Rule of Law Radio Archive Search Engine

I couldn't find anything that gave me specific grounds for challenge jurisdiction.

appearance which and you challenge jurisdiction now you're saying the citation is only in effect a promise to appear and once they appear there has to be an information or a charging instrument there's got to be something else well yeah that's a requirement simply because he's 100 percent correct

When you file any motions, are you giving them jurisdiction so I can't challenge jurisdiction?

Challenge jurisdiction first thing.

You challenge jurisdiction first thing.

Now, you can challenge jurisdiction, do an abatement, and raise all kinds of other issues in the original pleading.

you challenge jurisdiction, move to question indictment.

But if we challenge jurisdiction and he does have subject matter jurisdiction, he can certainly

To challenge jurisdiction?

and I actually have in mind to at some point or another challenge jurisdiction.

Motion to challenge jurisdiction.

Because you can't even challenge jurisdiction.

No one, not attorneys, never in a courtroom challenge jurisdiction.

the motion. What that does is restarts the clock. Since you can challenge jurisdiction

no matter how we move in history, you challenge jurisdiction. They refuse to hear it.

Once you challenge jurisdiction, the judge was without jurisdiction until she proved it up

So the first thing you do is challenge jurisdiction.

I said, I challenge jurisdiction.

So those are the only things I got in were those three notices and the motion to challenge jurisdiction.

Okay. Motion to challenge jurisdiction is a different animal.

applies if you don't challenge jurisdiction.

Now, write the challenge jurisdiction.

Now you cannot waive subject matter, but you are waiving impersonal if you do anything other than challenge jurisdiction.

So these guys that challenge jurisdiction and get ruled against it and refuse to deal with the court, they're shooting themselves in the foot.

jurisdictional challenge on every point on which you can challenge jurisdiction. I see.

So once you challenge jurisdiction until it was proven the court was without jurisdiction

So right off the bat, we challenge jurisdiction on several grounds.

Now, if you if the case, let's say you get served and you want to challenge jurisdiction, can you go at them on the basis of that?

So I'm trying to figure out how to challenge jurisdiction

You challenge jurisdiction if they rule against you.

just said it's ludicrous to challenge jurisdiction go look at uh the title 18 section 7 and then they

The court cannot say, oh, I grant you permission to challenge jurisdiction.

I've had to go and, you know, go before the court, having to, you know, have them or challenge jurisdiction on all kinds of stuff.

he said well since you've already pled uh that you've uh lost your right to challenge jurisdiction

that he can challenge jurisdiction at sentencing because he didn't do anything for him.

Now, how does he challenge jurisdiction without his lawyer because he's probably going to

he plan to challenge jurisdiction on what grounds?

together to challenge jurisdiction, which is quintessential because I spent all day

You said challenge jurisdiction claim of double jeopardy.

I still can't challenge jurisdiction even on the part that there was no valid complaint or...

Why would the prosecutor challenge jurisdiction?

And I guess, like you said, the main thing is to go and challenge jurisdiction.

But the point here is, is since they're administrative in nature, no matter what they tell you, these are administrative and in administrative hearings, you don't get to challenge jurisdiction if you've accepted jurisdiction because it is completely by agreement.

and discuss the matter without violating your right to challenge jurisdiction

Once you challenge jurisdiction, they have a requirement to prove up jurisdiction. If they don't offer evidence to prove up jurisdiction and the judge rules in their favor, then you file criminally against the judge with the local grand jury.

and I said here by special appearance to challenge jurisdiction,

I'm here by special appearance to challenge jurisdiction.

I said I'm here by special appearance to challenge jurisdiction.

However, I know that I could still go back and challenge jurisdiction even after I missed all of that.

Now, I talked to somebody else and they mentioned, well, maybe you could make you could work out a payment situation while you fight, you know, and challenge jurisdiction.

I did actually challenge jurisdiction at like my 27th arraignment that they've given me since January.

And I challenge jurisdiction.

And once you challenge jurisdiction, it must be proved.

Well, one of the things is he did challenge jurisdiction several times.

because if you properly challenge jurisdiction in the original trial court and they were

Would it be a wise idea to challenge jurisdiction again after a judgment has been ordered

You can challenge jurisdiction any time.

So can you still challenge jurisdiction?

One group says that you can only challenge jurisdiction before you plead.

The other group says that you can challenge jurisdiction during trial and stop the trial if they don't have evidence.

that I was there just to challenge jurisdiction.

told him I was there by special appointment only to challenge jurisdiction on the matter

And again, I told him that I was here by special appearance to challenge jurisdiction and that

Then did you ever challenge jurisdiction for failure to provide a speedy trial?

at the time you were arrested. Okay. Should I challenge jurisdiction? Well, absolutely. You

Okay. So the only thing I need to do is appeal. So I don't need to challenge jurisdiction here.

In this, in this particular civil matter, that's what they're calling the civil matter. I don't need to challenge jurisdiction here.

Well, not how are you going to challenge jurisdiction if this court was grand authority to hear these types of cases and you went in to do exactly that.

challenge jurisdiction I guess I don't want to challenge it based upon they

and I was there to challenge jurisdiction in standing in agency and he just totally

You know, you can challenge jurisdiction even after the fact.

No. At that point, if you challenge jurisdiction, there is no cross-examination script.

challenged it must be proven once you challenge jurisdiction the court loses jurisdiction

And if you challenge jurisdiction and they failed to answer and prove jurisdiction after

and ultimately never did challenge jurisdiction on it,

then you could challenge jurisdiction.

If any of that's true, then you can challenge jurisdiction.

I've understood that if you accept a public defender or a court-appointed attorney, that you cannot challenge jurisdiction.

Okay, should I challenge jurisdiction?

We always challenge jurisdiction.

challenge jurisdiction once, always, and forever.

You have the right to challenge jurisdiction, whether it be civil or criminal.

The rule is thus, challenge jurisdiction once.

about it being you're able to go back at any point in time to challenge jurisdiction,

And that's what you challenge jurisdiction on, or at least you challenge the form and substance of the instrument.

You have a right to challenge jurisdiction.

You don't need that to challenge jurisdiction. If somebody don't have jurisdiction,

Which concept lies at the heart of the legal maxim, challenge jurisdiction once, always, and forever?

If I can challenge – I can challenge jurisdiction now still.

Challenge jurisdiction once, always, and forever.

Well, the thing is, you can challenge jurisdiction any time, even years later.

Well, the thing is, you can challenge jurisdiction anytime, even years later.

Had you filed this this close to the day of trial for any reason other than to disqualify the judge or straight up challenge jurisdiction of that court?

If he did, he waived your right to challenge jurisdiction

that would allow you to challenge jurisdiction after the fact. Okay. I see. Also regarding

In pretrial, I challenge jurisdiction, okay, and they never proved it.

And when you challenge jurisdiction, the court must prove jurisdiction and the judge didn't.

It takes it from a category of general in which you waive in personal jurisdiction to special in which you retain the right to challenge jurisdiction.

Okay. We're going to go to a different place to challenge jurisdiction.

If it's still current, then you can challenge jurisdiction based upon the fact

Now we've all heard it, folks. You go into the court, and I'm here to challenge jurisdiction, and the magistrate, not the prosecutor, the magistrate says this court's got jurisdiction.

is it uncommon for a party bringing a lawsuit to challenge jurisdiction?

Any motion to challenge jurisdiction provided for herein shall be heard and determined before

So I need to challenge jurisdiction.

Yes, you challenge jurisdiction, but you challenge personal jurisdiction.

I told them I'm not here to plead, I'm here to challenge jurisdiction

once you challenge jurisdiction jurisdiction is lost the presumption no longer stands

I got a traffic ticket, and then I was told that the, I followed the motions to dismiss and challenge jurisdiction,

And if you challenge jurisdiction here, but obviously first we need to look at Georgia law and see if there's some provision that transfers jurisdiction when you ask for a jury trial, although I can't, I've never heard of that before.

How did you challenge jurisdiction?

And I didn't challenge jurisdiction as yet, I was trying to get the answer to a, do I still challenge jurisdiction and not go to court or do I still have to go to court

I think it's, this is a motion to challenge jurisdiction or this one's a motion to do

Yeah. On what premise did you challenge jurisdiction?

well, I'm owed this deduction and this rightfully I can claim. If you don't challenge jurisdiction and you're not in their jurisdiction,

When you challenge jurisdiction, it's my understanding that they have to address it and they can't railroad you if you properly.

But what you can do is not challenge jurisdiction and they can act like they have it.

Once you challenge jurisdiction, it's not the plaintiff or the opposing party that must prove jurisdiction.

a way for me to challenge jurisdiction because it's not enough that you're in the jurisdiction

Like you said, you can challenge jurisdiction at any time in perpetuity.

motion and I want to challenge jurisdiction but first of all I'm not

the ability to challenge jurisdiction unless you can disprove one or both of

That's why everybody that has a bar card is forbidden to make certain arguments in court, to challenge jurisdiction of a judge, and to always say the state is right.

in the JP. How did you challenge jurisdiction? I filed an affidavit challenging standing

could he challenge jurisdiction in writing as a defendant to it and win that way

If you challenge jurisdiction, then jurisdiction is lost.

I challenge jurisdiction due to the warrant insufficient status.

What particularly there, can you restate where or what type of statute or anything that we could go by or what premise we're going to challenge jurisdiction?

I'm here to challenge jurisdiction. Well, I'm not going to hear a challenge to jurisdiction. I've got it. And that's all that matters. The judge can't declare the existence of jurisdiction.

Can any party challenge jurisdiction?

Well, yeah, because they're saying that I can't file, I can't challenge jurisdiction because it's a hybrid.

you can only use that for a challenge jurisdiction in some form.

that's all they can do in this case he has a fact they are going to challenge jurisdiction

challenge jurisdiction technically that's all you everyone knows that walking is great

putting two different challenges in there. You can challenge jurisdiction for multiple

once it is challenged if you stood in front of the court and said i challenge jurisdiction

Once you challenge jurisdiction, jurisdiction is lost.

When you challenge jurisdiction, the judge no longer had it.

I would probably drop over dead if I ever saw an attorney challenge jurisdiction right out of the gate.

wouldn't challenge jurisdiction.

But once you challenge jurisdiction,

So, okay, first thing you do is challenge jurisdiction.

challenge jurisdiction, it doesn't matter, you cannot give them jurisdiction that they

don't have. So you can challenge jurisdiction at any time, no matter how remote in history.

So there may be a way to challenge jurisdiction over the person, the individual, but it is

So we really can't call it an impersonal jurisdiction challenge, although it does challenge jurisdiction

Well, you can't challenge jurisdiction in an administrative suit that's gone to judgment. You failed. You didn't challenge it within the time limit. Personal jurisdiction is presumed. That's the problem with administrative judgments. It's also the reason why judicial review is so important.

When you challenge jurisdiction, the person who's doing the challenging doesn't have any burden of proof.

So then we just tried to challenge jurisdiction, but apparently we didn't do it correctly because

So when you want to challenge jurisdiction, what do you say?

So always challenge jurisdiction

to properly challenge jurisdiction?

Well, when I challenge jurisdiction, I'm not talking about, I'm not that name.

Well, what do you propose as an alternate way to challenge jurisdiction?

Challenge jurisdiction, obviously, but the mismatch here could be enough to get the judge to just dismiss it because that's going to be alleging elements of some different subsection

In other words, you and I start from the position of a willingness to challenge jurisdiction.