Rule of Law Radio Archive Search Engine

because if they can only investigate you based on a valid complaint and the complaint is not valid

And since the person filing the criminal complaint is not necessarily learned counsel, most courts require that when the prosecuting attorney receives the document,

if he feels that the complaint is not valid, then he could certainly go in there and argue against indictment.

generally a complaint is not real technical. That's the only thing that I've seen that

A complaint is not filed unless it's filed in writing, sworn to before a magistrate, and verified.

If the cop that signed the complaint is not the cop that wrote the ticket,

There has to be a valid complaint and an unsigned complaint is not valid.

a copy of the court record and the complaint is not in there, that's reasonable probable

and a complaint is not a complaint unless it's verified or affirmed.

So right there the city attorney is trying to convince the judge a complaint is not even required,

a written complaint is not required.

which is obvious because the complaint is nothing,

The first one being that the complaint is not a valid charging instrument, no way, no how

The other problem is the complaint is not a valid charging instrument.

Excuse me, it doesn't say that a complaint is not a charging instrument, it just doesn't include it in the discussion of

If that is the primary pleading, then a complaint is not a primary pleading

Now while it's true in Texas law that the person signing the complaint is not required

because a complaint is not a complaint unless it's verified.

So a complaint is not a complaint unless it's affirmed before a notary and verified by the notary.

Now here's what the courts have all said about a complaint. The complaint is not required

And that's exactly what it is. The complaint is nothing more than an accusation. The citation

What if that complaint is not at this hearing?

And a complaint is not a charging instrument.

The complaint is not a valid charging instrument.

and I know the whole issue about a complaint is not really sufficient,

A complaint is not a charging instrument.

a criminal complaint is not going to make him happy. Okay. You're a dirty, stinking rotten

In other words, the complaint is not required to give proper, complete notice of the offense

work is, the complaint is not lodged with the police department, though it could be,

The Texas courts have ruled time and time again a complaint is not required to have

Well, jeez Louise people, if the criminal complaint is not required to have all of the

So I had a guy in the courthouse to get a criminal complaint. But Randy says that criminal complaint is not really any good and you really need to go get an indictment.

You don't need a charging instrument. A criminal complaint is not a charging instrument.

A complaint is not a proper charging instrument under Texas Constitution or law.

about that. First of all, you said like a complaint is not a charging instrument and

There is tons and tons of case law here in Texas that says the complaint is not required

The complaint is not signed under penalty of perjury.

a complaint is not required to list all of the things required to be proved at trial.

The importance of somebody filing a complaint is not that anything's going to get done necessarily.

The complaint is not the complaint is what backs up that primary pleading.

If the complaint is not against a public official and it simply alleges that a citizen committed

Most of these courts want you to state specifics as to why a complaint is not sufficient

The complaint is not initiated by a public official.

A complaint is not required to list all of the necessary elements required to be proven at trial.

a prosecuting attorney for the purpose of filing a criminal complaint is not a credible person.

Because the complaint is not the charging instrument. The indictment or information is.

But the form of a criminal complaint is not important.

When a complaint is filed, it's intended to be filed by a private citizen, so the form on a complaint is not so particular.

You just make out a document and since it's intended to be prepared and filed by private citizens, the form of the complaint is not critical.

Okay, remember the complaint is not anything more than an accusation. They can accuse anything based upon any facts.

So the structure of the criminal complaint is not so strict.

But you have to remember the argument that the complaint is not required to contain all the elements required to be proven.

The complaint is not even in the proper format.

The complaint is not the charging instrument, okay?

penalty of perjury, which everyone knows a criminal complaint is not.

The complaint is not required to list all of the elements required to be proven.

So since a complaint is not required to have that allegation, they take it entirely upon

And I've found if you just write the complaint the best you can, they're going to send you back a letter or a few letters stating why your complaint is not a complaint at all

is the affiant in a criminal complaint is not required to be someone with personal knowledge

it's still not an affidavit. You know why? Because the complaint is not required to be signed under

A complaint is not actually sworn to, nor is it actually verified as being sworn to, and here's why.

Second, a valid affidavit is nonexistent in law unless it is sworn under penalty of perjury, which we know a complaint is not and cannot do because it is not required to be signed by a person with competent firsthand knowledge.

Normally, the person that signed the complaint is not the charging individual. It is a clerk of the court who has no firsthand knowledge of the facts.

The purpose of a complaint is not to charge someone, but to accuse someone.

Not the least of which is the fact that a complaint is not required to meet all of the other requirements of a charging instrument

A criminal complaint is not a sworn statement

And in this case, while a complaint is not directed to a grand jury, the grand jury

And whoever's saying that with a complaint is not correct

If the complaint is not important enough to verify individually, then stick them all together.

What's not in the new complaint is not before the court.

If a complaint is not valid, unless it specifically cites a law of this state, and this state

Therefore, the allegation made in the complaint is not facially valid or sound because it

it would dilute the effect of the complaint as the purpose of the complaint is not to put focus on

A criminal complaint is not sufficient to give a trial court jurisdiction to try the cause.

So a complaint is not, it has certain requirements that must be there,

Which the criminal complaint is not done under

If a complaint is not filed within 48 hours from the time of the initial appearance before

And since a complaint is not the equivalent, legally speaking, of an affidavit,

Okay, the complaint is not 1983.

the complaint is not the person who is making the complaint.

Yeah, part of the routine. The whole point of fighting the complaint is not to get them to act on it.

You get one about a month later saying that the complaint is not up to par and all that stuff.

They requested that they remove the lien. They refused to remove the lien so they violated the act. It doesn't take that much. A criminal complaint is not intended to be exhaustive.

the original complaint is not before the court anymore.

A complaint is not a primary pleading. It is not a pleading that invests jurisdiction in anyone for any purpose relating to prosecution.

and overruled, I was springing up the issue that the complaint is not a charging instrument.

It's another reason why a criminal complaint is not a valid charging instrument because it cannot be stopped once it's filed in the same manner that an indictment or information can by moving to quash, set aside, or take exception to.

Well, the 14th Amendment complaint is not a criminal complaint.

And since perjury can only be done under oath based upon personal knowledge and the criminal complaint is not required to be signed by someone with personal knowledge, the two do not go together.

It will not fly because that aspect of making a criminal complaint is not punishable in any way, shape, or form.

or they're using just the complaint as a charging instrument. But the complaint is not a valid

if you read the Code of Common Procedure in the Texas Constitution, the complaint is not

Filing a criminal complaint is not a right.

So the form of the criminal complaint is not specifically controlling.

Yeah. What about it? Yeah, well, the T-Cole Complaint is not an officer. Well, you know,

A complaint is not intended to be perfect in form, as it is, the court is to pay attention

complaint is not required to be in any specific form. If you file a complaint on a piece of

His job accepting a criminal complaint is not limited to what county it's filed in or from

And a complaint is not given to a judge.

if the complaint is not invalid on its face,

Your complaint is not a presentation.

which the code of criminal procedure specifically says in chapter 45 that the complaint is not

A complaint is not.

complaint is not as relevant as the fact that they stated under oath or the principal did that he

Filing a new complaint is not a response to why they should not hold you as a vexatious litigant.

complaint is not valid on this point it's not valid on this point that authority is not the

no jurisdiction is invested in a court without a signed complaint period but a complaint is not

So, the bar for a complaint is not so high. So, when it's a penal case, they must give it to

But you could raise a complaint anyway and let them rule that the complaint is not well founded. Who cares? Complaint stays on the record anyway.

If the clerk, if the complaint is not filed

them. And the actual complaint is not that complex.

complaint. Criminal complaint is not just, he hit me. The criminal complaint has to go to an offense.

The criminal complaint is not quite finished, that'll have to be tomorrow.

under the direction of a licensing agency, then the complaint is not against the business,

The complaint is not required to be sworn under oath.

Now, that complaint is not good enough to start a court case

If the complaint is not valid, which we have determined it is not because it does not comply with law, okay?

>> Okay, if the complaint is not valid,

If the defendant screws up the original complaint, even if the original complaint is not as good as it could have been,

of probable cause. The way the system works is the complaint is not presented to the court

If the filer of the complaint is not a credible person, credible person is in Texas and generally

guess when 1999 so nobody has any excuses for still acting that way no a complaint is not

summons, every point on the complaint is not true.

Well, a verified complaint is not a sworn complaint, according to Texas law.

plaintiff to file a complaint. If a complaint is not filed within 20 days after service,