ROL_2011-12-26_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.000]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[00:05.000 --> 00:12.000]  Critics are questioning whether a recent bill to strengthen pipeline safety regulations goes far enough to prevent oil and natural gas accidents.
[00:12.000 --> 00:19.000]  Up to 15 people a year are killed in more than 100 hazardous liquid spills and 275 accidents.
[00:19.000 --> 00:27.000]  The bill doubles fines and hires 10 additional inspectors, but doesn't require installation of shut off valves on existing pipelines.
[00:27.000 --> 00:32.000]  There are currently 134 inspectors for 2.5 million miles of pipelines.
[00:32.000 --> 00:42.000]  A Chinese court Friday sentenced democracy activist Chen Wei to nine years for, quote, inciting subversion of state power.
[00:42.000 --> 00:53.000]  The case against Chen, a former student leader who was jailed after the 1989 Tiananmen Square uprising, was based on his online essays calling for political reforms.
[00:53.000 --> 01:03.000]  Chen, who was not allowed to make a statement, called out as he was hurried from the courtroom, quote, democracy will win, dictatorship will be defeated.
[01:03.000 --> 01:18.000]  A study from the University of California San Francisco has found California hospitals serving predominantly black patients and those on Medicaid were more likely to shut their emergency rooms than hospitals with fewer black patients and hospitals run for profit.
[01:18.000 --> 01:29.000]  Co-author Dr. Wesley Fields noted nearly all hospitals operate in the private sector, even if they are non-profit, and gravitate into areas with higher household income.
[01:29.000 --> 01:42.000]  Thousands of police forces across the U.S. have been on a military gear buying spree, aided by more than $34 billion in federal government grants since 9-11.
[01:42.000 --> 01:56.000]  A new report from the Center for Investigative Reporting details how the federal spending, awarded with little oversight from Washington, has fueled a rapid transformation of police operations to rely on quasi-military tactics and equipment.
[01:56.000 --> 02:08.000]  Since the emergence of Occupy Wall Street this fall, confusion about how to respond put some police departments in the spotlight for using riot gear, pepper spray and rubber bullets against protesters.
[02:08.000 --> 02:25.000]  The town of Fargo, North Dakota, has received more than $8 million in federal grants for terrorism defense, yet Fargo has averaged fewer than two homicides a year since 2005, and no one has been prosecuted for terrorism for at least a decade.
[02:25.000 --> 02:39.000]  U.S. and Canadian Christmas trees have flooded Mexico in recent years. This holiday season alone, more than a million trees have been imported outnumbering the 700,000 trees provided by Mexican growers.
[02:39.000 --> 02:46.000]  Mexican farmers and politicians complain they face unfair competition from wealthy subsidized U.S. plantations.
[02:46.000 --> 02:57.000]  Trade across the Rio Grande has increased steadily since the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed in 1994, and tariffs on most products were phased out over the next few years.
[02:57.000 --> 03:17.000]  In 1993, goods worth a total of $80 billion were traded between Mexico and the U.S. In 2010, this had shot up to $392 billion.
[03:27.000 --> 03:42.000]  The U.S. and the U.S. have been working together for over a decade.
[03:42.000 --> 03:56.000]  The U.S. and the U.S. have been working together for over a decade.
[03:56.000 --> 04:08.000]  All right, folks, good evening. This is Rule of Law Radio. This is the 26th of December 2011 show we are live tonight, the day after Christmas.
[04:08.000 --> 04:18.000]  I hope everyone had a good Christmas for those of you that celebrate it and know what a tax is supposed to mean, even if you don't.
[04:18.000 --> 04:27.000]  There's a couple things I want to go over tonight, none of which are too long. I'm going to go ahead and open up the caller bridge for callers, so if you want to go ahead and get in line, that will be fine.
[04:27.000 --> 04:37.000]  The calling number is 512-646-1984. If you've got any questions or issues you want to call in and talk about, just go ahead and get on the caller bridge.
[04:37.000 --> 04:54.000]  What I have shouldn't take too long, but what it deals with is I want to show you an example of how our legislators used to think about the powers of the legislature to do something in particular.
[04:54.000 --> 05:04.000]  In this particular case, I am going to be reading from the floor debates during the 1876 Texas Constitutional Convention.
[05:04.000 --> 05:13.000]  Now, what I'm going to be reading is from one of the legislators. Let me see if I can get his name for you here.
[05:13.000 --> 05:39.000]  Let's see, Mr. Samson, S-A-N-S-O-M, he was a representative, and what he was doing is this discussion is regarding the funding of public schools and levying taxes for that purpose.
[05:39.000 --> 05:52.000]  Now, this is one of those areas where they have constantly been stealing money from the public under the guise of paying for the public schools.
[05:52.000 --> 06:03.000]  The Texas Supreme Court ruled in 1995 that this method of taxation for funding the public schools was completely illegal because it constituted a state income tax.
[06:03.000 --> 06:12.000]  It was illegal under the Texas Constitution, yet it's been in place for how long before someone got the good sense to challenge it.
[06:12.000 --> 06:25.000]  But let's look at how this pertains to taxes in general as we read through this, but understand this is the thought process that was actually going through Representative Samson's mind at the time.
[06:25.000 --> 06:34.000]  And he's going down through here and he's given his opinion about whether or not public schools should be funded by the state at all.
[06:34.000 --> 06:39.000]  And this is where he begins an address where it reads,
[06:39.000 --> 06:59.000]  Intrinsically considered, this subject has no importance, for if the question of the power of a state government to exercise exclusive control over the education of the youth of the state was presented for the first time in this house today, the state constitution being silent upon it,
[06:59.000 --> 07:12.000]  I do not hesitate to say that I believe there could not be found a dozen members of this convention who would affirm their belief in the existence of such power in the state.
[07:12.000 --> 07:14.000]  You got that?
[07:14.000 --> 07:31.000]  We have a representative who says that the state does not and has never had the power to control the youth of the state for the purpose of education.
[07:31.000 --> 07:37.000]  Now remember, this is the 1876 constitutional debates.
[07:37.000 --> 07:51.000]  Now it goes on, okay, its importance grows out of its relations to the history, both civil and judicial, of the states forming the American Union.
[07:51.000 --> 08:04.000]  The power has time and again been exercised by the state legislatures and its legitimacy has been affirmed by the courts and law writers of the country and hence its importance.
[08:04.000 --> 08:24.000]  We are here, sir, as the delegates of the people of Texas, having committed to our custody their sovereign and inherent powers, charged with the duty, the highest which could be devolved upon us, of framing a state government adapted to their conditions and wants,
[08:24.000 --> 08:40.000]  with the power to invest the different departments of the new government with the exercise of such of these sovereign powers as may be deemed best, to limit the state in the exercise of such powers as may be dangerous to the liberties of the people
[08:40.000 --> 08:50.000]  and to forbid expressly the exercise of any power which we deem to be subversive to the purposes for which Republican government is established.
[08:50.000 --> 09:14.000]  And now remains to be seen whether the patriotism and intelligence of this body are adequate to the great undertaking of framing a government amply provided with power to afford protection to life, liberty and property and yet totally devoid of power to encroach upon the domain of either individual right or private duty.
[09:14.000 --> 09:25.000]  Now, folks, that is a fine testament as to someone who truly understands the limitation of a state government.
[09:25.000 --> 09:34.000]  When it says that they are invested with the duty to carry out the sovereign powers and duties of the people.
[09:34.000 --> 09:52.000]  This brings us back to something I've touched on several times before and I'm going to do it again. Why? Because it's important for us to remember and understand about what our power is, why we have it, how we have it and what we can reasonably do with it.
[09:52.000 --> 10:07.000]  Now, here this gentleman is opining the fact that this body doesn't understand the limits of its own power. Its power is limited to those that came from the people.
[10:07.000 --> 10:18.000]  Well, let's talk about what powers the people have. Then we can understand what powers the people can delegate.
[10:18.000 --> 10:35.000]  First off, every power the people has is an individual right and power. It's not a collective right. It's an individual right. All rights are individual rights.
[10:35.000 --> 10:50.000]  No matter how you start talking about for the greater good or for the benefit of the society and so on and so forth, society is a fiction. It has no rights.
[10:50.000 --> 11:06.000]  Only the individuals of society have rights and as such, again, those rights can be only individual rights.
[11:06.000 --> 11:22.000]  Now, what can I do with my individual rights? Can I use my individual right to inflict harm on someone else without justification? Absolutely not.
[11:22.000 --> 11:33.000]  That's not a right that I have. It's not an individual right in anybody to inflict harm against someone else just because you can.
[11:33.000 --> 11:44.000]  Now, do I have the individual right to inflict harm on another who is attempting to harm me? Absolutely.
[11:44.000 --> 11:55.000]  I have the right to defend my person, my property, or any other human being and their property from an unjust harm by any outsider.
[11:55.000 --> 12:06.000]  I don't even need my neighbor's permission to seek to protect his property from a known harm.
[12:06.000 --> 12:26.000]  If I see someone trying to burn his house down and I know he isn't home or that he is asleep or is incapable of defending himself in any way to prevent this from occurring, I have an absolute right to assist him in doing exactly that.
[12:26.000 --> 12:38.000]  That's the power of my individual right. I can't give that right to anyone else because they already possess it.
[12:38.000 --> 12:44.000]  Everyone has those same rights.
[12:44.000 --> 12:58.000]  Isn't that how the Founding Fathers put it? All men are created equal. Well, if we're all created equal and we're all endowed our rights and powers by Almighty God, then our powers and rights are equal from the beginning.
[12:58.000 --> 13:08.000]  In which case you have just as much right to defend yourself and your property or that of your neighbor as I do. I can't give you that power. You've already got it.
[13:08.000 --> 13:17.000]  Now, by the same token, I can't give away a power that I don't possess.
[13:17.000 --> 13:33.000]  Okay, let's talk about that for a second. I do not have a right or any authoritative power to take a piece of property from one man and give it to another.
[13:33.000 --> 13:48.000]  Nor do I have an inherent right or power to tell one man that he must pay me or someone else a tax for what he rightfully owns.
[13:48.000 --> 14:00.000]  I don't have that. That is not a right inherent in me. If it is not a right inherent in me, I can't give it away to someone else.
[14:00.000 --> 14:09.000]  Notice that these rights do not change simply because the number of individuals involved changes.
[14:09.000 --> 14:20.000]  It doesn't matter whether three of us tell the one neighbor he has to pay the tax or 10 of us telling or 100 of us telling.
[14:20.000 --> 14:39.000]  None of us as individuals have that power and authority. None of us can give it to each other and simply by accumulation of numbers, that right still was not vested in us.
[14:39.000 --> 14:47.000]  So how would that have to occur? How do we get that tax out of this guy? There's only one way, force.
[14:47.000 --> 15:00.000]  We have to use force to extract this tax from this individual to be paid to that individual if he doesn't want to voluntarily pay it.
[15:00.000 --> 15:18.000]  So again, do I have the individual right to exercise force against another in order to make them pay a tax they don't want to pay? No, I don't.
[15:18.000 --> 15:31.000]  I've never had that power. And again, accumulation of numbers changes nothing. Changes absolutely nothing.
[15:31.000 --> 15:41.000]  None of this makes me a king over anybody else. I can never be a king over anyone but me and my property.
[15:41.000 --> 15:50.000]  That's where the sovereignty of the individual comes in. What's mine is mine. What's yours is yours. Leave me alone. I leave you alone.
[15:50.000 --> 15:57.000]  You need help. I'll assist you if I can or so desire, but I can't be compelled to do so.
[15:57.000 --> 16:07.000]  If I wish to voluntarily pay a tax to support some endeavor that I agree with, fine, but you can't compel me to do so.
[16:07.000 --> 16:17.000]  You especially can't compel me to pay a tax to support some endeavor that I don't like or disagree with.
[16:17.000 --> 16:31.000]  When any man tells another, I don't care if you don't like abortion. I don't care if you don't like having to pay $5 extra a week from your paycheck to support presidential policy.
[16:31.000 --> 16:40.000]  By force of arms, you're going to pay it. That's not freedom, people. Not even close.
[16:40.000 --> 16:47.000]  Alright, we're about to go to break. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show. I am Eddie Craig with Denver Stevens, Randy Kelton.
[16:47.000 --> 17:02.000]  Call in number is 512-646-1984. Give us a call, folks. We'll be right back on the other side of the break.
[17:02.000 --> 17:20.000]  It's the story of a lost city, lost opportunity, lost hope, a story of failed policies, failed leadership, a story of smooth-talking politicians, games of he said, she said, rhetoric, and division.
[17:20.000 --> 17:33.000]  One man has stood apart, stood strong, and true. Voting against every tax increase, every unfound budget, every time.
[17:33.000 --> 17:50.000]  Standing up to the Washington Machine, guided by Principal Ron Paul, the one who will stop the spending, save the dollar, create jobs, bring peace, the one who will restore liberty.
[17:50.000 --> 17:57.000]  Ron Paul, the one who can beat Obama and restore America now.
[17:57.000 --> 18:04.000]  I'm Ron Paul, and I approve this message.
[18:28.000 --> 18:38.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mirris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.000 --> 18:49.000]  Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email Michael Mirris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 18:57.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.000 --> 19:24.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:24.000 --> 19:32.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio. All that number is 512-646-1984.
[19:32.000 --> 19:41.000]  I know it is the holiday season, folks, and I know that there are people out there that normally listen in orange and some that may still be.
[19:41.000 --> 19:46.000]  So if you are and you've got anything going on, comments, questions, anything like that, please give us a call.
[19:46.000 --> 19:57.000]  I do enjoy caller participation in the show. I really look forward to it, in fact. People usually call in with something interesting to latch on to if I just go through the callers far enough.
[19:57.000 --> 20:09.000]  Okay, now let me finish up a little bit more on this here. Hopefully everybody is understanding what an individual right is and what it isn't.
[20:09.000 --> 20:22.000]  An individual right is only that which you can exercise without fear of repercussion because it invades or interferes with the rights of another.
[20:22.000 --> 20:33.000]  Okay? Now, I'm sure everyone with an ounce of common sense would agree that when I'm trying to force a guy to do something he doesn't want to do.
[20:33.000 --> 20:50.000]  And I have no authority or grievance against him to make him do it, then I am acting as the aggressor under an authority I do not actually possess.
[20:50.000 --> 20:57.000]  And because of that, that power doesn't inherently exist. It can't exist.
[20:57.000 --> 21:05.000]  So that use of force is a criminal act. It is an act of aggression.
[21:05.000 --> 21:11.000]  This folks is exactly where our current form of government is sitting.
[21:11.000 --> 21:19.000]  Everything it does, it does through the threat and actions of aggression.
[21:19.000 --> 21:29.000]  At least in this sense, Mark Stevens has it 100% correct. No one should provide services at the barrel of a gun.
[21:29.000 --> 21:45.000]  If I don't want your service sticking a gun in my face to compel me to use your service anyway does not empower you to lord over me and to force me to do that.
[21:45.000 --> 21:57.000]  The only reason you're able to even consider making me do it is because you have that gun in my face and at the moment I don't have one to point back at you.
[21:57.000 --> 22:08.000]  Our government has taken that to the absolute extreme. They have quite literally declared war on the people.
[22:08.000 --> 22:17.000]  It's us against them is the mindset. Trust me on this. I've been there. I've listened to it. That's exactly how it is.
[22:17.000 --> 22:24.000]  Deborah's even gone on a rant on it once or twice on the show about their civilians, blah, blah, blah.
[22:24.000 --> 22:30.000]  Well, guess what, Mr. Cop? You're a civilian too.
[22:30.000 --> 22:40.000]  Okay, you have no more power to arrest and incarcerate than I do. Get that through your head.
[22:40.000 --> 22:55.000]  You don't have it. You were not endowed with superhuman rights and powers because you put on a badge in a uniform.
[22:55.000 --> 23:07.000]  And when you start thinking that you are, then that's a tad bit of egomania that doesn't belong in public service.
[23:07.000 --> 23:15.000]  Because the word service is completely lost on you at that point.
[23:15.000 --> 23:21.000]  You don't even see yourselves as a public servant anymore.
[23:21.000 --> 23:26.000]  You see yourself as someone that is privileged above the public.
[23:26.000 --> 23:32.000]  And so you act accordingly with that mindset.
[23:32.000 --> 23:40.000]  I'm one of those people that just isn't going to sit well with. You and I will never agree. You and I will never see eye to eye.
[23:40.000 --> 23:46.000]  And you and I are not going to get along. You can bet on it.
[23:46.000 --> 23:51.000]  Now, that being said, we are going to start taking your calls.
[23:51.000 --> 23:57.000]  I've got several callers up on the board right now. I've got Joe, Clint and Barrett.
[23:57.000 --> 24:02.000]  We're going to go ahead and take Joe. Joe, what can I do for you?
[24:02.000 --> 24:13.000]  Eddie, question. Let's say I go and go through this process. I go pay my ticket and everything's done and I've found guilty or plead guilty, whatever.
[24:13.000 --> 24:25.000]  The question I have is, can I go back after I find out, let's say the DOT and the information that I have to appeal that?
[24:25.000 --> 24:32.000]  In other words, it's like you buying a home and then you find out later that the mortgage company, you know...
[24:32.000 --> 24:33.000]  No.
[24:33.000 --> 24:35.000]  You can't go back.
[24:35.000 --> 24:41.000]  No. This is a criminal case. The adjudication of guilt has been made.
[24:41.000 --> 24:48.000]  The only way that you can go back at this point is to prove the court lacked all jurisdiction in the first instance.
[24:48.000 --> 25:00.000]  And the problem is, is you plead guilty, thus giving up that ability right there because you admitted that you were doing the very thing they were accusing you of.
[25:00.000 --> 25:05.000]  But it seems to me that they know already they're doing this to the people.
[25:05.000 --> 25:12.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Whether or not they know it is irrelevant in the situation you're giving me to work with here.
[25:12.000 --> 25:19.000]  You plead guilty. That doesn't undo the crime you committed, does it?
[25:19.000 --> 25:20.000]  No.
[25:20.000 --> 25:25.000]  You said, I'm guilty. I did it. So that doesn't undo the act, does it?
[25:25.000 --> 25:27.000]  No.
[25:27.000 --> 25:43.000]  So in the eyes of the court, because you're guilty and admitted you're guilty, then you were knowingly participating in the very activity that you're now wanting to go back and proclaim I wasn't part of.
[25:43.000 --> 25:46.000]  Okay. Thank you. Appreciate it.
[25:46.000 --> 25:50.000]  Okay. No problem. Thanks for calling in, Joe. Appreciate it.
[25:50.000 --> 25:57.000]  All right. Now, we are going to go to Clint in Texas. Clint, what can we do for you?
[25:57.000 --> 26:02.000]  Yeah, how are you doing? I'm calling about Karen Barnes.
[26:02.000 --> 26:03.000]  Uh-huh.
[26:03.000 --> 26:14.000]  I was invited by a mutual friend of ours to go up there recently, and we went up there on Christmas Eve.
[26:14.000 --> 26:31.000]  And when I met her, she, let me just say, she seemed completely, perfectly fine, normal, healthy, nothing's wrong with her mind.
[26:31.000 --> 26:43.000]  In fact, she was, she's brilliant. She was coming up with things left and right as far as how to code and was completely coherent.
[26:43.000 --> 26:49.000]  We, I didn't say anything for a long time. I didn't say anything about it at all. I didn't want to bring it to her attention.
[26:49.000 --> 27:12.000]  But I noticed there's something with her speech, and she later stated that because of the, she's recently, she's been given four shots that state that the staff who was giving her the shot
[27:12.000 --> 27:18.000]  takes the shot and they need all the way down to her bone. She's been giving that on four different occasions.
[27:18.000 --> 27:34.000]  The fourth being a day before I arrived. So her mouth was extremely dry, and I could, you could just, a person could discern it from her speech.
[27:34.000 --> 27:44.000]  Did they, does she, is she given any particular reason why this medication is being applied to her against her will?
[27:44.000 --> 27:49.000]  Are they telling her anything at all? Are they just jumping on her and injecting her with this stuff?
[27:49.000 --> 28:06.000]  There is, let me, let me check my notes. There is one, I think, I believe this is the drug that they describe, it's used for the administrative purposes to answer the question of, does this person have to be restrained?
[28:06.000 --> 28:18.000]  And this is the, the drug that they use, I believe, under that purpose, supposed purpose.
[28:18.000 --> 28:21.000]  Is she in restraints?
[28:21.000 --> 28:24.000]  No. When I, when I was,
[28:24.000 --> 28:31.000]  And do they have any documented instances of when she's had to be restrained?
[28:31.000 --> 28:44.000]  I don't know. Going off, I believe those four instances, those four times where those, those shots had been given, I believe those four times would have been, be four times she had to have been restrained,
[28:44.000 --> 28:48.000]  supposedly.
[28:48.000 --> 28:54.000]  I don't know, sounds kind of odd, they'd give her one the day before she's expecting, expecting visitors.
[28:54.000 --> 29:08.000]  I wouldn't, there's nothing to read into that, we didn't, as far as I can call in, they didn't know I was coming, and I strongly believe the person I was with also did not set up an appointment with them, so,
[29:08.000 --> 29:13.000]  I strongly believe they had no idea that we were coming to visit.
[29:13.000 --> 29:28.000]  She filed five habeas corpuses, the latest one, I don't know if it's the latest one, but one of them being with the Willbarger County, that's where, that's the, she's in Vernon, Texas, actually just right in town, believe it or not,
[29:28.000 --> 29:42.000]  Vernon, Texas, County's Willbarger County, he filed a habeas corpus with Willbarger, Willbarger County probate court, and it hasn't written any word on any of those habeas corpuses.
[29:42.000 --> 29:45.000]  Okay, hang on a second Clint, we're about to go to break.
[29:45.000 --> 29:56.000]  Alright folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, call in number is 512-646-1984, bear it with Steve there on the board also, hang on, we'll get you on the other side of the break.
[29:56.000 --> 30:00.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, you'll be right back.
[30:00.000 --> 30:05.000]  This is Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[30:05.000 --> 30:07.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:07.000 --> 30:12.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:12.000 --> 30:15.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:15.000 --> 30:18.000]  Thousands of my fellow force respondents are dying.
[30:18.000 --> 30:19.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:19.000 --> 30:20.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:20.000 --> 30:22.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[30:22.000 --> 30:23.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:23.000 --> 30:24.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:24.000 --> 30:27.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[30:27.000 --> 30:30.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:30.000 --> 30:40.000]  Seafood lovers, beware, a new undercover investigation has found that half of Massachusetts seafood is misleadingly labeled as a more expensive variety.
[30:40.000 --> 30:45.000]  I've got your account for an Albright and I'll be back with details on this fishy business.
[30:45.000 --> 30:47.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:47.000 --> 30:50.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:50.000 --> 30:55.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:55.000 --> 31:00.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[31:00.000 --> 31:03.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[31:03.000 --> 31:11.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[31:11.000 --> 31:14.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[31:14.000 --> 31:18.000]  New Englanders will tell you fresh cod is a delicacy worth paying for.
[31:18.000 --> 31:24.000]  Problem is, your chances of actually getting the cod you order is no better than 50-50 these days.
[31:24.000 --> 31:32.000]  According to an investigation by the Boston Globe, nearly half of all seafood sold in Massachusetts is wrongly labeled as a more expensive variety.
[31:32.000 --> 31:34.000]  The riskiest order was tuna.
[31:34.000 --> 31:41.000]  Every sample tested was in fact a cheaper variety, in most cases Escalar, which can cause stomach upset.
[31:41.000 --> 31:49.000]  Other common replacements include tilapia for red snapper, catfish masquerading as grouper, and farmeries salmon labeled as wild.
[31:49.000 --> 31:52.000]  Sadly, seafood has become fishy business.
[31:52.000 --> 31:57.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:02.000 --> 32:14.000]  Yeah, I got that one rent, and I'm going to solve them, to the government them, prosecute them.
[32:14.000 --> 32:15.000]  Okay.
[32:18.000 --> 32:19.000]  What was that?
[32:19.000 --> 32:22.000]  Hi, folks. We are back.
[32:22.000 --> 32:24.000]  This is Blue Lawn Radio.
[32:24.000 --> 32:29.000]  I am your host, Eddie Craig, Debra Stevens, and Randy Gelfin.
[32:29.000 --> 32:31.000]  Are also with us.
[32:31.000 --> 32:34.000]  Well, not with us, but, you know.
[32:34.000 --> 32:37.000]  Now, we are still taking your calls.
[32:37.000 --> 32:39.000]  We are talking to Clint.
[32:39.000 --> 32:43.000]  He is giving us an update on his visit with Carolyn Barnes.
[32:43.000 --> 32:45.000]  All right, Clint, go ahead.
[32:45.000 --> 32:48.000]  Okay, Eddie, I got a couple points I'm going to go through real quick.
[32:48.000 --> 32:51.000]  I believe this answers maybe the question well.
[32:51.000 --> 32:53.000]  I believe the hospital.
[32:53.000 --> 32:57.000]  This is the North Texas State Hospital, Karen Barnes.
[32:57.000 --> 33:04.000]  I believe they're giving her, it's called, schizoaffective disorder.
[33:04.000 --> 33:09.000]  A couple of things she talked about was the people there, the patients, they have swollen bellies.
[33:09.000 --> 33:11.000]  That's from the drug.
[33:11.000 --> 33:14.000]  The side effects are called constipation.
[33:14.000 --> 33:19.000]  She was told before she came in, there was a young woman.
[33:19.000 --> 33:27.000]  Her bowels ruptured, and this young woman was actually, she actually died from that.
[33:27.000 --> 33:32.000]  Again, she was told that she wouldn't see that when she was there.
[33:32.000 --> 33:34.000]  They have a phrase that the staff uses.
[33:34.000 --> 33:39.000]  It's called, drool a patient, she told us about.
[33:39.000 --> 33:45.000]  Carolyn, she's been attacked by, she hasn't provoked anybody.
[33:45.000 --> 33:47.000]  She's been attacked by patients.
[33:47.000 --> 33:56.000]  Her hair has been pulled, she's been kicked in the face.
[33:56.000 --> 34:02.000]  She says that young adults are the day-to-day staff handling the patients.
[34:02.000 --> 34:06.000]  She says there's a low education requirement for that staff.
[34:06.000 --> 34:13.000]  Two patients, a black male and a black female, are being used by the staff as enforcers
[34:13.000 --> 34:29.000]  and paid with prohibited items such as a pizza, a cigarette, things like that.
[34:29.000 --> 34:34.000]  Yeah, I'm trying to go through my notes here.
[34:34.000 --> 34:39.000]  She says that she's spoken with the patients, the patients that she's spoken with,
[34:39.000 --> 34:45.000]  they believe that the drugs that they're being given actually make them more edgy,
[34:45.000 --> 34:50.000]  as opposed to common anyone.
[34:50.000 --> 34:59.000]  She states that the, Carolyn stated that the North Texas State Hospital is controlled by the district attorney
[34:59.000 --> 35:05.000]  and that's what district, I'm sure it's the one that's right there in the area.
[35:05.000 --> 35:13.000]  The only activity as far as classes, therapy classes, is watching television, she says.
[35:13.000 --> 35:18.000]  Everything is drug-based, there's no therapy there.
[35:18.000 --> 35:20.000]  That sounds about right.
[35:20.000 --> 35:26.000]  They can't keep you in the system if they were actually curing you of anything.
[35:26.000 --> 35:31.000]  Let's see, I'm going to make an attempt to contact Jim Smith.
[35:31.000 --> 35:35.000]  It's actually a professional name is James E. Smith.
[35:35.000 --> 35:40.000]  He's the superintendent of the North Texas State Hospital.
[35:40.000 --> 35:47.000]  I'm trying to send him a letter, try to get Carolyn, she wrote, she thinks between,
[35:47.000 --> 35:55.000]  well, she wrote him some letters and she said that that would be a good source for me to get some information on the case.
[35:55.000 --> 36:01.000]  So I'm going to try to get those letters from the superintendent there at that state hospital.
[36:01.000 --> 36:07.000]  Carolyn believes she has a post-traumatic stress disorder, possibly depression.
[36:07.000 --> 36:13.000]  When I was speaking with her, she has a strong spirit, she's a Christian woman, she's reading the Bible.
[36:13.000 --> 36:23.000]  She's also reading another book she has, I forgot what it's called, but they've taken away the things that she's enjoyed.
[36:23.000 --> 36:28.000]  I forgot the date, September, they took away her journal.
[36:28.000 --> 36:33.000]  She was trying to learn Spanish while she was in there and they took away her Spanish.
[36:33.000 --> 36:41.000]  She states that the method that they use is they ask you, what are you enjoying,
[36:41.000 --> 36:50.000]  what things do you like doing here and then they target those things that people enjoy doing as a form of control.
[36:50.000 --> 36:55.000]  It sounds about right also.
[36:55.000 --> 36:57.000]  Anything else?
[36:57.000 --> 37:05.000]  Yeah, I got quite a bit, but I can always call back, you know, when I call again or have someone else,
[37:05.000 --> 37:10.000]  the man that was with me, calling possibly next time, you know, just trying to keep the news going about her.
[37:10.000 --> 37:14.000]  Okay, well, that'll be fine. We appreciate that. Please keep us updated.
[37:14.000 --> 37:18.000]  All right, we'll do. Appreciate the show.
[37:18.000 --> 37:22.000]  All right, thanks, Clint.
[37:22.000 --> 37:27.000]  Okay, John, I see you there as well. We're going to go ahead and take Barrett.
[37:27.000 --> 37:30.000]  Then we'll get to John. Barrett, what can I do for you?
[37:30.000 --> 37:42.000]  Hi, I moved into, well, we moved into a place last April and the rent is $600 a month. The deposit was $600.
[37:42.000 --> 37:54.000]  We've been paying the $600. We missed one month. You know, the jobs, they start and they stop, you know, and so forth.
[37:54.000 --> 38:00.000]  There's no lease at all. There's no contract. It's a month per month, but there's nothing in writing.
[38:00.000 --> 38:08.000]  And every time we pay them, he's either come over here in person and got cash,
[38:08.000 --> 38:14.000]  or we walked down to where his bank is and put it in Wells Fargo.
[38:14.000 --> 38:22.000]  And there were times where he would call us, but we didn't put any money into his account and say, hey, was that you guys,
[38:22.000 --> 38:27.000]  or did you guys just put $300 in my account? And we're like, no.
[38:27.000 --> 38:35.000]  And anyway, we found out that he's not keeping any records. He's just going by memory.
[38:35.000 --> 38:42.000]  And we got an envelope on our door. It was mailed. It wasn't like certified. That's not certified, right?
[38:42.000 --> 38:50.000]  Okay. So it wasn't certified. We didn't have to sign for it. We opened it up and there was nothing in it except for it just says,
[38:50.000 --> 39:05.000]  total $18.90, 30 days notice. I wish you a Merry Christmas. But how about rent? $12.90. Rent passed due 600 deposit,
[39:05.000 --> 39:12.000]  but we paid $200 on the deposit because I mowed the lawn all summer here and it's got a big yard.
[39:12.000 --> 39:21.000]  And he didn't count that. And he forgot all about it. And he said, well, we're like, don't you keep records?
[39:21.000 --> 39:30.000]  He has like a little notepad. So I don't know, can you kick us? I mean, we got this like three days ago.
[39:30.000 --> 39:36.000]  Barrett, what records did you key to prove you paid?
[39:36.000 --> 39:47.000]  We have the receipt from the bank. Well, it's Fargo that we paid. And we have two witnesses saw us giving money.
[39:47.000 --> 39:54.000]  But, you know, it's been like half giving them cash and half going down to his bank. Yeah.
[39:54.000 --> 40:01.000]  And he usually flies out of the area altogether during the winter to go.
[40:01.000 --> 40:11.000]  So anyways, I don't know what can he really do? This is a month for months. There's no contract. There's no, nothing, no lease.
[40:11.000 --> 40:18.000]  So I don't know. I mean, can he actually have a sheriff or somebody come out and say we got to get out?
[40:18.000 --> 40:27.000]  He has to do the proper process for eviction. Well, let me put that. But then again, you need to know what that process is in Idaho too.
[40:27.000 --> 40:37.000]  Roger. Okay. So I just call like legal aid or something. I know that's one thing they deal with, but what would you recommend?
[40:37.000 --> 40:48.000]  You can call them and find out. But what's wrong with reading? Hello?
[40:48.000 --> 41:02.000]  I'll just look it up on the Internet. Okay. You need to read what the deal is with the rights of leaseholders and evictions and so on and so forth.
[41:02.000 --> 41:10.000]  You need to know what's going on. Well, he's saying that we owe.
[41:10.000 --> 41:20.000]  I know what he's saying. That is not what I'm talking about. I'm not talking about reading what he's giving you. Go read the dad gum law. That's what it's for.
[41:20.000 --> 41:31.000]  Okay. Okay. When he gives you notice under the law, what constitutes proper notice? You don't know. You haven't read the law.
[41:31.000 --> 41:42.000]  You don't know whether what he put on your door is sufficient or not. You're not keeping any receipts, which is a major mistake.
[41:42.000 --> 41:48.000]  When he takes money from you, get him to write you a receipt for it.
[41:48.000 --> 41:55.000]  Okay. Of the times that we didn't cast, it's just that's not necessary. I'm keeping records.
[41:55.000 --> 42:08.000]  Yeah. Well, he told her he didn't have time one time. Okay. Again, come back when you have time and I will give you the money. No receipt, no money.
[42:08.000 --> 42:14.000]  Okay. But what do we do now? I mean, this isn't really official. Start reading.
[42:14.000 --> 42:25.000]  Yeah, you're already, never mind. I'm sorry. You need to know what the heck is going on. There's nothing I can tell you till you do that.
[42:25.000 --> 42:30.000]  Okay. Thank you very much. You're welcome.
[42:30.000 --> 42:36.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to John in Texas. Ian and John, what can we do for you?
[42:36.000 --> 42:45.000]  Hi there. Thanks for taking my call. I'm wondering what course of action I can or should or maybe not.
[42:45.000 --> 42:58.000]  Again, I got arrested the weekend before Thanksgiving at East Lake Camping with some friends. I was arrested for not signing the ticket.
[42:58.000 --> 43:04.000]  What was the ticket for? Public consumption of alcohol in the State Park.
[43:04.000 --> 43:14.000]  Okay. What I think he probably should have added was inside of a tent. I don't know if that is neither here nor there, but I'm wondering.
[43:14.000 --> 43:23.000]  I've talked to the judge. He suggested just plead not guilty. I'm going to talk to the county attorney February 1st.
[43:23.000 --> 43:35.000]  And then at that point, it's either plead guilty or not guilty, or take it to trial. Is it worth taking to trial at this point?
[43:35.000 --> 43:40.000]  Okay. Hang on just a second, John. We're going to go to break and we'll finish that question on the other side. Okay?
[43:40.000 --> 43:42.000]  All right. Thank you.
[43:42.000 --> 43:53.000]  All right, folks. John's my last caller. Calling number is 512-646-1984. Give me a call. Don't leave me hanging. Give me something good to do. I'm just going to have to read to you.
[43:53.000 --> 44:16.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio. We'll be right back after the break.
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  The judges have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:56.000]  We will receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[44:56.000 --> 45:01.000]  Our call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:09.000]  The Oklahoma City bombing. Top 10 reasons to question the official story. Reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices.
[45:09.000 --> 45:16.000]  On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the Ryder truck report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators.
[45:16.000 --> 45:24.000]  The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone delivered the Ryder truck bomb to the Murra Building and detonated it.
[45:24.000 --> 45:32.000]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley, who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing,
[45:32.000 --> 45:39.000]  testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fable John Doe number two, exiting the Ryder truck.
[45:39.000 --> 45:50.000]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing, no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing,
[45:50.000 --> 45:57.000]  including when he rented the Ryder truck, and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:57.000 --> 46:02.000]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:27.000 --> 46:34.000]  Right now I am taking your calls. The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[46:34.000 --> 46:40.000]  Right now we are talking to John, who is my last caller by the way, so come on folks, give me a call.
[46:40.000 --> 46:44.000]  Alright John, let's go ahead and finish that up.
[46:44.000 --> 46:52.000]  Now, consumption of alcohol in a state park, public consumption of alcohol in a state park, correct?
[46:52.000 --> 46:53.000]  Yes.
[46:53.000 --> 46:55.000]  Have you looked the statute up?
[46:55.000 --> 46:57.000]  Not, where would I find something like that?
[46:57.000 --> 47:01.000]  Well, I'm assuming a Parks and Wildlife Ranger wrote this?
[47:01.000 --> 47:02.000]  Yes.
[47:02.000 --> 47:05.000]  I would look in the Parks and Wildlife Code first.
[47:05.000 --> 47:11.000]  Okay, I have a pamphlet that he gave that I was given.
[47:11.000 --> 47:14.000]  A pamphlet is not the law.
[47:14.000 --> 47:15.000]  Okay, okay.
[47:15.000 --> 47:19.000]  And those pamphlets will almost always misstate what the law actually says.
[47:19.000 --> 47:21.000]  Right.
[47:21.000 --> 47:26.000]  So I would go to Parks and Rec of Texas and...
[47:26.000 --> 47:31.000]  Yeah, go online to the Texas government website and look at the Parks and Recreation Code
[47:31.000 --> 47:37.000]  and then do a word search using at least some of the terms out of the description of the offense
[47:37.000 --> 47:39.000]  and see if you can locate it.
[47:39.000 --> 47:44.000]  I would start with consumption or alcohol.
[47:44.000 --> 47:52.000]  And I'm wondering, will I find something that is stating if you're out in the open?
[47:52.000 --> 47:54.000]  I have no idea what you're finding.
[47:54.000 --> 47:58.000]  I haven't looked for that particular statute regarding that particular activity.
[47:58.000 --> 47:59.000]  Okay.
[47:59.000 --> 48:02.000]  But feel free to send me a reference to whatever you find.
[48:02.000 --> 48:04.000]  I'll be more than happy to look at it and go over it with you.
[48:04.000 --> 48:05.000]  Okay.
[48:05.000 --> 48:07.000]  Very good.
[48:07.000 --> 48:10.000]  I apologize if this was not on topic of traffic.
[48:10.000 --> 48:11.000]  No, not a problem.
[48:11.000 --> 48:16.000]  Citations in general are always on topic mainly because they're almost always wrong.
[48:16.000 --> 48:20.000]  Now, there is one other thing you need to look at on this citation.
[48:20.000 --> 48:21.000]  Yeah.
[48:21.000 --> 48:31.000]  Somewhere on there, you're going to find a statement that should contain the following.
[48:31.000 --> 48:35.000]  A conviction of an offense under a traffic law.
[48:35.000 --> 48:40.000]  The Parks and Wildlife is supposed to use the same standard citation everybody else is using.
[48:40.000 --> 48:52.000]  Like, I was arrested and I got the ticket that he was writing out and I was arrested for not signing the ticket.
[48:52.000 --> 48:53.000]  Okay.
[48:53.000 --> 49:00.000]  Again, we need to see whether or not the power to arrest was ever conveyed to the Parks and Wildlife folks,
[49:00.000 --> 49:02.000]  and that again will be in the statute.
[49:02.000 --> 49:07.000]  Whether or not he can arrest on that charge will be in the statute.
[49:07.000 --> 49:08.000]  Ah.
[49:08.000 --> 49:22.000]  Now, the question is, does the citation somewhere on the front, back, or something have a notice of potential surcharge statement?
[49:22.000 --> 49:24.000]  Wow.
[49:24.000 --> 49:32.000]  The statement will say a conviction of an offense under a traffic law of this state or a political subdivision of this state.
[49:32.000 --> 49:35.000]  Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
[49:35.000 --> 49:39.000]  Wow. On the citation, a little blue piece of paper that I have?
[49:39.000 --> 49:40.000]  Yeah.
[49:40.000 --> 49:45.000]  Front or back somewhere should be that statement.
[49:45.000 --> 49:51.000]  The law is enforced by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department of Design to conserve and protect wildlife and aquatic resources.
[49:51.000 --> 49:53.000]  That's probably not it.
[49:53.000 --> 50:02.000]  Failure to pay a civil restitution or a resultant denial or hunting and fishing privileges.
[50:02.000 --> 50:06.000]  I'm not sure where I would see that.
[50:06.000 --> 50:13.000]  Well, then scan in the front and back of that and every other piece of paper you were given and sent to me.
[50:13.000 --> 50:19.000]  And while you're on the website looking up the Parks and Wildlife stuff,
[50:19.000 --> 50:30.000]  also look in the Texas Transportation Code at section 708.105 and see what you can see there.
[50:30.000 --> 50:36.000]  And I was, according to that, every citation in the state of Texas is supposed to have that statement on it.
[50:36.000 --> 50:39.000]  It doesn't matter who issues it.
[50:39.000 --> 50:43.000]  And a statement of what? What exactly should it be stating?
[50:43.000 --> 50:49.000]  The statement is in 708.105 that's supposed to appear on the ticket.
[50:49.000 --> 50:54.000]  If it's not there, then the ticket's invalid as a matter of law.
[50:54.000 --> 50:59.000]  Wow.
[50:59.000 --> 51:03.000]  I definitely don't see, should it say, 708.105?
[51:03.000 --> 51:09.000]  Oh, it won't say that on the ticket, it will just have the statement.
[51:09.000 --> 51:13.000]  Yeah, there's definitely no statement on this thing, on the ticket itself.
[51:13.000 --> 51:21.000]  I also have a letter from the magistrate from the next morning that she gave me,
[51:21.000 --> 51:31.000]  which I've been read my rights at the time of the arrest or the next morning at 9.05 when the magistrate came in.
[51:31.000 --> 51:35.000]  It doesn't matter if you're arrested.
[51:35.000 --> 51:39.000]  Well, they were supposed to do a 15-17 hearing if you were arrested,
[51:39.000 --> 51:46.000]  and you showed up in compliance with the citation or if you were arrested without a warrant.
[51:46.000 --> 51:53.000]  The law is very clear on that, and if they didn't do that, did he take you to jail or did he take you to the magistrate?
[51:53.000 --> 52:02.000]  He took me to jail at about midnight, and then it was the next morning at 9.05 when the magistrate came in.
[52:02.000 --> 52:05.000]  Yeah, and that game warden is in real deep duty.
[52:05.000 --> 52:07.000]  Really?
[52:07.000 --> 52:18.000]  Because he is required to act with due diligence to take you before a magistrate having jurisdiction of the offense, time of day, is irrelevant.
[52:18.000 --> 52:21.000]  Wow.
[52:21.000 --> 52:32.000]  Because he's the one who asked me to put the cuffs on me, but it was actually, I think, I don't know if it was the sheriff or somebody else came in and brought me actually to the facility.
[52:32.000 --> 52:37.000]  It doesn't make any difference. Whoever had you had the responsibility.
[52:37.000 --> 52:39.000]  Okay.
[52:39.000 --> 52:49.000]  Um, and I was, uh, well, uh, tended to just, uh, wow.
[52:49.000 --> 52:58.000]  Okay, what allegedly, is that what the citation charges you with, consumption of alcohol in a public park?
[52:58.000 --> 53:08.000]  Yes, that's, that's what the violation description is on, on violation one.
[53:08.000 --> 53:23.000]  Okay. Well, the only place I can find a reference to the word alcohol is in section 31.178 of the Parks and Wildlife Code drug and alcohol testing.
[53:23.000 --> 53:29.000]  And it deals with a party and a boat involved in an accident.
[53:29.000 --> 53:35.000]  Yeah, word alcohol does not appear in any other part of the Parks and Wildlife Code whatsoever.
[53:35.000 --> 53:41.000]  So what law is he allegedly charging you under?
[53:41.000 --> 53:45.000]  Because it's not in the Parks and Wildlife Code.
[53:45.000 --> 53:49.000]  Wow.
[53:49.000 --> 53:55.000]  So I guess it sounds like I've got a lot of homework to do, but I have no idea where to even start.
[53:55.000 --> 54:00.000]  Well, the other place you need to be looking at is the penal code.
[54:00.000 --> 54:11.000]  The penal code is going to be the only other place where they could have an alcohol related offense related to parks to a park.
[54:11.000 --> 54:16.000]  That's the only place they could have it, which would be chapter 49.
[54:16.000 --> 54:23.000]  Here's something. I was given the Rules and Regulations State Parks Division.
[54:23.000 --> 54:27.000]  The rules and regulations are not laws.
[54:27.000 --> 54:37.000]  So rules of conduct in a park, Part B, alcohol beverages, it is an offense for any person to consume or display an alcoholic beverage in a public place or alcoholic beverages within it.
[54:37.000 --> 54:41.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Say that again.
[54:41.000 --> 54:47.000]  This is Part B of 59.134 Rules of Conduct in Parks.
[54:47.000 --> 55:03.000]  It says alcoholic beverages, it is an offense for any person to consume or display an alcoholic beverage in a public place or sell alcoholic beverages within the State Park.
[55:03.000 --> 55:09.000]  Okay. Where is public place defined in those regulations?
[55:09.000 --> 55:20.000]  It's not. I'm pretty sure. It's not in this, you know, a large piece of paper with three folds.
[55:20.000 --> 55:23.000]  So it's kind of like a little brochure for a State Park.
[55:23.000 --> 55:29.000]  Okay. Again, that's not a law. What law are they basing this on?
[55:29.000 --> 55:37.000]  Because I'm looking now in the penal code and I can't find a reference to public park anywhere.
[55:37.000 --> 55:51.000]  Wow. So is he trying to enforce a rule? That's not a law and that's, I mean, would that have been kidnapping?
[55:51.000 --> 55:55.000]  Well, that would appear to be the case because let's see.
[55:55.000 --> 56:11.000]  The only offense involving alcohol in the Parks and Wildlife Code is 31.097, which is operating a watercraft while intoxicated, which in a tent in the park, I would presume you're not doing?
[56:11.000 --> 56:13.000]  No. I was going to tell you.
[56:13.000 --> 56:20.000]  Yeah. That's the only reference to park that's in the penal code under alcoholic beverage offenses.
[56:20.000 --> 56:26.000]  So what law are they allegedly basing this ticket on?
[56:26.000 --> 56:35.000]  I would demand a dismissal. I would file a motion to quash the citation and the complaint as there is no issue before the court.
[56:35.000 --> 56:40.000]  There is no statement of an offense involving any state law. None.
[56:40.000 --> 56:43.000]  Wow. Awesome.
[56:43.000 --> 56:55.000]  And then I would sue the Parks and Wildlife guy for aggravated assault, aggravated kidnapping, and whoever transported you from there to jail with the same.
[56:55.000 --> 56:58.000]  Really?
[56:58.000 --> 57:09.000]  I would sue him under Title 42, Section 1983, United States Code, in federal court, till I owned their boat and their house and their car.
[57:09.000 --> 57:16.000]  I imagine you'd probably have to have some large funds to even go through a process like that, I imagine.
[57:16.000 --> 57:25.000]  Probably if you do it all yourself, maximum would probably be about five to seven grand total, but that's all filing fees and all this other kind of stuff.
[57:25.000 --> 57:28.000]  It's not having to pay a lawyer because you're doing it yourself.
[57:28.000 --> 57:30.000]  And what would that...
[57:30.000 --> 57:33.000]  And it's not all due at once. It'll be over time.
[57:33.000 --> 57:34.000]  Right.
[57:34.000 --> 57:39.000]  But it's like a $346 filing fee to start the suit and get it going.
[57:39.000 --> 57:42.000]  Right. And what would be the...
[57:42.000 --> 57:48.000]  What would I be getting out of that, or what would be the ultimate...
[57:48.000 --> 57:53.000]  I would sue for a million bucks for every hour I was in jail.
[57:53.000 --> 58:05.000]  I would sue for punitive damages of $500,000 for every crime, for every felony committed, which was at least those two.
[58:05.000 --> 58:12.000]  And then you've got abuse of official capacity and official oppression, which official oppression is now a felony.
[58:12.000 --> 58:17.000]  So that's $1.5 million for those three acts.
[58:17.000 --> 58:22.000]  And then another $250,000 for every misdemeanor.
[58:22.000 --> 58:27.000]  Is it possible for me to sit down with you sometime before February 1st and go over some things?
[58:27.000 --> 58:31.000]  Sure. Just give me an email and send me your contact information.
[58:31.000 --> 58:33.000]  I'll be happy to do that, okay?
[58:33.000 --> 58:34.000]  Okay.
[58:34.000 --> 58:35.000]  All right.
[58:35.000 --> 58:37.000]  How do I do that?
[58:37.000 --> 58:44.000]  Just send me an email at edddieatruleoflawradio.com.
[58:44.000 --> 58:48.000]  Edddieatradio.com.
[58:48.000 --> 58:51.000]  No, at ruleoflawradio.com.
[58:51.000 --> 58:53.000]  All right.
[58:53.000 --> 58:55.000]  All right, folks, we're about to go to break.
[58:55.000 --> 58:56.000]  This is ruleoflawradio.
[58:56.000 --> 58:57.000]  We'll be right back.
[58:57.000 --> 58:58.000]  John, hang on.
[58:58.000 --> 59:00.000]  I'll finish up when we get back to you.
[59:00.000 --> 59:03.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[59:03.000 --> 59:10.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:10.000 --> 59:15.000]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:15.000 --> 59:22.000]  It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:22.000 --> 59:27.000]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:27.000 --> 59:37.000]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church.
[59:37.000 --> 59:50.000]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102.
[59:50.000 --> 59:54.000]  That's 888-551-0102.
[59:54.000 --> 59:59.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:59.000 --> 01:00:07.000]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:37.000]  Syrian authorities said Friday at least 30 people, mostly civilians, were killed by two suicide car bombs in Damascus.
[01:00:37.000 --> 01:00:47.000]  The claim came ahead of calls by anti-government activists for fresh protests across the country, and one day after Arab League peace monitors arrived in the country.
[01:00:47.000 --> 01:00:53.000]  Syria has portrayed the nine-month uprising as the work of terrorists and armed gangs.
[01:00:53.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  Thousands of protesters in Yemen began marching from the city of Taiz to the capital, Sana'a, Wednesday, demanding President Ali Abdullah Saleh stand trial.
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:11.000]  In a deal brokered by Yemen's regional allies, Saleh has agreed to hand over power, but in return he has been granted immunity from prosecution.
[01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  March has once Ali prosecuted for his involvement in the crackdown on anti-government protesters.
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:26.000]  House Speaker John Boehner Thursday capitulated and they showdown over the payroll tax after days of criticism from fellow Republicans.
[01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:34.000]  About 160 million Americans will now receive their tax breaks, worth an average of $20 a week in January and February.
[01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:39.000]  Another 1.3 million will continue to receive unemployment checks for the next two months.
[01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  The bill was passed by the Senate Saturday with the backing of both Republicans and Democrats.
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:51.000]  Boehner, having initially agreed to back the bill, retreated on Sunday, faced with opposition from the Tea Party.
[01:01:51.000 --> 01:02:01.000]  The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Thursday declined to hear an appeal from Entergy, owner of Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant.
[01:02:01.000 --> 01:02:11.000]  As it sought to overturn the commission's requirement, the company's supply in environmental and accident safety review as part of its license renewal application.
[01:02:11.000 --> 01:02:19.000]  Indian Point, located less than 25 miles from New York, has been granted more than 100 health and safety exemptions from the NRC.
[01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:29.000]  New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman contended Entergy's quote, accident mitigation alternatives were severely lacking and had to be bolstered
[01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:33.000]  if it wanted the nuclear plant to get a new license in 2013.
[01:02:33.000 --> 01:02:41.000]  Following the nuclear meltdowns at Fukushima, the NRC advised U.S. citizens not to go within 50 miles of the Japanese plant,
[01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:45.000]  yet Entergy's evacuation plan extends just 10 miles from the plant.
[01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:51.000]  If a Fukushima scale meltdown occurred at Indian Point, New York would be uninhabitable.
[01:02:51.000 --> 01:02:58.000]  For details on this story, visit INS.org. Next.
[01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:27.000]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty.
[01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:33.000]  I read his book and it says, care for the people of the United States.
[01:03:33.000 --> 01:03:36.000]  I am your host, Andy Craig.
[01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:42.000]  This is the Monday Night Traffic Show, but we are meeting with several things involving the citation of the moment.
[01:03:42.000 --> 01:03:46.000]  We're going to finish up with John, getting some information starting here real quick.
[01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:51.000]  John, is this low park that you were in designated as public hunting land?
[01:03:51.000 --> 01:03:56.000]  I think it might. I'm not certain. It's Inks Lake in Burnett County.
[01:03:56.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  Spell that.
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  I-N-K-S Lake.
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:05.000]  Inks Lake in Burnett County.
[01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:06.000]  Yeah.
[01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:08.000]  Okay.
[01:04:08.000 --> 01:04:11.000]  And you say it's a park?
[01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  Texas State Park, yes.
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:17.000]  Okay.
[01:04:17.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  All right. You got the email address to contact me on?
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  Eddie at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:28.000]  Correct.
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:32.000]  So just scan in the citation and everything. Send me a copy of that.
[01:04:32.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  And we'll start looking up this other stuff to see what's what.
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:39.000]  Wow, awesome.
[01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:42.000]  Cool. I appreciate your patience and help.
[01:04:42.000 --> 01:04:44.000]  Yes, sir. Not a problem.
[01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:49.000]  Cool. Very well.
[01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:50.000]  Thanks again.
[01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:54.000]  You're welcome. Thanks for calling in.
[01:04:54.000 --> 01:04:58.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Walt in New York.
[01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  Walt, what can we do for you?
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:01.000]  Yeah. Hi, Eddie.
[01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  Eddie, first thing, I got a couple of three questions, quick ones.
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:08.000]  First question I want to ask is, what needs to be done?
[01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:13.000]  I lived in Rochester, New York, Webster, Buffalo, Syracuse area.
[01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:18.000]  What needs to be done to get your radio show up here at one of the stations up here in this area?
[01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  That's my first question.
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:24.000]  Well, as far as one of the stations where we're streamed on the internet,
[01:05:24.000 --> 01:05:33.000]  what someone there needs is a micro broadcasting station where they can take the internet feed and broadcast it out over a radio tower.
[01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:40.000]  Or you need to get somebody in one of the major radio stations to pick up our stream and pipe it out.
[01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:43.000]  How would you get them to do that?
[01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:45.000]  I would try asking them.
[01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  Okay, because I know one of them.
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  Kissing them, whatever.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:49.000]  I know this one.
[01:05:49.000 --> 01:05:51.000]  Well, I can't tell you what their interest would be.
[01:05:51.000 --> 01:05:53.000]  Most radio stations are for-profit businesses.
[01:05:53.000 --> 01:06:00.000]  Unless they're generating a profit from it, they're not going to carry it because it eats into their profiteering mode.
[01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:04.000]  Okay, I got two other quick questions for you.
[01:06:04.000 --> 01:06:08.000]  Way back in March, I spoke to you about this issue.
[01:06:08.000 --> 01:06:11.000]  And Deborah had an answer and I couldn't find it.
[01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  I had a librarian help me on the computer.
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:14.000]  We can't find it.
[01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  It's a code.
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:25.000]  What happened was, if somebody comes up to you, Eddie, and tries to forcibly remove something from your hand against your will,
[01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  I was telling Deborah the story and involved with another issue, but she said that was a type of assault.
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:35.000]  Do you know what that is or what code would it be?
[01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:42.000]  They intentionally tried to harm me, but they tried to forcibly remove something against my will and I resisted.
[01:06:42.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  What would you call that?
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:44.000]  That's my second question.
[01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:45.000]  I got one more after that.
[01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:48.000]  Was this somebody displaying a deadly weapon?
[01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:50.000]  No.
[01:06:50.000 --> 01:06:52.000]  Okay, then it's assault.
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  It's called simple assault.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:59.000]  Eddie, I looked up all this stuff about assault, what I could find in the library.
[01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  And every one of them that I seen, well, I was on the phone with a librarian.
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:05.000]  They looked it up on the computer.
[01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:09.000]  It always had something to say about what the intent to harm somebody.
[01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:12.000]  Now, I don't believe this person had the intent to harm somebody.
[01:07:12.000 --> 01:07:19.000]  Okay, then if they didn't, if the statute specifically requires the intent to commit a harm,
[01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:27.000]  all right, which I'm not sure they do because the New York police are extremely bad about saying
[01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:33.000]  you committed assault upon them just by touching them, even when you have no intention of committing harm to them.
[01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:39.000]  But in any case, I'd have to see the statutes to know what qualifies, Walt.
[01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  Yeah, because I know Deborah, Deborah came up with it immediately.
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:47.000]  Well, here in Texas, it's offensive touching, which is assault.
[01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:48.000]  That's how assault is defined.
[01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  It's called offensive touching.
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:51.000]  That's the code.
[01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  I mean, that's what you call it.
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:55.000]  No, assault is what it's called.
[01:07:55.000 --> 01:08:01.000]  The element is being touched in a manner that one considers offensive.
[01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:04.000]  Okay, I disagree with that interpretation.
[01:08:04.000 --> 01:08:09.000]  Yeah, that may be harassment or a number of other things, but it is not an assault.
[01:08:09.000 --> 01:08:13.000]  Okay, but anyway, that's the way Texas statutes define it.
[01:08:13.000 --> 01:08:19.000]  Okay, that's what you just said about offensive touching. Someone told me about that,
[01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:22.000]  and I got to find out tomorrow more about the look that up more.
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  I think that's what it is.
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:27.000]  It's called assault by touching or something like that.
[01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:29.000]  So thank you very much for that.
[01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:33.000]  But the final thing I want to ask you is about traffic court issues.
[01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:37.000]  This lady I know, she's my barber, and she got in trouble.
[01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  And I told her to call you, and she wouldn't do it.
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:42.000]  And here's what happened.
[01:08:42.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  She's driving, she's traveling in her car, and she was within the speed limit of 30 miles an hour.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  Cop pulls her over, says she was going 45, 47 miles an hour.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:57.000]  She goes, no, I wasn't. I was totally legal.
[01:08:57.000 --> 01:09:00.000]  He says, it looked to me like you were going 45 or 47.
[01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  She goes, what do you mean it looked that way?
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:04.000]  She goes, did you have radar on me?
[01:09:04.000 --> 01:09:06.000]  He goes, no, it looked that way to me.
[01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  So she started arguing about that.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  So then what he does is, he says, okay, what I'm going to do then is,
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:18.000]  I'm going to give you a citation that says that you failed to observe some kind of traffic device.
[01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:26.000]  So she didn't get that thing in the mail that you're supposed to get 24 hours before a criminal,
[01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:29.000]  I forgot what you call it, it's a criminal complaint or something.
[01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:32.000]  She went to court, she pleaded not guilty, she's got to go back to court.
[01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:35.000]  I don't know when, maybe in the next couple, three weeks.
[01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:39.000]  So is there anything you could tell me, I'm taping this call with you Eddie,
[01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:41.000]  because I'm going to forget what you're going to say.
[01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:43.000]  And I'll play it for her.
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:47.000]  And what you can tell her what she needs to do, because I think that's totally illegal.
[01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  First he's going to choose her speeding, then she argues what him denies it,
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:54.000]  so then he's changing the infraction.
[01:09:54.000 --> 01:09:56.000]  That sounds very bad to me.
[01:09:56.000 --> 01:10:04.000]  Can you tell me what you think about that?
[01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:09.000]  I'm not sure I'm following that, Walt.
[01:10:09.000 --> 01:10:15.000]  You're saying they're going to charge her with one thing and then change it to something else?
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:16.000]  No, what they did was...
[01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:17.000]  Did she denies it?
[01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:20.000]  Well, what happened was, when he first pulled her over, right,
[01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:23.000]  he said you were speeding, she denied it.
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:31.000]  And then she said, you didn't even have a radar on you, you're just, you're guesstimating, you're speculating.
[01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:38.000]  So he says, okay, then I'm going to give you a ticket for violating a failure to yield to a traffic device.
[01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:40.000]  And she says, I didn't do that either.
[01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  So first he said she was speeding, he was going to give her a ticket for that.
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:51.000]  Then what she needs is information from his body mic and from the camera and his cruiser.
[01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  That proves she didn't do either of those.
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  Okay, now is her word against his, if he doesn't have any other proof, enough for her to win the case?
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:04.000]  Well, that all depends on what she can present.
[01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  And what the mood of the jury is, you're asking me to look into a crystal ball and tell you the future, Walt.
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  I can't do that.
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:18.000]  Well, because I heard you say something in the past, or Deborah did, that if they don't have any other evidence, just their word, the officer,
[01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:24.000]  that your word overpowers as far as the jury goes.
[01:11:24.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  No, it doesn't overpower anything, it just intends to invoke who the jury's going to believe more.
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:32.000]  Oh, okay.
[01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:35.000]  But isn't that wrong though, at first he's trying to...
[01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:38.000]  Yes, it's wrong, we know that's wrong.
[01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:41.000]  He's just looking for something to write a ticket for.
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:43.000]  All right, what would you call it, Ed?
[01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:48.000]  At first he's falsely accused in her speeding, then he acknowledges it that she wasn't speeding that.
[01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:49.000]  It's fraud, Walt.
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  It's fraud.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:52.000]  So public harassment and it's fraud.
[01:11:52.000 --> 01:11:53.000]  That's what it is.
[01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:56.000]  How will she present that to the judge about that?
[01:11:56.000 --> 01:12:00.000]  She isn't, because that isn't the issue in front of the judge.
[01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:05.000]  She's going to have to sue the cop for it and she's going to have to have evidence to back up her side of it when she does.
[01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:10.000]  Well, she's got to go to court yet in front of a jury, I believe.
[01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:23.000]  Well, again, this comes back to him trying to write her up for a transportation offense. If she's not in transportation, then what's the offense?
[01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  How can she commit a transportation offense if she is not a carrier engaging in transportation?
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:34.000]  Well, that's the problem, Ed. She's not going to fight it based on that kind of...
[01:12:34.000 --> 01:12:39.000]  Well, then I don't know what else to tell you because that's the only way to fight it.
[01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:43.000]  Well, the only thing... I'm just going to say it one more time if I may, Eddie.
[01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  I'm thinking if the cop is falsely accusing you of speeding and he admits it...
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:53.000]  He's not going to admit it, Walt. Who is he going to admit it to?
[01:12:53.000 --> 01:12:58.000]  All she's going to do is testify. He said she said on the side of the road.
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:02.000]  He's not going to get on the stand and admit he did that at all.
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:05.000]  If you think he is, you're not awake.
[01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:09.000]  What about if... Isn't it, like, recorded or anything?
[01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:17.000]  Hence the reason she needs the evidence from either his body mic or the video from his cruiser, which will have the audio also.
[01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:21.000]  Okay. I'll tell her that.
[01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:23.000]  Okay. Well, thank you very much.
[01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:24.000]  You're welcome.
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:25.000]  Thanks a lot.
[01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:27.000]  You too.
[01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:37.000]  All right. Now we go to Wendy in New York. Wendy's going to be our last caller, folks. Give us a call 512-646-1984.
[01:13:37.000 --> 01:13:39.000]  Don't leave me hanging alone out here.
[01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:41.000]  Ian and Wendy, what can we do for you?
[01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:44.000]  Hi. I'm actually Wendy in California.
[01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:47.000]  I'm sorry. Wendy in California. I'm sorry.
[01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:53.000]  This is a toll. I guess a fraudulent toll taken.
[01:13:53.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  I paid the toll going through a bridge only, then I get a notice saying I evaded the toll and I'm supposed to pay him $30 if I want to contest it.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:07.000]  Now, this is the second time this happened.
[01:14:07.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  They can't charge you to contest it.
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:15.000]  To contest that. I did pay it. Yeah, to contest that.
[01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:25.000]  I'm trying to say that I received a notice of toll evasion. So if I want to contest this notice, I have to pay him $30.
[01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:32.000]  No. Can't do that. Sorry. That's not due process. They can't force you to pay and then adjudicate. Doesn't work that way.
[01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:38.000]  Okay. What would you suggest I do? Because this really makes me mad. It's a scam.
[01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:41.000]  Who sent you a notice that says that?
[01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:48.000]  Well, it was actually sent by the, it's called FastTrack. It's an electronic toll system.
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:53.000]  Are they part of the California Highway System or are they some other state?
[01:14:53.000 --> 01:14:57.000]  It's part of California. I'm not sure.
[01:14:57.000 --> 01:15:00.000]  Is it part of the tax and franchise board there in California?
[01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:07.000]  It doesn't really say, but it does list what codes it violated. I violated.
[01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  You allegedly violated.
[01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:18.000]  Allegedly, yeah. It says the California Streets and Highway Code section has a number and then the California Vehicle Code and then a section number for that.
[01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  Saying that tolls must be paid and penalties or fees may be charged if the proper toll is not paid. But I did pay him the $5.
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  This just happened to me a couple of years ago. Every time I've been requesting every seat, but there was one time where I forgot to.
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  And I'm sure this is what it was. Now, the other issue is, I do have an electronic transponder in the window still.
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  However, I move. So I no longer, the battery's dead. It's not working. And I didn't put any money in that account.
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:16:03.000]  So I think they know that. I think that had to do with why it triggered them to do that somehow because it just seems like it's a scam having to do with that.
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:06.000]  Oh, I absolutely agree with you. It's a scam.
[01:16:06.000 --> 01:16:16.000]  Yeah. Is there anything I can, anything I can do, though, to sue them or it's probably not worth it? They must do this a lot.
[01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:23.000]  Well, I'm sure they do. But in this case, I would just, what court are you supposed to appear in?
[01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  It's all by mail. It doesn't even talk about it.
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  Right. Which means it's all in administrative. I would find out who the administrative court is that handles this. And I would send them a notice.
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:43.000]  One, I paid when I work through. Two, I'm not paying you $30 to get my wife to re-judicate this issue.
[01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  It's a bill of attainder or a bill of pains and penalties. And I would challenge it on those grounds specifically.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  Okay. Hey, I'll just take it, Wendy. All right, folks, you're going to break. Call in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:16:56.000 --> 01:17:21.000]  Wendy will pick you up on the other side. We'll be right back.
[01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:33.000]  Voting against every tax increase, every untoward budget, every time.
[01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:42.000]  Standing up to the Washington Machine, guided by Principal Ron Paul, the one who will stop the spending.
[01:17:42.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  Save the dollar, pre-jobs, bring peace, the one who will restore liberty.
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:56.000]  Ron Paul, the one who can beat Obama and restore America now.
[01:17:56.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  I'm Ron Paul, and I approve this message.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  Finally, residential, mobile, and business telephones and plans that are private and never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:38.000]  When a low price, residential and business plans started only $14.99, and mobile plans started just $39.99.
[01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  Plus, every month you pay your bill, freedomtelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs.
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:55.000]  Don't wait. Support the cause and get the highest quality and the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553.
[01:18:55.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  That's 800-600-5553. Freedomtelephones.com. Portable, private, perfect.
[01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:15.000]  I'm Ron Paul, and I approve this message.
[01:19:15.000 --> 01:19:30.000]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Ron Paul Radio. We have about 45 minutes left on this Monday night show. We are taking the calls.
[01:19:30.000 --> 01:19:35.000]  I already number is 512-646-1984. Right now, we are talking to Wendy in California.
[01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:38.000]  I'm trying to get back up on the floor here.
[01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  All right, Wendy, continue, please.
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:50.000]  Yeah, I did notice here what it says. If I want to contest the notice of total evasion, I have to first, you know, sign the back of the form, send it in.
[01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:59.000]  I'll be notified of the investigation results by mail, and then if I'm not satisfied with the results, then I can request an administrative review.
[01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:10.000]  But then it says I still have to deposit the $30, the procedures that are sent forth in California vehicle code sections and have the numbers.
[01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:16.000]  Bill of pains and penalties. Unconstitutional and illegal on its face. Challenge it on those grounds.
[01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:17.000]  Okay, say that again.
[01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  There cannot be a legislative or administrative determination of guilt without a finding of fact by a judicial proceeding.
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:38.000]  That is the very definition of a bill of pains and penalties or a bill of attainder. Every state constitution absolutely forbids them.
[01:20:38.000 --> 01:20:41.000]  And that's exactly what this is.
[01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:42.000]  Okay.
[01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:48.000]  It is a legislative or administrative determination of guilt.
[01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:51.000]  Meaning it has to be in court?
[01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:59.000]  No. Well, okay. A legislative or administrative determination of guilt is exactly what they're telling you you have to do.
[01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:07.000]  You are guilty until you prove you're innocent and you're going to pay the fine before we give you the right to prove you're innocent.
[01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:16.000]  That's a bill of pains and penalties or a bill of attainder. And that's exactly what this is trying to do.
[01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:17.000]  Okay.
[01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:19.000]  Okay.
[01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:21.000]  And that's illegal.
[01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:23.000]  That's absolutely unconstitutional.
[01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:24.000]  Okay.
[01:21:24.000 --> 01:21:28.000]  Which is exactly what makes it illegal.
[01:21:28.000 --> 01:21:31.000]  Okay.
[01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:44.000]  If you go read your state constitution, you're going to find that there are no bills of attainder allowed.
[01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:45.000]  Okay.
[01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:49.000]  So what would you suggest I do?
[01:21:49.000 --> 01:21:51.000]  I would challenge it.
[01:21:51.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  I would send a notice to whomever sent me that with a reply that I challenged this, this alleged anything.
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:10.000]  Whatever you want to call it on the grounds of violation of constitutional article, blah, blah, blah on the prohibition of bills of attainder and bills of pains and penalties.
[01:22:10.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  This is an attempted legislative and or administrative determination of guilt sans judicial review.
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  And it is unconstitutional on its face as is California Motor Vehicle Code section blah, blah, blah and whatever other code they're talking about.
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  Okay.
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:38.000]  Sound fair?
[01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  I think so, yes. Thank you.
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:42.000]  You're very welcome. Good luck.
[01:22:42.000 --> 01:22:44.000]  Okay. Bye-bye.
[01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:50.000]  All right. Now we have Dusty in Texas. Evening Dusty, what can we do for you?
[01:22:50.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  Hey, good evening. Thanks.
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:23:00.000]  I possess a class A combination CDL license with all the endorsements except for passenger.
[01:23:00.000 --> 01:23:03.000]  And I'm a youth pastor.
[01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:07.000]  So what I did is I've taken a side job driving a truck.
[01:23:07.000 --> 01:23:15.000]  And my boss tells me, you know, go down and load up with this, you know, it's a dump truck, load up with that amount of weight.
[01:23:15.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  Okay, no problem. You know, I'm doing what he tells me to do.
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:24.000]  And I get stopped by Williamson County weight and measures.
[01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:26.000]  And they weigh my truck.
[01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:36.000]  And without me knowing very much about it, you know, I, the reason I got the license is, you know, I used to run harvest years ago.
[01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:45.000]  But anyways, I'm not familiar with all the rules and regulations and laws and all that good junk.
[01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:53.000]  And he pulls me over and says, okay, you look like you're overweight. We're going to go ahead and weigh you.
[01:23:53.000 --> 01:24:00.000]  So he weighs me. I drive up on the scales and I'm 12,200 and something pounds overweight.
[01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  So he writes me a ticket.
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:08.000]  Wait a minute. How can you be 12,000 pounds overweight? This is a dump truck.
[01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  It's very much possible. This is a huge truck. It used to be a concrete truck and they put a dump bed on it.
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  It'll hold, you know, 27 to 30 tons of material.
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:27.000]  And I had probably 24 or 25 tons of board.
[01:24:27.000 --> 01:24:32.000]  It's got two drawback schools and a tandem axle in the back.
[01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  So, I mean, it can hold, you know, a pretty good amount of weight.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:39.000]  What is the registered weight capacity of that truck?
[01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:44.000]  It's registered as a combination vehicle at 80,000.
[01:24:44.000 --> 01:24:49.000]  And I was sitting right at, you know, in between 74 and 76.
[01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  But at the time I had no knowledge that, you know, it was registered as a combination under 80,000.
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:25:02.000]  So I was just doing what my boss told me to do.
[01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  And then I get stopped and they write me a ticket because I was, you know, 12,000 something pounds overweight.
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  Well, okay, but I'm still confused. You're saying you're sitting between 72 and 76.
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  You're rated as a combination under 80. How did that put you overweight?
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:26.000]  Well, because they said that it all goes by the length of your vehicle.
[01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:30.000]  And I know this now because he explained it to me.
[01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  But they said it goes by the length of your vehicle and the amount of axle that you have on your vehicle.
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:48.000]  And that enables you to carry less or more weight, basically.
[01:25:48.000 --> 01:25:59.000]  So if it's 25 feet or under, you can only carry, you know, with five axles, you know, that's doing the back and then the two-drop axle.
[01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:14.000]  And then obviously the steer axle, then you're going to be running, I think you said 64 or something, 64,000 is the legal amount because it's below 25 feet in length.
[01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  I know this now. I did not know that then.
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:21.000]  Okay, well, your boss certainly should have.
[01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  I agree. So I would take it back to him and say, hey, look, you remember that load you told me to pick up with X amount of weight in it?
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:39.000]  And now you're, I've got a ticket because I'm 12,000 pounds overweight. You guys intend to pay this and get this off my record because you ordered it or what?
[01:26:39.000 --> 01:26:41.000]  I guarantee you they're not.
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  And his answer is, well, I told you to stay below 65.
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:53.000]  From now on, say you want me to get anything, give it to me in writing.
[01:26:53.000 --> 01:27:03.000]  I don't drive for the guy anymore. He called me earlier and wanted me to come make some runs for him tomorrow and so he can get some time to find another guy.
[01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  But I told him before the holidays, you know, that I wouldn't get a drive for him anymore and he needed to find a replacement.
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:19.000]  And I guess he just thought that I would change my mind over the holidays or something because these things do badger than me.
[01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:28.000]  Yeah. Well, like I say, as far as the problem is, you're stuck with the ticket. You were operating in a commercial capacity.
[01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:34.000]  You were getting paid for it. You gave him a license and admitted to it. You're stuck.
[01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:38.000]  That's the downside of where you're at.
[01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  So I don't have anything. I couldn't fight it or go to court.
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:50.000]  The only thing you can do is see if the citation complies with 708.105 Texas Transportation Code.
[01:27:50.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  708. Okay.
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:28:07.000]  708.105. Read that carefully. Find that statement on the ticket. And if that statement is not the largest type, I don't care what other kind of type is on that entire citation.
[01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:20.000]  If there is anything on that citation that is bigger than the letters that are in that statement, then the ticket to the league was a matter of law under 708.105.
[01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:27.000]  Now, the officer that wrote the ticket, he did put on there that my weight was registered as 80,000.
[01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  And he put on there what my weight was and whatnot.
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  I don't know if that'll carry any weight when we go to court with it or not.
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:43.000]  Well, again, you're arguing merits versus arguing the citation being invalid. Check that first.
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:46.000]  Then worry about arguing merits.
[01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:48.000]  Okay.
[01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:55.000]  Okay. And if nothing else, I would highly recommend you start coming to the Sunday classes at Brave New Books.
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  We're not having one this coming Sunday, but we'll pick classes up again the following Sunday.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  They're two to five at Brave New Books at the corner of Martin Luther King and Guadalupe.
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:08.000]  Okay.
[01:29:08.000 --> 01:29:10.000]  I will be there.
[01:29:10.000 --> 01:29:12.000]  Okay.
[01:29:12.000 --> 01:29:15.000]  I should appreciate it. Thanks for your time, sir.
[01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:17.000]  Yes, sir. No problem.
[01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:20.000]  All right. We're going to go to Metta.
[01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:23.000]  Metta is out there hanging off the water tower. I'm betting.
[01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:25.000]  Ms. Metta, what can we do for you?
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:27.000]  Freezing.
[01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:32.000]  What can we do for you? Or a question?
[01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  Don't man, you called in early on purpose.
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:36.000]  Hi.
[01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:43.000]  Yeah, Metta. I'm sorry, sir. All right. We're going to break. Please don't fall off the freeze before we get back. Okay?
[01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  All right. We'll get right back with you. Hang on just a second.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  All right, folks. This is Ruling Law Radio.
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  We've got about a half an hour left in the show. T, I see you there on the board.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:55.000]  Don't drop off or disappear. I'll get you on the other side.
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:29:58.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:30.000]  What is being hidden from us? For more information, please go to okcbombingtruth.com
[01:30:30.000 --> 01:30:33.000]  Talk about California Dreaming.
[01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:40.000]  Berkeley researchers have found a way to reconstruct and play back images recorded in other people's minds.
[01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:46.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll have more on this fascinating but creepy technological experiment in a moment.
[01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:57.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:57.000 --> 01:31:02.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:31:02.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:12.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:16.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:25.000]  While you think you're a mind reader, scientists may one day get a glimpse into people's dreams, memories, and even fantasies by reconstructing their brain images.
[01:31:25.000 --> 01:31:32.000]  Berkeley researchers watched video in an MRI machine, then had a computer match the images with their brain activity.
[01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  This allowed the computer to later show them what their own brains had just processed.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:42.000]  If this imagery could be broadcast, paraplegics might control their environment by imagining movements. Cool.
[01:31:42.000 --> 01:31:48.000]  Now the creepy part, police could also use this technology to read the memories of unwilling subjects.
[01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  Eek. I just had a minority report moment.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:32:20.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:23.000]  We are back. This is Law Radio.
[01:32:23.000 --> 01:32:28.000]  Call in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:35.000]  Right now we are talking to Metta, who is hanging off the water tower out there in Texas land.
[01:32:35.000 --> 01:32:39.000]  Or at least we were. She dropped off the line again.
[01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:42.000]  I will get to you as quick as you can call back in, Metta.
[01:32:42.000 --> 01:32:47.000]  Right now we're going to go ahead and take T. T, what can we do for you?
[01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:52.000]  What's up, Eddie? I'll be real fast. I've got a situation.
[01:32:52.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  I heard you talk about it in class one Sunday.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  The other day I was in Best 5 and I bought something and I tried to return it the next day
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:09.000]  and they wouldn't let me return it without the photo ID or a license.
[01:33:09.000 --> 01:33:15.000]  So I ain't going to have been listening to what your theme is on that.
[01:33:15.000 --> 01:33:18.000]  They didn't let you return it without a photo ID or license?
[01:33:18.000 --> 01:33:19.000]  Right.
[01:33:19.000 --> 01:33:23.000]  Did you ask them what this policy allegedly comes from?
[01:33:23.000 --> 01:33:31.000]  They said that it had to do something with the program, something like a fraud.
[01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:32.000]  But the thing is...
[01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:35.000]  You have the actual store receipt?
[01:33:35.000 --> 01:33:42.000]  Yes, it's on the store receipt and they don't tell you when you make the purchase.
[01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:48.000]  Right, which is exactly why people need to be asking what the return policies and procedures are
[01:33:48.000 --> 01:33:51.000]  about these companies before they'll do business with them.
[01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  Best Buy got on my blacklist a long time ago.
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:34:01.000]  I don't buy anything in Best Buy anymore and nor will I buy in several other types of those retailers
[01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  for exactly those types of reasons.
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  Their policy on how they accept returns is strictly up to them.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:14.000]  The only way to change it is to make a public outcry that hits them in the pocketbook.
[01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:18.000]  Otherwise, they're going to do what they want and as long as it's their business,
[01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:23.000]  hey, they set the rules for how they're willing to take their exchanges.
[01:34:23.000 --> 01:34:24.000]  Okay.
[01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:25.000]  Okay?
[01:34:25.000 --> 01:34:26.000]  Okay.
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  All right, man.
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  Yep, no problem.
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  All right, let's give back to Metta before she comes off that tower.
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:35.000]  Metta.
[01:34:35.000 --> 01:34:36.000]  Okay.
[01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:44.000]  All right, we've been having problems, not me and Pat, but a lot of my men who are mostly hunters.
[01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:45.000]  Yeah.
[01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:51.000]  And one of the things that I've been doing a lot of reading on is on Tent.
[01:34:51.000 --> 01:34:55.000]  The young man, he said that he was in it drinking.
[01:34:55.000 --> 01:34:56.000]  The question...
[01:34:56.000 --> 01:34:58.000]  Yeah, he was in his tent.
[01:34:58.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  The question I have is that the Parks and Wildlife guy, he was drinking in the tent.
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  The opportunity from entering the residence and temporary residence includes a tent,
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:21.000]  a cabin, a motor home, a motel room.
[01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:26.000]  Yeah, well, the thing is what probably was the case was the guy had the flaps open
[01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  and the park ranger could see him.
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:33.000]  But the question is, is inside the tent still considered a public area?
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  But regardless of that, the only place where this alleged charge comes from is out of the Texas Administrative Code.
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:45.000]  And it's under Rule 65.199.
[01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:58.000]  That's in Title 31, Part 2, Chapter 65, Subchapter H, as in Harry, Rule 65.199.
[01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:08.000]  What the park ranger fails to realize, though, is that these rules and regulations that are put in the Texas Administrative Code are not law.
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  They cannot be law.
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  They're not enacted by the legislature.
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  They are only binding upon the individual agency because they're the ones that are responsible for writing these regulations.
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  And just like an ordinance, the regulation is only valid if there is a state law upon which it's based.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:35.000]  And in this case, there isn't one.
[01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:45.000]  But also, if they consider a residence, you have a right to eat and drink with...
[01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:47.000]  Absolutely. I completely agree with you.
[01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:53.000]  And it doesn't matter whether that residence has a picture window on it or not, where the whole world can see what you're doing.
[01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:55.000]  That's nobody's business.
[01:36:55.000 --> 01:36:57.000]  I absolutely agree with you.
[01:36:57.000 --> 01:37:07.000]  But I think 12 was a definition on residence and temporary residence, which includes a tent.
[01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:09.000]  Well, I would agree.
[01:37:09.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  And when he gets in touch with me offline, then I'm going to go over this information with him and educate him on that a little bit.
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:22.000]  But yeah, the only place where the language that appears in this alleged charge exists is in the administrative code.
[01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:25.000]  And that is not law binding upon the people.
[01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:28.000]  That is law binding upon the agency.
[01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  And if the agency creates a punitive action in there, then they have a real problem because that punitive action defined in the TAC is not a law.
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  It's not binding on anybody.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:46.000]  Okay, well, I've got to go.
[01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  Okay, Metta, be careful and thanks for calling in.
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:51.000]  Okay, bye-bye.
[01:37:51.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:38:02.000]  Okay, now we have, I'm going to say either Dana or Danny from somewhere, South America.
[01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:03.000]  All right.
[01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:05.000]  Patty, what can we do for you?
[01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:08.000]  Yes, good evening. I hope you can hear me well.
[01:38:08.000 --> 01:38:11.000]  I'm calling you from Columbia, South America in the coffee zone.
[01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:12.000]  How are you this evening?
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:14.000]  Great. Here you just fine.
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  Is it Danny or Dane or?
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:31.000]  My name is Dana Robert Schwartz and anyone who's listening out there, I'd like you to write my name down and then go and Google my name so you can become more familiar with the case that I'm going to speak to you about right now.
[01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:35.000]  This year on Open Topic tonight, is that correct?
[01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  Well, generally it's traffic stuff on Monday nights, but what do you got?
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:52.000]  I'll tell you, I actually, I'd like first of all to say, I'd like to give a shout out and say hi y'all to all the people that I played tennis for when I was in Odessa, Texas.
[01:38:52.000 --> 01:39:08.000]  I played tennis there in the 80s, 1980s, but I grew up in Los Angeles, California and I'm a former South Los Angeles County metal recycler who was singled out from 18 different absentee license operators,
[01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  recycling centers in California, and then I was wrongfully indicted and six counts of state felony recycling fraud for my refusal to sign a knowingly false and incriminating witness statement against the principal suspect in the Alameda metal recycling
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:40.000]  fraud case, which I was the owner of and I had a recycling group in Los Angeles during the decade of the 90s and ran into this past decade.
[01:39:40.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  And I have a new complaint that I have just filed against the California Department of Justice for professional misconduct and witness abuse for its refusal to honor the 2004 verbal immunity deal that was given to me in exchange
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  for my cooperation during the incorrectly stated and misdirected 2003 to 2005 recycling fraud investigation of the Watts area neighborhood recycling center that I founded in 1997.
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  And the reason for my call is because I'm trying to inform people about this situation whereby the government today is out of control, which we all know I'm a devoted listener to Alex Jones show.
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  I've found out about your radio show. I have to say I'm a new listener and I'm very happy to hear in the proud state of Texas, you're putting on this type of forum.
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  So, you know, I'd like to the purpose of my call, I'd like to explore the different issues, the difficulties I've experienced with your listeners related to the filing of the complaint that I just made.
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:13.000]  Because obviously it happened six years ago, but I have been forced, I left the country by accident six months before I was indicted, wrongfully indicted, want to emphasize.
[01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:22.000]  I went to America where I was when I was married to my first wife who was from this region, the coffee zone of Columbia.
[01:41:22.000 --> 01:41:44.000]  And I had gone to visit my dying ex-mother-in-law just by accident in late 2005. When I was outside the country, I was indicted two years after participating in this investigation where I freely participated because I was told I was not a suspect or under investigation.
[01:41:44.000 --> 01:41:58.000]  And as the absentee licensee, the state auditors had asked me for my help because they suspected the Latino immigrant who I allowed to operate my license because I had two centers.
[01:41:58.000 --> 01:42:05.000]  I obviously couldn't operate both and my father was a military, a former military salvage dealer.
[01:42:05.000 --> 01:42:19.000]  So he ended up acquiring a lot of property in the industrial section of Los Angeles, whole blocks in fact, and I tried to turn them into useful ways of benefiting the public and protecting the property.
[01:42:19.000 --> 01:42:38.000]  Now this property is in Watts and if anybody knows the history of Los Angeles and the history of riots in the United States in 1965, there was a very famous riot that started in the neighborhood of Watts, which is the southern part of Los Angeles County.
[01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:54.000]  It's a marginalized area, high crime rate drug filled area. And I turned this whole block industrial property into a recycling center to try to protect the problem property and put a warm body business there.
[01:42:54.000 --> 01:43:12.000]  And then I had no problems for several years and the state ended up turning around and asking me for my cooperation. And instead of closing the center, because I am an honest person, by the way, I had a ten year history prior to this as a scrap metal dealer.
[01:43:12.000 --> 01:43:26.000]  I was one of the prominent young scrap metal dealers in Los Angeles during the decade of the 1990s and I produced about 120 metric tons a day and I was made a member of the...
[01:43:26.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. I appreciate all the back fill in story and everything else, but this isn't all that we're here for.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  If you've got a point you need to make about something or a question you need to ask, I need you to get to that, because you're not the only person we've got on the line here waiting to get in here, okay?
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:53.000]  So, we're going to break, so hang on just a minute and I'll pick you up on the other side. This is Rule of Law Radio, 512-646-1984.
[01:43:53.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  This is Eddie Craig, Trevor Stevens, Randy Kelton. We'll be right back on the other side of the break.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  Hey, did you hear? Ron Paul has announced he's running for president in 2012.
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Who's Ron Paul?
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:11.000]  Really? Okay, put down the cell phone for one minute. Your friends really don't care about your Twitter updates on what you had for breakfast.
[01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:14.000]  Oh, but I'd love to make those little smiley faces with punctuation marks.
[01:44:14.000 --> 01:44:21.000]  Of course you do. Now, listen closely. You need to go down to Brave New Books and learn as much as you can about Ron Paul and his message before it's too late.
[01:44:21.000 --> 01:44:28.000]  They have all of his books and many of the books he talks about. They also have t-shirts, bumper stickers, and yard signs so that you can show your support for him during the campaign.
[01:44:28.000 --> 01:44:31.000]  Brave New Books? Do they have Harry Potter and Twilight?
[01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:37.000]  No, but they do carry a large selection of survival and preparedness books to protect your family in time of emergency.
[01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:40.000]  Ugh, that sounds like that show in the Discovery Channel.
[01:44:40.000 --> 01:44:48.000]  Yeah, there's even a wilderness survival expert that teaches classes called Earthskill School that you can sign up for on the website bravenewbookstore.com. What are you doing?
[01:44:48.000 --> 01:44:54.000]  I'm tweeting all my friends that they should go to bravenewbookstore.com or down to the bookstore in person. Where's it located?
[01:44:54.000 --> 01:44:59.000]  You know, Fort Guadalupe Street? There, it's set. I even made a smiley face. Great.
[01:45:25.000 --> 01:45:30.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:30.000 --> 01:45:36.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:36.000 --> 01:45:45.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:45.000 --> 01:45:54.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:54.000 --> 01:45:58.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:58.000 --> 01:46:26.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:30.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio.
[01:46:30.000 --> 01:46:34.000]  We are in the final segment of our Monday Night Traffic Show.
[01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:40.000]  Right now, we are talking to Demay in South America.
[01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:45.000]  Okay, go ahead. What was your actual question or issue here?
[01:46:45.000 --> 01:46:52.000]  Well, my issue is this, that I've had several bad attorneys in the last one last year, ripped me off,
[01:46:52.000 --> 01:47:01.000]  and I got an unfair decision in 2010 from Judge Lance Edo, the famous judge of the O.J. Simpson case,
[01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:10.000]  who has decided to block my ability to defend myself because I'm outside the country in Columbia where there is no extradition
[01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:14.000]  for this class of white-collar crime that I'm charged with.
[01:47:14.000 --> 01:47:22.000]  Anyway, the prosecutor has gone after me because she wants to make a name for herself and she wants to make an example
[01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:26.000]  of anybody who lets a Latino operate their license.
[01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:31.000]  So what I'm hoping for is that there's some, one of your listeners out there will come to my rescue
[01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:36.000]  because I've been living in Columbia for the last six years out of protest,
[01:47:36.000 --> 01:47:45.000]  and I need to find a right defender and somebody who will, who is a lawyer, who's interested in helping me with this case
[01:47:45.000 --> 01:47:52.000]  because I need to appeal the decision. For example, the last attorney, he failed to check with the judge before
[01:47:52.000 --> 01:48:00.000]  taking two years to write this motion to demur based on the fact that I had this secret immunity deal
[01:48:00.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  that was particularly withdrawn. So I'd like to just give you readers, if I could, my email address
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:12.000]  and the correct spelling of my name at this time, if there's anybody who's a lawyer out there who's interested
[01:48:12.000 --> 01:48:18.000]  because in California I've been up and down the street and it seems there's a hysteria of fear,
[01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:23.000]  a climate of fear in California where nobody wants to go after the state.
[01:48:23.000 --> 01:48:30.000]  And I'd just like to last say that just last week the professional standards group of the Attorney General accepted
[01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:34.000]  my complaint and they said they'll be investigating this matter.
[01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:40.000]  But I would like to have a good-hearted attorney out there who's interested in human rights
[01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:48.000]  because I have been defamed the last five years by the State Department of Justice website,
[01:48:48.000 --> 01:48:55.000]  which you'll find if you Google my name, and they've continued to characterize me as a fugitive from justice.
[01:48:55.000 --> 01:49:01.000]  So the question is, how can you be a fugitive when you were told you were excused from the investigation
[01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:03.000]  by investigators and told-
[01:49:03.000 --> 01:49:05.000]  Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Your business.
[01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:11.000]  First off, telling you you're excused doesn't mean anything. That's not a promise or anything else.
[01:49:11.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  That's never has been, never will be. Cops lie. Investigators lie. Prosecutors lie.
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:21.000]  It's not a crime. It should be, but it's not.
[01:49:21.000 --> 01:49:26.000]  You know what? I'm guilty. I freely admit I'm guilty of being naive and trusting of my government,
[01:49:26.000 --> 01:49:29.000]  but I agree. I would never trust them again.
[01:49:29.000 --> 01:49:34.000]  Okay, and the other problem is if you think you're going to get a benevolent lawyer fighting for truth,
[01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:40.000]  honor, justice, and the American way, you've been living outside this country way too dang long.
[01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:47.000]  Because there aren't any. It's all about the money. It's always about the money.
[01:49:47.000 --> 01:49:55.000]  Now, I don't know what the situation is as far as what you can afford to pay, who you've talked to, who you haven't talked to.
[01:49:55.000 --> 01:50:01.000]  Don't have a clue. But if you want one, you're going to have to go looking because they're not going to come to you.
[01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:03.000]  In this case, I can almost guarantee you that.
[01:50:03.000 --> 01:50:08.000]  What about a public defender? Because I contacted their office in LA County as well.
[01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:14.000]  You ain't getting a public defender as long as you're outside this country. Bet on it.
[01:50:14.000 --> 01:50:22.000]  Well, you know, the amazing thing is, like I said, is that I have been, I was conned by the state investigators
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:27.000]  who tried to get me to, they just used me to try to get me to sign a false statement.
[01:50:27.000 --> 01:50:32.000]  And there's nothing in my history that shows I've ever done anything illegal.
[01:50:32.000 --> 01:50:39.000]  Okay, again, what is your evidence that the statement they were attempting to get you to sign was false?
[01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:45.000]  Oh, because I didn't sign it first off. I mean, it said a bunch of things.
[01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:49.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. That's not the answer to the question I asked.
[01:50:49.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  What is your evidence that the statement they were asking you to sign was false?
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:03.000]  Well, they said that I had, the statement said that I had certain knowledge about material facts which I had no knowledge of
[01:51:03.000 --> 01:51:11.000]  and I had never spoken to the investigators with during the three months of my participation in their investigation in 2004.
[01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:17.000]  Okay, then they would have had to cough up evidence that showed that you had.
[01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:22.000]  And if that didn't happen, then they couldn't very well do that, could they?
[01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:27.000]  Well, that's what's going to hopefully happen now. They're going to have to produce, if there are records, for example,
[01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:34.000]  of when I went through the front door at the task force headquarters in Los Angeles and I went to meet the various meetings,
[01:51:34.000 --> 01:51:39.000]  I don't know if there are records. In fact, they haven't turned over the public records they have.
[01:51:39.000 --> 01:51:44.000]  They'll show that the evidence that was presented to the grand jury was an out and out lie.
[01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:51.000]  I've got a copy of the grand jury transcript and everything they said to the grand jury through their so-called expert state witnesses
[01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:57.000]  is a pure lie that could be turned over if I could obtain a copy of the public records.
[01:51:57.000 --> 01:52:04.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. If you could obtain the copy of what public record?
[01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:11.000]  Well, for example, the gentleman who operated my license, the reason I chose him to run the center was because he had
[01:52:11.000 --> 01:52:15.000]  experienced as a California recycler operating other centers.
[01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:24.000]  And he also had an independent transportation company, which I used in my scrap metal business prior to him coming to work for me.
[01:52:24.000 --> 01:52:31.000]  So he used those trucks to operate the fraud. The state knows about that. All the grand jury transcript shows that.
[01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:38.000]  In fact, I was just thrown in at the end of ten long days of testimony in the last few hours.
[01:52:38.000 --> 01:52:46.000]  And they named four different facts, all of which were untrue. They said that I, and basically they offered me a deal three years ago
[01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:55.000]  to let this go away. And I won't because I'm sick and tired of we have our government and justice officials who are taking advantage
[01:52:55.000 --> 01:53:07.000]  of people like me who are trusting and believe that America is a place where people respect each other's rights and don't lie.
[01:53:07.000 --> 01:53:19.000]  Okay. Again, if all of this has evidence and support of your side of the story, what is the issue with you being in South America?
[01:53:19.000 --> 01:53:21.000]  Why aren't you back here fighting?
[01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:28.000]  I went out of the country. This is the main issue. I went out of the country to visit a dying ex-mother-in-law six months before the indictment.
[01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:36.000]  I had no idea that I was going to be indicted because two years prior to that, I was told I could leave the investigation if I wasn't willing to lie.
[01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:43.000]  Okay. So they said, we'll probably call you in the future to testify we need you. But you're free to go about your business.
[01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:49.000]  You're free to go abroad. You can do anything you want. We'll never bother you again. And I thought I had a immunity deal.
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:53.000]  And by the way, the way they tricked me was that they told me, and this is what I want everyone to understand,
[01:53:53.000 --> 01:54:01.000]  if you're going to participate with the government in any kind of fraud investigation, and they tell you, hey, you're not a suspect.
[01:54:01.000 --> 01:54:10.000]  That's how they got me because when I asked them to put the immunity deal in writing, they said, we can't because you're not a suspect.
[01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:16.000]  You're not under investigation. We only give immunity deals to people who are actually named as a suspect. You're not.
[01:54:16.000 --> 01:54:22.000]  So the question I have for the Attorney General is, at what point did they then make me a suspect?
[01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  Because they misled me for two years and until they obtained the full benefit of my cooperation.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:38.000]  By the way, that included keeping the recycling center open after I was informed in June 2004 about the state's suspicion of,
[01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:46.000]  supposedly, only the licensed operator of my recycling center. And they said, you are not under suspicion.
[01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:49.000]  So you don't have to get an attorney. See, that's how.
[01:54:49.000 --> 01:54:56.000]  Okay, but here's the other thing. You also do not have to open your mouth and cooperate.
[01:54:56.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  Without an immunity deal, anything you say can and will be used against you even if it will convict you or give them reason to charge you with something.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:12.000]  You're right. I was arrogant because let me just tell you, step back one second.
[01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:17.000]  Six months prior to that, I had a serious facial accident just by a freak thing.
[01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:24.000]  A dog bit me on Christmas and bit the tip of my nose off, a vicious dog at a Christmas party.
[01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:28.000]  Anyways, I spent six months recuperating.
[01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:34.000]  And when I was contacted in June 2004 and they saw the still healing scars on my face, they said,
[01:55:34.000 --> 01:55:37.000]  well, we know you can't be involved in this.
[01:55:37.000 --> 01:55:41.000]  There were circumstances that led me to be arrogant and foolish.
[01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:47.000]  But like I said, I argued with my wife, in fact, and I criticized her at the time because she said, you better get an attorney.
[01:55:47.000 --> 01:55:54.000]  And I said, why? I'm not a suspect. These guys know I've been hospitalized, I've been home recuperating for six months.
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:56.000]  What could they have to tell me?
[01:55:56.000 --> 01:56:02.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait. Again, what does this have to do with your situation where we can help you at all?
[01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:10.000]  Well, the thing is, is that I'm trying to tell people about finally, you know, that it's hard to fight the government.
[01:56:10.000 --> 01:56:13.000]  That's what they say, right? And you know, I was tricked.
[01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:18.000]  No, it isn't hard to fight the government if you make the effort to be prepared to do so.
[01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:24.000]  And you don't walk in and do something that puts your neck in a noose.
[01:56:24.000 --> 01:56:32.000]  Okay? It's not so hard to fight them if you just don't take for granted that they're your friend.
[01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  That was your first mistake.
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:39.000]  Well, I didn't think they were my friend. I was outraged because they showed me a forged document.
[01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:43.000]  They had a few different little irregularities.
[01:56:43.000 --> 01:56:48.000]  Wait, you're giving me your opinion about this document being forged.
[01:56:48.000 --> 01:56:52.000]  What is a forgery about it? What did they give you?
[01:56:52.000 --> 01:56:57.000]  They showed me a copy of a shipping document and I was still operating to the license.
[01:56:57.000 --> 01:57:04.000]  This gentleman was operating the center, but I was in charge and when I was ill and sick,
[01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:10.000]  my wife was taking over and signing shipping documents because we were dealing with the state's money.
[01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:14.000]  As a California recycler, you get like one penny.
[01:57:14.000 --> 01:57:15.000]  Wait, stop.
[01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:21.000]  What document did they give you?
[01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:30.000]  Well, they showed me a recent document, a shipping document from my center that contained my forged signature.
[01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:34.000]  Okay, and you know it was a forged document. Why?
[01:57:34.000 --> 01:57:41.000]  Yeah, because it wasn't my signature and I didn't authorize it.
[01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:46.000]  Okay, and did you demand a copy of this alleged document?
[01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:57.000]  They had discovered, they had called my house to inform me that a load that had been delivered from my center to a processor that contained about $20,000.
[01:57:57.000 --> 01:58:00.000]  Wait, you're not answering my question.
[01:58:00.000 --> 01:58:03.000]  I'm trying to get a picture of what's going on here.
[01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:06.000]  And now we're out of time to get it done.
[01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:11.000]  If you want to pick this up further, you can try calling in Thursday.
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:17.000]  I will not be here, folks. Thursday and Friday, I will be gone back to Nackadoke just to visit with my family.
[01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  But thanks everybody so much for listening in tonight.
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  Danny or Dene, you're going to have to call back in on Thursday and see if you can talk with Randy about this issue.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:32.000]  I don't think he's going to give you a whole lot more sympathy on what we're dealing with here because you let yourself get led around by the nose,
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  and you've gone and switched your foot in a bear trap all the way up to your neck.
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:39.000]  That's going to be a problem to overcome.
[01:58:39.000 --> 01:58:43.000]  Alright folks, this has been the Monday Night Rule Long Radio Traffic Show.
[01:58:43.000 --> 01:58:51.000]  I am Eddie Craig. Thank you so much for listening. I hope everybody had a merry Christmas and that you all have a happy new year and God bless you each and everyone.
[01:58:51.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Thanks for listening.
[01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:40.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:40.000 --> 01:59:42.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:42.000 --> 01:59:50.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:50.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.