ROL_2012-01-27_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.000]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[00:05.000 --> 00:09.840]  Russia's electoral commission announced Friday veteran liberal politician Grigory Yolinsky,
[00:09.840 --> 00:13.840]  who has been a presidential candidate three times before, will not be allowed to run against
[00:13.840 --> 00:17.920]  Vladimir Putin in the upcoming March 4 presidential vote.
[00:17.920 --> 00:22.960]  The decision also denies Russia's liberal party from feuding election observers to monitor
[00:22.960 --> 00:23.960]  the voting.
[00:23.960 --> 00:29.080]  Critics say Putin is ensuring no viable independent challengers to the Kremlin's chosen candidate
[00:29.080 --> 00:32.480]  can emerge.
[00:32.480 --> 00:36.440]  Security forces killed 37 people across Syria Friday.
[00:36.440 --> 00:41.720]  As people in homes mourned 14 members of a family, they said were slain by militiamen
[00:41.720 --> 00:46.840]  and one of the worst attacks in the ongoing revolt against President Bashar al-Assad.
[00:46.840 --> 00:52.720]  Meanwhile, the UN Security Council met to discuss Syria before a possible vote next week on
[00:52.720 --> 01:00.080]  a new Western Arab draft resolution aimed at halting 10 months of bloodshed.
[01:00.080 --> 01:05.760]  A U.S. judge ruled Thursday oil giant BP must cover some of the eventual claims against
[01:05.760 --> 01:10.400]  rig owner TransOcean arising from the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
[01:10.400 --> 01:14.760]  The ruling found BP must indemnify the rig operator from compensatory damages related
[01:14.760 --> 01:20.800]  to the 2010 spill, even if the pollution and its impacts are the result of TransOcean's
[01:20.800 --> 01:21.800]  gross negligence.
[01:21.800 --> 01:28.000]  However, BP does not need to cover any punitive damages or civil penalties that may be assessed
[01:28.000 --> 01:30.880]  under the U.S. Clean Water Act.
[01:30.880 --> 01:37.040]  The FBI posted a request for information online last week seeking companies to build a social
[01:37.040 --> 01:39.840]  networking monitoring system for the Bureau.
[01:39.840 --> 01:45.360]  The request details plans to continuously monitor the global output of Facebook, Twitter, and
[01:45.360 --> 01:50.600]  other social networks, offering a rare glimpse into an activity that the FBI and other government
[01:50.600 --> 01:53.480]  agencies are reluctant to discuss publicly.
[01:53.480 --> 01:58.560]  Jennifer Lynch at the Electronic Frontier Foundation says she is worried that the wide
[01:58.560 --> 02:05.480]  net the FBI is casting will have a chilling effect on free speech.
[02:05.480 --> 02:09.800]  In Iraq, at least 32 people were killed Friday, half of them police officers after a suicide
[02:09.800 --> 02:16.040]  bomber detonated a car packed with explosives at a funeral procession in southeastern Baghdad.
[02:16.040 --> 02:19.640]  The blast occurred in a Shia neighborhood where mourners had gathered for the funeral
[02:19.640 --> 02:24.360]  of Mohammed al-Maliki, a real estate agent who was killed along with his wife and son
[02:24.360 --> 02:25.360]  a day earlier.
[02:25.360 --> 02:28.400]  65 people were wounded in the explosion.
[02:28.400 --> 02:33.160]  The attack comes after 17 people were killed in predominantly Sunni areas throughout the
[02:33.160 --> 02:34.160]  nation.
[02:34.160 --> 02:38.360]  Friday's attack brings the death toll from a wave of violence since the beginning of
[02:38.360 --> 02:40.720]  the year to more than 200.
[02:40.720 --> 02:45.520]  The attacks raised concerns that the surge in violence and an escalating political crisis
[02:45.520 --> 02:50.600]  might deteriorate into a civil war, sectarian violence killed tens of thousands of Iraqis
[02:50.600 --> 03:19.720]  at the peak of the Iraq war in 2006 through 2007.
[03:20.600 --> 03:44.720]  I received my remedy today, came in the box just like they say, I accepted for value right
[03:44.720 --> 03:45.720]  away.
[03:45.720 --> 03:59.160]  Okay, we're back to Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig with the radio, talking
[03:59.160 --> 04:00.160]  to David in Illinois.
[04:00.160 --> 04:05.160]  David, you have one more issue we wanted to address.
[04:05.160 --> 04:16.920]  Yeah, when you were talking about being a third-party intervener, aren't you, when
[04:16.920 --> 04:23.920]  you go to court, actually a third-party intervener under injury?
[04:23.920 --> 04:26.960]  I don't know what you're talking about.
[04:26.960 --> 04:38.000]  A third-party intervener on your injury, there's some depth, you're presuming that I'm not
[04:38.000 --> 04:39.000]  aware of.
[04:39.000 --> 04:43.760]  Who's the first party, who's the second party?
[04:43.760 --> 04:47.440]  The first party would be the state, second party would be the fiction, and you're the
[04:47.440 --> 04:48.440]  third party.
[04:48.440 --> 04:51.640]  Wait, the third, second party is who?
[04:51.640 --> 04:56.440]  The fiction of law.
[04:56.440 --> 05:01.080]  What means fiction of law?
[05:01.080 --> 05:06.240]  Like a corporation or an entity created by law.
[05:06.240 --> 05:09.920]  Would that be the court is not that fiction?
[05:09.920 --> 05:16.000]  Well, there's that, yeah, because the court is also a fiction as well.
[05:16.000 --> 05:21.800]  Okay, I don't know what you're talking about here, I don't know what distinctions you're
[05:21.800 --> 05:22.800]  making.
[05:22.800 --> 05:34.200]  That the person is some sort of fiction of law, is that not correct, it's a creation
[05:34.200 --> 05:35.200]  of law.
[05:35.200 --> 05:38.200]  It can be.
[05:38.200 --> 05:40.200]  Okay.
[05:40.200 --> 05:48.280]  If it's you, if you're a living soul coming in as a person, no, because that's in the definition
[05:48.280 --> 05:56.280]  of person as well, but it can be a living soul, it can be a fiction of law, corporation,
[05:56.280 --> 05:58.280]  a trust.
[05:58.280 --> 05:59.280]  Okay.
[05:59.280 --> 06:00.280]  Okay.
[06:00.280 --> 06:04.760]  I'd say that you're just the injured party.
[06:04.760 --> 06:10.080]  You're always the injured party, but if you do go in the court and I emphasise, do anything
[06:10.080 --> 06:18.200]  that you can to stay away from those places, because they're not your friend by any means.
[06:18.200 --> 06:22.920]  But you go in there as the injured party and as the plaintiff.
[06:22.920 --> 06:28.400]  When I go in the court, I don't want to be a defendant, I want to be a plaintiff, and
[06:28.400 --> 06:32.760]  I want to have evidence of injury, and I want to hold a claim in my hand.
[06:32.760 --> 06:33.760]  Right.
[06:33.760 --> 06:34.760]  Okay.
[06:34.760 --> 06:35.760]  Yep.
[06:35.760 --> 06:36.760]  And that's all I was getting at.
[06:36.760 --> 06:40.240]  So I'll get off and let you guys get to the other callers, but yeah, that was kind
[06:40.240 --> 06:45.840]  of my whole point was to be on that side of it, to be that you be the injured party
[06:45.840 --> 06:51.280]  and be in a plaintiff position, because then the defendant, from my understanding, is always
[06:51.280 --> 06:53.600]  the subject of the plaintiff.
[06:53.600 --> 06:54.600]  Yeah.
[06:54.600 --> 06:56.600]  And that's exactly right.
[06:56.600 --> 06:57.600]  Whatever.
[06:57.600 --> 07:01.920]  If you do go to court, if you do choose to go to court, go as the plaintiff, which is holding
[07:01.920 --> 07:08.480]  the claim in your hand, so that you, then you are the one that can be awarded judgement.
[07:08.480 --> 07:17.160]  So you can, from the plaintiff's point of view, you can only walk away with what you
[07:17.160 --> 07:23.880]  had or a reward, right, because really you've got nothing to lose as a plaintiff if you've
[07:23.880 --> 07:26.520]  got a valid claim, right.
[07:26.520 --> 07:32.480]  If you're a defendant, even if you win, the only thing that you walk away with is what
[07:32.480 --> 07:39.080]  you already had to begin with minus a lot of your time and expenses.
[07:39.080 --> 07:43.920]  So always, if you can, always go to court as a plaintiff, always turn it around, be
[07:43.920 --> 07:49.720]  the accuser, be the plaintiff, and it's been nice talking with you and thank you for calling
[07:49.720 --> 07:50.720]  in.
[07:50.720 --> 07:51.720]  Yep.
[07:51.720 --> 07:52.720]  Okay.
[07:52.720 --> 07:53.720]  Thank you, David.
[07:53.720 --> 07:57.600]  And I didn't mean to be a stickler, I'm just careful about definitions, I want to make
[07:57.600 --> 08:04.360]  sure I understand, and as I get older, I've learned not to just assume that I understand
[08:04.360 --> 08:10.520]  something without questioning it further, because I have talked about subjects with
[08:10.520 --> 08:17.240]  people and we were both using words and thought we understood what they meant, and maybe one
[08:17.240 --> 08:19.440]  of us actually had a clue.
[08:19.440 --> 08:20.440]  Yeah.
[08:20.440 --> 08:24.440]  Always good to look up definitions of words, yeah.
[08:24.440 --> 08:25.440]  Okay, guys.
[08:25.440 --> 08:26.440]  Okay.
[08:26.440 --> 08:27.440]  Thank you, David.
[08:27.440 --> 08:29.680]  And now we're going to go to Julius.
[08:29.680 --> 08:36.360]  Julius, I know you're going to cause some trouble, what do you have for us today?
[08:36.360 --> 08:42.720]  First of all, I'm in a Dunkin' Donuts parking lot, so you know I'm going to cause trouble.
[08:42.720 --> 08:46.720]  Maybe this time we'll get to hear you beaten into unconsciousness.
[08:46.720 --> 08:47.720]  Absolutely.
[08:47.720 --> 08:55.320]  I have a question for Phil, actually, and I would love to know where I can get some
[08:55.320 --> 09:00.680]  of that information and act accordingly to turn this around and become a plaintiff, but
[09:00.680 --> 09:06.560]  I think I was discussing my case a little bit last time Phil was on the program, and
[09:06.560 --> 09:12.680]  it was about a traffic citation of impeding traffic.
[09:12.680 --> 09:22.040]  And I think I have two claims that deal with conflict of interest, one being the judge
[09:22.040 --> 09:29.680]  as Phil had recommended, but then also the officer giving the citation in the beginning
[09:29.680 --> 09:36.640]  was actually working for this W building here downtown, a hotel, in a conflict of interest
[09:36.640 --> 09:42.480]  because he's getting paid by that building and was told by those valet managers to get
[09:42.480 --> 09:46.360]  rid of me at any cost, any reason, get rid of this guy.
[09:46.360 --> 09:52.760]  That's what they went and told the cop, and he come over and gave me some bogus citation
[09:52.760 --> 09:59.400]  about impeding traffic, but he didn't even give me the citation, he gave me a warning.
[09:59.400 --> 10:03.960]  He said, well, you're not supposed to be here, I said, well, how's that so?
[10:03.960 --> 10:07.480]  There's taxis standing up here, I'm in a public spot on a public road.
[10:07.480 --> 10:10.600]  He said, well, do you have a license to be a taxi driver?
[10:10.600 --> 10:11.600]  I said, no.
[10:11.600 --> 10:17.880]  Of course, he never asked me if I was a licensed chauffeur, which I am, and I'm driving a charter
[10:17.880 --> 10:18.880]  van.
[10:18.880 --> 10:22.760]  I have every right as much as the taxis to be there or privilege, whatever you want to
[10:22.760 --> 10:25.760]  call it.
[10:25.760 --> 10:33.000]  So I said to him, well, okay, so I don't have a taxi driver's license, so okay, well, you
[10:33.000 --> 10:37.240]  need to move on because you're a pocket traffic, you're a peaking traffic, I said, well, wait
[10:37.240 --> 10:40.120]  a minute, how come the taxis are allowed to be here?
[10:40.120 --> 10:45.600]  He says, well, the taxis have proper permits, and I said, oh, really, it's just so now get
[10:45.600 --> 10:46.600]  going, right?
[10:46.600 --> 10:52.760]  And he says, okay, I'll get going, I'll leave, but we're in the rule book, and before I can
[10:52.760 --> 10:57.040]  even get out another word, I said, we're in the rule book, I was going to say, we're in
[10:57.040 --> 11:03.520]  the rule book, can I find this impeding traffic or see what violation that I'm violating
[11:03.520 --> 11:10.680]  or law, or et cetera, so that I can see what I might be doing wrong, and maybe I won't
[11:10.680 --> 11:11.680]  come.
[11:11.680 --> 11:17.400]  Maybe not, okay, if I'm doing this wrong, well, let's see what it is.
[11:17.400 --> 11:24.720]  And he says, license, registration, insurance, okay, you know, I said, well, so what does
[11:24.720 --> 11:25.720]  this mean?
[11:25.720 --> 11:26.720]  You're going to give me a ticket?
[11:26.720 --> 11:32.480]  He goes, I'm going to show you with the law, I said, oh, really, so by giving me a ticket,
[11:32.480 --> 11:36.120]  you're going to show me with the law, because that's right, I'm giving you a ticket to go
[11:36.120 --> 11:39.200]  down and appear, you know, before the municipal court.
[11:39.200 --> 11:47.040]  Did not read me any of my rights whatsoever, but told me to sign the citation, and I said,
[11:47.040 --> 11:55.680]  okay, I guess I'm going to sign the citation, he goes, it's not a plea of guilty, it's only
[11:55.680 --> 12:01.600]  a promise to appear at the city of Austin Municipal Court, he says, okay, I'll promise
[12:01.600 --> 12:09.280]  to appear at the municipal court outside it, I signed this promise to appear, but the officer
[12:09.280 --> 12:16.720]  never disclosed on the citation that sneaky, in a box above your signature, that it says
[12:16.720 --> 12:26.600]  on the citation that I promise to appear for the purpose of entering a plea of guilty,
[12:26.600 --> 12:32.360]  not guilty, or pleading no contest and this kind of stuff.
[12:32.360 --> 12:41.240]  Now what I had noticed was that was a box that is blocked out by a black ink, and I
[12:41.240 --> 12:47.600]  did not sign in that box, I signed below the box, I was only signing his promise to appear,
[12:47.600 --> 12:54.720]  when he disclosed to me, this is not a plea of guilty, it's only a promise to appear,
[12:54.720 --> 13:00.360]  then okay, I promise to appear, and I did so, and I appeared at the court, now that's
[13:00.360 --> 13:06.640]  a whole other story we can get into there, but the court is sort of claiming, as Eddie
[13:06.640 --> 13:11.720]  can jump in on this, because this kind of ties in with what Eddie was talking about
[13:11.720 --> 13:18.440]  last night, and how the courts are trying to trick us into signing away our right to
[13:18.440 --> 13:29.280]  due process, by signing the citation, that I have my people on, I think you got distracted,
[13:29.280 --> 13:38.880]  you had a question for Phil, yes, could you hear me, yeah I can hear you, you had a question
[13:38.880 --> 13:42.640]  for Phil, we never got to hear you, yeah we're still waiting for the question to come out
[13:42.640 --> 13:52.080]  of all this, okay, if you sign the citation, and under the cop talking to you while you
[13:52.080 --> 14:00.800]  have a voice recorder on, when he says, sign this citation, it's only a promise to appear,
[14:00.800 --> 14:08.840]  then is that your contract, even though you signed this citation, no, yes, no it's not,
[14:08.840 --> 14:15.320]  the written contract will supersede anything out of that cop's mouth, guaranteed, absolutely
[14:15.320 --> 14:26.800]  does not, if you have, okay, this is in the case law, go to Gettioil, largest settlement
[14:26.800 --> 14:35.720]  in history before the Exxon Valdez, went to exactly that, they said one thing, they wrote
[14:35.720 --> 14:42.880]  something else, what they said, amended the written contract, that policeman amended the
[14:42.880 --> 14:52.160]  written contract, can I make a quote on that, yes, anything that I sign, or that I don't
[14:52.160 --> 14:58.200]  really wish to sign, but you kind of have to sign, I always sign it under protest NGRS,
[14:58.200 --> 15:02.920]  which eliminates any promise, yeah, and these guys, the police here now get real excited
[15:02.920 --> 15:13.240]  when you do that, good, because that also indicates that they forced your performance,
[15:13.240 --> 15:18.000]  now I said sure, I'll sign it, I'll sign under protest NGRS, and I said signature, signed
[15:18.000 --> 15:23.760]  under protest NGRS, here's my infringement notice to you now, power, for forcing my unpaid
[15:23.760 --> 15:35.360]  involuntary performance and servitude, and that is a good point about the contract, if
[15:35.360 --> 15:40.760]  he has you sign a contract, and he tells, he represents to you that the contract only
[15:40.760 --> 15:51.360]  compels you to do one thing, when in fact it compels you to do two things, that is,
[15:51.360 --> 15:58.840]  applied by non-disclosure, no, that's not applied by non-disclosure, what is that, that's downright
[15:58.840 --> 16:07.600]  deception, well it's deception, but again, you say, I don't agree, are you forcing me,
[16:07.600 --> 16:11.240]  where's the law that says that you can compel my unpaid involuntary performance, where's
[16:11.240 --> 16:17.840]  the evidence of injury, harm, damages or loss, but by saying that, knowing your rights and
[16:17.840 --> 16:22.680]  how to invoke them is one thing, but I don't advocate that you go and be a public nuisance
[16:22.680 --> 16:29.200]  and you go looking for trouble either, you know, so this whole case being in a parking
[16:29.200 --> 16:34.640]  lot, whatever sounds a little bit trivial to me, but I don't say go and be a public
[16:34.640 --> 16:39.920]  nuisance or this and that, but yeah sure, have some protections in you, know the laws,
[16:39.920 --> 16:48.360]  have some, look at these documents that is available now on AussieLaw.com and use them
[16:48.360 --> 16:49.360]  in the right circumstances, quick to your attention.
[16:49.360 --> 16:53.360]  Okay, okay, hold on, hold on, we'll be right, this is Brady Cowden, Brady Stevens, Eddie
[16:53.360 --> 16:58.360]  Craig, we've got the radio, we'll be right back on the other side.
[16:58.360 --> 17:06.160]  One is a serial hypocrite who lobbied for Freddie Mac before the housing crisis and
[17:06.160 --> 17:12.600]  for the individual mandate before Obamacare, another a counterfeit conservative who opposes
[17:12.600 --> 17:18.440]  right to work, massively increased spending and funded Planned Parenthood, finally, a
[17:18.440 --> 17:24.160]  flip flopper who's been on all sides, supported tarp bailouts and provided the blueprint for
[17:24.160 --> 17:32.720]  Obamacare, three men, one vision, more big governments, more mandates, less freedom.
[17:32.720 --> 17:39.480]  One man stands apart, ready to deliver real change, voting against every tax increase
[17:39.480 --> 17:45.600]  and every unbalanced budget every time, a real plan to cut a trillion dollars year
[17:45.600 --> 17:53.160]  one and to balance the budget in three, pro-life, pro-right to work, guided by faith and principle,
[17:53.160 --> 17:57.960]  Ron Paul, the one who will restore America now.
[17:57.960 --> 18:00.640]  I'm Ron Paul and I approve this message.
[18:00.640 --> 18:05.960]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses?
[18:05.960 --> 18:09.600]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[18:09.600 --> 18:13.760]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.760 --> 18:14.760]  can win two.
[18:14.760 --> 18:19.600]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.600 --> 18:25.360]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.360 --> 18:29.960]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[18:29.960 --> 18:34.160]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.160 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.440]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.440 --> 18:46.960]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[18:46.960 --> 18:49.840]  or email Michael Mearris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.840 --> 18:57.640]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.640 --> 19:00.640]  To learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:27.640 --> 19:33.640]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[19:33.640 --> 19:59.640]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to win
[19:59.640 --> 20:06.640]  in court.
[20:29.640 --> 20:57.640]  Okay, we're back.
[20:57.640 --> 21:21.200]  I think the next time I want to hand them the affidavit of truth bill style, I mean I
[21:21.200 --> 21:26.200]  I really love that, Phil. I appreciate it, and I would love to do that in Texas.
[21:26.200 --> 21:31.200]  Go to RCLAW.net.
[21:31.200 --> 21:33.200]  RCLAW.net, okay.
[21:33.200 --> 21:41.200]  Yeah, and there's a link to these documents right on the front page, left-hand side under Queensland.
[21:41.200 --> 21:47.200]  The AUSSIE, law.net.
[21:47.200 --> 21:54.200]  Okay, thank you, Phil. I really appreciate that. I love your perspective on that because let's turn the tables here,
[21:54.200 --> 22:00.200]  because that's, in fact, what it is. I'm not going to contract with you unless you first contract with me.
[22:00.200 --> 22:06.200]  Show me who you are, identify yourself, and then maybe we can do business.
[22:06.200 --> 22:09.200]  First, you have to agree to my terms.
[22:09.200 --> 22:14.200]  That's right, or you're enslaving me, and he's my notice to you.
[22:14.200 --> 22:20.200]  But I'm not bothering you. You came and bothered me, so therefore, you must contract with me first.
[22:20.200 --> 22:26.200]  And if he goes, no, I need you to sign the citation. No, it's not going to happen. I won't even sign anything.
[22:26.200 --> 22:28.200]  I'm not signing anything.
[22:28.200 --> 22:36.200]  Okay, Julius, go see if you can find some security guards to annoy.
[22:36.200 --> 22:39.200]  And then call us so we can listen.
[22:39.200 --> 22:42.200]  Okay, thank you, Julius.
[22:42.200 --> 22:48.200]  We're going to go to Audrey in Texas. Audrey, what do you have for us?
[22:48.200 --> 22:53.200]  Hi, I have a question about a traffic citation.
[22:53.200 --> 23:02.200]  I received a traffic citation for not having the correct or up-to-date address on my driver's license.
[23:02.200 --> 23:14.200]  I moved from Texas to California the day after I received my citation, and I went online, purchased my new Texas driver's license with my correct address on it.
[23:14.200 --> 23:25.200]  In fact, the Travis County, the copy of my receipt, they said they did not receive my receipt, so I emailed it to them.
[23:25.200 --> 23:42.200]  In an interim, they put out two warrants for my arrest, one for failure to appear in court, and the second one for the original offense of not having an up-to-date address on my driver's license.
[23:42.200 --> 24:00.200]  I told them that I was in California and could not appear in court, but I had my receipt for the purchase of my driver's license. They said that I would have to post a bond of $1,018 before they would even talk to me about my case.
[24:00.200 --> 24:02.200]  Who said that?
[24:02.200 --> 24:09.200]  The court, the county clerk at Lakeway.
[24:09.200 --> 24:16.200]  Okay. And how did the county court clerk wind up with jurisdiction of the alleged offense?
[24:16.200 --> 24:18.200]  I don't know. They won't even...
[24:18.200 --> 24:20.200]  You said this was a traffic ticket, right?
[24:20.200 --> 24:24.200]  It was a traffic ticket in Lakeway.
[24:24.200 --> 24:32.200]  That certainly would not be going to the county court unless they mean the justice court.
[24:32.200 --> 24:35.200]  What court did the ticket tell you to appear in?
[24:35.200 --> 24:45.200]  Two arrest warrants out for my arrest, and when I called to speak with them and I faxed and emailed them my receipt for purchasing my new driver's license.
[24:45.200 --> 24:51.200]  Well, wait a minute. I'll just hang on just a second. I'm trying to get some specific set of facts up here so I know what I'm dealing with.
[24:51.200 --> 24:52.200]  Okay.
[24:52.200 --> 24:55.200]  Two, Lakeway Police Department issued the ticket, right?
[24:55.200 --> 24:56.200]  Yes.
[24:56.200 --> 25:02.200]  Okay, so it's a city-issued ticket, which means they most likely directed you to the municipal court.
[25:02.200 --> 25:03.200]  Okay.
[25:03.200 --> 25:10.200]  Does the ticket and the information they gave you with it stipulate what court you're to appear in?
[25:10.200 --> 25:12.200]  Yes, and it's Lakeway.
[25:12.200 --> 25:14.200]  Lakeway what?
[25:14.200 --> 25:21.200]  The Lakeway court. There's whatever court system Lakeway uses, which is the zone.
[25:21.200 --> 25:26.200]  Okay. Well, I need to know if it's a county court or the municipal court.
[25:26.200 --> 25:27.200]  The municipal court.
[25:27.200 --> 25:30.200]  If it's specifically the city of Lakeway, it should be the municipal court.
[25:30.200 --> 25:32.200]  It's the municipal court.
[25:32.200 --> 25:37.200]  Okay, then where is the county clerk getting off telling you what the amount of anything is?
[25:37.200 --> 25:40.200]  I don't know. That's my question.
[25:40.200 --> 25:46.200]  Why do I have Travis County telling me that I have to pay a bond?
[25:46.200 --> 25:54.200]  I either have to pay a security bond or I have to go in person, turn myself in, and then get...
[25:54.200 --> 25:55.200]  Okay.
[25:55.200 --> 25:59.200]  The original receipt, how did you send it in to Lakeway?
[25:59.200 --> 26:04.200]  I faxed it to them and when I called them and they said they did not receive it.
[26:04.200 --> 26:07.200]  Did you keep the fax confirmation sheet?
[26:07.200 --> 26:09.200]  I did.
[26:09.200 --> 26:11.200]  Good. Don't lose that.
[26:11.200 --> 26:12.200]  Okay.
[26:12.200 --> 26:13.200]  Okay.
[26:13.200 --> 26:17.200]  The one thing you need to make sure you do, however, is verify the fax number.
[26:17.200 --> 26:22.200]  Call down there and say, is this the correct fax number?
[26:22.200 --> 26:27.200]  Get the name of whoever it is you ask that question to and who responds to it.
[26:27.200 --> 26:29.200]  I did that.
[26:29.200 --> 26:31.200]  Okay.
[26:31.200 --> 26:37.200]  It was one of their clerks, one of their clerks at their municipal court.
[26:37.200 --> 26:39.200]  I spoke to her.
[26:39.200 --> 26:41.200]  And she confirmed the fax number is correct?
[26:41.200 --> 26:43.200]  She did.
[26:43.200 --> 26:44.200]  Okay.
[26:44.200 --> 26:46.200]  You wrote her name down.
[26:46.200 --> 26:48.200]  I did write her name down.
[26:48.200 --> 26:49.200]  Okay.
[26:49.200 --> 26:51.200]  And she sent me to email my receipt.
[26:51.200 --> 26:58.200]  So I emailed my receipt to her and to one of the officers also in the Lakeway court.
[26:58.200 --> 27:04.200]  I emailed my receipt and the response was, we will not discuss your case with you until
[27:04.200 --> 27:12.200]  you post bond and get a court appearance on our docket.
[27:12.200 --> 27:17.200]  That just doesn't seem right to me when I paid my $11 for my driver's license.
[27:17.200 --> 27:22.200]  They sent them the receipt and they're telling me they won't even discuss it with me until
[27:22.200 --> 27:25.200]  I post a $1,018 bond.
[27:25.200 --> 27:31.200]  They want your money in their hands so they can use it until they decide to give it back
[27:31.200 --> 27:33.200]  to you if they ever do.
[27:33.200 --> 27:35.200]  And put me in the system.
[27:35.200 --> 27:38.200]  Something like that, yes.
[27:38.200 --> 27:41.200]  Now, do you have a copy of the citation?
[27:41.200 --> 27:44.200]  I do have a copy of the citation.
[27:44.200 --> 27:47.200]  And how many pages is the citation?
[27:47.200 --> 27:48.200]  Two.
[27:48.200 --> 27:49.200]  Two.
[27:49.200 --> 27:52.200]  Front and back or two separate pages?
[27:52.200 --> 27:54.200]  Front and back.
[27:54.200 --> 27:55.200]  Okay.
[27:55.200 --> 27:57.200]  Is it printed on the electronic pad?
[27:57.200 --> 27:58.200]  Yes.
[27:58.200 --> 28:00.200]  Or is it a paper ticket?
[28:00.200 --> 28:01.200]  Yes.
[28:01.200 --> 28:04.200]  But it can't be yes to both.
[28:04.200 --> 28:09.200]  It's either one that's been printed out of one of their electronic pads or it's a carbon
[28:09.200 --> 28:11.200]  copy from a ticket book.
[28:11.200 --> 28:12.200]  Which is it?
[28:12.200 --> 28:14.200]  It was the first one.
[28:14.200 --> 28:16.200]  It was printed out from their electronic pad.
[28:16.200 --> 28:17.200]  Okay.
[28:17.200 --> 28:22.200]  I need you to scan in a copy of that ticket front and back and email that to me.
[28:22.200 --> 28:24.200]  I will.
[28:24.200 --> 28:25.200]  Okay.
[28:25.200 --> 28:29.200]  And make sure I can read everything on it clearly and try to make sure it's oriented
[28:29.200 --> 28:30.200]  the correct way.
[28:30.200 --> 28:32.200]  Don't send it to me scan upside down and stuff.
[28:32.200 --> 28:35.200]  That's a pain in the butt to flip over and get corrected.
[28:35.200 --> 28:38.200]  But scan it in front and back and email that to me.
[28:38.200 --> 28:42.200]  And I'll go over it real quick and I'll send you back some information regarding the ticket.
[28:42.200 --> 28:49.200]  If it's like 99% of the tickets being issued in Austin and Lakeway and Flugerville and
[28:49.200 --> 28:55.200]  everywhere else, the ticket itself is absolutely illegal because it violates Texas law.
[28:55.200 --> 28:56.200]  Okay.
[28:56.200 --> 28:58.200]  But I need to see it to make sure.
[28:58.200 --> 28:59.200]  Okay.
[28:59.200 --> 29:01.200]  And what is your email?
[29:01.200 --> 29:08.200]  My email is eddyedde at ruleoflawradio.com.
[29:08.200 --> 29:09.200]  Okay.
[29:09.200 --> 29:11.200]  I will do that.
[29:11.200 --> 29:12.200]  Thank you.
[29:12.200 --> 29:13.200]  All right.
[29:13.200 --> 29:14.200]  I appreciate it.
[29:14.200 --> 29:15.200]  Yes, ma'am.
[29:15.200 --> 29:16.200]  All right.
[29:16.200 --> 29:17.200]  Have a good night.
[29:17.200 --> 29:18.200]  You too.
[29:18.200 --> 29:19.200]  Thanks for calling in.
[29:19.200 --> 29:20.200]  Thanks.
[29:20.200 --> 29:21.200]  All right.
[29:21.200 --> 29:24.200]  We have about 40 seconds left before we go to break.
[29:24.200 --> 29:27.200]  Randy, do you want to take Earl on the other side?
[29:27.200 --> 29:29.200]  Do you want to get him started now?
[29:29.200 --> 29:31.200]  No, we won't have time on this side.
[29:31.200 --> 29:33.200]  We'll pick him up on the other side.
[29:33.200 --> 29:37.200]  Earl, I hope you have read that the habeas corpus.
[29:37.200 --> 29:40.200]  So we'll be ready to take these guys on.
[29:40.200 --> 29:43.200]  This is Randy Kalkin, Debussy, and Craig.
[29:43.200 --> 29:45.200]  Rule of Law Radio.
[29:45.200 --> 29:49.200]  Our call in number is 512-646-1984.
[29:49.200 --> 29:50.200]  Give us a call.
[29:50.200 --> 30:00.200]  If you have a question or comment, we'll be right back on the other side.
[30:00.200 --> 30:05.200]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[30:05.200 --> 30:07.200]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:07.200 --> 30:12.200]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:12.200 --> 30:15.200]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:15.200 --> 30:18.200]  And thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[30:18.200 --> 30:20.200]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:20.200 --> 30:21.200]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:21.200 --> 30:22.200]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[30:22.200 --> 30:23.200]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:23.200 --> 30:25.200]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:25.200 --> 30:26.200]  We're Americans.
[30:26.200 --> 30:27.200]  And we deserve the truth.
[30:27.200 --> 30:49.200]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:58.200 --> 31:00.200]  So protect your rights.
[31:00.200 --> 31:04.200]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[31:04.200 --> 31:05.200]  Privacy.
[31:05.200 --> 31:06.200]  It's worth hanging on to.
[31:06.200 --> 31:13.200]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[31:13.200 --> 31:17.200]  Start over with StartPage.
[31:17.200 --> 31:22.200]  Imagine you're coming home from work when you see someone lugging a huge TV down the sidewalk.
[31:22.200 --> 31:25.200]  Would you pity the guy and help out or would you drive on past?
[31:25.200 --> 31:32.200]  One Delaware Good Samaritan did the right thing when he lent a hand to a stranger struggling to carry a flat screen TV.
[31:32.200 --> 31:34.200]  Then he noticed this.
[31:34.200 --> 31:37.200]  The door of his house was ajar and the television was his.
[31:37.200 --> 31:39.200]  Picture the scene.
[31:39.200 --> 31:41.200]  Thief and victim lock stairs.
[31:41.200 --> 31:43.200]  Thief dumps the TV in bolts.
[31:43.200 --> 31:46.200]  Victim chases thief dialing 911 on his cell phone.
[31:46.200 --> 31:50.200]  Police respond quickly and nab the thief and his getaway driver.
[31:50.200 --> 31:51.200]  The moral to the story?
[31:51.200 --> 31:52.200]  Lend a hand.
[31:52.200 --> 31:54.200]  Some good might come of it.
[31:54.200 --> 31:59.200]  I'm Dr. Katharine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[32:24.200 --> 32:40.200]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[32:40.200 --> 32:44.200]  Call in number is 512-646-1984.
[32:44.200 --> 32:47.200]  We got about an hour and a half left in the show.
[32:47.200 --> 32:52.200]  So please get in line if you got a question, query, or issue that you need an answer to.
[32:52.200 --> 32:56.200]  Because you won't hear from us again until Monday night on The Traffic Show.
[32:56.200 --> 32:59.200]  Right now we're going to go to Earl and Wisconsin.
[32:59.200 --> 33:01.200]  Earl, what can we do for you?
[33:01.200 --> 33:09.200]  Well, I got just a couple of quick questions for a fellow from Australia.
[33:09.200 --> 33:17.200]  I was wondering, you said there were three things you go to court for.
[33:17.200 --> 33:22.200]  To face my accuser, question my accuser and there was one other.
[33:22.200 --> 33:24.200]  Test the evidence.
[33:24.200 --> 33:27.200]  Test the evidence, okay.
[33:27.200 --> 33:39.200]  And the other one was, you gave your corporate name a capitalist maximum.
[33:39.200 --> 33:48.200]  I wanted to check into that. I've just been learning about your corporate entity.
[33:48.200 --> 33:51.200]  Oh, it's Capitus Dominio Maxima.
[33:51.200 --> 33:57.200]  If you have a look at it, Capitus Dominio Maxima, it's the capitalization of a name.
[33:57.200 --> 34:07.200]  Or it's referred to in Law Dictionary as the maximum loss of status when a free man became a slave.
[34:07.200 --> 34:14.200]  Or also referred to as dead entities as on gravestones and captured vessels.
[34:14.200 --> 34:18.200]  Okay, wow, okay.
[34:18.200 --> 34:23.200]  I didn't get a chance to go to your...
[34:23.200 --> 34:26.200]  Well, this was for...
[34:26.200 --> 34:32.200]  I think that was the only two things for you, sir.
[34:32.200 --> 34:35.200]  Okay, you didn't get to the Riddleheadness Corpus?
[34:35.200 --> 34:42.200]  I didn't on your website, but what I did do today, sir, I had to go to Madison.
[34:42.200 --> 34:50.200]  I went to a used bookstore and I picked up a Black Swah's dictionary and I looked it up in there.
[34:50.200 --> 34:59.200]  And I didn't realize how many different Habes things were attached to Habes's Corpus.
[34:59.200 --> 35:06.200]  Okay, if you look at that document, that document is written as a Habes Corpus.
[35:06.200 --> 35:08.200]  It's only about 50 pages.
[35:08.200 --> 35:11.200]  Oh, okay, okay.
[35:11.200 --> 35:18.200]  But it is much, much longer than a Habes school normally be.
[35:18.200 --> 35:23.200]  But it intentionally tracks due process from beginning to end.
[35:23.200 --> 35:33.200]  And that is about the shortest dissertation of that subject you'll ever come across to be somewhat complete.
[35:33.200 --> 35:34.200]  Okay.
[35:34.200 --> 35:40.200]  It would need to be converted into Wisconsin law, but that should not be difficult at all.
[35:40.200 --> 35:50.200]  Okay, if you're going to get a Black Swah dictionary, try and get the earlier versions, like say the fourth edition and maybe earlier.
[35:50.200 --> 36:02.200]  The new editions are like the latest ones have some of the meanings and of the words have been quite doctored and changed.
[36:02.200 --> 36:09.200]  So the earlier versions are the much better versions to have like the fourth edition and earlier.
[36:09.200 --> 36:23.200]  When I was there, they had a fourth edition and an eighth edition, which is a 2004. And my wife encouraged me to buy the newer edition, of course, because it's updated.
[36:23.200 --> 36:25.200]  Nice.
[36:25.200 --> 36:26.200]  If you want to make sure...
[36:26.200 --> 36:28.200]  Yeah, it's updated a long way.
[36:28.200 --> 36:29.200]  Yeah.
[36:29.200 --> 36:37.200]  If you want to have a look at something that's really interesting, have a look at the legal definition of free in the fourth edition.
[36:37.200 --> 36:42.200]  And then have a look at the legal definition of free in the eighth edition.
[36:42.200 --> 36:46.200]  It is completely the opposite.
[36:46.200 --> 36:48.200]  Oh, okay.
[36:48.200 --> 36:50.200]  Yeah, completely the opposite.
[36:50.200 --> 36:56.200]  And it will go, oh my God, what are these people doing?
[36:56.200 --> 37:09.200]  But again, you know, it goes back to point of origin because it's just like, you know, that's why they say jurisdiction, like old laws have jurisdiction over new laws because new laws couldn't be created if there weren't old laws.
[37:09.200 --> 37:13.200]  So same goes with the law dictionary.
[37:13.200 --> 37:18.200]  The old ones have jurisdiction over the new ones because there couldn't be any new ones without the old ones.
[37:18.200 --> 37:24.200]  So the old ones disqualify any inconsistency or conflict with new versions.
[37:24.200 --> 37:27.200]  So the older versions are always better to have.
[37:27.200 --> 37:28.200]  Okay.
[37:28.200 --> 37:30.200]  Well, I really appreciate that tip.
[37:30.200 --> 37:39.200]  Now, a lot of this information that I've been hearing from you tonight, I can get most of that from that Aussielaw.net.
[37:39.200 --> 37:42.200]  Oh, there's documents are on there.
[37:42.200 --> 37:56.200]  Well, when people listen into the show, I encourage them to have a notepad or even, you know, a dictaphone so that they can record specific things that might be relevant or things that maybe is useful.
[37:56.200 --> 38:05.200]  But I do believe that you can actually tune into the website where this program is recorded and you can hear it again if you like.
[38:05.200 --> 38:06.200]  Is that true, Randy?
[38:06.200 --> 38:11.200]  Yes, you can go to ruleoflawradio.com.
[38:11.200 --> 38:13.200]  And all of our programs are archived.
[38:13.200 --> 38:17.200]  You can pull down the archives and listen to them over and over.
[38:17.200 --> 38:24.200]  The show I did last night, I did it as an archive.
[38:24.200 --> 38:37.200]  I went through the American Bar Association standards for the prosecutorial function and just walked right through them so that they would be in the archive and you could pull it down and listen to it over and over and it kind of sinks in that way.
[38:37.200 --> 38:43.200]  So yeah, absolutely all of our shows are archived and we can pull it down and listen to it.
[38:43.200 --> 38:49.200]  It's wonderful because I've been taking notes, but I'm not a real fast writer.
[38:49.200 --> 38:52.200]  I was in a Marine Corps, right?
[38:52.200 --> 38:55.200]  Oh, you had Jarhead.
[38:55.200 --> 38:57.200]  That explains it.
[38:57.200 --> 39:05.200]  Army means aren't really Marines yet.
[39:05.200 --> 39:13.200]  I was in the Air Force and we used to discuss what do they do to these Marines.
[39:13.200 --> 39:19.200]  I worked in the runway and Air Force pilots never tried to kill us.
[39:19.200 --> 39:23.200]  Marine pilots always tried to kill us.
[39:23.200 --> 39:25.200]  It was the food.
[39:25.200 --> 39:39.200]  Well, sir, I have one of your, this is Verrandi, I have one of your, well, I don't have it, but a friend of mine shared me tape one of three of criminal complaints and judicial reform.
[39:39.200 --> 39:43.200]  And that's when I first learned even who you were.
[39:43.200 --> 39:51.200]  And I was wondering, is there a place where a fella can get deeper two tapes or similar?
[39:51.200 --> 39:56.200]  I have no idea. I didn't produce those.
[39:56.200 --> 40:06.200]  I have, I have people that are taking my seminars and presentations and producing tapes and CDs from and selling them.
[40:06.200 --> 40:11.200]  But one me, everything is on the website.
[40:11.200 --> 40:13.200]  You might look through the archives.
[40:13.200 --> 40:19.200]  I do have a four hour archive on due process.
[40:19.200 --> 40:26.200]  And I think that is February of 09 when I did that one.
[40:26.200 --> 40:31.200]  But a lot of them have notations stating what's in them.
[40:31.200 --> 40:32.200]  Okay.
[40:32.200 --> 40:35.200]  Not, not all of them, but a good portion do.
[40:35.200 --> 40:36.200]  Okay.
[40:36.200 --> 40:42.200]  Well, I sure appreciate what you people are doing for all of us.
[40:42.200 --> 40:52.200]  I'm pretty green to all of us. I have a friend that is a little more knowledge than when my son started getting his little tiff here.
[40:52.200 --> 40:54.200]  I call him and ask him what I could do.
[40:54.200 --> 41:02.200]  He said, well, go, he said, start studying the law books for about three years and you'll be ready to file something.
[41:02.200 --> 41:06.200]  And I went, oh my God.
[41:06.200 --> 41:17.200]  Well, we hope you can do quicker than that. What you might do is go to the rule of law radio and click on the tab for juris dictionary.
[41:17.200 --> 41:18.200]  Tab.
[41:18.200 --> 41:20.200]  That's a, that is a court.
[41:20.200 --> 41:23.200]  That's a 24 hour or some CDs.
[41:23.200 --> 41:28.200]  You get done with that and you will understand how to fight these guys.
[41:28.200 --> 41:29.200]  Alrighty, sir.
[41:29.200 --> 41:35.200]  And I will go back to the usual bookstore and get the older version.
[41:35.200 --> 41:36.200]  Okay.
[41:36.200 --> 41:43.200]  As far as the dictionaries go, I find them a very little value.
[41:43.200 --> 41:45.200]  Oh, okay.
[41:45.200 --> 41:55.200]  Yeah, I would never quote a black's law definition to any court because it has no legal standing.
[41:55.200 --> 42:05.200]  Now, I may use the dictionary to look behind the meaning and find the case law that supports the definition that they used.
[42:05.200 --> 42:14.200]  If I need generic case law for a bit specific term, but that's all I'd ever use it for it.
[42:14.200 --> 42:20.200]  It's not of much value in helping you learn the legal structure and how things work.
[42:20.200 --> 42:33.200]  That due process, but habeas will walk you right through how a West and trial is supposed to.
[42:33.200 --> 42:44.200]  Jurisdictionary will tell you how to write motions, when to write motions, all of the basics of the practice of law.
[42:44.200 --> 42:46.200]  That'll give you real good grounding.
[42:46.200 --> 42:53.200]  Then you'll be the local friend that people will be going to asking what to do.
[42:53.200 --> 43:03.200]  It is good to use that to know what words mean, because especially when we start talking legal ease,
[43:03.200 --> 43:10.200]  because the words what we're talking as we're communicating with each other and what they legally mean is two different things.
[43:10.200 --> 43:15.200]  So it's good to know users dictionaries for what Randy said, but also to actually know what words mean.
[43:15.200 --> 43:21.200]  Sometimes you'll get a document and it'll have all of these legal words on it and you won't make any sense of it.
[43:21.200 --> 43:23.200]  Then you start looking up what this word means.
[43:23.200 --> 43:28.200]  Now you can decipher what the document really means, not what you thought it meant.
[43:28.200 --> 43:33.200]  Yes, one more thing about that.
[43:33.200 --> 43:39.200]  You can use what it means if it has case law behind it.
[43:39.200 --> 43:45.200]  If there's no case law, just your opinion doesn't mean anything. This is Randy Kelsen.
[43:45.200 --> 43:47.200]  Go to Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[43:47.200 --> 43:48.200]  Read the law radio.
[43:48.200 --> 43:52.200]  Call in number 502-646-1984.
[43:52.200 --> 43:53.200]  Hold on Earl.
[43:53.200 --> 44:01.200]  We'll be right back.
[44:01.200 --> 44:04.200]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.200 --> 44:15.200]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:15.200 --> 44:19.200]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.200 --> 44:23.200]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.200 --> 44:28.200]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[44:28.200 --> 44:34.200]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:34.200 --> 44:43.200]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.200 --> 44:52.200]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.200 --> 45:01.200]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.200 --> 45:05.200]  The Oklahoma City bombing, top 10 reasons to question the official story.
[45:05.200 --> 45:09.200]  Reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices.
[45:09.200 --> 45:17.200]  On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the writer truck report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators.
[45:17.200 --> 45:25.200]  The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone delivered the writer truck bomb to the Murrah building and detonated it.
[45:25.200 --> 45:33.200]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley, who lost her children in one of her legs in the bombing,
[45:33.200 --> 45:39.200]  testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fateful John Doe number two, exiting the writer truck.
[45:39.200 --> 45:51.200]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing, no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing,
[45:51.200 --> 45:57.200]  including when he rented the writer truck, and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:57.200 --> 46:13.200]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:27.200 --> 46:33.200]  Okay, we're back. Run the kelp and go to see McVeigh and Craig.
[46:33.200 --> 46:41.200]  We have live radio. I'm always struck by that lyric. Always be careful of what you're wishing for.
[46:41.200 --> 46:53.200]  Okay, we were talking to Earl, and when we went out we were talking about Black's law, and Phil was right. I needed to clarify a bit.
[46:53.200 --> 47:01.200]  I'm not denigrating Blacks at all. Just never quote Blacks in a legal document.
[47:01.200 --> 47:11.200]  And always when you read the definition, if you read the definition, then it has no case law behind it. That's intended as a common definition.
[47:11.200 --> 47:29.200]  And it gives you no legal authority. If you are using the specific term, or if a lawyer has used that term incorrectly, you go to Blacks, and you want, instead of citing Black's definition,
[47:29.200 --> 47:42.200]  you state the definition as a paraphrase and cite the case law in Blacks as the source of the definition, because if the case law is in there, that's what it is.
[47:42.200 --> 47:52.200]  Now that has authority. Blacks carries no authority in court, but case law does carry authority.
[47:52.200 --> 48:03.200]  And comparing an old Blacks to a current Blacks will demonstrate the effect of the case law and the meanings of the terms.
[48:03.200 --> 48:13.200]  The newer Blacks, if some judge happens to get a wild hair and decides in a case if this word means something different than it always meant,
[48:13.200 --> 48:25.200]  then Blacks gets that case where he defined this word in a screwy way, and then they stick it in the revised to Blacks, because this is the latest definition of the term.
[48:25.200 --> 48:38.200]  Now maybe no other judge would ever use that way, but you'll find it in there anyway. So you want to make sure you keep your terms consistent and have some basis for them.
[48:38.200 --> 48:43.200]  Okay. Anything else?
[48:43.200 --> 48:59.200]  No, sir. I was just wondering if you happened, if any of you happen to see the Corporation Nation, it's a DVD that's out about the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, which is the second
[48:59.200 --> 49:09.200]  of the books that they never talked about. It's quite interesting.
[49:09.200 --> 49:14.200]  I don't know if I've seen that, but we've talked about CAFRA before on several shows.
[49:14.200 --> 49:32.200]  I'm getting ready to go down to my county board meeting here at the next. I ordered about 40 of these, and I handed them out to some of my local friends in the community, and we're going to go down to the next board meeting and ask them about it.
[49:32.200 --> 49:34.200]  Wonderful.
[49:34.200 --> 49:37.200]  That ought to be fun.
[49:37.200 --> 49:48.200]  Okay, we have one more caller. Thank you, Earl. We're going to move on to Chuck in Ohio. Chuck, do you have a question for Phil?
[49:48.200 --> 49:50.200]  Eddie?
[49:50.200 --> 50:01.200]  Hey, I sent you a document a few weeks ago on that loyal title. The Knowledge of a Deed, it was in Bouviers too, the Knowledge of a Deed. I was wondering if you looked at it.
[50:01.200 --> 50:04.200]  I don't recall ever seeing it, Chuck.
[50:04.200 --> 50:19.200]  I sent the document of it, where we took in, it said, Rebecca Sue, the living woman of Rebecca Sue, so we're coming out of a fiction, and we're going into the living person, and then we did mine, which Charles, I was there, and I did my living person.
[50:19.200 --> 50:35.200]  And then we did the, we had the seal from the notary, and then I got the seal from the clerk of course, which made two seals, which made it an order, and then we did the acknowledgement of the land patent, which it was giving.
[50:35.200 --> 50:45.200]  And because we were not the heir, we were the assignee, and they filed it. And my wife had sent it, and I thought, well, I could call you last week, and I thought, well, maybe I could call you today.
[50:45.200 --> 50:56.200]  I thought about it. Well, like I say, I have not read the document, so if you want to rescind it, I'll make a point of doing so. Okay. But I do not recall seeing the email.
[50:56.200 --> 51:04.200]  Okay. Now that you have that up, there are a couple of issues you may want to consider. Yes, I'm listening.
[51:04.200 --> 51:31.200]  If they stop charging tax on the property, you might want to go talk to the fire department. Because if you have brought your land patent forward, and you're out of the tax rolls, the fire department will not be allowed to put out your fire using taxpayer money.
[51:31.200 --> 51:42.200]  The police department will no longer have direct authority on your property. So you'll have to contract with them for their services.
[51:42.200 --> 52:05.200]  When you had a title on your property, that title put you inside this contract, and you paid the taxes. But once you're outside that, that could be a very unpleasant surprise that could come your way. You just need to make sure that you're covered for those potential changes.
[52:05.200 --> 52:18.200]  I do have a pond on my property, and the fire department has a dry hydrant on my pond, which I give them free water to take out any fire in the neighborhood at all. So that might be, might be able to use that as well.
[52:18.200 --> 52:21.200]  My house is on fire. Please put it out.
[52:21.200 --> 52:31.200]  Yeah. Just go talk to them and make sure that they will probably make that contract. You don't want to wait until it catches on fire to see if you have a contract.
[52:31.200 --> 52:36.200]  I might get a written contract on paper.
[52:36.200 --> 52:39.200]  Okay. Okay. So I'm not my next question.
[52:39.200 --> 52:41.200]  Oh, one other thing.
[52:41.200 --> 52:50.200]  As to allowing them to use that hydrant and use your property, you understand you're creating an easement.
[52:50.200 --> 53:15.200]  So creating an easement, whether it's written or not, and not written is the problem. You should also have, you know, you should have that in contract so that you don't get into a problem with adverse possession or creating an easement which they can then express the easement later.
[53:15.200 --> 53:18.200]  Okay. I didn't realize that.
[53:18.200 --> 53:29.200]  Okay. I will do that. So I will make sure that my wife will be at home a couple of days from now. I'll make sure she hands it again and make sure you get that copy of it.
[53:29.200 --> 53:33.200]  Take a look at it and give it to everybody you can so they can do it too.
[53:33.200 --> 53:35.200]  Okay. Wonderful. Thank you, Chuck.
[53:35.200 --> 53:38.200]  Okay. All right. Thanks a lot.
[53:38.200 --> 53:43.200]  Okay. We are getting into our last five minutes.
[53:43.200 --> 53:50.200]  Oh, we've got a whole other segment. So there was something I wanted to talk about before ran out of time.
[53:50.200 --> 53:57.200]  And that's my favorite Australian subject, criminal appearance notices.
[53:57.200 --> 54:01.200]  Now, if you're in front of your computers, go to Aussie net.com.
[54:01.200 --> 54:16.200]  A-U-S-S-I-E, I'm sorry, Aussie law net.com. A-U-S-S-I-E-L-A-W.net. And you can look at a criminal appearance notice.
[54:16.200 --> 54:24.200]  Phil, will you explain what a criminal appearance notice is?
[54:24.200 --> 54:34.200]  Well, I think you should, Randy. It's a bit like an infringement notice that you just give to somebody.
[54:34.200 --> 54:38.200]  It's a notice that you receive basically that you just apply it back on them.
[54:38.200 --> 54:42.200]  But I think you can do it better, Justice, than me at this stage.
[54:42.200 --> 54:54.200]  It's similar. It's essentially the same as a criminal complaint here. But in Australia, you file it as an...
[54:54.200 --> 55:04.200]  Essentially, it looks like a summons. You and your capacity as a common law public official,
[55:04.200 --> 55:12.200]  command that this person appear before the court to answer to a criminal accusation that you met.
[55:12.200 --> 55:17.200]  When I found out they could do this, I was astounded.
[55:17.200 --> 55:23.200]  You know, here in the United States, we can file a criminal complaint.
[55:23.200 --> 55:29.200]  And supposedly, we're protected when we do. I just got prosecuted for filing criminal complaints.
[55:29.200 --> 55:37.200]  Nothing is the way it should be. But we can file criminal complaints, but we have no standing.
[55:37.200 --> 55:44.200]  It is the prosecuting attorney who's given exclusive prosecutorial authority.
[55:44.200 --> 55:50.200]  So we only have a duty to file the complaint as a form of notice to the court.
[55:50.200 --> 55:58.200]  We have no power to ensure that the complaint is acted on or prosecuted.
[55:58.200 --> 56:03.200]  It's different in Australia. In Australia, you have stand.
[56:03.200 --> 56:09.200]  So if you file a criminal appearance notice and the system fails to prosecute,
[56:09.200 --> 56:16.200]  you have standing to appeal their decisions all the way up to the high court.
[56:16.200 --> 56:23.200]  A place that is similar is Pennsylvania.
[56:23.200 --> 56:30.200]  In Pennsylvania, they have given the prosecuting attorney first blush,
[56:30.200 --> 56:35.200]  first opportunity to determine whether or not to prosecute.
[56:35.200 --> 56:39.200]  And when I first saw that, I thought that was a big problem.
[56:39.200 --> 56:47.200]  But in order to act as a check and balance, they gave the filer standing.
[56:47.200 --> 56:53.200]  The prosecutor refuses to prosecute if they can appeal to the court of common police.
[56:53.200 --> 56:59.200]  And if that one refuses, they can appeal it all the way up to the Supreme.
[56:59.200 --> 57:07.200]  But even in Pennsylvania, the individual is not considered a public official in this instance.
[57:07.200 --> 57:12.200]  In Australia, they are.
[57:12.200 --> 57:18.200]  We need one, and that's why when Phil was talking about telling this officer
[57:18.200 --> 57:22.200]  he was going to file a canny, an appearance notice, infringement notice,
[57:22.200 --> 57:25.200]  against him, it got his attention.
[57:25.200 --> 57:30.200]  Because unlike here where you give him a criminal complaint and they throw it in the trash,
[57:30.200 --> 57:37.200]  in Australia, he can appeal it to a higher court and a higher court and then a higher court.
[57:37.200 --> 57:41.200]  And everybody founds out what this cop did.
[57:41.200 --> 57:43.200]  And everybody's asking him questions.
[57:43.200 --> 57:45.200]  Why am I dealing with this mess?
[57:45.200 --> 57:47.200]  What did you do to cause this problem?
[57:47.200 --> 57:52.200]  You can really give them some grief.
[57:52.200 --> 58:00.200]  And so if you go on aussielaw.net, you can find a popular criminal appearance notice.
[58:00.200 --> 58:03.200]  It's a test you look at it.
[58:03.200 --> 58:07.200]  And it looks like we're running out of time in this show.
[58:07.200 --> 58:10.200]  Do you have any closing words, Phil?
[58:10.200 --> 58:12.200]  There ain't any action you have with another hour.
[58:12.200 --> 58:15.200]  Remember that.
[58:15.200 --> 58:18.200]  Oh, I'm looking at the clock wrong.
[58:18.200 --> 58:20.200]  Oh, wonderful. I'm brain dead.
[58:20.200 --> 58:22.200]  I just got chewed out for that.
[58:22.200 --> 58:24.200]  10.38, okay.
[58:24.200 --> 58:26.200]  We have a home.
[58:26.200 --> 58:27.200]  Okay.
[58:27.200 --> 58:29.200]  Just forget the upbringing.
[58:29.200 --> 58:31.200]  This is Randy Sheldon.
[58:31.200 --> 58:33.200]  Jeff Steef and David Craig.
[58:33.200 --> 58:35.200]  I'm getting blamed on the clock.
[58:35.200 --> 58:38.200]  I think the clock knows how to do it.
[58:38.200 --> 58:43.200]  Okay. A calling number is 512-646-1984.
[58:43.200 --> 58:46.200]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[59:00.200 --> 59:04.200]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[59:04.200 --> 59:08.200]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[59:08.200 --> 59:12.200]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:12.200 --> 59:17.200]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:17.200 --> 59:19.200]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:19.200 --> 59:23.200]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:23.200 --> 59:28.200]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:28.200 --> 59:32.200]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:32.200 --> 59:38.200]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:38.200 --> 59:43.200]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:43.200 --> 59:49.200]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free
[59:49.200 --> 59:58.200]  at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:58.200 --> 01:00:03.200]  A new audit this week by the Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program
[01:00:03.200 --> 01:00:08.200]  finds that although there was a $500,000 salary cap on executives
[01:00:08.200 --> 01:00:12.200]  at firms that received assistance between 2009 and 2011,
[01:00:12.200 --> 01:00:17.200]  the Treasury Department approved pay packages worth $5 million or more
[01:00:17.200 --> 01:00:20.200]  for 49 executives at a handful of firms.
[01:00:20.200 --> 01:00:25.200]  In 2009, AIG and the Treasury Department approved pay packages
[01:00:25.200 --> 01:00:30.200]  worth a handful of firms. In 2009, AIG Chief Executive Robert Benmarsh
[01:00:30.200 --> 01:00:34.200]  received a $10.5 million package.
[01:00:34.200 --> 01:00:39.200]  To this day, AIG is still 70% owned by the federal government.
[01:00:39.200 --> 01:00:45.200]  Chinese security forces shot and killed a young Tibetan man in Sichuan province Thursday.
[01:00:45.200 --> 01:00:48.200]  Police and troops opened fire in Aba Prefecture
[01:00:48.200 --> 01:00:52.200]  when a crowd gathered to protect another man being sought for distributing leaflets.
[01:00:52.200 --> 01:00:56.200]  Tensions have been rising in southwest China since a young monk died
[01:00:56.200 --> 01:00:59.200]  after sitting himself on fire in Aba last March.
[01:00:59.200 --> 01:01:03.200]  The National Research Council said Thursday
[01:01:03.200 --> 01:01:08.200]  not enough is known about the potential hazards of nanotechnology
[01:01:08.200 --> 01:01:12.200]  and millions of dollars more a year are needed to study its potential health
[01:01:12.200 --> 01:01:14.200]  and environmental effects.
[01:01:14.200 --> 01:01:19.200]  Nanoparticles have been linked to organ and DNA damage, respiratory illness,
[01:01:19.200 --> 01:01:23.200]  stunted crop growth, and the destruction of beneficial bacteria
[01:01:23.200 --> 01:01:26.200]  and wastewater treatment systems.
[01:01:26.200 --> 01:01:30.200]  James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, said Thursday the U.S.
[01:01:30.200 --> 01:01:35.200]  has taken serious and noticeable measures to prevent another breach of classified files
[01:01:35.200 --> 01:01:37.200]  like the massive WikiLeaks document dump.
[01:01:37.200 --> 01:01:40.200]  Clapper said changes were being implemented over the next five years
[01:01:40.200 --> 01:01:45.200]  that would create a new security architecture, making it harder to disclose America's secrets.
[01:01:45.200 --> 01:01:50.200]  The WikiLeaks website began releasing U.S. military documents in July 2010.
[01:01:50.200 --> 01:01:55.200]  It dumped the entire archive of diplomatic documents in September 2011,
[01:01:55.200 --> 01:01:57.200]  causing huge embarrassment to Washington.
[01:01:57.200 --> 01:02:00.200]  Among the numerous revelations from WikiLeaks,
[01:02:00.200 --> 01:02:03.200]  the U.S. killed two Reuters reporters in Iraq and covered it up.
[01:02:03.200 --> 01:02:07.200]  The U.S. spied on top U.N. officials and the U.S. handed over detainees
[01:02:07.200 --> 01:02:12.200]  to Iraq and Afghan security forces with the full knowledge they would be tortured.
[01:02:12.200 --> 01:02:16.200]  Army Private Bradley Manning has been court-martialed for allegedly
[01:02:16.200 --> 01:02:20.200]  funneling the hundreds of thousands of classified documents to WikiLeaks.
[01:02:20.200 --> 01:02:24.200]  In President Obama's State of the Union address Tuesday,
[01:02:24.200 --> 01:02:27.200]  he lauded American natural gas development,
[01:02:27.200 --> 01:02:31.200]  suggesting it would support 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade.
[01:02:31.200 --> 01:02:34.200]  At a subsequent campaign event later this week,
[01:02:34.200 --> 01:02:40.200]  Obama told supporters in Nevada that America is sitting on the Saudi Arabia of natural gas.
[01:02:40.200 --> 01:02:45.200]  One word notably absent from the President's energy rhetoric is the term fracking,
[01:02:45.200 --> 01:02:47.200]  short for hydraulic fracturing.
[01:02:47.200 --> 01:02:51.200]  It's a technique to free oil and gas from shale rock that uses
[01:02:51.200 --> 01:02:55.200]  prodigious amounts of water laced with sand and poisonous chemicals
[01:02:55.200 --> 01:02:57.200]  to blast the methane out of the shale.
[01:02:57.200 --> 01:03:01.200]  The technique has been linked to widespread environmental contamination,
[01:03:01.200 --> 01:03:06.200]  so it's no surprise the term fracking has negative connotations in the public's consciousness.
[01:03:06.200 --> 01:03:10.200]  Deborah Mitchell, who teaches marketing at the University of Wisconsin,
[01:03:10.200 --> 01:03:12.200]  told the Associated Press, quote,
[01:03:12.200 --> 01:03:17.200]  when you hear the word fracking, what lights up your brain is the profanity.
[01:03:17.200 --> 01:03:46.200]  For more details on this story, visit INF.org.net.
[01:03:47.200 --> 01:03:54.200]  I will lie by my father's arm till he returns.
[01:03:54.200 --> 01:03:58.200]  I will lie by my father's arm till he returns.
[01:03:58.200 --> 01:04:02.200]  He has to be with his faith and with God.
[01:04:02.200 --> 01:04:05.200]  I will aid my concern.
[01:04:05.200 --> 01:04:16.200]  I will lie by my father's arm till I return.
[01:04:16.200 --> 01:04:29.200]  I will lie by my father's arm till I return.
[01:04:29.200 --> 01:04:30.200]  Okay, we're back.
[01:04:30.200 --> 01:04:32.200]  We ran the count in good student day.
[01:04:32.200 --> 01:04:34.200]  We used our radio.
[01:04:34.200 --> 01:04:37.200]  We have our very special guest.
[01:04:37.200 --> 01:04:39.200]  Phil Fried from Australia.
[01:04:39.200 --> 01:04:42.200]  And we're going to go to Walt in New York.
[01:04:42.200 --> 01:04:45.200]  Walt, aren't you the truck driver?
[01:04:45.200 --> 01:04:47.200]  No.
[01:04:47.200 --> 01:04:48.200]  Oh, okay.
[01:04:48.200 --> 01:04:54.200]  We have someone from New York who's a truck driver.
[01:04:54.200 --> 01:04:57.200]  I was going to pick on you, if you were,
[01:04:57.200 --> 01:05:04.200]  because when I was in Australia, they got trucks in Australia.
[01:05:04.200 --> 01:05:10.200]  We got on the expressway heading from Sydney to Gosford.
[01:05:10.200 --> 01:05:14.200]  And these trucks are all triple axles.
[01:05:14.200 --> 01:05:18.200]  These tires look 24, 26 inches.
[01:05:18.200 --> 01:05:24.200]  They're pulling doubles, and both of the doubles have triple axles.
[01:05:24.200 --> 01:05:27.200]  These were big trucks.
[01:05:27.200 --> 01:05:32.200]  Our trucks are toys next to Australian trucks.
[01:05:32.200 --> 01:05:38.200]  Phil, do you know what the maximum weight a truck can pull in Australia is?
[01:05:38.200 --> 01:05:43.200]  Well, here we have trucks that we even call routed trains.
[01:05:43.200 --> 01:05:47.200]  And the trucks that you're referring to, we call them B-doubles.
[01:05:47.200 --> 01:05:51.200]  And they're virtually, it's like two semi-trailers in one.
[01:05:51.200 --> 01:05:58.200]  But out back, you know, towards the centre of Australia,
[01:05:58.200 --> 01:06:05.200]  it's not uncommon to see one semi-trailer pulling three, four, five trailers behind it
[01:06:05.200 --> 01:06:08.200]  and huge horse power.
[01:06:08.200 --> 01:06:14.200]  And they're called routed trains, mostly used to move livestock.
[01:06:14.200 --> 01:06:23.200]  Tonnage, weighs, you know, it's probably up to 100 tonnes, depends on how much.
[01:06:23.200 --> 01:06:27.200]  Each trailer probably runs 26,000 to 30,000 pounds each.
[01:06:27.200 --> 01:06:31.200]  Yeah, so it depends on how much they're pulling.
[01:06:31.200 --> 01:06:34.200]  We look at it, 16,000 to 18,000 for the tractor.
[01:06:34.200 --> 01:06:39.200]  These are probably heavier pulling triple axles, three rear ends.
[01:06:39.200 --> 01:06:41.200]  That thing's probably got a monster motor in them.
[01:06:41.200 --> 01:06:43.200]  These are really massive trucks.
[01:06:43.200 --> 01:06:46.200]  Okay, I kind of let us off point.
[01:06:46.200 --> 01:06:48.200]  Walt, what do you have for us today?
[01:06:48.200 --> 01:06:51.200]  Okay, these are some questions that you've answered before,
[01:06:51.200 --> 01:06:54.200]  but it's a different viewpoint I'm having if I want to ask you about.
[01:06:54.200 --> 01:06:57.200]  This one's about mostly this first one is to Eddie.
[01:06:57.200 --> 01:07:01.200]  Eddie, if a law enforcement officer is trying to pull you off the road
[01:07:01.200 --> 01:07:04.200]  when you're traveling in your car.
[01:07:04.200 --> 01:07:07.200]  I remember I heard you say, try to get off into a private parking lot
[01:07:07.200 --> 01:07:09.200]  so they can't tow a way around a warrant or something.
[01:07:09.200 --> 01:07:11.200]  Uh-oh, my phone's going dead.
[01:07:11.200 --> 01:07:13.200]  I'm going to have to call you back on my other phone.
[01:07:13.200 --> 01:07:15.200]  I'm sorry.
[01:07:15.200 --> 01:07:24.200]  Okay, we're going to go to Andrew in North Carolina.
[01:07:24.200 --> 01:07:26.200]  Yeah, hi guys, how you doing?
[01:07:26.200 --> 01:07:27.200]  Hello, Andrew.
[01:07:27.200 --> 01:07:29.200]  What do you have for us today?
[01:07:29.200 --> 01:07:33.200]  Okay, so I just had a couple questions.
[01:07:33.200 --> 01:07:38.200]  I live in North Carolina, but I have a house in New Jersey
[01:07:38.200 --> 01:07:43.200]  and I've received a couple of citations for,
[01:07:43.200 --> 01:07:49.200]  it's referred to as weath and debris, it's a town ordinance.
[01:07:49.200 --> 01:07:53.200]  And I filed the motions.
[01:07:53.200 --> 01:07:55.200]  I was never properly notified,
[01:07:55.200 --> 01:07:59.200]  so I filed a motion challenging the jurisdiction.
[01:07:59.200 --> 01:08:01.200]  And the issue that I'm having right now
[01:08:01.200 --> 01:08:05.200]  is that the judge won't even respond to the motions.
[01:08:05.200 --> 01:08:07.200]  They just keep getting, you know,
[01:08:07.200 --> 01:08:10.200]  he just keeps pushing the trial date back further.
[01:08:10.200 --> 01:08:14.200]  And the last notice I got,
[01:08:14.200 --> 01:08:18.200]  there is now actually a warrant out for my arrest.
[01:08:18.200 --> 01:08:20.200]  I have no, you know, the judge won't...
[01:08:20.200 --> 01:08:22.200]  They can't issue a warrant for your arrest
[01:08:22.200 --> 01:08:26.200]  if they're the ones rescheduling the court dates.
[01:08:26.200 --> 01:08:28.200]  You need to be filing criminal charges
[01:08:28.200 --> 01:08:32.200]  against whatever judge signed that warrant.
[01:08:32.200 --> 01:08:35.200]  And why is it that I'm filing criminal charges?
[01:08:35.200 --> 01:08:39.200]  Because the warrant is meant to...
[01:08:39.200 --> 01:08:42.200]  They're threatening you to come in and settle with them
[01:08:42.200 --> 01:08:44.200]  rather than challenge them is what they're doing.
[01:08:44.200 --> 01:08:47.200]  The warrant is issued illegally.
[01:08:47.200 --> 01:08:50.200]  Okay, let me give you the statute.
[01:08:50.200 --> 01:08:54.200]  Every state except New Mexico,
[01:08:54.200 --> 01:08:56.200]  at least New Mexico, I couldn't find it,
[01:08:56.200 --> 01:08:58.200]  but I found it in every other state I looked in,
[01:08:58.200 --> 01:09:03.200]  has a statute that reflects the Ku Klux Klan Act.
[01:09:03.200 --> 01:09:07.200]  Ku Klux Klan Act was passed after the Civil War
[01:09:07.200 --> 01:09:13.200]  because of the sheriffs and constables and mayors
[01:09:13.200 --> 01:09:16.200]  were pretty well left in place in the south.
[01:09:16.200 --> 01:09:19.200]  And the northern Yankee carpetbaggers
[01:09:19.200 --> 01:09:23.200]  came down and gave those hillbillies directions
[01:09:23.200 --> 01:09:25.200]  on how they were to run their business,
[01:09:25.200 --> 01:09:28.200]  and those hillbillies told those Yankee carpetbaggers
[01:09:28.200 --> 01:09:31.200]  they hitched a road and they'd do what they wanted to.
[01:09:31.200 --> 01:09:34.200]  So the legislature passed the Ku Klux Klan Act.
[01:09:34.200 --> 01:09:37.200]  Most of us know of the Ku Klux Klan Act
[01:09:37.200 --> 01:09:42.200]  because of 42 U.S. Code 1983.
[01:09:42.200 --> 01:09:45.200]  The second half of the Ku Klux Klan Act
[01:09:45.200 --> 01:09:47.200]  was codified into that statute,
[01:09:47.200 --> 01:09:52.200]  and that makes it so that if a public official violates law
[01:09:52.200 --> 01:09:54.200]  relating to his office and harms you,
[01:09:54.200 --> 01:09:57.200]  you can sue him in the civil court.
[01:09:57.200 --> 01:09:59.200]  That's the second half.
[01:09:59.200 --> 01:10:02.200]  The first half says that if a public official,
[01:10:02.200 --> 01:10:04.200]  acting under the call of his authority,
[01:10:04.200 --> 01:10:07.200]  exerts or purports to exert an authority
[01:10:07.200 --> 01:10:09.200]  he does not expressly have,
[01:10:09.200 --> 01:10:13.200]  or fails to perform a duty he's required to perform
[01:10:13.200 --> 01:10:16.200]  and in the process denies a citizen
[01:10:16.200 --> 01:10:20.200]  in the full and free access to or enjoyment of a right,
[01:10:20.200 --> 01:10:23.200]  that's the federal crime.
[01:10:23.200 --> 01:10:25.200]  It's class A misdemeanor in the Fed,
[01:10:25.200 --> 01:10:29.200]  and every state except in Mexico so far
[01:10:29.200 --> 01:10:34.200]  has a statute that reflects the Ku Klux Klan Act.
[01:10:34.200 --> 01:10:39.200]  Everybody should know that particular statute.
[01:10:39.200 --> 01:10:45.200]  If the judge exercised an authority he did not have,
[01:10:45.200 --> 01:10:49.200]  and in the process denied you in a right,
[01:10:49.200 --> 01:10:51.200]  that's a crime.
[01:10:51.200 --> 01:10:53.200]  And he should be prosecuted
[01:10:53.200 --> 01:10:55.200]  if anybody should be prosecuted.
[01:10:55.200 --> 01:10:57.200]  He should.
[01:10:57.200 --> 01:11:01.200]  H. G. Wells and his outline of history
[01:11:01.200 --> 01:11:04.200]  on speaking to the corruption of the popes
[01:11:04.200 --> 01:11:06.200]  during the Dark Ages,
[01:11:06.200 --> 01:11:10.200]  and all you Catholics, I'm not disparaging the Catholics.
[01:11:10.200 --> 01:11:12.200]  This is just history.
[01:11:12.200 --> 01:11:15.200]  On speaking to the corruption of the popes,
[01:11:15.200 --> 01:11:19.200]  he very aptly observed
[01:11:19.200 --> 01:11:24.200]  the giver of the law most owes the law allegiance.
[01:11:24.200 --> 01:11:29.200]  He of all beings should behave as though the law compels him.
[01:11:29.200 --> 01:11:32.200]  But it is the universal failing of mankind
[01:11:32.200 --> 01:11:35.200]  that what we are given to administer
[01:11:35.200 --> 01:11:38.200]  we promptly presume we own.
[01:11:38.200 --> 01:11:43.200]  And when this judge presumes he owns the law,
[01:11:43.200 --> 01:11:47.200]  you need to remind him who really owns the law.
[01:11:47.200 --> 01:11:49.200]  You do.
[01:11:49.200 --> 01:11:51.200]  Right.
[01:11:51.200 --> 01:11:54.200]  So speaking about ownership,
[01:11:54.200 --> 01:11:57.200]  we're having the same sort of issues here.
[01:11:57.200 --> 01:12:03.200]  Do you own that land or that property that is in question?
[01:12:03.200 --> 01:12:05.200]  Well, there is a mortgage on it,
[01:12:05.200 --> 01:12:09.200]  but yes, besides from that I own it.
[01:12:09.200 --> 01:12:13.200]  So your name is on that deed of title?
[01:12:13.200 --> 01:12:15.200]  Yes.
[01:12:15.200 --> 01:12:18.200]  Does the county or anybody else
[01:12:18.200 --> 01:12:22.200]  have a registered lien on that property?
[01:12:22.200 --> 01:12:26.200]  No, as far as I know there's no other liens on it.
[01:12:26.200 --> 01:12:29.200]  Well, this comes back down to ownership.
[01:12:29.200 --> 01:12:32.200]  I don't know if you're listening when I read out
[01:12:32.200 --> 01:12:35.200]  their version of your freedom.
[01:12:35.200 --> 01:12:39.200]  The legal terminology of owner or ownership states
[01:12:39.200 --> 01:12:45.200]  that I think that a person owns
[01:12:45.200 --> 01:12:50.200]  to the exclusion of all other persons.
[01:12:50.200 --> 01:12:54.200]  So for anyone to have or claim
[01:12:54.200 --> 01:12:57.200]  that they can tell you or dictate to you
[01:12:57.200 --> 01:13:00.200]  what you can and can't do on something that you own
[01:13:00.200 --> 01:13:02.200]  there's two elements there.
[01:13:02.200 --> 01:13:06.200]  Either you own it to the exclusion of all others
[01:13:06.200 --> 01:13:09.200]  or they own it,
[01:13:09.200 --> 01:13:12.200]  which therefore if they own it,
[01:13:12.200 --> 01:13:16.200]  also they own the liability to it.
[01:13:16.200 --> 01:13:19.200]  So can you please clarify who actually owns the land?
[01:13:19.200 --> 01:13:23.200]  If I do, then I'm the owner, the exclusion of all others.
[01:13:23.200 --> 01:13:26.200]  What registered lien or ownership are you exercising
[01:13:26.200 --> 01:13:28.200]  over me or the land?
[01:13:28.200 --> 01:13:31.200]  If you own the land then I've obviously been misled
[01:13:31.200 --> 01:13:34.200]  and deceived somehow because I've paid all this money for it
[01:13:34.200 --> 01:13:37.200]  and if you're exercising ownership over it
[01:13:37.200 --> 01:13:40.200]  then you hold the liability to maintain it.
[01:13:40.200 --> 01:13:43.200]  Great. Okay.
[01:13:43.200 --> 01:13:48.200]  Okay, we knew a guy who used to get property
[01:13:48.200 --> 01:13:52.200]  off of tax rules in New York
[01:13:52.200 --> 01:13:56.200]  and he did exactly what Phil was talking about.
[01:13:56.200 --> 01:14:01.200]  Now, he would send the registrar a letter
[01:14:01.200 --> 01:14:06.200]  asking the registrar if the state had any claim
[01:14:06.200 --> 01:14:08.200]  against his property
[01:14:08.200 --> 01:14:13.200]  and they would send back a response saying no they don't.
[01:14:13.200 --> 01:14:17.200]  Then he would send a letter asking them to move his,
[01:14:17.200 --> 01:14:21.200]  I'm sorry, the first letter went to the clerk of the court,
[01:14:21.200 --> 01:14:26.200]  the county clerk who's also the keeper of the record
[01:14:26.200 --> 01:14:29.200]  and then he'd get a letter saying no they don't.
[01:14:29.200 --> 01:14:33.200]  Then he'd send that letter to the registrar,
[01:14:33.200 --> 01:14:36.200]  asking the registrar to remove his property
[01:14:36.200 --> 01:14:38.200]  from the public tax rolls
[01:14:38.200 --> 01:14:42.200]  or from the state tax rolls to the private rolls
[01:14:42.200 --> 01:14:48.200]  and in the private rolls they weren't taxable
[01:14:48.200 --> 01:14:52.200]  because the state no longer had a claim against the property
[01:14:52.200 --> 01:14:55.200]  and when he asked the clerk for that letter
[01:14:55.200 --> 01:14:57.200]  the clerk generally,
[01:14:57.200 --> 01:15:02.200]  I'm not sure if the clerk has a option
[01:15:02.200 --> 01:15:06.200]  that looks like the procedure they don't tell you about
[01:15:06.200 --> 01:15:08.200]  for getting off the tax rolls
[01:15:08.200 --> 01:15:11.200]  but you might consider that
[01:15:11.200 --> 01:15:14.200]  and Eddie you might want to talk about
[01:15:14.200 --> 01:15:19.200]  who a corporation can enforce its laws against.
[01:15:19.200 --> 01:15:21.200]  Well every state constitution says
[01:15:21.200 --> 01:15:24.200]  who has the authority to create and make law
[01:15:24.200 --> 01:15:27.200]  within the territorial boundaries of that state.
[01:15:27.200 --> 01:15:31.200]  Here in Texas article 3 section 29 through 35
[01:15:31.200 --> 01:15:34.200]  make it very clear that authority is vested completely
[01:15:34.200 --> 01:15:38.200]  and totally in the state legislature.
[01:15:38.200 --> 01:15:41.200]  The state legislature is not given any ability
[01:15:41.200 --> 01:15:44.200]  to delegate law making authority.
[01:15:44.200 --> 01:15:48.200]  Therefore anything made by a political subdivision
[01:15:48.200 --> 01:15:53.200]  such as a county or city is nothing more than a rule
[01:15:53.200 --> 01:15:57.200]  and a rule by definition upon the populace
[01:15:57.200 --> 01:16:00.200]  can only be directory meaning
[01:16:00.200 --> 01:16:03.200]  we recommend you do it this way.
[01:16:03.200 --> 01:16:05.200]  They cannot compel you to do it
[01:16:05.200 --> 01:16:10.200]  because only law can compel the people to do anything.
[01:16:10.200 --> 01:16:12.200]  Not a rule.
[01:16:12.200 --> 01:16:13.200]  Right.
[01:16:13.200 --> 01:16:16.200]  I think it's actually a little bit different in New Jersey.
[01:16:16.200 --> 01:16:19.200]  I believe the constitution dictates
[01:16:19.200 --> 01:16:21.200]  that this state can make law
[01:16:21.200 --> 01:16:26.200]  and I think that there is actually a law backing up this ordinance.
[01:16:26.200 --> 01:16:30.200]  And I think the constitution actually says that
[01:16:30.200 --> 01:16:36.200]  that ordinance is backed up by law or valid.
[01:16:36.200 --> 01:16:38.200]  Well they say the same thing here.
[01:16:38.200 --> 01:16:40.200]  The question is are they charging you
[01:16:40.200 --> 01:16:42.200]  with the state law or the ordinance?
[01:16:42.200 --> 01:16:44.200]  If they're charging you with an ordinance
[01:16:44.200 --> 01:16:46.200]  it's a non-law.
[01:16:46.200 --> 01:16:49.200]  You can't violate a non-law.
[01:16:49.200 --> 01:16:51.200]  Great.
[01:16:51.200 --> 01:16:52.200]  Okay.
[01:16:52.200 --> 01:16:53.200]  We're about to go to break.
[01:16:53.200 --> 01:16:56.200]  Randy Kelton, Debbie Steedley, Debbie Craig.
[01:16:56.200 --> 01:16:57.200]  Live Law Radio.
[01:16:57.200 --> 01:16:59.200]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:01.200 --> 01:17:04.200]  Capital Corn and Bullion is a family owned and operated
[01:17:04.200 --> 01:17:06.200]  business that has helped many families and friends
[01:17:06.200 --> 01:17:08.200]  in protecting their assets.
[01:17:08.200 --> 01:17:10.200]  And we would like to do the same for you.
[01:17:10.200 --> 01:17:12.200]  In addition to Coins and Bullion
[01:17:12.200 --> 01:17:14.200]  we now offer Patriot Saves.
[01:17:14.200 --> 01:17:15.200]  Ammunition.
[01:17:15.200 --> 01:17:16.200]  Berkey Water Products.
[01:17:16.200 --> 01:17:17.200]  Gift Certificates.
[01:17:17.200 --> 01:17:18.200]  Risk Bands.
[01:17:18.200 --> 01:17:20.200]  And our new Silver Pool.
[01:17:20.200 --> 01:17:24.200]  A new way to guarantee silver by pre-paying at a locked price.
[01:17:24.200 --> 01:17:27.200]  We can even help you set up a metals IRA account.
[01:17:27.200 --> 01:17:33.200]  Call us at 512-646-6440 for more details.
[01:17:33.200 --> 01:17:37.200]  As always, we buy, sell and trade precious metals
[01:17:37.200 --> 01:17:40.200]  and cater to those with all sizes of coin collections.
[01:17:40.200 --> 01:17:44.200]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A.
[01:17:44.200 --> 01:17:46.200]  About a half a mile north of Canaan,
[01:17:46.200 --> 01:17:49.200]  next to the Ikebon Sushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[01:17:49.200 --> 01:17:52.200]  We're open Monday through Friday 10-6,
[01:17:52.200 --> 01:17:54.200]  Saturdays 10-5.
[01:17:54.200 --> 01:17:56.200]  Visit us at CapitalCornandBullion.com
[01:17:56.200 --> 01:18:00.200]  or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.200 --> 01:18:03.200]  What's been the problem with phone companies?
[01:18:03.200 --> 01:18:07.200]  High prices and contracts that lock you in for two years minimum.
[01:18:07.200 --> 01:18:09.200]  Not FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:09.200 --> 01:18:11.200]  Freedom Telephones are designed around the concept
[01:18:11.200 --> 01:18:15.200]  and reality of patriotism, loyalty and privacy.
[01:18:15.200 --> 01:18:18.200]  With FreedomTelephones.com there are no contracts,
[01:18:18.200 --> 01:18:21.200]  no credit checks and no social security numbers required.
[01:18:21.200 --> 01:18:24.200]  That's why our name is FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:24.200 --> 01:18:27.200]  Finally, residential, mobile and business telephones
[01:18:27.200 --> 01:18:31.200]  and plans that are private and never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:31.200 --> 01:18:36.200]  When a low price, residential and business plans started only $14.99
[01:18:36.200 --> 01:18:39.200]  and mobile plans started just $39.99.
[01:18:39.200 --> 01:18:41.200]  Plus, every month you pay your bill,
[01:18:41.200 --> 01:18:44.200]  FreedomTelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs.
[01:18:44.200 --> 01:18:47.200]  Don't wait, support the cause and get the highest quality
[01:18:47.200 --> 01:18:52.200]  and the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553.
[01:18:52.200 --> 01:18:56.200]  That's 800-600-5553.
[01:18:56.200 --> 01:18:58.200]  FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:58.200 --> 01:19:26.200]  affordable, private, perfect.
[01:19:26.200 --> 01:19:30.200]  I can't get everything I want.
[01:19:30.200 --> 01:19:37.200]  Get a ranger.
[01:19:37.200 --> 01:19:42.200]  If I can't get everything I need.
[01:19:42.200 --> 01:19:48.200]  I never get a ranger.
[01:19:48.200 --> 01:19:50.200]  People of the world
[01:19:50.200 --> 01:19:53.200]  can't get an happy sense and be.
[01:19:53.200 --> 01:20:21.200]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:20:21.200 --> 01:20:26.200]  Alright, we have about 40 minutes left in our Friday night for our marathon.
[01:20:26.200 --> 01:20:31.200]  Right now, we are still talking to, we're talking to Leon in Nevada,
[01:20:31.200 --> 01:20:33.200]  or we're talking to Walt in New York.
[01:20:33.200 --> 01:20:35.200]  Walt in New York.
[01:20:35.200 --> 01:20:38.200]  Okay, alright, Walt, let's continue on.
[01:20:38.200 --> 01:20:40.200]  Am I on now?
[01:20:40.200 --> 01:20:41.200]  Yes you are.
[01:20:41.200 --> 01:20:45.200]  Okay, I'm on a cell phone, I hope you can hear me okay.
[01:20:45.200 --> 01:20:49.200]  We can hear you as long as your battery stays up.
[01:20:49.200 --> 01:20:54.200]  When you're going to get pulled over by a law enforcement officer,
[01:20:54.200 --> 01:20:59.200]  and you haven't got a place for let's say a quarter of a mile to get off the road,
[01:20:59.200 --> 01:21:00.200]  what do you do?
[01:21:00.200 --> 01:21:05.200]  Is he going to get, he's going to get kicked off if you don't stop, won't he?
[01:21:05.200 --> 01:21:08.200]  I turn on my emergency flashers.
[01:21:08.200 --> 01:21:14.200]  I will slow down my speed, I will wave and acknowledge their existence.
[01:21:14.200 --> 01:21:21.200]  Anything and everything to show that you are not making any attempt to evade the officer.
[01:21:21.200 --> 01:21:26.200]  Okay, if you are unsure as to how far you may actually have to go,
[01:21:26.200 --> 01:21:31.200]  then pull as far off of the shoulder of the road as you are physically able.
[01:21:31.200 --> 01:21:37.200]  Meaning if you've got open access to, you know, 50, 60 feet off the side of the road,
[01:21:37.200 --> 01:21:41.200]  pull way up off the side of the road somewhere.
[01:21:41.200 --> 01:21:46.200]  Don't park on the shoulder, don't park in the little median beside the shoulder,
[01:21:46.200 --> 01:21:52.200]  get off of the road, get away from the center line of the road.
[01:21:52.200 --> 01:22:01.200]  Anytime they can say the justification is your vehicle is a danger or hazard to the public
[01:22:01.200 --> 01:22:07.200]  because of where it is, then they have the ability to tow it.
[01:22:07.200 --> 01:22:18.200]  If you remove their ability to make that presumption, then it's theft, plain and simple.
[01:22:18.200 --> 01:22:23.200]  Okay, my phone is cut now, can you still hear me?
[01:22:23.200 --> 01:22:25.200]  Yes, we can hear you.
[01:22:25.200 --> 01:22:32.200]  Okay, also if you're walking or suppose you're over,
[01:22:32.200 --> 01:22:37.200]  you may have to identify yourself if they don't show probable cause.
[01:22:37.200 --> 01:22:46.200]  No, you do not ever have to engage in a conversation with a cop for any reason.
[01:22:46.200 --> 01:22:52.200]  They cannot arbitrarily walk up to you and demand that you produce them with identification
[01:22:52.200 --> 01:22:56.200]  or other personal information of any kind.
[01:22:56.200 --> 01:23:01.200]  If they want that from you, they have to have some sort of reasonable probable cause
[01:23:01.200 --> 01:23:04.200]  and stop entertaining you for the purpose of getting it.
[01:23:04.200 --> 01:23:10.200]  Just because they want to know or think they have a right to know is not probable cause
[01:23:10.200 --> 01:23:14.200]  and it is not sufficient.
[01:23:14.200 --> 01:23:22.200]  Okay, there is a good YouTube video on that subject.
[01:23:22.200 --> 01:23:27.200]  If you Google, if you put it, go into YouTube and type in, don't talk to the police.
[01:23:27.200 --> 01:23:32.200]  There's a law professor giving a speech to some law students
[01:23:32.200 --> 01:23:36.200]  why they should never ever engage or talk to the police
[01:23:36.200 --> 01:23:43.200]  because everything that you do and say can and will be used against you.
[01:23:43.200 --> 01:23:50.200]  Everything that you do or say will never be used in your favour or for you.
[01:23:50.200 --> 01:23:56.200]  So when police pulls you over, when police are talking to you, police are not your friend
[01:23:56.200 --> 01:24:02.200]  and this is why that law professor talks about whatever you do, don't talk to the police.
[01:24:02.200 --> 01:24:07.200]  And even the law school, legal practitioner, the worst thing that anyone can do
[01:24:07.200 --> 01:24:12.200]  if you're a solicitor is for their client to talk to the police
[01:24:12.200 --> 01:24:17.200]  because everything that you do and you say can and will be used against you
[01:24:17.200 --> 01:24:22.200]  but it will never be used for you or in your favour.
[01:24:22.200 --> 01:24:27.200]  Okay, the next question is whether you're walking or in your car
[01:24:27.200 --> 01:24:32.200]  and an officer comes up to you and you pull out your little audio recording device
[01:24:32.200 --> 01:24:38.200]  and they don't like it when they see that in their hand.
[01:24:38.200 --> 01:24:43.200]  Okay, if you got as far as see it in your hand and you disappeared, Walt, try again.
[01:24:43.200 --> 01:24:46.200]  Okay, here's my suggestion, Walt.
[01:24:46.200 --> 01:24:52.200]  If you have one and you have it in your hand, only show it to him
[01:24:52.200 --> 01:24:57.200]  if you have a second one in your pocket.
[01:24:57.200 --> 01:25:01.200]  And let him tell you to turn the first one off.
[01:25:01.200 --> 01:25:07.200]  We had someone from New York, had two, this is a while back
[01:25:07.200 --> 01:25:13.200]  and on the second one he recorded the officers on the first one
[01:25:13.200 --> 01:25:19.200]  trying to figure out how to waste the first one.
[01:25:19.200 --> 01:25:21.200]  So that really worked out well.
[01:25:21.200 --> 01:25:23.200]  Actually, you lost Walt.
[01:25:23.200 --> 01:25:28.200]  We had made that suggestion and this guy had followed the suggestion
[01:25:28.200 --> 01:25:30.200]  and was really pleased.
[01:25:30.200 --> 01:25:33.200]  He handled them really well.
[01:25:33.200 --> 01:25:37.200]  Just to say, after that there are multiple recording devices.
[01:25:37.200 --> 01:25:41.200]  You can get pens, you can get pendants, you can get things that even look like
[01:25:41.200 --> 01:25:46.200]  car opening systems, all of which can be recording devices and good to have.
[01:25:46.200 --> 01:25:49.200]  Your phone is a recording device if you have it on you.
[01:25:49.200 --> 01:25:52.200]  So there are numerous recording devices that you have and I agree.
[01:25:52.200 --> 01:25:59.200]  You should have multiple devices, sound and video going when they do because they do.
[01:25:59.200 --> 01:26:01.200]  So, Walt, you did too.
[01:26:01.200 --> 01:26:05.200]  I wanted to see my local sheriff and I kind of knew him.
[01:26:05.200 --> 01:26:11.200]  We were in his office and he started talking and I told him,
[01:26:11.200 --> 01:26:16.200]  Sheriff, I'm getting kind of old and I'm no combat veteran.
[01:26:16.200 --> 01:26:19.200]  I have some problems with my hearing.
[01:26:19.200 --> 01:26:24.200]  Will you look and speak clearly into my pen please?
[01:26:24.200 --> 01:26:29.200]  The look on his face was priceless.
[01:26:29.200 --> 01:26:32.200]  I didn't have one.
[01:26:32.200 --> 01:26:40.200]  I actually had it in my pants pocket but I didn't have a recording pen.
[01:26:40.200 --> 01:26:45.200]  Anyway, let's go to Clint in Texas.
[01:26:45.200 --> 01:26:53.200]  Clint, do you have a question or a comment for Phil?
[01:26:53.200 --> 01:26:54.200]  Clint, are you there?
[01:26:54.200 --> 01:26:56.200]  I think we just lost Clint.
[01:26:56.200 --> 01:27:00.200]  Okay, we're going to go to Leon in Nevada.
[01:27:00.200 --> 01:27:03.200]  Leon, do you have a question or comment for Phil?
[01:27:03.200 --> 01:27:05.200]  Yes, good evening, guys.
[01:27:05.200 --> 01:27:10.200]  First, let me just say, you know, you guys have like maybe the best radio show on
[01:27:10.200 --> 01:27:14.200]  nationally that really, you know, it's where the rubber meets the road on
[01:27:14.200 --> 01:27:16.200]  defending our individual rights.
[01:27:16.200 --> 01:27:19.200]  I got to really just tell you guys, you do a fantastic job.
[01:27:19.200 --> 01:27:20.200]  Thank you.
[01:27:20.200 --> 01:27:25.200]  In fact, you had a colleague a few minutes ago talking about the lands rights issues.
[01:27:25.200 --> 01:27:28.200]  I know here in Nevada, you have an opportunity to get what's called an
[01:27:28.200 --> 01:27:32.200]  audio title, which I think very, very few people realize that you can
[01:27:32.200 --> 01:27:36.200]  actually get a piece of property and not have it be a public property, like you
[01:27:36.200 --> 01:27:40.200]  guys say, because a certificate of title doesn't necessarily prove ownership.
[01:27:40.200 --> 01:27:41.200]  That's from my understanding.
[01:27:41.200 --> 01:27:43.200]  Is that correct?
[01:27:43.200 --> 01:27:46.200]  A certificate of title does not prove ownership at all.
[01:27:46.200 --> 01:27:51.200]  By definition, a certificate of title is an instrument that shows that the
[01:27:51.200 --> 01:27:55.200]  individual is the legal owner, not the equity owner.
[01:27:55.200 --> 01:28:01.200]  The legal owner is one that has all the appearance of ownership, but has no
[01:28:01.200 --> 01:28:04.200]  final say in the disposition of the property.
[01:28:04.200 --> 01:28:09.200]  For instance, if you lease a car, you appear to be the legal owner because
[01:28:09.200 --> 01:28:14.200]  of the lease, but you do not have the right to go out and sell the car.
[01:28:14.200 --> 01:28:15.200]  Exactly.
[01:28:15.200 --> 01:28:19.200]  And property tax amounts to nothing less than rent, if I'm not mistaken.
[01:28:19.200 --> 01:28:20.200]  Correct?
[01:28:20.200 --> 01:28:21.200]  That is correct.
[01:28:21.200 --> 01:28:25.200]  Now, the reason that I called in, though, I have a really good friend that
[01:28:25.200 --> 01:28:29.200]  he's a nationally known, even internationally known tax honesty
[01:28:29.200 --> 01:28:34.200]  advocate who was sentenced to prison here like five years ago.
[01:28:34.200 --> 01:28:36.200]  He's still spending time in federal prison.
[01:28:36.200 --> 01:28:38.200]  Would that be Schiff?
[01:28:38.200 --> 01:28:39.200]  Well, there he goes.
[01:28:39.200 --> 01:28:41.200]  He tries to say tax and honesty.
[01:28:41.200 --> 01:28:43.200]  There is no such thing.
[01:28:43.200 --> 01:28:45.200]  They don't go together.
[01:28:45.200 --> 01:28:47.200]  They're oxymoron terms.
[01:28:47.200 --> 01:28:51.200]  I think that was Schiff's point.
[01:28:51.200 --> 01:28:54.200]  He was trying to create that.
[01:28:54.200 --> 01:28:55.200]  You know what?
[01:28:55.200 --> 01:28:57.200]  I've always been a huge admirer of his work.
[01:28:57.200 --> 01:28:59.200]  I, like I say, I know him personally.
[01:28:59.200 --> 01:29:03.200]  And as far as the tax code, there's nobody out there that knows the
[01:29:03.200 --> 01:29:05.200]  tax code better than Erwin Schiff.
[01:29:05.200 --> 01:29:09.200]  And he was absolutely right in his points.
[01:29:09.200 --> 01:29:12.200]  However, when he went into the courtroom, he was unsuccessful in his
[01:29:12.200 --> 01:29:13.200]  defense.
[01:29:13.200 --> 01:29:17.200]  And I've told him for years it's because while he may be really good
[01:29:17.200 --> 01:29:20.200]  on the tax law, he didn't understand that the judicial system that he
[01:29:20.200 --> 01:29:23.200]  was going to be tried in was administrative in nature.
[01:29:23.200 --> 01:29:27.200]  And he wasn't going to get any kind of constitutional protections.
[01:29:27.200 --> 01:29:31.200]  No, it's not because it's administrative in nature.
[01:29:31.200 --> 01:29:35.200]  It's because the courts are corrupt.
[01:29:35.200 --> 01:29:37.200]  He goes to tax courts.
[01:29:37.200 --> 01:29:39.200]  Are you having bad interest so long?
[01:29:39.200 --> 01:29:43.200]  Oh, tax court's different.
[01:29:43.200 --> 01:29:45.200]  Tax court's not reported at all.
[01:29:45.200 --> 01:29:47.200]  It's just an administrative hearing.
[01:29:47.200 --> 01:29:49.200]  This is Randy Kelton, devastated to the Craig.
[01:29:49.200 --> 01:29:51.200]  We have a lot of radio.
[01:29:51.200 --> 01:29:53.200]  We are going to break.
[01:29:53.200 --> 01:29:55.200]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[01:29:55.200 --> 01:29:57.200]  We've got two more segments.
[01:29:57.200 --> 01:30:01.200]  Give us a call, 512-646-1984.
[01:30:01.200 --> 01:30:03.200]  A noble lie.
[01:30:03.200 --> 01:30:05.200]  Oklahoma City, 1995.
[01:30:05.200 --> 01:30:08.200]  We'll change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[01:30:08.200 --> 01:30:11.200]  We're heading to the building, but the government says it's impossible.
[01:30:11.200 --> 01:30:15.200]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:30:15.200 --> 01:30:18.200]  The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals.
[01:30:18.200 --> 01:30:23.200]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:23.200 --> 01:30:25.200]  The people that did the things they did,
[01:30:25.200 --> 01:30:27.200]  they've gone on well with what they were doing.
[01:30:27.200 --> 01:30:31.200]  Expose the cover-up now at anobleye.com.
[01:30:31.200 --> 01:30:34.200]  What's your dog's real age?
[01:30:34.200 --> 01:30:36.200]  If you put that question to pet owners,
[01:30:36.200 --> 01:30:38.200]  you're likely to get a wrong answer.
[01:30:38.200 --> 01:30:40.200]  I've got your Catherine Albrecht in a moment.
[01:30:40.200 --> 01:30:44.200]  I'll tell you how to calculate a dog's equivalent human age.
[01:30:44.200 --> 01:30:46.200]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:46.200 --> 01:30:48.200]  When you give up data about yourself,
[01:30:48.200 --> 01:30:50.200]  you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:50.200 --> 01:30:52.200]  And once your privacy is gone,
[01:30:52.200 --> 01:30:55.200]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:55.200 --> 01:30:57.200]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:57.200 --> 01:31:01.200]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:31:01.200 --> 01:31:03.200]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:31:03.200 --> 01:31:06.200]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:31:06.200 --> 01:31:10.200]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:31:10.200 --> 01:31:14.200]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:31:14.200 --> 01:31:17.200]  How old is that dog in the window?
[01:31:17.200 --> 01:31:19.200]  You'll probably get the answer in calendar time,
[01:31:19.200 --> 01:31:21.200]  three weeks, six months, a year.
[01:31:21.200 --> 01:31:24.200]  But what does that mean in canine time?
[01:31:24.200 --> 01:31:27.200]  Most folks think one dog year equals seven human years,
[01:31:27.200 --> 01:31:29.200]  but it's not that simple.
[01:31:29.200 --> 01:31:33.200]  The first year of a dog's life actually equals 15 human years.
[01:31:33.200 --> 01:31:35.200]  Size and braid matter too.
[01:31:35.200 --> 01:31:37.200]  Toy dogs tend to mature faster
[01:31:37.200 --> 01:31:39.200]  and then live longer than big dogs.
[01:31:39.200 --> 01:31:41.200]  The big guys mature more slowly at first,
[01:31:41.200 --> 01:31:45.200]  but then age so fast they can be almost elderly by age five.
[01:31:45.200 --> 01:31:47.200]  Still confused?
[01:31:47.200 --> 01:31:50.200]  Do a StartPage search for dog's ages or ask your vet.
[01:31:50.200 --> 01:31:52.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:52.200 --> 01:31:57.200]  For StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:32:23.200 --> 01:32:26.200]  Okay, we're back.
[01:32:26.200 --> 01:32:29.200]  Thank you, Calvin, David, Steve, and David Craig.
[01:32:29.200 --> 01:32:31.200]  We have our video.
[01:32:31.200 --> 01:32:34.200]  We're talking to Leon in Nevada.
[01:32:34.200 --> 01:32:37.200]  Okay, Leon, we were...
[01:32:37.200 --> 01:32:40.200]  What were we talking about?
[01:32:40.200 --> 01:32:44.200]  I was curious if Mr. Schiff had any legal recourse
[01:32:44.200 --> 01:32:47.200]  after being in federal prison.
[01:32:47.200 --> 01:32:51.200]  Okay, he didn't get federal prison in a tax court.
[01:32:51.200 --> 01:32:54.200]  He got federal prison in a district court.
[01:32:54.200 --> 01:32:59.200]  So, there is an issue
[01:32:59.200 --> 01:33:05.200]  that's always bothered me about how people are fighting the tax code.
[01:33:05.200 --> 01:33:12.200]  And it goes to a legal maximum to never stipulate to anything.
[01:33:12.200 --> 01:33:18.200]  And one of the ways you stipulate to something is by silence.
[01:33:18.200 --> 01:33:23.200]  Buried in the tax code, there is an employment code.
[01:33:23.200 --> 01:33:26.200]  Do you know what your employment code is?
[01:33:26.200 --> 01:33:28.200]  No, I don't.
[01:33:28.200 --> 01:33:32.200]  It's buried in your master file.
[01:33:32.200 --> 01:33:37.200]  So, if you go to the IRS and say, show me the law,
[01:33:37.200 --> 01:33:39.200]  well, they can do that.
[01:33:39.200 --> 01:33:45.200]  Because in your tax code, by your tax code, you are a taxpayer.
[01:33:45.200 --> 01:33:52.200]  I have a friend in Austin who thinks he's an all-state insurance salesman.
[01:33:52.200 --> 01:33:56.200]  But what he really is, according to the IRS,
[01:33:56.200 --> 01:34:01.200]  tax code is he sells narcotics in the Virgin Islands.
[01:34:01.200 --> 01:34:03.200]  Right, and I've heard that in the past.
[01:34:03.200 --> 01:34:10.200]  The master tax code can have all kinds of obligations against an individual.
[01:34:10.200 --> 01:34:14.200]  Okay, guys, this one is a big, big deal.
[01:34:14.200 --> 01:34:19.200]  When you come to the IRS and say, show me the law that makes me a taxpayer,
[01:34:19.200 --> 01:34:21.200]  there it is.
[01:34:21.200 --> 01:34:28.200]  The agent looks in the master file and he finds this code in there and says,
[01:34:28.200 --> 01:34:32.200]  oh, this guy sells narcotics in the Virgin Islands.
[01:34:32.200 --> 01:34:33.200]  He's a taxpayer.
[01:34:33.200 --> 01:34:35.200]  This guy's a mechanic in Guam.
[01:34:35.200 --> 01:34:36.200]  That's one I've seen.
[01:34:36.200 --> 01:34:38.200]  I've seen all kinds of stuff.
[01:34:38.200 --> 01:34:44.200]  Well, yeah, but each one of these positions has to be one employed by the federal government.
[01:34:44.200 --> 01:34:45.200]  No, it doesn't.
[01:34:45.200 --> 01:34:47.200]  Ah, but it does.
[01:34:47.200 --> 01:34:49.200]  Not if he's in the territory.
[01:34:49.200 --> 01:34:51.200]  He's in the United States.
[01:34:51.200 --> 01:34:54.200]  He's not in one of the states.
[01:34:54.200 --> 01:34:59.200]  The territory is what makes him a taxpayer.
[01:34:59.200 --> 01:35:04.200]  That's why they put him in the territories because it makes him a taxpayer.
[01:35:04.200 --> 01:35:08.200]  He has to work on some sort of appeal or some way to defend himself.
[01:35:08.200 --> 01:35:14.200]  I was wondering if there's a different direction that he may go that might provide him a better opportunity.
[01:35:14.200 --> 01:35:16.200]  Okay, I have a question.
[01:35:16.200 --> 01:35:20.200]  What kind of indictment did they prosecute him on?
[01:35:20.200 --> 01:35:25.200]  Was it an original indictment or a superseding indictment?
[01:35:25.200 --> 01:35:27.200]  Oh, you know what?
[01:35:27.200 --> 01:35:30.200]  To be quite honest, I believe it was an original indictment.
[01:35:30.200 --> 01:35:37.200]  He was in office in Las Vegas and he began advertising nationally on Howard Stern's show, I believe it was.
[01:35:37.200 --> 01:35:43.200]  It was about three weeks later that the feds came and raided his office, took all his computers, took all his equipment and everything,
[01:35:43.200 --> 01:35:45.200]  and shortly after that he was sentenced.
[01:35:45.200 --> 01:35:49.200]  Okay, check and find out.
[01:35:49.200 --> 01:35:54.200]  If it turns out he was indicted on a superseding indictment,
[01:35:54.200 --> 01:36:05.200]  the fed, what the U.S. attorney will usually do is go in and ask for an indictment on something really minor.
[01:36:05.200 --> 01:36:19.200]  And then use the, once they get that indictment, then they use the prosecution as a way to develop evidence for other accusations,
[01:36:19.200 --> 01:36:22.200]  and then they come back with a superseding indictment.
[01:36:22.200 --> 01:36:35.200]  The problem with superseding indictment is that often the U.S. attorney will use the rubber stamp that he has with the form and the grand jury's name on it.
[01:36:35.200 --> 01:36:40.200]  So if it turns out it is a superseding indictment,
[01:36:40.200 --> 01:36:55.200]  then do a FOIA to the court recorder for the court recorders billing for their time in recording the proceedings on the day of the superseding indictment.
[01:36:55.200 --> 01:37:01.200]  If you don't find a billing, you know the prosecutor stamped it.
[01:37:01.200 --> 01:37:04.200]  That we have found.
[01:37:04.200 --> 01:37:13.200]  So it's one thing to look at, the other is I've never seen a prosecution where they followed the process.
[01:37:13.200 --> 01:37:17.200]  And honestly, you know, I think it is exactly the case that you're saying.
[01:37:17.200 --> 01:37:25.200]  I think that they actually originally charged him with one thing or, you know, detain him for one and then ended up charging him for other things.
[01:37:25.200 --> 01:37:28.200]  Okay, look at that then, that is saying.
[01:37:28.200 --> 01:37:33.200]  Perfect place to look at the standard tactic that U.S. attorneys use.
[01:37:33.200 --> 01:37:35.200]  Look at that first.
[01:37:35.200 --> 01:37:39.200]  Second, go to jurisimprudence.com.
[01:37:39.200 --> 01:37:43.200]  That's one of my websites is J-U-R-I-S.
[01:37:43.200 --> 01:37:49.200]  Imprudence I-M-P-R-U-D-E-N-C-E.com.
[01:37:49.200 --> 01:37:51.200]  Top frog on the left.
[01:37:51.200 --> 01:37:54.200]  I'm getting the Jurisdictionary.
[01:37:54.200 --> 01:37:56.200]  That sounds absolutely fantastic.
[01:37:56.200 --> 01:37:57.200]  Okay.
[01:37:57.200 --> 01:38:00.200]  Okay, go to Jurisimprudence.
[01:38:00.200 --> 01:38:08.200]  Top frog on the left and read the habeas corpus, 50-page habeas corpus.
[01:38:08.200 --> 01:38:11.200]  This is what they're supposed to do.
[01:38:11.200 --> 01:38:13.200]  It follows the federal law.
[01:38:13.200 --> 01:38:16.200]  It's written in state law, but it follows the federal law.
[01:38:16.200 --> 01:38:19.200]  A lot of the case law in there is federal.
[01:38:19.200 --> 01:38:24.200]  If they fail any of this, you can go back after them for due process violations.
[01:38:24.200 --> 01:38:26.200]  Got ya.
[01:38:26.200 --> 01:38:29.200]  And, you know, how long has he been?
[01:38:29.200 --> 01:38:33.200]  I believe it's been five, nearly six years now.
[01:38:33.200 --> 01:38:39.200]  Okay, a good due process claim, a claim of lack of subject matter jurisdiction,
[01:38:39.200 --> 01:38:43.200]  especially the superseding indictment issue.
[01:38:43.200 --> 01:38:50.200]  If he raises a good argument, they may just let him out just to get rid of it.
[01:38:50.200 --> 01:38:52.200]  Well, I certainly checked into it.
[01:38:52.200 --> 01:38:54.200]  Thank you so much for your help.
[01:38:54.200 --> 01:38:56.200]  If you need any more advice, give me a call.
[01:38:56.200 --> 01:38:59.200]  I'll do the best I can to help.
[01:38:59.200 --> 01:39:01.200]  All right, thank you so much.
[01:39:01.200 --> 01:39:02.200]  You are welcome.
[01:39:02.200 --> 01:39:08.200]  Now we're going to go to Ramon in Texas.
[01:39:08.200 --> 01:39:09.200]  There we go.
[01:39:09.200 --> 01:39:10.200]  Ramon, are you there?
[01:39:10.200 --> 01:39:12.200]  Yes, how's it going?
[01:39:12.200 --> 01:39:15.200]  Okay, what do you have for us today?
[01:39:15.200 --> 01:39:19.200]  Well, I have a problem with the landlord tenant issue.
[01:39:19.200 --> 01:39:23.200]  I leased the apartment a while ago.
[01:39:23.200 --> 01:39:27.200]  And we had an issue where we had a home invasion.
[01:39:27.200 --> 01:39:30.200]  It was two separate apartments.
[01:39:30.200 --> 01:39:36.200]  And my roommate was injured in the home invasion, and he was able to move out.
[01:39:36.200 --> 01:39:42.200]  And right now I have a collection for about $2,800.
[01:39:42.200 --> 01:39:48.200]  And because I moved out, we had been talking to the management of the company,
[01:39:48.200 --> 01:39:53.200]  and then we talked to the upper management somewhere in Sioux Falls.
[01:39:53.200 --> 01:39:59.200]  And we were talking to them, and they finally talked to my mom,
[01:39:59.200 --> 01:40:03.200]  and they said that they were going to give her some kind of final decision.
[01:40:03.200 --> 01:40:07.200]  And when they finally gave me the decision, I had already moved into another place.
[01:40:07.200 --> 01:40:12.200]  I just had my keys still, and then I went to turn in the keys.
[01:40:12.200 --> 01:40:19.200]  They said that I had abandoned the place, but I still turned in the keys into a key packet or whatever.
[01:40:19.200 --> 01:40:26.200]  And there's a collection on my account now, and I just don't know what to do anymore.
[01:40:26.200 --> 01:40:31.200]  Okay, okay. Do they have a judgment against you?
[01:40:31.200 --> 01:40:36.200]  No, actually, I haven't gotten any kind of judgment paper work. I haven't been served.
[01:40:36.200 --> 01:40:43.200]  Okay, then is someone trying to collect money from you?
[01:40:43.200 --> 01:40:47.200]  Yeah, but it's not directly the company. It's with the collections.
[01:40:47.200 --> 01:40:51.200]  Okay, it's with the collections? Oh, good. That's even better.
[01:40:51.200 --> 01:40:54.200]  Okay, go to Rule of Law Radio.
[01:40:54.200 --> 01:41:02.200]  I haven't seen the link on logos, but I know the link is on Rule of Law Radio.
[01:41:02.200 --> 01:41:09.200]  It's a blue banner. Click on that and get the Michael Maris package.
[01:41:09.200 --> 01:41:16.200]  He will show you how to make them pay you to go away and leave them alone.
[01:41:16.200 --> 01:41:22.200]  $2,800, piece of cake. So get his method.
[01:41:22.200 --> 01:41:31.200]  He will use the Faraday Collections Practices Act to give you a much larger claim against them than they have against you.
[01:41:31.200 --> 01:41:42.200]  And we have people consistently getting the collection agencies to retire the debt, clear their credit,
[01:41:42.200 --> 01:41:52.200]  and go away and leave them alone just to get our guys to leave the collection agencies alone.
[01:41:52.200 --> 01:42:08.200]  Is it some kind of a, is it under the FICA, you know, the FARA, or is it the FARA?
[01:42:08.200 --> 01:42:12.200]  Okay, wait, wait, wait. You're taking way too long. We're running out of time here.
[01:42:12.200 --> 01:42:19.200]  It starts with a debt validation letter. I can't explain it all to you here on the air.
[01:42:19.200 --> 01:42:23.200]  You need more than just an explanation here to be able to fight this thing.
[01:42:23.200 --> 01:42:29.200]  Go there, look at that, talk to Mike. He will help you fix this, make it go away.
[01:42:29.200 --> 01:42:31.200]  Okay.
[01:42:31.200 --> 01:42:37.200]  Okay, we've got one more caller we're going to try to get to really quick before we run out of time.
[01:42:37.200 --> 01:42:43.200]  Okay, Clyde, go quickly. We've just got a minute and 20 seconds.
[01:42:43.200 --> 01:42:45.200]  Okay, I'll make it quick. Can you hear me?
[01:42:45.200 --> 01:42:47.200]  Yes.
[01:42:47.200 --> 01:42:51.200]  Oh, thank God. I've got a traffic ticket in the court.
[01:42:51.200 --> 01:42:56.200]  I put it in there. You guys referred me back to a gentleman here in California. I'm out of California.
[01:42:56.200 --> 01:43:03.200]  It's crossing a double line. I'm just, you know, it's not a big deal, but I, to the point after this new case, I want to just...
[01:43:03.200 --> 01:43:08.200]  Okay, wait, wait, wait. We've run way too long. We're going to run out before you can get the question out.
[01:43:08.200 --> 01:43:09.200]  I'm in a motion to...
[01:43:09.200 --> 01:43:11.200]  Down to 50 seconds.
[01:43:11.200 --> 01:43:14.200]  Call us, call back Monday. That's our...
[01:43:14.200 --> 01:43:17.200]  Well, Randy, we've got one more segment. You're still going too fast.
[01:43:17.200 --> 01:43:19.200]  I can't take it. My clock is...
[01:43:19.200 --> 01:43:21.200]  We've got another segment. I'm sorry.
[01:43:21.200 --> 01:43:24.200]  Clyde, just hang on. We'll catch on the other side this break. Okay?
[01:43:24.200 --> 01:43:25.200]  Okay.
[01:43:25.200 --> 01:43:32.200]  All right, we'll be right back. All right, folks, this is going to be an interesting evening if Randy keeps time warping on us.
[01:43:32.200 --> 01:43:34.200]  Yeah, of course.
[01:43:34.200 --> 01:43:40.200]  Well, it's me. I'm moving my page down so all I'm seeing is the bottom part.
[01:43:40.200 --> 01:43:44.200]  I'm having one of those days. You get old, it just happens.
[01:43:44.200 --> 01:43:46.200]  This is Randy, Captain, David, Steve, and Craig.
[01:43:46.200 --> 01:43:48.200]  We have the radio.
[01:43:48.200 --> 01:43:52.200]  We'll be right back. We'll see you in a minute or so.
[01:43:52.200 --> 01:43:55.200]  And I haven't even drank my beer.
[01:43:55.200 --> 01:43:57.200]  Maybe you should start.
[01:43:57.200 --> 01:43:58.200]  Here, I'm back.
[01:43:58.200 --> 01:44:10.200]  At hempusa.org, we offer chemical-free products to people around the world, detoxifying, self-healing while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:44:10.200 --> 01:44:15.200]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest-selling product, micro-plant powder.
[01:44:15.200 --> 01:44:25.200]  Our micro-plant powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc, and silica to help rebuild the immune system and to create a healthy stalk flora.
[01:44:25.200 --> 01:44:29.200]  Plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:44:29.200 --> 01:44:33.200]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org.
[01:44:33.200 --> 01:44:37.200]  And remember, all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:44:37.200 --> 01:44:42.200]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality, and rapid shipping anywhere.
[01:44:42.200 --> 01:44:46.200]  And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:44:46.200 --> 01:44:55.200]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608. That's 908-6912608.
[01:44:55.200 --> 01:45:01.200]  See what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:45:01.200 --> 01:45:04.200]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.200 --> 01:45:16.200]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.200 --> 01:45:19.200]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.200 --> 01:45:23.200]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.200 --> 01:45:28.200]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.200 --> 01:45:34.200]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.200 --> 01:45:43.200]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.200 --> 01:45:52.200]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.200 --> 01:46:01.200]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.200 --> 01:46:51.200]  All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:51.200 --> 01:47:00.200]  And we are going to finish up with our caller here. Let's see if I can get back to the caller board any time soon.
[01:47:00.200 --> 01:47:02.200]  All right, Clyde, go ahead.
[01:47:02.200 --> 01:47:05.200]  Okay, we'll take a look. I won't try to rush this so much.
[01:47:05.200 --> 01:47:12.200]  I got an infraction from our California Highway Patrol on a country road for crossing over a 00 line.
[01:47:12.200 --> 01:47:18.200]  It isn't a biggie on it, but I'm just to the point where I'm fed up with all the things and listening to you guys.
[01:47:18.200 --> 01:47:22.200]  I got your course, but I think one of the things, I'm going to stay here.
[01:47:22.200 --> 01:47:31.200]  You stated you took 11 years to get this all together, and here I am under a two-week kind of thing, and I'm doing as much as I can, but anyhow.
[01:47:31.200 --> 01:47:41.200]  You referred me to some gentleman here in California, and he gave me the information on a motion to quash on the basis of improper service.
[01:47:41.200 --> 01:47:53.200]  I sent that in and was denied. I also filed a discovery request with the DAA and hand-delivered that and got a stamp in to file that with the clerk, and that's there.
[01:47:53.200 --> 01:48:02.200]  Well, don't stop harping on the notice issue. The course is going to almost always deny notice. The problem is you can waive notice.
[01:48:02.200 --> 01:48:11.200]  So be very careful not to sign any paperwork or anything of that type that would accidentally do that without your knowledge.
[01:48:11.200 --> 01:48:12.200]  Okay.
[01:48:12.200 --> 01:48:16.200]  Okay. One issue. You said the judge denied your motion.
[01:48:16.200 --> 01:48:18.200]  The motion to quash.
[01:48:18.200 --> 01:48:22.200]  Did you ask for findings of fact and conclusions at law?
[01:48:22.200 --> 01:48:32.200]  Not in, no, that particular one, and it was a, what do they call it here? It was under, I didn't actually go to court and do it.
[01:48:32.200 --> 01:48:36.200]  Oh, what do they call it? I'm not familiar with it. It was...
[01:48:36.200 --> 01:48:39.200]  Okay. We don't care how he was.
[01:48:39.200 --> 01:48:43.200]  Defended in the error. So I wasn't actually in the court making a point.
[01:48:43.200 --> 01:48:48.200]  Doesn't matter. Hold on. We don't care about any of that. We care about the fact that he rendered a ruling.
[01:48:48.200 --> 01:48:56.200]  Mm-hmm. You want to know what facts he used and what law he applied to the facts.
[01:48:56.200 --> 01:48:57.200]  Okay.
[01:48:57.200 --> 01:49:00.200]  That's what you're asking for and he'll ignore it.
[01:49:00.200 --> 01:49:01.200]  Mm-hmm.
[01:49:01.200 --> 01:49:11.200]  The problem he has is that's a ministerial duty. It denies you in your right and ability to appeal because you don't know what to appeal.
[01:49:11.200 --> 01:49:12.200]  Okay.
[01:49:12.200 --> 01:49:18.200]  If you file a, immediately file a judicial conduct complaint against him, check and see if he carries a bar card.
[01:49:18.200 --> 01:49:21.200]  If he's a municipal court judge, he almost certainly does.
[01:49:21.200 --> 01:49:22.200]  Okay.
[01:49:22.200 --> 01:49:24.200]  And file a bar grievance against him as well.
[01:49:24.200 --> 01:49:25.200]  Okay.
[01:49:25.200 --> 01:49:28.200]  Oh, raise the stakes on these guys.
[01:49:28.200 --> 01:49:29.200]  Okay.
[01:49:29.200 --> 01:49:32.200]  Find out who the prosecutor is, file one against him.
[01:49:32.200 --> 01:49:36.200]  Go to bar grievance.net.
[01:49:36.200 --> 01:49:44.200]  Okay.
[01:49:44.200 --> 01:49:45.200]  Okay.
[01:49:45.200 --> 01:49:46.200]  It's not complete.
[01:49:46.200 --> 01:49:51.200]  The size is not complete yet, but the codes are up there.
[01:49:51.200 --> 01:49:54.200]  Go to the left side.
[01:49:54.200 --> 01:50:05.200]  About the middle of the page, there's a link to the American Bar Association standards for the model standards for the prosecutorial function.
[01:50:05.200 --> 01:50:06.200]  Okay.
[01:50:06.200 --> 01:50:10.200]  It's done in a questionnaire format.
[01:50:10.200 --> 01:50:11.200]  Mm-hmm.
[01:50:11.200 --> 01:50:19.200]  And it's the first time too, so I've got some errors in there, so if you're going through it and you find any errors, mark them out for me and email back to me so I can go in and fix it.
[01:50:19.200 --> 01:50:20.200]  Okay.
[01:50:20.200 --> 01:50:25.200]  Walk down through those. You'll be surprised at all the stuff you can kick the crap out of the prosecutor for.
[01:50:25.200 --> 01:50:26.200]  Okay.
[01:50:26.200 --> 01:50:38.200]  And bar grievance, the prosecutor at every opportunity, judicial conduct, complain the judge at every opportunity in California, at least the bar grievances remain public.
[01:50:38.200 --> 01:50:39.200]  Okay.
[01:50:39.200 --> 01:50:44.200]  If they want to give you a hard time, turn it back on them.
[01:50:44.200 --> 01:50:47.200]  Every one of these things marks their career.
[01:50:47.200 --> 01:50:49.200]  They never go away.
[01:50:49.200 --> 01:50:50.200]  Okay.
[01:50:50.200 --> 01:50:54.200]  So raise the stakes, give them a reason to make this thing go away.
[01:50:54.200 --> 01:50:56.200]  Okay.
[01:50:56.200 --> 01:50:57.200]  I'll shut up.
[01:50:57.200 --> 01:50:58.200]  No, no.
[01:50:58.200 --> 01:51:01.200]  I can't do it this weekend and I'm supposed to be in court all day.
[01:51:01.200 --> 01:51:09.200]  They shortened my time after extension and after they denied the motion, they come back and I'm supposed to be in court now on Tuesday this next week.
[01:51:09.200 --> 01:51:11.200]  First thing in the morning.
[01:51:11.200 --> 01:51:13.200]  So I really don't have a whole lot of time.
[01:51:13.200 --> 01:51:14.200]  So what do I do?
[01:51:14.200 --> 01:51:17.200]  I just ask for an extension now in court again.
[01:51:17.200 --> 01:51:18.200]  Neither.
[01:51:18.200 --> 01:51:32.200]  No, you're going to continue to pound on the lack of notice issue. Normally what they will do is the judge will tell you that you have X number of minutes to record any outstanding objections on the record if they even have a record.
[01:51:32.200 --> 01:51:40.200]  But I would go in there breathing fire, objection, lack of jurisdiction, no proper notice.
[01:51:40.200 --> 01:51:42.200]  Okay.
[01:51:42.200 --> 01:51:48.200]  Okay, I see you nod.
[01:51:48.200 --> 01:51:51.200]  I'm doing this verbally, right?
[01:51:51.200 --> 01:51:53.200]  Say it again.
[01:51:53.200 --> 01:52:00.200]  If you know this is an issue, have you already filed a motion to that effect?
[01:52:00.200 --> 01:52:02.200]  For lack of jurisdiction?
[01:52:02.200 --> 01:52:03.200]  Yes.
[01:52:03.200 --> 01:52:04.200]  No.
[01:52:04.200 --> 01:52:05.200]  Okay.
[01:52:05.200 --> 01:52:08.200]  Make up a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:52:08.200 --> 01:52:10.200]  Okay.
[01:52:10.200 --> 01:52:12.200]  Yeah, there is no notice.
[01:52:12.200 --> 01:52:20.200]  There is no impersonal and there is no subject matter failure to provide notice to prize the court of all jurisdiction.
[01:52:20.200 --> 01:52:21.200]  Okay.
[01:52:21.200 --> 01:52:24.200]  They cannot deprive you of the right of notice.
[01:52:24.200 --> 01:52:38.200]  Just for yuck, she might file a motion to recuse the judge for acts in violation of his oath of office and of the laws of the state of California.
[01:52:38.200 --> 01:52:40.200]  Okay.
[01:52:40.200 --> 01:52:46.200]  Accused him of denying you your right to a fair jurist in the first instance.
[01:52:46.200 --> 01:52:48.200]  Okay.
[01:52:48.200 --> 01:52:53.200]  This is all going to be on the Internet by Monday so I can re-listen to it.
[01:52:53.200 --> 01:52:54.200]  I'm taking those.
[01:52:54.200 --> 01:52:58.200]  Okay, go to jurismprudence.com.
[01:52:58.200 --> 01:52:59.200]  Okay, look at that.
[01:52:59.200 --> 01:53:00.200]  Uh-huh.
[01:53:00.200 --> 01:53:18.200]  And look under Cherokee County, I have got a couple of motions to disqualify and I talk about disqualification there in terms of Texas law, but they're almost identical in California law.
[01:53:18.200 --> 01:53:28.200]  Or better yet, just go on the Internet and do a search for recuse judge California and you'll get the code.
[01:53:28.200 --> 01:53:34.200]  Any judge is generally, I'm not sure about California, but it almost certainly will be.
[01:53:34.200 --> 01:53:42.200]  A judge cannot rule on his own motion, challenging him his impartiality.
[01:53:42.200 --> 01:53:44.200]  Okay.
[01:53:44.200 --> 01:53:45.200]  You're biased judge.
[01:53:45.200 --> 01:53:46.200]  Oh no, I'm not biased.
[01:53:46.200 --> 01:53:49.200]  You know, what's wrong with that picture?
[01:53:49.200 --> 01:53:56.200]  So generally when one is filed, someone else has to be appointed to hear the motion.
[01:53:56.200 --> 01:53:57.200]  Gotcha.
[01:53:57.200 --> 01:54:04.200]  What I like to do is they want to run out and get another judge to come in and rule against your motion.
[01:54:04.200 --> 01:54:05.200]  Uh-huh.
[01:54:05.200 --> 01:54:11.200]  And then you want to have made up a plea and abatement.
[01:54:11.200 --> 01:54:18.200]  Asking the court to abate the proceedings until you can appeal the recusal issue.
[01:54:18.200 --> 01:54:19.200]  Okay.
[01:54:19.200 --> 01:54:22.200]  That'll jerk a knot in their shorts.
[01:54:22.200 --> 01:54:30.200]  Okay, what abatement is, it doesn't take any special legal knowledge to do abatement.
[01:54:30.200 --> 01:54:40.200]  Abatement is you're asking the court to abate all proceedings until an issue can be adjudicated.
[01:54:40.200 --> 01:54:50.200]  The failure to do so will waste the time of the court and potentially cost the court money when they will lose the issue anyway.
[01:54:50.200 --> 01:55:02.200]  So to protect the taxpayers' money, then the court should abate these proceedings until you're appeal of the motion to recuse is heard by the court.
[01:55:02.200 --> 01:55:03.200]  Okay.
[01:55:03.200 --> 01:55:05.200]  It's earned.
[01:55:05.200 --> 01:55:07.200]  Yeah, deemed by court.
[01:55:07.200 --> 01:55:08.200]  Okay.
[01:55:08.200 --> 01:55:13.200]  Uh, one other quick question, and I'll let you guys go to somebody else if I'm not using all your time here.
[01:55:13.200 --> 01:55:16.200]  When I got your court, of course, everything is basically in Texas law.
[01:55:16.200 --> 01:55:21.200]  I went and read or scammed through, best I could, the California vehicle code.
[01:55:21.200 --> 01:55:27.200]  And the first thing I went looking for was the definitions, and they seem to be very short.
[01:55:27.200 --> 01:55:32.200]  Do you know, do they put that on the Internet and leave off a lot of stuff?
[01:55:32.200 --> 01:55:36.200]  Do I need to go down to the law library and look at it that way?
[01:55:36.200 --> 01:55:42.200]  I always go to the law library, and the law librarian will save you a tremendous amount of time.
[01:55:42.200 --> 01:55:43.200]  Okay, great.
[01:55:43.200 --> 01:55:44.200]  Great.
[01:55:44.200 --> 01:55:48.200]  Yeah, I can cross-referencing, I just, I kind of got stumbled there, you know, stuck there.
[01:55:48.200 --> 01:55:49.200]  So, okay.
[01:55:49.200 --> 01:55:56.200]  All right, you've given me a ton and a half information along with what you guys are doing, and let's keep it up.
[01:55:56.200 --> 01:56:07.200]  Okay, now we want to go to Phil, and we want to talk about the cost recovery notice.
[01:56:07.200 --> 01:56:08.200]  What are you telling us about?
[01:56:08.200 --> 01:56:10.200]  That's one of my favorite documents in there.
[01:56:10.200 --> 01:56:11.200]  Really?
[01:56:11.200 --> 01:56:17.200]  Well, cost recovery notice does a few things, actually.
[01:56:17.200 --> 01:56:24.200]  It is a deep validation notice in itself.
[01:56:24.200 --> 01:56:26.200]  Why don't we get it up?
[01:56:26.200 --> 01:56:38.200]  You know, if people are on the website, go to AussieLaw.com, and you should be under the Phil Free Queensland.
[01:56:38.200 --> 01:56:41.200]  You'll see the cost recovery notice if you want.
[01:56:41.200 --> 01:56:43.200]  You can click on that.
[01:56:43.200 --> 01:56:50.200]  Now, okay, basically what this does is anyone's making any demands of you enough.
[01:56:50.200 --> 01:56:51.200]  Hold on.
[01:56:51.200 --> 01:56:53.200]  Well, it's AussieLaw.net.
[01:56:53.200 --> 01:56:55.200]  AussieLaw.net, I'm sorry.
[01:56:55.200 --> 01:56:56.200]  Okay.
[01:56:56.200 --> 01:57:01.200]  So, AussieLaw.net, and yep.
[01:57:01.200 --> 01:57:07.200]  So, if you're there, AussieLaw.net, then you can go to Queensland.
[01:57:07.200 --> 01:57:08.200]  Yep.
[01:57:08.200 --> 01:57:09.200]  Queensland.
[01:57:09.200 --> 01:57:10.200]  Phil Free.
[01:57:10.200 --> 01:57:18.200]  Underneath Phil Free, you'll see a cost recovery notice, and we can go through that if people
[01:57:18.200 --> 01:57:19.200]  are on internet.
[01:57:19.200 --> 01:57:24.200]  If not, just make a note of it, or when you can, or when you get home, or if you're driving.
[01:57:24.200 --> 01:57:29.200]  You can look it up.
[01:57:29.200 --> 01:57:36.200]  Now, a little bit about how to use a cost recovery notice.
[01:57:36.200 --> 01:57:45.200]  Now, when someone's contacting you to pay a debt, or debt allegedly, always use the word
[01:57:45.200 --> 01:57:49.200]  alleged, allegedly owed, who is that entity commenting?
[01:57:49.200 --> 01:57:56.200]  Do you owe the debt to that person that's contacting you, or are they contacting you to say, hey,
[01:57:56.200 --> 01:58:01.200]  pay that debt on behalf of whoever I'm supposed to be representing?
[01:58:01.200 --> 01:58:02.200]  Okay.
[01:58:02.200 --> 01:58:04.200]  So, think about this.
[01:58:04.200 --> 01:58:13.200]  When you nominate someone as your agent to regarding a debt, why do you do this?
[01:58:13.200 --> 01:58:19.600]  Well, it takes all the emotion out of it for a start, and the very entities that are trying
[01:58:19.600 --> 01:58:25.200]  to make you do something, they have to go through somebody else first to get to you, so it's
[01:58:25.200 --> 01:58:26.200]  a protection player.
[01:58:26.200 --> 01:58:30.200]  So, if you want to get to me, you have to go through Randy.
[01:58:30.200 --> 01:58:34.200]  Exactly, we'll play it more about that.
[01:58:34.200 --> 01:58:38.200]  This trip longer will be extended if you are out of time.
[01:58:38.200 --> 01:58:41.200]  Well, we'll have to get back to it maybe next time around.
[01:58:41.200 --> 01:58:42.200]  Yes.
[01:58:42.200 --> 01:58:43.200]  Okay.
[01:58:43.200 --> 01:58:45.200]  This is Randy Kelton, Debussy and David Craig.
[01:58:45.200 --> 01:58:46.200]  We live on radio.
[01:58:46.200 --> 01:58:47.200]  We'll be back.
[01:58:47.200 --> 01:58:51.200]  Deborah and Eddie will be back Monday on our traffic show.
[01:58:51.200 --> 01:59:01.200]  Thank you for listening and good night.
[01:59:01.200 --> 01:59:07.360]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:59:07.360 --> 01:59:08.360]  Recovery Version.
[01:59:08.360 --> 01:59:13.520]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:13.520 --> 01:59:19.200]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:19.200 --> 01:59:27.800]  For your free copy today from Bibles for America, call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us
[01:59:27.800 --> 01:59:31.440]  online at bfa.org.
[01:59:31.440 --> 01:59:36.960]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:59:36.960 --> 01:59:41.000]  charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:43.520]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:43.520 --> 01:59:51.840]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:51.840 --> 02:00:17.520]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.