ROL_2012-12-10_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  Blame it on bottled water or changing tastes, but in the U.S. sales of milk have slumped
[00:08.000 --> 00:10.000]  to their lowest level in decades.
[00:10.000 --> 00:16.000]  Like Dr. Catherine Albrecht, in a moment I'll talk about why Americans are drinking far less milk.
[00:16.000 --> 00:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.000 --> 00:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:27.000 --> 00:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:35.000 --> 00:42.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.000 --> 00:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[00:45.000 --> 00:52.000]  Chocolate chip cookies and bowls of cereal must be feeling lonely because milk consumption in America is slumped to an all-time low,
[00:52.000 --> 00:56.000]  with more than half of adults no longer drinking it at all.
[00:56.000 --> 01:05.000]  Last year, total milk beverage sales were about 6 billion gallons, the lowest since 1984, far behind soda, bottled water, and beer.
[01:05.000 --> 01:06.000]  So what's going on?
[01:06.000 --> 01:08.000]  Consumer tastes have changed.
[01:08.000 --> 01:15.000]  Energy drinks and bottled teas have arrived and the public is afraid of the antibiotics and synthetic hormones used on cows.
[01:15.000 --> 01:18.000]  But don't worry, milk lovers, there is some good news.
[01:18.000 --> 01:23.000]  Organic milk sales are up 20% even while regular milk sales fell.
[01:23.000 --> 01:28.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:33.000 --> 01:39.000]  PowerPoint is crept into our lives and reached the level of near obsession in corporate America.
[01:39.000 --> 01:41.000]  Are we going overboard with it?
[01:41.000 --> 01:46.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with a commentary on how PowerPoint erodes critical thinking.
[01:46.000 --> 01:47.000]  Next.
[01:47.000 --> 01:50.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:50.000 --> 01:53.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:53.000 --> 01:58.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:58.000 --> 02:00.000]  So protect your rights.
[02:00.000 --> 02:04.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:04.000 --> 02:05.000]  Privacy.
[02:05.000 --> 02:06.000]  It's worth hanging on to.
[02:06.000 --> 02:13.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:13.000 --> 02:16.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:16.000 --> 02:19.000]  We've all experienced it.
[02:19.000 --> 02:20.000]  Death by PowerPoint.
[02:20.000 --> 02:25.000]  Microsoft's presentation program has turned countless meetings into mind-numbing boredom.
[02:25.000 --> 02:27.000]  Got a product idea?
[02:27.000 --> 02:28.000]  Do a PowerPoint.
[02:28.000 --> 02:29.000]  Trouble in the battlefield?
[02:29.000 --> 02:30.000]  PowerPoint again.
[02:30.000 --> 02:31.000]  Ugg.
[02:31.000 --> 02:36.000]  Unless it's creatively spiffed up with lots of pictures, PowerPoint can be the death of a meeting.
[02:36.000 --> 02:43.000]  It relieves the lazy speaker from having to actually write a thoughtful speech or convey a persuasive argument.
[02:43.000 --> 02:47.000]  Too often, instead of analysis, we get mind-numbing bullet points.
[02:47.000 --> 02:50.000]  The key is never to put your speech up on the screen.
[02:50.000 --> 02:55.000]  Use lots of pictures and never, ever, never read from a slide.
[02:55.000 --> 03:13.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[03:25.000 --> 03:54.000]  All right, folks, good evening.
[03:54.000 --> 03:57.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the Monday Night Traffic Show.
[03:57.000 --> 03:59.000]  I am your host, Eddie Craig.
[03:59.000 --> 04:03.000]  It is December 10th, 2012.
[04:03.000 --> 04:04.000]  All right.
[04:04.000 --> 04:14.000]  If you remember, on last Monday's show, I was going through the original 1836 Constitution for the Republic of Texas.
[04:14.000 --> 04:16.000]  We were going through several parts of it.
[04:16.000 --> 04:25.000]  The last thing I was reading was the Declaration of Rights, which is the original version of the Bill of Rights in the Texas Constitution.
[04:25.000 --> 04:31.000]  Now, I'm not 100% positive which one we left off on, but I know which one I'm going to start with.
[04:31.000 --> 05:01.000]  And just so you can follow along, just like last time, if you wish to do so, the web address we're at is tarleton-t-a-r-l-t-o-n-dot-law-l-a-w-dot-u-tex-s-dot-e-d-u-forward-slash-constitutions-forward-slash-text-forward-slash-c-c-rights-dot-html-and-rights-t-o-n-dot-l-t-o-n-dot-l-t-o-n-dot-l-t-o-n-dot-l-t-o-n-dot-l-t-o-n-dot-l-t-o-n-dot-l-t-o-n-dot-l-t-o-n-dot-l-t-o-n-dot-l-t-o-n-dot-l-t-
[05:01.000 --> 05:08.000]  This has a capitalized R. If it's a UNIX workstation or a server that is running on that will be relevant, if not, great.
[05:08.000 --> 05:18.000]  Okay, now I'm going to start with the fifth item in the Declaration of Rights.
[05:18.000 --> 05:42.000]  The people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and possessions from all unreasonable searches or seizures, and no warrant shall issue to search any place or seize any person or thing without describing the place to be searched or the person or thing to be seized without probable cause supported by oath or affirmation.
[05:42.000 --> 06:05.000]  Now, for those of you that were in attendance this last legislative session in 2011, when we went down to testify on a couple of these bills they were trying to pass, there was this moronic legislator that was attempting to make it where they could do the Mothers Against Drunk Driving sobriety checkpoints here in Texas.
[06:05.000 --> 06:28.000]  Now, this idiot, and I really don't have another name for him because this was the dumbest argument I have ever heard somebody that supposedly represents all of the people, not just the select group or PAC, but all of the people in the way he argued this.
[06:28.000 --> 06:55.000]  When we made the argument that they were asking for illegal search and seizures without warrant by instituting these drunk driving checkpoints, this legislator had the aneurysm thought, that's the best way I can describe it because it's a dysfunction of the brain to even begin to approach this argument from the direction he did.
[06:55.000 --> 07:16.000]  But his argument in its entirety was that the Constitution only prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, his argument being, of course, the opposite of that, that it does nothing to stop reasonable searches and seizures.
[07:16.000 --> 07:30.000]  Well, two big problems. First off, who gets to decide what's reasonable? The government or the individual to whom it's being done?
[07:30.000 --> 07:53.000]  We all know who the answer to that or the response to that is going to be in the long run. If they have that power, then they will simply declare that any search and seizure they wish to perform without a warrant is automatically reasonable and the burden of proof to prove it was unreasonable will be against the person that it was performed on.
[07:53.000 --> 08:16.000]  That's exactly how they'll do it. They've already proven that's how they'll do it because they're doing it with so many other things right now. Perfect example, the requirement that for those engaging in transportation to shoulder the burden of proof in the accusation of not maintaining financial responsibility.
[08:16.000 --> 08:41.000]  601.053 of the transportation code by legislative mandate, which makes this a bill of pains and penalties under any reasonable definition of that term has declared in 601.053 that if the individual accused does not produce evidence that they have complied,
[08:41.000 --> 08:59.000]  they will be presumed to be in violation of the statute. Now, just how many different ways can we possibly violate the fundamental due process rights of innocent until proven guilty.
[08:59.000 --> 09:12.000]  The burden of proof is on the accuser, not the defender, and that you cannot be compelled to produce evidence or information that can be used against you.
[09:12.000 --> 09:34.000]  I mean, three of the most important tenets of due process are wiped away in one legislative act and we're to presume that government will be doing its dead level best to not find any search and seizure reasonable by default.
[09:34.000 --> 09:45.000]  Okay, let me put this in a very simple way for just about anybody.
[09:45.000 --> 10:10.000]  Every search and seizure without a warrant supported by probable cause and sworn affidavit is unreasonable on its face. No warrant unreasonable end of discussion.
[10:10.000 --> 10:20.000]  Because if the government is free to declare what is reasonable, then it will all always be reasonable.
[10:20.000 --> 10:35.000]  It's never failed to be otherwise. It may take them some time to get there, but eventually the Kool-Aid will have its proper effect and the people will come to accept it just like they have everything else that's being done to them.
[10:35.000 --> 10:53.000]  Can you imagine the 1940s and the 1950s if there had been something like the TSA at all of the immigration ports or all of the places where the ships would sail out to foreign countries?
[10:53.000 --> 11:04.000]  Do you think anybody living in America would have tolerated being handled like TSA does people today?
[11:04.000 --> 11:19.000]  No, I guarantee you right now there would be a lot of government employees floating face down in the harbor. Had they tried that in that time frame, can you imagine in the 1800s them trying that?
[11:19.000 --> 11:26.000]  Nope, would have never worked. That had been shot before they got so much as halfway down somebody's pants.
[11:26.000 --> 11:55.000]  And yet, look at where we are. We are worse than cattle going through the slaughterhouse, folks. We line up in front of their death dealing x-ray machines, or we line up in front of the gloved individuals who get off on touching people inappropriately because it gives them some sense of power that they wouldn't otherwise have at McDonald's
[11:55.000 --> 12:09.000]  where they ought to be employed because they didn't have the aptitude and the desire to better themselves so they could actually get a good job.
[12:09.000 --> 12:28.000]  I mean, the only people today that's looking for government jobs are those that crave the power or the ability to do as little as possible for a paycheck because I have yet to see any of them actually earning it.
[12:28.000 --> 12:39.000]  I don't care what the job is. Just like professional athletes, you know, I can appreciate that they're skilled at playing a game.
[12:39.000 --> 12:56.000]  But not for one minute do I believe any professional sports player of any kind or any coach or any other person associated with the activity should be drawing a six-digit salary.
[12:56.000 --> 13:16.000]  It's like any other choice in life. If you choose a job where you could wind up having a very short career, such as window washing on skyscrapers, then don't be surprised if you don't live long enough to enjoy it or it winds up hurting a few years down the road where you have to change jobs.
[13:16.000 --> 13:41.000]  Welcome to reality. But to pay you millions of dollars a year to play a game, I don't think so. Not when I've got soldiers fighting for my rights in foreign lands that are getting by on less than minimum wage when you sit down and tally it all up by the number of hours a day they work and the risk they take
[13:41.000 --> 13:54.000]  and the things they have to suffer through in the name of freedom. That don't get me wrong. I'm not in agreement with the reason why they're being sent there, but that's not their fault.
[13:54.000 --> 14:23.000]  Again, it's those worthless, elitist individuals that think they have the right to decide the fate of others for their own profiteering and gain that have put them there. And I got news for you. As much as I dislike the idea of having to kill a fellow human being, if you throw me in a box where it's kill or be killed, I'm not going to be the first one to die if I can possibly prevent it.
[14:23.000 --> 14:37.000]  So, you know, on the off chance that everybody throws their weapons down and refuses to fight, then what happens? Well, I guess that really depends on how badly the elitists need that war.
[14:37.000 --> 14:57.000]  Will they send in more? Will they do something to get rid of those that are there in order to incite the ones that they're going to send to replace them into thinking that it's fight or die time because the guys that came before you, we put them in there and they got wiped out by the other side when in fact they all refused to fight and we wiped them out to incite the new guys.
[14:57.000 --> 15:16.000]  It's like what I went over in class yesterday. When you sit down and look at the way the world is currently set up and the way it's being manipulated, everything is one big spider web. Everything is connected to everything else at some point about what's going on.
[15:16.000 --> 15:33.000]  And the whole purpose of tweaking the web in one place is to send a signal about what you need to happen in another place. And it's all working out that way. This is how the elitists are keeping everything connected so that they can play it out as they need it.
[15:33.000 --> 15:53.000]  But I have found there's one thing about spider webs. That is that they generally are fairly easy to tear down as long as you're aware where they are and they're not so big that you can't get out of them.
[15:53.000 --> 16:08.000]  One thing that I've never seen a spider have to cope with is when a swarm of flies all decide to attack his web. Would the web hold them if they all hit it in mass versus one at a time? Who knows?
[16:08.000 --> 16:16.000]  That's an experiment without the conduct one of these days. But we can do that folks. We just have to know what's going on.
[16:16.000 --> 16:38.000]  This bill of rights in this original Constitution for the Republic of Texas is still extremely valid. Why? Because this document didn't give us those rights. Nor did the 1845, the 1865, the 1866, the 1876. They didn't give them to us. We had them already.
[16:38.000 --> 16:54.000]  We'll cover more of that on the other side. Alright folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984. This is Eddie Craig, Monday Night Traffic Show. We'll be right back on the other side of this break so hang in there.
[17:08.000 --> 17:24.000]  The MSP's and GMO really ain't the way to go. There's a better way I've seen. It's called Tangy Tangerine.
[17:24.000 --> 17:40.000]  And we're all breaking Tangy Tangerine, Tangy Tangerine, Tangy Tangerine.
[17:54.000 --> 18:14.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too.
[18:14.000 --> 18:33.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.000 --> 18:49.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 19:11.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:11.000 --> 19:40.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio. Alright, let's get a little bit more of this here and let's find out what the rights we have.
[19:40.000 --> 19:48.000]  The rights we have actually are as far as constitution is concerned that our public servants were never supposed to touch.
[19:48.000 --> 20:02.000]  Number six, in all criminal prosecutions, notice the word all, a-l-l, the accused shall have the right of being heard by himself or counsel or both.
[20:02.000 --> 20:26.000]  Now let's stop there for one second. Let's discuss something that the judges in the courts of Texas have decreed by judicial fiat because this specifically negates the doctrine they've established, which is, Texas does not recognize bifurcated representation.
[20:26.000 --> 20:39.000]  Now what they mean by that is that if you have an attorney, you can't speak. Your attorney is the only one that can speak.
[20:39.000 --> 20:51.000]  Now get that? And if you relegate the attorney to second chair, then you have to speak. You can only talk to them and get advice, but they can't argue for you.
[20:51.000 --> 21:04.000]  In other words, you don't get to get heard by your counsel, yourself, or both of you, like the Constitution here says, it's one or the other.
[21:04.000 --> 21:24.000]  Now, slight problem both in this version of the Constitution and in the 1876 version. Article 1, Section 29 specifically says that everything in this bill of rights is forever removed from the general powers of government.
[21:24.000 --> 21:43.000]  It does not say from the general powers of the legislature. It doesn't say general powers of the executive or general powers of the judicial. It encompasses government, regardless of department or, in other terms, branch.
[21:43.000 --> 21:59.000]  And it specifically states that anything the government does that is in violation of this bill of rights or any other provision of the Texas Constitution is automatically null and void on its face.
[21:59.000 --> 22:09.000]  Now that right there takes this judicial doctrine and dumps it like the garbage it is.
[22:09.000 --> 22:25.000]  Now, I want to go off color here for just one second. Deborah, try not to get too upset with me here. I'm not going to go too far off the beaten path, but, you know, some of these people we've gotten public office, I want everyone out there to understand this.
[22:25.000 --> 22:36.000]  I do not respect these people. I do not give them 100% and let them work their way down. When they take public office, they're going to prove to me they deserve it before I give them any credit for anything.
[22:36.000 --> 22:40.000]  And so far, none of these people have been able to do that.
[22:40.000 --> 22:58.000]  So my philosophy when it comes to public servants, especially those that are judges and prosecutors and legislators and any of the executive officers like our idiotic governor, okay, you people didn't just fall out of the stupid tree.
[22:58.000 --> 23:07.000]  You people got drugged through the whole dumbass forest, okay, and you hit every tree on the way out.
[23:07.000 --> 23:19.000]  Because if you can come up with this kind of doctrine right in the face of the Bill of Rights or the Declaration of Rights in the Texas Constitution, it says you can't do that.
[23:19.000 --> 23:30.000]  And think that's okay. There's something seriously wrong with your concept of public servant.
[23:30.000 --> 23:34.000]  That's just the way it is.
[23:34.000 --> 23:44.000]  Serve the public, not yourselves, not your power trips, not your power plays, not your investments, none of that.
[23:44.000 --> 23:50.000]  Your job is to ensure that the rights of the people are protected.
[23:50.000 --> 23:58.000]  Now, how are these courts getting around this? Because they have abandoned the concept of people first.
[23:58.000 --> 24:12.000]  They have integrated to themselves the concept of legitimate government purpose, okay, or legitimate government need.
[24:12.000 --> 24:18.000]  Well, there's this rule in politics about the law of necessity.
[24:18.000 --> 24:25.000]  The law of necessity trumps any and all other law.
[24:25.000 --> 24:34.000]  And the courts have used their judicial powers to ensure that doctrine is followed to the letter.
[24:34.000 --> 25:03.000]  If the government doesn't have a power or an authority, but government believes it needs that power or authority, then the courts, through the doctrine of necessity, will start making opinions and rulings that favor that government need, which basically translates into a want, not a need.
[25:03.000 --> 25:13.000]  It astounds me that these people think our government didn't work the way it was when these rules were originally put in place.
[25:13.000 --> 25:27.000]  I mean, it worked just fine, right? The criminals still got caught and still got punished, and we have much better ways of detecting them now than the founding fathers or anybody that came in between them and us ever did.
[25:27.000 --> 25:42.000]  So you can't tell me that we've improved the process of how to identify the wrongdoer, but we can't keep the process of protecting the innocent in order to catch the wrongdoer.
[25:42.000 --> 26:08.000]  Something seriously screwed up about that perception, okay? And yet, we the people sit silently by and allow this erosion of everything that we hold near and dear to our hearts in the form of rights, life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, justice,
[26:08.000 --> 26:26.000]  and individual ability to acquire and use our own property while not inflicting harm on anyone else or their property, and we've just let it erode down into bedrock.
[26:26.000 --> 26:43.000]  It used to be fertile farmland, but we've let all of these doctrines and actions by our government wash away all that fertile topsoil and all we've got left now to do anything with is bedrock.
[26:43.000 --> 26:54.000]  We are down to the last vestige of that before they start dynamiting the bedrock even and mining it of all of its rich minerals that still belong to us.
[26:54.000 --> 27:02.000]  And we're going to sit there and watch them strip mine everything that we call our rights right out from under us.
[27:02.000 --> 27:10.000]  And we're going to die with a whimper as the Russian newspapers and news articles are all saying that's already happened.
[27:10.000 --> 27:20.000]  Anybody that would put Obama in office twice? I mean, come on. We didn't put him there. The system's rigged. We know the system's rigged.
[27:20.000 --> 27:32.000]  What are we doing about it? Groping, complaining, and moaning. That's all we're doing. We're just sitting back here going, oh, well, we're stuck again.
[27:32.000 --> 27:43.000]  Sound like dad blamed Eeyore in an episode of Winnie the Pooh. Just resign yourself to whatever's coming next because you just can't do nothing about it.
[27:43.000 --> 27:53.000]  Folks, if that's the way the majority of us felt, why are you listening to this show? Why do you listen to any of the shows on this network? Why do we have to be here?
[27:53.000 --> 28:05.000]  If all that we've got going for us is talk, then we've got nothing. We've got thoughts and ideas that no one has the backbone to implement.
[28:05.000 --> 28:23.000]  What good does that do us as individuals or as Americans? Doesn't do us any good at all. What good was writing down everything in this bill of rights if we're going to let those that serve us and are supposed to protect this document with their lives, their wealth, and their sacred honor?
[28:23.000 --> 28:38.000]  Hidden at the oath the Founding Fathers took? When was the last time that you had a public servant willing to put everything he has on the line to do his job correctly?
[28:38.000 --> 29:03.000]  They're dang few and far between from what I've seen. I can think of two and three quarters. The two I can think of is Representative Simpson here in Texas, Representative Ron Paul, and of course Rand Paul up to a particular point.
[29:03.000 --> 29:13.000]  But they're the only ones I've seen that are willing to stand in the face of adversity no matter how adverse it's become to do what they knew to be right.
[29:13.000 --> 29:26.000]  Haven't seen another one do it yet. Where's our support for these people? Somebody convinced David Simpson he needs to run for Speaker here in the legislature. Great!
[29:26.000 --> 29:36.000]  Now get on your representatives behind the supporting. Because he's going to need it. The powers of being don't want somebody like him in charge.
[29:36.000 --> 29:41.000]  And without us being right there to make sure he gets it, he won't.
[29:41.000 --> 30:00.000]  All right folks, we'll be right back after this break. This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back on the other side so y'all just hang in there.
[30:00.000 --> 30:07.000]  This is Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:07.000 --> 30:12.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:12.000 --> 30:15.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:15.000 --> 30:18.000]  And thousands of my fellow force responders have died.
[30:18.000 --> 30:19.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:19.000 --> 30:20.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:20.000 --> 30:21.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[30:21.000 --> 30:22.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:22.000 --> 30:24.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:24.000 --> 30:27.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[30:27.000 --> 30:30.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:30.000 --> 30:38.000]  HempUSA.org has a revolutionary wonder food for detoxing the body and rebuilding the immune system.
[30:38.000 --> 30:46.000]  Micro-plant powder can help unclog arteries and soften heart valves while removing heavy metals, virus, fungus, bacteria, and parasites.
[30:46.000 --> 30:50.000]  Plus, it cleans and purifies the blood, lungs, stomach, and colon.
[30:50.000 --> 30:53.000]  Keep your body clean with micro-plant powder.
[30:53.000 --> 31:00.000]  Visit us at hempUSA.org or call 908-69-12608 today.
[31:00.000 --> 31:06.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy.
[31:06.000 --> 31:09.000]  And neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[31:09.000 --> 31:12.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[31:12.000 --> 31:13.000]  Brave New Books?
[31:13.000 --> 31:14.000]  Yes.
[31:14.000 --> 31:20.000]  Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[31:20.000 --> 31:24.000]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[31:24.000 --> 31:27.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[31:27.000 --> 31:28.000]  Go check it out for yourself.
[31:28.000 --> 31:32.000]  It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street just south of UT.
[31:32.000 --> 31:36.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[31:36.000 --> 31:43.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[31:43.000 --> 31:47.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[31:47.000 --> 31:52.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[31:52.000 --> 31:59.000]  So get them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[32:01.000 --> 32:06.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[32:06.000 --> 32:10.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[32:36.000 --> 32:42.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:06.000 --> 33:12.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:36.000 --> 33:42.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[34:06.000 --> 34:11.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[34:37.000 --> 34:44.000]  All of the things that have to be proven at trial that the crime actually occurred.
[34:44.000 --> 34:51.000]  Let's say, for instance, that you see someone shoot and kill another person.
[34:51.000 --> 35:00.000]  You don't have to know as the one making the allegation exactly what the prosecutor would have to prove in court to say,
[35:00.000 --> 35:06.000]  yeah, I saw that guy kill that guy with a gun.
[35:06.000 --> 35:15.000]  The job becomes the prosecutors to prove the necessary elements of the charge based upon the allegation you made.
[35:15.000 --> 35:21.000]  That's where the information or the indictment comes in, and that's what a presentment is,
[35:21.000 --> 35:30.000]  because the accused has the right to know what the prosecutor has to prove.
[35:30.000 --> 35:36.000]  And so each of the necessary elements are supposed to be listed in an indictment or information
[35:36.000 --> 35:43.000]  so that they can be determined whether or not they were proven at the evidentiary phase of a trial.
[35:43.000 --> 35:51.000]  So a complaint alone has never been required to list the elements.
[35:51.000 --> 35:56.000]  It's true in Chapter 15 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for anything above a Class C misdemeanor,
[35:56.000 --> 36:09.000]  and it's true in Chapter 45 under 45.019A regarding what has to be in an actual complaint for the purpose of a Class C fine-only misdemeanor case.
[36:09.000 --> 36:17.000]  Nowhere in statute does it say that a complaint must list all of the elements required to be proven.
[36:17.000 --> 36:26.000]  The only place it says that is in Chapter 20 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in relation to indictments.
[36:26.000 --> 36:32.000]  Then it says a little further down in Chapter 20 in relation to information,
[36:32.000 --> 36:41.000]  the requisites of what must be proven are the same for an information that they are for an indictment.
[36:41.000 --> 36:55.000]  So the only instrument that is required or instruments that are required to list all of the provable or required to be proven elements are indictments or information.
[36:55.000 --> 37:06.000]  That's exactly why a complaint alone is not and cannot ever be sufficient as a charging instrument.
[37:06.000 --> 37:09.000]  Let's look at the argument here for just a second.
[37:09.000 --> 37:16.000]  Let's say that they make the complaint alone, which is what they're doing in every municipal and JP court 99% of the time.
[37:16.000 --> 37:19.000]  They submit that and they say they're going to proceed on the complaint.
[37:19.000 --> 37:26.000]  Yet the complaint actually only says you're charged with speeding.
[37:26.000 --> 37:36.000]  Now if you make the accusation that the complaint is insufficient on its face because it does not list all of the elements required to be proven,
[37:36.000 --> 37:48.000]  then here is the only argument the judge can reasonably allow and the prosecution can reasonably make as to why your objection should be overruled.
[37:48.000 --> 37:59.000]  And that is, there is nothing in the statute that requires a complaint to list all of the elements required to be proven.
[37:59.000 --> 38:08.000]  Therefore, your objection to the substance in form of the complaint is overruled and we shall proceed.
[38:08.000 --> 38:24.000]  That argument alone is exactly why a criminal complaint is insufficient as a charging instrument, why it is a violation of criminal due process to attempt to prosecute on a complaint alone.
[38:24.000 --> 38:28.000]  How hard is this, judges?
[38:28.000 --> 38:31.000]  How hard?
[38:31.000 --> 38:33.000]  These are your arguments.
[38:33.000 --> 38:39.000]  These are the arguments you people have made since people have been trying to argue this back about you can't do it that way.
[38:39.000 --> 38:46.000]  You fabricated out of thin air for compelling governmental interest or need.
[38:46.000 --> 38:53.000]  A friend of mine popped up here and he put the maximum that are the maximum of law that I was looking at earlier.
[38:53.000 --> 39:03.000]  And this is how I read, maximum necessity makes lawful that which is otherwise unlawful.
[39:03.000 --> 39:12.000]  And who is it who always decrees government necessity but the court?
[39:12.000 --> 39:25.000]  The court will take and by necessity decree that what the government did that under the constitutional mandates is unlawful and illegal.
[39:25.000 --> 39:40.000]  And say because it is a governmental necessity in the eyes of the court, we will allow the government to trump the Constitution for that purpose.
[39:40.000 --> 39:44.000]  That's treason, people.
[39:44.000 --> 39:47.000]  Treason.
[39:47.000 --> 39:50.000]  Where are we?
[39:50.000 --> 39:57.000]  Sitting back there going, oh, the court screwed us again. We're just stuck. They made that decision. Now we got to live with it forever and ever.
[39:57.000 --> 40:00.000]  Why?
[40:00.000 --> 40:09.000]  Why was that judge not dragged from his home, tarred, feathered and thrown off a bridge?
[40:09.000 --> 40:14.000]  I mean, come on.
[40:14.000 --> 40:19.000]  Treason, people.
[40:19.000 --> 40:23.000]  And we just let them keep going and going and going.
[40:23.000 --> 40:31.000]  We have cops all over Austin that should be in prison and they're still drawing a paycheck.
[40:31.000 --> 40:43.000]  We have city commissioners, we have mayor, we have a city planner, not just in Austin but in virtually every city in Texas that think they are the kings and queens.
[40:43.000 --> 40:47.000]  And we're just the subject.
[40:47.000 --> 40:53.000]  Where are we when it comes to saying no? That is not how it works.
[40:53.000 --> 40:57.000]  How many people show up at these meetings they hold down at City Hall?
[40:57.000 --> 41:02.000]  How many people are in Austin, almost a million, seven hundred something thousand?
[41:02.000 --> 41:16.000]  And how many people actually take the time and effort to have a hand in the way the government of this city functions to go down there and say, no, no, you will not do that.
[41:16.000 --> 41:37.000]  And if you attempt to do that, you and your police force will be out on your behinds and we will have the sheriff, the only one around here that can enforce anything, and the only one that they better be enforcing is our right not to have to put up with you.
[41:37.000 --> 41:46.000]  Because don't forget, in Texas, the constables and the sheriff are judicial officers.
[41:46.000 --> 41:49.000]  They are not executive officers.
[41:49.000 --> 41:56.000]  They are created under Article 5 of the Texas Constitution right along with the judiciary.
[41:56.000 --> 42:11.000]  Okay, Article 3 legislative, Article 4 executive, Article 5 judicial, and the sheriff and constables are in the judicial.
[42:11.000 --> 42:17.000]  The only law they can enforce is the Constitution.
[42:17.000 --> 42:21.000]  They cannot enforce statute.
[42:21.000 --> 42:29.000]  They can't. Why? Because that's an executive function in their judicial people.
[42:29.000 --> 42:35.000]  Violates separation of powers doctrine in Article 2.
[42:35.000 --> 42:43.000]  The sheriff and the constable cannot perform executive functions of enforcing statute.
[42:43.000 --> 42:45.000]  How hard is that?
[42:45.000 --> 42:53.000]  It violates separation of powers.
[42:53.000 --> 43:00.000]  And I cannot possibly be one of only a handful of people that get this.
[43:00.000 --> 43:04.000]  I just can't. I'm not that damn smart.
[43:04.000 --> 43:06.000]  Okay?
[43:06.000 --> 43:10.000]  This is not rocket science.
[43:10.000 --> 43:14.000]  This is plain old common sense.
[43:14.000 --> 43:19.000]  A is never the same as B.
[43:19.000 --> 43:23.000]  What's another maximum of law?
[43:23.000 --> 43:30.000]  Something similar is never the same.
[43:30.000 --> 43:39.000]  So just because everything looks alike, feels alike, smells alike, they're not the same.
[43:39.000 --> 43:44.000]  This is the government we have versus the one we're supposed to have.
[43:44.000 --> 43:48.000]  They may look similar, but they are not the same.
[43:48.000 --> 43:50.000]  And there, folks, we're about to take another break.
[43:50.000 --> 43:55.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[43:55.000 --> 44:00.000]  We will be right back after this break.
[44:00.000 --> 44:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.000 --> 44:10.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course
[44:10.000 --> 44:14.000]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:14.000 --> 44:18.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.000 --> 44:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.000 --> 44:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.000 --> 44:33.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:33.000 --> 44:38.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:38.000 --> 44:42.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.000 --> 44:51.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:51.000 --> 45:00.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.000 --> 45:05.000]  The Oklahoma City bombing, top 10 reasons to question the official story,
[45:05.000 --> 45:09.000]  reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices.
[45:09.000 --> 45:14.000]  On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the writer truck
[45:14.000 --> 45:17.000]  report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators.
[45:17.000 --> 45:22.000]  The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone delivered the writer truck bomb
[45:22.000 --> 45:24.000]  to the Murr Building and detonated it.
[45:24.000 --> 45:28.000]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning,
[45:28.000 --> 45:32.000]  Dana Bradley, who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing,
[45:32.000 --> 45:38.000]  testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fateful John Doe number two, exiting the writer truck.
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing,
[45:44.000 --> 45:50.000]  no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing,
[45:50.000 --> 45:56.000]  including when he rented the writer truck, and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:56.000 --> 46:14.000]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:26.000 --> 46:44.000]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, and guess what? We have a caller.
[46:44.000 --> 46:52.000]  We're going to go now and talk for a minute to Doug in Texas. Doug, what can we do for you?
[46:52.000 --> 46:59.000]  Somebody bring him on because Firefox is not responding here to my click.
[46:59.000 --> 47:01.000]  Do what?
[47:01.000 --> 47:03.000]  Alright Doug, what's up? Sorry?
[47:03.000 --> 47:11.000]  Okay, what I was going to tell you is we lost Ron Paul as far as our congressman.
[47:11.000 --> 47:17.000]  He's retiring. He's going on to better and better things, and I've known him for quite a while.
[47:17.000 --> 47:26.000]  I'd say like 20 years or so. But they elected a guy, you know, Jason District,
[47:26.000 --> 47:35.000]  Ron Paul named Steve Stockman, who I met, and he's like Ron Paul on steroids.
[47:35.000 --> 47:52.000]  He is serious, serious, serious, constitutionalist. Everything Ron Paul is, but he's a little more dynamic than Ron.
[47:52.000 --> 47:57.000]  So that's good news.
[47:57.000 --> 48:00.000]  Alright, explain the dynamic.
[48:00.000 --> 48:10.000]  Well, he's a little, Ron is a great guy, a fantastic, wonderful person,
[48:10.000 --> 48:20.000]  but he's a little too much of a gentleman. I think Ron Paul is just a perfect gentleman.
[48:20.000 --> 48:31.000]  He pulls his punches, and they can quite, you know, just go out there and call a spade a spade.
[48:31.000 --> 48:38.000]  Yeah, well, I mean, I love Ron Paul. Do not get me wrong, and there are days when we need men like Ron Paul,
[48:38.000 --> 48:45.000]  and then there are days when we need men like Hacksaw Jim Dugan out of WWF too.
[48:45.000 --> 48:55.000]  Well, I'd say Steve Stockman is kind of a combination of the two, and he's kind of a...
[48:55.000 --> 49:04.000]  He has Ron Paul beliefs, but he'll get out there and, you know, just, hey, let's call it like this.
[49:04.000 --> 49:19.000]  Ron Paul is just a perfect gentleman, and he puts everything politely, and didn't quite have to, you know, get down this call a spade,
[49:19.000 --> 49:24.000]  and your scumbag, and this and that and other.
[49:24.000 --> 49:25.000]  So we...
[49:25.000 --> 49:28.000]  Well, he did that in his retirement speech. You know that, right?
[49:28.000 --> 49:35.000]  Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. He kind of let it all hang in there.
[49:35.000 --> 49:45.000]  And Steve Stockman will, I guarantee, he'll do the work that Ron Paul was doing.
[49:45.000 --> 49:50.000]  Let's say, you know, assassinate him or, you know, whatever.
[49:50.000 --> 50:00.000]  Whatever they tend to do to people that do the right thing, but I decided to let you know that I know both of the guys,
[50:00.000 --> 50:09.000]  and they're both fantastic, and Steve was in Congress for a little while, and then he got out,
[50:09.000 --> 50:19.000]  and he's back in it, and I think he'll be real well-served by Mr. Stockman.
[50:19.000 --> 50:21.000]  That's about it, Eddie.
[50:21.000 --> 50:23.000]  All right. Well, I appreciate your call, Ian.
[50:23.000 --> 50:24.000]  Uh-huh.
[50:24.000 --> 50:26.000]  All right. Thanks.
[50:26.000 --> 50:31.000]  All right. My Firefox is still behaving oddly, so do we have any other callers up on the board?
[50:31.000 --> 50:33.000]  Yeah, there's Jack in Texas.
[50:33.000 --> 50:34.000]  Okay. Would you go ahead and bring him in?
[50:34.000 --> 50:35.000]  Sure.
[50:35.000 --> 50:38.000]  Okay, Jack. Thanks for calling in.
[50:38.000 --> 50:40.000]  Oh, thank you, Eddie.
[50:40.000 --> 50:41.000]  Yes?
[50:41.000 --> 50:50.000]  Oh, thank you for taking my call. I'm a first-time listener. I've been listening for about maybe 15 or 20 minutes,
[50:50.000 --> 50:53.000]  and I heard your explanation of the Constitution.
[50:53.000 --> 51:04.000]  It is so simple, and I hope that I will be able to interpolate it somehow tomorrow to do my friends at work.
[51:04.000 --> 51:17.000]  I'm just amazed at our government and your ability to express the differentiation between what it was and what it should be
[51:17.000 --> 51:22.000]  and what it is now, and I just want to say thank you for what you're doing,
[51:22.000 --> 51:30.000]  and I hope that you all take contributions or how do y'all work?
[51:30.000 --> 51:35.000]  Actually, yeah, we do. We're pretty much user-supported by contributions and donations,
[51:35.000 --> 51:42.000]  and you can do that either at the ruleoflawradio.com website or the Logos Radio Network website.
[51:42.000 --> 51:51.000]  You can either make contributions directly to the network or you can make contributions directly to individuals on the network.
[51:51.000 --> 52:01.000]  And the first one is what? Ruleoflawradio.com.
[52:01.000 --> 52:09.000]  Thank you. I appreciate it. Y'all are doing wonderful work, and this will be my entree,
[52:09.000 --> 52:15.000]  and I can do what y'all are doing. I feel like a part of this already.
[52:15.000 --> 52:21.000]  Well, we're glad to have you as a first-time listener, most assuredly. The more people we have listening,
[52:21.000 --> 52:24.000]  the better off we're all going to be because the more educated we'll become.
[52:24.000 --> 52:33.000]  Now, as far as your comment on explaining it simply, it's not hard. You just have to understand the viewpoint perspective.
[52:33.000 --> 52:46.000]  The problem is, is government always looks at things from the side of, we want more power to do what we want to do, even though you intended to limit us in what we could do.
[52:46.000 --> 52:55.000]  Whereas I look at it as, you know what? This is my right to do, and you have the right to butt the hell out.
[52:55.000 --> 53:00.000]  And until I invite you, stay away.
[53:00.000 --> 53:08.000]  Well, yeah, but that's already entrenched, isn't it?
[53:08.000 --> 53:10.000]  Really?
[53:10.000 --> 53:18.000]  Well, isn't it? I mean, if we tell them that, they'll say, this way to yourself, sir.
[53:18.000 --> 53:26.000]  And just exactly how many of us would they be able to hold that way before we had them convinced that's not a very good way to go about things?
[53:26.000 --> 53:35.000]  Well, if I'm judging by my friends and cohorts, there wouldn't be very many.
[53:35.000 --> 53:42.000]  Yeah, if enough people just stand up and say, no, sorry, you're not going to do that, what would be the result?
[53:42.000 --> 53:57.000]  Yeah, well, I've felt this way a long time, but I never had a voice that I understood and felt like I was understanding enough. And thank you for doing this.
[53:57.000 --> 54:03.000]  I want to check out your website. Definitely going to give you some money for sure.
[54:03.000 --> 54:13.000]  Is there anything, have you got any information that you have on the website that I can download?
[54:13.000 --> 54:15.000]  In relation to what?
[54:15.000 --> 54:23.000]  Well, answers to questions that might be asked when you present your point of view.
[54:23.000 --> 54:39.000]  No, but we definitely have emails that you can send us those questions and everything on. And I try to respond back to those as much as I can, especially the people that ask legitimate questions about, well, what about this, that or the other?
[54:39.000 --> 54:56.000]  As long as it's not meant to pull a baiting response, I always try to respond to them. I'm not into debating people that obviously have an agenda of trying to just cause problems and don't get me wrong.
[54:56.000 --> 55:04.000]  I don't have a problem with adverse opinion. People are entitled to their opinion. You don't agree with me, that's fine.
[55:04.000 --> 55:12.000]  But at the same time, don't try to force me into your point of view when I can back up mine, but you cannot back up yours.
[55:12.000 --> 55:20.000]  Yeah, yeah. You know the most difficult part of talking to a liberal?
[55:20.000 --> 55:25.000]  Hearing what they have to say while their head is under water?
[55:25.000 --> 55:35.000]  No. When they try to interrupt you every other time, every other word or every other half-signets, you try to present in opposition to what they say.
[55:35.000 --> 55:39.000]  Hence the reason you hold them under the water while you're talking?
[55:39.000 --> 55:44.000]  Touché. Thank you. Thank you very much. That's a good picture.
[55:44.000 --> 55:46.000]  Yeah, I like it.
[55:46.000 --> 55:58.000]  Thank you. Mr. Craig, it's been an honor to speak with you. This won't be the last time I hope that we speak. Are you available?
[55:58.000 --> 56:09.000]  Well, I shouldn't ask this on air, but I will email you and ask perhaps if we can meet and maybe I can be of help.
[56:09.000 --> 56:11.000]  That would be fine.
[56:11.000 --> 56:13.000]  Wonderful. Thank you, sir.
[56:13.000 --> 56:15.000]  Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in. I greatly appreciate it.
[56:15.000 --> 56:17.000]  Me too. Bye-bye.
[56:17.000 --> 56:19.000]  Bye-bye.
[56:19.000 --> 56:24.000]  All right. Well, that was interesting. I like those kind of calls. Enthusiastic.
[56:24.000 --> 56:27.000]  Okay. Got anybody else up there, Deborah?
[56:27.000 --> 56:34.000]  Let me see. Let me check here.
[56:34.000 --> 56:36.000]  Yes, there's Gene in Texas.
[56:36.000 --> 56:37.000]  Okay. Can you bring them up?
[56:37.000 --> 56:38.000]  Yes.
[56:38.000 --> 56:40.000]  For some reason, I have absolutely lost all internet here.
[56:40.000 --> 56:42.000]  Okay. Okay, Gene.
[56:42.000 --> 56:50.000]  Yes, I appreciate your show tonight. I've been missing bits and pieces of it. I'm driving around on the grocery store and whatnot, and I've got to go in.
[56:50.000 --> 56:54.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. You're doing what?
[56:54.000 --> 56:57.000]  Yes, I really appreciate your show tonight.
[56:57.000 --> 56:59.000]  Yes.
[56:59.000 --> 57:02.000]  No, you said you're out and about doing what?
[57:02.000 --> 57:10.000]  Yes, grocery shopping and whatnot and going in and out of the store and everything, and I'm missing bits and pieces.
[57:10.000 --> 57:12.000]  I'm going to list them on the archives tomorrow.
[57:12.000 --> 57:13.000]  Okay.
[57:13.000 --> 57:19.000]  So I rule a lot of radio. Your engineer told me how to get there, so.
[57:19.000 --> 57:20.000]  All right.
[57:20.000 --> 57:25.000]  Anyways, I really appreciate it. Man, I'm better. I got to tell you.
[57:25.000 --> 57:27.000]  Well, we appreciate you listing in.
[57:27.000 --> 57:28.000]  Okay. Thank you, sir.
[57:28.000 --> 57:30.000]  Yes, sir.
[57:30.000 --> 57:32.000]  All right. Who else we got, Deborah?
[57:32.000 --> 57:33.000]  That's it.
[57:33.000 --> 57:41.000]  Come on, folks, call in. If I got no internet, I can't access the website to read the Constitution. I need callers, and I can't even see my caller board.
[57:41.000 --> 57:44.000]  I have no idea what's suddenly going on with my internet.
[57:44.000 --> 57:48.000]  I think the powers that be want to shut me up and they thought cutting off my internet would do it.
[57:48.000 --> 57:49.000]  Wrong.
[57:52.000 --> 57:58.000]  Well, either we're going to another break that I'm missing out on with a lack of a caller page or something.
[57:58.000 --> 58:00.000]  Yeah, we're going to break now.
[58:00.000 --> 58:01.000]  All right.
[58:01.000 --> 58:07.000]  Folks, this is ruled of law radio. I am your host for Monday night show, Eddie Craig.
[58:07.000 --> 58:15.000]  Generally, this is our traffic night, but hey, we can deal with anything that comes along as long as it deals with law, Constitution, due process and things of that nature.
[58:15.000 --> 58:21.000]  Call in number when we get back 512-646-1984.
[58:21.000 --> 58:49.000]  Just hang in there, folks. We got more to go. We'll be right back after this break.
[58:49.000 --> 58:57.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.000 --> 59:06.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.000 --> 59:08.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.000 --> 59:17.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.000 --> 59:27.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.000 --> 59:32.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:32.000 --> 59:43.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.000 --> 59:50.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.000 --> 59:56.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:01.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  We all know the FBI likes getting citizens to inform on their friends, but did you know Facebook is now up to the same dirty tricks?
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:15.000]  I'm Dr. Kaffir Albrecht, and I'll tell you how Facebook is turning users into snitches that rat each other out next.
[01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:17.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:17.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:26.000 --> 01:00:31.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:31.000 --> 01:00:34.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:34.000 --> 01:00:41.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:44.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  In an age where every crumb of personal data is prized by snoopy governments and shady marketers, pseudonyms are shields of freedom.
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:58.000]  Fake names help us connect on the web without having to trade our most precious asset, privacy.
[01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:04.000]  But now Facebook is asking users to snitch on friends who use aliases, and it's got me hopping mad.
[01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  By showing people's accounts to their Facebook friends and asking what that person's real name is, Facebook is assaulting a basic freedom.
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  To call ourselves whatever we choose, accept a course on official documents.
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:23.000]  Facebook is not your friend, it's a snoop. Don't let it breach your trust with your real friends.
[01:01:23.000 --> 01:01:28.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:36.000]  Is too much internet driving Americans crazy?
[01:01:36.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  New research says the web can make us lonely and depressed and even psychotic.
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:47.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll talk about the internet's impact on our state of mind in a moment.
[01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:18.000]  It's no secret many Americans spend more time tweeting, texting and emailing than they do sleeping.
[01:02:18.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  But can too much time online make us plum crazy?
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:30.000]  Proof is piling up that the internet may be making us lonelier, more depressed, prone to obsessive compulsive disorders and in extreme cases even psychotic.
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:36.000]  Researchers are documenting actual changes in the brain caused by even moderate web exposure.
[01:02:36.000 --> 01:02:41.000]  They're finding that digitized minds are constantly scanning for a fix just like drug addicts,
[01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:46.000]  with every ping delivering a squirt of dopamine, that many reward system for opening that message.
[01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  Maybe it's time we stopped answering the call.
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:03:07.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:03:20.000 --> 01:03:25.000]  These warm-unders come by that term rightly.
[01:03:29.000 --> 01:03:32.000]  I won't pay for the war with my body.
[01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:35.000]  I ain't gonna pay for the car with my money.
[01:03:35.000 --> 01:03:39.000]  I won't pay for the fun with my body.
[01:03:39.000 --> 01:03:42.000]  This man's wicked and their logic shoddy.
[01:03:42.000 --> 01:03:45.000]  I ain't gonna pay for the war with my body.
[01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:49.000]  I won't pay for the boys with my money.
[01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:53.000]  I ain't gonna pay for the kids with my body.
[01:03:53.000 --> 01:03:56.000]  The whole agenda smells funny.
[01:03:56.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  I wanna fight in a wire of my own.
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:07.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:13.000]  Alright, I now have a functioning computer with internet access again after that break reboot.
[01:04:13.000 --> 01:04:16.000]  So we have a couple of callers up on the board at the moment.
[01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:18.000]  We're gonna go to Hannibal in New York.
[01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  Hannibal, let's hope your last name's not Lecter in New York. What can we do for you?
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:28.000]  Hey, what's up Eddie? It's Cholo. You have me as a friend.
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:30.000]  Okay, yeah. I got you. What's up?
[01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:32.000]  Yeah.
[01:04:32.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  My question was in the civil trial.
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:47.000]  And if I ask the defendants or the officers which I'm suing, two questions.
[01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:53.000]  Did you file a valid cause of action against me and what are the elements?
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:57.000]  And will that impeach the witnesses?
[01:04:57.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  You're saying this is a civil case?
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:01.000]  Yes.
[01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  They filed a civil complaint?
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:07.000]  No, I filed a civil complaint against NYPD.
[01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:12.000]  As you know, because you guys, I had help getting my cases dismissed.
[01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:15.000]  Okay, you're suing NYPD?
[01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  Well, I'm at NYPD, New York City, and two officers from NYPD.
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  Okay.
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:23.000]  It's in federal court.
[01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:24.000]  Okay.
[01:05:24.000 --> 01:05:34.000]  And just about done with the discovery phase, and we're going to go through the motions, motions hearings, and I don't know when the court date will be set up.
[01:05:34.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  But I was wondering, because you could impeach the witness in a criminal case, because if you ask those two questions, you know, did you file a valid cause of action and what were the elements for those cause of action?
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:59.000]  You know, the attorney will get up and say the witness does not have knowledge or whatever down to the question.
[01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  Okay.
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:06.000]  I'm not quite sure how that's going to play out.
[01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:11.000]  The officer, I'm assuming you're talking about having the officer understand and asking that question?
[01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:12.000]  Yes.
[01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:18.000]  Okay, the officer is not the one that acted with the prosecutorial power of the state, is he?
[01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:21.000]  Did the officer act as the prosecutor in your case?
[01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:22.000]  No.
[01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:25.000]  Okay, then the officer never filed a cause of action.
[01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:32.000]  The officer simply filed a complaint of some kind, and some attorney did the cause of action.
[01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  Where is he or she?
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  Actually, I put the attorney down as one of the plaintiffs, and the judge...
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:44.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:46.000]  You're the plaintiff.
[01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  I mean, the judge said that he had prosecutorial immunity.
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  Yes.
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:07:04.000]  Okay, but not if he was acting absent immunity, he doesn't, or she doesn't.
[01:07:04.000 --> 01:07:10.000]  Did you raise the issue that the prosecutor was acting maliciously and without jurisdiction?
[01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:12.000]  No, I did not.
[01:07:12.000 --> 01:07:13.000]  Okay.
[01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:17.000]  See, this is where we go after them for the malicious prosecution aspect.
[01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:26.000]  They do not have immunity for malicious prosecution, and you have a cause of action for malicious prosecution in two cases.
[01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:31.000]  One, you beat the rap, and it's criminal.
[01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  Two, they drop the case after Jeopardy has attached, as in they have filed an indictment or charging instrument.
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:51.000]  Thus, Jeopardy has attached, or you've made an appearance in court for the purpose of defending yourself.
[01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  Jeopardy has attached.
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:08:00.000]  Okay, if they dismiss after Jeopardy attaches, it's still malicious prosecution.
[01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:07.000]  So, did you state a cause of action in your suit for malicious prosecution?
[01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:09.000]  No, I did not.
[01:08:09.000 --> 01:08:15.000]  That's why you can't touch the attorney or the judge.
[01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:25.000]  Had you done that, then you could bring both of them in.
[01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:29.000]  All right, very interesting.
[01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:42.000]  Yeah, that's all I wanted to know, because if I could use that as leverage in the case, but you do make a valid point that the officers were not.
[01:08:42.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  But didn't they start the cause of action by filing the complaint?
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:55.000]  No, you can't sue somebody for lodging a complaint.
[01:08:55.000 --> 01:09:03.000]  Unless you can show that the complaint itself was intentionally false and malicious and done for the purpose of harassment.
[01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:09.000]  Yeah, I can definitely sue that because they had no facts whatsoever to back up what they were claiming.
[01:09:09.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  Well, in a criminal case, no one has to have facts.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:19.000]  They only have to believe that a crime occurred.
[01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:23.000]  Okay, see, that's the difference between the criminal and the civil.
[01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:27.000]  In the criminal, anybody can lodge the complaint.
[01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:29.000]  They do not have to be a competent fact witness.
[01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:31.000]  They did not have to see the act.
[01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:45.000]  All they have to do is believe a crime has been committed, and you are going to have a hell of a time proving someone didn't believe something.
[01:09:45.000 --> 01:09:54.000]  It would literally take a confession of their own lips to say, no, I never believed it. I just said it to get you in trouble.
[01:09:54.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  Unless you get that on the stand, you will never win that argument.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:20.000]  All right, but they had no probable cause whatsoever. They approached me, asked me for ID, all right, and I went through the script, my under arrest, my being detained.
[01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:25.000]  Well, I didn't say it that way. I said, do you have a warrant? They said no.
[01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:34.000]  I said, did you see me breach the peace? They said no. And then I exercised my right not to be searched.
[01:10:34.000 --> 01:10:45.000]  And they got violent, searched me, didn't find anything, and made up charges on me.
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  So I was trespassing in a building when I wasn't in the building, and the two officers actually drugged me into the building themselves.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:03.000]  But one officer drugged me in, and the other officer, you know, didn't do anything about the one officer who was committing.
[01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:12.000]  Okay, well, tell me what you believe your causes of action are based upon what they did. What should you be claiming as causes of action in federal court?
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:16.000]  False imprisonment.
[01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:19.000]  That is?
[01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:23.000]  They said I could only pick one when I was filing the complaint.
[01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:26.000]  Who said you could only pick one?
[01:11:26.000 --> 01:11:32.000]  That was what the rules were of the court when they said I filed action.
[01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:41.000]  The court cannot limit your causes of action. If you have a valid cause of action, then you claim it.
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:52.000]  If the court is telling you you can't do anything else, then the court is denying you access to the court, which is a violation of itself.
[01:11:52.000 --> 01:11:57.000]  From what you've just described, here's a minimum of what I see.
[01:11:57.000 --> 01:11:59.000]  False imprisonment.
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:02.000]  Deprivation of rights under color of law.
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:04.000]  Illegal search and seizure.
[01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:06.000]  Aggravated assault.
[01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:10.000]  If they removed you from the location, aggravated kidnapping.
[01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:17.000]  All of those add up to the federal level official misconduct as well.
[01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:27.000]  Well, I did alleged that they committed crimes against me on the state level, like what crimes they had committed.
[01:12:27.000 --> 01:12:31.000]  Okay, but you're suing them in federal court.
[01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  You can't sue for violation of state law unless the state law violation resulted in a violation of a federally protected right.
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:44.000]  That's what happened.
[01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:45.000]  Right.
[01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:49.000]  Well, I'm telling you what those violations are.
[01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  The things they did violated specifically fundamental protected rights, specific fundamental protected rights.
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:01.000]  And they used the policy of stopping for it.
[01:13:01.000 --> 01:13:04.000]  Well, there's no such allowable policy.
[01:13:04.000 --> 01:13:10.000]  Yeah, that was one of the points that I brought up when they tried to motion for dismissal.
[01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:15.000]  Hence illegal search and seizure.
[01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:16.000]  Yeah.
[01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  Fourth amendment violation.
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:35.000]  They presented no facts whatsoever, just a bunch of hearsay and opinions, but no facts to back up their motion to dismiss.
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:38.000]  Well, did you rebut their motion to dismiss?
[01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:39.000]  Yes, I did.
[01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:40.000]  I did.
[01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:41.000]  Okay.
[01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  Well, if you successfully rebutted it and your case is still in court, what's the problem?
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:51.000]  Well, I was wondering if I could use, but you cleared it up for me.
[01:13:51.000 --> 01:13:55.000]  Did you file a valid cause of action against me?
[01:13:55.000 --> 01:14:02.000]  And that's also, you know, was it, what are the elements, but were the elements?
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  But you pointed out that they, anybody could file a complaint if they believe a crime has, you know, been committed.
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:12.000]  That's correct.
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:26.000]  You can't sue them for making the complaint, but you can certainly sue them for what they did to you directly that they had no authority to do.
[01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:27.000]  All right.
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:32.000]  Yeah, I'm suing them for what they had no authority to do.
[01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:33.000]  Okay.
[01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:38.000]  Well, it sounds like you're only suing them for one thing and you've got more than one.
[01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:43.000]  Let's say I'm not to amend the complaint.
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:45.000]  Well, thank you, Eddie.
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  It looks like I had to do some work and did I put in motion to amend the complaint and try to get the DA also indicted for part of the case?
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:56.000]  Yeah.
[01:14:56.000 --> 01:15:01.000]  If you can do a malicious prosecution, if you can get that in there, then you're good to go.
[01:15:01.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  All right.
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:03.000]  All right.
[01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:04.000]  Thank you, Eddie.
[01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:05.000]  You're very welcome.
[01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:06.000]  Great help.
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:07.000]  All right.
[01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:08.000]  Have a good night.
[01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  You too.
[01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  All right.
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:12.000]  We've got about two minutes left before break.
[01:15:12.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  We're going to get started with Terry in Texas.
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:16.000]  All right.
[01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  Terry, got about a minute and a half for me to cut you off and go to break.
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:21.000]  What you got?
[01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:24.000]  Well, long time no talk to you, Eddie.
[01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:29.000]  Probably going to be hopefully under an hour and a half, excuse me, under a minute and a half.
[01:15:29.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  This is a little change of, this is sort of a change up for you instead of talking about traffic.
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:38.000]  I want to ask you a question about the TSA.
[01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:44.000]  It seems the last few times I've traveled on the airlines, you get to the point where you're
[01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  getting ready to go into the security part and they want your license.
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:53.000]  And they always want you, they look at your license, they look at you, and they ask you
[01:15:53.000 --> 01:15:55.000]  to pronounce your name.
[01:15:55.000 --> 01:15:57.000]  Now, what is my course of action?
[01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:00.000]  Do I not have to pronounce my name?
[01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:03.000]  Do I ask the guy, can't you read English?
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  You know, how do I approach it?
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  Because it really chaps me that somebody looks at me and it looks at my driver's license
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:13.000]  and then asks me how to pronounce my own name.
[01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:18.000]  Well, do something ridiculous.
[01:16:18.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  I mean, they ask me that I'm going to go C-Rage.
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:31.000]  I mean, do I actually, would I even have to answer that question?
[01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  What law requires you to answer that question?
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:39.000]  It all depends on how much aggravation you're willing to put up with and how much stupidity
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:41.000]  you want to deal with.
[01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:43.000]  Oh, I can imagine a lot.
[01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:45.000]  I might want to get there really early.
[01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  Yeah, you may.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:48.000]  I don't know what your motivation is.
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:49.000]  Hang on, Terry.
[01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio 512-646-934.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:55.000]  Terry's our last caller.
[01:16:55.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  I need some more.
[01:16:56.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:04.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:17:04.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:13.000]  Capital Coin features a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:17.000]  In addition to providing the best prices in the nation, we want to bring you the best
[01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  shopping experience both in-store and online.
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  In addition to coins and bullion, we carry popular young Jeopardy products such as
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:26.000]  Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst.
[01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:31.000]  We offer freeze-dried, storeable foods by Augustin Farms, Verdee Water Products,
[01:17:31.000 --> 01:17:34.000]  ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:38.000]  You can lock in a spot price with our Silver Pool, and we set up Metal's IRA account.
[01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  Call us at 512-646-644-0 for more details.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:52.000]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10-6, Saturdays, 10-2.
[01:17:52.000 --> 01:17:57.000]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-644-0.
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:28.000]  Ain't I a sight compared to what I used to be?
[01:18:28.000 --> 01:18:34.000]  Calcium, magnesium, selenium, and zinc.
[01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  Take a moment now and think if you have a little thing.
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  Every day will bring the life that you've been looking for.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  Beyond Tangy Tangerine is available at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:18:56.000]  The bookstore also carries the works of Dr. Joel Wallach,
[01:18:56.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  founder of Young Jevity, and creator of Beyond Tangy Tangerine.
[01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:23.000]  Music playing
[01:19:23.000 --> 01:19:27.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Wall Radio.
[01:19:27.000 --> 01:19:32.000]  Right now we are talking to Terry in Texas. Alright, Terry, go ahead.
[01:19:32.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  Yeah, I guess the way I want to approach it the next time around it happens is to ask them
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:48.000]  what pronouncing, how my name is pronounced, what or how that has anything to do with my right to travel,
[01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:49.000]  or board the airplane.
[01:19:49.000 --> 01:19:51.000]  Well, I can tell you what they're going to say.
[01:19:51.000 --> 01:19:54.000]  Well, we get lots of people through here using fake IDs.
[01:19:54.000 --> 01:19:58.000]  Same the last two.
[01:19:58.000 --> 01:20:05.000]  It's just another way for them to get you accustomed to answering questions.
[01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:08.000]  And I mean, I'm the kind of guy that looks at me and says,
[01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:11.000]  well, today I'm going with Sea Rage.
[01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:18.000]  Yesterday it was Craig. Tomorrow, who knows?
[01:20:18.000 --> 01:20:25.000]  But if it helps you folks, I've gotten on airplanes without a valid ID.
[01:20:25.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  I've used an old driver's license with a copy of my actual birth certificate.
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:36.000]  And I've gotten on planes and traveled with that.
[01:20:36.000 --> 01:20:39.000]  But that's still not going to be able for you, if they want to pull that,
[01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:42.000]  which I've seen here recently in the last year and a half,
[01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:46.000]  seems every single time I get asked how I pronounce my name.
[01:20:46.000 --> 01:20:50.000]  I've got an old driver's license. I can present that for identification.
[01:20:50.000 --> 01:20:52.000]  But that's not going to be able to circumvent me.
[01:20:52.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  They'll ask me, how do you pronounce this, your name?
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  Well, I want to say, do you not read English?
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:00.000]  Or are you not able to copy English?
[01:21:00.000 --> 01:21:02.000]  You can say whatever you want, okay?
[01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:05.000]  I mean, there's no requirement for you to pronounce it for them.
[01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:11.000]  But again, they're there to indoctrinate you and make an example of you
[01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  when you won't do it the way they want you to feel they have the authority to make you do it.
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:17.000]  Oh, I know.
[01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:21.000]  So how you handle that, that's everybody's preference.
[01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:25.000]  If you want to put up with the aggravation of making them pay for being stupid
[01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  and invading your privacy, that's up to you.
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  So how you respond, as long as it's not like mad bombers how you pronounce it.
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:41.000]  You know, I wouldn't recommend that.
[01:21:41.000 --> 01:21:47.000]  Otherwise, whatever, you know?
[01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:50.000]  Yeah, well, I can see that the way they manipulate the system,
[01:21:50.000 --> 01:21:54.000]  if I do put up a stink about it, then they make me miss my flight.
[01:21:54.000 --> 01:21:55.000]  Yeah.
[01:21:55.000 --> 01:21:57.000]  Well, that's true.
[01:21:57.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  They'll do whatever they think they can get away with.
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:06.000]  But at the same time, why aren't we doing something about them interfering with our right to travel that way?
[01:22:06.000 --> 01:22:09.000]  I mean, you gave them the ID.
[01:22:09.000 --> 01:22:17.000]  Announcing it should not be a requirement to getting through the security checkpoint.
[01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:22.000]  Yeah, I'm going to ask them, is the government ID, is there a problem with the ID?
[01:22:22.000 --> 01:22:24.000]  Yeah, exactly.
[01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:27.000]  So, you know, it's up to you.
[01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  However you want to handle it, whatever you're prepared to deal with.
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:35.000]  I think I'm going to probably step it up a notch this time.
[01:22:35.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  Well, all right.
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:38.000]  I wish y'all luck in the world with it.
[01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:39.000]  All right.
[01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  All right.
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  Hang in there, Terry.
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:42.000]  Bye.
[01:22:42.000 --> 01:22:43.000]  All right.
[01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:46.000]  Now we're going to go to Rick in Texas.
[01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:48.000]  Rick, what can we do for you?
[01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:50.000]  Hello, yes.
[01:22:50.000 --> 01:22:53.000]  I think you guys are doing a great job, and I appreciate it.
[01:22:53.000 --> 01:22:55.000]  Well, thank you.
[01:22:55.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  Okay.
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:23:06.000]  The, it would be, this is about police officer, you know, in uniform, you know, really bad misconduct.
[01:23:06.000 --> 01:23:10.000]  Is there, and what is statute of limitations?
[01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  I don't know the terminology if that's right.
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:17.000]  You know, is there a time limit to file and make complaints and all that?
[01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:21.000]  Well, it depends on what you're proposing on doing.
[01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  If you're proposing on suing, it's two years from the date of the occurrence.
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:29.000]  Okay.
[01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:30.000]  Okay.
[01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:32.000]  I guess that covers that.
[01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:33.000]  Okay.
[01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  Again, I'm not sure of the terminology, bench warrants, whatever it's called, an old traffic ticket.
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:40.000]  It seems like there's no limit on time.
[01:23:40.000 --> 01:23:44.000]  It could be nine years later and somebody gets arrested, you know.
[01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:52.000]  Well, a warrant stops the clock, but that's provided the warrant was properly issued to begin with.
[01:23:52.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  All right.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  So if it was for a Class C file only, the warrant was not properly issued to begin with.
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:11.000]  Now, the problem is, is even with the warrant, they're outside of the statute of limitations to prosecute it.
[01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  Well, what if they go ahead and do, you know, say, eight years later and it was a...
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:17.000]  Well, you need to file a motion to dismiss.
[01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:20.000]  It's outside of the statute of limitations.
[01:24:20.000 --> 01:24:30.000]  The question is, is number one, was there a signed valid complaint that gave jurisdiction to the court to issue the warrant?
[01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:37.000]  If there was never a complaint issued, how can there have been a warrant issued?
[01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:38.000]  I don't know.
[01:24:38.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  It started with a traffic ticket.
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:43.000]  Again, follow the logic here.
[01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:44.000]  Okay.
[01:24:44.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  There cannot be a warrant without a signed affidavit of probable cause asserting that there is a reason to believe the person committed a crime for which they can be arrested.
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  In other words, a criminal complaint.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:02.000]  Okay.
[01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  If they never generated the criminal complaint or they issued the warrant way ahead of the generation of an actual criminal complaint, then the warrant is invalid on its face because there was no legal basis for the warrant.
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:32.000]  Okay. Now, in your opinion, what if they've already been arrested, time in jail, and many hundreds of dollars they got?
[01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:39.000]  Then sued to recover all of it for acting without jurisdiction and outside of lawful authority.
[01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:40.000]  Okay.
[01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  I understand.
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:58.000]  Because the judge has no immunity if they acted without jurisdiction. And if there was no legal issue before the court that gave them signed and sworn probable cause to issue that warrant, then the judge was obviously acting without jurisdiction.
[01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  And they have no immunity for that.
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:05.000]  Okay.
[01:26:05.000 --> 01:26:06.000]  Okay.
[01:26:06.000 --> 01:26:07.000]  Yes.
[01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:08.000]  Thank you very much.
[01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:09.000]  You're very welcome.
[01:26:09.000 --> 01:26:10.000]  Okay.
[01:26:10.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  All right.
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:16.000]  I'm going to guess this is either mono or Minaj.
[01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  I don't know which one it is.
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:18.000]  Which one is it?
[01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:19.000]  It's the second one.
[01:26:19.000 --> 01:26:20.000]  Minaj?
[01:26:20.000 --> 01:26:21.000]  Yes.
[01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  All right.
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:23.000]  What can we do for you?
[01:26:23.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  So I got a question about a citation that I got.
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:28.000]  What kind of citation?
[01:26:28.000 --> 01:26:33.000]  The officer said it was a blue through a red light.
[01:26:33.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  A traffic citation.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:36.000]  Correct.
[01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:41.000]  Okay. Red light. Camera blue through a blue, a red light or officer issued?
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:43.000]  Officer issued.
[01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:45.000]  Okay. Motorcycle or car?
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:46.000]  Car.
[01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  Okay.
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:50.000]  So it was yellow when I went through it?
[01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  Well, of course it was.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:54.000]  Okay.
[01:26:54.000 --> 01:27:03.000]  And I do remember traveling at 45 in a 35.
[01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  Do you ride to a speeding citation too?
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:07.000]  He did, yes.
[01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  Okay.
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  And I was traveling 35 and I saw the yellow light turn and, well, he said I gunned it,
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:17.000]  which I did.
[01:27:17.000 --> 01:27:24.000]  And I got through it and he was more than a half a block, three quarters of a block away.
[01:27:24.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  A head or behind?
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:27.000]  He was behind me.
[01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:28.000]  Okay.
[01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:31.000]  How many cars between you and him?
[01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:37.000]  Uh, I mean, when I went through the light.
[01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  Well, would there be some other time when he would have saw you go through the light?
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  Yeah, there were none that I saw behind me after I'd gone through the intersection.
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:49.000]  So there were no cars between you and him?
[01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:50.000]  Correct.
[01:27:50.000 --> 01:27:51.000]  Okay.
[01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  And how did he ascertain your speed?
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:27:58.000]  He, on a ticket, it said my site.
[01:27:58.000 --> 01:28:05.000]  He's behind you and he can count the stripes on the road to measure your speed?
[01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:06.000]  I don't know.
[01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  I mean, I don't know that.
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  He was way behind me.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:19.000]  And I saw the light turn on about half a block to three quarters of a block at night.
[01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:20.000]  Well, wait, wait.
[01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  Okay.
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:22.000]  Yeah.
[01:28:22.000 --> 01:28:24.000]  This was at night time.
[01:28:24.000 --> 01:28:25.000]  Right.
[01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:30.000]  And he was half far behind you when you allegedly went through this light?
[01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:34.000]  From what I remember, I was a half a block away from the intersection.
[01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  Well, how big is this block?
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:38.000]  Well, I'll give you an idea.
[01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:42.000]  It was exactly at Coal Mile and East 7th Street in Austin.
[01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:43.000]  Okay.
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  First off, I am not Matt Quest.
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:46.000]  I don't know how long that is.
[01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:47.000]  Okay.
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:52.000]  Give me a distance in feet or yards.
[01:28:52.000 --> 01:28:56.000]  I would say 300 yards.
[01:28:56.000 --> 01:29:00.000]  So approximately 900 feet, almost 1,000 feet.
[01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  Right.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:04.000]  That's the entire length of the block?
[01:29:04.000 --> 01:29:09.000]  Or that's the distance between you and the officer?
[01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:12.000]  That's the distance between me and the officer.
[01:29:12.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  Okay.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:22.000]  He saw you at night visibly going away from him at a speed of approximately 45 miles an
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:25.000]  hour that he gauged by sight.
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:27.000]  Exactly.
[01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:32.000]  Good luck making that stick in court.
[01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  On his side or my side?
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  On his.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:36.000]  Yeah.
[01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:37.000]  Yeah.
[01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  So I'm wondering, what are the chances if I take it to court, how can I contest it?
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:42.000]  Okay.
[01:29:42.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  That's a whole other argument, but we'll cover that on the other side.
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  Hang on, Menage.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  We'll be right back, okay?
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  Okay, thanks.
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  All right, folks.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio 512-646-1984.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:54.000]  Give us a call.
[01:29:54.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  Menage is my last caller, and I got about a half an hour left, so we'll be right back.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:01.000]  A noble lie.
[01:30:01.000 --> 01:30:06.000]  Oklahoma City, 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  Based on the damage pattern to the building, but the government seems impossible.
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:14.000]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:17.000]  The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  The people that did the things they did knew dogged on well what they were doing.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  Expose the cover up now at thenoblelie.com.
[01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:35.000]  The Rule of Law Radio Network is proud to present a due process of law seminar hosted
[01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  by our own Eddie Craig.
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:41.000]  He's a former Nacodotius sheriff's deputy, and for the past 21 years, he's been studying
[01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  the due process of law and now offers his knowledge to you at a seminar every Sunday
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  from 2 o'clock to 5 o'clock at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:55.000]  Admission is $20, so please make plans to come by and sit with Eddie and learn for yourself
[01:30:55.000 --> 01:30:59.000]  what the true intent of law really is.
[01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:04.000]  At hempusa.org, we offer chemical-free products to people around the world,
[01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  detoxifying, self-healing while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:13.000]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest-selling product, micro-plant powder.
[01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  Our micro-plant powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc, and silica to help rebuild
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:28.000]  Micro-plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:31:28.000 --> 01:31:32.000]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org.
[01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  And remember, all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:41.000]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality, and rapid shipping anywhere.
[01:31:41.000 --> 01:31:45.000]  And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  That's 908-6912608.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:32:02.000]  See what our powders, seeds, and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:32:02.000 --> 01:32:24.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:32:24.000 --> 01:32:35.000]  Hi, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. I'm going to interrupt the call here.
[01:32:35.000 --> 01:32:39.000]  I meant to mention this at the top of the hour, and then I forgot.
[01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:44.000]  Folks, we are in the middle of a fundraiser right now, and we do need your help.
[01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:47.000]  We've got equipment that needs to be replaced.
[01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:53.000]  We've had to borrow money to pay for operating expenses for the last few months that we need to pay back.
[01:32:53.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  We need more money to continue to do what we're doing.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:07.000]  And so I have a fundraiser push right now to purchase new equipment and to get a little booty together here,
[01:33:07.000 --> 01:33:12.000]  a little till, so that we can pay for these ongoing operating expenses that keep going up,
[01:33:12.000 --> 01:33:16.000]  the power company keeps raising the rates, all these kinds of things.
[01:33:16.000 --> 01:33:22.000]  So, folks, if you would go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, you'll see the chip-in button on the upper left.
[01:33:22.000 --> 01:33:26.000]  If you want to write us a check, then you can send me an email.
[01:33:26.000 --> 01:33:31.000]  That's debora-d-e-b-o-r-a-h at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:36.000]  Otherwise, you can just click on the chip-in to go through either PayPal or a credit card.
[01:33:36.000 --> 01:33:45.000]  And right now, we have a special offer for the next seven people that donate at least $50 or more.
[01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:52.000]  A listener has donated some gift cards for Purium Health Supplement products.
[01:33:52.000 --> 01:33:59.000]  So, for the next seven people, it was 10 on Friday, and three of them have been taken already
[01:33:59.000 --> 01:34:03.000]  with people that have participated in this program.
[01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:08.000]  But for the next seven people, if you donate $50 or more to the network fundraiser,
[01:34:08.000 --> 01:34:15.000]  you will get a $50 gift card for Purium Health Supplement products.
[01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:18.000]  And more information on that is on LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:22.000]  You can click on the links, find out more about Purium Health Supplements.
[01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  And I think this is a very generous offer of our listeners to do this, to donate these gift cards like this.
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  And folks, hey, it's great.
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:33.000]  It's a one-for-one.
[01:34:33.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  You're not losing anything.
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:41.000]  You donate to the network, it supports the network, and you get $50 worth of Purium Health products.
[01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:45.000]  In return, you can give the gift card as a gift for Christmas.
[01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:51.000]  If you're looking for something to give to others, you will be able to get your Christmas shopping done
[01:34:51.000 --> 01:34:55.000]  and donate to the network at the same time, all in one failed swoop.
[01:34:55.000 --> 01:35:01.000]  So, folks, again, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for more information on those gift cards.
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:02.000]  All right, thanks, Eddie.
[01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  Yeah, no problem.
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:10.000]  All right, now we're going to go ahead and go back to Manaj and finish up his call.
[01:35:10.000 --> 01:35:12.000]  Okay.
[01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:16.000]  First off, were you engaging in transportation?
[01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:17.000]  What were you in?
[01:35:17.000 --> 01:35:19.000]  I was in my car.
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:20.000]  You were in your car.
[01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:21.000]  And what were you doing?
[01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:23.000]  I was driving.
[01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:26.000]  You're dead in the water already.
[01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  Okay.
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:32.000]  You were what?
[01:35:32.000 --> 01:35:33.000]  I was traveling.
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  There you go.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:41.000]  East on East 7th Street.
[01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  Okay.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:51.000]  And so, what do we do in court?
[01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:54.000]  What do we do in court?
[01:35:54.000 --> 01:35:55.000]  Is it?
[01:35:55.000 --> 01:35:56.000]  Yeah, you got a ticket.
[01:35:56.000 --> 01:35:58.000]  Now, what do we do?
[01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:04.000]  I go to court and appear in court and say, either I'm going to contest it,
[01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:08.000]  or what is it, no low contender-y?
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  You ain't been to any of the classes, Eddie.
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:14.000]  No, I just listened to the radio show.
[01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  Well, I guess what?
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:17.000]  That ain't going to get you in court.
[01:36:17.000 --> 01:36:19.000]  All right.
[01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:20.000]  You need to come to the classes.
[01:36:20.000 --> 01:36:24.000]  You're going to fight this in court because what you just said ain't going to get you anywhere,
[01:36:24.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  but broke.
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  Hmm.
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:35.000]  There are proper documents to file and proper things to say and do.
[01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  And judging by what you're saying right now, you don't know what those are,
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:43.000]  and you need to come find out.
[01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  Let's see.
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:47.000]  Judging by the phone number, you are in the general area of Austin,
[01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:49.000]  so that shouldn't be too hard.
[01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:53.000]  Sundays from 2 to 5, down at Brave New Books.
[01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:57.000]  Yeah, I've heard of the classes that you hold.
[01:36:57.000 --> 01:37:01.000]  Yeah, and there's a reason we hold them.
[01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  And you are now a first-hand participant in the reason.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:12.000]  Hmm.
[01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:18.000]  But you'd be happy to know that my win rate is extremely high.
[01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:22.000]  Okay.
[01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:28.000]  So if I was there on Sunday, would I get all my questions answered there?
[01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:31.000]  Depends on what those questions are.
[01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:33.000]  Here's what you need to know.
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:37.000]  You need to know what's in the traffic seminar material if you have it,
[01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:42.000]  because all the court documents and everything that you need to fight are there.
[01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  Already pre-written, all you have to do is a little bit of editing to make it match up to your information and scenario and filing.
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:51.000]  Okay?
[01:37:51.000 --> 01:37:57.000]  And then you have to learn how to go to court and do things.
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:03.000]  And that's what we do in the classes every Sunday is teach you procedure.
[01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:06.000]  Okay, we teach you how to make argument, we teach you how to object,
[01:38:06.000 --> 01:38:12.000]  we teach you how to ask questions, and so on and so forth.
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  Hmm.
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:23.000]  Because I was thinking it's either defensive driving and going through that mess or court,
[01:38:23.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  because I believe this officer was wrong.
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:31.000]  He did not do it at night by using sight, ma'am.
[01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:33.000]  I don't think that's right.
[01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  Not from a thousand feet away.
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:35.000]  There's no way.
[01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:37.000]  Right.
[01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:38.000]  How was he able to gauge that?
[01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  He even got the ticket.
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:42.000]  Okay, but wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:43.000]  All right.
[01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  What's the problem with even bringing that up?
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:51.000]  I question his judgment in thousand feet.
[01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  No, no, no.
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:54.000]  Okay.
[01:38:54.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  What is the problem that you have by even bringing that up?
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:08.000]  I think it's inaccurate for one thing.
[01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:10.000]  Okay.
[01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:14.000]  What you're doing is addressing merits.
[01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:18.000]  We do not address merits in these cases.
[01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:22.000]  You want to know why?
[01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:24.000]  Yes, I do.
[01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:33.000]  Because merits are only applicable to those people that are subject to those regulations.
[01:39:33.000 --> 01:39:43.000]  If you are not an operator or a driver of a motor vehicle, then those regulations do not apply to you.
[01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:48.000]  Therefore, the merits do not apply to you.
[01:39:48.000 --> 01:39:55.000]  You cannot be subjected to a law that has no power over what you're doing.
[01:39:55.000 --> 01:40:06.000]  If a law says it applies only to blue cars, then it cannot be used against anyone in a white car.
[01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:07.000]  See the concept here?
[01:40:07.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  Yeah.
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  So the person in the white car doesn't go and argue the merits.
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:20.000]  The person in the white car says that rule can't be applied to me.
[01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  My car is white, not blue.
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:27.000]  Well, that's our argument.
[01:40:27.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  My car is not a motor vehicle.
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:34.000]  I am not a driver or an operator.
[01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:37.000]  Those rules don't apply to me.
[01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:46.000]  I'm not acting in those capacities for that purpose of transportation that would make me subject to those rules.
[01:40:46.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  That is why we don't go to merits.
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:56.000]  If you argue merits, you accept being saddled with the capacity.
[01:40:56.000 --> 01:41:09.000]  You put yourself in the place you never wanted to be to begin with.
[01:41:09.000 --> 01:41:10.000]  All right.
[01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  Two to five on Sundays now.
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  Yep.
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:13.000]  Every Sunday.
[01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:24.000]  Except for major holidays, which this year, I can pretty much guarantee you that any weekend that is immediately at or just prior to Christmas Eve,
[01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:29.000]  through any weekend immediately on or after New Year's Eve, there will be no class.
[01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  Otherwise, there will be.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  Why is there any court date to be changed?
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:41.000]  Well, that's called filing a motion for continuance.
[01:41:41.000 --> 01:41:47.000]  But when you say your court date, you're talking about the date on the citation that you have to appear, right?
[01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:48.000]  Correct.
[01:41:48.000 --> 01:41:49.000]  Okay.
[01:41:49.000 --> 01:41:50.000]  You don't go to court.
[01:41:50.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  You just go down and file documents with the clerk.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:57.000]  And again, those are documents that are in the seminar material.
[01:41:57.000 --> 01:42:01.000]  And if you don't have it, then I highly recommend you get it.
[01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:07.000]  But if you want to know what you're fighting and why, that's the first place you need to go.
[01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:10.000]  So you're going to be there?
[01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:12.000]  In court or at class?
[01:42:12.000 --> 01:42:13.000]  In class.
[01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  Class to sort of be pointless without me, don't you think?
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:17.000]  I think so.
[01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:20.000]  I just want to make sure that you're there.
[01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:21.000]  Yeah.
[01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:23.000]  If there's a class, I'm there.
[01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  All right.
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:27.000]  Looks like I need to do some more work.
[01:42:27.000 --> 01:42:28.000]  Yep.
[01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:29.000]  That would be a good start.
[01:42:29.000 --> 01:42:33.000]  But hopefully we'll see you down there and get you going in the right direction for it.
[01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:34.000]  I appreciate it.
[01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:35.000]  Thank you.
[01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:36.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:37.000]  Thank you for calling in.
[01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:38.000]  My pleasure.
[01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:39.000]  Thanks.
[01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:40.000]  All right.
[01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  Menaz was our last caller, folks.
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:44.000]  And we got 15 minutes left in this show.
[01:42:44.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  Are you sure you want to be listening to me for the rest of this time?
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:49.000]  I'm up for it, but are you?
[01:42:49.000 --> 01:43:02.000]  In the meantime, however, I guess we can sit here and discuss some more about what these people aren't doing correctly, which is pretty much everything.
[01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:04.000]  How did we get to this point?
[01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:15.000]  Well, we got to this point because we, the people, stopped wanting to have to participate in our own governmental function.
[01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:21.000]  We have become a nation of let somebody else do it.
[01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  We are the epitome of lazy.
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  We are the epitome of I don't care enough to do it myself.
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:31.000]  Okay.
[01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:33.000]  We need to stop that attitude.
[01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  We need to stop it yesterday.
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:36.000]  Okay.
[01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  Or we're the ones that's going to be knocked out of the stupid tree and drugged through the whole dumb-ass forest, hitting every tree on the way out.
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:47.000]  And we got too many of those living at Walmart as it is.
[01:43:47.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  All right, folks.
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  This is Rural Law Radio 512-646-1984.
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:59.000]  We will be right back on the other side of this frame.
[01:43:59.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:11.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  Brave New Books?
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Yes.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:23.000]  They even stock inner food, Burkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:44:23.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:31.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:35.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:44:35.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:46.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:59.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m., and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays. So give them a call at 512-480-2503, or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.000 --> 01:46:22.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.000 --> 01:46:30.000]  Alright, folks, we are back. We have zero callers, so I guess this last quarter hour is all mine for the time being.
[01:46:30.000 --> 01:46:35.000]  Okay, now, how do we solve this problem?
[01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:43.000]  Well, there is no one specific way to solve it, but let me make a suggestion or two.
[01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:55.000]  In case you haven't been paying attention lately, I am currently not doing the Thursday and Friday shows because I am working on the project of launching a new website,
[01:46:55.000 --> 01:47:17.000]  Dow of Law, T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W. When we get that site up and going, it is going to be, in my hopes and dreams, the absolute foremost cutting-edge, technologically advanced,
[01:47:17.000 --> 01:47:27.000]  patriot unification organization and directive website on the entire planet.
[01:47:27.000 --> 01:47:40.000]  For a very small membership fee, you will have access to so many useful patriot community tools, it won't even be funny.
[01:47:40.000 --> 01:47:49.000]  We will have an interactive calendaring system on this site where people can schedule events, they can schedule court cases,
[01:47:49.000 --> 01:48:00.000]  they can get people to sign up to be court watchers, witnesses, to attend events, I mean, just pretty much anything and everything.
[01:48:00.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  It will be a community clearinghouse of patriot events and things that are going on.
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:12.000]  We will have the ability to conduct audio, video, online classes.
[01:48:12.000 --> 01:48:23.000]  We will have our own distance learning software that will be hosted and run directly through the site, customized to our needs and specifications.
[01:48:23.000 --> 01:48:33.000]  Any member will be able to set up and create an online meeting or an online class complete with audio and video with any other member of the site.
[01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:42.000]  You'll be able, that will facilitate you to hold group meetings without having to physically go out to any particular location.
[01:48:42.000 --> 01:48:53.000]  It will facilitate you to get together with the people that have signed up to be court watchers or witnesses or to help you strategize on your legal defense and your court arguments.
[01:48:53.000 --> 01:49:00.000]  Basically, it will facilitate our ability to work together in the most efficient manner possible.
[01:49:00.000 --> 01:49:08.000]  And people from all over the world will be able to be in your meeting if they wish to do so.
[01:49:08.000 --> 01:49:13.000]  It will allow you to set up scheduled events that will send out notifications.
[01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  It will allow you to set up your meetings as a scheduled event.
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  You'll be able to set it up. People will get email and message notifications that the scheduled event is coming up in X amount of days, X amount of hours, and so on and so forth.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  And then one of the other features that we're looking at in phase two, and this is just to scratch in the surface here on phase one, folks.
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:46.000]  Those are the two primary things we want to absolutely make sure we have on the first launch.
[01:49:46.000 --> 01:50:00.000]  But second launch phase, we're going to go into having an application that we're going to have ready beginning probably with Android phones called, you know, we don't really know what we're going to call it yet.
[01:50:00.000 --> 01:50:13.000]  But basically it's going to be a panic button app where if you happen to be out on like a peaceful streets project or a cop watch project or you're sitting in a courtroom monitoring a case or anything of that nature,
[01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:22.000]  you can activate this application and this application will start a live audio video stream from your phone.
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:37.000]  It will record it to our server automatically. It will allow you to set up notification lists of people that or groups or the general public that are signed up on our site to receive them.
[01:50:37.000 --> 01:50:46.000]  You can actually activate the app and they will get instant, virtually instant, notification of the activation.
[01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:55.000]  And they will be able to respond back to the activator by a simple button push, responding to scene, for instance.
[01:50:55.000 --> 01:51:12.000]  So they'll just click on the button that says responding. And it will, if they click respond, it will immediately pop up on their phone with your specific GPS Google Maps location and the shortest route to get to you from where they currently are.
[01:51:12.000 --> 01:51:26.000]  It will allow people to say not able to respond. It will say monitoring stream. They can basically just push a button and they can watch the live video feed right there on their phone as well as a copy being recorded on the server.
[01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:41.000]  These are the types of things we're wanting to implement. This will allow us to make that instant notification that we need in the Patriot community for all of these activities that involve our public servants committing crimes right there on the spot.
[01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:50.000]  For us to monitor and do something as an organization about it, it will allow us to unify.
[01:51:50.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  Now, the other benefit of these online meeting capabilities and things like that is it allows more people to attend things like the Sunday classes because the Sunday classes will become a part of Dial of Law and we will record and archive those classes on the server through the distance learning software.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:29.000]  You will have that same feature for your own meeting. Anything that is not one of our sanctioned online classes like your personal meetings with your groups will automatically be recorded for you and you will be given the download link and everyone in your meeting will have access to that download link
[01:52:29.000 --> 01:52:50.000]  for a set number of hours and then after that time has expired, that recording will be deleted from our server. That allows us to conserve our server space but at the same time allows you to archive your meetings so that your group can go back and review them at their leisure.
[01:52:50.000 --> 01:53:03.000]  Okay. And all of this folks will be in that very nominal membership to help us pay the expenses of making these tools available to everyone.
[01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:21.000]  There's nothing on the web like it. Absolutely nothing and this is something the Patriot community sorting needs, a way to get unified and going in the same direction. Like I said, we have far too many groups fighting far too many individual issues.
[01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:34.000]  It's like fighting the symptoms of a disease. You don't cure the disease by fighting the symptoms. You go to the source, the cause and you get rid of it there.
[01:53:34.000 --> 01:53:48.000]  Well folks, the cause of all these issues are our legislators, are our public servants that neither know nor respect the limits of their power and authority as we the people set it up.
[01:53:48.000 --> 01:54:03.000]  We need to start going after these people directly where they live as far as serving us in public office. Get rid of one person that creates 10 bad things and we solve those 10 bad things.
[01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:16.000]  Okay. Because we can go back and pressure the rest of our representatives to stop doing this. It's time we started working in one direction as a Patriot community, not a bunch of Patriot groups.
[01:54:16.000 --> 01:54:24.000]  All right. We got a caller up on the board, Paul, in Texas. Paul, what can we do for you? Good evening, Eddie. Good to hear you again.
[01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:38.000]  I don't know if this is in your purview, but rumor has it that we have like a 34 days to contest President-elect, a stress-elect legitimacy to hold office.
[01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:42.000]  Is that true? Do you know anything about it? And it falls under the 20th Amendment.
[01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:54.000]  Okay. Say that one more time now. Okay. There's a short period of time when a person is elected president. He's elected. He hasn't taken the oath of office yet.
[01:54:54.000 --> 01:55:14.000]  Until January, what, 10th or something? We've got like 34 days left, 33, 34 days that people can contest in court his legitimacy, his legal authority to hold that office.
[01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:21.000]  And it's under the 20th Amendment. If you don't know anything about it, I'd like you to research it and get back with us.
[01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:31.000]  But if that's true, all of the cases have been dismissed because he was already president and the law does not allow that to happen while he's president.
[01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  But while he is elected, that time between he's, tell you, sworn in, we have a chance to file motions and possibly force him out of office.
[01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:55.000]  To show where he has to show his legitimacy, maybe his birth certificate and other things that could...
[01:55:55.000 --> 01:56:02.000]  Okay. Well, hang on a second, Paul. I'm only going to interrupt you here and I'm only going to interrupt you for good reason, but don't think I'm trying to put down what you're saying here.
[01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:09.000]  But there's something you need to understand about the argument. The arguments are relevant.
[01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:19.000]  The question first and foremost is, you're asking about what authority is he acting, and you're presuming that authority is to be found in the federal constitution.
[01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:28.000]  But I'm going to tell you something you don't want to hear, and that is that there is no federal constitution.
[01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:33.000]  How do we know this? Again, something we've gone over in class many times.
[01:56:33.000 --> 01:56:38.000]  Each time we get a new large group of individuals in there, it's one of the things we cover.
[01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:45.000]  Go read the section on natural born citizen as president of the United States.
[01:56:45.000 --> 01:56:53.000]  You will find that both of the criteria are basically modified by the third criteria.
[01:56:53.000 --> 01:57:12.000]  The first two sections, no one except a natural born citizen, comma, or a citizen of the United States, comma, at the time of the adoption of this constitution, comma.
[01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:18.000]  Both of those two first sections are modified by the third.
[01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  No one except a natural born citizen, comma, at the time of the adoption of this constitution.
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:32.000]  No one except the citizen of the United States, comma, at the time of the adoption of this constitution.
[01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:37.000]  When was the constitution adopted, Paul?
[01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:49.000]  Uh, 1776. So the last person that died that was living when that occurred, no one else is eligible to be president.
[01:57:49.000 --> 01:57:52.000]  Oh, God to do so.
[01:57:52.000 --> 01:58:03.000]  And if no one is eligible to be president under the constitution, then one of the necessary cogs of the watch is missing and the watch can't function.
[01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  Therefore, the watch can't exist.
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  See the problem?
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:16.000]  Uh, yeah, it's through my mind in there for me, but I'll work it out.
[01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:22.000]  Take a look at it to see if you think I'm wrong, but so far I don't think anybody's been able to show me where I am.
[01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:24.000]  But thanks for calling in, Paul.
[01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  Hang in there and let's get with it, folks.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:35.000]  All right, this has been Rule of Law Radio, the Monday Night Traffic Show, and where we deal with so much more than traffic on some nights like tonight.
[01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:37.000]  I am your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:40.000]  Thank you so much for listening and for being here and calling in.
[01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Good night and God bless, folks, because we need him and we need him badly.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:29.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.000 --> 01:59:32.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:40.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.