ROL_2013-01-18_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  Giving thanks isn't just good manners or something to do on Thanksgiving.
[00:06.000 --> 00:09.000]  New research suggests gratitude is actually good for your health.
[00:09.000 --> 00:11.000]  I've got your account for an Albrecht.
[00:11.000 --> 00:15.000]  Back to explain the benefits of a heartfelt thank you in a moment.
[00:15.000 --> 00:17.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:17.000 --> 00:20.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:20.000 --> 00:25.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:25.000 --> 00:27.000]  So protect your rights.
[00:27.000 --> 00:31.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.000 --> 00:33.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:33.000 --> 00:36.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[00:36.000 --> 00:40.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:40.000 --> 00:44.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[00:44.000 --> 00:45.000]  Thank you.
[00:45.000 --> 00:50.000]  They're just two simple words, but new research suggests gratitude not only improves your social life,
[00:50.000 --> 00:55.000]  it actually reduces stress and produces tangible physical and mental benefits.
[00:55.000 --> 01:00.000]  Studies looked at heart attack patients and found that those who became more appreciative of life
[01:00.000 --> 01:03.000]  actually reduced their risk of suffering another attack.
[01:03.000 --> 01:06.000]  The same went for patients with neuromuscular disorders.
[01:06.000 --> 01:12.000]  Those who jotted down five things they were grateful for slept better and had less discomfort
[01:12.000 --> 01:15.000]  than the patients who wrote down five daily hassles.
[01:15.000 --> 01:18.000]  So let's all focus on the positive and show a little more gratitude.
[01:18.000 --> 01:20.000]  Oh, and thank you for listening.
[01:20.000 --> 01:22.000]  I really appreciate it.
[01:22.000 --> 01:27.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:32.000 --> 01:38.000]  A decade ago automobile crashes were the leading cause of death by injury in America,
[01:38.000 --> 01:43.000]  but in recent years car accidents have been surpassed by a much more disturbing cause of death.
[01:43.000 --> 01:47.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you what it is in a moment.
[01:47.000 --> 01:49.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:49.000 --> 01:53.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:53.000 --> 01:58.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:58.000 --> 02:00.000]  So protect your rights.
[02:00.000 --> 02:03.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:03.000 --> 02:06.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:06.000 --> 02:09.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[02:09.000 --> 02:13.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:13.000 --> 02:15.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.000 --> 02:20.000]  Here's some bad news we haven't seen since the Great Recession.
[02:20.000 --> 02:24.000]  Today suicide takes more American lives than any other injury.
[02:24.000 --> 02:28.000]  Car accidents were the leading cause of death until 2009.
[02:28.000 --> 02:32.000]  That year nearly 40,000 Americans committed suicide,
[02:32.000 --> 02:35.000]  making it the leading cause of injury-related death.
[02:35.000 --> 02:40.000]  While suicides increased 15% that decade, deaths from poisoning more than doubled.
[02:40.000 --> 02:45.000]  Researchers believe many of those prescription drug overdoses may be intentional,
[02:45.000 --> 02:48.000]  which would raise the suicide rate even higher.
[02:48.000 --> 02:50.000]  If you're feeling down, reach out for help.
[02:50.000 --> 02:54.000]  There are more resources available today than ever before.
[02:54.000 --> 03:11.000]  I'm Dr. Kjavren Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[03:24.000 --> 03:52.000]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rula Radio.
[03:52.000 --> 03:59.000]  It's just me tonight, and when I was eight, I had bad traits.
[03:59.000 --> 04:04.000]  And then a puberty started and it caused brain damage.
[04:04.000 --> 04:11.000]  And like most other men who go through puberty and all those hormones cause brain damage,
[04:11.000 --> 04:13.000]  I never got over it.
[04:13.000 --> 04:17.000]  That's why all us guys are so wacko.
[04:17.000 --> 04:20.000]  But anyway, today I wanted to start out.
[04:20.000 --> 04:22.000]  The phone line is going to be open all night,
[04:22.000 --> 04:30.000]  but I have been working on these remedies, these tools.
[04:30.000 --> 04:32.000]  You folks have been listening.
[04:32.000 --> 04:35.000]  You've heard me talk about these for quite a while,
[04:35.000 --> 04:40.000]  and I'm really frustrated that I don't have them up and working already.
[04:40.000 --> 04:47.000]  But on the one hand, the pieces are coming together well.
[04:47.000 --> 04:51.000]  I just don't quite have them implemented yet.
[04:51.000 --> 05:00.000]  I have the American Bar Association model standards in a, what I call a normal format,
[05:00.000 --> 05:06.000]  in a format where you can go in and you go to a outline,
[05:06.000 --> 05:15.000]  a section that breaks the standards up into a number of categories.
[05:15.000 --> 05:19.000]  And then from those categories to subcategories,
[05:19.000 --> 05:28.000]  and within four jumps, you can get to any grievance, any particular standard.
[05:28.000 --> 05:36.000]  And in putting all this together, some important things are beginning to emerge.
[05:36.000 --> 05:43.000]  I'm a researcher, and as with most other legal researchers I talk to,
[05:43.000 --> 05:51.000]  there is one thing we almost never talk about that bothers all of us,
[05:51.000 --> 05:55.000]  especially if we're researchers and we're not lawyers.
[05:55.000 --> 06:01.000]  And I used to have the notion that this wasn't a concern for lawyers,
[06:01.000 --> 06:07.000]  but as I learn more, I find out it's probably a bigger concern for lawyers
[06:07.000 --> 06:11.000]  than it is for us procé researchers.
[06:11.000 --> 06:16.000]  And what I'm talking about is missing something.
[06:16.000 --> 06:22.000]  The law is a hopelessly convoluted jumble,
[06:22.000 --> 06:33.000]  and with every legislature that comes in and feels like they have to write new law, it gets worse.
[06:33.000 --> 06:48.000]  And what's emerging from the tools that we're building is the tool will wind up as a way to allow you to go to an issue
[06:48.000 --> 06:55.000]  without having to be worried about having missed some really important piece.
[06:55.000 --> 07:07.000]  And by structuring the code in questionnaires, in a questionnaire format, we can mind through the code quickly.
[07:07.000 --> 07:12.000]  And if we do a job right in putting these pieces together,
[07:12.000 --> 07:24.000]  someone can go through a set of questions and go to a particular issue with confidence that they haven't missed anything.
[07:24.000 --> 07:34.000]  This was actually one of the terms of the idea that got all of this started.
[07:34.000 --> 07:45.000]  You know, I do this show and I have people calling in with all kinds of interesting ideas and maneuvers and things we can do.
[07:45.000 --> 07:52.000]  And somebody would call in with a really great idea and I think it's wonderful and we'll talk about it on the show.
[07:52.000 --> 08:01.000]  Then next week somebody will call in with something else and that will be great, wonderful, and I forget the first one.
[08:01.000 --> 08:15.000]  Over the one three, four, five, six, seven weeks earlier, doing this show and having access to callers the way we do is a tremendous resource.
[08:15.000 --> 08:32.000]  And what really got me started on this particular procedure was the idea that I'm gaining access to all this really valuable and workable information,
[08:32.000 --> 08:36.000]  but I'm not able to keep it.
[08:36.000 --> 08:42.000]  So the tool was designed for that and so far it's working really well.
[08:42.000 --> 08:49.000]  I have a very exhaustive structure on due process.
[08:49.000 --> 08:58.000]  I haven't put together what I don't have is it integrated into a backside database.
[08:58.000 --> 09:10.000]  You can go through my criminal evaluation and it will walk through the code and go to every element of due process.
[09:10.000 --> 09:18.000]  There is an issue I don't have in there and that's one that goes to an analysis of each criminal accusation,
[09:18.000 --> 09:26.000]  but that's not a terribly complex or difficult piece to add to it once we get it up and run it.
[09:26.000 --> 09:36.000]  But the criminal part will give a really good analysis of your criminal situation, most people who get arrested.
[09:36.000 --> 09:41.000]  They go to jail and have no clue as to what to do.
[09:41.000 --> 09:45.000]  We sit out here and we talk about it and intellectualize about it,
[09:45.000 --> 09:51.000]  but when you actually wind up in the situation, the reality is quite a bit different.
[09:51.000 --> 10:01.000]  So having been there myself, I'm a lot more understanding and tolerant of people who are frustrated by being in these situations
[10:01.000 --> 10:10.000]  and they have some smart mouth know-it-all radio commentator tell on them what they should have done and ought to have done.
[10:10.000 --> 10:22.000]  It's got to be frustrating because when you're in the situation, it's not so easy to do all of this stuff as we make it sound when we're sitting out here on the outside.
[10:22.000 --> 10:28.000]  It's not so easy to understand all of the ramifications of what's going on.
[10:28.000 --> 10:37.000]  So if we have a good analysis tool, we can go through the tool and be confident that we haven't missed anything really important.
[10:37.000 --> 10:51.000]  And when we craft a response to an issue, that is always something that grinds on all of us that do research.
[10:51.000 --> 10:58.000]  We can put together the documentation and the arguments and gather the case law and support of the arguments,
[10:58.000 --> 11:10.000]  but every time I give someone a document, there's always this little nagging question in the back of my mind saying,
[11:10.000 --> 11:25.000]  OK, smart guy, what really basic important thing did you miss? And I find out that lawyers have the same questions and concerns.
[11:25.000 --> 11:35.000]  They probably have those questions and concerns more than we do because we're just ignorant old pro says what I expected, no anything.
[11:35.000 --> 11:48.000]  Lawyers are learning counsel and they are expected to know they have a duty under the bar association standards to know.
[11:48.000 --> 12:02.000]  It's a grievable offense to bring an issue before the court and argue a position that has already been well adjudicated.
[12:02.000 --> 12:17.000]  And how do you know? Lawyers get out of law school and they teach them a lot about law, but they don't teach them much about the practice of law.
[12:17.000 --> 12:31.000]  And I've been researching for 30 years now. And when I get an issue that I haven't handled before, it is really tough finding case law on point.
[12:31.000 --> 12:46.000]  And even once you want to find case law on point, there is no repository out there that will tell you if you have all the relevant case law on point.
[12:46.000 --> 13:12.000]  The law is a jumble's mess and it has been for a very long time, but technology has reached a point that it gives us the tools to wade through some of that mess and sort it out and create a way of dealing with law that will become very consistent.
[13:12.000 --> 13:31.000]  And that's part of what's taken longer in structuring this tool is to get it structured so that it is very consistent and usable and robust, portable and expandable.
[13:31.000 --> 13:43.000]  There are some parameters, but we're getting real close. I'm getting the pieces put together. One of the things I want to talk about and I probably used up a break.
[13:43.000 --> 14:04.000]  After we come back from the next break, I'll start going through the free forensic analysis tool that I'm putting up on the web. I've got part of it on remedies in real estate and I will pour it in when I'm working on now.
[14:04.000 --> 14:27.000]  I have a lot more of it done, but I want to go through part of it because for a couple of reasons. One of them is that I was putting this front in together for people who don't know anything about not only the real estate issue, but about law and how to defend themselves.
[14:27.000 --> 14:50.000]  I was trying to put together a set of basic wisdom, pieces of wisdom, tools that they can use as benchmarks to help lead them in how to deal with these issues that are put together by children.
[14:50.000 --> 15:17.000]  Frankly, I would like to get my listeners' opinions, input, and let me know what I've missed. Let me know what questions I leave in the mind of my listener that I haven't addressed because if I bring up something, talk about an issue.
[15:17.000 --> 15:27.000]  And in what I'm talking about, I create questions in the mind of my listener.
[15:27.000 --> 15:48.000]  If I don't immediately answer that question or do something to give the listener reason to believe that I'm very well aware of the question that I've created and intend to answer it, then I've lost my listener. You're gone.
[15:48.000 --> 16:01.000]  You're back there trying to figure out what you missed or what I left out and you don't hear anything else I say and then it winds up that you get further behind and more confused and finally just shut me off altogether.
[16:01.000 --> 16:14.000]  And you can probably tell from a lot of times when we go to a caller, I've already done that to the caller so I've put him completely asleep and I don't even answer the phone when you get to him.
[16:14.000 --> 16:40.000]  So I know that can be a problem and I would like, when I go through this after the next break, to call in and tell me where I hit the mark, where I missed the mark, what I need to add to this because we want to create as comprehensive and robust a tool as we possibly can.
[16:40.000 --> 16:59.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig with our radio. This is our Friday night, January the 18th, 2013 show. I called in number 5126461984. We'll be right back.
[17:10.000 --> 17:33.000]  PMO really ain't the way to go. There's a better way I've seen. It's called Tangierine. And we're all drinking Tangierine, Tangierine, Tangierine.
[17:33.000 --> 17:40.000]  We're all drinking Tangierine, Tangierine, Tangierine.
[17:40.000 --> 17:57.000]  Order Beyond Tangierine and other Greg Young Jevity products at LogosRadioNetwork.com by clicking on the Tangierine banner. Sign up as a preferred customer for wholesale prices or become a distributor and support LogosRadioNetwork.com. So what do you say, Elvis?
[17:57.000 --> 18:04.000]  Tangierine. Tangierine Watch.
[18:28.000 --> 18:49.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 19:00.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:19.000 --> 19:35.000]  I'm standing like it's out of control On the edge of a hole inside a deep dark dome
[19:35.000 --> 19:50.000]  I'm always on the lookout for something that suits my soul
[19:50.000 --> 20:14.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig, rule of law radio. And we were going to go to Kathy in Arizona, but I think she crashed and burned for the moment.
[20:14.000 --> 20:24.000]  I have Paul from Wisconsin. I guess I should go to his first because Kathy's question was similar. Hello, Paul.
[20:24.000 --> 20:27.000]  How are you doing, Randy?
[20:27.000 --> 20:36.000]  Oh, wait a minute. Wait a minute. Kathy just came back on and sees a girl and you're a chomp.
[20:36.000 --> 20:44.000]  This is the guy who calls himself a cowboy and he pulls cow udders in Wisconsin.
[20:44.000 --> 20:56.000]  Taxing would be just incensed over him calling himself a cowboy. What would you call a tip puller in Wisconsin?
[20:56.000 --> 20:58.000]  I don't know if you're talking.
[20:58.000 --> 21:07.000]  He's picking on Paul this evening. Hang on, Paul. Let me take Kathy. I think she's a first time caller. But it's similar to yours.
[21:07.000 --> 21:11.000]  As soon as I get done with Kathy, I'll come back to you.
[21:11.000 --> 21:17.000]  Hello, Miss Kathy. I see you're back up. I wanted to take you before your line dropped off again.
[21:17.000 --> 21:20.000]  Okay. Can you hear me?
[21:20.000 --> 21:22.000]  Yes, ma'am, I can.
[21:22.000 --> 21:29.000]  Okay. My husband listens to your show and he loves it and he keeps telling me about you.
[21:29.000 --> 21:42.000]  I had a situation happen to me at Cole's store and my husband wanted me to talk to you about running the routine on the prosecutor for something that he failed to do.
[21:42.000 --> 21:47.000]  Do you want me to tell you what happened to me or I don't really know what I'm supposed to do?
[21:47.000 --> 21:50.000]  Yes. Yeah, give me as brief as you can.
[21:50.000 --> 21:58.000]  Yeah. I was at Cole's and I was buying some bedding. I bought $180 worth of bedding. I bought bed sheets and a blanket.
[21:58.000 --> 22:12.000]  What I didn't realize is one of the blankets I had decided again was at the bottom of the cart and I wasn't paying attention and I walked out of the store with a blanket I thought I had decided again.
[22:12.000 --> 22:23.000]  The security guy stopped me outside and said, ma'am, you have some unpaid merchandise in the Cole's basket. I don't know if you've ever been to Cole's. They have, like, black baskets.
[22:23.000 --> 22:34.000]  And I picked up the big comforter that was on top and the sheets and sure enough, there was that blanket down there.
[22:34.000 --> 22:42.000]  And so he took me back into the security room and, you know, was talking to me.
[22:42.000 --> 22:50.000]  At first, he must have had me confused with someone else. He was real confrontational. He was telling me he'd been watching me for a long time.
[22:50.000 --> 22:57.000]  He knew what car I drove and I just looked at him like he was crazy and he said, I'm going to show you your car in the parking lot.
[22:57.000 --> 23:08.000]  And then he went to the parking lot and couldn't find the car he thought I had. And then he kind of started to treat me a little bit different and realized he had me confused with, I think, someone else.
[23:08.000 --> 23:17.000]  And then he listened to my story and wasn't so hostile and just that, you know, I didn't really mean to, I forgot the blanket was there.
[23:17.000 --> 23:31.000]  And then he's looking at the surveillance tape and I hear him go outside talking to another security person right outside the security office door and I hear him say we can't use the tape.
[23:31.000 --> 23:38.000]  Then he comes back in and he says he's going to cancel the police call. So he calls and he cancels the police call.
[23:38.000 --> 23:53.000]  But this batch person says the police is already in your parking lot. So the police comes in. Supposedly the police officer looks at the security tape where supposedly I put the blanket under my purse, which I guess I probably did.
[23:53.000 --> 23:59.000]  I mean, I don't remember, you know, I thought I decided against it, but apparently I didn't.
[23:59.000 --> 24:10.000]  And so they arrest me. She takes me out. She fingerprints me outside. And then she gives me a traffic.
[24:10.000 --> 24:22.000]  She fingerprinted me out at the police car and then she gave me an Arizona traffic ticket and complaint with the court date.
[24:22.000 --> 24:33.000]  So I went to that and I was at the arraignment and the only thing they asked me to plead, I pled not guilty.
[24:33.000 --> 24:44.000]  They asked me if I wanted a public defender. I said yes. They gave me one. Then we went to a pretrial hearing and I was expecting to receive disclosure.
[24:44.000 --> 24:52.000]  Remember, I told you I heard the security guy say he couldn't use the surveillance tape. I wasn't sure why he said that.
[24:52.000 --> 24:57.000]  But at the preliminary hearing, there was no surveillance tape.
[24:57.000 --> 25:08.000]  And so I thought that was a little interesting. There was just a police report where the police is mentioning seeing the surveillance tape.
[25:08.000 --> 25:20.000]  So anyway, the public defender just says that there is no surveillance tape, but one might be coming later.
[25:20.000 --> 25:33.000]  So I'm a little bit frustrated with this public defender because when I try to talk to him, he acts like all he wants me to do is show up five minutes before we go to trial.
[25:33.000 --> 25:40.000]  And then he's perfectly comfortable proceeding in trial.
[25:40.000 --> 25:45.000]  And he basically said that to me and I keep saying, well, don't we need to strategize?
[25:45.000 --> 25:52.000]  Don't we need to hear my side of the story? Don't we need to discuss any possible witnesses about any kind of argument or strategy?
[25:52.000 --> 26:00.000]  And he says, no, he's perfectly comfortable just going into trial without any preparation.
[26:00.000 --> 26:10.000]  I sent a certified letter requesting, you know, any disclosure that they might have other than the police report.
[26:10.000 --> 26:18.000]  And I requested, or I should say my husband asked for some other things that, you know, your shows kind of taught him to ask.
[26:18.000 --> 26:23.000]  And basically, I was ignored.
[26:23.000 --> 26:30.000]  Well, anyways, we go just before we're supposed to go to trial.
[26:30.000 --> 26:36.000]  There is like a call, some kind of call, calendar call.
[26:36.000 --> 26:42.000]  And my husband and I decided that we weren't happy with this public defender.
[26:42.000 --> 26:45.000]  So we asked for a new lawyer at the calendar call.
[26:45.000 --> 26:49.000]  And that ruffled quite a few feathers.
[26:49.000 --> 26:52.000]  Are you still there, Randy?
[26:52.000 --> 26:58.000]  Yeah, I'm here. I have, if I get background noise, it dampens down your voice.
[26:58.000 --> 27:01.000]  So I keep my mic muted.
[27:01.000 --> 27:03.000]  Yeah, I'm still here. Go ahead.
[27:03.000 --> 27:13.000]  So anyway, at the calendar call, we asked for a new attorney and I explained to the judge why and basically just the fact that he doesn't return my call.
[27:13.000 --> 27:18.000]  He doesn't sit down and, you know, give me an advice on how to proceed.
[27:18.000 --> 27:21.000]  He's never even heard my side of the story.
[27:21.000 --> 27:28.000]  I've asked for disclosure and he just keeps telling me that it's not here yet.
[27:28.000 --> 27:34.000]  And I tell the judge, I don't want to show up for court.
[27:34.000 --> 27:40.000]  This was on December 11th, I believe, and our trial date was on December 14th.
[27:40.000 --> 27:46.000]  And I still didn't know if there was a surveillance tape and what was on it.
[27:46.000 --> 27:53.000]  Okay, we need to move on. Did he appoint you a new counsel?
[27:53.000 --> 28:06.000]  No, he refused because he said that the attorney probably had strategy that I was unaware of and he wanted me to go into a room with the public defender and find out what the public defender strategy was.
[28:06.000 --> 28:08.000]  Okay, did you do that?
[28:08.000 --> 28:10.000]  Yeah.
[28:10.000 --> 28:11.000]  And basically...
[28:11.000 --> 28:12.000]  What did he say?
[28:12.000 --> 28:23.000]  He said his strategy was for us just to proceed with trial on the 14th and see if the surveillance tape showed up.
[28:23.000 --> 28:28.000]  And then we would reveal it just before we went to trial.
[28:28.000 --> 28:37.000]  And I just thought that the rules of discovery were to give me some more time.
[28:37.000 --> 28:40.000]  Okay, tell you what you do.
[28:40.000 --> 28:55.000]  Call your lawyer and say, look, if you don't get that surveillance tape and get it quickly, I'm going to bar grieve you every other day until you get it.
[28:55.000 --> 28:56.000]  Okay.
[28:56.000 --> 29:00.000]  This is one of the things I was going to talk about tonight.
[29:00.000 --> 29:07.000]  Bar grievances for lawyers is a really, really big deal.
[29:07.000 --> 29:24.000]  If you file a bar grievance against your lawyer and end the American Bar Association model standards, it is a grievable offense for a lawyer not to communicate with his client.
[29:24.000 --> 29:27.000]  And they all don't communicate with the client.
[29:27.000 --> 29:38.000]  So if you file a bar grievance against your lawyer, the state bar will get that grievance and they will throw it in the trash.
[29:38.000 --> 29:39.000]  And that's a good thing.
[29:39.000 --> 29:50.000]  And when we come back from break, I'll explain why that's a good thing and how you can have a whole lot of fun and probably get them to dismiss this case just to keep you from putting your lawyer out of business.
[29:50.000 --> 29:57.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Debra Stephens, Andy Craig with our radio, a call in number 512-646-1984.
[29:57.000 --> 29:59.000]  We'll be right back.
[29:59.000 --> 30:05.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[30:05.000 --> 30:07.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:07.000 --> 30:12.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:12.000 --> 30:18.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives and thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[30:18.000 --> 30:20.000]  This is not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:20.000 --> 30:21.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:21.000 --> 30:22.000]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[30:22.000 --> 30:23.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:23.000 --> 30:24.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:24.000 --> 30:25.000]  We're Americans.
[30:25.000 --> 30:27.000]  And we deserve the truth.
[30:27.000 --> 30:56.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:57.000 --> 31:07.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy.
[31:07.000 --> 31:10.000]  And neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[31:10.000 --> 31:13.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[31:13.000 --> 31:14.000]  Brave New Books?
[31:14.000 --> 31:15.000]  Yes.
[31:15.000 --> 31:21.000]  Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul and G. Edward Griffin.
[31:21.000 --> 31:25.000]  They even stock inner food, Burkey products and Calvin Soaps.
[31:25.000 --> 31:27.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[31:27.000 --> 31:29.000]  Go check it out for yourself.
[31:29.000 --> 31:33.000]  It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street just south of UT.
[31:33.000 --> 31:34.000]  Oh, by UT?
[31:34.000 --> 31:36.000]  There's never anywhere to park down there.
[31:36.000 --> 31:44.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[31:44.000 --> 31:48.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[31:48.000 --> 31:56.000]  Stay through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays, so give them a call at 512-480-2503,
[31:56.000 --> 32:00.000]  or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[32:00.000 --> 32:11.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at Logos Radio Network.com.
[32:11.000 --> 32:20.000]  Yeah, I got a warrant, and I'm going to solve them.
[32:20.000 --> 32:25.000]  To the government them, prosecute them.
[32:25.000 --> 32:28.000]  Okay.
[32:28.000 --> 32:31.000]  All set.
[32:31.000 --> 32:55.000]  Okay, we are back.
[32:55.000 --> 32:57.000]  Okay, we are back.
[32:57.000 --> 33:03.000]  Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig with Rule of Law Radio, and I did want to mention our fundraiser.
[33:03.000 --> 33:05.000]  It's still going on.
[33:05.000 --> 33:18.000]  We still have the AR-15 up for, not a prize, but not a raffle.
[33:18.000 --> 33:23.000]  But for every $20 donation, you get a, oh, it's a giveaway.
[33:23.000 --> 33:24.000]  That's right.
[33:24.000 --> 33:26.000]  I want to make sure I say this right.
[33:26.000 --> 33:36.000]  As a giveaway for whoever's name gets pulled out of the hat for every $20, you'll get a name in the hat,
[33:36.000 --> 33:42.000]  and you'll get a brand new Rock River AR-15.
[33:42.000 --> 33:52.000]  We also have gift certificates from Perium Health Food Products and several other offers.
[33:52.000 --> 33:56.000]  You can look at Logos Radio Network.com.
[33:56.000 --> 34:02.000]  They're all on the front of, you know, on the homepage.
[34:02.000 --> 34:11.000]  And Debra was telling me something about HTML where you could pull these down and drop them on your own homepage or personal page or whatever,
[34:11.000 --> 34:17.000]  but I didn't get to figure out what she was talking about, so she'll probably beat me up tomorrow.
[34:17.000 --> 34:23.000]  Anyway, back to our callers, back to Kathy in Arizona.
[34:23.000 --> 34:27.000]  Okay, Kathy, we were talking about bar grievance.
[34:27.000 --> 34:35.000]  If you follow bar grievance against your lawyer, the state bar will get that grievance and throw it in the trash.
[34:35.000 --> 34:37.000]  It doesn't matter what you grieve them for.
[34:37.000 --> 34:40.000]  It doesn't matter if it's valid, invalid.
[34:40.000 --> 34:42.000]  They throw it in the trash.
[34:42.000 --> 34:45.000]  And that's a good thing.
[34:45.000 --> 34:54.000]  The reason that's a good thing is their insurance carrier knows full well they'll throw it in the trash.
[34:54.000 --> 34:58.000]  So how are they to gauge their level of risk?
[34:58.000 --> 35:00.000]  By valid grievances?
[35:00.000 --> 35:02.000]  Heck, they throw them all in the trash.
[35:02.000 --> 35:12.000]  By the numbers, one by there are seven underwriters of malpractice insurance in the country that I know of.
[35:12.000 --> 35:18.000]  All of them are underwritten by lawyers of London. All of them have the same criteria.
[35:18.000 --> 35:23.000]  One bar grievance, your first year of practice, they'll cancel immediately.
[35:23.000 --> 35:27.000]  Two bar grievances, any one year of practice, they'll cancel.
[35:27.000 --> 35:31.000]  Three, they'll cancel your law firm's malpractice insurance.
[35:31.000 --> 35:36.000]  I've had lawyers complain to me that that is patently unfair.
[35:36.000 --> 35:40.000]  Well, sorry, Bubba, life is tough.
[35:40.000 --> 35:44.000]  Lawyers do not grieve other lawyers.
[35:44.000 --> 35:48.000]  They don't grieve other lawyers because they don't want to be grieved back,
[35:48.000 --> 35:53.000]  because they start out paying between 20 and 30,000 a year for malpractice insurance.
[35:53.000 --> 35:56.000]  One grievance and it doubles.
[35:56.000 --> 35:59.000]  So it was dingin' good.
[35:59.000 --> 36:08.000]  The last time I was charged in Austin when a DPS officer smashed me into a wall and broke a tooth,
[36:08.000 --> 36:14.000]  when I asked him what part of I do not want to talk to you, do you not understand.
[36:14.000 --> 36:18.000]  Then they prosecuted me to cover up what he did.
[36:18.000 --> 36:24.000]  I threatened, I told my, I think they appointed me an attorney and I didn't ask for one,
[36:24.000 --> 36:26.000]  but they appointed me one.
[36:26.000 --> 36:32.000]  And I told him that I had a motion in before the court with 21 due process violations in it.
[36:32.000 --> 36:37.000]  You will adequately adjudicate every single one of those.
[36:37.000 --> 36:41.000]  You failed to adequately adjudicate a single one.
[36:41.000 --> 36:45.000]  And I'll bar grieve you for each one.
[36:45.000 --> 36:48.000]  And they almost gave him apoplexy.
[36:48.000 --> 36:55.000]  Mr. Kelton, you would grieve me in a heartbeat.
[36:55.000 --> 37:02.000]  The judge dismissed the case to protect my lawyer from me.
[37:02.000 --> 37:07.000]  You have to understand it's not about justice.
[37:07.000 --> 37:10.000]  It's not about right or wrong.
[37:10.000 --> 37:13.000]  None of these guys care.
[37:13.000 --> 37:15.000]  It's all about the money.
[37:15.000 --> 37:18.000]  It's always all about the money.
[37:18.000 --> 37:26.000]  You will never win your case because you have the law and the facts on your side to think so is naive.
[37:26.000 --> 37:32.000]  You will win your case. You have the politics on your side.
[37:32.000 --> 37:39.000]  And what bar grievances will do is get you lots and lots of politics.
[37:39.000 --> 37:44.000]  So you talk to your court appointed counsel.
[37:44.000 --> 37:47.000]  The last thing you want to do is get rid of it.
[37:47.000 --> 37:49.000]  Say I'm stuck with you.
[37:49.000 --> 37:55.000]  You're going to do your job or I will grieve you right out of business.
[37:55.000 --> 38:12.000]  If he thinks you're going to bar grieve him, then he will run to the judge and run to the prosecutor and tell him that he has an unruly client that he cannot control.
[38:12.000 --> 38:20.000]  And the client is threatening me with bar grievances, which will effectively put me out of business.
[38:20.000 --> 38:24.000]  So you guys got to help me out here.
[38:24.000 --> 38:36.000]  They are not going to want their buddy lawyer to have to get his malpractice insurance doubled because he wound up getting appointed to represent the pro say from hell.
[38:36.000 --> 38:40.000]  And that's what we'll teach you how to be.
[38:40.000 --> 38:43.000]  This is a defense that we have.
[38:43.000 --> 38:45.000]  The courts are corrupt.
[38:45.000 --> 38:48.000]  They are absolutely corrupt.
[38:48.000 --> 38:51.000]  They absolutely don't care if you're guilty or innocent.
[38:51.000 --> 38:54.000]  All they want is you on probation.
[38:54.000 --> 38:57.000]  Or they want to collect the fee from you.
[38:57.000 --> 39:02.000]  If it's a classic misdemeanor like this is, they just want to collect a little fee.
[39:02.000 --> 39:06.000]  If it's higher level, then they want your own probation.
[39:06.000 --> 39:13.000]  The reason they want you on probation is the probation fee goes to the county.
[39:13.000 --> 39:21.000]  A fine that they assess you, the large portion of that will go to the state general fund.
[39:21.000 --> 39:28.000]  So what they'll normally do is charge you as much in probation fees as they think you can stand.
[39:28.000 --> 39:36.000]  If you have a excess income, then they'll take that away from you and in terms of a fine.
[39:36.000 --> 39:39.000]  I live in a small county in North Texas.
[39:39.000 --> 39:51.000]  I went through the records several years ago and in 1653 felony accusations, one person pled not guilty.
[39:51.000 --> 39:53.000]  Everybody takes the deal.
[39:53.000 --> 39:58.000]  Everything is set up to force you to take the deal.
[39:58.000 --> 40:03.000]  The one guy who didn't take the deal went to court.
[40:03.000 --> 40:04.000]  They found it guilty.
[40:04.000 --> 40:05.000]  He had it overturned on appeal.
[40:05.000 --> 40:06.000]  They had one trial.
[40:06.000 --> 40:08.000]  They couldn't get it right.
[40:08.000 --> 40:10.000]  But everybody took the deal.
[40:10.000 --> 40:18.000]  There were six fines in 1653 felony cases.
[40:18.000 --> 40:23.000]  What was going on, that was my question.
[40:23.000 --> 40:33.000]  And what my research showed is to put them all on probation and charge as much in probation fees as the person could stand so that the money stayed in the county.
[40:33.000 --> 40:35.000]  It's all about the money.
[40:35.000 --> 40:40.000]  So you change the dynamics a little bit.
[40:40.000 --> 40:44.000]  You will not win your case because you have the law and the facts on your side.
[40:44.000 --> 40:48.000]  You will win your case if you have the politics on your side.
[40:48.000 --> 40:56.000]  And bar grievance will buy you a lot of politics, criminal complaints, judicial conduct complaints.
[40:56.000 --> 41:00.000]  These will buy you a lot of politics.
[41:00.000 --> 41:05.000]  Do we have a right, Randy, to...
[41:05.000 --> 41:18.000]  Because according to a statute that we've researched, the prosecutor had to have disclosure to me at the preliminary hearing which he failed to do.
[41:18.000 --> 41:21.000]  He didn't order it till the day before my trial date.
[41:21.000 --> 41:23.000]  He did not order the...
[41:23.000 --> 41:25.000]  Okay, okay, hold on.
[41:25.000 --> 41:27.000]  For the trial.
[41:27.000 --> 41:33.000]  Okay, go to bargrievance.net.
[41:33.000 --> 41:42.000]  And click on the link to the American Bar Association Standards for the Prosecutorial Function.
[41:42.000 --> 41:49.000]  Now, what you have here is a municipal prosecutor.
[41:49.000 --> 42:00.000]  This... wait a minute. Were you charged in violating a city ordinance or were you charged before justice of the peace?
[42:00.000 --> 42:04.000]  I don't know. I just went to... I just...
[42:04.000 --> 42:09.000]  What kind of judge did you... what kind of judge did you go before?
[42:09.000 --> 42:13.000]  Just a municipal judge.
[42:13.000 --> 42:17.000]  Okay, municipal and it's a city. Okay, wonderful.
[42:17.000 --> 42:23.000]  The municipal judge, he does this on the side. He practices law.
[42:23.000 --> 42:31.000]  When he's not being a municipal judge, the municipal prosecutor also practices law.
[42:31.000 --> 42:35.000]  He'll have a law practice on it as a municipal thing.
[42:35.000 --> 42:37.000]  So, bargrieve him.
[42:37.000 --> 42:42.000]  You bargrieve that prosecutor and he will have a connection.
[42:42.000 --> 42:53.000]  And if he says one word to you or to the court about you bargrieving him, you bargrieve him for that.
[42:53.000 --> 42:59.000]  The problem... the problem with it is supposed to keep the mouth shut.
[42:59.000 --> 43:05.000]  When you file a grievance against a lawyer, the bar says,
[43:05.000 --> 43:18.000]  you being an officer of the court and learning council, for you to address this with the filer would be an imposition.
[43:18.000 --> 43:23.000]  And it would border on tampering with the witness obstruction of justice.
[43:23.000 --> 43:28.000]  So, you are not to talk to the complainant about it. You're to deal with us.
[43:28.000 --> 43:32.000]  We'll talk to the complainant. We'll handle this issue.
[43:32.000 --> 43:36.000]  So, they're forbidden to talk to you about it.
[43:36.000 --> 43:40.000]  You get to clobber them and they can't even complain about it.
[43:40.000 --> 43:43.000]  Oh, it's glorious. It's great fun.
[43:43.000 --> 43:46.000]  Hang on. This is Randy Kelton, Deb. Steve and Daddy Craig.
[43:46.000 --> 43:54.000]  We have our radio. I call it number 5126461984. We'll be right back.
[43:54.000 --> 44:01.000]  The Oakland City bombing. Top 10 reasons to question the official story.
[44:01.000 --> 44:05.000]  Reason number 2. Why was the ATF AWOL?
[44:05.000 --> 44:16.000]  Paramedic Tiffany Bible, who was on the scene within 5 minutes, has stated in an affidavit that agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms told her that they were not in the office that morning.
[44:16.000 --> 44:27.000]  D&T Catherine Mallet also overheard one agent say to another, close, is that why we got the page to not come in today, in quote.
[44:27.000 --> 44:34.000]  Bruce Shaw, as interviewed on KS4RTV, was also told by ATF agents that they had been paid to not come into work.
[44:34.000 --> 44:41.000]  The ATF initially denied these claims and now variously claim that one of their agents was in a free-falling elevator which has been disproven,
[44:41.000 --> 44:46.000]  or that they had been in an all-night stick out, or that they had been in a golf tournament.
[44:46.000 --> 44:55.000]  As they try to sort out their lies, all we want to know is, did the ATF receive a warning, and if so, why did they not pass it on to others and memorials?
[44:55.000 --> 45:22.000]  For more information, go to OCCbombandTruth.com.
[45:26.000 --> 45:28.000]  And now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 46:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.000 --> 46:37.000]  Okay, we are back.
[46:37.000 --> 46:41.000]  Brandy Kelton, David Steven, Denny Craig, Rule of Law Radio.
[46:41.000 --> 46:47.000]  And we're talking to Kathy and Arizona about fighting bar grievances.
[46:47.000 --> 46:59.000]  Now, what most people don't know is you can grieve the prosecutor just as quickly as you can grieve your defense counsel.
[46:59.000 --> 47:18.000]  And I have the, if you'll go to bargrevance.net and click on the link for the, go back to the beginning, American Bar Association Standards for the Prosecutoral Function.
[47:18.000 --> 47:26.000]  Click that and then go to General Standards and Function.
[47:26.000 --> 47:29.000]  General Function is a prosecutor's office.
[47:29.000 --> 47:35.000]  Did the prosecutor conduct himself in a manner that affected the validity of the prosecution conducted?
[47:35.000 --> 47:37.000]  Absolutely did.
[47:37.000 --> 48:01.000]  We're failing to provide production of exculpatory evidence and that particular issue, exculpatory evidence in the form of the security camera, is covered in 3-3.11, one which I remember always.
[48:01.000 --> 48:10.000]  Prosecuting attorney refrains for pursuing evidence solely because that evidence may show the innocence of the accused and mitigate the guilt of the accused.
[48:10.000 --> 48:12.000]  That is unethical conduct.
[48:12.000 --> 48:16.000]  And he thought of our grievance against it.
[48:16.000 --> 48:32.000]  Did the prosecutor fail or refuse to prosecute crime within the prosecutor's jurisdiction? Did the prosecutor, while acting as administrative justice advocate and an officer of the court, exercise sound discretion in the performance of his or her function?
[48:32.000 --> 48:34.000]  We can always say they didn't do that.
[48:34.000 --> 48:43.000]  Did the prosecutor seek conviction without regard to justice?
[48:43.000 --> 48:51.000]  You should go through these. You would be surprised at what you can file a grievance against him for.
[48:51.000 --> 48:58.000]  One of my favorite ones, did duty to respond to misconduct.
[48:58.000 --> 49:12.000]  Did the prosecutor have knowledge that another person associated with prosecutor's office, and that includes a police officer because a police officer is considered to be a member of the prosecutor's team?
[49:12.000 --> 49:27.000]  Did another person associated with prosecutor's office was engaged in action, intended to act or refused to act in a manner that was a violation of illegal obligation to the prosecutor's office, or in violation of law?
[49:27.000 --> 49:36.000]  Referred the matter to higher authority in the prosecutor's office, included if warranted, by the seriousness of the matter referred to the chief prosecutor.
[49:36.000 --> 49:43.000]  In fact, he does the opposite. He's the one that advises him to do stuff that's illegal.
[49:43.000 --> 49:50.000]  But go to that, look through that, and bar grieve the prosecutor.
[49:50.000 --> 50:02.000]  By bar grieving the prosecutor, you will want to protect your lawyer and give your lawyer plausible deniability.
[50:02.000 --> 50:08.000]  If you bar grieve the prosecutor, the prosecutor's going to come to your lawyer and say, what the heck is going on?
[50:08.000 --> 50:13.000]  And she's bar grieving me, poor me, poor me.
[50:13.000 --> 50:21.000]  And the lawyer's going to say, holy crap, she's bar grieving him, she's going to bar grieve me next.
[50:21.000 --> 50:30.000]  Now they put the judge in a position where he needs to get rid of this case to get you off of their cases.
[50:30.000 --> 50:36.000]  It's all about the politics. It's not about the law. Does that make sense, Kathy?
[50:36.000 --> 50:41.000]  Yes, it makes perfect sense to me. I do have a question, though, about this.
[50:41.000 --> 50:45.000]  Because I'm thinking they had to produce the discovery of the surveillance tape.
[50:45.000 --> 50:53.000]  My attorney keeps telling me that they can proceed without the surveillance tape.
[50:53.000 --> 51:04.000]  That the prosecutor and coals and everybody else doesn't have to produce the tape, but it mentioned in the police report that there is one.
[51:04.000 --> 51:07.000]  So...
[51:07.000 --> 51:15.000]  Since they mentioned just the police report mentions one,
[51:15.000 --> 51:31.000]  that is, what was the term, in order to give evidence into the record, you have to establish, I keep losing the terms,
[51:31.000 --> 51:38.000]  we have to establish a reason for the evidence to be in there.
[51:38.000 --> 51:52.000]  Once the police officer mentioned the surveillance tape in his report, then he opened the door to the surveillance tapes.
[51:52.000 --> 51:53.000]  Right.
[51:53.000 --> 51:59.000]  Now they have to produce it because the report says there's a surveillance tape and a jury's going to think,
[51:59.000 --> 52:10.000]  well, if there is a surveillance tape, and after looking at the tape, they decided to prosecute,
[52:10.000 --> 52:15.000]  that must mean there's damning evidence in that tape.
[52:15.000 --> 52:21.000]  So you have the right to force them to produce the tape.
[52:21.000 --> 52:22.000]  Right.
[52:22.000 --> 52:29.000]  So should we file a criminal complaint against the prosecutor or just bar it even?
[52:29.000 --> 52:30.000]  Okay.
[52:30.000 --> 52:32.000]  You are in Arizona.
[52:32.000 --> 52:39.000]  You certainly have a law that reflects 18 U.S. Code 242.
[52:39.000 --> 52:42.000]  Have you ever heard of the Ku Klux Klan Act?
[52:42.000 --> 52:43.000]  Yes.
[52:43.000 --> 52:46.000]  We've been researching exactly what we're...
[52:46.000 --> 52:47.000]  Okay.
[52:47.000 --> 52:55.000]  Mostly, you hear about the Ku Klux Klan Act under 18 U.S. Code... I mean, 42 U.S. Code 1983.
[52:55.000 --> 53:03.000]  And that says that if a public official violates the law relating to his office and harms you in the process, you can sue it.
[53:03.000 --> 53:11.000]  But the one we don't hear about so much is the first part of the Ku Klux Klan Act, and that's 18 U.S. Code 242.
[53:11.000 --> 53:15.000]  Title 18 of the U.S. Code is the criminal code.
[53:15.000 --> 53:16.000]  Right.
[53:16.000 --> 53:36.000]  So what it says is that if a public official acts on the code of his authority, fails to perform a duty he's required to perform, or exerts or purports to exert an authority he does not expressly have,
[53:36.000 --> 53:42.000]  and in the process denies a citizen in the full and free access to or enjoyment of a right.
[53:42.000 --> 53:44.000]  That's crime.
[53:44.000 --> 53:49.000]  And most every state has a statute that reflects 18 U.S. Code 242.
[53:49.000 --> 54:00.000]  In Texas, it is 39.03 people code, and the verbiage of the statute is almost identical to the federal.
[54:00.000 --> 54:03.000]  You probably have one in Arizona.
[54:03.000 --> 54:04.000]  We do.
[54:04.000 --> 54:05.000]  Okay.
[54:05.000 --> 54:08.000]  Then absolutely charging with it.
[54:08.000 --> 54:09.000]  Okay.
[54:09.000 --> 54:12.000]  So we can file a criminal complaint?
[54:12.000 --> 54:14.000]  Yeah, just fill out a criminal complaint.
[54:14.000 --> 54:18.000]  You can look on insurance imprudence.
[54:18.000 --> 54:20.000]  That's another website of mine.
[54:20.000 --> 54:27.000]  And look, there's a bunch of frogs on the front of it because I call this the frog farm conspiracy.
[54:27.000 --> 54:34.000]  Top frog on the right, documents and research, click blanks, and there will be a complaint, a blank criminal complaint.
[54:34.000 --> 54:38.000]  And the criminal complaint in this case is a Texas complaint.
[54:38.000 --> 54:41.000]  I don't have a blank complaint for all of the states.
[54:41.000 --> 54:48.000]  But the form of a criminal complaint is not important.
[54:48.000 --> 54:54.000]  The structure of how you make the accusation is relatively important.
[54:54.000 --> 54:59.000]  In Texas, it says that a complaint shall run in the name of the state of Texas.
[54:59.000 --> 55:04.000]  That's why it starts out with in the name of and under the authority of the state of Texas.
[55:04.000 --> 55:10.000]  But most states use the same form that you would use to file a motion in the court.
[55:10.000 --> 55:18.000]  You can go online and put in Arizona criminal complaint and you'll come up with a hit on a criminal complaint file against somebody.
[55:18.000 --> 55:21.000]  Just look at the structure of it.
[55:21.000 --> 55:26.000]  And then find the statute for official misconduct.
[55:26.000 --> 55:28.000]  That's what it's generally called.
[55:28.000 --> 55:30.000]  In Texas, we have two.
[55:30.000 --> 55:37.000]  We have official misconduct and that's where you cheat with state money and official oppression.
[55:37.000 --> 55:40.000]  That's when you denies someone in a riot.
[55:40.000 --> 55:46.000]  And in most states, they both fall under official misconduct.
[55:46.000 --> 55:55.000]  But find the statute and look at the complaints on jurisprudence and how they're structured.
[55:55.000 --> 56:08.000]  You write the complaint in the verbiage of the statute so that you state the elements of the crime in the statement.
[56:08.000 --> 56:21.000]  It's really relatively simple and it's not critical how you actually structure a complaint because it's intended that private citizens file complaints.
[56:21.000 --> 56:26.000]  When a police officer files a complaint, he does not do that as a police officer.
[56:26.000 --> 56:31.000]  He does that in his capacity as a private citizen.
[56:31.000 --> 56:33.000]  Same as you.
[56:33.000 --> 56:42.000]  And all complaints are directed to some magistrates.
[56:42.000 --> 56:51.000]  So you might give the criminal complaint against the prosecutor to the judge.
[56:51.000 --> 57:03.000]  And when the judge refuses to act on the complaint, instead of going to the district attorney with a complaint against this local prosecutor,
[57:03.000 --> 57:13.000]  you go to the district attorney with a complaint against this judge for not taking a complaint against the prosecutor.
[57:13.000 --> 57:19.000]  And that creates a little more politics.
[57:19.000 --> 57:21.000]  Does that make sense?
[57:21.000 --> 57:22.000]  Yes, it makes sense.
[57:22.000 --> 57:23.000]  I do have a question.
[57:23.000 --> 57:30.000]  Because they appointed me an attorney, should I tell him I want to do this?
[57:30.000 --> 57:31.000]  Nope.
[57:31.000 --> 57:32.000]  None of his business.
[57:32.000 --> 57:33.000]  Okay.
[57:33.000 --> 57:34.000]  All right.
[57:34.000 --> 57:35.000]  That is none of his business.
[57:35.000 --> 57:37.000]  He don't have anything to say about it.
[57:37.000 --> 57:40.000]  And you tell him nothing about it.
[57:40.000 --> 57:44.000]  That way he has plausible deniability.
[57:44.000 --> 57:45.000]  Okay.
[57:45.000 --> 57:48.000]  When they come to him and say, what the heck is going on?
[57:48.000 --> 57:49.000]  She's filing criminal complaints.
[57:49.000 --> 57:54.000]  He can honestly and legitimately say, I don't know anything about it.
[57:54.000 --> 58:01.000]  And if he tries to ask you about it, tell him don't even go there.
[58:01.000 --> 58:10.000]  If that's bordering on tampering with a witness and you don't want to go there, that'll protect your lawyer.
[58:10.000 --> 58:11.000]  Okay.
[58:11.000 --> 58:15.000]  And make it so that your lawyer can actually make this thing go away.
[58:15.000 --> 58:16.000]  Okay.
[58:16.000 --> 58:19.000]  We do need to finish this up on the next side of the car as we're building up.
[58:19.000 --> 58:20.000]  Hang on.
[58:20.000 --> 58:21.000]  We will pick you up when we get back.
[58:21.000 --> 58:23.000]  We'll go to our top of the hour break.
[58:23.000 --> 58:27.000]  This is Randy Kelton, never seen with Eddie Craig, who ruled for our radio.
[58:27.000 --> 58:33.000]  I'll call in numbers, 512-646-1984, and we've been talking about this fundraiser.
[58:33.000 --> 58:38.000]  And one thing seems to have gotten lost in the main city.
[58:38.000 --> 58:40.000]  That's a Randy Spear Fund.
[58:40.000 --> 58:44.000]  We don't want to forget about Randy Spear Fund.
[58:44.000 --> 58:45.000]  All right.
[58:45.000 --> 58:46.000]  Just kidding.
[58:46.000 --> 58:50.000]  Randy Kelton, Debbie Steve, and Eddie Craig, real world radio.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.000 --> 58:59.000]  The Schools for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books
[58:59.000 --> 59:00.000]  that can really help.
[59:00.000 --> 59:05.000]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.000 --> 59:06.000]  today.
[59:06.000 --> 59:10.000]  It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you
[59:10.000 --> 59:13.000]  to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.000 --> 59:23.000]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation.
[59:23.000 --> 59:27.000]  Growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[59:27.000 --> 59:33.000]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:33.000 --> 59:40.000]  call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.000 --> 59:44.000]  That's 888-551-0102.
[59:44.000 --> 59:54.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:14.000 --> 01:00:43.000]  Thank you for watching.
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  Women have forever been second-class citizens in Saudi Arabia.
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:53.000]  They can't be lawyers, run for public office, or even drive a car.
[01:00:53.000 --> 01:00:57.000]  They must wear veils and garments that cover them from head to toe.
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:01.000]  And they can't leave home without the say so of their male guardians.
[01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:05.000]  But now the Saudi government is taking control to a scary new level.
[01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:10.000]  Immigration authorities now monitor women electronically at the border and send text messages
[01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:14.000]  to their male guardians informing them where their women are.
[01:01:14.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  I suppose the next stop on this Orwellian train would be tracking ankle bracelets
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:21.000]  or maybe implantable locator microchips.
[01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:24.000]  Then Saudi men could track their women like cattle.
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  In Japan where pampering your dog is serious stuff, pet lovers can now keep track of every step their beloved pooches take.
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:47.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back to tell you about the latest in pet equipment, dog pedometers, in a moment.
[01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:49.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:53.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:58.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:03.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:06.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:13.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:24.000]  On weekends in Tokyo's Yoyogi Park, it's common to see women wheeling their dogs in strollers dressed in frilly doggy attire.
[01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:28.000]  In case you didn't know, pampering pets in Japan is a national pastime.
[01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:33.000]  Now dog lovers have a new way to do it on their pets, a cloud-connected pedometer pendant.
[01:02:33.000 --> 01:02:37.000]  The tracks each time Fido puts one paw in front of the other.
[01:02:37.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  The pedometer is strapped to the dog's neck and logs steps, shivering motions, and body temperature.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  Transfer this vital data to the cloud, owners, and their cell phones at the pendant.
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  Monitoring pups with pendants?
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:53.000]  Pardon my Japanese, but I'd say Sayonara to this trend.
[01:02:53.000 --> 01:02:58.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:03:23.000 --> 01:03:47.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:47.000 --> 01:03:53.000]  I'm going to tell Deb Stevens at a great move on radio, and we're talking to Kathy in Arizona.
[01:03:53.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  Kathy, probably you don't want to bar grieve your lawyer yet.
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:03.000]  Okay.
[01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:16.000]  You bar grieve the prosecutor, and your lawyer's going to consider if she knows enough to file under the American Bar Association
[01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:18.000]  model standards.
[01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:22.000]  She knows more about it than I do.
[01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:27.000]  So good chance she's going to clobber me next.
[01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:33.000]  And this is the one thing we try to help people understand.
[01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  You know, when I walk into a courthouse, I am the baddest motor scooter in the building.
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:46.000]  And the reason I am is I'm nobody.
[01:04:46.000 --> 01:04:47.000]  I'm not a lawyer.
[01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:48.000]  I'm not a bailiff.
[01:04:48.000 --> 01:04:51.000]  I'm not a judge.
[01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:54.000]  I am the sovereign.
[01:04:54.000 --> 01:05:03.000]  They all answer to me, and they better not forget it because I will certainly remind them.
[01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:08.000]  They know how powerful you are and how dangerous you are.
[01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:13.000]  And the last thing they want is for you to know that.
[01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:19.000]  When they find out that you know, the whole ballgame changes.
[01:05:19.000 --> 01:05:22.000]  So grieve the lawyer.
[01:05:22.000 --> 01:05:25.000]  You can grieve the judge with impunity.
[01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:31.000]  I have a site, judicialconduct.com, but it's not working yet.
[01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:36.000]  But you can just file a complaint against the judge for anything you want to.
[01:05:36.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  It's better to have a more specific one against the prosecutor because that essentially throws down the gauntlet.
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:49.000]  That tells them, you know how to hammer in good.
[01:05:49.000 --> 01:05:59.000]  We had a guy that took on the city of Austin and one lawyer, every time he asked his name, said his mother didn't give him one for a year.
[01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  He finally got the guy on the stand and asking his name, and he said on the stand, my mother didn't give me one.
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:10.000]  Mike turned at the judge and said, your honor, I need his name.
[01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:14.000]  And the judge said, counselor, give the man your name.
[01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:26.000]  Oh, your honor, if I give him my name, he'll start bar-grieving me and I get out of the prosecutor's office next month and I won't be able to get malpractice insurance.
[01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  And the judge turned to Mike and told Mike what his name was.
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  Oh, your honor, he said he was like a little kid because he knew this was going to hurt him big time.
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:47.000]  So hurt him big time, hurt the prosecutor. He's not going to do you any favors anyway.
[01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:49.000]  So who do I file?
[01:06:49.000 --> 01:07:01.000]  Criminal complaints? I know I do the bar grievance with the bar, but the criminal complaint, do I take that to the judge I appeared before?
[01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  Yes.
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:13.000]  Nowhere in law is a criminal complaint directed to a prosecuting attorney or a police officer.
[01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:25.000]  A prosecuting attorney is generally authorized to accept a criminal complaint, but nowhere is one directed to him.
[01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:38.000]  Criminal complaints are always directed to some magistrate, and every judge is a magistrate.
[01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:58.000]  When you go back to court next time, have prepared a criminal accusation against the prosecuting attorney for official oppression, for denying you and your wife to be faced by your accuser by failing to produce all the evidence against you.
[01:07:58.000 --> 01:08:11.000]  And take it to a notary and have it authenticated by a notary. When you put that in the judge's hand, he's being the judge, and he becomes a magistrate.
[01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:16.000]  And that is a duty from which he may not shield himself.
[01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  It is a duty to examine into the sufficiency of your allegation, make a determination of probable cause, and forward the complaint to the court of jurisdiction.
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:42.000]  If he doesn't do that, he fails to perform the duties he's required to perform in the process, denies you and your wife to petition the court for redress agreements.
[01:08:42.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  So you take that to the prosecuting attorney, and the judge will get apoplexy when the prosecutor, when the district attorney calls the judge and says, got this woman down here trying to get me to present you to a grand jury.
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  He's going to get real excited, and you'll get yourself a bit of politics. If there's anything, we'll get this thrown out.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  Okay. This is very interesting. Thank you.
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:15.000]  Just one word of caution.
[01:09:15.000 --> 01:09:16.000]  Okay.
[01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:35.000]  Don't have too much fun with this. It can definitely get to be too much fun when you start seeing those guys doing that little chicken dance they do, or they start shifting from one foot to the other, trying to figure out a way to deal with you.
[01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:41.000]  Okay. Have fun with it. Talk to your husband. Sounds like he listens and he knows what's going on.
[01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:51.000]  And he can be helpful, and if you need any input on how to structure the compliance, give us a call back in, but it's pretty straightforward.
[01:09:51.000 --> 01:10:12.000]  And a complaint by a sister doesn't have to be perfect because they're intended to be filed by one of the citizens. So when a prosecutor gets the complaint he's required to produce what they call an information, an information is a complaint structured to be in accordance with all law.
[01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:21.000]  So if yours is not in fact the right, nobody cares. It doesn't matter because he'll fix that when he gets it, or he's required to.
[01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:28.000]  Okay. Thank you very much for calling in. We're going to move along. We've spent quite a while here.
[01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:39.000]  And we're going to go to Paul in Wisconsin. Hello, Paul. I think I've actually unmuted.
[01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:48.000]  You got me unmuted now? No, I can't hear what you're saying. Okay. I didn't know yet.
[01:10:48.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  Go ahead. I've been drinking too much of that Yorba Matcha tea.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  This stuff really winds you up. You know, you're just terrible flirts when it is, Randy. That's what it is. Your wife know how bad a flirt you are? All them girls? The Collins?
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:31.000]  Okay. I've got your timeline, but I'm sorry I didn't get time to go through it. Tell me what, Paul's issue was, he wanted to file a criminal complaint against a judge. What did you want to accuse the judge of doing or failing to do?
[01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:43.000]  Well, I had a counsel. My counsel couldn't be there. And eight days before that, he sent the thing in. The attorney did.
[01:11:43.000 --> 01:12:03.000]  Okay. Now, wait a minute, wait a minute. Hold on, hold on. We need to get this a way of thinking about what we're doing here. Instead of telling me what the judge did, tell me what law he violated.
[01:12:03.000 --> 01:12:16.000]  Well, I'll tell you what. I think he violated. I couldn't be wrong, but he denied me my due process, and he denied me counsel. Those are two things that come to my head.
[01:12:16.000 --> 01:12:35.000]  Okay. He denied you right. Oh, okay. Right to counsel. That was poison. Okay. Now we know we're at. This is where your lawyer was unable to appear in court because he was in the hospital or for some excusable reason.
[01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  Great.
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:40.000]  Then the judge proceeded with the hearing anyway.
[01:12:40.000 --> 01:12:41.000]  Correct.
[01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:51.000]  That's official question, future misconduct. And you might even be able to take that one to the fix.
[01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:55.000]  But it's more fun running the routine in the state.
[01:12:55.000 --> 01:13:16.000]  As Kathy's still listening, what we normally do is run the routine in the state. What the routine involves is filing your complaint with everyone who could possibly be able to act on your complaint and getting everybody to refuse.
[01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  And it's the Tar Baby Syndrome.
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:27.000]  You take the complaint to the first person, hoping that he's not going to act on it.
[01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  Like in Kathy's case, we've suggested she take the complaint against the local prosecutor to the judge and get him to refuse to act on it.
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:39.000]  Now he just touched your Tar Baby.
[01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:50.000]  Now you put the judge's name on the next complaint and take it to the prosecutor. And when he, the prosecutor refuses to act, put the prosecutor's name on it and take it to the attorney general.
[01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:58.000]  And then attorney general refuses to act. You come back to the Chief Justice of the State Supreme.
[01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:12.000]  He's a magistrate. When he refuses to act, now you go back to the grand jury. You want to present this to the grand jury. And who's going to interfere with you now? Because you've got everybody's name in there.
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:17.000]  And then get someone to interfere with your access to the grand jury.
[01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:20.000]  Now that's Temple of the Witness, destruction of justice.
[01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:43.000]  The complaint gets more serious than the one before it. And the problem they have is, without regard to the validity of the first complaint, each complaint after that is essentially dead bang.
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:15:04.000]  It doesn't matter if that original complaint was valid or not. The official you filed it with had a very specific duty. When you filed the complaint with the magistrate, he does not have the option of refusing to accept the complaint.
[01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:14.000]  That's not something he has the right to do. That is, Ms. Feeson sent off his failed performer duties required to perform.
[01:15:14.000 --> 01:15:25.000]  So, in your case, look up official misconduct or official oppression in the Wisconsin Code. Have you done that, Paul?
[01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:29.000]  No, I haven't. But I won't.
[01:15:29.000 --> 01:15:39.000]  And I would like you to take the telephone receiver and beat yourself around the eyes and the ears. And not some sense into yourself.
[01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:44.000]  You can't figure out what to charge them unless you've read the code.
[01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:45.000]  Right.
[01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:52.000]  Don't read the code. I suggest you take the penal code and just read it.
[01:15:52.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  The other bit, our codes in the United States are not big at all. And it may be about 100 pages.
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:08.000]  But 60% of it is white space because it's all in outline format.
[01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:12.000]  And if you read it, I suggest you read it twice.
[01:16:12.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  First time just cruise through it. And the reason you wanted to cruise through the whole thing, because I can guarantee you, get about halfway through it and it's going to be like a comic book.
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  You're going to start getting tickled at all of the things you can charge these guys with. You will be absolutely amazed at all the stuff you can throw at them.
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:39.000]  Then just cruise through it and then go back and read it the second time.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:43.000]  Then all the stuff at the back and the front, all the connections that they get to come together.
[01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:47.000]  And after reading it twice, you'll understand it better than the prosecutor does.
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:49.000]  Because I've never seen a prosecutor who's read it.
[01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  Hang on. Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig, Ruva Radio are called in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:56.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  At Capital Coin & Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:13.000]  Capital Coin features a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  In addition to providing the best prices in the nation, we want to bring you the best shopping experience both in-store and online.
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  In addition to coins and bullion, we carry popular young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Breast.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:34.000]  We offer freeze-dried, storeable foods by Augustin Farms, Bergy Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  You can lock in a spot price with our Silverpool and we set up Metals IRA accounts.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  Call us at 512-646-440 for more details.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:52.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10-6, Saturdays 10-2.
[01:17:52.000 --> 01:17:58.000]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-440.
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:29.000]  Beyond Tangy Tangerine is available at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Quarantine Road.
[01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  Calcium, magnesium, selenium and zinc. Take a moment now and think, if you have a little drink, every day will bring the life that you've been looking for.
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  The bookstore also carries the works of Dr. Joel Wallach, founder of Young Jevity and creator of Beyond Tangy Tangerine.
[01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:28.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:28.000 --> 01:19:36.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Debra Stephens, Ada Craig, Live Low Radio.
[01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:42.000]  And we're talking to Paul in Wisconsin.
[01:19:42.000 --> 01:19:43.000]  Yep.
[01:19:43.000 --> 01:19:44.000]  Okay.
[01:19:44.000 --> 01:19:46.000]  So you got her.
[01:19:46.000 --> 01:19:57.000]  I was wondering on this too, because the judge quoted a statute, and that's what a statute was for his reasoning to go ahead with this.
[01:19:57.000 --> 01:20:09.000]  And I was wondering, I don't think the statute really means anything to you, if it was a civil matter.
[01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:24.000]  But a civil code does not apply to a criminal prosecution unless it goes to an issue that is not addressed in the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:29.000]  Code of Criminal Procedure is a subset of civil procedure.
[01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  Civil procedure is actually trial procedure.
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:44.000]  How you file a motion, when you file a motion, how a motion is brought on for hearing, how a motion is heard, you know, these things all happen in a criminal.
[01:20:44.000 --> 01:20:57.000]  But so the civil applies to the criminal in those aspects, unless the issue is not addressed by the criminal.
[01:20:57.000 --> 01:21:03.000]  And this is going to be addressed by the criminal.
[01:21:03.000 --> 01:21:07.000]  Actually, it's addressed by the Constitution.
[01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:08.000]  Okay.
[01:21:08.000 --> 01:21:09.000]  That's okay.
[01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:10.000]  That's what I was wondering.
[01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  Back up slightly, what was the nature of the hearing?
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:18.000]  It was an injunction.
[01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:19.000]  Okay.
[01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:22.000]  Then it does go to an issue.
[01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:33.000]  Now, if this was a hearing like the federal courts have a scheduling hearing, a scheduling hearing doesn't go to the adjudication of the case.
[01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:35.000]  So that's not a big deal.
[01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  It really wouldn't matter.
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:45.000]  You really wouldn't be denied any due process over them deciding when you had to have discovery in.
[01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:52.000]  But over an injunction, this is a adversarial hearing.
[01:21:52.000 --> 01:21:55.000]  You absolutely had right to counsel.
[01:21:55.000 --> 01:21:58.000]  That's criminal on part of the judge.
[01:21:58.000 --> 01:22:01.000]  And he absolutely should be hammered.
[01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:05.000]  But read the code first.
[01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:08.000]  Okay, you won't take long.
[01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  I was sitting with my, go ahead.
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:14.000]  The criminal code.
[01:22:14.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  Hang on a sec.
[01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:46.000]  Thank you.
[01:22:46.000 --> 01:23:15.000]  Thank you.
[01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  Okay.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  Sorry about that.
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  I think I'm back.
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:21.000]  Yeah, you're back.
[01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:22.000]  I hear you anyway.
[01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:23.000]  Okay.
[01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:24.000]  Okay.
[01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  Okay.
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:28.000]  Where were we when I dropped out?
[01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:30.000]  Oh, are you talking?
[01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:32.000]  I had too much noise.
[01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:35.000]  Okay, go ahead.
[01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:44.000]  No, I was just asking, you know, because it was a civil matter, but like you already explained that, you know, it's, you know, I was still adversely affected because I didn't have a right to counsel.
[01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:46.000]  Right.
[01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  Yeah, this wasn't a reason I asked the question is it just went to the administration of the court.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:00.000]  Then it's something that's not adversarial.
[01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:06.000]  Then he might be able to go ahead and make some type of administrative determination.
[01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:09.000]  But this went to a injunction.
[01:24:09.000 --> 01:24:12.000]  That's an adversarial proceeding.
[01:24:12.000 --> 01:24:18.000]  You absolutely had right to counsel and that should get criminal charges against a chump.
[01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:19.000]  Okay.
[01:24:19.000 --> 01:24:20.000]  And that's great.
[01:24:20.000 --> 01:24:27.000]  That's a great thing to start the process rolling with.
[01:24:27.000 --> 01:24:28.000]  Good.
[01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  Because you accuse everybody in the process of shielding the judge from prosecution.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:39.000]  No, I understand.
[01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:46.000]  Because he was just trying to use a statute where the statute said unless the time is extended upon written consent of the parties.
[01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  That's what he was trying to, you know, use that to get himself, you know, to go ahead with.
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:52.000]  Wait, wait.
[01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  I couldn't understand what you said.
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:24:59.000]  Oh, I was reading from the statute he quoted.
[01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:05.000]  It said unless the time is extended upon the written consent of the parties.
[01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:08.000]  You know, that's basic.
[01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:10.000]  That's a sentence fragment.
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  What's that out of?
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  That's out of the statute.
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  You're not being very clear.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  What statute?
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:24.000]  The one he was trying to quote, getting by with the.
[01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  You're not answering my question.
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:30.000]  Will you give me the whole statute?
[01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  Okay.
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:37.000]  You give me a sentence fragment out of the middle of something and I have no idea what it's addressing.
[01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:42.000]  Okay.
[01:25:42.000 --> 01:25:48.000]  Now, this is a temporary strain order.
[01:25:48.000 --> 01:25:51.000]  And this is the subsection C.
[01:25:51.000 --> 01:26:01.000]  It says the temporary restraining order is an effect until a hearing is held on issuance of an injunction under sub four.
[01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  The temporary strain order is not void if they're responded as admitted into a dwelling that the order directs him or her to avoid.
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:23.000]  A judge or circuit court commissioner shall hold a hearing on issuance of an injunction within 14 days after the temporary restraining order is issued.
[01:26:23.000 --> 01:26:38.000]  Unless the time is extended upon the written consent of both parties or extended once for 14 days upon a filing that the respondent has not served with a copy of the restraint,
[01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:45.000]  temporary restraining order, although the petitioner has exercised due diligence.
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:46.000]  Okay.
[01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:50.000]  This is that is not even on point.
[01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  Because the issue is not timeliness of the hearing.
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:27:03.000]  The issue is ability of a council to appear in court.
[01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:04.000]  Okay.
[01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  Okay.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  And this is you're you're compromised by inability of council.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:13.000]  Right.
[01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:25.000]  Whatever this statute says is preempted by your constitutional and you will also have a statutory right in the code of criminal procedure to council.
[01:27:25.000 --> 01:27:30.000]  All of the the Constitution doesn't really grant you anything.
[01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  The Constitution is a restrictive document.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:37.000]  It restricts the government officials from doing certain things.
[01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:48.000]  It's in the statute where you're actually granted the right. So most every restriction that's in the Constitution will be qualified into statute.
[01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:50.000]  And that's what you quote is the statute.
[01:27:50.000 --> 01:27:56.000]  So there'll be one in code of criminal procedure guaranteeing your right to council.
[01:27:56.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  And that preempts everything else.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:07.000]  So, okay, now it makes a little more sense where he was going. He was trying to use the wrong statute.
[01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  Okay.
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:09.000]  Okay.
[01:28:09.000 --> 01:28:11.000]  But we do need we needed duty to move along.
[01:28:11.000 --> 01:28:12.000]  I understand.
[01:28:12.000 --> 01:28:15.000]  Prepare a complaint and send me send me a copy.
[01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:17.000]  And let me look it over.
[01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  Send me a copy of the complaint and a copy of the statute.
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:24.000]  You're accusing him of violating.
[01:28:24.000 --> 01:28:25.000]  Okay.
[01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:26.000]  We'll do.
[01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  That way I can look at both. I can look at the elements of the accusation and make sure that all of the elements are named in the complaint.
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  Okay.
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:38.000]  Okay.
[01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:39.000]  Thank you, Paul.
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  Good one.
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:41.000]  Bye.
[01:28:41.000 --> 01:28:42.000]  Okay. Bye.
[01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:47.000]  Now we're going to go to Alfred in Texas.
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:48.000]  Hello, Alfred.
[01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:51.000]  I understand you have a family law issue.
[01:28:51.000 --> 01:28:55.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:28:56.000]  Go ahead.
[01:28:56.000 --> 01:28:58.000]  Can you hear me?
[01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:00.000]  Can you hear me pretty good?
[01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:03.000]  Yes, I hear you.
[01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:09.000]  Me and my wife have been separated for about a year now.
[01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:21.000]  And we have two sons and we told each other that we weren't going to fight for them, split them up, that we're going to go 50-50 custody.
[01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:25.000]  We weren't going to go after each other for any money or anything like that.
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  You know, as soon as we both had the money to file for divorce, it was going to be, you know, in and out of the court.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  Okay.
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  Hang on.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:39.000]  This is Randy Kelk, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rudolf LaRadeo.
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  I'll call in numbers.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  512-646-1984.
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:51.000]  This is our four-hour info marathon and things start picking up toward the end.
[01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  We have a couple of callers.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  Julius, I see you there.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:55.000]  We'll beat you up on the other side.
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:01.000]  A noble lie.
[01:30:01.000 --> 01:30:06.000]  Oklahoma City, 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  Based on the damage pattern to the building, but the government sends impossible.
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:14.000]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  Expose the cover up now at anobleye.com.
[01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  The Rule of Law Radio Network is proud to present a due process of law seminar hosted by our own Eddie Craig.
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  Eddie is a former Nacodotius Sheriff's Deputy and for the past 21 years he's been studying the due process of law
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  and now offers his knowledge to you at a seminar every Sunday
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  from 2 o'clock to 5 o'clock at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:54.000]  Admission is $20, so please make plans to come by and sit with Eddie
[01:30:54.000 --> 01:31:00.000]  and learn for yourself what the true intent of law really is.
[01:31:00.000 --> 01:31:04.000]  At hempusa.org we offer chemical-free products to people around the world,
[01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  detoxifying, self-healing while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest selling product, micro plant powder.
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  Our micro plant powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc and silica
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  to help rebuild the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:28.000]  Micro plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:31:28.000 --> 01:31:32.000]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org
[01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  and remember all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  We constantly strive to give you the best service,
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:42.000]  highest quality and rapid shipping anywhere,
[01:31:42.000 --> 01:31:45.000]  and we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the US.
[01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  That's 908-6912608.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:32:00.000]  See what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:03.000]  Looking for some treats?
[01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:08.000]  You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:32:34.000 --> 01:32:37.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:32:37.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig with Rue La Radio.
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:51.000]  We have Alfred from Texas and you and your ex were contemplating an uncontested divorce
[01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:57.000]  and take it there are children involved, at least one. Is that correct?
[01:32:57.000 --> 01:33:00.000]  Two boys.
[01:33:00.000 --> 01:33:07.000]  Well, it's almost never possible to have an uncontested divorce
[01:33:07.000 --> 01:33:10.000]  when there are children involved.
[01:33:10.000 --> 01:33:14.000]  Did your ex get a lawyer?
[01:33:14.000 --> 01:33:18.000]  No, from what I understand she hasn't got a lawyer.
[01:33:18.000 --> 01:33:21.000]  Okay, because when you get a lawyer,
[01:33:21.000 --> 01:33:26.000]  lawyers create controversy so they can charge more money.
[01:33:26.000 --> 01:33:32.000]  But if there's no lawyer yet, you may actually have a chance of fixing things.
[01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:39.000]  Now, as I understand, according to my notes, she took the children on the left.
[01:33:39.000 --> 01:33:46.000]  Yes, yesterday when I found out that she was going to visit with them
[01:33:46.000 --> 01:33:50.000]  from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.
[01:33:50.000 --> 01:33:57.000]  and when I kept calling her and texting her, she wouldn't answer.
[01:33:57.000 --> 01:34:00.000]  I told her a lot.
[01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  Wait a minute, hold on. She was going to visit the children.
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:06.000]  Did the children stand with you?
[01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  Yes, they had been staying with me for the last month and a half.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:11.000]  She barely visits them.
[01:34:11.000 --> 01:34:19.000]  She probably has 12 hours of visitation with them in the last month and a half.
[01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:24.000]  Okay, do you have any kind of legal separation?
[01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  No. I have my own house.
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:39.000]  Okay, so there is no temporary orders in place.
[01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  Normally, if you get a legal separation and there are children, there will be temporary orders.
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:45.000]  There's a standard set of temporary orders.
[01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:48.000]  In this case, there's nothing.
[01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:53.000]  So I take it the issue is that she took the kids on the left.
[01:34:53.000 --> 01:35:00.000]  Yes, the day before yesterday, I went over there to get the kids for supper.
[01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:05.000]  Okay, wait. Don't give us the whole drawn-out story.
[01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:09.000]  She took the kids on the left. Is that the crux of it?
[01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:13.000]  Yes, that's pretty much it.
[01:35:13.000 --> 01:35:20.000]  Okay, she's the mother.
[01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:24.000]  I'm getting tiny little bits and pieces.
[01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:26.000]  Give me a full sentence.
[01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:33.000]  Yes, she is the mother.
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:35.000]  Okay, I'm still getting bits and pieces.
[01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  Okay, I take it she is the mother.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:38.000]  Yes.
[01:35:38.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  If she is the mother and you're not divorced and there's no order in place, she can take the children.
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:52.000]  Without letting me know where they're at?
[01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  Or letting me know?
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:55.000]  Oh, yeah.
[01:35:55.000 --> 01:35:58.000]  Yeah, where's the rule?
[01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:01.000]  There are no rules here, for the most part.
[01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:08.000]  She can't take the children, leave the state with no intention of coming back.
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:19.000]  Now, if her mother is sick in Latvia, she can take the kids and jump on a plane and fly to Latvia if she wants to.
[01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:20.000]  But she can't.
[01:36:20.000 --> 01:36:21.000]  Nothing illegal.
[01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  Nothing illegal about that.
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:41.000]  If you want to do something at this point, the thing to do would be file for divorce and ask for temporary orders.
[01:36:41.000 --> 01:36:43.000]  Okay.
[01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  But here's the deal.
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:52.000]  In a divorce, the courts generally go by the golden rule.
[01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:56.000]  The wife gets the gold, the husband gets the shaft.
[01:36:56.000 --> 01:36:59.000]  And that's us guys feeling sorry for ourselves.
[01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:07.000]  But for the most part, the courts are going to want the children to be with their mother.
[01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:09.000]  That may not be right.
[01:37:09.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  It may not be fair, but it is traditional.
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:17.000]  And that is the way it works in the world I live in, at least the country I live in.
[01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:23.000]  The courts are going to want the children to be with the mother.
[01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:33.000]  If you try to go to the court and take the children away from the mother, you have yourself one steep uphill battle to fight.
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:44.000]  So I would suggest that you not let her behavior turn into an insult against you.
[01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:47.000]  Because in the end, it's not about you.
[01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  If you hurt your feelings, you feel like she did something wrong to you. So what?
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:57.000]  It's not about you. It's not about her. It's about the children.
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:37:59.000]  Exactly.
[01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:11.000]  If whatever you're going to do, if you will always weigh that against what is in the best interest of my children without regard to what she did to me or didn't do to me,
[01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:16.000]  because I assure you that is exactly what the judge is going to do.
[01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:21.000]  I was just talking to someone about this today.
[01:38:21.000 --> 01:38:33.000]  A good family law judge, if he does his job right, will come out of the court and everybody's going to be mad at him.
[01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:38.000]  I would not want to be a family law judge.
[01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  Extremely difficult.
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  And he is only going to consider what he thinks is best for the children.
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  So even going to a court and asking for temporary orders, they're going to give the children to the mother.
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:39:11.000]  Certainly, unless she's a multiple convicted drug addict with suicidal tendencies and all kinds of other stuff, it takes a lot.
[01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  Is this something you can reconcile?
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:18.000]  No.
[01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:24.000]  She's not like that, but her mother is.
[01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:28.000]  Okay, you sound angry.
[01:39:28.000 --> 01:39:29.000]  No.
[01:39:29.000 --> 01:39:39.000]  And just a word of caution. Do not let her mother harm the children.
[01:39:39.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  I'm not angry on creating the.
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:40:03.000]  It's hard not to. This is difficult because these are really emotional issues and certainly don't want a mother-in-law causing damage to the children because she may not like the son-in-law.
[01:40:03.000 --> 01:40:09.000]  And that'll be your job to ensure she doesn't do that.
[01:40:09.000 --> 01:40:12.000]  I'm just glad I'm not in your position.
[01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:16.000]  There's no easy answers here.
[01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:23.000]  But I guess I've never really did get to your true question. What was your question?
[01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  I was wondering what I could do. I talked to him once.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:38.000]  Okay, that's kind of that's what I thought the question was and I apologize for getting ahead of myself.
[01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:44.000]  But in the real world is probably not much you can do.
[01:40:44.000 --> 01:40:53.000]  If you go if you go to the court and raise a ruckus, they're going to give the kids to the mother.
[01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:59.000]  And unless you have something really horrible to show the court about the mother, they're going to give the kids to the mother.
[01:40:59.000 --> 01:41:04.000]  They're going to give you visitation.
[01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  I have, she's a hoarder, you know, those people that like trash.
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:20.000]  And she would never take care of them. She would never feed them, bathe them.
[01:41:20.000 --> 01:41:31.000]  Okay, if you could establish that, you might get the court to give them to you. How old are these children?
[01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:37.000]  Two and a half and four and a half.
[01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:41.000]  Two and four and a half? Yes, sir.
[01:41:41.000 --> 01:41:56.000]  Okay. You know, every time I talk to someone who is at odds with their spouse, I tend to hear exactly the same things.
[01:41:56.000 --> 01:42:01.000]  The reason I say that is the judge does too.
[01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  If you have really good hard evidence to establish that, then if the children show abuse, you might have a small chance of getting the kids.
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:30.000]  I have witnesses, numerous witnesses that used to come over and see how she would leave the house and how she would let them run around and dirty diapers and feed them.
[01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  No, that's not going to get you. If the child doesn't have an extreme diaper rash, if the children haven't been repeatedly to the doctor, to the emergency room,
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:50.000]  all that complaining about her being a good mother is going to get you nowhere.
[01:42:50.000 --> 01:43:06.000]  Guarantee you, it'll get you nowhere. Every time a couple comes to odds this way, both sides come to the judge and tell the judge what a no good, rotten, lousy scoundrel the other is.
[01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:12.000]  The judge hears this over and over and over.
[01:43:12.000 --> 01:43:25.000]  If you can't come to him with some really good, hard evidence, you're going to start a fight you cannot win.
[01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  That may not be fair. You know, that may not even be right, but that's really how it is.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  I'm sorry, I wish I had an easy answer for you, but in family law, there's almost never an easy answer. That's why I would never have that position.
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:54.000]  I think we're about the end of what we can do here. Thank you for calling, Alfred. This is Randy Kelton, Debbie Stephen, Eddie Craig, Will Vareo.
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  You'll be right back on the other side.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Brave New Books?
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:20.000]  Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, Angie Everett Griffin.
[01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:24.000]  They even stock Interfood, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:31.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:35.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:44:35.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:46.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:59.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m., and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays. So give them a call at 512-480-2503, or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you're a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.000 --> 01:46:14.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  Okay, camera's lurking around, but come on, sing, Jerry, come on!
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  As we sow, so shall we reap
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:45.000]  The words of nutrition from so many fruits, those words that put on hold of me
[01:46:45.000 --> 01:47:00.000]  God bless your child, small steps to giant need, as we sow, so shall we reap
[01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:05.000]  So listen to this song, oh, oh, oh, oh
[01:47:05.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  Take our monkeys away and take me along the gondola
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:27.720]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelp and baby Steve with Daddy Craig. We're on the radio and
[01:47:27.720 --> 01:47:35.040]  we're talking. We're going to go to Julius in Texas. Julius, what do you have for us
[01:47:35.040 --> 01:47:43.480]  today? Hi, Randy. I have just gotten in my appellant brief for my impeding traffic debacle
[01:47:43.480 --> 01:47:53.400]  in the appellant court. And interestingly, I had just recently got the transcripts, which
[01:47:53.400 --> 01:47:58.560]  I never thought they would allow this to fly. I thought they would even take it out. I couldn't
[01:47:58.560 --> 01:48:05.160]  believe they left it in there. But the judge, who was the judge in this case, Judge Jenkins,
[01:48:05.160 --> 01:48:22.080]  I was at a pretrial. Oh, hearing boy? Yeah, you got it. You got it. And so I'm in a pretrial
[01:48:22.080 --> 01:48:27.120]  and I am objecting to the notice of the complaint because they don't give you the
[01:48:27.120 --> 01:48:32.320]  complaint notice. You know, they always notice you on the day of the pretrial instead of at
[01:48:32.320 --> 01:48:40.800]  least one day prior or prior to it. So the judge is in there and it's on record. He states that
[01:48:40.800 --> 01:48:46.800]  he doesn't know what a proceeding is. He said, and I quote, you have an appealable issue here
[01:48:46.800 --> 01:48:54.520]  if you decide to take it to appeal, but I don't know what a proceeding is. And you know, here I
[01:48:54.520 --> 01:48:59.840]  am in a proceeding. It's a pretrial and it's guaranteed to be a proceeding because even
[01:48:59.840 --> 01:49:09.040]  according to the municipal court rules, 7.1 says that the pretrial is the time to raise issues
[01:49:09.040 --> 01:49:16.640]  about the sufficiency of the criminal complaint and the law from which it is drawn. So therefore,
[01:49:16.640 --> 01:49:22.680]  it's the only time you have to raise the issues about the complaint for any reason. Therefore,
[01:49:22.680 --> 01:49:30.840]  the pretrial has to be a proceeding pursuant code of criminal procedure chapter 45.018b.
[01:49:30.840 --> 01:49:39.320]  So therefore, it was a proceeding. I mean, that's pretty much, I mean, it's a given. So it's on
[01:49:39.320 --> 01:49:43.960]  record now, it gets worse because it's on record that he doesn't, he admits that he doesn't know
[01:49:43.960 --> 01:49:51.280]  what a proceeding is. He's claiming that he thinks the proceeding is the trial on the merits. He
[01:49:51.280 --> 01:49:57.840]  says, but I could be wrong. We'll leave this one up to the appeal courts to decide. And then he
[01:49:57.840 --> 01:50:06.520]  goes on the court, I will call them tomorrow to find out. But he never does, right? And he
[01:50:06.520 --> 01:50:12.760]  bulldozes me through that proceeding. And then on the trial on the merits, as soon as they open
[01:50:12.760 --> 01:50:20.600]  the case, I objected because the prosecuting attorney comes right out the shooting gate and
[01:50:20.600 --> 01:50:27.720]  says, all issues about war were decided in the pretrial. And I made a blanket dig,
[01:50:27.720 --> 01:50:34.720]  a whopping objection. I said, nothing has been decided. Wait a minute, wait a minute,
[01:50:34.720 --> 01:50:43.280]  you are getting really bad echo. Do you have on a headset? No, I don't. Is that any better?
[01:50:43.280 --> 01:50:50.760]  Okay, I'm not sure where you're getting the echo. Okay, that's much better. That's better. Okay. So,
[01:50:50.760 --> 01:50:56.560]  so yeah, okay, so the pretrial, he admits he doesn't know what a proceeding is,
[01:50:56.560 --> 01:51:02.480]  but he's supposed to contact the county court of law for direction on what a proceeding is. He
[01:51:02.480 --> 01:51:09.240]  probably never did that. And then opens the jury trial, which is like a month or so later. The
[01:51:09.240 --> 01:51:15.200]  prosecutor opens it and tries to shut me down with emotion and limiting, claiming that I can't
[01:51:15.200 --> 01:51:21.440]  bring up any issues in the jury trial concerning law whatsoever, because all these issues had been
[01:51:21.440 --> 01:51:27.600]  decided in the pretrial. Now, that should give me a nice whopping bar grievance against that
[01:51:27.600 --> 01:51:39.960]  prosecutor and themselves against it. So he's trying to force me, they forced me actually
[01:51:39.960 --> 01:51:47.880]  through that trial on the merits. And also they never disclosed the charge to me until the very
[01:51:47.880 --> 01:51:53.600]  last minutes when the officer was on the stand. But go ahead, Randy, you wanted to say something
[01:51:53.600 --> 01:52:05.520]  before we go. No, no, go ahead. Okay. Okay, Jenkins said he didn't know what to do in a
[01:52:05.520 --> 01:52:13.680]  hearing. Jenkins said that I have an appealable issue here of when it concerns notice of the
[01:52:13.680 --> 01:52:22.400]  complaint. If he only knew what a proceeding was, because he said in my pretrial transcripts,
[01:52:22.400 --> 01:52:29.240]  he doesn't know what a proceeding is. If you should have told him, if you don't know what you're
[01:52:29.240 --> 01:52:38.240]  doing, get down off that bench and cause to be appointed a competent jurist to which I have a
[01:52:38.240 --> 01:52:46.240]  right in the first instance. Right, and I didn't do that. Exactly, exactly. But he says I'm, you
[01:52:46.240 --> 01:52:52.720]  know, in the pre-trial transcripts, he states that he was going to contact the county court at
[01:52:52.720 --> 01:52:59.400]  law tomorrow, meaning the day after my pre-trial. But he never did that, right? Comes to the jury
[01:52:59.400 --> 01:53:07.840]  trial. They try to bulldoze me through that and violate my right to, you know, this issue,
[01:53:07.840 --> 01:53:14.160]  which is the cornerstone. Okay, have you filed a judicial conduct complaint against him?
[01:53:14.160 --> 01:53:20.320]  I have not against him yet, because I was waiting to get the transcripts. Now that I have the
[01:53:20.320 --> 01:53:27.400]  transcripts, I have it in writing, you see. So I'm going to do that. Okay, get that in,
[01:53:27.400 --> 01:53:36.880]  because we're going to need that. We're going to talk to some legislators about some proposed
[01:53:36.880 --> 01:53:43.040]  legislation, and the State Commission on Judicial Conduct is up for sunset this term.
[01:53:43.040 --> 01:53:57.160]  Right. So they're likely to have a motivation to do something to show the legislative committees
[01:53:57.160 --> 01:54:03.880]  that they're actually doing their jobs. So it's a real good time to start filing on these guys.
[01:54:03.880 --> 01:54:16.720]  And I suggest that you, with your complaint, you also file a criminal affidavit, because on the
[01:54:16.720 --> 01:54:27.520]  commission, there are two judges, and the filing of your complaint will get your issue before
[01:54:27.520 --> 01:54:35.120]  those two judges. And if the judge fails to act on the complaint, then you file a criminal
[01:54:35.120 --> 01:54:42.120]  affidavit against the judge. On the commission, that'll drive them nuts. Yeah, and I already
[01:54:42.120 --> 01:54:47.040]  set them up for a speeding one that I had before. I told you about that, and I filed
[01:54:47.040 --> 01:54:51.840]  four judicial conduct complaints against two different judges, and in all four of them,
[01:54:51.840 --> 01:54:57.320]  I filed the criminal charges right in the complaint. That's what I did on the speeding.
[01:54:57.320 --> 01:55:01.360]  And I'm going to look now for the Jenkins on the impeding as well, and they're going
[01:55:01.360 --> 01:55:10.280]  to get hammered with that, because now the beauty is those two, those four criminal judicial
[01:55:10.280 --> 01:55:17.280]  conduct complaints hinged upon this specific pretrial, and I can show the court that the
[01:55:17.280 --> 01:55:23.720]  pretrial was hogwash, a bunch of hooey, because the judge didn't know what a proceeding was.
[01:55:23.720 --> 01:55:29.280]  So now I'm going to ask them to reopen those judicial complaints, but I've already filed
[01:55:29.280 --> 01:55:35.760]  the criminal charges in them for those other two judges. So now I've got to do the Jenkins.
[01:55:35.760 --> 01:55:39.960]  I want to throw the criminal complaint in that one, and I'm going to get them all in
[01:55:39.960 --> 01:55:45.200]  there. So I'll have about five judicial conduct complaints, each with criminal complaints in
[01:55:45.200 --> 01:55:53.640]  them. Wonderful. Maybe we can get something rocking and rolling. Yeah, and there are hinged
[01:55:53.640 --> 01:55:59.800]  upon the Jenkins pretrial in which you have a sitting judge admitting he doesn't know
[01:55:59.800 --> 01:56:05.080]  what a proceeding is. He doesn't know what a proceeding is, and I have it in the transcripts
[01:56:05.080 --> 01:56:06.960]  to prove it.
[01:56:06.960 --> 01:56:13.560]  You know, I've been before Jenkins, and the only reason I haven't went after him is I
[01:56:13.560 --> 01:56:23.120]  just haven't had time to pursue him. Right. But we really need to get rid of some of these
[01:56:23.120 --> 01:56:24.440]  charged judges.
[01:56:24.440 --> 01:56:28.880]  Exactly. I mean, you're in a proceeding, and you don't know what a proceeding is.
[01:56:28.880 --> 01:56:34.480]  It's just amazing, and it's like, there's no, this man's a butt's brandy. I mean, it
[01:56:34.480 --> 01:56:41.200]  was absolutely had to be a proceeding. It had to be. And even, you know, what else proves
[01:56:41.200 --> 01:56:47.360]  this is the way the prosecutor acted, because he says a lie right out the shooting gate
[01:56:47.360 --> 01:56:56.360]  in my jury trial, that all decisions were made in the pretrial. There you go. The pretrial
[01:56:56.360 --> 01:57:02.880]  is it. Boom. He can't get around it, but that's not a proceeding. No way. Can't do
[01:57:02.880 --> 01:57:18.560]  it. Incompetent. Well, you're in a really good shot at him. Yeah. Just stay after him.
[01:57:18.560 --> 01:57:24.640]  If we get more people doing this, we'll eventually get them. Yeah. Now, see what's going to happen.
[01:57:24.640 --> 01:57:30.280]  I told you the first round of criminal complaints, I mean, judicial complaints that I did on
[01:57:30.280 --> 01:57:35.160]  the speeding thing where they shot me back a letter, and they said to me, well, this
[01:57:35.160 --> 01:57:40.800]  is all, you know, a matter of judicial discretion. We don't see any errors here and everything.
[01:57:40.800 --> 01:57:46.440]  Well, they're going to see a bunch of errors from the Jenkins pretrial and see what they
[01:57:46.440 --> 01:57:51.360]  say about that. But I think, you know, they just trying to cover up for these judges.
[01:57:51.360 --> 01:57:58.640]  They're all incompetent down there. They're all. Was that, I think they get, you know,
[01:57:58.640 --> 01:58:02.560]  they don't care about anything but collecting money. We, you know, we know that we just
[01:58:02.560 --> 01:58:08.560]  got to make things costly for them. And if we get enough complaints against Jenkins,
[01:58:08.560 --> 01:58:13.200]  he'll become a liability and they'll have to get rid of it. So we need to get a lot
[01:58:13.200 --> 01:58:17.760]  of complaints against all of them. Okay. Hang on. We're about to go to our top of the hour
[01:58:17.760 --> 01:58:22.720]  break. This is Randy Kelton, Debra Stephens, Eddie Craig. We move our radio, our call
[01:58:22.720 --> 01:58:29.640]  in number 512-646-1984. Give us a call. It really starts building up toward the end.
[01:58:29.640 --> 01:58:39.560]  We have Kim in Texas, Dan in Connecticut, and Messica. I'll have to have you pronounce
[01:58:39.560 --> 01:58:45.520]  that one. We'll pick you up on the other side. This is Randy Kelton, Debra Stephens,
[01:58:45.520 --> 01:58:52.520]  Eddie Craig. We'll be right back.
[01:59:45.520 --> 01:59:55.520]  We'll be right back.