ROL_2012-07-20_16k_Hr1-2.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  When they're plain touched down in America, two British tourists were greeted by the feds, handcuffed, jailed and deported.
[00:08.000 --> 00:11.000]  They're crying? I'll give you a hint. It has to do with Twitter.
[00:11.000 --> 00:15.000]  Under Dr. Cameron Albrecht, I'll have them not-so-funny details in a moment.
[00:15.000 --> 00:21.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:21.000 --> 00:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.000 --> 00:31.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.000 --> 00:34.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.000 --> 00:41.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[00:41.000 --> 01:10.000]  Let's start over with StartPage.
[01:12.000 --> 01:16.000]  And dig up Marilyn Monroe's grave on Hollywood Boulevard.
[01:16.000 --> 01:19.000]  Humor apparently is no defense with Homeland Security.
[01:19.000 --> 01:24.000]  After spending 12 hours detained alongside drug dealers, the Brits were deported.
[01:24.000 --> 01:34.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:34.000 --> 01:41.000]  Children conceived through fertility treatments are more likely to suffer serious birth defects than babies conceived naturally.
[01:41.000 --> 01:48.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and in a moment I'll have details on a groundbreaking study on the risks of fertility treatments.
[01:48.000 --> 01:54.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:54.000 --> 01:59.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:59.000 --> 02:04.000]  Protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:04.000 --> 02:06.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[02:06.000 --> 02:13.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[02:13.000 --> 02:40.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:43.000 --> 02:49.000]  The effects tripled when mothers use chlomaphine citrate, a drug that induces ovulation.
[02:49.000 --> 02:56.000]  With millions of babies born each year through fertility treatments, it's about time doctors began telling their patients about these risks.
[02:56.000 --> 03:03.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[03:03.000 --> 03:13.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com.
[03:33.000 --> 03:57.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[03:57.000 --> 04:04.000]  Folks, good evening. This is the Friday night rule of law radio show. This is our four hour info marathon night.
[04:04.000 --> 04:09.000]  This is Eddie Craig with Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens is off the night.
[04:09.000 --> 04:17.000]  It is July 20th, 2012, the year of the rabid public servant.
[04:17.000 --> 04:28.000]  Folks, it is time to start kicking butt and taking names and when that doesn't work, then we start need to carve in those names into something else if you know what I mean.
[04:28.000 --> 04:34.000]  Randy, you said there was something you want to talk about the night dealing with a challenge to jurisdiction issue you were thinking about.
[04:34.000 --> 04:52.000]  Well, no, I wasn't thinking about it actually. I hadn't had one and I finally had an issue where we had someone get power of attorney for these people who had no capacity to represent themselves.
[04:52.000 --> 05:02.000]  They barely spoke the language. So he got a power of attorney and he got a warranty deed, followed the warranty deed in the county record.
[05:02.000 --> 05:13.000]  And then he went into the court with a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction in a JP court in an unlawful detainer hearing.
[05:13.000 --> 05:25.000]  And the judge rather arrogantly lectured him on the fact that the only thing that they were there to consider was rule of civil procedure 746.
[05:25.000 --> 05:42.000]  And he told me about it and I said, well, is that a fact check? So this just said the piece has decided that the only thing that counts in her courtroom are the rules of civil procedure.
[05:42.000 --> 05:55.000]  So we'll see about that. And this worked out well for me because I got somebody else to do it. I like it a lot better that way.
[05:55.000 --> 06:02.000]  So I prepared a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction.
[06:02.000 --> 06:14.000]  And Lawrence filed it with the court and the day before he had went to the court and the court was just a bit arrogant.
[06:14.000 --> 06:25.000]  Well, he went to the court today and filed the challenge to jurisdiction.
[06:25.000 --> 06:47.000]  He filed a motion for reconsideration. And in the motion for reconsideration, we laid out the issues for, we actually did a kind of a minor brief on subject matter jurisdiction.
[06:47.000 --> 07:03.000]  And I'm trying to pull it up here and I'll show you what we gave the court. And surprise, surprise, after she read that, she wasn't near as arrogant.
[07:03.000 --> 07:12.000]  And she didn't even send the clerk out to talk to him. She came out and talked to him herself, if you can imagine that.
[07:12.000 --> 07:19.000]  I'm going to read a bit of it to you.
[07:19.000 --> 07:46.000]  And then I have a case law. The law provides that what state and federal jurisdiction has been challenged. It must be proven.
[07:46.000 --> 07:57.000]  This is what she missed. She thought that just because she believed she had subject matter jurisdiction, she could move ahead.
[07:57.000 --> 08:07.000]  But what subject matter jurisdiction is challenged, even if the court has subject matter jurisdiction, they have to prove it up.
[08:07.000 --> 08:20.000]  And the court can't prove it up. It has to be proved by pleadings from the other side. In this case, it was the plaintiff because this is an unlawful container here.
[08:20.000 --> 08:29.000]  The court in the instant matter simply assumed jurisdiction without consideration of the challenge to its subject matter jurisdiction.
[08:29.000 --> 08:39.000]  I apologize for the redundancy, but that's not her word. Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed. It must be proved to exist.
[08:39.000 --> 08:50.000]  Stuck the medical zammers, blah blah blah. Court must prove on the record all jurisdictional facts related to the jurisdiction asserted.
[08:50.000 --> 09:00.000]  Court in the instant case did not hear the pleading, but rather acted in violation of its ministerial duty to apply the law to the facts.
[09:00.000 --> 09:10.000]  It ignored the challenge timely filed before it and assumed it had jurisdiction simply because someone filed an action.
[09:10.000 --> 09:28.000]  There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction.
[09:28.000 --> 09:36.000]  Defendant moves the court to reconsider its rule in the above matter as a rule and nullity as a matter of law.
[09:36.000 --> 09:49.000]  The universal principle as old as the law is the proceedings of a court without jurisdiction are nullity and its judgments therein without effect, either on person or property.
[09:49.000 --> 09:52.000]  No one would be revealed.
[09:52.000 --> 10:04.000]  Jurisdiction is fundamental and a judgment rendered by a court that does not have jurisdiction to hear is void ab initio.
[10:04.000 --> 10:19.000]  In the above action, where the court is without subject matter jurisdiction, the court acts in its personal capacity with the intent of denying defendant in the due course of the laws.
[10:19.000 --> 10:31.000]  Such an act is subsequently proven to constitute not only a civil tort against the defendant, but an act intended to deny defendant's right to petition the court for redress of grievance.
[10:31.000 --> 10:47.000]  While the court is acting under color or pretense of law and not actual authority, said that behavior is prohibited to all citizens, but more specifically to those acting in an alleged official capacity.
[10:47.000 --> 10:55.000]  And here is my favorite case quote of all time.
[10:55.000 --> 11:13.000]  This is screws the US. Take the case of a local officer who persists in enforcing a type of ordinance which the court has held invalid as violative of the guarantees of free speech and freedom of worship, or local official continues to select
[11:13.000 --> 11:29.000]  juries in the matter which flies in the teeth of decisions of the court. If those acts are done willfully, how can the officer possibly claim that he had no fair warning that his acts were prohibited by the statute?
[11:29.000 --> 11:49.000]  He violates the statute not really because he has a bad purpose, but because the action defiance of announced rules of law. He who defies the decision interpreting the Constitution knows precisely what he is doing.
[11:49.000 --> 12:01.000]  The same, he hardly may be heard to say that he knew not what he did. Of course, willful conduct cannot be made, cannot make definite that which is indefinite.
[12:01.000 --> 12:21.000]  And in this case, we had sheriff and two deputies 1945 Mississippi drinking in a bar upset at a black guy decided to go arresting bartender tries to talk him out of it. They won't be dissuaded. They wind up beating the guy to death on the courthouse steps.
[12:21.000 --> 12:34.000]  They're prosecuted in the state, shooting the state and then they're shooting the Fed. And they quite foul said we didn't have notice we could sue in the Fed, be sued in the Fed. That's what this scope was to notice.
[12:34.000 --> 12:58.000]  But willful violators of constitutional requirements, which have been defined, certainly are in no position to say they had no adequate advance notice that they would be visited with punishment. When they act willfully in the sense in which we use the word, they act in open defiance or in reckless disregard of the
[12:58.000 --> 13:11.000]  constitution requirement, which has been made specific and definite. When they are convicted for so acting, they are not punished for violating an unknowable something.
[13:11.000 --> 13:18.000]  That is absolutely my favorite quote of all the case, though I've ever looked at.
[13:18.000 --> 13:44.000]  What we told the judge is you're screwed. Well, we, in the conclusion in the prayer, we asked the judge to reconsider. Well, she told Lawrence that in a matter of a unlawful detainer hearing that he could not ask for a vote, he could not file a motion to reconsider.
[13:44.000 --> 13:56.000]  Any of you have heard of such a thing? No, I can't say that I have any time the judge is doing something that violates law and you're required to give that judge the opportunity to fix their mistake.
[13:56.000 --> 14:24.000]  That's the way I read it. I didn't see any exclusion for that in chapter 45 or in the rules of civil procedure. And she stated out of her own mouth that this court was held under the rules of civil procedure, specifically rule 746, but she can't just pull one out of the procedure rules and ignore the rest.
[14:24.000 --> 14:33.000]  But anyway, she read this document and her attitude changed considerably.
[14:33.000 --> 14:56.000]  So when Lawrence got this, he skyped to be back and he said, wow, that's pretty hard. I said, well, a little bit. So he was going to the court and he says, make sure I would stay close in case I got a collect call.
[14:56.000 --> 15:08.000]  And I skyped him back. Collect call? Lawrence who? But he didn't get arrested.
[15:08.000 --> 15:33.000]  It turns out that when you call down their throats and you do it with chapter inverse, they tend to pay attention, I think, especially to prosaic litigants because the judge is looking at this prosaic litigant and knows that he is out of her control.
[15:33.000 --> 15:49.000]  So he doesn't have a bar card she can get pulled. He's not going to be bringing other clients before her that she can screw just by exercising her discretion in future cases.
[15:49.000 --> 16:09.000]  That he's in there representing issues that are important to him and he's willing to fight her for it. And he's willing to take her on personally. This is what those judges need to know about us prosaic litigants, that we will come for your throat and we'll care if you are the big bad judge.
[16:09.000 --> 16:31.000]  So I was real pleased with the response to this today. Since he filed this, there's been no action by the other side. And frankly, this challenge of subject matter jurisdiction was based on an analysis of the court record.
[16:31.000 --> 16:44.000]  And in this case, the court record was absolutely a horrendous mess. So they all knew it. Okay, this is Randy Kaufman, David Stevens and Craig.
[16:44.000 --> 17:00.000]  We have long radio. Our calling number is 522-646-1984. We're going to break. We'll be right back on the other side. Give us a call except for our info marathon.
[17:00.000 --> 17:08.000]  Capital Coin & Bullion is a family owned business built on the promise to bring you affordable pricing on all coin and bullion products.
[17:08.000 --> 17:17.000]  In addition to coins and bullions, we now offer storeable freeze dried foods produced by Augustin Farms, ammunition at 10% above wholesale prices,
[17:17.000 --> 17:32.000]  Berkey water products, gift certificates and our silver pool, a new way to guarantee silver by prepaying at a locked price. We can even help you set up a metals IRA account. Call us at 512-646-6440 for more details.
[17:32.000 --> 17:47.000]  As always, we buy, sell and trade precious metals, give appraisals and cater to those with all sizes of coin collections. We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half a mile north of Canig next to the Ikiban Sushi and Genie Car Watch.
[17:47.000 --> 18:00.000]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2. Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440 and say you heard about us on rule of law radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[18:00.000 --> 18:09.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:21.000]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:34.000]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:34.000 --> 18:41.000]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 19:00.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:11.000 --> 19:21.000]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[19:41.000 --> 19:58.000]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[20:11.000 --> 20:31.000]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[20:31.000 --> 20:49.000]  All right folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. Call in number 512-646-1984. This is our Friday night four hour info marathon. Right now we have no callers on the board and we need some, so get busy with the dialing fingers.
[20:49.000 --> 21:09.000]  Okay, there is something I really wanted to talk to you that leads from that. In doing what we've been doing for quite a while, you know, had quite a bit of experience figuring out a lot of things don't work.
[21:09.000 --> 21:24.000]  And I can tell you a whole lot of things not to do. And I'm beginning to move in a direction of things that are far more likely to bring positive outcomes and that have been bringing positive outcomes.
[21:24.000 --> 21:47.000]  Like this issue today. This issue today wasn't about attacking a judge. This issue was about politics. And politics, you know, I'm not talking about politics in the term of this presidential election.
[21:47.000 --> 22:06.000]  I'm talking about politics more in terms of office politics, local politics, politics between the actors who are in this play that we're dealing with.
[22:06.000 --> 22:26.000]  How they interact with one another, what pressures are on them. If we understand the pressures moving around the courthouse and how the personalities interact, we can better determine how to gauge our behavior.
[22:26.000 --> 22:52.000]  And one of the things I know about JPs is whether it's true or not an action is true. The State Commission on Judicial Conduct will almost never discipline a county or district judge or a judge of a superior court.
[22:52.000 --> 23:03.000]  County and district courts are considered superior courts. The courts of record and they are loaded over by learning council.
[23:03.000 --> 23:22.000]  JPs are sometimes learned in council, but not necessarily. JP courts and municipal courts are considered inferior courts. They're not necessarily courts of record. Some are, but not necessarily. And they're not necessarily ruled over by learning council.
[23:22.000 --> 23:45.000]  So the JP municipal judges believe that the State Commission on Judicial Conduct will crucify them in order to give the impression that they're doing their job without having to go after one of the superior court judges.
[23:45.000 --> 23:58.000]  And in studying the decisions by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, they are 100% correct in that consideration.
[23:58.000 --> 24:09.000]  The last batch I looked through went about four years back and they had disciplined two superior court judges.
[24:09.000 --> 24:28.000]  One of them was convicted of a felony and the other one was retiring or something of that nature. And they moved on the action to remove him from office because he's incapable.
[24:28.000 --> 24:35.000]  Outrageously incapable and was retiring anyway.
[24:35.000 --> 24:44.000]  Two in the last four years. Now they have disciplined a lot of JPs and municipal judges.
[24:44.000 --> 24:55.000]  It is clear that the State Commission on Judicial Conduct uses inferior court judges as sacrificial lamps.
[24:55.000 --> 25:09.000]  Now that may not be fair, but that's how it works in the world I live in. And it's nice to know that this particular judge was absolutely certain of that.
[25:09.000 --> 25:33.000]  And when she read this challenge to subject manager restriction where we made some not so veiled warnings, they were fixed to come after you personally. That's why at the end, in the conclusion, I referenced the judge acting outside of scope.
[25:33.000 --> 25:43.000]  And if the judge has any knowledge of her job, she'll know exactly what I meant by scope.
[25:43.000 --> 25:56.000]  A public official who has either absolute or derivative immunity, so long as he is acting within the scope of his authority.
[25:56.000 --> 26:07.000]  And the reference in there to outside scope is a reference to the likelihood of us suing the judge personally.
[26:07.000 --> 26:15.000]  And that goes to politics. This is pressures that are beyond the judicial pressures.
[26:15.000 --> 26:28.000]  Now she's looking at us taking her bass boat or her hubby's bass boat. And she's looking at it in serious embarrassment. Now no lawyer would do that to her.
[26:28.000 --> 26:51.000]  It's part of why they hate process because lawyers they can control and we actually had a judge in court trying to force someone to take court appointing counsel and because the judge told it. Actually, I was in Sydney, Australia, my first day there.
[26:51.000 --> 26:59.000]  And there were two local pro se litigants that were in court that day.
[26:59.000 --> 27:06.000]  And the first one just crawled down that judge's throat. I'm surprised he didn't go to jail.
[27:06.000 --> 27:31.000]  The second one, the judge was trying to convince him to accept counsel. And he was ejected to it because he didn't trust the lawyers. And the judge came right out and told him in court that he wanted him to accept counsel because he could control counsel.
[27:31.000 --> 27:47.000]  And he couldn't control the pro se litigant. And the judge only said that because he was getting so frustrated with this character that all of his weedling and his pressure and his threats didn't do any good.
[27:47.000 --> 28:01.000]  God was not impressed. And he just assumed the guy's just the ignorant pro se's too stupid to know any better. Well, he wasn't too stupid to know any better. He was smart enough to know precisely what the judge couldn't really couldn't do.
[28:01.000 --> 28:19.000]  So pro se's carry with them a certain amount of politics. And what you do sticks, if you hammer one good, it sticks. I just talked to my county attorney recently.
[28:19.000 --> 28:32.000]  And we had a rather lengthy conversation. I wanted to talk to him about one issue. But he seemed to be in a rather talkative mood.
[28:32.000 --> 28:52.000]  And he said that he goes to seminars and conferences for prosecutors. And he said, you know, Mr. Kelton, you're a rather common topic of conversations. I said, ooh, he said a good thing.
[28:52.000 --> 29:07.000]  He said, well, it's not a bad thing. He said everywhere he goes, in Texas, people ask him when they find out where he's from, they ask him if he knows me.
[29:07.000 --> 29:17.000]  And yeah, he does know me. When he ran for office, I was in the courthouse one day. And he saw me in the hall and he said, hello, Mr. Kelton.
[29:17.000 --> 29:27.000]  I said, hello, Mr. Stanton. He said, you know, I run it for county attorney. I said, yeah, I know. He said, now you remember Mr. Kelton.
[29:27.000 --> 29:42.000]  I went to school with your kids. I know where you live. He made a reference to the radio station. He didn't know that I didn't consider him important enough to care one way or another.
[29:42.000 --> 29:52.000]  But he was concerned. He was concerned that I would put out bad press about it. And that's good. We want him that way.
[29:52.000 --> 29:59.000]  And other people that I had hammered were concerned. Okay, hang on. We'll be right back.
[29:59.000 --> 30:07.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:07.000 --> 30:12.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:12.000 --> 30:15.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:15.000 --> 30:18.000]  And thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[30:18.000 --> 30:19.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:19.000 --> 30:20.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:20.000 --> 30:22.000]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[30:22.000 --> 30:23.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:23.000 --> 30:24.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:24.000 --> 30:27.000]  We're Americans. And we deserve the truth.
[30:27.000 --> 30:38.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:57.000 --> 31:07.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy.
[31:07.000 --> 31:10.000]  And neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[31:10.000 --> 31:13.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[31:13.000 --> 31:14.000]  Brave New Books?
[31:14.000 --> 31:21.000]  Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Albert Griffin.
[31:21.000 --> 31:25.000]  They even stock inner food, burkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[31:25.000 --> 31:28.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[31:28.000 --> 31:29.000]  Go check it out for yourself.
[31:29.000 --> 31:33.000]  It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[31:33.000 --> 31:37.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[31:37.000 --> 31:44.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[31:44.000 --> 31:48.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[31:48.000 --> 31:53.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[31:53.000 --> 32:00.000]  So get them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[32:04.000 --> 32:11.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[32:11.000 --> 32:25.000]  Yeah, I got that one rent, and I gonna solve them, to the head of government them, prosecute them.
[32:25.000 --> 32:27.000]  Okay.
[32:29.000 --> 32:31.000]  All set.
[32:31.000 --> 32:42.000]  Okay, this is Randy Kelkow, deputy student at the Brave New York Radio.
[32:42.000 --> 32:49.000]  And we're talking about politics, and I kind of got a little bit off topic.
[32:49.000 --> 33:06.000]  Of late, the last two or three years, I've been paying a whole lot more attention about what actually goes on in the courthouse, who has influence on who, and how that influence is spread around.
[33:06.000 --> 33:17.000]  And one of the things that had been clear is that if you go in and you take these guys on, they are not accustomed to it.
[33:17.000 --> 33:26.000]  And that's what Mr. Stanton, the county attorney talked about, is that these guys didn't like it that I took them on.
[33:26.000 --> 33:33.000]  And they asked him if I was crazy, and he said, yeah, absolutely I was.
[33:33.000 --> 33:39.000]  But he did go on to tell them that I was not hard to deal with at all.
[33:39.000 --> 33:42.000]  He said, I have to just listen to him.
[33:42.000 --> 33:49.000]  As you try to pull that arrogant prosecutor routine on him, you're going to get a fight.
[33:49.000 --> 33:55.000]  And that's exactly what they need to think, that they're going to get trouble they don't need.
[33:55.000 --> 34:05.000]  And all they have to do not to have trouble is conduct themselves with professional dignity.
[34:05.000 --> 34:16.000]  And both the possibly county and district attorneys in Wise County now, I have a good personal relationship with them.
[34:16.000 --> 34:20.000]  I think we have two really good prosecutors.
[34:20.000 --> 34:32.000]  And I very much like to get stating on the air because he's kind of an arrogant individual, but he does have a very good sense of justice.
[34:32.000 --> 34:42.000]  And I'd like to get him on the air so you hear who he is, where he lives, what's important to him, because that way you're not.
[34:42.000 --> 34:50.000]  Once you kind of feel like you have been able to take his measure, you won't be quite so afraid.
[34:50.000 --> 34:58.000]  Especially if you understand the politics affecting his position.
[34:58.000 --> 35:09.000]  The primary political factor affecting his position is that big stack of cases he's got sitting on his desk.
[35:09.000 --> 35:16.000]  Whatever the law may say, whatever justice may dictate, he has caseload he has to get rid of.
[35:16.000 --> 35:18.000]  And so does the judge.
[35:18.000 --> 35:21.000]  These are primary factors.
[35:21.000 --> 35:24.000]  When you delay a case, they don't like it.
[35:24.000 --> 35:28.000]  That's more work they have to do, more time they have to spend.
[35:28.000 --> 35:33.000]  They want this case adjudicated quickly and efficiently.
[35:33.000 --> 35:43.000]  And in doing what we're doing, I'm looking at ways of moving through the courts more quickly and easily.
[35:43.000 --> 35:56.000]  And in the foreclosure area, we're looking at going to the clerks and getting the clerk to go to the judge and get these documents rendered for it.
[35:56.000 --> 36:03.000]  And we can come into a quiet title hearing and it just doesn't have much work to do.
[36:03.000 --> 36:16.000]  He's got res judicata, he's got a ruling by a different court that he can't get around or he's got a ruling that he made himself in another context.
[36:16.000 --> 36:20.000]  That he can't come back in this context to change.
[36:20.000 --> 36:23.000]  So, you know, it's pretty dead bang.
[36:23.000 --> 36:25.000]  Justice documents avoid.
[36:25.000 --> 36:27.000]  You can't get past it.
[36:27.000 --> 36:32.000]  You're out of here to make life easier for the courts.
[36:32.000 --> 36:37.000]  We make less problems for the court.
[36:37.000 --> 36:45.000]  And in doing this, we have to figure out how to nullify the effect of these law firms.
[36:45.000 --> 36:52.000]  These law firms with lots of money and lots of backing that tend to intimidate the judges.
[36:52.000 --> 36:54.000]  So, we have ways of coming after them.
[36:54.000 --> 36:57.000]  That's why we bar grieve them so quickly.
[36:57.000 --> 37:08.000]  And I'm looking at using the criminal tool as a political tool.
[37:08.000 --> 37:09.000]  We don't care.
[37:09.000 --> 37:11.000]  We don't want them prosecuted.
[37:11.000 --> 37:19.000]  Because they get prosecuted, then they have to fight us in order to protect themselves from the criminal charge.
[37:19.000 --> 37:25.000]  So, they have to prove that they didn't do anything criminal against us so that they don't want to go into jail.
[37:25.000 --> 37:28.000]  So, they'll fight us a lot harder.
[37:28.000 --> 37:33.000]  All we want the prosecutor to do is wave at them.
[37:33.000 --> 37:38.000]  They fight them and give them a reason to come to us to make the whole thing go away.
[37:38.000 --> 37:42.000]  Everything is politics.
[37:42.000 --> 37:45.000]  The law is the law and justice is justice.
[37:45.000 --> 37:49.000]  But in the real world, it's all political.
[37:49.000 --> 37:50.000]  Okay.
[37:50.000 --> 37:52.000]  That's all I'm going to say on that topic.
[37:52.000 --> 37:56.000]  Now we're going to go to John in Texas.
[37:56.000 --> 37:57.000]  Hello, John.
[37:57.000 --> 37:59.000]  What do you have for us today?
[37:59.000 --> 38:00.000]  How are you?
[38:00.000 --> 38:03.000]  I want to ask you something.
[38:03.000 --> 38:05.000]  Stay with me now.
[38:05.000 --> 38:13.000]  33 years ago, I used to farm 2,235 acres.
[38:13.000 --> 38:20.000]  I had a loan in Fort Worth, Tarrant County.
[38:20.000 --> 38:28.000]  Well, about a year and a half later, I got a notice that they were going to foreclose on me.
[38:28.000 --> 38:35.000]  Well, about two days after the foreclosure, I called the banker.
[38:35.000 --> 38:36.000]  I said, did you foreclose?
[38:36.000 --> 38:37.000]  He said yes.
[38:37.000 --> 38:38.000]  And said, well, who bought it?
[38:38.000 --> 38:41.000]  And the ballast kind of stuff.
[38:41.000 --> 38:49.000]  Well, I went through kind of a deep depression that was in March of 79.
[38:49.000 --> 38:57.000]  And then coming back to about April of 1990, my mother passed away.
[38:57.000 --> 39:03.000]  Well, I was going through some of the papers, and I found out that that property that I
[39:03.000 --> 39:09.000]  foreclosed on, there's 2,235 acres, it was scattered in Parker and Tarrant County and
[39:09.000 --> 39:10.000]  Johnson County.
[39:10.000 --> 39:14.000]  I found out I was not foreclosed on.
[39:14.000 --> 39:19.000]  My sister got a power of attorney from my mother, and I don't understand about all this that
[39:19.000 --> 39:25.000]  was done, but it was sold to some of my relatives.
[39:25.000 --> 39:35.000]  Well, after my mother died, my sister and I, we sued each other for four years.
[39:35.000 --> 39:39.000]  And she won, went all the way to Supreme Court.
[39:39.000 --> 39:44.000]  I did not have an attorney.
[39:44.000 --> 39:52.000]  At the time, this was 90, at the time, no attorney would want to represent me.
[39:52.000 --> 39:57.000]  And the reason they didn't want to represent me, there's a racetrack that's outside of
[39:57.000 --> 39:58.000]  Fort Worth.
[39:58.000 --> 40:02.000]  I owned the water and sewer easements that it was sitting on.
[40:02.000 --> 40:04.000]  And I had threats on my life.
[40:04.000 --> 40:10.000]  I had to leave the country for about four months if people really knew what was going on with
[40:10.000 --> 40:14.000]  that racetrack business in the state of Texas, they probably wouldn't have race in the state
[40:14.000 --> 40:16.000]  of Texas.
[40:16.000 --> 40:20.000]  Well, that happened.
[40:20.000 --> 40:28.000]  Here a couple of months ago, I found out that a lot of that forged stuff that happened 33
[40:28.000 --> 40:32.000]  years ago, it was actually a forgery.
[40:32.000 --> 40:35.000]  In these documents, there's about 12 of them.
[40:35.000 --> 40:38.000]  The people that bought it had loans on it, did a fine on it.
[40:38.000 --> 40:44.000]  But in that track, it had a sand and gravel deed that's worth millions.
[40:44.000 --> 40:50.000]  And I've been a land man oil and gas for like 38 years, I've been real estate and I understand
[40:50.000 --> 40:52.000]  a lot of the law.
[40:52.000 --> 40:56.000]  In my opinion, forgeries, forgeries are a little bit different than fraud.
[40:56.000 --> 41:03.000]  Fraud's got a clock on it, but on forgery, if it's forged in the documents, in the deed
[41:03.000 --> 41:06.000]  records, they're born abedicio.
[41:06.000 --> 41:11.000]  Well, fraud doesn't specifically have a statute of limitations.
[41:11.000 --> 41:15.000]  And forgery is a form of fraud.
[41:15.000 --> 41:22.000]  Yeah, but what he's saying is, if a document is forged, it's forged.
[41:22.000 --> 41:23.000]  Period.
[41:23.000 --> 41:26.000]  A put never goes away.
[41:26.000 --> 41:29.000]  That's a very good consideration.
[41:29.000 --> 41:35.000]  Fraud, five years after you discover the clock runs out.
[41:35.000 --> 41:39.000]  Yes, I just realized this.
[41:39.000 --> 41:40.000]  Okay, hold on.
[41:40.000 --> 41:43.000]  Are these documents filed in the county record?
[41:43.000 --> 41:45.000]  Yes, they are.
[41:45.000 --> 41:49.000]  Can you prove that the signatures are forged?
[41:49.000 --> 41:51.000]  Yes.
[41:51.000 --> 41:58.000]  Now then, they also, in the first paragraph of the legal description, there's exactly
[41:58.000 --> 42:06.000]  25 words that were added to it that covered some more land.
[42:06.000 --> 42:10.000]  This is really, really wild.
[42:10.000 --> 42:21.000]  There is a title company that closed this, and the attorney actually forged the legal
[42:21.000 --> 42:22.000]  description.
[42:22.000 --> 42:29.000]  Okay, so the legal description of the property doesn't match?
[42:29.000 --> 42:30.000]  That's correct.
[42:30.000 --> 42:47.000]  Okay, go to the Texas government code and read 51.109.
[42:47.000 --> 42:55.000]  51.109, you put together a good presentation.
[42:55.000 --> 43:01.000]  Take that in a letter with points and authorities.
[43:01.000 --> 43:03.000]  Don't do it yourself.
[43:03.000 --> 43:07.000]  Get a lawyer to write it up for you.
[43:07.000 --> 43:09.000]  Send it to the clerk.
[43:09.000 --> 43:14.000]  The clerk is required within two days to give it to the district judge.
[43:14.000 --> 43:16.000]  Is that 51.903?
[43:16.000 --> 43:18.000]  51, I'm sorry.
[43:18.000 --> 43:19.000]  No, 901.
[43:19.000 --> 43:21.000]  901.
[43:21.000 --> 43:24.000]  903 is different.
[43:24.000 --> 43:27.000]  901, you get the clerk to do it.
[43:27.000 --> 43:28.000]  Okay.
[43:28.000 --> 43:30.000]  So it's between the clerk and the judge.
[43:30.000 --> 43:32.000]  You're not in the middle of it.
[43:32.000 --> 43:35.000]  So you don't wind up with, say, bias.
[43:35.000 --> 43:36.000]  Okay.
[43:36.000 --> 43:37.000]  Hang on.
[43:37.000 --> 43:39.000]  We will pick this up on the other side.
[43:39.000 --> 43:40.000]  Okay.
[43:40.000 --> 43:42.000]  This is Randy Kelsen, Deb.
[43:42.000 --> 43:44.000]  Steven Z. Craig with the radio.
[43:44.000 --> 43:49.000]  Our call in number 512-646-1984.
[43:49.000 --> 43:50.000]  Give us a call.
[43:50.000 --> 43:51.000]  Good in line.
[43:51.000 --> 43:53.000]  This is our four-hour info marathon.
[43:53.000 --> 43:58.000]  You've got another hour, two hours and 15 minutes.
[43:58.000 --> 44:27.000]  Let's read it.
[44:28.000 --> 44:46.000]  The ATF initially denied these claims and now variously claim that one of their agents was in a free-falling elevator, which has been disproven, or that they'd been in an all-night stick out, or that they'd been at a golf tournament.
[44:46.000 --> 44:56.000]  As they try to sort out their lies, all we want to know is, did the ATF receive a warning, and if so, why did they not pass it on to others in the mobile system?
[44:56.000 --> 45:01.000]  For more information, go to okcfoundandtruth.com.
[45:26.000 --> 45:28.000]  And now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 46:02.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:23.000 --> 46:30.000]  Yes, always I must be careful what I'm wishing for.
[46:30.000 --> 46:35.000]  When I'm hungry, I like to know just what I'm fishing for.
[46:35.000 --> 46:41.000]  I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton.
[46:41.000 --> 46:47.000]  I'm just here making my living, pushing buttons.
[46:47.000 --> 46:53.000]  I get my message out of anyone and shout in distance.
[46:53.000 --> 47:00.000]  We're back, we're talking to John in Texas.
[47:00.000 --> 47:07.000]  Okay John, go ahead, you're going somewhere, I interrupted you before you got here.
[47:07.000 --> 47:15.000]  The closing that tech plays with the title company, it goes on a little farther at that closing.
[47:15.000 --> 47:23.000]  The attorney that did the closing and as a notary is a public servant, you know,
[47:23.000 --> 47:32.000]  but he sent that forged document to my bank to get a release and it was signed by a notary.
[47:32.000 --> 47:35.000]  And there's two other documents in that same closing.
[47:35.000 --> 47:38.000]  There's a release of lien, there's a deed, and the deed's trust.
[47:38.000 --> 47:44.000]  He personally notarized that forgery with a certificate and seal.
[47:44.000 --> 47:47.000]  That means he's lying under oath.
[47:47.000 --> 47:58.000]  There's a case law, Sheffield in the state, 1957, where you cannot aid in a bet somebody that's a notary to sign a forgery.
[47:58.000 --> 48:00.000]  That means you're involved also.
[48:00.000 --> 48:06.000]  That means that instrument is automatic and I use the word automatic forgery.
[48:06.000 --> 48:14.000]  You cannot file a forged document knowing that it's forged and he forged it by saying to my attorney,
[48:14.000 --> 48:23.000]  excuse me, my bank, banker, as well as he specifically did the deed and the deed of trust.
[48:23.000 --> 48:28.000]  And he cannot file a forgery in the deed records.
[48:28.000 --> 48:33.000]  He also wrote a title policy on it, $877.76.
[48:33.000 --> 48:36.000]  Well, there's another possibility here too, John.
[48:36.000 --> 48:43.000]  If you actually called the bank and asked them if they had foreclosed and they said yes,
[48:43.000 --> 48:52.000]  then that would mean the bank is privy to what was going on because they would have to know no actual foreclosure ever occurred.
[48:52.000 --> 48:55.000]  That bank has gone down.
[48:55.000 --> 49:04.000]  Well, that part's not surprising, but the people that were in it are still legally liable for the fraud they helped to perpetrate.
[49:04.000 --> 49:07.000]  Okay, that's interesting.
[49:07.000 --> 49:13.000]  They're liable in their individual capacity, not just their professional capacity.
[49:13.000 --> 49:21.000]  A corporation is a person, but that particular person can't commit a crime.
[49:21.000 --> 49:34.000]  It takes a living soul to do that part and the living soul who does commits the crime in the name of the corporation is absolutely responsible.
[49:34.000 --> 49:39.000]  I would very much like to indict these people.
[49:39.000 --> 49:41.000]  Can that be done?
[49:41.000 --> 49:43.000]  No, absolutely.
[49:43.000 --> 49:48.000]  That may be a good way to go about this.
[49:48.000 --> 49:52.000]  What county? You said it's in Parker.
[49:52.000 --> 49:55.000]  Well, these are separate properties in different counties.
[49:55.000 --> 49:57.000]  Yeah, they're separate.
[49:57.000 --> 50:01.000]  Okay, so they committed the acts in each county.
[50:01.000 --> 50:05.000]  Okay, they got a release at my bank in Tarrant County.
[50:05.000 --> 50:10.000]  The properties are located in Parker County.
[50:10.000 --> 50:13.000]  And anyway, that's where I'm at.
[50:13.000 --> 50:20.000]  That's interesting. How did they get anything in Tarrant County when the properties were in Parker County?
[50:20.000 --> 50:30.000]  The bank along with the money in Parker were the ones in Parker would not.
[50:30.000 --> 50:37.000]  I had some assets to put in with it and there's some property that was coming to me on inheritance.
[50:37.000 --> 50:42.000]  It's a valuable piece of property.
[50:42.000 --> 50:49.000]  For 26 years, I've been removing sand and grout off of it and since about 12 years, it's only gas.
[50:49.000 --> 50:55.000]  It's about two and a half million to five million a year.
[50:55.000 --> 50:58.000]  And it's well worth taking after.
[50:58.000 --> 51:07.000]  It's way too complex to finish up here, but we might talk about it off the air.
[51:07.000 --> 51:17.000]  It has a lot of issues and the grand jury may be a good first avenue for raising these issues.
[51:17.000 --> 51:22.000]  There's a man told me one time, there's 254 ways to practice along the state of Texas.
[51:22.000 --> 51:24.000]  I didn't know what he meant.
[51:24.000 --> 51:28.000]  He's an XDA in Weatherford.
[51:28.000 --> 51:32.000]  There's things you can do in one county, you can't do in the other.
[51:32.000 --> 51:38.000]  I've got my doubts if they would want these people indicted.
[51:38.000 --> 51:42.000]  Well, they may not have any option.
[51:42.000 --> 51:49.000]  The problem with indictment is you don't always have an option.
[51:49.000 --> 51:57.000]  And that's why we use the procedure to go around the prosecutor because prosecutor is a very, very political.
[51:57.000 --> 51:59.000]  Yes, I know.
[51:59.000 --> 52:06.000]  So we run a routine on him.
[52:06.000 --> 52:12.000]  And I owe the Parker County Attorney one anyway since I lead an Open Records Act.
[52:12.000 --> 52:16.000]  I just had that time to pursue him for it.
[52:16.000 --> 52:23.000]  Well, when I told you on the Warren Surrey easements that went under that race track, the state of Texas gave me a CCN,
[52:23.000 --> 52:29.000]  certificate necessity or whatever it is with watering surrey easements.
[52:29.000 --> 52:32.000]  It's called CCN, certificate need necessity.
[52:32.000 --> 52:33.000]  I think it is.
[52:33.000 --> 52:35.000]  The state of Texas gave that to me.
[52:35.000 --> 52:40.000]  Well, on the race track, the race track had a permit for racing.
[52:40.000 --> 52:42.000]  I wanted my money out of that.
[52:42.000 --> 52:43.000]  I didn't have any partners.
[52:43.000 --> 52:45.000]  I didn't owe anybody on it.
[52:45.000 --> 52:47.000]  And there's a conflict there.
[52:47.000 --> 52:54.000]  Anyway, I had to leave the country for four months because there's some people from out of state that had an interest in it.
[52:54.000 --> 52:58.000]  And they let me know that right fast.
[52:58.000 --> 53:02.000]  Okay, that I can help you with, especially not here on the air.
[53:02.000 --> 53:04.000]  Well, that's already over with anyway.
[53:04.000 --> 53:09.000]  Well, I guess the primary purpose here is to ask us a question.
[53:09.000 --> 53:14.000]  Okay, what is your issue?
[53:14.000 --> 53:16.000]  What do you want us to address for you?
[53:16.000 --> 53:21.000]  I'd like to know what it would take to indict the mechanics of it.
[53:21.000 --> 53:30.000]  Well, the mechanics is, you know, you'd have to, I would, before I moved ahead, I would want to see the whole picture.
[53:30.000 --> 53:31.000]  Okay.
[53:31.000 --> 53:34.000]  Do you play chess?
[53:34.000 --> 53:35.000]  No.
[53:35.000 --> 53:38.000]  Learned.
[53:38.000 --> 53:39.000]  This is chess.
[53:39.000 --> 53:41.000]  This is not checkers.
[53:41.000 --> 53:42.000]  Okay.
[53:42.000 --> 53:47.000]  In checkers, you set your pieces out there right in front of everybody.
[53:47.000 --> 53:54.000]  In chess, you have pieces out there, but it's not always clear what they're doing.
[53:54.000 --> 54:06.000]  And in chess, the most important moves are your pawn moves, or your preparatory moves, setting yourself up for what you actually want to do.
[54:06.000 --> 54:12.000]  You don't ever want to bring your queen out until you have your pawns in place to protect her.
[54:12.000 --> 54:31.000]  So here, you want to look at all the parameters, then formulate a plan for generating the most political pressure you can.
[54:31.000 --> 54:45.000]  The idea of getting an indictment, I mean, that may be personally satisfying, but what is your intended outcome?
[54:45.000 --> 54:51.000]  At the end of the day, what would you like to achieve by the process?
[54:51.000 --> 54:55.000]  I want my land back, and I want the money that was removed from it.
[54:55.000 --> 54:58.000]  Okay.
[54:58.000 --> 55:03.000]  You need to write that down and hold it as a talisman.
[55:03.000 --> 55:12.000]  Because when you start into this, you're going to be talking about having the country because you thought these people were kids who were going to want to pay for it.
[55:12.000 --> 55:21.000]  Well, will that get you toward your outcome or move you away from your intended outcome?
[55:21.000 --> 55:28.000]  On the racetrack deal, of course, they went bankrupt out there, and that's nothing to me anymore. They're not going to do anything to me.
[55:28.000 --> 55:36.000]  No, no, no. What is your outcome? You don't be so sure about that.
[55:36.000 --> 55:45.000]  But the point is, people get in a fight like this, and they forget where they were going.
[55:45.000 --> 55:53.000]  They start getting kicked around, and they start paying attention to being kicked around instead of what they're doing there.
[55:53.000 --> 55:55.000]  And they've used their perspective.
[55:55.000 --> 55:57.000]  Oh, I see.
[55:57.000 --> 56:08.000]  The first thing is to figure out what your outcome is, because have no idea how to address this issue until you know what you're trying to achieve.
[56:08.000 --> 56:20.000]  You need to consider the wrongs that have been done to you, and what do you want to do about them?
[56:20.000 --> 56:22.000]  Okay.
[56:22.000 --> 56:34.000]  And will doing what you want to do about them lead you toward or move you away from your intended outcome?
[56:34.000 --> 56:41.000]  Will getting an indictment move you toward or move you away from your intended outcome?
[56:41.000 --> 56:43.000]  Maybe to it.
[56:43.000 --> 56:45.000]  Are you sure?
[56:45.000 --> 56:46.000]  Yes.
[56:46.000 --> 56:55.000]  If you get an indictment, then the other side has to fight like a tiger to prove they didn't do anything wrong.
[56:55.000 --> 57:04.000]  Do you really want them dragging up all the money and resources they have in order to keep from going to jail?
[57:04.000 --> 57:15.000]  Or would you rather they give you some of that money and resource in a negotiation?
[57:15.000 --> 57:19.000]  You know, there really makes a lot of sense.
[57:19.000 --> 57:22.000]  By the way, I'm just kind of forgetting to go on.
[57:22.000 --> 57:27.000]  Yeah, figure what you want in the end.
[57:27.000 --> 57:30.000]  I'm a combat veteran.
[57:30.000 --> 57:35.000]  And one thing you learn in combat is really easy to learn this.
[57:35.000 --> 57:38.000]  Do not get into a battle you can't win.
[57:38.000 --> 57:43.000]  Or if you do get into a battle you can't win, make sure you have exit strategies.
[57:43.000 --> 57:53.000]  Do not fight a battle just because you can win it because it consumes time and resources.
[57:53.000 --> 57:57.000]  Don't go out there winning battles and wind up losing the war.
[57:57.000 --> 57:59.000]  Plot your strategy.
[57:59.000 --> 58:06.000]  Look at the resources you have and handle your resources carefully.
[58:06.000 --> 58:11.000]  Do everything you do to lead you toward your ultimate outcome.
[58:11.000 --> 58:16.000]  No matter how vulnerable a target looks, taking the target won't lead you to your outcome.
[58:16.000 --> 58:18.000]  You need to be.
[58:18.000 --> 58:22.000]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Deputy Judge Craig, Rule of Law Radio.
[58:22.000 --> 58:26.000]  And John, if you want to, we can talk about this out there.
[58:26.000 --> 58:28.000]  It's way too complex to handle on the air.
[58:28.000 --> 58:30.000]  Out of that email yet?
[58:30.000 --> 58:35.000]  Yes, email me randy at ruleoflawradio.com.
[58:35.000 --> 58:41.000]  Okay, hang on Julius, Crystal, I see you there, we will pick you up on the other side.
[58:41.000 --> 58:47.000]  Randy Kelton, Deputy Judge Craig, Rule of Law Radio 512646 from 1984.
[58:47.000 --> 58:50.000]  We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.000 --> 59:01.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.000 --> 59:06.000]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:06.000 --> 59:13.000]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.000 --> 59:28.000]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church.
[59:28.000 --> 59:34.000]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:34.000 --> 59:41.000]  call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:41.000 --> 59:45.000]  That's 888-551-0102.
[59:45.000 --> 01:00:02.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:02.000 --> 01:00:19.000]  Should the United States return some lands taken from Native Americans as a step toward ending discrimination, the UN thinks so.
[01:00:19.000 --> 01:00:35.000]  If you have enough data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:35.000 --> 01:00:40.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:40.000 --> 01:00:46.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by startpage.com.
[01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:54.000]  This is a dark chapter in American history. For more than a century, Native Americans suffered from land takings, genocide, and oppression.
[01:00:54.000 --> 01:00:58.000]  Should the U.S. government right those wrongs today? And who should say?
[01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:05.000]  The United Nations thinks it should. The UN Human Rights Council is commissioned to report on America's treatment of indigenous tribes,
[01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  suggesting that the U.S. should return land in Arizona plus the Black Hills of South Dakota to make amends.
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:16.000]  This is from history, and indigenous peoples are Americans who need help.
[01:01:16.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  Still, it's disturbing to have the UN telling us how to fix this wound to our national conscience.
[01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:35.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:42.000]  Hold the cages and dump the crates. Burger King is improving the conditions of the animals it uses for meat.
[01:01:42.000 --> 01:01:45.000]  It's a victory for the animals and for BK customers.
[01:01:45.000 --> 01:02:07.000]  I'm Catherine Albrecht. Back with more on this whopper of an announcement next.
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:27.000]  People who care about animal welfare are crowing over Burger King's promise to phase out breeding cages and crates for its chickens and pigs by 2017.
[01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  It's the most sweeping pledge yet in the multi-billion dollar fast food industry.
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:36.000]  For years, animal rights groups have called for changes in the way livestock are treated,
[01:02:36.000 --> 01:02:41.000]  like confining animals in tiny pens with concrete floors covered in manure.
[01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:48.000]  With mad cow disease, plus undercover investigations into these inhumane conditions, the public wants a change.
[01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:53.000]  Isn't it great that consumer pressure can have an impact even on the king of fast food?
[01:02:53.000 --> 01:03:12.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:03:23.000 --> 01:03:39.000]  All right folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. This is our Friday night four hour info marathon.
[01:03:39.000 --> 01:03:50.000]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984. We have a couple of callers still up on the board, so let's go to Julius and see what he's got.
[01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:53.000]  All right Julius, you are live. What's on your mind?
[01:03:53.000 --> 01:04:03.000]  Hey Eddie, how are you doing? I filed today all my refilings of motions and affidavits on the speeding case that Statman is handling
[01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:08.000]  and about a dozen of them, so she's going to be happy to get them.
[01:04:08.000 --> 01:04:20.000]  And I think the idea is everyone's talking about, and Randy was talking before about it, being a chess game and being a political arena.
[01:04:20.000 --> 01:04:27.000]  And I kind of like that. I'm kind of a chess player, so I'm looking at the elements of what I'm going through right now with two cases
[01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:33.000]  that were first taken up by my judge, Jenkins, haha, you know, pretty well.
[01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:44.000]  And now it's taken over by Statman, so there's two judges involved, and they're all doing the same thing by trying to eliminate your rights to be heard, etc.
[01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:53.000]  And then of course, Randy suggested, you know, the criminal complainant submission, which I want to file, you suggested treason.
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:05:03.000]  And I like it all, but I want to be kind of, you know, just taking my time, be a little bit more like the tortoise about it,
[01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:11.000]  rather than the rat, I'm not rushing into it, and so putting together a kind of a game plan.
[01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:16.000]  And I want to attack this because I have two judges doing the same thing pretty much.
[01:05:16.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  They're all in tandem, you know that, over there at the city of Austin Municipal Court.
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:27.000]  You know, they all do the same tactic, conspire with the prosecutor, etc.
[01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:39.000]  Now, Randy was talking about this subject matter jurisdiction, or this direct challenge to the subject matter jurisdiction, I was wondering,
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  could I file that being that my first case, this impeding traffic case, can I file that challenge to jurisdiction after that conviction and before the appeal process?
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:06:00.000]  No, the challenge to jurisdiction has to be started from the get go.
[01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:05.000]  It's not something you raise unless it's subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  Subject matter they can't get if they don't have it.
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:14.000]  Subject matter jurisdiction can be raised at any time.
[01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:15.000]  Subject can.
[01:06:15.000 --> 01:06:18.000]  Even the first time on appeal.
[01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  But in personum, if you waive that by addressing any of the merits of the case, or not reserving your special appearance, then that is gone.
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  This issue of commerce and trafficking, traveling, that goes to subject matter.
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:44.000]  I agree.
[01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  There is no regulable activity being engaged in that would give the court subject matter, and state is failing to prove standing in that degree on the record all together.
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:07:01.000]  And without that regulable activity, there cannot be a crime.
[01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:12.000]  Hence, this is a civil case, not a criminal case, because state has failed to prove the existence of the regulable activity.
[01:07:12.000 --> 01:07:27.000]  I've gotten all my documents in for challenging in personum, and I've preserved my special appearance rights and challenge all notice violations, et cetera, and also challenging jurisdiction or subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  But the actual is very document that an actual document you file for specifically challenging subject matter jurisdiction that would stop them in their tracks and say, hey.
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:48.000]  Okay, nothing's going to stop a deaf, dumb and blind moron from running forward until he hits something he can't run through.
[01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  That's what I'm talking about, but is that something that he hits that he can't run through?
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:54.000]  No, no, no, no.
[01:07:54.000 --> 01:08:00.000]  The problem there is in these cases, the wall is going to be delayed.
[01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:04.000]  It's going to be like a roadrunner film with Wiley Coyote.
[01:08:04.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  He's going to run into it.
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:14.000]  It's going to stretch deep and hard like a rubber band, but when it snaps back, it's going to throw the coyote 50 miles over the horizon.
[01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:22.000]  Well, that's what's going to happen with these judges, because here's one of the things they're doing, and I'd like to hear Randy's comment on this.
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:28.000]  They're sneaking up after the fact they're dismissing the original complaint.
[01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:37.000]  They're not notifying the accused that they have dismissed the original complaint and refiled it under a new cause number.
[01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:43.000]  When they do that, the whole process starts over from scratch.
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:46.000]  This is a brand new case.
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:56.000]  That means that they've reset everything, including your right to it, the pretrial hearings and everything else.
[01:08:56.000 --> 01:09:00.000]  Yes, and that's what happened to me today, Eddie.
[01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  I refiled everything plus a few extra motions in affidavits that I hadn't filed before, and I said, oh, good.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  I get to do this even better, and that's what I did under the new case number.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:16.000]  Randy, what do you think of that little step of what they're doing?
[01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:21.000]  Because when they dismiss that original case and refile, this is a whole brand new case.
[01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:25.000]  The whole ball of wax starts over from scratch is the way I'm looking at this.
[01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:37.000]  I think if they prosecuted you improperly the first time, then you should go after the city for malicious prosecution.
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:39.000]  Good.
[01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:46.000]  If they wanted to prosecute you for that crime, if they had grounds, they should have done it in the first place.
[01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:56.000]  If they prosecuted you for one crime, and when you fight that crime, switching it over to another and starting all over again, do they owe you your costs for the first time?
[01:09:56.000 --> 01:09:58.000]  Well, here's what they're doing.
[01:09:58.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  In Julius' case, they got his name wrong on the complaint.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:12.000]  So rather than file an amended complaint under the same cause number, they'd simply dismiss the case.
[01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:18.000]  They refile under a new cause number with a corrected complaint.
[01:10:18.000 --> 01:10:23.000]  Then choose him for the cost of adjudicating the first case.
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  You're not the one that got your name wrong. They did. This is a simple matter.
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:34.000]  Now, would I have any grounds to say, hey, look, though, as you dismissed the case, that case is over.
[01:10:34.000 --> 01:10:39.000]  How can you go back and retry me for the same case?
[01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  Well, that'll be double jeopardy only if jeopardy is already attached, Julius.
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  They would have had to have already impaneled the jury by the time they dismissed.
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  In order for double jeopardy to apply, jeopardy must attach.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:05.000]  And that only happens once the indictment and or information is filed, which of course we know they never do in these cases, even though they're required.
[01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:16.000]  They never file it. So if they had done it the day of trial, when they had the jury pool there and impaneled and then dismissed, that would have been double jeopardy.
[01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:22.000]  I got you. I see.
[01:11:22.000 --> 01:11:26.000]  I would have a question on that.
[01:11:26.000 --> 01:11:35.000]  Jeopardy would attach when the judge takes subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:39.000]  Now you're bound to the court and jeopardy does attach at that point.
[01:11:39.000 --> 01:11:47.000]  If a complaint is filed with a magistrate, jeopardy has not attached yet.
[01:11:47.000 --> 01:12:02.000]  What that was supposed to work is once the magistrate holds an examining trial and finds probable cause and then seals all the documents and forwards into the court clerk of the court of jurisdiction.
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  At that point, jeopardy attached because now you were bound to stand an answer.
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:13.000]  At the point you're bound to stand an answer, jeopardy attaches.
[01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:17.000]  Well, I would agree with that. That's my perception of it.
[01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:31.000]  But the courts once again in these fine only cases have decided to rewrite the constitutional due process pathways to make them separate and distinct from all other alleged criminal cases.
[01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  And here they've said in the case law that I found that jeopardy attaches once the jury is impaneled because the complaint alone does not constitute jeopardy.
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:44.000]  No charging instrument with it.
[01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:46.000]  Right. The complaint doesn't.
[01:12:46.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  And that's why they do it if they will.
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:55.000]  So once you come before the court, the court must make a determination of probable cause.
[01:12:55.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  That's when jeopardy would attach.
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:12:58.000]  So right.
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:12:59.000]  But they're skipping that step.
[01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:02.000]  There is never a determination of probable cause.
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:17.000]  Okay. There's no way for them to have subject matter jurisdiction. And if they change the charge before trial, then you can go back and say this court never had subject matter jurisdiction to begin with.
[01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  So suit the judge personally.
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:25.000]  The problem with subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  Right.
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:32.000]  So we should start filing civil actions against the judges personally.
[01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:35.000]  Yeah. And that's what we're doing in my case.
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:38.000]  My case is going to be the step child for that case.
[01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:50.000]  When the judge goes to the county attorney or to a one of the municipal attorneys and has them or even the city attorney and has the city attorney write the answer.
[01:13:50.000 --> 01:14:04.000]  Then you sue the city attorney for misappropriation of public funds because she sued the judge in his personal capacity, not his official.
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:12.000]  That's what we did to Evans and JP in the courthouse in Travis County.
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:16.000]  That was a hoot.
[01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  But we need to start doing that. We start filing civil actions, civil actions. That's what's really going to hurt them.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:24.000]  Randy.
[01:14:24.000 --> 01:14:26.000]  Yes.
[01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:40.000]  What about getting their oaths of office and saying, did you swear to uphold this or that US Constitution, Texas Constitution and going back on your transcripts and seeing where they violated their oath?
[01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:48.000]  We are not going to get the courts or even a jury to adjudicate that issue. We need to do something was simple and basic.
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  Here the court says in this idea of jurisdiction and the courts are saying that jeopardy doesn't attached until it gets trial. But okay, when I got the ticket and this Georgia's judge was ordering me around and forcing me to come back over and over.
[01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:20.000]  Not of my own free will, but all the threats of him exercising an authority. And then we get to this point and all of a sudden he says, oh my, look at this, we made a mistake.
[01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:25.000]  We dismissed that because it wasn't in the right name.
[01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:28.000]  Oh, is that a fact, Jack?
[01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:40.000]  So you ordered me to come down here all of these times forced me to spend my time and my money to come down here while you were kicking me around in your court. And it just doesn't matter.
[01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  Well, yeah, it does matter.
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  And you did not have subject matter jurisdiction. When you did this, therefore you were acting in your own personal capacity, not within the scope of your authority as a judge for the State of Texas.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  And see him in the civil court.
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:13.000]  Yeah. They can't go back. They can't go back and change time. They can't go back, fix the complaint, go back to before all this nonsense started and get it right. Can't do it.
[01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  No, you're to abide by 45.018b and 45.019f. That is a bell they cannot unring.
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:27.000]  Yeah, and time has passed. So it's gone. It's over.
[01:16:27.000 --> 01:16:40.000]  Yeah, and you would have had to been there when I did that to the Randall County clerk who she brought me the files that she refused to give. And I told him, sorry, that bill has already been wrong.
[01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  It had to see the look on his face to appreciate how powerful that can be.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:49.000]  Okay, we're about to go back to Greg.
[01:16:49.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  This is Randy Kelk, Nick Stevens, Eddie Craig with our radio. Crystal Roger, I see you there. We'll pick you up on the other side. We'll be right back.
[01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:33.000]  We're here to get some of the new kits and our Silverpool, a new way to guarantee silver by prepaying at a locked price. We can even help you set up a metals IRA account. Call us at 512-646-644-0 for more details.
[01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  As always, we buy, sell and trade precious metals, give appraisals and cater to those with all sizes of coin collections. We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, sweet A, about half a mile north of Canig next to the Iki-Bon Sushi and Genie Car Wash.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2. Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-644-0 and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[01:18:18.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  No credit checks and no social security numbers required. That's why our name is FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  Finally, residential, mobile and business telephones and plans that are private and never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:44.000]  When a low price, residential and business plans started only $14.99 and mobile plans started just $39.99. Plus, every month you pay your bill, FreedomTelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs.
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:56.000]  Don't wait. Support the cause and get the highest quality and the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553. That's 800-600-5553.
[01:18:56.000 --> 01:19:21.000]  FreedomTelephones.com, portable, private, perfect.
[01:19:21.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. I was blindsided, but now I can see your eyes. You put the fear in my pockets, took the money from my hands. Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:51.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:51.000 --> 01:20:03.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984. This is our four-hour Infomerathon Friday.
[01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:12.000]  And we got a little over two hours left in the show now. And we're going to go to Crystal in Nevada. Crystal, what can we do for you?
[01:20:12.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  Hey, yeah, I've been enjoying the show so far. I have two kind of simple questions, I think. One time you mentioned something about the IRS having a file on people that puts them in a federal...
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  In a particular job capacity other than one they actually occupy. That was Randy's deal there, but yes.
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:47.000]  That's the master file. You can request your master file. I was just looking at a website yesterday. Let me see if I can pull up the link to it.
[01:20:47.000 --> 01:21:07.000]  Where this was a leak for family law for, I think it was for husbands, but it had a leak to a CD to show you how to decode the master files.
[01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:18.000]  There are people out there who, that's their business, is decoding master files. But you definitely want to get your master file.
[01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  When you ask for the master file, that's going to tell them that you're preparing to fight them.
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  So I asked the IRS for my master file?
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:39.000]  Yeah, ask them for your master file and then get someone to tell you where that code is. There is a list of what these codes mean.
[01:21:39.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  Yes, tell them you're not a truck driver transporting poppy field debris in Afghanistan, okay?
[01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:59.000]  It's that ridiculous. This guy is the auto mechanic in Guam, a narcotic salesman in the Virgin Islands.
[01:21:59.000 --> 01:22:11.000]  So you want to find the employment code, then you ask the IRS who put that code in there?
[01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  Exactly. A lot of times what creates the most politics is asking the right question.
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:28.000]  And the question is, who put that code there and where did they come up with it?
[01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  And you have an IRS agent coming after you to collect taxes. Okay, you believe that I am a taxpayer because this code says that I'm a taxpayer.
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:51.000]  And like the fellow in Austin, a friend of mine, he thought he was an all state insurance agent in Austin.
[01:22:51.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  But he really wasn't. He was a narcotic salesman in the Virgin Islands. So the question becomes,
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  if this IRS agent is acting on the premise that the individual is a narcotic salesman in the Virgin Islands,
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:15.000]  isn't it strange that he maintains an address in South Austin?
[01:23:15.000 --> 01:23:24.000]  And isn't it also strange that you can't find a registered address for you in the Virgin Islands?
[01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  Right.
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:31.000]  So did it ever occur to you that perhaps this code could be wrong?
[01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:36.000]  And he's going to say, oh, no. He's going to say, of course not. It didn't occur to you.
[01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  You didn't need to. You knew for certain that it was fraud.
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  It was fraud from the get go. So the agent who's trying to collect based on this code is acting with knowing and deliberate fraud.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:05.000]  And that is not a federal crime. Just because he's a federal agent, he is within the borders of the state of Texas.
[01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:13.000]  That's a common law crime. That's a state crime. You take him to a state grand jury for that.
[01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:16.000]  Now you'll get yourself some politics.
[01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:23.000]  Yeah. All right. The other question, and I don't know if anybody knows, I've been online trying to figure this out.
[01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:31.000]  I just got my new driver's license that, you know, I'm not a driver, but I got the license.
[01:24:31.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  And it's all new. And I guess this is part of the Real ID Act of 2005.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:46.000]  And item number five, which has the initial DD, which I think stands for district designation, but I can't find out what it stands for.
[01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:49.000]  And then it's about a 21-digit number.
[01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:53.000]  And it's four zeros and then 17 digits.
[01:24:53.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  And nobody online seems to know what it is. There's a lot of questions.
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:24:59.000]  Are you in Texas?
[01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  Is it in Texas too?
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:07.000]  No. Yeah. Oh, you're in Nevada. Okay. Go to the DMV. They produced it.
[01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:10.000]  No, no. The DMV doesn't know what it is.
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  Send him a written request.
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  A written request? Well, okay.
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  Okay. Here's a rule. If a government official's lips are moving.
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:25.000]  Yeah.
[01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:32.000]  They always keep that in mind. They feel like it's perfectly all right for them to like to.
[01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:42.000]  So unless you make them do it in writing, and then all of a sudden their attitude changes dramatically.
[01:25:42.000 --> 01:25:52.000]  So if you can avoid it, never ask them anything. If you ask them something and they give you an answer you don't like,
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:56.000]  take out a piece of paper and make the request in writing.
[01:25:56.000 --> 01:26:00.000]  Okay. And they'll say, well, you know, I just told you I don't have that information.
[01:26:00.000 --> 01:26:04.000]  And this is what I tell clerks all the time. I say, yeah, I understand that.
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:08.000]  But I need this in writing.
[01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:13.000]  Okay. Like the clerk said, well, I just told, we just told you we don't have those records.
[01:26:13.000 --> 01:26:19.000]  I said, yes, I understand. So what I need you to do is respond to this request with the letter saying,
[01:26:19.000 --> 01:26:24.000]  you have no records responsive to my request.
[01:26:24.000 --> 01:26:31.000]  That way, when I get court, I can prove in court on this day at this time.
[01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:38.000]  These records were not here. Or if you want, and if this guy tells you they don't know,
[01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:41.000]  then ask him to give you that in writing.
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  And when he refuses, ask for always you want to talk to the director.
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:51.000]  Yeah, I don't want to talk to his boss.
[01:26:51.000 --> 01:26:55.000]  You want the director to talk to his boss.
[01:26:55.000 --> 01:26:59.000]  The director is the only one that works for you.
[01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:07.000]  Everybody else works for him. So you cheat out, not the director, but the director secretary.
[01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  Right.
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  This is the politics.
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  The director has to exercise a certain amount of professional decorum, dignity, and caution with his underlings.
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  His secretary doesn't have to do any of those things.
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  She can do all the dirty work for him. So she's the one you want to talk to.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:35.000]  Okay. Well, that's a good personal policy and you're right.
[01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:40.000]  I should get everything from those people in writing from now on.
[01:27:40.000 --> 01:27:46.000]  Ken's fourth rule, document, document, document.
[01:27:46.000 --> 01:27:49.000]  If it's not writing, it didn't happen.
[01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:51.000]  You're right. Okay.
[01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:58.000]  If you send a letter and it's not certified, return receipt requested, it doesn't.
[01:27:58.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  Same thing. Okay.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:03.000]  All right. Good info. Appreciate it.
[01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:06.000]  Already. Okay. Thank you.
[01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:15.000]  Okay. We're going to go to Roger in Oklahoma.
[01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:18.000]  Howdy, Roger. What do you have for us today?
[01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  Well, maybe you can get some helper guides. I've got a petition filed in court against myself from a city bank, South Dakota N, what it says, and I'm the plaintiff.
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:52.000]  They tried to serve us. They were got service. Finally, they made a motion to the court to have alternate means of service by posting it on my home and just smelling regular mail, which they did.
[01:28:52.000 --> 01:29:07.000]  Then I, at that point in time, I answered. My answer was denied. Everything even looks like they've tried it. Okay.
[01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:18.000]  Okay. Hold on. Okay. Give us some kind of idea of what we're talking about. Family law, foreclosure, property, criminal, what kind of cases?
[01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:26.000]  Credit card. Credit card. Oh, okay. Credit card. Okay.
[01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:38.000]  Then the petition, the first complaint was that the plaintiff is a national bank under federal law.
[01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  Okay. Hang on. Hang on just a second. We're about to go to break. And this is Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig. We have no radio. Our call in number 5126461984.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  A call board is running kind of short. You're going to have to listen to me preach. So give us a call. We'll be right back on the other side.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  A Noble Live, Oklahoma City, 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism. Based on the damage pattern to the building, but the government seems impossible.
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say. The decision was made not to pursue any man, those individuals. Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing. Expose the cover up now at anoblelive.com.
[01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:39.000]  The rule of law radio network is proud to present a due process of law seminar hosted by our own Eddie Craig. Eddie is a former Nacodotius sheriff's deputy.
[01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:51.000]  And for the past 21 years, he's been studying the due process of law and now offers his knowledge to you at a seminar every Sunday from 2 o'clock to 5 o'clock at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:30:51.000 --> 01:31:00.000]  Admission is $20, so please make plans to come by and sit with Eddie and learn for yourself what the true intent of law really is.
[01:31:00.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  At hempusa.org, we offer chemical-free products to people around the world, detoxifying, self-healing while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:22.000]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest-selling product, micro-plant powder. Our micro-plant powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc, and silica to help rebuild the immune system.
[01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:29.000]  And to create a healthy stomach flora, micro-plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:31:29.000 --> 01:31:42.000]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org. And remember, all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat. We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality, and rapid shipping anywhere.
[01:31:42.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S. Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:32:02.000]  That's 908-6912608. See what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:32:02.000 --> 01:32:23.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:52.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kalkin demonstrating with a great video, and we're talking to Rick in Oklahoma.
[01:32:52.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  Okay, Rick, where were we when we went out? Excuse me now. Okay, where were we when we went on break?
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:16.000]  Petition was filed on the credit card debt against me, and they didn't get service. They had alternate means of service with a motion through the court to send a regular mail and post on my home.
[01:33:16.000 --> 01:33:25.000]  Then I received that, and then I answered the petition denying all the allegations in the petition.
[01:33:25.000 --> 01:33:53.000]  And then received a, by the fact today, received a plaintiff's motion for a summary judgment and a brief in support. And all they have in that is an ask with David from someone in Missouri stating that they work for this company, City Bank, South Dakota N.A.,
[01:33:53.000 --> 01:34:07.000]  with receipts from a credit card company from AT&T Universal Card. The petition was filed as a plaintiff's City Bank, South Dakota N.
[01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:25.000]  A. David says that she works for... Okay, wait a minute. Wait a minute. You don't need all of these minute details. Have you looked at the Michael Mears method?
[01:34:25.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  I have not. You need to look on the, on our website, on Wuva Radio or LogosRadio.com, and click on the Michael Mears spanner. He's the guy that can show you how to kick their behinds everywhere from Sunday.
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:55.000]  Okay. Anyhow, familiar with the credit card approach are you? I'm not too familiar with it.
[01:34:55.000 --> 01:35:06.000]  Well, I haven't actually used it. I don't use credit cards or anything of that nature, but I've looked at his package. What's the question?
[01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:18.000]  I'm just looking for the next step. He's got everything lined out from step one to step finish in that entire package. It tells you everything.
[01:35:18.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  The first response letter to them, the first notice and demand to them, the validation letter, everything that the federal and state laws require you to have.
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:38.000]  Michael Mears has already got set up and ready to go in this. It's very much like my traffic seminar material for frightened tickets here in Texas.
[01:35:38.000 --> 01:35:45.000]  Right. I did not see the banner clicking on here on Wuva Radio for the Michael Mears.
[01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:51.000]  It's a blue banner down at the bottom that says stop credit card collectors or something like that.
[01:35:51.000 --> 01:36:05.000]  Okay. It's not Jurisdictionary or anything like that. No. It's the blue and right under that that says what to do when contacted by phone or by summons.
[01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:10.000]  It's the one that keeps changing. How to get that collectors? It's right under the Jurisdictionary.
[01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  Okay. I'll contact him. Actually, he'll talk with you if you'll get the package. He'll give you support and tell you what to do, but you've got to order the package.
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:28.000]  Right. Okay.
[01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  And you can do that by clicking on that link on the website.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:33.000]  Okay. Thank you, sir.
[01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:37.000]  Yes, sir. You're welcome.
[01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  All right, folks. Roger was our last caller. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:49.000]  Randy, you said there was something else you want to roll into if we run out of time with Roger.
[01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:59.000]  Yeah. I know I've been spending a lot of time talking about the foreclosure issue, but it's because that's what I've been researching lately.
[01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  And finding lots of interesting stuff. It seems like every time I look at these,
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  a pretty well begun to focus on the court record.
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:25.000]  The record of the county clerk because in the end, that's where all the action is.
[01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  The only ones that I have seen that have the records filed correctly are after 2010 or at least semi-correctly.
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:44.000]  And these are notes that were written after 2010.
[01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:56.000]  The foreclosures after 2010, the lenders are doing some song and dance to try to get around the issues that we're bringing in court.
[01:37:56.000 --> 01:38:08.000]  And with what I'm seeing the lenders doing, it's beginning to get clear that they are getting gun shy.
[01:38:08.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  They're beginning to get beat up a lot in court and they're beginning to get a lot more careful.
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:25.000]  I have one person that worked them over pretty good and now they're just sitting.
[01:38:25.000 --> 01:38:29.000]  I've got several people that way.
[01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  And Johnny last night who talked about how he took them on and once they ruled against him, the bank still didn't move ahead.
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:54.000]  And a lot of that I believe is because at this point these foreclosure mills that were just running a glut on the public
[01:38:54.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  and now they're beginning to look at what they have been filing and they have concerns that all of that stuff may come back to haunt them.
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:20.000]  Sure they may have made a lot of money to get some nice pretty toys, nice houses, but now they're looking at the prospect of winding up with somebody else buying those houses after they go to prison.
[01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:36.000]  And they should very well consider that possibility because as I look at these documents, the filings are absolutely outrageous.
[01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:45.000]  It's hard to look at this and believe that professional people actually did this.
[01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:50.000]  I look at this and wonder how can these people be this dumb.
[01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:55.000]  From the jurats back, everything.
[01:39:55.000 --> 01:40:06.000]  We've got jurats that are obviously forged and not only are they forged, the dates are all wrong.
[01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  I've got jurats where the notary is not verifying the signing of the document.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:35.000]  The notary is verifying that the person who claims to have signed the document several days ago assured the notary that several days ago they actually signed that document.
[01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  Are you kidding me? This is not what notaries do.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  That would take an affidavit.
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:41:01.000]  If the document was previously signed, then they would need an affidavit and the notary would need to verify the affidavit when the person signed the affidavit.
[01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  But the notaries are notarizing documents that are dated 10 days before the notary.
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  And these were been requesting sequential ledgers from notaries.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:23.000]  And so far we haven't gotten any.
[01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  There's one particular ledger we're going to start requesting that we haven't been.
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  And that's the notary on the deed of trust.
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  The deed of trust, that's a document that the borrower filled out.
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:47.000]  And he was sitting at closing and filled it out and signed it.
[01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:53.000]  And generally there's a notary there and the notary filled in the jurat.
[01:41:53.000 --> 01:42:00.000]  So we've been including those when I do the evaluation.
[01:42:00.000 --> 01:42:09.000]  I break the document apart and I say that, you know, on this certain day a document was filed in the county record titled as follows.
[01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  And then I capture out the title from the document pasted into the pleading.
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:23.000]  And then defines the document as a security instrument as follows and I capture that out.
[01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:30.000]  And I just walk down all the relevant sections of the document and drop it in as a statement of facts.
[01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:33.000]  And then I drop in the jurat.
[01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:41.000]  And I do the jurat from the deed of trust because it's correct.
[01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:52.000]  It is, for the most part, obviously filled out by the in hand, by hand, all of the dates and everything are done by hand.
[01:42:52.000 --> 01:43:01.000]  And the hand is clearly the same pen and same hand that signed the jurat.
[01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:08.000]  Then we go down to every other document in the record.
[01:43:08.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  And not one of them have everything in the jurat filled out by hand.
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  Or if it is filled out by hand, it is very clearly filled out by the affluent, not by the notary.
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:31.000]  So the notary is supposedly sitting here and the affluent signs it.
[01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  Anybody here who's ever had a document notarized, they'll recall they signed the document and then they turned it around to the notary and the notary children that you're at.
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:50.000]  Well, in all these, the affluent's filling in the jurat and getting the dates wrong.
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:55.000]  It's even the quickest, guys, if you're gonna forge it, at least forge it, right?
[01:43:55.000 --> 01:44:01.000]  That's not all, they seem to be the worst. This is ready to count your activity, Craig.
[01:44:01.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the internet isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Brave New Books?
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:20.000]  Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:24.000]  They even stock Interfood, Burkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:35.000]  Oh, by UT, there's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:44:35.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:56.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m., and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays. So get them a call at 512-480-2503,
[01:44:56.000 --> 01:45:00.000]  or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary.
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  The affordable, easy-to-understand four-city course that will show you how in 24 hours, you step by step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.000 --> 01:46:14.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:30.000]  Okay, come as much as you want. Come on.
[01:46:30.000 --> 01:46:32.000]  Finjury, come on.
[01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  As we go, so shall we be.
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:40.000]  There was some nutrition from so many fruits.
[01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:45.000]  No words can put on all of me.
[01:46:45.000 --> 01:46:48.000]  The market car, not your fancy.
[01:46:48.000 --> 01:47:01.000]  Okay, we're back to the video, and I know I've spent a lot of time talking about this, but I've also spent a lot of time digging into it.
[01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:17.000]  I will probably, I have a guest next Thursday who has a company that does forensic analysis or securities analysis.
[01:47:17.000 --> 01:47:30.000]  And I primarily am going to try to get him to talk about causes of action related to securities analysis.
[01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:41.000]  Because at this point, I don't see much value in him, but anyway, we're looking at all the details in order to find a way to beat these courts.
[01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:52.000]  It's became clear that we really got to get down to the details that challenged the subject matter jurisdiction I read earlier.
[01:47:52.000 --> 01:48:01.000]  In that case, the Deed of Trust didn't list the lender.
[01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:11.000]  It listed the lender as a beneficiary, or at least a company name that looked like the lender was listed as beneficiary.
[01:48:11.000 --> 01:48:17.000]  But under the lender section, it just said that the borrower owes the lender all this stuff this money.
[01:48:17.000 --> 01:48:20.000]  It never said who the lender was.
[01:48:20.000 --> 01:48:29.000]  So it didn't indicate to whom the confessed judgment was confessed.
[01:48:29.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  And then there was an assignment by U.S. Bank National Association.
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:44.000]  Well, they're not mentioned in the Deed of Trust, and there are no other documents in the record.
[01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:48.000]  So where did these people come from?
[01:48:48.000 --> 01:48:52.000]  There's nothing in the record to show that they have any authority.
[01:48:52.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  And that's why we challenge subject matter jurisdiction, because we maintained that.
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:08.000]  The actor or the plaintiff lacked standing to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.
[01:49:08.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  And that's why we went after subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:21.000]  And it was the court's duty to be sure that the person who claimed they had power to take this action actually had power to do that.
[01:49:21.000 --> 01:49:29.000]  And when we challenge it, the judge just chose to ignore it, and everything has a remedy.
[01:49:29.000 --> 01:49:32.000]  We just need to look for the remedy and exercise it.
[01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:35.000]  In this case, Sue and the judge is one of the remedies.
[01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:38.000]  Okay, I'm going to stop you. I can never get a couple of callers.
[01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:43.000]  I'm going to go to Justin in Texas.
[01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:46.000]  Hello, Justin. What do you have for us today?
[01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:55.000]  Hey, Randy. Well, in light of the events, the movie theater shooting in Colorado,
[01:49:55.000 --> 01:50:08.000]  I just wanted to get your guys' take on the potential of that being a false flag with this UN treaty that is a couple of weeks off from being passed through in legislation.
[01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:23.000]  And I just wanted to see what you guys thought about citizens who are lawful carrying a concealed into a movie theater in the future to hopefully, you know,
[01:50:23.000 --> 01:50:31.000]  prevent or stop this type of scenario from, you know, being as bad as it was.
[01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:35.000]  Well, clarify for me what you mean by lawful.
[01:50:35.000 --> 01:50:40.000]  Well, I mean, first of all, is it against the law? I mean, I don't know gun rights very well.
[01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:49.000]  I am in the process of purchasing a.38 revolver from McBride, Sharon Austin.
[01:50:49.000 --> 01:51:00.000]  And I just want to know if I get a concealed handgun permit if it would be lawful to carry into a movie theater.
[01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  Or do you think that this kind of a situation is going to prevent?
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:11.000]  I think it is lawful. You can't take it into a tavern.
[01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:16.000]  There's a few places I can't. I haven't seen that on a movie theater.
[01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:22.000]  Okay, so then our Second Amendment right does protect us.
[01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:26.000]  If it was being treated as a right, you wouldn't be needing the license, would you?
[01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  No, that's true. So, I mean, I guess I'll take my answers off the eye.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:36.000]  I just kind of wanted to start the topic and see where you guys run with this.
[01:51:36.000 --> 01:51:41.000]  But I would like to know more about our gun rights, especially here in Texas.
[01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:48.000]  And if, well, like if Eddie, if you were carrying concealed in the movie theater when this happened,
[01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:54.000]  if you would have ran out or if you would have stopped and returned fired,
[01:51:54.000 --> 01:52:00.000]  I just would like to kind of get your guys' perspective, especially since Eddie, you were a former sheriff.
[01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:07.000]  So, I'll take my answer off there because I'm wasting my money while I'm not wasting them.
[01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  Yeah, okay. Not a problem, Justin.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:11.000]  I appreciate your cell phone. Thanks, guys.
[01:52:11.000 --> 01:52:12.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:16.000]  Okay. Randy, you want to address that first? Do you want me to?
[01:52:16.000 --> 01:52:25.000]  Let me address my position first. I think anybody who's listened to this show for a while knows how I feel about guns.
[01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:31.000]  I was a weapons specialist in the military. I'm very knowledgeable about guns.
[01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:38.000]  I'm more knowledgeable than most, not so much in the particulars of guns.
[01:52:38.000 --> 01:52:44.000]  But I was a sharp shooter in the military. I just had a Mac for it.
[01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:51.000]  So, I'm knowledgeable about the back end, and I'm also very knowledgeable about the sharp end,
[01:52:51.000 --> 01:52:59.000]  because I've spent my time on the sharp end, and I can tell you, it really sucks.
[01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:06.000]  What they show in the movies, there's no glamor in it.
[01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:17.000]  Even in the show in the movie where the cop shoots the bad guy, it is really, really hard on you when you shoot a human being,
[01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:22.000]  unless you're just a total sociopath.
[01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:28.000]  Being on either side of those things really suck, in my opinion.
[01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:41.000]  With that said, it is my opinion that if everyone carried a weapon, we would not be having these problems.
[01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:48.000]  There's a movie probably everybody saw, this scene where these two guys go in to rob this bar,
[01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:56.000]  and they pull a gun on the bartender, and one of them turns around and tells everybody to put their hands on the table.
[01:53:56.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  And it's about 15 seconds of hammers cocking back.
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:06.000]  It's a police bar, and everybody's got a gun.
[01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:11.000]  And the guy, one of the guys waxed the other on the shoulder and told him,
[01:54:11.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  I told you this was a bad idea.
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:24.000]  Well, I had experience, I was once thrown to the top half of a window out of a beer joint in Kauat, Thailand.
[01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:27.000]  We had Army and Air Force there.
[01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:31.000]  And when they got together off base, it was always a fight.
[01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:37.000]  In this case, it was a pretty big fight, and I was sitting by my own business.
[01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:47.000]  I had already taken karate on base, and the karate instructor and some of the guys there had beaten me up enough
[01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:52.000]  that I had decided I'd had enough of that, and I didn't want any part of this bar fight.
[01:54:52.000 --> 01:55:01.000]  But two of the Army guys decided that I was in the way and picking me up through the head top half a window.
[01:55:01.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  Everybody in the place was armed to the teeth.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:13.000]  Nobody ever even considered pulling a weapon.
[01:55:13.000 --> 01:55:26.000]  If you pulled a weapon in that crowded bar, your own guys would shoot you because they would know you were so drunk and out of your mind you're likely to shoot them.
[01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:31.000]  An armed society is a polite society.
[01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:41.000]  And in an armed society, this guy would have never walked into that movie theater and tried to open up with a weapon.
[01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:50.000]  He would have had quite a few holes in him before he could get out, so I want everybody to have a gun.
[01:55:50.000 --> 01:55:53.000]  I just don't want to have one.
[01:55:53.000 --> 01:56:00.000]  Well, that's my story, and I've turned this over to Eddie. He's probably got a somewhat different approach.
[01:56:00.000 --> 01:56:03.000]  Well, no, not a whole lot.
[01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:16.000]  To answer your question, yes, if I had a gun and I had a shot, then yes, I would have taken it if I wasn't already dead and bleeding or wounded beyond the ability to respond.
[01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:28.000]  I mean, the whole purpose of having the gun on you in the first place is to protect you and those around you, not to be the guy doing the shooting, but to be able to respond when someone like that starts.
[01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:32.000]  It's about self-defense, not being on the offensive.
[01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  If the military members that had been in there had been carrying a gun, he probably would not have been able to shoot 70-some-odd people.
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:56.000]  Now, as far as addressing the right to carry a gun, well, my opinion of what the Constitution for Texas says and what the state wants us to believe it says is slightly different.
[01:56:56.000 --> 01:57:03.000]  I stand by the motto that the state does not give us the right to keep and bear arms.
[01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:10.000]  It's a right we have inherent in our right to protect and defend ourselves, our property, and our families.
[01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:13.000]  The state's got nothing to do with it.
[01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:27.000]  That little second blurb that's been amended to the 1876 Constitution on the right to keep and bear arms where it says the state shall have the power to regulate the wearing of arms with an eye towards crime prevention.
[01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  Well, let me translate that little piece of legalese.
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:39.000]  The state has the power to authorize licensed peace officers to carry a gun.
[01:57:39.000 --> 01:57:51.000]  Hence the whole reason they must be licensed, but they can't license the people's right to protect themselves, their family, and their property.
[01:57:51.000 --> 01:57:56.000]  That right existed before that little change to the Constitution ever came along.
[01:57:56.000 --> 01:58:00.000]  It existed before the Constitution itself came along.
[01:58:00.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  And the whole problem with our elected officials is somehow they feel that we are a democracy that is ruled by everyone else's majority vote as to what our rights are.
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:17.000]  And I disagree.
[01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:19.000]  Alright folks, this is Rural Law Radio.
[01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:21.000]  We are going to break.
[01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:25.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  Johnny, we see you on the board.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  Coming on there, we will get you on the other side of this break.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:32.000]  This is Rural Law Radio.
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  We will be right back.
[01:59:02.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  We are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.