ROL_2010-06-28_16k.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:04.480]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[00:04.480 --> 00:11.480]  BP said Monday it has so far spent $2.65 billion on trying to cap the well, clean up environmental
[00:11.480 --> 00:15.520]  damage and pay compensation to those affected by the spill.
[00:15.520 --> 00:20.660]  The pace of drilling the relief well has dropped to less than 100 feet a day as the company
[00:20.660 --> 00:25.960]  carries out the delicate task of closing in on the leaking well.
[00:25.960 --> 00:31.640]  The US Food and Drug Administration is seriously considering whether to approve the first genetically
[00:31.640 --> 00:37.840]  engineered animal that people would eat, salmon that can grow at twice the normal rate.
[00:37.840 --> 00:41.680]  A public meeting to discuss the salmon will be held this fall.
[00:41.680 --> 00:47.960]  Consumer and environmental groups are expected to raise strong objection to approval.
[00:47.960 --> 00:53.120]  Seven oxygen machines donated to the Palestinian Authority by the Norwegian Development Agency
[00:53.120 --> 00:59.240]  have been seized by Israeli officials en route to hospitals in the West Bank and Gaza.
[00:59.240 --> 01:03.560]  Israeli officials claim the generators attached to them came under the category of possible
[01:03.560 --> 01:08.420]  use for non-medical purposes.
[01:08.420 --> 01:14.160]  General Stanley McChrystal issued a devastatingly critical assessment of the war just days before
[01:14.160 --> 01:15.760]  being fired.
[01:15.760 --> 01:20.800]  Using confidential military documents, copies of which were seen by the UK Independent on
[01:20.800 --> 01:27.280]  Sunday, McChrystal briefed NATO defense ministers earlier this month, warning them not to expect
[01:27.280 --> 01:30.280]  any progress in the next six months.
[01:30.280 --> 01:34.800]  The general raised serious concerns over levels of security, violence, and Afghan government
[01:34.800 --> 01:35.800]  corruption.
[01:35.800 --> 01:41.440]  The McChrystal overview warned only a fraction of the areas key to long-term success were
[01:41.440 --> 01:44.480]  secure or governed with full authority.
[01:44.480 --> 01:49.500]  He warned of a critical shortage of essential military trainers for Afghan forces, of which
[01:49.500 --> 01:52.520]  only a fraction he classed as effective.
[01:52.520 --> 01:59.200]  McChrystal pinpointed an ineffective or discredited Afghan government and a failure by Pakistan
[01:59.200 --> 02:03.760]  to curb insurgent support as critical risk to success.
[02:03.760 --> 02:08.520]  According to informed sources, it was this briefing, as much as the Rolling Stone article,
[02:08.520 --> 02:12.200]  that convinced Obama he had to go.
[02:12.200 --> 02:18.960]  G8 leaders meeting in Toronto say it's important to accelerate efforts to make sure Afghanistan's
[02:18.960 --> 02:24.880]  own security forces assume increasing responsibility within five years.
[02:24.880 --> 02:29.040]  Leaders of the world's eight top industrial democracies also condemned the sinking by
[02:29.040 --> 02:34.920]  North Korea of a South Korean warship and called on Iran to do more to respect human
[02:34.920 --> 02:35.920]  rights.
[02:35.920 --> 02:41.200]  The countries of the US, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Japan, and Russia
[02:41.200 --> 02:45.440]  added that current tensions in Gaza were quote, unsustainable.
[02:45.440 --> 02:50.000]  The leaders turned to foreign policy matters after finding themselves at odds on how to
[02:50.000 --> 02:55.360]  continue to spur world economic growth in the aftermath of the worst recession since
[02:55.360 --> 02:56.360]  the 1930s.
[02:56.360 --> 03:16.440]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[03:16.440 --> 03:44.140]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[03:44.140 --> 03:50.140]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:50.140 --> 03:56.140]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:56.140 --> 04:01.140]  When you were eight and you had bad traits You'd go to school and learn the golden rules
[04:01.140 --> 04:07.140]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool? And if you get hot, then you must get cool
[04:07.140 --> 04:12.140]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:12.140 --> 04:17.140]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:18.140 --> 04:23.140]  You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one You chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father
[04:23.140 --> 04:28.140]  You chuck it on your brother and you chuck it on your sister You chuck it on that one and you chuck it on me!
[04:28.140 --> 04:34.140]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:34.140 --> 04:39.140]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:39.140 --> 04:50.940]  Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do? When they come for you? Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do? Or whatcha gonna do? When they come for you?
[04:50.940 --> 05:00.940]  Nobody now give you no break, police now give you no break. That old soldier man now gives you no break. That tifan ya adjustment now gives you no break.
[05:00.940 --> 05:29.940]  Alright, what are you going to do when we come for you, bad boys and girls?
[05:29.940 --> 05:36.940]  This is the rule of law, Randy Kelton, Eddie Craig, and Deborah Stevens.
[05:36.940 --> 05:41.940]  And I have a couple of announcements, actually just one announcement right now.
[05:41.940 --> 05:48.940]  I would like to announce to everyone, it looks like we have a new Patriot Hangout in town.
[05:48.940 --> 05:55.940]  Over here, right off of Cesar Chavez at Pleasant Valley on the east side,
[05:55.940 --> 06:00.940]  over next door to Planet K, my singer Pat and his business partner Matt,
[06:00.940 --> 06:04.940]  they have put together an incredible venue that's still in the works
[06:04.940 --> 06:07.940]  as far as building the amphitheater is concerned.
[06:07.940 --> 06:11.940]  But it's a great hangout and they've got a food kitchen there.
[06:11.940 --> 06:17.940]  It's called One Love Kitchen, 3109 East Cesar Chavez,
[06:17.940 --> 06:21.940]  right next door to the Planet K, right across the street from the Valero.
[06:21.940 --> 06:26.940]  So folks who are somewhat familiar with the east side, especially Cesar Chavez region,
[06:26.940 --> 06:29.940]  it's right across the street from the Valero.
[06:29.940 --> 06:30.940]  Everyone knows where that is.
[06:30.940 --> 06:31.940]  You can't miss it.
[06:31.940 --> 06:37.940]  And they start serving lunch at 11 and they go until around 10 p.m. on the weeknights
[06:37.940 --> 06:40.940]  and on Friday and Saturday nights they go late.
[06:40.940 --> 06:44.940]  And there's music and it's a great place to hang out and get some food.
[06:44.940 --> 06:48.940]  You can get some jerk chicken, which is a Caribbean dish.
[06:48.940 --> 06:52.940]  I'm not quite sure why they call it jerk chicken, but it's a spicy chicken dish
[06:52.940 --> 06:58.940]  with rice and beans, rice and peas, and a salad, all for five bucks.
[06:58.940 --> 07:05.940]  And you can get a grilled fish, grilled kingfish, same thing, salad, rice and peas, five bucks.
[07:05.940 --> 07:09.940]  Or you can get a tofu dish, excellent Caribbean cooking,
[07:09.940 --> 07:17.940]  and rumor has it that there might even be some free beers on the weekends.
[07:17.940 --> 07:24.940]  So folks, please go out and support the One Love Kitchen and the Horseshoe Lounge
[07:24.940 --> 07:28.940]  over at 3109 East Cesar Chavez.
[07:28.940 --> 07:32.940]  It's a couple of blocks east of Pleasant Valley at Cesar Chavez.
[07:32.940 --> 07:37.940]  Or if you're coming from 183, you don't go a few miles past Montopolis heading west.
[07:37.940 --> 07:42.940]  So that's what we're trying to make is the new regular patriot hangout.
[07:42.940 --> 07:44.940]  They've got lots of places to sit.
[07:44.940 --> 07:46.940]  It's right on the river, right on the Colorado River,
[07:46.940 --> 07:47.940]  gorgeous river.
[07:47.940 --> 07:52.940]  The place is about 15 degrees cooler than anywhere else in town in the summer
[07:52.940 --> 07:57.940]  because they have this gorgeous, fantastic breeze blowing up off the Colorado River
[07:57.940 --> 07:59.940]  and just an awesome view.
[07:59.940 --> 08:04.940]  So probably that's where I'm going to be hanging out on Saturday nights,
[08:04.940 --> 08:05.940]  a lot of Saturday nights.
[08:05.940 --> 08:10.940]  So folks, if you're on the east side, stop there for lunch, stop there for dinner,
[08:10.940 --> 08:17.940]  and support the One Love Kitchen and visit Planet K next door while you're there.
[08:17.940 --> 08:20.940]  So just want to make that announce with their new sponsor.
[08:20.940 --> 08:27.940]  So show them some love at the One Love Kitchen 3109 East Cesar Chavez.
[08:27.940 --> 08:29.940]  Okay, tonight is Monday night.
[08:29.940 --> 08:30.940]  It's traffic night.
[08:30.940 --> 08:35.940]  So Eddie's got about a half an hour or so to present some material.
[08:35.940 --> 08:40.940]  So, Eddie, why don't you let us know what you've got going tonight?
[08:40.940 --> 08:47.940]  Okay, I've sat down today and I've tried to outline a lawsuit to go against these.
[08:47.940 --> 08:51.940]  And what I've titled this is a plaintiff's petition for injunctive declaration
[08:51.940 --> 08:53.940]  of jurisdictional immunity.
[08:53.940 --> 08:56.940]  Now, I know it's kind of a long title, but as I go through this,
[08:56.940 --> 08:59.940]  you'll see why the name is formulated the way it is.
[08:59.940 --> 09:03.940]  And what I want to do is I want to read to you the sections of this
[09:03.940 --> 09:06.940]  and the way I've got it lined up so far.
[09:06.940 --> 09:08.940]  It starts out as in the name,
[09:08.940 --> 09:13.940]  plaintiff files his verified cross-complaint and petition for injunctive declaration
[09:13.940 --> 09:18.940]  of jurisdictional immunity against defendants for causes stated and shown herein.
[09:18.940 --> 09:22.940]  The answers to the questions posed in Subpart A herein are vital issues
[09:22.940 --> 09:26.940]  to the sustainable authority and validity of the respective constitutions
[09:26.940 --> 09:28.940]  and the people's right and authority to control
[09:28.940 --> 09:33.940]  and manage their servant government through the means and provisions thereof.
[09:33.940 --> 09:40.940]  Now, Subsection A poses 15 questions, and the questions are as follows.
[09:40.940 --> 09:44.940]  Subordinate only to the word of Almighty God as written within the Holy Bible
[09:44.940 --> 09:49.940]  is the Constitution of the United States of America, the supreme law of the land.
[09:49.940 --> 09:53.940]  Number two, within each individual state of the union,
[09:53.940 --> 09:58.940]  and as long as no provision thereof is in violation of the provisions and bill
[09:58.940 --> 10:02.940]  of rights within the Constitution of the United States of America,
[10:02.940 --> 10:07.940]  is that state's constitution the supreme law of the land within that state?
[10:07.940 --> 10:12.940]  Number three, do the respective constitutions grant or create
[10:12.940 --> 10:16.940]  the unalienable rights belonging to the people?
[10:16.940 --> 10:21.940]  Number four, are the people's unalienable rights inherent at birth
[10:21.940 --> 10:24.940]  and therefore automatically vested?
[10:24.940 --> 10:29.940]  Number five, are the respective constitutions based upon the common law
[10:29.940 --> 10:33.940]  as it existed at the time of their composition and prior to the formation
[10:33.940 --> 10:36.940]  of the United States of America?
[10:36.940 --> 10:41.940]  Number six, are the respective state and constitutions based upon the same
[10:41.940 --> 10:46.940]  common law as it existed prior to the formation of the individual states?
[10:46.940 --> 10:51.940]  Number seven, are both the federal and state governments bound by the precepts,
[10:51.940 --> 10:55.940]  mandates, and prohibitions written into these foundational documents
[10:55.940 --> 11:00.940]  and the writings documenting their intent, deliberation, and creation,
[11:00.940 --> 11:04.940]  such as the Declaration of Independence, the Anti-Federalist and Federalist Papers,
[11:04.940 --> 11:07.940]  and the writings of the Founders?
[11:07.940 --> 11:12.940]  Number eight, can government under its own perceived authority or power
[11:12.940 --> 11:16.940]  alter or abolish the common law foundation upon which these documents
[11:16.940 --> 11:22.940]  that created and govern its very existence and powers were themselves created?
[11:22.940 --> 11:27.940]  Number nine, if the government purports to claim such authority and power,
[11:27.940 --> 11:30.940]  then where within the people's documents is it stated that the people
[11:30.940 --> 11:34.940]  granted such power and authority to their servant government?
[11:34.940 --> 11:40.940]  Number ten, if such authority cannot be shown to exist, then by what authority
[11:40.940 --> 11:45.940]  can or does government declare that the common law be relegated to the past
[11:45.940 --> 11:50.940]  and or declared moot and subsequently replaced by a new concept of law
[11:50.940 --> 11:54.940]  created entirely by government such as statutory law?
[11:54.940 --> 11:59.940]  Number eleven, lacking any lawful grant of authority and power by the people
[11:59.940 --> 12:03.940]  to abolish or minimize the protections of the common law, by what expressed
[12:03.940 --> 12:07.940]  or usurped authority does the state legislature create statutory law
[12:07.940 --> 12:13.940]  declaring the common law of no or of minimal force and effect?
[12:13.940 --> 12:19.940]  Number twelve, if the people's rights and protections under the common law
[12:19.940 --> 12:23.940]  can be replaced by governmental fiat through statutory enactment,
[12:23.940 --> 12:27.940]  then by what means is government to remain bound as a servant to the people
[12:27.940 --> 12:30.940]  and the people's individual rights protected?
[12:30.940 --> 12:37.940]  Number thirteen, how, where, and when did the people decide and grant to any level
[12:37.940 --> 12:41.940]  of government the authority to replace or destroy our common law heritage
[12:41.940 --> 12:45.940]  and protections with another less protective, less effective,
[12:45.940 --> 12:50.940]  and fundamentally more offensive and oppressive form and body of law?
[12:50.940 --> 12:57.940]  Fourteen, if the people have not granted such authority, then is the common law
[12:57.940 --> 13:02.940]  under the respective constitution still the supreme law above any other form of law
[13:02.940 --> 13:06.940]  created by man when government acts against the rights, property,
[13:06.940 --> 13:11.940]  and interest of the people, either collectively or individually?
[13:11.940 --> 13:17.940]  And number fifteen, can any number of the people, either individually or collectively,
[13:17.940 --> 13:23.940]  come together and act or vote to abrogate or derogate the rights of another
[13:23.940 --> 13:28.940]  of any other one or more of the people absent a proper showing of harm by one
[13:28.940 --> 13:33.940]  or more of such people and without consideration of the proper procedures
[13:33.940 --> 13:37.940]  constituting due process of law?
[13:37.940 --> 13:41.940]  Now, those are the fifteen questions to be addressed.
[13:41.940 --> 13:46.940]  The remainder of the document, once I get it completed,
[13:46.940 --> 13:49.940]  is going to address those fifteen questions.
[13:49.940 --> 13:55.940]  Now, what I would like to do at this point is read the introduction that I've got
[13:55.940 --> 13:59.940]  that segues into the arguments and authorities.
[13:59.940 --> 14:02.940]  This is what we have.
[14:02.940 --> 14:06.940]  Being known and declared that we the people established and intended that our
[14:06.940 --> 14:10.940]  commandments to our servant governments, whether federal, state, or local,
[14:10.940 --> 14:15.940]  as set forth within the respective constitutions were and are to be followed
[14:15.940 --> 14:20.940]  to the letter and at all times until we cease to exist as a country
[14:20.940 --> 14:23.940]  and as individual sovereign republics.
[14:23.940 --> 14:27.940]  It must therefore be established and understood that there are certain facts
[14:27.940 --> 14:30.940]  in existence that are not born into this world by the declaration
[14:30.940 --> 14:32.940]  or codification of men.
[14:32.940 --> 14:36.940]  These facts do not exist because of some professed written declaration
[14:36.940 --> 14:40.940]  with any document, law, statute, or book.
[14:40.940 --> 14:44.940]  For example, the air that we breathe, it is a combination of oxygen and nitrogen,
[14:44.940 --> 14:48.940]  and the combination of these two elements into that breathable gas known as air
[14:48.940 --> 14:52.940]  was neither created nor exists because acknowledgement of its existence
[14:52.940 --> 14:58.940]  either is or is not codified within some document, law, statute, or book.
[14:58.940 --> 15:02.940]  It is simply fact, and man has nothing to do with it.
[15:02.940 --> 15:06.940]  Nor did man have anything to do with the creation of the two individual elements
[15:06.940 --> 15:10.940]  of nitrogen and oxygen, just as man had nothing to do with the creation
[15:10.940 --> 15:14.940]  or composition of any of the other naturally occurring elements we have
[15:14.940 --> 15:17.940]  documented in our version of the periodic table.
[15:17.940 --> 15:21.940]  These elements existed long before man came into being and will continue
[15:21.940 --> 15:26.940]  to exist far beyond our limited concept of time and space.
[15:26.940 --> 15:31.940]  In this same vein of pre-existence and preeminence, it is a fact that the
[15:31.940 --> 15:37.940]  respective constitutions neither granted nor created the rights of we the people.
[15:37.940 --> 15:41.940]  Our rights existed long prior to any enumeration or written declaration
[15:41.940 --> 15:45.940]  as to what those rights were and to whom they belonged.
[15:45.940 --> 15:49.940]  The respective constitutions neither granted nor created limitations
[15:49.940 --> 15:54.940]  and or restrictions directly upon we the people or our rights,
[15:54.940 --> 15:58.940]  but only to serve to act upon the people's servant governments
[15:58.940 --> 16:02.940]  and their various agencies, officers, agents, and employees.
[16:02.940 --> 16:06.940]  While acting in their official capacities, the power and authority
[16:06.940 --> 16:11.940]  of such public servants are subservient to the rights and authority of the people,
[16:11.940 --> 16:15.940]  and except where we the people specifically made delegation of an authority
[16:15.940 --> 16:19.940]  superior to that of the individual for the just protection of our private
[16:19.940 --> 16:23.940]  individual rights and property and the safeguarding of our public papers
[16:23.940 --> 16:30.940]  and property, governmental authority over we the people is non-existent.
[16:30.940 --> 16:35.940]  Amendments or alterations to the respective constitutions do not
[16:35.940 --> 16:39.940]  and cannot alter or abolish even a single one of the unalienable
[16:39.940 --> 16:44.940]  or vested rights of the people as they neither granted nor created those rights.
[16:44.940 --> 16:48.940]  And this remains true regardless of whatever date such alteration was made
[16:48.940 --> 16:51.940]  or previous number of attempts performed.
[16:51.940 --> 16:52.940]  We're going to break, folks.
[16:52.940 --> 16:53.940]  We will be right back.
[16:53.940 --> 16:56.940]  Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio.
[16:56.940 --> 17:02.940]  Please wait on.
[17:02.940 --> 17:06.940]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals,
[17:06.940 --> 17:09.940]  and coin supplies in the Austin metro area.
[17:09.940 --> 17:11.940]  We also ship worldwide.
[17:11.940 --> 17:15.940]  We are a family-owned and operated business that offers competitive prices
[17:15.940 --> 17:17.940]  on your coin and metals purchases.
[17:17.940 --> 17:22.940]  We buy, sell, trade, and consign rare coins, gold and silver coin collections,
[17:22.940 --> 17:24.940]  precious metals, and scrap gold.
[17:24.940 --> 17:28.940]  We will purchase and sell gold and jewelry items as well.
[17:28.940 --> 17:30.940]  We offer daily specials on coins and bullion.
[17:30.940 --> 17:34.940]  We're located at 5448 Burnett Road, Suite 3,
[17:34.940 --> 17:40.940]  and we're open Monday through Friday 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturdays 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
[17:40.940 --> 17:43.940]  You are welcome to stop in our shop during regular business hours
[17:43.940 --> 17:48.940]  or call 512-646-6440 with any questions.
[17:48.940 --> 17:53.940]  Ask for Chad and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or 90.1 FM.
[17:53.940 --> 18:01.940]  That's Capital Coin and Bullion, 512-646-6440.
[18:01.940 --> 18:24.940]  Look one again, who we are as the Christians. I wonder what I didn't have answered.
[18:24.940 --> 18:32.940]  We are as the Christians. Look one again, and they don't have the answer.
[18:32.940 --> 18:34.940]  So can sleep inside.
[18:34.940 --> 18:38.940]  They might not know the truth, but see, Lord, how they want we to make it easy.
[18:38.940 --> 18:41.940]  They might not lead to political union.
[18:41.940 --> 18:43.940]  They might get mad and angry.
[18:43.940 --> 18:48.940]  But they might stand up and fight and fight for their freedom and be free.
[18:48.940 --> 18:54.940]  When they let them love slavery and get help from the government, look one again.
[18:54.940 --> 19:04.940]  We are as the Christians. Look one again, and they don't have the answer.
[19:04.940 --> 19:13.940]  We are as the Christians. Look one again, and they don't have the answer.
[19:13.940 --> 19:22.940]  Okay, I'm going over the layout of a lawsuit that I'm preparing for us to use against government officials
[19:22.940 --> 19:24.940]  and government oppression.
[19:24.940 --> 19:28.940]  Of course, this is the rough graph. I've only worked on it for today.
[19:28.940 --> 19:33.940]  But I'm trying to get the idea out there so that if there are suggestions on content and composition
[19:33.940 --> 19:42.940]  that they will be forthcoming to help me refine it down and make it better for what it's intended to be.
[19:42.940 --> 19:45.940]  Let's see.
[19:45.940 --> 19:47.940]  I don't remember exactly which one it was on.
[19:47.940 --> 19:50.940]  I had to close the document to send a copy of it to Randy.
[19:50.940 --> 19:53.940]  But I will start with number 20 and go from there.
[19:53.940 --> 19:56.940]  If I've already read it, I apologize.
[19:56.940 --> 20:01.940]  Amendments or alterations to the respective constitutions do not and cannot alter or abolish
[20:01.940 --> 20:05.940]  even a single one of the unalienable or vested rights of the people,
[20:05.940 --> 20:08.940]  as they neither granted nor created those rights.
[20:08.940 --> 20:16.940]  And this remains true regardless of whatever such alteration was made or previous number of attempts performed.
[20:16.940 --> 20:18.940]  An unalienable right is inherent.
[20:18.940 --> 20:23.940]  It is not granted or given by any human act, law, or writing.
[20:23.940 --> 20:28.940]  It is endowed solely by Almighty God as a part of our every living soul.
[20:28.940 --> 20:36.940]  Neither the respective constitutions nor any form of government granted or created such rights belonging to the people.
[20:36.940 --> 20:40.940]  An unalienable right is automatically vested in every living soul at birth.
[20:40.940 --> 20:48.940]  It has no time constraint or delineation that establishes at which point it may be claimed as such claim is instantaneous.
[20:48.940 --> 20:55.940]  This is simply how it is, how it has always been, and Almighty God willing, how it always shall be.
[20:55.940 --> 21:03.940]  In contradistinction to an unalienable right, a vested right is one that becomes so because of its exercise over time and custom.
[21:03.940 --> 21:10.940]  A vested right is fundamentally understood as belonging to and being in the best interest of the one in whom the right is vested,
[21:10.940 --> 21:13.940]  and its exercise is accepted as such.
[21:13.940 --> 21:21.940]  However, an unalienable right and a vested right, though very similar and in many ways synonymous, are not exactly the same.
[21:21.940 --> 21:28.940]  The rights that are written into the Bill of Rights within the respective constitutions were not granted or created by those documents,
[21:28.940 --> 21:36.940]  but were so enumerated only to expound and clarify exactly what rights and ideals inherently belong to the people individually,
[21:36.940 --> 21:45.940]  and that the intent behind the general declaration of these rights was to ensure that the broadest application of protection for them was to be maintained.
[21:45.940 --> 21:52.940]  It was not to narrowly tailor them for the instituting of governmental exceptions to those protections.
[21:52.940 --> 21:59.940]  Societies are generally formed for two main purposes, both of which are based on individual self-interest and preservation.
[21:59.940 --> 22:05.940]  One of these reasons is common fellowship and its resulting circumstantial conveniences.
[22:05.940 --> 22:10.940]  The second is more basic and necessary to survival, which is to present a unified,
[22:10.940 --> 22:23.940]  countermanding force capable of acting in concerted fashion against any outside collective force or individual action that would presume to injure, murder, steal property,
[22:23.940 --> 22:27.940]  or attempt to destroy the rights of the people of that society and subjugate them.
[22:27.940 --> 22:35.940]  It shall be noted that an intentionally basic simplification of these two purposes is used in order to show that the people created government
[22:35.940 --> 22:41.940]  to serve their public needs and functions based primarily on these perspectives and realities.
[22:41.940 --> 22:48.940]  In order to ensure the protection of our individual, unalienable, and vested rights of life, liberty, and property,
[22:48.940 --> 22:58.940]  we the people created government to assist us with daily management and maintenance of the public necessities within our society and to provide for our common defense.
[22:58.940 --> 23:03.940]  And it is important to understand that government exists for no other reason.
[23:03.940 --> 23:10.940]  Government was not born, it was created, and it was created in all its various forms by the people.
[23:10.940 --> 23:17.940]  Therefore, it is subject to our will and completely dependent on our support for its continued existence.
[23:17.940 --> 23:26.940]  It is an established fact that the people may alter, abolish, and reform government either in its entirety or any part thereof
[23:26.940 --> 23:33.940]  in any manner they deem necessary or expedient in keeping that government in check and serving the people.
[23:33.940 --> 23:39.940]  This is clearly stated within virtually every constitution in existence in America today.
[23:39.940 --> 23:44.940]  This fact alone conclusively shows that government is not sovereign, it is servant,
[23:44.940 --> 23:52.940]  and it is subject to the will and exercise of the rights of the only true sovereigns under God, the people themselves.
[23:52.940 --> 24:02.940]  Government cannot and does not exist in autonomy, but only exists at all because of the people's consent, will, and support to maintain that existence.
[24:02.940 --> 24:10.940]  When government begins to operate in a manner or fashion that implies it has the right to exist independent of the people
[24:10.940 --> 24:20.940]  and that because it exists it has the right to subjugate the people through its own mechanisms and devices, the people and the union are in dire peril.
[24:20.940 --> 24:27.940]  At that moment all that the people hold dear to themselves and their posterity is in mortal danger of being destroyed.
[24:27.940 --> 24:34.940]  At that moment the servant has decided that it now has the right to declare itself master over its creator.
[24:34.940 --> 24:40.940]  This same scenario has played out before, long before the creation of the world as we humans know it.
[24:40.940 --> 24:47.940]  It happened when the archangel Lucifer rose up in defiance of God and declared himself of greater power and authority.
[24:47.940 --> 24:57.940]  Lucifer attempted to wage war and sow dissent and rebellion among the multitude of angels, imploring them to support him in his defiance against God, their creator.
[24:57.940 --> 25:02.940]  But in the end God cast Lucifer out of heaven along with all those that dared follow him.
[25:02.940 --> 25:09.940]  Fully one-third of the angels fell from grace, and peace reigned in heaven once more.
[25:09.940 --> 25:13.940]  The creator always was and is supreme.
[25:13.940 --> 25:21.940]  When governmental persons begin to believe and act as if they are superior, that they are somehow sovereign and separate from their creator,
[25:21.940 --> 25:26.940]  then the time has come for we the people to exercise our sovereign power and authority.
[25:26.940 --> 25:34.940]  It is the people's right to ensure that government persons act only in the servile capacity and purpose for which they were created.
[25:34.940 --> 25:41.940]  And when those persons consistently fail and or refuse to do so, it is time to cast them out.
[25:41.940 --> 25:50.940]  The respective constitutions were and are based, written, and designed upon a particular modality of law known as the common law,
[25:50.940 --> 25:59.940]  which existed and governed the people in their desired form of government long before, during, and after the time of their respective creations.
[25:59.940 --> 26:10.940]  If the respective constitutions are to maintain their original meaning and intent, then the common law must also be maintained as it is the underlying foundation upon which they are built.
[26:10.940 --> 26:19.940]  A sane and reasonable man knows that if you try to fundamentally alter or replace the underlying foundation of a structure after it is already built,
[26:19.940 --> 26:29.940]  such as a house, for instance, it is guaranteed outcome that you will introduce some form of stress to the overall structure that sits upon such foundation.
[26:29.940 --> 26:39.940]  It is absolutely unavoidable and will occur regardless of the type or number of precautions taken to prevent such stress.
[26:39.940 --> 26:48.940]  To introduce stress of this magnitude in nature is to necessarily introduce and cause harm to the structure itself in some form or fashion.
[26:48.940 --> 26:53.940]  If this stress were the only factor to consider, then the damage might be more easily mitigated.
[26:53.940 --> 27:05.940]  But there are always numerous and varying outside factors and circumstances that will assail upon the structure and compound the damage, sometimes overtly and sometimes imperceptibly.
[27:05.940 --> 27:09.940]  The harm to the structure may not immediately cause it to crumble or to fall.
[27:09.940 --> 27:13.940]  It may not even show immediate signs of the underlying damage.
[27:13.940 --> 27:21.940]  But over time, the evidence of the harm will reveal itself in some form or fashion and almost always at the most inopportune time.
[27:21.940 --> 27:24.940]  It is a foregone certainty.
[27:24.940 --> 27:41.940]  Since the respective constitutions have mandated certain particularities regarding the unalienable rights of the people and did so in order to ensure that no form or level of government could alter or abolish such rights by any means other than due process of law,
[27:41.940 --> 27:51.940]  then it is a simple operation of common sense that the rights so enumerated are also based upon the very same modality of law that the constitution and the cells are.
[27:51.940 --> 27:54.940]  That was and is the common law.
[27:54.940 --> 28:06.940]  The various forms of government are also bound by the requirement that an unalienable right is subject to removal or suspension only through the required due process of law as founded in the common law.
[28:06.940 --> 28:11.940]  Such is a mandatory and integral part of the people's ability to control governmental actions.
[28:11.940 --> 28:24.940]  As the abrogation or derogation of an unalienable right may only be achieved by following due process of law, it is axiomatic that a right cannot be subjected to regulation, licensing or taxation.
[28:24.940 --> 28:35.940]  That allowing such a thing could and would be used to circumvent the necessity of due process of law in an attempt to subjugate or destroy the people's unalienable rights,
[28:35.940 --> 28:42.940]  as is proven by every new legislative enactment and the news article evaluating the merits and effects of sane.
[28:42.940 --> 28:46.940]  Once such an act is deemed allowable and within the power of government,
[28:46.940 --> 29:00.940]  it becomes a relatively simple matter to deprive the individual of any right by setting unreasonable regulations, taxes or licensing fees so far out of reach as to make them unattainable, thus totally destroying the right itself.
[29:00.940 --> 29:05.940]  As these rights were so declared at the time of their writing within the respective constitutions,
[29:05.940 --> 29:16.940]  it can only be reasonably argued that these rights are based upon the same modality of law as the constitution themselves, which is once again the common law.
[29:16.940 --> 29:21.940]  Then we'll get into the body of the thing where we'll have arguments and authorities.
[29:21.940 --> 29:32.940]  The first section states that we have attached affidavits in the form of verified criminal complaints to this petition to establish facts not apparent from the record and incorporate them by reference.
[29:32.940 --> 29:35.940]  Okay, folks, we're about to go to break.
[29:35.940 --> 29:40.940]  I've got a very short amount left to go, so please hang in there.
[29:40.940 --> 29:42.940]  I will pick up on the other side.
[29:42.940 --> 29:46.940]  We should be able to get this wrapped up in one more segment, then we'll be able to start taking calls.
[29:46.940 --> 29:50.940]  This is Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio.
[29:50.940 --> 29:59.940]  We will be right back after this break.
[29:59.940 --> 30:08.940]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[30:08.940 --> 30:11.940]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[30:11.940 --> 30:12.940]  Brave New Books?
[30:12.940 --> 30:23.940]  Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin. They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[30:23.940 --> 30:26.940]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[30:26.940 --> 30:31.940]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[30:31.940 --> 30:35.940]  By UT, there's never anywhere to park down there.
[30:35.940 --> 30:43.940]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[30:43.940 --> 30:46.940]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[30:46.940 --> 30:51.940]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM, and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays.
[30:51.940 --> 31:00.940]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503, or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[31:00.940 --> 31:03.940]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[31:03.940 --> 31:14.940]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[31:14.940 --> 31:22.940]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[31:22.940 --> 31:27.940]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too.
[31:27.940 --> 31:33.940]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[31:33.940 --> 31:42.940]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[31:42.940 --> 31:51.940]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[31:51.940 --> 32:00.940]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[32:21.940 --> 32:30.940]  Tessin's a race for Mr. Bush. Tessin's a race for the teen.
[32:30.940 --> 32:35.940]  Well, I need a prosecutor to come and help me prosecute them wicked leaders.
[32:35.940 --> 32:38.940]  You see, the mama with the wrong lawyer, them tell me.
[32:38.940 --> 32:40.940]  Them a liar, not tell sweet stories.
[32:40.940 --> 32:42.940]  Me not believe, me say what them tell me.
[32:42.940 --> 32:45.940]  3% of America vote for Bush.
[32:45.940 --> 32:48.940]  So how the hell he get the president?
[32:48.940 --> 32:50.940]  That's why me have a warrant for him.
[32:50.940 --> 32:52.940]  Everybody listen carefully.
[32:52.940 --> 32:54.940]  It's into the world of litigation's process.
[32:54.940 --> 32:58.940]  Tessin's a race for Mr. Bush.
[32:58.940 --> 33:03.940]  For a warrant for a good teen.
[33:03.940 --> 33:08.940]  Tessin's a race for Mr. Bush.
[33:08.940 --> 33:13.940]  For a warrant for a good teen.
[33:13.940 --> 33:16.940]  Well, when a foot that rubs bill, warrant for him.
[33:16.940 --> 33:18.940]  All the cheney, warrant for him.
[33:18.940 --> 33:21.940]  Fight about the citizens in the country.
[33:21.940 --> 33:23.940]  Them getting so mad and them getting angry.
[33:23.940 --> 33:26.940]  We have some warrant we need to solve.
[33:26.940 --> 33:28.940]  Need a prosecutor come to come and help me.
[33:28.940 --> 33:30.940]  Prosecutor from any state will do.
[33:30.940 --> 33:33.940]  Come over and let me show them to him.
[33:33.940 --> 33:35.940]  Hear them teen, your mama tell you.
[33:35.940 --> 33:38.940]  Three shoes, that is true, that is true.
[33:38.940 --> 33:40.940]  Alright folks, we are back.
[33:40.940 --> 33:45.940]  We are going over the beginning structure of what may turn out to be a class action lawsuit
[33:45.940 --> 33:49.940]  for the people against their government when they don't wish to do what we tell them to do
[33:49.940 --> 33:51.940]  and how we tell them to do it.
[33:51.940 --> 33:54.940]  And I don't mean by having to go to court every day.
[33:54.940 --> 34:01.940]  I mean by the way we originally instructed them within the constitutions of the respective states,
[34:01.940 --> 34:07.940]  the federal constitution, and the authorities and powers that we granted to them therein.
[34:07.940 --> 34:17.940]  Now I've gone through everything down to where we are now going through the arguments
[34:17.940 --> 34:23.940]  and authority section which as of right now there are no specific arguments and authorities made.
[34:23.940 --> 34:27.940]  I've only got a couple of paragraphs in there and I'll touch on those real quick.
[34:27.940 --> 34:32.940]  When one or more of the people alleges constitutional violations and or usurpations
[34:32.940 --> 34:34.940]  by governmental actors or agencies,
[34:34.940 --> 34:39.940]  it is the duty of the courts to honestly and diligently evaluate such allegations and evidence
[34:39.940 --> 34:43.940]  in the light most favorable to the people and their unalienable rights.
[34:43.940 --> 34:47.940]  To presume to do otherwise is to make a mockery of the American Revolution
[34:47.940 --> 34:51.940]  and the sacrifice of the fighting men and women throughout our history
[34:51.940 --> 34:55.940]  whom risked all that they possessed, including their sacred honor,
[34:55.940 --> 34:59.940]  and willingly shed their blood, sweat, and tears defending those rights and liberties
[34:59.940 --> 35:03.940]  for each and every one of the people within this great country called America.
[35:03.940 --> 35:07.940]  And that same caliber of freedom-loving men and women have fought and died
[35:07.940 --> 35:12.940]  to preserve those rights and liberties not only in America for our own people,
[35:12.940 --> 35:15.940]  but for many other countries and peoples of the world.
[35:15.940 --> 35:18.940]  The courts have a duty to protect the rights of the people,
[35:18.940 --> 35:23.940]  to hold them sacred over any and all acts of government that would tend to deprive the individual
[35:23.940 --> 35:26.940]  of even the smallest of those unalienable rights
[35:26.940 --> 35:31.940]  without the proper and mandatory means and methods set forth in our constitutions.
[35:31.940 --> 35:36.940]  The very same means and methods that we the people declared to be the required
[35:36.940 --> 35:41.940]  and acceptable method providing for due process of law as it was known
[35:41.940 --> 35:44.940]  and exercised long before the founding of our country.
[35:44.940 --> 35:49.940]  And after that, we'll go down to the conclusions section when we get through
[35:49.940 --> 35:52.940]  with the rest of our arguments on the presentation of it.
[35:52.940 --> 35:56.940]  And the conclusion at the moment reads thusly.
[35:56.940 --> 36:03.940]  Therefore, plaintiff asserts that plaintiff is not engaging in any regulatable activity
[36:03.940 --> 36:08.940]  or occupation, but is exercising one or more of plaintiff's unalienable rights
[36:08.940 --> 36:12.940]  in a manner that is in no way a conclusive or evidentiary showing
[36:12.940 --> 36:17.940]  of a direct and palpable harm and detriment to any other member of the public,
[36:17.940 --> 36:20.940]  whether of their person or their property.
[36:20.940 --> 36:25.940]  Therefore, plaintiff is not and cannot be under the authority of any regulatory enactment
[36:25.940 --> 36:30.940]  created by the legislature and intended to regulate activities outside of those
[36:30.940 --> 36:33.940]  that are a part of plaintiff's unalienable rights.
[36:33.940 --> 36:40.940]  These rights include but are not limited to the right of life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness,
[36:40.940 --> 36:44.940]  acquisition and use of private property and material possessions,
[36:44.940 --> 36:49.940]  and to be free from intrusions upon those rights and or plaintiff's person or property
[36:49.940 --> 36:53.940]  by either government or any other one or more of the people.
[36:53.940 --> 36:58.940]  Therefore, plaintiff asserts that it is axiomatic that plaintiff owes no duty
[36:58.940 --> 37:03.940]  and therefore incurs no liability of any kind whatsoever to the public
[37:03.940 --> 37:09.940]  other than to ensure that plaintiff's actions do not violate the rights, person or property
[37:09.940 --> 37:12.940]  of any other one or more of the people.
[37:12.940 --> 37:17.940]  And unless and until plaintiff's actions are such that they act to harm or infringe
[37:17.940 --> 37:23.940]  upon the rights and or property of another one or more of the people in such manner,
[37:23.940 --> 37:28.940]  then no claim of harm against plaintiff by the government can lawfully stand,
[37:28.940 --> 37:32.940]  and such claim must be dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter
[37:32.940 --> 37:34.940]  and impersonal jurisdiction.
[37:34.940 --> 37:40.940]  Therefore, plaintiff asserts that government cannot and does not have any lawful claim
[37:40.940 --> 37:44.940]  against plaintiff unless and until the government can produce evidence
[37:44.940 --> 37:51.940]  of an actual palpable harm to another one or more of the people or their property.
[37:51.940 --> 37:56.940]  Therefore, plaintiff asserts that plaintiff's ability to exercise
[37:56.940 --> 38:01.940]  each and every one of plaintiff's unalienable rights end and or may be curtailed
[38:01.940 --> 38:06.940]  only where the exercise of those rights would constitute a direct and palpable harm
[38:06.940 --> 38:10.940]  to the rights and or property of one or more of the people,
[38:10.940 --> 38:14.940]  not because the government wishes to regulate or control the rights of the people
[38:14.940 --> 38:20.940]  through usurpations of legislative or rulemaking powers never granted.
[38:20.940 --> 38:28.940]  Then we have what would normally be the prayer, and it's two paragraphs, both short.
[38:28.940 --> 38:31.940]  For these reasons, plaintiff moves the court to issue an order instituting
[38:31.940 --> 38:36.940]  injunctive relief to plaintiff, said order declaring that statutory laws
[38:36.940 --> 38:40.940]  are intending to be regulatory in nature whether or not said statute contains
[38:40.940 --> 38:45.940]  any punitive provisions are of no force and effect upon the people in general
[38:45.940 --> 38:48.940]  and in the instant matter, plaintiff in particular,
[38:48.940 --> 38:52.940]  and that no such legislative enactment has any authority to act upon
[38:52.940 --> 38:55.940]  or otherwise regulate plaintiff or the people,
[38:55.940 --> 39:00.940]  and that said order is issued and intended to be effective on the behalf of plaintiff
[39:00.940 --> 39:04.940]  and the people of Texas and those temporarily within its borders.
[39:04.940 --> 39:08.940]  Plaintiff further moves the court to reiterate within said order that the people of Texas
[39:08.940 --> 39:12.940]  and all those within its borders have at all times the power and authority
[39:12.940 --> 39:17.940]  to perform citizen's arrest for violations of the common law that constitute
[39:17.940 --> 39:21.940]  felonies that become known to them and breaches of the peace that are committed
[39:21.940 --> 39:25.940]  in their presence, and that such power and authority encompasses the power
[39:25.940 --> 39:30.940]  and authority to arrest any and all public officials committing such violations
[39:30.940 --> 39:34.940]  regardless of title or position.
[39:34.940 --> 39:40.940]  And that's the end of it other than the signature block and so on and so forth.
[39:40.940 --> 39:45.940]  So that is where my thoughts and process have been today in trying to outline a way
[39:45.940 --> 39:49.940]  for us to get remedy.
[39:49.940 --> 39:52.940]  Now, this is, of course, a work in progress.
[39:52.940 --> 40:01.940]  It is not written in a form or fashion that is normally supported or used within common lawsuits,
[40:01.940 --> 40:05.940]  but all of you listening out there have to admit we are not in common times.
[40:05.940 --> 40:09.940]  We are not making common arguments the way the courts want to hear them,
[40:09.940 --> 40:13.940]  and we are not standing on the common ground that belongs to we the people
[40:13.940 --> 40:16.940]  as to where the government wishes for us to stand,
[40:16.940 --> 40:20.940]  which is only upon what they wish to give us.
[40:20.940 --> 40:26.940]  So though I understand that to many folks what is contained here is a lot of presuppositions.
[40:26.940 --> 40:34.940]  These presuppositions are based in what is known and written in the documents of the Founding Fathers
[40:34.940 --> 40:41.940]  through the debates known and recorded in the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers,
[40:41.940 --> 40:52.940]  the Constitution itself, the plethora of writings and historical books on those subjects that I have read,
[40:52.940 --> 40:57.940]  that I have attended classes on, that I have listened to others speak so dearly of
[40:57.940 --> 41:01.940]  or to spit upon in their dissertation.
[41:01.940 --> 41:07.940]  However you want to take it, these are precepts upon which America is founded
[41:07.940 --> 41:11.940]  and the rights of the people are built.
[41:11.940 --> 41:16.940]  There just isn't any other way the country could be set up the way it is
[41:16.940 --> 41:26.940]  and these not be the ideals supporting and holding together the structure of what was supposed to be America.
[41:26.940 --> 41:31.940]  Right now the House of America is in shambles.
[41:31.940 --> 41:35.940]  It is on the verge of complete and total collapse.
[41:35.940 --> 41:38.940]  It is not the fault of the builders.
[41:38.940 --> 41:45.940]  It is the fault of the maintenance people that we hired to ensure its well-being and safekeeping.
[41:45.940 --> 41:50.940]  And that, folks, is government.
[41:50.940 --> 42:00.940]  So we need to come up with a way to start making an impact, a real impact, a hard impact.
[42:00.940 --> 42:05.940]  And this is just one idea I've got for how we can do that.
[42:05.940 --> 42:10.940]  So I'm completely open on suggestions, recommendations, alterations,
[42:10.940 --> 42:17.940]  whatever will make it better, stronger, and more powerful for its intended purpose,
[42:17.940 --> 42:22.940]  which is to be used against the servant government and the individuals in it
[42:22.940 --> 42:28.940]  to show that we're done putting up with what we're getting
[42:28.940 --> 42:32.940]  and we're not going to take it or accept it any longer.
[42:32.940 --> 42:33.940]  All right.
[42:33.940 --> 42:34.940]  That's what I've got.
[42:34.940 --> 42:36.940]  So we've only got two or three minutes to break.
[42:36.940 --> 42:42.940]  So before we start taking calls, I would like to see if Randy or Deborah's either one has anything to chip in
[42:42.940 --> 42:49.940]  or add to this that can lead us into the phone calls and further discussion.
[42:49.940 --> 42:51.940]  Just one comment.
[42:51.940 --> 42:59.940]  If this accurately reflects the language of the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers,
[42:59.940 --> 43:08.940]  then I would like to see it crafted more closely using their language
[43:08.940 --> 43:13.940]  so that it doesn't just look like our opinion.
[43:13.940 --> 43:16.940]  What about putting footnotes, references?
[43:16.940 --> 43:17.940]  Well, there will be.
[43:17.940 --> 43:23.940]  That's what I didn't have time to do today.
[43:23.940 --> 43:27.940]  I wanted to get it all down, and then what I want to do is go back
[43:27.940 --> 43:34.940]  and I want to take the actual supporting documentation for each of the things that I've iterated here
[43:34.940 --> 43:41.940]  and turn them into the footnote section as you would at any other lawsuit.
[43:41.940 --> 43:45.940]  But folks, we will pick this up on the other side.
[43:45.940 --> 43:47.940]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[43:47.940 --> 43:49.940]  Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig, Randy Kelton.
[43:49.940 --> 43:50.940]  Please hang in.
[43:50.940 --> 43:54.940]  We will be right back after this break.
[43:54.940 --> 43:59.940]  Put the phone lines open.
[43:59.940 --> 44:00.940]  Attention.
[44:00.940 --> 44:04.940]  An important product from hempusa.org, micro plant powder,
[44:04.940 --> 44:08.940]  will change your life by removing all types of positive toxins,
[44:08.940 --> 44:11.940]  such as heavy metals, parasites, bacteria, viruses,
[44:11.940 --> 44:15.940]  and fungus from the digestive tract and stomach wall so you can absorb nutrients.
[44:15.940 --> 44:20.940]  Micro plant powder is 89% silica and packed with a negative charge
[44:20.940 --> 44:24.940]  that attracts positive toxins from the blood, organ, spine, and brain.
[44:24.940 --> 44:27.940]  This product has the ability to rebuild cartilage and bone,
[44:27.940 --> 44:30.940]  which allows synovial fluid to return to the joints.
[44:30.940 --> 44:36.940]  Silica is a precursor to calcium, meaning the body turns silica into calcium and is great for the heart.
[44:36.940 --> 44:42.940]  There is no better time than now to have micro plant powder on your shelf or in your storage shelter.
[44:42.940 --> 44:45.940]  And with an unlimited shelf life, you can store it anywhere.
[44:45.940 --> 44:50.940]  Call 908-691-2608 or visit hempusa.org.
[44:50.940 --> 44:52.940]  It's a great way to change your life.
[44:52.940 --> 45:12.940]  So call 908-691-2608 or visit us at hempusa.org today.
[45:12.940 --> 45:24.940]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one? If you could not reach anybody to love, what would your purpose have to be done?
[45:24.940 --> 45:30.940]  Watch your center line, the soldier or warrior of love, scuffle and they'll keep his heat.
[45:30.940 --> 45:41.940]  All they're taking is a misunderstanding, and somebody calls the police, watching the spots fly.
[45:41.940 --> 45:46.940]  Watching the spots fly.
[45:46.940 --> 45:49.940]  Okay, we are back, folks, and we're going to start taking calls.
[45:49.940 --> 45:59.940]  And the only comment that I had for now regarding the introduction and the axioms that you laid out,
[45:59.940 --> 46:07.940]  basically, if you're going to structure any kind of rules, okay, any kind of logic structure,
[46:07.940 --> 46:13.940]  like in common mathematics, we use Boolean logic as the basis.
[46:13.940 --> 46:18.940]  Any kind of logic structure that you're going to form, any kind of structure of rules of any sort,
[46:18.940 --> 46:22.940]  there's going to always have to be a set of axioms.
[46:22.940 --> 46:26.940]  And the axioms are what you start off with, which are unproven,
[46:26.940 --> 46:31.940]  which are accepted by all who choose to engage in that logic structure,
[46:31.940 --> 46:35.940]  that they are accepted as true without being proven,
[46:35.940 --> 46:42.940]  mainly because they are self-evident, just as the founding fathers said in their documents.
[46:42.940 --> 46:45.940]  We hold these truths to be self-evident.
[46:45.940 --> 46:46.940]  They don't need to be proven.
[46:46.940 --> 46:48.940]  They are a set of axioms.
[46:48.940 --> 46:54.940]  And so, like Randy made a comment on the break, is that these are a bunch of unstated presuppositions
[46:54.940 --> 46:55.940]  or unproven.
[46:55.940 --> 47:02.940]  Well, you can't prove everything, okay, because in order to prove a theorem in math
[47:02.940 --> 47:07.940]  or in order to prove a concept or a statement in logic,
[47:07.940 --> 47:11.940]  you're going to have to start with something that's not proven.
[47:11.940 --> 47:12.940]  That's just the way it is.
[47:12.940 --> 47:16.940]  You have to start with a set of axioms that are the foundation
[47:16.940 --> 47:21.940]  in order to structure any logic proof in any system of logic.
[47:21.940 --> 47:25.940]  And so, if we can't agree on the set of axioms,
[47:25.940 --> 47:29.940]  then we're not going to be able to agree on the subsequent proofs
[47:29.940 --> 47:34.940]  and the subsequent sets of rules and definitions that are based on those axioms.
[47:34.940 --> 47:38.940]  And that's why there's not argument in math and logic,
[47:38.940 --> 47:43.940]  because everyone agrees on their fundamental set of axioms,
[47:43.940 --> 47:47.940]  on the fundamental set of axioms that are used in those systems.
[47:47.940 --> 47:51.940]  And so, anyway, I just wanted to make that comment that, you know,
[47:51.940 --> 47:57.940]  you're never going to be able to prove everything because you have to start off with a set of axioms.
[47:57.940 --> 48:01.940]  And if we can't agree on the axioms that are laid out in the Constitution,
[48:01.940 --> 48:06.940]  well, then I guess what you're saying is that we need to rip up the Constitution
[48:06.940 --> 48:08.940]  and start with a new set of axioms.
[48:08.940 --> 48:12.940]  So what we're doing here is we're using the set of axioms
[48:12.940 --> 48:16.940]  that have already been agreed upon by the Founding Fathers
[48:16.940 --> 48:22.940]  and by people who love liberty and who are following down this line of path.
[48:22.940 --> 48:27.940]  So... Oh, man, wait, you just poisoned my well.
[48:27.940 --> 48:29.940]  I didn't know such thing.
[48:29.940 --> 48:37.940]  But there's so many axioms there that I got lost in them.
[48:37.940 --> 48:38.940]  Okay.
[48:38.940 --> 48:40.940]  There was an axiom on top of an axiom...
[48:40.940 --> 48:47.940]  I think that's just because Eddie hadn't sent you the document yet.
[48:47.940 --> 48:49.940]  Yeah, it could be.
[48:49.940 --> 48:53.940]  I understand that he didn't have time to...
[48:53.940 --> 48:59.940]  Well, Randy, maybe you want to write a new Constitution then.
[48:59.940 --> 49:01.940]  See, no, that's overgeneralization.
[49:01.940 --> 49:02.940]  Oh, okay.
[49:02.940 --> 49:06.940]  Well, anyway, my point was that Eddie was using the axioms
[49:06.940 --> 49:11.940]  that have already been agreed upon by our Founding Fathers in the Founding documents,
[49:11.940 --> 49:15.940]  the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, some of these Federalist papers.
[49:15.940 --> 49:19.940]  And so, anyway, he's going to be providing footnotes for that.
[49:19.940 --> 49:22.940]  I just wanted to beam up a little, is all.
[49:22.940 --> 49:23.940]  Oh, okay.
[49:23.940 --> 49:24.940]  All right.
[49:24.940 --> 49:27.940]  Okay, so we ready to go to the callers?
[49:27.940 --> 49:28.940]  Yes, ma'am.
[49:28.940 --> 49:32.940]  Okay, we've got a caller on the line, Aaron from Texas.
[49:32.940 --> 49:33.940]  Hey, Aaron, thanks for calling in.
[49:33.940 --> 49:36.940]  What's on your mind tonight?
[49:36.940 --> 49:37.940]  Hey, guys, thanks for taking the call.
[49:37.940 --> 49:40.940]  Eddie, I think that's awesome, man, and I hate to kind of go off on another tangent,
[49:40.940 --> 49:43.940]  but I can provide at least somewhat of a segue.
[49:43.940 --> 49:50.940]  The very last part of the document you talked about was pulled from arrests without warrant
[49:50.940 --> 49:54.940]  from the Code of Criminal Procedure about being able to have citizens arrest
[49:54.940 --> 49:56.940]  and being able to arrest when they're felling and things like that.
[49:56.940 --> 49:58.940]  Correct.
[49:58.940 --> 50:03.940]  And I'm going to bring that up.
[50:03.940 --> 50:08.940]  Tickets from an officer in Austin, our great city,
[50:08.940 --> 50:13.940]  and they're doing this fun little gig where one of them sits up on the overpass,
[50:13.940 --> 50:19.940]  a little radar gun, and then there's four or five or seven or ten motorcycle cops
[50:19.940 --> 50:24.940]  sitting, you know, 400, 500 yards down the freeway.
[50:24.940 --> 50:28.940]  And the top guy just sits there with the gun on the overpass,
[50:28.940 --> 50:33.940]  and radars everybody going by and radios down the license plate.
[50:33.940 --> 50:38.940]  Now, I've heard past discussion, and I know that that's just not allowed.
[50:38.940 --> 50:44.940]  The guy's accusing you of speeding when he didn't even see you speeding.
[50:44.940 --> 50:45.940]  That's correct.
[50:45.940 --> 50:49.940]  So I'm just wondering, is arrest without warrant the best place to start there,
[50:49.940 --> 50:56.940]  the very beginning where it says officer may arrest if the offense is committed within view?
[50:56.940 --> 50:59.940]  Is that the best place to start with that?
[50:59.940 --> 51:07.940]  Well, that would be the very first nail you would want to hammer into their forehead
[51:07.940 --> 51:13.940]  regarding that the moment the officer on the motorcycle pulled you over,
[51:13.940 --> 51:16.940]  he did not witness an offense.
[51:16.940 --> 51:21.940]  He is relying solely upon the hearsay accusation of someone else
[51:21.940 --> 51:24.940]  as to the commission of the offense.
[51:24.940 --> 51:30.940]  And the officer nowhere in Texas law is the officer given the authority to arrest
[51:30.940 --> 51:36.940]  for a misdemeanor if he did not witness the misdemeanor
[51:36.940 --> 51:42.940]  and does not have a warrant in his hand.
[51:42.940 --> 51:47.940]  So the fact that he is having someone else radio him the information
[51:47.940 --> 51:52.940]  and then proceeds to pull you over based upon a misdemeanor act
[51:52.940 --> 51:57.940]  that he himself did not witness and the fact that a traffic stop in Texas
[51:57.940 --> 52:02.940]  constitutes a custodial arrest,
[52:02.940 --> 52:07.940]  then you've got a lawsuit that will hammer him nine ways from Monday
[52:07.940 --> 52:10.940]  if you wish to pursue it.
[52:10.940 --> 52:15.940]  Okay, the police do this on a regular basis and they get it hammered down,
[52:15.940 --> 52:19.940]  they get it thrown out of court, and then they come back and do it again
[52:19.940 --> 52:25.940]  because they get hundreds and hundreds of citations before it gets thrown out.
[52:25.940 --> 52:30.940]  It is absolutely, totally and completely corrupt
[52:30.940 --> 52:35.940]  and they absolutely know it's corrupt, but they make money with it.
[52:35.940 --> 52:40.940]  That's right, and that's absolutely the reason it's done.
[52:40.940 --> 52:50.940]  That's why you should file a private attorney general suit for yourself
[52:50.940 --> 52:57.940]  and all others similarly situated and sue the officers personally.
[52:57.940 --> 53:02.940]  And that's where I was going next was, well, first off, in this individual case
[53:02.940 --> 53:07.940]  it seems like if the officer gets up on the stand to testify that I was going
[53:07.940 --> 53:15.940]  at a rate of speed that was greater than the reasonable and prudent speed,
[53:15.940 --> 53:19.940]  then I would be able to say, objection, hearsay.
[53:19.940 --> 53:24.940]  Well, what you would want is you would want a copy of the signed complaint
[53:24.940 --> 53:27.940]  and you would want to ensure that the officer that pulled you over
[53:27.940 --> 53:31.940]  was the same officer that signed the complaint
[53:31.940 --> 53:35.940]  because he is the officer that signed the citation.
[53:35.940 --> 53:39.940]  So one of the supporting documents is going to be perjurious.
[53:39.940 --> 53:43.940]  One of them has to be because the one on the overpass
[53:43.940 --> 53:46.940]  is the one that actually saw the alleged offense.
[53:46.940 --> 53:50.940]  He's the only one that can sign a complaint.
[53:50.940 --> 53:55.940]  The officer that issued the ticket is the only one that can sign the citation
[53:55.940 --> 54:02.940]  that's issued, and the complaint cannot be based upon a document
[54:02.940 --> 54:06.940]  for which there is no competent fact witness.
[54:06.940 --> 54:08.940]  And in this case, there isn't.
[54:08.940 --> 54:10.940]  There cannot be.
[54:10.940 --> 54:15.940]  Only the officer that saw the offense can initiate the foundational document
[54:15.940 --> 54:22.940]  that is the basis for the complaint and its stand in order to proceed to trial.
[54:22.940 --> 54:26.940]  Now, Randy's right that anybody can file a complaint for the purpose
[54:26.940 --> 54:30.940]  of an evidentiary hearing to establish probable cause.
[54:30.940 --> 54:35.940]  But once probable cause is found and a trial proceeds,
[54:35.940 --> 54:44.940]  then only a competent fact witness may be used to establish the facts in question.
[54:44.940 --> 54:46.940]  Well, there's another problem they have.
[54:46.940 --> 54:48.940]  The one who wrote the citation.
[54:48.940 --> 54:51.940]  He cannot be a competent fact witness in this circumstance
[54:51.940 --> 54:54.940]  because he did not witness the offense.
[54:54.940 --> 54:59.940]  The one who wrote the citation, that's aggravated perjury on its face.
[54:59.940 --> 55:00.940]  That's right.
[55:00.940 --> 55:01.940]  That's what I'm saying.
[55:01.940 --> 55:08.940]  One or more of the two documents themselves at the foundational level are faulty
[55:08.940 --> 55:13.940]  because one or both of them is going to be done under aggravated perjury.
[55:13.940 --> 55:16.940]  Because if the same officer writes the ticket, signs the ticket,
[55:16.940 --> 55:22.940]  and signs the complaint, he has falsely sworn that he saw the offense
[55:22.940 --> 55:27.940]  and had perfectly reasonable, competent, first-hand information
[55:27.940 --> 55:31.940]  to believe what he was writing in that complaint, and he doesn't.
[55:31.940 --> 55:37.940]  You need to subpoena all the citations that were written in that time period.
[55:37.940 --> 55:43.940]  You need to look at the time logs for the officers,
[55:43.940 --> 55:49.940]  find out what officers were present, how long they were detailed to that location,
[55:49.940 --> 55:53.940]  then seek out all the citations they wrote during that time
[55:53.940 --> 55:58.940]  and cite each one of the officers for aggravated perjury,
[55:58.940 --> 56:05.940]  false imprisonment for each citation.
[56:05.940 --> 56:06.940]  That ought to get the attention.
[56:06.940 --> 56:08.940]  And that's what I was going to go through next,
[56:08.940 --> 56:11.940]  was trying to figure out how to get them to stop this practice
[56:11.940 --> 56:14.940]  because just getting one ticket thrown out, they're still getting hungry.
[56:14.940 --> 56:16.940]  Well, you're not going to stop the practice
[56:16.940 --> 56:21.940]  as long as it gets them more money to do it than to stop.
[56:21.940 --> 56:26.940]  You will if you start going after the officers themselves,
[56:26.940 --> 56:28.940]  going after their careers.
[56:28.940 --> 56:31.940]  You need them all for an ongoing criminal conspiracy.
[56:31.940 --> 56:35.940]  So that means I have to submit it to the district attorney, right?
[56:35.940 --> 56:37.940]  No, you submit it to the grand jury.
[56:37.940 --> 56:43.940]  Yeah.
[56:43.940 --> 56:49.940]  See, this is one of the things that I am trying to write into this second book
[56:49.940 --> 56:53.940]  and document everything about what they do
[56:53.940 --> 56:55.940]  so that when we get before the legislature,
[56:55.940 --> 56:58.940]  I can hit them right on the side of the head with it so hard
[56:58.940 --> 57:08.940]  that their great-great-grandchildren have a dent.
[57:08.940 --> 57:09.940]  All right, very good.
[57:09.940 --> 57:14.940]  Is there anything else that I should use besides arrest without warrant?
[57:14.940 --> 57:16.940]  Yeah, the aggravated perjury.
[57:16.940 --> 57:22.940]  I know the motor vehicle personal transportation.
[57:22.940 --> 57:23.940]  I know that stuff.
[57:23.940 --> 57:25.940]  I know 543.006.
[57:25.940 --> 57:28.940]  I know those things, too, so I'm familiar with those.
[57:28.940 --> 57:32.940]  Is there anything else specific to this type of incident that I should use?
[57:32.940 --> 57:39.940]  The aggravated perjury, abuse of official capacity, and official oppression.
[57:39.940 --> 57:40.940]  Okay.
[57:40.940 --> 57:42.940]  False imprisonment.
[57:42.940 --> 57:46.940]  Aggravated kidnapping.
[57:46.940 --> 57:52.940]  And aggravated assault because they're all wearing guns.
[57:52.940 --> 57:58.940]  Very good.
[57:58.940 --> 58:02.940]  But by the time it's done, if you've got five or six officers,
[58:02.940 --> 58:05.940]  you're going to have a minimum of six charges each.
[58:05.940 --> 58:11.940]  You're talking 30 to 50 complaints in a matter of minutes.
[58:11.940 --> 58:16.940]  I can mail merge that.
[58:16.940 --> 58:20.940]  Yep.
[58:20.940 --> 58:22.940]  All right, folks, we're about to go to break.
[58:22.940 --> 58:25.940]  Aaron, is there anything else you want to hang on or are you done?
[58:25.940 --> 58:26.940]  No, I'm good.
[58:26.940 --> 58:27.940]  I appreciate it.
[58:27.940 --> 58:28.940]  All right, thank you, sir.
[58:28.940 --> 58:29.940]  Okay, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[58:29.940 --> 58:33.940]  Eddie Craig, Debra Stevens, Randy Kelton, we're about to go to break.
[58:33.940 --> 58:34.940]  Please hang in there.
[58:34.940 --> 58:36.940]  We will be right back.
[58:36.940 --> 58:39.940]  Yes, and folks, call in 512.646.1984.
[58:39.940 --> 58:43.940]  We've got open phone lines right now, and we've got one more hour to go,
[58:43.940 --> 58:49.940]  halfway through our broadcast, so please call in 512.646.1984.
[58:49.940 --> 59:18.940]  We'll be right back.
[59:18.940 --> 59:20.940]  We'll be right back.
[59:48.940 --> 01:00:04.940]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[01:00:04.940 --> 01:00:09.940]  CIA Director Leon Panetta says there are probably only 50 to 100 al-Qaeda
[01:00:09.940 --> 01:00:14.940]  fighters in Afghanistan and that most of the terrorist network operates from
[01:00:14.940 --> 01:00:15.940]  Pakistan.
[01:00:15.940 --> 01:00:19.940]  Panetta said the CIA is focused on killing the al-Qaeda leadership in
[01:00:19.940 --> 01:00:20.940]  Pakistan.
[01:00:20.940 --> 01:00:25.940]  Panetta also defended CIA drone strikes, saying claims they violated
[01:00:25.940 --> 01:00:29.940]  international law are dead wrong.
[01:00:29.940 --> 01:00:32.940]  U.S. Food and Drug Administration inspectors say they have found live
[01:00:32.940 --> 01:00:37.940]  roaches and dead roach carcasses too numerous to count inside the Denver
[01:00:37.940 --> 01:00:42.940]  facility of the world's largest airline caterer, LSG Sky Chiefs.
[01:00:42.940 --> 01:00:46.940]  FDA reports obtained through the Freedom of Information Act by USA Today
[01:00:46.940 --> 01:00:51.940]  also found ants, flies, debris and employees handling food with bare
[01:00:51.940 --> 01:00:54.940]  hands.
[01:00:54.940 --> 01:00:59.940]  Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi said Saturday world leaders believe
[01:00:59.940 --> 01:01:04.940]  absolutely Israel may decide to take military action against Iran to prevent
[01:01:04.940 --> 01:01:07.940]  the country from acquiring nuclear weapons.
[01:01:07.940 --> 01:01:11.940]  Berlusconi said, quote, members of the G8 are worried and believe
[01:01:11.940 --> 01:01:17.940]  absolutely that Israel will probably react preemptively.
[01:01:17.940 --> 01:01:21.940]  Britain's High Court Friday imposed strict conditions on the transfer of
[01:01:21.940 --> 01:01:26.940]  U.K. forces of suspected insurgents to Afghan detention centers after
[01:01:26.940 --> 01:01:31.940]  hearing evidence of detainees' horrible abuse in breach of international law.
[01:01:31.940 --> 01:01:36.940]  The court ruled a moratorium already agreed by Britain on transfers to the
[01:01:36.940 --> 01:01:41.940]  Afghan intelligence agency's National Directorate of Security facility in
[01:01:41.940 --> 01:01:46.940]  Kabul had to remain in place since there was a real risk detainees held there
[01:01:46.940 --> 01:01:48.940]  would be subjected to torture.
[01:01:48.940 --> 01:01:52.940]  The judges said transfers to the facility would breach British government
[01:01:52.940 --> 01:01:55.940]  policy and would therefore be unlawful.
[01:01:55.940 --> 01:02:00.940]  However, the transfer of suspects to NDS facilities in Kandahar and Lakshagar,
[01:02:00.940 --> 01:02:04.940]  the provincial capital of Helmand, should be allowed providing British
[01:02:04.940 --> 01:02:08.940]  monitors are allowed regular access to detainees.
[01:02:08.940 --> 01:02:12.940]  The court heard that detainees taken to the NDS had suffered beatings,
[01:02:12.940 --> 01:02:17.940]  electrocution and sleep deprivation and had been forced into stress positions
[01:02:17.940 --> 01:02:21.940]  and whipped with rubber cables.
[01:02:21.940 --> 01:02:26.940]  BP security personnel are being augmented by off-duty Alabama state troopers
[01:02:26.940 --> 01:02:29.940]  and Wacken Hut private security guards.
[01:02:29.940 --> 01:02:33.940]  BP security personnel ensure no observers are present on Gulf Coast
[01:02:33.940 --> 01:02:38.940]  beaches at night when BP contractors pick up and quietly dispose of dead
[01:02:38.940 --> 01:02:43.940]  dolphins, turtles, birds and other sea animals that wash ashore covered with
[01:02:43.940 --> 01:02:44.940]  oil.
[01:02:44.940 --> 01:02:49.940]  The website oilprice.com says BP is secretly disposing of the dead animals in
[01:02:49.940 --> 01:02:53.940]  order to avoid paying fines and compensation for killing endangered and
[01:02:53.940 --> 01:02:58.940]  protected species like turtles, dolphins and brown pelicans.
[01:02:58.940 --> 01:03:03.940]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[01:03:03.940 --> 01:03:09.940]  You are listening to the Rule Law Radio Network at rulelawradio.com,
[01:03:09.940 --> 01:03:23.940]  live free speech talk radio at its best.
[01:03:23.940 --> 01:03:30.940]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty.
[01:03:30.940 --> 01:03:37.940]  I read this book and it says it cares not for the unsightly.
[01:03:37.940 --> 01:03:46.940]  These warmongers come by that term rightly.
[01:03:46.940 --> 01:03:49.940]  I won't pay for the war with my fight.
[01:03:49.940 --> 01:03:52.940]  Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money.
[01:03:52.940 --> 01:03:55.940]  I won't pay for the fun with my body.
[01:03:55.940 --> 01:03:59.940]  Their plans wicked and their logic shoddy.
[01:03:59.940 --> 01:04:02.940]  Ain't gonna pay for the oil with my body.
[01:04:02.940 --> 01:04:06.940]  I won't pay for the boys with my money.
[01:04:06.940 --> 01:04:10.940]  Ain't gonna pay for the kids with my body.
[01:04:10.940 --> 01:04:13.940]  The whole agenda smells funny.
[01:04:13.940 --> 01:04:20.940]  I wanna fight in a wire of my own.
[01:04:20.940 --> 01:04:27.940]  That one would be less accident prone.
[01:04:27.940 --> 01:04:33.940]  I wanna pay for war of my own.
[01:04:33.940 --> 01:04:40.940]  They live in glass houses so I can watch them grow old.
[01:04:40.940 --> 01:04:43.940]  I wanna fight in a war I can win.
[01:04:43.940 --> 01:04:47.940]  I can never win the one that they have me in.
[01:04:47.940 --> 01:04:51.940]  That one, I lose one before it begins.
[01:04:51.940 --> 01:04:54.940]  I wanna fight in a war I can win.
[01:04:54.940 --> 01:04:57.940]  When I'm fighting for war.
[01:04:57.940 --> 01:04:59.940]  Whoa.
[01:04:59.940 --> 01:05:00.940]  Whoa.
[01:05:00.940 --> 01:05:01.940]  Whoa.
[01:05:01.940 --> 01:05:02.940]  Whoa.
[01:05:02.940 --> 01:05:03.940]  Whoa.
[01:05:03.940 --> 01:05:04.940]  Whoa.
[01:05:04.940 --> 01:05:05.940]  Whoa.
[01:05:05.940 --> 01:05:19.940]  Hi, I'm from Georgia. Gary, thanks for calling in. What do you got for us tonight?
[01:05:19.940 --> 01:05:25.940]  In our society, we used to operate under statutory law rather than common law.
[01:05:25.940 --> 01:05:38.940]  As everyone knows, they've gotten things turned around backwards. Who pays the salaries, who they contract with, that is with the public.
[01:05:38.940 --> 01:05:52.940]  As well as the Ministry of Procedures Act that Eddie is familiar with, and I certainly am, and it controls everything.
[01:05:52.940 --> 01:06:09.940]  And most of the statutes, they do not publish, say, for the feds in the Federal Register according to the substantive regulations and the force of effective law that would affect your rights and deeds.
[01:06:09.940 --> 01:06:16.940]  And certainly, they want to regulate people. So there are certainly facts that are not in the evidence.
[01:06:16.940 --> 01:06:33.940]  So the main purpose of the call is to see if Eddie will make available the wonderful language, because I could use it against, as we call here, grants, cops, or just anyone that works for us,
[01:06:33.940 --> 01:06:51.940]  and he does not come within the confines of his legal duties for his contract says. And so if he can make that available, you know, it would be very – I certainly would appreciate it.
[01:06:51.940 --> 01:06:57.940]  Yeah, Gary, I'd be perfectly happy to do that. If you would, however, please go ahead and send me an email.
[01:06:57.940 --> 01:07:05.940]  The one that we talked about where I was going to get that young lady and you together to talk about that ticket in Georgia, I never did get an email from you.
[01:07:05.940 --> 01:07:12.940]  I know. I sent an email. It's 1cdog at aol.com, but nevertheless, sir.
[01:07:12.940 --> 01:07:17.940]  All right. Well, if you'll send me another one, I'll make very careful consideration to look for it.
[01:07:17.940 --> 01:07:27.940]  Okay, because I do send – I started sending you as well as Randy court cases at the present time.
[01:07:27.940 --> 01:07:45.940]  I am certainly in court cases that can prove unequivocally that there are no legislative regulations, as you know, for private parties for the driving issue in Georgia and other states as well as so-called income tax.
[01:07:45.940 --> 01:08:00.940]  So again, sir, I will send – I will make a special request, but if you'll look for my email, you will receive some very relevant case law just like Randy received.
[01:08:00.940 --> 01:08:01.940]  Yes, sir. I appreciate it.
[01:08:01.940 --> 01:08:06.940]  I have a very large 1cdog file.
[01:08:06.940 --> 01:08:11.940]  I enjoy it, guys. God bless and have a nice night. Good night, sir.
[01:08:11.940 --> 01:08:17.940]  Thank you, sir.
[01:08:17.940 --> 01:08:28.940]  Okay, we don't have any callers right now, so callers, if you'd like to call in, 512-646-1984.
[01:08:28.940 --> 01:08:30.940]  All right.
[01:08:30.940 --> 01:08:41.940]  Do the respective constitutions grant or create unalienable rights belonging to the people?
[01:08:41.940 --> 01:08:44.940]  Yeah, that's question number three.
[01:08:44.940 --> 01:08:48.940]  Okay, and we do have another caller now.
[01:08:48.940 --> 01:08:50.940]  Okay, well, Randy, it sounds like he's having –
[01:08:50.940 --> 01:08:51.940]  Yeah, go ahead.
[01:08:51.940 --> 01:08:52.940]  Go ahead, Randy.
[01:08:52.940 --> 01:09:03.940]  No, I'm trying to get to the – understand why it's written that way. Do the respective constitutions –
[01:09:03.940 --> 01:09:12.940]  Does either the federal or the individual state constitutions grant or create the unalienable rights belonging to the people?
[01:09:12.940 --> 01:09:27.940]  Isn't that a say no question? Are the respective constitutions based upon common law as it existed at the time of their composition and prior to the formation of the United States of America?
[01:09:27.940 --> 01:09:29.940]  You went to a completely different question.
[01:09:29.940 --> 01:09:32.940]  Let's go on to the caller. I'm just kind of thinking out loud.
[01:09:32.940 --> 01:09:35.940]  Okay.
[01:09:35.940 --> 01:09:40.940]  Okay, we've got Bill in Texas. Bill, thanks for calling in. What's on your mind tonight?
[01:09:40.940 --> 01:09:52.940]  Bill, I've got a couple of questions for you. I called a week ago today, I believe it was, talking about a court deal out in Georgetown through the City of Leander,
[01:09:52.940 --> 01:10:06.940]  and I found out that the Barry Knight and Associates in Austin, Texas supplies the City of Leander with their city attorney, and he was also the prosecuting attorney.
[01:10:06.940 --> 01:10:15.940]  I have run into a little obstacle over at the clerk's office of Leander. She's given me the runaround on trying to get the documents.
[01:10:15.940 --> 01:10:26.940]  At first she told me that they would send the information to the city so that they could pull the files for me, the court docket from the original trial,
[01:10:26.940 --> 01:10:38.940]  and when I talked to her on the phone, she failed to tell me about the Barney Knight and Associates supplying the attorney, so I didn't get a response back from her.
[01:10:38.940 --> 01:10:49.940]  She was supposed to call me back. I went over there in person, and that's when she told me about the attorney being a hired gun, and I still do not have his name.
[01:10:49.940 --> 01:10:56.940]  Can I file a Freedom of Information Act against the Barry Knight and Associates to give me his name?
[01:10:56.940 --> 01:10:59.940]  Well, they can have it in the court documents.
[01:10:59.940 --> 01:11:06.940]  Well, the City of Leander has given me the runaround on getting the court documents. They're telling me it's going to take up to two weeks to get it.
[01:11:06.940 --> 01:11:12.940]  Okay, here's the deal. Write this down. 27004 Government Code.
[01:11:12.940 --> 01:11:20.940]  27.004. Okay, 27.004. Okay.
[01:11:20.940 --> 01:11:27.940]  This is a statute that refers to the JP and municipal courts.
[01:11:27.940 --> 01:11:41.940]  The county and district courts can request, can ask for a written request and take up to 10 days to respond, but the county, but the municipal and JP courts cannot.
[01:11:41.940 --> 01:11:46.940]  Okay. That's what 27004 Government Code goes to.
[01:11:46.940 --> 01:11:50.940]  Okay. So they must produce it immediately. Okay.
[01:11:50.940 --> 01:12:03.940]  If you go down there, I suggest you make every request in writing, hand it to the clerk. When she gives you this 10-day stuff, I just dial 911.
[01:12:03.940 --> 01:12:09.940]  Okay. Or get security when you go in the door. You don't want them calling security on you.
[01:12:09.940 --> 01:12:13.940]  Okay. So when you go in the door, ask if there is a police officer in the building.
[01:12:13.940 --> 01:12:19.940]  Okay. Go find him, tell him, I'm going to need you. I think somebody's going to commit a crime.
[01:12:19.940 --> 01:12:23.940]  Okay. And take them with you to the clerk.
[01:12:23.940 --> 01:12:29.940]  Okay. And then ask the clerk for it. Make sure you have 27004 Government Code in your hand.
[01:12:29.940 --> 01:12:38.940]  Okay. It requires them to keep their, all records open for public inspection by all interested parties at all reasonable times.
[01:12:38.940 --> 01:12:49.940]  Okay. And I think it's JM124 that defines reasonable party, interested parties as members of the public, reasonable times, normal business hours.
[01:12:49.940 --> 01:12:52.940]  Doesn't give them 10 days, doesn't give them 10 minutes.
[01:12:52.940 --> 01:12:55.940]  Okay. No requests, no delay.
[01:12:55.940 --> 01:13:02.940]  Okay. So when they tell you they can't get you the documents, ask the officer to arrest her.
[01:13:02.940 --> 01:13:04.940]  Okay. And he's going to refuse.
[01:13:04.940 --> 01:13:08.940]  Okay. Then I want you to take my criminal complaint against her.
[01:13:08.940 --> 01:13:10.940]  Okay.
[01:13:10.940 --> 01:13:11.940]  That'll get their attention.
[01:13:11.940 --> 01:13:17.940]  All right. I was pondering, my next door neighbor is a Burnett County Sheriff's Deputy.
[01:13:17.940 --> 01:13:23.940]  I was pondering taking him over there with me in his uniform as a witness.
[01:13:23.940 --> 01:13:25.940]  Don't put him on the dime.
[01:13:25.940 --> 01:13:26.940]  Okay.
[01:13:26.940 --> 01:13:29.940]  Get someone that you don't mind kicking in the teeth.
[01:13:29.940 --> 01:13:33.940]  Okay. All right. Fair enough. Yeah, I like him.
[01:13:33.940 --> 01:13:35.940]  You might get him in trouble.
[01:13:35.940 --> 01:13:39.940]  Yeah, I don't want to do that. I like him too much.
[01:13:39.940 --> 01:13:52.940]  The next question was, can I still file an extension over here at Williamson County even though they've given me the final two notices of appearance?
[01:13:52.940 --> 01:13:56.940]  What's the nature of the notice of appearance?
[01:13:56.940 --> 01:14:00.940]  It's just got the time and date and where to be.
[01:14:00.940 --> 01:14:02.940]  No, appearance for what?
[01:14:02.940 --> 01:14:07.940]  For, I believe it is for the jury trial and then the final sentence thing.
[01:14:07.940 --> 01:14:11.940]  Okay, wait a minute, wait a minute. Jury trial for what?
[01:14:11.940 --> 01:14:16.940]  For the, well I called you last week Monday and we had a long discussion.
[01:14:16.940 --> 01:14:18.940]  Okay, wait, wait, wait. Unfair, unfair.
[01:14:18.940 --> 01:14:19.940]  I'm sorry.
[01:14:19.940 --> 01:14:20.940]  It's been a busy week.
[01:14:20.940 --> 01:14:21.940]  I'm sorry.
[01:14:21.940 --> 01:14:24.940]  And we've got a lot of listeners who have no idea what's going on.
[01:14:24.940 --> 01:14:34.940]  It was, the original citation was the transportation code violation for failure to yield.
[01:14:34.940 --> 01:14:41.940]  And that was five, four, no four, five, four point, I don't have it in front of me.
[01:14:41.940 --> 01:14:42.940]  I'm sorry.
[01:14:42.940 --> 01:14:53.940]  And anyhow, we've gone through the municipal and we're now over at the county under appeal and there's two court dates left.
[01:14:53.940 --> 01:14:58.940]  And I was wondering if I could file an extension at this point just to give us a little more time
[01:14:58.940 --> 01:15:04.940]  because I've had trouble getting all this together to give to you because there's so much information.
[01:15:04.940 --> 01:15:10.940]  And we've emailed forwarded email to you today with part of the information
[01:15:10.940 --> 01:15:15.940]  but we're still not done putting it on the computer to get it to you.
[01:15:15.940 --> 01:15:16.940]  Okay, wait a minute.
[01:15:16.940 --> 01:15:22.940]  I hope you didn't send me a stack of information with no narrative.
[01:15:22.940 --> 01:15:25.940]  No, no.
[01:15:25.940 --> 01:15:31.940]  No, does that mean there is no narrative or no, you wouldn't send some stuff to me without it?
[01:15:31.940 --> 01:15:33.940]  I don't believe I would send it to you without the narrative.
[01:15:33.940 --> 01:15:36.940]  I was trying to follow the...
[01:15:36.940 --> 01:15:44.940]  Without a narrative, there's no way I have time to read stacks and stacks of documents and try to figure out what the heck they are.
[01:15:44.940 --> 01:15:49.940]  It's the narrative of what happened at the different days that we were at court.
[01:15:49.940 --> 01:15:54.940]  Following your outline that you emailed me an outline and that's what I tried to follow.
[01:15:54.940 --> 01:15:58.940]  Yeah, that's the information I sent you.
[01:15:58.940 --> 01:15:59.940]  Good, good.
[01:15:59.940 --> 01:16:00.940]  As long as I've got a model.
[01:16:00.940 --> 01:16:01.940]  Yes, yes.
[01:16:01.940 --> 01:16:02.940]  This happened, this happened.
[01:16:02.940 --> 01:16:06.940]  So when I read a document, I can look at the model and I kind of know where it goes.
[01:16:06.940 --> 01:16:07.940]  Yes, yes.
[01:16:07.940 --> 01:16:11.940]  I tried to follow your outline as best as I could starting with the most previous thing
[01:16:11.940 --> 01:16:18.940]  and working my way down everything that happened at that particular day in that courtroom and so on.
[01:16:18.940 --> 01:16:19.940]  Okay, good.
[01:16:19.940 --> 01:16:20.940]  Yeah, yeah, that's there.
[01:16:20.940 --> 01:16:23.940]  Okay, we'll try to get to it.
[01:16:23.940 --> 01:16:27.940]  Actually, I'll try to get Eddie to get to it.
[01:16:27.940 --> 01:16:29.940]  Okay, one more quick question.
[01:16:29.940 --> 01:16:33.940]  When I was in the courthouse over there, I dialed 911.
[01:16:33.940 --> 01:16:37.940]  How do I get the 911 tape, a copy of that 911 tape?
[01:16:37.940 --> 01:16:42.940]  You can make a request to the Sheriff's Department, whoever has the 911.
[01:16:42.940 --> 01:16:46.940]  The system, I find the 911 system in the Sheriff's Department and request it from them.
[01:16:46.940 --> 01:16:48.940]  Yeah, it's generally the Sheriff's Department.
[01:16:48.940 --> 01:16:50.940]  Okay, we're about to go to break.
[01:16:50.940 --> 01:16:59.940]  Randy Kelton, Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, we'll be right back.
[01:16:59.940 --> 01:17:05.940]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy,
[01:17:05.940 --> 01:17:08.940]  and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:17:08.940 --> 01:17:11.940]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[01:17:11.940 --> 01:17:12.940]  Brave New Books?
[01:17:12.940 --> 01:17:18.940]  Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[01:17:18.940 --> 01:17:22.940]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:17:22.940 --> 01:17:25.940]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:17:25.940 --> 01:17:30.940]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:17:30.940 --> 01:17:34.940]  By UT, there's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:17:34.940 --> 01:17:41.940]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility, just behind the bookstore.
[01:17:41.940 --> 01:17:45.940]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:17:45.940 --> 01:17:50.940]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM, and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays.
[01:17:50.940 --> 01:18:12.940]  So get them a call at 512-480-2503, or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:18:20.940 --> 01:18:29.940]  Great, folks.
[01:18:29.940 --> 01:18:35.940]  We're taking your calls, 512-646-1984.
[01:18:35.940 --> 01:18:39.940]  We've got Ken in Texas. Ken, thanks for calling in.
[01:18:39.940 --> 01:18:41.940]  What's your question tonight?
[01:18:41.940 --> 01:18:45.940]  Well, I just wanted to add something that's pretty quick and easy.
[01:18:45.940 --> 01:18:55.940]  It's about the transportation code and how it really doesn't apply to most of us unless we're in commerce.
[01:18:55.940 --> 01:19:01.940]  Here's another angle that you might be able to use in defense of your traffic tickets,
[01:19:01.940 --> 01:19:06.940]  and I'm sure Eddie has said this before, but maybe I'll just rephrase it.
[01:19:06.940 --> 01:19:13.940]  Anyway, I did a public information request that I'd mentioned earlier to find out which municipalities in Texas
[01:19:13.940 --> 01:19:15.940]  are authorized to enforce the traffic code.
[01:19:15.940 --> 01:19:18.940]  It turns out there's only 45 of them.
[01:19:18.940 --> 01:19:24.940]  I did a further inquiry about the city I had in question as to whether the certain policeman who issued a citation to me
[01:19:24.940 --> 01:19:33.940]  was specifically authorized himself to enforce the traffic code, and it turns out he is not.
[01:19:33.940 --> 01:19:36.940]  In the city I'm talking about, there's nearly 500 policemen.
[01:19:36.940 --> 01:19:38.940]  There's only six that are authorized.
[01:19:38.940 --> 01:19:43.940]  So I will go out there on a limb and say that almost, let me say,
[01:19:43.940 --> 01:19:50.940]  a small number of police are authorized to enforce the traffic code anywhere in Texas.
[01:19:50.940 --> 01:19:57.940]  So it might be a simpler way to win a case rather than to prove that you don't have to register your vehicle
[01:19:57.940 --> 01:20:05.940]  or don't have a driver's license or whatever falls under the transportation code to just go and do a public information request,
[01:20:05.940 --> 01:20:09.940]  to find out whether that officer can enforce that at all anyway, and if he can't,
[01:20:09.940 --> 01:20:15.940]  I don't think it's relevant as to whether or not you have it or you did it.
[01:20:15.940 --> 01:20:22.940]  Well, at that point, what you should be doing, however, is still going after the officer for acting under an authority he did not have.
[01:20:22.940 --> 01:20:23.940]  Sure.
[01:20:23.940 --> 01:20:28.940]  You wish to make what they did as painful for them to continue to do as possible.
[01:20:28.940 --> 01:20:29.940]  Right.
[01:20:29.940 --> 01:20:32.940]  Yeah, that's a very good issue.
[01:20:32.940 --> 01:20:41.940]  It's just that before you get to the officer, you go to subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:20:41.940 --> 01:20:55.940]  Go to the court first, the prosecutor second, or the court, the judge first, the prosecutor, the municipality first, judge, prosecutor.
[01:20:55.940 --> 01:20:58.940]  Then we get to the officer.
[01:20:58.940 --> 01:21:01.940]  And that's a really good tact to take.
[01:21:01.940 --> 01:21:10.940]  How did you get them to tell you that the officer wasn't qualified to enforce the traffic code?
[01:21:10.940 --> 01:21:18.940]  Well, the information request I have available on my website, if I can mention the name, the other people can look at it and use it as a tool.
[01:21:18.940 --> 01:21:19.940]  Yes, go ahead.
[01:21:19.940 --> 01:21:28.940]  It's municipalcourtfraud.com, and it says who's entitled to enforce the traffic code in Texas, municipalcourtfraud.com.
[01:21:28.940 --> 01:21:32.940]  Anyway, there's the actual PIR and the response, which lists the counties.
[01:21:32.940 --> 01:21:38.940]  Now, a person can use that same PIR request or that information in it.
[01:21:38.940 --> 01:21:47.940]  And I specifically asked the DPS administrator, general counsel, which, I said,
[01:21:47.940 --> 01:21:59.940]  which officers do you show in your database that are authorized to administer the transportation code in this particular city?
[01:21:59.940 --> 01:22:08.940]  I didn't ask him which ones are employed by, because he may not know, but I said, which, according to your records, does it show that they work for this city?
[01:22:08.940 --> 01:22:14.940]  And he came back with six in a city with 500 policemen, nearly.
[01:22:14.940 --> 01:22:17.940]  That was a nice maneuver.
[01:22:17.940 --> 01:22:23.940]  It's very nice knowing that the policeman that gave me a ticket isn't on that list.
[01:22:23.940 --> 01:22:29.940]  That's why I asked that question, because I knew he had to pull a trick on him to get that out of him.
[01:22:29.940 --> 01:22:31.940]  That was a nice maneuver.
[01:22:31.940 --> 01:22:33.940]  Well, I hope it's very useful to everybody.
[01:22:33.940 --> 01:22:34.940]  That's about all I had.
[01:22:34.940 --> 01:22:35.940]  Thanks.
[01:22:35.940 --> 01:22:40.940]  Thanks for taking my call.
[01:22:40.940 --> 01:22:41.940]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:22:41.940 --> 01:22:42.940]  Appreciate it.
[01:22:42.940 --> 01:22:44.940]  All right, yes.
[01:22:44.940 --> 01:22:49.940]  I need to get that downloaded and get it up on our site so people can use it.
[01:22:49.940 --> 01:22:52.940]  That was, that's a nice play.
[01:22:52.940 --> 01:22:53.940]  Indeed.
[01:22:53.940 --> 01:22:54.940]  All right.
[01:22:54.940 --> 01:22:56.940]  We're going now to Michael in Maryland.
[01:22:56.940 --> 01:22:58.940]  Michael, thank you for calling in tonight.
[01:22:58.940 --> 01:23:00.940]  What's on your minds?
[01:23:00.940 --> 01:23:01.940]  Yeah, hi.
[01:23:01.940 --> 01:23:02.940]  I'm sorry.
[01:23:02.940 --> 01:23:04.940]  Just a follow-up.
[01:23:04.940 --> 01:23:07.940]  You may have mentioned this, trying to catch up with me.
[01:23:07.940 --> 01:23:12.940]  But I was interested to know whether there was ever any follow-up,
[01:23:12.940 --> 01:23:23.940]  follow-through with respect to the legislation that proposed for getting mistakes.
[01:23:23.940 --> 01:23:24.940]  You're cutting out real bad, Michael.
[01:23:24.940 --> 01:23:28.940]  Can you, like, move to another area of the building or outside or something?
[01:23:28.940 --> 01:23:34.940]  No, I took that.
[01:23:34.940 --> 01:23:36.940]  We can't hear you.
[01:23:36.940 --> 01:23:37.940]  Can or cannot?
[01:23:37.940 --> 01:23:39.940]  Cannot.
[01:23:39.940 --> 01:23:40.940]  Okay, all right, cool.
[01:23:40.940 --> 01:23:41.940]  Okay, yeah.
[01:23:41.940 --> 01:23:42.940]  Call back in.
[01:23:42.940 --> 01:23:43.940]  Call back.
[01:23:43.940 --> 01:23:50.940]  Thanks.
[01:23:50.940 --> 01:23:52.940]  Okay.
[01:23:52.940 --> 01:23:55.940]  The more I think about that, the better I like it.
[01:23:55.940 --> 01:24:02.940]  I've got three tickets in Austin, and I will definitely be filing that information request.
[01:24:02.940 --> 01:24:12.940]  It will be interesting to see how many police officers in Austin are authorized to enforce the traffic code.
[01:24:12.940 --> 01:24:15.940]  You got a guess, Eddie?
[01:24:15.940 --> 01:24:19.940]  Probably not near as many as they would like to think they have.
[01:24:19.940 --> 01:24:29.940]  They're thinking of the officers specifically detailed to commercial trucks.
[01:24:29.940 --> 01:24:34.940]  Well, they're thinking of an officer specifically detailed to traffic enforcement, period.
[01:24:34.940 --> 01:24:37.940]  But the problem they've got is the same.
[01:24:37.940 --> 01:24:40.940]  It doesn't matter that the department assigns him to the detail.
[01:24:40.940 --> 01:24:49.940]  If the Department of Public Safety has not duly trained and certified that officer, he has no authority to do the job.
[01:24:49.940 --> 01:24:53.940]  Yeah, I understand that, and the DPS...
[01:24:53.940 --> 01:24:55.940]  No, I know you understand it.
[01:24:55.940 --> 01:24:56.940]  I know you understand it.
[01:24:56.940 --> 01:24:59.940]  I just want the folks listening to understand it.
[01:24:59.940 --> 01:25:00.940]  Oh, okay.
[01:25:00.940 --> 01:25:02.940]  The DPS doesn't get the point.
[01:25:02.940 --> 01:25:07.940]  That's a good place to get the information we need.
[01:25:07.940 --> 01:25:09.940]  I like the idea.
[01:25:09.940 --> 01:25:19.940]  So now we build a stronger case, and I'm trying to get this case wrapped around him so that they don't have a way to walk out of it.
[01:25:19.940 --> 01:25:24.940]  Yeah, well, I'm perfectly willing to try to induce them into peeing in their own pool.
[01:25:24.940 --> 01:25:27.940]  That's fine by me.
[01:25:27.940 --> 01:25:34.940]  Yeah, we carry the blue dye.
[01:25:34.940 --> 01:25:42.940]  Okay, where are we on the motion you sent me last time?
[01:25:42.940 --> 01:25:44.940]  I hadn't had time to read it.
[01:25:44.940 --> 01:25:47.940]  I was trying to pull that up when we got started on the traffic issue.
[01:25:47.940 --> 01:25:49.940]  That's where I thought you were going to go to.
[01:25:49.940 --> 01:25:52.940]  No, well, that's where we are, Randy.
[01:25:52.940 --> 01:25:54.940]  We need you to read it.
[01:25:54.940 --> 01:25:59.940]  We can't have a discussion regarding it in any good detail unless you read it.
[01:25:59.940 --> 01:26:02.940]  Okay.
[01:26:02.940 --> 01:26:15.940]  I have basically taken every single statute I can find that relates to the ability of a city attorney to even attempt to act
[01:26:15.940 --> 01:26:30.940]  in behalf of the name of the state and shown conclusively that 95% of Texas law and the state Constitution say you cannot do that.
[01:26:30.940 --> 01:26:37.940]  That's exactly one of the issues that I've got from some of these folks that are writing me regarding trials in municipal courts.
[01:26:37.940 --> 01:26:45.940]  Folks, if you will take this motion and you will file it and you will stand on it and hammer it home,
[01:26:45.940 --> 01:26:51.940]  not only are you going to have an appealable issue above and beyond,
[01:26:51.940 --> 01:26:57.940]  but it will be an issue with which you can hang that attorney and that judge so far out to dry.
[01:26:57.940 --> 01:27:01.940]  You're never going to be able to see them get off the line.
[01:27:01.940 --> 01:27:11.940]  It's just not going to happen because they cannot get around what the law very specifically states and requires.
[01:27:11.940 --> 01:27:14.940]  Neither can our legislators.
[01:27:14.940 --> 01:27:21.940]  And our legislators have attempted to completely circumvent what the Constitution specifically states
[01:27:21.940 --> 01:27:29.940]  in authorizing a municipal court and municipal attorney to have prosecutorial authority over the people.
[01:27:29.940 --> 01:27:35.940]  They just simply can't do it.
[01:27:35.940 --> 01:27:38.940]  Okay, we've got Michael from Maryland back on the line.
[01:27:38.940 --> 01:27:39.940]  All right.
[01:27:39.940 --> 01:27:41.940]  Michael, thanks for calling back in.
[01:27:41.940 --> 01:27:42.940]  What is your question for us tonight?
[01:27:42.940 --> 01:27:43.940]  Yes, very briefly.
[01:27:43.940 --> 01:27:46.940]  This is mostly directed to Eddie, but anyone could answer.
[01:27:46.940 --> 01:27:50.940]  Some weeks ago, or I guess maybe a week and a half, two weeks ago,
[01:27:50.940 --> 01:28:00.940]  I believe the New Hampshire law was raised with respect to a very poignantly worded law or proposal resolution.
[01:28:00.940 --> 01:28:07.940]  And I subsequently found out that apparently it did not make it all the way through and kind of died midstream.
[01:28:07.940 --> 01:28:13.940]  So I was curious to know whether there was ever any follow-through on that one
[01:28:13.940 --> 01:28:16.940]  or whether there was an update, I guess, is what I'm asking.
[01:28:16.940 --> 01:28:21.940]  Right now, New Hampshire has not proceeded to do anything more with it,
[01:28:21.940 --> 01:28:31.940]  but the language has been picked up by several other states that are proposing legislation using the same information
[01:28:31.940 --> 01:28:32.940]  and features that this one has.
[01:28:32.940 --> 01:28:33.940]  Oh, great.
[01:28:33.940 --> 01:28:34.940]  Which one?
[01:28:34.940 --> 01:28:36.940]  I don't have a complete list yet.
[01:28:36.940 --> 01:28:37.940]  Oh, my.
[01:28:37.940 --> 01:28:40.940]  I know that Texas and Oklahoma is supposed to be two of them.
[01:28:40.940 --> 01:28:41.940]  Okay, Oklahoma.
[01:28:41.940 --> 01:28:42.940]  Okay.
[01:28:42.940 --> 01:28:46.940]  I know Texas for sure because I sent it in.
[01:28:46.940 --> 01:28:47.940]  Okay.
[01:28:47.940 --> 01:28:54.940]  But what they will actually do with it between now and the next time they meet, that's hard to say.
[01:28:54.940 --> 01:28:57.940]  They honestly believe that they can do what they want,
[01:28:57.940 --> 01:29:01.940]  and until we make sure we can do something bigger, badder, stronger, more effective,
[01:29:01.940 --> 01:29:03.940]  that's what they're going to continue to do,
[01:29:03.940 --> 01:29:09.940]  which is the entire reason that my brain went to work on this document that I was reading tonight.
[01:29:09.940 --> 01:29:12.940]  Okay, well, I'm going to have to go back and listen to the archives.
[01:29:12.940 --> 01:29:13.940]  I was busy up until the time I called in.
[01:29:13.940 --> 01:29:17.940]  Also, I guess the topic that you were talking about tonight had to do with the municipal matter
[01:29:17.940 --> 01:29:19.940]  that you just alluded to before I called back.
[01:29:19.940 --> 01:29:20.940]  Is that right?
[01:29:20.940 --> 01:29:21.940]  No.
[01:29:21.940 --> 01:29:27.940]  Actually, the main topic I had tonight was a lawsuit that I'm drawing up for the people to use
[01:29:27.940 --> 01:29:32.940]  to go directly after government officials for everything they do, basically.
[01:29:32.940 --> 01:29:33.940]  Great.
[01:29:33.940 --> 01:29:34.940]  Can't wait to listen to it.
[01:29:34.940 --> 01:29:35.940]  Thank you all so much for all you do.
[01:29:35.940 --> 01:29:36.940]  Okay, bye-bye.
[01:29:36.940 --> 01:29:37.940]  Yes, sir.
[01:29:37.940 --> 01:29:38.940]  All right, thank you.
[01:29:38.940 --> 01:29:40.940]  Okay, folks, we have open phone lines.
[01:29:40.940 --> 01:29:41.940]  We've got a half an hour left.
[01:29:41.940 --> 01:29:44.940]  512-646-1984.
[01:29:44.940 --> 01:29:47.940]  We'll be taking your calls for the rest of the show.
[01:29:47.940 --> 01:29:49.940]  We'll be right back.
[01:29:49.940 --> 01:30:17.940]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:17.940 --> 01:30:19.940]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:47.940 --> 01:30:54.940]  We'll be right back.
[01:31:17.940 --> 01:31:29.940]  We'll be right back.
[01:31:29.940 --> 01:31:51.940]  We'll be right back.
[01:31:51.940 --> 01:32:18.940]  Okay, folks, we're back.
[01:32:18.940 --> 01:32:23.940]  We'll be taking your calls, 512-646-1984.
[01:32:23.940 --> 01:32:26.940]  We've got Bill from Texas.
[01:32:26.940 --> 01:32:27.940]  Hey, Bill, thanks for calling in.
[01:32:27.940 --> 01:32:30.940]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:32:30.940 --> 01:32:32.940]  Oh, it's actually Dennis.
[01:32:32.940 --> 01:32:34.940]  Oh, okay, Dennis from Texas.
[01:32:34.940 --> 01:32:36.940]  Yes, same number, different person.
[01:32:36.940 --> 01:32:38.940]  Okay, what's on your mind tonight?
[01:32:38.940 --> 01:32:41.940]  Back, it was actually in December.
[01:32:41.940 --> 01:32:48.940]  I got a ticket from Austin PD for failure to maintain insurance.
[01:32:48.940 --> 01:32:55.940]  Now, I don't remember what the reasoning was, but I didn't show up to the court date.
[01:32:55.940 --> 01:33:03.940]  I don't remember why to dispute it, but now I've done a little bit more research,
[01:33:03.940 --> 01:33:09.940]  and I realize that it falls under transportation code, and that doesn't apply to me.
[01:33:09.940 --> 01:33:11.940]  I was engaged in commerce.
[01:33:11.940 --> 01:33:15.940]  I was just in my private vehicle, just traveling.
[01:33:15.940 --> 01:33:27.940]  Now that this date has passed, I'm just kind of wondering how I should go about taking care of it at this point.
[01:33:27.940 --> 01:33:32.940]  By taking care of it, I assume that you're referring to the warrant they've issued for you?
[01:33:32.940 --> 01:33:33.940]  Correct.
[01:33:33.940 --> 01:33:34.940]  Okay.
[01:33:34.940 --> 01:33:37.940]  Well, the first thing is up here.
[01:33:37.940 --> 01:33:38.940]  Okay.
[01:33:38.940 --> 01:33:44.940]  Just go in there and appear, and I'm not going to have to worry about getting arrested or anything like that?
[01:33:44.940 --> 01:33:45.940]  I did not say that.
[01:33:45.940 --> 01:33:48.940]  Okay.
[01:33:48.940 --> 01:33:55.940]  But the only way you're going to avoid possibly getting arrested is to make an appearance.
[01:33:55.940 --> 01:33:56.940]  Okay.
[01:33:56.940 --> 01:33:58.940]  Okay.
[01:33:58.940 --> 01:34:06.940]  But now the question actually becomes, you know, what do you intend to do about the ticket as well?
[01:34:06.940 --> 01:34:12.940]  One of the things that was just suggested and I cannot say is a bad thing to do is to get information requests
[01:34:12.940 --> 01:34:19.940]  and find out whether or not the officer that issued the citation was, in fact, authorized to enforce such statutes
[01:34:19.940 --> 01:34:27.940]  and to issue tickets under those statutes, because if he's not,
[01:34:27.940 --> 01:34:34.940]  then he's opened up a whole bigger can of worms than you don't have in insurance, and it all is on him.
[01:34:34.940 --> 01:34:37.940]  Okay.
[01:34:37.940 --> 01:34:43.940]  So that would probably be a lot easier than just trying to prove that transportation code doesn't actually apply to me.
[01:34:43.940 --> 01:34:53.940]  Well, yeah, but the deal is here is the first thing, folks, you need to understand is you very ever rarely
[01:34:53.940 --> 01:34:58.940]  have to go to the merits of the accusations against you,
[01:34:58.940 --> 01:35:08.940]  because they very ever rarely follow the law according to what they're supposed to do when they make such an accusation against you.
[01:35:08.940 --> 01:35:13.940]  And as the old saying goes, two wrongs don't make a right.
[01:35:13.940 --> 01:35:18.940]  So when they fail to follow the law to get you into court,
[01:35:18.940 --> 01:35:27.940]  then they don't have any authority to hold a charge over your head that they violated your rights and the law in order to create.
[01:35:27.940 --> 01:35:28.940]  Okay.
[01:35:28.940 --> 01:35:32.940]  That's another one of those simple axioms of logic, you know.
[01:35:32.940 --> 01:35:36.940]  You can't break a law to enforce a law.
[01:35:36.940 --> 01:35:38.940]  Okay.
[01:35:38.940 --> 01:35:39.940]  All right.
[01:35:39.940 --> 01:35:43.940]  So when you go down, can I say whether or not you will go to jail?
[01:35:43.940 --> 01:35:45.940]  No, I can't.
[01:35:45.940 --> 01:35:51.940]  Can I say whether or not the judge will say that you have to post a bond in order to not go to jail?
[01:35:51.940 --> 01:35:53.940]  No, I cannot.
[01:35:53.940 --> 01:35:58.940]  But whatever kind of deal you can work out while you're there,
[01:35:58.940 --> 01:36:08.940]  get your hands on copies of everything that's in your court folder and everything that's in the computer that is related to your case.
[01:36:08.940 --> 01:36:09.940]  Okay.
[01:36:09.940 --> 01:36:10.940]  Okay.
[01:36:10.940 --> 01:36:19.940]  Because the first thing you're going to want to do is verify that they did in fact do everything the law requires them to do.
[01:36:19.940 --> 01:36:27.940]  And I can almost guarantee you with 100% certainty it was not done.
[01:36:27.940 --> 01:36:28.940]  All right.
[01:36:28.940 --> 01:36:31.940]  That's good to know.
[01:36:31.940 --> 01:36:33.940]  So go ahead.
[01:36:33.940 --> 01:36:37.940]  Prove that they basically committed a crime,
[01:36:37.940 --> 01:36:46.940]  and it doesn't really at that point matter anymore about my ticket because they didn't have the authority to issue it in the first place.
[01:36:46.940 --> 01:36:47.940]  That's correct.
[01:36:47.940 --> 01:36:52.940]  And then we can worry about the argument,
[01:36:52.940 --> 01:37:00.940]  which is part of what we're doing with a lawsuit such as this that I've read tonight and plan on getting together,
[01:37:00.940 --> 01:37:09.940]  is where we go after them on the offensive instead of the defensive for attempting to replace our rights with privileges.
[01:37:09.940 --> 01:37:11.940]  All right.
[01:37:11.940 --> 01:37:20.940]  I think I may have sent you Eddie a letter already once saying that I kind of knew that already,
[01:37:20.940 --> 01:37:22.940]  that they didn't really have the authority to issue it.
[01:37:22.940 --> 01:37:26.940]  I'll send that again to you via email.
[01:37:26.940 --> 01:37:32.940]  Hopefully you might be able to help me with the logistics of that.
[01:37:32.940 --> 01:37:34.940]  Well, I'll see what I can do.
[01:37:34.940 --> 01:37:35.940]  I'd appreciate it.
[01:37:35.940 --> 01:37:36.940]  Okay.
[01:37:36.940 --> 01:37:37.940]  All right.
[01:37:36.940 --> 01:37:37.940]  Thank you very much.
[01:37:37.940 --> 01:37:38.940]  You're welcome.
[01:37:38.940 --> 01:37:39.940]  All right.
[01:37:38.940 --> 01:37:39.940]  Thanks, Bill.
[01:37:39.940 --> 01:37:42.940]  Okay, we're going now to Danny in Texas.
[01:37:42.940 --> 01:37:44.940]  Danny, thanks for calling in.
[01:37:44.940 --> 01:37:46.940]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:37:46.940 --> 01:37:47.940]  Well, a couple of different things.
[01:37:47.940 --> 01:37:51.940]  One is one about like void judgment.
[01:37:51.940 --> 01:37:58.940]  Okay, what court do you go to for getting a declaration of void judgment?
[01:37:58.940 --> 01:38:00.940]  Does any higher court?
[01:38:00.940 --> 01:38:07.940]  Well, are you going to get a judgment voided or is it a void judgment?
[01:38:07.940 --> 01:38:11.940]  Well, I would say it's a void judgment, you know,
[01:38:11.940 --> 01:38:16.940]  if you're supposed to be doing things under the Constitution.
[01:38:16.940 --> 01:38:22.940]  You'd apparently go to the court that you would appeal your issue from.
[01:38:22.940 --> 01:38:25.940]  If it's a class C misdemeanor, you go to the county.
[01:38:25.940 --> 01:38:29.940]  If it's anything else, you'd go to the Court of Appeals.
[01:38:29.940 --> 01:38:31.940]  Yeah, okay.
[01:38:31.940 --> 01:38:34.940]  And another question, are you talking about all those things
[01:38:34.940 --> 01:38:37.940]  and different things you hear around in places
[01:38:37.940 --> 01:38:42.940]  and some things I've listened to at other places
[01:38:42.940 --> 01:38:48.940]  that seem kind of consistent with the way that they go about doing things,
[01:38:48.940 --> 01:38:53.940]  and that is that everything is a contract type of thing.
[01:38:53.940 --> 01:38:58.940]  And, you know, if they were really doing some kind of litigation of a contract
[01:38:58.940 --> 01:39:03.940]  or something of that type, then maybe the city attorney could be in on that.
[01:39:03.940 --> 01:39:09.940]  It's just disguised so much as criminal that we don't recognize it.
[01:39:09.940 --> 01:39:15.940]  No, when they proceed with any document in which they present themselves
[01:39:15.940 --> 01:39:19.940]  as proceeding in the name of the state, that's not a contract.
[01:39:19.940 --> 01:39:26.940]  Nor are they authorized to represent the state in any such contract.
[01:39:26.940 --> 01:39:33.940]  Just that I've heard this one guy talking about the number thing now,
[01:39:33.940 --> 01:39:39.940]  he got somebody released from federal custody just by using this kind of technique,
[01:39:39.940 --> 01:39:43.940]  and when he stopped arguing the points and just agreed
[01:39:43.940 --> 01:39:49.940]  and how do I help you do this and how do I do that from here,
[01:39:49.940 --> 01:39:52.940]  well, they got released pretty quick.
[01:39:52.940 --> 01:39:57.940]  And, you know, it's like you're just continuing to negotiate, so you get offered something
[01:39:57.940 --> 01:39:59.940]  and you make a counteroffer.
[01:39:59.940 --> 01:40:03.940]  And I know somebody else locally here who has been doing something like that
[01:40:03.940 --> 01:40:07.940]  for someone else with a traffic ticket in the municipal court,
[01:40:07.940 --> 01:40:15.940]  and they keep wanting her to come in and they keep responding back with something else
[01:40:15.940 --> 01:40:19.940]  and, you know, declining their offer, but maybe offering something else,
[01:40:19.940 --> 01:40:22.940]  and they just keep talking and sending stuff.
[01:40:22.940 --> 01:40:27.940]  And the first time they find this individual out somewhere away from their house,
[01:40:27.940 --> 01:40:34.940]  they're going to jail because they don't care.
[01:40:34.940 --> 01:40:40.940]  The fact that they're avoiding whatever the thing is that the court
[01:40:40.940 --> 01:40:47.940]  and the police are attempting to do does not make them correct,
[01:40:47.940 --> 01:40:51.940]  nor does it protect them.
[01:40:51.940 --> 01:40:58.940]  Just because they don't come in doesn't mean that they will not do something with them if they catch them.
[01:40:58.940 --> 01:41:03.940]  So don't let that, you know, aspect of that escape you
[01:41:03.940 --> 01:41:08.940]  because that's exactly what's going to happen.
[01:41:08.940 --> 01:41:12.940]  Now, I agree that they attempt to do a lot of things that are not kosher,
[01:41:12.940 --> 01:41:18.940]  but they're stepping up and not in any way valid under our Constitution
[01:41:18.940 --> 01:41:20.940]  and the way it's supposed to work.
[01:41:20.940 --> 01:41:23.940]  So don't get me wrong in what I'm stating here.
[01:41:23.940 --> 01:41:28.940]  I'm simply telling you that if they're willing to commit fraud, aggravated perjury,
[01:41:28.940 --> 01:41:32.940]  aggravated assault, and all these other things for a few dollars,
[01:41:32.940 --> 01:41:36.940]  do not for one minute think they're going to let it stand in their way
[01:41:36.940 --> 01:41:42.940]  if they didn't agree to be arrested or to accept their offer.
[01:41:42.940 --> 01:41:45.940]  Let me enter an observation.
[01:41:45.940 --> 01:41:49.940]  We hear a lot of stuff like that where these guys are doing things,
[01:41:49.940 --> 01:41:53.940]  and so far it seems to be working.
[01:41:53.940 --> 01:41:57.940]  It's kind of like the guy that jumped off the 20-story building
[01:41:57.940 --> 01:42:03.940]  and was heard as he passed the 11th floor to say, so far so good.
[01:42:03.940 --> 01:42:07.940]  So when these people do these things and then the sky falls in on them,
[01:42:07.940 --> 01:42:10.940]  you never hear that part.
[01:42:10.940 --> 01:42:17.940]  You hear them talking about they're trying these unique and unusual maneuvers,
[01:42:17.940 --> 01:42:21.940]  and the courts haven't beat us up yet.
[01:42:21.940 --> 01:42:24.940]  But when the court does come and beat us up, beat them up,
[01:42:24.940 --> 01:42:26.940]  you don't hear them coming out and bragging about that
[01:42:26.940 --> 01:42:30.940]  and letting everybody know what happened to them as a result of them doing this.
[01:42:30.940 --> 01:42:36.940]  They just leave it out there like it's valid and valuable.
[01:42:36.940 --> 01:42:44.940]  I would really like to see these, how they end up,
[01:42:44.940 --> 01:42:49.940]  rather than just the fact that they used this to delay the court.
[01:42:49.940 --> 01:42:51.940]  Does that make sense, Danny?
[01:42:51.940 --> 01:42:53.940]  Yeah.
[01:42:53.940 --> 01:42:54.940]  That's one of my concerns.
[01:42:54.940 --> 01:42:59.940]  It does seem like a lot of things they let go on for like two to five years,
[01:42:59.940 --> 01:43:06.940]  to see who all would try it and then go jump everybody.
[01:43:06.940 --> 01:43:09.940]  Yeah, there's a few things out there that I'm worried about that happening now,
[01:43:09.940 --> 01:43:16.940]  but I always get uncomfortable when someone is trying something to quote
[01:43:16.940 --> 01:43:22.940]  the appellate guru at Travis County District Attorney's Office
[01:43:22.940 --> 01:43:29.940]  when he told me once I had a novel idea.
[01:43:29.940 --> 01:43:32.940]  My novel idea was,
[01:43:32.940 --> 01:43:36.940]  how do you arrest somebody when nobody ever made a criminal complaint against them?
[01:43:36.940 --> 01:43:38.940]  He thought that was novel.
[01:43:38.940 --> 01:43:40.940]  Yeah, well that was just statute.
[01:43:40.940 --> 01:43:43.940]  That wasn't really a novel idea.
[01:43:43.940 --> 01:43:48.940]  I know it wasn't, but he thought it was because they didn't do it that way.
[01:43:48.940 --> 01:43:50.940]  Okay, listen, we're going to break.
[01:43:50.940 --> 01:43:52.940]  Thanks for calling, Danny.
[01:43:52.940 --> 01:43:53.940]  Okay.
[01:43:53.940 --> 01:44:06.940]  Okay, we'll be right back with the rest of our callers.
[01:44:06.940 --> 01:44:11.940]  Aerial spray, chemtrails, the modified atmosphere,
[01:44:11.940 --> 01:44:18.940]  heavy metals and pesticides, carcinogens and chemical fibers all falling from the sky.
[01:44:18.940 --> 01:44:21.940]  It's your choice to keep your body clean.
[01:44:21.940 --> 01:44:30.940]  Detoxify with micro plant powder from hempusa.org or call 908-691-2608.
[01:44:30.940 --> 01:44:35.940]  It's odorless and tasteless and used in any liquid or food.
[01:44:35.940 --> 01:44:39.940]  Protect your family now with micro plant powder.
[01:44:39.940 --> 01:44:43.940]  Cleaning out heavy metals, parasites and toxins,
[01:44:43.940 --> 01:44:48.940]  stock it now for daily intake and stock it now for long-term storage.
[01:44:48.940 --> 01:45:07.940]  Visit hempusa.org or call 908-691-2608 today.
[01:45:07.940 --> 01:45:36.940]  All right, somebody's going to police the police, man.
[01:45:36.940 --> 01:45:37.940]  Somebody's going to bully the bully.
[01:45:37.940 --> 01:45:41.940]  That would be us and that would be you, listeners and callers.
[01:45:41.940 --> 01:45:43.940]  We're coming into the home stretch now.
[01:45:43.940 --> 01:45:44.940]  We've got one more segment left.
[01:45:44.940 --> 01:45:47.940]  We're going to John in Texas.
[01:45:47.940 --> 01:45:48.940]  John, thanks for calling in.
[01:45:48.940 --> 01:45:50.940]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:45:50.940 --> 01:45:53.940]  Well, thank you for taking my call.
[01:45:53.940 --> 01:46:03.940]  My question is, has anybody talked about Article 2.05 in the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure?
[01:46:03.940 --> 01:46:06.940]  Which part?
[01:46:06.940 --> 01:46:10.940]  Well, where it says in misdemeanor cases,
[01:46:10.940 --> 01:46:14.940]  the attorney shall forthwith prepare an information based on the complaint.
[01:46:14.940 --> 01:46:16.940]  Talked about it many, many times.
[01:46:16.940 --> 01:46:21.940]  They still like to insist in municipal courts and justice courts that it's not required.
[01:46:21.940 --> 01:46:26.940]  That's exactly what my motion for petition to show authority deals with.
[01:46:26.940 --> 01:46:33.940]  Okay, well, that was one many, many cases of doing that.
[01:46:33.940 --> 01:46:35.940]  And that wasn't the purpose of my call.
[01:46:35.940 --> 01:46:40.940]  I really only wanted one piece of information and that had to do with what are the best programs in your archives
[01:46:40.940 --> 01:46:46.940]  for learning more about the federal grand jury and that totally unrelated profile.
[01:46:46.940 --> 01:46:53.940]  But that's all I want to know is what are your best programs that I can listen to in your archives on the federal grand jury?
[01:46:53.940 --> 01:46:59.940]  Well, I would love to be able to tell you, unfortunately, I'm pretty much running a one-man show here.
[01:46:59.940 --> 01:47:00.940]  I produce all the shows.
[01:47:00.940 --> 01:47:03.940]  I, you know, have to keep everything updated.
[01:47:03.940 --> 01:47:04.940]  I do all the archives.
[01:47:04.940 --> 01:47:12.940]  And what I have done is I have set up the archive page as a WordPress page so that folks can log in
[01:47:12.940 --> 01:47:19.940]  and make comments to help me document the archives because I just don't have time to document the archives.
[01:47:19.940 --> 01:47:26.940]  And unfortunately, in a year and a half, I've gotten about five posts of people helping me document the archives.
[01:47:26.940 --> 01:47:32.940]  I do try to document the archives when I can, but, you know, I need folks like you, John,
[01:47:32.940 --> 01:47:39.940]  and other people to actually, you know, to help me with this radio network here because, you know,
[01:47:39.940 --> 01:47:47.940]  it is very time-consuming and I'm spending a lot of my time doing a lot of legal research on the FCC.
[01:47:47.940 --> 01:47:55.940]  And so I can't, I don't know at this point in time if I have anything documented concerning federal grand juries specifically,
[01:47:55.940 --> 01:48:00.940]  but you could just look back through the archives and see if there's something documented.
[01:48:00.940 --> 01:48:05.940]  I think the multi-grand jury programs were on the state grand juries.
[01:48:05.940 --> 01:48:11.940]  I remember we had Hoppe Heidelberg one time on talking about his experience with the federal grand jury
[01:48:11.940 --> 01:48:18.940]  and how he got railroaded basically during the grand jury investigation of the Oklahoma City bombing
[01:48:18.940 --> 01:48:21.940]  because he was wanting to subpoena witnesses and actually ask questions.
[01:48:21.940 --> 01:48:24.940]  And so basically the judge kicked him off.
[01:48:24.940 --> 01:48:26.940]  I remember that was a show on federal grand juries.
[01:48:26.940 --> 01:48:31.940]  That was kind of a railroading scheme that happened though.
[01:48:31.940 --> 01:48:34.940]  He was on the grand jury himself.
[01:48:34.940 --> 01:48:36.940]  Yes.
[01:48:36.940 --> 01:48:43.940]  We have talked about how to get to a federal grand jury and about the nature of the federal grand jury.
[01:48:43.940 --> 01:48:49.940]  You can look under, is it Williams v. US, the 1970 case?
[01:48:49.940 --> 01:48:55.940]  US v. Williams, actually US v. Williams is a 1992 case.
[01:48:55.940 --> 01:48:57.940]  Oh, that's right, 92 cases.
[01:48:57.940 --> 01:49:04.940]  Scalia did a really nice dissertation on the nature of grand juries.
[01:49:04.940 --> 01:49:07.940]  I don't remember the address off hands.
[01:49:07.940 --> 01:49:08.940]  I think I read that.
[01:49:08.940 --> 01:49:12.940]  Is that on your site?
[01:49:12.940 --> 01:49:13.940]  Probably.
[01:49:13.940 --> 01:49:20.940]  Just do an ixquick search, a start page search for US v. Williams grand jury, federal grand jury.
[01:49:20.940 --> 01:49:24.940]  There will be a lot of websites that have discussed it.
[01:49:24.940 --> 01:49:29.940]  Roger Roots talks about it on his website.
[01:49:29.940 --> 01:49:34.940]  What they won't tell you is how to get to one.
[01:49:34.940 --> 01:49:37.940]  Exactly.
[01:49:37.940 --> 01:49:47.940]  That's something we've talked about and that's something I'm working on is how to pry the US attorney out from in front of the grand jury.
[01:49:47.940 --> 01:49:56.940]  Exactly, because if you have exculpatory evidence that would exonerate you that's in the public record, how would you get that into the foreman's hands?
[01:49:56.940 --> 01:50:07.940]  The first thing to do is send it to the prosecuting attorney, demand that he give it to the grand jury because he has a statutory requirement to do that.
[01:50:07.940 --> 01:50:25.940]  Then put it in an envelope, send it to the US attorney's office, address to the foreman of the grand jury and put a letter in there to the foreman of the grand jury asking him to initial this letter and send it back to you so you'll know he received it.
[01:50:25.940 --> 01:50:31.940]  Ask him not to sign it as the US attorney has a stamp with his signature on it.
[01:50:31.940 --> 01:50:45.940]  And when you don't receive that back, then petition a district court for a writ of mandamus ordering the US attorney to present the exculpatory evidence to the grand jury.
[01:50:45.940 --> 01:51:02.940]  Whether he actually does or not, what it does is compromises his position so that if you then get it indicted, you can use that petition for mandamus to show that exculpatory evidence was in the hands of the US attorney and that he failed to present it.
[01:51:02.940 --> 01:51:08.940]  Then you can go after the US attorney for obstruction of justice, official oppression.
[01:51:08.940 --> 01:51:16.940]  We call in Friday night. Yeah, Friday night we'll have more time. I would like to go into that issue some more.
[01:51:16.940 --> 01:51:20.940]  We're going to run out of time here real quick tonight since it's the last segment.
[01:51:20.940 --> 01:51:28.940]  But Friday we will have a lot more time and it will take a while to go through all the ramifications of that and how to deal with it.
[01:51:28.940 --> 01:51:30.940]  Excellent. Thank you for taking my call.
[01:51:30.940 --> 01:51:32.940]  All right. Thank you, John.
[01:51:32.940 --> 01:51:36.940]  Okay, we're going to go now to Mike in Texas.
[01:51:36.940 --> 01:51:45.940]  Hello. I've been called in the past. I was the person that had a bottle of water passed through TSA.
[01:51:45.940 --> 01:51:49.940]  Oh, yes, yes.
[01:51:49.940 --> 01:52:01.940]  I had went to the Austin Police Department and requested an information request on the arresting officer and they wouldn't provide any information.
[01:52:01.940 --> 01:52:13.940]  I was wondering, is there maybe a more specific request or demand or a command that I must issue to acquire that information?
[01:52:13.940 --> 01:52:15.940]  I'd like, you know, following your...
[01:52:15.940 --> 01:52:18.940]  Wait, did you give them a written request?
[01:52:18.940 --> 01:52:20.940]  No.
[01:52:20.940 --> 01:52:23.940]  A verbal request means nothing.
[01:52:23.940 --> 01:52:24.940]  Okay.
[01:52:24.940 --> 01:52:30.940]  Follow the written request and if they don't respond to it, prepare criminal charges against Acevedo.
[01:52:30.940 --> 01:52:36.940]  Okay. File a written request in the form of a certified letter?
[01:52:36.940 --> 01:52:41.940]  Yes, you need to send it certified. Look on jurisimprudence.com.
[01:52:41.940 --> 01:52:43.940]  Okay.
[01:52:43.940 --> 01:52:47.940]  Top frog on the right, documents and research and then go to blanks.
[01:52:47.940 --> 01:52:48.940]  Okay.
[01:52:48.940 --> 01:52:51.940]  And in there I'll have an information, blank information request.
[01:52:51.940 --> 01:52:54.940]  Okay. I'm sorry.
[01:52:54.940 --> 01:52:55.940]  Oh, I'm sorry.
[01:52:55.940 --> 01:52:59.940]  No, I was going to say they'll probably recognize the format.
[01:52:59.940 --> 01:53:00.940]  Okay.
[01:53:00.940 --> 01:53:09.940]  And it might encourage them to respond to it, but if they don't, you give them their 15 days and then you just file criminal charges against them.
[01:53:09.940 --> 01:53:10.940]  Okay.
[01:53:10.940 --> 01:53:12.940]  Just start making a nuisance of yourself.
[01:53:12.940 --> 01:53:23.940]  Go down to old Herb Evans, the justice of the peace in the courthouse, in the old courthouse, just as you come in the door and go through the metal detector that's right to your left.
[01:53:23.940 --> 01:53:28.940]  Go in there and give them to him and ask him to have Acevedo arrested.
[01:53:28.940 --> 01:53:34.940]  Well, he won't do that, but he'll call Acevedo and say, I've got a guy out here trying to get me arrested.
[01:53:34.940 --> 01:53:38.940]  And then you begin to get their attention.
[01:53:38.940 --> 01:53:44.940]  We're sovereigns. We can do that sort of thing.
[01:53:44.940 --> 01:53:52.940]  Regarding Texas criminal law, I have on order, I have O'Connor's Texas criminal code on order.
[01:53:52.940 --> 01:53:54.940]  It should arrive in a few days.
[01:53:54.940 --> 01:54:08.940]  But I was wondering in the interim of that, what was the Texas law that required that municipal ordinances were not, I forget the legal term.
[01:54:08.940 --> 01:54:10.940]  Ordinances are not law.
[01:54:10.940 --> 01:54:13.940]  Texas Constitution, Article 3, Section 29.
[01:54:13.940 --> 01:54:14.940]  Could you repeat that, sir?
[01:54:14.940 --> 01:54:15.940]  I'm sorry.
[01:54:15.940 --> 01:54:20.940]  Texas Constitution, Article 3, Section 29, the enacting clause.
[01:54:20.940 --> 01:54:26.940]  All laws shall have the following enacting clause, be it enacted by the legislature of the state of Texas.
[01:54:26.940 --> 01:54:35.940]  An ordinance does not have that enacting clause, nor is it enacted by the legislature as required in that article of the Texas Constitution.
[01:54:35.940 --> 01:54:42.940]  Therefore, city and county ordinances cannot and are not law, binding upon the people of Texas.
[01:54:42.940 --> 01:54:43.940]  Okay.
[01:54:43.940 --> 01:54:51.940]  I asked an attorney today, I went through the Travis County Legal Referral Service, and I spoke with the attorney.
[01:54:51.940 --> 01:54:56.940]  And I brought that topic up, and she said, well, it's not true.
[01:54:56.940 --> 01:55:00.940]  Municipal courts give authority.
[01:55:00.940 --> 01:55:02.940]  But I think you guys are familiar.
[01:55:02.940 --> 01:55:06.940]  Did you ask the attorney, where did they get the authority?
[01:55:06.940 --> 01:55:09.940]  No, I didn't ask that.
[01:55:09.940 --> 01:55:15.940]  When you ask that, then you'll get the, well, they just got it.
[01:55:15.940 --> 01:55:17.940]  Yeah.
[01:55:17.940 --> 01:55:20.940]  I think that was sort of the impression that I got.
[01:55:20.940 --> 01:55:23.940]  They just operate on their own.
[01:55:23.940 --> 01:55:33.940]  Yeah, they believe that just by telling you something, it makes it so, and it doesn't.
[01:55:33.940 --> 01:55:39.940]  I think I'm just going to work on this piecemeal, and probably I don't want to take up too much time.
[01:55:39.940 --> 01:55:44.940]  But I do appreciate all the help.
[01:55:44.940 --> 01:55:48.940]  Yeah, I'm just going to probably first.
[01:55:48.940 --> 01:55:56.940]  I was wondering also last, so when I wanted to file a motion for discovery, I filed it with the clerk or the attorney.
[01:55:56.940 --> 01:55:57.940]  Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:55:57.940 --> 01:56:00.940]  Do you have a case ongoing?
[01:56:00.940 --> 01:56:02.940]  No, not yet.
[01:56:02.940 --> 01:56:04.940]  Okay, then you have no right to discovery.
[01:56:04.940 --> 01:56:06.940]  Then you use open records.
[01:56:06.940 --> 01:56:08.940]  Okay.
[01:56:08.940 --> 01:56:10.940]  You can just file your open record request.
[01:56:10.940 --> 01:56:12.940]  Always make it in writing, though.
[01:56:12.940 --> 01:56:16.940]  This would be open records request with Bergstrom Airport.
[01:56:16.940 --> 01:56:18.940]  Oh, yeah, anything other than court records.
[01:56:18.940 --> 01:56:25.940]  You can generally, the blank request I have is blank in that it requests it under open records
[01:56:25.940 --> 01:56:31.940]  or under the right to public courts or any relevance to law.
[01:56:31.940 --> 01:56:36.940]  So they don't get to do a song and dance and say this is not public records.
[01:56:36.940 --> 01:56:39.940]  It's court records, and you didn't ask the right question.
[01:56:39.940 --> 01:56:47.940]  Mine covers both, so you can use that one request for any of them.
[01:56:47.940 --> 01:56:50.940]  I was going quickly because we're kind of out of time, and we've got one more caller.
[01:56:50.940 --> 01:56:51.940]  Okay, I'll let you go.
[01:56:51.940 --> 01:56:52.940]  I'm sorry.
[01:56:52.940 --> 01:56:53.940]  I'll let you guys go.
[01:56:53.940 --> 01:56:54.940]  Thank you very much for the help.
[01:56:54.940 --> 01:56:55.940]  Thank you.
[01:56:55.940 --> 01:56:57.940]  Okay, thank you, Mike.
[01:56:57.940 --> 01:56:59.940]  All right, we've got a little less than two minutes left.
[01:56:59.940 --> 01:57:02.940]  Ken from Texas, what's on your mind, quickly?
[01:57:02.940 --> 01:57:04.940]  Hi, I'm real fast.
[01:57:04.940 --> 01:57:07.940]  Deborah, I'm unable to find the login button on the Web site.
[01:57:07.940 --> 01:57:10.940]  I'd like to go through the archives and comment about them to help you.
[01:57:10.940 --> 01:57:12.940]  I can't log in there.
[01:57:12.940 --> 01:57:15.940]  Okay, well, you just go to the archive page,
[01:57:15.940 --> 01:57:17.940]  and you'll see where there's a place to sign up.
[01:57:17.940 --> 01:57:18.940]  It's a WordPress page.
[01:57:18.940 --> 01:57:20.940]  Okay, I'll look again.
[01:57:20.940 --> 01:57:23.940]  Yeah, the login is not on the Web site.
[01:57:23.940 --> 01:57:24.940]  You have to go to the archive page.
[01:57:24.940 --> 01:57:25.940]  It's a WordPress page.
[01:57:25.940 --> 01:57:26.940]  Okay, I'll look again.
[01:57:26.940 --> 01:57:27.940]  Okay, great.
[01:57:27.940 --> 01:57:33.940]  Also, briefly, maybe Eddie and Randy could tell me, or for listeners,
[01:57:33.940 --> 01:57:37.940]  the difference between an examining trial versus a pretrial hearing,
[01:57:37.940 --> 01:57:40.940]  because I went to a pretrial hearing this past week,
[01:57:40.940 --> 01:57:45.940]  and the judge, when I complained to him about I was messed around
[01:57:45.940 --> 01:57:51.940]  and didn't get an examining trial, he said, well, were you denied a pretrial hearing?
[01:57:51.940 --> 01:57:54.940]  I said, no, and he seemed to think these were identical.
[01:57:54.940 --> 01:57:57.940]  I wanted to see if he could say anything about that.
[01:57:57.940 --> 01:57:58.940]  I'll just hang up now and listen.
[01:57:58.940 --> 01:58:00.940]  Thanks.
[01:58:00.940 --> 01:58:06.940]  A pretrial hearing, the only one is a hearing for the purposes of hearing motions.
[01:58:06.940 --> 01:58:12.940]  An examining trial is defined by a whole chapter, Chapter 16.
[01:58:12.940 --> 01:58:18.940]  It's examining to the sufficiency of the allegation, and they never do that.
[01:58:18.940 --> 01:58:25.940]  So read my real habeas corpus, it goes real specific on what an examining trial is
[01:58:25.940 --> 01:58:28.940]  and what has to be done.
[01:58:28.940 --> 01:58:29.940]  And then there's an arraignment,
[01:58:29.940 --> 01:58:32.940]  an arraignment for the purposes of determining the identity of the accused
[01:58:32.940 --> 01:58:35.940]  and taking a plea, and that's all.
[01:58:35.940 --> 01:58:39.940]  So any other pretrial is for the purpose of hearing motions,
[01:58:39.940 --> 01:58:42.940]  and the judge knew that.
[01:58:42.940 --> 01:58:46.940]  Okay, we are about out of time.
[01:58:46.940 --> 01:58:50.940]  This is Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Eddie Craig,
[01:58:50.940 --> 01:58:54.940]  Little Law Radio, tune back in Thursday.
[01:58:54.940 --> 01:58:58.940]  And don't forget One Love Kitchen.
[01:58:58.940 --> 01:59:26.940]  Thank you.
[01:59:26.940 --> 01:59:34.940]  I'm like a stepping razor, don't watch my side, I'm dangerous, I'm dangerous.
[01:59:34.940 --> 01:59:41.940]  I'm like a chopping razor, don't watch my side, I'm dangerous, dangerous.
[01:59:41.940 --> 01:59:56.940]  I'm like a chopping razor, don't watch my side.