ROL_2011-06-27_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:04.520]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[00:04.520 --> 00:09.840]  Two hundred Syrian opposition figures gathered in the capital Damascus Monday to discuss strategies
[00:09.840 --> 00:13.200]  for a peaceful transition to democracy.
[00:13.200 --> 00:18.080]  Participants say the meeting was unprecedented in five decades of the Barth Party's monopoly.
[00:18.080 --> 00:22.200]  The government hailed the gathering as an example of reform, but activists dismissed
[00:22.200 --> 00:26.960]  it as a publicity stunt because of the absence of banned groups, adding the meeting merely
[00:26.960 --> 00:33.040]  legitimized the regime as its crackdown on protesters continued.
[00:33.040 --> 00:37.720]  The International Criminal Court Monday issued an arrest warrant for Libyan leader Mamar
[00:37.720 --> 00:43.280]  Qaddafi and his son Saif al-Islam on charges of crimes against humanity.
[00:43.280 --> 00:48.120]  An Amnesty International investigation Friday found no evidence of mass killings or rape
[00:48.120 --> 00:54.160]  by Qaddafi's forces, casting doubt on the allegations which prompted the ICC investigation
[00:54.160 --> 00:58.360]  and which were used to justify NATO's military campaign in Libya.
[00:58.360 --> 01:04.160]  A woman has filed a complaint with the Department of Homeland Security after transportation
[01:04.160 --> 01:09.440]  security administration officials asked her wheelchair-bound mother in the final stages
[01:09.440 --> 01:14.600]  of leukemia to remove an adult diaper during a pat-down search last weekend.
[01:14.600 --> 01:19.680]  Gene Webber said, here is my mother, ninety-five years old, barely able to stand, and then
[01:19.680 --> 01:25.080]  this is something I couldn't imagine happening on American soil.
[01:25.080 --> 01:29.400]  The U.S. military spends twenty billion dollars a year on air conditioning its troops in
[01:29.400 --> 01:31.280]  Iraq and Afghanistan.
[01:31.280 --> 01:36.640]  An air conditioning unit at a remote Afghanistan outpost has to be shipped into Karachi, then
[01:36.640 --> 01:41.920]  driven eight hundred miles over eighteen days to the warren, torn country on atrociously
[01:41.920 --> 01:42.920]  bad roads.
[01:42.920 --> 01:49.200]  Stephen Anderson, a retired brigadier general who served as General Petraeus' chief logistician
[01:49.200 --> 01:54.640]  in Iraq, said more than one thousand troops have died while delivering vital supplies.
[01:54.640 --> 01:59.200]  Anderson added the military could save bushels of money by going green.
[01:59.200 --> 02:04.840]  The U.S. boat taking part in an aid flotilla to the besieged Gaza Strip was prevented from
[02:04.840 --> 02:09.960]  departing Athens last week by Greek officials who cited an anonymous complaint.
[02:09.960 --> 02:13.120]  The boat, the audacity of hope, was unseaworthy.
[02:13.120 --> 02:17.880]  The Jerusalem Post revealed Sunday that the complaint had been lodged by Shorat Hadeen,
[02:17.880 --> 02:19.320]  the Israel Law Center.
[02:19.320 --> 02:24.760]  The Law Center also sent letters to 36 U.S. citizens planning to sail in the flotilla,
[02:24.760 --> 02:27.240]  warning them they could be violating U.S. law.
[02:27.240 --> 02:31.920]  Former State Department official and key organizer of the humanitarian mission, Colonel Anne
[02:31.920 --> 02:37.480]  Wright, said, we reiterated the boat was surveyed by a professional surveyor and successfully
[02:37.480 --> 02:39.480]  completed its sea trials.
[02:39.480 --> 02:43.920]  The activists condemned what they described as Israeli lawfare.
[02:43.920 --> 02:48.880]  This year, eight Turkish and one Turkish-American activists were killed in international waters
[02:48.880 --> 03:17.880]  by Israeli commandos en route to Gaza to deliver humanitarian aid.
[03:49.880 --> 03:56.680]  Alright folks, good evening, it is Monday night, June 27th, 2011, it is traffic night,
[03:56.680 --> 04:01.520]  and before we get into taking your calls, I would like to talk about today's events
[04:01.520 --> 04:04.800]  down at the state capitol here in Texas.
[04:04.800 --> 04:12.320]  Today we had the TSA bill vote and argument and rally and support thereof by lots of
[04:12.320 --> 04:16.000]  folks in the Patriot Movement here in Austin.
[04:16.000 --> 04:21.000]  If you weren't down here today and you were in Austin, shame on you.
[04:21.000 --> 04:27.360]  We had approximately, coming and going, all told, probably about 200 people down there.
[04:27.360 --> 04:32.040]  We could have used 2,000.
[04:32.040 --> 04:36.680]  We came very close to raising the roof off the building just with what we had.
[04:36.680 --> 04:41.200]  If we had been able to multiply that by a factor of 10, we could have driven the entire
[04:41.200 --> 04:46.720]  population from the building, like rats leaving a sinking ship.
[04:46.720 --> 04:51.560]  We definitely had the DPS attention today, no matter where we went.
[04:51.560 --> 04:56.760]  There was five or six posted at every entry to wherever we happened to be standing at
[04:56.760 --> 04:57.760]  the moment.
[04:57.760 --> 05:01.960]  I did get to meet Alex Jones for the first time in person today, though I've listened
[05:01.960 --> 05:07.480]  to him often and everything, and I got quite a surprise when I told him that he had interviewed
[05:07.480 --> 05:11.680]  Randy on the show and that I was his co-host, he goes, oh, hey, I listened to your show.
[05:11.680 --> 05:14.200]  I'm like, Alex Jones listens to me on purpose.
[05:14.200 --> 05:15.200]  Yeah, all right.
[05:15.200 --> 05:19.000]  I'm actually surprised any of you folks out there really won't listen to me on purpose,
[05:19.000 --> 05:20.000]  but I'm glad that you do.
[05:20.000 --> 05:25.520]  If for no other reason than the fact that we try to bring the information, it's useful.
[05:25.520 --> 05:31.760]  Now this brings me to something that, besides just the TSA thing, I've been having a meeting
[05:31.760 --> 05:37.160]  with a bunch of the legislators down here off and on while I've been here and haven't
[05:37.160 --> 05:42.280]  had one in several weeks because these guys have all been preparing for what they seem
[05:42.280 --> 05:45.760]  to know in advance was going to be a call special session.
[05:45.760 --> 05:51.520]  So they have basically blocked all access to their offices via their calendars by appointment
[05:51.520 --> 05:55.800]  for anybody other than those that have something to do directly with the bills in the special
[05:55.800 --> 05:57.200]  session.
[05:57.200 --> 06:00.360]  So that being said, I haven't got to talk to them lately directly.
[06:00.360 --> 06:03.600]  I did manage to corner a couple of them while I was down here today and ask them what was
[06:03.600 --> 06:10.360]  going on, including Representative Miles, whose bill I testified on behalf of down there
[06:10.360 --> 06:17.520]  regarding the increase of abuse of official or official oppression to a second degree
[06:17.520 --> 06:22.080]  felony here in Texas rather than just a class A misdemeanor.
[06:22.080 --> 06:27.120]  But after I've talked to these representatives, there's something that's been nagging at me
[06:27.120 --> 06:30.600]  about the way this system is set up to work.
[06:30.600 --> 06:39.280]  Now we all agree that every district or set of districts have a particular representative
[06:39.280 --> 06:43.480]  that's been elected to represent those districts.
[06:43.480 --> 06:50.120]  Now the problem I'm having with the way this is being done is, is that you have freshman
[06:50.120 --> 06:55.400]  electorates going in as representatives and you have those that claim seniority because
[06:55.400 --> 06:58.680]  they're prior elected and so on and so forth.
[06:58.680 --> 07:02.120]  But this to me creates a problem.
[07:02.120 --> 07:07.720]  First off, the people that have been elected before get first picked about everything
[07:07.720 --> 07:13.360]  in the building, the better offices, this, what committees, so on and so forth that they
[07:13.360 --> 07:16.040]  want to be on.
[07:16.040 --> 07:20.480]  And then of course, the freshmen get whatever's left over.
[07:20.480 --> 07:26.720]  The freshmen also have problems getting their bills passed because the senior representatives
[07:26.720 --> 07:31.840]  will and deal to block them, shortcut them, water them down like I did with the TSA bill
[07:31.840 --> 07:35.440]  today and so on and so forth.
[07:35.440 --> 07:42.360]  Which puts me in the state of mind of asking, where exactly is the equal representation
[07:42.360 --> 07:47.880]  of the people of all of the districts of Texas in this pecking order?
[07:47.880 --> 07:54.000]  If my representative happens to be a freshman, then my rights are not being properly represented
[07:54.000 --> 08:02.960]  because he can be cow-towed by these more senior representatives of the prior electorate.
[08:02.960 --> 08:04.600]  How is that possible?
[08:04.600 --> 08:07.160]  Why is that possible?
[08:07.160 --> 08:13.840]  How is it that I have the same rights as every other individual in Texas, yet my representative
[08:13.840 --> 08:20.400]  cannot effectively represent me because he's a freshman?
[08:20.400 --> 08:28.280]  This is the predicament that David Simpson's districts found themselves in when he got elected.
[08:28.280 --> 08:37.560]  He brought in the anti-groping bill and had to make concessions so that the seniors would
[08:37.560 --> 08:44.680]  allow his bill to even get out of committee and get on the floor and get voted on.
[08:44.680 --> 08:50.760]  Then when it's all said and done, they gutted it so badly that it's practically useless.
[08:50.760 --> 08:56.640]  The way they did this was they changed the language in the bill from a requirement of
[08:56.640 --> 09:03.800]  probable cause, which any law enforcement knows he has to have in order to do anything
[09:03.800 --> 09:06.760]  he must have probable cause.
[09:06.760 --> 09:10.960]  But because we're dealing with the TSA, we set a lower standard.
[09:10.960 --> 09:16.680]  Of course, they're a lower standard caliber of human being, but that's beside the point.
[09:16.680 --> 09:21.160]  The standard simply now is reasonable suspicion.
[09:21.160 --> 09:30.280]  Folks, you and I both have enough common sense to understand without a doubt that the federal
[09:30.280 --> 09:34.760]  government is going to declare that the moment you entered the airport and wanted to get
[09:34.760 --> 09:40.880]  on an airplane, you will became reasonably suspicious.
[09:40.880 --> 09:47.760]  In other words, absolutely nothing will be changed by the language of this bill that
[09:47.760 --> 09:52.520]  these idiots voted on today.
[09:52.520 --> 09:58.000]  And believe me, the voices that were present spent a lot of time chanting at a very loud
[09:58.000 --> 10:03.120]  volume treason in the hallways of the Capitol.
[10:03.120 --> 10:07.440]  They use that term with good cause.
[10:07.440 --> 10:17.520]  When your representative refused to represent the wishes of the people, that's not representation.
[10:17.520 --> 10:26.480]  It ceases to be representation when the people's voice is replaced by the representative's
[10:26.480 --> 10:37.240]  will or wheeling and dealing or deal cutting or simply resignation to peer pressure from
[10:37.240 --> 10:41.040]  those that are more senior ranking.
[10:41.040 --> 10:45.440]  So let me make a suggestion.
[10:45.440 --> 10:52.320]  When these people get elected, everything after that point is done by lottery, not by
[10:52.320 --> 10:58.240]  seniority, by lottery, the chairman of a committee is drawn by lottery.
[10:58.240 --> 11:00.760]  The committee members are drawn by lottery.
[11:00.760 --> 11:04.320]  What office you get in the Capitol is drawn by lottery.
[11:04.320 --> 11:11.080]  No more getting an office of power just because it's an office of power.
[11:11.080 --> 11:13.920]  It's random choice.
[11:13.920 --> 11:21.840]  That way, a freshman can control things, at least as the speaker of the house.
[11:21.840 --> 11:28.360]  These districts are represented just as well as any others because no one would be given
[11:28.360 --> 11:29.360]  seniority.
[11:29.360 --> 11:31.760]  There would not be a pecking order.
[11:31.760 --> 11:36.880]  There should not be a pecking order.
[11:36.880 --> 11:42.800]  The people of Texas and any other state of the union that uses this form of legislative
[11:42.800 --> 11:51.720]  contraption cannot be fairly represented if there's a pecking order because those at
[11:51.720 --> 11:57.520]  the lower end of the pecking order must fight against all of those above to get anything
[11:57.520 --> 11:59.680]  done.
[11:59.680 --> 12:05.240]  They're not allowed to look out for the wishes, desires, and necessities of the people that
[12:05.240 --> 12:08.200]  they were put there to represent.
[12:08.200 --> 12:18.040]  Instead, they must deal with the political whims of the other senior cronies.
[12:18.040 --> 12:24.160]  Well, there shouldn't be senior cronies.
[12:24.160 --> 12:27.920]  If you want to make the argument that, well, somebody would experience ought to do this,
[12:27.920 --> 12:32.320]  that, and the other, I say baloney.
[12:32.320 --> 12:36.360]  Every one of them should be knowledgeable about what their job is, and if they don't
[12:36.360 --> 12:41.440]  know somebody ought to be teaching them, I mean, I learned what their job is, and all
[12:41.440 --> 12:44.600]  I had to do was read.
[12:44.600 --> 12:50.640]  That's why I know none of them are doing their job, because what I watch them do and what
[12:50.640 --> 12:58.400]  I read as far as the rules governing what they're supposed to do, they don't match.
[12:58.400 --> 13:03.160]  And it doesn't matter whether it's a legislator, doesn't matter whether it's a police officer,
[13:03.160 --> 13:11.480]  doesn't matter whether it's a judge or prosecuting attorney, none of them are playing by the rules.
[13:11.480 --> 13:18.360]  And yet, they want to hold us accountable to every single rule in the book and act like
[13:18.360 --> 13:27.840]  we're the biggest criminals on earth when we refuse or simply don't know.
[13:27.840 --> 13:35.480]  There's something seriously wrong in the state of Denmark, as the old saying goes, okay?
[13:35.480 --> 13:42.840]  I sincerely believe getting rid of this pecking order might equalize the playing field for
[13:42.840 --> 13:47.960]  every representative for every district here in Texas.
[13:47.960 --> 13:56.320]  People like Dewhurst and Perry wouldn't be able to control things from the top down, because
[13:56.320 --> 14:06.600]  if someone like Simpson was the Speaker of the House or the Speaker of the Senate, he
[14:06.600 --> 14:11.040]  wouldn't put up with that kind of crap from those guys.
[14:11.040 --> 14:15.200]  At least I would like to believe he wouldn't.
[14:15.200 --> 14:22.040]  And so, those that would aren't necessarily in a position to ensure that it's done.
[14:22.040 --> 14:28.480]  Now, the same thing can be said about making sure that there are term limits.
[14:28.480 --> 14:32.720]  If they can't stay in, they can't get seniority.
[14:32.720 --> 14:36.440]  So why not make it both ways?
[14:36.440 --> 14:43.760]  Nobody serves more than two terms, no pecking order, because everything is done by lot.
[14:43.760 --> 14:51.480]  So this would keep the balance of power a lot more equal in favor of the people of Texas
[14:51.480 --> 14:57.360]  rather than the power players in the legislature.
[14:57.360 --> 14:59.920]  Just a suggestion and recommendation.
[14:59.920 --> 15:04.440]  If you got any thoughts on the subject, please feel free to call in about it.
[15:04.440 --> 15:10.360]  The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[15:10.360 --> 15:11.440]  It is traffic night.
[15:11.440 --> 15:13.640]  This is not necessarily the only thing we can talk about.
[15:13.640 --> 15:17.560]  So if you do have any traffic issues or anything of that nature, please feel free to call in
[15:17.560 --> 15:19.040]  with those.
[15:19.040 --> 15:22.880]  But this is something that I've been thinking about for a while and it made me want to ask
[15:22.880 --> 15:24.040]  that question.
[15:24.040 --> 15:29.720]  Just how did we get to the pecking order?
[15:29.720 --> 15:35.880]  It bothers me because all I've been able to listen to some of these freshmen representatives
[15:35.880 --> 15:44.840]  talk about is how they're having so much problem about getting their bills before any of the
[15:44.840 --> 15:52.040]  committees or voted out of committees simply because they're freshmen.
[15:52.040 --> 16:04.680]  I really, really think that's a problem because let's consider where we go without it, okay?
[16:04.680 --> 16:13.840]  If there's not a pecking order, then you can't use your seniority or your alleged power because
[16:13.840 --> 16:15.880]  you don't have any.
[16:15.880 --> 16:18.280]  Your power is equal to everyone else's power.
[16:18.280 --> 16:19.440]  It's not greater.
[16:19.440 --> 16:20.440]  It's not lesser.
[16:20.440 --> 16:27.800]  It's equal, which is what representation is supposed to be all about.
[16:27.800 --> 16:34.720]  If it's equal, then the interests of your district have just as much right and ability
[16:34.720 --> 16:38.920]  to be addressed as those of every other district.
[16:38.920 --> 16:46.840]  No more having to overcome the political agenda, at least not through the power players.
[16:46.840 --> 16:52.360]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[16:52.360 --> 16:54.120]  This is Rural Law Radio.
[16:54.120 --> 17:00.800]  We'll be right back on the other side of the break.
[17:00.800 --> 17:05.040]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals, and coin
[17:05.040 --> 17:07.520]  supplies in the Austin Metro area.
[17:07.520 --> 17:09.280]  We also ship worldwide.
[17:09.280 --> 17:13.160]  We're a family-owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin
[17:13.160 --> 17:14.160]  and metals purchases.
[17:14.160 --> 17:19.080]  Because of you, Austin, business has been so good that we've had to move to a new and
[17:19.080 --> 17:20.080]  bigger location.
[17:20.080 --> 17:26.960]  We're now located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, 1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous
[17:26.960 --> 17:27.960]  location.
[17:27.960 --> 17:31.720]  We're on the west side of Burnett Road in the Stanley Insurance Building on the ground
[17:31.720 --> 17:35.080]  floor next to the Ishibon Sushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[17:35.080 --> 17:39.280]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 5.
[17:39.280 --> 17:45.440]  You're welcome to stop in during regular business hours or call 512-646-644-0.
[17:45.440 --> 17:49.880]  Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us on Rural Law Radio or Texas Liberty
[17:49.880 --> 17:50.880]  Radio.
[17:50.880 --> 17:56.240]  That's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new location at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A. We're
[17:56.240 --> 18:00.440]  called 512-646-644-0.
[18:00.440 --> 18:05.720]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.720 --> 18:09.120]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[18:09.120 --> 18:13.560]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.560 --> 18:14.560]  can win two.
[18:14.560 --> 18:19.360]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.360 --> 18:20.360]  civil rights statutes.
[18:20.360 --> 18:24.680]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons?
[18:24.680 --> 18:26.680]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[18:26.680 --> 18:29.320]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports?
[18:29.320 --> 18:33.960]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:33.960 --> 18:39.080]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.080 --> 18:41.240]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.240 --> 18:46.760]  For more information, please visit RuralLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner
[18:46.760 --> 18:49.760]  or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.760 --> 18:57.440]  That's RuralLawRadio.com or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at yahoo.com.
[18:57.440 --> 19:15.840]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:15.840 --> 19:16.840]  Hi folks, we are back.
[19:16.840 --> 19:17.840]  This is RuralLaw Radio.
[19:17.840 --> 19:18.840]  Never Stevens.
[19:18.840 --> 19:19.840]  Andy Kelton.
[19:19.840 --> 19:20.840]  Eddie Craig.
[19:20.840 --> 19:24.000]  This is Monday night, traffic night.
[19:24.000 --> 19:25.840]  We do have a couple of callers up on the board.
[19:25.840 --> 19:29.720]  Barbara, Mike, I see you right there, so hang on just one more minute.
[19:29.720 --> 19:35.400]  The other nice thing about today, because they had so many DPS officers down there today
[19:35.400 --> 19:41.000]  for the special legislative session and all that, I actually during the demonstration
[19:41.000 --> 19:48.080]  got to stand around and talk a little bit with a couple of them and I got to give them
[19:48.080 --> 19:51.720]  a good education about their job.
[19:51.720 --> 19:56.120]  They actually sat there and carried on the conversation and asked questions and were
[19:56.120 --> 20:00.960]  very, very animated about the information I was giving them.
[20:00.960 --> 20:01.960]  They're like, really?
[20:01.960 --> 20:04.040]  I didn't know that.
[20:04.040 --> 20:08.880]  And one of these gentlemen actually happens to be an officer stationed out of Crockett.
[20:08.880 --> 20:09.880]  He actually works in Crockett.
[20:09.880 --> 20:12.360]  He's from Palestine, which is over in my neck of the woods.
[20:12.360 --> 20:15.000]  So he knew right where I was from.
[20:15.000 --> 20:19.080]  And I asked him, I said, if I brought a copy of my traffic seminar book down here, would
[20:19.080 --> 20:21.920]  you guys be interested at all in taking a copy and reading it?
[20:21.920 --> 20:23.080]  And they're like, absolutely.
[20:23.080 --> 20:28.600]  Anything that we can get our hands on that will teach us more about what the law is that
[20:28.600 --> 20:32.840]  we're supposed to operate under, I'd be more than happy to read.
[20:32.840 --> 20:42.360]  So folks, there are those in uniform that are worthy of your praise, that want to know
[20:42.360 --> 20:45.160]  if they're doing things the right way.
[20:45.160 --> 20:52.440]  And they don't necessarily care if the information comes from Joe Blow Off the Street as long
[20:52.440 --> 20:56.760]  as, of course, you can back up what you're trying to get them to understand.
[20:56.760 --> 20:59.200]  And that I can do.
[20:59.200 --> 21:04.800]  But I just want you to know that there are plenty of them out there that are willing
[21:04.800 --> 21:05.800]  to take responsibility.
[21:05.800 --> 21:10.080]  Because one of them even asked me, he goes, do you mean to tell me that every time I've
[21:10.080 --> 21:15.880]  taken somebody to jail for no driver's license that I was the one breaking the law?
[21:15.880 --> 21:19.160]  And I said, yes, sir, if you really don't want to get really technical about it, that's
[21:19.160 --> 21:20.440]  exactly right.
[21:20.440 --> 21:23.160]  They could sue you guys for false imprisonment.
[21:23.160 --> 21:25.480]  There's no question about it that they could do it.
[21:25.480 --> 21:29.680]  And he just shook his head and laughed and said, that is something I've never knew.
[21:29.680 --> 21:32.280]  I've never known that.
[21:32.280 --> 21:34.400]  So they're out there, folks.
[21:34.400 --> 21:38.960]  So don't automatically assume that every guy with a badge and a gun or a guy with a badge
[21:38.960 --> 21:42.240]  and a gun is public enemy number one.
[21:42.240 --> 21:44.000]  They're not.
[21:44.000 --> 21:49.680]  Many of them, OK, many of them want to do the right thing.
[21:49.680 --> 21:55.400]  They just don't know what that is in every instance because they're being lied to in
[21:55.400 --> 21:57.400]  their training.
[21:57.400 --> 22:03.880]  They're being lied to that they by the very people they trusted to educate them properly
[22:03.880 --> 22:07.280]  about what their job is.
[22:07.280 --> 22:13.840]  These guys did not even know that the administrative code is written by their own department head
[22:13.840 --> 22:18.640]  in the section entitled 37 that deals with what their duties are.
[22:18.640 --> 22:20.520]  They didn't know that.
[22:20.520 --> 22:26.080]  They didn't know that the DPS was not classified as a law enforcement agency.
[22:26.080 --> 22:31.520]  You should have seen the look on these DPS officers face when I told them that.
[22:31.520 --> 22:35.680]  If their eyebrows could have cocked any further up on their head, it would have started a
[22:35.680 --> 22:37.480]  new hairline.
[22:37.480 --> 22:38.760]  I mean, it was ridiculous.
[22:38.760 --> 22:44.040]  They didn't even know that they're not a law enforcement agency, according to their own
[22:44.040 --> 22:48.160]  senior department heads.
[22:48.160 --> 22:52.240]  So folks, they're being incorrectly trained.
[22:52.240 --> 22:54.560]  That is not their fault.
[22:54.560 --> 22:56.080]  So keep that in mind.
[22:56.080 --> 23:00.600]  They're not the enemy until they make themselves the enemy.
[23:00.600 --> 23:08.000]  And those are the ones that refuse to hear or understand anything that refuse to accept
[23:08.000 --> 23:15.040]  the truth for what it is, that would rather enforce their will rather than the law.
[23:15.040 --> 23:21.520]  Those are the ones we need to be going after, okay?
[23:21.520 --> 23:28.440]  So before you get hotheaded with one, try to figure out which one you're dealing with
[23:28.440 --> 23:29.960]  because just like anyone else.
[23:29.960 --> 23:37.000]  If you thought you were doing what was correct and proper, then you wouldn't see yourself
[23:37.000 --> 23:39.640]  as doing anything wrong at all.
[23:39.640 --> 23:45.520]  And you would not take it well when someone got in your face and insisted that you were
[23:45.520 --> 23:48.720]  screwing up.
[23:48.720 --> 23:54.760]  It's okay to tell them when they are, but just remember that there's a proper way to
[23:54.760 --> 23:55.760]  do it.
[23:55.760 --> 24:01.080]  You don't have to be loud, cussing, insulting, and you especially don't have to attempt to
[24:01.080 --> 24:02.080]  get physical.
[24:02.080 --> 24:05.760]  No matter who you're dealing with, that's a mistake.
[24:05.760 --> 24:07.000]  Why?
[24:07.000 --> 24:11.120]  Because you're not going to deal with just the one that's in front of you.
[24:11.120 --> 24:17.040]  Good, bad, or ugly, the one thing he has that you don't is the ability to reach up to his
[24:17.040 --> 24:24.480]  shoulder, talk, and get 50 other people just as well on as he is on the scene to kick your
[24:24.480 --> 24:27.360]  butt.
[24:27.360 --> 24:30.880]  Don't forget that.
[24:30.880 --> 24:37.440]  So don't do something to aggravate the situation that makes that their first reaction.
[24:37.440 --> 24:39.360]  That will not help you.
[24:39.360 --> 24:41.760]  It won't help any of us.
[24:41.760 --> 24:46.120]  Keep your cool, keep your thought process functioning.
[24:46.120 --> 24:47.640]  Educate them if you can.
[24:47.640 --> 24:50.760]  Shut up if you can't.
[24:50.760 --> 24:55.200]  But be nice until they refuse to allow you to be nice.
[24:55.200 --> 25:00.640]  And then be nice enough that you don't wind up in trouble, okay?
[25:00.640 --> 25:05.840]  Anyway, that being said, let's start getting to our callers.
[25:05.840 --> 25:07.720]  Let's go to Barbara in Texas.
[25:07.720 --> 25:08.720]  Good evening, Barbara.
[25:08.720 --> 25:09.720]  How can we help you?
[25:09.720 --> 25:10.720]  Good evening.
[25:10.720 --> 25:15.160]  I got a ticket or a notice of an outstanding ticket in the mail from a law firm in Round
[25:15.160 --> 25:16.160]  Rock.
[25:16.160 --> 25:17.160]  No, you didn't.
[25:17.160 --> 25:19.640]  What you got is a mail scam.
[25:19.640 --> 25:20.640]  Okay.
[25:20.640 --> 25:21.640]  Go ahead.
[25:21.640 --> 25:22.640]  Go ahead.
[25:22.640 --> 25:25.080]  Let's educate the rest of the folks on this.
[25:25.080 --> 25:29.960]  It just says, according to the city of Temple Municipal Court, you have an outstanding ticket.
[25:29.960 --> 25:35.440]  The court has referred this past you, manager, our law firm pursuant to Article 103.003,
[25:35.440 --> 25:38.160]  one of the code of criminal procedure.
[25:38.160 --> 25:43.880]  Well, slight problem.
[25:43.880 --> 25:47.320]  You sent me an email stating that this is from 1996, right?
[25:47.320 --> 25:49.320]  Yes, that's right.
[25:49.320 --> 25:54.960]  There's no way for them to ever collect on that, ever, ever, ever.
[25:54.960 --> 26:01.680]  The only way this could do anything is if the court had an outstanding warrant.
[26:01.680 --> 26:06.680]  And then I guarantee you, it would not be a law firm contacting you.
[26:06.680 --> 26:07.680]  Right.
[26:07.680 --> 26:14.000]  What this is is some shaster attorney trying to, they're going around, going to these places
[26:14.000 --> 26:18.920]  to see what tickets are not paid, but here's the problem.
[26:18.920 --> 26:26.120]  If the ticket was never prosecuted, then there's nothing they can do to you other than write
[26:26.120 --> 26:29.520]  you a letter saying, hey, you never paid this ticket.
[26:29.520 --> 26:32.040]  We want to collect the money, pay the ticket.
[26:32.040 --> 26:35.440]  But there's no obligation on your part to do so.
[26:35.440 --> 26:40.280]  They're way beyond statute of limitations, which is two years for a misdemeanor.
[26:40.280 --> 26:41.280]  Okay.
[26:41.280 --> 26:43.280]  Do I need to respond to them?
[26:43.280 --> 26:44.960]  Do I need to send them a letter or anything?
[26:44.960 --> 26:45.960]  No.
[26:45.960 --> 26:46.960]  You don't need to do anything.
[26:46.960 --> 26:49.640]  Here's what I would recommend you do.
[26:49.640 --> 26:53.600]  I would get names of attorneys in that law firm.
[26:53.600 --> 26:57.760]  If you get one of these letters, folks, do this, please do this.
[26:57.760 --> 27:04.520]  Get their names, then file a bar grievous against every attorney in that law firm multiple
[27:04.520 --> 27:12.240]  times for ethics violations and misconduct violations.
[27:12.240 --> 27:17.600]  Is this a visa process?
[27:17.600 --> 27:18.600]  It's not a process.
[27:18.600 --> 27:20.760]  It's not issued by a court.
[27:20.760 --> 27:23.560]  This sounds like a debt collection scam to me.
[27:23.560 --> 27:24.560]  It is.
[27:24.560 --> 27:31.480]  It's a scam propagated by attorney's offices, and what's going to happen is they will keep
[27:31.480 --> 27:32.480]  the money.
[27:32.480 --> 27:36.880]  Barbara, do you have access to your credit report on a regular basis?
[27:36.880 --> 27:38.880]  Yeah, I can.
[27:38.880 --> 27:42.080]  See if this attorney is in your credit report.
[27:42.080 --> 27:47.840]  See if they've even made an inquiry, even if they haven't posted anything negative about
[27:47.840 --> 27:48.840]  the ticket.
[27:48.840 --> 27:55.000]  If they've pulled your credit report, then you could go after them under Fair Credit
[27:55.000 --> 28:00.880]  Reporting Act because they have no permissible purpose to be in your credit report.
[28:00.880 --> 28:01.880]  Okay.
[28:01.880 --> 28:04.720]  So, see if they're in your credit report.
[28:04.720 --> 28:05.720]  I'll do that.
[28:05.720 --> 28:06.720]  Thank you.
[28:06.720 --> 28:11.360]  So, I don't need to do anything, this is basically just to try to bluff you if you're scared
[28:11.360 --> 28:13.160]  enough that you'll do it.
[28:13.160 --> 28:16.720]  Yes, they want to bluff you in the sending in the money.
[28:16.720 --> 28:17.720]  That's it.
[28:17.720 --> 28:20.440]  Because all it says in there about paying is paying them.
[28:20.440 --> 28:21.440]  Exactly.
[28:21.440 --> 28:22.440]  Which is just a tip-off.
[28:22.440 --> 28:24.640]  It doesn't say anything about paying the court.
[28:24.640 --> 28:25.640]  Exactly.
[28:25.640 --> 28:32.600]  So, it's passed a statute, but some people say there's no statute of limitations on anything
[28:32.600 --> 28:33.600]  criminal.
[28:33.600 --> 28:35.600]  No, that's incorrect.
[28:35.600 --> 28:36.920]  Okay.
[28:36.920 --> 28:44.240]  The only time the statute of limitations stops tolling is if there is an outstanding warrant.
[28:44.240 --> 28:48.520]  Until the warrant is executed, the clock stops.
[28:48.520 --> 28:50.160]  Okay.
[28:50.160 --> 28:58.360]  Otherwise, every criminal act other than murder has a statute of limitations.
[28:58.360 --> 29:01.040]  Misdemeanors in Texas is two years.
[29:01.040 --> 29:06.640]  Melonies can be up anywhere from two to five depending upon what it is.
[29:06.640 --> 29:14.520]  And fraud can be without limitation up until the time the fraud is discovered.
[29:14.520 --> 29:21.360]  Once discovery of the fraud has occurred, then it's two years from the day to discovery.
[29:21.360 --> 29:23.360]  Okay.
[29:23.360 --> 29:31.440]  Okay, so you're just saying go do a bar grievance against them because it's been citing this
[29:31.440 --> 29:32.440]  Article 103.
[29:32.440 --> 29:37.440]  Well, if you can't bar grieve the law firms, you have to bar grieve the lawyers in it.
[29:37.440 --> 29:40.480]  Each is a lawyer that's listed on here.
[29:40.480 --> 29:41.480]  Correct.
[29:41.480 --> 29:42.480]  Okay.
[29:42.480 --> 29:44.120]  So, even if they're citing everything like...
[29:44.120 --> 29:45.120]  Wait a minute.
[29:45.120 --> 29:46.120]  Wait a minute.
[29:46.120 --> 29:47.120]  Barbara, we're going to break.
[29:47.120 --> 29:48.120]  Stay right there.
[29:48.120 --> 29:49.120]  Okay.
[29:49.120 --> 29:50.120]  We'll be right back, folks.
[29:50.120 --> 29:52.960]  We've also got Alan and Gerald on the line.
[29:52.960 --> 29:53.960]  Please stay.
[29:53.960 --> 29:54.960]  Right there.
[29:54.960 --> 29:59.840]  Callers will be right back on the other side of the break.
[29:59.840 --> 30:00.840]  I lost my son.
[30:00.840 --> 30:01.840]  My nephew.
[30:01.840 --> 30:02.840]  My uncle.
[30:02.840 --> 30:03.840]  My son.
[30:03.840 --> 30:04.840]  On September 11th, 2000.
[30:04.840 --> 30:08.120]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[30:08.120 --> 30:12.200]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[30:12.200 --> 30:13.200]  I will.
[30:13.200 --> 30:16.080]  The official explanation is that fire brought down building 7.
[30:16.080 --> 30:20.920]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers has looked into the evidence and believed there is more
[30:20.920 --> 30:21.920]  to the story.
[30:21.920 --> 30:23.280]  I am justice to my son.
[30:23.280 --> 30:24.280]  My uncle.
[30:24.280 --> 30:25.280]  My nephew.
[30:25.280 --> 30:26.280]  My son.
[30:26.280 --> 30:27.280]  Go to building what.org.
[30:27.280 --> 30:28.280]  Why it fell.
[30:28.280 --> 30:29.280]  Why it matters.
[30:29.280 --> 30:30.280]  That's what you can do.
[30:30.280 --> 30:37.280]  Yelza, getting burned is a painful experience, and the aftermath can include blistering in
[30:37.280 --> 30:38.280]  an ugly scar.
[30:38.280 --> 30:41.480]  An unconventional home remedy could deliver welcome relief.
[30:41.480 --> 30:45.280]  I've got your Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you why some burn victims
[30:45.280 --> 30:47.480]  are turning to the pantry.
[30:47.480 --> 30:49.400]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:49.400 --> 30:53.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:53.000 --> 30:57.800]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:57.800 --> 31:02.800]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[31:02.800 --> 31:05.520]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[31:05.520 --> 31:09.840]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[31:09.840 --> 31:13.360]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[31:13.360 --> 31:16.400]  Start over with StartPage.
[31:16.400 --> 31:20.480]  My friend Liz burnt her arm in a cast iron pan the other day.
[31:20.480 --> 31:21.480]  Ouch.
[31:21.480 --> 31:26.000]  She ran cold water over the burn, but the pain remained, plus she was concerned about blisters.
[31:26.000 --> 31:27.880]  So she turned to the internet for advice.
[31:27.880 --> 31:33.000]  There she stumbled on a seemingly crazy home remedy suggested by the people's pharmacy,
[31:33.000 --> 31:34.640]  cold yellow mustard.
[31:34.640 --> 31:37.680]  She applied mustard to the burn, and the pain stopped right away.
[31:37.680 --> 31:43.400]  Then she bandaged the area, and the next day she was pain-free with no blisters.
[31:43.400 --> 31:47.680]  This burns require a trip to the doctor or the hospital, but for minor burns, you might
[31:47.680 --> 31:49.960]  want to give common yellow mustard a try.
[31:49.960 --> 31:50.960]  It seems to work.
[31:50.960 --> 31:55.960]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:55.960 --> 32:09.960]  Yeah, I got the warrant, and I'm going to solve that to the government then, prosecute
[32:09.960 --> 32:10.960]  them.
[32:10.960 --> 32:17.960]  Okay.
[32:17.960 --> 32:36.520]  All right, folks, we are back, this is the rule of law.
[32:36.520 --> 32:43.000]  Randy Kelton, Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, tonight is traffic night, Eddie's night,
[32:43.000 --> 32:48.000]  but we will talk about other issues, but we cannot take mortgage questions tonight because
[32:48.000 --> 32:52.000]  Randy is the mortgage guy, and he's not here on Monday nights.
[32:52.000 --> 32:55.280]  All right, we're speaking with Barbara in Texas.
[32:55.280 --> 33:01.280]  So Barbara, yes, you would file bar grievances against all the attorneys in the firm and
[33:01.280 --> 33:07.280]  pull your credit report to see if they have made an entry in your credit report or if
[33:07.280 --> 33:10.800]  they have pulled your credit report.
[33:10.800 --> 33:18.120]  If they've even made an inquiry in your credit report, you can go after them with a civil
[33:18.120 --> 33:23.840]  lawsuit under SCRA, Fair Credit Reporting Act, because they have no permissible purpose.
[33:23.840 --> 33:32.960]  In order for some entity to be lawfully authorized to make a credit inquiry on your credit report,
[33:32.960 --> 33:40.120]  you have to have given them permission to do so, either through contract or through
[33:40.120 --> 33:44.400]  applying for a loan or credit or something like that.
[33:44.400 --> 33:48.920]  If you've never heard of these people before and they're contacting you, trying to get
[33:48.920 --> 33:54.880]  money out of you and they just pulled your credit report, they're in big trouble under
[33:54.880 --> 33:59.200]  SCRA, I'm telling you what, and that's where Mike Miris comes in.
[33:59.200 --> 34:00.200]  Go ahead, Eddie.
[34:00.200 --> 34:02.480]  I'm willing to bet they didn't do it through the credit report.
[34:02.480 --> 34:07.160]  I'm willing to bet they'd gone around to these little municipalities and such and
[34:07.160 --> 34:13.000]  asked them for a listing or a report of all the unpaid traffic situations.
[34:13.000 --> 34:14.000]  Of course.
[34:14.000 --> 34:17.160]  And then they've done direct mailings to the individuals there.
[34:17.160 --> 34:22.880]  I mean, I had an attorney's firm try to do that to me and I hadn't even gone to trial
[34:22.880 --> 34:25.000]  on my case yet.
[34:25.000 --> 34:28.640]  My court date hadn't even been set and they were sitting to me and noticed exactly like
[34:28.640 --> 34:29.640]  that.
[34:29.640 --> 34:33.920]  Is this something you would report to the attorney general or just go through the court?
[34:33.920 --> 34:34.920]  Absolutely.
[34:34.920 --> 34:38.080]  Every attorney in Texas must answer to the attorney general.
[34:38.080 --> 34:39.080]  Okay.
[34:39.080 --> 34:41.280]  So is this basically a fraud?
[34:41.280 --> 34:42.280]  Yes.
[34:42.280 --> 34:43.280]  Absolutely again.
[34:43.280 --> 34:44.280]  It's a fraud.
[34:44.280 --> 34:45.280]  It's a fraud.
[34:45.280 --> 34:46.280]  It's a statute of recommendation.
[34:46.280 --> 34:47.280]  Correct.
[34:47.280 --> 34:51.080]  But see, here's the thing.
[34:51.080 --> 34:58.440]  If it threatens you in a way that you believe you would have to pay it or suffer consequences,
[34:58.440 --> 35:00.160]  then it's fraud.
[35:00.160 --> 35:05.560]  If it simply says we're presenting you with this information that says you owe money,
[35:05.560 --> 35:09.040]  pay it, then that's not fraud.
[35:09.040 --> 35:15.320]  You have the option of going, yeah, right, and throwing it away.
[35:15.320 --> 35:19.760]  So check the language of it carefully and see how you feel it.
[35:19.760 --> 35:22.600]  It implies the language to affect you.
[35:22.600 --> 35:28.360]  If it is threatening you or threatening to cause you some type of harm or discomfort in
[35:28.360 --> 35:33.440]  your life, then it's coercive fraud.
[35:33.440 --> 35:38.000]  Thank you so much.
[35:38.000 --> 35:40.000]  You're very welcome.
[35:40.000 --> 35:42.000]  Thank you for calling in.
[35:42.000 --> 35:43.000]  Good night.
[35:43.000 --> 35:44.000]  Thank you.
[35:44.000 --> 35:45.000]  Good night.
[35:45.000 --> 35:46.000]  Good night.
[35:46.000 --> 35:47.000]  All right.
[35:47.000 --> 35:48.000]  Now, you ready to go to Allen?
[35:48.000 --> 35:49.000]  Yep.
[35:49.000 --> 35:50.000]  Let's go to Allen.
[35:50.000 --> 35:51.000]  Good evening, Allen.
[35:51.000 --> 35:52.000]  What can we do for you?
[35:52.000 --> 35:55.920]  Thank you very much for taking my call.
[35:55.920 --> 36:01.480]  I called you about three weeks ago on the cab driver that got the citation by the grand
[36:01.480 --> 36:02.480]  transportation.
[36:02.480 --> 36:07.360]  Yes, sir, and I never did get an email from you so we could hook up and talk about your
[36:07.360 --> 36:08.360]  issue.
[36:08.360 --> 36:09.360]  Right, right.
[36:09.360 --> 36:14.700]  But I haven't received any call from you to ready to meet you.
[36:14.700 --> 36:17.880]  I don't have a phone number for you, Allen.
[36:17.880 --> 36:22.720]  That's why I gave you my email address so you would send me an email with the information
[36:22.720 --> 36:24.080]  for me to get in touch with you.
[36:24.080 --> 36:26.600]  I don't have a computer.
[36:26.600 --> 36:27.600]  Okay.
[36:27.600 --> 36:30.120]  Do you know anyone that does?
[36:30.120 --> 36:34.600]  Well, I try to find.
[36:34.600 --> 36:39.960]  Is it possible that I can meet with you because you said that I can file a lawsuit myself?
[36:39.960 --> 36:45.840]  Yeah, it's possible to meet with me if you want to talk about where.
[36:45.840 --> 36:47.680]  Just tell me where and when.
[36:47.680 --> 36:51.200]  All right, Allen, let me take your number off the air, okay?
[36:51.200 --> 36:52.200]  Okay.
[36:52.200 --> 36:53.200]  All right.
[36:53.200 --> 36:54.400]  At your convenience.
[36:54.400 --> 36:55.400]  Okay.
[36:55.400 --> 36:56.400]  Just stay right there.
[36:56.400 --> 36:57.400]  All right.
[36:57.400 --> 37:01.280]  Well, Debra will take your phone number then, Allen, and then I will give you a call and
[37:01.280 --> 37:07.000]  make arrangements with you all fair, okay?
[37:07.000 --> 37:08.400]  I'm going to assume that's okay.
[37:08.400 --> 37:10.800]  I think it never may have grabbed him already.
[37:10.800 --> 37:11.800]  Okay.
[37:11.800 --> 37:14.000]  In that case, let's go to Gerald in Texas.
[37:14.000 --> 37:15.840]  Gerald, what can we do for you?
[37:15.840 --> 37:17.840]  How's it going?
[37:17.840 --> 37:30.840]  I got a ticket here last Wednesday for a citation, part on unimproved surface.
[37:30.840 --> 37:31.840]  Okay.
[37:31.840 --> 37:45.320]  Now, I was looking at the seminar, and I couldn't find the motion to dismiss, and I was wondering
[37:45.320 --> 37:49.120]  if you had any other ideas on how to attack this.
[37:49.120 --> 37:55.080]  Well, there are several motions to dismiss on various grounds in the seminar material,
[37:55.080 --> 37:59.240]  but in this particular case, who issued the citation?
[37:59.240 --> 38:05.400]  Uh, there's a cop.
[38:05.400 --> 38:07.120]  Okay.
[38:07.120 --> 38:08.120]  That much I got.
[38:08.120 --> 38:12.640]  Can you clarify what kind of cop?
[38:12.640 --> 38:18.040]  Uh, a police officer.
[38:18.040 --> 38:20.040]  Would that be DPS?
[38:20.040 --> 38:22.760]  Would it be county sheriff, or would it be municipal?
[38:22.760 --> 38:23.920]  It's a city.
[38:23.920 --> 38:24.920]  Okay.
[38:24.920 --> 38:26.160]  It's a municipal cop.
[38:26.160 --> 38:27.160]  Yeah.
[38:27.160 --> 38:30.520]  And where were you allegedly parked?
[38:30.520 --> 38:36.400]  I was parked on the side of the driveway in the grass.
[38:36.400 --> 38:37.400]  Side of the driveway?
[38:37.400 --> 38:38.400]  Whose driveway?
[38:38.400 --> 38:39.400]  My dad's.
[38:39.400 --> 38:44.280]  You were parked in your dad's yard?
[38:44.280 --> 38:45.920]  Yeah.
[38:45.920 --> 38:51.840]  And some moronic city cop wrote you a ticket for parking on the grass in your dad's yard?
[38:51.840 --> 38:52.840]  Yeah.
[38:52.840 --> 38:53.840]  Yeah.
[38:53.840 --> 38:59.120]  I was parked there for almost three years now, and they finally gave me a ticket for
[38:59.120 --> 39:00.120]  it.
[39:00.120 --> 39:05.520]  Uh, sorry, they don't have jurisdiction over that piece of property to tell you you can't
[39:05.520 --> 39:06.520]  park there.
[39:06.520 --> 39:07.520]  Yeah.
[39:07.520 --> 39:08.520]  That's what I'm saying.
[39:08.520 --> 39:15.520]  In order for him, because he placed a ticket on my windshield under the wiper blade, in
[39:15.520 --> 39:18.520]  order for him to do that, he trespassed.
[39:18.520 --> 39:19.760]  Exactly.
[39:19.760 --> 39:27.800]  So you go down, take the information, you file a criminal trespass charge at the police
[39:27.800 --> 39:30.760]  department against the officer.
[39:30.760 --> 39:32.280]  Okay.
[39:32.280 --> 39:37.680]  Don't go to the internal affairs or administrative office.
[39:37.680 --> 39:43.800]  You tell somebody you want to talk to a criminal investigator to report a criminal trespass.
[39:43.800 --> 39:48.760]  Do not tell them who it's about until you're sitting down with the investigator.
[39:48.760 --> 39:49.760]  Okay.
[39:49.760 --> 39:50.760]  All right.
[39:50.760 --> 39:53.800]  Now, here's the other thing.
[39:53.800 --> 39:55.640]  Don't tell him it's a cop.
[39:55.640 --> 39:57.200]  Just give him the name.
[39:57.200 --> 40:03.720]  If he recognizes it, oh, well, if he doesn't, let's see what he does.
[40:03.720 --> 40:05.200]  Okay.
[40:05.200 --> 40:07.080]  All right.
[40:07.080 --> 40:12.760]  But file a criminal trespass charge against the cop for stepping onto the private property
[40:12.760 --> 40:16.280]  without probable cause or a warrant.
[40:16.280 --> 40:23.160]  They do not have jurisdiction on the private property about parking in the grass.
[40:23.160 --> 40:26.080]  Yeah, it looks like it's a...
[40:26.080 --> 40:29.480]  Are they alleging a city ordinance on this ticket?
[40:29.480 --> 40:32.080]  That's what I'm pretty sure they're going to base it on, which is...
[40:32.080 --> 40:33.080]  Wait, wait, wait, wait.
[40:33.080 --> 40:34.560]  Does the ticket not say?
[40:34.560 --> 40:43.520]  No, it just says citation violation parked on unapproved surface slash front yard.
[40:43.520 --> 40:47.040]  Unapproved or unapproved?
[40:47.040 --> 40:48.040]  Unapproved.
[40:48.040 --> 40:49.040]  Well...
[40:49.040 --> 40:50.040]  UNAPPROVED?
[40:50.040 --> 40:51.040]  Okay.
[40:51.040 --> 41:00.000]  Well, just exactly since when do you need his approval?
[41:00.000 --> 41:02.520]  Okay.
[41:02.520 --> 41:05.640]  I would file the criminal trespass against the cop.
[41:05.640 --> 41:06.640]  Okay.
[41:06.640 --> 41:13.640]  Then I would go down and file a small claims action against the officer just for being
[41:13.640 --> 41:16.840]  stupid.
[41:16.840 --> 41:19.640]  This is the kind of guy that's being stupid.
[41:19.640 --> 41:25.680]  Yeah, it's a guy that doesn't even have an oath of office.
[41:25.680 --> 41:27.640]  I was planning on...
[41:27.640 --> 41:30.560]  No, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[41:30.560 --> 41:33.160]  How do you know this?
[41:33.160 --> 41:40.080]  It's one of the guys with my brother's deal that he went and asked for all his paperwork.
[41:40.080 --> 41:45.920]  All he got was a letter of appointment, never gave him a...
[41:45.920 --> 41:46.920]  Okay.
[41:46.920 --> 41:50.640]  When you say your brother's deal, what are we talking about?
[41:50.640 --> 41:51.640]  The home invasion.
[41:51.640 --> 41:55.640]  Is this the same house?
[41:55.640 --> 41:56.640]  No.
[41:56.640 --> 41:59.960]  It's not the same house.
[41:59.960 --> 42:00.960]  When that happened.
[42:00.960 --> 42:03.280]  This sounds like retaliation.
[42:03.280 --> 42:04.280]  That's exactly what it's talking about.
[42:04.280 --> 42:07.040]  It sounds like they're trying to intimidate us.
[42:07.040 --> 42:08.040]  That's what I'm saying.
[42:08.040 --> 42:10.120]  This sounds like retaliation.
[42:10.120 --> 42:16.040]  So I would file a second criminal complaint for official oppression against the cop as
[42:16.040 --> 42:17.040]  well.
[42:17.040 --> 42:18.040]  Okay.
[42:18.040 --> 42:21.600]  Do criminal trespass and official oppression.
[42:21.600 --> 42:28.720]  Just don't tell the criminal investigator that it's a cop that you're writing it against
[42:28.720 --> 42:31.080]  or you're swearing it out against.
[42:31.080 --> 42:32.080]  Okay.
[42:32.080 --> 42:33.080]  All right.
[42:33.080 --> 42:34.080]  I do this at the police station.
[42:34.080 --> 42:35.580]  Is that what you said?
[42:35.580 --> 42:36.580]  No.
[42:36.580 --> 42:37.580]  Go do it at the police.
[42:37.580 --> 42:38.580]  Yes.
[42:38.580 --> 42:39.580]  Yes.
[42:39.580 --> 42:40.580]  Take your recorder with you.
[42:40.580 --> 42:41.580]  Okay.
[42:41.580 --> 42:42.580]  Yeah.
[42:42.580 --> 42:43.580]  I got that.
[42:43.580 --> 42:49.280]  The reason I want you to do it at the police station, we want to get them on the record
[42:49.280 --> 42:51.960]  covering their buddy's butt.
[42:51.960 --> 42:53.280]  Yeah.
[42:53.280 --> 42:56.960]  The moment they tell you, well, that's a cop.
[42:56.960 --> 42:59.520]  Yes, it is.
[42:59.520 --> 43:01.120]  And he committed a crime.
[43:01.120 --> 43:04.240]  Are you going to take my complaint or not?
[43:04.240 --> 43:05.240]  Well, no.
[43:05.240 --> 43:06.240]  Great.
[43:06.240 --> 43:08.120]  Now you've got that on recording.
[43:08.120 --> 43:15.680]  Now you get to go to the mayor's office and you get to play the recording for the mayor
[43:15.680 --> 43:21.360]  or whatever individual he sends out to talk to you in his place.
[43:21.360 --> 43:28.080]  Or you inform them that I've got the police department that is refusing to allow the citizenry
[43:28.080 --> 43:35.280]  to press criminal charges against police officers that are committing crimes.
[43:35.280 --> 43:41.920]  And then get the mayor or his representative on recording still refusing to do anything.
[43:41.920 --> 43:46.960]  Now you're going to get to sue not only the cop, but everybody above you.
[43:46.960 --> 43:47.960]  Okay.
[43:47.960 --> 43:52.280]  Anyway, hang on just a second, Gerald, we're going to go to break.
[43:52.280 --> 43:56.280]  This is rule of law radio, call boards empty after Gerald folks will give us a call.
[43:56.280 --> 43:59.280]  We'll be right back.
[43:59.280 --> 44:03.720]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.720 --> 44:06.920]  Win your case without an attorney with jurisdiction.
[44:06.920 --> 44:13.360]  The affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[44:13.360 --> 44:14.360]  step by step.
[44:14.360 --> 44:18.640]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.640 --> 44:22.880]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.880 --> 44:25.520]  Thousands have won with our step by step course.
[44:25.520 --> 44:27.240]  And now you can too.
[44:27.240 --> 44:34.040]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:34.040 --> 44:38.520]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[44:38.520 --> 44:42.880]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.880 --> 44:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.000 --> 44:51.480]  pro se tactics and much more.
[44:51.480 --> 45:01.480]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[45:01.480 --> 45:04.680]  Hey, did you hear Ron Paul's announce he's running for president in 2012?
[45:04.680 --> 45:05.680]  It was Ron Paul.
[45:05.680 --> 45:06.680]  Really?
[45:06.680 --> 45:07.680]  Okay.
[45:07.680 --> 45:08.680]  Put down the cell phone for one minute.
[45:08.680 --> 45:11.680]  Your friends really don't care about your Twitter updates on what you had for breakfast.
[45:11.680 --> 45:14.760]  Oh, but I'd love to make those little smiley faces with punctuation marks.
[45:14.760 --> 45:15.760]  Of course you do.
[45:15.760 --> 45:16.760]  Now, listen closely.
[45:16.760 --> 45:19.880]  You need to go down to Brave New Books and learn as much as you can about Ron Paul and
[45:19.880 --> 45:21.680]  his message before it's too late.
[45:21.680 --> 45:24.400]  They have all of his books and many of the books he talks about.
[45:24.400 --> 45:28.040]  They also have t-shirts, bumper stickers and yard signs so that you can show your support
[45:28.040 --> 45:29.040]  for him during the campaign.
[45:29.040 --> 45:30.040]  Brave New Books?
[45:30.040 --> 45:31.960]  Did they have Harry Potter and Twilight?
[45:31.960 --> 45:36.280]  No, but they do carry a large selection of survival and preparedness books to protect
[45:36.280 --> 45:37.760]  your family in time of emergency.
[45:37.760 --> 45:40.560]  Ugh, that sounds like that's shown the Discovery Channel.
[45:40.560 --> 45:44.680]  Yeah, there's even a wilderness survival expert that teaches classes called Earthskill School
[45:44.680 --> 45:48.320]  that you can sign up for on the website bravenewbookstore.com.
[45:48.320 --> 45:49.320]  What are you doing?
[45:49.320 --> 45:52.800]  I'm tweeting all my friends that they should go to bravenewbookstore.com or down to the
[45:52.800 --> 45:53.800]  bookstore in person.
[45:53.800 --> 45:54.800]  Where's it located?
[45:54.800 --> 45:55.800]  1904 Guadalupe Street.
[45:55.800 --> 45:56.800]  There, it's sent.
[45:56.800 --> 45:57.800]  I even made a smiley face.
[45:57.800 --> 46:26.400]  Great.
[46:26.400 --> 46:28.000]  Okay folks, we're back.
[46:28.000 --> 46:31.240]  We're speaking with Gerald from Texas right now.
[46:31.240 --> 46:37.840]  And Eddie, I just wanted to go over with you for a minute here concerning strategies because
[46:37.840 --> 46:42.800]  when Gerald was asking about where to file the criminal complaint, should he file with
[46:42.800 --> 46:47.840]  the police and I said no and you said yes and the reason I said no is because for the
[46:47.840 --> 46:53.760]  most part you don't want to file criminal charges with the police because they're not
[46:53.760 --> 46:59.240]  an entity authorized by statute to even accept a criminal complaint.
[46:59.240 --> 47:05.760]  You're just filing a police report but in some instances you want to go ahead and do
[47:05.760 --> 47:13.160]  that if the alleged perp is a police officer because like Eddie you were saying you want
[47:13.160 --> 47:16.880]  to get it on the record that they're trying to protect their buddies and then when they
[47:16.880 --> 47:21.720]  refuse to take your complaint then you go to the district attorney and so is that right
[47:21.720 --> 47:22.720]  Eddie?
[47:22.720 --> 47:24.080]  Absolutely.
[47:24.080 --> 47:30.400]  We want to make it clear that the people are getting the raw end of the deal here.
[47:30.400 --> 47:35.520]  When a cop commits a crime, he's going to get away with it because those responsible
[47:35.520 --> 47:41.640]  for crime prevention and they don't prevent crime folks, if you think a police officer
[47:41.640 --> 47:46.640]  prevents crime, you are in a sad state of affairs.
[47:46.640 --> 47:51.280]  The police forces of America are not proactive forces.
[47:51.280 --> 47:54.400]  They are reactive forces.
[47:54.400 --> 48:05.680]  Our right of liberty requires them to be reactive until such a time as an action is taking place
[48:05.680 --> 48:13.400]  that would certainly result in a harm to persons or property or such an act has already been
[48:13.400 --> 48:23.320]  perpetrated, the law enforcement officers of America are not allowed to do jack squat.
[48:23.320 --> 48:26.320]  End of story.
[48:26.320 --> 48:32.760]  So they are not proactive, they don't prevent crime, the crime must be ongoing for them
[48:32.760 --> 48:41.360]  to even get involved or it must be of such a nature like they find out a bomb is going
[48:41.360 --> 48:47.840]  to be detonated somewhere and they actually manage to prevent it, great.
[48:47.840 --> 48:54.200]  But the act of terrorism has already been perpetrated by the placing of the bomb.
[48:54.200 --> 49:00.040]  They reacted to that bomb placement.
[49:00.040 --> 49:05.960]  So what we're trying to show by going when the perp is a police officer, by going to
[49:05.960 --> 49:12.000]  the very people that he works for and showing that they are unwilling to do their job in
[49:12.000 --> 49:20.400]  the protection of the public by letting their own get away with crimes, then we're setting
[49:20.400 --> 49:26.480]  the stage that we need to set to bring that to light.
[49:26.480 --> 49:30.440]  Once you make that recording, you can take it down to the mayor's office and hey, we
[49:30.440 --> 49:32.360]  need to have a little bit of talk.
[49:32.360 --> 49:36.320]  Let's talk about your armed street gang.
[49:36.320 --> 49:41.040]  Here's my evidence that they're down here committing crimes and covering up for each
[49:41.040 --> 49:42.040]  other.
[49:42.040 --> 49:47.120]  Chapter 71 Penal Code says that's a criminal street gang, what are you going to do about
[49:47.120 --> 49:48.120]  it?
[49:48.120 --> 49:49.120]  Oh, nothing?
[49:49.120 --> 49:50.120]  Great.
[49:50.120 --> 49:56.000]  Now that I got that recorded, let's make the media aware of it.
[49:56.000 --> 50:00.760]  And if the media won't handle it, then we'll go to the non-mainstream media and let them
[50:00.760 --> 50:03.320]  handle it.
[50:03.320 --> 50:09.280]  And then you go through the crap out of everybody because it's really evident at that point
[50:09.280 --> 50:13.640]  that they're not doing the job they're paid to do on behalf of anyone.
[50:13.640 --> 50:16.320]  Does it make sense, Gerald?
[50:16.320 --> 50:17.320]  Yeah.
[50:17.320 --> 50:18.320]  Okay?
[50:18.320 --> 50:19.320]  Deborah, does that help clarify?
[50:19.320 --> 50:20.320]  Yeah.
[50:20.320 --> 50:21.320]  Yeah.
[50:21.320 --> 50:22.320]  You want to finish the call?
[50:22.320 --> 50:23.320]  Yes, absolutely.
[50:23.320 --> 50:29.880]  I mean, the situation is going to depend on who you're going after.
[50:29.880 --> 50:36.560]  If the alleged perp is not a police officer, there's really no need to go file the report
[50:36.560 --> 50:41.120]  with the police because then you're just creating more fights for yourself.
[50:41.120 --> 50:48.520]  You're just creating more complications because then when they don't take your complaint,
[50:48.520 --> 50:55.040]  well, now you got to go after them and there's just no reason to go there unless, like Eddie,
[50:55.040 --> 50:58.360]  like you're saying, unless it's a police officer involved and then it's part of the
[50:58.360 --> 51:00.040]  strategy.
[51:00.040 --> 51:01.680]  Yep.
[51:01.680 --> 51:05.240]  So that would be my reason behind it, Gerald, but that would be the first thing I'd do is
[51:05.240 --> 51:11.240]  go down and file those police reports slash criminal complaints against the officer for
[51:11.240 --> 51:15.880]  the criminal trespass and official oppression.
[51:15.880 --> 51:20.360]  And then I'd file a small claims action against them as well.
[51:20.360 --> 51:27.320]  And I would put up no trespassing notices on the property, which he shouldn't know about
[51:27.320 --> 51:28.320]  anyway.
[51:28.320 --> 51:29.320]  It's private property.
[51:29.320 --> 51:30.320]  He knows that.
[51:30.320 --> 51:31.320]  He shouldn't have been there.
[51:31.320 --> 51:33.640]  He had no cause to be there.
[51:33.640 --> 51:39.600]  And also, Gerald, remember that when you go to the police, really what's going to be happening,
[51:39.600 --> 51:47.720]  even if you have a verified, sworn, notarized criminal complaint affidavit with you, they're
[51:47.720 --> 51:51.640]  going to want to make you fill out a police report and then they're going to refer the
[51:51.640 --> 51:56.760]  whole matter over to internal affairs or internal investigation.
[51:56.760 --> 51:59.440]  That's not acceptable.
[51:59.440 --> 52:04.480]  They need to forward that criminal complaint to the district attorney.
[52:04.480 --> 52:08.360]  And if they don't do that, well, then they got a problem.
[52:08.360 --> 52:09.360]  Yeah.
[52:09.360 --> 52:13.640]  And do be sure that when you make your sworn statement regarding the abuse of official
[52:13.640 --> 52:21.400]  capacity or, I'm sorry, official oppression, that you're operating under the presumption
[52:21.400 --> 52:25.880]  that this is retaliatory because of the issue with your brother.
[52:25.880 --> 52:32.880]  That way, that is in the record for when you go to sue them.
[52:32.880 --> 52:34.880]  All right.
[52:34.880 --> 52:35.880]  Okay.
[52:35.880 --> 52:36.880]  All right.
[52:36.880 --> 52:37.880]  Anything else?
[52:37.880 --> 52:38.880]  No.
[52:38.880 --> 52:39.880]  That'll be it.
[52:39.880 --> 52:40.880]  Okay.
[52:40.880 --> 52:41.880]  Well, thanks for calling in.
[52:41.880 --> 52:42.880]  Gerald, appreciate it a lot.
[52:42.880 --> 52:43.880]  Thanks a lot.
[52:43.880 --> 52:44.880]  All right.
[52:44.880 --> 52:45.880]  All right.
[52:45.880 --> 52:47.880]  Now we have Joe, Marty, and Susan.
[52:47.880 --> 52:49.880]  Let's go to Joe.
[52:49.880 --> 52:51.880]  Joe, what can we do for you?
[52:51.880 --> 52:56.880]  Hello, Eddie.
[52:56.880 --> 53:01.880]  First of all, everybody, salutations to Eddie and Deborah and this immense endeavor that
[53:01.880 --> 53:02.880]  they have undertaken.
[53:02.880 --> 53:08.880]  I've just heard this thing for the first time this evening, and this is a wonderful thing
[53:08.880 --> 53:09.880]  they're doing.
[53:09.880 --> 53:13.880]  And everybody support this.
[53:13.880 --> 53:18.880]  And the law is serious business, and we all need to get ourselves orientated with it in
[53:18.880 --> 53:22.880]  some way or another, and this show is fantastic.
[53:22.880 --> 53:23.880]  Well, thank you, Joe.
[53:23.880 --> 53:25.880]  We really appreciate that.
[53:25.880 --> 53:28.880]  And that's all.
[53:28.880 --> 53:36.880]  Oh, and police have no obligation to protect or serve you.
[53:36.880 --> 53:44.880]  And your best protection for your family and everything is yourself and your own responsibility.
[53:44.880 --> 53:51.880]  And don't count on anything but that in regards to the police, which is what the conversation
[53:51.880 --> 53:52.880]  was about.
[53:52.880 --> 53:54.880]  So anyways, I'm going to hang up.
[53:54.880 --> 53:55.880]  Thank you.
[53:55.880 --> 53:56.880]  Well, thank you, Joe.
[53:56.880 --> 53:59.880]  We appreciate the call.
[53:59.880 --> 54:00.880]  All right.
[54:00.880 --> 54:03.880]  We've got Marty from Georgia now.
[54:03.880 --> 54:05.880]  Marty, thank you for calling in.
[54:05.880 --> 54:08.880]  What is your question for us tonight?
[54:08.880 --> 54:13.880]  Well, actually, I just wanted to call in and say thank you, guys.
[54:13.880 --> 54:22.880]  I heard you initially, I heard Randy on the Alex Jones show, and I listened basically
[54:22.880 --> 54:26.880]  through the online stream just because I haven't found some place in Georgia, but I want to
[54:26.880 --> 54:34.880]  let you know that I kind of got Eddie's course preemptively just out of general interest
[54:34.880 --> 54:38.880]  because I always had a sense that there was something wrong.
[54:38.880 --> 54:44.880]  But I probably inadvertently got a ticket for allegedly speeding in North Carolina.
[54:44.880 --> 54:49.880]  So in the meantime, I did want to say thank you, guys, because the things that I'm learning
[54:49.880 --> 54:51.880]  in the meantime are just amazing.
[54:51.880 --> 54:55.880]  I feel like I'm learning to be free.
[54:55.880 --> 55:02.880]  Also, you know, I've had some tax problems, and so that led to credit card problems, and
[55:02.880 --> 55:04.880]  the Michael Muir stuff is amazing also.
[55:04.880 --> 55:11.880]  So the basic, you guys, where I feel like you're unique in the industry is you provide real
[55:11.880 --> 55:16.880]  solutions to people that want to do the work and are really interested in learning how
[55:16.880 --> 55:17.880]  to help themselves.
[55:17.880 --> 55:19.880]  And I want to thank you guys for that.
[55:19.880 --> 55:20.880]  Thank you.
[55:20.880 --> 55:22.880]  So stop here real quickly.
[55:22.880 --> 55:23.880]  Sure.
[55:23.880 --> 55:33.880]  What I've done is I've challenged the jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, the subject matter
[55:33.880 --> 55:34.880]  jurisdiction.
[55:34.880 --> 55:39.880]  I've put in my affidavit of the right to travel.
[55:39.880 --> 55:44.880]  I've submitted a couple other documents just using your stuff.
[55:44.880 --> 55:45.880]  Oh, yeah.
[55:45.880 --> 55:54.880]  Just a notice of declination of plea and a notice of the leave of appearance.
[55:54.880 --> 55:59.880]  And basically, I've been, you know, I've driven up there to go to court twice so far.
[55:59.880 --> 56:04.880]  And one of them, I think, was where I was supposed to plea, and basically, I'd have put
[56:04.880 --> 56:07.880]  in my plea or get assigned a trial.
[56:07.880 --> 56:12.880]  But every time I was sitting in front of the judge, the judge never actually spoken to
[56:12.880 --> 56:13.880]  me.
[56:13.880 --> 56:18.880]  I just get kind of relived through the system by the prosecutor.
[56:18.880 --> 56:22.880]  And the last time that I went in front of him, I don't even actually know what happened,
[56:22.880 --> 56:25.880]  but I was so frustrated and so angry, and I walked out of there.
[56:25.880 --> 56:28.880]  I traveled four hours, you know, to write these things, a lot of work.
[56:28.880 --> 56:32.880]  So that's another thing, Eddie, that the work that you're putting in for us and the stuff
[56:32.880 --> 56:36.880]  you're doing for the folks in Texas is just amazing.
[56:36.880 --> 56:43.880]  But, you know, I've kind of used that as the model to figure out all these things in North
[56:43.880 --> 56:44.880]  Carolina.
[56:44.880 --> 56:52.880]  And as soon as you learn to read the rules and do process, what I discovered was, you
[56:52.880 --> 56:57.880]  know, on appearance, on my initial appearance in the district court, it says specifically
[56:57.880 --> 56:59.880]  what the judge is supposed to do.
[56:59.880 --> 57:04.880]  Well, basically, I've been to court in front of a judge twice, and nobody has, like I said,
[57:04.880 --> 57:05.880]  spoken to me.
[57:05.880 --> 57:08.880]  So, of course, they haven't reviewed the case on the merits.
[57:08.880 --> 57:11.880]  I can't remember the language because I'm not sitting in front of my desk.
[57:11.880 --> 57:15.880]  Now, they haven't addressed the issues on its merits.
[57:15.880 --> 57:16.880]  That's right.
[57:16.880 --> 57:18.880]  So they don't look at it and evaluate it.
[57:18.880 --> 57:19.880]  They even have standing.
[57:19.880 --> 57:21.880]  They haven't addressed my jurisdictional issues.
[57:21.880 --> 57:24.880]  They haven't informed me on my right to counsel.
[57:24.880 --> 57:32.880]  They haven't checked to see if, you know, there's six or seven things that are very specific.
[57:32.880 --> 57:36.880]  And so, you know, in the meantime, I'm still ongoing to trial.
[57:36.880 --> 57:41.880]  But I think what happens each time I file all this stuff and the prosecutor shows up.
[57:41.880 --> 57:42.880]  He reads it that morning.
[57:42.880 --> 57:48.880]  Here she reads it that morning and says, holy moly, I've got to extend this thing.
[57:48.880 --> 57:54.880]  But, you know, so since they haven't done any of their own basic due process, I filed a judicial
[57:54.880 --> 57:58.880]  conduct complaint just to see what will happen.
[57:58.880 --> 58:03.880]  Because they really, so far, have wasted eight hours of travel time just to go and stand in
[58:03.880 --> 58:05.880]  front of them and be dismissed.
[58:05.880 --> 58:06.880]  Yeah.
[58:06.880 --> 58:09.880]  How long ago was it they issued you the citation?
[58:09.880 --> 58:11.880]  January 18th.
[58:11.880 --> 58:17.880]  I would move for a dismissal based upon failure provided speedy trial.
[58:17.880 --> 58:19.880]  Sorry about that.
[58:19.880 --> 58:21.880]  Move for dismissal based on what?
[58:21.880 --> 58:24.880]  Failure to provide a speedy trial.
[58:24.880 --> 58:26.880]  Okay.
[58:26.880 --> 58:28.880]  And then I just have one more thing I'll hang up.
[58:28.880 --> 58:29.880]  Okay.
[58:29.880 --> 58:31.880]  Yeah, Marty, just stay right there because we're about to go to break.
[58:31.880 --> 58:34.880]  And after Marty, the call board is open, folks.
[58:34.880 --> 58:39.880]  So if you'd like to call in 512-646-1984.
[58:39.880 --> 58:40.880]  Tonight is traffic night.
[58:40.880 --> 58:41.880]  Eddie's night.
[58:41.880 --> 58:43.880]  We're here to help.
[58:43.880 --> 58:47.880]  And we sure would appreciate it if you folks call in.
[58:47.880 --> 58:50.880]  We'll be back on the other side of the news.
[58:50.880 --> 59:19.880]  That's INN World Report News.
[59:20.880 --> 59:22.880]  Thank you.
[59:50.880 --> 01:00:00.880]  Thank you.
[01:00:00.880 --> 01:00:26.880]  Thank you.
[01:00:26.880 --> 01:00:52.880]  Thank you.
[01:00:52.880 --> 01:01:18.880]  Thank you.
[01:01:18.880 --> 01:01:44.880]  Thank you.
[01:01:44.880 --> 01:02:13.880]  Thank you.
[01:02:13.880 --> 01:02:15.880]  Thank you.
[01:02:43.880 --> 01:03:08.880]  Thank you.
[01:03:08.880 --> 01:03:34.880]  Thank you.
[01:03:34.880 --> 01:03:51.880]  Thank you.
[01:03:51.880 --> 01:03:52.880]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:03:52.880 --> 01:03:54.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:03:54.880 --> 01:03:56.880]  We are halfway through tonight's show.
[01:03:56.880 --> 01:03:59.880]  So if you've got any issues, time is running out to give us a call.
[01:03:59.880 --> 01:04:02.880]  512-646-1984.
[01:04:02.880 --> 01:04:05.880]  We're going to go ahead and finish up with Marty and Georgia.
[01:04:05.880 --> 01:04:07.880]  And then we're going to go to Susan and Jerry.
[01:04:07.880 --> 01:04:10.880]  Marty, what was your other question?
[01:04:10.880 --> 01:04:11.880]  All right.
[01:04:11.880 --> 01:04:15.880]  Just to comment, and I'll just get your thoughts on this one basically.
[01:04:15.880 --> 01:04:18.880]  But with all the stuff that you guys are teaching,
[01:04:18.880 --> 01:04:24.880]  one of the things that I did was I finally discovered the code construction template.
[01:04:24.880 --> 01:04:28.880]  And so it says specifically, and the most amazing thing was person.
[01:04:28.880 --> 01:04:33.880]  And I don't quite have it in front of me, but basically it says a person is defined
[01:04:33.880 --> 01:04:39.880]  as a body politic or corporate or individual.
[01:04:39.880 --> 01:04:44.880]  And I've only listened to you guys for about nine months or something.
[01:04:44.880 --> 01:04:52.880]  But as soon as I read that, it all just was so validated for me that how the world
[01:04:52.880 --> 01:04:54.880]  has just been pulled over our eyes.
[01:04:54.880 --> 01:05:00.880]  And the whole code being constructed around this thing,
[01:05:00.880 --> 01:05:05.880]  I'm just dying now to stand in court and ask them, which of those am I?
[01:05:05.880 --> 01:05:06.880]  Well, Marty.
[01:05:06.880 --> 01:05:09.880]  Yeah, be very careful with that term individual.
[01:05:09.880 --> 01:05:11.880]  I can tell you how they're going to try to use it.
[01:05:11.880 --> 01:05:14.880]  And I can tell you it's going to be wrong.
[01:05:14.880 --> 01:05:18.880]  The problem they have with that is that individual in that case,
[01:05:18.880 --> 01:05:21.880]  almost without exception in statute,
[01:05:21.880 --> 01:05:28.880]  individual simply means one of the listed class.
[01:05:28.880 --> 01:05:31.880]  It doesn't mean a human being.
[01:05:31.880 --> 01:05:41.880]  It simply means someone acting under the authority on behalf of one of these listed classifications.
[01:05:41.880 --> 01:05:42.880]  Yeah.
[01:05:42.880 --> 01:05:48.880]  And Marty, you have to look at the statute for the definition of the word person
[01:05:48.880 --> 01:05:51.880]  and the word individual like Eddie is saying.
[01:05:51.880 --> 01:05:58.880]  Sometimes living human being is in the list, but most of the time it's not.
[01:05:58.880 --> 01:06:04.880]  And so we can't just take this definition of person like what you're talking about
[01:06:04.880 --> 01:06:09.880]  and just apply it to every single situation across the board.
[01:06:09.880 --> 01:06:13.880]  We have to look at what statute we're talking about.
[01:06:13.880 --> 01:06:15.880]  What is the context here?
[01:06:15.880 --> 01:06:18.880]  If it has to do with the transportation code,
[01:06:18.880 --> 01:06:25.880]  then you have to look for the definition of the word person in that code of that particular state.
[01:06:25.880 --> 01:06:32.880]  Or if you're talking about federal law, you have to look for it within the context of that set of law.
[01:06:32.880 --> 01:06:34.880]  You see what I'm saying?
[01:06:34.880 --> 01:06:35.880]  Right.
[01:06:35.880 --> 01:06:45.880]  And that's where, you know, when you guys have described it as a camera compound or compound terms or whatever,
[01:06:45.880 --> 01:06:50.880]  you know what I'm talking about, basically in the basic motor vehicles code,
[01:06:50.880 --> 01:06:55.880]  it lists the person as being a, you know, the same thing, a corporation,
[01:06:55.880 --> 01:06:59.880]  but includes the word individual and then individual is never defined.
[01:06:59.880 --> 01:07:05.880]  So I just found it interesting that, you know, I agree with Eddie's reading of it,
[01:07:05.880 --> 01:07:12.880]  and that's what I would try and assert is that, you know, stating the body politic or corporate,
[01:07:12.880 --> 01:07:17.880]  I mean body's politic and corporate comma or individual, you know,
[01:07:17.880 --> 01:07:21.880]  without a period would indicate that they're talking about an individual,
[01:07:21.880 --> 01:07:27.880]  either corporation or part of a corporate representation or political body or individual.
[01:07:27.880 --> 01:07:33.880]  And so, you know, I realize I have to be, I try to avoid those terms
[01:07:33.880 --> 01:07:37.880]  and just use the simple approach that, you know, not defined as that,
[01:07:37.880 --> 01:07:43.880]  but I just thought it was interesting and I appreciate you guys' help on all this.
[01:07:43.880 --> 01:07:44.880]  All right, Marty.
[01:07:44.880 --> 01:07:45.880]  Well, thanks for calling in.
[01:07:45.880 --> 01:07:46.880]  We appreciate you.
[01:07:46.880 --> 01:07:47.880]  Okay.
[01:07:47.880 --> 01:07:48.880]  Bye-bye.
[01:07:48.880 --> 01:07:49.880]  Bye-bye.
[01:07:49.880 --> 01:07:50.880]  Okay.
[01:07:50.880 --> 01:07:55.880]  Let's go to Susan in Texas.
[01:07:55.880 --> 01:07:57.880]  Susan, what can we do for you?
[01:07:57.880 --> 01:08:00.880]  I received your email and I responded to it,
[01:08:00.880 --> 01:08:02.880]  and also I left my phone number for you to call,
[01:08:02.880 --> 01:08:05.880]  and I just wanted to make sure that you got it.
[01:08:05.880 --> 01:08:08.880]  I have not had a chance to go back and check email.
[01:08:08.880 --> 01:08:12.880]  I came in from the demonstration down at the Capitol straight in the showtime.
[01:08:12.880 --> 01:08:13.880]  Right.
[01:08:13.880 --> 01:08:14.880]  Okay.
[01:08:14.880 --> 01:08:17.880]  So I have not had a chance to look and check email since I've gotten back.
[01:08:17.880 --> 01:08:18.880]  Okay.
[01:08:18.880 --> 01:08:22.880]  Well, it's there, and I'll appreciate your time that you spend when you call.
[01:08:22.880 --> 01:08:23.880]  Okay.
[01:08:23.880 --> 01:08:24.880]  Okay.
[01:08:24.880 --> 01:08:25.880]  Bye.
[01:08:25.880 --> 01:08:27.880]  You're welcome.
[01:08:27.880 --> 01:08:28.880]  Okay.
[01:08:28.880 --> 01:08:30.880]  Well, that was short and sweet.
[01:08:30.880 --> 01:08:32.880]  Let's go to Jerry in Texas.
[01:08:32.880 --> 01:08:34.880]  And after this, folks, we've only got one other caller.
[01:08:34.880 --> 01:08:37.880]  So again, if you got an issue, now's the time to call in.
[01:08:37.880 --> 01:08:40.880]  512-646-1984.
[01:08:40.880 --> 01:08:42.880]  Ian and Jerry, what can we do for you?
[01:08:42.880 --> 01:08:44.880]  Well, hi, Eddie and Deborah.
[01:08:44.880 --> 01:08:46.880]  I wanted to...
[01:08:46.880 --> 01:08:53.880]  I'm sitting here looking at people code section 3802 failure to identify.
[01:08:53.880 --> 01:08:59.880]  And I know, you know, I've talked about this a number of times in the recent past.
[01:08:59.880 --> 01:09:06.880]  I just wanted to get a little bit more into it specifically.
[01:09:06.880 --> 01:09:09.880]  Well, let me read you what I have here.
[01:09:09.880 --> 01:09:20.880]  It says 3802 failure to identify section A. A person commits an offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name,
[01:09:20.880 --> 01:09:31.880]  resident address or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person and requested the information.
[01:09:31.880 --> 01:09:37.880]  Is that the most recent version of that?
[01:09:37.880 --> 01:09:41.880]  If you're looking at the one online, yes.
[01:09:41.880 --> 01:09:47.880]  Yeah, I'm looking at the one online and it does not say detained.
[01:09:47.880 --> 01:09:52.880]  And I wanted to ask you, I've been looking and looking.
[01:09:52.880 --> 01:09:58.880]  I can't find a definition of detained anywhere.
[01:09:58.880 --> 01:10:01.880]  Do you know where that is if it's there?
[01:10:01.880 --> 01:10:02.880]  I have...
[01:10:02.880 --> 01:10:05.880]  If there is one, it'll be in the penal code.
[01:10:05.880 --> 01:10:10.880]  And if it's not, then most likely it's not going to be defined within law anywhere.
[01:10:10.880 --> 01:10:13.880]  You will have to find it within a legal dictionary.
[01:10:13.880 --> 01:10:20.880]  You can do a search on all of the codes together there on the government website for the word detained.
[01:10:20.880 --> 01:10:27.880]  And if you want to find it, put in double quotes, detained means as two separate words,
[01:10:27.880 --> 01:10:32.880]  but put both of them together inside of a single pair of double quotes.
[01:10:32.880 --> 01:10:39.880]  That will pull up every section of code that has a definition for detained.
[01:10:39.880 --> 01:10:46.880]  Do you have any idea what detained means?
[01:10:46.880 --> 01:10:50.880]  Restrained for investigatory purposes.
[01:10:50.880 --> 01:10:52.880]  Okay.
[01:10:52.880 --> 01:10:57.880]  Which the detention does not allow them to conduct certain types of searches.
[01:10:57.880 --> 01:11:02.880]  Like for instance, a detention does not authorize the search of an automobile.
[01:11:02.880 --> 01:11:06.880]  A custodial arrest does, but a detention does not.
[01:11:06.880 --> 01:11:13.880]  A detention does not authorize a pat down underneath the clothing or inside of pockets.
[01:11:13.880 --> 01:11:19.880]  They're only allowed to touch the outside of the clothing of the suspect.
[01:11:19.880 --> 01:11:20.880]  Okay.
[01:11:20.880 --> 01:11:23.880]  Is that federal or is that state?
[01:11:23.880 --> 01:11:27.880]  That's court case determination at every level.
[01:11:27.880 --> 01:11:33.880]  Out of all the cases I've read, state or federal, that's the general declaration of what detained is.
[01:11:33.880 --> 01:11:39.880]  They can't go in your pockets unless it was an arrest, unless you're under arrest.
[01:11:39.880 --> 01:11:41.880]  Correct.
[01:11:41.880 --> 01:11:55.880]  So hence, if they went in your pockets, they better have had the search was illegal if they didn't have some kind of probable cause to place you under arrest.
[01:11:55.880 --> 01:11:56.880]  Exactly.
[01:11:56.880 --> 01:11:57.880]  Yeah.
[01:11:57.880 --> 01:12:01.880]  Or even probable cause to touch you in the first place.
[01:12:01.880 --> 01:12:09.880]  They cannot go into your pockets or your belongings just on a detention.
[01:12:09.880 --> 01:12:12.880]  But they can if you've been arrested.
[01:12:12.880 --> 01:12:13.880]  Yes.
[01:12:13.880 --> 01:12:24.880]  They have the ability and the authority to determine whether or not you're carrying anything that could cause them harm or provide you with a method of escape.
[01:12:24.880 --> 01:12:25.880]  Okay.
[01:12:25.880 --> 01:12:30.880]  I just noticed something else when I'm sitting here looking at this statute.
[01:12:30.880 --> 01:12:31.880]  It doesn't.
[01:12:31.880 --> 01:12:41.880]  It says a person commits an offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence address or date of birth.
[01:12:41.880 --> 01:12:45.880]  It doesn't say you have to show him a picture ID.
[01:12:45.880 --> 01:12:46.880]  That's correct.
[01:12:46.880 --> 01:12:47.880]  Never has.
[01:12:47.880 --> 01:12:50.880]  And that's one of the arguments I've always made.
[01:12:50.880 --> 01:12:58.880]  Them attempting to arrest you because you didn't produce physical identification is absolutely illegal.
[01:12:58.880 --> 01:13:02.880]  The statute does not authorize any such thing.
[01:13:02.880 --> 01:13:05.880]  Amazing.
[01:13:05.880 --> 01:13:06.880]  Okay.
[01:13:06.880 --> 01:13:07.880]  Well, I will.
[01:13:07.880 --> 01:13:14.880]  I'll do a search for the definition of detainment.
[01:13:14.880 --> 01:13:19.880]  And also I'll do the same thing with arrested.
[01:13:19.880 --> 01:13:23.880]  I don't know what arrested means.
[01:13:23.880 --> 01:13:25.880]  Just look for arrest means.
[01:13:25.880 --> 01:13:26.880]  Yeah.
[01:13:26.880 --> 01:13:28.880]  It'll be custodial arrest.
[01:13:28.880 --> 01:13:31.880]  It'll probably be more than one word.
[01:13:31.880 --> 01:13:45.880]  And I can tell you the penal code does have or the code of criminal procedure does have a definition of or it makes the declaration of when a person is under arrest right there in the code of criminal procedure.
[01:13:45.880 --> 01:13:47.880]  All right.
[01:13:47.880 --> 01:13:57.880]  Well, when I find out the exact definitions of these words, maybe I'll call back in and check with you.
[01:13:57.880 --> 01:13:58.880]  Okay.
[01:13:58.880 --> 01:13:59.880]  All right.
[01:13:59.880 --> 01:14:00.880]  Thanks, Eddie.
[01:14:00.880 --> 01:14:01.880]  Yes, sir.
[01:14:01.880 --> 01:14:02.880]  Okay.
[01:14:02.880 --> 01:14:03.880]  Wait a minute, Jerry.
[01:14:03.880 --> 01:14:06.880]  I do have maybe some updated information.
[01:14:06.880 --> 01:14:23.880]  This is from Lexis 3802 Texas penal code as of 2010 paragraph B. It says a person commits an offense if he and oh, oh, if he intentionally gives a false or fictitious name residence address or date of birth to a peace officer.
[01:14:23.880 --> 01:14:35.880]  If who has sorry to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person that's sub sub paragraph one to lawfully detain the person.
[01:14:35.880 --> 01:14:36.880]  Okay.
[01:14:36.880 --> 01:14:47.880]  So if you're detained, it's a crime if you give them a fictitious or false name address date of birth.
[01:14:47.880 --> 01:14:48.880]  Right.
[01:14:48.880 --> 01:14:56.880]  But if you're if you're simply detained, it's not a crime to refuse to give them any information at all.
[01:14:56.880 --> 01:14:57.880]  Right.
[01:14:57.880 --> 01:15:07.880]  So the court has said over and over again that you have the choice of whether or not you engage in the officer's attempt to talk to you.
[01:15:07.880 --> 01:15:13.880]  There's nothing that compels that see this is part of that court ruling that everybody has such a problem with.
[01:15:13.880 --> 01:15:17.880]  And if they had paid attention to it that actually understood what was being said.
[01:15:17.880 --> 01:15:26.880]  The officer does not violate your rights by coming up and engaging you in a conversation, even if he appears to be doing it in an official manner.
[01:15:26.880 --> 01:15:37.880]  If you do not establish probable cause for doing so, you are under no obligation to re engage or counter his attempts to talk to you.
[01:15:37.880 --> 01:15:41.880]  You're not obligated to respond in any way, shape or form.
[01:15:41.880 --> 01:15:49.880]  And if he presses the issue, then he's the one that's in the wrong.
[01:15:49.880 --> 01:15:51.880]  Yes, sir.
[01:15:51.880 --> 01:15:54.880]  Lost your time.
[01:15:54.880 --> 01:15:56.880]  All right. Okay.
[01:15:56.880 --> 01:15:58.880]  I appreciate it.
[01:15:58.880 --> 01:16:00.880]  I'll get back to you.
[01:16:00.880 --> 01:16:01.880]  All right.
[01:16:01.880 --> 01:16:02.880]  Listen to this.
[01:16:02.880 --> 01:16:05.880]  Y'all want to hear a funny case about on the statute.
[01:16:05.880 --> 01:16:07.880]  I'm looking at the annotated code right now.
[01:16:07.880 --> 01:16:12.880]  This is Michael V. State of 2004 case in Texas.
[01:16:12.880 --> 01:16:22.880]  It said that where defendant entered the lobby of sheriff's office to file a welfare concern report on his children.
[01:16:22.880 --> 01:16:33.880]  The defendant was wrongly convicted for failure to identify after he gave the deputy sheriff a false last name and date of birth because there was no proof that he was arrested.
[01:16:33.880 --> 01:16:47.880]  The guy walks into the sheriff's office and gives a false name to make a bogus welfare report and they couldn't pin him for failure to identify for giving a false name because he wasn't arrested.
[01:16:47.880 --> 01:16:48.880]  That's pretty funny.
[01:16:48.880 --> 01:16:50.880]  Yeah, he should have sued the prosecutor for that.
[01:16:50.880 --> 01:16:52.880]  That's malicious prosecution on that charge.
[01:16:52.880 --> 01:16:53.880]  Yeah, really?
[01:16:53.880 --> 01:16:59.880]  Folks, we're going to break. We'll be right back.
[01:16:59.880 --> 01:17:06.880]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals and coin supplies in the Austin Metro area.
[01:17:06.880 --> 01:17:08.880]  We also ship worldwide.
[01:17:08.880 --> 01:17:13.880]  We're a family owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin and metals purchases.
[01:17:13.880 --> 01:17:19.880]  Because of you, Austin, business has been so good that we've had to move to a new and bigger location.
[01:17:19.880 --> 01:17:26.880]  We're now located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, 1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous location.
[01:17:26.880 --> 01:17:34.880]  We're on the west side of Burnett Road in the Stanley Insurance Building on the ground floor next to the Ishibon Sushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[01:17:34.880 --> 01:17:38.880]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 5.
[01:17:38.880 --> 01:17:44.880]  You're welcome to stop in during regular business hours or call 512-646-6440.
[01:17:44.880 --> 01:17:49.880]  Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[01:17:49.880 --> 01:17:55.880]  That's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new location at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A.
[01:17:55.880 --> 01:17:59.880]  We'll call 512-646-6440.
[01:17:59.880 --> 01:18:03.880]  My name is Randall Kelton and I co-host on Rule of Law Radio.
[01:18:03.880 --> 01:18:08.880]  We specialize in showing people how to strike back against corrupt public officials.
[01:18:08.880 --> 01:18:15.880]  With the mortgage crisis worsening, we set our sights on finding a remedy for people who have been cheated by their lenders.
[01:18:15.880 --> 01:18:20.880]  If you have a mortgage or have paid yours off, you have probably been cheated out of thousands.
[01:18:20.880 --> 01:18:22.880]  But there is a remedy.
[01:18:22.880 --> 01:18:36.880]  Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call me at 512-430-4140 and find out how to use the consumer protection laws to recover what the lenders have stolen through fraud and deception.
[01:18:36.880 --> 01:18:43.880]  We will prepare for you a qualified written request that will expose the fraud and put the lenders on the dime.
[01:18:43.880 --> 01:18:47.880]  Lender fraud is bankrupting this country and it's time to fight back.
[01:18:47.880 --> 01:19:16.880]  Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call 512-430-4140 and get the information you need to stop the money changers in their tracks.
[01:19:17.880 --> 01:19:24.880]  You ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:24.880 --> 01:19:29.880]  I was blindsided but now I can see your face.
[01:19:29.880 --> 01:19:35.880]  You put the fear in my pockets, took the money from my hands.
[01:19:35.880 --> 01:19:39.880]  Okay folks, we are back. This is the Rule of Law.
[01:19:39.880 --> 01:19:42.880]  We've got Ronnie from Texas on the line.
[01:19:42.880 --> 01:19:48.880]  With that, the call board is open to callers if you'd like to call in 512-646-1984.
[01:19:48.880 --> 01:19:51.880]  Ronnie, if you just hold one moment please.
[01:19:51.880 --> 01:19:58.880]  I have a question for Eddie along the lines of this failure to ID business.
[01:19:58.880 --> 01:20:06.880]  The way that the bad guys are getting around this has to do with a section of the transportation code.
[01:20:06.880 --> 01:20:15.880]  Whereas if you're in commerce on the roadways and you have a driver's license and they ask you to present your driver's license, you have to show it to them.
[01:20:15.880 --> 01:20:20.880]  But that has nothing to do with the failure to ID.
[01:20:20.880 --> 01:20:23.880]  Eddie, could you please explain the difference there?
[01:20:23.880 --> 01:20:33.880]  Yeah, the transportation code does have a penalty offense which is 521.025A, license to be carried and exhibited on demand.
[01:20:33.880 --> 01:20:39.880]  That statute basically does the exact same thing that 601.053 does.
[01:20:39.880 --> 01:20:49.880]  It requires a license holder to produce their paperwork on the demand of an alleged law enforcement authority.
[01:20:49.880 --> 01:21:04.880]  So that, however, can only be done as far as the license is concerned if you're actually engaging in a commercial activity that involves the use of the license.
[01:21:04.880 --> 01:21:15.880]  They have the right and the authority at that time to demand that you produce the license to prove that you are authorized to conduct that commercial activity.
[01:21:15.880 --> 01:21:34.880]  That, however, is a far cry from the requirement to identify yourself, which requires absolutely nothing more than you providing three pieces of information, which is your name, address, and date of birth.
[01:21:34.880 --> 01:21:35.880]  That's it.
[01:21:35.880 --> 01:21:39.880]  And you have to be arrested before they can even demand that.
[01:21:39.880 --> 01:21:46.880]  That's correct. You have to be arrested, not detained. Okay?
[01:21:46.880 --> 01:21:54.880]  Now, Eddie, let me ask you this concerning this transportation code statute.
[01:21:54.880 --> 01:22:10.880]  Does it say that if you have a license, you have to display it upon request, or does it say that if you're engaged in commerce at the time, you have to display it upon request?
[01:22:10.880 --> 01:22:12.880]  Which one is it?
[01:22:12.880 --> 01:22:30.880]  Well, it goes into the requirement of a person may not operate a motor vehicle. So the requirement is there that it is to be produced if you are operating a motor vehicle, which you can only be doing if you're engaging in commerce.
[01:22:30.880 --> 01:22:35.880]  Okay. So just because you have a driver's license in your pocket or in your wallet, that doesn't mean that you have to get it.
[01:22:35.880 --> 01:22:38.880]  Correct. The requirement is not there that you produce it just because.
[01:22:38.880 --> 01:22:40.880]  Just because you have it. Okay.
[01:22:40.880 --> 01:22:49.880]  You have to be engaged in the activity that requires the license before you can require it to be produced.
[01:22:49.880 --> 01:22:53.880]  I mean, it's like going up an electrician sitting in the park at the baseball game.
[01:22:53.880 --> 01:23:01.880]  The cop knows him because he knows he's an electrician working for this company and walks up to him and demands to see his electrician's license.
[01:23:01.880 --> 01:23:11.880]  The problem is the guy's not doing any electrician's work. He doesn't need the license at that point, even though he's got it. There's no requirement for him to up and produce it.
[01:23:11.880 --> 01:23:28.880]  Right. And so here's what Harmon says. Harmon Taylor, who's been a guest as of frequently in the last few months about this issue, he says that if they pull you over and they demand that you produce your license,
[01:23:28.880 --> 01:23:35.880]  you can try to do what Randy says, which is you can tell them, I have one, but I'm not using it right now.
[01:23:35.880 --> 01:23:43.880]  Give them your ID card first, and then they try to go run it, and then they come back and say, wait a minute, this is an ID card. This is not a driver's license.
[01:23:43.880 --> 01:23:50.880]  Show me your driver's license. And what Randy will say is, well, I have one, but I'm not using it right now.
[01:23:50.880 --> 01:24:06.880]  Harmon says that if they keep getting pushy and threaten you with being arrested and this and that, if you don't produce it, Harmon says that if you turn it over, if you take it out of your wallet and hand it to them,
[01:24:06.880 --> 01:24:24.880]  that is, that can be used as evidence against you that you were engaged in commerce right there. And that the only way to really fight this issue about the fact that we're traveling and we're not in commerce is that you have to be willing
[01:24:24.880 --> 01:24:35.880]  to get arrested over the matter and not hand over your driver's license because once you hand it over, that's evidence you were in commerce, even if you weren't.
[01:24:35.880 --> 01:24:44.880]  Well, I wouldn't go as far as saying it's evidence as far as it would be considered testimony in favor of the assertion.
[01:24:44.880 --> 01:24:45.880]  Right, right.
[01:24:45.880 --> 01:24:56.880]  Because you're basically, when you take that license out and hand it over, you're acquiescing to the assertion that you're engaged in an act that required you to give it up in the first place.
[01:24:56.880 --> 01:25:08.880]  That's all being recorded. That recording will be used in court if necessary, and it will be used to enforce the idea that, hey, did you produce the license when requested?
[01:25:08.880 --> 01:25:24.880]  Yeah, well, if you weren't engaged in an activity that required it, why did you feel that was necessary? And the implications in, that's all they needed to get was that implication before the jury.
[01:25:24.880 --> 01:25:26.880]  Okay, anything else we need to deal with on that aspect?
[01:25:26.880 --> 01:25:40.880]  No, I don't think so. As far as I know, quote unquote, driving without a license or not having a license or operating a motor vehicle without a license is only a Class C misdemeanor, but they'll arrest you anyway.
[01:25:40.880 --> 01:25:46.880]  However, having an expired license is a Class B. For sure, they'll arrest you for that.
[01:25:46.880 --> 01:25:50.880]  No, no, no. Having an expired license is not a Class B.
[01:25:50.880 --> 01:25:53.880]  Operating the motor vehicle with an expired license.
[01:25:53.880 --> 01:26:01.880]  Even then, it must have expired during a period of suspension before it's a Class B.
[01:26:01.880 --> 01:26:02.880]  Okay, okay.
[01:26:02.880 --> 01:26:21.880]  They had to have suspended the license before it expired, then it expired sometime during that suspended period, and you were then operating a motor vehicle under that license. Now it's a Class B.
[01:26:21.880 --> 01:26:22.880]  Okay.
[01:26:22.880 --> 01:26:29.880]  All right. All right, let's go to Ronnie in Texas. Ronnie, thank you for calling in.
[01:26:29.880 --> 01:26:31.880]  What's your question tonight?
[01:26:31.880 --> 01:26:38.880]  I think, I don't know, y'all have successfully wrecked my train of thought.
[01:26:38.880 --> 01:26:39.880]  Sorry.
[01:26:39.880 --> 01:26:58.880]  Going back to the previous caller, at some point it was relevant that I think it was the Supreme Court held, and I think it was U.S. Crop Insurance v. Merrill, that it's more or less on us to make sure anyone that purports to work for the government stays within the bounds of their authority.
[01:26:58.880 --> 01:27:00.880]  That's correct.
[01:27:00.880 --> 01:27:03.880]  I've read that case many, many times.
[01:27:03.880 --> 01:27:14.880]  And it applies a whole lot in IRS cases, and that's maybe a size subject, but at some point, 20 minutes ago that was relevant.
[01:27:14.880 --> 01:27:25.880]  My question is, and I don't know if you remember Marty's call, I'm more or less in the same situation where I'm dealing with a couple of different speeding tickets and pretrial situations.
[01:27:25.880 --> 01:27:39.880]  And the city or county prosecutors are very anxious to not want to really talk about or look at or, I don't know, maybe let the judge look at some motions and things that you file ahead of time.
[01:27:39.880 --> 01:27:41.880]  And it's obviously not a court of record.
[01:27:41.880 --> 01:27:51.880]  So they're like, oh, well, you need to go ahead and just plead guilty and go to appeal and double the fine to double what they call appeal bond.
[01:27:51.880 --> 01:27:52.880]  Yeah.
[01:27:52.880 --> 01:28:07.880]  So my question is, with the motions and the things that we file pretrial, and if we end up obviously having to go to some type of appeal or things like that, I more or less want to hold everyone accountable along the line.
[01:28:07.880 --> 01:28:15.880]  Should we push for a motion hearing or something before these go to...
[01:28:15.880 --> 01:28:22.880]  This is a double-edged sword, depending upon whether or not you are in a court of record or a court of non-record.
[01:28:22.880 --> 01:28:24.880]  Here's the issue.
[01:28:24.880 --> 01:28:30.880]  If you are in a court of record and you do it that route, guess what there isn't?
[01:28:30.880 --> 01:28:33.880]  A court of record, I'm sure.
[01:28:33.880 --> 01:28:35.880]  There isn't a record.
[01:28:35.880 --> 01:28:39.880]  You didn't file anything in the lower court.
[01:28:39.880 --> 01:28:41.880]  So there is no record.
[01:28:41.880 --> 01:28:42.880]  You didn't go to trial.
[01:28:42.880 --> 01:28:43.880]  There is no record.
[01:28:43.880 --> 01:28:45.880]  You plead guilty.
[01:28:45.880 --> 01:28:47.880]  Automatic appeal decision.
[01:28:47.880 --> 01:28:48.880]  You plead guilty.
[01:28:48.880 --> 01:28:50.880]  You lose the appeal.
[01:28:50.880 --> 01:28:51.880]  It's a rigged system.
[01:28:51.880 --> 01:28:53.880]  Don't ever forget that.
[01:28:53.880 --> 01:28:54.880]  Okay.
[01:28:54.880 --> 01:29:05.880]  Pleading guilty in the lower court and paying the appeal bond to go to appeal is tantamount to just nuisance up your own neck and jumping off the scaffolding on your own.
[01:29:05.880 --> 01:29:06.880]  Okay.
[01:29:06.880 --> 01:29:07.880]  That's what they want you to do.
[01:29:07.880 --> 01:29:10.880]  I would not recommend that.
[01:29:10.880 --> 01:29:11.880]  Okay.
[01:29:11.880 --> 01:29:14.880]  I have what is proper documentation in place.
[01:29:14.880 --> 01:29:23.880]  So how do I, I don't know if they keep it at that level and all these people accountable?
[01:29:23.880 --> 01:29:27.880]  Again, you simply do it by making your case at both levels.
[01:29:27.880 --> 01:29:32.880]  If it's a court of non-record, do the same thing that you would do in a court of record.
[01:29:32.880 --> 01:29:33.880]  File your paperwork.
[01:29:33.880 --> 01:29:35.880]  File everything in writing.
[01:29:35.880 --> 01:29:38.880]  Leave nothing to chance or open ended.
[01:29:38.880 --> 01:29:43.880]  Do it like you would just to get in the habit of doing it that way.
[01:29:43.880 --> 01:29:52.880]  But then when you go to your trial de novo, you're going to file all the same paperwork again and now the steps come a little more easily because you've already done them.
[01:29:52.880 --> 01:29:53.880]  You're practiced.
[01:29:53.880 --> 01:29:55.880]  Just do that every time.
[01:29:55.880 --> 01:29:56.880]  Okay.
[01:29:56.880 --> 01:29:57.880]  I may be missing that.
[01:29:57.880 --> 01:29:58.880]  Hang on.
[01:29:58.880 --> 01:29:59.880]  We're going to break.
[01:29:59.880 --> 01:30:02.880]  Top 10 reasons to question the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing.
[01:30:02.880 --> 01:30:11.880]  Number nine, the extra leg former Oklahoma State medical examiner Dr. Fred Jordan had stated, we had eight people with amputated left legs and nine left legs to account for.
[01:30:11.880 --> 01:30:19.880]  Chief pathologist for Northern Ireland, T.K. Marshall, who performed over 2,500 autopsies in his time stated, there's never been an unknown victim.
[01:30:19.880 --> 01:30:25.880]  This leg belongs to a perpetrator close enough to the bomb or his body to be damaged, leaving only a left leg behind.
[01:30:25.880 --> 01:30:26.880]  Who was this person?
[01:30:26.880 --> 01:30:31.880]  Please go to okcbombingtruth.com.
[01:30:31.880 --> 01:30:34.880]  An apple may keep more than doctors away.
[01:30:34.880 --> 01:30:42.880]  A new apple patent wants to keep music pirates away, released at bay by disabling camera and recording features at selected sites.
[01:30:42.880 --> 01:30:46.880]  Dr. Catherine Albright, I'll be back with more in just a moment.
[01:30:46.880 --> 01:30:48.880]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:48.880 --> 01:30:51.880]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:51.880 --> 01:30:56.880]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:56.880 --> 01:31:01.880]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:31:01.880 --> 01:31:04.880]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:31:04.880 --> 01:31:11.880]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:31:11.880 --> 01:31:15.880]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:31:15.880 --> 01:31:22.880]  Movie and music pirates record performances with small powerful devices like the iPhone, then sell them illegally.
[01:31:22.880 --> 01:31:25.880]  But Apple's patent pending solution to the problem is pretty creepy.
[01:31:25.880 --> 01:31:31.880]  It suggests letting an infrared signal shut off the device's recording and photo taking capabilities.
[01:31:31.880 --> 01:31:34.880]  Well, this kill switch might seem like a good idea for movie theaters.
[01:31:34.880 --> 01:31:37.880]  It could interfere with citizens' oversight of government activities.
[01:31:37.880 --> 01:31:45.880]  Imagine if police vehicles could beam those signals to prevent embarrassing documentation of abuses like the Rodney King beating.
[01:31:45.880 --> 01:31:50.880]  While Apple may have good intentions, this is one idea that freedom-loving citizens must oppose.
[01:31:50.880 --> 01:31:55.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32:20.880 --> 01:32:24.880]  Chippin'a your mom, Chippin'a your daddy, Chippin'a your grandpa and your granny.
[01:32:24.880 --> 01:32:29.880]  Chippin'a me, Chippin'a your baby, Chippin'a your family, whole family.
[01:32:29.880 --> 01:32:31.880]  Chippin'a your dad, and they kept her wrongly.
[01:32:31.880 --> 01:32:34.880]  Chippin'a the bee, for you still got EP.
[01:32:34.880 --> 01:32:36.880]  Chippin'a the fish, them all in the sea.
[01:32:36.880 --> 01:32:39.880]  Chippin'a the shark, and the real are wrongly.
[01:32:39.880 --> 01:32:41.880]  You know see mankind going to be crazy.
[01:32:41.880 --> 01:32:43.880]  They take in a king, man they want to weep.
[01:32:43.880 --> 01:32:46.880]  So for security, they've got to tell me.
[01:32:46.880 --> 01:32:48.880]  No matter what they give me, they repeat after you see.
[01:32:48.880 --> 01:32:53.880]  Chippin'a in the morning, Chippin'a in the evening, Chippin'a in the night time.
[01:32:53.880 --> 01:32:57.880]  Experiment on mankind, what man can say them right?
[01:32:57.880 --> 01:33:00.880]  Alright folks, we aren't back this rule of law radio.
[01:33:00.880 --> 01:33:04.880]  We are in the last two segments of the show, so we're running out of time.
[01:33:04.880 --> 01:33:07.880]  If you got any issues, right now we're going to finish up with Ronnie in Texas,
[01:33:07.880 --> 01:33:11.880]  and then we're going to go to Michael in Maryland, and Rob in Connecticut.
[01:33:11.880 --> 01:33:14.880]  So Ronnie, let's see if we can get you wrapped up here.
[01:33:14.880 --> 01:33:20.880]  Okay, I'm not really sure what we left off, but basically what I'm saying is,
[01:33:20.880 --> 01:33:25.880]  I've entered these motions, and the city or county prosecutor, depending on which one,
[01:33:25.880 --> 01:33:29.880]  wants to, you know, more or less shuffle it off, not really, okay, well this one's valid,
[01:33:29.880 --> 01:33:32.880]  this one's not, and so I guess I'm asking...
[01:33:32.880 --> 01:33:35.880]  Well, that's not his determination to make, that's the court.
[01:33:35.880 --> 01:33:39.880]  Right.
[01:33:39.880 --> 01:33:47.880]  So, exactly where do they get the idea that your motions are not valid, or are valid?
[01:33:47.880 --> 01:33:52.880]  I agree, because obviously they're more or less unopposed, and the judge hasn't,
[01:33:52.880 --> 01:33:54.880]  probably even seen them.
[01:33:54.880 --> 01:33:58.880]  Well, you found them with the court, right?
[01:33:58.880 --> 01:34:00.880]  Yes, I found them with the court.
[01:34:00.880 --> 01:34:03.880]  Anywhere I visited, I did them with the court.
[01:34:03.880 --> 01:34:07.880]  Two copies, you know, for the prosecutor and for the court.
[01:34:07.880 --> 01:34:11.880]  Okay, and have you actually been in front of the judge at all?
[01:34:11.880 --> 01:34:16.880]  Um, depending on which case we're talking about, some, yes.
[01:34:16.880 --> 01:34:20.880]  Okay, have you asked the judge if they've read the pleadings?
[01:34:20.880 --> 01:34:23.880]  No, because right now we're still at pretrial, so they're basically saying,
[01:34:23.880 --> 01:34:25.880]  okay, well you're a pretrial, talk to the city...
[01:34:25.880 --> 01:34:30.880]  Well, you're going to be at pretrial anytime you're reviewing motions and doing motions hearing,
[01:34:30.880 --> 01:34:32.880]  you're still at pretrial.
[01:34:32.880 --> 01:34:33.880]  Okay.
[01:34:33.880 --> 01:34:38.880]  So every time you go to court, and the purpose is to go over something that's been filed,
[01:34:38.880 --> 01:34:40.880]  that's a motions hearing.
[01:34:40.880 --> 01:34:41.880]  Okay.
[01:34:41.880 --> 01:34:45.880]  You need to be asking the judge, have you read it?
[01:34:45.880 --> 01:34:46.880]  Okay, the judge...
[01:34:46.880 --> 01:34:48.880]  And when they say yes, then say...
[01:34:48.880 --> 01:34:50.880]  That's always aside.
[01:34:50.880 --> 01:34:55.880]  So should I tell them, hey, we need to have this discussion in front of the judge?
[01:34:55.880 --> 01:34:57.880]  Absolutely.
[01:34:57.880 --> 01:35:01.880]  I'm not here to discuss my motions with you, Mr. Prosecutor.
[01:35:01.880 --> 01:35:05.880]  I'm here to discuss them with the court and have you answer them.
[01:35:05.880 --> 01:35:06.880]  Good.
[01:35:06.880 --> 01:35:09.880]  This is not about what you think my motions are worth.
[01:35:09.880 --> 01:35:12.880]  This is about what the court thinks they're worth.
[01:35:12.880 --> 01:35:16.880]  Right.
[01:35:16.880 --> 01:35:17.880]  Okay.
[01:35:17.880 --> 01:35:23.880]  So if he's attempting to conduct a motions hearing in private, bar grieving,
[01:35:23.880 --> 01:35:29.880]  Prosecutoral Miss Conduct,
[01:35:29.880 --> 01:35:31.880]  he's not allowed to make a ruling on a motion.
[01:35:31.880 --> 01:35:35.880]  He's not allowed to determine whether opposition's motions are good, bad, or ugly,
[01:35:35.880 --> 01:35:40.880]  not unless he's willing to argue those motions before the court.
[01:35:40.880 --> 01:35:42.880]  Right.
[01:35:42.880 --> 01:35:43.880]  Okay.
[01:35:43.880 --> 01:35:47.880]  So a bar grieving for Prosecutoral Miss Conduct.
[01:35:47.880 --> 01:35:48.880]  Okay.
[01:35:48.880 --> 01:35:51.880]  For everything you filed.
[01:35:51.880 --> 01:35:56.880]  I went into a pretrial with a county prosecutor in Blanco County,
[01:35:56.880 --> 01:35:59.880]  and the thing kind of just, she went through all this and she said,
[01:35:59.880 --> 01:36:05.880]  oh, well, this might be valid right here.
[01:36:05.880 --> 01:36:13.880]  And I'm trying to follow the same translator you're going with.
[01:36:13.880 --> 01:36:17.880]  She's told me, okay, well, this was the only one that I think might carry some weight,
[01:36:17.880 --> 01:36:27.880]  and it was the actual information you gave me about motion to watch for non-specificity.
[01:36:27.880 --> 01:36:31.880]  As far as I'm concerned, the complaint was greater than,
[01:36:31.880 --> 01:36:36.880]  well, it was a 10% over the posted speed limit or something like that.
[01:36:36.880 --> 01:36:40.880]  Right.
[01:36:40.880 --> 01:36:41.880]  Okay.
[01:36:41.880 --> 01:36:47.880]  Well, again, I'd bar grieve every one of them for Prosecutoral Miss Conduct that attempted to
[01:36:47.880 --> 01:36:52.880]  conduct a hearing on your motion outside the presence of the court.
[01:36:52.880 --> 01:36:58.880]  And also keep in mind, you can't be summoned to talk to the prosecutor.
[01:36:58.880 --> 01:37:04.880]  And I say rule of thumb, don't talk to the prosecutor at all.
[01:37:04.880 --> 01:37:06.880]  You talk to the court.
[01:37:06.880 --> 01:37:12.880]  In all your documents that you file with the court, in the language that you use,
[01:37:12.880 --> 01:37:15.880]  you are speaking to the court.
[01:37:15.880 --> 01:37:20.880]  You direct your verbiage toward the court.
[01:37:20.880 --> 01:37:25.880]  You don't talk to your opposing party in the documents.
[01:37:25.880 --> 01:37:27.880]  You direct your motions.
[01:37:27.880 --> 01:37:30.880]  Everything you say, you are directing it towards the court.
[01:37:30.880 --> 01:37:34.880]  You never talk to your opposing party anyway, unless you're ordered to.
[01:37:34.880 --> 01:37:36.880]  You can talk about it.
[01:37:36.880 --> 01:37:42.880]  Unless you're ordered to go into some kind of a conference hearing or arbitration or something by the judge.
[01:37:42.880 --> 01:37:48.880]  But still, when it comes to criminal cases, you can't be summoned to the court to talk to the prosecutor.
[01:37:48.880 --> 01:37:56.880]  If you're answering a summons and you're ordered to be in court on a certain date and you show up and there's no judge,
[01:37:56.880 --> 01:38:00.880]  all there is is a prosecutor and the prosecutor wants to talk to you.
[01:38:00.880 --> 01:38:02.880]  No, you don't talk to them.
[01:38:02.880 --> 01:38:04.880]  You say, I'm not talking to you.
[01:38:04.880 --> 01:38:06.880]  I'm here for a hearing.
[01:38:06.880 --> 01:38:08.880]  I'm here to talk to a judge.
[01:38:08.880 --> 01:38:10.880]  You go sit on that side of the room.
[01:38:10.880 --> 01:38:12.880]  I'm going to stay over here.
[01:38:12.880 --> 01:38:17.880]  And if they don't show up within a reasonable period, if the judge doesn't show up in a reasonable period of time,
[01:38:17.880 --> 01:38:24.880]  I mean, Eddie, what would be a reasonable time to wait for the judge and if the judge doesn't show up to leave?
[01:38:24.880 --> 01:38:25.880]  An hour?
[01:38:25.880 --> 01:38:26.880]  20 minutes?
[01:38:26.880 --> 01:38:27.880]  30 minutes?
[01:38:27.880 --> 01:38:28.880]  At least an hour, right?
[01:38:28.880 --> 01:38:30.880]  I don't ask the clerk of the court.
[01:38:30.880 --> 01:38:33.880]  What time is the judge expected to be here?
[01:38:33.880 --> 01:38:41.880]  And if they give me a time in excess of 15 minutes, I'm going to say, look, at 16 minutes, I'm Casper.
[01:38:41.880 --> 01:38:44.880]  We're going to need to reschedule.
[01:38:44.880 --> 01:38:45.880]  OK.
[01:38:45.880 --> 01:38:46.880]  And I've done that.
[01:38:46.880 --> 01:38:53.880]  I've gone in and I've actually gone to the court and I have file notices in the court when the judge was supposed to be there
[01:38:53.880 --> 01:38:55.880]  and didn't show up on time.
[01:38:55.880 --> 01:39:00.880]  And I said, look, I've got things to do. You guys get your act together. Call me.
[01:39:00.880 --> 01:39:06.880]  But you will send me another mailed notice with a proper date and time for me to appear.
[01:39:06.880 --> 01:39:08.880]  I made my appearance.
[01:39:08.880 --> 01:39:10.880]  The judge is the one that didn't.
[01:39:10.880 --> 01:39:12.880]  I was here on time.
[01:39:12.880 --> 01:39:16.880]  There's nothing in that notice that says I got to hang around until they show up.
[01:39:16.880 --> 01:39:18.880]  So you want me back?
[01:39:18.880 --> 01:39:20.880]  Send me another notice.
[01:39:20.880 --> 01:39:21.880]  All right.
[01:39:21.880 --> 01:39:22.880]  Good enough.
[01:39:22.880 --> 01:39:24.880]  All right. Let's go to Michael in Maryland.
[01:39:24.880 --> 01:39:28.880]  Michael, thank you for calling in. What is your question or comment for us tonight?
[01:39:28.880 --> 01:39:30.880]  Yes, hi. Can you hear me?
[01:39:30.880 --> 01:39:31.880]  Yes.
[01:39:31.880 --> 01:39:39.880]  So my question is, first of all, Eddie, my understanding correctly that if the officer says, yes, you are under a custodial arrest,
[01:39:39.880 --> 01:39:42.880]  in other words, when the word arrest is used, you're not being detained.
[01:39:42.880 --> 01:39:44.880]  You say, am I free to go?
[01:39:44.880 --> 01:39:45.880]  They say, no, you're not.
[01:39:45.880 --> 01:39:49.880]  So you say, well, I'm under custodial arrest.
[01:39:49.880 --> 01:39:54.880]  It's always been my understanding at that moment. I would say I'd like you to read me my Miranda rights and please or else,
[01:39:54.880 --> 01:40:02.880]  but you kind of seem to allude tonight that at that moment you can be expected legally to hand over not so much your card,
[01:40:02.880 --> 01:40:06.880]  but to hand over name, address, and date of birth, I think you said.
[01:40:06.880 --> 01:40:09.880]  Well, I'm not saying that I would expect you to do it.
[01:40:09.880 --> 01:40:15.880]  I'm simply saying that Texas legislature passed a statute that says it's a crime not to do it.
[01:40:15.880 --> 01:40:24.880]  And right now the courts, idiotic as they are, are backing them up by saying that none of this information can incriminate you.
[01:40:24.880 --> 01:40:28.880]  That's wrong. That's stupid. And they know it.
[01:40:28.880 --> 01:40:36.880]  But they're cow-towing to the political agenda here, not to the rights of the people to be free from unreasonable search and seizure.
[01:40:36.880 --> 01:40:42.880]  What they're wanting to do basically is for you to give them enough information to do what they want with you.
[01:40:42.880 --> 01:40:43.880]  Right.
[01:40:43.880 --> 01:40:45.880]  But anyway, I'm sorry to interrupt and go ahead.
[01:40:45.880 --> 01:40:47.880]  Yeah, no, it's fine. Thank you.
[01:40:47.880 --> 01:40:54.880]  So what would you suggest I search in the Maryland Code, the Maryland Rules of Procedures for the equivalent statutes?
[01:40:54.880 --> 01:40:56.880]  I mean, how would you suggest they go about that one?
[01:40:56.880 --> 01:41:00.880]  I mean, I don't want to read the whole code and the whole rules just to find that one thing.
[01:41:00.880 --> 01:41:04.880]  Well, I'd search the penal code for the word identify and see what's written around it.
[01:41:04.880 --> 01:41:07.880]  Okay, so I'll look for that one. And it would be the penal code.
[01:41:07.880 --> 01:41:11.880]  It would not be a civil rules procedure or anything like that.
[01:41:11.880 --> 01:41:21.880]  So you first read the actual penal code statute, the criminal code, whatever it's called in your state that has the laws under which they punish you with jail.
[01:41:21.880 --> 01:41:23.880]  That'll be your penal code.
[01:41:23.880 --> 01:41:25.880]  You should identify.
[01:41:25.880 --> 01:41:32.880]  Yeah, you just look for the word identify or identification and see if either of those jump out at you.
[01:41:32.880 --> 01:41:46.880]  If they do read what's there and then find right down the statute number and find an annotated version of that code that has the case law associated with that statute.
[01:41:46.880 --> 01:41:56.880]  That should give you the controlling case law for that particular statute as long as you're looking at a current annotated version.
[01:41:56.880 --> 01:41:57.880]  Excellent. Excellent.
[01:41:57.880 --> 01:42:11.880]  And then my last question, I may have to finish this on the other side. I hope not. Since the Maryland Declaration of Rights, I think it's called Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, and the federal also entitled me to the common law,
[01:42:11.880 --> 01:42:22.880]  is it my understanding correctly from prior comments that I can in fact demand to be taken directly to a magistrate or would I have to check Maryland rules and code for that as well?
[01:42:22.880 --> 01:42:32.880]  The procedures for arrest and criminal prosecution would mandate as to what they must do and how long they have to do it.
[01:42:32.880 --> 01:42:43.880]  So again, you'd be looking at whatever constitutes your code of criminal procedure or there is a possibility that the procedures would be associated with the penal code.
[01:42:43.880 --> 01:42:47.880]  It really just depends on how your legislature and acts your statutes.
[01:42:47.880 --> 01:42:50.880]  But I heard only that it goes back to the Magna Carta.
[01:42:50.880 --> 01:42:57.880]  Well, the common law portion of it does. The Magna Carta itself can be cited as the common law.
[01:42:57.880 --> 01:42:58.880]  Right.
[01:42:58.880 --> 01:43:05.880]  That was determined long ago in England that the Magna Carta, let's see, I forget.
[01:43:05.880 --> 01:43:18.880]  There's another document that cited that the Magna Carta can and is to be cited as the common law upon which all other law should be based in that regard in the English variety of law anyway.
[01:43:18.880 --> 01:43:20.880]  And that, of course, is what we inherited.
[01:43:20.880 --> 01:43:21.880]  Okay.
[01:43:21.880 --> 01:43:26.880]  But that being said, they mutated common law.
[01:43:26.880 --> 01:43:39.880]  Over all this time, they seriously mutated it from what was in the Magna Carta to what they wanted it to be by basically oligarchical declaration.
[01:43:39.880 --> 01:43:43.880]  If you'll hang on, Michael, we'll pick this up on the other side of the break and finish up with you, okay?
[01:43:43.880 --> 01:43:44.880]  Thank you.
[01:43:44.880 --> 01:43:49.880]  All right, folks, rule of law radio 512-646-934.
[01:43:49.880 --> 01:43:51.880]  We're going into our last segment.
[01:43:51.880 --> 01:43:53.880]  We have Michael and Rob on the line.
[01:43:53.880 --> 01:43:57.880]  If you don't call in now, you will not going to get a chance tonight.
[01:43:57.880 --> 01:43:59.880]  We'll be right back.
[01:43:59.880 --> 01:44:00.880]  Hey, did you hear?
[01:44:00.880 --> 01:44:02.880]  Ron Paul has announced he's running for president in 2012.
[01:44:02.880 --> 01:44:03.880]  It is Ron Paul.
[01:44:03.880 --> 01:44:04.880]  Really?
[01:44:04.880 --> 01:44:06.880]  Okay, put down the cell phone for one minute.
[01:44:06.880 --> 01:44:09.880]  Your friends really don't care about your Twitter updates on what you had for breakfast.
[01:44:09.880 --> 01:44:12.880]  Oh, but I love to make those little smiley faces with punctuation marks.
[01:44:12.880 --> 01:44:13.880]  Of course you do.
[01:44:13.880 --> 01:44:14.880]  Now, listen closely.
[01:44:14.880 --> 01:44:19.880]  You need to go down to Brave New Books and learn as much as you can about Ron Paul and his message before it's too late.
[01:44:19.880 --> 01:44:22.880]  They have all of his books and many of the books he talks about.
[01:44:22.880 --> 01:44:27.880]  They also have t-shirts, bumper stickers, and yard signs so that you can show your support for him during the campaign.
[01:44:27.880 --> 01:44:28.880]  Brave New Books?
[01:44:28.880 --> 01:44:30.880]  Do they have Harry Potter and Twilight?
[01:44:30.880 --> 01:44:36.880]  No, but they do carry a large selection of survival and preparedness books to protect your family in time of emergency.
[01:44:36.880 --> 01:44:38.880]  That sounds like that show in the Discovery Channel.
[01:44:38.880 --> 01:44:45.880]  Yeah, there's even a wilderness survival expert that teaches classes called Earthskill School that you can sign up for on the website BraveNewBookstore.com.
[01:44:45.880 --> 01:44:46.880]  What are you doing?
[01:44:46.880 --> 01:44:51.880]  I'm tweeting all my friends that they should go to BraveNewBookstore.com or down to the bookstore in person.
[01:44:51.880 --> 01:44:52.880]  Where's it located?
[01:44:52.880 --> 01:44:54.880]  1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:44:54.880 --> 01:44:55.880]  There, it's set.
[01:44:55.880 --> 01:44:56.880]  I even made a smiley face.
[01:44:56.880 --> 01:44:57.880]  Great.
[01:45:02.880 --> 01:45:04.880]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.880 --> 01:45:16.880]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.880 --> 01:45:20.880]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:20.880 --> 01:45:23.880]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.880 --> 01:45:28.880]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.880 --> 01:45:35.880]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:35.880 --> 01:45:44.880]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.880 --> 01:45:53.880]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:53.880 --> 01:46:02.880]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:02.880 --> 01:46:25.880]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Eddie Craig, Debra Stevens, Randy Kelton. We are in our last segment.
[01:46:25.880 --> 01:46:33.880]  Before we get back to Michael, I do want to give you guys a quick tip on an updated federal program.
[01:46:33.880 --> 01:46:39.880]  It's a combination of both Obamacare and the TSA helping each other out.
[01:46:39.880 --> 01:46:46.880]  It works pretty well, very simple. If you no longer have health insurance because of Obamacare, just go to an airport.
[01:46:46.880 --> 01:46:55.880]  When you're there, you'll get a free X-ray and breast exam, or test-sticular exam, and if you mention coupon code al-Qaeda, you'll also get a free colonoscopy.
[01:46:55.880 --> 01:47:02.880]  So just be sure you know that your health care is up to date and they don't control it.
[01:47:02.880 --> 01:47:04.880]  Alright Michael, let's finish you up here.
[01:47:04.880 --> 01:47:10.880]  That's spectacular. I love it. It was the confirmation of cartorum. It was probably the one you were thinking of.
[01:47:10.880 --> 01:47:12.880]  Yes, confirmation of cartorum.
[01:47:12.880 --> 01:47:23.880]  I guess that's all I have if indeed I can't reasonably rely on a court giving due respect to either of those two documents in terms of being taken directly to a magistrate.
[01:47:23.880 --> 01:47:28.880]  I'll just kind of put that one on the back burner until the republic is actually restored.
[01:47:28.880 --> 01:47:41.880]  You can't because the courts have allowed the decision to come down that the legislature may codify the common law into statute.
[01:47:41.880 --> 01:47:52.880]  Michael, you can bring the common law into your case if there's no statute or case law that is applicable.
[01:47:52.880 --> 01:47:53.880]  I see.
[01:47:53.880 --> 01:48:00.880]  Okay, but if there's statute in place or if there's case law in place, then you have to go on the case law.
[01:48:00.880 --> 01:48:01.880]  Very good.
[01:48:01.880 --> 01:48:11.880]  That's the other thing they've done is the case law is what they have turned to citing as the common law, judge made law.
[01:48:11.880 --> 01:48:14.880]  This is the last thing I'll leave you with then to the next one.
[01:48:14.880 --> 01:48:26.880]  I have put together a 12 slide PowerPoint presentation for this coming Sunday's church service and I would encourage others who can do this to do the same.
[01:48:26.880 --> 01:48:35.880]  I put some patriotic music with it to showcase where we've come from as a nation and how the sovereignty devolved upon the people at the revolution
[01:48:35.880 --> 01:48:43.880]  and how over the course of time it's mutated to where the federal government assumes it has all powers that it hasn't explicit.
[01:48:43.880 --> 01:48:47.880]  Okay, Michael, quickly give us your plug because we have two other callers on the line.
[01:48:47.880 --> 01:48:49.880]  I'm just saying it would be a great idea to do that.
[01:48:49.880 --> 01:48:51.880]  Okay, great.
[01:48:51.880 --> 01:48:53.880]  Yes.
[01:48:53.880 --> 01:48:59.880]  Yes, you've got it. Mail it in or email it to me and I'll be happy to take a look at it and see what we can disseminate with it.
[01:48:59.880 --> 01:49:00.880]  Okay.
[01:49:00.880 --> 01:49:01.880]  All right.
[01:49:01.880 --> 01:49:04.880]  I thought he was saying that he was going to give the presentation this Sunday.
[01:49:04.880 --> 01:49:06.880]  I was wanting to know where it was.
[01:49:06.880 --> 01:49:08.880]  Okay, Michael, drop off the line.
[01:49:08.880 --> 01:49:12.880]  We are going to go now to Rob in Connecticut.
[01:49:12.880 --> 01:49:14.880]  Rob, thank you for calling in.
[01:49:14.880 --> 01:49:16.880]  What is your question or comment tonight?
[01:49:16.880 --> 01:49:22.880]  Yeah, I've got a parking ticket or something for a change for you guys.
[01:49:22.880 --> 01:49:31.880]  And so everyone can play along at home, go to Xquik and put in New Parking Meters Illegal.
[01:49:31.880 --> 01:49:38.880]  That's New Parking Meters Illegal and that will come up to a story from about a year and a half ago.
[01:49:38.880 --> 01:49:50.880]  Someone in Hartford got a parking ticket and he sued the city because they have this new parking meter system with a computerized kiosk.
[01:49:50.880 --> 01:50:00.880]  They took down all the old parking meters and that's great but they never updated the city ordinances to match the new parking system.
[01:50:00.880 --> 01:50:04.880]  So right now there's this big class action lawsuit that's still ongoing.
[01:50:04.880 --> 01:50:06.880]  They moved it from state court to federal court.
[01:50:06.880 --> 01:50:11.880]  So that Xquik search I just gave you will keep bringing to that story.
[01:50:11.880 --> 01:50:16.880]  Now tomorrow I'm going in for one of these parking tickets.
[01:50:16.880 --> 01:50:21.880]  They pulled up the ordinances and they still have not updated the ordinances.
[01:50:21.880 --> 01:50:25.880]  They still have the old system where you put a quarter in the slot and you crank the handle.
[01:50:25.880 --> 01:50:28.880]  They don't have anything about the new computerized system.
[01:50:28.880 --> 01:50:41.880]  So when I go into the parking authorities hearing tomorrow, I'm pretty sure what I'm going to do and say is, look, where are your parking meters?
[01:50:41.880 --> 01:50:47.880]  That's not what the ordinance says. This is what's defined as a parking meter. This is what's defined as a parking meter zone.
[01:50:47.880 --> 01:50:48.880]  None of that exists.
[01:50:48.880 --> 01:50:59.880]  So how can you be saying I got to give you this money now for something that I couldn't possibly have violated because the parking meters are no longer there?
[01:50:59.880 --> 01:51:02.880]  Exactly.
[01:51:02.880 --> 01:51:15.880]  Now, so how would I go about saying to whoever is going to be conducting this hearing that this needs to be dismissed or thrown out or whatever?
[01:51:15.880 --> 01:51:19.880]  Well, you do exactly that.
[01:51:19.880 --> 01:51:28.880]  If they can't prove up that there's a violation because, exactly as you state, the elements to commit the crime don't exist.
[01:51:28.880 --> 01:51:31.880]  It's impossible to violate it.
[01:51:31.880 --> 01:51:34.880]  Is it a criminal statute or is this civil?
[01:51:34.880 --> 01:51:39.880]  This is, I'm pretty sure it's civil. It's just city ordinance in Hartford.
[01:51:39.880 --> 01:51:45.880]  Well, if it's civil, then you take the standard civil defense.
[01:51:45.880 --> 01:51:51.880]  Motions are dismissed for failure to stay to claim upon which relief may be granted.
[01:51:51.880 --> 01:51:53.880]  Can I just say that to them?
[01:51:53.880 --> 01:51:55.880]  Well, you would cite the...
[01:51:55.880 --> 01:51:57.880]  Put it in a motion that's written, yeah.
[01:51:57.880 --> 01:52:10.880]  Put it in a motion, you say that and you cite the statute that they're trying to charge you with and then you state the facts and show how this law does not apply to the facts of the case.
[01:52:10.880 --> 01:52:16.880]  Well, I said it's not even the court. It's just this hearing room at the so-called parking authority.
[01:52:16.880 --> 01:52:20.880]  Right. It's an administrative hearing, but you do the same thing.
[01:52:20.880 --> 01:52:21.880]  Yeah, okay.
[01:52:21.880 --> 01:52:30.880]  Because you have to exhaust all your administrative options before you can appeal to the judiciary if there are administrative options in place.
[01:52:30.880 --> 01:52:38.880]  Okay, so administratively, I would just do the same basic thing, though, the same motion to dismiss based on, you know...
[01:52:38.880 --> 01:52:39.880]  That's what I would do.
[01:52:39.880 --> 01:52:41.880]  Yeah.
[01:52:41.880 --> 01:52:49.880]  Now, on the other hand, what if they say, well, no, this is our parking system. You got a parking ticket. You got to pay.
[01:52:49.880 --> 01:53:03.880]  You have to appeal to the court. Generally, when there is an administrative option in place where you have an administrative hearing, there will be a ruling at the administrative hearing or sometimes subsequent to that.
[01:53:03.880 --> 01:53:13.880]  And generally, it's going to be against you. And at that point in time, you get to appeal generally to the municipal court, and that would be the appellate court in that situation.
[01:53:13.880 --> 01:53:14.880]  Okay.
[01:53:14.880 --> 01:53:23.880]  But you have to, again, I'm just talking general principles here. I'm not familiar with the Connecticut statute on this matter.
[01:53:23.880 --> 01:53:31.880]  You need to look at the code. You need to read up on the code of what the procedure is in place for this sort of thing in your state.
[01:53:31.880 --> 01:53:41.880]  Right. Oh, you know what? This is a shout-out to Dan, Dan from Connecticut. Give me a call in a few minutes after I get off.
[01:53:41.880 --> 01:53:53.880]  Maybe you want to go up there with me tomorrow. Okay. I'm saying, what if they do this? Is there something I can do like Randy does, do a 911 call because they just committed a crime?
[01:53:53.880 --> 01:53:56.880]  No, it's an administrative hearing.
[01:53:56.880 --> 01:54:03.880]  I know that. But if they're trying to perpetrate some kind of fraud on me with this.
[01:54:03.880 --> 01:54:14.880]  Well, if it looks like there's fraud in place, then you could file a criminal complaint. You could file RICO.
[01:54:14.880 --> 01:54:26.880]  That's a federal suit. That's a combination of criminal and civil. If it looks like it goes that far, usually there's state statutes on the books for state RICO.
[01:54:26.880 --> 01:54:38.880]  Here in Texas, it's called the Street Gang Act. I mean, generally, I mean, I don't do the 911 thing on fraud.
[01:54:38.880 --> 01:54:45.880]  I take that into court. I file criminal complaints and prepare lawsuits on that sort of thing.
[01:54:45.880 --> 01:54:56.880]  I mean, time to call 911 is like, say, you go to pull your file from the court clerk and they won't give it to you.
[01:54:56.880 --> 01:54:57.880]  Oh, yeah.
[01:54:57.880 --> 01:55:04.880]  That's when you call 911. Okay. That sort of thing. But fraud, I mean, just me personally, I wouldn't call 911 on fraud.
[01:55:04.880 --> 01:55:09.880]  Yeah. I wasn't totally serious about the 911 thing. I just think it's kind of funny when Randy does that.
[01:55:09.880 --> 01:55:10.880]  Right.
[01:55:10.880 --> 01:55:15.880]  Okay. All right. So I'll be going into this tomorrow and let you guys know how it turned out.
[01:55:15.880 --> 01:55:16.880]  Okay. Thanks, Rob.
[01:55:16.880 --> 01:55:17.880]  Right.
[01:55:17.880 --> 01:55:18.880]  Okay. Bye.
[01:55:18.880 --> 01:55:23.880]  All right. We got one more caller on the board. We got Ronnie from Texas.
[01:55:23.880 --> 01:55:27.880]  Okay, Ronnie, you called back in. You had dropped off before. What do you got for us?
[01:55:27.880 --> 01:55:39.880]  Sorry about that. Real quick. Eddie, I filed a motion to squash the complaint for non-specificity and for improper communication because the county clerk signed the complaint.
[01:55:39.880 --> 01:55:48.880]  So when I met with the county attorney, she was acting like that was no big issue. And why is that a problem? And what's your case law?
[01:55:48.880 --> 01:55:56.880]  And I told her, well, there's no case law. This is a situation that exists. And why does there need to be case law to address that?
[01:55:56.880 --> 01:56:04.880]  And she really hung up on that issue for the longest. So I'm just curious, is there something in particular you would advise that I would say to her to...
[01:56:04.880 --> 01:56:15.880]  This is a first blush issue argument. The court has involved itself in the accusation of the offense by the clerk of doing this as part of their official duties.
[01:56:15.880 --> 01:56:23.880]  Therefore, the court is without jurisdiction because the court is acting as the accuser.
[01:56:23.880 --> 01:56:42.880]  When they try to make the argument that the clerk signed it in their personal capacity and not their official capacity, then ask them, are you attempting to state that this is not done as a part of the clerk's official duties?
[01:56:42.880 --> 01:56:51.880]  And they're not going to be able to answer that because they don't have the authority to mandate the clerk's official duties.
[01:56:51.880 --> 01:56:59.880]  And I guarantee you, if you get the clerk on the stand, they're going to testify that they were ordered to do it as a part of their job.
[01:56:59.880 --> 01:57:03.880]  Thus, they're doing it on behalf of the court.
[01:57:03.880 --> 01:57:08.880]  Right. Okay, perfect. That's the answer I needed. Thank you, sir.
[01:57:08.880 --> 01:57:10.880]  You're very welcome.
[01:57:10.880 --> 01:57:17.880]  Was that it? All right. Hey, Deborah, we may get all these calls answered anyway.
[01:57:17.880 --> 01:57:18.880]  What do you know?
[01:57:18.880 --> 01:57:23.880]  All right, we managed to get the board cleaned up and didn't have to leave anybody hanging.
[01:57:23.880 --> 01:57:27.880]  And we got about four minutes left. Hey, this is a good night.
[01:57:27.880 --> 01:57:31.880]  Folks, I want to thank you all so much for calling in and listening to the show.
[01:57:31.880 --> 01:57:35.880]  I do wish to have been able to get more people down to the Capitol today, but we did make a good showing.
[01:57:35.880 --> 01:57:39.880]  And we definitely were not of the quiet variety while we were there.
[01:57:39.880 --> 01:57:47.880]  So it's time to put the legislators on the hamster wheel and run them till they got nothing left.
[01:57:47.880 --> 01:57:51.880]  You have a legislator in your area that you have access to.
[01:57:51.880 --> 01:57:54.880]  You need to be paying them visits daily.
[01:57:54.880 --> 01:57:59.880]  You need to be having everybody in your community paying them visits daily.
[01:57:59.880 --> 01:58:05.880]  Asking them just exactly what kind of lily-livered, weak-stomach moron they are
[01:58:05.880 --> 01:58:13.880]  that they would allow this TSA groping bill to get so watered down as to be worthless.
[01:58:13.880 --> 01:58:17.880]  They come accountable, folks. We got to.
[01:58:17.880 --> 01:58:20.880]  Yeah, and I want to know why they're not standing up to the Speaker of the House.
[01:58:20.880 --> 01:58:24.880]  I want to know why they're not standing up to the so-called leadership.
[01:58:24.880 --> 01:58:29.880]  How come only a few get to control the whole Congress? That's not right.
[01:58:29.880 --> 01:58:35.880]  What's the deal? Why are they so scared? Why are the cow-towing to a few that they think are in power?
[01:58:35.880 --> 01:58:40.880]  I mean, every vote matters when it comes down to it. So what's the deal?
[01:58:40.880 --> 01:58:45.880]  We need to ask these kinds of questions and make them accountable.
[01:58:45.880 --> 01:58:47.880]  I would agree.
[01:58:47.880 --> 01:58:49.880]  All right, folks. Go ahead, Eddie.
[01:58:49.880 --> 01:58:53.880]  Again, folks, thanks so much for listening in. We will be back on Thursday night.
[01:58:53.880 --> 01:59:18.880]  This has been Rule of Law Radio. We'll see you Thursday.
[01:59:23.880 --> 01:59:30.880]  All right, folks.
[01:59:53.880 --> 01:59:58.880]  All right, folks.