ROL_2012-04-02_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  In 1946, Felix Ghulja answered his doorbell and was shot in the chest and killed.
[00:06.000 --> 00:12.000]  The case has finally been solved 65 years later with the confession of a 96-year-old woman.
[00:12.000 --> 00:16.000]  It's quite a story. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. Stay tuned for more.
[00:16.000 --> 00:22.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:27.000 --> 00:32.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:35.000 --> 00:39.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[00:39.000 --> 00:43.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:43.000 --> 00:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[00:46.000 --> 00:51.000]  Adi Visser was part of the resistance when the Nazis occupied Holland in World War II.
[00:51.000 --> 00:56.000]  She took a gun and doled out vigilante justice to a guy named Felix Ghulja,
[00:56.000 --> 01:00.000]  a Dutch businessman and Nazi sympathizer who did business with the enemy.
[01:00.000 --> 01:05.000]  Trouble is, Ghulja was actually doing what Oscar Schindler did in the movie Schindler's List.
[01:05.000 --> 01:10.000]  While pretending to support the Nazis, he was actually sheltering Jews and helping them to safety.
[01:10.000 --> 01:16.000]  Adi discovered her mistake after the murder and carried the tragic secret 65 years.
[01:16.000 --> 01:20.000]  Her conscience finally got the better of her and at age 96 she confessed.
[01:20.000 --> 01:25.000]  The moral? Things aren't always what they seem, so think before you shoot.
[01:25.000 --> 01:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:30.000 --> 01:34.000]  The latest trend in footwear is the barefoot shoe.
[01:34.000 --> 01:39.000]  While it may seem like an oxymoron, people are spending hard-earned money on special shoes
[01:39.000 --> 01:43.000]  so they can feel like they're walking barefoot. Sound crazy?
[01:43.000 --> 01:46.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment to explain.
[01:46.000 --> 01:52.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:52.000 --> 01:57.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:57.000 --> 02:02.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:02.000 --> 02:05.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:05.000 --> 02:08.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com.
[02:08.000 --> 02:12.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[02:12.000 --> 02:16.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:16.000 --> 02:18.000]  Fabulous fitness or just a fad?
[02:18.000 --> 02:22.000]  Shoes with wafer-thin rubber soles make it feel like you're barefoot.
[02:22.000 --> 02:27.000]  Advocates say they use the body's natural biomechanics to strengthen muscles and improve posture.
[02:27.000 --> 02:35.000]  Whatever they do, they're a far cry from the art support and shock absorption the footwear industry has spent decades telling us we need.
[02:35.000 --> 02:39.000]  So which is better, high-tech enhancement or the foot as nature intended?
[02:39.000 --> 02:47.000]  Promoters say barefoot is best, pointing out that Kalahari Bushmen run barefoot for hours in the desert chasing antelopes till the animals die.
[02:47.000 --> 02:52.000]  But if we really wanted to follow their lead, wouldn't we just dump the pricey footwear altogether?
[02:52.000 --> 02:54.000]  Hey, if the shoe fits.
[02:54.000 --> 03:01.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:01.000 --> 03:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com
[03:31.000 --> 03:49.000]  Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do? Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:49.000 --> 03:57.000]  When you were eight and you had bad traits, you'd go to school and learn to go and then lose. So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[03:57.000 --> 04:04.000]  Hi folks, good evening. This is Rule of Law Radio. This is the Monday Night Traffic Show.
[04:04.000 --> 04:09.000]  We host Eddie Craig. It is April 2nd, 2012. We are live tonight.
[04:09.000 --> 04:19.000]  Okay, in class yesterday I was going over some of the things that we're trying to change in the seminar material and why the updates have still not gone out yet.
[04:19.000 --> 04:32.000]  We are trying to make all of these documents where they are set up to be appeal ready. That means that all the documents that are required to have the format to be filed on appeal,
[04:32.000 --> 04:42.000]  all of our filings in the trial court will already be formatted in that way. They'll have a table of contents. They'll have tables of authorities and so on and so forth.
[04:42.000 --> 04:51.000]  So that the documents can be reviewed by the appellate court as is without any changes or modifications by anybody.
[04:51.000 --> 05:03.000]  We've got all of our particular references already set up. They don't have to go through the steps to find where to look up or through the document to find where we've referenced a particular statute and made an argument.
[05:03.000 --> 05:09.000]  They'll be able to go through the table of contents like they would in any other appellate brief and so on and so forth.
[05:09.000 --> 05:26.000]  Hopefully that will be able to expedite the pathway of the paperwork through the system and it will also lend an air of more lawyer like ability to it than just prosay ability to it.
[05:26.000 --> 05:40.000]  What that means for you guys out there listening is this. You're going to have to get familiar with how Microsoft Word really works when it comes to tables of contents and tables of authorities.
[05:40.000 --> 05:56.000]  It's not that hard to figure out. So all you got to do is turn on the system where you can view the markups in the document meaning like paragraph headers and things of that nature.
[05:56.000 --> 06:05.000]  That will allow you to directly view the structure of the markups for citations and table of authorities and so on and so forth.
[06:05.000 --> 06:11.000]  Then you can copy and paste and edit accordingly when you need to make a new reference to a particular table.
[06:11.000 --> 06:16.000]  Again, there are plenty of videos that I've downloaded.
[06:16.000 --> 06:34.000]  I've downloaded a ton of PDF documents, Word documents and videos and integrated those into the resources of the seminar material that deals specifically with how to utilize these features in Microsoft Word.
[06:34.000 --> 06:40.000]  Microsoft Word for the versions 2003 through 2010.
[06:40.000 --> 06:47.000]  So this will allow you once you get your hands on the seminar material, you'll have the resource available to learn how to do these things.
[06:47.000 --> 06:56.000]  Otherwise, you're going to need to go out on the Internet or whatever means you have available to you to look up how to utilize these features.
[06:56.000 --> 07:08.000]  Now that being said, hopefully we're going to have a whole revamp of the documents to such a degree that we can minimize the number.
[07:08.000 --> 07:14.000]  But here's our problem with the number of documents that are going to be in this.
[07:14.000 --> 07:32.000]  For those of you that have put any time and effort into the study of the code of criminal procedure, as I have knows that there is a plethora of screw ups and due process violations and violations of the rules of procedure and so on and so forth.
[07:32.000 --> 07:39.000]  That the trial courts are constantly and always failing to do.
[07:39.000 --> 07:48.000]  So there's no such thing as a three or four document filing. Why? Because we want to document everything they're doing wrong.
[07:48.000 --> 07:56.000]  We can't put it all in one document. If we did, the document would be so large no one would ever read it.
[07:56.000 --> 08:08.000]  So I'm saving the gathering of all these particular issues into the second book I'm working on for the traffic court survivors guide.
[08:08.000 --> 08:23.000]  But the issues this gives us is that we have to create a document to file for everything that they're violating in the right of due process and in the statutes.
[08:23.000 --> 08:40.000]  If they violate 45.018b, for instance, the right to notice, we have to have a motion to dismiss based entirely on lack of notice, which of course directly addresses several issues at once as a necessity.
[08:40.000 --> 08:45.000]  Failure to file a proper charging instrument, for instance, would constitute no notice.
[08:45.000 --> 08:57.000]  Failing to file a proper complaint constitutes no notice. All of these ties into the notice issue, but in and of themselves, they are also separate issues.
[08:57.000 --> 09:05.000]  We don't go into the argument of why the complaint is invalid in the notice motion.
[09:05.000 --> 09:17.000]  We have to go into a separate motion asking to quash the complaint or quash the information because of problems that it has inherent to itself.
[09:17.000 --> 09:32.000]  So as you can see, we can address certain aspects of any particular violation in one document, but then we have to address other aspects in other documents or we keep getting huge documents.
[09:32.000 --> 09:44.000]  So for those of you out there that are wondering why you haven't gotten updates, come live in my world for a little while trying to figure out how to get all these arguments broken into the individual documents they need,
[09:44.000 --> 09:58.000]  how to make them intelligently, how to write them in such a way that courts will actually pay attention to them at some level, even though we know they're not going to do it at the trial level, please feel free.
[09:58.000 --> 10:07.000]  Okay, everybody is sending me constant emails. Where's the updates? Where's the updates? They're not ready yet. I'm telling you why they're not ready yet.
[10:07.000 --> 10:17.000]  Because every time we start making this stuff adaptable in one way, we find out that a particular piece of paperwork isn't working.
[10:17.000 --> 10:23.000]  The courts are ignoring it for a particular reason. It means we have to backtrack and go back and revamp that document.
[10:23.000 --> 10:39.000]  We're back to square one on a document we thought we had completed. So what we're trying to do is find a way to make this where once we get them set, unless the appeals court goes and changes the way it wants documents delivered,
[10:39.000 --> 10:51.000]  we don't have to worry about how the other courts are treating it anymore because if it's the way the appellate court wants it, the lower court can't say we won't accept it or we won't do it because.
[10:51.000 --> 11:01.000]  The only thing they can do is make us comply with the local rules as long as the local rules don't violate statute and they don't violate due process.
[11:01.000 --> 11:11.000]  If they do, then we have the right to ignore them. But we have to document that failing of the local rule in another document.
[11:11.000 --> 11:25.000]  You see the problem? It's a cycle that doesn't seem to end because as we progress getting through this, we encounter more issues with the way particular courts are doing things.
[11:25.000 --> 11:36.000]  And it's not every court. A document may work fine in this court but not work fine in that court because the judge over there is excessively stupid, not just criminally stupid.
[11:36.000 --> 11:43.000]  So now we've got to rewrite the document to deal with both excessively stupid and criminally stupid.
[11:43.000 --> 11:56.000]  All right. So again, it puts us back into a kind of a let's go back and review stage at every now and then at some point when we have that issue crop up.
[11:56.000 --> 12:08.000]  So please folks, I'm begging you, be patient. This is not just to sit down and write it out. If it was, then you folks should be learning to do this and I shouldn't have to write these documents.
[12:08.000 --> 12:23.000]  But I chose to sit down and do this so that you would at least have coherent examples to go by so that you didn't have to start from ground zero like I did learning this.
[12:23.000 --> 12:29.000]  You wanted help. Well, that's what I've tried to do is provide you with help.
[12:29.000 --> 12:36.000]  But the problem is I found out that most people don't want help. They simply want you to do it for them.
[12:36.000 --> 12:45.000]  So instead of doing it for yourselves when I give you examples, you instead write me emails asking me how do I do this? How do I do this? How do I do this?
[12:45.000 --> 12:53.000]  So again, that's further delays on what I'm able to sit down and actually accomplish. And don't get me wrong. I'm not complaining.
[12:53.000 --> 13:04.000]  I started this trip down this road for exactly the purpose of helping people solve these problems. But folks, I don't work miracles.
[13:04.000 --> 13:15.000]  I've only got so much brain power and so many hands and so many computers and so many keyboards and mice and screens I can look at and work on simultaneously.
[13:15.000 --> 13:25.000]  So take a little initiative. If you create a new document that you think would have blanket coverage to the way things are working in these courts,
[13:25.000 --> 13:34.000]  instead of making me sit down and write it from scratch, send me a copy of it and say, hey, I wrote this because of this incident,
[13:34.000 --> 13:44.000]  and I wanted you to take a look at it and see, hey, will it benefit the seminar material in any way if we can get this argument put forth?
[13:44.000 --> 13:51.000]  I got no problem with that. I can't guarantee I'll use it. I can't guarantee the length of time it'll take for me to get to it and read it
[13:51.000 --> 13:57.000]  and see whether or not we can integrate it somewhere or whether or not we've dealt with it in other ways in another document.
[13:57.000 --> 14:07.000]  But I'm willing to try. These documents were made as examples for you folks.
[14:07.000 --> 14:17.000]  Do not sit back and rely on the updates in the seminar material to do what you need to do to file your arguments for court.
[14:17.000 --> 14:25.000]  Just don't do that. There has to be some motivation on your part to learn how to do this without us.
[14:25.000 --> 14:32.000]  Where would you guys be if we weren't around? If something happened to us tomorrow and no more updates were forthcoming,
[14:32.000 --> 14:35.000]  what are you going to do with the documents you've got?
[14:35.000 --> 14:42.000]  Never change them or edit them as necessary to accommodate what you learned.
[14:42.000 --> 14:50.000]  That's exactly the reason why I asked everybody, when you get these documents, sit down and start reading through them.
[14:50.000 --> 14:56.000]  Just sit down and read them. Get familiar with the arguments. Get familiar with the issues.
[14:56.000 --> 15:02.000]  These are absolutely necessary to your success.
[15:02.000 --> 15:10.000]  Okay? You can't just keep throwing emails at me saying, will you give me updates? Will you give me updates?
[15:10.000 --> 15:15.000]  I will give them as I'm able. I promise.
[15:15.000 --> 15:21.000]  But as I've explained, this is a very hectic process to have to go through day in and day out.
[15:21.000 --> 15:27.000]  I'm the only one that works on these documents. Okay? I'm the only one.
[15:27.000 --> 15:33.000]  And if you've taken a look at the seminar material, you know it ain't just a couple of them.
[15:33.000 --> 15:36.000]  I've had to write every one of these from scratch.
[15:36.000 --> 15:42.000]  I have to go back and redo every one of these whenever we find that we need to make an adjustment.
[15:42.000 --> 15:49.000]  Because just like the argument a moment ago about where there are different angles you have to take an issue from,
[15:49.000 --> 15:52.000]  the same thing occurs with updates.
[15:52.000 --> 15:59.000]  When you put an update into a particular document, that cascades over into other related documents.
[15:59.000 --> 16:04.000]  So I don't have one update to make. I have multiple updates to make.
[16:04.000 --> 16:11.000]  And I have to facilitate the arguments for those updates into the structure of that particular document.
[16:11.000 --> 16:17.000]  Again, not something to sit down and just say, do this, do this, it's not that simple.
[16:17.000 --> 16:21.000]  And I don't want to sound like I'm complaining. This is the job I chose to do.
[16:21.000 --> 16:28.000]  I'm just asking for you guys to be patient. I don't. I do wish I could do it faster.
[16:28.000 --> 16:32.000]  But I don't have a lifetime of experience doing this like attorneys do.
[16:32.000 --> 16:37.000]  I'm learning this process on the way through just like you are.
[16:37.000 --> 16:42.000]  Alright folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. Dale, I see you there on the board.
[16:42.000 --> 16:50.000]  Folks, give us a call 512-646-1984 if you have any questions or traffic issues or things of that nature.
[16:50.000 --> 16:57.000]  This is Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio. We will be right back after the break.
[16:57.000 --> 17:02.000]  America is in trouble.
[17:02.000 --> 17:04.000]  Washington is a disgrace.
[17:04.000 --> 17:09.000]  Government has become too big. It's over-taxing, over-spending. We need to change direction.
[17:09.000 --> 17:10.000]  We really need change.
[17:10.000 --> 17:13.000]  We can't afford to make the same mistakes we've made in the past.
[17:13.000 --> 17:15.000]  Mitt Romney's reputation as a flip-flopper.
[17:15.000 --> 17:18.000]  He went the other way when he got paid to go the other way.
[17:18.000 --> 17:20.000]  There is need for economic stimulus.
[17:20.000 --> 17:22.000]  It's about serial hypocrisy.
[17:22.000 --> 17:27.000]  This election is about trust. There's been one true consistent candidate, and that's Dr. Ron Paul.
[17:27.000 --> 17:30.000]  Ron Paul has been so consistent from the very beginning.
[17:30.000 --> 17:32.000]  He seems like a more honest candidate.
[17:32.000 --> 17:35.000]  He tells the truth about what he believes, whether you like it or not.
[17:35.000 --> 17:40.000]  He's never once voted for a tax increase, never once voted for an unbalanced budget.
[17:40.000 --> 17:44.000]  Ron Paul's plan is bold, cut five departments. It's what we need.
[17:44.000 --> 17:48.000]  When he says he's going to cut a trillion dollars in the first year, I believe it.
[17:48.000 --> 17:53.000]  I don't like how things are going. He's tired of politicians. He's something different.
[17:53.000 --> 17:54.000]  Ron Paul.
[17:54.000 --> 17:55.000]  Ron Paul.
[17:55.000 --> 17:56.000]  Ron Paul.
[17:56.000 --> 17:57.000]  Ron Paul.
[17:57.000 --> 17:58.000]  Is the one we've been looking for.
[17:58.000 --> 18:01.000]  I'm Ron Paul, and I approve this message.
[18:01.000 --> 18:06.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:06.000 --> 18:10.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Merris Proven Method.
[18:10.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Merris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons. How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:27.000 --> 18:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:47.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner,
[18:47.000 --> 18:50.000]  or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 19:12.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[19:12.000 --> 19:35.000]  Hi folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio.
[19:35.000 --> 19:42.000]  Right now we have a couple of callers up on the board. Call in number is 512-646-1984.
[19:42.000 --> 19:47.000]  Now's the time to get in line. Please don't wait until we're down to the last half hour or 15 minutes of the show
[19:47.000 --> 19:51.000]  and start piling up on the caller board because I will not be able to get you all.
[19:51.000 --> 19:56.000]  So if you've got an issue, please get in line now. Let's get started.
[19:56.000 --> 19:59.000]  Alright, Dale, North Carolina, what can we do for you?
[19:59.000 --> 20:04.000]  Hi, Eddie. I found your guy's show and I love it. It's great information. Thank you for what you're doing.
[20:04.000 --> 20:06.000]  Well, thank you for listening.
[20:06.000 --> 20:10.000]  Is Deborah, can I ask her a question? Is she around?
[20:10.000 --> 20:11.000]  Yeah, I'm here.
[20:11.000 --> 20:12.000]  Yes, she is.
[20:12.000 --> 20:17.000]  Okay. Thanks, thanks. You had my Merris on two or three weeks ago.
[20:17.000 --> 20:18.000]  Uh-huh.
[20:18.000 --> 20:23.000]  And you said something that was amazing to me. I didn't know if it existed.
[20:23.000 --> 20:37.000]  You said that the creditor must mark in dispute in your report that in dispute by a subscriber and they cannot put in dispute by a consumer.
[20:37.000 --> 20:41.000]  I did not know that was the case and I'm glad it is.
[20:41.000 --> 20:56.000]  Well, yes, if you dispute with the creditor, then they are required under the FCRA to mark the account in dispute marked by a subscriber on your credit report.
[20:56.000 --> 21:04.000]  Now, if you dispute with the credit agency directly, then they can put marked by a subscriber.
[21:04.000 --> 21:16.000]  Generally, what happens is you're going to want to send a dispute letter to both the creditor and then you wait until you get that certified green card back.
[21:16.000 --> 21:22.000]  And generally, I'll wait and see what happens with that if they send another letter or something like that.
[21:22.000 --> 21:41.000]  But in the meantime, you also dispute with the credit bureau. And so the reason that it comes out most of the time on people's credit reports marked a dispute by a consumer is because the creditor never marks it in dispute.
[21:41.000 --> 21:55.000]  And so the only, as far as the credit agency is concerned, the credit bureau, they just go off of your dispute and so the credit bureau will mark it in dispute by consumer instead of by subscriber.
[21:55.000 --> 22:06.000]  But if it doesn't show up marked, disputed, marked by subscriber, then they violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
[22:06.000 --> 22:09.000]  Understood. That's very good. I didn't know that.
[22:09.000 --> 22:14.000]  And I'm glad because now I've got a call to action it looks like.
[22:14.000 --> 22:18.000]  Do you have the Mike Mears method right now?
[22:18.000 --> 22:19.000]  Excuse me, ma'am.
[22:19.000 --> 22:22.000]  I said, do you have the Mike Mears method? Did you buy his course?
[22:22.000 --> 22:28.000]  No, I did not. I was thinking I may end up having to get it. I know a little about this stuff.
[22:28.000 --> 22:32.000]  So everybody's got their validations in their disputes.
[22:32.000 --> 22:44.000]  I'm watching the results pile up and I'm seeing one account will say marked in dispute by subscriber and on the next bureau, same account, it will say in dispute by consumer.
[22:44.000 --> 23:01.000]  Yeah, and that's why because we'll see right there they're reporting inaccurate and erroneous information because if you dispute it with the creditor and they actually marked it in dispute as reported by subscriber
[23:01.000 --> 23:10.000]  on one of your credit reports, why didn't they mark it in dispute on the other two if it's the same creditor?
[23:10.000 --> 23:17.000]  You see, so that just shows right there the reporting inaccurate and erroneous information. Does that make sense, Dale?
[23:17.000 --> 23:20.000]  It's very helpful too, and I don't want to take the pain forward.
[23:20.000 --> 23:21.000]  Thank you. Thank you both.
[23:21.000 --> 23:26.000]  All right. Thank you, Dale.
[23:26.000 --> 23:29.000]  All right. We're going to move on.
[23:29.000 --> 23:33.000]  Okay, yeah. Now we've got Dan in Connecticut.
[23:33.000 --> 23:35.000]  Dan, what can we do for you?
[23:35.000 --> 23:42.000]  Hey, I heard your call for solicitation of documents, so I sent you my amended complaint.
[23:42.000 --> 23:49.000]  Actually, technically, it's not amended. It's an original regarding my issue that I called in last week on.
[23:49.000 --> 23:53.000]  Hopefully, you can find some use from it. It should be in your email right about now.
[23:53.000 --> 23:56.000]  Okay. I appreciate that.
[23:56.000 --> 23:57.000]  Yeah.
[23:57.000 --> 24:04.000]  What else you got going on there? You want to give us an update on what you've re-iterate the story that that document is linked to?
[24:04.000 --> 24:13.000]  Yes. My wife was pulled over by State Trooper. There was no probable cause for the stop. She was followed for about three miles.
[24:13.000 --> 24:23.000]  What State Trooper did was pull her over and then try to find out why she pulled her, why she was pulled over after the stop had even occurred.
[24:23.000 --> 24:30.000]  Long story short, the car was towed. I said car, bear in mind, which is property.
[24:30.000 --> 24:35.000]  As a matter of fact, if you read the complaint, the word car and property are used.
[24:35.000 --> 24:39.000]  We do not use the term vehicle because that is not the term that applies.
[24:39.000 --> 24:49.000]  Long story short is we had a very unreasonable set of circumstances related to the record that towed it.
[24:49.000 --> 24:59.000]  Initially, he was saying that the hookup charge would be $111 according to the law right now for non-consensual tows.
[24:59.000 --> 25:03.000]  You're always supposed to charge $88 for that and include two free miles.
[25:03.000 --> 25:12.000]  Initially, he said it was $111. I finally got the fraudulent invoice from him when I actually collected my property on Saturday.
[25:12.000 --> 25:20.000]  He went back down to $88. There was a whole bunch of stuff scribbled out on the invoice using like pen.
[25:20.000 --> 25:25.000]  He never provided a breakdown of a storage fee or anything like that.
[25:25.000 --> 25:31.000]  As a matter of fact, he demanded payment in cash. He did not want a money order.
[25:31.000 --> 25:40.000]  I brought down a money order and I actually called the state cop to go down to supervise the whole thing because I thought he might be trying to pull a scam or something.
[25:40.000 --> 25:50.000]  The cop basically said, oh, well, he wants cash and I said, no, I've got a money order to pay this man because I have my cash to pay the record that I brought down.
[25:50.000 --> 25:55.000]  The cop basically said, well, you've got to give him cash and I said, well, why don't you rest this guy?
[25:55.000 --> 26:01.000]  He's trying to basically rack up useless fees. He's trying to keep the car here.
[26:01.000 --> 26:05.000]  The cop wouldn't arrest him, but I'm going to dispense with that later on.
[26:05.000 --> 26:16.000]  The long story short is because this guy wanted cash instead of a money order, I had to take a really expensive taxi ride in the record back to my town to go get cash.
[26:16.000 --> 26:30.000]  That was a 16-mile drive. I came back. I got cash and I signed the receipt for the car and I put under protest at the bottom just to kind of indicate that this is BS charges.
[26:30.000 --> 26:46.000]  I shouldn't have done it, but the long story short is if you read the complaint that I sent you, I indicated that he was operating in a legal record because I figured, look, if he wants to play in the motor vehicle code, we'll do that all damn day.
[26:46.000 --> 26:56.000]  In the motor vehicle code under here, 14-66, if you want to be a record engaged in these activities, you have to have certain requirements on the record.
[26:56.000 --> 27:02.000]  Specifically, you have to have bar lights that are at least eight feet off the ground indicating the width of the record.
[27:02.000 --> 27:11.000]  I went to the yard that he had. Now, the yard was basically a swamp. There was hardly anything there because it was a motorcycle shop.
[27:11.000 --> 27:23.000]  Neither record that he owned had those bar lights on it. Not only that, a record has to have at least three flares on it. I did not see any flares in storage anywhere.
[27:23.000 --> 27:38.000]  By that, you have to have a fire extinguisher mounted to the side of the record pursuant to 14-66. I didn't see a single fire extinguisher anywhere on either one of his vehicles, and he does have vehicles, by the way, because he's operating in the scheme.
[27:38.000 --> 27:55.000]  That aside, I'm going to leave out the abrasive comments he had for my wife when he called, but I just wanted to see if you had any more input on that from last week and from currently if you have the complaint pulled up.
[27:55.000 --> 28:10.000]  Well, let me see if it's arrived yet it hadn't arrived there just a second ago, but let me see if it has now.
[28:10.000 --> 28:12.000]  All right, it is here.
[28:12.000 --> 28:39.000]  Yes, effectively this is a complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The other thing we discovered recently is that the whole troop that Defendant G. Foster is a part of was involved in a scheme wherein each police officer had incentives to initiate more stops and issue more citations.
[28:39.000 --> 28:46.000]  Now, believe it or not, in Connecticut, it is specifically illegal to have a quota system.
[28:46.000 --> 28:47.000]  Right.
[28:47.000 --> 29:03.000]  Even if you are operating under the whole motor vehicle premise. So we actually did make that allegation in the complaint.
[29:03.000 --> 29:15.000]  All right. Now you have here listed as the Defendant's Officer Jane Doe, a.k.a. Foster.
[29:15.000 --> 29:16.000]  Yes.
[29:16.000 --> 29:17.000]  And Bill's cycle.
[29:17.000 --> 29:25.000]  Yeah, the motorcycle place that towed our car.
[29:25.000 --> 29:33.000]  I was quite surprised to see the layout of the shop because it's practically in a swamp. There are hardly any cars there of any kind.
[29:33.000 --> 29:43.000]  I mean, it was literally a backwards place and I'm going, oh my God, this is like, you know, Podunk, Wisconsin or something.
[29:43.000 --> 29:50.000]  You're using the email competition as the defense or the reason for the suit in this.
[29:50.000 --> 29:51.000]  One of them.
[29:51.000 --> 29:52.000]  Yes.
[29:52.000 --> 29:55.000]  Well, hang on, Dan, we'll be right back after the break. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[29:55.000 --> 30:00.000]  Call in numbers 512646974 and we'll be right back.
[30:00.000 --> 30:07.000]  A noble lie. Oklahoma City, 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[30:07.000 --> 30:11.000]  Based on the damage pattern to the building, but the government seems impossible.
[30:11.000 --> 30:14.000]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[30:14.000 --> 30:18.000]  The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[30:18.000 --> 30:23.000]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[30:23.000 --> 30:27.000]  The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[30:27.000 --> 30:31.000]  Expose the cover up now at anobleye.com.
[30:31.000 --> 30:39.000]  HempUSA.org has a revolutionary wonder food for detoxing the body and rebuilding the immune system.
[30:39.000 --> 30:47.000]  Micro plant powder can help unclog arteries and soften heart valves while removing heavy metals, virus, fungus, bacteria and parasites.
[30:47.000 --> 30:51.000]  Plus, it cleans and purifies the blood, lungs, stomach and colon.
[30:51.000 --> 30:54.000]  Keep your body clean with micro plant powder.
[30:54.000 --> 31:01.000]  Visit us at hempUSA.org or call 908-6912608 today.
[31:01.000 --> 31:06.000]  Attention, listeners. Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books, here with a special announcement
[31:06.000 --> 31:10.000]  according to the Southern Poverty Law Center's new report titled The Year in Hate and Extremism.
[31:10.000 --> 31:16.000]  In the past three years, the number of patriot groups has grown by 755%.
[31:16.000 --> 31:18.000]  Once again, making the list Brave New Books.
[31:18.000 --> 31:24.000]  Also, congratulations to Austin's own ruleoflawradio.com for joining the ranks of the SPLC's favorite patriots.
[31:24.000 --> 31:28.000]  And shout out to Deborah Medina's weak Texans for making the list as well.
[31:28.000 --> 31:33.000]  In order to show our appreciation for helping keep the bookstore on the front lines of the Battle for Liberty,
[31:33.000 --> 31:38.000]  for the whole month of April, mention this ad and we'll take 5% off everything in the store.
[31:38.000 --> 31:42.000]  That's right, you can get 5% off the latest in extremist materials.
[31:42.000 --> 31:48.000]  Here's your Ron Paul Yard signed or shirts, one of the last copies of the Oklahoma City Bombing's final report,
[31:48.000 --> 31:51.000]  or Charlotte Inservey's Deliver Dumbing Down of America.
[31:51.000 --> 31:55.000]  So come on down and help further the rise of the patriot movement.
[31:55.000 --> 31:58.000]  The bookstore is located at 1904 Guadalupe Street.
[31:58.000 --> 32:05.000]  5% discount excludes precious metal sales.
[32:05.000 --> 32:15.000]  I got the warrant, and I gonna solve them to the government them, prosecute them.
[32:15.000 --> 32:18.000]  Okay.
[32:18.000 --> 32:21.000]  Hold on a sec.
[32:21.000 --> 32:26.000]  The Texans are ready for establishment.
[32:26.000 --> 32:30.000]  Texans are ready for de-teens.
[32:30.000 --> 32:31.000]  Hi folks, we are back.
[32:31.000 --> 32:33.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[32:33.000 --> 32:37.000]  Right now, Dan is going to be our current and only caller on the board.
[32:37.000 --> 32:40.000]  Call that number is 512-646-1984.
[32:40.000 --> 32:45.000]  So folks, if you're out there listening, if you have a question, comment, or anything of the sort, give us a call.
[32:45.000 --> 32:48.000]  Alright, let's finish up here with Dan.
[32:48.000 --> 32:50.000]  Okay Dan, please continue.
[32:50.000 --> 32:56.000]  Yeah, I was just wondering if you had any commentary on what I think, because I figured if...
[32:56.000 --> 33:02.000]  Yeah, I'm going through your complaint here and I'm looking at it, and I mean, so far, looks fine.
[33:02.000 --> 33:09.000]  Yeah, because I figured if anything like this happened, that was the way I would structure the complaint.
[33:09.000 --> 33:15.000]  Now, obviously, I was a little prepared just in case anything like this had occurred,
[33:15.000 --> 33:20.000]  and the vehicle that I chose was 42 USC 1983.
[33:20.000 --> 33:34.000]  I mean, and 42 USC 1983 basically has to do with the deprivation of rights or liberties under color of law or statute or custom.
[33:34.000 --> 33:39.000]  Yeah, that's the one thing I would fix is you've got everything in here under color of statute.
[33:39.000 --> 33:48.000]  I would use the higher courts on language color of law and or statute, but...
[33:48.000 --> 33:52.000]  Actually, they just use under color of law, and I would just leave it at that.
[33:52.000 --> 34:00.000]  That covers statute, ordinance, or anything else they pretend to throw at you as if it actually applied to you.
[34:00.000 --> 34:03.000]  But other than that, it looks to be fine.
[34:03.000 --> 34:08.000]  Yeah, and I figured you could probably use that as maybe a template going forward,
[34:08.000 --> 34:12.000]  because I know the record company is the guy's attitude.
[34:12.000 --> 34:17.000]  It looks to be a one-man operation, and he does this all the time, apparently.
[34:17.000 --> 34:24.000]  One of the things he divulged when he had diarrhea of the mouth is that's pretty much a significant source of his business.
[34:24.000 --> 34:30.000]  I figured, you know, I can kind of go after him and get what I need.
[34:30.000 --> 34:33.000]  Absolutely, and if you've got a record...
[34:33.000 --> 34:37.000]  Now, Connecticut, can you do one-party recording?
[34:37.000 --> 34:39.000]  No, you cannot.
[34:39.000 --> 34:43.000]  Okay, so you don't have an actual audio recording of the encounter with me?
[34:43.000 --> 34:54.000]  No, I do not, but there was a witness, because I know the record that I hired to come down there to recover the property did witness the whole thing.
[34:54.000 --> 35:05.000]  Well, you can also send... When you do this and get it filed, you can send him a list of interrogatories and demand that he answer
[35:05.000 --> 35:12.000]  how much of the towing under police authority is a financial resource of his business.
[35:12.000 --> 35:17.000]  And, you know, getting to answer that in the interrogatories.
[35:17.000 --> 35:20.000]  So, that would be...
[35:20.000 --> 35:29.000]  He had to do that, you know, because based on the diarrhea of the mouth that he had, it really seems to be a huge part,
[35:29.000 --> 35:35.000]  and it seems that, you know, the state police have picked him because he wouldn't ask too many dumb questions.
[35:35.000 --> 35:36.000]  Right.
[35:36.000 --> 35:47.000]  Yeah, you should be able just to ask him an interrogatorial question, such as, please indicate the total amount of financial income to your business
[35:47.000 --> 35:55.000]  based upon, you know, tow services provided to state and local police agencies.
[35:55.000 --> 36:05.000]  Yes, I mean, that's kind of one of the things I plan to do, although the phraseology is, it's obviously going to cover multiple interrogatories.
[36:05.000 --> 36:14.000]  Yeah, you're going to want the approximate amount and how and what percentage that amount actually equals to of his total business income.
[36:14.000 --> 36:18.000]  Yeah, because he seemed like a very small operation.
[36:18.000 --> 36:22.000]  Like I said, I mean, this shop was basically in a swamp.
[36:22.000 --> 36:25.000]  I mean, my car was...
[36:25.000 --> 36:32.000]  Aside from the other two, it was one of the three outside, and there was a truck inside of his garage.
[36:32.000 --> 36:36.000]  So he's not very big at all.
[36:36.000 --> 36:39.000]  All right, well, that works out.
[36:39.000 --> 36:41.000]  All right, well, good luck with it.
[36:41.000 --> 36:45.000]  Yeah, you know, and I figured you could use it, you know, because you kind of put out a call.
[36:45.000 --> 36:52.000]  And I know a lot of times with this, it's hard to, you know, get specific instances where things happen.
[36:52.000 --> 36:56.000]  So I, you know, I'm kind of hoping this complaint helps you in the future.
[36:56.000 --> 36:59.000]  Well, appreciate that.
[36:59.000 --> 37:03.000]  For those that have jurisdiction area, it ought to at least look somewhat familiar.
[37:03.000 --> 37:08.000]  Yeah, well, in any case, keep up the good work and I'll talk to you guys soon.
[37:08.000 --> 37:11.000]  Thanks, Dan. Appreciate it a lot.
[37:11.000 --> 37:13.000]  All right, folks, that was it.
[37:13.000 --> 37:16.000]  Dan was our only caller remaining and we haven't picked up any new ones.
[37:16.000 --> 37:19.000]  So now you got to listen to me.
[37:19.000 --> 37:29.000]  What I would like to do since we are waiting on other callers at this point is I am going to go through some changes that we are making specifically to these documents.
[37:29.000 --> 37:37.000]  Those of you that have a seminar material know that there is a document in there called the affidavit of appearance.
[37:37.000 --> 37:39.000]  That document is going to be going away.
[37:39.000 --> 37:43.000]  It's going to be replaced with a separate affidavit.
[37:43.000 --> 37:51.000]  We're going to integrate the affidavit of appearance and the affidavit of not in commerce or transportation.
[37:51.000 --> 38:02.000]  We're simply going to file the affidavit asserting that we would never were or have been in transportation, including at the time this citation was issued.
[38:02.000 --> 38:07.000]  And what I would like to do while we're waiting on callers, which we've just picked one up.
[38:07.000 --> 38:12.000]  So, Dale, give me just one second and I'll get with you there.
[38:12.000 --> 38:24.000]  If we don't get any more callers after Dale, then I'm going to start going through this affidavit paragraph by paragraph and explaining to you exactly what we're going to be doing with it and why.
[38:24.000 --> 38:41.000]  We are going to format it based on some information that me and my assistance of counsel have discussed over how to address the lack of authority in the courts because they're moving forward.
[38:41.000 --> 38:47.000]  Even when a case has not been filed, they are holding hearings.
[38:47.000 --> 38:57.000]  They are doing everything under the sun as if they have a valid case in front of them and yet no complaint and charging instrument even exists.
[38:57.000 --> 39:03.000]  So what and how is the court moving forward to do anything?
[39:03.000 --> 39:05.000]  Well, let me tell you how.
[39:05.000 --> 39:07.000]  You're agreeing to it.
[39:07.000 --> 39:13.000]  You're not putting a stop to it by objecting to the actions of the court.
[39:13.000 --> 39:19.000]  So we're going to be doing these things as we're going through here.
[39:19.000 --> 39:23.000]  I must have spoke too soon because Dale's disappeared off the collar board.
[39:23.000 --> 39:29.000]  So I am going to go ahead and go into how these documents are set up.
[39:29.000 --> 39:38.000]  And this affidavit is very short. It's eight pages including the verification and certificate of service and the style page up front.
[39:38.000 --> 39:45.000]  In fact, the actual body of the affidavit doesn't begin until the very bottom of page two.
[39:45.000 --> 39:49.000]  So the actual information in it is short, sweet, and to the point.
[39:49.000 --> 40:03.000]  The one thing you will notice on the front page is that there is a footnote next to the cause number at the top of the style and there is a footnote next to the county and state.
[40:03.000 --> 40:10.000]  And this is what the footnotes have at the bottom so that you will understand where we're going with this.
[40:10.000 --> 40:13.000]  Footnote number one, dealing with the cause number.
[40:13.000 --> 40:19.000]  Only cases have numbers. There are being no charging instruments filed, much less served.
[40:19.000 --> 40:26.000]  There is no case here by any number. Until state proves standing on the record, this is a non case.
[40:26.000 --> 40:39.000]  Then we cite Austin v. New Hampshire and several other cases, i.e. this case is civil until state proves standing under the criminal penalties.
[40:39.000 --> 40:45.000]  In order to do that, state has to prove an act of transportation occurs.
[40:45.000 --> 40:50.000]  State doesn't get standing unless they can prove transportation.
[40:50.000 --> 40:54.000]  They can only prove it in one of two ways.
[40:54.000 --> 41:07.000]  By acquiescence of the accused, not objecting to the usage of the terms, thus creating the prima facie case against them that they were engaging in transportation.
[41:07.000 --> 41:21.000]  Or they produce physical evidence that proves that transportation was actually taking place, meaning a bill of lading or passenger manifest.
[41:21.000 --> 41:28.000]  Those are the only two ways state can prove standing on the record in court during the evidentiary phase.
[41:28.000 --> 41:46.000]  If you are objecting to every inference by the state and the presumption by the state that you were engaging in transportation, then at the end of the trial, state has not established a prima facie case.
[41:46.000 --> 41:58.000]  The only way state can possibly win on appeal is for you to fail to object or by producing that physical evidence.
[41:58.000 --> 42:09.000]  So as long as you've objected and they did not get their hands on any physical evidence to use against you, such as you producing a driver's license on demand.
[42:09.000 --> 42:19.000]  That's another way, by the way, the moment you produce that license without qualification and give it to the officer at the traffic stop.
[42:19.000 --> 42:34.000]  Or you produce any of the other accouterments that would associate you with transportation, such as a registered vehicle or proof of financial responsibility as a requirement.
[42:34.000 --> 42:39.000]  Then you are giving them evidence for a prima facie case.
[42:39.000 --> 42:42.000]  Stop doing that.
[42:42.000 --> 42:47.000]  Now, there's a couple of other issues this raises that we're making documents for.
[42:47.000 --> 42:51.000]  We're going to be making a new document motion to suppress.
[42:51.000 --> 42:56.000]  We're going to suppress everything the cop laid hands on during the stop.
[42:56.000 --> 42:57.000]  Why?
[42:57.000 --> 43:00.000]  Because the stop was a custodial arrest.
[43:00.000 --> 43:14.000]  We were never morandized. Therefore, according to Texas case law and federal case law, any statements made or evidence secured without a warrant is an illegal search and seizure.
[43:14.000 --> 43:23.000]  And because it is that evidence or test or statements must be suppressed, they can't be used.
[43:23.000 --> 43:28.000]  Without those things, the citation can't be used.
[43:28.000 --> 43:34.000]  Without the citation, there's nothing for the officer to testify to.
[43:34.000 --> 43:39.000]  And if there's nothing for him to testify to, the case is over.
[43:39.000 --> 43:41.000]  There's no issue here.
[43:41.000 --> 43:43.000]  So the court has to dismiss.
[43:43.000 --> 43:45.000]  Of course, they won't.
[43:45.000 --> 43:48.000]  But again, that's the appealable issue we'll be going forward with.
[43:48.000 --> 43:50.000]  Alright folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[43:50.000 --> 43:53.000]  Call in numbers 512-646-984.
[43:53.000 --> 43:55.000]  We get back on the other side.
[43:55.000 --> 43:58.000]  I'll continue with the affidavit until we start getting some callers.
[43:58.000 --> 44:27.000]  Right back.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  The jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:06.000]  The Oklahoma City bombing, top 10 reasons to question the official story.
[45:06.000 --> 45:10.000]  Reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices.
[45:10.000 --> 45:18.000]  On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the writer truck report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators.
[45:18.000 --> 45:25.000]  FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone delivered the writer truck bomb to the Murra building and detonated it.
[45:25.000 --> 45:33.000]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley, who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing,
[45:33.000 --> 45:39.000]  testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fable John Doe number two, exiting the writer truck.
[45:39.000 --> 45:51.000]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing, no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing,
[45:51.000 --> 45:57.000]  including when he rented the writer truck, and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:57.000 --> 46:13.000]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:27.000 --> 46:44.000]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Rural Law Radio. Again, call and number is 512-646-1984.
[46:44.000 --> 46:57.000]  Okay, I am going through the affidavit not in commercial transportation associated with the seminar material since I was giving out the actual affidavit of appearance for free. This one will replace that.
[46:57.000 --> 47:07.000]  So this one will give out to people that are not yet purchasers of the seminar material to give them an example of what they will be getting if they actually get it.
[47:07.000 --> 47:14.000]  Now, before I get back into this, there is an FYI I want to make everyone aware of about the seminar material.
[47:14.000 --> 47:28.000]  Originally when we did the traffic seminar, it was to make people familiar with how to read and understand statutory law and what the transportation code really applied to.
[47:28.000 --> 47:43.000]  It was never about going to court. Randy came up with the idea along with Deborah collaborating and they produced the original set of documents for the seminar that we were going to use to try to fight some of these issues in court.
[47:43.000 --> 47:52.000]  But when I originally conceptualized the idea of educating people on this, the going to court part was not in the mix.
[47:52.000 --> 47:59.000]  Why? I didn't know that I was going to be able to get people to understand the issues of going to court.
[47:59.000 --> 48:12.000]  Filing paperwork is one thing. Understanding it and arguing it in front of a room full of people you don't know and the judge is doing his best to railroad you is intimidating enough when you're willing to do it, much less when you have no clue.
[48:12.000 --> 48:16.000]  So that was never my original concept in this.
[48:16.000 --> 48:36.000]  That being said, we have expanded into that greatly. I am now far, far more familiar with the due process procedures, the code of criminal procedures and all the other codes associated with the various aspects of these courts and what they are supposed to be doing and how they're supposed to be doing it.
[48:36.000 --> 48:58.000]  So given that, my eventual goal here is to separate the legal paperwork for going to court from the traffic portion of the seminar and integrated into the traffic court survivors guide session, which that book will deal strictly with going to court and all the legal issues associated.
[48:58.000 --> 49:12.000]  That's where the paperwork would be most appropriate and the most beneficial because now the paperwork is accompanied by a book that explains everything in detail above and beyond how you're able to do it in the legal pleading.
[49:12.000 --> 49:30.000]  We're able to go into theory and concepts and all this other things that are best left out of legal pleadings, but at least it gives you ideas on how to formulate arguments and conceptualize why their viewpoint is wrong.
[49:30.000 --> 49:46.000]  For instance, if your view is that you can regulate my right to do this one thing, then my view is that somewhere down the line, you're going to come up with the idea that you have the right to regulate my rights in everything.
[49:46.000 --> 50:02.000]  So I have a problem with letting you get a toehold on this first thing and most people don't ever approach it from that point of view. Oh, I don't mind giving up that right. I don't use it very much. It doesn't mean that much to me.
[50:02.000 --> 50:16.000]  I don't do those things so I don't care. Well, people, that is definitely the wrong attitude. I don't care if the right is which side to part your hair on, what color to make it, how much of it you should have.
[50:16.000 --> 50:32.000]  It's your right. It doesn't belong to the government. It's not up to them to determine when and how you can use it, how they can regulate it or restrict it or direct it or manage it or cause you to do any of those things.
[50:32.000 --> 50:44.000]  It's your right, not government's. Stop giving up your rights and then acting like somebody else is a crook because they won't give that right up.
[50:44.000 --> 50:58.000]  And if you think about it, that's what these people that come in on these juries are doing. Well, I don't think I have that right or that I gave that right up and I was willing to do it, so I'm going to hold you accountable for my choices.
[50:58.000 --> 51:16.000]  And sorry, not the way it works. I don't care if one person decides this is the way it is or 500 decides this is the way it is or 5 million. I don't care. Why?
[51:16.000 --> 51:34.000]  Because my rights are individual rights and we don't live by majority vote in America. That's the difference between a republic and a democracy. Maximum percentage does not rule.
[51:34.000 --> 51:51.000]  One man's rights will stand against the rights of 5 million just as well as it will against one in a republic. Why? Because that's what we agreed to accept as our form of government, isn't it?
[51:51.000 --> 52:06.000]  So just because the vast majority of people are willing to surrender a right, that does not obligate any one of us to do the same. And I'm not. Okay? What you do with yours, that's your business.
[52:06.000 --> 52:21.000]  But don't come look at me and say, I gave it up. Why won't you? Because I'm not going to do it. I believe government should never be given a toehold into anything that we didn't give it a specific power to operate within. Period.
[52:21.000 --> 52:36.000]  If it is not absolutely necessary and ancillary to the specifically delegated power and authority we gave them, it is not within their power to do it. Period. No exceptions.
[52:36.000 --> 52:47.000]  That's all there is. That's all she wrote. That's all we gave you. Go do what we gave you the authority to do and stop trying to take authority we didn't.
[52:47.000 --> 52:57.000]  Until we get that attitude and we take on the task on it, we will not change anything. That is the only place where mass numbers mean something.
[52:57.000 --> 53:13.000]  When we join together to subdue our servant government, not in telling me as an individual what rights I have to give up, but to subdue our servant that's running on a muck and destroying everything that we have or established,
[53:13.000 --> 53:21.000]  we're losing control of because we won't band together to control what we created. Big difference.
[53:21.000 --> 53:32.000]  Okay, enough of that rant. Let's get back into the document. Footnote number two, the one that's next to the county and state. The above style is most old. Let me finish footnote number one.
[53:32.000 --> 53:54.000]  The last sentence in footnote number one is a common number associated with this matter is if they've assigned a case number, put it in the footnote. I am recommending that on this affidavit you do not type within the word processor the case number into the document.
[53:54.000 --> 54:10.000]  Print it out and hand write it or leave it blank and make the clerk write it in. That would be my preference entirely. Let them do something besides sit there and give you legal advice that you never solicited or they're capable of giving.
[54:10.000 --> 54:18.000]  Just give it to them blank. But down the footnote you can say that the common number they've associated with this matter is such and such.
[54:18.000 --> 54:30.000]  But in most cases, they haven't even done that. So what this one says is a common number associated with this matter is yet to be established to the knowledge of responding.
[54:30.000 --> 54:43.000]  Okay, so now we can go to footnote number two. The above style, which is everything at the top that says plaintiff versus defendant and what court on what date and all this other kind of stuff.
[54:43.000 --> 54:57.000]  The above style is mostly guesswork. However, comfortably presumed are the plaintiff and the county. The proper name and capacity of both the plaintiff and the court are all still unknown.
[54:57.000 --> 55:09.000]  There has never been timely or proper service on Craig of any charging instrument or anything at all identifying all parties and proper service information for saying, which is true.
[55:09.000 --> 55:19.000]  They've never given you anything that tells you who the prosecutor is, what service address to send information to that's filed in the case, nothing.
[55:19.000 --> 55:31.000]  You're expected to either not serve the prosecution, which they can complain about if they decide to, in which case the judge will turn around and say, well, your motions are denied because you failed to serve opposing counsel.
[55:31.000 --> 55:49.000]  Well, judge, neither you nor opposing counsel ever gave me information to do so. This is your party. I'm the person sent the invitation. Don't you think you ought to be giving me what I need to get here?
[55:49.000 --> 55:54.000]  So this isn't my fault. So that's what we're going to lead into with this.
[55:54.000 --> 56:09.000]  Now, we go into the fact that every document, every single document we file will be presented under special appearance, everything.
[56:09.000 --> 56:27.000]  The moment you go in without specifying it is a special appearance, you are having yourself a general appearance, in which case, in personum jurisdiction is automatically waived and you will never get it back.
[56:27.000 --> 56:41.000]  Once a general appearance is made, special appearances are no longer an option, jurisdiction over the person is now presumed. We are not going to allow them a single presumption to rely on.
[56:41.000 --> 56:48.000]  They're going to prove everything all the way down the line or they're not going to have a case when it's all said and done.
[56:48.000 --> 56:57.000]  Stop doing their work for them and giving them what they need to take you behind the woodshed.
[56:57.000 --> 57:10.000]  You know, one thing when I was growing up, my mama used to mentally torture us and tell you, you go out there to that peach tree and you find me a switch that I can use to whip you for what you just did.
[57:10.000 --> 57:17.000]  Now, you want to talk about child abuse. You're sending the kid out there to find the thing you're going to beat him with.
[57:17.000 --> 57:23.000]  You come back with one too small, they're going to take it out of your hand and say, go back and get another one.
[57:23.000 --> 57:29.000]  You're just prolonging it. You get one that's too big, you're going to be sitting there going, that'll break my back. I can't give you that.
[57:29.000 --> 57:37.000]  So you've got to figure out what the right size is that won't get rejected and won't inflict permanent damage.
[57:37.000 --> 57:47.000]  So stop supplying these people with what they need to inflict damage on you because that's their sole goal here is to harm you.
[57:47.000 --> 57:56.000]  True, it's money, but it's still a harm. What could you have used that money for besides the greedy government coffers?
[57:56.000 --> 57:59.000]  Okay, so think about that.
[57:59.000 --> 58:11.000]  Now, we also are going to object to any non-judicial decision making. Anything the clerk does that doesn't bear a judge's signature, we're not agreeing to.
[58:11.000 --> 58:21.000]  Okay, I hear the music, so we are about to take another break. Woody, I see you have popped up on the board there, so hang on and I will get you on the other side of this.
[58:21.000 --> 58:32.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number is 512-646-1984. When we get back, we'll take Woody's call and if we don't get any others, we will continue on with the affidavit.
[58:32.000 --> 59:00.000]  Alright folks, this is Eddie Craig. We'll be right back.
[59:00.000 --> 59:08.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[59:08.000 --> 59:17.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:17.000 --> 59:38.000]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:38.000 --> 01:00:02.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:02.000 --> 01:00:16.000]  Time out. Go to your room. Parents know that isolating kids is harsh punishment, but what if the isolation never ends? I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with the tragic story of two inmates stuck in permanent solitary.
[01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:34.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:00:34.000 --> 01:00:45.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:57.000]  Solitary confinement is one of the harshest penalties there is. That's why Amnesty International is working to free Albert Woodfox and Herman Wallace from decades of solitary confinement in a Louisiana prison.
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:14.000]  Each man spends 23 hours a day alone in a tiny cell for his alleged role in a 1970s murder. Isolated prisoners can experience depression, despair, claustrophobia, and hallucinations, along with weakened immune systems and psychiatric illnesses.
[01:01:14.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  Lawyers say 40 years of solitary confinement is unprecedented in the US. It's cruel and inhumane and probably illegal. So let's call it time out to this particular time out.
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  Trash trucks across California are rumbling down city streets using clean fuel made from a dirty source, garbage, brilliant innovation, or a few good environmental lunacy.
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:47.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with more.
[01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:58.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:06.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:27.000]  Liquefied natural gas, or LNG, is methane gas turned into a liquid. It's a renewable resource that can be produced from landfills like the one in Altamont, California.
[01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:34.000]  There, the gas from decaying garbage gets sucked into tubes and sent to a facility to be converted into liquefied natural gas.
[01:02:34.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  The 15,000 gallons produced each day are then used to fuel garbage trucks.
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:51.000]  Critics note that liquefying and transporting LNG takes a lot of energy in itself, which reduces the overall environmental benefit, though the fuel may still be better than traditional fuels like oil or coal.
[01:02:51.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  But in any case, fueling garbage trucks with garbage is a spiffy idea.
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:11.000]  Help Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:34.000]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Rural Law Radio. Right now we have Woody in Texas on the board. Woody, what can we do for you?
[01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:56.000]  I just wanted to call in today and speak about a little, I'll call it an incident at the Department of Motor Vehicle. I went in to apply for my Texas ID after listening to the show and trying to be an informed, well I'm not going to say the word citizen, but just an informed person on how to use that ID in different types of situations.
[01:03:56.000 --> 01:04:10.000]  And anyway, we went in there and there was quite a few lines and you could see the people were kind of frustrated and I waited about two, two and a half hours and I could see the disdain on some of the clerk's faces, you know, like why are you people even here?
[01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:25.000]  But that's a different story. The little admission clerk had done a pretty good job, but as I was watching the sheeple as I call it, a young lady came in and went to the front desk and I could tell that she probably wasn't in the greatest mood.
[01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:34.000]  But she just wasn't getting the answers or the cooperation that she needed. So she cussed out loud, Eddie. And I thought, wow, this is interesting.
[01:04:34.000 --> 01:04:51.000]  Thank God for freedom of speech, but it wasn't bad. It didn't disrupt the place. And next thing I knew, the young lady behind the counter asked for assistance and as God as my witness, the Texas State Troopers just kind of came out of nowhere.
[01:04:51.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  One came out, he was in work mode. His veins in his neck were throbbing. He was all, well, I'm going to say he was all bowed up and he kind of like, where is it? What is it?
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  Kind of like a tag dog. So the young lady behind the desk basically said, there's the lady there. So he announced that basically this is going to happen around here and you need to follow me into this room and I'm thinking, oh my God, let the beatings begin.
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:30.000]  So I'm thinking, what can I do? I don't have a video camera with me. I don't know what I can do. So I continue to monitor the situation.
[01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:40.000]  And again, to my great disappointment, a lot of the sheep will just weren't really paying too much attention. I guess they kind of just think, oh, well, it's just par for the course.
[01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:53.000]  Well, after they finished their business guy in the back room there, the man came out again and kind of asked the clerk, admissions clerk, what had gone on and it wasn't much of a conversation.
[01:05:53.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  And they were kind of laughing a little bit, you know, and so he went back and another trooper went back with him and I never saw the young lady again, but he came back into the journal area there with the front desk area was and basically I heard him say,
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  she really had a bad attitude and you could just see his face light up, you know, like boy, I did my job.
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:35.000]  So I guess really the whole purpose of my call here is today is to ask what in the world could I have done if I'd been a little more aware of any kind of, I hate to even say the word right, but legal standing would I have to have gone up to that officer
[01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  without putting myself into the interrogation room.
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:44.000]  Well, see, there's the issue, isn't it?
[01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:45.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:51.000]  It doesn't matter what you do, they're going to see it as grounds for them to exercise an authority they don't have.
[01:06:51.000 --> 01:06:52.000]  Correct.
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  Which is suppress your right to manage your public servants and how they act.
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:07:05.000]  Okay, I would have simply asked him just exactly what did you do with her.
[01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:15.000]  And if he asked what business it was of yours, then I'm a concerned citizen that is sitting here watching this little show you guys are putting on.
[01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:24.000]  And I have a deep suspicion that you're exercising an authority you don't have and that you're using excessive force against this young lady.
[01:07:24.000 --> 01:07:29.000]  Because I was a witness to what she said and she didn't say anything that merits you taking her anywhere.
[01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:30.000]  Correct.
[01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:31.000]  I thought it was freedom of speech.
[01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:37.000]  I thought maybe, my gosh, why couldn't they have just dismissed her for the day or something or something, you know, you need to leave the building.
[01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:42.000]  But to write someone a ticket as a, I'm not sure if it's a criminal offense, doesn't really matter.
[01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:47.000]  It's still, they had that implied authority to do this.
[01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:58.000]  And then again, this just blows my mind, this guy was like a canine dog on a leash when it was like the button got pushed.
[01:07:58.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  I'm on duty.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  I've never physically seen that in my life until the day and I've heard about this.
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:08.000]  But today I am, I know it's true.
[01:08:08.000 --> 01:08:11.000]  Yeah, they are completely out of control.
[01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:14.000]  There is absolutely no doubt about that whatsoever.
[01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:22.000]  So I guess I'll just have to comply and sit down a little bit, but they still have to try to say something without getting into the interrogation room.
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:25.000]  Because I know it would have been, we need to see your ID.
[01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:26.000]  What are you doing here today?
[01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:29.000]  You know, we're going to run your.
[01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  Well, you can simply get up there and say, officer, can I get your name?
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:36.000]  Because I have a feeling I'm going to have to file an incident report against you.
[01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  And I would really like to make sure the information is correct.
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:42.000]  So can I get your name and badge number?
[01:08:42.000 --> 01:08:44.000]  Mm-hmm.
[01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:46.000]  That'll put him in a tizzy real quick.
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  Right.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:52.000]  Who would I possibly file that with if I was to go back and get that information?
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:53.000]  It isn't important.
[01:08:53.000 --> 01:08:58.000]  It's just a matter of you making him think that somebody's watching what he does and doesn't agree with it.
[01:08:58.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  Gotcha.
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:01.000]  What about if he goes into...
[01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:06.000]  You can go to whoever the supervisor is there in that particular station.
[01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  Okay.
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:11.000]  And then when that gets you nowhere, you can go to the director of the department.
[01:09:11.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  Okay.
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  Follow the chain.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:14.000]  Exactly.
[01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:15.000]  All right, Eddie.
[01:09:15.000 --> 01:09:16.000]  I'll do that.
[01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:18.000]  I think I will do that because it is time.
[01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:19.000]  And I can...
[01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  I should even have to apologize about saying it's time for people to take a stand now.
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:24.000]  But this is the...
[01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:27.000]  Everything's just nipping us around the butt here.
[01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:29.000]  I mean, it's kind of like in Germany.
[01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:32.000]  Well, they're not after me, but eventually they will be after you.
[01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:34.000]  That's what I see happening right now, you know?
[01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:36.000]  Yeah, that's exactly right.
[01:09:36.000 --> 01:09:37.000]  I'm going to do that, my friend.
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:41.000]  And thank you again, great show.
[01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:42.000]  I just called in.
[01:09:42.000 --> 01:09:46.000]  I didn't hear the previous portion of the show, but I appreciate all the information.
[01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  I'll have some people calling with their traffic scenarios tonight because I get a wealth of
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:56.000]  information just by listening to people's different scenarios and how you assist them.
[01:09:56.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  So thank you again for everything you and Deborah and Randy do.
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:00.000]  All right.
[01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:01.000]  Well, thank you.
[01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  Appreciate it.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:03.000]  Thanks, Woody.
[01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:06.000]  And I have a comment on this whole scenario as well.
[01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:12.000]  We do need to, in a smart way, stand up and exercise our rights.
[01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:17.000]  Like Eddie said, just simply ask him for his name and his badge number.
[01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:23.000]  We want to be careful with these people and not get ourselves thrown in the clink, so to speak,
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  because as I was explaining on another show, nowadays, they will take your iris scan.
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:30.000]  They'll take your blood.
[01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:35.000]  They'll run you through the naked body scanner, fry you with radiation, all these things.
[01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  And you're not even convicted.
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:38.000]  That's just upon arrest.
[01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:43.000]  So if you want to stay out of their biometric system, you really have to be careful to not
[01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:47.000]  get arrested in the first place.
[01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:51.000]  Another point that I wanted to make about some of these guys, I'm not saying they're all
[01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:58.000]  like that, but many of them I have seen are obviously on anabolic steroids, which causes
[01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  brain damage, it causes people to regress in their behavior and lose their sense of right
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:11.000]  and wrong and morality and these sorts of things so that it can be very dangerous.
[01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:13.000]  How many known is Royd Rage?
[01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  Royd Rage, exactly.
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:22.000]  Some of them, unfortunately, are victims of experimental drugs and vaccines because they
[01:11:22.000 --> 01:11:28.000]  were in the military and that has caused brain damage and behavioral change.
[01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:32.000]  And so you do have to be very careful with these individuals because a lot of them are
[01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:34.000]  just not in the right mind.
[01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:40.000]  And the third point I wanted to make, especially for the females out there, anytime anything
[01:11:40.000 --> 01:11:45.000]  like this happens, do not go in that room.
[01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:46.000]  Do not.
[01:11:46.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  I repeat because if you go in that room, you might get raped.
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:11:55.000]  Okay?
[01:11:55.000 --> 01:11:58.000]  And for the men too, do not go in the room.
[01:11:58.000 --> 01:11:59.000]  You might get beat up.
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:01.000]  There's no telling what can happen.
[01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:07.000]  Anytime something like that happens in a public place and this officer comes out and says,
[01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:12.000]  I want to talk to you, then you're like, I would be, well, okay, what's going on?
[01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:15.000]  And I would insist that they talk to me right there.
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:19.000]  And if they didn't want to talk to me in the lobby in front of all the crowd, I say, well,
[01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:20.000]  then let's step outside.
[01:12:20.000 --> 01:12:27.000]  And if they insisted on wanting to take me somewhere, I'd be like, am I under arrest?
[01:12:27.000 --> 01:12:28.000]  Am I under arrest?
[01:12:28.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  Yes or no?
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:35.000]  And if the answer is no, then I'm not going anywhere, especially without female officers
[01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  present.
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:40.000]  Even if there were female officers present, no, I'm not going anywhere unless I'm under
[01:12:40.000 --> 01:12:41.000]  arrest.
[01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:45.000]  People, you just have to be extremely, extremely careful.
[01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  But as a woman, do not go anywhere alone with, obviously, in a situation like that because
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:55.000]  you could be putting your life in danger, you could get raped.
[01:12:55.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  You'll never be the same psychologically.
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:04.800]  So I would just highly advise people not to go because that's actually how Randy ended
[01:13:04.800 --> 01:13:09.400]  up getting arrested at the courthouse in Williamson County.
[01:13:09.400 --> 01:13:17.400]  Because they insisted the deputies there, actually it was the Georgetown police that
[01:13:17.400 --> 01:13:22.400]  came, which they had no jurisdiction in the courthouse anyway because it's a county courthouse.
[01:13:22.400 --> 01:13:25.120]  Only the sheriff's deputies had jurisdiction there.
[01:13:25.120 --> 01:13:32.200]  But at any rate, the local police show up and basically coerced him into going into
[01:13:32.200 --> 01:13:38.520]  a so-called interrogation room where they proceeded to begin to manhandle him.
[01:13:38.520 --> 01:13:46.880]  And as he put up his hand to block their punches, then they arrest him and beat him up and charge
[01:13:46.880 --> 01:13:49.640]  him with assault of an officer.
[01:13:49.640 --> 01:13:53.400]  And fortunately, there was one witness, Michael Badnerick, but the point is, even with the
[01:13:53.400 --> 01:13:57.800]  witness, it was still a major problem, do not go in that room.
[01:13:57.800 --> 01:13:58.800]  You hear me?
[01:13:58.800 --> 01:14:00.160]  Do not go down the hallway with them.
[01:14:00.160 --> 01:14:05.640]  Do not go in the room, especially if you're a female because you likely will end up regretting
[01:14:05.640 --> 01:14:07.200]  it for the rest of your life.
[01:14:07.200 --> 01:14:10.520]  If you're not under arrest, you don't need to be going with them.
[01:14:10.520 --> 01:14:11.520]  Period.
[01:14:11.520 --> 01:14:13.720]  So that's my comments on that scenario.
[01:14:13.720 --> 01:14:18.040]  Well, I think that there are just so many facets to all this stuff.
[01:14:18.040 --> 01:14:19.400]  And I feel for the young lady.
[01:14:19.400 --> 01:14:22.000]  I mean, it just seems like that was freedom of speech.
[01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:24.200]  It didn't disrupt the room or anything.
[01:14:24.200 --> 01:14:26.640]  And of course, everybody says that's just an opinion.
[01:14:26.640 --> 01:14:29.640]  But my God, you can hardly do anything anymore without being...
[01:14:29.640 --> 01:14:35.640]  Well, that goes to my point about why you never go anywhere in public without a digital
[01:14:35.640 --> 01:14:40.080]  recorder on you and you especially don't go somewhere in public where you're going to
[01:14:40.080 --> 01:14:42.680]  deal with a public servant.
[01:14:42.680 --> 01:14:45.200]  Don't just don't do it.
[01:14:45.200 --> 01:14:50.840]  Had this young lady had the foresight to record the conversation going on with this DPS officer,
[01:14:50.840 --> 01:14:53.640]  she might have grounds to assure he doesn't have a job.
[01:14:53.640 --> 01:14:54.640]  Right.
[01:14:54.640 --> 01:14:56.840]  Can I record the police there?
[01:14:56.840 --> 01:14:57.840]  Absolutely.
[01:14:57.840 --> 01:15:00.320]  Texas is a one-party state.
[01:15:00.320 --> 01:15:01.320]  Okay.
[01:15:01.320 --> 01:15:02.320]  Okay.
[01:15:02.320 --> 01:15:03.960]  All right then.
[01:15:03.960 --> 01:15:04.960]  Thank you again, Eddie and Deborah.
[01:15:04.960 --> 01:15:05.960]  You got other callers.
[01:15:05.960 --> 01:15:06.960]  All right.
[01:15:06.960 --> 01:15:07.960]  Thank you.
[01:15:07.960 --> 01:15:08.960]  Yes, sir.
[01:15:08.960 --> 01:15:09.960]  Thank you, Woody.
[01:15:09.960 --> 01:15:10.960]  Hit it.
[01:15:10.960 --> 01:15:11.960]  Bye-bye.
[01:15:11.960 --> 01:15:12.960]  Bye-bye.
[01:15:12.960 --> 01:15:13.960]  All right.
[01:15:13.960 --> 01:15:14.960]  Now we're going to go to Stephen in Texas.
[01:15:14.960 --> 01:15:15.960]  Stephen, what can we do for you?
[01:15:15.960 --> 01:15:18.960]  Well, I've talked to you before that the dog catcher ticket had the hearing today.
[01:15:18.960 --> 01:15:19.960]  It didn't go like I thought it would.
[01:15:19.960 --> 01:15:24.960]  And I think after hearing you talk earlier that I've already given them the in-pump
[01:15:24.960 --> 01:15:25.960]  chrysalm jurisdiction.
[01:15:25.960 --> 01:15:32.600]  You know, my point today is telling them I was there by special appearance and that
[01:15:32.600 --> 01:15:35.840]  I didn't give them jurisdiction is that all we believe we have it.
[01:15:35.840 --> 01:15:38.440]  Well, that doesn't grant them jurisdiction.
[01:15:38.440 --> 01:15:40.600]  They can't just believe they have it.
[01:15:40.600 --> 01:15:41.600]  All right.
[01:15:41.600 --> 01:15:44.120]  Once it's challenged, they're required to prove it on the record.
[01:15:44.120 --> 01:15:47.640]  Well, they didn't prove it on the record and I told them that I wasn't ready to make
[01:15:47.640 --> 01:15:50.600]  a plea because I didn't understand the nature and the cause and wasn't understanding the
[01:15:50.600 --> 01:15:51.600]  charges.
[01:15:51.600 --> 01:15:54.120]  Did they ever serve you with a copy of the complaint?
[01:15:54.120 --> 01:15:57.600]  Well, a year ago, December.
[01:15:57.600 --> 01:15:58.600]  Where?
[01:15:58.600 --> 01:16:02.720]  Well, they never served me, they sent it by mail to the house.
[01:16:02.720 --> 01:16:04.600]  Did they get it certified mail?
[01:16:04.600 --> 01:16:05.600]  No.
[01:16:05.600 --> 01:16:07.600]  Then what proof do they have they served you?
[01:16:07.600 --> 01:16:08.600]  They don't.
[01:16:08.600 --> 01:16:09.600]  They don't have any.
[01:16:09.600 --> 01:16:10.600]  Exactly.
[01:16:10.600 --> 01:16:13.600]  Why aren't you challenging notice?
[01:16:13.600 --> 01:16:16.600]  Well, I just had a loss.
[01:16:16.600 --> 01:16:19.600]  This was my first time to go in and...
[01:16:19.600 --> 01:16:23.600]  Well, that's always the first thing you pay attention to is lack of notice.
[01:16:23.600 --> 01:16:27.600]  Here's the deal about even if they send you the complaint, it's not sufficient.
[01:16:27.600 --> 01:16:35.240]  The complaint does not tell you anything about who the opposing party is other than the state.
[01:16:35.240 --> 01:16:40.240]  It doesn't have any information on it about where to send your filings to the opposing
[01:16:40.240 --> 01:16:42.600]  council, nothing.
[01:16:42.600 --> 01:16:47.720]  So even though it's notice of the nature and cause, it's not notice of a cause against
[01:16:47.720 --> 01:16:50.560]  you because it's not a proper charging instrument in Texas.
[01:16:50.560 --> 01:16:54.560]  There has to be an information for it to be a proper charging instrument and that has
[01:16:54.560 --> 01:16:56.080]  to have everything on it.
[01:16:56.080 --> 01:17:01.080]  All right, folks, this Rural Law Radio will be right back.
[01:17:01.080 --> 01:17:05.440]  Capital Coin & Bullion is a family-owned business built on the promise to bring you affordable
[01:17:05.440 --> 01:17:08.520]  pricing on all Coin & Bullion products.
[01:17:08.520 --> 01:17:12.960]  In addition to coins and bullions, we now offer storeable freeze-dried foods produced
[01:17:12.960 --> 01:17:19.080]  by Augustin Farms, ammunition at 10% above wholesale prices, Berkey Water Products, gift
[01:17:19.080 --> 01:17:24.320]  certificates, and our Silver Pool, a new way to guarantee silver by prepaying at a locked
[01:17:24.320 --> 01:17:25.320]  price.
[01:17:25.320 --> 01:17:28.200]  We can even help you set up a metals IRA account.
[01:17:28.200 --> 01:17:32.720]  Call us at 512-646-6404 for more details.
[01:17:32.720 --> 01:17:37.840]  As always, we buy, sell, and trade precious metals, give appraisals, and cater to those
[01:17:37.840 --> 01:17:40.240]  with all sizes of coin collections.
[01:17:40.240 --> 01:17:45.280]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half a mile north of Canig next
[01:17:45.280 --> 01:17:48.000]  to the Ikebond Sushi and Jeannie Car Wash.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:51.560]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[01:17:51.560 --> 01:17:58.080]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6404 and say you heard about us on
[01:17:58.080 --> 01:18:01.320]  Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[01:18:01.320 --> 01:18:03.440]  What's been the problem with phone companies?
[01:18:03.440 --> 01:18:09.680]  High prices and contracts that lock you in for two years minimum, not FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:09.680 --> 01:18:14.400]  Freedom Telephones are designed around the concept and reality of patriotism, loyalty,
[01:18:14.400 --> 01:18:15.400]  and privacy.
[01:18:15.400 --> 01:18:20.880]  With FreedomTelephones.com, there are no contracts, no credit checks, and no social security numbers
[01:18:20.880 --> 01:18:21.880]  required.
[01:18:21.880 --> 01:18:24.480]  That's why our name is FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:24.480 --> 01:18:29.360]  Finally, residential, mobile, and business telephones and plans that are private and
[01:18:29.360 --> 01:18:31.360]  never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:31.360 --> 01:18:33.360]  Want a low price?
[01:18:33.360 --> 01:18:38.480]  Residential and business plans started only $14.99 and mobile plans started just $39.99.
[01:18:38.480 --> 01:18:44.600]  Plus, every month you pay your bill, FreedomTelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs.
[01:18:44.600 --> 01:18:45.600]  Don't wait.
[01:18:45.600 --> 01:18:53.080]  Start the cause and get the highest quality and the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553.
[01:18:53.080 --> 01:18:56.240]  That's 800-600-5553.
[01:18:56.240 --> 01:18:58.120]  FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:58.120 --> 01:19:27.120]  It's a portable, private, perfect.
[01:19:27.120 --> 01:19:32.840]  We are back and we are continuing on, and we are talking to Stephen in Texas.
[01:19:32.840 --> 01:19:35.120]  All right, Stephen, let's continue on.
[01:19:35.120 --> 01:19:40.880]  Okay, anyway, it didn't matter really, actually it didn't matter what I said.
[01:19:40.880 --> 01:19:44.120]  They were going to do whatever they wanted to do.
[01:19:44.120 --> 01:19:45.120]  Well, exactly.
[01:19:45.120 --> 01:19:47.120]  Haven't you listened to this show before?
[01:19:47.120 --> 01:19:48.120]  Oh, yeah.
[01:19:48.120 --> 01:19:55.160]  And the court hearing is, or the alleged trial date is in July, and they said I had up until
[01:19:55.160 --> 01:19:59.680]  14 days before to get more papers in, but one of the things that the judge-
[01:19:59.680 --> 01:20:00.680]  Well, now, wait a minute.
[01:20:00.680 --> 01:20:03.840]  Did they hold a pretrial or was this your first appearance?
[01:20:03.840 --> 01:20:07.680]  This was the first appearance and pretrial.
[01:20:07.680 --> 01:20:10.400]  Well, no, they're not the same thing.
[01:20:10.400 --> 01:20:14.560]  Okay, well, this was what they called the pretrial, where she calls you in the little
[01:20:14.560 --> 01:20:17.720]  room and says, what are you going to do and all this?
[01:20:17.720 --> 01:20:19.880]  And I told her I wasn't ready to make it.
[01:20:19.880 --> 01:20:20.880]  Well, now, wait a minute.
[01:20:20.880 --> 01:20:25.600]  Is this a pretrial conference with the prosecutor or this is a pretrial hearing with the judge?
[01:20:25.600 --> 01:20:30.600]  I signed it up with both because I wouldn't enter a place, so were you going to do this
[01:20:30.600 --> 01:20:31.600]  on the record?
[01:20:31.600 --> 01:20:33.600]  You know, a little court court, so were you going to do this on the record then?
[01:20:33.600 --> 01:20:35.600]  I said, I'm on for the record.
[01:20:35.600 --> 01:20:38.600]  I raised my hand, so it was very disdainful.
[01:20:38.600 --> 01:20:40.600]  This is a court of record?
[01:20:40.600 --> 01:20:44.360]  Yeah, I said this is a court of record, yes it is.
[01:20:44.360 --> 01:20:45.360]  Okay.
[01:20:45.360 --> 01:20:49.560]  Then, yeah, you should have been objecting to everything they were doing.
[01:20:49.560 --> 01:20:51.560]  What paperwork have you filed, if any?
[01:20:51.560 --> 01:20:53.560]  I filed lots of paperwork.
[01:20:53.560 --> 01:20:58.720]  Of course, I've been listening to too many different people to sound like.
[01:20:58.720 --> 01:21:03.400]  The executor letter, I sent it back with a neutral response to that on the step.
[01:21:03.400 --> 01:21:07.080]  I signed a ticket to begin with to refuse the contract, right in front of the policeman
[01:21:07.080 --> 01:21:08.080]  that I made him call.
[01:21:08.080 --> 01:21:11.080]  He didn't get my driver's license out of my billfold.
[01:21:11.080 --> 01:21:12.080]  Okay.
[01:21:12.080 --> 01:21:18.440]  I said, all kinds of stuff, so I'm noticing the man to the judge and I guess it's the
[01:21:18.440 --> 01:21:23.480]  city attorney who's not the same as the city prosecutor, you know, of course it was styled
[01:21:23.480 --> 01:21:30.480]  in the state of Texas versus me, my all-caps name, and I said there are several irregularities
[01:21:30.480 --> 01:21:38.160]  on the face of this that, you know, this something's not right here, and then one judge said,
[01:21:38.160 --> 01:21:44.360]  you know, she made the point that, well, there's no motion before, it's like she would dismiss
[01:21:44.360 --> 01:21:46.520]  it right then if I had a motion.
[01:21:46.520 --> 01:21:49.240]  So, why didn't you make a motion?
[01:21:49.240 --> 01:21:53.440]  So, well, we have to have it in writing and said, well, is that because I'm a dead corporation
[01:21:53.440 --> 01:21:54.440]  right here?
[01:21:54.440 --> 01:21:56.160]  No, no, they don't.
[01:21:56.160 --> 01:22:01.080]  You have the right to move the court orally as well as in writing.
[01:22:01.080 --> 01:22:05.480]  Well, then there's another denial of due process.
[01:22:05.480 --> 01:22:11.040]  I did have a witness with this, and there's public court, I don't know what their transcript
[01:22:11.040 --> 01:22:19.920]  B will be, but anyway, I'm moving whatever it takes to do what we need to do to get them
[01:22:19.920 --> 01:22:22.720]  straightened out.
[01:22:22.720 --> 01:22:27.480]  You need to get your hands on a copy of the local rules of court.
[01:22:27.480 --> 01:22:33.560]  Their computer said, go look at the Texas criminal procedures.
[01:22:33.560 --> 01:22:36.040]  So there is no local rules of court?
[01:22:36.040 --> 01:22:37.600]  That's all they offered.
[01:22:37.600 --> 01:22:43.120]  Okay, well, then they can't come back later and say that you didn't file timely in accordance
[01:22:43.120 --> 01:22:47.600]  with the local rules of telling you there aren't any.
[01:22:47.600 --> 01:22:48.600]  Right.
[01:22:48.600 --> 01:22:49.600]  Okay.
[01:22:49.600 --> 01:22:54.920]  All right, and one type of ticket, a dog catcher ticket?
[01:22:54.920 --> 01:22:59.920]  A dog catcher ticket, and from what we can tell, the dog catcher left the dog out so
[01:22:59.920 --> 01:23:04.600]  he could write the ticket for no registration, for running straight, because the dogs have
[01:23:04.600 --> 01:23:06.600]  never been back out.
[01:23:06.600 --> 01:23:07.600]  Yeah.
[01:23:07.600 --> 01:23:10.400]  Well, that wouldn't surprise me either.
[01:23:10.400 --> 01:23:15.960]  I had the dog catcher and Nacodotus come on my property without my consent, and I told
[01:23:15.960 --> 01:23:20.240]  them they even came with three different, with three Nacodotus police officers, and I told
[01:23:20.240 --> 01:23:23.440]  everyone of them, get off, don't come back.
[01:23:23.440 --> 01:23:25.440]  Well, we have the authority to be here.
[01:23:25.440 --> 01:23:26.440]  No, you don't.
[01:23:26.440 --> 01:23:28.640]  I am not a pet shop.
[01:23:28.640 --> 01:23:33.560]  You have no authority on this place, and if you come back, post it in that sign over
[01:23:33.560 --> 01:23:37.360]  there as a criminal trespass warning, and it is directed at you.
[01:23:37.360 --> 01:23:42.760]  And now in front of these three officers, I'm telling you, don't set foot on this property
[01:23:42.760 --> 01:23:47.320]  again, or I will press charges.
[01:23:47.320 --> 01:23:50.200]  Dog catcher never came back, ever.
[01:23:50.200 --> 01:23:53.880]  But they were just coming onto my place and wandering around, going in my buildings and
[01:23:53.880 --> 01:23:57.560]  everything else, and I'm like, you need to get the hell out of here.
[01:23:57.560 --> 01:23:58.560]  Criminal trespass.
[01:23:58.560 --> 01:23:59.560]  Well, we have...
[01:23:59.560 --> 01:24:00.560]  Exactly.
[01:24:00.560 --> 01:24:01.560]  On the...
[01:24:01.560 --> 01:24:02.560]  What?
[01:24:02.560 --> 01:24:09.800]  The trespass 50,000 fine, and the two policemen came up a month ago on Friday morning to say
[01:24:09.800 --> 01:24:12.600]  you need to go take care of this, or we're going to come back and arrest you, or walk
[01:24:12.600 --> 01:24:14.600]  right by them.
[01:24:14.600 --> 01:24:22.000]  Well, if they can make the claim of being on some official governmental business that
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:27.920]  requires them to enter the property, then they can be there if there's an actual warrant.
[01:24:27.920 --> 01:24:33.400]  And if there was no warrant in existence when they entered, they've got a problem.
[01:24:33.400 --> 01:24:39.040]  Well, I haven't had any yet to see a warrant, but it would turn into the failure to appear
[01:24:39.040 --> 01:24:43.240]  program with the driver's license renewal.
[01:24:43.240 --> 01:24:45.240]  Did you fail to appear?
[01:24:45.240 --> 01:24:51.720]  I did back in December a year, over a year ago, a year and a half now, a year, four months.
[01:24:51.720 --> 01:24:53.840]  Okay.
[01:24:53.840 --> 01:24:57.320]  So what's the issue there?
[01:24:57.320 --> 01:24:59.760]  The people you're listening to or what?
[01:24:59.760 --> 01:25:00.760]  Why didn't you show up?
[01:25:00.760 --> 01:25:05.560]  Well, the people I listened to, for one plus the other, I said I never agreed to show up.
[01:25:05.560 --> 01:25:08.400]  I just refused to contract, but that's a different story.
[01:25:08.400 --> 01:25:09.400]  Okay.
[01:25:09.400 --> 01:25:13.120]  I'm going to throw this out there for everybody that's listening, including you in this case,
[01:25:13.120 --> 01:25:15.680]  though at the moment it's not going to do you a lot of good.
[01:25:15.680 --> 01:25:24.000]  Folks, when someone gives you information about do this, do this, and do this in your case,
[01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:30.120]  the first thing you need to say is show me the statute that backs up what you're saying
[01:25:30.120 --> 01:25:34.480]  or the case law that backs up what you're saying.
[01:25:34.480 --> 01:25:38.880]  Because the first time they say, oh, you don't need any of that, the courts, they have to
[01:25:38.880 --> 01:25:40.480]  do it this way.
[01:25:40.480 --> 01:25:49.600]  Bologna, Bologna, you are definitely listening to the wrong guru.
[01:25:49.600 --> 01:25:54.520]  There is no silver bullet.
[01:25:54.520 --> 01:25:56.240]  There isn't.
[01:25:56.240 --> 01:26:00.720]  There is no golden parachute.
[01:26:00.720 --> 01:26:08.200]  You either play by the rules that binds them down or you get your butt kicked in the game.
[01:26:08.200 --> 01:26:15.720]  You do not play football by basketball rules.
[01:26:15.720 --> 01:26:16.720]  That help?
[01:26:16.720 --> 01:26:17.720]  Yeah.
[01:26:17.720 --> 01:26:18.720]  Okay.
[01:26:18.720 --> 01:26:27.760]  All right, so what exactly is the issue that you went through today?
[01:26:27.760 --> 01:26:28.760]  The issue?
[01:26:28.760 --> 01:26:33.520]  Well, I said there's a court, a jury trial set up for July, but I'm thinking of I'm just
[01:26:33.520 --> 01:26:39.640]  going to mail in a motion to dismiss and say go ahead and sign it and send it out.
[01:26:39.640 --> 01:26:40.640]  Okay.
[01:26:40.640 --> 01:26:43.720]  What's going to be your legal basis for demanding the dismissal?
[01:26:43.720 --> 01:26:49.000]  They've never answered any of my affidavits, they've never proved it.
[01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:50.000]  Okay.
[01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:55.280]  I asked you what the legal basis is, not what the theoretical guru basis is.
[01:26:55.280 --> 01:26:58.560]  They don't have to prove it.
[01:26:58.560 --> 01:27:08.560]  What have you filed that argues Texas law on the subject matter of jurisdiction, notice,
[01:27:08.560 --> 01:27:10.720]  and criminal acts by the dog catcher?
[01:27:10.720 --> 01:27:15.560]  By the dog catcher, not by the court.
[01:27:15.560 --> 01:27:19.920]  If you're asserting the dog catcher, let the dogs out, did the dog catcher have to trespass
[01:27:19.920 --> 01:27:20.920]  to do it?
[01:27:20.920 --> 01:27:23.240]  Well, of course he did.
[01:27:23.240 --> 01:27:27.120]  Okay then, make the assertion, let him defend.
[01:27:27.120 --> 01:27:34.320]  Congressman, I have no proof that he let the dogs out.
[01:27:34.320 --> 01:27:39.720]  That is not the issue here, you're the one being accused.
[01:27:39.720 --> 01:27:42.440]  There is their proof that your dogs were out.
[01:27:42.440 --> 01:27:46.360]  There isn't any, just his testimony.
[01:27:46.360 --> 01:27:48.640]  Where's the proof he didn't let them out?
[01:27:48.640 --> 01:27:51.200]  They don't have any of that either, do they?
[01:27:51.200 --> 01:27:52.200]  No.
[01:27:52.200 --> 01:27:54.680]  So make the assertion and make him fight.
[01:27:54.680 --> 01:28:03.360]  Okay, they don't have to rebut any affidavits that have been put into the court case?
[01:28:03.360 --> 01:28:06.680]  An unrebutted affidavit according to law stands as fact.
[01:28:06.680 --> 01:28:13.720]  The question is, is do the fact you're asserting have a damn thing to do with the case itself?
[01:28:13.720 --> 01:28:18.960]  If they don't address specific factual merits of the case, then they have nothing to do
[01:28:18.960 --> 01:28:19.960]  with the case.
[01:28:19.960 --> 01:28:25.240]  So the fact that I'm not a corporation doesn't matter.
[01:28:25.240 --> 01:28:30.960]  Has no bearing whatsoever unless you have actual evidence that that's what you're being
[01:28:30.960 --> 01:28:32.520]  treated as.
[01:28:32.520 --> 01:28:38.480]  You don't, you have some cockamamie ass legal theory that these so-called know-it-alls have
[01:28:38.480 --> 01:28:45.120]  concocted based upon a partial illiterate reading of a statute.
[01:28:45.120 --> 01:28:49.560]  And I guarantee you that's what it is, because I've read the statute they're trying to use
[01:28:49.560 --> 01:28:58.520]  to make that argument in Texas, and it does not say what they're trying to say it says.
[01:28:58.520 --> 01:29:00.520]  Okay.
[01:29:00.520 --> 01:29:08.080]  That's the problem with not learning how to read a statute and apply it in accordance
[01:29:08.080 --> 01:29:11.720]  with common sense and the other rules.
[01:29:11.720 --> 01:29:18.160]  If you take one rule by itself, then it will mean something possibly based upon the way
[01:29:18.160 --> 01:29:24.520]  it's written, completely different than it can mean if it's read in context with the
[01:29:24.520 --> 01:29:32.520]  surrounding rules and other in paramatera meaning related rules on the same subject.
[01:29:32.520 --> 01:29:34.520]  Okay.
[01:29:34.520 --> 01:29:35.520]  All right.
[01:29:35.520 --> 01:29:40.520]  And these guys that are giving you this advice aren't doing that.
[01:29:40.520 --> 01:29:41.520]  No.
[01:29:41.520 --> 01:29:43.520]  Well, I got one more issue, so I'll get the contact.
[01:29:43.520 --> 01:29:44.520]  Okay.
[01:29:44.520 --> 01:29:46.520]  Hang on there and we'll get you on the other side of the break, because you're stood in
[01:29:46.520 --> 01:29:47.520]  and we call them the guys.
[01:29:47.520 --> 01:29:48.520]  All right, folks.
[01:29:48.520 --> 01:29:50.520]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:29:50.520 --> 01:29:54.520]  Call in numbers 512-646-1980, as soon as we're done with Stephen.
[01:29:54.520 --> 01:29:57.520]  I'm going back to the affidavit unless I got more of you on the board.
[01:29:57.520 --> 01:30:00.520]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.520 --> 01:30:05.520]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:30:05.520 --> 01:30:07.520]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:30:07.520 --> 01:30:12.520]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:30:12.520 --> 01:30:15.520]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:30:15.520 --> 01:30:18.520]  And thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[01:30:18.520 --> 01:30:20.520]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:30:20.520 --> 01:30:21.520]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:30:21.520 --> 01:30:22.520]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:30:22.520 --> 01:30:23.520]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:30:23.520 --> 01:30:25.520]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:30:25.520 --> 01:30:27.520]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[01:30:27.520 --> 01:30:56.520]  Don't go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:30:57.520 --> 01:31:01.520]  Let's see what our powders, sieves, and oil can do for you.
[01:31:01.520 --> 01:31:04.520]  More energy.
[01:31:04.520 --> 01:31:06.520]  Stronger immune power.
[01:31:06.520 --> 01:31:09.520]  Improved sense of well-being.
[01:31:09.520 --> 01:31:13.520]  How many supplements have you heard boast of these benefits?
[01:31:13.520 --> 01:31:18.520]  The team behind Centrition believes that supplements should over-deliver on their promises.
[01:31:18.520 --> 01:31:22.520]  And Centrition does just that.
[01:31:22.520 --> 01:31:26.520]  Centrition utilizes the ancient healing wisdom of Chinese medicine.
[01:31:26.520 --> 01:31:32.520]  In conjunction with the science of modern nutrition, adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component.
[01:31:32.520 --> 01:31:38.520]  And organic hemp protein and greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base.
[01:31:38.520 --> 01:31:42.520]  Plus, Centrition tastes great in just water.
[01:31:42.520 --> 01:31:46.520]  This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product.
[01:31:46.520 --> 01:31:48.520]  And it's all natural.
[01:31:48.520 --> 01:31:57.520]  Visit Centrition.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436.
[01:31:57.520 --> 01:32:21.520]  After you use Centrition, you'll believe in supplements again.
[01:32:21.520 --> 01:32:28.520]  We are back. This is rule of law radio. We got about a half an hour left in the show, and we are going to be finishing up with Stephen in Texas.
[01:32:28.520 --> 01:32:30.520]  All right, Stephen, let's continue on.
[01:32:30.520 --> 01:32:34.520]  Okay.
[01:32:34.520 --> 01:32:38.520]  All right, so what else are you going to do with this?
[01:32:38.520 --> 01:32:44.520]  Well, I was thinking of sending the motion dismissing, but it doesn't sound like there's a...
[01:32:44.520 --> 01:32:47.520]  I've laid any groundwork for it.
[01:32:47.520 --> 01:32:50.520]  So, lay some now.
[01:32:50.520 --> 01:33:00.520]  There's nothing preventing you laying specific facts of law in the motion to dismiss that would require them to do so?
[01:33:00.520 --> 01:33:04.520]  Facts of law. Their law, constitutional law.
[01:33:04.520 --> 01:33:07.520]  Are you going to corn under any other kind?
[01:33:07.520 --> 01:33:09.520]  No.
[01:33:09.520 --> 01:33:11.520]  Okay, then.
[01:33:11.520 --> 01:33:13.520]  Yes, you have to go in.
[01:33:13.520 --> 01:33:21.520]  The first thing you're going to do is address due process violations. You never go to merits that there are outstanding due process violations.
[01:33:21.520 --> 01:33:29.520]  Because first and foremost, the court of appeals is going to look at whether or not it was a fair and impartial trial.
[01:33:29.520 --> 01:33:42.520]  The court had established proper jurisdiction, whether or not the accused had received proper sufficient and timely notice and raised any objections to the court's failure to provide any of those things.
[01:33:42.520 --> 01:33:47.520]  Where are your objections to those things?
[01:33:47.520 --> 01:33:55.520]  Lack of notice. Lack of a proper trial or a fair and impartial trial. Anything prejudicial done by the judge.
[01:33:55.520 --> 01:34:04.520]  Who signed the complaint? Was it the dog catcher or one of the clerks of the court? So on and so forth.
[01:34:04.520 --> 01:34:07.520]  Okay.
[01:34:07.520 --> 01:34:16.520]  If the clerk of the court signed it, then the court is involved in the case as a witness for the state and they're disqualified.
[01:34:16.520 --> 01:34:23.520]  The judge can't be both a witness and the presiding judge of the case.
[01:34:23.520 --> 01:34:26.520]  Now the candidate prosecuting attorney.
[01:34:26.520 --> 01:34:29.520]  Correct.
[01:34:29.520 --> 01:34:38.520]  And through agency the clerk of the court is doing exactly that. Plus there's another problem if the clerk signed the complaint.
[01:34:38.520 --> 01:34:44.520]  The separation of powers issue is one and access to the court record is another.
[01:34:44.520 --> 01:34:58.520]  How are you getting a fair and impartial trial when states complaining witness that instituted the action against you is also the person responsible for the safekeeping of the record being made against you.
[01:34:58.520 --> 01:35:04.520]  How is that not a conflict of interest if the clerk signatures on the complaint?
[01:35:04.520 --> 01:35:14.520]  How can the complainant be the person who is in charge of keeping an accurate record for the purpose of appeal?
[01:35:14.520 --> 01:35:16.520]  See the problem?
[01:35:16.520 --> 01:35:24.520]  That screams due process violation to high heaven.
[01:35:24.520 --> 01:35:28.520]  Okay.
[01:35:28.520 --> 01:35:38.520]  I've got another issue that was done with some of the same bad advice for not showing up with the neutral response.
[01:35:38.520 --> 01:35:52.520]  And this, I was listening to you last week and it definitely had no basis for stopping me to begin with because it was a expired utility trailer tag.
[01:35:52.520 --> 01:35:58.520]  Okay. How are you saying that that an expired registration?
[01:35:58.520 --> 01:36:01.520]  Right.
[01:36:01.520 --> 01:36:03.520]  Okay.
[01:36:03.520 --> 01:36:11.520]  Yeah, the stops illegal because registration is not in subtitle C. In order to stop you for that he would have had to have had a warrant.
[01:36:11.520 --> 01:36:13.520]  He had no warrant.
[01:36:13.520 --> 01:36:15.520]  Well, of course he didn't have a warrant. That's never the point.
[01:36:15.520 --> 01:36:16.520]  Yeah.
[01:36:16.520 --> 01:36:26.520]  So they don't have warrants. They're treating the entire transportation code as if they have blanket authority to enforce every provision of it without a warrant.
[01:36:26.520 --> 01:36:28.520]  And they don't.
[01:36:28.520 --> 01:36:40.520]  Subtitle C, right there in 543.001. Subtitle C runs chapter 541 through chapter 600.
[01:36:40.520 --> 01:36:46.520]  That is all the chapters that are encompassed by subtitle C rules of the road.
[01:36:46.520 --> 01:36:54.520]  And the authority to arrest without warrant is specifically granted in 543.001.
[01:36:54.520 --> 01:37:06.520]  And it reads, any peace officer may arrest without warrant any person found committing a violation of this subtitle.
[01:37:06.520 --> 01:37:15.520]  So the authority to arrest without warrant was specifically limited to subtitle C offenses by the language of the legislature.
[01:37:15.520 --> 01:37:27.520]  They're going to try to say that 5 or 14.01 B allows an officer to arrest for any offense committed in his viewer in his presence.
[01:37:27.520 --> 01:37:29.520]  My argument is this.
[01:37:29.520 --> 01:37:47.520]  The Code of Criminal Procedure 14.01 B is a general statute. 543.001 is local and specific, which means it prevails over the general unless there is language to the contrary that states the general provision controls.
[01:37:47.520 --> 01:37:49.520]  There isn't any.
[01:37:49.520 --> 01:38:11.520]  Therefore, the presumption of the courts must be the legislature knew what they were doing when they created the local provision and the transportation code saying the subtitle C offenses are the only ones we grant authority to perform arrest without warrant over.
[01:38:11.520 --> 01:38:19.520]  Otherwise, there's no need for 543 whatsoever 14.01 B would have been sufficient.
[01:38:19.520 --> 01:38:25.520]  There would be no need for a local provision if the general provision control.
[01:38:25.520 --> 01:38:27.520]  So it doesn't.
[01:38:27.520 --> 01:38:29.520]  The local provision does.
[01:38:29.520 --> 01:38:39.520]  And they specifically limited warrantless arrest authority to subtitle C offenses.
[01:38:39.520 --> 01:38:42.520]  Which is not registration.
[01:38:42.520 --> 01:38:49.520]  No registrations in 502 well outside of 541 to 600.
[01:38:49.520 --> 01:38:51.520]  No driver's license is in 521.
[01:38:51.520 --> 01:38:53.520]  That's well outside.
[01:38:53.520 --> 01:38:54.520]  Yeah.
[01:38:54.520 --> 01:38:57.520]  No proof of financial responsibility is in 601.
[01:38:57.520 --> 01:38:59.520]  That's outside.
[01:38:59.520 --> 01:39:04.520]  That makes none of those offenses arrestable without a warrant.
[01:39:04.520 --> 01:39:08.520]  And DPS officers are saying all the time I'll set a list of two and discuss it.
[01:39:08.520 --> 01:39:12.520]  Yeah, if I catch them without proof of insurance, I arrest them immediately.
[01:39:12.520 --> 01:39:17.520]  If I catch them without proof of insurance and no driver's license, I arrest them immediately.
[01:39:17.520 --> 01:39:19.520]  And I walk up to them and I start a conversation with them.
[01:39:19.520 --> 01:39:26.520]  I say, you guys realize that if you're arresting these people without a warrant under these provisions, the arrest is illegal.
[01:39:26.520 --> 01:39:28.520]  And they go, well, how do you figure that?
[01:39:28.520 --> 01:39:30.520]  And so I explain it to them just like I did to you.
[01:39:30.520 --> 01:39:36.520]  543 limits your warrantless arrest authority to subtitle C offenses only.
[01:39:36.520 --> 01:39:43.520]  And the ones you're naming off aren't in subtitle C.
[01:39:43.520 --> 01:39:50.520]  So see, you have a whole list of things the law gave you to beat the living crap out of them with.
[01:39:50.520 --> 01:39:51.520]  Yep.
[01:39:51.520 --> 01:39:58.520]  You don't need idiotic legal theory that has no basis in factual law.
[01:39:58.520 --> 01:40:06.520]  I guess I'm just now woken up in that and well, here they never sent, like I said, I sent it back new to response.
[01:40:06.520 --> 01:40:14.520]  They never sent, they never sent a, what is it, a true bill, cause of action, anything.
[01:40:14.520 --> 01:40:22.520]  They never sent any paperwork till a year later, a month ago, when they sent a postcard,
[01:40:22.520 --> 01:40:27.520]  they're a warrant for your arrest.
[01:40:27.520 --> 01:40:28.520]  Okay.
[01:40:28.520 --> 01:40:36.520]  Well, what obligation do they have to respond to a piece of paperwork that does not deal with the issues relevant to your case?
[01:40:36.520 --> 01:40:40.520]  Are they not supposed to give me a proper notice of the case?
[01:40:40.520 --> 01:40:41.520]  Well, sure they are.
[01:40:41.520 --> 01:40:44.520]  But did you make an argument of no proper notice?
[01:40:44.520 --> 01:40:47.520]  I've never been in there to make any kind of argument.
[01:40:47.520 --> 01:40:53.520]  Did you file any paperwork documenting lack of notice?
[01:40:53.520 --> 01:41:00.520]  No, I sent the ticket back saying that I failed to understand and, you know...
[01:41:00.520 --> 01:41:01.520]  Let me guess.
[01:41:01.520 --> 01:41:04.520]  And then you insinuated stand under, right?
[01:41:04.520 --> 01:41:05.520]  No.
[01:41:05.520 --> 01:41:08.520]  Just a fear of false personating.
[01:41:08.520 --> 01:41:09.520]  Well, come on.
[01:41:09.520 --> 01:41:11.520]  You fell for all these other patriot arguments.
[01:41:11.520 --> 01:41:12.520]  Why not that one?
[01:41:12.520 --> 01:41:13.520]  No.
[01:41:13.520 --> 01:41:17.520]  That's why I told the judge, she said several times today, I said, do you understand this?
[01:41:17.520 --> 01:41:22.520]  I said, no, I'm not going to understand this.
[01:41:22.520 --> 01:41:29.520]  Well, the issue here is if you keep doing that, they're going to have you declared incompetent.
[01:41:29.520 --> 01:41:33.520]  Then they're going to get you legal counsel who's going to throw you under the bus.
[01:41:33.520 --> 01:41:34.520]  Yeah.
[01:41:34.520 --> 01:41:36.520]  Then they're going to have you mentally evaluated.
[01:41:36.520 --> 01:41:40.520]  They're going to find some way to make that stick.
[01:41:40.520 --> 01:41:48.520]  And when they do, some state idiot's going to get control of all your property.
[01:41:48.520 --> 01:41:56.520]  So, you need to be aware that there are penalties for playing this game the wrong way, much more severe than a traffic fine?
[01:41:56.520 --> 01:41:57.520]  Yep.
[01:41:57.520 --> 01:42:04.520]  So, I understand that that's one reason I wanted to go into their court, other than the fact that they're all crooks.
[01:42:04.520 --> 01:42:14.520]  There's nothing wrong with going into their court as long as you know the rules of the game and you prepare accordingly.
[01:42:14.520 --> 01:42:16.520]  It's that simple.
[01:42:16.520 --> 01:42:24.520]  It requires that you read and you put two and two together in a way that they can't make it out of the five.
[01:42:24.520 --> 01:42:32.520]  And then you document that argument that two and two is four and you can't fake it.
[01:42:32.520 --> 01:42:40.520]  That's what it's about, documentation, presenting a truth that they cannot rebut.
[01:42:40.520 --> 01:42:46.520]  But the truth has to have relevance.
[01:42:46.520 --> 01:42:50.520]  It has to be backed up with something substantial.
[01:42:50.520 --> 01:42:59.520]  Your opinion and your theory don't mean squat if you don't have what they call law behind it.
[01:42:59.520 --> 01:43:03.520]  Yep.
[01:43:03.520 --> 01:43:12.520]  All right. So, I would start figuring out what those rules are. I'd begin with the code of criminal procedure and find out where they've screwed up so far.
[01:43:12.520 --> 01:43:18.520]  And I guarantee you the list is substantial. And I've already named off at least three of them to you.
[01:43:18.520 --> 01:43:26.520]  Yeah, that's on the stop when he put his hand on his gun and said hand them to me or go to jail so he threatened me right there.
[01:43:26.520 --> 01:43:31.520]  Nope. He can't threaten you into something that you've already agreed to.
[01:43:31.520 --> 01:43:34.520]  Well, I never agreed to hand him the driver's license, silly.
[01:43:34.520 --> 01:43:37.520]  No, you have the driver's license, don't you?
[01:43:37.520 --> 01:43:39.520]  Okay, I see.
[01:43:39.520 --> 01:43:43.520]  Did you agree that you were not? Did you tell him I'm not using it?
[01:43:43.520 --> 01:43:46.520]  I told him I'm not using it. I said I have it. I'm not in commerce.
[01:43:46.520 --> 01:43:49.520]  Okay, hang on just a second. We'll be right back.
[01:43:49.520 --> 01:43:54.520]  All right, callers, we see you on the board. Hang on. I will get this wrapped up and get to the couple of callers we got left.
[01:43:54.520 --> 01:44:00.520]  Doug, Ryan, hold on. We'll be right back after the break.
[01:44:00.520 --> 01:44:04.520]  Hey, did you hear? Ron Paul has announced he's running for president in 2012.
[01:44:04.520 --> 01:44:05.520]  It is Ron Paul.
[01:44:05.520 --> 01:44:11.520]  Really? Okay, put down the cell phone for one minute. Your friends really don't care about your Twitter updates on what you had for breakfast.
[01:44:11.520 --> 01:44:14.520]  Oh, but I'd love to make those little smiley faces with punctuation marks.
[01:44:14.520 --> 01:44:21.520]  Of course you do. Now, listen closely. You need to go down to Brave New Books and learn as much as you can about Ron Paul and his message before it's too late.
[01:44:21.520 --> 01:44:29.520]  They have all of his books and many of the books he talks about. They also have t-shirts, bumper stickers, and yard signs so that you can show your support for him during the campaign.
[01:44:29.520 --> 01:44:31.520]  Look, do they have Harry Potter and Twilight?
[01:44:31.520 --> 01:44:37.520]  No, but they do carry a large selection of survival and preparedness books to protect your family in time of emergency.
[01:44:37.520 --> 01:44:40.520]  Ugh, that sounds like that show on the Discovery Channel.
[01:44:40.520 --> 01:44:48.520]  Yeah, there's even a wilderness survival expert that teaches classes called Earth Skills School that you can sign up for on the website bravenewbookstore.com. What are you doing?
[01:44:48.520 --> 01:44:54.520]  I'm tweeting all my friends that they should go to bravenewbookstore.com or down to the bookstore in person. Where's it located?
[01:44:54.520 --> 01:44:56.520]  1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:44:56.520 --> 01:44:58.520]  There, it's sent. I even made a smiley face.
[01:44:58.520 --> 01:45:00.520]  Great.
[01:45:28.520 --> 01:45:37.520]  To add to your storage shelter, we urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org. And remember, all of our products are chemical free and healthy to eat.
[01:45:37.520 --> 01:45:46.520]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality, and rapid shipping anywhere. And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:45:46.520 --> 01:46:01.520]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608. That's 908-6912608. See what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:46:01.520 --> 01:46:26.520]  Hi, folks. We are back. Once again, this is Rule of Law Radio. Okay, we're going to finish up with Stephen, and then we're going to get to our other two callers.
[01:46:26.520 --> 01:46:31.520]  This is our last segment, so we're not going to have time to get any new callers on the board, I don't think.
[01:46:31.520 --> 01:46:33.520]  All right, Stephen, let's get this wrapped up.
[01:46:33.520 --> 01:46:35.520]  Okay.
[01:46:35.520 --> 01:46:38.520]  All right. Do you have some place to start now you can live with?
[01:46:38.520 --> 01:46:40.520]  I think so.
[01:46:40.520 --> 01:46:46.520]  And the next time you get a legal guru giving you advice, what's the first questions out of your mouth?
[01:46:46.520 --> 01:46:49.520]  Show me where it says it in the rules and the law.
[01:46:49.520 --> 01:46:56.520]  Yes. And the first one that says you don't need any of that stuff, your recommendation would be?
[01:46:56.520 --> 01:46:59.520]  My recommendation would be to flee.
[01:46:59.520 --> 01:47:00.520]  Believe them.
[01:47:00.520 --> 01:47:07.520]  Yeah. Take a hike. Your advice is not worth a paper. It ain't even printed on.
[01:47:07.520 --> 01:47:13.520]  Okay. This advice is good for wiping your butt if you can find a tree to make paper with first.
[01:47:13.520 --> 01:47:17.520]  All right. Well, I appreciate it.
[01:47:17.520 --> 01:47:19.520]  All right. Thanks for calling in.
[01:47:19.520 --> 01:47:21.520]  Yeah, I'll call back later.
[01:47:21.520 --> 01:47:27.520]  All right. Okay, now we're going to go to Ryan and then we got Doug if we got time left.
[01:47:27.520 --> 01:47:29.520]  Ryan, what can we do for you?
[01:47:29.520 --> 01:47:40.520]  Well, I wanted to know what the statute of limitations is for getting information because I believe that the Court of Duty Hobbs,
[01:47:40.520 --> 01:47:51.520]  precinct four in Taylor, arrested me under false premises.
[01:47:51.520 --> 01:47:57.520]  Okay, wait a minute. You want to know what the statute of limitations is for getting information? There isn't any.
[01:47:57.520 --> 01:48:03.520]  The statute of limitations pursuing for something depends upon the level of the offense.
[01:48:03.520 --> 01:48:06.520]  It is the criminal mischief.
[01:48:06.520 --> 01:48:07.520]  They said I...
[01:48:07.520 --> 01:48:08.520]  Them or you?
[01:48:08.520 --> 01:48:15.520]  Me. They said I cracked their door when I shut the door.
[01:48:15.520 --> 01:48:18.520]  Well, their door hinge was broken.
[01:48:18.520 --> 01:48:22.520]  Who is they?
[01:48:22.520 --> 01:48:29.520]  This is the Court of Duty Hobbs in Taylor, Texas in Wheaton County.
[01:48:29.520 --> 01:48:34.520]  Yeah, I don't know if that tends to shake people, but I don't think it would shake you.
[01:48:34.520 --> 01:48:43.520]  I didn't see the door break, but I went back in the next week on another ticket and basically they said
[01:48:43.520 --> 01:49:00.520]  I couldn't bring up any of the issues from the past where I'd gone in before and they searched my bag without any sort of...
[01:49:00.520 --> 01:49:04.520]  Search your bag where? Where were you when it was searched?
[01:49:04.520 --> 01:49:09.520]  In the front of their court building.
[01:49:09.520 --> 01:49:13.520]  Okay, were you entered or was this outside?
[01:49:13.520 --> 01:49:18.520]  I was inside the building, but I wasn't in the courtroom proper. I was in the lobby.
[01:49:18.520 --> 01:49:23.520]  Okay, and don't they have a signpost saying that if you enter, they're going to search?
[01:49:23.520 --> 01:49:26.520]  I did not see any such sign.
[01:49:26.520 --> 01:49:29.520]  Does that mean it doesn't exist?
[01:49:29.520 --> 01:49:37.520]  I can go back and look and see if there's any sort of sign there, but they satisfied themselves.
[01:49:37.520 --> 01:49:44.520]  There was nothing in my bag besides my computer and some papers.
[01:49:44.520 --> 01:49:50.520]  I went in, then I came back out and they told me they were arresting me for criminal mischief because the previous week
[01:49:50.520 --> 01:49:53.520]  I had broken the glass in the door.
[01:49:53.520 --> 01:49:57.520]  I said, well, I don't think the glass is broken right now, so we've had it fixed.
[01:49:57.520 --> 01:49:59.520]  Okay, when was this?
[01:49:59.520 --> 01:50:03.520]  This was the summer of 2009.
[01:50:03.520 --> 01:50:06.520]  And when did they say? Okay.
[01:50:06.520 --> 01:50:09.520]  Have they prosecuted you on it?
[01:50:09.520 --> 01:50:12.520]  Yes, they did.
[01:50:12.520 --> 01:50:19.520]  Did you do any discovery to get any courtroom video because those courthouses usually have cameras in them?
[01:50:19.520 --> 01:50:22.520]  I would like to do that.
[01:50:22.520 --> 01:50:27.520]  Do they do an open records request to the court for video if they still have it?
[01:50:27.520 --> 01:50:32.520]  I don't know what the length of time is they're required to maintain video monitoring the hallways.
[01:50:32.520 --> 01:50:37.520]  Okay, well, what about any records that they would have as far as their maintenance?
[01:50:37.520 --> 01:50:46.520]  You know, someone came and if the door was ever broken, if the glass was in fact ever broken, then they would have somebody that would be there.
[01:50:46.520 --> 01:50:54.520]  And you'll have to do an open records request for any maintenance or repair records to that particular door and see what they have.
[01:50:54.520 --> 01:51:02.520]  They may have them archived, in which case they'll have to tell you what they've done with them, but they may have destroyed them if it's after a certain amount of time.
[01:51:02.520 --> 01:51:11.520]  You would have to look in the statutes or whatever authority they have to maintain those records under.
[01:51:11.520 --> 01:51:16.520]  And where would I find these statutes?
[01:51:16.520 --> 01:51:27.520]  Well, some of them will be local procedures of the court, which will be if it's a municipal court, it will be whatever the municipality is set up for that court.
[01:51:27.520 --> 01:51:34.520]  Other will be state law statutes for record keeping of the administrative nature on the court.
[01:51:34.520 --> 01:51:40.520]  So you'll look under local government code if it's a JP court.
[01:51:40.520 --> 01:51:41.520]  Okay.
[01:51:41.520 --> 01:51:42.520]  Is this online?
[01:51:42.520 --> 01:51:43.520]  It's a JP court.
[01:51:43.520 --> 01:51:44.520]  Is it online somewhere?
[01:51:44.520 --> 01:51:47.520]  The Texas statutes are online, yes.
[01:51:47.520 --> 01:51:48.520]  Okay.
[01:51:48.520 --> 01:52:00.520]  Go to www.texas.gov, go to government, or go to discover or discovery, and then look for laws, codes, and statutes, and then laws, codes, and statutes again.
[01:52:00.520 --> 01:52:06.520]  That'll take you to the primary page where you can locate the Constitution and the statutes posted online.
[01:52:06.520 --> 01:52:07.520]  Okay.
[01:52:07.520 --> 01:52:14.520]  All right, and I don't want to take any time away from Doug there who's online, but are you available offline to discuss those?
[01:52:14.520 --> 01:52:16.520]  Uh, not right now.
[01:52:16.520 --> 01:52:20.520]  I'm not because I'm still doing paperwork for folks, and I've been paid to do that.
[01:52:20.520 --> 01:52:27.520]  So unless you're going to throw money in the pot to buy part of the time, then I'm allocated to other folks at the moment.
[01:52:27.520 --> 01:52:28.520]  Sure.
[01:52:28.520 --> 01:52:29.520]  I'll throw money in the pot.
[01:52:29.520 --> 01:52:30.520]  No problem.
[01:52:30.520 --> 01:52:31.520]  Okay.
[01:52:31.520 --> 01:52:35.520]  Send me a contact email then, and I'll get with you and we'll make arrangements for whatever.
[01:52:35.520 --> 01:52:36.520]  Fair enough.
[01:52:36.520 --> 01:52:37.520]  Okay.
[01:52:37.520 --> 01:52:38.520]  Fair enough.
[01:52:38.520 --> 01:52:39.520]  Okay.
[01:52:39.520 --> 01:52:40.520]  All right, Ryan.
[01:52:40.520 --> 01:52:41.520]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:52:41.520 --> 01:52:42.520]  All right.
[01:52:42.520 --> 01:52:44.520]  Now we're going to go to Doug.
[01:52:44.520 --> 01:52:46.520]  Doug, you got about six minutes.
[01:52:46.520 --> 01:52:48.520]  What can we do for you?
[01:52:48.520 --> 01:52:49.520]  Okay.
[01:52:49.520 --> 01:52:53.520]  What can you do for me in six minutes?
[01:52:53.520 --> 01:53:03.520]  I had a guy call me up today, and I've heard that you're real special about getting tickets or something.
[01:53:03.520 --> 01:53:09.520]  I guess he heard about me beating my little open container ticket or whatever, and he said,
[01:53:09.520 --> 01:53:14.520]  is there any way that I could possibly eat this ticket?
[01:53:14.520 --> 01:53:30.520]  He said, I stopped by a county sheriff in Bastrop County, and he wrote me up a ticket for driving with this and that and, you know, spend the license.
[01:53:30.520 --> 01:53:33.520]  And I told him, I said, yeah, you can.
[01:53:33.520 --> 01:53:36.520]  You can go see Eddie Craig.
[01:53:36.520 --> 01:53:39.520]  I had a great new book.
[01:53:39.520 --> 01:53:41.520]  He knew what it is.
[01:53:41.520 --> 01:53:44.520]  He said, oh yeah, that's my favorite bookstore.
[01:53:44.520 --> 01:53:46.520]  They're all the time.
[01:53:46.520 --> 01:53:57.520]  But apparently he didn't listen to the radio, and he's not familiar with the fact that you have your seminar and that's not another.
[01:53:57.520 --> 01:54:03.520]  I glued him in, and he said, well, you're real knowledgeable about all this.
[01:54:03.520 --> 01:54:08.520]  And I said, well, the most knowledge I have about this, I got from Eddie.
[01:54:08.520 --> 01:54:13.520]  So you can go avail yourself of Eddie's knowledge.
[01:54:13.520 --> 01:54:20.520]  Sunday between two and five at Braden and the books.
[01:54:20.520 --> 01:54:27.520]  So yeah, I'll be down there Sunday.
[01:54:27.520 --> 01:54:28.520]  All right.
[01:54:28.520 --> 01:54:33.520]  Well, I appreciate the direction that you're sending them in, most assuredly.
[01:54:33.520 --> 01:54:39.520]  If you'll let me know what he's there for, I'll do what I can to get him headed in the right direction.
[01:54:39.520 --> 01:54:48.520]  If you do talk to him again, though, make sure that he knows to bring every piece of paperwork, the ticket, anything he's got associated with it, or his case.
[01:54:48.520 --> 01:54:50.520]  He needs to bring all of it with him.
[01:54:50.520 --> 01:54:51.520]  Right.
[01:54:51.520 --> 01:54:54.520]  And bring up money, too.
[01:54:54.520 --> 01:54:55.520]  And I'll bring with me.
[01:54:55.520 --> 01:54:57.520]  Yeah, that wouldn't hurt, either.
[01:54:57.520 --> 01:54:58.520]  See, right.
[01:54:58.520 --> 01:54:59.520]  Uh-huh.
[01:54:59.520 --> 01:55:00.520]  Seein' that, Eddie.
[01:55:00.520 --> 01:55:01.520]  All right.
[01:55:01.520 --> 01:55:06.520]  You know, live for free, and you know, we would have.
[01:55:06.520 --> 01:55:19.520]  But the gas city was stopped by a fat county, you know, Sheriff's deputy in Bastrop County, this jurisdiction doesn't matter anymore.
[01:55:19.520 --> 01:55:26.520]  Uh, well, Texas courts say he cannot enforce in a county that's not his own.
[01:55:26.520 --> 01:55:32.520]  He's not a law enforcement officer except in his own county.
[01:55:32.520 --> 01:55:36.520]  I understand the jurisdiction, I understand.
[01:55:36.520 --> 01:55:43.520]  And I've heard a little constable running for office talking about how they go out and do this and that.
[01:55:43.520 --> 01:56:00.520]  They're in their precinct, and they might be able to serve paper somewhere else, but as far as having the jurisdiction done, like you said, in the way station, I learned that from you.
[01:56:00.520 --> 01:56:08.520]  They're pretty well youthless as far as traffic fractions go.
[01:56:08.520 --> 01:56:09.520]  Yeah.
[01:56:09.520 --> 01:56:26.520]  But anyway, I just thought, let's know if gas come there and he's got, you know, he thought, oh, the guru of all traffic, whatever, because I've made a few wraps in Bastrop.
[01:56:26.520 --> 01:56:32.520]  And sort of a legend in my mind or whatever.
[01:56:32.520 --> 01:56:33.520]  Yeah.
[01:56:33.520 --> 01:56:35.520]  That's another real legend, right?
[01:56:35.520 --> 01:56:37.520]  You know, because he's a real deal.
[01:56:37.520 --> 01:56:48.520]  So, you know, there's a little seminar, you know, you know, when I'm out mowing grass, you're studying a lot.
[01:56:48.520 --> 01:56:56.520]  Okay.
[01:56:56.520 --> 01:56:58.520]  All right.
[01:56:58.520 --> 01:57:02.520]  Well, appreciate that greatly.
[01:57:02.520 --> 01:57:04.520]  All right, anything else?
[01:57:04.520 --> 01:57:05.520]  What?
[01:57:05.520 --> 01:57:07.520]  Anything else?
[01:57:07.520 --> 01:57:10.520]  You can't put a cup on me, Eddie.
[01:57:10.520 --> 01:57:14.520]  I said, is there anything else?
[01:57:14.520 --> 01:57:19.520]  Yeah, my life is tough.
[01:57:19.520 --> 01:57:24.520]  I decided to give you that message.
[01:57:24.520 --> 01:57:26.520]  Okay.
[01:57:26.520 --> 01:57:30.520]  I'll be looking for your friend in at the bookstore on Sunday.
[01:57:30.520 --> 01:57:32.520]  All right.
[01:57:32.520 --> 01:57:33.520]  All right, Doug.
[01:57:33.520 --> 01:57:36.520]  Thanks for calling in, man.
[01:57:36.520 --> 01:57:45.520]  Hey, that was our last caller and just in time, we got about a minute and a half, which real soon here, the music is going to start and that'll be the end of it.
[01:57:45.520 --> 01:57:47.520]  And we'll start signing off.
[01:57:47.520 --> 01:57:49.520]  But folks, I want to thank you for listening.
[01:57:49.520 --> 01:57:54.520]  I want to thank everyone out there that has continued to donate for the legal fund.
[01:57:54.520 --> 01:57:56.520]  As you're able, please continue to do that.
[01:57:56.520 --> 01:58:05.520]  We will have the federal suit coming up because regardless of what occurs on the appeal, we still have federal causes of actions that can be adjudicated.
[01:58:05.520 --> 01:58:14.520]  When loser draw the court case, but I do not expect in any way to lose the court case on appeal.
[01:58:14.520 --> 01:58:17.520]  We may have to go to the courts of appeal to make that happen.
[01:58:17.520 --> 01:58:21.520]  But eventually it will be decided in our favor just like we figured it would.
[01:58:21.520 --> 01:58:23.520]  But again, thank you all for listening.
[01:58:23.520 --> 01:58:29.520]  And as one of my favorite Hollywood actors once said, Mr. John Wayne, life is hard.
[01:58:29.520 --> 01:58:31.520]  It's harder when you're stupid.
[01:58:31.520 --> 01:58:40.520]  So let's teach our public servants to stop being stupid because when they're stupid, it makes our life harder.
[01:58:40.520 --> 01:58:44.520]  This is Eddie Craig, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:58:44.520 --> 01:59:01.520]  God bless and good night.
[01:59:14.520 --> 01:59:27.520]  This is Eddie Craig, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, and Deborah Stevens.
[01:59:44.520 --> 01:59:51.520]  Call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:51.520 --> 01:59:55.520]  That's 888-551-0102.
[01:59:55.520 --> 02:00:15.520]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.