ROL_2011-03-28_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:04.520]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[00:04.520 --> 00:09.480]  Fierce fighting erupted Monday in Cote d'Ivoire's western town of Ducoup
[00:09.480 --> 00:13.640]  between forces loyal to presidential pretender Laurent Bagbo
[00:13.640 --> 00:16.560]  and elected president Alessane Ouattara.
[00:16.560 --> 00:19.280]  Rebels who took control of the north of the country
[00:19.280 --> 00:24.480]  during the 2002-2003 civil war and are now backing Ouattara
[00:24.480 --> 00:26.760]  said Monday they have taken Ducoup
[00:26.760 --> 00:30.120]  which had been under Bagbo's control for nearly a decade.
[00:30.120 --> 00:34.080]  Reuters reported Monday gun battles in the capital Abidjan.
[00:34.080 --> 00:38.200]  Egypt's ousted dictator, Hazni Mubarak,
[00:38.200 --> 00:41.320]  has been put under house arrest along with his family.
[00:41.320 --> 00:45.800]  Egypt's supreme council of the armed forces took power February 11th
[00:45.800 --> 00:48.200]  after Mubarak was pushed from office.
[00:48.200 --> 00:51.800]  Egypt is due to hold parliamentary elections in September.
[00:51.800 --> 00:55.720]  Emergency rule giving police near unlimited powers
[00:55.720 --> 00:57.120]  has yet to be lifted.
[00:58.800 --> 01:01.760]  In Afghanistan, 24 people were killed Sunday
[01:01.760 --> 01:04.720]  and 50 others injured, many of them critically,
[01:04.720 --> 01:08.280]  after a massive bomb exploded at a construction company.
[01:08.280 --> 01:10.520]  The Taliban claimed responsibility.
[01:10.520 --> 01:14.040]  Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said
[01:14.040 --> 01:18.000]  militants had also attacked a joint base of Afghan and NATO forces
[01:18.000 --> 01:19.840]  killing more than 50 soldiers.
[01:19.840 --> 01:23.120]  The bomb attack came a day after more than 10 Taliban militants
[01:23.120 --> 01:25.840]  were killed in a US-led airstrike.
[01:25.840 --> 01:29.640]  Half a million demonstrators marched in London Saturday
[01:29.640 --> 01:32.200]  against massive government spending cuts.
[01:32.200 --> 01:37.760]  Britons gathered to express their outrage over $130 billion in cutbacks
[01:37.760 --> 01:41.880]  the government claims are necessary to tame a runaway budget deficit.
[01:41.880 --> 01:45.080]  The retrenchment is expected to result in a radical shake-up
[01:45.080 --> 01:49.000]  of bedrock social services such as welfare and healthcare
[01:49.000 --> 01:53.280]  and the elimination of nearly half a million public sector jobs.
[01:53.280 --> 01:56.880]  Critics of the austerity programme point out the budget shortfall
[01:56.880 --> 02:00.440]  could easily be closed by slightly increasing taxes
[02:00.440 --> 02:03.480]  on Britain's wealthiest corporations and individuals.
[02:03.480 --> 02:07.520]  Effects of the austerity measures will begin to be felt next month.
[02:07.520 --> 02:10.720]  When libraries start closing, youth programmes disappear,
[02:10.720 --> 02:14.720]  social workers get laid off and fewer buses ply the streets.
[02:14.720 --> 02:19.200]  Rolling Stone magazine says the dozen soldiers portrayed as members
[02:19.200 --> 02:22.880]  of a secret kill team in Afghanistan were in fact operating
[02:22.880 --> 02:25.400]  in plain view of the rest of the company.
[02:25.400 --> 02:28.720]  Far from being clandestine, as the Pentagon has implied,
[02:28.720 --> 02:32.000]  the murders of civilians were common knowledge among the unit.
[02:32.000 --> 02:36.520]  Whistleblower Private Justin Stoner told Army Criminal Investigation Command
[02:36.520 --> 02:39.960]  the platoon have had a lot of practice staging killings
[02:39.960 --> 02:41.600]  and getting away with it.
[02:41.600 --> 02:45.400]  Neither 3rd platoon's commander, Captain Matthew Quiggle,
[02:45.400 --> 02:48.720]  nor 1st Lieutenant Roman Ligze, have been held accountable
[02:48.720 --> 02:51.880]  for their unit's actions, despite their repeated failure
[02:51.880 --> 02:54.240]  to report numerous suspicious killings.
[02:54.240 --> 02:56.960]  In fact, both men have recently been promoted.
[02:56.960 --> 03:02.960]  More details on these stories visit INNworldreport.net.
[03:07.160 --> 03:10.560]  You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network
[03:10.560 --> 03:17.560]  at ruleoflawradio.com, live free speech talk radio at its best.
[03:40.560 --> 03:47.560]  All right, folks, it is Monday night, we're here on Rule of Law Radio.
[04:01.000 --> 04:06.000]  It is March 3rd, or I'm sorry, it is March 28th, 2011.
[04:06.000 --> 04:09.000]  This is Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton,
[04:09.000 --> 04:11.000]  and this is the Rule of Law Radio.
[04:11.000 --> 04:14.000]  Tonight, we're not going to have a lot of material to go over
[04:14.000 --> 04:16.000]  before we start taking your calls.
[04:16.000 --> 04:18.000]  We do, however, have several announcements
[04:18.000 --> 04:22.000]  we need to get opened up with so that we can get the information to you,
[04:22.000 --> 04:24.000]  and then we'll start to take your calls.
[04:24.000 --> 04:29.000]  The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[04:29.000 --> 04:32.000]  If you've got any questions or anything regarding traffic
[04:32.000 --> 04:35.000]  or things of that nature, do process in a traffic case
[04:35.000 --> 04:37.000]  or some other misdemeanor case,
[04:37.000 --> 04:41.000]  call 512-646-1984.
[04:41.000 --> 04:43.000]  Okay, Deborah, you said that there were a couple of announcements
[04:43.000 --> 04:45.000]  you had to make before we got rolling?
[04:45.000 --> 04:47.000]  Yeah, I have a couple of announcements.
[04:47.000 --> 04:50.000]  Erica Rogers and Stephen Rogers from Centrition,
[04:50.000 --> 04:54.000]  they have informed me that there are a few
[04:54.000 --> 04:58.000]  Rule of Law Radio radiation specials left,
[04:58.000 --> 05:02.000]  and we had Stephen on the show, one of our sponsors,
[05:02.000 --> 05:04.000]  the creator, Centrition, on Thursday night.
[05:04.000 --> 05:07.000]  We spent an hour with him discussing the fact
[05:07.000 --> 05:10.000]  that we are basically all under assault
[05:10.000 --> 05:13.000]  and attack right now of low levels of radiation
[05:13.000 --> 05:15.000]  and becoming higher levels of radiation
[05:15.000 --> 05:17.000]  for the last several decades,
[05:17.000 --> 05:20.000]  and so folks, you may want to go back and listen to that interview
[05:20.000 --> 05:24.000]  because he gave us some very valuable advice
[05:24.000 --> 05:27.000]  on how we can continue to chelate,
[05:27.000 --> 05:32.000]  how we should all be on a continual chelation therapy situation
[05:32.000 --> 05:34.000]  and removing heavy metals from our bodies
[05:34.000 --> 05:38.000]  and protecting ourselves against the harmful effects of radiation,
[05:38.000 --> 05:43.000]  and he offered a Rule of Law radiation special, 90 bucks.
[05:43.000 --> 05:46.000]  You get two months of Centrition.
[05:46.000 --> 05:48.000]  That's 10% off the normal price,
[05:48.000 --> 05:53.000]  and plus you get several videos, DVDs, and CDs.
[05:53.000 --> 05:57.000]  One is the Holistic Nutrition Seminar audio.
[05:57.000 --> 05:58.000]  It says here,
[05:58.000 --> 06:02.000]  food should be viewed as fuel more so than entertainment.
[06:02.000 --> 06:05.000]  The Holistic Nutrition Seminar covers everything about planning meals,
[06:05.000 --> 06:08.000]  balancing nutrients, and making better choices.
[06:08.000 --> 06:11.000]  Instructions to download and listen to the audio are emailed,
[06:11.000 --> 06:15.000]  and then we've got the Shin Kinetics video.
[06:15.000 --> 06:19.000]  Shin Kinetics is a great all-in-one mindful exercise program
[06:19.000 --> 06:23.000]  that integrates yoga, Pilates, core, strength training, and dance.
[06:23.000 --> 06:24.000]  After the order is complete,
[06:24.000 --> 06:27.000]  a link is emailed with directions on how to watch and download the video.
[06:27.000 --> 06:33.000]  Then we've got the Shinrobics audio, or Shinrobics, I guess.
[06:33.000 --> 06:36.000]  Downloadable audio covers how to regulate the breathing process
[06:36.000 --> 06:39.000]  and naturally increase our oxygen intake.
[06:39.000 --> 06:41.000]  The links to download the information will be delivered once ordered.
[06:41.000 --> 06:47.000]  Okay, so folks, you get their audio seminars and their video seminars for free
[06:47.000 --> 06:53.000]  with the Rule of Law radiation special, 90 bucks, two months of Centrition.
[06:53.000 --> 06:58.000]  That's 10% off, plus the free audio and video CDs and DVDs.
[06:58.000 --> 07:03.000]  And so if you click on the link on the Rule of Law radio website,
[07:03.000 --> 07:06.000]  you just scroll down a little bit, you'll see a banner that says,
[07:06.000 --> 07:10.000]  you know, with a glass in her hand, and it's a green banner,
[07:10.000 --> 07:13.000]  and it says, more energy, less stress.
[07:13.000 --> 07:19.000]  Click on that link, and it will go to the order page for the Rule of Law radiation special.
[07:19.000 --> 07:22.000]  He was only doing 25, and he said that they sold most of them,
[07:22.000 --> 07:24.000]  but there are a few left.
[07:24.000 --> 07:26.000]  So I just want to let you folks know that.
[07:26.000 --> 07:30.000]  So if you haven't got your Rule of Law radiation special yet from Centrition,
[07:30.000 --> 07:32.000]  please do so.
[07:32.000 --> 07:34.000]  Get them while the getting is good.
[07:34.000 --> 07:39.000]  And another announcement that I have to make concerning a very special guest
[07:39.000 --> 07:43.000]  we're going to have on Friday, back by popular demand.
[07:43.000 --> 07:46.000]  Harmon Taylor is returning.
[07:46.000 --> 07:48.000]  He will be our guest on Friday,
[07:48.000 --> 07:54.000]  and he's going to continue the debunking of the Bernard Von Nodhouse case
[07:54.000 --> 07:59.000]  that Dr. Bill Veith and I and Randy and Eddie and I did on Friday.
[07:59.000 --> 08:02.000]  One thing I wanted to mention that I did not have a chance,
[08:02.000 --> 08:06.000]  that I was not able to mention on Friday because I forgot,
[08:06.000 --> 08:10.000]  Bill Veith called this from the beginning, by the way, folks.
[08:10.000 --> 08:15.000]  He predicted this from the get-go before Bernard was ever even charged.
[08:15.000 --> 08:18.000]  He said, Bernard's going to get in trouble on this because he used the word dollar,
[08:18.000 --> 08:20.000]  and that's exactly what happened.
[08:20.000 --> 08:22.000]  Harmon Taylor says the same thing.
[08:22.000 --> 08:26.000]  Harmon is going to break down the case from a slightly different perspective.
[08:26.000 --> 08:28.000]  We broke it down from a statutory perspective.
[08:28.000 --> 08:33.000]  Now Harmon is going to break it down from a commercial perspective
[08:33.000 --> 08:38.000]  and something called choice of law, which some of you out there may know what it means.
[08:38.000 --> 08:40.000]  I'm not going to get into it now.
[08:40.000 --> 08:41.000]  It's a very complicated topic.
[08:41.000 --> 08:46.000]  Harmon is going to get into what choice of law means and why it is so important
[08:46.000 --> 08:49.000]  concerning the Bernard case and discuss the commercial-related issues
[08:49.000 --> 08:52.000]  and basically has the same conclusion that we do.
[08:52.000 --> 08:54.000]  It's because he used the word dollar,
[08:54.000 --> 08:58.000]  and so Harmon is going to break down the case from his perspective on Friday.
[08:58.000 --> 09:02.000]  One other thing I wanted to mention about this Bernard case,
[09:02.000 --> 09:04.000]  the reason that we're getting into this, people,
[09:04.000 --> 09:10.000]  is not because we are trying to launch a personal attack on Bernard Von Nodhouse.
[09:10.000 --> 09:11.000]  I know the man.
[09:11.000 --> 09:12.000]  I'm sure he meant well.
[09:12.000 --> 09:15.000]  I mean, I don't know him personally, but I'm sure he meant well.
[09:15.000 --> 09:19.000]  By reading his materials, I'm sure he totally meant well.
[09:19.000 --> 09:21.000]  So this is not a personal attack.
[09:21.000 --> 09:26.000]  I know there's a lot of people who are getting very upset about people
[09:26.000 --> 09:29.000]  basically just trying to have an honest discussion about the matter.
[09:29.000 --> 09:32.000]  I know he was a patriot and is a patriot and all that.
[09:32.000 --> 09:35.000]  We're not trying to launch a personal attack on Bernard.
[09:35.000 --> 09:40.000]  We're trying to discuss what's going on from a legitimate perspective,
[09:40.000 --> 09:44.000]  because what's been happening is that the mainstream media
[09:44.000 --> 09:50.000]  and even a lot of alternative media have cited this very inflammatory,
[09:50.000 --> 09:55.000]  just extremely highly emotionally charged,
[09:55.000 --> 10:02.000]  explosive quote by the prosecutor that was made after the verdict was issued
[10:02.000 --> 10:08.000]  by the jury saying, accusing Bernard of being a domestic terrorist
[10:08.000 --> 10:13.000]  and people who deal with alternative systems of barter and silver and this and that
[10:13.000 --> 10:16.000]  are domestic terrorists and all this stuff.
[10:16.000 --> 10:18.000]  I mean, I'll read the quote on Friday.
[10:18.000 --> 10:21.000]  I'm not going to go into it now, but at any rate, the point is,
[10:21.000 --> 10:25.000]  this is a propaganda movement by the government.
[10:25.000 --> 10:32.000]  It's a propaganda push to try to enslave and incite the patriot community
[10:32.000 --> 10:38.000]  into doing something stupid because Bernard got convicted.
[10:38.000 --> 10:43.000]  I've had people tell me that it's over.
[10:43.000 --> 10:46.000]  The government's totally corrupt because of what happened to Bernard.
[10:46.000 --> 10:48.000]  There's nothing that can be done anymore.
[10:48.000 --> 10:49.000]  It's over.
[10:49.000 --> 10:51.000]  It's time to lock and load.
[10:51.000 --> 10:57.000]  I've had people, reasonable people, actually tell me this, and I'm like, no.
[10:57.000 --> 11:00.000]  That's exactly what the government wants us to do right now.
[11:00.000 --> 11:05.000]  So the reason we're discussing this Bernard case is because we're trying to show people
[11:05.000 --> 11:11.000]  legitimately, according to law, why this happened so that people will not be out there
[11:11.000 --> 11:17.000]  thinking it's over, there's no hope, there's no reason for this, it's an attack on silver,
[11:17.000 --> 11:22.000]  Bernard went down for being a domestic terrorist, and just all this, it's just nonsense, people.
[11:22.000 --> 11:23.000]  It's just nonsense.
[11:23.000 --> 11:26.000]  There are legitimate legal reasons why this happened.
[11:26.000 --> 11:28.000]  I went over a lot of it on Friday.
[11:28.000 --> 11:31.000]  We're going to go over some more of it on this coming Friday.
[11:31.000 --> 11:38.000]  But I just wanted to explain that the reason I'm doing this is because I want people to see
[11:38.000 --> 11:45.000]  the legal and lawful reasons why this happened and that it's not a situation of hopelessness
[11:45.000 --> 11:49.000]  and the government is so completely out of control, they just do whatever they want,
[11:49.000 --> 11:54.000]  and because they took down Bernard, then anything can happen, and it's just time to give up.
[11:54.000 --> 11:56.000]  Okay, that's not what's going on.
[11:56.000 --> 12:04.000]  There's a very targeted effort by the government using highly charged emotional,
[12:04.000 --> 12:09.000]  explosive language that is totally off the mark and has nothing to do with the case
[12:09.000 --> 12:14.000]  because they're trying to get people inflamed over this, and so I'm trying to calm people down.
[12:14.000 --> 12:15.000]  So that's what's going on.
[12:15.000 --> 12:18.000]  Anyway, those are the announcements that I have for now.
[12:18.000 --> 12:19.000]  There are a few callers on the board.
[12:19.000 --> 12:21.000]  Callers, we'll get to you in just a moment.
[12:21.000 --> 12:23.000]  Eddie's going to go over some material first.
[12:23.000 --> 12:26.000]  Okay, thanks, Eddie.
[12:26.000 --> 12:27.000]  All right, no problem.
[12:27.000 --> 12:33.000]  Now, a couple of announcements that I've got, and Gene, we do see there on the board,
[12:33.000 --> 12:37.000]  along with another caller that I don't have a name for yet,
[12:37.000 --> 12:39.000]  but we'll get to you folks here in just a second.
[12:39.000 --> 12:42.000]  Let me get these couple of announcements out of the way.
[12:42.000 --> 12:46.000]  Okay, you folks remember that this Wednesday past,
[12:46.000 --> 12:51.000]  I had a meeting with State Representative James White in his office down at the Capitol.
[12:51.000 --> 13:00.000]  His number for his office is 512-463-0490.
[13:00.000 --> 13:04.000]  For those of you out there, please call into his office.
[13:04.000 --> 13:12.000]  Please demand that he see to it that the judicial committee hearing that he talked to me about
[13:12.000 --> 13:17.000]  will be set and scheduled as soon as possible.
[13:17.000 --> 13:23.000]  These issues need to be brought up before these people leave session for the next two years.
[13:23.000 --> 13:25.000]  So please call him.
[13:25.000 --> 13:33.000]  Please let him know that we want this to happen as a people because there are serious issues at stake here.
[13:33.000 --> 13:36.000]  I'm not just somebody that came to visit to grind his own axe.
[13:36.000 --> 13:42.000]  This is an axe that belongs to everybody, and we need him to know it.
[13:42.000 --> 13:50.000]  So please call 512-463-0490, Representative James White,
[13:50.000 --> 13:56.000]  and let them know that you want this hearing with the judicial committee to take place.
[13:56.000 --> 14:02.000]  Also, for those of you in the Austin area or are going to be in the Austin area on the following dates,
[14:02.000 --> 14:12.000]  we are going to have an open intro to the public at Brave New Books on April the 1st and on May the 6th,
[14:12.000 --> 14:17.000]  both starting at 7 p.m. and running until 9 p.m.
[14:17.000 --> 14:22.000]  Basically, I'm just going to introduce you to some of the material and things that we talk about,
[14:22.000 --> 14:28.000]  what we're trying to learn, what we're trying to teach, what we're trying to do with both.
[14:28.000 --> 14:34.000]  So if you want to know what we're doing at Brave New Books and why we're doing it, please come down.
[14:34.000 --> 14:36.000]  There's no charge for these.
[14:36.000 --> 14:41.000]  It's from 7 to 9 on April 1st and May the 6th, okay?
[14:41.000 --> 14:46.000]  Those are Friday nights from 7 to 9.
[14:46.000 --> 14:50.000]  Okay, that being said, I think we've got the announcements out of the way.
[14:50.000 --> 14:55.000]  Deborah, you haven't thought of anything else, have you?
[14:55.000 --> 14:57.000]  I'll take that as a no.
[14:57.000 --> 14:58.000]  I'm sorry.
[14:58.000 --> 15:00.000]  Were you asking me something, Eddie?
[15:00.000 --> 15:01.000]  I was trying to screen call.
[15:01.000 --> 15:06.000]  I was asking you if there was anything else you thought of while I was giving out my information before I started.
[15:06.000 --> 15:07.000]  No, that's all.
[15:07.000 --> 15:08.000]  Go ahead.
[15:08.000 --> 15:09.000]  Go to Sandra first.
[15:09.000 --> 15:10.000]  All right.
[15:10.000 --> 15:11.000]  Okay, great.
[15:11.000 --> 15:14.000]  Okay, we have Sandra, Jean, and Vince on the line.
[15:14.000 --> 15:17.000]  Sandra, what can we do for you?
[15:17.000 --> 15:18.000]  Hi there.
[15:18.000 --> 15:20.000]  About four years ago, I filed a motion to modify.
[15:20.000 --> 15:23.000]  I was trying to regain primary custody of my four minor children,
[15:23.000 --> 15:27.000]  and we had a final hearing in November of 2009, and I failed.
[15:27.000 --> 15:32.000]  My ex became primary custody, and I was ordered to pay child support,
[15:32.000 --> 15:36.000]  and also half of his family's health insurance premium,
[15:36.000 --> 15:39.000]  and half of all the medical bills, which tend to be about $500 per month.
[15:39.000 --> 15:40.000]  That's my share.
[15:40.000 --> 15:42.000]  And at the time, I was on unemployment.
[15:42.000 --> 15:46.000]  I was going to school full-time and had a little side business that brought in about $500 a month.
[15:46.000 --> 15:50.000]  My ex-husband was making somewhere between $200,000 and $300,000 a year,
[15:50.000 --> 15:53.000]  but that was never brought up because I had an awful attorney
[15:53.000 --> 15:56.000]  who didn't do anything for me in the courtroom.
[15:56.000 --> 16:00.000]  So then I filed for a retrial, oh, and also at that hearing.
[16:00.000 --> 16:03.000]  Am I allowed to mention the judge's name or not?
[16:03.000 --> 16:04.000]  Sure.
[16:04.000 --> 16:06.000]  Okay, it was Judge Sines.
[16:06.000 --> 16:08.000]  And also my ex's attorney...
[16:08.000 --> 16:09.000]  Judge Sines.
[16:09.000 --> 16:11.000]  You're in Nacogdoches County.
[16:11.000 --> 16:13.000]  No, I'm in Travis.
[16:13.000 --> 16:14.000]  It was Leonard Sines.
[16:14.000 --> 16:15.000]  You're in Travis.
[16:15.000 --> 16:16.000]  Oh, okay.
[16:16.000 --> 16:17.000]  I'm sorry.
[16:17.000 --> 16:18.000]  We have a Judge Sines in Nacogdoches as well.
[16:18.000 --> 16:19.000]  Oh, I'm sorry.
[16:19.000 --> 16:20.000]  Sorry for that.
[16:20.000 --> 16:21.000]  It's going to be related.
[16:21.000 --> 16:22.000]  Okay.
[16:22.000 --> 16:26.000]  And so the attorney accused me of abusing the pauper's oath.
[16:26.000 --> 16:30.000]  And so the judge said that I'd have to put a $1,000 cash bond down
[16:30.000 --> 16:32.000]  before I could file another pauper's oath,
[16:32.000 --> 16:36.000]  which a person who's poor can't afford to put a $1,000 to pop it down.
[16:36.000 --> 16:37.000]  Right.
[16:37.000 --> 16:38.000]  Okay, hang on, Sandra.
[16:38.000 --> 16:39.000]  We're going to break.
[16:39.000 --> 16:41.000]  I'll pick you up on the other side, okay?
[16:41.000 --> 16:42.000]  So please hang on.
[16:42.000 --> 16:43.000]  All right.
[16:43.000 --> 16:45.000]  All right, folks, we're going to break.
[16:45.000 --> 16:47.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[16:47.000 --> 16:49.000]  Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton.
[16:49.000 --> 16:55.000]  This is Monday night, traffic night, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[16:55.000 --> 16:58.000]  If you have any questions or comments, please give us a call.
[16:58.000 --> 17:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.000 --> 17:03.000]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins,
[17:03.000 --> 17:07.000]  precious metals, and coin supplies in the Austin metro area.
[17:07.000 --> 17:09.000]  We also ship worldwide.
[17:09.000 --> 17:12.000]  We're a family-owned and operated business that offers competitive prices
[17:12.000 --> 17:14.000]  on your coin and metals purchases.
[17:14.000 --> 17:18.000]  Because of you, Austin, business has been so good that we've had to move
[17:18.000 --> 17:20.000]  to a new and bigger location.
[17:20.000 --> 17:24.000]  We're now located at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A,
[17:24.000 --> 17:27.000]  1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous location.
[17:27.000 --> 17:31.000]  We're on the west side of Burnett Road in Stanley Insurance Building
[17:31.000 --> 17:35.000]  on the ground floor next to the Ishuban Sushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[17:35.000 --> 17:39.000]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 5.
[17:39.000 --> 17:41.000]  You're welcome to stop in during regular business hours
[17:41.000 --> 17:45.000]  or call 512-646-6440.
[17:45.000 --> 17:48.000]  Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us
[17:48.000 --> 17:50.000]  on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[17:50.000 --> 17:56.000]  That's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new location at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A
[17:56.000 --> 18:00.000]  or call 512-646-6440.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:13.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors
[18:13.000 --> 18:15.000]  and now you can win two.
[18:15.000 --> 18:19.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court
[18:19.000 --> 18:21.000]  using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:21.000 --> 18:25.000]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons,
[18:25.000 --> 18:27.000]  how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:27.000 --> 18:29.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports,
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:38.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:44.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[18:44.000 --> 18:49.000]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 18:57.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-m at yahoo.com
[18:57.000 --> 19:12.000]  to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:12.000 --> 19:32.000]  All right, folks.
[19:32.000 --> 19:34.000]  We are back, Rule of Law Radio.
[19:34.000 --> 19:36.000]  We must be popular tonight.
[19:36.000 --> 19:38.000]  Our caller board is stacking up.
[19:38.000 --> 19:40.000]  All right, Sandra, please continue.
[19:40.000 --> 19:43.000]  Okay, well, basically, what happened was I found her a new trial,
[19:43.000 --> 19:46.000]  and I was denied, but the new judge, which was Judge Williamson,
[19:46.000 --> 19:50.000]  said that that part about me having $10,000 should be stricken out.
[19:50.000 --> 19:54.000]  So she told the opposing counsel to type up the new orders.
[19:54.000 --> 19:56.000]  Okay, this was in May of 2010.
[19:56.000 --> 20:00.000]  And just now in March of 2011, he finally, because she kept insisting,
[20:00.000 --> 20:02.000]  he finally came up with a set of orders.
[20:02.000 --> 20:05.000]  She had told him that he should present the orders to her,
[20:05.000 --> 20:07.000]  and there would be a hearing where we could discuss it,
[20:07.000 --> 20:09.000]  and then she would possibly sign it.
[20:09.000 --> 20:14.000]  He went to the courthouse over spring break when there was a different attorney in it,
[20:14.000 --> 20:17.000]  I mean, a different judge, and he took me.
[20:17.000 --> 20:22.000]  And so this other judge signed them, not knowing that that wasn't what was ordered.
[20:22.000 --> 20:28.000]  And so I got a certified copy of the mail already signed with no say from me at all in it.
[20:28.000 --> 20:35.000]  So I sent an email to the judge's assistant saying, you know, blah, blah, blah.
[20:35.000 --> 20:36.000]  It wasn't done, right?
[20:36.000 --> 20:39.000]  So I got a letter from the judge saying that we're going to have a hearing on Wednesday.
[20:39.000 --> 20:46.000]  And okay, so I'm trying to get this mess cleared up because I can't afford to pay any child support
[20:46.000 --> 20:50.000]  and still have a roof over my head, and it's not going to be good for the best interest of the children,
[20:50.000 --> 20:52.000]  for their mom to be homeless, living in a shelter.
[20:52.000 --> 20:58.000]  And I don't have a job because I basically stayed home and homeschooled the children
[20:58.000 --> 21:01.000]  and raised the children and put him through school, and that's why he's making the big bucks.
[21:01.000 --> 21:04.000]  And I'm making nothing.
[21:04.000 --> 21:07.000]  I can't even get the job because I have no credentials.
[21:07.000 --> 21:08.000]  I'm going to school.
[21:08.000 --> 21:10.000]  I'm actually an honors student at ACC.
[21:10.000 --> 21:15.000]  But I don't have any money, and I can't pay the child support.
[21:15.000 --> 21:17.000]  And so that's one thing I'd like to get clarified.
[21:17.000 --> 21:23.000]  But also, back six months ago as of tomorrow, one of my daughters, she ran away,
[21:23.000 --> 21:25.000]  and she came to live with me.
[21:25.000 --> 21:27.000]  Am I still on the line?
[21:27.000 --> 21:28.000]  Yeah, go ahead.
[21:28.000 --> 21:29.000]  Okay, sorry.
[21:29.000 --> 21:32.000]  And she came to live with me, and it's been six months as of tomorrow.
[21:32.000 --> 21:37.000]  And I filed with the attorney general trying to get child support for her,
[21:37.000 --> 21:39.000]  but I don't have any money to hire an attorney.
[21:39.000 --> 21:41.000]  And I feel like every time I go to court, I get screwed.
[21:41.000 --> 21:51.000]  And so when I go to this hearing on Wednesday, I feel like the whole order should be vacated
[21:51.000 --> 21:56.000]  because it no longer applies because why should I be paying for three children,
[21:56.000 --> 21:59.000]  child support for three children when one of those children now lives with me
[21:59.000 --> 22:01.000]  and has for the past six months?
[22:01.000 --> 22:04.000]  I'm going to get there, and she's going to say, well, you'll have to file.
[22:04.000 --> 22:08.000]  You'll have to wait a year, or you'll have to start all over.
[22:08.000 --> 22:12.000]  I feel like an attorney told me that if he was going to represent me,
[22:12.000 --> 22:14.000]  which I couldn't do that because I didn't have any money,
[22:14.000 --> 22:19.000]  he said that he would ask demand or whatever that the orders be vacated,
[22:19.000 --> 22:22.000]  and we start all over.
[22:22.000 --> 22:24.000]  And if they were vacated, I don't know what that means about the back child support
[22:24.000 --> 22:26.000]  because I haven't been able to pay it.
[22:26.000 --> 22:30.000]  And so I got this thing over my head going, I could go to jail for not paying child support
[22:30.000 --> 22:34.000]  because I can't afford to pay it, and it's a mess.
[22:34.000 --> 22:36.000]  Okay.
[22:36.000 --> 22:39.000]  So what exactly is your question on it?
[22:39.000 --> 22:43.000]  My question is, do I have a legal right to ask that those orders be vacated
[22:43.000 --> 22:48.000]  because he dawdled around so long getting them typed up and presented to the court?
[22:48.000 --> 22:56.000]  Not only should you ask that they be vacated, but you should also file a motion for sanctions
[22:56.000 --> 23:03.000]  because he attempted to circumvent the judge that was actually presiding over the case,
[23:03.000 --> 23:07.000]  knowing full well he was probably not going to get what he wanted
[23:07.000 --> 23:10.000]  if he submitted the order that he did.
[23:10.000 --> 23:14.000]  For instance, were the things that she told him to strike out of the order still in it
[23:14.000 --> 23:16.000]  when he got them signed?
[23:16.000 --> 23:17.000]  No, that was struck out.
[23:17.000 --> 23:19.000]  But he's dawdling because he knows I have to wait a year
[23:19.000 --> 23:21.000]  from when the final orders are signed.
[23:21.000 --> 23:24.000]  And he's been doing this every step of the way.
[23:24.000 --> 23:26.000]  He dawdles around and he keeps coming up with excuses
[23:26.000 --> 23:28.000]  why we can't see it in front of a reasonable judge.
[23:28.000 --> 23:33.000]  He won't let the hearing go ahead proceed until we get the judge that he wants,
[23:33.000 --> 23:36.000]  which was Leonard Stein.
[23:36.000 --> 23:39.000]  I was in front of Don Hancock several times, a reasonable judge,
[23:39.000 --> 23:43.000]  but every time he would come up with some tiddly thing that he accused me of doing wrong,
[23:43.000 --> 23:44.000]  which I didn't do wrong.
[23:44.000 --> 23:45.000]  It was correctly done.
[23:45.000 --> 23:48.000]  But he kept doing it until he got the judge he wanted.
[23:48.000 --> 23:53.000]  And so you're saying I should file a motion to vacate and a motion?
[23:53.000 --> 23:58.000]  A motion for sanctions against the other attorney for abusing the process
[23:58.000 --> 24:01.000]  in an effort to control the outcome of the case
[24:01.000 --> 24:06.000]  by getting the judge that he wants is what you're getting at.
[24:06.000 --> 24:09.000]  So he's manipulating the system to his own ends.
[24:09.000 --> 24:17.000]  Now, the other thing is when he said that you were abusing the indigency phase of this,
[24:17.000 --> 24:22.000]  what evidence did he produce to refute your indigency?
[24:22.000 --> 24:23.000]  Nothing.
[24:23.000 --> 24:24.000]  He just said it.
[24:24.000 --> 24:28.000]  I'm telling you, this judge is awful.
[24:28.000 --> 24:32.000]  Then you also need to file judicial conduct complaints against that judge.
[24:32.000 --> 24:37.000]  Any time he tries to put you in front of a judge that has done something
[24:37.000 --> 24:41.000]  that is not in accordance with law on the subject,
[24:41.000 --> 24:45.000]  you need to file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge
[24:45.000 --> 24:49.000]  and a bar grievance against that attorney.
[24:49.000 --> 24:52.000]  Well, you know what I have done on bar grievances against attorneys before,
[24:52.000 --> 24:56.000]  and I feel like the state of text is very corrupt because one time...
[24:56.000 --> 24:59.000]  Well, you're absolutely right, but you need to do it anyway.
[24:59.000 --> 25:03.000]  I've done it three times, and one time it was totally obvious
[25:03.000 --> 25:05.000]  that the guy should have been disbarred.
[25:05.000 --> 25:07.000]  It was Stephen Kopenhaver.
[25:07.000 --> 25:10.000]  He was assigned by Suzanne Brooks to represent me and represent my children
[25:10.000 --> 25:14.000]  when I first lost, you know, in the first custody case where I lost custody
[25:14.000 --> 25:16.000]  because of Stephen Kopenhaver's testimony.
[25:16.000 --> 25:19.000]  Stephen, I don't know if you're not from Austin. You may not have heard about this.
[25:19.000 --> 25:22.000]  Oh, wait. His testimony. What do you mean, his testimony?
[25:22.000 --> 25:24.000]  Well, he was a guardian ad litem.
[25:24.000 --> 25:26.000]  I didn't know anything about his past.
[25:26.000 --> 25:30.000]  I didn't know that he was out on bail for sexually propositioning,
[25:30.000 --> 25:35.000]  for soliciting sex and prostitution of a female client who came to him.
[25:35.000 --> 25:37.000]  While he was out, he was arrested.
[25:37.000 --> 25:39.000]  But while he was out on bail, Suzanne Brooks signed the papers
[25:39.000 --> 25:42.000]  making him the guardian ad litem for my five children.
[25:42.000 --> 25:44.000]  I had five minor children at the time,
[25:44.000 --> 25:46.000]  and he hit on me every occasion when we were alone,
[25:46.000 --> 25:49.000]  and there were no witnesses. He hit on me repeatedly.
[25:49.000 --> 25:58.000]  And then when I didn't pick him up on his rotations and what he was getting at,
[25:58.000 --> 26:00.000]  I showed up to court at the final hearing,
[26:00.000 --> 26:03.000]  and he wrote up a bad report saying that my kids were flunking school,
[26:03.000 --> 26:06.000]  which was not true. They were getting As and Bs,
[26:06.000 --> 26:09.000]  saying that all sorts of ridiculous things,
[26:09.000 --> 26:13.000]  not that I was abusing drugs or doing anything wrong like that,
[26:13.000 --> 26:15.000]  but just that I had my house for sale.
[26:15.000 --> 26:17.000]  Yeah, my house was for sale because it was in foreclosure
[26:17.000 --> 26:20.000]  because I was paying an attorney instead of paying my house payment.
[26:20.000 --> 26:22.000]  Just ridiculous things.
[26:22.000 --> 26:27.000]  And it was so obvious that it was because I hadn't accepted –
[26:27.000 --> 26:29.000]  I don't know what the terminology is.
[26:29.000 --> 26:31.000]  I hadn't gone along with his sexual innuendos.
[26:31.000 --> 26:34.000]  Sandra, next time something like this happens,
[26:34.000 --> 26:38.000]  you need to have a personal recorder on you and record these interchanges
[26:38.000 --> 26:40.000]  so that you can have proof of this.
[26:40.000 --> 26:42.000]  I know it. I know.
[26:42.000 --> 26:47.000]  Yeah, don't ever go into another public anything
[26:47.000 --> 26:50.000]  if you're not carrying a recording device on you.
[26:50.000 --> 26:53.000]  Don't do it.
[26:53.000 --> 27:00.000]  I don't care who you're talking to, have that thing on and recording.
[27:00.000 --> 27:03.000]  This is the kind of stuff I keep trying to get people to understand.
[27:03.000 --> 27:09.000]  We are no longer in an age of anybody being trustworthy enough in the public sector
[27:09.000 --> 27:13.000]  for you to let your life be torn apart on their word alone
[27:13.000 --> 27:19.000]  because most of them are more than willing to show you their word is not worth spit.
[27:19.000 --> 27:21.000]  Right.
[27:21.000 --> 27:26.000]  Now, what you're getting into here, Sandra, is kind of a complicated deal,
[27:26.000 --> 27:32.000]  and I don't know how much of this that me or Randy can help you with in this short venue.
[27:32.000 --> 27:35.000]  So what I would like for you to do, if you do not mind, please,
[27:35.000 --> 27:40.000]  is to get me some details on this, write it up if you haven't already.
[27:40.000 --> 27:44.000]  I need this in writing so I know what happened and when.
[27:44.000 --> 27:45.000]  Okay.
[27:45.000 --> 27:48.000]  Okay, and who the actors were.
[27:48.000 --> 27:52.000]  So if you will please send me a contact email offline,
[27:52.000 --> 27:57.000]  I will be more than happy to send you a chronology template that will let,
[27:57.000 --> 28:00.000]  it's basically a journal entry.
[28:00.000 --> 28:06.000]  Every time something in your case happens, you make an entry using this template
[28:06.000 --> 28:10.000]  so that you can keep the facts and the players straight.
[28:10.000 --> 28:11.000]  Okay?
[28:11.000 --> 28:12.000]  Okay.
[28:12.000 --> 28:16.000]  That also gives you something to give to someone like me or an attorney
[28:16.000 --> 28:19.000]  should you be able to get one sometime down the line.
[28:19.000 --> 28:24.000]  They will have something to look at that will bring them up to speed.
[28:24.000 --> 28:30.000]  Okay.
[28:30.000 --> 28:31.000]  Make sure you do that.
[28:31.000 --> 28:33.000]  If you do have it, please send it to me.
[28:33.000 --> 28:34.000]  I will.
[28:34.000 --> 28:35.000]  Okay.
[28:35.000 --> 28:36.000]  Okay.
[28:36.000 --> 28:37.000]  Thank you very much.
[28:37.000 --> 28:38.000]  You're welcome.
[28:38.000 --> 28:44.000]  I will go through that and I will make whatever recommendations I can to you
[28:44.000 --> 28:46.000]  as quickly as I can, okay?
[28:46.000 --> 28:47.000]  Okay.
[28:47.000 --> 28:48.000]  I'll take care of that right away.
[28:48.000 --> 28:49.000]  Thank you so very much.
[28:49.000 --> 28:51.000]  You're very welcome.
[28:51.000 --> 28:55.000]  And also, Sandra, you may want to consider making these trips down to Brave New
[28:55.000 --> 29:01.000]  Books because one of the things we do is teach you what to do and say in court
[29:01.000 --> 29:05.000]  when you're faced with particular situations.
[29:05.000 --> 29:06.000]  Yes.
[29:06.000 --> 29:08.000]  Well, I didn't know that that existed until today.
[29:08.000 --> 29:11.000]  A friend told me about your radio program and he told me that on weekends
[29:11.000 --> 29:15.000]  you have Brave New Books and I, fortunately, there's no weekend between now
[29:15.000 --> 29:19.000]  and Wednesday, but I will definitely come this coming weekend.
[29:19.000 --> 29:20.000]  Okay.
[29:20.000 --> 29:21.000]  Well, we hope to see you there.
[29:21.000 --> 29:22.000]  Thank you.
[29:22.000 --> 29:23.000]  All right.
[29:23.000 --> 29:24.000]  Bye-bye.
[29:24.000 --> 29:25.000]  You're welcome.
[29:25.000 --> 29:26.000]  Thank you.
[29:26.000 --> 29:27.000]  Okay.
[29:27.000 --> 29:30.000]  Next up is Vince in California.
[29:30.000 --> 29:32.000]  Vince, what can we do for you?
[29:32.000 --> 29:33.000]  Hey, good evening.
[29:33.000 --> 29:34.000]  Oh, there's the music.
[29:34.000 --> 29:35.000]  Oh, man, that was quick.
[29:35.000 --> 29:36.000]  All right.
[29:36.000 --> 29:37.000]  Okay.
[29:37.000 --> 29:38.000]  We're about to go to break.
[29:38.000 --> 29:41.000]  So, Vince, if you'll hang on, I'll pick you up on the other side.
[29:41.000 --> 29:45.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Eddie Craig, Debra Stevens, Randy Kelton.
[29:45.000 --> 29:50.000]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[29:50.000 --> 29:54.000]  If you have any questions, comments, or just something worth knowing about,
[29:54.000 --> 29:55.000]  give us a call.
[29:55.000 --> 29:57.000]  We'll see you on the other side of the break.
[29:57.000 --> 30:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[30:00.000 --> 30:04.000]  The Rule of Law Radio Network is proud to present a due process of law seminar
[30:04.000 --> 30:06.000]  hosted by our own Eddie Craig.
[30:06.000 --> 30:09.000]  Eddie is a former Nacogdoches County Sheriff's Deputy,
[30:09.000 --> 30:12.000]  and for the past 21 years he has studied the due process of law
[30:12.000 --> 30:15.000]  and now offers his knowledge to you at a law seminar every Saturday
[30:15.000 --> 30:18.000]  from 3 o'clock to 6 o'clock at Brave New Books,
[30:18.000 --> 30:21.000]  located at 1904 Guadalupe Street in Austin, Texas.
[30:21.000 --> 30:25.000]  Admission is $20, so please make plans to come and sit with Eddie
[30:25.000 --> 30:30.000]  and learn for yourself what the true intent of law really is.
[30:30.000 --> 30:34.000]  Should U.S. Postal Service mail trucks become government spy mobiles?
[30:34.000 --> 30:37.000]  One high-ranking attorney with the Postal Regulatory Commission
[30:37.000 --> 30:39.000]  thinks it's a great idea.
[30:39.000 --> 30:43.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albert, and I'll be back with the Orwellian Postal Proposal
[30:43.000 --> 30:44.000]  in just a moment.
[30:44.000 --> 30:48.000]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches
[30:48.000 --> 30:51.000]  and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[30:51.000 --> 30:52.000]  That's creepy.
[30:52.000 --> 30:54.000]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:54.000 --> 30:57.000]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:57.000 --> 31:01.000]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches,
[31:01.000 --> 31:04.000]  or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[31:04.000 --> 31:08.000]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[31:08.000 --> 31:11.000]  Great search results and total privacy.
[31:11.000 --> 31:14.000]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:14.000 --> 31:17.000]  The U.S. Postal Service is in financial trouble,
[31:17.000 --> 31:20.000]  but a senior postal official thinks he has the answer,
[31:20.000 --> 31:22.000]  selling postal surveillance services.
[31:22.000 --> 31:26.000]  Chief Counsel Michael Ravnitsky believes equipping mail delivery trucks
[31:26.000 --> 31:29.000]  with high-tech snooping equipment could be quite profitable.
[31:29.000 --> 31:32.000]  He wants onboard cameras to take Google-esque snapshots
[31:32.000 --> 31:35.000]  of the 4 million miles of city streets and rural roads
[31:35.000 --> 31:37.000]  that postal workers drive every day.
[31:37.000 --> 31:41.000]  He also wants invasive sensors to map private communication signals,
[31:41.000 --> 31:43.000]  scan the environment for biohazards,
[31:43.000 --> 31:46.000]  and monitor citizens' home-based activities.
[31:46.000 --> 31:49.000]  The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects us
[31:49.000 --> 31:51.000]  from this kind of unreasonable search and seizure.
[31:51.000 --> 31:54.000]  Join me in opposing this invasive scheme.
[31:54.000 --> 31:55.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:55.000 --> 31:59.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:59.000 --> 32:01.000]  Thank you.
[32:29.000 --> 32:31.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[32:31.000 --> 32:32.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio,
[32:32.000 --> 32:35.000]  and right now we are talking to Vince in California.
[32:35.000 --> 32:38.000]  We see Eugene, Mitchell, and Jim.
[32:38.000 --> 32:39.000]  Y'all hang in there.
[32:39.000 --> 32:41.000]  We have several other people drop off the line.
[32:41.000 --> 32:43.000]  Folks, please give us a call back.
[32:43.000 --> 32:45.000]  We'll get to you just as quick as we can.
[32:45.000 --> 32:47.000]  All right, Vince, go ahead, please.
[32:47.000 --> 32:49.000]  Hey, it's a good thing that music came up,
[32:49.000 --> 32:51.000]  because I thought there was another caller ahead of me,
[32:51.000 --> 32:53.000]  and I had a mouthful of food.
[32:53.000 --> 32:54.000]  Well, that's all right.
[32:54.000 --> 32:55.000]  I won't hold that against you.
[32:55.000 --> 32:57.000]  Yeah, do we know how Catherine Albrecht's doing?
[32:57.000 --> 32:59.000]  I heard that commercial, and it made me think of her.
[32:59.000 --> 33:03.000]  Well, yeah, she's on the air again.
[33:03.000 --> 33:05.000]  Oh, I'm going to have to listen to her show.
[33:05.000 --> 33:09.000]  Yeah, she had her surgery, and for now she's okay,
[33:09.000 --> 33:13.000]  but I believe she said that she has to go through chemo.
[33:13.000 --> 33:18.000]  They were concerned for a while that the cancer had gone systemic,
[33:18.000 --> 33:21.000]  and they didn't know really if she was going to be
[33:21.000 --> 33:23.000]  a terminal patient or not.
[33:23.000 --> 33:25.000]  And I believe, don't hold me to this,
[33:25.000 --> 33:28.000]  but I believe the tests came back, that they managed to stop it.
[33:28.000 --> 33:30.000]  It had already gotten into her lymphatic system,
[33:30.000 --> 33:32.000]  but they removed some of her lymph nodes,
[33:32.000 --> 33:34.000]  and they believe they have stopped it,
[33:34.000 --> 33:37.000]  because otherwise once it gets throughout in your body,
[33:37.000 --> 33:39.000]  you're pretty much toast.
[33:39.000 --> 33:41.000]  I mean, you get brain cancer, you get bone cancer.
[33:41.000 --> 33:43.000]  There's nothing that can be done.
[33:43.000 --> 33:46.000]  But I'm pretty sure that that did not happen.
[33:46.000 --> 33:48.000]  They caught it in time,
[33:48.000 --> 33:50.000]  but I believe she still is going to be going through chemo
[33:50.000 --> 33:51.000]  and stuff like that.
[33:51.000 --> 33:53.000]  So you may want to listen to her show and call into her.
[33:53.000 --> 33:55.000]  I will, and I'm going to pray for her.
[33:55.000 --> 33:56.000]  She's such a sweetheart.
[33:56.000 --> 33:58.000]  Absolutely.
[33:58.000 --> 34:01.000]  Hey, Eddie, have you ever heard or familiar with the Joe Edwards
[34:01.000 --> 34:07.000]  case that these guys, they had him on the show a couple years ago?
[34:07.000 --> 34:08.000]  I've heard of it.
[34:08.000 --> 34:12.000]  I'm not intimate with the details of it.
[34:12.000 --> 34:13.000]  Wow, you should go to the,
[34:13.000 --> 34:17.000]  I'm sure Deborah can point you right to the archives of that,
[34:17.000 --> 34:20.000]  but I've been listening to that over and over ever for the last two years.
[34:20.000 --> 34:24.000]  Well, you may want to point him to where the archives are on that,
[34:24.000 --> 34:26.000]  because no, I could not.
[34:26.000 --> 34:27.000]  Oh, okay.
[34:27.000 --> 34:32.000]  I can barely even do bare bones documentation of the archives
[34:32.000 --> 34:33.000]  even when we have guests.
[34:33.000 --> 34:36.000]  I rely on the listeners to document the archives.
[34:36.000 --> 34:40.000]  I've set up the archive page as a WordPress blog,
[34:40.000 --> 34:44.000]  and the archive postings are actual blog posts.
[34:44.000 --> 34:46.000]  And so I rely on the listeners,
[34:46.000 --> 34:51.000]  and I need the listeners to document the archives and describe them
[34:51.000 --> 34:54.000]  and post your descriptions as comments.
[34:54.000 --> 34:55.000]  Right, right.
[34:55.000 --> 34:57.000]  And so no, I have no idea.
[34:57.000 --> 35:02.000]  There is an RSS feed of the comments, and I believe that is searchable.
[35:02.000 --> 35:06.000]  Now, there is a search function on the WordPress blog page,
[35:06.000 --> 35:11.000]  but it only searches the text of the blog posts themselves, I think.
[35:11.000 --> 35:19.000]  I'm going to be working with my server admin to try to update the version of WordPress,
[35:19.000 --> 35:22.000]  so hopefully there will be a search function on there soon
[35:22.000 --> 35:25.000]  where you can actually search the comments as well.
[35:25.000 --> 35:29.000]  But I believe it's documented.
[35:29.000 --> 35:32.000]  The name Joe Edwards is documented in the blog post itself,
[35:32.000 --> 35:36.000]  so if you do a search for Joe Edwards, you'll be able to find it, hopefully.
[35:36.000 --> 35:39.000]  But I do need help from the listeners.
[35:39.000 --> 35:41.000]  I need to solicit the listeners' help more,
[35:41.000 --> 35:43.000]  because there's no way that I can document the archives.
[35:43.000 --> 35:45.000]  I mean, I can't sit here and take notes
[35:45.000 --> 35:49.000]  and write down all the caller's names and what their questions are
[35:49.000 --> 35:52.000]  and all these things while I'm on the air and producing a show at the same time.
[35:52.000 --> 35:54.000]  So I need help from the listeners.
[35:54.000 --> 35:55.000]  Yeah.
[35:55.000 --> 35:58.000]  You know, I've started building websites for a living,
[35:58.000 --> 36:02.000]  and gosh, if I can just get ahead enough, I'd love to donate some time.
[36:02.000 --> 36:05.000]  And I think the Joe Edwards stuff goes back to WTPRN days.
[36:05.000 --> 36:06.000]  In fact, I'm sure it does.
[36:06.000 --> 36:10.000]  I remember getting nostalgic when I heard the music and the bumpers and all that.
[36:10.000 --> 36:11.000]  It could be.
[36:11.000 --> 36:15.000]  And if it is, why don't you let the listeners know what date that is,
[36:15.000 --> 36:17.000]  if you've got the archive?
[36:17.000 --> 36:18.000]  Yeah, you know, I'll do that.
[36:18.000 --> 36:19.000]  I'll pull it up right now.
[36:19.000 --> 36:23.000]  But in the meantime, I'll try to multitask so I'm not burning up air time.
[36:23.000 --> 36:27.000]  But yeah, Eddie, what he did was just mind-bending.
[36:27.000 --> 36:34.000]  I mean, the way he melded commercial and statutory law through UCC 1-103
[36:34.000 --> 36:37.000]  and I guess there are, and I've looked this up in California,
[36:37.000 --> 36:41.000]  there are statutes that mirror that UCC code.
[36:41.000 --> 36:46.000]  Just the stuff he did, God, I've just listened to it over and over,
[36:46.000 --> 36:48.000]  and it's pretty powerful.
[36:48.000 --> 36:51.000]  But anyway, if you guys remember, I called in last Friday.
[36:51.000 --> 36:57.000]  I had gotten pulled over for no license registration, blah, blah, blah.
[36:57.000 --> 37:00.000]  And I had handed the policeman a notice,
[37:00.000 --> 37:04.000]  which I emailed you guys last Friday right before the show.
[37:04.000 --> 37:10.000]  I don't know if you guys read it, but when I went into court, the case was gone.
[37:10.000 --> 37:12.000]  And I have a feeling that after reading that notice,
[37:12.000 --> 37:17.000]  he decided not to do anything about it and didn't even put it through the system.
[37:17.000 --> 37:22.000]  And that was kind of cool, but now I'm stuck with, well, not stuck with,
[37:22.000 --> 37:25.000]  I was kind of excited to go into court and try to fight this.
[37:25.000 --> 37:31.000]  But now I have the situation where the towing company has towed my car with no ticket on file,
[37:31.000 --> 37:33.000]  and you guys said I could go after the towing company,
[37:33.000 --> 37:35.000]  and I'm thinking, what, tort letter or what?
[37:35.000 --> 37:36.000]  Where should I start?
[37:36.000 --> 37:37.000]  What do you think?
[37:37.000 --> 37:39.000]  Yeah, I would.
[37:39.000 --> 37:44.000]  And actually, you can give them a chance to return the car at no charge,
[37:44.000 --> 37:47.000]  or you have the option of just suing them outright.
[37:47.000 --> 37:50.000]  A tort letter is just a courtesy.
[37:50.000 --> 37:53.000]  It's not a requirement in the case of somebody like a tow company.
[37:53.000 --> 37:56.000]  Sure.
[37:56.000 --> 37:57.000]  Well, I have the car back.
[37:57.000 --> 37:59.000]  This happened in January.
[37:59.000 --> 38:00.000]  So I got the car back.
[38:00.000 --> 38:02.000]  Right, but you paid for it, right?
[38:02.000 --> 38:06.000]  But I did pay for it, so I want to go after them for the money.
[38:06.000 --> 38:10.000]  So I should just start with a letter, I suppose.
[38:10.000 --> 38:12.000]  Right?
[38:12.000 --> 38:17.000]  Yeah, you can tell them that, well, no, you could just sue them outright for recovery of the money.
[38:17.000 --> 38:18.000]  Right.
[38:18.000 --> 38:23.000]  And just accuse them of stealing your car in conspiratorial concert
[38:23.000 --> 38:27.000]  with whatever officer told them to do it.
[38:27.000 --> 38:30.000]  Yeah, I don't know.
[38:30.000 --> 38:34.000]  I can envision, okay, first of all, it will probably go through small claims.
[38:34.000 --> 38:35.000]  It's 500 bucks.
[38:35.000 --> 38:36.000]  It depends on how much it is.
[38:36.000 --> 38:39.000]  It's 500 bucks.
[38:39.000 --> 38:42.000]  And you're going to sue them just for the 500 bucks?
[38:42.000 --> 38:45.000]  Well, I would imagine I'd go for triple.
[38:45.000 --> 38:46.000]  At least.
[38:46.000 --> 38:50.000]  But you can go up 10K here in Texas, even though, constitutionally speaking,
[38:50.000 --> 38:53.000]  I still don't think that's viable.
[38:53.000 --> 38:54.000]  Yeah, okay.
[38:54.000 --> 39:04.000]  Well, in California, I think it's, I can't remember if it's 7,500 or 12,500 or what.
[39:04.000 --> 39:11.000]  Okay, so I would imagine my angle would be that, hey, you guys towed my car.
[39:11.000 --> 39:12.000]  Why?
[39:12.000 --> 39:13.000]  I mean, I almost kind of have to play dumb.
[39:13.000 --> 39:19.000]  Well, what I would do is this, I would accuse them of having a ransoming,
[39:19.000 --> 39:26.000]  automobile ransom ring with the police department where they actually go in
[39:26.000 --> 39:32.000]  and the police call them to come steal the car under some presumed authority,
[39:32.000 --> 39:37.000]  charge the money, and they pay kickbacks to the cops later.
[39:37.000 --> 39:45.000]  Well, isn't that going, that seems like I'm kind of reaching or, you know,
[39:45.000 --> 39:49.000]  accusing them of something that I have no evidence for.
[39:49.000 --> 39:51.000]  Well, will that really matter if they want to drop it
[39:51.000 --> 39:53.000]  and settle to get it out of their hair?
[39:53.000 --> 39:57.000]  Or are you thinking that going that far with it right off the bat
[39:57.000 --> 39:58.000]  will give me a lot of leverage?
[39:58.000 --> 40:00.000]  Is that what you're thinking?
[40:00.000 --> 40:05.000]  Well, I'm thinking somebody having to clean out their shorts at a rapid rate
[40:05.000 --> 40:08.000]  is tending to be more responsive to certain things
[40:08.000 --> 40:11.000]  than one who thinks they've got everything in control.
[40:11.000 --> 40:13.000]  Yeah, yeah.
[40:13.000 --> 40:18.000]  Now, when you point out the little thing that there is no record of this ticket
[40:18.000 --> 40:24.000]  ever being filed with a court, which is evidence that the officer never filed it,
[40:24.000 --> 40:29.000]  yet the officer called you to assist in the taking of my property.
[40:29.000 --> 40:35.000]  So if this is not a criminal conspiracy, why wasn't the ticket filed?
[40:35.000 --> 40:39.000]  Why isn't there a record of it in the court?
[40:39.000 --> 40:42.000]  Right, so this is kind of the crux of my question is,
[40:42.000 --> 40:48.000]  should I bring up with them initially that there even was a ticket or not?
[40:48.000 --> 40:51.000]  Well, you've got to bring up the premise that, allegedly,
[40:51.000 --> 40:54.000]  that's the authority they had for taking the car.
[40:54.000 --> 40:55.000]  Right, right.
[40:55.000 --> 41:00.000]  You're accusing them of conspiring with the cops just to make that appearance
[41:00.000 --> 41:05.000]  so you would pay the money, because there is no ticket in the court.
[41:05.000 --> 41:08.000]  There is no case.
[41:08.000 --> 41:09.000]  You see what I'm saying?
[41:09.000 --> 41:13.000]  Sure, sure, okay.
[41:13.000 --> 41:16.000]  Okay, yeah, well, that gives me an angle to work with,
[41:16.000 --> 41:23.000]  and I think I'll start with a nice, friendly letter, spelling those things out.
[41:23.000 --> 41:25.000]  Yeah, well, that's what I would work on right there,
[41:25.000 --> 41:31.000]  because that alone gives you a prima facie case that this was set up
[41:31.000 --> 41:37.000]  to work this way on purpose, proving it's not really the point.
[41:37.000 --> 41:38.000]  Right.
[41:38.000 --> 41:40.000]  Now, what about going after the cop?
[41:40.000 --> 41:43.000]  Is there any...
[41:43.000 --> 41:47.000]  Sure, the cop conspired with them.
[41:47.000 --> 41:51.000]  Should I try to bring him into the situation in his personal capacity?
[41:51.000 --> 41:54.000]  Absolutely.
[41:54.000 --> 41:56.000]  Acting under color of law.
[41:56.000 --> 41:59.000]  Right, because as soon as there's no case, no ticket,
[41:59.000 --> 42:05.000]  then he was acting outside of his duties.
[42:05.000 --> 42:06.000]  Right.
[42:06.000 --> 42:08.000]  Now, here's the one thing that you're going to run into.
[42:08.000 --> 42:12.000]  If you get him in enough hot water, he's going to go crying to somebody,
[42:12.000 --> 42:17.000]  and they may do something to cover his backside, so be aware of that.
[42:17.000 --> 42:19.000]  Right, like dig up the ticket and say,
[42:19.000 --> 42:22.000]  oh, after all, we're creating the case after all.
[42:22.000 --> 42:27.000]  That's kind of what I was thinking, too, so I didn't know if I wanted to go that route.
[42:27.000 --> 42:29.000]  I think I'd rather just go after the towing company.
[42:29.000 --> 42:32.000]  This guy, he admitted to me, it was really funny,
[42:32.000 --> 42:35.000]  I rolled my window down about an inch, and I passed the letter through the crack,
[42:35.000 --> 42:41.000]  and I read about two lines of it, which included that he was being filmed,
[42:41.000 --> 42:43.000]  and he said, what's this?
[42:43.000 --> 42:45.000]  And I said, well, read it.
[42:45.000 --> 42:47.000]  And he said, well, I don't know what to do with this.
[42:47.000 --> 42:52.000]  I'm new on the job or something like that, which was really dumb of him to say to me.
[42:52.000 --> 43:00.000]  But I have a feeling that it ended up being three cop cars there, six officers.
[43:00.000 --> 43:02.000]  They all called for backup.
[43:02.000 --> 43:05.000]  They thought I was one of these domestic terrorists.
[43:05.000 --> 43:11.000]  And by the end of the evening, I had gotten them in a conversation
[43:11.000 --> 43:14.000]  about how restricting the right to travel was one of the first things
[43:14.000 --> 43:18.000]  that every repressive regime on earth has done.
[43:18.000 --> 43:23.000]  I think some of them got the message and probably gave him some advice to,
[43:23.000 --> 43:28.000]  hey, you're kind of new, maybe you shouldn't even turn this ticket in.
[43:28.000 --> 43:31.000]  You're going to have to argue this in court one way or the other.
[43:31.000 --> 43:35.000]  Yeah, but I don't know that I want to go after him.
[43:35.000 --> 43:39.000]  Okay, well, that call is yours, but that's a recommendation I've got on it.
[43:39.000 --> 43:44.000]  Okay, if you want to hold me over, I had one other real quick thing.
[43:44.000 --> 43:46.000]  Okay, I'll see you on the other side of the break.
[43:46.000 --> 43:51.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio 512-646-1984.
[43:51.000 --> 43:53.000]  Gene, Mitchell, Jim, we see you on the board.
[43:53.000 --> 43:54.000]  Please hang on.
[43:54.000 --> 43:56.000]  We'll get to you on the other side of the break.
[43:56.000 --> 43:57.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[43:57.000 --> 44:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:00.000 --> 44:03.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM,
[44:03.000 --> 44:06.000]  but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy,
[44:06.000 --> 44:09.000]  and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[44:09.000 --> 44:12.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[44:12.000 --> 44:13.000]  Brave New Books?
[44:13.000 --> 44:16.000]  Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for
[44:16.000 --> 44:20.000]  by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[44:20.000 --> 44:24.000]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[44:24.000 --> 44:26.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[44:26.000 --> 44:28.000]  Go check it out for yourself.
[44:28.000 --> 44:32.000]  It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street just south of UT.
[44:32.000 --> 44:35.000]  By UT, there's never anywhere to park down there.
[44:35.000 --> 44:38.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking
[44:38.000 --> 44:41.000]  for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility
[44:41.000 --> 44:43.000]  just behind the bookstore.
[44:43.000 --> 44:46.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[44:46.000 --> 44:51.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM, and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays.
[44:51.000 --> 44:55.000]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503,
[44:55.000 --> 45:05.000]  or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[45:25.000 --> 45:28.000]  In conjunction with the science of modern nutrition,
[45:28.000 --> 45:31.000]  adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component,
[45:31.000 --> 45:35.000]  and organic hemp protein in greens and superfoods
[45:35.000 --> 45:38.000]  act as a balanced nutrient base.
[45:38.000 --> 45:42.000]  Plus, chintrician tastes great in just water.
[45:42.000 --> 45:45.000]  This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product,
[45:45.000 --> 45:47.000]  and it's all natural.
[45:47.000 --> 45:56.000]  Visit chintrician.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436.
[45:56.000 --> 46:01.000]  After you use chintrician, you'll believe in supplements again.
[46:01.000 --> 46:17.000] ??
[46:17.000 --> 46:22.000] ? If you could not wait any longer??
[46:22.000 --> 46:27.000] ??
[46:27.000 --> 46:46.000]  All right, folks, we are back. We're going to finish up with Vince in California. Gene,
[46:46.000 --> 46:49.000]  Mitchell, and Jim, hang in there. We'll be with you in just a moment. All right, Vince,
[46:49.000 --> 46:50.000]  go ahead.
[46:50.000 --> 46:57.000]  Okay. I just wanted to say that Joe Edwards stuff is still available on the web. The WTPRN
[46:57.000 --> 47:03.000]  website is still up. It's WTPRN.com. If you go to archives on the left, then rule of law
[47:03.000 --> 47:14.000]  2008. The show dates are August 18th and August 22nd and August 29th.
[47:14.000 --> 47:17.000]  And this is of the year 2008?
[47:17.000 --> 47:20.000]  2008, yes.
[47:20.000 --> 47:21.000]  Cool, thanks.
[47:21.000 --> 47:24.000]  And everybody's got to, if you're new to the show, if you weren't around back then, you've
[47:24.000 --> 47:28.000]  got to go listen to that. And Eddie, I'll send you a direct link to it.
[47:28.000 --> 47:30.000]  I'd appreciate that. That would be good.
[47:30.000 --> 47:35.000]  Yeah, God, it's just really great. And Deborah, one of the things on that, on one of those
[47:35.000 --> 47:40.000]  episodes, Tony Davis went on for about an hour about Title 18 never having been approved
[47:40.000 --> 47:47.000]  correctly or never having been certified.
[47:47.000 --> 47:48.000]  Ratified.
[47:48.000 --> 47:50.000]  Whatever happened with that? That was so interesting.
[47:50.000 --> 47:58.000]  He's been shot down in court multiple times over that. I remember him explaining that
[47:58.000 --> 48:02.000]  and he may be right, but the courts are not accepting that. They're saying...
[48:02.000 --> 48:07.000]  It's like they're not accepting the same thing with Title 26 not being substantive law either
[48:07.000 --> 48:09.000]  because it's not in the federal registry.
[48:09.000 --> 48:13.000]  So I'm not so sure that Tony Davis' assessment is accurate on that matter either.
[48:13.000 --> 48:17.000]  That may be the reason why he's not getting any success in court.
[48:17.000 --> 48:23.000]  And actually, I've asked Harmon Taylor about that and he said that that's a non sequitur basically.
[48:23.000 --> 48:26.000]  So I'll ask Harmon about that on Friday.
[48:26.000 --> 48:31.000]  Oh, cool. Yeah, I'd be looking forward to hearing what he says about it because that was
[48:31.000 --> 48:35.000]  sure really interesting stuff. But thank you guys.
[48:35.000 --> 48:38.000]  I will let you go and let somebody else jump in there.
[48:38.000 --> 48:40.000]  All right, Vince. Thanks for calling in. Appreciate it.
[48:40.000 --> 48:41.000]  Okay.
[48:41.000 --> 48:42.000]  All right. Bye-bye.
[48:42.000 --> 48:48.000]  All right. Jean in New York. Good evening, Jean. What can we do for you?
[48:48.000 --> 48:50.000]  Hi, Eddie. How are you?
[48:50.000 --> 48:52.000]  I'm good. And you?
[48:52.000 --> 48:57.000]  Good. Thank you. I called a few weeks ago. I was the one that was stopped.
[48:57.000 --> 49:04.000]  I came to a stop sign and the officer said that I didn't come to a complete stop.
[49:04.000 --> 49:13.000]  And I went back there to see if he could really see clearly like if I really came to a stop or not.
[49:13.000 --> 49:18.000]  And it seems like it was way out of range that he couldn't really see that.
[49:18.000 --> 49:22.000]  And I have to go to court on the 5th of April.
[49:22.000 --> 49:24.000]  What time of the day was it, Jean?
[49:24.000 --> 49:25.000]  Pardon me?
[49:25.000 --> 49:28.000]  What time of the day was it?
[49:28.000 --> 49:32.000]  It was in the morning, probably about 730.
[49:32.000 --> 49:35.000]  Clear, foggy, rainy?
[49:35.000 --> 49:37.000]  Clear.
[49:37.000 --> 49:39.000]  Okay.
[49:39.000 --> 49:48.000]  But he was quite a ways away. He was like up in a driveway that went to another street.
[49:48.000 --> 49:58.000]  Okay. And in the driveway where he's sitting, what direction, according to where you were, would his car be pointing from you?
[49:58.000 --> 50:04.000]  It was facing the street and I was like kitty-cornered to him along the way.
[50:04.000 --> 50:11.000]  On the passenger side or the driver's side from where he would be?
[50:11.000 --> 50:14.000]  Probably the passenger side.
[50:14.000 --> 50:20.000]  Okay. Which means it's possible that he had an obstructed view of you either because of the frame of his windshield,
[50:20.000 --> 50:28.000]  his mirror or something of that nature unless he had it angled where he could see directly at the street you were on.
[50:28.000 --> 50:29.000]  Okay. Go ahead.
[50:29.000 --> 50:32.000]  That's true. Yeah.
[50:32.000 --> 50:40.000]  But I have to go to court on the 5th of April and I don't want to plead guilty because I wasn't guilty.
[50:40.000 --> 50:42.000]  I did come to a complete stop.
[50:42.000 --> 50:46.000]  And how do I plead then?
[50:46.000 --> 50:51.000]  Well, unless there's an actual signed complaint, I wouldn't plea at all.
[50:51.000 --> 50:57.000]  You want to see what's in the court record before you do anything.
[50:57.000 --> 50:58.000]  All right.
[50:58.000 --> 51:04.000]  Okay. Now you had someone in the car with you, you said, or did you, or I'm sorry, you had just dropped them off at school, hadn't you?
[51:04.000 --> 51:06.000]  Yes.
[51:06.000 --> 51:13.000]  Okay. And this officer got you after they were out of the car.
[51:13.000 --> 51:15.000]  Right.
[51:15.000 --> 51:23.000]  Okay. Were there any other cars around and by any chance do you know anybody that was there?
[51:23.000 --> 51:26.000]  Not that I know of. No.
[51:26.000 --> 51:41.000]  Okay. So even if you pleaded not guilty, what would be the officer's evidence other than just his own opinion?
[51:41.000 --> 51:43.000]  None that I know of.
[51:43.000 --> 51:49.000]  Okay. So of course you're going to ask for a jury trial if you have to go that route, right?
[51:49.000 --> 51:51.000]  Right.
[51:51.000 --> 51:56.000]  Okay. So if I were you, if they asked me to plead, I would just say innocent.
[51:56.000 --> 51:59.000]  Well, they're going to say you have to plead guilty or not guilty.
[51:59.000 --> 52:01.000]  No, I plead innocent.
[52:01.000 --> 52:03.000]  Okay.
[52:03.000 --> 52:07.000]  Make them enter a plea for you, which they're going to do most likely.
[52:07.000 --> 52:15.000]  But if you do wind up having to go to court on this, it's his word against yours in front of a jury, okay?
[52:15.000 --> 52:23.000]  And you can demonstrate how it would have been at best difficult for him to see you clearly from that distance,
[52:23.000 --> 52:33.000]  but how you are quite certain that there's no way that you didn't stop, especially was there any other cross traffic at that time?
[52:33.000 --> 52:41.000]  No, but there's kind of like a hill. So like if I'm, you know, looking to my left, there's like a hill that the cars come up,
[52:41.000 --> 52:46.000]  so you would have to stop to see if anybody's coming up that hill.
[52:46.000 --> 52:52.000]  Okay. Then I would just take some pictures of the area.
[52:52.000 --> 52:56.000]  Take also pictures from the vantage point where the officer would have been.
[52:56.000 --> 53:02.000]  Try to figure out as best you can how his car was parked to the best of your recollection.
[53:02.000 --> 53:09.000]  Take pictures from the point of view he would have had to have had sitting where he was sitting and in his seat.
[53:09.000 --> 53:12.000]  See if there's any view obstruction.
[53:12.000 --> 53:17.000]  Try to angle your car several different ways to see if he gets a clear, straight view through the window,
[53:17.000 --> 53:21.000]  and then take pictures of any cars coming through that intersection.
[53:21.000 --> 53:31.000]  And if you have a video camera, do it with video because it would make it easier to see whether or not a car does or doesn't stop.
[53:31.000 --> 53:39.000]  And you can take a look at it and see did that car come to a full stop and see if you could have made that judgment on your own.
[53:39.000 --> 53:42.000]  Right.
[53:42.000 --> 53:49.000]  And these are all things you can introduce into evidence if you're willing to get on the stand and testify on your own behalf.
[53:49.000 --> 53:55.000]  Okay. Now if I do play innocent, would I get in trouble in any way?
[53:55.000 --> 54:01.000]  No, they're just going to throw a fit because they would rather you just use the word guilty in some form.
[54:01.000 --> 54:04.000]  All right.
[54:04.000 --> 54:11.000]  Okay, so I didn't know how to go about this, you know, this proceeding, so.
[54:11.000 --> 54:12.000]  Say that again.
[54:12.000 --> 54:18.000]  No, I said so I didn't know how to go about this proceeding, so that's why I called because I wasn't really sure how to proceed it.
[54:18.000 --> 54:19.000]  Yeah, do that and.
[54:19.000 --> 54:22.000]  I didn't want to play guilty because I'm not guilty, so.
[54:22.000 --> 54:29.000]  Right. Now, the other thing I would do is I'd also go ahead and submit a request for discovery.
[54:29.000 --> 54:38.000]  And I would ask for some interrogatories, which is you're asking the officer to answer a set of specific questions.
[54:38.000 --> 54:45.000]  And those questions would be something along the lines of what was your exact position?
[54:45.000 --> 54:49.000]  What direction was your cruiser facing?
[54:49.000 --> 54:53.000]  Were you in the passenger or driver's seat of the cruiser?
[54:53.000 --> 55:00.000]  Was there any obstruction to your view through the passenger side if you were in the driver's seat of the cruiser?
[55:00.000 --> 55:03.000]  And so on and so forth.
[55:03.000 --> 55:05.000]  Okay.
[55:05.000 --> 55:06.000]  Now, what do you call that again?
[55:06.000 --> 55:08.000]  Something of discovery?
[55:08.000 --> 55:09.000]  It's a list.
[55:09.000 --> 55:13.000]  It's discovery, but it's called interrogatories.
[55:13.000 --> 55:15.000]  Oh, okay.
[55:15.000 --> 55:19.000]  Okay, it's discovery through the means of interrogatories.
[55:19.000 --> 55:20.000]  Okay.
[55:20.000 --> 55:29.000]  And also in that same discovery, ask for a copy of any and all video that was taken that day
[55:29.000 --> 55:36.000]  and if it is intended to be used in your case or not if it relates to you.
[55:36.000 --> 55:38.000]  Okay.
[55:38.000 --> 55:39.000]  All right.
[55:39.000 --> 55:40.000]  Okay.
[55:40.000 --> 55:42.000]  Well, thank you very much, Eddie.
[55:42.000 --> 55:43.000]  You're very welcome, Gene.
[55:43.000 --> 55:45.000]  Thank you for calling in.
[55:45.000 --> 55:46.000]  You too.
[55:46.000 --> 55:47.000]  Bye-bye.
[55:47.000 --> 55:48.000]  Thank you.
[55:48.000 --> 55:49.000]  Bye.
[55:49.000 --> 55:50.000]  All right.
[55:50.000 --> 55:51.000]  Let's go to Mitchell in Texas.
[55:51.000 --> 55:53.000]  Joe and Jim, we see you.
[55:53.000 --> 55:54.000]  Hang on.
[55:54.000 --> 55:55.000]  We'll be right with you.
[55:55.000 --> 55:56.000]  All right.
[55:56.000 --> 55:57.000]  Mitchell, what can we do for you?
[55:57.000 --> 55:59.000]  Eddie, can you hear me all right?
[55:59.000 --> 56:02.000]  I'm calling on Skype for the first time.
[56:02.000 --> 56:05.000]  Yeah, we can hear you, but you're going to get in trouble.
[56:05.000 --> 56:07.000]  I can almost guarantee you that.
[56:07.000 --> 56:10.000]  We can hear you, but it's like we can just barely hear you.
[56:10.000 --> 56:13.000]  We kind of ask that the listeners, if people want to call in,
[56:13.000 --> 56:17.000]  just use the regular telephone because headsets in general do not work on the air.
[56:17.000 --> 56:20.000]  In fact, when I tell the call screeners and when I screen calls,
[56:20.000 --> 56:24.000]  I tell people don't use a Bluetooth, don't use a headset, and with Skype,
[56:24.000 --> 56:28.000]  you pretty much have to use a headset unless you're going to use the onboard mic of your laptop,
[56:28.000 --> 56:29.000]  which is even worse.
[56:29.000 --> 56:33.000]  So I pretty much would rather people not use Skype at all.
[56:33.000 --> 56:34.000]  I mean, the hosts use Skype,
[56:34.000 --> 56:38.000]  but they also have professional audio interfaces for the computer.
[56:38.000 --> 56:40.000]  But go ahead, Mitchell, we can hear you,
[56:40.000 --> 56:43.000]  but you sound a little thin and in the background there,
[56:43.000 --> 56:45.000]  but we'll try to work through it.
[56:45.000 --> 56:46.000]  Go ahead.
[56:46.000 --> 56:48.000]  Okay, I'll try to be brief.
[56:48.000 --> 56:58.000]  Can you give a brief refresher on what I thought was presented maybe like a year ago about police in Texas
[56:58.000 --> 57:04.000]  that issue traffic citations needing to have had a specific type of training
[57:04.000 --> 57:08.000]  in order to issue those traffic citations?
[57:08.000 --> 57:13.000]  And also, if you remember, there was a website you referred to,
[57:13.000 --> 57:16.000]  and I know you may not remember the specific site,
[57:16.000 --> 57:23.000]  but maybe anything I could search for in a search engine where someone had actually looked up
[57:23.000 --> 57:29.000]  which officers for different cities had had that training.
[57:29.000 --> 57:35.000]  Well, the thing you're referring to was as far as the list of who's had the training,
[57:35.000 --> 57:37.000]  it was for different municipalities,
[57:37.000 --> 57:42.000]  and it was gotten through a Freedom of Information request or an open records request,
[57:42.000 --> 57:46.000]  so it's not available on a given website.
[57:46.000 --> 57:48.000]  As far as the material you're speaking of,
[57:48.000 --> 57:57.000]  it comes directly out of the Texas Administrative Code, Title 37, Rule 4.13,
[57:57.000 --> 58:01.000]  and that deals with the certification requirements of officers
[58:01.000 --> 58:08.000]  to enforce the commercial inspections and traffic nature rules,
[58:08.000 --> 58:11.000]  which all of them are in the Transportation Code,
[58:11.000 --> 58:18.000]  but you can find that in Title 37, Rule 4.13, Texas Administrative Code.
[58:18.000 --> 58:20.000]  Great. Thank you, Eddie.
[58:20.000 --> 58:22.000]  You're welcome.
[58:22.000 --> 58:24.000]  All right, folks, we're about to go to break.
[58:24.000 --> 58:27.000]  We have one more time here. Jim, Joe, hang in there.
[58:27.000 --> 58:29.000]  We'll pick you up on the other side.
[58:29.000 --> 58:33.000]  This is our top-of-the-hour break, so we'll be off for about three to four minutes,
[58:33.000 --> 58:35.000]  but when we get back, we'll take Jim and Joe.
[58:35.000 --> 58:37.000]  You'll be right behind him after that.
[58:37.000 --> 58:39.000]  So, folks, please hang in there.
[58:39.000 --> 58:43.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio with Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton.
[58:43.000 --> 58:48.000]  512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[58:48.000 --> 58:52.000]  Please give us a call if you have any questions, queries, or information,
[58:52.000 --> 58:57.000]  and don't forget to come see us on Saturdays at Brave New Books from 3 to 6.
[58:57.000 --> 59:00.000]  We'll be right back on the other side of the break.
[59:00.000 --> 59:04.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[59:04.000 --> 59:08.000]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[59:08.000 --> 59:12.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:12.000 --> 59:17.000]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:17.000 --> 59:19.000]  Enter the Recovery Version.
[59:19.000 --> 59:23.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:23.000 --> 59:28.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:28.000 --> 59:32.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:32.000 --> 59:38.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:38.000 --> 59:43.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free Recovery Version simply for the asking.
[59:43.000 --> 59:53.000]  This comprehensive yet compact Study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:53.000 --> 59:57.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:57.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:04.000]  This news brief brought to you by The International News Next.
[01:00:04.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  Syria deployed security forces Sunday to the northern city of Latakia
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:12.000]  after 12 people were killed in anti-government protests.
[01:00:12.000 --> 01:00:15.000]  Thousands of demonstrators challenging President Bashar al-Assad
[01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:19.000]  have been killed in similar clashes in towns and cities across the country,
[01:00:19.000 --> 01:00:22.000]  including Dara and Sanamin.
[01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:30.000]  Syria has been under repressive emergency rule since the 1963 coup brought the Ba'ath Party to power.
[01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:34.000]  German Chancellor Angela Merkel was humiliated after losing to the Green Party
[01:00:34.000 --> 01:00:39.000]  in the prosperous region of Baden-Württemberg in state elections over the weekend
[01:00:39.000 --> 01:00:42.000]  through fears of nuclear power.
[01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:45.000]  Merkel's ruling Christian Democrat Union lost in the vital election
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:48.000]  where her party had ruled for nearly 60 years.
[01:00:48.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  The Green Party will have its first state premier following the election,
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:57.000]  seen as a referendum on the country's nuclear energy policy.
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:02.000]  Yemen's President Ali Abdullah Saleh clinging to power despite weeks of protests
[01:01:02.000 --> 01:01:05.000]  Sunday withdrew an offer to step down by year's end.
[01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:09.000]  Saleh said Yemen is a ticking bomb, adding without him in power,
[01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  the country would descend into civil war.
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:16.000]  Saleh's opponents, a group that started with students and expanded to include
[01:01:16.000 --> 01:01:21.000]  defecting military commanders, politicians, diplomats, and Saleh's own tribe
[01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  had rejected his offer a week ago.
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:30.000]  US-led military action in Libya has bolstered rebels fighting Muammar Gaddafi's forces,
[01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:33.000]  but the Obama administration says the international operation
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:35.000]  could continue for months.
[01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:39.000]  Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Sunday
[01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  the intervention had effectively rendered Gaddafi's forces defenseless
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:47.000]  against air attacks and allowed anti-government forces to recapture
[01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:50.000]  the key eastern city of Ajbaya.
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:53.000]  Gates said the Pentagon was planning how to draw down resources
[01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:56.000]  that will be assigned to European and other countries,
[01:01:56.000 --> 01:02:00.000]  but asked if that would mean a US military commitment until year's end.
[01:02:00.000 --> 01:02:04.000]  Gates said, I don't think anybody knows the answer to that.
[01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:09.000]  Gates said with tenuous democratic transitions underway in Tunisia and Egypt,
[01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:15.000]  allowing the entire region to be destabilized was a dangerous option.
[01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:18.000]  Egyptians marched Sunday on their interim cabinet,
[01:02:18.000 --> 01:02:23.000]  protesting the recently decreed anti-strike law introduced by acting Prime Minister
[01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:24.000]  Essam Sharraf.
[01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:28.000]  Egypt has witnessed a surge in strikes, demonstrations, and sit-ins
[01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  that began before the fall of dictator Hosni Mubarak
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:34.000]  and has continued despite threats from the military.
[01:02:34.000 --> 01:02:38.000]  Under the new decree, it is a criminal offense to participate
[01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  in a strike, demonstration, or sit-in that disrupts the economy.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:45.000]  Calling for these actions or encouraging others to participate
[01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:50.000]  is punishable by up to a year in prison and a fine of $84,000.
[01:02:50.000 --> 01:02:53.000]  Postal workers, teachers, hospital employees, and police
[01:02:53.000 --> 01:02:58.000]  were still on strike at the time the decree was issued.
[01:03:23.000 --> 01:03:33.000]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty
[01:03:33.000 --> 01:03:40.000]  I read his book and it says, cares come for the unsightly
[01:03:40.000 --> 01:03:49.000]  These warmongers come by that time of Friday
[01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:53.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:03:53.000 --> 01:03:55.000]  This is Runas Law Radio.
[01:03:55.000 --> 01:03:59.000]  512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[01:03:59.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  We have Jim, Joe, Dominic, and Ron.
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:04.000]  Right now, let's go to Jim in Texas.
[01:04:04.000 --> 01:04:06.000]  Jim, what's up?
[01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:12.000]  Well, last month I got stopped by a municipal police officer.
[01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:15.000]  He said I did not have a license plate on the front of my automobile,
[01:04:15.000 --> 01:04:18.000]  which is why he pulled me over.
[01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:22.000]  And I handed him a judicial notice and affidavit.
[01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  And he said, what's this?
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  And I said, well, that details your position there
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  where you do not have the authority to arrest me.
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:32.000]  You are already under color of law.
[01:04:32.000 --> 01:04:35.000]  He read a couple of lines on it and handed it back to me.
[01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:37.000]  And I handed it back to him.
[01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:38.000]  Oh, no, you keep that.
[01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:40.000]  That is evidence on there.
[01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:45.000]  He did not read all of it and proceeded to write me a ticket
[01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:50.000]  for no driver's license, no inspection, expired registration,
[01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:54.000]  and no proof of insurance.
[01:04:54.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  When I went to court on it, well, first off,
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:03.000]  I went and checked my court file or court record on there.
[01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:08.000]  And he had filed an affidavit on each account.
[01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:14.000]  And the court clerk had notarized each affidavit.
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:17.000]  When I went into court, the prosecutor
[01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:19.000]  dismissed everything on there.
[01:05:19.000 --> 01:05:23.000]  So some of that works on there.
[01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:27.000]  I was prepared, though, to file criminal complaints against him
[01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:32.000]  on four counts, one for each, no, six counts on there,
[01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:36.000]  and also criminal complaints against the court clerk.
[01:05:36.000 --> 01:05:41.000]  And if they had proceeded, I had the paperwork there to file
[01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:44.000]  a bar grievance against the prosecutor
[01:05:44.000 --> 01:05:48.000]  as well as prosecutorial misconduct.
[01:05:48.000 --> 01:05:51.000]  And if the judge would have decided to hear it,
[01:05:51.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  I had the paperwork to file judicial misconduct against her
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:05:56.000]  also and a bar grievance.
[01:05:56.000 --> 01:05:57.000]  Well, good.
[01:05:57.000 --> 01:05:59.000]  I thought I would share that with everybody.
[01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:00.000]  Well, good.
[01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:03.000]  What notice did you give him?
[01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  The one you had got from one of your cases,
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  judicial notice and affidavit.
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:12.000]  Ah, the one from the traffic seminar material.
[01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  Yes, uh-huh.
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:15.000]  OK, good.
[01:06:15.000 --> 01:06:18.000]  It does have information they don't want to have to respond to
[01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:20.000]  in court.
[01:06:20.000 --> 01:06:23.000]  Yes, very definitely.
[01:06:23.000 --> 01:06:27.000]  And that's what I'm trying to get folks to understand.
[01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:30.000]  All those guys over in Ellis County that keep saying,
[01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:33.000]  well, that notice wouldn't do you any good over here.
[01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:36.000]  Well, guys, you haven't had the opportunity to see what's in it
[01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:38.000]  yet, have you?
[01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:41.000]  But needless to say, thanks for calling in and letting us know
[01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:42.000]  that, Jim.
[01:06:42.000 --> 01:06:46.000]  It helps to know that the material is doing people some good.
[01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:50.000]  Whether the guys want to read it or not really doesn't matter.
[01:06:50.000 --> 01:06:52.000]  Well, like I told them, this is evidence.
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  You need to hang on to it.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  And it is also in the back of the notice there that this is
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:06:58.000]  evidence.
[01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:01.000]  If you do not bring it to court or lose it or whatever,
[01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:05.000]  then you could be a felony of tampering with evidence
[01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:08.000]  or destroying evidence on there.
[01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:09.000]  Good.
[01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:12.000]  All that is in there, and that most certainly is true.
[01:07:12.000 --> 01:07:15.000]  They are required to protect it since it was picked up in the
[01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:16.000]  stop.
[01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:20.000]  Now, anything else on that?
[01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:21.000]  No.
[01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:25.000]  It's just been my experience that if you want to be left alone,
[01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:27.000]  you need to get their attention, and the best way to get their
[01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:30.000]  attention is hit them in the pocketbook.
[01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:31.000]  Yep.
[01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:33.000]  That would do it every time.
[01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:38.000]  Oh, by the way, was the notice in your file that you gave the
[01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:39.000]  cop?
[01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  Yes, yes.
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:42.000]  The notice was in my file, yes.
[01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  Okay.
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:46.000]  So the cop did understand the difference and he did make sure
[01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:47.000]  it was turned in.
[01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:48.000]  Oh, yes.
[01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:49.000]  Good.
[01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  Yes.
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  Now, by any chance, did you get copies of the information from
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:57.000]  your folder that the officer filled out for the affidavits?
[01:07:57.000 --> 01:07:58.000]  No.
[01:07:58.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  I would have to pay for that on there, and I didn't want to part
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:04.000]  with the money.
[01:08:04.000 --> 01:08:05.000]  Okay.
[01:08:05.000 --> 01:08:07.000]  I was going to say if you had, if you wouldn't mind sharing
[01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:10.000]  those, we can show people the kind of things these officers are
[01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:12.000]  doing, but that's okay if you did or you didn't.
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:13.000]  Yeah.
[01:08:13.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  Well, basically, he just filed an affidavit that I didn't have a
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:18.000]  driver's license.
[01:08:18.000 --> 01:08:22.000]  He filed an affidavit that there was no inspection sticker on the
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  automobile.
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:28.000]  He filed an affidavit, you know, basically what he put on the
[01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:29.000]  ticket on there.
[01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  Just swore to it that that was true and correct is what was on
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:33.000]  the ticket on it.
[01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:34.000]  Right.
[01:08:34.000 --> 01:08:35.000]  All right.
[01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  Thanks for calling in and letting us know, Jim.
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:39.000]  You're welcome, Eddie.
[01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  Have a good evening.
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  You, too.
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:42.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:08:42.000 --> 01:08:43.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:44.000]  All right.
[01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:46.000]  Well, that actually worked out pretty good.
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:47.000]  Good luck there, Jim.
[01:08:47.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  Thank you, Butch.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:50.000]  And keep up the good work.
[01:08:50.000 --> 01:08:51.000]  All right.
[01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:52.000]  Joe, what can we do for you, Joe?
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  Eddie, I had a question.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:57.000]  What date are you supposed to meet with the rep?
[01:08:57.000 --> 01:08:58.000]  I've already met with the rep.
[01:08:58.000 --> 01:09:01.000]  Now it's a matter of him getting us set up with a judicial
[01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:04.000]  committee hearing.
[01:09:04.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  I met with the rep this past Wednesday.
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  Okay.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  Well, I must have had a late hearing on the radio.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:17.000]  So anyway, but I have the phone number and I'm going to call him
[01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:18.000]  up as well.
[01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:19.000]  Yeah, please do.
[01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  That's what I would like for everyone around here to do.
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:27.000]  Call up Representative White, 512-463-0490.
[01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:30.000]  Tell him you had a gentleman by the name of Eddie Craig in to
[01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:34.000]  see you with some issues over the Code of Criminal Procedure
[01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:37.000]  that needs to go before the judicial committee.
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:39.000]  You promised to set up a hearing.
[01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:42.000]  Please make sure that you do that.
[01:09:42.000 --> 01:09:43.000]  Okay.
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:44.000]  Well, thank you.
[01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:45.000]  All right.
[01:09:45.000 --> 01:09:46.000]  Thank you.
[01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:48.000]  Thanks for calling in, Joe.
[01:09:48.000 --> 01:09:49.000]  All right.
[01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  Dominic in Minnesota.
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  Ron, we see you there in California.
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:54.000]  If you'll hang on, we'll get to you right after Dominic.
[01:09:54.000 --> 01:09:56.000]  All right, Dominic, what can we do for you?
[01:09:56.000 --> 01:09:57.000]  Hey, good evening.
[01:09:57.000 --> 01:09:58.000]  How are you guys doing?
[01:09:58.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  Great.
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:00.000]  And you?
[01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:01.000]  Hello.
[01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  Can you guys hear me?
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:03.000]  Yeah.
[01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:04.000]  Yeah, we can hear you.
[01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  We're doing fine.
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:06.000]  Thank you.
[01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:07.000]  What's on your mind, Dominic?
[01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:09.000]  Well, yeah, I'm kind of new to all this stuff here and I just,
[01:10:09.000 --> 01:10:12.000]  I got this number off of a show I was listening to on the
[01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:16.000]  Internet and I just basically called in to listen to the show
[01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:19.000]  and I guess I got in the queue here.
[01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:25.000]  But I'm in a couple of cases right now and, well,
[01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:31.000]  I went through a trial and basically they threw out all my
[01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:35.000]  briefs and all the constitutional stuff,
[01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:42.000]  Andrew 16, book 16, the Supreme Court sites that I had in there,
[01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  all the stuff, they threw it out.
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:47.000]  And just ran me through.
[01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  And how do I get them to go buy it?
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  You're in the state where the legislature lets the judiciary
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  write their own law.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:10:57.000]  You realize that, right?
[01:10:57.000 --> 01:10:59.000]  All right, well, I'm realizing it now.
[01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  Yeah.
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:03.000]  Your judiciary sold you out.
[01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:08.000]  They gave the courts in Minnesota an illegal power under
[01:11:08.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  your Constitution.
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:15.000]  They allow the court to ignore law and make their own rules
[01:11:15.000 --> 01:11:18.000]  for everything as they go along.
[01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:20.000]  Well, there's got to be some remedy.
[01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:23.000]  I mean, one has to think.
[01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:27.000]  Well, when you go in there, don't rely just on the court
[01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:29.000]  sites that you're trying to use.
[01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:34.000]  You need to use them in support of the laws of Minnesota.
[01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:35.000]  Okay.
[01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:36.000]  Okay.
[01:11:36.000 --> 01:11:38.000]  Don't just throw case sightings at them.
[01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  You need to back it up with actually what's in the law,
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:46.000]  and you need to always do it in writing.
[01:11:46.000 --> 01:11:48.000]  Do not do it orally.
[01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  Do not do it verbally.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  Do it in writing, because nine times out of ten,
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:11:58.000]  what you file will be the only record there is.
[01:11:58.000 --> 01:11:59.000]  Great.
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:02.000]  Well, I'm in two cases right now.
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:05.000]  The one case, there's only one case that I was able to,
[01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:10.000]  I think I succeeded in it, where I went in there,
[01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:15.000]  and I went in there with the FISA,
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:18.000]  and I told them that I was sovereign,
[01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:21.000]  and I was immune to these things.
[01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  Well, first, I said that I was here under duress,
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:28.000]  and she said, I didn't order this hearing.
[01:12:28.000 --> 01:12:30.000]  You did, and I didn't order it.
[01:12:30.000 --> 01:12:33.000]  I just submitted a motion to dismiss,
[01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:35.000]  so I didn't order the hearing either.
[01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  Actually, yeah, you did.
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:39.000]  The filing of a motion requires a hearing upon that motion,
[01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  and if you don't set a date, the court will set one.
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:47.000]  Oh, well, anyway, at the end of the thing,
[01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:50.000]  she said that I wasn't here under duress,
[01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  and I said, well, that she didn't order it.
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:54.000]  And I said, well, I didn't order it either,
[01:12:54.000 --> 01:12:56.000]  so I said, I'm going to go.
[01:12:56.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  I'm going to leave.
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:00.000]  And I ended up walking out of the courtroom,
[01:13:00.000 --> 01:13:02.000]  and nobody said anything.
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:05.000]  She held me till last because they started reading my brief,
[01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:07.000]  and I ended up walking out,
[01:13:07.000 --> 01:13:09.000]  and I haven't heard anything from that case,
[01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:12.000]  and this was about two months ago.
[01:13:12.000 --> 01:13:17.000]  And that's the only thing that's worked as far as here so far.
[01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  Well, it worked as far as you know
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  until the next time you get filed.
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:23.000]  Yeah, right, right.
[01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:27.000]  Okay, so let's get back to something
[01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:31.000]  that's just straight up common sense kind of thing here.
[01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:35.000]  If you file a motion, you are moving the court to do something.
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:38.000]  That's what a motion is, moving the court.
[01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:40.000]  Got that part?
[01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:41.000]  Yep.
[01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:45.000]  Second part is there has to be a hearing on that motion
[01:13:45.000 --> 01:13:47.000]  that moves the court.
[01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:50.000]  Now, if you fail to set a time,
[01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:53.000]  the court will usually set one for you.
[01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:55.000]  Okay, I understand that. Okay.
[01:13:55.000 --> 01:13:58.000]  So what you have to get into is whether or not
[01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:02.000]  you are filing the motion as a special appearance,
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  not under duress.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:09.000]  Special appearance means I am not waiving any of my rights
[01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:11.000]  in order to file this motion
[01:14:11.000 --> 01:14:14.000]  to challenge the jurisdiction of the court.
[01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:17.000]  I do not make a general appearance,
[01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:20.000]  which would waive my impersonal jurisdiction.
[01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:24.000]  I make a special appearance for the express purpose
[01:14:24.000 --> 01:14:27.000]  of challenging the court's jurisdiction.
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:28.000]  Okay.
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:30.000]  Then you back it up with your law,
[01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:34.000]  and you back it up with the court cases that support your law
[01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:38.000]  and your understanding of it.
[01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:43.000]  Okay, well, I did that with this last one, the USC,
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:46.000]  the Supreme Court case sites and the...
[01:14:46.000 --> 01:14:49.000]  Are you being charged under the USC?
[01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:53.000]  I'm being charged under the Highway Traffic Code
[01:14:53.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  here in Minnesota.
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  Okay, and where is your information that shows
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  that Title 49 and your Minnesota Code
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:05.000]  are joined together at the hip?
[01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  Well, mine is the Supreme Court site where it says...
[01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:11.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:15:11.000 --> 01:15:13.000]  Okay, go ahead.
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:18.000]  Where is the law that ties the Minnesota statutes
[01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:21.000]  to the United States Code?
[01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  There's the one they've brought up or found.
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:30.000]  Did you ever bother to go read the original statutory enactment
[01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  or legislative enactment on your state transportation code
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:39.000]  or DMV code or whatever it is there in Minnesota?
[01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:42.000]  Yeah, they strip out a lot of stuff,
[01:15:42.000 --> 01:15:44.000]  and they've changed a lot of stuff.
[01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:47.000]  They can't strip out a lot of stuff from an original session law.
[01:15:47.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  It's recorded in books.
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:54.000]  Right, but I mean, they take out stuff
[01:15:54.000 --> 01:15:57.000]  where the newest one was like back in...
[01:15:57.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  You're missing the point here.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:03.000]  There's a difference between statutes and session laws.
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  A big difference.
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:10.000]  A statute is more or less a regulation
[01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:14.000]  that is the result of the existing law.
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:16.000]  It is not the law.
[01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:20.000]  It is evidence that there is a law,
[01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:25.000]  and this is the regulations associated with that law.
[01:16:25.000 --> 01:16:28.000]  Where is your law is my question,
[01:16:28.000 --> 01:16:31.000]  not the changes in your regulations or statutes.
[01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:33.000]  We know that happens.
[01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:38.000]  Where is the original law that says what those regulations
[01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:43.000]  and statutes are limited to applying to?
[01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  Okay.
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  That's what we've got to find.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:47.000]  Hang on just a second.
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  We'll pick this up on the other side, and then we'll get to run.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:54.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio 512-646-1984.
[01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:55.000]  It's a call-in number.
[01:16:55.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  Give us a call.
[01:16:56.000 --> 01:16:59.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:16:59.000 --> 01:17:03.000]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins,
[01:17:03.000 --> 01:17:07.000]  precious metals, and coin supplies in the Austin metro area.
[01:17:07.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  We also ship worldwide.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:11.000]  We're a family-owned and operated business
[01:17:11.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  that offers competitive prices on your coin and metals purchases.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:17.000]  Because of you, Austin, business has been so good
[01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  that we've had to move to a new and bigger location.
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  We're now located at 73-04 Burnett Road Suite A,
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous location.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:29.000]  We're on the west side of Burnett Road
[01:17:29.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  in the Stanley Insurance Building on the ground floor
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  next to the Ishuban Sushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 5.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:41.000]  You're welcome to stop in during regular business hours
[01:17:41.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  or call 512-646-6440.
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:50.000]  on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[01:17:50.000 --> 01:17:53.000]  That's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new location
[01:17:53.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  at 73-04 Burnett Road Suite A or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:04.000]  My name is Randall Kelton, and I co-host on Rule of Law Radio.
[01:18:04.000 --> 01:18:07.000]  We specialize in showing people how to strike back
[01:18:07.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  against corrupt public officials.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:11.000]  With the mortgage crisis worsening,
[01:18:11.000 --> 01:18:13.000]  we set our sights on finding a remedy
[01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:16.000]  for people who have been cheated by their lenders.
[01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:18.000]  If you have a mortgage or have paid yours off,
[01:18:18.000 --> 01:18:21.000]  you have probably been cheated out of thousands,
[01:18:21.000 --> 01:18:22.000]  but there is a remedy.
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:30.000]  Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call me at 512-430-4140
[01:18:30.000 --> 01:18:33.000]  and find out how to use the consumer protection laws
[01:18:33.000 --> 01:18:37.000]  to recover what the lenders have stolen through fraud and deception.
[01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  We will prepare for you a qualified written request
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:44.000]  that will expose the fraud and put the lenders on the dime.
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  Lender fraud is bankrupting this country, and it's time to fight back.
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:55.000]  Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call 512-430-4140
[01:18:55.000 --> 01:19:03.000]  and get the information you need to stop the money changers in their tracks.
[01:19:03.000 --> 01:19:26.000]  Alright folks, we are back at the School of Law Radio.
[01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:28.000]  512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[01:19:28.000 --> 01:19:30.000]  So if you're out there listening in,
[01:19:30.000 --> 01:19:32.000]  have any questions or comments, please give us a call.
[01:19:32.000 --> 01:19:35.000]  We're going to go ahead and finish up with Dominic in Minnesota,
[01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:37.000]  and then we'll head on over to Ron.
[01:19:37.000 --> 01:19:39.000]  Alright, Dominic, what you got?
[01:19:39.000 --> 01:19:40.000]  Let's finish up.
[01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:45.000]  Well, yeah, well, I don't know, if you guys could maybe give me a site
[01:19:45.000 --> 01:19:51.000]  or some helps out here, some way we can support you.
[01:19:51.000 --> 01:19:57.000]  Okay, first thing I recommend you do, find a law library, some university,
[01:19:57.000 --> 01:20:02.000]  some, if you got one in downtown capital somewhere that you have access to,
[01:20:02.000 --> 01:20:05.000]  go find a law library.
[01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:12.000]  Ask them what are the actual legislative session laws
[01:20:12.000 --> 01:20:16.000]  that all the statutes and codes are currently based on.
[01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:24.000]  For instance, here in Texas, the actual session law is from 1925,
[01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:30.000]  and everything in the code books is based upon those actual laws.
[01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:34.000]  So what those laws said they applied to in 25
[01:20:34.000 --> 01:20:41.000]  is the limit of what the statutes and regulations can apply to today.
[01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  Those session laws, can they change those session laws?
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:51.000]  Sure, if they ever actually change session law and create new session law,
[01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:53.000]  but they're not.
[01:20:53.000 --> 01:20:57.000]  They're changing and revising statutory law,
[01:20:57.000 --> 01:21:04.000]  which is the rules and regulations built upon that foundational law.
[01:21:04.000 --> 01:21:06.000]  Okay.
[01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:09.000]  All right, well, yeah, that helps me a lot.
[01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:11.000]  I appreciate that.
[01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:14.000]  That's something I did not know.
[01:21:14.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  That's the problem.
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:16.000]  Most people don't.
[01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:19.000]  They think that what they're looking at is the law.
[01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:21.000]  That's not the case.
[01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:25.000]  It is the regulations associated with the law,
[01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  but the actual base law is something very different.
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:34.000]  Does the session law, does that tie into the USC then or no?
[01:21:34.000 --> 01:21:42.000]  If your session law shows that the state of Minnesota in act this pursuant
[01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  the federal funded program of transportation management,
[01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  then you can show the federal link that proves federal funding.
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:57.000]  If you can show the program is federally funded,
[01:21:57.000 --> 01:22:03.000]  then there must be an umbrella program at the fed level under which it sits.
[01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:06.000]  Guess which one that is.
[01:22:06.000 --> 01:22:11.000]  Okay.
[01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  All right.
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:13.000]  Okay.
[01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  Okay.
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:16.000]  Well, very good.
[01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:18.000]  I appreciate all your helps here.
[01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  You know, every little bit helps.
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:22.000]  I tell you, it's fighting the beast, man.
[01:22:22.000 --> 01:22:25.000]  Well, that's what it is, and it's true everywhere.
[01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:28.000]  All right, but thanks for calling in, Dominic.
[01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:29.000]  Thank you.
[01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  All right, Ron in California.
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:34.000]  Then we have John in Texas.
[01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  Ron, what can we do for you?
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  Hey, how you doing?
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  I'm over here in Alameda County, California,
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:45.000]  and I got into a little situation where my job found out that I don't have a state
[01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:47.000]  driver's license.
[01:22:47.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  So basically I need to transfer my license to California,
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  but I got holders due to failure to appears that I haven't went to
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  just for little minor traffic tickets.
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:02.000]  And today I went to the walking court,
[01:23:02.000 --> 01:23:05.000]  and I had a bill of particulars,
[01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  because I've been doing a little bit of research on it,
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  and one route that I saw was to file a bill of particulars
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  claiming that I understand the nature of the charges that are against me.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:22.000]  So I went to the law library, and I got the form for a bill of particulars,
[01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:24.000]  and I filed it.
[01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:26.000]  I was trying to file it with the clerk.
[01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:29.000]  She wouldn't accept it, because she said she didn't know what it was.
[01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:31.000]  And then the judge came.
[01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:32.000]  He looked at it.
[01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:34.000]  I told him I wasn't going to cross the bar,
[01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  because I didn't want to inspire any jurisdiction or anything like that,
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:39.000]  and he said, okay, fine, that's okay.
[01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  And he looked at the bill of particulars I had,
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:46.000]  and he said, well, this is not applicable to this court,
[01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:49.000]  because it's a civil proceeding.
[01:23:49.000 --> 01:23:53.000]  And I was like, well, isn't this a quasi-contract court?
[01:23:53.000 --> 01:23:57.000]  You know, the rules here, because I got from Nexus,
[01:23:57.000 --> 01:24:00.000]  they said that I could do a bill of particulars,
[01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:03.000]  and the judge said this is not a quasi-contract court.
[01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:04.000]  What are you talking about?
[01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:06.000]  You know, what are you talking about?
[01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  And basically I ended up having to plead my guilty,
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:12.000]  because she would not take the holder off my license,
[01:24:12.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  because I said they didn't have no jurisdiction.
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:18.000]  So he said, well, if you're not appearing,
[01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:20.000]  then I can't take the holder off the license,
[01:24:20.000 --> 01:24:23.000]  and they wouldn't take my bill of particulars.
[01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:26.000]  I just pretty much had to plead my guilty
[01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:29.000]  so I can go and keep working, you know.
[01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:31.000]  That's pretty much the whole reason.
[01:24:31.000 --> 01:24:33.000]  Okay, let me interject something here, Ron.
[01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:34.000]  Yes.
[01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:39.000]  The first thing is you're not crossing the bar to grant jurisdiction, okay?
[01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:41.000]  Okay.
[01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:45.000]  Courts have jurisdiction in three particular instances,
[01:24:45.000 --> 01:24:50.000]  and they must have all three jurisdictions or they have none.
[01:24:50.000 --> 01:24:52.000]  Now, follow this closely.
[01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:53.000]  Okay.
[01:24:53.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  They must have subject matter,
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  meaning the offense itself must be within their power
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:04.000]  and with the authority of law for that particular court
[01:25:04.000 --> 01:25:06.000]  to adjudicate that case.
[01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:10.000]  Got that?
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:11.000]  Hello?
[01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  Yeah, I'm here.
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:13.000]  I hear you. Hello?
[01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  Okay.
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  Okay.
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  So they must have jurisdiction of the offense
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  because the law gives it to them.
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:21.000]  Okay.
[01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:26.000]  The second thing is they must have impersonal jurisdiction,
[01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  meaning that the person that allegedly committed the offense
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:37.000]  was within the jurisdiction of that court when they committed that offense
[01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  that the court by law has jurisdiction of.
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:42.000]  Got that part?
[01:25:42.000 --> 01:25:44.000]  Okay.
[01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:49.000]  And the third is venue, where the offense occurred.
[01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:56.000]  It must have occurred in a geographic or territorial boundary location
[01:25:56.000 --> 01:26:03.000]  that that court has specific law authority over.
[01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:06.000]  If you committed the offense in New Mexico,
[01:26:06.000 --> 01:26:10.000]  California does not have venue jurisdiction.
[01:26:10.000 --> 01:26:16.000]  They also, by definition, would not have impersonal jurisdiction.
[01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:21.000]  Though it may deal with a subject over which, had it occurred in California,
[01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:24.000]  that court would have had jurisdiction over.
[01:26:24.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  You following all that?
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:27.000]  Yeah, I understand.
[01:26:27.000 --> 01:26:30.000]  But, okay, I went to the law library again today,
[01:26:30.000 --> 01:26:34.000]  and it says here for lack of jurisdiction, this is a demurrer.
[01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:37.000]  Somebody told me I needed to file a demurrer instead of a bill of particulars.
[01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  That's true, but that's not the issue I'm talking about.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:45.000]  What I'm talking about is you talking about where you cross this, that, or the other.
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  That's got nothing to do with nothing.
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:51.000]  It's simply where you're standing when you open your mouth to debate the court.
[01:26:51.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  Right.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:55.000]  It's got nothing to do with jurisdiction.
[01:26:55.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  Yeah, okay.
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  I understand that.
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:26:58.000]  Okay.
[01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:02.000]  My whole thing, what I had written down, though, was it says here,
[01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  if it's an unconstitutional statute under the demurrer,
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  I can still file that they have lack of jurisdiction.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:13.000]  Okay.
[01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:14.000]  Well, here's the thing.
[01:27:14.000 --> 01:27:20.000]  If you're going to challenge the thing on constitutionality, you're going to lose.
[01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:25.000]  What you can challenge it on is constitutional application.
[01:27:25.000 --> 01:27:30.000]  Do not say the statute itself is unconstitutional
[01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:34.000]  because if it's applied properly, it probably isn't.
[01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:35.000]  Okay.
[01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  It is unconstitutional, however, if it is applied to someone
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  and restricts them of a right that the Constitution specifically protects.
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:50.000]  The statute's not unconstitutional.
[01:27:50.000 --> 01:27:52.000]  Its application is.
[01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  Okay, okay.
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:27:55.000]  All right?
[01:27:55.000 --> 01:27:59.000]  You need to be specific and detailed in what you argue and why.
[01:27:59.000 --> 01:28:04.000]  These are the little things the courts look at to find a way to shoot you down.
[01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:05.000]  Mm-hmm.
[01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:12.000]  Because I have to go tomorrow again for another one, and that was off of the red light cameras.
[01:28:12.000 --> 01:28:13.000]  Right.
[01:28:13.000 --> 01:28:14.000]  Yeah.
[01:28:14.000 --> 01:28:17.000]  You really need to be talking to Rick.
[01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:20.000]  Rick out there in California has been giving California hell
[01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:23.000]  for a good couple of years now over this stuff
[01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:26.000]  and has pretty much got this down to a science.
[01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:28.000]  You got some of his contact information?
[01:28:28.000 --> 01:28:29.000]  Yes, I do.
[01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:32.000]  If you will please send me an offline email.
[01:28:32.000 --> 01:28:35.000]  He has given me permission to send out his cell phone.
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  I will not broadcast it, however, but I will send it to you in an email if you'll contact me.
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:42.000]  Yeah, we have his email address too.
[01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  Okay, and if Deborah will give that to me, I'll send that as well.
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:46.000]  Yeah.
[01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:47.000]  What's your email address?
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:54.000]  Eddie, E-D-D-I-E, at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:56.000]  All right, thank you very much, sir.
[01:28:56.000 --> 01:28:57.000]  Appreciate it.
[01:28:57.000 --> 01:28:58.000]  Yes, sir, not a problem.
[01:28:58.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  Good luck.
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:00.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  Well, thanks for calling in.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:09.000]  So tomorrow, just to ask, I could just – you could demur on a constitutional application?
[01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:10.000]  Yes.
[01:29:10.000 --> 01:29:17.000]  If you can make the argument that these rules are being applied to a noncommercial entity
[01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  in violation of the law and a constitutionally protected right, then absolutely.
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:25.000]  I don't know that.
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:26.000]  Yeah, I don't even know.
[01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:30.000]  So where do I look to start to find that information?
[01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  That's what we need to get you in touch with Rick Ford, PDQ.
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  Okay, all right.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  I'd file a motion for continuous and see if I can extend it a few days or a couple of
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  weeks.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  Before I go, please, not guilty or whatever?
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  Yeah.
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  I wouldn't plead.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  I'd ask for a continuance.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  All right.
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  Okay.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  Thanks for calling in, Ron.
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:51.000]  All right.
[01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  Have a good one.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  All right.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:55.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, 512-646-1984.
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:29:58.000]  Please give us a call.
[01:29:58.000 --> 01:30:05.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:53.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:53.000 --> 01:31:12.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:42.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:32:42.000 --> 01:32:57.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:32:57.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  All right, folks.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:32:59.000]  We are back.
[01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:06.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton, 512-646-1984.
[01:33:06.000 --> 01:33:10.000]  We've got about a half an hour left in the show, so if you have anything to call in about,
[01:33:10.000 --> 01:33:14.000]  you better get in line real quick so we can try to get you dealt with before we run out
[01:33:14.000 --> 01:33:15.000]  of time.
[01:33:15.000 --> 01:33:17.000]  Right now, let's go to John in Texas.
[01:33:17.000 --> 01:33:19.000]  John, what can we do for you?
[01:33:19.000 --> 01:33:20.000]  Yeah.
[01:33:20.000 --> 01:33:21.000]  Good evening, Eddie.
[01:33:21.000 --> 01:33:22.000]  Good evening.
[01:33:22.000 --> 01:33:25.000]  Eddie, I wanted to say this first of all real quick.
[01:33:25.000 --> 01:33:30.000]  I know you were mentioned on a show a couple days ago that you were thinking of contemplating
[01:33:30.000 --> 01:33:33.000]  possibly a Sunday seminar.
[01:33:33.000 --> 01:33:34.000]  Yeah.
[01:33:34.000 --> 01:33:38.000]  We're trying to figure out whether or not we need to move the Saturdays to Sundays,
[01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:41.000]  or if we might actually need to do it both days.
[01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:42.000]  Yeah.
[01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:45.000]  I have not been able to make it on a Saturday, Eddie.
[01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:49.000]  I actually could, but it would cost me dearly.
[01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  Sunday, I could probably be a pretty regular attendee.
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:59.000]  I'd be coming up from San Antonio, but Saturdays, especially this month, have been very tough
[01:33:59.000 --> 01:34:00.000]  for me.
[01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:03.000]  So I just wanted to give you that feedback.
[01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  Okay.
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:12.000]  Eddie, I have an ongoing issue with the County Bandera.
[01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:15.000]  I've talked to you about this before.
[01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:21.000]  I filed charges against a constable, as you requested.
[01:34:21.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  He had put a peel box on the location to appear before the magistrate on the citation.
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:31.000]  Yeah.
[01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:39.000]  I filed that back on the 15th of February, and I sent an email to the county attorney
[01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:42.000]  and saying, hey, what's up with this?
[01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:47.000]  And all he sent back is saying, well, you know, I haven't had a chance to review it,
[01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:51.000]  you know, and I'll get to it as soon as I can, that sort of thing.
[01:34:51.000 --> 01:34:53.000]  How long should I allow?
[01:34:53.000 --> 01:34:55.000]  How much time should I give him?
[01:34:55.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  And then at what point do I file on him for assuming he's going to blow it off, most likely?
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:10.000]  Well, what is currently in your file?
[01:35:10.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  Well, just the original complaint.
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:16.000]  There is a complaint.
[01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:17.000]  What's that?
[01:35:17.000 --> 01:35:20.000]  There is an actual complaint.
[01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:26.000]  Yes, he has a complaint that was filed back in, well, way back last year
[01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  when I originally got the citation back in August.
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  File a motion to dismiss, failure to prosecute, another motion to dismiss,
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:39.000]  failure to provide a speedy trial.
[01:35:39.000 --> 01:35:43.000]  Yeah, and I already did the speedy trial where he filed that one.
[01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:45.000]  I have it somewhere here with me.
[01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:50.000]  I filed that about a month ago, give or take.
[01:35:50.000 --> 01:35:51.000]  It's okay.
[01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:54.000]  I've done that.
[01:35:54.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  So file a motion for failure to prosecute, dismiss, failure to prosecute.
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:01.000]  Yeah.
[01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:04.000]  Okay.
[01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:08.000]  And then let's see.
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:13.000]  Also, Eddie, you covered this sometime in the past on the complaint.
[01:36:13.000 --> 01:36:20.000]  It actually, it is sworn to and subscribed before me and signed by the court clerk.
[01:36:20.000 --> 01:36:22.000]  Yep.
[01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  And I remember you had said that that is a, she's probably doing this on company time.
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:34.000]  On the clock in her official capacity, that is a major no-no.
[01:36:34.000 --> 01:36:35.000]  Okay.
[01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:42.000]  Because that involves a member of the court directly in the prosecution as the accuser.
[01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:45.000]  The court's no longer fair and impartial.
[01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  Okay.
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:55.000]  Plus it also means a member of the court has directly interfaced with the prosecution to make that complaint.
[01:36:55.000 --> 01:36:57.000]  I see.
[01:36:57.000 --> 01:36:58.000]  Okay.
[01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:04.000]  So what would I do about that?
[01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:06.000]  Well, same thing as before.
[01:37:06.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  That's prosecutorial misconduct.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  If he attempts to use that, you can also file a subpoena demanding that both the accuser
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:22.000]  and the verifier of that complaint be made to appear in court to testify to their knowledge.
[01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:23.000]  Okay.
[01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:28.000]  And since she wouldn't have it, that would be, that would show that she's basically.
[01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:29.000]  Yeah.
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:33.000]  But your question is not along the lines of whether or not she has knowledge of the event.
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:36.000]  You want to know about the complaint.
[01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  And trust me when I tell you, they're not going to like the questions you ask because it shows criminal
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:48.000]  conspiracy between the court, the prosecution, and the clerk.
[01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  Okay.
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:58.000]  You will have that prosecutor jumping up and screaming, dismiss, dismiss, so fast it's not even funny.
[01:37:58.000 --> 01:37:59.000]  Great.
[01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:09.000]  And I think my final one here, sir, is also I noticed on the complaint it had,
[01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:13.000]  we were just talking about this a couple days ago, it was charged with breach of the peace
[01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:16.000]  and that was factually invalid.
[01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  Yes.
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:24.000]  When the conclusion of the complaint says against the peace, that is technical terms according to
[01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:28.000]  Black's law for breach of the peace.
[01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:29.000]  Right.
[01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:33.000]  And they will tell you right up front, no breach of the peace occurred.
[01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:39.000]  And if no breach of the peace occurred, that makes that statement factually and facially invalid in
[01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:44.000]  the complaint because the complaint must be true and accurate.
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  Okay.
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:56.000]  And so now, so based on what I told you, should I file a flurry of requests for dismissal for all these
[01:38:56.000 --> 01:39:01.000]  other things or should I put that all on one motion or should I?
[01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  I would recommend you put every issue that's not directly related to another issue in its own
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:11.000]  separate motion and make the judge rule on them separately.
[01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:12.000]  Okay.
[01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:21.000]  And on the, and these clients still haven't given me a trial date and this citation was issued back in...
[01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:25.000]  Again, failure to prosecute, that's the whole point.
[01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:29.000]  Failure to provide you with a speedy trial and failure to prosecute.
[01:39:29.000 --> 01:39:30.000]  Okay.
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:39.000]  And since I already filed the, I originally filed my motion and a request for a speedy trial.
[01:39:39.000 --> 01:39:46.000]  I did that back in the, back in, I'd have to check in August or, yeah, at the very end of August last year.
[01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  And then I did file a request for dismissal due to lack of speedy trial and what am I, at this point,
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  Eddie, I mean, do I just keep hammering the city attorney or do I just keep...
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  Mr. Municipal, what are you going to hammer him for?
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:11.000]  File your motions in court and serve him with your copies.
[01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:13.000]  Okay.
[01:40:13.000 --> 01:40:15.000]  All right.
[01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:16.000]  You know what I mean?
[01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  I mean, they just keep, they're not doing anything.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:21.000]  That doesn't seem like they're responding.
[01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:23.000]  So...
[01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:24.000]  Right.
[01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  They're intentionally dragging their feet.
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:29.000]  You're entitled as a matter of law in due process to a speedy trial.
[01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  They're way beyond that.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:33.000]  No.
[01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:38.000]  Once they file that complaint, speedy trial clock starts running.
[01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:44.000]  They have two years to file the complaint, but once it's filed, they better be getting you into court.
[01:40:44.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  Right.
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:48.000]  Okay.
[01:40:48.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  And I'm sorry, just one more, just to go back over this, on the clerk that did sign,
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:41:05.000]  should I file something now or should I wait until they give me a trial date and then subpoena her to appear?
[01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  If and when they ever give you a trial date, absolutely, because the subpoena has to tell them when to appear.
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:15.000]  So you have to know when to tell them to appear.
[01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  You can't do that without a trial date.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:20.000]  Okay.
[01:41:20.000 --> 01:41:22.000]  All right.
[01:41:22.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  Thank you so much and have a good night.
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  Thank you for calling in.
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:29.000]  Appreciate it.
[01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:31.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:32.000]  All right.
[01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:34.000]  We have Julian in Virginia.
[01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  Julian, you've got just about two minutes.
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:49.000]  Hi, I just would like to relay to the Rule of Law Radio audience what happened to me at my final day in court.
[01:41:49.000 --> 01:41:58.000]  I had been to court three times already, and on the final day, I just got up there on the stand and questions started coming.
[01:41:58.000 --> 01:42:04.000]  I was asking the officer all these questions, and I ended up telling them that I wasn't in commerce,
[01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:09.000]  and they took a recess, and when I came back, it was all dismissed.
[01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:14.000]  That was improper tags, no insurance, and no registration.
[01:42:14.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  It was just done.
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:20.000]  Yeah, somebody up there has got a clue, don't they?
[01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:30.000]  It was interesting because, you know, in Virginia, these traffic infractions get dismissed if they're fixed by court, by the day of court,
[01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  and the significant thing was this, since I had everything fixed, the significant thing was that only two other people got dismissed without cause,
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:54.000]  and they were people, two women, who had gone 50 years without a traffic ticket, and me, who told them I wasn't in commerce.
[01:42:54.000 --> 01:42:56.000]  Yeah.
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:43:00.000]  Well, always do it in writing, too. Now, don't forget to do that.
[01:43:00.000 --> 01:43:05.000]  Always make your record by filing that particular set of facts in writing.
[01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  Do it either by affidavit or through a motion to dismiss, but preserve those facts in the record, just in case.
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:18.000]  Well, sorry, I don't have as much questions as the last guy.
[01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  No, that's all right. We're almost out of time, so you timed that action pretty good.
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  But do thank you for calling in, and congratulations. Glad it worked out that way for you.
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:32.000]  Yeah, all right. Thanks, man.
[01:43:32.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  All right. Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  All right, folks. We have one more segment to go here, so 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  This is Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:56.000]  Thanks, everybody, so far that's called in. Folks, give us a call. Julian was our last person on the line, so hit us up.
[01:43:56.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:31.000]  The science of modern nutrition, adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component,
[01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:37.000]  and organic hemp protein and greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base.
[01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:41.000]  Plus, centrician tastes great in just water.
[01:44:41.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product, and it's all natural.
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:56.000]  Visit centrician.com to order yours, or call 1-866-497-7436.
[01:44:56.000 --> 01:45:03.000]  After you use centrician, you'll believe in supplements again.
[01:45:03.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:10.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[01:45:10.000 --> 01:45:18.000]  an affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:18.000 --> 01:45:22.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:22.000 --> 01:45:25.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:25.000 --> 01:45:30.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:30.000 --> 01:45:37.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:37.000 --> 01:45:41.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:41.000 --> 01:45:46.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:46.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:55.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:55.000 --> 01:46:18.000]  Visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:18.000 --> 01:46:20.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:20.000 --> 01:46:24.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, 512-646-1984.
[01:46:24.000 --> 01:46:26.000]  This is our last segment.
[01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:28.000]  So, folks, get in line.
[01:46:28.000 --> 01:46:29.000]  We've got one person on.
[01:46:29.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  Oh, take that back.
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:34.000]  We suddenly got a big screen update here.
[01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  All right, we have Ron in California.
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:40.000]  Ron, are you calling back in again?
[01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:42.000]  Oh, Ron disappeared.
[01:46:42.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  All right, let's go to Doug.
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:46.000]  Doug, what can we do for you?
[01:46:46.000 --> 01:46:48.000]  Oh, Eddie, this is Doug.
[01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:56.000]  Is your cell phone the same number that it was like two or three months ago?
[01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:58.000]  As far as I know, it is.
[01:46:58.000 --> 01:46:59.000]  All right.
[01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  I need to call you after the show when you get off and get a little proposition for you.
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  Well, I can't go around drinking your excess out of your car for you
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:13.000]  when you get stopped for open container now, Doug.
[01:47:13.000 --> 01:47:20.000]  No open containers. I've got something that is very important, very important.
[01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:21.000]  Okay.
[01:47:21.000 --> 01:47:22.000]  All right.
[01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:25.000]  Just give me a call after the show, then, and I'll talk to you about whatever it is.
[01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:27.000]  All right. Thank you.
[01:47:27.000 --> 01:47:28.000]  Okay.
[01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:30.000]  You're welcome.
[01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:34.000]  Okay, Ron is back again, and now he's gone again.
[01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:37.000]  Deborah, what's up with the screen here?
[01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:40.000]  People keep calling in and dropping off the board, Eddie.
[01:47:40.000 --> 01:47:41.000]  I don't know.
[01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:42.000]  Okay.
[01:47:42.000 --> 01:47:44.000]  I'm trying to screen calls right now.
[01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:45.000]  All right.
[01:47:45.000 --> 01:47:46.000]  Well, we've got two unscreened here.
[01:47:46.000 --> 01:47:49.000]  I'm going to go ahead and grab one, if that's all right.
[01:47:49.000 --> 01:47:50.000]  Okay.
[01:47:50.000 --> 01:47:51.000]  Wait.
[01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:53.000]  The 210 area code, they're not there anymore.
[01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:57.000]  So we'll just have to take this next call unscreened.
[01:47:57.000 --> 01:47:58.000]  All right.
[01:47:58.000 --> 01:47:59.000]  Here we go.
[01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:00.000]  All right.
[01:48:00.000 --> 01:48:03.000]  Don't know who this is, but you're on the air.
[01:48:03.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  Tell us your first name and what state you're calling from, caller.
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:08.000]  I was just trying to talk to you all off air.
[01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:09.000]  This is Ron.
[01:48:09.000 --> 01:48:10.000]  I just called.
[01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:11.000]  I was trying to get Rick's number.
[01:48:11.000 --> 01:48:12.000]  Can you send Eddie an email?
[01:48:12.000 --> 01:48:14.000]  You can't talk to us off the air.
[01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:16.000]  You cannot talk to us off the air on this phone number.
[01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:19.000]  The number that you just called is the call-in number
[01:48:19.000 --> 01:48:21.000]  for people who want to talk live on the air.
[01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:24.000]  There's no office phone number for Rule of Law Radio.
[01:48:24.000 --> 01:48:26.000]  The email is coming back.
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:27.000]  There's no reply.
[01:48:27.000 --> 01:48:30.000]  Eddie at ruleoflawradio.com?
[01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:31.000]  Yeah.
[01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:32.000]  I don't know.
[01:48:32.000 --> 01:48:33.000]  E-D-D-I-E?
[01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:34.000]  Uh-huh.
[01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:38.000]  Yeah, at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:48:38.000 --> 01:48:39.000]  No.
[01:48:39.000 --> 01:48:41.000]  Ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:45.000]  Go to ruleoflawradio.com and you can click on the contact link.
[01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:46.000]  All right.
[01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:47.000]  Okay, great.
[01:48:47.000 --> 01:48:48.000]  Sorry about that.
[01:48:48.000 --> 01:48:52.000]  Okay, that's all right.
[01:48:52.000 --> 01:48:53.000]  All right.
[01:48:53.000 --> 01:48:56.000]  Got that sorted out.
[01:48:56.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  Let's see.
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:00.000]  Well, that was the only one we had on the board there, Debra,
[01:49:00.000 --> 01:49:05.000]  other than Doug who is just listening to us at this point.
[01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  All right, folks.
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:10.000]  Since we have a few more minutes to wait here,
[01:49:10.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  anything else good going on out there in your lives,
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  please give us a call, 512-646-1984.
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:19.000]  And while we're waiting on somebody to call in,
[01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:22.000]  I'm going to reiterate a little bit of our message from earlier.
[01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:26.000]  Right now we're having our Brave New Books seminars on Saturday.
[01:49:26.000 --> 01:49:30.000]  We are looking at also either moving it to Sunday from 3 to 6
[01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:34.000]  or possibly, if necessary, we have enough people to do it.
[01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:38.000]  We may actually wind up doing it both days.
[01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:42.000]  So if you need to come down and learn what should be going on
[01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:44.000]  in the courts versus what they're doing,
[01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:47.000]  come down and take a listen to what we're talking about
[01:49:47.000 --> 01:49:49.000]  and learning down there.
[01:49:49.000 --> 01:49:53.000]  Okay, we have another caller up on the board.
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:54.000]  Good evening.
[01:49:54.000 --> 01:49:57.000]  Give me your first name and where you're calling from, please.
[01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:00.000]  Christina from San Antonio, Texas.
[01:50:00.000 --> 01:50:01.000]  Well, hi.
[01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:03.000]  What can we do for you?
[01:50:03.000 --> 01:50:11.000]  I had sent in an email to you for Google Richard James Benvidis.
[01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:14.000]  To Google Richard James what?
[01:50:14.000 --> 01:50:16.000]  Well, Richard Benvidis.
[01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:19.000]  I had sent an email to you and it was,
[01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:21.000]  so you can Google his name for his case.
[01:50:21.000 --> 01:50:26.000]  We haven't opened two open cases, both in which he's innocent
[01:50:26.000 --> 01:50:31.000]  and we feel our attorney is hiding things from us.
[01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:33.000]  We're not telling him the full information
[01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:35.000]  in the discovery packet.
[01:50:35.000 --> 01:50:38.000]  He's trying to get him to confess to something
[01:50:38.000 --> 01:50:41.000]  that he didn't know he was confessing to.
[01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:45.000]  We thought he was confessing to one part of the fraud case,
[01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:48.000]  which would be trying to pick up medication,
[01:50:48.000 --> 01:50:50.000]  which he was doing for a friend,
[01:50:50.000 --> 01:50:53.000]  and instead the attorney is saying, no, you,
[01:50:53.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  because he has one for arson and one for fraud.
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  And the attorney says, if you plead on the fraud case,
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  then we'll see what we can do about dismissing the arson
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:08.000]  when he's innocent in both cases.
[01:51:08.000 --> 01:51:15.000]  The defendant has signed a torn affidavit to us stating that
[01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:18.000]  she did not see him, she was mistaken,
[01:51:18.000 --> 01:51:21.000]  and we gave it to our attorney and he had told us that
[01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:24.000]  because it was not notarized by someone he's aware of
[01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:27.000]  and he knows of, then it's no good.
[01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  And it happened in December, all of it.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:35.000]  He's still waiting to be indicted for the arson.
[01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:38.000]  We have witnesses, at least five witnesses,
[01:51:38.000 --> 01:51:40.000]  as to where he was,
[01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:43.000]  but he was nowhere near the fire when it happened.
[01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:47.000]  And we really don't know what's going on.
[01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:49.000]  All right, well, here's the thing.
[01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:52.000]  As far as the affidavits go, if you have these witnesses,
[01:51:52.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  you need to get all of them doing affidavits now.
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:52:01.000]  Why is the defense attorney not talking to these witnesses?
[01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:03.000]  I have no idea.
[01:52:03.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  And my sister is the one that the Austin case is on.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:11.000]  My sister's car got caught on fire,
[01:52:11.000 --> 01:52:13.000]  and she thought she saw my husband.
[01:52:13.000 --> 01:52:18.000]  She later admitted to me that she did not see him.
[01:52:18.000 --> 01:52:24.000]  She admitted to you?
[01:52:24.000 --> 01:52:29.000]  And so I told her, well, because she called me scared and crying,
[01:52:29.000 --> 01:52:33.000]  saying that these district attorneys are saying that
[01:52:33.000 --> 01:52:36.000]  they're going to press charges on her
[01:52:36.000 --> 01:52:39.000]  for all these things that she admitted to Indy
[01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:43.000]  after David trying to convict him.
[01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:46.000]  And they're telling her, if you don't speak to your story,
[01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:48.000]  we're going to charge you with this.
[01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:54.000]  Okay, that's exactly what the district attorney tends to do.
[01:52:54.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  They'll use threats to get a conviction.
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:52:59.000]  They don't care that the party's innocent.
[01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:03.000]  That's not on their scope, so keep that in mind, okay?
[01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:04.000]  Okay.
[01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:07.000]  Now, as far as the witnesses you're speaking of,
[01:53:07.000 --> 01:53:11.000]  the very first thing you need to do is to get a proper affidavit
[01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:15.000]  from each witness as to your husband's whereabouts
[01:53:15.000 --> 01:53:18.000]  on the date and time in question.
[01:53:18.000 --> 01:53:19.000]  Okay.
[01:53:19.000 --> 01:53:20.000]  All right?
[01:53:20.000 --> 01:53:23.000]  Now, make sure it is a proper affidavit.
[01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  Make sure that when they sign it,
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:31.000]  it is done in front of a duly authorized notary public.
[01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:32.000]  Okay.
[01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:33.000]  All right?
[01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:36.000]  Or it is done at the police station
[01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:40.000]  in front of a law enforcement officer
[01:53:40.000 --> 01:53:45.000]  who will verify the affidavit.
[01:53:45.000 --> 01:53:48.000]  That is the very first thing.
[01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:52.000]  Now, you need to make sure the affidavit is in proper form.
[01:53:52.000 --> 01:53:55.000]  There are certain things an affidavit must have in it,
[01:53:55.000 --> 01:53:59.000]  or it's not going to be considered a proper affidavit.
[01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:03.000]  So you need to talk to somebody that can point you to an example
[01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:06.000]  of a proper affidavit.
[01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:09.000]  Okay, I can probably find it on the net.
[01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:10.000]  Be careful with that.
[01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:13.000]  All the ones on the net are not proper either.
[01:54:13.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  Okay.
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:15.000]  All right?
[01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:17.000]  If you have access to a university law library,
[01:54:17.000 --> 01:54:19.000]  which I do believe you do in San Antonio,
[01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:22.000]  I was stationed there for quite a while at Lackland.
[01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:25.000]  So you should have access to one.
[01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:26.000]  Okay.
[01:54:26.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  Yeah, there should be one of those facts.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:29.000]  Right.
[01:54:29.000 --> 01:54:32.000]  Go down there and ask the librarian to show you an example
[01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:37.000]  of an affidavit that the law allows to exist.
[01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:38.000]  Okay?
[01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:39.000]  That's proper.
[01:54:39.000 --> 01:54:45.000]  In general, a proper affidavit is when somebody is stating facts
[01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:49.000]  that they have personal firsthand knowledge of,
[01:54:49.000 --> 01:54:54.000]  something they themselves witnessed or read or saw or experienced.
[01:54:54.000 --> 01:55:00.000]  And if it has to do with, you know, legal documents, you know,
[01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:04.000]  knowledge of a contract or a rental agreement or something like that,
[01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  then generally you would provide a copy of that contract
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:11.000]  or rental agreement in support of the affidavit.
[01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:14.000]  But it also must contain certain statements
[01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:17.000]  such as the name of the individual making it,
[01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:21.000]  that they are of proper legal age to make it,
[01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:25.000]  that they are of sound mind and fully capable of making it,
[01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:30.000]  and that the affidavit is made under penalty of perjury.
[01:55:30.000 --> 01:55:32.000]  Yeah, and it has to be notarized too.
[01:55:32.000 --> 01:55:38.000]  So if those elements don't exist, it's not a proper affidavit.
[01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:40.000]  Okay.
[01:55:40.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  Okay, and as for the fraud, what?
[01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:46.000]  I don't understand why our attorney wouldn't,
[01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:52.000]  and he did not tell us that he was getting charged with,
[01:55:52.000 --> 01:55:55.000]  I don't know how the prescription was even brought in
[01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:58.000]  or I don't know how it came about,
[01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:02.000]  but they're charging him with the whole process of doing it
[01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  when all he did was go to pick it up for the friend,
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:09.000]  which is my sister, again.
[01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:10.000]  Okay.
[01:56:10.000 --> 01:56:14.000]  Well, again, what you need to do is get control of your attorney.
[01:56:14.000 --> 01:56:17.000]  The first thing you're going to do is bar grieving, okay?
[01:56:17.000 --> 01:56:18.000]  Okay.
[01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:21.000]  Misconduct, okay?
[01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:22.000]  Okay.
[01:56:22.000 --> 01:56:24.000]  You're going to bar grieving
[01:56:24.000 --> 01:56:29.000]  for not protecting your husband's due process rights
[01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:33.000]  and for every single right he's got that he hasn't protected,
[01:56:33.000 --> 01:56:35.000]  bar grieving.
[01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:36.000]  Okay.
[01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:39.000]  And let him know this is not going to fly.
[01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  You're trying to help them railroad him
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:44.000]  by getting him to sign a confession
[01:56:44.000 --> 01:56:47.000]  by lying to him about what he's signing.
[01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:48.000]  Yeah.
[01:56:48.000 --> 01:56:49.000]  That's misconduct.
[01:56:49.000 --> 01:56:51.000]  That's pretty typical, Christina.
[01:56:51.000 --> 01:56:53.000]  That is extremely typical.
[01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:58.000]  Most defense attorneys, including defense attorneys that are hired,
[01:56:58.000 --> 01:57:01.000]  they're not going to look out for the client's interest.
[01:57:01.000 --> 01:57:05.000]  All they want to do is work with the prosecutor to strike a plea deal
[01:57:05.000 --> 01:57:07.000]  so they can do the least amount of work.
[01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:11.000]  That's typical, extremely typical.
[01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:12.000]  That's exactly what he's doing.
[01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:16.000]  I spoke to him today and I said, you know, I'm the one that chose you,
[01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:19.000]  and it feels like you're not even trying to prove my husband's innocence.
[01:57:19.000 --> 01:57:20.000]  No.
[01:57:20.000 --> 01:57:23.000]  Or waiting for a DA and extension expenses.
[01:57:23.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  Absolutely.
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:27.000]  No, he's not going to try to prove your husband's innocence.
[01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:29.000]  He's not going to fight for your husband's rights.
[01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  That's not what he's there for.
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:33.000]  That is not their MO.
[01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:36.000]  If you want them to do that, you have to force them to do that
[01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:40.000]  with threats of malpractice lawsuits and filing bar grievances.
[01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:41.000]  Okay.
[01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:43.000]  Would I be able to do that if my husband asked you?
[01:57:43.000 --> 01:57:44.000]  No.
[01:57:44.000 --> 01:57:46.000]  Anyone that knows he's done this can do it.
[01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:50.000]  You and your husband can both bargrieve him independently.
[01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:54.000]  Both of you can sue him for malpractice independently.
[01:57:54.000 --> 01:57:55.000]  Okay.
[01:57:55.000 --> 01:58:01.000]  When I asked him today, he said, well, I really don't care what you think about it
[01:58:01.000 --> 01:58:02.000]  or what you want.
[01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:05.000]  I only have to answer to Richard.
[01:58:05.000 --> 01:58:08.000]  Yeah, well, he's going to care when you file a bar grievance on his butt
[01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:11.000]  and he loses his malpractice insurance over it.
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  Yeah, now that I know that I can, because I thought I had no...
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  No, you can file a bar grievance against him.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:22.000]  Anybody can file a bar grievance against any attorney for almost any reason
[01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:24.000]  as long as the reason is somewhat legitimate.
[01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:28.000]  If you have personal knowledge that he is acting inappropriately,
[01:58:28.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  then you can file a bar grievance.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:33.000]  But they're not going to tell you that because that's their weakness.
[01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  Yeah.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:40.000]  That causes their malpractice insurance carriers to want to drop them
[01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:41.000]  and raise their rates.
[01:58:41.000 --> 01:58:42.000]  All right, listen...
[01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:45.000]  It's like the vampire telling you about holy water daylight
[01:58:45.000 --> 01:58:47.000]  and what size and shape to make your wooden stake.
[01:58:47.000 --> 01:58:48.000]  Exactly.
[01:58:48.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  All right, listen, Christina, we're at the end of the show.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:51.000]  We've got to let you go.
[01:58:51.000 --> 01:58:53.000]  We'll be back on Thursday night.
[01:58:53.000 --> 01:58:56.000]  And folks, don't forget, Harmon Taylor on Friday night.
[01:58:56.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Have a very blessed week.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:13.000]  I'm like a stepping razor, don't you watch my sides, I'm dangerous, dangerous.
[01:59:13.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  If you are a Chucky, somebody Chucky from me.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:28.000]  If you are a Chucky, somebody Chucky from me.
[01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:35.000]  I'm like a stepping razor, don't you watch my sides, I'm dangerous, dangerous.
[01:59:35.000 --> 01:59:42.000]  I'm like a stepping razor, don't you watch my sides, I'm dangerous, dangerous.
[01:59:42.000 --> 01:59:50.000]  If you eat, I fall, if you treat me good.
[01:59:50.000 --> 02:00:13.000]  If you eat, I fall, if you treat me good.