ROL_2011-07-25_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:04.600]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[00:04.600 --> 00:09.600]  France has agreed to purchase unmanned drones from Israel, ending a 42-year-old embargo
[00:09.600 --> 00:14.240]  on weapons purchases. President Charles de Gaulle ordered the ban during the Six-Day
[00:14.240 --> 00:19.280]  War, criticizing Israel for occupying the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, and refusing
[00:19.280 --> 00:25.320]  to recognize Israel's control of Jerusalem. Israel's drones were used in its January 2009
[00:25.320 --> 00:33.840]  assault on Gaza, which killed 1,400 Palestinians and inflicted over $1.6 billion in damage.
[00:33.840 --> 00:40.320]  The hotel maid who accused former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn of sexual assault appeared
[00:40.320 --> 00:47.120]  on ABC Monday. Nafisa To Diallo told ABC's Robin Roberts of encountering Strauss-Kahn
[00:47.120 --> 00:52.480]  in a hotel room and her subsequent sexual assault. Diallo said when she learned from
[00:52.480 --> 00:57.760]  news reports Strauss-Kahn was one of the most powerful men in the world, she cried, quote,
[00:57.760 --> 01:01.640]  oh my God, they are going to kill me.
[01:01.640 --> 01:06.160]  Norwegian and Canadian scientists warned in the journal Nature recently the warming of
[01:06.160 --> 01:11.880]  the Arctic is releasing toxic chemicals that have been trapped in the ice and cold water.
[01:11.880 --> 01:20.280]  Toxic chemicals seeping out include pesticides, industrial chemicals, and the fungicide hexachlorobenzene.
[01:20.280 --> 01:25.200]  Congress is currently considering three major trade agreements that would eliminate regulations
[01:25.200 --> 01:31.240]  limiting the flow of capital and goods between the U.S., South Korea, Colombia, and Panama.
[01:31.240 --> 01:37.200]  Huge retailers see cheaper goods. Major financial institutions see access to new markets and
[01:37.200 --> 01:43.160]  the free flow of capital. Pharmaceutical companies would get extended patent protection and multinational
[01:43.160 --> 01:48.520]  companies see opportunities to shift their global supply chains to maximize profits.
[01:48.520 --> 01:53.520]  Critics say the deals could send hundreds of thousands of U.S. jobs overseas. With so much
[01:53.520 --> 01:58.720]  attention focused on Congress' debt ceiling negotiations, the major lobbying effort by
[01:58.720 --> 02:03.800]  America's largest corporations for the three trade bills has been taking place outside
[02:03.800 --> 02:09.640]  public view. A South Korean trade deal has received the most attention, led by top lobbyists
[02:09.640 --> 02:15.800]  of Boeing, Chevron, Pfizer, Goldman Sachs, and Citigroup, who claim with straight faces
[02:15.800 --> 02:21.560]  it will, quote, create new American jobs and opportunities for economic growth.
[02:21.560 --> 02:27.320]  70 percent of the Japanese public supports Prime Minister Naoto Kahn's policy to make
[02:27.320 --> 02:32.320]  the country nuclear-free in future, but most people still want him to quit. The new survey
[02:32.320 --> 02:38.400]  conducted this past weekend by Kyoto News Agency showed 70.3 percent supported Kahn's
[02:38.400 --> 02:43.800]  policy of ending nuclear power, while 66.9 percent think he should leave office by the
[02:43.800 --> 02:48.760]  end of August. The premier is under intense pressure to quit from political adversaries
[02:48.760 --> 02:53.520]  who accuse him of having bungled Japan's response to the tsunami. Kahn's skepticism
[02:53.520 --> 02:58.640]  about boosting nuclear power in the quake-prone country has also set him on a collision course
[02:58.640 --> 03:24.640]  with pro-nuclear lawmakers, both in the conservative opposition and within his own party.
[03:24.640 --> 03:53.640]  All right, folks. Good evening. This is Kahn. Thank you very much for joining us.
[03:53.640 --> 03:59.080]  Good evening. This is Rule of Law Radio. This is Eddie Craig, Debra Stevens, Randy Kelton.
[03:59.080 --> 04:06.480]  It is Monday night, July 25, 2011. Tonight is traffic night, so we will be going over
[04:06.480 --> 04:11.640]  that. I do have some material that I want to talk about in some updates I'm doing to
[04:11.640 --> 04:17.840]  the seminar documents, most specifically the motion on challenging the authority of the
[04:17.840 --> 04:24.960]  city attorney. We've uncovered some new issues. The new variation of this that I'm doing
[04:24.960 --> 04:32.440]  is the old one contained a lot of information, but it was not very well organized. I wrote
[04:32.440 --> 04:39.800]  it on the fly. I tried to encompass as many issues as possible within its text and to
[04:39.800 --> 04:45.960]  make sure that all the proper challenges were there, but they were haphazardly strong
[04:45.960 --> 04:52.320]  about the document. I have since gone back and I have completely cleaned it up. I have
[04:52.320 --> 05:00.600]  completely organized it. I now break it down by subject. Let me just give you an example
[05:00.600 --> 05:06.680]  of what we're talking about here for subject. For instance, we go into the outline portion
[05:06.680 --> 05:12.920]  of the document and I've got it outlined with the following structure. We've got the introduction,
[05:12.920 --> 05:19.240]  the facts and the argument, then within the argument section we have the section titled
[05:19.240 --> 05:27.160]  Jurisdiction of Municipal Courts. In that section we deal specifically and entirely with what
[05:27.160 --> 05:33.760]  is the jurisdiction of a municipal court. Then we break that section down two more times
[05:33.760 --> 05:41.160]  once into its jurisdiction relating to ordinances and another in its jurisdiction relating to
[05:41.160 --> 05:51.240]  state law. Then we go down to the next section who may prosecute in a municipal court. We
[05:51.240 --> 06:01.080]  break that down as well. We talk about who may prosecute as an attorney for the state.
[06:01.080 --> 06:07.280]  Beneath that we then discuss those that the Constitution says and the statute say are
[06:07.280 --> 06:13.760]  competent and qualified to act in the official capacity of an attorney for the state. So we
[06:13.760 --> 06:19.360]  talk about the county attorney and we also talk about the district attorney and we talk
[06:19.360 --> 06:26.520]  about the assignment of an attorney pro temp and lastly we talk about the city slash corporate
[06:26.520 --> 06:33.560]  attorney. Then we go and we also talk about within that same section the authority to
[06:33.560 --> 06:41.480]  prepare and file charging instruments. Who can do that? And as you've seen in statute
[06:41.480 --> 06:50.320]  if you've been to my class or read this motion, the city attorney cannot sign and file a charging
[06:50.320 --> 06:58.840]  instrument. How can he try a case for the state when by law and Constitution he is
[06:58.840 --> 07:06.200]  forbidden to act in that official capacity as an attorney for the state and he is forbidden
[07:06.200 --> 07:14.800]  to put his name on a charging instrument and file it with the court. It's absolutely
[07:14.800 --> 07:21.160]  illegal for him to do it and if it's illegal for him to do that it's illegal for him to
[07:21.160 --> 07:28.880]  represent the state. But that's getting in the details. Let's go back up to this again.
[07:28.880 --> 07:39.960]  The next section we're doing which is 3D is constitutional requirements that apply. Then
[07:39.960 --> 07:48.760]  we have oath of office requirements. City attorneys do not have oaths of office and
[07:48.760 --> 07:56.560]  anti bribery statements. Go look it up. They simply don't have them. This is completely
[07:56.560 --> 08:05.400]  compounded when there is no full time employed city attorney. When we're dealing with a law
[08:05.400 --> 08:15.080]  firm that contracts with the city to prosecute these cases in municipal court, I guarantee
[08:15.080 --> 08:19.880]  you none of the people that come in to prosecute from that law firm have an oath of office
[08:19.880 --> 08:29.240]  of any kind. Absolutely none. Now without an oath of office they're not bound to uphold
[08:29.240 --> 08:34.240]  the Constitution. They're not bound to even uphold the laws of the state. They can do
[08:34.240 --> 08:40.280]  whatever they want and as we know from these lower courts way of managing their cases,
[08:40.280 --> 08:50.380]  they do that anyway. But there's simply no governor on what they can do without that
[08:50.380 --> 08:56.040]  oath of office and that anti bribery statement. They're not publicly accountable to the people
[08:56.040 --> 09:05.680]  for their actions and that's just not how we the people set this government up. Now
[09:05.680 --> 09:10.800]  besides the oath requirements, we get into the public accountability of the office holder,
[09:10.800 --> 09:18.440]  something we just talked about. We also go into the constitutional challenges regarding
[09:18.440 --> 09:26.120]  such an attorney to hold such an office. They don't meet any of the constitutional requirements
[09:26.120 --> 09:30.840]  because they're not a county or district attorney or a criminal district attorney which are
[09:30.840 --> 09:36.040]  the only attorneys named in the Constitution as having the authority to act in that official
[09:36.040 --> 09:43.280]  capacity. They're the only ones that can sign a charging instrument, namely an information.
[09:43.280 --> 09:49.400]  They're the only ones that can file it. We know for a fact under 2.05 code of criminal
[09:49.400 --> 09:56.040]  procedure that an information is required. We know from Article 5, Section 12B of the
[09:56.040 --> 10:03.600]  Texas Constitution that an information is required. But we also know from Article 5,
[10:03.600 --> 10:14.440]  Section 17 that an indictment by a grand jury is required. And yet none of these city attorneys
[10:14.440 --> 10:23.680]  have any capacity to get any of these things into a case they're prosecuting. At the absolute
[10:23.680 --> 10:31.440]  most a city attorney's authority to prosecute can only be for violations of a city ordinance
[10:31.440 --> 10:38.520]  which brings up a whole nother can of worms for them and I'll get into that in a few minutes.
[10:38.520 --> 10:43.560]  But after we make our constitutional challenges, now we go and do some specifics that we need
[10:43.560 --> 10:49.680]  to make the court aware of. And that is Section 3E of this motion which states crimes have
[10:49.680 --> 10:58.320]  been committed under color of law. Then we outline in detail how this alleged city attorney
[10:58.320 --> 11:05.720]  slash prosecutor has committed the crime of impersonating a public servant. When this
[11:05.720 --> 11:11.160]  city attorney is attempting to act as an attorney for the state, he can only be impersonating
[11:11.160 --> 11:16.760]  a county district or criminal district attorney. They're the only ones authorized to act in
[11:16.760 --> 11:22.920]  that official capacity. So if he tries to do it, then he is impersonating a duly elected
[11:22.920 --> 11:30.640]  public official. That's a crime. We also have, since he is trying to act under the color
[11:30.640 --> 11:36.200]  of an office he cannot possibly hold, and he's invoking the power of that office in
[11:36.200 --> 11:41.960]  a manner oppressive to the due process rights of the people, they're committing the act
[11:41.960 --> 11:49.560]  of abuse of official capacity. That would also constitute the act of official oppression.
[11:49.560 --> 11:57.000]  If we can prove, which it shouldn't be hard, that one or more of these city's attorneys
[11:57.000 --> 12:04.240]  within the city attorney's office conspired or colluded together or in conjunction with
[12:04.240 --> 12:15.200]  the judge of the municipal or justice court to impersonate this public official, then
[12:15.200 --> 12:21.320]  we can get them for criminal conspiracy. We can also get them for organized criminal
[12:21.320 --> 12:31.240]  activity. Now, since we make them aware through the means of this motion that these crimes
[12:31.240 --> 12:38.960]  have been perpetrated and the evidence is documented within this motion per the statute,
[12:38.960 --> 12:46.480]  the Constitution, and the case law that we will put into this, then when the prosecuting
[12:46.480 --> 12:53.480]  attorney of any kind refuses to press charges against the judge and submit the information
[12:53.480 --> 13:01.560]  to a grand jury as required by law or to a proper magistrate to be handed to the grand
[13:01.560 --> 13:13.840]  jury, or the judge acts to protect this attorney from being prosecuted, now we have them on
[13:13.840 --> 13:23.400]  penal code 38.05, hindering apprehension or prosecution. Now, we can also show that because
[13:23.400 --> 13:31.440]  these are allegedly licensed attorneys sitting both in the capacity of judge and, unless
[13:31.440 --> 13:38.160]  of course we're dealing with a justice who may or may not be a licensed attorney, but
[13:38.160 --> 13:45.160]  the prosecutor is certainly going to be, because they are licensed professionals that
[13:45.160 --> 13:52.480]  fall under the penal code regarding the charge of baritry, and we can make the argument that
[13:52.480 --> 13:59.960]  they seek a financial benefit through getting paid to continue this process, think about
[13:59.960 --> 14:05.680]  it, they facilitate their own paycheck by ensuring that prosecutions are maintained
[14:05.680 --> 14:11.960]  within this court for the purpose, specific purpose of generating revenue that is used
[14:11.960 --> 14:19.680]  to pay for what they do. Tell me there's not a financial benefit or an economic benefit
[14:19.680 --> 14:28.960]  interest in what they do. You'll never convince me that that's not the case. Then last but
[14:28.960 --> 14:35.040]  not least, we have an entire laundry list of violations of ministerial duties under
[14:35.040 --> 14:39.760]  law, which is pretty much the entire code of criminal procedure, where the magistrate
[14:39.760 --> 14:45.480]  and the prosecutor act in concert and collusion to deny the due process procedure rights to
[14:45.480 --> 14:53.520]  every defendant that appears before them. Then finally, we come to the conclusion and
[14:53.520 --> 14:57.560]  then we make our lawful demand. Most attorneys would call this a prayer. Well, I tell you
[14:57.560 --> 15:03.440]  what, I for one, take it how you will, but I'm not going to pray to a man, woman or anything
[15:03.440 --> 15:10.240]  else wearing a black dress, a suit or any type of official title. It's simply not going
[15:10.240 --> 15:18.680]  to happen. So none of my documents contain prayers and I won't write them that way. So
[15:18.680 --> 15:23.320]  if you want to alter them to that, when you get the seminar material, be my guest, but
[15:23.320 --> 15:31.400]  I'm not going to do it. And that's my reasoning for it. Now, this document, hopefully I'll
[15:31.400 --> 15:36.160]  have it done by two or three in the morning at least. I've been working on it all day
[15:36.160 --> 15:41.640]  today. But through the course of the day, I've had several phone calls and cries for help
[15:41.640 --> 15:46.160]  and we do have people out there that we're going to call in tonight about the reasons
[15:46.160 --> 15:51.520]  they were contacting me today. So after Deborah gets done with some material she's got to
[15:51.520 --> 15:56.120]  present on the other side of the break, then we will open the phone lines and start taking
[15:56.120 --> 16:01.000]  your calls. So if you're out there and listening in and you've got an issue, question or one
[16:01.000 --> 16:05.400]  of the people that called today and said you needed to call in, please go ahead and get
[16:05.400 --> 16:09.800]  on the caller board and get ready to do that. And as soon as Deborah is done on the other
[16:09.800 --> 16:17.160]  side of the break, we will start taking your calls. The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[16:17.160 --> 16:26.720]  Again, like I say, this is Monday night, the 25th of July, 2011. So we are live and not
[16:26.720 --> 16:33.880]  Memorex at the moment. The seminar material, I will be posting a new set of updates as
[16:33.880 --> 16:39.360]  far as the documents. I do have the material moved to the new book format as well and I'm
[16:39.360 --> 16:44.000]  trying to get new material inserted. So those updates will be forthcoming within the next
[16:44.000 --> 16:49.280]  week or two at the most. This is Ruel Laugh Radio, Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy
[16:49.280 --> 17:00.800]  Kelton. We'll be right back on the other side of the break.
[17:00.800 --> 17:05.520]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals and coin supplies
[17:05.520 --> 17:10.960]  in the Austin Metro area. We also ship worldwide. We're a family owned and operated business
[17:10.960 --> 17:16.160]  that offers competitive prices on your coin and metals purchases. Because of you, Austin,
[17:16.160 --> 17:20.560]  business has been so good that we've had to move to a new and bigger location. We're
[17:20.560 --> 17:26.800]  now located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, 1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous
[17:26.800 --> 17:31.320]  location. We're on the west side of Burnett Road in the Stanley Insurance building on
[17:31.320 --> 17:35.960]  the ground floor next to the Ishibon Sushi and the Genie Car Wash. We're open Monday
[17:35.960 --> 17:40.640]  through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 5. You're welcome to stop in during regular
[17:40.640 --> 17:47.720]  business hours or call 512-646-644-0. Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about
[17:47.720 --> 17:52.600]  us on Ruel Laugh Radio or Texas Liberty Radio. That's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new
[17:52.600 --> 18:00.360]  location at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A. We'll call 512-646-644-0.
[18:00.360 --> 18:05.680]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses?
[18:05.680 --> 18:10.560]  Ask debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method. Michael Mirris has won six
[18:10.560 --> 18:15.720]  cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll get step-by-step
[18:15.720 --> 18:21.000]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:25.960]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone
[18:25.960 --> 18:30.200]  calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports? How to turn the financial
[18:30.200 --> 18:35.760]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Mirris Proven Method is
[18:35.760 --> 18:41.200]  the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.200 --> 18:46.720]  For more information, please visit RuelLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner
[18:46.720 --> 18:56.120]  or email MichaelMirris at yahoo.com. That's RuelLawRadio.com or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S
[18:56.120 --> 19:03.120]  at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[20:26.120 --> 20:51.120]  Alright folks, we are back. RuelLaw Radio, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number. This is
[20:51.120 --> 20:56.280]  Eddie Craig, Debra Stevens, Randy Kelton. Ms. Debra, you said there was some information
[20:56.280 --> 20:59.800]  you needed to bring up before we started taking calls.
[20:59.800 --> 21:07.600]  Yeah, I just have an announcement to make concerning the future of the network, RuelLaw
[21:07.600 --> 21:16.840]  Radio Network. As folks probably know, we're basically funding this out of our own pockets.
[21:16.840 --> 21:24.960]  Me and Randy and Jerry, mostly Randy and Jerry. I don't have a job other than this and basically
[21:24.960 --> 21:33.760]  I work for free. We have a few sponsors that basically the income from those sponsors don't
[21:33.760 --> 21:38.480]  even really cover the cost of the infrastructure of this network, the monthly infrastructure
[21:38.480 --> 21:43.440]  bills. Plus, like I said, I don't get paid anything for my time. Alright, if it wasn't
[21:43.440 --> 21:48.640]  for Randy and my husband Jerry, we would not have a network right now. This show would
[21:48.640 --> 21:53.480]  not be on the air and the other shows would not be on the air. Alright, it's getting harder
[21:53.480 --> 22:00.240]  and harder for us to maintain this situation when we just are not getting the income to
[22:00.240 --> 22:08.080]  pay the basic infrastructure bills. It requires a lot of bandwidth, it requires a lot of telephone,
[22:08.080 --> 22:15.920]  resources, electricity to run all the equipment. I mean, the list goes on. So there has to
[22:15.920 --> 22:21.400]  be regular maintenance on the equipment, replacing of computers and hard drives and things like
[22:21.400 --> 22:28.080]  this. Like I said, not to even mention my time. One of the reasons that I have never
[22:28.080 --> 22:35.960]  done any marketing or promotion to try to promote this network or market it or place
[22:35.960 --> 22:40.640]  advertising banners on other people's websites and stuff like that is because we don't have
[22:40.640 --> 22:46.600]  a website. I mean, we have a website, but it's not the kind of a website that is professional
[22:46.600 --> 22:55.240]  enough to market and promote. Alright, we mostly rely on our listenership from our affiliates.
[22:55.240 --> 23:01.160]  We have a dozen or so AM and FM affiliates throughout the country, but that's not bringing
[23:01.160 --> 23:05.720]  in any sponsors. That's not bringing in any income. We love to do what we're doing. We
[23:05.720 --> 23:13.480]  love to get the word out to folks, but it's just financially not, it's not feasible anymore.
[23:13.480 --> 23:22.080]  And I can't promote or market the network without a website. We need to increase our
[23:22.080 --> 23:27.400]  stream numbers on Shoutcast so that we can have something to show prospective sponsors
[23:27.400 --> 23:32.920]  so we can start getting some real hard hitting sponsors around here to pay for the infrastructure
[23:32.920 --> 23:38.800]  costs and hopefully at some point maybe even pay me for my time so that we can take things
[23:38.800 --> 23:43.680]  to the next level. We want to get the word out to more people so we can help more people.
[23:43.680 --> 23:49.920]  And there's no way any of this is going to happen unless we get a professional website.
[23:49.920 --> 23:56.560]  Now I feel like I'm wearing 25 hats around here doing the job literally of 25 people
[23:56.560 --> 24:05.240]  all by myself, not to mention all of my time when I'm not producing shows is taken up being
[24:05.240 --> 24:14.600]  on the legal team to defend 90.1. Plus I'm also co-producing a noble lie, the documentary
[24:14.600 --> 24:19.480]  of the Oklahoma City bombing. And I'm not getting paid for either one of those two things.
[24:19.480 --> 24:27.280]  I will get paid on the back end of the documentary from DVD sales later. But as far as spending
[24:27.280 --> 24:31.480]  all my time defending 90.1 that is a labor of love. I'll never get paid anything for
[24:31.480 --> 24:38.320]  that. So the point is all of my time is taken up producing shows, defending 90.1, working
[24:38.320 --> 24:43.680]  on this documentary and a couple of other cases that I'm involved with that don't pay
[24:43.680 --> 24:51.200]  anything either. I do not have time to learn how to become a hard hitting cutting edge
[24:51.200 --> 24:57.720]  top of the line webmaster which I do know how to do some programming code but I don't
[24:57.720 --> 25:03.560]  have the time to learn how to become a cutting edge webmaster in order to build a website
[25:03.560 --> 25:09.520]  that is promotable and marketable. You've got to have a website if this network is going
[25:09.520 --> 25:14.720]  to continue. I've been praying about this for a long time that someone, some well-meaning
[25:14.720 --> 25:19.800]  patriot would come our way that would be able to donate some of their time and their skills
[25:19.800 --> 25:28.400]  to this matter. Finally it has happened. Gentlemen's name is Eric Sayward from We Are Change Wisconsin
[25:28.400 --> 25:35.280]  and this is what he does for a living. He designs top of the line cutting edge websites
[25:35.280 --> 25:42.280]  that are not just glossy in look but are backed up with databases and engines and he builds
[25:42.280 --> 25:49.160]  social networking sites and things like this and he also deals with marketing and promotion.
[25:49.160 --> 25:55.760]  So Eric Sayward, he charges $100 an hour for this kind of work. I charge $100 an hour for
[25:55.760 --> 26:03.680]  the kind of work that I do. We all have skills here that we are donating to different areas
[26:03.680 --> 26:12.520]  and Eric is giving me an 85% discount on his time but he still needs to get paid something
[26:12.520 --> 26:18.560]  for his time. So we are doing a money bomb. Eric Sayward and I are doing a money bomb
[26:18.560 --> 26:24.320]  for the rule of law radio website. We actually need to build two more websites, one for the
[26:24.320 --> 26:33.280]  network and one just for our show. And so we are trying to raise $1,000 which actually
[26:33.280 --> 26:41.000]  is about a 90% discount that he is giving me. I am going to get $10,000 worth of top of
[26:41.000 --> 26:48.840]  the line web guru web mastering with full on databases and social networking on the
[26:48.840 --> 26:57.640]  site, search engine optimization, marketing, promotion, keywords, Google ad keywords, everything
[26:57.640 --> 27:02.280]  so that we can take this network to the next level. But he has got to get paid something
[27:02.280 --> 27:08.000]  for his time too. So he has given me a 90% discount for his time. We need to raise $1,000
[27:08.000 --> 27:13.480]  within the next month. And so listeners, I am calling out to you to please help us here
[27:13.480 --> 27:18.720]  because my time is maxed out. Literally I get about 5.5 hours of sleep a night because
[27:18.720 --> 27:23.360]  I am working so hard on the projects that I am working on. And again, I just do not
[27:23.360 --> 27:28.760]  have the time to learn how to become a web guru in order to build another website. Eric
[27:28.760 --> 27:32.680]  has stepped up to the plate to help but I need the listeners to step up to the plate to
[27:32.680 --> 27:37.640]  help too because I do not have $1,000 to give him. So I am begging the listeners, I am
[27:37.640 --> 27:42.680]  calling out and asking the listeners to please go to ruleoflawradio.com and you will see
[27:42.680 --> 27:49.520]  the chip in button. And you can copy that widget and post it on your own website to
[27:49.520 --> 27:55.560]  try to spread the message. There is a very special sweet message from Eric Sayword on
[27:55.560 --> 28:00.280]  the website right underneath the chip in button but folks, this is not a small thing and I
[28:00.280 --> 28:04.640]  am not joking. We have to have a website. We have to have a professional website if
[28:04.640 --> 28:09.400]  we are ever going to take this network to the next level if we are even going to continue
[28:09.400 --> 28:16.200]  really. We have got to be able to start making a business out of this. Randy and Jerry and
[28:16.200 --> 28:21.840]  I cannot continue forever, forever, forever just to fund this endeavor out of our own
[28:21.840 --> 28:27.000]  pockets. It is just not feasible. So we appreciate all the listener donations and we do appreciate
[28:27.000 --> 28:31.360]  the sponsors that we have but it is just not sufficient. We have to make this a professional
[28:31.360 --> 28:38.680]  endeavor. So folks, please go to ruleoflawradio.com and click on the chip in even if you just
[28:38.680 --> 28:44.240]  give a dollar. I know we have thousands of listeners out there. If we get 1,000 people
[28:44.240 --> 28:50.120]  giving a dollar, we will make it. Again, Eric is giving me a 90% discount. This is what
[28:50.120 --> 28:54.600]  he does for a living. He believes in the cause. He is the founder of We Are Change Wisconsin
[28:54.600 --> 29:01.120]  and so I am going to get $10,000 worth of web mastering which will certainly be enough
[29:01.120 --> 29:06.920]  to build two hard hitting websites and the listeners will be able to talk to each other
[29:06.920 --> 29:12.960]  and it will be a social networking site. You will be able to leave comments, everything.
[29:12.960 --> 29:19.400]  Forums, you name it. Tracking statistics, everything will be totally automated and everything
[29:19.400 --> 29:23.120]  will be much nicer. There will be pages for every host. The hosts will be able to log
[29:23.120 --> 29:26.360]  in to their own page and post upcoming guests. You will be able to leave comments on the
[29:26.360 --> 29:31.200]  different host pages. Everything is going to be so great but we have to raise this money.
[29:31.200 --> 29:34.800]  So I just want to put out that call. I am going to be asking all the hosts for this
[29:34.800 --> 29:41.160]  next month to keep plugging this. In $1,000 really is not that much, folks. So please
[29:41.160 --> 29:45.800]  in the grand scheme of things, we really would appreciate any donations that you can to help
[29:45.800 --> 29:51.360]  us get a new website, a professional website so we can start in a marketing and promotion
[29:51.360 --> 29:56.600]  advertising campaign, increase our listenership and get some sponsors. Alright, with that
[29:56.600 --> 30:02.240]  we will be right back. We will take a call. I lost my son. My uncle. My uncle. My son.
[30:02.240 --> 30:07.760]  On September 11, 2001. Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September
[30:07.760 --> 30:13.000]  11. World Trade Center 7, a 47 story skyscraper was not hit by a plane. Although the official
[30:13.000 --> 30:18.800]  exclamation is that fire brought down building 7. Over 1,200 architects and engineers have
[30:18.800 --> 30:22.760]  looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story. Bring justice to my
[30:22.760 --> 30:28.800]  son. My uncle. My nephew. My son. Go to building what.org. Why it fell. Why it matters. As
[30:28.800 --> 30:35.000]  what you can do. Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information and you may trust
[30:35.000 --> 30:39.840]  them to keep it safe. But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly
[30:39.840 --> 30:45.960]  revealing your secrets. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with details.
[30:45.960 --> 30:51.160]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again.
[30:51.160 --> 30:55.960]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So
[30:55.960 --> 31:02.080]  protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[31:02.080 --> 31:07.240]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com.
[31:07.240 --> 31:15.240]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with startpage.
[31:15.240 --> 31:20.000]  Data privacy is a big deal. So nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle
[31:20.000 --> 31:24.760]  your personal information. But what happens if it escapes their control? It's not an
[31:24.760 --> 31:30.480]  idle question. According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their
[31:30.480 --> 31:35.480]  security was breached by hackers in the last year. That's one more reason you should trust
[31:35.480 --> 31:41.040]  your searches to startpage.com. Unlike other search engines, startpage doesn't store any
[31:41.040 --> 31:44.960]  data on you. They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing
[31:44.960 --> 31:49.720]  for criminals to see. The cupboard would be bare. Too bad other companies don't treat
[31:49.720 --> 31:54.760]  your data the same way. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at
[31:54.760 --> 32:10.040]  Dr. Catherine Albrecht.com. Yeah, I got that one rent. And I'm going to solve them. To
[32:10.040 --> 32:26.320]  the government them. Prosecute them. Okay. Oh, sir. Decisions are rest. Oh, tabush. Decisions
[32:26.320 --> 32:34.840]  are rest for the team. Well, I need a prosecutor to come and help me. Prosecute them wicked
[32:34.840 --> 32:41.840]  people. Decisions are rest. Oh, tabush. Decisions are rest for the team. Well, I need a prosecutor
[32:41.840 --> 32:47.840]  to come and help me. Prosecute them wicked people. Decisions are rest for the team. Well,
[32:47.840 --> 33:05.840]  I need a prosecutor to come and help me. Prosecute them wicked people. Decisions are rest for
[33:05.840 --> 33:14.840]  the team. Well, I need a prosecutor to come and help me. Prosecute them wicked people.
[33:14.840 --> 33:22.840]  Call in number is 512-646-1984. The boards are open. We are ready to take your calls.
[33:22.840 --> 33:28.040]  So any of you that called me today needing help and was talking about coming online tonight
[33:28.040 --> 33:32.520]  to discuss those issues on air, please feel free to give us a call. While we're waiting
[33:32.520 --> 33:37.280]  for that to happen, I would like to go into a little bit of detail in one section of this
[33:37.280 --> 33:42.240]  motion that I was talking about on challenging the authority of a city attorney to prosecute
[33:42.240 --> 33:49.480]  in the name of the state and in the official capacity of an attorney for the state. And
[33:49.480 --> 33:54.920]  that is in the section regarding the attorney pro temp. Now, if you're familiar with the
[33:54.920 --> 34:03.200]  Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, you know that the attorney pro temp is dealt with in
[34:03.200 --> 34:13.440]  2.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2.07 breaks down exactly who and how an attorney
[34:13.440 --> 34:20.720]  pro temp is appointed and who is allowed to do it. For instance, it clearly shows that
[34:20.720 --> 34:28.080]  the judge of the court where the attorney pro temp normally practices may appoint the
[34:28.080 --> 34:36.680]  attorney for the state normally practices may appoint the attorney pro temp if the attorney
[34:36.680 --> 34:48.840]  for the state is unable through some reason, whether they're disqualified, have a conflict
[34:48.840 --> 34:56.160]  of interest or are absolutely unable to perform their official duties at that time in that
[34:56.160 --> 35:03.480]  case, then the judge can appoint an attorney pro temp. Now, when you read down through
[35:03.480 --> 35:12.200]  that, it says the judge may appoint any competent attorney. Now, I know for a fact that a lot
[35:12.200 --> 35:18.480]  of these lower court judges and their prosecuting attorneys take that to immediately mean that
[35:18.480 --> 35:29.160]  any attorney can do it. Wrong answer. Absolutely not the case. Attorney pro temp is actually
[35:29.160 --> 35:41.160]  defined in 2.07 and it says that it includes an assistant attorney general. Now, what is
[35:41.160 --> 35:47.280]  the main distinction we're drawn here between a city attorney, which don't forget can be
[35:47.280 --> 35:52.800]  someone that's permanently employed by the city or it can be a private attorney from
[35:52.800 --> 36:00.240]  a private law firm that's been hired to act on behalf of the city and an assistant attorney
[36:00.240 --> 36:09.240]  general. What is the real distinction between those two capacities? The assistant attorney
[36:09.240 --> 36:17.060]  general is an appointed position under the office of state attorney general and as such
[36:17.060 --> 36:27.280]  it has an absolute requirement for the article 16 section 1 O's and officer statement. An
[36:27.280 --> 36:36.720]  assistant attorney general must have those things. Now, since the city attorney position
[36:36.720 --> 36:45.800]  is not from all appearances necessarily a permanent actual official position within
[36:45.800 --> 36:55.360]  the city then it can't be said to be an official office of a political subdivision. We can
[36:55.360 --> 37:03.800]  make that argument because a private attorney can serve in that capacity on a contract basis
[37:03.800 --> 37:11.560]  and they can do it per incident. They don't have to do it on a continuing basis. They're
[37:11.560 --> 37:16.560]  free to contract with as many different attorneys in as many different instances as they need
[37:16.560 --> 37:22.400]  to represent the interest of the city as an attorney for the state or I'm sorry an attorney
[37:22.400 --> 37:33.240]  for the city. So these guys will almost certainly not have an oath of office or an officer statement
[37:33.240 --> 37:41.840]  slash anti bribery statement because they don't have these things. There is absolutely no way
[37:41.840 --> 37:51.040]  they can be acting in an official capacity. The Texas Constitution is very clear any elected
[37:51.040 --> 37:58.680]  or appointed official must take the O's of office. These guys don't have it because they're
[37:58.680 --> 38:05.360]  not acting in an official capacity. Since they're not acting in an official capacity
[38:05.360 --> 38:11.840]  as a city attorney, they can't act in the official capacity of an attorney for the state
[38:11.840 --> 38:17.560]  which the Texas Constitution article five section 21 says very clearly is only a county
[38:17.560 --> 38:25.440]  district or criminal district attorney. That's it folks. There is nobody else mentioned there
[38:25.440 --> 38:32.360]  at all with any authority whatsoever to act in the official capacity or constitutional
[38:32.360 --> 38:43.120]  capacity of attorney for the state. So the argument I'm making in the motion is fairly
[38:43.120 --> 38:51.320]  simple. Since 2.07 requires that the attorney pro tem take the oath of office when they're
[38:51.320 --> 38:58.560]  appointed. Let's look at who else is required to do this when they're asked to fill in in
[38:58.560 --> 39:08.120]  a temporary capacity. When a visiting judge comes to a venue in which he was not elected
[39:08.120 --> 39:18.520]  or appointed to serve. Chapter 54 of the government code says that that judge must take the O's
[39:18.520 --> 39:29.560]  of office. They must file them and they have to do this every time they sit in that visiting
[39:29.560 --> 39:40.400]  venue. Get that? They can't do it once and stay there and come in 10 days in a row and
[39:40.400 --> 39:49.600]  sit. Every time they come in for the purpose of sitting in any session and the session is
[39:49.600 --> 39:57.600]  until they adjourn the court and a new session starts when they bring the court to order
[39:57.600 --> 40:02.400]  then they have to retake those O's every time their black dressed butt hits the leather
[40:02.400 --> 40:13.800]  chair. If they don't do that they're not abiding by the government code chapter 54 requirements.
[40:13.800 --> 40:21.480]  It makes perfect sense that a district or county attorney that is being asked to temporarily
[40:21.480 --> 40:30.320]  fill in for another district or county attorney must do the same thing. If they're appearing
[40:30.320 --> 40:37.840]  as a visiting attorney for the state in a venue where they were not elected to represent
[40:37.840 --> 40:45.720]  the people then it makes perfect sense that just like a visiting judge those guys must
[40:45.720 --> 40:53.880]  take the O's also because they are not in their normal venue. They are not acting in
[40:53.880 --> 41:08.480]  their normal capacity within their normal venue. Now it may just be me but these guys
[41:08.480 --> 41:20.440]  have had how many years and decades to get this crap right and they want to tell us that
[41:20.440 --> 41:29.000]  we're not smart enough to understand what they do. Come on give me a break. I've seen
[41:29.000 --> 41:35.880]  garbage with higher IQs than some of these people. I've thrown away more things with
[41:35.880 --> 41:39.760]  higher IQs than some of these people. Eddie they don't want to get it. They don't think
[41:39.760 --> 41:49.000]  they have to. Well I'd go along with that but you know willful ignorance is still ignorance
[41:49.000 --> 41:55.080]  and these guys have that in spades but when you look at what the reasoning behind this
[41:55.080 --> 42:04.640]  is one of the next projects I've got is to go back and research how 45.201 of the Code
[42:04.640 --> 42:11.840]  of Criminal Procedure which is where the legislature passed the alleged authority when it created
[42:11.840 --> 42:17.720]  the statute which reads all prosecutions in a municipal court shall be conducted by the
[42:17.720 --> 42:29.360]  city attorney. Problem if the case involves a state law then the criminal complaint must
[42:29.360 --> 42:39.280]  begin and end in and by the authority of the state of Texas and it must conclude with
[42:39.280 --> 42:47.080]  against the peace and dignity of the state. So whoever prosecutes this must act under
[42:47.080 --> 42:57.000]  the authority of the state not the municipality and article 5 section 21 of the Texas Constitution
[42:57.000 --> 43:08.440]  says only a county district or criminal district attorney can do that not a city attorney.
[43:08.440 --> 43:14.680]  So my research is to go back and find out where this originated and how and what type
[43:14.680 --> 43:24.040]  of discussion took place for some idiot to conclude that oh yeah we can do that because
[43:24.040 --> 43:31.160]  what this really amounts to if my research proves what my theory is is that the reason
[43:31.160 --> 43:35.640]  this came into existence was pretty simple and Jim I see you on the board there so if
[43:35.640 --> 43:39.200]  you give me just a few minutes on the other side of the break I promise to get to you
[43:39.200 --> 43:46.640]  I just want to wrap up this thought. Post calling number is 512-646-1984. The caller
[43:46.640 --> 43:51.960]  board is open and empty except for Jim so please give us a call. This is Eddie Craig,
[43:51.960 --> 43:56.480]  Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton, rule of law radio. We'll be right back on the other side
[43:56.480 --> 44:05.240]  of the break. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[44:05.240 --> 44:10.840]  with Jurisdictionary, the affordable easy to understand four CD course that will show
[44:10.840 --> 44:17.520]  you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should
[44:17.520 --> 44:22.880]  be doing. If you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself. Thousands
[44:22.880 --> 44:28.840]  have won with our step by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[44:28.840 --> 44:34.760]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in
[44:34.760 --> 44:40.400]  the lawsuit you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices
[44:40.400 --> 44:47.400]  that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[44:47.400 --> 44:54.480]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[44:54.480 --> 45:01.400]  and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.400 --> 45:06.360]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM but finding things on the internet isn't so
[45:06.360 --> 45:11.200]  easy and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with. Oh well I guess you haven't
[45:11.200 --> 45:16.480]  heard of Brave New Books then. Brave New Books? Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and
[45:16.480 --> 45:21.360]  DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul and G. Edward Griffin. They
[45:21.360 --> 45:27.680]  even stock Interfood, Burkey products and Calvin Soaps. There's no way a place like that exists.
[45:27.680 --> 45:33.360]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street just south of UT.
[45:33.360 --> 45:38.400]  Oh by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there. Actually they now offer a free
[45:38.400 --> 45:45.120]  hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[45:45.120 --> 45:51.040]  It does exist but when are they open? Monday through Saturday, 11am to 9pm and
[45:51.040 --> 45:57.600]  1-6pm on Sundays. So get them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events
[45:57.600 --> 45:59.600]  page at BraveNewBooksStore.com.
[45:59.600 --> 46:29.520]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the call-in numbers.
[46:29.520 --> 46:35.960]  512-646-1984. This is Eddie Craig, Debra Stevens and Randy Kelton. It is Monday night, traffic
[46:35.960 --> 46:40.160]  night. Jim, I see you on the board. Give me just a couple more minutes and I'll get this
[46:40.160 --> 46:48.680]  wrapped up and we'll take your call. Now, real quick, my theory on why 45.201 was created
[46:48.680 --> 46:54.880]  by the legislature. Let's imagine at this time that the state knows that it cannot
[46:54.880 --> 47:03.400]  hire enough state troopers because it doesn't have the budget that they need in order to
[47:03.400 --> 47:12.640]  pay for them. So, some legislator comes up with the idea that, hey, let's try this. Let's
[47:12.640 --> 47:20.240]  contract, so to speak, with the political subdivisions. Let's legislatively give them
[47:20.240 --> 47:28.280]  a license to steal as long as they agree to pay us a portion of the proceeds from their
[47:28.280 --> 47:38.160]  acts of thievery. And in so doing, they also knew that this would create an additional
[47:38.160 --> 47:49.600]  burden on the courts themselves because through this machination they invented to raise revenue
[47:49.600 --> 47:57.600]  through these hidden methods of taxation, they were going to create a very large uptick
[47:57.600 --> 48:04.840]  in the number of court cases that would have to be handled by the county and district attorneys.
[48:04.840 --> 48:12.840]  Now, they didn't really want to have to distract the county and district attorneys from prosecuting
[48:12.840 --> 48:21.800]  the more serious cases, and they also knew that they didn't necessarily have enough JPs
[48:21.800 --> 48:32.440]  to do it either. So, they instead created an authority to the local corporation itself,
[48:32.440 --> 48:41.120]  meaning the municipality, to facilitate its own court and its own prosecutors for the
[48:41.120 --> 48:52.120]  purpose of generating that extra revenue of which they get a share. Now, if ever there
[48:52.120 --> 49:01.360]  was a financial desire to perpetrate fraud upon the public, pretty much like the income
[49:01.360 --> 49:09.680]  tax, this would be it. This is exactly how we have fallen into the publicly recognized
[49:09.680 --> 49:19.520]  institution of policing for profit. That's my theory on how we got here. Now, it's our
[49:19.520 --> 49:27.040]  job to unwind that coil of wire they're trying to put around our neck in order to extract
[49:27.040 --> 49:36.120]  money from us through these hidden taxes in fines and fees. I've got to spend some time
[49:36.120 --> 49:41.200]  down at the state law library doing the backwards research on this, but I'm willing to bet
[49:41.200 --> 49:48.080]  that if when I dig back through to the beginning of this, which I'm pretty sure was 1965, that's
[49:48.080 --> 49:53.440]  what I'm going to find. The discussion led to the point where there was a need for extra
[49:53.440 --> 50:00.800]  revenue. They knew the state couldn't handle it, so they invented a license to steal and
[50:00.800 --> 50:10.080]  gave it to the municipalities and the counties. We need to take that license away. Okay, that's
[50:10.080 --> 50:14.560]  all I've got on that. Right now, I'm going to go ahead and take Jim in Texas. Jim, how
[50:14.560 --> 50:21.280]  are you doing and what can we do for you? I'm doing pretty good. I've been thinking,
[50:21.280 --> 50:26.320]  you know, we've had such problem getting the judges in the courts to recognize so many
[50:26.320 --> 50:32.640]  of the issues that we're bringing up like you're talking about right now, you know,
[50:32.640 --> 50:39.080]  they just try to ignore it. I think it was Thursday night, Robert had called in with
[50:39.080 --> 50:48.160]  a ticket he got on his way back to Texas from another state. What would be the possibility,
[50:48.160 --> 50:53.880]  what do you think the possibility would be on somebody like that having something removed
[50:53.880 --> 51:01.120]  to the federal district court under diversity? And I think wouldn't it make it a lot easier
[51:01.120 --> 51:07.720]  to get your motions heard, the things that you need to be able to do? It might, but there's
[51:07.720 --> 51:15.240]  also one other way to get it in the federal court. Either party can move a case, any criminal
[51:15.240 --> 51:23.920]  case, the federal court, if they can show that their unalienable protected rights would
[51:23.920 --> 51:32.400]  not be protected at the state level within the state venue. We can most certainly make
[51:32.400 --> 51:39.720]  the argument, especially in Texas, that there's no way in high heaven you're going to have
[51:39.720 --> 51:48.360]  your rights protected in these lower courts. Right. And that was my thing. I mean, if we
[51:48.360 --> 51:55.080]  filed it or we fight it and we want to appeal their stupid little decision, then you file
[51:55.080 --> 52:00.040]  your appeal bond and they sit on it. So it's really hard to get it there, but if you take
[52:00.040 --> 52:06.960]  it into the federal court, then you have all of your discovery tools, you have all of your,
[52:06.960 --> 52:13.640]  the federal court's a little stricter on what they will not, I mean, they'll let you do
[52:13.640 --> 52:19.640]  what you need to do as far as what you're supposed to be able to do. Right. And force
[52:19.640 --> 52:24.400]  some of these little people to come into the federal court. I don't think they want to
[52:24.400 --> 52:29.000]  go there with their argument. Well, that's probably true, provided, of course, you can
[52:29.000 --> 52:36.920]  get them to move it as the law requires them to do. They're not allowed to say no. Well,
[52:36.920 --> 52:41.560]  from the federal court can turn around and say, not an issue we want to deal with and
[52:41.560 --> 52:46.360]  hand it back down, but the state court has no authority to say no, not going to let
[52:46.360 --> 52:55.720]  you move it. Sorry. But well, from what I've read, I mean, it can be moved automatically.
[52:55.720 --> 53:02.360]  I mean, if the federal court says that it doesn't have jurisdiction, it's supposed to
[53:02.360 --> 53:10.080]  remand, which they never seem to do. They just dismissed out of hand. But if it was under
[53:10.080 --> 53:19.440]  diversity, they really have to take it, don't they? I don't think any court has to take
[53:19.440 --> 53:26.520]  anything. That's part of the problem. And I do agree that it can be removed automatically.
[53:26.520 --> 53:34.200]  Another party simply must file notice of removal. That's all that's required. Then the hard
[53:34.200 --> 53:42.560]  part becomes making the removal motion to the federal court in such a way as to show
[53:42.560 --> 53:51.840]  that your particular rights will not be upheld at the state level. So you have no choice
[53:51.840 --> 53:59.440]  but to move it to the federal level. I see where you're at there. I mean, it was just
[53:59.440 --> 54:05.760]  a thought that, I mean... Jim, have you ever seen anybody successfully remove like a traffic
[54:05.760 --> 54:12.880]  ticket to federal court under diversity? No, I haven't. But I mean, all of the prerequisites
[54:12.880 --> 54:19.400]  are there. Under diversity, what I was thinking because Robert had called in the other day,
[54:19.400 --> 54:25.680]  he was in another state. So that would be a foreign government coming against you. So
[54:25.680 --> 54:33.560]  that would be a sure thing to be able to remove for under diversity. Now, within the state,
[54:33.560 --> 54:37.720]  like if we're here in Austin or something to try to move it...
[54:37.720 --> 54:42.640]  Well, now, just remember one thing, Jim. In the diversity, you're talking about criminal
[54:42.640 --> 54:49.840]  versus civil. What you're talking about is a suit between citizens of individual states
[54:49.840 --> 54:57.880]  against each other. Well, our foreign government. Our foreign government. But when a crime is
[54:57.880 --> 55:03.040]  committed within the jurisdiction of that foreign government or state, that's not a
[55:03.040 --> 55:09.880]  diversity jurisdiction. You're removed from wherever you normally would be into the direct
[55:09.880 --> 55:17.720]  jurisdiction of that government. That's why, you know, you're extradited basically.
[55:17.720 --> 55:23.720]  Well, that may be true. Now, the deal here is, though, is the extradition
[55:23.720 --> 55:31.960]  proper. For instance, the law specifically requires that before any citizen may be extradited
[55:31.960 --> 55:39.920]  to any foreign jurisdiction, including that of other states, said order of extradition
[55:39.920 --> 55:48.720]  must be signed by the governor of the state in which the defendant or the accused lives
[55:48.720 --> 55:56.880]  or is. Right. Now, that almost never happens.
[55:56.880 --> 56:04.840]  You know, well, it's like if I got a ticket in Austin, I should be able to have it moved
[56:04.840 --> 56:12.880]  to the court where I'm at here in Leon County. Well, not if the act was within the jurisdiction
[56:12.880 --> 56:24.680]  of the court here. The jurisdiction will reside in the venue where the alleged defense was
[56:24.680 --> 56:27.280]  committed. Yeah, this is criminal we're talking about,
[56:27.280 --> 56:32.560]  not civil. If it was a civil matter, then, yeah, you could get the case transferred to
[56:32.560 --> 56:37.200]  wherever your residence is, the district of your residence, but not with criminal.
[56:37.200 --> 56:42.360]  No, maybe. Maybe I've been reading too much in the civil.
[56:42.360 --> 56:50.080]  Yeah, in the case of the criminal, the court must have three jurisdiction, subject matter,
[56:50.080 --> 56:56.000]  name, personum, and venue. Right. If they don't have any of those, they have none of
[56:56.000 --> 57:03.520]  those. If they have all but one of them, they have none of them.
[57:03.520 --> 57:09.800]  They got to have all three. So if they lack venue, which is what you're discussing here,
[57:09.800 --> 57:15.440]  then they don't have anything. Right. Now, this is exactly what brings up the
[57:15.440 --> 57:22.760]  problem that I have found with where the Texas legislature has allowed municipalities and
[57:22.760 --> 57:32.960]  counties that border each other to try cases that occurred in the other venue. Severe problem
[57:32.960 --> 57:39.680]  with that. But right here in Austin between Travis and Wilson County, that's exactly what
[57:39.680 --> 57:48.800]  they're doing. And I cannot find any authority for the legislature to allow for that type
[57:48.800 --> 57:54.640]  of venue change to occur. Right.
[57:54.640 --> 58:01.280]  But it's something they've done. And we need to put a stop to it.
[58:01.280 --> 58:05.400]  In the court. Right here. Go ahead, Jim. We got about a minute.
[58:05.400 --> 58:12.360]  I was just trying to figure out, I mean, if it all actions are civil actions, and it's
[58:12.360 --> 58:17.560]  the way they're tried, whether they become civil or criminal, or they become criminal.
[58:17.560 --> 58:23.520]  Right. No. Criminal and civil are two totally separate
[58:23.520 --> 58:33.480]  areas of law. In the rules of civil procedure, it says that all actions are civil in nature
[58:33.480 --> 58:41.360]  to start with. It may say that, but they don't act on it,
[58:41.360 --> 58:47.240]  definitely. I think maybe a civil suit could start out civil and then possibly turn into
[58:47.240 --> 58:53.080]  criminal depending on the evidence. But Jim, just hang on the line, folks. We have open
[58:53.080 --> 59:00.000]  phone lines. Please call in 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[59:00.000 --> 59:04.120]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[59:04.120 --> 59:09.320]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[59:09.320 --> 59:12.560]  can really help. The New Testament recovery version is one
[59:12.560 --> 59:17.560]  of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation and it
[59:17.560 --> 59:21.960]  contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning
[59:21.960 --> 59:25.640]  of life. The free books are a three-volume set called
[59:25.640 --> 59:30.640]  Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:30.640 --> 59:36.600]  Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the
[59:36.600 --> 59:39.640]  church. To order your free New Testament recovery
[59:39.640 --> 59:46.240]  version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at
[59:46.240 --> 59:58.960]  888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:58.960 --> 01:00:04.240]  This news brief brought to you by the International Moves Next.
[01:00:04.240 --> 01:00:09.080]  Two months after launching a movement against the economic crisis and soaring unemployment,
[01:00:09.080 --> 01:00:14.880]  Spain's self-described indignant protesters converged on Madrid Saturday. Several cross-country
[01:00:14.880 --> 01:00:19.960]  protest marches reached the city's Puerto del Sol Square, gathering under a huge banner
[01:00:19.960 --> 01:00:25.100]  that read, Stop the New World Order. Protesters have won broad public support in their fight
[01:00:25.100 --> 01:00:30.640]  against austerity measures, 21% unemployment and corrupt politicians.
[01:00:30.640 --> 01:00:37.040]  At least 231 people were injured in Cairo Saturday after knife-wielding thugs attacked
[01:00:37.040 --> 01:00:41.840]  protesters, calling for the downfall of the country's ruling military council. Witnesses
[01:00:41.840 --> 01:00:47.040]  said most injuries occurred when provocateurs standing in front of military blockades hurled
[01:00:47.040 --> 01:00:53.760]  stones and at these six firebombs at demonstrators. The military did not intervene.
[01:00:53.760 --> 01:00:59.240]  According to the Commission on War Time Contracting, the U.S. has wasted some $34 billion on private
[01:00:59.240 --> 01:01:05.000]  sector contracts in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan where more than $200 billion has been doled
[01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:11.040]  out over nearly a decade. The Bipartisan Congressional Commission found more than 200,000 contractors
[01:01:11.040 --> 01:01:19.040]  have been on the U.S. payroll in Iraq and Afghanistan, outstripping the number of U.S. troops.
[01:01:19.040 --> 01:01:23.840]  As Norway grieved Monday for the victims of twin attacks that killed at least 75 people
[01:01:23.840 --> 01:01:29.880]  Friday, Anders Bering Brevik, the Norwegian arrested for the massacre, was in court, charged
[01:01:29.880 --> 01:01:34.760]  with setting a car bomb in downtown Oslo. At least seven people died in the blast in
[01:01:34.760 --> 01:01:39.120]  front of the oil ministry, which also targeted the office power containing the offices of
[01:01:39.120 --> 01:01:44.960]  Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg. Following the blast, Brevik dressed as a police officer
[01:01:44.960 --> 01:01:50.280]  travelled to a summer camp on the island of Utoya, near Oslo for a security check. After
[01:01:50.280 --> 01:01:55.480]  gathering teenage campers together, he opened fire and proceeded to hunt down and kill dozens
[01:01:55.480 --> 01:02:00.880]  more. He continued killing until police made it to the island. Brevik pleaded not guilty
[01:02:00.880 --> 01:02:05.840]  claiming his actions were meant to save Europe from a Muslim-Marxist alliance that threatened
[01:02:05.840 --> 01:02:12.440]  to bring down European Christendom. Pakistan's The Nation magazine reports the U.S. has increased
[01:02:12.440 --> 01:02:19.520]  its contacts with influential figures in Pakistan's South Punjab in a bid to establish clandestine
[01:02:19.520 --> 01:02:25.080]  operations there. The renewed efforts came after Pakistan refused the U.S. permission
[01:02:25.080 --> 01:02:31.200]  to establish a consulate in Multan. The nation says the U.S. is using a diplomatic facade
[01:02:31.200 --> 01:02:36.840]  to secure niches for their spies and hitmen in and around Multan, following their agenda
[01:02:36.840 --> 01:02:43.240]  of weakening Pakistan. Ministry sources also said Foreign Minister Makhdoom Shah Mehmood
[01:02:43.240 --> 01:02:49.280]  Qureshi was replaced after Qureshi refused to forge documents, showing Raymond Davis,
[01:02:49.280 --> 01:02:55.280]  the CIA agent accused of murder, was in fact a diplomat and therefore immune from prosecution.
[01:02:55.280 --> 01:03:13.680]  You are listening to the Rural Law Radio Network at RuralLawRadio.com. Live free speech talk
[01:03:13.680 --> 01:03:40.680]  radio at its best. Hi folks, we are back. This is RuralLaw Radio 512-646-1984. As the
[01:03:40.680 --> 01:03:45.920]  call-in number, we are talking to Jim, but the call-in boards are open, so please give
[01:03:45.920 --> 01:03:52.520]  us a call. Okay, Jim. I can't find where I had read it, that all actions, they start
[01:03:52.520 --> 01:03:57.920]  out as civil, but they, you know, depending on what they were involved in was whether
[01:03:57.920 --> 01:04:05.320]  they were criminal or something. I think you're referring to something that is out of an old
[01:04:05.320 --> 01:04:11.480]  case, and it's a federal case actually, and it says that all crimes are civil. Right.
[01:04:11.480 --> 01:04:17.400]  Okay, that's not, as far as I know, that's not actually written into the Texas civil
[01:04:17.400 --> 01:04:22.720]  rules. I had read it somewhere, I read a lot, and I can't remember some of the places I
[01:04:22.720 --> 01:04:29.760]  read them in. Anyway, it was just a thought, I mean, in order to try to do something to
[01:04:29.760 --> 01:04:36.800]  get these people, I know what you're trying to do is very good, and I think it's better
[01:04:36.800 --> 01:04:45.560]  than anything we've had so far. I don't know, I think the original tree and noose prospect
[01:04:45.560 --> 01:04:53.200]  was the best thing we had so far. They don't make ropes long enough anymore. Or at least
[01:04:53.200 --> 01:04:58.800]  of good enough quality to hold that many. Yes, can't buy hemp rope anymore. Yeah, maybe
[01:04:58.800 --> 01:05:03.440]  that's why they knew how it would be used if it was still available. But anyway, it
[01:05:03.440 --> 01:05:09.160]  was just a thought, so I guess food for thought, and I'll keep listening, but you guys keep
[01:05:09.160 --> 01:05:14.520]  it up. I really appreciate everything you do, and hopefully I can get back to the seminar
[01:05:14.520 --> 01:05:21.480]  soon. Well, thanks Jim, appreciate that. Alright, take care. Thanks Jim. Alright folks, Jim
[01:05:21.480 --> 01:05:25.440]  was our only caller at the moment. If y'all don't give us a call and bring up some subject
[01:05:25.440 --> 01:05:29.600]  matter, y'all, I'll be out there listening to the sound of crickets. Nah, we won't let
[01:05:29.600 --> 01:05:34.520]  you go that far. Okay, while we're waiting on some more callers, let's figure out what
[01:05:34.520 --> 01:05:39.080]  else we can talk about here. And believe me, sitting around listening to me all day is
[01:05:39.080 --> 01:05:43.400]  not the best thing for your hearing. Well Eddie, I had a subject that I wanted to go
[01:05:43.400 --> 01:05:52.080]  over. Listening to some radio last couple of days, there seems to be a concept on another
[01:05:52.080 --> 01:05:59.320]  show that it's impossible to get rid of your court appointed attorney, or even a hired
[01:05:59.320 --> 01:06:05.400]  attorney for that matter. Once they're assigned, that's it, there's nothing you can do. And
[01:06:05.400 --> 01:06:10.440]  I know for a fact that that's not true. Now, whether or not you actually would want to
[01:06:10.440 --> 01:06:17.880]  get rid of a rogue attorney is another matter. We talk about some remedies here on our show
[01:06:17.880 --> 01:06:22.520]  that it's better to turn the screws on your court appointed attorney by different means
[01:06:22.520 --> 01:06:27.720]  rather than to get rid of them. But I wanted to discuss this matter that number one, if
[01:06:27.720 --> 01:06:34.800]  you really want to get rid of your court appointed attorney, you can. And then also want to talk
[01:06:34.800 --> 01:06:40.040]  about issues and remedies concerning why it may be better not to do that in the long run
[01:06:40.040 --> 01:06:44.400]  and just turn the screws on them. But I know one of the things, and Eddie, we talked about
[01:06:44.400 --> 01:06:48.520]  this last night also, one of the things that you can do, if you really want to get rid
[01:06:48.520 --> 01:06:53.040]  of your court appointed attorney, if you decide that that's the proper strategy, you file
[01:06:53.040 --> 01:06:59.840]  a motion to dismiss counsel for ineffective assistance, for ineffective assistance of counsel,
[01:06:59.840 --> 01:07:07.680]  and you document specific reasons and specific actions that this attorney has taken that basically
[01:07:07.680 --> 01:07:11.600]  show that he's not at or she is not acting in your best interest and not doing anything
[01:07:11.600 --> 01:07:18.360]  to defend you in the case. That's true. And that's one thing that you can do. Now, likely
[01:07:18.360 --> 01:07:25.120]  the judge is going to deny your motion or not bother with it or ignore it or whatever,
[01:07:25.120 --> 01:07:31.800]  in which case you could file a motion to disqualify the judge. Well, technically speaking though,
[01:07:31.800 --> 01:07:38.280]  the only way the judge can deny such a motion is if you as a defendant have already been
[01:07:38.280 --> 01:07:45.120]  declared incompetent to make decisions for yourself. That's technically the only way
[01:07:45.120 --> 01:07:53.280]  the judge can force you to keep the counsel that's there. Right. But if the judge does
[01:07:53.280 --> 01:07:59.320]  the likely corrupted, take the likely corrupted path, which is to deny your motion anyway,
[01:07:59.320 --> 01:08:02.280]  there are other remedies for that. And one of those things...
[01:08:02.280 --> 01:08:05.880]  Yes, they go directly after the judge. Go directly after the judge. You can file a motion
[01:08:05.880 --> 01:08:12.760]  to disqualify the judge. You could also file an interlocutory appeal, which is basically
[01:08:12.760 --> 01:08:19.120]  what means is that you file an appeal on that particular ruling only to the next higher
[01:08:19.120 --> 01:08:25.920]  court showing, look, there's no reason for this. If that interlocutory appeal gets denied,
[01:08:25.920 --> 01:08:30.720]  you could file a petition for rid of mandamus. There's always things that you could do.
[01:08:30.720 --> 01:08:37.600]  You could also launch into a malpractice lawsuit against your defense attorney. You could also
[01:08:37.600 --> 01:08:43.640]  file a bunch of bar grievances. And we've talked about this before on the show concerning
[01:08:43.640 --> 01:08:49.280]  the bar grievances. Of course, the bar is not going to adjudicate any of them or pay
[01:08:49.280 --> 01:08:53.280]  attention to any of them. They throw them all in the trash and say, we've looked into
[01:08:53.280 --> 01:08:59.400]  it and found that there's no malfeasance. But of course, that works in our favor because
[01:08:59.400 --> 01:09:05.520]  when it comes to the malpractice insurance companies for these attorneys, they know that
[01:09:05.520 --> 01:09:11.160]  the bar is going to deny and ignore all of these bar grievances. So how do they gauge
[01:09:11.160 --> 01:09:17.280]  their risk factor? They just have to assume all of them are true. And so they...
[01:09:17.280 --> 01:09:20.280]  And someone is going to eventually sue this guy.
[01:09:20.280 --> 01:09:25.280]  Exactly. And so after these attorneys get a certain number of bar grievances within
[01:09:25.280 --> 01:09:29.760]  a certain period of time, they lose their malpractice insurance. And that means they
[01:09:29.760 --> 01:09:35.840]  can't be an attorney anymore. So you start hitting them up with all these bar grievances.
[01:09:35.840 --> 01:09:40.240]  Believe me, it hurts. It raises their insurance rates after a certain length of time they
[01:09:40.240 --> 01:09:45.640]  can't even be an attorney anymore. Like I said, follow suit against them. There's always
[01:09:45.640 --> 01:09:51.480]  something that you can do. And from the stories that we've heard, once you start in with some
[01:09:51.480 --> 01:09:56.920]  of these things, the court-appointed attorney, that they ain't no problem to get rid of them
[01:09:56.920 --> 01:10:01.880]  because they go running to the judge begging and pleading to be removed from the case.
[01:10:01.880 --> 01:10:07.480]  Exactly. They'll go in and file a motion to withdraw as counsel. That's exactly. So that
[01:10:07.480 --> 01:10:13.000]  leads us to the third way to get rid of an attorney you don't like. You go after him
[01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:21.760]  so hard with bar grievances and complaints of a criminal nature and motions for sanctions
[01:10:21.760 --> 01:10:29.720]  against him to the judge that he wants to be gone. So bad it's not even funny.
[01:10:29.720 --> 01:10:38.280]  Yeah. You can get rid of them. In fact, the problem is keeping them on because if they
[01:10:38.280 --> 01:10:42.840]  don't do what you want them to do, you start in with some of these motions and some of
[01:10:42.840 --> 01:10:46.520]  these bar grievances and some of these remedies that we're suggesting here, they go running
[01:10:46.520 --> 01:10:51.800]  crying begging to get off the case. But the problem is actually keeping them on the case
[01:10:51.800 --> 01:10:56.160]  because then you have to go through the same thing all over again with the next attorney
[01:10:56.160 --> 01:11:00.440]  that gets assigned to the case. So actually in the long run, it may be better to keep
[01:11:00.440 --> 01:11:06.000]  these rogue attorneys and just turn the screws on them and put the pressure on them to do
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:13.240]  the right thing. And I know for a fact someone, this happened to my stepson. He was getting
[01:11:13.240 --> 01:11:19.600]  no justice, no remedy in a certain situation where he had a court appointed defense attorney
[01:11:19.600 --> 01:11:26.640]  and he wrote one letter, one letter to his defense attorney and said, look, you do what
[01:11:26.640 --> 01:11:32.280]  I tell you to do. You file for a motion to dismiss this case because there was no witness.
[01:11:32.280 --> 01:11:37.600]  There was no affidavit. There was no nothing. He said, he told him you file a motion to
[01:11:37.600 --> 01:11:44.520]  dismiss this case based on lack of evidence or else I'm going to bar grieve you into oblivion
[01:11:44.520 --> 01:11:49.960]  and file a malpractice suit against you. That's all it took. And the attorney did the right
[01:11:49.960 --> 01:11:55.840]  thing and my stepson was released. Well, the attorney did the self-serving thing. He did
[01:11:55.840 --> 01:12:00.040]  the self-serving thing exactly which was the right thing to do, but he didn't do it because
[01:12:00.040 --> 01:12:04.120]  it was the right thing to do. He did it because he was just trying to save his own buck. That's
[01:12:04.120 --> 01:12:09.560]  exactly right. So anyway, the point being you may not necessarily want to fire your
[01:12:09.560 --> 01:12:15.920]  attorney whether it's court appointed or whether you've hired. You may just want to turn the
[01:12:15.920 --> 01:12:21.240]  screws on them to make them do what you want them to do. And if that doesn't work, then
[01:12:21.240 --> 01:12:27.200]  you can take some of these other methods to actually get rid of them. So anyway, I just
[01:12:27.200 --> 01:12:32.640]  wanted to go over that because I did hear some talk about that on another show. And
[01:12:32.640 --> 01:12:35.920]  I wanted to, if anyone had heard that, I'm not going to mention which show it is. I wanted
[01:12:35.920 --> 01:12:41.720]  to dispel some of those myths that there's always something you can do. You don't have
[01:12:41.720 --> 01:12:47.880]  to just roll over and go, I have a court appointed attorney. I'm at the mercy of my court appointed
[01:12:47.880 --> 01:12:52.240]  attorney. There's nothing that I could do. No, that's not true. There's always something
[01:12:52.240 --> 01:12:55.960]  that you can do. Yeah. The only time that you truly are at their
[01:12:55.960 --> 01:13:01.600]  mercy, like I said, is when you have been declared legally incompetent and you are now
[01:13:01.600 --> 01:13:07.680]  a warrant of the court, making a point who they like to control you or represent you
[01:13:07.680 --> 01:13:14.240]  at that point. That would be the only time that your ability to do anything with your
[01:13:14.240 --> 01:13:19.480]  attorney is significantly diminished beyond your control. Yeah. And let me tell you what,
[01:13:19.480 --> 01:13:25.480]  if your defense attorney starts filing motions or making squawks about wanting to have you
[01:13:25.480 --> 01:13:33.280]  declared mentally incompetent or go through a competency exam, that is the time to start
[01:13:33.280 --> 01:13:39.040]  hitting them hard. And personally, if it was me, if my court appointed attorney, if I had
[01:13:39.040 --> 01:13:43.320]  a court appointed attorney that wanted to start pushing for a mental competency test
[01:13:43.320 --> 01:13:48.120]  or having me declared mentally incompetent, I would get rid of them. I would say, no,
[01:13:48.120 --> 01:13:51.160]  you know what, you don't get another chance. I'm not even going to try to pressure you
[01:13:51.160 --> 01:13:55.960]  into doing the right thing. You're gone. I mean, that's usually something a prosecutor
[01:13:55.960 --> 01:14:01.520]  would do, not your own defense attorney. That would be where I would draw the line. But
[01:14:01.520 --> 01:14:06.680]  yeah, if your defense attorney starts making any squawks about mental incompetency or taking
[01:14:06.680 --> 01:14:12.960]  a psyche vow or anything like that, just for me personally, I would say you're gone. Bye-bye.
[01:14:12.960 --> 01:14:17.200]  I'm doing everything I can to get rid of you. No. Uh-uh. That's not going to happen. And
[01:14:17.200 --> 01:14:22.880]  we've had Dr. Bill Vethon talk about that plenty. Don't ever take the psyche vow. Just
[01:14:22.880 --> 01:14:27.440]  don't do it. If the prosecutor's pushing for it, you do everything you can to fight
[01:14:27.440 --> 01:14:31.240]  it. Because once you're declared mentally incompetent by the court, you become a ward
[01:14:31.240 --> 01:14:37.560]  of the state, you cannot, uh, you can't sign any contracts. You can't hire an attorney.
[01:14:37.560 --> 01:14:44.760]  You can't do anything. It's worse than being convicted of a crime, really. It's the worst
[01:14:44.760 --> 01:14:50.880]  of the worst. So just don't ever take the psyche vow. Do not do it. So anyway, I just
[01:14:50.880 --> 01:14:54.400]  wanted to discuss some of that. Looks like we have a caller on the line. We've got Terry
[01:14:54.400 --> 01:14:59.120]  in Michigan. Hey, Terry, how you doing? Oh, not bad. How about you? Yeah, pretty good.
[01:14:59.120 --> 01:15:04.840]  We hadn't heard from you for a while. What's up? Well, I was wondering, um, what's the
[01:15:04.840 --> 01:15:10.240]  best way to find the original law when you're dealing especially with a, you know, driver's
[01:15:10.240 --> 01:15:16.160]  license and only being for commercial and that because as we know through the years,
[01:15:16.160 --> 01:15:21.160]  they condensed the law to appear different than the original intention. If you look at,
[01:15:21.160 --> 01:15:26.080]  if you look at the code, like say in Texas, it's a Texas transportation code on each
[01:15:26.080 --> 01:15:33.520]  section, it will list the acts of Congress that went down over the years to amend that
[01:15:33.520 --> 01:15:39.760]  section. It's generally there in the code. And then you have to go back and look up those
[01:15:39.760 --> 01:15:45.280]  sections of those acts of Congress and, and read and see where, which lines were struck
[01:15:45.280 --> 01:15:50.200]  and which lines were added, et cetera, et cetera, and chase it back. Yeah. And when
[01:15:50.200 --> 01:15:57.320]  you read it, you actually want to read the enrolled bill that was signed by the governor,
[01:15:57.320 --> 01:16:05.840]  which should be what is in the session law, the actual legislative enactment itself before
[01:16:05.840 --> 01:16:13.600]  the legislative drafting committee got their hands on it to turn it into a code because
[01:16:13.600 --> 01:16:21.880]  they will alter how it reads in a lot of ways. Whereas the discussion and especially the
[01:16:21.880 --> 01:16:27.680]  preamble of the particular enactment will tell you everything you need to know about
[01:16:27.680 --> 01:16:35.800]  what they can do with that act. For instance, here in Texas, the preamble must state every
[01:16:35.800 --> 01:16:42.680]  three things that bill is intended to do before they write the actual body of the enactment
[01:16:42.680 --> 01:16:47.760]  to do it. But if you'll hang on just a second Terry, we're going to go to break. Gary, we
[01:16:47.760 --> 01:16:54.040]  see you on the board as well. So y'all hang on. This is rule of law radio 512-646. 1984
[01:16:54.040 --> 01:17:00.600]  is the call in number. We'll be right back on the other side of this break.
[01:17:00.600 --> 01:17:04.840]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals, and coin
[01:17:04.840 --> 01:17:10.400]  supplies in the Austin metro area. We also ship worldwide. We're a family owned and operated
[01:17:10.400 --> 01:17:15.000]  business that offers competitive prices on your coin and metals purchases. Because of
[01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:20.360]  you, Austin, business has been so good that we've had to move to a new and bigger location.
[01:17:20.360 --> 01:17:26.640]  We're now located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, 1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous
[01:17:26.640 --> 01:17:31.520]  location. We're on the west side of Burnett Road in Stanley Insurance Building on the ground
[01:17:31.520 --> 01:17:36.640]  floor next to the Ishibon Sushi and the Genie Car Wash. We're open Monday through Friday,
[01:17:36.640 --> 01:17:41.600]  10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 5. You're welcome to stop in during regular business hours or
[01:17:41.600 --> 01:17:48.120]  call 512-646-644-0. Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us on rule of
[01:17:48.120 --> 01:17:54.480]  law radio or Texas Liberty Radio. That's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new location at 7304
[01:17:54.480 --> 01:18:00.200]  Burnett Road, Suite A. We'll call 512-646-644-0.
[01:18:00.200 --> 01:18:05.600]  My name is Randall Kelton and I co-host on rule of law radio. We specialize in showing
[01:18:05.600 --> 01:18:10.280]  people how to strike back against corrupt public officials. With the mortgage crisis
[01:18:10.280 --> 01:18:14.800]  worsening, we set our sights on finding a remedy for people who have been cheated by
[01:18:14.800 --> 01:18:19.640]  their lenders. If you have a mortgage or have paid yours off, you have probably been cheated
[01:18:19.640 --> 01:18:26.360]  out of thousands. But there is a remedy. Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call me at
[01:18:26.360 --> 01:18:34.080]  512-430-414-0 and find out how to use the consumer protection laws to recover what the
[01:18:34.080 --> 01:18:39.320]  lenders have stolen through fraud and deception. We will prepare for you a qualified written
[01:18:39.320 --> 01:18:45.080]  request that will expose the fraud and put the lenders on the dime. Lender fraud is bankrupting
[01:18:45.080 --> 01:18:55.120]  this country and it's time to fight back. Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call 512-430-414-0
[01:18:55.120 --> 01:19:02.120]  and get the information you need to stop the money changers in their tracks.
[01:19:25.120 --> 01:19:34.120]  I was blindsided but now I can see your eyes. You put the fear in my pockets, took the money
[01:19:34.120 --> 01:19:40.120]  from my head. Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:40.120 --> 01:20:01.120]  I ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. I ain't gonna fool me with that same
[01:20:01.120 --> 01:20:02.120]  old trick again.
[01:20:02.120 --> 01:20:09.120]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio 5126461984 is the call-in number.
[01:20:09.120 --> 01:20:14.120]  Alright, we're going to go ahead and finish up with Terry in Michigan. Alright Terry,
[01:20:14.120 --> 01:20:19.120]  now, you got the information there on checking the enrolled bill, which should be what's
[01:20:19.120 --> 01:20:23.120]  in the session law for your legislature, right?
[01:20:23.120 --> 01:20:27.120]  Um, yeah, I'm not exactly sure what you mean by that though.
[01:20:27.120 --> 01:20:35.120]  Okay, the enrolled bill is what should be presented after it's passed both houses
[01:20:35.120 --> 01:20:39.120]  to the governor for his signature.
[01:20:39.120 --> 01:20:46.120]  Then once the governor signs it, it is then and only then an actual law.
[01:20:46.120 --> 01:20:52.120]  Until that time it is just a bill, but because it has made the stage
[01:20:52.120 --> 01:20:59.120]  to the point where it has been passed in its current form by both houses
[01:20:59.120 --> 01:21:03.120]  and sent to the governor, that's called the enrolled bill.
[01:21:03.120 --> 01:21:07.120]  If I've got the terminology correct for that particular stage anyway.
[01:21:07.120 --> 01:21:15.120]  And so what the governor signs is then what becomes written into the session law
[01:21:15.120 --> 01:21:20.120]  as the actual act passed by the legislature.
[01:21:20.120 --> 01:21:27.120]  Now here in Texas there is a committee called the Legislative Drafting Council.
[01:21:27.120 --> 01:21:34.120]  Their job is to take that enrolled bill language that's in the session law
[01:21:34.120 --> 01:21:39.120]  and write it into the individual codes.
[01:21:39.120 --> 01:21:47.120]  And they have to reinterpret the bill in such a way that it's not unconstitutional
[01:21:47.120 --> 01:21:55.120]  or is this supposed to cause any such conflicts with the Constitution or other law.
[01:21:55.120 --> 01:22:00.120]  And so they have to remove any unconstitutional language, reference, construction,
[01:22:00.120 --> 01:22:04.120]  things of that nature before it's actually codified.
[01:22:04.120 --> 01:22:09.120]  Then the courts simply go about what's in the codes when they go out and try cases
[01:22:09.120 --> 01:22:14.120]  rather than what's in the actual session law.
[01:22:14.120 --> 01:22:21.120]  Now the problem with that is the code in certain cases may deviate considerably
[01:22:21.120 --> 01:22:27.120]  from the session law including quite a few things getting lost
[01:22:27.120 --> 01:22:31.120]  in translation about what's what and who it actually applies to.
[01:22:31.120 --> 01:22:37.120]  So when you're researching the history of a law it's very important to go back
[01:22:37.120 --> 01:22:42.120]  to that original bill language to see what it dealt with.
[01:22:42.120 --> 01:22:50.120]  It's also very important to read the preamble which is basically this is an act intended
[01:22:50.120 --> 01:22:52.120]  to do the following.
[01:22:52.120 --> 01:22:58.120]  And it will be a short list or a short excerpt of the things it's intended to do.
[01:22:58.120 --> 01:23:07.120]  For instance, the Driver's License Act back in 1917 here in Texas to make it unlawful
[01:23:07.120 --> 01:23:18.120]  for certain operators of school buses and passenger vehicles or passenger buses
[01:23:18.120 --> 01:23:21.120]  from operating without a license.
[01:23:21.120 --> 01:23:28.120]  That preamble makes it very clear that only operators of school buses
[01:23:28.120 --> 01:23:35.120]  and passenger buses can be charged with operating without a license
[01:23:35.120 --> 01:23:44.120]  because the preamble specifically limited the application of the act to those specific areas.
[01:23:44.120 --> 01:23:52.120]  So no matter what they write in the body they cannot extend the coverage of the body
[01:23:52.120 --> 01:23:55.120]  to something that's not in the preamble.
[01:23:55.120 --> 01:23:58.120]  That's written right into the Texas Constitution.
[01:23:58.120 --> 01:24:04.120]  The preamble must cite all the things the act is intended to affect.
[01:24:04.120 --> 01:24:09.120]  And if it doesn't then the act is either unconstitutional
[01:24:09.120 --> 01:24:15.120]  or it's without force and effect if the provision goes against what's in the preamble.
[01:24:15.120 --> 01:24:17.120]  Do you understand now?
[01:24:17.120 --> 01:24:18.120]  Yeah.
[01:24:18.120 --> 01:24:25.120]  Now if I was to go to my local law library and talk to them and tell them
[01:24:25.120 --> 01:24:31.120]  the best way to describe would say I'm looking for the original session law.
[01:24:31.120 --> 01:24:36.120]  You can try that or you can say I wish to see whatever book contains
[01:24:36.120 --> 01:24:42.120]  the original legislative enactment for this law.
[01:24:42.120 --> 01:24:44.120]  It should be online Terry.
[01:24:44.120 --> 01:24:47.120]  Well the session law may not be ours aren't.
[01:24:47.120 --> 01:24:52.120]  The statutes are but the session law is not.
[01:24:52.120 --> 01:24:58.120]  Yeah I've been looking online a lot and I really haven't been finding much.
[01:24:58.120 --> 01:25:03.120]  One of the things every year I buy the Michigan Penal Code and Motor Vehicle Handbook
[01:25:03.120 --> 01:25:09.120]  for the last four years and I could see just for the last four years
[01:25:09.120 --> 01:25:11.120]  how much it changes every year.
[01:25:11.120 --> 01:25:15.120]  It's like oh this was even close to what the four years ago it said.
[01:25:15.120 --> 01:25:16.120]  Right.
[01:25:16.120 --> 01:25:21.120]  Well see here in Texas one of the other prohibitions against any legislative enactment
[01:25:21.120 --> 01:25:30.120]  is that the legislature cannot alter the subject matter or purpose of an enactment
[01:25:30.120 --> 01:25:40.120]  by amendment or let's see what's the other thing.
[01:25:40.120 --> 01:25:46.120]  Let's see I forget what the other term is but they can't alter the original act
[01:25:46.120 --> 01:25:56.120]  by amending the act or through any type of enactment that's meant to encompass more things.
[01:25:56.120 --> 01:26:03.120]  They can't add to it or amend it in any way that changes its original purpose and effect.
[01:26:03.120 --> 01:26:10.120]  If they want to do that they must repeal the original enactment in its entirety.
[01:26:10.120 --> 01:26:21.120]  They must rewrite it in its entirety and they must republish it if it gets passed in its entirety.
[01:26:21.120 --> 01:26:23.120]  That's written right into our constitution as well.
[01:26:23.120 --> 01:26:28.120]  You cannot alter the original purpose of an act through amendment.
[01:26:28.120 --> 01:26:32.120]  Can't do it.
[01:26:32.120 --> 01:26:34.120]  All right.
[01:26:34.120 --> 01:26:40.120]  And they have to stay so in there that it's been amended.
[01:26:40.120 --> 01:26:44.120]  Anytime they make a change it's an amendment.
[01:26:44.120 --> 01:26:51.120]  If it does not repeal the original act and they change it it's an amendment.
[01:26:51.120 --> 01:26:55.120]  That's all it can be.
[01:26:55.120 --> 01:27:01.120]  And it doesn't matter if the amendment just changes the wording of an existing section
[01:27:01.120 --> 01:27:07.120]  or it adds an entire new section or it repeals a section.
[01:27:07.120 --> 01:27:13.120]  That's amending that statutory enactment.
[01:27:13.120 --> 01:27:22.120]  And if they do anything in those changes that affects something not listed in the preamble
[01:27:22.120 --> 01:27:28.120]  then the act has to be declared unconstitutional or at least that section of it
[01:27:28.120 --> 01:27:33.120]  that creates that conflict has to be declared unconstitutional
[01:27:33.120 --> 01:27:40.120]  because they simply can't do it here in Texas.
[01:27:40.120 --> 01:27:43.120]  Well, that would make sense.
[01:27:43.120 --> 01:27:47.120]  It, you know, like I say, I just, I see so many changes
[01:27:47.120 --> 01:27:51.120]  and I don't see anything in there that says that the original laws change.
[01:27:51.120 --> 01:27:56.120]  It's just, it's different and it's not even marked why or anything.
[01:27:56.120 --> 01:27:59.120]  It's just different.
[01:27:59.120 --> 01:28:04.120]  Yeah, and you'd have to go back to the legislative bill and read whatever discussion
[01:28:04.120 --> 01:28:10.120]  and the journal entries and things like that that say what and why.
[01:28:10.120 --> 01:28:14.120]  Because it's not going to be in the changed statute.
[01:28:14.120 --> 01:28:19.120]  That's only going to be in the legislative journals, in the floor discussions
[01:28:19.120 --> 01:28:25.120]  and the things like that would debate was had on that bill.
[01:28:25.120 --> 01:28:27.120]  Okay. Well, thank you. I appreciate your input.
[01:28:27.120 --> 01:28:29.120]  Yes, sir. You're very welcome. Thanks for calling in.
[01:28:29.120 --> 01:28:31.120]  Thanks, Terry.
[01:28:31.120 --> 01:28:33.120]  Hey.
[01:28:33.120 --> 01:28:35.120]  All right. We got about a minute and a half before we go to break,
[01:28:35.120 --> 01:28:37.120]  but we're going to go ahead with the next caller.
[01:28:37.120 --> 01:28:40.120]  We got Gary from Texas. Roy from New Hampshire is up after that.
[01:28:40.120 --> 01:28:44.120]  Gary, thanks for calling in. What is your question for us tonight?
[01:28:44.120 --> 01:28:51.120]  I've got a little bit, might be a little bit off topic, but it's about taxes
[01:28:51.120 --> 01:28:56.120]  and the corruption that's going on in particularly Travis County
[01:28:56.120 --> 01:29:03.120]  and how they are fleecing the people of this county.
[01:29:03.120 --> 01:29:07.120]  The Praisal District is fleecing the people with their algorithms
[01:29:07.120 --> 01:29:10.120]  and the manner in which they calculate those.
[01:29:10.120 --> 01:29:16.120]  And I'm sure that Deborah is very, very familiar with how algorithms work.
[01:29:16.120 --> 01:29:21.120]  And whenever you go to a protest,
[01:29:21.120 --> 01:29:26.120]  am I right to go ahead and continue speak or should I call in on Wednesday?
[01:29:26.120 --> 01:29:28.120]  Let me ask that question.
[01:29:28.120 --> 01:29:30.120]  You're talking about property taxes, correct?
[01:29:30.120 --> 01:29:32.120]  Yes, I am. I'm at the Laram Texas.
[01:29:32.120 --> 01:29:35.120]  Yeah. It's not specific to the subject tonight,
[01:29:35.120 --> 01:29:37.120]  but that's something I'm familiar with.
[01:29:37.120 --> 01:29:40.120]  So if you'll hang on, Gary, I'll be happy to talk to you a little bit about it.
[01:29:40.120 --> 01:29:42.120]  Okay.
[01:29:42.120 --> 01:29:44.120]  All right. Roy, we'll see you on the board. Please hang in there.
[01:29:44.120 --> 01:29:46.120]  We'll pick you up on the other side of the break.
[01:29:46.120 --> 01:29:51.120]  This is rule of law radio, 512-646-1984.
[01:29:51.120 --> 01:29:52.120]  Is the call in number?
[01:29:52.120 --> 01:29:55.120]  We have a half an hour left in the show, so if you got an issue,
[01:29:55.120 --> 01:29:56.120]  now's the time to call.
[01:29:56.120 --> 01:29:58.120]  Folks, don't wait till the last minute.
[01:29:58.120 --> 01:30:00.120]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.120 --> 01:30:03.120]  Top 10 reasons to question the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing.
[01:30:03.120 --> 01:30:05.120]  Number nine, the extra leg.
[01:30:05.120 --> 01:30:08.120]  Former Oklahoma State medical examiner, Dr. Fred Jordan, had stated,
[01:30:08.120 --> 01:30:12.120]  we had eight people with amputated left legs and nine left legs to account for.
[01:30:12.120 --> 01:30:15.120]  Chief pathologist for Northern Ireland, T. K. Marshall, who performed
[01:30:15.120 --> 01:30:18.120]  over 2,500 autopsies in his time, stated,
[01:30:18.120 --> 01:30:20.120]  there's never been an unknown victim.
[01:30:20.120 --> 01:30:22.120]  This leg belongs to a perpetrator close enough to the bomb
[01:30:22.120 --> 01:30:25.120]  or his body to be damaged, leaving only a left leg behind.
[01:30:25.120 --> 01:30:27.120]  Who was this person?
[01:30:27.120 --> 01:30:30.120]  Please go to okcbombingtruth.com.
[01:30:30.120 --> 01:30:34.120]  When creepy crawlies attack your vegetable garden,
[01:30:34.120 --> 01:30:37.120]  don't reach for toxic sprays and powders.
[01:30:37.120 --> 01:30:39.120]  They can make you and your family sick.
[01:30:39.120 --> 01:30:42.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment
[01:30:42.120 --> 01:30:46.120]  with an inexpensive, safe solution for winning the battle of the bugs.
[01:30:46.120 --> 01:30:48.120]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:48.120 --> 01:30:51.120]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:51.120 --> 01:30:56.120]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:56.120 --> 01:30:58.120]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:58.120 --> 01:31:02.120]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:31:02.120 --> 01:31:04.120]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:31:04.120 --> 01:31:08.120]  This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com.
[01:31:08.120 --> 01:31:12.120]  To drive its search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing,
[01:31:12.120 --> 01:31:15.120]  start over with start page.
[01:31:15.120 --> 01:31:20.120]  Neem, spelled N-E-E-M, is an oil pressed from the fruits and seeds
[01:31:20.120 --> 01:31:22.120]  of an Indian evergreen tree.
[01:31:22.120 --> 01:31:26.120]  It's a natural insecticide that can handle even resistant garden pests.
[01:31:26.120 --> 01:31:28.120]  Neem is not only effective, it's proven safe.
[01:31:28.120 --> 01:31:31.120]  It's been used by the Indian people for thousands of years
[01:31:31.120 --> 01:31:34.120]  to ward off insects and fertilize crops.
[01:31:34.120 --> 01:31:39.120]  You can also use neem tree extracts in traditional medicines, health products, and cooking.
[01:31:39.120 --> 01:31:43.120]  You can make your own neem pesticide by mixing half an ounce of organic neem oil,
[01:31:43.120 --> 01:31:46.120]  half a teaspoon of liquid soap, and two quarts of water.
[01:31:46.120 --> 01:31:50.120]  Spray it on plants and flowers to kill a wide variety of insects,
[01:31:50.120 --> 01:31:53.120]  including ants, aphids, beetles, and caterpillars.
[01:31:53.120 --> 01:31:55.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:55.120 --> 01:31:59.120]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:59.120 --> 01:32:02.120]  Yeah, and who you want to check?
[01:32:02.120 --> 01:32:04.120]  Will you take me for free toilet?
[01:32:04.120 --> 01:32:05.120]  What do you want to check?
[01:32:05.120 --> 01:32:06.120]  Me, not free toilet.
[01:32:06.120 --> 01:32:07.120]  You can check me.
[01:32:07.120 --> 01:32:09.120]  All my sex.
[01:32:09.120 --> 01:32:12.120]  Don't let them check you in the morning, check you in the evening.
[01:32:12.120 --> 01:32:14.120]  Put a check in on your buddy.
[01:32:14.120 --> 01:32:16.120]  And anyway, you go computer reading.
[01:32:16.120 --> 01:32:18.120]  You can hide me safe from nobody.
[01:32:18.120 --> 01:32:19.120]  What me say?
[01:32:19.120 --> 01:32:22.120]  Check check in on your mom, check in on your daddy.
[01:32:22.120 --> 01:32:24.120]  Check in on your grandpa and the granny.
[01:32:24.120 --> 01:32:26.120]  Check in on me, check in on your baby.
[01:32:26.120 --> 01:32:29.120]  Check in on your family, family.
[01:32:29.120 --> 01:32:32.120]  Check in on your dad, and they kept around me.
[01:32:32.120 --> 01:32:34.120]  Check in on the beef, and you still got EEP.
[01:32:34.120 --> 01:32:37.120]  Check in on the fish, them are all in the sea.
[01:32:37.120 --> 01:32:39.120]  Check in on the shark, and the real are around me.
[01:32:39.120 --> 01:32:42.120]  You know, see, man, I'm kind of going to be crazy.
[01:32:42.120 --> 01:32:44.120]  They're the kind of thing, man, they want to be.
[01:32:44.120 --> 01:32:47.120]  Social security, they've got to tell me.
[01:32:47.120 --> 01:32:49.120]  Number of them give me, then repeat after me.
[01:32:49.120 --> 01:32:50.120]  Check in on you in the morning.
[01:32:50.120 --> 01:32:52.120]  Check in on you in the evening.
[01:32:52.120 --> 01:32:54.120]  Check in on you in the daytime.
[01:32:54.120 --> 01:32:56.120]  Hi folks, we are back.
[01:32:56.120 --> 01:32:57.120]  This is rule of law radio.
[01:32:57.120 --> 01:32:59.120]  We have Gary and Roy on the line.
[01:32:59.120 --> 01:33:02.120]  We're going to go ahead and take Gary.
[01:33:02.120 --> 01:33:05.120]  All right, Gary, on the tax issue.
[01:33:05.120 --> 01:33:07.120]  Where exactly were you wanting to go?
[01:33:07.120 --> 01:33:13.120]  Well, whenever you go up to the, have your tax protest
[01:33:13.120 --> 01:33:15.120]  and you get your informal hearing
[01:33:15.120 --> 01:33:17.120]  and you don't like what they have to say
[01:33:17.120 --> 01:33:19.120]  and you go to your formal hearing,
[01:33:19.120 --> 01:33:24.120]  and of course, this is specifically a big conflict of interest.
[01:33:24.120 --> 01:33:27.120]  These people on the arbitration board are, of course,
[01:33:27.120 --> 01:33:30.120]  hired by the Travis County appraisal district,
[01:33:30.120 --> 01:33:32.120]  and this is in every county in Texas.
[01:33:32.120 --> 01:33:34.120]  They're hired by the appraisal district,
[01:33:34.120 --> 01:33:38.120]  and they're shielding himself in a kind of a way
[01:33:38.120 --> 01:33:40.120]  that they've turned these appraisal districts
[01:33:40.120 --> 01:33:46.120]  into corporations because it would be against the law
[01:33:46.120 --> 01:33:52.120]  to over-evaluate a piece of property for taxing purposes.
[01:33:52.120 --> 01:33:54.120]  So they're shielding themselves in a way
[01:33:54.120 --> 01:33:58.120]  that they've made this corporation,
[01:33:58.120 --> 01:34:04.120]  they've made the corporation as a form of shield
[01:34:04.120 --> 01:34:08.120]  to the county tax assessor.
[01:34:08.120 --> 01:34:11.120]  Let me put a bug in here in case you don't know this.
[01:34:11.120 --> 01:34:16.120]  You do understand the Texas Constitution specifically prohibits
[01:34:16.120 --> 01:34:24.120]  the state from having any form of ad valorem taxation here in Texas.
[01:34:24.120 --> 01:34:26.120]  Okay.
[01:34:26.120 --> 01:34:30.120]  If you search the state constitution for ad valorem,
[01:34:30.120 --> 01:34:32.120]  you will find the reference that shows you
[01:34:32.120 --> 01:34:36.120]  that they are prohibited in Texas.
[01:34:36.120 --> 01:34:39.120]  Now, here's the problem this creates.
[01:34:39.120 --> 01:34:46.120]  If the state is prohibited the power to levy an ad valorem tax,
[01:34:46.120 --> 01:34:50.120]  which we know they were because the state supreme court ruled
[01:34:50.120 --> 01:34:56.120]  back in the 90s that the school tax was an illegal ad valorem tax
[01:34:56.120 --> 01:35:02.120]  in violation of the Texas Constitution because the state managed it.
[01:35:02.120 --> 01:35:07.120]  If the state does not have the authority to create an ad valorem tax,
[01:35:07.120 --> 01:35:13.120]  how can the legislature of the state bequeath that authority
[01:35:13.120 --> 01:35:18.120]  to the local political subdivisions?
[01:35:18.120 --> 01:35:25.120]  You cannot give or grant a power you do not possess.
[01:35:25.120 --> 01:35:30.120]  If the state doesn't possess the power because it's constitutionally forbidden,
[01:35:30.120 --> 01:35:41.120]  they cannot just by common sense alone give it to somebody else.
[01:35:41.120 --> 01:35:44.120]  I was not aware of that.
[01:35:44.120 --> 01:35:45.120]  Well, yeah.
[01:35:45.120 --> 01:35:51.120]  I mean, if the Texas Constitution doesn't grant authority to the counties
[01:35:51.120 --> 01:35:56.120]  or the county appraisal districts to levy these kinds of ad valorem taxes either,
[01:35:56.120 --> 01:35:58.120]  then where are they getting that authority from?
[01:35:58.120 --> 01:35:59.120]  They're just making it up.
[01:35:59.120 --> 01:36:02.120]  That doesn't count.
[01:36:02.120 --> 01:36:04.120]  That's not good enough.
[01:36:04.120 --> 01:36:06.120]  Well, how do you go about fighting that?
[01:36:06.120 --> 01:36:08.120]  Well, you would have to take it into court.
[01:36:08.120 --> 01:36:10.120]  You'd have to follow lawsuits.
[01:36:10.120 --> 01:36:15.120]  And before you can fight against these property taxes,
[01:36:15.120 --> 01:36:19.120]  you have to go through all the administrative procedure first.
[01:36:19.120 --> 01:36:22.120]  And that's just a standard tenet of law.
[01:36:22.120 --> 01:36:27.120]  You have to exhaust all administrative remedies before you turn to the courts
[01:36:27.120 --> 01:36:30.120]  for any remedy, especially remedies and equity.
[01:36:30.120 --> 01:36:31.120]  Yeah.
[01:36:31.120 --> 01:36:33.120]  Now, there is one other thing to be aware of,
[01:36:33.120 --> 01:36:36.120]  and I don't recall exactly where it is in the tax code,
[01:36:36.120 --> 01:36:38.120]  but I know I've seen it.
[01:36:38.120 --> 01:36:46.120]  The tax code specifically states that in order to tax a piece of property,
[01:36:46.120 --> 01:36:54.120]  there must be a signed assessment by someone authorized to make that assessment.
[01:36:54.120 --> 01:37:00.120]  That assessment, assessment must be on the tail end
[01:37:00.120 --> 01:37:06.120]  of a personal physical inspection of the property.
[01:37:06.120 --> 01:37:10.120]  They must inspect it inside and out,
[01:37:10.120 --> 01:37:15.120]  and they must verify the amount of the tax they're trying to levy
[01:37:15.120 --> 01:37:20.120]  by signing that assessment.
[01:37:20.120 --> 01:37:27.120]  There will be no signed assessment on file with anybody
[01:37:27.120 --> 01:37:32.120]  in relation to that tax bill that they sent you.
[01:37:32.120 --> 01:37:33.120]  Okay.
[01:37:33.120 --> 01:37:36.120]  I went out and hired a professional to do a...
[01:37:36.120 --> 01:37:38.120]  A professional what?
[01:37:38.120 --> 01:37:44.120]  A professional not associated appraiser to do an appraisal on my property.
[01:37:44.120 --> 01:37:47.120]  They came up with one figure,
[01:37:47.120 --> 01:37:52.120]  and the figure that the county has is considerably higher.
[01:37:52.120 --> 01:37:53.120]  Always.
[01:37:53.120 --> 01:37:57.120]  They can't steal money if they tax you or if they assess you low,
[01:37:57.120 --> 01:38:03.120]  but the problem is there's not an assessment, okay,
[01:38:03.120 --> 01:38:10.120]  till there is a signed assessment by someone that is willing to take responsibility
[01:38:10.120 --> 01:38:16.120]  for putting the number on the paper as to what they say your property is worth.
[01:38:16.120 --> 01:38:19.120]  It's not a valid assessment.
[01:38:19.120 --> 01:38:25.120]  That's exactly why the tax code requires it to be signed
[01:38:25.120 --> 01:38:31.120]  so that you can protest it and show that somebody is trying to defraud you
[01:38:31.120 --> 01:38:38.120]  by increasing the property values for the purpose of getting extra tax money.
[01:38:38.120 --> 01:38:45.120]  Nobody wants to go to jail for fraud and tampering with a government record
[01:38:45.120 --> 01:38:54.120]  because there are no signed assessments by anybody in the taxing authority.
[01:38:54.120 --> 01:39:03.120]  Well, I sure do pay a whole lot of taxes for them since they violate the law like that.
[01:39:03.120 --> 01:39:07.120]  Well, until you somebody that actually has standing,
[01:39:07.120 --> 01:39:14.120]  and that's going to only be somebody that owns property that they've been told they owe a tax on,
[01:39:14.120 --> 01:39:19.120]  that's the person or persons that are going to have to take this to court
[01:39:19.120 --> 01:39:22.120]  and make an example out of these guys.
[01:39:22.120 --> 01:39:28.120]  Okay. I'd like to talk to you off air about how to do that.
[01:39:28.120 --> 01:39:35.120]  Well, I can talk to you about it, but I don't know how much time I can dedicate to it.
[01:39:35.120 --> 01:39:41.120]  I've got a whole lot of irons in the fire and blisters on my fingers from trying to keep them all moving.
[01:39:41.120 --> 01:39:45.120]  Okay. So I don't know just how many more I can take on.
[01:39:45.120 --> 01:39:49.120]  This is an area of research I've done up to a point.
[01:39:49.120 --> 01:39:55.120]  I know that it's out there and I know that there's a lot of things I don't have that would be very beneficial.
[01:39:55.120 --> 01:40:01.120]  If I could do the same thing with the tax code in relation to property taxes that I've done with the rest of this stuff,
[01:40:01.120 --> 01:40:06.120]  I could be of more help to you, but I just have not had the time and resources for that.
[01:40:06.120 --> 01:40:15.120]  Okay. But I would certainly not object to you taking on that project on your own and becoming the expert in that area.
[01:40:15.120 --> 01:40:21.120]  Well, somebody needs to do it because everybody in this county, I mean, the way that they're doing it,
[01:40:21.120 --> 01:40:27.120]  these, these, believe me, it's everybody in every county.
[01:40:27.120 --> 01:40:34.120]  I know. I do know that and I do know that firsthand now.
[01:40:34.120 --> 01:40:38.120]  I am under pressure also.
[01:40:38.120 --> 01:40:45.120]  And I thought I'm ready to take them off.
[01:40:45.120 --> 01:40:49.120]  Pretty simple. I just need to know where to get started.
[01:40:49.120 --> 01:40:53.120]  Well, probably the best place to get started is read the property tax code.
[01:40:53.120 --> 01:40:54.120]  Okay.
[01:40:54.120 --> 01:40:59.120]  Read the, read the Texas property tax code and that will, that will be a very good place to start.
[01:40:59.120 --> 01:41:05.120]  And it'll tell you how the tools that you need to have in place in order to file a lawsuit.
[01:41:05.120 --> 01:41:09.120]  Because like I said, you have to go through all the administrative process first,
[01:41:09.120 --> 01:41:14.120]  which means the informal hearing, then the formal hearing, and then you have a certain number of days.
[01:41:14.120 --> 01:41:17.120]  I can't remember if it's 30 or 60 or 90.
[01:41:17.120 --> 01:41:24.120]  You have a certain number of days to file a lawsuit in the district court in the state in order to protest.
[01:41:24.120 --> 01:41:26.120]  And there may be other causes of action too.
[01:41:26.120 --> 01:41:32.120]  I mean, if you can prove fraud, that's another cause of action.
[01:41:32.120 --> 01:41:33.120]  Yeah.
[01:41:33.120 --> 01:41:40.120]  And in the entire time that I owned my computer business, my county would send me a tax bill
[01:41:40.120 --> 01:41:44.120]  and I would immediately send it right back with a letter,
[01:41:44.120 --> 01:41:53.120]  certified mail return receipt requested stating that if and when you can provide me with a signed assessment
[01:41:53.120 --> 01:42:01.120]  by the individual that personally inspected this property for this value,
[01:42:01.120 --> 01:42:06.120]  then will I even consider paying this tax.
[01:42:06.120 --> 01:42:12.120]  Otherwise, don't set foot on my property.
[01:42:12.120 --> 01:42:15.120]  And they never showed up.
[01:42:15.120 --> 01:42:19.120]  Now this was, I ran my computer business for years.
[01:42:19.120 --> 01:42:23.120]  The state, through the sales tax that tried to come in and shut me down,
[01:42:23.120 --> 01:42:29.120]  but the county tax assessor, I would not and never have paid a penny to.
[01:42:29.120 --> 01:42:31.120]  Okay.
[01:42:31.120 --> 01:42:36.120]  And every time I got a tax bill, that's exactly what I sent back to them.
[01:42:36.120 --> 01:42:39.120]  Now ripping off a lot of people in this county.
[01:42:39.120 --> 01:42:40.120]  Yeah.
[01:42:40.120 --> 01:42:43.120]  Now, Don Beckham is giving me some information here.
[01:42:43.120 --> 01:42:49.120]  Article eight of the Texas Constitution section one e abolition or abolition, excuse me,
[01:42:49.120 --> 01:42:51.120]  of ad valorem property taxes.
[01:42:51.120 --> 01:42:58.120]  No state ad valorem taxes shall be levied upon any property within this state.
[01:42:58.120 --> 01:42:59.120]  Okay.
[01:42:59.120 --> 01:43:09.120]  That was added in 1968 and it was amended in 82 and 2001.
[01:43:09.120 --> 01:43:11.120]  Okay.
[01:43:11.120 --> 01:43:15.120]  But that is the constitutional provision that prohibits the state from creating any
[01:43:15.120 --> 01:43:17.120]  ad valorem taxes.
[01:43:17.120 --> 01:43:22.120]  If they can't create them, they can't give anybody else the power to do it either.
[01:43:22.120 --> 01:43:27.120]  This leads me to the argument that I have made ever since I studied this issue.
[01:43:27.120 --> 01:43:36.120]  The only property that anybody can tax without their consent is the property of
[01:43:36.120 --> 01:43:43.120]  corporations because they are created by and subject to the rules and regulations
[01:43:43.120 --> 01:43:49.120]  of the state and the political subdivision in which they operate.
[01:43:49.120 --> 01:43:50.120]  Okay.
[01:43:50.120 --> 01:43:51.120]  Hang on a second Gary.
[01:43:51.120 --> 01:43:52.120]  We'll finish you up on the other side.
[01:43:52.120 --> 01:43:56.120]  This is rule of law radio 512646 1984.
[01:43:56.120 --> 01:43:57.120]  We'll see you.
[01:43:57.120 --> 01:43:58.120]  We'll get you on the other side.
[01:43:58.120 --> 01:44:00.120]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.120 --> 01:44:07.120]  Okay.
[01:44:30.120 --> 01:44:58.120]  Thank you.
[01:45:01.120 --> 01:45:06.120]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:06.120 --> 01:45:09.120]  Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary.
[01:45:09.120 --> 01:45:16.120]  The affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours
[01:45:16.120 --> 01:45:17.120]  step by step.
[01:45:17.120 --> 01:45:21.120]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:21.120 --> 01:45:25.120]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:25.120 --> 01:45:30.120]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[01:45:30.120 --> 01:45:36.120]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:36.120 --> 01:45:41.120]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[01:45:41.120 --> 01:45:45.120]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:45.120 --> 01:45:51.120]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:51.120 --> 01:45:55.120]  pro se tactics and much more.
[01:45:55.120 --> 01:46:15.120]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:15.120 --> 01:46:18.120]  Hi folks, we are back rule of law radio.
[01:46:18.120 --> 01:46:21.120]  We are in our last segment here on the show for tonight.
[01:46:21.120 --> 01:46:25.120]  We're going to finish up with Gary and then we're going to get to Roy and Steve and hopefully
[01:46:25.120 --> 01:46:28.120]  get both of them wrapped up before we run out of time.
[01:46:28.120 --> 01:46:31.120]  All right, Gary, anything else on this subject?
[01:46:31.120 --> 01:46:36.120]  No, except that I'm going to take them on and I am within all those timeframes and it
[01:46:36.120 --> 01:46:44.120]  is 60 days and I've gone through the informal, gone through the formal and they sent me a
[01:46:44.120 --> 01:46:50.120]  big letter with, of course, they want you to read this letter and go into binding arbitration.
[01:46:50.120 --> 01:46:57.120]  Why would you go through binding arbitration when they're hiring the arbitrator?
[01:46:57.120 --> 01:47:00.120]  Yeah, no, conflict of interest.
[01:47:00.120 --> 01:47:03.120]  Yeah, in civil cases, the arbitration is optional.
[01:47:03.120 --> 01:47:05.120]  You just say no.
[01:47:05.120 --> 01:47:09.120]  Well, they have a little bit of paragraph down there saying you can take me to court.
[01:47:09.120 --> 01:47:14.120]  Yeah, well, that's why I'm saying you got to read the code, you have to read the law.
[01:47:14.120 --> 01:47:18.120]  I will read the law and get familiar with it and probably call you back.
[01:47:18.120 --> 01:47:21.120]  All right, Gary, thank you for all the information.
[01:47:21.120 --> 01:47:23.120]  Okay, thanks Gary.
[01:47:23.120 --> 01:47:27.120]  Okay, we're going to go to Roy in New Hampshire.
[01:47:27.120 --> 01:47:29.120]  Evening Roy, what can we do for you?
[01:47:29.120 --> 01:47:31.120]  Hello, can you hear me okay?
[01:47:31.120 --> 01:47:32.120]  Yes sir.
[01:47:32.120 --> 01:47:41.120]  Okay, I'm in New Hampshire, I'm licensed and registered here.
[01:47:41.120 --> 01:47:47.120]  Licensed and registered for what?
[01:47:47.120 --> 01:47:50.120]  Operated and motivated.
[01:47:50.120 --> 01:47:52.120]  So you're a commercial driver?
[01:47:52.120 --> 01:47:54.120]  No, I'm not.
[01:47:54.120 --> 01:48:03.120]  But the free status who have taken that course of action here, they've done some time in jail.
[01:48:03.120 --> 01:48:05.120]  So it's not working out too good.
[01:48:05.120 --> 01:48:08.120]  That tact isn't working out too good up here.
[01:48:08.120 --> 01:48:10.120]  But the question I have is about inspection stickers.
[01:48:10.120 --> 01:48:15.120]  I had an automated inspection sticker and I finally got stopped for it.
[01:48:15.120 --> 01:48:24.120]  And I got to find and I heard something about inspection stickers actually being from the federal level.
[01:48:24.120 --> 01:48:26.120]  I don't know if this is true.
[01:48:26.120 --> 01:48:28.120]  It's all at the federal level.
[01:48:28.120 --> 01:48:40.120]  But you have to study the statutes in your state to ensure that you can tie them in to the federal rules and regulations so you can make that argument.
[01:48:40.120 --> 01:48:51.120]  Now, as far as the people not turning out too good in their cases up there, I can't say the why of that because I don't know what they're arguing.
[01:48:51.120 --> 01:48:53.120]  Yeah, I don't believe it really.
[01:48:53.120 --> 01:48:59.120]  Yeah, your state statutes are going to deal with all of those subjects.
[01:48:59.120 --> 01:49:09.120]  If you're not studying your state statute to learn how it actually applies and what it actually says and how it came into existence in the first place,
[01:49:09.120 --> 01:49:13.120]  you're not doing due diligence before you try to get out from under.
[01:49:13.120 --> 01:49:19.120]  In which case, just go ahead and take your wallet out of your pocket and hand it over every week.
[01:49:19.120 --> 01:49:21.120]  All right.
[01:49:21.120 --> 01:49:33.120]  How about if you do take that course of action and, you know, don't go through the life of this thing and I guess her distraction procedure.
[01:49:33.120 --> 01:49:36.120]  But you're near another state that you go into often.
[01:49:36.120 --> 01:49:40.120]  I mean, you're down there in Austin and you got a long way to go before you get to another state.
[01:49:40.120 --> 01:49:42.120]  I don't know how you people handle that down there.
[01:49:42.120 --> 01:49:49.120]  Well, where I'm actually from over in East Texas, I've only got 40 minutes before I go into Louisiana.
[01:49:49.120 --> 01:49:53.120]  And I would go over there all the time when I'm home.
[01:49:53.120 --> 01:49:54.120]  Right.
[01:49:54.120 --> 01:49:55.120]  With your what?
[01:49:55.120 --> 01:49:56.120]  With my car.
[01:49:56.120 --> 01:49:59.120]  And my car has no state plates.
[01:49:59.120 --> 01:50:00.120]  It's got no stickers.
[01:50:00.120 --> 01:50:01.120]  It has none of that.
[01:50:01.120 --> 01:50:02.120]  Right.
[01:50:02.120 --> 01:50:05.120]  Well, you've got your own homemade plate on it, don't you?
[01:50:05.120 --> 01:50:06.120]  Yes.
[01:50:06.120 --> 01:50:11.120]  I've got a handmade plate that says private vehicle.
[01:50:11.120 --> 01:50:13.120]  Right.
[01:50:13.120 --> 01:50:17.120]  Okay.
[01:50:17.120 --> 01:50:18.120]  Okay.
[01:50:18.120 --> 01:50:25.120]  So anyway, for the time being, just, I was just wondering where inspections are at.
[01:50:25.120 --> 01:50:30.120]  But basically, you've got to see where they fished it into the state statutes.
[01:50:30.120 --> 01:50:31.120]  Correct.
[01:50:31.120 --> 01:50:34.120]  And you need to track that in action.
[01:50:34.120 --> 01:50:45.120]  And track that enactment all the way back to its very origination to find out why it was created in the first place and what it actually applies to.
[01:50:45.120 --> 01:50:46.120]  Right.
[01:50:46.120 --> 01:50:50.120]  You may go all the way back to the early 1900s before you find that answer.
[01:50:50.120 --> 01:50:52.120]  It's probably commercial drivers, right?
[01:50:52.120 --> 01:50:55.120]  Well, I can almost guarantee you it's going to be commercial drivers.
[01:50:55.120 --> 01:50:56.120]  Yeah.
[01:50:56.120 --> 01:51:00.120]  Now, why doesn't Minnesota have a inspection?
[01:51:00.120 --> 01:51:03.120]  I've never lived in Minnesota, so I can't answer that.
[01:51:03.120 --> 01:51:04.120]  Right.
[01:51:04.120 --> 01:51:05.120]  But they don't have one.
[01:51:05.120 --> 01:51:07.120]  They don't have inspection out there, vehicle inspection.
[01:51:07.120 --> 01:51:19.120]  Well, every state can pick and choose what part of the federal law it implements if they're willing to not take a certain part of the alleged federal funding that they get bribed with to do it.
[01:51:19.120 --> 01:51:33.120]  Almost every state implemented their current form of a DMV motor vehicle or transportation code based upon federal bribery to implement the federal laws at the state level.
[01:51:33.120 --> 01:51:37.120]  That's exactly what the tie-in argument is.
[01:51:37.120 --> 01:51:38.120]  Right.
[01:51:38.120 --> 01:51:43.120]  But you have to find the enactment that proves it, which I've done that.
[01:51:43.120 --> 01:51:50.120]  In 1994, I moved here, and there was no emissions.
[01:51:50.120 --> 01:51:56.120]  There was state inspection, but there was no emissions until well after 2000.
[01:51:56.120 --> 01:52:07.120]  And all I heard is that there was no emissions in the inspection, which is what I failed, because the state of New Hampshire had a lawsuit against the EPA.
[01:52:07.120 --> 01:52:14.120]  I don't know if that was a bug in particular, but it might be interesting to find out.
[01:52:14.120 --> 01:52:16.120]  Okay.
[01:52:16.120 --> 01:52:18.120]  Anyway, that's all.
[01:52:18.120 --> 01:52:19.120]  All right.
[01:52:19.120 --> 01:52:20.120]  Thanks, Roy.
[01:52:20.120 --> 01:52:21.120]  All in, Roy.
[01:52:21.120 --> 01:52:22.120]  Thank you very much.
[01:52:22.120 --> 01:52:23.120]  Okay.
[01:52:23.120 --> 01:52:24.120]  Have a good night.
[01:52:24.120 --> 01:52:25.120]  Okay.
[01:52:25.120 --> 01:52:30.120]  Before we go to Stephen or to Steve, real quick, back on the tax issue, some more information I've just received.
[01:52:30.120 --> 01:52:37.120]  Take a look at tax code section 41.45C, as in Charlie.
[01:52:37.120 --> 01:52:45.120]  It states, the chief appraiser shall appear at each protest hearing before the appraisal review board to represent the appraisal office.
[01:52:45.120 --> 01:52:51.120]  I've been to a couple of these, as has Don Beckham, who provided me with this information.
[01:52:51.120 --> 01:52:54.120]  The chief appraiser never shows up.
[01:52:54.120 --> 01:52:59.120]  He attempts to delegate this task to one of his underlings.
[01:52:59.120 --> 01:53:02.120]  The law does not allow him to delegate it.
[01:53:02.120 --> 01:53:09.120]  That makes that hearing absolutely illegal and of no force and effect.
[01:53:09.120 --> 01:53:11.120]  Keep that in mind.
[01:53:11.120 --> 01:53:12.120]  Bring that up.
[01:53:12.120 --> 01:53:14.120]  Put it in your lawsuit.
[01:53:14.120 --> 01:53:28.120]  Also, do not forget to sue the appraisal review board and the appraisal district and the individuals therein in their individual capacities under those offices.
[01:53:28.120 --> 01:53:30.120]  Okay?
[01:53:30.120 --> 01:53:33.120]  Sue them all or it will get dismissed.
[01:53:33.120 --> 01:53:34.120]  Okay.
[01:53:34.120 --> 01:53:36.120]  Let's go ahead and take Steve in Florida.
[01:53:36.120 --> 01:53:38.120]  Steve, what can we do for you?
[01:53:38.120 --> 01:53:39.120]  Hey, Eddie.
[01:53:39.120 --> 01:53:42.120]  Well, I have a little information for you on your property tax situation here in Florida.
[01:53:42.120 --> 01:53:48.120]  I've had some pretty good luck of shanghaiing the property appraisals and taking the properties off the tax rolls.
[01:53:48.120 --> 01:53:53.120]  We have some really good law in our constitution that states that even though you might not like this word,
[01:53:53.120 --> 01:53:58.120]  the permanent residence of the owner shall be exempt from all taxation thereon, household goods and personal effects,
[01:53:58.120 --> 01:54:04.120]  and the administrative code is defined as food, clothing, and shelter, and is to be exempt from the tax rolls.
[01:54:04.120 --> 01:54:11.120]  Now, the point is that they also say in their statutes too that the property has to be practicing a taxable privilege.
[01:54:11.120 --> 01:54:16.120]  And of course, when you look up the definition of Avalorum in the Blackfault dictionary,
[01:54:16.120 --> 01:54:20.120]  it says a tax on an article or property in commerce.
[01:54:20.120 --> 01:54:21.120]  Exactly.
[01:54:21.120 --> 01:54:27.120]  What 747s are you building in your home and how many hamburgers are you serving out of your home?
[01:54:27.120 --> 01:54:34.120]  Well, but that does not necessarily mean you cannot be conducting a business out of your home
[01:54:34.120 --> 01:54:37.120]  or using your property to conduct a business.
[01:54:37.120 --> 01:54:44.120]  The business must be one that is one incorporated and two, regulatable by the state.
[01:54:44.120 --> 01:54:49.120]  That means you have a business license, yes, chartered through the state.
[01:54:49.120 --> 01:54:52.120]  Okay, that is a must.
[01:54:52.120 --> 01:55:00.120]  If those two things don't exist, the fact that you operate a business in order to make a living for you and your family
[01:55:00.120 --> 01:55:04.120]  does not constitute commercial activity they can tax.
[01:55:04.120 --> 01:55:05.120]  I agree.
[01:55:05.120 --> 01:55:06.120]  You have the right to private business.
[01:55:06.120 --> 01:55:11.120]  So if you're giving piano lessons out of your home, they can't put your property on the tax roll for that.
[01:55:11.120 --> 01:55:16.120]  But the point I was making is you'll find out that when you really stare into your code, you will find the exemptions
[01:55:16.120 --> 01:55:20.120]  and you will find that the property appraiser is not, has no authority to be conducting an avalarm tax
[01:55:20.120 --> 01:55:24.120]  on a piece of private property used strictly as a dwelling unit.
[01:55:24.120 --> 01:55:25.120]  Well, I'm not sorry.
[01:55:25.120 --> 01:55:26.120]  I hate that word.
[01:55:26.120 --> 01:55:29.120]  Dwelling units, what they use, two tax department complexes and things,
[01:55:29.120 --> 01:55:32.120]  but a private dwelling is probably the correct word used for that, I guess.
[01:55:32.120 --> 01:55:35.120]  No, a domicile is the correct word.
[01:55:35.120 --> 01:55:38.120]  Well, you see that I've had problems with that because here in the Florida tax code,
[01:55:38.120 --> 01:55:41.120]  domiciles brought up in the tax code of stuff that they're able to wiggle.
[01:55:41.120 --> 01:55:43.120]  So I don't even like the word domicile.
[01:55:43.120 --> 01:55:47.120]  And from reading the Black Fault Dictionary to like a page and a half of a definition that kind of scares me
[01:55:47.120 --> 01:55:50.120]  of even using the word domicile, especially here in this state.
[01:55:50.120 --> 01:55:52.120]  But that's something we have to wiggle on.
[01:55:52.120 --> 01:55:56.120]  The point I'm making is I can prove beyond shadow of doubt that Florida's property appraiser
[01:55:56.120 --> 01:55:59.120]  are falsifying records for a financial gain.
[01:55:59.120 --> 01:56:02.120]  And I believe you can take it to federal court just over a Fifth Amendment right violation.
[01:56:02.120 --> 01:56:05.120]  You mean to tell me I have the right on the Fifth Amendment owned property as long as I can pay
[01:56:05.120 --> 01:56:10.120]  a for-profit municipal corporation extortion fees and then to get the assessment.
[01:56:10.120 --> 01:56:13.120]  Here in Florida, they send unsigned, unverified assessments.
[01:56:13.120 --> 01:56:16.120]  And on the back, it's a threat that if you don't pay this tax, you might lose your property.
[01:56:16.120 --> 01:56:21.120]  So now I see mail fraud and extortion through mail through Title 18, 1341.
[01:56:21.120 --> 01:56:29.120]  Well, it would only become mail fraud if you relied upon that information under fear of loss of anything
[01:56:29.120 --> 01:56:31.120]  and paid them.
[01:56:31.120 --> 01:56:33.120]  That's the only time it will become extortion.
[01:56:33.120 --> 01:56:38.120]  How many people do you think are paying property taxes on their home because they want to?
[01:56:38.120 --> 01:56:41.120]  Well, I don't live in Florida.
[01:56:41.120 --> 01:56:45.120]  Well, they're doing it because they're in fear that they may lose their home or properties.
[01:56:45.120 --> 01:56:47.120]  They don't pay this extortion fee or protection fee.
[01:56:47.120 --> 01:56:52.120]  Well, but they're also not protesting it by sending back something to make the record.
[01:56:52.120 --> 01:56:58.120]  Send back a certified mail return receipt requested, a notarized instrument that states,
[01:56:58.120 --> 01:57:05.120]  and you might be in danger of losing your liberty for fraud and extortion if you proceed against
[01:57:05.120 --> 01:57:08.120]  my private property in this manner.
[01:57:08.120 --> 01:57:09.120]  I like that.
[01:57:09.120 --> 01:57:13.120]  I've used the public records request asking them where is the law, the constitutional provision,
[01:57:13.120 --> 01:57:17.120]  statutory provision they're relying on, to levy an Avalorum tax on a piece of private property
[01:57:17.120 --> 01:57:19.120]  used for non-commercial purposes.
[01:57:19.120 --> 01:57:20.120]  Never got an answer.
[01:57:20.120 --> 01:57:22.120]  They can't seem to show me the law that allows them to do it.
[01:57:22.120 --> 01:57:24.120]  I can't even find a procedure to levy.
[01:57:24.120 --> 01:57:25.120]  They do no foreclosures.
[01:57:25.120 --> 01:57:27.120]  They just do a tax deed sell.
[01:57:27.120 --> 01:57:31.120]  The next thing you need is some hillbilly banging on your door claim and they bought your property from the county.
[01:57:31.120 --> 01:57:35.120]  The county never even owned the property before they conduct the tax sell.
[01:57:35.120 --> 01:57:37.120]  So how do you sell property you don't own?
[01:57:37.120 --> 01:57:38.120]  Yeah.
[01:57:38.120 --> 01:57:43.120]  Steve, by chance, do you have anything that you do in Florida like what we're doing here
[01:57:43.120 --> 01:57:48.120]  that the public can listen to or a show or a website or anything like that?
[01:57:48.120 --> 01:57:49.120]  No, sir.
[01:57:49.120 --> 01:57:53.120]  I just sit here in my little law room and put the stuff together on my own and try to help my neighbors and friends.
[01:57:53.120 --> 01:57:54.120]  We talked this afternoon.
[01:57:54.120 --> 01:57:55.120]  I called you.
[01:57:55.120 --> 01:57:56.120]  Great.
[01:57:56.120 --> 01:57:57.120]  I got a Florida clone.
[01:57:57.120 --> 01:58:04.120]  If you know any of the Florida clones, I sure love to meet one because I'm the only guy here that I know that's kind of playing the stuff here.
[01:58:04.120 --> 01:58:06.120]  Steve, just hang in there.
[01:58:06.120 --> 01:58:16.120]  Like I was saying earlier in the show, we finally got a webmaster guru who's going to give us a 90% discount on a really, really good website that's going to be a social networking website.
[01:58:16.120 --> 01:58:21.120]  So you'll be able to social network with other guru clones.
[01:58:21.120 --> 01:58:23.120]  I appreciate you guys.
[01:58:23.120 --> 01:58:24.120]  All right.
[01:58:24.120 --> 01:58:25.120]  And I'll talk to you all next time.
[01:58:25.120 --> 01:58:26.120]  Thanks, Steve.
[01:58:26.120 --> 01:58:27.120]  All right.
[01:58:27.120 --> 01:58:33.120]  And folks, please go to willoflawradio.com and contribute to the chip-in so that we can try to take things to the next level.
[01:58:33.120 --> 01:58:39.120]  There's a lot of hosts I'd like to bring on the air, really, really good people, but I have to be able to hire a staff.
[01:58:39.120 --> 01:58:43.120]  I can't produce all these shows and, you know, fight all these battles myself.
[01:58:43.120 --> 01:58:45.120]  You've got to pay for the infrastructure.
[01:58:45.120 --> 01:58:55.120]  So, folks, please contribute to the chip-in so we can get a new website so that we can start advertising, marketing, promoting, getting more streams and getting some sponsors so that we can make this thing successful.
[01:58:55.120 --> 01:58:56.120]  Together.
[01:58:56.120 --> 01:59:25.120]  God bless and good night.
[01:59:26.120 --> 01:59:28.120]  Thank you.
[01:59:56.120 --> 01:59:58.120]  Thank you.