Rule of Law Radio Archive Search Engine

And I asked the county clerk for proof of the lien with wet ink and written signature on it

ThinkProgress says top Cheney aide David Addington typed a substitute signature line

We request that you obtain the signature of the clerk of the court on the original and

There's no signature on it.

was completely adulterated and their signatures in some cases were forged or the 302 statements

uh... signature and a date and a time on here so that i can prove i filed it

a double oh five authorizes him to release you on your signature

And the other thing along the idea of signatures, since we're on that topic for the moment,

Your signature has a value, and if you have an attorney, or you have a CPA, or you have

signature.

Your signature has a value.

If they want your signature badly, that means they're getting something of value for you

Make sure you understand what you're getting in return for that signature.

Yeah, which is going to require her signature on a piece of paper saying that the records pursuant to your request are not found.

They don't sign it, so there is no signature on the complaint.

Well, in the file itself, the citation is there, but there is no signature one way or

Place for a notary signature

The note, where are the original signatures

Signature saying that's signed by an official notary

So they can trust the signature that's on the document to be the signature of the actual

for a Chinese businessman to verify a signature on a document coming from the United States.

And so that's why I'm urging everybody, do me a favor, stick it in your signature bar.

You know, in your signature line, we've had a couple of people do that just in the last few days.

But you know, put it in your signature, make it your home page, add it to your tool bar,

One of the things I wanted to ask you, there's a thing called digital signatures

I could see a paper that had the signature of my husband's attorney there.

But when you scan it, it does give off a unique signature

That is the one with the wet ink signature.

Wet ink signature.

one requires a wet ink signature.

and that wedding signature was part of it, and part of it selling the note.

signatures from the original mortgage as evidence that whoever's trying to foreclose on you

If you have the original signature note, that is the debt.

But the point being that if that note, the original wet ink signature note, is destroyed, that debt is gone.

And I don't see any signature on this thing from any attorney.

You have no signatures on any of their documents whatsoever to show that you're a business?

I filed documentation with them in writing to withdraw my signature

They're going to double the number of signatures that you have to get in order to get your proposal or proposition on the ballot

To see if I've got that set up correctly, the only thing I'm not sure of is about the signature blocks

And I asked the prosecutor to verify my signature and he said he couldn't do that

Well, she may be able to delegate that signature

There's no signature from the owner of the vehicle, just, just some guy dropped it off

It says signature R.A. Mitchell for Sandra Havilland.

Well, okay, you can't have a signature for somebody else if the first person doesn't exist.

Now, Russell, your document there, does it look like a signature,

Yeah, but Randy, he may have signed something and had a stamp made out of his signature.

Signature R.A. Mitchell for Sandra Pavelin, title bankruptcy specialist, Austin, Texas,

Well, that's interesting because I suspect nobody wants their signature on it

They won't realize it until they see the signature at the bottom.

We have clear evidence that U.S. attorneys keep a stamp of the foreman's signature on it.

And I've already, and I've seen quite a few different ones of different people, friends of mine, that have had the same signature.

I'm going to do a research on how many signatures in this county are that signature.

It will take the wedding signature.

signature and so what they do is they say I'll take 3% and they'll stamp their

your signature they do not loan you anything people I've been finding that

So if he had to go to a magistrate to get his signature verified, then there would be no purpose in passing an ordinance or statute that allows him to release you on your own recognizance

Clearly, it very clearly states that the officer can only release you on your signature after arrest

we're looking forward to the governor's signature on that.

You do have a movement in New York City where they have enough signatures to get

they need to get another 30,000 signatures.

They have enough signatures already to get this on the ballot.

I think it was something like 35,000 signatures would get it before the City Council.

30,000 signatures to get this special prosecutor

and they just turn around and use a stamp to stamp her signature on anything.

So – but if she's still working for them and they're using her signature,

So with this new signature, through Bank of America, through the loan modification,

In other words, that wet signature would not be available to me if I requested it.

because they have to present the wet ink signature note according to the federal rules of evidence,

You want their signature.

I said, but excuse me, I said, then why would you need my signature then

May your signature never smudge

Right below your signature

He can file an amended tax return and it doesn't have to change anything just resubmit the signature with this under threat of duress under the signature

If you get an assessment with no signature it's not valid

Right underneath your signature you can also do it with an attached affidavit but I would still write it beneath my signature

I would write under threat of duress beneath my signature

Because some instruments can be converted to a negotiable instrument by signature alone and so on and so forth.

And my first question is, would you consider your signature to be private property?

Your signature has value associated with it, does it not?

Okay. So if you were to cite a section of law that would claim that your signature is your own private property, where would you find that?

I mean, your signature is, in legal terms, the way you identify yourself on paper.

A signature is private property to be given on a voluntary basis without threats, duress, or coercion.

How do we get to your signature being used by the bank for fraud?

You create the money with your signature.

That money didn't exist until they monetized your signature.

I've read several where they've got a loan canceled based on that argument alone that the bank never gave value for the signature

It's on the back of your signature card, the part you're never allowed to make a copy of and take with you.

The back of that signature card contains a whole lot of information that does not give you full disclosure.

You are not given the opportunity to review the information that is contained on the back of that signature card before you sign it.

That's the signature card.

That piece of paper is what's granting them the authority to use your signature like they are.

Well, also by signing that signature card, you're authorizing them to use your signature,

Well, Eddie, couldn't you just look at the signature card and memorize what's on it and say, I've got to go now.

I mean, how much information is on the back of that signature card?

That signature card used to be the size of a five by seven index card when they first started doing this.

On the bottom of my signature card, I put all rights reserved, UCC 1-207.

The very next day, I got a call from the account manager saying that I had to come in and do a new signature card.

How are you dictating to me what the contents of my signature can be?

I am not going to alter my signature.

And you will accept my signature as I have stated on this card.

They'll close the account for you because that UCC takes away everything on the back of that signature card.

So I guess with that particular statement on the back of the signature card, the answer to your question would be, yeah.

And while I understand that, like with what I was talking about with the signature,

cases themselves but the simplicity of it is this if if his signature was good

and accepted for that waiver then the circuit Clark's signature had to be good

a motion to revoke your signature on the plea agreement claim ineffective

Without a wedding signature contract showing that you have an agreement with the purchaser

The person borrowing the money supposedly, which we all know isn't real money, it's just credit generated on signature

because the bank put up no money of any kind, and it was not until they purchased the borrower's signature that that money or slash credit

They've gone ahead and done what they've done, which they have a special privilege via the Federal Reserve System to create credit on your signature

I don't know where I get the credit. My credit is my signature because I'm promising to pay

Plus, you would also at that point have to establish an account at the bank and fill out a signature card

And on the back of the signature card, it specifically tells you that you are now agreeing to numerous other rules and regulations

They monetize the debts, and it's our signature that creates the supposed money

and then he collects your signature on that ticket and releases you,

but they haven't been able to prove anything with any signature and they don't really have a claim.

They didn't sign it, they only left me for a signature, don't have at least three days

will they not have consent of some sort from him, a signature of some sort?

I received about 1,700 total signatures on my petition and got to my magic number which

in College Station was only 850 signatures of registered voters.

Now do you have to get a certain number of additional signatures in order to force them

No, I have the needed number of signatures right now.

with the few as 850 signatures, you could propose an ordinance and get it on the ballot.

You know, that's not a lot of signatures.

need to get that judge's signature and then it's my turn and that'll be a lot of fun and

But to arrest you simply because you will not sign when these are the only two times when a signature for a notice to appear is mandatory

It's not the signature that's mandatory

See, that's why I have a problem with that particular interpretation of it. It's simply because here we're saying that that one is a penal offense and one isn't and yet they're both mandatory to collect that signature and let them go

And they made a comment about the signature whether the signature was property your signature and you quoted a case that states that the signature was property

And that your signature was property Yeah I've actually read a case where the court determined that the use of a person's signature is a use of a person's private property

Because that signature is unique even though their name itself may not be unique the signature generated by that person in their handwriting is unique

Does that mean that they got a lien on my signature? Question number one are you a taxpayer? No I'm not that's a whole other story but I've been fighting that one for a long time

Well if you'll look though they're going to refer to that as tangible property your signature is not tangible property as long as it's in your possession because only you can generate it

You know there's a fee for it Well your signature as the artwork has no actual value it may impart value to something else but the signature has no value

Do they have something with a signature of the principal on it showing that they are agent?

And then on the bottom of the signature line, I said I put the word agent,

Return signature requested.

signatures and all that kind of stuff.

I had him send it, certified mail return signature requested overnight to the

I made up the complaint, gave it to her, and she verified my signature on it, and the lieutenant was standing behind her, never said a word,

And what I did was I signed it all rights reserved, no signature of my name or anything.

returns signature request, the motions to have it moved,

because we went ahead and had it filed through the post office and had a return signature request.

signature.

wedding signature mortgage note, have you tried to either through discovery or other

If they don't have that wedding signature note, they don't have standing to invoke

The only way the petitioner can establish standing is a wedding signature note.

A photocopy of the wedding signature note is evidence that a wedding signature note

exists, but it is not the wedding signature note.

The principal is the one holding the wedding signature note.

Ohio, 70 cases, the court threw them out because the lender could not produce the wet ink signature

signature note or I will throw you out.

and rescission of the signature,

And anytime you sign your signature anywhere, any singular time, you should always be reserving your rights,

I mean, this gets rid of, the signature alone gets rid of hospital bills, all kinds of things.

Well, we're reserving our rights now, and it's retro, back to that inception of the signature.

Now, how does your blue ink signature appear on papers that you sign when you're signing it?

I'm not revoking the signatures on that.

I've still got those contracts, but I'm revoking all contingent contracts based on my signatures with those.

And your notice to cease and desist, tell them, you know, by the way, you're bonding my signature without full disclosure.

He completely revoked his signature on all contracts.

you should always reserve your rights with your signature each time after you have made

trading it on Wall Street there is some profit going on it is your signature you are not

Okay how does it they all start through your signature everything starts through your signature

into these contracts by virtue of your signature and only with the contract itself where the

Signature of Arresting Officer.

His signature on anything.

no signature on it. I just complained this is not admissible. I don't see how they can

Well but my understanding Randy, if it's a government record with no signature, no seal,

There's one signature from the defendant attorney who's not me.

I'll show up, signature of defendant slash attorney.

It's got some signature on there.

It needs to be millions to petition Congress basically to flood them, inundate them, blizzard them with signatures that we at least need to have a third option to stay in our own homes.

And it's also known that U.S. Attorneys have a stamp with the Foreman's signature on it.

with the principal, a wet ink signature contract with the principal, an original, not a copy.

signature contract.

didn't have a case number on it, had no signature on it, had the wrong name handwritten on it,

not a date on it, no signature, no case number, nothing.

They got Governor Rick Perry's signature on falsified documentation.

U.S. attorneys have stamps made up with the foreman's signature on it

and often stamp documents with the foreman's signature without the foreman's knowledge.

over 52,000 signatures, and they only needed something like, I believe, 26, I believe.

I'm sorry, I may have the 30,000. They needed 30,000 signatures.

And so now they're having to go back and go over every signature

the entire monetary system and monetizing people's signatures. Randy, tell our listeners

All they needed was the signature, right?

All they wanted was the signature and a living, breathing body. Who knows, we might even be

Yeah, and the reason for that is because when you give them your signature on that piece

exchange anyway. They have already been paid when you give them your signature. You don't

owe them anything after that point. It's an even trade. You've sold them your signature

saying this is not speculation or theory. Go look it up yourself, Signature Bank. I'm

Now that checkbooking entry, that money is technically yours created by your signature.

In the market, people apply speculative values to that because it all goes back to the signature.

the signature, and they turn it into some kind of a securities instrument on its face.

that they have to have X percentage of reserves in comparison to how many signatures they

one set of signatures on the document.

that all you need is one signature on the document, but there is a lady out there named

You understand this, Randy, that the funds are created at the signature point.

the mortgage are created on the signature.

They're not existing until the signature is done on the loan and therefore the bank in

the time of your signature.

they've already monetized your signature when you sign that note before the funds get deposited

signature and the purpose of the loan.

You want to look up monetizing signatures and mortgages?

Signature bank.

the banks can't produce the original wet ink signature note in court, which they are required

You don't get standing on prima facie, you get standing on wet ink signature document.

signatures out of the borrower and the lender.

liability because there is no one that has agreed to any term because there's no signature

It's just the borrower's signature.

Now, if they do not have the wet signature document, does that not constitute fraud?

Where they don't have the wet signature document, but they can draw a line to it

know, signatures aren't notarized.

time and trouble to find the customer and get the customer's signature on the bottom

Now they get his signature.

In your experience, how many of these mortgage companies have the actual real wet signature

But most likely the wedding signature documents in China and this mortgage company is going

We really need that wedding signature document.

the what signature document and that nobody has claimed to the property, therefore it's

So the man holding the wedding signature note, he's the principal.

So I'm thinking about going after an angle of, well, it doesn't match the signature on

Have it notarized your signature.

As a first-time homebuyer, what do you think of putting all rights reserved above your signature

Now, what you were asking about going in and putting that above or below your signature,

so you may be able to just do it with one signature.

and put that check under a microscope and look at the signature line that you sign on,

and I actually did write that across my signature, and they still accepted the application,

but $100,000 line of credit on a signature only.

I mean, do they have to send the note in, the original signature note,

Whoever the, quote, borrower is, is the only signature.

and why if there's only one signature that means it's now a securities instrument?

it's almost impossible to get the actual wet ink signature instrument back.

and you have what's called a medallion signature guarantee stamp

So you get a medallion signature guarantee on it,

and benefit it without your signature or authorization.

Nothing else just a regular signature on the in back

On back endorse it on the right hand as a normal check regular signature

Send registered mail with electronic signature confirmation requested or

Under the contract we signed with our signature and social security number per services or whatever

That's how this the end of it is. So there isn't actually just signing your signature as normal

You sign your signature up, you know between your printed name and regards

Yes, and it actually came out of the same court that told us it was too close to the election to reprint all the ballots even though we got enough signatures

Now if he went through all the loopholes and everything like that, and he had, I think, if he had another 10,000 signatures over what he did

Which would amount to 110,000 signatures just to participate in this, he would still only get a third of the funding

Now, H.R. 1207 was gaining some 5 to 10 co-sponsors, 5 to 10 signatures out of however many people in Congress I forget

But the House side is approaching such a crucial mark that, you know, we need eight more signatures

When your signature is what creates the credit in the first place,

The ones in Ohio against Countrywide, the judge said, you don't have a wedding signature contract.

Which only can happen with the president's signature

all rights reserved above my signature on the one ticket.

And of course, he didn't even let me complete my signature on the other ticket.

I mean, how are they going to tell you what to write with your signature? It's your signature.

and one for allegedly speeding, I put under UTDC and All Rights Reserve printed above my signature on the first ticket.

And then it has a photocopied signature of a municipal court judge, which I cannot read, dated 9-5-09.

And he threatened like I said before he threatened to arrest me because because of the verbiage I had put above the signature on the one ticket and started to do on the other ticket and he actually forcibly remove my the pen from my hand.

I mean, it is a wet ink signature and it's in black.

Wait, wait, wait. What do you mean wet ink signature? What is the signature?

Let's sort of monetize that signature.

and that's signed with my regular signature, and since that doesn't match what's on the citation,

Well, the problem is what name is on the driver's license other than your signature?

Oh, okay. Just forgot the copyright, just the fact that the signatures don't match.

In order for you to have true, equitable title, you must have the original wet ink signature document, which you will not have.

That requires the signatures of 2 percent of all registered Republicans in Connecticut.

because signatures do get tossed arbitrarily.

The deadline is 63 days before the primary, so you have 42 days to get 20,000 signatures in Connecticut,

And now apparently they've conceded the number of valid signatures.

And under New York law you need 30,000 petition signatures and the legally valid petition for the city council to consider the measure and vote on it or they can choose not to vote on it.

Here the city, we submitted the signatures and the city clerk said we were 4,000 short out of 52,000.

They found us to have only 26,000 signatures.

And what we asked for was to have a referee appointed to allow us to do a recount and prove that we had indeed met the 30,000 signature level.

We submitted our papers with 7,000 plus signatures that we said were valid.

We conceded you had the 30,000 valid signatures.

And I think they were impressed with the work, the great work that Ted and the volunteers did in collecting these signatures.

So under New York law now to bypass the city council if you can submit another 15,000 valid signatures,

So we submitted another 28,000 approximately signatures and the clerk was sitting on it all this time.

And today we just learned that they're conceding essentially those 15,000 signatures as well.

and didn't raise an issue on the second set of signatures.

When someone comes in and hands me 70,000 signatures,

Well, so now they've conceded that there are enough signatures.

they've conceded that there are enough signatures there as well?

They conceded on the 30,000 signatures initially, and just today they conceded on the 15,000.

And looking over this document, it appears that at least the objection by the clerk to the number of signatures was frivolous.

There was some back and forth, and now apparently they've conceded the number of valid signatures,

And under New York law, you need 30,000 petition signatures and a legally valid petition

Here, the city, we submitted the signatures, and the city clerk said we were 4,000 short.

Out of 52,000, they found us to have only 26,000 signatures.

and prove that we had indeed met the 30,000 signature level.

We submitted our papers with 7,000-plus signatures that we said were valid,

We conceded you had the 30,000 valid signatures.

that Ted and the volunteers did in collecting these signatures.

A 671-page bill of particulars that you all compiled to back up the 7,000 signatures.

if you can submit another 15,000 valid signatures,

So we submitted another 28,000 approximately signatures,

and today we just learned that they're conceding essentially those 15,000 signatures as well.

and didn't raise an issue on the second set of signatures.

When someone comes in and hands me 70,000 signatures,

Well, so now they've conceded that there are enough signatures.

they've conceded that there are enough signatures there as well?

On the number of votes, yes. They conceded on the 30,000 signatures initially, and just today they conceded on the 15,000.

And looking over this document, it appears that at least the objection by the clerk to the number of signatures was frivolous and for the purpose of delay.

You have the original wet ink signature note in your hand and I've defaulted on it, can you foreclose?

Then the name of the affiant was added and the signature was added to that affidavit

Right, an affidavit that was notarized with blank lines be filled in for the affiant name and for their signature and date

Neither will the monthly statements have any kind of signature on there showing that those are the copies that the affidavit made in support of their claim

me with the wedding signature of the contract, certified under the penalties of perjury by

will accept this alleged debt provided you provide me with the wedding signature.

and it says underneath the signature line,

under the signature line says circuit court judge slash circuit court commissioner,

they provide me with a wedding signature of the contract that I signed, that they verify

with the wet ink signature, certified through perjury by the custodian of account. That�s

When you signed that signature,

when you signed your signature on that note,

because you exchanged your signature,

And yes, people, your signature is really worth that much

And like I said, this thing's like a warrant and the officer's initial – I mean, his signature should be – the cop's signature should be on something in this magistrate, on something in this thing, but I don't see it.

On your signature, promise to appear.

A police officer can release you on your signature for a misdemeanor

Yeah, they just monetize your signature.

Now, here's the other thing. Since we've been Agenda 21 and even we have discussed the credit card issue requiring the wedding signature,

where is the contract, produce the wedding signature, show me where I agreed to any of this, why won't this work here?

College Station and began collecting signatures for an ordinance initiative as we have the

It did not have a judge's signature and I sent a copy of that plus the papers that I furnished into the court with the timestamp on it.

There's nothing there, but the magistrate, not even the bonding document has his signature.

She is the Bureau of Driver Licensing Director that has her electronic signature on it.

We only need 30 signatures, that's not that much to go for

And it has to be over your signature, and it has to be notarized.

Somehow you integrate the criminal complaint, the statement of probable cause and the notarized signature and the whole thing in an affidavit or some sort of motion.

nobody to notarize the signature.

I want to see the signature on the envelope on the seal.

And he's got his type signature, but he's never really signed it.

dealing with the documentation that you're putting your signatures on, one of those documents

Yeah, the receipt shows that you've already given them something of value, your signature.

not loaning you any money. They're monetizing your signature. Actually, you're the one that's

monetizing the debt and they're monetizing your signature. You've already given them

because they're selling these notes as well as taking the monetized signature

You admit to your signature by resending.

It's an element of signature, so you go after them for fraud and the inducement.

says that, then the written document with the signature on that warranty will stand

Those are printed on the card and there's a space for a signature.

Now, the signature, when you look at signatures, it's not the pen and ink on the paper.

Signature, that's evidence of a signature.

When you look at pen and ink on a paper, that's evidence of a signature.

The signature is the act that causes the pen to move over the paper and leave that evidence,

So when a person signs that card to accept that card and hold that card, a signature

Yes, hi y'all, it seems to me that when the IRS Title 266065 requiring a signature under

The clerks. They come from the city without a signature.

They set a court date for him without a signature, and he answered it,

that he needed to signature some kind of authority.

the property are redrawn without your permission or consent or signature or anything after

it's his signature and then some of the guy's signature no date no notary and there's another

And the cops arrested me because of the way I was signing my signature

The holder-in-due courses take good title unless there is a so-called real defense, such as a lack of capacity or fraud in the factum, a forged signature

There was no signature.

Wait, I've got an email here or a Skype here about they must show a signature for the exact charges.

Is this or is this not your signature on the card?

look, you better send me back something under signature certified, period, which is the records.

They actually put a signature on this.

where fraudulent signatures were put on the HUD documents.

on a federal government document, false signatures applied.

here right quick to you on the back of the ticket here. It says, sign on the signature

of it. You guys have probably seen these computer-generated tickets. Your signature is not on it. You

don't get a copy of your signature. He don't have a signature anyway. He was writing without

prejudice and then going to sign his signature and the cop jerked it out of his hand before

signature on it they don't give you that you don't take that and if they say well

It only needs the President's signature to become law.

It only needs the President's signature to become law.

by notarizing a signature of someone who's not showing them an ID or someone who cannot

no signature, it wasn't signed

no date, no signature

he just found a form and signed it and put his signature on it and sent it

His name was daniel oland tree. He was he was the guy who signed on the line where it said notary signature

You signed it by mistake and rescind your signature and demand that they prove up their charges.

went in on Friday and accused him in court of forging signatures and fraud and all sorts of

I was disappointed to find that a signature card is a binding contract in Texas.

Yeah, but there's one problem with that signature card.

The signature card contains a lot of undisclosed statements,

he saw my UCC1S308 above my signature on the registration card and there's no commercial

debris of the World Trade Center, as well as the chemical signatures of such a type

as well as the forensic evidence which has found explosives in the debris of the World Trade Center as well as the chemical signatures of such a type of reaction

Contracting requires two knowing signatures and full disclosure.

what you want to do is immediately demand a copy with the stamp on it or the signature

only needs to be one signatory because, consequent to his signature, the state renders to him

They let him out on a signature immediately.

If these documents change hands a number of times, you wind up getting so many signatures on it

You don't have room to put any more signatures

So if that happens, then they attach a document to it with the signature on it and that document is the allonge

that in the front of this book there is a signature sheet

It was using a motion for a more definite statement with a connection to asking for a signature on the application

It's just unruly documents by imposters that purport themselves to be agents of the commission that have no oath of office, no date, no signature, no notary.

She's got, uh, her signature forged on IRS tax returns and a number of other forgery.

At least seven or eight forgeries of my signature.

and please don't sign it because the US attorney has a stamp of your signature on it

has to wait three days because you have three days in which to send your signature on a

And I had the case dismissed because they didn't show an application signature

But made them provide the application signature

If they had admitted that there was no signature, then he could dismiss with prejudice

And this time they actually bring the signature

Well what this does is the complaint itself, the complaint doesn't have to be signed under oath, all it has to do is be signed by the cop's signature

That's the person whose signature is on the complaint.

Did they use a stamp of her signature or some other electronic reproduction?

And the officer was not authorized to release us on our signature for the purpose of appearing

He was by statute authorized to release us on our signature to appear before a magistrate.

First I got his signature inside, and then I got a second chance to ask him.

Did you get that notice I sent you the other day about the signatures in PACER?

Electronic signatures are an issue on PACER documents, the judges, the notary stamps are

signature.

They're doing electronic filings and according to the rules, or excuse me, electronic signatures

and according to the rules, it's supposed to be a visible signature.

Every other time a notary just notarizes a signature

And he wrote the word refused on the signature line in two places, which I didn't refuse to sign it.

Your signature is considered your personal property.

around the signature line above it for the city of and the city and then by and the person's

signature. And now take this as well you completed the contract for the city and now go put a

owns the car and see that if there was any consent, any signature, any...

signature was on there.

They were supposed to look for a signature that matches the title.

There was no power returning with my signature.

There are two signatures of ammonium nitrate fuel oil, one flames, which there were none

And the other signature is nitrate gas.

does it actually have signatures on it?

I've got my signature on it.

Yeah, but your signature is not an admission.

Texas, but in Virginia there's no signature but your own.

And the fact that your signature is on the citation has nothing to do with anything,

because your signature is not an omission of guilt.

then you want to test the sufficiency of the instrument without a signature.

The fact that your signature's on it will not amount to testimony,

so there was not actually a signature on there, there was just a stamp on there, and neither

The signature may be obtained on a duplicate form or on an electronic device capable of

because I was putting the initials for that coercion address and the signature.

That's why I always put that on there before I do my signature.

The progressive change campaign committee and moveon.org have collected 140,000 signatures

It's a private contract, red signatures the whole nine yards.

a rubber stamp with the foreman's signature on it.

of the grand jury's foreman's signature?

Because I tell you what, I would never let anyone make a stamp out of my signature.

And if I found out that anybody had lifted my signature and made a stamp out of it

I want him to initial it because the U.S. attorney has a signature,

for someone to make a stamp out of your signature without your knowledge

Yeah, I try not to, the only way I want the judge to figure out that my motion was not written by an attorney is when he gets to the bottom of it, it's got my signature on it and not the attorney's signature.

only way you're going to get out of here is to get your photo and your signature.

You want to see all the signatures on the note and all the lounges attached to the note.

I'm going to try to set up a website or something where we can collect signatures for petitions

because the U.S. attorney has a stamp with his signature on it.

my motion for 30 days and then the next day the judge's signature was on it on the next

an extension for 30 days and so how did she go ahead and deny that when your signature

The judge, is it actually the judge's signature?

Yes, it's the actual, not on the court record but it is the actual judge's signature with

Well, if it's the judge's signature, then are you saying that the clerk forged the judge's

signature?

If the judge's signature was on it on the 24th.

Well, but it had the judge's signature on it.

So the judge's signature was on the 25th.

I called them, and I said, you have a warrant with the judge's signature on it, and they

Well then it's not your signature.

If they really want to put you in the signature of a social worker, and they can put you in

to disqualification of the test and invalidation of your signature on whatever document you

actually have a signature from that, the clerk, the supervisor, the clerk that said, um, you

With a notification that you are rescinding any and all signatures

Oh, by the way, I did go out and I pounded the streets and I got a petition going and I got over 50 signatures against this.

and he's looking for 20,000, a petition for 20,000, I guess, signatures,

It is supposed to be signed and verified with the signature and verification signature of two public officials or the public official

It's got the stamp on it where it says, presiding judge. It's blank, and the date is blank. All it has is my daughter's signature and date on it.

And once I got it home, I realized that was a good thing because it's certified to be true, a correct copy, but there's no judge's signature and no date.

I would want to see the signature of both or whoever was on the deed,

and if I didn't see the signature relinquishing the property

Okay, now, if you have not divested yourself of this license, rescinded the signatures on the document itself that you used to obtain said license, you have not divested yourself of these things.

and you can't have any documents with your signature notarized unless you can produce

don't have my signature on any of the deed of trust that was sold, only my ex-wife, and

I don't have to get signatures.

Ask him not to sign it as the US attorney has a stamp with his signature on it.

And that's the end of it other than the signature block and so on and so forth.

started collecting signatures

My goal was maybe I could get 100 signatures

we had enough signatures to submit the petition

We sent out a letter, and we've got right now about 12,500 verifiable signatures, and

voters, and once we get all these signatures, we're going to take them to the city, we're

going to have a big signature gathering on July the 4th, there's a fireworks display

because unless you get a signature from someone authorized to represent the bank,

back of it other than my signature.

Out of UCC Article 3, Section 3-204, Subsection A, endorsement means a signature other than

But regardless of the intent of the signer, a signature and its accompanying words is

an endorsement unless the accompanying words, terms of the instrument, place of the signature,

or other circumstances unambiguously indicate that the signature was made for a purpose

For the purpose of determining whether a signature is made on an instrument, a paper affixed

try to make you sign these signature cards to see, you know, for matching up the endorsement.

If at that point in time on the signature card you could sign your name and then have

signature card.

I went in, I filled out the signature card, and I put on the signature card without prejudice

UCC 1-207 underneath the signature.

fill out a new signature card, and I said, why?

He said, because we can't accept a signature card that's made like this.

And I said, since when does the bank have the right to tell me what my signature can

He goes, well, I just can't, we just can't let you have an account with a signature card

That is my signature.

You have no authority or right to tell me what my signature is or is not under any law.

Therefore, you shall not touch my signature, nor in any way alter it upon that card.

I never heard from him again, and I got it in as a part of my signature.

You have to put those words, or whatever your disclaimer is, as part of your signature as

your official endorsement on the signature card when you open the account.

with the bank signature card.

If you read the back of the signature card, the signature card itself is telling you you

What if somebody never signs the signature card to begin with, then what?

Now had you filled out a signature card with the bank like that, then they couldn't make

You have to do it on the signature card as part of your authorized official endorsement

on record, on file, on the signature card with the bank.

If you sign your signature card in a certain way and then you try to add additional words

But if you put those words as part of your endorsement on the official signature card

performance bond, or payment bond generated from my signature upon this citation.

saying you can't bring in the original wedding signature document, you can't show standing.

There's only one signature on each page.

The treasurer can then appoint the secretary as well if they need to have two signatures on it for protection.

notary's signature was made, that the notary who notarized the document actually

I was just wondering, don't I have to get an order from the judge with his signature

The hot topic was, show me the note, where's that wet ink signature?

which requires a signature-bind notary and a notarial seal.

Notice that every single criminal complaint in Texas ends, other than the signature block,

what if the creditor sends you copies of the receipts from the stores with your signature on it?

People, they'll ask you in a courtroom, is this your signature?

I don't know if it's my signature.

it was not uncommon for them to copy people's signatures

Signature loans, okay, might be seven years.

Affirmation is signature.

Okay, because I've got all their signatures on those documents.

Signature by the red X.

wow, we don't have enough qualifying signatures here,

They come up with different counts for the amount of signatures that they should have,

or do you have to turn over like all the original signatures?

Then if there were any issues with signature validation, we'd have to go purchase a database of voters

from the Secretary of State's office, and then we would have to validate the signatures.

We had proved that we collected enough signatures, but the trial ran so long, you know, that, I mean,

I mean, if they are required to verify the petitions and verify the signatures by a certain date and they did not do that,

signature, initials, seal, date, that's it.

in the body of the warrant or in connection with his signature. Now they repealed that,

have the information on him right now, but I do believe he is a signature on A&E 9-11.

The prosecutor just made a rubber stamp off of the grand jury foreman's signature

and the prosecutor's just stamping all these pages of indictments with the grand jury foreman's signature.

The page, it's a one page, 8.5 by 11, with no seal, no signature.

them notarize your signature on the criminal complaint all that's required is that it be

from a uh a sworn signature and the other one yes from well but see the charge itself is what

to this matter well I would just love for them to say it's your signature on your driver's license

The sign and signature block will be there on the very back for the proofs of service.

Did you get the wedding signature note back with all the elonges on it?

You could file a complaint with a police officer and he could verify your signature

Affirmation means signature

and then only a signature of some unknown person sworn before the clerk.

The signature does not match the name of the officer on the citation, so I'm guessing it

and when I said the signature is my property,

and my signature is my property, even though it's on their paper.

I can't read the signature very well, but then I realized, well, if I search through the staff directory,

It's senior deputy court clerk's signature.

and then I'm ready to sign my signature and the lady stops me and says,

you can't sign it that way and I always put a caveat with my signature.

and I sign my signature a certain way every time

and I said, well, you asked me for a signature and that's what I'm putting

and I said, you don't have the authority to tell me or prescribe what my signature is.

That's it. So you don't want my legal signature. You want my name.

to prohibit me from exercising my right to display my lawful signature?

Well, I was prohibited from signing my legal signature.

And if there is no statute or internal rule regarding that particular usage of your signature, they have no leg to stand on.

And he discussed the various statements that people write below their signature on documents.

but he recommended that agencies not accept those signatures with the caveats underneath the signature.

Regardless of that, there's no stamp and signature certifying it as being originated within the court, is there?

Then you keep your receipt where you paid for it and the green receipt that comes back with the signature

show tonight so we'll say the mortgage, your signature, is securitization and I can prove

even the guy's signature and he told the judge it wasn't his signature, that he didn't sign

enough signatures or something, it was just a railroad job from top to bottom, but at

And I said, well, I said, sir, I said, that's not my signature on there.

It doesn't have my signature on it.

And where the signature is, they're just an X.

Well, not the original with all the West signatures,

If they start it, then that's when I present the motions to compel them to see the – not the copies, but the wedding signature papers that my parents made to make them prove up that they are indeed the ones that should be collecting this money and try to, you know, go from that point.

copying and pasting signatures and stuff to different docs.

On his settlement statement, you can see where the signature was whited out.

The clerk's signature, there's some question about the propriety of that

The note, which I'm claiming, it's fraudulent, and it's not my signature because they've

Because the moment it arrives in their hands, there is no signature required to take receipt

Affirmation is your signature.

and get signatures demanding that that limitation be removed.

because you're not going to get many signatures and support that way.

Do you know how many citizens, how many signatures I need to get to make an impact or where I could?

Affirmation is signing your signature.

And a dispense with the necessity of a notary having to come and verify her signature.

They just sent it regular mail, not signature cert or proof of delivery, and then it never

able to know that I had a notice to appear because it was never signature certified.

In searching one of the signatures or names of the so-called employees

Affirmation in law means signature.

Do not sign it as the U.S. attorney has a stamp with your signature on it

through rapidly. You look down at the bottom, there's a notary's signature and so forth, and

They'll just make a statement and they'll list a whole lot of things and then the notary comes in and witnesses their signature and signs off.

If I had access to my files here, I could show you a pile of them that the jurat just merely says John Doe appeared before me on this day such and such and I witnessed his signature and they sign off.

I was pointing out, the affidavits with no signatures, the notary, that affidavit of

the document, obvious forgeries of signatures it goes on.

yeah you're right it is in 14.06 they do both they order them to bring you before a magistrate but if it is a misdemeanor they can release you on your signature

Is it the officer's signature that's on the criminal complaint or have you even seen that?

That hole in that concrete wall, that was a signature hole.

because that's got your personal signature on it.

federal means by agreement where is the power in the federal system our signature they use our

signature as the blackjack against us they use our consent and they bully their way into our consent

it's limited commercially that commercial consent comes effectively through our signature

Your signature is affirmation, the notary stamp is verification

officer's signature on that complaint.

So he didn't have enough time to get the 1,500 signatures to get on the ballot,

If they come in with a wedding signature note, now we want them to prove that that's the only one.

For initials and not for their signature stamp or all that bull crud that they go around

and the handwritten one with the judge's signature was different

did, and I think I have it all put together now. The lender secures your signature on a security

number of different signature styles. And that she was the president of 20 some odd banks.

and then he transposed that signature onto a document that says,

When they collected your signature on that electronic pad

and did not inform you how that signature was to be used

That has their signature of consent, basically. You're entering into a contract, which we

And you can't really claim duress either unless there was a weapon involved when the signature was taking place.

is it a joint account where both of your signatures have to be on a check in order for the money to be able to withdraw?

Okay, so what I'm saying is if one of you all wanted to write a check, do both signatures have to be on the check or could either signature be on the check?

I cannot remove money from the account without her signature.

in order to get their signature on a check to withdraw money,

And your signature was put on that piece of paper, correct?

Were you told what your signature was going to be placed on?

Did they tell you that placing your signature on that pad would be reproduced on some document?

falsely captured your signature for the purpose of creating falsified documentation using your identity.

She got an email with copies of her yearbook with signatures on it,

She had received an email from someone, and copies of her yearbook were included in it with the signatures,

All there was was his name stamped in the signature area and a date stamped.

And if you did line through it, then they would not accept your signature on it anyway.

signature on the deal.

on a digital pad, and it transcribed his signature onto the copy of the citation that the police

Now, the copy that he got for his possession, for his court records, have no signature either

take that electronic signature and they stamp it on all kinds of paperwork you've never

have my signature or my attorney's signature on it.

and I've got four signatures signed on behalf of Capital One Bank, USA, NA.

And all these signatures are notarized and signed on the same day, four of them on behalf

Who came in and put their signature on there that said you're guilty of not displaying

I refiled and the judge's signature is there.

and then you also have to show them the declaration of trust, the short form trust document instrument with whatever trustee's signature on it

And what's interesting about this summons is that it has the court clerk's signature and also has a raised seal over her signature.

signature on paperwork you've never seen with a set of circumstances and decisions you didn't

It takes your signature and stamps it onto documentation that you were completely unaware of

They both deal with an arrest for the purpose of issuing a citation, getting a signature

Whoever made... You need to know whose signatures on that complaint and file aggravated perjury

because they will take your signature and put it wherever they want and like eddie you

that clerk's signature on that complaint.

As far as the person's signature and the period of the contract, it doesn't fall under the statute of fraud.

give them to a private investigator and have him check the signatures on them

and you find that the signatures are not who they said they are,

They get the note. They get your signature on the note. That's what they need.

Once they get your signature on the note, then they promptly sell it,

She found this signature on these documents. The name was Linda Green.

The pro-labor coalition We Are Ohio delivered nearly 1.3 million signatures Wednesday to

it on the November 8 ballot. The signatures were delivered to the Secretary of State's

Now, could your signature be the thing of value?

When you're signing, could your signature be the thing of value that's actually creating it?

And you could essentially say that your signature is a thing of value because it's a necessary part of the promissory note.

And when we come back on the other side, I'll explain why they only want your signature.

When he gets you to put your signature on the promise to pay for the most part, they really don't want you to pay.

As soon as you put your signature on the note and he has it in his hand, he will sell it immediately for 103% of the original principle.

Okay, that will give you good grounds for a motion to rescind your signature from the document.

I want to see which one of you has the note. Tell me with my ink signature, because that's the only way we're going to see who has the original note.

three-dimensional biosignature. This biosignature is a headshot that can be used to track the

signatures, completely different signatures filed with county clerk's offices all around

different signatures. And some of them are rubber stamp, robo signed, and also embedded

the signature prints out as part of the document. Okay, hold on. We're about to go to break.

with an embedded signature? Explain that. Okay, I'll explain it. This substitute, Trustee,

doing is they are superimposing a photocopy of some signature into the document where

the same and print out, robo-print it, okay, with signatures in the documents, and these

for the signer to have to sign this document manually rather than put an electronic signature

Then you need to file a motion to rescind your signature.

and ask the court to rescind your signature and remand this case for trial.

They can't just try to enter the court and say, Judge, I want to rescind your signature.

Well, you can petition to rescind your signature from the plea, and the challenge to the jurisdiction

Got a signature to get it back in the vote to get it repealed and it got repealed.

Have them verify your signature with the notary stamp.

to the governor for his signature.

standing. And in order to do that, they have to have not only the original wedding signature note,

purportedly from that error, with a signature on it. So the actual note,

the lien note, has no signature on it from... Okay, okay, hold on.

and a signature and that's it. And it's in the, you know, package.

It is take all of these signatures from all of the documents filed in the clerk's office.

Take them to a private investigator and have him run those signatures and see if those signatures

If you've got a bogus signature on one of them, it breaks the chain.

partially filled in with no signature and no notary stamp.

copies of litigation papers served by parties upon each other do not bear original signatures.

The original signatures are for the court.

Okay. Now that warrant that the municipality will carry on to the property, at least in Leander, has no notary on it, and the judge's signature is not a signature at all. It's a rubber stamp.

Okay. The problem, though, is you've got to make the argument it's a rubber stamp and who applied it. Right. Okay. But the deal is, is that most clerks or at least the district clerk is authorized to issue warrants without a judge's signature.

I assumed it's done by signature.

There has to be someone of competent authority to take that swearing and verify the signature.

There is an officer's signature on it, a digital signature, done via the computer.

A sworn and verified statement has to have somebody authorized by law to administer an oath and to verify the signature on the complaint.

go down to the bottom of the grievance form and there's a link just before the signature

The objective thing is they can't hold you. They must release you on a signature.

And when you signed your signature on a promise to pay, you only had one purpose in mind,

That certificate of title with that signature now serves as your MSO MCO.

Because they're taking that electronic signature and they are stamping it on the paperwork that you have never seen, did not approve, and do your waving rights on that paper the moment they generate it.

When you take my signature without my knowledge and consent, you capture it and you stick it

on a document that insists that that signature creates a waiver of my rights to something,

that and they took your signature without your knowledge or consent, stamped it on a

free zone and then at the bottom where the officer signed it just above his signature

or another officer standing next to him that certified his signature on the document? Well

you present when the ticket was written? Oh no. Okay but there is no other signature.

about the Travis County with the signature pass that they're using at their precincts. Yes. To do

that signature and they print it out on the bottom of a form that has not been disclosed to you

being done before you signed anything. They captured your signature and placed it on this

Well, if they're, if they're asking you to put your signature on a document, if you

Just write up a letter stating that you rescind your signature.

explanation of what you were signing you rescind your signature.

But the notary just verified the signature of the document

Do not, under any circumstances, put a signature on that little electronic pad.

When notaries notarize, they are notarizing your signature, that is it.

one documents you have with my ink signature, and I'm not any kind of photo copy. I want

agreement says that. I have an actual ink signature document that says that. That actually

forged signatures by the substitute trustee who conducted before a closure sale on that

property. Absolutely. If you can show that the signatures are forged, absolutely take

didn't write it is when he doesn't see an attorney signature at the end.

You know, and we need 80,000 signatures, I believe. I helped with the sales petition tax up there about a year ago. So just take that tip in mind, you know, get your sigs and we'll put it on the ballot and, you know, that's when the argument needs to be made.

But let's go to eight, a space for the signature of the owner of the vehicle

Is that your signature?

Under the subjective standard, under the law of the land standard, then there's a whole lot more at issue rather than just the question of, is that your signature?

And I might also add, they're not going to give you a quote unquote new title. They're just going to send back the same thing with a signature on it, signing off their ownership.

Craig Caldwell verified Joe Evans' signature

And the entire structure of government it set up can't function because Congress can't pass a law without a presidential signature.

and these planes will fly right through the energy signature that creates the cirrus clouds

And the signatures would go from north to south very quickly.

they don't put their name under the signature line.

You're looking at one right now, and I mean, I can't even read the signature, so.

Whose signature is this?

Now, they can sign it as verifying the affiant's signature, but they cannot be the affiant.

Okay. This is what I would do. Who signed it as the verifier of the affiant's signature?

Whose is the second signature?

Yeah, the second signature on there is the prosecutor.

Now, remember, they cannot give you an add-on sheet that does not contain a signature or your initials for the conditions on it and state that that is a part of the agreement.

different signatures only there's actually places for multiple assignments on

don't have room on the document for all the signatures they attach another

document to put more signatures on that's called in a launch so he has to

investigator to run all the signatures on all the documentation, especially that documentation

the court that there were no signatures nor were there any court seals or JP seals, they

or a complaint against me with signature required?

and notarizing signatures when the signator was not in her presence, which of course is

scheme, saying they forged signatures on tens of thousands of default notices.

signatures on the documents they had forged, and file the fraudulent paperwork in order

for recording, false certification on certain instruments, and notarization of the signature

Earlier this month, Lawrence pleaded guilty to one count of notarizing the signature of

Okay, was it your signature on the citation?

The real problem they have with those signatures is they'll have, it's not so much the attorneys,

then they will take what they have and scan the format and try to recreate it in what looks like a wedding signature document.

But you want to take all those signatures and give them to a private investigator and have him run the names.

My signature's on it.

When they take your signature and stamp it on paperwork that you have no knowledge of and did not approve, that's identity theft when it's being used for illicit purposes.

I said, I don't know where my signature's going to go. She said it goes straight to the judge or paperless court.

I told her I wanted to know where my signature was going.

Well, if they're going to be paperless, they're also going to be signatureless.

I've got three signatures.

And that's the grand jury foreman in that note to please write your initials on this sheet because I suspect the prosecuting attorney has a stamp with your entire signature on it, but initial this and send it back to me in the self-addressed stamped envelope and let me know that you receive these complaints.

Well, they showed me a recent document, a shipping document from my center that contained my forged signature.

Yeah, because it wasn't my signature and I didn't authorize it.

And at the end of my signature, I just put U-period, D-period.

So it'll have my signature verified before notary.

So, the other thing he received was a speeding ticket that is in the signature location.

That's what she put in writing with an signature.

by an attorney, this is not an attorney signature at the end of it. I definitely do not want to

notary public signature or stamp. It says corporation court and the judge's signature

Well, if there's no signature, it's not a complaint.

Well, there's a signature, but there's no name, and the signature's not legible, so

Is it stamped and sworn to by a second signature?

Without a verifying signature and someone authorized to administer the oath, it's not

Okay, so when you say a verifying signature, does that mean that shows the printed name

and the signature?

There has to be two signatures and a seal.

So two signatures and a seal.

other than this chicken scratch that somebody called the signature.

The only exception to that is an indictment which must be signed and submitted from a grand jury and brought down with the signature of the grand jury foreman, okay?

So I've got her signature that I was there at least.

Okay, okay, do so, pull everything and get all the signatures off, off of them.

I want to read you what is down there where your signature block goes.

never disclosed on the citation that sneaky, in a box above your signature, that it says

now I said sure, I'll sign it, I'll sign under protest NGRS, and I said signature, signed

And that's what they're doing with Jeff. See, they use these rubber stamp orders. They use these rubber stamps or clerk's orders or electronic signatures which they won't produce upon request under the 2000 E-Sign Act.

be done in writing with my signature and a corresponding signature by the prosecuting

Look at whatever statute deals with the signature requirement,

believe it's the second banner down beyond tangy tangerine with Alex Jones signature

And in this case specifically, they're saying Oregon Trustee Act, which requires the signatures

But have you looked at the signatures on the leans and the signatures in the documents in the county coordinator county registrar's office and check them against the robo signers?

I just went to court last week to check what was filed and make sure everything's that all the signatures were proper and the bank hadn't even filed the lien in the court record.

Call the entity that the signature claims to be a function area of.

Then you go to the local district court with the record and the evidence that the signature is not a person authorized to sign it.

He looks in the four corners of it and you show in the evidence that the signature cannot be valid because according to their own personnel records, this person never worked for the company.

But I wouldn't do that if I find that one of the signatories are actually a bogus signature.

Well, maybe, but they do it. They actually issue one. The problem is they don't do it in accordance with law because it says the signature of the affian has to be affixed to the document.

Of those, 4500 showed signature irregularities, a telltale sign of the illegal practice of robo-signing

The facts are clear enough on their face, for instance, if you come in and say, I have this signature here

It's important to get that because your signature, being your property, created that instrument, that negotiable instrument called a note, that is your personal property. That personal property happens to have a face value very much like a check.

They're looking at the documentation, the signatures on the documentation

Then we look at the signatures

Look close at the notary signatures

4500 showed signature irregularities a telltale sign of the illegal practice of robo signing

signature for the sworn signature on it, okay?

And then in writing, returned signature requested, certified not, won't accept a written request.

And the federal courts told him that while you got your decision, never let your signature tarnish.

out and the signature is computer font.

It's not actually a signature and there is a statute that says the officer must sign

from a legal perspective and that is electronic signatures.

There is a specific statute allowing the signing of the documents through electronic signature.

His signature is way off the line and that kind of stuff.

Really where is the verified sworn signature on the citation?

signs his signature and is it notarized?

Okay, but it does have to have an affian signature and it does have to have a verification signature

What is under the name of the person that signed it identifying what signature that is?

Does it say verification signature, verifying agent, what?

What is listed there under the signature on the name line?

And the reason being is once he secured a signature on the note, then he would sell that security entity,

The only certain people can verify signatures by law.

There's only a specific list of people that can verify that affiant signature.

Even if I have no written contract without her signature, I can still do that.

I've had a lot of people raise an issue about the deed of trust and say it wasn't valid because it only had one signature on it.

Well, it turns out that it only needs one signature because it is the borrower that creates the trust,

Yeah, it's just, so I'm not saying the fact that I paid off my mortgage and the fact that I have verified that a release of lien has been filed in county records is worthless without receipt of my original wedding signature

I think that my signature on those documents make those documents mine.

Separately, not with the same signature but separate signatures.

Separate signatures, that is correct.

Okay, who is the authenticator, the verifier of the signature? Who's second signature is there?

Wait a minute, is the date and the printed signature, a printed name of the notary stamped on the document, or are they written in hand?

that the documents don't get too large and I can't tell an electronic signature from a real one.

signature's name, all I have, I can do this in five minutes, photograph it, drop it into computer,

open it in photoshop and magnify it a few times. If that signature turns into pixels,

That signature at 150 dots per inch, he's going to blow up into little squares really quickly.

but the signature would. Okay. That would clearly demonstrate the fraud. Nobody scans over 150

it's going to pixelate. Immediately. Yeah. The hand signature won't

notary's written signature, a written name below the signature. I find this on a lot of documents,

is look at the signatures on the documents and check them against the known robo signers.

How is that not a conflict of interest if the clerk signatures on the complaint?

Now, we also are going to object to any non-judicial decision making. Anything the clerk does that doesn't bear a judge's signature, we're not agreeing to.

I want to go and get my note. My signature is the only signature on my promissory note. My signature is the only signature on the data trust. Therefore, I own those documents, and they are withholding my property from me, and I want to know how to get it back.

If it wasn't, then the assignment's bogus. If it was, then look at the signatures on the document and the notaries.

That's if everybody who's authorized to sign documents for them. And then look at the notary itself. What I'm finding on most of them is that the only entry on the jurorate by the hand of the notary is the signature.

The signature on the document, the date on the jurorate, the date on the certificate of service, and the printed name of the notary was all in the exact same hand with the exact same pen.

The signature of the notary was dramatically different.

Yeah, that signature. You know, okay, I'm going to admit something that at the time I didn't realize was the wrong thing to do.

they have taken the notary's signature or even the whole jurorate, captured it out, they take an undated jurorate and sign it.

And then I want to look at those notary signatures.

And if I can take a notary signature off of a document in one record and then copy it out and superimpose it over a document in another record

You file against the head of that department because there won't be a signature on any

He died in a nursing home 29 days later in a coma, his signature is way beyond being

Produce the document, and it better have my signature on it.

Six, it must bear the signature or mark of the Afian.

I just put, without prejudice, at the bottom. I write that and then I write my signature above it.

Tony, you may also want to look and see above the signature line what you're actually agreeing to.

You have, let's say, an annuity and you sell half of your annuity to a company and on the document you put a reservation of rights with your signature.

Yes, the company that was supposed to receive the check that did not receive it, started court action. But when they send you the documents, your signature and your reservation of rights was all tampered with and whiteed out.

The second officer, his signature would be Z.

The first cop, his signature would be P.

all his signature on it, all the pictures of inside and outside of my property with the

employees at the district. I said, but his name's on the paper, and it's his signature on the paper.

and Engineers for 9-11 events, the press release when they had 1,000 signatures for

Most complaints must have a signature, and they must be signed in front of someone that can administer an oath for that signature.

And they must verify with their own signature.

Now, are you positive the signature on the complaint is the officer and not a clerk of the court?

Uh, I think the officer, uh, owner of his signature is there too.

I suspect if I start looking this Iris Bailey, I'll find a lot of notary signatures that look like the one in this case,

But the only writing on the verification that is in the hand of the notary is the signature.

You'll have a document with a date and a signature of an affiant.

And would I file that against? Now, this is the clerk of the court that has a signature on that warrant for my arrest.

It took me five minutes, Randy, to find six different signatures of Linda Green and Valerie Finney that were all different.

Did you validate this signature

Did they ever serve you with a copy of a document that has two signatures on it?

Based on your signature on the deed of trust, the lender provided you with a warranted deed.

So these microspheres contain also the chemical signature of thermite, ignited thermite.

When you sign this document, is it presumed that this signature is under oath?

Out of your signature.

And then there was the signature of the notary, and then the notary's printed name was also

But the one thing that is signed is the notary's signature.

Nothing else on the document, the affiant signature, nothing else matches the notary's

signature.

Or with the current technology, they simply took a copy of the notary's signature and

I started to take this signature, drop it into Photoshop and erase the flat line that

I could put 20 signatures on that document and none of them would exactly match.

They would all look like signatures of the notary, but if you superimposed them, none

The signature of the affiant and the signature of the notary.

of trustee's deed, the notary, there's a notary signature, but there's no date.

One has everything written in this, hand of the affiant, except the notary signature.

Yeah, it's okay to promise to appear. That's what the signature is supposed to be for,

them, okay. I asked them to send me a verification of the wet signature note. They haven't sent

I requested, you know, to see the note, the wedding signature note, they sent me a letter,

The house is currency and your signature on that note creating that negotiable instrument

trust go away, then the only focus the lender has is to come back after the signature on

the note. But if he comes and looks at the signature on the note, now he's looking at

At the bottom of the document, there was the signature line and it was signed.

And that one had everything on it filled out by in this same hand, except for the signature of the known, which was in a very elegant, beautiful handwriting.

Well, I received the insert air quote affidavit, put another air quote, in the mail. It has a scanned signature of the affiant, a scanned signature of the lawyer, and, as a bonus, a scanned rubber stamp.

The signature is a scanned. Notary public state of Wisconsin, my commission expires, expires as crossed out, is permanent.

No, it's scanned as in the signature composed of dots, as opposed to lines, or a photocopy of an ink signature.

So it's an electronic signature is what you're saying?

It's an electronic signature, yes, and the stamp is also electronic.

You're saying that the signature was not placed on the original document by the hand of the assayers,

In which case, how does anyone certify that it's an actual signature by an actual party?

The signatures appear to be scanned in signatures from something and inserted into the document,

13712-2M says this subchapter, meaning electronic signatures, does not apply to any of the following records or transactions

It is the notary signature that give it a, not a court document, but an official document stamp.

Now, the other thing in looking at the state, it talks all about electronic signatures.

And I think she disagreed with the Attorney General because the Attorney General was sitting there arguing that an associate judge's signature on a temporary order

did not count if it did not have the presiding judge's signature on it.

corners of the document are these problems we have this signature here and even if the

signature states that this person is an attorney big deal if there is not a notice in the county

There are three signatures on this paper now.

Who's magistrate's signature is on that warrant?

You go down to the courthouse and I go down to the jail and show that to the jailer and ask the jailer to try to use his signature that is.

She also said because the judge's signature is like a computer dropped it on and somebody wrote in, Judge City of Fort Worth, this whole thing is computer generated.

Good chance it is. So now you need to get every judge's signature. If you can find a signature that looks like that, then you hit that judge and demand that he show you the affidavit of probable cause.

No, it was not. Okay. Then definitely take that signature down. And you might look in the court record. I think the clerk can pull up records based on the judge's name.

I understand that. But how are you going to get all of the different judges and signatures without spending two or three days digging through all the records and doing search after search? There should be a place. There should be something all the judges have to sign.

And everyone that I spoke to today said that they didn't recognize that judge's signature

Okay, Randy, according to the seal and the signature on this warrant, this is a municipal court judge in the city of Fort Worth.

And then pull a case and get a copy of his signature.

And then go down and say, don't tell them you have all the signatures.

Just tell them that you have this signature and you can't find out who it belongs to.

And that let them talk some judge into popping up and saying, oh yeah, that's my signature.

Okay, when it comes to signatures, I've been examining these court documents and the signature.

I have signatures that don't look anything like something that would be the name that it's a signature for now.

I don't know if those are actually the person's signature, but I've got really outrageous stuff.

But I would get in order to make this work, you have to have every single magistrates signature in your hand.

And then look at those signatures and make sure they don't match this one.

The signature, who signed it and what is the authority stated for the signatory?

Can you prove that the signatures are forged?

attorneys for the plaintiff, but there's no attorney signature on here.

Okay, is there any writing on the jurat that appears to be of the same hand as the signature?

Okay, that's enough. That's what we need. The date of the document should be just above or just to the left of the signature.

and do everything else on the face of the citation by your signature, then they're not making

There has to be a signed waiver with the signatures of both the accused individual and the attorney for the state before 27.14D can be operative.

The state made an appearance through who? There's no attorney signature saying I'm here to represent the state.

Tomorrow, we will have 4,500 signatures to submit to the Secretary of State's Office, which is almost double what they require.

The prosecutor can be the witness. He can verify the signature, but he can't be the affiant.

You make up one complaint, take it to a notary and have your signature verified.

I will swear to it and I want you to verify my signature on it.

I just kind of thought I should do this recently is under my signature.

In fact, the one that I'm sitting here holding has a signature line for the defendant where presumably you're supposed to go get this thing signed as if you're agreeing that this pretrial notice somehow has authority.

And 27.14d can only be applicable if the accused has a signed waiver that has both their signature and the prosecuting attorneys of the state on it,

Since this document contains only the signature of a clerk of the court and not a magistrate or judge

then Renny Willis by placing her signature on this document is acting as a judicial officer.

She can only act via agency of the judge and there's no signature by a judge or magistrate on here

So by the return receipt signature on the card addressing the motion to him or her then that judge now is duty bound to act upon that complaint.

c, it does not contain a valid signature attesting to its issuance by any valid and proper official authority authorized to issue a misdemeanor summons, and Craig maintains that the clerk of the court is not such an authority for such purpose.

Sworn to or affirmed by, and it's got some idiots reproduced at signature.

I'm assuming this is rubber stamped or written off an electronic pad according to the thickness of the writing of the signature.

So it's not an original signature.

It is an undisputed fact that the alleged officer's signature on the bill of pains and penalties appears to have been artificially reproduced on the original document and subsequent copies and is not an original signature, see attached.

It is an undisputed fact that the alleged officer's signature on the bill of pains and penalties is unverified and therefore the statement is not made under oath as a sworn statement, though it falsely states that it is immediately preceding the signature, see attached.

It is an undisputed fact that the alleged officer's signature on the bill of pains and penalties, wait a minute, I hate it when the scroll doesn't work, is an undisputed fact that the individual was neither in nor near the automobile in question on the alleged date and time.

undisputed fact that immediately below the alleged officer's signature appears the following

the signatures, meet the people, and actually get elected.

and that document contained a signature on it,

that wasn't a real signature, but was a printed signature.

from taking a signature, taking my signature,

a borrower signature, scanning it at 612, 1400 DPI,

him to verify your signature.

It will have state versus whoever on it. And generally, it will have some sort of court seal, but it will have no authorizing signature.

I sent them via restricted signature on the document I had it served by a friend who the

Yes, with restricted signature.

and this goes to the heart of what one of your guests was talking about the load signatures.

but he did go into some discussion about the load signatures.

not only will they be able to tell what kind of appliances you're using just based on the load signature,

I mean, as far as your concerns about the load signature, he did confirm that,

can you verify whether our meters are catching load signatures or not?

And I was told that at this time they are not catching the load signatures

Just that at one point, I would like to point out what a load signature is and what that might be happening in their homes if this is a good time.

Encore may want to say theirs is different and we'll find out, hopefully, but that they pick up what's called a load signature.

But it is also these load signatures. Absolutely. In that PUC document, I'm looking at it right now, and some of the uses of this data, exactly, here are some of their suggestions because it's the PUC telling the utilities, here's some ideas for you.

and get a signature so there's a good chance they can't even tell you what it

Yes, that's the one that we determined that it was more than likely was his signature

Well, I have verification that that's his signature.

I suspect that the district attorney has a rubber stamp with your signature on it and is using that to create fraudulent indictments.

Did the warrant that they left with you have a magistrate's signature on it?

Okay, and it has this judge's signature as a signature legible?

No, the signature is not legible, but I have verified that it resembles his signature on

Gary Johnson is 11 valid signatures short and he should qualify Monday because more are being validated

You never see all of the writing on the juror hat in the same hand except the signature of the notary.

with our actual wedding signatures on it.

with the original wedding signatures.

but I'm glad you got an expert here about notaries and such, and signatures in court documents.

with a totally different signature and rubber stamp.

Are these signatures verified?

and a word that this person's signature on this document.

It says this person swore that that was his signature.

Because the jurat is saying that, yes, that's my signature.

The way I interpret what you're asking is, yes, that was my notarized signature,

or that signature is mine.

And I swear, yeah, I swear on my oath, that's my signature.

that is in the hand of the notary is the signature.

Except this signature of the notary, which was in a very fine, very well.

The only thing on that document in the notary's hand was the notary's signature.

On this one, everything was in this hand except the signature.

He was obviously there. He sat down in front of the borrower and the borrower signed the document and the notary verified his signature and he filled in the date.

Right. And we always have the seal. We always have the signature of the notary.

You have the notary signature written in by, the notary's name written in and print by the notary.

And then you have the notary's signature.

And she's not responding because she knows that she doesn't have your signature in her book.

In this particular case, we did a mortgage in April of 2006, and she notaries the quick claim deed and the deed of trust, and then we refinanced again in October, and she did the notary for that, and we never met her for any of those signatures.