Rule of Law Radio Archive Search Engine

Aggravated perjury is in the works.

the facts to you it's it's not perjury it's fraud. Oh boy. Which goes to

for aggravated perjury for making a material statement in the citation that's untrue

and under perjury you don't have to prove at which time the person committed perjury

You cannot be charged with perjury if you recant.

That doesn't go to the crime directly, so you can't commit perjury by lying about any

perjury malicious prosecution and don't roll over for them, it's going to go away. The

And you go back and charge him with impersonating a judicial officer. You charge him with perjury on his oath, aggravated perjury when he filed his oath,

maybe to commit perjury if you are to say what's your birth date, what state you're born in,

Perjury is when you deliberately misrepresent a fact.

Perjury goes to intent.

I said, they can't get you for perjury if you can't remember nothing

Perjury there.

Okay, this is where you go after the officer for aggravated perjury and you sue him.

Perjury only goes to statements of material fact made under oath and stating that a statute doesn't apply to him.

So, no, I don't think we could get him for aggravated perjury on that.

And I was arrested for criminal trespass. Now, that's aggravated perjury on its face.

was that every single FBI agent in the case had committed massive perjury before the judge.

produced all the evidence showing the massive perjury involved in this case.

for providing false information or perjury to the court?

perjury because it contains false statements and the officer would have to know that they

So once again, we now have a faulty complaint and that results in aggravated perjury because

Aggravated perjury goes to a false statement of a material fact.

So it was aggravated perjury actually.

And it is not made under penalty of perjury and oath

So it's very unlikely that if anyone subpoenaed to this meeting, it's very unlikely they would commit aggravated perjury on the stand

but, you know, a perjury and good things like that,

And on top of that, since the officer has signed a sworn statement to that effect, he has committed aggravated perjury because he has made at least three presumptions of fact that he does not have firsthand knowledge of, yet he has sworn that he does.

So once the officer gets on the stand and says that I am operating a motor vehicle, he has committed perjury under oath for the second time.

an SOB yes judge I can and I immediately filed aggravated perjury charges against it now

will charge him with aggravated perjury for lying to the.

perjury against the officers whose, you don't even care who it was that secured the warrant,

Yeah, well, aggravated perjury isn't very minor, but it does seem to be the most obvious

And you file the criminal complaint of perjury against him

Showing the perjury of the...or at least opening that door

If they sign on the dotted line under penalty of perjury that they are declaring that this is the tax assessment

Well no what you want to do is you want an original certified signed under penalty of perjury assessment

Because there was no valid assessment signed under penalty of perjury accompanying the information I received

Well again the paperwork they sent you did not contain a signed under penalty of perjury assessment

Okay if there's no signed under penalty of perjury assessment for taxes owed or taxes owing

Without a signed under penalty of perjury assessment for all these taxes

They either, if they deny one of them and you can prove that it is actually true, you file aggravated perjury against them.

Perjury against their oath of office.

of perjury and sworn to and put in the record that i was driving a motor vehicle at the

the statement that you committed assault against them is aggravated perjury on its face.

I said, I'm going to elicit perjury from this officer.

perjury and tampering with a government document. He gave it to the county attorney who looked

a warrant anyway. He suborned perjury and he tampered with the government document.

I filed aggravated perjury against the guy who issued the original complaint.

I filed subordination of perjury against the county attorney.

Subordination of perjury against the county attorney, the district, the county judge who

which perjury is a criminal act, you can never usually get a judge if you make an objection that it is perjury

and file a criminal complaint for perjury along with that declaration to get them to not accept it as evidence.

then you sign that document and there's penalty of perjury clause at the bottom

file for aggravated perjury because it contains false statements.

At the bottom it says, I declare under penalty of perjury that I am a U.S. citizen.

So if he commits aggravated perjury in the making of the criminal accusation, he is personally

for perjury and obstruction of justice.

I also wrote up an affidavit, a declaration, unsworn declaration under perjury of the events.

So I said in the unsworn declaration under perjury that I was forced to plead no low contender to the clerk, trial by clerk basically.

And then I wrote an affidavit and a declaration sworn under penalty of perjury without the United States

It's like where is the person signing under penalty of perjury that he witnesses, a competent fact witness, a dog cannot sign a statement, okay?

appeal not from shielding the officer against allegations of aggravated perjury for lying in

Because of the fact that they've issued that and stated under penalty of perjury that what they were reporting was taxable income when in fact it's not.

form and it has to be certified under penalties of perjury and then because a lot of the companies

Isn't it also under penalty of perjury as well?

me with the wedding signature of the contract, certified under the penalties of perjury by

with the wet ink signature, certified through perjury by the custodian of account. That�s

the defendant's lawyer. You're sworn in under penalty of perjury in front of an older republic,

perjury that was committed to when the first three and a half years danced with this guy.

penalties of perjury to accompany all documents produced for distribution would be as a sovereign

for aggravated perjury and things like this.

called perjury and fraud.

You have received validation in writing and certified proof under penalty of perjury for alleged debt.

Even if you commit aggravated perjury and lie like a dog, you cannot be sued, period

The marshal committee, if you have written aggravated perjury against the marshal, go for the marshal.

Three times the amount they would defraud you from plus cost, and aggravated perjury against the marshal,

chance did you commit perjury by signing a complaint stating that I was operating one of those motor

is committing aggravated perjury when he signs that complaint and files it in the court. End of story.

aggravated perjury in this case, correct? That should make him look real good in front of the jury,

And how many aggravated perjury charges have you filed against her?

Yeah, if it's going to keep an aggravated perjury charge off their head,

Aggravated perjury in Texas is a felony.

It's up to the other side to accuse us of perjury and then let them prove it.

because you are going under penalty of perjury and we need to stand in the

Opened perjury in the courtroom in front of a judge and he did nothing.

And aggravated perjury is a first-degree, is a third-degree felony.

Yet they're stealing it, they committed open perjury in the court

because no officer of the court notary will put their butt on the line to go to prison for perjury and whatever else, because that's not who they really say they are.

So did you file perjury against her for the...or tamper with the government document for the filing?

makes it legal. And you signed that affidavit under penalty of perjury that the contents

perjury of oath

thing under sworn you know penalty of perjury under oath type of stuff and got the limited

Yes, and you could move for perjury on the part of her.

Well, I was going to do that too for perjury because according to Missouri state law, if

You can't be charged with aggravated perjury though, Randy

Versus the aggravated perjury is a felony

committing, in my opinion, blatant perjury to the grand jury,

That would be absolute fraud and perjury if you couldn't get around that.

who's going to assign under penalty of perjury that what happened was true and correct?

there may be a charge of aggravated perjury in there.

and signing a notarized affidavit under penalty of perjury to that effect.

Here's where I got it and sign it under penalty of perjury or prove it or else to me, I'm not going to stand by it and say that I agree that it's true.

Yeah, you charge him with possession, then you charge him with aggravated perjury for falsifying a charge.

sense under penalty of perjury or used as evidence in court that if somebody says something

Okay, did he file aggravated perjury against whoever made the statement?

So just exactly where is this officer thinking his proof is evident and that he's not going to get slapped with an aggravated perjury charge?

Is it true, officer, that you signed this ticket under penalty of perjury and

put that complaint under penalty of perjury that all the information you

Now, the aggravated perjury comes in, once again,

The one who wrote the citation, that's aggravated perjury on its face.

perjury or submitting false information on a government document, and it even says on

or a sign under penalty of perjury or any of these things,

complaint under penalty of perjury notarized.

Aggravated perjury on which part?

then they're supposed to actually verify that under penalty of perjury that they had it and they lost it.

Perjury and also the judge was finding me in contempt for saying that I was the

Well, it's not only called conversion, but it's aggravated perjury also for swearing to facts that are untrue and knowingly untrue.

There's aggravated kidnapping, official oppression, aggravated perjury and tampering with a government document

It's for declaring that you are telling the truth under penalty of perjury that you saw

that in and of itself would appear to be an aggravated perjury statement

officer, aggravated perjury and a couple other things.

Exactly. I and my name hereby swear under penalty of perjury that I have, that I believe and have reason to believe

act of perjury or aggravated perjury. Number nine, this argument exists because the complaint

perjury and containing a knowingly false misrepresentation and inference by the accuser is proof positive

and sworn under penalty of perjury that its entire contents is true and correct and it's

him of failing to speak with candor to the court and committing aggravated perjury by

You should file aggravated perjury against the cops.

Either somebody committed perjury on the witness stand, or the video was tampered with.

Then you can slap perjury charges on them.

that in fact did not occur, then that's aggravated perjury because those complaints were signed

Well, aggravated perjury for trying to write this down as you said.

want to look and see if there is one for uh aggravated perjury because in a court document

sworn under oath and penalty of perjury if that's swearing at least in texas law and i'm pretty

and it is aggravated perjury okay here it says if they make or subscribe a false statement which

Defendants lawyers where I caught him committing perjury in one of his court papers

aggravated perjury when you signed the complaint against me or did you commit aggravated perjury

If I can get her to indicate any doubt, now I've got her for aggravated perjury and malicious prosecution.

that there was perjury involved, because there

Well, no, perjury is something that's done under oath.

OK, if that's the relationship, then that's not perjury or fraud

it has in a case. The test of perjury is extremely important. The test of sufficiency of whether the

is whether or not the affidavit can support a conviction for perjury based upon whether or not

I don't think there's a single servicer out there who would risk perjury claiming that they have agency for the principal.

And it can be from a few years up to 15 years I've seen in one case where a class one or first degree perjury can have a penalty of up to 15 years.

Could that be like, say for example, the language from 28 U.S.C. Section 1746 where it says, I we declare or certify, verify or state under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that these facts are true and correct?

Oh, they got a problem, you need to file aggravated perjury against these guys?

whoever uses them commits perjury and now they've got a much bigger charge to worry about. And I

In this affidavit, you're going to certify under penalty of perjury that you are of sound

The purpose of the affidavit is you're swearing under penalty of perjury you were there.

swear to the following, swear or affirm the following under penalty of perjury that I

with perjury for making it.

But by operational law, it's really legal because we got the perjury clause there.

Perjury is not criminal?

You filed a claim that the attorney committed perjury with the professional governing agency,

I think we've got to start, Randy, doing more work on perjury of oath.

And not only that, the clerk is, has just committed perjury also.

are committing perjury and they don't even want the police to know that, or the people

Why didn't your attorney object and charge them with perjury on the stand?

and charging these officers with perjury on the witness stand at the time during the trial,

You better start charging these guys with perjury right now or I am going to sue your

that was not the case. So he's either committing perjury through the signing of the contract

or he'll be committing perjury in court if he testifies that way.

perjury in the original hearing and the judge actually bought my issue in this case that

assessment document under penalty of perjury did they no too damn bad for that individual again

They sent me a... This is what they did. They sent me an affidavit telling me that they certified under penalty of perjury that they sent me 138 letters saying that they substituted the...

aggravated perjury is a felony in most states and just because he's a judge he has no immunity

order with over 200 counts of perjury in it in which she just simply lied her behind off

Well, I filed this affidavit accusing him of perjury and treason.

Well, it can only be signed under penalty of perjury if someone verifies it.

But they can't say that you're swearing under penalty of perjury just by signing it and then hold you on account.

And when you take it, they want the employees to submit a waiver that they're not going to hold the company responsible and that you attest on an affidavit under penalty of perjury that you're taking the vaccine voluntarily.

Because you get to cross-examine him on that perjury and show that he committed it.

by lying to the court, committing perjury before the court, or it may be more appropriate to go after the attorney in the civil sense

And go ahead and file criminal charges against the attorney for aggravated perjury and against the judge.

of perjury that day.

So just make an affidavit, get it notarized, sworn to under penalty of perjury that I'm taking this out of your hands.

says I certify and declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington

Okay and it cannot be signed under penalty of perjury unless it is sworn to in front

of penalty of perjury when they tick somebody off because the other individual they ticked

of perjury that everything in it is true and correct.

The complaint cannot be signed under penalty of perjury because it does not require the

lo and behold, it says under penalties of perjury and you got to sign the thing.

The only time something is perjury is when you misstate a material fact.

You would have no, no problem with perjury on a general question of that nature.

of perjury that what you stated in your document is true and the only thing they are notarizing,

the affidavit is insufficient to support the claim of aggravated perjury against them

court concerning a material fact that's aggravated perjury that's also

And that that they had to produce a witness who could testify under penalty of perjury that I had injured them and or damaged the property.

perjury, and sometimes there's a penalty of perjury on the criminal complaint also.

The state of Kansas, Mr. or Mrs., has anyone from the state of Kansas built out a sworn complaint and signed to it under penalty of perjury other than the prosecutor attempting to act?

Because nobody can file that complaint without committing perjury because nobody saw you do it.

Because whoever signs that complaint is committing aggravated perjury because no one

And in their affidavit, I count at least 14 perjury statements.

That should get aggravated perjury charges against.

Yes, I'm putting aggravated perjury charges

So there's a pretty significant number of aggravated perjury counts

That makes his swearing out of that complaint an act of aggravated perjury on the complaint.

If you commit aggravated perjury and you recant your perjury before the perjury becomes obvious.

But before it's clear that the perjury will come out, then you can't be charged with aggravated perjury.

the evidence under penalty of perjury and under oath.

I mean, this guy was testifying under penalty of perjury to facts that he was alleging that

Does it say anywhere on there, I sign this under penalty of perjury where the officer

The criminal complaint does not have to specify under penalty of perjury because a hearsay

Okay, in the case of a traffic citation, does it meet all of the criteria that the statute says a charging instrument must have and then does the requirement exist that such an instrument must be sworn to under oath or penalty of perjury or something of that nature?

They can't commit perjury on a document just because it's not going to be filed with the court.

They don't get to come in court and give different perjury testimony

So I'm looking at, effectively, a perjury request against him.

Well, yeah, that and promise is under penalty of perjury including the fact that I will go home after three terms

I Randall Kalkin here and after referred to as complainant under penalty of perjury do state that I have personal knowledge.

to verify this document and not be committing aggravated perjury when the document, when

acted with intent to deceive and with knowledge of the statement's meaning for the purpose of prosecution for aggravated perjury under 37.03 of the penal code.

A person commits an offense if he commits perjury as defined in 3702,

And then you come back and you move against them for perjury and you move to strike whatever testimony was made that was perjurious

Oh, well then. Okay, Randy, explain to me what constitutes aggravated perjury as opposed to just perjury.

That is a good question. Aggravated perjury goes to lying about a material fact. And to state the difference between the two, I'd have to go back and read the nuance of the code.

Even though, you know, he stated that that was aggravated perjury because that was a material fact.

Well, there's perjury and there's aggravated perjury.

We have a perjury statement.

You can only commit perjury by falsely testifying to a material fact.

and suborning of perjury by Defendant Council as well as enuminal delay tactics.

law to see if it's aggravated perjury if the party lies to you.

It's aggravated perjury if he lies to the court.

If you want to purchase a firearm from an FFL dealer, you have to certify under penalty of perjury that you are a U.S. citizen.

And yes, you have to attest under penalty of perjury that you are a U.S. citizen, but they will not sell you the gun.

Is it signed as being true and correct under penalty of perjury by someone at the taxing

penalty of perjury in order for you to disqualify that judge, but you can make the verbal motion

so they're not involved, and you could not be charged with perjury for coming to the wrong conclusion,

Okay, that's okay. No, you wouldn't file aggravated perjury against the assistant district attorney.

had under oath, thus committing aggravated perjury and did so with specific malicious

He committed perjury and he said he did it because he was aided and abetted by Prosecutor Crane to lie about his witness testimony.

Well, if that's the case, well, people don't realize that if you commit perjury in Missouri in a murder case

Well, is he being prosecuted for perjury right now?

Okay. But as far as perjury or anything like that, there's nothing of that nature. So long

So it's not aggravated perjury. You can't go to perjury with it.

Well, yeah, we have to do that as part of our job. So someone pays you to sign a document under penalty of perjury that all the information in it is true and correct.

So my friend's second question could have been then in order to protect the integrity of the court, I would move the court to charge this gentleman with contempt of court, perpetrating fraud upon the court and aggravated perjury because he's made statements under oath during an official proceeding about facts that are relevant to that proceeding, their material.

Who signed and swore under penalty of perjury the information and the ticket was true and correct?

So I went back to them and said, look, you guys want me to sign this under penalty of perjury saying I understand it.

by me repeatedly throughout the case, you know, sworn under penalty of perjury stuff

the affiant must swear under the penalty of perjury of the laws of the state of California

So they had to commit outright perjury and fraud in the Third Court to the 90.

File aggravated perjury tampering with a government document against the officer malicious prosecution and false imprisonment aggravated assault.

And we accused the buyer of the property of tampering with a government document, aggravated perjury and executing a document by deception

And possibly even getting charged with aggravated perjury in the process

perjury for you. That's a big deal. That'll get him in prison for quite a while.

See, because the way they worded it in the affidavit, it says that so-and-so, the affiants were under perjury or everything, that they have first knowledge of that account.

And in that affidavit, he claimed under penalty of perjury that they had never received any written communication from me prior to that lawsuit.

Well, it's because they committed perjury when they were in trial.

What you do is you file perjury charges against some criminal charges.

And then you come back and say, because they committed perjury, their perjury harmed me this way and denied me due process.

to swear under penalty of perjury that all this is correct. Most of them don't have that

I like that. It'll only be aggravated perjury if the fact was material to the outcome of the case.

Okay, then that would go to perjury. It would go to aggravated perjury if you could show that the fact that he did or did not know who the owners were was material to the outcome of the case.

Okay, file against the lawyer for perjury and file a bar grievance against the lawyer. You might consider a malpractice suit against the lawyer.

There's no way out of it because he already swore under penalty of perjury that he did it

But I've got the lawyer for Bank of America swearing under penalty of perjury that my mortgage was assigned to Bank of America on July 28, 2009

I've got the fraud closure attorney Susan C. Little swearing under penalty of perjury that I defaulted on my mortgage in January of 2009

And best way – I found the best way to respond to that is to say, well, if he's – you know, if he's swearing that in an affidavit, you need to be looking at him for perjury and you don't need – you don't need me.

And it's the document you're asserting is perjurious. So essentially, he's admitted to the perjury that you claim.

Aggravated perjury and tampering with a government document. Take those to the district attorney.

The aggravated perjury, Randi, the aggravated perjury is Texas Penal Code, Section 37.03.

Aggravated perjury tampered with the government document.

You go down and file aggravated perjury charges against the officer,

So I went down to the courthouse to have the perjury charges and saw a judge.

and in petition for, you know, file aggravated perjury charges against whoever did that.

how often they bother going after perjury cases that are not criminal?

And I said, man, this is subordinated perjury here. And she said, well, just go to that state website and start there.

That's where perjury comes to mind.

It is not trial de novo for the purpose of shielding this officer from aggravated perjury charges.

And the affidavit is under oath, so that goes to aggravated perjury if they're not careful.

trust. It went into the perjury in the assignments and the appointments. It went

Mine's on perjury charges in Utah and I'm down in Texas

and he committed perjury like three times.

I said, besides Judge, I said, your trooper there committed perjury three times,

and I'm still waiting for you to, you know, hold him for perjury here.

And the perjury was evident on the face of the document.

She also committed aggravated perjury because her affidavit was verified.

Those are penal crimes. File criminal charges against them for aggravated perjury tampering with the government document.

And in this case, we're charging those who prepared verified affidavits with aggravated perjury tampering with a government document because their affidavits were fraudulent.

So that's going to go to aggravated perjury tampering with government document on every one of those

of perjury and that had the effect of denying your son due process.

But if you have both of them, that's subordination, a perjury on the part of the prosecutor, aggravated

perjury on the part of the police officer, and denial of due process by the judge.

Perjury is just before tampering.

The reason for it is, is because that's the only place where perjury can be committed

That's why Texas law requires that the tax assessment be done in person by the inspector and be signed under penalty of perjury that is true and accurate.

committed aggravated perjury by placing a statement on the document that was untrue

um then he aggravated perjury is a felony here in the state of texas then he filed that document

perjury he filed the document with a materially false statement and intended that the statement

aggravated perjury felony, tampering with a government document felony,

Forgery and aggravated perjury brought upon the court.

on the record under penalty of perjury whom are you representing in court today are you representing

record on the records under penalty of perjury whom is mr wild representing representing the

There's the perjury official misconduct

But if they did then I would charge them with perjury and official misconduct

Then you charge that accuser with perjury or official misconduct

All right, got two questions, one will be rehashing some of the perjury issues, but

Back to the perjury thing.

and of course, as we all know, perjury is covered in state statutes.

outside of income tax evasion, perjury is probably the most under-prosecuted crime in America.

Now, it would strike me that perjury is one of those kinds of things

to raise this thing as a nullity as far as perjury goes?

I don't think perjury or aggravated perjury is going to nullify anything

so does that nullify the perjury law?

But because we've got this perjury statute, of course, that doesn't exist.

So here in Texas, there's a difference between simple perjury and aggravated perjury,

Aggravated perjury in Texas is a felony, as where perjury is not a felony.

Simple perjury is not a felony.

The perjury statute, it's pretty clear, and the charming gem in this whole thing is

There's no jurat and it's not sworn to under penalty of perjury despite the fact that there's

articles of agreement, or release of mortgage a certificate signed under penalties of perjury and fraud by said mortgagee,

i.e. the perjury in the court we're just going to treat it as okay?

He commits aggravated perjury or simple perjury, but he cannot lie.

Well, I can't really touch the perjury per se because perjury is a criminal issue

This is how perjury works. If there are two inconsistent statements, one mutually exclusive of the other, in an allegation of perjury, you don't have to prove which one was perjurious, only that one must have been.

The one said they didn't exist. The other said they did exist. Both of the statements were material that should get an aggravated perjury accusation.

But that wouldn't go to perjury anyway.

Because I got, I got listed perjury in a, in a, in a.

And on that slip of paper it says that I swear under penalty of perjury that I have rescinded my social security number and no longer use that number for any purpose

They're claiming you of committing perjury of some sort or putting your toes up to it.

It's got to be sworn under the penalty of perjury that everything is within your personal knowledge and true, accurate, and correct.

Perjury falls on your shoulders because you made the statements that you could not afford it, and you showed financial records that attempted to prove that you cannot afford it, but yet you can.

Okay. Very quickly. Penal Code Chapter 37. Perjury or other falsifications.

This witness is committing aggravated perjury at this point.

not for the purpose of shielding this officer from charges of aggravated perjury for lying

Expirated perjury is a felony in most states.

Either they committed aggravated perjury when they made the statement, or, I mean if they

property? Yes. Then that's suborning perjury right there. That is suborning perjury.

that's a morning perjury and that can send them to prison.

will the perjury be on record?

And she may say something about the perjury, the obvious perjury or whatever.

Well, you can't prosecute them for perjury if they recant the perjury

before it's apparent that the perjury will come out if you recant.

I was thinking if I don't raise my hand and I go into a jury room and I do that, are they going to be able to charge me with perjury or something?

As a matter of fact, in the traffic courts, it seems the courts prefer perjury to the

you have to sign it under penalty of perjury that the facts asserted are true and correct

They commit perjury and aggravated perjury, aggravated perjury in the state being a felony.

So the prospect of the penalty of perjury should not be the overriding concern

lawyer for committing aggravated perjury in the courtroom?

perjury in the courtroom.

They commit perjury and they offer fraudulent misrepresentations of material facts, but they

If you kept on committing aggravated perjury or even perjury, that breaches their code

it says, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct

well he'd have to get indicted on a felony i guess um aggravated perjury okay he he presented

uh aggravated perjury being a felony now he can be indicted on that felony if that one attorney

Attorneys, on the other hand, commit perjury, aggravated perjury depending on how it's presented,

So once they step across the line, you get to carry them back to the beginning and defeat everything. And if you go after this prosecutor for perjury and the judge for subordination of perjury, and that should be paid attention to.

The only issue in the end is going to become, did he commit aggravated perjury or did he not?

aggravated perjury and I'll do that in the next talks I'll file if I do, but they were

perjury as an affidavit.

And that's aggravated perjury because she's under oath.

He commits aggravated perjury all in one step.

Now we come back and say, well, we committed aggravated perjury when we did that.

Well, not only that, but under Pennsylvania law, aggravated perjury is grounds for recalculation.

Yes, perjury to get out of a traffic ticket.

So he asked, you know, I'm not sure if that's perjury or not, but you know, it could very

Yeah, the question I really have is the fact that it was a subordination of perjury situation

Yes. It's only perjury if it's material.

It's only perjury if you lied about a material fact, the fact that matters.

Okay. And it's only aggravated perjury if that was done with the intent to cause harm to the individual by the action.

Did you file criminal charges for aggravated perjury against the prosecutor?

But could that be considered aggravated perjury since it's material?

Now, they've committed aggravated perjury in a lot of ways on that citation if several

You sue the lawyer for the aggravated perjury as though it's their fault.

However, if the lawyer commits aggravated perjury while representing a client, he does so to

by the other side and make claims against the lawyer for perjury against you.

Perjury go to fraud per se.

That's ordination of perjury at Section 1620.

and how we can turn that perjury into subordination of perjury.

Is this perjury, is it perjury if it is a lie by omission?

are are actually perjury and I had put that in my motion before etc

Her name shows up in a federal document, five-year perjury for anybody filling it out, where

An affiant there has to be defined very loosely because, again, it's not actually sworn under penalty of perjury as to be true and correct

A complaint does not contain any language referencing a penalty of perjury because no one can be charged with perjury for making a complaint based upon what they believe may be the problem

But it's just like we were talking about the aggravated perjury that the attorneys had committed.

and it's just clear and obvious, you know, perjury under those circumstances,

Question, if I sue both, in fact, of the attorneys and their respective firms, I guess, for perjury in this case,

Just sue them for perjury or suborning perjury.

The lawyer committed perjury before the court.

and they commit perjury by not honoring their own.

perjury or issue of the note, like you and I talked about, that wipes out everything, that's when they can actually hear a state judgment.

under the Pains and Penalties of Perjury and which displays a proper jurat.

that he committed aggravated perjury because you weren't in commerce

or aggravated perjury where he stated under oath that he had reason to believe and did believe he

And that, you know, later on the plaintiff's attorneys had actually committed aggravated perjury stating...

I have the Wisconsin Perjury and False Swearing Criminal Statutes.

Yeah, I'm looking at, you know, whether civil action for perjury, and I keep coming across that there's no action lies to recover damages caused by perjury in the majority of states.

You can't, you mean perjury on its face may not create a cause of action.

But if the jury believes you, and based on that lie, they render a ruling that then harms me, my claim is the harm caused by the perjury, not the perjury itself.

Yeah, the perjury did you no harm.

And the court suborned that perjury after being given notice and evidence

Nobody takes them on that way. This is aggravated perjury tampering with the government document.

Tampering is generally a felony. Aggravated perjury is certainly a felony.

This is something that's only criminal and aggravated perjury and wrong and invalid and void on its face based on the law in the state of Arkansas from what I understand.

Should you file criminal charges against the officer the lawyer for perjury or did you say you or you say?

As a perjury and

So in this case, I assume I've got an aggravated perjury action

Okay let me explain that one, perjury in a judicial proceeding is privileged, and that's

This is what we were addressing, one exception was perjury and I was explaining why you can't

and then suborning perjury from that police officer as a judge in collusion with the city attorney, as the prosecutor,

I won in 2014, it was reopened through aggravated perjury and the judge being a accessory to

He can't claim he is regardless. So with the judge adjudicating these allegations from a police officer, having to know that they are false and then suborning perjury from that police officer as a judge in collusion with the city attorney, as the prosecutor, we have a criminal conspiracy and collusion.

the judge that he was committing aggravated perjury and the judge didn't do anything about

And subordination of perjury is 18 U.S. Code 4.

That continuance must be signed under oath and penalty of perjury to be valid.

and there's nothing but ambiguity and basically aggravated perjury coming from the lawyers.

based on some aggravated perjury on the part of the plaintiff's attorneys.

It's one of those laws kind of like perjury in the courtroom.

perjury and have them all be parties here, I think.

of perjury lying in court, and I was wondering, is there some case law hanging out there in

the wings that has it where the idea of perjury is the legislature stepping into the realm

in their client's favor, even if it's not in their client's favor, so if perjury were

professional liars not wanting perjury prosecuted, but then that goes back to you and me.

prosecution of perjury, when we give the judge notice of perjury and the judge fails to act,

It doesn't sound like there is anything hanging in the weeds in perjury as far as someone

I think subordination of perjury is a great one.

He said, oh, well, they might be pressing perjury charges.

There might be also perjury charges.

Perjury charges?

Where you get perjury charges from, you know what I'm saying, evasion and arrest?

So they're saying that you committed perjury by not filing the cards that you are apparently suing for.

And then he says, oh well, they might press perjury charges.

I said, perjury charges?

Perjury charges.

so they said that they might file perjury charges.

about what the DBA is thinking about doing about filing perjury charges against me.

perjury charges?

perjury so they became government documents and when the prosecutor said why you need

regard to what you're charged with if they committed aggravated perjury that's

when he didn't need to if he lied on the report you charge him with perjury in a

they committed aggravated perjury in the state court.

Then you might do, well, first thing to do is file aggravated perjury charges against them with the DA.

Aggravated perjury or tampering with the government document.

that piece of paper is not signed under penalty of perjury like that criminal affidavit would

How about if... I also was reading that underneath the facts of the Brady List that the officer's perjury is unlike a statement that's not true.

Something like when they make the perjury false statement. Are you familiar with that?

I mean like perjury is when you have a false statement, when you write a false statement.

Okay, hold on. Perjury is more than that. In order for a statement to be perjurious, you must lie about a material fact.

Okay. Yeah, that's a material fact. A hat on a blue hat. If it's not about hats, it's not a material fact. If someone is presenting perjury testimony and you know it's perjury testimony and you allow it, that's subordination to perjury.

Trying to suborn perjury by an officer is not grounds for secreting his perjurious nature.

Just look up perjury and talk about what's material and what's not.

I'm going to have to file aggravated perjury against every one of them.

committed aggravated perjury in that first trial and you were ruled against based on that aggravated

perjury that is a fee to complain that is a done deal it is too late for them to recant

it if you commit aggravated perjury and you recant that perjury before it becomes obvious

that the statement was perjurious then you're not guilty of aggravated perjury in your case

aggravated perjury okay because he witnessed it and he had reason to believe that apparently he

was a she now this uh aggravated perjury is this a separate thing i have to file oh yeah this is

once you're charging them with aggravated perjury from their false testimony in the first trial

and you need you need to construct a good case for aggravated perjury it doesn't have to be

aggravated perjury to complete hearsay doesn't have to be that best witness

and commit perjury if they didn't give any answers.

But in Texas, all requests for continuance must be signed under penalty of perjury before a notary.

aggravated perjury charges against these individuals yet? Not yet. Why not?

him criminal charges against these people for aggravated perjury in the

Two days, that's aggravated perjury against the officer.

with perjury and the courts don't care, they're not going to do squat.

promissory note that if they if they swear on the penalty of perjury that the

Okay. I also get the aggravated perjury for the clerk because she said upon release, I was never in custody, so they're saying upon release as far as I'm in custody.

And if he did it to me, I would file aggravated perjury charges against him immediately.

or to provide to respondent a written affidavit of facts sworn to under penalty of perjury as to why the requirement of such license does not apply to an investigator employed by or contracted with the TCEQ.

And he said, can I see your summons? And I showed him my summons and the summons on the bottom said that basically this is sort of like an affidavit under the penalties of perjury by the person who issued the summons.

Okay, you have a document that at the bottom says I hereby certify or state under penalty of perjury and then they had to sign it, right?

Because if someone is signing an affidavit under penalty of perjury about a set of facts that they do not have personal knowledge of, then they just committed perjury.

first degree felony aggravated perjury against the accused. Now you took the Class C misdemeanor

of perjury juror at, specifically so he could not get charged with that crime if somebody

That's, that's, that's perjury, maybe aggravated perjury since this ticket is material to the case.

and it certainly wouldn't be any type of perjury for you're not telling them.

them in front of the court. Because the thing about aggravated perjury is you can recant.

testimony. This is pretty outrageous. Now, as aggravated perjury goes, there's a good chance

along with an affidavit and an accusation of aggravated perjury against both the officers,

I would charge them all with conspiracy, with aggravated perjury and malicious prosecution.

perjury and intentionally using evidence he knows to be false to get a conviction.

Perjury, as you stated, aggravated perjury in conspiring with one another to have the

A defense, an affirmative defense to aggravated perjury is that you recanted the perjury statement

before it became apparent that the perjury statement would be revealed.

documents and he went in today and accused the bailiffs of aggravated perjury and claimed he

perjury and then produced incontrovertible evidence of aggravated perjury. So now the prosecutor's

We just had James near Houston go into court and the prosecuting attorney did a dance to get him to drop his claims against two bailiffs that we had absolute concrete evidence committed aggravated perjury in their affidavits.

officer committed aggravated perjury and you have evidence to establish it,

We just prepare an aggravated perjury charge against the police officer, file it along

Aggravated perjury is a lot more serious.

He conspired with the city attorney to commit aggravated perjury and malicious prosecution

I'll also put in a tag that tells it to create a aggravated perjury accusation against the officer.

That should be plenty. That goes to aggravated perjury on part of the officer.

Oath being penalty of perjury that the statements made on that citation are true and correct,

And the other person's going, yep, the person who's saying they swore that this under penalty of perjury is the person that signed it.

If he can't support that his act is one of aggravated perjury and the prosecutor almost certainly got him to do it.

That's aggravated perjury on its face.

Because if you don't, and say the clerk rescins her statement, or they change their statements around, then it's not aggravated perjury anymore.

If they can rescind it before it's obvious that the perjury will be outed, then they can't be charged with it.

of perjury take it down there and get it filed in the court case but just put on it notice of

It is not a sworn instrument. It is not signed under penalty of perjury by persons having

If the officer committed aggravated perjury on the citation, then that's an act of a denial of due process. Due process rings equally in the state as in the Fed.

You send them a complaint against the officer for committing aggravated perjury on a traffic citation that he obviously did not understand the law that he was purporting to enforce.

Okay, there's this thing called an affidavit that you sign in front of a notary under penalty of perjury that says, I was never engaged in any commercial use of the highways.

This is how aggravated perjury works

Aggravated perjury is only aggravated perjury

And you don't want to give him an opportunity to recant his perjury until he's already perjured himself in front of a jury

acts of aggravated perjury and forgery.

Because the arresting officer, he'd made perjury and aggravated perjury.

Perjury when he lied under oath, aggravated perjury whenever he lied on papers that were going through a court.

Aggravated perjury occurs when it was done under oath, whether verbally or in writing.

Perjury is when you put it down without being under oath or swearing to it but giving false answers anyway.

So that's the difference between perjury and aggravated perjury.

Aggravated perjury can only occur when a person is under oath to tell the truth and does not.

That hints those things constitute aggravated perjury if they're wrong and you know they're wrong.

Whereas that's why the criminal complaint itself is not signed under penalty of perjury in any capacity.

And since perjury can only be done under oath based upon personal knowledge and the criminal complaint is not required to be signed by someone with personal knowledge, the two do not go together.

Okay, so those things would constitute aggravated perjury if they're done with the intent to harm another.

However, if the officer falsifies any of the elements of that charge in the written instrument, that is perjury and aggravated perjury. That is a crime.

which means this guy committed aggravated perjury when he signed it.

Whoever made the perjury statements.

And this individual came into this hearing and committed aggravated perjury in order to deny you any right.

then you accuse him of aggravated perjury and he either looks at facing aggravated perjury or produces the proof.

the officer accusing the officer of aggravated perjury and of retaliation and when he goes in

That becomes a res judicata, the fact that they committed perjury is already been determined.

lying under oath, testifying falsely in court and committing aggravated perjury by doing

then we'll file aggravated perjury against them.

Did your friend file aggravated perjury against the officer?

It's only aggravated perjury if it's under oaths before a governmental tribunal.

The perjury for, not for the Wisconsin information, but for claims.

for aggravated perjury and you don't want that to happen.

One of my other questions is perjury in the whole scheme of things from everything I've read.

one to go after. Okay, so there's aggravated perjury you say?

personally, and the lawyers for conspiracy to commit aggravated perjury and costing you

That was what I was talking about. That one's aggravated perjury on its face.

And while it's in the first instance, I have him charged with aggravated perjury and tampering with the government document.

And you did that within the time limit then he's got aggravated perjury on each one.

Yes. Okay. Now, remember, you have to notarize that under penalty of perjury that that's

be notarized. It has to have a penalty of perjury statement and the reason you're filing

know if I'm pretty sure you'd want to do it under penalty of perjury and everything that

on their penalty of perjury etc etc. When you talk to the notary ask them what kind of statement has

to be on there for them to notarize it under penalty of perjury blah blah blah as a sworn affidavit.

by swearing the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct a copy of a recording

the first case and the weirdness there, or suborned perjury there.

And then the prosecutor also subordinated the perjury of the witness in a deposition. So basically, I have evidence that's in the court record, or should be, of something that was said before, and then the statement made the deposition directly contradicts it.

All right, I don't know that perjury and so on would be a federal whatever.

If you can show the perjury was done in a court of law for the purpose of defrauding someone of a protected right,

And the prosecutor subordinated the perjury of a witness and a deposition.

the perjury of the alleged victim so i have my attorney on record admitting and agreeing to me

when it is not done under penalty of perjury and it is not signed under oath?

And it cannot be signed under oath without a penalty of perjury statement.

I want to accuse the prosecution of subordinate perjury from this witness I want this witness

charged with fraud and with aggravated perjury see how that's going to work out not to mention

Which was all blatant perjury upon all of their testimonies

Perjury is criminal. All crimes are specifically defined. It is only perjury if they sign under

That would be a deposition. Then he signs that and I believe that is definitely under perjury as well.

misstated a fact that he knew was wrong, that counts as perjury based on what you said. I love

conduct or civil. Okay. But, okay, lying or perjury or fraud, that's a different matter. Hang on.

It s like, it s trying to give me to commit perjury by mistaking something or mistaking

perjury is only perjury, if it is a deliberate misstatement of a material fact, it s not

perjury if it is material for the case, and then only if you deliberately lied for the

So it specifically says that you can commit aggravated perjury in court in the federal

So you can't charge them with perjury but you can charge them with official misconduct.

So nobody should be able to be charged for perjury ever again.

code of the state makes it a felony to commit aggravated perjury even if the state doesn't.

So maybe we should file aggravated perjury charges against the actor in a state grand

under a penalty of perjury and present it to a magistrate and get a case started, you

The way the way perjury works is it doesn't matter which statement is false.

I don't think aggravated perjury has a degree, you just perjury and aggravated perjury.

Now is it perjury and aggravated perjury or just aggravated perjury?

Perjury will come in one of two varieties, perjury or aggravated perjury.

And, you know, the difference between perjury and mistake is sometimes subtle, but it's significant.

There should be a piece of paper in there that someone signed saying that they certify under penalty of perjury that the opposing party was served.

We cannot be penalized for perjury and court, or that's what I got from reading Briscoe

And from that, you cannot be penalized for perjury if it stated that.

I think there was perjury there.

I'm going to file with the district and Rochester on that one. I'm also going to file some charges against him for allowing perjury in his courtroom and whatever else that I've got that I can file against him.

well yeah I think he committed perjury and aggravated perjury

because aggravated perjury is anything that will be involved in the court

perjury whenever you lie under oath

Number two, I believe strongly that it was perjury for several reasons.

Now, so you can't charge the cop with perjury for that, but I think you can with these other

I think that is perjury and I think you'll agree with that.

We got perjury on, you don't know which one was alive, but one of them had to be.

Once you have the police report, then you have aggravated perjury because it's in writing.

So if someone commits perjury and they recant that perjury before the perjurious nature of the statements are made known,

The perjury came from...

I need to now send them a under penalty of perjury application for a relief from default.

You can't charge him for perjury on that inconsistent statement because that was a retraction of the first statement.

It's a defense for him that he can say, oh, no, that wasn't perjury because he retracted it.

So if you allege aggravated perjury against the officer and allege that because he committed a criminal act in the process of the prosecution,

you can commit aggravated perjury on the stand and that doesn't disqualify you as a witness.

that it's fraudulent or it's a perjury once it becomes evident that it's perjury then he

committed aggravated perjury can hardly be construed as a credible witness so you move to

in this case the crime you allege he committed being aggravated perjury based on inconsistent

that you need this transcript to prove that the officer committed aggravated perjury by

Because this ticket was written and the complaint from the officer, you know, under penalty of perjury says that it was committed within the territory limits of the city.

So file, when it's strategic file aggravated perjury against them and fraud.

Again, the court is not going to pursue, but depending on how aggressive you want to be, you file aggravated perjury with the court.

But the aggravated perjury sounds like a route I will definitely look into, but I'm going to be filing something next week.

It says, okay, so you are going to subordinate perjury from your witness on the stand in open court.

Perjury because it was discovered, because it was called out for falsity

Did you file perjury charges against them with the special agent charge local FBI?

perjury charges against him with a local DA. Actually, with a grand

yeah, three different aggravated perjury against the judge with the county court judge.

and they're committing perjury in their papers and then our Supreme Court and the State Bar are doing nothing.

That is aggravated perjury and now you have proof of it.

Or actually you head that off and say the magistrate felt comfortable committing aggravated perjury and false imprisonment because the magistrate knew that he would be shielded from prosecution.

Is it still perjury if the witness for the prosecution wasn't sworn in yet?

Well, anyway, you charged perjury anyway.

against them there's two charges of perjury which i can prove well perjury is not a conduct complaint

perjury is a criminal right well yeah but i still want to file one anyway um to file the criminal

They offered me a affidavit to sign on the perjury and I said, you're not a court, I'm not going to sign an affidavit to you.

They wanted me to sign in the perjury saying I had what looked like credible coverage.

I said, I'm not going to swear on the perjury because maybe there's something I don't understand

penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Well, how can you have a proof

document, then that's tampering with a government document. So it doesn't matter, perjury or

the fact that they've perjured themselves. Perjury can be recanted. If you recant the

perjury before the perjurious nature of the statement becomes evident. So by filing the

And I said, you're not a court. I'm not going to sign an affidavit on the perjury deal.

I definitely noticed that. And I have filed more than one aggravated perjury charge. Brett,

You have to, when you commit perjury, you commit perjury by lying about a material fact.

It's not perjury at all.

If you commit aggravated perjury and you recant that perjury

So I left it so that I could then charge him with aggravated perjury and he couldn't recant.

Well, just one other observation about your perjury and aggravated perjury.

Retraction says in Penal Code 30705, it's a defense to aggravated perjury that the actor retracted his false statement before it became manifest that the falsity of the statement will be exposed.

So that just goes hand in hand with the thing about the perjury or it could be the same for forgery.

school that's aggravated perjury that's felony every state so they're committing felonies

perjury perjury and tampering with the government document now this is not one offense this is two

speeding how much i weigh is irrelevant so that is not perjury the the legal technical term for

that is beeping perjury perjury only applies to a material fact if i claim that i was not speeding

and i was speeding that is material and that would make it perjury so someone put on a complaint

because when you accuse him of aggravated perjury he's going to get apoplexy for accusing the

aggravated perjury and let him explain it to a grand jury randy we do have the of course

aggravated perjury the records the records have been obtained by the father which are have the

file against the principal for aggravated perjury not yet

introduce him to hardball charge him with aggravated perjury has nothing to do with the

The perjury and the mishandling of evidence and all of it.

So you can move to strike the second one and file aggravated perjury against the second one.

You mentioned aggravated perjury in the Jeff comp in the just discussion, and that really got my attention.

mother there was also there was perjury and I was making a clear distinction

that's aggravated perjury they happened at different times they're not that's

Which has a penalty of perjury and a bunch of other stuff saying, yep, this debt is 100% legit

Before that form with the penalty of perjury saying kicks in

So long as you don't commit perjury and lie about the facts, you can come to any conclusion you want to file the complaint.

of perjury if that were the case the best friend of an abused wife or husband could not file a

not under penalty of perjury and they cannot be a part of the court or the prosecutorial team when

courthouse the court of common please judge cited perjury statements by Magistrate Farrier

essentially mimics this one. Tina, have you looked up perjury in California law? Yes, and it's very

complete and involved than most of the states. But they all have laws against perjury and aggravated

then the federal court has no power to declare that to be perjury or to declare that to fall

under 80 U.S. Code 101. If you commit perjury in the state court, it has no effect on the

federal court. You have to commit that perjury in the federal court. Is the distinction I'm making

Before you get too far, I might just, some of that that is about perjury and some of it might also

testimony from the state court into the federal court, now they've committed perjury in the

the perjury himself and using false documents and all that kind of stuff.

perjury that she has checked the book going and everything is true and correct. So I cut

perjury and you're asking them to do that sui sponte. You're giving them as evidence and asking

somebody calling that perjury if it's a material fact that you're raising, which hopefully that's

your whole affidavit shot, your credibility shot, and you might even get perjury charges.

and and you you commit if you commit perjury pursuant to total 18 152 157 and 35 71

has to send a proof of service under penalty of perjury or any other document under penalty

of perjury uh if they're not the electronic filer they have to have a signed document

Is there a statute of limitations for filing a perjury charge against someone who lives

Is there a statute of limitations for filing a perjury charge against someone who pergers

Oh, so perjury is six years?

And now he has to take all this stuff up to the Supreme Court and let them make their decisions. But the amount of evidence that is pouring in and all the people that are giving sworn after David under penalty of perjury are by the hundreds now.

the penalty perjury and no answer and then if he didn't answer and that's when i got the

And it always has been. If perjury cannot reach the accuser, there is no accusation. Otherwise, anyone may accuse another falsely without risk. And they do it all the time.

Then that's material. That should get aggravated perjury charges against them.

It goes to aggravated perjury because he lied about something material in writing, and it was material to a case.

that people don't know that when you sign them, you're actually committing perjury if

Perjury is lying about a material fact.

It's only perjury if you lie about something that matters to the case.

perjury tampering with a governmental record tampering with physical evidence and then a

perjury tampering with a governmental record and tampering with physical evidence in order to

The allegation, an act of aggravated perjury and malicious prosecution.

to file a yearly Form 700, that's your document, your filing under penalty of perjury and you're

You make a claim against him for aggravated perjury and tampering with the government document.

And then he has to show that he didn't obstruct justice or tamper with a government document or aggravated perjury and or aggravated perjury.

Under penalty perjury that I know the statement is true

fabricating evidence okay i could also be aggravated perjury county assessor

of perjury that the balance is X, in this case, zero, and they have 14 days from

In effect, it says that the lawyers can lie, which we already know they do. They can commit perjury in writing and communications to the other side and to the court.

So, it's telling them that they can commit perjury in life. And it's really, you know, it's in a few states.

No, it said all of them is what the plaintiff claimed. So you could say that's aggravated perjury if you want.

Yeah, it's full of lives and that would come out and then they could be charged with aggravated perjury or whatever.

Well, that's perjury anyway, right?

Well, if they do it on the stand under oath, it's perjury or aggravated perjury.

If it's, I'm sorry, aggravated perjury is under oath.

Perjury is when it's not under oath.

Because perjury is not limited strictly to open court.

Perjury can also exist in an official document that they sign that makes false statements.

But usually the perjury is waived because it's a lesser offense than actually falsifying a government record or making false statements in an official record.

Okay, so I'm trying to get a clear definition of perjury and I just looked it up online and I wish my computer could cooperate here.

Correct. You can commit perjury by signing your name on a document you know to be false while swearing that everything in it is true.

It's the same thing with a contract. You can commit perjury on a contract if it has to be done under oath.

But what I was telling you is that if that document is an official document, perjury will be supplanted by the much more egregious offenses I told you of before.

Perjury was, you know, I'm a layman, I'm pretty green at this. So perjury was the first one I came up with, but what you just said would actually prompt me to dig a little deeper in some laws with that wordage there.

Yeah, your perjury, perjury will be let go to cover a much larger crime if it exists.

Okay, because they're not going to charge them with perjury if the elements of perjury in that instance would be identical to the elements of falsifying an official document under oath.

Yeah. Perjury gets superseded as a misdemeanor or an arrestable or jailable misdemeanor for a felony conviction on tampering with a government document.

The perjury and the perjury of his clients and all these false declarations is just so far off

of perjury that the facts that's stating in here in this document are true and accurate

They still have to have underpity of perjury on it, but they don't.

Yet the prosecutor is subordinating perjury by getting them up there to testify to these facts as if they are 100% true and admissible in that form

Well, they did all this perjury and now, well, next time they know how to live better to not be caught

He had that aggravated perjury too because he made an assertion that is false

I said that the officer that arrested me for failure to identify committed perjury and aggravated perjury.

Perjury is not in scope.

So yeah, that's what he yeah, aggravated perjury is not part of his job.

But but aggravated perjury is a crime.

Yeah, it would have to be an affidavit signed under penalty of perjury and it would have to be

who lied uh under oath committed uh aggravated perjury by line on on the line on a paper that

would go before the court uh aggravated perjury he said that was under uh the texas tort claims

his lie that's not perjury okay I once had I once had a guy in court uh that uh was a constable

so you definitely should go for him for aggravated perjury well again I think my statute of

committed aggravated perjury because he did that as a civilian or as a citizen not as a

when it contains a proper under penalty of perjury jurret and it's signed in front of

jurret i hear about sworn a penalty of perjury the foregoing facts are true and correct and

perjury generally, and statements or injuries generally

She committed perjury in her filings,

Did you file aggravated perjury charges against him with the trial judge?

You need to come back after them for aggravated perjury and tamper them with a government document

For aggravated perjury first

Someone who is doing it under penalty of perjury from firsthand knowledge, and they're not.

under penalty of perjury from first hand knowledge, and they're not.

Aggravated perjury fits better than anything else.

If someone commits perjury and before you act on the perjure statements, they recant their perjure statements

You commit aggravated perjury on the stand, it's criminal, even if it's a civil case

Okay, she committed perjury on her bankruptcy papers

It would be perjury, but it wouldn't be aggravated perjury because it's not material

But not prosecute you for aggravated perjury because you really did not create any harm

So instead of trying to accuse them of perjury and ask for sanctions

yourself under penalty of perjury you need to get the other party to say it so

So you can do it under oath or you can do a notarized affidavit indicating that these are true and that if you're lying, you're subject to perjury and therefore the consequences of perjury.

Then you need to charge him with aggravated perjury and have him with a government document.

These guys, you can charge them with aggravated perjury and tampering the government document,

I came to find out that he committed perjury and an affidavit after, you know, going through the docket and reading it more.

Now, he won't even talk to me. Nothing. I am just cranking. I sent him an email saying that, you know, I came with notice of his perjury and I'm going to file a criminal complaint with my local special agent in charge, FBI.

I didn't want to get on the judge's bad side or whatever, but I also have a motion. I stole this from, I plagiarized it from Alphonse in the chat, a motion for curative instructions as it pertains to citizens arrest for the perjury on this attorney.

That didn't even call them a sworn, it's not sworn under, you know, the penalty of perjury or anything like that.

that actually has a swear under penalty of perjury thing.

He just committed perjury on the witness stand.

conspiracy, perjury of oath, interference with my constitutional rights, both state and federal, intentional infliction of emotional distress,

I've got her committing perjury on the record, but don't you worry, she's the Utah Bar Attorney

Yes, for committing aggravated perjury to your detriment.

It's only perjury if it is a material fact.

but you guys brought up perjury tonight.

perjury but aggravated perjury yeah

In the Fed, aggravated perjury is aggravated perjury even if a lawyer does it.

Make up an aggravated perjury charge against the lawyer and put it in an envelope and address

I also not only named the lawyer that's been forced on me in this federal civil rights lawsuit but a couple weeks ago I mentioned and I filed a small claim lawsuit naming him and the United States and the claim is perjury of oath

It doesn't say I'm a person with competent firsthand knowledge of the facts presented herein, and I hereby testify under penalty of perjury that all these facts are true and correct to the best of my ability.

in order to make an actual sworn complaint that can be done under penalty of perjury because the facts in it are based upon personal knowledge discovered by the officers in the investigation.

These are two very different legal standards. Actually swearing to allege facts made under penalty of perjury in an official document requires the affidavit to have firsthand personal knowledge of the veracity of those facts.

The entire reason any particular document must be sworn to under penalty of perjury is to ensure that the person doing the swearing personally knows that the facts alleged in the document are actually true rather than being mere personal belief.

Okay? Relative to criminal prosecutions, an actual affidavit is intended to dissuade persons from making false allegations or alleging the veracity of specific facts for which they have no personal knowledge by ensuring punitive consequences in the form of charges for perjury or aggravated perjury,

perjury charges for falsifying the government documents, it'll give them reason to conduct

He he just committed what's called aggravated perjury. Yeah. Perjury is when he says Bina is so ugly.

I really want to pursue perjury with at least one of them.

The way I read that, that is aggravated perjury on one hand and tampering with the government

He committed aggravated perjury and official oppression.

I've got 15 counts of aggravated perjury in this lawsuit. And all of them, nothing is about the traffic ticket.

It's all about his aggravated perjury that deprived me of my due process rights.

I sued him in small claims court and for perjury of oath,

File aggravated perjury charges against them.

with 15 counts of aggravated perjury that denied me in my federally protected right

perjury is objectively unreasonable.

aggravated perjury, false statements of material fact, his aggravated perjury is depriving

fibs or something but no they're straight up huge big lies act rated perjury these are false

So I said that this guy's aggravated perjury deprived me of due process

I reported Medicaid fraud and the CPS worker committing aggravated perjury against me

The Medicaid fraud and the aggravated perjury caught the attention of the OIG and then

by showing that the witness committed perjury on the stand,

They're requiring you to fill out government paperwork that you are not required to fill out and thus are committing perjury by doing it.

a tax you have sworn on an affidavit form under penalty of perjury that you actually

with aggravated perjury for making a false statement under oath.

In other words, the prosecutor is subordinate perjury from a witness who is unqualified

He, he stacked up so much aggravated perjury that it just got under my skin and I said,

Yeah, cause she was, she was going to have to commit perjury on the stand and they were

going to be suborning perjury by putting her up there.

The person who wrote his sworn, what is it, penalty under perjury of law statement described

If it does not have a penalty of perjury affirmation on it, it is not a sworn document, according

knowledge and personal knowledge must have a penalty of perjury juror.

There is no threat of perjury for making a false statement in a criminal complaint either in Chapter 15 or in Chapter 45.

because it stated on penalty of perjury that they said they knew the facts to be true under penalty of perjury.

Because to be sworn, that complaint would have to have the under penalty of perjury jurat language.

Therefore, the statement I was making to that cop had a under penalty of perjury jurat on it or I could not have signed it.

Why? Because an affidavit in Texas must have a penalty of perjury jurat on it, or it's not an affidavit.

with aggravated perjury and ask the judge to interview the child

word for word, this is what aggravated perjury is. If somebody does this and this and this.

lawyer for aggravated perjury and let them bring that daughter in and prove up their

aggravated perjury or some definable tort that's outside the scope of the prosecution

And if he swore to it under oath and it was a material fact, well that's aggravated perjury in every state.

and he did all that aggravated perjury and caused me all this trouble.

However, if they commit aggravated perjury before the court, you can pursue criminal

And not just perjury, perjury is just lying.

It's only perjury when you lie about a material fact.

But you don't get to commit perjury on them either, so in that case, you can go after

you cannot be unless you commit aggravated perjury as long as you tell the truth

and that rule and sanction the attorneys for their perjury because of their impossibly

Well, the thing is, is what I did was I served him, I served the judge with a criminal complaint for aggravated perjury for the state creeper.

to is not going to fall apart in court and you get accused of perjury or something.

No way they can join those two. If you're claiming perjury in one and petitioning for

chance they'll join them. Okay, because the state one is a tort claim based on perjury and collusion