ROL_2009-03-13_16k_Hr3-4.timecode

[00:00.000 --> 00:05.280]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[00:05.280 --> 00:10.760]  The Federal Reserve said Thursday the wealth of American families plunged 18 percent in
[00:10.760 --> 00:15.040]  2008, totaling 11 trillion dollars.
[00:15.040 --> 00:19.880]  According to the Wall Street Journal's latest poll, 40 percent of 49 economists thought
[00:19.880 --> 00:25.400]  a second large stimulus package is necessary to jumpstart the economy.
[00:25.400 --> 00:30.560]  With the disgraced financier Bernie Madoff now behind bars, attention has turned to whether
[00:30.560 --> 00:34.880]  others were involved in his $65 billion fraud.
[00:34.880 --> 00:43.960]  Madoff is in federal prison, awaiting sentencing in June.
[00:43.960 --> 00:49.240]  Critics charge insurance behemoth AIG was king of credit default swaps.
[00:49.240 --> 00:54.960]  AIG found if the word insurance wasn't uttered, there was no need to set aside reserves in
[00:54.960 --> 00:55.960]  case of loss.
[00:55.960 --> 01:01.360]  And if there were no reserves to set aside, AIG found it could issue all the credit swaps
[01:01.360 --> 01:05.280]  the market could bear, namely about $400 billion.
[01:05.280 --> 01:10.920]  AIG was then able to cash in the policy premiums as a huge supplement to its normal insurance
[01:10.920 --> 01:15.440]  business, allowing it to pay fat salaries and bonuses.
[01:15.440 --> 01:19.120]  When the company crashed, it asked to be rescued by the taxpayer.
[01:19.120 --> 01:25.520]  Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said, quote, AIG exploited a huge gap in the regulatory system.
[01:25.520 --> 01:30.920]  There was no oversight of the financial products division, adding this was a hedge fund basically
[01:30.920 --> 01:36.640]  attached to a large and stable insurance company that made huge numbers of irresponsible bets
[01:36.640 --> 01:45.040]  and took huge losses.
[01:45.040 --> 01:49.520]  Every business giant Monsanto is trying to keep people from buying, collecting, and saving
[01:49.520 --> 01:51.360]  normal seeds.
[01:51.360 --> 01:57.120]  Environmental activist Lynn Cohen Cole writes, Monsanto is now buying up seed companies across
[01:57.120 --> 01:59.000]  the Midwest.
[01:59.000 --> 02:03.680]  Monsanto has also written seed laws and gotten legislators to enact them.
[02:03.680 --> 02:09.520]  This new legislation makes cleaning, collecting, and storing of seeds so onerous in terms of
[02:09.520 --> 02:16.120]  fees, paperwork, testing, and tracking that normal seed collecting becomes almost impossible.
[02:16.120 --> 02:21.920]  Monsanto written laws remove community control over their own counties so farmers and citizens
[02:21.920 --> 02:27.840]  can't block the planting of genetically modified crops even if they contaminate other crops.
[02:27.840 --> 02:34.280]  Cohen Cole reports, Monsanto written FDA regulations even make a farmer's seed cleaning equipment
[02:34.280 --> 02:35.280]  illegal.
[02:35.280 --> 02:42.760]  Dr. Vandana Shiva, a leading anti-Monsanto activist, says Monsanto has sued 1,500 farmers
[02:42.760 --> 02:46.320]  whose fields have been contaminated by GM crops.
[02:46.320 --> 03:03.760]  Shiva has gotten millions of farmers to sign a pledge to break Monsanto written laws.
[03:03.760 --> 03:21.840]  He says Monsanto is now trying to keep people from buying, collecting, and saving normal
[03:21.840 --> 03:22.840]  seeds.
[03:22.840 --> 03:41.840]  He says Monsanto is now trying to keep people from buying, collecting, and saving normal
[03:41.840 --> 03:42.840]  seeds.
[03:42.840 --> 04:00.200]  He says Monsanto is now trying to keep people from buying, collecting, and saving normal
[04:00.200 --> 04:01.200]  seeds.
[04:01.200 --> 04:12.200]  He says Monsanto is now trying to keep people from buying, collecting, and saving normal
[04:12.200 --> 04:13.440]  seeds.
[04:13.440 --> 04:28.080]  He says Monsanto is now trying to keep people from buying, collecting, and saving normal
[04:28.080 --> 04:29.080]  seeds.
[04:29.080 --> 04:39.960]  He says Monsanto is now trying to keep people from buying, collecting, and saving normal
[04:39.960 --> 04:40.960]  seeds.
[04:40.960 --> 05:09.680]  All right, we are back.
[05:09.680 --> 05:20.840]  The rule of law, Randy Kelton and Debra Stevens.
[05:20.840 --> 05:28.080]  Chip in the morning, chip in the evening, that's some three shoes posse for you.
[05:28.080 --> 05:30.480]  And Dr. Catherine Albrecht knows about that.
[05:30.480 --> 05:33.560]  She was just here a couple of weeks ago.
[05:33.560 --> 05:40.400]  She was actually on Agenda 21 earlier talking about the RFID situation and folks do not
[05:40.400 --> 05:48.720]  forget the protest at IDENTICS right here in Round Rock this coming Monday.
[05:48.720 --> 05:53.680]  We got a protest against the vendors who are doing this too and let them know that we don't
[05:53.680 --> 05:56.600]  appreciate their business very much.
[05:56.600 --> 05:57.600]  Right Randy?
[05:57.600 --> 05:58.600]  Right.
[05:58.600 --> 05:59.600]  Okay.
[05:59.600 --> 06:03.640]  So now we are going to go to some callers, we've got Eddie from Texas.
[06:03.640 --> 06:04.640]  Hey Eddie, thanks for calling in.
[06:04.640 --> 06:05.640]  What's on your mind tonight?
[06:05.640 --> 06:06.640]  Hi Debra.
[06:06.640 --> 06:07.640]  Hi Randy.
[06:07.640 --> 06:08.640]  How are y'all?
[06:08.640 --> 06:09.640]  Good.
[06:09.640 --> 06:12.280]  I appreciate the work you are doing and I just want to let you know I've sent you guys
[06:12.280 --> 06:16.520]  a couple of emails to your rule of law address that has got some interesting information
[06:16.520 --> 06:17.520]  in it.
[06:17.520 --> 06:18.520]  All right, great.
[06:18.520 --> 06:23.520]  I'm putting two links to newspaper articles here in Nacogdoches where I am located.
[06:23.520 --> 06:26.960]  Randy, you are talking about how to get a case before the grand jury.
[06:26.960 --> 06:32.040]  I'd like to read you one of the small paragraphs out of this article from our district attorney
[06:32.040 --> 06:37.200]  here when I told the reporter that I was going to directly submit criminal charges against
[06:37.200 --> 06:39.960]  these comptroller officials to the grand jury.
[06:39.960 --> 06:45.480]  This is what our new DA here said directly to the paper.
[06:45.480 --> 06:49.720]  Actually filing charges against the officials so he can confront them point by point in
[06:49.720 --> 06:52.720]  court may be more difficult than he would like.
[06:52.720 --> 06:56.920]  Craig says he has the right to file criminal charges on his own, but Nacogdoches district
[06:56.920 --> 07:01.840]  attorney Nicole Ostraco said he does not have the right to bring a case before the grand
[07:01.840 --> 07:03.600]  jury as he claims.
[07:03.600 --> 07:07.600]  He has the right to file a criminal charge with any law enforcement agency that will
[07:07.600 --> 07:12.840]  take the case, but the only way cases get to grand jury from this office is that I choose
[07:12.840 --> 07:16.520]  to send them to grand jury, Ostraco said.
[07:16.520 --> 07:21.200]  Occasionally a grand jury may also choose to investigate on its own, but you can't just
[07:21.200 --> 07:25.600]  show up on Friday morning of grand jury day and push your way into the room and present
[07:25.600 --> 07:27.520]  a case to them, she said.
[07:27.520 --> 07:32.640]  Now this is our new DA who is supposed to be knowledgeable in the law, but obviously
[07:32.640 --> 07:38.720]  has never bothered to read 20.09 and several other sections of the law, including 38.05.
[07:38.720 --> 07:41.720]  Right, and 2.03.
[07:41.720 --> 07:47.080]  Correct, and 3.05.
[07:47.080 --> 07:50.520]  What you need to do is introduce her to it.
[07:50.520 --> 07:55.680]  Oh, I'm going to, I sent you copies of the criminal complaints I have started writing
[07:55.680 --> 07:58.520]  against her as well as the comptroller officials.
[07:58.520 --> 08:03.680]  Here's the situation this story was written about, I've been researching the state sales
[08:03.680 --> 08:09.160]  tax here in Texas and I can prove using their own tax code that they are charging and collecting
[08:09.160 --> 08:13.520]  the-
[08:13.520 --> 08:14.520]  Are you there, Eddie?
[08:14.520 --> 08:16.960]  I don't know what that was.
[08:16.960 --> 08:18.320]  Okay, are you there?
[08:18.320 --> 08:21.680]  Yeah, I'm here, it sounds like a wind attack.
[08:21.680 --> 08:25.560]  Is there a black helicopter or is there a helicopter up above you that you can't see?
[08:25.560 --> 08:29.320]  Well, they'll probably come looking for me soon, I'll tell you.
[08:29.320 --> 08:35.120]  Okay, so go ahead, you found looking at their own tax code that what is happening?
[08:35.120 --> 08:41.520]  They are having businesses in Texas legally charge and collect tax.
[08:41.520 --> 08:46.920]  The sales tax is very, very specific in what it says it applies to.
[08:46.920 --> 08:54.400]  The definition of tax is any legal entity, Randy, we know what those are, right?
[08:54.400 --> 08:55.400]  They're not people.
[08:55.400 --> 08:56.400]  Right.
[08:56.400 --> 09:03.640]  Okay, any legal entity that is operating in multiple states in this state, now we'll get
[09:03.640 --> 09:07.600]  to in this state here in just a second, it is also defined within the tax code and has
[09:07.600 --> 09:10.120]  a very specific meaning.
[09:10.120 --> 09:17.280]  A tax, according to the tax code, is a tax that has multi-state act.
[09:17.280 --> 09:24.360]  Now the term within state by definition is any territory within the exterior limits of
[09:24.360 --> 09:29.180]  Texas that have been seized by the United States.
[09:29.180 --> 09:34.320]  What can that possibly be if it's not military installations, federal buildings, dock, shipyard,
[09:34.320 --> 09:37.480]  post offices and other federal territory?
[09:37.480 --> 09:38.480]  Right.
[09:38.480 --> 09:39.480]  Okay.
[09:39.480 --> 09:46.560]  So, by those definitions alone and the way the tax code is implemented in Chapter 151
[09:46.560 --> 09:55.200]  of the tax code, that's where the tax is imposed, which these definitions exist in 141 and 151.
[09:55.200 --> 09:59.800]  And based upon that and a few other things that go with it, by the way, in the paperwork
[09:59.800 --> 10:06.680]  that I sent to you guys through those emails, the tax can only be collected by legal entity
[10:06.680 --> 10:13.600]  that operates in multiple states and on property that is owned or controlled by the federal,
[10:13.600 --> 10:18.680]  which basically knocked every business out of Texas, not on a military base or a dockyard
[10:18.680 --> 10:20.800]  or a shipyard or a post office.
[10:20.800 --> 10:26.800]  Hey, Eddie, Eddie, listen, you're kind of phasing in and out.
[10:26.800 --> 10:30.480]  I'm sorry, I've got half a dozen computers in here hooked up to you guys streaming you,
[10:30.480 --> 10:32.480]  so you all get your numbers up.
[10:32.480 --> 10:33.480]  Okay.
[10:33.480 --> 10:34.480]  Oh, isn't that sweet.
[10:34.480 --> 10:35.480]  Thank you.
[10:35.480 --> 10:41.920]  No, no, it's just your voice, it's like it's kind of phasing in and out.
[10:41.920 --> 10:42.920]  Are you on a cell phone?
[10:42.920 --> 10:43.920]  Yes, I am actually.
[10:43.920 --> 10:44.920]  Okay.
[10:44.920 --> 10:45.920]  All right.
[10:45.920 --> 10:50.920]  It's been a fear from the computer because I have so many of them in here that you guys
[10:50.920 --> 10:53.920]  are going out on.
[10:53.920 --> 10:56.920]  Can you step into another room?
[10:56.920 --> 11:00.280]  Actually I was walking toward the back and I'm back up front now where it should be a
[11:00.280 --> 11:01.280]  lot better.
[11:01.280 --> 11:02.280]  Okay.
[11:02.280 --> 11:03.280]  All right.
[11:03.280 --> 11:04.280]  Great.
[11:04.280 --> 11:05.280]  All right.
[11:05.280 --> 11:10.720]  So, you know, it's easily provable by their own statutes, sales tax can only be collected
[11:10.720 --> 11:17.360]  by specific legal entities when they are operating in multiple states on specific pieces of property.
[11:17.360 --> 11:20.960]  No one else by law can collect it.
[11:20.960 --> 11:24.000]  If we do that, we can fraud against the consumer.
[11:24.000 --> 11:29.120]  We're charging them a tax they do not owe.
[11:29.120 --> 11:30.120]  And so...
[11:30.120 --> 11:37.040]  But you can sue them personally, it violates their contract with the state.
[11:37.040 --> 11:40.240]  I'm going to charge them the tax illegally.
[11:40.240 --> 11:44.240]  Wait, I'm losing you.
[11:44.240 --> 11:45.240]  Can you try calling back in?
[11:45.240 --> 11:48.480]  Yes, just try calling back in and reestablishing the connection, Eddie.
[11:48.480 --> 11:51.000]  Is this any better?
[11:51.000 --> 11:53.800]  No, you're still breaking up.
[11:53.800 --> 11:54.800]  Yes, call back in.
[11:54.800 --> 11:55.800]  Okay.
[11:55.800 --> 11:56.800]  I'll call you back.
[11:56.800 --> 11:57.800]  All right.
[11:57.800 --> 11:59.840]  Eddie is going to call back in.
[11:59.840 --> 12:00.840]  All right.
[12:00.840 --> 12:04.920]  Before we move on to other callers, let's just give Eddie a chance to call back in here
[12:04.920 --> 12:10.440]  because I want to make sure that he gets a chance to make his point about this apparent
[12:10.440 --> 12:11.440]  tax fraud.
[12:11.440 --> 12:13.280]  Randy, what are your comments on this?
[12:13.280 --> 12:17.040]  That is really interesting stuff.
[12:17.040 --> 12:23.680]  If what he says bears out, we could have a lot of fun with that.
[12:23.680 --> 12:33.120]  I mean, if they're collecting a tax that's in violation of the code, in clear violation
[12:33.120 --> 12:40.880]  of the code, we can go after the officials themselves personally.
[12:40.880 --> 12:42.960]  We could go after the state comptroller.
[12:42.960 --> 12:46.920]  Oh, that would be...
[12:46.920 --> 12:48.840]  We could go after the state comptroller, Randy.
[12:48.840 --> 12:49.840]  What do you think?
[12:49.840 --> 12:50.840]  That's a pretty big fish.
[12:50.840 --> 12:56.120]  Well, as long as I don't have to go back to the secretary of state's building.
[12:56.120 --> 12:59.560]  Well, I'm not sure where the state comptroller's office is.
[12:59.560 --> 13:04.200]  It may be in the same building.
[13:04.200 --> 13:08.080]  Last time got a little intense.
[13:08.080 --> 13:10.080]  I want to avoid any more of that if I can help.
[13:10.080 --> 13:12.200]  He ruined my best suit.
[13:12.200 --> 13:13.200]  He ruined your suit?
[13:13.200 --> 13:14.200]  Yes, he did.
[13:14.200 --> 13:18.400]  Well, what, by scraping it up against the wall or something?
[13:18.400 --> 13:22.000]  He slammed me into the wall so hard.
[13:22.000 --> 13:23.280]  It ripped your suit?
[13:23.280 --> 13:24.840]  It crushed holes in it.
[13:24.840 --> 13:25.840]  Oh my God.
[13:25.840 --> 13:30.200]  And it crushed my cell phone through the pocket of my shirt.
[13:30.200 --> 13:31.200]  Yikes.
[13:31.200 --> 13:33.840]  He was pretty ticked.
[13:33.840 --> 13:38.080]  Well, it seems like you should be able to get damages for that.
[13:38.080 --> 13:41.600]  Oh, I'll get a lot more than just that suit.
[13:41.600 --> 13:42.600]  But I hate it.
[13:42.600 --> 13:44.600]  That was one of my favorite suits.
[13:44.600 --> 13:52.600]  Randy, you're going to have to start getting some kind of other suits that are disposable
[13:52.600 --> 13:57.560]  somehow when you go to do these things so that when they get trashed from you getting
[13:57.560 --> 14:01.400]  the crap eaten out of you, at least it won't ruin your good suit.
[14:01.400 --> 14:04.760]  Well, the problem is it's hard to predict when they're going to beat the crap out of
[14:04.760 --> 14:05.760]  you.
[14:05.760 --> 14:10.880]  It seems to kind of come when you least expect it.
[14:10.880 --> 14:13.000]  Just expect it to happen every time, Randy.
[14:13.000 --> 14:14.000]  This guy was a sergeant.
[14:14.000 --> 14:22.040]  You know, I'd expect it from one of the street level flunkies, but this guy was higher up.
[14:22.040 --> 14:23.600]  And I did have something.
[14:23.600 --> 14:30.240]  I talked to the major, Major Remy, and Major Remy looked over.
[14:30.240 --> 14:35.560]  He's familiar with this case and he's looked it over and he's decided that all of his officers
[14:35.560 --> 14:36.560]  acted appropriately.
[14:36.560 --> 14:37.560]  Goodie.
[14:37.560 --> 14:43.720]  Well, so he just accepted responsibility then.
[14:43.720 --> 14:55.240]  Respondent Superior, I had him on tape, he admitted that these officers acted in accordance
[14:55.240 --> 14:56.240]  with policy.
[14:56.240 --> 14:57.240]  Gotcha, Bubba.
[14:57.240 --> 14:58.240]  Eddie's taking a while.
[14:58.240 --> 15:04.760]  Let's take our next caller and then we'll pick up Eddie as soon as we get done.
[15:04.760 --> 15:05.760]  Okay.
[15:05.760 --> 15:06.760]  All right.
[15:06.760 --> 15:07.760]  Let's go to Julio in Texas.
[15:07.760 --> 15:08.760]  Hey, Julio.
[15:08.760 --> 15:09.760]  Thanks for calling in.
[15:09.760 --> 15:10.760]  What's on your mind?
[15:10.760 --> 15:18.640]  Well, I just want to talk briefly about the duties of the magistrate that we're all talking
[15:18.640 --> 15:19.640]  about.
[15:19.640 --> 15:20.640]  Okay.
[15:20.640 --> 15:27.680]  And if an arrest is ruled without a warrant, you just want to arrest it.
[15:27.680 --> 15:35.240]  The magistrate must conduct a probable cross hearing, either by sworn testimony or written
[15:35.240 --> 15:42.480]  off with David to review the facts and circumstances of the arrest to determine probable cause.
[15:42.480 --> 15:43.480]  Wait a minute.
[15:43.480 --> 15:44.480]  Wait a minute.
[15:44.480 --> 15:45.480]  No.
[15:45.480 --> 15:46.480]  That's not exactly true.
[15:46.480 --> 15:53.160]  Well, that's according to the county rules fibers of McLaughlin.
[15:53.160 --> 16:02.080]  Well, they stated it somewhat slightly wrong in an examining trial.
[16:02.080 --> 16:07.600]  But he can't go by written, just written documentation.
[16:07.600 --> 16:11.560]  He has to have, you get to be faced by your accuser.
[16:11.560 --> 16:12.560]  I understand that.
[16:12.560 --> 16:21.640]  I'm looking at what is called, okay, let me see down here, it's called the judge's handbook.
[16:21.640 --> 16:22.640]  Yeah.
[16:22.640 --> 16:29.440]  They've got their own little handbook, but in a way, because it is by law, but the handbook,
[16:29.440 --> 16:31.440]  they're not doing it.
[16:31.440 --> 16:38.680]  And that was really a minor point I was making there, is just that implying that they can
[16:38.680 --> 16:44.040]  do this just from reading documentation and no, they can't, they're not doing anything
[16:44.040 --> 16:46.040]  that's even in their own handbook.
[16:46.040 --> 16:47.040]  Okay.
[16:47.040 --> 16:48.040]  All right.
[16:48.040 --> 16:49.040]  Listen, Julio, hang on the line.
[16:49.040 --> 16:50.040]  We're going to break now.
[16:50.040 --> 16:51.040]  We'll be right back.
[16:51.040 --> 16:56.760]  This is the Rule of Law, Raina Kelton and Deborah Stevens on Rule of Law Radio.
[16:56.760 --> 17:05.280]  Are you looking for an investment that has no stock market risk, has a 100% track record
[17:05.280 --> 17:12.040]  of returning profits, is not affected by fluctuations in oil prices and interest rates, is publicly
[17:12.040 --> 17:13.960]  traded and SEC regulated?
[17:13.960 --> 17:18.880]  If this kind of peace of mind is what you have been looking for in an investment, then
[17:18.880 --> 17:21.840]  life settlements is the investment for you.
[17:21.840 --> 17:27.760]  Our annual rate of return has been 15.83% for the last 17 years.
[17:27.760 --> 17:31.520]  Our investments are insurance and banking commission regulated.
[17:31.520 --> 17:35.400]  Our returns are assured by the largest insurance companies.
[17:35.400 --> 17:41.440]  Even qualified retirement plans such as 401Ks and IRAs are eligible for transfer.
[17:41.440 --> 17:47.160]  We charge absolutely no commissions, 100% of your investment goes to work for you.
[17:47.160 --> 17:56.640]  Please visit sleepwellinvestment.com or call Bill Shelbur at 817-975-2431.
[17:56.640 --> 18:17.680]  Sleepwellinvestment.com or call 817-975-2431.
[18:27.640 --> 18:46.640]  I won't, no I won't, I won't let you pull the wool over my eyes, they must refuse your
[18:46.640 --> 18:57.640]  nose or soak up in lye, it seems you like to spare, but please take some words to the
[18:57.640 --> 19:19.640]  eyes, please stop trying to pull the wool over my eyes.
[19:19.640 --> 19:20.640]  Okay, we're back.
[19:20.640 --> 19:25.640]  The Rule of Law, Randy Kelton and Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio.
[19:25.640 --> 19:33.640]  Okay, Julio, if you want to hang on please, Eddie has called back in so let's finish up
[19:33.640 --> 19:34.640]  with Eddie.
[19:34.640 --> 19:39.640]  Okay Eddie, so continue on, you've got the situation here apparently that you've uncovered.
[19:39.640 --> 19:49.640]  Yes, so in 2005 the Comptroller came into my business once in early in May and they
[19:49.640 --> 19:54.640]  seized my bank account without a warrant or a court order and stole all the money in it.
[19:54.640 --> 19:58.640]  The finance code forbids that because the banking institution does not have anyone
[19:58.640 --> 20:02.640]  named within this state as a representative to receive process.
[20:02.640 --> 20:06.640]  They instead served it on a representative in Tupelo, Mississippi which the law says
[20:06.640 --> 20:10.640]  can't happen because they're an out of state bank.
[20:10.640 --> 20:15.640]  But anyway they seized it without warrant or a court order and then in September right
[20:15.640 --> 20:20.640]  before Hurricane Rita came through Nacogdoches I live at the same place where I work.
[20:20.640 --> 20:24.640]  They came in, kicked me out into the weather and locked up my building and basically stole
[20:24.640 --> 20:26.640]  my landlord's building and all of my property.
[20:26.640 --> 20:29.640]  Again, no warrant, no court order.
[20:29.640 --> 20:38.640]  They then forced me to falsify sales tax returns or they would sell my business and they did
[20:38.640 --> 20:42.640]  all of this without even so much as a hearing.
[20:42.640 --> 20:49.640]  Well, they again in February 10th of this year seized my bank account again because
[20:49.640 --> 20:53.640]  I would not collect or file these returns.
[20:53.640 --> 21:01.640]  And then on Wednesday they came in, changed the locks on my building and once again stole
[21:01.640 --> 21:05.640]  my whole business and my landlord's building from him.
[21:05.640 --> 21:11.640]  No due process, no warrant, no court order, no anything.
[21:11.640 --> 21:19.640]  So basically speaking they are digging themselves some extremely serious felony grade holes here.
[21:19.640 --> 21:23.640]  And that's the reason why I wanted to call in tonight and make sure that I sent Randy
[21:23.640 --> 21:27.640]  a copy of the complaints and everything that I'm making against these guys and see if he
[21:27.640 --> 21:32.640]  would mind taking a look at them and seeing if there's anything that he would recommend
[21:32.640 --> 21:34.640]  above and beyond what I'm attempting to do.
[21:34.640 --> 21:38.640]  I mean I've got a laundry list of charges as long as my arm.
[21:38.640 --> 21:43.640]  I've got at least a dozen charges against every person here.
[21:43.640 --> 21:47.640]  They actually came in with a locksmith, removed the locks from my door without my consent
[21:47.640 --> 21:52.640]  and since they had no warrant and I had a no trespass notice posted in my window,
[21:52.640 --> 21:59.640]  they're now guilty of aggravated burglary and aggravated robbery.
[21:59.640 --> 22:04.640]  So needless to say we've got a lot of things going on here in this small town.
[22:04.640 --> 22:05.640]  Hello?
[22:05.640 --> 22:06.640]  Okay.
[22:06.640 --> 22:10.640]  I'm sorry you are so quiet, it must be you gasly on that end.
[22:10.640 --> 22:11.640]  Yeah, really.
[22:11.640 --> 22:14.640]  Were any of those officers armed?
[22:14.640 --> 22:16.640]  Oh man, they were armed to the teeth, Randy.
[22:16.640 --> 22:20.640]  They came in here looking like they were fixing to raid Grenada or take over a small country.
[22:20.640 --> 22:22.640]  Did they have weapons in their hands?
[22:22.640 --> 22:25.640]  They had pistols, they had gas, you name it.
[22:25.640 --> 22:27.640]  Did they have them in their hands?
[22:27.640 --> 22:28.640]  Yes, they did.
[22:28.640 --> 22:31.640]  Did anyone direct a weapon at your person?
[22:31.640 --> 22:34.640]  They didn't point the gun directly at me, no.
[22:34.640 --> 22:40.640]  But they did chase the reporter that wrote these articles out the door with one.
[22:40.640 --> 22:42.640]  He showed up while they were there.
[22:42.640 --> 22:44.640]  They pointed a weapon at a reporter?
[22:44.640 --> 22:46.640]  Yeah, and ran him back out.
[22:46.640 --> 22:47.640]  Are you in the past?
[22:47.640 --> 22:48.640]  Get out, get out.
[22:48.640 --> 22:49.640]  Okay.
[22:49.640 --> 22:50.640]  Oh man.
[22:50.640 --> 22:55.640]  Did they direct a weapon in your general direction?
[22:55.640 --> 23:06.640]  The only one that had his weapon in his hand that could have been pointed anywhere toward me was Officer Reed who was carrying an M4 carbine.
[23:06.640 --> 23:08.640]  Good enough.
[23:08.640 --> 23:25.640]  Read 22.04, I'm sorry, 22.02 penal code, paragraph B, let me see, paragraph 2B.
[23:25.640 --> 23:27.640]  Let me pull that one up.
[23:27.640 --> 23:31.640]  What it says is, that's aggravated assault.
[23:31.640 --> 23:33.640]  Correct.
[23:33.640 --> 23:35.640]  Yes, that's one of the charges I'm pressing.
[23:35.640 --> 23:44.640]  Okay, what it says is a person commits aggravated assault if he commits assault as defined in 22.01.
[23:44.640 --> 23:52.640]  22.01 is to threaten with bodily harm or offensive contact that a person will find offensive.
[23:52.640 --> 24:02.640]  If he does so while displaying a deadly weapon, that's aggravated assault and it is a second degree felony.
[24:02.640 --> 24:07.640]  Except that, if the person is a public official.
[24:07.640 --> 24:09.640]  It goes up to the next degree.
[24:09.640 --> 24:14.640]  Yes, acting under color authority, then it's a first degree felony.
[24:14.640 --> 24:22.640]  I did, I searched on Lexus, not one single hit, period.
[24:22.640 --> 24:23.640]  Yeah.
[24:23.640 --> 24:26.640]  Never been adjudicated.
[24:26.640 --> 24:29.640]  First blush.
[24:29.640 --> 24:32.640]  No one's went after him for it.
[24:32.640 --> 24:41.640]  You make an allegation of first degree felony aggravated assault against them all.
[24:41.640 --> 24:44.640]  Give them to the district attorney.
[24:44.640 --> 24:47.640]  District attorney says you can't just go to the grand jury?
[24:47.640 --> 24:49.640]  Fine.
[24:49.640 --> 24:50.640]  Here you go, bubba.
[24:50.640 --> 24:53.640]  You take them to the grand jury.
[24:53.640 --> 24:57.640]  Don't go to the grand jury with these complaints.
[24:57.640 --> 25:00.640]  Go to the prosecutor with them.
[25:00.640 --> 25:03.640]  The prosecutor's going to refuse to give them to the grand jury.
[25:03.640 --> 25:04.640]  Right.
[25:04.640 --> 25:09.640]  Then the next time the grand jury meets, you go down there and you go up to the bailiff
[25:09.640 --> 25:14.640]  and you tell the bailiff, instruct the foreman, I have business with the grand jury.
[25:14.640 --> 25:17.640]  And the foreman will say, may I tell him the nature of the business?
[25:17.640 --> 25:18.640]  Yes, you may.
[25:18.640 --> 25:21.640]  Give him these complaints.
[25:21.640 --> 25:26.640]  And there will be 12 documents there, one for each grand jury member.
[25:26.640 --> 25:30.640]  And the bailiff's going to get this look in his eye.
[25:30.640 --> 25:37.640]  This one happened in Trouters County and also happened in Johnson County.
[25:37.640 --> 25:38.640]  Johnson County was fun.
[25:38.640 --> 25:42.640]  The guy gets this look in his eye and I said, hold on there, hold on there.
[25:42.640 --> 25:45.640]  I think I know what you're thinking.
[25:45.640 --> 25:51.640]  You're thinking I need to call the district attorney.
[25:51.640 --> 25:54.640]  Bad idea, bubba.
[25:54.640 --> 25:56.640]  These complaints are against the district attorney.
[25:56.640 --> 26:00.640]  If you call the district attorney and he comes down here,
[26:00.640 --> 26:04.640]  I'll consider that you're acting in concert and collusion with the district attorney
[26:04.640 --> 26:11.640]  to shield the district attorney from prosecution in violation of 3805 penal code.
[26:11.640 --> 26:15.640]  So life is filled with little decisions, bubba.
[26:15.640 --> 26:18.640]  Your turn to make one.
[26:18.640 --> 26:23.640]  He turned around, walked right in the grand jury and gave them the files.
[26:23.640 --> 26:24.640]  They called me in.
[26:24.640 --> 26:27.640]  I presented the district attorney to him.
[26:27.640 --> 26:30.640]  So set up the district attorney.
[26:30.640 --> 26:33.640]  He thinks he has prosecutorial discretion.
[26:33.640 --> 26:35.640]  Let him exercise it.
[26:35.640 --> 26:40.640]  Yes, she's new, but you would think she would at least know what the law is.
[26:40.640 --> 26:43.640]  Obviously from her statement in the paper she doesn't.
[26:43.640 --> 26:49.640]  And I even wrote a nice little reply to the reporter himself stating exactly those sections of law
[26:49.640 --> 26:54.640]  that she has failed to read that makes her discretion nonexistent.
[26:54.640 --> 26:55.640]  Wonderful.
[26:55.640 --> 26:58.640]  So set her up.
[26:58.640 --> 27:05.640]  And I can almost guarantee you she will be incredibly obliging.
[27:05.640 --> 27:09.640]  My main concern for the most part is to manage to get something done
[27:09.640 --> 27:12.640]  before they attempt to auction off my business,
[27:12.640 --> 27:15.640]  at least the parts of it they think they got a hold of.
[27:15.640 --> 27:17.640]  Petition for restraining order, emergency restraining order.
[27:17.640 --> 27:20.640]  Make your allegations to the court.
[27:20.640 --> 27:23.640]  And now you get to put everything before the court.
[27:23.640 --> 27:29.640]  You can keep this stuff a long time because now we go to how to deal with the judge.
[27:29.640 --> 27:32.640]  You put the law in front of the judge.
[27:32.640 --> 27:40.640]  And when the judge fails to apply the standing law to the facts of the case,
[27:40.640 --> 27:43.640]  you sue the judge, counter-sue the judge.
[27:43.640 --> 27:45.640]  Now this district criminal court?
[27:45.640 --> 27:48.640]  This district, this district civil.
[27:48.640 --> 27:57.640]  You file for emergency restraining order claiming violations of law on the part of these people.
[27:57.640 --> 28:02.640]  And generally you'll get that out of hand.
[28:02.640 --> 28:04.640]  And that's just to stop them from,
[28:04.640 --> 28:10.640]  and you show in your order that if the court allows this to proceed,
[28:10.640 --> 28:16.640]  the harm will occur that cannot be repaired.
[28:16.640 --> 28:24.640]  It's not like they're just going to hold your property for a while.
[28:24.640 --> 28:28.640]  They're going to sell your property so they can't unsell it once it's sold
[28:28.640 --> 28:35.640]  without causing serious harm to other people and increasing and causing other litigation.
[28:35.640 --> 28:39.640]  So this is what restraining orders are really for.
[28:39.640 --> 28:42.640]  You stop them long enough to have a show cause hearing.
[28:42.640 --> 28:46.640]  They've got 14 days to have a show cause hearing.
[28:46.640 --> 28:52.640]  And it appears as though you've done a lot more homework than they have.
[28:52.640 --> 28:54.640]  Most certainly.
[28:54.640 --> 28:56.640]  You bring the law before the court
[28:56.640 --> 29:02.640]  and what you want to do is petition for recovery
[29:02.640 --> 29:08.640]  or I'm thinking an emergency restraining order, how do we do this?
[29:08.640 --> 29:10.640]  A restraining order or an injunction?
[29:10.640 --> 29:13.640]  They're both the same thing.
[29:13.640 --> 29:15.640]  It's just an order by the court stopping them.
[29:15.640 --> 29:20.640]  They both come under, I think it's chapter 52, along with, no, no, no,
[29:20.640 --> 29:22.640]  what does the restraining order come under?
[29:22.640 --> 29:25.640]  This was read the other day.
[29:25.640 --> 29:28.640]  Anyway, an injunction and restraining order, same thing.
[29:28.640 --> 29:31.640]  It's just an order from the court to stop.
[29:31.640 --> 29:37.640]  But you want to put in your documents,
[29:37.640 --> 29:39.640]  I'll think of it after the break.
[29:39.640 --> 29:41.640]  Okay, yeah, hold on.
[29:41.640 --> 29:43.640]  Judicial notice.
[29:43.640 --> 29:45.640]  Judicial notice.
[29:45.640 --> 29:47.640]  Yeah, hold on one second, Eddie.
[29:47.640 --> 29:49.640]  We'll get back to you on the other side.
[29:49.640 --> 29:51.640]  And Julio as well, plus all the other callers.
[29:51.640 --> 29:52.640]  We'll be right back.
[29:52.640 --> 29:58.640]  This is a rule of law on ruleoflawradio.com.
[29:58.640 --> 30:00.640]  Gold prices are at historic highs
[30:00.640 --> 30:03.640]  and with the recent pullback, this is a great time to buy.
[30:03.640 --> 30:06.640]  With the value of the dollar, risks of inflation,
[30:06.640 --> 30:09.640]  political uncertainties, and instability in world financial systems,
[30:09.640 --> 30:11.640]  I see gold going up much higher.
[30:11.640 --> 30:14.640]  Hi, I'm Tim Fry at Roberts and Roberts Brokerage.
[30:14.640 --> 30:16.640]  Everybody should have some of their assets
[30:16.640 --> 30:18.640]  in investment grade precious metals.
[30:18.640 --> 30:21.640]  At Roberts and Roberts Brokerage, you can buy gold, silver, and platinum
[30:21.640 --> 30:24.640]  with confidence from a brokerage that's specialized
[30:24.640 --> 30:27.640]  in the precious metals market since 1977.
[30:27.640 --> 30:30.640]  If you are new to precious metals, we will happily provide you
[30:30.640 --> 30:33.640]  with the information you need to make an informed decision
[30:33.640 --> 30:35.640]  whether or not you choose to purchase from us.
[30:35.640 --> 30:38.640]  Also, Roberts and Roberts Brokerage values your privacy
[30:38.640 --> 30:41.640]  and will always advise you in the event that we would be required
[30:41.640 --> 30:43.640]  to report any transaction.
[30:43.640 --> 30:46.640]  If you have gold, silver, or platinum you'd like to sell,
[30:46.640 --> 30:48.640]  we can convert it for immediate payment.
[30:48.640 --> 30:52.640]  Call us at 800-874-9760.
[30:52.640 --> 30:58.640]  We're Roberts and Roberts Brokerage, 800-874-9760.
[30:58.640 --> 31:06.640]  Hello? Yes, George. How good of you to call.
[31:06.640 --> 31:11.640]  Yeah, we had dinner with the Chaneys last week.
[31:11.640 --> 31:17.640]  We had a great time just sitting around talking about politics.
[31:17.640 --> 31:22.640]  And I saw when Mr. Chaney was paying for the tab,
[31:22.640 --> 31:27.640]  I saw a big red stain on his wall.
[31:27.640 --> 31:30.640]  And I was thinking to myself,
[31:30.640 --> 31:34.640]  you know, the war must be going spending.
[31:34.640 --> 31:40.640]  All right, red money. More three-shoes posse for you.
[31:40.640 --> 31:44.640]  Okay, Randy, you were talking about judicial notice
[31:44.640 --> 31:46.640]  right before we went into the break.
[31:46.640 --> 31:49.640]  When you file for your injunction,
[31:49.640 --> 31:52.640]  include in their judicial notice,
[31:52.640 --> 31:56.640]  you notice the facts of what they have done,
[31:56.640 --> 32:03.640]  and then you make judicial notice of the law applying to those facts.
[32:03.640 --> 32:07.640]  The other side has to refute each point of judicial notice.
[32:07.640 --> 32:11.640]  If they don't, then they stipulate.
[32:11.640 --> 32:13.640]  And if this is a new prosecutor,
[32:13.640 --> 32:17.640]  she's probably not going to understand that yet.
[32:17.640 --> 32:18.640]  All right.
[32:18.640 --> 32:21.640]  Because generally attorneys don't do that to each other.
[32:21.640 --> 32:25.640]  And primarily what we're doing is setting up the judge.
[32:25.640 --> 32:26.640]  Okay.
[32:26.640 --> 32:28.640]  What section of law will cover the judicial notice, Randy,
[32:28.640 --> 32:30.640]  so I can reference that, or do you know?
[32:30.640 --> 32:33.640]  I'll have to look it up. I forgot.
[32:33.640 --> 32:37.640]  Do you have O'Connor's Texas Rules of Civil Trials?
[32:37.640 --> 32:39.640]  No, but I can certainly find that.
[32:39.640 --> 32:40.640]  Oh, oh, oh.
[32:40.640 --> 32:43.640]  No, I don't think it's covered in law.
[32:43.640 --> 32:45.640]  I think it's a maxim.
[32:45.640 --> 32:46.640]  It's a maxim?
[32:46.640 --> 32:47.640]  Yeah.
[32:47.640 --> 32:48.640]  Okay.
[32:48.640 --> 32:50.640]  It's just one of those things that's always there.
[32:50.640 --> 32:56.640]  It's actually admissions, and it goes to National Cash Register,
[32:56.640 --> 33:04.640]  where if a, I don't know what to call it.
[33:04.640 --> 33:06.640]  I hate that.
[33:06.640 --> 33:11.640]  If you file a statement of fact and it's not refuted within 30 days,
[33:11.640 --> 33:16.640]  then it cannot be refuted, and that's National Cash Register.
[33:16.640 --> 33:18.640]  Okay, yeah, that I've done before.
[33:18.640 --> 33:30.640]  So you may not get 30 days, but if you file the judicial notice,
[33:30.640 --> 33:32.640]  then you establish the facts.
[33:32.640 --> 33:38.640]  If they don't dispute the facts, then they stand as undisputable facts,
[33:38.640 --> 33:41.640]  and most of the facts you're going to establish,
[33:41.640 --> 33:45.640]  they're going to readily agree with all of the things that they did.
[33:45.640 --> 33:51.640]  And then you state judicial notice of the statutes,
[33:51.640 --> 33:53.640]  and then it's up to them to argue.
[33:53.640 --> 33:57.640]  What they violated or what the statute allows them to do versus what they did.
[33:57.640 --> 34:01.640]  Yes, exactly, what the statute allows them to do.
[34:01.640 --> 34:06.640]  You don't, in the judicial notice, don't do arguments.
[34:06.640 --> 34:11.640]  Say, here are the facts, here's the law relating to the facts.
[34:11.640 --> 34:15.640]  You know what I find interesting about their limitation of understanding
[34:15.640 --> 34:20.640]  of their own rules is they always cite section 111.021 as their authority to seize,
[34:20.640 --> 34:23.640]  yet that section says absolutely nothing about that.
[34:23.640 --> 34:31.640]  But right above 111.021 is 111.02, which specifically states
[34:31.640 --> 34:36.640]  the comp filter may adopt no rules that violate the Constitution of the United States,
[34:36.640 --> 34:39.640]  this state, or the laws of this state.
[34:39.640 --> 34:40.640]  Good.
[34:40.640 --> 34:43.640]  And they think they can come in two sections later
[34:43.640 --> 34:46.640]  and steal property without due process of law.
[34:46.640 --> 34:53.640]  Well, okay, try not to, try to, okay, here's what the judge can do.
[34:53.640 --> 35:00.640]  He can take the law as it's handed down to him by the higher courts
[35:00.640 --> 35:05.640]  and apply that law to the facts established in the case.
[35:05.640 --> 35:08.640]  That's all he can do.
[35:08.640 --> 35:09.640]  Okay.
[35:09.640 --> 35:16.640]  If the judge wants to draw a conclusion about the law, about what the law means,
[35:16.640 --> 35:20.640]  then he violates a ministerial duty.
[35:20.640 --> 35:23.640]  You can sue him for that.
[35:23.640 --> 35:27.640]  If he fails to accurately apply the law to the facts,
[35:27.640 --> 35:35.640]  he commits an act of abuse of discretion, and you can sue him for that.
[35:35.640 --> 35:37.640]  That's what you want to set him up for.
[35:37.640 --> 35:40.640]  Another comment, too, because a lot of times,
[35:40.640 --> 35:47.640]  Randy and I see documents written by a lot of legal activists, so to speak,
[35:47.640 --> 35:52.640]  around in the movement, and they're all full of conclusions.
[35:52.640 --> 35:58.640]  And, you know, we've just illustrated that even these judges are not allowed
[35:58.640 --> 36:01.640]  to come to their own conclusions about law,
[36:01.640 --> 36:05.640]  unless they're an appellate court judge or Supreme Court judge
[36:05.640 --> 36:10.640]  that can't come to conclusions about law or make interpretations.
[36:10.640 --> 36:15.640]  Not even the lower judges are allowed to do that, and so certainly we can't.
[36:15.640 --> 36:20.640]  It's not our place to make conclusions and theorize about what the law means.
[36:20.640 --> 36:23.640]  We have to just present the law as it is.
[36:23.640 --> 36:30.640]  Yes, and as a rule of thumb, try to make no positive statement concerning law
[36:30.640 --> 36:32.640]  from your words.
[36:32.640 --> 36:33.640]  Okay.
[36:33.640 --> 36:40.640]  If you read these briefs and especially court decisions,
[36:40.640 --> 36:44.640]  you'll see where they make a statement,
[36:44.640 --> 36:47.640]  and then they list the cases they got that statement from.
[36:47.640 --> 36:49.640]  Yeah, they took it verbatim, right?
[36:49.640 --> 36:50.640]  Yeah.
[36:50.640 --> 36:55.640]  Sometimes they'll paraphrase it, but they reference where they got it from.
[36:55.640 --> 37:00.640]  So they're saying, these aren't my words, these are the court's words.
[37:00.640 --> 37:03.640]  That's what has to be there.
[37:03.640 --> 37:05.640]  Your words mean nothing.
[37:05.640 --> 37:08.640]  Your words is just your belief in your idea,
[37:08.640 --> 37:12.640]  and this is where a lot of legal reform guys have a problem,
[37:12.640 --> 37:16.640]  because they think their words are important before the court,
[37:16.640 --> 37:19.640]  and it hurt their feelings to think that they weren't.
[37:19.640 --> 37:20.640]  Right.
[37:20.640 --> 37:22.640]  But they're not important before the court.
[37:22.640 --> 37:26.640]  The court doesn't care about what you think or what you believe.
[37:26.640 --> 37:33.640]  The court can only care about what the higher courts have ruled.
[37:33.640 --> 37:38.640]  So you give him those rules, you put him on that legal dime.
[37:38.640 --> 37:39.640]  Okay.
[37:39.640 --> 37:41.640]  Well, then that leaves me with another question,
[37:41.640 --> 37:43.640]  considering what we're talking about here.
[37:43.640 --> 37:45.640]  There isn't, according to their law,
[37:45.640 --> 37:50.640]  the only court that has jurisdiction over tax issues is in Travis County.
[37:50.640 --> 37:56.640]  However, what I'm going after is the criminal side of what they did.
[37:56.640 --> 37:58.640]  So which one should I be addressing?
[37:58.640 --> 38:02.640]  What they're trying to say gives them the authority to do it,
[38:02.640 --> 38:07.640]  or what I'm saying they did in violation of the law to exercise that authority.
[38:07.640 --> 38:09.640]  Oh, it doesn't matter who gave them the authority.
[38:09.640 --> 38:11.640]  It doesn't matter where that comes from.
[38:11.640 --> 38:14.640]  Wherever the crime is committed, venue stands in the county.
[38:14.640 --> 38:16.640]  No, no, no, I understand that.
[38:16.640 --> 38:20.640]  But I'm saying when I address these judicial notice of facts,
[38:20.640 --> 38:23.640]  I'm addressing the criminal acts they committed,
[38:23.640 --> 38:27.640]  not the tax insinuations they're making.
[38:27.640 --> 38:31.640]  If you're moving to stop the sale...
[38:31.640 --> 38:32.640]  Right.
[38:32.640 --> 38:36.640] ...then you have to show some authority.
[38:36.640 --> 38:37.640]  Oh, okay.
[38:37.640 --> 38:40.640]  I'd have to look at your documents to see how they're structured.
[38:40.640 --> 38:47.640]  Showing that they acted outside law would be sufficient to bring them outside scope of authority.
[38:47.640 --> 38:52.640]  And if they're not acting within the scope of their authority,
[38:52.640 --> 38:55.640]  then there is no jurisdiction.
[38:55.640 --> 38:56.640]  Right.
[38:56.640 --> 38:58.640]  And you can show they have no jurisdiction to act.
[38:58.640 --> 39:05.640]  Well, see, the reason I'm asking it that way is because if my reading of the tax code is correct
[39:05.640 --> 39:13.640]  and the term taxpayer cannot be applied to me as a man and as a sole proprietor, not a legal entity,
[39:13.640 --> 39:19.640]  then the tax court in Travis County wouldn't have impersonal jurisdiction over me
[39:19.640 --> 39:25.640]  because I'm not a legal entity that their law applies to.
[39:25.640 --> 39:28.640]  Good point.
[39:28.640 --> 39:29.640]  And considering...
[39:29.640 --> 39:33.640]  I'm not tax code if the code never applied to me to begin with.
[39:33.640 --> 39:37.640]  That sounds like it's time for an abatement.
[39:37.640 --> 39:38.640]  No, there's no court case.
[39:38.640 --> 39:40.640]  Oh, there's no court case?
[39:40.640 --> 39:43.640]  Yeah, they acted extrajudicially.
[39:43.640 --> 39:45.640]  Oh, my goodness.
[39:45.640 --> 39:51.640]  This also appears to go to confessed judgment.
[39:51.640 --> 39:56.640]  And confessed judgment, as I understand, is not something of research.
[39:56.640 --> 40:01.640]  This is what I've been told is confessed judgment in Texas is forbidden,
[40:01.640 --> 40:04.640]  and Russell Mortland will know more about that.
[40:04.640 --> 40:06.640]  Actually, Russell's on the line right now.
[40:06.640 --> 40:08.640]  Let's see what he thinks about it.
[40:08.640 --> 40:12.640]  Okay, Russell, what do you have to say about it?
[40:12.640 --> 40:17.640]  State of Texas is done away with it next month.
[40:17.640 --> 40:20.640]  With the...
[40:20.640 --> 40:21.640]  Get away with what?
[40:21.640 --> 40:23.640]  The prohibition against confessed judgment?
[40:23.640 --> 40:24.640]  Yeah.
[40:24.640 --> 40:26.640]  Okay, well, it hasn't gone yet.
[40:26.640 --> 40:28.640]  It's repealed as of April.
[40:28.640 --> 40:31.640]  Okay, but what I've got to say, you're probably going to like.
[40:31.640 --> 40:34.640]  The man applied for a business license.
[40:34.640 --> 40:35.640]  No, I didn't.
[40:35.640 --> 40:36.640]  You did?
[40:36.640 --> 40:37.640]  No, I did not.
[40:37.640 --> 40:38.640]  They forced one on me.
[40:38.640 --> 40:41.640]  They brought one with them the first time they came in here
[40:41.640 --> 40:45.640]  and threw it in my hands and said, here's your certificate.
[40:45.640 --> 40:50.640]  You have no signatures on any of their documents whatsoever to show that you're a business?
[40:50.640 --> 40:55.640]  When I first filed, I originally did, but I sent in a removal for that.
[40:55.640 --> 40:58.640]  I turned around and had all of that withdrawn.
[40:58.640 --> 41:02.640]  I filed documentation with them in writing to withdraw my signature
[41:02.640 --> 41:06.640]  and any agreements I made with them when I found out what was going on.
[41:06.640 --> 41:12.640]  And that's when I ceased and desisted on collecting any tax for them.
[41:12.640 --> 41:16.640]  They have refused to remove me from their system,
[41:16.640 --> 41:20.640]  even though I have served them in writing to have them do so
[41:20.640 --> 41:27.640]  because I would not accept the benefit of their certificate.
[41:27.640 --> 41:29.640]  That would make for an interesting case.
[41:29.640 --> 41:33.640]  Yeah.
[41:33.640 --> 41:37.640]  I almost think that he has a better shot doing all this administratively
[41:37.640 --> 41:39.640]  than trying to go to court.
[41:39.640 --> 41:43.640]  Well, right now he has to stop them from selling his property.
[41:43.640 --> 41:51.640]  So I think he could do an administrative order, too.
[41:51.640 --> 41:57.640]  What's the difference?
[41:57.640 --> 41:59.640]  And try to speak up a little bit, Russell.
[41:59.640 --> 42:00.640]  Okay.
[42:00.640 --> 42:02.640]  I'd have to do a little bit of research on that.
[42:02.640 --> 42:05.640]  I can't say for right now on the phone.
[42:05.640 --> 42:06.640]  Okay.
[42:06.640 --> 42:12.640]  Then, well, I'd say next Thursday, Will, can you call back in?
[42:12.640 --> 42:13.640]  Sure.
[42:13.640 --> 42:14.640]  Good.
[42:14.640 --> 42:15.640]  We'll pick this up.
[42:15.640 --> 42:17.640]  That will give you time to go over your documentation.
[42:17.640 --> 42:18.640]  Okay.
[42:18.640 --> 42:19.640]  Good.
[42:19.640 --> 42:21.640]  Because we're both going to have to look at this
[42:21.640 --> 42:23.640]  and see which way is the best way to go on it.
[42:23.640 --> 42:26.640]  Yeah, I mean, any help I can give would be appreciated.
[42:26.640 --> 42:30.640]  I mean, I know that what I've read in the law says they're not allowed to do this
[42:30.640 --> 42:34.640]  because it doesn't apply to us, but that's not keeping them from doing it yet.
[42:34.640 --> 42:39.640]  Well, the way we get it done is set up the judge so you can sting the judge.
[42:39.640 --> 42:40.640]  Right.
[42:40.640 --> 42:45.640]  You start stinging him, he's going to stop protecting these guys.
[42:45.640 --> 42:46.640]  Right.
[42:46.640 --> 42:48.640]  Then we may actually get something done.
[42:48.640 --> 42:53.640]  And if they have any bar cards involved with any of this,
[42:53.640 --> 42:59.640]  we will introduce them to the joys of bar grievances.
[42:59.640 --> 43:01.640]  That sounds good to me.
[43:01.640 --> 43:06.640]  I'm getting to be known quite as a very irritating sore in this area.
[43:06.640 --> 43:07.640]  Good.
[43:07.640 --> 43:08.640]  No, you're not known for that.
[43:08.640 --> 43:10.640]  You're going to be known on the terrorist watch list.
[43:10.640 --> 43:11.640]  Yeah, that too.
[43:11.640 --> 43:12.640]  That's all right.
[43:12.640 --> 43:15.640]  I'm single, no kids, nobody to threaten but me.
[43:15.640 --> 43:16.640]  Bring it on.
[43:16.640 --> 43:17.640]  Yeah.
[43:17.640 --> 43:22.640]  Well, there's one other thing and I lost it.
[43:22.640 --> 43:23.640]  Anyway.
[43:23.640 --> 43:24.640]  Hurry up and find it.
[43:24.640 --> 43:28.640]  Okay, we'll go back to this next Thursday.
[43:28.640 --> 43:32.640]  This could be an interesting story.
[43:32.640 --> 43:34.640]  This is going to be fun.
[43:34.640 --> 43:39.640]  All right, well, listen, we're going to break right now.
[43:39.640 --> 43:41.640]  Okay, Eddie, thanks for calling in.
[43:41.640 --> 43:42.640]  Yes, ma'am.
[43:42.640 --> 43:43.640]  Thank you.
[43:43.640 --> 43:44.640]  All right.
[43:44.640 --> 43:45.640]  Thanks, Russell.
[43:45.640 --> 43:46.640]  You can hang on the line.
[43:46.640 --> 43:47.640]  We'll get to you again in just one moment.
[43:47.640 --> 43:48.640]  All right.
[43:48.640 --> 43:50.640]  We're going to go back to Julio as soon as we get back on the other side.
[43:50.640 --> 43:54.640]  We've also got Gail, Russell, Dominic, and Rick.
[43:54.640 --> 43:58.640]  We'll be right back.
[43:58.640 --> 44:01.640]  Stock markets are taking hit after hit.
[44:01.640 --> 44:04.640]  Corrupt bankers are choking on subprime debt.
[44:04.640 --> 44:08.640]  The Fed is busy printing dollars, dollars, and more dollars
[44:08.640 --> 44:12.640]  to bail out Wall Street, banks, and the U.S. car industry.
[44:12.640 --> 44:15.640]  As investors scramble for safety in the metals,
[44:15.640 --> 44:18.640]  in the face of a further devaluation of the dollar,
[44:18.640 --> 44:21.640]  the price of silver will only increase.
[44:21.640 --> 44:25.640]  Some of the world's leading financial analysts believe that silver
[44:25.640 --> 44:28.640]  is one of the world's most important commodities
[44:28.640 --> 44:32.640]  with unparalleled investment opportunity for the future.
[44:32.640 --> 44:37.640]  Now is the time to buy silver before it heads for $75 an ounce,
[44:37.640 --> 44:43.640]  and the yellow metal roars back past $1,000 an ounce to new highs.
[44:43.640 --> 44:50.640]  Call Maximus Holdings now at 407-608-5430
[44:50.640 --> 44:55.640]  to find out how you can turn your IRA and 401K into a solid investment.
[44:55.640 --> 44:58.640]  Silver without any penalties for early withdrawal.
[44:58.640 --> 45:01.640]  Even if you don't have a retirement account yet,
[45:01.640 --> 45:04.640]  we have fantastic investment opportunities for you.
[45:04.640 --> 45:11.640]  Call Maximus Holdings at 407-608-5430 for more information.
[45:11.640 --> 45:26.640]  Music
[45:26.640 --> 45:39.640]  Music
[45:39.640 --> 45:49.640]  Music
[45:49.640 --> 45:59.640]  Music
[45:59.640 --> 46:09.640]  Music
[46:09.640 --> 46:19.640]  Music
[46:19.640 --> 46:29.640]  Music
[46:29.640 --> 46:39.640]  Music
[46:39.640 --> 46:45.640]  Alright, we're going to fight in the war we can win.
[46:45.640 --> 46:49.640]  Not the one they would have us in.
[46:49.640 --> 46:52.640]  We're picking the fight this time, right Randy?
[46:52.640 --> 46:53.640]  Right.
[46:53.640 --> 46:56.640]  Words of wisdom from Jerry Stevens, my husband,
[46:56.640 --> 47:00.640]  Three Shoes Posse and also the Route One band coming at you.
[47:00.640 --> 47:04.640]  Alright, we're going to go back now to Julio from Texas,
[47:04.640 --> 47:07.640]  and we were talking about Judge's Manual.
[47:07.640 --> 47:11.640]  Alright, they're not following the law, they're not following their own manual.
[47:11.640 --> 47:13.640]  Okay, we got Julio back up on the line.
[47:13.640 --> 47:15.640]  Julio, sorry to cut you off there.
[47:15.640 --> 47:19.640]  We had to go back to Eddie, though, because we had started him first.
[47:19.640 --> 47:23.640]  Well, I was just really trying to tell you that according to their own manual,
[47:23.640 --> 47:27.640]  they're violating the rules, and I have a copy of the manual,
[47:27.640 --> 47:31.640]  and I will make it available to you next time I see you.
[47:31.640 --> 47:33.640]  Wonderful.
[47:33.640 --> 47:39.640]  Also, on the previous call, you were talking about the judicial notice.
[47:39.640 --> 47:41.640]  Wait, about what?
[47:41.640 --> 47:42.640]  Judicial notice.
[47:42.640 --> 47:44.640]  Judicial notice, yes.
[47:44.640 --> 47:48.640]  It's called Rule 301.
[47:48.640 --> 47:50.640]  Okay.
[47:50.640 --> 47:52.640]  Rule 41?
[47:52.640 --> 47:53.640]  201.
[47:53.640 --> 47:54.640]  201.
[47:54.640 --> 47:57.640]  201, yeah, you sound a little muffled, Julio.
[47:57.640 --> 48:04.640]  Wait a minute, 201, isn't that pre-litigation discovery?
[48:04.640 --> 48:12.640]  No, if you look at the code, it will give you some information.
[48:12.640 --> 48:18.640]  It's Rule 21, the court has authority to take judicial notice of adjudicated fact
[48:18.640 --> 48:20.640]  at any stage of the proceeding.
[48:20.640 --> 48:24.640]  And that's Code of Criminal – I mean, Rules of Civil Procedure?
[48:24.640 --> 48:26.640]  Yes, sir.
[48:26.640 --> 48:27.640]  Oh.
[48:27.640 --> 48:28.640]  Who?
[48:28.640 --> 48:34.640]  It must be 202 that's pre-litigation discovery.
[48:34.640 --> 48:35.640]  Okay.
[48:35.640 --> 48:37.640]  Okay, good, wonderful.
[48:37.640 --> 48:43.640]  And then you must provide the court with facts, okay?
[48:43.640 --> 48:48.640]  Like you were saying, what you're saying means nothing.
[48:48.640 --> 48:53.640]  The court can only deal with facts, and it has to be facts from another court.
[48:53.640 --> 48:59.640]  Another way to say that if a court has already made a ruling on that particular case
[48:59.640 --> 49:03.640]  or a similar case, we don't have to rediscover the wheel.
[49:03.640 --> 49:07.640]  The wheel is already there, so we just told the court a case in fact like that
[49:07.640 --> 49:10.640]  already happened in XYZ court.
[49:10.640 --> 49:13.640]  Here's the case.
[49:13.640 --> 49:14.640]  Exactly.
[49:14.640 --> 49:22.640]  This is how we get the judges to do what they should be doing.
[49:22.640 --> 49:28.640]  In some – in a lot of the cases, we're giving the judges short shrift
[49:28.640 --> 49:32.640]  by not giving them what they need to work with.
[49:32.640 --> 49:34.640]  A judge may agree with you.
[49:34.640 --> 49:35.640]  Yeah, but check this out.
[49:35.640 --> 49:37.640]  But if you don't give him law –
[49:37.640 --> 49:39.640]  Check this out, Randy.
[49:39.640 --> 49:45.640]  It is, man, the story that a court take a judicial notice and reports it by party.
[49:45.640 --> 49:49.640]  It don't have to be the guy that's in jail or anybody else.
[49:49.640 --> 49:51.640]  Anybody can do it.
[49:51.640 --> 49:53.640]  Is that right?
[49:53.640 --> 49:54.640]  Yeah.
[49:54.640 --> 49:56.640]  Oh, I have to go back and read that.
[49:56.640 --> 50:04.640]  As long as you plan with the necessary information and it's according to text R&B 21D,
[50:04.640 --> 50:10.640]  therefore the more important – the more important should attach the appropriate
[50:10.640 --> 50:13.640]  supporting documentation to the motion.
[50:13.640 --> 50:22.640]  And then to that, you say that R&B 31D section three, subsection four.
[50:22.640 --> 50:25.640]  We have to meet – I want to look at this.
[50:25.640 --> 50:27.640]  Wait, this time?
[50:27.640 --> 50:30.640]  This time you buy me breakfast.
[50:30.640 --> 50:31.640]  Okay.
[50:31.640 --> 50:32.640]  Yeah.
[50:32.640 --> 50:37.640]  Last time we met, Julio gave me such good information.
[50:37.640 --> 50:39.640]  Larry was sitting next to him.
[50:39.640 --> 50:45.640]  I told Larry that, you know, I'm across the table, can't reach him, but that's such good information.
[50:45.640 --> 50:48.640]  Larry, will you kiss Julio right on the mouth?
[50:48.640 --> 50:49.640]  Yes.
[50:49.640 --> 50:51.640]  And he wouldn't do it.
[50:51.640 --> 50:55.640]  Said he was too ugly.
[50:55.640 --> 50:59.640]  I will call him on it.
[50:59.640 --> 51:01.640]  Okay, wonderful.
[51:01.640 --> 51:03.640]  I'm sure going to want to see this.
[51:03.640 --> 51:04.640]  Yeah, I like to.
[51:04.640 --> 51:06.640]  You know, that's all I have to do.
[51:06.640 --> 51:08.640]  Okay, thank you.
[51:08.640 --> 51:09.640]  Yeah, thank you.
[51:09.640 --> 51:13.640]  Let me clean this up and I'll put it up there with the good information I have.
[51:13.640 --> 51:14.640]  Okay.
[51:14.640 --> 51:15.640]  Thanks a lot.
[51:15.640 --> 51:16.640]  All right.
[51:16.640 --> 51:17.640]  Thanks, Julio.
[51:17.640 --> 51:20.640]  Okay, let's go back to Russell because he was next in line.
[51:20.640 --> 51:27.640]  Russell, do you have anything for us or were you just calling to listen?
[51:27.640 --> 51:29.640]  I can't hear you, Russell.
[51:29.640 --> 51:38.640]  Randy will tell the audience that nobody's ever really challenged this due process issue
[51:38.640 --> 51:41.640]  throughout the court.
[51:41.640 --> 51:45.640]  And you were getting ready to do it in my case.
[51:45.640 --> 51:47.640]  I'm more than ready to do it.
[51:47.640 --> 51:48.640]  Yeah.
[51:48.640 --> 51:52.640]  Well, we just, you know, we've got to get through the state first so we can go either
[51:52.640 --> 51:56.640]  to the Supreme Court or up through the Fed Court and then the Supreme Court.
[51:56.640 --> 51:57.640]  Right.
[51:57.640 --> 51:59.640]  And nobody's ever challenged this.
[51:59.640 --> 52:02.640]  I mean, they basically say it in my case, well, too bad.
[52:02.640 --> 52:06.640]  There was an indictment so jurisdiction was done with.
[52:06.640 --> 52:09.640]  Well, no, that's not the way it worked.
[52:09.640 --> 52:10.640]  Exactly.
[52:10.640 --> 52:18.640]  What the court said in his appeal, we did Tom DeLay writ where we challenged the
[52:18.640 --> 52:22.640]  sufficiency of the indictment because there was no criminal complaint in support
[52:22.640 --> 52:24.640]  of the indictment.
[52:24.640 --> 52:26.640]  And the appeals court said, ah.
[52:26.640 --> 52:27.640]  There it looks.
[52:27.640 --> 52:28.640]  It doesn't make any difference.
[52:28.640 --> 52:31.640]  After indictment, nothing else matters.
[52:31.640 --> 52:39.640]  So I'm going to file criminal charges against the court for malfeasance in office
[52:39.640 --> 52:45.640]  because due process does matter at every phase.
[52:45.640 --> 52:49.640]  Absent a criminal complaint, there is no subject matter jurisdiction.
[52:49.640 --> 52:50.640]  The court knows it.
[52:50.640 --> 52:56.640]  The problem is they probably went and looked in the court record and found no
[52:56.640 --> 52:57.640]  criminal complaints.
[52:57.640 --> 53:03.640]  So they said, if we rule for this guy, we have to flush the jails.
[53:03.640 --> 53:04.640]  So they're not going to do that.
[53:04.640 --> 53:07.640]  They're going to try not to do that.
[53:07.640 --> 53:10.640]  But we'll work them out of here into the federal courts.
[53:10.640 --> 53:15.640]  Well, I think they ought to know me by now, but I'm hard headed.
[53:15.640 --> 53:18.640]  So I don't mind if it takes another four or five years.
[53:18.640 --> 53:21.640]  I'll take this thing all the way.
[53:21.640 --> 53:23.640]  That's what it's going to take.
[53:23.640 --> 53:26.640]  Me and you were talking a week or so ago.
[53:26.640 --> 53:28.640]  We've looked on Lexus.
[53:28.640 --> 53:33.640]  We can't find this issue ever being raised by anybody.
[53:33.640 --> 53:37.640]  I mean, everybody screams about due process on the lower end, but it doesn't seem
[53:37.640 --> 53:42.640]  to be raised in any higher courts at all when it comes to what we're trying to do.
[53:42.640 --> 53:43.640]  Right.
[53:43.640 --> 53:52.640]  I mean, they're talking about going after the duty of the appellate court to
[53:52.640 --> 53:57.640]  address all of the issues in the appeal.
[53:57.640 --> 54:00.640]  They just ignored them, just blew them off.
[54:00.640 --> 54:05.640]  And so what we're going to do is I'm planning on preparing criminal charges
[54:05.640 --> 54:09.640]  and taking them to the grand jury against these judges, charging them with
[54:09.640 --> 54:14.640]  malfeasance in office, which is official oppression.
[54:14.640 --> 54:18.640]  And we can't find any precedent for it.
[54:18.640 --> 54:21.640]  No attorney in his right mind would ever do it, but then I'm not an attorney.
[54:21.640 --> 54:26.640]  So I'm not going to have a client next week that they can screw royal to get
[54:26.640 --> 54:29.640]  back at me.
[54:29.640 --> 54:34.640]  And I don't have a bar card they can take away from me.
[54:34.640 --> 54:35.640]  So yeah, this is going to...
[54:35.640 --> 54:38.640]  Sure is monopolized, isn't it?
[54:38.640 --> 54:40.640]  Oh, yeah.
[54:40.640 --> 54:43.640]  It's going to get worse if we don't fix it.
[54:43.640 --> 54:49.640]  But once you get that Ohio judges conference thing broken up and be able to
[54:49.640 --> 54:54.640]  post it for everybody and listen to these people at the Ohio judges conference
[54:54.640 --> 54:59.640]  that they had talk about how they can screw pro se litigants and stuff and
[54:59.640 --> 55:04.640]  cheat them of their rights, then maybe more people might wake up.
[55:04.640 --> 55:05.640]  Yeah.
[55:05.640 --> 55:06.640]  And that actually happened.
[55:06.640 --> 55:09.640]  I mean, I forgot what year it was, but I mean, they had the judges come to
[55:09.640 --> 55:13.640]  some big conference in Ohio all over the United States and was training them
[55:13.640 --> 55:18.640]  how to circumvent our rights and do it and handle our paperwork and everything.
[55:18.640 --> 55:23.640]  We really need to find out everybody who's been to that conference.
[55:23.640 --> 55:27.640]  Well, I mean, all your major players in the court system have been there and
[55:27.640 --> 55:34.640]  most likely by now have been had other side training deals from their state on
[55:34.640 --> 55:38.640]  the same conference.
[55:38.640 --> 55:48.640]  We need to do a discovery for the judge for all conferences concerning how to
[55:48.640 --> 55:52.640]  screw pro se litigants that he's been to.
[55:52.640 --> 55:58.640]  You know, my judge was a fresh, brand new judge, so he probably hasn't even
[55:58.640 --> 56:01.640]  done anything with yet.
[56:01.640 --> 56:05.640]  But I mean, if you take, personally, I was thinking earlier when you were
[56:05.640 --> 56:10.640]  talking about this, I mean, who's the most responsible judge in our third
[56:10.640 --> 56:14.640]  district, B.B. Schraub?
[56:14.640 --> 56:18.640]  Why don't we go after the head honcho and say, hey, your subordinates are
[56:18.640 --> 56:23.640]  evidently doing what you're allowing the policies to happen.
[56:23.640 --> 56:29.640]  Well, we can't name him, okay, in this district, Travis County and Hays County,
[56:29.640 --> 56:33.640]  B.B. Schraub is the head administrative judge of the district.
[56:33.640 --> 56:39.640]  So if a judge gets a motion to disqualify, it goes to B.B. Schraub and he
[56:39.640 --> 56:43.640]  appoints a judge to hear the motion.
[56:43.640 --> 56:49.640]  But we can't call him respondent superior because the judges are elected.
[56:49.640 --> 56:53.640]  So the elected official is where the buck stops.
[56:53.640 --> 57:00.640]  We can't get past it unless we got Schraub engaging in the same conduct.
[57:00.640 --> 57:04.640]  Then we can go after him directly.
[57:04.640 --> 57:07.640]  I was wondering about that.
[57:07.640 --> 57:10.640]  Yeah, it would be fun to go after the highest judge in the district and let
[57:10.640 --> 57:12.640]  them all know that nobody's immune.
[57:12.640 --> 57:16.640]  Well, you need to tell the audience what happened in my misdemeanor case to
[57:16.640 --> 57:20.640]  how I tried to get the new prosecutor down in Hays County subpoenaed.
[57:20.640 --> 57:25.640]  And because she had done what you just told the people about happening in that
[57:25.640 --> 57:28.640]  other county, she turned around and changed the process.
[57:28.640 --> 57:34.640]  So I subpoenaed her into the misdemeanor case to testify about all these
[57:34.640 --> 57:36.640]  changes she was making.
[57:36.640 --> 57:38.640]  And they fought the subpoena.
[57:38.640 --> 57:42.640]  And then B.B. Schraub had a hearing over it, and he was going to deny my
[57:42.640 --> 57:43.640]  subpoena.
[57:43.640 --> 57:46.640]  And then I said, in other words, you're just going to allow this corruption
[57:46.640 --> 57:48.640]  and everything to keep on going here.
[57:48.640 --> 57:52.640]  And he said, well, if you can explain to me why you need her testimony, then
[57:52.640 --> 57:53.640]  I'll allow it.
[57:53.640 --> 57:54.640]  Well, wait a minute.
[57:54.640 --> 57:58.640]  What Russell really said, so, Judge, does the code of criminal procedure not
[57:58.640 --> 58:00.640]  count in this case?
[58:00.640 --> 58:01.640]  Oh, yeah, that's true.
[58:01.640 --> 58:03.640]  I forgot about that.
[58:03.640 --> 58:07.640]  He kind of crawled right down that judge's throat.
[58:07.640 --> 58:08.640]  I'll hold on.
[58:08.640 --> 58:11.640]  Russell had me cringing.
[58:11.640 --> 58:13.640]  Okay, Russell, do you want to hang on to the other side?
[58:13.640 --> 58:15.640]  Yeah, I'll hold it, hang on for a little bit.
[58:15.640 --> 58:16.640]  Okay, all right.
[58:16.640 --> 58:18.640]  Russell's going to hang on the line.
[58:18.640 --> 58:20.640]  And then we've also got Gail, Dominic, and Rick.
[58:20.640 --> 58:22.640]  Callers, we have one more hour to go.
[58:22.640 --> 58:28.640]  So if you'd like to call in, 512-646-1984.
[58:28.640 --> 58:30.640]  This is the rule of law, Randy Kelton and Deborah Stevens.
[58:30.640 --> 58:32.640]  We'll be right back.
[58:32.640 --> 59:00.640]  MUSIC
[59:00.640 --> 59:02.640]  Radio Frequency ID Chips.
[59:02.640 --> 59:05.640]  These government mandated technologies are being used to violate your privacy,
[59:05.640 --> 59:08.640]  making you vulnerable to identity scalping.
[59:08.640 --> 59:11.640]  Had enough of your tax dollars being used to make you less secure?
[59:11.640 --> 59:13.640]  It's time to send a message to Big Tech.
[59:13.640 --> 59:19.640]  Join the 511 campaign in turning down the part for you in Texas' Minority Report
[59:19.640 --> 59:20.640]  Reality Program.
[59:20.640 --> 59:24.640]  Demand accountability before they get your tax dollars.
[59:24.640 --> 59:28.640]  So pack a lunch and protest against government-sponsored identity and the
[59:28.640 --> 59:32.640]  Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative in Round Rock, Texas, Monday,
[59:32.640 --> 59:37.640]  March 16th from noon to 3 p.m. in front of Identics Incorporated,
[59:37.640 --> 59:42.640]  the state of Texas' biometric contractor, because your identity matters.
[59:42.640 --> 59:51.640]  For more information, visit 511campaign.org or call 512-687-4069.
[59:51.640 --> 01:00:00.640]  MUSIC
[01:00:00.640 --> 01:00:22.640]  MUSIC
[01:00:22.640 --> 01:00:32.640]  MUSIC
[01:00:32.640 --> 01:00:42.640]  MUSIC
[01:00:42.640 --> 01:00:52.640]  MUSIC
[01:00:52.640 --> 01:01:02.640]  MUSIC
[01:01:02.640 --> 01:01:12.640]  MUSIC
[01:01:12.640 --> 01:01:19.640]  MUSIC
[01:01:19.640 --> 01:01:20.640]  Okay, we are back.
[01:01:20.640 --> 01:01:26.640]  The Rule of Law, Randy Kelton and Deborah Stevens here on Rule of Law Radio.
[01:01:26.640 --> 01:01:30.640]  All right, we're speaking with Russell from Texas right now.
[01:01:30.640 --> 01:01:32.640]  Okay, Russell, go ahead.
[01:01:32.640 --> 01:01:35.640]  But anyway, when Randy went down and found out that they had changed the
[01:01:35.640 --> 01:01:40.640]  procedure at the jail, and now all of a sudden they were, you know,
[01:01:40.640 --> 01:01:44.640]  almost three years after them had been arrested, now all of a sudden their
[01:01:44.640 --> 01:01:51.640]  magistrate is forwarding all the documents to the court clerk and sealing
[01:01:51.640 --> 01:01:56.640]  them and all that, then that whole system has been changed down there.
[01:01:56.640 --> 01:02:00.640]  But yet, I brought out, I said, look, okay, for the last 12 years,
[01:02:00.640 --> 01:02:04.640]  every person who's been through this jail has been wronged, done it illegally
[01:02:04.640 --> 01:02:07.640]  against the code, against the statutes.
[01:02:07.640 --> 01:02:11.640]  So, and I said, I'm trying to establish this on record, and they did not want
[01:02:11.640 --> 01:02:16.640]  that on record, and they turned around dismissed by misdemeanors.
[01:02:16.640 --> 01:02:18.640]  They did not want her testified.
[01:02:18.640 --> 01:02:22.640]  Oh, you should have seen, there was an attorney from the attorney general's
[01:02:22.640 --> 01:02:29.640]  office, and he was complaining that Mr. Mortland filed 100-and-something
[01:02:29.640 --> 01:02:32.640]  complaints against us.
[01:02:32.640 --> 01:02:33.640]  And if we could...
[01:02:33.640 --> 01:02:34.640]  Wah!
[01:02:34.640 --> 01:02:38.640]  If we allowed that, what did he say, Russell?
[01:02:38.640 --> 01:02:40.640]  You'd probably...
[01:02:40.640 --> 01:02:44.640]  I mean, I know he complained that if this was true and correct, we would have
[01:02:44.640 --> 01:02:47.640]  to change the entire criminal justice system.
[01:02:47.640 --> 01:02:50.640]  And I thought, well, hell, you're not filing the criminal justice system the
[01:02:50.640 --> 01:02:52.640]  way it's wrote now.
[01:02:52.640 --> 01:02:54.640]  Yeah, and he complained about him doing that.
[01:02:54.640 --> 01:02:59.640]  He said that if he was allowed to file these complaints, it would shut them
[01:02:59.640 --> 01:03:00.640]  down.
[01:03:00.640 --> 01:03:03.640]  And Russell said, your point is?
[01:03:03.640 --> 01:03:08.640]  So, that's, I mean, they've already tried to restrain me bringing this out
[01:03:08.640 --> 01:03:10.640]  into open in Hayes County.
[01:03:10.640 --> 01:03:13.640]  And you could imagine what they've tried to do in other counties.
[01:03:13.640 --> 01:03:17.640]  And once, like when Randy goes in there and he tells them, hey, you're doing
[01:03:17.640 --> 01:03:21.640]  this wrong, you're doing that wrong, and they go in there and the new DA down
[01:03:21.640 --> 01:03:24.640]  there in Hayes County, she wanted to straighten that mess out.
[01:03:24.640 --> 01:03:27.640]  She turns around and straightens it out, but yet she doesn't want to help
[01:03:27.640 --> 01:03:31.640]  anybody that's been illegally prosecuted beforehand.
[01:03:31.640 --> 01:03:32.640]  You know?
[01:03:32.640 --> 01:03:35.640]  But now if you get a court case down in Hayes County, you go through the
[01:03:35.640 --> 01:03:39.640]  Magistration or whatever you want to call it, they will seal the documents and
[01:03:39.640 --> 01:03:42.640]  do all that stuff and forward them to the court clerk.
[01:03:42.640 --> 01:03:45.640]  They didn't do that before for at least 12 years.
[01:03:45.640 --> 01:03:49.640]  And that's my whole case was to the appellate court and the appellate court,
[01:03:49.640 --> 01:03:51.640]  oh, that's meritless.
[01:03:51.640 --> 01:03:52.640]  Oh, it's meritless.
[01:03:52.640 --> 01:03:53.640]  They broke the law.
[01:03:53.640 --> 01:03:55.640]  It's tampering with a government document.
[01:03:55.640 --> 01:03:56.640]  It's a felony.
[01:03:56.640 --> 01:03:58.640]  It's meritless.
[01:03:58.640 --> 01:04:02.640]  And like Randy said, if they'd have ruled in my favor, which they could have
[01:04:02.640 --> 01:04:06.640]  ruled in my favor and then made it unpublished, but my case would have been
[01:04:06.640 --> 01:04:10.640]  over with, but it couldn't have been used as, you know, a catalyst for anybody
[01:04:10.640 --> 01:04:13.640]  else to straighten out their case.
[01:04:13.640 --> 01:04:17.640]  But, I mean, that's why I'm going to keep pushing this case forward until
[01:04:17.640 --> 01:04:22.640]  hell freezes over, until we get a decent response and answer.
[01:04:22.640 --> 01:04:29.640]  Because, you know, I'm not even having to serve my probation until this whole
[01:04:29.640 --> 01:04:31.640]  appeal process is over.
[01:04:31.640 --> 01:04:33.640]  And my probation is supposed to be 10 years.
[01:04:33.640 --> 01:04:39.640]  So I may be tied up in this thing for another 10, 15 years the way it's going.
[01:04:39.640 --> 01:04:42.640]  I don't expect to lose.
[01:04:42.640 --> 01:04:43.640]  Right.
[01:04:43.640 --> 01:04:45.640]  You might change everything.
[01:04:45.640 --> 01:04:50.640]  Because I think if it takes a cesarean to the United States Supreme Court to
[01:04:50.640 --> 01:04:53.640]  settle this matter, then that's where it will be.
[01:04:53.640 --> 01:04:57.640]  And I'm sure the state is not going to want that to happen.
[01:04:57.640 --> 01:05:00.640]  Whatever it takes, you know.
[01:05:00.640 --> 01:05:01.640]  That's what we have to think.
[01:05:01.640 --> 01:05:02.640]  That's how we have to feel.
[01:05:02.640 --> 01:05:04.640]  Whatever it takes.
[01:05:04.640 --> 01:05:05.640]  What was it?
[01:05:05.640 --> 01:05:10.640]  Discarte said nothing can resist the human will that will stake its very
[01:05:10.640 --> 01:05:13.640]  existence upon the extent of its purpose.
[01:05:13.640 --> 01:05:17.640]  I mean, you know, a lot of people have got evidence that they're setting up
[01:05:17.640 --> 01:05:21.640]  concentration camps and all that stuff and got a list of people that speak
[01:05:21.640 --> 01:05:26.640]  out and, you know, they claim if you speak out or you have a different
[01:05:26.640 --> 01:05:30.640]  thought against the government, then you're some kind of terrorist or
[01:05:30.640 --> 01:05:32.640]  whatever and they want to round us all up.
[01:05:32.640 --> 01:05:33.640]  Oh, boy.
[01:05:33.640 --> 01:05:35.640]  Well, I guess they're going to come take us away.
[01:05:35.640 --> 01:05:40.640]  Well, yeah, well, I hope we have a cell together.
[01:05:40.640 --> 01:05:41.640]  I hope not.
[01:05:41.640 --> 01:05:45.640]  I still have this image I'm trying to get out of my mind.
[01:05:45.640 --> 01:05:47.640]  Okay, Randy.
[01:05:47.640 --> 01:05:49.640]  Okay, I'll just listen.
[01:05:49.640 --> 01:05:50.640]  All right, thanks, Russell.
[01:05:50.640 --> 01:05:51.640]  Bye.
[01:05:51.640 --> 01:05:52.640]  Okay.
[01:05:52.640 --> 01:05:53.640]  All right.
[01:05:53.640 --> 01:05:57.640]  We're going to move on now to Dominic in Texas.
[01:05:57.640 --> 01:05:58.640]  Hey, Dominic, thanks for calling in.
[01:05:58.640 --> 01:06:00.640]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:06:00.640 --> 01:06:01.640]  Hey, Deborah.
[01:06:01.640 --> 01:06:02.640]  Hey, Randy.
[01:06:02.640 --> 01:06:03.640]  How are you all doing?
[01:06:03.640 --> 01:06:04.640]  Good.
[01:06:04.640 --> 01:06:09.640]  Well, I had this question because my dog was recently incarcerated
[01:06:09.640 --> 01:06:14.640]  in Town Lake Animal Shelter, and before his release,
[01:06:14.640 --> 01:06:17.640]  they found it absolutely necessary to micro-ship him.
[01:06:17.640 --> 01:06:19.640]  Yeah, I had a feeling you were going to say that.
[01:06:19.640 --> 01:06:24.640]  Yeah, without even trying to coerce a consent out of my wife or anything
[01:06:24.640 --> 01:06:26.640]  when she went to go pick him up.
[01:06:26.640 --> 01:06:27.640]  They just did it?
[01:06:27.640 --> 01:06:30.640]  They just went ahead and did it because I guess they felt it was just that.
[01:06:30.640 --> 01:06:32.640]  They just absolutely had to.
[01:06:32.640 --> 01:06:36.640]  So now that they put themselves in that position,
[01:06:36.640 --> 01:06:40.640]  or like I said, they didn't even try and coerce a consent.
[01:06:40.640 --> 01:06:42.640]  They just went ahead and did it.
[01:06:42.640 --> 01:06:46.640]  Does that put them in any kind of liability now
[01:06:46.640 --> 01:06:49.640]  in case something ever does happen to our pet?
[01:06:49.640 --> 01:06:56.640]  Depends on the statute, the state of the statute in the jurisdiction you're in.
[01:06:56.640 --> 01:06:59.640]  I'm not so sure there's a statute, Randy.
[01:06:59.640 --> 01:07:05.640]  I think this is just like city ordinance that in Austin, in Texas,
[01:07:05.640 --> 01:07:10.640]  here in Austin, if your dog is picked up as a stray,
[01:07:10.640 --> 01:07:13.640]  they will chip it in order for you to get it back.
[01:07:13.640 --> 01:07:16.640]  That's your punishment for letting your dog loose.
[01:07:16.640 --> 01:07:17.640]  It was not a stray.
[01:07:17.640 --> 01:07:19.640]  Yeah, well, that's what I meant.
[01:07:19.640 --> 01:07:23.640]  What they would term a stray is any dog on the loose.
[01:07:23.640 --> 01:07:24.640]  Okay.
[01:07:24.640 --> 01:07:28.640]  Yeah, if your dog is on the loose, they'll chip it,
[01:07:28.640 --> 01:07:29.640]  and that's just the way it is.
[01:07:29.640 --> 01:07:31.640]  And I don't agree with chipping animals at all,
[01:07:31.640 --> 01:07:34.640]  but this isn't a state statute.
[01:07:34.640 --> 01:07:36.640]  This is city ordinance business.
[01:07:36.640 --> 01:07:41.640]  Yeah, but they still fall under sovereign immunity.
[01:07:41.640 --> 01:07:43.640]  I would hope so.
[01:07:43.640 --> 01:07:46.640]  No, you can't sue them.
[01:07:46.640 --> 01:07:51.640]  Well, what I'm saying is I would hope that we could still take it into court
[01:07:51.640 --> 01:07:59.640]  the same way that we would take it into court as if it was a state statute.
[01:07:59.640 --> 01:08:03.640]  That the same rules would apply.
[01:08:03.640 --> 01:08:05.640]  They would still have sovereign immunity.
[01:08:05.640 --> 01:08:09.640]  But what I'm saying is forget suing them.
[01:08:09.640 --> 01:08:11.640]  I mean, is this a criminal activity?
[01:08:11.640 --> 01:08:14.640]  No, not if they have a statute authorizing it.
[01:08:14.640 --> 01:08:16.640]  You mean even though it's a city ordinance?
[01:08:16.640 --> 01:08:17.640]  Right.
[01:08:17.640 --> 01:08:20.640]  The city ordinance would authorize it.
[01:08:20.640 --> 01:08:25.640]  So the city ordinance is just every pet has to be microchipped?
[01:08:25.640 --> 01:08:26.640]  No.
[01:08:26.640 --> 01:08:31.640]  The city ordinance is that if it's a stray and they pick it up, they'll chip it.
[01:08:31.640 --> 01:08:33.640]  But see, that wasn't the case with us.
[01:08:33.640 --> 01:08:38.640]  The thing with my dog, he was on the leash,
[01:08:38.640 --> 01:08:41.640]  and a gentleman walking by stepped on his tail,
[01:08:41.640 --> 01:08:44.640]  so it reacted and it grabbed a hold of his pants.
[01:08:44.640 --> 01:08:48.640]  And since it grabbed a hold of his pants and it scratched him,
[01:08:48.640 --> 01:08:50.640]  they said that they had to pick him up.
[01:08:50.640 --> 01:08:51.640]  Oh.
[01:08:51.640 --> 01:08:52.640]  That's different.
[01:08:52.640 --> 01:08:56.640]  Yeah, he was never on the loose.
[01:08:56.640 --> 01:09:00.640]  He was always on the leash.
[01:09:00.640 --> 01:09:03.640]  Now you have, I'd have to see the statute,
[01:09:03.640 --> 01:09:10.640]  but now it appears as though you have a case.
[01:09:10.640 --> 01:09:12.640]  I have a case anyway.
[01:09:12.640 --> 01:09:16.640]  Well, Randy, yeah, what about the dog that led to death
[01:09:16.640 --> 01:09:20.640]  just because there was a city ordinance out in California,
[01:09:20.640 --> 01:09:24.640]  wherever that was, that said, well, all dogs have to be chipped
[01:09:24.640 --> 01:09:26.640]  and the dog died from it?
[01:09:26.640 --> 01:09:30.640]  I'm sorry, somehow civil immunity doesn't apply there.
[01:09:30.640 --> 01:09:31.640]  Yeah, it does.
[01:09:31.640 --> 01:09:35.640]  Well, you told Catherine Albrecht and everybody on the show that night
[01:09:35.640 --> 01:09:37.640]  that these people could be sued for that.
[01:09:37.640 --> 01:09:43.640]  Well, the only one that could be sued is the one who did the chipping.
[01:09:43.640 --> 01:09:49.640]  If they did something wrong in the chipping.
[01:09:49.640 --> 01:09:53.640]  I thought that you were telling us that the city council itself
[01:09:53.640 --> 01:09:58.640]  could be sued for passing an ordinance that would cause such damage and death.
[01:09:58.640 --> 01:10:00.640]  Maybe.
[01:10:00.640 --> 01:10:07.640]  This is always a real touchy spot.
[01:10:07.640 --> 01:10:14.640]  You could absolutely sue them whether you could get it by or not.
[01:10:14.640 --> 01:10:18.640]  You were saying that what would happen is that not necessarily,
[01:10:18.640 --> 01:10:22.640]  there would be monetary compensation,
[01:10:22.640 --> 01:10:27.640]  but they're not immune from as far as like injunctive relief.
[01:10:27.640 --> 01:10:28.640]  Yeah, okay.
[01:10:28.640 --> 01:10:29.640]  That's what you were saying.
[01:10:29.640 --> 01:10:31.640]  So they can be sued.
[01:10:31.640 --> 01:10:33.640]  They can be sued for injunctive relief.
[01:10:33.640 --> 01:10:34.640]  Okay, right.
[01:10:34.640 --> 01:10:37.640]  Yeah, you can always sue for injunctive relief,
[01:10:37.640 --> 01:10:43.640]  but here there's no injunctive relief to be had.
[01:10:43.640 --> 01:10:46.640]  Because it's too late, the damage is already done.
[01:10:46.640 --> 01:10:49.640]  Right, and they've chipped it.
[01:10:49.640 --> 01:10:54.640]  What you might be able to do is sue to force them to remove it,
[01:10:54.640 --> 01:10:57.640]  which may be worse than putting it in.
[01:10:57.640 --> 01:11:06.640]  But generally, if a municipality or a county or a state has sovereign immunity
[01:11:06.640 --> 01:11:11.640]  from suit, if they're acting within the scope of authority.
[01:11:11.640 --> 01:11:18.640]  So if they've passed a statute that is within the scope of their authority to pass,
[01:11:18.640 --> 01:11:30.640]  and the individual who acts in accordance with that statute does something that causes harm,
[01:11:30.640 --> 01:11:34.640]  he can't be sued because he has qualified immunity,
[01:11:34.640 --> 01:11:39.640]  and the city can't be sued because they have sovereign immunity.
[01:11:39.640 --> 01:11:42.640]  They can't be sued for monetary damages.
[01:11:42.640 --> 01:11:44.640]  Well, Randy, let me ask you something.
[01:11:44.640 --> 01:11:52.640]  If they pass a statute that says all dogs have to be chipped, for example, all right, period, across the board.
[01:11:52.640 --> 01:11:57.640]  All right, so people's dogs are dying left and right, getting cancer left and right,
[01:11:57.640 --> 01:12:00.640]  having all kinds of health problems all over the place,
[01:12:00.640 --> 01:12:06.640]  and they can't be sued because, well, the law said that there's a law that they have to be chipped.
[01:12:06.640 --> 01:12:12.640]  Well, there's also a law that prevents, that makes it a crime of cruelty to animals
[01:12:12.640 --> 01:12:18.640]  and to beat them and inflict harm and injury and death upon them in any way.
[01:12:18.640 --> 01:12:23.640]  So now he's got two conflicting statutes, one that says they're all in the clear
[01:12:23.640 --> 01:12:28.640]  because the law says that they have to be chipped, and so that's the way it is.
[01:12:28.640 --> 01:12:29.640]  You can't sue me.
[01:12:29.640 --> 01:12:35.640]  But then there's also another law that makes it a crime to cause injury or death to an animal.
[01:12:35.640 --> 01:12:36.640]  So now what?
[01:12:36.640 --> 01:12:38.640]  There's no conflict here.
[01:12:38.640 --> 01:12:40.640]  Well, looks like a conflict to me.
[01:12:40.640 --> 01:12:42.640]  So one law has to win out over the other one.
[01:12:42.640 --> 01:12:43.640]  No.
[01:12:43.640 --> 01:12:50.640]  If they're required to put in, if they're authorized by statute to put in the chips,
[01:12:50.640 --> 01:12:57.640]  they must do so in a way that doesn't violate the statute against cruelty to animals.
[01:12:57.640 --> 01:13:04.640]  If they can't do so in a way that doesn't violate the statute against cruelty to animals, they can't do it.
[01:13:04.640 --> 01:13:11.640]  Well, then the answer is they can't do it because they cannot do it without causing harm to the animal, period.
[01:13:11.640 --> 01:13:13.640]  The chip itself is what's causing the harm.
[01:13:13.640 --> 01:13:18.640]  And actually, the process of putting it in is also causing the harm.
[01:13:18.640 --> 01:13:20.640]  The one dog bled to death.
[01:13:20.640 --> 01:13:27.640]  So if you challenge the putting into the chip as cruelty to animals...
[01:13:27.640 --> 01:13:29.640]  Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
[01:13:29.640 --> 01:13:32.640] ...the fact of the ordinance is irrelevant.
[01:13:32.640 --> 01:13:37.640]  Okay, so could Dominic sue them on that, on those grounds there?
[01:13:37.640 --> 01:13:38.640]  Yeah.
[01:13:38.640 --> 01:13:41.640]  They could say, well, as an ordinance, it says I can do it.
[01:13:41.640 --> 01:13:43.640]  Well, sure it does.
[01:13:43.640 --> 01:13:51.640]  But it doesn't say you can inflict, you can be cruel and inflict injury to the animal while you're doing it.
[01:13:51.640 --> 01:13:58.640]  If you can't do it without violating this law, then you are stopped.
[01:13:58.640 --> 01:14:03.640]  That goes to statutory estoppel.
[01:14:03.640 --> 01:14:13.640]  So then I would have to produce like the other cases where the microchip itself has been found to have a cancerous tumor growing on it.
[01:14:13.640 --> 01:14:14.640]  Yeah.
[01:14:14.640 --> 01:14:15.640]  The tissue and all that?
[01:14:15.640 --> 01:14:16.640]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:14:16.640 --> 01:14:21.640]  So if you guys can put that chip in where it causes no harm to my animal...
[01:14:21.640 --> 01:14:25.640]  Yeah, if you can put the chip in without breaking its skin.
[01:14:25.640 --> 01:14:31.640]  In fact, if you can put the chip in without putting it in, then have a good one.
[01:14:31.640 --> 01:14:37.640]  I mean, this may be a way of challenging the statute.
[01:14:37.640 --> 01:14:45.640]  If the statute creates a statutory conflict, then...
[01:14:45.640 --> 01:14:51.640]  Do I have to wait for the cancer or whatever to happen?
[01:14:51.640 --> 01:14:53.640]  No, you can move.
[01:14:53.640 --> 01:14:59.640]  They've already chipped your animal and you have evidence of what it does.
[01:14:59.640 --> 01:15:00.640]  Yeah.
[01:15:00.640 --> 01:15:05.640]  Plus, I'm sure there's a big old scar or scab mark or something where they put it in.
[01:15:05.640 --> 01:15:07.640]  So they've already hurt your animal.
[01:15:07.640 --> 01:15:09.640]  They already broke its skin.
[01:15:09.640 --> 01:15:12.640]  So yeah, you have standing to raise the issue now.
[01:15:12.640 --> 01:15:14.640]  I mean, I'm sure it was quite painful.
[01:15:14.640 --> 01:15:15.640]  Yeah.
[01:15:15.640 --> 01:15:20.640]  So you charge whoever put it in with cruelty to the animal.
[01:15:20.640 --> 01:15:21.640]  There you go.
[01:15:21.640 --> 01:15:26.640]  Yuck, yuck.
[01:15:26.640 --> 01:15:38.640]  And maintain that while it was within the scope of the individual's authority to put in the chip,
[01:15:38.640 --> 01:15:48.640]  it was not within the scope of the authority of the individual to inflict injury on the animal
[01:15:48.640 --> 01:15:51.640]  in the process of doing it.
[01:15:51.640 --> 01:15:52.640]  Right.
[01:15:52.640 --> 01:16:01.640]  So that would be the argument to make is that the statute itself promotes cruelty to animals
[01:16:01.640 --> 01:16:07.640]  and therefore is in conflict with another law and is therefore void.
[01:16:07.640 --> 01:16:13.640]  Yeah, that'd be a great way to get it stuck down.
[01:16:13.640 --> 01:16:15.640]  Okay.
[01:16:15.640 --> 01:16:17.640]  It'd take a lot of research.
[01:16:17.640 --> 01:16:18.640]  Yeah.
[01:16:18.640 --> 01:16:24.640]  Go to Catherine Albrecht's website, CatherineAlbrecht.com, A-L-B-R-E-C-H-T.
[01:16:24.640 --> 01:16:27.640]  You can also go to spychips.com.
[01:16:27.640 --> 01:16:33.640]  There's very good sources of research that has already been done.
[01:16:33.640 --> 01:16:34.640]  All right.
[01:16:34.640 --> 01:16:36.640]  Well, I thank you all very much for your time.
[01:16:36.640 --> 01:16:38.640]  And I'll let the next person go ahead.
[01:16:38.640 --> 01:16:39.640]  All right.
[01:16:39.640 --> 01:16:40.640]  Thank you.
[01:16:40.640 --> 01:16:41.640]  Thank you, Dominic.
[01:16:41.640 --> 01:16:42.640]  You all have a great evening.
[01:16:42.640 --> 01:16:43.640]  All right.
[01:16:43.640 --> 01:16:44.640]  You too.
[01:16:44.640 --> 01:16:45.640]  Bye-bye.
[01:16:45.640 --> 01:16:46.640]  All right.
[01:16:46.640 --> 01:16:47.640]  Thanks.
[01:16:47.640 --> 01:16:51.640]  We've got Gail from Minnesota, Jim from Texas, Rip from California.
[01:16:51.640 --> 01:16:54.640]  This is the rule of law, Rainy Kelton and Deborah Stevens.
[01:16:54.640 --> 01:16:56.640]  We'll be right back.
[01:16:56.640 --> 01:17:02.640]  Are you looking for an investment that has no stock market risk?
[01:17:02.640 --> 01:17:05.640]  Has a 100 percent track record of returning profits?
[01:17:05.640 --> 01:17:10.640]  Is not affected by fluctuations in oil prices and interest rates?
[01:17:10.640 --> 01:17:13.640]  Is publicly traded and SEC regulated?
[01:17:13.640 --> 01:17:17.640]  If this kind of peace of mind is what you have been looking for in an investment,
[01:17:17.640 --> 01:17:20.640]  then life settlements is the investment for you.
[01:17:20.640 --> 01:17:26.640]  Our annual rate of return has been 15.83 percent for the last 17 years.
[01:17:26.640 --> 01:17:30.640]  Our investments are insurance and banking commission regulated.
[01:17:30.640 --> 01:17:34.640]  Our returns are assured by the largest insurance companies.
[01:17:34.640 --> 01:17:40.640]  Even qualified retirement plans such as 401Ks and IRAs are eligible for transfer.
[01:17:40.640 --> 01:17:42.640]  We charge absolutely no commissions.
[01:17:42.640 --> 01:17:45.640]  100 percent of your investment goes to work for you.
[01:17:45.640 --> 01:17:55.640]  Please visit sleepwellinvestment.com or call Bill Schober at 817-975-2431.
[01:17:55.640 --> 01:18:07.640]  That's sleepwellinvestment.com or call 817-975-2431.
[01:18:07.640 --> 01:18:12.640]  Thank you very much.
[01:18:37.640 --> 01:18:42.640]  Thank you very much.
[01:19:07.640 --> 01:19:12.640]  All right.
[01:19:12.640 --> 01:19:13.640]  We're back.
[01:19:13.640 --> 01:19:18.640]  The rule of law, Randy Kelton and Deborah Stevens talking through creation.
[01:19:18.640 --> 01:19:21.640]  The book of life is in our hands.
[01:19:21.640 --> 01:19:22.640]  Okay.
[01:19:22.640 --> 01:19:25.640]  We are going to go now to Rick from California.
[01:19:25.640 --> 01:19:27.640]  He was next on the list.
[01:19:27.640 --> 01:19:28.640]  Hey, Rick.
[01:19:28.640 --> 01:19:29.640]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:19:29.640 --> 01:19:30.640]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:19:30.640 --> 01:19:31.640]  How's it going?
[01:19:31.640 --> 01:19:32.640]  I was going through the freeway.
[01:19:32.640 --> 01:19:33.640]  That's why I kept losing.
[01:19:33.640 --> 01:19:37.640]  That's why I parked today.
[01:19:37.640 --> 01:19:38.640]  Good.
[01:19:38.640 --> 01:19:39.640]  Go ahead.
[01:19:39.640 --> 01:19:40.640]  Okay.
[01:19:40.640 --> 01:19:42.640]  I just thought I got some good news and a question.
[01:19:42.640 --> 01:19:49.640]  Good news is I got a speeding ticket in Los Angeles a while ago going 55 in the 35.
[01:19:49.640 --> 01:19:51.640]  I was going with traffic.
[01:19:51.640 --> 01:19:54.640]  It's not like I was going through school zones and stop signs.
[01:19:54.640 --> 01:20:00.640]  However, I filed a counterclaim against the judge and the city and it got dismissed.
[01:20:00.640 --> 01:20:04.640]  So I'm kind of excited about that because it challenges your jurisdiction and states
[01:20:04.640 --> 01:20:09.640]  that an officer can only stop you if he sees you committing a felony as president or a
[01:20:09.640 --> 01:20:10.640]  warrant of the law.
[01:20:10.640 --> 01:20:12.640]  That's it.
[01:20:12.640 --> 01:20:21.640]  Another thing, my question was I had gotten some officers investigated by internal affairs
[01:20:21.640 --> 01:20:26.640]  for what I accused them of, some of them for going through my pockets without my consent.
[01:20:26.640 --> 01:20:29.640]  I mean, they were just going through my stuff.
[01:20:29.640 --> 01:20:34.640]  So I put sexual harassment and another thing that they broke my window.
[01:20:34.640 --> 01:20:39.640]  Long story short, I filed also for being put in jail for twice.
[01:20:39.640 --> 01:20:45.640]  However, I got a letter from the chief of police and I remember you saying, Lenny, that
[01:20:45.640 --> 01:20:51.640]  once they say that they have not broken any policies or anything, what does that add to
[01:20:51.640 --> 01:20:52.640]  my case if that's true?
[01:20:52.640 --> 01:20:56.640]  Because I read it and I put it on my YouTube stating how, you know...
[01:20:56.640 --> 01:21:01.640]  The chief of police becomes a respondent superior.
[01:21:01.640 --> 01:21:02.640]  Oh, perfect.
[01:21:02.640 --> 01:21:06.640]  They acted in accordance with his directions.
[01:21:06.640 --> 01:21:11.640]  So he conspired with his police officers to commit the criminal acts.
[01:21:11.640 --> 01:21:22.640]  I just got the major here in Austin to tell me that he examined the incident wherein I
[01:21:22.640 --> 01:21:29.640]  was arrested and not charged and he felt his officers acted in accordance with policy.
[01:21:29.640 --> 01:21:31.640]  Good man.
[01:21:31.640 --> 01:21:35.640]  He gave me his hide.
[01:21:35.640 --> 01:21:37.640]  So what will you be filing next now?
[01:21:37.640 --> 01:21:46.640]  I will be filing first degree felony aggravated assault against the major and conspiracy to
[01:21:46.640 --> 01:21:49.640]  commit.
[01:21:49.640 --> 01:21:50.640]  I see.
[01:21:50.640 --> 01:21:51.640]  Kidnapping.
[01:21:51.640 --> 01:21:52.640]  Hold stack.
[01:21:52.640 --> 01:21:57.640]  Ticolo's complaints, he's not going to believe.
[01:21:57.640 --> 01:22:01.640]  Oh, it's going to be glorious.
[01:22:01.640 --> 01:22:05.640]  So you want to play hardball, Bubba?
[01:22:05.640 --> 01:22:07.640]  I'll give you hardball.
[01:22:07.640 --> 01:22:08.640]  Okay.
[01:22:08.640 --> 01:22:11.640]  So I'm going to start...
[01:22:11.640 --> 01:22:12.640]  Okay.
[01:22:12.640 --> 01:22:20.640]  Now you can assume that the chief of police personally did everything that was done to
[01:22:20.640 --> 01:22:21.640]  you.
[01:22:21.640 --> 01:22:22.640]  Okay.
[01:22:22.640 --> 01:22:24.640]  I see what you're saying.
[01:22:24.640 --> 01:22:29.640]  Everything any officer did, they did at the direction of the chief of police.
[01:22:29.640 --> 01:22:30.640]  Perfect.
[01:22:30.640 --> 01:22:32.640]  See how he likes that.
[01:22:32.640 --> 01:22:36.640]  So I'll be filing more complaints on top of what I've already filed.
[01:22:36.640 --> 01:22:37.640]  That's great.
[01:22:37.640 --> 01:22:40.640]  I'll be sending you guys the counterclaim.
[01:22:40.640 --> 01:22:42.640]  It's only four pages long.
[01:22:42.640 --> 01:22:48.640]  Most of the stuff is U.S. code, so hopefully you guys will see and post it up there.
[01:22:48.640 --> 01:22:51.640]  If possible, I'll post it on the website.
[01:22:51.640 --> 01:22:52.640]  Okay, wonderful.
[01:22:52.640 --> 01:22:55.640]  I wanted to say that you guys are doing an awesome job.
[01:22:55.640 --> 01:22:59.640]  I want to thank you guys because, once again, you guys are like the only outlet people that
[01:22:59.640 --> 01:23:04.640]  are defending their rights and trying to make sure that this country stays for the people
[01:23:04.640 --> 01:23:05.640]  by the people.
[01:23:05.640 --> 01:23:06.640]  Well, thank you.
[01:23:06.640 --> 01:23:11.640]  And we'll send you a check for that plug in the morning.
[01:23:11.640 --> 01:23:13.640]  You guys are awesome.
[01:23:13.640 --> 01:23:15.640]  Thank you very much, and you guys have a good night.
[01:23:15.640 --> 01:23:16.640]  I'll be listening.
[01:23:16.640 --> 01:23:17.640]  All right.
[01:23:17.640 --> 01:23:19.640]  Thanks, Rick.
[01:23:19.640 --> 01:23:23.640]  Okay, we're going to go now to Gail in Minnesota.
[01:23:23.640 --> 01:23:24.640]  Hey, Gail, thanks for calling in.
[01:23:24.640 --> 01:23:26.640]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:23:26.640 --> 01:23:28.640]  Hey, how are you guys doing?
[01:23:28.640 --> 01:23:29.640]  Pretty good.
[01:23:29.640 --> 01:23:35.640]  We just went through the first ad hoc committee meeting in Minnesota, maybe the first one
[01:23:35.640 --> 01:23:43.640]  nationally where the citizens had to go and have an ad hoc committee meeting called in
[01:23:43.640 --> 01:23:49.640]  the legislature because both the Senate and the House have individually refused to hear
[01:23:49.640 --> 01:23:55.640]  the criminal complaint of the wrongdoing of the judges and the judicial department state.
[01:23:55.640 --> 01:24:07.640]  So we had a bipartisan both legislative branch meeting today where a few of us ended up testifying
[01:24:07.640 --> 01:24:12.640]  as to things that have been done in cases against us.
[01:24:12.640 --> 01:24:20.640]  So it was pretty exciting but a little scary because I'm hanging out there right now with
[01:24:20.640 --> 01:24:26.640]  pages of complaints against this judge but still the open hound on my case.
[01:24:26.640 --> 01:24:31.640]  So you filed criminal complaints against him and he hasn't disqualified himself?
[01:24:31.640 --> 01:24:34.640]  No, I have not filed criminal complaints against him.
[01:24:34.640 --> 01:24:36.640]  I was with Gail Nathan.
[01:24:36.640 --> 01:24:39.640]  Gail Nathan really doesn't want me to file criminal complaints against him.
[01:24:39.640 --> 01:24:43.640]  So I'm kind of hanging out in the air now not knowing what to do because I know you
[01:24:43.640 --> 01:24:48.640]  recommended filing the criminal complaints and Gail's saying don't file the criminal
[01:24:48.640 --> 01:24:50.640]  complaints and he was kind of...
[01:24:50.640 --> 01:24:52.640]  Who is Gail?
[01:24:52.640 --> 01:24:56.640]  He's the one that wrote that book, Minnesota Injustice, that has a judge in it.
[01:24:56.640 --> 01:24:59.640]  Why is he telling you not to file?
[01:24:59.640 --> 01:25:02.640]  I don't know exactly but...
[01:25:02.640 --> 01:25:05.640]  Maybe he thinks it'll antagonize the judge even more.
[01:25:05.640 --> 01:25:08.640]  I don't know how he could be much more hostile.
[01:25:08.640 --> 01:25:13.640]  I mean that's what is going to get the judges qualified from the case.
[01:25:13.640 --> 01:25:19.640]  That's the only thing I could see that legally would force the judge to stand down from
[01:25:19.640 --> 01:25:20.640]  the case.
[01:25:20.640 --> 01:25:22.640]  I don't understand this.
[01:25:22.640 --> 01:25:26.640]  I mean I have brought it up probably four or five times to him.
[01:25:26.640 --> 01:25:30.640]  I just am chomping into this to do the criminal complaint and it's...
[01:25:30.640 --> 01:25:36.640]  I mean like I don't want to not have him help me because he's a great guy and I'll tell
[01:25:36.640 --> 01:25:42.640]  you what, the third attorney just turned tail on me and he went out withdrawing and this
[01:25:42.640 --> 01:25:44.640]  is another thing I wanted to ask you.
[01:25:44.640 --> 01:25:49.640]  He hasn't withdrawn but what he did is he stopped representing me and I feel that it
[01:25:49.640 --> 01:25:54.640]  particularly happened after the judge yelled at him in open court in November.
[01:25:54.640 --> 01:25:59.640]  The third of November the judge told him to sit down and shut his mouth or he was going
[01:25:59.640 --> 01:26:03.640]  to throw him out of the courtroom and my attorney was...
[01:26:03.640 --> 01:26:08.640]  His whole voice was quivering and shaking so bad after that that he couldn't even hardly
[01:26:08.640 --> 01:26:14.640]  talk and I tried to address it after the pre-trial and the attorney tried to say oh what a great,
[01:26:14.640 --> 01:26:19.640]  you know, how successful we were and I thought what court case were you listening to?
[01:26:19.640 --> 01:26:24.640]  You know and meanwhile after that the attorney just stopped returning my calls.
[01:26:24.640 --> 01:26:27.640]  Pretty much he hasn't even talked to me about the case since this...
[01:26:27.640 --> 01:26:30.640]  Okay, I'll give you a suggestion.
[01:26:30.640 --> 01:26:31.640]  Okay.
[01:26:31.640 --> 01:26:33.640]  Who thinks he's afraid of that judge?
[01:26:33.640 --> 01:26:35.640]  Make him more afraid of you.
[01:26:35.640 --> 01:26:41.640]  Oh, I already wrote him a letter telling, noting, noticing him that he is not my attorney
[01:26:41.640 --> 01:26:47.640]  that because he has constructed on a constructive withdrawal and constructive...
[01:26:47.640 --> 01:26:49.640]  He is no longer my attorney.
[01:26:49.640 --> 01:26:51.640]  No.
[01:26:51.640 --> 01:26:53.640]  He is your attorney.
[01:26:53.640 --> 01:26:55.640]  He's under contract to you.
[01:26:55.640 --> 01:26:56.640]  I know.
[01:26:56.640 --> 01:26:57.640]  Well, I didn't fire him.
[01:26:57.640 --> 01:27:04.640]  Okay, file a bar grievance for every single thing you can think of that he didn't do he
[01:27:04.640 --> 01:27:05.640]  should have done.
[01:27:05.640 --> 01:27:07.640]  One of them is not talking to you.
[01:27:07.640 --> 01:27:10.640]  You can file a bar grievance for that.
[01:27:10.640 --> 01:27:13.640]  You file about a half a dozen bar grievances against him.
[01:27:13.640 --> 01:27:15.640]  He'll stop being an attorney.
[01:27:15.640 --> 01:27:19.640]  He won't have any choice because he can't get malpractice insurance.
[01:27:19.640 --> 01:27:22.640]  But he's under contract to represent you.
[01:27:22.640 --> 01:27:25.640]  I won't put him loose on that.
[01:27:25.640 --> 01:27:26.640]  Pardon me?
[01:27:26.640 --> 01:27:28.640]  I have not cut him loose of the contract.
[01:27:28.640 --> 01:27:29.640]  Good.
[01:27:29.640 --> 01:27:31.640]  Then bind him to the contract.
[01:27:31.640 --> 01:27:33.640]  You start filing the bar grievances.
[01:27:33.640 --> 01:27:39.640]  First thing he's going to do is move to be asked the judge to remove him from the case.
[01:27:39.640 --> 01:27:43.640]  And you tell the judge, don't you dare remove him from that case.
[01:27:43.640 --> 01:27:44.640]  He's my attorney.
[01:27:44.640 --> 01:27:49.640]  I'm under private contract with him, and you are not to interfere with it.
[01:27:49.640 --> 01:27:53.640]  Well, the judge will obviously remove him from the case.
[01:27:53.640 --> 01:27:59.640]  Then you sue the judge, counter sue the judge in the case that's going on.
[01:27:59.640 --> 01:28:05.640]  Well, see, that's one thing that another friend of mine told me to do.
[01:28:05.640 --> 01:28:11.640]  He said, go ahead and let him try to withdraw and let the judge okay it.
[01:28:11.640 --> 01:28:12.640]  And then you go after the judge too.
[01:28:12.640 --> 01:28:14.640]  Exactly.
[01:28:14.640 --> 01:28:22.640]  Interfering with a private contract, the decision to allow the judge to withdraw
[01:28:22.640 --> 01:28:24.640]  is an administrative decision.
[01:28:24.640 --> 01:28:26.640]  It's not a judicial decision.
[01:28:26.640 --> 01:28:30.640]  The judge has no immunity for that.
[01:28:30.640 --> 01:28:32.640]  So sue the judge personally.
[01:28:32.640 --> 01:28:33.640]  Okay.
[01:28:33.640 --> 01:28:43.640]  Do I have to have a waiver of immunity filed first or no?
[01:28:43.640 --> 01:28:44.640]  No.
[01:28:44.640 --> 01:28:46.640]  He doesn't have any immunity.
[01:28:46.640 --> 01:28:47.640]  Okay.
[01:28:47.640 --> 01:28:52.640]  He has immunity for judicial decisions, not for administrative decisions.
[01:28:52.640 --> 01:28:53.640]  Okay.
[01:28:53.640 --> 01:28:56.640]  Let me ask you this thing too.
[01:28:56.640 --> 01:29:01.640]  I went and tried to get transcripts of my case because the judge has been doing
[01:29:01.640 --> 01:29:07.640]  so many things, and when I called the court reporter, the court reporter told me,
[01:29:07.640 --> 01:29:09.640]  first she said how much it was going to be.
[01:29:09.640 --> 01:29:10.640]  She said, well, you know, it's going to be too much.
[01:29:10.640 --> 01:29:11.640]  You can't afford that.
[01:29:11.640 --> 01:29:14.640]  And I said, well, you know, I'm going to need him.
[01:29:14.640 --> 01:29:16.640]  And then she said, well, you're going to have to get two sets.
[01:29:16.640 --> 01:29:19.640]  And I said, well, you know, why do I need to get two?
[01:29:19.640 --> 01:29:22.640]  And she said, well, you have to pay for one to stay at the courthouse,
[01:29:22.640 --> 01:29:24.640]  and then you can pay for your own.
[01:29:24.640 --> 01:29:27.640]  And I totally had the feeling she was trying to just, you know,
[01:29:27.640 --> 01:29:29.640]  totally dissuade me.
[01:29:29.640 --> 01:29:31.640]  And I said, well, you know, I don't want to pay for two,
[01:29:31.640 --> 01:29:34.640]  but you know, I'm still going to need the transcripts.
[01:29:34.640 --> 01:29:35.640]  Okay.
[01:29:35.640 --> 01:29:36.640]  Wait a minute.
[01:29:36.640 --> 01:29:37.640]  Yeah, yeah, yeah.
[01:29:37.640 --> 01:29:38.640]  We're going to break.
[01:29:38.640 --> 01:29:39.640]  Just hold on one second, Gail.
[01:29:39.640 --> 01:29:40.640]  All right?
[01:29:40.640 --> 01:29:41.640]  This doesn't make any sense to me.
[01:29:41.640 --> 01:29:43.640]  I mean, why she should have to pay for one at the courthouse
[01:29:43.640 --> 01:29:44.640]  and one for herself.
[01:29:44.640 --> 01:29:46.640]  I mean, if there was one at the courthouse,
[01:29:46.640 --> 01:29:48.640]  it should be there already.
[01:29:48.640 --> 01:29:51.640]  And then she could just make her own copies or whatever.
[01:29:51.640 --> 01:29:54.640]  We'll hear about more of this on the other side.
[01:29:54.640 --> 01:29:57.640]  We'll be right back.
[01:29:57.640 --> 01:29:59.640]  Gold prices are at historic highs,
[01:29:59.640 --> 01:30:02.640]  and with the recent pullback, this is a great time to buy.
[01:30:02.640 --> 01:30:05.640]  With the value of the dollar, risks of inflation,
[01:30:05.640 --> 01:30:09.640]  geopolitical uncertainties, and instability in world financial systems,
[01:30:09.640 --> 01:30:11.640]  I see gold going up much higher.
[01:30:11.640 --> 01:30:14.640]  Hi, I'm Tim Fry at Roberts and Roberts Brokerage.
[01:30:14.640 --> 01:30:18.640]  Everybody should have some of their assets in investment-grade precious metals.
[01:30:18.640 --> 01:30:21.640]  At Roberts and Roberts Brokerage, you can buy gold, silver, and platinum
[01:30:21.640 --> 01:30:24.640]  with confidence from a brokerage that's specialized
[01:30:24.640 --> 01:30:27.640]  in the precious metals market since 1977.
[01:30:27.640 --> 01:30:30.640]  If you are new to precious metals, we will happily provide you
[01:30:30.640 --> 01:30:33.640]  with the information you need to make an informed decision
[01:30:33.640 --> 01:30:35.640]  whether or not you choose to purchase from us.
[01:30:35.640 --> 01:30:38.640]  Also, Roberts and Roberts Brokerage values your privacy
[01:30:38.640 --> 01:30:41.640]  and will always advise you in the event that we would be required
[01:30:41.640 --> 01:30:43.640]  to report any transaction.
[01:30:43.640 --> 01:30:46.640]  If you have gold, silver, or platinum you'd like to sell,
[01:30:46.640 --> 01:30:48.640]  we can convert it for immediate payment.
[01:30:48.640 --> 01:30:52.640]  Call us at 800-874-9760.
[01:30:52.640 --> 01:30:58.640]  We're Roberts and Roberts Brokerage, 800-874-9760.
[01:30:58.640 --> 01:31:08.640]  I want you to smell it, Jerry. You smell something, too.
[01:31:08.640 --> 01:31:12.640]  Is it miles away? Is it cold?
[01:31:12.640 --> 01:31:17.640]  Yeah, man, I smell something, too. It's just miles away.
[01:31:17.640 --> 01:31:19.640]  Like it's pushing up the nose. It's not on me.
[01:31:19.640 --> 01:31:22.640]  Is there one of y'all? It's the cold shoulder, man.
[01:31:22.640 --> 01:31:25.640]  But, you know, sorry, sorry. My grandpa used to always say,
[01:31:25.640 --> 01:31:28.640]  don't worry, sonny. Let him give it a cold shoulder.
[01:31:28.640 --> 01:31:30.640]  It can't freeze me. I got gold on it.
[01:31:30.640 --> 01:31:33.640]  Brush them off, piece of it, you know?
[01:31:33.640 --> 01:31:36.640]  Come on, Jerry.
[01:31:36.640 --> 01:31:38.640]  Okay, we're back. The rule of law.
[01:31:38.640 --> 01:31:43.640]  Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens here on ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:31:43.640 --> 01:31:45.640]  All right, we're talking with Gayle in Minnesota.
[01:31:45.640 --> 01:31:49.640]  Callers who'd like to call in, 512-646-1984.
[01:31:49.640 --> 01:31:51.640]  We're going to go to Jim from Texas Next.
[01:31:51.640 --> 01:31:56.640]  So at any rate, this court reporter is telling Gayle that
[01:31:56.640 --> 01:32:00.640]  she's got to buy two copies, one for the court and one for herself.
[01:32:00.640 --> 01:32:03.640]  This makes absolutely no sense to me at all because if they were
[01:32:03.640 --> 01:32:06.640]  supposed to be part of court records to begin with,
[01:32:06.640 --> 01:32:08.640]  they would just be part of the court records.
[01:32:08.640 --> 01:32:11.640]  And then if Gayle wanted a copy, she could either go make copies
[01:32:11.640 --> 01:32:15.640]  or sell or look at them or whatever, pay for copies from the court.
[01:32:15.640 --> 01:32:19.640]  I mean, just because she's ordering these transcripts for herself
[01:32:19.640 --> 01:32:23.640]  personally, I don't see why that equals that she has to buy
[01:32:23.640 --> 01:32:26.640]  a copy for the court too.
[01:32:26.640 --> 01:32:31.640]  Gayle, did the court reporter come up with some statute
[01:32:31.640 --> 01:32:33.640]  or court rule to support this?
[01:32:33.640 --> 01:32:34.640]  She did not.
[01:32:34.640 --> 01:32:38.640]  And then she told me when I said I'm going to still need the transcripts,
[01:32:38.640 --> 01:32:46.640]  she said it'll be $5 a page, and it'll probably be at least a few hundred pages.
[01:32:46.640 --> 01:32:52.640]  And when I just said to her, I said, you know, well, that is a lot,
[01:32:52.640 --> 01:32:55.640]  but I don't really have a choice.
[01:32:55.640 --> 01:32:56.640]  I need to get them.
[01:32:56.640 --> 01:33:00.640]  She said, just a minute, you're going to have to hold on here.
[01:33:00.640 --> 01:33:01.640]  She excused herself.
[01:33:01.640 --> 01:33:03.640]  She said, I'll be back in a little bit.
[01:33:03.640 --> 01:33:05.640]  She was gone probably at least six, eight minutes.
[01:33:05.640 --> 01:33:08.640]  At a gut level, she went to the judge.
[01:33:08.640 --> 01:33:13.640]  She came back and said to me, I can't do your transcripts for you
[01:33:13.640 --> 01:33:16.640]  until Judge Spicer authorizes it.
[01:33:16.640 --> 01:33:17.640]  Wow.
[01:33:17.640 --> 01:33:21.640]  I just went sick to my stomach because he's the one the whole thing's about.
[01:33:21.640 --> 01:33:25.640]  I said, she still has not called me back and told me he's authorized.
[01:33:25.640 --> 01:33:27.640]  It's been months.
[01:33:27.640 --> 01:33:30.640]  I thought that these court reporting services were private companies.
[01:33:30.640 --> 01:33:33.640]  They don't need to be authorized by the judge.
[01:33:33.640 --> 01:33:35.640]  They are hired by the judge.
[01:33:35.640 --> 01:33:37.640]  It is totally under the thumb of the judge.
[01:33:37.640 --> 01:33:39.640]  Each court reporter, they are,
[01:33:39.640 --> 01:33:44.640]  as a matter of fact, there have been court reporters here in Minnesota that have admitted to people
[01:33:44.640 --> 01:33:48.640]  that they have removed stuff out of the transcripts by,
[01:33:48.640 --> 01:33:49.640]  because the judge told them to,
[01:33:49.640 --> 01:33:54.640]  but they refuse to do affidavits because their job's on the line.
[01:33:54.640 --> 01:34:00.640]  File criminally against the, you need to look at the law.
[01:34:00.640 --> 01:34:02.640]  She's denying you in a public court.
[01:34:02.640 --> 01:34:04.640]  I would file against the court reporter.
[01:34:04.640 --> 01:34:06.640]  I wouldn't care what the judge said.
[01:34:06.640 --> 01:34:09.640]  And sue the court reporter.
[01:34:09.640 --> 01:34:15.640]  When you countersue in the case against the judge, sue the court reporter.
[01:34:15.640 --> 01:34:17.640]  The court reporter will have a...
[01:34:17.640 --> 01:34:19.640]  Pardon me?
[01:34:19.640 --> 01:34:21.640]  What do you mean when I countersue in the case against the judge?
[01:34:21.640 --> 01:34:24.640]  Okay.
[01:34:24.640 --> 01:34:29.640]  Your countersue, you include, did you originally file the petition in this case?
[01:34:29.640 --> 01:34:31.640]  I filed for legal separation.
[01:34:31.640 --> 01:34:32.640]  Okay.
[01:34:32.640 --> 01:34:33.640]  Then you...
[01:34:33.640 --> 01:34:34.640]  I turned it to a dissolution.
[01:34:34.640 --> 01:34:41.640]  Okay, you file an amended petition and include a suit against the judge and a suit against...
[01:34:41.640 --> 01:34:42.640]  And the one that I...
[01:34:42.640 --> 01:34:43.640]  Okay.
[01:34:43.640 --> 01:34:45.640]  And a suit against the court reporter.
[01:34:45.640 --> 01:34:49.640]  And I do those both into my legal separation petition?
[01:34:49.640 --> 01:34:50.640]  Yeah.
[01:34:50.640 --> 01:34:51.640]  Yes.
[01:34:51.640 --> 01:34:54.640]  Okay, I didn't know I did them right into the same one.
[01:34:54.640 --> 01:34:55.640]  It's a civil action.
[01:34:55.640 --> 01:34:59.640]  You bring all your issues in that civil action.
[01:34:59.640 --> 01:35:01.640]  So you file an amended petition.
[01:35:01.640 --> 01:35:07.640]  Make sure everything you want is in the amended petition because the original petition won't count anymore.
[01:35:07.640 --> 01:35:17.640]  You file an amended petition to include more parties, the judge, the court reporter, and anybody else who's checked around.
[01:35:17.640 --> 01:35:23.640]  If you have prior counsel that you had to get rid of because they didn't do the job, include them.
[01:35:23.640 --> 01:35:27.640]  I have prior counsel that both would do, which was breach of contract.
[01:35:27.640 --> 01:35:32.640]  Sue both of them and do the countersuit against them as well.
[01:35:32.640 --> 01:35:40.640]  And bar grievances against those attorneys for every single issue they didn't address, file a bar grievance against them.
[01:35:40.640 --> 01:35:43.640]  Can't you file a bar grievance against the judge too for all these things?
[01:35:43.640 --> 01:35:45.640]  No, he probably doesn't carry a bar card anymore.
[01:35:45.640 --> 01:35:46.640]  Oh, okay.
[01:35:46.640 --> 01:35:49.640]  You can file a judicial conduct complaint.
[01:35:49.640 --> 01:35:51.640]  It'll appear not to do any good.
[01:35:51.640 --> 01:35:54.640]  If the judge is near to retirement, he may not care.
[01:35:54.640 --> 01:35:57.640]  But if you sue him personally, he'll care about that.
[01:35:57.640 --> 01:35:58.640]  Right.
[01:35:58.640 --> 01:36:02.640]  It's so impossible to get their names, addresses, information like that.
[01:36:02.640 --> 01:36:05.640]  I mean, I'll tell you something else that I'm already dealing with.
[01:36:05.640 --> 01:36:14.640]  I want the first custody evaluation report finally got finished after my husband tried to keep it from getting finished for two and a half years.
[01:36:14.640 --> 01:36:18.640]  She came out saying my husband was a sociopath and that it's hurting my son.
[01:36:18.640 --> 01:36:23.640]  My son is in danger of becoming a sociopath by a 50-50 custody split with my husband.
[01:36:23.640 --> 01:36:26.640]  It finally came out, came out the 2nd of November.
[01:36:26.640 --> 01:36:28.640]  I just had this thought level.
[01:36:28.640 --> 01:36:34.640]  I went and looked up the docket and come to find out the judge, not anyone else, I kept pushing my attorney.
[01:36:34.640 --> 01:36:40.640]  Why aren't we instituting the change in the custody that the custody evaluator recommended?
[01:36:40.640 --> 01:36:43.640]  Well, lo and behold, I mean, this guy stopped talking to me.
[01:36:43.640 --> 01:36:45.640]  It stopped after the judge yelled at him.
[01:36:45.640 --> 01:36:47.640]  So here it is.
[01:36:47.640 --> 01:36:49.640]  It's March now.
[01:36:49.640 --> 01:36:51.640]  I went down to the courthouse.
[01:36:51.640 --> 01:36:53.640]  That thing's never been filed in.
[01:36:53.640 --> 01:36:54.640]  The judge never filed it in.
[01:36:54.640 --> 01:36:56.640]  My attorney never filed it in.
[01:36:56.640 --> 01:37:00.640]  So I went down with Dale Mason and I had Dale file it in.
[01:37:00.640 --> 01:37:01.640]  I drew it up.
[01:37:01.640 --> 01:37:03.640]  Dale went to file it in.
[01:37:03.640 --> 01:37:11.640]  I had two separate documents, so the evaluation and then also the fact sheet that showed that the other two attorneys already had it
[01:37:11.640 --> 01:37:15.640]  in the statement of declaration of service.
[01:37:15.640 --> 01:37:25.640]  And so then a few days later my friend told me, you know, you call back on it and make sure that they put all three of them in separately.
[01:37:25.640 --> 01:37:27.640]  I called back.
[01:37:27.640 --> 01:37:28.640]  Darn, was he right?
[01:37:28.640 --> 01:37:29.640]  No.
[01:37:29.640 --> 01:37:37.640]  All they have on the file is they stepfiled in the statement of service and never included the other two documents that I had as exhibit A and D.
[01:37:37.640 --> 01:37:42.640]  I went back to the courthouse and I said, I want to see the file.
[01:37:42.640 --> 01:37:45.640]  And he said, the file up there, my documents are missing.
[01:37:45.640 --> 01:37:47.640]  I said, well, there they are down there.
[01:37:47.640 --> 01:37:49.640]  And he said, no, you can't see that.
[01:37:49.640 --> 01:37:50.640]  I said, why not?
[01:37:50.640 --> 01:37:51.640]  Well, that's a separate file.
[01:37:51.640 --> 01:37:53.640]  But, you know, and Dale was right there.
[01:37:53.640 --> 01:37:55.640]  I have two witnesses.
[01:37:55.640 --> 01:37:56.640]  I said, well, I want to see those.
[01:37:56.640 --> 01:37:57.640]  I brought them here.
[01:37:57.640 --> 01:37:59.640]  They're supposed to be in the record.
[01:37:59.640 --> 01:38:06.640]  I have the statement of declaration of service right here that, you know, you received them to be filed into the record and they're not in there.
[01:38:06.640 --> 01:38:07.640]  Well, you can't see it.
[01:38:07.640 --> 01:38:08.640]  Well, why not?
[01:38:08.640 --> 01:38:09.640]  Who can see it?
[01:38:09.640 --> 01:38:10.640]  Only the judge can see it.
[01:38:10.640 --> 01:38:13.640]  I mean, so it's like there's a secret file.
[01:38:13.640 --> 01:38:16.640]  File criminal charges against the clerk.
[01:38:16.640 --> 01:38:19.640]  Nobody will give me their names.
[01:38:19.640 --> 01:38:21.640]  Call 911.
[01:38:21.640 --> 01:38:24.640]  Oh, my gosh.
[01:38:24.640 --> 01:38:26.640]  911 works.
[01:38:26.640 --> 01:38:27.640]  Oh, and get this.
[01:38:27.640 --> 01:38:31.640]  We went back down there because I went down to file it in again.
[01:38:31.640 --> 01:38:36.640]  And when I said, well, she told me, well, we're going to have to check and make sure it's okay with the judge.
[01:38:36.640 --> 01:38:40.640]  I went down the next day and she said, those documents are sealed.
[01:38:40.640 --> 01:38:41.640]  I said, who sealed them?
[01:38:41.640 --> 01:38:43.640]  She said, Judge Mayer.
[01:38:43.640 --> 01:38:46.640]  Well, Judge Mayer isn't even the sitting judge on this case.
[01:38:46.640 --> 01:38:47.640]  I said, well, who is he?
[01:38:47.640 --> 01:38:48.640]  He's not on my case.
[01:38:48.640 --> 01:38:52.640]  And she said, well, he sealed them pending Judge Beister coming back.
[01:38:52.640 --> 01:38:53.640]  What?
[01:38:53.640 --> 01:38:54.640]  Yeah.
[01:38:54.640 --> 01:38:57.640]  This is the kind of junk that's going on here, Deb.
[01:38:57.640 --> 01:38:59.640]  And we have to have permission?
[01:38:59.640 --> 01:39:04.640]  The clerk has to have permission from the judge to file something?
[01:39:04.640 --> 01:39:05.640]  That's what they said.
[01:39:05.640 --> 01:39:06.640]  My God.
[01:39:06.640 --> 01:39:12.640]  Look, you've got to stop paying any attention to what public officials tell you.
[01:39:12.640 --> 01:39:15.640]  If they move their mouth, they're lying.
[01:39:15.640 --> 01:39:18.640]  The courts have said they can lie to you.
[01:39:18.640 --> 01:39:21.640]  So if they say anything to you, you have to assume they're lying.
[01:39:21.640 --> 01:39:25.640]  You have to know what their duty is.
[01:39:25.640 --> 01:39:26.640]  Okay.
[01:39:26.640 --> 01:39:27.640]  What does the law say?
[01:39:27.640 --> 01:39:34.640]  And if they do anything that appears to violate the law, just walk out in the hall, find security, say, hey, come here, I need you.
[01:39:34.640 --> 01:39:37.640]  Yeah.
[01:39:37.640 --> 01:39:38.640]  She's violating law.
[01:39:38.640 --> 01:39:41.640]  I need you to take criminal complaints against her.
[01:39:41.640 --> 01:39:47.640]  You should have seen them in Randall County a few weeks ago when I did that up there.
[01:39:47.640 --> 01:39:51.640]  You wouldn't believe the chicken dances that were going on.
[01:39:51.640 --> 01:39:52.640]  Man.
[01:39:52.640 --> 01:39:55.640]  This makes a record.
[01:39:55.640 --> 01:39:56.640]  Well, this is what I wanted.
[01:39:56.640 --> 01:40:00.640]  I mean, if I want to do it right, this judge has got a lot to lose.
[01:40:00.640 --> 01:40:07.640]  And I feel like I've got a target painted all over me from this dude right now, not counting the ones that my husband already has out on me.
[01:40:07.640 --> 01:40:11.640]  And what's really bad is I just found out, I just found documents.
[01:40:11.640 --> 01:40:25.640]  My attorney never even afforded me that when I went to pick up my file from there, I found out that he agreed with the other attorney to allow a second custody evaluation.
[01:40:25.640 --> 01:40:34.640]  Now, mind you, they have had this report for four months saying that it's not in the best interest of my children, that my husband's a sociopath.
[01:40:34.640 --> 01:40:35.640]  Okay.
[01:40:35.640 --> 01:40:36.640]  Wait, wait.
[01:40:36.640 --> 01:40:37.640]  You've been over there.
[01:40:37.640 --> 01:40:40.640]  What did you do to the attorney?
[01:40:40.640 --> 01:40:47.640]  The attorney, all I did to the attorney is I sent him a letter telling him that he had withdrawn counsel.
[01:40:47.640 --> 01:40:51.640]  I mean, in fact, I went down and listed, pointing out a bunch of...
[01:40:51.640 --> 01:40:53.640]  Man, you know, he don't care.
[01:40:53.640 --> 01:40:55.640]  You paid him all your money.
[01:40:55.640 --> 01:40:57.640]  He don't do his job.
[01:40:57.640 --> 01:41:00.640]  He don't care if he's off the case.
[01:41:00.640 --> 01:41:01.640]  What's important?
[01:41:01.640 --> 01:41:02.640]  What's matter to him?
[01:41:02.640 --> 01:41:07.640]  File a bar grievance on him for every single thing you can think of.
[01:41:07.640 --> 01:41:09.640]  Do I do one bar grievance without...
[01:41:09.640 --> 01:41:10.640]  No.
[01:41:10.640 --> 01:41:13.640]  One for each thing you can think of.
[01:41:13.640 --> 01:41:14.640]  Separate bar grievance.
[01:41:14.640 --> 01:41:16.640]  A bunch of separate...
[01:41:16.640 --> 01:41:17.640]  Yeah.
[01:41:17.640 --> 01:41:19.640]  That'll end his career.
[01:41:19.640 --> 01:41:21.640]  He won't be able to get malpractice insurance.
[01:41:21.640 --> 01:41:26.640]  No reputable law firm in the state will hire him.
[01:41:26.640 --> 01:41:29.640]  His career will be ended.
[01:41:29.640 --> 01:41:37.640]  I mean, so anyway, this judge is out there writing another order for a second custody evaluation
[01:41:37.640 --> 01:41:44.640]  that my husband's attorney has on the paper that I have to agree to whatever this...
[01:41:44.640 --> 01:41:46.640]  They picked out the evaluator.
[01:41:46.640 --> 01:41:49.640]  So the first one has never been filed with the court?
[01:41:49.640 --> 01:41:50.640]  That's right.
[01:41:50.640 --> 01:41:52.640]  Man, you got to get rid of that judge.
[01:41:52.640 --> 01:41:56.640]  There is nothing you can do, not anything you can do.
[01:41:56.640 --> 01:41:59.640]  How is she going to get this custody evaluation filed with the court?
[01:41:59.640 --> 01:42:01.640]  How is she going to get that happening?
[01:42:01.640 --> 01:42:04.640]  She's not with that judge there.
[01:42:04.640 --> 01:42:06.640]  How is that happening?
[01:42:06.640 --> 01:42:08.640]  Who is telling you not to go after the judge?
[01:42:08.640 --> 01:42:10.640]  The judge is going to spoon you at every turn.
[01:42:10.640 --> 01:42:15.640]  That's this guy who wrote this book who's telling her not to file criminally against the judge.
[01:42:15.640 --> 01:42:18.640]  I'm starting to wonder if this guy is some kind of government shill.
[01:42:18.640 --> 01:42:23.640]  Maybe this guy who wrote this book works for the judge too.
[01:42:23.640 --> 01:42:26.640]  I mean, this is impossible.
[01:42:26.640 --> 01:42:28.640]  What difference is it ever going to make?
[01:42:28.640 --> 01:42:29.640]  No kidding.
[01:42:29.640 --> 01:42:32.640]  And this guy is telling you not to file criminally against the judge.
[01:42:32.640 --> 01:42:33.640]  This is preposterous.
[01:42:33.640 --> 01:42:35.640]  What more can they do to you?
[01:42:35.640 --> 01:42:37.640]  You got nothing to lose.
[01:42:37.640 --> 01:42:38.640]  No, no.
[01:42:38.640 --> 01:42:42.640]  The only thing left to have to lose is the most important, which is taking my kids away.
[01:42:42.640 --> 01:42:43.640]  You've already lost them.
[01:42:43.640 --> 01:42:45.640]  They're already taking them away.
[01:42:45.640 --> 01:42:48.640]  They ain't coming back to where you're going.
[01:42:48.640 --> 01:42:50.640]  I mean, you're heading over the cliff.
[01:42:50.640 --> 01:42:51.640]  Yeah.
[01:42:51.640 --> 01:42:54.640]  Do I file separate criminal complaints?
[01:42:54.640 --> 01:42:57.640]  A complaint is always one complaint.
[01:42:57.640 --> 01:42:59.640]  You never bunch them together.
[01:42:59.640 --> 01:43:00.640]  Yeah.
[01:43:00.640 --> 01:43:03.640]  Each one is a separate prosecution.
[01:43:03.640 --> 01:43:06.640]  So each one gets filed separately.
[01:43:06.640 --> 01:43:10.640]  So each separate criminal complaint for everything the judge has done.
[01:43:10.640 --> 01:43:11.640]  Yeah.
[01:43:11.640 --> 01:43:12.640]  Yeah.
[01:43:12.640 --> 01:43:17.640]  At the very least, it gets other people looking over his shoulder at it.
[01:43:17.640 --> 01:43:21.640]  And if he's got political enemies out there, they're going to want to see it.
[01:43:21.640 --> 01:43:27.640]  Send your complaints to every politician in the neighborhood.
[01:43:27.640 --> 01:43:33.640]  Send them to every radio station, every TV station.
[01:43:33.640 --> 01:43:34.640]  Okay.
[01:43:34.640 --> 01:43:36.640]  Okay, look, we're going to break.
[01:43:36.640 --> 01:43:37.640]  Okay.
[01:43:37.640 --> 01:43:38.640]  One last question.
[01:43:38.640 --> 01:43:40.640]  Can I ask you during the break or?
[01:43:40.640 --> 01:43:43.640]  Well, we'll get back to you right on the other side of the break.
[01:43:43.640 --> 01:43:45.640]  We'll be right back.
[01:43:45.640 --> 01:43:58.640]  All right, this is rule of law, Rainey Kelton and Deborah Stevens.
[01:43:58.640 --> 01:44:01.640]  Stock markets are taking hit after hit.
[01:44:01.640 --> 01:44:04.640]  Corrupt bankers are choking on subprime debt.
[01:44:04.640 --> 01:44:12.640]  The Fed is busy printing dollars, dollars, and more dollars to bail out Wall Street, banks, and the U.S. car industry.
[01:44:12.640 --> 01:44:21.640]  As investors scramble for safety in the metals in the face of a further devaluation of the dollar, the price of silver will only increase.
[01:44:21.640 --> 01:44:32.640]  Some of the world's leading financial analysts believe that silver is one of the world's most important commodities with unparalleled investment opportunity for the future.
[01:44:32.640 --> 01:44:43.640]  Now is the time to buy silver before it heads for $75 an ounce, and the yellow metal roars back past $1,000 an ounce to new highs.
[01:44:43.640 --> 01:44:59.640]  Call Maximus Holdings now at 407-608-5430 to find out how you can turn your IRA and 401K into a solid investment, silver, without any penalties for early withdrawal.
[01:44:59.640 --> 01:45:04.640]  And if you don't have a retirement account yet, we have fantastic investment opportunities for you.
[01:45:04.640 --> 01:45:33.640]  Call Maximus Holdings at 407-608-5430 for more information.
[01:45:33.640 --> 01:45:38.640]  Okay, we're back. The rule of law, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens.
[01:45:38.640 --> 01:45:43.640]  Okay, how do I get it into a higher court?
[01:45:43.640 --> 01:45:47.640]  You have to appeal. It's not going to help.
[01:45:47.640 --> 01:45:49.640]  I haven't had a ruling, no.
[01:45:49.640 --> 01:45:51.640]  It's not going to help.
[01:45:51.640 --> 01:45:55.640]  So if I file a criminal complaint, will it throw it into an appeal court or no?
[01:45:55.640 --> 01:45:56.640]  No.
[01:45:56.640 --> 01:46:02.640]  What it will do is automatically disqualify the judge from being able to hear the case altogether.
[01:46:02.640 --> 01:46:07.640]  Okay, one thing Dale was worried about was he was afraid I would end up with an even more corrupt judge.
[01:46:07.640 --> 01:46:08.640]  How?
[01:46:08.640 --> 01:46:09.640]  Oh, my God.
[01:46:09.640 --> 01:46:11.640]  Geez, what did we just make?
[01:46:11.640 --> 01:46:15.640]  At this point, what could be worse?
[01:46:15.640 --> 01:46:17.640]  God, I don't know.
[01:46:17.640 --> 01:46:20.640]  I don't like the strategy of this guy, Dale.
[01:46:20.640 --> 01:46:22.640]  I mean, maybe his book is good. I don't know.
[01:46:22.640 --> 01:46:24.640]  I don't know the man. I haven't studied his work.
[01:46:24.640 --> 01:46:32.640]  But this idea of coming from the place of fear and defense, I'm just not really...
[01:46:32.640 --> 01:46:36.640]  I'm not in agreement with it personally.
[01:46:36.640 --> 01:46:40.640]  Everything's going against you.
[01:46:40.640 --> 01:46:42.640]  How's it going to get any worse?
[01:46:42.640 --> 01:46:43.640]  Right.
[01:46:43.640 --> 01:46:50.640]  Can you send me a good copy of a good criminal complaint against the judge and any?
[01:46:50.640 --> 01:46:57.640]  Because I'll tell you, right now, he's going to be getting to me tomorrow this letter he wants me to send to the judge
[01:46:57.640 --> 01:47:02.640]  saying that the attorney is no longer this, that, and wanting the judge to do this and that.
[01:47:02.640 --> 01:47:04.640]  And I'm just like, I don't even want to talk to this judge.
[01:47:04.640 --> 01:47:10.640]  I want him out of here yesterday.
[01:47:10.640 --> 01:47:15.640]  You're going to let this attorney off of his legal hook?
[01:47:15.640 --> 01:47:18.640]  No, because I have not fired him.
[01:47:18.640 --> 01:47:26.640]  It won't matter. If you won't let him represent you, then it's the same thing.
[01:47:26.640 --> 01:47:30.640]  You've released him from the contract.
[01:47:30.640 --> 01:47:37.640]  Yeah, that's another thing I don't get why this guy, Dale, is telling you to let your attorney off the hook
[01:47:37.640 --> 01:47:39.640]  and write a letter to the judge informing him.
[01:47:39.640 --> 01:47:46.640]  So, man, everything this guy is telling you to do is totally backwards from the position that Randy and I take.
[01:47:46.640 --> 01:47:48.640]  Oh, good.
[01:47:48.640 --> 01:47:53.640]  Is there a way I can have him talk with you, Randy, or conference you guys tomorrow or one of you or something?
[01:47:53.640 --> 01:48:00.640]  Because, I mean, this thing is breathing down my neck.
[01:48:00.640 --> 01:48:05.640]  Yes, if he's willing to talk to me, I'll be glad to talk to him.
[01:48:05.640 --> 01:48:09.640]  Okay, what number do I have him get or do you want to call me tomorrow?
[01:48:09.640 --> 01:48:13.640]  Send me an email and I'll give you my phone number.
[01:48:13.640 --> 01:48:14.640]  Okay.
[01:48:14.640 --> 01:48:15.640]  Okay, Gail.
[01:48:15.640 --> 01:48:17.640]  I'll send you one tonight. I will send you one tonight.
[01:48:17.640 --> 01:48:18.640]  Good, okay.
[01:48:18.640 --> 01:48:19.640]  All right, thanks, Gail.
[01:48:19.640 --> 01:48:20.640]  God bless you guys.
[01:48:20.640 --> 01:48:23.640]  Okay, bless you. All right.
[01:48:23.640 --> 01:48:24.640]  Keep swimming. Bye-bye.
[01:48:24.640 --> 01:48:30.640]  Thanks. All right, yeah, I don't agree with this defensive position deal.
[01:48:30.640 --> 01:48:33.640]  We're already cow-towing to these people enough as it is.
[01:48:33.640 --> 01:48:38.640]  All right, let's go to Jim in Texas. Jim, thanks for calling in. What's on your mind tonight?
[01:48:38.640 --> 01:48:48.640]  Hey, I was doing some research and Randy had made a comment yesterday evening about a term that the district attorney
[01:48:48.640 --> 01:48:52.640]  or somebody used that was called magistrised or magistr-
[01:48:52.640 --> 01:48:54.640]  Magistration.
[01:48:54.640 --> 01:49:00.640]  Magistrised. I found the case that it came from.
[01:49:00.640 --> 01:49:01.640]  Okay.
[01:49:01.640 --> 01:49:04.640]  I've seen a number. There's a number of those cases that mention it.
[01:49:04.640 --> 01:49:05.640]  Uh-huh.
[01:49:05.640 --> 01:49:09.640]  But they're BS. I've got about four or five of them.
[01:49:09.640 --> 01:49:13.640]  Texas Criminal Court of Appeals, 1974.
[01:49:13.640 --> 01:49:19.640]  Yeah, it's one of those that's- okay, here's what happened.
[01:49:19.640 --> 01:49:24.640]  Somebody raised an issue of no criminal complaint in the court record.
[01:49:24.640 --> 01:49:25.640]  Right.
[01:49:25.640 --> 01:49:30.640]  And the Court of Appeals looked at the jurisdiction.
[01:49:30.640 --> 01:49:36.640]  And they said, okay, jurisdiction flows from the arresting officer, gives a complaint to the magistrate.
[01:49:36.640 --> 01:49:44.640]  Magistrate does an examination trial, and then the magistrate sends the complaint to the clerk of the court.
[01:49:44.640 --> 01:49:48.640]  The magistrate sends a complaint to the clerk of the- oops.
[01:49:48.640 --> 01:49:50.640]  Holy crap.
[01:49:50.640 --> 01:49:54.640]  We lost jurisdiction, so how do we fix this?
[01:49:54.640 --> 01:50:00.640]  If we rule on this, that they lost jurisdiction, we flush the jails.
[01:50:00.640 --> 01:50:08.640]  So they ruled that the magistrate has jurisdiction until indictment.
[01:50:08.640 --> 01:50:13.640]  So what if a mayor does the examining trial?
[01:50:13.640 --> 01:50:19.640]  Does the mayor have judicial authority to act until indictment?
[01:50:19.640 --> 01:50:26.640]  A magistrate has no jurisdiction to do anything but an examining trial.
[01:50:26.640 --> 01:50:30.640]  Those cases are bogus. There's about four of them.
[01:50:30.640 --> 01:50:35.640]  Well, this one I found on Lois Law.
[01:50:35.640 --> 01:50:37.640]  Which one is it? Let me see if-
[01:50:37.640 --> 01:50:43.640]  It's Watson versus State, and it's in footnote four.
[01:50:43.640 --> 01:50:46.640]  What's the citation on it?
[01:50:46.640 --> 01:50:54.640]  The citation is 762, Southwest, second, 591.
[01:50:54.640 --> 01:50:55.640]  591.
[01:50:55.640 --> 01:50:57.640]  It's Texas-
[01:50:57.640 --> 01:50:59.640]  Yeah, that's the right time frame.
[01:50:59.640 --> 01:51:00.640]  1888.
[01:51:00.640 --> 01:51:02.640]  Okay, I bet I've got that one.
[01:51:02.640 --> 01:51:15.640]  And I mean, this one, it goes through and explains their opinion of it, basically that the arraignment is as it's described in the statute.
[01:51:15.640 --> 01:51:18.640]  It is for a felony, and I called you on this one time.
[01:51:18.640 --> 01:51:24.640]  It stated that 2601 and arraignment takes place.
[01:51:24.640 --> 01:51:29.640]  But it's only for a felony or a jail time misdemeanor.
[01:51:29.640 --> 01:51:44.640]  But then it goes through and it says that it's very specific that the statutory arraignment in Texas is to be distinguished from the procedure prescribed in Article 15.17.
[01:51:44.640 --> 01:51:53.640]  And the use of the term arraignment for the latter purposes is misleading, whether correct or not.
[01:51:53.640 --> 01:52:08.640]  The term magistrised or magistrated have come into common vogue in the Texas legal world to describe the Article 15.17 procedure.
[01:52:08.640 --> 01:52:27.640]  The only case law on Article 15.17 is a case that, see, Chapter 15 is, if you go back and look at the heading of the chapter, it's arrest on warrant.
[01:52:27.640 --> 01:52:29.640]  Right, arrest under warrant.
[01:52:29.640 --> 01:52:40.640]  Now, 14.17 references 15.17, I mean, sorry, 14.06 references 15.17, but it references the warnings in 15.17.
[01:52:40.640 --> 01:52:41.640]  Uh-huh.
[01:52:41.640 --> 01:52:48.640]  There's massive case law that goes to Chapter 16, a whole chapter.
[01:52:48.640 --> 01:52:49.640]  Right.
[01:52:49.640 --> 01:52:53.640]  The judges were ignoring that.
[01:52:53.640 --> 01:52:58.640]  They were going to great lengths to find a way around Chapter 16.
[01:52:58.640 --> 01:53:00.640]  Well, and I agree with that.
[01:53:00.640 --> 01:53:12.640]  And my thing is, is even though this case states that it's different from an arraignment, the qualifications for a legal arraignment are still the same.
[01:53:12.640 --> 01:53:13.640]  Right.
[01:53:13.640 --> 01:53:23.640]  And when a district attorney or assistant district attorney or whoever holds an arraignment, he is still violated, whether they call it something.
[01:53:23.640 --> 01:53:24.640]  Oh, yeah.
[01:53:24.640 --> 01:53:26.640]  Okay, now I see where you're going.
[01:53:26.640 --> 01:53:28.640]  The paperwork states that it's an arraignment.
[01:53:28.640 --> 01:53:42.640]  When they send you a notice that you have to appear for an arraignment, now, I mean, if the traffic officer gives you a ticket and it doesn't say for an arraignment, it says you have to appear before a magistrate.
[01:53:42.640 --> 01:53:44.640]  Yeah, that's for an examining trial.
[01:53:44.640 --> 01:53:52.640]  Right, which they could call if they wanted to a magistration or whatever, but it is an examining trial.
[01:53:52.640 --> 01:53:59.640]  But an arraignment, when they specifically state that you have to be there for an arraignment.
[01:53:59.640 --> 01:54:02.640]  Then they exercise an authority they do not have.
[01:54:02.640 --> 01:54:03.640]  Absolutely.
[01:54:03.640 --> 01:54:05.640]  And that's what my complaints went to.
[01:54:05.640 --> 01:54:07.640]  But when you said that, I had never seen that word.
[01:54:07.640 --> 01:54:15.640]  And when I was looking up, I found this through the attorney general's opinion where he quoted.
[01:54:15.640 --> 01:54:17.640]  Yeah, I've got five or six of them.
[01:54:17.640 --> 01:54:26.640]  And my county attorney put me on to the first one, and then I pulled him out and looked at him and told him, this is hogwash.
[01:54:26.640 --> 01:54:30.640]  This is crap they made up to try to hide their problem.
[01:54:30.640 --> 01:54:36.640]  Well, this is basically, this came from the case, the case that it goes through is when a guy was arrested.
[01:54:36.640 --> 01:54:45.640]  And one of the officers said he was arraigned at a certain time, and they went back and forth, and that's when they came up with this decision.
[01:54:45.640 --> 01:54:54.640]  But I mean, it didn't make one bit of difference to what my case was and my charges against them were.
[01:54:54.640 --> 01:55:02.640]  But it was very interesting to see how they tried to get around what they call an arraignment or something else.
[01:55:02.640 --> 01:55:13.640]  And I agree with this case that an arraignment is, and it specifically states, you know, for a criminal felony or a jail time misdemeanor.
[01:55:13.640 --> 01:55:19.640]  Yeah, and all an arraignment is is a hearing for the purpose of determining the identity of the accused and taking a plea.
[01:55:19.640 --> 01:55:21.640]  That's it.
[01:55:21.640 --> 01:55:23.640]  But it can only be held by certain people.
[01:55:23.640 --> 01:55:24.640]  Right.
[01:55:24.640 --> 01:55:27.640]  And that's where I got them.
[01:55:27.640 --> 01:55:28.640]  Good.
[01:55:28.640 --> 01:55:46.640]  Anyway, this was very good, and because I was looking for the person, and it does specifically state that a justice of the peace cannot hold an arraignment, not in this case, but in the attorney general's opinion.
[01:55:46.640 --> 01:55:48.640]  I think I sent it to you.
[01:55:48.640 --> 01:55:49.640]  Yeah, you did. I've got it.
[01:55:49.640 --> 01:56:00.640]  And and I was looking up the cases based off of that, and that's where I found this, and I was surprised to see the magistrates magistrates, which I've never heard of the word.
[01:56:00.640 --> 01:56:01.640]  Yeah, I said it last night.
[01:56:01.640 --> 01:56:02.640]  Yeah, I'm magistration.
[01:56:02.640 --> 01:56:05.640]  I'm trying to get those cases overturned.
[01:56:05.640 --> 01:56:06.640]  Mm hmm.
[01:56:06.640 --> 01:56:08.640]  Well, and they need to be.
[01:56:08.640 --> 01:56:13.640]  I mean, the statutory language, it says, is what holds now.
[01:56:13.640 --> 01:56:18.640]  They need to change the wording if they're going to do something, but they need to do it by statute.
[01:56:18.640 --> 01:56:20.640]  Yeah, they were they were doing in those cases.
[01:56:20.640 --> 01:56:22.640]  They were all double speak.
[01:56:22.640 --> 01:56:23.640]  Mm hmm.
[01:56:23.640 --> 01:56:28.640]  They were just making up stuff to try to cover their legal behinds.
[01:56:28.640 --> 01:56:36.640]  Well, this one says whether correct or not, the term magistrates are magistrated have come into common use.
[01:56:36.640 --> 01:56:40.640]  Well, I mean, in the law, it has to be correct.
[01:56:40.640 --> 01:56:41.640]  It can't be or not.
[01:56:41.640 --> 01:56:42.640]  Exactly.
[01:56:42.640 --> 01:56:51.640]  And then I've got the law that well, actually, I've got it from American Jurisprudence that even because something comes into use,
[01:56:51.640 --> 01:56:56.640]  it takes on the appearance of law, but never takes on the authority of law.
[01:56:56.640 --> 01:56:57.640]  It's still a pillar of law.
[01:56:57.640 --> 01:56:58.640]  Right.
[01:56:58.640 --> 01:57:00.640]  Right, exactly.
[01:57:00.640 --> 01:57:01.640]  All right.
[01:57:01.640 --> 01:57:02.640]  Well, that was what I had.
[01:57:02.640 --> 01:57:08.640]  And also my case, I found that in the suit against the government officials,
[01:57:08.640 --> 01:57:18.640]  it's the ultra virus act that the ultra virus acts that they do that there are no immunities for.
[01:57:18.640 --> 01:57:19.640]  Yes.
[01:57:19.640 --> 01:57:22.640]  For our listeners, define ultra virus.
[01:57:22.640 --> 01:57:24.640]  Well, I just read it.
[01:57:24.640 --> 01:57:26.640]  They have no jurisdiction.
[01:57:26.640 --> 01:57:30.640]  Ultra virus means that they're exercising.
[01:57:30.640 --> 01:57:33.640]  It generally goes to a contract.
[01:57:33.640 --> 01:57:37.640]  Is there exercising something that's beyond the scope of the contract?
[01:57:37.640 --> 01:57:38.640]  Right.
[01:57:38.640 --> 01:57:43.640]  And ultra virus here means beyond the scope of their authorities.
[01:57:43.640 --> 01:57:45.640]  Ultra means outside.
[01:57:45.640 --> 01:57:46.640]  Right.
[01:57:46.640 --> 01:57:52.640]  And when they do that, they have no immunity, and that's the Texas causes of action.
[01:57:52.640 --> 01:57:54.640]  Suits against the government.
[01:57:54.640 --> 01:57:59.640]  So it is like the lady before me with the judge.
[01:57:59.640 --> 01:58:02.640]  I mean, what they're doing, they have no immunity for.
[01:58:02.640 --> 01:58:03.640]  Exactly.
[01:58:03.640 --> 01:58:04.640]  And if she starts nailing...
[01:58:04.640 --> 01:58:07.640]  Why she won't file criminal charges?
[01:58:07.640 --> 01:58:08.640]  Yeah.
[01:58:08.640 --> 01:58:14.640]  That, Gail, is the, her, she's the one that turns at my heart more than any other.
[01:58:14.640 --> 01:58:16.640]  It frightens me more than any other caller.
[01:58:16.640 --> 01:58:18.640]  She needs to think about it seriously.
[01:58:18.640 --> 01:58:19.640]  Yeah.
[01:58:19.640 --> 01:58:20.640]  So, all right, thanks.
[01:58:20.640 --> 01:58:21.640]  Okay.
[01:58:21.640 --> 01:58:22.640]  And thank you for calling.
[01:58:22.640 --> 01:58:23.640]  All right.
[01:58:23.640 --> 01:58:24.640]  Thank you for calling.
[01:58:24.640 --> 01:58:25.640]  I'm sorry, listeners and callers.
[01:58:25.640 --> 01:58:26.640]  We're at the end of the show.
[01:58:26.640 --> 01:58:29.640]  We still had Jerry, Stephen, Eddie had called back in.
[01:58:29.640 --> 01:58:32.640]  We'll have to speak with you all on Monday night.
[01:58:32.640 --> 01:58:33.640]  All right.
[01:58:33.640 --> 01:58:36.640]  This is the rule of law, Randy Kelton and Deborah Stevens.
[01:58:36.640 --> 01:58:38.640]  Do some research over the weekend.
[01:58:38.640 --> 01:58:39.640]  All right.
[01:58:39.640 --> 01:59:07.640]  We'll be back on Monday evening.
[01:59:07.640 --> 01:59:34.640]  We'll be back on Monday evening.
[01:59:37.640 --> 01:59:55.640]  Thank you.