ROL_2012-04-06_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:04.000]  Time out, go to your room.
[00:04.000 --> 00:09.000]  Parents know that isolating kids is harsh punishment, but what if the isolation never ends?
[00:09.000 --> 00:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with the tragic story of two inmates stuck in permanent solitary.
[00:15.000 --> 00:21.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:21.000 --> 00:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.000 --> 00:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.000 --> 00:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.000 --> 00:41.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:41.000 --> 00:56.000]  Start Over with StartPage.
[01:11.000 --> 01:33.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:33.000 --> 01:47.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with more.
[02:03.000 --> 02:13.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:13.000 --> 02:39.000]  Start Over with StartPage.
[02:39.000 --> 02:51.000]  Critics note that liquefying and transporting LNG takes a lot of energy in itself, which reduces the overall environmental benefit, though the fuel may still be better than traditional fuels like oil or coal.
[02:51.000 --> 02:55.000]  But in any case, fueling garbage trucks with garbage is a spiffy idea.
[02:55.000 --> 03:11.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:25.000 --> 03:41.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:41.000 --> 03:56.000]  I'm Dr. Richard Jeff.
[03:56.000 --> 04:12.000]  I'm Dr. Richard Jeff. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[04:12.000 --> 04:24.000]  I'm Dr. Richard Jeff. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[04:24.000 --> 04:44.000]  I'm Dr. Richard Jeff. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[04:44.000 --> 05:04.000]  I'm Dr. Richard Jeff. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[05:04.000 --> 05:24.000]  I'm Dr. Richard Jeff. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[05:24.000 --> 05:52.000]  I'm Dr. Richard Jeff. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[05:52.000 --> 05:56.000]  Okay. Well, I've got the statute almost memorized verbatim.
[05:56.000 --> 06:04.000]  And in the statute itself, it does not say willfully or intently. It just says simple possession.
[06:04.000 --> 06:14.000]  Well, look up in the, your Code of Criminal Procedure will define culpability.
[06:14.000 --> 06:22.000]  Okay. You'll probably find it under what makes you culpable for the commission of that crime. And that's probably going to be willful.
[06:22.000 --> 06:30.000]  Okay. And funnidiously. Okay. I want to find out how hard it is for him to remove those words or if he can.
[06:30.000 --> 06:36.000]  That's great. Well, I go to trial in three weeks. So I'll give you a call before I go to trial.
[06:36.000 --> 06:39.000]  Okay. Make sure they appoint you new counsel.
[06:39.000 --> 06:46.000]  Well, okay. That's a good question. Since I'm going to court so quickly, I'm up in three weeks.
[06:46.000 --> 06:50.000]  Do I show up in the courtroom and say I'd like counsel?
[06:50.000 --> 06:53.000]  No. File a motion for counsel.
[06:53.000 --> 06:55.000]  Do it ASAP.
[06:55.000 --> 06:56.000]  Yes.
[06:56.000 --> 06:57.000]  Got you.
[06:57.000 --> 07:02.000]  And put in a notice that you do not waive your right to counsel. You demand counsel.
[07:02.000 --> 07:05.000]  Okay. Notice so. Okay.
[07:05.000 --> 07:16.000]  Okay. And get in a demand for finding the fact and conclusions in law to the judge on his rulings denying your subject matter jurisdiction.
[07:16.000 --> 07:25.000]  Okay. There's a few more questions I have, but I'll just call you another time to let the other listeners, callers come in.
[07:25.000 --> 07:28.000]  Okay. How long, when did you have your trial?
[07:28.000 --> 07:33.000]  Well, I had my last trial. It's been two months ago. So they rescheduled.
[07:33.000 --> 07:36.000]  Okay. So it's been a little time yet.
[07:36.000 --> 07:41.000]  So maybe a little late for the finding the fact and conclusions in law, but get it in anyway.
[07:41.000 --> 07:44.000]  Okay. Okay. Got you.
[07:44.000 --> 07:47.000]  Okay. I will call you before my trial.
[07:47.000 --> 07:49.000]  Okay. Good luck.
[07:49.000 --> 07:51.000]  Thank you. Thanks guys. Bye.
[07:51.000 --> 07:52.000]  Bye bye.
[07:52.000 --> 08:00.000]  Okay. Now we're going to go to Eric in Washington.
[08:00.000 --> 08:04.000]  If I can get Eric unmuted. Hello. Hi Eric. Go ahead.
[08:04.000 --> 08:08.000]  No, wait. I think I got Eric. Okay. No, wait a minute. Hold on.
[08:08.000 --> 08:10.000]  You got Doug. I got Eric. Okay.
[08:10.000 --> 08:12.000]  Hello, Rand. Okay.
[08:12.000 --> 08:14.000]  Yeah. Go ahead, Eric.
[08:14.000 --> 08:17.000]  Thank you for what you're doing. I appreciate it.
[08:17.000 --> 08:34.000]  The question is in regard to trying to hold the police accountable for their misdeeds up here in Seattle and their bouts and some really horrific abuses in my view.
[08:34.000 --> 08:43.000]  People being maimed and killed for a little reason and they're not held accountable.
[08:43.000 --> 08:50.000]  The prosecutors refused to prosecute saying that they're essentially untouchable.
[08:50.000 --> 08:58.000]  But these abuses are so egregious that the thing should be done.
[08:58.000 --> 09:02.000]  Go after the prosecutors.
[09:02.000 --> 09:13.000]  Well, my understanding is that for a private citizen like me, the way to do that is to go to the grand jury.
[09:13.000 --> 09:31.000]  But at the same time, I've heard that really there's been some procedural changes or something has been changed that really a private citizen is disallowed from going to the grand jury.
[09:31.000 --> 09:41.000]  Okay. Listen, I've heard this crap before and every time I've heard it when I checked the codes, it was crap.
[09:41.000 --> 09:49.000]  This is what the prosecutor will tell you. This is what the police will tell you and the judges because they don't want you doing it.
[09:49.000 --> 09:57.000]  I had a district judge in here in Texas, highest level district judge in the state tell me I had to go to the police department.
[09:57.000 --> 10:03.000]  I said, no, not going to the police department. I'm going to you.
[10:03.000 --> 10:06.000]  So they will lie to you.
[10:06.000 --> 10:11.000]  They'll tell you anything that they think you'll buy.
[10:11.000 --> 10:14.000]  Read the code of criminal procedure.
[10:14.000 --> 10:18.000]  In there, there'll be a section on duties of grand jurors.
[10:18.000 --> 10:22.000]  And I can almost guarantee you what it's going to say.
[10:22.000 --> 10:34.000]  It'll be a variation of this shall be the primary duty to have the grand jury to examine into all criminal accusations that come to their knowledge by whatever means.
[10:34.000 --> 10:40.000]  That's the most common language across the country is slightly different in Texas.
[10:40.000 --> 10:44.000]  But it comes out the same way.
[10:44.000 --> 10:57.000]  So be the primary duty, the grand jury to examine into all criminal accusations that come by way of your own knowledge by way of the prosecuting attorney or any credible person.
[10:57.000 --> 11:01.000]  This is consistent across the country.
[11:01.000 --> 11:05.000]  So we don't care anyway.
[11:05.000 --> 11:20.000]  What you're going to do is go to the prosecutor and demand that he give it to the grand jury and when he doesn't, you accuse him of obstructing justice and file against him, either with your attorney general or a district judge.
[11:20.000 --> 11:34.000]  If your attorney general in Washington state has prosecutorial power, then you file against the district attorney for misbeisance and office failure to perform a duty.
[11:34.000 --> 11:37.000]  He's required to conform.
[11:37.000 --> 11:45.000]  And for the purpose of shielding the accused from prosecution, the attorney general is going to refuse to act.
[11:45.000 --> 11:55.000]  So you file against the attorney general and I'm suggesting highest judge you can find that would be Chief Justice of the Supreme.
[11:55.000 --> 12:01.000]  No reason not to send him criminal complaints against the attorney general.
[12:01.000 --> 12:12.000]  And when the Chief Justice of the Supreme refuses to act, then you start going back for the grand jury with criminal charges against the Chief Justice.
[12:12.000 --> 12:17.000]  The Chief Justice is not going to be happy.
[12:17.000 --> 12:24.000]  You can't say anything to you that would be tampering with the witness.
[12:24.000 --> 12:32.000]  But you can say something to these other people that's getting him this problem. Chief Justice is the biggest fish in the pool.
[12:32.000 --> 12:38.000]  Every other fish below him wants his position.
[12:38.000 --> 12:48.000]  So the Chief Justice will perceive what you're doing is giving cannon fodder to his political enemies.
[12:48.000 --> 12:59.000]  That's what will frighten him. And when he gets frightened of his political enemies, you do not want to be the local prosecutor.
[12:59.000 --> 13:07.000]  Because that's going to stir up some local politics. That's my suggestion.
[13:07.000 --> 13:20.000]  I guess I have a question. I believe Deborah and perhaps either Eddie has written something that's on the rule of law website that discusses grand juries.
[13:20.000 --> 13:31.000]  That would be on the Jewish Imprudence website. There's a link to it from rule of law. That's one of my other websites.
[13:31.000 --> 13:56.000]  Well, I guess I would ask, and this is an open-ended question, but where would I get this idea that somehow the function and what the grand jury is willing to be able to consider and change at the time?
[13:56.000 --> 14:04.000]  We probably had public officials lying about it. That would be my notion.
[14:04.000 --> 14:08.000]  Okay. So you would suggest that I read the rule of the criminal?
[14:08.000 --> 14:15.000]  Yeah. As a matter of fact, I don't multitask good, but I'm trying to look it up right now.
[14:15.000 --> 14:25.000]  Washington State Grand Jury. We'll see what we come up with in Washington State.
[14:25.000 --> 14:32.000]  Courts term, summoning grand juries.
[14:32.000 --> 14:50.000]  Okay. The real place to look is in the Code of Criminal Procedure. This will take a bit to read all of it, and while we're doing the show, I'll try to kind of go through this and see what I can find, and I will come back with a report before the show is over.
[14:50.000 --> 14:57.000]  Okay. Well, thank you very much. I need to do some reading.
[14:57.000 --> 15:07.000]  Yeah. Nothing makes up for knowing what the law is, because it is so much fun taking that law and cramming it right down their professional throats.
[15:07.000 --> 15:09.000]  I'd love to do it.
[15:09.000 --> 15:12.000]  Okay. Thank you very much, Eric.
[15:12.000 --> 15:13.000]  All right.
[15:13.000 --> 15:17.000]  Now we're going to go to Doug in Texas.
[15:17.000 --> 15:19.000]  Hello, Randy.
[15:19.000 --> 15:23.000]  Hello, Doug. What have you got for us today?
[15:23.000 --> 15:43.000]  I've got a baguette with the adhesive language where the cop goes over there and says, open up your MF window and this and that and the other, and I just want to tell you that I have a little experience with the adhesive language
[15:43.000 --> 15:55.000]  of all in Texas, and what that says is it's using language that is calculated to cause a breach of the peace.
[15:55.000 --> 15:58.000]  In other words, your mother would have said that.
[15:58.000 --> 16:04.000]  Yeah. I think it says it's calculated to cause a reaction.
[16:04.000 --> 16:06.000]  Cause or in sight.
[16:06.000 --> 16:08.000]  A breach of the peace.
[16:08.000 --> 16:10.000]  Right.
[16:10.000 --> 16:17.000]  All right. Well, I, when I was a youth, I guess, you know what youth is if you ever watched.
[16:17.000 --> 16:20.000]  Yeah. Two years.
[16:20.000 --> 16:29.000]  My cousin, Benny's, that's a basic legal background is watching that about six times.
[16:29.000 --> 16:38.000]  When I was a youth, I just discovered the glories of drinking beer and cleaning.
[16:38.000 --> 16:42.000]  Well, hang on, Doug. We'll drink some more beer on the other side of the break, man.
[16:42.000 --> 16:50.000]  All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. The calling number is 512-646-1984.
[16:50.000 --> 16:54.000]  Just give us a call. Get in line. We're running out of time on the show here.
[16:54.000 --> 17:00.000]  We got a little over an hour and 45 minutes. We'll be right back.
[17:00.000 --> 17:09.000]  One is a serial hypocrite who lobbied for Freddie Mac before the housing crisis and for the individual mandate before Obamacare.
[17:09.000 --> 17:17.000]  Another, a counterfeit conservative who opposes right to work, massively increased spending and funded Planned Parenthood.
[17:17.000 --> 17:25.000]  Finally, a flip flopper who's been on all sides, supported our failouts and provided the blueprint for Obamacare.
[17:25.000 --> 17:32.000]  Three men, one vision, more big governments, more mandates, less freedom.
[17:32.000 --> 17:42.000]  One man stands apart, ready to deliver real change, voting against every tax increase and every unbalanced budget every time.
[17:42.000 --> 17:48.000]  A real plan to cut a trillion dollars year one and to balance the budget in three.
[17:48.000 --> 17:57.000]  Pro-life, pro-right to work, guided by faith and principle. Ron Paul, the one who will restore America now.
[17:57.000 --> 18:00.000]  Hi, Ron Paul, and I approve this message.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meares Proven Method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:14.000]  Michael Meares has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:14.000 --> 18:20.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:20.000 --> 18:26.000]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls?
[18:26.000 --> 18:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[18:29.000 --> 18:33.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:33.000 --> 18:38.000]  The Michael Meares Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:50.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meares banner, or email MichaelMeares at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 19:01.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:07.000]  Well, don't let nothing get to you. Only the father can do it by you.
[19:07.000 --> 19:13.000]  So don't let bad-mine people hurt you until Satan get behind you.
[19:13.000 --> 19:18.000]  Know what I mean? My friend and I'll judge you then.
[19:18.000 --> 19:27.000]  Come and do those things that hurt me crazy. Telling me a problem then. Calling his name once again.
[19:27.000 --> 19:36.000]  Every day you know he will stay in. Telling me a problem then.
[19:36.000 --> 19:44.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio. And again, call in number 512-646-1984.
[19:44.000 --> 19:49.000]  Please give us a call while we're on the air and ready to go. Don't wait till the last minute.
[19:49.000 --> 19:53.000]  Alright, we're going to continue on and try to finish up with Doug in Texas.
[19:53.000 --> 19:57.000]  Alright Doug, you were saying something about having beer and drinking it where?
[19:57.000 --> 20:01.000]  Oh yeah, I was in Houston. I was going to the University of Houston.
[20:01.000 --> 20:08.000]  I just discovered the wonders of beer and I was with a friend and we got a couple sick packs.
[20:08.000 --> 20:15.000]  We weren't actually holding that drink. We were like 19 and you had to be 21.
[20:15.000 --> 20:26.000]  Anyway, this cop pulls us over. My friend's driving and we had like two sick packs on the floorboard.
[20:26.000 --> 20:31.000]  And he pulls over and back then they would say sir and this and that.
[20:31.000 --> 20:36.000]  You know, they actually knew that they were the servants instead of the masters.
[20:36.000 --> 20:45.000]  And I just, you know, opened my door which I probably didn't tase or shot for doing that today.
[20:45.000 --> 20:53.000]  And I just kicked our little two sick packs over into the bitch, you know, with weeds in it, whatever.
[20:53.000 --> 20:58.000]  And I thought, well, you know, if he comes over here, even if he finds us, so what?
[20:58.000 --> 21:04.000]  You found some, they're in the bitch, big deal. You going to try to pin that on me?
[21:04.000 --> 21:11.000]  And I walked around and, you know, I mean, this is what you killed today.
[21:11.000 --> 21:16.000]  I'm sure I would have been tased or shot and whatever.
[21:16.000 --> 21:21.000]  But I just walked around there and I said, why don't you just leave this guy alone
[21:21.000 --> 21:26.000]  and go earn an honest living, get a real job.
[21:26.000 --> 21:31.000]  And then I, for some reason, he's a little...
[21:31.000 --> 21:37.000]  Some reason he took exception to that, Doug? I can't imagine why.
[21:37.000 --> 21:43.000]  He's a little foul language. And he said, you're under arrest for a business language.
[21:43.000 --> 21:54.000]  And they took me to Spring Tech, just right outside of Houston, locked me up for the evening.
[21:54.000 --> 22:03.000]  And, you know, the next morning they came in and said, well, your friend came in here and paid your $50 fine
[22:03.000 --> 22:16.000]  and bailed you out. And I said, well, how did my friend pay a $50 fine when I've never been before a magistrate or a judge,
[22:16.000 --> 22:25.000]  never entered a plea? And he said, well, that's what we set your plan at and he paid it, so you're free to go.
[22:25.000 --> 22:35.000]  And I said, well, you know, first place, give me my pocket knife back. And they said, no, we can't do that.
[22:35.000 --> 22:43.000]  And I said, well, give me my $50 back. So we can't do that. It's already been sent in.
[22:43.000 --> 22:47.000]  It's taken us to Congress to get it back or something.
[22:47.000 --> 22:55.000]  And so I went consulted with an attorney that my father knew and everything.
[22:55.000 --> 23:05.000]  And he said, well, first place, they cannot charge you with abusive language because it is defined as language that's
[23:05.000 --> 23:16.000]  reasonably calculated to cause a breach of the peace because their peace officers, their duty is to maintain the peace.
[23:16.000 --> 23:24.000]  And anyway, I called the little JP back up and told him I'd like my $50 back and just met another.
[23:24.000 --> 23:32.000]  And he said, well, we can't do that. And we've already sent it into the state and just met another.
[23:32.000 --> 23:44.000]  But to make a long story short, I did get my money back and I got their apologies and I got my little pocket knife back.
[23:44.000 --> 23:46.000]  And you settled for all that?
[23:46.000 --> 23:48.000]  Do what?
[23:48.000 --> 23:54.000]  I said, you settled for that? Why wouldn't you should have went after them, Doug, one by one and taken them out?
[23:54.000 --> 24:06.000]  I wasn't litigious back then. As I get older, now that I'm in my waning days or whatever, I'm ready to get some blood.
[24:06.000 --> 24:10.000]  But back then, all I cared about was next party or whatever.
[24:10.000 --> 24:16.000]  Like I said, I was just a yeet.
[24:16.000 --> 24:22.000]  Yeah, well, welcome back, yeet.
[24:22.000 --> 24:24.000]  Anything else?
[24:24.000 --> 24:26.000]  Okay.
[24:26.000 --> 24:29.000]  All right. Thanks for calling in, Doug. Appreciate it.
[24:29.000 --> 24:31.000]  We'll go for blood next time.
[24:31.000 --> 24:36.000]  All right. Well, hopefully you can draw it without losing any of your own.
[24:36.000 --> 24:38.000]  Well, hopefully.
[24:38.000 --> 24:40.000]  All right. Good night, Doug.
[24:40.000 --> 24:42.000]  Yeah, right.
[24:42.000 --> 24:45.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Gary in Texas.
[24:45.000 --> 24:48.000]  Gary, what can we do for you?
[24:48.000 --> 24:50.000]  And we seem to have two of them.
[24:50.000 --> 24:52.000]  Yeah.
[24:52.000 --> 24:56.000]  All right. We got this one. All right. Other Gary, you're out there. I don't hear you. Hang on.
[24:56.000 --> 24:58.000]  All right. Go ahead.
[24:58.000 --> 25:00.000]  Is this me?
[25:00.000 --> 25:02.000]  That's you.
[25:02.000 --> 25:10.000]  You know, the old Beatles song about, so I quit the police department and got myself a steady job.
[25:10.000 --> 25:12.000]  It's one of the classic lines in there.
[25:12.000 --> 25:18.000]  Doug's story reminds me of Foster Brooks appearing on the Dean Martin show.
[25:18.000 --> 25:26.000]  Well, actually, I think the education I got from my cousin Benny was pretty damn good.
[25:26.000 --> 25:30.000]  At least it teaches you how to look at things differently and argue them accordingly.
[25:30.000 --> 25:32.000]  I agree. But that's not why I'm calling.
[25:32.000 --> 25:38.000]  I wanted to follow up on a conversation I had, I guess about three weeks ago with Randy.
[25:38.000 --> 25:46.000]  And it was regarding some of the stuff that I think it's Leslie who was a guest who's a mortgage guru.
[25:46.000 --> 25:48.000]  Yes.
[25:48.000 --> 25:50.000]  Leslie in Pennsylvania.
[25:50.000 --> 25:58.000]  I saw your email and I got 20 calls and then forgot to forward it to Leslie.
[25:58.000 --> 26:04.000]  Since you reminded me, I will send that to her when I get off this show or in the morning.
[26:04.000 --> 26:10.000]  You might want to send me another email so it kind of bumps up to the top.
[26:10.000 --> 26:16.000]  Man, you know, I was going to nail you on that and hear you de-dang me.
[26:16.000 --> 26:20.000]  Listen, I wanted to ask you a question.
[26:20.000 --> 26:30.000]  Just to capitalize, I paid the mortgage off in December and made two written requests by regular mail for the original note,
[26:30.000 --> 26:40.000]  promissory note and deed of trust, got no reply or the replies I got were non-responsive, I should say.
[26:40.000 --> 26:50.000]  I sent a certified request and they actually wrote down in writing that they do not return original documents.
[26:50.000 --> 26:54.000]  And so they want to play.
[26:54.000 --> 27:07.000]  And I'm thinking that under RESPA that I am entitled, as long as they hold the note, whether they hold it lawfully or unlawfully,
[27:07.000 --> 27:19.000]  as long as they hold the note under RESPA, I'm entitled to request a copy as the note is currently with all the launches.
[27:19.000 --> 27:27.000]  And I think under RESPA they have five days to acknowledge my request and they have 30 days to comply.
[27:27.000 --> 27:30.000]  Do you know if that's true or not, Randy?
[27:30.000 --> 27:32.000]  That is true.
[27:32.000 --> 27:44.000]  You can also request it under UCC 3-508 and they are required to make it available for inspection.
[27:44.000 --> 28:05.000]  And you might inquire as to any remit or trust that the note through a pool has been involved with and demand the name of the document custodian for the pool.
[28:05.000 --> 28:07.000]  So that's a break term.
[28:07.000 --> 28:09.000]  Document custodian?
[28:09.000 --> 28:23.000]  Yes, because under Ginny May's rules, the note and all the documents associated with the transaction must be forwarded to the document custodian.
[28:23.000 --> 28:30.000]  And the document custodian must verify to Ginny May that the note meets all the requirements of the pool.
[28:30.000 --> 28:39.000]  And then the document custodian must maintain possession of those documents until termination of the note, so we know where it's supposed to be.
[28:39.000 --> 28:57.000]  But here's why they don't want to produce it, because if they ask the document custodian for it and he runs a search on his database, he's likely to come up with several of them.
[28:57.000 --> 29:08.000]  And then they're not going to be happy. Since you paid off the note, Wells Fargo has already lost on your note because they had to pay all this money back.
[29:08.000 --> 29:12.000]  But they still committed fraud.
[29:12.000 --> 29:19.000]  So you want them to produce that note, because you could have four or five other entities out there holding it.
[29:19.000 --> 29:37.000]  Well, as I mentioned to you three weeks ago, a national talk show host, whose name is Joyce Riley, is being foreclosed on a mortgage that she paid off over three years ago.
[29:37.000 --> 30:00.000]  Yes. She's not the only one. This is not terribly uncommon. Okay, hold on. We'll be right back. We've got radio 512-646-1984. We'll be right back on the other side.
[30:00.000 --> 30:07.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:07.000 --> 30:15.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:15.000 --> 30:18.000]  And thousands of my fellow force responders are dying.
[30:18.000 --> 30:19.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:19.000 --> 30:20.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:20.000 --> 30:22.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[30:22.000 --> 30:23.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:23.000 --> 30:24.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:24.000 --> 30:27.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[30:27.000 --> 30:30.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:58.000 --> 31:05.000]  Attention, listeners. Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books, here with a special announcement.
[31:05.000 --> 31:15.000]  According to the Southern Poverty Law Center's new report titled The Year in Hate and Extremism, in the past three years, the number of patriot groups has grown by 755%.
[31:15.000 --> 31:17.000]  Once again, making the list, Brave New Books.
[31:17.000 --> 31:23.000]  Also, congratulations to Austin's own RuralLawRadio.com for joining the ranks of the SPLC's favorite patriots.
[31:23.000 --> 31:27.000]  And shout out to Debra Medina's weak Texans for making the list as well.
[31:27.000 --> 31:37.000]  In order to show our appreciation for helping keep the bookstore on the front lines of the Battle for Liberty, for the whole month of April, mention this ad, and we'll take 5% off everything in the store.
[31:37.000 --> 31:41.000]  That's right, you can get 5% off the latest in extremist materials.
[31:41.000 --> 31:50.000]  Get your Ron Paul Yard signed or church, one of the last copies of the Oklahoma City Bombing's final report, or Charlotte Izabee's Deliver Dumbing Down of America.
[31:50.000 --> 31:54.000]  So come on down and help further the rise of the patriot movement.
[31:54.000 --> 32:23.000]  The bookstore is located at 1904 Guadalupe Street. 5% discount excludes precious metal sales.
[32:23.000 --> 32:30.000]  Hi folks, we are back. This is RuralLawRadio calling number 512-646-1984.
[32:30.000 --> 32:34.000]  We now have three Gary's on the line.
[32:34.000 --> 32:42.000]  So we're going to pick back up with Mr. Lockty as the last Gary we were dealing with, and then we'll go from there.
[32:42.000 --> 32:44.000]  All right, Gary, go ahead.
[32:44.000 --> 33:06.000]  So just to kind of redefine and reframe this, myself and others who have paid off our mortgages may end up, since we, since the mortgage companies are not sending back the original promissory notes, data trust.
[33:06.000 --> 33:21.000]  Other people are ending up like Joyce Riley, where they paid off their mortgages. The lien's been released in county record, but the mortgage company comes back and files a suit for foreclosure.
[33:21.000 --> 33:49.000]  And I heard another, on another talk show, you know, Bob Chapman, who has the International Forecaster, he said that in Joyce Riley's case that he verified she's having to sue over 20 note holders, which means that her note has been transacted at least 20 times that they know of.
[33:49.000 --> 34:04.000]  And I'm just astonished at the extent of the fraud that these lenders have perpetuated, and they're not going to do it with me. I'm not going to let them.
[34:04.000 --> 34:28.000]  I want to go and get my note. My signature is the only signature on my promissory note. My signature is the only signature on the data trust. Therefore, I own those documents, and they are withholding my property from me, and I want to know how to get it back.
[34:28.000 --> 34:30.000]  What do you know?
[34:30.000 --> 34:45.000]  Sue them. That's great fun. You know, in this case, if you file suit against them, you can't lose. They have no counterclaim of any kind.
[34:45.000 --> 35:08.000]  You sue them, and the first time they respond to your suit, you bar grieve them for the response, you move for sanctions, when the judge gives you a garbage ruling, you judicial conduct complaint to judge, just you get the opportunity to make a total nuisance of yourself.
[35:08.000 --> 35:24.000]  And they need to think of us as nuisances, as people who can make their lives miserable, and put their positions in jeopardy. That's the only way we're going to get this fixed.
[35:24.000 --> 35:35.000]  And you might look at the documentation in your note, and if it looks a little bogus, you might look at filing some criminal charges.
[35:35.000 --> 35:42.000]  What do you mean? I forget. The documentation of my note, and if it looks a little bogus, I don't follow you on that.
[35:42.000 --> 36:04.000]  Okay. Pull the notices of assignment. They're the most egregious. Look at the notary. Look at who made the assignment. See who you appointed as the beneficiary and as the trustee.
[36:04.000 --> 36:15.000]  And look at the first assignment. Was it the beneficiary through the trustee who made the assignment?
[36:15.000 --> 36:29.000]  If it wasn't, then the assignment's bogus. If it was, then look at the signatures on the document and the notaries.
[36:29.000 --> 36:52.000]  According to Ginny May, the lender must have on file with Ginny May if he is an issuer of securities. He must have on file with Ginny May a signatory list that can be updated once a year.
[36:52.000 --> 37:10.000]  That's if everybody who's authorized to sign documents for them. And then look at the notary itself. What I'm finding on most of them is that the only entry on the jurorate by the hand of the notary is the signature.
[37:10.000 --> 37:24.000]  Now ask yourself, when have you ever taken a document to a notary where they either typed in or stamped in the date and their name?
[37:24.000 --> 37:26.000]  Never.
[37:26.000 --> 37:28.000]  Exactly.
[37:28.000 --> 37:29.000]  Never have.
[37:29.000 --> 37:50.000]  I just got a document today that I lived at. The document was signed on the 16th and it was notarized on the 18th or 17th and 19th. It was notarized two days after it was signed.
[37:50.000 --> 38:16.000]  The signature on the document, the date on the jurorate, the date on the certificate of service, and the printed name of the notary was all in the exact same hand with the exact same pen.
[38:16.000 --> 38:21.000]  The signature of the notary was dramatically different.
[38:21.000 --> 38:25.000]  Now what's that to tell you?
[38:25.000 --> 38:29.000]  Off and it tells me it's fraud.
[38:29.000 --> 38:36.000]  Yeah, that signature. You know, okay, I'm going to admit something that at the time I didn't realize was the wrong thing to do.
[38:36.000 --> 38:47.000]  I got a notary 30 years ago, 20 years ago. I had a friend to help get in the bond business and he needed a notary so he paid for me to get a notary stamp.
[38:47.000 --> 38:54.000]  And when he was there and he had all these documents he wanted me to sign and stamp, I said, wait a minute, these are blank.
[38:54.000 --> 38:56.000]  He said, I know this is the way everybody does it.
[38:56.000 --> 39:06.000]  He says that when we get a bond with somebody out we don't have to go through in the morning to try to get a notary. So I said, well, that's the way everybody does it. I did a bunch of them.
[39:06.000 --> 39:10.000]  Well, then I had a share step to try to kill me and they arrested me.
[39:10.000 --> 39:18.000]  And Jim came bail me out and I'm sitting in his office one day and I said, Jim, there's a problem with this bond.
[39:18.000 --> 39:31.000]  He said, what's that? Well, I notarized it. That's what they have been doing as a matter of course.
[39:31.000 --> 39:45.000]  And what I'm seeing on these documents tells me that with the advent of computer generated documents,
[39:45.000 --> 40:02.000]  they have taken the notary's signature or even the whole jurorate, captured it out, they take an undated jurorate and sign it.
[40:02.000 --> 40:14.000]  Then they do a scan of it and copy it out into a frame and they print it on the document.
[40:14.000 --> 40:20.000]  And then they either stamp in or write in the jurorates, the notary's name.
[40:20.000 --> 40:28.000]  And you'll find sometimes that the date is printed in.
[40:28.000 --> 40:31.000]  And that's the guys that are a little more upbeat.
[40:31.000 --> 40:40.000]  What they did was had the notary sign a blank piece of paper or a piece of paper with a line under it.
[40:40.000 --> 40:45.000]  And then they captured that out and just dropped it onto the jurorate.
[40:45.000 --> 40:53.000]  It's really easy to do. I could do that in about 30 seconds.
[40:53.000 --> 41:05.000]  So what I want to start doing is I look at the jurorate and the notary's name and the date of the document.
[41:05.000 --> 41:18.000]  And then I do a request from the notary for her copies of her log from a week before to a week after.
[41:18.000 --> 41:29.000]  And then I want to find the loan company and look at other loans they've done that are similar.
[41:29.000 --> 41:37.000]  Then I look through the court records and pull assignments and other similar documents from that loan company.
[41:37.000 --> 41:41.000]  And then I want to look at those notary signatures.
[41:41.000 --> 41:53.000]  And if I can take a notary signature off of a document in one record and then copy it out and superimpose it over a document in another record
[41:53.000 --> 41:59.000]  and they match, these guys got a problem.
[41:59.000 --> 42:02.000]  Well, you know, you just reminded me of something.
[42:02.000 --> 42:14.000]  Years ago I was a notary public judge and I recall that we were required, I don't know if we were required,
[42:14.000 --> 42:28.000]  an option to purchase errors in admissions insurance because if we notarized the document and we somehow missed a legal standard
[42:28.000 --> 42:35.000]  or made an error or made an omission of some sort that we could be sued personally for,
[42:35.000 --> 42:43.000]  our insurance company was there to back us up to, I think, a million dollars.
[42:43.000 --> 42:46.000]  That is such good news.
[42:46.000 --> 42:54.000]  And so I'm wondering if, I mean, you know, going after the mortgage companies,
[42:54.000 --> 43:00.000]  just as Goldman Sachs and Chase and JP Morgan, they own everything,
[43:00.000 --> 43:08.000]  I wonder if a better target for suit would be the insurance companies that sponsor the E&O coverage for the notary?
[43:08.000 --> 43:18.000]  A better target would be the notary himself for fraud and forging government documents.
[43:18.000 --> 43:24.000]  Of course, but that will incorporate, that will automatically bring in the E&O insurance companies.
[43:24.000 --> 43:33.000]  Yes, when you go after the notary personally, especially if you go after him criminally,
[43:33.000 --> 43:40.000]  what are you going to do? He's going to feed you at the bank.
[43:40.000 --> 43:44.000]  Okay, this is Randy Calton, Debbie Stephens, Eddie Craig.
[43:44.000 --> 43:47.000]  We have a lot of video. We're about to go to break.
[43:47.000 --> 43:51.000]  I call in number 5126461984.
[43:51.000 --> 43:53.000]  We're talking to Gary from Texas.
[43:53.000 --> 44:01.000]  We'll finish up on the other side and then go to Gary in Minnesota and another Gary in Texas.
[44:01.000 --> 44:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.000 --> 44:11.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course
[44:11.000 --> 44:15.000]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.000 --> 44:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:39.000 --> 44:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:50.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:50.000 --> 44:52.000]  prosay tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:06.000]  The Oklahoma City Bombing. Top 10 reasons to question the official story.
[45:06.000 --> 45:10.000]  Reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices.
[45:10.000 --> 45:15.000]  On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the right-of-truck
[45:15.000 --> 45:18.000]  report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators.
[45:18.000 --> 45:23.000]  FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone delivered the right-of-truck bomb
[45:23.000 --> 45:25.000]  to the Murrow Building and detonated it.
[45:25.000 --> 45:29.000]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning,
[45:29.000 --> 45:33.000]  Dana Bradley, who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing,
[45:33.000 --> 45:39.000]  testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fable John Doe number two, exiting the right-of-truck.
[45:39.000 --> 45:45.000]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing,
[45:45.000 --> 45:51.000]  no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing,
[45:51.000 --> 45:57.000]  including when he rented the right-of-truck, and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:57.000 --> 46:23.000]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:23.000 --> 46:47.000]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Room of Law Radio. This is our Friday night for our marathon,
[46:47.000 --> 46:50.000]  and we have just a little over an hour left to get her done.
[46:50.000 --> 46:57.000]  Right now we are still talking with Mr. Lochte in Texas. All right, Gary, go ahead.
[46:57.000 --> 47:03.000]  Listen, I've taken up time from the other college, and I know we can't try these people on the radio.
[47:03.000 --> 47:08.000]  We need to try them in the courts. I wanted to ask you a question.
[47:08.000 --> 47:12.000]  Do you know anything or can you update us on Robert Fox?
[47:12.000 --> 47:17.000]  Yes, I'm glad you said that. Robert is out of the hospital.
[47:17.000 --> 47:26.000]  I think all he needed was an enema because he had been full of it for years.
[47:26.000 --> 47:30.000]  Yeah, he called me. He's out. He's doing better.
[47:30.000 --> 47:36.000]  And I think they have him set to finish his trial the third week of April.
[47:36.000 --> 47:43.000]  I think the 21st of April, I believe, is what he said, 21st to 23rd.
[47:43.000 --> 47:58.000]  So I'm confident from the way the jury appeared, they kind of, the biggest help that Robert had was prosecution.
[47:58.000 --> 48:05.000]  Robert had the accusing officer who's instigated all of this stuff on the stand.
[48:05.000 --> 48:16.000]  And we're talking about the eight prosecutions that had already gone on, and he asked the officer, how many convictions have you gotten?
[48:16.000 --> 48:22.000]  And the officers smiled at him and said, none yet.
[48:22.000 --> 48:28.000]  And I thought if I was the prosecutor, I would shoot that man.
[48:28.000 --> 48:34.000]  I could not believe that moron did that in front of the jury.
[48:34.000 --> 48:41.000]  And then Robert finished with him and called his first witness.
[48:41.000 --> 48:52.000]  And he testified that the Jacksonville police had harassed her, and one officer had threatened her that if he ever saw her in Jacksonville again, he would arrest her.
[48:52.000 --> 48:59.000]  And for reasons I don't know, Robert didn't ask who that officer was.
[48:59.000 --> 49:09.000]  And for reasons I also don't know, when Beckworth, the district attorney, got her on cross, he asked her one question.
[49:09.000 --> 49:21.000]  Who was that officer that threatened you that when he said, Jason Price, you could have heard a pin drop?
[49:21.000 --> 49:24.000]  No more questions.
[49:24.000 --> 49:28.000]  I think that lost the case for them.
[49:28.000 --> 49:32.000]  Because it became clear that this is what Robert was saying.
[49:32.000 --> 49:34.000]  This was all harassment.
[49:34.000 --> 49:41.000]  And when the jury filed out after that, they all made eye contact with us, but one or two.
[49:41.000 --> 49:44.000]  Before that, they never made eye contact.
[49:44.000 --> 49:51.000]  So I think if his lawyer doesn't mess it up, the case is won.
[49:51.000 --> 49:55.000]  So he has a lawyer assisting him, the case?
[49:55.000 --> 50:03.000]  Yes, yes, and the lawyer knows who I am, and I have called right down his throat.
[50:03.000 --> 50:16.000]  When the lawyer took over for Robert, he was telling Robert that it was his decision, or rather he kept leading, he kept acting as lead counsel.
[50:16.000 --> 50:24.000]  That it wasn't our decision, and I spun on that lawyer, stuck my finger right in his face, you should have done this yesterday.
[50:24.000 --> 50:27.000]  You had a duty under the bar to do this yesterday.
[50:27.000 --> 50:32.000]  You knew better, and man, he turned bright red.
[50:32.000 --> 50:39.000]  That was about six foot six, so I guess he's not used to people getting in his face.
[50:39.000 --> 50:44.000]  And then he says, well, when you're through talking to your counsel, I'll be over here.
[50:44.000 --> 50:49.000]  And then when he came back, he had a whole different attitude.
[50:49.000 --> 50:59.000]  He knows who I am, he knows about my bar grievance site, and he knows I am looking for a reason to hammer him.
[50:59.000 --> 51:04.000]  So I think he's likely to try to do himself a good job here.
[51:04.000 --> 51:13.000]  He better, or I'll do my best to put him out of business with bar grievances for his failure.
[51:13.000 --> 51:18.000]  Now I won't do anything vindictive or anything inappropriate.
[51:18.000 --> 51:21.000]  I'll just follow the thunder.
[51:21.000 --> 51:29.000]  I'll look at what he does and walk down the American Bar Association model standards.
[51:29.000 --> 51:36.000]  And I get to do that because the guy is not on Robert's dime, he's on my dime.
[51:36.000 --> 51:41.000]  He's a court appointed counsel, so we're the one paying him.
[51:41.000 --> 51:49.000]  So anyway, that's the position I'm more confident that Robert's going to get all this behind him.
[51:49.000 --> 51:50.000]  Well, I hope so.
[51:50.000 --> 51:55.000]  And listen, thank you so much for what you all do for everybody.
[51:55.000 --> 52:01.000]  And I'll send you an email reminder, Randy, about getting Leslie in contact with me.
[52:01.000 --> 52:06.000]  But I really appreciate what y'all do, and y'all have helped me personally so much.
[52:06.000 --> 52:13.000]  I'm really thankful for you guys, so continue success and I'll listen to the rest of the show.
[52:13.000 --> 52:15.000]  Thank you, Gary.
[52:15.000 --> 52:17.000]  Okay.
[52:17.000 --> 52:24.000]  Now we're going to go to Barry in Minnesota if my screen stopped jumping around.
[52:24.000 --> 52:25.000]  Gotcha.
[52:25.000 --> 52:26.000]  Okay.
[52:26.000 --> 52:33.000]  Actually, Greg, actually, but I've been called worse.
[52:33.000 --> 52:34.000]  Okay.
[52:34.000 --> 52:35.000]  What do you got for us?
[52:35.000 --> 52:40.000]  Well, I called last Friday, but it was really late, so we didn't get to the meat of the situation.
[52:40.000 --> 52:50.000]  My brother has got the state of Minnesota after him for taxes and not driving returns, not the impact.
[52:50.000 --> 52:51.000]  Wait a minute, Gary.
[52:51.000 --> 52:54.000]  I'm having trouble understanding you.
[52:54.000 --> 52:55.000]  Okay.
[52:55.000 --> 52:58.000]  Are you on a speakerphone?
[52:58.000 --> 53:00.000]  No.
[53:00.000 --> 53:01.000]  Hmm.
[53:01.000 --> 53:04.000]  Do you have your head stuck inside a toilet?
[53:04.000 --> 53:05.000]  No, not right now.
[53:05.000 --> 53:06.000]  Not right now.
[53:06.000 --> 53:10.000]  Well, you get that kind of a muffled sound.
[53:10.000 --> 53:11.000]  Speak a little bit slowly.
[53:11.000 --> 53:14.000]  Maybe you'll understand a little better.
[53:14.000 --> 53:15.000]  All right.
[53:15.000 --> 53:26.000]  My brother is at the IRS coming after him, and they're already garnishing his wages in Minnesota here, the state.
[53:26.000 --> 53:28.000]  And the feds are now coming after him.
[53:28.000 --> 53:34.000]  And I'm wondering, how do you see the IRS?
[53:34.000 --> 53:35.000]  Okay.
[53:35.000 --> 53:44.000]  You know, has he failed to file, or has he filed and they don't like what he filed?
[53:44.000 --> 53:45.000]  No.
[53:45.000 --> 53:47.000]  What is the nature of his claim?
[53:47.000 --> 53:50.000]  He doesn't file, and he doesn't see any taxes.
[53:50.000 --> 53:52.000]  I can't get him to file.
[53:52.000 --> 53:54.000]  I can't get him to talk to people.
[53:54.000 --> 53:55.000]  Okay.
[53:55.000 --> 53:59.000]  Does he have his own business, or does he work for someone else?
[53:59.000 --> 54:03.000]  I'm independent contractor.
[54:03.000 --> 54:04.000]  He's a contractor.
[54:04.000 --> 54:05.000]  He's got his own business.
[54:05.000 --> 54:07.000]  He should file.
[54:07.000 --> 54:10.000]  If you have your own business, you almost never pay anything.
[54:10.000 --> 54:13.000]  I know, but he won't do it.
[54:13.000 --> 54:14.000]  Yeah.
[54:14.000 --> 54:16.000]  Well, he's likely to go to jail.
[54:16.000 --> 54:18.000]  You know, these guys cheat.
[54:18.000 --> 54:23.000]  Well, I know that's kind of what I was telling him, but he just won't do it.
[54:23.000 --> 54:28.000]  And I mean, it's a nice to stand well, but he does not like the IRS.
[54:28.000 --> 54:31.000]  He just won't deal with them.
[54:31.000 --> 54:38.000]  If you know anybody that does like the IRS, send them a Get Well card.
[54:38.000 --> 54:43.000]  How do you take these guys on?
[54:43.000 --> 54:49.000]  The problem is, you know, we have a lot of people that have all these strategies,
[54:49.000 --> 54:52.000]  but most of them wind up in jail.
[54:52.000 --> 54:53.000]  I know.
[54:53.000 --> 54:55.000]  That's what I've noticed.
[54:55.000 --> 54:56.000]  Yeah.
[54:56.000 --> 54:59.000]  So it doesn't matter that they're right.
[54:59.000 --> 55:02.000]  You know, Erwin Schiff was right.
[55:02.000 --> 55:05.000]  Oh, I didn't know if he was right or not.
[55:05.000 --> 55:07.000]  He just, you know, he ended up.
[55:07.000 --> 55:08.000]  Yeah.
[55:08.000 --> 55:09.000]  Yeah.
[55:09.000 --> 55:14.000]  And they're everyone I've seen that's really taking them on.
[55:14.000 --> 55:16.000]  They wind up in jail.
[55:16.000 --> 55:26.000]  So the way to fight this is file the tax, pay the tax, then go back after and fight them
[55:26.000 --> 55:27.000]  all you want to.
[55:27.000 --> 55:34.000]  And I've been suggesting that people file against these agents in the state courts.
[55:34.000 --> 55:37.000]  Look at your master file.
[55:37.000 --> 55:40.000]  Have your brother give his master file.
[55:40.000 --> 55:50.000]  And then have someone who knows how to analyze the master file to pull his employment code
[55:50.000 --> 55:53.000]  from the master file.
[55:53.000 --> 55:57.000]  He thinks he knows what he does for a living, but he's probably wrong.
[55:57.000 --> 55:59.000]  Yeah, I know it's back and forth there.
[55:59.000 --> 56:00.000]  Yeah.
[56:00.000 --> 56:06.000]  It's in there somewhere and it'll be a code that puts him in a profession that would make
[56:06.000 --> 56:07.000]  him taxable.
[56:07.000 --> 56:16.000]  Now what he wants to know is who put that in there and he wants that taken out and they'll
[56:16.000 --> 56:17.000]  refuse and all that.
[56:17.000 --> 56:23.000]  And then you go after the head of the department who would be responsible for those records.
[56:23.000 --> 56:27.000]  You file against the head of that department because there won't be a signature on any
[56:27.000 --> 56:29.000]  of these documents where that's done.
[56:29.000 --> 56:35.000]  You file against the head of the department as respond to get superior and you file against
[56:35.000 --> 56:38.000]  him with a local grand jury.
[56:38.000 --> 56:42.000]  Not a federal, but a local.
[56:42.000 --> 56:45.000]  That'll get him dancing.
[56:45.000 --> 56:47.000]  They're coming after him anyway.
[56:47.000 --> 56:52.000]  Now he's got something to negotiate with.
[56:52.000 --> 56:56.000]  You leave me alone, I'll leave him alone.
[56:56.000 --> 56:57.000]  Right.
[56:57.000 --> 57:01.000]  But otherwise your brother's going to wind up in jail.
[57:01.000 --> 57:02.000]  I know.
[57:02.000 --> 57:06.000]  So I was doing the research delay and I said, whether between a petty misdemeanor and a
[57:06.000 --> 57:12.000]  gross misdemeanor or possibly if we get to a felony issue, they keep adding one contact
[57:12.000 --> 57:13.000]  for another.
[57:13.000 --> 57:16.000]  And I think it's pretty serious.
[57:16.000 --> 57:27.000]  You need to go to walk to the Walgreens or to the drug store and get him a good toothbrush.
[57:27.000 --> 57:35.000]  If it were to say, Baba, you're going to need this.
[57:35.000 --> 57:38.000]  So let me ask you a question here.
[57:38.000 --> 57:43.000]  Now I know that you said something there that seems to be different when you're dealing
[57:43.000 --> 57:46.000]  with the IRS or with all the other debt collectors.
[57:46.000 --> 57:52.000]  In the IRS, you have to either pay them or set a payment arrangement first.
[57:52.000 --> 57:54.000]  Otherwise you can't really...
[57:54.000 --> 57:58.000]  Yeah, the IRS does not fall under the FTCPA.
[57:58.000 --> 58:01.000]  Okay, that would be different.
[58:01.000 --> 58:05.000]  They are not similarly bound.
[58:05.000 --> 58:08.000]  Okay, do you have anything else for us, Craig?
[58:08.000 --> 58:09.000]  Yeah, one quick question.
[58:09.000 --> 58:12.000]  The priority is the great and then I'll be done here.
[58:12.000 --> 58:14.000]  Okay, we'll pick you back up on the other side then.
[58:14.000 --> 58:17.000]  This is Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[58:17.000 --> 58:21.000]  It looks like we're going to the top of the hour.
[58:21.000 --> 58:24.000]  We'll be three, four minutes.
[58:24.000 --> 58:31.000]  We'll be patient with this and pay very, very close attention to our advertisers.
[58:31.000 --> 58:33.000]  They would appreciate that.
[58:33.000 --> 58:36.000]  This is Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[58:36.000 --> 58:37.000]  We have our radio.
[58:37.000 --> 58:38.000]  We've got one more hour.
[58:38.000 --> 58:43.000]  Our call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:43.000 --> 58:45.000]  Give us a call.
[58:45.000 --> 58:52.000]  We'll be right back.
[59:16.000 --> 59:19.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:19.000 --> 59:23.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:23.000 --> 59:28.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:28.000 --> 59:32.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:32.000 --> 59:38.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:38.000 --> 59:43.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:43.000 --> 59:54.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:54.000 --> 59:58.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:58.000 --> 01:00:02.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:02.000 --> 01:00:06.000]  I'm not a mind reader, but there's a good chance I can guess your password.
[01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:12.000]  Most people choose passwords from a limited repertoire, so hacking in is a piece of cake.
[01:00:12.000 --> 01:00:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with the solution.
[01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  It's hard to remember a complicated password, but that's no excuse for a pathetic one.
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:54.000]  Recent security breaches have exposed millions of passwords, so we know what people are choosing.
[01:00:54.000 --> 01:01:00.000]  The most common password is 123456, followed by 12345.
[01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:02.000]  I Love You is also in the top 10.
[01:01:02.000 --> 01:01:05.000]  If your password is too easy, beef it up.
[01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:09.000]  It takes just a few seconds to guess a password with seven lowercase letters,
[01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:13.000]  but add capital letters and numbers, and things get much harder.
[01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  Add some other character, like a dollar sign, and increase the length to 10 characters,
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:23.000]  and suddenly cracking your password is virtually impossible, and that's good security.
[01:01:23.000 --> 01:01:24.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:28.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:38.000]  In 1946, Felix Gulcha answered his doorbell and was shot in the chest and killed.
[01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  The case has finally been solved 65 years later with the confession of a 96-year-old woman.
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:46.000]  It's quite a story.
[01:01:46.000 --> 01:01:47.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:01:47.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  We'll return for more.
[01:02:17.000 --> 01:02:22.000]  Adi Visser was part of the resistance when the Nazis occupied Holland in World War II.
[01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:27.000]  She took a gun and doled out vigilante justice to a guy named Felix Gulcha,
[01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  a Dutch businessman and Nazi sympathizer who did business with the enemy.
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:36.000]  Trouble is, Gulcha was actually doing what Oscar Schindler did in the movie Schindler's List.
[01:02:36.000 --> 01:02:41.000]  While pretending to support the Nazis, he was actually sheltering Jews and helping them to safety.
[01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  Adi discovered her mistake after the murder and carried the tragic secret 65 years.
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:51.000]  Her conscience finally got the better of her, and at age 96 she confessed.
[01:02:51.000 --> 01:02:56.000]  The moral? Things aren't always what they seem, so think before you shoot.
[01:02:56.000 --> 01:02:57.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:02:57.000 --> 01:03:12.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:40.000]  All right folks, we are back. This is Woolif Law Radio.
[01:03:40.000 --> 01:03:43.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:43.000 --> 01:03:49.000]  We have a little bit under an hour left in the show, so get in line now folks.
[01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:51.000]  All right, who are we on with?
[01:03:51.000 --> 01:03:53.000]  Greg in Minnesota?
[01:03:53.000 --> 01:03:55.000]  Yes.
[01:03:55.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  All right, let's get back to Greg.
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:03:59.000]  Okay, Greg.
[01:03:59.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  Okay, just a quick question.
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:05.000]  So if you were to say it was your brother, what would you do?
[01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:08.000]  Would you just kind of call him up and work out arrangements?
[01:04:08.000 --> 01:04:09.000]  Like a payment arrangement?
[01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:13.000]  Maybe try to get them to stop garnishing the wages if it's good?
[01:04:13.000 --> 01:04:17.000]  Work out something in that respect first?
[01:04:17.000 --> 01:04:19.000]  Well, we do have somebody on here.
[01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:21.000]  We'll make a comment on it if you want to let him on, Randy.
[01:04:21.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  It's Dan and Connecticut.
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:27.000]  We hadn't talked to him in a long time anyway.
[01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:30.000]  Actually, he likes to call in when you're not here.
[01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:33.000]  Oh, okay. Maybe he's trying to tell me something.
[01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:35.000]  Go ahead, Dan.
[01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:38.000]  Okay, could you rephrase that question for a second?
[01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  I flipped out for a minute. My phone cut out.
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:44.000]  He's talking to you, Greg. What was your question?
[01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:52.000]  No, I was just wondering if, like if Randy or Eddie, if your brother was in trouble like mine and you're trying to help him,
[01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:54.000]  they wouldn't do it themselves, but you'll let me do it.
[01:04:54.000 --> 01:04:56.000]  They'd love to help me do it.
[01:04:56.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  Would you just kind of call them up on the phone and give you lots of phone numbers and just try to set some sort of an arrangement for the payments?
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:16.000]  I would get a CPA and get a CPA to find out what they want and have him negotiate a way to give them what they want
[01:05:16.000 --> 01:05:22.000]  so that they will get their case satisfied and him not go to jail.
[01:05:22.000 --> 01:05:30.000]  Well, I had an alternative idea because as soon as I had a problem, the first thing I did was, in response to their junk mail,
[01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:36.000]  was file a FOIA request and when they didn't answer that FOIA request, I filed another one.
[01:05:36.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  So their claim is for five grand and now I've got 18 grand in FOIA violations.
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  And the really neat thing about it is not only have they not answered anything,
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  if it ever does go to litigation, the way I handle it is, you know, I don't have enough information to respond.
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:05:57.000]  You know, I don't admit to anything.
[01:05:57.000 --> 01:06:00.000]  I don't even put the social security number and say, hey, I got this letter.
[01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  And if it does come to litigation, one thing I never hear about people who are fighting the IRS mention is interrogatories and admissions.
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  It seems that nobody files any of them.
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:20.000]  It just seemed weird to me, you know, and when I was thinking about it more and more, I'm going like, wait a minute.
[01:06:20.000 --> 01:06:24.000]  You know, I mean, I'm not surprised about that.
[01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:30.000]  But I had a few other things to mention later if you want to put me back on hold,
[01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:38.000]  including a very interesting copy of the Internal Revenue Manual owned by a former vice presidential candidate.
[01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:41.000]  Oh, interesting. Yes, I would like to talk about that.
[01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:49.000]  And we'll come back to you as soon as we finish with Greg and Johnny.
[01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:52.000]  Okay, we'll get back to you, Dan.
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  If there's any way I can get a hold of Dan and maybe, I don't know, if he can filter.
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  He's more than happy to, you know, I think.
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:08.000]  Send me and send me an email at randyruleslawradio.com and I will forward it to Dan.
[01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:11.000]  All right, good enough. Well, I'm going to get off the phone and listen.
[01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  Okay. All right, thanks.
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:16.000]  Thank you, Greg.
[01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:21.000]  Now we're going to go to Johnny in Texas.
[01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:23.000]  Hey, guys.
[01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:26.000]  How did Johnny, what do you got for us tonight?
[01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:28.000]  Hello.
[01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:31.000]  Hey, guys. How are you?
[01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:34.000]  How are you? We're doing good.
[01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  Randy, I have a question for you related to the mortgage case I'm involved in.
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:46.000]  There's a lot to it. I'll try to summarize it briefly.
[01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:54.000]  In 2009, my home was foreclosed on and it was sold.
[01:07:54.000 --> 01:08:01.000]  And the way I found out about that was about two months later I got served with the summons to appear in eviction court.
[01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  I had just a few days to prepare for that, find out what on earth was going on.
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:18.000]  I ended up getting through the eviction hearing favorably and raised some issues with the proposing servicer
[01:08:18.000 --> 01:08:27.000]  related to things that they were required to do under federal law prior to any foreclosure attempt, which they failed to do.
[01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  Okay, wait a minute. What jurisdiction is in? What state?
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:33.000]  Texas.
[01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:36.000]  Texas, okay.
[01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  You have a deed of trust?
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:39.000]  Yep.
[01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:43.000]  Have you looked at paragraph 20 of the deed of trust?
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:46.000]  I've looked at all of the deed of trust.
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  The paragraph 20 is the one that authorizes the lender of the beneficiary to sell a portion of the note of the entire note one or more times.
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  Okay.
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  And transfer or assign the note.
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:19.000]  And then right behind note, there'll be a bracket and it will say, together with this security instrument, closed bracket.
[01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:21.000]  Yes, and I say all of that.
[01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:23.000]  Okay.
[01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:26.000]  Do you have an assignment?
[01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:28.000]  Two of them actually.
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:29.000]  Okay.
[01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:31.000]  Let me just walk you through the brief history.
[01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:38.000]  I got the eviction hearing. I raised some no-no's that they committed and they said, well, maybe we can work with you.
[01:09:38.000 --> 01:09:42.000]  So they did a, they dropped the eviction case.
[01:09:42.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  They did a full rescission and a rescission of the sale and a reconveyance of the title and warranty deed and all that back into my name.
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:55.000]  And promised to work with me then, so I failed to meet those promises.
[01:09:55.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  And now, you know, they're trying to preclose again.
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:10.000]  During that process, when this was all back at the eviction court and when they were agreeing to drop the force of voluntary entertainer,
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:17.000]  the opposing council sent me as a basis for the rescission.
[01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:23.000]  They sent me an order, a word document.
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:27.000]  It's an order setting aside order allowing for closure.
[01:10:27.000 --> 01:10:33.000]  Okay. And I was a little bit green on this stuff at the time, so they, I kind of got mated on this issue.
[01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:43.000]  But the document says cause number of blank in reorder for closure in the blank judicial district court, Darin County, Texas.
[01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  And it says, after reviewing the file, the court finds that the order allowing for closure signed on November 3rd, 2009 should be set aside.
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:59.000]  It therefore ordered that the order allowing for closure signed on November 3rd, 2009 be set aside.
[01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:03.000]  They wanted me to jointly agree to this.
[01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:08.000]  They wanted me to print it off, sign it, and send it back to them for them to file.
[01:11:08.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  Okay. So, you know, I didn't get the cause number or which district court it was in at the time,
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:20.000]  but this tells me that on November 3rd, 2009, there was an original order allowing for closure.
[01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:24.000]  In other words, bank had to go to the court and say, we want an order allowing for closure.
[01:11:24.000 --> 01:11:28.000]  No. No, this is a non-judicial state.
[01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  Well, that's part that I don't get.
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:39.000]  Okay. There's no cause number because there's no cause number, there's no order needed.
[01:11:39.000 --> 01:11:43.000]  I don't know why they would do something like that.
[01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:48.000]  They issued, they acted on the deed of trust.
[01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:55.000]  Okay. And they certainly could, on their own volition,
[01:11:55.000 --> 01:12:00.000]  rescind their sale.
[01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:02.000]  They don't, there's no order needed.
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:11.000]  I'm not sure what that was about other than it was just to show your agreement or that they were working with you.
[01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:18.000]  I'm not sure what that would be about, but I can't imagine any force and effect that it would have.
[01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:23.000]  Yeah. Well, and I was just curious about it because I've looked through records in the district clerk's office
[01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  and the county clerk's office and I cannot find any closure related to my property, you know,
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:31.000]  order allowing for closure on that date.
[01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  Okay. That was, this was where I was going earlier.
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  When you wrote the note, you created the trust.
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:45.000]  Yep. I created the money too.
[01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:47.000]  Now, we're not going to go there.
[01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:50.000]  That's money's irrelevant.
[01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:55.000]  It was a offer in acceptance.
[01:12:55.000 --> 01:13:06.000]  So they made an offer to trade you a warranty deed for a promissory note.
[01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:11.000]  And how they got the warranty deed, that's none of your business.
[01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:14.000]  If they got it with no money, how are they got the money?
[01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  Actually, almost certainly they got the money from the pool.
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:25.000]  But that's a little complex. I'll go into that another time, how they got the money.
[01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:29.000]  But for our purposes, it doesn't matter how that happened.
[01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:32.000]  There was a offer in acceptance.
[01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:43.000]  They offered you a warranty deed in return for a promissory note and a deed of trust that acts as a confessed judgment.
[01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:48.000]  Normally, a confessed judgment in a contract is forbidden.
[01:13:48.000 --> 01:13:59.000]  But the number of the legislatures for a number of states passed special legislation that allowed mortgage companies to accept a confessed judgment.
[01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  And what if that instrument has been invalidated in a number of ways?
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:08.000]  That's exactly where I'm going.
[01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:17.000]  If you hire me to work on your house and I expend labor and I expend materials.
[01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:24.000]  The expending of the labor and the materials creates a lien against property.
[01:14:24.000 --> 01:14:31.000]  I can file notice of that lien in the form of a mechanics lien.
[01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:46.000]  But I can't collect it unless I file an action in court and petition the court to issue me a judgment against your property based on the lien.
[01:14:46.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  And that's the way in judicial states a mortgage company forecloses these exact same procedure.
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  Well, the non-judicial states instituted the deed of trust, which acts as a confessed judgment.
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:13.000]  So you contractually agree to allow the lender to foreclose without the formality of going to the court and asking for a judgment.
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:31.000]  Correct. However, you issued the confessed judgment on the condition that any sale or transfer of the note was made together with this security instrument.
[01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:46.000]  Your first assignment that shows a transfer of the security instrument but does not reflect transfer of the note or a negotiation of the note.
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  You don't transfer the note, you negotiate it, you transfer the lien.
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:56.000]  Well, they were required to be done together and maybe they were.
[01:15:56.000 --> 01:16:06.000]  And the lender is not required to file notice of the negotiation of the note in the court record.
[01:16:06.000 --> 01:16:17.000]  But it would be a really smart thing to do because if he doesn't and you have a notice of transfer of the lien document,
[01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:30.000]  but no notice of negotiation of the note in the same entity, then you have reasonable probable cause to believe that the lender breached the deed of trust contract.
[01:16:30.000 --> 01:16:37.000]  So you immediately file a letter to the trustee firing the trustee.
[01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:42.000]  You file that letter in the county record showing that he's been fired.
[01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  And you go to the district court and ask in the court to render the deed of trust void and of no effect.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  Now the lender can no longer avail himself of the expediency of a non-judicial foreclosure.
[01:16:56.000 --> 01:16:57.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:16:57.000 --> 01:16:58.000]  Randy Kelton.
[01:16:58.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  Steve with Eddie Craig.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:12.000]  Capital Coin & Bullion is a family-owned business built on the promise to bring you affordable pricing on all coin and bullion products.
[01:17:12.000 --> 01:17:15.000]  In addition to coins and bullions, we now offer storeable freeze-dried foods produced by Augustin Farms,
[01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:21.000]  ammunition at 10% above wholesale prices, Berkey Water Products, gift certificates, and our Silver Pool,
[01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:25.000]  a new way to guarantee silver by prepaying at a locked price.
[01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:28.000]  We can even help you set up a metals IRA account.
[01:17:28.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  Call us at 512-646-644-0 for more details.
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:40.000]  As always, we buy, sell, and trade precious metals, give appraisals, and cater to those with all sizes of coin collections.
[01:17:40.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half a mile north of Canig,
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  next to the Ikiban Sushi and Genie Car Wash.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-644-0 and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:25.000]  That's why our name is FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  Finally, residential, mobile, and business telephones and plans that are private and never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  When a low price, residential and business plans started only $14.99 and mobile plans started just $39.99.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:44.000]  Plus, every month you pay your bill, FreedomTelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs.
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  Don't wait. Support the cause and get the highest quality and the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553.
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:18:56.000]  That's 800-600-5553.
[01:18:56.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  FreedomTelephones.com. Portable, private, perfect.
[01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:25.000]  Oh, come on.
[01:19:25.000 --> 01:19:30.000]  Okay, we're back.
[01:19:30.000 --> 01:19:33.000]  We're back.
[01:19:33.000 --> 01:19:43.000]  We're talking to Johnny in Texas and when I went out I was explaining what the deed of trust is.
[01:19:43.000 --> 01:19:53.000]  It's a confessed judgment and it gives the lender an expedient and inexpensive way of foreclosing.
[01:19:53.000 --> 01:20:07.000]  But since the foreclosure is done without judicial oversight, the lender is required to scrupulously abide by all relevant law.
[01:20:07.000 --> 01:20:20.000]  And here we claim a breach of the tenets of the security instruments almost immediately after the transaction was entered into.
[01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:30.000]  As a matter of fact, it was the intention of the lender to breach the contract immediately after consummation.
[01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:41.000]  So we asked the court to render that this document, providing an expedient foreclosure method, be rendered void,
[01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:53.000]  and that the lender be forced to come to the court in petition for a judgment just like they would for any other lien.
[01:20:53.000 --> 01:20:59.000]  Now, if they've already foreclosed, they got a problem.
[01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:03.000]  If they're in the process of foreclosing, it all stops.
[01:21:03.000 --> 01:21:20.000]  And now they have to come to court, now the first thing you do is challenge the attorney's agency and what we're doing is we're going after the lawyer.
[01:21:20.000 --> 01:21:34.000]  We're saying that the lawyer has brought this claim for an alleged principal who allegedly has agency and capacity.
[01:21:34.000 --> 01:21:36.000]  And we don't think he has either one.
[01:21:36.000 --> 01:21:44.000]  We think the lawyer knows that or the lawyer had a duty to know that before he instituted this frivolous suit.
[01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  And the lawyers get real unhappy when you sue them personally.
[01:21:48.000 --> 01:22:03.000]  And their problem is, is if their client cannot prove up standing and capacity, then the lawyer can't prove up agency.
[01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:07.000]  We didn't sue the lender, we sued the lawyer.
[01:22:07.000 --> 01:22:11.000]  We can go back later and sue the lender.
[01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:14.000]  Okay, did that make sense, Johnny?
[01:22:14.000 --> 01:22:18.000]  Yes, absolutely, absolutely.
[01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:26.000]  In my case, I've got attorneys for the bank who have signed as officers of, you know, another corporation.
[01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  I know you know about all of that.
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  So basically what you're talking about is more like a declaratory judgment on each document.
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:38.000]  Yes, exactly.
[01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:45.000]  You just, you go to the district court and ask the district court to correct the public record.
[01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:46.000]  Okay.
[01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  And also look at the assignments.
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:23:04.000]  If you can find an anomaly on the notary documents or like we just found today, a two day difference between the date the document was signed and the date it was supposed to be notarized.
[01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:06.000]  Yes, well I'm looking at mine right now.
[01:23:06.000 --> 01:23:22.000]  One appointment of substitute trustee has the vice president of loan documentation for Wells Fargo Bank who is in fact counsel for their debt collection attorney firm.
[01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:30.000]  It says executed on September 25, 2009 and 25 is scratched out and 14 is handwritten in.
[01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:43.000]  And then under that the corporate acknowledgement part and then the notary says that this individual personally appeared before her given under my hand and seal of office this 25 days of September 2009.
[01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:45.000]  25 is scratched out.
[01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:52.000]  September is scratched out and 2009 is rubber stamped with October 1, 2009.
[01:23:52.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  That's enough.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:07.000]  That's what I'm going to tell you. I've got another, the rescission was executed by a well-known robo signer and it was supposedly notarized in North Carolina and Texas on January 13.
[01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:13.000]  I mean, just notarization alone, I've gotten multiple documents.
[01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:28.000]  What I suggest is you not only petition the court for declaratory judgment and this is generally an expert to hearing.
[01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:33.000]  It's in the property code 51-903.
[01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:35.000]  903, you're already up on that.
[01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  Yes.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:38.000]  So you know how to get there.
[01:24:38.000 --> 01:24:46.000]  If you do that, if you don't have time to do that and you're already in litigation, you know, what? Well, if you're not already...
[01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:54.000]  No, no, no, wait. You don't understand. This is separate. You do this while you're in litigation.
[01:24:54.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  Okay.
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  You're in the state court of the federal state.
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:07.000]  Question. What's your take on the judges?
[01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:11.000]  Are they?
[01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:16.000]  Are they making your argument serious or did you just blow them all off?
[01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  As a matter of fact, the day that I took my original petition to the court, you know, there's a main district clerk's office where you file it and then they decide which court it's going to go to and then they take you upstairs to see the judge and talk about your petition and all that.
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  The chief administrative clerk thought that I was still out in the hallway, was not aware that I was sitting just around her cubicle.
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:54.000]  And when she was handed my motion for temporary restraining order, she started yelling and cussing and saying, oh, my God, you know, another TRO, where are these, you know,
[01:25:54.000 --> 01:26:05.000]  expletives people coming from? And then when she realized that I was there, she, you know, of course, got real nice. A few minutes later, I was walked across the hall to go over the petition with the judge.
[01:26:05.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  And that conversation lasted about 20 minutes. And during that 20 minutes, she basically told me, you know, you can't live in a house for free unless you work out payment arrangements with the bank.
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  By the time we come back for the hearing on the TRO, I'm not sure I'm going to continue to enforce this. I'm not sure you can afford the mortgage payments anymore.
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  You need to get an attorney. I don't believe you have the legal training required to pull this off. And I'm not so sure that you're going to win this case even on appeal.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  And I said, well, it sounds to me like this case has already been decided. So I basically turned the TRO hearing into a recusal hearing. Perfect.
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  Yeah, I referred to another judge and denied, of course. And this judge in particular.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:59.000]  Hold on. Hold on. Did they send the recusal to the administrative judge's district?
[01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:11.000]  Yes. Under the rules, their option is to either grant the motion right then or refer it to the Chief Administrative Judge for a hearing on the motion and they did the latter.
[01:27:11.000 --> 01:27:18.000]  Yeah. You might have considered a motion to disqualify for incompetence.
[01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  Well, we're way past the stage now. Let me explain incompetence. When you hear incompetence, you think about your great-grandpa who can't remember his own name anymore. That's not what we're talking about.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:44.000]  We're talking about him being incompetent and rule fairly as a matter of law because he's demonstrated clear bias.
[01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:53.000]  Oh, absolutely. And I've raised that issue and, you know, I've lost the number of motions on everyone I've objected and demanded.
[01:27:53.000 --> 01:27:57.000]  Have you filed a judicial conduct complaint against him?
[01:27:57.000 --> 01:27:59.000]  Not yet, no.
[01:27:59.000 --> 01:28:13.000]  Do so. The sooner, the better. It's clear he's going to rule against you out of hand at every turn. If you start filing judicial conduct complaints against him, then you can claim he's doing it out of retaliation.
[01:28:13.000 --> 01:28:18.000]  Yep. Yeah, well, I definitely will.
[01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:25.000]  Go ahead. He's not going to cut you any slack. There's no reason for you to cut him any slack.
[01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:34.000]  They decided the case the first time, you know, within the first 20 minutes that I ever even saw the judge's face. I mean, they made it real clear that case was already decided.
[01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:49.000]  Yeah, so that may change. You know, attitudes change when you start getting beat up and the judicial conduct commission is up for sunset this term.
[01:28:49.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  I'm coming down to Austin to Sunday and we'll have a hearing Tuesday on the Sunset Commission, Sunsetting the Judicial Conduct Commission, and we're working on giving or a run this time.
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:14.000]  So this is probably a really good time to start filing judicial conduct complaints.
[01:29:14.000 --> 01:29:19.000]  Absolutely. Sounds like it's a perfect time.
[01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:22.000]  Okay, do you have any other questions or issues?
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  Yeah, I just want to recap. As far as challenging these documents, I've got clear grounds. I can bring them as a declaratory judgment. If I'm not already in litigation and if I am, I can just schedule hearings for it correct.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  Yes, and you might look at 3710 penal code tampered with government document. That's a felony in Texas. Ouch.
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  This is Randy Calton, Debbie Stephen, Daddy Craig, will blow radio, call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  A NOBLE LIFE, Oklahoma City, 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:11.000]  Based on the damage pattern to the building, but the government seems impossible.
[01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:23.000]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:27.000]  The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  Dispose the cover-up now at anoblelife.com.
[01:30:57.000 --> 01:31:01.000]  See what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[01:31:27.000 --> 01:31:33.000]  Even with the science of modern nutrition, adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component.
[01:31:33.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  And organic hemp protein in greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  Plus, centrition tastes great in just water.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product, and it's all natural.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  Visit centrition.com to order yours, or call 1-866-497-7436.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:25.000]  After you use centrition, you'll believe in supplements again.
[01:32:25.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  Hi folks, we are back.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:29.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:33.000]  We are in the last half hour of the show in Hittker.
[01:32:33.000 --> 01:32:36.000]  Right now we're going to go to Dan in Connecticut.
[01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Dan, what you got for us?
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:41.000]  Well, we'll grab back things.
[01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:47.000]  The first thing I want to mention is we've got the Libertarian Party of Connecticut's annual 2012 convention.
[01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:54.000]  It's happening tomorrow at the Ramada, that's 50 Morgan Street in Hartford, Connecticut.
[01:32:54.000 --> 01:33:04.000]  If you go to the door, I think we're going to cut it down from 55 to 50 bucks because people in trouble are registering online due to a website error.
[01:33:04.000 --> 01:33:16.000]  But anyway, the interesting thing about that particular convention is we have a whole bunch of books from a former vice presidential candidate by the name of Jim Lewis.
[01:33:16.000 --> 01:33:31.000]  He was actually the 1984 nominee and one of the books that we are auctioning off is his personal copy of the 1982 internal revenue code with all of his original bookmarks included.
[01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:33.000]  Cool.
[01:33:33.000 --> 01:33:35.000]  It's a really doggier copy too.
[01:33:35.000 --> 01:33:39.000]  Jim Lewis contributed a lot to the party.
[01:33:39.000 --> 01:33:47.000]  I think once you see this book, it's just something to say. It's all marked up.
[01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:51.000]  It's really something that's kind of museum quality. I thought it was neat.
[01:33:51.000 --> 01:34:00.000]  The other thing I did want to mention is that my wife ran into a rule of law listener at an anime convention tonight, believe it or not.
[01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:05.000]  She was there reporting for an anime podcast.
[01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:10.000]  We have people that watch anime and listen to us.
[01:34:10.000 --> 01:34:16.000]  Yes. You guys are everywhere. I just talked to her before I called in.
[01:34:16.000 --> 01:34:24.000]  She was like, oh yeah, he knew who the rule of law radio was. It turns out it was somebody that does pro bono legal work too.
[01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:27.000]  That's cool.
[01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:36.000]  Aside from that, there's nothing else going on. I just figured it would be interesting to mention those things.
[01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:45.000]  I just wanted to let you guys know that you're getting big and you're getting into quite the assortment of different circles of notoriety.
[01:34:45.000 --> 01:35:00.000]  Well, that's good to know. I know that we've got people that have sent us fan mail and requests for assistance and just general questions from Ireland, New Zealand, England.
[01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:05.000]  We've got a worldwide audience, believe it or not.
[01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:09.000]  Australia for that matter.
[01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:21.000]  I'm actually kind of surprised, but I'm extremely glad that we're doing something that's drawing attention to what's being done worldwide, not just in this country, but in every country,
[01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  and giving people the hope that there's a way to fight back if they can just learn the rules well enough to put them to use.
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  Yeah, and on that note, I do want to mention that, and this is something I'm going to bring up at our convention since I'm the chair and all, that this sort of thing is just the natural evolution of the way things have gone,
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  because our convention is kind of like what you guys do. It evolved from a discussion of, hey, what's wrong toward what can we do about it?
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:36:05.000]  I mean, for example, we have two speakers that are talking about a lobby that was set up, believe it or not, for the Constitution, which everybody is a lobbying organization,
[01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:18.000]  but the Constitution never had it, and they're going to be the keynote. Another one of our speakers is actually an attorney, and he's going to talk about how the practice of law itself has been affected by overreaching government.
[01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:36.000]  And we've got another guy talking about the Apple Seed Project, which trains everybody not only to hit a target within 500 yards, but it's also a course in history on April 19, 1775, which was the battle of Lexington and Concord.
[01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:51.000]  But yeah, one thing I can definitely say is I think this year is going to bring a lot of exciting things, and I'm just kind of glad that things like the rule of law and all these other organizations seem to be coming to a head,
[01:36:51.000 --> 01:37:05.000]  and it looks like we have a pretty united front that obviously, based on what I said earlier, is really reaching into every kind of subculture and niche, I think, even beyond what you guys had imagined.
[01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  Well, that's good. We definitely appreciate that kind of news.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:16.000]  But yeah, anyway, you never thought anime fans would be in too legal reform, but now you know.
[01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:21.000]  Yeah, hey, works for me. I'm not going to be the complainer.
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:30.000]  Yeah, but anyway, I'm going to let you go, and I'm going to attend to my federal suit against a state trooper, and I will talk with you soon.
[01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:33.000]  All right, Dan, thanks for calling in. Appreciate it.
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:35.000]  Okay, keep up a good work.
[01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:37.000]  All right, y'all have a good night.
[01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:44.000]  All right, now let's see, we have Ken in Maryland. Ken, what can we do for you?
[01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:51.000]  I just want to thank you guys for, I've been a long time listener and thinking of my first time caller now.
[01:37:51.000 --> 01:38:10.000]  And my friend Rich, he called in earlier and turned me back on to you guys. I'm just trying to figure out what network you guys are on now, and I've been listening since you guys were on WTPRN.
[01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:21.000]  Well, we are on our own network. It's going over to the Logos radio network is what we're changing over to. What were you going to say, Randy?
[01:38:21.000 --> 01:38:29.000]  Yeah, I said, it's good to hear that you've been around that long. I'd almost forgot about it if it had been so long ago.
[01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:31.000]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:35.000]  Those are good days. Those are exciting days.
[01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:43.000]  Well, they were. And you know, God willing, we'll still see some more exciting days. It's a great time to be alive.
[01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:51.000]  Absolutely. I think this is the most interesting time in the history of mankind to be alive on the planet.
[01:38:51.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  I believe if this thing could have a choice, they would want to be alive right now. It seems like it's like when the orchestra is in the pit and they're warming up their instruments and the curtains are off, back to ride.
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:13.000]  We're here at the right time, right place.
[01:39:13.000 --> 01:39:24.000]  I spent most of my life having no idea what I was doing here and it was all prepping me to be where I am right now.
[01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  Yeah, sometimes you don't have a clue, but then you walk down the road and you have an opportunity to look back and you say, that's why.
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:52.000]  You know, you don't know until later. Like I said, it's a beautiful time to be alive and I pray for all those ones that were the shoulders that were standing on, the ones that are now currently incarcerated.
[01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:59.000]  I reach out to everybody listening out there to pray for those that are political prisoners.
[01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:12.000]  And I think you know who I'm talking about. I'm not going to mention any names. I mean, there's too many that are inside and there's a lot that have passed.
[01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:20.000]  Hey, hey, it's not me. I hadn't passed yet and I'm out.
[01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:21.000]  But not by much.
[01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:26.000]  Not by much. Okay. Do you have anything else for us, Ken?
[01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:32.000]  Well, like I said, I just wanted to thank you guys. I spoke to Frank earlier and he gave me the list in line.
[01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:48.000]  I'm going to hop over on the list in line and I want to collaborate with the story about the state trooper. He called me about 119 in the morning and I was able to hear all that nonsense that these guys were doing.
[01:40:48.000 --> 01:40:50.000]  Yeah.
[01:40:50.000 --> 01:41:02.000]  Okay. Well, thank you very much. And now we're going to go to Carlos in California if he can keep from dropping off.
[01:41:02.000 --> 01:41:04.000]  There we go. Carlos, see you there.
[01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:05.000]  Random.
[01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:06.000]  Ah, good.
[01:41:06.000 --> 01:41:10.000]  Good, good. I was just recharging my phone.
[01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:15.000]  I have something very, very, very interesting to you.
[01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  Highly interesting.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  Okay.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:36.000]  I knew about a group that they were discharging their property, their mortgage. Mortgage is anything, right? Mortgage is a car. It's anything that has to do with paying back.
[01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  I always wanted to find out about it.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  Before I get disconnected, everybody, where do you go?
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:44.000]  Yes.
[01:41:44.000 --> 01:41:50.000]  It's a regress, right?.org, regress.org.
[01:41:50.000 --> 01:42:03.000]  Randall, this guy's amazing. He teaches you how to pay them back with the promissor note. Let me put it in a nutshell.
[01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:14.000]  Whenever, and he backs it up with law. It's not a BS. He backs it up with law. Everything is under the agricultural.
[01:42:14.000 --> 01:42:26.000]  Chapter 7, 1901.08. Look at him. He says there, you will pay to the order of the United States of America. That's the secret.
[01:42:26.000 --> 01:42:28.000]  What are we doing?
[01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:34.000]  We're taking our promissor note, signing it as they do it.
[01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:44.000]  Pay to the United States of America without recourse. Signing it, once you sign it, it's an original. It's in the law and it's for real.
[01:42:44.000 --> 01:42:48.000]  I'm just happy to tell you guys about it.
[01:42:48.000 --> 01:42:52.000]  Can you send me a link to that?
[01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  Because I have talked to people for quite a while about this sort of thing.
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  Randall, he shows you on YouTube. He shows you how to do it. He shows you how he did it. He's a black guy.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  You know I love everybody, right? I'm Mexican. I love everybody. He's amazing. He does everything for free.
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:29.000]  You and me. He's just helping everybody for free. Randall, we have to take advantage of the opportunity when we can because they're going to take it away from us.
[01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:41.000]  Yes. Well, I want to see that because I've talked to Winston Shrout and Tim Turner and I haven't got any backing.
[01:43:41.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  Okay, we're about to go to break. Hang on, Carlos. I'll come back with my cell phone.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:55.000]  Okay, okay. We'll pick you up when you come back. This is Randy Calton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[01:43:55.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  We'll leave our radio. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  Hey, did you hear? Ron Paul has announced he's running for president in 2012.
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  It is Ron Paul.
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:11.000]  Really? Okay, put down the cell phone for one minute. Your friends really don't care about your Twitter updates on what you had for breakfast.
[01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:14.000]  Oh, but I love to make those little smiley faces with punctuation marks.
[01:44:14.000 --> 01:44:21.000]  Of course you do. Now, listen closely. You need to go down to Brave New Books and learn as much as you can about Ron Paul and his message before it's too late.
[01:44:21.000 --> 01:44:29.000]  They have all of his books and many of the books he talks about. They also have t-shirts, bumper stickers, and yard signs so that you can show your support for him during the campaign.
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:31.000]  Brave New Books? Did they have Harry Potter and Twilight?
[01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:37.000]  No, but they do carry a large selection of survival and preparedness books to protect your family in time of emergency.
[01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:40.000]  Ugh, that sounds like that show in the Discovery Channel.
[01:44:40.000 --> 01:44:48.000]  Yeah, there's even a wilderness survival expert that teaches classes called Earth Skills School that you can sign up for on the website BraveNewBooksStore.com. What are you doing?
[01:44:48.000 --> 01:44:54.000]  I'm tweeting all my friends that they should go to BraveNewBooksStore.com or down to the bookstore in person. Where's it located?
[01:44:54.000 --> 01:44:56.000]  1904, Guadalupe Street.
[01:44:56.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  There, it's sent. I even made a smiley face.
[01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  Great.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.000 --> 01:46:41.000]  Hi, folks. We are in our last segment of rule of law radio on this Friday night. Randy, you were dealing with Carlos in California. You want to pick that back up?
[01:46:41.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  Yes. Carlos?
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:46.000]  Yes, I'm here.
[01:46:46.000 --> 01:46:59.000]  There was kind of some details on that because I've talked to Winston Shroud, I've talked to Tim Turner, I've looked over their materials, and they had a lot of interesting information, but no statutory backup.
[01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  And I once talked to Winston Shroud on his show and asked him, you know, I told him that, you know, I'm a creature of statute.
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:10.000]  Right.
[01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:14.000]  And so where do you get this from? And he said, well, I figured it out.
[01:47:14.000 --> 01:47:30.000]  Randall, Randall, see, they had everybody, please, please, please, please listen to me. I'm for real. And I'm just giving out the, I'm just spreading the good news because before they take our right to do it, please do it, do it.
[01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:40.000]  This is what's going on. And this is where they had it. They had it under the United States Department of Agriculture. Can you believe that?
[01:47:40.000 --> 01:47:46.000]  I'll show you in the law. And this is good. I've heard that before.
[01:47:46.000 --> 01:47:55.000]  Okay. It says, it says real clear. It says, you will sign P2R of the United States of America. Why am I paying to the United States of America?
[01:47:55.000 --> 01:48:08.000]  That's how they collect our money. Why don't we do the same thing and pay them and get it off? He has done it. He's spreading out the word and he's been pregnant.
[01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:15.000]  I hope they don't do any harm to him. But he's the nicest guy. He's like you and me, Randall, like he said.
[01:48:15.000 --> 01:48:26.000]  Send me an email. I will go look at this because I have certainly been looking for the statutory support. That's what nobody else could give me.
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:42.000]  It's under the United States Department of Agriculture. Don't call me 100%, but I think, by my memory, it's 1901.508. It says very clearly, you will sign P2R of Agriculture.
[01:48:42.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  For everybody that's listening, that's all there. Take your notes. Make a copy. Take your notes. And you know what the secret is? You have to pay P2R of the United States of America and you have to know where to send it.
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:00.000]  He tells you exactly where to send it.
[01:49:00.000 --> 01:49:02.000]  Good. Good.
[01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:04.000]  Every state has a department.
[01:49:04.000 --> 01:49:15.000]  I will take a real close look at it. And if I can support this with statute, I will absolutely promote it. But I have been very reluctant to promote this kind of thing because...
[01:49:15.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  You know me. You know I don't BS, right?
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  Yes, I do. Yes, I do. But I have been called around the country to try to help keep people out of jail who's been doing similar things. So I'm really dubious about it and I will be extremely careful.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:52.000]  Okay. Now. Now. Now. He doesn't do anything before he tries to do his own. And he has done money orders. And he has done a lot of EFT. He says it works. But the best thing, what I'm trying to help, who I'm trying to help is people who are losing their homes.
[01:49:52.000 --> 01:50:13.000]  Because you had a few months ago. Yes. Randolph, this is him. If I can find the support for it, I will suggest people do it. I just want to make sure that I don't suggest someone do something that wind up getting put in jail like these 1099 OIDs and such.
[01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:30.000]  No, no, no. This is not 1099 OID. You know what the problem is with 1099 OID? It is for real. You have to know how to do it. It is for real. I've been doing that all my life. But let's concentrate on mortgages for people who are losing their homes.
[01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:50.000]  Once, once, once, you send them the note. If it was me, what I would do, I send them an EFT. I would send them an EFT and on the black law dictionary it says to pay off and set up debt.
[01:50:50.000 --> 01:51:07.000]  Yes. It's a winning. But you know, I don't want to get sidetracked from what I'm talking about the promise or note. Okay. Well, I'm going to be careful with it. So if you'll send me an email with the link, I will go have a look at it.
[01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:23.000]  Well, I want to tell everybody to go to a re-re-dress-write.org on YouTube. You're going to find in that. He has a funny music. Will you spell that whole thing?
[01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:46.000]  Re-dress-write. Oh, redress. Okay. Redress.org. This is huge. This is huge. I'm really excited. I don't know if you can probably tell them my voice. I want to tell everybody before they take our right because they're going to do it.
[01:51:46.000 --> 01:51:57.000]  This is huge. Okay. Good. Okay. I will have a look at it and I will probably want to talk to you next week about it. I will tell you. Okay. Thank you. Okay. Thank you.
[01:51:57.000 --> 01:52:13.000]  Okay. Now we're going to go to John in Ohio. John, what have you got for us? That's Jim in Ohio. Oh, I'm sorry. Jim in Ohio.
[01:52:13.000 --> 01:52:26.000]  Yeah, I had a couple of quick questions for you here before the end. I'm going before a mayor's court. First time I've ever been before a mayor's court on Wednesday evening.
[01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:47.000]  Wait a minute. Did you say a mayor's court? Mayor's court, yes. Oh, okay. On traffic and before the three counts. What state are you in? You're in Ohio? Ohio. I've never heard of a mayor's court. Really?
[01:52:47.000 --> 01:53:08.000]  Is a mayor considered a judicial officer? Well, I think he was hired for the job because of all the hats that he has, obviously. He would be mayor, magistrate, judge.
[01:53:08.000 --> 01:53:23.000]  Okay. Okay. Mayor and magistrate. All mayors are magistrates. But the judge, that's something else. That is unusual. Okay. Go ahead. I've interrupted.
[01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:48.000]  Well, that's related to one of the questions. First question that I wanted to ask you is something that you mentioned when I was first listening to you a few years ago about that there was a statute and I couldn't remember whether it was federal or whether that was something in Texas code that says if a public official is found to be saying that it is accepted in law that they know exactly what they're doing.
[01:53:48.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  That was screws of the U.S. Oh, that's just do a search for screws the U.S. You'll get a hit right on it. Okay, that's case law.
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:18.000]  Yes, case law. It goes to cases about two sheriff and two deputies in a bar, Mississippi, 1943 or 44. It's a 45 case.
[01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:31.000]  They're upset at this black guy. They're drinking, going to go arrest him. Bartender tries to talk him out of it. They won't be dissuaded. They arrest the guy and wind up beating him to death on the courthouse steps.
[01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:43.000]  They're prosecuted. They're sued in the state. Then they're sued again in the Fed and they complain to the court that they didn't have adequate notice that they could be sued both in the state and the Fed.
[01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:53.000]  And the court told him that a private citizen cannot claim ignorance of the law as a defense to prosecution.
[01:54:53.000 --> 01:55:11.000]  A public official is held to a much higher standard. If a public official violates a ruling of this court and he be saying he may not be heard to say he knows not what he does.
[01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:21.000]  That is still very good law. It has lots of progeny. Is that what you were looking for?
[01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:35.000]  Yes, and in questions of jurisdiction, what they would come back, you know, their retorts to me, I want to hold that over their heads if it comes into play.
[01:55:35.000 --> 01:55:56.000]  The first thing was about your question of the mayor's court. Would the mayor, if he tries, does he not have to have a separate oath of office in both the state and the Fed in each particular?
[01:55:56.000 --> 01:56:14.000]  Not necessarily. If, okay, if this is a mayor's court, then most likely the court was created for this purpose. So it is an intrinsic part of the duty of the mayor.
[01:56:14.000 --> 01:56:31.000]  I would think his mayor's oath would cover him for any of the intended duties of the mayor. But what you really want more than the oath is his bond.
[01:56:31.000 --> 01:56:50.000]  That was a lot more fun to punch a hole in. So any complaint you send against the judge to do some conduct or grand jury or whatever, you also send it to his bond holder. They would not be happy.
[01:56:50.000 --> 01:57:17.000]  Yes. Well, two other quick points that I'm foggy on is how to speak about the officer at NHIMN, how to speak about the officer not being someone who can bring a citizen,
[01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:34.000]  someone outside of their official capacity, especially those in an oath of office or holding an oath of office, that they cannot bring complaints or accusations towards complaint.
[01:57:34.000 --> 01:57:56.000]  Officer can, he can do that. Prosecutor is the one that cannot. Any other public official can, with the exception of this, anyone in the judge's office can make a complaint unless that court is going to be the one presiding over the trial of that complaint.
[01:57:56.000 --> 01:58:14.000]  Because anyone in that court by agency makes the judge a witness for the state. But any other public official can make a criminal complaint except for a prosecuting attorney. They cannot initiate a complaint at all for any reason.
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:28.000]  Kennedy v. State, in order to avoid the obvious evils of the accumulation of power in one office, for the purpose of filing a criminal complaint, a prosecuting attorney is not a credible person.
[01:58:28.000 --> 01:58:45.000]  That's my story and I'm sticking to it and I'm afraid we're out of time. I thank you all for listening. Thanks. We'll be back Monday with Eddie and Deborah on the traffic show and then Thursday with all of us, hopefully.
[01:58:45.000 --> 01:59:01.000]  And then Eddie and I'll be back next Friday. Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:59:01.000 --> 01:59:19.000]  The Bible's for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:19.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:41.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.