ROL_2011-10-06_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:04.960]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[00:04.960 --> 00:10.160]  The UN Thursday raised its tally of people killed during the seven-month-old uprising
[00:10.160 --> 00:17.400]  in Syria to more than 2,900, an increase of 200 people since the beginning of September.
[00:17.400 --> 00:22.480]  Clashes have broken out recently between Syrian Army deserters and troops loyal to President
[00:22.480 --> 00:24.240]  Bashar al-Assad.
[00:24.240 --> 00:29.760]  Life deserters and seven loyalists were killed Thursday and clashes in Idlib province in
[00:29.760 --> 00:32.600]  northwest Syria.
[00:32.600 --> 00:37.840]  Demonstrators packed San Francisco's financial district Wednesday joining a growing movement
[00:37.840 --> 00:43.040]  whose followers say the nation's financial system is broken and its distribution of wealth
[00:43.040 --> 00:44.120]  unfair.
[00:44.120 --> 00:50.080]  The Occupy San Francisco movement began September 17th when six people gathered outside the
[00:50.080 --> 00:55.440]  former Bank of America Center in solidarity with protesters in New York who set up camp
[00:55.440 --> 00:56.440]  near Wall Street.
[00:56.440 --> 00:59.280]  Since then, the movement has swelled.
[00:59.280 --> 01:04.640]  Similar occupations are underway in Boston, L.A. and D.C.
[01:04.640 --> 01:09.960]  Data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics finds that milk prices throughout the northeast
[01:09.960 --> 01:13.160]  are 19% higher than two years ago.
[01:13.160 --> 01:19.000]  In New York City, the average price of a gallon of milk is $4, out of reach for many low-income
[01:19.000 --> 01:20.080]  New Yorkers.
[01:20.080 --> 01:25.760]  The charity Milk from the Heart began doling out milk in February, and Harlem long milk
[01:25.760 --> 01:32.320]  lines form around the charity's fan as it makes its weekly deliveries.
[01:32.320 --> 01:37.520]  Environmental groups sued the U.S. government Wednesday to stop the clearing of grasslands,
[01:37.520 --> 01:42.800]  the moving of threatened species and other work going on ahead of U.S. approval of Trans
[01:42.800 --> 01:46.760]  Canada's $7 billion Keystone XL Pipeline.
[01:46.760 --> 01:53.680]  As built, the XL will carry 500,000 barrels per day of heavy crude from Canada's oil sands
[01:53.680 --> 01:55.560]  to refineries in Texas.
[01:55.560 --> 02:00.160]  The environmental groups filed suit against the State Department and the Fish and Wildlife
[02:00.160 --> 02:04.840]  Service to stop construction on the 1,700-mile pipeline.
[02:04.840 --> 02:09.680]  The groups say the State Department and the Fish and Wildlife Service have quietly allowed
[02:09.680 --> 02:15.480]  Trans Canada to do the work, including mowing a corridor of native prairie grasslands in
[02:15.480 --> 02:21.360]  Nebraska's ecologically sensitive Sands Hill region.
[02:21.360 --> 02:27.560]  Inside climate news reported Wednesday, documents filed with Canada's Energy Board cast doubt
[02:27.560 --> 02:33.640]  on claims by Koch Industries that it has no interest in the Keystone XL Pipeline.
[02:33.640 --> 02:38.800]  In recent months, Koch Industries, the business conglomerate run by the billionaire brothers
[02:38.800 --> 02:44.080]  Charles and David Koch, has repeatedly told the U.S. Congress and the news media that
[02:44.080 --> 02:49.280]  the proposed mega pipeline has, quote, nothing to do with any of our businesses.
[02:49.280 --> 02:55.560]  But in 2009, Flint Hill Resources, an Alberta-based subsidiary of Koch Industries, applied for
[02:55.560 --> 03:01.280]  and won Intervenor Status in the National Energy Board hearings that led to Canada's
[03:01.280 --> 03:24.360]  2010 approval of its portion of the pipeline.
[03:24.360 --> 03:43.760]  That's all, what you want, what you don't, what you don't do, when every sunroof comes
[03:43.760 --> 03:59.080]  out, what you're gonna do, what you're gonna do, what you gonna do, what you gonna do,
[03:59.080 --> 04:09.780]  what you gonna do, when you were eight and you had bad dreams, you'd go to school and
[04:09.780 --> 04:16.900]  learn the golden rule, so why are you acting like a bloody fool if you're getting sick
[04:16.900 --> 04:18.480]  and want the tools?
[04:18.480 --> 04:23.480]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:23.480 --> 04:29.960]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do, when you were
[04:29.960 --> 04:35.100]  eight and you had bad dreams, you'd go to school and learned the golden rule, so why
[04:35.100 --> 04:36.260]  are you acting like a bloody fool if you get chauffe iteration two problem, bad boys, bad
[04:36.260 --> 04:37.260]  boys, whatcha gonna do?
[04:37.260 --> 04:38.260]  Whatcha gonna do, or whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:38.260 --> 04:39.260]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do?
[04:39.260 --> 04:39.460]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do?
[04:39.460 --> 04:47.260]  As we explained on Monday, we are furiously, feverishly doing everything we can to try to
[04:47.260 --> 04:54.420]  get him out of this mess, and we are running into some statutory snags that Eddie is going
[04:54.420 --> 04:56.960]  to explain tonight.
[04:56.960 --> 05:04.640]  We are going to be taking your calls 512-646-1984 and was planning on having very special guest
[05:04.640 --> 05:11.060]  meteorologist Scott Stevens on tonight to discuss chemtrails and how the chemtrails are causing
[05:11.060 --> 05:12.060]  the drought.
[05:12.060 --> 05:18.660]  We have irrefutable proof of this, and Scott broke the bombshell news to me on the phone
[05:18.660 --> 05:24.060]  a little while ago that all weather is faked.
[05:24.060 --> 05:28.220]  All weather is geo-engineered and has been for 20 years.
[05:28.220 --> 05:33.660]  There is not one single weather system that is not controlled and manipulated, and I was
[05:33.660 --> 05:37.500]  flabbergasted, and he said he is going to offer the proof next Thursday.
[05:37.500 --> 05:41.140]  I knew they were controlling the weather, but I didn't know they were controlling all of
[05:41.140 --> 05:42.140]  the weather.
[05:42.140 --> 05:44.780]  Anyways, we had to reschedule Scott.
[05:44.780 --> 05:47.540]  He will be on next Thursday.
[05:47.540 --> 05:50.860]  His website is weatherwars.info.
[05:50.860 --> 05:53.140]  He has been studying this stuff for quite a long time.
[05:53.140 --> 05:56.660]  He is very reputable, has a lot of credibility.
[05:56.660 --> 06:00.860]  So folks, you do not want to miss next Thursday's show with Scott Stevens.
[06:00.860 --> 06:05.300]  Also going to have another special friend of ours on Mr. Phil Wiseman.
[06:05.300 --> 06:07.820]  He was a professional competition hang glider.
[06:07.820 --> 06:12.540]  He is going to talk about his study of the weather and what he has seen in the last few
[06:12.540 --> 06:13.860]  years as well.
[06:13.860 --> 06:22.460]  In the meantime, if you would like to call in, 512-646-1984, and Eddie is going to discuss
[06:22.460 --> 06:27.260]  some of the more intricate details of what we are having to deal with in Randy's case.
[06:27.260 --> 06:31.180]  And folks, please, we need donations desperately.
[06:31.180 --> 06:36.460]  The transcript for Randy's trial is $3,000.
[06:36.460 --> 06:42.300]  We need to get that transcript if we are going to properly write the documents that we need
[06:42.300 --> 06:47.020]  to write for his motion for new trial and the habeas and the appeal and all these things.
[06:47.020 --> 06:51.980]  We have got to have that transcript or at least the sections of the government witnesses.
[06:51.980 --> 06:54.340]  We really need the entire transcript.
[06:54.340 --> 06:59.060]  We don't have anywhere near the money yet for the transcript, much less an appeal bond,
[06:59.060 --> 07:01.900]  which is likely going to be at least $10,000.
[07:01.900 --> 07:04.380]  And folks, we have to stay on the air too.
[07:04.380 --> 07:10.220]  We can't let the radio network go down while Randy is in the clink, so to speak.
[07:10.220 --> 07:12.740]  He won't have a show to come back to.
[07:12.740 --> 07:15.740]  He was significantly financially supporting the network.
[07:15.740 --> 07:20.100]  And now all of us are going to have to pick up the slack.
[07:20.100 --> 07:21.100]  That means you.
[07:21.100 --> 07:22.100]  That means me.
[07:22.100 --> 07:26.700]  If you look at the chip in on ruleoflawradio.com, it shows that we've had 14 contributors
[07:26.700 --> 07:27.700]  since Monday.
[07:27.700 --> 07:32.540]  Folks, I know there's more than 14 of you out there listening.
[07:32.540 --> 07:34.980]  Please, any little thing will help.
[07:34.980 --> 07:35.980]  Even $5.
[07:35.980 --> 07:38.620]  I got a donation from somebody for $5.
[07:38.620 --> 07:39.620]  They were apologizing.
[07:39.620 --> 07:41.060]  They couldn't send more.
[07:41.060 --> 07:42.980]  Don't apologize.
[07:42.980 --> 07:44.420]  Every little bit helps.
[07:44.420 --> 07:47.380]  I mean, I know we've got thousands of listeners out there.
[07:47.380 --> 07:51.860]  If each one of you gave us $10, we could probably reach our goal.
[07:51.860 --> 07:56.340]  So please, folks, please help out any little bit you can.
[07:56.340 --> 07:58.580]  It will not be.
[07:58.580 --> 08:00.180]  We will not snub our nose at it.
[08:00.180 --> 08:01.740]  It will not be despised.
[08:01.740 --> 08:06.220]  Any donation at all will be greatly appreciated right now.
[08:06.220 --> 08:07.220]  Okay.
[08:07.220 --> 08:12.300]  So with that being said, Eddie, why don't you give us the lowdown on these statutory
[08:12.300 --> 08:13.300]  snags?
[08:13.300 --> 08:14.300]  Okay.
[08:14.300 --> 08:19.340]  Well, I've been going through this and there are several problems on how to rectify Randy's
[08:19.340 --> 08:21.060]  incarceration.
[08:21.060 --> 08:26.380]  The first thing is, as we know from the paperwork that the trial court lacked any and all jurisdiction
[08:26.380 --> 08:33.740]  to hold a trial at all, which made the order that incarcerated him void on its face.
[08:33.740 --> 08:38.100]  Now, this leaves us in a kind of a quandary here.
[08:38.100 --> 08:43.100]  And the reason is there's two ways to get Randy out, depending upon whether or not the
[08:43.100 --> 08:48.460]  conviction is valid, which we know it isn't, or whether or not we intend to use a habeas
[08:48.460 --> 08:50.940]  corpus to get him out.
[08:50.940 --> 08:56.140]  The problem with a motion for new trial is, one, the trial court didn't have jurisdiction
[08:56.140 --> 08:59.460]  to hold a trial at all in the very beginning.
[08:59.460 --> 09:04.860]  The entire judicial order committing him to jail and every act associated with it is void
[09:04.860 --> 09:11.140]  on its face, but he's being held against his will by a group of armed individuals that
[09:11.140 --> 09:17.180]  are relying on a bogus order from a bogus judge to keep Randy locked up.
[09:17.180 --> 09:23.500]  It sounds like the perfect conditions in which to bring in a habeas corpus.
[09:23.500 --> 09:29.060]  When you read chapter 11 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, we're given the indication that
[09:29.060 --> 09:34.740]  any magistrate in the entire state can hear a writ of habeas corpus.
[09:34.740 --> 09:42.180]  The problem is, is the rules of statutory construction have to kick in through this process,
[09:42.180 --> 09:44.940]  just like they do anywhere else.
[09:44.940 --> 09:49.460]  When it begins to speak of the habeas corpus, the Code of Criminal Procedure is speaking
[09:49.460 --> 09:52.220]  in generic terms.
[09:52.220 --> 09:57.540]  When it says any magistrate, it means that any magistrate in any county is eligible to
[09:57.540 --> 09:59.900]  hear a habeas corpus.
[09:59.900 --> 10:08.860]  That does not default to the fact that any magistrate can hear any habeas corpus, at
[10:08.860 --> 10:13.660]  least not when you get down to some specifics further down in the statute.
[10:13.660 --> 10:18.660]  The one we have a problem with here is Article 11.09.
[10:18.660 --> 10:23.980]  They have charged Randy with a Class A misdemeanor.
[10:23.980 --> 10:30.500]  That's one year maximum in the county jail, $4,000 fine in this particular instance.
[10:30.500 --> 10:32.460]  Here's the problem.
[10:32.460 --> 10:39.700]  Article 11.09 reads this way, applicant charged with misdemeanor.
[10:39.700 --> 10:46.300]  If a person is confined on a charge of misdemeanor, he may apply to the county judge of the county
[10:46.300 --> 10:52.620]  in which the misdemeanor is charged to have been committed, or if there be no county judge
[10:52.620 --> 10:57.740]  in said county, then to the county judge whose residence is nearest to the courthouse of
[10:57.740 --> 11:02.100]  the county in which the applicant is held in custody.
[11:02.100 --> 11:06.380]  The problem here is, is there is a judge in the county where the offense is alleged to
[11:06.380 --> 11:15.700]  have occurred, and it's the same judge that railroaded Randy to jail in the first place.
[11:15.700 --> 11:24.460]  This statute robs any other magistrate of jurisdiction to hear this particular habeas corpus, because
[11:24.460 --> 11:30.740]  there's nothing in the statute that qualifies any other magistrate to hear a misdemeanor
[11:30.740 --> 11:37.540]  habeas other than the one in the county where the alleged misdemeanor occurred.
[11:37.540 --> 11:43.420]  Now granted, we can make an argument here that this specifically deals with someone
[11:43.420 --> 11:52.980]  that's incarcerated prior to trial rather than after conviction, but there's no language
[11:52.980 --> 11:58.700]  here that gives us that specific argument to make.
[11:58.700 --> 12:05.060]  We can theorize it, and we can throw it out there, but that would mean some higher court
[12:05.060 --> 12:09.820]  would have to argue against us or for us as to whether or not it's right before it would
[12:09.820 --> 12:13.660]  do Randy any good at all.
[12:13.660 --> 12:21.460]  So as you can see right now, this situation has left us trying to do everything at once.
[12:21.460 --> 12:25.380]  We're going to go ahead and file the motion for new trial.
[12:25.380 --> 12:32.180]  We're also going to go ahead and convert that motion for new trial into a habeas corpus.
[12:32.180 --> 12:38.700]  We're going to try to get that into the hands of some attorney that would willingly take
[12:38.700 --> 12:46.420]  it to some appellate court and see if he can get the appellate court to overturn the court
[12:46.420 --> 12:50.100]  order that has Randy incarcerated.
[12:50.100 --> 12:55.460]  So that is the issues that we're looking at here in relation to Randy's case on how to
[12:55.460 --> 12:57.740]  proceed.
[12:57.740 --> 13:02.300]  There's all kinds of things to do when the judgment is void.
[13:02.300 --> 13:08.940]  The problem is, is it relies on the people within the county or wherever the dealings
[13:08.940 --> 13:17.140]  are going on to honor the law and to follow it in those cases.
[13:17.140 --> 13:20.700]  These people in Cherokee County didn't follow the law to put him in jail.
[13:20.700 --> 13:25.700]  They're surely not going to follow the law to let him out.
[13:25.700 --> 13:29.340]  They got what they wanted, which was Randy locked up.
[13:29.340 --> 13:34.460]  They made an example of Randy to anybody else that would dare to come to Cherokee County
[13:34.460 --> 13:40.380]  and poke their nose into their business to show that they're a bunch of crooks acting
[13:40.380 --> 13:49.500]  illegally under state authority of any kind or county authority or city authority.
[13:49.500 --> 13:54.980]  And if there are people in Jacksonville or any part of Cherokee County listening to this
[13:54.980 --> 13:59.180]  and you're part of the problem rather than the solution, I'm going to tell you right
[13:59.180 --> 14:02.940]  now, shame on you.
[14:02.940 --> 14:09.860]  And may all that you deserve from these actions be yours to be had just as soon as possible
[14:09.860 --> 14:18.740]  just like these individuals in Cherokee County need to be in prison so do all of those that
[14:18.740 --> 14:29.300]  look the other way and let this public corruption begin, grow, fester and destroy countless
[14:29.300 --> 14:35.220]  lives in that county for the past five or six decades.
[14:35.220 --> 14:40.460]  This is what the power of the people is supposed to prevent.
[14:40.460 --> 14:47.100]  And when you're not acting to prevent it, you're not a part of the solution.
[14:47.100 --> 14:51.400]  And right now I can't think of anybody in Cherokee County other than those that they're
[14:51.400 --> 14:58.100]  already after that have done anything to be a part of the solution.
[14:58.100 --> 15:04.140]  So if we actually have any real attorneys out there that want some details about exactly
[15:04.140 --> 15:07.980]  what level of corruption we're talking about here.
[15:07.980 --> 15:17.420]  If you will send me an email to eddie, eddie at ruleoflongradio.com, I will be more than
[15:17.420 --> 15:22.820]  happy to send you a copy of the motion for new trial or the habeas corpus we're trying
[15:22.820 --> 15:30.020]  to do for Randy Kelton so that you will have firsthand knowledge of the details of exactly
[15:30.020 --> 15:32.620]  what was done.
[15:32.620 --> 15:38.420]  Both the rent and the motion contain copies of the only complaint that's been sworn to
[15:38.420 --> 15:47.300]  in the file and it was the affidavit for probable cause to get the warrant and the information
[15:47.300 --> 15:51.060]  signed by the county attorney.
[15:51.060 --> 16:01.660]  Neither of these documents state a single fact or any element of a charge that is required
[16:01.660 --> 16:06.300]  to be proven at trial anywhere in them.
[16:06.300 --> 16:11.340]  They are completely and wholly deficient on their face.
[16:11.340 --> 16:18.100]  They are as void as the incarceration or the commitment order this judge made for Randy
[16:18.100 --> 16:23.180]  to the county sheriff in Cherokee County.
[16:23.180 --> 16:29.980]  So if there are any actual attorneys out there that don't believe the system is stacked against
[16:29.980 --> 16:37.780]  those that would work against the corruption, who give me the opportunity to give you truth.
[16:37.780 --> 16:43.540]  Alright folks, this is rule of law radio, Eddie Craig, Randy Kelton, when we get him
[16:43.540 --> 16:45.900]  back, Deborah Stevens.
[16:45.900 --> 16:47.780]  This is our Thursday night show.
[16:47.780 --> 16:50.180]  We'll be right back on the other side of the break.
[16:50.180 --> 16:53.940]  512-646-1984 is the call in number.
[16:53.940 --> 17:01.740]  So folks, line up, get in, get your questions and comments and we'll be right back.
[17:01.740 --> 17:05.260]  Capital Corn and Bullion is a family owned and operated business that has helped many
[17:05.260 --> 17:10.180]  families and friends in protecting their assets and we would like to do the same for you.
[17:10.180 --> 17:16.460]  In addition to coins and bullion, we now offer Patriot Saves, ammunition, Berkey water products,
[17:16.460 --> 17:21.900]  gift certificates, wristbands and our new Silver Pool, a new way to guarantee silver
[17:21.900 --> 17:24.500]  by prepaying at a locked price.
[17:24.500 --> 17:27.980]  We can even help you set up a metals IRA account.
[17:27.980 --> 17:33.100]  Call us at 512-646-640 for more details.
[17:33.100 --> 17:38.620]  As always, we buy, sell and trade precious metals and cater to those with all sizes of
[17:38.620 --> 17:39.620]  coin collections.
[17:39.620 --> 17:46.700]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half a mile north of Canig, next
[17:46.700 --> 17:49.340]  to the Ikiban Sushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[17:49.340 --> 17:53.900]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 5.
[17:53.900 --> 18:00.620]  Visit us at CapitalCornandBullion.com or call 512-646-640.
[18:00.620 --> 18:05.620]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:05.620 --> 18:09.420]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[18:09.420 --> 18:13.780]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.780 --> 18:14.780]  can win two.
[18:14.780 --> 18:19.140]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using
[18:19.140 --> 18:24.860]  federal civil rights statute, what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons,
[18:24.860 --> 18:28.700]  how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit
[18:28.700 --> 18:34.140]  report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.140 --> 18:39.260]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.260 --> 18:41.380]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.380 --> 18:46.940]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[18:46.940 --> 18:49.820]  or email michaelmearris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.820 --> 18:57.620]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.620 --> 19:17.380]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now, look what we got, we asked the question, I don't
[19:17.380 --> 19:19.380]  know what that is.
[19:19.380 --> 19:31.420]  If you have any questions or comments, please give us a call.
[19:31.420 --> 19:36.580]  We are trying to raise funds for the things necessary to get Randy out of jail.
[19:36.580 --> 19:43.300]  We are also trying to raise funds to take care of the network while Randy is in jail.
[19:43.300 --> 19:46.380]  He has been a big financial supporter of the network.
[19:46.380 --> 19:53.100]  So if you are able to spare anything at all, especially on a regular basis, please consider
[19:53.100 --> 19:54.860]  donating to the network.
[19:54.860 --> 19:58.660]  We really need help to keep this going.
[19:58.660 --> 20:05.460]  We rely on you as much as we get emails and everything telling us that people are genuinely
[20:05.460 --> 20:10.660]  happy and proud of what we do and what we help them learn and understand and apply where
[20:10.660 --> 20:12.580]  they live.
[20:12.580 --> 20:14.380]  We need a little reciprocity here.
[20:14.380 --> 20:15.940]  We really do.
[20:15.940 --> 20:20.300]  And I'm not saying that none of these folks haven't ever donated, they most likely have.
[20:20.300 --> 20:25.740]  That's not my area of knowledge here for the network, but I'm sure they have.
[20:25.740 --> 20:28.580]  But right now, we're in dire need.
[20:28.580 --> 20:32.620]  And if you're able to spare us anything at all to keep this network on the air, then
[20:32.620 --> 20:35.500]  please, please do so.
[20:35.500 --> 20:38.420]  Okay, it looks like we have a caller, Deborah.
[20:38.420 --> 20:39.540]  Are we ready to go to him?
[20:39.540 --> 20:40.540]  I believe so.
[20:40.540 --> 20:42.260]  We've got Kathy from Texas.
[20:42.260 --> 20:43.940]  Kathy, thank you for calling in.
[20:43.940 --> 20:45.860]  What is your question for us tonight?
[20:45.860 --> 20:49.700]  Well, the question I have is, of course, about Randy.
[20:49.700 --> 20:58.500]  And first thing is, I have called to the county attorney's office and they told me to call
[20:58.500 --> 21:01.780]  the jail and I called the jail and I was just as nice as I could be.
[21:01.780 --> 21:03.580]  And I said, well, you know, I called here.
[21:03.580 --> 21:08.540]  I have some business with Randall Kelton and I was told I could reach him at this number.
[21:08.540 --> 21:10.540]  I just acted really dumb.
[21:10.540 --> 21:14.580]  They were just pissed off as they could be.
[21:14.580 --> 21:21.980]  So when I actually got to the jail, I said, can I talk to Randall Kelton and she goes,
[21:21.980 --> 21:22.980]  no, you can't.
[21:22.980 --> 21:24.980]  And I said, is he there?
[21:24.980 --> 21:26.980]  And she said, he's in jail.
[21:26.980 --> 21:30.980]  I said, oh, I said, really?
[21:30.980 --> 21:35.660]  And she said, I said, well, how can I get in touch with him?
[21:35.660 --> 21:37.780]  And she said, write him a letter.
[21:37.780 --> 21:40.220]  And I said, to where?
[21:40.220 --> 21:42.220]  To the jail.
[21:42.220 --> 21:43.460]  Did she give you the address?
[21:43.460 --> 21:44.460]  Yes.
[21:44.460 --> 21:49.100]  And she said to the jail and I said, where might the jail be?
[21:49.100 --> 21:53.900]  And she did proceed to give me the address and she was pretty grumpy about it.
[21:53.900 --> 21:59.380]  But I was just trying to be as innocent as possible.
[21:59.380 --> 22:03.220]  But the question that I have is, you know, she was writing a letter.
[22:03.220 --> 22:09.140]  Is there any rule in jail procedures or something?
[22:09.140 --> 22:14.060]  If we send letters or cards or things to Randy, do we know that he'll get them?
[22:14.060 --> 22:20.140]  Do we just understand automatically that they're going to be opened in red or censored?
[22:20.140 --> 22:21.140]  What goes on in jail?
[22:21.140 --> 22:24.980]  I've never had anyone in jail to write here before.
[22:24.980 --> 22:30.700]  I think that they have to give the mail to the inmates, otherwise they could get the
[22:30.700 --> 22:32.900]  postal inspector on their butt.
[22:32.900 --> 22:38.500]  But as far as opening it and reading it, I have heard that that's what they do.
[22:38.500 --> 22:41.060]  Now, is it legal for them to do that?
[22:41.060 --> 22:47.900]  I would think it's not because it's addressed to Randy, that's tampering with the mail.
[22:47.900 --> 22:52.580]  But as far as I know, every jail opens all the inmates' mail and reads it before they
[22:52.580 --> 22:53.580]  give it to the inmates.
[22:53.580 --> 22:55.500]  Well, that's what I was kind of expecting.
[22:55.500 --> 23:00.820]  The other thing that I was wondering about is, can he send mail?
[23:00.820 --> 23:08.740]  He can send mail, but again, we are still in the process of having to set that up because
[23:08.740 --> 23:16.340]  when somebody is inside jail, you have to have what's called a commissory account.
[23:16.340 --> 23:22.380]  If you want to send a letter, you have to buy stamps, you have to buy paper, you have
[23:22.380 --> 23:27.140]  to buy a pen or a pencil.
[23:27.140 --> 23:29.660]  Like we can't send him paper and pen to write on.
[23:29.660 --> 23:34.180]  He has to buy it from inside the jail.
[23:34.180 --> 23:38.940]  That's another reason why we have to raise funds because we have to put money in Randy's
[23:38.940 --> 23:43.700]  commissory account so that he will be able to write people and buy stamps and things
[23:43.700 --> 23:44.700]  like that.
[23:44.700 --> 23:49.980]  Because I was wondering if you send him a form letter like we get from all these ads
[23:49.980 --> 23:56.420]  and places, if we send him something that says, check this box and here's your return
[23:56.420 --> 24:01.620]  envelope pre-stamped and drop it in the mail, can he use a return envelope?
[24:01.620 --> 24:02.620]  I would hope so.
[24:02.620 --> 24:06.500]  I mean, it's coming in the mail, so yeah, that would be a good thing to do.
[24:06.500 --> 24:11.380]  Because I'm thinking that if every single listener sends him one piece of mail with
[24:11.380 --> 24:19.700]  a return envelope, stamps, even just sent back to the radio station and say, I am fine,
[24:19.700 --> 24:23.180]  check yes or no, we want to hear from you.
[24:23.180 --> 24:27.980]  We certainly want to see it in his own handwriting too because the jailers could just check the
[24:27.980 --> 24:28.980]  box, yes.
[24:28.980 --> 24:33.460]  Yeah, but that's what I mean, it's like, write me a note or put your name down, sign
[24:33.460 --> 24:34.460]  your name.
[24:34.460 --> 24:40.020]  Well, just be real careful, I wouldn't put it past these guys to steam the stamps off
[24:40.020 --> 24:42.420]  and sell them to him.
[24:42.420 --> 24:44.620]  And that's okay if they'll let him buy them.
[24:44.620 --> 24:50.060]  Well, it's not okay because if you bought them and you're giving it to them, they shouldn't
[24:50.060 --> 24:52.100]  turn around and make them buy it again.
[24:52.100 --> 24:53.100]  That's fraud.
[24:53.100 --> 24:54.100]  That's true.
[24:54.100 --> 24:59.860]  What I'm trying to see is, is there a way that we can just confirm that he's there?
[24:59.860 --> 25:04.460]  I think that he's there because the jail has released a visitor's list and it has three
[25:04.460 --> 25:10.060]  of Randy's closest contacts on it as I've explained on the website and Eddie is one
[25:10.060 --> 25:11.820]  of the people on the visitor's list.
[25:11.820 --> 25:16.660]  Now as far as I know, none of the three people that are actually on the visitor's list have
[25:16.660 --> 25:23.660]  actually gone to see him yet, but that is going to be happening very soon because Eddie
[25:23.660 --> 25:29.740]  and myself and Ken, we've got to get these documents to Randy for him to sign.
[25:29.740 --> 25:38.700]  So somebody should be able to confirm in person probably next week at the latest that he is
[25:38.700 --> 25:40.740]  there and that he's alive and doing okay.
[25:40.740 --> 25:46.220]  I would imagine that he is alive and that he is there and that he's somewhat okay because
[25:46.220 --> 25:50.980]  if they had whisked him away into a federal gulag and disappeared him, they wouldn't have
[25:50.980 --> 25:53.820]  posted a visitor's list.
[25:53.820 --> 25:54.820]  Yeah.
[25:54.820 --> 26:00.300]  So the visitor's list means that the people on the list have permission to go there whenever
[26:00.300 --> 26:01.500]  they want pretty much.
[26:01.500 --> 26:02.500]  I don't know if it's when they want.
[26:02.500 --> 26:05.300]  Well, during regular visiting hours and dates, yes.
[26:05.300 --> 26:07.500]  Yeah, they usually have visitor hours.
[26:07.500 --> 26:12.220]  They are the only ones that they will allow in to see Randy.
[26:12.220 --> 26:13.220]  Okay.
[26:13.220 --> 26:18.620]  Because we figured that any of us who go and start asking questions or knocking on the
[26:18.620 --> 26:22.660]  door, we probably wouldn't get out of Cherokee County without having broken tail lights or
[26:22.660 --> 26:25.460]  something and be put in right beside him.
[26:25.460 --> 26:27.020]  That's extremely possible.
[26:27.020 --> 26:31.420]  Well, that's one way to check and see if Randy's okay to go up to Cherokee County and get
[26:31.420 --> 26:32.420]  yourself arrested.
[26:32.420 --> 26:37.860]  I probably would have to go to the girl's side and I wouldn't be able to sign.
[26:37.860 --> 26:38.860]  Yeah.
[26:38.860 --> 26:39.860]  I wouldn't recommend it.
[26:39.860 --> 26:40.860]  No.
[26:40.860 --> 26:43.860]  I'm not thinking that's the best solution either.
[26:43.860 --> 26:44.860]  No.
[26:44.860 --> 26:46.860]  Eddie, watch your back when you go in.
[26:46.860 --> 26:52.540]  They already know my face, so if I go down there, they'll be looking for me.
[26:52.540 --> 26:57.620]  There's already people on the visitor's list that are right in the immediate area, so Eddie
[26:57.620 --> 26:59.980]  may not be the one that's actually going to go there.
[26:59.980 --> 27:00.980]  Okay.
[27:00.980 --> 27:03.220]  But we will keep the listeners posted.
[27:03.220 --> 27:08.940]  Like I said on the website, as soon as we have any information, I will be posting regular
[27:08.940 --> 27:10.780]  updates on the website.
[27:10.780 --> 27:11.780]  Okay.
[27:11.780 --> 27:14.860]  I am going to throw a challenge out to all the listeners.
[27:14.860 --> 27:20.540]  Put the money you can into the pot, but drop a note in the mail.
[27:20.540 --> 27:26.260]  We want to inundate that jailhouse with so many letters for Randall Kelton that they
[27:26.260 --> 27:33.420]  will think that he's a superstar because he's our star and I just challenge you all.
[27:33.420 --> 27:38.060]  My plan is one a day till he's home free.
[27:38.060 --> 27:39.780]  All right.
[27:39.780 --> 27:40.780]  Thank you, Kathy.
[27:40.780 --> 27:45.100]  So thank you all for all the efforts and call me if you need me.
[27:45.100 --> 27:46.100]  Okay.
[27:46.100 --> 27:47.100]  Thank you, Kathy.
[27:47.100 --> 27:48.100]  Thanks.
[27:48.100 --> 27:49.100]  Bye-bye.
[27:49.100 --> 27:50.100]  Okay.
[27:50.100 --> 27:51.100]  Bye-bye.
[27:51.100 --> 27:52.100]  Yeah.
[27:52.100 --> 27:57.380]  And folks, I wish that I could offer some kind of means to return people their money, especially
[27:57.380 --> 28:01.540]  concerning the appeal bond because the way appeal bonds are supposed to work is that
[28:01.540 --> 28:07.420]  you get it back when you show up at your appeal hearing, however, you don't ever get all
[28:07.420 --> 28:08.420]  of it back.
[28:08.420 --> 28:13.540]  The court is always going to take out some percentage for court costs or fees or fines.
[28:13.540 --> 28:16.660]  Right now, Randy is also facing a $4,000 fine.
[28:16.660 --> 28:23.260]  And so if you lose the appeal, the court's going to keep that minus the rest and it's
[28:23.260 --> 28:24.260]  just too complicated.
[28:24.260 --> 28:28.860]  I mean, I can't keep track of all the donors, especially when you've got so many people
[28:28.860 --> 28:31.380]  sending $5 and $10 here and there.
[28:31.380 --> 28:35.700]  I mean, it wouldn't be worth my time to try to keep track of everybody and work out some
[28:35.700 --> 28:41.860]  kind of a prorated percentage in order to return people their money considering if we're
[28:41.860 --> 28:43.580]  going to get something back from the court.
[28:43.580 --> 28:47.100]  And besides, folks, I was about to run a chip-in.
[28:47.100 --> 28:53.020]  I was about to launch a money bomb just for the network before this happened to Randy.
[28:53.020 --> 28:57.100]  I was about to launch a $5,000 money bomb just for the network.
[28:57.100 --> 28:58.980]  That's how far behind we're getting.
[28:58.980 --> 28:59.980]  And now this.
[28:59.980 --> 29:03.580]  And so we just, we really need every penny that we can get right now.
[29:03.580 --> 29:06.180]  So folks, you really do appreciate the support.
[29:06.180 --> 29:08.460]  We really do need it at this time.
[29:08.460 --> 29:11.820]  Okay, Eddie, what else?
[29:11.820 --> 29:18.580]  Well, like I said the other night, folks, please call in a couple of times a day.
[29:18.580 --> 29:23.500]  No threats, no threatening facts, no threatening mail.
[29:23.500 --> 29:29.620]  Just call the prosecutor's office, call the clerk of the court's office.
[29:29.620 --> 29:33.780]  We are not calling down there and say, hey, we want to talk to Randy.
[29:33.780 --> 29:37.780]  We're going to call down there and ask them, can you give us the information to the jail
[29:37.780 --> 29:41.540]  so that we can find out how Mr. Kelton is doing?
[29:41.540 --> 29:46.380]  We want all of these offices to know that we are watching.
[29:46.380 --> 29:48.580]  And it's not one or two people.
[29:48.580 --> 29:50.580]  It's a large number of people.
[29:50.580 --> 29:51.580]  Hi, folks.
[29:51.580 --> 30:00.220]  512-646-1984 is the call-in number, and we'll be right back after the break.
[30:00.220 --> 30:05.620]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[30:05.620 --> 30:07.700]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:07.700 --> 30:12.660]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:12.660 --> 30:16.660]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives and thousands of my fellow
[30:16.660 --> 30:18.100]  force respond as they play.
[30:18.100 --> 30:19.540]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:19.540 --> 30:20.540]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:20.540 --> 30:21.540]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[30:21.540 --> 30:22.540]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:22.540 --> 30:24.540]  I'm the father who lost his son.
[30:24.540 --> 30:27.180]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[30:27.180 --> 30:32.860]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:32.860 --> 30:35.860]  Everyone took cover when Tropical Storm Irene hit the northeast.
[30:35.860 --> 30:40.860]  I'll tell you where one massive snake hit out in New York City, and it wasn't the zoo.
[30:40.860 --> 30:46.780]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with a tale of the Brooklyn Python next.
[30:46.780 --> 30:48.380]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:48.380 --> 30:51.980]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:51.980 --> 30:56.780]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:56.780 --> 31:01.780]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[31:01.780 --> 31:04.540]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[31:04.540 --> 31:08.860]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[31:08.860 --> 31:12.340]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[31:12.340 --> 31:16.260]  Start over with StartPage.
[31:16.260 --> 31:21.380]  The morning after Tropical Storm Irene visited the northeast, New York City was pretty wet,
[31:21.380 --> 31:25.660]  but one Brooklyn tenant couldn't figure out why his ceiling wouldn't stop dripping.
[31:25.660 --> 31:30.700]  The water was coming from an eighth floor apartment above, so he called the Housing Authority.
[31:30.700 --> 31:34.620]  When they arrived, the apartment was vacant, except for the bathroom.
[31:34.620 --> 31:39.660]  There in an overflowing sink was a 10-foot-long Burmese Python.
[31:39.660 --> 31:44.220]  Pythons normally eat rats and chickens, but they've also been known to swallow alligators
[31:44.220 --> 31:47.020]  in the Everglades Hole.
[31:47.020 --> 31:51.140]  The two-year-old snake got a free ride to an animal shelter, and its owners have yet
[31:51.140 --> 31:52.820]  to ask for it back.
[31:52.820 --> 31:54.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:54.500 --> 32:24.460]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:24.500 --> 32:54.460]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[32:54.460 --> 32:56.460]  Okay, folks, we are back.
[32:56.460 --> 33:06.260]  We are taking your calls right now, 512-646-1984.
[33:06.260 --> 33:08.260]  We've got Janet from Texas.
[33:08.260 --> 33:10.660]  Janet, thank you for calling in.
[33:10.660 --> 33:12.460]  What is your question or comment for us tonight?
[33:12.460 --> 33:18.740]  Well, I just wanted to just run this by all the listeners and everything.
[33:18.740 --> 33:24.860]  For those people who really love Randy and already have studied enough about how to file
[33:24.860 --> 33:31.180]  decent filing, I think that it wouldn't hurt to file mass, you know, mass filings for judicial
[33:31.180 --> 33:36.980]  complaints against that judge who chumped up the charges.
[33:36.980 --> 33:40.100]  That's already in the works, Janet.
[33:40.100 --> 33:46.860]  What we're doing in order so that there'll be legitimate filings, Eddie is going to be
[33:46.860 --> 33:52.180]  working on putting together judicial conduct complaint against the judge and bar grievances
[33:52.180 --> 33:57.780]  against both the judge and the prosecutor, and when those are ready, we're going to post
[33:57.780 --> 34:03.140]  the download links on the ruleoflawradio.com website so folks can just print them out,
[34:03.140 --> 34:06.300]  download them, print them out, put your name on them and file them.
[34:06.300 --> 34:07.300]  Excellent.
[34:07.300 --> 34:08.300]  Excellent.
[34:08.300 --> 34:10.980]  And are those the only two types of complaints we can file?
[34:10.980 --> 34:11.980]  Pretty much.
[34:11.980 --> 34:12.980]  Yeah, pretty much.
[34:12.980 --> 34:19.860]  Administrative, yeah. Well, there'll be criminal complaints, too, but coming from out of state,
[34:19.860 --> 34:24.860]  those will be a lot harder to get recognized, but for those people that are in state, most
[34:24.860 --> 34:27.420]  assuredly they can do those.
[34:27.420 --> 34:31.420]  But those, again, it's going to take me some time to get all of the written documents we're
[34:31.420 --> 34:32.820]  going to need done.
[34:32.820 --> 34:40.620]  I will go as fast as I can in doing that, but just please watch the website, folks, and
[34:40.620 --> 34:45.900]  when those links appear, download them, fill them out, shoot them off. We'll have all the
[34:45.900 --> 34:50.340]  details in it. All you got to do is put your name and other related information in there
[34:50.340 --> 34:52.340]  and file it.
[34:52.340 --> 34:58.340]  Well, what about the officers that arrested them? Couldn't something be done with them?
[34:58.340 --> 35:03.940]  Well, as far as the people in the jails go, they can have criminal complaints lodged against
[35:03.940 --> 35:09.540]  them, and then they can be sued after the fact. But right now, they're acting on what
[35:09.540 --> 35:14.580]  they've received to be a valid order. It's not, which means they're not going to have
[35:14.580 --> 35:20.820]  any immunity from a civil suit, but at the same time, we can't go down there and force
[35:20.820 --> 35:25.540]  them to let him out, either, because they think they're operating on a good order instead
[35:25.540 --> 35:26.540]  of a bogus one.
[35:26.540 --> 35:33.620]  They've sure spent some time in court themselves proving that they're acting within the law
[35:33.620 --> 35:36.380]  and personally responsible.
[35:36.380 --> 35:42.100]  Well, that would be hard considering many of the courts today don't find anybody in
[35:42.100 --> 35:50.100]  government personally responsible for anything they do. Until we actually fix that part,
[35:50.100 --> 35:55.460]  the rest of it's not going to help us much. As long as they can do what they do with impunity,
[35:55.460 --> 35:57.460]  they will do it.
[35:57.460 --> 36:07.100]  Then also, some protests outside the jail where he's at and a little bit of local, especially
[36:07.100 --> 36:13.780]  local, an area who needs attention brought to that, so that people are understanding
[36:13.780 --> 36:20.740]  that they're putting people in jail with trumped up charges there when they are trying to stand
[36:20.740 --> 36:25.460]  up for their rights and show people what's going on when they try to uncover the evils
[36:25.460 --> 36:26.460]  that are going on.
[36:26.460 --> 36:32.660]  Well, like any good organized crime ring, they're going to gang up on whoever tries
[36:32.660 --> 36:35.060]  to expose the ring for what it is.
[36:35.060 --> 36:36.060]  Oh, yeah.
[36:36.060 --> 36:43.060]  I'll bring the tar if you'll bring the feathers, my husband says.
[36:43.060 --> 36:47.980]  Well, I'm working on finding enough trees to make some good rails. First, we ride them
[36:47.980 --> 36:51.820]  out of town on them and then we beat them into the ground like spikes with them.
[36:51.820 --> 36:57.140]  Well, you know, let me know when you're heading that direction. I'd like to ride along.
[36:57.140 --> 36:58.140]  We'll do.
[36:58.140 --> 36:59.140]  All right. Thanks, Janet.
[36:59.140 --> 37:00.140]  Thank you.
[37:00.140 --> 37:07.820]  Okay. We're taking your calls. 512-646-1984. We've got Jerry Forman is next. Jerry Forman
[37:07.820 --> 37:10.820]  from Texas, what is your question tonight?
[37:10.820 --> 37:16.500]  I have an idea that I got from Randy and you probably thought about, but if you haven't,
[37:16.500 --> 37:24.580]  use 31-cent postcards and write things that the receiver doesn't want to know in public
[37:24.580 --> 37:33.220]  and have maybe 100 postcards a day arrive and pretty soon the tide will turn like Randy
[37:33.220 --> 37:41.860]  says, it's politics. That's his idea, though, to have a postcard campaign cost 31 cents.
[37:41.860 --> 37:46.660]  They write the message so that anybody that handles it reads it. And if they get that
[37:46.660 --> 37:52.340]  message 5 times a day pretty soon, they say, hey, there's something going on here. We
[37:52.340 --> 37:59.340]  need to change. How about the county judge? Bring the county judge to you.
[37:59.340 --> 38:03.140]  What do you mean bringing the county judge in? The county judge is the one that got him
[38:03.140 --> 38:04.140]  locked up.
[38:04.140 --> 38:08.300]  The county judge, you're sure it was the county judge that locked him up?
[38:08.300 --> 38:09.300]  Yes.
[38:09.300 --> 38:13.020]  There's a county court at law, judge. That's who Fletcher is.
[38:13.020 --> 38:19.500]  Okay, but there's a county judge who is a non-attorney or could be in Texas and it's
[38:19.500 --> 38:20.740]  the county.
[38:20.740 --> 38:26.100]  That's the constitutional county court and the legislature tried to take jurisdiction
[38:26.100 --> 38:33.940]  of these types of cases completely out of that judge's hands. They are magistrates, yes,
[38:33.940 --> 38:39.940]  but their authority to hear anything related to cases like this is non-existent.
[38:39.940 --> 38:47.500]  Okay, but here's the thing. According to the constitution, the county judge, that person
[38:47.500 --> 38:52.220]  that you say doesn't have the authority anymore, according to the constitution, he does and
[38:52.220 --> 38:56.100]  he's responsible for everything that goes on in his county.
[38:56.100 --> 39:01.960]  Well then, if that's true, then we have to bring civil lawsuits against him and civil
[39:01.960 --> 39:10.260]  lawsuit remedies take sometimes years to adjudicate. Randy has been sentenced to one year in prison.
[39:10.260 --> 39:15.140]  He'll be out before the civil lawsuit even gets underway.
[39:15.140 --> 39:22.260]  What we need to do right now is pursue the criminal statutory remedies like motion for
[39:22.260 --> 39:28.620]  new trial, filing a notice of appeal, habeas, maybe a federal habeas once we exhaust all
[39:28.620 --> 39:33.620]  our remedies and law and all that sort of thing. And then once we actually are able to get
[39:33.620 --> 39:39.220]  him out, then we can go back and start filing lawsuits against everybody for either not
[39:39.220 --> 39:44.180]  doing what they were supposed to or for doing what they were not supposed to.
[39:44.180 --> 39:50.580]  The problem here, David, is very simple. In order to get that county court, the county
[39:50.580 --> 39:55.220]  judge back where they're supposed to be, we have to sue the state. That's a whole another
[39:55.220 --> 40:00.540]  suit, a whole another issue. And right now, the legislature has undermined the authority
[40:00.540 --> 40:06.820]  of that judge and the courts have upheld the legislature's undermining of that authority.
[40:06.820 --> 40:11.180]  So the only remedy we can get is from the very people that have corrupted the system
[40:11.180 --> 40:16.860]  to begin with. It's pretty much the same problem we have on how to get Randy out of this mess
[40:16.860 --> 40:17.860]  at all.
[40:17.860 --> 40:24.820]  Okay, will you do this for me? Will you post on somewhere where I can read it or email?
[40:24.820 --> 40:26.820]  Or you can read what?
[40:26.820 --> 40:35.940]  Address, work, postparts or letters could be mailed to, I believe Debra has that information.
[40:35.940 --> 40:40.500]  Everything is already posted on ruleoflawradio.com. I've been saying it all week long. All the
[40:40.500 --> 40:44.100]  information that we have is posted on ruleoflawradio.com.
[40:44.100 --> 40:50.740]  Well, this is five minutes ago, I heard that Randy was having a problem, so I'm way behind
[40:50.740 --> 40:51.740]  this.
[40:51.740 --> 40:56.100]  Go back and listen to the archive for Monday, because we talked about everything, all the
[40:56.100 --> 40:58.620]  details on Monday.
[40:58.620 --> 40:59.620]  Last Monday, okay.
[40:59.620 --> 41:01.620]  No, this, yeah, this is just this past Monday.
[41:01.620 --> 41:09.340]  But I think postcards with an important non, you know, don't implement yourself into anything,
[41:09.340 --> 41:16.860]  but if enough people say the harsh words, cool enough, pretty soon they stink in.
[41:16.860 --> 41:21.860]  Okay, thank you for the, thank you for the call, jury. David?
[41:21.860 --> 41:22.860]  Okay.
[41:22.860 --> 41:23.860]  Okay, okay, bye.
[41:23.860 --> 41:24.860]  Have a nice evening.
[41:24.860 --> 41:25.860]  Okay, bye-bye.
[41:25.860 --> 41:37.060]  David, jury foreman. Okay, folks, if you'd like to call in 512-646-1984 is the call-in number
[41:37.060 --> 41:42.420]  right now. The lines are clear, so please feel free to call in. Okay, so Eddie, back
[41:42.420 --> 41:43.420]  to you.
[41:43.420 --> 41:48.500]  Back to me. What am I good for these days except just ranting and raving about all the corruption
[41:48.500 --> 41:53.180]  we have to deal with. It doesn't matter whether it's Cherokee County, Travis County, Nacogdoches
[41:53.180 --> 41:54.180]  County.
[41:54.180 --> 42:01.940]  I'll say it again, folks. Who's going to fix this stuff if it is not us? They don't care.
[42:01.940 --> 42:08.580]  They think they can do what they want, and we let them get away with it.
[42:08.580 --> 42:13.940]  Remember, the Texas Constitution has a little article in there that says in Article 1, Section
[42:13.940 --> 42:21.140]  2, all political power is inherent in the people. We have the right to abolish or reform
[42:21.140 --> 42:29.500]  our government at any time and in any manner we deem appropriate. It does not say anywhere
[42:29.500 --> 42:36.500]  in there that the government that exists has any authority to prevent us from doing that,
[42:36.500 --> 42:43.460]  including a way we have to do that, or writing a statute that controls how we can do that.
[42:43.460 --> 42:51.780]  We have the authority without these idiots in black and their hired guns. We just have
[42:51.780 --> 43:00.500]  to realize it and put it into effect. How can the government tell the people no and
[43:00.500 --> 43:13.380]  the government be right? That has never made any sense to me whatsoever. We made them.
[43:13.380 --> 43:21.020]  We gave them every power they exercised. Well, let me rephrase that. We gave them specific
[43:21.020 --> 43:30.220]  powers to exercise, and they have quickly and quietly and sometimes completely criminally
[43:30.220 --> 43:41.580]  usurped powers far beyond any we ever intended them to have. If we don't fix it, it's over.
[43:41.580 --> 43:47.820]  We will all wind up in Randy's position one way or another, especially if we actively
[43:47.820 --> 43:55.060]  disband. All right, this is Rule of Law Radio 5126461984 is the call-in number. Give us
[43:55.060 --> 44:01.900]  a call. We'll be right back.
[44:01.900 --> 44:06.340]  The Oakland City bombing, top ten reasons to question the official story. Reason number
[44:06.340 --> 44:12.940]  two, why was the ATF AWOL? Paramedic Tiffany Bible, who's on the scene within five minutes,
[44:12.940 --> 44:17.340]  has stated in an affidavit that agents of the Bureau of Alcoholic Tobacco and Firearms told
[44:17.340 --> 44:21.740]  her that they were not in the office that morning. EMT Catherine Mallet also overheard
[44:21.740 --> 44:26.580]  one agent say to another, close, is that why we got the page to not come in today, end
[44:26.580 --> 44:31.940]  quote. Bruce Shaw, as interviewed on KSOL or TV, was also told by ATF agents that they
[44:31.940 --> 44:37.180]  had been paged to not come into work. The ATF initially denied these claims, and now
[44:37.180 --> 44:40.940]  variously claim that one of their agents was in a free-falling elevator which has been
[44:40.940 --> 44:44.580]  disproven, or that they had been in an all night stick out, or that they had been in
[44:44.580 --> 44:49.340]  a golf tournament. As they try to sort out their lies, all we want to know is, did the
[44:49.340 --> 44:54.460]  ATF receive a warning, and if so, why did they not pass it on to others in the memorable
[44:54.460 --> 45:00.820]  situations? For more information, go to okcbombintruth.com.
[45:00.820 --> 45:07.540]  At hempusa.org, we offer chemical-free products to people around the world detoxifying, self-healing
[45:07.540 --> 45:12.820]  while rebuilding the immune system. We urge our listeners to please consider our largest
[45:12.820 --> 45:18.980]  selling product, micro plant powder. Our micro plant powder is rich in silica and probiotics
[45:18.980 --> 45:24.420]  to help rebuild the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora. Micro plant powder
[45:24.420 --> 45:29.140]  is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter. We urge our
[45:29.140 --> 45:34.620]  listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org. And remember, all of our products are chemical
[45:34.620 --> 45:39.900]  free and healthy to eat. We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality
[45:39.900 --> 45:45.660]  and rapid shipping anywhere, and we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[45:45.660 --> 45:56.100]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608. That's 908-6912608. See what our powder, seeds
[45:56.100 --> 46:10.660]  and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[46:10.660 --> 46:27.780]  If you need not have any problems, where are you going to look for one? If you could not
[46:27.780 --> 46:48.820]  have one, please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608. That's 908-6912608.
[46:48.820 --> 47:16.820]  That's 908-6912608.
[47:16.820 --> 47:27.700]  Okay folks, we are back. 512-646-1984. We are taking your calls. We've got Dan in Illinois.
[47:27.700 --> 47:32.500]  Dan, thank you for calling in. What is your question or comment tonight?
[47:32.500 --> 47:37.140]  Just comment on a little idea that I had to come up with about a year or so ago to really
[47:37.140 --> 47:43.380]  put the message across when things are tight. What I ended up doing is that I got online,
[47:43.380 --> 47:49.420]  I got a list of every newspaper, whatever counties I wanted to hit. When I hit those,
[47:49.420 --> 47:55.620]  you have little spots in the newspapers where you can read commentary sections. I was typing
[47:55.620 --> 48:00.980]  what I wanted to get out there. If it was free, the number is great. Most of the time
[48:00.980 --> 48:07.340]  I want your email. For some, I'd go ahead and do that. If they wanted to pay, depending
[48:07.340 --> 48:12.620]  on the urgent it was, I would pay. It's always something minimal, but it's just a little
[48:12.620 --> 48:18.020]  bit of time. I think it took me probably about four to five minutes per paper once I got
[48:18.020 --> 48:22.740]  the swing. Whatever I wanted to put in there, I'd cut and paste in the word. I'd have it
[48:22.740 --> 48:26.900]  in word. I'd cut it out of Microsoft Word, paste it in the commentary section, blow it
[48:26.900 --> 48:34.940]  here at the next newspaper. Then after that, I got the email, the little businesses that
[48:34.940 --> 48:41.580]  were in and around the towns and did the exact same thing. I hammered and I hammered and
[48:41.580 --> 48:47.780]  I hammered and every county when we got there knew we were coming and it cost nothing but
[48:47.780 --> 48:52.820]  a little bit of time. We get a bunch of people doing that, getting these little newspapers
[48:52.820 --> 48:56.540]  with the commentary. Randy's going to be back home.
[48:56.540 --> 49:02.140]  Okay. Well, this is a great idea, Dan. If you would please, would you do this? Because
[49:02.140 --> 49:06.380]  I certainly do not have the time, even if it only takes five minutes for every single
[49:06.380 --> 49:11.580]  one of them because I have to run radio shows four hours a day and every minute of my spare
[49:11.580 --> 49:16.500]  time right now is taken up by producing this documentary film on the Oklahoma City bombing
[49:16.500 --> 49:21.100]  and I've got to finish it so that I can get paid because I've been working for free on
[49:21.100 --> 49:25.660]  the contingency up to this point and the network is failing. I need to make some money and
[49:25.660 --> 49:30.140]  also I'm working on these legal documents with Eddie trying to get Randy out and I've
[49:30.140 --> 49:34.260]  got other cases that I'm taking care of too. I'm still taking care of the micro here in
[49:34.260 --> 49:39.340]  Austin. That federal lawsuit is still ongoing. There's other federal lawsuits that I'm involved
[49:39.340 --> 49:44.180]  with so I have absolutely no time for that sort of thing and neither does Eddie but listeners
[49:44.180 --> 49:49.500]  out there, if you come up with ideas like this, please feel free. Go ahead and do it.
[49:49.500 --> 49:53.500]  Thank you very much, Dan. And anybody else out there please do the same thing. I'm doing
[49:53.500 --> 49:59.620]  it. It's really easy. Thank you. Okay. Thanks, Dan. Okay. We are going now to Brian in Minnesota.
[49:59.620 --> 50:05.300]  Brian, thank you for calling in. What is your question or comment tonight? Well, I've got
[50:05.300 --> 50:10.460]  a couple different topics to talk on. I guess one, first, I'm behind on what happened with
[50:10.460 --> 50:15.900]  Randy too so I'm curious to know if the information for the jail and all that on the information,
[50:15.900 --> 50:22.420]  I would assume. I've posted everything that we know right now on the website. All right.
[50:22.420 --> 50:28.340]  And Eddie, if you want to give a recap, you can but we spent two hours on Monday explaining
[50:28.340 --> 50:31.500]  the situation. Yeah, I'll listen to that and hopefully
[50:31.500 --> 50:35.100]  bear with me. I don't have internet connection here but as soon as I can, I'm going to send
[50:35.100 --> 50:40.740]  you some donations when I get there. Thank you. Recap's very simple. Railroad job. Only
[50:40.740 --> 50:49.860]  thing missing, tracks in the caboose. Yeah, Brian doesn't need much explanation.
[50:49.860 --> 50:54.540]  What happened was he had filed here. He had attempted to file criminal complaints in Cherokee
[50:54.540 --> 51:03.580]  County to help Robert Fox. And to be honest, I never approved of this to begin with because
[51:03.580 --> 51:10.780]  we are not here to do things for other people. We are here to teach people how to help themselves.
[51:10.780 --> 51:16.860]  And every time that Randy has tried to actually do things for other people, he's gotten himself
[51:16.860 --> 51:23.060]  in trouble. And so I just recommend to everybody to solve
[51:23.060 --> 51:27.300]  their own problems. And we will help you to help yourselves. But we are not in the business
[51:27.300 --> 51:31.620]  of writing legal documents for other people. We're not in the business of doing these sorts
[51:31.620 --> 51:38.180]  of things for other people. And so I believe that was Randy's first mistake.
[51:38.180 --> 51:45.220]  But other than that, what happened was it was a railroad job. It was a setup. At first,
[51:45.220 --> 51:52.620]  they were trying to say that, well, because he had taken information from public records
[51:52.620 --> 52:00.380]  and used them in filings as evidence that public servants had committed a crime, then
[52:00.380 --> 52:04.420]  he violated the Occupations Code because you have to have a private investigator's license
[52:04.420 --> 52:10.420]  in order to gather information to be used as evidence in court if you're gathering
[52:10.420 --> 52:15.900]  information as a business. Well, then they tried to say they brought
[52:15.900 --> 52:21.740]  in an expert witness, a state trooper from Austin, who was not personally familiar with
[52:21.740 --> 52:26.700]  the case. That's why they called him an expert witness. And the guy testified in court that,
[52:26.700 --> 52:31.140]  well, there's no way that Randy could have gotten this information that he included in
[52:31.140 --> 52:37.540]  his criminal complaints from public records. He had to have gotten it by some other means
[52:37.540 --> 52:41.820]  other than public records. And so because of that, he broke the law because you have
[52:41.820 --> 52:46.500]  to have a PI license to gather information that's not in public records in order to be
[52:46.500 --> 52:54.500]  used as evidence. But that is a totally bogus argument too because anybody can gather evidence
[52:54.500 --> 53:01.620]  or data from any means, whether it's public records or not, to use that information as
[53:01.620 --> 53:10.300]  evidence as long as you're not doing it as a business. Okay? They had no evidence whatsoever
[53:10.300 --> 53:17.540]  that Randy was engaged in a business of any kind whatsoever. Or did they produce a single
[53:17.540 --> 53:22.500]  witness to testify that they had ever hired and paid Randy to perform any such service?
[53:22.500 --> 53:26.860]  Absolutely not. Those are two mandatory elements of the offense,
[53:26.860 --> 53:31.980]  and they didn't prove either of them. That's right. Plus, they didn't prove that Randy
[53:31.980 --> 53:37.540]  actually got any information that was not in public record anyway when Randy went up
[53:37.540 --> 53:42.060]  to cross-examine, and this is secondhand information I'm telling you now from one of
[53:42.060 --> 53:46.300]  the court watchers that told me this, when Randy went up to cross-examine this so-called
[53:46.300 --> 53:50.920]  expert witness to ask him, can you please be more specific? Which paragraph of which
[53:50.920 --> 53:58.020]  page of which criminal complaint are you talking about that has information that is not part
[53:58.020 --> 54:04.260]  of public record? The prosecutor objected and the judge sustained it. So they cut Randy
[54:04.260 --> 54:09.220]  off from that line of questioning, and Randy continued to ask the questions anyway even
[54:09.220 --> 54:13.340]  though the judge sustained the objections, and then Randy got two contempt charges on
[54:13.340 --> 54:19.220]  top of everything because he kept asking the same questions anyway. And so that's the story.
[54:19.220 --> 54:27.100]  That is the short version. And now he's convicted to a class A misdemeanor one year in jail
[54:27.100 --> 54:32.020]  and a $4,000 fine, and we're doing everything we can to try to get him out. But folks, I
[54:32.020 --> 54:39.940]  have never heard of anybody filing criminal complaints regarding their own situation that
[54:39.940 --> 54:45.020]  ever got into trouble, other than I think Robert Fox, they may have retaliated against
[54:45.020 --> 54:50.980]  him. He's the only one. Everybody else, all of our listeners that have ever tried to file
[54:50.980 --> 54:57.740]  criminal complaints against public servants as a means of remedy for their own situation
[54:57.740 --> 55:03.580]  has never gotten into trouble. But I can say this, every time Randy has gone and tried
[55:03.580 --> 55:09.740]  to file criminal charges against public servants regarding somebody else's situation he's gotten
[55:09.740 --> 55:15.540]  into trouble. And he shouldn't have gotten into trouble, but I think that this should
[55:15.540 --> 55:21.340]  be a lesson to everybody that we call it every tub on their own bottom. People need to, we
[55:21.340 --> 55:27.660]  need to all pull up our own bootstraps and take care of our own situations and be responsible
[55:27.660 --> 55:31.700]  and that's why I say we're not here to do things for other people. We're here to help
[55:31.700 --> 55:37.740]  people help themselves. And I'm not blaming Randy by any means. He didn't do anything
[55:37.740 --> 55:42.300]  wrong. He didn't break any laws, but we are here to help people help themselves. We're
[55:42.300 --> 55:47.420]  not here to do things for other people. So it is a sad situation all around. Anything
[55:47.420 --> 55:48.420]  else, Brian?
[55:48.420 --> 55:54.020]  Well, and a tough situation. I'm going to stop typing right now is what I'm going to
[55:54.020 --> 56:00.140]  do because I was probably just about to fill out a few criminal complaints by self and
[56:00.140 --> 56:02.300]  maybe I need to heed your warning.
[56:02.300 --> 56:07.380]  Well, no, I'm not trying to tell people not to file. I mean, if you have a friend that's
[56:07.380 --> 56:13.020]  in trouble, why don't you teach your friend how to file his own criminal complaints? You
[56:13.020 --> 56:18.860]  know, I mean, in Texas you can file a criminal complaint. You don't have to be the injured
[56:18.860 --> 56:24.340]  party to file a criminal complaint. Anybody can file a criminal complaint that has knowledge
[56:24.340 --> 56:28.580]  of a crime, especially if you're the competent fact. In fact, in Texas you don't even have
[56:28.580 --> 56:34.140]  to be the competent fact witness. You can just hear it through hearsay, but they can't
[56:34.140 --> 56:40.340]  commence with a prosecution without a competent fact witness affidavit. I mean, I'm not saying
[56:40.340 --> 56:47.140]  it's a bad thing to do. I just happen to have noticed that it's been two times now that
[56:47.140 --> 56:54.180]  Randy has attempted to intervene on someone else's behalf and he's gotten himself in trouble.
[56:54.180 --> 57:00.180]  Now, other people have done the same thing and not gotten into trouble, but the point
[57:00.180 --> 57:02.860]  is to try to get people to help themselves.
[57:02.860 --> 57:08.260]  Well, that's kind of why I'm calling. One of the topics I'm breaking down coincidentally
[57:08.260 --> 57:16.260]  is business and the definition of business in regards to state agencies. I'm working
[57:16.260 --> 57:21.020]  on, Eddie, this is kind of your area of expertise. I'm working on, it's basically the right
[57:21.020 --> 57:26.660]  to travel argument, but more of the right to property with the state agency. I wanted
[57:26.660 --> 57:34.500]  to call on your expertise to see if you could conclude the same thing as when I'm breaking
[57:34.500 --> 57:39.580]  down these state agencies. It comes down to these definitions that aren't defined anywhere,
[57:39.580 --> 57:49.420]  and then in the end of it, I'm ending up standing on my right, and that's basically the argument
[57:49.420 --> 57:56.740]  before the court. But as far as the state agency goes, they're forced to, hmm, is it?
[57:56.740 --> 58:02.660]  Well, you have to remember that one term under one agency can be defined completely differently
[58:02.660 --> 58:08.660]  in the code relating to another agency. For instance, even in the transportation code
[58:08.660 --> 58:16.620]  here in Texas, the word motor vehicle and vehicle will swap definitions in some places
[58:16.620 --> 58:22.260]  or they'll be completely different in other chapters, and so it's not consistent throughout
[58:22.260 --> 58:27.180]  the code. It's all relative to whatever you're currently reading as to what the definition
[58:27.180 --> 58:32.020]  may be, and you're going to find that to be a problem you're dealing with in the statutes
[58:32.020 --> 58:37.180]  between various agencies. You're taking on a very time-consuming task. I'll tell you
[58:37.180 --> 58:44.740]  that right now. I know I spent 17 years doing it. Okay, if you'll hang on just a second,
[58:44.740 --> 58:49.100]  Brian will pick you up on the other side of the break. Most of this is rule of law radio,
[58:49.100 --> 58:55.820]  512-646-1984 is the call-in number. If you have a question query or a pondering thing
[58:55.820 --> 59:00.220]  to bring to us, we'll see you on the other side of the break.
[59:00.220 --> 59:05.660]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[59:05.660 --> 59:10.860]  because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying
[59:10.860 --> 59:17.340]  the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. Enter
[59:17.340 --> 59:23.540]  the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the
[59:23.540 --> 59:29.900]  real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages
[59:29.900 --> 59:35.340]  are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond
[59:35.340 --> 59:40.460]  which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a free
[59:40.460 --> 59:46.500]  recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours
[59:46.500 --> 59:57.500]  just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:57.500 --> 01:00:10.380]  More than 20,000 public sector workers demonstrated in Athens Wednesday in a strike against deeper
[01:00:10.380 --> 01:00:16.900]  austerity cuts that shut down courts, schools, and transport. Police used tear gas and wielded
[01:00:16.900 --> 01:00:22.460]  batons to clear some protesters they deemed too rowdy. The protest came ahead of a general
[01:00:22.460 --> 01:00:28.640]  strike on October 19th against austerity measures that have driven one in four Greek households
[01:00:28.640 --> 01:00:33.100]  into poverty. Lights in and out of Egypt's main international
[01:00:33.100 --> 01:00:38.980]  airport were severely disrupted Thursday because of a work slowdown by Cairo air traffic
[01:00:38.980 --> 01:00:44.540]  controllers to protest the revocation of a promised bonus. The work slow reduced flight
[01:00:44.540 --> 01:00:50.700]  traffic by 80%. There have been a wave of strikes across Egypt since the January uprising
[01:00:50.700 --> 01:00:56.460]  which ousted President Hosni Mubarak. Striking workers have demanded better pay or the replacement
[01:00:56.460 --> 01:01:02.020]  of company or union heads who received their post in the Mubarak era.
[01:01:02.020 --> 01:01:07.780]  Egypt's ruling military generals unveiled plans Thursday that could see them retain
[01:01:07.780 --> 01:01:14.540]  power for another 18 months. The Supreme Council of the Armed Forces took control of Egypt
[01:01:14.540 --> 01:01:19.720]  after the toppling of President Hosni Mubarak in February and initially promised to turn
[01:01:19.720 --> 01:01:25.300]  over power within six months. During its time in power, the military has reintroduced Mubarak
[01:01:25.300 --> 01:01:31.420]  era emergency laws, tried civilians in military courts, and launched stringent crackdowns
[01:01:31.420 --> 01:01:38.020]  on public protests and freedom of speech. Tens of thousands of demonstrators marched
[01:01:38.020 --> 01:01:43.220]  through Lower Manhattan Wednesday in the biggest show of support the Occupy Wall Street movement
[01:01:43.220 --> 01:01:48.460]  has received since it began in September. Protesters who have hunkered down in Zuccotti
[01:01:48.460 --> 01:01:53.420]  Park in New York's financial districts since September 17th were joined by students and
[01:01:53.420 --> 01:01:59.420]  members of the city's largest unions. Thousands of students at New York University, City University
[01:01:59.420 --> 01:02:04.860]  of New York, and the new school walked out of class joining tens of thousands of unionists
[01:02:04.860 --> 01:02:10.080]  and their supporters who had assembled at Foley Square. The mass chanting quote, we
[01:02:10.080 --> 01:02:16.380]  are the 99% marched down Broadway elbow to elbow. Things got violent later in the evening
[01:02:16.380 --> 01:02:22.860]  as demonstrators squared off against police guarding the New York Stock Exchange.
[01:02:22.860 --> 01:02:27.940]  Afghans marched through Kabul Thursday, marking the 10-year anniversary of the U.S. military
[01:02:27.940 --> 01:02:34.580]  campaign in Afghanistan. Demonstrators condemned the U.S. as occupiers and demanded the immediate
[01:02:34.580 --> 01:02:40.460]  withdrawal of all foreign troops. Marchers carried placards accusing the U.S. of quote,
[01:02:40.460 --> 01:02:47.220]  mass-occurring civilians, and denounced President Hamid Karzai as a puppet subservient to Washington.
[01:02:47.220 --> 01:02:53.420]  Protest organizer Hafizullah Rasky said quote, 10 years since the invasion, all we have seen
[01:02:53.420 --> 01:02:56.620]  is suffering and stability and poverty in our country.
[01:02:56.620 --> 01:03:14.860]  You are listening to the Rural Law Radio Network at RuralLawRadio.com. Live free speech talk
[01:03:14.860 --> 01:03:43.580]  radio at its best.
[01:03:43.580 --> 01:03:54.020]  All in numbers, 512-646-1984. We have about an hour left in the show. If you have any
[01:03:54.020 --> 01:03:58.060]  issues or questions, please give us a call. Right now we're going to go ahead and finish
[01:03:58.060 --> 01:04:02.820]  up with Brian in Minnesota. All right, Brian, let's finish you up here.
[01:04:02.820 --> 01:04:08.020]  Well, hopefully you got a little bit of time. We've got a couple questions, and they're
[01:04:08.020 --> 01:04:13.500]  kind of important. But with the back to the agency thing for just a moment, and what it's
[01:04:13.500 --> 01:04:20.460]  seems to me from my perspective is that is all these state agencies don't want to recognize
[01:04:20.460 --> 01:04:27.180]  our right to conduct ourselves in a private manner. Well, that's true. That's exactly
[01:04:27.180 --> 01:04:33.500]  what Harman and I both talked about on the show in relation to these things being commercial.
[01:04:33.500 --> 01:04:37.900]  But there's another aspect of this argument between the state agencies you may not be
[01:04:37.900 --> 01:04:46.020]  aware of or have looked at. And that is exactly what is a state administrative agency. If
[01:04:46.020 --> 01:04:51.140]  they are actually state administrative agencies, then you need to be looking at your state
[01:04:51.140 --> 01:04:57.540]  administrative procedures act. And I guarantee you there is one. And in that state administrative
[01:04:57.540 --> 01:05:03.300]  procedures act, you're going to find out some very interesting things. If the agency you're
[01:05:03.300 --> 01:05:12.220]  dealing with is actually defined in the law as a state agency, then the courts in Texas
[01:05:12.220 --> 01:05:17.780]  anyway, but they will probably be the same in your state, the courts absolutely lack
[01:05:17.780 --> 01:05:23.660]  jurisdiction to hear an administrative proceeding, which mean when they write you a citation
[01:05:23.660 --> 01:05:30.420]  and take you to traffic court, they've already screwed up because traffic court in Texas
[01:05:30.420 --> 01:05:36.780]  is a judicial proceedings. And the administrative act says that doesn't fly.
[01:05:36.780 --> 01:05:42.020]  Well, as far as I know, I mean, we have something governing the agencies and the rulemaking
[01:05:42.020 --> 01:05:46.780]  power, but the administrative procedures act is repealed, I believe. And so I'm left
[01:05:46.780 --> 01:05:53.100]  with just that one section. And I've been talked, would you, I'm looking into these
[01:05:53.100 --> 01:06:01.100]  old cases like Wicked versus Fillburn, Shuttleworth versus Birmingham, Hale versus Hinkle, Murdoch
[01:06:01.100 --> 01:06:04.420]  versus Pennsylvania. Are those good law that they use? I mean, are these?
[01:06:04.420 --> 01:06:07.780]  Yeah, they're good law. They have a health, especially Hale versus Hinkle. That's never
[01:06:07.780 --> 01:06:16.220]  been overturned. Neither has Shuttleworth. They're all still good law as far as I know.
[01:06:16.220 --> 01:06:19.980]  They're the same opinions we use in some of the traffic citations.
[01:06:19.980 --> 01:06:25.860]  Are you familiar with Wicked versus Fillburn? I think so.
[01:06:25.860 --> 01:06:32.900]  Does the government regulate that which it subsidizes?
[01:06:32.900 --> 01:06:37.580]  I might have that case, but please feel free to email it to me just in case I don't. The
[01:06:37.580 --> 01:06:41.980]  subject sounds familiar, but it's been a long time since I've read it.
[01:06:41.980 --> 01:06:46.540]  People are using it on tax issues, but as far as I'm concerned, it applies here, too.
[01:06:46.540 --> 01:06:50.460]  I mean, if they're not regulating it, then that kind of says it right there.
[01:06:50.460 --> 01:06:55.380]  Right. Well, the point here is, though, is that these agencies think that you're engaging
[01:06:55.380 --> 01:07:00.780]  in something they are allowed to regulate and you're not. For instance, in Texas, they
[01:07:00.780 --> 01:07:08.140]  think you're engaging in transportation and you're not. So they use the authority granted
[01:07:08.140 --> 01:07:16.260]  under transportation to try to compel you to participate and then make it look like
[01:07:16.260 --> 01:07:21.700]  your participation was voluntary from the get-go when, in fact, you've been compelled
[01:07:21.700 --> 01:07:29.180]  and coerced by threat of duress for not having the accoutrements they say you must have, even
[01:07:29.180 --> 01:07:34.180]  though you're not actively participating in the activity itself.
[01:07:34.180 --> 01:07:36.820]  We could consider that P&H more or less, right?
[01:07:36.820 --> 01:07:43.540]  Yeah, that's exactly what we can do. But again, you would have to make the argument that you
[01:07:43.540 --> 01:07:51.580]  never consented. And unfortunately, that argument doesn't work for 99.9 percent of the people
[01:07:51.580 --> 01:07:56.740]  because the first thing they do when they're called on it by the traffic cop is give them
[01:07:56.740 --> 01:08:04.300]  a dad-gum license and everything else he asks for. And the moment you do that, you're admitting
[01:08:04.300 --> 01:08:13.140]  that you're doing something that those things are required and apply to. That's a mistake.
[01:08:13.140 --> 01:08:18.580]  You're giving them evidence to use against you at a court of law in direct violation
[01:08:18.580 --> 01:08:24.620]  of your protections of protected rights, in this case, right of self-incrimination, right
[01:08:24.620 --> 01:08:30.260]  of producing evidence or information against yourself.
[01:08:30.260 --> 01:08:34.540]  Is right of free trade, is that because they use right of association, is right of free
[01:08:34.540 --> 01:08:39.660]  trade a dangerous term to use then it's like so thrown around in commerce is like free
[01:08:39.660 --> 01:08:44.860]  free trade. Okay, again, the whole objective here is to separate yourself from commercial
[01:08:44.860 --> 01:08:53.180]  law, but not dig yourself in deeper by insisting it applies to you for any reason, right, right.
[01:08:53.180 --> 01:08:59.780]  Okay, so as far as using the argument, how would that particular terminology help you
[01:08:59.780 --> 01:09:07.460]  prove you're not engaging in the act you're arguing? If it's not helping you, I guarantee
[01:09:07.460 --> 01:09:15.420]  you it's hurting you. Right. Oh, and in regards to this just I just had this on my list and
[01:09:15.420 --> 01:09:20.980]  it popped into my head. I need to file a criminal complaint in this court case. And regardless
[01:09:20.980 --> 01:09:24.220]  of what happened to Randy, I'm going to file it anyways because I've witnessed an assault
[01:09:24.220 --> 01:09:28.380]  and it's like, I'm not going to not file that. I've witnessed an assault. I have a right
[01:09:28.380 --> 01:09:33.820]  to, I have a duty to file a complaint. Of course. Yes. I never, I never, I never said
[01:09:33.820 --> 01:09:38.020]  only if they were wearing a gun. I never said not to file any criminal complaints, especially
[01:09:38.020 --> 01:09:42.860]  bureau competent fact witness. No, and I'm not saying that either. I'm just saying, you
[01:09:42.860 --> 01:09:47.580]  know, it can, it sounds intimidating when they do something like this to, to, you know,
[01:09:47.580 --> 01:09:57.580]  yeah, that's exactly the intended point. Right. In fact, at the trial, the judge even told
[01:09:57.580 --> 01:10:05.820]  the jury that citizens don't have a duty to report crime. Well, actually how that came
[01:10:05.820 --> 01:10:11.340]  about based upon the testimony information I received is, is that the state's witness
[01:10:11.340 --> 01:10:20.220]  made the statement on the witness stand that no law requires a citizen to report a crime.
[01:10:20.220 --> 01:10:27.500]  And the judge immediately piped up and said, no, they don't and no, or no, there isn't.
[01:10:27.500 --> 01:10:31.460]  And a defense attorney was actually sitting in the court gallery. He immediately raised
[01:10:31.460 --> 01:10:40.180]  his head up, but barely spoke audibly and said, yes, they do. There is a requirement.
[01:10:40.180 --> 01:10:48.660]  And that is the federal misprisons of felony. There are several here in Texas, 38.05 penal
[01:10:48.660 --> 01:10:55.580]  code hindering apprehension or prosecution, the code of criminal procedure 14.01, where
[01:10:55.580 --> 01:11:04.180]  it says any individual may arrest any person that commits a felony or breach of the peace
[01:11:04.180 --> 01:11:10.660]  in their view or presence. And one of the things I put in Randy's new trial brief is,
[01:11:10.660 --> 01:11:17.460]  if you make such an arrest, then the duty to immediately report the reason for the arrest
[01:11:17.460 --> 01:11:24.980]  and to turn the arrested individual over to some law enforcement authority kicks in.
[01:11:24.980 --> 01:11:32.140]  You can't get there without there being a duty to do it.
[01:11:32.140 --> 01:11:39.820]  So the stuff these people were saying in open court, this could not be more seditious if
[01:11:39.820 --> 01:11:46.700]  they stood out front and burned the Constitution and said, we're not going to follow this anymore.
[01:11:46.700 --> 01:11:52.620]  Are you familiar with that section US code 2381 statement people always use that says,
[01:11:52.620 --> 01:11:59.260]  in the presence of two other witnesses, if the judge fails to move to protect the Constitution
[01:11:59.260 --> 01:12:02.060]  is guilty of treason. Everyone's stating it.
[01:12:02.060 --> 01:12:13.060]  Yeah, but the problem is, is where does that statute apply? Federal courts in federal territories,
[01:12:13.060 --> 01:12:22.500]  which none of the states are. I see. Hmm. All right. Well, I got two other questions
[01:12:22.500 --> 01:12:27.380]  quick. And I'll take your answer. We see on the board. So don't drop off. We
[01:12:27.380 --> 01:12:31.420]  know you're out there. Let us get Brian wrapped up here. All right. And these are regarding
[01:12:31.420 --> 01:12:35.860]  things you we've kind of gone over in the past. One is the motion and limiting you talked
[01:12:35.860 --> 01:12:42.020]  about several weeks ago, maybe a month ago. And I was, I kind of plagiarized that and
[01:12:42.020 --> 01:12:47.260]  took some of that. You and Randy were talking about it's just so good. So I got to use it
[01:12:47.260 --> 01:12:52.740]  and you and Randy were talking about one of the purposes that is not to have the complaint
[01:12:52.740 --> 01:12:57.820]  written. You would ask that the complaint not be read into the record. That's correct.
[01:12:57.820 --> 01:13:01.620]  Because a line and read it into the record allows them to introduce the very terms you're
[01:13:01.620 --> 01:13:07.620]  objecting to. Now, are you talking rate off the bat? Like, are you talking to the jury?
[01:13:07.620 --> 01:13:13.820]  That's the first thing they will do before any arguments begin is ask the defense. Do
[01:13:13.820 --> 01:13:21.460]  you wish to complain read into the record? If they do it at all? If they even have a
[01:13:21.460 --> 01:13:26.700]  complaint. Yeah, that's the other thing. Normally they do not have a valid complaint
[01:13:26.700 --> 01:13:31.820]  on its face. The one could object to them breeding it into the record anyway. Yes, but
[01:13:31.820 --> 01:13:36.940]  you can object to the complaint as being facially invalid because it asserts facts that there's
[01:13:36.940 --> 01:13:44.300]  no evidence of such as that you were operating a motor vehicle on a highway in this state.
[01:13:44.300 --> 01:13:47.860]  Are you talking? There's no evidence of that. Are you talking
[01:13:47.860 --> 01:13:54.380]  that arraignment or is this later even during like the jury's wardrobe? This is at trial.
[01:13:54.380 --> 01:13:58.900]  At trial is when they will ask if you want the complaint read into the record. Okay.
[01:13:58.900 --> 01:14:02.060]  I didn't think it was appropriate to file the motion and limiting it yet when we still
[01:14:02.060 --> 01:14:09.100]  challenging jurisdictions. I was holding off on that. My other question was we talked
[01:14:09.100 --> 01:14:14.220]  before about not testifying and how important it is to not testify. Hopefully, someone else
[01:14:14.220 --> 01:14:23.700]  will listen to this or whatever. My question for you, Eddie and Deborah, when should a
[01:14:23.700 --> 01:14:30.060]  person testify? What's the right way to do that? I've definitely seen it work against
[01:14:30.060 --> 01:14:34.660]  people more than I have worked. Right. And that's the whole deal is there's
[01:14:34.660 --> 01:14:40.820]  no easy way to answer your question and that's because every person is different. You put
[01:14:40.820 --> 01:14:46.380]  me on a witness stand, somebody and it ain't going to be me is in trouble if the subject
[01:14:46.380 --> 01:14:52.660]  is due process or traffic. That prosecutor is going to put his hands up in the air and
[01:14:52.660 --> 01:14:58.780]  run screaming for the courtroom. I promise you. But take somebody that doesn't have a
[01:14:58.780 --> 01:15:06.340]  clue. The worst thing they can do is take the stand and open their mouth. Okay. If you're
[01:15:06.340 --> 01:15:10.500]  going to do that, just take your wallet out and throw it toward the prosecutor before
[01:15:10.500 --> 01:15:17.700]  you ever sit down because you're going to hurt yourself far more than not. Even if you
[01:15:17.700 --> 01:15:24.540]  have an attorney helping defend you, he is still going to use the same terminology that
[01:15:24.540 --> 01:15:34.340]  is going to convict you. So it is a no win situation when you do not have competent counsel
[01:15:34.340 --> 01:15:40.500]  and you are not competent to the words and phrases being used against you and the laws
[01:15:40.500 --> 01:15:51.780]  that are going on around them. All right. So my advice is never testify unless you know
[01:15:51.780 --> 01:15:58.420]  exactly what you're testifying to and exactly what your arguments are and you can fend off
[01:15:58.420 --> 01:16:08.500]  any type of beat down on those arguments. When you can recite it by name in your sleep
[01:16:08.500 --> 01:16:14.820]  and know every counter argument to it cold, then feel free to open your mouth and fly.
[01:16:14.820 --> 01:16:21.820]  Feel then sit down, shut up and don't take the stand. It's all about knowing what they're
[01:16:21.820 --> 01:16:25.740]  going to question you about more or less, right? Knowing that you're going to have to
[01:16:25.740 --> 01:16:32.540]  answer in a certain way. Well, you also have to be familiar with the whole commercial nature
[01:16:32.540 --> 01:16:37.940]  of thing. In other words, going to the school of harm and tailor because otherwise you will
[01:16:37.940 --> 01:16:44.180]  rush headlong off a cliff into a commercial agreement with these guys and not know it.
[01:16:44.180 --> 01:16:48.380]  That's another reason not to take the stand. Yeah. And Brian, if that's all you got, we
[01:16:48.380 --> 01:16:54.900]  really need to move on. Yeah, thank you for your time. All right. Thank you. I folks will
[01:16:54.900 --> 01:17:08.580]  be right back 512-646-1984. It's the story of a lost city, lost opportunity, lost hope,
[01:17:08.580 --> 01:17:15.580]  a story of failed policies, failed leadership, a story of smooth talking politicians, games
[01:17:15.580 --> 01:17:26.580]  of he said, she said, rhetoric and division. One man has stood apart, stood strong and true,
[01:17:26.580 --> 01:17:35.580]  voting against every tax increase, every unbalanced budget, every time, standing up to the Washington
[01:17:35.580 --> 01:17:43.580]  Post, guided by principle. Ron Paul, the one who will stop the spending, save the dollar,
[01:17:43.580 --> 01:17:53.580]  free jobs, bring peace, the one who will restore liberty. Ron Paul, the one who can beat Obama
[01:17:53.580 --> 01:18:01.420]  and restore America now. I'm Ron Paul and I approve this message. It is so enlightening
[01:18:01.420 --> 01:18:06.700]  to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy and neither is
[01:18:06.700 --> 01:18:10.900]  finding like-minded people to share it with. Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave
[01:18:10.900 --> 01:18:16.140]  New Books then. Brave New Books? Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're
[01:18:16.140 --> 01:18:21.060]  looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul and G. Edward Griffin. They even stock
[01:18:21.060 --> 01:18:26.820]  inner food, Burkey products and Calvin Soap. There's no way a place like that exists. Go
[01:18:26.820 --> 01:18:32.180]  check it out for yourself. It's downtown in 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:18:32.180 --> 01:18:37.500]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there. Actually, they now offer a free
[01:18:37.500 --> 01:18:43.420]  hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[01:18:43.420 --> 01:18:50.820]  It does exist, but when are they open? Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM and 1 to 6
[01:18:50.820 --> 01:18:56.780]  PM on Sundays. So give them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page.
[01:18:56.780 --> 01:18:58.780]  www.bravenewbookstore.com
[01:19:27.780 --> 01:19:34.780]  Hi, folks. We are back. This is rule of law radio. All our numbers are 512-246-1984.
[01:19:34.780 --> 01:19:39.500]  We've got about three more segments left in the show. We are taking your calls. Right
[01:19:39.500 --> 01:19:44.860]  now we have Wendy in California and then we will get to Julian after this. Evening, Wendy,
[01:19:44.860 --> 01:19:52.940]  what can we do for you? Hi. I wanted to report that I went through a period of being targeted
[01:19:52.940 --> 01:20:04.260]  and I got several tickets. So one by one I've been going to court and I won my very first
[01:20:04.260 --> 01:20:10.900]  trial. I wanted to thank you guys. It does work. I've been listening for a while and
[01:20:10.900 --> 01:20:17.860]  I was just amazed. It's an awesome feeling. Also, and then my second trial, I was going
[01:20:17.860 --> 01:20:24.260]  to go to trial, but they gave me a really good offer. So I accepted it. Then my third
[01:20:24.260 --> 01:20:31.980]  case, unfortunately I messed up a little bit and missed my court date. However, I did some
[01:20:31.980 --> 01:20:38.140]  research and I found out I could try to get a new court date. So I went through the judge
[01:20:38.140 --> 01:20:45.860]  and he was really very difficult and hostile, but I stood my ground and I got a new court
[01:20:45.860 --> 01:20:56.540]  date. I have a question here. Now, this particular one that's coming up is in Nevada and I noticed
[01:20:56.540 --> 01:21:02.540]  that the prosecutor is the city attorney and I thought that you mentioned that they're
[01:21:02.540 --> 01:21:09.140]  not allowed to use the city attorney. In Texas, they're not. What? In Texas, they're
[01:21:09.140 --> 01:21:16.740]  not. Okay. Okay. In Texas, a city attorney is not authorized by the Texas Constitution
[01:21:16.740 --> 01:21:22.460]  in any way, shape, or form to act as an attorney for the state. Therefore, the legislature
[01:21:22.460 --> 01:21:29.300]  cannot give him the power to act as an attorney for the state because the Constitution specifically
[01:21:29.300 --> 01:21:38.660]  vests that power in two public offices only, county and district attorney. Okay. Now, how
[01:21:38.660 --> 01:21:43.460]  would I, what research should I do to find out whether to change? Start with your Constitution
[01:21:43.460 --> 01:21:48.380]  and see what it says under the judicial branch of government because that would usually be
[01:21:48.380 --> 01:22:00.180]  where those offices are defined and the powers they carry. Okay. That would be the first place.
[01:22:00.180 --> 01:22:04.660]  Then you read the statute to see if they comport themselves in compliance with the constitutional
[01:22:04.660 --> 01:22:11.540]  mandates. When they don't, then you make a challenge to them on those grounds. Now, remember,
[01:22:11.540 --> 01:22:20.860]  this is your state Constitution, not the federal Constitution. Okay. I noticed a lot of times
[01:22:20.860 --> 01:22:27.660]  in the DMV law, they say, they'll say things like, oh, it's okay to use the ticket as the
[01:22:27.660 --> 01:22:34.660]  state. Things like that. Where would I research whether those things are indeed legal? So,
[01:22:34.660 --> 01:22:42.380]  it seems like there's conflicting rules or laws. Well, that's true. The problem here
[01:22:42.380 --> 01:22:48.700]  is just like in our own code, there appear to be areas that conflict. So, there's two
[01:22:48.700 --> 01:22:56.620]  ways that statutory construction operates. One is a general statute versus a local specific
[01:22:56.620 --> 01:23:05.100]  statute. Unless the statute, the general statute specifically says it controls over any other
[01:23:05.100 --> 01:23:12.460]  section of law, then the local specific provision will always control the actual meaning you're
[01:23:12.460 --> 01:23:14.620]  looking at. Okay.
[01:23:14.620 --> 01:23:18.100]  So, that again has to be understood.
[01:23:18.100 --> 01:23:23.780]  Okay. Let's say, for instance, that in the Code of Criminal Procedure here in Texas, when
[01:23:23.780 --> 01:23:30.580]  it says that a police officer that arrests someone accused of a crime must take them
[01:23:30.580 --> 01:23:38.780]  before a magistrate as soon as possible, but without unnecessary delay, the courts and
[01:23:38.780 --> 01:23:45.780]  the officers are assuming they automatically have 48 hours to do so. However, then you
[01:23:45.780 --> 01:23:55.380]  go to 543.002 of the transportation code and it says that those that are arrested for transportation
[01:23:55.380 --> 01:24:02.100]  offenses are to be taken immediately before a magistrate and there is nothing discussing
[01:24:02.100 --> 01:24:08.380]  a delay. One is a general provision, the one in the Code of Criminal Procedure dealing
[01:24:08.380 --> 01:24:15.820]  with within 48 hours and without unnecessary delay. The transportation code provision is
[01:24:15.820 --> 01:24:25.500]  local and specific to such arrests made for transportation offenses. Therefore, it controls
[01:24:25.500 --> 01:24:32.220]  not the one in the Code of Criminal Procedure. They must take you immediately before a magistrate.
[01:24:32.220 --> 01:24:39.380]  They are not allowed to do it within 48 hours or without unnecessary delay. They are required
[01:24:39.380 --> 01:24:45.220]  to immediately take you for a transportation offense. Does it make sense now?
[01:24:45.220 --> 01:24:51.340]  So, it's whatever is in the local code that is the precedent.
[01:24:51.340 --> 01:24:59.220]  The local section of a code versus a general section of code always takes precedent unless
[01:24:59.220 --> 01:25:05.220]  the general code or the local code says that the general code has precedent.
[01:25:05.220 --> 01:25:06.220]  Okay.
[01:25:06.220 --> 01:25:07.220]  Okay.
[01:25:07.220 --> 01:25:08.220]  All right.
[01:25:08.220 --> 01:25:09.220]  Yes.
[01:25:09.220 --> 01:25:15.220]  All right. Any other aspect of that you're not getting?
[01:25:15.220 --> 01:25:18.220]  I think I understand it. Thank you.
[01:25:18.220 --> 01:25:23.220]  Okay. Okay. Did you have any other questions for us on it?
[01:25:23.220 --> 01:25:31.220]  Well, yes. In my research, I found some possible tactics to use and I just wanted to run by
[01:25:31.220 --> 01:25:36.220]  you real quick. These are to get it different to dismiss it because they don't want you
[01:25:36.220 --> 01:25:41.220]  to cause trouble in the courtroom. One is a request, or make three motions. One is a
[01:25:41.220 --> 01:25:48.220]  request for a verified complaint, a demure to the notice to appear, and then finally,
[01:25:48.220 --> 01:25:55.220]  a summary request. No. The first thing you always want to file is a motion to challenge
[01:25:55.220 --> 01:26:02.220]  of jurisdiction, a motion to quash complaint. They can't get you into trial without those
[01:26:02.220 --> 01:26:09.220]  things anyway, and then you'll worry about the rest of it.
[01:26:09.220 --> 01:26:10.220]  Okay.
[01:26:10.220 --> 01:26:17.220]  Okay. Now, another motion that you always want to file is a motion for nature and cause.
[01:26:17.220 --> 01:26:23.220]  Every state requires that the defendant has the right to be advised as to the nature and
[01:26:23.220 --> 01:26:32.220]  cause against them, and they never do that. They never state in a complaint, this is a
[01:26:32.220 --> 01:26:38.220]  criminal complaint or a criminal accusation for the purposes of. They never state that,
[01:26:38.220 --> 01:26:46.220]  and criminal is the nature in most states. In California, it's civil is the nature or
[01:26:46.220 --> 01:26:53.220]  administrative is the nature. That would tell you what law you're supposed to be using,
[01:26:53.220 --> 01:26:58.220]  and exactly what the classification of that particular law is, even when it doesn't say
[01:26:58.220 --> 01:27:08.220]  so. But you have the right to know the nature and cause, and the cause actually is the
[01:27:08.220 --> 01:27:15.220]  specific law and the specific things you did to violate that law. That's the cause.
[01:27:15.220 --> 01:27:20.220]  And how is that different from the ticket?
[01:27:20.220 --> 01:27:34.220]  Because the ticket is not sworn under oath, and it's not verified by anybody.
[01:27:34.220 --> 01:27:42.220]  Okay. So what usually happens then if I file these three that you just mentioned?
[01:27:42.220 --> 01:27:48.220]  Well, you're asking me to gaze into a crystal ball that's been unplugged.
[01:27:48.220 --> 01:27:54.220]  I can't tell you what usually happens because it varies, and we do not get feedback on every
[01:27:54.220 --> 01:28:00.220]  case, so I have no way of statistically telling you what will happen. And again, what should
[01:28:00.220 --> 01:28:07.220]  happen depends entirely on what the nature is. Criminal will occur differently than civil.
[01:28:07.220 --> 01:28:13.220]  Civil or criminal will occur differently than administrative. They're all different, and
[01:28:13.220 --> 01:28:19.220]  until you know the nature, you don't know which one to expect to have to respond under.
[01:28:19.220 --> 01:28:30.220]  Oh, okay. It seems like there's a big pressure so much to settle it without going through
[01:28:30.220 --> 01:28:31.220]  a trial.
[01:28:31.220 --> 01:28:36.220]  Right, because they want to keep the illusion that they're right and you're wrong and you
[01:28:36.220 --> 01:28:41.220]  have to do this alive and well. It's how they steal money.
[01:28:41.220 --> 01:28:48.220]  If you think they don't know they're a bunch of crooks, think again. They absolutely do.
[01:28:48.220 --> 01:28:56.220]  What their job is is to ensure that the public doesn't know it or get to bring it forth for
[01:28:56.220 --> 01:29:01.220]  everybody else to learn. That's why they run these railroad jobs on people that have actually
[01:29:01.220 --> 01:29:07.220]  read the law. They act like the person is making meritless arguments, when in fact they're
[01:29:07.220 --> 01:29:14.220]  absolutely correct, but the court is running rust shot over them to keep the illusion alive
[01:29:14.220 --> 01:29:21.220]  and the money flowing.
[01:29:21.220 --> 01:29:25.220]  And the illusion is what exactly?
[01:29:25.220 --> 01:29:30.220]  That you are required to have a license, that you are required to register your car, that
[01:29:30.220 --> 01:29:37.220]  you are required to inspect it, and so on and so forth.
[01:29:37.220 --> 01:29:38.220]  Okay.
[01:29:38.220 --> 01:29:39.220]  Okay.
[01:29:39.220 --> 01:29:41.220]  Yeah, thank you very much.
[01:29:41.220 --> 01:29:46.220]  You're very welcome, Wendy. All right, Julian, David, we see you there on the board. Y'all
[01:29:46.220 --> 01:29:50.220]  hang on. We'll be back after the break, Chad. See you there, too. We'll be right back on
[01:29:50.220 --> 01:29:56.220]  the other side. This is Rule of Law Radio 512-646-1984. We've got about a half an hour left, so give
[01:29:56.220 --> 01:30:03.220]  us your calls. We'll be right back.
[01:30:26.220 --> 01:30:33.220]  For more information, please go to okcbombingtruth.com.
[01:30:56.220 --> 01:31:02.220]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:31:02.220 --> 01:31:07.220]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:31:07.220 --> 01:31:15.220]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:31:15.220 --> 01:31:21.220]  Google gets you tons of information fast, right? Well, not so fast, maybe. It also erodes
[01:31:21.220 --> 01:31:26.220]  students' ability to dig for information and analyze it. A two-year study at Five American
[01:31:26.220 --> 01:31:31.220]  University showed students who don't know their librarians were much more likely to seek
[01:31:31.220 --> 01:31:36.220]  information in journals and databases that were not suited to their studies. These students
[01:31:36.220 --> 01:31:42.220]  were also nearly clueless about how databases actually work. Adopting Google-style interfaces
[01:31:42.220 --> 01:31:47.220]  and college databases isn't the answer, though. What students need is to learn the basics,
[01:31:47.220 --> 01:31:53.220]  how to retrieve, organize, and prioritize data. In other words, not to let Google do their
[01:31:53.220 --> 01:32:18.220]  thinking for them.
[01:32:18.220 --> 01:32:39.220]  Hi, I just want to say to that last caller, I beat three tickets or got them dismissed
[01:32:39.220 --> 01:32:49.220]  just by asking in court what the nature and the cause was. I got all these answers that
[01:32:49.220 --> 01:32:54.220]  just don't make sense. When I asked what the nature of the tickets were and the nature
[01:32:54.220 --> 01:33:00.220]  of the charges were, he said they're traffic tickets and he squinted his face like I wasn't
[01:33:00.220 --> 01:33:14.220]  supposed to know what the word nature means. Have you seen the show's speeders?
[01:33:14.220 --> 01:33:18.220]  Yes.
[01:33:18.220 --> 01:33:24.220]  What do you think about this show? I'm just appalled by it because it was the first time
[01:33:24.220 --> 01:33:33.220]  I saw it. You got a camera crew following around a police officer who's going to pull
[01:33:33.220 --> 01:33:44.220]  somebody over. In every case now, I don't see him actually finding any probable cause.
[01:33:44.220 --> 01:33:50.220]  Well, that's true. The thing about it is they're everywhere. But again, until we make them
[01:33:50.220 --> 01:33:55.220]  realize that we're not engaging in the activity they're accusing us of being in, then it's
[01:33:55.220 --> 01:33:58.220]  not going to change.
[01:33:58.220 --> 01:34:04.220]  I just watched the show and I'm imagining, yeah, what if they pulled somebody over who
[01:34:04.220 --> 01:34:09.220]  really put forth the time and effort to defend their freedom?
[01:34:09.220 --> 01:34:15.220]  Ding ding, we have a winner. That's exactly the idea. That's exactly what my purpose is,
[01:34:15.220 --> 01:34:22.220]  is to teach you to be that guy. Just like Bruce Willis said in that last Die Hard movie,
[01:34:22.220 --> 01:34:26.220]  you're here, you're there, things happen and nobody else will do it. That's what makes
[01:34:26.220 --> 01:34:29.220]  you that guy.
[01:34:29.220 --> 01:34:39.220]  Hey, but say that happened. Would I, hypothetically, be able to hold them liable for trying to
[01:34:39.220 --> 01:34:43.220]  make a show out of this arrest?
[01:34:43.220 --> 01:34:49.220]  Absolutely. If you can show that you were illegally arrested, let's make them run a
[01:34:49.220 --> 01:34:56.220]  retraction that shows the cop got sued later and lost his job for false imprisonment.
[01:34:56.220 --> 01:35:00.220]  You think they're going to air that show? I doubt it. Will they have enough money left
[01:35:00.220 --> 01:35:06.220]  to put on the show after you sue them? I doubt it, especially if we put enough of them
[01:35:06.220 --> 01:35:12.220]  out there suing the show for putting it on. It's a propaganda ploy.
[01:35:12.220 --> 01:35:17.220]  Yeah, I know. It's out there to make it look like what these cops are doing when they're
[01:35:17.220 --> 01:35:23.220]  running down speeders that are not actively engaging in commerce is something valid and
[01:35:23.220 --> 01:35:28.220]  lawful and it isn't.
[01:35:28.220 --> 01:35:33.220]  Now, don't get me wrong, folks. I'm not advocating you going out there driving a million miles
[01:35:33.220 --> 01:35:40.220]  an hour and not being able to control your car. Okay? My deal is that you are responsible
[01:35:40.220 --> 01:35:47.220]  and liable for your own actions. And if your actions cause a harm, then you do not get to
[01:35:47.220 --> 01:35:54.220]  hide behind something else to say you're not liable for it because you are.
[01:35:54.220 --> 01:36:01.220]  So my deal is liability for the individual. That's what makes you free to act accordingly,
[01:36:01.220 --> 01:36:08.220]  but know that anything you do to cause a harm, you're responsible for.
[01:36:08.220 --> 01:36:13.220]  That will definitely make you think twice about doing something that could harm another
[01:36:13.220 --> 01:36:18.220]  or their property without a very necessary reason for having to put that plan in action
[01:36:18.220 --> 01:36:26.220]  in the first place. That's what makes us self-regulating. We don't need government for that.
[01:36:26.220 --> 01:36:30.220]  We can do it.
[01:36:30.220 --> 01:36:33.220]  So that's my take on it, Julian. Does that help?
[01:36:33.220 --> 01:36:40.220]  Well, yeah. But to tie into that, just recently the ATF comes out and says,
[01:36:40.220 --> 01:36:43.220]  medicinal marijuana patients can own guns.
[01:36:43.220 --> 01:36:50.220]  Well, and what is required to tell the ATF to take a fly and leap off a very tall cliff?
[01:36:50.220 --> 01:36:56.220]  Well, what's really the question is how is it that they can...
[01:36:56.220 --> 01:37:01.220]  Remember the bond decision, and I believe it was this year or last year.
[01:37:01.220 --> 01:37:09.220]  An individual has just as much right to argue 10th Amendment immunity as the state does.
[01:37:09.220 --> 01:37:16.220]  If the state law allows it, the federal law doesn't mean a thing. Got it?
[01:37:16.220 --> 01:37:20.220]  Okay, okay. So we are 14th Amendment...
[01:37:20.220 --> 01:37:24.220]  No, I don't even take us down that path. I'm not going to take that road.
[01:37:24.220 --> 01:37:26.220]  Well, then where are we?
[01:37:26.220 --> 01:37:33.220]  We're free people. We set up a government that limited the jurisdiction of the federal government.
[01:37:33.220 --> 01:37:38.220]  Their limited jurisdiction has nothing to do with the 14th Amendment.
[01:37:38.220 --> 01:37:39.220]  Okay?
[01:37:39.220 --> 01:37:40.220]  They're saying, but yeah.
[01:37:40.220 --> 01:37:45.220]  I know what they're saying. They say a lot of stuff. All of it wrong.
[01:37:45.220 --> 01:37:52.220]  There's supposed to be a legal argument with all this. With what they're saying, where is there...
[01:37:52.220 --> 01:37:59.220]  Well, the legal argument is, as Harmon points out correctly, if you actually study the issue on it is,
[01:37:59.220 --> 01:38:03.220]  there's no constitution to bind them at the federal level anymore.
[01:38:03.220 --> 01:38:07.220]  It's self-destructed. It was arranged that way.
[01:38:07.220 --> 01:38:17.220]  And if you want to understand that, simply go read the passage dealing with who is available or allowed to be president.
[01:38:17.220 --> 01:38:22.220]  You'll see right there very quickly that there are three distinct qualifications.
[01:38:22.220 --> 01:38:30.220]  And the last one, or the first two, are completely dependent on the third.
[01:38:30.220 --> 01:38:31.220]  Okay?
[01:38:31.220 --> 01:38:45.220]  And the problem there is, is that that third one specifically limits who can be president to those that were alive at the time the Constitution was adopted.
[01:38:45.220 --> 01:38:49.220]  You don't believe it? Go read it.
[01:38:49.220 --> 01:38:55.220]  Once that generation of people died off, there couldn't be a president.
[01:38:55.220 --> 01:39:07.220]  And the entire structure of government it set up can't function because Congress can't pass a law without a presidential signature.
[01:39:07.220 --> 01:39:13.220]  They can't overturn a veto unless there's a president to veto.
[01:39:13.220 --> 01:39:19.220]  Everything at that level is completely interconnected and interdependent.
[01:39:19.220 --> 01:39:27.220]  If you can't elect a valid president, none of the other things function.
[01:39:27.220 --> 01:39:33.220]  It's a Swiss watch missing a gear.
[01:39:33.220 --> 01:39:42.220]  And I know a lot of people out there hate to hear that, but I haven't gone on this long with you guys to start blowing smoke at you now.
[01:39:42.220 --> 01:39:52.220]  If you go read it, it tells you right there that it blew itself up as soon as that first generation of folks at the adoption died.
[01:39:52.220 --> 01:40:00.220]  And the real thing is, is that it was engineered to do that intentionally by the Committee on Style.
[01:40:00.220 --> 01:40:06.220]  When it went into that committee, those two commas that made all of that possible were not there.
[01:40:06.220 --> 01:40:17.220]  When it came out, they were there, and it was basically a short circuit clause built into the Constitution to derail it for what it is.
[01:40:17.220 --> 01:40:30.220]  I hate to say it. I hate to believe it, but if you can find an English teacher that can prove it wrong, introduce them to me.
[01:40:30.220 --> 01:40:32.220]  The president?
[01:40:32.220 --> 01:40:35.220]  We were not supposed to have a president after the first one?
[01:40:35.220 --> 01:40:39.220]  No. It isn't a matter of supposed to.
[01:40:39.220 --> 01:40:49.220]  It's a matter of that there was a short circuit engineered into the language of the Constitution that made it impossible to.
[01:40:49.220 --> 01:41:00.220]  I've heard a lot about Congress and them basically not supposed to be doing anything.
[01:41:00.220 --> 01:41:05.220]  Well, technically, if they were dissolved along with the Constitution, that would be true.
[01:41:05.220 --> 01:41:17.220]  But what is actually going on at the federal level is they are doing their darnedest to hide the fact that they're all acting without any lawful authority whatsoever.
[01:41:17.220 --> 01:41:20.220]  Yeah.
[01:41:20.220 --> 01:41:23.220]  And the states are supporting them in hiding that.
[01:41:23.220 --> 01:41:41.220]  And I can understand why. Imagine the anarchy that's going to ensue when all of these people that's been convicted of all of these statutes and all these other things that government has done under cover of constitutional power and they didn't have it.
[01:41:41.220 --> 01:41:44.220]  Revolution would ensue.
[01:41:44.220 --> 01:41:48.220]  If it didn't, I would be astounded.
[01:41:48.220 --> 01:41:53.220]  And that's what they're trying to prevent by hiding these facts.
[01:41:53.220 --> 01:42:05.220]  That's why you see the courts every time that something politically decisive and divisive comes up, they will always decided as if the Constitution doesn't exist.
[01:42:05.220 --> 01:42:17.220]  When they need to keep the people in under control and manageable, they will hand down a decision that makes it appear to be based on a constitutional requirement.
[01:42:17.220 --> 01:42:27.220]  It is smoke and mirrors.
[01:42:27.220 --> 01:42:30.220]  Yes, sir. All right. I'll let you go.
[01:42:30.220 --> 01:42:33.220]  All right. Well, thanks for calling in, Julian. Appreciate it a lot.
[01:42:33.220 --> 01:42:35.220]  All right. See you.
[01:42:35.220 --> 01:42:37.220]  All right. Bye-bye.
[01:42:37.220 --> 01:42:47.220]  All right. I know we're going to have somebody calling in agreeing with me or disagreeing with me, and that's fine. I don't have a problem with that. But folks, I'm asking you, go read it for yourself.
[01:42:47.220 --> 01:42:53.220]  Okay. Now, let's go to Chad in Texas. Chad, what can we do for you?
[01:42:53.220 --> 01:43:06.220]  Hey, Eddie. Yeah, I agree with what you said about the rights and a criminal prosecution in the state of Texas to demand the nature and cause of the accusation.
[01:43:06.220 --> 01:43:16.220]  But I think it's important, as you said earlier, to use the language of the Constitution when you're trying to enforce your constitutional right, or to a certain.
[01:43:16.220 --> 01:43:32.220]  Well, do that using the state Constitution. Out of all the states that probably have a valid Constitution at all, and that would in Texas only be the 1836, by the way, where one in Alabama would be the other.
[01:43:32.220 --> 01:43:40.220]  No other state, if you go back and check all of their records, got their own Constitution enacted in accordance with their own rules and procedures.
[01:43:40.220 --> 01:43:45.220]  But Chad, if you'll hang on, we'll pick you back up on the other side of the break, but just a minute.
[01:43:45.220 --> 01:43:59.220]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio 512-646-1984. We've got one segment left after this break, so if you've got an issue, now's the time to get in line. We'll be right back.
[01:43:59.220 --> 01:44:03.220]  Hey, did you hear? Ron Paul has announced he's running for president in 2012.
[01:44:03.220 --> 01:44:04.220]  Who's Ron Paul?
[01:44:04.220 --> 01:44:10.220]  Really? Okay, put down the cell phone for one minute. Your friends really don't care about your Twitter updates on what you had for breakfast.
[01:44:10.220 --> 01:44:13.220]  Oh, but I love to make those little smiley faces with punctuation marks.
[01:44:13.220 --> 01:44:20.220]  Of course you do. Now, listen closely. You need to go down to Brave New Books and learn as much as you can about Ron Paul and his message before it's too late.
[01:44:20.220 --> 01:44:28.220]  They have all of his books and many of the books he talks about. They also have t-shirts, bumper stickers, and yard signs so that you can show your support for him during the campaign.
[01:44:28.220 --> 01:44:31.220]  Brave New Books! Do they have Harry Potter and Twilight?
[01:44:31.220 --> 01:44:37.220]  No, but they do carry a large selection of survival and preparedness books to protect your family in time of emergency.
[01:44:37.220 --> 01:44:40.220]  Ugh, that sounds like that show in the Discovery Channel.
[01:44:40.220 --> 01:44:48.220]  Yeah, there's even a wilderness survival expert that teaches classes called Earthskills School that you can sign up for on the website bravenewbookstore.com. What are you doing?
[01:44:48.220 --> 01:44:54.220]  I'm tweeting all my friends that they should go to bravenewbookstore.com or down to the bookstore in person. Where's that located?
[01:44:54.220 --> 01:44:56.220]  1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:44:56.220 --> 01:44:58.220]  I even made a smiley face.
[01:44:58.220 --> 01:45:27.220]  Great.
[01:45:28.220 --> 01:45:33.220]  The Discovery was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.220 --> 01:45:42.220]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.220 --> 01:45:51.220]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.220 --> 01:46:00.220]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:00.220 --> 01:46:29.220]  Okay folks, we are back. This is our final segment. We're taking your calls. 512-646-1984. Chad, George, we see you.
[01:46:29.220 --> 01:46:42.220]  Folks, we had a question come in a little earlier about somebody who was offering to loan us some money to help Randy and we have to make the announcement we're not taking any loans at this time.
[01:46:42.220 --> 01:46:48.220]  We need every spare penny we can get and we cannot make any promises that we can pay anything back.
[01:46:48.220 --> 01:47:02.220]  So in fact, like I said earlier, I was about to run a fundraiser to try to raise $5,000 anyway to pay for the operating expenses for this radio station because we've been not radio station for this radio network because we've been falling further and further behind.
[01:47:02.220 --> 01:47:11.220]  Randy was a significant financial contributor. Now he is not in a position to do that. We need every penny we can get our hands on right now. We're not taking any loans at this time.
[01:47:11.220 --> 01:47:22.220]  So I just want to put that out there. Okay, we are going to go to our calls now. Chad in Texas. Chad, thank you for calling in. What is your question tonight?
[01:47:22.220 --> 01:47:42.220]  Thanks, Deborah. I was going to point out that the Texas Constitution spells out rights of the accused, not of a defendant. And I think that's a distinction that should be made in your motions and filings. Don't refer to yourself as a defendant, but rather as a accused.
[01:47:42.220 --> 01:48:02.220]  Particularly when you are not accepting the legitimacy of a charging instrument, you know, if you're challenging jurisdiction, you're accused. Somebody said you did something, but that doesn't have the same legal force as a legitimate legal charge.
[01:48:02.220 --> 01:48:14.220]  So I wanted to point out, and I was going to, on Randy's deal, I was going to ask about, what about a writ of mandamus? Would that maybe be appropriate?
[01:48:14.220 --> 01:48:24.220]  No, because you have to exhaust all remedies in law before you pursue remedies in equity, and a mandamus is a remedy in equity.
[01:48:24.220 --> 01:48:32.220]  Well, but isn't the standard all reasonable?
[01:48:32.220 --> 01:48:50.220]  No, you have to exhaust all remedies in law before you pursue remedies in equity. If you have not exhausted all remedies in law that are available first, when you go to file a writ of mandamus, the higher court will deny it, saying that you did not exhaust all your other remedies first.
[01:48:50.220 --> 01:49:04.220]  Yeah, they do exactly the same thing in civil torches when they say you failed to exhaust all of your administrative remedies, and if you missed even one, they'll dismiss everything. So she's correct on that, no doubt.
[01:49:04.220 --> 01:49:26.220]  Well, they may indeed dismiss it or just disregard it, but I'm looking at the language from a court decision here, and a key word in there is an adequate remedy where there's an adequate remedy at law, and I think if he's going to be held for a year, then an appeal is not really an adequate remedy at law.
[01:49:26.220 --> 01:49:28.220]  Yes, it is. It absolutely is.
[01:49:28.220 --> 01:49:40.220]  Yeah, an appeal is the mandatory remedy for a conviction. The problem here is that there was never really a conviction because there was never really a trial.
[01:49:40.220 --> 01:49:57.220]  So it leaves us with a whole new category of things to have to deal with. So right now that dumps us back on two possibilities, a new trial for a trial that never happened legally or a habeas corpus if we can get somebody to hear it.
[01:49:57.220 --> 01:50:14.220]  And even the habeas, they're probably not going to hear because, again, that's another remedy in equity. And so the court will probably say you have not exhausted all your remedies in law first, which include a motion for new trial and a notice of appeal.
[01:50:14.220 --> 01:50:19.220]  Well, again, though, that would be true if the first trial was valid.
[01:50:19.220 --> 01:50:20.220]  I realize that.
[01:50:20.220 --> 01:50:24.220]  The first trial is void, and the order from that trial is void.
[01:50:24.220 --> 01:50:30.220]  I realize that. I realize that. And that's what we've been talking about off the air and tonight on the air.
[01:50:30.220 --> 01:50:35.220]  But what I'm saying is, and what Harmon is saying is that the courts are just going to say that anyway.
[01:50:35.220 --> 01:50:44.220]  They're just going to, even though the court, the original court didn't have jurisdiction in the first place, how can we have a new trial when they never had jurisdiction for the first trial?
[01:50:44.220 --> 01:50:50.220]  If we don't file the motion for new trial anyway and the notice of appeal, they're not even going to entertain the habeas.
[01:50:50.220 --> 01:50:54.220]  And they certainly aren't going to entertain any mandamus.
[01:50:54.220 --> 01:51:05.220]  And besides, you have to know what you want to ask for for a mandamus anyway, because a mandamus is when you ask a higher court to order a lower court to do something.
[01:51:05.220 --> 01:51:11.220]  And you have to have good reason for it, and you have to show that you've exhausted all your other remedies first.
[01:51:11.220 --> 01:51:22.220]  And you can find those reasons in this pretty informative S.A.F. on online. It's called Putting on the Writts. That's W-R-I-T-S. Writts of Mandamus in Texas by Helen Cassidy.
[01:51:22.220 --> 01:51:36.220]  And here it says, as the Supreme Court has repeatedly stated, an appellate remedy is not inadequate merely because it may involve more expense or delay than obtaining mandamus relief.
[01:51:36.220 --> 01:51:46.220]  But this is not just simply an expense or delay. His liberty is being held with his liberty restricted against his will.
[01:51:46.220 --> 01:51:58.220]  Well, that's why they post an appeal bond amount. So when you file for the appeal, they post an amount of an appeal bond, hence the fundraiser.
[01:51:58.220 --> 01:52:05.220]  You post an appeal bond and you get to get out of jail while you're waiting for your appeal.
[01:52:05.220 --> 01:52:11.220]  Okay. Well, I guess I didn't really have anything too helpful there then.
[01:52:11.220 --> 01:52:19.220]  Yeah, I'll be making a donation real soon to try and help out with that and, you know, best of luck.
[01:52:19.220 --> 01:52:25.220]  If I can think of anything, I'll try to let y'all know whatever I can figure out.
[01:52:25.220 --> 01:52:27.220]  All right. Thanks, Chad.
[01:52:27.220 --> 01:52:48.220]  So when a mandamus would be appropriate in this situation is if, once we file notice of appeal, if the court refuses to post the appeal bond amount, then we file a writ of mandamus with a court of appeals saying, asking them to order the lower court to post the amount of the appeal bond.
[01:52:48.220 --> 01:52:54.220]  That would be a case for an immediate mandamus, a situation for immediate mandamus.
[01:52:54.220 --> 01:53:06.220]  I think that there's a clear abuse of discretion there when the court overruled his objection on the lack of presentation of evidence.
[01:53:06.220 --> 01:53:11.220]  Absolutely. And that's something for the appeals court to look at.
[01:53:11.220 --> 01:53:12.220]  Okay.
[01:53:12.220 --> 01:53:17.220]  The appeals court would have to review the record.
[01:53:17.220 --> 01:53:22.220]  We have to take things up through the proper stages, through the proper phases.
[01:53:22.220 --> 01:53:25.220]  Jump six steps down the line.
[01:53:25.220 --> 01:53:31.220]  No matter how crooked the idiots were in the entire chain of command that got us there.
[01:53:31.220 --> 01:53:33.220]  Well, at least, unfortunately.
[01:53:33.220 --> 01:53:39.220]  If you're being held in jail, I have priority in appeal over those who are not in jail.
[01:53:39.220 --> 01:53:47.220]  But, I mean, if he takes the appeal bond, though, if that gets out, then I guess he wouldn't have that higher priority if someone is held.
[01:53:47.220 --> 01:53:51.220]  I don't know what their priority system is or if they even have one.
[01:53:51.220 --> 01:53:55.220]  If they probably just take them in the order that they come.
[01:53:55.220 --> 01:54:00.220]  Well, except that it starts with those who are held in jail.
[01:54:00.220 --> 01:54:01.220]  Right.
[01:54:01.220 --> 01:54:03.220]  According to law.
[01:54:03.220 --> 01:54:04.220]  Right.
[01:54:04.220 --> 01:54:11.220]  But anyway, okay, we'll appreciate you all being on the air and I'll talk to you again.
[01:54:11.220 --> 01:54:13.220]  Okay, thanks, Chad.
[01:54:13.220 --> 01:54:15.220]  Okay, bye.
[01:54:15.220 --> 01:54:18.220]  All right, we're going now to George in Texas.
[01:54:18.220 --> 01:54:20.220]  George, thank you for calling in.
[01:54:20.220 --> 01:54:22.220]  What is your question for us tonight?
[01:54:22.220 --> 01:54:27.220]  This is a providential call because I happen to, I'm in Austin, Texas, visiting.
[01:54:27.220 --> 01:54:38.220]  This is my 14th state and I was downtown at a demonstration with my car going around the block and the police gave me a ticket for impeding traffic during rush hour.
[01:54:38.220 --> 01:54:51.220]  And I was stopped a lot of times by cars in front of me and I'm just wondering what defense I can offer to a court when, in fact, I was not really impeding traffic.
[01:54:51.220 --> 01:54:57.220]  Traffic was very, very heavy during the time that I was downtown.
[01:54:57.220 --> 01:55:03.220]  Well, as far as the defense, it would depend on exactly what they're trying to charge you under.
[01:55:03.220 --> 01:55:07.220]  Are they trying to charge you under a city ordinance or state statute?
[01:55:07.220 --> 01:55:14.220]  And what is going to be their evidence that you were impeding traffic?
[01:55:14.220 --> 01:55:16.220]  See, that's the problem.
[01:55:16.220 --> 01:55:20.220]  Who are they going to bring in to testify that you impeded them?
[01:55:20.220 --> 01:55:22.220]  Yeah.
[01:55:22.220 --> 01:55:24.220]  It can't be the officer.
[01:55:24.220 --> 01:55:26.220]  He's the accuser.
[01:55:26.220 --> 01:55:28.220]  Uh-huh.
[01:55:28.220 --> 01:55:30.220]  Okay.
[01:55:30.220 --> 01:55:33.220]  Well, I'm a visitor from two Texas.
[01:55:33.220 --> 01:55:35.220]  This is my 14th state and he had to...
[01:55:35.220 --> 01:55:39.220]  Well, please don't judge all of Texas by these idiots.
[01:55:39.220 --> 01:55:40.220]  No, I know.
[01:55:40.220 --> 01:55:43.220]  But the thing about it is the officer asked me, he said, how many...
[01:55:43.220 --> 01:55:45.220]  I said, he said, how many states...
[01:55:45.220 --> 01:55:47.220]  How many other states have you gotten a ticket in?
[01:55:47.220 --> 01:55:49.220]  I said, I've never gotten a ticket.
[01:55:49.220 --> 01:55:52.220]  And he said, well, you're getting one today.
[01:55:52.220 --> 01:56:01.220]  And they had a bunch of long-haired maggots out there denigrating the country and I would save America first to evangelize the world.
[01:56:01.220 --> 01:56:06.220]  And I was just going around the block giving out the gospel of Jesus Christ.
[01:56:06.220 --> 01:56:08.220]  And he gave me a ticket.
[01:56:08.220 --> 01:56:12.220]  I was down in New Orleans on Bourbon Street and they didn't give me a ticket.
[01:56:12.220 --> 01:56:17.220]  And I come into Austin and downtown and he says, well, how many other states have you been?
[01:56:17.220 --> 01:56:20.220]  I said, this is my 14th state.
[01:56:20.220 --> 01:56:21.220]  And how many tickets you've gotten?
[01:56:21.220 --> 01:56:23.220]  I said, I haven't gotten one.
[01:56:23.220 --> 01:56:24.220]  So are you going to get one now?
[01:56:24.220 --> 01:56:27.220]  And he charged me with impeding traffic.
[01:56:27.220 --> 01:56:38.220]  It's ridiculous because I wasn't, it was a rush hour situation and a lot of times I couldn't even move my car because of the minor traffic that was on the road in front of me.
[01:56:38.220 --> 01:56:40.220]  Well, how long are you visiting for, George?
[01:56:40.220 --> 01:56:44.220]  Well, I'll visit as long as I need to be.
[01:56:44.220 --> 01:56:48.220]  I'm a minister and, you know, I'm a...
[01:56:48.220 --> 01:56:53.220]  Well, how long you need to be can be quite varied on that ticket.
[01:56:53.220 --> 01:56:56.220]  The question is, what do you want to do about it?
[01:56:56.220 --> 01:56:59.220]  Pay it so you can leave when you want to?
[01:56:59.220 --> 01:57:05.220]  Or do you want to fight it, which means you could be here awhile or be making a lot of trips back?
[01:57:05.220 --> 01:57:07.220]  I would like to fight it.
[01:57:07.220 --> 01:57:08.220]  Okay.
[01:57:08.220 --> 01:57:15.220]  Then if you would write down my email address and I will get with you offline about the things you need to start doing.
[01:57:15.220 --> 01:57:16.220]  Okay.
[01:57:16.220 --> 01:57:18.220]  I'm going to write your email address right now, sir.
[01:57:18.220 --> 01:57:19.220]  Okay.
[01:57:19.220 --> 01:57:21.220]  My wife is going to write this down.
[01:57:21.220 --> 01:57:22.220]  All right.
[01:57:22.220 --> 01:57:29.220]  It is eddyedde... One second, sir, please.
[01:57:29.220 --> 01:57:30.220]  Okay.
[01:57:30.220 --> 01:57:31.220]  Say it, sir.
[01:57:31.220 --> 01:57:34.220]  It is eddyedde...
[01:57:34.220 --> 01:57:36.220]  eddyedde...
[01:57:36.220 --> 01:57:40.220]  at ruleoflawradio.com
[01:57:40.220 --> 01:57:43.220]  at ruleoflaw...
[01:57:43.220 --> 01:57:46.220]  at ruleoflawradio.com
[01:57:46.220 --> 01:57:48.220]  at ruleoflawradio.com
[01:57:48.220 --> 01:57:51.220]  at ruleoflawradio.com
[01:57:51.220 --> 01:57:53.220]  at ruleoflawradio.com
[01:57:53.220 --> 01:57:55.220]  at ruleoflawradio.com
[01:57:55.220 --> 01:57:56.220]  Right.
[01:57:56.220 --> 01:58:00.220]  I will certainly email you a very short one.
[01:58:00.220 --> 01:58:01.220]  Okay.
[01:58:01.220 --> 01:58:03.220]  Thank you, folks.
[01:58:03.220 --> 01:58:05.220]  Thank you, George.
[01:58:05.220 --> 01:58:06.220]  All right, folks.
[01:58:06.220 --> 01:58:08.220]  That's the show for tonight.
[01:58:08.220 --> 01:58:11.220]  Remember, right now, Friday Night shows are suspended.
[01:58:11.220 --> 01:58:14.220]  We are running archives until we're able to get Randy out and back.
[01:58:14.220 --> 01:58:17.220]  But the Monday and Thursday shows, we are here.
[01:58:17.220 --> 01:58:19.220]  We will be running them.
[01:58:19.220 --> 01:58:21.220]  So please tune in.
[01:58:21.220 --> 01:58:23.220]  Keep with us so we can keep you updated
[01:58:23.220 --> 01:58:25.220]  on whatever's going on in Randy's case.
[01:58:25.220 --> 01:58:27.220]  Thank you all for your support
[01:58:27.220 --> 01:58:29.220]  and being here for us.
[01:58:29.220 --> 01:58:31.220]  And may God bless you all.
[01:58:31.220 --> 01:58:33.220]  This is Deborah, Eddie, and Randy,
[01:58:33.220 --> 01:58:35.220]  signing off on ruleoflawradio.
[01:58:35.220 --> 01:59:00.220]  Thank you.
[01:59:00.220 --> 01:59:05.220]  The Bible's for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible
[01:59:05.220 --> 01:59:08.220]  called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:59:08.220 --> 01:59:11.220]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes
[01:59:11.220 --> 01:59:14.220]  that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse,
[01:59:14.220 --> 01:59:18.220]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:18.220 --> 01:59:21.220]  Order your free copy today from Bible's for America.
[01:59:21.220 --> 01:59:26.220]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:26.220 --> 01:59:30.220]  or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:30.220 --> 01:59:32.220]  This translation is highly accurate
[01:59:32.220 --> 01:59:35.220]  and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:35.220 --> 01:59:38.220]  plus charts and maps and an outline
[01:59:38.220 --> 01:59:40.220]  for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:40.220 --> 01:59:42.220]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:42.220 --> 01:59:45.220]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:45.220 --> 01:59:50.220]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:50.220 --> 01:59:54.220]  That's 888-551-0102
[01:59:54.220 --> 01:59:59.220]  or visit us online at bfa.org.