ROL_2012-04-06_16k_Hr1-2.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:06.620] Trash trucks across California are rumbling down city streets using clean fuel made from
[00:06.620 --> 00:12.080] a dirty source, garbage, brilliant innovation or feel good environmental lunacy.
[00:12.080 --> 00:16.160] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with more.
[00:16.160 --> 00:17.760] Privacy is under attack.
[00:17.760 --> 00:21.360] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:21.360 --> 00:26.160] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.160 --> 00:31.120] Don't protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:31.120 --> 00:33.920] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:33.920 --> 00:38.240] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[00:38.240 --> 00:41.760] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[00:41.760 --> 00:45.080] Start over with StartPage.
[00:45.080 --> 00:49.680] Liquefied natural gas or LNG is methane gas turned into a liquid.
[00:49.680 --> 00:54.880] It's a renewable resource that can be produced from landfills like the one in Altamont, California.
[00:54.880 --> 00:59.840] There, the gas from decaying garbage gets sucked into tubes and sent to a facility to
[00:59.840 --> 01:02.880] be converted into liquefied natural gas.
[01:02.880 --> 01:07.680] The 15,000 gallons produced each day are then used to fuel garbage trucks.
[01:07.680 --> 01:12.560] Critics note that liquefying and transporting LNG takes a lot of energy in itself, which
[01:12.560 --> 01:17.320] reduces the overall environmental benefit, though the fuel may still be better than traditional
[01:17.320 --> 01:18.960] fuels like oil or coal.
[01:18.960 --> 01:23.440] But in any case, fueling garbage trucks with garbage is a spiffy idea.
[01:23.440 --> 01:28.200] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:28.200 --> 01:35.120] I'm not a mind reader, but there's a good chance I can guess your password.
[01:35.120 --> 01:40.200] Most people choose passwords from a limited repertoire, so hacking in is a piece of cake.
[01:40.200 --> 01:44.600] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with the solution.
[01:44.600 --> 01:46.200] Privacy is under attack.
[01:46.200 --> 01:49.800] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:49.800 --> 01:54.560] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:54.560 --> 01:59.520] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:59.520 --> 02:02.320] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:02.320 --> 02:06.600] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:06.600 --> 02:10.120] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:10.120 --> 02:13.280] Start over with StartPage.
[02:13.280 --> 02:18.400] It's hard to remember a complicated password, but that's no excuse for a pathetic one.
[02:18.400 --> 02:22.520] Custom security breaches have exposed millions of passwords, so we know what people are
[02:22.520 --> 02:23.520] choosing.
[02:23.520 --> 02:28.960] The most common password is 123456, followed by 12345.
[02:28.960 --> 02:31.480] I love you is also in the top ten.
[02:31.480 --> 02:34.000] If your password is too easy, beef it up.
[02:34.000 --> 02:38.920] It takes just a few seconds to guess a password with seven lowercase letters, but add capital
[02:38.920 --> 02:41.760] letters and numbers and things get much harder.
[02:41.760 --> 02:46.520] Add some other character like a dollar sign and increase the length to ten characters,
[02:46.520 --> 02:51.160] suddenly cracking your password is virtually impossible, and that's good security.
[02:51.160 --> 03:18.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:18.000 --> 03:43.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:43.280 --> 04:09.680] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[04:09.680 --> 04:27.120] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[04:27.120 --> 04:50.720] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[04:50.720 --> 05:17.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[05:17.400 --> 05:47.200] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[05:47.200 --> 06:15.600] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[06:15.600 --> 06:39.200] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[06:39.200 --> 06:56.800] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[06:56.800 --> 07:20.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[07:20.400 --> 07:46.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[07:46.000 --> 07:58.200] I went in and life is starting to get in a long involved story, but the crux of it is
[07:58.200 --> 08:04.880] that I wanted to go in and talk to the lady because she gave me a chance to go in.
[08:04.880 --> 08:12.960] I got a letter saying come in and prior to April the 4th and you won't have to go to
[08:12.960 --> 08:17.240] the court April the 26th, so I thought well then they'll discuss this with me.
[08:17.240 --> 08:23.000] So I go in personally because the order to show cost is I failure to appear, but there
[08:23.000 --> 08:28.280] was never any statement to appear just to fill out the document and go in.
[08:28.280 --> 08:35.000] So I decided that I would go make a physical appearance and so I go in and all I did was
[08:35.000 --> 08:43.880] say that I came to resolve the issue and she says there's only two things you can do.
[08:43.880 --> 08:50.840] Either fill out the application or go to jail or go to court and I says well you know can
[08:50.840 --> 08:55.480] I talk to you about it and you know she says no.
[08:55.480 --> 08:59.680] And I says is there- Okay wait a minute, who was this person?
[08:59.680 --> 09:05.000] It's the recorder.
[09:05.000 --> 09:07.520] Recorder?
[09:07.520 --> 09:16.320] What power or authority did you show it was the recorder and not the court's coordinator?
[09:16.320 --> 09:19.120] I can get her exact title here.
[09:19.120 --> 09:33.320] I think it's- she's the jury recorder.
[09:33.320 --> 09:42.640] And I asked her for the manager, you know somebody above her and so another lady came
[09:42.640 --> 09:53.840] and I handed her a document that explains that Obama is not a valid candidate for president
[09:53.840 --> 10:02.120] and that it was committing treason by giving your allegiance to politics and that's when
[10:02.120 --> 10:03.120] the shit hit the fan.
[10:03.120 --> 10:04.120] Oh sorry.
[10:04.120 --> 10:09.760] Why did you give that to this person?
[10:09.760 --> 10:16.080] Because I felt it was a necessity because she wasn't willing to negotiate with me.
[10:16.080 --> 10:21.000] I mean she was just- it was either do it or leave.
[10:21.000 --> 10:22.160] Okay.
[10:22.160 --> 10:31.040] And you gave her something objecting to Obama and you had-
[10:31.040 --> 10:39.720] I told you the last time that I had moral objections to doing jury duty because I no
[10:39.720 --> 10:44.960] longer was a member- I mean I was given up my citizenship basically.
[10:44.960 --> 10:49.320] And- Did you know- okay I remember we talked about that.
[10:49.320 --> 10:50.320] Right.
[10:50.320 --> 10:58.880] But you see the problem is if you can't give up your citizenship just by saying I give
[10:58.880 --> 11:08.120] up my citizenship, that's a pretty involved process and have you went through that process.
[11:08.120 --> 11:09.120] Not as yet.
[11:09.120 --> 11:17.680] Then you haven't given up your citizenship and therefore have not set aside that duty.
[11:17.680 --> 11:18.680] Okay.
[11:18.680 --> 11:23.560] Well let's say that- I'll take that advice.
[11:23.560 --> 11:31.000] The lady's name- the lady was a deputy clerk for the jury commissioner.
[11:31.000 --> 11:32.520] That's her status.
[11:32.520 --> 11:38.800] And- Wait a minute, a deputy clerk for the grand jury commissioner?
[11:38.800 --> 11:39.800] Correct.
[11:39.800 --> 11:46.960] No, not the grand jury, but the election, it's kind of the election office and then
[11:46.960 --> 12:00.880] it's, I guess, but her actual title is deputy clerk Bingham County jury commissioner.
[12:00.880 --> 12:05.040] That's her official title.
[12:05.040 --> 12:06.960] Bingham County jury commissioner.
[12:06.960 --> 12:15.680] Have you looked at the code for Bingham County to determine precisely what or who this person
[12:15.680 --> 12:18.240] is and what authority she has?
[12:18.240 --> 12:23.800] Well, I- Yeah, if this was an election process, exactly what does a jury commissioner have
[12:23.800 --> 12:27.840] to do with that?
[12:27.840 --> 12:38.800] I don't know, but that's- You need to find out what her specific authority
[12:38.800 --> 12:44.880] and duty is because if she has exercised an authority she doesn't have, well, that's
[12:44.880 --> 12:47.440] a crime in every state.
[12:47.440 --> 12:49.760] Well let me tell you what happened.
[12:49.760 --> 12:55.880] Like I said, she- just because I handed her a piece of paper telling her that Obama was
[12:55.880 --> 13:03.120] not- did not qualify as a constitutional president, at that point she says, I can't-
[13:03.120 --> 13:09.000] I cannot read this and put it down and by that time the police was next to me and I
[13:09.000 --> 13:15.280] said, well, can I get your names and the police said, no, you've got to leave right now.
[13:15.280 --> 13:20.880] They're telling me to tell you to leave right now, so I left immediately when as I was walking
[13:20.880 --> 13:25.800] out the door I said I need to talk to the sheriff and as I was walking out the door
[13:25.800 --> 13:35.640] there was five police or five sheriff people meeting me at the door and one guy was telling
[13:35.640 --> 13:40.720] me that saying that I was making- I was mad or something and I said, no, I'm not mad.
[13:40.720 --> 13:46.600] I was just trying to resolve an issue and I could come April the 4th to resolve this
[13:46.600 --> 13:53.200] and it was April the 3rd and so I had- so there should be no aggravation as to try to
[13:53.200 --> 14:00.200] resolve the issue and then I started handing out this document about Obama not being eligible
[14:00.200 --> 14:06.040] to everyone that was there so I could put them on notice that they were committing
[14:06.040 --> 14:11.080] treason themselves and it got to be quite-
[14:11.080 --> 14:14.800] Well, you certainly know how to win friends and influence people, I'll give you that.
[14:14.800 --> 14:16.040] Well, it's not over yet.
[14:16.040 --> 14:17.040] Okay.
[14:17.040 --> 14:19.280] What did the officers do?
[14:19.280 --> 14:20.280] Okay.
[14:20.280 --> 14:28.440] The officer in the hallway, they calmed down and, well, another detective came so there
[14:28.440 --> 14:35.960] was another guy and he said that we all had to leave the building at that point and so
[14:35.960 --> 14:40.560] only two guys went out and was sitting and talked with me for about 15 minutes and they
[14:40.560 --> 14:42.360] were 100% on my side.
[14:42.360 --> 14:45.480] They understood exactly what I was saying.
[14:45.480 --> 14:50.160] They said, these people are their sheeple.
[14:50.160 --> 14:56.560] They only have one way of thinking and you've disrupted their meal type of thing.
[14:56.560 --> 15:01.760] Well, were any of the people that were agreeing with you, did they carry badges and guns?
[15:01.760 --> 15:02.760] One of them did.
[15:02.760 --> 15:08.560] One was a detective and he was the main guy that was discussing everything with me, the
[15:08.560 --> 15:12.880] detective or the actual guy with the badge, he just sat there and listened but he did
[15:12.880 --> 15:21.200] agree with a lot of what I was saying and then I handed this declaration of independence
[15:21.200 --> 15:27.720] because I am now a sovereign unto the government.
[15:27.720 --> 15:32.560] Let me give you a word of caution.
[15:32.560 --> 15:38.000] I suspect they are not what they purported to be.
[15:38.000 --> 15:43.080] What they did was get you to talk to them, to give them information they could use against
[15:43.080 --> 15:45.080] you if you come back.
[15:45.080 --> 15:46.080] Okay.
[15:46.080 --> 15:49.560] What I did is- Yeah, they placated you as what they did.
[15:49.560 --> 15:54.640] Okay, but I called the police the next day and I told the sheriff, I should say, the
[15:54.640 --> 16:01.120] county sheriff and I told him, I said, I need your help in resolving this issue because
[16:01.120 --> 16:06.720] I have to come back to the courthouse and I want you to follow me around to resolve
[16:06.720 --> 16:09.720] the issue.
[16:09.720 --> 16:10.720] I told him all about it.
[16:10.720 --> 16:17.280] I said, did you get everything that I give these detectives and your employees and he
[16:17.280 --> 16:21.200] said yes, I said okay, do you understand what's going on?
[16:21.200 --> 16:27.800] He said yes and I said, well, I don't know what to do because I'm outside of their jurisdiction.
[16:27.800 --> 16:33.560] Anybody that comes after me, I can get them for treason and he said I understand and I'll
[16:33.560 --> 16:35.680] talk to the judge about it.
[16:35.680 --> 16:41.080] To set you up, I'll explain why when we come back on the other side.
[16:41.080 --> 16:46.160] This is Randy Kelsen, Debbie Stevens, Sadie Craig with Rodeo.
[16:46.160 --> 16:55.960] This is our four hour info marathon, our phones are open, so give us a call, 512-646-1984.
[16:55.960 --> 17:00.960] We'll be right back.
[17:00.960 --> 17:01.960] America is in trouble.
[17:01.960 --> 17:02.960] Washington is a disgrace.
[17:02.960 --> 17:03.960] Government has become too big, it's overtaxing, overspending.
[17:03.960 --> 17:04.960] We need to change direction.
[17:04.960 --> 17:05.960] We really need change.
[17:05.960 --> 17:06.960] We can't afford to make the same mistakes we've made in the past.
[17:06.960 --> 17:07.960] Mitt Romney's reputation as a flip flopper.
[17:07.960 --> 17:08.960] He went the other way.
[17:08.960 --> 17:18.960] When he got paid to go the other way.
[17:18.960 --> 17:20.480] There is need for economic stimulus.
[17:20.480 --> 17:21.480] It's about serial hypocrisy.
[17:21.480 --> 17:22.480] This election is about trust.
[17:22.480 --> 17:27.480] There's been one true consistent candidate and that's Dr. Ron Paul.
[17:27.480 --> 17:30.480] Ron Paul has been so consistent from the very beginning.
[17:30.480 --> 17:32.680] He seems like a more honest candidate.
[17:32.680 --> 17:35.400] He tells the truth about what he believes, whether you like it or not.
[17:35.400 --> 17:37.920] He's never once voted for a tax increase.
[17:37.920 --> 17:40.120] He's never once voted for an unbalanced budget.
[17:40.120 --> 17:43.360] Ron Paul's plan is full to cut his five departments.
[17:43.360 --> 17:44.360] It's what we need.
[17:44.360 --> 17:47.240] When he says he's going to cut a trillion dollars in the first year.
[17:47.240 --> 17:48.240] I believe it.
[17:48.240 --> 17:53.240] If you don't like how things are going, he's tired of politicians, he's something different.
[17:53.240 --> 17:54.240] Ron Paul.
[17:54.240 --> 17:55.240] Ron Paul.
[17:55.240 --> 17:56.240] Ron Paul.
[17:56.240 --> 17:57.240] Ron Paul.
[17:57.240 --> 17:58.240] Ron Paul.
[17:58.240 --> 17:59.240] Ron Paul.
[17:59.240 --> 18:00.240] Ron Paul.
[18:00.240 --> 18:01.240] Ron Paul.
[18:01.240 --> 18:02.240] Ron Paul.
[18:02.240 --> 18:03.240] Ron Paul.
[18:03.240 --> 18:04.240] Ron Paul.
[18:04.240 --> 18:05.240] Ron Paul.
[18:05.240 --> 18:06.240] Ron Paul.
[18:06.240 --> 18:07.240] Ron Paul.
[18:07.240 --> 18:08.240] Ron Paul.
[18:08.240 --> 18:09.240] Ron Paul.
[18:09.240 --> 18:10.240] Ron Paul.
[18:10.240 --> 18:11.240] Ron Paul.
[18:11.240 --> 18:12.240] Ron Paul.
[18:12.240 --> 18:13.240] Ron Paul.
[18:13.240 --> 18:14.240] Ron Paul.
[18:14.240 --> 18:15.240] Ron Paul.
[18:15.240 --> 18:16.240] Ron Paul.
[18:16.240 --> 18:17.240] Ron Paul.
[18:17.240 --> 18:18.240] Ron Paul.
[18:18.240 --> 18:19.240] Ron Paul.
[18:19.240 --> 18:20.240] Ron Paul.
[18:20.240 --> 18:21.240] Ron Paul.
[18:21.240 --> 18:22.240] Ron Paul.
[18:22.240 --> 18:23.240] Ron Paul.
[18:23.240 --> 18:24.240] Ron Paul.
[18:24.240 --> 18:25.240] Ron Paul.
[18:25.240 --> 18:26.240] Ron Paul.
[18:26.240 --> 18:27.240] Ron Paul.
[18:27.240 --> 18:28.240] Ron Paul.
[18:28.240 --> 18:29.240] Ron Paul.
[18:29.240 --> 18:30.240] Ron Paul.
[18:30.240 --> 18:31.240] Ron Paul.
[18:31.240 --> 18:32.240] There's been one true consistent candidate and that's Ron Paul.
[18:32.240 --> 18:33.240] Ron Paul.
[18:33.240 --> 18:34.240] Ron Paul.
[18:34.240 --> 18:35.240] Ron Paul.
[18:35.240 --> 18:36.240] Ron Paul.
[18:36.240 --> 18:39.240] The solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.240 --> 18:41.740] Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.740 --> 18:45.240] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[18:45.240 --> 18:47.240] and click on the blue Michael Miris banner
[18:47.240 --> 18:50.240] or email michaelmiris at yahoo.com.
[18:50.240 --> 18:52.240] That's ruleoflawradio.com
[18:52.240 --> 18:58.240] or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[18:58.240 --> 19:05.240] to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:28.240 --> 19:32.240] Okay, we're back.
[19:32.240 --> 19:35.240] We're talking to Stephanie in Idaho.
[19:35.240 --> 19:39.240] And what you're telling me makes me uncomfortable
[19:39.240 --> 19:47.240] because you told them that you could get them for treason
[19:47.240 --> 19:53.240] and they tended to placate.
[19:53.240 --> 19:56.240] Well, in fact, you can't get them for treason
[19:56.240 --> 19:59.240] and they would have known that.
[19:59.240 --> 20:01.240] At best, sedition.
[20:01.240 --> 20:04.240] And only then, if you could show that they were acting
[20:04.240 --> 20:07.240] to undermine the lawful government,
[20:07.240 --> 20:10.240] treason is armed insurrection against the government
[20:10.240 --> 20:13.240] and you can't show they did that.
[20:13.240 --> 20:17.240] So this makes me think that they're setting you up
[20:17.240 --> 20:22.240] so to get you to give them information to use against you.
[20:22.240 --> 20:28.240] That would be very careful with these guys.
[20:28.240 --> 20:31.240] Oh, let's see.
[20:31.240 --> 20:34.240] We can probably hear you better if I unmute you.
[20:34.240 --> 20:37.240] Okay, go ahead, Stephen.
[20:37.240 --> 20:39.240] Okay.
[20:39.240 --> 20:42.240] The guys that came out and talked to me,
[20:42.240 --> 20:45.240] I never mentioned once that I could get them for treason.
[20:45.240 --> 20:48.240] I was only explaining what the document meant
[20:48.240 --> 20:52.240] that I wanted nothing to do with,
[20:52.240 --> 20:57.240] I was morally objecting to the situation.
[20:57.240 --> 21:01.240] I had no, only the time that I mentioned
[21:01.240 --> 21:03.240] that I could get anybody for treason
[21:03.240 --> 21:05.240] is when I was talking to the sheriff
[21:05.240 --> 21:08.240] and I told him I didn't know how to resolve this
[21:08.240 --> 21:10.240] but I wanted to resolve it.
[21:10.240 --> 21:12.240] I wanted him to help me resolve it
[21:12.240 --> 21:16.240] and I said, I don't know what to do
[21:16.240 --> 21:21.240] but nobody, everybody has a conflict of interest
[21:21.240 --> 21:27.240] coming at me because they are on the wrong side of the law, actually.
[21:27.240 --> 21:29.240] If you understand the Constitution,
[21:29.240 --> 21:32.240] they're on the wrong side trying to pull me into it
[21:32.240 --> 21:34.240] and I said I will not commit treason
[21:34.240 --> 21:36.240] and I will not commit a crime
[21:36.240 --> 21:41.240] and I don't think I ever said that I can get you for treason.
[21:41.240 --> 21:43.240] Okay, good.
[21:43.240 --> 21:48.240] The time all I said was is they have a conflict,
[21:48.240 --> 21:50.240] they have an inherent conflict of interest.
[21:50.240 --> 21:52.240] Anybody that comes after me now
[21:52.240 --> 21:55.240] will have an inherent conflict of interest
[21:55.240 --> 21:59.240] and that's a violation of the due process of law.
[21:59.240 --> 22:00.240] Okay, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[22:00.240 --> 22:03.240] Now, I'm essentially on your side
[22:03.240 --> 22:05.240] but I don't understand how they would have
[22:05.240 --> 22:07.240] an inherent conflict of interest.
[22:07.240 --> 22:10.240] Because they're committing treason and I'm not
[22:10.240 --> 22:12.240] and therefore they want...
[22:12.240 --> 22:15.240] Wait a minute, how do we get there?
[22:15.240 --> 22:20.240] Okay, I am relinquishing my consent to the body politics
[22:20.240 --> 22:26.240] because the government now is 100% illegitimate under Obama.
[22:26.240 --> 22:28.240] Okay, you understand,
[22:28.240 --> 22:31.240] you can't relinquish your citizenship
[22:31.240 --> 22:34.240] just by saying I relinquish my citizenship.
[22:34.240 --> 22:36.240] We'll discuss that later
[22:36.240 --> 22:40.240] but what I'm trying to do is resolve this issue.
[22:40.240 --> 22:43.240] This is where I'm trying to orient you
[22:43.240 --> 22:49.240] into a defensible position.
[22:49.240 --> 22:52.240] You're talking about treason.
[22:52.240 --> 22:54.240] But that's based on their constitution.
[22:54.240 --> 22:57.240] See, visualize me by saying no.
[22:57.240 --> 23:01.240] Wait, define treason.
[23:01.240 --> 23:09.240] Well, all I'm going by is what it says in the code.
[23:09.240 --> 23:13.240] It says anybody that gives aid and comfort to the enemy.
[23:13.240 --> 23:15.240] And so if he usurps the...
[23:15.240 --> 23:19.240] Okay, what does the enemy mean?
[23:19.240 --> 23:26.240] Anybody who usurps the constitution, violates the constitution.
[23:26.240 --> 23:28.240] Where did you get that definition?
[23:28.240 --> 23:30.240] It's so blatant.
[23:30.240 --> 23:34.240] No, no, that's what you decided it means.
[23:34.240 --> 23:35.240] This is law.
[23:35.240 --> 23:37.240] You can't decide what something means.
[23:37.240 --> 23:39.240] You can't have a contract.
[23:39.240 --> 23:42.240] What the standard definition of treason is
[23:42.240 --> 23:47.240] is armed insurrection to overthrow the government.
[23:47.240 --> 23:49.240] That's not what the code says.
[23:49.240 --> 23:50.240] Which code?
[23:50.240 --> 23:52.240] Read it.
[23:52.240 --> 23:53.240] Yeah.
[23:53.240 --> 24:00.240] I'll get it here just a second.
[24:00.240 --> 24:02.240] Okay, why are you getting it?
[24:02.240 --> 24:04.240] I do take this on
[24:04.240 --> 24:07.240] because a lot of people throw around the term treason
[24:07.240 --> 24:15.240] when often the more correct term may well be sedition.
[24:15.240 --> 24:18.240] And if you go after the wrong issue,
[24:18.240 --> 24:21.240] you will be totally discredited.
[24:21.240 --> 24:25.240] So we need to understand the legal definitions of the terms we use
[24:25.240 --> 24:28.240] and not just oppose the legal definitions
[24:28.240 --> 24:33.240] with the common websters or whatever.
[24:33.240 --> 24:37.240] The popular common definition is not the same
[24:37.240 --> 24:40.240] as the legal definition.
[24:40.240 --> 24:42.240] So we need legal definitions here.
[24:42.240 --> 24:44.240] Okay, can I give it to you?
[24:44.240 --> 24:45.240] Yes.
[24:45.240 --> 24:53.240] Okay, 18UFC2318 treason.
[24:53.240 --> 24:55.240] Whoever, common,
[24:55.240 --> 24:57.240] owing allegiance to the United States,
[24:57.240 --> 24:59.240] levies war against them
[24:59.240 --> 25:03.240] or adheres to their enemies,
[25:03.240 --> 25:07.240] gives aid and comfort within the United States
[25:07.240 --> 25:09.240] or elsewhere, is guilty of treason
[25:09.240 --> 25:11.240] and shall suffer death
[25:11.240 --> 25:15.240] or shall be imprisoned not less than five years
[25:15.240 --> 25:20.240] or fined under this title for $10,000
[25:20.240 --> 25:21.240] and shall...
[25:21.240 --> 25:23.240] Okay, that's basically it.
[25:23.240 --> 25:29.240] What is an enemy of the United States defined?
[25:29.240 --> 25:33.240] Well, somebody who takes over the control...
[25:33.240 --> 25:35.240] No, not what is your definition.
[25:35.240 --> 25:40.240] Where is it defined in the statute you're reading?
[25:40.240 --> 25:42.240] Well, it's only obvious if somebody...
[25:42.240 --> 25:44.240] No, it's not only obvious.
[25:44.240 --> 25:46.240] You're talking about federal statute.
[25:46.240 --> 25:47.240] It's not obvious.
[25:47.240 --> 25:50.240] Yeah, this is a really important concept.
[25:50.240 --> 25:54.240] If we're to be consistent and effective,
[25:54.240 --> 25:58.240] is nothing in law is obvious.
[25:58.240 --> 26:02.240] It can never assume something is a certain way.
[26:02.240 --> 26:04.240] This is one thing we keep saying,
[26:04.240 --> 26:07.240] is you can never make a proactive statement of law
[26:07.240 --> 26:09.240] out of your own mouth.
[26:09.240 --> 26:13.240] You must make it out of the mouth of the court.
[26:13.240 --> 26:19.240] So where has the court defined an enemy of the state?
[26:19.240 --> 26:22.240] And we have to go by that definition.
[26:22.240 --> 26:26.240] As I understand it, the Constitution is the contract.
[26:26.240 --> 26:29.240] And if somebody violates the contract...
[26:29.240 --> 26:30.240] It's not a contract.
[26:30.240 --> 26:33.240] At best, it's a compact.
[26:33.240 --> 26:36.240] But it has nothing to do with you and me.
[26:36.240 --> 26:40.240] It's not a compact between you and me and the federal government.
[26:40.240 --> 26:44.240] It's a compact between the individual states
[26:44.240 --> 26:47.240] and the federal government.
[26:47.240 --> 26:51.240] We've created the body politic,
[26:51.240 --> 26:54.240] but the body politic is who is compacted
[26:54.240 --> 26:58.240] with the federal government, not we, the individual people.
[26:58.240 --> 27:03.240] The federal Constitution doesn't have a dang thing to do with us,
[27:03.240 --> 27:09.240] except in areas where the federal government is acting.
[27:09.240 --> 27:15.240] That's why every state has a separate Constitution of its own.
[27:15.240 --> 27:19.240] That is what goes to the people of the individual state.
[27:19.240 --> 27:22.240] The federal Constitution simply says,
[27:22.240 --> 27:24.240] here are the federal powers.
[27:24.240 --> 27:26.240] That's all.
[27:26.240 --> 27:28.240] And the states are responsible for ensuring
[27:28.240 --> 27:33.240] that the federal government remains within those powers.
[27:33.240 --> 27:35.240] If it's not a contract,
[27:35.240 --> 27:42.240] then there's no binding jurisdiction over me then.
[27:42.240 --> 27:45.240] We don't have any binding jurisdiction over you
[27:45.240 --> 27:47.240] that you don't give them.
[27:47.240 --> 27:50.240] There's not a single enumerated power
[27:50.240 --> 27:52.240] given to the federal government
[27:52.240 --> 27:56.240] over the individual people of any of the several states.
[27:56.240 --> 27:58.240] Where they get their power from
[27:58.240 --> 28:01.240] is the acquiescence of the state government
[28:01.240 --> 28:05.240] to enforce federal law for them.
[28:05.240 --> 28:11.240] So the state implements a state version of the law.
[28:11.240 --> 28:15.240] And there is where they get the jurisdiction.
[28:15.240 --> 28:17.240] If I'm outside the body politic,
[28:17.240 --> 28:20.240] then they have no jurisdiction over me.
[28:20.240 --> 28:24.240] How do you get outside the body politic?
[28:24.240 --> 28:27.240] By your consent only.
[28:27.240 --> 28:29.240] That's a non-answer.
[28:29.240 --> 28:30.240] By your consent only.
[28:30.240 --> 28:32.240] What does that mean?
[28:32.240 --> 28:37.240] Well, if I was in England,
[28:37.240 --> 28:42.240] am I consenting to the United States body politic?
[28:42.240 --> 28:43.240] No.
[28:43.240 --> 28:44.240] I don't know.
[28:44.240 --> 28:46.240] It wouldn't be.
[28:46.240 --> 28:49.240] You apparently have meanings for these terms
[28:49.240 --> 28:53.240] that I don't understand.
[28:53.240 --> 28:56.240] Well, okay.
[28:56.240 --> 28:58.240] Like I was trying to explain before,
[28:58.240 --> 29:00.240] there's reality.
[29:00.240 --> 29:03.240] There's two states being true and false,
[29:03.240 --> 29:06.240] and reality is the state of being true.
[29:06.240 --> 29:07.240] Wait a minute.
[29:07.240 --> 29:08.240] Wait a minute.
[29:08.240 --> 29:09.240] Who says?
[29:09.240 --> 29:13.240] Well, the only way that you could defy that
[29:13.240 --> 29:15.240] is by bouncing off the wall and saying,
[29:15.240 --> 29:16.240] you can walk through a wall.
[29:16.240 --> 29:17.240] No.
[29:17.240 --> 29:18.240] Okay.
[29:18.240 --> 29:19.240] We're not being facetious.
[29:19.240 --> 29:20.240] Honestly, I'm not being facetious.
[29:20.240 --> 29:21.240] I understand.
[29:21.240 --> 29:23.240] We're dealing in law here.
[29:23.240 --> 29:24.240] Well, yes.
[29:24.240 --> 29:25.240] Law.
[29:25.240 --> 29:28.240] And we have to deal in legal definitions.
[29:28.240 --> 29:31.240] We can't bring in our own personal definitions
[29:31.240 --> 29:33.240] because your definition is going to be different
[29:33.240 --> 29:34.240] to mine.
[29:34.240 --> 29:35.240] It's going to be different to Eddie's.
[29:35.240 --> 29:42.240] It's going to get really complex in order to have some focus.
[29:42.240 --> 29:45.240] We have to have a consistent set of definitions.
[29:45.240 --> 29:46.240] Okay.
[29:46.240 --> 29:47.240] Hang on.
[29:47.240 --> 29:48.240] We'll be right back.
[29:48.240 --> 29:49.240] This is Randy Kelton.
[29:49.240 --> 29:50.240] David Stevens.
[29:50.240 --> 29:51.240] Eddie Craig.
[29:51.240 --> 29:52.240] We have low radio.
[29:52.240 --> 29:53.240] A call-in number.
[29:53.240 --> 29:54.240] 512-646-1984.
[29:54.240 --> 30:00.240] We'll be right back on the other side.
[30:00.240 --> 30:03.240] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper
[30:03.240 --> 30:05.240] that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[30:05.240 --> 30:07.240] The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:07.240 --> 30:11.240] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[30:11.240 --> 30:12.240] it was a controlled demolition.
[30:12.240 --> 30:14.240] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members
[30:14.240 --> 30:15.240] have given their lives.
[30:15.240 --> 30:17.240] And thousands of my fellow force
[30:17.240 --> 30:18.240] responded to dying.
[30:18.240 --> 30:19.240] I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:19.240 --> 30:20.240] I'm a structural engineer.
[30:20.240 --> 30:21.240] I'm a New York City correctional.
[30:21.240 --> 30:22.240] I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:22.240 --> 30:24.240] I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:24.240 --> 30:25.240] We're Americans.
[30:25.240 --> 30:27.240] And we deserve the truth.
[30:27.240 --> 30:30.240] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:30.240 --> 30:35.240] HempUSA.org has a revolutionary wonder food
[30:35.240 --> 30:38.240] for detoxing the body and rebuilding the immune system.
[30:38.240 --> 30:41.240] Micro-plant powder can help unclog arteries
[30:41.240 --> 30:44.240] and soften heart valves while removing heavy metals,
[30:44.240 --> 30:47.240] virus, fungus, bacteria, and parasites.
[30:47.240 --> 30:49.240] Plus, it cleans and purifies the blood,
[30:49.240 --> 30:51.240] lungs, stomach, and colon.
[30:51.240 --> 30:54.240] Keep your body clean with micro-plant powder.
[30:54.240 --> 30:56.240] Visit us at HempUSA.org
[30:56.240 --> 31:00.240] or call 908-69-12608 today.
[31:02.240 --> 31:03.240] Attention, listeners.
[31:03.240 --> 31:04.240] Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books,
[31:04.240 --> 31:06.240] here with a special announcement
[31:06.240 --> 31:08.240] according to the Southern Poverty Law Center's
[31:08.240 --> 31:10.240] new report titled The Year in Hate and Extremism.
[31:10.240 --> 31:11.240] In the past three years,
[31:11.240 --> 31:15.240] the number of Patriot groups has grown by 755%.
[31:15.240 --> 31:18.240] Once again, making the list, Brave New Books.
[31:18.240 --> 31:20.240] Also, congratulations to Austin's own
[31:20.240 --> 31:22.240] ruleoflawradio.com for joining the ranks
[31:22.240 --> 31:24.240] of the SBLC's favorite Patriots.
[31:24.240 --> 31:26.240] And shout out to Debra Medina's lead Texans
[31:26.240 --> 31:28.240] for making the list as well.
[31:28.240 --> 31:30.240] In order to show our appreciation for helping
[31:30.240 --> 31:31.240] keep the bookstore on the front lines
[31:31.240 --> 31:32.240] of the Battle for Liberty,
[31:32.240 --> 31:34.240] for the whole month of April,
[31:34.240 --> 31:36.240] mention this ad, and we'll take 5% off
[31:36.240 --> 31:38.240] everything in the store.
[31:38.240 --> 31:40.240] That's right, you can get 5% off the latest
[31:40.240 --> 31:42.240] in extremist materials.
[31:42.240 --> 31:44.240] Get your Ron Paul Yard signed or church,
[31:44.240 --> 31:46.240] one of the last copies of the Oklahoma City
[31:46.240 --> 31:48.240] bombing's final report,
[31:48.240 --> 31:49.240] where Charlotte Isserby has delivered
[31:49.240 --> 31:51.240] a dumbing down of America.
[31:51.240 --> 31:53.240] So come on down and help further the rise
[31:53.240 --> 31:55.240] of the Patriot movement.
[31:55.240 --> 31:57.240] The bookstore is located at 1904
[31:57.240 --> 31:59.240] Guadalupe Street. 5% discount
[31:59.240 --> 32:01.240] excludes precious metal sales.
[32:05.240 --> 32:07.240] Yeah, I got the warrant.
[32:07.240 --> 32:09.240] And I'm gonna solve them.
[32:11.240 --> 32:13.240] To the government then.
[32:13.240 --> 32:15.240] Prosecute them.
[32:15.240 --> 32:17.240] Okay.
[32:18.240 --> 32:20.240] Alright folks, we're back.
[32:20.240 --> 32:22.240] Randy, you wanna take us back
[32:22.240 --> 32:24.240] to the word here?
[32:24.240 --> 32:26.240] Yeah, Stephen, it's not that I'm trying
[32:26.240 --> 32:28.240] to be difficult.
[32:28.240 --> 32:30.240] What I'm trying to do
[32:30.240 --> 32:32.240] is demonstrate
[32:32.240 --> 32:34.240] a mental discipline.
[32:34.240 --> 32:36.240] When we're in
[32:36.240 --> 32:38.240] normal conversation,
[32:38.240 --> 32:40.240] we can talk in generalities.
[32:42.240 --> 32:44.240] But we need to understand
[32:44.240 --> 32:46.240] that very often we can
[32:46.240 --> 32:48.240] talk in these kinds of general
[32:48.240 --> 32:50.240] terms.
[32:50.240 --> 32:52.240] And one of us use a term
[32:52.240 --> 32:54.240] that we have a meaning for.
[32:54.240 --> 32:56.240] And the other person
[32:56.240 --> 32:58.240] hear that term and have a different
[32:58.240 --> 33:00.240] meaning for.
[33:00.240 --> 33:02.240] And we can talk back and forth,
[33:02.240 --> 33:04.240] and we will
[33:04.240 --> 33:06.240] feel like we are
[33:06.240 --> 33:08.240] agreeing with one another
[33:08.240 --> 33:10.240] when we could be diametrically
[33:10.240 --> 33:12.240] opposed.
[33:12.240 --> 33:14.240] And when we're talking about matters
[33:14.240 --> 33:16.240] as serious as this one,
[33:16.240 --> 33:18.240] where we're challenging
[33:18.240 --> 33:20.240] guys with loaded pistols,
[33:20.240 --> 33:22.240] we need
[33:22.240 --> 33:24.240] to make sure we have all of our
[33:24.240 --> 33:26.240] definitions right.
[33:26.240 --> 33:28.240] We need to fully understand
[33:28.240 --> 33:30.240] our legal position.
[33:30.240 --> 33:32.240] Does that make sense?
[33:32.240 --> 33:34.240] Yes.
[33:34.240 --> 33:36.240] Can I explain myself?
[33:36.240 --> 33:38.240] Yes.
[33:38.240 --> 33:40.240] Okay.
[33:40.240 --> 33:42.240] The laws of nature are the only laws
[33:42.240 --> 33:44.240] that exist.
[33:44.240 --> 33:46.240] Proactive statement.
[33:46.240 --> 33:48.240] Where did you come up with that?
[33:48.240 --> 33:50.240] Reality.
[33:50.240 --> 33:52.240] Okay.
[33:52.240 --> 33:54.240] We're not dealing
[33:54.240 --> 33:56.240] with the laws of nature. I'm an engineer
[33:56.240 --> 33:58.240] and I'm very familiar with
[33:58.240 --> 34:00.240] the laws of nature.
[34:00.240 --> 34:02.240] But we're not in
[34:02.240 --> 34:04.240] that context now. Now we're in
[34:04.240 --> 34:06.240] context of law.
[34:06.240 --> 34:08.240] Of the body politic.
[34:08.240 --> 34:10.240] The law is
[34:10.240 --> 34:12.240] what you're calling law is in the
[34:12.240 --> 34:14.240] constitution, the body politic.
[34:14.240 --> 34:16.240] The laws of nature
[34:16.240 --> 34:18.240] supersede
[34:18.240 --> 34:20.240] any mutual understanding.
[34:20.240 --> 34:22.240] Reality exists.
[34:22.240 --> 34:24.240] Wait a minute. Where does
[34:24.240 --> 34:26.240] the law of nature
[34:26.240 --> 34:28.240] supersede the statutory law?
[34:28.240 --> 34:30.240] Because it's reality.
[34:30.240 --> 34:32.240] Okay, wait a minute.
[34:32.240 --> 34:34.240] Let's give some phraseology here. First off,
[34:34.240 --> 34:36.240] reality is whatever
[34:36.240 --> 34:38.240] an individual perceives it is, right
[34:38.240 --> 34:40.240] or wrong.
[34:40.240 --> 34:42.240] Reality is going to be relative
[34:42.240 --> 34:44.240] to some over others.
[34:44.240 --> 34:46.240] In this case, what we're talking about
[34:46.240 --> 34:48.240] is man-made versus natural.
[34:48.240 --> 34:50.240] Not reality versus anything
[34:50.240 --> 34:52.240] else. Man-made versus
[34:52.240 --> 34:54.240] natural.
[34:54.240 --> 34:56.240] Can you walk through a wall?
[34:56.240 --> 34:58.240] Can I walk through a wall? Depends entirely
[34:58.240 --> 35:00.240] on what the wall is made out of.
[35:00.240 --> 35:02.240] So until you give me
[35:02.240 --> 35:04.240] a better question about what kind
[35:04.240 --> 35:06.240] of wall, then that's the answer I'm
[35:06.240 --> 35:08.240] giving you. Yes, I can.
[35:08.240 --> 35:10.240] You can walk through a brick wall.
[35:10.240 --> 35:12.240] You didn't define it as a brick wall.
[35:12.240 --> 35:14.240] You defined it as a wall.
[35:14.240 --> 35:16.240] How that
[35:16.240 --> 35:18.240] wall is built is
[35:18.240 --> 35:20.240] determined there, right? The wall
[35:20.240 --> 35:22.240] is a barrier that you can't get through.
[35:22.240 --> 35:24.240] Okay.
[35:24.240 --> 35:26.240] What does that have to do
[35:26.240 --> 35:28.240] with the legal position
[35:28.240 --> 35:30.240] that you're taking? Okay.
[35:30.240 --> 35:32.240] The government establishes
[35:32.240 --> 35:34.240] the color
[35:34.240 --> 35:36.240] of law, which everything
[35:36.240 --> 35:38.240] that you are talking about falls
[35:38.240 --> 35:40.240] to the belief. The rules of
[35:40.240 --> 35:42.240] law, which is reality.
[35:42.240 --> 35:44.240] Now wait a minute.
[35:44.240 --> 35:46.240] Here's where I have a problem.
[35:46.240 --> 35:48.240] If I accept that
[35:48.240 --> 35:50.240] presupposition
[35:50.240 --> 35:52.240] without evidence
[35:52.240 --> 35:54.240] to support it,
[35:54.240 --> 35:56.240] then I've just stepped off into
[35:56.240 --> 35:58.240] Never Never Land.
[35:58.240 --> 36:00.240] Well, how can you support
[36:00.240 --> 36:02.240] that you have jurisdiction over
[36:02.240 --> 36:04.240] me? Are you God?
[36:04.240 --> 36:06.240] See, now you've
[36:06.240 --> 36:08.240] taken this to a whole different position.
[36:08.240 --> 36:10.240] I never said I had jurisdiction over you
[36:10.240 --> 36:12.240] and you presumed I have
[36:12.240 --> 36:14.240] jurisdiction over you. What does that have to do
[36:14.240 --> 36:16.240] with the statutory law?
[36:16.240 --> 36:18.240] Reality is the ultimate authority
[36:18.240 --> 36:20.240] in the final arbiter.
[36:20.240 --> 36:22.240] Who said that?
[36:22.240 --> 36:24.240] Where did that come from? Well,
[36:24.240 --> 36:26.240] can you define?
[36:26.240 --> 36:28.240] Reality establishes what you can and cannot do.
[36:28.240 --> 36:30.240] Is that true or false?
[36:30.240 --> 36:32.240] It does in science,
[36:32.240 --> 36:34.240] but not in law.
[36:34.240 --> 36:36.240] You can't walk through a wall
[36:36.240 --> 36:38.240] and neither can I.
[36:38.240 --> 36:40.240] That's science. That's not law.
[36:40.240 --> 36:42.240] No, that's reality.
[36:42.240 --> 36:44.240] And reality dictates the laws of nature.
[36:44.240 --> 36:46.240] What we're doing here
[36:46.240 --> 36:48.240] is you're trying to take
[36:48.240 --> 36:50.240] your ideas
[36:50.240 --> 36:52.240] and your beliefs
[36:52.240 --> 36:54.240] and superimpose them on me
[36:54.240 --> 36:56.240] and Eddie and all of our listeners.
[36:56.240 --> 36:58.240] Not at all.
[36:58.240 --> 37:00.240] You have a meaning for reality.
[37:00.240 --> 37:02.240] What is that?
[37:02.240 --> 37:04.240] So I can't.
[37:04.240 --> 37:06.240] You can't say I'm imposing anything on you
[37:06.240 --> 37:08.240] because I didn't establish it.
[37:08.240 --> 37:10.240] You're trying to impose your laws
[37:10.240 --> 37:12.240] because you established
[37:12.240 --> 37:14.240] man-made constitution
[37:14.240 --> 37:16.240] established the color of law.
[37:16.240 --> 37:18.240] That's imposed.
[37:18.240 --> 37:20.240] That's imposing somebody else's reality on you.
[37:20.240 --> 37:22.240] I can't impose...
[37:22.240 --> 37:24.240] Understand. This is what we do.
[37:24.240 --> 37:26.240] We're here to talk about law.
[37:26.240 --> 37:28.240] We deal with law and we're talking about
[37:28.240 --> 37:30.240] legal issues.
[37:30.240 --> 37:32.240] Not esoteric
[37:32.240 --> 37:34.240] the real law.
[37:34.240 --> 37:36.240] I'm talking about the statutory code
[37:36.240 --> 37:38.240] in your case
[37:38.240 --> 37:40.240] for Idaho.
[37:40.240 --> 37:42.240] Idaho has...
[37:42.240 --> 37:44.240] The courts do not enforce
[37:44.240 --> 37:46.240] the laws of nature.
[37:46.240 --> 37:48.240] They enforce the laws of the
[37:48.240 --> 37:50.240] legislature otherwise known
[37:50.240 --> 37:52.240] as the laws of man.
[37:52.240 --> 37:54.240] They don't enforce
[37:54.240 --> 37:56.240] nature's laws.
[37:56.240 --> 37:58.240] That's a whole other realm of authority.
[37:58.240 --> 38:00.240] I'll agree with you on that.
[38:00.240 --> 38:02.240] Jurisdiction.
[38:02.240 --> 38:04.240] First have to be in their jurisdiction.
[38:04.240 --> 38:06.240] Yeah, right.
[38:06.240 --> 38:08.240] Exactly. If you are within
[38:08.240 --> 38:10.240] the territorial boundaries
[38:10.240 --> 38:12.240] of the state of Idaho
[38:12.240 --> 38:14.240] then
[38:14.240 --> 38:16.240] you are presumed to be
[38:16.240 --> 38:18.240] within the jurisdiction.
[38:18.240 --> 38:20.240] Now
[38:20.240 --> 38:22.240] in order to be outside
[38:22.240 --> 38:24.240] the jurisdiction
[38:24.240 --> 38:26.240] you would have to establish
[38:26.240 --> 38:28.240] your position of being outside
[38:28.240 --> 38:30.240] the jurisdiction
[38:30.240 --> 38:32.240] by the statutory law
[38:32.240 --> 38:34.240] and not by
[38:34.240 --> 38:36.240] nature's law or God's law
[38:36.240 --> 38:38.240] or any other law.
[38:38.240 --> 38:40.240] We're dealing
[38:40.240 --> 38:42.240] in statutory law here
[38:42.240 --> 38:44.240] and we can't just oppose another law
[38:44.240 --> 38:46.240] on that.
[38:46.240 --> 38:48.240] Even if... I'm not saying you're not right.
[38:48.240 --> 38:50.240] I'm not imposing any laws.
[38:50.240 --> 38:52.240] See, if
[38:52.240 --> 38:54.240] geographic jurisdiction
[38:54.240 --> 38:56.240] exists, that means there's
[38:56.240 --> 38:58.240] 24-7 jurisdiction over somebody.
[38:58.240 --> 39:00.240] That's slavery
[39:00.240 --> 39:02.240] and so you cannot have
[39:02.240 --> 39:04.240] geographic jurisdiction.
[39:04.240 --> 39:06.240] Wait a minute, hold on.
[39:06.240 --> 39:08.240] Such a matter of jurisdiction, violating somebody
[39:08.240 --> 39:10.240] else's rights or...
[39:10.240 --> 39:12.240] Wait a minute, hold on, hold on.
[39:12.240 --> 39:14.240] Jurisdiction
[39:14.240 --> 39:16.240] does not
[39:16.240 --> 39:18.240] mean
[39:18.240 --> 39:20.240] forced labor or involuntary servitude.
[39:20.240 --> 39:22.240] I
[39:22.240 --> 39:24.240] keep making these generalities
[39:24.240 --> 39:26.240] and I don't know how you get there.
[39:26.240 --> 39:28.240] Well, because slavery
[39:28.240 --> 39:30.240] is having dominion over somebody 24-7
[39:30.240 --> 39:32.240] and that's...
[39:32.240 --> 39:34.240] No, it isn't.
[39:34.240 --> 39:36.240] Yes, it is. See?
[39:36.240 --> 39:38.240] Okay, well see, here's the problem.
[39:38.240 --> 39:40.240] Slavery is forced servitude.
[39:40.240 --> 39:42.240] Well...
[39:42.240 --> 39:44.240] If I have dominion over you
[39:44.240 --> 39:46.240] and I don't enforce that dominion
[39:46.240 --> 39:48.240] you're not subject to slavery.
[39:48.240 --> 39:50.240] You're not subject to slavery.
[39:50.240 --> 39:52.240] Can I object for a second?
[39:52.240 --> 39:54.240] Yeah, let's back up here
[39:54.240 --> 39:56.240] on this 24-hour
[39:56.240 --> 39:58.240] jurisdiction argument first.
[39:58.240 --> 40:00.240] Then we'll get to the slavery
[40:00.240 --> 40:02.240] side of this.
[40:02.240 --> 40:04.240] If you're breaking into my house, do I
[40:04.240 --> 40:06.240] have the jurisdiction to stop
[40:06.240 --> 40:08.240] you?
[40:08.240 --> 40:10.240] Subject matter jurisdiction.
[40:10.240 --> 40:12.240] Okay, stop trying to split
[40:12.240 --> 40:14.240] hairs that don't exist.
[40:14.240 --> 40:16.240] If you're breaking into my house, do I
[40:16.240 --> 40:18.240] have the jurisdiction to stop you?
[40:18.240 --> 40:20.240] Yes.
[40:20.240 --> 40:22.240] It's a yes or no answer.
[40:22.240 --> 40:24.240] Because it's your property
[40:24.240 --> 40:26.240] within your domain.
[40:26.240 --> 40:28.240] Now, when you're breaking into your own house
[40:28.240 --> 40:30.240] and I live in a different place
[40:30.240 --> 40:32.240] do I have the jurisdiction to interfere
[40:32.240 --> 40:34.240] with you breaking into your own house?
[40:34.240 --> 40:36.240] No.
[40:36.240 --> 40:38.240] No, and I'm not trying to
[40:38.240 --> 40:40.240] enforce you breaking into your own house.
[40:40.240 --> 40:42.240] Right.
[40:42.240 --> 40:44.240] Okay, so to argue that my jurisdiction
[40:44.240 --> 40:46.240] because I have it at a particular
[40:46.240 --> 40:48.240] place in time
[40:48.240 --> 40:50.240] that's an erroneous argument.
[40:50.240 --> 40:52.240] Doesn't happen. The same thing applies
[40:52.240 --> 40:54.240] to the courts. Their jurisdiction
[40:54.240 --> 40:56.240] is not 24-7.
[40:56.240 --> 40:58.240] It's only when something is occurring
[40:58.240 --> 41:00.240] that falls within
[41:00.240 --> 41:02.240] their power to act on.
[41:02.240 --> 41:04.240] Exactly.
[41:04.240 --> 41:06.240] Okay, we need to stop here because
[41:06.240 --> 41:08.240] with this kind
[41:08.240 --> 41:10.240] of argument
[41:10.240 --> 41:12.240] where we have no basis
[41:12.240 --> 41:14.240] to structure the argument on
[41:14.240 --> 41:16.240] we can't
[41:16.240 --> 41:18.240] come to a meeting of minds
[41:18.240 --> 41:20.240] because
[41:20.240 --> 41:22.240] you have
[41:22.240 --> 41:24.240] ideas and beliefs about
[41:24.240 --> 41:26.240] how things are
[41:26.240 --> 41:28.240] and any and our more
[41:28.240 --> 41:30.240] technicians.
[41:30.240 --> 41:32.240] We have our beliefs. I have
[41:32.240 --> 41:34.240] my opinions
[41:34.240 --> 41:36.240] and positions
[41:36.240 --> 41:38.240] but when I talk about law
[41:38.240 --> 41:40.240] I don't get to superimpose my
[41:40.240 --> 41:42.240] opinions and positions
[41:42.240 --> 41:44.240] on what the law says.
[41:44.240 --> 41:46.240] When people call me in
[41:46.240 --> 41:48.240] and ask me for my opinions
[41:48.240 --> 41:50.240] I'm not giving
[41:50.240 --> 41:52.240] my personal opinions. If I give my personal
[41:52.240 --> 41:54.240] opinion I'll make it really
[41:54.240 --> 41:56.240] clear this is my personal
[41:56.240 --> 41:58.240] opinion. But if they ask me
[41:58.240 --> 42:00.240] something about law I'm going to restrict
[42:00.240 --> 42:02.240] myself
[42:02.240 --> 42:04.240] to the limits
[42:04.240 --> 42:06.240] of my knowledge of what
[42:06.240 --> 42:08.240] the law actually says
[42:08.240 --> 42:10.240] and you'll hear me and any both
[42:10.240 --> 42:12.240] will be asked a question
[42:12.240 --> 42:14.240] and we'll say we don't know how to answer
[42:14.240 --> 42:16.240] that. Now we could always
[42:16.240 --> 42:18.240] come up with an opinion about it
[42:18.240 --> 42:20.240] but we're saying
[42:20.240 --> 42:22.240] we don't know the law governing that
[42:22.240 --> 42:24.240] issue so we can't speak to it
[42:24.240 --> 42:26.240] and that's what we're asking
[42:26.240 --> 42:28.240] you to do is speak to the law
[42:28.240 --> 42:30.240] on these issues
[42:30.240 --> 42:32.240] and not opinions on these
[42:32.240 --> 42:34.240] issues. I hope that makes
[42:34.240 --> 42:36.240] sense. I understand
[42:36.240 --> 42:38.240] exactly what you're saying. You're saying
[42:38.240 --> 42:40.240] in the code once you're in the body politic
[42:40.240 --> 42:42.240] then there's a whole
[42:42.240 --> 42:44.240] mess of rat maze
[42:44.240 --> 42:46.240] that you have to go through to
[42:46.240 --> 42:48.240] get any light of day.
[42:48.240 --> 42:50.240] What I'm telling you is
[42:50.240 --> 42:52.240] if you're outside the body politic
[42:52.240 --> 42:54.240] they don't have jurisdiction
[42:54.240 --> 42:56.240] over you unless you violate
[42:56.240 --> 42:58.240] another person's individual
[42:58.240 --> 43:00.240] rights which is subject matter
[43:00.240 --> 43:02.240] jurisdiction. And that's where we
[43:02.240 --> 43:04.240] started is with
[43:04.240 --> 43:06.240] whether you were inside
[43:06.240 --> 43:08.240] or outside the body politic.
[43:08.240 --> 43:10.240] Right. And persona jurisdiction
[43:10.240 --> 43:12.240] is giving your consent.
[43:12.240 --> 43:14.240] If you give your allegiance to the United
[43:14.240 --> 43:16.240] States then they have you
[43:16.240 --> 43:18.240] under their jurisdiction.
[43:18.240 --> 43:20.240] It's religion.
[43:20.240 --> 43:22.240] Think of government just another way.
[43:22.240 --> 43:24.240] There is more to
[43:24.240 --> 43:26.240] impersonal jurisdiction than giving your
[43:26.240 --> 43:28.240] allegiance
[43:28.240 --> 43:30.240] than your
[43:30.240 --> 43:34.240] voluntary acceptance.
[43:34.240 --> 43:36.240] We really have used a lot of time
[43:36.240 --> 43:38.240] on this and I don't think we're
[43:38.240 --> 43:40.240] going to come to a meeting of minds.
[43:40.240 --> 43:42.240] So I would like
[43:42.240 --> 43:44.240] to kind of call this off. We've got to
[43:44.240 --> 43:46.240] call this kind of picking up.
[43:46.240 --> 43:48.240] I appreciate
[43:48.240 --> 43:50.240] your position
[43:50.240 --> 43:52.240] but I don't think we're going to come to
[43:52.240 --> 43:54.240] an agreement.
[43:54.240 --> 43:56.240] Yeah. But thanks for calling
[43:56.240 --> 43:58.240] and I don't mean to push you off but we
[43:58.240 --> 44:00.240] will be right back.
[44:28.240 --> 44:30.240] Thank you.
[44:58.240 --> 45:00.240] Thank you.
[45:28.240 --> 45:30.240] Thank you.
[45:58.240 --> 46:00.240] 866
[46:00.240 --> 46:28.240] Easy.
[46:28.240 --> 46:30.240] Hi folks. We are back.
[46:30.240 --> 46:32.240] This is rule of law radio.
[46:32.240 --> 46:34.240] This is our Friday night for our info marathon.
[46:34.240 --> 46:36.240] We're just getting rolling
[46:36.240 --> 46:38.240] on the show. We're about 45 minutes in.
[46:38.240 --> 46:40.240] Alright.
[46:40.240 --> 46:42.240] We have callers up on the board and right now
[46:42.240 --> 46:44.240] we're going to go to Barrett in Idaho.
[46:44.240 --> 46:46.240] Barrett, what can we do for you?
[46:46.240 --> 46:48.240] Hi.
[46:48.240 --> 46:50.240] I've had a problem since
[46:50.240 --> 46:52.240] 09 March.
[46:52.240 --> 46:54.240] They revoked my license.
[46:54.240 --> 46:56.240] Can you all hear me good?
[46:56.240 --> 46:58.240] They being who?
[46:58.240 --> 47:00.240] Uh...
[47:00.240 --> 47:02.240] The sheriff
[47:02.240 --> 47:04.240] can't revoke your license.
[47:04.240 --> 47:06.240] What state
[47:06.240 --> 47:08.240] revoked your license?
[47:08.240 --> 47:10.240] What I want to get
[47:10.240 --> 47:12.240] to what I really want to touch on
[47:12.240 --> 47:14.240] is I left that state.
[47:14.240 --> 47:16.240] I'm in a totally other state
[47:16.240 --> 47:18.240] Idaho.
[47:18.240 --> 47:20.240] I like here either because it's like a police
[47:20.240 --> 47:22.240] state here too.
[47:22.240 --> 47:24.240] I just want to be able to have my
[47:24.240 --> 47:26.240] rights and my freedom
[47:26.240 --> 47:28.240] and, you know,
[47:28.240 --> 47:30.240] and I want to be able to drive so I can go to work
[47:30.240 --> 47:32.240] instead of being on the dole
[47:32.240 --> 47:34.240] because there's all the strings attached
[47:34.240 --> 47:36.240] when you're dealing with government.
[47:36.240 --> 47:38.240] Uh...
[47:38.240 --> 47:40.240] So if I go to another state and I have insurance
[47:40.240 --> 47:42.240] which I always like to have
[47:42.240 --> 47:44.240] because there's always some dumb ass
[47:44.240 --> 47:46.240] when you're on a motorcycle
[47:46.240 --> 47:48.240] I have a red light. I've been hit twice
[47:48.240 --> 47:50.240] in 11 years
[47:50.240 --> 47:52.240] at red lights where I was talking
[47:52.240 --> 47:54.240] about a car or something hit me.
[47:54.240 --> 47:56.240] Sorry, I'll get...
[47:56.240 --> 47:58.240] Yeah.
[47:58.240 --> 48:00.240] So say, okay, I am
[48:00.240 --> 48:02.240] revoked in Oregon
[48:02.240 --> 48:04.240] but would they just really
[48:04.240 --> 48:06.240] handle me anywhere else
[48:06.240 --> 48:08.240] even though I wasn't in
[48:08.240 --> 48:10.240] transport and I wouldn't be in
[48:10.240 --> 48:12.240] transport at a time if I ever got pulled over
[48:12.240 --> 48:14.240] for anything?
[48:14.240 --> 48:16.240] Do you understand?
[48:16.240 --> 48:18.240] Not exactly.
[48:18.240 --> 48:20.240] Are you wanting to know if there's some sort of
[48:20.240 --> 48:22.240] problem with getting a license in Idaho
[48:22.240 --> 48:24.240] versus having it taken away
[48:24.240 --> 48:26.240] in Oregon?
[48:26.240 --> 48:28.240] You don't have to have a driver's license
[48:28.240 --> 48:30.240] unless you're driving a big rig
[48:30.240 --> 48:32.240] or a...
[48:32.240 --> 48:34.240] Well, yeah, I'm very familiar
[48:34.240 --> 48:36.240] with the argument. I made it.
[48:36.240 --> 48:38.240] But...
[48:38.240 --> 48:40.240] I want to use it if I can so I don't have to...
[48:40.240 --> 48:42.240] How well do you know the laws in the state
[48:42.240 --> 48:44.240] you're in?
[48:44.240 --> 48:46.240] Okay, so...
[48:46.240 --> 48:48.240] I'm going to move to probably Washington
[48:48.240 --> 48:50.240] and...
[48:50.240 --> 48:52.240] Well, if you move to Washington
[48:52.240 --> 48:54.240] all you got to do is pay Louis
[48:54.240 --> 48:56.240] Ewing some money and he'll tell you exactly how it all
[48:56.240 --> 48:58.240] works. He claims to be
[48:58.240 --> 49:00.240] the RCW code buster that can
[49:00.240 --> 49:02.240] make sure you never pay another ticket in Washington.
[49:02.240 --> 49:04.240] Let me see.
[49:04.240 --> 49:06.240] How do I get all of them?
[49:08.240 --> 49:10.240] I was being facetious.
[49:10.240 --> 49:12.240] And you can go out there and talk to him
[49:12.240 --> 49:14.240] but I guarantee you he won't like
[49:14.240 --> 49:16.240] where he leaves you.
[49:16.240 --> 49:18.240] Okay, I don't know anybody who wants...
[49:18.240 --> 49:20.240] Washington...
[49:20.240 --> 49:22.240] If you go to Washington state, the Washington state's
[49:22.240 --> 49:24.240] codes are probably one of the most
[49:24.240 --> 49:26.240] clear codes in any
[49:26.240 --> 49:28.240] state in the U.S.
[49:28.240 --> 49:30.240] that they're commercial.
[49:30.240 --> 49:32.240] All you got to do is study them and you'll learn that.
[49:32.240 --> 49:34.240] Because that, just like in certain
[49:34.240 --> 49:36.240] parts of the California code,
[49:36.240 --> 49:38.240] it's written right into the code
[49:38.240 --> 49:40.240] that it only applies to commercial
[49:40.240 --> 49:42.240] vehicles.
[49:42.240 --> 49:44.240] Is that good because you believe
[49:44.240 --> 49:46.240] they can't do anything?
[49:46.240 --> 49:48.240] It's only good if you know how to
[49:48.240 --> 49:50.240] get that information out in court.
[49:50.240 --> 49:52.240] It's the reason I asked you
[49:52.240 --> 49:54.240] how well do you know the laws of the state
[49:54.240 --> 49:56.240] and court procedure.
[49:56.240 --> 49:58.240] They're all rather close to me.
[49:58.240 --> 50:00.240] Like the previous caller,
[50:00.240 --> 50:02.240] he seems to think that logic is going to
[50:02.240 --> 50:04.240] work with these...
[50:04.240 --> 50:06.240] No, no, no, no, no. I never said
[50:06.240 --> 50:08.240] logic, I said law.
[50:08.240 --> 50:10.240] And they are not in any way
[50:10.240 --> 50:12.240] nearly the same thing.
[50:12.240 --> 50:14.240] They're only
[50:14.240 --> 50:16.240] very vaguely related
[50:16.240 --> 50:18.240] to one another.
[50:18.240 --> 50:20.240] Where we're going here
[50:20.240 --> 50:22.240] is there is a presumption
[50:22.240 --> 50:24.240] that if you have
[50:24.240 --> 50:26.240] the law and the facts on your side
[50:26.240 --> 50:28.240] somehow you'll win your case.
[50:30.240 --> 50:32.240] That's not how it works in the world
[50:32.240 --> 50:34.240] you and I live in.
[50:34.240 --> 50:36.240] You will only win
[50:36.240 --> 50:38.240] your case if you have the politics on
[50:38.240 --> 50:40.240] your side. The law is only
[50:40.240 --> 50:42.240] fairly
[50:42.240 --> 50:44.240] barely related to what
[50:44.240 --> 50:46.240] actually goes on.
[50:46.240 --> 50:48.240] You can study the code
[50:48.240 --> 50:50.240] and make a very
[50:50.240 --> 50:52.240] cogent and compelling
[50:52.240 --> 50:54.240] argument that
[50:54.240 --> 50:56.240] the traffic code doesn't apply
[50:56.240 --> 50:58.240] to you when you are
[50:58.240 --> 51:00.240] traveling.
[51:00.240 --> 51:02.240] But that's not going to make
[51:02.240 --> 51:04.240] any difference when you
[51:04.240 --> 51:06.240] go to the state of Washington
[51:06.240 --> 51:08.240] and petition the state of Washington
[51:08.240 --> 51:10.240] for a driver's license
[51:10.240 --> 51:12.240] and they say
[51:12.240 --> 51:14.240] you had it revoked in
[51:14.240 --> 51:16.240] Idaho, you're not getting one here
[51:16.240 --> 51:18.240] or when you get pulled
[51:18.240 --> 51:20.240] over without a driver's license
[51:20.240 --> 51:22.240] and they drag you down to the jail
[51:22.240 --> 51:24.240] house and throw you in, you know
[51:24.240 --> 51:26.240] you can tell them all about your rights
[51:26.240 --> 51:28.240] but could you have
[51:28.240 --> 51:30.240] to do it from the jail cell?
[51:30.240 --> 51:32.240] So
[51:32.240 --> 51:34.240] where I'm going here is
[51:34.240 --> 51:36.240] what are you trying to achieve?
[51:36.240 --> 51:38.240] I want to be able to drive
[51:38.240 --> 51:40.240] without being harassed
[51:40.240 --> 51:42.240] by these public
[51:42.240 --> 51:44.240] servants.
[51:44.240 --> 51:46.240] Okay, what are you
[51:46.240 --> 51:48.240] willing to do to get to
[51:48.240 --> 51:50.240] that point?
[51:50.240 --> 51:52.240] Well, they've taken everything pretty much away
[51:52.240 --> 51:54.240] from me and life that I enjoy.
[51:54.240 --> 51:56.240] Okay.
[51:56.240 --> 51:58.240] I have an answer to the question.
[51:58.240 --> 52:00.240] The question is
[52:00.240 --> 52:02.240] what are you willing to do
[52:02.240 --> 52:04.240] to be able to achieve
[52:04.240 --> 52:06.240] the goal you just stated?
[52:06.240 --> 52:08.240] I'm going to study every statute
[52:08.240 --> 52:10.240] if it's a
[52:10.240 --> 52:12.240] positive to snow
[52:12.240 --> 52:14.240] or I mean Washington
[52:14.240 --> 52:16.240] that goes strictly by
[52:16.240 --> 52:18.240] if I'm understanding the other gentleman
[52:18.240 --> 52:20.240] what he said, they have real
[52:20.240 --> 52:22.240] strict codes. If I study those
[52:22.240 --> 52:24.240] then I can get them stuck
[52:24.240 --> 52:26.240] where I'm not okay.
[52:26.240 --> 52:28.240] That is a presupposition
[52:28.240 --> 52:30.240] that we have not found to be true.
[52:30.240 --> 52:32.240] No car without being harassed
[52:32.240 --> 52:34.240] by the public.
[52:34.240 --> 52:36.240] Okay, hang on.
[52:36.240 --> 52:38.240] You're talking not listening.
[52:38.240 --> 52:40.240] Hang on just a second.
[52:40.240 --> 52:42.240] You have stated a presupposition
[52:42.240 --> 52:44.240] that
[52:44.240 --> 52:46.240] if you study the law
[52:46.240 --> 52:48.240] and learn the law really well
[52:48.240 --> 52:50.240] and bring the law to these courts
[52:50.240 --> 52:52.240] they'll say
[52:52.240 --> 52:54.240] oh my goodness
[52:54.240 --> 52:56.240] all this stuff we've been doing
[52:56.240 --> 52:58.240] all these years has been generating
[52:58.240 --> 53:00.240] all of this tremendous revenue
[53:00.240 --> 53:02.240] well gee willikers
[53:02.240 --> 53:04.240] we were all wrong
[53:04.240 --> 53:06.240] and screwed up we're going to have to stop this
[53:06.240 --> 53:08.240] and fire half our staff
[53:08.240 --> 53:10.240] and reduce
[53:10.240 --> 53:12.240] our budget dramatically
[53:12.240 --> 53:14.240] you've got to be kidding.
[53:14.240 --> 53:16.240] That's why I ask you
[53:16.240 --> 53:18.240] what are you
[53:18.240 --> 53:20.240] willing to do?
[53:20.240 --> 53:22.240] I'm going to study for the next 10 years.
[53:22.240 --> 53:24.240] Okay
[53:24.240 --> 53:26.240] well for good
[53:26.240 --> 53:28.240] because I've got 18 under my belt
[53:28.240 --> 53:30.240] trying to learn how to deal with this stuff
[53:30.240 --> 53:32.240] in Texas.
[53:32.240 --> 53:34.240] We're not trying to push you off.
[53:34.240 --> 53:36.240] It's really important that we
[53:36.240 --> 53:38.240] understand that
[53:38.240 --> 53:40.240] you're not dealing with
[53:40.240 --> 53:42.240] people who are
[53:42.240 --> 53:44.240] uh
[53:44.240 --> 53:46.240] upstanding
[53:46.240 --> 53:48.240] you're dealing with corrupt officials
[53:48.240 --> 53:50.240] and it's not so much that they're corrupt
[53:50.240 --> 53:52.240] they're inside a system
[53:52.240 --> 53:54.240] that has been working this
[53:54.240 --> 53:56.240] way
[53:56.240 --> 53:58.240] anybody who comes along
[53:58.240 --> 54:00.240] and says wait a minute guys
[54:00.240 --> 54:02.240] this emperor doesn't have any
[54:02.240 --> 54:04.240] clothes on
[54:04.240 --> 54:06.240] they're not going to see that
[54:06.240 --> 54:08.240] so when you go into this
[54:08.240 --> 54:10.240] battle it's a long
[54:10.240 --> 54:12.240] uphill battle
[54:12.240 --> 54:14.240] and never expect them
[54:14.240 --> 54:16.240] to do the right thing
[54:16.240 --> 54:18.240] always
[54:18.240 --> 54:20.240] expect them to do the wrong thing
[54:20.240 --> 54:22.240] and have something to do
[54:22.240 --> 54:24.240] when they do the wrong thing
[54:24.240 --> 54:26.240] before you ever start
[54:26.240 --> 54:28.240] decide what
[54:28.240 --> 54:30.240] for you would be
[54:30.240 --> 54:32.240] a positive
[54:32.240 --> 54:34.240] and equitable outcome
[54:34.240 --> 54:36.240] and be
[54:36.240 --> 54:38.240] careful only to do things
[54:38.240 --> 54:40.240] that would lead you toward
[54:40.240 --> 54:42.240] that outcome
[54:42.240 --> 54:44.240] if you lay that down to start with
[54:44.240 --> 54:46.240] you'll find you are
[54:46.240 --> 54:48.240] far more effective than you
[54:48.240 --> 54:50.240] would be in the other way
[54:50.240 --> 54:52.240] so
[54:52.240 --> 54:54.240] what do you want
[54:56.240 --> 54:58.240] well I like to have my
[54:58.240 --> 55:00.240] gun rights back
[55:00.240 --> 55:02.240] I like to have a car that I can drive
[55:02.240 --> 55:04.240] without being harassed
[55:04.240 --> 55:06.240] I like to have a job
[55:06.240 --> 55:08.240] where I can make some money
[55:08.240 --> 55:10.240] and have fun things to do
[55:10.240 --> 55:12.240] okay that's not what I'm asking
[55:12.240 --> 55:14.240] I'm asking
[55:16.240 --> 55:18.240] what your outcome
[55:18.240 --> 55:20.240] what outcome are you trying
[55:20.240 --> 55:22.240] to achieve not what you want
[55:22.240 --> 55:24.240] I would like to
[55:26.240 --> 55:28.240] be able to drive
[55:28.240 --> 55:30.240] and get pulled over and be able to
[55:30.240 --> 55:32.240] show them I don't know
[55:32.240 --> 55:34.240] I could show them my insurance
[55:34.240 --> 55:36.240] and I could show them
[55:38.240 --> 55:40.240] okay we're not asking you
[55:40.240 --> 55:42.240] to tell us right at this moment
[55:42.240 --> 55:44.240] really my question is more of a
[55:44.240 --> 55:46.240] rhetorical question
[55:46.240 --> 55:48.240] if we're to
[55:48.240 --> 55:50.240] achieve any outcome
[55:50.240 --> 55:52.240] we're going to have to
[55:52.240 --> 55:54.240] exercise a considerable amount
[55:54.240 --> 55:56.240] of self discipline
[55:56.240 --> 55:58.240] and in order to
[55:58.240 --> 56:00.240] achieve anything
[56:00.240 --> 56:02.240] we're going to have to sacrifice
[56:02.240 --> 56:04.240] something else
[56:04.240 --> 56:06.240] it's just the way it works
[56:06.240 --> 56:08.240] so first
[56:08.240 --> 56:10.240] you need to determine
[56:10.240 --> 56:12.240] what would be an equitable
[56:12.240 --> 56:14.240] outcome
[56:14.240 --> 56:16.240] your wants and wishes
[56:16.240 --> 56:18.240] they're not necessarily relevant
[56:18.240 --> 56:20.240] and besides
[56:20.240 --> 56:22.240] you will not achieve
[56:22.240 --> 56:24.240] in your life what you want
[56:24.240 --> 56:26.240] or what you wish for
[56:26.240 --> 56:28.240] the mind's not motivated that way
[56:28.240 --> 56:30.240] I understand your question now
[56:30.240 --> 56:32.240] okay
[56:32.240 --> 56:34.240] I'd like to have freedom to ride them
[56:34.240 --> 56:36.240] or cycle and if I get pulled over
[56:36.240 --> 56:38.240] and they told my bike and I end up losing
[56:38.240 --> 56:40.240] it to my camera for it to get it out
[56:40.240 --> 56:42.240] in time or whatever
[56:42.240 --> 56:44.240] and I'd like to be able to go to court
[56:44.240 --> 56:46.240] and if they send me to jail
[56:46.240 --> 56:48.240] I'd like to deal even if it's like six months
[56:48.240 --> 56:50.240] which is if you've never been in jail
[56:50.240 --> 56:52.240] one month thirty days is a long time
[56:52.240 --> 56:54.240] if you've never been there
[56:54.240 --> 56:56.240] you are speaking to the choir
[56:56.240 --> 56:58.240] here Bubba
[56:58.240 --> 57:00.240] yeah and you know I want to be able to come out
[57:00.240 --> 57:02.240] and then it's payback
[57:02.240 --> 57:04.240] you know that's what I'm talking about
[57:04.240 --> 57:06.240] okay still
[57:06.240 --> 57:08.240] you're talking about what you want
[57:10.240 --> 57:12.240] take some time think about it
[57:12.240 --> 57:14.240] if you don't know
[57:14.240 --> 57:16.240] where you're going
[57:16.240 --> 57:18.240] it's a very good chance you'll wind up somewhere else
[57:18.240 --> 57:20.240] but if you
[57:20.240 --> 57:22.240] know precisely what your intended
[57:22.240 --> 57:24.240] outcome is
[57:24.240 --> 57:26.240] that has an extremely
[57:26.240 --> 57:28.240] powerful effect on the mind
[57:28.240 --> 57:30.240] the reason I say
[57:30.240 --> 57:32.240] you will not achieve what you want
[57:32.240 --> 57:34.240] and what you wish for
[57:34.240 --> 57:36.240] it's because for the most part
[57:36.240 --> 57:38.240] we tend to want
[57:38.240 --> 57:40.240] and wish for the things we don't have
[57:40.240 --> 57:42.240] and we really don't think we will have
[57:44.240 --> 57:46.240] and
[57:46.240 --> 57:48.240] that does not motivate the mind
[57:48.240 --> 57:50.240] toward their achievement
[57:50.240 --> 57:52.240] the mind is motivated
[57:52.240 --> 57:54.240] toward your expectations
[57:56.240 --> 57:58.240] if you expect something to happen
[57:58.240 --> 58:00.240] if you expect a certain condition
[58:00.240 --> 58:02.240] to occur
[58:02.240 --> 58:04.240] everything you do
[58:04.240 --> 58:06.240] every decision that you make
[58:06.240 --> 58:08.240] will be focused toward that outcome
[58:08.240 --> 58:10.240] it's not that way
[58:10.240 --> 58:12.240] what you want to do
[58:12.240 --> 58:14.240] this is Randy Calvin
[58:14.240 --> 58:16.240] Deb. Steve and Teddy Craig with our radio
[58:16.240 --> 58:18.240] we're going to our top of
[58:18.240 --> 58:20.240] the hour break
[58:20.240 --> 58:22.240] we're talking to Barrett in Idaho
[58:22.240 --> 58:24.240] I see
[58:24.240 --> 58:26.240] Rick from Pennsylvania
[58:26.240 --> 58:28.240] and Rudy from Texas
[58:28.240 --> 58:30.240] we'll pick you up when we get back on the other side
[58:30.240 --> 58:32.240] a calling number
[58:32.240 --> 58:34.240] 512-646-1984
[58:34.240 --> 58:36.240] a calling early
[58:36.240 --> 58:38.240] so we get in line
[58:38.240 --> 58:40.240] we'll be taking calls
[58:40.240 --> 58:42.240] as long as people are called again
[58:42.240 --> 58:44.240] so we'll be right back
[59:00.240 --> 59:02.240] would you like to make more
[59:02.240 --> 59:04.240] definite progress in your walk with God
[59:04.240 --> 59:06.240] Bibles for America
[59:06.240 --> 59:08.240] is offering a free study Bible
[59:08.240 --> 59:10.240] and a set of free Christian books
[59:10.240 --> 59:12.240] that can really help
[59:12.240 --> 59:14.240] the New Testament recovery version
[59:14.240 --> 59:16.240] is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today
[59:16.240 --> 59:18.240] it's an accurate translation
[59:18.240 --> 59:20.240] and it contains thousands of footnotes
[59:20.240 --> 59:22.240] that will help you to know God
[59:22.240 --> 59:24.240] and to know the meaning of life
[59:24.240 --> 59:26.240] the free books are a three volume set
[59:26.240 --> 59:28.240] called basic elements of the Christian life
[59:28.240 --> 59:30.240] chapter by chapter
[59:30.240 --> 59:32.240] basic elements of the Christian life
[59:32.240 --> 59:34.240] that really presents God's plan of salvation
[59:34.240 --> 59:36.240] growing in Christ
[59:36.240 --> 59:38.240] and how to build up the church
[59:38.240 --> 59:40.240] to order your free New Testament recovery version
[59:40.240 --> 59:42.240] and basic elements of the Christian life
[59:42.240 --> 59:44.240] call Bibles for America
[59:44.240 --> 59:46.240] toll free
[59:46.240 --> 59:48.240] at 888-551-0102
[59:48.240 --> 59:50.240] that's 888-551-0102
[59:50.240 --> 59:52.240] or visit us online
[59:52.240 --> 01:00:02.240] at bfa.org
[01:00:02.240 --> 01:00:04.240] in 1946
[01:00:04.240 --> 01:00:06.240] Felix Gulce answered his doorbell
[01:00:06.240 --> 01:00:08.240] and was shot in the chest and killed
[01:00:08.240 --> 01:00:10.240] the case has finally been solved
[01:00:10.240 --> 01:00:12.240] 65 years later with the confession
[01:00:12.240 --> 01:00:14.240] of a 96 year old woman
[01:00:14.240 --> 01:00:16.240] it's quite a story
[01:00:16.240 --> 01:00:22.240] and some of this has served me as president
[01:00:22.240 --> 01:00:24.200] I pulled out my Republic holiness
[01:00:24.200 --> 01:00:26.240] which you know developed until recently
[01:00:26.240 --> 01:00:28.240] what I've read in a book
[01:00:28.240 --> 01:00:40.240] I give you that
[01:00:40.240 --> 01:00:42.240] what I give you our freedom
[01:00:42.240 --> 01:00:45.240] and then start over with start page.
[01:00:46.240 --> 01:00:51.240] Addie Visser was part of the resistance when the Nazis occupied Holland in World War II.
[01:00:51.240 --> 01:00:56.240] She took a gun and doled out vigilante justice to a guy named Felix Gulja,
[01:00:56.240 --> 01:01:00.240] a Dutch businessman and Nazi sympathizer who did business with the enemy.
[01:01:00.240 --> 01:01:05.240] Trouble is, Gulja was actually doing what Oscar Schindler did in the movie Schindler's List.
[01:01:05.240 --> 01:01:10.240] While pretending to support the Nazis, he was actually sheltering Jews and helping them to safety.
[01:01:10.240 --> 01:01:16.240] Addie discovered her mistake after the murder and carried the tragic secret 65 years.
[01:01:16.240 --> 01:01:20.240] Her conscience finally got the better of her and at age 96 she confessed.
[01:01:20.240 --> 01:01:25.240] The moral? Things aren't always what they seem, so think before you shoot.
[01:01:25.240 --> 01:01:30.240] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:31.240 --> 01:01:34.240] The latest trend in footwear is the barefoot shoe.
[01:01:34.240 --> 01:01:39.240] While it may seem like an oxymoron, people are spending hard earned money on special shoes
[01:01:39.240 --> 01:01:43.240] so they can feel like they're walking barefoot. Sound crazy?
[01:01:43.240 --> 01:01:46.240] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment to explain.
[01:01:46.240 --> 01:01:52.240] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.240 --> 01:01:57.240] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.240 --> 01:02:02.240] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.240 --> 01:02:05.240] Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.240 --> 01:02:08.240] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:02:08.240 --> 01:02:12.240] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:12.240 --> 01:02:15.240] Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.240 --> 01:02:18.240] Fabulous fitness or just a fad?
[01:02:18.240 --> 01:02:22.240] Shoes with wafer thin rubber soles make it feel like you're barefoot.
[01:02:22.240 --> 01:02:27.240] Advocates say they use the body's natural biomechanics to strengthen muscles and improve posture.
[01:02:27.240 --> 01:02:32.240] Whatever they do, they're a far cry from the art support and shock absorption
[01:02:32.240 --> 01:02:35.240] the footwear industry has spent decades telling us we need.
[01:02:35.240 --> 01:02:39.240] So which is better? High-tech enhancement or the foot as nature intended?
[01:02:39.240 --> 01:02:45.240] Promoters say barefoot is best, pointing out that Kalahari Bushmen run barefoot for hours in the desert,
[01:02:45.240 --> 01:02:48.240] chasing antelopes till the animals die.
[01:02:48.240 --> 01:02:52.240] But if we really wanted to follow their lead, wouldn't we just dump the pricey footwear all together?
[01:02:52.240 --> 01:02:54.240] Hey, if the shoe fits.
[01:02:54.240 --> 01:02:59.240] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:24.240 --> 01:03:31.240] All right, folks. We are back.
[01:03:31.240 --> 01:03:34.240] This video is over.
[01:03:34.240 --> 01:03:37.240] Thank you for watching.
[01:03:37.240 --> 01:03:42.240] If you enjoyed this video, please like, share, and subscribe.
[01:03:42.240 --> 01:03:55.240] All right, folks. We are back. This video is rule of law radio.
[01:03:55.240 --> 01:04:00.240] Our calling number is 512-646-1984.
[01:04:00.240 --> 01:04:02.240] So don't wait around for the last minute.
[01:04:02.240 --> 01:04:07.240] Now, please get in line and let's get it dealt with so we can get the next person on.
[01:04:07.240 --> 01:04:15.240] By now, we're going to go to Rich in Pennsylvania. Rich, what can we do for you?
[01:04:15.240 --> 01:04:20.240] Rich?
[01:04:20.240 --> 01:04:22.240] Hello?
[01:04:22.240 --> 01:04:24.240] Yes, I added on mute. Sorry about that.
[01:04:24.240 --> 01:04:28.240] Oh, that's okay. What can we do for you?
[01:04:28.240 --> 01:04:34.240] Well, I sent an email to Randy earlier. Is this Randy I'm speaking with?
[01:04:34.240 --> 01:04:35.240] No, this is Eddie.
[01:04:35.240 --> 01:04:41.240] Eddie, okay. Well, I sent an email to Randy earlier and he requested I call into the show tonight.
[01:04:41.240 --> 01:04:51.240] Basically, I explained what had happened to me last week when I was traveling on a four-lane, divided highway.
[01:04:51.240 --> 01:04:53.240] Interesting.
[01:04:53.240 --> 01:05:01.240] It was around 1.30 in the morning and I was pulled over by a police car.
[01:05:01.240 --> 01:05:09.240] And when the officer, oh, I did my receipt belt and I put my wallet out and I waited.
[01:05:09.240 --> 01:05:13.240] I put my window down two inches when he came up to my car. I said, put the window down.
[01:05:13.240 --> 01:05:17.240] I said, did I break any law? He said, yes. Now, put your mother at the window down.
[01:05:17.240 --> 01:05:20.240] As soon as he started cursing, I grabbed my cell phone and I hit read dial.
[01:05:20.240 --> 01:05:25.240] I called my friend up and then I called him. This conversation is being recorded.
[01:05:25.240 --> 01:05:34.240] And then he insisted on me putting the window down. He got cursed and so I put it down to about four inches.
[01:05:34.240 --> 01:05:40.240] And he tried reaching his hand in there, trying to open the door.
[01:05:40.240 --> 01:05:49.240] And then he said, if you try to put that window up and crush my hand, I'm going to break your mother effing face.
[01:05:49.240 --> 01:05:54.240] If I heard him correctly, he said I'm going to break your mother effing song. He might have said the window.
[01:05:54.240 --> 01:05:58.240] He might have said my face anyway. He was cursing and threatening me.
[01:05:58.240 --> 01:06:06.240] And so as soon as he withdrew his hand, I put it back to the two inch mark, you know, and then I asked him, what law did I break?
[01:06:06.240 --> 01:06:10.240] They never did tell me. He never asked me for my driver's license.
[01:06:10.240 --> 01:06:13.240] He just said, I'm going to put the window down. I'm going to break it.
[01:06:13.240 --> 01:06:18.240] Then he hit it before I even had a chance with his weighted flashlight.
[01:06:18.240 --> 01:06:25.240] And then, you know, before I could even respond to put it down after that, he hit it again and smashed it.
[01:06:25.240 --> 01:06:29.240] The glass flew into my face and into my mouth and they opened it.
[01:06:29.240 --> 01:06:34.240] Barbara threw me out and cuffed me and threw me on the floor behind the car.
[01:06:34.240 --> 01:06:41.240] At the same time as he broke that window, the other trooper on the other side, the right side of the car broke out the rear window.
[01:06:41.240 --> 01:06:44.240] And I guess he had his service piece aimed at my aid in case I resisted.
[01:06:44.240 --> 01:06:49.240] I didn't know that at the time. I found out later when I got out of jail three days later.
[01:06:49.240 --> 01:06:54.240] So my buddy's car had the back window busted out also. I was traveling.
[01:06:54.240 --> 01:06:56.240] What did they charge you with?
[01:06:56.240 --> 01:07:01.240] They charged me. Well, I never did listen to the charges.
[01:07:01.240 --> 01:07:07.240] But after they had me on the ground handcuffed laying on the street behind the car,
[01:07:07.240 --> 01:07:14.240] the assistant told me, we pulled you over because you failed to move out of the lane.
[01:07:14.240 --> 01:07:22.240] Because when I passed two police cars with their lights on, they were on the shoulder about ten feet off of the road with their lights blinking.
[01:07:22.240 --> 01:07:29.240] And I was in a pack of cars and it didn't seem, I don't see any reason to pull over.
[01:07:29.240 --> 01:07:35.240] Wait, do you have a law that says you either have to pull over or slow down by 20 miles an hour?
[01:07:35.240 --> 01:07:39.240] I have never seen that law.
[01:07:39.240 --> 01:07:45.240] I'm not aware of that law existing here in Pennsylvania.
[01:07:45.240 --> 01:07:52.240] And even as he never tried to talk civilly to me, he did ask for my driver's license.
[01:07:52.240 --> 01:07:55.240] He just wanted me to put that window down.
[01:07:55.240 --> 01:08:02.240] There's no law that you have to put your window down in Pennsylvania. I know that much.
[01:08:02.240 --> 01:08:05.240] I had cracked two wedges. He could talk to me civilly.
[01:08:05.240 --> 01:08:12.240] We could have came to an agreement and then if I felt comfortable, maybe I would have put it down.
[01:08:12.240 --> 01:08:18.240] But he was just, you know, using filthy vulgarity at me and screaming.
[01:08:18.240 --> 01:08:24.240] At the same time, his partner was on the other side of my other window, the passenger window,
[01:08:24.240 --> 01:08:32.240] beating on the corner and screaming, why are you doing this? Trying to create a real hostile environment.
[01:08:32.240 --> 01:08:38.240] Okay, have you filed criminal charges against them for foul language?
[01:08:38.240 --> 01:08:43.240] Ooh, I didn't even realize foul language is a charge.
[01:08:43.240 --> 01:08:49.240] Certainly is in Texas and I'm going to bet it is in Pennsylvania.
[01:08:49.240 --> 01:09:00.240] And for, I would look at aggravated assault, but to have a whole routine to go through in Pennsylvania,
[01:09:00.240 --> 01:09:06.240] you make up a set of criminal complaints against these officers for excessive use of force,
[01:09:06.240 --> 01:09:21.240] false arrest, false imprisonment and assault by the fact that they use language that a reasonable person of ordinary prudence would find defensive.
[01:09:21.240 --> 01:09:27.240] That's generally what the definition of assault is. That's simple assault.
[01:09:27.240 --> 01:09:37.240] But they committed simple assault while prominently displaying a deadly weapon that makes it aggravated assault.
[01:09:37.240 --> 01:09:42.240] Make up the complaint and take it to the district attorney.
[01:09:42.240 --> 01:09:46.240] The district attorney will refuse to prosecute.
[01:09:46.240 --> 01:10:01.240] Then file an appeal to the court of common please and prepare a complaint against the prosecutor for misfeasance in office for failing to perform his duty
[01:10:01.240 --> 01:10:05.240] and file it with the state attorney general.
[01:10:05.240 --> 01:10:10.240] And the state attorney general will refuse to prosecute the prosecutor.
[01:10:10.240 --> 01:10:16.240] And then you appeal that complaint to the court of common please.
[01:10:16.240 --> 01:10:25.240] And you file a criminal complaint with the court of common please against the attorney general.
[01:10:25.240 --> 01:10:31.240] And then the court of common please will refuse to take any action.
[01:10:31.240 --> 01:10:39.240] And in Pennsylvania, you can appeal this all the way up to the supreme.
[01:10:39.240 --> 01:10:44.240] This will be so much fun. You won't believe it.
[01:10:44.240 --> 01:10:53.240] Well, don't I need to be worried about my defense because now they're going to make up probably God only knows how many charges.
[01:10:53.240 --> 01:10:56.240] They might even charge up some felony charges.
[01:10:56.240 --> 01:11:12.240] Put in a request for court appointing counsel and a demand for the dash cams of these officers and their personal recording devices.
[01:11:12.240 --> 01:11:13.240] Okay.
[01:11:13.240 --> 01:11:16.240] That'll let them know you're coming after them.
[01:11:16.240 --> 01:11:24.240] And what they'll try to do is not produce these recordings and such and you'll fight with them.
[01:11:24.240 --> 01:11:27.240] This will get them to want to make a deal.
[01:11:27.240 --> 01:11:34.240] But when you start going after them criminally and you run the routine on them,
[01:11:34.240 --> 01:11:44.240] when the prosecuting attorney realizes that you set him up and you intended that he do exactly what he did so you could come after him,
[01:11:44.240 --> 01:11:46.240] they're going to want to make this go away.
[01:11:46.240 --> 01:11:48.240] If you're going to beat it, that's how you're going to be.
[01:11:48.240 --> 01:11:50.240] You're not going to be trying to get along with them.
[01:11:50.240 --> 01:11:59.240] I want these two tyrants taken off of the street before they come after my children or your children.
[01:11:59.240 --> 01:12:00.240] Exactly.
[01:12:00.240 --> 01:12:02.240] Now you understand your duty.
[01:12:02.240 --> 01:12:03.240] Wonderful.
[01:12:03.240 --> 01:12:05.240] It's not about you.
[01:12:05.240 --> 01:12:08.240] It's about these two guys who are out of control.
[01:12:08.240 --> 01:12:15.240] And you might make a request for any steroid used by these officers.
[01:12:15.240 --> 01:12:21.240] They're cranked on steroids. That's why they can't control themselves.
[01:12:21.240 --> 01:12:31.240] So they need somebody they don't expect to come after them and really damage their careers for them.
[01:12:31.240 --> 01:12:37.240] We were just talking last night about the guy who was videotaping the police and they arrested him.
[01:12:37.240 --> 01:12:39.240] That guy got arrested.
[01:12:39.240 --> 01:12:42.240] The guy was in his driveway videotaping him.
[01:12:42.240 --> 01:12:46.240] He came and beat the guy up and arrested him. That guy got fired.
[01:12:46.240 --> 01:12:51.240] Well, we want more than fired. We want him prosecuted. We want him in penitentiary.
[01:12:51.240 --> 01:12:56.240] So run the routine on the prosecutor.
[01:12:56.240 --> 01:12:58.240] You filed a complaint with him.
[01:12:58.240 --> 01:13:04.240] In Pennsylvania, the prosecuting attorney has first blush.
[01:13:04.240 --> 01:13:16.240] He has the first opportunity to determine whether or not he believes there is sufficient cause to warrant prosecution.
[01:13:16.240 --> 01:13:20.240] What he does not have is caprice.
[01:13:20.240 --> 01:13:26.240] He may not decide who he wants to prosecute and who he does not.
[01:13:26.240 --> 01:13:28.240] That's a breach of his duty.
[01:13:28.240 --> 01:13:35.240] That's misspeakance in office. So when he refuses to prosecute these police officers,
[01:13:35.240 --> 01:13:43.240] the attorney general for the state of Pennsylvania, unlike Texas, has prosecutorial power.
[01:13:43.240 --> 01:13:51.240] He's a prosecutor just like the district attorney is, but he tends to be a state prosecutor.
[01:13:51.240 --> 01:13:56.240] He would be the one to prosecute the prosecutor.
[01:13:56.240 --> 01:13:59.240] So you file with him.
[01:13:59.240 --> 01:14:04.240] And then when he refuses to act, you file criminal charges against him.
[01:14:04.240 --> 01:14:15.240] Now, he's the one that's more politically sensitive because every prosecutor in the state wants his job.
[01:14:15.240 --> 01:14:25.240] So when you file criminal charges against him, he's going to be an unhappy camper because his next political opponent is going to be pulling that criminal complaint out
[01:14:25.240 --> 01:14:30.240] and waving it in front of his constituents.
[01:14:30.240 --> 01:14:35.240] This is how we create ourselves a little politics.
[01:14:35.240 --> 01:14:40.240] And then you appeal this thing and push it all the way to the Supreme.
[01:14:40.240 --> 01:14:46.240] And at the same time, you need to look at putting together a civil action against it.
[01:14:46.240 --> 01:14:51.240] A civil complaint will get everybody upset.
[01:14:51.240 --> 01:15:00.240] Everybody be jumping up and down, crawling down these two cops' throat wanting to know, what did you do to this guy?
[01:15:00.240 --> 01:15:03.240] Do I have to wait until after the criminal is due to civil?
[01:15:03.240 --> 01:15:06.240] No, they don't have anything to do with each other.
[01:15:06.240 --> 01:15:08.240] Do it at the same time.
[01:15:08.240 --> 01:15:21.240] Now, see, they took me to the sheriff's department and then they moved me in the morning, 9.30 in the morning after satting herself from 2.30 to 9.30 a.m.
[01:15:21.240 --> 01:15:23.240] Then they brought me in to see a judge.
[01:15:23.240 --> 01:15:24.240] It wasn't really a judge.
[01:15:24.240 --> 01:15:26.240] It was like a cyber judge.
[01:15:26.240 --> 01:15:29.240] It was a judge on a computer screen over Skype.
[01:15:29.240 --> 01:15:31.240] And he kept talking and talking.
[01:15:31.240 --> 01:15:36.240] I couldn't get a word in edgewise until he gave me a second to answer a question.
[01:15:36.240 --> 01:15:39.240] And I said, judge, is this an article three court?
[01:15:39.240 --> 01:15:43.240] And he said, no, this is your preliminary hearing or arraignment.
[01:15:43.240 --> 01:15:45.240] I think he meant arraignment, but I think he said hearing.
[01:15:45.240 --> 01:15:50.240] But then I said, judge, do you have a current oath of office?
[01:15:50.240 --> 01:15:52.240] And he said, yes, I do.
[01:15:52.240 --> 01:15:57.240] And he said, mister, whatever your last name is, he said, do you have an address?
[01:15:57.240 --> 01:16:01.240] And I said, I said, judge, because I understand your practicing.
[01:16:01.240 --> 01:16:03.240] We're all under commercial law.
[01:16:03.240 --> 01:16:04.240] It's what my understanding is.
[01:16:04.240 --> 01:16:08.240] So I said, judge, I am the authorized representative for the name on your paper.
[01:16:08.240 --> 01:16:10.240] And then he said, that's it.
[01:16:10.240 --> 01:16:12.240] I'm done with him.
[01:16:12.240 --> 01:16:16.240] He said, the bail set at $15,000.
[01:16:16.240 --> 01:16:17.240] I'm out of here.
[01:16:17.240 --> 01:16:23.240] So then they, but he put me in jail for doing nothing.
[01:16:23.240 --> 01:16:24.240] I did nothing wrong.
[01:16:24.240 --> 01:16:26.240] So it was no crime.
[01:16:26.240 --> 01:16:30.240] File against the judge and sue the judge.
[01:16:30.240 --> 01:16:32.240] That's what I was going to ask you.
[01:16:32.240 --> 01:16:35.240] Yeah, this is, this would be a lot of fun.
[01:16:35.240 --> 01:16:38.240] There's something else I want to go into on the other side with this stuff ring.
[01:16:38.240 --> 01:16:39.240] Okay.
[01:16:39.240 --> 01:16:40.240] All right.
[01:16:40.240 --> 01:16:41.240] So hang on.
[01:16:41.240 --> 01:16:42.240] We'll be back on the other side of the break.
[01:16:42.240 --> 01:16:44.240] Folks, this is rule of law radio.
[01:16:44.240 --> 01:16:48.240] Call in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:16:48.240 --> 01:16:51.240] We'll be right back on the other side of the break.
[01:16:51.240 --> 01:16:52.240] So hang on.
[01:16:52.240 --> 01:16:54.240] All right.
[01:17:22.240 --> 01:17:24.240] All right.
[01:17:52.240 --> 01:17:54.240] We'll be back on the other side of the break.
[01:18:22.240 --> 01:18:23.240] All right.
[01:18:53.240 --> 01:18:56.240] That's 800-600-5553.
[01:18:56.240 --> 01:19:22.240] All right.
[01:19:22.240 --> 01:19:30.240] Folks, we are back.
[01:19:30.240 --> 01:19:32.240] This is rule of law radio.
[01:19:32.240 --> 01:19:35.240] Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:35.240 --> 01:19:39.240] We got, we're just a little over an hour into the show.
[01:19:39.240 --> 01:19:43.240] We do got several callers on the board, but by no means a full board.
[01:19:43.240 --> 01:19:47.240] So if you've got any issues, questions or anything of that nature, especially mortgage
[01:19:47.240 --> 01:19:50.240] tonight, tonight to get it in because Randy's here.
[01:19:50.240 --> 01:19:53.240] The Mondays and Thursdays, we may or may not be able to get the mortgage stuff.
[01:19:53.240 --> 01:19:54.240] All right.
[01:19:54.240 --> 01:19:56.240] We're going to finish up with Rich in Pennsylvania.
[01:19:56.240 --> 01:20:00.240] All right, Rich, let's continue on here.
[01:20:00.240 --> 01:20:07.240] When you were talking to this judge, does Pennsylvania have a constitutional or statutory
[01:20:07.240 --> 01:20:12.240] requirement that all court proceedings shall be public?
[01:20:12.240 --> 01:20:14.240] That's a good question.
[01:20:14.240 --> 01:20:20.240] I do believe that that is a statute, but I can't prove that yet.
[01:20:20.240 --> 01:20:22.240] I need to get a copy of the rules of court.
[01:20:22.240 --> 01:20:23.240] I don't happen to have it.
[01:20:23.240 --> 01:20:25.240] Well, that's not going to be in the rules of court.
[01:20:25.240 --> 01:20:28.240] That's going to be in the state statutes and in the state constitution.
[01:20:28.240 --> 01:20:33.240] See, the problem with these closed circuit hearings is that they are not held before
[01:20:33.240 --> 01:20:39.240] the public, which violates the constitutional requirements and the statutory requirements
[01:20:39.240 --> 01:20:40.240] of the state.
[01:20:40.240 --> 01:20:46.240] Here in Texas, the constitutional requirement is codified within the statute.
[01:20:46.240 --> 01:20:54.240] They are required that all courts and therefore any proceedings of the court must be public.
[01:20:54.240 --> 01:20:59.240] This closed circuit crap in the jail is completely illegal.
[01:20:59.240 --> 01:21:05.240] The legislature in Texas at least has created contradictory statutes.
[01:21:05.240 --> 01:21:11.240] You can't declare court proceedings must be public and then turn around and say, but
[01:21:11.240 --> 01:21:20.240] you can also conduct them by closed circuit TV without the public.
[01:21:20.240 --> 01:21:23.240] That's what they've tried to do here.
[01:21:23.240 --> 01:21:26.240] I'm willing to bet the same thing will fly there.
[01:21:26.240 --> 01:21:27.240] Great.
[01:21:27.240 --> 01:21:32.240] Maybe we can get this judge knocked out too.
[01:21:32.240 --> 01:21:36.240] Well, that'll be a different fight, but yeah, that's still possible.
[01:21:36.240 --> 01:21:37.240] It's not a real judge.
[01:21:37.240 --> 01:21:44.240] It's a magistrate and a judge are the same thing.
[01:21:44.240 --> 01:21:48.240] They're just a different hat with different duties.
[01:21:48.240 --> 01:21:53.240] A magistrate cannot preside over a trial, for instance.
[01:21:53.240 --> 01:21:56.240] Only a judge can sit in trial.
[01:21:56.240 --> 01:22:01.240] Same guy, different hat.
[01:22:01.240 --> 01:22:05.240] All judges are by default magistrates.
[01:22:05.240 --> 01:22:15.240] We're talking about Pennsylvania here and I think there are magistrates specifically
[01:22:15.240 --> 01:22:17.240] in Pennsylvania.
[01:22:17.240 --> 01:22:22.240] They have some peculiarities with the naming conventions.
[01:22:22.240 --> 01:22:27.240] They have judges that they call magistrates.
[01:22:27.240 --> 01:22:29.240] Isn't that right, Rich?
[01:22:29.240 --> 01:22:31.240] Yes.
[01:22:31.240 --> 01:22:37.240] We have these small court magistrates that you go through for traffic violations.
[01:22:37.240 --> 01:22:45.240] If you don't like the way that came out, you can appeal it to the county court of appeals.
[01:22:45.240 --> 01:22:48.240] They're district judges, district court.
[01:22:48.240 --> 01:22:49.240] I think he would come.
[01:22:49.240 --> 01:22:52.240] Wouldn't that be the court of common police?
[01:22:52.240 --> 01:22:53.240] Court of common police.
[01:22:53.240 --> 01:22:55.240] That's the one I was looking for.
[01:22:55.240 --> 01:22:59.240] It starts in the court of common police and I think they call that judge a magistrate.
[01:22:59.240 --> 01:23:07.240] But this is a matter of a naming convention, not of what authority they have.
[01:23:07.240 --> 01:23:16.240] In most states, all judges are called judges, but all judges also are magistrates.
[01:23:16.240 --> 01:23:24.240] When they sit for the purpose of examining into a criminal accusation, then they act in that magisterial capacity.
[01:23:24.240 --> 01:23:30.240] It's somewhat different in Pennsylvania.
[01:23:30.240 --> 01:23:32.240] Well, technically, it's the same.
[01:23:32.240 --> 01:23:39.240] My question about the judge when you saw him, was there a prosecuting attorney present?
[01:23:39.240 --> 01:23:41.240] No, it was just two chefs.
[01:23:41.240 --> 01:23:47.240] Did the judge have information about you?
[01:23:47.240 --> 01:23:50.240] They did have, like, my name, you know.
[01:23:50.240 --> 01:23:51.240] Okay.
[01:23:51.240 --> 01:23:54.240] Did he have the charges against you?
[01:23:54.240 --> 01:23:55.240] Yes, there was.
[01:23:55.240 --> 01:23:58.240] I don't know if there were all the charges, but he...
[01:23:58.240 --> 01:24:01.240] How did he get those?
[01:24:01.240 --> 01:24:03.240] Sorry?
[01:24:03.240 --> 01:24:06.240] How did he get those charges against you?
[01:24:06.240 --> 01:24:12.240] The police must have faxed over, you know, their police report.
[01:24:12.240 --> 01:24:14.240] Okay, okay.
[01:24:14.240 --> 01:24:19.240] I kind of understood that part, but I was going somewhere.
[01:24:19.240 --> 01:24:28.240] All of these hearings will have to be held in accordance with the rules of evidence.
[01:24:28.240 --> 01:24:44.240] And how did the judge get evidence presented to him against you without you being present to raise a objection to the evidence being presented?
[01:24:44.240 --> 01:24:54.240] Did he hold a hearing wherein that evidence was presented to him while you were being held in detail and excluded from that hearing?
[01:24:54.240 --> 01:24:59.240] How did he get that information?
[01:24:59.240 --> 01:25:00.240] I...
[01:25:00.240 --> 01:25:04.240] Read the Code of Criminal Procedure and read the rules of evidence.
[01:25:04.240 --> 01:25:12.240] It'll tell you how evidence is to be presented to a court, and it's not done the way they do it.
[01:25:12.240 --> 01:25:15.240] What I do understand about the rules of evidence is it's...
[01:25:15.240 --> 01:25:22.240] When they're charging me with something, they have the responsibility to prove me guilty.
[01:25:22.240 --> 01:25:23.240] I don't know.
[01:25:23.240 --> 01:25:24.240] That's...
[01:25:24.240 --> 01:25:26.240] Okay, yeah, we understand that part.
[01:25:26.240 --> 01:25:28.240] We're backing up a little bit before then.
[01:25:28.240 --> 01:25:29.240] Right.
[01:25:29.240 --> 01:25:37.240] Now, you can present a complaint to a magistrate if you're seeking a warrant.
[01:25:37.240 --> 01:25:46.240] And it is expected that if you're seeking a warrant, that the person arrested is not...
[01:25:46.240 --> 01:25:49.240] The person that you want a warrant for hasn't been arrested.
[01:25:49.240 --> 01:25:51.240] He's not available.
[01:25:51.240 --> 01:25:58.240] So they hold those hearings ex parte because the other guys need to get the warrant so they can go get it.
[01:25:58.240 --> 01:26:06.240] And every warrant I've ever seen says it orders the sheriff to arrest this person.
[01:26:06.240 --> 01:26:10.240] And bring him before me.
[01:26:10.240 --> 01:26:18.240] The reason for that is, is the magistrate, the judge in his magisterial capacity,
[01:26:18.240 --> 01:26:27.240] issued a warrant based on evidence from one party in an ex parte hearing.
[01:26:27.240 --> 01:26:33.240] So you're to arrest that person, bring him before me so we can have a hearing with both parties.
[01:26:33.240 --> 01:26:43.240] So these police arrest you, hold you in jail, and then go to the magistrate to get a warrant issued.
[01:26:43.240 --> 01:26:44.240] Wow.
[01:26:44.240 --> 01:26:48.240] What's wrong with that picture?
[01:26:48.240 --> 01:26:50.240] Yeah, they went out of sequence.
[01:26:50.240 --> 01:26:51.240] Exactly.
[01:26:51.240 --> 01:26:53.240] They should have had you...
[01:26:53.240 --> 01:27:00.240] They should have convened a hearing with you in there, the police in there, and a prosecutor.
[01:27:00.240 --> 01:27:05.240] The police can't present the information because he's a witness.
[01:27:05.240 --> 01:27:12.240] The prosecutor has to establish foundation for the information and then offer it to the court,
[01:27:12.240 --> 01:27:17.240] give you an opportunity to examine it and raise an objection to it.
[01:27:17.240 --> 01:27:22.240] Now, don't they make something called an affidavit of probable cause?
[01:27:22.240 --> 01:27:23.240] Yes.
[01:27:23.240 --> 01:27:24.240] The sequence?
[01:27:24.240 --> 01:27:31.240] Yeah, you should have been given opportunity to read the affidavit in support of the criminal complaint.
[01:27:31.240 --> 01:27:37.240] Sometimes the criminal complaint will include the statement of probable cause and that's perfectly acceptable.
[01:27:37.240 --> 01:27:43.240] But you get an opportunity to look at it and determine whether or not you believe it's proper evidence.
[01:27:43.240 --> 01:27:52.240] I was told by a lawyer that I can't start my discovery process until after my formal arraignment.
[01:27:52.240 --> 01:27:55.240] And that was clearly considered my preliminary arraignment.
[01:27:55.240 --> 01:27:58.240] Okay, let me explain how this goes.
[01:27:58.240 --> 01:28:05.240] The reason for that is the court of jurisdiction doesn't have jurisdiction yet.
[01:28:05.240 --> 01:28:09.240] The first hearing, they're calling it a preliminary hearing.
[01:28:09.240 --> 01:28:12.240] It is an examining trial.
[01:28:12.240 --> 01:28:18.240] This is where a magistrate does the only two things he can do.
[01:28:18.240 --> 01:28:27.240] He examines into the sufficiency of an allegation and makes a determination of probable cause.
[01:28:27.240 --> 01:28:33.240] And then if he finds probable cause, sets bail.
[01:28:33.240 --> 01:28:53.240] And then the complaint, the criminal complaint will give the magistrate subject matter jurisdiction to hold a hearing to determine whether or not there's sufficient evidence to cause this person to have to stand in answer to the criminal accusation.
[01:28:53.240 --> 01:28:56.240] If there's not enough evidence, he's to dismiss the whole thing.
[01:28:56.240 --> 01:29:03.240] If there is, then he's to enter a finding of probable cause and issue a warrant if you've been arrested without a warrant.
[01:29:03.240 --> 01:29:05.240] He's to issue one.
[01:29:05.240 --> 01:29:11.240] And then forward that to the clerk of the court having jurisdiction.
[01:29:11.240 --> 01:29:20.240] And his finding of probable cause is what will give the court the trial court jurisdiction.
[01:29:20.240 --> 01:29:28.240] And then the trial court, they have to bring you in, identify you, and take a plea.
[01:29:28.240 --> 01:29:31.240] That hearing's called an arraignment.
[01:29:31.240 --> 01:29:42.240] And it can only be held after a finding of probable cause has been presented to the court with a warrant showing that the court has subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:29:42.240 --> 01:29:52.240] Yeah, okay. This is Randy Calderon, Chief of State of Craigwood, Florida Radio. And when we come back, I'll touch on that a little bit more and then we'll move ahead with your other issues.
[01:29:52.240 --> 01:30:00.240] Call in number 512-646-1984. Give us a call. We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.240 --> 01:30:07.240] A noble lie. Oklahoma City, 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[01:30:07.240 --> 01:30:11.240] Based on the damage pattern to the building, but the government seems impossible.
[01:30:11.240 --> 01:30:15.240] The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:30:15.240 --> 01:30:18.240] The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[01:30:18.240 --> 01:30:23.240] Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:23.240 --> 01:30:27.240] The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[01:30:27.240 --> 01:30:52.240] We pose the cover up now at enoboli.com.
[01:30:52.240 --> 01:31:01.240] Call 08-6912608 or visit hempusa.org and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[01:31:01.240 --> 01:31:04.240] More energy.
[01:31:04.240 --> 01:31:09.240] Stronger immune power. Improved sense of well-being.
[01:31:09.240 --> 01:31:13.240] How many supplements have you heard boast of these benefits?
[01:31:13.240 --> 01:31:22.240] The team behind Centrition believes that supplements should over-deliver on their promises. And Centrition does just that.
[01:31:22.240 --> 01:31:26.240] Centrition utilizes the ancient healing wisdom of Chinese medicine.
[01:31:26.240 --> 01:31:32.240] In conjunction with the science of modern nutrition, adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component.
[01:31:32.240 --> 01:31:39.240] And organic hemp protein and greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base.
[01:31:39.240 --> 01:31:43.240] Plus, Centrition tastes great in just water.
[01:31:43.240 --> 01:31:48.240] This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product and it's all natural.
[01:31:48.240 --> 01:31:57.240] Visit Centrition.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436.
[01:31:57.240 --> 01:32:26.240] After you use Centrition, you'll believe in supplements again.
[01:32:26.240 --> 01:32:31.240] Alright folks, here you are back. Thank you Rich for having a good conversation here.
[01:32:31.240 --> 01:32:34.240] Randy, you want to go ahead and pitch Rich back up?
[01:32:34.240 --> 01:32:40.240] Yes. Okay, I generally don't pick guys up, but I'll deal with it.
[01:32:40.240 --> 01:32:47.240] Okay Rich, does that little dissertation make sense?
[01:32:47.240 --> 01:32:54.240] Yeah, but it leaves me with the question of can I stop the process before it determines probable cause?
[01:32:54.240 --> 01:33:01.240] Well, that was my point. They've already made a determination of probable cause.
[01:33:01.240 --> 01:33:06.240] Okay. That's what this judge did before he saw you.
[01:33:06.240 --> 01:33:09.240] Can we put a determined jurisdiction?
[01:33:09.240 --> 01:33:17.240] No, he didn't determine jurisdiction. He determined probable cause to believe the crime had been committed.
[01:33:17.240 --> 01:33:23.240] But he did that in an expert hearing from which you were excluded.
[01:33:23.240 --> 01:33:36.240] When he saw you, he merely notified you of the determination he made in his examining trial.
[01:33:36.240 --> 01:33:45.240] He held an expert hearing without you present while you were being held in the jail and prevented from attending.
[01:33:45.240 --> 01:33:52.240] And that should get charges against him. It's always good to go after a judge.
[01:33:52.240 --> 01:33:56.240] And you're going to want to ask for a Frank's hearing.
[01:33:56.240 --> 01:34:02.240] What I suggest you do is ask for court appointed counsel.
[01:34:02.240 --> 01:34:05.240] Do they have public defenders in Pennsylvania?
[01:34:05.240 --> 01:34:11.240] They do, but they're usually like the worst, you know, they're very, you know, novice.
[01:34:11.240 --> 01:34:18.240] Good. Good. That's what we want. We want a young attorney just getting started.
[01:34:18.240 --> 01:34:27.240] And he's probably got a very large student loan to pay off.
[01:34:27.240 --> 01:34:34.240] He probably didn't graduate at the top of his class because no law firm picked him up.
[01:34:34.240 --> 01:34:39.240] So he's probably struggling trying to find a way to get started.
[01:34:39.240 --> 01:34:46.240] And when you get him, you tell him that you are very well aware of your civil rights.
[01:34:46.240 --> 01:34:51.240] And these guys have breached a whole bunch of them.
[01:34:51.240 --> 01:35:00.240] And you will adequately adjudicate every single one of my civil rights.
[01:35:00.240 --> 01:35:07.240] You failed to do so. And I'll bark review for everyone.
[01:35:07.240 --> 01:35:10.240] That's going to be when you do that.
[01:35:10.240 --> 01:35:15.240] If you listen close, you could hear a pin drop.
[01:35:15.240 --> 01:35:19.240] Because they're going to get real excited. We just had a caller call in.
[01:35:19.240 --> 01:35:27.240] I think it was Thursday yesterday about he did that to his attorney.
[01:35:27.240 --> 01:35:33.240] And the attorney talked to the prosecutor and everything got dropped.
[01:35:33.240 --> 01:35:39.240] And the judge wanted him to come in and tell him how he did that.
[01:35:39.240 --> 01:35:47.240] The problem this new lawyer has is one bar grieve in cell counts is malpractice insurance.
[01:35:47.240 --> 01:35:56.240] And they're all buddies, the lawyers, the judges.
[01:35:56.240 --> 01:36:04.240] The judges, they take these new lawyers and they bring them along. They teach them.
[01:36:04.240 --> 01:36:18.240] And they're all the same fraternity. And what you will do by that is put the judge and the prosecutor in a position such that they have to protect your attorney against you.
[01:36:18.240 --> 01:36:28.240] And to keep you from ending your attorney's career before it gets started, likely they'll make this case go away.
[01:36:28.240 --> 01:36:35.240] That's going to be me.
[01:36:35.240 --> 01:36:46.240] First, take care of your liberty. Once you've got your liberty taken care of, now you're free to go after them.
[01:36:46.240 --> 01:36:53.240] And, okay, once you get this started, then you want a Frank's hearing.
[01:36:53.240 --> 01:37:01.240] And tell your public defender you want a Frank's hearing. And when you tell him that, his eyes are going to glaze over.
[01:37:01.240 --> 01:37:09.240] And he's going to say, what's a Frank's hearing? You tell him, look it up.
[01:37:09.240 --> 01:37:16.240] And when he finds out what a Frank's hearing is, he is not going to be a happy camper.
[01:37:16.240 --> 01:37:32.240] Frank's hearing, for those who haven't heard it on the show already, is a hearing for the purpose of determining the veracity of a police officer who testified before a magistrate to secure a warrant.
[01:37:32.240 --> 01:37:46.240] So you want to test the evidence given to the magistrate. In order to do that, you have to subpoena the magistrate. And by this time, you will have made allegations against the magistrate.
[01:37:46.240 --> 01:37:52.240] And when you start trying to subpoena a judge, everybody gets excited.
[01:37:52.240 --> 01:38:01.240] And that's probably the best way to make this thing go away, because they're going to try to protect that judge.
[01:38:01.240 --> 01:38:06.240] This is the judge who gave me the preliminary arraignment over the Internet.
[01:38:06.240 --> 01:38:09.240] Exactly.
[01:38:09.240 --> 01:38:16.240] Now I'm scheduled for my formal arraignment, the 23rd of this month.
[01:38:16.240 --> 01:38:35.240] You need to go in there with a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction, claiming that your civil rights were violated at the arrest site, at the jail, and by the magistrate in the jail.
[01:38:35.240 --> 01:38:48.240] And it might be a good idea to have your criminal complaints against the police officers and the magistrate in the hand of the prosecuting attorney already.
[01:38:48.240 --> 01:38:50.240] Okay, okay.
[01:38:50.240 --> 01:38:58.240] And get them kind of excited. You know, they let them know that you're going to give them a fight.
[01:38:58.240 --> 01:39:01.240] Okay, I'll do it.
[01:39:01.240 --> 01:39:05.240] It's been my experience. The best defense is a good effective offense.
[01:39:05.240 --> 01:39:07.240] Sweet.
[01:39:07.240 --> 01:39:12.240] Okay, well, I appreciate that. Andy and Eddie, good stuff.
[01:39:12.240 --> 01:39:21.240] Okay, thank you, Rich, for calling me in. Now we're going to go to Woody in Texas. Woody, Woody, what do you have for us?
[01:39:21.240 --> 01:39:24.240] Hello, Randy. Hello, Eddie. Hello, Ms. Debra.
[01:39:24.240 --> 01:39:35.240] Debra's not here tonight. She let us loose on our own to weak mayhem without her moderating influence.
[01:39:35.240 --> 01:39:45.240] She had mentioned on the phone call when I mentioned about the Texas Department of Public Safety at the DMV that I wish I had some kind of audio recording device.
[01:39:45.240 --> 01:39:55.240] And she mentioned about this smart application that you can download. And she said it would bring her something like that. And of course, I've told her to write it down and...
[01:39:55.240 --> 01:39:58.240] It's QIK.
[01:39:58.240 --> 01:40:04.240] QIK, thank you, Randy. I'm going to write that down right now. And then I would like to update Eddie real quick.
[01:40:04.240 --> 01:40:19.240] I did send him the information on the complaint form that is provided online at the Texas Department of Public Safety Office and Spectre General.
[01:40:19.240 --> 01:40:28.240] I emailed him the links, dts.pixas.gov. They actually tell you how to file a complaint. They actually have the complaint forms online.
[01:40:28.240 --> 01:40:34.240] They actually have what they're required to do and what they're not required to do. Very, very informative.
[01:40:34.240 --> 01:40:41.240] However, I will say that when I was filling out the complaint form, they make it to work. It doesn't quite work.
[01:40:41.240 --> 01:40:44.240] And you have to cut and paste if you want to go more than one page.
[01:40:44.240 --> 01:40:49.240] I've made that into a word format. So that has to...
[01:40:49.240 --> 01:40:51.240] Who was your complaint against?
[01:40:51.240 --> 01:40:59.240] I had two department officials, the DPS agents at the DMZ. They're the ones that arrested the rest.
[01:40:59.240 --> 01:41:05.240] Right. And see, here's the problem of what they've got posted on their website versus the laws that govern their actions.
[01:41:05.240 --> 01:41:19.240] Texas Administrative Code says that the Department of Public Safety may not investigate any public official without express approval by the director of the Department of Public Safety.
[01:41:19.240 --> 01:41:21.240] Wow. So they can...
[01:41:21.240 --> 01:41:26.240] That is in the Administrative Code under Title 37.
[01:41:26.240 --> 01:41:30.240] So they're really protecting themselves in the sense that there's what I mean?
[01:41:30.240 --> 01:41:32.240] Absolutely.
[01:41:32.240 --> 01:41:38.240] Well, it's all gone. Eddie, what's the citizen... I shouldn't even say the word citizen anymore. What's the...
[01:41:38.240 --> 01:41:47.240] The individuals are to do anymore. It's right here on their web page. And of course, it is a little contradictory, but I will let you know too, though, that...
[01:41:47.240 --> 01:41:52.240] Well, we're going to have to resort to an oldie but goodie. God bless and pass the ammo.
[01:41:52.240 --> 01:41:54.240] Cool. Well, amen to that.
[01:41:54.240 --> 01:42:00.240] We'll see what happens. Like I said, there... Yeah, it seems like a good old boy network now that's kind of what's going to go on.
[01:42:00.240 --> 01:42:08.240] They'll kind of open it up and go talk to the guys, I'm sure, and pass it off as just a...
[01:42:08.240 --> 01:42:21.240] A lot better place to do the filing is with the grand jury.
[01:42:21.240 --> 01:42:28.240] Okay. Well, I'm going to just do that after I get back to your response from them, then, because now this is open up a...
[01:42:28.240 --> 01:42:35.240] This really irritates me. I'm going to tell you that right now because the website specifically says that they will do all this,
[01:42:35.240 --> 01:42:43.240] but right now, I'm not just screaming with what you guys are saying, but a person without having legal knowledge would not know what to do here,
[01:42:43.240 --> 01:42:48.240] and that would you just let things fall... You're absolutely right. It's the reason we fill that gap.
[01:42:48.240 --> 01:42:56.240] And that's why I keep telling folks, hey, we provide a service whether you realize it or not, so keeping us on the air with donations,
[01:42:56.240 --> 01:43:01.240] hey, that's necessary because you're right. The average Joe will not know.
[01:43:01.240 --> 01:43:08.240] I'm going to tell you that now, Eddie, and Radio. I am broke, beyond broke, but I'm going to send in $5 and all that's got a lot of money,
[01:43:08.240 --> 01:43:11.240] but I won't tell you all the history of...
[01:43:11.240 --> 01:43:14.240] Hey, it's $5 we didn't have, so we can't complain.
[01:43:14.240 --> 01:43:15.240] Yes, sir.
[01:43:15.240 --> 01:43:18.240] Hey, that's two beers.
[01:43:18.240 --> 01:43:20.240] Hey, are we all ready?
[01:43:20.240 --> 01:43:24.240] Not for you, Randy. That's two months.
[01:43:24.240 --> 01:43:30.240] One final question. I used to do computers and all that, but I've got my first smartphone.
[01:43:30.240 --> 01:43:35.240] There's the quick application. You just look that up on the internet and download it to the smartphone.
[01:43:35.240 --> 01:43:36.240] Yes.
[01:43:36.240 --> 01:43:45.240] Yeah, you should be able to get it. If you've got an iPhone, then you can go to the iPhone market and download it for free.
[01:43:45.240 --> 01:43:48.240] Okay, that's an Android, but either way, it's two out of ten.
[01:43:48.240 --> 01:43:52.240] Okay, on Android, the one you need is something different.
[01:43:52.240 --> 01:43:56.240] I'll give that to you when we get back on the other side because it's what I have on my phone.
[01:43:56.240 --> 01:43:59.240] Quick is not available for Android yet.
[01:43:59.240 --> 01:44:04.240] Hey, did you hear? Ron Paul has announced he's running for president in 2012.
[01:44:04.240 --> 01:44:05.240] It is Ron Paul's.
[01:44:05.240 --> 01:44:11.240] Really? Okay, put down the cell phone for one minute. Your friends really don't care about your Twitter updates on what you had for breakfast.
[01:44:11.240 --> 01:44:14.240] Oh, but I love to make those little smiley faces with punctuation marks.
[01:44:14.240 --> 01:44:15.240] Of course you do.
[01:44:15.240 --> 01:44:21.240] Now, listen closely. You need to go down to Brave New Books and learn as much as you can about Ron Paul and his message before it's too late.
[01:44:21.240 --> 01:44:23.240] They have all of his books and many of the books he talks about.
[01:44:23.240 --> 01:44:28.240] They also have t-shirts, bumper stickers, and yard signs so that you can show your support for him during the campaign.
[01:44:28.240 --> 01:44:31.240] Brave New Books? Do they have Harry Potter and Twilight?
[01:44:31.240 --> 01:44:37.240] No, but they do carry a large selection of survival and preparedness books to protect your family in time of emergency.
[01:44:37.240 --> 01:44:40.240] Ugh, that sounds like that show on the Discovery Channel.
[01:44:40.240 --> 01:44:47.240] Yeah, there's even a wilderness survival expert that teaches classes called Earthskill School that you can sign up for on the website BraveNewBookStore.com.
[01:44:47.240 --> 01:44:48.240] What are you doing?
[01:44:48.240 --> 01:44:54.240] I'm tweeting all my friends that they should go to BraveNewBookStore.com or down to the bookstore in person. Where's it located?
[01:44:54.240 --> 01:44:56.240] 1904, Guadalupe Street.
[01:44:56.240 --> 01:44:58.240] There, it's set. I even made a smiley face.
[01:44:58.240 --> 01:45:00.240] Great.
[01:45:00.240 --> 01:45:04.240] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.240 --> 01:45:08.240] Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary.
[01:45:08.240 --> 01:45:15.240] The affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.240 --> 01:45:19.240] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.240 --> 01:45:23.240] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.240 --> 01:45:28.240] Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.240 --> 01:45:34.240] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:34.240 --> 01:45:43.240] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.240 --> 01:45:52.240] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.240 --> 01:46:01.240] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.240 --> 01:46:37.240] Alright folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio.
[01:46:37.240 --> 01:46:42.240] All in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:46:42.240 --> 01:46:49.240] We are in our last segment for the first two hours, and we'll pick up two hours after that.
[01:46:49.240 --> 01:46:54.240] Alright, so please get in line. Don't wait for the last minute to get on the line with us.
[01:46:54.240 --> 01:46:58.240] Alright, who are we talking to? Rich or Woody?
[01:46:58.240 --> 01:46:59.240] Woody.
[01:46:59.240 --> 01:47:01.240] Woody, okay.
[01:47:01.240 --> 01:47:03.240] Alright Woody, let's go ahead.
[01:47:03.240 --> 01:47:10.240] Anyway, what we're saying before we went to break is, Quick used to not have an Android version of the app.
[01:47:10.240 --> 01:47:17.240] Now it appears that they do because it's showing that, for instance, my HTC phone is supported now.
[01:47:17.240 --> 01:47:24.240] Even though it was not before, or at least some HTC phones are, mine's still not on here.
[01:47:24.240 --> 01:47:34.240] So, just go, you can go log in at the qik.com website, set you up an account, download the app, and put it on your phone.
[01:47:34.240 --> 01:47:39.240] Alright, will do. I should appreciate it and everything.
[01:47:39.240 --> 01:47:44.240] Do I go to the website to make the donation, by the way, using a debit card, or how does that work?
[01:47:44.240 --> 01:47:49.240] Yeah, you can go to the rule of law website and donate there through,
[01:47:49.240 --> 01:47:54.240] I think the donations are set up and working on logos, yes.
[01:47:54.240 --> 01:47:56.240] Either way, I'll take it both out, okay.
[01:47:56.240 --> 01:47:57.240] Alright.
[01:47:57.240 --> 01:48:00.240] Alright guys, face again, keep up the good work, good evening.
[01:48:00.240 --> 01:48:03.240] Thanks, you too.
[01:48:03.240 --> 01:48:10.240] Alright, okay, now we're going to Jeff in Mississippi.
[01:48:10.240 --> 01:48:12.240] Jeff, what can we do for you?
[01:48:12.240 --> 01:48:14.240] Yeah, can y'all hear me?
[01:48:14.240 --> 01:48:15.240] Yes, we can.
[01:48:15.240 --> 01:48:18.240] Oh, okay. Hi Eddie and hi Randy.
[01:48:18.240 --> 01:48:21.240] I've called in, I think this is my fourth time.
[01:48:21.240 --> 01:48:26.240] I was the fellow that was arrested at Mississippi State University for having a hunting rifle,
[01:48:26.240 --> 01:48:31.240] and I've called into the show a few times over about the last year.
[01:48:31.240 --> 01:48:33.240] I remember you.
[01:48:33.240 --> 01:48:35.240] Yeah, the one with the dorm room problem.
[01:48:35.240 --> 01:48:36.240] Yes.
[01:48:36.240 --> 01:48:39.240] Well, they actually had me in some apartments off campus.
[01:48:39.240 --> 01:48:43.240] Well, they were saying that it was part of the college campus when it isn't.
[01:48:43.240 --> 01:48:44.240] Yeah.
[01:48:44.240 --> 01:48:45.240] Okay.
[01:48:45.240 --> 01:48:53.240] So I had my case, and I went in, I studied up quite a bit, and I loved listening to Ralph,
[01:48:53.240 --> 01:48:57.240] because mine was almost word for word what happened to me.
[01:48:57.240 --> 01:49:02.240] I went in and challenged jurisdiction, I did a whole bunch of stuff,
[01:49:02.240 --> 01:49:06.240] and they completely ran over me like a train.
[01:49:06.240 --> 01:49:09.240] And yet you like what Ralph said.
[01:49:09.240 --> 01:49:13.240] Well, I just, I was right there with him almost word for word.
[01:49:13.240 --> 01:49:16.240] I feel like I'm about three months ahead of Ralph.
[01:49:16.240 --> 01:49:20.240] But I went in and just got my nose broken.
[01:49:20.240 --> 01:49:24.240] But I hung in there, I slugged it out with him for two days.
[01:49:24.240 --> 01:49:28.240] They arrested me, they threw me in jail for three days.
[01:49:28.240 --> 01:49:31.240] But I had a two day court battle with him.
[01:49:31.240 --> 01:49:36.240] And like I said, I objected subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:49:36.240 --> 01:49:37.240] I did a lot of stuff.
[01:49:37.240 --> 01:49:41.240] I even did one thing that you told me not to do, and that was the commercial.
[01:49:41.240 --> 01:49:43.240] I think it was UCC.
[01:49:43.240 --> 01:49:44.240] Uh-huh.
[01:49:44.240 --> 01:49:46.240] You told me to stay away from that.
[01:49:46.240 --> 01:49:50.240] And I had challenged on the UCC 1-308.
[01:49:50.240 --> 01:49:51.240] It didn't matter.
[01:49:51.240 --> 01:49:54.240] They rolled right over me just like an armored car.
[01:49:54.240 --> 01:49:56.240] Well, you know why they do that, right?
[01:49:56.240 --> 01:49:58.240] No, I don't.
[01:49:58.240 --> 01:50:04.240] Okay, they do that because the moment you opened your mouth and started going with that clap trap,
[01:50:04.240 --> 01:50:09.240] they knew that they had somebody in their sights that didn't have a clue what was being done to him.
[01:50:09.240 --> 01:50:10.240] Okay.
[01:50:10.240 --> 01:50:15.240] And just like a tank that sees a soldier standing in front of it, waving it to stop,
[01:50:15.240 --> 01:50:19.240] but he's wearing an enemy uniform, they're not stopping.
[01:50:19.240 --> 01:50:23.240] They're going right over the top of him and they ain't holding back for nothing.
[01:50:23.240 --> 01:50:24.240] Why?
[01:50:24.240 --> 01:50:29.240] Because this year, this one guy ain't much of a problem.
[01:50:29.240 --> 01:50:32.240] You've got a point because they rolled right over me.
[01:50:32.240 --> 01:50:37.240] However, at the end of the trial, I did wind up hanging the jury.
[01:50:37.240 --> 01:50:40.240] The jury came back and they said, we're hung.
[01:50:40.240 --> 01:50:42.240] We can't come to a conclusion.
[01:50:42.240 --> 01:50:44.240] And this is what I got them on.
[01:50:44.240 --> 01:50:48.240] So I'm telling all the listeners that I went through a lot of stuff.
[01:50:48.240 --> 01:50:51.240] I objected to the subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:50:51.240 --> 01:50:56.240] Judge basically said I could care less and he just overruled and kept going.
[01:50:56.240 --> 01:50:59.240] Finally, at the end, I held up my indictment.
[01:50:59.240 --> 01:51:04.240] And in my indictment, I got arrested for possession of rifle or weapon on campus,
[01:51:04.240 --> 01:51:08.240] but my indictment said willfully, intently, and feloniously.
[01:51:08.240 --> 01:51:14.240] I looked at the jury and I said, I'm sorry, but I don't understand what feloniously and willfully meant.
[01:51:14.240 --> 01:51:19.240] That means that I smuggled the rifle, you know, knowing that I'm committing a crime.
[01:51:19.240 --> 01:51:23.240] And I just don't understand how the prosecution could even know that.
[01:51:23.240 --> 01:51:27.240] Well, the jury came back and said we don't understand what willful intent
[01:51:27.240 --> 01:51:30.240] and felonious means has anything to do with this case either.
[01:51:30.240 --> 01:51:32.240] So they hung the jury.
[01:51:32.240 --> 01:51:36.240] Now they're going to try to retry me on the 1st of May.
[01:51:36.240 --> 01:51:41.240] Well, I'm pretty convinced that that prosecutor's going to run right in there
[01:51:41.240 --> 01:51:44.240] and have those words taken out or amended somehow.
[01:51:44.240 --> 01:51:48.240] Well, the thing is, is there are certain things they can't remove.
[01:51:48.240 --> 01:51:53.240] If the statute, if those are necessary elements of the charge in accordance with the statute
[01:51:53.240 --> 01:51:59.240] and the way the courts there have ruled that statute must be read and proven,
[01:51:59.240 --> 01:52:01.240] he can't take them out.
[01:52:01.240 --> 01:52:03.240] Oh, okay.
[01:52:03.240 --> 01:52:08.240] He has to have every element required to be proven in the charging instrument.
[01:52:08.240 --> 01:52:14.240] If he doesn't, the charging instrument itself is bad and you can challenge that and get it thrown out.
[01:52:14.240 --> 01:52:16.240] And he's right back to square one again.
[01:52:16.240 --> 01:52:22.240] What he's doing is retrying with a new jury that's going to hopefully not have their eyes open enough
[01:52:22.240 --> 01:52:25.240] to say we don't understand either.
[01:52:25.240 --> 01:52:32.240] And they will play this game up until they're able to get a jury that will convict.
[01:52:32.240 --> 01:52:39.240] Because as long as there's a hung jury, they can keep coming back after you.
[01:52:39.240 --> 01:52:41.240] Okay.
[01:52:41.240 --> 01:52:49.240] The only way that it can end is if you're found guilty and later proven innocent because of double jeopardy
[01:52:49.240 --> 01:52:55.240] or for some other reason you get it kicked out, they can't prosecute you again because of double jeopardy.
[01:52:55.240 --> 01:52:56.240] Okay.
[01:52:56.240 --> 01:53:00.240] Or if you're acquitted, they can't come after you again for double jeopardy.
[01:53:00.240 --> 01:53:06.240] Or last option, they dismiss after jeopardy attaches,
[01:53:06.240 --> 01:53:11.240] which means they file the complaint, they file the indictment.
[01:53:11.240 --> 01:53:14.240] At that moment, jeopardy attaches.
[01:53:14.240 --> 01:53:22.240] And if they dismiss the case or have to in any way relinquish control of it to try again later,
[01:53:22.240 --> 01:53:25.240] then you have a double jeopardy claim against them at that point.
[01:53:25.240 --> 01:53:26.240] Oh.
[01:53:26.240 --> 01:53:33.240] Once jeopardy attaches and they dismiss for any reason, they're done.
[01:53:33.240 --> 01:53:35.240] Okay.
[01:53:35.240 --> 01:53:40.240] So those are the three ways that double jeopardy can come into play.
[01:53:40.240 --> 01:53:44.240] You can win and get it overturned on a technicality.
[01:53:44.240 --> 01:53:49.240] They can't come back because you can win because of an acquittal.
[01:53:49.240 --> 01:53:55.240] They can't come back later for anything, especially for any charges related to the same event.
[01:53:55.240 --> 01:53:57.240] The case also.
[01:53:57.240 --> 01:53:58.240] Go ahead, Randy.
[01:53:58.240 --> 01:54:10.240] You want to look at appealing the denial of subject, the denial of your motion for subject manager restriction.
[01:54:10.240 --> 01:54:11.240] Okay.
[01:54:11.240 --> 01:54:13.240] Or anything else they did wrong.
[01:54:13.240 --> 01:54:15.240] You should look at appealing this.
[01:54:15.240 --> 01:54:16.240] Okay.
[01:54:16.240 --> 01:54:17.240] Yeah.
[01:54:17.240 --> 01:54:21.240] He struck that in court and I objected and he just said overrule.
[01:54:21.240 --> 01:54:29.240] You petition for findings of fact and conclusions at law and when he doesn't produce it, then you file against him directly.
[01:54:29.240 --> 01:54:32.240] Make sure you file a bar grievance and judicial conduct complaint.
[01:54:32.240 --> 01:54:33.240] Okay.
[01:54:33.240 --> 01:54:35.240] Make him work for it.
[01:54:35.240 --> 01:54:37.240] What court level court was this?
[01:54:37.240 --> 01:54:41.240] This is called a circuit court.
[01:54:41.240 --> 01:54:44.240] It's at the county courthouse, but it's called a circuit court.
[01:54:44.240 --> 01:54:48.240] What was the level of the accusation?
[01:54:48.240 --> 01:54:49.240] Was it a felony?
[01:54:49.240 --> 01:54:50.240] What class of offense?
[01:54:50.240 --> 01:54:52.240] It's a felony, yes.
[01:54:52.240 --> 01:54:53.240] Okay.
[01:54:53.240 --> 01:54:55.240] Then there has to be an indictment.
[01:54:55.240 --> 01:54:58.240] That means the prosecutor can't change it.
[01:54:58.240 --> 01:55:00.240] Oh, really?
[01:55:00.240 --> 01:55:02.240] That's right.
[01:55:02.240 --> 01:55:04.240] Okay.
[01:55:04.240 --> 01:55:17.240] You might look at, okay, we'll have to look more deeply, but demand findings of fact and conclusions at law for all of the decisions that the judge made.
[01:55:17.240 --> 01:55:18.240] Okay.
[01:55:18.240 --> 01:55:24.240] And when he refuses to give it, we'll go ahead and file a judicial conduct complaint against him.
[01:55:24.240 --> 01:55:25.240] Okay.
[01:55:25.240 --> 01:55:29.240] And a bar grievance against the attorneys.
[01:55:29.240 --> 01:55:33.240] Probably should have done that before you got to court.
[01:55:33.240 --> 01:55:39.240] Bar basically your own attorney who should have known better or did you take an attorney?
[01:55:39.240 --> 01:55:42.240] Yes, I had a public defender.
[01:55:42.240 --> 01:55:43.240] What did he do?
[01:55:43.240 --> 01:55:45.240] Did he let you get up there with that stuff?
[01:55:45.240 --> 01:56:05.240] No, no, my public defender, and I don't want to extend the story too long to disrupt other callers, but my public defender had taken me into a back room over the course of this year and a half and said that they were going to bring me up on sniper charges and that I had murdered somebody if I didn't plead guilty.
[01:56:05.240 --> 01:56:16.240] Okay, you need to file obstruction of justice against your lawyer and a bar grievance and look at a malpractice suit against him.
[01:56:16.240 --> 01:56:18.240] Okay.
[01:56:18.240 --> 01:56:23.240] That's absolutely outrageous.
[01:56:23.240 --> 01:56:29.240] Yes, and I actually have that on recording too because Eddie told me to do so.
[01:56:29.240 --> 01:56:32.240] Yes, you don't ever go talk to them guys without one.
[01:56:32.240 --> 01:56:35.240] And I'll be more than happy to talk.
[01:56:35.240 --> 01:56:46.240] Okay, grieve him for that and then when he attempts to be removed from the case, you object to his removal.
[01:56:46.240 --> 01:56:49.240] If, okay, what state are you in?
[01:56:49.240 --> 01:56:56.240] I'm in Mississippi and I actually fired him in the middle of the courtroom.
[01:56:56.240 --> 01:57:08.240] I demand that they appoint you counsel again and go ahead and bar grieve him, file a malpractice suit against him for ineffective assistance of counsel.
[01:57:08.240 --> 01:57:09.240] Right.
[01:57:09.240 --> 01:57:15.240] And then let your new one know, you failed to do your job, I do the same to you.
[01:57:15.240 --> 01:57:16.240] All right.
[01:57:16.240 --> 01:57:22.240] And put him in a position to where they have to protect your attorney against you.
[01:57:22.240 --> 01:57:32.240] In Texas, in a criminal matter, a defense counsel cannot ask to be removed.
[01:57:32.240 --> 01:57:38.240] If he asks, that gets a bar grievance.
[01:57:38.240 --> 01:57:43.240] And if the judge grants it, then you've been denied counsel.
[01:57:43.240 --> 01:57:47.240] And you could also claim in this one that you were denied counsel.
[01:57:47.240 --> 01:57:48.240] Okay.
[01:57:48.240 --> 01:57:54.240] In fact, if it's effective assistance of counsel, you're on attorney telling you that they're going to fake charges if you don't plead.
[01:57:54.240 --> 01:57:55.240] Yes.
[01:57:55.240 --> 01:57:58.240] I mean, that's cooperating with the enemy big time.
[01:57:58.240 --> 01:57:59.240] Yes.
[01:57:59.240 --> 01:58:04.240] And I told that to the courtroom and to the entire jury and the judge just overruled it.
[01:58:04.240 --> 01:58:07.240] Like I said, they ran over me like a pack.
[01:58:07.240 --> 01:58:08.240] Yeah.
[01:58:08.240 --> 01:58:10.240] So go after the judge.
[01:58:10.240 --> 01:58:11.240] Okay.
[01:58:11.240 --> 01:58:14.240] They're not used to somebody coming after him.
[01:58:14.240 --> 01:58:16.240] Oh, I actually feel so.
[01:58:16.240 --> 01:58:17.240] Okay.
[01:58:17.240 --> 01:58:18.240] Hang on.
[01:58:18.240 --> 01:58:19.240] We're going to break.
[01:58:19.240 --> 01:58:20.240] We'll pick you up on the other side.
[01:58:20.240 --> 01:58:21.240] All right.
[01:58:21.240 --> 01:58:22.240] Okay.
[01:58:22.240 --> 01:58:23.240] All right, folks.
[01:58:23.240 --> 01:58:25.240] This is rule of law radio.
[01:58:25.240 --> 01:58:28.240] Call in number 512-646-984.
[01:58:28.240 --> 01:58:30.240] This is our top of the hour break.
[01:58:30.240 --> 01:58:32.240] So we'll be back in about four minutes.
[01:58:32.240 --> 01:58:34.240] So get in line.
[01:58:34.240 --> 01:58:36.240] Jeff is our last caller.
[01:58:36.240 --> 01:58:37.240] So we'll talk to you.
[01:58:37.240 --> 01:58:41.240] Come on, folks.
[01:58:41.240 --> 01:58:46.240] I don't want to have to listen to me and Eddie for two hours, do ya?
[01:58:46.240 --> 01:58:47.240] Not almost not.
[01:58:47.240 --> 01:58:48.240] We'll be right back.
[01:58:48.240 --> 01:58:49.240] Okay.
[01:58:49.240 --> 01:58:50.240] I think we're out.
[01:58:50.240 --> 01:59:01.240] I hope we're out.
[01:59:01.240 --> 01:59:07.480] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:59:07.480 --> 01:59:08.480] Recovery Version.
[01:59:08.480 --> 01:59:13.640] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:13.640 --> 01:59:19.280] says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:19.280 --> 01:59:22.600] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:22.600 --> 01:59:31.600] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:31.600 --> 01:59:37.120] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:59:37.120 --> 01:59:41.160] charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:41.160 --> 01:59:43.720] This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:43.720 --> 01:59:52.040] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:52.040 --> 02:00:10.360] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.