ROL_2012-02-27_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.000]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[00:05.000 --> 00:09.000]  Millions of dollars from the White House helped to pay for New York Police Department programs
[00:09.000 --> 00:12.000]  that put Muslim neighborhoods in the northeast under surveillance.
[00:12.000 --> 00:17.000]  The money was part of a little-known grant intended to help law enforcement fight drug crimes.
[00:17.000 --> 00:23.000]  The Bush and Obama administrations have provided $135 million to New York and New Jersey
[00:23.000 --> 00:26.000]  through the program since 9-11.
[00:26.000 --> 00:35.000]  Global demand for drones is heating up with annual global spending forecast to double to $11.3 billion over the next decade.
[00:35.000 --> 00:41.000]  The U.S. military now has over 7,500 remotely controlled aircraft deployed across the globe.
[00:41.000 --> 00:47.000]  The Asia Pacific is the second largest buyer after America's 19,000 law enforcement agencies.
[00:47.000 --> 00:52.000]  30,000 drones could be flying in U.S. airspace by 2020.
[00:52.000 --> 00:59.000]  The revolutionary armed forces of Columbia pledged Sunday to release remaining police and military hostages
[00:59.000 --> 01:03.000]  and historic shift for Latin America's longest-fighting leftist guerrillas.
[01:03.000 --> 01:09.000]  The group also said it planned to outlaw civilian kidnapping, which for decades it has used to raise money,
[01:09.000 --> 01:14.000]  saying the tactic was no longer compatible, quote, with our revolutionary activity.
[01:14.000 --> 01:22.000]  An email written by George Friedman, CEO of Global Intelligence Company's Stratfor and published by WikiLeaks Monday,
[01:22.000 --> 01:29.000]  shows Friedman realized the company's use of bribes to get information from insiders makes them legally vulnerable.
[01:29.000 --> 01:36.000]  Friedman warned employees, we are retaining a law firm to create a policy for Stratfor on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,
[01:36.000 --> 01:39.000]  adding, I don't plan to do the perp walk.
[01:39.000 --> 01:46.000]  The email was one of five million hacked and passed on to WikiLeaks, showing the inner workings of a private intelligence agency.
[01:46.000 --> 01:52.000]  Stratfor monitored the online activities of Bhopal activists for chemical giant Dow Chemical.
[01:52.000 --> 01:58.000]  The activists are seeking redress for the 1984 Union Carbide Gas Disaster in Bhopal, India,
[01:58.000 --> 02:04.000]  which led to thousands of deaths, injuries to more than half a million people, and lasting environmental damage.
[02:04.000 --> 02:12.000]  A suicide car bomber killed nine people Monday in an attack on a military airport in eastern Afghanistan.
[02:12.000 --> 02:17.000]  The latest bloodshed since copies of the Koran were burned at a NATO base last week.
[02:17.000 --> 02:23.000]  Anti-Western fury has deepened since the desecration of the Muslim holy book at Bargram Air Base.
[02:23.000 --> 02:27.000]  The U.S. Embassy warned of a heightened threat to American citizens in Afghanistan,
[02:27.000 --> 02:30.000]  and many Westerners were not allowed out of their fortified compounds.
[02:30.000 --> 02:35.000]  The groundswell of anger over the burning of the Koran has highlighted the challenges ahead,
[02:35.000 --> 02:41.000]  as Western forces try to quell violence and bring about reconciliation with the Taliban.
[02:41.000 --> 02:46.000]  The violence has killed more than 30 people and wounded at least 200, including two U.S. troops,
[02:46.000 --> 02:50.000]  shot dead by an Afghan soldier, and two senior U.S. officers,
[02:50.000 --> 02:56.000]  shot inside the Interior Ministry, prompting NATO to withdraw their staff from Afghan ministries.
[02:56.000 --> 03:02.000]  More details on this story, visit INNworld.net
[03:02.000 --> 03:23.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[03:32.000 --> 03:52.000]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton.
[03:52.000 --> 03:58.000]  It is February 27th, 2012. We are live, not Memorex tonight.
[03:58.000 --> 04:04.000]  The first thing I want to get into is dealing with the motion for new trial on my case.
[04:04.000 --> 04:11.000]  So far, I have heard nothing back from the municipal court regarding my motion for new trial.
[04:11.000 --> 04:22.000]  According to Chapter 30 of the government code, specifically 30.00014 subsection C,
[04:22.000 --> 04:28.000]  they have up to 30 days to respond to the motion.
[04:28.000 --> 04:34.000]  And at the end of the 30 days, the motion is considered overruled by operation of law.
[04:34.000 --> 04:42.000]  Now, I have a feeling they're just going to sit on it and let it overrule itself.
[04:42.000 --> 04:54.000]  And the reason I say this is because the same judge that presided at my trial and who presumably is the same judge that should be reading my motion for new trial
[04:54.000 --> 05:16.000]  is the same judge that is still doing the same illegal acts, citing the same illegal methods and behaving in the same illegal manner in other cases that are still ongoing down at that court, which tells me one of two things.
[05:16.000 --> 05:35.000]  Either the judge has not read anything in the motion we filed that points out the obviousness of his errors and his judicial ineptness in his ability to exercise the powers of a judge in these cases.
[05:35.000 --> 05:54.000]  But for him to continue to misquote the same law, misrepresent the same set of facts to everyone that comes before him, leads me to believe that this judge is incapable of learning.
[05:54.000 --> 06:06.000]  This judge is incapable of independent critical analysis of facts and legal issues. This judge is an idiot, okay?
[06:06.000 --> 06:15.000]  How the man managed to get on the bench is beyond me, with the possible exception of playing maybe the race card.
[06:15.000 --> 06:28.000]  And at the risk of sounding racist, I'm going to put this up front for what it is. The majority of the judges down at the Austin Municipal Court are minority judges.
[06:28.000 --> 06:38.000]  They're Hispanics, they're blacks, and there's only one or two actual white judges out of the over a dozen that are down there.
[06:38.000 --> 06:58.000]  The head administrative judge is black, Evelyn McKee. But regardless of all of that, none of these people seem to be able to get together and come to a common understanding of what due process even means.
[06:58.000 --> 07:08.000]  They honestly believe they have the power to pick and choose what law binds them and what law doesn't.
[07:08.000 --> 07:20.000]  And they have the unmitigated gall to tell you to your face that they don't have to do it the way the book says they have to do it.
[07:20.000 --> 07:37.000]  This same judge literally told a defendant in his court that we don't have to give you notice at all anytime because if the requirement is that we give you notice one day prior to trial,
[07:37.000 --> 07:44.000]  then when you tell us you haven't gotten it, we're just going to reschedule your trial.
[07:44.000 --> 07:55.000]  Sorry, doofus, it doesn't work that way because there are two separate criteria at work here for the requirements of notice.
[07:55.000 --> 08:15.000]  One is the requirement under 1.05, which is the codified statute of Article 1, Section 10 of the Texas Constitution's Bill of Rights, which says that a defendant has a right to a written copy of the nature in charge against them.
[08:15.000 --> 08:30.000]  You have 1.14b, which says that the defendant has a right to a copy of any indictment or information filed against them for the purpose of determining whether it is invalid in form or content,
[08:30.000 --> 08:39.000]  and that they have to determine that and object to it no later than one day prior to trial on the merits.
[08:39.000 --> 08:47.000]  Then you have 45.019f, which says exactly the same thing regarding a complaint.
[08:47.000 --> 08:58.000]  The defendant is entitled to have a copy of the complaint no later than one day prior to trial on the merits so that they can object to its form or content,
[08:58.000 --> 09:05.000]  and they have to do it no later than one day prior to trial on the merits.
[09:05.000 --> 09:13.000]  Then you have the separate distinct issue under 45.018b.
[09:13.000 --> 09:39.000]  45.018b states that the defendant is entitled to a copy of any complaint no later than one day prior to any proceeding in the prosecution of that complaint or in the prosecution under that complaint.
[09:39.000 --> 09:43.000]  It's what it actually says.
[09:43.000 --> 09:53.000]  So not only do you have the defendant's ability to object to form and content no later than one day prior to trial on the merits,
[09:53.000 --> 10:01.000]  but you've got to serve them no later than one day prior to any proceeding.
[10:01.000 --> 10:16.000]  That would mean any trial before or any hearing before trial on the merits so that they have time to determine whether or not there are form or content problems with the complaint
[10:16.000 --> 10:21.000]  or the charging instrument in the form of an indictment or information.
[10:21.000 --> 10:31.000]  So you would have to serve me before any proceeding in order to make the service timely,
[10:31.000 --> 10:46.000]  and then I have up until one day prior to trial on the merits to study and determine whether or not there is objectionable content or form to that instrument.
[10:46.000 --> 10:51.000]  This idiot, they can just change it whenever he wants.
[10:51.000 --> 10:56.000]  We don't have to serve you notice. We don't have to give you notice.
[10:56.000 --> 10:58.000]  Really?
[10:58.000 --> 11:05.000]  Well, buddy boy, when you meet me in federal court, tell that to the federal judge.
[11:05.000 --> 11:20.000]  I want to see the look on his face when he hears you say it, and then I want to see the look on your face when he asked you how in the hell did you ever get a bar card?
[11:20.000 --> 11:33.000]  When you do not know even the most basic tenements of the right of due process, how did you get a bar card much less a judgeship?
[11:33.000 --> 11:47.000]  It is ludicrous that someone with your judicial ineptitude should be sitting in judgment of anything more important than a freaking bake off at the county fair.
[11:47.000 --> 11:58.000]  Because when it comes to anything in a court of law, you are seriously lacking in your judicial know-how and understanding.
[11:58.000 --> 12:05.000]  I want to see your face, Jenkins, when that message is brought home to you.
[12:05.000 --> 12:21.000]  I want to see the face on your head administrative judge Evelyn McKee when that federal judge looks at her and goes, what the hell are you thinking putting this idiot in charge of a case?
[12:21.000 --> 12:25.000]  Are all of your judges like this?
[12:25.000 --> 12:37.000]  If they are, then I expect to see each and every one of you in here on a repeated basis, and I intend to hand down exactly the same ruling against you.
[12:37.000 --> 12:42.000]  Idiot, idiot, idiot.
[12:42.000 --> 12:46.000]  Folks, we need to make this happen.
[12:46.000 --> 12:49.000]  This has to happen.
[12:49.000 --> 12:54.000]  We are counting on you to help us make it happen.
[12:54.000 --> 13:03.000]  I am not financially viable in the ability to take this case from beginning to end in the federal courts.
[13:03.000 --> 13:07.000]  I'm not even able to do it from beginning to end in the local courts.
[13:07.000 --> 13:17.000]  That's the problem with spending all of my time putting together the material that we give to you, that we teach in the classes, that we write into the seminar.
[13:17.000 --> 13:21.000]  It makes work in a regular job virtually impossible.
[13:21.000 --> 13:24.000]  My phone rings 24-7.
[13:24.000 --> 13:34.000]  My girlfriend wants to disown me and throw my phone out to sea because no matter what we're doing, the phone will ring.
[13:34.000 --> 13:37.000]  It's irritating, it's aggravating.
[13:37.000 --> 13:38.000]  Why?
[13:38.000 --> 13:49.000]  Not because I'm mind-helping anybody, but simply because everybody wants my help, but nobody wants to pay me for it.
[13:49.000 --> 13:56.000]  Nobody wants to help support this network to the degree that we need it supported.
[13:56.000 --> 14:17.000]  There is so much that we could bring to you if we had the finances available to make our network bigger, better, and able to dedicate ourselves in a way where we can actually earn enough money doing this work to pay for our bills and our food
[14:17.000 --> 14:28.000]  and all the other accoutments of at least living a somewhat even at poverty line level lifestyle.
[14:28.000 --> 14:46.000]  But right now, you're the only lifeline we've got in that regard because everything that the people on this network have, especially on this show, is tied up in what we do to inform you.
[14:46.000 --> 14:59.000]  I have taken it personally upon my shoulders to fight the battle that most of you want to fight but don't know how.
[14:59.000 --> 15:01.000]  I have taken this case to court.
[15:01.000 --> 15:08.000]  I intentionally traveled back and forth at a rate of speed to get a ticket, and they finally obliged me.
[15:08.000 --> 15:15.000]  Let's not make this a disappointment for anybody.
[15:15.000 --> 15:22.000]  I want to be able to take this case all the way, but I need you folks to help me do that.
[15:22.000 --> 15:41.000]  I need you to please donate to me, the network, the legal assistance fund to get this case in the courts and keep it there so that we don't lose simply because we don't have two dimes to rub together to pay the next fee.
[15:41.000 --> 15:59.000]  Please, folks, I'm begging you, whatever you can pump into this network to keep us working for you is not only appreciated, it gets returned to you tenfold in the information that it helps us bring about.
[15:59.000 --> 16:13.000]  People are constantly sending us emails, calling into the show, saying, thank you so much, you've helped me so much, and all this, great, I'm glad we can help you, but we need you too.
[16:13.000 --> 16:23.000]  Not just to listen, not just to learn, but to help us stay alive and financially viable.
[16:23.000 --> 16:30.000]  Okay, I know this sounds like the Jerry Lewis telephone, but heaven knows we need the money, okay?
[16:30.000 --> 16:41.000]  These fights don't come cheap, and these fights are being waged and warred on your behalf, so please support us in that.
[16:41.000 --> 16:53.000]  Hi, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number is 512-646-1984. We will start taking your calls on the other side if we get anybody calling in.
[16:53.000 --> 17:00.000]  This is Eddie Craig, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens. We'll be right back after the break.
[17:00.000 --> 17:12.000]  America is in trouble. Washington is a disgrace. Government has become too big. It's overtaxing, overstanding. We need to change direction. We really need to change. You can't afford to make the same mistakes we've made in the past.
[17:12.000 --> 17:22.000]  Mitt Romney's reputation is a flip-flopper. He went the other way when he got paid to go the other way. There is need for economic stimulus. It's about serial hypocrisy.
[17:22.000 --> 17:32.000]  This election is about trust. There's been one true consistent candidate, and that's Dr. Ron Paul. Ron Paul has been so consistent from the very beginning. He seemed like a more honest candidate.
[17:32.000 --> 17:40.000]  He tells the truth about what he believes, whether you like it or not. He's never once voted for a tax increase, never once voted for an unbalanced budget.
[17:40.000 --> 17:48.000]  Ron Paul's plan is bold, cut five departments. It's what we need. When he says he's going to cut a trillion dollars in the first year, I believe it.
[17:48.000 --> 17:53.000]  I don't like how things are going. He's tired of politicians. He's something different.
[17:53.000 --> 18:00.000]  Ron Paul. Ron Paul. Ron Paul. Ron Paul. He's the one we've been looking for. I'm Ron Paul, and I approve this message.
[18:00.000 --> 18:09.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meyers Proven Method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:21.000]  Michael Meyers has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:29.000]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports?
[18:29.000 --> 18:39.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Meyers Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:50.000]  Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meyers banner or email MichaelMeyers at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 19:00.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[19:20.000 --> 19:49.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig.
[19:49.000 --> 20:01.000]  Okay, right now we have Ron in Arizona up on the board, so we're going to start taking the calls. But again, folks, call in number is 512-646-1984.
[20:01.000 --> 20:07.000]  If you've got a question for your issue, now's the time to get in line. Ian and Ron, what can we do for you?
[20:07.000 --> 20:28.000]  Yeah, I just got a few questions about due process. The first thing is, here in Arizona they have, let me see, there was like a court case and they give the summons just by normal mail and they sent the summons to previous address.
[20:28.000 --> 20:45.000]  And then they issued a warrant and the warrant was signed by a county attorney. So my first question is, isn't that unlawful because the Fourth Amendment says a warrant needs to be supported by oath or affirmation and an affidavit, in which case they didn't have?
[20:45.000 --> 21:03.000]  As far as I know, only a magistrate can issue a warrant unless your state legislature specifically authorized county attorneys to do it. The issuing of a warrant is a magisterial power and that's not normally within the purview of a county attorney.
[21:03.000 --> 21:12.000]  Now the county attorney can be the one that signs the affidavit in support, but they can't normally be the one that signs the warrant.
[21:12.000 --> 21:19.000]  Right, but this is like a state thing and couldn't I argue that that's not constitutional?
[21:19.000 --> 21:34.000]  No, not unless there's something in your state constitution that forbids it. You need to read the statutes. What did the statutes authorize him to do? Who has the power to issue warrants in Arizona?
[21:34.000 --> 21:57.000]  Okay, and then the second question I have is in the pursuing of the warrant, are people like, is a bonding company along with out of town police officers allowed to enter the home to execute the warrant?
[21:57.000 --> 22:05.000]  If the warrant is, yes, they can enter a home to execute a warrant if they believe the person the warrant's for is there.
[22:05.000 --> 22:31.000]  They cannot enter a home to perform an arrest without a warrant unless they can visually identify a felony act or some other level felony, I guess you have to say contraband that would allow them to enter the home with the presumption a felony is in progress.
[22:31.000 --> 22:37.000]  Right, otherwise they can't enter without the warrant.
[22:37.000 --> 22:51.000]  Okay, and another question I have is let's say there's like a case and it's a criminal case and the witnesses you feel are lying.
[22:51.000 --> 23:01.000]  Is it possible to sue the witnesses in a federal case and use maybe like depositions and stuff like that and then present it in the criminal case?
[23:01.000 --> 23:09.000]  You can't sue the witness unless you can prove that the witness was, that's kind of a loaded question.
[23:09.000 --> 23:23.000]  Normally you're not going to be able to sue a witness if the witness believes what they're testifying to. If they are committing aggravated perjury, that's a criminal act and not necessarily a civil tort.
[23:23.000 --> 23:24.000]  Okay.
[23:24.000 --> 23:43.000]  Now that's not saying that you don't have a tort, it depends on what your state allows as far as suing of those particular things. But if you can show for certain that the witness is lying at the behest of the prosecuting attorney or some other member of the court or prosecutorial team.
[23:43.000 --> 23:49.000]  Oh yeah, you got a major tort not just against the witness but against the court and the prosecution as well.
[23:49.000 --> 24:05.000]  Okay. And let me see. Oh, also another thing is if you have a case in state court, I just found out today that you can remove it to the federal court.
[24:05.000 --> 24:20.000]  Only if you can show that there is a violation of a federally protected right at issue and the state will not, cannot or does not do anything to ensure its protection and enforcement.
[24:20.000 --> 24:23.000]  Okay.
[24:23.000 --> 24:28.000]  All right. So I think that was it for the questions that I had for today.
[24:28.000 --> 24:30.000]  Okay. Thanks for calling in, Ron.
[24:30.000 --> 24:33.000]  Okay. Bye.
[24:33.000 --> 24:38.000]  Okay. Now we're going to John in Texas. John, what can we do for you?
[24:38.000 --> 24:44.000]  First of all, I got to shut off this speakerphone. I was in the car, but I'm just pulling out.
[24:44.000 --> 24:52.000]  Yeah, if you keep talking on that speakerphone, Deborah's going to be on you like white on rice.
[24:52.000 --> 24:57.000]  Well, I'm trying to shut up. All right, hold on. I'm new to this.
[24:57.000 --> 24:59.000]  Trying to make it.
[24:59.000 --> 25:07.000]  Well, what I'm up to is, you know, I am so pleased to know you guys exist.
[25:07.000 --> 25:12.000]  I've been to your class. I really got a lot out of it, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[25:12.000 --> 25:23.000]  But what I want to bring up is that we are talking about taking the laws that are not good laws and not even there.
[25:23.000 --> 25:30.000]  They're illegal laws and doing away with them. What I'm wondering about is why don't we get proactive
[25:30.000 --> 25:36.000]  and figure out what laws we're going to replace there so that we won't have chaos?
[25:36.000 --> 25:42.000]  What do you mean by replace? Why would they need to be replaced if they're bad in the first instance?
[25:42.000 --> 25:52.000]  Well, they're bad for the wrong reasons because they were never, for example, were not in transportation or were not in commerce.
[25:52.000 --> 26:01.000]  There's nothing wrong with those laws. What's wrong with anything is the public servant's understanding of what those laws apply to.
[26:01.000 --> 26:10.000]  The law itself, in most instances, is not the problem. It's the incompetence of the individual enforcing it.
[26:10.000 --> 26:18.000]  That is the problem. Lack of training, lack of understanding, lack of any ability to comprehend English.
[26:18.000 --> 26:25.000]  I see. I see. But I'm saying after that's gone, what is going to enforce the speed limit?
[26:25.000 --> 26:31.000]  What will we put in place? How should we do that? We'll need speed limits.
[26:31.000 --> 26:36.000]  The speed limit? You need speed limits for what?
[26:36.000 --> 26:45.000]  Well, it's this heavy traffic area with children. You might want to say 50 miles an hour is a little bit too much.
[26:45.000 --> 26:59.000]  Well, you might, but the problem is, again, where do I come into the power and authority to regulate you?
[26:59.000 --> 27:10.000]  Well, I'm saying to you, I agree with that, and it's not there, but let's make some authority somewhere so that we don't have people hurting each other by...
[27:10.000 --> 27:17.000]  Well, that's where people are supposed to be self-responsible.
[27:17.000 --> 27:25.000]  Well, but that's where people, that is where self-responsibility comes in, okay?
[27:25.000 --> 27:34.000]  You are responsible for what you do. You are the one responsible for the consequences of your own actions.
[27:34.000 --> 27:51.000]  I shouldn't have to create a rule that tells you don't do this when you should have the mental capacity to know from what you see and hear that what you're doing is inherently dangerous to others.
[27:51.000 --> 28:00.000]  You're asking me to make a rule to regulate you rather than you being self-regulating.
[28:00.000 --> 28:12.000]  The problem is, is no human being has the power to regulate another in a private capacity. We don't.
[28:12.000 --> 28:27.000]  We can't create that power unless we are willing to use force to make someone subservient to our rules, which is the problem we have right now.
[28:27.000 --> 28:35.000]  The entire system that was set up was based upon three things.
[28:35.000 --> 28:54.000]  The moral responsibility of the individual, the ability of the individual to determine whether or not their actions were harmful to others or their property, and self-restraint under the previous two.
[28:54.000 --> 29:08.000]  When an individual is incapable of doing those things, those are the ones that eventually, either negligently or intentionally, cause harm.
[29:08.000 --> 29:26.000]  When those people cause harm, then the rest of us have the right to come together and say, because of your actions and the harm you've committed, punishment must follow.
[29:26.000 --> 29:46.000]  And that's exactly why government was created, to ensure that those that did those things that caused those harms could be held accountable, so that we didn't have to keep coming together in individual policies and doing it ourselves.
[29:46.000 --> 30:00.000]  Hang on and we'll pick this up on the other side. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number is 512-646-1984. We'll be right back on the other side of this break.
[30:00.000 --> 30:13.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:13.000 --> 30:17.000]  6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:17.000 --> 30:20.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:20.000 --> 30:21.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:21.000 --> 30:22.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[30:22.000 --> 30:23.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:23.000 --> 30:25.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:25.000 --> 30:27.000]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[30:27.000 --> 30:46.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:57.000 --> 31:02.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[31:02.000 --> 31:15.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[31:15.000 --> 31:20.000]  Anticipation. It's making me wait.
[31:20.000 --> 31:30.000]  Good things come to those who wait, but when it comes to FOIA requests, enough is enough. A dozen U.S. federal agencies have Freedom of Information Act log jams that go back six years.
[31:30.000 --> 31:39.000]  Congress has responded with the Faster FOIA Act. It would create a committee to evaluate FOIA backlogs and propose recommendations to speed up processing.
[31:39.000 --> 31:50.000]  I say it's about time. I submitted a FOIA request to the FDA back in 2004 seeking studies the agency used to evaluate the safety of implantable human microchips.
[31:50.000 --> 31:53.000]  It took them a full year to tell me they had no such studies.
[31:53.000 --> 32:01.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:01.000 --> 32:14.000]  Yeah, I got that one right. I'm not going to solve that. To the head of a man that prosecute them.
[32:14.000 --> 32:18.000]  Okay.
[32:18.000 --> 32:21.000]  What's up?
[32:21.000 --> 32:32.000]  All right. We are back. This is rule of law radio. The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[32:32.000 --> 32:35.000]  This is your host Eddie Craig with the Monday Night Traffic Show.
[32:35.000 --> 32:39.000]  Samuel, I do see you there on the board. Hang on just a minute and I will pick you back up.
[32:39.000 --> 32:43.000]  I'm going to finish up with what I was talking about before we went to break.
[32:43.000 --> 32:54.000]  But the basic understanding of what individual rights and individual sovereignty means is that I am responsible for me.
[32:54.000 --> 33:08.000]  And no one has a cause of action against me unless that someone can show where I have caused them or their property a palpable harm.
[33:08.000 --> 33:16.000]  Meaning something tangible. You can see, touch, feel, or measure. Okay?
[33:16.000 --> 33:19.000]  That's when you have a claim against me.
[33:19.000 --> 33:27.000]  Now to talk about creating new laws that want to regulate me, well that's what they're trying to do now.
[33:27.000 --> 33:34.000]  The problem is they don't have the authority to do it. I am self-regulating.
[33:34.000 --> 33:42.000]  I'm designed that way. I don't need you or anybody else to do it for me.
[33:42.000 --> 33:49.000]  I am not going to go out and intentionally cause a harm to anybody or anything.
[33:49.000 --> 33:57.000]  And if I do cause a harm, there's only two other ways it can be if it's not intentional.
[33:57.000 --> 34:06.000]  Accidental meaning there was absolutely no way I could have known or prevented the result or through negligence.
[34:06.000 --> 34:14.000]  Meaning that I was not doing something I could have or should have done to avoid the result.
[34:14.000 --> 34:19.000]  That is what being personally liable and responsible is all about.
[34:19.000 --> 34:27.000]  We don't need government or our neighbors telling us what we can or cannot do.
[34:27.000 --> 34:36.000]  We are supposed to be intelligent and independent to the point that we can determine whether or not we're causing a harm.
[34:36.000 --> 34:47.000]  We should be socially capable that we can recognize that and we can mitigate the harm by going to the potential victim
[34:47.000 --> 34:55.000]  and saying, oops, I'm sorry, I was painting my house yesterday and I suddenly realized that you were downwind from me
[34:55.000 --> 35:01.000]  and so the fumes could have bothered you, the paint could have blown on your car.
[35:01.000 --> 35:08.000]  If any of that happened, I sincerely apologize and let me fix whatever needs fixing.
[35:08.000 --> 35:19.000]  Instead, the reason we've got the crap in place we do now is because everybody wants to hide from their personal liability and responsibility.
[35:19.000 --> 35:22.000]  Welcome to the freaking welfare state.
[35:22.000 --> 35:32.000]  Somebody else take care of the problem and let me do what I want to do and if I screw up and hurt somebody, oh well, I'm not to blame.
[35:32.000 --> 35:46.000]  Something else is my upbringing, my environment, my desire to not think for myself anything but my own personal desire to do right or wrong.
[35:46.000 --> 35:50.000]  Well, I don't want anybody regulating me.
[35:50.000 --> 35:53.000]  Never have, never will.
[35:53.000 --> 35:55.000]  I can do it myself.
[35:55.000 --> 36:04.000]  Hopefully the people listening to this show understand the concept and will take it to heart and want to do it for themselves.
[36:04.000 --> 36:13.000]  When we tell government to butt out, we can handle it, then a lot of these codes and statutes will be worthless.
[36:13.000 --> 36:15.000]  We don't need them.
[36:15.000 --> 36:26.000]  But that requires us to first step up and be willing to be responsible for ourselves.
[36:26.000 --> 36:30.000]  So I hope that answers your question.
[36:30.000 --> 36:34.000]  Is this the same John that's up on the board now that we dropped off?
[36:34.000 --> 36:35.000]  Yes.
[36:35.000 --> 36:40.000]  John, does that give you any understanding at all as to what I'm talking about?
[36:40.000 --> 36:46.000]  Yeah, I'll clear it up. What I should be asking you is, it looks like there is.
[36:46.000 --> 37:03.000]  There's two kinds of times that we would want to get together and do something as a group because of some harm that an individual is doing, intentionally or accidentally, but often enough that we have to do something.
[37:03.000 --> 37:13.000]  And what it would not be the time to do that is things about income tax and all kinds of all the other regulations that they are turning us into robots with.
[37:13.000 --> 37:17.000]  And I'm really with you in spirit and you have no idea how much.
[37:17.000 --> 37:32.000]  But I'll just say that there are some instances, for example, emergency accidents or where someone's going to get killed because we know ahead of time, right now in the position that we are in as a people.
[37:32.000 --> 37:38.000]  There are a lot of people who are going to be, again, the example of speeding down a block where there's going to be kids.
[37:38.000 --> 37:43.000]  And we want to wait until after they hit somebody and say, well, you haven't been responsible.
[37:43.000 --> 37:46.000]  We know they're going to be there at a certain percentage.
[37:46.000 --> 37:50.000]  That is actuarial.
[37:50.000 --> 37:52.000]  Now, I'm into education.
[37:52.000 --> 37:57.000]  I know, I feel like I have a really good answer how to change the education system and bring it back.
[37:57.000 --> 38:06.000]  So we had actually killing beings walking around instead of people taking orders from the code that's all over them and been there since seven years old.
[38:06.000 --> 38:17.000]  But at this point, the way people are, I think we'd have to have a way to say to them, no, we're not going to consider our mothers and fathers.
[38:17.000 --> 38:20.000]  We are not going to allow this to be an accident.
[38:20.000 --> 38:27.000]  And then we go and ask them to be due or the accident to be punished or not to do it again.
[38:27.000 --> 38:32.000]  No, you know, there's got to be a differentiation there between a dramatic accident and something like income tax.
[38:32.000 --> 38:37.000]  Okay, you're talking about something that has a potential to happen.
[38:37.000 --> 38:45.000]  Actuarial tables aside, you, I, no one can prevent what is meant to be.
[38:45.000 --> 38:52.000]  You, I, or no one can make the world perfectly safe for anyone.
[38:52.000 --> 38:54.000]  Do we agree on that?
[38:54.000 --> 38:55.000]  No, not at all.
[38:55.000 --> 38:58.000]  No, you can't put actually our tables aside.
[38:58.000 --> 39:03.000]  And besides going to that, there, you can prevent, you can prevent what.
[39:03.000 --> 39:07.000]  So there is nothing, no such thing as something that's meant to be.
[39:07.000 --> 39:09.000]  I don't, I don't recognize that.
[39:09.000 --> 39:14.000]  I don't know, you know, I know there are some religions that do, but that is not.
[39:14.000 --> 39:15.000]  It's not one of them.
[39:15.000 --> 39:20.000]  And most people feel like if, if, you know, if you know that there's going to be kids in there and they're going to be,
[39:20.000 --> 39:26.000]  say, shooting crack up and there's a certain percentage, you're going to climb that school down the block.
[39:26.000 --> 39:28.000]  We just take that whole building out.
[39:28.000 --> 39:29.000]  Okay.
[39:29.000 --> 39:30.000]  There's no more potential anymore.
[39:30.000 --> 39:36.000]  They're not, they're not, it's not going to be meant to be because there's nothing there for it to be meant into.
[39:36.000 --> 39:38.000]  What prevents them from going somewhere else?
[39:38.000 --> 39:41.000]  I was going to say, they'll just go somewhere else.
[39:41.000 --> 39:42.000]  Yeah.
[39:42.000 --> 39:45.000]  How can you say taking out that building prevents the act?
[39:45.000 --> 39:46.000]  It doesn't.
[39:46.000 --> 39:47.000]  No way.
[39:47.000 --> 39:48.000]  Re-locate.
[39:48.000 --> 39:50.000]  Yeah, but it prevents it in that particular building.
[39:50.000 --> 39:52.000]  Yeah, but when do you stop?
[39:52.000 --> 40:00.000]  When do you get to the point where you can say, okay, no matter where they go, we're going to wipe it out?
[40:00.000 --> 40:04.000]  Where do you get the power to wipe out every building they could use?
[40:04.000 --> 40:06.000]  And why should we anyway?
[40:06.000 --> 40:08.000]  Hey, that'd be one of the ones that I'm going with.
[40:08.000 --> 40:10.000]  I'm just saying, I was trying to come up with a different example.
[40:10.000 --> 40:12.000]  I didn't think that's enough.
[40:12.000 --> 40:13.000]  It's not a good example.
[40:13.000 --> 40:19.000]  I'm talking about examples that bring immediate death or destruction to a human body, physical human body,
[40:19.000 --> 40:25.000]  because the nature of the culture that we have made are allowed to become here.
[40:25.000 --> 40:27.000]  And I'm all for trying to change that.
[40:27.000 --> 40:29.000]  And that's what I do in a regular base.
[40:29.000 --> 40:35.000]  But you can't say that there's not going to be a whole bunch of people speeding in a given area, say,
[40:35.000 --> 40:37.000]  or a whole bunch of drunks coming out of a bar.
[40:37.000 --> 40:38.000]  No, you can't.
[40:38.000 --> 40:44.000]  But you can say that if someone goes speeding through an area and hurt somebody, they can be held accountable.
[40:44.000 --> 40:46.000]  Yeah, but I wanted to be held accountable.
[40:46.000 --> 40:48.000]  I don't want to hurt somebody.
[40:48.000 --> 40:53.000]  Well, that may be true, but you can't predict with certainty who will or who won't.
[40:53.000 --> 40:56.000]  And passing a bunch of laws isn't going to stop it either.
[40:56.000 --> 41:03.000]  And besides, John, I don't know if you realize this, but there have been multiple studies done in many states
[41:03.000 --> 41:08.000]  where they had no speed limits at all on their highways.
[41:08.000 --> 41:12.000]  And even in the city streets, this happened in Montana and in Wyoming.
[41:12.000 --> 41:16.000]  And there was a study done over a 12-year period of time.
[41:16.000 --> 41:22.000]  And they found that there were far less fatalities, far less traffic accidents,
[41:22.000 --> 41:28.000]  and far less injuries due to speeding in the places where there was no speed limit.
[41:28.000 --> 41:31.000]  So I'm sorry, regulation doesn't work.
[41:31.000 --> 41:35.000]  I just said this that you might be right because I'm an open-minded person.
[41:35.000 --> 41:41.000]  I always aware of the fact when I look at somebody in the eye that I'm also looking up to the left
[41:41.000 --> 41:45.000]  that there's a black square there, and that black square represents my own ignorant.
[41:45.000 --> 41:46.000]  So I say that to you.
[41:46.000 --> 41:51.000]  But right now, it still seems like the word naive comes into play with you two guys.
[41:51.000 --> 41:53.000]  Well, no, I don't mean naive.
[41:53.000 --> 41:55.000]  I'm just simply being realistic.
[41:55.000 --> 41:56.000]  I can't...
[41:56.000 --> 41:57.000]  I don't think so.
[41:57.000 --> 41:59.000]  Okay, I know so.
[41:59.000 --> 42:04.000]  It is certainty that this guy is going to cause this accident, okay?
[42:04.000 --> 42:07.000]  Or this person is going to kill this child or that child.
[42:07.000 --> 42:08.000]  I can't do it.
[42:08.000 --> 42:09.000]  You can't do it.
[42:09.000 --> 42:15.000]  Now, you have numbers that might say eventually somewhere it's going to happen.
[42:15.000 --> 42:18.000]  But your numbers are not going to identify the parties.
[42:18.000 --> 42:21.000]  Yeah, and I've got numbers that show when there's less regulation,
[42:21.000 --> 42:24.000]  there's also less damage and less loss of life.
[42:24.000 --> 42:28.000]  Now, let me put a consideration out there in front of you.
[42:28.000 --> 42:33.000]  People are not used to having to be accountable for what they do.
[42:33.000 --> 42:36.000]  John, are you listening?
[42:36.000 --> 42:40.000]  Yeah, I don't know if he can hear us, so I just had to mute him for a second.
[42:40.000 --> 42:44.000]  I'm trying to send the audio louder and louder to the phone bridge so he can hear us talking.
[42:44.000 --> 42:46.000]  Go ahead, Eddie.
[42:46.000 --> 42:51.000]  Okay, consider this option here, okay?
[42:51.000 --> 43:00.000]  If people are not held accountable for what they do, then they become more negligent in what they do
[43:00.000 --> 43:04.000]  because they've not held accountable, okay?
[43:04.000 --> 43:11.000]  This is exactly one of the problems with being able just to turn everything over to your insurance company.
[43:11.000 --> 43:14.000]  Oh, if I have an accident, it's no big deal.
[43:14.000 --> 43:16.000]  My insurance company will handle it.
[43:16.000 --> 43:21.000]  I don't have to be any more careful unless I just want to make sure my rates don't go up.
[43:21.000 --> 43:25.000]  To them, it's all about the financial aspect of being careful,
[43:25.000 --> 43:30.000]  not the loss of property or life that resulted from their actions.
[43:30.000 --> 43:34.000]  Now, let's consider what happens with those individuals.
[43:34.000 --> 43:38.000]  We're talking about citizens, a lot of the times, in their culture,
[43:38.000 --> 43:44.000]  and they are not interested in people's health.
[43:44.000 --> 43:49.000]  Well, that may be true, but again, you're wanting to do to me what you're doing to the businessmen
[43:49.000 --> 43:53.000]  whether I'm doing what they're doing or not.
[43:53.000 --> 43:56.000]  Hang on. We'll try to get this wrapped up again on the other side.
[43:56.000 --> 44:01.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio. We will be right back.
[44:01.000 --> 44:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.000 --> 44:14.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[44:14.000 --> 44:19.000]  step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.000 --> 44:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:39.000 --> 44:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:50.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:50.000 --> 45:01.000]  free tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:20.000 --> 45:27.000]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley,
[45:27.000 --> 45:33.000]  who lost her children in one of her legs in the bombing, testified that she saw McVeigh with another man,
[45:33.000 --> 45:36.000]  the fateful John Doe No. 2, exiting the rider truck.
[45:36.000 --> 45:41.000]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing,
[45:41.000 --> 45:48.000]  no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing.
[45:48.000 --> 45:50.000]  Including when he rented the rider truck.
[45:50.000 --> 45:54.000]  And in some cases, have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:54.000 --> 46:20.000]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:25.000 --> 46:28.000]  Hi, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:28.000 --> 46:33.000]  Samuel Hanging there. We do see you on the board. We're going to try to wrap this up with John.
[46:33.000 --> 46:36.000]  Alright, Deborah, you said there was something you had to make a comment on?
[46:36.000 --> 46:45.000]  Well, yeah. I mean, bad things are going to happen, and all the laws in the world that you can pass is not going to stop that.
[46:45.000 --> 46:49.000]  You can't control people's behavior. That's number one.
[46:49.000 --> 46:54.000]  You can't herd cats, and you can't control other people.
[46:54.000 --> 47:00.000]  It goes right along those lines, Deborah. You remember the movie, Bruce All-Moddy?
[47:00.000 --> 47:02.000]  I haven't seen that one.
[47:02.000 --> 47:04.000]  I haven't seen it. I haven't seen it.
[47:04.000 --> 47:09.000]  You've seen it? Okay. You remember when...
[47:09.000 --> 47:13.000]  Shoot. What's his face that played God?
[47:13.000 --> 47:16.000]  I don't know. I see media.
[47:16.000 --> 47:19.000]  Hey, John, are you on a speaker phone?
[47:19.000 --> 47:22.000]  I guess I am a little bit. I don't realize. Hold on.
[47:22.000 --> 47:27.000]  Yeah, can you please take it off of speaker phone? I think my call screener should have told you that, and I'm sure he did.
[47:27.000 --> 47:28.000]  Oh, he did.
[47:28.000 --> 47:35.000]  I took it off the other speaker, the radio speaker phone. I got cancer from handling these phones, so...
[47:35.000 --> 47:40.000]  Yeah, that's why I always advise people to use a wired headset.
[47:40.000 --> 47:46.000]  Not a Bluetooth, because that's got radiation, too, but to use a wired headset that way,
[47:46.000 --> 47:50.000]  you don't have to use the Bluetooth, and you can keep the phone far away from you.
[47:50.000 --> 47:51.000]  No, I know you're right.
[47:51.000 --> 47:54.000]  Okay, so go ahead, Eddie, about the movie.
[47:54.000 --> 48:00.000]  Okay, anyway, Morgan Freeman plays God, and Jim Carrey is playing Bruce.
[48:00.000 --> 48:01.000]  Yeah, Jim.
[48:01.000 --> 48:06.000]  You remember the section in there where he's the scene where he's telling him that I'm transferring you all of my powers?
[48:06.000 --> 48:15.000]  You can do anything you want, but the one thing you cannot touch is free will.
[48:15.000 --> 48:17.000]  Right, yeah.
[48:17.000 --> 48:32.000]  That's what every human being has that inherently negates the power and authority of any other human being to dictate what they can or cannot do free will.
[48:32.000 --> 48:37.000]  They have to choose to do right or wrong for themselves.
[48:37.000 --> 48:38.000]  I got your point.
[48:38.000 --> 48:49.000]  I mean, I 100% agree with that, but I still think that there's something here that I'm not clever enough to really bring out in a clean way for you guys to...
[48:49.000 --> 48:52.000]  Well, I mean, I understand the concept of where you're going.
[48:52.000 --> 48:53.000]  Don't think I don't.
[48:53.000 --> 48:54.000]  I do.
[48:54.000 --> 49:00.000]  But I have, like you, I have spent a lot of years looking at this from every angle.
[49:00.000 --> 49:19.000]  And the one thing that jumps out at me, no matter what angle you look at it from, if you give somebody the power in one place to regulate someone else, they begin to presume the power to regulate them in other ways as well.
[49:19.000 --> 49:22.000]  It happens without fail.
[49:22.000 --> 49:32.000]  If I can regulate you this way, then it naturally goes to course I can regulate you that way because they're related.
[49:32.000 --> 49:35.000]  And it builds and it builds.
[49:35.000 --> 49:37.000]  And the next thing you know, we're not free anymore.
[49:37.000 --> 49:38.000]  Yeah.
[49:38.000 --> 49:46.000]  And not only that, I have been studying the trends now and mainly this is happening in England.
[49:46.000 --> 49:51.000]  And if you want to know what's coming here, you look at what's happening in England.
[49:51.000 --> 50:03.000]  The big thing over there over the last few years has been what's called pre-crime and extensive data mining and data collection on human beings by the government.
[50:03.000 --> 50:14.000]  And they do this actuarial thing and they put together all these statistics to try to determine if someone is predisposed to some certain kind of a crime.
[50:14.000 --> 50:28.000]  They run all these formulas off of all this data that they gather on people which normally in this country you'd have to have a search warrant and some kind of probable cause to gather this type of information.
[50:28.000 --> 50:40.000]  And then they send social workers out to your house and take away your kids and make you go through classes because you might be predisposed to committing some sort of a crime.
[50:40.000 --> 50:46.000]  They're trying to keep the population in line and so I am totally against this notion and against this concept.
[50:46.000 --> 50:53.000]  This goes against everything that we stand for when it comes to being free human beings and a free society.
[50:53.000 --> 51:00.000]  I totally do not believe in this concept of pre-crime and all this data gathering and all this fusion centers.
[51:00.000 --> 51:07.000]  And let's see if somebody is predisposed and they might do this and they might do that and let's put them in jail anyway even though they haven't done anything yet.
[51:07.000 --> 51:11.000]  And let's pass every law that we can possibly think of to try to control people.
[51:11.000 --> 51:12.000]  No, I'm sorry.
[51:12.000 --> 51:24.000]  No, people are free no matter what we say or do and we just have to say, look, if somebody is going to commit a tort, if they actually cause damage to somebody else, then they're going to suffer the consequences.
[51:24.000 --> 51:25.000]  And that's it.
[51:25.000 --> 51:26.000]  That's all you can do.
[51:26.000 --> 51:29.000]  I mean, I think those people are total idiocy and ignorance.
[51:29.000 --> 51:33.000]  But the nature of ignorance is everybody in government generally have to feed into ignorance.
[51:33.000 --> 51:35.000]  John, we can't understand what you're saying.
[51:35.000 --> 51:36.000]  You sound real muffled.
[51:36.000 --> 51:37.000]  Oh, I'm sorry.
[51:37.000 --> 51:45.000]  I'm saying that in government, it's clear that anyone who is in government, their nature is partially ignorant.
[51:45.000 --> 51:46.000]  They have to be ignorant.
[51:46.000 --> 51:47.000]  That's why they're in government.
[51:47.000 --> 51:57.000]  We can't function in today's world without being some kind of deficient brain to try to do the kinds of things that you're suggesting.
[51:57.000 --> 52:01.000]  And Catherine Albright talks about quite a bit.
[52:01.000 --> 52:13.000]  I mean, you and I and Randy and everyone there, I'm sure that the majority of things, when it comes to rules and laws, I'm going to agree with 100%.
[52:13.000 --> 52:16.000]  But there's just some stuff that I'm not going to go any further.
[52:16.000 --> 52:18.000]  You guys got other people coming in.
[52:18.000 --> 52:33.000]  You know, I would like to get some information sometimes, and you'd have a way to look up that stuff about Montana and where they have the other kinds of points of view differing saying that there was less crime, et cetera.
[52:33.000 --> 52:34.000]  That would be interesting to me.
[52:34.000 --> 52:36.000]  I'll go look it up.
[52:36.000 --> 52:37.000]  Right.
[52:37.000 --> 52:39.000]  There's a show on this network, Free Mind Report.
[52:39.000 --> 52:41.000]  They had some guests on.
[52:41.000 --> 52:44.000]  This was about six months ago who had done all this extensive research.
[52:44.000 --> 52:47.000]  So I'm going to have to go back and find out what guests that was in the website.
[52:47.000 --> 52:52.000]  But when I was producing the show, I was like, yeah, that just proves it right there.
[52:52.000 --> 52:54.000]  Folks, freedom works.
[52:54.000 --> 52:55.000]  Okay.
[52:55.000 --> 53:01.000]  When there were no speed limit signs, there was, there was far, I mean, it was like an outrageous amount.
[53:01.000 --> 53:12.000]  It was like 80% less traffic accidents and fatalities because people would just travel and control their cars in a manner that they felt safe.
[53:12.000 --> 53:18.000]  And they didn't have to, and they weren't always worrying about the cops pulling them over or this or that.
[53:18.000 --> 53:33.000]  And so the results of the study showed that what caused the traffic accidents was people slamming on their brakes and just paying too much attention to trying to make sure that they weren't going over the speed limit.
[53:33.000 --> 53:43.000]  And they were actually getting in more accidents because they were so concerned about following the rules and worried about the police that they, it actually caused them to lose control of the cars.
[53:43.000 --> 53:52.000]  Whereas if they would just do what they normally would do and control the vehicle in the way that they felt safe, then everything was fine.
[53:52.000 --> 53:53.000]  Well, okay.
[53:53.000 --> 53:55.000]  You know what I'm going to do is I'll call you in.
[53:55.000 --> 53:57.000]  And so I don't want you to do that homework.
[53:57.000 --> 54:00.000]  I'll go ahead and call you in and find out what you can give me some more facts.
[54:00.000 --> 54:02.000]  I'll go ahead and get that information.
[54:02.000 --> 54:04.000]  And you just made a good point.
[54:04.000 --> 54:07.000]  I understand that because I do feel the pressure of the police.
[54:07.000 --> 54:17.000]  I grew up in Brooklyn and ever since as young as you can get, you're out in the street and you're always running for the police because it seems like everything you do as a kid is wrong.
[54:17.000 --> 54:18.000]  Yeah.
[54:18.000 --> 54:31.000]  I mean, they're always like checking their rear view mirrors and checking their side view mirrors and paying attention to their radar detectors and watching the speed limit signs and looking at the maps to try to figure out what the speed limit is in any particular given place where they are.
[54:31.000 --> 54:33.000]  Because they may not have seen the sign for...
[54:33.000 --> 54:41.000]  I mean, they were paying so much attention to try to follow the rules and worried about the police that they just ended up losing control of the cars.
[54:41.000 --> 54:43.000]  I mean, it's just stupidness.
[54:43.000 --> 54:45.000]  Well, I can see that.
[54:45.000 --> 54:47.000]  Anyway, I'll try to...
[54:47.000 --> 54:51.000]  I don't know where I would call you, but I know you don't need to take out any more homework.
[54:51.000 --> 54:52.000]  Okay.
[54:52.000 --> 55:00.000]  Well, all I have to do is ask the Freemind report guys and I'll try to make a post on the archive of tonight when I find out what it is.
[55:00.000 --> 55:02.000]  I'll send you the email so you got it.
[55:02.000 --> 55:03.000]  Yeah.
[55:03.000 --> 55:04.000]  You can send me an email.
[55:04.000 --> 55:09.000]  My email is posted on the website deborahatruleoflawradio.com.
[55:09.000 --> 55:10.000]  I've been on the website.
[55:10.000 --> 55:11.000]  I'll look it up.
[55:11.000 --> 55:12.000]  Okay.
[55:12.000 --> 55:13.000]  Great.
[55:13.000 --> 55:14.000]  Thank you, John.
[55:14.000 --> 55:15.000]  Good night, you guys.
[55:15.000 --> 55:16.000]  Okay.
[55:16.000 --> 55:17.000]  Good night.
[55:19.000 --> 55:20.000]  All right.
[55:20.000 --> 55:21.000]  We got another call on the line.
[55:21.000 --> 55:23.000]  We got Samuel in Texas.
[55:23.000 --> 55:26.000]  We got about three minutes before we go to our top of the hour break.
[55:26.000 --> 55:27.000]  Samuel, thanks for calling in.
[55:27.000 --> 55:29.000]  What is your question tonight?
[55:29.000 --> 55:34.000]  My question just specifically was a missed trial and traffic court.
[55:34.000 --> 55:41.000]  My little brother went to traffic court in River Oak, Texas and he did really bad at it.
[55:41.000 --> 55:45.000]  I try to get him to do everything that Eddie tells us to do.
[55:45.000 --> 55:47.000]  However, the prosecutor called me in.
[55:47.000 --> 55:49.000]  Anyway, I'll explain that later.
[55:49.000 --> 55:50.000]  But anyways, we got a missed trial.
[55:50.000 --> 55:57.000]  I filed a motion for a new trial outlining everything that had been wrong and about 15 days afterwards,
[55:57.000 --> 56:04.000]  we received a letter saying that they got a missed trial so they weren't able to produce a record for the appeal.
[56:04.000 --> 56:13.000]  My question is specifically does that involve double jeopardy or not?
[56:13.000 --> 56:14.000]  If they messed up on the record.
[56:14.000 --> 56:15.000]  No.
[56:15.000 --> 56:23.000]  It's only double jeopardy if an acquittal or conviction has been reached and they try the case again.
[56:23.000 --> 56:26.000]  Can you explain that, brother?
[56:26.000 --> 56:34.000]  Well, if you're found innocent of the charges but they try to turn around and charge you with them and hold another trial, that's double jeopardy.
[56:34.000 --> 56:35.000]  Okay.
[56:35.000 --> 56:45.000]  If you're found guilty, okay, and then they turn around and try to go through the same case again for the same charges for the same offense,
[56:45.000 --> 56:52.000]  they convict you again, then that's double jeopardy.
[56:52.000 --> 56:54.000]  You see what I'm saying?
[56:54.000 --> 56:58.000]  So if he goes back to court and they found him guilty again?
[56:58.000 --> 57:00.000]  They didn't find him guilty at all.
[57:00.000 --> 57:04.000]  A missed trial means they did not reach a verdict.
[57:04.000 --> 57:07.000]  Either way.
[57:07.000 --> 57:10.000]  All right.
[57:10.000 --> 57:16.000]  Okay, and I'll send another question that went on with it, kind of like a prosecutorial misconduct.
[57:16.000 --> 57:19.000]  Yeah, there's two ways to get a missed trial.
[57:19.000 --> 57:20.000]  Okay.
[57:20.000 --> 57:33.000]  If the court screws up and has to declare a missed trial, the jury can't come to a unanimous decision as to guilt or innocence and has to declare a missed trial.
[57:33.000 --> 57:36.000]  Or in this case, they declare a hung jury.
[57:36.000 --> 57:44.000]  But either thing results in the same thing, a missed trial.
[57:44.000 --> 57:46.000]  All right.
[57:46.000 --> 57:53.000]  And the second thing that went on was I've been doing this for about six months now and I've been pretty successful at it.
[57:53.000 --> 57:56.000]  My brother, he doesn't study too much and that's probably why he lost.
[57:56.000 --> 58:04.000]  But I don't know what happened that child was because a prosecutor called me in as a potential witness and they sent me outside the courtroom.
[58:04.000 --> 58:08.000]  Called you in as a potential witness against your brother?
[58:08.000 --> 58:10.000]  Yes.
[58:10.000 --> 58:12.000]  Okay.
[58:12.000 --> 58:14.000]  And they didn't even call me back in.
[58:14.000 --> 58:16.000]  I had nothing to go on.
[58:16.000 --> 58:18.000]  Yeah, they didn't want you in there to help me.
[58:18.000 --> 58:20.000]  Yeah.
[58:20.000 --> 58:22.000]  Well, I guess I'll pick up on that.
[58:22.000 --> 58:24.000]  Okay.
[58:24.000 --> 58:28.000]  Hang on, we will get it on the other side of the break here, Samuel.
[58:28.000 --> 58:33.000]  You guys put it in the form of a question though because I don't know what it is you're wanting me to answer on that.
[58:33.000 --> 58:35.000]  That's what they did once the question.
[58:35.000 --> 58:37.000]  Think about that while we're on break.
[58:37.000 --> 58:44.000]  Bye, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[58:44.000 --> 58:48.000]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Traffic Show with Eddie Craig.
[58:48.000 --> 58:51.000]  We have about an hour left, so now's the time to get in line.
[58:51.000 --> 58:54.000]  Don't wait till the last minute and make me leave you hanging.
[58:54.000 --> 58:57.000]  We'll be right back after the break.
[59:00.000 --> 59:04.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[59:04.000 --> 59:11.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:11.000 --> 59:16.000]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:16.000 --> 59:23.000]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:23.000 --> 59:28.000]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:28.000 --> 59:38.000]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[59:38.000 --> 59:51.000]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:16.000]  The New York Times reported Saturday a widespread consensus among analysts working for all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies believes Iran abandoned its nuclear weapons program in 2003.
[01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:24.000]  The article strikes a note of sanity amid widespread speculation Israel plans to bomb Iranian nuclear sites.
[01:00:24.000 --> 01:00:32.000]  Yemen appointed Abdu-Rabu Mansour Hadi, President, Saturday after three decades of rule by Ali Abdullah Saleh.
[01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:43.000]  Hadi was elected in Nepal in which he was the sole candidate, part of a deal broken by the Gulf Cooperation Council amid mass protests calling for Saleh's al-star.
[01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  Saleh will leave the country for Ethiopia this week, leaving his chosen successor.
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:59.000]  Up to 30,000 Russians linked hands around Moscow Sunday protesting Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's expected return to the Kremlin for a third term in elections next weekend.
[01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:09.000]  Elections last December were tainted by widespread fraud filmed by citizen journalists sparking the first mass protests against Putin's 12-year rule.
[01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:16.000]  WikiLeaks announced Sunday it's publishing over 5 million emails from the U.S.-based global intelligence company Stratfor.
[01:01:16.000 --> 01:01:24.000]  WikiLeaks has partnered with 25 media organizations including McClatchy Newspapers and Rolling Stone to publish the documents.
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:37.000]  WikiLeaks said the emails dated between July 2004 and December 2011 reveal the inner workings of a company that France has an intelligence publisher but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations
[01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:46.000]  such as Dow, Chemical, Lockheed, Martin and Raytheon, plus the Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Marines and the Defense Intelligence Agency.
[01:01:46.000 --> 01:01:55.000]  WikiLeaks added the emails expose Stratfor's web of informers, payoff structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.
[01:01:55.000 --> 01:02:03.000]  Anti-sec, part of the hacker group Anonymous, which claimed in December to have hacked into Stratfor, is believed to be the source of the emails.
[01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:17.000]  The trial to decide how much and who should pay for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill has been delayed a week to allow BP to cut a deal with tens of thousands of businesses and individuals affected by the disaster.
[01:02:17.000 --> 01:02:28.000]  Less than 24 hours before the case was due to start, U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier pushed back the date to allow further talks between BP and the plaintiff's steering committee,
[01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  which represents homeowners, fishermen and small business owners whose livelihoods were damaged by the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig in April 2010 and subsequent oil spill.
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  Eleven people were killed and 4.9 million barrels of oil spewed into the Gulf in the worst offshore spill in U.S. history.
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:03:05.000]  Bloomberg News said Monday BP and the plaintiffs were nearing completion of a $14 billion settlement.
[01:03:18.000 --> 01:03:25.000]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty.
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:32.000]  I read his book and it says he cares for the unsightly.
[01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:38.000]  These warmongers come by that term right there.
[01:03:38.000 --> 01:03:48.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Okay, we are going to go to Samuel in Texas and finish up his call.
[01:03:48.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  Alright Samuel, what exactly was the question on that last part that you had?
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:04:00.000]  The question was mainly, is a prosecutor allowed to call anybody that's inside the courtroom at that time of trial as a potential witness,
[01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:07.000]  even though he knows full well that there's no fact witness inside the courtroom other than the defendant?
[01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:11.000]  He can try to pull that unless somebody objects to it.
[01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:16.000]  Your brother could have objected, you could have objected saying, I have no knowledge of anything.
[01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:20.000]  I wasn't party to this in any way, shape or form, judge.
[01:04:20.000 --> 01:04:25.000]  There's nothing he could call me to be a witness for.
[01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:32.000]  That's what I told him and he said he believes that I have some personal knowledge involved inside the accident.
[01:04:32.000 --> 01:04:37.000]  That's why it's not the accident that's how to stop. Then I try to get my brother before they take me out of the courtroom to object to it,
[01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:40.000]  saying that I'm not a fact witness.
[01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:45.000]  The lucky bigger thing was, I put my brother, he had two trials that day.
[01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:51.000]  It was on the 18th of January, that next time they call me for a witness because he's going to do it again and he tried it.
[01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:55.000]  I put my brother to call me up as a witness so I could talk for him.
[01:04:55.000 --> 01:05:02.000]  The prosecutor on the second trial was questioning me, cross-examining.
[01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  I was trying to get all this, in fact, the definition of driver and all sorts of other things, whether he was not driving up time or not.
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:13.000]  It just went pretty bad.
[01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:18.000]  The judge allowed it, of course, to ignite all the motions that I followed for my brother.
[01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:25.000]  My brother, effectively, should have gotten 31 jurors dismissed at the time, out of 33.
[01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:32.000]  With your questions that you provided to us during your press announcement, that all got denied as well.
[01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:37.000]  My brother didn't know how to do anything. He didn't really study as much as I thought he would.
[01:05:37.000 --> 01:05:44.000]  Basically, in a new trial, what should I do from now on? Keep doing everything that I've been doing?
[01:05:44.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  Well, are you talking about for your brother? If your brother's not putting any effort into this to learn what he's supposed to do so we can do it properly, then you're doing all this for nothing.
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:06:05.000]  The worst thing in the world you can do is get on the stand and try to define those terms. Don't ever do that. Don't do that.
[01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  You are not ever going to educate that jury.
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:17.000]  You're simply not. They are too indoctrinated into what they think the reality of the world is.
[01:06:17.000 --> 01:06:35.000]  The proper defense to a transportation charge is to object to the use of the terms, not to define them, but to object to their use because they don't apply.
[01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:39.000]  You understand what I'm saying? Yes, I do.
[01:06:39.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  When the prosecutor or the witness uses a word like operates, vehicle, driver, driving, anything of that nature, objection assumes facts not in evidence, not agreed to, and requires a legal conclusion by the fact witness.
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:17.000]  That is how you negate a transportation charge. That's all there is to it. State cannot prove standing if it cannot prove transportation.
[01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  I wrote a seven-page order of trial for my brother the whole time, and the suspect that he blew it was pretty extensive. I shouldn't have done that for him. I did tell him to do that, but I have no way of knowing if he did it or not.
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  You guys need to be coming to more of the classes and paying attention to this because it's not always as straightforward as arguing the terminology. We don't want to argue the terminology. Why? Because that works against us, not for us.
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:08:12.000]  I avoided my trial by, I disqualified the judge there, so they had to reschedule me for a different trial date, probably in January next year. I have not gone to trial yet. I've been avoided.
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  They rescheduled you for trial a year from now? Yes, that's what they do. They only hold jury... No, that's not what they do. That's denying you a speedy trial. When did this begin? June, no, it was May.
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  File a motion to dismiss. Failure to provide a speedy trial, and make sure it's a dismissal with prejudice.
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:52.000]  All right, I'll do that. Let me go back to tomorrow when I whisper. I disqualified the judge in that place as well for sending me, getting mentally evaluated.
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  The new judge, he withdrew that order saying that he don't think that. I couldn't find anything other than jurisdiction to challenge the judge at the time. He kept giving rulings and stuff, saying that I was properly served, I was properly notified, I was properly...
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:31.000]  Really? When did you get a copy of the complaint? The day of that pre-trial. I objected to that as well, saying Article 450180, one day, 24 hours prior to any court proceeding, and he said he denied it, he overruled it, and I asked for...
[01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  Was this Jenkins? I'm sorry? Was this Jenkins? No, King Gordon. This is in Westward, and he just kept denying everything, and I asked for findings, effects, and conclusions of law. I'm not sure that the rules on that one.
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:10:07.000]  They're not going to give you a finding of facts and conclusions of law on that. They're going to ignore that request no matter what, especially at this level. Okay, remember, we don't do what we do to win the case at trial.
[01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:24.000]  Why? You can't win the case at trial. You can't. The game is rigged, the deck is stacked, the roulette well is magnetized, and the ball is electrified to be attracted to where they want it to land.
[01:10:24.000 --> 01:10:48.000]  Okay? What your job is, is to document where the game is rigged and where the cheats occurred. Why? So the appellate court can look at it and go, you know what, this guy was railroaded, he made the documentation that showed he was railroaded.
[01:10:48.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  We don't have any choice but to overturn this ruling. Guess what that does for you? It gives you a wide open eight lane highway to sue the crap out of them town. Okay?
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:22.000]  Also, I have a, in relation to the appeals court, because I do want to do that. I'll try the lawsuit. I guess it's the best way after it goes to the appellate court before actually filing a lawsuit against them, just to give more...
[01:11:22.000 --> 01:11:44.000]  You have to get the case decided in your favor before the lawsuit's going to do you any good for anything other than the denial of due process. If you can get the verdict overturned or the judgment overturned, then you have a malicious prosecution cause of action, which means you can go after the prosecutor as well.
[01:11:44.000 --> 01:12:06.000]  That's what we want. We don't want just the judge. We want these idiotic city and county attorneys that the judge is criminally conspiring with to deny us our right of due process. We don't want to get rid of one idiot. We want to get rid of both idiots.
[01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  Okay. That is all my questions for now. Okay. That's why we make the record in writing. Do not go to court expecting to win. Go to court expecting to have lots of things to document and do so.
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:50.000]  Okay. And I guess I just thought of one more. When you file these motions and the judge refuses to sign the order that goes with them, that you submit with them and just kind of denies it or doesn't even mention them, the best way to show that within the record is when you do the motion for a new trial outline site that he denied these motions without any...
[01:12:50.000 --> 01:13:04.000]  You're supposed to keep a checklist that has every motion you filed and that checklist should tell you whether or not that motion was granted or denied, what judge did so, and when.
[01:13:04.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  Okay. Then you take that and you attach that as an attachment to your motion for new trial and then, yes, you can assert the judge denied the following motions but refused to sign an order to that effect.
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:23.000]  Okay. And that's it.
[01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:25.000]  All right.
[01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:28.000]  All right, well, that's cool then. Okay. Thank you, Eddie.
[01:13:28.000 --> 01:13:29.000]  Okay.
[01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  All right.
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:33.000]  All right. Have a good night, Samuel. Thanks for calling in.
[01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:45.000]  All right, folks, here is the problem. The caller board is empty. That means you're going to be listening to me alone all over again if you don't get on the caller board.
[01:13:45.000 --> 01:13:47.000]  Okay.
[01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:59.000]  Now, when we were talking about all this earlier on the motion for new trial and everything with the way the Austin Municipal Court is doing things, they're not alone in this boat.
[01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:07.000]  Every one of these courts, especially in Texas, are doing it wrong.
[01:14:07.000 --> 01:14:20.000]  Not just in one way, not just in a couple of ways, but in virtually every aspect possible, they are doing it wrong.
[01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:30.000]  When I have gone through the statutes, I am in the process of drawing a step-by-step statute activation map.
[01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:38.000]  When this occurs, here's the statutes involved. When this occurs, here's the statutes that are involved.
[01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:44.000]  And it roadmaps everything step-by-step from beginning to end.
[01:14:44.000 --> 01:15:04.000]  When you look at this, it very quickly draws a picture of the statutes they do it one way, and these courts are doing it in absolutely no way, even remotely resembling what the statutes require.
[01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  It seriously looks like they all got together and says, well, it doesn't matter what the law says. Let's all of us agree on the way we want to do it so that we get the cases processed as quickly as possible.
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  We get the revenue as quickly as possible, and we deprive every one of their right of due process as efficiently as possible, but in such a way as to make the individual feel like they got treated fairly.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  I'm here to tell you, the moment you set foot inside the doorways of these buildings that call themselves courts, fairness is a freaking ghost.
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:59.000]  Call it Casper. It's out of here. It's gone. It's ethereal. It doesn't exist.
[01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:10.000]  Fairness is as alien to our current court systems as morals and principles are to Obama.
[01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  They don't exist. Say or do whatever you have to right now to get done what you want done.
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:31.000]  That's it. Justice or anything else, that's an illusion.
[01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:45.000]  Till we bring it back in reality, this is where we've got ourselves, our children, and our grandchildren having to bend for themselves.
[01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:55.000]  It's time to stop it. Hi, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. Caller board is still empty. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:55.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  We've got about 45 minutes left, so let's get busy.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:08.000]  Capital Coin & Bullion is a family-owned business built on the promise to bring you affordable pricing on all coin and bullion products.
[01:17:08.000 --> 01:17:17.000]  In addition to coins and bullion, we now offer storeable freeze-dried foods produced by Augustin Farms, ammunition at 10% above wholesale prices,
[01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:25.000]  Berkey water products, gift certificates, and our Silver Pool, a new way to guarantee silver by prepaying at a locked price.
[01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  We can even help you set up a metals IRA account. Call us at 512-646-6440 for more details.
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:40.000]  As always, we buy, sell, and trade precious metals, give appraisals, and cater to those with all sizes of coin collections.
[01:17:40.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half a mile north of Canig, next to the Ikiban Sushi and Jeanne Carwash.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:57.000]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2. Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440
[01:17:57.000 --> 01:18:01.000]  and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:03.000]  What's been the problem with phone companies?
[01:18:03.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  High prices and contracts that lock you in for two years minimum, not FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  Freedom Telephones are designed around the concept and reality of patriotism, loyalty, and privacy.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:21.000]  With FreedomTelephones.com, there are no contracts, no credit checks, and no social security numbers required.
[01:18:21.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  That's why our name is FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  Finally, residential, mobile, and business telephones and plans that are private and never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:38.000]  When a low price, residential and business plans started only $14.99 and mobile plans started just $39.99.
[01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:44.000]  Plus, every month you pay your bill, FreedomTelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs.
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  Don't wait. Support the cause and get the highest quality and the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:56.000]  That's 800-600-5553.
[01:18:56.000 --> 01:19:25.000]  FreedomTelephones.com, portable, private, perfect.
[01:19:25.000 --> 01:19:29.000]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:29.000 --> 01:19:33.000]  Call in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:19:33.000 --> 01:19:40.000]  Debra, you said you found the information regarding something on the regulatory signs and all that.
[01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:48.000]  Yes, I did. I went back and did a search through all the archive descriptions to find this guest that the Freemind report,
[01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:53.000]  actually at the time that they had him on, it was a radio, the name of the show was Radio Free Oklahoma.
[01:19:53.000 --> 01:19:59.000]  The gentleman's name is Chad Dornsife, D-O-R-N-S-I-F-E.
[01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:05.000]  And his website is motoristswrites.com.
[01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:15.000]  That's M-O-T-O-R-I-S-T-S, so motoristspluralwrites-R-I-G-T-S.com.
[01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:20.000]  And right on the homepage, it says it right here, folks, according to one of his studies,
[01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:24.000]  and this is a culmination of about 12 years worth of research,
[01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:37.000]  today more than 90% of traffic citations issued and the majority of traffic stops have no factual foundation from a safety perspective.
[01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  Period. All right, and it says worse is the entitlement attitude of public officials who sustain and expand these revenue streams
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:51.000]  and power for themselves in their interest-aligned constituents, not we the people.
[01:20:51.000 --> 01:21:00.000]  The problem is compounded by a faux court system whose very existence has become dependent on these illicit enterprises
[01:21:00.000 --> 01:21:05.000]  where the rule of law need not apply, but they do have payment plans.
[01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:09.000]  Okay, couldn't be more true here, folks.
[01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:18.000]  And there is a direct link on the homepage where it says 90% of traffic citations issued have no factual foundation in a safety perspective.
[01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:27.000]  That links to his PowerPoint study. It's actually a PDF document that specifically talks about this research that was done in Montana
[01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:41.000]  where it showed specifically there was a significant decrease in traffic injuries, traffic fatalities, accidents, any kind of traffic related problems, et cetera,
[01:21:41.000 --> 01:21:44.000]  when they took away the speed limit signs.
[01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:49.000]  So there you have it, folks, motoristsright.com.
[01:21:49.000 --> 01:21:57.000]  The gentleman's name is Chad Dornsife, and we may want to get him on the show sometime because he's done a lot of research nationwide.
[01:21:57.000 --> 01:22:03.000]  He's got best highway safety practices, practice papers.
[01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:14.000]  Basically, he's done a lot of research to show what really needs to be done here in the interest of safety instead of revenue generation.
[01:22:14.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  So there you have it again, folks, motoristsright.com.
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:24.000]  The gentleman's name is Chad Dornsife, and he's got a contact information on his website.
[01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:27.000]  I highly recommend checking out his site.
[01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  Okay, I believe we have some calls on the board now, Eddie.
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:35.000]  All right, well, let's take them and see what they got to say.
[01:22:35.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  Okay, first up here would appear to be Wendy in California.
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:43.000]  Wendy, what can we do for you?
[01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:55.000]  Hi, Eddie, I was wondering if you might be able to review a bit of what's in your traffic package and then also what it would entail to translate it for California or any other state?
[01:22:55.000 --> 01:22:58.000]  Like, how do you give an effort that would be?
[01:22:58.000 --> 01:23:07.000]  Well, as far as what's in the traffic seminar, the traffic seminar is a two-fold purpose.
[01:23:07.000 --> 01:23:14.000]  One is to educate people about what the reality of the transportation code for Texas actually is.
[01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:16.000]  It's commercial in nature.
[01:23:16.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  It has nothing to do with anybody else.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:27.000]  The second thing it does is it teaches people how to read and understand statutory law.
[01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  You have to learn how to read and comprehend law and the terms and phrases defined in that law.
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:47.000]  If you don't read the law properly, then you get a mixed bag of ideas as to what it actually means and how it applies.
[01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:53.000]  It's imperative that you learn the proper way to read a statute.
[01:23:53.000 --> 01:23:57.000]  Those are the things the traffic seminar tries to do.
[01:23:57.000 --> 01:24:08.000]  It teaches you to understand some basic concepts on some of the terms that are there, such as person and individual, among others.
[01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  It teaches you how to dissect a statute and follow what I refer to as its rabbit trails.
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  Every statute is comprised of terms and phrases that will themselves have their own separate definitions.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:37.000]  You have to learn to pick out those words and phrases and go look up the definition for them so that you fully understand the statute in which they're used.
[01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  Otherwise, here's the problem.
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  Statutes are intentionally written using common language words, and we are told in the beginning that we are to read the statute with reference to the common use and understanding of a term or phrase.
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:03.000]  But then there's a little caveat.
[01:25:03.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  The caveat is, except we're specifically defined or altered or changed or meant to be something different.
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:19.000]  Statutes in different states worded in different ways.
[01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:30.000]  The simple gist is, we're going to use words you're familiar with, and we expect you to treat them just like they're the words you're familiar with as far as your understanding.
[01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:40.000]  Unless we gave them a different meaning by defining them in the statute itself, which they do.
[01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:52.000]  What you get confused about is when you use the common meaning instead of the one they define that completely alters how the statute is to be read and what it affects.
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:57.000]  So that's what the traffic seminar does.
[01:25:57.000 --> 01:26:24.000]  Part of what we've come to do in that, I took it upon myself to start writing legal documents to file in court that address both the due process issues that the courts compound in the process of a case and also the transportation issues themselves when it comes to making arguments about why they don't apply.
[01:26:24.000 --> 01:26:31.000]  So that's what's in the traffic material as to how much effort it is to convert it.
[01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:38.000]  That is an impossible question to answer because it will vary by state.
[01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:49.000]  How much it will vary will depend entirely on how similar to Texas that state statute may be.
[01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  It will vary completely depending upon whether or not your state defines them as criminal offenses or civil offenses.
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  It will vary depending upon what the due process procedures are in your state about whether it's civil or criminal.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  There's no way I can accurately or even begin to conceptually answer that part of your question, Wendy, that I don't know.
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  That's an effort someone will have to undertake and then they will have to say it was this hard or it wasn't this hard.
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  Okay, but I guess depending on say each person's issues for their particular ticket they got, they only have to translate those parts of it that apply to their case, right?
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  I don't recommend that and the reason for that is is what you're talking about is addressing merits when that's the last thing you want to do.
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:28:02.000]  When you only go to the part that deals specifically with your case, there's two ways you can understand that.
[01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  The due process procedures involving my case or the actual charge involving my case.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:26.000]  Due process, fine, by all means, learn what the rules are that they're supposed to follow in order to begin, hold, and complete your case.
[01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  Okay, that's very important no matter where you are.
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  But whether or not you want to argue merits, that's a whole other animal.
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:51.000]  Now I can tell you that I have red statutes in California that make it very, very clear, even clearer than it is in Texas, that the California statutes only apply to commercial vehicles.
[01:28:51.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  They've never applied to anything else nor does any type of traffic ticket in California apply to anything else.
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:10.000]  Except, yeah, it's hard to know though because then there will be a law in the California vehicle code that says no, it applies to all cars.
[01:29:10.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  It seems like they just want to ignore that.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:20.000]  No, what you'll find is when they read it, it'll say it applies to all vehicles.
[01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  Are you in a vehicle or are you in a car?
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:28.000]  I'm in a car.
[01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  Yes, are you in a vehicle or are you in a car?
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  Okay, when it says it applies to all vehicles, you need to know what a vehicle is.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  What does that term mean?
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  Does it apply to you?
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  All right, Wendy, hang on, we'll finish this up on the other side, Carrie, I see you there, hang on, we'll pick you up as well.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984, this is Rule of Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:04.000]  Top 10 reasons to question the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing.
[01:30:04.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  Reason number 10, what is on the surveillance tapes?
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  There were many video surveillance cameras that recorded the morning of the bombing.
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:14.000]  Yet, the few of these that have been released do not show what transpired with the rider truck at the Murrow Building.
[01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:19.000]  Most recently, the government has claimed that all of the cameras that were in different buildings and maintained by different businesses
[01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:23.000]  were all having their tapes changed at the exact same time, 9.02 a.m.
[01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  This is insulting to the memory of those who perished in the bombing.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  What is being hidden from us? For more information, please go to okcbombingtruth.com.
[01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  Ouch, that's how consumers are reacting after being victimized by pins.
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:40.000]  No, not sewing pins, we're talking about debit card pin numbers.
[01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:43.000]  But the result is still quite painful.
[01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:47.000]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht and I'll be back with a prickly tale in just a moment.
[01:30:47.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:57.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:57.000 --> 01:31:02.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:31:02.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com.
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:12.000]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:16.000]  Start over with Start Page.
[01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:21.000]  Pin pads. They're those high-tech boxes at checkouts for paying with debit and credit cards.
[01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:25.000]  Customers punch in a four-digit code called a pin number for extra protection.
[01:31:25.000 --> 01:31:30.000]  Since only the customer handles the card and the pin data is encrypted, you might think the systems are safe.
[01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  But think again, thieves recently compromised dozens of the pads at Michael's craft stores in 20 states,
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  intercepting hundreds of card numbers and pins.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:45.000]  Then they used the information to steal money from shop or bank accounts using ATM machines hundreds of miles away.
[01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  The moral? Using debit and credit cards can be risky business. The most secure form of payment is cash.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:32:17.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:28.000]  Hi, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:34.000]  Alright, we got about a half an hour left in the show. We are talking to Wendy in California.
[01:32:34.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  Let's see if we can get her wrapped up here. Alright, Wendy. Anything else?
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:44.000]  No, I think that covers it pretty well. Thank you.
[01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:47.000]  Yes, ma'am. Thanks for calling in. Greatly appreciate it.
[01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:55.000]  Okay. Alright, now let's go to Carrie in Texas. Carrie, what can we do for you?
[01:32:55.000 --> 01:33:00.000]  Hey, Eddie. I've been enjoying your show. Listen to you going home from a meeting every Monday night.
[01:33:00.000 --> 01:33:09.000]  And I just have a side question. I mean, if I got a ticket and if I could hire an attorney, I mean, not everybody can afford to do that.
[01:33:09.000 --> 01:33:12.000]  But should he be able to do these things or do they all do?
[01:33:12.000 --> 01:33:17.000]  Do all the attorneys that you hired represent you in a traffic citation?
[01:33:17.000 --> 01:33:20.000]  Are they looking at your best interests or do they have to kind of...
[01:33:20.000 --> 01:33:22.000]  How much is your ticket?
[01:33:22.000 --> 01:33:25.000]  I don't have one right now. I just got out of one down at the...
[01:33:25.000 --> 01:33:29.000]  Well, but I'm just saying, on average, what's your average traffic ticket cost?
[01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:33.000]  Oh, you know, it could be $300.
[01:33:33.000 --> 01:33:42.000]  Well, the ticket itself can be only a maximum of $200, except in certain cases. And then, of course, you've got the court cost added on top of that.
[01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  Now, depending upon the type of conviction, you may also wind up with those surcharges on there for three years, which will be $250 a year minimum.
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  Okay?
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:56.000]  Right.
[01:33:56.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  Your ticket could cost you anywhere from $1,000 long term to just the ticket fine and court cost, which could be small to up to the $300 or so.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:14.000]  Now, you hire an attorney, he wants $1,500.
[01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:15.000]  Yeah.
[01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:18.000]  You know what you're going to get for that $1,500?
[01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:20.000]  No.
[01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:22.000]  Nothing.
[01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:33.000]  Your $1,500 is going to buy you pain and frustration of calling your attorney's office and going, what the hell are you doing?
[01:34:33.000 --> 01:34:35.000]  Okay?
[01:34:35.000 --> 01:34:42.000]  That's what your $1,500 is going to buy, because he's not going to court for you.
[01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:52.000]  He is not going to argue your case for you. He is not going to attempt to make a single one of the necessary defenses to your case.
[01:34:52.000 --> 01:35:00.000]  You don't believe that? Bring up the defenses that are listed in my court filings and see what he says.
[01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:03.000]  All that don't mean nothing. All that doesn't mean anything.
[01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:06.000]  That's frivolous. That doesn't mean jack squat.
[01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:07.000]  Right.
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:15.000]  Remember, this is an attorney saying that the law doesn't mean anything.
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:17.000]  Okay?
[01:35:17.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  So, instead of spending $1,500 and winding up just pissed off at the world because you know your money was stolen,
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  then since you already know that it's being stolen by the traffic court, just give it to them instead and come out cheaper.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:39.000]  Okay.
[01:35:39.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  Or, you know, I mean, I educate myself, but I mean, you have courses that I don't know.
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:56.000]  I work. I have a job. I don't have time to do it or not. It'd be very satisfying to be able to do that, I'm sure.
[01:35:56.000 --> 01:36:06.000]  Trust me, it is more satisfying than most things you'll ever accomplish in life to walk into a courtroom and have them look at you
[01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  like you got three heads and know that the very first thought in their mind is how in the hell do we get rid of this guy?
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:19.000]  Sir, your case was dismissed.
[01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:22.000]  Okay.
[01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  So, what's even better is when you get them to take you to trial and you know you got railroaded and you documented you got railroaded,
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:37.000]  and then you take them to federal court and prove you got railroaded,
[01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:45.000]  and then when you're sitting in their old kitchen staring out through their nice bay window across what used to be their lawn
[01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:55.000]  and their dejected, homeless ass sitting on the sidewalk, you can grin to yourself and think, yeah, that was fun.
[01:36:55.000 --> 01:36:59.000]  You tell me which one you prefer.
[01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  I live in Central Texas. Is there a list of attorneys that would actually fight for you?
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:18.000]  Okay, hold your hand up and look in the middle of it. You see the writing there?
[01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:19.000]  Zero, huh?
[01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:24.000]  Zero. That's as long as the list you would have would be.
[01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:27.000]  Yeah.
[01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:30.000]  That's a shame, yeah.
[01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:38.000]  Well, it's understandable. If these guys could make these arguments, they would never get to go to court again.
[01:37:38.000 --> 01:37:49.000]  If they went in there and actually fought the court for doing what the court does, these guys would never be allowed to defend anybody else in front of that judge.
[01:37:49.000 --> 01:37:54.000]  That's what I was thinking. They would be blacklisted.
[01:37:54.000 --> 01:38:06.000]  Yeah, everything that they bring to court, the judge would jump on them with, you know, aerator's shoes.
[01:38:06.000 --> 01:38:15.000]  No attorney is going to fight the correct good fight. It's not in his best interest, financial or otherwise.
[01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:25.000]  And any attorney that's willing to do right over wrong isn't going to be an attorney for long.
[01:38:25.000 --> 01:38:27.000]  Are you still there?
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:28.000]  Yes, I'm here.
[01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:29.000]  Okay.
[01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  He's just packing up the run while he's talking to us.
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  Yeah, it sounds like it.
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  I'm just trying to get in my gay here. Very interesting. No, I really enjoy your program and I need to look into the cases.
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:39:00.000]  I just used to get sick every few weeks and I've tried to cut down on that as I've gotten older, but still, it's always a railroad situation.
[01:39:00.000 --> 01:39:02.000]  Oh, absolutely always a railroad situation.
[01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  I've got stories to tell.
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:18.000]  I guarantee you the last thing in the world a prosecuting attorney wants to see is someone with the information I have sitting as a judge.
[01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:23.000]  Because this will be a unique case in all of history.
[01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:30.000]  The defendant comes forward and the prosecutor and arresting officer are the ones that goes to jail.
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  Yeah.
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:43.000]  Because that's exactly what would happen if I were sitting as a judge in these cases.
[01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  And it would take a very small set of questions to each of the three individuals and that would be all the evidence I need to make my warrants and have them incarcerated.
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:40:00.000]  Hmm.
[01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:01.000]  Anything else?
[01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  An erosion of our liberties over time or was it like this 50 years ago or?
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:09.000]  No, this has definitely been erosion of our liberties over time.
[01:40:09.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  It is the wild hog scenario, the proverb of the wild pigs all over again.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:28.000]  If you're not familiar with that, go on the internet and do a search for how to trap wild hogs.
[01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:36.000]  And there will be some real world pig traps out there and then you're going to come across one that's a story.
[01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  And that story is going to tell you how this gentleman caught this herd of wild pigs that nobody else had been able to catch.
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:58.000]  And you're going to see exactly how it works and exactly where we have allowed ourselves to be led as a nation and as a people and as individuals.
[01:40:58.000 --> 01:41:03.000]  I agree.
[01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:04.000]  Can't lay down.
[01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:07.000]  I know we got kids and grandkids.
[01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:10.000]  So it's only getting worse.
[01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  That's true.
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:15.000]  I don't want to leave the world in this state for them to live in.
[01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:18.000]  That's the truth.
[01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:29.000]  I want them to understand that when a public servant walks up to them, the first thing they ought to do is bow and say, may I help you?
[01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:34.000]  And I swear the next time I walk up to a public servant and they go, what do you want?
[01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:42.000]  Well, what I want right now is to reach across this counter, snatch your ugly face to this side and smack it a couple of times for the way you address me.
[01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:44.000]  Then I want to fire you.
[01:41:44.000 --> 01:41:48.000]  Now, would you like to reconsider the manner you ask that question and try again?
[01:41:48.000 --> 01:41:53.000]  Or do we need to move up the chain?
[01:41:53.000 --> 01:42:05.000]  These people need to learn who they work for and it isn't the person in the office with them.
[01:42:05.000 --> 01:42:09.000]  That's just the person who directs their actions.
[01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  It's not who they work for.
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:21.000]  And we need to educate them to that real quick.
[01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:23.000]  Anything else, Carrie?
[01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  No, I appreciate it. Thanks for the info.
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:27.000]  Yep. Yes, sir. Thank you for calling in.
[01:42:27.000 --> 01:42:29.000]  Greatly appreciated.
[01:42:29.000 --> 01:42:32.000]  All right. We are going to go to Doug in Texas.
[01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:35.000]  We got about a minute and a half before break.
[01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:37.000]  Doug, what can we do for you?
[01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:40.000]  Well, I shouldn't say too much.
[01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:48.000]  I was telling you, I think last week about the Bastrop City Police Department.
[01:42:48.000 --> 01:42:56.000]  It's contracted with some little firm in Tempe, Arizona to put up their little cameras.
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  And they sent me a little courtesy thing showing my truck on the stop place where you go through red.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  And then it's on, you know, as I'm exiting on the other side, it's red.
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:22.000]  But I know this is all academic and it's not really important because they're not finding me.
[01:43:22.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  They're just trying to train me to obey their little rules and do this and that.
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  And they have like a half-second play between them.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:41.000]  Okay. Well, hang on, Doug. We're going to go to break.
[01:43:41.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:47.000]  We got one segment left after we get back.
[01:43:47.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  Call in number is 512-646-1984. Anthony, I see you there on the board.
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  Hang on. We'll pick you guys up on the other side. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  Hey, did you hear? Ron Paul has announced he's running for president in 2012.
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Who's Ron Paul?
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  Really? Okay, put down the cell phone for one minute.
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:11.000]  Your friends really don't care about your Twitter updates on what you had for breakfast.
[01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:14.000]  Oh, but I'd like to make those little smiley faces with punctuation marks.
[01:44:14.000 --> 01:44:15.000]  Of course you do.
[01:44:15.000 --> 01:44:21.000]  Now, listen closely. You need to go down to Brave New Books and learn as much as you can about Ron Paul and his message before it's too late.
[01:44:21.000 --> 01:44:24.000]  They have all of his books and many of the books he talks about.
[01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:29.000]  They also have t-shirts, bumper stickers, and yard signs so that you can show your support for him during the campaign.
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  Brave New Books? Do they have Harry Potter and Twilight?
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:38.000]  No, but they do carry a large selection of survival and preparedness books to protect your family in time of emergency.
[01:44:38.000 --> 01:44:40.000]  That sounds like that show on the Discovery Channel.
[01:44:40.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  Yeah, there's even a wilderness survival expert that teaches classes called Earth Skills School that you can sign up for on the website BraveNewBookstore.com.
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:48.000]  What are you doing?
[01:44:48.000 --> 01:44:53.000]  I'm tweeting all my friends that they should go to BraveNewBookstore.com or down to the bookstore in person.
[01:44:53.000 --> 01:44:54.000]  Where's it located?
[01:44:54.000 --> 01:44:56.000]  1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:44:56.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  There, it's sent. I even read a smiley face.
[01:44:58.000 --> 01:44:59.000]  Great.
[01:45:03.000 --> 01:45:06.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:06.000 --> 01:45:10.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:45:10.000 --> 01:45:18.000]  The affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:18.000 --> 01:45:22.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:22.000 --> 01:45:25.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:25.000 --> 01:45:30.000]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:30.000 --> 01:45:37.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:37.000 --> 01:45:46.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:46.000 --> 01:45:55.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:55.000 --> 01:46:04.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:25.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is the last segment of the show for tonight.
[01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:56.000]  This is the last chance you have to get anything you want to know answered before the ring of the bell in the end of the show.
[01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:59.000]  Unfortunately, I don't know if we're going to make it that far.
[01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:03.000]  We're going to finish up with Doug and then we're going to get to Anthony.
[01:47:03.000 --> 01:47:07.000]  Alright Doug, do you have a specific question relating to this ticket?
[01:47:07.000 --> 01:47:10.000]  Is it an actual red light camera ticket?
[01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:20.000]  No, it's a courtesy. They're letting me know they're grooming me for in the future.
[01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:28.000]  It's a courtesy warning that they actually have photographic evidence in my vehicle.
[01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:41.000]  So it's something they sent out saying that, hey, we're sending you this warning notice that we have, what is it, a stop light camera or a speed camera?
[01:47:41.000 --> 01:48:01.000]  A stop light camera and it shows me on one side of the stop light where it's red and it shows me on the other side of the stop light where it's red, but it doesn't show me in the intersection when it's red.
[01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:16.000]  But I mean, that's all. I mean, that's all a joke. But what I was asking you is would you like me to rent a big billboard there telling people to dial such and such a number?
[01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:23.000]  Because we know that we can't subpoena the camera in there and cross-examine it.
[01:48:23.000 --> 01:48:30.000]  And they are in tempi areas. I don't know what in the hell they have to do with past truck taxes.
[01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  Okay, again, what I've said dozens of times about these is these tickets amount to a bill of attainder.
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:45.000]  They are civil. They are not criminal. They don't go through the same process as any other type of traffic citation.
[01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:56.000]  They are a bill, well, they're bill of pains and penalties technically speaking. What they are is an administrative determination of guilt without a judicial finding effect.
[01:48:56.000 --> 01:49:05.000]  Okay, so you challenge them based on that grounds. They are in every way violative of the right of due process.
[01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  You cannot cross-examine the camera. Anything the officer testifies to understand regarding the equipment or anything about it is absolute hearsay and therefore inadmissible.
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:32.000]  There is no reasonable lawful due process providing method to win a red light camera ticket as the accuser.
[01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:37.000]  They simply are that devoid of authority.
[01:49:37.000 --> 01:49:44.000]  Can you explain that? I just wanted to rest and get the benefit of your explanation.
[01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:51.000]  And I'll see you down there. You've got your class.
[01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:59.000]  Class is every Sunday from two to five and then from five to six. We talk about individual cases if we have any.
[01:49:59.000 --> 01:50:09.000]  I don't have any individual case, but I would like to shove a little money in your directions.
[01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:21.000]  Well, we always welcome that. Donations are appreciated and most welcome. It's getting hard to buy bread right now. Every time I go to the grocery store, I give them more money, but I walk out with smaller or less bags.
[01:50:21.000 --> 01:50:30.000]  Well, okay, we'll work on that, Eddie. I'll be down there Sunday, I guess, or I'll leave something with the following.
[01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:33.000]  All right, Doug. We appreciate it. Thank you greatly.
[01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:36.000]  You deserve it, honey. All right.
[01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:38.000]  All right. Thanks, Doug.
[01:50:38.000 --> 01:50:40.000]  Yeah. Bye-bye.
[01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:45.000]  Bye-bye. All right. Now we're going to go to Anthony in Texas. Anthony, what can we do for you?
[01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:54.000]  Hi there. Good evening. Back in October, I received a texting while driving ticket and just to make a long story short, I went...
[01:50:54.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  A texting while what ticket?
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:50:58.000]  A texting while driving.
[01:50:58.000 --> 01:50:59.000]  Were you?
[01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:13.000]  No. I was actually disconnecting a phone call and as I passed the officer where he was stationed here in Austin on Riverside Drive, I guess when he saw me deactivating the phone call, that's when he thought I was, I guess, texting.
[01:51:13.000 --> 01:51:15.000]  Because on the ticket itself.
[01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:23.000]  Okay. Well, here's the problem. First off, how in the hell could a police officer see anything you were doing?
[01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:25.000]  That's exactly what I said.
[01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:38.000]  Okay. The second problem here is you weren't driving. Okay. You feel that close haircut pass where I asked you, were you? You completely missed that.
[01:51:38.000 --> 01:51:46.000]  You weren't driving to begin with, were you? You weren't in a taxi cab or a shuttle bus or a semi or operating a school bus, were you?
[01:51:46.000 --> 01:51:49.000]  No. Then what was I doing behind my...
[01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:51.000]  You were traveling in your car.
[01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:55.000]  Okay. I see. All right.
[01:51:55.000 --> 01:52:24.000]  Okay. But the point here being is there is no reasonable conceptual method short of the cop laying on top of your car and staring down through the moon or sunroof or running alongside your car at such a speed as to be able to watch everything you're doing from the outside that they can say with any level of certainty you were texting.
[01:52:24.000 --> 01:52:35.000]  If he can do that, then all you got to say is, can you please tell me what the text message said?
[01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:43.000]  Now, if the officer is going to testify that you were texting, he'd damn well better be able to testify as to what you said.
[01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:46.000]  Correct. And he will.
[01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:49.000]  Really? He's got your phone log?
[01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:52.000]  I do, actually.
[01:52:52.000 --> 01:52:54.000]  No, does he?
[01:52:54.000 --> 01:52:58.000]  I can pull up that day.
[01:52:58.000 --> 01:53:01.000]  No, I know you can. He doesn't have it, right?
[01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:03.000]  Correct.
[01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:11.000]  So, what's he going to testify to do? What message did I send at the time you're stating I was texting?
[01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:14.000]  All right.
[01:53:14.000 --> 01:53:24.000]  Okay, you're saying I was texting. That means you could read what was on my phone. What did it say?
[01:53:24.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  Right, and he won't be able to.
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:28.000]  Exactly.
[01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:40.000]  So, in other words, you presume that I was texting simply because you saw me touch a key on the phone. Isn't that correct, officer?
[01:53:40.000 --> 01:53:49.000]  We're here because you falsely presumed something you have absolutely no evidence of?
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:53.000]  Right.
[01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:54.000]  Okay.
[01:53:54.000 --> 01:54:06.000]  Or are you going to testify that you have illegally, without a warrant, bugged my automobile with a hidden video camera?
[01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:08.000]  And, of course, he'll say no to that.
[01:54:08.000 --> 01:54:23.000]  Yeah, you can have a lot of fun with these morons on the stand if you'll just think about all the ridiculous possibilities associated with what they're trying to say you did.
[01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:25.000]  Right?
[01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:32.000]  You can have so much fun making this cop look like the utter fool that he is. It's not even funny.
[01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:36.000]  Don't get me wrong, people. I don't dislike all cops.
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:40.000]  Some cops died.
[01:54:40.000 --> 01:54:43.000]  Okay? I don't dislike them at all. And no, I'm kidding.
[01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:59.000]  I have nothing against police officers. What I have a problem with is guys that won't use common sense and think their only job is to take a bunch of idiotic rules and hammer them onto everybody they see.
[01:54:59.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  And that's all these Austin and most any other municipal cops in Texas are doing. I loathe to even call them cops anymore.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:14.000]  I loathe to call them law enforcement, except that's literally what they are.
[01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:20.000]  They're not peace officers. They are strictly law enforcement.
[01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:29.000]  And they think that's the only job that matters. Enforcing a law, no matter who or what it does or does not apply to.
[01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:45.000]  One of the simple questions I was going to ask him in my cross examination, I just wanted to ask him if it was possible for him to determine with 100% certainty whether I was texting or deactivating the phone call in that brief moment that he observed me.
[01:55:45.000 --> 01:55:53.000]  And that's fine. But why highly recommend you set him up for some of those impossible answers before you get that far?
[01:55:53.000 --> 01:55:58.000]  Because once he's got that testimony out there that, well, I don't know what you sent.
[01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:06.000]  Well, if you don't know what I sent, then you cannot 100% certainly determine what I was actually doing, can you?
[01:56:06.000 --> 01:56:09.000]  You see the benefit of having that in the works already?
[01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:11.000]  Yeah, that way he won't be able to retract anything.
[01:56:11.000 --> 01:56:26.000]  Exactly. So setting him up with a bunch of ridiculous options that you know there's only one way for him to answer, unless he's going to lie, in which case when he goes, yeah, you sent the following text.
[01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:31.000]  Now, here's a possibility. He gets his hands on your phone logs.
[01:56:31.000 --> 01:56:38.000]  He actually gets a warrant and goes and gets them from the phone company, or the prosecutor does.
[01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:49.000]  Now they've got the problem of matching up the timestamp on the citation with the timestamp in your call log for any text that were sent.
[01:56:49.000 --> 01:57:07.000]  So make sure that you have an accurate log written down that you can access right then and there for that day of all text messages coming in or out and the date and timestamp on them.
[01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:23.000]  Then if they try to bring up some ludicrous assertion, you've got something right there that you can show the court along with the phone as proof that your log is accurate, that they're lying through their teeth.
[01:57:23.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  Right. So simple set of questions, you know, asking him if he can tell me what message I was texting, obviously he won't be able to.
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:38.000]  Well, first off, establish where he was in relation to you. How far away from my car were you?
[01:57:38.000 --> 01:57:42.000]  What direction of travel were you in comparison to my direction of travel?
[01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:45.000]  Were we passing each other in opposite directions?
[01:57:45.000 --> 01:57:48.000]  Were we at 90 degree angles to each other?
[01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:51.000]  Were you on a motorcycle or were you in a cruiser?
[01:57:51.000 --> 01:57:53.000]  Are your windows tinted?
[01:57:53.000 --> 01:58:04.000]  Are my windows tinted? Anything and everything that throws doubt on his ability to make the assertion he's making.
[01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  Okay.
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:14.000]  Okay. Did you just get through eating jalapeno peppers for lunch? Were your eyes watering?
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:21.000]  Did you just go to the porta potty on the corner and the stitch was so bad you couldn't get your eyes to clear?
[01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:24.000]  Come on. Tell me something.
[01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  Sounds good. Sounds good.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:32.000]  Okay. Feed him up. Make him black and blue and I don't need his uniform.
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  Sounds good, Eddie.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  All right, Anthony. Thanks for calling in. Good luck.
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:38.000]  Appreciate it. Thank you. You too. Bye-bye.
[01:58:38.000 --> 01:58:45.000]  All right, folks. This has been Rule of Law Radio. Thank you so much for listening and folks, I'm begging you again.
[01:58:45.000 --> 01:58:52.000]  These donations are needed. They are appreciated. Keep us running. Keep us in the fight.
[01:58:52.000 --> 01:58:59.000]  Help me get this court case accomplished all the way up to the federal level so we can solve this once and for all.
[01:58:59.000 --> 01:59:01.000]  God bless and good night.
[01:59:01.000 --> 01:59:19.000]  The Bible's for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:59:19.000 --> 01:59:31.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:31.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:52.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:52.000 --> 02:00:12.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.