ROL_2012-02-03_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:04.800]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[00:04.800 --> 00:11.120]  Claremont-Gumrie, a lawyer for Swedish prosecutors, argued Thursday Britain's Supreme Court risked
[00:11.120 --> 00:17.080]  jeopardizing extraditions to neighboring countries if it stops WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange
[00:17.080 --> 00:20.960]  being sent to Sweden for questioning over sex crimes.
[00:20.960 --> 00:26.040]  Assange's lawyer told the court his arrest warrant was invalid under English law on the
[00:26.040 --> 00:31.480]  grounds it was not issued by an impartial judicial authority, but by a public prosecutor
[00:31.480 --> 00:33.880]  in Stockholm.
[00:33.880 --> 00:38.760]  Josh Fox, director of the Oscar-nominated documentary Gasland, blasted the House Science
[00:38.760 --> 00:42.880]  Committee Thursday after being arrested for trying to film a hearing.
[00:42.880 --> 00:48.000]  Fox had tried to record a subcommittee hearing regarding groundwater contamination in Wyoming
[00:48.000 --> 00:49.760]  caused by fracking.
[00:49.760 --> 00:54.520]  Fox said, I was arrested because oil and gas exerts influence on Congress, and that
[00:54.520 --> 00:57.720]  is not democracy.
[00:57.720 --> 01:02.840]  In spite of deep cuts and rising tuition, U.S. University investment portfolios grew
[01:02.840 --> 01:07.000]  last year, posting an average 19% return.
[01:07.000 --> 01:13.080]  The wealthiest, including Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, with endowments over $1 billion,
[01:13.080 --> 01:15.080]  average 20.1%.
[01:15.080 --> 01:20.200]  The smallest, with under $25 million, average 17.6%.
[01:20.200 --> 01:28.720]  The average tuition increase in 2010 and 2011 was 4.5% at private colleges and 7.9% at public
[01:28.720 --> 01:32.000]  universities.
[01:32.000 --> 01:37.040]  Multinational agricultural biotech firm Monsanto announced Friday's closing its wheat production
[01:37.040 --> 01:43.760]  operation in the U.K., following a Frankenstein foods campaign by the U.K. Daily Mail.
[01:43.760 --> 01:48.600]  The paper reported the company also plans to sell its genetically modified crop breeding
[01:48.600 --> 01:52.000]  centers in France, Germany, and the Czech Republic.
[01:52.000 --> 01:56.560]  The U.K. government was on the verge of announcing a finding that genetically engineered crops
[01:56.560 --> 01:59.960]  would, quote, pollute the countryside for generations.
[01:59.960 --> 02:07.000]  Bayer Crop Science has also cancelled its planned GMO crop trials in the U.K.
[02:07.000 --> 02:12.920]  A new report from the Thomas B. Fordham Institute finds the science standards of most American
[02:12.920 --> 02:17.480]  public schools, quote, remain mediocre too awful.
[02:17.480 --> 02:21.080]  Germany, California, and Washington, D.C. earned straight A's.
[02:21.080 --> 02:25.920]  Oregon, Idaho, Montana, and Nebraska scored F's.
[02:25.920 --> 02:31.080]  Researchers cited the undermining of evolution as a key factor in states' low grades.
[02:31.080 --> 02:36.680]  The report points out eight anti-evolution bills were introduced in six state legislatures
[02:36.680 --> 02:38.600]  last year.
[02:38.600 --> 02:42.680]  Researchers warned tactics for undermining evolution were becoming more subtle.
[02:42.680 --> 02:49.760]  Missouri has asterisked all, quote, controversial evolution content and relegated it to a voluntary
[02:49.760 --> 02:50.760]  curriculum.
[02:50.760 --> 02:55.160]  Tennessee includes evolution only in an elective high school course.
[02:55.160 --> 03:02.160]  For more details on this story, visit INN World Report.net.
[03:02.160 --> 03:24.160]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[03:24.160 --> 03:38.200]  That was great.
[03:38.200 --> 03:42.200]  I accepted it for value right away.
[03:42.200 --> 03:44.200]  It's time to do it.
[03:44.200 --> 03:46.200]  Not later.
[03:46.200 --> 03:48.200]  We are ranging later.
[03:48.200 --> 03:52.200]  And the time seems to get straighter today.
[03:52.200 --> 03:54.200]  Debra's here.
[03:54.200 --> 03:58.200]  I mentioned something about her somewhat,
[03:58.200 --> 04:00.200]  annoying me.
[04:00.200 --> 04:02.200]  I'm sure she didn't take that person a little bit.
[04:02.200 --> 04:04.200]  Lucy here.
[04:04.200 --> 04:07.200]  And she wanted to make a comment about Max.
[04:07.200 --> 04:09.200]  Hey, guys.
[04:09.200 --> 04:11.200]  I was listening to the car on the way home.
[04:11.200 --> 04:15.200]  And, yeah, I just wanted to say to Mark,
[04:15.200 --> 04:17.200]  thank you very much for the compliment on the audio.
[04:17.200 --> 04:20.200]  And I wanted to say, guess what, guys?
[04:20.200 --> 04:23.200]  I do everything on the PC, all of it.
[04:23.200 --> 04:25.200]  And it all is based on Windows.
[04:25.200 --> 04:28.200]  Now, I don't have any special peculiarity for Windows.
[04:28.200 --> 04:30.200]  I'd rather run everything on Linux.
[04:30.200 --> 04:34.200]  But the software that I use is, it will only run on Windows.
[04:34.200 --> 04:36.200]  But I run everything.
[04:36.200 --> 04:38.200]  All my computers for the network,
[04:38.200 --> 04:41.200]  they all run the Windows XP Pro platform.
[04:41.200 --> 04:43.200]  I've never had a problem with them.
[04:43.200 --> 04:45.200]  None of them have ever crashed.
[04:45.200 --> 04:48.200]  Everything is configured and tweaked out to the Max.
[04:48.200 --> 04:51.200]  And I do not like Macintosh computers
[04:51.200 --> 04:54.200]  because you can't configure the operating system.
[04:54.200 --> 04:56.200]  You can't configure the BIOS.
[04:56.200 --> 04:59.200]  You can't replace any hardware components.
[04:59.200 --> 05:02.200]  They're just all locked up tight.
[05:02.200 --> 05:06.200]  And if something goes wrong, you just almost can't fix it.
[05:06.200 --> 05:10.200]  And I'll tell you, I have used PCs for all computers
[05:10.200 --> 05:12.200]  in my audio recording studio.
[05:12.200 --> 05:14.200]  And when I build studios for other people,
[05:14.200 --> 05:16.200]  because I freelance work for that,
[05:16.200 --> 05:18.200]  I'll custom design studios for people
[05:18.200 --> 05:20.200]  and build computers for them.
[05:20.200 --> 05:25.200]  I always set up XP and set them up with Logic and Soundforge
[05:25.200 --> 05:26.200]  and things like that.
[05:26.200 --> 05:28.200]  And I've never had a problem.
[05:28.200 --> 05:29.200]  I've never had any of them crash.
[05:29.200 --> 05:30.200]  They run all the time.
[05:30.200 --> 05:31.200]  I never turn them off.
[05:31.200 --> 05:35.200]  I've had one computer crash for the network
[05:35.200 --> 05:37.200]  about a year and a half ago.
[05:37.200 --> 05:39.200]  And, again, it was, I believe,
[05:39.200 --> 05:41.200]  because of a lightning issue, like Eddie said.
[05:41.200 --> 05:43.200]  I mean, it was a very old computer.
[05:43.200 --> 05:46.200]  And the motherboard looked like it was probably about to go anyway
[05:46.200 --> 05:49.200]  because the capacitors were getting kind of bulging, you know?
[05:49.200 --> 05:52.200]  But there was a storm and the power went out
[05:52.200 --> 05:54.200]  and it didn't work after that.
[05:54.200 --> 05:56.200]  And I do have surge protectors and all that kind of good stuff.
[05:56.200 --> 06:00.200]  But, yeah, I mean, I've worked with people before
[06:00.200 --> 06:02.200]  in audio recording situations.
[06:02.200 --> 06:05.200]  A good friend of mine who has a studio, has a Mac.
[06:05.200 --> 06:08.200]  I've worked with him, known him for years and years and years.
[06:08.200 --> 06:10.200]  Every time I go over to the guy's studio,
[06:10.200 --> 06:14.200]  he's reinstalling the OS and reinstalling all the drivers.
[06:14.200 --> 06:16.200]  Every single time I see him, I'm like,
[06:16.200 --> 06:17.200]  dude, what is your problem?
[06:17.200 --> 06:19.200]  He's like, well, you know, I tell him,
[06:19.200 --> 06:20.200]  why don't you get a PC?
[06:20.200 --> 06:22.200]  Why don't you let me build a computer for you?
[06:22.200 --> 06:23.200]  You see my studio?
[06:23.200 --> 06:24.200]  Nothing ever goes wrong.
[06:24.200 --> 06:25.200]  I run XP.
[06:25.200 --> 06:27.200]  I got everything set up perfectly.
[06:27.200 --> 06:28.200]  I got everything configured.
[06:28.200 --> 06:31.200]  He's like, no, man, PCs are lame.
[06:31.200 --> 06:32.200]  I've got to have a Mac.
[06:32.200 --> 06:33.200]  And I'm like, well, we'll see.
[06:33.200 --> 06:35.200]  We see how lame it is because you're the one
[06:35.200 --> 06:37.200]  that his computer is always crashing
[06:37.200 --> 06:39.200]  and you're always having to reinstall the OS, not me.
[06:39.200 --> 06:43.200]  So anyway, I just wanted to let Mark know
[06:43.200 --> 06:45.200]  that Macs are not all that.
[06:45.200 --> 06:48.200]  And I've been working with the system for years.
[06:48.200 --> 06:51.200]  Oh, they are all that, but garbage usually is.
[06:51.200 --> 06:52.200]  Garbage.
[06:52.200 --> 06:53.200]  Yeah.
[06:53.200 --> 06:57.200]  That Mark is just an Apple snob.
[06:57.200 --> 07:00.200]  Well, you know, anyways, that's my story.
[07:00.200 --> 07:01.200]  That's my take on it.
[07:01.200 --> 07:02.200]  I'm sticking to it.
[07:02.200 --> 07:04.200]  I'm sticking with what I got.
[07:04.200 --> 07:06.200]  And Eddie's even saying, you know,
[07:06.200 --> 07:08.200]  he's been a computer repair person for years and years.
[07:08.200 --> 07:11.200]  That was a business he had before he got into, you know,
[07:11.200 --> 07:14.200]  teaching traffic seminars and stuff like that.
[07:14.200 --> 07:17.200]  I've worked at computer repair shops for years and years.
[07:17.200 --> 07:20.200]  And Eddie corroborates with me.
[07:20.200 --> 07:23.200]  It has the most trouble trying to repair Mac computers
[07:23.200 --> 07:24.200]  than anything else.
[07:24.200 --> 07:27.200]  So I don't really think that they're all that great.
[07:27.200 --> 07:29.200]  But anyways, that's all I had to say.
[07:29.200 --> 07:30.200]  And thanks for the compliments.
[07:30.200 --> 07:34.200]  And I do work very hard to put out the highest quality audio
[07:34.200 --> 07:36.200]  production possible.
[07:36.200 --> 07:39.200]  So thank you very much, guys.
[07:39.200 --> 07:42.200]  And Jerry is sending me a Skype chat saying we just took a bite
[07:42.200 --> 07:46.200]  out of his Apple.
[07:46.200 --> 07:47.200]  All right, I'll let y'all go.
[07:47.200 --> 07:48.200]  I'll let y'all get to the callers.
[07:48.200 --> 07:49.200]  Okay.
[07:49.200 --> 07:50.200]  Thank you.
[07:50.200 --> 07:51.200]  Thanks.
[07:51.200 --> 07:55.200]  Now we're going to go to Douglas.
[07:55.200 --> 07:57.200]  Is Douglas next?
[07:57.200 --> 08:00.200]  We were talking to Douglas last, right?
[08:00.200 --> 08:06.200]  He was stopped on questionable charges.
[08:06.200 --> 08:12.200]  And even though he showed the prescription to the
[08:12.200 --> 08:18.200]  highway patrolman for both, you know, for his medications,
[08:18.200 --> 08:27.200]  the patrolman took him immediately to jail in Brown County.
[08:27.200 --> 08:30.200]  Brownwood is the county seat for that.
[08:30.200 --> 08:40.200]  And he was in jail for a long time without any medication.
[08:40.200 --> 08:44.200]  He was able to post a bond, I think, of $35,000.
[08:44.200 --> 08:49.200]  Went back to California and he was supposed to have some hearing
[08:49.200 --> 08:51.200]  again back in Texas.
[08:51.200 --> 08:53.200]  He wasn't able to come back.
[08:53.200 --> 08:59.200]  And so then the Brown County authorities asked the people in
[08:59.200 --> 09:03.200]  California to extradite him.
[09:03.200 --> 09:09.200]  They arrested him, held him there, and then they sent him back
[09:09.200 --> 09:16.200]  to the Brown County where he keeps asking for medication.
[09:16.200 --> 09:19.200]  They will not give him any medication whatsoever.
[09:19.200 --> 09:24.200]  His father who set up a website here in Texas said three or four
[09:24.200 --> 09:31.200]  days before the Sunday show that he was weak that he could not
[09:31.200 --> 09:34.200]  even raise his head.
[09:34.200 --> 09:41.200]  So, okay, give me his, email me his name and where he's at.
[09:41.200 --> 09:42.200]  Okay.
[09:42.200 --> 09:46.200]  Now there are two sources for the information you need to go to
[09:46.200 --> 09:47.200]  immediately.
[09:47.200 --> 09:49.200]  His name is Chris.
[09:49.200 --> 09:50.200]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[09:50.200 --> 09:51.200]  Not on the air.
[09:51.200 --> 09:53.200]  Email it to me.
[09:53.200 --> 09:55.200]  I don't have access to email.
[09:55.200 --> 09:56.200]  Pardon me?
[09:56.200 --> 09:59.200]  I don't have access to email.
[09:59.200 --> 10:01.200]  Just go to a coffee shop or something.
[10:01.200 --> 10:05.200]  Or call me off the air.
[10:05.200 --> 10:10.200]  I don't want to reveal his name on the air unless he agreed to it.
[10:10.200 --> 10:15.200]  They gave his name on the Gary Johnson's program, Live and Let
[10:15.200 --> 10:16.200]  Live Sunday.
[10:16.200 --> 10:17.200]  Oh, okay.
[10:17.200 --> 10:19.200]  In that case, okay.
[10:19.200 --> 10:22.200]  And I'm saying that these are the two sources of information
[10:22.200 --> 10:24.200]  that you can go to.
[10:24.200 --> 10:30.200]  One is the second hour of Gary Johnson's program Live and Let
[10:30.200 --> 10:35.200]  Live that you carry on the Lagos network.
[10:35.200 --> 10:40.200]  And that was the second hour.
[10:40.200 --> 10:41.200]  Okay.
[10:41.200 --> 10:43.200]  I'll talk to Jerry about it and get the information.
[10:43.200 --> 10:44.200]  Okay.
[10:44.200 --> 10:52.200]  And then the website that his mother is set up, freechristias.com.
[10:52.200 --> 10:53.200]  Okay.
[10:53.200 --> 10:54.200]  One thing, okay.
[10:54.200 --> 10:55.200]  I'm sorry.
[10:55.200 --> 10:56.200]  Freechristias.com.
[10:56.200 --> 11:00.200]  Freechristias.com.
[11:00.200 --> 11:01.200]  Okay.
[11:01.200 --> 11:03.200]  Freechristias.com.
[11:03.200 --> 11:09.200]  One thing he needs to look at is Department of Public Safety
[11:09.200 --> 11:12.200]  Officers are traffic cops.
[11:12.200 --> 11:17.200]  They have no authority to enforce criminal laws.
[11:17.200 --> 11:22.200]  Well, also, there was an issue of profiling because he's Hispanic
[11:22.200 --> 11:25.200]  and he has long hair.
[11:25.200 --> 11:28.200]  Well, no wonder they threw him in jail.
[11:28.200 --> 11:39.200]  It was stated that on the Gary Johnson program that it was
[11:39.200 --> 11:43.200]  acknowledged that he had profiled it.
[11:43.200 --> 11:46.200]  As I said, I have no knowledge about it.
[11:46.200 --> 11:47.200]  Okay.
[11:47.200 --> 11:52.200]  That may be an issue, but it won't help him.
[11:52.200 --> 11:55.200]  There are some things that may help him.
[11:55.200 --> 11:59.200]  One of them is you bring a question they don't want to have to
[11:59.200 --> 12:00.200]  answer.
[12:00.200 --> 12:04.200]  And one of them is the restriction on Department of Public Safety
[12:04.200 --> 12:08.200]  Officers enforcing the criminal laws, except at the request of
[12:08.200 --> 12:12.200]  and in support of local law enforcement.
[12:12.200 --> 12:16.200]  Here was a direct enforcement of criminal laws that's beyond
[12:16.200 --> 12:17.200]  their authority.
[12:17.200 --> 12:23.200]  And he might want to look at somebody filing an action against
[12:23.200 --> 12:24.200]  them.
[12:24.200 --> 12:29.200]  But I'll find out where he's at and call down to the jail.
[12:29.200 --> 12:30.200]  All right.
[12:30.200 --> 12:31.200]  I sure do appreciate that.
[12:31.200 --> 12:35.200]  And if Eddie would do that too, if both of you would look into
[12:35.200 --> 12:38.200]  that and then go from there.
[12:38.200 --> 12:39.200]  Okay.
[12:39.200 --> 12:44.200]  It appears to be a matter of literally life and death.
[12:44.200 --> 12:47.200]  Okay. I will make a call and kind of light him up.
[12:47.200 --> 12:50.200]  I've had good luck with doing that.
[12:50.200 --> 12:51.200]  Okay.
[12:51.200 --> 12:54.200]  And then we'll edit, look into this too.
[12:54.200 --> 12:56.200]  I'll see what I can do.
[12:56.200 --> 12:57.200]  Okay.
[12:57.200 --> 12:58.200]  I sure do appreciate this.
[12:58.200 --> 13:00.200]  And as I said, I don't have any personal knowledge of this.
[13:00.200 --> 13:07.200]  But if, you know, the facts as stated are accurate, then, you
[13:07.200 --> 13:11.200]  know, we really need to, you know, do what we can.
[13:11.200 --> 13:14.200]  And I sure do appreciate this and I'll keep listening.
[13:14.200 --> 13:15.200]  Okay.
[13:15.200 --> 13:16.200]  Thank you.
[13:16.200 --> 13:17.200]  Thank you.
[13:17.200 --> 13:18.200]  Okay.
[13:18.200 --> 13:21.200]  Now we're going to go to Jeff in California.
[13:21.200 --> 13:24.200]  Jeff, what do you have for us?
[13:24.200 --> 13:26.200]  Randy, Eddie, how are you this evening?
[13:26.200 --> 13:27.200]  Great.
[13:27.200 --> 13:28.200]  Good.
[13:28.200 --> 13:29.200]  Thanks.
[13:29.200 --> 13:30.200]  Good.
[13:30.200 --> 13:33.200]  Actually, this is Jeff in New Mexico who's in California for a
[13:33.200 --> 13:34.200]  little bit of a lengthy time.
[13:34.200 --> 13:38.200]  I'm just trying to do my homework and get ready to the problems
[13:38.200 --> 13:39.200]  occur.
[13:39.200 --> 13:42.200]  And as a caveat here, I'm going to disagree with Deborah a little
[13:42.200 --> 13:43.200]  bit.
[13:43.200 --> 13:46.200]  And you guys, I don't really care about the sound on this network.
[13:46.200 --> 13:48.200]  It doesn't matter if the sound's any good.
[13:48.200 --> 13:52.200]  If the information is garbage and you guys are giving information
[13:52.200 --> 13:55.200]  that every American needs to hear and needs to know.
[13:55.200 --> 13:59.200]  And about those days, you guys think you wonder what you're
[13:59.200 --> 14:01.200]  doing, makes a difference.
[14:01.200 --> 14:02.200]  Don't wonder.
[14:02.200 --> 14:05.200]  You're not saying the sound is crappy.
[14:05.200 --> 14:07.200]  You just said, that's not an issue.
[14:07.200 --> 14:11.200]  No, I'm saying that there's some great sound out there on some
[14:11.200 --> 14:14.200]  really crappy things on the radio.
[14:14.200 --> 14:19.200]  The sound is secondary to a lot of people, although I'm glad we're
[14:19.200 --> 14:20.200]  there.
[14:20.200 --> 14:24.200]  Well, it's important.
[14:24.200 --> 14:30.200]  Deborah has really struggled to get really good sound.
[14:30.200 --> 14:32.200]  And she's done a great job.
[14:32.200 --> 14:34.200]  And it was really nice to hear it work.
[14:34.200 --> 14:37.200]  I wouldn't say that I've struggled.
[14:37.200 --> 14:39.200]  I wouldn't say that I've struggled.
[14:39.200 --> 14:41.200]  I've said that I've worked very hard.
[14:41.200 --> 14:44.200]  But I will also say this.
[14:44.200 --> 14:49.200]  The only reason most of the people listening or even hearing this
[14:49.200 --> 14:54.200]  message at all is because I have worked so hard to get the top
[14:54.200 --> 14:56.200]  notch audio quality.
[14:56.200 --> 14:58.200]  Because that's the only way you're going to get on AM and FM
[14:58.200 --> 14:59.200]  stations.
[14:59.200 --> 15:01.200]  Otherwise, it's strictly internet.
[15:01.200 --> 15:02.200]  It's strictly a conference call.
[15:02.200 --> 15:05.200]  And so the sound is very important.
[15:05.200 --> 15:07.200]  There are hundreds of thousands of people listening right now
[15:07.200 --> 15:11.200]  that would not hear this message if I didn't put out professional
[15:11.200 --> 15:13.200]  top notch quality sound.
[15:13.200 --> 15:15.200]  He's not knocking the sound.
[15:15.200 --> 15:16.200]  I know that.
[15:16.200 --> 15:21.200]  He's trying to say it's not as important as the message.
[15:21.200 --> 15:24.200]  And I'm saying, no, it is as important as the message.
[15:24.200 --> 15:27.200]  Because you wouldn't be hearing the message or the people that
[15:27.200 --> 15:30.200]  are listening on AM and FM right now would not be getting this
[15:30.200 --> 15:34.200]  information at all if the production quality wasn't top notch.
[15:34.200 --> 15:36.200]  But I appreciate that.
[15:36.200 --> 15:39.200]  Deborah, I really did want to take a claim on that.
[15:39.200 --> 15:41.200]  I'm not taking a position on that.
[15:41.200 --> 15:46.200]  It was more a tongue-in-cheek way to, and sort of between the lines
[15:46.200 --> 15:49.200]  way to say that the work that you do for the people who listen all
[15:49.200 --> 15:53.200]  the time and have listened since going back to WTPRN and all,
[15:53.200 --> 15:56.200]  the work you do, the work you guys do, shows between the lines
[15:56.200 --> 15:59.200]  and no one's up there really ever saying it.
[15:59.200 --> 16:04.200]  I just want you to know it shows, and the product is what it is,
[16:04.200 --> 16:06.200]  and it's the most valuable thing around.
[16:06.200 --> 16:08.200]  Well, I appreciate it.
[16:08.200 --> 16:12.200]  Well, I get terrified sometimes when, every once in a while,
[16:12.200 --> 16:16.200]  when you wonder out loud if you're making a difference,
[16:16.200 --> 16:18.200]  and you just have to know that you are.
[16:18.200 --> 16:20.200]  Thank you so much.
[16:20.200 --> 16:22.200]  Thank you.
[16:22.200 --> 16:23.200]  Let me get on to it.
[16:23.200 --> 16:25.200]  Thank you very much.
[16:25.200 --> 16:28.200]  You're talking.
[16:28.200 --> 16:29.200]  Go ahead.
[16:29.200 --> 16:31.200]  That's all right.
[16:31.200 --> 16:35.200]  I had called because, Eddie, when I was listening,
[16:35.200 --> 16:37.200]  it was traffic jams.
[16:37.200 --> 16:38.200]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[16:38.200 --> 16:39.200]  Hang on just a second.
[16:39.200 --> 16:41.200]  We do have a break we're about to go to,
[16:41.200 --> 16:42.200]  so hold on just a second.
[16:42.200 --> 16:44.200]  We'll pick you up on the other side, okay?
[16:44.200 --> 16:45.200]  Yes, sir.
[16:45.200 --> 16:46.200]  All right, folks.
[16:46.200 --> 16:47.200]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[16:47.200 --> 16:49.200]  We are on our four-hour info marathon.
[16:49.200 --> 16:53.200]  Call it numbers 512-646-1984.
[16:53.200 --> 16:54.200]  Get in line.
[16:54.200 --> 17:01.200]  We got a ways to go.
[17:24.200 --> 17:27.200]  For Obamacare, three men, one vision,
[17:27.200 --> 17:32.200]  more big government, more mandates, less freedom.
[17:32.200 --> 17:37.200]  One man stands apart, ready to deliver real change,
[17:37.200 --> 17:39.200]  voting against every tax increase
[17:39.200 --> 17:42.200]  and every unbalanced budget every time.
[17:42.200 --> 17:45.200]  A real plan to cut a trillion dollars year one
[17:45.200 --> 17:48.200]  and to balance the budget in three.
[17:48.200 --> 17:50.200]  Pro life, pro right to work,
[17:50.200 --> 17:54.200]  guiding by faith and principle, Ron Paul,
[17:54.200 --> 17:57.200]  the one who will restore America now.
[17:57.200 --> 18:00.200]  I'm Ron Paul, and I approve this message.
[18:00.200 --> 18:02.200]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors
[18:02.200 --> 18:05.200]  with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.200 --> 18:09.200]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Maris Proven Method.
[18:09.200 --> 18:11.200]  Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court
[18:11.200 --> 18:14.200]  against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:14.200 --> 18:16.200]  You'll get step-by-step instructions
[18:16.200 --> 18:18.200]  in plain English on how to win in court
[18:18.200 --> 18:20.200]  using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:20.200 --> 18:24.200]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons.
[18:24.200 --> 18:26.200]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:26.200 --> 18:29.200]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:29.200 --> 18:31.200]  How to turn the financial tables on them
[18:31.200 --> 18:33.200]  and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.200 --> 18:35.200]  The Michael Maris Proven Method
[18:35.200 --> 18:38.200]  is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.200 --> 18:41.200]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.200 --> 18:44.200]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[18:44.200 --> 18:46.200]  and click on the blue Michael Maris banner
[18:46.200 --> 18:49.200]  or email Michael Maris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.200 --> 18:51.200]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[18:51.200 --> 18:57.200]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[18:57.200 --> 19:00.200]  to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:01.200 --> 19:04.200]  Well, don't let nothing get to you
[19:04.200 --> 19:07.200]  only the father can do it for you.
[19:07.200 --> 19:10.200]  And don't let my mind people hurt you
[19:10.200 --> 19:13.200]  until things don't get behind you.
[19:13.200 --> 19:18.200]  Norman, my friend, and all our judges.
[19:38.200 --> 19:40.200]  Alright folks, we are back.
[19:40.200 --> 19:42.200]  This is rule of law radio.
[19:42.200 --> 19:45.200]  Now we are talking to Jeff in California.
[19:45.200 --> 19:46.200]  Jeff, please continue.
[19:46.200 --> 19:48.200]  Hi, Eddie, thanks so much.
[19:48.200 --> 19:52.200]  When I started going through traffic material,
[19:52.200 --> 19:55.200]  I was still left at myself
[19:55.200 --> 19:57.200]  because you don't get too far into this
[19:57.200 --> 20:00.200]  without understanding, as you all have said,
[20:00.200 --> 20:02.200]  that you've got to be chasing definitions
[20:02.200 --> 20:04.200]  and rabbit trails as your foundation
[20:04.200 --> 20:06.200]  before you're really doing a whole lot more.
[20:06.200 --> 20:08.200]  And I've got to say, for years,
[20:08.200 --> 20:11.200]  I couldn't figure out individual.
[20:11.200 --> 20:14.200]  The meaning of that until you went through that on the track.
[20:14.200 --> 20:16.200]  And I was so mad at that
[20:16.200 --> 20:19.200]  because they just pulled the wool over my eyes
[20:19.200 --> 20:21.200]  and it was sitting there right in front of me.
[20:21.200 --> 20:23.200]  So I thank you for that.
[20:23.200 --> 20:25.200]  Well, you're welcome.
[20:25.200 --> 20:28.200]  And yeah, that's one of the things they do,
[20:28.200 --> 20:31.200]  most assuredly, is they try to confuse us
[20:31.200 --> 20:34.200]  by using words we're familiar with
[20:34.200 --> 20:38.200]  and think we understand to create the illusion
[20:38.200 --> 20:41.200]  that we're operating in something known to us,
[20:41.200 --> 20:43.200]  and we aren't.
[20:43.200 --> 20:45.200]  Absolutely.
[20:45.200 --> 20:48.200]  My question then goes to the next part of that.
[20:48.200 --> 20:50.200]  You had talked on the tapes
[20:50.200 --> 20:52.200]  and it would be a natural progression
[20:52.200 --> 20:54.200]  when you were talking about person,
[20:54.200 --> 20:55.200]  definition of term person.
[20:55.200 --> 20:57.200]  I was looking at California law out here
[20:57.200 --> 21:00.200]  trying to get things squared away out here.
[21:00.200 --> 21:04.200]  I have it all done for New Mexico already.
[21:04.200 --> 21:07.200]  On the tapes, you had referenced a case
[21:07.200 --> 21:09.200]  that you couldn't remember.
[21:09.200 --> 21:11.200]  I think it was a SCOTUS case
[21:11.200 --> 21:14.200]  that you thought it was that went to
[21:14.200 --> 21:18.200]  a person never being a
[21:18.200 --> 21:20.200]  quote-unquote natural person,
[21:20.200 --> 21:22.200]  never being an individual human being.
[21:22.200 --> 21:25.200]  Well, a natural person is an oxymoron.
[21:25.200 --> 21:27.200]  Yes.
[21:27.200 --> 21:29.200]  But if you want to take it into context,
[21:29.200 --> 21:31.200]  this is the way that I've theorized
[21:31.200 --> 21:33.200]  that this can actually function.
[21:33.200 --> 21:35.200]  A natural person,
[21:35.200 --> 21:37.200]  no matter what you're talking about,
[21:37.200 --> 21:41.200]  person actually means capacity, okay?
[21:41.200 --> 21:44.200]  It doesn't mean the physical being.
[21:44.200 --> 21:47.200]  It means by what authority,
[21:47.200 --> 21:52.200]  what capacity is this individual acting?
[21:52.200 --> 21:54.200]  Yes.
[21:54.200 --> 21:56.200]  Now remember that the root definition
[21:56.200 --> 21:59.200]  of person is persona.
[21:59.200 --> 22:03.200]  Persona in the old version of the word
[22:03.200 --> 22:06.200]  means the actor's mask,
[22:06.200 --> 22:08.200]  the face of authority,
[22:08.200 --> 22:10.200]  or whatever act they're putting on
[22:10.200 --> 22:13.200]  to show you how they're behaving.
[22:13.200 --> 22:15.200]  A police officer is a person.
[22:15.200 --> 22:18.200]  A fireman is a person.
[22:18.200 --> 22:21.200]  But they're not natural persons.
[22:21.200 --> 22:23.200]  Mother, father, sister,
[22:23.200 --> 22:26.200]  brother, aunt, uncle, grandmother, grandfather.
[22:26.200 --> 22:29.200]  Those are natural persons.
[22:29.200 --> 22:31.200]  They're natural personas.
[22:31.200 --> 22:36.200]  They exist in nature by relation.
[22:36.200 --> 22:39.200]  So when they say a natural person,
[22:39.200 --> 22:42.200]  that's the closest thing to a natural person
[22:42.200 --> 22:45.200]  I can fathom them even coming up with.
[22:45.200 --> 22:49.200]  Because there's no such thing in the
[22:49.200 --> 22:53.200]  legal reality realm of these legal fictions
[22:53.200 --> 22:55.200]  that is natural.
[22:55.200 --> 22:57.200]  Nothing.
[22:57.200 --> 22:59.200]  The real difference here is that
[22:59.200 --> 23:02.200]  when we talk about person
[23:02.200 --> 23:04.200]  and the way they're using it,
[23:04.200 --> 23:08.200]  the only way that natural fits into it is
[23:08.200 --> 23:12.200]  when that capacity can only be animated
[23:12.200 --> 23:17.200]  by a living human being.
[23:17.200 --> 23:21.200]  A police officer is a capacity
[23:21.200 --> 23:23.200]  that only has function
[23:23.200 --> 23:25.200]  when a living man or woman
[23:25.200 --> 23:31.200]  steps into that persona to act under it.
[23:31.200 --> 23:34.200]  That's as close to natural as it's ever going to get.
[23:34.200 --> 23:38.200]  The capacity itself can only be operated
[23:38.200 --> 23:43.200]  and animated by a living human being.
[23:43.200 --> 23:46.200]  We're dealing in both New Mexico and California
[23:46.200 --> 23:51.200]  actually in motor vehicle and traffic law.
[23:51.200 --> 23:54.200]  We're dealing with something Texas doesn't deal with,
[23:54.200 --> 23:57.200]  which is natural law or natural person
[23:57.200 --> 24:00.200]  being part of important definitions.
[24:00.200 --> 24:04.200]  So I am looking at really trying to nail that one down.
[24:04.200 --> 24:06.200]  Well, that depends.
[24:06.200 --> 24:08.200]  Depending upon what code you're looking at,
[24:08.200 --> 24:10.200]  you may have to contend with natural person.
[24:10.200 --> 24:15.200]  The penal code does use the term natural person.
[24:15.200 --> 24:17.200]  But the penal code is also the only code
[24:17.200 --> 24:20.200]  that defines the term individual.
[24:20.200 --> 24:24.200]  And only in that code is individual defined
[24:24.200 --> 24:31.200]  as a human being that was born and is alive.
[24:31.200 --> 24:34.200]  But when you look at how they use it
[24:34.200 --> 24:36.200]  in the other codes,
[24:36.200 --> 24:39.200]  that cannot possibly be what the definition
[24:39.200 --> 24:42.200]  of individual is.
[24:42.200 --> 24:44.200]  It simply cannot be,
[24:44.200 --> 24:47.200]  just in the context in which it's used.
[24:47.200 --> 24:50.200]  That's why the study of individual in person
[24:50.200 --> 24:53.200]  are so important to the understanding
[24:53.200 --> 24:55.200]  of what they're doing in these statutes.
[24:55.200 --> 24:58.200]  They're almost foundational, almost fundamental.
[24:58.200 --> 25:00.200]  I don't think we run into that problem
[25:00.200 --> 25:04.200]  in these two codes I'm dealing with here tonight.
[25:04.200 --> 25:06.200]  Because in each case,
[25:06.200 --> 25:11.200]  they're part of the body of artificial entities
[25:11.200 --> 25:13.200]  that's included in that.
[25:13.200 --> 25:17.200]  Then it comes under maximum law, I think, and the like.
[25:17.200 --> 25:20.200]  But I was still trying to track down the case law
[25:20.200 --> 25:22.200]  that you couldn't know.
[25:22.200 --> 25:24.200]  This was a seminar you did in 2009.
[25:24.200 --> 25:26.200]  I don't expect you to remember that.
[25:26.200 --> 25:31.200]  But when I go in and try and find Supreme Court definition
[25:31.200 --> 25:35.200]  of person, I get that 5,000 hits.
[25:35.200 --> 25:38.200]  I haven't found a way to narrow that down.
[25:38.200 --> 25:42.200]  And I was hoping you might know what that case was.
[25:42.200 --> 25:46.200]  No, I do not have it right off the top of my head.
[25:46.200 --> 25:50.200]  But every case that I've got researched out of this
[25:50.200 --> 25:52.200]  is in the seminar material somewhere.
[25:52.200 --> 25:55.200]  I've either copied and pasted it into some document
[25:55.200 --> 25:59.200]  or I've managed to find and download the actual case.
[25:59.200 --> 26:03.200]  If you look under the resources folder,
[26:03.200 --> 26:06.200]  that'll be the first place where I've got a folder
[26:06.200 --> 26:08.200]  called case law.
[26:08.200 --> 26:12.200]  Under that, there is also a folder marked unsorted.
[26:12.200 --> 26:19.200]  Unsorted is by far the largest folder in all of that subregion,
[26:19.200 --> 26:24.200]  simply because I collected volumes of information
[26:24.200 --> 26:26.200]  studying this subject over the years.
[26:26.200 --> 26:29.200]  Did not agree with a vast majority of it,
[26:29.200 --> 26:35.200]  but it did point me in directions to come up with things
[26:35.200 --> 26:38.200]  that I might not have otherwise have found.
[26:38.200 --> 26:41.200]  And in that regard, it was invaluable,
[26:41.200 --> 26:47.200]  even if the information it cited directly was useless.
[26:47.200 --> 26:51.200]  That brings up an individual issue now.
[26:51.200 --> 26:53.200]  I'm reluctant to bring it up on radio
[26:53.200 --> 26:56.200]  because it doesn't apply to others, but I don't have any of that.
[26:56.200 --> 27:02.200]  I got my initial information from Deborah that she sends out
[27:02.200 --> 27:05.200]  when she gets payment and the like,
[27:05.200 --> 27:07.200]  and I've been on mail with you a couple times after that,
[27:07.200 --> 27:09.200]  but I know what you've been up against,
[27:09.200 --> 27:15.200]  so I'm not pressing that, but I don't have any of that other stuff.
[27:15.200 --> 27:17.200]  Were you only emailed the documents
[27:17.200 --> 27:19.200]  because you bought it that way
[27:19.200 --> 27:22.200]  or did you download anything from Deborah?
[27:22.200 --> 27:26.200]  She sent me a link, and I think it's what everyone uses.
[27:26.200 --> 27:28.200]  I downloaded that, and then she says,
[27:28.200 --> 27:33.200]  be sure you send Eddie an email for the updated, the latest,
[27:33.200 --> 27:35.200]  everything's different, remedies folder,
[27:35.200 --> 27:39.200]  all that has changed a lot, and I've never got that.
[27:39.200 --> 27:41.200]  I've been on mail with you a couple times,
[27:41.200 --> 27:43.200]  but I really am aware of what you're up against
[27:43.200 --> 27:45.200]  on time these days,
[27:45.200 --> 27:48.200]  and I know you've referenced changes that are being made,
[27:48.200 --> 27:50.200]  so I've not pressed it,
[27:50.200 --> 27:54.200]  but it would be nice to have all that too when it comes out.
[27:54.200 --> 27:59.200]  So I'm not really saying anything until an update comes,
[27:59.200 --> 28:01.200]  which gets me to my last point.
[28:01.200 --> 28:03.200]  On the last caller, you mentioned that
[28:03.200 --> 28:06.200]  we went through the computer crash deal there.
[28:06.200 --> 28:09.200]  Do you not have the update list now?
[28:09.200 --> 28:12.200]  No, no, no, the update list is in my email.
[28:12.200 --> 28:14.200]  That's completely different.
[28:14.200 --> 28:16.200]  Okay, okay, okay.
[28:16.200 --> 28:20.200]  So I don't need to burden your inbox and let you know this?
[28:20.200 --> 28:21.200]  No.
[28:21.200 --> 28:23.200]  Okay, terrific.
[28:23.200 --> 28:25.200]  I will look for those when they come in,
[28:25.200 --> 28:30.200]  and I am really looking forward to getting into those folders.
[28:30.200 --> 28:32.200]  Okay, well, now the problem is,
[28:32.200 --> 28:35.200]  is when it comes to the larger folders on this,
[28:35.200 --> 28:38.200]  there's no way to update those by email.
[28:38.200 --> 28:44.200]  All of the material right now is almost 52 gigabytes.
[28:44.200 --> 28:46.200]  Oh, and what am I missing?
[28:46.200 --> 28:49.200]  That's exactly why Deborah sends you links,
[28:49.200 --> 28:53.200]  she is the source for the download server
[28:53.200 --> 28:55.200]  that handles the large image files.
[28:55.200 --> 28:59.200]  I've got to get a new set of ISO image files to her
[28:59.200 --> 29:03.200]  so she can get those put up so that people can download them,
[29:03.200 --> 29:07.200]  but there's no way for me to email the remainder of the material.
[29:07.200 --> 29:10.200]  That's why the only thing we actually email
[29:10.200 --> 29:14.200]  is updates to the book and updates to the documents.
[29:14.200 --> 29:17.200]  I see, and that makes sense.
[29:17.200 --> 29:24.200]  Okay, well then, if I have the original 2009 information then,
[29:24.200 --> 29:27.200]  is that what I have then?
[29:27.200 --> 29:30.200]  Yeah, but there's been a lot of resources
[29:30.200 --> 29:33.200]  and research information added to it since then.
[29:33.200 --> 29:35.200]  That much I can tell you.
[29:35.200 --> 29:40.200]  The problem is, is the amount of time it takes to get the ISO image
[29:40.200 --> 29:45.200]  is created because I have to break them up into reasonable chunks
[29:45.200 --> 29:47.200]  so that people can download them.
[29:47.200 --> 29:53.200]  I've got to break 52 gigs into 100 to 150 meg bit files.
[29:53.200 --> 29:54.200]  You know what I'm saying?
[29:54.200 --> 29:56.200]  I totally understand.
[29:56.200 --> 29:58.200]  Okay, hang on just a second,
[29:58.200 --> 30:00.200]  we'll finish this up on the other side.
[30:00.200 --> 30:03.200]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper
[30:03.200 --> 30:05.200]  that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[30:05.200 --> 30:07.200]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:07.200 --> 30:10.200]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded
[30:10.200 --> 30:12.200]  it was a controlled demolition.
[30:12.200 --> 30:15.200]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives
[30:15.200 --> 30:18.200]  and thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[30:18.200 --> 30:19.200]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:19.200 --> 30:20.200]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:20.200 --> 30:22.200]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[30:22.200 --> 30:23.200]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:23.200 --> 30:24.200]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:24.200 --> 30:27.200]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[30:27.200 --> 30:30.200]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:33.200 --> 30:35.200]  Your voice says a lot about you and your moods,
[30:35.200 --> 30:37.200]  and now the government wants to use it
[30:37.200 --> 30:40.200]  to analyze whether you're angry, drunk, or lying.
[30:40.200 --> 30:43.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albright, and I'll be back in a moment
[30:43.200 --> 30:47.200]  to tell you about this latest form of electronic surveillance.
[30:47.200 --> 30:49.200]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:49.200 --> 30:51.200]  When you give up data about yourself,
[30:51.200 --> 30:52.200]  you'll never get it back again.
[30:52.200 --> 30:54.200]  And once your privacy is gone,
[30:54.200 --> 30:57.200]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:57.200 --> 30:59.200]  So protect your rights.
[30:59.200 --> 31:03.200]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[31:03.200 --> 31:05.200]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[31:05.200 --> 31:08.200]  This message is brought to you by startpage.com,
[31:08.200 --> 31:10.200]  the private search engine alternative
[31:10.200 --> 31:12.200]  to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[31:12.200 --> 31:15.200]  Start over with StartPage.
[31:15.200 --> 31:18.200]  Airports are starting to feel a bit like prisons
[31:18.200 --> 31:21.200]  with X-rays, pat-downs, and body scanners.
[31:21.200 --> 31:23.200]  But a new technology may soon,
[31:23.200 --> 31:26.200]  well, enhance our flying experience even further,
[31:26.200 --> 31:28.200]  voice analysis.
[31:28.200 --> 31:30.200]  Researchers are developing technology
[31:30.200 --> 31:32.200]  to analyze people's conversations.
[31:32.200 --> 31:35.200]  They're scanning for hundreds of local cues,
[31:35.200 --> 31:37.200]  like pitch, timing, and intensity,
[31:37.200 --> 31:40.200]  the change when people are upset or intoxicated.
[31:40.200 --> 31:42.200]  They can also tell whether a person is lying
[31:42.200 --> 31:45.200]  with about 70% accuracy.
[31:45.200 --> 31:47.200]  The U.S. Air Force is helping to pay for this
[31:47.200 --> 31:51.200]  with $1.5 million of our tax money.
[31:51.200 --> 31:53.200]  I wonder if they can analyze my voice
[31:53.200 --> 31:55.200]  to figure out how I feel about that.
[31:55.200 --> 31:58.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com,
[31:58.200 --> 32:08.200]  the world's most private search engine.
[32:29.200 --> 32:32.200]  Oh, I won't.
[32:32.200 --> 32:40.200]  I won't let you pull the wall over my eyes.
[32:40.200 --> 32:47.200]  They must refuse your news, also coming live.
[32:47.200 --> 32:50.200]  It seems you like to say,
[32:50.200 --> 32:55.200]  but please take some words to the wise.
[32:55.200 --> 33:21.200]  Please stop trying to pull the wall over my eyes.
[33:21.200 --> 33:25.200]  All right, folks, we are back at the rule of law radio.
[33:25.200 --> 33:29.200]  The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[33:29.200 --> 33:32.200]  We've got about an hour and a half left in the show.
[33:32.200 --> 33:34.200]  So if you've got any questions, query or ponder,
[33:34.200 --> 33:36.200]  give us a call.
[33:36.200 --> 33:39.200]  Right now we are finishing up with Jeff in California.
[33:39.200 --> 33:41.200]  Okay, Jeff, yeah.
[33:41.200 --> 33:44.200]  I've got to get the new ISO image files broken up
[33:44.200 --> 33:46.200]  into the individual files.
[33:46.200 --> 33:50.200]  And as you know, 52 gigs down to 100 to 150 megs.
[33:50.200 --> 33:53.200]  That's a lot of files.
[33:53.200 --> 33:57.200]  So what I've got to do is get all that done.
[33:57.200 --> 33:59.200]  Get those handed off to Deborah.
[33:59.200 --> 34:01.200]  She's got to get them uploaded to the server.
[34:01.200 --> 34:05.200]  That's the only way anybody is getting a full seminar update.
[34:05.200 --> 34:10.200]  Otherwise, the only thing going out by email is changes to the book
[34:10.200 --> 34:13.200]  and anything dealing with changes to the docs.
[34:13.200 --> 34:17.200]  Okay, I think I'm wondering if I might have done something wrong
[34:17.200 --> 34:20.200]  on the original off the download server,
[34:20.200 --> 34:25.200]  because I just looked on my computer, a PC,
[34:25.200 --> 34:31.200]  and I don't have a folder called Other with a whole bunch of things in it.
[34:31.200 --> 34:33.200]  No, not Other.
[34:33.200 --> 34:36.200]  You've got a folder called Remedies.
[34:36.200 --> 34:38.200]  You've got a folder called Research.
[34:38.200 --> 34:41.200]  You've got a folder called Resources.
[34:41.200 --> 34:46.200]  Research has a folder in it called Case Law.
[34:46.200 --> 34:51.200]  And it's got another folder in it called Unsorted.
[34:51.200 --> 34:55.200]  Oh, look, I don't have that.
[34:55.200 --> 35:00.200]  Okay, then odds are you did not download all of the files.
[35:00.200 --> 35:05.200]  Okay, so the files that are out there,
[35:05.200 --> 35:07.200]  they're made where they can extract.
[35:07.200 --> 35:10.200]  Generally, if you get certain ones,
[35:10.200 --> 35:13.200]  the entire folder structure is in all of them.
[35:13.200 --> 35:17.200]  But files themselves are only in the ones that go to that particular thing.
[35:17.200 --> 35:21.200]  I had to put the books and documents in one.
[35:21.200 --> 35:25.200]  I had to put research into another and break it up into much smaller files.
[35:25.200 --> 35:29.200]  I had to put resources into another and break it up into much smaller files,
[35:29.200 --> 35:31.200]  and so on and so forth.
[35:31.200 --> 35:37.200]  Okay, Eddie, that's an individual thing that I did or something.
[35:37.200 --> 35:41.200]  I'll get back with Deborah on that and try to resolve that.
[35:41.200 --> 35:43.200]  That doesn't need airtime.
[35:43.200 --> 35:49.200]  The original seminar was like two DVDs in one CD.
[35:49.200 --> 35:53.200]  There was not nearly as much information as there is in there now.
[35:53.200 --> 35:55.200]  Okay, okay.
[35:55.200 --> 35:57.200]  I think I understand a little bit better there.
[35:57.200 --> 35:59.200]  Listen, you guys are doing...
[35:59.200 --> 36:01.200]  I just don't have the words for it,
[36:01.200 --> 36:04.200]  and you just have to know that stands for a whole lot of people.
[36:04.200 --> 36:06.200]  There's only one person on the phone at a time,
[36:06.200 --> 36:09.200]  but there's a lot of people listening and a lot of people feel the same way.
[36:09.200 --> 36:12.200]  And it's not really a compliment.
[36:12.200 --> 36:13.200]  You have to know that.
[36:13.200 --> 36:14.200]  It's like mandatory.
[36:14.200 --> 36:17.200]  Otherwise, you won't have the fuel to continue.
[36:17.200 --> 36:20.200]  So please take this from an awful lot of people out here.
[36:20.200 --> 36:21.200]  Okay?
[36:21.200 --> 36:22.200]  Appreciate it.
[36:22.200 --> 36:23.200]  Thank you very much, Jeff.
[36:23.200 --> 36:24.200]  Okay, thank you all.
[36:24.200 --> 36:25.200]  We'll talk to you again soon.
[36:25.200 --> 36:26.200]  Thank you.
[36:26.200 --> 36:27.200]  Yes, sir.
[36:27.200 --> 36:28.200]  You have a good night.
[36:28.200 --> 36:31.200]  All right, now we're going to go to James in Maryland.
[36:31.200 --> 36:33.200]  James, what can we do for you?
[36:33.200 --> 36:35.200]  Greetings.
[36:35.200 --> 36:49.200]  We are going to ask you about grand jury actions in regard to judicial tyranny,
[36:49.200 --> 36:59.200]  and where a judge has threatened death, a litigant, a civil litigant,
[36:59.200 --> 37:07.200]  and they was going to call out the Navy, the Army, the Marines, and the Navy.
[37:07.200 --> 37:08.200]  Twice.
[37:08.200 --> 37:09.200]  Twice the Navy.
[37:09.200 --> 37:12.200]  The Navy is going to be busy.
[37:12.200 --> 37:23.200]  And they have essentially taken $100 million from a businessman and 100% of his assets
[37:23.200 --> 37:32.200]  and put it into a receivership by a friend of the judge who had, was first a special
[37:32.200 --> 37:38.200]  master and had previous to that, had a conflict of interest with the, you know, even being
[37:38.200 --> 37:45.200]  involved because he had been given, you know, attorney client confidentiality information
[37:45.200 --> 37:46.200]  years prior.
[37:46.200 --> 37:52.200]  So that's a nutshell description of some of the key points.
[37:52.200 --> 37:59.200]  This is, and we talked about this earlier today, and this is an issue that needs to go
[37:59.200 --> 38:04.200]  to a local grand jury, not a federal grand jury.
[38:04.200 --> 38:11.200]  And there is the axiom, take the state to the fed, the fed to the state.
[38:11.200 --> 38:15.200]  And go ahead.
[38:15.200 --> 38:17.200]  What's the axiom again?
[38:17.200 --> 38:22.200]  Take the state to the fed, the fed to the state.
[38:22.200 --> 38:27.200]  If you want to go after a federal agent, you want to go after him in the state.
[38:27.200 --> 38:32.200]  They're not going to have the sympathy for him that the federal courts will.
[38:32.200 --> 38:37.200]  And vice versa, if you want to go after a state agent, take him to the federal court.
[38:37.200 --> 38:50.200]  We have a federal judge sitting in a federal courthouse making rulings in a federal case.
[38:50.200 --> 38:59.200]  If the judge in the process of making those rulings pulls out a pistol and shoots someone,
[38:59.200 --> 39:02.200]  where would he be prosecuted?
[39:02.200 --> 39:04.200]  State or fed?
[39:04.200 --> 39:08.200]  Well, I presume you're right in the state court.
[39:08.200 --> 39:09.200]  The state.
[39:09.200 --> 39:12.200]  Remember the movie, The Presidio?
[39:12.200 --> 39:13.200]  It was with Sean Connery.
[39:13.200 --> 39:14.200]  He was a local sheriff.
[39:14.200 --> 39:19.200]  And there's a murder on the marine base, the Presidio.
[39:19.200 --> 39:27.200]  And he went in and investigated the murder, not the military or not the feds, because
[39:27.200 --> 39:30.200]  that was a state crime.
[39:30.200 --> 39:35.200]  Just because it was on property that was leased to the federal government didn't give the
[39:35.200 --> 39:38.200]  federal government subject matter jurisdiction.
[39:38.200 --> 39:46.200]  In the state of Texas, there are two properties that have been ceded to the federal government.
[39:46.200 --> 39:48.200]  They're both federal prisons.
[39:48.200 --> 39:52.200]  The federal courthouse has not been ceded to the federal government.
[39:52.200 --> 39:55.200]  It does not belong to the federal government.
[39:55.200 --> 39:59.200]  It belongs to the state.
[39:59.200 --> 40:08.200]  So the state still has subject matter jurisdiction on common law crimes or violations of Texas
[40:08.200 --> 40:10.200]  state penal laws.
[40:10.200 --> 40:15.200]  So if a judge, acting under the color of his authority, he exerts or purports to exert
[40:15.200 --> 40:18.200]  an authority he does not expressly have.
[40:18.200 --> 40:23.200]  And in the process, to organize a citizen for free access to a dormitory right, that's
[40:23.200 --> 40:27.200]  a state crime, not a federal crime.
[40:27.200 --> 40:29.200]  They can do a state grand jury.
[40:29.200 --> 40:34.200]  And I'd like to talk about it in terms of appeal.
[40:34.200 --> 40:37.200]  Appeal to the grand jury.
[40:37.200 --> 40:47.200]  We have other courts of appeal and not just the court of appeals, court of criminal appeals.
[40:47.200 --> 40:50.200]  We have the grand jury.
[40:50.200 --> 40:58.200]  And I would much rather appeal their behavior to a grand jury of my peers.
[40:58.200 --> 41:04.200]  Then I went to a court of his peers.
[41:04.200 --> 41:10.200]  I once had a head criminal district judge in Travis County, when I bushwhacked him in
[41:10.200 --> 41:15.200]  his courtroom with a set of criminal complaints against the district attorney, said I should
[41:15.200 --> 41:21.200]  take these to the sheriff, and I told him I did that, and he threw them in the trash.
[41:21.200 --> 41:26.200]  He said, well, you should appeal to the district court for a written mandamus.
[41:26.200 --> 41:30.200]  I said, uh, judge, don't ask me to appeal.
[41:30.200 --> 41:34.200]  You go before a corrupt judge, and he renders a bogus decision, and everybody says, oh,
[41:34.200 --> 41:36.200]  that's okay.
[41:36.200 --> 41:41.200]  You can go before a whole panel of corrupt judges, and they'll really screw you, Roy.
[41:41.200 --> 41:46.200]  The judge kind of laughed, and he said, well, Mr. Kelton, I don't think it's quite that bad.
[41:46.200 --> 41:49.200]  That's because you're not pro-say.
[41:49.200 --> 41:51.200]  I have a better idea.
[41:51.200 --> 41:53.200]  I'll appeal to the grand jury.
[41:53.200 --> 41:56.200]  And he said, well, Mr. Kelton, you can't appeal to the grand jury.
[41:56.200 --> 41:58.200]  He said, sure can.
[41:58.200 --> 42:04.200]  I can appeal to the grand jury to arrest the sheriff for felony shielding for prosecution
[42:04.200 --> 42:07.200]  and violation of 3805 appeal code.
[42:07.200 --> 42:12.200]  And he kind of leaned back in his chair and stared at me for a minute, and I know he's thinking,
[42:12.200 --> 42:17.200]  this guy's a scoundrel, and he was right.
[42:17.200 --> 42:20.200]  This is where we need to take it.
[42:20.200 --> 42:29.200]  And in talking earlier, I would suggest that you set up the prosecuting attorney.
[42:29.200 --> 42:38.200]  Don't go into him originally with your complaint against a federal judge.
[42:38.200 --> 42:41.200]  He is not going to want to take your complaint.
[42:41.200 --> 42:52.200]  First, find another person, maybe a federal prosecutor, or someone else involved with the federal system,
[42:52.200 --> 42:54.200]  that you can make...
[42:54.200 --> 42:56.200]  Do you want a receiver appointed by the judge?
[42:56.200 --> 42:58.200]  That would be good.
[42:58.200 --> 43:03.200]  If the receiver did anything, you can construe this criminal.
[43:03.200 --> 43:06.200]  And it's best if you can find something dead bank.
[43:06.200 --> 43:11.200]  Whether the receiver has a ministerial duty to perform a given act,
[43:11.200 --> 43:14.200]  that he fails to perform that act.
[43:14.200 --> 43:19.200]  Ministerial meaning he has no discretion.
[43:19.200 --> 43:23.200]  If he fails to perform a ministerial duty,
[43:23.200 --> 43:29.200]  and in the process denies you, or someone in the Fulton Free Access Tour enjoyment of the right,
[43:29.200 --> 43:35.200]  under 39.03 Texas penal code, that's a class A misdemeanor.
[43:35.200 --> 43:40.200]  So, okay, we'll go back to this when we come back on the other side.
[43:40.200 --> 43:44.200]  This is Randy Kelsen, David Stevens, over to Craig, we have our radio.
[43:44.200 --> 43:53.200]  We're calling number 512-646-1984, and these were finished with James, we're going to go back to Phil,
[43:53.200 --> 44:00.200]  and we're going to address some issues about conflict.
[44:00.200 --> 44:04.200]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.200 --> 44:14.200]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[44:14.200 --> 44:19.200]  step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.200 --> 44:23.200]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.200 --> 44:28.200]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.200 --> 44:34.200]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.200 --> 44:43.200]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.200 --> 44:52.200]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.200 --> 45:01.200]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.200 --> 45:05.200]  The Oklahoma City bombing, top ten reasons to question the official story,
[45:05.200 --> 45:09.200]  reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices.
[45:09.200 --> 45:17.200]  On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the writer Chuck report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators.
[45:17.200 --> 45:25.200]  The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone delivered the writer Chuck bomb to the Murra building and detonated it.
[45:25.200 --> 45:30.200]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley,
[45:30.200 --> 45:39.200]  who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing, testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fateful John Doe number two, exiting the writer truck.
[45:39.200 --> 45:51.200]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing, no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing,
[45:51.200 --> 45:57.200]  including when he rented the writer truck, and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:57.200 --> 46:15.200]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:15.200 --> 46:27.200]  Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh.
[46:27.200 --> 46:39.200]  Always I must be careful what I'm wishing for, when I'm hungry I'd like to know just what I'm wishing for, I ain't asking for much, I ain't not being a liar.
[46:39.200 --> 46:47.200]  All right. All right, folks, we are back. This is rule of law and radio. All right, Rainey, there was something else you wished to bring up here.
[46:47.200 --> 46:59.200]  So, we're talking about the grand jury. We want to go to the state grand jury on the federal official, but you don't want to go after that official first.
[46:59.200 --> 47:11.200]  First, you want to set up the prosecuting attorney so he's in a position to where he is compromised. You want to get to a grand jury with these issues.
[47:11.200 --> 47:20.200]  You don't want to be dancing around with the prosecuting attorney who has a lot of political motivations that have nothing to do with the law or justice.
[47:20.200 --> 47:27.200]  So, since he has political motivations, we have to make this political. In the end, everything is political.
[47:27.200 --> 47:37.200]  So, we want to find an accusation we can make against someone else.
[47:37.200 --> 47:49.200]  Give it to the prosecuting attorney and get him to refuse to act on it, but this accusation needs to be an accusation against a public official.
[47:49.200 --> 48:06.200]  Because we have a statute, Article 2.03, paragraph A, that strictly removes any prosecutorial discretion in the matter of a complaint against a public official.
[48:06.200 --> 48:15.200]  We give the prosecutor opportunity to exercise prosecutorial discretion in violation of that statute.
[48:15.200 --> 48:25.200]  And then we take a complaint against the prosecutor and send it to a district judge as a verified criminal affidavit.
[48:25.200 --> 48:37.200]  And in so doing, we invoke the magisterial duty of the judge and the judge will do like Bob Perkins did and give us some very sage and friendly advice.
[48:37.200 --> 48:56.200]  Oh, you should take this to the sheriff's department of some other such nonsense. If he does anything other than hold an examining trial or forward the complaints to the foreman of the grand jury, then we prepare a criminal charge against the judge.
[48:56.200 --> 49:09.200]  And that's the one we take to the grand jury. We send that to the grand jury, grand district restricted, to the foreman of the grand jury. You don't even have to know his name, just foreman of the grand jury.
[49:09.200 --> 49:20.200]  The prosecutor will get that and open it. And when he does, he will see that there are complaints against the district judge for not prosecuting the district attorney.
[49:20.200 --> 49:26.200]  And he is absolutely compromised. That's when he's going to know you set him up.
[49:26.200 --> 49:34.200]  Now you're trying to get the district judge and died it because the district judge wouldn't present him to a grand jury.
[49:34.200 --> 49:42.200]  Now how is he going to interfere with your access to the grand jury? He is absolutely disqualified.
[49:42.200 --> 49:54.200]  That's when he'll know you set him up. Now you come back with complaints against the one you want to go after. Now they'll know you mean business.
[49:54.200 --> 50:01.200]  Are you there, James? Can we get you back? Oops. Oops, there we go.
[50:01.200 --> 50:15.200]  Are you there, James? Yes, I am. We're having some, I guess, technical difficulties because I'm calling in on Skype and people are in the background being heard and it causes some complexity.
[50:15.200 --> 50:24.200]  And I apologize. It's no problem. Okay. Did you get that part?
[50:24.200 --> 50:32.200]  What you just said, no, because I was just coming back on, we were talking about setting up the prosecutor.
[50:32.200 --> 50:36.200]  Yes. I did not hear how you set up the prosecutor.
[50:36.200 --> 50:54.200]  Okay. But you take a complaint against someone else like the court appointed administrator and make a claim against him and the more nitpicking it is, the better.
[50:54.200 --> 51:07.200]  But you want something that's absolutely specific and dead bank, but really minor. And they're going to say, well, you know, it's really not that big a deal.
[51:07.200 --> 51:15.200]  You know, they don't say that when they see that your plates expired yesterday. They don't say it's not that big a deal.
[51:15.200 --> 51:24.200]  They write a citation. So you file a complaint against someone that the prosecutor is absolutely not going to want to prosecute.
[51:24.200 --> 51:40.200]  And you get the prosecutor to exercise his discretion, which article 2.03 paragraph a specifically takes away from him in the matter of a criminal accusation against the public official for violating law related to his office.
[51:40.200 --> 51:49.200]  And when he refuses to give it to the grand jury, then you file a criminal complaint with him with a local judge with a district judge.
[51:49.200 --> 51:52.200]  You do it all by mail. Don't let them see you.
[51:52.200 --> 51:58.200]  Finally, verified criminal affidavits with a male.
[51:58.200 --> 52:00.200]  Go ahead.
[52:00.200 --> 52:05.200]  Why do you do it by mail and not in person?
[52:05.200 --> 52:12.200]  Because if you go down there in person, anything you say, they will lie about it.
[52:12.200 --> 52:18.200]  They will do everything they can to generate a confrontation. And if they can't, they'll make something up.
[52:18.200 --> 52:24.200]  They're lying scoundrels. I think they have courses in test of life.
[52:24.200 --> 52:26.200]  Okay.
[52:26.200 --> 52:49.200]  If they can't see you, they can't deal with you. And if you get any kind of call from anybody or someone comes to try to talk to you and they say anything that you can in any way construe as threatening or intimidating you call 911 immediately.
[52:49.200 --> 52:56.200]  You can ask the police to come out and arrest them for tampering with a witness obstruction of justice.
[52:56.200 --> 53:00.200]  3605 3606 Texas being code.
[53:00.200 --> 53:04.200]  Those are felons in Texas.
[53:04.200 --> 53:12.200]  If the feds come out at all to talk to you, you're called 911.
[53:12.200 --> 53:20.200]  If they come out to take a criminal complaint against them for tampering with a witness, they have no jurisdiction.
[53:20.200 --> 53:27.200]  So what you want to do is let them know that you're setting them up.
[53:27.200 --> 53:34.200]  This is not your first radio and you're setting them up because you know how to deal with them.
[53:34.200 --> 53:44.200]  You deal with a district judge and he refuses to give it to the grand jury. Then you send a complaint against the district judge.
[53:44.200 --> 53:51.200]  The grand jury accusing him of official oppression for not pursuing the prosecution of the district attorney.
[53:51.200 --> 54:01.200]  Now everybody's compromised. Everybody is disqualified from acting in a case.
[54:01.200 --> 54:13.200]  You send the complaint back. Now you have them in a position to where the prosecuting attorney can't interfere with the complaint.
[54:13.200 --> 54:15.200]  He can't block it. He can't intercept it.
[54:15.200 --> 54:24.200]  He can't exercise any kind of jurisdiction over it because the complaint.
[54:24.200 --> 54:28.200]  That makes life a lot more interesting for them.
[54:28.200 --> 54:34.200]  Now, rather than you actually ever get this before a grand jury is not quite so important,
[54:34.200 --> 54:40.200]  but when you come back with criminal accusations against the federal judge,
[54:40.200 --> 54:48.200]  almost certainly what you're going to get is either FBI or Homeland Security.
[54:48.200 --> 54:56.200]  And when they show up, you're called 911 immediately because these guys are going to be packing.
[54:56.200 --> 55:05.200]  I don't know how you feel about it, but I take loaded weapons very seriously.
[55:05.200 --> 55:09.200]  I have spent my time on the sharp end of them.
[55:09.200 --> 55:14.200]  And when someone comes around prominently displaying a deadly weapon,
[55:14.200 --> 55:21.200]  I take that as fair notice that he is fully prepared to use that deadly weapon.
[55:21.200 --> 55:22.200]  Right.
[55:22.200 --> 55:27.200]  So when, you know, if I have a policeman lock on my door,
[55:27.200 --> 55:34.200]  I did this to the county sheriff through him off my porch and get your behind off my porch,
[55:34.200 --> 55:36.200]  get off my property.
[55:36.200 --> 55:41.200]  Well, I need to talk to you. You go put that gun in the car and you take that gun out of your boot,
[55:41.200 --> 55:45.200]  you put it in the car and you're welcome to come in here.
[55:45.200 --> 55:49.200]  Well, do you have any weapons in your house? Doesn't make any difference.
[55:49.200 --> 55:53.200]  If you're that afraid, get lost.
[55:53.200 --> 55:57.200]  You're not coming in my house with a loaded weapon.
[55:57.200 --> 56:01.200]  Then I had to hear the chief of police.
[56:01.200 --> 56:04.200]  And Tom, I told him, come on in.
[56:04.200 --> 56:07.200]  Well, he's got a gun on. Yeah, trust me.
[56:07.200 --> 56:10.200]  But I don't have to let anybody in my house with the pistol.
[56:10.200 --> 56:15.200]  And if the fed show up with pistols on, I take that as a threat to you.
[56:15.200 --> 56:24.200]  And if you've made a criminal charge against a fed in the state that has no business talking to you,
[56:24.200 --> 56:34.200]  and they can only be talking to you for the purpose of finding information to use against you.
[56:34.200 --> 56:40.200]  Then they're going to hit the road because if it don't, I call 911.
[56:40.200 --> 56:50.200]  And then you accuse the judge of sending them out to tamper with the witness obstruction of justice.
[56:50.200 --> 56:53.200]  Now, we know they're going to do this.
[56:53.200 --> 56:59.200]  And in effect, what they will feel like is you set them up.
[56:59.200 --> 57:01.200]  You set them up so you could do that.
[57:01.200 --> 57:04.200]  If they can't see you, they can't talk to you.
[57:04.200 --> 57:11.200]  They can't deal with you. You are absolutely an unknown quantity.
[57:11.200 --> 57:21.200]  They can't gauge what they're dealing with, and they will always imagine much worse than what is really before them.
[57:21.200 --> 57:31.200]  The whole point of all of this is to bring enough political pressure to get the judge to either disqualify himself,
[57:31.200 --> 57:36.200]  in this case he absolutely has the beauty to do that,
[57:36.200 --> 57:43.200]  or you might get someone else to take care of the judge for you.
[57:43.200 --> 57:51.200]  One thing to understand, the higher level position you're in, the more vulnerable you are.
[57:51.200 --> 58:00.200]  Because the higher you are in the bucket, the more crabs you've got down below you trying to pull you back and take your place.
[58:00.200 --> 58:02.200]  It's all about crabs in the bucket.
[58:02.200 --> 58:06.200]  The higher the judge is, the more you need to seek ass.
[58:06.200 --> 58:08.200]  And he's not afraid of you.
[58:08.200 --> 58:14.200]  He's afraid of you providing cannon fodder for his people.
[58:14.200 --> 58:16.200]  Because he's healthy and extravagant.
[58:16.200 --> 58:19.200]  Because he's very chuffed and he's deeply afraid.
[58:19.200 --> 58:21.200]  He's on video.
[58:21.200 --> 58:24.200]  When you come back, he's going to go to the school.
[58:24.200 --> 58:30.200]  And he's got some issues to talk about for quite a while.
[58:30.200 --> 58:32.200]  George, I see you there.
[58:32.200 --> 58:34.200]  We'll take you right after you.
[58:34.200 --> 58:37.200]  Present some information for us.
[58:37.200 --> 58:39.200]  But keep calling me and get in line.
[58:39.200 --> 58:44.200]  This is our calling number is 512-646-1984.
[58:44.200 --> 58:45.200]  We're at our radio.
[58:45.200 --> 58:47.200]  We have big seasons.
[58:47.200 --> 58:54.200]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[59:17.200 --> 59:19.200]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:19.200 --> 59:23.200]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate.
[59:23.200 --> 59:28.200]  But the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:28.200 --> 59:32.200]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:32.200 --> 59:38.200]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:38.200 --> 59:43.200]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:43.200 --> 59:54.200]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:54.200 --> 59:58.200]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:58.200 --> 01:00:27.200]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:27.200 --> 01:00:32.200]  Media Watchdog Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting has criticized ABC World News
[01:00:32.200 --> 01:00:34.200]  for broadcasting a, quote,
[01:00:34.200 --> 01:00:40.200]  blatantly propagandistic report on the supposed threat Iran poses to the U.S.
[01:00:40.200 --> 01:00:44.200]  Anchor Diane Sawyer, Echo Director of National Intelligence,
[01:00:44.200 --> 01:00:45.200]  James Clapper's claim,
[01:00:45.200 --> 01:00:46.200]  Iran is, quote,
[01:00:46.200 --> 01:00:50.200]  more determined than ever to launch an attack on U.S. soil.
[01:00:50.200 --> 01:01:00.200]  Fair accused ABC News of passing along incendiary allegations from government officials without skeptical scrutiny.
[01:01:00.200 --> 01:01:04.200]  The American Civil Liberties Union Wednesday filed a lawsuit demanding the government release
[01:01:04.200 --> 01:01:08.200]  basic information about its targeted killing program.
[01:01:08.200 --> 01:01:14.200]  The ACLU suit overlaps one recently filed by the New York Times seeking the legal memos
[01:01:14.200 --> 01:01:17.200]  on which the targeted killing program is based.
[01:01:17.200 --> 01:01:22.200]  The ACLU suit is broader seeking the government's evidentiary basis for strikes
[01:01:22.200 --> 01:01:27.200]  that killed three Americans in Yemen last year.
[01:01:27.200 --> 01:01:31.200]  The New York Times reported Friday that Securities and Exchange Commission
[01:01:31.200 --> 01:01:36.200]  has repeatedly let Wall Street's biggest firms off the hook in fraud cases.
[01:01:36.200 --> 01:01:43.200]  A Times analysis of SEC investigations over the last decade found nearly 350 cases
[01:01:43.200 --> 01:01:46.200]  where the agency gave big Wall Street institutions a pass.
[01:01:46.200 --> 01:01:51.200]  J.P. Morgan Chase has settled six fraud cases in the last 13 years,
[01:01:51.200 --> 01:01:55.200]  but has obtained at least 22 waivers, partly by arguing and has, quote,
[01:01:55.200 --> 01:01:59.200]  a strong record of compliance with Securities laws.
[01:01:59.200 --> 01:02:03.200]  Bank of America and Merrill Lynch, which merged in 2009,
[01:02:03.200 --> 01:02:08.200]  have settled 15 fraud cases and received at least 39 waivers.
[01:02:08.200 --> 01:02:16.200]  Interpress Service reports Israel is counting on the influence of right-wing extremist views in U.S. politics
[01:02:16.200 --> 01:02:20.200]  to bring pressure to bear on Barack Obama to greenlight a possible Israeli attack
[01:02:20.200 --> 01:02:23.200]  during the election campaign this fall.
[01:02:23.200 --> 01:02:26.200]  The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey,
[01:02:26.200 --> 01:02:31.200]  told Israeli leaders recently the U.S. would not participate in a war against Iran
[01:02:31.200 --> 01:02:34.200]  begun by Israel without prior agreement from Washington.
[01:02:34.200 --> 01:02:38.200]  Dempsey's warning conveyed to both Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
[01:02:38.200 --> 01:02:43.200]  and Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak represents Obama's strongest move yet
[01:02:43.200 --> 01:02:49.200]  to deter an Israeli attack and ensure the U.S. is not caught up in a regional conflagration with Iran.
[01:02:49.200 --> 01:02:53.200]  But the Israeli government remains defiant about maintaining its freedom of action
[01:02:53.200 --> 01:03:05.200]  to make war on Iran despite receiving billions in U.S. military aid.
[01:03:05.200 --> 01:03:24.200]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:03:35.200 --> 01:03:45.200]  Okay, we're back.
[01:03:45.200 --> 01:03:56.200]  James seemed to have dropped off at a moment, but did you have George who wanted to make a comment on this issue?
[01:03:56.200 --> 01:04:00.200]  George, you heard something you wanted to add?
[01:04:00.200 --> 01:04:10.200]  Yes, this is the first time I've listened to your program and it's extremely informative and very articulate.
[01:04:10.200 --> 01:04:20.200]  I'm a local activist here in Washington, D.C. and two weeks ago I came across those.
[01:04:20.200 --> 01:04:26.200]  William Windsor referred to a couple of gentlemen who were coming in out of Texas to me
[01:04:26.200 --> 01:04:32.200]  and they had this story and he wanted me to do a background on them and see if I could help them.
[01:04:32.200 --> 01:04:38.200]  So once they came here, I did several videos in my offices
[01:04:38.200 --> 01:04:45.200]  and then I physically took them down to the halls of Congress and we went to Congressman after Congressman
[01:04:45.200 --> 01:04:52.200]  and Senator after Senator, informing them that they needed help with this federal judge.
[01:04:52.200 --> 01:05:02.200]  We had several positive meetings and a lot of them would just blow off by congressional staff
[01:05:02.200 --> 01:05:15.200]  who have no idea or concept to put the inquiries under Title V USC 2902 to 2907.
[01:05:15.200 --> 01:05:23.200]  So we've been mounting a media campaign to let people know
[01:05:23.200 --> 01:05:30.200]  that these judges are actually committing terrorism against the Constitution of the United States.
[01:05:30.200 --> 01:05:37.200]  Okay, hold on a second. Did you file a judicial conduct complaint against this judge?
[01:05:37.200 --> 01:05:44.200]  No, he couldn't file it because when the judge issued the order and put him in receivership
[01:05:44.200 --> 01:05:48.200]  they got to realize this man was worth...
[01:05:48.200 --> 01:05:55.200]  Wait a minute, hold on. He doesn't have to file it. Anybody can file it.
[01:05:55.200 --> 01:05:58.200]  I can't? Absolutely.
[01:05:58.200 --> 01:06:03.200]  Well, great. I filed tons of them. I filed in Maryland.
[01:06:03.200 --> 01:06:11.200]  I've got probably at least 21 judges, state and federal judges that I have asked for guidance
[01:06:11.200 --> 01:06:21.200]  and criminal complaints against dating back 19 years that they started robbing me of everything I had.
[01:06:21.200 --> 01:06:28.200]  So I'll file one of them heartbeat against them. That doesn't break my heart at the slightest.
[01:06:28.200 --> 01:06:36.200]  And if you're knowledgeable and experienced, you know, when you file a judicial conduct complaint against a judge in the Fed,
[01:06:36.200 --> 01:06:45.200]  it becomes an action before the court. And the one thing it does to the judge is it puts a permanent mark
[01:06:45.200 --> 01:06:53.200]  and it also raises his boundary. The only way I know we get rid of a judge is get his boundary vote.
[01:06:53.200 --> 01:07:06.200]  Well, see, I've been after that and I have petitioned the state of Maryland and the United States numerous times
[01:07:06.200 --> 01:07:14.200]  and the legislature to give me the name of the judicial bond holder and the amount that the judge,
[01:07:14.200 --> 01:07:24.200]  the date he was due and, you know, his bond holder so I could file a civil complaint against the bond
[01:07:24.200 --> 01:07:32.200]  and freeze the bond because, you know, everything that's being done here is a fraud upon a fraud upon a fraud.
[01:07:32.200 --> 01:07:45.200]  It took me five tries to petition every member of the General Assembly to finally get an answer back from the
[01:07:45.200 --> 01:08:02.200]  Maryland Attorney General's Office of February 22nd last year that said that my question to the General Assembly was does he, for them to supply me with a constitutional amendment that allows courts
[01:08:02.200 --> 01:08:11.200]  and judicial officers to issue unsigned orders in conflict with our Constitution Article 4, Section 1.
[01:08:11.200 --> 01:08:22.200]  And I got a positive letter back from the Attorney General on behalf of the entire General Assembly which said he was
[01:08:22.200 --> 01:08:40.200]  responding on behalf of the General Assembly that I was absolutely correct that under Redmond v. Chance that the judges have to sign that order in a wet form and I am entitled to a signed order.
[01:08:40.200 --> 01:08:53.200]  So I have 300 unsigned orders in the U.S. Supreme Court in Case 10-10236.
[01:08:53.200 --> 01:08:58.200]  Are you familiar with 18 U.S. Code 242?
[01:08:58.200 --> 01:09:04.200]  Yes, I am. I'm very familiar with that.
[01:09:04.200 --> 01:09:24.200]  Okay, if a judge has a ministerial duty to sign an order and he fails to sign the order and the failure to sign the order harms you or denies you in the form of free access to your enjoyment of the right, that's a class A misdemeanor.
[01:09:24.200 --> 01:09:42.200]  And that's what they're doing with Jeff. See, they use these rubber stamp orders. They use these rubber stamps or clerk's orders or electronic signatures which they won't produce upon request under the 2000 E-Sign Act.
[01:09:42.200 --> 01:09:58.200]  And they've ordered the liquidation of $60 billion worth of existence just the day before yesterday at two cents of a dollar to court the insiders.
[01:09:58.200 --> 01:10:02.200]  Well then, have you filed against him criminally?
[01:10:02.200 --> 01:10:12.200]  Well, I was at the U.S. Department of Justice today in Washington, D.C.
[01:10:12.200 --> 01:10:14.200]  Okay, criminal complaints. Okay, hold on.
[01:10:14.200 --> 01:10:18.200]  Okay, well that's where you have to start. You have to go to the I.
[01:10:18.200 --> 01:10:20.200]  No, you don't. That's a lie.
[01:10:20.200 --> 01:10:24.200]  No, you don't. Stop. Stop. They're lying to you.
[01:10:24.200 --> 01:10:33.200]  Nothing in law directs a criminal complaint to an investigating agency. Nothing.
[01:10:33.200 --> 01:10:42.200]  Everything in law directs a criminal complaint to some magistrate.
[01:10:42.200 --> 01:10:45.200]  That's where you start.
[01:10:45.200 --> 01:11:07.200]  You know, when a police officer has reason to believe that a crime has been committed and he wants a warrant, he goes to a magistrate and files a complaint with the magistrate and the magistrate does his duty as a magistrate and holds an examining trial.
[01:11:07.200 --> 01:11:11.200]  All complaints are directed to magistrates.
[01:11:11.200 --> 01:11:21.200]  So I've tried that several times and the magistrates around here in the state of Maryland, I've tried it in several counties.
[01:11:21.200 --> 01:11:30.200]  And each and every time, even though I have clear and convincing evidence, the magistrate refuses to accept complaints.
[01:11:30.200 --> 01:11:34.200]  Good. Good. I hope they do. When I file, I hope they do.
[01:11:34.200 --> 01:11:42.200]  Well, I see you. I believe that I want those people believe that I don't care. At least I'm on record.
[01:11:42.200 --> 01:11:56.200]  I've got a video because every time I step outside of the court room or step outside of the court office, I sit a camera and I do a video record.
[01:11:56.200 --> 01:12:05.200]  This is this is where I'm going. When I try to get when I go after jurisdiction.
[01:12:05.200 --> 01:12:10.200]  I never really want them to do what I asked them to do.
[01:12:10.200 --> 01:12:20.200]  I want them to refuse because I'm going only going to ask them to do something that they are required to do by statute.
[01:12:20.200 --> 01:12:33.200]  In Texas, article 2.10 says it shall be the primary duty of the magistrate to keep the peace in the county by all legal means.
[01:12:33.200 --> 01:12:40.200]  2.11 says what a magistrate sits for the purpose of examining into a criminal accusation that's an examining trial.
[01:12:40.200 --> 01:12:47.200]  There's only three things that a magistrate can do in Texas at least. And this is consistent across the states.
[01:12:47.200 --> 01:12:52.200]  He can marry people. They give them that so they can make extra money.
[01:12:52.200 --> 01:12:59.200]  He can hold an examining trial and find probable cause and he can set bail.
[01:12:59.200 --> 01:13:10.200]  When I go to a judge and put in his hand a verified criminal affidavit, he stops being a judge and he becomes a magistrate.
[01:13:10.200 --> 01:13:24.200]  That's a duty for which they may not shield themselves. So I take them a complaint. I generally start out by going to the prosecuting attorney so that I can get him to refuse to prosecute.
[01:13:24.200 --> 01:13:36.200]  Then I prepare a complaint against the prosecutor and go to give it to a judge and ask the judge to hold an examining trial based on my criminal accusation and he's going to refuse.
[01:13:36.200 --> 01:13:49.200]  And then I get to accuse the judge of failing to perform a duty he is requiring to perform and in the process deny me in the equal protection of the laws.
[01:13:49.200 --> 01:13:54.200]  And that's a crime in the Fed and it's a crime in most every other state I've looked at.
[01:13:54.200 --> 01:14:02.200]  So I want him not to do it so that I can hammer him. I forget about the first one and then I go after this judge.
[01:14:02.200 --> 01:14:10.200]  And if it's a low level judge, I want to get to the highest level judge I can as quickly as I can.
[01:14:10.200 --> 01:14:17.200]  So I like to just send my second complaint to the highest district judge I can find.
[01:14:17.200 --> 01:14:26.200]  I am about to send a set of criminal complaints to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas.
[01:14:26.200 --> 01:14:36.200]  It is notice under Rule 18 under recusal that the head of administrative judge of the district has been disqualified.
[01:14:36.200 --> 01:14:39.200]  Therefore, notice is required to be given to him.
[01:14:39.200 --> 01:14:45.200]  And a statement in support of my notice will be a set of verified criminal affidavits.
[01:14:45.200 --> 01:14:57.200]  He's going to look at those criminal affidavits and forget that when he is presented with a verified criminal affidavit it evokes his duty as a magistrate.
[01:14:57.200 --> 01:15:04.200]  Then under 2.09 code of criminal procedure says who are magistrates? He's the first one on the list.
[01:15:04.200 --> 01:15:11.200]  And then I will charge him with official oppression for failing to perform a duty he's required to perform.
[01:15:11.200 --> 01:15:15.200]  Now he is not going to be a happy camper.
[01:15:15.200 --> 01:15:25.200]  And he's going to go to the people I'm complaining about and say, why is this guy trying to get me indicted because of you?
[01:15:25.200 --> 01:15:30.200]  You will not win your case because you have the law and the facts on your side.
[01:15:30.200 --> 01:15:34.200]  It is not that way now. It never has been that way.
[01:15:34.200 --> 01:15:43.200]  You will only win your case if you have the politics on your side and all politics is local.
[01:15:43.200 --> 01:15:47.200]  This is how we generate local politics.
[01:15:47.200 --> 01:15:53.200]  We get all these people mad at each other because they're having a problem.
[01:15:53.200 --> 01:16:00.200]  You're trying to get to grand juries and grand juries scared of Jesus out of all of them.
[01:16:00.200 --> 01:16:14.200]  Scalia in Williams v. U.S. said that while the federal court consecrates the grand jury, once it is impaneled,
[01:16:14.200 --> 01:16:23.200]  the grand jury becomes a fourth branch of government and owes no duty to the court.
[01:16:23.200 --> 01:16:30.200]  That's why they were put there. They were put there to terrify our public officials.
[01:16:30.200 --> 01:16:33.200]  And they do just exactly that.
[01:16:33.200 --> 01:16:37.200]  If we start working those, we start getting some action.
[01:16:37.200 --> 01:16:41.200]  Hang on. Hang on, George. I'll be right back on the other side.
[01:16:41.200 --> 01:16:43.200]  This is Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens and Craig.
[01:16:43.200 --> 01:16:54.200]  Here's my radio. Call I am at 502-646-1984. You'll be right back.
[01:17:14.200 --> 01:17:21.200]  Ammunition at 10% above wholesale prices, Berkey water products, gift certificates and our silver pool.
[01:17:21.200 --> 01:17:25.200]  A new way to guarantee silver by prepaying at a locked price.
[01:17:25.200 --> 01:17:32.200]  We can even help you set up a metals IRA account. Call us at 512-646-644-0 for more details.
[01:17:32.200 --> 01:17:40.200]  As always, we buy, sell and trade precious metals, give appraisals and cater to those with all sizes of coin collections.
[01:17:40.200 --> 01:17:47.200]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half a mile north of Canig next to the Ikiban Sushi and Jeanne Carwash.
[01:17:47.200 --> 01:17:51.200]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[01:17:51.200 --> 01:18:11.200]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-644-0 and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[01:18:21.200 --> 01:18:24.200]  That's why our name is FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:24.200 --> 01:18:31.200]  Finally, residential, mobile and business telephones and plans that are private and never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:31.200 --> 01:18:38.200]  When a low price, residential and business plans started only $14.99 and mobile plans started just $39.99.
[01:18:38.200 --> 01:18:44.200]  Plus, every month you pay your bill, FreedomTelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs.
[01:18:44.200 --> 01:18:53.200]  Don't wait, support the cause and get the highest quality and the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553.
[01:18:53.200 --> 01:18:56.200]  That's 800-600-5553.
[01:18:56.200 --> 01:19:25.200]  FreedomTelephones.com, portable, private, perfect.
[01:19:25.200 --> 01:19:35.200]  If I can get everything I want.
[01:19:35.200 --> 01:19:43.200]  If I get everything I need.
[01:19:43.200 --> 01:19:50.200]  If I can get everything I need.
[01:19:50.200 --> 01:20:01.200]  And George, I don't mean to patronize, and I realize that you are a long time legal researcher
[01:20:01.200 --> 01:20:04.640]  and you're pretty knowledgeable in your own right.
[01:20:04.640 --> 01:20:11.360]  Most of what I was saying there was for those people who aren't experienced in this arena,
[01:20:11.360 --> 01:20:15.440]  so I hope you don't think I was patronizing you or talking down to you there.
[01:20:15.440 --> 01:20:21.840]  You know what, knowledge is a great thing, and I was just commenting to everybody exactly
[01:20:21.840 --> 01:20:28.840]  the extent of your knowledge, and you know, if you don't ask a question, you never learn
[01:20:28.840 --> 01:20:29.840]  the answer.
[01:20:29.840 --> 01:20:30.840]  Precisely.
[01:20:30.840 --> 01:20:35.240]  The only dumb question is the one you didn't ask.
[01:20:35.240 --> 01:20:45.040]  That's exactly it, and you know, for 19 years I have roughly 10,000 documentaries
[01:20:45.040 --> 01:20:53.640]  of 107 court cases, and so I have an extreme history of fighting for victims' rights,
[01:20:53.640 --> 01:21:00.280]  and Jeff, when he came here from Texas, he had to borrow clothes to come here, even though
[01:21:00.280 --> 01:21:07.640]  the day before Thanksgiving, 2010, he was worth $140 million at three o'clock in the
[01:21:07.640 --> 01:21:18.040]  afternoon, at five o'clock in the afternoon, he was worth zero, and they signed the trustee,
[01:21:18.040 --> 01:21:29.240]  the receiver had a secret order put in the court that if he attempted to hire an attorney
[01:21:29.240 --> 01:21:36.920]  to fight this illegal receivership, that he would immediately be put in jail.
[01:21:36.920 --> 01:21:45.520]  So this is, I'm trying to help a Texan, I'm not familiar with Texas law, I contacted
[01:21:45.520 --> 01:21:52.400]  the Texas Attorney General's office, they won't send me a document of that, but I contacted
[01:21:52.400 --> 01:21:58.400]  the Texas Rangers criminal investigation unit, they won't call back.
[01:21:58.400 --> 01:22:07.080]  Okay, I can tell you from experience, the Texas Rangers are absolutely worthless.
[01:22:07.080 --> 01:22:14.760]  That's because they're under the DPS, remember that the DPS, no member of the DPS, may investigate
[01:22:14.760 --> 01:22:21.840]  any public official without direct authority from the director of the department.
[01:22:21.840 --> 01:22:30.480]  Well, I am as media, I have a media credentials in Washington D.C. and the state of Maryland.
[01:22:30.480 --> 01:22:33.080]  Same credentials as CNN has.
[01:22:33.080 --> 01:22:41.080]  So I go after with public information requests to a FOIA request, and I build my case in
[01:22:41.080 --> 01:22:47.320]  a different way than most people do, and so I hammer them, I go right, I've asked for
[01:22:47.320 --> 01:22:54.200]  the indictments against, we even sued them for sending out 9,000 to 10,000 unsigned orders
[01:22:54.200 --> 01:23:01.360]  by the Supreme Court every year, which judges never see, and dismissing cases, so this is
[01:23:01.360 --> 01:23:06.200]  certainly already to benefit the Mafia-controlled American Bar Association.
[01:23:06.200 --> 01:23:16.360]  So like I said, I won't go into my cases, but I'm calling on behalf of Jeff Barron and
[01:23:16.360 --> 01:23:23.800]  John Morgan as Texas Rangers, Texas residents who are being terrorized by the Mafia-controlled
[01:23:23.800 --> 01:23:26.360]  courts in Texas.
[01:23:26.360 --> 01:23:27.360]  And so...
[01:23:27.360 --> 01:23:33.480]  We are very aware of these courts, and we're doing what we can to give people tools to
[01:23:33.480 --> 01:23:34.760]  fight back with.
[01:23:34.760 --> 01:23:43.920]  Well, but my question is, like I said, I went down and rattled cages at the 900 Pennsylvania
[01:23:43.920 --> 01:23:49.720]  Avenue, the FBI, the Justice Department headquarters today, you know, all their doors are locked,
[01:23:49.720 --> 01:23:54.480]  you get into the reception area, well, we can't take anything, we can't...
[01:23:54.480 --> 01:23:59.160]  So I just, I said, listen, I said it loud enough and long enough in front of their video
[01:23:59.160 --> 01:24:04.440]  cameras that they knew that the federal judge had threatened the life of this man.
[01:24:04.440 --> 01:24:09.760]  And then we walked out of there, took a video of it, walked around the court to the FBI
[01:24:09.760 --> 01:24:16.560]  headquarters, and once again, they stand behind bulletproof glass in violation of the
[01:24:16.560 --> 01:24:20.280]  oath of office, and nobody can talk to you.
[01:24:20.280 --> 01:24:27.960]  So they said, well, told me I can go into the FBI offices on 4th Street, Monday, and
[01:24:27.960 --> 01:24:30.640]  there'll be an agent there who will hear me.
[01:24:30.640 --> 01:24:37.720]  Now, before I do that, some of what you're saying, you know, I know that I'm not allowed
[01:24:37.720 --> 01:24:51.120]  to set me up, but, you know, the complaint I'm filing is that the judges have now asserted
[01:24:51.120 --> 01:24:56.040]  that somebody made some kind of fictitious complaint against them, and they have Homeland
[01:24:56.040 --> 01:25:04.800]  Security terrorizing all of Jeff's families, friends, and business associates in Texas,
[01:25:04.800 --> 01:25:08.240]  and they have the U.S. Marshals also terrorizing...
[01:25:08.240 --> 01:25:09.560]  Okay, wait a minute.
[01:25:09.560 --> 01:25:12.160]  I talked to him earlier, and this was my suggestion.
[01:25:12.160 --> 01:25:14.800]  I know he's staying at my house here in Maryland.
[01:25:14.800 --> 01:25:15.800]  Okay.
[01:25:15.800 --> 01:25:16.800]  I talk...
[01:25:16.800 --> 01:25:17.800]  Hold on.
[01:25:17.800 --> 01:25:20.640]  I talked to him earlier, and this was my suggestion.
[01:25:20.640 --> 01:25:27.640]  If any of his friends are visited by a federal agent, call 9-1-1.
[01:25:27.640 --> 01:25:28.640]  Yeah.
[01:25:28.640 --> 01:25:29.640]  Do it immediately.
[01:25:29.640 --> 01:25:32.160]  We'll pass this on now.
[01:25:32.160 --> 01:25:37.640]  This is exactly the information that we need, and, you know, I expect him to come knocking
[01:25:37.640 --> 01:25:42.600]  on my door, and I will do the exact same thing.
[01:25:42.600 --> 01:25:44.680]  And this is what I do, you know.
[01:25:44.680 --> 01:25:48.960]  I call the police and I say, I got this guy here with the gun.
[01:25:48.960 --> 01:25:51.120]  I don't know who he is.
[01:25:51.120 --> 01:25:57.120]  He claims to be a federal agent, but even if he is, then he is interfering with a state
[01:25:57.120 --> 01:26:02.920]  issue, and he can only be here to threaten and intimidate me, I want you to come out
[01:26:02.920 --> 01:26:06.960]  and take my criminal accusation against him.
[01:26:06.960 --> 01:26:11.960]  And I can tell you, these guys get real excited when you do that, and they get real careful.
[01:26:11.960 --> 01:26:12.960]  Yeah.
[01:26:12.960 --> 01:26:20.960]  John, I got him on video tape yesterday when they were at his threatening him and his 81-year-old
[01:26:20.960 --> 01:26:29.200]  mother, and you can hear him on the video, on the audio, rather, saying, can I see your
[01:26:29.200 --> 01:26:31.960]  badges and we can identify yourself?
[01:26:31.960 --> 01:26:32.960]  No.
[01:26:32.960 --> 01:26:33.960]  No.
[01:26:33.960 --> 01:26:34.960]  No.
[01:26:34.960 --> 01:26:44.000]  And that's the, you know, they have a duty of office to present their badges and to be
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:53.160]  identified so that nobody, an impostor can't come in and perform their duties for them.
[01:26:53.160 --> 01:26:54.160]  So...
[01:26:54.160 --> 01:26:58.560]  When they don't identify themselves, I should get an immediate 911 call.
[01:26:58.560 --> 01:26:59.560]  Yes.
[01:26:59.560 --> 01:27:00.560]  So...
[01:27:00.560 --> 01:27:01.560]  9-1-1 changes everything.
[01:27:01.560 --> 01:27:02.560]  Yes.
[01:27:02.560 --> 01:27:09.760]  You know, I'm just really sure that John is protected, and that all the media knows about
[01:27:09.760 --> 01:27:10.760]  this.
[01:27:10.760 --> 01:27:11.760]  Okay.
[01:27:11.760 --> 01:27:19.760]  Some of the things you're doing would concern me, considering the depth of this situation.
[01:27:19.760 --> 01:27:21.760]  This is deep water you're trading here.
[01:27:21.760 --> 01:27:23.760]  Oh, it went up.
[01:27:23.760 --> 01:27:29.160]  But why do you think I took him right just, I took him into the Senate office building
[01:27:29.160 --> 01:27:34.520]  in the House office and met with all the members of the judiciary, sub-staffs and stuff
[01:27:34.520 --> 01:27:39.280]  like that, and I videotaped them standing outside of their office.
[01:27:39.280 --> 01:27:43.160]  I said, what do you want, what are you hoping to gain here?
[01:27:43.160 --> 01:27:48.560]  And then when they came back out of the meeting, I videotaped that, I put it right up on my
[01:27:48.560 --> 01:27:49.560]  website.
[01:27:49.560 --> 01:27:57.200]  It's secretjustice.com, programs 400 to 410, I believe.
[01:27:57.200 --> 01:27:59.520]  So now, I want to make a record.
[01:27:59.520 --> 01:28:06.520]  I want, every time I do it, I make a video record so that, you know, when this stuff
[01:28:06.520 --> 01:28:09.520]  gets us out of here, it gets to a grand jury.
[01:28:09.520 --> 01:28:10.520]  Okay.
[01:28:10.520 --> 01:28:11.520]  What?
[01:28:11.520 --> 01:28:12.520]  It gets to the grand jury.
[01:28:12.520 --> 01:28:13.520]  Okay.
[01:28:13.520 --> 01:28:19.040]  One of the things that we talk about here is politics.
[01:28:19.040 --> 01:28:20.040]  Everything's political.
[01:28:20.040 --> 01:28:22.040]  So how do we make this political?
[01:28:22.040 --> 01:28:30.120]  And one of the ways we try to make it political is we try to engage someone who is absolutely
[01:28:30.120 --> 01:28:36.400]  innocent in the whole thing and then bring pressure on them.
[01:28:36.400 --> 01:28:39.720]  That's why I run this routine on the prosecutor.
[01:28:39.720 --> 01:28:44.720]  I give him a complaint, and he refuses to act, and then I go to the district judge and give
[01:28:44.720 --> 01:28:47.240]  him a complaint, and he refuses to act.
[01:28:47.240 --> 01:28:52.400]  I go back to the grand jury after the district judge, and he's going to say, what?
[01:28:52.400 --> 01:28:53.400]  What did I do?
[01:28:53.400 --> 01:28:55.920]  I didn't do anything to do with this.
[01:28:55.920 --> 01:28:56.920]  It goes to the prosecutor.
[01:28:56.920 --> 01:28:58.920]  What is going on here?
[01:28:58.920 --> 01:28:59.920]  That's the politics.
[01:28:59.920 --> 01:29:06.240]  We can create that kind of politics where we have people engaged that don't want to
[01:29:06.240 --> 01:29:11.240]  be engaged, that don't have a dog in this hunt.
[01:29:11.240 --> 01:29:14.040]  That's why I'm suggesting state.
[01:29:14.040 --> 01:29:16.240]  Everybody has a dog in this fight.
[01:29:16.240 --> 01:29:17.240]  Okay.
[01:29:17.240 --> 01:29:21.140]  Generally and theoretically, yes.
[01:29:21.140 --> 01:29:22.640]  But not directly.
[01:29:22.640 --> 01:29:30.960]  The state district judge doesn't have a dog in this fight until you give him one.
[01:29:30.960 --> 01:29:35.360]  You go down and suck him into the middle of this.
[01:29:35.360 --> 01:29:39.000]  He is not going to have one.
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:41.600]  He will get on other people to make this go away.
[01:29:41.600 --> 01:29:46.600]  This is Randy Chalkin, Devil's Feet of David Craig, you hear about radio?
[01:29:46.600 --> 01:29:50.160]  We need to finish this off because I have a dress that needs to get you.
[01:29:50.160 --> 01:29:55.120]  So we'll be right back on the other side, and we'll finish this issue up, and then we'll
[01:29:55.120 --> 01:29:57.120]  go to film.
[01:29:57.120 --> 01:30:06.160]  A noble lie, Oklahoma City, 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature
[01:30:06.160 --> 01:30:07.160]  of terrorism.
[01:30:07.160 --> 01:30:11.080]  Based on the damage pattern to the building, but the government seems impossible.
[01:30:11.080 --> 01:30:14.800]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:30:14.800 --> 01:30:18.560]  The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[01:30:18.560 --> 01:30:23.280]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:23.280 --> 01:30:27.040]  The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[01:30:27.040 --> 01:30:30.120]  Expose the cover-up now at InnobleLie.com.
[01:30:30.120 --> 01:30:38.920]  Year out, umpires have made that famous call for more than a century, but now video cameras
[01:30:38.920 --> 01:30:40.920]  may make the sports tough as calls.
[01:30:40.920 --> 01:30:45.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell you why instant replay may take the heart
[01:30:45.120 --> 01:30:47.640]  out of baseball next.
[01:30:47.640 --> 01:30:49.360]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:49.360 --> 01:30:53.800]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy
[01:30:53.800 --> 01:30:57.960]  is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:57.960 --> 01:31:03.200]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:31:03.200 --> 01:31:05.720]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:31:05.720 --> 01:31:11.360]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:31:11.360 --> 01:31:13.080]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:31:13.080 --> 01:31:16.600]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:31:16.600 --> 01:31:20.560]  Baseball fans and the media want Major League Baseball to go high tech.
[01:31:20.560 --> 01:31:24.800]  They want computer footage to verify nearly every call an umpire makes.
[01:31:24.800 --> 01:31:30.120]  Already, instant replay is being expanded to judge close foul calls and trapped balls.
[01:31:30.120 --> 01:31:35.960]  But putting computers in charge will sterilize baseball and erode its essence, which is theater,
[01:31:35.960 --> 01:31:36.960]  not flawlessness.
[01:31:36.960 --> 01:31:39.600]  Baseball is again not a courtroom.
[01:31:39.600 --> 01:31:43.480]  To calls get blown, sure, and when they do, we get theater.
[01:31:43.480 --> 01:31:48.640]  Dirt kicking managers, pleading players, and a whole stadium booing the umpire.
[01:31:48.640 --> 01:31:51.200]  Baseball is about transcending imperfection.
[01:31:51.200 --> 01:31:54.200]  If we forget this, we may forget why we love the game.
[01:31:54.200 --> 01:32:24.040]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:32:24.200 --> 01:32:54.040]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, the world's most private search engine.
[01:32:54.040 --> 01:33:23.000]  Okay, hold on guys, we're on the air and we seem to be having a separate discussion.
[01:33:23.000 --> 01:33:31.600]  We do need to finish off this issue, uh, no more than I know about the issue is it appears
[01:33:31.600 --> 01:33:39.440]  as though if this judge is really acting this outrageous and the maxim is go to the state
[01:33:39.440 --> 01:33:44.800]  against the feds, go to the feds against the state, the state judges are not going to have
[01:33:44.800 --> 01:33:47.360]  any real sympathy for this federal judge.
[01:33:47.360 --> 01:33:51.640]  Okay, so what does he do about, I know he goes to the state.
[01:33:51.640 --> 01:34:01.680]  Well, can we file the complaint with the magistrate in absentia of Maryland because if he steps
[01:34:01.680 --> 01:34:05.080]  off of a plane in Texas, he's going to be arrested.
[01:34:05.080 --> 01:34:06.080]  Oh, yeah.
[01:34:06.080 --> 01:34:07.080]  Do it by mail.
[01:34:07.080 --> 01:34:09.280]  He's going to be put in the FEMA camp.
[01:34:09.280 --> 01:34:10.680]  Okay, I understand that.
[01:34:10.680 --> 01:34:11.840]  Do it by mail.
[01:34:11.840 --> 01:34:14.400]  You don't have to, he didn't have to go to Texas.
[01:34:14.400 --> 01:34:15.400]  Okay.
[01:34:15.400 --> 01:34:17.400]  So we can do it by mail.
[01:34:17.400 --> 01:34:18.400]  Okay.
[01:34:18.400 --> 01:34:21.340]  That's one of the things I was concerned about because I'll get that.
[01:34:21.340 --> 01:34:27.980]  get that out and certify mail that out. That'll be before I go to meet with the FBI on Monday.
[01:34:27.980 --> 01:34:29.620]  We will have that.
[01:34:29.620 --> 01:34:36.300]  I'm going to suggest that you not meet with the FBI. This is not a federal crime you're
[01:34:36.300 --> 01:34:41.100]  talking about. This is a state crime.
[01:34:41.100 --> 01:34:50.420]  No, no, it's a federal judge. It's a federal bank fraud under 18 USC 3057, the United States
[01:34:50.420 --> 01:34:54.580]  don't. No, wait a minute, wait a minute. The most outrageous thing you have is a judge
[01:34:54.580 --> 01:34:56.580]  threatening this guy.
[01:34:56.580 --> 01:34:57.580]  Well, this is true.
[01:34:57.580 --> 01:35:01.580]  But that's not a federal crime. That's a state crime.
[01:35:01.580 --> 01:35:05.740]  You know, I'm a person who believes you got to get the crack. You got to crack that door
[01:35:05.740 --> 01:35:13.020]  so you can at least get some evidence in. Under 18 USC 3057, I is immediate and required
[01:35:13.020 --> 01:35:27.740]  to report a bankruptcy fraud to the U.S. officials in charge. Okay, I've already done that, but
[01:35:27.740 --> 01:35:30.940]  they have failed to do their due diligence and due duty.
[01:35:30.940 --> 01:35:36.740]  Of course they're going to do that because they all live in it. They all have their schnouts
[01:35:36.740 --> 01:35:37.740]  in the same drawer.
[01:35:37.740 --> 01:35:45.420]  Oh, of course they do. That's why you don't go there. Go to the state. Go to a place they
[01:35:45.420 --> 01:35:46.420]  don't control.
[01:35:46.420 --> 01:35:53.900]  Okay, well, that's what I'm saying. I will already have a certified registered letter
[01:35:53.900 --> 01:36:04.020]  pre-mailed before I go to these people. Okay, but because you went earlier, you said if
[01:36:04.020 --> 01:36:13.140]  you bring the charges first against a lower party than the judge, if you can. But we need
[01:36:13.140 --> 01:36:23.020]  the receiver and his players are the ones that are being reported to the feds under
[01:36:23.020 --> 01:36:30.820]  federal bankruptcy fraud laws because they're using, they're diluting the assets of the
[01:36:30.820 --> 01:36:38.180]  trust and the $100 million Children's Diabetes Trust, but Jeff...
[01:36:38.180 --> 01:36:43.220]  Okay, wait a minute. We're going to run out of time going through all of that. I understand
[01:36:43.220 --> 01:36:49.660]  they're criminals, but you understand the courts are absolutely corrupt and you're
[01:36:49.660 --> 01:36:57.060]  going to a federal judge asking a federal judge to go after another federal judge. Give
[01:36:57.060 --> 01:37:04.740]  me a break. They're going to use what you give them to come back after you. Guarantee
[01:37:04.740 --> 01:37:11.660]  it. They are corrupt. If you don't get out of their venue, they will swallow you.
[01:37:11.660 --> 01:37:15.060]  Well, they've been trying for 18 years and they haven't made it.
[01:37:15.060 --> 01:37:16.060]  Okay.
[01:37:16.060 --> 01:37:21.860]  You know, I've got a big problem with me and it doesn't bother me in the slightest bit.
[01:37:21.860 --> 01:37:27.900]  It's one of the reasons I run for U.S. Congress. This is the fourth time so that I can bring
[01:37:27.900 --> 01:37:37.140]  this up in every debate as how corrupt the system is. Like you said, you make it uncomfortable
[01:37:37.140 --> 01:37:46.180]  for the other folks who are not really a first party part to this. So I bring it up in a
[01:37:46.180 --> 01:37:51.500]  fashion that most people don't bring it up by bringing up in public debates before multiple
[01:37:51.500 --> 01:38:01.540]  TV cameras so that they all know exactly that I've asked for assistance and I require them.
[01:38:01.540 --> 01:38:02.540]  I require...
[01:38:02.540 --> 01:38:06.180]  Okay, wait. We really have to move on. I'm running out of time.
[01:38:06.180 --> 01:38:08.180]  I have one question for you, Leif.
[01:38:08.180 --> 01:38:09.180]  Okay.
[01:38:09.180 --> 01:38:17.060]  Do you have an audio... Do you sell the audio DVD of this that I can study closely?
[01:38:17.060 --> 01:38:24.740]  We have... Yes, we have. All of our shows are archived. They're free downloads. Generally
[01:38:24.740 --> 01:38:29.260]  within hours or at least the next day, all of our shows would be...
[01:38:29.260 --> 01:38:33.820]  You're doing a fabulous service for the people in the United States.
[01:38:33.820 --> 01:38:34.820]  Thank you.
[01:38:34.820 --> 01:38:44.620]  Not only with your great knowledge, but even your advertisers are unbelievable. That's
[01:38:44.620 --> 01:38:53.060]  what I'm extremely impressed with. This is the first time that I have heard of you and
[01:38:53.060 --> 01:38:58.300]  I'm glad that Jeff called in and I will be back in touch.
[01:38:58.300 --> 01:39:08.300]  Wonderful. Thank you. Okay. Now we're going to go to Phil. Phil Free from Australia. Okay.
[01:39:08.300 --> 01:39:16.020]  You wanted to talk about conflict of interest. Yeah. Well, as I said, a lot of people seem
[01:39:16.020 --> 01:39:26.220]  to get straight caught up in subject matter and argument and it's very enticing, I know.
[01:39:26.220 --> 01:39:33.780]  Yeah. And what we've heard too from that gentleman is it's quite sad to see that there's so many
[01:39:33.780 --> 01:39:42.300]  people out there that work so hard for what they have, but yet spend little or no effort
[01:39:42.300 --> 01:39:50.740]  or energy into protecting what they've worked for, which I find extraordinary. I mean, there's
[01:39:50.740 --> 01:39:56.460]  so many people out there. I'm just just work, work, work hard, hard, hard, earn, earn, earn,
[01:39:56.460 --> 01:40:01.620]  but yet somebody just will walk off the street and say, thanks for all that you worked for
[01:40:01.620 --> 01:40:05.180]  and all that energy and effort and everything that you spend there. I'll just be taking
[01:40:05.180 --> 01:40:10.900]  that from you. Thanks very much. And people just scratch their heads. What happened? What
[01:40:10.900 --> 01:40:15.660]  just happened? And because just think about it. If you're going to invest so much of your
[01:40:15.660 --> 01:40:22.180]  energy and time into working for what you have, consider spending a little bit of time
[01:40:22.180 --> 01:40:26.780]  and energy into protecting what you actually worked for. And I think that's what Randy
[01:40:26.780 --> 01:40:33.740]  and a lot of us messages that we're putting out there is, yeah, you have some sort of
[01:40:33.740 --> 01:40:39.420]  protection around you and knowledge is power. So have some knowledge about you. So if someone
[01:40:39.420 --> 01:40:45.820]  does attack you, you can actually go on the offense, which is really your defence, to
[01:40:45.820 --> 01:40:48.900]  protect what it is that you've worked for in the first place. And that's what this is
[01:40:48.900 --> 01:40:58.100]  all really about. So getting back into what we're talking about, excuse me, is a conflict
[01:40:58.100 --> 01:41:09.100]  of interest, is qualifying who it is that you're dealing with in the first place. So
[01:41:09.100 --> 01:41:18.020]  in most cases, conflict of interest arises now. What is conflict of interest? Now conflict
[01:41:18.020 --> 01:41:27.580]  of interest is where somebody has vested personal or some sort of benefit that regarding their
[01:41:27.580 --> 01:41:35.100]  actions may cause them. So the state and police and government agencies would like you to
[01:41:35.100 --> 01:41:41.580]  think that they are impartial and that there is no conflict of interest and they get no
[01:41:41.580 --> 01:41:48.460]  benefit out of them dealing with you and that couldn't be further from the truth. A policeman
[01:41:48.460 --> 01:41:54.220]  pulling you over, for instance, when there is no real reason for them to pull you over
[01:41:54.220 --> 01:41:59.220]  because there's no what we talked about before corpus dillectae and those sort of things.
[01:41:59.220 --> 01:42:05.860]  But what we're talking about is evidence of injury, harm, damage or loss. So he's getting
[01:42:05.860 --> 01:42:12.660]  state paid. He's state appointed and state paid. For what? Well, he's an employee of
[01:42:12.660 --> 01:42:18.060]  the state. What does employees do? Well, they work for the benefit of whoever employs them,
[01:42:18.060 --> 01:42:26.820]  right? So there's a conflict of interest. Now when you start dealing with people or
[01:42:26.820 --> 01:42:33.500]  state officials, courts, police officers and all that, you need to have a look at it from
[01:42:33.500 --> 01:42:40.980]  a different perspective and qualify who you're dealing with, who's in front of you. Now how
[01:42:40.980 --> 01:42:49.260]  to qualify who is in court? Well, judges, police, lawyers, clerks, all witnesses and
[01:42:49.260 --> 01:42:57.060]  interested parties, et cetera, require, you need to require material evidence of qualifications.
[01:42:57.060 --> 01:43:04.300]  And then ask for their qualifications of all involved, for example. What I usually would
[01:43:04.300 --> 01:43:12.980]  do and I've had that in the past on certain documents is sort of like a Miranda warning,
[01:43:12.980 --> 01:43:18.300]  I guess, is what the police officers first do and they give you to pull you over. You
[01:43:18.300 --> 01:43:26.660]  have the right to remain silent and everything else can and will be used against you in a
[01:43:26.660 --> 01:43:34.420]  court of law. So in regards to that, I'll just put you on mute for a second.
[01:43:34.420 --> 01:43:46.860]  Okay, that's probably that dog out there that can't catch those wallabies. When I was there,
[01:43:46.860 --> 01:43:51.220]  he had some dogs that were really frustrated with the wallabies because he couldn't catch them.
[01:43:51.220 --> 01:43:57.260]  I was just grabbed the couch and then he said, Hey, Craig, use my radio. We're going into
[01:43:57.260 --> 01:44:00.380]  our last segment. We'll be right back on mute.
[01:44:00.380 --> 01:44:07.660]  HempUSA.org has a revolutionary wonder food for detoxing the body and rebuilding the immune
[01:44:07.660 --> 01:44:13.260]  system. Micro plant powder can help unplug arteries and soften heart valves while removing
[01:44:13.260 --> 01:44:18.640]  heavy metals, virus, fungus, bacteria and parasites. Plus, it cleans and purifies the
[01:44:18.640 --> 01:44:25.100]  blood, lungs, stomach and colon. HempUSA.org has moved and expanded its operations for
[01:44:25.100 --> 01:44:30.900]  faster worldwide shipping. Our product line has grown from five to nearly 100 items in
[01:44:30.900 --> 01:44:37.100]  less than five years. Our food is grown naturally, always chemical free, not found in stores.
[01:44:37.100 --> 01:44:44.940]  Great for daily intake and perfect for your emergency storage shelter. Call 908-6912608
[01:44:44.940 --> 01:44:50.420]  or visit HempUSA.org and see what our powders, seeds and oil can do for you.
[01:44:50.420 --> 01:44:58.140]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:44:58.140 --> 01:45:04.460]  the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[01:45:04.460 --> 01:45:10.340]  step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't
[01:45:10.340 --> 01:45:15.300]  have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step
[01:45:15.300 --> 01:45:22.340]  by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22
[01:45:22.340 --> 01:45:27.820]  years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what
[01:45:27.820 --> 01:45:34.140]  everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:34.140 --> 01:45:41.620]  We'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics
[01:45:41.620 --> 01:45:48.060]  and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free
[01:45:48.060 --> 01:46:07.740]  866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:18.060 --> 01:46:41.300]  Yeah, well just before we were talking regarding conflict of interest is how to identify what
[01:46:41.300 --> 01:46:50.860]  a conflict of interest is. And some documents and affidavits that we've prepared, we have
[01:46:50.860 --> 01:46:55.540]  the following statements that some people might find useful and also might be able to
[01:46:55.540 --> 01:47:01.620]  identify with. So it goes something like this, in keeping with the maximum of law, an unrebutted
[01:47:01.620 --> 01:47:08.180]  affidavit stands as truth in law. I submit this, my affidavit. I rebut the complaint
[01:47:08.180 --> 01:47:15.380]  affidavit accusations of John Doe or whoever it is that may be relevant at the time and
[01:47:15.380 --> 01:47:21.100]  validate that they are invalid by protest and rebut all statements, submissions, accusations
[01:47:21.100 --> 01:47:28.660]  by third parties based on unsworn testimony. He say with no first hand personal knowledge
[01:47:28.660 --> 01:47:36.220]  who are creating a controversy, whom have vested interest financial or other and regard
[01:47:36.220 --> 01:47:44.340]  them to be vexatious, frivolous, unwarranted and invalid. Namely police, police prosecutor,
[01:47:44.340 --> 01:47:51.020]  lawyers, whom have all failed to provide any material fact or evidence supporting any damages
[01:47:51.020 --> 01:47:58.540]  injuries, loss, trespass or harm. The author does not consent to the proceedings as there
[01:47:58.540 --> 01:48:04.580]  is a conflict of interest by parties involved. Namely, state appointed and state paid magistrate
[01:48:04.580 --> 01:48:10.900]  or judge, state appointed and state paid police, state appointed and state paid prosecution
[01:48:10.900 --> 01:48:17.940]  regarding a state matter incorporating state statutes processed in state court. No independent
[01:48:17.940 --> 01:48:23.900]  adjudication as magistrate and judge is acting as judge, jury and executioner. Therefore
[01:48:23.900 --> 01:48:30.300]  there is no separation of powers, no independent jury by peers or by the people. Therefore
[01:48:30.300 --> 01:48:36.540]  a fair and impartial hearing, proceedings and outcome is not only not possible but is
[01:48:36.540 --> 01:48:44.380]  impossible. So that is what we are talking about regarding conflicts of interest.
[01:48:44.380 --> 01:48:50.260]  Do you have that document in a written up form that I can post on the website?
[01:48:50.260 --> 01:48:51.260]  I do.
[01:48:51.260 --> 01:48:52.260]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:48:52.260 --> 01:48:53.260]  Wonderful.
[01:48:53.260 --> 01:48:54.260]  I do.
[01:48:54.260 --> 01:48:59.620]  I'd really like to see that one. That is a good argument to make and I am looking
[01:48:59.620 --> 01:49:08.620]  for all the good arguments we can come up with. The one about the unrebudded affidavit
[01:49:08.620 --> 01:49:18.100]  in listening to you and the actions that we have prepared for foreclosure issues. One
[01:49:18.100 --> 01:49:27.380]  of the biggest things that we have is the other side will do everything it can to keep
[01:49:27.380 --> 01:49:30.100]  from having to answer questions.
[01:49:30.100 --> 01:49:31.100]  Yeah.
[01:49:31.100 --> 01:49:37.340]  We found a suit challenging standing and instead of saying, oh yeah, this is how we have standing
[01:49:37.340 --> 01:49:46.020]  is we are an attorney before we make these assertions, we have a duty to ensure that
[01:49:46.020 --> 01:49:52.180]  our client has the authority to take the action he is asking us to take. So we have
[01:49:52.180 --> 01:50:00.900]  to assume that the lawyer has done his due diligence and has demonstrated or created
[01:50:00.900 --> 01:50:07.500]  proof that his client has standing. So we are asking to produce that standing that he
[01:50:07.500 --> 01:50:15.780]  certainly already has and what I am listening to you, the one thing I didn't have is an
[01:50:15.780 --> 01:50:21.980]  affidavit of fact stating emphatically that he does not have standing and these are the
[01:50:21.980 --> 01:50:22.980]  reasons.
[01:50:22.980 --> 01:50:30.780]  There is plenty of reasons. We just looked at a case last week where a personal friend
[01:50:30.780 --> 01:50:42.620]  of mine went down to see when the lender filed his lien in the county record. Then we went
[01:50:42.620 --> 01:50:49.140]  down and pulled the county record and he never has filed his lien in the county record.
[01:50:49.140 --> 01:50:55.420]  So if they attempt to foreclose and you prepare an affidavit stating that there is no lien
[01:50:55.420 --> 01:51:02.740]  and that's what I haven't been doing. It's just giving the affidavit and forcing them
[01:51:02.740 --> 01:51:10.860]  to rebut it because if it's not rebutted then it must be accepted by the court as fact and
[01:51:10.860 --> 01:51:17.260]  that would give us some re-judgment if they failed to rebut. So that is a very good issue
[01:51:17.260 --> 01:51:21.260]  and a very good point.
[01:51:21.260 --> 01:51:31.780]  Yeah and it's prima facie, if I can pronounce it properly, which is facie. It is based on
[01:51:31.780 --> 01:51:36.100]  first impression accepted as correct until proven otherwise.
[01:51:36.100 --> 01:51:41.100]  On the face of it?
[01:51:41.100 --> 01:51:52.460]  Yes. But in 99% of cases, we know a lot of cases regarding when a state or court, police
[01:51:52.460 --> 01:52:02.340]  or make complaints against you or make, not even complaint statements. It is based on
[01:52:02.340 --> 01:52:09.860]  unsworn testimony and hearsay and that is the key thing because most people start going
[01:52:09.860 --> 01:52:13.540]  in the court and arguing, oh no, I didn't do this, I didn't do that and what he said
[01:52:13.540 --> 01:52:21.580]  is wrong but what he said is not sworn testimony. So why are you even arguing against anything
[01:52:21.580 --> 01:52:27.460]  that there is no commercial private liability to the other party who is accusing you? And
[01:52:27.460 --> 01:52:34.660]  this is why last time when we spoke about, I guided people to the YouTube clip on don't
[01:52:34.660 --> 01:52:40.860]  talk to the police where a law professor actually says to people, whatever you do, keep your
[01:52:40.860 --> 01:52:46.180]  mouth shut. Do not talk to the police because it is what they say. Anything can will be
[01:52:46.180 --> 01:52:53.660]  used against you. It will never be used for you. So instead of you trying to unravel the
[01:52:53.660 --> 01:52:58.900]  situation, you find yourself getting yourself caught up in the web even more by trying
[01:52:58.900 --> 01:53:06.500]  to defend yourself which in fact instead of defending yourself you should be asking them
[01:53:06.500 --> 01:53:11.900]  to prove their claim. And this is when we talked about the affidavit of truth for subpoena
[01:53:11.900 --> 01:53:16.900]  contract which is also available on the website. So here is an affidavit for you to sign that
[01:53:16.900 --> 01:53:23.740]  states that you are not committing offences or contraventions against the law and that
[01:53:23.740 --> 01:53:31.100]  you will provide me certain surities and insurances and costs etc. Should I suffer damages as
[01:53:31.100 --> 01:53:38.940]  a result of your incompetence or inadequacies? And therefore why would anyone refuse to sign
[01:53:38.940 --> 01:53:43.980]  a document, a truth document, an affidavit to say that they are not committing contraventions
[01:53:43.980 --> 01:53:49.780]  or breaking the law in any way and if they do and you suffer damages as a result they
[01:53:49.780 --> 01:53:57.260]  will duly compensate you unless of course they actually are or intended to do the opposite.
[01:53:57.260 --> 01:54:01.660]  Now you are putting them into a very precarious position there because you are calling their
[01:54:01.660 --> 01:54:07.020]  bluff basically. And the biggest presumption and the wrong one that you can make is to
[01:54:07.020 --> 01:54:13.780]  think or believe that police, prosecutors, magistrates, judges actually know the law
[01:54:13.780 --> 01:54:21.300]  because I have and Randy has cross-examined these kind of people under oath and when you
[01:54:21.300 --> 01:54:25.780]  question them about the law you should see the look on their face, looking at the skies,
[01:54:25.780 --> 01:54:31.820]  I don't know and I forgot or I'm not quite sure and they are quite aggressive on the
[01:54:31.820 --> 01:54:36.460]  side of the road or when they were doing it but when you put them on the stand they melt,
[01:54:36.460 --> 01:54:42.380]  they fall to pieces. So they are no different to anyone else out there so don't make the
[01:54:42.380 --> 01:54:48.540]  presumption that they know that they are doing. Break it all down. Ask the tough questions.
[01:54:48.540 --> 01:54:53.020]  Sign this document so that you are not going to commit offences and that is your first
[01:54:53.020 --> 01:54:58.260]  step towards uncovering the big bluff that is out there.
[01:54:58.260 --> 01:55:03.140]  I would like that when you get them to sign a document saying they are not going to commit
[01:55:03.140 --> 01:55:10.260]  offences and you are absolutely right. These guys are amazingly ignorant of law. In the
[01:55:10.260 --> 01:55:18.620]  last case I was there and I put the accuser on the stand and asked him what were the elements
[01:55:18.620 --> 01:55:29.500]  of the crime that he had charged me with and he said, I don't know. Well then what constitutes
[01:55:29.500 --> 01:55:40.100]  a violation of this particular statute? I have no idea. Then why did you file this complaint?
[01:55:40.100 --> 01:55:48.540]  The prosecutor told me to. The prosecutor was one of the ones I had made criminal accusations
[01:55:48.540 --> 01:55:55.140]  against and that is why they were filing the complaints against me because they claimed
[01:55:55.140 --> 01:56:00.540]  I couldn't file them with a grand jury unless I had a private investigator's license and
[01:56:00.540 --> 01:56:07.100]  he testified under oath that he did it because the prosecutor told him to. I mean these guys
[01:56:07.100 --> 01:56:14.540]  are not the sharpest knives in the door. And this is what we are talking about breaking
[01:56:14.540 --> 01:56:22.580]  the presumption, capital B, capital B, breaking the presumptions because the presumption is
[01:56:22.580 --> 01:56:29.980]  this, that and that and you are saying prove your claim.
[01:56:29.980 --> 01:56:35.620]  The gentleman Randy is referring to is Joe Evans and I got to tell you the sharpest thing
[01:56:35.620 --> 01:56:43.860]  about Joe Evans is his breath because it certainly is not his IQ.
[01:56:43.860 --> 01:56:49.420]  Again that is what we are talking about is like again instead of going into the defensive
[01:56:49.420 --> 01:56:56.420]  mode and then you are trying to defend yourself, your best defence is offence. It is to make
[01:56:56.420 --> 01:57:01.500]  sure that whoever is playing the role of who they are supposed to be playing knows what
[01:57:01.500 --> 01:57:07.220]  it is that they are doing and knows the law and breaking the presumptions that they do
[01:57:07.220 --> 01:57:12.660]  because in most cases you will find that they don't. In Australia we have got over 7 million
[01:57:12.660 --> 01:57:18.180]  laws, acts and statutes. Now who in the world knows 7 million laws, acts and statutes let
[01:57:18.180 --> 01:57:22.540]  alone can abide by them. Give me a break.
[01:57:22.540 --> 01:57:28.580]  When I got there I did a seminar in Sydney and I gave these guys some difficulty because
[01:57:28.580 --> 01:57:34.220]  the first thing I did was they were complaining that the registrar wouldn't approve their
[01:57:34.220 --> 01:57:38.500]  criminal appearance notices and the registrar had to look at the notice and make sure it
[01:57:38.500 --> 01:57:43.700]  complied with law so I asked them what is the physical element of a crime and nobody
[01:57:43.700 --> 01:57:49.380]  could answer and according to I think it is a 1995 Crimes Act what is the fault element
[01:57:49.380 --> 01:57:55.100]  that renders a criminal element criminal. Nobody could answer and I chastised them for not
[01:57:55.100 --> 01:58:03.100]  reading the code. But then I pulled out the code. Australia's criminal code is 500 pages
[01:58:03.100 --> 01:58:11.940]  and our criminal code is less than 100. Our section on intoxication of offenses is about
[01:58:11.940 --> 01:58:18.740]  a page and a half. Australia's is 30 pages.
[01:58:18.740 --> 01:58:24.300]  Okay thank you Phil we are running out of time but if you go to Australia and want to
[01:58:24.300 --> 01:58:30.260]  read the law you've got your work cut out for you because it is far more sophisticated
[01:58:30.260 --> 01:58:38.380]  than ours. The thing is it has a long time in development to England. Okay we are out
[01:58:38.380 --> 01:58:43.340]  of time. Thank you for listening. We'll be back Monday with Deborah and Eddie on the
[01:58:43.340 --> 01:58:48.340]  traffic show and then we'll be back again Thursday and Friday. Thank you for listening.
[01:58:48.340 --> 01:59:01.260]  To hear again we'll be back Monday.
[01:59:01.260 --> 01:59:07.340]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:59:07.340 --> 01:59:12.780]  Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:12.780 --> 01:59:18.620]  what the Bible says verse by verse helping you to know God and to know the meaning of
[01:59:18.620 --> 01:59:27.380]  life. Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:27.380 --> 01:59:34.340]  or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over
[01:59:34.340 --> 01:59:41.020]  13000 cross references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:41.020 --> 01:59:45.580]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament
[01:59:45.580 --> 02:00:10.740]  Recovery Version call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.