ROL_2012-10-08_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  Fires, earthquakes, yikes! Our homes are subject to lots of threats, but the number one cause
[00:08.000 --> 00:13.000]  of catastrophic water damage is something you can easily prevent. I've got your Catherine Albrecht
[00:13.000 --> 00:16.000]  back with a quick tip to keep your house dry next.
[00:16.000 --> 00:22.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:27.000 --> 00:32.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:38.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com
[00:38.000 --> 00:45.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[00:45.000 --> 00:49.000]  When was the last time you replaced the hose on your washing machine?
[00:49.000 --> 00:51.000]  I bet you never have, and that's not smart.
[00:51.000 --> 00:56.000]  Burst washing machine hoses are the number one cause of catastrophic water damage.
[00:56.000 --> 01:01.000]  See, every time a washing machine cycle ends, it sends a shock wave through the pipes.
[01:01.000 --> 01:06.000]  After years of this water hammer, the rubber gives out and the hose can burst.
[01:06.000 --> 01:11.000]  And when those hoses go, they really gush. It's like a garden hose in your laundry room.
[01:11.000 --> 01:14.000]  Not what you want to come home to after a long day at work.
[01:14.000 --> 01:20.000]  So a good rule of thumb is to replace them every five years or use stainless steel flexible piping.
[01:20.000 --> 01:23.000]  Otherwise your house could be hosed.
[01:23.000 --> 01:28.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:34.000 --> 01:41.000]  Here's a get rich quick scheme for you. What would you do if your ATM machine wouldn't stop spitting out cash?
[01:41.000 --> 01:48.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you what one guy did with 1.5 million from a generous ATM in a moment.
[01:48.000 --> 01:54.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:54.000 --> 01:59.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:59.000 --> 02:04.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:04.000 --> 02:10.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[02:10.000 --> 02:14.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[02:14.000 --> 02:17.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:17.000 --> 02:20.000]  Ronald Page must have thought he'd hit the lotto.
[02:20.000 --> 02:25.000]  A Bank of America teller accidentally changed his account to allow unlimited cash withdrawals,
[02:25.000 --> 02:28.000]  even though he only had 300 bucks in his account.
[02:28.000 --> 02:34.000]  For six whole months, Page cashed in, withdrawing 1.5 million dollars in all.
[02:34.000 --> 02:39.000]  Did he pack the cash in a suitcase and make for Switzerland or invested in change's name?
[02:39.000 --> 02:45.000]  Nope. By the time the bank caught on, Page had gambled it all away at three Detroit casinos.
[02:45.000 --> 02:50.000]  Today, he's serving a 15-month prison sentence and has to pay back every cent.
[02:50.000 --> 02:52.000]  I guess he should have known when to fold.
[02:52.000 --> 03:18.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[03:18.000 --> 03:24.000]  Really, man, come on. Six o'clock noon, say somebody been shot.
[03:24.000 --> 03:28.000]  Somebody's been abused. Somebody blew up a building.
[03:28.000 --> 03:32.000]  Somebody stole a car. Somebody got away.
[03:32.000 --> 03:40.000]  Somebody didn't get too far. Yeah, they didn't get too far.
[03:40.000 --> 03:48.000]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day's time when a man had to answer for the week that he'd done.
[03:48.000 --> 03:52.000]  Take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree.
[03:52.000 --> 04:02.000]  Round up all of them bad boys in the highest street for all the people to see.
[04:02.000 --> 04:06.000]  That's just a simple one thing you should always find.
[04:06.000 --> 04:13.000]  You gotta settle up, you boys. You gotta draw a hard line.
[04:13.000 --> 04:20.000]  All right, folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Traffic Show, and I am your host, Eddie Craig, with you.
[04:20.000 --> 04:25.000]  All right, folks, I'm gonna try to keep the beginning of tonight short and sweet.
[04:25.000 --> 04:30.000]  We are gonna have the phones on. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[04:30.000 --> 04:36.000]  It is October 8th, 2012.
[04:36.000 --> 04:42.000]  It was a pretty uneventful day, but it does have some good sides and some downsides.
[04:42.000 --> 04:47.000]  But right now there's some material that I wanted to give. It's very short.
[04:47.000 --> 04:56.000]  But tonight I want to go over a little bit of the speedy trial issue that we seem to be suffering from in these lower courts at the moment.
[04:56.000 --> 05:01.000]  And while I was researching this this past week at the State Law Library,
[05:01.000 --> 05:13.000]  I happened to be presented by the librarian down there with a copy out of one of the law magazines of an actual speedy trial dismissal motion
[05:13.000 --> 05:21.000]  written by an attorney, Andrew J. Forsythe, out of Williamson Forsythe here in Austin.
[05:21.000 --> 05:28.000]  This was actually published and was right in the back of the magazine, and it's motion to dismiss for failure to provide a speedy trial.
[05:28.000 --> 05:33.000]  And this is pretty much how it reads. Of course, it has the basic case style at the top of it.
[05:33.000 --> 05:42.000]  Then it says, to the honorable judge of said court, comes now defendant in the above entitled and numbered cause and moves the court to dismiss the information
[05:42.000 --> 05:49.000]  slash indictment filed herein. And in support of such a motion would show the court as follows.
[05:49.000 --> 05:55.000]  Now notice right off the bat that it says to dismiss the information slash indictment.
[05:55.000 --> 06:00.000]  Doesn't say beans about dismissing the complaint.
[06:00.000 --> 06:10.000]  Which once again, even in 2010, here is an attorney that knows a complaint does not vest the court with jurisdiction of the cause.
[06:10.000 --> 06:19.000]  Because they never asked for the dismissal of the complaint, they asked for the dismissal of the charging instrument that vests the court with jurisdiction.
[06:19.000 --> 06:26.000]  Now since this is a speedy trial motion, this goes directly to the court's jurisdiction.
[06:26.000 --> 06:28.000]  So keep that little footnote in mind.
[06:28.000 --> 06:40.000]  Paragraph one, the length of the delay in this case, the causes of that delay, the extent of the defendant's assertion of the right to a speedy trial in this cause,
[06:40.000 --> 06:51.000]  and the prejudice to the defendant resulting from the delay have worked to deprive the defendant of his right to a speedy trial as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution
[06:51.000 --> 06:59.000]  and Article 1, Section 10 of the Texas Constitution and Article 1.05 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
[06:59.000 --> 07:07.000]  Paragraph two, the length of the delay in this cause beginning from the date of the alleged offense, the causes of that delay,
[07:07.000 --> 07:17.000]  and the actual prejudice to the defendant resulting from the delay have violated the defendant's right to due process of law as guaranteed by the Fifth
[07:17.000 --> 07:29.000]  and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution as well as defendant's right to due course of law as guaranteed by Article 1, Section 19 of the Texas Constitution
[07:29.000 --> 07:33.000]  and Article 1.04 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
[07:33.000 --> 07:50.000]  Wherefore, premises considered, pursuant to the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article 1, Sections 10 and 19 of the Texas Constitution and Articles 1.04 and 1.05 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,
[07:50.000 --> 07:57.000]  the defendant respectfully requested dismissal of the information slash indictment filed herein.
[07:57.000 --> 08:01.000]  And then, of course, it's got the signature block and all that for the attorney.
[08:01.000 --> 08:07.000]  Now, that's the full extent of this motion to dismiss for failure to provide a speedy trial.
[08:07.000 --> 08:18.000]  What I wanted to go over real quick here, though, was the articles of both the constitutions and the Code of Criminal Procedure that are used in this motion.
[08:18.000 --> 08:21.000]  Now, what problems are we going to face with this motion?
[08:21.000 --> 08:33.000]  First and foremost, you go into one of these lower courts and you start talking about the Constitution, whether it be state or federal, and the first words out of the judge's mouth is, the Constitution does not apply in this court.
[08:33.000 --> 08:41.000]  Yet here we have an attorney specifically writing a motion addressing constitutional issues.
[08:41.000 --> 08:44.000]  What's the reason for the disparity here, folks?
[08:44.000 --> 08:46.000]  That should be your first question.
[08:46.000 --> 08:57.000]  Why does the judge say the Constitution doesn't apply, but here we have a licensed, bar-numbered attorney saying that it does?
[08:57.000 --> 08:59.000]  Well, let me clue you in.
[08:59.000 --> 09:06.000]  The reason is because this attorney's motion is filed in county courts and above.
[09:06.000 --> 09:11.000]  It's not filed in justice and municipal courts, and let me tell you why.
[09:11.000 --> 09:20.000]  They're not actual judicial courts when they're dealing with fine-only offenses such as traffic.
[09:20.000 --> 09:24.000]  They are administrative courts.
[09:24.000 --> 09:36.000]  And the Constitution cannot and does not apply to the internal rules and regulations of the corporate process.
[09:36.000 --> 09:50.000]  Why? Because the corporate process was never meant to affect the people, only official capacities in which people operate.
[09:50.000 --> 09:56.000]  For instance, police officer, that is an official corporate capacity.
[09:56.000 --> 10:01.000]  Mayor, that is an official corporate capacity.
[10:01.000 --> 10:09.000]  Joe Blow, live it in the middle of the city citizen, not a corporate capacity.
[10:09.000 --> 10:15.000]  The administrative courts were never meant to touch we the people.
[10:15.000 --> 10:20.000]  That's why the Constitution doesn't apply in those courts.
[10:20.000 --> 10:35.000]  Not because the court is extrajudicial and above any reach of the Constitution, it's because by sheer process alone, Constitution doesn't belong there.
[10:35.000 --> 10:37.000]  That's the whole reason behind this.
[10:37.000 --> 10:45.000]  That's why the judge says the Constitution has no place in this court because we the people have no place in that court.
[10:45.000 --> 10:50.000]  If we were supposed to be there, then the Constitution must naturally be allowed to follow.
[10:50.000 --> 11:14.000]  Because our administrative public servants and our legislature can't arbitrarily separate us as the people from our protected rights simply by redirecting us into an administrative process that acts to deprive us of those rights.
[11:14.000 --> 11:19.000]  Yet, folks, that is exactly what is going on here.
[11:19.000 --> 11:23.000]  These traffic courts have nothing to do with you and me.
[11:23.000 --> 11:25.000]  They never have.
[11:25.000 --> 11:37.000]  They regulate commercial capacities that are under the regulatory authority of our public servants.
[11:37.000 --> 11:50.000]  And that right there is the great distinctive difference between we the people traveling upon the highways and everyone else using them for commercial purposes.
[11:50.000 --> 12:12.000]  This state does not have the power to regulate we the people in our private travel and in the use of our private property in so far as we do not act or use that property to intentionally and directly cause harm to others.
[12:12.000 --> 12:33.000]  This is a lost concept on most Americans. Most Americans these days think that it's okay that government has rules and regulations to do this because if the government didn't have these rules, people would automatically be horrendous individuals that would do whatever they wanted regardless of who had hurt.
[12:33.000 --> 12:37.000]  That's an asinine presumption, people.
[12:37.000 --> 12:47.000]  Yes, there are idiots in this world. Yes, there are people that lack any ability to control themselves and act reasonably.
[12:47.000 --> 12:54.000]  But they're doing that anyway. Doesn't matter whether there's rules and regulations in place. They do it anyway.
[12:54.000 --> 12:59.000]  Which part of that is not coming through to you people out there?
[12:59.000 --> 13:08.000]  An idiot will be an idiot. No matter how many rules are get written down in some book.
[13:08.000 --> 13:16.000]  You know the idiot. He's the kind that says, hey, give me a match. I can't see where the gas is coming from.
[13:16.000 --> 13:28.000]  It's just stupidity. And a regulation or a statute or a law is not going to fix stupid. Just like a law wouldn't fix Michelle Obama being ugly.
[13:28.000 --> 13:46.000]  She just didn't going to fix anything. No matter what we do here, this all comes down to individual responsibility, individual decisions to act reasonably.
[13:46.000 --> 13:59.000]  Individual, oh wait, individual rights. Yeah, I heard bedtime stories about those things once when I was little. I haven't heard much about them lately.
[13:59.000 --> 14:09.000]  Sure has. Heck, I haven't seen them put into practice. What are we doing? Where does this common sense reasoning that we're supposed to have as Americans the problem solving nation of the world?
[14:09.000 --> 14:20.000]  You know, we were a great nation because we could figure things out. We were independent. We were individually responsible. We were individually motivated.
[14:20.000 --> 14:28.000]  We could be anything we wanted to be because we didn't have somebody else out there telling us they could do it for us and save us the trouble.
[14:28.000 --> 14:44.000]  And if someone did say they could do it for us, we laughed at them. Why would I trust you to do something for me that I know I could do myself and probably do better because I'm more motivated by my own self interest to do it right the first time?
[14:44.000 --> 14:53.000]  Then you could ever possibly be as a third party who just simply wants control of what I do.
[14:53.000 --> 15:07.000]  But we're being indoctrinated not to learn to think about individuality. We're being indoctrinated into collectivism, socialism, communism, you pick whatever ism, fascism, doesn't matter.
[15:07.000 --> 15:23.000]  Isms in my opinion suck, but right now we're chasing them down and hammering them onto our personalities left and right because we always think that it's better for someone else to do it than for us to be responsible.
[15:23.000 --> 15:27.000]  And that's just pathetic, people.
[15:27.000 --> 15:37.000]  So what have we here at Rule of Law decided to do about this? Well, we get on the air, we talk about these little fact-finding things we come up with here straight out of the statutes.
[15:37.000 --> 15:45.000]  We take these things like, ooh, these bar card attorneys that say, this should be a good motion. A judge should pay attention to this.
[15:45.000 --> 15:53.000]  Just to find out that when we go to the particular court in question, the judge goes, well, that has no bearing here.
[15:53.000 --> 15:58.000]  We are responsible for the mess we find ourselves in every single day.
[15:58.000 --> 16:04.000]  These articles that are here, let's take, for instance, 1.04 and 1.05 code of criminal procedure.
[16:04.000 --> 16:20.000]  What do those say? Article 1.04, due course of law, no citizen of this state shall be deprived of life, liberty, property, privileges, or immunities or in any manner disenfranchised except by the due course of the law of the land.
[16:20.000 --> 16:27.000]  Guess what, people? The law of the land does not mean statute.
[16:27.000 --> 16:38.000]  It means the common law and everything based upon that, like our state constitution, for instance, our federal constitution, for instance, should it actually exist.
[16:38.000 --> 16:46.000]  That's based on common law, which has a lot to do with common sense, which we're also seriously lacking in these days.
[16:46.000 --> 16:51.000]  Alright, Kevin, I see you on the line. Hang in there. I'm going to wrap this up on the other side and we'll start taking the callers.
[16:51.000 --> 17:20.000]  512-646-1984, folks. Give us a call. Don't leave us hanging. We'll be right back after the break.
[17:21.000 --> 17:41.000]  We're all tangy tangerine, and we're all great in tangy tangerine, tangy tangerine, tangy tangerine.
[17:41.000 --> 17:49.000]  Order Beyond Tangy Tangerine and other great young Jevity products at LogosRadioNetwork.com by clicking on the Tangy Tangerine banner.
[17:49.000 --> 17:56.000]  Sign up as a preferred customer for wholesale prices or become a distributor and support LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[17:56.000 --> 17:58.000]  So what do you say, Elvis?
[17:58.000 --> 18:01.000]  I'm going to learn more.
[18:01.000 --> 18:06.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:06.000 --> 18:10.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method.
[18:10.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute,
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:27.000 --> 18:34.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:50.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflogradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email Michael Mirris at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 19:12.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflogradio.com or email mishaelmirras.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:12.000 --> 19:41.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[19:41.000 --> 19:45.000]  Alright, call in number 512-646-1984.
[19:45.000 --> 19:48.000]  Okay, let's get on down through this here just a little bit more.
[19:48.000 --> 19:57.000]  Law of the Land, that is our common law, which is also known as the Law of Immemorial Antiquity.
[19:57.000 --> 20:06.000]  But the fact is, is the common law is what they mean when they say, do course of the law of the land.
[20:06.000 --> 20:12.000]  It is not statutory law passed by the legislature.
[20:12.000 --> 20:18.000]  Everybody needs to realize that and keep that at the forefront of their mind when dealing with these public servants.
[20:18.000 --> 20:23.000]  Now let's see what 1.05 tells us, rights of accused.
[20:23.000 --> 20:31.000]  In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have a speedy public trial by an impartial jury.
[20:31.000 --> 20:39.000]  He shall have the right to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him and to have a copy thereof.
[20:39.000 --> 20:43.000]  He shall not be compelled to give evidence against himself.
[20:43.000 --> 20:50.000]  He shall have the right of being heard by himself or counsel or both.
[20:50.000 --> 21:01.000]  He shall be confronted with the witnesses against him and shall have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.
[21:01.000 --> 21:08.000]  No person shall be held to answer for a felony unless on indictment of a grand jury.
[21:08.000 --> 21:22.000]  Now 1.04 and 1.05 are direct statutory codifications of the Bill of Rights out of the Texas Constitution.
[21:22.000 --> 21:29.000]  This is Article 1, Section 10, codified in 1.04 and 1.05.
[21:29.000 --> 21:33.000]  Now pay real close attention to 1.05.
[21:33.000 --> 21:46.000]  The first four words in all A, L, L, criminal prosecutions.
[21:46.000 --> 21:58.000]  Then it gives this whole list of things that you have as a right as an accused individual in all criminal prosecutions.
[21:58.000 --> 22:15.000]  Now this goes back to the part about where in the Sam Hill do our judges get the idiotic idea that the word all means everything but this.
[22:15.000 --> 22:28.000]  Somehow or other I missed that definition in English class way back in grade school and junior high and high school and college and every dictionary sense.
[22:28.000 --> 22:34.000]  All means every single instance.
[22:34.000 --> 22:41.000]  Yet when we go to these lower courts, which are the administrative courts,
[22:41.000 --> 22:49.000]  we do not have the right to assistance of counsel in what they are claiming is a criminal prosecution.
[22:49.000 --> 23:00.000]  Now remember this verb is just taken directly out of Article 1, Section 10, which also says in all criminal prosecutions.
[23:00.000 --> 23:05.000]  Again, just exactly how do we confuse that word?
[23:05.000 --> 23:07.000]  And yet they're doing it.
[23:07.000 --> 23:14.000]  You're not entitled to assistance of counsel at this level unless you're willing to go out and pay for it yourself.
[23:14.000 --> 23:23.000]  We're not required to grant it to you because you don't have to be put in jail for a class C fine only, it's only money.
[23:23.000 --> 23:26.000]  But you're calling it a crime.
[23:26.000 --> 23:29.000]  Yes, but we're not going to use the criminal rules.
[23:29.000 --> 23:32.000]  We're make them up as we go along.
[23:32.000 --> 23:37.000]  That's why you don't get counsel C. We're making them up as we go along.
[23:37.000 --> 23:41.000]  That's also why we don't have to give you notice.
[23:41.000 --> 23:43.000]  It's why we don't have to serve you.
[23:43.000 --> 23:49.000]  It's why we don't have to let you have anything that would be considered proper due process in these court.
[23:49.000 --> 23:54.000]  We can even turn around and deny you all the discovery you are entitled to in any other type of case,
[23:54.000 --> 24:00.000]  just in case it might prove exculpatory and you could win and we don't get our money.
[24:00.000 --> 24:05.000]  That's what it's about people, that and that alone.
[24:05.000 --> 24:08.000]  Now I figure that's enough entertainment right off the bat.
[24:08.000 --> 24:13.000]  Deborah does have an announcement that she needs to make and then we are going to start taking our callers.
[24:13.000 --> 24:16.000]  Kevin, Nick, hang on as soon as we get done.
[24:16.000 --> 24:18.000]  We probably will not get done this segment.
[24:18.000 --> 24:20.000]  We only got about five minutes left.
[24:20.000 --> 24:24.000]  So right after this segment, we will start taking your calls.
[24:24.000 --> 24:25.000]  Deborah, are you ready?
[24:25.000 --> 24:26.000]  Yes, I am.
[24:26.000 --> 24:27.000]  Thanks, Eddie.
[24:27.000 --> 24:32.000]  For those of you that did not listen on Friday who hadn't tuned in,
[24:32.000 --> 24:38.000]  we are going to be making this announcement repeatedly for the next several months.
[24:38.000 --> 24:43.000]  We are conducting a fundraiser for the network, for the Logos Radio Network,
[24:43.000 --> 24:47.000]  because we are in desperate need of funds right now.
[24:47.000 --> 24:52.000]  Last week, one of the main computers for the network went down.
[24:52.000 --> 24:59.000]  The mother board died and it could not be just swapped out because the technology was too old.
[24:59.000 --> 25:01.000]  They don't make them anymore.
[25:01.000 --> 25:02.000]  I couldn't find one.
[25:02.000 --> 25:09.000]  So I had to get a brand new mother board, build a new computer.
[25:09.000 --> 25:13.000]  Basically, there are other computers that need to be rebuilt.
[25:13.000 --> 25:22.000]  I was going to do this fundraiser before adding new students, as you can see,
[25:22.000 --> 25:27.000]  for mic cables and a microphone equipment here as well.
[25:27.000 --> 25:31.000]  We are limping as far as the equipment is concerned here, folks.
[25:31.000 --> 25:37.000]  I just had to dig into my pocket, my own pocket to the tune of over $1,000,
[25:37.000 --> 25:45.000]  to purchase the new components necessary to build a computer capable of doing what needed to be done on the network.
[25:45.000 --> 25:54.000]  Folks, I'll tell you, Randy and Eddie and I have all been consistently digging into our own pockets
[25:54.000 --> 25:58.000]  to pay the operating expenses of this network.
[25:58.000 --> 26:00.000]  Yes, we do have a few sponsors.
[26:00.000 --> 26:05.000]  However, most of them are on commission-based only.
[26:05.000 --> 26:11.000]  That means we only get paid if our listeners actually buy our sponsors' products.
[26:11.000 --> 26:15.000]  Since this is what I do for a living, when it really comes down to it,
[26:15.000 --> 26:22.000]  it's mostly been Jerry and Randy and Eddie that have been supporting this network.
[26:22.000 --> 26:27.000]  After what happened last week, I got to be honest with you guys, folks.
[26:27.000 --> 26:29.000]  We are tapped out.
[26:29.000 --> 26:33.000]  I don't have any more of a cushion.
[26:33.000 --> 26:39.000]  I don't have anything else socked away to pay for equipment if something else goes down.
[26:39.000 --> 26:40.000]  That was it.
[26:40.000 --> 26:46.000]  I used up all of the resources, all of the cushion that I have.
[26:46.000 --> 26:56.000]  We have been trying to drop the hint now for quite a while that we need help.
[26:56.000 --> 27:03.000]  Even donations have been trickling in, but folks, we're going to have to start doing a major fundraiser at least once a year
[27:03.000 --> 27:08.000]  in order to stay on the air because we've got other equipment that needs to be upgraded.
[27:08.000 --> 27:19.000]  The electric bill continues to go sky-high because our City Council keeps shutting down all of the power plants in Austin
[27:19.000 --> 27:27.000]  that are publicly-owned utilities in order to turn all the services of providing electricity to the citizens,
[27:27.000 --> 27:36.000]  turn it all over to the private sector monopoly in order to be able to get kickbacks and charge us outrageous amounts of money.
[27:36.000 --> 27:41.000]  Internet, the telephones, I mean, it is not free.
[27:41.000 --> 27:49.000]  Freedom is not free, and it is not free to put this show and to put this network on the air.
[27:49.000 --> 27:58.000]  Like I said, I just had to spend all of my cushion on setting up this new system, and that's it.
[27:58.000 --> 27:59.000]  It's the end of the line.
[27:59.000 --> 28:01.000]  I don't have any more savings.
[28:01.000 --> 28:03.000]  I can't float this anymore.
[28:03.000 --> 28:12.000]  And so, folks, I hate to sound the alarm like this that it's in such a danger zone, but if y'all value this programming,
[28:12.000 --> 28:15.000]  then I'm going to need some help, all right?
[28:15.000 --> 28:24.000]  I desperately need your help right now, and I don't like to ask for help very often because when I have asked for help before in the past,
[28:24.000 --> 28:34.000]  I've had some very rude listeners tell me things like, well, I'm really getting sick and tired of you talking on the air about how you can't pay your electric bill, Deborah.
[28:34.000 --> 28:35.000]  Well, guess what?
[28:35.000 --> 28:38.000]  I can pay my own electric bill, okay?
[28:38.000 --> 28:39.000]  Jerry is a great provider.
[28:39.000 --> 28:46.000]  He's a great husband and a great provider, and we can take care of ourselves personally, all right?
[28:46.000 --> 28:52.000]  And it's sick that I even have to explain this on the air that when I'm asking for money,
[28:52.000 --> 28:57.000]  I'm not asking for money to pay my own living expenses, all right?
[28:57.000 --> 29:01.000]  But I will say it again because I'm getting sick and tired of rude people telling me that.
[29:01.000 --> 29:09.000]  I am doing a fundraiser for the network, okay, to bring y'all this information.
[29:09.000 --> 29:14.000]  So, folks, I'm asking, please don't make me beg, all right?
[29:14.000 --> 29:17.000]  But we desperately need your help right now.
[29:17.000 --> 29:31.000]  The goal is to raise $7,000 by the end of January so that we can make the equipment upgrades that we need and to put a little bit aside so that we can cover the operating expenses.
[29:31.000 --> 29:43.000]  And I really am going to need to get close to at least $1,000 by the end of the week or else we're going to have trouble getting the bills paid for the network, not our personal bills.
[29:43.000 --> 29:45.000]  I will add once again.
[29:45.000 --> 29:51.000]  So, folks, anything that y'all could give right now, I would really, really appreciate it.
[29:51.000 --> 29:52.000]  I guess that's all for now.
[29:52.000 --> 29:55.000]  We'll be back on the other side and continue to take your calls.
[29:55.000 --> 30:00.000]  You can go visit the chip-in on the Logos radio network.com website.
[30:00.000 --> 30:05.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[30:05.000 --> 30:07.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:07.000 --> 30:12.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:12.000 --> 30:15.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:15.000 --> 30:18.000]  Thousands of my fellow force responders are flying.
[30:18.000 --> 30:19.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:19.000 --> 30:20.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:20.000 --> 30:22.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[30:22.000 --> 30:23.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:23.000 --> 30:24.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:24.000 --> 30:27.000]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[30:27.000 --> 30:53.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:58.000 --> 31:07.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy.
[31:07.000 --> 31:10.000]  And neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[31:10.000 --> 31:13.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[31:13.000 --> 31:14.000]  Brave New Books?
[31:14.000 --> 31:15.000]  Yes.
[31:15.000 --> 31:19.000]  Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones,
[31:19.000 --> 31:21.000]  Ron Paul and G. Albert Griffin.
[31:21.000 --> 31:25.000]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products and Calvin Soaps.
[31:25.000 --> 31:28.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[31:28.000 --> 31:29.000]  Go check it out for yourself.
[31:29.000 --> 31:33.000]  It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[31:33.000 --> 31:37.000]  Oh, by UT, there's never anywhere to park down there.
[31:37.000 --> 31:43.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility
[31:43.000 --> 31:45.000]  just behind the bookstore.
[31:45.000 --> 31:48.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[31:48.000 --> 31:53.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[31:53.000 --> 32:00.000]  So get them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[32:00.000 --> 32:07.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[32:15.000 --> 32:17.000]  Yeah, I got the warrant.
[32:17.000 --> 32:25.000]  And I'm gonna solve them, to the government them, prosecute them.
[32:25.000 --> 32:27.000]  Okay.
[32:33.000 --> 32:35.000]  Okay, folks, we are back.
[32:35.000 --> 32:40.000]  Just to finish up on my request for help here,
[32:40.000 --> 32:45.000]  the goal here is to raise $7,000 by the end of January.
[32:45.000 --> 32:52.000]  That will give us enough that we need to upgrade equipment that is limping, about to fail,
[32:52.000 --> 33:00.000]  and also it will give us enough to put a little bit aside for a few months to pay for the operating expenses
[33:00.000 --> 33:06.000]  while we finish the website and shop around to try to get more sponsors, all right,
[33:06.000 --> 33:13.000]  so that we're not just constantly riding the edge of being completely broke and in a crisis
[33:13.000 --> 33:16.000]  of are we gonna be able to keep it going this week or not?
[33:16.000 --> 33:19.000]  Are we gonna be able to pay the bills this week or not?
[33:19.000 --> 33:24.000]  It's very stressful on me to have to be in that situation pretty much all the time
[33:24.000 --> 33:31.000]  and right now we are in that situation big time because I just had to use up our entire cushion
[33:31.000 --> 33:38.000]  to replace needed equipment that had gone down that had to be replaced or else we wouldn't be able to stay on the air
[33:38.000 --> 33:46.000]  and now we don't have anything at all to pay for the bills that are coming up due this next week or two.
[33:46.000 --> 33:55.000]  So, folks, if I could at least get recouped for what I had to put out this last week,
[33:55.000 --> 34:02.000]  then that would be very helpful because then I can get the operating expenses paid for the next few weeks.
[34:02.000 --> 34:09.000]  So, the goal is to get at least $1,000, $1,500, if possible, by the end of the week
[34:09.000 --> 34:14.000]  and after that the goal is to raise a total of $7,000 by the end of January.
[34:14.000 --> 34:17.000]  So, folks, please help as much as you can.
[34:17.000 --> 34:22.000]  We are going to be pushing this fundraiser because we have to if we're gonna stay on the air.
[34:22.000 --> 34:26.000]  So, we don't want to sound like a broken record or be constantly asking for money,
[34:26.000 --> 34:29.000]  but like I said, I haven't really pushed for this.
[34:29.000 --> 34:34.000]  I haven't really asked for this for a long time, but now is the time that we do need it.
[34:34.000 --> 34:39.000]  So, I hope that that is clear what is going on here.
[34:39.000 --> 34:40.000]  All right.
[34:40.000 --> 34:45.000]  So, Eddie, you can take it away again and continue with the callers.
[34:45.000 --> 34:46.000]  Well, okay.
[34:46.000 --> 34:48.000]  I reckon we can get to that.
[34:48.000 --> 34:49.000]  Oh, wait.
[34:49.000 --> 34:50.000]  Hold on.
[34:50.000 --> 34:51.000]  Let me tell people how they can donate.
[34:51.000 --> 34:52.000]  I'm sorry.
[34:52.000 --> 34:59.000]  Go to ruleoflawradio.com or logosradionetwork.com, you'll see a chip-in for the fundraiser,
[34:59.000 --> 35:06.000]  and you can pay either through PayPal or you can pay through debit or credit card with the chip-in.
[35:06.000 --> 35:12.000]  If you would rather send cash or gold or silver, you can send it to the mailing address
[35:12.000 --> 35:22.000]  1616 South Lamar, number 112, Austin, Texas, 78704, or if you want to write a check, you need to write it to me,
[35:22.000 --> 35:27.000]  Deborah Stevens, and send it to that address because we do not have a bank account in the name of
[35:27.000 --> 35:29.000]  ruleoflawradio or logosradionetwork.
[35:29.000 --> 35:34.000]  If you write a check made out to those entities, I will have to send it back to you because there's
[35:34.000 --> 35:36.000]  no way that it could be cashed or deposited.
[35:36.000 --> 35:38.000]  So, those are the ways that you could donate.
[35:38.000 --> 35:44.000]  And of course, if you're going to send cash or silver or gold, please, please put it in an envelope
[35:44.000 --> 35:51.000]  and wrap it up with aluminum foil inside the mailing envelope so that it cannot be scanned
[35:51.000 --> 35:58.000]  and subsequently stolen by what maybe potential rogue employees at the U.S. Post Office.
[35:58.000 --> 35:59.000]  Okay, folks?
[35:59.000 --> 36:02.000]  Preferably, pay them tight so that they can't rattle or jingle.
[36:02.000 --> 36:03.000]  That's right.
[36:03.000 --> 36:07.000]  And if you're going to send stuff like that, send it certified mail so it can be tracked.
[36:07.000 --> 36:13.000]  Or if you're going to send valuables like gold or silver, even registered mail so it isn't assured.
[36:13.000 --> 36:14.000]  Okay.
[36:14.000 --> 36:15.000]  That's all.
[36:15.000 --> 36:16.000]  Thanks, Eddie.
[36:16.000 --> 36:17.000]  All right.
[36:17.000 --> 36:18.000]  All right.
[36:18.000 --> 36:20.000]  We're going to go to Kevin in Texas.
[36:20.000 --> 36:22.000]  Kevin, what can we do for you?
[36:22.000 --> 36:25.000]  Yeah, I just, I had a comment.
[36:25.000 --> 36:29.000]  I saw on your chip and you only had $275.
[36:29.000 --> 36:36.000]  And considering the value of this program, I encourage every listener, even if they're
[36:36.000 --> 36:46.000]  employed like I am, to send in at least $510, $15, and if they're employed, send in more.
[36:46.000 --> 36:48.000]  And I had a question.
[36:48.000 --> 36:54.000]  What do you think is the most important elected position in a county?
[36:54.000 --> 36:55.000]  Sheriff.
[36:55.000 --> 36:58.000]  That's what I thought you would say.
[36:58.000 --> 37:03.000]  I wanted to let everybody know, which I'm sure if they're regular listeners to this
[37:03.000 --> 37:08.000]  program that Raymond Frank is running for Travis County Sheriff.
[37:08.000 --> 37:09.000]  Yep.
[37:09.000 --> 37:11.000]  We're actually running a PSA for Raymond.
[37:11.000 --> 37:13.000]  He had me do the voiceover on.
[37:13.000 --> 37:14.000]  Yeah.
[37:14.000 --> 37:16.000]  I've heard that quite a few times.
[37:16.000 --> 37:19.000]  You know, he has gotten no donations.
[37:19.000 --> 37:25.000]  Well, I gave him his first one today and he needs volunteers.
[37:25.000 --> 37:33.000]  He needs places to put up four by eights and yard signs.
[37:33.000 --> 37:38.000]  And I mean, this is so critical to give this man our help.
[37:38.000 --> 37:43.000]  I know people that were born and raised in Austin that are 70-something years old and
[37:43.000 --> 37:49.000]  they had nothing but good to say about Raymond Frank.
[37:49.000 --> 37:50.000]  Hello.
[37:50.000 --> 37:51.000]  I think somebody picked...
[37:51.000 --> 37:53.000]  He bumped his keyboard or his telephone pad.
[37:53.000 --> 37:58.000]  I think somebody picked up another extension on his end and was starting to make a call.
[37:58.000 --> 38:02.000]  That's my Alzheimer's mother.
[38:02.000 --> 38:03.000]  Okay.
[38:03.000 --> 38:05.000]  That's one reason I'm unemployed.
[38:05.000 --> 38:08.000]  I have to stay here and take care of her.
[38:08.000 --> 38:17.000]  But I mean, the people in Travis County really need to step up to the plate and help out
[38:17.000 --> 38:23.000]  this man because otherwise it's going to be the same old BS.
[38:23.000 --> 38:29.000]  And, you know, he was endorsed by Ron Paul four years ago when he ran for a sheriff.
[38:29.000 --> 38:30.000]  Yeah.
[38:30.000 --> 38:33.000]  And he actually used to be the sheriff at one time.
[38:33.000 --> 38:34.000]  Yeah.
[38:34.000 --> 38:40.000]  He was sheriff in the 70s and I'm actually the one that's taking care of his website.
[38:40.000 --> 38:47.000]  And if folks, if you want to donate to Raymond Frank, then you can go to raymondfrank.com
[38:47.000 --> 38:49.000]  and go to the contributions page.
[38:49.000 --> 38:53.000]  And there are instructions there on how you can donate to Raymond's campaign.
[38:53.000 --> 39:01.000]  If you want to volunteer for his campaign, then you can send an email to contact at raymondfrank.com.
[39:01.000 --> 39:07.000]  You know, what's really incredible that phone number listed on his Raymond Frank webpage,
[39:07.000 --> 39:13.000]  that is his home phone number and he will answer it himself.
[39:13.000 --> 39:19.000]  I mean, how many people in a public office will do this?
[39:19.000 --> 39:22.000]  I don't know of any.
[39:22.000 --> 39:23.000]  He's really...
[39:23.000 --> 39:27.000]  Well, that's because they're only in public office while they're campaigning.
[39:27.000 --> 39:32.000]  After that, it becomes privately funded.
[39:32.000 --> 39:36.000]  Well, this guy, I mean, he's really amazing.
[39:36.000 --> 39:41.000]  I met this one guy that he had a buddy in Travis County Jail.
[39:41.000 --> 39:49.000]  He was fixing to go up for, I think, 20 years and Raymond Frank was so kind to this man.
[39:49.000 --> 39:55.000]  He let him go and meet with his families before he was sent up.
[39:55.000 --> 40:09.000]  And how many sharers would treat somebody with such respect to meet for the last time with his family before he went to the penitentiary?
[40:09.000 --> 40:11.000]  So, I just...
[40:11.000 --> 40:14.000]  We're at a critical juncture.
[40:14.000 --> 40:21.000]  If we all don't take action and make some sacrifice, this country will be lost.
[40:21.000 --> 40:28.000]  And we'll be down the road that they went in Germany under Hitler.
[40:28.000 --> 40:35.000]  So, I just encourage everybody to make some sacrifice with their time and their money.
[40:35.000 --> 40:45.000]  And we have to defend this great nation because without vigilance, it will be lost and then we're all sunk.
[40:45.000 --> 40:47.000]  And that's all I had to say.
[40:47.000 --> 40:53.000]  And I've really enjoyed, I hope you keep on about what we can do to fight these municipal courts.
[40:53.000 --> 40:56.000]  And I certainly thank you all for your effort.
[40:56.000 --> 41:00.000]  And I'm sorry, Deborah, that some rude people call and make some snide remarks.
[41:00.000 --> 41:02.000]  I guess they're just ignorant.
[41:02.000 --> 41:06.000]  But you all are doing a great job and I really appreciate it.
[41:06.000 --> 41:07.000]  Thank you.
[41:07.000 --> 41:09.000]  We appreciate that, Kevin.
[41:09.000 --> 41:10.000]  Thank you.
[41:10.000 --> 41:11.000]  Good night.
[41:11.000 --> 41:12.000]  Good night.
[41:12.000 --> 41:13.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[41:13.000 --> 41:14.000]  You're welcome.
[41:14.000 --> 41:20.000]  All right, again, folks, call in number 512-646-1984.
[41:20.000 --> 41:21.000]  Give us a call.
[41:21.000 --> 41:22.000]  We've got Nick on the board.
[41:22.000 --> 41:25.000]  Nick, what can we do for you?
[41:25.000 --> 41:26.000]  Hello, Deborah.
[41:26.000 --> 41:28.000]  Eddie, I hope you guys are doing okay.
[41:28.000 --> 41:31.000]  This was the first I've heard about the fundraiser.
[41:31.000 --> 41:34.000]  I'll certainly contribute and everyone else should as well.
[41:34.000 --> 41:39.000]  It's a good point, Deborah, you make about aluminum foil around the metal.
[41:39.000 --> 41:41.000]  I never thought to do that.
[41:41.000 --> 41:44.000]  It's a good idea.
[41:44.000 --> 41:47.000]  Yeah, that'll prevent them from X-raying it.
[41:47.000 --> 41:50.000]  Yeah, that's a good idea.
[41:50.000 --> 41:59.000]  But Eddie, I wonder how you would do about doing this or challenging an illegitimate four-way stop.
[41:59.000 --> 42:03.000]  That's completely illegitimate and everybody in the community suspected it.
[42:03.000 --> 42:10.000]  Okay, explain to me the reason for stating it's illegitimate.
[42:10.000 --> 42:19.000]  There's an MUTCD, which is the Federal Guidelines that all the states, most of the states, I guess, have adopted,
[42:19.000 --> 42:26.000]  for certain warrants that have to be met in order to put up these traffic control devices.
[42:26.000 --> 42:35.000]  There has to be a certain amount of traffic volume or a certain amount of accidents
[42:35.000 --> 42:42.000]  and two more warrants and it's just a little country rose there
[42:42.000 --> 42:46.000]  and lines maintained in very little traffic.
[42:46.000 --> 42:51.000]  Everybody suspected it, so I filed an authority with the state DOG
[42:51.000 --> 42:53.000]  and I got the information from them.
[42:53.000 --> 42:59.000]  In those documents they admit that they don't meet any of the warrants
[42:59.000 --> 43:03.000]  to put the traffic control in place
[43:03.000 --> 43:08.000]  and that it's a community partnership with the DOG and the community.
[43:08.000 --> 43:14.000]  And when they say the community, they mean just a church.
[43:14.000 --> 43:16.000]  That's what they're calling a community.
[43:16.000 --> 43:21.000]  And they held an open forum there in the county.
[43:21.000 --> 43:28.000]  People objected and they still decided to put the thing up.
[43:28.000 --> 43:34.000]  But don't meet any of the warrants of the MUTCD, those guidelines, and they admit it in there.
[43:34.000 --> 43:36.000]  Okay, well, hang on just a second, Nick.
[43:36.000 --> 43:38.000]  We'll finish this up on the other side here, okay?
[43:38.000 --> 43:39.000]  Okay.
[43:39.000 --> 43:42.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[43:42.000 --> 43:45.000]  Calling number 512-646-1984.
[43:45.000 --> 43:48.000]  This is the Monday Night Traffic Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[43:48.000 --> 43:49.000]  Give us a call.
[43:49.000 --> 43:54.000]  We're going to be slow here after Nick gets off the line, so get in line and get on now.
[43:54.000 --> 43:56.000]  We'll be right back after this break.
[43:56.000 --> 43:58.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:26.000 --> 44:28.000]  Now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:39.000 --> 44:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:50.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:50.000 --> 44:56.000]  tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[44:56.000 --> 45:01.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:03.000]  The Oklahoma City Bombing.
[45:03.000 --> 45:05.000]  Top 10 reasons to question the official story.
[45:05.000 --> 45:09.000]  Reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices.
[45:09.000 --> 45:13.000]  On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh
[45:13.000 --> 45:17.000]  and the Ryder truck report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators.
[45:17.000 --> 45:21.000]  The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone
[45:21.000 --> 45:25.000]  delivered the Ryder truck bomb to the Murrah building and detonated it.
[45:25.000 --> 45:29.000]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning,
[45:29.000 --> 45:33.000]  Dana Bradley, who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing,
[45:33.000 --> 45:37.000]  testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fabled John Doe number two,
[45:37.000 --> 45:39.000]  exiting the Ryder truck.
[45:39.000 --> 45:43.000]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators
[45:43.000 --> 45:49.000]  the day of the bombing, no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men
[45:49.000 --> 45:53.000]  in the days before the bombing, including when he rented the Ryder truck.
[45:53.000 --> 45:57.000]  And in some cases, have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:57.000 --> 46:23.000]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:23.000 --> 46:29.000]  Folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Okay, we're going to finish up with Nick.
[46:29.000 --> 46:32.000]  Alright, Nick, go ahead.
[46:32.000 --> 46:37.000]  Yeah, that's about it. They didn't even do an engineering survey on it.
[46:37.000 --> 46:42.000]  They admit that it was in no good to do one because it wouldn't meet any of the warrant.
[46:42.000 --> 46:46.000]  So they just put it up with a partnership with the community.
[46:46.000 --> 46:54.000]  And that's fine, that's fine, but the only time it ever gets any traffic is from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Sunday.
[46:54.000 --> 46:57.000]  And then it's 15 cars.
[46:57.000 --> 47:04.000]  So, but the poor guy who has to go through it, runs through it, can get the ticket though.
[47:04.000 --> 47:07.000]  They haven't got me because I can't give them the catch-by.
[47:07.000 --> 47:10.000]  I'd love to get caught running through that thing.
[47:10.000 --> 47:12.000]  But how would you go about getting the thing removed?
[47:12.000 --> 47:15.000]  Would you have to get the ticket so you could tell them that that way?
[47:15.000 --> 47:17.000]  Yeah, that is how you would have to do it.
[47:17.000 --> 47:19.000]  Otherwise, you wouldn't have standing to challenge it.
[47:19.000 --> 47:25.000]  Now, I don't know how it is there in North Carolina, but here in Texas, you have what's called a commissioners court.
[47:25.000 --> 47:28.000]  They're responsible for the things that are going on in that county.
[47:28.000 --> 47:43.000]  You could, if you have that petition, the commissioners court to have that removed because the county can tell the state it doesn't want those markings on particular sections of the road.
[47:43.000 --> 47:45.000]  Yeah.
[47:45.000 --> 47:52.000]  The problem is, two church members are on the county and the board of county commissions.
[47:52.000 --> 47:54.000]  That's why it's there.
[47:54.000 --> 47:56.000]  So, I could have problems with that.
[47:56.000 --> 47:57.000]  I'm not sure.
[47:57.000 --> 47:58.000]  I didn't know I had to get a ticket.
[47:58.000 --> 48:05.000]  I mean, then I could challenge it and then go back and sue in Texas for the fines, maybe.
[48:05.000 --> 48:07.000]  Yeah.
[48:07.000 --> 48:10.000]  Yeah.
[48:10.000 --> 48:12.000]  Okay.
[48:12.000 --> 48:17.000]  But nobody in the community likes the thing.
[48:17.000 --> 48:24.000]  People have to come through there, hauling cows, and it's real helpful to stop.
[48:24.000 --> 48:34.000]  And so, you think that's the best way to go is try to get caught and challenge it that way and then end the defense, bring out all the four-year documents.
[48:34.000 --> 48:36.000]  Is that how you would do it?
[48:36.000 --> 48:45.000]  Well, the thing is, the problem is, as long as it's marked, they're going to say it's legal, whether it meets the criteria or not.
[48:45.000 --> 48:56.000]  That's the issue because they're not going to let you bring in that to fight against the accusation they're making because they're not going to look at them as being related.
[48:56.000 --> 48:58.000]  Right.
[48:58.000 --> 48:59.000]  Now...
[48:59.000 --> 49:03.000]  That would show damages for something simple then, maybe.
[49:03.000 --> 49:15.000]  Well, like I say, you could just basically say the people of the county don't want it and force the county commissioners, if you have those, to have it removed.
[49:15.000 --> 49:25.000]  Or you could have the county commissioners put up a regulation signs that say between the hours of on such and such day.
[49:25.000 --> 49:27.000]  Yeah.
[49:27.000 --> 49:33.000]  It's only a four-way stop on Sundays between 9 a.m. and 1 or 2 p.m.
[49:33.000 --> 49:35.000]  Yeah.
[49:35.000 --> 49:37.000]  Okay.
[49:37.000 --> 49:39.000]  That sounds better than my idea.
[49:39.000 --> 49:41.000]  Try to get caught.
[49:41.000 --> 49:43.000]  And then...
[49:43.000 --> 49:53.000]  And then, through the county, through the damages, the fines are tripled. That'd be a lot of work.
[49:53.000 --> 50:12.000]  If you get a fine and prove that you weren't engaged in transportation when they tried to fine you, which is exactly what we're going after here, in my particular case, then, yeah, you absolutely can sue them for triple or whatever they fined you because it was a malicious prosecution suit.
[50:12.000 --> 50:19.000]  But you can sue them for a lot more than that because they will have committed several crimes against you in order to write that ticket.
[50:19.000 --> 50:21.000]  Yeah.
[50:21.000 --> 50:23.000]  Okay.
[50:23.000 --> 50:27.000]  Thanks, Eddie. Thanks, guys. I'll get out of your way.
[50:27.000 --> 50:29.000]  All right. You're welcome. Thanks for calling in.
[50:29.000 --> 50:31.000]  Sure.
[50:31.000 --> 50:33.000]  All right. That'll do it.
[50:33.000 --> 50:37.000]  All right, folks. Caller board is now empty. So y'all are going to have to listen to me ransom more. Nobody's calling in.
[50:37.000 --> 50:41.000]  512-646-1984.
[50:41.000 --> 50:47.000]  That's the number you need to be punched into your telephone right now so we can get to talking.
[50:47.000 --> 50:54.000]  While we're waiting on someone to do that, however, let's talk a little bit more about what we were going over in this speedy trial issue.
[50:54.000 --> 51:05.000]  Now, 1.04 and 1.05, I read both of those are specific legislative codifications of the Bill of Rights out of the Texas Constitution.
[51:05.000 --> 51:18.000]  Now, there are also a couple of other things in here, dealing specifically Article 1, Section 10, Texas Constitution. Well, that's where Article 1.04 and 1.05 Code of Criminal Procedure came from.
[51:18.000 --> 51:20.000]  Okay.
[51:20.000 --> 51:25.000]  And Article 1, Section 19 of the Texas Constitution.
[51:25.000 --> 51:28.000]  Well, let's look that up real quick and see what that gets us, shall we?
[51:28.000 --> 51:32.000]  Article 1, Section 19, Texas Constitution.
[51:32.000 --> 51:35.000]  Let's see what that tells us. You'll have to pardon me for half a second.
[51:35.000 --> 51:45.000]  The Texas State website where all these statutes and things are kept picks and chooses when it wishes to be fast and when it wishes to be slow.
[51:45.000 --> 51:49.000]  And it usually opts to be slow.
[51:49.000 --> 52:00.000]  Now, Article 1, Section 19, reads, thusly, deprivation of life, liberty, etc., due course of law.
[52:00.000 --> 52:05.000]  That is, 1.04 Code of Criminal Procedure.
[52:05.000 --> 52:17.000]  No citizen of this state shall be deprived of life, liberty, property, privileges, or immunities, or in any manner disenfranchised, except by the due course of the law of the land.
[52:17.000 --> 52:23.000]  And once again, folks, that is not statutory enactments by the legislature.
[52:23.000 --> 52:28.000]  That does not constitute the law of the land.
[52:28.000 --> 52:36.000]  Okay? The law of the land is not limited to the land of Texas.
[52:36.000 --> 52:42.000]  The law of the land is the land called America.
[52:42.000 --> 52:45.000]  And its law is the common law.
[52:45.000 --> 52:55.000]  The common law is applicable in every single state, republic, or whatever you want to title them.
[52:55.000 --> 53:03.000]  Okay? It is the law of the land known as America.
[53:03.000 --> 53:19.000]  Everything else has to comply with the law of the land and statutory law absolutely does not do that if they attempt to apply it to the people
[53:19.000 --> 53:28.000]  who have a right to live under the law of the land, not the statutes.
[53:28.000 --> 53:30.000]  See, big difference.
[53:30.000 --> 53:55.000]  You can't take my rights as one of the people and negate that right by attempting to make me subject to an administrative process to which the right can no longer be applied with the effect that the right that I inherently have can be denied in order to facilitate the administrative process.
[53:55.000 --> 54:00.000]  Now, if that sounds confusing, welcome to exactly how it's designed.
[54:00.000 --> 54:03.000]  But that is the way it is.
[54:03.000 --> 54:25.000]  It's intentionally made to appear as if it is something that applies to everyone when in fact it is a particular classification of a particular class of activity and or individuals engaging in a particular class of activity that the state has the power to regulate.
[54:25.000 --> 54:34.000]  And that folks is not you and me and our daily lives and the use of our private property. It simply isn't.
[54:34.000 --> 54:52.000]  But again, they have taken over the schools, they've taken over the public information of radio, television, they've even got the public broadcasting system completely inundated with the same rules and regulations that apply to the commercial networks.
[54:52.000 --> 54:59.000]  So you can't do any better there. I'm astounded Alex Jones could have survived as long as he did on PBS.
[54:59.000 --> 55:19.000]  Why? Because the TV media corporations were doing their dead level best to get the same rules and regulations implemented against that round of public access information as they were limited to in their own capacities as for profit corporations.
[55:19.000 --> 55:35.000]  The SCC and all those other folks in government that were supposed to regulate them had all these rules and regulations that says you can't do this, you can't show this, you can't say this, you can't promote this, you can't put this out for public consumption because so on and so on and so on.
[55:35.000 --> 55:49.000]  When they found out that the public broadcasting system didn't have any of those rules and regulations and it could actually be used for disseminating truth and facts and couldn't be restrained by government restrictions.
[55:49.000 --> 56:11.000]  The first thing they did was go to the powers that be in demand that the public broadcasting networks be shouldered and saddled and tied down with the same regulations that apply to those that are engaging in a regular commercial activity, which we know the public broadcasting system isn't for that.
[56:11.000 --> 56:27.000]  It's not for the purpose of making money. It was for the purpose of disseminating public information and making the ability to do that available to any member of the public.
[56:27.000 --> 56:41.000]  I mean, had all these things been in place or completely in place when Alex was doing his thing, nobody'd know who Alex is. He'd have never gotten syndicated because he wouldn't have been allowed to say anything, controversial.
[56:41.000 --> 56:44.000]  They'd have censored it.
[56:44.000 --> 57:03.000]  But now let's consider what they're doing. You can sit down on any night of the week, turn on your TV and you will have a landfill's worth of visual, verbal and auditory garbage dumped right into your living room.
[57:03.000 --> 57:18.000]  And it astounds me, the number of people in America that welcome that. I haven't sat down and watched actual television in 20 years. Can't stand it.
[57:18.000 --> 57:22.000]  I mean, it's garbage.
[57:22.000 --> 57:48.000]  Funniest thing ever put on TV, to my opinion, match. At least it talked about something that everybody was familiar with in that day and era, Korean War, which was basically synonymous with the Vietnam War in the 60s and so on and so forth as to why we were there and what we were doing and whatever.
[57:48.000 --> 58:13.000]  But at least it dealt with something, you know, more or less real. The rest of this stuff, if Americans live like they show it on TV, I'm telling you, we'd all be living in Beverly Hills, big wealthy mansions, driving cars, having affairs, illegitimate children and hoping nobody else in the family could find out about it before we could get some leverage on them to keep them quiet.
[58:13.000 --> 58:17.000]  Everybody would want to be JR.
[58:17.000 --> 58:24.000]  Alright folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[58:24.000 --> 58:29.000]  Caller board is empty. I need somebody to talk to.
[58:29.000 --> 58:50.000]  Alright, we'll be right back on the other side of the break. Get to dialing.
[58:50.000 --> 59:07.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.000 --> 59:28.000]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:48.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102, or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:17.000]  Every business you visit these days seems to want you to friend it on Facebook, but should you? It could lead to an ordeal straight out of a Kafka novel. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. Back to tell you how Facebook got an innocent woman arrested. Next.
[01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:47.000]  Let's say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Start Page.
[01:00:47.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  Liz Aston, a 28-year-old artist, used to think Facebook was harmless, till Toronto police used her profile to falsely accuse her of a crime in a bar she hadn't been to in months. Police told Aston the victim of a bar fight had identified her as the attacker. How?
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:23.000]  They created a suspect lineup using photos of the bar's Facebook friends, and the victim pointed to Aston's photo. Fortunately, she had an alibi, but it took her a lawyer thousands of dollars in four months in court to clear her name. So think twice before friending anything online. Remember, Big Brother loves social media too.
[01:01:23.000 --> 01:01:34.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:48.000]  Ew. What's the most bacteria-filled object in a hotel room? Not to be a germaphobe, but a new study shows there's one thing you may not want to touch. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and when I come back, I'll tell you what it is.
[01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:59.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:07.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy. It's worth hanging onto.
[01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:18.000]  This message is brought to you by startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with startpage.
[01:02:18.000 --> 01:02:29.000]  When I stayed hotels, I'm generally suspicious of the carpet, and I always give the bedspread a wide berth. Okay, call me a germaphobe, but a new study vindicates at least some of my paranoia.
[01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:40.000]  In a survey of hotels in three states, the American Society for Microbiology found that 81% of hotel room surfaces contain fecal bacteria, yuck.
[01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:52.000]  The worst offenders? TV remotes, followed by toilets and bathroom sinks. Light switches and phones also tested high for bacteria. Before using them, a little hand sanitizer might be in order.
[01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:56.000]  So which surface is safest? The headboard. But good luck eating off of it.
[01:02:56.000 --> 01:03:01.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:38.000]  1984 is the call-in number. Okay, now let's get back on this here for a little bit with this speedy trial issue about how these people seem to not understand or follow this.
[01:03:38.000 --> 01:03:54.000]  Now, like I say, 1.04 is a codification of Article 1, Section 19 of the Texas Constitution, 1.05 is a codification of Article 1, Section 10, Texas Constitution, and yet these lower courts just completely ignore any reference to that.
[01:03:54.000 --> 01:04:08.000]  In fact, these lower courts completely ignore any reference to the Code of Criminal Procedure at all. They pick and choose which parts of the Code of Criminal Procedure they want to obey when they want to obey them at all.
[01:04:08.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  For instance, right now, I've got a judge in Rockdale in another case that absolutely has ignored the motion to dismiss because of failure to provide notice, has violated several laws in his own right in what he's done.
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:39.000]  He has held an ex parte hearing on motions and he has ruled on motions despite the fact that the prosecuting attorney has filed no paperwork rebutting anything in the motions.
[01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:58.000]  Now, how are you supposed to call this a fair and impartial trial when the judge is acting suesponte, which means on his own, to deny motions when there is no legal rebuttal to those motions by the opposition?
[01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:17.000]  Wouldn't that mean that the judge is now attempting to act as the opposition and is upholding his own rebuttal to that motion by declaring it, you know, I'm not going to grant it. Your motion is denied. You can't have it.
[01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:36.000]  Well, judge, I'm sorry, but you're supposed to be fair and impartial. It's the prosecutor who has to tell you why I shouldn't get it. If the prosecutor has a problem with it, then let them respond in writing as to why I'm wrong, then you would have something to base your decision on.
[01:05:36.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  Right now, you are deciding that my arguments have no merit when you yourself haven't read any of it, nor have you offered up any contradictory law that would make my argument irrelevant or invalid.
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  But you're going to presume to deny it on behalf of the prosecution who's never objected to anything I said. Yeah, I can see where you're being fair and impartial with that. Sure, no problem. Sign me up.
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  Again, folks, if this had anything to do with the Constitution, if it had anything to do with anything other than an administrative proceeding, everything that judge is doing would be highly illegal.
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:44.000]  It would be the deprivation of rights. And yet, here they are doing it, and they're well aware that they can do it without any fear of repercussion. Why is that?
[01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  Where would this judge possibly get the idea that he could act in this fashion and not have to pay a penalty for it?
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:07:16.000]  Well, we go right back to what we were talking about, because it's an administrative proceeding where those particular sets of rights do not apply because it's an administrative proceeding. It was never criminal. It's not really civil the way that we understand a civil case.
[01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:38.000]  Though administrative is civil, it's a different kind of civil. Why? Because a civil case can apply to the general public. An administrative civil case, however, can only apply to those that are subject to the administrative rules and proceedings.
[01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  And that can never be the general public in their private capacity. It always has to be someone acting in a public capacity.
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:08:12.000]  That's exactly why the statutes say you have to be a driver or operator of a motor vehicle on a highway in this state. Those are all public capacities. A driver is someone acting in a commercial capacity.
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:36.000]  They're using public property for private gain. It's the public part. Okay? They're engaging in a regular activity in which the public has a vested interest to ensure the capabilities and expertise of the one engaging in it for the necessity of public safety and welfare.
[01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:46.000]  We go back to the example of the 80,000-pound SEMI barreling down the highway at 90 miles an hour under the control of someone that doesn't have a clue how it operates.
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:57.000]  Or the fact that 80,000 pounds does not stop in 132 feet like a 4,000-pound car wheel when you lock up the brakes.
[01:08:57.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  See just these little things that could affect public safety, you know? That's why they can be regulated.
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:19.000]  Now, what we've got to deal with here is these idiots saying that they're such a thing as a quasi-criminal process.
[01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:28.000]  Would someone please call in, write in, fax in, email in? I don't care.
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:41.000]  Get me the statute that says quasi-criminal. Get me the statute that says quasi-civil or quasi-administrative.
[01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:57.000]  It doesn't exist. So where did it come from? Oh, wait. I remember the same idiots in black that came up with these other idiotic doctrines that all doesn't mean everyone.
[01:09:57.000 --> 01:10:15.000]  That's who came up with it. I'm in real serious doubt about the capabilities of the people that man the benches in these courts.
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:31.000]  I mean, they couldn't get more bureaucratic and they certainly can't get more idiotic. And remember, these people are also products of the public school system, and you can tell that just by talking to them.
[01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:46.000]  A good example being that the lawyer who acted as the municipal judge back in Nacodotus where I'm from, the man was one lost brain cell shy being a talking monkey.
[01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  Okay? One more hard sneeze, one more stiff drink, and he would have been a babbling baboon with a bar card.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:02.000]  Yet, he's a municipal judge who obviously can't read, barely can write.
[01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:12.000]  Because I would take the book in there and show him the specific statute he was violating, and the idiot would go, well, I simply don't read it that way.
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:32.000]  Well, of course you don't. If you read it that way, you know you would be wrong and you would have to admit it. So you're going to fabricate a different way of reading it, but you're not going to put that way in actual writing so that an appeals court can see it and come back and smack you over the head with your own babbling gavel for being such an idiot.
[01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  Now, they may be generally stupid, but they are devious and conniving. So keep that in mind.
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:51.000]  Okay, we do have a callers popped up on the board here. Well, now we got two. All right, let's go to Chris. Chris, what can we do for you?
[01:11:51.000 --> 01:12:19.000]  Well, Eddie, I don't know if this is going to be a dumb question or not. It may be. But I was curious as to if you see an officer committing a crime on a videotape, and it's from his own dash cam, are you, would it be a stretch to file a criminal complaint against him
[01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:25.000]  based on, you know, witnessing it from the videotape that was from his own dash cam?
[01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:38.000]  Not as long as you can either completely describe the officer or know his name and recognize him. No. It doesn't matter where you get the information from that you believe a crime has been committed.
[01:12:38.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  Someone can tell you, you don't have to witness it. It can be hearsay. And if you believe the individual that's giving you the information, you can go write the complaint.
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:13:07.000]  Okay, because I mean, this came straight, you know, I saw it on YouTube, but I know it. I've also seen it on the news now where the officer over in Cleveland yanked that 77 year old grandmother up out of the car and, you know,
[01:13:07.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  I had arrested her because she was taking, I guess, a little longer to produce her license. And, you know, at first she was, you know, pretty much refusing to produce the license.
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:24.000]  But, you know, that's what he yanked her up out of the car for.
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:33.000]  Right? No, there's absolutely no reason why you can't file a criminal complaint against him. If you see a public servant committing a crime, it does not have to be in person.
[01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:41.000]  You can see him doing it on a video and you can readily describe accurately the individual or you can identify them and know their name.
[01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  Write it up. Send it to the grand jury. If you got to copy the video, send that with the complaint.
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:14:04.000]  Oh, okay. Well, I'll do that, too. Because I mean, it's just been, it's stuck with me for the last week and a half now, you know, seeing him yank her up out of that car, just stuck with me that, you know, he's committed a crime there.
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:18.000]  Yeah. Well, they do that every day. But the thing we've got to do here, we've got to start educating each other and making each other aware so that we can actually put people that have this knowledge
[01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:31.000]  on the grand juries. I mean, somebody, believe me, the powers that be the last thing in the world they want is a grand jury full of people like me.
[01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:45.000]  Amen. If there was a grand jury in any county in Texas, full of people like me, we would be handed down indictments for people in counties all over the state.
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:15:00.000]  And the people that we would be inditing would be their own worst enemy because we would have their news broadcasts, we would have their town hall meeting videos, we would have dash cams, we would have phone cams.
[01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:08.000]  We would actually be able to solicit more stuff than we could ever handle and probably get it.
[01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:24.000]  And once the people of Texas found out that there's a grand jury that's perfectly willing to indict public servants for criminal activity, we would never see the light of day again with the stuff we would be inundated with.
[01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  Amen. I'm with you on your opinion about the fact that they break the law to enforce the law. How is that any different than being a criminal? You're trying to...
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:57.000]  Well, the alleged criminal. You're not really a criminal if you can't produce a victim. And they definitely can't produce a victim in these cases. And even if they can, it's still an administrative act.
[01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  So the best that can be done is, since you're not under the administrative rules, is the two individuals have to work it out for themselves in court or in person.
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  Okay. The city, the state, nobody should be getting in the middle of this. Once something happens in a transportation area and you're not engaging in transportation, the state's got no say so there.
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  Then it becomes a matter of either peacefully resolving the issues of making restitution for your damages when you cause them to the other person or somebody's going to have to sue somebody and get restitution.
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:42.000]  The state's got no business being in it, nor does the city or anybody else with a badge or gun.
[01:16:42.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  Alright Chris, we're about to go to break. Hang on, we'll wrap this up with you on the other side. We got a couple of other callers on the board. Let's get some more. 512-646-1984. Let's get on a roll. We'll be right back.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  At Capital Coin & Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  Capital Coin features a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals. In addition to providing the best prices in the nation, we want to bring you the best shopping experience both in store and online.
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:34.000]  In addition to coins and bullion, we carry popular young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Roast. We offer freeze-dried, storeable foods by Augustin Farms, Bergy Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  You can lock in a spot price with our Silver Pool, and we set up Metals IRA accounts. Call us at 512-646-440 for more details.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:52.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. We're open Monday through Friday 10-6, Saturday 10-2.
[01:17:52.000 --> 01:18:14.000]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-440.
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:47.000]  Beyond Tangy Tangerine is available at Brave New Books, located at 1904.
[01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  Beyond Tangy Tangerine is available at Brave New Books, located at 1904.
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  The bookstore also carries the works of Dr. Joel Wallach, founder of Young Jeopardy and creator of Beyond Tangy Tangerine.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:23.000]  Beyond Tangy Tangerine is available at Brave New Books, located at 1904.
[01:19:23.000 --> 01:19:31.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. We're going to finish up with Chris and move on to Doug and Stephen.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:35.000]  Alright Chris, let's get it going here.
[01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:47.000]  Alright Eddie, I just want to say one more thing. I know y'all have lots of listeners, and anyone who is in or around the Cleburne area,
[01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  if we file enough criminal complaints over there, if there's enough people filing the same criminal complaint against this officer over there,
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:20:05.000]  we might be able to get their attention to, hey, we just go out here and we break the law.
[01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:11.000]  Just like the folks that were claiming break the law.
[01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:19.000]  And all they're doing is making a claim. They're claiming that you broke the law, and then they turn right around and they break it.
[01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  And then record some breaking it and go, hey, look, we can do it.
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  Yeah, well, we can definitely file complaints against them. It doesn't matter how we become aware of the crime.
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:41.000]  But if you actually see a video and you can identify a criminal act and you can identify the perpetrator either by description or by name,
[01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  by all means, let them have it.
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:49.000]  Alright, well Eddie, I sure appreciate the time and appreciate you answering my question.
[01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:51.000]  Yes, sir. Appreciate you calling in.
[01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:53.000]  Have a great night.
[01:20:53.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  You too.
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  Alright, now we're going to go to Doug in Texas.
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:04.000]  Pete and Doug, what can we do for you?
[01:21:04.000 --> 01:21:10.000]  When I was a little kid, I was taking studies, social studies or something that came up.
[01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:18.000]  The quasi, quasi, I went to my father who was, he wasn't a licensed attorney,
[01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:23.000]  but graduated at top of his class in law school.
[01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:27.000]  He chose not to pursue that.
[01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:31.000]  I said, what is quasi, I mean?
[01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:38.000]  The call springer told me that I shouldn't say this, but I'm saying in Spanish.
[01:21:38.000 --> 01:21:44.000]  Do you know what Medioculo means in Spanish?
[01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  Nope, can't say that dude with that pronunciation. What is it?
[01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  Okay, in English it's half AS. Is that bad or what?
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:57.000]  Well, that depends on whether you're talking about yours or a donkey.
[01:21:57.000 --> 01:22:01.000]  Okay, alright Eddie.
[01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:06.000]  But he told me that it says completely unconstitutional.
[01:22:06.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  What you're doing is you're taking the, we have three distinct branches,
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:20.000]  government, the executive, the legislative and the judicial.
[01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:26.000]  And so when it's quasi, that means half AS.
[01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  I hate to say that again, but half AS.
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  No, we sort it, we blended the two together, which we cannot do.
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  You know, we cannot do that.
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:46.000]  Well, just so everybody out there knows the term quasi, this is how it's defined in black's law.
[01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:53.000]  It's Latin and the meaning is as if, almost as it were.
[01:22:53.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  In other words, they're saying when it's quasi-criminal, it's almost as if it were criminal.
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:04.000]  Now, I've told people in class this and I'll say it for the benefit of everyone on air,
[01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  because I've said it here before too, but I'll say it again.
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  Something similar, something almost is not the same as that which is.
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:28.000]  Okay, something similar is never the same.
[01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:34.000]  It's not the original, it's similar, but it's not the original.
[01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  Well, that's exactly what quasi is in law.
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:45.000]  Someone's tried to define it as something similar to a crime, but it's not.
[01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:47.000]  Now, this goes on.
[01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:55.000]  This term is used in legal phraseology to indicate that one subject resembles another,
[01:23:55.000 --> 01:24:00.000]  with which it is compared in certain characteristics,
[01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:07.000]  but that there are intrinsic and material differences between them.
[01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:16.000]  A term used to mark a resemblance and supposes a difference between two objects.
[01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:21.000]  It is exclusively a term of classification.
[01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:31.000]  It implies that conception to which it serves as index is connected with conception with which comparison is instituted
[01:24:31.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  by strong superficial analogy or resemblance.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:42.000]  Moreover, it negates idea of identity,
[01:24:42.000 --> 01:24:52.000]  but points out that the conceptions are sufficiently similar for one to be classified as the equal of the other.
[01:24:52.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  It is often prefixed to English words implying mere appearance or want of reality
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:06.000]  or having some resemblance to a given thing.
[01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  That, folks, is what quasi is.
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  A similar imitation of the real thing.
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  Okay?
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:19.000]  That's all.
[01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  It's an imitation, but it's not the real thing.
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:28.000]  What they're telling you straight up is it's not a real crime.
[01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  That's why we don't use the real criminal rules to prosecute it.
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  That's why we make up criminal rules that look like the criminal rules.
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:44.000]  So now we're using quasi rules to prosecute a quasi crime.
[01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:47.000]  Where is due process to be found in that?
[01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:49.000]  Well, there isn't any.
[01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:52.000]  There's also no rights to be found in that.
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:26:00.000]  There's also no constitutional application to be found in that.
[01:26:00.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  You want to know where justice went?
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  It went with the existence of quasi rules straight to hell, just like they intended it.
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:13.000]  Does that help, Doug?
[01:26:13.000 --> 01:26:15.000]  Eddie, I love it.
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:24.000]  I launched you on that rant just by saying half ass, which is what it boils down to, right?
[01:26:24.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  That's exactly what it boils down to.
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:28.000]  All right, Eddie.
[01:26:28.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  All right.
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  Keep up the good work and you're an excellent gentleman.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:46.000]  If I just say half ass and you lost into a two minute rant,
[01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  it's exactly what I'm saying, the same thing.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:58.000]  You put it a little more eloquently, but all right.
[01:26:58.000 --> 01:26:59.000]  Well, it's okay.
[01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:02.000]  Elegance doesn't matter as long as it's understood.
[01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:03.000]  We're high.
[01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  All right.
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  All right.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:07.000]  Anything else, Doug?
[01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:09.000]  Yeah, I'll get it for tonight.
[01:27:09.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  All right, Doug.
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:11.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:27:11.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  Appreciate it.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:13.000]  I don't know.
[01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:14.000]  Talk to you later.
[01:27:14.000 --> 01:27:15.000]  All right.
[01:27:15.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  Have a good night.
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:17.000]  All right.
[01:27:17.000 --> 01:27:20.000]  Now we're going to go to Stephen in Montana.
[01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  Stephen, what can we do for you?
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:24.000]  Hey, Eddie.
[01:27:24.000 --> 01:27:33.000]  My question is about pleas of guilty and then are playing guilty.
[01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:39.000]  What does that do for being a stop you and going as soon for due process violations
[01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:42.000]  and what's up throughout the case that you put guilty to?
[01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:45.000]  Well, what due process violations do you intend to claim
[01:27:45.000 --> 01:27:50.000]  when you waived all those by pleading guilty?
[01:27:50.000 --> 01:27:59.000]  The moment you enter a plea, you waive virtually every right you have, including notice.
[01:27:59.000 --> 01:28:04.000]  If they've deprived you of notice, you waive personal jurisdiction.
[01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  Now the only argument you've got is lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:13.000]  So just exactly how do you get there if you've already done everything wrong to get yourself
[01:28:13.000 --> 01:28:14.000]  wrote in?
[01:28:14.000 --> 01:28:17.000]  That would be question number one.
[01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:25.000]  Well, right now I'm waiting on a post conviction for subject matter jurisdictional issues.
[01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:28.000]  Did you plead?
[01:28:28.000 --> 01:28:30.000]  Yeah, I did.
[01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  Okay.
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:34.000]  So what subject matter issues are you going to?
[01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:38.000]  An insufficient complaint to give the court jurisdiction.
[01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:39.000]  Sorry.
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  You entered a plea.
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:42.000]  The complaint is now irrelevant.
[01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:50.000]  The contents of the complaint don't matter the moment you enter a plea.
[01:28:50.000 --> 01:28:54.000]  Or didn't they bother to tell you that?
[01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:56.000]  No, they didn't tell me that.
[01:28:56.000 --> 01:28:57.000]  Yep.
[01:28:57.000 --> 01:29:00.000]  Texas has got case law on that and I'm quite sure every other state does too.
[01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:04.000]  The moment you enter a plea to the merits of a charge, the contents of the complaint
[01:29:04.000 --> 01:29:07.000]  and the charging instrument are moot.
[01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:12.000]  It does not matter their form or content, you've waived any right to object to it.
[01:29:12.000 --> 01:29:17.000]  Now, the only thing that can be raised at that point is if the complaint does not meet
[01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:19.000]  the requirements of law itself.
[01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:25.000]  And even then, the courts are still going to side with your conviction over your innocence
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:26.000]  in that regard.
[01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:29.000]  I can almost guarantee it.
[01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:30.000]  Okay.
[01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  Well, what if the complaint has nothing in place?
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  Well, you say it has nothing.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  It may have nothing to do with the charge you were convicted under, but if you waived
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  a written complaint for that purpose, what difference does it make?
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  Hang on just a second, Stephen.
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  We're going to go to break.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  All right, folks.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  Renee, I see you there.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:54.000]  Hang on.
[01:29:54.000 --> 01:29:56.000]  We'll get you after Steve on the other side of this break.
[01:29:56.000 --> 01:29:57.000]  Give us a call, folks.
[01:29:57.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:06.000]  A Noble Live, Oklahoma City, 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature
[01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  of terrorism.
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  Based on the damage pattern to the building, but the government sends impossible.
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:14.000]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  Expose the cover up now at InnobleLive.com.
[01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:36.000]  The Rule of Law Radio Network is proud to present a due process of law seminar hosted by our
[01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  own Eddie Craig.
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:41.000]  Eddie is a former Nacodotius sheriff's deputy, and for the past 21 years he's been studying
[01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  the due process of law and now offers his knowledge to you at his seminar every Sunday
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:51.000]  from 2 o'clock to 5 o'clock at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:30:51.000 --> 01:30:55.000]  Admission is $20, so please make plans to come by and sit with Eddie and learn for yourself
[01:30:55.000 --> 01:31:00.000]  what the true intent of law really is.
[01:31:00.000 --> 01:31:06.000]  At hempusa.org, we offer chemical-free products to people around the world, detoxifying, self-healing,
[01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest-selling product, micro-plant powder.
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:20.000]  Our micro-plant powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc, and silica to help rebuild
[01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:25.000]  the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora. Micro-plant powder is excellent
[01:31:25.000 --> 01:31:28.000]  for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:31:28.000 --> 01:31:32.000]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org.
[01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  And remember, all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:41.000]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality, and rapid shipping anywhere.
[01:31:41.000 --> 01:31:45.000]  And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  That's 908-6912608.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:32:00.000]  See what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:32:30.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:42.000]  We've got about half an hour left in the show.
[01:32:42.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  Right now we're talking to Stephen in Montana.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:46.000]  Hi Stephen.
[01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:54.000]  Yeah, entering that plea, that really is pretty much running around pounding the nails in your own coffin, Litman.
[01:32:54.000 --> 01:33:04.000]  Well, I got case law that says that, you know, you wave constitutional questions when you plead guilty,
[01:33:04.000 --> 01:33:08.000]  and you wave all kinds of different things, but you don't wave jurisdiction.
[01:33:08.000 --> 01:33:14.000]  No, you can't wave subject matter jurisdiction, but you can wave personal jurisdiction.
[01:33:14.000 --> 01:33:16.000]  Right.
[01:33:16.000 --> 01:33:24.000]  But if the complaint is insufficient, the state did not invoke the jurisdiction of the court.
[01:33:24.000 --> 01:33:28.000]  If the complaint or an information in Montana, they can do it by complaint.
[01:33:28.000 --> 01:33:32.000]  But if the complaint is wholly insufficient on its face, how does the court even...
[01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:34.000]  Because there's no facts in the complaint at all.
[01:33:34.000 --> 01:33:36.000]  There's no facts.
[01:33:36.000 --> 01:33:42.000]  It just has acronyms and in the name of the statute, which all doesn't cite any of the subsections,
[01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:44.000]  because these subsections are different elements.
[01:33:44.000 --> 01:33:53.000]  That's what I was saying about if the complaint does not meet statutory requirements, then you can possibly still challenge it on that ground.
[01:33:53.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  But I guarantee you, you better have case law supporting that decision.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:33:59.000]  I do.
[01:33:59.000 --> 01:34:02.000]  I have all kinds of case law, and that's kind of what I'm going afterwards.
[01:34:02.000 --> 01:34:13.000]  But not only that, when I plead a dismissed original charge, and I plead guilty to another charge who are reckless driving,
[01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:17.000]  and then I signed the plea agreement, went to court, got sentenced,
[01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:20.000]  got my first charge dismissed.
[01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:26.000]  They didn't dismiss that charge until like 20 days after I plead, got sentenced.
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  And then I went back in the court record, and there's nothing even...
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  There's no complaint at all on the record or nothing.
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:33.000]  There's nothing for the reckless driving charge.
[01:34:33.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  I mean, it's not in the record.
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:35.000]  It's not there.
[01:34:35.000 --> 01:34:40.000]  And they didn't follow the procedure of they have to ask the court for a leave to amend,
[01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:44.000]  put an act per day that was attached in order to amend the complaint.
[01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:45.000]  Well, they didn't do it.
[01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:47.000]  They didn't ask the court for a leave to amend it up.
[01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  So I think in the record, they signed the plea agreement.
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:52.000]  But there was no charge for reckless driving.
[01:34:52.000 --> 01:34:54.000]  They didn't even follow the procedure.
[01:34:54.000 --> 01:34:57.000]  So it wasn't tied for a sectional issue, too.
[01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:01.000]  Do they have to invoke the court's jurisdiction by getting leave to amend?
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:03.000]  Am I correct on that?
[01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:07.000]  Well, they're not going to invoke the court's jurisdiction by the leave to amend.
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  They're going to invoke it by filing a proper complaint if a complaint's the only thing required.
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:21.000]  So if they got leave to amend, then until they actually do amend, how did they proceed forward in the case?
[01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:23.000]  That would be the first thing.
[01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:26.000]  How can you proceed forward on a non-existent complaint?
[01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  But then again, they do exactly the same thing here all the time.
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:38.000]  They'll move completely through till trial, and then they may or may not produce a complaint even at trial.
[01:35:38.000 --> 01:35:39.000]  Right.
[01:35:39.000 --> 01:35:40.000]  Well, I'm in the...
[01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  I just appealed to the Supreme Court of the State of Montana on this issue.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:46.000]  And the district court didn't even...
[01:35:46.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  They didn't...
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:50.000]  I had a 70-page brief, and all of it was that issue.
[01:35:50.000 --> 01:35:57.000]  And also another issue was filing an affidavit with Case Law in Montana that says that they automatically lose jurisdiction.
[01:35:57.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  They can't proceed no more in the case.
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:06.000]  The judge has to take the case to the next district judge to hear the affidavit prejudice,
[01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:10.000]  but the justice of the peace can't proceed any further.
[01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:17.000]  And while the justice of the peace ruled on her own affidavit and in rules of professional judicial conduct,
[01:36:17.000 --> 01:36:21.000]  specifically in there says that they can't rule on their own affidavit prejudice.
[01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  Well, anyways, they didn't do any of that.
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:28.000]  So the affidavit prejudice also moved the judge from having any jurisdiction going any farther.
[01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  I got a good case law on that here.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:33.000]  So I'm just wondering, like, issues like that.
[01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  Actually, the judge for proceeding further in sentence meeting without a complaint or an amended complaint for reckless driving
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:45.000]  and for proceeding on with an affidavit and affidavit prejudice on the record.
[01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:50.000]  I mean, those are all jurisdictional issues from what I read of Case Law.
[01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:52.000]  Okay.
[01:36:52.000 --> 01:37:01.000]  And those are the types of things I'm asking and pursuing for, you know, for the complaint being insufficient on its face
[01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:03.000]  because it states no facts whatsoever.
[01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:05.000]  It doesn't state one element of the crime.
[01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:10.000]  All it is is an acronym that supports factual allegations of the complaint.
[01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:17.000]  So, you know, notice, you know, violations of the Fifth Amendment, nature and cause.
[01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:23.000]  I mean, you know, things like that.
[01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:28.000]  Fair, fair, fair judge, fair and partial trial judge.
[01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:30.000]  I can't think of what amendment that would be.
[01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  But, you know, like, 1983 statute for suits, false imprisonment, stuff like that.
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  Yeah.
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:42.000]  I mean, is that legit?
[01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  If you can get the conviction overturned, yes, but unless the Supreme Court in your state agrees with you and overturns it,
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  you can't, you're not going to have a cause of action.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:56.000]  Okay.
[01:37:56.000 --> 01:38:01.000]  So, what about my statute of limitations because my three-year statute of limitations is up in a couple weeks
[01:38:01.000 --> 01:38:03.000]  and I was going to notice the county attorney.
[01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:09.000]  Well, that's exactly the reason they delay this stuff for so long so the statute of limitations runs out.
[01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:12.000]  The only way you can do it is to file suit.
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:18.000]  But unless you get it overturned, if it's heard at the federal level before your case is overturned,
[01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:22.000]  the judge is going to turn around and say you have no case and he's going to throw it out.
[01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:28.000]  In which case you'll be passed your statute of limitations then and then you're not going to be able to refile it all.
[01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:33.000]  So, the only thing I would have after that would be malicious prosecution because that doesn't start
[01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:37.000]  and tell your case of an overturned, the statute of limitations, right?
[01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:42.000]  Again, you'd have to check the particular law of your status of when it would start.
[01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:43.000]  Okay.
[01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  Well, what about this?
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:56.000]  So, I was going to go after the county as municipal and respondent superiors for involving them
[01:38:56.000 --> 01:39:03.000]  because of practice, custom and usual business because this county does this stuff all the time.
[01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:13.000]  What if I give the county commissioners notice, you know, make a claim with them before my statute of limitations are over?
[01:39:13.000 --> 01:39:16.000]  Then see what they say, will that hold my statute of limitations, do you think?
[01:39:16.000 --> 01:39:19.000]  That's not the same thing as a lawsuit.
[01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:26.000]  Making a claim against their insurance policy is not the same thing as filing a suit.
[01:39:26.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  Well, I wasn't really talking about making a claim with their insurance, just noticing the county attorney.
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  They're still not filing a suit.
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:42.000]  The suit has to be filed before the statute of limitations runs out.
[01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:49.000]  Well, maybe I'll just file a suit and leave it dormant.
[01:39:49.000 --> 01:39:51.000]  Well, that's up to you.
[01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:56.000]  But if you're doing it at the federal level, you're talking $400 plus, you won't see it again if they kick it back.
[01:39:56.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  Yeah, I know.
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:03.000]  And I'm not going to do it in the state court.
[01:40:03.000 --> 01:40:10.000]  All right, well, shoot, I was just up here on a bind and trying to figure out what to do with that.
[01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:11.000]  Okay.
[01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:17.000]  But I think, you know, if the Supreme Court does overturn it, I think the only thing I'd have them to be in list is prosecution,
[01:40:17.000 --> 01:40:26.000]  because list is prosecution statute of limitations doesn't start until you notice that you want to prosecute it.
[01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:28.000]  I believe, right?
[01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  Say that one more time.
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:35.000]  Um, list is prosecution statute of limitations doesn't start until you're going to know.
[01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:39.000]  Again, you're going to have to see what your state ruling is on that.
[01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:43.000]  The case law of your state will tell you when they determined it applies.
[01:40:43.000 --> 01:40:53.000]  In federal court, I don't, I'm not sure if it's two years after the initial prosecution begins or two years after it's overturned.
[01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:55.000]  I don't know.
[01:40:55.000 --> 01:40:58.000]  Okay.
[01:40:58.000 --> 01:40:59.000]  Yeah.
[01:40:59.000 --> 01:41:03.000]  I don't want to go telling you one thing and it turned out it'd be something else.
[01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:05.000]  Yeah.
[01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:09.000]  I'm pretty sure it's my state, though. It's two years, one.
[01:41:09.000 --> 01:41:15.000]  Well, if you're suing in the Fed, it won't be what's particular to your state. It'll be what's particular to your district.
[01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:18.000]  Oh, yeah.
[01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  Okay. Well, that's all it is, and I'll just let you know how the case in the Supreme Court turns out.
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  Okay.
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  All right. Thank you.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:29.000]  You're welcome.
[01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  Bye.
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:31.000]  Bye.
[01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:36.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Renee in Texas. Renee, what can we do for you?
[01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  Hey, Eddie.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:49.000]  This is Renee. I was calling to ask you a few questions about DOTs in Houston, in the Houston area. We get pulled over all the time.
[01:41:49.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  Well, right now, my driver's license is suspended, so I don't drive anymore. I don't work on one.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:42:07.000]  But prior to that, I used to be a truck driver and I'll get pulled over so many times in a year, maybe about eight and nine times, just for random inspection.
[01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  So they'll pull you under a bridge, and I'm pretty sure you've talked about this before.
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:22.000]  However, I'm recently a new listener. I've been listening for about a week now.
[01:42:22.000 --> 01:42:33.000]  And so I don't know this information, but judging by your show, I assumed that you talked about this before.
[01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:44.000]  I'd like to see if you've had any advice on what to do when the DOT pulls you over for no reason.
[01:42:44.000 --> 01:42:52.000]  Is there a law that says they can't do that or they have to abide by?
[01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:56.000]  Okay. The law on a commercial driver is administrative.
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:43:03.000]  And while you're operating in that administrative capacity, they can do anything that the statute allows them to do.
[01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  They can pull a commercial motor vehicle over for inspection at any time.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:18.000]  They have the ability to declare that vehicle out of service, the driver out of service, to impound in certain cases, and so on and so forth.
[01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:25.000]  And they can do it at any place in the entire state, Port of Entry, Open Highway, you name it.
[01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:29.000]  As far as a commercial driver goes, no.
[01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:36.000]  They don't even have to give you articulable probable cause if you're in a commercial vehicle.
[01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:42.000]  They simply have to state that they were enforcing the administrative statutes and you're subject to them.
[01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  Okay. And they can search your vehicle?
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:46.000]  Yes, they can.
[01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  Hang on just a second. We're going to take a break. We'll be right back.
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:50.000]  All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:55.000]  Calling number 512-646-984. We're going to have one segment left.
[01:43:55.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  Terry, I see you. Hang on. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:06.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy.
[01:44:06.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  And neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Brave New Books?
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:20.000]  Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:24.000]  They even stock Interfood, Berkey products, and Calvin Soap.
[01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:44.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[01:44:44.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:52.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[01:44:52.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:14.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[01:45:14.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:02.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EV.
[01:46:02.000 --> 01:46:24.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. We are talking to Renee in Texas. Alright Renee, let's wrap this up.
[01:46:24.000 --> 01:46:34.000]  Commercial speaking, they can do virtually anything short of attack you as a human being, then your individual rights will kick in.
[01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:41.000]  But in your commercial capacity, what they can do to you is virtually unlimited.
[01:46:41.000 --> 01:46:45.000]  Okay, so the best thing to do is get out of the business.
[01:46:45.000 --> 01:46:51.000]  If you want to have actual individual rights that you can enforce consistently, yeah.
[01:46:51.000 --> 01:47:01.000]  Okay, okay. Yeah, because I mean, it seems like it's the business now. I mean, they pull you over and they give you a ticket for any of those inspection trucks.
[01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  And they'll see the smallest air leak or whatnot, even if it's not very dangerous, they want to give you a ticket.
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:15.000]  They'll use that to generate revenue for the city or for their county or for their opponents or something.
[01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:32.000]  And I don't know if eight times that I went last year to court based on some tickets, they were all dismissed because I would go to court, be not guilty, and then the cop never shows up.
[01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:48.000]  So I didn't get none of those. But the fact that, to me, I feel like it's just a waste of time. They take your time off. They'll make you lose time and lose money because you have to go up here to court.
[01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:58.000]  And it's just horrible to be like that, eight times in a year. Horrible.
[01:47:58.000 --> 01:48:02.000]  Well, I would have to agree with you.
[01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:08.000]  Okay, so there's pretty much nothing you can do just to it.
[01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:17.000]  Not as a commercial driver. As a commercial driver, you've pretty much put yourself at risk in that commercial capacity.
[01:48:17.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  Like I say, they can't violate your individual rights as a man, but anything relating to that commercial capacity and the activity that you agreed to be regulated under, right there, the doors wide open, prop back and nailed.
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:43.000]  Okay. All right. Well, that pretty much answers my question then. Thank you, Eddie.
[01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:46.000]  You're welcome. Thanks for calling in.
[01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:55.000]  All right, now we're going to go to Terry in Michigan. Terry, what can we do for you? Somebody said you had a question on the Yahoo Group's No Drivers license.
[01:48:55.000 --> 01:48:59.000]  Yeah, first of all, am I speaking with John Wayne?
[01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  Yes, you are. And actually several of the people in that group are actually students of my seminar and my class.
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:08.000]  Oh, excellent.
[01:49:08.000 --> 01:49:11.000]  Captain Rob, for instance, is one of those.
[01:49:11.000 --> 01:49:22.000]  Oh, yeah, wait, he was one of the people I wanted to talk to about. What I was wondering is, you know, I heard about the group from you. You had told me about it.
[01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:30.000]  And I signed up and I haven't really put any information in, but I've been checking all the messages and stuff.
[01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:41.000]  And I don't know, there's been a lot of off topic stuff going on there, but all of a sudden, lately Captain Rob got back on there.
[01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:48.000]  And between Captain Rob and Thomas, they seem to be really on target, the same as you are.
[01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:57.000]  Yeah, that's because the information they're basing everything on originated with me and they've expanded upon it through their own studies.
[01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:06.000]  Yeah, okay, great. I was just wondering if you'd ever talk to them to see if they might come on the show with you because it seems like, you know,
[01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  reading what they've posted that they're pretty much right on topic and they know what they're talking about, same as you.
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  And they'd be good guys to have on as guests.
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:32.000]  Yeah, I haven't actually talked to the gentleman that's posted there as Captain Rob in a while. And in fact, a couple of posts ago, he said he's been out of the country for the past six months doing something or other.
[01:50:32.000 --> 01:50:43.000]  But yeah, I've talked to him several times and he's actually posted that he's posted information about the seminar and rule of law and everything on there in the past.
[01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:51.000]  That's where he got a lot of his strategies for going to court and filing paperwork from was from us.
[01:50:51.000 --> 01:51:04.000]  But out of respect for the hard work I'd put into it, he was not going to be posting any of those documents on the forum, though he would talk about the contents and the arguments, which that's fine by me.
[01:51:04.000 --> 01:51:19.000]  But yeah, I mean, if he's out there listening or anything or if you want to send a post to him to have him give me a call on the email or something, I'll be happy to talk to him and see if he wants to come on and discuss it one of these Monday nights or so.
[01:51:19.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  Yeah, that'd be great because I gotta tell you, I think when you have other people that have an understanding like you do, when they come on and you guys discuss it together, it makes it easier for the rest of us to understand.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:42.000]  Yeah, provided no wrong directional or wrong headed ideas have crept into the mix since last time y'all agreed about something, I would say that's true.
[01:51:42.000 --> 01:51:45.000]  Okay.
[01:51:45.000 --> 01:52:02.000]  You can never say never, but from what I've watched with Captain Rob, he's like me in the fact that he is not going to just fly off the hand on any direction spouting all kinds of statements that he can't substantiate.
[01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:07.000]  Like me, he wants to be able to prove what he says.
[01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:15.000]  That's what it sounds like. And what about Thomas, who's got the forum set up there?
[01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  I've spoken directly with Thomas, but I don't know if I've ever actually met Thomas.
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:35.000]  I do know that that group originally started here in Texas, I'm pretty sure, and that's where Thomas is, I believe, but I've never talked to him outside of the forum that I'm aware of.
[01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:39.000]  Now Rob, I have. He's actually been down here to the class.
[01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:49.000]  In fact, one of my other students, Hondo, I believe, posts on there from time to time as well in the stuff that he's found out and that he does.
[01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  But I'm not 100% positive. There are several people on there that try to make themselves look like each other.
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:53:06.000]  And then, of course, you have that one guy that seems to be able to spout every piece of case law from the very first time recordings of case law was ever made.
[01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:20.000]  And some people think he's either an automated computer script or he's a fed with access to a federal case law database that's out there trying to unhinge the group.
[01:53:20.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  I think it's Patrick and Patrick in California is how he posts.
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:29.000]  Okay, yeah, I'm familiar with that.
[01:53:29.000 --> 01:53:39.000]  Well, it would be nice if you could get a couple of them guys on there because, like, for a lot of us listening, you know, I'm up in Michigan and there's a lot of people in other states and stuff.
[01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:55.000]  It would be nice if there's somebody that's really got the knowledge and knows how to do the research that could help some of us out with trying to get some of that information converted to other states.
[01:53:55.000 --> 01:53:59.000]  That'd be pretty cool.
[01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:00.000]  Yeah.
[01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:06.000]  Well, I agree. If you can get them to reply back to you, it was, like I say, Rob hadn't been on there in a while.
[01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:18.000]  Yeah, I saw in his last post, like, four or five days ago that he said he'd been out sailing around the world and came back and he's back checking things out.
[01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:19.000]  Yeah.
[01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:20.000]  All right.
[01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  Well, like I say, shoot a post out there, let them know, and just have them get in touch with me.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:29.000]  Okay, excellent.
[01:54:29.000 --> 01:54:37.000]  Yeah, I only post out there every once in a while and usually it'll be right after I see somebody say or do something really stupid.
[01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:38.000]  Yeah.
[01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:47.000]  And I'll go out there and I'll post and I'll go, what in the world made you think that was a good idea?
[01:54:47.000 --> 01:55:01.000]  Well, you know, in that forum there, you see a lot of good stuff and then you see a lot of the patriot myths that are going to get people in trouble.
[01:55:01.000 --> 01:55:11.000]  You know, without actually going sticking with the law, which is, you know, after coming down to the seminar down there a couple of years ago and stuff,
[01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:19.000]  that was something that I learned that has really helped me a lot in a couple of different things, not just with traffic, but with other things where, you know,
[01:55:19.000 --> 01:55:26.000]  sometimes it's just as simple as sit down and read the law and you'll find out that most of these people have no idea what they're talking about.
[01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:36.000]  Yeah, that's one of the reasons why I don't post on there a whole lot because the water's already said, Dad, blame muddy, you can't see the swim to a point.
[01:55:36.000 --> 01:55:45.000]  I just avoid it till I see something that's extremely ignorant pop up and it'll be like, guys, that one I can't let slide.
[01:55:45.000 --> 01:55:50.000]  Let's hash that out now.
[01:55:50.000 --> 01:56:01.000]  But yeah, like I say, just put a post up there and let them know, you know, Target Captain Rob and, you know, Thomas would be fine.
[01:56:01.000 --> 01:56:09.000]  And I'd be happy to talk to them off the line and see if they would like to come on and discuss it one Monday or Friday.
[01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:15.000]  Yeah, that'd be great. I think that would really, you guys could really get in some stuff that would help people a lot.
[01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:18.000]  It'd be pretty doggone interesting to listen to.
[01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  Yeah, lots of ideas are always better than individual ideas.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:28.000]  Of course, take that with a grain of salt because that also depends on who's putting them out there.
[01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:30.000]  That's absolutely correct.
[01:56:30.000 --> 01:56:35.000]  But as the old saying goes, even a broken clock's right twice a day.
[01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:39.000]  Yep. Okay, Eddie, well, thanks for that. Appreciate it.
[01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  All right, Terry. Thanks for calling in. Appreciate it.
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:46.000]  All right. All right. All right, we got a little less than two minutes.
[01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:52.000]  We got Chris back on the line. Chris, you said you had something you wanted to throw back in here before we got off.
[01:56:52.000 --> 01:56:59.000]  Yeah, that gentleman that was asking about statute limitations and, you know, for federal court.
[01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:00.000]  Yeah.
[01:57:00.000 --> 01:57:03.000]  As far as once the charges have been dismissed.
[01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:04.000]  Yeah.
[01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:11.000]  It's four years. It's federal rules of civil procedure 12, B1 and 6.
[01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:26.000]  All right, Stephen in Montana, he is talking to you. Federal rules of civil procedure 12, Bravo 1 and 6 for your statute of limitations on your malicious prosecution action.
[01:57:26.000 --> 01:57:29.000]  All right, Chris, do appreciate the call in. Thanks for the info.
[01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:30.000]  Not a problem. Thanks, sir.
[01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:32.000]  All right. Thank you.
[01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:37.000]  Well, folks, we're about to hit the one minute mark and then the show will be over for this Monday night.
[01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:42.000]  So we're going to go ahead and turn the phones off because we don't have time to talk to anybody else.
[01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:47.000]  However, I would like to say thank you all for listening in and being here tonight.
[01:57:47.000 --> 01:57:52.000]  The few that were here outside of Monday night football at least.
[01:57:52.000 --> 01:57:57.000]  I hope that everything goes well for you the rest of the week, that all your news is good.
[01:57:57.000 --> 01:58:04.000]  All of your blessings are received and all your prayers and hopes are granted in a positive way.
[01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  Everybody, thank you so much for listening. Thank you so much for your support, your communication.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:14.000]  Remember, we do need your financial help. We do need your spiritual help.
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:19.000]  For those of you out there that can't offer either, sit back, listen and learn something.
[01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:23.000]  In the meantime, this has been Rule of Law Radio Monday Night Traffic Show.
[01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  I was your host and we'll be again soon. Eddie Craig, have a good night and God bless you all. Take care.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:05.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:05.000 --> 01:59:09.000]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:12.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:12.000 --> 01:59:21.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:50.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.