ROL_2012-04-13_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:07.680]  Mmm, this lemon slice is as sweet as lemon meringue pie, and these rock cranberries taste
[00:07.680 --> 00:08.680]  like candy.
[00:08.680 --> 00:09.680]  Am I crazy?
[00:09.680 --> 00:11.680]  No, but I do have a secret.
[00:11.680 --> 00:16.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back to tell you what it is.
[00:16.320 --> 00:17.920]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:17.920 --> 00:22.320]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy
[00:22.320 --> 00:26.000]  is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.000 --> 00:31.440]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.440 --> 00:34.040]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.040 --> 00:38.320]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[00:38.320 --> 00:41.840]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:41.840 --> 00:45.280]  Start over with StartPage.
[00:45.280 --> 00:48.000]  It's been called a hallucinogen for the tongue.
[00:48.000 --> 00:53.000]  Miracle fruit, or cinnipalum dulcivicum, is a small red fruit from West Africa.
[00:53.000 --> 00:58.040]  Eating just one tiny berry makes sour things taste sweet for up to two hours.
[00:58.040 --> 01:02.640]  The secret is a substance called miraculous, a protein that binds to the taste buds to
[01:02.640 --> 01:06.240]  make the sourest of foods taste like they've been dipped in sugar.
[01:06.240 --> 01:11.000]  Food aficionados have been throwing taste-tripping parties where they eat the fruit, then sip
[01:11.000 --> 01:16.200]  vinegar, suck lemons, and crunch pickles to experience the amazing effects.
[01:16.200 --> 01:19.200]  Miracle fruit is safe, legal, and readily available by mail.
[01:19.200 --> 01:23.400]  Now all we need is a fruit to take the calories out of cheesecake.
[01:23.400 --> 01:32.720]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32.720 --> 01:37.720]  Robotic helicopters will soon be patrolling our skies and packing some spine-tingling
[01:37.720 --> 01:38.720]  heat.
[01:38.720 --> 01:43.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and if being tased by a toy-sized chopper sounds scary to you,
[01:43.880 --> 01:46.800]  you won't want to miss my next segment.
[01:46.800 --> 01:49.560]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:49.560 --> 01:52.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy
[01:52.760 --> 01:56.760]  is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.760 --> 02:02.040]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:02.040 --> 02:04.520]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[02:04.520 --> 02:08.840]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:08.840 --> 02:12.320]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.320 --> 02:15.520]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.520 --> 02:21.080]  Unmanned aerial vehicles, we send them to strike at insurgents in Iraq and spy on drug dealers
[02:21.080 --> 02:22.080]  in Mexico.
[02:22.080 --> 02:26.680]  Now, in a creepy twist, the Department of Homeland Security is buying a squadron of
[02:26.680 --> 02:30.360]  so-called shadow hawks for Texas' Montgomery County.
[02:30.360 --> 02:34.680]  These 50-pound choppers hit top speeds of 70 miles an hour.
[02:34.680 --> 02:40.080]  They can be outfitted with stun guns capable of paralyzing people from 100 feet, 12-gauge
[02:40.080 --> 02:43.480]  shotguns, and believe it or not, grenade launchers.
[02:43.480 --> 02:48.560]  Their infrared cameras can film and track anyone within a 35-mile range for up to three
[02:48.560 --> 02:50.000]  and a half hours.
[02:50.000 --> 02:53.760]  With drones like these on the beat, will there be anywhere left to hide?
[02:53.760 --> 02:55.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:55.760 --> 02:58.760]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[02:58.760 --> 03:09.760]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[03:09.760 --> 03:37.760]  Well, I received my remedy today, came in a box just like the safe I accepted for value
[03:37.760 --> 03:38.760]  right away.
[03:38.760 --> 03:39.760]  Okay.
[03:39.760 --> 03:40.760]  We're back.
[03:40.760 --> 04:06.200]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig of Logos Radio, and we're talking to Francis
[04:06.200 --> 04:15.120]  in Colorado, Francis, who is trying to make points with all these attorneys.
[04:15.120 --> 04:22.480]  Tell us about, and this story is interesting because of this probate issue, tell us about
[04:22.480 --> 04:25.640]  what occurred with this attorney in Florida.
[04:25.640 --> 04:37.120]  Well, the most recent one that I bar-greaved wrote a will for my father at the request
[04:37.120 --> 04:44.360]  of my brother, and so I bar-greaved him, and knowing that there was another will, and when
[04:44.360 --> 04:49.760]  it got to the bar, they didn't just round file it and send me the letter like they normally
[04:49.760 --> 04:54.840]  do that they weren't going to do anything, they gave him the opportunity to respond.
[04:54.840 --> 05:01.200]  When he responds, his response is more like a confession, and gave me the meat for two
[05:01.200 --> 05:08.160]  more bar-greavances, and now I'm responding, and it'll probably go from probate to criminal
[05:08.160 --> 05:09.160]  court now.
[05:09.160 --> 05:16.040]  Well, it also sounds like you may have grounds for a malpractice suit against the attorney
[05:16.040 --> 05:18.920]  yourself, because you were harmed at this when the will got changed.
[05:18.920 --> 05:21.320]  Holy smokes, there's something else to do.
[05:21.320 --> 05:22.320]  Thanks, Eddie.
[05:22.320 --> 05:23.320]  You're welcome.
[05:23.320 --> 05:34.920]  You are having way too much fun, and you can sue him in Colorado, in the Colorado Federal
[05:34.920 --> 05:35.920]  Court.
[05:35.920 --> 05:39.600]  Absolutely, you live there, you're harmed there, therefore that's where the venue would
[05:39.600 --> 05:40.600]  be.
[05:40.600 --> 05:43.440]  So, I sue him for malpractice?
[05:43.440 --> 05:44.440]  Yes.
[05:44.440 --> 05:52.160]  It's probably something more specific you can sue him for, malpractice is just the fact
[05:52.160 --> 06:03.760]  that you sue the attorney for what he did under the color of his bar license.
[06:03.760 --> 06:09.880]  But more specifically, you sue him for fraud, coming off fraud.
[06:09.880 --> 06:14.680]  Yeah, remember, he is a fiduciary by law.
[06:14.680 --> 06:22.120]  He has an obligation to his client, or to those that are involved in the case itself.
[06:22.120 --> 06:25.440]  He cannot defraud either side.
[06:25.440 --> 06:28.520]  Now, wait a minute, this is different.
[06:28.520 --> 06:30.120]  No, I'm just saying.
[06:30.120 --> 06:32.120]  No, he wrote a will.
[06:32.120 --> 06:39.480]  So, he's not the brother's attorney, he's all of the heir's attorney, he's your attorney.
[06:39.480 --> 06:42.760]  Right, I agree, and that's what I was getting to.
[06:42.760 --> 06:50.040]  But even if he was not, if you were, he can't act to defraud either side, either the one
[06:50.040 --> 06:53.280]  he's going against or the one he's representing.
[06:53.280 --> 06:56.600]  So either way, you would have a cause of action against him.
[06:56.600 --> 07:03.480]  But in this case, being one of the heirs and working for one of the heirs, then he's obligated
[07:03.480 --> 07:09.440]  to all of you as a fiduciary, because he's actually working on a will.
[07:09.440 --> 07:16.080]  And what I'm wondering is, how did your brother instigate the developing of a will over the
[07:16.080 --> 07:17.760]  parent?
[07:17.760 --> 07:22.600]  Money talks and bull, money talks, he's got lots and lots of money, and he had worked
[07:22.600 --> 07:25.400]  for my brother before.
[07:25.400 --> 07:29.960]  And we're talking hundreds of millions of dollars my brother has.
[07:29.960 --> 07:34.240]  You may wind up with some of those, this is a conspiracy to defraud.
[07:34.240 --> 07:39.040]  Oh, sure, well, yeah, there was undue force, I don't think he had capacity.
[07:39.040 --> 07:46.560]  He died in a nursing home 29 days later in a coma, his signature is way beyond being
[07:46.560 --> 07:50.200]  that just of an elderly person.
[07:50.200 --> 07:56.400]  There's so many things, it's unbelievable, this attorney never met my father.
[07:56.400 --> 08:00.120]  And this letter is all just filled up with hearsay.
[08:00.120 --> 08:06.240]  She said, he said, frankly, it's a stunner.
[08:06.240 --> 08:16.320]  Because that is wonderful information you can use, because that is essentially an affidavit.
[08:16.320 --> 08:23.240]  You can bring that into any court, and now you have this own judicial admission.
[08:23.240 --> 08:28.600]  And then he enclosed an affidavit by my mother, which is also full of lies.
[08:28.600 --> 08:32.840]  Well, let's see, let's take this one step further though.
[08:32.840 --> 08:37.960]  If it turns out that the Bar Association says they couldn't find any wrongdoing in his activities,
[08:37.960 --> 08:43.480]  and yet you managed to both win a civil and criminal suit against this guy for his activities,
[08:43.480 --> 08:49.360]  I think that would open you up to an opportunity to sue the Bar directly for incompetence,
[08:49.360 --> 08:52.160]  and for covering up the acts of their attorneys.
[08:52.160 --> 09:02.280]  Well, that's what I was going to say, the Bar, I was wondering in Florida, what relationship
[09:02.280 --> 09:09.440]  does the Bar have to the Florida judiciary?
[09:09.440 --> 09:18.400]  They considered a quasi-governmental agency, or are they a private organization?
[09:18.400 --> 09:27.160]  I don't know, they're doing it as the attorney-consumer assistance program, and it's in the Capitol.
[09:27.160 --> 09:32.120]  We need Mark, Mark Adams.
[09:32.120 --> 09:36.600]  I will get ahold of Mark, see if I can get Mark Adams on the next show.
[09:36.600 --> 09:41.760]  Or at least get you in contact with Mark Adams.
[09:41.760 --> 09:50.280]  He is a disbarred attorney in Florida, and we can treat him like a human being because
[09:50.280 --> 09:53.480]  he's disbarred.
[09:53.480 --> 09:57.000]  That returns his humanity to him.
[09:57.000 --> 10:05.400]  I was in the Capitol last Tuesday, and I had the president of the Criminal Lawyers Association
[10:05.400 --> 10:13.600]  for Texas, Austin, and Harris County, and they wanted me to take a photograph of them,
[10:13.600 --> 10:17.400]  so I used their camera and I did, and then I took out mine and I said, I'd like to get
[10:17.400 --> 10:23.360]  a photograph of you guys, but I don't think my listeners would appreciate you standing
[10:23.360 --> 10:24.760]  there like that.
[10:24.760 --> 10:27.920]  They were standing by a railing to a drop-off.
[10:27.920 --> 10:32.280]  I said, they would probably appreciate it more if I got a picture of all three of you
[10:32.280 --> 10:37.440]  jumping over this railing.
[10:37.440 --> 10:38.600]  I had to give them credit.
[10:38.600 --> 10:40.160]  They took my humor well.
[10:40.160 --> 10:44.120]  Actually one of them laid down on the floor and acted like he was dead.
[10:44.120 --> 10:47.720]  I said, yeah, I love that one.
[10:47.720 --> 10:57.280]  Anyway, we need to find out what the bar's relationship is so that you better understand
[10:57.280 --> 11:00.360]  how vulnerable they are to suit.
[11:00.360 --> 11:11.960]  In Florida, Florida is similar to Australia in that Florida maintains the insurance for
[11:11.960 --> 11:13.240]  the lawyers.
[11:13.240 --> 11:19.040]  They don't have outside malpractice insurance.
[11:19.040 --> 11:25.520]  Now when you first hear this, it sounds like, oh goodness, now you have the bar, they'll
[11:25.520 --> 11:27.200]  be protecting these lawyers.
[11:27.200 --> 11:37.880]  Well, if it's anything like Australia, this is a great deal because in Australia, every
[11:37.880 --> 11:45.360]  barrister or solicitor in Australia, you have attorneys and lawyers.
[11:45.360 --> 11:53.040]  Attorneys are private citizens who can represent people in certain administrative procedures,
[11:53.040 --> 11:54.040]  but not lawyers.
[11:54.040 --> 12:01.080]  Lawyers are barristers and solicitors and the barristers are solicitors in order to practice.
[12:01.080 --> 12:11.000]  They have to pay into a fund that the law society maintains to indemnify other barristers
[12:11.000 --> 12:15.400]  or solicitors from civil litigation.
[12:15.400 --> 12:22.640]  So they don't have to have insurance because the law society provides that coverage for
[12:22.640 --> 12:29.520]  them, but the law society gets to use this pool of funds.
[12:29.520 --> 12:36.720]  And when I read about that, I said, oh wow, this is great, law society gets to use these
[12:36.720 --> 12:42.840]  funds so they're not going to want you screwing with it.
[12:42.840 --> 12:49.640]  You get sued and they have to dip in their play money, they are not going to be happy
[12:49.640 --> 12:52.160]  with you.
[12:52.160 --> 12:58.760]  So I expect Florida is going to be similar since the state bar indemnifies the lawyers,
[12:58.760 --> 13:06.120]  the state bar, they collect money from the lawyers for this service and I suspect they
[13:06.120 --> 13:13.520]  have a pool that they will then draw from to pay off any claims.
[13:13.520 --> 13:17.760]  And I fully suspect that the bar is investing this pool and they're not going to want you
[13:17.760 --> 13:19.800]  to get into it.
[13:19.800 --> 13:30.080]  So this may be even better than having a insurance company canceling your malpractice insurance.
[13:30.080 --> 13:34.920]  You may have the bar canceling your coverage and bump you out of the bar.
[13:34.920 --> 13:43.800]  So this may be even more valuable, especially if we can figure out how to include the bar.
[13:43.800 --> 13:47.000]  If they're looking at having to dump a lot of money out of their pool, they're going
[13:47.000 --> 13:49.000]  to be unhappy.
[13:49.000 --> 13:50.000]  Okay.
[13:50.000 --> 13:55.320]  So this could be a lot of fun, you can have a great time here.
[13:55.320 --> 13:57.680]  Well, you're going to be right with me.
[13:57.680 --> 14:07.120]  Okay, I will do that and just having fun tonight because I'm looking at Mark from Wisconsin
[14:07.120 --> 14:11.720]  and I know he's been having way too much fun with this kind of stuff.
[14:11.720 --> 14:14.680]  Okay, Francis, do we have anything else?
[14:14.680 --> 14:17.720]  Nope, my sister will be doing the same thing in Alabama.
[14:17.720 --> 14:19.320]  Oh, wonderful.
[14:19.320 --> 14:22.960]  Okay, have your sister call in.
[14:22.960 --> 14:23.960]  You got it.
[14:23.960 --> 14:24.960]  Thanks, sir.
[14:24.960 --> 14:25.960]  Thank you.
[14:25.960 --> 14:26.960]  Thank you, Francis.
[14:26.960 --> 14:32.960]  Okay, now we're going to go to, oh, looks like I lost, oh, there's Mark.
[14:32.960 --> 14:33.960]  Okay.
[14:33.960 --> 14:34.960]  Going to Mark in Wisconsin.
[14:34.960 --> 14:37.800]  Mark, what do you got for us?
[14:37.800 --> 14:44.840]  Well, something I forgot to mention last time, you, the caller who's dealing with the
[14:44.840 --> 14:55.480]  mortgages and are we losing was wondering if it was me that got lost, but I think it
[14:55.480 --> 14:57.520]  was Mark this time.
[14:57.520 --> 15:00.960]  Okay, this is Mark from Wisconsin.
[15:00.960 --> 15:08.400]  What has probably happened is one of those death collection lawyers that he sued using
[15:08.400 --> 15:13.840]  the Mike Mears method and they had to pay him money to go away.
[15:13.840 --> 15:17.280]  They probably tapping his phone lines.
[15:17.280 --> 15:23.200]  Okay, we're going to go on to Carlos in California.
[15:23.200 --> 15:28.080]  We'll pick up Mark when you come, oh, wait, hold on, hold on, Carlos, I'm, Mark is back
[15:28.080 --> 15:29.080]  on.
[15:29.080 --> 15:31.080]  We're going to pick him back up.
[15:31.080 --> 15:32.080]  Okay.
[15:32.080 --> 15:33.080]  Okay.
[15:33.080 --> 15:37.920]  We were accusing those lawyers you sued on the credit card issues of doing this.
[15:37.920 --> 15:38.920]  Hello?
[15:38.920 --> 15:39.920]  Is it Mark?
[15:39.920 --> 15:40.920]  In my life?
[15:40.920 --> 15:41.920]  Yeah, you're up.
[15:41.920 --> 15:43.920]  Oh, okay.
[15:43.920 --> 15:48.680]  Yeah, when you got bumped off, it was one of those lawyers you sued over the credit card
[15:48.680 --> 15:51.200]  issues that's tapping your phone.
[15:51.200 --> 15:55.560]  Oh, actually, I've got no one lawyers with credit card issues.
[15:55.560 --> 16:04.720]  This is lawyers with case involving piercing a corporate bail, but what I'm going to,
[16:04.720 --> 16:10.480]  what I'm going to talk about though is your mortgage people had, or the gal who was talking
[16:10.480 --> 16:13.480]  about it earlier begins with a V. Leslie.
[16:13.480 --> 16:14.480]  Leslie?
[16:14.480 --> 16:15.480]  Okay.
[16:15.480 --> 16:16.480]  Yes.
[16:16.480 --> 16:21.600]  I was mentioning about tools for managing these cases and information.
[16:21.600 --> 16:27.800]  We're going to recommend two, a free mind and Maltigos case file.
[16:27.800 --> 16:35.600]  I've been using Maltigos case file on a murder investigation and that's quite nice.
[16:35.600 --> 16:37.600]  Maltigos case file.
[16:37.600 --> 16:41.280]  Yes, it's in beta.
[16:41.280 --> 16:42.280]  Hold on.
[16:42.280 --> 16:44.960]  We will pick you up on the other side.
[16:44.960 --> 16:47.200]  You have definitely got my interest.
[16:47.200 --> 16:51.920]  This is Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Eddie Craig, we'll have our radio, call it number
[16:51.920 --> 16:52.920]  512-646-1984.
[16:52.920 --> 16:57.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[16:57.920 --> 17:11.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[17:11.920 --> 17:37.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[17:37.920 --> 18:03.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[18:03.920 --> 18:29.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[18:29.920 --> 18:57.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[18:57.920 --> 19:23.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[19:23.920 --> 19:49.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[19:49.920 --> 20:15.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[20:15.920 --> 20:43.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[20:43.920 --> 21:09.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[21:09.920 --> 21:35.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[21:35.920 --> 22:01.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[22:01.920 --> 22:29.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[22:29.920 --> 22:55.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[22:55.920 --> 23:21.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[23:21.920 --> 23:47.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[23:47.920 --> 24:15.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[24:15.920 --> 24:43.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[24:43.920 --> 25:09.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[25:09.920 --> 25:35.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[25:35.920 --> 26:01.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[26:01.920 --> 26:25.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[26:25.920 --> 26:33.920]  The web page could be hearsay, horse poop, opinion.
[26:33.920 --> 26:47.920]  You can only take judicial notice usually of some accepted official source or some outside source upon which the official capacity relies.
[26:47.920 --> 26:53.920]  You could take judicial notice of the fact that the web page exists.
[26:53.920 --> 26:55.920]  Okay.
[26:55.920 --> 27:07.920]  But you couldn't necessarily take judicial notice of the information in the web page because that may or may not be accurate.
[27:07.920 --> 27:11.920]  It may be opinion. It may not be best evidence.
[27:11.920 --> 27:19.920]  That's what I'm guessing this attorney is going to try and play games with. And that's his job. I can have a bit of respect for that.
[27:19.920 --> 27:33.920]  Now, how do I get the voice recording from my own phone system into the record beyond trickery or entering a transcription and swearing to its authenticity?
[27:33.920 --> 27:48.920]  Okay. I would suggest, and I have been in this position before, one of the ways I got a recording into evidence was I got the attorney to ask me
[27:48.920 --> 27:51.920]  something that gave foundation.
[27:51.920 --> 27:53.920]  Right.
[27:53.920 --> 28:00.920]  Or I quoted precisely what someone had said several years earlier.
[28:00.920 --> 28:01.920]  Okay.
[28:01.920 --> 28:08.920]  And the attorney said, well, Mr. Kelton, you must have a photographic memory. Oh, no. I got a terrible memory.
[28:08.920 --> 28:12.920]  And Mr. Kelton, how do you know this is exactly what he said?
[28:12.920 --> 28:17.920]  Oh, well, I transcribed it from the recording.
[28:17.920 --> 28:24.920]  Objection. Objection. And the judge had his head in his hand already. He saw it coming.
[28:24.920 --> 28:35.920]  And the attorney walked right into it. That is one way. If the recording in this instance is not forbidden by law.
[28:35.920 --> 28:40.920]  One party recording here in Wisconsin. Not to mention the voice.
[28:40.920 --> 28:44.920]  No expectation of privacy.
[28:44.920 --> 28:55.920]  Not the system when you call in the last thing on the voice prompt system says you calls a recorder for quality assurance purposes in my charming melodic voice.
[28:55.920 --> 29:07.920]  Oh, okay. That would establish it. In order to establish foundation, you could.
[29:07.920 --> 29:15.920]  Okay. Is this the situation where you will be doing this in open court with a live witness?
[29:15.920 --> 29:27.920]  The one individual has been dodging service and basically is in default. I have no idea if he'll ever grace the court with his presence.
[29:27.920 --> 29:35.920]  Is there in Texas, if you can demonstrate avoidance of default, that's a felony.
[29:35.920 --> 29:39.920]  I hear that kind of stuff is in Wisconsin, unfortunately for me.
[29:39.920 --> 29:43.920]  Okay. Then you might need to get creative to catch it.
[29:43.920 --> 29:51.920]  Okay. This is Randy Kelsen, David Stevens and Craig. We have the radio. Hang on. We will pick you up on the other side.
[29:51.920 --> 29:56.920]  I call in number 512-646-1984.
[29:56.920 --> 29:59.920]  We'll be looking back.
[29:59.920 --> 30:05.920]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[30:05.920 --> 30:12.920]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:12.920 --> 30:15.920]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:15.920 --> 30:18.920]  And thousands of my fellow force respondents are dying.
[30:18.920 --> 30:19.920]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:19.920 --> 30:20.920]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:20.920 --> 30:21.920]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[30:21.920 --> 30:22.920]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:22.920 --> 30:24.920]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:24.920 --> 30:27.920]  We are Americans and we deserve the truth.
[30:27.920 --> 30:30.920]  Remember Building 7.org today.
[30:58.920 --> 31:05.920]  Attention, listeners. Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books, here with a special announcement.
[31:05.920 --> 31:09.920]  According to the Southern Poverty Law Center's new report titled The Year in Hate and Extremism,
[31:09.920 --> 31:15.920]  in the past three years, the number of patriot groups has grown by 755%.
[31:15.920 --> 31:17.920]  Once again, making the list, Brave New Books.
[31:17.920 --> 31:23.920]  Also, congratulations to Austin's own ruleoflawradio.com for joining the ranks of the SPLC's favorite patriots.
[31:23.920 --> 31:27.920]  And shout out to Debra Medina's weed Texans for making the list as well.
[31:27.920 --> 31:31.920]  In order to show our appreciation for helping keep the bookstore in the front lines of the battle for liberty,
[31:31.920 --> 31:37.920]  for the whole month of April, mention this ad and we'll take 5% off everything in the store.
[31:37.920 --> 31:41.920]  That's right. You can get 5% off the latest in extremist materials.
[31:41.920 --> 31:46.920]  Get your Ron Paul Yard signed or church, one of the last copies of the Oklahoma City bombing's final report,
[31:46.920 --> 31:49.920]  or Charlotte Izabee's Deliver Dumbing Down of America.
[31:49.920 --> 31:53.920]  So come on down and help further the rise of the patriot movement.
[31:53.920 --> 32:22.920]  The bookstore is located at 1904 Guadalupe Street. 5% discount excludes precious metal sales.
[32:22.920 --> 32:37.920]  U.K., we're back. Randy Kelp with Debra Stevens and Craig with La Radio.
[32:37.920 --> 32:41.920]  Then we're talking to Mark in Wisconsin.
[32:41.920 --> 32:47.920]  And this is a need to know more information.
[32:47.920 --> 32:51.920]  Apparently you're going to have to sneak it up on this guy.
[32:51.920 --> 32:57.920]  If he's dodging service, sometimes you have to get creative to get him served.
[32:57.920 --> 33:00.920]  What does this guy do for a living?
[33:00.920 --> 33:06.920]  Well, he's an older gentleman, semi-retired.
[33:06.920 --> 33:15.920]  He's basically acting as a front for a corporation that the ownership stake doesn't like paying their bills.
[33:15.920 --> 33:22.920]  The state has a provision where if you can't get somebody served, you can publish it in the paper.
[33:22.920 --> 33:24.920]  It's been published in the paper.
[33:24.920 --> 33:32.920]  So the state has decided that yes, he qualifies for a default judgment in the case at this point.
[33:32.920 --> 33:42.920]  Perhaps I can get the judge to accept it as a fact because the person who would give the color fact isn't showing up.
[33:42.920 --> 33:45.920]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[33:45.920 --> 33:47.920]  Can you...
[33:47.920 --> 34:03.920]  Okay, so you want to introduce a recorded conversation where the other party is not able to rebut because he's not being able to be served.
[34:03.920 --> 34:08.920]  Do you have any idea where this third party is?
[34:08.920 --> 34:13.920]  He's here in the local area, I'm sure.
[34:13.920 --> 34:23.920]  Wait a minute. What are his favorite... Do you know what he does? Does he play golf? Does he be a sports enthusiast? Does he go to the opera?
[34:23.920 --> 34:27.920]  No idea on those things.
[34:27.920 --> 34:31.920]  Let me tell you a little interesting story.
[34:31.920 --> 34:42.920]  I had a friend who came home one day and found on his porch a box.
[34:42.920 --> 34:52.920]  And in that box was a two tickets to a Dallas Cowboys home game.
[34:52.920 --> 34:59.920]  And a letter that said, you were not home, my car broke down.
[34:59.920 --> 35:10.920]  I came onto your property and took the battery off of your tractor and used it to start a car with.
[35:10.920 --> 35:15.920]  Since I couldn't ask you, it felt like I owed you something.
[35:15.920 --> 35:25.920]  So here are two tickets to the Cowboys home game to show my appreciation.
[35:25.920 --> 35:30.920]  While he was at the game, they came and stole everything he had in the house.
[35:30.920 --> 35:36.920]  But the point of the story was they knew exactly where he was going to be.
[35:36.920 --> 35:49.920]  So if you knew what this guy did or what he liked, you might send him a ticket to the opera and be standing there when he shows up.
[35:49.920 --> 36:08.920]  But if you really have to get him into court, but if not, I would think that a death position, you have to do with established foundation.
[36:08.920 --> 36:15.920]  Or if they put you on the stand or if you can do this in a pleading.
[36:15.920 --> 36:35.920]  And in the pleading offered the an affidavit stating that on your telephone, you have an automatic recording device that includes the following disclaimer or warning that warns people that this conversation is being recorded.
[36:35.920 --> 36:45.920]  And in using this recording device, you received a call or you made a call to this number.
[36:45.920 --> 36:51.920]  See telephone company records of dates so and so.
[36:51.920 --> 36:56.920]  The third party showing that the call was actually made and connected.
[36:56.920 --> 37:06.920]  And during the process of this phone call, your system recorded this conversation. That's how you can get it in.
[37:06.920 --> 37:15.920]  Okay. Well, I'm kind of thinking the judge might be interested because ultimately the one party is a registered agent for the corporation.
[37:15.920 --> 37:23.920]  And the main party that's being sued in this intercepted his summons and complaint to show up in court.
[37:23.920 --> 37:29.920]  Okay. Did this involve a conversation between two human beings?
[37:29.920 --> 37:35.920]  Yes, it did. Myself and the person who the mail was intercepted from.
[37:35.920 --> 37:44.920]  Okay. Then all you need to do is present, offer a transcript of the conversation.
[37:44.920 --> 37:46.920]  Okay. Great.
[37:46.920 --> 37:55.920]  Transcript of the conversation. I had this conversation with this person. And in this conversation, this is exactly what was said.
[37:55.920 --> 37:58.920]  That's what I did to this lawyer in court.
[37:58.920 --> 38:06.920]  Okay. I said this, he said that. I said this, he said that. This was a couple of years earlier.
[38:06.920 --> 38:15.920]  And just left that. You know, if you do that, the lawyer, if he's really smart, he's going to know what it is.
[38:15.920 --> 38:22.920]  And he's not going to be stupid enough to question your veracity.
[38:22.920 --> 38:24.920]  I don't hope.
[38:24.920 --> 38:27.920]  And that's, well, no, you hope he does.
[38:27.920 --> 38:29.920]  Well, okay.
[38:29.920 --> 38:39.920]  If he does, you know, if he questions how you know this is so like this moron attorney, I'm telling him exactly the conversation.
[38:39.920 --> 38:47.920]  And he would ask me one question. I said, I said this and Mr Woodward Woodard said this.
[38:47.920 --> 38:54.920]  And the lawyer said, are you sure that's exactly what he said? I am certain that's exactly what he said.
[38:54.920 --> 39:05.920]  And then he'd go to the next one. And about the third time he said, are you sure the judge kind of ducked his head, put his head in his hand because he could see it coming.
[39:05.920 --> 39:13.920]  The lawyer never snapped. And then finally the lawyer got frustrated because he couldn't get me to stumble.
[39:13.920 --> 39:17.920]  And he said, Mr Cowan, you must have a perfect memory. Oh, no, I have a terrible memory.
[39:17.920 --> 39:25.920]  And the judge just he ducked his head, put both hands on his head. Oh, no, I'm not going to watch this.
[39:25.920 --> 39:35.920]  Oh, I got it from the recording. It's a transcript objection. And the judge said, oh, Kelso, you opened the door.
[39:35.920 --> 39:43.920]  Mr Kelso gets to walk through it. So you hope he raises the injection.
[39:43.920 --> 39:59.920]  And this is what I've suggested on the show before. Even if you're in a state where you're not allowed to record, recorded any transcribe it and then destroy the recording.
[39:59.920 --> 40:15.920]  Then you can testify. Absolutely. This is exactly what was said. And as they push you on how you know, well, I had a recorder, but I didn't realize at the time that I was in the wrong state and I couldn't record.
[40:15.920 --> 40:29.920]  So immediately after the conversation, I realized I had the recording. So I destroyed it immediately and then wrote out exactly what was said.
[40:29.920 --> 40:33.920]  But here you don't have that problem. Right. Okay.
[40:33.920 --> 40:50.920]  Just by entering the transcript of the recording in affidavit form of this is precisely what was said. Any attempt to discredit the transcript will give you foundation to enter the recording.
[40:50.920 --> 41:09.920]  Okay. All right. The bar grievance on how to format this one. The attorney has been requested in a discovery motion that's aged well aged 30 plus days to turn over business records, which of course would show the piercing of the corporate veil.
[41:09.920 --> 41:21.920]  He is arguing or he told me that he's going to argue that there are nothing in my pleadings showing that the corporate veil is pierced. Therefore, he's going to argue in case thrown out.
[41:21.920 --> 41:38.920]  But of course, he's sitting on the records that will show the corporate veil being pierced. Is there a bar grievance buried in there that's failure to speak with candor to the court?
[41:38.920 --> 41:43.920]  Beautiful. I like the way that one sounds.
[41:43.920 --> 41:59.920]  Go to bargrievous.net. Now, it's not really good at creating the bar grievance yet. However, I do have the American Bar Association standards in questionnaire format.
[41:59.920 --> 42:17.920]  You can go down through them quickly. And that's the first thing that comes to mind. But if you go through those, it asks questions. Did the attorney exhibit the amount of knowledge and expertise sufficient to properly dedicate the case?
[42:17.920 --> 42:23.920]  You just walk down through them. You may find some that's more directly on point.
[42:23.920 --> 42:36.920]  It's really fast. I was writing a document and I needed the Fairdick Collections Practices Act. I also have it in questionnaire format.
[42:36.920 --> 42:54.920]  And I remembered that if a debt collector makes a statement, it makes a threat of an action he claims he intends to take but doesn't really intend to take the action or doesn't have the authority to take the action, it's a violation.
[42:54.920 --> 43:01.920]  But I had no idea who it was. I opened that questionnaire. It took me 30 seconds. I was right on it.
[43:01.920 --> 43:21.920]  So you'll be able to look at the headings and such and get to your issue very quickly. And then I suggest that when you wipe the grievance and you say the lawyer failed to exhibit the knowledge and expertise required,
[43:21.920 --> 43:31.920]  it ends the verbiage of the standard that he violated. That'll keep him from calling it a frivolous filing.
[43:31.920 --> 43:38.920]  But look in there. That'll be a great resource. Okay. Do you have anything else for us?
[43:38.920 --> 43:41.920]  I do have two others that should be real quick.
[43:41.920 --> 43:52.920]  Okay. Okay. Good. Hang on. We will pick you up on the other side. This is Randy Kaltenberg with Stephen Z. Craig. We'll look at the radio. We'll look right back on the other side.
[44:11.920 --> 44:22.920]  Now in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.920 --> 44:33.920]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:33.920 --> 44:42.920]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.920 --> 44:51.920]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[44:51.920 --> 45:00.920]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EASY.
[45:00.920 --> 45:09.920]  The Oklahoma City bombing. Top 10 reasons to question the official story. Reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices.
[45:09.920 --> 45:16.920]  On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McBay and the Ryder truck report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators.
[45:16.920 --> 45:24.920]  The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McBay alone delivered the Ryder truck bomb to the Murrah Building and detonated it.
[45:24.920 --> 45:32.920]  The only witness the government produced to place McBay at the building that morning, Dana Bradley, who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing,
[45:32.920 --> 45:38.920]  testified that she saw McBay with another man, the fable John Doe number two, exiting the Ryder truck.
[45:38.920 --> 45:50.920]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McBay with other perpetrators the day of the bombing, no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing,
[45:50.920 --> 45:56.920]  including when he rented the Ryder truck, and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:56.920 --> 46:22.920]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:22.920 --> 46:42.920]  Okay, we're back.
[46:42.920 --> 46:54.920]  We're talking to Mark in Wisconsin, and Mark, when we started talking, I have another Mark in Wisconsin.
[46:54.920 --> 47:14.920]  I thought he was you. He has taken on the credit card people with using the Mike Beers method. One of them paid him $6,000 to go away and leave him alone. The other one paid him $3,500, and he was complaining that he ran out of credit cards.
[47:14.920 --> 47:36.920]  So you are not that Mike, so there was some confusion in the beginning. You had a couple other questions.
[47:36.920 --> 47:56.920]  Oh, go to LogosRadio.com or to RulaLawRadio.com and click on RulaLawRadio. Click on the blue banner. It's Mike Mearris. This is the guy out of New Mexico.
[47:56.920 --> 48:16.920]  He kicks their behinds. He'll show you how to set them up. We get people calling in saying how the death collector is harassing me with phone calls and such.
[48:16.920 --> 48:28.920]  They call you out to set them up so that every time they call you, you get tickled and you put a mark on your ledger. That's $1,000.
[48:28.920 --> 48:40.920]  Once you get enough civil rights violations to outweigh the amount that they're claiming against you, then you sue them in the federal court.
[48:40.920 --> 48:52.920]  Logos, Deborah Stevens, a credit card company went after her husband. They checked her credit and then they started calling her. She sued them for $300,000.
[48:52.920 --> 49:04.920]  They paid her $25,000 and dismissed the debt on the credit card to get her to leave them alone. This is using the Mike Mearris method.
[49:04.920 --> 49:16.920]  We deal with RulaLaw and in doing this show, we get a lot of people come to us wanting us to promote their methods and processes.
[49:16.920 --> 49:28.920]  If you look over our site, you'll see we promote very few. We are extremely careful. I am a creature of statute.
[49:28.920 --> 49:40.920]  I do not do patriot mythology well at all. When we put one on the site, we are certain that these guys know what they're doing.
[49:40.920 --> 49:46.920]  Mike Mearris has never disappointed us.
[49:46.920 --> 50:03.920]  Now, this particular thing, Eddie should enjoy a little bit more. In this particular case, the attorney for the other side sent a letter and a motion to reopen and that letter and motion isn't actually in the court paperwork.
[50:03.920 --> 50:13.920]  There's references to the process that happened after the letter was sent. The letter and the motion are not actually in the paperwork.
[50:13.920 --> 50:19.920]  Hold on. I'm confused.
[50:19.920 --> 50:25.920]  Don't feel bad about that though. He's usually very confused.
[50:25.920 --> 50:33.920]  That's true. The lawyer is making a motion that's not in the paperwork.
[50:33.920 --> 50:36.920]  Yes, that is correct.
[50:36.920 --> 50:44.920]  We explain how that's working. How is he making a motion if he hasn't put the motion before the court?
[50:44.920 --> 50:55.920]  The letter was sent today to me and the court and a couple days later, the court went ahead and said, oh, yes, that default judgment.
[50:55.920 --> 51:00.920]  Yes, we're just going to vacate that and proceed like there was no default judgment.
[51:00.920 --> 51:06.920]  So the court essentially suesponte without a motion?
[51:06.920 --> 51:11.920]  I mean, is that a hearing?
[51:11.920 --> 51:18.920]  You said it wasn't before the court. How is it not before the court?
[51:18.920 --> 51:22.920]  It's not in the court record.
[51:22.920 --> 51:31.920]  It hasn't been filed, Randy.
[51:31.920 --> 51:40.920]  We kind of miss you. When you talk and we're talking, we have systems here that will push your voice down under us.
[51:40.920 --> 51:43.920]  So I didn't hear what you last said.
[51:43.920 --> 51:55.920]  It's missing. So there was apparently the only, the notes in it said, talk to attorney, going to do this.
[51:55.920 --> 52:01.920]  Did the document he sent to you have a court stamp on it?
[52:01.920 --> 52:03.920]  No.
[52:03.920 --> 52:10.920]  Then that was a private correspondence. Did he send a similar private correspondence to the court?
[52:10.920 --> 52:18.920]  In the private correspondence he sent to me, it was copied as going to the court.
[52:18.920 --> 52:25.920]  If the court paid any attention to it, you should file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge.
[52:25.920 --> 52:33.920]  That is my plan. I'm just wondering how I should phrase it when I have my court.
[52:33.920 --> 52:36.920]  Well, let's start with, hey, stupid.
[52:36.920 --> 52:44.920]  Let's start with the, with asking the judge to disqualify himself for cause.
[52:44.920 --> 53:00.920]  And you might look at going to the local grand jury or to the, to the district attorney and ask him to prostitute, initiate prosecution against the judge for official misconduct,
[53:00.920 --> 53:08.920]  for conspiring with counsel, with opposing counsel to deny you in due process.
[53:08.920 --> 53:10.920]  Okay.
[53:10.920 --> 53:20.920]  This is something, no attorney does this. They don't have, but if you're prosaic, you don't have this problem.
[53:20.920 --> 53:26.920]  You have powers and abilities far beyond those of normal attorneys.
[53:26.920 --> 53:40.920]  But if the judge is acting outside the judicial context and denying you in a right that you have, that's criminal.
[53:40.920 --> 53:42.920]  Okay.
[53:42.920 --> 53:49.920]  People tend to think, well, that's not right. And I tend to think that's criminal.
[53:49.920 --> 53:57.920]  And that's what we have a district attorney for. And you go to the district attorney and he's going to refuse to act.
[53:57.920 --> 54:00.920]  At least you hope he does.
[54:00.920 --> 54:08.920]  And then I would suggest that you take, you take a criminal complaint against this judge to the district attorney.
[54:08.920 --> 54:14.920]  Get the district attorney to refuse to prosecute the judge.
[54:14.920 --> 54:22.920]  Then take a criminal complaint against the district attorney to the chief justice of the Supreme Court.
[54:22.920 --> 54:24.920]  Okay.
[54:24.920 --> 54:32.920]  And invoke his duty as a magistrate.
[54:32.920 --> 54:46.920]  And when he refuses to act, he's going to send you a really polite letter in treating you to take your complaint to the sheriff's department.
[54:46.920 --> 54:51.920]  And you can send him back a thank you letter that you appreciate his sage advice.
[54:51.920 --> 55:04.920]  At the same time, present criminal complaints to the district to the grand jury against the chief justice of the Supreme Court for misfeasance in office.
[55:04.920 --> 55:08.920]  Now, you're not going to get him prosecuted.
[55:08.920 --> 55:17.920]  What you are is going to get him annoyed at the prosecutor attorney for getting him in this spot.
[55:17.920 --> 55:19.920]  Okay.
[55:19.920 --> 55:22.920]  This is politics. This is not law.
[55:22.920 --> 55:24.920]  Right.
[55:24.920 --> 55:29.920]  So this is a career. You can do that outside the case you're in.
[55:29.920 --> 55:30.920]  Okay.
[55:30.920 --> 55:35.920]  That has, technically, that has nothing to do with the case you're in.
[55:35.920 --> 55:45.920]  That if anybody inside the case mentions it, that's tampering with the witness obstruction of justice.
[55:45.920 --> 55:50.920]  Okay. This gets real serious real fast.
[55:50.920 --> 56:05.920]  And if everybody gets worried, now you are far more dangerous to people around them than you are to the lawyer on the other side.
[56:05.920 --> 56:07.920]  Does that make sense?
[56:07.920 --> 56:09.920]  Oh, yes. Oh, yes.
[56:09.920 --> 56:15.920]  The last one is how to steer their little boat into the rocky shores.
[56:15.920 --> 56:21.920]  Usually, the main defendant, when he starts losing cases, he goes limp.
[56:21.920 --> 56:31.920]  He just stops showing up. His attorney suddenly finds that their mother's died, couldn't make it because of flat tires, whatever.
[56:31.920 --> 56:42.920]  How do I make sure that they regret that decision? Because now that they filed the, to reopen this case from a default decision,
[56:42.920 --> 56:50.920]  and then are acting in a manner to bring about a default after, you know, they've started some litigation.
[56:50.920 --> 56:53.920]  How do I make that stick hard? How do I...
[56:53.920 --> 56:57.920]  Sanctions. Sanctions. Build them for your time.
[56:57.920 --> 57:01.920]  That was what I was thinking of doing, was doing them for my time.
[57:01.920 --> 57:12.920]  There is a document, I'll have to dig it out, where you notice them of how much you charge per hour for your time.
[57:12.920 --> 57:13.920]  Okay.
[57:13.920 --> 57:17.920]  In the United States, P and N is forbidden.
[57:17.920 --> 57:23.920]  You cannot be forced to, you can't be subject to forced labor.
[57:23.920 --> 57:31.920]  And if the court orders you to be in court on a given day at a given time, that's forced labor.
[57:31.920 --> 57:39.920]  If the other side doesn't show up and you have to expend this time for no purpose, so build them for it.
[57:39.920 --> 57:44.920]  But first, notice them of how much you cost per hour.
[57:44.920 --> 57:47.920]  And you can pull that out of your hat.
[57:47.920 --> 57:55.920]  Once they have noticed, then if they take action that costs you this time, you just build them for it.
[57:55.920 --> 57:56.920]  Okay.
[57:56.920 --> 58:01.920]  And you don't even have to ask the judge for sanctions. Just build them for the time.
[58:01.920 --> 58:05.920]  And that's something you can adjudicate in the court separately.
[58:05.920 --> 58:07.920]  That would be great fun.
[58:07.920 --> 58:10.920]  And this evening, thank you very much gentlemen.
[58:10.920 --> 58:13.920]  You are most welcome. Thank you Mark.
[58:13.920 --> 58:20.920]  When we come back, we're going to go to, if we lose Carlos and we have Carlos, we're going to get Carlos in California.
[58:20.920 --> 58:23.920]  This is, we're going to the top of the hour break.
[58:23.920 --> 58:28.920]  This is Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Eddie Craig, Bill Gloridio.
[58:28.920 --> 58:33.920]  Our call in number is 512-666-1984.
[58:33.920 --> 58:37.920]  Give us a call. We're going into our last hour.
[58:37.920 --> 58:40.920]  So get in line quickly so we can get to you.
[58:40.920 --> 58:44.920]  Carlos, Leon, Neil, Jay, we see you there.
[58:44.920 --> 58:49.920]  Stefan, we'll pick you up when we come back on the other side.
[58:49.920 --> 58:52.920]  We'll be right back.
[58:59.920 --> 59:07.920]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[59:07.920 --> 59:11.920]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:11.920 --> 59:15.920]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:15.920 --> 59:18.920]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:18.920 --> 59:22.920]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:22.920 --> 59:27.920]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:27.920 --> 59:31.920]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:31.920 --> 59:37.920]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:37.920 --> 59:42.920]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:42.920 --> 59:53.920]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:53.920 --> 59:57.920]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:57.920 --> 01:00:01.920]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:27.920 --> 01:00:50.920]  When the soccer fans cry because of government spies, that's appalling.
[01:00:50.920 --> 01:00:54.920]  In Italy, soccer fans need government permission to attend a game.
[01:00:54.920 --> 01:00:58.920]  The government's requiring electronic ID cards for seasoned ticket holders
[01:00:58.920 --> 01:01:03.920]  to control what games they attend and where they can sit, based on which team they support.
[01:01:03.920 --> 01:01:07.920]  Getting a card requires a government ID number, a photo, and a ton of paperwork.
[01:01:07.920 --> 01:01:14.920]  Sports fans are closely monitored by security agents who block stadium entrances and scan everyone's ID.
[01:01:14.920 --> 01:01:19.920]  Anyone caught misbehaving is banned from attending soccer games for five years.
[01:01:19.920 --> 01:01:21.920]  Mussolini would have loved it.
[01:01:21.920 --> 01:01:30.920]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:30.920 --> 01:01:34.920]  You've heard of getting your shots, but have you heard of getting shot if you don't?
[01:01:34.920 --> 01:01:47.920]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back to tell you just how far some public health officials will go to vaccinate kids.
[01:01:47.920 --> 01:01:52.920]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.920 --> 01:01:57.920]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.920 --> 01:02:02.920]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.920 --> 01:02:05.920]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.920 --> 01:02:12.920]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:12.920 --> 01:02:19.920]  Around 10% of parents in the U.S. opt out of measles vaccines for their kids, according to the Centers for Disease Control.
[01:02:19.920 --> 01:02:23.920]  Some worry about side effects and others have religious or medical objections.
[01:02:23.920 --> 01:02:27.920]  But in the African nation of Malawi, there are no exceptions.
[01:02:27.920 --> 01:02:36.920]  Members of the Zion and Itumi churches found this out the hard way when police rounded up over 100 of their children at gunpoint and forced them to be vaccinated.
[01:02:36.920 --> 01:02:39.920]  In Malawi, holdouts go to jail.
[01:02:39.920 --> 01:02:45.920]  One father was sentenced to prison and two years hard labor because his religion forbids vaccines.
[01:02:45.920 --> 01:02:48.920]  Man, I'm glad to live in the land of the free.
[01:02:48.920 --> 01:03:10.920]  Check out Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:18.920 --> 01:03:30.920]  We're back.
[01:03:30.920 --> 01:03:44.920]  Before we go back in, I need to make a correction.
[01:03:44.920 --> 01:03:56.920]  I wasn't supposed to mention the start with, so forget you heard anything about that.
[01:03:56.920 --> 01:04:02.920]  Okay, we're going to go to Carlos in California.
[01:04:02.920 --> 01:04:09.920]  Carlos, you finally called us in, called in before the last segment. Wonderful.
[01:04:09.920 --> 01:04:15.920]  I've been on hot for a while, but it's fine. Thank you.
[01:04:15.920 --> 01:04:22.920]  We're having a problem in California, district court on foreclosures, and I knew I was going to have this problem.
[01:04:22.920 --> 01:04:26.920]  I mentioned this here about two or three weeks ago.
[01:04:26.920 --> 01:04:29.920]  I think I did a great job on my pleadings.
[01:04:29.920 --> 01:04:39.920]  Everything very clearly, and everything very organized, and they denied me.
[01:04:39.920 --> 01:04:44.920]  They did a motion to dismiss, and it was granted.
[01:04:44.920 --> 01:04:54.920]  But my question is this, how can they grant everything even though when I have evidence of fraud and all that stuff?
[01:04:54.920 --> 01:05:04.920]  They're going to give you another chance, right? But what is the secret to not getting that thing dismissed?
[01:05:04.920 --> 01:05:09.920]  There is no secret. The courts are corrupt.
[01:05:09.920 --> 01:05:16.920]  You can expect the court to rule against you out of hand at every turn. You have to expect that.
[01:05:16.920 --> 01:05:21.920]  What you're doing in the trial court is you're setting the record for appeal.
[01:05:21.920 --> 01:05:26.920]  And I suggest you do two appeals.
[01:05:26.920 --> 01:05:31.920]  You appeal to the court of appeals to overturn the judge's bogus ruling,
[01:05:31.920 --> 01:05:44.920]  and you appeal to a grand jury of your peers to indict the judge for denying you in your right to a fair jurist in the first instance.
[01:05:44.920 --> 01:05:59.920]  These judges will do anything they want to until you and I stand up and kick them right, squaring their professional teeth.
[01:05:59.920 --> 01:06:03.920]  They feel like they answer to no one.
[01:06:03.920 --> 01:06:09.920]  You need to demonstrate to them that they do answer to someone.
[01:06:09.920 --> 01:06:16.920]  Now, I know what the next comment is going to be. Well, they don't let me get to the grand jury. That's okay.
[01:06:16.920 --> 01:06:20.920]  You go down there and make grand jury noises.
[01:06:20.920 --> 01:06:26.920]  Maybe you can get the judge to be stupid enough to say something about it.
[01:06:26.920 --> 01:06:31.920]  Then you get to go after him for tapping with the witness obstruction of justice.
[01:06:31.920 --> 01:06:37.920]  Nobody has gone after the judges for their misbehavior.
[01:06:37.920 --> 01:06:41.920]  We just complain about the judges for their misbehavior.
[01:06:41.920 --> 01:06:49.920]  If a judge fails to determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence,
[01:06:49.920 --> 01:06:59.920]  and then apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case, then he's committing a criminal act.
[01:06:59.920 --> 01:07:05.920]  This is not just wrong. It's downright criminal and he belongs in prison.
[01:07:05.920 --> 01:07:11.920]  Not sitting up there in the sanctimony of self-righteous posture on the bench.
[01:07:11.920 --> 01:07:25.920]  I would definitely suggest that you ask a grand jury to decide whether they think the judge denied you and your rights or not.
[01:07:25.920 --> 01:07:35.920]  What do you think of this?
[01:07:35.920 --> 01:07:43.920]  Did the judge give you findings of facts and conclusions at law?
[01:07:43.920 --> 01:07:51.920]  In his decision, was there a memorandum?
[01:07:51.920 --> 01:07:57.920]  I don't think he even wrote the order. It comes in a pleading.
[01:07:57.920 --> 01:08:03.920]  I think the attorneys did it. I'm almost sure because that's what they do to us in the district.
[01:08:03.920 --> 01:08:07.920]  No, wait. That's not the question.
[01:08:07.920 --> 01:08:15.920]  Did he give you points in authorities as to why he ruled against you?
[01:08:15.920 --> 01:08:25.920]  The only thing that he says, it wasn't clear and I said the same thing in my second amendment complaint
[01:08:25.920 --> 01:08:33.920]  because I did my complaint and then before they answered, I re-amended it. That's all he said.
[01:08:33.920 --> 01:08:37.920]  Did you consider it to be clear?
[01:08:37.920 --> 01:08:47.920]  Yes, I did. I moved to have the judge disqualify himself for incompetence.
[01:08:47.920 --> 01:08:51.920]  Can I do that?
[01:08:51.920 --> 01:08:57.920]  Yes, you can do that. If the judge is incompetent to read or clearly written legal pleading and make sense of it,
[01:08:57.920 --> 01:09:03.920]  he needs to stand down from the bench and get someone in there who can.
[01:09:03.920 --> 01:09:09.920]  Let me say something else. I was following another attorney.
[01:09:09.920 --> 01:09:15.920]  I was following an attorney. Obviously, I'm not an attorney. He was doing real good.
[01:09:15.920 --> 01:09:21.920]  I told my brother, let's go meet him. Let's see how this judge works.
[01:09:21.920 --> 01:09:29.920]  We're going to see what to expect. Before the hearing he vacated the hearing.
[01:09:29.920 --> 01:09:39.920]  In chambers, he did the decision. No one's supposed to come in. No one has to come in.
[01:09:39.920 --> 01:09:48.920]  But I know that the other attorneys for the bank, they did the order.
[01:09:48.920 --> 01:09:53.920]  Wait a minute. You didn't make sense. You said you were following another attorney.
[01:09:53.920 --> 01:09:55.920]  Was this not your case?
[01:09:55.920 --> 01:10:01.920]  The other attorney, right? I'm sorry. I didn't get a little mixed up.
[01:10:01.920 --> 01:10:07.920]  I was following another attorney to see how this rule and this court operates.
[01:10:07.920 --> 01:10:13.920]  Then see what was going to happen with that attorney and say they are wrong.
[01:10:13.920 --> 01:10:17.920]  If I get in trouble, I'll get some advice from this attorney.
[01:10:17.920 --> 01:10:25.920]  He was going to go to his meeting and he was also vacated for no reason and no appearance needed.
[01:10:25.920 --> 01:10:31.920]  They are doing it to everybody. That's what I'm trying to say.
[01:10:31.920 --> 01:10:35.920]  Oh, criminally against the judge.
[01:10:35.920 --> 01:10:45.920]  Accused the judge of conspiring with the banks and take this to a grand jury.
[01:10:45.920 --> 01:10:52.920]  In California, grand juries have a lot more power than in most states.
[01:10:52.920 --> 01:10:59.920]  In Texas, we have a court of inquiry.
[01:10:59.920 --> 01:11:03.920]  We can't get one invoked, but we have laws that authorize this one.
[01:11:03.920 --> 01:11:12.920]  In California, you have a grand jury that can investigate into public officials' behaviors.
[01:11:12.920 --> 01:11:19.920]  Take the behavior of these judges to a grand jury and ask them to indict them.
[01:11:19.920 --> 01:11:24.920]  Okay. Sounds like a good... This is what I'm going to do.
[01:11:24.920 --> 01:11:28.920]  I'm going to follow up. I'm going to re-amend it.
[01:11:28.920 --> 01:11:35.920]  I'm going to do my homework for 30 days. I'm going to re-amend it and then do everything by the buck.
[01:11:35.920 --> 01:11:39.920]  If he throws me out, I'm just going to go ahead and follow up with that.
[01:11:39.920 --> 01:11:43.920]  You aren't doing everything by the book now.
[01:11:43.920 --> 01:11:51.920]  Because the first time the judge rendered a bogus ruling by the book, you should have charged him criminally.
[01:11:51.920 --> 01:11:57.920]  Yeah. Well, he says, because you know what? I came up with... I brought in the... I brought everything.
[01:11:57.920 --> 01:12:02.920]  I threw the bug at them and nothing that I did worked. I had...
[01:12:02.920 --> 01:12:05.920]  Yes. You're telling me the same thing.
[01:12:05.920 --> 01:12:06.920]  Okay.
[01:12:06.920 --> 01:12:08.920]  The judge is a criminal.
[01:12:08.920 --> 01:12:09.920]  Okay.
[01:12:09.920 --> 01:12:18.920]  Do you really think that if you do enough homework and find enough law and structure it just exactly right
[01:12:18.920 --> 01:12:22.920]  that all of a sudden that judge is stopped being a criminal?
[01:12:22.920 --> 01:12:24.920]  Yeah. Yeah. You're right.
[01:12:24.920 --> 01:12:30.920]  Okay. Can I ask you something real quick and I have a little bit of goodness also?
[01:12:30.920 --> 01:12:32.920]  Okay. Good. Yes. Go ahead.
[01:12:32.920 --> 01:12:37.920]  Okay. I have a friend of mine that is staying his home. Right? He's fine.
[01:12:37.920 --> 01:12:41.920]  He doesn't have a problem. But then the...
[01:12:41.920 --> 01:12:46.920]  Wells Fargo decided that they wanted to pay the property taxes and he says,
[01:12:46.920 --> 01:12:48.920]  you're not going to pay my property taxes.
[01:12:48.920 --> 01:12:53.920]  So, Wells Fargo decided to go ahead and pay the property taxes.
[01:12:53.920 --> 01:13:05.920]  If he's ignoring them, he's just sending the normal payment without the property taxes added to it and therefore closing it in.
[01:13:05.920 --> 01:13:07.920]  This doesn't make sense.
[01:13:07.920 --> 01:13:09.920]  I know. See...
[01:13:09.920 --> 01:13:10.920]  Oh, wait a minute.
[01:13:10.920 --> 01:13:12.920]  He's paying his home normal...
[01:13:12.920 --> 01:13:17.920]  Oh, okay. Wells Fargo is billing him for property taxes.
[01:13:17.920 --> 01:13:18.920]  Yes.
[01:13:18.920 --> 01:13:22.920]  Is there an escrow agreement in the contract?
[01:13:22.920 --> 01:13:23.920]  Okay.
[01:13:23.920 --> 01:13:24.920]  I'm not sure.
[01:13:24.920 --> 01:13:28.920]  Where Wells Fargo is required to pay the property taxes?
[01:13:28.920 --> 01:13:31.920]  No, because he was paying him on his own.
[01:13:31.920 --> 01:13:41.920]  And then suddenly he fell back and now they're paying it, but there was no agreement.
[01:13:41.920 --> 01:13:45.920]  I need you to read the contract very carefully.
[01:13:45.920 --> 01:13:46.920]  Okay.
[01:13:46.920 --> 01:13:47.920]  So, that's what I'm...
[01:13:47.920 --> 01:13:56.920]  Wells Fargo has to cover the property taxes because that's a lien that will stand in front of theirs.
[01:13:56.920 --> 01:13:57.920]  Okay.
[01:13:57.920 --> 01:14:05.920]  And he's required to pay any...pay off any lien that would stand in front of Wells Fargo's lien.
[01:14:05.920 --> 01:14:06.920]  Okay.
[01:14:06.920 --> 01:14:07.920]  Okay.
[01:14:07.920 --> 01:14:09.920]  According to the deed of trust.
[01:14:09.920 --> 01:14:10.920]  Okay.
[01:14:10.920 --> 01:14:16.920]  So, was he paying the property taxes?
[01:14:16.920 --> 01:14:21.920]  On the property taxes and they decided they were going to pay him whether he wanted it or not.
[01:14:21.920 --> 01:14:22.920]  And so...
[01:14:22.920 --> 01:14:25.920]  So, was he still paying the property taxes?
[01:14:25.920 --> 01:14:32.920]  No, he's not paying the property taxes because he says, I did not give you permission to pay them for me.
[01:14:32.920 --> 01:14:35.920]  Therefore, you paid it for me for free.
[01:14:35.920 --> 01:14:36.920]  So, he says...
[01:14:36.920 --> 01:14:37.920]  Okay.
[01:14:37.920 --> 01:14:38.920]  Before you get in trouble.
[01:14:38.920 --> 01:14:39.920]  Okay.
[01:14:39.920 --> 01:14:40.920]  He needs to read the contract.
[01:14:40.920 --> 01:14:48.920]  He will find a provision in the contract that requires him to pay these taxes.
[01:14:48.920 --> 01:14:55.920]  And the fact that Wells Fargo decided to pay them, he is still required to pay them.
[01:14:55.920 --> 01:15:10.920]  So, if Wells Fargo gives them to the registrar as the tax assessor, then he would be obligated to pay Wells Fargo back.
[01:15:10.920 --> 01:15:12.920]  Okay.
[01:15:12.920 --> 01:15:19.920]  So, it's not likely to have a leg to stand on there, but there's a lot of other legs he's got to stand on.
[01:15:19.920 --> 01:15:20.920]  Right.
[01:15:20.920 --> 01:15:21.920]  Okay.
[01:15:21.920 --> 01:15:22.920]  Okay.
[01:15:22.920 --> 01:15:26.920]  I'm going to have to read the deed of trust and whatever agreement he has.
[01:15:26.920 --> 01:15:27.920]  Yeah.
[01:15:27.920 --> 01:15:28.920]  Yeah.
[01:15:28.920 --> 01:15:29.920]  Read it carefully.
[01:15:29.920 --> 01:15:30.920]  The deed of trust is going to...
[01:15:30.920 --> 01:15:32.920]  I think it's paragraph nine.
[01:15:32.920 --> 01:15:33.920]  Paragraph nine?
[01:15:33.920 --> 01:15:37.920]  It's going to require him to pay...
[01:15:37.920 --> 01:15:43.920]  You need to pay off any lien that would stand before Wells Fargo sitting.
[01:15:43.920 --> 01:15:44.920]  Okay.
[01:15:44.920 --> 01:15:47.920]  And that would be a tax lien would do that.
[01:15:47.920 --> 01:15:48.920]  Okay.
[01:15:48.920 --> 01:15:49.920]  Okay.
[01:15:49.920 --> 01:15:52.920]  Now, something that I think is highly interesting.
[01:15:52.920 --> 01:15:53.920]  Okay.
[01:15:53.920 --> 01:15:56.920]  Did you know that the United States...
[01:15:56.920 --> 01:16:01.920]  United States District of Agriculture controls the...
[01:16:01.920 --> 01:16:05.920]  that a promissory note?
[01:16:05.920 --> 01:16:11.920]  You... we talked about that before and you gave me a link and I went to it and I couldn't find anything about.
[01:16:11.920 --> 01:16:12.920]  Okay.
[01:16:12.920 --> 01:16:13.920]  Okay.
[01:16:13.920 --> 01:16:15.920]  And on that link...
[01:16:15.920 --> 01:16:21.920]  I'm going to go through this gentleman through the seminar and he has done it.
[01:16:21.920 --> 01:16:23.920]  He has proven it.
[01:16:23.920 --> 01:16:25.920]  And he says, this is why...
[01:16:25.920 --> 01:16:26.920]  This is why...
[01:16:26.920 --> 01:16:27.920]  This is why...
[01:16:27.920 --> 01:16:30.920]  This is where they hide it.
[01:16:30.920 --> 01:16:35.920]  Also, yeah, we...
[01:16:35.920 --> 01:16:37.920]  You may have given me the wrong link.
[01:16:37.920 --> 01:16:40.920]  Can you speak to the link to that side?
[01:16:40.920 --> 01:16:42.920]  And don't take any more assignment.
[01:16:42.920 --> 01:16:44.920]  I'll see you next week.
[01:16:44.920 --> 01:16:45.920]  Okay.
[01:16:45.920 --> 01:16:46.920]  Thank you.
[01:16:46.920 --> 01:16:51.920]  This is Randy Kelsen and Debbie Stevens and David Craig with the radio.
[01:16:51.920 --> 01:16:54.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[01:16:54.920 --> 01:16:59.920]  We'll go to Leon, Neil, Jerry, Tyler will come back.
[01:16:59.920 --> 01:17:07.920]  Capital Coin & Bullion is a family-owned business built on the promise to bring you affordable pricing on all coin and bullion products.
[01:17:07.920 --> 01:17:13.920]  In addition to coins and bullion, we now offer storeable freeze-dried foods produced by Augustin Farms,
[01:17:13.920 --> 01:17:20.920]  ammunition at 10% above wholesale prices, Berkey Water Products, gift certificates, and our Silver Pool,
[01:17:20.920 --> 01:17:24.920]  a new way to guarantee silver by prepaying at a locked price.
[01:17:24.920 --> 01:17:27.920]  We can even help you set up a metals IRA account.
[01:17:27.920 --> 01:17:31.920]  Call us at 512-646-644-0 for more details.
[01:17:31.920 --> 01:17:36.920]  As always, we buy, sell, and trade precious metals, give appraisals,
[01:17:36.920 --> 01:17:39.920]  and cater to those with all sizes of coin collections.
[01:17:39.920 --> 01:17:42.920]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A,
[01:17:42.920 --> 01:17:47.920]  about a half a mile north of Canig next to the Ikiban Sushi and Genie Car Wash.
[01:17:47.920 --> 01:17:50.920]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[01:17:50.920 --> 01:17:56.920]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-644-0
[01:17:56.920 --> 01:18:00.920]  and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[01:18:00.920 --> 01:18:02.920]  What's been the problem with phone companies?
[01:18:02.920 --> 01:18:08.920]  High prices and contracts that locked you in for two years minimum, not FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:08.920 --> 01:18:14.920]  FreedomTelephones are designed around the concept and reality of patriotism, loyalty, and privacy.
[01:18:14.920 --> 01:18:21.920]  With FreedomTelephones.com, there are no contracts, no credit checks, and no social security numbers required.
[01:18:21.920 --> 01:18:24.920]  That's why our name is FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:24.920 --> 01:18:28.920]  Finally, residential, mobile, and business telephones and plans that are private
[01:18:28.920 --> 01:18:31.920]  and never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:31.920 --> 01:18:32.920]  Want a low price?
[01:18:32.920 --> 01:18:38.920]  Residential and business plans started only $14.99, and mobile plans started just $39.99.
[01:18:38.920 --> 01:18:43.920]  Plus, every month you pay your bill, FreedomTelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs.
[01:18:43.920 --> 01:18:44.920]  Don't wait.
[01:18:44.920 --> 01:18:52.920]  Support the cause and get the highest quality and the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553.
[01:18:52.920 --> 01:18:55.920]  That's 800-600-5553.
[01:18:55.920 --> 01:18:57.920]  FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:57.920 --> 01:19:00.920]  Portable, private, perfect.
[01:19:00.920 --> 01:19:27.920]  Oh, come on.
[01:19:27.920 --> 01:19:32.920]  Okay, we're back. Randy Kelton, David Stewart, David Craig here with our radio.
[01:19:32.920 --> 01:19:37.920]  And we're going to Stefan in Idaho.
[01:19:37.920 --> 01:19:43.920]  Stefan, I understand you have a question about grand juries.
[01:19:43.920 --> 01:19:44.920]  Yes.
[01:19:44.920 --> 01:19:46.920]  Can you hear me now?
[01:19:46.920 --> 01:19:47.920]  Yes, I can.
[01:19:47.920 --> 01:19:48.920]  Great.
[01:19:48.920 --> 01:19:49.920]  Okay.
[01:19:49.920 --> 01:19:53.920]  Seems to be...
[01:19:53.920 --> 01:19:54.920]  Well, that...
[01:19:54.920 --> 01:19:57.920]  That didn't last long.
[01:19:57.920 --> 01:20:00.920]  Well, at least Stefan, you got two words in.
[01:20:00.920 --> 01:20:08.920]  You know, I generally say I can't get two words in edgewise, but you got two words in straight up before we lost you.
[01:20:08.920 --> 01:20:09.920]  Let's give just a second.
[01:20:09.920 --> 01:20:12.920]  See if he recovers.
[01:20:12.920 --> 01:20:14.920]  Stefan, are you there?
[01:20:14.920 --> 01:20:16.920]  Yes, I'm still here.
[01:20:16.920 --> 01:20:17.920]  Okay, go ahead.
[01:20:17.920 --> 01:20:19.920]  We lost you for a minute there.
[01:20:19.920 --> 01:20:26.920]  Okay, I'm getting a run around about how to convene a grand jury or when they meet.
[01:20:26.920 --> 01:20:31.920]  I've contacted the county court and they tell me to...
[01:20:31.920 --> 01:20:33.920]  They refer me to lawyers.
[01:20:33.920 --> 01:20:36.920]  The lawyers refer me to the local police.
[01:20:36.920 --> 01:20:38.920]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[01:20:38.920 --> 01:20:39.920]  This is...
[01:20:39.920 --> 01:20:43.920]  It's not the county court that will convene a grand jury.
[01:20:43.920 --> 01:20:46.920]  It will be a district court.
[01:20:46.920 --> 01:20:47.920]  Okay.
[01:20:47.920 --> 01:21:00.920]  And not familiar with how Idaho does their grand juries, but normally a district court will convene the grand jury.
[01:21:00.920 --> 01:21:09.920]  And then the district court's coordinator will be the one that will essentially keep the calendar for the grand jury.
[01:21:09.920 --> 01:21:10.920]  Okay.
[01:21:10.920 --> 01:21:26.920]  So you go to the district clerk and ask the district clerk what district judge convened the most current grand jury.
[01:21:26.920 --> 01:21:28.920]  And that's all you want to know from her.
[01:21:28.920 --> 01:21:36.920]  Once you know what district judge convened the grand jury, then you ask her that judge's office.
[01:21:36.920 --> 01:21:44.920]  And when you get the office, ask for the judge's coordinator or clerk or whoever keeps the calendar for the judge.
[01:21:44.920 --> 01:21:50.920]  I don't think you're a lawyer because generally only the lawyers know about that.
[01:21:50.920 --> 01:21:57.920]  And so it's generally pretty easy to get to the judge's clerk.
[01:21:57.920 --> 01:22:05.920]  And once you get the judge's clerk, you ask the clerk, when does the grand jury's next schedule to meet?
[01:22:05.920 --> 01:22:13.920]  And they will generally answer that thinking you're an attorney and you probably have a client that's going to be up for indictment.
[01:22:13.920 --> 01:22:15.920]  So you want to be there at that time.
[01:22:15.920 --> 01:22:19.920]  It will assume you have a good reason for asking the question.
[01:22:19.920 --> 01:22:20.920]  Okay.
[01:22:20.920 --> 01:22:26.920]  I've never had a problem with getting, finding out when the grand jury meets this way.
[01:22:26.920 --> 01:22:38.920]  Never ask the prosecutor or the clerk when the grand jury meets because they're not going to want you to know anything about it,
[01:22:38.920 --> 01:22:41.920]  but primarily the prosecutor attorney.
[01:22:41.920 --> 01:22:46.920]  So if you do it this way, you can most likely find it pretty easy.
[01:22:46.920 --> 01:22:47.920]  Yeah.
[01:22:47.920 --> 01:22:53.920]  I seem to be getting a run around, a total run around like they're acting like they don't even know what I'm talking about.
[01:22:53.920 --> 01:22:57.920]  Exactly. That's standard.
[01:22:57.920 --> 01:23:11.920]  So that's why you just get someone, if they know you, then get someone else to ask the clerk when the grand, when, what, what judge convene the grand jury?
[01:23:11.920 --> 01:23:21.920]  Generally, when you start talking about district judges and asking questions about district judges, everybody gets concerned.
[01:23:21.920 --> 01:23:31.920]  Because the district judge is way above them and they don't want you going to the district judge.
[01:23:31.920 --> 01:23:43.920]  And if that doesn't work, then you might try going down and finding out what judge has motion hearings when.
[01:23:43.920 --> 01:23:52.920]  You can call down and ask, you know, how many district judges do you have in your jurisdiction?
[01:23:52.920 --> 01:23:54.920]  Is that a question?
[01:23:54.920 --> 01:23:56.920]  Yes, that's a question.
[01:23:56.920 --> 01:23:59.920]  Oh, I mean, for me, I have no idea.
[01:23:59.920 --> 01:24:20.920]  I can find out and call down and find out if you can find out who, if you have more than one, ask who the senior district judges and then call back and ask the district clerk when this judge is going to hold motion hearings.
[01:24:20.920 --> 01:24:21.920]  Yeah.
[01:24:21.920 --> 01:24:29.920]  And you ask that question and they're going to assume you're a lawyer, because that's kind of a question only a lawyer would ask.
[01:24:29.920 --> 01:24:30.920]  Right.
[01:24:30.920 --> 01:24:35.920]  And they'll tell you, it's only one day a week a judge will sit to hear motion hearings.
[01:24:35.920 --> 01:24:42.920]  And then you go down to the court at day and go up to the bailiff.
[01:24:42.920 --> 01:24:53.920]  And, you know, the bailiff, you know, I like to, I like it when the bailiff is on the judge's side of the bar because I walk up to the bar, always wear a suit and tie.
[01:24:53.920 --> 01:24:57.920]  I go to court without a suit and tie, wind up in jail.
[01:24:57.920 --> 01:25:01.920]  You go to court in a suit and tie, they think you're important.
[01:25:01.920 --> 01:25:05.920]  You point at the bailiff and say, you come here, I need you.
[01:25:05.920 --> 01:25:08.920]  They hate to be summoned.
[01:25:08.920 --> 01:25:14.920]  And when he comes over, he'll say, may I help you and suggest how we say, yes, I give him my name.
[01:25:14.920 --> 01:25:21.920]  And I tell the bailiff, instruct the judge that I have business with the court.
[01:25:21.920 --> 01:25:28.920]  And the judge is likely, the bailiff is likely to say, may I tell the judge to make you the business.
[01:25:28.920 --> 01:25:32.920]  And I didn't say, no, you may not have business with the court.
[01:25:32.920 --> 01:25:33.920]  And it's none of your issues.
[01:25:33.920 --> 01:25:35.920]  You just may start to go sit down.
[01:25:35.920 --> 01:25:40.920]  But you can do that however you want to. If you tell the judge you just want to know when the grand jury meets,
[01:25:40.920 --> 01:25:44.920]  the bailiff is going to give you a bunch of crap.
[01:25:44.920 --> 01:25:51.920]  So I would suggest that you tell the bailiff, I have business with the court and it's none of you as you're dismissed.
[01:25:51.920 --> 01:25:55.920]  Then turn and walk away from him and go sit down.
[01:25:55.920 --> 01:25:59.920]  He is not going to be a happy camper.
[01:25:59.920 --> 01:26:08.920]  And he's going to run up to the judge and tells the judge there's some jackass out here that says he has business with the court and he won't tell me what it is.
[01:26:08.920 --> 01:26:12.920]  And that's going to give the judge his attention.
[01:26:12.920 --> 01:26:15.920]  And it's going to pique his curiosity.
[01:26:15.920 --> 01:26:22.920]  And when he finishes with his motions, he's going to say, Mr. Stafford, I understand you have business with the court.
[01:26:22.920 --> 01:26:24.920]  And say, yes, your Honor, I do.
[01:26:24.920 --> 01:26:27.920]  And then you ask him whatever question you want.
[01:26:27.920 --> 01:26:38.920]  You will find that district judges tend to be far more professional and cautious than anyone else in the courthouse.
[01:26:38.920 --> 01:26:41.920]  They're the top of the pecking order.
[01:26:41.920 --> 01:26:46.920]  And they know that everybody below them wants their place.
[01:26:46.920 --> 01:26:54.920]  So they tend to conduct themselves with far more care and caution than those below him.
[01:26:54.920 --> 01:26:59.920]  I have seldom had problems with district judges.
[01:26:59.920 --> 01:27:09.920]  You ask the district judge, your Honor, when is the grand jury next scheduled to meet?
[01:27:09.920 --> 01:27:14.920]  And he will almost certainly tell you.
[01:27:14.920 --> 01:27:25.920]  Because he will be afraid that if he asks you any questions, you might actually tell him why you want to go to the grand jury.
[01:27:25.920 --> 01:27:29.920]  And he's not going to want to hear that.
[01:27:29.920 --> 01:27:37.920]  Because that'll put him in a position as a magistrate, which he doesn't want to be in.
[01:27:37.920 --> 01:27:46.920]  So that's how I suggest if you have to go to that, if you can't get it just by calling in and asking for the judge's coordinator,
[01:27:46.920 --> 01:27:52.920]  then go down and talk to the district judge himself.
[01:27:52.920 --> 01:27:58.920]  And the way to do that is to bushwack him in his courtroom and his whole emotion hearings.
[01:27:58.920 --> 01:28:00.920]  That sounds great.
[01:28:00.920 --> 01:28:03.920]  It's fine. You'll find it's interesting.
[01:28:03.920 --> 01:28:10.920]  When you go for the big guys, everybody treats you different. They get a lot more careful.
[01:28:10.920 --> 01:28:13.920]  That's being the sovereign.
[01:28:13.920 --> 01:28:26.920]  And if I had someone call in once and said, Mr. Kelton, how do you establish your sovereignty?
[01:28:26.920 --> 01:28:35.920]  I told him I don't. I don't have to. I am the sovereign. I just act like one.
[01:28:35.920 --> 01:28:41.920]  And that's how you establish your sovereignty. You are the CEO. You're the sovereign.
[01:28:41.920 --> 01:28:46.920]  Everybody there works for you, including the district judge.
[01:28:46.920 --> 01:28:55.920]  So you should have no problem going to him and asking him reasonable questions.
[01:28:55.920 --> 01:29:03.920]  If you've been into municipal courts, municipal court judges are absolutely horrendous.
[01:29:03.920 --> 01:29:08.920]  Then that's because they're low-level Trump minions.
[01:29:08.920 --> 01:29:15.920]  The guys who make it up to the district judge position tend to be a lot more experienced,
[01:29:15.920 --> 01:29:22.920]  a lot more knowledgeable, and a lot more aware of how precarious their political position is.
[01:29:22.920 --> 01:29:26.920]  So they are much, much easier to deal with.
[01:29:26.920 --> 01:29:33.920]  Then I would suggest that you be very cautious and don't go in with an attitude with the judge.
[01:29:33.920 --> 01:29:37.920]  And he most likely won't have one with you.
[01:29:37.920 --> 01:29:41.920]  And you'll find it a pleasant and professional experience.
[01:29:41.920 --> 01:29:46.920]  This was Randy Kelton Davis, David Craig on the Wheel of the Radio.
[01:29:46.920 --> 01:29:54.920]  I'll call it number 512-646-1984. And hang on, Stefan, because we'll be right back.
[01:29:59.920 --> 01:30:06.920]  A noble lie. Oklahoma City, 1995, will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[01:30:06.920 --> 01:30:10.920]  Based on the damage patting to the building, but the government says it's impossible.
[01:30:10.920 --> 01:30:13.920]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:30:13.920 --> 01:30:17.920]  The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[01:30:17.920 --> 01:30:22.920]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:22.920 --> 01:30:26.920]  The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[01:30:26.920 --> 01:30:30.920]  Expose the cover up now at anobleye.com.
[01:30:30.920 --> 01:30:38.920]  HempUSA.org has a revolutionary wonder food for detoxing the body and rebuilding the immune system.
[01:30:38.920 --> 01:30:46.920]  Micro-plant powder can help unclog arteries and soften heart valves while removing heavy metals, virus, fungus, bacteria, and parasites.
[01:30:46.920 --> 01:30:50.920]  Plus, it cleans and purifies the blood, lungs, stomach, and colon.
[01:30:50.920 --> 01:30:53.920]  Keep your body clean with micro-plant powder.
[01:30:53.920 --> 01:31:00.920]  Visit us at hempUSA.org or call 908-6912608 today.
[01:31:02.920 --> 01:31:03.920]  More energy.
[01:31:03.920 --> 01:31:08.920]  Stronger immune power. Improved sense of well-being.
[01:31:08.920 --> 01:31:12.920]  How many supplements have you heard boast of these benefits?
[01:31:12.920 --> 01:31:17.920]  The team behind Centrition believes that supplements should over-deliver on their promises.
[01:31:17.920 --> 01:31:21.920]  And Centrition does just that.
[01:31:21.920 --> 01:31:25.920]  Centrition utilizes the ancient healing wisdom of Chinese medicine.
[01:31:25.920 --> 01:31:28.920]  In conjunction with the science of modern nutrition,
[01:31:28.920 --> 01:31:38.920]  adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component, and organic hemp protein in greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base.
[01:31:38.920 --> 01:31:42.920]  Plus, Centrition tastes great in just water.
[01:31:42.920 --> 01:31:48.920]  This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product, and it's all natural.
[01:31:48.920 --> 01:31:56.920]  Visit Centrition.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436.
[01:31:56.920 --> 01:32:00.920]  After you use Centrition, you'll believe in supplements again.
[01:32:00.920 --> 01:32:28.920]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:32:28.920 --> 01:32:32.920]  Okay, we are still talking with Steven in Idaho.
[01:32:32.920 --> 01:32:36.920]  Seems like it's just more to run down here.
[01:32:36.920 --> 01:32:39.920]  Alright, Steven, go ahead.
[01:32:39.920 --> 01:32:44.920]  Is withholding evidence a due process violation?
[01:32:44.920 --> 01:32:47.920]  Whitholding evidence is.
[01:32:47.920 --> 01:32:49.920]  Yeah, for...
[01:32:49.920 --> 01:32:52.920]  Absolutely.
[01:32:52.920 --> 01:32:53.920]  Good.
[01:32:53.920 --> 01:32:57.920]  Okay, who is withholding evidence? Is it a prosecutor?
[01:32:57.920 --> 01:33:03.920]  No, the opposing, the claimant, the people who are...
[01:33:03.920 --> 01:33:06.920]  Okay, is this a criminal case?
[01:33:06.920 --> 01:33:08.920]  Yes.
[01:33:08.920 --> 01:33:10.920]  Ooh.
[01:33:10.920 --> 01:33:17.920]  Wait a minute, wait a minute. Claimant, the only claimant can be the prosecutor.
[01:33:17.920 --> 01:33:24.920]  Or is this the complainant?
[01:33:24.920 --> 01:33:30.920]  Stephen, did we lose you?
[01:33:30.920 --> 01:33:36.920]  Or did you lose me?
[01:33:36.920 --> 01:33:40.920]  My good human, I think I'm lost.
[01:33:40.920 --> 01:33:42.920]  Eddie, am I still here?
[01:33:42.920 --> 01:33:43.920]  Yeah, you're still here.
[01:33:43.920 --> 01:33:44.920]  Oh, okay.
[01:33:44.920 --> 01:33:45.920]  Okay, we lost Steven.
[01:33:45.920 --> 01:33:46.920]  Okay, we lost Stephen.
[01:33:46.920 --> 01:33:50.920]  Okay, yeah, and I didn't mean to be picking him apart on terms,
[01:33:50.920 --> 01:33:55.920]  but I think we were kind of missing meanings of things.
[01:33:55.920 --> 01:34:03.920]  Claimant, the only claimant in a criminal case is going to be the prosecutor.
[01:34:03.920 --> 01:34:09.920]  Now there is a complainant, and I suspect that's where it was.
[01:34:09.920 --> 01:34:12.920]  Okay, we have lost him altogether.
[01:34:12.920 --> 01:34:17.920]  Now we're going to go to Leon in Nevada.
[01:34:17.920 --> 01:34:19.920]  Leon.
[01:34:19.920 --> 01:34:22.920]  We have for us today.
[01:34:22.920 --> 01:34:24.920]  Yeah, good evening.
[01:34:24.920 --> 01:34:25.920]  Good evening.
[01:34:25.920 --> 01:34:26.920]  Can you hear me?
[01:34:26.920 --> 01:34:27.920]  Oh, okay.
[01:34:27.920 --> 01:34:28.920]  No, I can't hear.
[01:34:28.920 --> 01:34:29.920]  Word, you're safe.
[01:34:29.920 --> 01:34:30.920]  You're right.
[01:34:30.920 --> 01:34:32.920]  First off, I always want to say that.
[01:34:32.920 --> 01:34:37.920]  I'm having one of the only websites that will pull up on my old graphite computer.
[01:34:37.920 --> 01:34:42.920]  It's kind of nice because I'm on 10% of the websites I go to on this whole thing come up.
[01:34:42.920 --> 01:34:48.920]  Anyway, I just was curious, you know, and obviously not nearly as technical a question
[01:34:48.920 --> 01:34:53.920]  as the last several callers that you've had, but on religious grounds,
[01:34:53.920 --> 01:34:58.920]  I've chose not to have my children registered with Social Security Administration.
[01:34:58.920 --> 01:35:01.920]  And my son has been trying to get a job lately.
[01:35:01.920 --> 01:35:05.920]  You know, he's a teenager and wanting to get out there and do his thing.
[01:35:05.920 --> 01:35:09.920]  And everybody's requiring a Social Security number.
[01:35:09.920 --> 01:35:13.920]  And I'm wondering, you know, here in the state of Nevada, in our state constitution,
[01:35:13.920 --> 01:35:17.920]  it actually says we have an unmolested right of religious freedom.
[01:35:17.920 --> 01:35:22.920]  And so I'm wondering, do I have any kind of legal recourse on this?
[01:35:22.920 --> 01:35:24.920]  Eddie, you want to take that?
[01:35:24.920 --> 01:35:30.920]  Well, the Social Security number is not mandatory, is not, nor has it ever been mandatory.
[01:35:30.920 --> 01:35:31.920]  Right.
[01:35:31.920 --> 01:35:38.920]  Yeah, but every employer that he goes to, including, you know, people that I know that have a business
[01:35:38.920 --> 01:35:44.920]  have told me that their accountant will not employ him without a Social Security number.
[01:35:44.920 --> 01:35:48.920]  Well, that part's true enough, though there is law here in Texas,
[01:35:48.920 --> 01:35:54.920]  EEOC versus Information Systems Consulting, that says it's illegal for them to deny you employment
[01:35:54.920 --> 01:35:57.920]  because of the lack of a Social Security number.
[01:35:57.920 --> 01:35:58.920]  Right.
[01:35:58.920 --> 01:36:06.920]  However, that is the only case that EEOC has ever done on behalf of a private individual.
[01:36:06.920 --> 01:36:07.920]  Right.
[01:36:07.920 --> 01:36:12.920]  I mean, for instance, I couldn't sue, you know, friends of mine that have a business
[01:36:12.920 --> 01:36:17.920]  that claim they can't employ him because of their accountant.
[01:36:17.920 --> 01:36:20.920]  Sure you can, but you don't want to.
[01:36:20.920 --> 01:36:21.920]  Exactly.
[01:36:21.920 --> 01:36:22.920]  Okay.
[01:36:22.920 --> 01:36:23.920]  Yeah.
[01:36:23.920 --> 01:36:29.920]  And the issue here is where the IRS has the general public buffalode as to what constitutes
[01:36:29.920 --> 01:36:32.920]  an employee and an employer.
[01:36:32.920 --> 01:36:37.920]  They all think they're employers and that everyone they hire is an employee.
[01:36:37.920 --> 01:36:41.920]  That's not the case.
[01:36:41.920 --> 01:36:48.920]  They take what they think is good legal advice from accountants and so on and so forth, not
[01:36:48.920 --> 01:36:54.920]  realizing that they have the choice of telling the IRS take a fly and leap.
[01:36:54.920 --> 01:37:00.920]  Maybe you give me an idea that maybe the recourse of action I have or the best chance that I have
[01:37:00.920 --> 01:37:05.920]  is to take, you know, lawsuits that have been published on the subject and present them to
[01:37:05.920 --> 01:37:07.920]  people and just say, look, this is the law.
[01:37:07.920 --> 01:37:12.920]  And, you know, if you don't, you know, adhere to the law, obviously I have an issue against
[01:37:12.920 --> 01:37:19.920]  because I personally think it's, you know, it's a form of discrimination.
[01:37:19.920 --> 01:37:20.920]  Well, it is.
[01:37:20.920 --> 01:37:27.920]  They're discriminating against you versus foreign individuals that are required to have it.
[01:37:27.920 --> 01:37:30.920]  An American citizen has never been required to have a social.
[01:37:30.920 --> 01:37:32.920]  It's completely voluntary.
[01:37:32.920 --> 01:37:38.920]  But this seems to go to religious persecution.
[01:37:38.920 --> 01:37:45.920]  If you're going to get any traction, that's probably where you'll get it.
[01:37:45.920 --> 01:37:46.920]  Yeah, I'm.
[01:37:46.920 --> 01:37:49.920]  There's a lot of law on that issue.
[01:37:49.920 --> 01:37:57.920]  And if you're taking this position because of a religious conviction, then if you're persecuted
[01:37:57.920 --> 01:38:04.920]  because of this, then you can go to the, those of Robert Fox would know this real well because
[01:38:04.920 --> 01:38:06.920]  he deals with this a lot.
[01:38:06.920 --> 01:38:08.920]  This is a form of religious persecution.
[01:38:08.920 --> 01:38:14.920]  And I would think in Nevada that would be a pretty sensitive subject.
[01:38:14.920 --> 01:38:18.920]  And I agree, especially considering in the state constitution, it's very adamant about
[01:38:18.920 --> 01:38:20.920]  religious freedom.
[01:38:20.920 --> 01:38:24.920]  You know, it's very specific.
[01:38:24.920 --> 01:38:30.920]  But the problem is, is these are your convictions?
[01:38:30.920 --> 01:38:34.920]  Are these your son's convictions?
[01:38:34.920 --> 01:38:36.920]  And yes, he actually does agree.
[01:38:36.920 --> 01:38:42.920]  He doesn't actually have to have to go do this, but he's considering himself in no, no position
[01:38:42.920 --> 01:38:45.920]  to do anything but that because he wants to be able to get a job.
[01:38:45.920 --> 01:38:52.920]  Okay, then if your son is in agreement, then by all means hammer these guys, you know, if
[01:38:52.920 --> 01:38:59.920]  your son forces an employer to hire him, you have to understand the employer is not going
[01:38:59.920 --> 01:39:00.920]  to be happy.
[01:39:00.920 --> 01:39:06.920]  They're not going to want to keep you, but he still may be able to overcome that.
[01:39:06.920 --> 01:39:14.920]  Or if you could convince the lawyer that this is acceptable, then you may not have a problem.
[01:39:14.920 --> 01:39:21.920]  But I'd suggest that you try to do this in a way that's not confrontational with the
[01:39:21.920 --> 01:39:25.920]  employer or not more confrontational than it has to be.
[01:39:25.920 --> 01:39:26.920]  Right.
[01:39:26.920 --> 01:39:30.920]  And that's why I called you guys because I was really, you know, kind of trying to figure
[01:39:30.920 --> 01:39:32.920]  out my next step on this.
[01:39:32.920 --> 01:39:39.920]  Yeah, what you might want to be able to do is give the employer plausible deniability
[01:39:39.920 --> 01:39:42.920]  and go to them and say, look, you know, use the law.
[01:39:42.920 --> 01:39:49.920]  And, you know, I'm not in any way interested in taking action against you for not hiring
[01:39:49.920 --> 01:39:53.920]  my son, but you can.
[01:39:53.920 --> 01:40:00.920]  And you're refusing to hire my son for this reason will put you in this kind of jeopardy.
[01:40:00.920 --> 01:40:08.920]  And I would suggest if you if you really interested in a particular position is give them a brief
[01:40:08.920 --> 01:40:11.920]  in support of their position.
[01:40:11.920 --> 01:40:12.920]  Right.
[01:40:12.920 --> 01:40:17.920]  So that if anyone would come to them, they could say here, here's why I did this.
[01:40:17.920 --> 01:40:21.920]  Now, only leave me alone.
[01:40:21.920 --> 01:40:22.920]  And that sounds really good.
[01:40:22.920 --> 01:40:28.920]  And in fact, my friends with the business are knowledgeable on some of this stuff and
[01:40:28.920 --> 01:40:35.920]  actually may work with me in potentially creating a precedent type of situation here in Nevada
[01:40:35.920 --> 01:40:38.920]  where that other people could follow.
[01:40:38.920 --> 01:40:43.920]  If you have some guys willing to do that, that would be great.
[01:40:43.920 --> 01:40:52.920]  And one of the things to look at is primarily the religious freedom issue.
[01:40:52.920 --> 01:40:56.920]  That is a big deal.
[01:40:56.920 --> 01:40:57.920]  OK.
[01:40:57.920 --> 01:41:02.920]  And, you know, then the employer is threatened with a lawsuit.
[01:41:02.920 --> 01:41:07.920]  And I will look into these and I'll give you guys a call back and see how things are going here in a few weeks.
[01:41:07.920 --> 01:41:08.920]  OK, good.
[01:41:08.920 --> 01:41:12.920]  But this is not one of the places where we want to get in a fight if we can avoid it.
[01:41:12.920 --> 01:41:19.920]  Because if your son is looking for work, black in the eye of your employer is not a good way to get a job.
[01:41:19.920 --> 01:41:21.920]  And I totally agree.
[01:41:21.920 --> 01:41:27.920]  And that's kind of why I was trying to look for a different way of doing this, you know, and because you're exactly right.
[01:41:27.920 --> 01:41:35.920]  Although he's very smart and he's a very hard worker, and I'm sure he would overcome any, you know, disagreement I have on that.
[01:41:35.920 --> 01:41:39.920]  However, I wouldn't want to have to initiate it in the first place.
[01:41:39.920 --> 01:41:40.920]  Exactly.
[01:41:40.920 --> 01:41:41.920]  OK.
[01:41:41.920 --> 01:41:42.920]  Have fun.
[01:41:42.920 --> 01:41:43.920]  Good luck.
[01:41:43.920 --> 01:41:46.920]  And keep us posted on how this works out.
[01:41:46.920 --> 01:41:47.920]  All right.
[01:41:47.920 --> 01:41:48.920]  Thank you so much.
[01:41:48.920 --> 01:41:49.920]  Bye.
[01:41:49.920 --> 01:41:50.920]  OK.
[01:41:50.920 --> 01:41:51.920]  Thank you, Leon.
[01:41:51.920 --> 01:41:56.920]  Now we're going to go to Neil in Texas.
[01:41:56.920 --> 01:41:58.920]  Hello, Randy.
[01:41:58.920 --> 01:41:59.920]  Hello, Neil.
[01:41:59.920 --> 01:42:01.920]  What do you have for us?
[01:42:01.920 --> 01:42:07.920]  Well, you told me to call in yesterday when I talked to you yesterday afternoon.
[01:42:07.920 --> 01:42:14.920]  Ah, you're the guy from the County Registrar's Office.
[01:42:14.920 --> 01:42:15.920]  Yeah.
[01:42:15.920 --> 01:42:29.920]  I didn't want to get in the middle of your little date on what happened down at the sunset commission, so I figured I could wait till today.
[01:42:29.920 --> 01:42:30.920]  Yes, good.
[01:42:30.920 --> 01:42:31.920]  OK.
[01:42:31.920 --> 01:42:41.920]  I ran into Neil at the County Registrar's Office here in Austin, and we were going through some records.
[01:42:41.920 --> 01:42:45.920]  I'm not happy with Austin's record keeping.
[01:42:45.920 --> 01:43:00.920]  Yeah, I'd rather do the books, but you wanted a little timeline on what had gone on with my mortgage.
[01:43:00.920 --> 01:43:03.920]  And I wrote it down.
[01:43:03.920 --> 01:43:09.920]  I don't have it with me, but it's easy enough to recite from memory.
[01:43:09.920 --> 01:43:33.920]  So, in January of 1998, I bought a house, and it was funded through Pacific American Mortgage, which is a subsidiary of mortgage portfolio services in Dallas.
[01:43:33.920 --> 01:43:35.920]  OK, hold on.
[01:43:35.920 --> 01:43:37.920]  We're about to go to break.
[01:43:37.920 --> 01:43:39.920]  We'll pick you up on the other side.
[01:43:39.920 --> 01:43:42.920]  This is Randy Kelton-Debski with Daddy Craig.
[01:43:42.920 --> 01:44:00.920]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[01:44:00.920 --> 01:44:14.920]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:44:14.920 --> 01:44:15.920]  Step by step.
[01:44:15.920 --> 01:44:18.920]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:44:18.920 --> 01:44:22.920]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:44:22.920 --> 01:44:27.920]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:44:27.920 --> 01:44:33.920]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:44:33.920 --> 01:44:42.920]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:44:42.920 --> 01:44:51.920]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:44:51.920 --> 01:45:01.920]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EASY.
[01:45:01.920 --> 01:45:04.920]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.920 --> 01:45:15.920]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.920 --> 01:45:19.920]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.920 --> 01:45:23.920]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.920 --> 01:45:28.920]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.920 --> 01:45:34.920]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.920 --> 01:45:43.920]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.920 --> 01:45:52.920]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.920 --> 01:46:14.920]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EASY.
[01:46:22.920 --> 01:46:32.920]  Okay, we're back. Randy Calderon speaking in front of the video.
[01:46:32.920 --> 01:46:36.920]  And we're talking to Neil in Texas.
[01:46:36.920 --> 01:46:42.920]  Neil, let's move through this quickly. We've got three more callers and only one segment.
[01:46:42.920 --> 01:46:54.920]  All right, so it was a variable rate mortgage. In fall of 03, I refinanced to get a fixed rate.
[01:46:54.920 --> 01:47:01.920]  By the time I had refinanced, Chase was the servicer.
[01:47:01.920 --> 01:47:14.920]  I got it refinanced through Emerald Capital Mortgage, and they later sold the note, and Chase stayed my servicer.
[01:47:14.920 --> 01:47:20.920]  They got their money from Chase because they said that was the best rate.
[01:47:20.920 --> 01:47:29.920]  Wait a minute. Is there an assignment? Who did you refinance with?
[01:47:29.920 --> 01:47:32.920]  I refinanced with Emerald Capital Mortgage.
[01:47:32.920 --> 01:47:42.920]  Okay, is there a in the record? Is there an assignment from Emerald Capital to Chase?
[01:47:42.920 --> 01:47:45.920]  Well, I didn't see one.
[01:47:45.920 --> 01:47:49.920]  Okay, if you didn't see one, that means there wasn't one in there.
[01:47:49.920 --> 01:47:54.920]  Then there's no evidence that Chase has any authority to collect the note.
[01:47:54.920 --> 01:48:06.920]  And if you are up to date on the mortgage, then I would suggest you look at going into the district court
[01:48:06.920 --> 01:48:14.920]  and petitioning for a quiet title as the deed of trust.
[01:48:14.920 --> 01:48:27.920]  And maintain that since Chase is collecting that Emerald Finance transferred the deed of trust to Chase
[01:48:27.920 --> 01:48:33.920]  and failed to file it in the court record and moved to strike the deed of trust
[01:48:33.920 --> 01:48:46.920]  and force them into a leave them with no deed of trust and then file a bulletproof lien against your property.
[01:48:46.920 --> 01:48:48.920]  Okay.
[01:48:48.920 --> 01:48:53.920]  Now, there's no way for them to come back, and if you're up to date on your mortgage,
[01:48:53.920 --> 01:49:05.920]  then sue to demand standing from Chase and whoever Chase claims to be giving the money to.
[01:49:05.920 --> 01:49:15.920]  Are there any notices of negotiation of the security instrument in the court record?
[01:49:15.920 --> 01:49:17.920]  I'm not sure what you mean.
[01:49:17.920 --> 01:49:24.920]  The only thing I found out that day were the original data trust in 1998
[01:49:24.920 --> 01:49:29.920]  and then the data trust from when it was refinanced.
[01:49:29.920 --> 01:49:30.920]  Okay.
[01:49:30.920 --> 01:49:35.920]  And no assignments, no appointment of substitute trustee?
[01:49:35.920 --> 01:49:47.920]  Well, if they're there, they're not showing up in the records as we're able to look through them.
[01:49:47.920 --> 01:49:54.920]  You need to file a, get someone, I'm going to do some research on how to put together a bulletproof lien,
[01:49:54.920 --> 01:49:58.920]  get a bulletproof lien filed against the property.
[01:49:58.920 --> 01:50:01.920]  You get that in there, then we start digging.
[01:50:01.920 --> 01:50:06.920]  If anybody tries to come up, then you get to say, well, I did my due diligence.
[01:50:06.920 --> 01:50:08.920]  I checked the court record.
[01:50:08.920 --> 01:50:10.920]  There was no lien.
[01:50:10.920 --> 01:50:21.920]  So I allowed this claim because I could file a lien, a first party lien.
[01:50:21.920 --> 01:50:24.920]  And now you're coming back and say you had a lien, but it didn't show up.
[01:50:24.920 --> 01:50:33.920]  If it was the, because of the record keeping of Travis County, then you sue the clerk for the amount of the lien.
[01:50:33.920 --> 01:50:39.920]  That'll get the clerk to fix the record.
[01:50:39.920 --> 01:50:41.920]  Neil, I need to move along.
[01:50:41.920 --> 01:50:43.920]  We've got four callers.
[01:50:43.920 --> 01:50:44.920]  Okay.
[01:50:44.920 --> 01:50:46.920]  Will you send me that information?
[01:50:46.920 --> 01:50:53.920]  This is something I'd like to do off the air and kind of construct a way to go after these guys.
[01:50:53.920 --> 01:50:54.920]  Thank you.
[01:50:54.920 --> 01:50:58.920]  I realize you waited a long time, but we're right at the end of the show.
[01:50:58.920 --> 01:51:02.920]  We've got three more callers and.
[01:51:02.920 --> 01:51:03.920]  Go ahead.
[01:51:03.920 --> 01:51:04.920]  I understand.
[01:51:04.920 --> 01:51:05.920]  I understand.
[01:51:05.920 --> 01:51:06.920]  That's fine.
[01:51:06.920 --> 01:51:07.920]  Okay.
[01:51:07.920 --> 01:51:08.920]  I'll email you.
[01:51:08.920 --> 01:51:09.920]  Thank you.
[01:51:09.920 --> 01:51:10.920]  Okay.
[01:51:10.920 --> 01:51:13.920]  Now we're going to go to Dan in Connecticut.
[01:51:13.920 --> 01:51:15.920]  Dan, what do you got for us?
[01:51:15.920 --> 01:51:28.920]  Well, considering the time of short, I'm going to employ my skills, the fast talking swamp Yankee to get you through not only what happened, but the complaint that was filed and what I will do about it.
[01:51:28.920 --> 01:51:32.920]  So if I may, here's what happened.
[01:51:32.920 --> 01:51:36.920]  I am actually a citizen in electorate in the town of Plainfield, Connecticut.
[01:51:36.920 --> 01:51:56.920]  A board of education member recently was informed by the superintendent of schools, namely her former subordinate and the board of education that she was off the board of education because she was deemed to be an employee because she received a one time compensation for her services in 2011.
[01:51:56.920 --> 01:52:06.920]  Now, an employer employee law being what it is, we can prove that she was not an employee because she was free from control and direction. She provided her own transportation.
[01:52:06.920 --> 01:52:09.920]  She provided tools that she used on the job.
[01:52:09.920 --> 01:52:10.920]  It is a matter of.
[01:52:10.920 --> 01:52:12.920]  She was a contractor.
[01:52:12.920 --> 01:52:13.920]  Exactly.
[01:52:13.920 --> 01:52:15.920]  So here's what happened.
[01:52:15.920 --> 01:52:26.920]  They use that because they were looking to get her off of the board of education and the chair of the board of ed and the superintendent informed her that she was off the board. There's no hearing.
[01:52:26.920 --> 01:52:31.920]  There's no determination and trial fact that she was an employee.
[01:52:31.920 --> 01:52:48.920]  So what we both of us did today is we filed a suit in Superior Court in Putnam on the nature of Quaranto and we were seeking a petition for rid of mandamus ordering that the board of ed recognize her as a standing member of the board of education.
[01:52:48.920 --> 01:52:55.920]  And we saw an injunction preventing the chair of the board of ed and the superintendent from obstructing her from performing her duties.
[01:52:55.920 --> 01:52:59.920]  Now, I will go through my case strategy as follows.
[01:52:59.920 --> 01:53:04.920]  The hearing for a temporary injunction is scheduled for May 14.
[01:53:04.920 --> 01:53:16.920]  Obviously, that will be served by Marshall on Monday and basically it will be served upon both the defendants, namely the superintendent and the chair of the board of ed.
[01:53:16.920 --> 01:53:24.920]  Now, we are suing both of them in their personal capacities because they exceeded their authorities as defined by Connecticut General Statutes.
[01:53:24.920 --> 01:53:27.920]  They exceeded their authority under the scope of law.
[01:53:27.920 --> 01:53:31.920]  We are not suing the town. We are actually suing them as individuals personally.
[01:53:31.920 --> 01:53:34.920]  Now, here is my case strategy as follows.
[01:53:34.920 --> 01:53:42.920]  The return date is May 1. The day of the complaint is April 13. They will be served on April 16.
[01:53:42.920 --> 01:53:53.920]  So if they don't appear or do anything to file an appearance on May 3, which is the last day, I will file a motion for default for failure to plead.
[01:53:53.920 --> 01:53:59.920]  On May 1, I will be serving my first set of requests for admissions.
[01:53:59.920 --> 01:54:09.920]  And if there is no material fact in dispute beyond the date of the hearing or the day after, which would be May 15, I will file a motion for summary judgment.
[01:54:09.920 --> 01:54:16.920]  On May 15, if there is something that is still in dispute, I will be filing a motion for summary judgment. I will mark it ready.
[01:54:16.920 --> 01:54:19.920]  And I will be serving it to opposing counsel.
[01:54:19.920 --> 01:54:33.920]  Now, after that point, if anything is still going on in terms of discovery issues that need to be resolved, basically we will be able to put forth a set of documents in affidavits,
[01:54:33.920 --> 01:54:38.920]  proving that they have exceeded their scope of authority, and of course we will file a motion for summary judgment.
[01:54:38.920 --> 01:54:49.920]  So in a quick capsule review, that's pretty much a quote-warrant-toe suit to be resolved in a month and a half approximately.
[01:54:49.920 --> 01:54:56.920]  Okay, what is the nature of quote-warrant-toe? Are you trying to remove these two individuals from office?
[01:54:56.920 --> 01:55:04.920]  In Connecticut, quote-warrant-toe, believe it or not, happens to do not only with somebody who has usurped an authority that has not afforded to them,
[01:55:04.920 --> 01:55:14.920]  but it also has to do with an authority that somebody has claimed that they have, that they have exercised, that they don't in fact have.
[01:55:14.920 --> 01:55:20.920]  So that goes to, like, official oppression or official misconduct in most states?
[01:55:20.920 --> 01:55:29.920]  Yes, an attorney who filed a quote-warrant-toe suit against the judge that refused to rule on fixed motion she filed.
[01:55:29.920 --> 01:55:32.920]  And she did that specifically.
[01:55:32.920 --> 01:55:37.920]  That sounds like a really interesting maneuver.
[01:55:37.920 --> 01:55:48.920]  Yes, it does. And considering the time you have, I wish I had more, but I'm trying to use my skills as a fast-talking Yankee to get you into a very quick fashion.
[01:55:48.920 --> 01:55:51.920]  Well, you're doing good as a fast-talking Yankee.
[01:55:51.920 --> 01:55:53.920]  Thank you.
[01:55:53.920 --> 01:55:59.920]  Okay. Thank you. And next time, call in earlier. We've got three minutes left.
[01:55:59.920 --> 01:56:04.920]  Thank you, Dan. We're going to go to Jay in California.
[01:56:04.920 --> 01:56:07.920]  Jay, what do you have for us?
[01:56:07.920 --> 01:56:16.920]  Hi, Randy. I called you about a year ago about my mother in a probate matter in New Jersey that was begun with a piece of stolen mail.
[01:56:16.920 --> 01:56:32.920]  Recently, as of Wednesday, I received an email from the ADA coordinator. He's giving me a list of qualifications to have in order to get accommodations to have access to the court.
[01:56:32.920 --> 01:56:48.920]  The court has become arbitrary. They no longer accept my factors as filing, which they once did, because now they want doctor's certification for every aspect of my disability, despite me giving them...
[01:56:48.920 --> 01:56:51.920]  You're the one with the service dogs.
[01:56:51.920 --> 01:57:05.920]  Yeah, yeah, exactly. And so I am literally being set out because I have a hearing on the 20th, but I found the tablet that I could talk to to write what I need written.
[01:57:05.920 --> 01:57:11.920]  And then I take that, email it to myself, and then post it to Word, and it comes out perfectly.
[01:57:11.920 --> 01:57:22.920]  So I found out how to overcome a little bit of the carpal tunnels, but now what I'm worried about is I'm running out of time because what I really need to do is to get into federal court.
[01:57:22.920 --> 01:57:31.920]  I need to remove this to federal court, but I'm looking for a form in order to get it removed to federal court here in California.
[01:57:31.920 --> 01:57:53.920]  It's a notice of removal. You have to file an action in the federal court. You must make a federal claim, and then you file a notice of removal, and all it is is just you're hereby noticed that this case has removed federal court.
[01:57:53.920 --> 01:58:02.920]  Some lawyers, when they file removals, put in a whole bunch of junk in there explaining why they removed it.
[01:58:02.920 --> 01:58:13.920]  But that is absolutely unnecessary. When you remove the case, it's none of the state court's business why you removed it. They don't have any say about it.
[01:58:13.920 --> 01:58:20.920]  You don't file a motion to remove it. It's just a notice. You remove it automatically.
[01:58:20.920 --> 01:58:25.920]  I am sorry, Jay. We are totally out of time.
[01:58:25.920 --> 01:58:34.920]  Thank you, everyone, for listening and thank all the colleagues for calling me at me and bringing your interesting issues.
[01:58:34.920 --> 01:58:41.920]  And, Jay, I'm sorry we didn't have no time for you. If you're called back Thursday, we'll try to get to this issue with more depth.
[01:58:41.920 --> 01:58:50.920]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stephens, Eddie Craig with the radio. Eddie and Deborah will be back Monday. We'll all be back Thursday.
[01:58:50.920 --> 01:58:58.920]  And then Friday, Eddie and I will be back with you. So please listen and call in, ask us questions.
[01:58:58.920 --> 01:59:13.920]  Thank you.
[01:59:29.920 --> 01:59:39.920]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:39.920 --> 01:59:50.920]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:50.920 --> 01:59:59.920]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.