ROL_2011-03-04_16k_Hr1-2.timecode
[00:00.000 --> 00:04.440] This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[00:04.440 --> 00:09.600] In Libya, at least 30 civilians were killed Friday after pro-Gaddafi forces attempted
[00:09.600 --> 00:15.360] to retake the town of Azzawea, the closest rebel-held territory to the capital Tripoli,
[00:15.360 --> 00:17.360] and the site of an oil refinery.
[00:17.360 --> 00:22.220] Poorly equipped and untrained rebel fighters vowed victory or death in their revolution
[00:22.220 --> 00:27.080] against Muammar Gaddafi's 41-year rule.
[00:27.080 --> 00:32.120] Israeli officials said Thursday a peace deal with the Palestinians cannot be reached right
[00:32.120 --> 00:33.120] now.
[00:33.120 --> 00:38.400] However, with popular protests shaking up the Mideast, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
[00:38.400 --> 00:43.640] is under fierce international pressure to prove he's serious about peacemaking following
[00:43.640 --> 00:51.240] the U.S. veto of a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Israel's West Bank settlement construction.
[00:51.240 --> 00:57.040] Meanwhile, Palestinians have launched a campaign to seek international recognition of Palestinian
[00:57.040 --> 00:58.040] statehood.
[00:58.040 --> 01:04.080] Andrew Warren, a former CIA spy, has been sentenced to five and a half years in jail
[01:04.080 --> 01:07.120] for drugging and sexually abusing an Algerian woman.
[01:07.120 --> 01:11.320] U.S. District Judge Ellen Hoover said Warren seemed to think he could get away with the
[01:11.320 --> 01:16.080] crime because he had diplomatic immunity and his victim was a married Muslim who would
[01:16.080 --> 01:21.240] be unlikely to report the crime for fear of becoming an outcast.
[01:21.240 --> 01:26.920] A Republican-backed measure to restrict the collective bargaining rights of 350,000 teachers
[01:26.920 --> 01:31.480] — firefighters, police officers, and other public employees — squeaked through the
[01:31.480 --> 01:34.680] Ohio Senate by one vote.
[01:34.680 --> 01:38.920] Firefighters and teachers shouted shame in the chamber as the legislation was approved
[01:38.920 --> 01:44.240] and moved to the GOP-controlled House, where it was likely to receive strong support.
[01:44.240 --> 01:49.480] The bill is similar to the Republican anti-union legislation in Wisconsin that has sparked
[01:49.480 --> 01:51.880] heated national debate.
[01:51.880 --> 01:56.520] Wisconsin's bill exempts police and firefighters from collective bargaining restrictions, while
[01:56.520 --> 01:58.360] Ohio's does not.
[01:58.360 --> 02:03.360] The Ohio bill would ban strikes by public workers and impose penalties for those who
[02:03.360 --> 02:06.080] walk out.
[02:06.080 --> 02:10.760] Thousands of protesters massed in cities and towns across Iraq Friday for rallies against
[02:10.760 --> 02:14.400] corruption, unemployment, and poor public services.
[02:14.400 --> 02:19.400] Galvanized by uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia, demonstrations have been taking place in Iraq
[02:19.400 --> 02:24.360] for the past month, with protesters decrying a lack of improvement in their daily lives
[02:24.360 --> 02:29.840] eight years after the U.S.-led invasion that ousted Saddam, allegedly to bring democracy
[02:29.840 --> 02:30.840] to Iraq.
[02:30.840 --> 02:37.560] Of these, 29 people were killed in rallies last week by security forces and 300 detained.
[02:37.560 --> 02:42.880] Organizers dubbed Friday a day of regret to mark one year since parliamentary elections.
[02:42.880 --> 02:48.480] In Baghdad, protesters chanted, oil for the people, not for the thieves.
[02:48.480 --> 02:52.760] Demonstrators were each frisked at least three times before being allowed to enter Tahrir
[02:52.760 --> 02:53.760] Square.
[02:53.760 --> 02:57.520] In Baghdad, Abdullah, who walked three hours to get to the square, said, we are fighting
[02:57.520 --> 02:59.600] for freedom and real democracy.
[02:59.600 --> 03:04.680] For more details on these stories, visit www.inmworldreport.net.
[03:04.680 --> 03:16.640] You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network at ruleoflawradio.com, live free speech
[03:16.640 --> 03:35.640] talk radio at its best.
[03:35.640 --> 03:59.760] Thank you for listening.
[04:05.640 --> 04:32.200] Alright, bad boys and bad girls, with a Z, bad boys and bad girls, we are coming after
[04:32.200 --> 04:38.720] you here on the rule of law, we got Randy Kelton, Eddie Craig, I'm Deborah Stevens,
[04:38.720 --> 04:46.240] this is our four hour Friday info marathon, it is Friday March 4th, we'll be taking your
[04:46.240 --> 04:55.480] calls, 512-646-1984, we got some stuff lined up for y'all tonight, and first Eddie has
[04:55.480 --> 05:00.640] got some, I guess this is some proposed legislation that's going to kick the TSA's butt every
[05:00.640 --> 05:06.720] which way from Sunday, or is this legislation that already exists, what's the scoop, Eddie?
[05:06.720 --> 05:12.200] This is legislation that has been put into the works by a man by the name of Simpson,
[05:12.200 --> 05:20.760] newly elected to the Texas legislature, and he's enacted a couple of bills, one is specifically,
[05:20.760 --> 05:31.160] let me see here, the actual bill is House Bill 1937 and House Bill 1938, now the text
[05:31.160 --> 05:39.120] of these bills is very interesting, 1937 I do believe actually makes an amendment to
[05:39.120 --> 05:49.160] the existing Texas penal code, and what it does is it names a new assaultive offense,
[05:49.160 --> 05:56.640] and in this section 22.011 penal code is amended by amending subsections A and F and adding
[05:56.640 --> 06:03.560] subsection G to read as follows, well they amended A with a new item three, sub item
[06:03.560 --> 06:10.320] three which reads thusly, as part of a search performed to grant access to a publicly accessible
[06:10.320 --> 06:16.520] building or form of transportation intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly, searches another
[06:16.520 --> 06:22.400] person without probable cause to believe the person committed an offense and touches the
[06:22.400 --> 06:27.380] anus, sexual organs, or breasts of the other person, including touching them through clothing,
[06:27.380 --> 06:33.440] or touches the other person in a manner that would be offensive to a reasonable person,
[06:33.440 --> 06:40.000] subsection F is amended to read an offense under subsections A1 and A2 is a felony of
[06:40.000 --> 06:45.640] the second degree, except that an offense under subsection A1 and A2 is a felony of
[06:45.640 --> 06:50.240] the first degree if the victim was a person whom the actor was prohibited from marrying
[06:50.240 --> 06:54.400] or purporting to marry, or with whom the actor was prohibited from living under the appearance
[06:54.400 --> 07:02.320] of being married, and under section 25.01, an offense under subsection A3, which is the
[07:02.320 --> 07:10.320] new sub item, is a state jail felony, and in subsection G, with the consent of the appropriate
[07:10.320 --> 07:15.360] local county or district attorney, the attorney general has concurrent jurisdiction with that
[07:15.360 --> 07:21.440] consenting local prosecutor to prosecute an offense under subsection A3.
[07:21.440 --> 07:26.040] So not only can the locals prosecute this, but so can the attorney general.
[07:26.040 --> 07:31.240] Now this sounds like this is just for touching, but what about the naked body scanners?
[07:31.240 --> 07:32.440] What about the pornography?
[07:32.440 --> 07:35.600] That's in House Bill 38.
[07:35.600 --> 07:41.040] Now the problem that I see with this is the same problem we have with all the other laws
[07:41.040 --> 07:42.720] that's on the books.
[07:42.720 --> 07:49.600] Each one of these moron prosecutors is actually going to do their job and prosecute somebody.
[07:49.600 --> 07:51.880] We can report it all day long.
[07:51.880 --> 07:52.920] We can record it.
[07:52.920 --> 07:59.040] We can make note of it, but until these prosecutors get off their behinds and actually do something,
[07:59.040 --> 08:00.040] it's pointless.
[08:00.040 --> 08:01.120] Now wait a minute.
[08:01.120 --> 08:04.640] That's what we can do.
[08:04.640 --> 08:10.660] These guys are acting in the capacity of public officials.
[08:10.660 --> 08:17.960] So when we make an accusation against one of them, the prosecutor has no option.
[08:17.960 --> 08:20.680] Well also there's another issue.
[08:20.680 --> 08:25.960] The reason that there's usually so much difficulty getting these prosecutors to prosecute public
[08:25.960 --> 08:30.960] servants is because usually we're trying to ask the prosecutors or demanding that the
[08:30.960 --> 08:39.240] prosecutors prosecute their buddies, their friends, other local officials or state officials.
[08:39.240 --> 08:41.760] These are fence.
[08:41.760 --> 08:47.280] As we saw at that seminar that we gave in New Mexico, in Deming, New Mexico a couple
[08:47.280 --> 08:54.760] years ago, Randy, remember that state prosecutor, the look on his face, I would say resembled
[08:54.760 --> 08:57.160] that of the Cheshire cat.
[08:57.160 --> 09:00.440] We're talking a grin from ear to ear with teeth.
[09:00.440 --> 09:04.680] His smile was as big as the room.
[09:04.680 --> 09:12.200] When the prospect came up of him being able to prosecute federal agents and people listen,
[09:12.200 --> 09:16.440] this issue with the TSA, I mean it's been all over the news, the mainstream media, the
[09:16.440 --> 09:17.440] dinosaur news.
[09:17.440 --> 09:19.880] It's been all over the alternative news.
[09:19.880 --> 09:26.120] Everybody is sick of these guys and also the local officials, the local public servants,
[09:26.120 --> 09:32.400] especially law enforcement, they hate these guys for another reason.
[09:32.400 --> 09:41.080] The TSA agents go around sporting badges and purporting themselves to be law enforcement
[09:41.080 --> 09:42.080] and they're not.
[09:42.080 --> 09:45.160] The TSA is a civil regulatory agency.
[09:45.160 --> 09:47.080] They are not law enforcement.
[09:47.080 --> 09:51.440] They can't get a search warrant if they wanted to and for them to go around wearing badges
[09:51.440 --> 09:57.000] and with their puffed up chests, I'll tell you what, the police and the sheriff's offices,
[09:57.000 --> 10:02.880] the sheriff's departments in a lot of cities and states are very angry at these guys.
[10:02.880 --> 10:04.440] We've got cafes.
[10:04.440 --> 10:06.840] We've got private establishments.
[10:06.840 --> 10:12.400] We've got private establishments in Seattle who refuse to serve the TSA agents.
[10:12.400 --> 10:15.040] They kick them out of their establishment.
[10:15.040 --> 10:18.680] The quote is, they're kind, aren't welcome in our establishment.
[10:18.680 --> 10:24.200] I mean the whole country is against TSA right now because of the body scannings and the
[10:24.200 --> 10:26.440] sexual molestations.
[10:26.440 --> 10:31.760] I don't really think we're going to have all that much difficulty getting these state prosecutors
[10:31.760 --> 10:33.240] to prosecute these guys.
[10:33.240 --> 10:38.920] In fact, there's DAs coming out from all over the country, namely in California, that are
[10:38.920 --> 10:43.560] actively coming out even without any other laws saying, we're going to prosecute you
[10:43.560 --> 10:44.560] guys.
[10:44.560 --> 10:48.640] So I don't think that we're going to have as much trouble getting these prosecutors
[10:48.640 --> 10:53.240] to prosecute the TSA agents as we have getting them to prosecute their buddies.
[10:53.240 --> 11:01.160] Well, here's, I'm sorry, here's the other thing about that though if I can interject.
[11:01.160 --> 11:03.800] TSA is not federal.
[11:03.800 --> 11:11.040] TSA belongs to Lockheed Martin, a defense contractor, but they are not federal.
[11:11.040 --> 11:13.240] Yes, they are.
[11:13.240 --> 11:17.620] They're coming in under a federal umbrella, under a federal authority.
[11:17.620 --> 11:21.920] They are a private corporation, but they're contracting to the federal government and
[11:21.920 --> 11:25.880] they're in there under federal authority.
[11:25.880 --> 11:29.000] They're cloaked in, they are cloaked in that federal authority.
[11:29.000 --> 11:31.440] I don't care what they are.
[11:31.440 --> 11:38.440] Well, again, the reason I say this is, is because since this does not directly involve
[11:38.440 --> 11:43.800] interstate commerce per se, federal authority does not actually exist.
[11:43.800 --> 11:49.800] The TSA could not be in the state airports if the states did not allow it.
[11:49.800 --> 11:54.880] If the state said, get the hell out, they would have to because there would be no federal
[11:54.880 --> 11:56.400] authority to put them there.
[11:56.400 --> 12:01.640] It wouldn't make any difference if their federal authorities are not.
[12:01.640 --> 12:06.920] Even if they're acting in their capacity as a public official, they have no authority
[12:06.920 --> 12:11.400] to violate state law, state criminal law specifically.
[12:11.400 --> 12:18.200] Now, speaking of state law, let's go to House Bill 1938 that Simpson also introduced and
[12:18.200 --> 12:19.440] this is what it is.
[12:19.440 --> 12:25.640] It's almost completely brand new, a bill to be entitled to an act relating to prohibition
[12:25.640 --> 12:30.360] of whole body scanners in airports, providing criminal and civil penalties.
[12:30.360 --> 12:34.880] Now, I'm going to read you this, it's fairly short, but the one problem I'll find with
[12:34.880 --> 12:41.020] it right quick is that it does not outlaw the mobile body scanners.
[12:41.020 --> 12:47.280] It only deals with these scanners as they appear in airports, but listen to this.
[12:47.280 --> 12:51.720] State enacted by the Legislature of the State of Texas, Section 1, Subchapter Z, Chapter
[12:51.720 --> 13:00.200] 22, Transportation Code is amended by adding Section 22.902 to read as follows.
[13:00.200 --> 13:08.680] Section 22.902, Whole Body Scanner, Subsection A, in this Section 1, airport operator means
[13:08.680 --> 13:16.160] A, a local government that owns or controls an airport or B, a person who operates as
[13:16.160 --> 13:21.600] the agent of a local government or otherwise, an airport owned or controlled by the local
[13:21.600 --> 13:26.320] government, Subsection 2 or Sub-Item 2.
[13:26.320 --> 13:31.360] Body imaging scanning equipment means a device including a device that uses backscatter x-rays
[13:31.360 --> 13:36.500] or millimeter ways that creates a visual image of a person's unclothed body and is intended
[13:36.500 --> 13:39.240] to detect concealed objects.
[13:39.240 --> 13:44.660] Subsection B, an airport operator may not allow body image scanning equipment to be
[13:44.660 --> 13:48.960] installed or operated in any airport in this state.
[13:48.960 --> 13:54.520] C, an airport operator commits an offense if the operator fails to comply with Subsection
[13:54.520 --> 14:01.560] B. D, an airport operator who commits an offense under Subsection C is subject to a civil penalty
[14:01.560 --> 14:07.240] in an amount not to exceed $1,000 for each day of the violation.
[14:07.240 --> 14:12.080] Subsection E, the attorney general may bring suit in a district court of Travis County
[14:12.080 --> 14:18.680] 1 for injunctive relief or 2 to collect the civil penalty described by Subsection D plus
[14:18.680 --> 14:24.200] court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred by the attorney general.
[14:24.200 --> 14:29.680] So that's what they're doing with House Bill 1938 and the transportation code regarding
[14:29.680 --> 14:30.680] this.
[14:30.680 --> 14:34.860] So there are actually two different bills, one against the naked body scanners and one
[14:34.860 --> 14:37.120] against the sexual molestations.
[14:37.120 --> 14:42.320] Right, one is going into the transportation code, which is 1938, and one is going into
[14:42.320 --> 14:44.680] the penal code, which is 1937.
[14:44.680 --> 14:48.520] Did the same legislator introduce both of these bills?
[14:48.520 --> 14:50.280] Yes, Simpson put them both in.
[14:50.280 --> 14:54.360] Simpson, is this in the Senate that it was introduced or the House?
[14:54.360 --> 14:56.560] House, House Bill.
[14:56.560 --> 14:57.560] This is great.
[14:57.560 --> 15:05.080] This is absolutely fantastic and they're doing this in New Hampshire too.
[15:05.080 --> 15:07.040] This is great.
[15:07.040 --> 15:09.920] And even here in Austin, there's overwhelming support.
[15:09.920 --> 15:14.400] I think it was the airport commission, which is an advisory committee.
[15:14.400 --> 15:23.240] The airport advisory committee came to a unanimous decision in a hearing a month or so ago to
[15:23.240 --> 15:30.000] advise the city council to basically pass some kind of resolution or referendum that
[15:30.000 --> 15:32.760] they're not going to allow the body scanners in the airports.
[15:32.760 --> 15:38.000] Now the problem is, I don't know if that's going to carry any weight even if the city
[15:38.000 --> 15:42.040] council does pass such a resolution and here's why.
[15:42.040 --> 15:48.060] Once you turn over airport security to TSA, they get to do whatever they want.
[15:48.060 --> 15:53.560] And so if the city of Austin as an entity really doesn't want the naked body scanning
[15:53.560 --> 15:58.880] or the pat downs, what they're going to have to do is kick TSA out of the airport altogether.
[15:58.880 --> 16:04.000] I mean it's not a requirement that TSA runs security for the airport folks.
[16:04.000 --> 16:05.800] I mean think about it.
[16:05.800 --> 16:09.240] It's a municipal airport.
[16:09.240 --> 16:15.280] It's up to the city to decide what security entity runs security at the airport and to
[16:15.280 --> 16:21.160] be honest, it really should be, it's really the airliner's responsibility because the
[16:21.160 --> 16:25.680] whole idea is to keep the plane safe when they're in the air.
[16:25.680 --> 16:27.480] This is a private enterprise.
[16:27.480 --> 16:30.200] The government doesn't even need to be involved in it at all.
[16:30.200 --> 16:36.000] The airliners, it's the airliners responsibility for hiring security and TSA shouldn't even
[16:36.000 --> 16:37.000] be involved at all.
[16:37.000 --> 16:39.000] I mean they're a federal agency and...
[16:39.000 --> 16:42.920] Right, again this goes back to what I was saying about the lack of federal authority
[16:42.920 --> 16:43.920] in this.
[16:43.920 --> 16:44.920] Right.
[16:44.920 --> 16:45.920] I mean it's a municipal airport.
[16:45.920 --> 16:48.200] It's not a federal, it's not a federal property.
[16:48.200 --> 16:50.480] All right, we'll be right back.
[16:50.480 --> 16:52.760] There is a house concurrent resolution with this.
[16:52.760 --> 16:54.760] It's too early to get back.
[16:54.760 --> 17:01.040] All right, we'll be talking about this some more on the other side.
[17:01.040 --> 17:05.840] Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals and coin supplies
[17:05.840 --> 17:07.760] in the Austin metro area.
[17:07.760 --> 17:09.560] We also ship worldwide.
[17:09.560 --> 17:13.400] We're a family owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin
[17:13.400 --> 17:14.400] and metals purchases.
[17:14.400 --> 17:20.200] Because of you Austin, business has been so good that we've had to move to a new and bigger
[17:20.200 --> 17:21.200] location.
[17:21.200 --> 17:27.040] We're located at 7304 Burnet Road Suite A, 1.2 miles north on Burnet from our previous
[17:27.040 --> 17:28.040] location.
[17:28.040 --> 17:32.600] We're on the west side of Burnet Road in the Stanley Insurance Building on the ground floor
[17:32.600 --> 17:35.240] next to the Ishuban Sushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[17:35.240 --> 17:39.440] We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 5.
[17:39.440 --> 17:45.600] You're welcome to stop in during regular business hours or call 512-646-6440.
[17:45.600 --> 17:50.040] Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us on Lulavlaw Radio or Texas Liberty
[17:50.040 --> 17:55.720] Radio, that's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new location at 7304 Burnet Road Suite
[17:55.720 --> 18:00.600] A. We'll call 512-646-6440.
[18:00.600 --> 18:05.200] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:05.200 --> 18:09.400] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.400 --> 18:13.720] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.720 --> 18:14.720] can win too.
[18:14.720 --> 18:19.520] You'll get step-by-step instructions in flaying English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.520 --> 18:25.400] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.400 --> 18:29.920] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the
[18:29.920 --> 18:34.120] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.120 --> 18:39.240] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.240 --> 18:41.200] Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.200 --> 18:46.920] For more information, please visit lulavlawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.920 --> 18:59.800] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:16.920 --> 19:42.480] Okay folks, we're back.
[19:42.480 --> 19:52.240] There's a very similar bill that's been introduced as one bill in New Hampshire and some of the
[19:52.240 --> 19:58.640] state legislators who are more ignorant I would say and not very smart are saying, well,
[19:58.640 --> 19:59.640] this is a federal issue.
[19:59.640 --> 20:00.640] No, it's not.
[20:00.640 --> 20:01.640] It's not a federal issue.
[20:01.640 --> 20:04.720] These airports, municipal airports are within the state jurisdiction.
[20:04.720 --> 20:06.480] This is a state issue.
[20:06.480 --> 20:07.480] All right.
[20:07.480 --> 20:12.560] So anyway, go ahead, Eddie, you were going to talk about the resolution.
[20:12.560 --> 20:20.080] Yeah, there is a third piece of legislation which is a House concurrent resolution and
[20:20.080 --> 20:26.600] basically this is a 10th Amendment behind kicking for the TSA is what this is in the
[20:26.600 --> 20:28.880] concurrent resolution.
[20:28.880 --> 20:35.480] It's not quite three pages long, but if I could, I'd like to read you some interesting
[20:35.480 --> 20:37.440] excerpts from it.
[20:37.440 --> 20:42.960] It goes into beginning to talk about who the TSA is and what they're doing and it's also
[20:42.960 --> 20:47.120] saying that when people go to these airports, they're either being forced into the irradiating
[20:47.120 --> 20:52.720] body scanners or they're being subjected to the physical sexual assaults by these people.
[20:52.720 --> 20:53.720] Hold on a second.
[20:53.720 --> 20:55.640] Let me read paragraph two.
[20:55.640 --> 20:56.640] Right.
[20:56.640 --> 21:02.800] Whereas at many airports, the TSA is now forcing passengers to submit to iridating scans and
[21:02.800 --> 21:09.120] visualizations of their bodies and those passengers who refuse scanning are subject to invasive
[21:09.120 --> 21:15.880] pat-downs, if performed by anyone outside the TSA, such action would be deemed criminal
[21:15.880 --> 21:16.880] in nature.
[21:16.880 --> 21:17.880] Cool.
[21:17.880 --> 21:18.880] Very cool.
[21:18.880 --> 21:19.880] Now-
[21:19.880 --> 21:20.880] I'm loving it.
[21:20.880 --> 21:28.720] At that moment, it jumps into a Fourth Amendment issue on unwarranted search and seizure by
[21:28.720 --> 21:34.600] civil government goes right into it and then it goes into how Texas Constitution, Article
[21:34.600 --> 21:40.600] 1, Section 9 mimics exactly what's in the federal constitution almost word for word
[21:40.600 --> 21:47.120] in that same protection of the people from that type of search and seizure.
[21:47.120 --> 21:54.400] It keeps going on down through here and it also says, one of my favorite arguments, whereas
[21:54.400 --> 22:01.120] Article 1, Section 29 of the Texas Constitution declares that everything in this bill of rights
[22:01.120 --> 22:07.120] is accepted out of the general powers of government and shall forever remain inviolent and all
[22:07.120 --> 22:11.720] laws contrary thereto or to the following provisions shall be void.
[22:11.720 --> 22:18.040] Now, I don't know who this legislator is, Dane Simpson, but I'm liking him.
[22:18.040 --> 22:20.200] I'm liking him too and I think-
[22:20.200 --> 22:24.720] He actually bothered to read the Texas Constitution for a change.
[22:24.720 --> 22:26.400] I'll see if I can get him on the air.
[22:26.400 --> 22:28.080] What's his first name?
[22:28.080 --> 22:29.800] I haven't got to look at that yet.
[22:29.800 --> 22:31.280] I haven't gone that far.
[22:31.280 --> 22:33.720] We'll look him up on the Texas legislative website.
[22:33.720 --> 22:34.720] Simpson.
[22:34.720 --> 22:36.120] I wonder what district he represents.
[22:36.120 --> 22:37.120] I like it.
[22:37.120 --> 22:38.800] I like it a lot.
[22:38.800 --> 22:42.000] Yeah, because on the website, they only give their last name.
[22:42.000 --> 22:43.520] I haven't looked any further than that.
[22:43.520 --> 22:47.920] I've been trying to read the legislation, so I haven't gone into details about everything
[22:47.920 --> 22:53.640] on the legislator that authored it yet, but basically this concurrent resolution goes
[22:53.640 --> 23:00.560] on to cite a United States Supreme Court, United States versus Guess held that the right
[23:00.560 --> 23:04.240] to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without the
[23:04.240 --> 23:07.400] due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.
[23:07.400 --> 23:11.800] The constitutional right to travel from one state to another and necessarily to use the
[23:11.800 --> 23:17.880] highways and other instrumentalities of interstate commerce in doing so occupies the position
[23:17.880 --> 23:21.320] fundamental to the concept of our federal union.
[23:21.320 --> 23:27.240] Not only does this mean that TSA's authority to put you on a no-fly list will be nonexistent
[23:27.240 --> 23:34.080] in a Texas airport at least, but here these legislators have recognized one of the primary
[23:34.080 --> 23:42.400] cases that completely negates anybody's necessity to be under the transportation code that's
[23:42.400 --> 23:43.920] not engaged in commerce.
[23:43.920 --> 23:44.920] I love it.
[23:44.920 --> 23:46.360] This case is used for that purpose.
[23:46.360 --> 23:47.360] I love it.
[23:47.360 --> 23:54.480] David Simpson, he represents District 7, which is along, it's kind of a swath along I-20
[23:54.480 --> 23:55.480] just north of Tyler.
[23:55.480 --> 23:56.480] It doesn't include Tyler.
[23:56.480 --> 23:58.960] So it's kind of a rural area, but... That's good.
[23:58.960 --> 24:04.200] That's my area of the woods over there, Tyler is 65 miles north of me, so... Yeah.
[24:04.200 --> 24:05.200] Okay.
[24:05.200 --> 24:09.560] Now, the graphic body scans that the Transportation Security Administration has implemented as
[24:09.560 --> 24:14.840] well as the intimate physical searches that are offered as the only alternative are inappropriate,
[24:14.840 --> 24:20.080] unacceptable, and unconstitutional, and these procedures must be stopped.
[24:20.080 --> 24:27.280] Now, therefore, be it resolved that the 82nd Legislature of the State of Texas hereby express
[24:27.280 --> 24:33.520] its strong opposition to Transportation Security Administration searches that involve irradiation,
[24:33.520 --> 24:39.320] scanning, visualization, or groping, and its position that such searches are a violation
[24:39.320 --> 24:44.920] of the Bill of Rights of both the United States Constitution and the Texas Constitution, and
[24:44.920 --> 24:49.920] the law authorizing these searches should be considered void and as having no force
[24:49.920 --> 24:51.480] of law.
[24:51.480 --> 24:57.040] And be it further resolved that the 82nd Texas Legislature hereby urge the Transportation
[24:57.040 --> 25:03.040] Security Administration to immediately cease unwarranted and invasive searches at all security
[25:03.040 --> 25:10.920] checkpoints, whether in airports or otherwise, that arraignate, scan, visualize, and or grope
[25:10.920 --> 25:16.040] the bodies of citizens who possess a fundamental right to travel and have been guaranteed the
[25:16.040 --> 25:17.680] same by their civil covenants.
[25:17.680 --> 25:20.080] This is written by the Simpson guy, too?
[25:20.080 --> 25:21.080] A Simpson guy.
[25:21.080 --> 25:22.080] I love him.
[25:22.080 --> 25:23.080] I love him.
[25:23.080 --> 25:24.080] It ain't Homer.
[25:24.080 --> 25:25.960] I love it.
[25:25.960 --> 25:27.480] This is actually intelligent.
[25:27.480 --> 25:28.480] Okay.
[25:28.480 --> 25:32.200] Has this actually been put before the Senate?
[25:32.200 --> 25:33.200] The House?
[25:33.200 --> 25:34.200] It was...
[25:34.200 --> 25:35.200] This is the House Bill?
[25:35.200 --> 25:37.400] It was filed the first of this month.
[25:37.400 --> 25:38.400] Okay.
[25:38.400 --> 25:44.160] So it hasn't, like, it hasn't got passed out of committee yet or anything?
[25:44.160 --> 25:45.160] I don't see.
[25:45.160 --> 25:47.360] I haven't seen what the actions on it are.
[25:47.360 --> 25:49.560] The actions, it's been filed.
[25:49.560 --> 25:50.560] That's it.
[25:50.560 --> 25:51.560] Okay.
[25:51.560 --> 25:52.560] You know what, folks?
[25:52.560 --> 25:56.760] This is House Bill 1937, 1937.
[25:56.760 --> 25:58.840] Here's what everybody needs to do.
[25:58.840 --> 26:07.600] You register on the Texas legislative website, and you can get email updates for certain
[26:07.600 --> 26:12.480] bills where they will let you know when they're coming up for committee hearing.
[26:12.480 --> 26:20.320] When this bill comes up for committee hearing, we need to jam pack that room, even if you
[26:20.320 --> 26:23.160] don't put your name on the list to speak.
[26:23.160 --> 26:28.200] When it comes time for the committee hearing, that's when there's public input on this bill.
[26:28.200 --> 26:29.200] Okay.
[26:29.200 --> 26:32.400] So everybody needs to sign up on the Texas legislative website.
[26:32.400 --> 26:41.760] It's legis.state.tx.us, and you'll see where to register, and you put in your email address
[26:41.760 --> 26:47.240] for bill alerts, and then you can put in there for all kinds of different bills, any bill
[26:47.240 --> 26:52.800] that you want, or you can be alerted for different committees, for committee alerts.
[26:52.800 --> 26:57.160] If you're interested in what's going on with a certain committee, they'll send you emails
[26:57.160 --> 27:01.760] when a certain committee is having hearings on whatever they happen to have your hearings
[27:01.760 --> 27:02.760] on.
[27:02.760 --> 27:06.560] So you can register for committee alerts and for specific bill alerts.
[27:06.560 --> 27:14.080] Everybody needs to sign up and get their email registered on this Texas legislative website
[27:14.080 --> 27:19.940] so you can get the bill alert for House Bill 1937, and when they have the committee hearing,
[27:19.940 --> 27:25.480] we need to go down there and we need to fill that room and have as many people get up there
[27:25.480 --> 27:29.320] and give public input supporting this bill as possible.
[27:29.320 --> 27:32.660] Even if you don't speak, you need to get your booty down there.
[27:32.660 --> 27:38.760] And before that, send them emails to every legislator, every legislator in the House
[27:38.760 --> 27:44.000] and Senate voicing your approval, whether they're your legislator or not.
[27:44.000 --> 27:45.720] They need to get input.
[27:45.720 --> 27:51.960] They need to get input, and I would say even more effective than emails is call them.
[27:51.960 --> 27:55.080] Call their offices and send them faxes.
[27:55.080 --> 27:57.800] And of course, when you call, you're not going to be able to talk to them.
[27:57.800 --> 27:59.680] Rarely will you be able to talk to them.
[27:59.680 --> 28:02.120] Sometimes the actual legislator will call you back.
[28:02.120 --> 28:08.120] You'll talk to their aides, but I have found that the legislative aides are very helpful.
[28:08.120 --> 28:09.780] They're very nice.
[28:09.780 --> 28:13.380] They will spend a lot of time on the phone with you, as much time as you want.
[28:13.380 --> 28:14.720] They'll call you back.
[28:14.720 --> 28:19.120] They'll pass along, if the legislator doesn't have time to talk to you, they'll say, well,
[28:19.120 --> 28:23.080] let me pass on the message and find out what he or she has to say in response and I'll
[28:23.080 --> 28:27.040] call you back, and they've always called me back.
[28:27.040 --> 28:31.920] The legislative aide will say, I talked to so-and-so, and he wanted me to call you back
[28:31.920 --> 28:35.720] and tell you such-and-such, and so don't be afraid to call these people.
[28:35.720 --> 28:37.640] Don't be afraid to go there.
[28:37.640 --> 28:40.640] They're our public servants, and like I said, the aides are very helpful.
[28:40.640 --> 28:41.640] They're very nice.
[28:41.640 --> 28:49.920] They want to help people, so everybody needs to hound their legislator about this, and
[28:49.920 --> 28:56.920] even ones that are not your representative, and here's what Robert Moreau tells people,
[28:56.920 --> 29:04.880] tells the legislative aides when he calls and faxes to legislators that are not of districts
[29:04.880 --> 29:08.720] where he's not a constituent, because what they'll always do is they'll say, well, you're
[29:08.720 --> 29:09.720] not my constituent.
[29:09.720 --> 29:13.400] I don't really need to talk to you, and so what Robert Moreau tells them is, well, let
[29:13.400 --> 29:14.520] me ask you something.
[29:14.520 --> 29:16.360] Do you take PAC money?
[29:16.360 --> 29:19.480] Do you take money from political action committees?
[29:19.480 --> 29:25.320] I'm sure you do, and if you do, and this is what you tell a legislative aide, if the legislator
[29:25.320 --> 29:31.360] that you work for takes PAC money, then y'all are taking money from outside your district.
[29:31.360 --> 29:35.280] That means you can listen to me even though I'm not in your district, and that usually
[29:35.280 --> 29:39.600] shuts them up pretty quick, and you don't have to be rude about it, but just point out
[29:39.600 --> 29:45.320] the fact that they do take money from outside their district, and so they do have a duty
[29:45.320 --> 29:49.400] to talk to people who are not in their district, so that's what I have to say about that.
[29:49.400 --> 29:51.520] All right, we'll be right back, folks.
[29:51.520 --> 29:54.680] Call in 512-646-1984.
[29:54.680 --> 29:57.200] We will be right back.
[29:57.200 --> 30:04.520] The Rule of Law Radio Network is proud to present a due process of law seminar hosted
[30:04.520 --> 30:06.400] by our own Eddie Craig.
[30:06.400 --> 30:10.760] Eddie is a former Nacogdoches County Sheriff's Deputy, and for the past 21 years he has studied
[30:10.760 --> 30:15.240] the due process of law and now offers his knowledge to you at a law seminar every Saturday
[30:15.240 --> 30:20.240] from three o'clock to six o'clock at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street
[30:20.240 --> 30:21.480] in Austin, Texas.
[30:21.480 --> 30:26.040] Admission is $20, so please make plans to come and sit with Eddie and learn for yourself
[30:26.040 --> 30:30.080] what the true intent of law really is.
[30:30.080 --> 30:33.720] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[30:33.720 --> 30:37.200] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[30:37.200 --> 30:38.640] Our liberty depends on it.
[30:38.640 --> 30:42.560] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[30:42.560 --> 30:45.120] one of your constitutional rights.
[30:45.120 --> 30:50.440] Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database
[30:50.440 --> 30:52.240] of your personal information.
[30:52.240 --> 30:53.400] That's creepy.
[30:53.400 --> 30:55.520] But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:55.520 --> 30:58.640] Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:58.640 --> 31:02.760] Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking
[31:02.760 --> 31:05.040] cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[31:05.040 --> 31:09.520] If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[31:09.520 --> 31:12.120] Great search results and total privacy.
[31:12.120 --> 31:15.280] Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:15.280 --> 31:18.160] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[31:18.160 --> 31:21.240] They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[31:21.240 --> 31:24.440] He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[31:24.440 --> 31:28.600] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment
[31:28.600 --> 31:30.200] was designed to prevent.
[31:30.200 --> 31:34.400] It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in
[31:34.400 --> 31:36.520] the days of our founding fathers.
[31:36.520 --> 31:38.200] Third party, Third Amendment?
[31:38.200 --> 31:39.200] Get it?
[31:39.200 --> 31:42.240] These are a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging.
[31:42.240 --> 31:46.160] Tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and re-read the Third Amendment.
[31:46.160 --> 32:14.160] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:16.160 --> 32:36.600] That's right.
[32:36.600 --> 32:37.600] The murder is liars.
[32:37.600 --> 32:43.000] We need some prosecutors to come help us and I think we're going to get it this time.
[32:43.000 --> 32:44.000] I'm telling you what.
[32:44.000 --> 32:47.480] The whole country is up in arms over TSA.
[32:47.480 --> 32:50.640] Everyone is angry at them.
[32:50.640 --> 32:52.080] Public servants are angry at them.
[32:52.080 --> 32:54.160] The general public is angry at them.
[32:54.160 --> 32:57.280] The states are fighting back against this.
[32:57.280 --> 33:01.520] Cities are kicking TSA out of the airports altogether.
[33:01.520 --> 33:06.440] Somehow I have a feeling if this bill passes into law, somehow I don't think we're going
[33:06.440 --> 33:12.720] to get a whole lot of friction or resistance from these prosecutors going after these guys.
[33:12.720 --> 33:19.080] I think this is our big chance and I really encourage everyone and I am definitely going
[33:19.080 --> 33:22.840] to log in and sign up to be on the bill list.
[33:22.840 --> 33:25.940] Like I said, you can get alerts from committees.
[33:25.940 --> 33:27.640] You can get alerts on specific bills.
[33:27.640 --> 33:28.920] I'm signing up.
[33:28.920 --> 33:30.200] Everyone needs to sign up.
[33:30.200 --> 33:36.800] I will try to stay on top of this as well as Eddie and myself and we will keep you posted
[33:36.800 --> 33:41.280] as to when the committee hearing is going to be on this bill.
[33:41.280 --> 33:45.120] We need to jam pack that room and people need to get up and talk.
[33:45.120 --> 33:50.760] We need to show overwhelming, unbelievable support for this bill that this is the will
[33:50.760 --> 33:53.600] of the people under no uncertain terms.
[33:53.600 --> 33:55.360] Okay, Eddie, please continue.
[33:55.360 --> 33:56.360] I'm loving this.
[33:56.360 --> 33:58.720] This is great.
[33:58.720 --> 34:05.320] The other part of this that I would like to point out is that Austin has a city ordinance
[34:05.320 --> 34:12.920] which they mic at the TSA water bottle case issue that they used against him.
[34:12.920 --> 34:19.360] This particular enactment will go a long way to quashing their ability to use that statute
[34:19.360 --> 34:25.600] or that ordinance against people because the ordinance itself is over broad and undefined.
[34:25.600 --> 34:31.440] It uses several terms such as intimidate that it does not define in that ordinance.
[34:31.440 --> 34:35.680] There is no state law backing this ordinance up either.
[34:35.680 --> 34:40.040] It's just one the city made up on their own.
[34:40.040 --> 34:43.960] One of the issues there is how do you define intimidate?
[34:43.960 --> 34:51.520] Take someone my size, for instance, standing up to someone Deborah's size and that individual
[34:51.520 --> 34:56.600] is damaging my property and I'm getting upset by it and I'm making it known.
[34:56.600 --> 34:58.960] Am I intimidating this individual?
[34:58.960 --> 35:04.880] Odds are that from their perspective, yes, I am, but am I doing it with an intent to
[35:04.880 --> 35:06.000] commit a harm?
[35:06.000 --> 35:07.000] No.
[35:07.000 --> 35:11.840] I am doing it to show my displeasure at their ineptitude and carelessness in the damaging
[35:11.840 --> 35:14.480] of my property.
[35:14.480 --> 35:23.600] Unless this intimidation is better defined, then it can't be used effectively if someone
[35:23.600 --> 35:29.920] knows how to argue back against it because you could call anything intimidation just
[35:29.920 --> 35:35.000] simply by being present I would be intimidating to someone that size if they knew they were
[35:35.000 --> 35:39.600] screwing up and they knew they were making me mad whether I showed it or not.
[35:39.600 --> 35:41.280] Well, Eddie, you are a pretty big guy.
[35:41.280 --> 35:43.280] You're pretty tall.
[35:43.280 --> 35:46.960] Well, but that doesn't mean I'm out to cause harm.
[35:46.960 --> 35:47.960] That's my point.
[35:47.960 --> 35:48.960] I know.
[35:48.960 --> 35:49.960] I know that.
[35:49.960 --> 35:54.160] If I was alone, I could fall under the definition of intimidating one of these five foot nothing
[35:54.160 --> 36:01.080] foreigners that work in the airport, especially when they cop an attitude and I cop one right
[36:01.080 --> 36:02.080] back.
[36:02.080 --> 36:06.760] I highly suggest that nobody try to intimidate Eddie, that's for sure.
[36:06.760 --> 36:09.400] There's more to this.
[36:09.400 --> 36:17.960] This is an area of federal preemption of state rights and at least there's someone in the
[36:17.960 --> 36:21.760] legislature who's willing to stand up.
[36:21.760 --> 36:28.620] If we can get the legislature of Texas to pass this law, it sends a very strong message
[36:28.620 --> 36:36.080] to the feds that they need to back out of state business and if we can get them to pass
[36:36.080 --> 36:43.280] this legislation, it will be easier to get them to pass more legislation further restricting
[36:43.280 --> 36:46.640] the power of the feds to come in and regulate the state.
[36:46.640 --> 36:50.320] I totally agree, but there is another issue and that goes to contract.
[36:50.320 --> 36:59.960] See, the thing is once municipalities contract TSA to run security, then they can basically
[36:59.960 --> 37:05.640] just about do whatever they want absent of some overriding state law like what looks
[37:05.640 --> 37:07.840] like is about to be passed.
[37:07.840 --> 37:15.880] The real issue is, hey, city councils, hey people, your city councils are the ones who
[37:15.880 --> 37:19.640] let TSA into your airport.
[37:19.640 --> 37:25.760] The city councils are the ones that are responsible for this ultimately and ultimately if we really
[37:25.760 --> 37:33.720] want this nonsense to stop, we need to force our city councils to kick TSA out of the airports
[37:33.720 --> 37:39.760] and we need to put the onus where it belongs which is on the airliners, it's their airplanes,
[37:39.760 --> 37:43.280] they are the ones that are ultimately responsible for keeping them safe.
[37:43.280 --> 37:47.440] They need to be hiring their own security for the airports, the taxpayers shouldn't
[37:47.440 --> 37:52.680] even be having to pay for it and that's one of the reasons why the cities let TSA come
[37:52.680 --> 37:57.960] in and do this because they don't have to pay for it and if we don't use the big excuses,
[37:57.960 --> 38:03.160] if we don't use TSA, well then the city is going to have to pay for the security.
[38:03.160 --> 38:07.960] Well a lot of cities are kicking TSA out and they are having to pay for security but ultimately
[38:07.960 --> 38:10.160] the taxpayers really shouldn't have to be paying for the security.
[38:10.160 --> 38:14.640] This is a private enterprise, the airliners should be paying for it and so that's where
[38:14.640 --> 38:17.240] I would like to see this head.
[38:17.240 --> 38:21.240] Well if I may, I don't mean to be argumentative but I want to disagree with you just a little
[38:21.240 --> 38:22.920] bit.
[38:22.920 --> 38:29.240] The fact that someone allows TSA in doesn't preempt the necessity of the federal government
[38:29.240 --> 38:32.040] abiding by the laws of the state while they are there.
[38:32.040 --> 38:34.440] Well right and I did say that, I mean maybe I wasn't clear enough.
[38:34.440 --> 38:39.640] Well yeah but you are talking about a specific preemptive law, well every law preempts what
[38:39.640 --> 38:41.040] they are doing.
[38:41.040 --> 38:45.080] Every state has laws against what they are already doing.
[38:45.080 --> 38:51.600] They were already committing crimes the moment they began touching people, the moment they
[38:51.600 --> 38:57.040] began irradiating people against their will, they were committing crimes.
[38:57.040 --> 39:02.960] Any private individual doing what any member of the TSA has been doing would be on the
[39:02.960 --> 39:07.260] sexual offenders list and in prison.
[39:07.260 --> 39:12.360] No question about that, just like this legislation brings up, that should have been what we were
[39:12.360 --> 39:17.400] arguing about all along, that's what we should have been stomping all over these state prosecutors
[39:17.400 --> 39:19.680] to do something about.
[39:19.680 --> 39:24.240] The prosecutors did not have to wait for legislation like this to act.
[39:24.240 --> 39:28.800] That's where I am up in saying that if we can count on them to do what they are supposed
[39:28.800 --> 39:29.800] to do.
[39:29.800 --> 39:37.240] There is already state laws that would have allowed them to do plenty, they just wouldn't.
[39:37.240 --> 39:42.800] So the question is going to become, are we going to be able to do any more to make them
[39:42.800 --> 39:48.320] do their job than what they already had available to them?
[39:48.320 --> 39:54.640] I mean the fact that the public finally has to pressure anybody into this is absolutely
[39:54.640 --> 39:56.600] beyond me.
[39:56.600 --> 40:01.520] These are the people we hired and put into office and elected to watch out for these
[40:01.520 --> 40:07.600] laws and to make sure that nobody broke them no matter who they worked for and all this
[40:07.600 --> 40:12.440] time TSA has been doing exactly that in every state of the union.
[40:12.440 --> 40:17.920] And nobody has tried to prosecute one of them, why?
[40:17.920 --> 40:24.080] Well actually there is a DA in California that is, he has gone on the record on Alex
[40:24.080 --> 40:28.920] Jones' show and on other mainstream media saying anybody that brings any complaint to
[40:28.920 --> 40:34.080] him regarding TSA agent over these issues that he will prosecute him.
[40:34.080 --> 40:38.520] So we got at least one person, we got at least one DA who is stepping up.
[40:38.520 --> 40:40.720] Yeah but let's see, there has been what?
[40:40.720 --> 40:47.040] Three lawsuits filed in California by attorneys who went through the airport and were personally
[40:47.040 --> 40:48.040] accosted.
[40:48.040 --> 40:55.360] It took those attorneys filing suits to their own behalf and those of their kids and families
[40:55.360 --> 41:02.640] before even that prosecuting attorney stood up to do something.
[41:02.640 --> 41:07.520] I mean that's why we created these government agencies was to protect our rights and our
[41:07.520 --> 41:09.280] property.
[41:09.280 --> 41:14.440] They should have been on this long before it ever got to this point is my personal opinion.
[41:14.440 --> 41:15.760] That's what we put them in place.
[41:15.760 --> 41:18.080] We need to vote them out.
[41:18.080 --> 41:20.200] We need to put them in front of grand juries.
[41:20.200 --> 41:21.200] Except for Simpson.
[41:21.200 --> 41:22.200] Except for Simpson.
[41:22.200 --> 41:27.520] Well odds are Simpson is brand new elected or he wouldn't have bought this to the forefront
[41:27.520 --> 41:28.960] I guarantee you.
[41:28.960 --> 41:34.080] He must not have learned how the game is to be played yet.
[41:34.080 --> 41:37.160] Well maybe we can step in and give him some assistance.
[41:37.160 --> 41:43.360] Like I said, let's get everybody sign up on the bill watch list on the Texas Legislative
[41:43.360 --> 41:52.680] website and when this bill goes to committee it's time for us to show our support.
[41:52.680 --> 41:54.160] I'm all for it.
[41:54.160 --> 41:55.160] Good.
[41:55.160 --> 41:56.160] Wonderful.
[41:56.160 --> 42:03.720] And if we can begin to drive a wedge under federal preemption we have a chance of thwarting
[42:03.720 --> 42:07.800] a lot of the big guys plans.
[42:07.800 --> 42:13.240] But to get that wedge in place we've got to remove the corn cob from the tightly clenched
[42:13.240 --> 42:19.080] butts of our apathetic public service.
[42:19.080 --> 42:20.240] And we can do it people.
[42:20.240 --> 42:21.320] Look what happened in Egypt.
[42:21.320 --> 42:25.960] I just watched an interview with Alex Jones interviewing Max Kaiser.
[42:25.960 --> 42:28.480] He's over there in the Middle East right now.
[42:28.480 --> 42:31.600] And the people over there are dancing in the streets.
[42:31.600 --> 42:34.720] They staged a successful revolution.
[42:34.720 --> 42:41.000] They overthrew a dictator that had been oppressing them for decades, over 30 years, almost 40
[42:41.000 --> 42:42.000] years.
[42:42.000 --> 42:43.840] I mean people, things were really bad over there.
[42:43.840 --> 42:50.040] I was reading reports where folks were having to spend over 80% of their income.
[42:50.040 --> 42:53.040] That's 80% of their income on food.
[42:53.040 --> 42:54.040] Okay.
[42:54.040 --> 42:59.880] No wonder they were on the verge and ended up toppling this dictator.
[42:59.880 --> 43:05.000] And then apparently our government tried to put in a puppet dictator just a couple days
[43:05.000 --> 43:07.780] ago and the people said no, uh-uh, no more.
[43:07.780 --> 43:09.480] No more puppet dictators.
[43:09.480 --> 43:10.480] No more dictators.
[43:10.480 --> 43:12.520] We're choosing our own leader this time.
[43:12.520 --> 43:14.360] And there was hardly any violence.
[43:14.360 --> 43:19.880] I mean there were about 100 protesters killed a few weeks ago but you know everything happened
[43:19.880 --> 43:20.880] in one day.
[43:20.880 --> 43:24.560] And it all happened due to social networking.
[43:24.560 --> 43:28.360] Max Kaiser was saying he interviewed someone and said yeah one day we were just playing
[43:28.360 --> 43:32.960] video games on their computer and then the next day we're like hey man let's go take
[43:32.960 --> 43:34.160] this dictator down.
[43:34.160 --> 43:40.800] And they marched across the bridge into the capital a million strong and they made Mubarak
[43:40.800 --> 43:41.800] back down.
[43:41.800 --> 43:42.800] They made him leave.
[43:42.800 --> 43:48.800] So you know there are power in numbers and we do have the power to change things.
[43:48.800 --> 43:49.800] So I'm encouraged.
[43:49.800 --> 43:50.800] I'm encouraged.
[43:50.800 --> 43:51.800] Especially with this bill.
[43:51.800 --> 43:58.800] All right when we come back we're going to be taking your phone calls 512-646-1984.
[43:58.800 --> 44:07.880] More energy, stronger immune power, improved sense of well-being.
[44:07.880 --> 44:10.960] How many supplements have you heard boast of these benefits?
[44:10.960 --> 44:17.200] The team behind Shentrician believes that supplements should over deliver on their promises
[44:17.200 --> 44:20.680] and Shentrician does just that.
[44:20.680 --> 44:25.040] Shentrician utilizes the ancient healing wisdom of Chinese medicine.
[44:25.040 --> 44:30.240] In conjunction with the science of modern nutrition adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing
[44:30.240 --> 44:36.600] component and organic hemp protein in greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient
[44:36.600 --> 44:37.600] base.
[44:37.600 --> 44:41.880] Plus Shentrician tastes great in just water.
[44:41.880 --> 44:47.400] This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product and it's all natural.
[44:47.400 --> 44:55.840] Visit Shentrician.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436.
[44:55.840 --> 45:00.880] After you use Shentrician you'll believe in supplements again.
[45:00.880 --> 45:07.200] At hempusa.org we offer chemical free products to people around the world detoxifying, self
[45:07.200 --> 45:09.840] healing while rebuilding the immune system.
[45:09.840 --> 45:15.840] We urge our listeners to please consider our largest selling product, micro plant powder.
[45:15.840 --> 45:20.800] Our micro plant powder is rich in silica and probiotics to help rebuild the immune system
[45:20.800 --> 45:23.760] and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[45:23.760 --> 45:28.040] Micro plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage
[45:28.040 --> 45:29.040] shelter.
[45:29.040 --> 45:34.080] We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org and remember all of our products
[45:34.080 --> 45:36.240] are chemical free and healthy to eat.
[45:36.240 --> 45:41.040] We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality and rapid shipping
[45:41.040 --> 45:45.680] anywhere and we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the US.
[45:45.680 --> 45:54.560] Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-69-12608, that's 908-69-12608.
[45:54.560 --> 46:16.920] See what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[46:16.920 --> 46:38.760] Okay folks, we're back.
[46:38.760 --> 46:42.640] We're going to start taking our calls in just a minute and Eddie, just to go back to what
[46:42.640 --> 46:48.200] you were saying, I agree with you that these guys had already been violating state law.
[46:48.200 --> 46:54.080] I mean, even there was an attorney in Colorado that sued over the naked body scanners for
[46:54.080 --> 46:57.000] violations of child pornography laws and such.
[46:57.000 --> 47:01.200] They already have been violating law, that's true, but what I meant about the contractual
[47:01.200 --> 47:07.960] agreement is that it's the city councils that are the ones that allowed the TSA to be brought
[47:07.960 --> 47:09.640] into these airports in the first place.
[47:09.640 --> 47:16.320] And so they do have a certain degree of responsibility and liability here because they started it.
[47:16.320 --> 47:18.160] Well, yeah, exactly, culpability too then.
[47:18.160 --> 47:23.720] Yeah, they're culpable because they allowed these criminals into the municipal airports
[47:23.720 --> 47:27.440] in the first place and that was mainly the point I was trying to make.
[47:27.440 --> 47:33.000] But yeah, it's true, they already had been violating state laws all along.
[47:33.000 --> 47:38.400] I mean, if you threw a party at your nice house for a whole bunch of rich friends, knowing
[47:38.400 --> 47:42.640] they were all going to come wearing their best finery, their jewelry, their watches,
[47:42.640 --> 47:49.120] their wallets, and then you hire a bunch of pickpockets to cater the event, knowing they
[47:49.120 --> 47:56.280] were pickpockets and fully expecting to benefit from what they steal during the course of
[47:56.280 --> 48:02.160] the party, why aren't you criminally liable for everything they did while they were at
[48:02.160 --> 48:06.120] the party and picking pockets and lifting watches and jewelry?
[48:06.120 --> 48:09.680] I think that you absolutely would be liable for that.
[48:09.680 --> 48:15.280] Why isn't the city council involved in this just as much as the TSA?
[48:15.280 --> 48:16.280] Well, they should be.
[48:16.280 --> 48:18.400] They absolutely should be.
[48:18.400 --> 48:23.800] And these lawsuits, in all these lawsuits that are going on against TSA, the city council
[48:23.800 --> 48:26.520] should be co-defendants, should be named as co-defendants.
[48:26.520 --> 48:27.520] Absolutely.
[48:27.520 --> 48:32.200] There's no question about it because the reason that the city councils allowed this to go
[48:32.200 --> 48:37.000] on in the first place was basically so that they wouldn't have to pay for security at
[48:37.000 --> 48:38.000] the airport.
[48:38.000 --> 48:43.520] Federal grant money, they're receiving a part of the money stolen for the pickpocketing
[48:43.520 --> 48:44.520] at the party.
[48:44.520 --> 48:45.520] That too.
[48:45.520 --> 48:46.520] It's kickback time.
[48:46.520 --> 48:47.520] Kickback time.
[48:47.520 --> 48:49.240] They are just as culpable.
[48:49.240 --> 48:53.960] Just as culpable, and that goes back to my other point about that the airliners should
[48:53.960 --> 48:58.160] be the ones paying for the security anyway because it's their airplanes.
[48:58.160 --> 49:02.160] So anyway, I do agree with you, but like I said, the point about the contracting that
[49:02.160 --> 49:06.280] I was making is just that I just want to make the point that it's the city councils that
[49:06.280 --> 49:10.920] brought the criminals into the party in the first place.
[49:10.920 --> 49:12.920] And they are pickpockets, by the way.
[49:12.920 --> 49:16.080] I don't know folks out there, have you been reading about all the criminal activity of
[49:16.080 --> 49:20.720] these TSA agents, but they have been stealing from people.
[49:20.720 --> 49:24.360] They've been stealing items out of their bags as they go through security.
[49:24.360 --> 49:27.360] They've been stealing cash.
[49:27.360 --> 49:31.280] While there is something else they're planning on stealing here, if they get in for very
[49:31.280 --> 49:36.000] much longer, they have now implemented a new checkpoint regulation.
[49:36.000 --> 49:45.360] This company has invented a portable DNA scan device that they're going to send out to TSA
[49:45.360 --> 49:50.240] locations to be used, and they're going to demand that you allow them to take a DNA swab
[49:50.240 --> 49:53.280] of your mouth to run through this scanner.
[49:53.280 --> 49:58.240] This legislation deals with that by dealing with an invasion of a person's mouth.
[49:58.240 --> 50:00.240] Oh, it does.
[50:00.240 --> 50:01.240] Yes it does.
[50:01.240 --> 50:02.240] Good.
[50:02.240 --> 50:04.160] But that's what they're attempting to do.
[50:04.160 --> 50:10.680] So folks, not only are they now trying to say that they're dealing with the trafficking
[50:10.680 --> 50:18.880] of persons and illegal immigration through DNA checks, which I'm not quite sure how Austin
[50:18.880 --> 50:26.520] Municipal Airport with a DNA check would stand any chance in hell of stopping illegal immigration,
[50:26.520 --> 50:32.760] but this is the cover con that they're putting in place to say why they're having to do it.
[50:32.760 --> 50:37.880] Well, you know that what they're really planning, and this has been released in mainstream media,
[50:37.880 --> 50:42.760] that they're planning on rolling out these Viper teams where TSA, they're just going
[50:42.760 --> 50:49.440] to be roaming the streets of the cities of this country like thugs setting up these federal
[50:49.440 --> 50:54.600] TSA checkpoints with the DNA scans and blood draws and all this kind of stuff.
[50:54.600 --> 50:56.600] I mean, we have to stop this, folks.
[50:56.600 --> 50:58.440] We have to stop it.
[50:58.440 --> 51:01.920] I mean, it's just, it's gone beyond beyond.
[51:01.920 --> 51:04.160] So anyways.
[51:04.160 --> 51:07.400] I think Texas needs a new hunting license.
[51:07.400 --> 51:13.240] No bag limit TSA.
[51:13.240 --> 51:14.240] Okay.
[51:14.240 --> 51:15.480] All righty.
[51:15.480 --> 51:19.000] So now let's get some caller's takes on this issue.
[51:19.000 --> 51:20.480] We got Stan from Texas.
[51:20.480 --> 51:25.080] Stan, I think you may have had a question on another issue, but before we go to your question,
[51:25.080 --> 51:26.160] give us some feedback.
[51:26.160 --> 51:30.640] What do you think about all this TSA stuff and this bill that's been proposed in the
[51:30.640 --> 51:31.640] state legislature?
[51:31.640 --> 51:40.360] Well, I agree with the comment that the one gentleman said that that touches junk.
[51:40.360 --> 51:42.480] And that's the way I feel about it.
[51:42.480 --> 51:45.320] You know, that's, that's my privacy.
[51:45.320 --> 51:47.480] There's no need for that.
[51:47.480 --> 51:55.760] They can very easily, if there's such skilled people for determining who might be sneaking
[51:55.760 --> 52:00.320] something on the plane, it seems that they do a better job of searching people that are
[52:00.320 --> 52:06.760] very unlikely, like people in wheelchairs, little babies, than they are the people that
[52:06.760 --> 52:09.280] might be the ones trying to sneak something on.
[52:09.280 --> 52:18.080] So I will now remember now we're dealing with people with a KFC employee IQ here.
[52:18.080 --> 52:22.200] And if you don't believe that, talk to a couple of them.
[52:22.200 --> 52:28.960] I have actually had an interesting story going through the airport in Denver, Colorado.
[52:28.960 --> 52:33.280] My daughter, we live in Texas, and my daughter lives in Denver.
[52:33.280 --> 52:40.280] My daughter gave my wife one of those globes that has the liquid inside it.
[52:40.280 --> 52:46.080] And it obviously had more than, I don't know, the 3.4 ounces.
[52:46.080 --> 52:49.840] She didn't want to pack in her luggage because she was concerned that it would get broken.
[52:49.840 --> 52:53.480] So we tried to take it through security.
[52:53.480 --> 53:00.480] And we got into discussion about that, and they informed my wife that she had to check
[53:00.480 --> 53:02.920] that item.
[53:02.920 --> 53:09.680] My wife explained why if a sealed globe, there's no way that we could be doing anything with
[53:09.680 --> 53:10.680] it.
[53:10.680 --> 53:16.120] But before the discussion ended, the guy basically threatened me that if I said one more thing,
[53:16.120 --> 53:18.940] I was not going to get onto the flight.
[53:18.940 --> 53:22.280] And as a result of that, they wasted enough of our time.
[53:22.280 --> 53:25.360] We nearly missed the flight, but we did make it.
[53:25.360 --> 53:29.440] But again, it's part of the intimidation that they like to do.
[53:29.440 --> 53:33.120] So did they steal the globe, or did they let you take it?
[53:33.120 --> 53:35.360] We had to pack it.
[53:35.360 --> 53:43.880] And actually, the airlines did a nice job of helping give us something that padded it
[53:43.880 --> 53:48.280] adequately that it did survive the trip being checked.
[53:48.280 --> 53:49.280] That's awesome.
[53:49.280 --> 53:51.760] At least the airliners were helpful.
[53:51.760 --> 53:56.520] I mean, obviously, all this TSA stuff and the naked body scanners and all the sexual
[53:56.520 --> 53:57.520] molestation.
[53:57.520 --> 53:58.520] I mean, it's completely unnecessary.
[53:58.520 --> 54:03.960] I just read an article yesterday about the police being up in arms because there was
[54:03.960 --> 54:10.800] a situation where a man, and it says that it was an accident, he actually made it onto
[54:10.800 --> 54:14.760] the plane with three box cutter knives.
[54:14.760 --> 54:19.360] And the only way that it got found out was that it fell out of his luggage, out of his
[54:19.360 --> 54:23.920] carry-on bag while he was on the plane, and the flight attendant noticed it, and he apologized
[54:23.920 --> 54:29.520] profusely and said he was sorry that he uses those kinds of tools for his job, and he just
[54:29.520 --> 54:32.920] forgot to take them out of that particular bag.
[54:32.920 --> 54:39.160] But I mean, it just goes to show, I mean, wasn't the TSA brought into being and on all
[54:39.160 --> 54:45.960] of this outrageous invasive measures in the name of security, wasn't all this the big
[54:45.960 --> 54:52.520] excuse for an incident involving alleged box cutters, you know, about 10 years ago?
[54:52.520 --> 54:56.400] Hmm, that's what I thought, and now here's the box cutters going on the planes again.
[54:56.400 --> 55:02.560] So I mean, it just shows this has absolutely nothing to do with security, and it has everything
[55:02.560 --> 55:08.240] to do with conditioning the public to just accept whatever the government wants to do
[55:08.240 --> 55:09.240] to them.
[55:09.240 --> 55:16.920] I mean, if you'll take this, people, you'll put up with anything.
[55:16.920 --> 55:19.880] This is classic textbook psychological conditioning.
[55:19.880 --> 55:20.880] That's all it is.
[55:20.880 --> 55:24.160] You just have to recognize it for what it is and say no.
[55:24.160 --> 55:27.160] So anyways, so what else you got for us, Stan?
[55:27.160 --> 55:31.600] Well, it's another abuse of power by a municipality.
[55:31.600 --> 55:39.200] I received a traffic citation when I was exiting ICE 35 in New Bronzeville, and I was on the
[55:39.200 --> 55:45.800] access road and was cited for exceeding the posted speed limit.
[55:45.800 --> 55:53.720] I threw a friend of mine, and probably as a result of your show, he suggested that I
[55:53.720 --> 55:54.720] fight it.
[55:54.720 --> 56:01.920] So I filed a motion to have this case dismissed or have my traffic citation dismissed on the
[56:01.920 --> 56:08.200] basis that they didn't have any jurisdiction to rule on this.
[56:08.200 --> 56:18.400] So I ended up then getting a receive a notice from the New Bronzeville municipal court to
[56:18.400 --> 56:21.280] appear for a pretrial hearing.
[56:21.280 --> 56:28.400] I've had my pretrial hearing before the prosecutor.
[56:28.400 --> 56:30.560] You actually go in the courtroom.
[56:30.560 --> 56:40.840] There is a judge in the courtroom that basically is there, and there were probably 12 people
[56:40.840 --> 56:46.120] that were going there for some similar citation or something.
[56:46.120 --> 56:52.920] The judge informed everyone that she could not dismiss anyone's citation.
[56:52.920 --> 56:59.680] She was simply there for the purpose that if they entered a plea, that she would discuss
[56:59.680 --> 57:02.600] their plea, the repercussions of it.
[57:02.600 --> 57:04.120] I met with the prosecutor.
[57:04.120 --> 57:10.000] The prosecutor said that she had not even read the motion that I had given them.
[57:10.000 --> 57:16.960] She did go, and she basically looked at me as if, well, you know, I haven't read this,
[57:16.960 --> 57:19.600] but why don't you go ahead and enter a plea anyway?
[57:19.600 --> 57:24.040] And I said, I do not want to enter a plea.
[57:24.040 --> 57:28.240] And we had probably a discussion for about five minutes, and she said, well, I will go
[57:28.240 --> 57:30.000] and discuss this with the judge.
[57:30.000 --> 57:32.360] So she did discuss it with the judge.
[57:32.360 --> 57:41.600] What they ended up doing, they said that we can, at this point, we will not have any more
[57:41.600 --> 57:43.160] discussion about this.
[57:43.160 --> 57:51.360] What we need to do is to have you come back at a future date for another hearing in front
[57:51.360 --> 57:55.520] of the judge with the prosecutor being present.
[57:55.520 --> 58:02.040] Molly was there in the courtroom waiting for them to set that future date.
[58:02.040 --> 58:13.200] The judge ended up drawing up a cause number or a case that said that, and they had some
[58:13.200 --> 58:22.840] girl by the name of Terry Riviera sign it as the affiant, that I had exceeded the speed
[58:22.840 --> 58:23.840] limit.
[58:23.840 --> 58:25.840] The speed was unreasonable.
[58:25.840 --> 58:28.880] Yeah, I've looked at your complaints and everything.
[58:28.880 --> 58:32.880] We're about to go to break, but if you'll hang on, I have looked at your paperwork.
[58:32.880 --> 58:36.560] I want to talk to you about exactly what's going on and what to do about it.
[58:36.560 --> 58:37.560] Fantastic.
[58:37.560 --> 58:38.560] That'd be great.
[58:38.560 --> 58:41.440] So if you'll hang on, we'll get to you here on the other side of the break.
[58:41.440 --> 58:46.600] Okay, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, Eddie Craig, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens.
[58:46.600 --> 58:49.160] We're about to go to break, but we'll be back here shortly.
[58:49.160 --> 58:52.200] This is our four-hour marathon, so please hang in there with us.
[58:52.200 --> 59:00.280] We'll take your calls on the other side.
[59:00.280 --> 59:05.680] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[59:05.680 --> 59:08.480] because they struggle to understand it.
[59:08.480 --> 59:13.880] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:13.880 --> 59:17.120] the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:17.120 --> 59:18.960] Enter the recovery version.
[59:18.960 --> 59:24.840] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:24.840 --> 59:28.560] than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:28.560 --> 59:33.560] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:33.560 --> 59:38.280] into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:38.280 --> 59:43.420] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:43.420 --> 59:53.880] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:53.880 --> 59:57.960] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:57.960 --> 59:58.960] That's freestudybible.com.
[59:58.960 --> 01:00:05.080] This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[01:00:05.080 --> 01:00:09.200] Thousands of anti-government demonstrators Friday chanted slogans outside the headquarters
[01:00:09.200 --> 01:00:14.320] of Bahrain State Television in the capital of Manama against the Sunni dynasty that has
[01:00:14.320 --> 01:00:18.200] ruled the majority Shias for more than 200 years.
[01:00:18.200 --> 01:00:23.560] Shias are demanding a greater voice in national affairs and protesting widespread discrimination.
[01:00:23.560 --> 01:00:29.160] A Shia opposition leader Thursday called for Sunni-Shia harmony.
[01:00:29.160 --> 01:00:34.280] Prominent South Carolina union leader Kenny Riley called for a general strike Wednesday
[01:00:34.280 --> 01:00:39.520] in solidarity with public workers in Wisconsin who are battling a proposal to drastically
[01:00:39.520 --> 01:00:41.600] reduce collective bargaining rights.
[01:00:41.600 --> 01:00:46.120] Riley, who heads Charleston's International Longshoremen's Association, sees the bill
[01:00:46.120 --> 01:00:52.760] in Wisconsin as part of a Republican attack against unions across the country.
[01:00:52.760 --> 01:00:58.480] The latest NBC News Wall Street Journal poll has found Americans are adamantly opposed
[01:00:58.480 --> 01:01:04.240] to cuts in Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security and K-12 education.
[01:01:04.240 --> 01:01:10.360] More than 60 percent were concerned major cuts by Congress could impact their lives.
[01:01:10.360 --> 01:01:15.640] Barack Obama said Thursday he had ordered the U.S. military full capacity to act potentially
[01:01:15.640 --> 01:01:19.440] rapidly if the situation in Libya gets much worse.
[01:01:19.440 --> 01:01:24.280] Obama said the U.S. must act only in consultation with the international community.
[01:01:24.280 --> 01:01:29.360] Obama added U.S. interests were best served if it were not seen as engineering or imposing
[01:01:29.360 --> 01:01:35.080] a particular outcome, having raised the possibility of establishing a no-fly zone over Libya and
[01:01:35.080 --> 01:01:39.960] after moving warships into the Mediterranean, the U.S. and its allies appear to step back
[01:01:39.960 --> 01:01:44.760] from military intervention even as opposition forces in Libya continue to call for foreign
[01:01:44.760 --> 01:01:45.760] assistance.
[01:01:45.760 --> 01:01:51.160] The U.S., Britain, France, Canada and others have indicated they will participate if conditions
[01:01:51.160 --> 01:01:52.160] warranted.
[01:01:52.160 --> 01:01:55.000] Italy and Germany, among others, have said they would not.
[01:01:55.000 --> 01:02:00.360] Yusuf Sultan, who works at the oil refinery in Surat, said, if the Americans come, they
[01:02:00.360 --> 01:02:03.680] would steal our revolution.
[01:02:03.680 --> 01:02:07.600] Documents obtained by the New York Times reveal the Environmental Protection Agency planned
[01:02:07.600 --> 01:02:12.600] to call for a moratorium last year on the gas drilling technique known as hydrofracking
[01:02:12.600 --> 01:02:16.400] in New York City's watershed over fears of water contamination.
[01:02:16.400 --> 01:02:21.000] However, the recommendation was removed from the publicly released letter.
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:25.720] EPA emails and documents confirmed what activists have been saying for years, that industry
[01:02:25.720 --> 01:02:30.000] ties and political pressure have thwarted environmental enforcement.
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:35.760] In 2004, the EPA conducted a study of the environmental impact of hydrofracking as Congress
[01:02:35.760 --> 01:02:39.160] debated whether the process should be regulated.
[01:02:39.160 --> 01:02:44.360] An early draft of the study discussed potentially dangerous levels of contamination of an aquifer.
[01:02:44.360 --> 01:02:49.240] However, the report's final version concluded hydrofracking poses little or no threat to
[01:02:49.240 --> 01:02:51.240] drinking water.
[01:02:51.240 --> 01:03:20.000] Seven members of the study's peer review panel had ties to the oil and gas industry.
[01:03:20.000 --> 01:03:40.640] It's all according to the will of the Almighty, I read his book and it says it cares not for
[01:03:40.640 --> 01:03:41.640] the unsightly.
[01:03:41.640 --> 01:03:57.200] It's all according to the will of the Almighty, I read his book and it says it cares not for
[01:03:57.200 --> 01:03:58.200] the unsightly.
[01:03:58.200 --> 01:04:14.720] It's all according to the will of the Almighty, I read his book and it says it cares not for
[01:04:14.720 --> 01:04:15.720] the unsightly.
[01:04:15.720 --> 01:04:16.720] It's all according to the will of the Almighty, I read his book and it says it cares not for
[01:04:16.720 --> 01:04:17.720] the unsightly.
[01:04:17.720 --> 01:04:30.920] It's all according to the will of the Almighty, I read his book and it says it cares not for
[01:04:30.920 --> 01:04:32.020] the unsightly.
[01:04:32.020 --> 01:04:41.380] It's all according to the will of the Almighty, I read his book and it says it cares not for
[01:04:41.380 --> 01:04:44.520] the unsightly.
[01:04:44.520 --> 01:04:52.040] Well, I'm now going to need to go back to the court to have a hearing before the judge
[01:04:52.040 --> 01:04:58.840] with the prosecutor being present.
[01:04:58.840 --> 01:05:07.120] What I find very difficult is how the judge actually wrote up this complaint based off
[01:05:07.120 --> 01:05:08.320] of the citation.
[01:05:08.320 --> 01:05:12.080] The police officer was not even in attendance at this pretrial hearing.
[01:05:12.080 --> 01:05:13.080] Wait a minute.
[01:05:13.080 --> 01:05:14.080] Hold on.
[01:05:14.080 --> 01:05:20.880] Go to 28.01 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and read it.
[01:05:20.880 --> 01:05:22.160] Okay.
[01:05:22.160 --> 01:05:28.200] That section tells you what the judge can summon you to court for.
[01:05:28.200 --> 01:05:35.040] To talk to the prosecutor is not in the list.
[01:05:35.040 --> 01:05:42.000] That's called abuse of process, and it's a crime in Texas.
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:43.000] Even when a judge does it.
[01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:45.520] It's not the only issue that he's got going with this.
[01:05:45.520 --> 01:05:48.760] That's just one of them.
[01:05:48.760 --> 01:05:54.280] Now this is, let's see, this is San Marcos?
[01:05:54.280 --> 01:05:55.280] It's New Braunfels.
[01:05:55.280 --> 01:05:56.280] New Braunfels.
[01:05:56.280 --> 01:05:57.280] Okay.
[01:05:57.280 --> 01:06:01.040] Yeah, I looked at the notice they sent out to him, Randy.
[01:06:01.040 --> 01:06:06.580] They have another problem right there alone, and that is that this notice does not in any
[01:06:06.580 --> 01:06:11.680] way comport itself with the requirements of law under Chapter 23 as they summons to appear
[01:06:11.680 --> 01:06:13.600] in court.
[01:06:13.600 --> 01:06:16.800] It's not even close.
[01:06:16.800 --> 01:06:22.000] Now what you need to do as far as this information goes, based upon what I was looking at in
[01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:28.840] the complaint, the first thing is the complaint makes an allegation of a breach of the peace.
[01:06:28.840 --> 01:06:33.920] So the first thing you're going to want to do is challenge the complaint.
[01:06:33.920 --> 01:06:40.040] You're going to file what's called a motion to quash complaint, and in there you're going
[01:06:40.040 --> 01:06:47.280] to simply make the statement that the complaint contains facially and factually inaccurate
[01:06:47.280 --> 01:06:50.520] statements.
[01:06:50.520 --> 01:06:57.260] There's nothing in the law that requires you to tell them what is inaccurate or not factual
[01:06:57.260 --> 01:07:02.280] in the complaint, only that you complain about it.
[01:07:02.280 --> 01:07:09.640] That's all the law requires, and I filed that exact same type of motion to quash the complaint
[01:07:09.640 --> 01:07:15.600] in the case that the young lady won on this past Monday, or Tuesday rather.
[01:07:15.600 --> 01:07:21.160] We filed that same type of motion in her case because there was no question the complaint
[01:07:21.160 --> 01:07:29.640] contained gross misstatement of facts and so on and so forth, and this was continuing
[01:07:29.640 --> 01:07:36.000] on to the second iteration of the complaint that continued these factual misstatements.
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:41.360] So the one in particular we're dealing with is the fact that it accuses you of a breach
[01:07:41.360 --> 01:07:46.760] of the peace, which unless you actually hit someone did not occur, or unless you were
[01:07:46.760 --> 01:07:52.560] speeding into oncoming traffic did not occur.
[01:07:52.560 --> 01:07:54.560] I'm assuming none of those happened, right?
[01:07:54.560 --> 01:07:58.440] None of those happened, that's correct.
[01:07:58.440 --> 01:08:03.760] Now the other thing, your complaint specifically says that you were charged with speeding pursuant
[01:08:03.760 --> 01:08:12.160] transportation code section 545.352, which we knew that was the proper section.
[01:08:12.160 --> 01:08:19.840] However, the complaint alleges language that though it's a part of statute, the language
[01:08:19.840 --> 01:08:27.080] is not in 352, and that is the part where it says at a speed other than was reasonable
[01:08:27.080 --> 01:08:31.720] and prudent under the circumstances then existing.
[01:08:31.720 --> 01:08:42.400] That is the language of 545.351, and if you will read 351 subsection B, number one and
[01:08:42.400 --> 01:08:50.760] number two, you will see exactly what must be proven in order to show that the speed
[01:08:50.760 --> 01:08:54.240] was neither reasonable nor prudent.
[01:08:54.240 --> 01:09:01.680] The only way that can be done is to prove in B1 that you did not take into consideration
[01:09:01.680 --> 01:09:10.440] potential or existing hazards at the scene, and in B2 that your failure to observe the
[01:09:10.440 --> 01:09:19.000] existing or potential hazards described in B1 resulted in a collision with another vehicle
[01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:24.920] that was entering the highway in compliance with law.
[01:09:24.920 --> 01:09:27.440] Is there evidence of a collision?
[01:09:27.440 --> 01:09:28.440] None.
[01:09:28.440 --> 01:09:34.120] Then they got a problem.
[01:09:34.120 --> 01:09:42.000] So regardless of what the prosecutor attempts to prove in court, they must prove a collision
[01:09:42.000 --> 01:09:43.000] occurred.
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:45.680] Okay, wait a minute, wait a minute, hold on.
[01:09:45.680 --> 01:09:51.240] You have someone who prepared a criminal complaint?
[01:09:51.240 --> 01:09:52.240] I'm getting to that part.
[01:09:52.240 --> 01:09:53.240] Okay.
[01:09:53.240 --> 01:09:54.240] I'm getting to that part.
[01:09:54.240 --> 01:10:00.760] Right now I'm just helping him with his argument on this part, but if he actually tries to
[01:10:00.760 --> 01:10:06.240] prove that you just went faster than the posted speed limit and that's all he does prove,
[01:10:06.240 --> 01:10:12.640] then you stand up when he's done talking and say, I move the court for a directed verdict
[01:10:12.640 --> 01:10:15.760] of not guilty for the defense.
[01:10:15.760 --> 01:10:21.760] The state has failed to prove its case upon the record, and that's true.
[01:10:21.760 --> 01:10:24.920] They haven't proved it.
[01:10:24.920 --> 01:10:30.200] His statement that you were going faster than the posted speed limit is only a prima facie
[01:10:30.200 --> 01:10:31.920] case.
[01:10:31.920 --> 01:10:39.600] If you make the objection that the state can prove no collision occurred with another vehicle,
[01:10:39.600 --> 01:10:46.600] then he kept his prima facie cases blown out of the water, because now he must prove that
[01:10:46.600 --> 01:10:56.520] a collision did occur because the complaint alleges that one occurred, and it didn't.
[01:10:56.520 --> 01:11:00.320] Now let's get back to who signed this complaint.
[01:11:00.320 --> 01:11:05.040] My understanding from the person that gave me your information is that you immediately
[01:11:05.040 --> 01:11:11.680] went in and asked if the state trooper that had issued the citation was still on scene,
[01:11:11.680 --> 01:11:12.680] correct?
[01:11:12.680 --> 01:11:18.820] Yes, that's correct, and he was not present.
[01:11:18.820 --> 01:11:22.520] And they informed you that he had not been present.
[01:11:22.520 --> 01:11:26.360] He only comes in a couple of times a week, correct?
[01:11:26.360 --> 01:11:28.120] That is correct.
[01:11:28.120 --> 01:11:35.680] So both of these documents were signed and filed yesterday, correct?
[01:11:35.680 --> 01:11:39.400] Well, several days ago, but yes.
[01:11:39.400 --> 01:11:41.400] Well, they say the third.
[01:11:41.400 --> 01:11:44.160] That was yesterday.
[01:11:44.160 --> 01:11:47.120] The stamp on them says March 3rd.
[01:11:47.120 --> 01:11:52.280] Actually, I'm not sure which document you're looking at.
[01:11:52.280 --> 01:11:53.280] Mine was done on the 20th.
[01:11:53.280 --> 01:11:57.160] That's the complaint and the copy of the notice that was sent.
[01:11:57.160 --> 01:11:59.120] That's all I've got.
[01:11:59.120 --> 01:12:00.120] Okay.
[01:12:00.120 --> 01:12:02.560] Yes, that's correct.
[01:12:02.560 --> 01:12:03.560] Okay.
[01:12:03.560 --> 01:12:09.840] Now, the complaint says that the officer is the one that swore it out.
[01:12:09.840 --> 01:12:19.600] How could the officer have signed a complaint in front of a notary when he wasn't there?
[01:12:19.600 --> 01:12:27.800] And is the person that notarized this physically present in that same building?
[01:12:27.800 --> 01:12:35.280] If they are, then you have a forged complaint.
[01:12:35.280 --> 01:12:40.760] And you now have criminal charges against that notary and whoever tried to put that
[01:12:40.760 --> 01:12:50.280] officer's signature on that complaint.
[01:12:50.280 --> 01:12:56.760] Now the way I would back this up is please tell me that you were recording the conversation
[01:12:56.760 --> 01:13:00.160] when you talked to these courts and asked if he was present.
[01:13:00.160 --> 01:13:04.280] No, I did not record that conversation.
[01:13:04.280 --> 01:13:11.040] Any rule number one, do not ever go into public from this day forward without a personal recording
[01:13:11.040 --> 01:13:18.280] device in your possession that has fresh batteries and room to record, got it?
[01:13:18.280 --> 01:13:20.920] They will allow me to take a recorder into the courtroom.
[01:13:20.920 --> 01:13:22.720] You're going into a public building.
[01:13:22.720 --> 01:13:25.080] Who cares what they want to allow you to do?
[01:13:25.080 --> 01:13:28.920] They may not allow you to take it in the courtroom, but you're not going to court.
[01:13:28.920 --> 01:13:31.680] You're going to talk to the clerk.
[01:13:31.680 --> 01:13:38.720] They actually took me into the chamber of the court, and that's where they hold their
[01:13:38.720 --> 01:13:40.200] hearings.
[01:13:40.200 --> 01:13:45.600] Did they ask you if you have a personal recording device on your person?
[01:13:45.600 --> 01:13:50.320] Actually they didn't, but they wouldn't allow you to take your cell phones in, which my
[01:13:50.320 --> 01:13:51.320] cell phone...
[01:13:51.320 --> 01:13:57.600] Okay, but if they didn't ask you if you had a recording device and they didn't order you
[01:13:57.600 --> 01:14:05.160] not to record, you can do anything you want to as long as there's no law that specifically
[01:14:05.160 --> 01:14:07.160] forbids you from doing something.
[01:14:07.160 --> 01:14:10.480] So take it with you.
[01:14:10.480 --> 01:14:13.960] If they don't like it, let them object.
[01:14:13.960 --> 01:14:15.920] Just don't wave it in their face.
[01:14:15.920 --> 01:14:16.920] I suggest you take two.
[01:14:16.920 --> 01:14:18.680] You don't have to tell them you brought it in there.
[01:14:18.680 --> 01:14:21.780] You can just keep it in your pocket, turned on and recording.
[01:14:21.780 --> 01:14:22.780] Take two.
[01:14:22.780 --> 01:14:24.280] Take one that doesn't work and one that does.
[01:14:24.280 --> 01:14:27.920] So I'm the one that doesn't.
[01:14:27.920 --> 01:14:28.920] Right.
[01:14:28.920 --> 01:14:29.920] Okay.
[01:14:29.920 --> 01:14:30.920] All right.
[01:14:30.920 --> 01:14:36.920] But, in any case, if you did not get them recorded when they made this admission to
[01:14:36.920 --> 01:14:45.960] you, then you immediately need to find out where this officer was on duty that day, okay?
[01:14:45.960 --> 01:14:53.320] You need to call whatever depot he runs from and get his duty schedule and his locations
[01:14:53.320 --> 01:14:56.160] for the day in question.
[01:14:56.160 --> 01:15:06.000] What I suggest you do is you call and ask for whoever his major is and ask for the information
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:10.800] from the major or the major's clerk.
[01:15:10.800 --> 01:15:12.720] Everybody's afraid of the major.
[01:15:12.720 --> 01:15:17.880] So you call in and ask who the major is for this particular area and they'll direct you
[01:15:17.880 --> 01:15:23.600] to him and it's probably John Madden unless he's retired.
[01:15:23.600 --> 01:15:24.600] Okay.
[01:15:24.600 --> 01:15:30.120] Actually, John Madden is the head of all of the traffic division.
[01:15:30.120 --> 01:15:33.000] If he's still there, call in and ask for John Madden.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:37.520] If he has since retired, they will have replaced him and they'll give you his replacement.
[01:15:37.520 --> 01:15:38.520] Okay.
[01:15:38.520 --> 01:15:44.120] And ask your questions of him and he's going to tell you he's not the right guy, but he's
[01:15:44.120 --> 01:15:46.320] going to tell you who is.
[01:15:46.320 --> 01:15:52.560] And when you call the one who is, you tell them that John Madden sent you.
[01:15:52.560 --> 01:16:00.120] I had a friend, Leon Rhodes, who had a problem with DPS tearing the siding off the inside
[01:16:00.120 --> 01:16:05.280] of his reefer trailer looking for drugs and Leon told him he wasn't a drug dog to get
[01:16:05.280 --> 01:16:11.040] out of his trailer and he was upset because it damaged his trailer and I said, well, call
[01:16:11.040 --> 01:16:12.040] John Madden.
[01:16:12.040 --> 01:16:18.000] I said, Leon, you know that sweet, nice voice that you have?
[01:16:18.000 --> 01:16:19.200] He said, what sweet, nice voice?
[01:16:19.200 --> 01:16:21.880] He's like six foot seven and 500 pounds.
[01:16:21.880 --> 01:16:23.160] I said, yeah, that one.
[01:16:23.160 --> 01:16:24.160] Don't use that one.
[01:16:24.160 --> 01:16:26.160] Use your really PO'd voice.
[01:16:26.160 --> 01:16:28.400] Oh, I can do that.
[01:16:28.400 --> 01:16:31.880] He called me three days later and said, what did you get me into?
[01:16:31.880 --> 01:16:34.920] I've had about 50 DPS officers call me.
[01:16:34.920 --> 01:16:38.160] When you use the major's name, you get everybody's attention.
[01:16:38.160 --> 01:16:39.160] You won't get me crap.
[01:16:39.160 --> 01:16:44.880] Yeah, they were calling to repair his trailer is what it was.
[01:16:44.880 --> 01:16:45.880] Great.
[01:16:45.880 --> 01:16:46.880] Okay.
[01:16:46.880 --> 01:16:49.880] You got anything else, Stan?
[01:16:49.880 --> 01:16:52.880] No, I appreciate the information.
[01:16:52.880 --> 01:16:53.880] Thanks very much.
[01:16:53.880 --> 01:16:54.880] All right.
[01:16:54.880 --> 01:16:55.880] Thanks, Stan.
[01:16:55.880 --> 01:16:56.880] All right.
[01:16:56.880 --> 01:16:57.880] We'll take more of your calls on the other side.
[01:16:57.880 --> 01:17:00.880] We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.880 --> 01:17:05.640] Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals and coin supplies
[01:17:05.640 --> 01:17:07.560] in the Austin metro area.
[01:17:07.560 --> 01:17:09.360] We also ship worldwide.
[01:17:09.360 --> 01:17:13.200] We're a family owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin
[01:17:13.200 --> 01:17:14.200] and metals purchases.
[01:17:14.200 --> 01:17:19.080] Because of you, Austin, business has been so good that we've had to move to a new and
[01:17:19.080 --> 01:17:20.600] bigger location.
[01:17:20.600 --> 01:17:26.960] We're now located at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A, 1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous
[01:17:26.960 --> 01:17:27.960] location.
[01:17:27.960 --> 01:17:31.800] We're on the west side of Burnett Road in the Stanley Insurance Building on the ground
[01:17:31.800 --> 01:17:35.480] floor next to the Ishuban Sushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[01:17:35.480 --> 01:17:39.280] We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 5.
[01:17:39.280 --> 01:17:45.440] You're welcome to stop in during regular business hours or call 512-646-6440.
[01:17:45.440 --> 01:17:49.880] Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty
[01:17:49.880 --> 01:17:50.880] Radio.
[01:17:50.880 --> 01:17:56.400] That's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new location at 7304 Burnett Road Suite A or call
[01:17:56.400 --> 01:18:00.440] 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.440 --> 01:18:04.640] My name is Randall Kelton and I co-host on Rule of Law Radio.
[01:18:04.640 --> 01:18:09.440] We specialize in showing people how to strike back against corrupt public officials.
[01:18:09.440 --> 01:18:13.840] With the mortgage crisis worsening, we set our sights on finding a remedy for people
[01:18:13.840 --> 01:18:16.000] who have been cheated by their lenders.
[01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:20.160] If you have a mortgage or have paid yours off, you have probably been cheated out of
[01:18:20.160 --> 01:18:22.520] thousands, but there is a remedy.
[01:18:22.520 --> 01:18:31.800] Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call me at 512-430-4140 and find out how to use the
[01:18:31.800 --> 01:18:37.380] consumer protection laws to recover what the lenders have stolen through fraud and deception.
[01:18:37.380 --> 01:18:42.200] We will prepare for you a qualified written request that will expose the fraud and put
[01:18:42.200 --> 01:18:44.080] the lenders on the dime.
[01:18:44.080 --> 01:18:48.160] Lender fraud is bankrupting this country and it's time to fight back.
[01:18:48.160 --> 01:18:57.800] Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call 512-430-4140 and get the information you need to stop the
[01:18:57.800 --> 01:19:04.800] money changers in their tracks.
[01:19:28.800 --> 01:19:30.800] Alright folks, we are back.
[01:19:30.800 --> 01:19:32.800] We're taking your calls.
[01:19:32.800 --> 01:19:36.800] 512-646-1984.
[01:19:36.800 --> 01:19:38.800] We're going next to John in Texas.
[01:19:38.800 --> 01:19:40.800] Apparently John wants to rail on the TSA.
[01:19:40.800 --> 01:19:42.800] What do you got for us, John?
[01:19:42.800 --> 01:19:49.800] Yeah, basically I'm just going because I heard the comment about the IQ of a KFC worker
[01:19:49.800 --> 01:19:55.800] and I thought it was very funny because there's a movie called Idiocracy where the security
[01:19:55.800 --> 01:20:03.800] or just a bunch of fat out of shape people that have the IQ of a peanut and the way security
[01:20:03.800 --> 01:20:07.800] and everything is going, it reminds me of the movie Idiocracy.
[01:20:07.800 --> 01:20:14.800] It's by I think, I'm not sure Mike Judge, I don't know, but it's a movie called Idiocracy
[01:20:14.800 --> 01:20:16.800] about 155 years from now.
[01:20:16.800 --> 01:20:19.800] Yeah, I've seen it and I know which one you're talking about.
[01:20:19.800 --> 01:20:22.800] But yeah, I agree with you.
[01:20:22.800 --> 01:20:25.800] The similarities are astounding, are they not?
[01:20:25.800 --> 01:20:29.800] Yeah, and what's worse is it's happening right in front of us.
[01:20:29.800 --> 01:20:35.800] With the vaccines, with all sorts of weird stuff and just with the educational system,
[01:20:35.800 --> 01:20:37.800] I mean it's unbelievable.
[01:20:37.800 --> 01:20:46.800] As far as the TSA goes, I've seen them on videos harass children and the worst part
[01:20:46.800 --> 01:20:54.800] about that is that I've seen grown adults who portray themselves as men visually in person
[01:20:54.800 --> 01:20:59.800] see this on the video and all they do is say, man, that's messed up.
[01:20:59.800 --> 01:21:02.800] It's like, why don't you say something?
[01:21:02.800 --> 01:21:10.800] If I ever saw this in person, I would have to say something to just be instinctual.
[01:21:10.800 --> 01:21:13.800] I would just have to say something like, hey, what are you guys doing over there?
[01:21:13.800 --> 01:21:16.800] You like molesting children and I'd probably get arrested,
[01:21:16.800 --> 01:21:21.800] but at least everybody would know that and put them on notice.
[01:21:21.800 --> 01:21:25.800] The thing is I don't know why people put up with this junk.
[01:21:25.800 --> 01:21:26.800] I mean it's unbelievable.
[01:21:26.800 --> 01:21:30.800] I haven't even flown since all this TSA stuff came out.
[01:21:30.800 --> 01:21:36.800] I just think that people in general, either they love it or they think that,
[01:21:36.800 --> 01:21:41.800] hey, it's for our own safety and now that you're talking about this DNA thing
[01:21:41.800 --> 01:21:45.800] that they're doing, that's completely out of line.
[01:21:45.800 --> 01:21:48.800] I mean I don't know about anybody else,
[01:21:48.800 --> 01:21:54.800] but I'm not scared of terrorist bogeymen that live halfway across the world in caves
[01:21:54.800 --> 01:21:59.800] and have beards and all this other bogeyman nonsense.
[01:21:59.800 --> 01:22:02.800] They should make a cartoon for kids called The Terrorist Bogeyman
[01:22:02.800 --> 01:22:07.800] and then have like a bogeyman in the closet with a turban on or something.
[01:22:07.800 --> 01:22:11.800] Well, what they should do is he'd have a turban, when he lists a turban,
[01:22:11.800 --> 01:22:13.800] it's got a TSA cap under it.
[01:22:13.800 --> 01:22:15.800] Yeah, and a badge.
[01:22:15.800 --> 01:22:17.800] Don't forget the badge.
[01:22:17.800 --> 01:22:19.800] A fake badge, yeah.
[01:22:19.800 --> 01:22:24.800] Yeah, and another thing just real quick is that what I'm more concerned about
[01:22:24.800 --> 01:22:28.800] is all the terrorism that's going on south of the border
[01:22:28.800 --> 01:22:31.800] that's creeping up on the borders.
[01:22:31.800 --> 01:22:33.800] Why are they not concerned about this?
[01:22:33.800 --> 01:22:35.800] I mean it's all just a money racket.
[01:22:35.800 --> 01:22:37.800] Because they're helping with that, see.
[01:22:37.800 --> 01:22:41.800] Yeah, it's just a money racket is all it is, you know.
[01:22:41.800 --> 01:22:46.800] Well, I agree, and this goes back to what Debra and then we're talking about on the air,
[01:22:46.800 --> 01:22:49.800] or I'm sorry, Steve and his wife Carolyn, they were talking about
[01:22:49.800 --> 01:22:52.800] if you're not bucking the system, you're an unfit parent.
[01:22:52.800 --> 01:22:55.800] Well, let me tell you folks, if you're standing at the airport
[01:22:55.800 --> 01:23:00.800] watching TSA sexually molest your child, you're an unfit parent.
[01:23:00.800 --> 01:23:02.800] Correct, correct.
[01:23:02.800 --> 01:23:06.800] You pull that crap in front of me and intimidation's the last thing
[01:23:06.800 --> 01:23:08.800] you're going to have to worry about from me.
[01:23:08.800 --> 01:23:12.800] Intimidation will be me standing above you looking down going,
[01:23:12.800 --> 01:23:14.800] take that and don't ever do it again.
[01:23:14.800 --> 01:23:17.800] Now take me to jail.
[01:23:17.800 --> 01:23:21.800] Yeah, and the gentleman that videotaped this,
[01:23:21.800 --> 01:23:23.800] he videotaped his own son getting groped.
[01:23:23.800 --> 01:23:27.800] I mean, I understand where he was coming from with the TSA and being angry,
[01:23:27.800 --> 01:23:31.800] but what kind of a father are you if you stand there and let your son get groped?
[01:23:31.800 --> 01:23:35.800] I don't care if they were a police officer and said,
[01:23:35.800 --> 01:23:38.800] you're going to go to prison if you try to stop me.
[01:23:38.800 --> 01:23:41.800] If I had a child and he was getting groped by the police officer,
[01:23:41.800 --> 01:23:43.800] the police officer would know about it, period.
[01:23:43.800 --> 01:23:45.800] And I don't care.
[01:23:45.800 --> 01:23:47.800] I mean, it's just not right on any level.
[01:23:47.800 --> 01:23:50.800] And the TSA, they're getting way too much authority.
[01:23:50.800 --> 01:23:52.800] It's so ridiculous.
[01:23:52.800 --> 01:23:58.800] They need to kick him out of the airport, get him in line somewhere
[01:23:58.800 --> 01:24:03.800] in one of these cheap restaurants or something, and employ them in that manner.
[01:24:03.800 --> 01:24:06.800] I mean, the thing is, these people are just out of line.
[01:24:06.800 --> 01:24:09.800] And I don't know what extent people are going to take it,
[01:24:09.800 --> 01:24:14.800] if people are going to accept the DNA because they're scared of terrorist bogeymen.
[01:24:14.800 --> 01:24:17.800] What's so scary about a terrorist?
[01:24:17.800 --> 01:24:18.800] I just don't get it.
[01:24:18.800 --> 01:24:24.800] I mean, OK, let's say somebody gets on the plane with some sort of device or something.
[01:24:24.800 --> 01:24:28.800] You know, I mean, the chances of that happening,
[01:24:28.800 --> 01:24:34.800] there's more of a chance of some idiot rear-ending you in traffic than that happening.
[01:24:34.800 --> 01:24:36.800] Actually, there's been statistics on this.
[01:24:36.800 --> 01:24:40.800] The chances of you suffering at the hands of a terrorist attack
[01:24:40.800 --> 01:24:46.800] are far less than the chances of you getting struck by lightning.
[01:24:46.800 --> 01:24:51.800] Now, that was, of course, until the government decided to protect us.
[01:24:51.800 --> 01:24:52.800] There you go.
[01:24:52.800 --> 01:24:58.800] I mean, I need all the protection because I'm so scared and I don't have my rights anymore.
[01:24:58.800 --> 01:25:03.800] And the thing is, I can't even carry a gun anymore because that's for weird people.
[01:25:03.800 --> 01:25:07.800] Carrying a concealed gun is for weird people that are psychopaths.
[01:25:07.800 --> 01:25:10.800] Well, John, just as a note of encouragement,
[01:25:10.800 --> 01:25:15.800] I think the tide is turning where a lot more people,
[01:25:15.800 --> 01:25:18.800] the majority is not putting up with this anymore.
[01:25:18.800 --> 01:25:24.800] Case in point, a friend of mine, Chris, his name is Chris Campanella,
[01:25:24.800 --> 01:25:26.800] he was in an airport.
[01:25:26.800 --> 01:25:28.800] This was about a month or so ago.
[01:25:28.800 --> 01:25:33.800] And there was mainstream media, the local TV news station was there
[01:25:33.800 --> 01:25:37.800] interviewing people in the airport about how they feel about TSA
[01:25:37.800 --> 01:25:39.800] and the naked body scanners and the groping and everything.
[01:25:39.800 --> 01:25:43.800] And he watched them and he actually kind of followed at a distance
[01:25:43.800 --> 01:25:46.800] while they interviewed about 25 different people.
[01:25:46.800 --> 01:25:50.800] And every single one of them said, I'm not going through the body scanner
[01:25:50.800 --> 01:25:52.800] and I'm not going to let him touch me or my children either.
[01:25:52.800 --> 01:25:57.800] And if I don't get on the plane, I guess I'm just going to miss my flight.
[01:25:57.800 --> 01:26:02.800] Every single person said that except for one ditzy bimbo blonde who said,
[01:26:02.800 --> 01:26:06.800] well, I guess if he makes us feel safe, if they're safer, I guess it's okay.
[01:26:06.800 --> 01:26:11.800] Well, guess which interview got put on the mainstream media that night.
[01:26:11.800 --> 01:26:12.800] The blonde.
[01:26:12.800 --> 01:26:13.800] Of course.
[01:26:13.800 --> 01:26:16.800] So I think that, you know, the tide has definitely turned.
[01:26:16.800 --> 01:26:20.800] The majority of the people in this country are not putting up with this anymore.
[01:26:20.800 --> 01:26:26.800] In fact, there was a poll on MSNBC about this issue where you get three choices.
[01:26:26.800 --> 01:26:28.800] It was a multiple choice question.
[01:26:28.800 --> 01:26:30.800] Are you not going to fly anymore?
[01:26:30.800 --> 01:26:34.800] Will you take the groping or would you take the body scanner?
[01:26:34.800 --> 01:26:39.800] And it was something like 75, it was like between 75 and 80 percent of the people
[01:26:39.800 --> 01:26:43.800] that answered the MSNBC poll said, we're just not going to fly.
[01:26:43.800 --> 01:26:49.800] And there was like what was left, there was like 25, 20 to 25 percent left.
[01:26:49.800 --> 01:26:54.800] I think it was like 10, 15 percent said that they would take the body scanner
[01:26:54.800 --> 01:26:58.800] and then like something 5 to 10 percent said that they would take the pat down.
[01:26:58.800 --> 01:27:01.800] And one guy who said that he would take the pat down, he said,
[01:27:01.800 --> 01:27:03.800] it was a really funny comedy.
[01:27:03.800 --> 01:27:07.800] He said something like, tell you what,
[01:27:07.800 --> 01:27:11.800] you do what you think you need to do and then we're going to fight.
[01:27:11.800 --> 01:27:14.800] And if you do something, oh, that was what he said, he says,
[01:27:14.800 --> 01:27:18.800] if you do something wrong to me, I'm going to do something wrong to you.
[01:27:18.800 --> 01:27:20.800] So take your best shot, buddy.
[01:27:20.800 --> 01:27:23.800] Okay, so some people are like, they're ready to get it on.
[01:27:23.800 --> 01:27:26.800] They're ready to start throwing punches.
[01:27:26.800 --> 01:27:28.800] That's the way it should be.
[01:27:28.800 --> 01:27:29.800] That's human instinct.
[01:27:29.800 --> 01:27:33.800] I mean, I think a lot of people, you know, the society in general has been so neutered
[01:27:33.800 --> 01:27:37.800] by authority and perceived authority and uniforms and badges
[01:27:37.800 --> 01:27:42.800] and all this other nonsense that, you know, human reaction,
[01:27:42.800 --> 01:27:45.800] just normal human reaction has been suppressed.
[01:27:45.800 --> 01:27:48.800] And these police officers, everybody knows they're just thugs,
[01:27:48.800 --> 01:27:52.800] mafioso collection thugs for the state and for the city.
[01:27:52.800 --> 01:27:54.800] I mean, they have no purpose.
[01:27:54.800 --> 01:27:58.800] They don't help anybody or save anybody from a crime.
[01:27:58.800 --> 01:28:01.800] They just show up after the crime has been committed anyway.
[01:28:01.800 --> 01:28:03.800] Their main job is to collect revenue.
[01:28:03.800 --> 01:28:13.800] And as far as the TSA goes, I've heard that the – it was somewhere where they cannot even detect guns.
[01:28:13.800 --> 01:28:17.800] They fail to detect weapons in people's bags.
[01:28:17.800 --> 01:28:19.800] I mean, just like the box cutter incident.
[01:28:19.800 --> 01:28:23.800] And yet they're over here groping people and –
[01:28:23.800 --> 01:28:24.800] Oh, it's ridiculous.
[01:28:24.800 --> 01:28:27.800] Yeah, there was a – that was an article on Infowars.
[01:28:27.800 --> 01:28:31.800] I think it was yesterday or the day before where there was an undercover –
[01:28:31.800 --> 01:28:37.800] a high level to undercover TSA agent that actually went through the naked body scanner
[01:28:37.800 --> 01:28:44.800] and was groped down five times in one weekend and they didn't detect the presence of a firearm.
[01:28:44.800 --> 01:28:46.800] I mean, it's total stupidness.
[01:28:46.800 --> 01:28:49.800] But, John, I think that there is an encouragement here.
[01:28:49.800 --> 01:28:52.800] People are getting to the point where they're not putting up with it.
[01:28:52.800 --> 01:28:58.800] I mean, on MSNBC poll when 75 to 80 percent of the people poll – participated in the poll said,
[01:28:58.800 --> 01:29:00.800] we're just not going to fly anymore.
[01:29:00.800 --> 01:29:01.800] We're not putting up with it.
[01:29:01.800 --> 01:29:02.800] You're not going to touch my child.
[01:29:02.800 --> 01:29:08.800] And the guy who said, yeah, I'll fly and I'll go through – I'm not going through the body scanner.
[01:29:08.800 --> 01:29:09.800] I'll go through the pad down.
[01:29:09.800 --> 01:29:13.800] But he was like, whatever you do that's wrong to me, I'm going to do back to you.
[01:29:13.800 --> 01:29:17.800] So start searching, pal, and let's see what happens.
[01:29:17.800 --> 01:29:22.800] John, I'm thinking about going to the airport and if I get searched, you know,
[01:29:22.800 --> 01:29:24.800] because I need to go on business and whatnot.
[01:29:24.800 --> 01:29:34.800] But, you know, if I get searched, just urinating in my pants, you know, and let them, you know.
[01:29:34.800 --> 01:29:38.800] Yeah, Bubba, grope this.
[01:29:38.800 --> 01:29:40.800] Okay, John, that's pretty funny.
[01:29:40.800 --> 01:29:42.800] You got anything else for us?
[01:29:42.800 --> 01:29:43.800] That's it.
[01:29:43.800 --> 01:29:47.800] This is ridiculous and I'm glad you guys brought up the whole situation with TSA because, I mean,
[01:29:47.800 --> 01:29:48.800] people need to hear about this.
[01:29:48.800 --> 01:29:49.800] All right.
[01:29:49.800 --> 01:29:50.800] Well, John, we've got to go to break.
[01:29:50.800 --> 01:29:53.800] We'll keep everyone posted on when that committee hearing is on that bill
[01:29:53.800 --> 01:29:55.800] in the legislature introduced by Simpson.
[01:29:55.800 --> 01:29:59.800] We'll be right back.
[01:29:59.800 --> 01:30:02.800] Are you tired of depending on the supermarket for your family's food?
[01:30:02.800 --> 01:30:05.800] Would you like to grow fresh produce in the convenience of your own backyard?
[01:30:05.800 --> 01:30:07.800] As well as offering professional lawn care services,
[01:30:07.800 --> 01:30:11.800] Austin Clean and Clear will customize an independence garden for your family's needs and budget.
[01:30:11.800 --> 01:30:17.800] Call 512-294-8429 today and let us bring you closer to a healthier, more independent lifestyle.
[01:30:17.800 --> 01:30:22.800] That's 512-294-8429 or find us at austincleanandclear.com.
[01:30:22.800 --> 01:30:25.800] Our gardens are the perfect combination of beauty and practicality.
[01:30:25.800 --> 01:30:29.800] Call 512-294-8429 today.
[01:30:29.800 --> 01:30:33.800] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:30:33.800 --> 01:30:37.800] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:30:37.800 --> 01:30:38.800] Our liberty depends on it.
[01:30:38.800 --> 01:30:44.800] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:30:44.800 --> 01:30:48.800] Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches
[01:30:48.800 --> 01:30:52.800] and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:52.800 --> 01:30:53.800] That's creepy.
[01:30:53.800 --> 01:30:55.800] But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:55.800 --> 01:30:58.800] Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:58.800 --> 01:31:03.800] Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies,
[01:31:03.800 --> 01:31:05.800] and they're third-party certified.
[01:31:05.800 --> 01:31:09.800] If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:31:09.800 --> 01:31:12.800] Great search results and total privacy.
[01:31:12.800 --> 01:31:15.800] Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:15.800 --> 01:31:21.800] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[01:31:21.800 --> 01:31:27.800] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure.
[01:31:27.800 --> 01:31:29.800] Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you?
[01:31:29.800 --> 01:31:30.800] Get it?
[01:31:30.800 --> 01:31:34.800] Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security.
[01:31:34.800 --> 01:31:39.800] Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[01:31:39.800 --> 01:31:43.800] When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause,
[01:31:43.800 --> 01:31:46.800] I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:31:46.800 --> 01:31:49.800] Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[01:31:49.800 --> 01:31:53.800] and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:31:53.800 --> 01:31:54.800] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:54.800 --> 01:32:04.800] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32:24.800 --> 01:32:36.800] Okay, folks, we're back.
[01:32:36.800 --> 01:32:41.800] We're an hour and a half into our four-hour info marathon, our Friday night four-hour info marathon.
[01:32:41.800 --> 01:32:43.800] The call board is just about cleared out.
[01:32:43.800 --> 01:32:45.800] We only have one other caller on the board.
[01:32:45.800 --> 01:32:51.800] So, folks, if you'd like to call in, now is the time, 512-646-1984.
[01:32:51.800 --> 01:32:54.800] We've got Walt from New York.
[01:32:54.800 --> 01:32:55.800] Walt, thank you for calling in.
[01:32:55.800 --> 01:32:57.800] What is on your mind tonight?
[01:32:57.800 --> 01:32:58.800] Yes.
[01:32:58.800 --> 01:32:59.800] Hello, everybody.
[01:32:59.800 --> 01:33:00.800] Hello, rural law teachers.
[01:33:00.800 --> 01:33:01.800] Hello.
[01:33:01.800 --> 01:33:04.800] Do you want me to make a comment about the security issue?
[01:33:04.800 --> 01:33:05.800] Sure.
[01:33:05.800 --> 01:33:06.800] Tell us what's on your mind.
[01:33:06.800 --> 01:33:07.800] All right.
[01:33:07.800 --> 01:33:09.800] The security issue, I don't know that much about it,
[01:33:09.800 --> 01:33:13.800] but the security issue is related to the terrorism issue.
[01:33:13.800 --> 01:33:19.800] And the terrorism issue is related to the way we act in the world, our country.
[01:33:19.800 --> 01:33:25.800] And we are oppressing and occupying other countries for oil and natural resources.
[01:33:25.800 --> 01:33:27.800] And those people don't like that.
[01:33:27.800 --> 01:33:30.800] And there's got to be something we can do to change that.
[01:33:30.800 --> 01:33:35.800] And I don't know exactly how to proceed, but I think that until that problem is addressed,
[01:33:35.800 --> 01:33:36.800] you can do all the security you want.
[01:33:36.800 --> 01:33:38.800] It's not going to stop the problem.
[01:33:38.800 --> 01:33:40.800] And that's all I wanted to say about that.
[01:33:40.800 --> 01:33:42.800] Well, Walt, you have a very good point.
[01:33:42.800 --> 01:33:46.800] And that's what Ron Paul said during his last presidential campaign,
[01:33:46.800 --> 01:33:50.800] that the reason that they're angry at us is because we're over there.
[01:33:50.800 --> 01:33:54.800] And that's even been documented in CIA reports.
[01:33:54.800 --> 01:33:57.800] I mean, even the government itself admits that.
[01:33:57.800 --> 01:34:03.800] But as far as the terrorism issue, I don't really see any real terrorism in this country.
[01:34:03.800 --> 01:34:08.800] I mean, it's pretty much been proven for the last 25 years plus
[01:34:08.800 --> 01:34:15.800] that every single instance of so-called Islamic terrorism has actually been staged by our own government.
[01:34:15.800 --> 01:34:17.800] I mean, including 9-11.
[01:34:17.800 --> 01:34:23.800] I mean, every single instance of so-called terrorism, period, that has occurred in this country
[01:34:23.800 --> 01:34:29.800] and in many other countries for the last however many years has been staged by their own governments.
[01:34:29.800 --> 01:34:30.800] I mean, this is typical.
[01:34:30.800 --> 01:34:31.800] This is typical.
[01:34:31.800 --> 01:34:36.800] This goes all the way back to before the Reichstag fire with Hitler.
[01:34:36.800 --> 01:34:39.800] This goes back to Guy Fawkes' day, okay?
[01:34:39.800 --> 01:34:41.800] Guy Fawkes' day, way back in the day.
[01:34:41.800 --> 01:34:45.800] They set him up, oh, this guy, he's going to blow up the parliament.
[01:34:45.800 --> 01:34:49.800] It was all to give more power to, you know, whoever was the chancellor at the time.
[01:34:49.800 --> 01:34:55.800] I mean, this is what the Star Wars movie series was all about.
[01:34:55.800 --> 01:34:57.800] Stage false flag terrorism, people.
[01:34:57.800 --> 01:34:59.800] I mean, this is as old as the hills.
[01:34:59.800 --> 01:35:05.800] Any time a government sees that the people are getting onto their scam
[01:35:05.800 --> 01:35:09.800] and getting onto their schemes and they're getting unhappy with what's going on,
[01:35:09.800 --> 01:35:11.800] the government stages a false flag terrorist attack.
[01:35:11.800 --> 01:35:16.800] Every single time we're hit to the scheme, so it's just not going to work anymore,
[01:35:16.800 --> 01:35:17.800] so they may as well just give it up.
[01:35:17.800 --> 01:35:20.800] But yeah, we should, we definitely need to change foreign policy.
[01:35:20.800 --> 01:35:22.800] Good point, Walt, okay?
[01:35:22.800 --> 01:35:23.800] Can I ask you two short questions?
[01:35:23.800 --> 01:35:24.800] Go ahead.
[01:35:24.800 --> 01:35:25.800] What else you got for us?
[01:35:25.800 --> 01:35:26.800] Okay.
[01:35:26.800 --> 01:35:28.800] One of them's about a personal violation,
[01:35:28.800 --> 01:35:35.800] and the other one's about a family member of mine is running for mayor in Rochester, New York.
[01:35:35.800 --> 01:35:38.800] And he would, the Republican Party was going to have him on the ticket,
[01:35:38.800 --> 01:35:41.800] and at the last minute they decided not to have him run.
[01:35:41.800 --> 01:35:43.800] So they're running nobody.
[01:35:43.800 --> 01:35:47.800] So he didn't have enough time to get the 1,500 signatures to get on the ballot,
[01:35:47.800 --> 01:35:48.800] so he's a write-in.
[01:35:48.800 --> 01:35:53.800] And when he goes to the debates, of course, these are all sponsored by the media,
[01:35:53.800 --> 01:35:58.800] the candidates want this person to go up on stage to debate.
[01:35:58.800 --> 01:36:02.800] They welcome him, but the people sponsoring it refuse to let him do so.
[01:36:02.800 --> 01:36:04.800] He does have some media coverage.
[01:36:04.800 --> 01:36:08.800] But my first question to you is I just have two questions.
[01:36:08.800 --> 01:36:12.800] Is there anything he can do to require these people that are having these debates
[01:36:12.800 --> 01:36:17.800] to get this person up on stage so he can present his views?
[01:36:17.800 --> 01:36:21.800] Yeah, about the only thing he can do is pay for the debate, pay to house the debate.
[01:36:21.800 --> 01:36:31.800] You could maybe sue him, but this was a big problem with Ron Paul during the 08 presidential campaign.
[01:36:31.800 --> 01:36:34.800] They didn't want to let Ron Paul into the debates,
[01:36:34.800 --> 01:36:38.800] and it was a big fight to get him into the debates at all,
[01:36:38.800 --> 01:36:42.800] because the problem is that the news media were hosting the debates,
[01:36:42.800 --> 01:36:46.800] so they get to decide who's in the debate, and it's pretty unfair.
[01:36:46.800 --> 01:36:50.800] But yeah, you could sue him.
[01:36:50.800 --> 01:36:52.800] I don't know what else could be done, really.
[01:36:52.800 --> 01:36:55.800] Otherwise, you just have to host your own debates.
[01:36:55.800 --> 01:36:59.800] All right, the last question is this.
[01:36:59.800 --> 01:37:03.800] If a person goes to a doctor, and they're in the waiting room,
[01:37:03.800 --> 01:37:07.800] and the doctor comes and never met the patient, comes and gets the patient,
[01:37:07.800 --> 01:37:13.800] walks him to his office, and they have this like a sheet that you hand over to the doctor,
[01:37:13.800 --> 01:37:20.800] and he forcefully, against the patient's will, yanks it out of his hand or tries to, doesn't succeed,
[01:37:20.800 --> 01:37:26.800] but on another date does it and uses more force and succeeds,
[01:37:26.800 --> 01:37:31.800] what kind of personal violation would that be if it's against the patient's will?
[01:37:31.800 --> 01:37:34.800] Because what it was supposed to be was the patient, when they got to the office,
[01:37:34.800 --> 01:37:36.800] would hand over the document to the doctor,
[01:37:36.800 --> 01:37:40.800] but this doctor was trying to be funny with the patient.
[01:37:40.800 --> 01:37:49.800] So do you see any violation here when a person's personal rights not to be forced against like that?
[01:37:49.800 --> 01:37:52.800] Randy just said that's assault.
[01:37:52.800 --> 01:37:59.800] Technically that's assault, but were these papers that would be given to the doctor anyway?
[01:37:59.800 --> 01:38:01.800] Well, they're like an encounter sheet.
[01:38:01.800 --> 01:38:07.800] They have to sign them and everything, and then you turn them back into the secretary after the meeting's over.
[01:38:07.800 --> 01:38:09.800] We could file assault against the doctor.
[01:38:09.800 --> 01:38:14.800] I doubt that'll go anywhere, but file a complaint with the Board of Medicines.
[01:38:14.800 --> 01:38:16.800] Oh, yeah, file a complaint with the state.
[01:38:16.800 --> 01:38:18.800] Would it be another term besides being called assault?
[01:38:18.800 --> 01:38:20.800] No, there's no other way to label it.
[01:38:20.800 --> 01:38:28.800] Anytime you do something forcefully within someone else's personal space,
[01:38:28.800 --> 01:38:31.800] which is generally defined as within arm's length, about three feet,
[01:38:31.800 --> 01:38:38.800] anytime you physically, either with your own body or with some other object,
[01:38:38.800 --> 01:38:44.800] enter someone else's personal space against their will and do something forcefully within their personal space,
[01:38:44.800 --> 01:38:48.800] which is like a three-foot radius, that is assault.
[01:38:48.800 --> 01:38:54.800] It's in a way that an ordinary person of reasonable prudence would find offensive.
[01:38:54.800 --> 01:38:57.800] Okay. Now, can I just finish with this?
[01:38:57.800 --> 01:39:01.800] Can I tell you folks a 30-second joke that'll light up the night a little bit?
[01:39:01.800 --> 01:39:03.800] As long as it's clean, this is a family show.
[01:39:03.800 --> 01:39:04.800] Is it a cop-driver joke?
[01:39:04.800 --> 01:39:08.800] It's a very good joke. I think you're going to laugh real hard.
[01:39:08.800 --> 01:39:11.800] All right, what happened was the devil one day went into the church,
[01:39:11.800 --> 01:39:15.800] the back of the church when everybody was talking and having coffee,
[01:39:15.800 --> 01:39:18.800] and he went up to this guy and he says, I'm the devil.
[01:39:18.800 --> 01:39:20.800] And the guy says, so what?
[01:39:20.800 --> 01:39:23.800] And the devil said back to the guy, he says, aren't you afraid of me?
[01:39:23.800 --> 01:39:29.800] And the guy said back to him, no, because I've been married to your sister for 30 years.
[01:39:29.800 --> 01:39:30.800] Okay.
[01:39:30.800 --> 01:39:34.800] I hope you're not offended by that. Bye.
[01:39:34.800 --> 01:39:36.800] Have a good night and have a nice weekend.
[01:39:36.800 --> 01:39:37.800] All right. Thanks, Walt.
[01:39:37.800 --> 01:39:38.800] Bye-bye.
[01:39:38.800 --> 01:39:44.800] Okay. We are going now to Brian in Minnesota.
[01:39:44.800 --> 01:39:47.800] Brian, thanks for calling in. What's on your mind tonight?
[01:39:47.800 --> 01:39:48.800] How are you all doing?
[01:39:48.800 --> 01:39:51.800] Okay.
[01:39:51.800 --> 01:39:56.800] So I was listening to a different episode a couple of nights ago,
[01:39:56.800 --> 01:40:00.800] and Randy was talking about how a finding,
[01:40:00.800 --> 01:40:05.800] if they refuse to produce a finding of the facts and conclusions of law,
[01:40:05.800 --> 01:40:10.800] that that would be an actionable position more or less.
[01:40:10.800 --> 01:40:13.800] That's a violation of a ministerial duty.
[01:40:13.800 --> 01:40:15.800] It is a ministerial duty.
[01:40:15.800 --> 01:40:16.800] Yes.
[01:40:16.800 --> 01:40:20.800] And you have a right to that, but you need it to perfect your appeal.
[01:40:20.800 --> 01:40:23.800] Without it, you have no way of crafting an appeal.
[01:40:23.800 --> 01:40:27.800] So you just have to guess on what the judge, how the judge ruled.
[01:40:27.800 --> 01:40:29.800] Now, normally they won't give that to you,
[01:40:29.800 --> 01:40:34.800] and attorneys will never go after the judge for failing to perform his duty.
[01:40:34.800 --> 01:40:37.800] But we're not attorneys.
[01:40:37.800 --> 01:40:43.800] Right.
[01:40:43.800 --> 01:40:50.800] So are you in a case where that would be a situation you're likely to get to?
[01:40:50.800 --> 01:40:52.800] Well, I'm in my definitely.
[01:40:52.800 --> 01:40:55.800] I went to my second motions hearing the other day.
[01:40:55.800 --> 01:40:57.800] This is for a traffic case.
[01:40:57.800 --> 01:41:02.800] And this is kind of one of those situations where Eddie would say
[01:41:02.800 --> 01:41:05.800] they just denied my motions out of hand.
[01:41:05.800 --> 01:41:08.800] I could tell they were, it was kind of standoffish,
[01:41:08.800 --> 01:41:10.800] because I could tell they didn't like my motions
[01:41:10.800 --> 01:41:13.800] and they were trying to dodge and weave around it.
[01:41:13.800 --> 01:41:18.800] Because I put in, one was like a demand to be faced by my accuser,
[01:41:18.800 --> 01:41:22.800] just because I think the complaint was forged.
[01:41:22.800 --> 01:41:24.800] So I was going to talk about that.
[01:41:24.800 --> 01:41:29.800] And then in my request, I put in a request for discovery.
[01:41:29.800 --> 01:41:32.800] I don't think they liked the fact that I was asking for all their bank account
[01:41:32.800 --> 01:41:39.800] information related to the corporate numbers of the corporation.
[01:41:39.800 --> 01:41:42.800] And then I asked for the oath of office.
[01:41:42.800 --> 01:41:43.800] And then what was the other one?
[01:41:43.800 --> 01:41:44.800] One more.
[01:41:44.800 --> 01:41:47.800] Oh, demand for the court reporter to record all proceedings.
[01:41:47.800 --> 01:41:57.800] And the prosecutor came out with the angle that these were pre,
[01:41:57.800 --> 01:42:01.800] that I'm filing them too soon, and these were like assuming evidence more or less.
[01:42:01.800 --> 01:42:06.800] But I would just ask, I mean, I was like requesting for discovery and stuff.
[01:42:06.800 --> 01:42:11.800] And the judge, the judge just, he denied them, and I asked, I said...
[01:42:11.800 --> 01:42:14.800] He denied you and your right to be faced by your accuser?
[01:42:14.800 --> 01:42:16.800] Yeah, right.
[01:42:16.800 --> 01:42:20.800] That's constitutional.
[01:42:20.800 --> 01:42:21.800] Definitely.
[01:42:21.800 --> 01:42:24.800] So you need to move to disqualify the judge,
[01:42:24.800 --> 01:42:31.800] claiming that the judge has perpetrated a constitutional violation against you,
[01:42:31.800 --> 01:42:35.800] which gives you a civil claim against the judge
[01:42:35.800 --> 01:42:42.800] and thereby gives the judge a personal interest in the outcome of the case.
[01:42:42.800 --> 01:42:45.800] That will give you an apoplexy.
[01:42:45.800 --> 01:42:49.800] Well, and one of the other problems I'm dealing with is every time I go there,
[01:42:49.800 --> 01:42:55.800] there's a different prosecutor and a different judge.
[01:42:55.800 --> 01:42:57.800] That is a problem we often have.
[01:42:57.800 --> 01:43:01.800] The first thing you ask the judge, have you read all the pleading
[01:43:01.800 --> 01:43:06.800] and familiarized yourself with all the pleadings and issues in this case?
[01:43:06.800 --> 01:43:10.800] If he says no, demand that he stand down from the bench.
[01:43:10.800 --> 01:43:14.800] You have a right to a competent and fair jurist in the first instance.
[01:43:14.800 --> 01:43:19.800] If you haven't read my pleadings, you have no business sitting in this court.
[01:43:19.800 --> 01:43:23.800] Well, I was trying to get prepared to do that,
[01:43:23.800 --> 01:43:26.800] but I couldn't quite hold him on that well enough,
[01:43:26.800 --> 01:43:29.800] which kind of goes to my other...
[01:43:29.800 --> 01:43:36.800] I wasn't even ready before the prosecutor started jumping at me, more or less.
[01:43:36.800 --> 01:43:37.800] Hold on.
[01:43:37.800 --> 01:43:38.800] Jumping at you.
[01:43:38.800 --> 01:43:40.800] Okay, we're about to go to break.
[01:43:40.800 --> 01:43:44.800] When we come back, I'd like to hear about jumping at you.
[01:43:44.800 --> 01:43:45.800] Yeah, right up.
[01:43:45.800 --> 01:43:48.800] Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig,
[01:43:48.800 --> 01:43:50.800] Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:50.800 --> 01:43:54.800] My call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:43:54.800 --> 01:43:56.800] We will be right back.
[01:43:56.800 --> 01:44:02.800] More energy.
[01:44:02.800 --> 01:44:04.800] Stronger immune power.
[01:44:04.800 --> 01:44:07.800] Improved sense of well-being.
[01:44:07.800 --> 01:44:11.800] How many supplements have you heard boast of these benefits?
[01:44:11.800 --> 01:44:14.800] The team behind Shentrition believes that supplements should
[01:44:14.800 --> 01:44:20.800] over-deliver on their promises, and Shentrition does just that.
[01:44:20.800 --> 01:44:24.800] Shentrition utilizes the ancient healing wisdom of Chinese medicine.
[01:44:24.800 --> 01:44:27.800] In conjunction with the science of modern nutrition,
[01:44:27.800 --> 01:44:30.800] adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component,
[01:44:30.800 --> 01:44:36.800] and organic hemp protein in greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base.
[01:44:36.800 --> 01:44:40.800] Plus, Shentrition tastes great in just water.
[01:44:40.800 --> 01:44:46.800] This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product, and it's all natural.
[01:44:46.800 --> 01:44:54.800] Visit Shentrition.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436.
[01:44:54.800 --> 01:44:59.800] After you use Shentrition, you'll believe in supplements again.
[01:44:59.800 --> 01:45:02.800] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:02.800 --> 01:45:06.800] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:06.800 --> 01:45:11.800] the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how
[01:45:11.800 --> 01:45:14.800] in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.800 --> 01:45:18.800] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.800 --> 01:45:21.800] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:21.800 --> 01:45:26.800] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too.
[01:45:26.800 --> 01:45:29.800] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:29.800 --> 01:45:33.800] with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.800 --> 01:45:37.800] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:37.800 --> 01:45:42.800] about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.800 --> 01:45:46.800] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:46.800 --> 01:45:51.800] forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.800 --> 01:45:55.800] Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:55.800 --> 01:46:00.800] or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:00.800 --> 01:46:25.800] Thank you.
[01:46:30.800 --> 01:46:57.800] Okay, folks, we are back.
[01:46:57.800 --> 01:47:00.800] We're talking to Brian in Minnesota.
[01:47:00.800 --> 01:47:04.800] All right, Brian, we are trying to get the lowdown on the prosecutor
[01:47:04.800 --> 01:47:05.800] jumping at you or something.
[01:47:05.800 --> 01:47:08.800] What's all this?
[01:47:08.800 --> 01:47:13.800] Well, so when we walked in for the motion hearing, of course, you know,
[01:47:13.800 --> 01:47:16.800] this was, they do, it seems like, well, this is the second time, you know,
[01:47:16.800 --> 01:47:18.800] there's nobody else there.
[01:47:18.800 --> 01:47:20.800] I have a court watcher with me, at least.
[01:47:20.800 --> 01:47:25.800] But it was kind of informal like how we just walked up to the podium
[01:47:25.800 --> 01:47:28.800] and immediately the prosecutor just starts, you know,
[01:47:28.800 --> 01:47:31.800] I don't know if there's anything procedurally there
[01:47:31.800 --> 01:47:33.800] where the judges should address everyone first.
[01:47:33.800 --> 01:47:36.800] It just seemed kind of, she was very aggressive,
[01:47:36.800 --> 01:47:38.800] which I understand as the prosecutor.
[01:47:38.800 --> 01:47:41.800] Wait, did she speak to you?
[01:47:41.800 --> 01:47:43.800] No.
[01:47:43.800 --> 01:47:48.800] But I walked up there and before I even kind of like set down all my folders
[01:47:48.800 --> 01:47:52.800] and got my papers to look at, she was, you know, addressing,
[01:47:52.800 --> 01:47:59.800] she had addressed the motions and kind of had her attack ready for me.
[01:47:59.800 --> 01:48:00.800] Oh, okay.
[01:48:00.800 --> 01:48:02.800] When you said she was jumping at you,
[01:48:02.800 --> 01:48:08.800] I thought maybe she was questioning you or directing statements to you.
[01:48:08.800 --> 01:48:12.800] When I go in the court, if the prosecutor directs a statement to me,
[01:48:12.800 --> 01:48:17.800] I object and instruct the judge that this guy's not my buddy,
[01:48:17.800 --> 01:48:20.800] I didn't come here for idle conversation.
[01:48:20.800 --> 01:48:27.800] If he has something to say, please instruct him to direct his comments to the court.
[01:48:27.800 --> 01:48:29.800] That always puts him off.
[01:48:29.800 --> 01:48:34.800] If you go in like that again and she starts that objection, objection,
[01:48:34.800 --> 01:48:38.800] I'm not ready yet, Judge.
[01:48:38.800 --> 01:48:40.800] That'll set, that'll,
[01:48:40.800 --> 01:48:46.800] they will do everything they can to interrupt your train of thought and your momentum.
[01:48:46.800 --> 01:48:50.800] So object to everything.
[01:48:50.800 --> 01:48:57.800] You need to, have you been through jurisdictionary?
[01:48:57.800 --> 01:49:00.800] Oh, that's too long a pause.
[01:49:00.800 --> 01:49:01.800] If you're going to fight...
[01:49:01.800 --> 01:49:03.800] He dropped off the line.
[01:49:03.800 --> 01:49:04.800] Oh, that's why I got a line.
[01:49:04.800 --> 01:49:05.800] I think.
[01:49:05.800 --> 01:49:07.800] Wait, we were talking to Brian, right?
[01:49:07.800 --> 01:49:09.800] Brian, are you there?
[01:49:09.800 --> 01:49:10.800] Am I back?
[01:49:10.800 --> 01:49:11.800] Yeah.
[01:49:11.800 --> 01:49:12.800] Oh, okay.
[01:49:12.800 --> 01:49:13.800] I did, I dropped off.
[01:49:13.800 --> 01:49:17.800] Okay, so did you, have you gone through jurisdictionary, Randy's asking?
[01:49:17.800 --> 01:49:18.800] Oh, yeah, definitely.
[01:49:18.800 --> 01:49:22.800] I mean, and this was actually probably the best, I'm getting,
[01:49:22.800 --> 01:49:25.800] I'd like to say I'm getting a little better at these adversarial proceedings.
[01:49:25.800 --> 01:49:30.800] I definitely did better than the normal, better than I had before.
[01:49:30.800 --> 01:49:31.800] I mean, I improved on my skill.
[01:49:31.800 --> 01:49:36.800] One of my things I was going to ask you guys about next was about making my record
[01:49:36.800 --> 01:49:42.800] and how you suggest us pro-stays kind of make our record and what we do.
[01:49:42.800 --> 01:49:49.800] One of the primary ways you make the record is subject to everything.
[01:49:49.800 --> 01:49:52.800] Well, should I be writing that down, like as I'm...
[01:49:52.800 --> 01:49:55.800] You do everything in writing.
[01:49:55.800 --> 01:50:00.800] You will not always be in a court where a court reporter is available.
[01:50:00.800 --> 01:50:06.800] Even if you are, there is no guarantee the court reporter is doing his or her job,
[01:50:06.800 --> 01:50:08.800] especially if you forgot to state,
[01:50:08.800 --> 01:50:13.800] I move the court that all proceedings be upon the record.
[01:50:13.800 --> 01:50:17.800] Do not make the assumption the court is doing its job.
[01:50:17.800 --> 01:50:20.800] Do your due diligence and do everything in writing.
[01:50:20.800 --> 01:50:22.800] That's how you make your record.
[01:50:22.800 --> 01:50:29.800] And you might ask request of the court that the court recorder be required to make a voice recording.
[01:50:29.800 --> 01:50:36.800] Because you, we've had experience with court reporters having hearing difficulty.
[01:50:36.800 --> 01:50:40.800] They tend to have selective hearing loss.
[01:50:40.800 --> 01:50:45.800] Anytime the judge says or does something that's improper or inappropriate,
[01:50:45.800 --> 01:50:51.800] the court reporter tends to get this odd condition of selective hearing loss
[01:50:51.800 --> 01:50:53.800] and it doesn't wind up in the record.
[01:50:53.800 --> 01:50:57.800] And we don't want that to happen here.
[01:50:57.800 --> 01:51:03.800] And ask that he insists that she keep a voice recording or authorize you to...
[01:51:03.800 --> 01:51:06.800] If they haven't said anything about you keeping a recording,
[01:51:06.800 --> 01:51:08.800] then you have a recorder in your pocket.
[01:51:08.800 --> 01:51:09.800] Oh, yeah.
[01:51:09.800 --> 01:51:16.800] But if they insist that you don't record it and they search you
[01:51:16.800 --> 01:51:18.800] and they find the one that you were going to record it with,
[01:51:18.800 --> 01:51:22.800] then demand that they record it.
[01:51:22.800 --> 01:51:28.800] Now, well, what about like objections that I'm objecting to when it's adversarial
[01:51:28.800 --> 01:51:31.800] and I'm going back and forth with the prosecutor?
[01:51:31.800 --> 01:51:33.800] When I make those objections, I mean,
[01:51:33.800 --> 01:51:36.800] and this is what I think I need to get better at is stopping the court
[01:51:36.800 --> 01:51:40.800] so I can take notice and make sure they address the objection
[01:51:40.800 --> 01:51:44.800] because there was at least two objections that the judge didn't address this time.
[01:51:44.800 --> 01:51:45.800] Okay, this is how you do it.
[01:51:45.800 --> 01:51:47.800] Objection, the judge keeps going.
[01:51:47.800 --> 01:51:48.800] Objection, the judge keeps going.
[01:51:48.800 --> 01:51:51.800] Objection!
[01:51:51.800 --> 01:51:55.800] You can do that until the court listens.
[01:51:55.800 --> 01:52:02.800] I was in Las Vegas there for someone else and they started the case
[01:52:02.800 --> 01:52:05.800] and I stood up and said, Your Honor, I have business with the court.
[01:52:05.800 --> 01:52:07.800] And she ignored me.
[01:52:07.800 --> 01:52:11.800] Your Honor, I have business with the court.
[01:52:11.800 --> 01:52:17.800] And she stopped the court that time and then ordered me out of the courtroom.
[01:52:17.800 --> 01:52:23.800] But anyway, she stopped the court and didn't threaten me with contempt either.
[01:52:23.800 --> 01:52:30.800] So when you raise an objection, if it's not addressed immediately, you raise it louder.
[01:52:30.800 --> 01:52:33.800] You're not asking their permission.
[01:52:33.800 --> 01:52:42.800] The judge has a job, prosecutor has a job, you have rights.
[01:52:42.800 --> 01:52:48.800] So about disqualifying this judge, I mean, is that going to matter since they keep switching the judge
[01:52:48.800 --> 01:52:52.800] and I don't even know what judge is going to be assigned to the case, I mean, for the final trial?
[01:52:52.800 --> 01:52:55.800] Yes, you can keep each one of them committing disqualification.
[01:52:55.800 --> 01:52:57.800] Eventually, they're going to run out of judges.
[01:52:57.800 --> 01:53:05.800] The one thing is you're going to want to be sure that the judge has read all of the motions in the case
[01:53:05.800 --> 01:53:08.800] and read the complete transcript so he knows what's going on.
[01:53:08.800 --> 01:53:11.800] If he doesn't, you object to him.
[01:53:11.800 --> 01:53:13.800] He's an incompetent judge.
[01:53:13.800 --> 01:53:15.800] Where are you, by the way?
[01:53:15.800 --> 01:53:21.800] It's in Minnesota.
[01:53:21.800 --> 01:53:26.800] Do you donate $150 a month to the judge?
[01:53:26.800 --> 01:53:28.800] You know, I wish I could afford to do that.
[01:53:28.800 --> 01:53:30.800] It seems everyone else around here is.
[01:53:30.800 --> 01:53:32.800] In Minnesota, you can do that.
[01:53:32.800 --> 01:53:34.800] Yeah.
[01:53:34.800 --> 01:53:36.800] The judge is one of your contributors.
[01:53:36.800 --> 01:53:39.800] I hear about a request.
[01:53:39.800 --> 01:53:43.800] You guys know the company for fluoride is in Minnesota, right?
[01:53:43.800 --> 01:53:45.800] No, I didn't know that.
[01:53:45.800 --> 01:53:46.800] Mosaic?
[01:53:46.800 --> 01:53:51.800] Oh, it's that one, everybody from Minnesota, so never mind.
[01:53:51.800 --> 01:53:54.800] Don't go there.
[01:53:54.800 --> 01:54:05.800] It might be an appropriate question to ask the judge if the prosecuting attorney donates gifts under $150 a month to the judge.
[01:54:05.800 --> 01:54:06.800] I didn't think of that.
[01:54:06.800 --> 01:54:08.800] They're allowed to do that in Minnesota.
[01:54:08.800 --> 01:54:09.800] Right.
[01:54:09.800 --> 01:54:13.800] Yeah, that's part of the financial statements you want to know about.
[01:54:13.800 --> 01:54:18.800] Oh, if it's under $150, they don't have to report it, so that's why you ask them about it.
[01:54:18.800 --> 01:54:25.800] So since they denied all these motions, can I address that again or would that be inappropriate at the next proceeding?
[01:54:25.800 --> 01:54:29.800] Well, address it again.
[01:54:29.800 --> 01:54:38.800] If he claimed that the, and he may be right about the demand to be faced by your accuser, that's something that's done at trial.
[01:54:38.800 --> 01:54:40.800] But it's before the court.
[01:54:40.800 --> 01:54:45.800] For him objecting to it, he should get a bar grievance.
[01:54:45.800 --> 01:54:48.800] I should be allowed discovery before my trial.
[01:54:48.800 --> 01:54:51.800] I mean, that would be the only, right?
[01:54:51.800 --> 01:54:53.800] Yes.
[01:54:53.800 --> 01:54:56.800] But have you asked for discovery as a question?
[01:54:56.800 --> 01:54:59.800] Well, that was one of my motions.
[01:54:59.800 --> 01:55:02.800] Did you pull down my limiting motion?
[01:55:02.800 --> 01:55:03.800] No.
[01:55:03.800 --> 01:55:04.800] I haven't.
[01:55:04.800 --> 01:55:06.800] You'll love that one.
[01:55:06.800 --> 01:55:17.800] Yeah, that's another motion I'm working on to go in the traffic seminar material is that we make a motion in limiting that the prosecutor is not allowed to refer to the defendant as defendant or the accused.
[01:55:17.800 --> 01:55:20.800] They must refer to them by name.
[01:55:20.800 --> 01:55:21.800] Why?
[01:55:21.800 --> 01:55:24.800] Just because it puts a kink in their shorts.
[01:55:24.800 --> 01:55:31.800] But it also alludes to a predetermination of guilt in the eyes of the jury is how it can work out.
[01:55:31.800 --> 01:55:34.800] So we make a motion in limiting to tell them don't do that.
[01:55:34.800 --> 01:55:37.800] Okay. You understand what a motion in limiting is?
[01:55:37.800 --> 01:55:38.800] No.
[01:55:38.800 --> 01:55:40.800] I have not educated myself on that one yet.
[01:55:40.800 --> 01:55:41.800] A motion in limiting.
[01:55:41.800 --> 01:55:42.800] Don't feel bad about that.
[01:55:42.800 --> 01:55:44.800] I found one.
[01:55:44.800 --> 01:55:48.800] I was going when I first started researching, I went through court cases.
[01:55:48.800 --> 01:55:53.800] Greatest research you can do.
[01:55:53.800 --> 01:55:55.800] I found this motion in limiting.
[01:55:55.800 --> 01:55:57.800] I said, what in the heck is that?
[01:55:57.800 --> 01:56:03.800] It contains all the questions the other side is forbidden to ask.
[01:56:03.800 --> 01:56:05.800] I found a really good one.
[01:56:05.800 --> 01:56:09.800] It has every question you could think of in it.
[01:56:09.800 --> 01:56:15.800] It was in court and then the judge is going through it and he said, I ask for any training.
[01:56:15.800 --> 01:56:16.800] Oh, I'm sorry.
[01:56:16.800 --> 01:56:17.800] That's the Brady motion.
[01:56:17.800 --> 01:56:27.800] But I ask that the police officers be segregated from one another outside the courtroom in the
[01:56:27.800 --> 01:56:29.800] in limiting and he granted it.
[01:56:29.800 --> 01:56:34.800] We come into court and he refused to grant it.
[01:56:34.800 --> 01:56:40.800] We came into court on the second day and the sheriff repeated a statement that one of the
[01:56:40.800 --> 01:56:46.800] officers had made on the stand that he could only have gotten in improper communication
[01:56:46.800 --> 01:56:49.800] between witnesses.
[01:56:49.800 --> 01:56:51.800] I think that's what got me acquitted.
[01:56:51.800 --> 01:56:59.800] I found me guilty with no fine and no delta.
[01:56:59.800 --> 01:57:02.800] That makes it an acquittal.
[01:57:02.800 --> 01:57:05.800] Anyway, in limiting motion, Brady motion.
[01:57:05.800 --> 01:57:07.800] Brady motion is discovery.
[01:57:07.800 --> 01:57:11.800] In limiting motion are all the questions they can't ask.
[01:57:11.800 --> 01:57:13.800] I was looking at that Brady motion recently.
[01:57:13.800 --> 01:57:16.800] That's awesome.
[01:57:16.800 --> 01:57:22.800] Okay, so if he denies me a finding and facts of conclusion, that's violating a ministerial
[01:57:22.800 --> 01:57:25.800] duty which can go to official oppression, right?
[01:57:25.800 --> 01:57:27.800] Yes.
[01:57:27.800 --> 01:57:28.800] Okay.
[01:57:28.800 --> 01:57:29.800] Well, he's denying you a right.
[01:57:29.800 --> 01:57:30.800] You have a right.
[01:57:30.800 --> 01:57:31.800] That's not the ministerial duty.
[01:57:31.800 --> 01:57:32.800] That's a crime.
[01:57:32.800 --> 01:57:39.800] The ministerial duty is the judge has a duty to develop the facts in the case in accordance
[01:57:39.800 --> 01:57:41.800] with the rules of evidence.
[01:57:41.800 --> 01:57:50.800] If he refuses to allow a fact in that under the rules of evidence was a proper fact, he's
[01:57:50.800 --> 01:57:53.800] breached the ministerial duty.
[01:57:53.800 --> 01:58:00.800] If he fails then to apply the law as it comes to him, to the facts in the case, without
[01:58:00.800 --> 01:58:05.800] having an opinion about the law, he's breached a ministerial duty.
[01:58:05.800 --> 01:58:11.800] And that should get a judicial conduct complaint and he can be sued for that.
[01:58:11.800 --> 01:58:14.800] And that'll get his attention.
[01:58:14.800 --> 01:58:17.800] Okay, we are about to go to the top of the hour break.
[01:58:17.800 --> 01:58:19.800] You got anything else, Brian?
[01:58:19.800 --> 01:58:23.800] I just have one follow-up question to that if I could after the break.
[01:58:23.800 --> 01:58:24.800] Okay.
[01:58:24.800 --> 01:58:25.800] All right.
[01:58:25.800 --> 01:58:28.800] But quickly because we usually only give people like one segment, one caller per segment.
[01:58:28.800 --> 01:58:29.800] I appreciate it.
[01:58:29.800 --> 01:58:30.800] Thank you.
[01:58:30.800 --> 01:58:31.800] Okay.
[01:58:31.800 --> 01:58:32.800] After that we're going to go to Julie and then Mark.
[01:58:32.800 --> 01:58:34.800] So Julie, Mark, hang on the line.
[01:58:34.800 --> 01:58:35.800] All right.
[01:58:35.800 --> 01:58:36.800] We'll be right back.
[01:58:36.800 --> 01:58:38.800] Enjoy the top of the hour news break.
[01:58:38.800 --> 01:58:43.800] INN World Report radio callers, we like to call in 512-646-1984.
[01:58:43.800 --> 01:58:59.800] We'll be right back.
[01:58:59.800 --> 01:59:03.800] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[01:59:03.800 --> 01:59:07.800] Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:59:07.800 --> 01:59:11.800] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:59:11.800 --> 01:59:16.800] but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:16.800 --> 01:59:18.800] Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:18.800 --> 01:59:22.800] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:59:22.800 --> 01:59:27.800] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:27.800 --> 01:59:31.800] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[01:59:31.800 --> 01:59:37.800] providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:37.800 --> 01:59:42.800] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:42.800 --> 01:59:52.800] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:52.800 --> 01:59:56.800] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:56.800 --> 02:00:01.800] That's freestudybible.com.