ROL_2012-08-03_16k_Hr3-4.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:09.000] What sweet and gooey available at your local supermarket costs about three dollars and
[00:09.000 --> 00:11.000] is known to slash your risk of cancer?
[00:11.000 --> 00:15.000] I'm Dr. Katherine Albright and I'll be back with the answer in a moment.
[00:15.000 --> 00:17.000] Privacy is under attack.
[00:17.000 --> 00:21.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:21.000 --> 00:26.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.000 --> 00:31.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.000 --> 00:34.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.000 --> 00:41.000] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:41.000 --> 00:44.000] Start over with StartPage.
[00:44.000 --> 00:48.000] If you're a jelly junkie, I've got sweet news for you.
[00:48.000 --> 00:54.000] Researchers have found that pectin, the all-natural gel that binds liquid ingredients in jams and jellies,
[00:54.000 --> 00:57.000] slows the growth and spread of cancer.
[00:57.000 --> 01:01.000] Cancer cells form tumors by joining together with gooey receptors.
[01:01.000 --> 01:07.000] Pectin, made from apples and the skins of citrus fruits, binds to those receptors before the bad cells can,
[01:07.000 --> 01:09.000] eventually killing them.
[01:09.000 --> 01:13.000] Some say pectin cures chronic joint pain and prevents arthritis too.
[01:13.000 --> 01:17.000] Though I can't vouch for that, it can't hurt to try this natural remedy.
[01:17.000 --> 01:22.000] Turns out a spoonful of apple pectin a day may actually keep the doctor away.
[01:22.000 --> 01:27.000] Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:36.000 --> 01:40.000] Canada's taken a major step towards eliminating cash.
[01:40.000 --> 01:47.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and in a moment I'll tell you how Canada's government is setting the stage for total purchase tracking next.
[01:47.000 --> 01:49.000] Privacy is under attack.
[01:49.000 --> 01:53.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:53.000 --> 01:58.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:58.000 --> 02:03.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:03.000 --> 02:06.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:06.000 --> 02:13.000] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[02:13.000 --> 02:15.000] Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.000 --> 02:21.000] A penny for your thoughts or how about I just predict them from your digital transaction record?
[02:21.000 --> 02:30.000] Such mind reading may soon be possible in Canada where officials are removing one cent coins from circulation with other coins scheduled to follow.
[02:30.000 --> 02:37.000] The media says Canadians are ready to dump cash and switch to government issued digital cards instead, but not so fast.
[02:37.000 --> 02:45.000] Cash lets people do business without leaving an electronic trail for big marketers and big governments to spy on.
[02:45.000 --> 02:54.000] Once bureaucrats eliminate the sound of coins jingling your pocket, the next sound you hear may be big brothers' jackboots stomping on your right to privacy.
[02:54.000 --> 03:10.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albright for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[03:10.000 --> 03:25.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albright for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[03:25.000 --> 03:41.000] Just like the saying I accepted for value right away, it's not too late or not later. We are originators and the pathway seems to get straighter every day.
[03:41.000 --> 03:57.000] And I can take anything that I love to me to do you.
[03:57.000 --> 04:12.000] And you know, all we've been doing is trying to fight them in their own court and they're pretty much doing whatever they want to.
[04:12.000 --> 04:22.000] And part of the reason I do this show is to try to help people understand the joys of being the pro-safe from hell.
[04:22.000 --> 04:34.000] We need to introduce them to the pro-safe from hell. The nice thing about being pro-safe and a sovereign is we pretty much do anything we want to.
[04:34.000 --> 04:48.000] And since we are counsel in our own case, the other side has to respond to whatever we do, so we think that they're controlling us when really we control them.
[04:48.000 --> 04:53.000] There's nothing they can do but what we don't have something we can do back to them.
[04:53.000 --> 05:10.000] And if we can get an official to act beyond scope and a prosecuting attorney signing the complaint is very definitely beyond scope.
[05:10.000 --> 05:21.000] So the problem you might have had is that in order to get the right answer, you have to ask the right question.
[05:21.000 --> 05:35.000] So instead of asking corrupt appeals courts to do their job, let's go get somebody else. Somebody do anything to do with this and kick them around a little bit.
[05:35.000 --> 05:40.000] Right. Especially if we did the Chief Justice.
[05:40.000 --> 05:46.000] Chief Justice, I have a number of people who are in the process of filing this Chief Justice.
[05:46.000 --> 05:59.000] If we start pounding him with these complaints and then when he doesn't act on them, we start pounding the prosecuting attorney to indict him.
[05:59.000 --> 06:05.000] Yeah. You know, this is all like crabs in a bucket. Right.
[06:05.000 --> 06:11.000] And the higher up you are, the more crabs you got trying to drag him down.
[06:11.000 --> 06:20.000] This Chief Justice is going to get really excited because he sees his next opponent using all this stuff against him.
[06:20.000 --> 06:30.000] And everything's political, but even more important than that. Perception is everything.
[06:30.000 --> 06:43.000] Right. Criminal complaints against the Chief Justice for misfeasants in office, even if they are unfounded, they still create the perception.
[06:43.000 --> 06:44.000] Right.
[06:44.000 --> 07:00.000] And he's going to know it. And I can't think of a better way to bring this to his attention than from a class C misdemeanor.
[07:00.000 --> 07:14.000] The way I have affected courts is I go in there with the most stinking, rotten, miniscule, minor, nitpicking complaint I can find.
[07:14.000 --> 07:15.000] Right.
[07:15.000 --> 07:24.000] And I get him to say, it's gross. If I'm not going to act on this and then bam, land on them like a ton of bricks.
[07:24.000 --> 07:25.000] Right.
[07:25.000 --> 07:48.000] Right. One of my favorite phone conversations with the prosecutor was when the Johnson County Assistant District Attorney Lisa Wyatt, after she had taken my criminal complaints against her boss and sent him to the sheriff, the sheriff sent him back.
[07:48.000 --> 08:02.000] And she had told me to send him the sheriff and I refused. She sent him. Sheriff sent him back. I'm talking to her. She said, Mr. Kelton, I sent you complaints to the sheriff, but he sent the backs and he couldn't do anything with him because there were complaints against him in there.
[08:02.000 --> 08:04.000] I said, he has a matter of fact.
[08:04.000 --> 08:11.000] She said, Mr. Kelton, I get the impression that you planned this this way.
[08:11.000 --> 08:23.000] Well, miss Wyatt, you're very astute. I hope you don't think this is my first rodeo. No, Mr. Kelton, somehow I don't think it is.
[08:23.000 --> 08:49.000] If you, if you can get them to think that you become really, really bad news and they need to know that some of these ordinary citizens with the most minor and miniscule complaint against them is going to kick your behind every week from Sunday.
[08:49.000 --> 09:01.000] Take the highest official in the state and put his career in jeopardy. Just like Ron Earl took out Tom DeLay, second highest political figure in the country.
[09:01.000 --> 09:14.000] Right. Took him out of illegal. It was totally illegal what he did to Ron to Tom DeLay. Right. I'm not saying Tom DeLay wasn't a chump. They deserve it, but the way he got it was illegal.
[09:14.000 --> 09:23.000] It was all political. So let's do that ourselves. Mike will be surprised at how much fun this is.
[09:23.000 --> 09:40.000] That's the scary part. It is so much fun. The first time you get to watch one of these guys do this little chicken dance, it can ruin you for life. You can really get addicted to it.
[09:40.000 --> 09:54.000] Well, I have got my notes and also recorded all of this. So we'll go back through and we'll start again with let me see everything in my file.
[09:54.000 --> 10:10.000] Okay, go back and look at 39.03 penal code. That statute is reflected in 18 U.S. Code 242, the Ku Klux Klan Act.
[10:10.000 --> 10:12.000] Right.
[10:12.000 --> 10:29.000] They both say essentially the same thing. Everyone should have that memorized. It essentially says if a public official does anything he's not supposed to, or if he fails to do what he is supposed to, and denies you're right, that's crime.
[10:29.000 --> 10:44.000] It's kind of a catch-all. Okay, so then we just go in and say, here the law gives you this duty. I don't tell them what the duty is. I say, I want you to do this thing.
[10:44.000 --> 10:52.000] And I've got this law over here that says they're supposed to do that thing. Then they say, well, I don't want to do that. Okay, bam.
[10:52.000 --> 10:53.000] Got it.
[10:53.000 --> 11:00.000] Okay, bam. Okay, this is going to be fun. Okay, we like it. Appreciate it, guys. Okay, thank you, Mike.
[11:00.000 --> 11:01.000] Right.
[11:01.000 --> 11:07.000] Now we're going to go to Johnny in Tejas.
[11:07.000 --> 11:08.000] Hey, guys.
[11:08.000 --> 11:11.000] Hello, Johnny. What do you have for us today?
[11:11.000 --> 11:26.000] Well, I just have a quick question, but I want to speak to first to comment, Brandy, that you made to a caller earlier in the show regarding getting a court clerk to put in writing that there's nothing in the case file.
[11:26.000 --> 11:38.000] They won't do that here. So if anyone faces that, generally what we do is just go to the court the day before and ask for whatever is in the case file.
[11:38.000 --> 11:42.000] Let the clerk come back and say nothing's in there and then ask for the clerk.
[11:42.000 --> 11:47.000] Okay, the point is, ask in writing.
[11:47.000 --> 11:53.000] Oh, okay. I misunderstood what you said, then I thought you were saying get the clerk to put in writing that there's nothing in the case file.
[11:53.000 --> 12:02.000] Okay, the clerk, if you ask in writing and you get no response, well, that's a crime.
[12:02.000 --> 12:03.000] Yeah.
[12:03.000 --> 12:09.000] That denies you to public court. So she'll either give you a response.
[12:09.000 --> 12:15.000] And when you give it to her, she's going to try to talk to you about it.
[12:15.000 --> 12:20.000] You said, no, no, I gave you my request in writing.
[12:20.000 --> 12:22.000] I want your response in writing.
[12:22.000 --> 12:25.000] And what I thought of doing I hadn't done it yet.
[12:25.000 --> 12:29.000] I just kind of thought I should do this recently is under my signature.
[12:29.000 --> 12:34.000] I put a line, check this box.
[12:34.000 --> 12:43.000] If you have no records responsive to my request and ask them, just check that box and make me a copy and return it to me.
[12:43.000 --> 12:44.000] Interesting.
[12:44.000 --> 12:57.000] One caveat for JP courts and municipal courts, when you go and make a serious request for records,
[12:57.000 --> 13:02.000] they're going to say, well, we have 10 days to respond.
[13:02.000 --> 13:07.000] Not right.
[13:07.000 --> 13:12.000] County court and the district court has 10 days to respond.
[13:12.000 --> 13:16.000] But not the municipal court of JP court.
[13:16.000 --> 13:26.000] Write this down. Government code 27.004.
[13:26.000 --> 13:37.000] 27004 says the court shall keep all records open for public inspection by all interested parties at all reasonable times.
[13:37.000 --> 13:44.000] And this was referring to the JP courts, which apply to the municipal courts equally.
[13:44.000 --> 13:56.000] While the courts have issued rules that says they can request, they can ask for a written request and take up to 10 days to respond.
[13:56.000 --> 13:58.000] That is only a rule.
[13:58.000 --> 13:59.000] Right.
[13:59.000 --> 14:15.000] It only applies to county and district as there is a special statute specifically written by the legislature to address the justice in the courts.
[14:15.000 --> 14:21.000] I have the last time I used this was in Waco when the clerk wouldn't give me the documents.
[14:21.000 --> 14:22.000] I said, wait right here.
[14:22.000 --> 14:23.000] Don't go anywhere.
[14:23.000 --> 14:29.000] Where somebody's going to talk to you and walked out round to where the little metal detector was.
[14:29.000 --> 14:31.000] I pointed at this female sergeant.
[14:31.000 --> 14:32.000] You come with me.
[14:32.000 --> 14:33.000] I need you.
[14:33.000 --> 14:36.000] And I turned around and walked off.
[14:36.000 --> 14:41.000] The guys with me said she stood there kind of stunned for a minute.
[14:41.000 --> 14:43.000] She couldn't believe somebody's just done that.
[14:43.000 --> 14:46.000] You know, I'm in a suit tie, so she don't know who I am.
[14:46.000 --> 14:48.000] And finally she comes on.
[14:48.000 --> 14:49.000] What can I do for you?
[14:49.000 --> 14:51.000] And I turned and said, watch this.
[14:51.000 --> 14:54.000] And I turned to the clerk, I want you to give me those records I asked for.
[14:54.000 --> 14:57.000] I told her you'll have to give us a written request.
[14:57.000 --> 14:58.000] I turned to the sergeant.
[14:58.000 --> 14:59.000] Did you hear that?
[14:59.000 --> 15:01.000] She said, yes, I did.
[15:01.000 --> 15:03.000] Arrest her.
[15:03.000 --> 15:05.000] Well, why would I arrest her?
[15:05.000 --> 15:09.000] For violating 27004 government code.
[15:09.000 --> 15:16.000] And she said, well, Mr. Calston, I don't have 27004 government code.
[15:16.000 --> 15:17.000] No problem.
[15:17.000 --> 15:18.000] Open my briefcase.
[15:18.000 --> 15:20.000] Let me help you out with that.
[15:20.000 --> 15:21.000] There.
[15:21.000 --> 15:24.000] Read and weep.
[15:24.000 --> 15:25.000] She read it.
[15:25.000 --> 15:27.000] She called her lieutenant, her captain.
[15:27.000 --> 15:29.000] I had a whole room full.
[15:29.000 --> 15:32.000] And they're all trying to reason with me.
[15:32.000 --> 15:35.000] Well, I'm just being down right up.
[15:35.000 --> 15:38.000] Don't give me all this nonsense.
[15:38.000 --> 15:39.000] Do your job.
[15:39.000 --> 15:40.000] Go arrest her.
[15:40.000 --> 15:41.000] Just a weekend arrest her.
[15:41.000 --> 15:45.000] She can't just just go back to her cover and drag her off to jail.
[15:45.000 --> 15:47.000] It's a piece of cake.
[15:47.000 --> 15:53.000] And they knew I am just having myself a ball.
[15:53.000 --> 15:57.000] And they're shifting back and forth one foot to the other.
[15:57.000 --> 16:02.000] And the only smart person in the building was the JP.
[16:02.000 --> 16:05.000] She come out about half grinning.
[16:05.000 --> 16:10.000] She said, Mr. Calston, we step into my office for a moment.
[16:10.000 --> 16:11.000] Sure.
[16:11.000 --> 16:14.000] And I had somebody with me.
[16:14.000 --> 16:17.000] Yes, I'd like to bring them with me if you don't mind.
[16:17.000 --> 16:19.000] Oh, I don't mind.
[16:19.000 --> 16:23.000] That tells me she wasn't going to try to do something stupid.
[16:23.000 --> 16:24.000] That's fine.
[16:24.000 --> 16:28.000] She said, Mr. Calston, do you mind if I ask what you're doing out there?
[16:28.000 --> 16:33.000] Oh, I was just giving you a quick and object lesson.
[16:33.000 --> 16:35.000] She said, that's what I thought.
[16:35.000 --> 16:38.000] I will instruct her to give me the records if you want.
[16:38.000 --> 16:40.000] And I didn't pursue.
[16:40.000 --> 16:44.000] But I can almost shoot them.
[16:44.000 --> 16:48.000] This clerk is never going to pull that crap over again.
[16:48.000 --> 16:50.000] Somebody asked her for records.
[16:50.000 --> 16:52.000] They're going to get them out of the argument.
[16:52.000 --> 16:53.000] This is Randy Calston.
[16:53.000 --> 16:54.000] Steve's Eddie Craig.
[16:54.000 --> 16:56.000] We'll go radio.
[16:56.000 --> 16:57.000] We'll be right back.
[16:57.000 --> 16:58.000] Hang on, Johnny.
[16:58.000 --> 17:01.000] We'll pick you up on this.
[17:01.000 --> 17:05.000] At Capital Coin in Berlin, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[17:05.000 --> 17:09.000] by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[17:09.000 --> 17:13.000] Capital Coin features a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals.
[17:13.000 --> 17:16.000] In addition to providing the best prices in the nation,
[17:16.000 --> 17:20.000] we want to bring you the best shopping experience both in-store and online.
[17:20.000 --> 17:24.000] In addition to coins and bullion, we carry popular young Jeopardy products
[17:24.000 --> 17:27.000] such as Beyond Tany Tangerine and Pollen Boost.
[17:27.000 --> 17:30.000] We offer freeze-dried, storeable foods by Augustin Farms,
[17:30.000 --> 17:34.000] Bergy Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[17:34.000 --> 17:39.000] You can lock in a spot price with our Silverpool, and we set up Metal's IRA accounts.
[17:39.000 --> 17:43.000] Call us at 512-646-6400 for more details.
[17:43.000 --> 17:48.000] We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half a mile south of Anderson.
[17:48.000 --> 17:52.000] We're open Monday through Friday 10-6, Saturday 10-2.
[17:52.000 --> 18:00.000] Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6400.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirrors Proven Method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:13.000] Michael Mirrors has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors,
[18:13.000 --> 18:15.000] and now you can win two.
[18:15.000 --> 18:19.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court
[18:19.000 --> 18:21.000] using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:25.000] What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons?
[18:25.000 --> 18:27.000] How to answer letters and phone calls?
[18:27.000 --> 18:29.000] How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports?
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000] The Michael Mirrors Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:47.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirrors banner,
[18:47.000 --> 18:50.000] or email Michaelmirrors at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 18:57.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.000 --> 19:00.000] To learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:27.000 --> 19:37.000] Okay, we are back.
[19:37.000 --> 19:44.000] And Johnny, I did need to kind of run all over you there.
[19:44.000 --> 19:50.000] Sometimes I get wound up and I run on a little bit.
[19:50.000 --> 19:52.000] Don't believe that he did.
[19:52.000 --> 19:54.000] He always does that.
[19:54.000 --> 19:57.000] That's why I don't take Randy hiking.
[19:57.000 --> 20:04.000] He'll meander off the trail and we'll spend the entire day looking for where his carcass landed.
[20:04.000 --> 20:09.000] Well, from what you've been saying, it would leave a big mark.
[20:09.000 --> 20:13.000] Well, it'd leave a big smell, that for sure.
[20:13.000 --> 20:16.000] Okay, Johnny, where were we?
[20:16.000 --> 20:23.000] We were talking about going after them criminally, but where are you at?
[20:23.000 --> 20:25.000] Back up to be kind of lost by place.
[20:25.000 --> 20:33.000] Well, I just, I called in with an initial question, but I was first commenting on the discussion that you had with a previous caller.
[20:33.000 --> 20:40.000] It's interesting here in the municipal court, when you go in and you ask them for a copy of everything that's in the case file,
[20:40.000 --> 20:43.000] they literally look at you bewildered.
[20:43.000 --> 20:52.000] And, you know, they'll, with a very confused tone, will say, well, the traffic ticket's the only thing in the case file.
[20:52.000 --> 20:59.000] And generally, what we'll do is go in like a day before a hearing and ask for it, get them to state that, put it in an affidavit,
[20:59.000 --> 21:03.000] and then the next morning, right before the hearing, file that affidavit.
[21:03.000 --> 21:10.000] And they've never pushed back on, you know, the affidavit itself, saying that, you know, no validity threat was anything like that.
[21:10.000 --> 21:18.000] So that's how we generally will prove that, you know, we came in and we asked for a copy of everything in the case file.
[21:18.000 --> 21:23.000] We told that there was, you know, nothing of any validity in it.
[21:23.000 --> 21:27.000] So we really have nothing to go on, don't understand the nature causes of the charges, so on and so forth.
[21:27.000 --> 21:37.000] And recently, based on what Eddie's been saying, he brought to my attention that, you know, they have to, unless you waive it,
[21:37.000 --> 21:46.000] they have to present you with a sworn complainer information at least one day before the day of any proceeding.
[21:46.000 --> 21:54.000] So just for anybody, you know, that's wanting to deal with the situation, particularly the last caller,
[21:54.000 --> 21:57.000] I mean, you can just go in a day before and say, give me a copy of everything in there,
[21:57.000 --> 22:03.000] and they'll say there's nothing but that in an affidavit, go in right before your hearing and file that.
[22:03.000 --> 22:08.000] It is interesting, though, that the clerks here, or the cashiers here, I should call them.
[22:08.000 --> 22:13.000] When you go and ask, you know, are you a clerk of the court, they'll say, oh, we all are.
[22:13.000 --> 22:18.000] Great, I need to file this into the case file, I need to file stamp copy back.
[22:18.000 --> 22:21.000] Okay, well, let me take this to the clerk.
[22:21.000 --> 22:25.000] Now, wait a minute, you just said you're all clerks, which is kind of interesting.
[22:25.000 --> 22:29.000] I haven't really forced the issue, but it's interesting that they claim that they are all clerks
[22:29.000 --> 22:32.000] until you need to file something, then they have to go find a clerk.
[22:32.000 --> 22:39.000] Well, they have to, yeah, they have to find the clerk who knows what's going on.
[22:39.000 --> 22:50.000] I am going to suggest, and I know this is not as much fun, but that you do everything in writing.
[22:50.000 --> 22:56.000] Anything you ask for, just hand it to them.
[22:56.000 --> 23:06.000] Then, you know, they ask them to just initial this and give me a copy back to show that I filed this on this day.
[23:06.000 --> 23:12.000] And I suggest that any information request that you filed with the clerk's office,
[23:12.000 --> 23:21.000] if it is in a JP's office or a municipal court, since the clerk is an employee,
[23:21.000 --> 23:29.000] in the true sense in that it's not in the lifted clerk, he works at the pleasure of the court
[23:29.000 --> 23:37.000] that you put the request in the name of the chief judge of the court.
[23:37.000 --> 23:38.000] Okay.
[23:38.000 --> 23:43.000] Because you will presume that he is the custodian of the record,
[23:43.000 --> 23:47.000] and even if he has appointed a custodian of the record,
[23:47.000 --> 23:56.000] he is responding yet superior for every employee in the municipal court.
[23:56.000 --> 23:59.000] So always you make your request to the custodian of the record,
[23:59.000 --> 24:05.000] and that's always the director of an agency or a designee,
[24:05.000 --> 24:13.000] in which case the designee is responsible for the designee, if that makes any sense.
[24:13.000 --> 24:16.000] Anyway, you do that in writing.
[24:16.000 --> 24:20.000] Well, here, they will not, they absolutely, if you ask them to sign anything,
[24:20.000 --> 24:24.000] initial anything, give you anything back as any kind of proof,
[24:24.000 --> 24:26.000] they absolutely will refuse to do it.
[24:26.000 --> 24:28.000] And if you ask for the...
[24:28.000 --> 24:30.000] This is what I suggest.
[24:30.000 --> 24:34.000] You can have so much fun with this.
[24:34.000 --> 24:39.000] Tell them that, you know, you've had a problem with your hearing.
[24:39.000 --> 24:41.000] I don't hear too well.
[24:41.000 --> 24:49.000] Will you say that again and look and speak clearly into my pen, please?
[24:49.000 --> 24:53.000] It's fair warning.
[24:53.000 --> 24:55.000] I'm going to try that.
[24:55.000 --> 24:59.000] Yeah, I did that to the sheriff, and he looked down,
[24:59.000 --> 25:03.000] and I just had a regular pen in my pocket.
[25:03.000 --> 25:06.000] He said, oh, you're a real funny guy.
[25:06.000 --> 25:12.000] He didn't look in the other pocket, I had a digital recorder in that one.
[25:12.000 --> 25:16.000] But you know, make this real for them.
[25:16.000 --> 25:24.000] If you seem as though you expect them to do exactly what they do,
[25:24.000 --> 25:28.000] they are extremely intimidated by that.
[25:28.000 --> 25:30.000] Yeah, I found that out.
[25:30.000 --> 25:33.000] That is exactly what we want.
[25:33.000 --> 25:39.000] We want to be nice, professional, and scared of Capola out of them,
[25:39.000 --> 25:47.000] so that they're going to worry more about what we might do than what we actually will do.
[25:47.000 --> 25:51.000] And it tends to get them to either act really, really smart,
[25:51.000 --> 25:55.000] or they tend to act really, really stupid.
[25:55.000 --> 26:00.000] And either one works in our favor.
[26:00.000 --> 26:03.000] But anyway, yeah, anything you want from the court,
[26:03.000 --> 26:08.000] I would always suggest that you write it up before you get there.
[26:08.000 --> 26:16.000] As far as information requests, you might look on JurisImprudence.com
[26:16.000 --> 26:19.000] under documents and research and blanks.
[26:19.000 --> 26:21.000] I've got a whole bunch of blanks.
[26:21.000 --> 26:23.000] I've got some blank information requests.
[26:23.000 --> 26:29.000] You might look at one in particular, Scoped Content.
[26:29.000 --> 26:35.000] Scoped Content is the one I pull out when I ask them for records,
[26:35.000 --> 26:41.000] and they do a song and dance, and they're extemporaneous,
[26:41.000 --> 26:46.000] or they try to obfuscate the nature of their records.
[26:46.000 --> 26:50.000] They won't tell me what I need to know to make a specific request.
[26:50.000 --> 26:53.000] I just give them Scoped Content.
[26:53.000 --> 26:58.000] Scoped Content is taken right out of the code.
[26:58.000 --> 27:03.000] The section of the Open Records Act that designates
[27:03.000 --> 27:09.000] by statute what records are open for public inspection.
[27:09.000 --> 27:14.000] It's a whole list of, it's a page and a half.
[27:14.000 --> 27:18.000] And I have given this to District Attorney's Office,
[27:18.000 --> 27:20.000] and the prosecutor came back and said,
[27:20.000 --> 27:22.000] Mr. Kelton, I've read your request,
[27:22.000 --> 27:25.000] and I don't know what you're asking for.
[27:25.000 --> 27:30.000] You want to explain to me what you're asking for?
[27:30.000 --> 27:34.000] Don't ask me. Ask the legislature.
[27:34.000 --> 27:39.000] They wrote it. I didn't. I just copied it.
[27:39.000 --> 27:45.000] And you could see in his eyes, he knew exactly what I was saying.
[27:45.000 --> 27:48.000] He copied that right out of the Open Records Act.
[27:48.000 --> 27:50.000] Yeah, as a matter of fact, I did.
[27:50.000 --> 27:53.000] And it said, these records are made open for public inspection,
[27:53.000 --> 27:56.000] so show up to me.
[27:56.000 --> 28:01.000] I once had a sheriff's captain spend eight hours with me
[28:01.000 --> 28:05.000] going over every record they kept, what they called it,
[28:05.000 --> 28:07.000] where they kept it, how they kept it,
[28:07.000 --> 28:09.000] what protocols they kept it in,
[28:09.000 --> 28:13.000] what names I could use to ask for those specific records,
[28:13.000 --> 28:15.000] all day going through.
[28:15.000 --> 28:17.000] Wow.
[28:17.000 --> 28:20.000] So if there, give me any difficulty at all,
[28:20.000 --> 28:23.000] I just give them the Scoped Content.
[28:23.000 --> 28:26.000] And then I'll get, you will get a,
[28:26.000 --> 28:31.000] most likely get a request to the Attorney General for an opinion.
[28:31.000 --> 28:35.000] That gets a criminal complaint.
[28:35.000 --> 28:41.000] The Attorney General has no power to have an opinion about records
[28:41.000 --> 28:44.000] being open for public inspection,
[28:44.000 --> 28:48.000] that the legislature has specifically stipulated
[28:48.000 --> 28:52.000] are open for public inspection.
[28:52.000 --> 28:58.000] Or if you request records and the department makes a request
[28:58.000 --> 29:04.000] and there is already a prior adjudication,
[29:04.000 --> 29:08.000] if the department makes a request for open records
[29:08.000 --> 29:13.000] and the Attorney General issues a letter of opinion,
[29:13.000 --> 29:16.000] they will issue a letter of opinion
[29:16.000 --> 29:19.000] when they're referencing prior adjudications.
[29:19.000 --> 29:22.000] In that case, you file a criminal charge
[29:22.000 --> 29:25.000] against the custodian,
[29:25.000 --> 29:31.000] claim that their request to the Attorney General was frivolous
[29:31.000 --> 29:34.000] and was for the purpose of delay for delaying sake.
[29:34.000 --> 29:38.000] That is a class that used to be in Texas.
[29:38.000 --> 29:42.000] Okay, this is Redcliff, David Stevens and Craig,
[29:42.000 --> 29:45.000] we've got radio and I know I've kind of taken a long time
[29:45.000 --> 29:49.000] to get on this. Johnny, we'll finish up on the other side
[29:49.000 --> 29:51.000] and we'll go to Johann and Julius.
[29:51.000 --> 29:53.000] Thank you guys for holding on.
[29:53.000 --> 29:57.000] Call in number 512-646-1984.
[29:57.000 --> 30:00.000] We'll be right back.
[30:00.000 --> 30:03.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper
[30:03.000 --> 30:06.000] that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[30:06.000 --> 30:08.000] The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:08.000 --> 30:11.000] However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded
[30:11.000 --> 30:13.000] it was a controlled demolition.
[30:13.000 --> 30:16.000] 1,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:16.000 --> 30:18.000] 1,000 of my fellow force responders have died.
[30:18.000 --> 30:20.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:20.000 --> 30:21.000] I'm a structural engineer.
[30:21.000 --> 30:22.000] I'm a New York City correctional.
[30:22.000 --> 30:23.000] I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:23.000 --> 30:25.000] I'm the father who lost his son.
[30:25.000 --> 30:27.000] We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[30:27.000 --> 30:31.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:31.000 --> 30:35.000] MPUSA.org has moved and expanded its operations
[30:35.000 --> 30:37.000] for faster worldwide shipping.
[30:37.000 --> 30:41.000] Our product line has grown from 5 to nearly 100 items
[30:41.000 --> 30:43.000] in 5 years.
[30:43.000 --> 30:45.000] Our food has grown naturally, always chemical free,
[30:45.000 --> 30:47.000] not found in stores.
[30:47.000 --> 30:51.000] Great for daily intake and perfect for your emergency storage shelter.
[30:51.000 --> 30:57.000] Call 908-6912608 or visit MPUSA.org
[30:57.000 --> 31:01.000] and see what our powders, seeds and oil can do for you.
[31:01.000 --> 31:04.000] It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM,
[31:04.000 --> 31:07.000] but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy
[31:07.000 --> 31:10.000] and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[31:10.000 --> 31:12.000] Well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[31:12.000 --> 31:14.000] Brave New Books?
[31:14.000 --> 31:17.000] Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for
[31:17.000 --> 31:21.000] by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul and G. Edward Griffin.
[31:21.000 --> 31:25.000] They even stock inner food, Burkey products and Calvin Soaps.
[31:25.000 --> 31:27.000] There's no way a place like that exists.
[31:27.000 --> 31:29.000] Go check it out for yourself.
[31:29.000 --> 31:33.000] It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street just south of UT.
[31:33.000 --> 31:36.000] Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[31:36.000 --> 31:40.000] Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers
[31:40.000 --> 31:44.000] at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[31:44.000 --> 31:47.000] It does exist, but when are they open?
[31:47.000 --> 31:52.000] Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[31:52.000 --> 31:56.000] So give them a call at 512-480-2503
[31:56.000 --> 32:08.000] or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com
[32:26.000 --> 32:39.000] Oh, I won't, I won't let you pull the wool over my eyes
[32:39.000 --> 32:46.000] You must refuse your noose, also come in line
[32:46.000 --> 32:54.000] It seems you like a space, but please take some words to the wise
[32:54.000 --> 33:04.000] Stop trying to pull the wool over my eyes
[33:04.000 --> 33:06.000] Okay, we are back.
[33:06.000 --> 33:12.000] Randy Kelk from Devil's Team did a great video talking to Johnny in Texas.
[33:12.000 --> 33:15.000] Johnny, do you have any...
[33:15.000 --> 33:19.000] I'm gonna get off of that subject, I think I beat it to death.
[33:19.000 --> 33:21.000] Do you have any other...
[33:21.000 --> 33:26.000] I jumped in before you had a question, you had a question, I think you could too.
[33:26.000 --> 33:29.000] Well, that's okay, I just wanted to...
[33:29.000 --> 33:34.000] I'm thinking around a few ideas and I wanted to get some input from you guys
[33:34.000 --> 33:42.000] as to the best course of action to handle what I call the courts holding cards over your head
[33:42.000 --> 33:50.000] and what I mean by that is I've been helping someone who had a stack of old cases
[33:50.000 --> 33:56.000] most of them traffic related or just, you know, spacing misdemeanor fines
[33:56.000 --> 34:01.000] and we've managed to so far get pretty much all of them dismissed
[34:01.000 --> 34:05.000] we just went to court again a couple of days ago and got some more cases dismissed
[34:05.000 --> 34:09.000] but the way they work things here is they'll have you come in
[34:09.000 --> 34:18.000] and they'll try to get you to plea to, you know, three or four or five different charges
[34:18.000 --> 34:26.000] and then they'll want to set a hearing for each charge to keep you coming back, coming back, coming back
[34:26.000 --> 34:31.000] and just when you think that you've got everything dealt with, they'll come up with, you know,
[34:31.000 --> 34:35.000] something that you've forgotten about, for example, as I said, we went to court a couple of days ago
[34:35.000 --> 34:38.000] we got a couple of charges dismissed
[34:38.000 --> 34:42.000] and then just a few days later we get a setting notice
[34:42.000 --> 34:50.000] for a $365 fine for a trash can being left out on the wrong day from like four or five years ago
[34:50.000 --> 34:58.000] so what they're doing is I'm convinced that they know that they are not going to win any of these cases
[34:58.000 --> 35:04.000] so far we've gotten them all dismissed, we've got 23 somewhat charges dismissed so far
[35:04.000 --> 35:10.000] so I think what they're doing, I'm convinced what they're doing is they realize they're not going to get any convictions
[35:10.000 --> 35:14.000] on any of these cases so what they're doing is they're just holding these charges
[35:14.000 --> 35:21.000] and just, you know, dissing them out one at a time to keep us having to come back, come back, come back, come back, come back
[35:21.000 --> 35:28.000] File a malicious prosecution suit against the municipality
[35:28.000 --> 35:29.000] Okay
[35:29.000 --> 35:40.000] sue the mayor personally, respondent superior for felony retaliation because you exercise your rights
[35:40.000 --> 35:51.000] to seek proper adjudication of the case, they have retaliated by multiple and repeated false accusations
[35:51.000 --> 35:57.000] and malicious prosecutions at the expense of the taxpayer and ask the mayor to pay it all back
[35:57.000 --> 35:59.000] Okay
[35:59.000 --> 36:01.000] You're not going to win that case
[36:01.000 --> 36:04.000] Right, right, that would be hard to prove and that would probably be one wherein
[36:04.000 --> 36:05.000] Who cares
[36:05.000 --> 36:11.000] I'm going to have to run the routine on them because they're not going to, you know, they're not going to win the charge
[36:11.000 --> 36:18.000] but it's just, it's really, it's starting to get really aggravating because, you know, we went in, we got these charges dismissed
[36:18.000 --> 36:25.000] and, you know, it's like they wait for us to go in and get charges dismissed to send us the next setting notice on the next charge
[36:25.000 --> 36:30.000] and this is from a, from leaving a trash can out on the wrong day from five years ago, $360
[36:30.000 --> 36:34.000] That is, that's unenforceable and they will know it
[36:34.000 --> 36:38.000] So that should give a, that's the kind of thing you want to bring to a grand jury
[36:38.000 --> 36:40.000] Okay
[36:40.000 --> 36:44.000] Run that routine on the mayor
[36:44.000 --> 36:49.000] Well, as far as the notice itself and the hearing, I mean, that won't be a difficult case to fight
[36:49.000 --> 36:55.000] and it's interesting in the notice, they tell you the above case is set for trial
[36:55.000 --> 37:00.000] and then the very next paragraph is you may plead guilty or no contest in here all the different ways you can plead
[37:00.000 --> 37:04.000] So they're basically admitting that they've scheduled a trial without any plea being entered
[37:04.000 --> 37:09.000] So, I mean, we, you know, we can fight them on those grounds and a whole bunch of other grounds
[37:09.000 --> 37:14.000] It's just getting really aggravating that they're withholding things
[37:14.000 --> 37:19.000] In that case, you know, here's the next one from two or three or four or five years ago
[37:23.000 --> 37:25.000] Did I lose you guys?
[37:25.000 --> 37:27.000] Wait a minute
[37:27.000 --> 37:33.000] How do you know there's no verified complaint?
[37:33.000 --> 37:35.000] Well, there never is
[37:35.000 --> 37:40.000] What was that?
[37:43.000 --> 37:45.000] There's a white error there
[37:45.000 --> 37:49.000] Okay, uh, yeah, but we don't know that or that's a whole separate thing
[37:49.000 --> 37:52.000] We don't know if they have a verified complaint or not
[37:52.000 --> 37:58.000] Well, they never do and that's why, you know, usually what we'll do as I was saying earlier
[37:58.000 --> 38:01.000] We'll, you know, like Eddie was saying, you don't want to ask for it
[38:01.000 --> 38:04.000] You don't want to, you don't want to reveal your hand
[38:04.000 --> 38:11.000] See, this is the case where the, the trial was set for a time when the individual's not going to be able to make it
[38:11.000 --> 38:14.000] She has to be out of town for her job and she has no choice about it
[38:14.000 --> 38:19.000] So we're going to have to, you know, fax something to the court, asking them to reset it
[38:19.000 --> 38:27.000] Um, you know, and then go in on the day of the hearing and say, look, we, you know, we have no clue what this is about
[38:27.000 --> 38:29.000] We haven't seen a complaint
[38:29.000 --> 38:32.000] Wait a minute, wait a minute, this is a trash can
[38:32.000 --> 38:38.000] Is that a, is this a municipal ordinance?
[38:38.000 --> 38:39.000] Yes
[38:39.000 --> 38:41.000] Eddie, Eddie, is this civil?
[38:41.000 --> 38:43.000] It is civil
[38:43.000 --> 38:44.000] Yeah
[38:44.000 --> 38:45.000] Okay, this is civil
[38:45.000 --> 38:46.000] Another thing
[38:46.000 --> 39:01.000] Why don't you look at filing a suit against them for breaching the process, malicious prosecution, and filing it in the federal court
[39:01.000 --> 39:06.000] And remove this trash can suit to the federal court
[39:06.000 --> 39:09.000] And this trash can action
[39:09.000 --> 39:11.000] Okay
[39:15.000 --> 39:20.000] You can, you, the federal court's different than the Trump courts
[39:20.000 --> 39:27.000] And if you choose these, the city of a pattern of abuse
[39:27.000 --> 39:34.000] And take them to the federal courts, you can keep them in the federal courts for a long time
[39:34.000 --> 39:43.000] Well, you could almost certainly get all of the proceedings of a municipal civil nature abated
[39:43.000 --> 39:49.000] Well, most, most likely, you sue them in the federal court, this is going to go away, they're going to make it all go away
[39:49.000 --> 39:56.000] Well, I'm sure they will, but the thing is, they, they handle it like everything else, they handle it like a traffic ticket
[39:56.000 --> 40:03.000] I mean, we all know that it's civil, but they call it criminal, and they want to handle it under the rules of criminal procedure, you know, and there is no crime
[40:03.000 --> 40:08.000] So, trying to get something like this removed from the municipal court federal court
[40:08.000 --> 40:12.000] No, no, wait, no, you don't understand, anything that works
[40:12.000 --> 40:15.000] You don't try to get it removed
[40:15.000 --> 40:17.000] You just go file a suit
[40:17.000 --> 40:21.000] You have the power to remove
[40:21.000 --> 40:25.000] When you find a notice of removal, you're not saying, I want to remove this
[40:25.000 --> 40:30.000] We have a judge in Colorado that denied removal
[40:30.000 --> 40:40.000] And he went ahead, she granted the people, she was real nice, and said, you guys really want a continuance, don't you?
[40:40.000 --> 40:44.000] And they said, well, sure we do, so you granted them a continuance
[40:44.000 --> 40:49.000] So they didn't want to go after her, she denied a removal
[40:49.000 --> 40:52.000] You can't do that
[40:52.000 --> 41:01.000] No, so wait a minute, you can remove a case that they are calling criminal from a municipal court to federal court
[41:01.000 --> 41:08.000] If you're saying that it's a municipal and it's not, does it have a...
[41:08.000 --> 41:10.000] Let them argue that
[41:10.000 --> 41:16.000] Making all kinds of threats, it's saying that the trial's been scheduled, and if you don't show up, a warrant's going to be issued and everything else
[41:16.000 --> 41:19.000] So they're handling it as if it is a criminal matter
[41:19.000 --> 41:28.000] Okay, if you can show that the process used by the state is violative of a protected right at the federal level
[41:28.000 --> 41:38.000] And there is no relief forthcoming at the state level, then you have the right of removal to achieve remedy
[41:38.000 --> 41:51.000] Well, no, it goes to a claim, if you have a federal claim, if you have an accusation of the violation of a federally protected right
[41:51.000 --> 42:01.000] And the equal protection of the laws, due process, federal due process, then you can make a claim in the federal court
[42:01.000 --> 42:05.000] Once the claim is in the federal court, you can remove
[42:05.000 --> 42:16.000] Now, the federal court can remand, but you can certainly remove, and it stops once this hearing is coming up, then it's stopped
[42:16.000 --> 42:17.000] Period
[42:17.000 --> 42:18.000] Okay
[42:18.000 --> 42:24.000] Even if it's criminal, it doesn't matter what it is, when you file the removal, it is removed
[42:24.000 --> 42:29.000] Now, the federal judge may get it, let me, the controlling case
[42:29.000 --> 42:37.000] Black guy, South Carolina, goes into white bars, gets in fight with the white guy, kills the white guy
[42:37.000 --> 42:47.000] He's prosecuted, they got the jury impaneled, the day before trial, he files a removal
[42:47.000 --> 42:53.000] The judge says, we already have the panel in place, we're going to move ahead, they move ahead
[42:53.000 --> 42:57.000] The fed got the removal
[42:57.000 --> 43:05.000] Three days later, ruled, you have no grounds whatsoever for removal, they remanded it back
[43:05.000 --> 43:12.000] The trial proceeded, he was found guilty, he appealed, appeals court threw it out
[43:12.000 --> 43:20.000] Said, once that removal was filed, stated, jurisdiction ceased
[43:20.000 --> 43:30.000] And pre-cost the court moved ahead and didn't abate all proceedings, had they waited the three days and then continued, they'd have been fine
[43:30.000 --> 43:37.000] But when the judge took that first step after your notice of removal, it was over
[43:37.000 --> 43:39.000] What case was that?
[43:39.000 --> 43:43.000] I don't have it in my head if I have to figure it out about the time
[43:43.000 --> 43:54.000] This is Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig, Lula Radio, calling number is 512-646-1984, Julius, Johann and Julius
[43:54.000 --> 44:14.000] Eric, Robert, I see you, be careful here on the side, we'll be right back
[44:25.000 --> 44:34.000] And now you can too, Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience
[44:34.000 --> 44:43.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts
[44:43.000 --> 44:52.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more
[44:52.000 --> 45:01.000] Please visit LulavLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ
[45:01.000 --> 45:09.000] The Oklahoma City bombing, Top 10 reasons to question the official story, reason number one, John Doe number two and other accomplices
[45:09.000 --> 45:17.000] On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the Ryder truck report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators
[45:17.000 --> 45:25.000] The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone delivered the Ryder truck bomb to the Murra building and detonated it
[45:25.000 --> 45:33.000] The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley, who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing
[45:33.000 --> 45:39.000] Testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fable John Doe number two, exiting the Ryder truck
[45:39.000 --> 45:50.000] While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing, no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing
[45:50.000 --> 45:57.000] Including when he rented the Ryder truck and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators
[45:57.000 --> 46:12.000] For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com
[46:27.000 --> 46:29.000] What I'm Wishing for
[46:29.000 --> 46:35.000] When I'm hungry, I like to know just what I'm fishing for
[46:35.000 --> 46:40.000] I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton
[46:40.000 --> 46:45.000] I'm just here making my living, pushing buttons
[46:45.000 --> 46:52.000] I give my message out to anyone who's shouting distance
[46:52.000 --> 46:58.000] I hope for bravery and against slavery, showing resistance
[46:58.000 --> 47:03.000] First I'm crawling, then I'm walking, then I start strutting
[47:03.000 --> 47:08.000] I'm just so glad to make my living, pushing buttons
[47:08.000 --> 47:26.000] 50 competitions
[47:26.000 --> 47:35.000] Alright folks, we are back. Randy, Johnny dropped off. Uh he did something that asked me to drop off, hope we can take the next car
[47:35.000 --> 47:35.000] Alright
[47:35.000 --> 47:36.000] Yeah
[47:36.000 --> 47:37.160] I think he has trust.
[47:37.160 --> 47:38.000] Yeah.
[47:38.000 --> 47:40.240] All right, let's go to Johann in Texas.
[47:40.240 --> 47:43.960] Johann, Roberto, George, whatever you want to be today,
[47:43.960 --> 47:44.800] go ahead.
[47:46.080 --> 47:48.920] All right, what I got should be more interesting
[47:48.920 --> 47:52.560] than the trash can, but a little bit more filthy.
[47:54.920 --> 47:59.160] I'm currently having someone working on my 11.07 appeal.
[48:00.360 --> 48:02.840] I was convicted for an alleged sexual assault
[48:02.840 --> 48:05.920] involving a female that was a minor.
[48:05.920 --> 48:08.720] I was sentenced to 10 years in prison.
[48:08.720 --> 48:12.080] I'm now out on parole after five years.
[48:13.000 --> 48:17.200] I'm having someone work on the 11.07, like I said.
[48:17.200 --> 48:19.080] The public defender who was my attorney
[48:19.080 --> 48:22.160] when I was convicted threatened me before
[48:22.160 --> 48:25.200] I took the plea bargain of 10 years
[48:25.200 --> 48:28.520] by telling me I was going to be raped in prison
[48:28.520 --> 48:30.760] and passed around like a peace pipe.
[48:31.680 --> 48:34.880] I told the judge during a motion to withdraw
[48:34.880 --> 48:37.560] in which the public defender filed
[48:37.560 --> 48:41.280] that the public defender told me I was going to get raped.
[48:41.280 --> 48:44.000] I told the judge I wanted a new attorney,
[48:44.000 --> 48:46.160] but the judge refused.
[48:46.160 --> 48:49.200] Now that I'm on parole, the parole officer told me
[48:49.200 --> 48:53.360] more than once that if I don't make a full confession
[48:53.360 --> 48:56.080] of guilt to the charges I was convicted of
[48:57.440 --> 48:59.600] to the sex offender treatment provider
[48:59.600 --> 49:04.000] and to her as well, that I would be put back in prison.
[49:04.000 --> 49:06.640] Both my parole officer and treatment provider
[49:06.640 --> 49:09.280] threatened me saying I'll be put back in prison
[49:09.280 --> 49:12.520] if I don't sign a sex offender treatment contract
[49:12.520 --> 49:15.600] in which is numerous pages long.
[49:15.600 --> 49:18.560] And in the contract it states that I acknowledge
[49:18.560 --> 49:21.360] full guilt to the charges I was convicted of
[49:21.360 --> 49:24.360] that I must give a full confession of guilt.
[49:24.360 --> 49:27.640] My officer and sex offender treatment provider
[49:29.160 --> 49:33.080] both say that if I don't take the numerous polygraphs
[49:33.080 --> 49:35.080] they demand me to take,
[49:35.080 --> 49:38.040] that I will be put back in prison.
[49:38.040 --> 49:41.680] The polygraphs consist of questions and interrogations
[49:41.680 --> 49:44.040] regarding the charges I was convicted of,
[49:44.040 --> 49:47.240] my sexual history, and intensive questions
[49:47.240 --> 49:49.480] about if I have committed any more offense
[49:51.200 --> 49:54.040] or violations while I'm parole.
[49:54.040 --> 49:57.920] I told the polygrapher, the polygrapher,
[49:57.920 --> 50:01.160] before he gave me the first test that my parole officer said
[50:01.160 --> 50:03.160] if I refused to take it,
[50:03.160 --> 50:05.320] that I would be locked back up in prison.
[50:05.320 --> 50:09.120] He responded by saying that yes, it is true.
[50:09.120 --> 50:12.320] I have told my parole officer and treatment provider
[50:12.320 --> 50:15.440] that I could not talk about the charges I was convicted of
[50:15.440 --> 50:18.480] because I am working on appealing my convictions.
[50:18.480 --> 50:22.680] I ended up signing the contract and taking the polygraph
[50:22.680 --> 50:25.160] since they threatened to revoke my parole
[50:25.160 --> 50:27.080] and put me back in prison.
[50:27.080 --> 50:28.880] The treatment provider and my parole officer
[50:28.880 --> 50:32.120] after the polygraph told me that I failed
[50:33.280 --> 50:37.120] and I was lying about the charges I was convicted of.
[50:37.120 --> 50:38.640] I asked them to go over the results
[50:38.640 --> 50:41.200] of the polygraph test with me and show me
[50:42.400 --> 50:45.200] that they refused and claimed they don't do that
[50:46.440 --> 50:49.080] since they threatened more than once to lock me back up
[50:49.080 --> 50:50.360] if I didn't confess guilt.
[50:50.360 --> 50:53.720] I ended up saying I did what they were accusing me of
[50:53.720 --> 50:54.640] lying about.
[50:55.800 --> 50:58.240] I believe they don't have the right
[50:58.240 --> 51:00.400] to interfere with my 11.07
[51:00.400 --> 51:05.200] but I'm sure they will interfere once I filed it
[51:05.200 --> 51:06.960] and they find out.
[51:06.960 --> 51:08.960] The police department of the county I was convicted
[51:08.960 --> 51:13.160] and refused to sell me the copy of the police report.
[51:13.160 --> 51:15.800] They refused to give it to me and that's about it.
[51:20.520 --> 51:21.560] Can you hear me?
[51:21.560 --> 51:22.480] Yeah, we can hear you.
[51:22.480 --> 51:24.080] Randy's mauling it over here.
[51:24.080 --> 51:27.640] You probably get a kick out of this,
[51:27.640 --> 51:32.640] these court reporter's records I was able to obtain.
[51:36.280 --> 51:38.040] There's some stuff said in here in court
[51:38.040 --> 51:42.240] that's a little bit humorous but.
[51:45.480 --> 51:47.440] Okay, well, first thing is,
[51:47.440 --> 51:50.400] is even as a condition of your parole,
[51:50.400 --> 51:53.560] they can't make you sign a contract agreeing
[51:53.560 --> 51:55.780] to confess to other crimes.
[51:56.840 --> 52:01.840] Nor can they use the polygraph to secure information
[52:02.520 --> 52:06.640] that will be used as evidence against you in any new crime.
[52:09.160 --> 52:12.920] Nor can they compel you to confess to a crime
[52:14.800 --> 52:19.800] in order to place you on parole if you qualified for parole.
[52:19.800 --> 52:21.800] All of these are coercive treatments
[52:21.800 --> 52:25.240] to get you to waive rights that you have
[52:25.240 --> 52:28.800] in order to facilitate the system keeping its grip on you.
[52:29.800 --> 52:30.640] Randy?
[52:30.640 --> 52:33.160] This is a little more difficult
[52:34.880 --> 52:39.880] because he has a conviction and he is out of prison
[52:41.000 --> 52:43.880] at the pleasure of the system.
[52:46.280 --> 52:48.120] It mitigates the crime.
[52:48.120 --> 52:52.040] It mitigates his rights considerably
[52:52.040 --> 52:54.960] while they cannot compel a confession.
[52:57.160 --> 53:00.640] I think this takes a knowledge,
[53:01.720 --> 53:03.880] a specific knowledge of this area
[53:03.880 --> 53:06.320] that's a lot beyond my scope
[53:08.520 --> 53:10.400] because you're out based on contract.
[53:10.400 --> 53:11.680] This is all contract.
[53:11.680 --> 53:16.680] I would need to know under what conditions
[53:18.240 --> 53:22.000] you agreed in order to secure parole.
[53:24.160 --> 53:26.000] If you have agreed to these things
[53:26.000 --> 53:28.680] in order to secure parole,
[53:28.680 --> 53:33.000] then you have an issue, you have a problem with that.
[53:33.000 --> 53:37.880] Your issue may go back to the state
[53:37.880 --> 53:41.760] not being allowed to create these conditions,
[53:42.960 --> 53:45.920] but in order to argue these issues,
[53:45.920 --> 53:48.760] you have to argue the right questions.
[53:48.760 --> 53:52.760] If you've agreed to a set of conditions
[53:52.760 --> 53:55.400] and now they're pressing for those conditions,
[53:56.600 --> 54:00.760] you can't object because if you do,
[54:00.760 --> 54:02.680] they can put you back in jail.
[54:02.680 --> 54:07.680] So you certainly have the choice not to confess,
[54:09.400 --> 54:13.080] but they have the choice where they leave you out
[54:13.080 --> 54:14.200] or put you back.
[54:16.440 --> 54:19.160] This is a sophisticated area of law
[54:19.160 --> 54:22.840] which I frankly don't know squat.
[54:25.000 --> 54:27.200] Eddie, do you know any more about this area?
[54:28.240 --> 54:30.920] Well, I've been looking at a lot of the felony stuff.
[54:30.920 --> 54:32.960] I know a lot of the things they're trying to do
[54:32.960 --> 54:37.120] in these processes, they're absolutely illegal,
[54:38.040 --> 54:41.440] especially the part about on the part of your,
[54:41.440 --> 54:44.280] one of the conditions of your release on parole
[54:44.280 --> 54:46.560] is that you must make a full confession.
[54:47.440 --> 54:50.920] I mean, that simply cannot be allowed.
[54:50.920 --> 54:55.920] Yeah, rationally, I would say that sounds like something
[54:56.680 --> 54:58.680] that absolutely should be legal,
[54:58.680 --> 55:02.720] but I don't have the background, the knowledge
[55:02.720 --> 55:05.200] in that area to know if it is illegal or not.
[55:06.120 --> 55:09.480] I remember what the president said,
[55:11.480 --> 55:16.040] Nixon, then the president does it, it's not illegal.
[55:16.040 --> 55:19.120] Yeah, but that was as big a lie as everything else he said.
[55:19.120 --> 55:24.120] Well, if he has a bogus, crappy law put in place
[55:24.840 --> 55:27.240] that allows him to do something,
[55:27.240 --> 55:31.920] that's absolutely, completely and totally unconstitutional.
[55:31.920 --> 55:34.680] He could still do it until it's,
[55:34.680 --> 55:37.200] the law is shown to be unconstitutional.
[55:39.200 --> 55:43.640] So my question is, what is the law in this matter?
[55:46.360 --> 55:51.200] Johan, have you researched the law in this matter?
[55:51.200 --> 55:56.200] Well, I can tell you that the statement that he's alleging
[55:58.840 --> 56:00.920] to here is not in the law.
[56:00.920 --> 56:04.440] The statement is only in whatever written agreement
[56:04.440 --> 56:06.320] they're conning him into signing.
[56:06.320 --> 56:09.440] No, I mean, the conditions of parole,
[56:09.440 --> 56:14.320] are the conditions of parole such that he has entered
[56:14.320 --> 56:18.520] into a contract to do these certain things
[56:18.520 --> 56:22.200] and is the contract conscionable and legal?
[56:26.440 --> 56:29.640] Is the contract, again, what's that last part you said?
[56:29.640 --> 56:31.760] The parole agreement you signed.
[56:33.240 --> 56:36.920] In order to secure release, you entered into a contract
[56:36.920 --> 56:39.280] and in that contract, you waived certain rights
[56:39.280 --> 56:42.640] on the condition that they would release you for prison.
[56:42.640 --> 56:44.600] This is often acceptance.
[56:44.600 --> 56:49.600] So it's important to understand what they have offered,
[56:49.600 --> 56:54.120] what you have accepted, and then look at what you have
[56:54.120 --> 56:59.120] accepted and look at this standing law to see if that
[57:00.200 --> 57:05.200] kind of condition can be included in a contract.
[57:05.400 --> 57:08.080] Or would it be unconscionable?
[57:08.080 --> 57:13.000] Generally, a contractual provision is unconscionable.
[57:13.000 --> 57:15.600] If it gives one side a benefit
[57:15.600 --> 57:20.240] without giving a corresponding benefit to the other side.
[57:23.400 --> 57:28.000] So this is not something we can look at directly from law.
[57:28.000 --> 57:31.160] We're gonna have to look at it from contract.
[57:31.160 --> 57:34.120] I'm relatively certain, but this goes to paroles
[57:34.120 --> 57:38.400] and there's a lot of rules and pardons and paroles.
[57:38.400 --> 57:43.400] And they're not gonna be the same as what you would see
[57:43.920 --> 57:48.440] out here in constitution and statutes
[57:48.440 --> 57:50.680] because they're under contract.
[57:53.320 --> 57:57.400] Absolutely, but I would not, what is your name?
[57:57.400 --> 57:58.240] Eddie?
[58:01.520 --> 58:02.520] Eddie, you there?
[58:02.520 --> 58:07.520] Okay, I missed part of it because I dropped out.
[58:10.880 --> 58:14.040] I don't know how we can help you with a lot more.
[58:14.040 --> 58:19.040] But read the agreement that you made, you got out,
[58:19.440 --> 58:21.200] and then call us back next week.
[58:21.200 --> 58:23.360] Kind of give us an opposite agreement.
[58:23.360 --> 58:26.200] Give you a better idea of what you can do.
[58:27.640 --> 58:30.320] Okay, but I suggest you try to like
[58:30.320 --> 58:32.720] try to get water here.
[58:32.720 --> 58:34.040] All right.
[58:34.040 --> 58:36.520] You don't want to get put back in prison for something
[58:36.520 --> 58:39.360] you didn't realize when you get to the contract council.
[58:39.360 --> 58:41.720] This is Randy Calvin, David Stevens, Eddie Craig,
[58:41.720 --> 58:45.760] we have the radio, we'll be right back on the other side.
[58:45.760 --> 58:48.840] Julius Eric Robert, we'll pick you up on the other side.
[58:50.080 --> 58:52.520] Would you like to make more definite progress
[58:52.520 --> 58:53.840] in your walk with God?
[58:53.840 --> 58:57.320] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible
[58:57.320 --> 59:00.760] and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:00.760 --> 59:02.440] The New Testament recovery version
[59:02.440 --> 59:04.760] is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles
[59:04.760 --> 59:05.960] available today.
[59:05.960 --> 59:07.520] It's an accurate translation
[59:07.520 --> 59:09.600] and it contains thousands of footnotes
[59:09.600 --> 59:11.160] that will help you to know God
[59:11.160 --> 59:13.240] and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.240 --> 59:15.400] The free books are a three volume set
[59:15.400 --> 59:18.200] called basic elements of the Christian life.
[59:18.200 --> 59:21.200] Chapter by chapter, basic elements of the Christian life
[59:21.200 --> 59:24.040] clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.040 --> 59:27.640] growing in Christ and how to build up the church
[59:27.640 --> 59:30.560] to order your free New Testament recovery version
[59:30.560 --> 59:33.640] and basic elements of the Christian life.
[59:33.640 --> 59:38.640] Call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.320 --> 59:44.880] That's 888-551-0102.
[59:44.880 --> 59:49.280] Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:49.280 --> 59:54.280] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network
[59:54.280 --> 59:59.280] at www.logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:04.280 --> 01:00:07.280] The magic council is now officially off my list
[01:00:07.280 --> 01:00:09.280] to go to attractions.
[01:00:09.280 --> 01:00:11.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back to tell you
[01:00:11.280 --> 01:00:14.280] why Disney theme parks have gone from cheery
[01:00:14.280 --> 01:00:16.280] to creepy in a moment.
[01:00:16.280 --> 01:00:18.280] Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:18.280 --> 01:00:20.280] When you give up data about yourself
[01:00:20.280 --> 01:00:22.280] you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:22.280 --> 01:00:24.280] And once your privacy is gone,
[01:00:24.280 --> 01:00:27.280] you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:27.280 --> 01:00:30.280] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance
[01:00:30.280 --> 01:00:32.280] and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:32.280 --> 01:00:35.280] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:35.280 --> 01:00:38.280] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com
[01:00:38.280 --> 01:00:40.280] the private search engine alternative
[01:00:40.280 --> 01:00:42.280] to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:00:42.280 --> 01:00:44.280] Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:44.280 --> 01:00:48.280] Disney World has lots of spooky attractions
[01:00:48.280 --> 01:00:51.280] like the Tower of Terror and the Haunted Mansion.
[01:00:51.280 --> 01:00:53.280] But they're planning something that sends
[01:00:53.280 --> 01:00:55.280] a real chill down my spine.
[01:00:55.280 --> 01:00:58.280] RFID spy chips to track visitors every move.
[01:00:58.280 --> 01:01:01.280] Disney is testing guest bracelets embedded
[01:01:01.280 --> 01:01:03.280] with tiny microchips.
[01:01:03.280 --> 01:01:05.280] These interact with readers hidden around the park
[01:01:05.280 --> 01:01:08.280] to secretly identify, profile and track you
[01:01:08.280 --> 01:01:11.280] as you walk around recording your every move.
[01:01:11.280 --> 01:01:14.280] Disney says guests can use the new magic wristbands
[01:01:14.280 --> 01:01:16.280] to air act with attractions
[01:01:16.280 --> 01:01:19.280] and to buy things cashlessly with the wave of a wrist.
[01:01:19.280 --> 01:01:22.280] Magic wristbands to me these sound more like
[01:01:22.280 --> 01:01:24.280] total surveillance handcuffs.
[01:01:24.280 --> 01:01:27.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com
[01:01:27.280 --> 01:01:29.280] the world's most private search engine.
[01:01:34.280 --> 01:01:36.280] Don't touch that dial.
[01:01:36.280 --> 01:01:39.280] Seriously, it may be rigged to scan your hand.
[01:01:39.280 --> 01:01:41.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht back to tell you
[01:01:41.280 --> 01:01:43.280] how a children's media corporation
[01:01:43.280 --> 01:01:46.280] is developing some scary sci-fi next.
[01:01:46.280 --> 01:01:48.280] Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:48.280 --> 01:01:50.280] When you give up data about yourself
[01:01:50.280 --> 01:01:52.280] you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.280 --> 01:01:54.280] And once your privacy is gone
[01:01:54.280 --> 01:01:57.280] you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.280 --> 01:01:59.280] So protect your rights.
[01:01:59.280 --> 01:02:02.280] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.280 --> 01:02:05.280] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.280 --> 01:02:07.280] This message is brought to you by
[01:02:07.280 --> 01:02:10.280] StartPage.com the private search engine alternative
[01:02:10.280 --> 01:02:12.280] to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:02:12.280 --> 01:02:15.280] Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.280 --> 01:02:19.280] Bet you didn't know Disney had a research arm.
[01:02:19.280 --> 01:02:22.280] Well they do and what they're developing is not child's play.
[01:02:22.280 --> 01:02:25.280] How about doorknobs that recognize your touch
[01:02:25.280 --> 01:02:28.280] or phones that go silent when you wave your hand
[01:02:28.280 --> 01:02:31.280] or chairs that dim the lights when you lean back.
[01:02:31.280 --> 01:02:33.280] Those are just some of the smart objects
[01:02:33.280 --> 01:02:35.280] being built by Disney research
[01:02:35.280 --> 01:02:37.280] where things around you will be aware.
[01:02:37.280 --> 01:02:40.280] Ever watching and anticipating your desires
[01:02:40.280 --> 01:02:42.280] in an interactive brave new world.
[01:02:42.280 --> 01:02:45.280] But do we really want our furniture watching us?
[01:02:45.280 --> 01:02:47.280] Once this stuff is linked to the internet
[01:02:47.280 --> 01:02:50.280] pretty soon the walls and even the doors will talk.
[01:02:50.280 --> 01:02:52.280] Hey, let's lock the door on that idea.
[01:02:52.280 --> 01:02:53.280] Throw away the key.
[01:02:53.280 --> 01:02:56.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com
[01:02:56.280 --> 01:03:06.280] the world's most private search engine.
[01:03:26.280 --> 01:03:41.280] Okay, we are back.
[01:03:41.280 --> 01:03:53.280] We're going to Julius in Tejas.
[01:03:53.280 --> 01:03:54.280] Talk to us Julius.
[01:03:54.280 --> 01:03:56.280] What do you got for us today?
[01:03:56.280 --> 01:03:59.280] How are you doing Randy and Eddie?
[01:03:59.280 --> 01:04:05.280] I'm doing good Eddie sucks.
[01:04:05.280 --> 01:04:08.280] Now he may have a different opinion of that
[01:04:08.280 --> 01:04:11.280] but I'm older and wiser so I know these things.
[01:04:11.280 --> 01:04:13.280] That's it, that's it.
[01:04:13.280 --> 01:04:18.280] Oh man, I want an indigent hearing yesterday
[01:04:18.280 --> 01:04:23.280] on one of my cases that I'm going to get my transcripts for free.
[01:04:23.280 --> 01:04:28.280] So this was a nice step in the right direction.
[01:04:28.280 --> 01:04:33.280] Oh wait, that was the hearing was for an indigency hearing
[01:04:33.280 --> 01:04:36.280] or an inability to pay?
[01:04:36.280 --> 01:04:44.280] I got a conviction on this impeding traffic situation citation
[01:04:44.280 --> 01:04:47.280] and I'm trying to get an appeal.
[01:04:47.280 --> 01:04:50.280] So I filed for an appeal of this case
[01:04:50.280 --> 01:04:53.280] but I also filed an affidavit of indigent
[01:04:53.280 --> 01:04:59.280] and then I filed yesterday and I came up with...
[01:04:59.280 --> 01:05:02.280] Let me give a little bit of explaining about that.
[01:05:02.280 --> 01:05:07.280] An affidavit of inability to pay doesn't mean that you're indigent,
[01:05:07.280 --> 01:05:10.280] that you're homeless, that you're flat broke,
[01:05:10.280 --> 01:05:12.280] that you don't have any money.
[01:05:12.280 --> 01:05:19.280] What it means is that the amount that this will cost you
[01:05:19.280 --> 01:05:24.280] to secure justice would dramatically interfere
[01:05:24.280 --> 01:05:31.280] with your ability to sustain your regular cash flow,
[01:05:31.280 --> 01:05:33.280] your regular bills and such.
[01:05:33.280 --> 01:05:36.280] It would just be not that it would be impossible
[01:05:36.280 --> 01:05:39.280] but it would be an injustice.
[01:05:39.280 --> 01:05:43.280] So anybody who's looking at an issue like this,
[01:05:43.280 --> 01:05:47.280] affidavit of inability to pay doesn't mean you're broke
[01:05:47.280 --> 01:05:49.280] or homeless or anything like that.
[01:05:49.280 --> 01:05:51.280] It just means that this will cost so much
[01:05:51.280 --> 01:05:53.280] that it will be prohibited that it would interfere
[01:05:53.280 --> 01:05:57.280] with your ability to educate your issue.
[01:05:57.280 --> 01:05:59.280] Okay, go ahead, Julius.
[01:05:59.280 --> 01:06:04.280] Wait, Julius, did you find a place to live?
[01:06:04.280 --> 01:06:06.280] I'll just get into it now.
[01:06:06.280 --> 01:06:09.280] I have a bridge. I found a bridge.
[01:06:09.280 --> 01:06:11.280] Yes.
[01:06:11.280 --> 01:06:13.280] But I won the hearing.
[01:06:13.280 --> 01:06:15.280] I want to tell you what happened.
[01:06:15.280 --> 01:06:17.280] I did file this affidavit,
[01:06:17.280 --> 01:06:20.280] and I did go down there with all my financials
[01:06:20.280 --> 01:06:22.280] and then just showed them how this would be,
[01:06:22.280 --> 01:06:27.280] as you said, exactly, financially a hardship for me
[01:06:27.280 --> 01:06:30.280] to come up with the money for these transcripts, et cetera,
[01:06:30.280 --> 01:06:34.280] to do my appeal, and I wanted my appeal.
[01:06:34.280 --> 01:06:38.280] Now, the judge, before he had started the proceeding,
[01:06:38.280 --> 01:06:43.280] he kind of clued me in that he was probably going to deny me.
[01:06:43.280 --> 01:06:45.280] And I said, well, Your Honor,
[01:06:45.280 --> 01:06:47.280] I have the opportunity to be heard,
[01:06:47.280 --> 01:06:50.280] and I would like to be heard right now.
[01:06:50.280 --> 01:06:52.280] I'm going to make my standing objections.
[01:06:52.280 --> 01:06:55.280] The usual suspects, I object to the court
[01:06:55.280 --> 01:06:58.280] having lack of subject matter jurisdiction,
[01:06:58.280 --> 01:07:01.280] lack of impersonal, lack of standing, et cetera.
[01:07:01.280 --> 01:07:04.280] I mean, I went through the whole ball of wax.
[01:07:04.280 --> 01:07:06.280] After I got through all my objections,
[01:07:06.280 --> 01:07:10.280] I also told the judge that you are aware
[01:07:10.280 --> 01:07:13.280] that judges have no immunity when they proceed
[01:07:13.280 --> 01:07:15.280] without jurisdiction.
[01:07:15.280 --> 01:07:18.280] You're aware of that, is that correct, Your Honor?
[01:07:18.280 --> 01:07:22.280] So I made him aware that I'm aware.
[01:07:22.280 --> 01:07:26.280] And throughout the proceedings, he just kind of changed.
[01:07:26.280 --> 01:07:28.280] He changed colors a little bit.
[01:07:28.280 --> 01:07:29.280] He parked his ears up.
[01:07:29.280 --> 01:07:32.280] He was listening to me, and I said to the court reporter,
[01:07:32.280 --> 01:07:36.280] could you please read me back on the record
[01:07:36.280 --> 01:07:38.280] what I had just stated?
[01:07:38.280 --> 01:07:42.280] And the judge has no need for that, Mr. Mano,
[01:07:42.280 --> 01:07:46.280] because I assure you that it's on the record.
[01:07:46.280 --> 01:07:48.280] You have been heard.
[01:07:48.280 --> 01:07:50.280] The court has heard you.
[01:07:50.280 --> 01:07:52.280] You know, it stands on the record.
[01:07:52.280 --> 01:07:57.280] And I was saying, OK, and then he started looking into my case.
[01:07:57.280 --> 01:08:00.280] Actually, the first time a judge ever did that,
[01:08:00.280 --> 01:08:02.280] in these municipal courts,
[01:08:02.280 --> 01:08:05.280] where he looked at some of my filings.
[01:08:05.280 --> 01:08:07.280] He turned around and said, I'm going to look at, you know,
[01:08:07.280 --> 01:08:08.280] you filed several motions.
[01:08:08.280 --> 01:08:10.280] I'm going to look here, you know, for a second,
[01:08:10.280 --> 01:08:12.280] I see that you filed this or that motion.
[01:08:12.280 --> 01:08:14.280] I said, oh, thank you, Your Honor.
[01:08:14.280 --> 01:08:17.280] It's the first time I've ever seen a judge do that.
[01:08:17.280 --> 01:08:20.280] The first time I've ever seen a judge in these municipal courts
[01:08:20.280 --> 01:08:23.280] that would read or listen to a motion that I filed.
[01:08:23.280 --> 01:08:25.280] I appreciate that.
[01:08:25.280 --> 01:08:28.280] So I gave him a little bit of, you know,
[01:08:28.280 --> 01:08:33.280] hey, thank you, you know, and thank you for hearing me, et cetera.
[01:08:33.280 --> 01:08:37.280] And anyway, the rep shot of this hearing was,
[01:08:37.280 --> 01:08:39.280] he said, I'm going to give you my decision.
[01:08:39.280 --> 01:08:42.280] By the end of the day, someone will call you.
[01:08:42.280 --> 01:08:45.280] OK, thank you, Your Honor.
[01:08:45.280 --> 01:08:48.280] Well, they called me back and they,
[01:08:48.280 --> 01:08:51.280] and he gave me my indigence, you know,
[01:08:51.280 --> 01:08:53.280] so I won't have to pay for my transcripts.
[01:08:53.280 --> 01:08:55.280] And it's just, I don't know,
[01:08:55.280 --> 01:08:58.280] it's just like this little political kind of,
[01:08:58.280 --> 01:09:00.280] like I was communicating with him,
[01:09:00.280 --> 01:09:02.280] even though they corrupt, even though we know
[01:09:02.280 --> 01:09:07.280] they do things completely outside of law and they're bound.
[01:09:07.280 --> 01:09:13.280] I think you were wise in letting him know that you knew.
[01:09:13.280 --> 01:09:19.280] So you gave him fair warning that, you know,
[01:09:19.280 --> 01:09:24.280] he's not concerned about you winning the suit against him.
[01:09:24.280 --> 01:09:29.280] He's concerned about you filing a suit against him
[01:09:29.280 --> 01:09:34.280] and him having to deal with the suit.
[01:09:34.280 --> 01:09:37.280] So that's that for these judges.
[01:09:37.280 --> 01:09:41.280] I have a friend who was a JP and he really,
[01:09:41.280 --> 01:09:45.280] really got excited when someone filed a suit against him,
[01:09:45.280 --> 01:09:50.280] which only happened once because he was an excellent JP.
[01:09:50.280 --> 01:09:54.280] He was an ex-sheriff and a Baptist preacher,
[01:09:54.280 --> 01:09:56.280] but he got over that.
[01:09:56.280 --> 01:10:01.280] Just kidding, but he was, he was really,
[01:10:01.280 --> 01:10:06.280] if there was ever a man that I knew that I felt like
[01:10:06.280 --> 01:10:11.280] would do what he believed was right if an heir lived the Pope,
[01:10:11.280 --> 01:10:13.280] it was Mark Autry.
[01:10:13.280 --> 01:10:16.280] But he still got sued once and he was,
[01:10:16.280 --> 01:10:18.280] it really got to him.
[01:10:18.280 --> 01:10:20.280] He was really excited about that.
[01:10:20.280 --> 01:10:23.280] And that told me, and then Mark knew for certain
[01:10:23.280 --> 01:10:27.280] that he had done everything right, he was extremely careful.
[01:10:27.280 --> 01:10:33.280] And never seen him be rude to someone in his court.
[01:10:33.280 --> 01:10:37.280] I did have the good fortune of being in his courtroom once.
[01:10:37.280 --> 01:10:40.280] His bailiff was about 65 years old.
[01:10:40.280 --> 01:10:45.280] Then he had this guy in there that was incredibly belligerent.
[01:10:45.280 --> 01:10:49.280] And the guy was, it was a family issue,
[01:10:49.280 --> 01:10:52.280] something to do with property division.
[01:10:52.280 --> 01:10:55.280] I don't know why he was in the small claims,
[01:10:55.280 --> 01:10:58.280] but the guy was getting real excited.
[01:10:58.280 --> 01:11:03.280] And the bailiff asked him to calm down.
[01:11:03.280 --> 01:11:06.280] And he threatened the bailiff.
[01:11:06.280 --> 01:11:11.280] And Mark Autry stood up from behind the bench.
[01:11:11.280 --> 01:11:14.280] His hands are twice the size of mine.
[01:11:14.280 --> 01:11:17.280] And he told the guy,
[01:11:17.280 --> 01:11:22.280] you do not want to harm my bailiff,
[01:11:22.280 --> 01:11:25.280] or you'll have to deal with me.
[01:11:25.280 --> 01:11:30.280] It was absolutely wonderful to see a judge
[01:11:30.280 --> 01:11:33.280] actually availed threat.
[01:11:33.280 --> 01:11:36.280] I'll whip you're behind.
[01:11:36.280 --> 01:11:38.280] And that put an end to the nonsense.
[01:11:38.280 --> 01:11:41.280] But he was, he was really a good judge.
[01:11:41.280 --> 01:11:45.280] But the point was, is the suit really affected him.
[01:11:45.280 --> 01:11:48.280] So I think this judge, you were telling this judge,
[01:11:48.280 --> 01:11:52.280] I'm setting you up so I can sue you.
[01:11:52.280 --> 01:11:55.280] And I'm putting on the record that you absolutely know.
[01:11:55.280 --> 01:11:59.280] I think he really got it and it made him more careful.
[01:11:59.280 --> 01:12:01.280] So that's wonderful. That is wonderful.
[01:12:01.280 --> 01:12:03.280] And thanks to you guys.
[01:12:03.280 --> 01:12:05.280] I mean, you know, I'm learning all the stuff from you guys,
[01:12:05.280 --> 01:12:08.280] but I'll tell you, it really made a difference.
[01:12:08.280 --> 01:12:12.280] And I was very, very cordial and very polite
[01:12:12.280 --> 01:12:15.280] to be, you know, trying to follow the rules.
[01:12:15.280 --> 01:12:18.280] And I'm trying to speak my language.
[01:12:18.280 --> 01:12:24.280] That gives you the appearance of being far more dangerous.
[01:12:24.280 --> 01:12:26.280] Yeah.
[01:12:26.280 --> 01:12:30.280] You got somebody in here who's not getting excited,
[01:12:30.280 --> 01:12:33.280] who's calm and collected and just walking through the motions.
[01:12:33.280 --> 01:12:35.280] That makes him nervous.
[01:12:35.280 --> 01:12:37.280] No, you should doing it wrong, man.
[01:12:37.280 --> 01:12:39.280] You go in there and say, look, judge,
[01:12:39.280 --> 01:12:41.280] if you'll stand up and do that sphincter removal move,
[01:12:41.280 --> 01:12:45.280] you can both breathe and think clearly.
[01:12:45.280 --> 01:12:47.280] Dismiss this case.
[01:12:47.280 --> 01:12:50.280] Yeah, I will tear your honor off.
[01:12:50.280 --> 01:12:52.280] Yeah, try that.
[01:12:52.280 --> 01:12:55.280] Let's just go straight to the tree in the rope, Eddie.
[01:12:55.280 --> 01:12:57.280] Hey, you got my vote.
[01:12:57.280 --> 01:13:00.280] Let's just go straight to the tree in the rope.
[01:13:00.280 --> 01:13:02.280] That's good.
[01:13:02.280 --> 01:13:06.280] It pleases me that our information is helping.
[01:13:06.280 --> 01:13:10.280] And when you thank us for our information,
[01:13:10.280 --> 01:13:14.280] remember Randy's beer fund.
[01:13:14.280 --> 01:13:16.280] I always did.
[01:13:16.280 --> 01:13:19.280] It's got two nickels in it.
[01:13:19.280 --> 01:13:21.280] I think it may have three nickels in it.
[01:13:21.280 --> 01:13:23.280] Okay, well, we're going to have to fatten that up a little bit.
[01:13:23.280 --> 01:13:26.280] You know, I even got a guy on my block that makes beer,
[01:13:26.280 --> 01:13:28.280] you know, like from scratch.
[01:13:28.280 --> 01:13:29.280] It's fabulous.
[01:13:29.280 --> 01:13:34.280] I mean, he just, the best beer maker I've ever seen.
[01:13:34.280 --> 01:13:36.280] I mean, just like I couldn't believe,
[01:13:36.280 --> 01:13:39.280] I'm not a beer drinker, but he makes fabulous beer.
[01:13:39.280 --> 01:13:42.280] Well, I drink a beer.
[01:13:42.280 --> 01:13:46.280] If I meet Mexican food, I can drink a beer.
[01:13:46.280 --> 01:13:47.280] Yes.
[01:13:47.280 --> 01:13:50.280] Second beer, just in case, right?
[01:13:50.280 --> 01:13:51.280] Yeah.
[01:13:51.280 --> 01:13:52.280] I'm alive.
[01:13:52.280 --> 01:13:55.280] Deborah calls me a lightweight and she's right.
[01:13:55.280 --> 01:13:57.280] Yeah.
[01:13:57.280 --> 01:13:58.280] Okay.
[01:13:58.280 --> 01:14:00.280] That is good to hear, Julius.
[01:14:00.280 --> 01:14:01.280] Yep.
[01:14:01.280 --> 01:14:02.280] Thank you guys.
[01:14:02.280 --> 01:14:06.280] Keep up the good work and I want to hear that you won the case.
[01:14:06.280 --> 01:14:07.280] Yes.
[01:14:07.280 --> 01:14:08.280] The next time you call.
[01:14:08.280 --> 01:14:09.280] So when it goes.
[01:14:09.280 --> 01:14:10.280] Okay.
[01:14:10.280 --> 01:14:11.280] Do you have anything else for us?
[01:14:11.280 --> 01:14:12.280] Yes.
[01:14:12.280 --> 01:14:14.280] Just one other thing and just put your thinking cap on,
[01:14:14.280 --> 01:14:16.280] but I want you to get to your next callers or something.
[01:14:16.280 --> 01:14:20.280] But I really got a bug in my ear about you saying the following
[01:14:20.280 --> 01:14:23.280] criminal charges of sedition and Eddie explained to me,
[01:14:23.280 --> 01:14:28.280] because I wrote up a criminal charge and Eddie said to me,
[01:14:28.280 --> 01:14:32.280] that's not how you do it because it's not what they do to you.
[01:14:32.280 --> 01:14:35.280] And I think Eddie, if you chime in, it's really,
[01:14:35.280 --> 01:14:44.280] as I see it, it's how you alter the constitutional law that is the issue.
[01:14:44.280 --> 01:14:46.280] Is that correct, Eddie?
[01:14:46.280 --> 01:14:49.280] I'm not quite sure I follow the question you're asking.
[01:14:49.280 --> 01:14:52.280] Can you explain it a little differently?
[01:14:52.280 --> 01:14:53.280] No.
[01:14:53.280 --> 01:14:54.280] All right.
[01:14:54.280 --> 01:14:59.280] I wanted to file criminal charges of sedition against Jenkins.
[01:14:59.280 --> 01:15:00.280] Right.
[01:15:00.280 --> 01:15:07.280] But I wrote up criminal charges about what he did to me in the court proceedings
[01:15:07.280 --> 01:15:09.280] and how he violated law.
[01:15:09.280 --> 01:15:11.280] I mean, just didn't follow the due process.
[01:15:11.280 --> 01:15:12.280] Right.
[01:15:12.280 --> 01:15:15.280] Didn't give me, you know, I wasn't heard.
[01:15:15.280 --> 01:15:17.280] I mean, all due process violations, right?
[01:15:17.280 --> 01:15:19.280] No lack of jurisdiction, whatever.
[01:15:19.280 --> 01:15:24.280] But that is not how you're supposed to put that in the complaint.
[01:15:24.280 --> 01:15:27.280] It's supposed to be other verbiage.
[01:15:27.280 --> 01:15:29.280] I mean, and the perspective I think you said was wrong.
[01:15:29.280 --> 01:15:32.280] It's not what they do to you, Julius.
[01:15:32.280 --> 01:15:35.280] It's something else.
[01:15:35.280 --> 01:15:38.280] It's not the process they go through.
[01:15:38.280 --> 01:15:41.280] It's the harm they cause.
[01:15:41.280 --> 01:15:45.280] You have to specify how they harmed you by their action.
[01:15:45.280 --> 01:15:47.280] It's just like it would be in a lawsuit.
[01:15:47.280 --> 01:15:48.280] Okay.
[01:15:48.280 --> 01:15:49.280] I see.
[01:15:49.280 --> 01:15:54.280] Well, actually, in a criminal complaint, you don't have to claim harm.
[01:15:54.280 --> 01:16:00.280] Well, you don't have to claim harm, but you have to show that a harm was committed to constitute a crime.
[01:16:00.280 --> 01:16:06.280] You have reason to believe and do believe the following facts give me the reason.
[01:16:06.280 --> 01:16:08.280] It doesn't have to be a harm.
[01:16:08.280 --> 01:16:12.280] You have to stipulate a violation of the statute.
[01:16:12.280 --> 01:16:17.280] For instance, I'll say officers so and so committed this act.
[01:16:17.280 --> 01:16:25.280] I'll do a statement of facts on this day at this time.
[01:16:25.280 --> 01:16:28.280] I was stopped by officers so and so.
[01:16:28.280 --> 01:16:29.280] He did this.
[01:16:29.280 --> 01:16:30.280] He did this.
[01:16:30.280 --> 01:16:31.280] He did this.
[01:16:31.280 --> 01:16:32.280] He did this.
[01:16:32.280 --> 01:16:34.280] By the above.
[01:16:34.280 --> 01:16:39.280] I alleged that officers so and so failed to perform the duty he was required to perform.
[01:16:39.280 --> 01:16:44.280] But in the process, denied me the hope for access to employment, right?
[01:16:44.280 --> 01:16:47.280] That's the violation of the 3903 p.m. code.
[01:16:47.280 --> 01:16:51.280] We'll speak to this when we get back on the other side.
[01:16:51.280 --> 01:16:56.280] Lady Craig with our radio are calling number 502-606-1984.
[01:16:56.280 --> 01:17:00.280] We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.280 --> 01:17:09.280] At Capital Coin in Boolean, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.280 --> 01:17:13.280] Capital Coin features a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:13.280 --> 01:17:20.280] In addition to providing the best prices in the nation, we want to bring you the best shopping experience both in-store and online.
[01:17:20.280 --> 01:17:27.280] In addition to coins and Boolean, we carry popular young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burst.
[01:17:27.280 --> 01:17:34.280] We offer freeze-dried, storeable foods by August and Farms, Bergy Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:34.280 --> 01:17:39.280] You can lock in a spot price with our Silver Pool, and we set up Metals IRA accounts.
[01:17:39.280 --> 01:17:43.280] Call us at 512-646-644-0 for more details.
[01:17:43.280 --> 01:17:48.280] We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half-mile south of Amerson.
[01:17:48.280 --> 01:17:52.280] We're open Monday through Friday 10-6, Saturday 10-2.
[01:17:52.280 --> 01:18:10.280] Visit us at CapitalCoinandBoolean.com or call 512-646-644-0.
[01:18:23.280 --> 01:18:31.280] Finally, residential, mobile and business telephones and plans that are private and never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:31.280 --> 01:18:38.280] Want a low price? Residential and business plans start at only $14.99 and mobile plans start at just $39.99.
[01:18:38.280 --> 01:18:43.280] Plus, every month you pay your bill, FreedomTelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs.
[01:18:43.280 --> 01:18:52.280] Don't wait. Support the cause and get the highest quality and the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553.
[01:18:52.280 --> 01:19:14.280] That's 800-600-5553, FreedomTelephones.com, portable, private, perfect.
[01:19:22.280 --> 01:19:33.280] If I can't get everything I want, yeah, I'm gonna get a ranger.
[01:19:33.280 --> 01:19:44.280] If I can't get everything I need, yeah, I'm gonna get a ranger.
[01:19:44.280 --> 01:19:55.280] If I can't get everything I need, yeah, I'm gonna get a ranger.
[01:19:55.280 --> 01:20:02.280] If I can't get all these crazy ones, yeah, I'm gonna get a ranger.
[01:20:02.280 --> 01:20:07.280] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelk, Jefferson, and Greg.
[01:20:07.280 --> 01:20:14.280] We're on the radio and we're talking to Julius in Texas.
[01:20:14.280 --> 01:20:18.280] And we're talking about writing a criminal complaint.
[01:20:18.280 --> 01:20:29.280] I have for a while been working on how to explain this in a way that makes it relatively simple to write a good coaching complaint.
[01:20:29.280 --> 01:20:34.280] In a criminal complaint, you don't want to tell them the whole story.
[01:20:34.280 --> 01:20:46.280] You can write up the whole story as an affidavit, and I'm gonna suggest a way to do that.
[01:20:46.280 --> 01:20:49.280] Start out with a timeline.
[01:20:49.280 --> 01:20:52.280] This happened, this happened, this happened, this happened.
[01:20:52.280 --> 01:20:57.280] Absolutely no argumentation.
[01:20:57.280 --> 01:21:07.280] Just strictly what happened, and then take that timeline and copy it down and call it statement of factual accusation.
[01:21:07.280 --> 01:21:19.280] And then go down the timeline and tie the facts together to show how these actions constituted this crime.
[01:21:19.280 --> 01:21:29.280] Avoid any, try to avoid legal conclusions unless they're absolutely necessary.
[01:21:29.280 --> 01:21:40.280] The more of our own thought process we put into it, the more we'll tend to interfere with the thought process of our reader.
[01:21:40.280 --> 01:21:47.280] We want to construct our facts in a way that the reader will read the facts.
[01:21:47.280 --> 01:21:49.280] Now he knows where we're going.
[01:21:49.280 --> 01:22:01.280] So he read the facts and try to, because he knows where we're going, he will try to put these facts together in a way that goes to some criminal activity.
[01:22:01.280 --> 01:22:12.280] And if we structure our facts right, when we go in and start stitching the pieces together, we'll stitch it together the same way the reader did.
[01:22:12.280 --> 01:22:21.280] And then the reader will perceive that as this guy thinks like I do, he must be really smart.
[01:22:21.280 --> 01:22:34.280] If we put in a lot of argument that the reader would not necessarily readily agree with, then he's going to think we're an idiot and a chump because we don't think like he does.
[01:22:34.280 --> 01:22:36.280] I hope that makes sense.
[01:22:36.280 --> 01:22:51.280] And when I write a complaint, a complaint always runs in the name of the state. If you look on jurisprudence.com in the documents and research section under blanks, there'll be a blank criminal complaint.
[01:22:51.280 --> 01:22:57.280] Also, on the front, there is a reference to Cherokee County.
[01:22:57.280 --> 01:23:10.280] If you open that up and look at the complaint, there's a complaint document in there where I have a, I think, a 40 or 50 page statement.
[01:23:10.280 --> 01:23:14.280] Oh, I saw that, that affidavit that you wrote. Wonderful.
[01:23:14.280 --> 01:23:24.280] Okay. What I did was, if you look at it, I wrote each section where I complained about this person did this thing.
[01:23:24.280 --> 01:23:29.280] I wrote that so that it was independent of everything else.
[01:23:29.280 --> 01:23:44.280] And this was paragraph C. And on this day at this time, this person did this thing and his act had the effect of violating this statute.
[01:23:44.280 --> 01:23:57.280] And then I copied that out and dropped it into a complaint and called that complaint Exhibit C. So Exhibit C referenced paragraph C in the document.
[01:23:57.280 --> 01:24:01.280] And each complaint was executed that way.
[01:24:01.280 --> 01:24:06.280] And I arranged the complaint in the order that things happen.
[01:24:06.280 --> 01:24:15.280] So the idea was that a person could read this and it would be reasonable how one thing led to another.
[01:24:15.280 --> 01:24:20.280] And if you notice in there, there's not a lot of legal argumentation.
[01:24:20.280 --> 01:24:28.280] The argument that is in there is primarily done in terms of law.
[01:24:28.280 --> 01:24:31.280] The statute says this, he did this.
[01:24:31.280 --> 01:24:38.280] And this side matches the statute rather than me putting in any of my personal opinions.
[01:24:38.280 --> 01:24:40.280] Right.
[01:24:40.280 --> 01:24:41.280] Right.
[01:24:41.280 --> 01:24:46.280] Writing complaints of this nature, your personal opinions are absolutely taboo.
[01:24:46.280 --> 01:24:52.280] Now, it may be your personal opinion, but it needs to sound clinical.
[01:24:52.280 --> 01:25:02.280] It needs to sound like it is good, clean logic and not specious logic.
[01:25:02.280 --> 01:25:06.280] Specious logic is logic based on false premise.
[01:25:06.280 --> 01:25:11.280] So we have to make sure that each premise is clear.
[01:25:11.280 --> 01:25:21.280] And then when we go to the conclusion from the premises, we have to have stated our premises clear enough so that they will come to that conclusion
[01:25:21.280 --> 01:25:25.280] before we get to it.
[01:25:25.280 --> 01:25:30.280] We tried to get the reader to accept our position.
[01:25:30.280 --> 01:25:44.280] So instead of telling the reader what we want them to think, we structured what we're writing in a way that will get them to come to the conclusion we want them to
[01:25:44.280 --> 01:25:47.280] before we offer that conclusion.
[01:25:47.280 --> 01:25:49.280] I hope that makes sense.
[01:25:49.280 --> 01:25:51.280] Absolutely.
[01:25:51.280 --> 01:25:54.280] And the timeline is so important because you've painted a picture.
[01:25:54.280 --> 01:26:00.280] So now you give a good outline of what happened starting from A, B, C, and it's going down the steps.
[01:26:00.280 --> 01:26:02.280] Here's how it went.
[01:26:02.280 --> 01:26:17.280] Yeah, and absolutely nothing that's opinion, no pejoratives, no accusations, only pure fact.
[01:26:17.280 --> 01:26:26.280] If you put any accusation in there, the reader will almost certainly disagree with you as a matter of course.
[01:26:26.280 --> 01:26:27.280] I think.
[01:26:27.280 --> 01:26:30.280] So it has to be clean facts.
[01:26:30.280 --> 01:26:39.280] Now with that said, you don't have to tell every single fact that they don't expect you to.
[01:26:39.280 --> 01:26:46.280] They expect you to give them the facts that would lead to the position you're trying to bring them.
[01:26:46.280 --> 01:26:48.280] They expect that.
[01:26:48.280 --> 01:26:53.280] And the reader will look at it and he will look for the empty places.
[01:26:53.280 --> 01:27:04.280] So be careful what you put in so that you don't create questions in the mind of your reader that you don't immediately answer.
[01:27:04.280 --> 01:27:10.280] When you write something like this, you should always know what questions you're creating.
[01:27:10.280 --> 01:27:16.280] If anybody on here has ever had me ask him to read one of my documents, this is the first thing to tell them.
[01:27:16.280 --> 01:27:31.280] Tell me when I create a question in your mind that I did not already give you the answer to or immediately give you the answer after I created the question.
[01:27:31.280 --> 01:27:38.280] Because if I cause you to mentally trip to notice something.
[01:27:38.280 --> 01:27:40.280] Pieces don't fit here.
[01:27:40.280 --> 01:27:41.280] You're gone.
[01:27:41.280 --> 01:27:43.280] I've lost you.
[01:27:43.280 --> 01:27:49.280] And I'm not going to get you back until that question I've developed in your mind is answered.
[01:27:49.280 --> 01:27:52.280] And if I don't get it answered, I'm going to lose you.
[01:27:52.280 --> 01:27:54.280] No, go back.
[01:27:54.280 --> 01:27:57.280] This is an art form.
[01:27:57.280 --> 01:28:03.280] It's something I've been studying for a long time and I seldom get it right.
[01:28:03.280 --> 01:28:05.280] But I strive for it.
[01:28:05.280 --> 01:28:08.280] And I hope this helps us.
[01:28:08.280 --> 01:28:23.280] We need to be good at creating very clinical sounding, very cogent and reasonable sounding criminal accusations.
[01:28:23.280 --> 01:28:26.280] Rather we get them in front of a jury or not.
[01:28:26.280 --> 01:28:33.280] Grand jury or not is not as important as when the prosecutor reads it.
[01:28:33.280 --> 01:28:42.280] He reads it in a way that he thinks, I really don't want to have to give this to the grand jury.
[01:28:42.280 --> 01:28:45.280] That one probably have more effect.
[01:28:45.280 --> 01:28:54.280] If he thinks he's got someone coming after him or someone else there and this guy has got it together.
[01:28:54.280 --> 01:28:58.280] They are very afraid of grand juries because they never know what a grand jury will do.
[01:28:58.280 --> 01:29:04.280] If we give them something that a grand jury will work with, we will create a lot of politics.
[01:29:04.280 --> 01:29:07.280] Okay, I'm going to stop talking about juries.
[01:29:07.280 --> 01:29:09.280] No, that's absolutely great, Randy.
[01:29:09.280 --> 01:29:10.280] I mean, it's fabulous.
[01:29:10.280 --> 01:29:22.280] And also I look at it as it's kind of like a chess game because you've got to set your pieces up correctly right before you make that attack and you've got to develop your position.
[01:29:22.280 --> 01:29:24.280] It's all about position.
[01:29:24.280 --> 01:29:25.280] Exactly.
[01:29:25.280 --> 01:29:26.280] Coming from.
[01:29:26.280 --> 01:29:27.280] Exactly.
[01:29:27.280 --> 01:29:29.280] We've got that timeline together.
[01:29:29.280 --> 01:29:30.280] Thank you.
[01:29:30.280 --> 01:29:32.280] That's great.
[01:29:32.280 --> 01:29:33.280] Okay.
[01:29:33.280 --> 01:29:35.280] Did you have anything else for us, Julius?
[01:29:35.280 --> 01:29:40.280] No, that's it, Randy and Eddie and good-eyed and off to your next.
[01:29:40.280 --> 01:29:41.280] Okay.
[01:29:41.280 --> 01:29:42.280] Thank you, Julius.
[01:29:42.280 --> 01:29:43.280] Okay, Eric.
[01:29:43.280 --> 01:29:44.280] Thank you for holding on.
[01:29:44.280 --> 01:29:47.280] We will pick you up when we get back on the other side.
[01:29:47.280 --> 01:29:50.280] This is Randy Kellner, David Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[01:29:50.280 --> 01:29:51.280] We've got radio.
[01:29:51.280 --> 01:29:56.280] Our call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:29:56.280 --> 01:30:00.280] We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.280 --> 01:30:06.280] A noble lie, Oklahoma City 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[01:30:06.280 --> 01:30:10.280] Based on the damage patting to the building, but the government says it's impossible.
[01:30:10.280 --> 01:30:14.280] The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:30:14.280 --> 01:30:17.280] The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[01:30:17.280 --> 01:30:22.280] Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:22.280 --> 01:30:26.280] The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[01:30:26.280 --> 01:30:55.280] Expose the cover-up now at InnovaLive.com.
[01:30:56.280 --> 01:31:03.280] That's what the true intent of law really is.
[01:31:26.280 --> 01:31:48.280] Thank you.
[01:31:48.280 --> 01:31:58.280] Thank you.
[01:32:18.280 --> 01:32:36.280] Okay, we are back.
[01:32:36.280 --> 01:32:38.280] Thank you, Deputy Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[01:32:38.280 --> 01:32:40.280] We've got radio.
[01:32:40.280 --> 01:32:44.280] We're going to Eric in California.
[01:32:44.280 --> 01:32:47.280] Eric, what do you have for us today?
[01:32:47.280 --> 01:32:50.280] Oh, I got something to talk about from Georgia.
[01:32:50.280 --> 01:32:53.280] Oh, okay, I keep reading that.
[01:32:53.280 --> 01:32:56.280] That's okay, Randy learned a different alphabet in school.
[01:32:56.280 --> 01:32:59.280] They were carving it into stone tablets at the time.
[01:32:59.280 --> 01:33:01.280] No, I'm getting a stick too.
[01:33:01.280 --> 01:33:03.280] I mean, a cataract.
[01:33:03.280 --> 01:33:05.280] I didn't see the little crossy line.
[01:33:05.280 --> 01:33:10.280] Okay, so this is Hillbilly Eric.
[01:33:10.280 --> 01:33:11.280] Yes, sir.
[01:33:11.280 --> 01:33:16.280] Well, South Georgia, we ain't got no heels that year.
[01:33:16.280 --> 01:33:20.280] Hillbilly is a state of mind.
[01:33:20.280 --> 01:33:24.280] I know because I'm from a place called Scrouchhorn,
[01:33:24.280 --> 01:33:27.280] and it was right in the middle of the Coley gullies.
[01:33:27.280 --> 01:33:29.280] I was five years old before I knew a shoe.
[01:33:29.280 --> 01:33:32.280] It was something that you went on your foot,
[01:33:32.280 --> 01:33:35.280] and not just something that you used to throw at the dogs.
[01:33:35.280 --> 01:33:40.280] Yeah, Scrouchhorn was right next to Squathorn.
[01:33:40.280 --> 01:33:44.280] That really was the name of the place with Scrouchhorn.
[01:33:44.280 --> 01:33:47.280] Interesting place back there in the Tennessee Red Hills.
[01:33:47.280 --> 01:33:49.280] Okay, go ahead.
[01:33:49.280 --> 01:33:52.280] Yes, sir, it's good to talk to you all tonight.
[01:33:52.280 --> 01:33:54.280] I just have a couple of questions.
[01:33:54.280 --> 01:33:58.280] Like, I've been reading the criminal code of my state, Georgia,
[01:33:58.280 --> 01:34:01.280] and it seems like sometimes it contradicts itself.
[01:34:01.280 --> 01:34:05.280] Like, they say, you know, we have to take you before the judge.
[01:34:05.280 --> 01:34:07.280] I have to believe there's a commitment here.
[01:34:07.280 --> 01:34:09.280] And then they say later on that,
[01:34:09.280 --> 01:34:11.280] well, they have two 72 hours to do that.
[01:34:11.280 --> 01:34:14.280] Is that purposely confusing or am I reading it wrong?
[01:34:14.280 --> 01:34:19.280] Okay, what you're probably reading is the 72 hours
[01:34:19.280 --> 01:34:24.280] comes from a federal case.
[01:34:24.280 --> 01:34:26.280] What is it?
[01:34:26.280 --> 01:34:30.280] The city of California case.
[01:34:30.280 --> 01:34:33.280] Anyway, I'll think of the name of it in a second.
[01:34:33.280 --> 01:34:36.280] You get older, it takes longer for names to come up.
[01:34:36.280 --> 01:34:40.280] City of Riverside v. McLaughlin.
[01:34:40.280 --> 01:34:46.280] And what the federal law requires
[01:34:46.280 --> 01:34:54.280] and what the states almost completely imitate
[01:34:54.280 --> 01:34:59.280] is that a person who is arrested without a warrant
[01:34:59.280 --> 01:35:04.280] is to be taken directly to the nearest magistrate
[01:35:04.280 --> 01:35:07.280] without unnecessary delay.
[01:35:07.280 --> 01:35:13.280] But they do leave in an excusable delay.
[01:35:13.280 --> 01:35:17.280] A flyer of flood or natural catastrophe
[01:35:17.280 --> 01:35:22.280] or some other intervening emergency
[01:35:22.280 --> 01:35:28.280] that the officer had to respond to.
[01:35:28.280 --> 01:35:33.280] Other absent those and officers only
[01:35:33.280 --> 01:35:37.280] defense against an allegation of false imprisonment
[01:35:37.280 --> 01:35:40.280] for failure to timely take before a magistrate
[01:35:40.280 --> 01:35:45.280] is a showing of due diligence and due diligence effort to locate.
[01:35:45.280 --> 01:35:51.280] But what the courts have adjudicated is that
[01:35:51.280 --> 01:35:58.280] if an officer gets you to a magistrate within a certain time
[01:35:58.280 --> 01:36:02.280] and the case law says there shall be no set time limit,
[01:36:02.280 --> 01:36:04.280] or goes to the only,
[01:36:04.280 --> 01:36:08.280] that they can hold you up to 72 hours
[01:36:08.280 --> 01:36:12.280] according to City of Riverside v. McLaughlin,
[01:36:12.280 --> 01:36:19.280] and presumption is that the taking was timely.
[01:36:19.280 --> 01:36:23.280] It doesn't say they can hold you for 72 hours
[01:36:23.280 --> 01:36:25.280] without taking you to a magistrate.
[01:36:25.280 --> 01:36:30.280] It says that if it takes less than 72 hours,
[01:36:30.280 --> 01:36:34.280] then the presumption is that the taking was timely
[01:36:34.280 --> 01:36:40.280] unless the accused can show that
[01:36:40.280 --> 01:36:46.280] the officers could have gotten into a magistrate sooner.
[01:36:46.280 --> 01:36:51.280] And that would overcome the presumption.
[01:36:51.280 --> 01:36:53.280] Go ahead.
[01:36:53.280 --> 01:36:58.280] Does yours read in statute that they have 72 hours?
[01:36:58.280 --> 01:37:02.280] Yes, sir. It reads that at first it says without delay.
[01:37:02.280 --> 01:37:05.280] I mean, not that it was the most convenient and accessible,
[01:37:05.280 --> 01:37:10.280] and then later it reads on it says 72 hours.
[01:37:10.280 --> 01:37:14.280] You need to look at the context of the two.
[01:37:14.280 --> 01:37:19.280] What does it say before the 72 hours?
[01:37:19.280 --> 01:37:24.280] Well, it says the duty,
[01:37:24.280 --> 01:37:28.280] the brain person's arrest of the full judicial officer
[01:37:28.280 --> 01:37:30.280] within 72 hours,
[01:37:30.280 --> 01:37:33.280] notice to the accused of time and place,
[01:37:33.280 --> 01:37:36.280] commitment hearing, a failure to notify,
[01:37:36.280 --> 01:37:39.280] and it goes into the actual statute.
[01:37:39.280 --> 01:37:43.280] Okay. Here's where you need to go back and look at the case law.
[01:37:43.280 --> 01:37:45.280] Okay.
[01:37:45.280 --> 01:37:50.280] Okay. That says they have a duty to bring within 72 hours.
[01:37:50.280 --> 01:37:55.280] What you're undoubtedly going to find is case law
[01:37:55.280 --> 01:38:01.280] that's going to say you must take them directly to the magistrate.
[01:38:01.280 --> 01:38:06.280] But you can't be held for false imprisonment
[01:38:06.280 --> 01:38:10.280] if it takes 72 hours.
[01:38:10.280 --> 01:38:16.280] If you can show that there was reasonable cause for the delay.
[01:38:16.280 --> 01:38:24.280] And if it's over 72 hours, then it's presumed that the taking was untimely.
[01:38:24.280 --> 01:38:32.280] And there will be case law wherein the police will have ways of showing
[01:38:32.280 --> 01:38:37.280] that there was intervening circumstances like Katrina.
[01:38:37.280 --> 01:38:40.280] Katrina is a national disaster.
[01:38:40.280 --> 01:38:44.280] You've got major problems in New Orleans.
[01:38:44.280 --> 01:38:49.280] The police arrested a lot of people and held them over 72 hours.
[01:38:49.280 --> 01:38:54.280] And the courts will adjudicate that was reasonable.
[01:38:54.280 --> 01:38:59.280] Because it was an emergency, but it takes an emergency.
[01:38:59.280 --> 01:39:03.280] I'm almost certain that if you look at the case law,
[01:39:03.280 --> 01:39:09.280] that the case law is going to say because that says you have to be within 72 hours,
[01:39:09.280 --> 01:39:17.280] that does not mean you can hold someone as a matter of course for 71 hours.
[01:39:17.280 --> 01:39:22.280] That if you could have gotten them to a magistrate before the 72 hours
[01:39:22.280 --> 01:39:26.280] and you failed to do so, then it's still going to be false imprisonment.
[01:39:26.280 --> 01:39:32.280] This is pretty standard due process around the country.
[01:39:32.280 --> 01:39:39.280] And what is it in the case law that all courts are open, that the judge is on duty
[01:39:39.280 --> 01:39:42.280] like 24 hours, 10 days a week?
[01:39:42.280 --> 01:39:45.280] Is that actually the case law or is that just a matter of future?
[01:39:45.280 --> 01:39:49.280] No, that is not. I've never seen that in case law.
[01:39:49.280 --> 01:40:01.280] It is. I've never seen in law where it commands a judge to make himself available 24-7.
[01:40:01.280 --> 01:40:05.280] The judge certainly has that option.
[01:40:05.280 --> 01:40:12.280] And you could have law that says there must be a judge available.
[01:40:12.280 --> 01:40:19.280] And that would require a department or a county to make arrangements
[01:40:19.280 --> 01:40:25.280] so that of the judges they have, at least one is always available.
[01:40:25.280 --> 01:40:34.280] But I don't know of any statutory requirement for the judge himself to make himself available.
[01:40:34.280 --> 01:40:38.280] Well, is the problem of somebody's liberty such a deprivation
[01:40:38.280 --> 01:40:47.280] that it will require a judge to come forward and come to the court to see that's reasonable?
[01:40:47.280 --> 01:40:51.280] Yes, okay. There's a lot of case law on what's reasonable.
[01:40:51.280 --> 01:41:00.280] And essentially it is the duty of the magistrate, and all judges are magistrates,
[01:41:00.280 --> 01:41:06.280] and what magistrate goes to is the duty to hold an examining trial.
[01:41:06.280 --> 01:41:15.280] When someone's brought before a magistrate on an on-site offense where they're arrested without a warrant,
[01:41:15.280 --> 01:41:21.280] they must be brought before a magistrate so that the magistrate can hold an examining trial
[01:41:21.280 --> 01:41:28.280] and determine whether the person should be held to answer for the accusation or release of his liberty.
[01:41:28.280 --> 01:41:37.280] If a person is arrested with an existing warrant, the person is to be brought before the nearest magistrate
[01:41:37.280 --> 01:41:42.280] so the magistrate can look at the warrant and determine if the warrant is valid.
[01:41:42.280 --> 01:41:48.280] So in either case, whether without a warrant, you must be taken to the magistrate
[01:41:48.280 --> 01:41:55.280] or as soon as it's reasonably within a reasonable time.
[01:41:55.280 --> 01:42:01.280] And then the magistrate, the whole point of a magistrate is to be available.
[01:42:01.280 --> 01:42:05.280] That's why we have J.P.'s stationed around the county.
[01:42:05.280 --> 01:42:08.280] That's why they're not all in the county seat.
[01:42:08.280 --> 01:42:16.280] Because before we had this effective fast communication, if you're 20 miles from the county seat,
[01:42:16.280 --> 01:42:20.280] it could take a day and a half to get there on horseback.
[01:42:20.280 --> 01:42:29.280] So they stationed magistrates and J.P.'s around the county so that one would be available in case someone was arrested.
[01:42:29.280 --> 01:42:35.280] And that's why they made mayors magistrates, because they wanted one close by no matter where you were arrested,
[01:42:35.280 --> 01:42:39.280] so you could be taken directly to there.
[01:42:39.280 --> 01:42:47.280] And so the purpose of them being a magistrate, that was their duty when somebody's brought to them.
[01:42:47.280 --> 01:42:54.280] But if it's the case law he said, if it's after 11 at night or before 8 in the morning,
[01:42:54.280 --> 01:43:04.280] that that's not a reasonable time unless the magistrate has specifically authorized it.
[01:43:04.280 --> 01:43:13.280] And would a judicial officer, would that be like a magistrate also, or would that be...
[01:43:13.280 --> 01:43:17.280] Okay, magistrates, all judges are magistrates.
[01:43:17.280 --> 01:43:20.280] And mayors are magistrates.
[01:43:20.280 --> 01:43:24.280] And in Texas we have one that says we're quarters of magistrates.
[01:43:24.280 --> 01:43:26.280] I don't know what that is.
[01:43:26.280 --> 01:43:29.280] Surely it doesn't apply to the court reporter.
[01:43:29.280 --> 01:43:34.280] But we've taken it, so I think Eddie's addressed that.
[01:43:34.280 --> 01:43:36.280] That applies to municipal judges.
[01:43:36.280 --> 01:43:39.280] I don't know how it gets there, but that's the implication.
[01:43:39.280 --> 01:43:43.280] Okay, we are running short of time.
[01:43:43.280 --> 01:43:47.280] Do you have any more questions for us there?
[01:43:47.280 --> 01:43:49.280] Thank you very much.
[01:43:49.280 --> 01:43:51.280] Okay, thank you very much.
[01:43:51.280 --> 01:43:55.280] This is Randy Kelton, David Stephen, Lady Craig, we'll go radio.
[01:43:55.280 --> 01:43:59.280] Robert, Mike, I see you there, Eric...
[01:43:59.280 --> 01:44:03.280] It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM,
[01:44:03.280 --> 01:44:06.280] but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy,
[01:44:06.280 --> 01:44:09.280] and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:44:09.280 --> 01:44:12.280] Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[01:44:12.280 --> 01:44:13.280] Brave New Books?
[01:44:13.280 --> 01:44:16.280] Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for
[01:44:16.280 --> 01:44:20.280] by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[01:44:20.280 --> 01:44:24.280] They even stock Interfood, Burkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:44:24.280 --> 01:44:26.280] There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:44:26.280 --> 01:44:28.280] Go check it out for yourself.
[01:44:28.280 --> 01:44:32.280] It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:44:32.280 --> 01:44:35.280] Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:44:35.280 --> 01:44:38.280] Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking
[01:44:38.280 --> 01:44:41.280] for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility
[01:44:41.280 --> 01:44:43.280] just behind the bookstore.
[01:44:43.280 --> 01:44:47.280] It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:44:47.280 --> 01:44:51.280] Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[01:44:51.280 --> 01:44:55.280] So get them a call at 512-480-2503
[01:44:55.280 --> 01:45:22.280] or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:45:25.280 --> 01:45:27.280] And now you can, too.
[01:45:27.280 --> 01:45:30.280] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:30.280 --> 01:45:33.280] with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.280 --> 01:45:35.280] Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[01:45:35.280 --> 01:45:38.280] you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:38.280 --> 01:45:40.280] about the principles and practices
[01:45:40.280 --> 01:45:42.280] that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.280 --> 01:45:47.280] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:47.280 --> 01:45:51.280] forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.280 --> 01:45:56.280] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:56.280 --> 01:46:22.280] or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:26.280 --> 01:46:42.280] All right, folks, welcome back to rule of law radio.
[01:46:42.280 --> 01:46:45.280] We are in our last segment of the Friday night
[01:46:45.280 --> 01:46:47.280] four-hour info marathon,
[01:46:47.280 --> 01:46:49.280] and we have Robert and Mike left to get through.
[01:46:49.280 --> 01:46:52.280] Let's go to Robert and see how far we can get.
[01:46:52.280 --> 01:46:54.280] All right, Robert, what can we do for you?
[01:46:54.280 --> 01:46:57.280] I hear you have a question about dog catchers.
[01:46:57.280 --> 01:46:59.280] Okay, yeah, I called back.
[01:46:59.280 --> 01:47:01.280] I called a while back, but y'all ran out of time,
[01:47:01.280 --> 01:47:03.280] and I'm up against your time limit here.
[01:47:03.280 --> 01:47:06.280] But, yeah, I had a dog catcher come on my property
[01:47:06.280 --> 01:47:10.280] and came inside my back gate, started searching around,
[01:47:10.280 --> 01:47:14.280] and he had asked my wife prior to that, you know,
[01:47:14.280 --> 01:47:17.280] he needed to see the papers on the dogs.
[01:47:17.280 --> 01:47:19.280] And she said, well, hold on, let me get my husband.
[01:47:19.280 --> 01:47:21.280] And I went out there and I saw him, you know,
[01:47:21.280 --> 01:47:23.280] searching in the backyard, and he just walked out the backyard,
[01:47:23.280 --> 01:47:26.280] and I asked him, you know, what he wanted,
[01:47:26.280 --> 01:47:32.280] and he said, I got a complaint filed on your dogs,
[01:47:32.280 --> 01:47:34.280] and, you know, and so I'm here to,
[01:47:34.280 --> 01:47:36.280] I need to see your papers on your dogs,
[01:47:36.280 --> 01:47:38.280] and I asked him, well, if you have a complaint,
[01:47:38.280 --> 01:47:40.280] do you have a warrant to be searching my property?
[01:47:40.280 --> 01:47:42.280] And he said, no, I don't have a warrant.
[01:47:42.280 --> 01:47:43.280] I said, well, then if you don't have a warrant,
[01:47:43.280 --> 01:47:46.280] you need to leave, and he wouldn't leave.
[01:47:46.280 --> 01:47:49.280] And so, you know, he refused to leave.
[01:47:49.280 --> 01:47:51.280] I kept asking him to leave.
[01:47:51.280 --> 01:47:53.280] You know, you're trespassing.
[01:47:53.280 --> 01:47:56.280] I had trespassing, no trespassing signs up with the,
[01:47:56.280 --> 01:47:57.280] you know, title A.
[01:47:57.280 --> 01:48:00.280] Okay, then he was criminally trespassing.
[01:48:00.280 --> 01:48:02.280] Exactly, because I already had asked him to leave.
[01:48:02.280 --> 01:48:05.280] But anyway, I called the sheriff's department to remove him.
[01:48:05.280 --> 01:48:08.280] The sheriff's department basically sided with him,
[01:48:08.280 --> 01:48:11.280] and another police officer came on the property,
[01:48:11.280 --> 01:48:16.280] and I told the police officer that he did not have the permission
[01:48:16.280 --> 01:48:18.280] to step on my property because I did not call him.
[01:48:18.280 --> 01:48:21.280] I called the peace officer, the sheriff's department,
[01:48:21.280 --> 01:48:24.280] to remove the animal control officer.
[01:48:24.280 --> 01:48:27.280] And, you know, he came on there anyway asking me for my ID.
[01:48:27.280 --> 01:48:29.280] I said, sir, you're on my property,
[01:48:29.280 --> 01:48:31.280] and I'm not going to show you any ID
[01:48:31.280 --> 01:48:32.280] because you have no business here,
[01:48:32.280 --> 01:48:35.280] and you have this guy conducting legal search.
[01:48:35.280 --> 01:48:38.280] He's criminally trespassing, and I want him removed.
[01:48:38.280 --> 01:48:42.280] And the dog catcher asked the policeman,
[01:48:42.280 --> 01:48:44.280] well, what's the problem?
[01:48:44.280 --> 01:48:45.280] He says he won't show me the papers,
[01:48:45.280 --> 01:48:47.280] and he says, well, you have to show him the papers.
[01:48:47.280 --> 01:48:49.280] I don't have to show you anything.
[01:48:49.280 --> 01:48:52.280] I have the right to not show you any evidence against myself,
[01:48:52.280 --> 01:48:54.280] and I'm not going to do so.
[01:48:54.280 --> 01:48:58.280] So anyway, the sheriff's department,
[01:48:58.280 --> 01:49:00.280] who I called to, you know, the sheriff's deputy,
[01:49:00.280 --> 01:49:03.280] who I called to remove the criminal trespasser off,
[01:49:03.280 --> 01:49:04.280] said, well, you know what?
[01:49:04.280 --> 01:49:06.280] Why don't we just go get a bunch of rifles,
[01:49:06.280 --> 01:49:08.280] come back and kill all the animals?
[01:49:08.280 --> 01:49:09.280] Quote, unquote.
[01:49:09.280 --> 01:49:12.280] My little son heard that, and he got scared
[01:49:12.280 --> 01:49:14.280] because he thought that all the cops
[01:49:14.280 --> 01:49:16.280] were going to come back and start shooting.
[01:49:16.280 --> 01:49:21.280] And so anyway, you know, he said that what I was saying was bull,
[01:49:21.280 --> 01:49:25.280] and he said he told the animal control officer
[01:49:25.280 --> 01:49:29.280] he was leaving, you know, just send him citations to the mail.
[01:49:29.280 --> 01:49:31.280] Okay, I get the citations in the mail,
[01:49:31.280 --> 01:49:34.280] and in the meantime, you know,
[01:49:34.280 --> 01:49:37.280] I'm like trying to find out all about this stuff, you know, and...
[01:49:37.280 --> 01:49:39.280] What did he charge you with on the citations?
[01:49:39.280 --> 01:49:42.280] Failure to provide rabies vaccines.
[01:49:42.280 --> 01:49:45.280] I beat it, but the thing is that I wanted to ask you
[01:49:45.280 --> 01:49:50.280] about something else, because when I was on my way to court,
[01:49:50.280 --> 01:49:54.280] or a municipal court, I said, you know what?
[01:49:54.280 --> 01:49:56.280] Let me go check with, you know, the clerk
[01:49:56.280 --> 01:49:58.280] and see if the animal control guy,
[01:49:58.280 --> 01:50:00.280] being that he's issuing a court summons,
[01:50:00.280 --> 01:50:04.280] whether he has an oath of office, you know, statement on file.
[01:50:04.280 --> 01:50:07.280] I went to the county, and of course, they don't have it there.
[01:50:07.280 --> 01:50:10.280] It was city, so I went to the city, you know,
[01:50:10.280 --> 01:50:15.280] and asked, you know, the secretary there for, you know,
[01:50:15.280 --> 01:50:17.280] a proof of oath of office, and when I went back,
[01:50:17.280 --> 01:50:20.280] she told me that he did not, in fact,
[01:50:20.280 --> 01:50:23.280] did not have an oath of office statement on file,
[01:50:23.280 --> 01:50:26.280] and then the city manager came and told me, basically,
[01:50:26.280 --> 01:50:29.280] to get out that I wasn't going to get anything.
[01:50:29.280 --> 01:50:32.280] Okay, now, do you have everybody's name?
[01:50:32.280 --> 01:50:34.280] Yeah, I do.
[01:50:34.280 --> 01:50:36.280] Do you have a date and time when this began
[01:50:36.280 --> 01:50:39.280] and every event we're talking about to the entire occurrence?
[01:50:39.280 --> 01:50:41.280] Yeah, and see what there's more.
[01:50:41.280 --> 01:50:43.280] It's like a big mess.
[01:50:43.280 --> 01:50:46.280] So, anyway, I ended up going to court
[01:50:46.280 --> 01:50:48.280] when I get to the municipal court, and I tell the judge,
[01:50:48.280 --> 01:50:50.280] I say, Judge, I'm here on special appearance only,
[01:50:50.280 --> 01:50:53.280] but, you know, as a neighbor, I'm trying to,
[01:50:53.280 --> 01:50:55.280] I'm going to show you, I do indeed have my shot records,
[01:50:55.280 --> 01:50:58.280] but I want to be left alone, and I don't want any more harassment.
[01:50:58.280 --> 01:51:00.280] You guys didn't have any jurisdiction.
[01:51:00.280 --> 01:51:02.280] You violated, you know, my rights anyway,
[01:51:02.280 --> 01:51:07.280] and she, you know, she says, well, all you have to do
[01:51:07.280 --> 01:51:10.280] is show me your shot records and this thing will be dismissed,
[01:51:10.280 --> 01:51:12.280] so I really had them on the counter.
[01:51:12.280 --> 01:51:15.280] I was recording this, you know, when I went to the court,
[01:51:15.280 --> 01:51:17.280] and then I said, well, there it is,
[01:51:17.280 --> 01:51:19.280] and she goes, well, I have to call and see whether the,
[01:51:19.280 --> 01:51:22.280] you know, the animals listed on the citations were the animals.
[01:51:22.280 --> 01:51:25.280] I said, well, I only owned Chihuahua.
[01:51:25.280 --> 01:51:27.280] Okay, Robert, let me ask you a question.
[01:51:27.280 --> 01:51:28.280] Yeah.
[01:51:28.280 --> 01:51:33.280] If you did not have to provide the cop or the control officer
[01:51:33.280 --> 01:51:36.280] with the evidence that they planned to use against you,
[01:51:36.280 --> 01:51:41.280] what in the world makes you think you have to give it to a judge at trial?
[01:51:41.280 --> 01:51:44.280] Well, I didn't give it as evidence, like I said.
[01:51:44.280 --> 01:51:46.280] Yes, you did.
[01:51:46.280 --> 01:51:49.280] It's the same thing you would do with a driver's license.
[01:51:49.280 --> 01:51:51.280] The moment you produce that license,
[01:51:51.280 --> 01:51:54.280] you're agreeing that you're engaging in an activity
[01:51:54.280 --> 01:51:56.280] that requires you to have it.
[01:51:56.280 --> 01:51:57.280] Okay, I understand that,
[01:51:57.280 --> 01:52:00.280] but see that this is where I got to explain something to you now
[01:52:00.280 --> 01:52:01.280] at this point.
[01:52:01.280 --> 01:52:04.280] It was this last summer, not this summer, last summer,
[01:52:04.280 --> 01:52:08.280] and that's when my summer project was to get into the Constitution
[01:52:08.280 --> 01:52:10.280] and listen into you guys.
[01:52:10.280 --> 01:52:12.280] Of course, I didn't know that at the time.
[01:52:12.280 --> 01:52:13.280] Okay.
[01:52:13.280 --> 01:52:15.280] But at any rate, you know,
[01:52:15.280 --> 01:52:18.280] given everything that happened until this point,
[01:52:18.280 --> 01:52:19.280] you know, an oath of office or anything,
[01:52:19.280 --> 01:52:23.280] I started finding out stuff.
[01:52:23.280 --> 01:52:26.280] When I get to the court and all that,
[01:52:26.280 --> 01:52:31.280] and she puts the original citations or I put my citations on there,
[01:52:31.280 --> 01:52:36.280] you know, she's pulling the one she has, she slapped hers on there.
[01:52:36.280 --> 01:52:44.280] She pulls up another citation for the same offenses from another officer.
[01:52:44.280 --> 01:52:45.280] And I'm like, what's that?
[01:52:45.280 --> 01:52:49.280] She said, well, you wanted somebody who was qualified to write a ticket,
[01:52:49.280 --> 01:52:52.280] so we got an officer who was qualified to write a ticket,
[01:52:52.280 --> 01:52:57.280] and you wrote a ticket for you not having rabies vaccines on your dogs.
[01:52:57.280 --> 01:52:59.280] I said, ma'am, you can't do that.
[01:52:59.280 --> 01:53:01.280] She goes, well, you said you wanted it.
[01:53:01.280 --> 01:53:04.280] I said, I've never said such a thing, you know, and I never did.
[01:53:04.280 --> 01:53:06.280] You know, I just, that's where an oath of office,
[01:53:06.280 --> 01:53:09.280] and she had got, I guess she talked to the city manager or whatever.
[01:53:09.280 --> 01:53:10.280] Who did?
[01:53:10.280 --> 01:53:12.280] The judge.
[01:53:12.280 --> 01:53:14.280] The judge produced the citations?
[01:53:14.280 --> 01:53:22.280] The judge produced the citations when I was at the desk in the municipal court,
[01:53:22.280 --> 01:53:25.280] and you know, this is a small town in San Adel,
[01:53:25.280 --> 01:53:30.280] and she just took it, I saw her take it off of another desk and she put it right in front of me,
[01:53:30.280 --> 01:53:33.280] and she told me that that was, here, this is the citation,
[01:53:33.280 --> 01:53:37.280] because I told her, ma'am, this citation isn't invalid
[01:53:37.280 --> 01:53:39.280] because this guy didn't even have an oath of office.
[01:53:39.280 --> 01:53:43.280] And, you know, he didn't have any authority to write this,
[01:53:43.280 --> 01:53:47.280] and then that's when she pulled the other ticket and slapped it on there.
[01:53:47.280 --> 01:53:51.280] And, you know, she said, well, you wanted someone with authority to write that,
[01:53:51.280 --> 01:53:52.280] and didn't you?
[01:53:52.280 --> 01:53:54.280] And I said, I never asked her anything.
[01:53:54.280 --> 01:53:57.280] And so my understanding is, you know, what is it?
[01:53:57.280 --> 01:54:00.280] Rule 602, rule, you know.
[01:54:00.280 --> 01:54:03.280] Okay, hold on, hold on.
[01:54:03.280 --> 01:54:07.280] He did not need an oath of office to write the citation.
[01:54:07.280 --> 01:54:09.280] Is the citation is a court summons?
[01:54:09.280 --> 01:54:10.280] Is it not?
[01:54:10.280 --> 01:54:12.280] No, it's not a summons.
[01:54:12.280 --> 01:54:15.280] It's a pretend summons.
[01:54:15.280 --> 01:54:16.280] Okay.
[01:54:16.280 --> 01:54:17.280] I'm sorry, you're right.
[01:54:17.280 --> 01:54:21.280] I'm thinking he wouldn't need it to write a complaint.
[01:54:21.280 --> 01:54:23.280] He wouldn't need it to write a citation.
[01:54:23.280 --> 01:54:24.280] Yeah, because it's a summons.
[01:54:24.280 --> 01:54:27.280] I mean, it says so on the head of the ticket.
[01:54:27.280 --> 01:54:28.280] But, you know...
[01:54:28.280 --> 01:54:29.280] Wait a minute.
[01:54:29.280 --> 01:54:40.280] How did the judge know that you wanted a complaint by someone authorized to sign the ticket?
[01:54:40.280 --> 01:54:41.280] I have no idea.
[01:54:41.280 --> 01:54:43.280] All I know is when I got there...
[01:54:43.280 --> 01:54:44.280] Okay.
[01:54:44.280 --> 01:54:45.280] Hold on.
[01:54:45.280 --> 01:54:49.280] This is an important question.
[01:54:49.280 --> 01:54:55.280] If the judge found out when you weren't there, that's called ex parte communication,
[01:54:55.280 --> 01:54:57.280] and that is forbidden.
[01:54:57.280 --> 01:54:59.280] Yeah, well...
[01:54:59.280 --> 01:55:01.280] That's crime on the part of the judge.
[01:55:01.280 --> 01:55:06.280] And you need to go back to this judge and give this judge a criminal complaint citation
[01:55:06.280 --> 01:55:08.280] against the officer who wrote the ticket.
[01:55:08.280 --> 01:55:09.280] Yeah.
[01:55:09.280 --> 01:55:12.280] How did the officer know you had two dogs?
[01:55:12.280 --> 01:55:13.280] Yeah.
[01:55:13.280 --> 01:55:17.280] Well, see, what gets me is that after all they've done on this...
[01:55:17.280 --> 01:55:19.280] Wait, didn't answer my question.
[01:55:19.280 --> 01:55:20.280] Okay, go ahead.
[01:55:20.280 --> 01:55:25.280] He accused you of not having rabies on these two dogs.
[01:55:25.280 --> 01:55:26.280] How did he know?
[01:55:26.280 --> 01:55:29.280] Did he examine the dogs while he was there?
[01:55:29.280 --> 01:55:30.280] No, he did not.
[01:55:30.280 --> 01:55:31.280] Nobody did.
[01:55:31.280 --> 01:55:33.280] They didn't see any dogs there.
[01:55:33.280 --> 01:55:36.280] You know, and that goes back to the beginning of my story.
[01:55:36.280 --> 01:55:43.280] He said he had a complaint filed on me, on my dogs, you know, on me that I had been letting
[01:55:43.280 --> 01:55:47.280] my dogs run around and that they didn't have rabies, I think.
[01:55:47.280 --> 01:55:50.280] Did you get a copy of the complaint?
[01:55:50.280 --> 01:55:51.280] Well, that's what I asked him.
[01:55:51.280 --> 01:55:53.280] I said, may I see the complaint, please?
[01:55:53.280 --> 01:55:55.280] And he said, oh, well, you need backtracking.
[01:55:55.280 --> 01:55:57.280] He goes, oh, well, I don't have a complaint.
[01:55:57.280 --> 01:55:59.280] Somebody just called on the telephone.
[01:55:59.280 --> 01:56:03.280] So to me, that's, you know, he's lying to me in my face.
[01:56:03.280 --> 01:56:06.280] You really need to go after this officer, aggravated perjury.
[01:56:06.280 --> 01:56:08.280] You need to go after everybody.
[01:56:08.280 --> 01:56:15.280] You know, giving me that other ticket and, you know, they just, the other day they harassed
[01:56:15.280 --> 01:56:20.280] me on, well, I call it harassment because they were talking about my automobiles being on,
[01:56:20.280 --> 01:56:22.280] you know, my property.
[01:56:22.280 --> 01:56:26.280] And, you know, I have my no trespassing signs.
[01:56:26.280 --> 01:56:28.280] Just take a tarp.
[01:56:28.280 --> 01:56:31.280] If you have an automobile that doesn't operate, throw a tarp over it.
[01:56:31.280 --> 01:56:32.280] It's not there.
[01:56:32.280 --> 01:56:33.280] I just don't have them tagged.
[01:56:33.280 --> 01:56:36.280] So they assumed that they don't work, you know.
[01:56:36.280 --> 01:56:39.280] And so I'm like, well, those are my private automobiles.
[01:56:39.280 --> 01:56:40.280] They're not motor vehicles.
[01:56:40.280 --> 01:56:44.280] And I don't know why you're coming on my property telling me I have to tag and license on my
[01:56:44.280 --> 01:56:47.280] private property when they're not motor vehicles.
[01:56:47.280 --> 01:56:51.280] And then one of the officers, you know, after reading my no trespassing signs, you know,
[01:56:51.280 --> 01:56:57.280] with my, you know, warnings on, you know, the federal code, you know, the section 18 and
[01:56:57.280 --> 01:57:00.280] section 42, you know, he's reading that.
[01:57:00.280 --> 01:57:03.280] He goes, oh, I guess that doesn't apply to me because I heard him through the door and
[01:57:03.280 --> 01:57:04.280] they start laughing.
[01:57:04.280 --> 01:57:07.280] Why do he ask me to start my vehicles?
[01:57:07.280 --> 01:57:09.280] I said, I don't have to do nothing for you.
[01:57:09.280 --> 01:57:12.280] And then he goes, well, let me see your ID.
[01:57:12.280 --> 01:57:16.280] I said, well, why would you want to see my identification?
[01:57:16.280 --> 01:57:21.280] And then he puts his hand on his gun and he looks me straight in the eye and he goes,
[01:57:21.280 --> 01:57:24.280] do you have a warrant out for your arrest?
[01:57:24.280 --> 01:57:26.280] And I said, well, you tell me, you're the policeman.
[01:57:26.280 --> 01:57:29.280] Shouldn't you know if I have a warrant out on my arrest?
[01:57:29.280 --> 01:57:30.280] Okay, hold on.
[01:57:30.280 --> 01:57:32.280] You just, you went on a long story.
[01:57:32.280 --> 01:57:37.280] If an officer puts his hand on his pistol, I consider that aggravated assault.
[01:57:37.280 --> 01:57:41.280] First thing I ask him is that pistol loaded.
[01:57:41.280 --> 01:57:43.280] And he'll say, yes, it is.
[01:57:43.280 --> 01:57:46.280] Are you fixin' to pull that pistol on me?
[01:57:46.280 --> 01:57:47.280] Yeah.
[01:57:47.280 --> 01:57:48.280] Well, I mean, it's a...
[01:57:48.280 --> 01:57:50.280] That tends to change their attitude even fast.
[01:57:50.280 --> 01:57:51.280] Yeah.
[01:57:51.280 --> 01:57:56.280] And I wish I could talk to you more about this, but if I could take this to court and sue
[01:57:56.280 --> 01:57:59.280] them or somehow sue them for this stuff, I mean, I'd be happy...
[01:57:59.280 --> 01:58:00.280] You can.
[01:58:00.280 --> 01:58:01.280] You can.
[01:58:01.280 --> 01:58:02.280] You can.
[01:58:02.280 --> 01:58:03.280] I'll get, I'll get...
[01:58:03.280 --> 01:58:06.280] Try calling in, try calling in earlier next week.
[01:58:06.280 --> 01:58:07.280] Yeah.
[01:58:07.280 --> 01:58:09.280] We are out of time right now.
[01:58:09.280 --> 01:58:11.280] Well, thank you guys for what you do.
[01:58:11.280 --> 01:58:12.280] Okay.
[01:58:12.280 --> 01:58:14.280] Call in earlier next week and we'll get to you.
[01:58:14.280 --> 01:58:15.280] This is Randy Kelton.
[01:58:15.280 --> 01:58:17.280] We have Stephen Zeddy Craig.
[01:58:17.280 --> 01:58:18.280] We have the radio.
[01:58:18.280 --> 01:58:26.280] We'll be back Monday with Eddie and Deborah on our, on their Monday night traffic show.
[01:58:26.280 --> 01:58:35.080] of us to be here Thursday, 8 to 10, and then next Friday night, 8 to midnight. Call us,
[01:58:35.080 --> 01:58:40.760] ask us questions, stop the chumps if you can, we'd like to get hard questions. Thank you
[01:58:40.760 --> 01:58:50.280] all for listening, and good night. Good night, folks.
[01:58:50.280 --> 01:58:56.520] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.520 --> 01:59:02.000] Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.000 --> 01:59:07.560] what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of
[01:59:07.560 --> 01:59:16.600] life. Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:16.600 --> 01:59:23.560] or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over
[01:59:23.560 --> 01:59:30.240] 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.240 --> 01:59:34.760] This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament
[01:59:34.760 --> 01:59:46.520] Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at
[01:59:46.520 --> 01:59:47.520] bfa.org.
[01:59:47.520 --> 01:59:58.960] Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.