Rule of Law Radio Archive Search Engine

I let him go explain it to a grand jury of my peers,

I'd rather file an appeal with the grand jury of my peers.

He would be embarrassed from getting this story about one of his troops from one of the major's peers.

Well, and also, you have to remember, the grand jury is your, they are your peers, and

Instead of appealing to a jury of their peers, I'll appeal to a jury of my peers

Well, I not only made more narcotics arrests than my peers, I also worked on the DWI task

but to have to look at the specter of explaining themselves to a grand jury of my peers, not their peers.

The bandwagon is a fallacy in which a threat of rejection by one's peers is

Person P is presented by his or her peers, is pressured by his or her peers

I went to Vietnam rather than suffer the rejection of my peers or my

perceived peers.

It was easier to go than risk the rejection of my peers.

This is what you think while you're standing in front of the court. Before you open your mouth, always think, how will this look before a grand jury of my peers?

before a grand jury of my peers? What will make me look good and them look bad?

will look good in front of a grand jury of my peers and that will do more to protect you than anything else.

I'm looking around me and I'm finding that they're my peers and closest friends now.

Now he's one of my best friends and peers.

and it's just amazing now, you know, these people are like my best friends and peers.

to a grand jury, my peers, not their peers.

They're not our peers.

and without a jury of our peers saying so.

I demanded a jury of my peers to make this ruling, okay?

to get along or is afraid of being ridiculed or cast out by his peers for being afraid.

punished by your peers and superiors. By acquiescing so as to avoid such things, you make yourselves

extent, even if it was just in private with their peers or their peers probably wouldn't

care, their peers would probably be happy about it.

No, you're guaranteed a fair trial before a jury of your peers, not necessarily impartial.

a jury of his peers.

They're not a jury of your peers because they have no knowledge of the law dealing with

without any intervention by a jury of your peers, okay?

the top, be the ones standing before a court of our, a jury of our peers.

And I want to know what you're doing out here amongst my peers with loaded pistols on your hips

by the state without the state having to go through that individual's peers to determine

They deprive you of a right to a jury of your peers because if I was getting a jury of my peers,

However, you just never know what a grand jury of my peers is going to do.

of the United States is nonsense. Do you? Well, we'll see what a grand jury of my peers

without the jury of the peers determining there's a reason to have a case.

peers.

We insisted that a grand jury of our peers are the ones that decide whether or not someone's prosecuted

that an ordinary jury of our peers, not your peers, your industry insider,

Yeah it was but it also protects us from intrusion upon our rights by others of our peers not just government

Just always keep in mind what will play well before a grand jury of your peers

times faster than their peers whose names begin with A through I. Carlson theorizes

times faster than their peers whose names begin with A through I.

jury trial, my peers won't necessarily be too affected by me. I'm looking at a very small amount

term straw man or our peers the corporate veil and who is the real who is this fictional

of your peers and not their peers, that will have a very strong effect on their behavior.

How will what I'm about to do play before a grand jury of his peers?

You appeal to a grand jury of your peers.

When that agent looks and has an answer to a grand jury of our peers, not his peers,

Later, the SpongeBob kids scored 12 points lower on mental function tests than their peers.

kids scored 12 points lower on mental function tests than their peers and when they measured

I'm going to appeal to a grand jury of my peers and see what they think about that crapola. See what they think about these judges shielding this other judge from prosecution when he's committing all these outrageous crimes.

from his police academy, he was promoted above his peers, and he was known for his meticulous

Appeal it to a grand jury of your peers, not that chomp's peers

The one thing to keep foremost in your mind at all times is what would a grand jury of my peers

Bar association. How would a grand jury of my peers respond to this? And when you write it,

you write it for a grand jury of your peers. So every statute that you reference, you need to

there is no separation of powers, no independent jury by peers or by the people. Therefore

And I would much rather appeal their behavior to a grand jury of my peers.

Then I went to a court of his peers.

Instead of appealing to the court of appeals, appeal to a grand jury of your peers and see

and you appeal to a grand jury of your peers to indict the judge for denying you in your right to a fair jurist in the first instance.

Every public official in the country would have to look at the prospect of explaining his behavior to a grand jury of my peers and not his peers.

And instead of, and so I'm ready, you know, to pick my peers and I'm ready to, you know,

and actually get found not guilty by a jury of your peers, so never give up.

Who is more protected by their underlings, peers and overseers as both current and former

What is the grand jury of his peers going to think about what I'm about to do?

Fail to do that, we should go down and appeal to a grand jury of our peers, not to a court of their peers.

But if we can't, then we put the Attorney General in a position to where he has to consider what is the grand jury of his peers going to think about this stuff as opposed to my peers.

And when that judge looks at a jury of your peers,

examining what he does instead of a jury of his peers, that'll change everything. Hang on.

grand jury of your peers that would make sense to them. I can tell you, I just went through the

And I would much rather appeal to a grand jury of my peers to indict Judge McBride

But we as the sovereigns, our appeals should be to grand juries of our peers, not their peers.

When a public official has to look at the prospect of explaining his behavior to a grand jury of my peers, not his peers.

You know, we'll see what a grand jury of my peers has to think about that.

If we start getting this funny mouth judge having to explain his behavior to a grand jury of our peers, not his peers, we'll change their behavior quickly.

We have a right to be judged by our peers.

Now let him explain to a grand jury of my peers why he was threatening me.

worse than their peers.

with higher blood levels of code need a breakdown product of nicotine scored worse than their peers

scored worse than their peers.

And see what a grand jury of your peers, not the judge's peers, thinks of that nonsense.

And if he has to think what would a grand jury of his peers think about what I'm about

your peers rather than to a corrupt appellate court.

which we really believe that a jury of our peers would have understood.

will protect me. But the problem is, is that's the grand jury of your peers, not their peers.

your peers? Is it catching on? Does it seem to be growing that the students are like,

They're going to worry that we may actually get before a grand jury of our peers, not their peers.

You call that assault, they're going to say it's not and you tell them, well, we'll see what a grand jury of my peers thinks about that.

Not some police panel of your peers.

That's a grand jury of our peers has stated that there is sufficient evidence to believe a crime has been committed and that this person committed it.

And let him explain his decision to a grand jury of your peers or to a pettit jury or to the bar association, get him explaining his position.

I'm always thinking what would look good before a grand jury of my peers or toward a pedicure of my peers.

to have the facts of the charge heard by a jury of my peers in the first instance of

to be presumed innocent and proven guilty in a court of law by a jury of my peers. E,

right to not be punished unless and until I am actually convicted by a jury of my peers

But if you had a jury of your peers that refused to convict you because they knew it was the

with peers as they're growing up. That's not true, okay? That is not true at all. You get

but with a grand jury of our peers, not their peers.

A person generally considered by his peers to conduct himself in such a manner as displays a callous disregard for the feelings of other human beings and thus deserving of being shunned and ostracized.

Will jump at opportunities three times faster than their peers whose names begin with A through I

How would this play before a grand jury of my peers?

jury of our peers.

that's malpractice. Okay. Send him a tort letter and tell him we'll see what a jury of my peers

my peers.

Well, the officer thought I was just jerking him around. Well, I wasn't. I'm always thinking what will play well before a grand jury of my peers?

Always think what will play well in front of a jury of my peers.

You go to a grand jury of my peers and see what they think of a judge denying me in a public court

And we've demanded for trial by judgment of our peers.

where did a grand jury of my peers come up with the idea that they could do something that on its face

When you explain that to a grand jury, your peers will see what they think

And we've demanded for trial by judgment of our peers.

They tend to be grand jurors of your peers, and they tend to take a different view of that kind of thing.

Later, the Spongebob kids scored 12 points lower on mental function tests than their peers.

We'll see how this flies in front of a grand jury of our peers.

and we want them to go explain their behavior through a grand jury of my peers,

not their peers, of why you're doing things that is not in compliance with the written code.

to file an appeal. I'm going to appeal it to our grand jury of my peers and see what

are not assessed by a jury of your peers.

jury of my peers, not their peers, was going to end their career tomorrow.

see what a grand jury of my peers thinks of a district judge who gets all the people under

than their peers.

Because I figured my peers would understand, hey...

The kids with higher blood levels of cotinine, a breakdown product of nicotine, scored worse than their peers.

how would this play before a grand jury of my peers? And by that calculation, the less

the prosecutors and the judges, they don't want a grand jury of our peers mucking around

If he has to contemplate the consideration of grand jury of my peers is likely to make

let's see, how would what I'm about to do play before a grand jury of his peers, not

my peers?

What would a grand jury of his peers think about what I'm about to do to him?

of what is going to play well in front of a grand jury of my peers.

jury of my peers.

So let him explain his behavior to a grand jury of your peers

To a grand jury of your peers, not their peers

So let's see how his petulance plays in front of a grand jury of my peers, not his peers.

accusation except by the presentment of an indictment by a grand jury of his peers,

toward the police over time, a grand jury of our peers will not be likewise affected.

yeah so we need to present those to a grand jury of our peers

So what you do is, if you always think, what will play well before a grand jury of my peers?

peers at the grand jury level or a proper charging instrument, which are the only two

If he has to consider the likelihood of explaining his behavior to a grand jury of my peers,

not his peers, that is very likely to curb his personal passions and invoke his professionalism.

reaction by the temperament of a grand jury of my peers.

Just for kicks and giggles, a jury of your peers found you guilty of whatever was driving

And let him explain his authority to a grand jury of my peers.

is far, far less than the fallout from a presentation of her behavior to a grand jury of your peers

to explain his behavior to a grand jury of my peers of your peers not a grand jury of his peers

and right now police policemen for the most part have to answer to their own peers because they

Will jump at opportunities three times faster than their peers whose names begin with A through I

Let him explain that crap to a grand jury of our peers, not his peers.

How is that going to look before a grand jury of our peers?

The only way you could be prosecuted is by a proclamation of a grand jury of your peers.

Later the Spongebob kids scored 12 points lower on mental function tests than their peers

Later, the SpongeBob kids scored 12 points lower on mental function tests than their peers.

Because I'm always thinking what will play well in front of the grand jury of my peers

to deal with a group of our peers. I can't imagine how this is going to improve anyone's

The kids with higher blood levels of cotinine, a breakdown product of nicotine, scored worse than their peers.

Ohio researchers studied more than 4,000 children aged 6 to 16 and gave them math, reading, and memory tests. The kids with higher blood levels of cotinine, a breakdown product of nicotine, scored worse than their peers. In fact, those kids' IQs were 2 to 5 points lower.

The grand jury, my peers, is it okay for lawyers to lie to the court?

you're crafting your behavior based on what will play well before a grand jury of my peers

But that Addison judge finds out that he's going to he's likely to have to explain to a grand jury of your peers,

if he has to look at explaining himself to a grand jury of my peers, he will be self-regulating.

You're writing to a grand jury of your peers

The grand jury are my peers, actually not my peers.

A grand jury are the peers of the guy across the street who doesn't necessarily know anything

How will what I'm about to say play in front of a grand jury of my peers?

he may have to consider what is a grand jury of my peers, not his peers, likely to think

I'm always thinking what will play well in front of a grand jury of my peers

It's so technical. I want to hurt a few of them so that they complain to their peers about what was done to them

and maybe wake a few of the peers up.

Yeah, Grand Jury would be an excellent place, because Grand Jury are your peers.

you think how would a jury of my peers respond to this?

You know, I know that I'm entitled to a jury of 12 of my peers.

citizen's peers think about what they're about to do.

will jump at opportunities three times faster than their peers whose names begin with A through I.

times faster than their peers whose names begin with A through I.

and see what a grand jury of our peers think about a judge capriciously

What is a grand jury of my peers likely to think

Okay, because I was taught to talk to the peers because I had that incident with them,

peers, not necessarily learned counsel, but just ordinary people. What made this

And I'd much rather appeal to a grand jury of my peers instead of a whole panel of corrupt

If he has to consider what is a grand jury of his peers likely to think about what I'm

What is a grand jury of his peers likely to think about what I'm about to do?

What is a grand jury of his peers likely to think about what I'm about to do?

and start appealing to grand juries of our peers.

Because I'm always thinking, what's going to play well in front of the grand jury of my peers?

of your peers and my peers, his behavior, and not to a appeals court of his peers.

If it's clear, well, think of it in terms of a grand jury, the grand jury of your peers

and my peers.

grand jury of my peers. Not their peers, but your peers.

take this to a grand jury of your peers. Now, I have a whole routine for how to do...

No, I want what he does reconsidered by a grand jury of my peers.

Well, so if I do a jury of my peers, do they have to be the same religion, same...

peers, not their peers. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. Well, I say we're

But what I'm really doing is I'm always thinking what will play well before a grand jury of my peers.

And take every dime from them you can, but you need a purpose that a jury of your peers can look at it and say, that's a credible purpose.

times faster than their peers whose names begin with A through I.

and always do this in terms of what would a grand jury of my peers think about what I am presenting?

And everybody's involved in this, thinking in terms of a grand jury of your peers, not their peers.

Ken said, did you say that to him? I always say that to them, because I'm always thinking what will look good before a grand jury of my peers? When the cop accuses me of being agitated?

asking for and a jury of your peers will be asked to make that determination how's that

also appeal to a grand jury of our peers and see how that works for the judge

Well, I want to go to a grand jury of my peers and there's nothing to prevent you from doing that.

They're not going to feel the same way about a grand jury of your peers.

Your peers, not their peers.

Let's see how comfortable he is having his cases appeal to a grand jury of your peers

and not his peers.

of his peers to look at things and they don't want that. Am I correct?

Everything I do, I'm thinking, how will this play before a grand jury of my peers?

The judge has to consider what is the grand jury of your peers, not his peers,

I'm going to look for a way to stitch these pieces together for a jury of my peers.

Piers, different peers of crimes.

a grand jury of our peers.

Never say or do anything until you consider, how will this play before a grand jury of my peers?

We are going to have to work harder to educate our peers.

grand juries are grand juries of our peers, not their peers.

I'm always thinking, what will play well before a grand jury of my peers?

one year in jail. I'm entitled to a jury of my peers, which is sick to a misdemeanor

that they have peers as though they've thrown him under the bus and from arrogance and the

So let him explain that to a grand jury of your peers.

how will a grand jury of my peers respond to what I'm about to do or about to say?

my peers?

Not before a judge, not before a prosecutor, but a grand jury of my peers that changes

I'm sure when you explain this to a grand jury of my peers, they're going to be real understanding.

of my peers?

Always I'm thinking, what will play well before a grand jury of my peers?

play well before a grand jury of my peers.

So how's it going to look when you get in front of a jury of your peers.

I'm always thinking, what is it, what will a jury of my peers think about this behavior?

That's what she told me. I'd like to see her try to explain that to a judge or a grand jury of your peers.

Let a grand jury of our peers decide what they think.

And get a grand jury of our peers to see if they agree with us that you failed to perform a duty you were required to perform it in the process, denied us in the full and free access to enjoyment.

Judges think they're absolutely immune, but when you start putting judges in front of grand juries of our peers, we're going to start getting their attention.

A jury of your peers, not their peers. Who do you get to a jury? We kind of get to one in

So you're going to be, this goes before a jury, jury of your peers, not their peers.

Okay. Say, I want to get this in front of a grand jury of my peers. They make you be more than

and you're going to be bringing lawyers to a jury of your peers.

We'll see what a jury of our peers thinks about this kind of improper behavior.

to peers.

The grand jury is a grand jury of your peers, not their peers.

Everything you do, you should think, what will play well before a grand jury of my peers? How do you put together a story that the grand jury will buy?

And by that one on Bubba, I'm sure when you explain your reason to a grand jury of my peers, they'll be real understanding.

peers. Call me agitated. See how that works for you. Hang on, we're about to go to break.

demanding a trial by jury judgment by peers.

he needs to explain that to a grand jury of my peers, not his peers, and not some bought and paid for federal judge.

You know, maybe he can support his position. Well, let him give him an opportunity to support in front of grand jury, your peers.

Now he's looking at the possibility of having to explain it to a grand jury of your peers.

how is this going to look in front of a grand jury of my peers?

but juries, they're not necessarily my peers

One is you can't get a jury of your peers because they're a resident.

But back to the jury not being of your peers, can you object to that jury?

Your peers were not allowed to participate in your jury.

But you would have to challenge the statute forming a jury pool as being unconstitutional and thus incapable of giving you a fair and impartial trial with it by a jury of your peers.

the second judge to do. Always think what's going to look good in front of a jury of my peers.

But a jury of your peers, the first guy tries to shield the municipal officers from prosecution.

about to say play before a grand jury of my peers. I'm setting this guy up so I

you talk about how are things going to look before a jury of your peers,

Because they're jurors of our peers, and sometimes a guy gets lucky and gets one of the peers who's willing to stand up to the system if he believes the system is malfunctioning.

by never having a jury of your peers. You don't have a jury of people who know what you know

how will this sound to a grand jury of my peers. So when the officer tells the grand jury

jury of my peers think about what I'm about to say or do.

And you can say that a jury of our peers determined in this particular case that a citizen's time was worth this much.

You know, let them explain that to a jury of your peers.

and completely ignorant of any and all criminal conduct by his peers on any given day

jury of your peers. You will get a jury hand picked for their absolute total ignorance

scenario and imagine how it plays out before a jury of your peers and and

And I can bet you the last thing this lawyer is going to want to happen is to have this letter in front of a grand jury of your peers

of my peers respond to what I'm doing, what I'm writing, or the arguments that I'm making,

If he won't explain it to you, maybe he'll explain it to a grand jury of your peers.

If he has to consider the calculation of what will a grand jury of his peers think about what I'm about to do,

rule on your judge, or you can go to the grand jury of your peers and ask the grand jury

so we can go to a grand jury of our peers.

Now these are two cops who were made Officer or Trooper of the Year by their peers who were convicted of these kinds of crimes.

They left that discretion to a grand jury of our peers, not their peers.

Let him, I'm sure, Mr. Officer, when you explain yourself to a grand jury of my peers, they'll be real understanding about why you decided to ignore what 14.03, 1406 absolutely commanded you to do.

of Appeals. Yeah, we can. We can also appeal your ruling to a grand jury of our peers and

that judge's peers. I would rather appeal to a grand jury. And that's what I was just

So I took that to heart and I write everything I do for a grand jury of my peers.

always thinking what will play well before a grand jury of my peers. They can't accuse me of being

in order to not deny me in a riot. Explain that to a grand jury of your peers. And speaking

what will play well before a grand jury of my peers? When I'm standing in the courtroom

jury of my peers? Debater says, why can't you arrest the judge? You can. Just throw

how will this play before a grand jury or a jury of my peers?

a jury of my peers?

that communicates to think about a jury of your peers or even better yet. Think about a jury of

He's going to give it to a grand jury of 12, not of your peers, but of all the citizens' peers.

jury of our peers, let them refute your behavior and see what they think of it.

We get to step right around everybody and take our complaint to a jury of our peers.

to explain himself to a grand jury of my peers, not his peers.

Everything you say in court, before you open your mouth, think what will play well before a grand jury of my peers.

Always, what will play well before a grand jury of my peers?

that one of their peers has violated a code.

what's going to look good before a grand jury of my peers?

is how is that going to play before a grand jury of my peers?

Having a jury trial or a bench trial. And I think honestly it depends on what the case is and how you feel that the other people, like you're going to have a jury. Think about these jury of your peers.

Our founders, the idea of a grand jury was it was intended that a grand jury be made up of your peers,

You know, everything you do, consider how a jury of your peers would respond to it.

You know, lay this stuff out there so that a jury of your peers would look at that and get the picture

jury of your peers.

a jury of your peers.

of his own peers. He can't, um, he can't, well, no, wait a second. Him being able to serve as a

juror is irrelevant. Well, I know, but he, but he wouldn't be able to have a jury of his own peers.

Wait a minute. She made it. She made a good point there. He can't have a jury of his peers.

How do you think that's going to look to a jury of her peers?

You embarrass him in front of his peers. He may want to give you the ruling you want,

but he's not going to allow himself to be embarrassed in front of his peers.

of people from the common people, your peers. And that turned into a jury of our peers.

peers, which is in each of the states that have them, and definitely in the Fed, a fourth branch

The people are checking into this, the jury of your peers

These are his peers not ours

explaining themselves to a grand jury of your peers not their peers