ROL_2012-01-20_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:04.960]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[00:04.960 --> 00:10.840]  Mali's military said Thursday its armed forces had killed 45 gunmen and lost two soldiers
[00:10.840 --> 00:14.640]  in attacks on two northern towns this week.
[00:14.640 --> 00:19.120]  Clashes which started Wednesday after earlier fighting further south Tuesday killed several
[00:19.120 --> 00:20.240]  others.
[00:20.240 --> 00:25.280]  This week's fighting ended several years of peace in Mali's desert north and appeared
[00:25.280 --> 00:30.600]  to confirm fears Libya's war would spread instability as the gunmen previously employed
[00:30.600 --> 00:33.360]  by the Libyan army returned home.
[00:33.360 --> 00:40.320]  A UK appeals court Thursday ruled the police tactic of catalling protesters used extensively
[00:40.320 --> 00:44.920]  during the G20 protests in London three years ago is legitimate.
[00:44.920 --> 00:49.160]  The court overturned a previous ruling by the High Court on the technique of corraling
[00:49.160 --> 00:55.120]  demonstrators with netting deployed to contain demonstrators during a climate camp sit-in.
[00:55.120 --> 01:02.480]  The case concerned bystander Ian Tomlinson who died after being struck by an officer.
[01:02.480 --> 01:07.360]  France Friday suspended military training operations in Afghanistan and said it was
[01:07.360 --> 01:12.760]  considering whether to withdraw its entire force early after four French soldiers were
[01:12.760 --> 01:14.760]  killed by an Afghan soldier.
[01:14.760 --> 01:19.280]  The shootings Friday were the latest of several in which Western soldiers have been killed
[01:19.280 --> 01:24.120]  by members of the Afghan security forces.
[01:24.120 --> 01:29.200]  Hundreds of people in Chalki, a town in north-eastern Afghanistan Thursday, took to the streets
[01:29.200 --> 01:35.160]  to protest a night raid by Afghan and NATO forces they said killed six civilians Monday.
[01:35.160 --> 01:40.720]  Kunar province governor Fazlullah Wadi said a woman and a child were among the dead.
[01:40.720 --> 01:46.080]  US-led coalition troops launched regular night-time kill-and-capture raids but repeated civilian
[01:46.080 --> 01:49.600]  deaths have provoked anger among the Afghan public.
[01:49.600 --> 01:54.280]  The international security assistance force has defended the operations claiming they cause
[01:54.280 --> 01:56.840]  fewer than one percent of civilian casualties.
[01:56.840 --> 02:03.520]  However, a recent analysis by Interpress Service showed US special forces killed nearly 1600
[02:03.520 --> 02:12.240]  Afghan civilians in over 6,200 night raids between May 2010 and February 2011.
[02:12.240 --> 02:18.840]  Virtual charter schools which offer classes solely online expanded enormously last year.
[02:18.840 --> 02:24.160]  State legislators across the country are passing laws to expand cyber schools at the behest
[02:24.160 --> 02:29.800]  of privatization advocates and online education companies with little regulation.
[02:29.800 --> 02:36.080]  Ohio lifted a moratorium on new e-schools and Utah passed a virtual voucher law which
[02:36.080 --> 02:41.680]  lets high schoolers determine which classes they prefer to take online and at school.
[02:41.680 --> 02:46.720]  Florida now mandates high school students enroll in a minimum of one online course and
[02:46.720 --> 02:50.000]  Idaho has moved to require at least two.
[02:50.000 --> 02:55.360]  More than 200,000 kindergarten to 12th grade students are enrolled in full-time virtual
[02:55.360 --> 02:58.720]  charter schools in at least 40 states.
[02:58.720 --> 03:04.000]  Five for-profit companies control the cyber school market and have lobbied state legislatures
[03:04.000 --> 03:09.760]  hard piggybacking on the school privatization movement which pushes publicly funded charter
[03:09.760 --> 03:11.760]  schools and school vouchers.
[03:11.760 --> 03:40.760]  More details on this story is at INSworldreport.net.
[03:40.760 --> 03:52.200]  We're talking to Kim Magnuson about the State Commission on Judicial Conduct and the sunset
[03:52.200 --> 03:54.200]  hearings that are coming up this April.
[03:54.200 --> 03:57.200]  Okay, Kim, do you want to go ahead?
[03:57.200 --> 04:02.920]  Okay, well at this point, you know, most of it's a case of what I've been saying for
[04:02.920 --> 04:08.200]  the last 10 years for people who have heard my voice is that you need to file judicial
[04:08.200 --> 04:15.560]  complaints and copies of those complaints need to be sent to either myself or Randy
[04:15.560 --> 04:18.600]  in order to perpetuate the fact that it happened.
[04:18.600 --> 04:21.680]  If you don't send us a copy, we don't know what happened.
[04:21.680 --> 04:26.160]  I've talked to dozens of people over the year that said I sent in a complaint and they basically
[04:26.160 --> 04:32.080]  dismissed it and I threw it away and nobody sent a copy to me or even tells me about it.
[04:32.080 --> 04:36.160]  The biggest problem we have with judicial complaints is the fact that it doesn't really
[04:36.160 --> 04:41.000]  get you anything except it complains about the judge's background and what they're doing
[04:41.000 --> 04:45.840]  and maybe they'll do something about that judge, but right now it would look like that
[04:45.840 --> 04:53.920]  the agency's biggest job is to be the PR representatives for the courts in making it the facade of
[04:53.920 --> 05:01.200]  justice appear that it's complete in the state of Texas where the agency's actual goal is
[05:01.200 --> 05:06.680]  not what its public statement is, it's quite the opposite.
[05:06.680 --> 05:11.440]  So the issue at this point in time is that we need to go ahead and make sure we collect
[05:11.440 --> 05:15.800]  all of the complaints that have been filed and people that have filed them and threw
[05:15.800 --> 05:21.360]  them away right to the agency and ask them for a copy because they want to testify before
[05:21.360 --> 05:25.640]  the Sunset Commission, but you've got to send us a copy of the letter and the request and
[05:25.640 --> 05:30.160]  the affidavit and the green card so we can show that you sent the letter requesting
[05:30.160 --> 05:31.160]  your documents.
[05:31.160 --> 05:36.360]  Now, I believe if it goes back too many years, let them send you a letter sent to this effect,
[05:36.360 --> 05:40.680]  but I think if it goes back too many years, they're required to destroy them, but if you
[05:40.680 --> 05:45.480]  request it and they never answer you, I think that's a problem.
[05:45.480 --> 05:50.040]  This has been the problem of this agency for a long time and I'm going to tell a story
[05:50.040 --> 05:56.440]  of Brenda Anderson getting in County a number of years ago back in the 1990s since she had
[05:56.440 --> 06:03.000]  a really intense divorce case up there before a judge, John Narcissus, who is now a retired
[06:03.000 --> 06:09.400]  senior judge and basically his premise and attitude towards law is pretty much the same
[06:09.400 --> 06:13.440]  as it was back then, which is, you know, do whatever you want.
[06:13.440 --> 06:19.040]  So in any event, she filed a grievance against him back in the early 90s and by the time
[06:19.040 --> 06:25.520]  the agency got around to hearing it and they used to actually have hearings and he got
[06:25.520 --> 06:31.240]  to be called to the library in Denton County where they held this hearing and she was admonished
[06:31.240 --> 06:44.800]  why was she trying to ruin this, you know, MNJURIS career and what, you know, since she
[06:44.800 --> 06:47.800]  was the only one that had complained.
[06:47.800 --> 06:53.320]  So in any event, by the time they had the hearings, she had collected 11 other complaints
[06:53.320 --> 06:56.040]  from Denton County on the same judge.
[06:56.040 --> 07:00.720]  The Judicial Conduct Commission, chairing at that time, was more interested in how she
[07:00.720 --> 07:06.960]  got the other 11 copies of other complaints than it was the fact that she had just lied
[07:06.960 --> 07:10.200]  saying she was the only one that had complained.
[07:10.200 --> 07:12.320]  This is what this agency is all about.
[07:12.320 --> 07:19.280]  This agency is about obfuscation and covering up the process by which judicial corruption
[07:19.280 --> 07:26.280]  is essentially furthered in the state of Texas, so we need to do whatever we can to
[07:26.280 --> 07:27.280]  get complaints.
[07:27.280 --> 07:33.200]  Yeah, that's why we call it a public relations agency for the judges.
[07:33.200 --> 07:35.960]  They're here to run interference.
[07:35.960 --> 07:43.480]  They're here to intercept our complaints and make them go away, so we need to get them
[07:43.480 --> 07:44.560]  flushed out of there.
[07:44.560 --> 07:53.520]  I am about to file a set of complaints with the Judicial Conduct Commission on the Cherokee
[07:53.520 --> 08:01.320]  County issue, and in doing that, I have a special present for them.
[08:01.320 --> 08:07.200]  I've talked about this before, that I will be filing a set of criminal complaints along
[08:07.200 --> 08:13.640]  with the Judicial Conduct complaint, and the criminal complaints will be attached as I
[08:13.640 --> 08:19.160]  have it to affidavits in support of my claim.
[08:19.160 --> 08:27.440]  The problem is to have two judges on the commission, and when those judges receive those verified
[08:27.440 --> 08:33.320]  criminal affidavits and fail to perform their duty as magistrates, we're going to go to the
[08:33.320 --> 08:41.760]  grand jury on them, see if I can get a grand jury to agree with my position, that a judge
[08:41.760 --> 08:45.040]  is always a magistrate.
[08:45.040 --> 08:55.240]  Now, he may not always be sitting as a judge, but he's always available as a magistrate,
[08:55.240 --> 09:01.640]  and while acting in the performance of his normal duties, and because of the performance
[09:01.640 --> 09:07.640]  of his normal duties, he had it made known to him that crimes had been committed, I will
[09:07.640 --> 09:15.720]  maintain that Article 2.10 Code of Criminal Procedure invoked a duty on his part, and
[09:15.720 --> 09:24.520]  if he fails to perform that duty, that will have the effect of shielding these individuals
[09:24.520 --> 09:32.360]  from prosecution, and if he says one word to me about it, obstruction of justice and
[09:32.360 --> 09:37.840]  tampering with the witness, like they did to Brenda Anderson, if they'd done that to
[09:37.840 --> 09:45.840]  me, I'd have been called a 9-1-1, because I'm a witness for government tribunal, and
[09:45.840 --> 09:51.720]  if they tried to do anything to tamper with my testimony, I consider that a violation
[09:51.720 --> 10:00.960]  of 36.05 Texas penal code, and that is a felony in the state of Texas, so I'm hoping that
[10:00.960 --> 10:05.240]  when they get my complaints that they do what they normally do, because these are really
[10:05.240 --> 10:15.600]  a horrible set of complaints, so when they refuse to do what they are required to do,
[10:15.600 --> 10:22.960]  then I get to run the routine on them through Travis County, and push to get them to present
[10:22.960 --> 10:31.880]  it to Grand Jury, and we're hoping that that will get their attention. I suspect that it
[10:31.880 --> 10:36.800]  won't, it'll take more than that, and I'm hoping that I can encourage some other folks
[10:36.800 --> 10:46.240]  to similar things, but this is the plan I have laid out for them, and I really am trying
[10:46.240 --> 10:52.640]  to get Jesus of conduct up. When I get that up, I'm going to want everybody to start filling
[10:52.640 --> 10:57.400]  out complaints, and if I have someone out there who has some time that can help me do
[10:57.400 --> 11:06.800]  it, I sure could use a volunteer. I have to take the canons of judicial ethics and convert
[11:06.800 --> 11:13.400]  them into a questionnaire, and once that's done, then it's relatively simple to write
[11:13.400 --> 11:21.320]  the code to teach the system how to produce the output complaint, and we will have it
[11:21.320 --> 11:28.800]  so that you can go online, fill out the questionnaire, and then it will produce the complaint in
[11:28.800 --> 11:37.680]  a PDF format that you can just download, print, sign, and send, but it'll also save a copy
[11:37.680 --> 11:44.560]  on our website with the title of the page, the name of the judge, so if anybody does
[11:44.560 --> 11:50.000]  a search for that judge's name, they'll get a hit right on the complaint. So while the
[11:50.000 --> 11:56.800]  Judicial Conduct Commission may not do anything about it, judicialconduct.com will, and that's
[11:56.800 --> 12:06.040]  what will be the site name. Okay, Ken, what do you suggest people do, or how do we go
[12:06.040 --> 12:15.480]  about filing a judicial conduct complaint? Well, the first process is to make sure that
[12:15.480 --> 12:22.240]  you look through the judicial canons of ethics and site conduct complaints that the issues
[12:22.240 --> 12:29.040]  that are premier in requiring the judge to do something or refrain from doing something,
[12:29.040 --> 12:34.600]  it's a mandatory shall or shall not or must or must not. The best way to do this is go
[12:34.600 --> 12:39.320]  off to the judicial conduct website and look at their reports on who they've disciplined
[12:39.320 --> 12:43.880]  before and look at the way they've listed the facts of what they did and why they did
[12:43.880 --> 12:48.040]  it. They'll list the canons of ethics that were violated, see if that applies in your
[12:48.040 --> 12:55.360]  case to use the same language as the commission used in your complaint. The aspect of what
[12:55.360 --> 13:00.080]  actually took place, the more documents you can attach. Now, I'm not just saying blindly
[13:00.080 --> 13:05.960]  attach documents, you have to pretend you're a prosecutor. I really hate the fact that
[13:05.960 --> 13:10.840]  the state of Texas and the government in general has put us in the place of trying to act like
[13:10.840 --> 13:17.720]  district attorneys in writing a complaint against a judge that's sufficient enough to trigger
[13:17.720 --> 13:23.880]  any serious consideration by this agency. But the better you write it, the more likely
[13:23.880 --> 13:28.280]  it is going to be heard and the more ammunition that it gives me if they don't do anything
[13:28.280 --> 13:34.280]  with it. The more complete and you've got to pretend that the commission doesn't know
[13:34.280 --> 13:38.800]  anything about the rules. You've got to walk them through each step. You talk about judge
[13:38.800 --> 13:44.320]  Smith in such and such county, on such and such a court. You'd be very specific which
[13:44.320 --> 13:51.440]  court. You talk about which case number. You indicate the basic demeanor of the judge in
[13:51.440 --> 13:57.920]  the introduction about what the general failure is. A rampant failure to follow and equally
[13:57.920 --> 14:06.320]  apply the rules of civil procedure and or criminal procedure. The hostility in the courtroom
[14:06.320 --> 14:11.120]  towards you have been an example of that. I had one gentleman that was involved in a
[14:11.120 --> 14:15.520]  case in which he was speaking court and he wanted to object to something and right at
[14:15.520 --> 14:21.200]  the time he was about to open his mouth, the judge gave him the hand gesture of a stop sign.
[14:21.200 --> 14:26.480]  Everybody knows what that hand gesture means. You don't have to be deft to know what hand
[14:26.480 --> 14:32.400]  gestures are. However, the judge did that mainly because the court reporter doesn't record
[14:32.400 --> 14:39.280]  those hand gestures. Now, this guy had been versed that, excuse me, I don't know what
[14:39.280 --> 14:44.800]  that gesture means. Are you meaning that towards me? What do you want me to do? I don't believe
[14:44.800 --> 14:50.080]  the court reporter can stow that. Usually that gets a little laughter from everybody but
[14:50.080 --> 14:54.720]  it puts the judge on notice that you know that the judge is trying to get away with
[14:54.720 --> 15:00.640]  stopping you from putting something on the record. If the judge continues to interrupt
[15:00.640 --> 15:06.240]  your objections, you need at some point in time bring into the process while you're doing
[15:06.240 --> 15:12.800]  the case. Excuse me, I don't understand why you're angry with me. I'm attempting to object
[15:12.800 --> 15:19.280]  in order to preserve the record for appeal and to argue the law with regard to the application
[15:19.280 --> 15:24.480]  of this particular objection, whether or not it's sustained or otherwise. But I don't want
[15:24.480 --> 15:29.680]  to be stopped by you holding up a hand gesture. If that kind of thing gets put on the record,
[15:29.680 --> 15:35.440]  you have to then walk through each rule that applies to that particular objection. It gets
[15:35.440 --> 15:41.920]  technical, but that's what the law is. I wish it was simpler, but this is the only game in town
[15:41.920 --> 15:47.280]  that we have for justice in this country. So the issue is, is know the rules, follow the rules,
[15:47.280 --> 15:52.960]  practice the rules, but make sure that you get things on the record. I've had judges that start
[15:52.960 --> 16:00.400]  to get down to copying an attitude with me. And as soon as they do that, you honor with all due
[16:00.400 --> 16:06.400]  respect, why are you angry at me? So as soon as you put that in, that gets put on the transcript.
[16:06.960 --> 16:12.480]  If anybody's read a transcript, anger, voice tones, and the whole attitude of what the judge
[16:12.480 --> 16:19.440]  didn't do doesn't come across in the dialogue. The court reporter doesn't put in an angry tone
[16:19.440 --> 16:25.440]  the judge said this. The judge yelled at this. There's no comments like that. It's just judge,
[16:25.440 --> 16:31.280]  and it's sit down and shut up, but there's no tone quality to it.
[16:34.160 --> 16:39.200]  Okay, yeah, and that works both ways. Okay, this is Randy Kelton,
[16:39.200 --> 16:48.640]  Kevin Stevens at the Craig River Radio. We're going to break. Our calling number is 512-646-1984.
[16:48.640 --> 16:53.280]  Give us a call if you have a question for Ken or if you just have a general question.
[16:53.280 --> 16:55.040]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[17:02.400 --> 17:11.680]  It's the story of a lost city, lost opportunity, lost hope. A story of failed policies, failed
[17:11.680 --> 17:19.840]  leadership, a story of smooth talking politicians, games of he said, she said, rhetoric, and division.
[17:20.800 --> 17:29.840]  One mess has stood apart, stood strong, and true. Voting against every tax increase,
[17:29.840 --> 17:37.680]  every unhoused budget, every time. Standing up to the Washington machine, guided by principal
[17:37.680 --> 17:45.200]  Ron Paul, the one who will stop the spending, save the dollar, create jobs,
[17:45.200 --> 17:54.800]  break peace, the one who will restore liberty. Ron Paul, the one who can beat Obama and restore
[17:54.800 --> 18:02.400]  America now. I'm Ron Paul, and I approve this message. Are you being harassed by debt collectors
[18:02.400 --> 18:07.600]  with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael
[18:07.600 --> 18:12.880]  Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors,
[18:12.880 --> 18:18.160]  and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win
[18:18.160 --> 18:23.440]  in court using federal civil rights statutes. What to do when contacted by phones, mail,
[18:23.440 --> 18:28.000]  or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of
[18:28.000 --> 18:33.760]  your credit report? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:33.760 --> 18:39.120]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal
[18:39.120 --> 18:44.480]  consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[18:44.480 --> 18:49.840]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com. That's
[18:49.840 --> 18:59.440]  ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com. To learn how to stop debt collectors
[18:59.440 --> 19:07.520]  next. Well, don't let nothing get to you. Only the Father can do this by you. So don't let
[19:07.520 --> 19:23.760]  nothing get to you. I tell states I'm getting behind you. You know what I mean? My friend,
[19:23.760 --> 19:38.640]  we're back. Special guest, Jim Agasson, talking about judicial conduct. He was speaking earlier
[19:38.640 --> 19:46.000]  about the complaint about how to write the complaint. And it used to be written in the
[19:46.000 --> 19:54.320]  verbiage of the canon that you're accusing the judge of violating. And I know most people
[19:54.320 --> 20:02.400]  tend to hate reading law books and these canons can get kind of dry. And that's why I'm trying
[20:02.400 --> 20:10.880]  to get these things converted into a set of questions. It's a lot easier to read the
[20:10.880 --> 20:18.240]  statute or the canons in terms of did the judge do this or did the judge do that. It invokes
[20:19.520 --> 20:25.440]  the curiosity and the interest in the way that a flat statement doesn't. So if there's anybody out
[20:25.440 --> 20:31.440]  there who has time and can really interpret the English language, I sure could use a volunteer
[20:31.440 --> 20:40.960]  to go down through the canons and convert each requirement into a question. And once I have
[20:40.960 --> 20:47.200]  that done, I can add in the input fields and get this thing up and online relatively quickly.
[20:48.080 --> 20:55.840]  I just have so many projects that I'm working on. That's one I haven't gotten to yet. So if anybody's
[20:55.840 --> 21:02.240]  interested in giving a hand, send me an email at Randy at Rule of Law Radio and I sure would
[21:02.240 --> 21:09.760]  appreciate the help. Okay, Ken, we were on the break. We were talking about where to send these
[21:09.760 --> 21:17.600]  complaints. If you have any complaints, if you filed any, email them to me at Randy at Rule
[21:17.600 --> 21:28.400]  of Law Radio dot com. And I will make sure they get to Ken. Go ahead. There's an important aspect
[21:28.400 --> 21:33.600]  of this. What we need to see is not only the complaint you sent, but all of the responses
[21:33.600 --> 21:39.840]  that were sent by the Judicial Conduct Commission. Every single response that they send is a
[21:39.840 --> 21:46.800]  telling tale of their failure. So we need their responses. Yeah, and I suspect we're all going
[21:46.800 --> 21:54.880]  to be the same standard computer-generated response. And we can use that to beat them up
[21:54.880 --> 22:01.120]  really good with before the legislature. We have, you know, we have just a few months before
[22:01.120 --> 22:06.240]  these committee meets, but we have a year before the next legislature steps in place.
[22:07.360 --> 22:14.160]  So I should have time to get up to Judicial Conduct, get it working and see if we can't start getting
[22:14.160 --> 22:21.840]  in a lot of complaints. We get in as many as we can, and then we'll have something to bring
[22:21.840 --> 22:31.920]  to the legislature. And also, the fact that this site is out there will also be helpful because
[22:32.960 --> 22:39.760]  the judge is all running for election. And no attorney says anything bad about judges because
[22:39.760 --> 22:45.680]  the judges are screwed. They're screwed to a client to make fun of them in front of them. So if we
[22:45.680 --> 22:54.800]  have a third-party site that the courts have no authority over, and it's my site, they can tell
[22:54.800 --> 23:01.440]  me they don't like it if they want to, and I would not be impressed. So they don't really have any
[23:01.440 --> 23:10.080]  purchase with me, and they'll know that. So these things is likely they'll realize they're
[23:10.080 --> 23:13.200]  going to start coming back to haunt them, and they may actually get these judges
[23:13.920 --> 23:23.600]  doing some of the stuff that's supposed to be doing. We have a caller, and he's calling about an
[23:23.600 --> 23:33.040]  issue in Williamson County. I think we'll go to Bill right now and see what he's got for us. There
[23:33.040 --> 23:42.080]  we go. Bill. Yes, I'm here. You're in Williamson County. I am. You must be having loads of fun.
[23:42.080 --> 23:50.400]  Well, I wouldn't call it fun. It's certainly been enlightening. Where you want me to start,
[23:50.400 --> 23:54.400]  you want me to just tell you what I'm looking for? Because you, first of all,
[23:54.400 --> 23:58.960]  you're a judicial conduct complaint. I've got four of those for you to put in your pile.
[23:59.760 --> 24:06.640]  No one judicial. Okay. I've been having trouble with Williamson County for a number of years.
[24:06.640 --> 24:15.280]  Most recently was March 5th, Saturday, March 5th. I had a female officer come to my porch
[24:15.280 --> 24:20.560]  telling me she had a warrant for arrest for somebody who was staying at my house.
[24:21.440 --> 24:26.000]  Of course, after listening to all of her a number of months, if not years,
[24:26.880 --> 24:34.320]  I questioned their authority long story short. I was assaulted and kidnapped,
[24:35.360 --> 24:44.000]  evidence suppressed. I've got so much information from top to bottom that I'm looking for the
[24:44.000 --> 24:50.000]  that rights advocacy group that was on a couple of weeks back that's handling that Ken Anderson
[24:50.000 --> 24:58.640]  Wilco thing. Yes. I think they would be highly interested in everything that I've got now,
[24:58.640 --> 25:07.440]  because I've got the prosecutor for withholding the first car audio disc for seven months.
[25:07.440 --> 25:15.360]  There's a six month statute of limitations pursuing the city, apparently. No, there isn't.
[25:17.360 --> 25:26.800]  No, it's not from when something starts, when it ends. Okay. If they're still pursuing you,
[25:26.800 --> 25:33.680]  the clock hasn't started running yet. They are. They're still pursuing. They've also waited nine
[25:33.680 --> 25:42.080]  months to produce a second video audio that is pretty well all telling and damning. I have the
[25:42.080 --> 25:48.880]  officers conspiring on my private property via the cell phone with other unknown officers,
[25:49.440 --> 26:00.160]  although I'm pretty sure I know who they are. I also have, I also am lacking the 911 call where I
[26:00.160 --> 26:08.400]  called to get County to come over here and protect me from them. I have the deputy sheriff
[26:10.480 --> 26:17.600]  on record stating they want me to do what, and then I've also got him on record stating
[26:19.440 --> 26:26.160]  this is not a blanking game. I won't play with you. You will take it up to the judge,
[26:26.160 --> 26:36.240]  put your hands behind your back, or I will hurt you. Do you understand? Okay. What did they arrest
[26:36.240 --> 26:42.960]  you for? Well, okay. The warrant was for the guy who's staying at my house. He's now married to my
[26:42.960 --> 26:51.040]  daughter for speeding, class C misdemeanor, punishable by fine only. She showed up and said she
[26:51.040 --> 26:55.920]  had a warrant. I said, where's the warrant? She handed me a piece of paper with names and
[26:55.920 --> 27:00.080]  addresses on it. No warrant. I said, you got to have a warrant. Where's the warrant? She said,
[27:00.080 --> 27:07.360]  I'll get the warrant. The warrant eventually showed. There's no author affirmation. There's no
[27:07.360 --> 27:15.040]  notary public signature or stamp. It says corporation court and the judge's signature
[27:15.040 --> 27:22.320]  is a rubber stamp with an initial. So naturally I questioned them and they assaulted me and charged
[27:22.320 --> 27:28.240]  me with hindering apprehension. They initially called it charge me with hindering apprehension
[27:28.960 --> 27:40.160]  and something about process. Denial of process or I can't remember it now. I have it in front of me.
[27:41.520 --> 27:48.640]  Regardless, I'm still working on it. The prosecutor tried to fair monger me,
[27:48.640 --> 27:55.920]  plea bargain me down to, it was hindering apprehension. Hindering apprehension and
[27:55.920 --> 28:01.760]  resisting arrest were the two first initial charges. Hindering apprehension. Yes.
[28:03.360 --> 28:12.800]  What the heck is that? Exactly. Now there's a 3805, 3805 Pima code, which is shielding from
[28:12.800 --> 28:23.840]  prosecution. But any, do you know a hindering apprehension? No. I might have that worded wrong.
[28:23.840 --> 28:30.240]  Hindering apprehension or prosecution is 3805. No, that's shielding from prosecution.
[28:31.040 --> 28:37.440]  I think so. That's hindering apprehension or prosecution. That's the title. That's it.
[28:37.440 --> 28:45.200]  Okay. So they charge you with a felony? They charged me with two class A misdemeanors.
[28:46.640 --> 28:53.360]  The, you know, the fake judge over there in the jail called me in there and told me my bond was
[28:53.360 --> 29:00.480]  $2,500 for each offense. And then a little while later, I was called back in there again
[29:00.480 --> 29:10.640]  and he reduced it to $75 in offense. But irregardless I had, I now have documented proof
[29:11.520 --> 29:18.160]  of the officers all conspiring. One officer telling the other officer on the phone that said,
[29:18.160 --> 29:25.920]  all right, well, you're on point on that then, meaning the assault. I've got them lying to
[29:25.920 --> 29:31.920]  their supervisor who later accidentally picked up the officer that was on point for the assault.
[29:32.960 --> 29:40.640]  I hear the music. Okay. Hang on. We'll pick this up on the other side. This is Randy Kelly from
[29:40.640 --> 29:49.520]  Denver Stevens, Eddie Craig. We have a radio. Our call in number is 512-646-1984. Give us a call.
[29:49.520 --> 29:55.280]  Ask us a hard question. We'll get a kid to answer it. We'll be right back.
[29:59.920 --> 30:05.840]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The government
[30:05.840 --> 30:11.280]  says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a
[30:11.280 --> 30:15.840]  controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives and thousands
[30:15.840 --> 30:20.240]  of my fellow force responders have died. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer.
[30:20.240 --> 30:24.320]  I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:24.320 --> 30:29.760]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:34.080 --> 30:38.480]  Marketers are getting really creative and sometimes deceitful with the labels they're
[30:38.480 --> 30:43.040]  putting on food packages. I've got your camper in Albright and I'll tell you about a campaign
[30:43.040 --> 30:50.160]  to take the empty claims off of food labels next. Privacy is under attack. When you give
[30:50.160 --> 30:54.960]  up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone,
[30:54.960 --> 31:00.880]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance
[31:00.880 --> 31:06.640]  and keep your information to yourself. Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. This public service
[31:06.640 --> 31:12.000]  announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[31:12.000 --> 31:18.720]  Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage. Food labels are supposed to tell us what's in the
[31:18.720 --> 31:24.160]  food we eat. So what does it mean to say made with natural goodness or doctor recommended?
[31:24.160 --> 31:28.720]  Tell me, what is doctor recommended food anyway? The Center for Science and the Public
[31:28.720 --> 31:33.760]  Interest is calling for an end to misleading labels. They say these claims make food sound
[31:33.760 --> 31:39.680]  healthier than it really is. One example, lightly sweetened cereal. Just how much sugar is in that
[31:39.680 --> 31:45.280]  exactly. Another reads all natural until you check the ingredients to see it's chock full of modified
[31:45.280 --> 31:50.880]  corn starch and other chemicals. Finally, here's my favorite, kid approved. Since when did parents
[31:50.880 --> 31:55.760]  need kids approval to fill the cupboard? I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information
[31:55.760 --> 31:57.440]  at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:57.440 --> 32:25.600]  Okay, we're back, ready to jump to the stage. We've got Craig with the video. We're talking to a
[32:25.600 --> 32:36.320]  building in Texas. And I guess I should back up and go back to the start. When you were arrested,
[32:38.560 --> 32:44.960]  before you were arrested, did you offer any physical resistance to them?
[32:46.960 --> 32:51.840]  I did not whatsoever. It was everything was verbally questioning their authority.
[32:51.840 --> 32:56.800]  Good. When they arrested you, what time of day was it?
[32:57.760 --> 33:05.920]  It was approximately 9 30 ish Saturday morning. For the one roundup, of course.
[33:07.920 --> 33:15.520]  Oh, that's what it was a one roundup. Okay, did they take you? Oh, this is a one roundup. Oh,
[33:15.520 --> 33:17.600]  wonderful. And it wasn't for me.
[33:17.600 --> 33:25.120]  Yeah, did they take you to a magistrate directly? No, negative, negative.
[33:25.680 --> 33:29.120]  How long did they hold you before they brought you before a magistrate?
[33:31.040 --> 33:40.640]  It was approximately, approximately 130 to a clock. So 9 30 till 130.
[33:40.640 --> 33:45.840]  When you were first brought before the magistrate,
[33:47.520 --> 33:53.040]  did the magistrate have a folder with information about you in it? He did.
[33:55.360 --> 34:01.680]  Did the magistrate ask you any questions concerning the details of the incident that
[34:01.680 --> 34:13.200]  led to the arrest? No, he did not. So you already said that the magistrates notified you of bail.
[34:14.800 --> 34:19.360]  Now, here's my position. Actually, actually, I hang on a moment to stop you right there,
[34:19.360 --> 34:25.600]  because when the magistrate informed me of the charges against me, I asked him
[34:25.600 --> 34:33.680]  where the officer was. And if this was my examining trial, I informed him that I had been
[34:33.680 --> 34:38.720]  assaulted and kidnapped. And he sat back and eyes wide and looked at me. And he said,
[34:39.280 --> 34:42.640]  by whom? And I said, well, I don't know, because he's not standing here.
[34:46.320 --> 34:51.360]  So what did the magistrate do? Well, that's when he proceeded with the
[34:51.360 --> 34:59.360]  arraignment part of it and told me, you know, it was $2,500 a piece for the initial charges.
[35:00.000 --> 35:12.240]  Okay, here's the deal. 17.05 code of criminal procedure. It says bail is taken by a magistrate
[35:12.240 --> 35:18.800]  after an examining trial. Yes, sir. By a judge in Havies Corpus, by a police officer in the 17
[35:18.800 --> 35:28.720]  2023-122. Therefore, if bail was taken by the magistrates, there had to have been an examining
[35:28.720 --> 35:37.280]  trial. Exactly. And since this wasn't it, when did they hold that examining trial wherein bail
[35:37.280 --> 35:42.400]  was set? They did not. They held no examining trial. They're trying to... Wait a minute. How you
[35:42.400 --> 35:50.400]  knew that? All you know is actually they had to hold an examining trial. Otherwise, bail couldn't
[35:50.400 --> 35:59.440]  be set. So since you were in custody, they had to have held that examining trial while secreting
[35:59.440 --> 36:06.400]  you from the court. Exactly. Yes, sir. So normally, when a police officer comes to a judge
[36:06.400 --> 36:13.200]  to ask the judge to issue a warrant, it's an exporter hearing because he wouldn't be asking
[36:13.200 --> 36:21.360]  if he wanted, if he had to go to jail. So they're kind of accustomed to holding those kinds of
[36:21.360 --> 36:29.360]  hearings. But if someone is in jail and he's been arrested without a warrant, a warrant has to be
[36:29.360 --> 36:37.280]  created. 16.20 code of criminal procedure requires the magistrate after a determination of probable
[36:37.280 --> 36:47.200]  cause to issue a warrant. He's also required to issue a order under 1617, which they generally do.
[36:47.200 --> 37:03.680]  Now, Eddie will talk about 1517, about a different procedure. But this thing of issuing the order,
[37:03.680 --> 37:12.880]  that's required under chapter 16, the chapter that defines an examining trial. Article 2.10 says
[37:12.880 --> 37:20.960]  when there was a 2.11, when a magistrate sits for the purpose of examining into a criminal
[37:20.960 --> 37:27.840]  accusation, that is an examining trial. And then chapter 16 defines what they're doing as
[37:27.840 --> 37:35.600]  examining trials. So since the only place bail can be set is at an examining trial, then they
[37:35.600 --> 37:47.360]  have to have had one. And they secreted you from it. Have you read my habeas corpus?
[37:48.080 --> 37:55.440]  I do. I have it and I am actually in the process of plagiarizing it because that's going to be one
[37:55.440 --> 38:03.920]  of my wild questions. What? Do you plagiarize me? It's going to be a wild card if I have to go
[38:03.920 --> 38:09.840]  in there and pick out a jury. The prosecutor's in deep, deep, deep, deep. He's going to have to go
[38:09.840 --> 38:16.000]  by himself a good pair of waden boots, maybe hip some hip waders, and a really good paddle,
[38:16.000 --> 38:24.400]  because I'm going to throw him in the boat with Ken Anderson. Good. Well, good. It sounds like
[38:24.400 --> 38:33.360]  you pretty well have all the pieces in place. If you follow that habeas, it demonstrates about,
[38:34.080 --> 38:42.480]  I think, 19 or 21 due process violations. Yes, sir. Number of class A misdemeanors and felonies.
[38:43.840 --> 38:49.600]  Have you filed any criminal complaints against them yet? I have not yet, because I'm also following
[38:49.600 --> 38:55.680]  some of your other advice, which is politics, politics, politics. You want to hear my other wild
[38:55.680 --> 39:02.960]  card? Yes. The judge that presided over the gay case up until approximately two months ago,
[39:03.920 --> 39:09.920]  poor guy, I really feel for him. I hope he's okay. He fell out of his deer stand and broke his pelvis.
[39:10.800 --> 39:17.040]  He's out for six months. I have a judge who I believe is appointed from Tarrant County,
[39:17.040 --> 39:25.600]  who has no political, emotional, or whatever tie you want to connect with Williamson County,
[39:26.400 --> 39:34.320]  sitting on the bench. Wonderful. Yeah, I know this guy who says everything's political.
[39:35.440 --> 39:43.920]  Right. Yeah, I'm starting to believe that. He's got these four rules. I call them Ken's rules.
[39:43.920 --> 39:48.000]  Ken, you want to go see those rules?
[39:49.840 --> 39:56.160]  Well, the first rule is perception is everything. How you're perceived and how you perceive the
[39:56.160 --> 40:02.800]  world is what counts. Sometimes the truth enters into it. Frequently, the truth does not enter into
[40:02.800 --> 40:10.320]  it. We all have received accolades or condemnation for things we didn't do, and that's how that
[40:10.320 --> 40:18.800]  happens. Number two, everything's negotiable. Every child out there recognizes this very early on.
[40:18.800 --> 40:26.640]  Mom, I'll leave an extra helping of broccoli if you let me have two cookies now. Everything is
[40:26.640 --> 40:37.840]  negotiable. Number three, if it's not documented, it didn't happen. I'm not saying everything has
[40:37.840 --> 40:43.280]  to be documented. There just has to be a paper trail that shows that conversations occurred,
[40:43.280 --> 40:48.720]  that agreements were made, that things were done in order to memorialize the process.
[40:49.920 --> 40:54.080]  Number four, everything's political, and I don't mean Democrat, Republican,
[40:54.080 --> 41:01.520]  Wig, Tory. I'm talking about the politics of small groups. Judge, not a judge. Police officer,
[41:01.520 --> 41:08.240]  not a police officer. Teacher, not a teacher, and you get the idea. Obviously, we could go on with
[41:08.240 --> 41:13.280]  this for quite some time, but almost everybody, once they hear the rules, they go, oh yeah,
[41:13.280 --> 41:20.080]  okay, I see this. Almost everybody intuitively knows them, but doesn't practice or pay attention to
[41:20.080 --> 41:33.920]  them. Yes, that's exactly what I wanted. I mentioned those rules quite often, and I haven't quite taken
[41:34.560 --> 41:41.600]  credit for them yet, but I'm working on it. Actually, this is the can of kin's four rules.
[41:42.320 --> 41:46.560]  Right. So I could plagiarize them. I just can't take credit for them.
[41:46.560 --> 41:52.960]  Okay. So you're not, why have you not filed
[41:55.200 --> 42:00.320]  complaints with the locals? Well, you live in St. County. I can understand part of that.
[42:03.120 --> 42:07.600]  What about judicial conduct complaints? I haven't filed anything yet, because I've been dealing with
[42:07.600 --> 42:17.440]  Wilco for the last three or four years for some other issues involving my daughter, and obviously,
[42:17.440 --> 42:25.600]  I wasn't able to pull it off at that time. So at this point, I didn't, I haven't filed anything yet,
[42:25.600 --> 42:30.640]  because I didn't have any evidence. I didn't have any proof. Leander was not coughing it up.
[42:31.600 --> 42:35.440]  When this first happened, when this very first happened, I called the mayor
[42:35.440 --> 42:40.880]  and asked him if the police department bothered to call him and tell him that they had assaulted me
[42:40.880 --> 42:45.280]  and kidnapped me, and he told me, you know, well, I've never heard anything like that before. I'll
[42:45.280 --> 42:53.760]  have to look into it. He went directly to the city manager who, interesting tidbit of information,
[42:54.320 --> 42:57.280]  died of a massive coronary about a week and a half later.
[42:57.280 --> 43:04.960]  That was your fault. It might be. It might be. And then it went directly to the police,
[43:04.960 --> 43:12.000]  the chief of police. And I had a report from the ninth of that month, which is, you know,
[43:12.000 --> 43:22.320]  four days, three days after the incident occurred stating that there was no evidence found from
[43:22.320 --> 43:32.720]  my, you know, accusation. But yet now, nine months later, I have the chain of custody off of the disc
[43:33.600 --> 43:40.000]  that shows, I hear the music. I'll tell you, I'll tell you about it on the next slide. Okay,
[43:40.000 --> 43:46.960]  this is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig, we'll do a video. Our call then number is 512
[43:46.960 --> 43:57.520]  646-1984. We'll be right back on the other side. Do something. Okay.
[44:00.560 --> 44:05.680]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with
[44:05.680 --> 44:12.560]  Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how, in 24
[44:12.560 --> 44:19.200]  hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't
[44:19.200 --> 44:24.800]  have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step
[44:24.800 --> 44:31.680]  course. And now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years
[44:31.680 --> 44:37.680]  of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[44:37.680 --> 44:43.440]  understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive
[44:43.440 --> 44:51.120]  our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much
[44:51.120 --> 44:59.680]  more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner. Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[45:01.280 --> 45:05.280]  The Oklahoma City bombing. Top 10 reasons to question the official story.
[45:05.280 --> 45:10.400]  Reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices. On the day of the bombing,
[45:10.400 --> 45:15.360]  nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the Ryder truck report that he was accompanied
[45:15.360 --> 45:21.120]  by other perpetrators. The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone
[45:21.120 --> 45:25.680]  delivered the Ryder truck bomb to the Murrah building and detonated it. The only witness
[45:25.680 --> 45:30.560]  the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley, who lost her
[45:30.560 --> 45:35.360]  children and one of her legs in the bombing, testified that she saw McVeigh with another man,
[45:35.360 --> 45:40.720]  the faithful John Doe number two, exiting the Ryder truck. While at least 15 other witnesses
[45:40.720 --> 45:46.160]  claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing, no less than 226
[45:46.160 --> 45:51.440]  witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing, including when he
[45:51.440 --> 45:56.800]  rented the Ryder truck, and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:56.800 --> 46:01.040]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:27.200 --> 46:35.120]  What I'm wishing for, when I'm hungry, I like to know just what I'm fishing for.
[46:35.120 --> 46:44.160]  I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton. I'm just here making my living pushing
[46:44.160 --> 46:55.040]  button. I give my message out to anyone in the shot and distance. I hope for bravery and against
[46:55.040 --> 47:00.480]  slavery showing resistance. First I'm crawling, then I'm walking.
[47:00.480 --> 47:04.640]  Okay, we're back. I'm going to tell Jeff Stevens Eddie Craig through the radio,
[47:04.640 --> 47:10.640]  talking to Bill in Texas. We're going to start calling him William for Williamson
[47:10.640 --> 47:21.600]  County instead of Bill. Okay, you had just killed the prosecutor of the city manager,
[47:21.600 --> 47:29.440]  annoyed the chief of police, and found that the chief of police had lied to you? Is that
[47:29.440 --> 47:39.360]  where you were going when we went out? Oh, hold on Bill, somebody muted you. I don't know how that
[47:39.360 --> 47:45.520]  happened. All right, yes, I do. I have a letter from the chief of police. I also have a letter
[47:45.520 --> 47:56.640]  allegedly from the attorney general's office stating that they couldn't release the information I was
[47:56.640 --> 48:03.520]  requesting because I went... So the next day, following Monday after I was arrested, I went over
[48:03.520 --> 48:07.840]  and filed a freedom of information act for the information. Of course, I was told it's an ongoing
[48:07.840 --> 48:15.120]  investigation, can't have it. So I've got this letter allegedly from the attorney general's office
[48:15.120 --> 48:21.920]  stating that that's the case, that I'm not sure if it... Okay, wait, okay, here's what they're saying,
[48:22.880 --> 48:32.400]  is that since there is a case going on, the Open Records Act no longer applies. Okay. If you look
[48:32.400 --> 48:41.120]  online, I have a blank information request, and they asked for records under the Open Records Act,
[48:41.120 --> 48:52.960]  under 1.29 code of criminal procedure, or any other applicable law. What they do is if you ask for it
[48:52.960 --> 49:01.280]  under Open Records, they say, oh, well, these records are covered by Open Records. Once you're
[49:01.280 --> 49:08.080]  involved in a case, it was not intended that the Open Records Law supplant discovery.
[49:08.080 --> 49:17.840]  So when I make the request, I make it under... And a lot of times the court will say our records
[49:17.840 --> 49:25.200]  don't fall under the Open Records Act. So no problem, I want them under Article 1.29 code of
[49:25.200 --> 49:34.480]  criminal procedure that says all courts shall be public. That's the statute that makes the court
[49:34.480 --> 49:43.200]  records public. And the Attorney General is lying to you by omission. He's telling you that the
[49:43.200 --> 49:53.440]  records... He's giving the impression that the records are not available. But he's not telling
[49:53.440 --> 50:00.960]  you that the records are only not available under the Open Records Act. And technically,
[50:00.960 --> 50:07.040]  they should be there anyway because you have a special interest. But there are... His case
[50:07.040 --> 50:13.840]  law that says that the Open Records Law doesn't supplant discovery, so you can go under 1.29.
[50:13.840 --> 50:20.000]  So you ask for it under Article 1.29 code of criminal procedure, and don't mention the Open
[50:20.000 --> 50:32.880]  Records Act. But on the other hand, one more caveat. Doesn't matter which one you state.
[50:34.720 --> 50:38.000]  If you're holding... If you're a public official and you're holding records,
[50:39.120 --> 50:46.560]  and you have a statutory duty to make those available on request, it doesn't make any
[50:46.560 --> 50:53.440]  difference if I mention the statute or not. It doesn't make any difference if I mention the
[50:53.440 --> 51:04.320]  wrong statute. It does not affect your duty. Well put, well put. That being said, nine months
[51:04.320 --> 51:13.520]  later now on the second death they produced, there's a chain of custody for these audio videos
[51:13.520 --> 51:21.600]  that show that the only time that anybody even looked into these videos or requested them for
[51:21.600 --> 51:33.680]  viewing was at seven months, respectively, and now nine months. So the chief of police stated
[51:33.680 --> 51:40.400]  that he inquired into it, but there's no proof that he ever looked at any of the actual evidence
[51:40.400 --> 51:49.840]  because the evidence is there. Therefore I attest that the prosecutor has secreted that
[51:49.840 --> 52:00.720]  government document from me. Have you grieved the prosecutor? Not yet, and the only reason
[52:00.720 --> 52:06.400]  that I'm holding off doing it is because I'm playing the politics. You're playing the wrong
[52:06.400 --> 52:16.960]  politics. Wrong politics? Yeah, here's the thing. You grieve him, and it's like ever when he's going
[52:16.960 --> 52:24.640]  to high school, you're getting the fight in there, high school, schoolyard with another kid there.
[52:24.640 --> 52:35.200]  Yeah. After the fight, we always become buddies. Yeah. And after the fight,
[52:36.640 --> 52:41.920]  they don't ever want to do that again. If you ever get costed by the local bully and you knock
[52:41.920 --> 52:51.040]  crap out of him, he is not going to want to go there again. Okay. When you sting that prosecutor
[52:51.040 --> 52:56.960]  good, he's not going to want it to happen again. And I used to consider that filing a grievance
[52:56.960 --> 53:04.480]  against the prosecutor really didn't hurt him. But that's not true. Okay. The only time it won't
[53:04.480 --> 53:12.160]  really hurt the prosecutor is if he is a career prosecutor. And since they're elected, none of
[53:12.160 --> 53:19.440]  them are. You grieve them. When they get out of the prosecutor's office and have to buy their own
[53:19.440 --> 53:29.360]  malpractice insurance, that's going to sting them good. Ken, would you talk about the attorney you
[53:29.360 --> 53:40.720]  grieved years ago? You're talking about Mr. Lipscomb? Yes. I was more than just grieving him. It was
[53:40.720 --> 53:49.120]  the fact that I filed a suit and the suit just created such a problem for him to get malpractice
[53:49.120 --> 53:55.360]  insurance that he went ahead and was out of the business he had to go and hire in as a staff
[53:55.360 --> 54:07.440]  attorney with another law firm. And I know you felt real bad about that. Yes. So, yeah. So,
[54:07.440 --> 54:13.920]  this guy gets out of the prosecutor's office. A lot of these guys, they get out of law school and
[54:13.920 --> 54:20.880]  it takes them a couple of times to pass the bar. You know, a lot of them were mascots for the
[54:22.000 --> 54:28.000]  local brewery. So, you know, they weren't exactly sharpest knives in the drawer and no law firm
[54:28.000 --> 54:35.120]  picks them up. So, how do they get started? And if we don't have enough sets to know what to do and
[54:35.120 --> 54:39.200]  all they have to do is become a prosecutor, you know, we have to just make a deal. You know,
[54:39.200 --> 54:48.400]  do anything else. But at some point they're going to be out of that job like if their boss gets
[54:48.400 --> 54:56.320]  voted out, odds are he's going to fire everybody. Then these lawyers to be out there in the real
[54:56.320 --> 55:01.680]  world and have to go get malpractice insurance. Well, when they go to the insurance company and
[55:01.680 --> 55:06.000]  they look at this guy's going to prosecute and he's got a half a dozen grievances against him.
[55:06.000 --> 55:14.640]  Grab hold tight, Bubba. Just like if you're trying to get insurance full coverage on your car and
[55:14.640 --> 55:23.120]  you've had three, four accidents. All right. I understand that. Okay. And the other issue,
[55:24.320 --> 55:33.600]  you know, the knee jerk reaction is to consider if I do this, he's going to beat me up.
[55:33.600 --> 55:43.200]  No, he's not. You kick him in his teeth. You steaming good where he lives. He is not going
[55:43.200 --> 55:50.000]  to want you to do that again. Okay. That's how it really works. You see, the nice thing about the
[55:50.000 --> 55:58.080]  grievance is he'll never say anything about it. And you won't say anything about it. So,
[55:58.080 --> 56:06.960]  he doesn't have to deal with it directly. He can say, well, you know, I reexamine the evidence
[56:07.680 --> 56:13.840]  and I decided that we really don't have enough to prosecute. And he doesn't have to lose face.
[56:16.720 --> 56:21.600]  Well, I suggest it when you file a grievance, never say a word about it.
[56:23.360 --> 56:27.520]  They won't. If they do, then you file a grievance for that. So they're not going to say a thing
[56:27.520 --> 56:31.120]  about it. They're going to ask why it never happened. And I just need to act like it never
[56:31.120 --> 56:37.120]  happened too, except for the case. Absolutely. Because they're going to act like it's no big deal
[56:37.120 --> 56:44.080]  and so are you. Okay. That's no big deal to me. You know, one of the things that confirmed this
[56:44.080 --> 56:52.720]  for me was three of mine got a job at the county assessor's office. And he was going to the
[56:52.720 --> 56:56.240]  orientation. They got him to the front desk and they said, there's just one thing. There's just
[56:56.240 --> 57:02.240]  one guy who comes in here. Randy Kelton. Yeah. Randy, a special guest would like to say something.
[57:03.440 --> 57:09.440]  Thank you. You can. You can act like it didn't happen, but we still want a copy of the complaint.
[57:10.960 --> 57:18.480]  Right. Right. Yeah. Give us a copy, whether you filed it or not. I was actually pondering
[57:18.480 --> 57:28.560]  coming down to Brave New Books and bringing everything that I've got to visit with. Very
[57:28.560 --> 57:36.480]  critic. No, you're not, not any correct. Very critics a lot prettier than. Yeah, that's what
[57:36.480 --> 57:46.560]  I was thinking about doing. So I can get those to you in that manner. Think about this is politics.
[57:46.560 --> 57:54.720]  Can I ask you a question? Yes. The, the Bargreevon says I should file between one and
[57:54.720 --> 57:59.200]  what number for each date that they've had me in the courthouse.
[58:00.720 --> 58:08.000]  The Travis Owinnit. Each day they've had you in the courthouse. I'm not sure exactly what
[58:08.000 --> 58:17.600]  you're talking about, building them for your time. Not at the moment, but that thought has
[58:17.600 --> 58:24.160]  crossed my mind. We'll address that on the other side. I know some, some guys who've made up letters
[58:24.160 --> 58:30.000]  to that effect telling the other side that they have their times expensive and they bill for it.
[58:31.680 --> 58:34.880]  Yeah. That's an interesting concept. I haven't researched it out.
[58:34.880 --> 58:41.040]  But it's sure worth looking into. This is Randy Kelton,
[58:41.040 --> 58:45.040]  member Steven Z. Craig. We're going to the top of our break.
[58:45.760 --> 58:49.840]  We'll come back on the other side. We'll go back to building Texas. Give us a call.
[58:49.840 --> 58:54.960]  512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[58:54.960 --> 59:05.600]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[59:05.600 --> 59:11.600]  because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:11.600 --> 59:15.760]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:16.720 --> 59:23.200]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:23.200 --> 59:29.280]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound
[59:29.280 --> 59:35.200]  passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond
[59:35.200 --> 59:40.960]  which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery
[59:40.960 --> 59:47.440]  version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling
[59:47.440 --> 59:59.760]  us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:17.440 --> 01:00:36.560]  The Iraqi Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki's security services have imprisoned more than
[01:00:36.560 --> 01:00:42.560]  1,000 members of other political parties over the past several months, detaining many of them in
[01:00:42.560 --> 01:00:49.520]  secret locations with no access to legal counsel and using brutal torture to extract confessions.
[01:00:49.520 --> 01:00:54.960]  Whose block is part of Maliki's coalition government demanded Wednesday Maliki grant
[01:00:54.960 --> 01:01:01.920]  detainees legal counsel and due process. Indigenous peoples of southeast Mexico are
[01:01:01.920 --> 01:01:07.040]  demanding to be included in the Maya World Promotion Plan launched by the government Monday
[01:01:07.040 --> 01:01:12.880]  to take advantage of the world's interest in the 2012 Mayan prophecy while fearing Doomsday
[01:01:12.880 --> 01:01:18.880]  tourism could damage and contaminate their sacred sites. The Mexican government hopes to lure tourists
[01:01:18.880 --> 01:01:24.320]  to the indigenous regions of the five southeast states containing the ruins of dozens of ancient
[01:01:24.320 --> 01:01:31.760]  Mayan cities. Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper lashed out at U.S. environmentalists
[01:01:31.760 --> 01:01:37.360]  opposed to Canada's northern gateway pipeline project following Barack Obama's temporary
[01:01:37.360 --> 01:01:44.960]  rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline from Alberta to the Texas Gulf. The 730-mile northern gateway
[01:01:44.960 --> 01:01:50.640]  would run west from the massive oil sands deposits of northern Alberta across pristine
[01:01:50.640 --> 01:01:56.960]  wilderness and more than 700 rivers and streams to a proposed super tanker port on the Pacific
[01:01:56.960 --> 01:02:02.560]  coast of British Columbia. Harper Monday accused U.S. groups of hijacking public hearings by a
[01:02:02.560 --> 01:02:09.120]  federal regulatory agency which is assessing the environmental impact of the $6.6 billion
[01:02:09.120 --> 01:02:15.760]  pipeline. U.S. and Canadian environmentalists want to stop Alberta's booming oil sands development
[01:02:15.760 --> 01:02:22.080]  noting it comes from massive open pit mining that sells huge swaths of forests, produces millions
[01:02:22.080 --> 01:02:30.320]  of gallons of toxic sludge and increases greenhouse gas emissions. The Serbian Ministry of Environment
[01:02:30.320 --> 01:02:36.640]  and Mining revealed recently parts of southeastern Serbia lie on two billion tons of oil shale
[01:02:36.640 --> 01:02:43.440]  worth roughly $60 billion. Big news for a country with 23% unemployment but the process of oil
[01:02:43.440 --> 01:02:49.040]  extraction from shale through hydraulic fracturing or fracking has been widely documented to cause
[01:02:49.040 --> 01:02:56.160]  ecological devastation. Dejan Skala professor at the technology faculty in Belgrade warns fracking
[01:02:56.160 --> 01:03:01.680]  heavily contaminates underground water adding that surface exploitation or open pit mining
[01:03:01.680 --> 01:03:07.040]  is also highly problematic as it requires rock to be heated to extremely high temperatures
[01:03:07.040 --> 01:03:23.040]  in special facilities leaving the surrounding area looking like the moon's surface.
[01:03:37.040 --> 01:03:59.040]  Okay, we're back, ready to come back to you today. Great. We're about radioed. We're talking, talking
[01:03:59.040 --> 01:04:09.360]  to William and Williamson County. Yeah, I'm here. Williamson, you there? Okay. I am. But back to
[01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:19.280]  the strategy for grievances. We are civil human beings. We live in a civil culture
[01:04:20.400 --> 01:04:25.840]  and it's in this culture it's appropriate to treat one another with civility.
[01:04:25.840 --> 01:04:36.560]  However, when you're dealing with the legal community, that is not part of the civil culture.
[01:04:37.600 --> 01:04:40.800]  That's part of the legal community and there's a different set of rules.
[01:04:42.480 --> 01:04:47.360]  First rule is you will not win your case because you have the law and the facts on your side.
[01:04:47.360 --> 01:05:01.040]  Especially if you per se. Okay, maybe you will. However, it will behoove you to conduct yourself
[01:05:01.040 --> 01:05:07.840]  as if the courts will rule against you out of hand at every term because there's a good chance
[01:05:07.840 --> 01:05:15.120]  they will. If they don't, so much the better, but let's act like they're going to. So how do we get
[01:05:15.120 --> 01:05:21.040]  political influence? How do we create politics? The one thing Ken didn't say about politics
[01:05:22.480 --> 01:05:32.080]  is all, well he kind of alluded to it, all politics is local. You don't create politics in
[01:05:32.080 --> 01:05:39.760]  Washington. You create politics right here. Yes. And the way to create, for a pro se, to create
[01:05:39.760 --> 01:05:48.800]  politics, bar grievances, judicial conduct complaints, criminal complaints, bringing what
[01:05:48.800 --> 01:05:56.000]  these guys are doing out into the glare of sunlight, this is what creates politics.
[01:05:57.600 --> 01:06:04.640]  So you sting that prosecutor good. You sting the judge good. They're not going to like it.
[01:06:04.640 --> 01:06:10.560]  And your tendency is to think, well, if I do anything to make them mad, they'll do something
[01:06:10.560 --> 01:06:18.000]  worse. Well, you got to know they're going to do the worst they can. Okay. It's not about justice.
[01:06:18.560 --> 01:06:25.440]  It's about dollar flow. That's why I have the question, how many, how many bar grievances should
[01:06:25.440 --> 01:06:35.120]  I file for each date that I was summoned to court in denial of due process of law amongst however
[01:06:35.120 --> 01:06:40.240]  many other I can come up with? Well, okay. How many times were you summoned?
[01:06:42.320 --> 01:06:51.920]  No less than six. Okay, then five, 12. No, okay. If you're going to, you know, what you're doing,
[01:06:51.920 --> 01:07:02.960]  here's the deal. In order to play this chess game, if you will, as long as I have without
[01:07:02.960 --> 01:07:11.200]  having already been slaughtered and swept under the rug, I had to hire an attorney. Well, this
[01:07:11.200 --> 01:07:19.680]  attorney only deals with Williamson County. He told me that this particular prosecutor and the
[01:07:19.680 --> 01:07:28.880]  judge with the broken pelvis were the only two honest, decent guys up there and that there's
[01:07:28.880 --> 01:07:36.320]  a bar poll of some sort taking place to rate these judges and prosecutors about their ability to
[01:07:37.840 --> 01:07:43.200]  do whatever it is that they think they're supposed to be doing. Okay. Whoa, hold on. Whoa, stop.
[01:07:43.200 --> 01:07:50.240]  Bar poll? Yeah, yeah, I'll get you some details. I'll see if I can get you some details through Eddie
[01:07:50.880 --> 01:07:57.040]  in the seminar on Sundays at Brave New Books. That's between two and five, correct?
[01:07:58.800 --> 01:08:02.720]  Yeah, but I don't remember ever talking about something like what you're discussing here.
[01:08:03.760 --> 01:08:09.280]  No, he's just going to bring the information there. Yes, I definitely want to know about that.
[01:08:09.280 --> 01:08:19.600]  Okay, back to strategy and politics. Okay, sometimes I'm somewhat facetious when I say
[01:08:20.240 --> 01:08:30.720]  file bar grievance quick, file them often, but file well-crafted grievances. Okay.
[01:08:32.560 --> 01:08:37.360]  And that's not hard. It's like Eddie is a co-host on the show.
[01:08:37.360 --> 01:08:44.000]  The way we first met Eddie is he called into the show and after about the third time he called
[01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:49.920]  in, I told Deborah, we need to get this guy on the show. Yes, sir. But he called in because
[01:08:49.920 --> 01:08:57.120]  he's having these issues and he's trying to find remedy and he called in to find out about how to
[01:08:57.120 --> 01:09:03.680]  file criminal complaints. So we talked about it and then he filed criminal complaints. How many
[01:09:03.680 --> 01:09:17.280]  did you file? 181. But each complaint was a valid criminal complaint in its own right. Right.
[01:09:18.480 --> 01:09:25.520]  Each bar grievance that you filed needs to be valid in its own right, but there is no problem
[01:09:25.520 --> 01:09:35.360]  finding all the bar grievances you can keep up with. The trick is, is look at the grievances
[01:09:35.360 --> 01:09:43.040]  that you file, that you file. Look at what they have done and which ones will tend to
[01:09:44.080 --> 01:09:52.080]  lead the individual reading it toward a conclusion you want them to come to.
[01:09:52.080 --> 01:10:04.560]  The one thing to keep foremost in your mind at all times is what would a grand jury of my peers
[01:10:05.200 --> 01:10:14.880]  think of this document? You don't give a tinkers dam how the bar responds to it or the bar association.
[01:10:14.880 --> 01:10:23.440]  Bar association. How would a grand jury of my peers respond to this? And when you write it,
[01:10:24.240 --> 01:10:30.480]  what would I have to tell members of the grand jury so they would understand what I'm talking
[01:10:30.480 --> 01:10:39.200]  about? You know, if you're talking, if you think you're talking to a judge or a prosecutor, you
[01:10:39.200 --> 01:10:51.280]  you're talking to a council, so you tend to be less specific. I suggest everything you write,
[01:10:51.280 --> 01:10:59.040]  you write it for a grand jury of your peers. So every statute that you reference, you need to
[01:10:59.040 --> 01:11:05.920]  give the quotation right there so they can see exactly what you're referencing. Every
[01:11:05.920 --> 01:11:14.400]  standard of, every ethical standard for the bar, you need to...
[01:11:14.400 --> 01:11:19.920]  Isn't that kind of an oxymoron, ethical standard for the bar?
[01:11:21.200 --> 01:11:27.840]  No, well, yeah, I mean, there are morons, I agree with that, but no, no, that's not fair.
[01:11:27.840 --> 01:11:38.880]  The attorneys are trapped in a system they did not create, but they go to law school and,
[01:11:38.880 --> 01:11:45.120]  you know, Ken was just talking to a woman who just got out of law school and she's concerned,
[01:11:45.120 --> 01:11:59.280]  she has this huge, I hate when I lose terms, student loan that she has to pay off.
[01:12:00.800 --> 01:12:06.080]  And she's got to make money, you know, she's stuck with this. So, you know, attorneys,
[01:12:06.960 --> 01:12:14.720]  they get out of law school and they have this debt they have to pay. They get out and they get
[01:12:14.720 --> 01:12:22.800]  into this system they did not create. So they have responsibilities, they have debts they have to pay
[01:12:23.760 --> 01:12:30.640]  and they have a system they have to deal with. You know, I have a book by a guy out of
[01:12:31.760 --> 01:12:38.800]  Austin on malpractice and I'm repeatedly saying, nobody who is an attorney
[01:12:38.800 --> 01:12:45.760]  read this book before he went to law school. Well, all the things he can be sued for. So,
[01:12:46.320 --> 01:12:53.040]  I wouldn't want to be an attorney. Holy crap. I got judges on one side calling down my throat.
[01:12:53.680 --> 01:12:59.440]  I got clients on the other side calling down my throat. I got all these debts I have to pay.
[01:12:59.440 --> 01:13:08.320]  I would not want to be in that position. And I'm suggesting to you that we can help ease their
[01:13:08.320 --> 01:13:20.080]  burden. Now, it may not be easy. Sometimes medicine's bitter. So, we grieve this attorney.
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:27.520]  Gives him plausible deniability to go to the judge and say, this guy's kicking my behind judge.
[01:13:28.400 --> 01:13:36.000]  I need some help here. It won't hurt you because they're going to rule against you anyway.
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:47.440]  So, if we do our jobs right, if when we write a bar grievance, we write one that is well crafted
[01:13:49.440 --> 01:13:56.080]  and keep in mind that everything we're doing is pointing ultimately toward a grand jury anyway.
[01:13:57.840 --> 01:14:02.800]  If what the prosecutor is doing has the effect of denying you one of your rights,
[01:14:02.800 --> 01:14:12.080]  that's essentially a criminal act that could eventually go before a grand jury. So,
[01:14:12.080 --> 01:14:20.480]  you write it that way. Don't assume that the person you're writing it to understands anything.
[01:14:20.480 --> 01:14:28.800]  Don't assume they have in knowledge. When we talked on the show about judges,
[01:14:28.800 --> 01:14:34.800]  what their duties are, they must determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence,
[01:14:35.760 --> 01:14:42.960]  then apply the law as it comes to them, to the facts in the case. So, we have to give it to them.
[01:14:44.240 --> 01:14:48.800]  So, don't assume the judge already knows the law. You've got to put it in front of him.
[01:14:49.440 --> 01:14:55.840]  And the best way to focus your mind so that you do that is write everything for a grand jury.
[01:14:55.840 --> 01:15:02.720]  But in doing that, you will craft some really well put together documents.
[01:15:05.040 --> 01:15:12.800]  Never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth.
[01:15:14.800 --> 01:15:17.040]  Where could I get some well-crafted
[01:15:17.040 --> 01:15:27.520]  complaints? Oh, okay. Go to bargreevance.net and you can produce your own.
[01:15:28.480 --> 01:15:33.280]  Okay. Okay. I have that up and working. It's not working as well as I want.
[01:15:33.920 --> 01:15:42.960]  Okay. But I have the American Bar Association model standards converted to a questionnaire.
[01:15:42.960 --> 01:15:52.640]  And if you walk down through that, that's designed so that when you write a complaint,
[01:15:52.640 --> 01:16:00.560]  when you make an accusation, you will make it in the verbiage of the standard.
[01:16:01.120 --> 01:16:04.560]  Because I took the standard and I think the first one says that the
[01:16:04.560 --> 01:16:14.720]  lawyer shall demonstrate a level of knowledge and proficiency. And I forget what the rest of it says.
[01:16:15.920 --> 01:16:19.360]  So, I took that and I turned it around and I said,
[01:16:20.160 --> 01:16:25.840]  did the lawyer demonstrate a level of knowledge and proficiency and blah, blah, blah.
[01:16:26.960 --> 01:16:30.800]  So that when you write your, if he didn't, then I have a box.
[01:16:30.800 --> 01:16:37.600]  And you put in what he did and I will preface it with, the lawyer failed to demonstrate a level
[01:16:37.600 --> 01:16:44.880]  of knowledge and proficiency by the following and put in what you said. So, the complaint will be
[01:16:44.880 --> 01:16:50.640]  constructed in the verbiage of the standard of filing. Okay. We're going to break. I'll be right
[01:16:50.640 --> 01:17:01.040]  back on the other side. Randy Kelton, David Stevens, and Craig will have my radio. Tyler, Mecca, I see you.
[01:17:01.040 --> 01:17:05.440]  Capital Corn and Bullion is a family-owned and operated business that has helped many families
[01:17:05.440 --> 01:17:10.240]  and friends in protecting their assets. And we would like to do the same for you. In addition
[01:17:10.240 --> 01:17:17.200]  to corns and bullion, we now offer Patriot Saves, ammunition, Berkey water products, gift certificates,
[01:17:17.200 --> 01:17:24.080]  wristbands, and our new Silver Pool, a new way to guarantee silver by prepaying at a locked price.
[01:17:24.080 --> 01:17:33.520]  We can even help you set up a metals IRA account. Call us at 512-646-6440 for more details. As always,
[01:17:33.520 --> 01:17:39.680]  we buy, sell, and trade precious metals and cater to those with all sizes of coin collections.
[01:17:39.680 --> 01:17:47.200]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half a mile north of Canaan, next to the Ichiban
[01:17:47.200 --> 01:17:53.920]  Sushi and the Genie Car Wash. We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 5. Visit
[01:17:53.920 --> 01:18:02.560]  us at capitalcornandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440. What's been the problem with phone companies?
[01:18:02.560 --> 01:18:08.560]  High prices and contracts that lock you in for two years minimum, not freedomtelephones.com.
[01:18:08.560 --> 01:18:14.480]  Freedomtelephones are designed around the concept and reality of patriotism, loyalty, and privacy.
[01:18:14.480 --> 01:18:20.160]  With freedomtelephones.com, there are no contracts, no credit checks, and no social security numbers
[01:18:20.160 --> 01:18:26.240]  required. That's why our name is freedomtelephones.com. Finally, residential, mobile, and business
[01:18:26.240 --> 01:18:30.960]  telephones and plans that are private and never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:30.960 --> 01:18:39.920]  Want a low price? Residential and business plans started only $14.99 and mobile plans started just $39.99. Plus, every month you pay your bill,
[01:18:39.920 --> 01:18:45.680]  freedomtelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs. Don't wait. Support the cause and get
[01:18:45.680 --> 01:18:55.360]  the highest quality and the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553. That's 800-600-5553.
[01:18:55.360 --> 01:19:02.160]  Freedomtelephones.com. Portable, private, perfect.
[01:19:25.360 --> 01:19:33.920]  Okay, we're back. Ready to jump into the break? We'll go over here. We're talking to the
[01:19:33.920 --> 01:19:42.480]  building of Texas. And I don't want to sound like I'm belaboring a point, but this is a really
[01:19:42.480 --> 01:19:51.840]  important point of strategy. In order to write a well-crafted document, you have to assume
[01:19:51.840 --> 01:19:58.800]  that your reader knows absolutely nothing. I understand that we're writing documents to
[01:19:58.800 --> 01:20:07.360]  give to judges, and they're learning counsel, and they're into being experienced learning counsel.
[01:20:08.560 --> 01:20:19.440]  But the judge must apply the law to the facts as it comes to him. So you have to give him the law
[01:20:19.440 --> 01:20:30.960]  so that it comes to him. And we must always have to get them simpler than we'd like to.
[01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:38.720]  It is a discipline, a mental discipline, to be able to do that. So that's why I say,
[01:20:38.720 --> 01:20:42.880]  write everything as if you're going to present it to a grand jury, because
[01:20:42.880 --> 01:20:55.040]  we anticipate that it will end anyway. And bar grievances, same thing. Give them everything.
[01:20:56.160 --> 01:21:04.800]  And never, this is a really important point, make a mental note of this one. This is the hardest
[01:21:04.800 --> 01:21:17.040]  thing for a non-legal professional not to do. Never make a proactive statement of law out of
[01:21:17.040 --> 01:21:28.640]  your own mouth. Never say, he can't do this or he can't do that. You must make that statement
[01:21:28.640 --> 01:21:35.520]  out of the mouth of the court. And the best way to do that is to pledge your rights.
[01:21:37.440 --> 01:21:43.760]  If you're starting out and you don't know how to do this, just go down to the court
[01:21:43.760 --> 01:21:53.520]  and pull cases similar to yours. How do you find this? Ah, just talk to the clerks. The clerks
[01:21:53.520 --> 01:22:01.600]  are really, you know, the one person in the courthouse that I seldom ever have any problem with
[01:22:01.600 --> 01:22:07.440]  is the clerk. They don't have anything to do with prosecution. They could care less.
[01:22:08.240 --> 01:22:14.480]  They just keep the records and just go shmooze them. Talk to them. One of the things I did
[01:22:14.480 --> 01:22:20.720]  when I first started researching, as I went down to the district courthouse in
[01:22:20.720 --> 01:22:26.960]  Boys County, and I asked the clerk to see the thickest file she's got.
[01:22:28.960 --> 01:22:34.480]  And that stopped her in her tracks. She said, thickest? What do you mean thickest? And I took
[01:22:34.480 --> 01:22:42.000]  my hands and spread them apart. Sick! You know, sick! I want to see the cases that were fought the
[01:22:42.000 --> 01:22:53.760]  hardest. And she said, oh, okay. And she thought that was really cool. They went back there and
[01:22:53.760 --> 01:23:03.520]  brought me out some incredible cases. That's where I found the motion in limony. I saw that
[01:23:03.520 --> 01:23:13.440]  saying, what in the heck is that? A 20-something page motion in limony. I had no idea what it was,
[01:23:13.440 --> 01:23:20.240]  but when I looked at it, it was all the questions the other side can't ask. Brady motion. What the
[01:23:20.240 --> 01:23:28.000]  heck is a Brady motion? A 30-page Brady motion. That's discovery to criminal. But, you know,
[01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:31.680]  you can go to law school and do us other stuff. You can go down to the legal library and dig
[01:23:31.680 --> 01:23:40.880]  and scratch. Go pull the cases similar to yours. Ask the clerk, does she remember any cases that go
[01:23:40.880 --> 01:23:51.120]  to a charge like you have? Don't go to the case, don't go to the court where your case is. Go to
[01:23:51.120 --> 01:23:56.000]  another court, like Travis County or somewhere else, where you don't have an issue before the
[01:23:56.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  court, so you're not a threat. And the clerks are, if you treat them with dignity and respect,
[01:24:02.800 --> 01:24:09.840]  they will just bend over back with to help you. And if you can find a case close to yours,
[01:24:12.400 --> 01:24:20.480]  one that's hard fought, you'll find everything you need. And that's the reason I went to that,
[01:24:20.480 --> 01:24:28.720]  is do make a proactive statement out of your own mouth. Look, if you're not familiar with
[01:24:28.720 --> 01:24:39.760]  legal documents, you want to find a brief or points and authorities. Look at points and
[01:24:39.760 --> 01:24:49.760]  authorities briefing support or findings, effect and conclusions of law. These will be in these
[01:24:49.760 --> 01:25:00.240]  format of a brief. In a brief, you argue your point, but the lawyer never makes a proactive
[01:25:00.240 --> 01:25:07.200]  statement of law out of his mouth. He says, the court said this in this case and the court
[01:25:07.200 --> 01:25:17.120]  said this in this case. That's how you must do it. You can make the most convincing argument
[01:25:17.120 --> 01:25:31.520]  and have the most convincing argument. And the judge has no authority to ruin your favor. He
[01:25:31.520 --> 01:25:40.880]  may agree with you, but if you didn't give him any law to hang his hat on, he has no authority to go
[01:25:40.880 --> 01:25:48.400]  along with you. He must, a trial judge, must apply to the law of the law to the facts as it comes
[01:25:48.400 --> 01:25:56.240]  to him. As it comes to him from you through the appeals court, it is the appeals court
[01:25:56.240 --> 01:26:02.960]  who decides what the law means. It is the job of the trial court to apply that
[01:26:02.960 --> 01:26:13.280]  meaning to the law that's in front of him. So, proceeds go in there and the crafties really
[01:26:13.280 --> 01:26:19.920]  well put together arguments and the judge just blows them off. They don't understand.
[01:26:21.200 --> 01:26:28.080]  They didn't give the judge any law to hang his hat on. So, when you write a document or you write a
[01:26:28.080 --> 01:26:37.200]  bar grievance, give the bar something to hang their hat on. Give them the complaint in the
[01:26:37.200 --> 01:26:45.840]  verbiage of the standard that they violated. Now, bar grievance.net I have up. It's not the
[01:26:45.840 --> 01:26:55.920]  text of the standards of Jesus of God. What is it again? There's two in Texas. Texas is the only
[01:26:55.920 --> 01:27:08.720]  state I've ever seen that has two. They have the standards of Texas. I have one for disciplinary
[01:27:08.720 --> 01:27:15.760]  procedure and one for standards of ethics. You have to write it in terms of the standards of
[01:27:15.760 --> 01:27:24.480]  ethics. In the verbiage, you don't have to necessarily cite the statute, but write it in
[01:27:24.480 --> 01:27:32.240]  the verbiage. That way, when the court gets it and meets it, it'll look like all of the other legal
[01:27:32.240 --> 01:27:39.120]  documents it gets. So, all of these guys out here who had legal reform who want to put in
[01:27:39.120 --> 01:27:46.640]  man on the man sovereign citizen, free man, blah, blah, blah, do not put that stuff in there.
[01:27:49.120 --> 01:27:58.240]  Look at the documentation. See how the professional attorneys write their documentation
[01:27:59.200 --> 01:28:06.160]  and write it that way. This is not, this doesn't have to do with moral theory or
[01:28:06.160 --> 01:28:11.360]  that kind of stuff. It has to do with how the living mind of a human animal works.
[01:28:13.360 --> 01:28:21.760]  You do not want to trigger any red flags in the mind of the judge that says,
[01:28:22.880 --> 01:28:30.640]  this guy is a radical right wing wacko Republican Texas nutcase.
[01:28:30.640 --> 01:28:38.800]  When I write a document, the only way I want the court to judge to know that it wasn't written
[01:28:38.800 --> 01:28:45.920]  by an attorney, this is not an attorney signature at the end of it. I definitely do not want to
[01:28:45.920 --> 01:28:54.160]  put some crappole in there that doesn't move the court toward my position, but just tells
[01:28:54.160 --> 01:29:02.640]  him who I am. I'm a sovereign. If you do that, that won't get the outcome. Write it
[01:29:03.600 --> 01:29:12.240]  every statement you make, make it in the terms of the case law and never make a
[01:29:12.240 --> 01:29:15.040]  proactive statement of law if you're on mouth. You have to keep going back to that.
[01:29:15.040 --> 01:29:26.320]  So if you're doing a bar grievance, go to bargremance.net. We have 47 of 50 states have adopted the
[01:29:29.280 --> 01:29:37.680]  American Bar Association standards, and they've made minor adjustments. So it'll be close.
[01:29:37.680 --> 01:29:48.160]  You can use that. I think I'm running on too long. This is just really an important point to get
[01:29:48.160 --> 01:29:53.120]  across. When I come back, I move ahead and get a lot of calls. This is Randy Kelton,
[01:29:53.120 --> 01:30:07.920]  David Stevens, Dave Craig with the radio. We'll be right back.
[01:30:23.120 --> 01:30:37.200]  The city of Oxford, England wants to install audio equipped cameras in taxis so cops can eavesdrop
[01:30:37.200 --> 01:30:42.720]  on passengers' conversations. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll have details about this outrageous
[01:30:42.720 --> 01:30:50.080]  invasion of privacy in a moment. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself,
[01:30:50.080 --> 01:30:54.960]  you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms
[01:30:54.960 --> 01:31:00.800]  will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information
[01:31:00.800 --> 01:31:06.160]  to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to
[01:31:06.160 --> 01:31:12.400]  you by startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start
[01:31:12.400 --> 01:31:19.360]  over with Start Page. Where to, mum? Take me home, driver. It's about the only place left in England
[01:31:19.360 --> 01:31:24.640]  where I can get some privacy. No, that's not a real conversation between me and a British cabbie.
[01:31:24.640 --> 01:31:29.600]  But if the city council of one British community has its way, even dialogue like that would be
[01:31:29.600 --> 01:31:34.960]  recorded and sent to British police with no justification. Britain has already deployed
[01:31:34.960 --> 01:31:40.160]  hundreds of thousands of surveillance cameras in public places. Now officials in Oxford,
[01:31:40.160 --> 01:31:46.320]  England want to record all conversations in taxis. From the moment the cab's engine turns on to a
[01:31:46.320 --> 01:31:51.280]  half an hour after the ignition is turned off, the microphone would be running. Personally,
[01:31:51.280 --> 01:32:17.280]  I'd rather walk. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32:21.280 --> 01:32:45.200]  I hope I don't do that too often. And I would hope that when I do, that you understand this is
[01:32:45.200 --> 01:32:52.800]  really, really important. It's one of the things that's hard for us as ordinary citizens to do
[01:32:53.840 --> 01:33:02.560]  is speak to legalese. And the one thing that'll help you speak to legalese is to discipline
[01:33:02.560 --> 01:33:12.000]  yourself. And not let yourself use the language the way we do in normal civil conversation
[01:33:12.000 --> 01:33:19.600]  from the beginning in law, but only make statements out of the mouth of the court. So that's all I'm
[01:33:19.600 --> 01:33:25.120]  going to say about that. I've probably said too much already. Okay, we're going to go back to be all
[01:33:27.280 --> 01:33:33.280]  people. Does that put you asleep on that last segment? No, I've listened to the show long enough
[01:33:33.280 --> 01:33:39.520]  to realize that when you are on a tangent, if I interrupt you, you don't get to complete it and
[01:33:39.520 --> 01:33:45.040]  everything you said is vitally important. Well, in that one, I was a little uncomfortable. This is
[01:33:45.040 --> 01:33:54.000]  such an important issue. And I really don't know how to craft it the way I want to. So
[01:33:55.200 --> 01:34:02.720]  I'm using my audience as a sounding board to try to work out how to take this
[01:34:02.720 --> 01:34:11.440]  understanding I have in my mind and transfer it from my mind to your mind. And I'm not
[01:34:11.440 --> 01:34:18.080]  so good at that sometimes. I commend you for the job you do. You're doing a great job. All
[01:34:18.080 --> 01:34:22.880]  y'all, everybody's on the air tonight. I don't hear Deborah's charming voice. I'm assuming
[01:34:22.880 --> 01:34:30.400]  she's not on air tonight. No, she's not on air tonight. She's not doing Friday nights.
[01:34:30.400 --> 01:34:39.840]  She's just so busy. I understand. I understand. I understand. I'm an electrical engineer. That's
[01:34:39.840 --> 01:34:48.400]  my training. I've watched Deborah build this network. And this was after WTPRM went down.
[01:34:49.680 --> 01:34:56.800]  And we were both, we're all broke, scrambling, trying to keep something together. And watching
[01:34:56.800 --> 01:35:05.600]  Deborah build this network was absolutely incredible. The level of sophistication
[01:35:06.160 --> 01:35:15.600]  and just downright hard work it took was absolutely incredible. And I remember
[01:35:16.720 --> 01:35:25.280]  clearly the day she got it automated. Because she used to sit on every show and run
[01:35:25.280 --> 01:35:32.960]  every single show. She had to do everything. And at the same time,
[01:35:33.680 --> 01:35:39.840]  build in the automation to make this thing work. I do shows on other people's networks.
[01:35:41.280 --> 01:35:50.320]  And nobody comes close to this one. She has done an incredible job. And I struggle to
[01:35:50.320 --> 01:35:56.480]  honor what she's put together. So if she wants to take Friday's off, absolutely take Friday's off.
[01:35:59.040 --> 01:36:01.760]  Okay. I understand you have the collars.
[01:36:03.360 --> 01:36:09.360]  Yes, I was going to go get here. Bargremances. I like the more the better.
[01:36:11.200 --> 01:36:18.320]  The more well crafted the better. Okay. We certainly don't expect the bar to do anything,
[01:36:18.320 --> 01:36:23.360]  but then we don't care about that. But when we get to the grand jury,
[01:36:25.040 --> 01:36:30.160]  this is what we can expect. The foreman is going to say, well, did you do this? Yeah, I did that.
[01:36:30.800 --> 01:36:35.040]  Well, did you do this? Yeah, I did that. Did you do this over here? Yeah, I did that.
[01:36:35.840 --> 01:36:43.200]  So at Bargremances is one of the things we need to do. When I talk about running the routine,
[01:36:43.200 --> 01:36:53.360]  I try to walk through all of the steps so that when you get to the end and they start saying,
[01:36:53.360 --> 01:37:01.440]  well, did you do this? No matter what they throw at us, we've already done it. And we hope we've
[01:37:01.440 --> 01:37:11.680]  done it well. And Bill, I appreciate you because we do this show and we don't always know if we're
[01:37:11.680 --> 01:37:19.280]  having an effect. A tremendous effect. Thank you very much. Well, you didn't have to tell me that.
[01:37:20.160 --> 01:37:24.240]  I could tell we were having an effect by the things that you were doing. And that is
[01:37:25.360 --> 01:37:30.560]  absolutely more gratifying than I can say. Okay. Thank you. Thank you.
[01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:38.240]  You know, I know that I could Henry these guys forever and it wouldn't make any difference.
[01:37:38.240 --> 01:37:45.520]  The fact that you were out there hammering them the way that I would, that is absolutely gratifying.
[01:37:45.520 --> 01:37:51.680]  That's why I'm here. And I appreciate you. Well, kudos to you and all yours. One more thing I was
[01:37:51.680 --> 01:37:58.240]  going to say. A good place to start would be to go to half price books and look in their law section
[01:37:58.240 --> 01:38:06.720]  because I have found numerous blacks law. I now have one of the other ones. I forget the name of it.
[01:38:06.720 --> 01:38:14.000]  I think it's bill Connors. I found I found Connors. Okay. Let me give you a suggestion and everyone
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:21.840]  else a suggestion. Call your local, call a few law firms and tell them that, you know, I'm homeschooling
[01:38:21.840 --> 01:38:31.840]  kids and I don't want to do a course on law. Do you have any old litigation guides laid around
[01:38:31.840 --> 01:38:42.560]  that you're not using anymore? I told a woman this in Amarillo, the second law firm
[01:38:44.560 --> 01:38:55.760]  said, do you have a pickup truck or a station wagon? Litigation guides. This is, this is more
[01:38:55.760 --> 01:39:06.880]  important than I originally understood. Almost everybody uses the litigation guides. You want
[01:39:06.880 --> 01:39:13.040]  to know how to file a rehabious corpus or read a mandamus. Go to litigation guides. The litigation
[01:39:13.040 --> 01:39:21.120]  guide will tell you how to file it, when to file it. It'll give you a blank form to use to file it with.
[01:39:21.120 --> 01:39:27.360]  They'll say, you know, keep the paragraph that's appropriate throughout the rest. It has case law
[01:39:27.360 --> 01:39:32.320]  in there. You know, when I first looked at it, I thought that was really neat. You know, this is
[01:39:32.320 --> 01:39:41.120]  great. But later on, I realized something even more important. The judges keep seeing
[01:39:42.160 --> 01:39:48.560]  documents created from the litigation guides over and over and over.
[01:39:48.560 --> 01:39:59.440]  So when you take, for instance, O'Connor's forms, then you file a motion that you took the form
[01:39:59.440 --> 01:40:07.200]  in O'Connor's and crafted your motion for that form. The judge is going to get it. And he's going
[01:40:07.200 --> 01:40:15.920]  to see a form crafted exactly like most of the forms he gets. He's going to see a motion quoting
[01:40:15.920 --> 01:40:23.280]  precisely the same case law that most every other document of the same nature he gets.
[01:40:24.400 --> 01:40:27.840]  So he sees this case law. You don't have to mess with it. You don't have to read it.
[01:40:27.840 --> 01:40:32.720]  You don't have to think about it. He can just skim right over it and go to the salient part of the
[01:40:32.720 --> 01:40:39.360]  motion. These poor things out here like me, we get out here and do all this research. We give the
[01:40:39.360 --> 01:40:46.160]  judge a very well crafted document with 20 cases in it the judge has never seen.
[01:40:48.240 --> 01:40:57.120]  And he looks at that and he says, are you kidding me? Screw that. He rules against you.
[01:40:59.040 --> 01:41:02.320]  Now that may not be right, but it goes to human nature.
[01:41:02.320 --> 01:41:09.760]  If we want to win our cases, we have to understand how it works. So
[01:41:11.840 --> 01:41:18.000]  call an attorney. Every law firm buys new litigation guides every time they come out
[01:41:18.880 --> 01:41:25.600]  because they want to quote the latest law. Well, we're proceeds. We don't have to quote
[01:41:25.600 --> 01:41:35.680]  19 2012 law. We can quote 2010 law and do just fine because seminal cases
[01:41:37.680 --> 01:41:44.080]  are seldom changed. There'll be cases that refer to the seminal case.
[01:41:44.880 --> 01:41:50.880]  And that's what the litigation guide does. It says this case here in 2011
[01:41:50.880 --> 01:41:59.120]  cited this seminal case back here. They don't cite the seminal case. They cite the 2011 case
[01:42:00.160 --> 01:42:05.360]  that references the seminal case. And that tells the court, this is still good law.
[01:42:06.800 --> 01:42:13.120]  This is what all the attorneys want to do. So every time a new set of litigation guide come out,
[01:42:14.080 --> 01:42:19.120]  they buy all the new ones. And he got all these old ones sitting here. They don't want the attorneys
[01:42:19.120 --> 01:42:26.320]  using them because they don't want them quoting old law. So you call them up and offer to get them
[01:42:26.320 --> 01:42:32.720]  out of their way for them. They'll give you all the information that you need. And they'll give it
[01:42:32.720 --> 01:42:38.160]  to you if you're free. Sounds good. Eddie, how many did they give you last time?
[01:42:38.160 --> 01:42:47.360]  I got an entire federal law library. Awesome. That's great. Great news.
[01:42:49.120 --> 01:42:54.480]  Okay, now we're going to move ahead. Thank you, Bill. I appreciate your time.
[01:42:55.040 --> 01:42:59.600]  Thank you very much. Okay, we're going to go to Tyler in Wyoming.
[01:42:59.600 --> 01:43:09.440]  Yeah, Randy, how are you guys doing tonight? Glad to see you back. This is another guy who
[01:43:09.440 --> 01:43:14.480]  knows his business. Okay, what do you have for us tonight? Well, first of all, thanks for taking
[01:43:14.480 --> 01:43:21.840]  my call. I had a comment, actually a couple of comments for your listeners. And I've been thinking
[01:43:21.840 --> 01:43:29.200]  of the courts, whether that be, I know that you guys talk about mainly traffic courts and citations
[01:43:29.200 --> 01:43:36.080]  and so forth. But also in the, I guess, we're going to break out. Oh, well, you've used up your
[01:43:36.080 --> 01:43:43.520]  time, Tyler. Yeah, I'm out. Okay, just kidding. Okay. Now, okay, we'll pick you up on the other side.
[01:43:43.520 --> 01:43:51.920]  This is Randy Kelp and Stephen J. Crank. We have our radio, our calling number is 512-646-1984.
[01:43:51.920 --> 01:44:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:05.760]  At hempusa.org, we offer chemical free products to people around the world, detoxifying,
[01:44:05.760 --> 01:44:10.800]  self-healing while rebuilding the immune system. We urge our listeners to please consider our
[01:44:10.800 --> 01:44:18.400]  largest selling product, micro plant powder. Our micro plant powder is rich in iodine, probiotics,
[01:44:18.400 --> 01:44:23.680]  zinc and silica to help rebuild the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[01:44:23.680 --> 01:44:28.080]  Micro plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage
[01:44:28.080 --> 01:44:33.360]  shelter. We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org. And remember,
[01:44:33.360 --> 01:44:38.560]  all of our products are chemical free and healthy to eat. We constantly strive to give you the best
[01:44:38.560 --> 01:44:43.440]  service, highest quality and rapid shipping anywhere. And we offer free shipping on orders
[01:44:43.440 --> 01:44:54.880]  over $95 in the U.S. Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-691-2608. That's 908-691-2608.
[01:44:54.880 --> 01:44:59.520]  See what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:45:00.640 --> 01:45:03.200]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.760 --> 01:45:08.560]  When your case without an attorney, with jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to
[01:45:08.560 --> 01:45:16.560]  understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer,
[01:45:16.560 --> 01:45:21.440]  know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for
[01:45:21.440 --> 01:45:28.480]  yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary
[01:45:28.480 --> 01:45:34.960]  was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not
[01:45:34.960 --> 01:45:40.640]  in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices
[01:45:40.640 --> 01:45:46.320]  that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[01:45:46.320 --> 01:45:54.720]  tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:45:54.720 --> 01:46:06.160]  and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:24.720 --> 01:46:42.000]  We're talking to Tyler in Wyoming. Okay, Tyler, what do you have for us today?
[01:46:43.200 --> 01:46:48.080]  Well, what I want to do stress tonight is something that's been on my mind in my studies
[01:46:48.080 --> 01:46:53.920]  and different things that you see. When you're talking about the trial course,
[01:46:53.920 --> 01:47:01.200]  so when you get into court, I guess my main concerns would be the conflict of interest.
[01:47:02.160 --> 01:47:07.680]  And that, of course, makes up a lot of your show when these people call them. They have these
[01:47:07.680 --> 01:47:13.040]  problems and I believe that's because of the conflict of interest. And what I mean by that is
[01:47:13.040 --> 01:47:19.760]  pretty obvious, but for those that don't know, it's the judge, for example, and the prosecutor
[01:47:19.760 --> 01:47:25.840]  are on the same team. Basically, their paycheck comes from government. So when you have a case
[01:47:25.840 --> 01:47:37.360]  from government against the civilian, there's an automatic unbiased trial there. And you can't
[01:47:37.360 --> 01:47:43.520]  get a fair trial, of course, without a jury, an unbiased jury. The problem with that is
[01:47:43.520 --> 01:47:51.520]  the judge instructs the jury, basically he lies to the jury, okay, he instructs the jury
[01:47:52.960 --> 01:48:00.080]  that I will tell you what the law is, basically. And you just, you might decide the fact,
[01:48:00.080 --> 01:48:03.680]  you might not even do that. You basically just sit there and I tell you what to think.
[01:48:04.560 --> 01:48:09.600]  And that's how you rule. And the problem is, and I guess the point that I'm trying,
[01:48:09.600 --> 01:48:15.200]  I'm trying to get this out to people so they understand this, if they're ever on a jury,
[01:48:15.200 --> 01:48:19.040]  and this is from the history of our country, this is not bogus stuff, they'll make it up.
[01:48:20.160 --> 01:48:25.120]  The juries were always designed, since I think the first jury I believe was John Jay's,
[01:48:27.760 --> 01:48:33.440]  always, for the sense that the history of this country was to decide first the law and the facts.
[01:48:33.440 --> 01:48:39.280]  In other words, if it was a bad law, if it was an unconstitutional law,
[01:48:40.640 --> 01:48:47.520]  it was the obligation of the jury to overthrow that and find that person not guilty.
[01:48:48.640 --> 01:48:59.120]  Exactly. Thomas Jefferson said that the jury was the ultimate check to the balance of bad law.
[01:48:59.120 --> 01:49:06.880]  If the legislature passed the law and the jury refused to enforce the law,
[01:49:06.880 --> 01:49:14.960]  they would have to change it. Absolutely. And, you know, my main concern is,
[01:49:14.960 --> 01:49:20.560]  I see people getting railroaded, I hear about it in the news, I see it in papers, a lot of it.
[01:49:21.600 --> 01:49:25.680]  And it's not just this, but a lot of it is the federal IRS tax cases,
[01:49:25.680 --> 01:49:32.400]  which it is paramount history. Everybody knows, most people know now that there is no,
[01:49:33.760 --> 01:49:40.160]  they don't have a statute, you know, that was enacted by Congress to justify the
[01:49:40.160 --> 01:49:47.440]  incontext on most Americans, but yet they act as though they do, and they never have to show it in court.
[01:49:47.440 --> 01:49:56.000]  Okay, there is, okay, here, there is one thing that I would like to address here.
[01:49:58.160 --> 01:50:07.120]  We really land on the IRS agent, and, you know, there's this argument of show me the law.
[01:50:09.120 --> 01:50:15.120]  The problem is, most people aren't aware of this, even your master file,
[01:50:15.120 --> 01:50:23.200]  there is an employment code. This is where the front takes place. When these guys say,
[01:50:23.200 --> 01:50:29.200]  show me the law that makes me a taxpayer, go to the employment code in the master file.
[01:50:30.640 --> 01:50:38.640]  I had a friend down here who thought he was a real, an insurance agent for state farm insurance in
[01:50:38.640 --> 01:50:45.760]  Austin, but according to the IRS, he was a narcotics salesman in the Virgin Islands,
[01:50:48.240 --> 01:50:58.400]  and that code made him a taxpayer. So the very first thing you should do
[01:50:58.400 --> 01:51:09.360]  is request your master file from the IRS or request your employment code from the IRS
[01:51:10.480 --> 01:51:18.560]  and challenge that employment code. I think they've got a computer out there that just
[01:51:18.560 --> 01:51:28.800]  assigns random employment code numbers to American citizens. That's where the real fraud is. Now that's
[01:51:28.800 --> 01:51:36.480]  as long as, what again, the master file of the employment code? Yeah, everybody has a master
[01:51:36.480 --> 01:51:44.160]  file, an IRS master file. And in that file, there's an employment code. So if an IRS agent
[01:51:44.160 --> 01:51:51.600]  looks at your master file and it says you are a narcotics salesman in the Virgin Islands, then
[01:51:51.600 --> 01:52:00.320]  you are liable for the tax. Now when he comes and finds you sitting in Austin, Texas, selling
[01:52:00.320 --> 01:52:06.960]  insurance, it should be clear to him that there is an error in the employment code.
[01:52:07.920 --> 01:52:14.080]  Right. Yeah, that's what they're doing. They're misapplying the law. I'm not trying
[01:52:14.080 --> 01:52:22.400]  to deceive people. There is an actual income tax, but it only applies, for example, to a foreigner
[01:52:22.400 --> 01:52:31.440]  of making money here or somebody making money overseas that lives here. And there's a section
[01:52:31.440 --> 01:52:36.480]  there, title point six of the alcohol tobacco and firearms, you know, for distributors or such
[01:52:36.480 --> 01:52:45.520]  things like that. Well, that part's not exactly true. Only an employee can be a taxpayer. And an
[01:52:45.520 --> 01:52:52.000]  employee by definition in the tax code is a federal employee. It's not anyone else overseas
[01:52:52.000 --> 01:52:58.480]  or otherwise. Yes, I agree with you, Eddie, very much. I'm learning more about that now,
[01:52:59.040 --> 01:53:04.320]  that it's mainly just for federal employees. That's the whole idea where the return came from.
[01:53:04.320 --> 01:53:12.080]  Because there's no, it's like, people think of this this way, the idea of a return. If I borrow a
[01:53:12.080 --> 01:53:18.480]  shovel, I have to return it because it belongs to somebody else. And the internal revenue would
[01:53:18.480 --> 01:53:23.040]  stand for the internal revenue of the federal government. And I'm learning this, I understand
[01:53:23.040 --> 01:53:28.640]  this now. So if a federal employee working for the federal government, they have contracted
[01:53:28.640 --> 01:53:35.600]  with the federal government. So the idea is, at the end of the year, they give a certain return
[01:53:35.600 --> 01:53:42.320]  of the extra... Hold on. I finally had someone explain this to me so it made sense.
[01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:49.680]  The federal government, if you're an employee of the federal government, they pay you X amount of
[01:53:49.680 --> 01:54:01.840]  money. And over the period of a year, they pay you more money than you actually have coming
[01:54:02.640 --> 01:54:10.080]  because they expect you to have certain deductions. If you don't have those deductions,
[01:54:10.800 --> 01:54:16.480]  you have to take this extra money they give you and return it to the federal government.
[01:54:16.480 --> 01:54:26.240]  That's where the return comes from. They pay you the maximum amount and say, okay,
[01:54:26.240 --> 01:54:31.680]  you got this guy here who's single, and you got this guy here who's got two children. Well,
[01:54:31.680 --> 01:54:39.280]  if he's got two children, then he has two deductions. And, you know, ordinarily,
[01:54:39.280 --> 01:54:45.200]  if he would have to return all this money to him, but you can reduce the amount you return,
[01:54:45.200 --> 01:54:50.640]  have to give back by this deduction and this deduction and this deduction.
[01:54:52.000 --> 01:54:59.840]  Right. That's what the deduction is. The deduction is what you have to give back.
[01:55:00.800 --> 01:55:06.480]  Okay. I appreciate you clearing that up for me. I just had a quick comment,
[01:55:06.480 --> 01:55:08.880]  if I could real quick. I know you probably have another call or two.
[01:55:08.880 --> 01:55:14.640]  Yeah, go ahead. What disturbs me about this is the amount of tyranny and the power,
[01:55:14.640 --> 01:55:19.600]  the overreach from this federal bureaucracy. And I, you know, you hear about people,
[01:55:19.600 --> 01:55:23.040]  some of them senior citizens who have worked hard all their lives being kicked out of their home.
[01:55:24.240 --> 01:55:30.080]  And I asked this, you know, people in this country who care, you know, that they need to stand up
[01:55:30.080 --> 01:55:36.560]  and they need to realize that this is a monster that needs addressed. And in the way, the best way
[01:55:36.560 --> 01:55:40.480]  they can do that, people say, well, you can't do anything about it. Yes, you can. When you're on
[01:55:40.480 --> 01:55:48.960]  the juries, you know, remember this and, and, and vote appropriately for justice to the citizen,
[01:55:48.960 --> 01:55:53.760]  not the overreaching power of the government. And that's the main thing that I like to share with
[01:55:53.760 --> 01:55:58.880]  people because we're not doing it enough. You know, they're speaking out there, you know,
[01:55:58.880 --> 01:56:04.240]  spreading their propaganda and they're stealing houses left to right, even people homeless.
[01:56:04.240 --> 01:56:10.720]  And that's not America. You know, that's not what our founding fathers designed us to live under.
[01:56:11.360 --> 01:56:15.840]  And you can't live under it. And unfortunately, I want to wake people up to this. They're also,
[01:56:15.840 --> 01:56:19.920]  unless it's declared unconstitutional, and I hope it is because I know it already is,
[01:56:20.640 --> 01:56:26.720]  the IRS is going to be enforcing the, I call it Obamacare, the new socialized healthcare that
[01:56:26.720 --> 01:56:32.080]  will be coming about 2014. And then we'll really have a disaster. If you, if people think they're
[01:56:32.080 --> 01:56:38.640]  best now, we'll really have a disaster then. So, you know, I'm thinking, I'm thinking that
[01:56:39.840 --> 01:56:46.720]  after the next election, everything's going to change. I sure hope so. The previous election,
[01:56:46.720 --> 01:56:57.600]  we had 63 new Congress, largest turnover in the history of the Congress. And last election,
[01:56:57.600 --> 01:57:05.600]  they went into the election with an 11% approval rate. I was watching an interview recently with
[01:57:05.600 --> 01:57:13.440]  a first term Congressman and the interviewer, this was on national TV. It wasn't on the internet.
[01:57:13.440 --> 01:57:22.080]  This was in the paid for broadcast media. The interviewer said they mentioned that the
[01:57:22.080 --> 01:57:31.120]  legislature's going into this election now at a 9% approval rating. Now, the last one,
[01:57:31.120 --> 01:57:37.600]  this amount of time before they were at 12%, and the time it got to the election and went down to
[01:57:37.600 --> 01:57:46.320]  11, we're starting out at a 9%. And they mentioned that to this first term Congressman. He said,
[01:57:46.320 --> 01:57:53.520]  where are those people? I haven't found any of those. I haven't found anybody who approves of us.
[01:57:55.600 --> 01:58:05.920]  And this all goes to the nature of things. Things have a way of balancing themselves.
[01:58:07.360 --> 01:58:13.120]  We're looking at going into this next election with less than a 9% approval rating.
[01:58:13.120 --> 01:58:21.040]  And in these circumstances, we may not know who to vote for, but we don't sure know who to vote
[01:58:21.040 --> 01:58:28.160]  against. The last time we had 63 turnover, and that's been given the legislature a fit.
[01:58:29.520 --> 01:58:37.600]  Next time we can expect more. And these people will right the wrongs of the last 15 years.
[01:58:37.600 --> 01:58:45.200]  I am confident and I'm encouraged in what I see happening. And I'll address that a little bit
[01:58:45.200 --> 01:58:50.960]  more when I come back. This is Randy Kelk, David Stevens, Eddie Craig, little brother radio. We'll
[01:58:50.960 --> 01:59:04.960]  be right back on the other side. Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible
[01:59:04.960 --> 01:59:10.640]  called the New Testament recovery version. The New Testament recovery version has over 9,000
[01:59:10.640 --> 01:59:16.800]  footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know
[01:59:16.800 --> 01:59:22.720]  the meaning of life. Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at
[01:59:22.720 --> 01:59:33.040]  888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes
[01:59:33.040 --> 01:59:39.840]  with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:39.840 --> 01:59:45.120]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery
[01:59:45.120 --> 02:00:03.600]  version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.