ROL_2011-12-16_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:04.960]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Met.
[00:04.960 --> 00:12.560]  BP said Friday it will receive $250 million from a subcontractor on its Gulf of Mexico
[00:12.560 --> 00:18.240]  oil well which blew out last year, using the money to cover its massive cleanup cost.
[00:18.240 --> 00:23.760]  BP said it reached agreement with Cameron International, designer and manufacturer of
[00:23.760 --> 00:26.480]  the Deepwater Horizon Blowout Preventor.
[00:26.480 --> 00:31.440]  Young Gulf residents say they haven't received full compensation from BP, others that they
[00:31.440 --> 00:34.160]  haven't been compensated at all.
[00:34.160 --> 00:40.320]  400 pages of transcripts of interrogations supposed to have been destroyed as US troops
[00:40.320 --> 00:45.760]  prepared to leave Iraq were recovered by a reporter Wednesday in a Baghdad junkyard
[00:45.760 --> 00:48.320]  as an attendant was burning them as fuel.
[00:48.320 --> 00:52.320]  The documents form part of the military's investigation into what happened at Hedita
[00:52.320 --> 00:59.440]  in 2005 where Marines killed 24 Iraqis including an old man in a wheelchair and women and children,
[00:59.440 --> 01:02.720]  some just toddlers.
[01:02.720 --> 01:08.000]  Montana's Governor Brian Switzer Thursday approved a controversial Canada to Texas
[01:08.000 --> 01:10.960]  Keystone XL pipeline across the state.
[01:10.960 --> 01:17.840]  The Obama administration has delayed its decision until 2013 following protests from environmentalists.
[01:17.840 --> 01:24.000]  Switzer's endorsement comes despite 42,000 gallons of Exxon mobile oil spilling into
[01:24.000 --> 01:28.800]  the Yellowstone River from a pipeline in July.
[01:28.800 --> 01:34.640]  Japan declared Friday the Fukushima Power Plant had reached cold shutdown, a key milestone
[01:34.640 --> 01:40.800]  in efforts to bring under control the world's worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl 25 years ago.
[01:40.800 --> 01:46.240]  The Fukushima plant was damaged March 11 by a massive earthquake and tsunami which damaged
[01:46.240 --> 01:50.160]  its cooling systems, triggering meltdowns and radiation leaks.
[01:50.160 --> 01:54.400]  After months of effort, the water temperature in all three of the affected reactors fell
[01:54.400 --> 01:59.680]  below boiling point in September but Tokyo Electric Power, the plant's operator, waited
[01:59.680 --> 02:04.400]  to see if the amount of radiation emitted from the plant remained stable before declaring
[02:04.400 --> 02:05.760]  a cold shutdown.
[02:05.760 --> 02:09.680]  It will be at least 40 years before Fukushima is decommissioned.
[02:09.680 --> 02:13.040]  The enormous cost of the cleanup has drained Tevco.
[02:13.040 --> 02:17.680]  The government could inject $13 billion into the company as early as next summer
[02:17.680 --> 02:19.680]  in a de facto nationalization.
[02:21.760 --> 02:25.760]  Efforts are underway to end U.S. corporate personhood.
[02:25.760 --> 02:30.880]  The Supreme Court's controversial decision two years ago that corporate political spending
[02:30.880 --> 02:33.840]  is protected as a form of free speech.
[02:33.840 --> 02:39.840]  The ruling has allowed for unrestricted and undisclosed campaign spending by corporations.
[02:39.840 --> 02:45.120]  Senator Bernie Sanders introduced the Saving American Democracy Amendment earlier this
[02:45.120 --> 02:48.800]  month, which would overturn the Citizens United case.
[02:48.800 --> 02:53.760]  The amendment would also ban corporate campaign donations and give Congress and the state's
[02:53.760 --> 02:56.400]  authority to regulate election spending.
[02:56.400 --> 03:14.640]  You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network at ruleoflawradio.com, live free speech
[03:14.640 --> 03:26.880]  and talk radio at its best.
[03:44.880 --> 03:46.880]  Okay, we're back.
[03:46.880 --> 03:50.880]  You may be helping them to get the courage.
[03:50.880 --> 03:58.880]  Rule of Law Radio, we are originators and we are talking to Mike in Texas.
[03:58.880 --> 04:00.880]  Mike, go ahead.
[04:00.880 --> 04:02.880]  Okay, hello Mr. Kelton.
[04:02.880 --> 04:04.880]  We've got kind of a question.
[04:04.880 --> 04:10.880]  Before me, I'm looking at an affidavit for warrant of arrest and detention.
[04:10.880 --> 04:20.880]  And this was generated while I was in handcuffs in Carvers County Courthouse jail.
[04:20.880 --> 04:26.880]  I was originally arrested for having an audio recorder on my neck.
[04:26.880 --> 04:32.880]  They didn't like the fact that I was recording and to me the ground arrested me.
[04:32.880 --> 04:38.880]  And then at some point in that day, when I'm in handcuffs, apparently, they went to the
[04:38.880 --> 04:40.880]  district judge.
[04:40.880 --> 04:44.880]  This is a class B misdemeanor.
[04:44.880 --> 04:50.880]  Some of these things, I'm a little bit confused why they went to a district judge.
[04:50.880 --> 04:54.880]  And what would the name of this hearing be?
[04:54.880 --> 04:58.880]  I mean, is this a probable cause here?
[04:58.880 --> 05:00.880]  That is a good question.
[05:00.880 --> 05:02.880]  You're in handcuffs.
[05:02.880 --> 05:06.880]  They went to a judge in security warrant.
[05:06.880 --> 05:08.880]  Is that what happened?
[05:08.880 --> 05:10.880]  That's what happened.
[05:10.880 --> 05:12.880]  And you weren't brought before that judge?
[05:12.880 --> 05:16.880]  I was not brought before that judge.
[05:16.880 --> 05:20.880]  Have you filed criminal charges against that judge?
[05:20.880 --> 05:22.880]  Not yet, not as of yet.
[05:22.880 --> 05:30.880]  Today I did file a subpoena for her to appear at my next pretrial.
[05:30.880 --> 05:34.880]  That should get interesting.
[05:34.880 --> 05:38.880]  Are you asking for a Frank's hearing?
[05:38.880 --> 05:42.880]  Yes, eventually that's what I want to ask for.
[05:42.880 --> 05:48.880]  That should get interesting because they're not going to want that judge to appear.
[05:48.880 --> 05:56.880]  I think that's maybe why, potentially, why I'm receiving such resistance on such an obvious case.
[05:56.880 --> 06:00.880]  I was able to obtain a video that showed I'm just standing there doing nothing.
[06:00.880 --> 06:08.880]  And in their affidavit, I count at least 14 perjury statements.
[06:08.880 --> 06:14.880]  So, I mean, the affidavit does not match the video which I was not supposed to get.
[06:14.880 --> 06:21.880]  And the court's been working very hard to try to not allow me to enter that video into evidence.
[06:21.880 --> 06:25.880]  Okay, you have another way of using that video as evidence.
[06:25.880 --> 06:29.880]  Use that video as evidence before your local grand jury.
[06:29.880 --> 06:31.880]  You have four of them.
[06:31.880 --> 06:33.880]  Okay, that's a very good idea.
[06:33.880 --> 06:40.880]  You need to hammer the district attorney with criminal complaints against these officers.
[06:40.880 --> 06:43.880]  You have evidence of aggravated perjury.
[06:43.880 --> 06:45.880]  I haven't filed them yet.
[06:45.880 --> 06:49.880]  I was thinking about filing them in the docket itself.
[06:49.880 --> 06:52.880]  I think that would get their attention also.
[06:52.880 --> 06:55.880]  No, it won't get their attention. They'll ignore it.
[06:55.880 --> 07:04.880]  All that'll do is get you a criminal claim against the judge for failing to perform his duty as a magistrate,
[07:04.880 --> 07:06.880]  because he certainly will not do it.
[07:06.880 --> 07:13.880]  What will get you politics is if you run the routine on the prosecutor.
[07:13.880 --> 07:18.880]  You have a prosecutor here who's a first-term prosecutor,
[07:18.880 --> 07:22.880]  and she's looking to get thrown out in this next election.
[07:22.880 --> 07:25.880]  You bring her something like this.
[07:25.880 --> 07:29.880]  It's going to be for her a political football.
[07:29.880 --> 07:31.880]  What does she do with it?
[07:31.880 --> 07:42.880]  We're broadcast all over Austin, and we'll be glad to tell everybody what the prosecutor's doing or not doing.
[07:42.880 --> 07:45.880]  What would you call this hearing?
[07:45.880 --> 07:47.880]  Is it a probable cause hearing?
[07:47.880 --> 07:49.880]  Is it an examining trial?
[07:49.880 --> 07:54.880]  There's only one thing it can be, is an examining trial.
[07:54.880 --> 08:02.880]  So I had an examining trial before registration, and I wasn't present, and they probably didn't even look at it.
[08:02.880 --> 08:03.880]  Wait a minute. Stop. Stop.
[08:03.880 --> 08:05.880]  Magistration.
[08:05.880 --> 08:08.880]  I was in my cell.
[08:08.880 --> 08:14.880]  So again, a star chamber hearing, not in view of the public.
[08:14.880 --> 08:21.880]  Not in view of the public, and you were not granted access, which you absolutely have a right to.
[08:21.880 --> 08:29.880]  An examining trial, in an examining trial, all of the rules of evidence apply.
[08:29.880 --> 08:33.880]  Chapter 16, a whole chapter covering examining trials.
[08:33.880 --> 08:38.880]  You really need to go for this district judge.
[08:38.880 --> 08:48.880]  So was this an examining trial, or was, you know, when an officer goes before a judge and seeks a warrant for arrest, that's not an examining trial.
[08:48.880 --> 09:03.880]  That, when a magistrate sits for the purpose of examining into a criminal accusation, that is an examining court, Article 2.11.
[09:03.880 --> 09:13.880]  The only way a judge can issue a warrant is after sitting for the purpose of examining into a criminal accusation.
[09:13.880 --> 09:22.880]  It is an examining trial. Under law, it can be nothing else.
[09:22.880 --> 09:36.880]  That judge held an examining trial. Go to Chapter 16, and it will tell you the first thing the judge has to tell you is what your rights are.
[09:36.880 --> 09:46.880]  And it lists them all. It essentially lists everything that's in Article 1, Paragraph 10, Constitution.
[09:46.880 --> 09:53.880]  But it very specifically grants you more rights. It grants you the right to make a statement.
[09:53.880 --> 09:57.880]  It grants you the right to see all the evidence before it's presented.
[09:57.880 --> 10:06.880]  It grants you the right to be represented by counsel. There's a whole stack of them in there.
[10:06.880 --> 10:14.880]  And they do none of that stuff. So this judge held an examining trial. It doesn't matter what she thinks she did.
[10:14.880 --> 10:18.880]  She held an examining trial, and then she had a duty.
[10:18.880 --> 10:28.880]  And this is an outrageous, idiotic case, so it's a very good one to throw in the court's face and say,
[10:28.880 --> 10:34.880]  this is why you're supposed to do it right, to keep this sort of thing from happening.
[10:34.880 --> 10:45.880]  You need to file against these officers and make it clear to the courts if the court had done her job, this would not happen.
[10:45.880 --> 10:51.880]  These officers wouldn't have these criminal charges against them. Their careers wouldn't be at risk.
[10:51.880 --> 10:59.880]  And this is only happening because you refuse to do your job. You're the real criminal here.
[10:59.880 --> 11:08.880]  Okay, so district attorney, district judge, a different district judge, and then finally the grand jury.
[11:08.880 --> 11:13.880]  Absolutely. Against the district judge, he refuses to take the complaints.
[11:13.880 --> 11:20.880]  District attorney refuses criminal complaints against the district attorney to the district judge.
[11:20.880 --> 11:26.880]  He refuses criminal complaints against the district judge back to the grand jury.
[11:26.880 --> 11:34.880]  They will recognize the routine, and right now the more people we can get running that routine on the prosecutor,
[11:34.880 --> 11:37.880]  the more sensitive she's going to get to it.
[11:37.880 --> 11:42.880]  This is dangerous because it creates local politics.
[11:42.880 --> 11:54.880]  These district judges are going to get tired of citizens filing judicial conduct complaints and criminal accusations against them.
[11:54.880 --> 11:58.880]  The big problem with grand juries.
[11:58.880 --> 12:02.880]  My prosecutor in Wise County here once said,
[12:02.880 --> 12:08.880]  those darn grand jurors, you never know what they're going to do.
[12:08.880 --> 12:14.880]  And this judge is sitting here thinking, those darn grand jurors,
[12:14.880 --> 12:25.880]  what if I railroaded one of those grand jurors' children or grandchildren, and he remembers who I am?
[12:25.880 --> 12:29.880]  I could be toast.
[12:29.880 --> 12:32.880]  An indictment, and I'm history.
[12:32.880 --> 12:42.880]  Even if I get the indictment thrown out, I'm still history because perception is everything.
[12:42.880 --> 12:46.880]  So we create a local politics.
[12:46.880 --> 12:48.880]  I've got another question.
[12:48.880 --> 12:53.880]  I was fortunate or unfortunate enough to be on a jury last week.
[12:53.880 --> 12:55.880]  So I was selected.
[12:55.880 --> 12:59.880]  It was a DUI case.
[12:59.880 --> 13:11.880]  And one of the more interesting facets of that was that the prosecutor openly stated in Bourdire that he was not a county attorney.
[13:11.880 --> 13:20.880]  He had just graduated law school, was a member of the bar, and he was auditioning for a job as a county attorney.
[13:20.880 --> 13:24.880]  And he prosecuted in the name of the state.
[13:24.880 --> 13:30.880]  And at the end, I used a series of questions just to be sure.
[13:30.880 --> 13:34.880]  In Bourdire, you stated that you're not a county attorney.
[13:34.880 --> 13:35.880]  Yes, that's true.
[13:35.880 --> 13:42.880]  I said, do you have a statement of office? No, do you have both of office? No. Are you an employee of the county? No.
[13:42.880 --> 13:47.880]  Under what authority do you have to prosecute in the name of the state?
[13:47.880 --> 13:53.880]  And he said, well, rule 12 of the bar.
[13:53.880 --> 13:59.880]  What?
[13:59.880 --> 14:05.880]  Yeah, it was a pathetic, idiotic answer just to get him out of the way.
[14:05.880 --> 14:11.880]  That right there is a prosecutorial misconduct complaint right off the bat.
[14:11.880 --> 14:18.880]  I'm working on getting, I wasn't able to get the cause number.
[14:18.880 --> 14:22.880]  So I'm working on getting that.
[14:22.880 --> 14:29.880]  But I'm left with a dilemma. I mean, if I file a bar grievance against this guy, then he could not potentially,
[14:29.880 --> 14:33.880]  is that true, that he could potentially not ever practice law again?
[14:33.880 --> 14:36.880]  Well, just keep this... Oh, no.
[14:36.880 --> 14:44.880]  Okay, if he's, this one, he will be covered by the bar.
[14:44.880 --> 14:56.880]  He won't be able to get malpractice insurance, but so, but if he's a prosecutor, that's not really necessary because the state handles that part.
[14:56.880 --> 15:10.880]  It will mark his go against him once he, if he doesn't get hired as a prosecutor, making a stupid statement like that is probably a good reason for them not to hire him.
[15:10.880 --> 15:17.880]  And in that case, it will harm him. And it should.
[15:17.880 --> 15:23.880]  He's learned counsel. He knew better. Yeah.
[15:23.880 --> 15:27.880]  He'd come and prosecute this when he knew he didn't have authority.
[15:27.880 --> 15:31.880]  You might look up, if you send me an email, I'll send it to you.
[15:31.880 --> 15:37.880]  The American Bar Association Standards for the Prosecutorial Function.
[15:37.880 --> 15:50.880]  I've got him. And in there, if a prosecutor has knowledge that another prosecutor has done something improper, he has a duty to report it.
[15:50.880 --> 16:06.880]  If a elected prosecutor asks a subordinate to do something that's improper, according to these standards, he is required to refuse.
[16:06.880 --> 16:13.880]  And this would be an interesting situation because the prosecutor put this guy who's new, don't know what's going on.
[16:13.880 --> 16:20.880]  He puts him in this position and gets him screwed. That'll work out great.
[16:20.880 --> 16:26.880]  I just remember the real world problem that we got here and the solution for it.
[16:26.880 --> 16:31.880]  Big bag filled with rocks, wrote the tie shut, combined with very deep water.
[16:31.880 --> 16:35.880]  Prosecutorial misconduct solution at your waiting.
[16:35.880 --> 16:40.880]  Look here, Randy Kelton, Denver Stevens, Eddie Craig with L'Oreal.
[16:40.880 --> 16:44.880]  Calling number is 502-646-1984.
[16:44.880 --> 16:48.880]  We've got a number of callers. We'll finish up with Mike on the other side.
[16:48.880 --> 16:53.880]  We'll go on to Kyle, Mike and Grant. We'll be right back.
[16:53.880 --> 16:54.880]  Thank you.
[16:54.880 --> 17:07.880]  It's the story of a lost city, lost opportunity, lost hope.
[17:07.880 --> 17:11.880]  A story of failed policies, failed leadership.
[17:11.880 --> 17:19.880]  A story of smooth talking politicians, games of he said, she said, rhetoric and division.
[17:19.880 --> 17:25.880]  One man has stood apart, stood strong and true.
[17:25.880 --> 17:32.880]  Voting against every tax increase, every unbound budget, every time.
[17:32.880 --> 17:38.880]  Standing up to the Washington machine, guided by principal, Ron Paul.
[17:38.880 --> 17:41.880]  The one who will stop the spending.
[17:41.880 --> 17:45.880]  Save the dollar, create jobs, bring peace.
[17:45.880 --> 17:49.880]  The one who will restore liberty.
[17:49.880 --> 17:56.880]  Ron Paul, the one who can beat Obama and restore America now.
[17:56.880 --> 17:59.880]  I'm Ron Paul and I approve this message.
[17:59.880 --> 18:04.880]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:04.880 --> 18:08.880]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method.
[18:08.880 --> 18:13.880]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[18:13.880 --> 18:19.880]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:19.880 --> 18:23.880]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons.
[18:23.880 --> 18:25.880]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:25.880 --> 18:28.880]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:28.880 --> 18:32.880]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:32.880 --> 18:37.880]  The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:37.880 --> 18:40.880]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.880 --> 18:46.880]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner.
[18:46.880 --> 18:49.880]  Or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.880 --> 18:51.880]  That's ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:51.880 --> 18:56.880]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:56.880 --> 18:59.880]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.880 --> 19:03.880]  Well don't let nothing get to you.
[19:03.880 --> 19:06.880]  One of the father can't do it by you.
[19:06.880 --> 19:09.880]  And don't let bad mind people hurt you.
[19:09.880 --> 19:12.880]  Until it doesn't get behind you.
[19:12.880 --> 19:14.880]  Know what I mean?
[19:14.880 --> 19:15.880]  My friend.
[19:15.880 --> 19:17.880]  And all I judge is a couple.
[19:17.880 --> 19:20.880]  Don't sting the heart, McCree.
[19:20.880 --> 19:23.880]  Get in your problem, then.
[19:23.880 --> 19:26.880]  Call and he's made one study.
[19:26.880 --> 19:29.880]  Everyone you know he was staying.
[19:29.880 --> 19:32.880]  Don't sting the heart, McCree.
[19:32.880 --> 19:35.880]  Get in your problem, then.
[19:35.880 --> 19:38.880]  Call and he's made one study.
[19:38.880 --> 19:41.880]  Everyone you know he was staying.
[19:41.880 --> 19:42.880]  Hey, I'm a king, man.
[19:42.880 --> 19:44.880]  He's everything.
[19:44.880 --> 19:45.880]  He's everything to me.
[19:45.880 --> 19:47.880]  That's what I call him.
[19:47.880 --> 19:48.880]  Don't talk to me, me.
[19:48.880 --> 19:50.880]  I may pray to him.
[19:50.880 --> 19:53.880]  Because he's the only one could answer him.
[19:53.880 --> 19:56.880]  They know business, what we can man say in.
[19:56.880 --> 19:58.880]  Man, can you know it's this leading?
[19:58.880 --> 20:01.880]  They turn to trust in, but McCree.
[20:01.880 --> 20:04.880]  Get in your problem, then.
[20:04.880 --> 20:07.880]  Call and he's made one study.
[20:07.880 --> 20:10.880]  Everyone you know he was staying.
[20:10.880 --> 20:12.880]  Don't sting the heart, McCree.
[20:12.880 --> 20:13.880]  Okay, we're back.
[20:13.880 --> 20:15.880]  Get in your problem, then.
[20:15.880 --> 20:17.880]  Get in your problem, then.
[20:17.880 --> 20:19.880]  We're talking to Mike in Texas.
[20:19.880 --> 20:21.880]  Okay, Mike.
[20:21.880 --> 20:26.880]  What kind of like an update on where we're at?
[20:26.880 --> 20:31.880]  Now, you have a mark you need to meet.
[20:31.880 --> 20:35.880]  When you were prosecuted for that classy misdemeanor,
[20:35.880 --> 20:38.880]  what cost the prosecution $80,000?
[20:38.880 --> 20:44.880]  What have you done to make sure you cost this prosecution even more?
[20:44.880 --> 20:48.880]  Well, actually, not much.
[20:48.880 --> 20:52.880]  I've been, I've have filed a number of things,
[20:52.880 --> 20:55.880]  not nearly to the same volume that I have in the past.
[20:55.880 --> 20:59.880]  I am probably setting a record for a number of pre-trials.
[20:59.880 --> 21:02.880]  They really don't want to go to trial on this,
[21:02.880 --> 21:04.880]  but they don't want to let it go either.
[21:04.880 --> 21:10.880]  So I'm changing tactics now.
[21:10.880 --> 21:13.880]  At the last judicial proceeding,
[21:13.880 --> 21:19.880]  I finally got to a pre-trial where I got in front of the judge
[21:19.880 --> 21:23.880]  and a prosecutor and everyone was present at all in one room,
[21:23.880 --> 21:25.880]  which had taken 11 months.
[21:25.880 --> 21:31.880]  And at that point, the judge decided to limit the pre-trial
[21:31.880 --> 21:35.880]  for just a few minutes for my motions for discovery.
[21:35.880 --> 21:39.880]  So, I mean, I had all these motions,
[21:39.880 --> 21:41.880]  had two motions for discovery.
[21:41.880 --> 21:45.880]  One was written by a former attorney,
[21:45.880 --> 21:48.880]  which I had to have dismissed.
[21:48.880 --> 21:51.880]  He was trying to place mental and competency charges upon me
[21:51.880 --> 21:54.880]  because I was just requesting a bond here.
[21:54.880 --> 21:57.880]  I was never given one.
[21:57.880 --> 22:01.880]  You know, while I was in...
[22:01.880 --> 22:04.880]  Have you filed a bar grievances against him?
[22:04.880 --> 22:05.880]  I filed one.
[22:05.880 --> 22:09.880]  I've got a 30- or 40-page waiting to be filed.
[22:09.880 --> 22:14.880]  You might look at a malpractice suit against him.
[22:14.880 --> 22:18.880]  If not that, at least give him a tort letter.
[22:18.880 --> 22:21.880]  Well, you know, I've got an audio recording of the judge
[22:21.880 --> 22:26.880]  even stating that that attorney had not served me very well.
[22:26.880 --> 22:30.880]  And then when I...
[22:30.880 --> 22:33.880]  Eventually, when I was able to get rid of him
[22:33.880 --> 22:36.880]  and get a new assistance counsel,
[22:36.880 --> 22:39.880]  and the new assistance counsel wasn't performing very well,
[22:39.880 --> 22:43.880]  I made myself lead chair or primary counsel
[22:43.880 --> 22:45.880]  and an assistance counsel.
[22:45.880 --> 22:48.880]  And then the judge started to get a little worried and said,
[22:48.880 --> 22:51.880]  oh, we've got to figure out some way to get the original attorney
[22:51.880 --> 22:52.880]  back on the case.
[22:52.880 --> 22:55.880]  We'll get that on recording, too.
[22:55.880 --> 22:59.880]  So, I mean, that shows a lot of conspiracy
[22:59.880 --> 23:02.880]  and, you know, to contrive
[23:02.880 --> 23:06.880]  and to deprive me of the ability of legal counsel.
[23:06.880 --> 23:09.880]  But one of the questions I was asking on this,
[23:09.880 --> 23:11.880]  after they've been for warrant and arrest of detention,
[23:11.880 --> 23:14.880]  I've got three signatures.
[23:14.880 --> 23:16.880]  Do you have two of the officers in the judge
[23:16.880 --> 23:21.880]  and is that sufficient for RICO?
[23:21.880 --> 23:27.880]  Well, yes, but RICO is really, really hard to prosecute.
[23:27.880 --> 23:29.880]  Okay.
[23:29.880 --> 23:35.880]  You may look at the state street gang statutes.
[23:35.880 --> 23:36.880]  Okay.
[23:36.880 --> 23:40.880]  Because they're all wearing gang colors of uniforms.
[23:40.880 --> 23:41.880]  Okay.
[23:41.880 --> 23:42.880]  Yes, exactly.
[23:42.880 --> 23:45.880]  That's, was it rules?
[23:45.880 --> 23:50.880]  Penal code section 72, I believe,
[23:50.880 --> 23:52.880]  that goes to the street gang statute.
[23:52.880 --> 23:55.880]  And essentially what it says for those who are not familiar with it,
[23:55.880 --> 24:01.880]  it says that it addresses a criminal enterprise
[24:01.880 --> 24:09.880]  that has a recognizable hierarchy
[24:09.880 --> 24:13.880]  and engages in ongoing criminal behavior.
[24:13.880 --> 24:14.880]  And I think it goes through something.
[24:14.880 --> 24:15.880]  They gather together, yeah.
[24:15.880 --> 24:21.880]  They have a recognizable emblem of their gang
[24:21.880 --> 24:26.880]  and they gather together for the purpose of committing criminal acts.
[24:26.880 --> 24:27.880]  Yeah.
[24:27.880 --> 24:30.880]  And it is designed for street gangs,
[24:30.880 --> 24:34.880]  but it fits these guys perfect.
[24:34.880 --> 24:37.880]  But that's a criminal statute.
[24:37.880 --> 24:39.880]  And that would be, you really need to go
[24:39.880 --> 24:43.880]  when this thing in Cherokee County,
[24:43.880 --> 24:48.880]  they just blew off everything until I took the gloves off.
[24:48.880 --> 24:51.880]  And I said, enough of this crepola.
[24:51.880 --> 24:55.880]  I filed a motion to recuse.
[24:55.880 --> 25:00.880]  And everywhere I accused a official of doing something improper,
[25:00.880 --> 25:05.880]  I stated the criminal statute he violated when he did it.
[25:05.880 --> 25:10.880]  It made up a set of criminal complaints for each one of those.
[25:10.880 --> 25:14.880]  I had about 20 class A misdemeanors
[25:14.880 --> 25:17.880]  and about a half a dozen felonies against the judge.
[25:17.880 --> 25:20.880]  And that's when all of a sudden,
[25:20.880 --> 25:24.880]  they wanted all this to go away all of a sudden.
[25:24.880 --> 25:25.880]  That's how my criminal,
[25:25.880 --> 25:27.880]  I'm wording my current criminal complaints
[25:27.880 --> 25:29.880]  as I'm doing them a little bit differently.
[25:29.880 --> 25:32.880]  Because I'm a, I get very limited voice.
[25:32.880 --> 25:34.880]  So I'm stating what they did
[25:34.880 --> 25:37.880]  and I'm stating in the criminal complaint,
[25:37.880 --> 25:40.880]  the appeal code and what they did
[25:40.880 --> 25:44.880]  and the offenses and what the potential crime is
[25:44.880 --> 25:46.880]  to just hammer home the point
[25:46.880 --> 25:49.880]  and to make it very easy for someone to count.
[25:49.880 --> 25:51.880]  There's this many felonies of class B,
[25:51.880 --> 25:53.880]  this many class C felonies,
[25:53.880 --> 25:55.880]  this many class A misdemeanors
[25:55.880 --> 25:58.880]  so they can easily tell you the number of counts
[25:58.880 --> 26:01.880]  of the two different charges
[26:01.880 --> 26:05.880]  rather than putting limited to just a narrative.
[26:05.880 --> 26:09.880]  I don't know if that's a good idea or not, but...
[26:09.880 --> 26:11.880]  Well, that, yeah, each,
[26:11.880 --> 26:15.880]  you want one statement of facts
[26:15.880 --> 26:18.880]  as a verified affidavit
[26:18.880 --> 26:24.880]  and then a separate criminal complaint for every count.
[26:24.880 --> 26:27.880]  And I generally,
[26:27.880 --> 26:29.880]  when I write the complaint,
[26:29.880 --> 26:32.880]  I will go to my narrative
[26:32.880 --> 26:35.880]  and select a portion of the narrative
[26:35.880 --> 26:38.880]  that goes to this particular accusation
[26:38.880 --> 26:43.880]  and then make reference to the full statement of facts
[26:43.880 --> 26:46.880]  so that when they each complaint,
[26:46.880 --> 26:50.880]  they wind up reading the same things over and over,
[26:50.880 --> 26:54.880]  something about the human mind.
[26:54.880 --> 26:56.880]  The more it hears something,
[26:56.880 --> 26:59.880]  the more truthful it becomes,
[26:59.880 --> 27:04.880]  whether it is or not.
[27:04.880 --> 27:07.880]  So that's what they're doing to me.
[27:07.880 --> 27:11.880]  I mean, all their criminal complaints look almost identical.
[27:11.880 --> 27:15.880]  They were definitely working off each other's complaints.
[27:15.880 --> 27:18.880]  They had some master they were working from,
[27:18.880 --> 27:21.880]  but it doesn't match the video.
[27:21.880 --> 27:24.880]  So I think they had a problem.
[27:24.880 --> 27:30.880]  That should get aggravated perjury charges against.
[27:30.880 --> 27:33.880]  Yes, I'm putting aggravated perjury charges
[27:33.880 --> 27:37.880]  as part of the criminal complaint.
[27:37.880 --> 27:41.880]  So there's a pretty significant number of aggravated perjury counts
[27:41.880 --> 27:45.880]  I can go through on each affidavit.
[27:45.880 --> 27:50.880]  That should bring you to aggravated assault.
[27:50.880 --> 27:55.880]  And that's why I've aggravated assault and their official oppression.
[27:55.880 --> 27:57.880]  No, no, no, wait, hold on, hold on.
[27:57.880 --> 28:00.880]  We don't want to go to official oppression here.
[28:00.880 --> 28:03.880]  As far as the arrest and the assault,
[28:03.880 --> 28:06.880]  you see that's where the prosecutor wants to prosecute these guys
[28:06.880 --> 28:09.880]  under official oppression.
[28:09.880 --> 28:13.880]  This is first degree felony aggravated assault.
[28:13.880 --> 28:17.880]  It is a special statute.
[28:17.880 --> 28:22.880]  It has never been used.
[28:22.880 --> 28:24.880]  It's 22.
[28:24.880 --> 28:27.880]  It's never been used against a law enforcement officer.
[28:27.880 --> 28:32.880]  This particular portion of the statute.
[28:32.880 --> 28:34.880]  What is it?
[28:34.880 --> 28:42.880]  20.02 B2A.
[28:42.880 --> 28:47.880]  It's B2A and B2B.
[28:47.880 --> 28:54.880]  B2B goes to anyone committing assault against a public official
[28:54.880 --> 29:00.880]  while the official's acting under his authority.
[29:00.880 --> 29:03.880]  That's a first degree felony.
[29:03.880 --> 29:10.880]  Now, when I ran Lexis on that one, I got thousands of hints.
[29:10.880 --> 29:19.880]  But B2A is an act of a public official committing assault
[29:19.880 --> 29:23.880]  while displaying a deadly weapon.
[29:23.880 --> 29:28.880]  That is a specific statute.
[29:28.880 --> 29:32.880]  When the public official is acting under the color of his authority
[29:32.880 --> 29:35.880]  and commits aggravated assault,
[29:35.880 --> 29:40.880]  the first degree felony, that's exactly what he has to do.
[29:40.880 --> 29:43.880]  A special statute to address that.
[29:43.880 --> 29:48.880]  This will put fear of God in him to a certain extent.
[29:48.880 --> 29:50.880]  This is Randy Kelk.
[29:50.880 --> 29:52.880]  We'll do the radio.
[29:52.880 --> 29:59.880]  We'll do it right back on the other side.
[29:59.880 --> 30:04.880]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[30:04.880 --> 30:06.880]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:06.880 --> 30:11.880]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:11.880 --> 30:14.880]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:14.880 --> 30:17.880]  And thousands of my fellow force responders are playing.
[30:17.880 --> 30:18.880]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:18.880 --> 30:19.880]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:19.880 --> 30:21.880]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[30:21.880 --> 30:22.880]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:22.880 --> 30:23.880]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:23.880 --> 30:26.880]  We are Americans and we deserve the truth.
[30:26.880 --> 30:29.880]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:29.880 --> 30:35.880]  Could you get hooked on your tanning salon?
[30:35.880 --> 30:37.880]  A new study suggests so.
[30:37.880 --> 30:40.880]  In fact, researchers say tanning may be as addictive as drugs.
[30:40.880 --> 30:45.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll have the not-so-sunny details in a moment.
[30:45.880 --> 30:47.880]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:47.880 --> 30:51.880]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:51.880 --> 30:55.880]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:55.880 --> 31:01.880]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[31:01.880 --> 31:03.880]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[31:03.880 --> 31:07.880]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com.
[31:07.880 --> 31:11.880]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[31:11.880 --> 31:14.880]  Start over with StartPage.
[31:14.880 --> 31:19.880]  Despite the risk of skin cancer, a million Americans use tanning salons every day.
[31:19.880 --> 31:24.880]  They say they're after that cool, bronzed look, but could their motivation be more than skin deep?
[31:24.880 --> 31:30.880]  A new study in Texas finds the real appeal may not be golden skin, but rather ultraviolet radiation,
[31:30.880 --> 31:33.880]  which scientists say may be as addictive as drugs.
[31:33.880 --> 31:39.880]  When habitual tanners receive the UV light from a tanning session, the addiction areas of their brains light up.
[31:39.880 --> 31:45.880]  But when those UV rays are secretly filtered out, they experience cravings and withdrawal symptoms.
[31:45.880 --> 31:49.880]  Maybe tanning booths are the opium dens of the 21st century.
[31:49.880 --> 31:54.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:20.880 --> 32:26.880]  Yeah, I won't
[32:28.880 --> 32:30.880]  go, I won't
[32:31.880 --> 32:37.880]  I won't let you pull the wall over my eyes
[32:39.880 --> 32:45.880]  They must refuse your news or so come in line
[32:45.880 --> 32:53.880]  This seems you like the best, but please take some words to the wise
[32:53.880 --> 32:55.880]  Okay, we're back.
[32:55.880 --> 32:58.880]  We're in Calcun, those things don't bring people a radio.
[32:58.880 --> 33:03.880]  Because of the mic in Texas, Mike, we have anything else for us?
[33:03.880 --> 33:05.880]  No, that's about all. I don't want to.
[33:05.880 --> 33:07.880]  I don't think it's too much of other people's time.
[33:07.880 --> 33:11.880]  Okay, yeah, if you do, I'll stick Gabber on you.
[33:11.880 --> 33:13.880]  That'll break your fucking eggs, Bubba.
[33:13.880 --> 33:18.880]  Okay, thanks, Mike.
[33:18.880 --> 33:19.880]  I'm glad you called in.
[33:19.880 --> 33:21.880]  It's nice to hear what's going on.
[33:21.880 --> 33:25.880]  And I'm looking forward to you kicking their behinds.
[33:25.880 --> 33:29.880]  Okay, we're going to go to Kyle in Texas.
[33:29.880 --> 33:32.880]  Is that Kyle or Kylie?
[33:32.880 --> 33:34.880]  Hello, can you hear me?
[33:34.880 --> 33:36.880]  Yes.
[33:36.880 --> 33:38.880]  Wow.
[33:38.880 --> 33:43.880]  Yeah, it's...
[33:43.880 --> 33:52.880]  Whenever I talk to somebody about this, they open their eyes and it's truly amazing.
[33:52.880 --> 34:00.880]  The one thing that Christ got upset about was the money changers being in a church.
[34:00.880 --> 34:10.880]  And 501c3 tells the church is what they cannot do. You're serving two masters.
[34:10.880 --> 34:25.880]  And what they don't realize is in numerology, 501c3 is in Revelation chapter 13.
[34:25.880 --> 34:30.880]  It says, count the number of the beast or the number in his name.
[34:30.880 --> 34:33.880]  501c3.
[34:33.880 --> 34:35.880]  5 plus 1 is 6.
[34:35.880 --> 34:38.880]  The C stands for count 30.
[34:38.880 --> 34:41.880]  6, 6, 6.
[34:41.880 --> 34:52.880]  It upsets me quite a bit how the churches that call themselves Christian
[34:52.880 --> 34:58.880]  have allowed themselves to have the beast tell them what they can and cannot do.
[34:58.880 --> 35:05.880]  Whoa, hold on here. That is a very large leap.
[35:05.880 --> 35:13.880]  That sounds like specious logic.
[35:13.880 --> 35:16.880]  Logic based on false premise.
[35:16.880 --> 35:22.880]  Specious logic based on false...
[35:22.880 --> 35:27.880]  In order to be tax free, do you know about 501c3?
[35:27.880 --> 35:30.880]  501c3.
[35:30.880 --> 35:34.880]  501c3.
[35:34.880 --> 35:38.880]  In order to be tax free, they...
[35:38.880 --> 35:44.880]  Oh, okay. You're talking about the four churches. Yeah, I'm familiar with that.
[35:44.880 --> 35:52.880]  Okay, and you're doing some numerology on the numbering system?
[35:52.880 --> 35:55.880]  Yeah, in order...
[35:55.880 --> 36:00.880]  They don't come out and say here, come and support me, 6, 6, 6.
[36:00.880 --> 36:09.880]  The numerology and the science of it and the worship of it, they hide things.
[36:09.880 --> 36:11.880]  501c3.
[36:11.880 --> 36:16.880]  Okay, what are you saying? You got to the mark of the beast.
[36:16.880 --> 36:21.880]  How did you get to the mark of the beast from 501c3?
[36:21.880 --> 36:30.880]  Well, if you have anything telling the churches what they can and cannot do,
[36:30.880 --> 36:33.880]  you're serving another master.
[36:33.880 --> 36:38.880]  Okay, there was an unstated presupposition in your logic.
[36:38.880 --> 36:47.880]  So if anyone tells the church what to do, then the church is necessarily serving another master.
[36:47.880 --> 36:49.880]  Exactly.
[36:49.880 --> 36:53.880]  That is an overblown statement.
[36:53.880 --> 37:02.880]  If the government said, we have a major hurricane coming in,
[37:02.880 --> 37:07.880]  and you can't hold church services here this Sunday, you got to go somewhere else.
[37:07.880 --> 37:12.880]  So everybody doesn't get wiped out. Are they serving another master?
[37:12.880 --> 37:17.880]  Okay, obviously you don't understand all the things that...
[37:17.880 --> 37:23.880]  I understand pretty good. You're making an overgeneralization.
[37:23.880 --> 37:33.880]  What specific things would the church have to do in order to serve another master?
[37:33.880 --> 37:39.880]  In this case, it would be maintaining its status first as a church of God rather than a church of government,
[37:39.880 --> 37:44.880]  and it would also be to the business of the church in general.
[37:44.880 --> 37:50.880]  Basically, they tell the pastor and the church what they can and cannot preach on via subject matter.
[37:50.880 --> 37:53.880]  Now, there we go.
[37:53.880 --> 38:01.880]  There, that particular issue, then I would accept the logic.
[38:01.880 --> 38:05.880]  But just the general statement, if anyone tells the church anything,
[38:05.880 --> 38:10.880]  then they're serving another master. That's why it's going to species logic.
[38:10.880 --> 38:23.880]  But you made some remarks about the mark of the beast and a numerological observation.
[38:23.880 --> 38:26.880]  How did you get there?
[38:26.880 --> 38:31.880]  Well, I'm just glad I set the seed for people that are listening.
[38:31.880 --> 38:38.880]  If they knew their rules about 501c and what churches can and cannot do,
[38:38.880 --> 38:45.880]  it's going to get worse just like it did.
[38:45.880 --> 38:54.880]  What are the kinds of things that 501c prevents them from doing?
[38:54.880 --> 39:02.880]  Just like, see, right now, if 501c3 was back 200 years ago, it would be illegal.
[39:02.880 --> 39:09.880]  They can't come together and organize themselves.
[39:09.880 --> 39:29.880]  For instance, anybody of a state official cannot come in and talk about organizing and coming together
[39:29.880 --> 39:37.880]  and do what they did like, for instance, 200 years ago.
[39:37.880 --> 39:40.880]  This is the main thing that...
[39:40.880 --> 39:43.880]  Wait a minute. I don't know what you're talking about here.
[39:43.880 --> 39:53.880]  Can you come together and organize saying, we need to do this or that?
[39:53.880 --> 40:03.880]  That's the main thing that the government doesn't want to do against those that want to...
[40:03.880 --> 40:07.880]  Wait a minute. I'm not understanding what you're saying here.
[40:07.880 --> 40:16.880]  You're saying that a government official can't give any direction to the church.
[40:16.880 --> 40:20.880]  Exactly. And that's what 501c3 is.
[40:20.880 --> 40:24.880]  If you study it and understand that it's the number one...
[40:24.880 --> 40:29.880]  Okay, so you're saying any direction at all.
[40:29.880 --> 40:34.880]  Up until the render unto Caesar.
[40:34.880 --> 40:41.880]  In a sense, they're saying abide by the local laws.
[40:41.880 --> 40:54.880]  You're saying if a local law has the appearance of conflicting with any desire of the church,
[40:54.880 --> 41:03.880]  they haven't made the distinction between the church's business as it relates to religion
[41:03.880 --> 41:12.880]  to how it relates to dealing in the public, like the strawman.
[41:12.880 --> 41:23.880]  So you're saying that any dealings of the church are absolutely taboo for the government to have any business with.
[41:23.880 --> 41:27.880]  Exactly. That's what a part of that...
[41:27.880 --> 41:30.880]  It's not a law. It's a rule.
[41:30.880 --> 41:36.880]  In fact, in New England, there was a $7 million cure to it.
[41:36.880 --> 41:42.880]  It said, oh my God, look what we're doing. We're serving two masters.
[41:42.880 --> 41:46.880]  They tried to get it out of 501c3.
[41:46.880 --> 41:50.880]  You know what they turned it into? The Planned Parenthood.
[41:50.880 --> 41:55.880]  It was a New England. It was a $7 million complex.
[41:55.880 --> 42:08.880]  And this is what is so evil is that the government is telling the churches what they can and cannot do.
[42:08.880 --> 42:11.880]  This is what I'm trying to get to in what context.
[42:11.880 --> 42:21.880]  I don't think the government is coming in there and telling them how to worship or who to worship.
[42:21.880 --> 42:37.880]  Well, actually, in a way they are. What 501c3 is doing is it's stating that the church cannot basically use any portion of the Bible that talks about not being homosexual,
[42:37.880 --> 42:44.880]  not being this, that or the other, anything that would go against the freedom of choice versus the freedom of religion issue.
[42:44.880 --> 42:54.880]  They don't want you to preach against abortion. They don't want you preaching against any of the things the Bible calls an abomination or a sinful act.
[42:54.880 --> 42:57.880]  Okay. That's what I was trying to get to.
[42:57.880 --> 43:03.880]  In that context, I absolutely agree with you 100%.
[43:03.880 --> 43:08.880]  Okay. That is absolutely an intrusion.
[43:08.880 --> 43:18.880]  I didn't mean to be difficult. I wanted to get to what was really the issue as opposed to the implication it gave.
[43:18.880 --> 43:30.880]  The other thing is that you can't get your state representative and the church to come together like it did 200 years ago in the American Revolution.
[43:30.880 --> 43:33.880]  You can't do that anymore.
[43:33.880 --> 43:41.880]  I know. I was aware of those things. I wanted to bring it out so that it made sense exactly where we're going.
[43:41.880 --> 43:45.880]  We'll finish this up on the other side. This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stephen, David Craig.
[43:45.880 --> 43:47.880]  We live on the radio.
[43:47.880 --> 43:52.880]  Our call in number is 512-646-1984.
[43:52.880 --> 43:59.880]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[43:59.880 --> 44:03.880]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.880 --> 44:06.880]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[44:06.880 --> 44:14.880]  The affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:14.880 --> 44:18.880]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.880 --> 44:22.880]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.880 --> 44:27.880]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.880 --> 44:33.880]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:33.880 --> 44:42.880]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.880 --> 44:51.880]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[44:51.880 --> 45:00.880]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.880 --> 45:04.880]  The Oklahoma City Bombing, top 10 reasons to question the official story.
[45:04.880 --> 45:08.880]  Reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices.
[45:08.880 --> 45:16.880]  On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the writer truck report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators.
[45:16.880 --> 45:24.880]  The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone delivered the writer truck bomb to the Murra Building and detonated it.
[45:24.880 --> 45:32.880]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley, who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing,
[45:32.880 --> 45:38.880]  testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fable John Doe number two, exiting the writer truck.
[45:38.880 --> 45:49.880]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing, no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing,
[45:49.880 --> 45:56.880]  including when he rented the writer truck, and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:56.880 --> 46:13.880]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:26.880 --> 46:34.880]  What I'm wishing for, when I'm hungry, I like to know just what I'm fishing for.
[46:34.880 --> 46:45.880]  I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton. I'm just here making my living, pushing buttons.
[46:45.880 --> 46:57.880]  I give my message out to anyone in the shout and distance. I hope for bravery and against slavery showing resistance.
[46:57.880 --> 47:10.880]  First I'm crawling, then I'm walking, then I start strutting. I'm just so glad to make my living, pushing buttons.
[47:10.880 --> 47:15.880]  Now Randy is going to jump in there and get out.
[47:15.880 --> 47:21.880]  I was waiting for the buffer music to drop down, but it's been holding up a bit.
[47:21.880 --> 47:25.880]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, David Stevens and Craig with the radio.
[47:25.880 --> 47:35.880]  And I hope I didn't push a bunch of buttons on that last segment. I wasn't trying to give the caller a difficult time.
[47:35.880 --> 47:46.880]  But what I am interested in is that we are careful to always act from a consistent set of beliefs.
[47:46.880 --> 47:57.880]  And anytime I come across what appear to be vague generalities, I tend to want to develop more specificity.
[47:57.880 --> 48:09.880]  I knew what answer I wanted and then he finally jumped in and gave it to me. Just so you know, I already understood that issue.
[48:09.880 --> 48:15.880]  It just the way it was presented would tend to distort the issue.
[48:15.880 --> 48:24.880]  And I was just trying to get back to a good effect of thinking. We have to be real careful about what we let in there.
[48:24.880 --> 48:34.880]  Anyway, okay, enough of that. And if any questions are offended at me, I apologize, it's certainly my arguments had nothing to do with religion at all.
[48:34.880 --> 48:38.880]  It nearly had to do with how we think about what we think about.
[48:38.880 --> 48:43.880]  Okay, with that said, we're going to go to Mike in Texas.
[48:43.880 --> 48:45.880]  Mike, what do you have for us tonight?
[48:45.880 --> 48:48.880]  Hi, Randy. How are you doing, buddy?
[48:48.880 --> 48:49.880]  Good.
[48:49.880 --> 48:51.880]  Good. Can you hear me all right?
[48:51.880 --> 48:53.880]  No, I can't hear a word you're saying.
[48:53.880 --> 48:58.880]  Okay, good. That means it's working.
[48:58.880 --> 49:05.880]  I've just been listening to you guys for a few weeks and so I figured I'd call in.
[49:05.880 --> 49:15.880]  I have decided to take on a debt collector and I had a question and then I also had a question for Eddie.
[49:15.880 --> 49:26.880]  Let me hit you, Randy, with this question. I'm sure you're familiar with the FDCPA Section 809 Validation of Debt.
[49:26.880 --> 49:35.880]  Yes, sir. I don't know why they use that 809. It's 15 USC 1692G.
[49:35.880 --> 49:42.880]  Hey, man, you got a mind like a sharpest attack, don't you?
[49:42.880 --> 49:51.880]  Well, everybody says that I remind them of a burned out life, not very bright at all.
[49:51.880 --> 49:59.880]  No, I don't believe that for a minute. I guess I've only been listening for a little while and I figured out you're a pretty smart fella.
[49:59.880 --> 50:08.880]  My question goes to this. The very first paragraph of that section says that within five days after the initial communication with a consumer,
[50:08.880 --> 50:14.880]  which would be me, the connection with a collection of any debt that a debt collector shall,
[50:14.880 --> 50:21.880]  unless the following information is contained in the initial communication or the consumer has paid the debt,
[50:21.880 --> 50:25.880]  send the consumer a written notice containing blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
[50:25.880 --> 50:31.880]  Now, I haven't received any communication from said collector.
[50:31.880 --> 50:40.880]  I was rooting around in my own credit report and came across somebody who's reporting something in my credit report that I wanted to dispute.
[50:40.880 --> 50:51.880]  So I sent them a debt validation letter. Now, would that be considered initial communication?
[50:51.880 --> 50:53.880]  Absolutely.
[50:53.880 --> 50:59.880]  Okay. I didn't know if I had to wait for them to send me something or if I could.
[50:59.880 --> 51:02.880]  No, you can initialize.
[51:02.880 --> 51:10.880]  You actually, when it goes to debt validation, you initialize the communication with the dispute demand.
[51:10.880 --> 51:23.880]  Now, okay, let's break this apart into pieces to whom did you send the debt validation letter to the entity,
[51:23.880 --> 51:33.880]  the individual making the claim or to the alleged principal holder of the note?
[51:33.880 --> 51:37.880]  To the one who's making the claim in my credit report.
[51:37.880 --> 51:41.880]  Good. Okay. Let me make sure I've got this right.
[51:41.880 --> 51:47.880]  Generally, we'll have a law firm send out the letter.
[51:47.880 --> 51:58.880]  Do you send the debt validation letter to the law firm or to the alleged principal that the law firm was acting as an agent for?
[51:58.880 --> 52:05.880]  Neither. The debt collector, we'll just call them ABC debt collector.
[52:05.880 --> 52:10.880]  They're not claiming to be an attorney. I did a little research on them on the internet.
[52:10.880 --> 52:15.880]  They're just a debt collector that bought some charged off debt as well.
[52:15.880 --> 52:20.880]  Great. Great. Okay. That's perfect. Then you got the right one.
[52:20.880 --> 52:31.880]  Okay. Whoever is actually making the claim, it will either be a third party debt collector making the claim personally.
[52:31.880 --> 52:39.880]  It'll be the originator of the obligation making the claim personally.
[52:39.880 --> 52:48.880]  Or it will be an entity making the claim as an agent for either one of those other two.
[52:48.880 --> 52:55.880]  And always the one we want to go after is the one who's actually making the claim.
[52:55.880 --> 52:57.880]  Right.
[52:57.880 --> 53:07.880]  Because there's always, there's a presumption here that it's hard for people to get their heads wrapped around.
[53:07.880 --> 53:12.880]  You have someone making a claim, a presentation.
[53:12.880 --> 53:16.880]  The Uniform Commercial Code calls this a presentment.
[53:16.880 --> 53:17.880]  Okay.
[53:17.880 --> 53:22.880]  Present you with a demand for payment.
[53:22.880 --> 53:25.880]  And you know you have, you have incurred this debt.
[53:25.880 --> 53:30.880]  So you start presuming all sorts of stuff.
[53:30.880 --> 53:31.880]  Right.
[53:31.880 --> 53:36.880]  Well, we're trying to get people to back up and say, wait a minute.
[53:36.880 --> 53:39.880]  You think you know who this person is.
[53:39.880 --> 53:43.880]  You think you know what debt he's collecting.
[53:43.880 --> 53:49.880]  Maybe that's the one he's collecting on the one you think it is and maybe it's not.
[53:49.880 --> 53:55.880]  He may be actually be collecting a debt that don't have anything to do with you.
[53:55.880 --> 53:56.880]  Right.
[53:56.880 --> 54:00.880]  And he accidentally got your address and your name.
[54:00.880 --> 54:02.880]  He's got these things all mixed up.
[54:02.880 --> 54:05.880]  But that's what debt validation letters about.
[54:05.880 --> 54:08.880]  Because there is such a mess out there.
[54:08.880 --> 54:09.880]  Right.
[54:09.880 --> 54:12.880]  With the way these guys have handled it.
[54:12.880 --> 54:15.880]  First thing, stipulate to nothing.
[54:15.880 --> 54:16.880]  What debt?
[54:16.880 --> 54:18.880]  I don't know anything about debt.
[54:18.880 --> 54:24.880]  I don't know anything about a debt until you have conclusively proved that one exists.
[54:24.880 --> 54:25.880]  Right.
[54:25.880 --> 54:27.880]  So that's what that, that foundation letter is.
[54:27.880 --> 54:37.880]  We send a letter to each of the credit reporting agencies directing them to remove any references
[54:37.880 --> 54:41.880]  from this particular entity on your credit report.
[54:41.880 --> 54:42.880]  Yes.
[54:42.880 --> 54:49.880]  He's in two of the three credit reports and I sent dispute letters to the Bureau's TransUnion
[54:49.880 --> 54:55.880]  and Experian mentioning this collector by name saying that I dispute this.
[54:55.880 --> 54:56.880]  I don't know anything about it.
[54:56.880 --> 55:00.880]  I want you to do an investigation.
[55:00.880 --> 55:02.880]  Did you get a response from them?
[55:02.880 --> 55:03.880]  No.
[55:03.880 --> 55:09.880]  I just sent those out this week and I know it can take like 30 days, maybe 45 days before
[55:09.880 --> 55:10.880]  they respond.
[55:10.880 --> 55:11.880]  Okay.
[55:11.880 --> 55:17.880]  Now here, this is an important place we need to go to that we seldom do.
[55:17.880 --> 55:18.880]  Okay.
[55:18.880 --> 55:22.880]  And that is remedy.
[55:22.880 --> 55:31.880]  We have a lot of laws, rules, statutes that the lender can breach.
[55:31.880 --> 55:32.880]  Right.
[55:32.880 --> 55:39.880]  But that's not so important as the remedy.
[55:39.880 --> 55:42.880]  What's the remedy?
[55:42.880 --> 55:47.880]  There are things that the lender can do wrong that there is no remedy for.
[55:47.880 --> 55:55.880]  One thing, if you can't, if they do something wrong, the first question is, okay, they did
[55:55.880 --> 55:56.880]  this thing wrong.
[55:56.880 --> 55:58.880]  How was I harmed?
[55:58.880 --> 55:59.880]  Right.
[55:59.880 --> 56:01.880]  And what is my source of remedy?
[56:01.880 --> 56:04.880]  Is there a statutory remedy?
[56:04.880 --> 56:09.880]  Generally in the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, there is a statutory remedy.
[56:09.880 --> 56:16.880]  A violation of the act is designated as a civil rights violation.
[56:16.880 --> 56:17.880]  Right.
[56:17.880 --> 56:18.880]  Hence the USC.
[56:18.880 --> 56:19.880]  Yeah.
[56:19.880 --> 56:25.480]  Or civil rights violation is a, it's harm on its face.
[56:25.480 --> 56:27.880]  It's harm per se.
[56:27.880 --> 56:31.880]  So you don't have to show harm.
[56:31.880 --> 56:42.000]  So there, your remedy is a suit for violation error, but there could be more remedy.
[56:42.000 --> 56:51.600]  If you were actually harmed, for instance, you send a debt validation letter and while
[56:51.600 --> 56:59.680]  you're waiting, they've got these marks on your credit and you go down to a bank and
[56:59.680 --> 57:05.680]  say, I want to get a loan to pay this off and I want some extra money to boot to stick
[57:05.680 --> 57:07.180]  in my pocket.
[57:07.180 --> 57:12.400]  I want you to give me this loan for more money than they will be willing to give you.
[57:12.400 --> 57:13.400]  Yeah.
[57:13.400 --> 57:16.400]  And then they're going to go look at your credit report and they're going to come back
[57:16.400 --> 57:20.800]  and say, look, you guys do these marks on your credit.
[57:20.800 --> 57:24.000]  And because of these marks on your credit, we can't give you this loan.
[57:24.000 --> 57:25.560]  That established harm.
[57:25.560 --> 57:26.560]  Ta-da.
[57:26.560 --> 57:33.200]  You have been harmed by denial of credit and that is a cause of action.
[57:33.200 --> 57:34.200]  Right.
[57:34.200 --> 57:38.960]  You've been harmed by the amount of credit you were denied.
[57:38.960 --> 57:50.800]  So trans union or Equifax or Experian putting this mark on your credit, that's not, they're
[57:50.800 --> 57:53.200]  not violating fair debt clearance practice.
[57:53.200 --> 57:54.200]  No.
[57:54.200 --> 57:55.200]  No.
[57:55.200 --> 57:56.200]  It's the creditor.
[57:56.200 --> 57:57.200]  Yeah.
[57:57.200 --> 57:59.920]  So you don't have that direct remedy against them.
[57:59.920 --> 58:00.920]  Yeah, they did this.
[58:00.920 --> 58:01.920]  It shouldn't have done it.
[58:01.920 --> 58:06.720]  Now you've got to claim against the creditor, but not against these guys.
[58:06.720 --> 58:13.320]  But if you get harmed because that's all there, and it shouldn't have been, now you've got
[58:13.320 --> 58:21.400]  to claim against these guys and claim for the amount of credit you were denied.
[58:21.400 --> 58:22.400]  Add up to the stakes a little bit.
[58:22.400 --> 58:23.400]  This is Redford Kelfman.
[58:23.400 --> 58:24.400]  You've been plagued by radio.
[58:24.400 --> 58:25.400]  All right.
[58:25.400 --> 58:26.400]  Hang on, Mike.
[58:26.400 --> 58:27.400]  All right.
[58:27.400 --> 58:28.400]  Grant, Lynn, we see you down there.
[58:28.400 --> 58:33.400]  We'll get to you on the other side.
[58:33.400 --> 58:42.000]  If you have a question or comment, give us a call, 512-646-1984, we're going into our
[58:42.000 --> 58:44.200]  third hour.
[58:44.200 --> 58:48.600]  So call in early so you can get in line so you can get to it.
[58:48.600 --> 59:00.280]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[59:00.280 --> 59:05.720]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[59:05.720 --> 59:08.520]  because they struggle to understand it.
[59:08.520 --> 59:13.920]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:13.920 --> 59:17.160]  the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:17.160 --> 59:18.880]  Here's the recovery version.
[59:18.880 --> 59:24.840]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:24.840 --> 59:28.560]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:28.560 --> 59:33.560]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:33.560 --> 59:38.280]  into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:38.280 --> 59:43.440]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:43.440 --> 59:53.840]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:53.840 --> 59:57.920]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:57.920 --> 59:59.920]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:59.920 --> 01:00:04.720]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Network.
[01:00:04.720 --> 01:00:10.680]  Clash is raged in Cairo Friday after a bloodied protestor said he'd been arrested and beaten
[01:00:10.680 --> 01:00:14.000]  up by soldiers near Tahir Square.
[01:00:14.000 --> 01:00:19.360]  Activists occupying an area in front of the cabinet office began throwing stones at soldiers.
[01:00:19.360 --> 01:00:24.480]  Troops responded by firing shots in the air and using water cannons before throwing stones
[01:00:24.480 --> 01:00:30.200]  back at demonstrators from the roof of the nearby parliament building.
[01:00:30.200 --> 01:00:36.080]  Pakistanian-American businessman Mansour Ijaz told the U.K. Independent Thursday Pakistan's
[01:00:36.080 --> 01:00:42.440]  ISI spy chief Lieutenant General Ahmad Suja Pasha visited Arab countries for discussions
[01:00:42.440 --> 01:00:45.400]  on a possible coup by the Pakistan Army.
[01:00:45.400 --> 01:00:50.760]  Ijaz had claimed earlier the S-wing of the ISI was not under the control of the Pakistan
[01:00:50.760 --> 01:00:55.760]  government and that the army used it to influence the Afghanistan government through the terrorist
[01:00:55.760 --> 01:00:58.760]  Haqqani network.
[01:00:58.760 --> 01:01:03.720]  An independent commission in the Netherlands charged Friday 10,000 to 20,000 children were
[01:01:03.720 --> 01:01:09.720]  sexually abused in Catholic institutions and church officials failed to adequately address
[01:01:09.720 --> 01:01:12.240]  the abuse or help the victims.
[01:01:12.240 --> 01:01:17.240]  The commission said Catholic officials failed to tackle the widespread abuse, quote, to
[01:01:17.240 --> 01:01:18.760]  prevent scandals.
[01:01:18.760 --> 01:01:24.320]  It estimated that one in 10 Catholic children suffered some form of abuse, including rape
[01:01:24.320 --> 01:01:27.440]  since 1945.
[01:01:27.440 --> 01:01:33.000]  Bloomberg News reported Thursday lingerie maker Victoria Secret uses cotton picked by child
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:35.640]  laborers in Burkina Faso.
[01:01:35.640 --> 01:01:40.040]  Children as young as 10 are made to work cotton fields in the West African country under a
[01:01:40.040 --> 01:01:43.200]  supposedly fair trade organic cotton program.
[01:01:43.200 --> 01:01:47.880]  The child picks cotton ends up in the supply chain running through India and Sri Lanka
[01:01:47.880 --> 01:01:51.080]  and ultimately to Victoria's Secret in the U.S.
[01:01:51.080 --> 01:01:55.760]  Clarisse Cambiri, a 13-year-old girl, told Bloomberg she was pulled out of school by
[01:01:55.760 --> 01:01:58.440]  an older cousin to work the fields.
[01:01:58.440 --> 01:02:03.080]  She picks cotton and carries manure buckets from dawn till dusk under the constant threat
[01:02:03.080 --> 01:02:04.080]  of violence.
[01:02:04.080 --> 01:02:08.320]  However, the fair trade system is built on the notion that purchases by companies and
[01:02:08.320 --> 01:02:13.640]  consumers won't make them accomplices to exploitation, especially of children.
[01:02:13.640 --> 01:02:22.480]  The global fair trade market grew 27% in just one year to more than $5.8 billion in 2010.
[01:02:22.480 --> 01:02:28.880]  The U.S. Conference of Mayors 2011 Hunger and Homelessness Survey released Thursday finds
[01:02:28.880 --> 01:02:33.560]  a growing number of U.S. families are struggling to put food on the table.
[01:02:33.560 --> 01:02:39.360]  All but four of the 29 cities surveyed reported increased requests for emergency food assistance
[01:02:39.360 --> 01:02:43.440]  between September 2010 and August 2011.
[01:02:43.440 --> 01:02:51.080]  Half were people and families, 26% were employed, 19% were elderly, and 11% were homeless.
[01:02:51.080 --> 01:02:55.440]  Only 27% of those looking for food assistance did not receive it.
[01:02:55.440 --> 01:03:00.040]  According to government data, a record 49 million Americans were living in poverty in
[01:03:00.040 --> 01:03:08.040]  2010, and the number of households, depending on food stamps, soared 16% to 13.6 million.
[01:03:08.040 --> 01:03:36.520]  For more details on this story, visit INF World Report dot com.
[01:03:36.520 --> 01:03:55.680]  We are back, we are talking to Mike in Texas, and where were we Mike, did you have another
[01:03:55.680 --> 01:03:56.680]  question?
[01:03:56.680 --> 01:04:03.600]  I had a follow-up, if I send them the validation letter and they don't respond to me within
[01:04:03.600 --> 01:04:10.160]  that five-day period, is that an automatic violation?
[01:04:10.160 --> 01:04:17.400]  It is an automatic violation, and they are subject to statutory estoppel.
[01:04:17.400 --> 01:04:20.120]  That means they have to stop collecting the debt?
[01:04:20.120 --> 01:04:21.120]  Yes.
[01:04:21.120 --> 01:04:25.040]  Okay, and that means they have to get out of my credit report or they just have to market
[01:04:25.040 --> 01:04:26.040]  as in dispute?
[01:04:26.040 --> 01:04:31.120]  They have to market as in dispute, and that has the effect of taking it out of your credit
[01:04:31.120 --> 01:04:32.120]  point.
[01:04:32.120 --> 01:04:37.400]  I had done that because I checked, I know when they got served because I did it all certified
[01:04:37.400 --> 01:04:44.000]  mail, and then I got my credit report again and checked it, and it is marked in dispute,
[01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:49.720]  so I can't give them for that, but they have not responded to me personally.
[01:04:49.720 --> 01:04:53.920]  Have they made any attempt to collect the debt?
[01:04:53.920 --> 01:04:55.400]  No, they haven't.
[01:04:55.400 --> 01:05:01.120]  Oh, this is, we maybe actually have somebody who's read the book.
[01:05:01.120 --> 01:05:04.760]  Well, like I said, they never sent me anything.
[01:05:04.760 --> 01:05:10.200]  I found them in my credit report and sent them the validation letter, they have yet to respond
[01:05:10.200 --> 01:05:12.640]  to me, but they have marked it in dispute.
[01:05:12.640 --> 01:05:18.160]  Oh, okay, so they've made no attempt to collect the debt?
[01:05:18.160 --> 01:05:19.160]  No.
[01:05:19.160 --> 01:05:23.080]  But they're still reporting in my credit bureaus?
[01:05:23.080 --> 01:05:28.440]  Okay, we need to go back in and reread.
[01:05:28.440 --> 01:05:33.720]  I'm thinking, I took the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act and turned it into a questionnaire,
[01:05:33.720 --> 01:05:42.080]  so I went through all of them, and it seems like there's something in there about the
[01:05:42.080 --> 01:05:53.680]  debt collector having to make an effort to collect before he can report you for non-payment.
[01:05:53.680 --> 01:05:58.720]  Do we have access to that questionnaire that you made?
[01:05:58.720 --> 01:06:01.680]  Yes, yes, go to aidox.com.
[01:06:01.680 --> 01:06:02.680]  A-I-D-O-C-S?
[01:06:02.680 --> 01:06:03.680]  Uh-huh.
[01:06:03.680 --> 01:06:04.680]  Okay.
[01:06:04.680 --> 01:06:19.080]  Then click, yeah, I think it may come up on the front page.
[01:06:19.080 --> 01:06:23.920]  Go there and see if it comes up as you control, you know, the open up one to make sure that
[01:06:23.920 --> 01:06:28.720]  I don't use that, so I forgot how I set it up.
[01:06:28.720 --> 01:06:36.800]  I'm old, I sleep, therefore I forget, yeah, just go to aidox.com and click on FDCPA.
[01:06:36.800 --> 01:06:43.040]  Okay, all right, now, I don't want to get you off topic here, but I've got questions
[01:06:43.040 --> 01:06:45.400]  if I don't get them out, I'll forget.
[01:06:45.400 --> 01:06:46.400]  Okay.
[01:06:46.400 --> 01:06:50.120]  I've got my head wrapped around that so far.
[01:06:50.120 --> 01:06:57.920]  I've been on a couple of boards, internet debt boards, and one of the, another question
[01:06:57.920 --> 01:07:05.960]  I have is, are there special rules for people in Texas concerning debt validation, information,
[01:07:05.960 --> 01:07:09.880]  and what they are required to send you?
[01:07:09.880 --> 01:07:15.480]  It seems like I've read that if you're in Texas or California, then they have to send
[01:07:15.480 --> 01:07:20.200]  you certain information, if you're not in one of the two states, and they're only required
[01:07:20.200 --> 01:07:24.680]  to send you the amount of the debt, the name of the creditor, you know, the things that
[01:07:24.680 --> 01:07:31.240]  are listed one through five here under section A of that validation of debts chapter.
[01:07:31.240 --> 01:07:35.000]  Is there any different for Texas?
[01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:37.560]  I don't know, Eddie, are you familiar with that?
[01:07:37.560 --> 01:07:43.360]  I primarily do federal, so I'm not familiar with that area of Texas law.
[01:07:43.360 --> 01:07:44.360]  Eddie, are you familiar with that?
[01:07:44.360 --> 01:07:46.880]  I'm not specifically familiar with it, no.
[01:07:46.880 --> 01:07:52.720]  I don't do a lot of the things through the Texas law because the federal is so much easier.
[01:07:52.720 --> 01:08:08.200]  Yeah, I did look at Texas law concerning, what was it, it was the fair, they have a,
[01:08:08.200 --> 01:08:15.920]  something similar to FDCPA, but when I looked at it, it was almost worthless, there's almost
[01:08:15.920 --> 01:08:21.640]  nothing there in Texas, there may be something specific to this, if there is, I'm not aware
[01:08:21.640 --> 01:08:22.640]  of what it is.
[01:08:22.640 --> 01:08:25.160]  All right, I'll have to do some more digging on that.
[01:08:25.160 --> 01:08:29.440]  The next question refers to statutes of limitation.
[01:08:29.440 --> 01:08:38.040]  Now when this alleged debt was defaulted on, I was in Arizona at the time.
[01:08:38.040 --> 01:08:45.800]  But now I live in Texas, do they apply the statute of limitations from Arizona when collecting
[01:08:45.800 --> 01:08:50.600]  this debt or the statute of limitations for Texas?
[01:08:50.600 --> 01:08:51.600]  Arizona.
[01:08:51.600 --> 01:08:55.280]  Because that's where it was incurred, it doesn't matter where you live, it was where the debt
[01:08:55.280 --> 01:08:56.280]  was.
[01:08:56.280 --> 01:08:57.280]  Right, right.
[01:08:57.280 --> 01:09:01.960]  You don't change venue because you moved, okay, then you will stay in Arizona.
[01:09:01.960 --> 01:09:02.960]  All right.
[01:09:02.960 --> 01:09:08.520]  So I think that answers the questions as far as that goes, and I had a real quick question
[01:09:08.520 --> 01:09:09.520]  for Eddie.
[01:09:09.520 --> 01:09:14.440]  First of all, Eddie, I want to tell you, man, I love hearing you on the radio, I heard you
[01:09:14.440 --> 01:09:20.920]  on Alex Jones a few weeks ago, we really need to get Randy back on Alex talking about these
[01:09:20.920 --> 01:09:23.680]  foreclosures and stuff.
[01:09:23.680 --> 01:09:30.680]  But my question was, I heard you mention one time that when they pull you over and they
[01:09:30.680 --> 01:09:37.680]  ask you for your insurance, there's other alternatives to that financial responsibility
[01:09:37.680 --> 01:09:40.400]  burden other than insurance.
[01:09:40.400 --> 01:09:43.960]  Can you tell us what those are, Eddie?
[01:09:43.960 --> 01:09:47.200]  Well there are actually seven or eight different things.
[01:09:47.200 --> 01:09:56.400]  They're all listed in the Texas Statutes in Chapter 601 of the Texas Transportation Code.
[01:09:56.400 --> 01:10:03.640]  When you go down through there and you look at it, I think it's 601.053, it's where it
[01:10:03.640 --> 01:10:09.200]  names the offense and it actually tells you right there that you are considered guilty
[01:10:09.200 --> 01:10:13.640]  until proven innocent of not having insurance.
[01:10:13.640 --> 01:10:19.400]  You literally must prove yourself innocent of the crime or the presumption is automatically
[01:10:19.400 --> 01:10:22.440]  set up in statute that you are guilty.
[01:10:22.440 --> 01:10:25.040]  That's a bill of attainder on its face.
[01:10:25.040 --> 01:10:29.240]  I thought this was the Texas we were living in, not Germany.
[01:10:29.240 --> 01:10:32.960]  No, it's all the Gestapo United States now.
[01:10:32.960 --> 01:10:34.960]  Didn't you know that?
[01:10:34.960 --> 01:10:40.120]  Well, yeah, I'm starting to sort of figure that out, but that's pretty bold to put that
[01:10:40.120 --> 01:10:42.160]  right in black and white.
[01:10:42.160 --> 01:10:43.880]  Yeah, it's there.
[01:10:43.880 --> 01:10:48.040]  It's there in several places actually under several different things.
[01:10:48.040 --> 01:10:50.040]  Okay, all right.
[01:10:50.040 --> 01:10:56.200]  But in any case, when you look there, you can be self-insured, you can have a bond insurance,
[01:10:56.200 --> 01:10:58.000]  you can have trust insurance.
[01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:04.280]  I mean, there's many different ways that you can cover the financial responsibility aspect
[01:11:04.280 --> 01:11:13.840]  other than insurance, yet if you get charged with anything saying no financial responsibility,
[01:11:13.840 --> 01:11:16.520]  you have to look at the charging instrument very carefully.
[01:11:16.520 --> 01:11:23.520]  A lot of times it will specifically charge you only with no insurance rather than simply
[01:11:23.520 --> 01:11:27.040]  no proof of financial responsibility.
[01:11:27.040 --> 01:11:32.800]  But again, why I'm considered innocent here, I don't have to prove anything.
[01:11:32.800 --> 01:11:34.640]  You have to prove I don't have it.
[01:11:34.640 --> 01:11:39.840]  The only way you can prove I don't have insurance or financial responsibility is to check with
[01:11:39.840 --> 01:11:43.880]  every insurance agent in every country of the world.
[01:11:43.880 --> 01:11:44.880]  Okay.
[01:11:44.880 --> 01:11:49.360]  So, you don't even have to, you don't even carry something on you that says that you
[01:11:49.360 --> 01:11:53.960]  are financially responsible through a bond or a trust or anything like that.
[01:11:53.960 --> 01:11:59.160]  You just tell them, hey, I'm innocent until you prove me guilty.
[01:11:59.160 --> 01:12:00.160]  Exactly.
[01:12:00.160 --> 01:12:01.160]  Okay, all right.
[01:12:01.160 --> 01:12:03.160]  But again, that's going to merits.
[01:12:03.160 --> 01:12:04.160]  Right.
[01:12:04.160 --> 01:12:09.280]  The merits argument doesn't have to be brought up mainly because of two things.
[01:12:09.280 --> 01:12:14.040]  First off, the argument here is not in transportation.
[01:12:14.040 --> 01:12:15.040]  It's not merits.
[01:12:15.040 --> 01:12:16.640]  It's not right to travel.
[01:12:16.640 --> 01:12:17.640]  It's none of that.
[01:12:17.640 --> 01:12:20.920]  The argument is not in transportation.
[01:12:20.920 --> 01:12:24.640]  The state's saying you're in transportation and have to obey these rules.
[01:12:24.640 --> 01:12:26.840]  We're saying we're not in transportation.
[01:12:26.840 --> 01:12:28.320]  These rules do not apply.
[01:12:28.320 --> 01:12:29.320]  Okay.
[01:12:29.320 --> 01:12:30.320]  I understand.
[01:12:30.320 --> 01:12:31.320]  All right.
[01:12:31.320 --> 01:12:33.560]  Listen, gentlemen, thank you for your time.
[01:12:33.560 --> 01:12:37.600]  You've been very helpful and I love the radio show and I'm going to be spreading this around
[01:12:37.600 --> 01:12:40.680]  to everybody that will listen to me for five minutes.
[01:12:40.680 --> 01:12:45.200]  And y'all have a great evening and thank you again.
[01:12:45.200 --> 01:12:50.320]  Well, we appreciate you calling in.
[01:12:50.320 --> 01:12:51.320]  All right.
[01:12:51.320 --> 01:12:54.000]  Who's our next caller up here?
[01:12:54.000 --> 01:12:55.000]  Let's see.
[01:12:55.000 --> 01:12:57.760]  That would be Grant in Texas is our next caller.
[01:12:57.760 --> 01:12:59.760]  Grant, what can we do for you?
[01:12:59.760 --> 01:13:00.760]  Hi, Eddie.
[01:13:00.760 --> 01:13:02.680]  How are y'all doing this evening?
[01:13:02.680 --> 01:13:04.680]  So far so grand.
[01:13:04.680 --> 01:13:05.680]  Excellent.
[01:13:05.680 --> 01:13:11.320]  So I just wanted to let Randy know that after approximately fighting 18 months through border
[01:13:11.320 --> 01:13:17.920]  for division trials, I pretty much exhausted all of my remedy and it looks like I don't
[01:13:17.920 --> 01:13:23.040]  have anything else to be able to stay the execution of the judgment for the writ of
[01:13:23.040 --> 01:13:24.040]  possession.
[01:13:24.040 --> 01:13:27.400]  Have you sued in the federal court?
[01:13:27.400 --> 01:13:29.840]  Well, I have two suites.
[01:13:29.840 --> 01:13:31.840]  I have a suit in the federal court.
[01:13:31.840 --> 01:13:39.120]  I got dismissed and that's on appeal and then I have a district court case that I filed
[01:13:39.120 --> 01:13:45.360]  and I actually filed that the morning of trying to get the supercedius bond.
[01:13:45.360 --> 01:13:46.360]  Okay.
[01:13:46.360 --> 01:13:47.360]  Yes.
[01:13:47.360 --> 01:13:51.280]  All is not lost.
[01:13:51.280 --> 01:13:58.840]  They will most likely, so long as a suit is in place, not move to force you out.
[01:13:58.840 --> 01:14:05.920]  They'll put all their paperwork in place so that they can, but so long as your property
[01:14:05.920 --> 01:14:11.120]  is tied up in a lawsuit, they're not going to want it to be empty.
[01:14:11.120 --> 01:14:20.600]  Well, they've actually already gotten a constable out to post a notice to vacate and the only
[01:14:20.600 --> 01:14:26.240]  reason I got that stopped is because I got a TRO and then I got a temporary injunction
[01:14:26.240 --> 01:14:32.440]  hearing, which I lost, so they've actually gotten a constable to post a notice to vacate.
[01:14:32.440 --> 01:14:33.440]  Okay.
[01:14:33.440 --> 01:14:41.040]  Have you looked at their documentation to see how correct it is?
[01:14:41.040 --> 01:14:42.040]  Which documentation?
[01:14:42.040 --> 01:14:43.040]  Do you mean it?
[01:14:43.040 --> 01:14:49.360]  They're affidavit to show authority to foreclose, looking for RoboSigners.
[01:14:49.360 --> 01:14:50.360]  Oh, yeah.
[01:14:50.360 --> 01:14:51.360]  Yeah.
[01:14:51.360 --> 01:14:57.880]  The trustee deed has problems, the affidavit in support of the deed has problems, I argue
[01:14:57.880 --> 01:14:58.880]  on that.
[01:14:58.880 --> 01:14:59.880]  Of course.
[01:14:59.880 --> 01:15:03.000]  You might want to look at the criminal side.
[01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:04.000]  Okay.
[01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:10.720]  You start going after these guys criminally and they're likely to say, whoa, that's a
[01:15:10.720 --> 01:15:12.560]  whole different ball game.
[01:15:12.560 --> 01:15:16.960]  Now, what statute specifically would that entail?
[01:15:16.960 --> 01:15:26.960]  Well, if someone has signed one of these documents, say someone signs it as the vice president
[01:15:26.960 --> 01:15:36.000]  of a bank and you call that bank and ask for personnel and tell them that you want to talk
[01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:42.720]  to this person's secretary and the people in personnel don't know about the RoboSigners.
[01:15:42.720 --> 01:15:47.520]  They don't know, they don't have a clue about all of that stuff going on and they check
[01:15:47.520 --> 01:15:52.920]  their roster and they say, well, we don't have a vice president by that name.
[01:15:52.920 --> 01:15:56.080]  Well, when did he work for you?
[01:15:56.080 --> 01:16:00.760]  Well, we never had one, gotcha guys.
[01:16:00.760 --> 01:16:09.240]  Now you go back and whoever signed that, they get tampering with the government document
[01:16:09.240 --> 01:16:15.880]  and whoever they signed it for, the bank, they get tampering with the government document
[01:16:15.880 --> 01:16:19.440]  and respond to yet superior.
[01:16:19.440 --> 01:16:26.360]  You take that to a grand jury and ask a grand jury what they think about this nonsense.
[01:16:26.360 --> 01:16:30.200]  And once you start running the routine on the prosecutor, these guys are looking to go
[01:16:30.200 --> 01:16:35.280]  into prison and we had the attorney general in Arizona just get some indictments on this
[01:16:35.280 --> 01:16:39.400]  very issue and this may give them reason to back up.
[01:16:39.400 --> 01:16:44.080]  This is Randy Kelsen, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig, you have no radio.
[01:16:44.080 --> 01:16:53.320]  Let's see, it's the quarter after, we've got three more segments, give us a call, 512-646-1984.
[01:16:53.320 --> 01:16:59.320]  We'll be right back with Grant on the other side, me and John, I see you down there, we'll get to you.
[01:16:59.320 --> 01:17:05.040]  Capital Corn and Bullion is a family owned and operated business that has helped many
[01:17:05.040 --> 01:17:09.960]  families and friends in protecting their assets and we would like to do the same for you.
[01:17:09.960 --> 01:17:16.360]  In addition to Coins and Bullion, we now offer Patriot Saves, Ammunition, Berkey Water Products,
[01:17:16.360 --> 01:17:21.640]  Gift Certificates, Risk Bands and our new Silver Pool, a new way to guarantee silver
[01:17:21.640 --> 01:17:24.280]  by prepaying at a locked price.
[01:17:24.280 --> 01:17:32.880]  We can even help you set up a metals IRA account, call us at 512-646-640 for more details.
[01:17:32.880 --> 01:17:38.400]  As always, we buy, sell and trade precious metals and cater to those with all sizes of
[01:17:38.400 --> 01:17:39.400]  coin collections.
[01:17:39.400 --> 01:17:46.520]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half a mile north of Canaan, next
[01:17:46.520 --> 01:17:49.080]  to the Ikebansushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[01:17:49.080 --> 01:17:56.160]  We're open Monday through Friday 10-6, Saturdays 10-5, visit us at CapitalCornandBullion.com
[01:17:56.160 --> 01:18:00.680]  or call 512-646-640.
[01:18:00.680 --> 01:18:05.080]  What's been the problem with phone companies, high prices and contracts that lock you in
[01:18:05.080 --> 01:18:09.000]  for two years minimum, not FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:13.520]  Freedom Telephones are designed around the concept and reality of patriotism, loyalty
[01:18:13.520 --> 01:18:14.520]  and privacy.
[01:18:14.520 --> 01:18:20.360]  With FreedomTelephones.com, there are no contracts, no credit checks and no social security numbers
[01:18:20.360 --> 01:18:21.360]  required.
[01:18:21.360 --> 01:18:23.840]  That's why our name is FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:23.840 --> 01:18:28.680]  Finally, residential, mobile and business telephones and plans that are private and
[01:18:28.680 --> 01:18:30.760]  never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:30.760 --> 01:18:36.640]  When a low price, residential and business plans started only $14.99 and mobile plans
[01:18:36.640 --> 01:18:38.120]  started just $39.99.
[01:18:38.120 --> 01:18:43.560]  Plus, every month you pay your bill, FreedomTelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs.
[01:18:43.560 --> 01:18:48.880]  Don't wait, support the cause and get the highest quality and the lowest prices by calling
[01:18:48.880 --> 01:19:14.200]  1-800-600-5553, that's 800-600-5553, FreedomTelephones.com, portable, private, perfect.
[01:19:18.880 --> 01:19:44.160]  FreedomTelephones are designed around the concept and reality of patriotism, loyalty and privacy.
[01:19:44.160 --> 01:20:10.560]  FreedomTelephones are designed around the concept and reality of patriotism, loyalty and privacy.
[01:20:10.560 --> 01:20:18.880]  It's unusual for the lender to go ahead and try to force you out of the property while
[01:20:18.880 --> 01:20:20.880]  you're in litigation.
[01:20:20.880 --> 01:20:26.320]  So, up in the stakes for a night to get their attention.
[01:20:26.320 --> 01:20:27.320]  Right.
[01:20:27.320 --> 01:20:35.440]  Well, one thing I discovered is that the attorney that was operating under a PC, a private corporation,
[01:20:35.440 --> 01:20:42.440]  I checked with the Secretary of State and their charter has been forfeited for the past
[01:20:42.440 --> 01:20:46.440]  13 years.
[01:20:46.440 --> 01:20:51.680]  And so, I brought a temporary injunction proof of that, but apparently it had no bearing
[01:20:51.680 --> 01:20:53.680]  on the judge's decision.
[01:20:53.680 --> 01:20:58.080]  What is the remedy for that?
[01:20:58.080 --> 01:21:03.200]  One remedy I'm pursuing in my district case is Chapter 12 of the Civil Privacy Remedies
[01:21:03.200 --> 01:21:14.120]  Code, which indicates the fraudulent use or filing of a court record or public record.
[01:21:14.120 --> 01:21:21.680]  And so, there it allows either, I think, a $20,000 damage or more, depending on, you
[01:21:21.680 --> 01:21:23.680]  know, what the actual damage is for.
[01:21:23.680 --> 01:21:29.440]  Rosie, you might be able to go after that through a queer term action.
[01:21:29.440 --> 01:21:33.200]  Well, I think I discussed that with you one time.
[01:21:33.200 --> 01:21:34.680]  I think this is a private remedy.
[01:21:34.680 --> 01:21:36.920]  I don't know if it's a public remedy.
[01:21:36.920 --> 01:21:37.920]  Okay.
[01:21:37.920 --> 01:21:38.920]  So, is it a penalty?
[01:21:38.920 --> 01:21:44.720]  I mean, is it something that would go to you or is this a fee or a fine that had to
[01:21:44.720 --> 01:21:45.720]  pay to the government?
[01:21:45.720 --> 01:21:46.720]  No.
[01:21:46.720 --> 01:21:48.920]  It's a private remedy that would go to me.
[01:21:48.920 --> 01:21:49.920]  Oh, okay.
[01:21:49.920 --> 01:21:56.640]  I don't think it was a government, but, I mean, it's pretty obvious, I mean, in my
[01:21:56.640 --> 01:22:02.880]  case, a forceful detainer, he fouled via spill bond two days late, so the county court didn't
[01:22:02.880 --> 01:22:03.880]  even have jurisdiction.
[01:22:03.880 --> 01:22:12.040]  And, I mean, and this is enforcing a foreclosure where the day that was cobalt signed.
[01:22:12.040 --> 01:22:16.000]  It had the information and belief in it, which, you know, makes the affidavit invalid.
[01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:23.320]  It was operating under corporations and forfeited by the Secretary of State for 13 years.
[01:22:23.320 --> 01:22:26.880]  I even had a certified document with the Secretary.
[01:22:26.880 --> 01:22:31.400]  I mean, I have a pretty much slammed up case problem I'm having right now.
[01:22:31.400 --> 01:22:37.120]  There's, you know, at any point can toss all my stuff out of the house, so I'm trying
[01:22:37.120 --> 01:22:41.080]  to decide, you know, I'm not going to, I'm not going to re-increase possession and give
[01:22:41.080 --> 01:22:46.680]  up the key, but I have to kind of be prepared where they can't just come in, you know, throw
[01:22:46.680 --> 01:22:47.680]  thousands of pictures.
[01:22:47.680 --> 01:22:48.680]  Yeah.
[01:22:48.680 --> 01:22:49.680]  Yeah, I understand.
[01:22:49.680 --> 01:22:56.200]  So you've been, you know, actually, you know, more about this than I do, but I have, at
[01:22:56.200 --> 01:23:01.400]  this point, I have no idea how to advise you, and a lot of us don't know what all is going
[01:23:01.400 --> 01:23:02.400]  on.
[01:23:02.400 --> 01:23:08.120]  But if they're moving ahead with trying to force you out, you might want to give them,
[01:23:08.120 --> 01:23:14.720]  you know, make it hot for them, and criminal side, you've got the evidence that it's always
[01:23:14.720 --> 01:23:15.720]  an option.
[01:23:15.720 --> 01:23:21.160]  If they look at the potential of criminal prosecution, that will make a civil action
[01:23:21.160 --> 01:23:23.160]  against them a slam dunk.
[01:23:23.160 --> 01:23:27.600]  Now, who would you go after criminally, though, because, I mean, here we're talking about
[01:23:27.600 --> 01:23:35.440]  the bank or the lender, but, or, or whatever, whoever is depending on the forged documents.
[01:23:35.440 --> 01:23:36.440]  Okay.
[01:23:36.440 --> 01:23:45.560]  They come to the court with unclean hands, and they're profiting from the fraud, so
[01:23:45.560 --> 01:23:47.160]  they are equally culpable.
[01:23:47.160 --> 01:23:50.080]  The problem is, I don't have a name.
[01:23:50.080 --> 01:23:51.080]  I don't even know.
[01:23:51.080 --> 01:23:55.200]  I mean, all I have is the attorney, the alleged attorney.
[01:23:55.200 --> 01:23:56.840]  That's who you go after.
[01:23:56.840 --> 01:23:57.840]  Okay.
[01:23:57.840 --> 01:23:58.840]  The agent.
[01:23:58.840 --> 01:24:03.720]  I'm about to do a rule 12 motion for the attorney to show authority.
[01:24:03.720 --> 01:24:09.040]  I'm going to do that both in my district case and in the county case.
[01:24:09.040 --> 01:24:10.040]  Okay.
[01:24:10.040 --> 01:24:11.040]  Good.
[01:24:11.040 --> 01:24:12.040]  Good.
[01:24:12.040 --> 01:24:20.560]  And, but even if he does, if this is based on fraud, the attorney is still liable.
[01:24:20.560 --> 01:24:21.560]  Okay.
[01:24:21.560 --> 01:24:26.480]  He had a duty to know that he's perpetrating a fraud.
[01:24:26.480 --> 01:24:29.400]  He can't claim that he has clean hands.
[01:24:29.400 --> 01:24:30.400]  Okay.
[01:24:30.400 --> 01:24:36.800]  So he's always the one you want to go after you want him answering your pleadings.
[01:24:36.800 --> 01:24:42.640]  That's not unbuildable time for him and has the potential of affecting him directly.
[01:24:42.640 --> 01:24:44.920]  This makes him really, really unhappy.
[01:24:44.920 --> 01:24:51.520]  Well, they weren't, he wasn't very happy when I got a TRO extension in my case, and
[01:24:51.520 --> 01:24:56.480]  the judge had denied the temporary injunction, which I got it before I knew that the order
[01:24:56.480 --> 01:24:57.480]  was submitted.
[01:24:57.480 --> 01:25:02.640]  They tried to do a motion for sanctioned against me and implied that I lied, so I actually
[01:25:02.640 --> 01:25:08.640]  personally called the attorney yesterday, and I told him how dare he challenge whether
[01:25:08.640 --> 01:25:11.240]  I'm lying and challenge my integrity.
[01:25:11.240 --> 01:25:15.520]  And I told him I was calling him personally to deliver that message, but he didn't take
[01:25:15.520 --> 01:25:16.520]  that too nicely.
[01:25:16.520 --> 01:25:18.520]  He didn't like it very much.
[01:25:18.520 --> 01:25:19.520]  Good.
[01:25:19.520 --> 01:25:20.520]  Good.
[01:25:20.520 --> 01:25:21.520]  Good.
[01:25:21.520 --> 01:25:22.520]  Okay.
[01:25:22.520 --> 01:25:23.520]  Do you have anything else for us?
[01:25:23.520 --> 01:25:24.520]  No.
[01:25:24.520 --> 01:25:25.520]  That's it, Randy.
[01:25:25.520 --> 01:25:26.520]  Thanks for all your...
[01:25:26.520 --> 01:25:27.520]  I'm going to do that challenge to the authority.
[01:25:27.520 --> 01:25:28.520]  I like that.
[01:25:28.520 --> 01:25:29.520]  Okay.
[01:25:29.520 --> 01:25:30.520]  Thanks for calling in, Grant.
[01:25:30.520 --> 01:25:31.520]  Okay.
[01:25:31.520 --> 01:25:34.520]  Let's move on to Lynn in Texas.
[01:25:34.520 --> 01:25:35.520]  Hello.
[01:25:35.520 --> 01:25:36.520]  There we go.
[01:25:36.520 --> 01:25:37.520]  Okay.
[01:25:37.520 --> 01:25:40.520]  Lynn, what do you have for us?
[01:25:40.520 --> 01:25:41.520]  Hi.
[01:25:41.520 --> 01:25:42.520]  Good evening.
[01:25:42.520 --> 01:25:46.520]  Before I get into the question, I would like to take the traffic seminar on a Sunday.
[01:25:46.520 --> 01:25:49.520]  I'm just about to know the location of that seminar.
[01:25:49.520 --> 01:25:51.520]  I've got the course.
[01:25:51.520 --> 01:25:58.520]  He's down at Brave New Books at the corner of Guadalupe and Martin Luther King.
[01:25:58.520 --> 01:26:00.520]  Brave New Books at what time?
[01:26:00.520 --> 01:26:06.520]  From 2 to 5 and then from 5 to 6 we talk about individual issues and cases.
[01:26:06.520 --> 01:26:07.520]  Okay.
[01:26:07.520 --> 01:26:08.520]  2 to 6.
[01:26:08.520 --> 01:26:09.520]  Brave New Books.
[01:26:09.520 --> 01:26:10.520]  Okay.
[01:26:10.520 --> 01:26:11.520]  Guadalupe and...
[01:26:11.520 --> 01:26:12.520]  What was that?
[01:26:12.520 --> 01:26:13.520]  Martin Luther King.
[01:26:13.520 --> 01:26:14.520]  Martin Luther King.
[01:26:14.520 --> 01:26:15.520]  Thank you.
[01:26:15.520 --> 01:26:16.520]  Yeah.
[01:26:16.520 --> 01:26:26.520]  And come down there and bring lots of money to donate to Andy's beer fund.
[01:26:26.520 --> 01:26:30.520]  I've been pushing that beer fund here lately.
[01:26:30.520 --> 01:26:35.520]  I'd like for my niece to talk to him about nutrition and staying.
[01:26:35.520 --> 01:26:40.520]  I only drink nutritious beer.
[01:26:40.520 --> 01:26:41.520]  Okay.
[01:26:41.520 --> 01:26:47.520]  I'm very interested in the Runaway Grand Jury.
[01:26:47.520 --> 01:26:51.520]  How do you assemble a Runaway Grand Jury?
[01:26:51.520 --> 01:26:52.520]  You don't.
[01:26:52.520 --> 01:26:53.520]  You don't.
[01:26:53.520 --> 01:26:54.520]  You don't.
[01:26:54.520 --> 01:26:56.520]  You don't.
[01:26:56.520 --> 01:27:02.520]  This nonsense of these people assembling their own private grand juries that have no forcing
[01:27:02.520 --> 01:27:03.520]  effect.
[01:27:03.520 --> 01:27:08.520]  Well, don't grand juries aren't they able to investigate?
[01:27:08.520 --> 01:27:10.520]  Yeah, they are.
[01:27:10.520 --> 01:27:14.520]  You don't assemble a Runaway Grand Jury.
[01:27:14.520 --> 01:27:19.520]  The court assembles a grand jury.
[01:27:19.520 --> 01:27:27.520]  You hope that the grand jury becomes a Runaway Grand Jury, but that's up to the grand jury.
[01:27:27.520 --> 01:27:33.520]  And what they call a Runaway Grand Jury is a grand jury who doesn't do everything the
[01:27:33.520 --> 01:27:35.520]  prosecutor wants him to.
[01:27:35.520 --> 01:27:44.520]  We had one in Houston recently that was investigating into police improprieties, and the prosecutor
[01:27:44.520 --> 01:27:51.520]  tried to interfere, and the grand jury threw him out, told the plaintiff, if the prosecutor
[01:27:51.520 --> 01:27:54.520]  doesn't leave, you're to arrest him.
[01:27:54.520 --> 01:28:01.520]  That was considered a Runaway Grand Jury because they actually had the audacity to do their
[01:28:01.520 --> 01:28:02.520]  jobs.
[01:28:02.520 --> 01:28:10.520]  The way we will get Runaway Grand Juries is through educating people.
[01:28:10.520 --> 01:28:19.520]  And one of the things I'm looking at doing is I'm putting up on Jerusalem Prudence website.
[01:28:19.520 --> 01:28:23.520]  I've got all the complaints against Cherokee County.
[01:28:23.520 --> 01:28:30.520]  I'm going to try to get other people to look at those complaints and file them, pull them
[01:28:30.520 --> 01:28:33.520]  down, print them out.
[01:28:33.520 --> 01:28:44.520]  And the thing about filing a criminal complaint is if you have reason to believe and do believe
[01:28:44.520 --> 01:28:48.520]  that a crime has been committed to you, not only have the right to file a criminal complaint,
[01:28:48.520 --> 01:28:50.520]  you have a duty.
[01:28:50.520 --> 01:28:52.520]  You don't have to have personal knowledge.
[01:28:52.520 --> 01:28:57.520]  You don't have to have proof, just reason to believe and do believe.
[01:28:57.520 --> 01:29:05.520]  So I would like to get a whole site put up where people can post, where they have been
[01:29:05.520 --> 01:29:13.520]  horribly mistreated, and we get people to start sending complaints to grand juries.
[01:29:13.520 --> 01:29:16.520]  One complaint won't move the grand jury.
[01:29:16.520 --> 01:29:25.520]  But if we get 10 or 20 down there, the grand jury is going to say, whoa, hold on here.
[01:29:25.520 --> 01:29:27.520]  We start that.
[01:29:27.520 --> 01:29:33.520]  That's why I'm pushing for this legislation so we can go down and present to them directly.
[01:29:33.520 --> 01:29:41.520]  But primarily, just have to start using those grand juries, sending them complaints, trying
[01:29:41.520 --> 01:29:46.520]  to do our best to talk to them and get the complaints in front of them.
[01:29:46.520 --> 01:29:49.520]  This is rank, health, and devastating.
[01:29:49.520 --> 01:29:51.520]  Hang on in.
[01:29:51.520 --> 01:29:53.520]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[01:29:53.520 --> 01:29:59.520]  I'm going to see if we can come back.
[01:29:59.520 --> 01:30:03.520]  Top 10 reasons to question the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing.
[01:30:03.520 --> 01:30:04.520]  Reason number 10.
[01:30:04.520 --> 01:30:06.520]  What is on the surveillance tapes?
[01:30:06.520 --> 01:30:09.520]  There were many video surveillance cameras that recorded the morning of the bombing.
[01:30:09.520 --> 01:30:13.520]  Yet the few of these that have been released do not show what transpired with the rider truck at the Murrow Building.
[01:30:13.520 --> 01:30:17.520]  Most recently, the government has claimed that all of the cameras that were in different buildings
[01:30:17.520 --> 01:30:21.520]  and maintained by different businesses were all having their tapes changed at the exact same time.
[01:30:21.520 --> 01:30:24.520]  This is insulting to the memory of those who perished in the bombing.
[01:30:24.520 --> 01:30:26.520]  What is being hidden from us?
[01:30:26.520 --> 01:30:32.520]  For more information, please go to okcbombingtruth.com.
[01:30:32.520 --> 01:30:39.520]  Michigan may soon require kids' body fat ratings to be sent to a state registry instead of to their parents.
[01:30:39.520 --> 01:30:44.520]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, and if this seems wrong to you, then you won't want to miss my next segment.
[01:30:44.520 --> 01:30:46.520]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:46.520 --> 01:30:50.520]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:50.520 --> 01:30:55.520]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:55.520 --> 01:30:56.520]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:56.520 --> 01:31:00.520]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:31:00.520 --> 01:31:01.520]  Privacy.
[01:31:01.520 --> 01:31:03.520]  It's worth hanging on to.
[01:31:03.520 --> 01:31:06.520]  This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com,
[01:31:06.520 --> 01:31:10.520]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:31:10.520 --> 01:31:13.520]  Start over with Start Page.
[01:31:13.520 --> 01:31:21.520]  Like much of the country, Michigan has an obesity problem. 65% of adults and 12% of kids are considered overweight.
[01:31:21.520 --> 01:31:25.520]  But now Governor Rick Snyder plans to require children to get weight screenings
[01:31:25.520 --> 01:31:30.520]  and have their body fat ratings sent to a state registry rather than to their own parents.
[01:31:30.520 --> 01:31:33.520]  That's right, if a kid's weight passes a certain threshold,
[01:31:33.520 --> 01:31:38.520]  children and their parents will get called in by a doctor to discuss the weight problem.
[01:31:38.520 --> 01:31:43.520]  Meanwhile, the child's medical profile will be closely monitored by big government, big brother.
[01:31:43.520 --> 01:31:46.520]  Nobody is encouraging obesity here, but what's next?
[01:31:46.520 --> 01:31:49.520]  Taking kids away from their parents if they don't lose the weight?
[01:31:49.520 --> 01:32:09.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32:19.520 --> 01:32:29.520]  Here it is, we're back.
[01:32:29.520 --> 01:32:31.520]  Linda Keltz with the Sea of the Dead and Freak.
[01:32:31.520 --> 01:32:37.520]  We're here on radio talking to Linda in a lecture about runaway grand juries.
[01:32:37.520 --> 01:32:45.520]  Linda, do you have an issue that you're looking to present to her grand jury?
[01:32:45.520 --> 01:32:53.520]  Well, I was, I was, been listening to the show for the last week and one would be these community courts.
[01:32:53.520 --> 01:33:01.520]  Ah, yes. That would be an interesting issue to take to a grand jury.
[01:33:01.520 --> 01:33:08.520]  Because they certainly appear to be in violation of law and therefore criminal.
[01:33:08.520 --> 01:33:23.520]  Taxes grand jurors aren't as powerful or they don't have as much jurisdiction as grand juries in some other states, specifically California.
[01:33:23.520 --> 01:33:32.520]  In that in California, grand jurors can are similar to the federal grand jurors who can investigate into anything.
[01:33:32.520 --> 01:33:39.520]  Into criminal wrongdoing or wrongdoing by public officials.
[01:33:39.520 --> 01:33:44.520]  They can look into contracts to see if the contracts are questionable.
[01:33:44.520 --> 01:33:46.520]  They can look into anything you want to.
[01:33:46.520 --> 01:33:59.520]  In Texas, the grand jurors, under 20.09, the grand jury shall investigate into all criminal accusations that come to their knowledge.
[01:33:59.520 --> 01:34:05.520]  And that's the limit of the authority of grand jurors in Texas.
[01:34:05.520 --> 01:34:12.520]  So anything that's presented to them must be presented in terms of a violation of a criminal statute.
[01:34:12.520 --> 01:34:16.520]  So that is somewhat of a limitation.
[01:34:16.520 --> 01:34:24.520]  But these courts that they're attempting to use in Austin.
[01:34:24.520 --> 01:34:31.520]  Convened in violating to clear violation of law that gets pretty serious and criminal.
[01:34:31.520 --> 01:34:38.520]  We have a judge purporting to sit in the case he's impersonating a judicial officer.
[01:34:38.520 --> 01:34:49.520]  Every official who's purporting to act in one of these courts is impersonating a judicial officer.
[01:34:49.520 --> 01:34:53.520]  They may actually be a judicial officer.
[01:34:53.520 --> 01:35:01.520]  But when they're acting in this particular court, they're not because the court is not the proper court.
[01:35:01.520 --> 01:35:03.520]  So they're impersonating.
[01:35:03.520 --> 01:35:08.520]  They're denying citizens and rights is all kind of stuff.
[01:35:08.520 --> 01:35:13.520]  And you can construe conspiracy.
[01:35:13.520 --> 01:35:25.520]  I think that's 1502 because they're acting in concert inclusion. Conspiracy is one of those things you don't have to prove that you can imply.
[01:35:25.520 --> 01:35:30.520]  And that's because it is the nature of conspiracy to be hidden.
[01:35:30.520 --> 01:35:41.520]  So you can imply by their behavior conspiracy that in here this is the perfect charge because they'd all have to be acting concert inclusion one or the other in order to perpetrate this.
[01:35:41.520 --> 01:35:45.520]  So I would very much like to see you file that.
[01:35:45.520 --> 01:35:49.520]  That would be a lot of fun to run through the system.
[01:35:49.520 --> 01:35:52.520]  And it's a nice, clean complaint.
[01:35:52.520 --> 01:35:57.520]  It's not like you're going in there with an axe to grind.
[01:35:57.520 --> 01:36:01.520]  There's nobody to beat you up or stolen from you.
[01:36:01.520 --> 01:36:04.520]  You just operate in these courts and improper.
[01:36:04.520 --> 01:36:06.520]  So it's nice and technical.
[01:36:06.520 --> 01:36:15.520]  And it's forgotten the rule of law, I think, and they've been lazy on their steps that they should have taken.
[01:36:15.520 --> 01:36:16.520]  Exactly.
[01:36:16.520 --> 01:36:20.520]  And this is absolutely the best way to go after them.
[01:36:20.520 --> 01:36:23.520]  Guys, it's not personal.
[01:36:23.520 --> 01:36:31.520]  Yeah, sure, I'm trying to get you arrested, but nothing personal.
[01:36:31.520 --> 01:36:37.520]  It makes it makes it much harder for them to villainize you.
[01:36:37.520 --> 01:36:47.520]  And they'll definitely try to do that in order to demonstrate that you're not a credible witness in this regard.
[01:36:47.520 --> 01:36:52.520]  Something like this where there's you're not here to say you've been harmed.
[01:36:52.520 --> 01:36:54.520]  You're not a victim.
[01:36:54.520 --> 01:36:56.520]  You just want them to follow law.
[01:36:56.520 --> 01:37:00.520]  I mean, who can argue with that?
[01:37:00.520 --> 01:37:03.520]  Okay, Linda, do you have anything else for us?
[01:37:03.520 --> 01:37:06.520]  We've got two more colleagues in a second and a half left.
[01:37:06.520 --> 01:37:07.520]  Thank you very much.
[01:37:07.520 --> 01:37:09.520]  I look forward to Sunday.
[01:37:09.520 --> 01:37:11.520]  Okay, thank you.
[01:37:11.520 --> 01:37:15.520]  Now we're going to go to John in California.
[01:37:15.520 --> 01:37:17.520]  Thank you very much, John.
[01:37:17.520 --> 01:37:28.520]  Before I ask the questions, I wanted to let you know that I found you by just kind of looking through YouTube's personal legal information on some of my problems.
[01:37:28.520 --> 01:37:30.520]  I was extremely impressed.
[01:37:30.520 --> 01:37:34.520]  I was kind of giving up on a lot of things and how I was going to fight all this stuff.
[01:37:34.520 --> 01:37:43.520]  And you gave me an awful lot of hope and insight about some of the things you were doing that the average person really can get in there and do this.
[01:37:43.520 --> 01:37:51.520]  The biggest problem I have is because I have so many issues, it's really where to start and what to attack and how to go about it.
[01:37:51.520 --> 01:37:53.520]  I'm just too new at it yet.
[01:37:53.520 --> 01:37:55.520]  You need to talk to Eddie here.
[01:37:55.520 --> 01:38:09.520]  The way Eddie came to us is that he was calling me and asking questions because he was trying to take on these tax folks and they were ignoring law and he was looking for remedy.
[01:38:09.520 --> 01:38:16.520]  And he called him to find out how to file criminal charges and we talked about that.
[01:38:16.520 --> 01:38:21.520]  About the third time Eddie called in, I told everybody we need to get this guy on the air.
[01:38:21.520 --> 01:38:26.520]  But he took our advice and he filed criminal charges.
[01:38:26.520 --> 01:38:28.520]  How many did you file Eddie?
[01:38:28.520 --> 01:38:30.520]  481.
[01:38:30.520 --> 01:38:33.520]  Is that for you?
[01:38:33.520 --> 01:38:38.520]  So, and this is common.
[01:38:38.520 --> 01:38:49.520]  When you shift that gear and step out of the victim mode and into the mode of the sovereign
[01:38:49.520 --> 01:38:59.520]  and start looking at what they've done and what criminal statutes are implicated, you will have a problem with too many complaints.
[01:38:59.520 --> 01:39:02.520]  Well, I've got enough without that yet.
[01:39:02.520 --> 01:39:05.520]  Yes, so, and that's always the case.
[01:39:05.520 --> 01:39:13.520]  So, you know, what I tend to do is look for, you want to come up with a story.
[01:39:13.520 --> 01:39:16.520]  Everything needs to revolve around a good story.
[01:39:16.520 --> 01:39:24.520]  If you look on jurisimprudence.com, I've got a writ of habeas corpus on there.
[01:39:24.520 --> 01:39:30.520]  And that writ of habeas corpus walks through due process from front to back.
[01:39:30.520 --> 01:39:35.520]  And I make a lot of criminal accusations in there.
[01:39:35.520 --> 01:39:47.520]  There are a lot more accusations I could have made, but they wouldn't necessarily lead toward the outcome.
[01:39:47.520 --> 01:39:56.520]  I was trying to bring the person reading it to or it wouldn't lead toward the final conclusion.
[01:39:56.520 --> 01:40:06.520]  I picked those complaints to charge them with that tended to point at the improprieties that I was talking about.
[01:40:06.520 --> 01:40:20.520]  I'm claiming that these guys over a period of time develop these practices and procedures ostensibly to streamline the prosecutorial process.
[01:40:20.520 --> 01:40:34.520]  Not out of vindictiveness or bad spirit, but by doing this, they created this situation where they put every person accused of crime
[01:40:34.520 --> 01:40:38.520]  in a position to where he had little or no option but to take a deal.
[01:40:38.520 --> 01:40:46.520]  So everything that I accused him of, I chose it so it pointed toward those conclusions.
[01:40:46.520 --> 01:40:53.520]  That's your most difficult part, but it's also the most fun because it's creative.
[01:40:53.520 --> 01:41:00.520]  You get to find the ones that, well, I see they did this and because they did this, they did this and they did this.
[01:41:00.520 --> 01:41:05.520]  Now, I accuse him of doing it for a certain reason.
[01:41:05.520 --> 01:41:14.520]  And I pretty well know for the most part that in their minds they weren't doing it for the reasons I attribute to it.
[01:41:14.520 --> 01:41:22.520]  But it sounds good and then perception is everything.
[01:41:22.520 --> 01:41:28.520]  Well, I understand writing a story. I'm in the financial business and I have to justify certain my actions a lot of times.
[01:41:28.520 --> 01:41:36.520]  And if you don't justify them in the storyline that you want to present, somebody else is going to pick it up and justify the storyline you may not like.
[01:41:36.520 --> 01:41:38.520]  You're exactly right.
[01:41:38.520 --> 01:41:46.520]  And all the time you want to think, what is my reader going to think?
[01:41:46.520 --> 01:41:51.520]  What question will I create in the mind of my reader?
[01:41:51.520 --> 01:41:56.520]  Well, my wife always had an aptitude for law and I always had an aptitude for medicine.
[01:41:56.520 --> 01:42:01.520]  She now can't do that anymore and I'm having to jump into that mold and it's a different way of thinking.
[01:42:01.520 --> 01:42:04.520]  But essentially what she told me was two things.
[01:42:04.520 --> 01:42:08.520]  One is to remain dignified about what was done.
[01:42:08.520 --> 01:42:16.520]  And the other thing is always right with the view that the person who's going to decide the situation is reading what you wrote.
[01:42:16.520 --> 01:42:20.520]  So you've got to present your argument.
[01:42:20.520 --> 01:42:26.520]  Yeah, and everything is about how you move the mind of your reader.
[01:42:26.520 --> 01:42:28.520]  Right. That's exactly what she was saying.
[01:42:28.520 --> 01:42:34.520]  Not how you will respond to it, but how's my reader going to respond to it?
[01:42:34.520 --> 01:42:38.520]  What question will I create in my reader's mind?
[01:42:38.520 --> 01:42:47.520]  I need to know what that question is before I create it and give them the answer just before I create the question.
[01:42:47.520 --> 01:42:52.520]  And that will create in the mind of your reader the experience of rapport.
[01:42:52.520 --> 01:42:54.520]  Well, that's interesting.
[01:42:54.520 --> 01:43:02.520]  This guy knew what I was thinking. He knew what I was about to ask and he answered it before I did it.
[01:43:02.520 --> 01:43:04.520]  And that will give you a rapport.
[01:43:04.520 --> 01:43:10.520]  Sometimes I will deliberately create a question, but then immediately answer it.
[01:43:10.520 --> 01:43:14.520]  If you don't, then you lose the reader.
[01:43:14.520 --> 01:43:24.520]  Yeah, that's what I have mostly done is asked the question to get a specific response. I never thought about presenting an answer before I asked the question.
[01:43:24.520 --> 01:43:33.520]  Well, if you think about where your reader's at, you know, if you ever talk to somebody and they're telling you stuff and this question starts to form in your mind,
[01:43:33.520 --> 01:43:45.520]  and it's, bam, they give you the answer, you think. This guy's really smart because he's thinking what I'm thinking. Okay, this is Randy Kelton.
[01:43:45.520 --> 01:44:03.520]  We'll be right back on the other side, John. We have to move along. We've got a couple more callers and only one second we'll be right back.
[01:44:15.520 --> 01:44:22.520]  Micro plant powder is rich in silica and probiotics to help rebuild the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[01:44:22.520 --> 01:44:27.520]  Micro plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:44:27.520 --> 01:44:35.520]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org and remember all of our products are chemical free and healthy to eat.
[01:44:35.520 --> 01:44:44.520]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality and rapid shipping anywhere, and we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:44:44.520 --> 01:44:53.520]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912-608. That's 908-6912-608.
[01:44:53.520 --> 01:44:59.520]  See what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:44:59.520 --> 01:45:03.520]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.520 --> 01:45:15.520]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.520 --> 01:45:22.520]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.520 --> 01:45:27.520]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.520 --> 01:45:33.520]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:33.520 --> 01:45:42.520]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.520 --> 01:45:51.520]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more.
[01:45:51.520 --> 01:46:00.520]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:21.520 --> 01:46:43.520]  Okay, we're back. We're in our last segment and we're talking to Don in California.
[01:46:43.520 --> 01:46:53.520]  John, what was the nature of the complaints that you have?
[01:46:53.520 --> 01:47:01.520]  Well, the question that I have right now is dealing with debt buyers. I have debt buyers that are buying a bunch of credit and coming after me for them.
[01:47:01.520 --> 01:47:03.520]  One in particular...
[01:47:03.520 --> 01:47:08.520]  Oh, wait a minute. Have you looked at the Mike Muiris method?
[01:47:08.520 --> 01:47:13.520]  I just saw or started seeing that tonight when I went on your website.
[01:47:13.520 --> 01:47:22.520]  Okay, Mike Muiris will show you how to get these guys to pay you money to get you to go away and quit beating them up.
[01:47:22.520 --> 01:47:28.520]  Well, I understand, but I've got a situation on my hand. I need to ask a question about something I did.
[01:47:28.520 --> 01:47:30.520]  Okay, Doug, go ahead.
[01:47:30.520 --> 01:47:40.520]  What happened was, I did not respond to the letters that I got from the attorney hired by the debt buyer. He then filed a complaint.
[01:47:40.520 --> 01:47:48.520]  Wait a minute. Are you talking about the letter that says that if you don't respond to this within 30 days, we'll presume that the debt is valid.
[01:47:48.520 --> 01:47:50.520]  Is that the letter you're talking about?
[01:47:50.520 --> 01:47:51.520]  That's correct.
[01:47:51.520 --> 01:47:54.520]  Okay, well, here's the deal about that one.
[01:47:54.520 --> 01:47:55.520]  Sorry?
[01:47:55.520 --> 01:48:07.520]  Here's the deal about that particular matter. Well, Bubba, you can presume anything you want to. That place has no legal duty on me.
[01:48:07.520 --> 01:48:09.520]  Right, that's why I didn't worry about it. I was not worried about it.
[01:48:09.520 --> 01:48:15.520]  Anyway, he filed a complaint. I got the complaint. I read it. I didn't understand it.
[01:48:15.520 --> 01:48:29.520]  In it, it looked like I had a court date, and I was so busy with the state problems we're having here because of the death, the murder of my brother-in-law and the death of my mother-in-law.
[01:48:29.520 --> 01:48:42.520]  I figured I'd just deal with it later. In the meantime, halfway through this process, I get a notice in the mail that he is asking for a clerk's default judgment because I didn't respond to the complaint.
[01:48:42.520 --> 01:48:51.520]  I then immediately sent him a cease and desist letter and a demand for a debt validation, which he ignored.
[01:48:51.520 --> 01:49:00.520]  He filed it and are pursuing me, and now a second attorney is now coming after me to enforce that judgment.
[01:49:00.520 --> 01:49:09.520]  Okay, you need to file a motion challenging notice. Will you ever serve this subpoena?
[01:49:09.520 --> 01:49:11.520]  Well, it says notice to appear.
[01:49:11.520 --> 01:49:16.520]  Yeah, okay. You were served the notice to appear by a process server?
[01:49:16.520 --> 01:49:31.520]  On the first one, I was. On the second one, I came to my door and there was something stuck in my door, which was about three weeks dated prior, and it was the notice to appear on this other attorney coming after me.
[01:49:31.520 --> 01:49:41.520]  Okay, okay, you need to. The one thing that the courts will generally approve is a challenge to proper notice.
[01:49:41.520 --> 01:49:49.520]  Okay, the debt validation letter is too late for that once they file suit.
[01:49:49.520 --> 01:49:57.520]  If you didn't show up and they got a judgment, then you can now you go back and say, what is this all about?
[01:49:57.520 --> 01:50:02.520]  If we receive proper notice and they will say, will we hung it on the door? What door?
[01:50:02.520 --> 01:50:08.520]  Well, that's the food store. What are you talking about? I don't know anything about that. That is not sufficient service.
[01:50:08.520 --> 01:50:13.520]  It is sufficient service if no one challenges the issue.
[01:50:13.520 --> 01:50:14.520]  I understand that.
[01:50:14.520 --> 01:50:19.520]  So challenge service that will probably get it overturned.
[01:50:19.520 --> 01:50:22.520]  It won't overturn the judgment authority.
[01:50:22.520 --> 01:50:28.520]  That will overturn the judgment because the judgment was gotten without proper notice.
[01:50:28.520 --> 01:50:34.520]  No, that one would go ahead proper notice. There was a debt. There was a service processor that came to the door and I accepted that.
[01:50:34.520 --> 01:50:42.520]  Okay, was there a, okay, so that whole case, what happened yet? Are you talking about two separate issues?
[01:50:42.520 --> 01:50:46.520]  I'm talking about a sequential period of going on the same issue.
[01:50:46.520 --> 01:50:59.520]  Okay, if a second hearing was held and you didn't receive proper notice for that hearing, then everything from that point on would be voided.
[01:50:59.520 --> 01:51:03.520]  Well, that's true, but I accepted the notice.
[01:51:03.520 --> 01:51:05.520]  Okay, the one they hung in your door.
[01:51:05.520 --> 01:51:16.520]  No, no, I guess I've confused you. The first one, I didn't respond to the 30 date notice letters. I didn't respond to the phone call.
[01:51:16.520 --> 01:51:24.520]  He then filed what I call a complaint, which is the summons that you're being sued. I accepted that from a process server.
[01:51:24.520 --> 01:51:36.520]  It was written as though there was a hearing date scheduled a year from the date I received it and I assumed I could just go to the court and argue it at that point.
[01:51:36.520 --> 01:51:44.520]  Halfway through that year period, they filed for the clerk's default judgment for being nonresponsive.
[01:51:44.520 --> 01:51:48.520]  Now they've got the judgment and that judgment.
[01:51:48.520 --> 01:51:59.520]  My understanding is I can actually reopen that case, but in the meantime, another attorney closer to me has been hired to enforce that judgment.
[01:51:59.520 --> 01:52:07.520]  He's the one who was in proper notice. Somebody just hung it on my door.
[01:52:07.520 --> 01:52:18.520]  Okay, has he called you? Has he taken any actions that will allow you to go after him under Fairdeck Collections Practices Act?
[01:52:18.520 --> 01:52:27.520]  The first group of attorneys out of San Jose, California were calling me all the time and they were always leaving messages on my phone.
[01:52:27.520 --> 01:52:38.520]  Did you give them any kind of communication directing them not to contact you by phone?
[01:52:38.520 --> 01:52:46.520]  But then they kept calling me even after that to try to get me to make a deal on the judgment.
[01:52:46.520 --> 01:53:01.520]  Okay, I don't think we'll have FDCPA at this point because FDCPA doesn't apply because they're collecting your judgment and that's not a debt collector.
[01:53:01.520 --> 01:53:04.520]  Well, I should be able to avoid that judgment.
[01:53:04.520 --> 01:53:17.520]  Yeah, if you can avoid the judgment. Did they make any effort to collect the debt prior to filing suits?
[01:53:17.520 --> 01:53:20.520]  Well, just the phone calls.
[01:53:20.520 --> 01:53:27.520]  Okay, did you have a debt validation letter in place when you were getting the phone calls?
[01:53:27.520 --> 01:53:36.520]  No, I did that subsequent when I found out that when I went back and re-read their notice to appear at the court date, it wasn't really that.
[01:53:36.520 --> 01:53:51.520]  Okay, you do have a problem in not responding to the subpoena to the original petition. You needed to answer the original petition.
[01:53:51.520 --> 01:53:54.520]  I understand that.
[01:53:54.520 --> 01:53:59.520]  Okay, and you're saying you can get that overturned. You can get the judgment over it.
[01:53:59.520 --> 01:54:04.520]  I misunderstood that I had a court date. The way I read it, I had a court date.
[01:54:04.520 --> 01:54:09.520]  Halfway through, they're saying I'm not responding. Well, I figured I ought to go to court.
[01:54:09.520 --> 01:54:19.520]  Okay, once you're served with the petition, you have generally to the Monday after the 20th day to file an answer.
[01:54:19.520 --> 01:54:29.520]  Now, if you don't... I didn't. Okay, if you don't file an answer, then you stipulate to all the accusations.
[01:54:29.520 --> 01:54:31.520]  Well, I didn't know that.
[01:54:31.520 --> 01:54:35.520]  Yeah, that won't help you when you get to...
[01:54:35.520 --> 01:54:41.520]  The system is a federal action and not a state action.
[01:54:41.520 --> 01:54:45.520]  They filed in the federal court and not the state court.
[01:54:45.520 --> 01:54:51.520]  The local court? Yeah, okay, that's what I was expecting to file.
[01:54:51.520 --> 01:55:02.520]  So, it is a state issue and you were subject to the rules of court, state rules of court, and you had a certain amount of time to answer.
[01:55:02.520 --> 01:55:13.520]  And not knowing that is not going to be a affirmative defense.
[01:55:13.520 --> 01:55:15.520]  Okay.
[01:55:15.520 --> 01:55:23.520]  What may be still is if they have to be able to prove up agency, is this...
[01:55:23.520 --> 01:55:29.520]  Okay, this is like a credit card or just a revolving death or all community to close in it?
[01:55:29.520 --> 01:55:33.520]  Well, credit cards are gone. This all happened some time ago.
[01:55:33.520 --> 01:55:38.520]  Okay, okay, this is based... Okay, I'm trying to figure out where it was. It's based on credit cards, so...
[01:55:38.520 --> 01:55:40.520]  All on security.
[01:55:40.520 --> 01:55:43.520]  Hey, Randy, can I jump in here?
[01:55:43.520 --> 01:55:44.520]  Yes.
[01:55:44.520 --> 01:55:51.520]  I just... Folks, I just walked in. I've been working on the movie, Noble Lie. I heard this discussion.
[01:55:51.520 --> 01:56:02.520]  John, I've been listening to what's happened with you and it sounds to me like a one potential solution is regarding the Mike Muiris method, his course.
[01:56:02.520 --> 01:56:07.520]  What he does in situations like this where somebody has a default judgment against them...
[01:56:07.520 --> 01:56:08.520]  Right.
[01:56:08.520 --> 01:56:10.520]  Are they on your credit report?
[01:56:10.520 --> 01:56:12.520]  Oh, I'm sure they're all over it.
[01:56:12.520 --> 01:56:20.520]  Okay, okay. If the first thing you need to sign up for is a service like Privacy Guards, you can have access to your credit report on a regular basis.
[01:56:20.520 --> 01:56:31.520]  If they're on your credit report, what you need to do is you send them a dispute letter disputing the debt and demanding them to get out of your credit report.
[01:56:31.520 --> 01:56:46.520]  You can send that to the credit agencies too. And if they don't mark the debt or the account in dispute on your credit report, they're required to do that by law if you dispute the account.
[01:56:46.520 --> 01:56:57.520]  And it's not good enough to say if they mark it in dispute reported by the consumer. They have to mark it in dispute reported by the subscriber.
[01:56:57.520 --> 01:57:05.520]  And if they don't do that, then you've just set them up to sue them under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
[01:57:05.520 --> 01:57:16.520]  All right. And then you go ahead and then you sue them under FCRA for reporting inaccurate and erroneous information and incorrect information on your credit report.
[01:57:16.520 --> 01:57:29.520]  You can sue them for $1,000 a month per credit agency. That's three grand a month. You let a few months go by. You file a lawsuit and then you pressure them into a settlement under FCRA.
[01:57:29.520 --> 01:57:43.520]  And as part of the settlement that you try to pressure them into in your lawsuit, you tell them, I'm not going to settle this lawsuit unless you agree to vacate the default judgment you have against me from this other case.
[01:57:43.520 --> 01:57:54.520]  That's what he does. And so it's a pressuring technique to force them to make a deal with you in the FCRA suit that you would file as a plaintiff.
[01:57:54.520 --> 01:58:00.520]  As part of the settlement, you've forced them to vacate the judgment voluntarily.
[01:58:00.520 --> 01:58:01.520]  Okay.
[01:58:01.520 --> 01:58:18.520]  All right. So that is one option. So you may want to give Mike Mears an email and let him know what's going on and get the course. But I mean, other than that, I don't see how you're going to get that default judgment vacated against you.
[01:58:18.520 --> 01:58:19.520]  Okay.
[01:58:19.520 --> 01:58:20.520]  Okay.
[01:58:20.520 --> 01:58:21.520]  All right.
[01:58:21.520 --> 01:58:23.520]  All right. Thanks. All right.
[01:58:23.520 --> 01:58:27.520]  All right. Go ahead, guys.
[01:58:27.520 --> 01:58:37.520]  Okay. I appreciate you stepping in because this is not my area. Not as knowledgeable.
[01:58:37.520 --> 01:58:39.520]  Okay. This is Randy Kelton.
[01:58:39.520 --> 01:58:59.520]  Thank you all for listening. We'll be back Monday with Deborah and Eddie on Eddie's traffic show. And I'll be back with her whole gang on Thursday night. Thank you for listening and good night.
[01:58:59.520 --> 01:59:17.520]  Bible for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament recovery version. The New Testament recovery version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:17.520 --> 01:59:39.520]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:39.520 --> 01:59:59.520]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.