720]  court reporter, stop taking notes.
[01:49:55.720 --> 01:49:58.720]  And she looked at Mike and said, Mr. Handel, I told you, if you talk about
[01:49:58.720 --> 01:50:03.720]  due process violation, I'm going to throw you in jail for contempt of court.
[01:50:03.720 --> 01:50:04.720]  Understand me?
[01:50:04.720 --> 01:50:05.720]  And yelled at him.
[01:50:05.720 --> 01:50:08.720]  And then she said, court reporter, start taking notes now.
[01:50:08.720 --> 01:50:13.720]  And these judges' attitude of, hey, this is my court, you know?
[01:50:13.720 --> 01:50:15.720]  Yeah, they don't want to understand.
[01:50:15.720 --> 01:50:16.720]  It's not their court.
[01:50:16.720 --> 01:50:17.720]  It's our court.
[01:50:17.720 --> 01:50:22.720]  And we have a right to have justice at every proceeding in a court, not just
[01:50:22.720 --> 01:50:24.720]  the ones they want us to have on appeal.
[01:50:24.720 --> 01:50:27.720]  She said, one of my judges tried to kick you out.
[01:50:27.720 --> 01:50:29.720]  She said, no press in the court.
[01:50:29.720 --> 01:50:30.720]  Yeah.
[01:50:30.720 --> 01:50:34.720]  She looked right at me and said, if there is anyone from any type of press
[01:50:34.720 --> 01:50:38.720]  agency still in this courtroom when I called it to order, you will be charged
[01:50:38.720 --> 01:50:39.720]  with contempt of court.
[01:50:39.720 --> 01:50:41.720]  I just sat there and grinned at her.
[01:50:41.720 --> 01:50:42.720]  I wasn't going anywhere.
[01:50:42.720 --> 01:50:46.720]  She had already threw the Channel 8 news reporter out and wouldn't let the city
[01:50:46.720 --> 01:50:48.720]  marshals allow him back in.
[01:50:48.720 --> 01:50:51.720]  In fact, ordered them to keep him out of the courtroom.
[01:50:51.720 --> 01:50:56.720]  She wound up, that was Judge Statman, and she wound up getting herself in deep
[01:50:56.720 --> 01:51:00.720]  trouble by a district judge who called down to Evelyn McKee, the head
[01:51:00.720 --> 01:51:05.720]  administrative judge at Austin Municipal Court, and reamed her a new one.
[01:51:05.720 --> 01:51:07.720]  And that, of course, trickled down.
[01:51:07.720 --> 01:51:14.720]  Let's remind everybody that before she got in trouble, she called that judge,
[01:51:14.720 --> 01:51:19.720]  the Pills Court judge, and the letter she wrote John Salazar from YNN who was
[01:51:19.720 --> 01:51:24.720]  livid, he got thrown out, even though he had no equipment, that it was the
[01:51:24.720 --> 01:51:26.720]  bailiff who misunderstood her.
[01:51:26.720 --> 01:51:29.720]  Yeah, I talked to the city marshals down there and I explained to them,
[01:51:29.720 --> 01:51:33.720]  he says, you realize that she attempted to throw you guys under the bus for
[01:51:33.720 --> 01:51:34.720]  what she did.
[01:51:34.720 --> 01:51:35.720]  He goes, well, what do you mean?
[01:51:35.720 --> 01:51:39.720]  And I said, yeah, well, you remember when she ordered you guys to keep the
[01:51:39.720 --> 01:51:42.720]  reporter and the other media out of her courtroom?
[01:51:42.720 --> 01:51:43.720]  He goes, yeah, I remember that.
[01:51:43.720 --> 01:51:47.720]  I said, well, a district judge called down here and chewed out Evelyn McKee,
[01:51:47.720 --> 01:51:52.720]  the head judge, for that being done because that reporter called him.
[01:51:52.720 --> 01:51:57.720]  And then that came down on Statman and Statman said an e-mail of apology
[01:51:57.720 --> 01:52:02.720]  blaming you guys for misunderstanding her directives.
[01:52:02.720 --> 01:52:03.720]  Well, you know what?
[01:52:03.720 --> 01:52:06.720]  Maybe this information needs to be subpoenaed and we need to bring this
[01:52:06.720 --> 01:52:10.720]  little thing to light because I had a real hard time getting some of those
[01:52:10.720 --> 01:52:12.720]  e-mails from the newscasters.
[01:52:12.720 --> 01:52:14.720]  They didn't want to afford me that information.
[01:52:14.720 --> 01:52:17.720]  They were mad because they just didn't see this one happen again on them.
[01:52:17.720 --> 01:52:20.720]  They didn't really care about our specific cases.
[01:52:20.720 --> 01:52:23.720]  They just wanted to make sure they could be allowed in there.
[01:52:23.720 --> 01:52:27.720]  But I'll tell you what, one of his camera crew went upstairs and before he
[01:52:27.720 --> 01:52:32.720]  went upstairs after I called them in, I heard him talk to his people at YNN
[01:52:32.720 --> 01:52:35.720]  and he said, do y'all have money for bail?
[01:52:35.720 --> 01:52:38.720]  One of their reporters went upstairs knowing that they might get thrown in
[01:52:38.720 --> 01:52:41.720]  jail and I really appreciate that.
[01:52:41.720 --> 01:52:42.720]  Yeah.
[01:52:42.720 --> 01:52:46.720]  And I can say that what she did is completely illegal.
[01:52:46.720 --> 01:52:48.720]  All courtrooms are public in Texas.
[01:52:48.720 --> 01:52:51.720]  She has no authority to order the media out.
[01:52:51.720 --> 01:52:52.720]  None.
[01:52:52.720 --> 01:52:55.720]  Well, I don't know what I'm going to call this movement, but I told Elliott
[01:52:55.720 --> 01:52:56.720]  Neistat's office.
[01:52:56.720 --> 01:53:02.720]  I had a conference with him on Thursday and I said, listen, I've been scared
[01:53:02.720 --> 01:53:05.720]  for my life with doing the court watching that I've been doing and they
[01:53:05.720 --> 01:53:09.720]  looked at me funny and I explained to them my e-mail hackings and my friends
[01:53:09.720 --> 01:53:14.720]  getting kidnapped, my friends getting forcibly drugged and burning hospital.
[01:53:14.720 --> 01:53:19.720]  And it just, you know, and I explained all this to him.
[01:53:19.720 --> 01:53:23.720]  Man, I tell you, I don't know what I'm going to call the movement, but maybe
[01:53:23.720 --> 01:53:25.720]  free media and court or something like this.
[01:53:25.720 --> 01:53:27.720]  So guys, watch this.
[01:53:27.720 --> 01:53:29.720]  I'm going to need y'all to come down at some point.
[01:53:29.720 --> 01:53:33.720]  I'm going to start watching the Judiciary Committee like day and night.
[01:53:33.720 --> 01:53:38.720]  And, you know, we got, come on guys, let's use this chance because the next
[01:53:38.720 --> 01:53:41.720]  time is going to be like in two years.
[01:53:41.720 --> 01:53:43.720]  Yeah.
[01:53:43.720 --> 01:53:46.720]  Well, I wish you luck.
[01:53:46.720 --> 01:53:47.720]  Yeah.
[01:53:47.720 --> 01:53:49.720]  I'll keep you updated.
[01:53:49.720 --> 01:53:50.720]  I'd appreciate it.
[01:53:50.720 --> 01:53:51.720]  So much.
[01:53:51.720 --> 01:53:52.720]  I really appreciate it.
[01:53:52.720 --> 01:53:54.720]  And everybody out there, you take care and be careful.
[01:53:54.720 --> 01:53:57.720]  And you take your notes and court watch.
[01:53:57.720 --> 01:54:00.720]  We got to have this stuff because they're denying that it's court.
[01:54:00.720 --> 01:54:04.720]  When I talked with one of, open court of record, when I talked to one of the
[01:54:04.720 --> 01:54:07.720]  politicians, I said, this is, this is why we need this law.
[01:54:07.720 --> 01:54:10.720]  And this is exactly what the law is.
[01:54:10.720 --> 01:54:14.720]  Allowing and protecting recording audio and video and electronic devices,
[01:54:14.720 --> 01:54:19.720]  especially typewriters in court and all Texas courts, any of them.
[01:54:19.720 --> 01:54:23.720]  And he goes, well, you know, sometimes the judges have to go off the record.
[01:54:23.720 --> 01:54:25.720]  And that's important.
[01:54:25.720 --> 01:54:26.720]  I just got off the phone.
[01:54:26.720 --> 01:54:27.720]  Yeah.
[01:54:27.720 --> 01:54:31.720]  Well, you can bet when a judge is going off the record, Panky Panky is occurring.
[01:54:31.720 --> 01:54:34.720]  That's what, yeah, that's the first thing this politician says.
[01:54:34.720 --> 01:54:37.720]  Well, sometimes the judges have to go off the record in court.
[01:54:37.720 --> 01:54:40.720]  And I looked at him kind of like, oh, really?
[01:54:40.720 --> 01:54:43.720]  And yeah, sometimes they have to go off the record and that's important.
[01:54:43.720 --> 01:54:46.720]  So I guess I'm starting to get a sense of who I'm dealing with here.
[01:54:46.720 --> 01:54:47.720]  Yeah, exactly.
[01:54:47.720 --> 01:54:50.720]  Bought and paid for.
[01:54:50.720 --> 01:54:57.720]  But we'll figure out everything as we go along because this is a very neutral bill.
[01:54:57.720 --> 01:54:59.720]  This is a very neutral amendment.
[01:54:59.720 --> 01:55:03.720]  And anyone who denies it looks guilty.
[01:55:03.720 --> 01:55:06.720]  So that's why I have confidence in working with it.
[01:55:06.720 --> 01:55:07.720]  All right.
[01:55:07.720 --> 01:55:08.720]  Well, good.
[01:55:08.720 --> 01:55:09.720]  Because that's what we need.
[01:55:09.720 --> 01:55:11.720]  We need to have records.
[01:55:11.720 --> 01:55:13.720]  Every court should be a court of record.
[01:55:13.720 --> 01:55:15.720]  Every court, mandatory.
[01:55:15.720 --> 01:55:20.720]  And nothing should be allowed to be taken off the record that would not normally be
[01:55:20.720 --> 01:55:26.720]  inadmissible in a court, such as conferences over certain objections and things at the
[01:55:26.720 --> 01:55:32.720]  bench and things that occur, you know, in office meetings with the judge and chambers.
[01:55:32.720 --> 01:55:38.720]  But anything else that's going on in that courtroom should darn well be a part of the record because
[01:55:38.720 --> 01:55:42.720]  without that record, that judge believes they can do anything.
[01:55:42.720 --> 01:55:49.720]  And folks, there is a part of the Texas Constitution in Article 5 that allows any judge of any court
[01:55:49.720 --> 01:55:56.720]  to be dismissed from their position for refusal or failure to follow the laws in accordance
[01:55:56.720 --> 01:55:58.720]  with the duties of their office.
[01:55:58.720 --> 01:56:00.720]  We need to start using that.
[01:56:00.720 --> 01:56:05.720]  In fact, I'm going to be writing up the complaint for that so that it can be used to make it
[01:56:05.720 --> 01:56:07.720]  a part of the seminar material.
[01:56:07.720 --> 01:56:10.720]  So y'all hang in there and expect that as well.
[01:56:10.720 --> 01:56:11.720]  Awesome.
[01:56:11.720 --> 01:56:17.720]  Well, everyone come to Eddie's class on Sunday and hang out and everyone buy jurisdictionary
[01:56:17.720 --> 01:56:19.720]  and form a local study group of it.
[01:56:19.720 --> 01:56:25.720]  And if anybody comes to your study group and starts making trouble, just ask them to leave.
[01:56:25.720 --> 01:56:27.720]  We have a right to learn the law.
[01:56:27.720 --> 01:56:29.720]  And this stuff is no longer in Latin.
[01:56:29.720 --> 01:56:32.720]  So come on, you guys, let's get our brains together.
[01:56:32.720 --> 01:56:36.720]  It took me a year to start comprehending legalese.
[01:56:36.720 --> 01:56:40.720]  And that meant a year of sitting through jurisdictionary once a week.
[01:56:40.720 --> 01:56:44.720]  Get started now and then you won't work like a parole when you're trying to talk something
[01:56:44.720 --> 01:56:47.720]  over with your attorney or even show them court.
[01:56:47.720 --> 01:56:49.720]  So get serious about it.
[01:56:49.720 --> 01:56:54.720]  It's only like 200 or 250 split the cost with some friends, form a study group, have it
[01:56:54.720 --> 01:56:55.720]  at a coffee shop.
[01:56:55.720 --> 01:57:00.720]  I don't know where you want to have it, but it's not hard to learn, you guys.
[01:57:00.720 --> 01:57:01.720]  All right.
[01:57:01.720 --> 01:57:03.720]  Anything else, Mary?
[01:57:03.720 --> 01:57:05.720]  No, just keep on keeping on, Eddie.
[01:57:05.720 --> 01:57:06.720]  All right.
[01:57:06.720 --> 01:57:07.720]  Well, thank you.
[01:57:07.720 --> 01:57:08.720]  Yes, sir.
[01:57:08.720 --> 01:57:09.720]  All right.
[01:57:09.720 --> 01:57:10.720]  Okay.
[01:57:10.720 --> 01:57:11.720]  Good night.
[01:57:11.720 --> 01:57:15.720]  Now, all that, remember that please look me up on Facebook.
[01:57:15.720 --> 01:57:19.720]  It is tau law, T-A-O, space L-A-W.
[01:57:19.720 --> 01:57:22.720]  Send me a friend request and I'll happily add you.
[01:57:22.720 --> 01:57:24.720]  It's not a personal account.
[01:57:24.720 --> 01:57:33.720]  It is up there for the sole purpose of allowing me to express some information and ideas and
[01:57:33.720 --> 01:57:35.720]  suggestions to folks.
[01:57:35.720 --> 01:57:37.720]  Get a discussion going.
[01:57:37.720 --> 01:57:42.720]  I'm using it to promote the tau of law website that we will be launching here in the near
[01:57:42.720 --> 01:57:44.720]  future as a new endeavor.
[01:57:44.720 --> 01:57:46.720]  So please go there.
[01:57:46.720 --> 01:57:52.720]  The like page is tau of law, T-A-O, space O-F, space L-A-W.
[01:57:52.720 --> 01:57:55.720]  Go there and like that page as well.
[01:57:55.720 --> 01:58:00.720]  Subscribe to it so that I can let you know when tau of law actually launches.
[01:58:00.720 --> 01:58:02.720]  We just need your support for all that.
[01:58:02.720 --> 01:58:04.720]  We need you here at the network as well.
[01:58:04.720 --> 01:58:05.720]  So keep listening.
[01:58:05.720 --> 01:58:09.720]  Thank you all for listening to this show and our Thursday and Friday shows.
[01:58:09.720 --> 01:58:11.720]  We greatly appreciate you.
[01:58:11.720 --> 01:58:14.720]  Please help us financially whenever you're able.
[01:58:14.720 --> 01:58:19.720]  Show us that you appreciate us and what we do because we do survive and subsist on your
[01:58:19.720 --> 01:58:20.720]  support.
[01:58:20.720 --> 01:58:26.720]  Most of what we do takes up too much time to do any real regular work on a regular basis
[01:58:26.720 --> 01:58:30.720]  because of all the things we have to keep going around here to keep this information alive
[01:58:30.720 --> 01:58:31.720]  and current.
[01:58:31.720 --> 01:58:33.720]  So please be aware.
[01:58:33.720 --> 01:58:38.720]  We need you just as much as you need us and we're here for you and because of you.
[01:58:38.720 --> 01:58:40.720]  So folks, thank you so much.
[01:58:40.720 --> 01:58:42.720]  Have a good night and God bless.
[01:58:42.720 --> 01:58:56.720]  Bible for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.720 --> 01:58:57.720]  Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.720 --> 01:59:02.720]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:02.720 --> 01:59:08.720]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.720 --> 01:59:11.720]  Order your free copy today from Bible for America.
[01:59:11.720 --> 01:59:20.720]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.720 --> 01:59:26.720]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:59:26.720 --> 01:59:29.720]  charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.720 --> 01:59:32.720]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.720 --> 01:59:40.720]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.720 --> 01:59:48.720]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.