[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.500 --> 00:09.500] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.500 --> 00:11.000] Our liberty depends on it. [00:11.000 --> 00:16.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights. [00:16.500 --> 00:18.500] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.500 --> 00:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.000 --> 00:26.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:26.500 --> 00:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.000 --> 00:34.500] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:34.500 --> 00:38.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [00:38.000 --> 00:42.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.000 --> 00:45.500] Start over with Startpage. [00:45.500 --> 00:47.500] Spar, it's what fighters do. [00:47.500 --> 00:51.000] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:51.000 --> 00:54.000] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:54.000 --> 00:56.500] Spar with an extra P. [00:56.500 --> 01:03.000] S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion. [01:03.000 --> 01:08.500] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion. [01:08.500 --> 01:10.500] But petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.500 --> 01:14.500] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.500 --> 01:17.500] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, [01:17.500 --> 01:21.000] we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:21.000 --> 01:26.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.000 --> 01:34.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:34.500 --> 01:38.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:38.000 --> 01:39.500] Our liberty depends on it. [01:39.500 --> 01:43.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way [01:43.000 --> 01:46.000] to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:46.000 --> 01:48.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:48.000 --> 01:51.500] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:51.500 --> 01:56.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [01:56.500 --> 01:58.000] So protect your rights. [01:58.000 --> 02:01.500] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.500 --> 02:04.000] Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. [02:04.000 --> 02:08.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [02:08.000 --> 02:12.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.000 --> 02:15.000] Start over with StartPage. [02:15.000 --> 02:19.000] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms [02:19.000 --> 02:22.000] around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:22.000 --> 02:26.000] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, [02:26.000 --> 02:30.000] arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:30.000 --> 02:33.000] Get it? Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? [02:33.000 --> 02:38.000] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captioned the spirit of the Second Amendment so well when he said, [02:38.000 --> 02:43.000] The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, [02:43.000 --> 02:47.000] one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, [02:47.000 --> 02:51.000] but which historically has proved to always be possible. [02:51.000 --> 03:14.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:21.000 --> 03:27.000] Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do? [03:27.000 --> 03:30.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:30.000 --> 03:33.000] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:33.000 --> 03:36.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:36.000 --> 03:38.000] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:38.000 --> 03:41.000] When you were eight and you had bad traits, [03:41.000 --> 03:44.000] you'd go to school and learn the golden rule. [03:44.000 --> 03:47.000] So why are you acting like a bloody fool? [03:47.000 --> 03:49.000] If you get hot, then you must get cool. [03:49.000 --> 03:52.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:52.000 --> 03:54.000] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:54.000 --> 03:57.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:57.000 --> 04:00.000] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [04:00.000 --> 04:03.000] You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one, [04:03.000 --> 04:06.000] you chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father, [04:06.000 --> 04:09.000] you chuck it on your brother and you chuck it on your sister, [04:09.000 --> 04:11.000] you chuck it on that one and you chuck it on me. [04:11.000 --> 04:14.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [04:14.000 --> 04:17.000] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [04:17.000 --> 04:33.120] Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do? What you gonna do when they come for you? [05:03.120 --> 05:09.280] And we're a little late coming on because, you know, I'm old and in my dotage, and Brett [05:09.280 --> 05:15.280] has to school me on the date and time, and he didn't tell me what day it was today, so [05:15.280 --> 05:17.280] it left me confused. [05:17.280 --> 05:21.280] Us poor old people, you shouldn't be mean to us. [05:21.280 --> 05:23.600] Well, I didn't tell you the year. [05:23.600 --> 05:26.600] I think you can figure it out. [05:26.600 --> 05:29.600] Randy, are you there? [05:29.600 --> 05:30.600] Oh, no. [05:30.600 --> 05:35.800] Don't tell me your mic is... [05:35.800 --> 05:40.280] Can you wiggle something there and get your audio going again? [05:40.280 --> 05:43.160] Hello, Randy. [05:43.160 --> 05:46.440] Well, this is the Rue La La Radio. [05:46.440 --> 05:51.560] This is the 12th of January, 2023, and Randy Kelton is... [05:51.560 --> 05:53.040] Am I back? [05:53.040 --> 05:54.240] ...adjusting his mic. [05:54.240 --> 05:57.240] Hey, there he is. [05:57.240 --> 05:58.240] All right. [05:58.240 --> 05:59.240] Okay. [05:59.240 --> 06:02.520] Well, I couldn't get that right anyway, so Brett had to do it for me. [06:02.520 --> 06:08.520] You were going to talk about how your traffic ticket has blown up into a federal case. [06:08.520 --> 06:10.520] Oh, my goodness. [06:10.520 --> 06:17.040] Well, you know, I really thought that I was being left alone for years. [06:17.040 --> 06:18.040] They were finally... [06:18.040 --> 06:22.120] You know, I got to the point where I beat everybody up bad enough that I was being left [06:22.120 --> 06:23.120] alone, right? [06:23.120 --> 06:29.560] And I borrowed my wife's car and got a speeding ticket, as a... [06:29.560 --> 06:31.240] Well, it turned out... [06:31.240 --> 06:36.120] The way that it started out looked to me like it's going to be a perfect teaching opportunity [06:36.120 --> 06:41.400] because it doesn't have a lot of extra stuff going on. [06:41.400 --> 06:42.480] It's very focused. [06:42.480 --> 06:48.520] It's a state trooper, so there's no other issues about does the officer have the authority [06:48.520 --> 06:52.760] to enforce this code because he's the guy. [06:52.760 --> 07:00.760] And it wasn't anything like, pulled me over for one thing and then did some illegal searching [07:00.760 --> 07:02.120] and came up with something else. [07:02.120 --> 07:07.600] It was just this very simple speeding, and they blew it. [07:07.600 --> 07:09.320] Randy, they ruined everything. [07:09.320 --> 07:11.400] It could have been so simple. [07:11.400 --> 07:12.400] They just... [07:12.400 --> 07:14.760] At every turn, they do so many things wrong. [07:14.760 --> 07:19.800] They can't seem to get any of it right. [07:19.800 --> 07:23.080] So they put a couple of guys... [07:23.080 --> 07:26.440] What started out as one guy who... [07:26.440 --> 07:35.280] He's acting as the prosecutor, but unfortunately, he's not authorized to be the prosecutor. [07:35.280 --> 07:42.040] He is authorized to do some kind of juvenile mental health something or other because they [07:42.040 --> 07:52.440] gave him the title of special prosecutor, which is defined in our statutes, but it has [07:52.440 --> 07:57.560] nothing to do with what they're trying to use him for. [07:57.560 --> 08:07.960] He could do some little part-time juvie mental health stuff, but he can't do traffic tickets. [08:07.960 --> 08:14.600] So they're trying to use him for traffic tickets, but unfortunately, the Constitution and the [08:14.600 --> 08:18.200] Texas Code of Criminal Procedure don't agree with that idea. [08:18.200 --> 08:23.480] You can't just have anybody you feel like, any random tiling contractor and wallpaper [08:23.480 --> 08:29.320] dude come in and start handling things that we, the people, have very specifically through [08:29.320 --> 08:37.240] our legislators, given authority to do criminal prosecutions to a district attorney or a county [08:37.240 --> 08:42.120] attorney, and in a county where there's no county attorney, it can be the criminal district [08:42.120 --> 08:51.640] attorney, but it can't be just any random lawyer that happens to have a state bar card, [08:51.640 --> 08:55.720] and that's what they're using, that's what they're doing. [08:55.720 --> 09:03.760] Well, one thing after another, I've been holding them accountable to as many things as I can [09:03.760 --> 09:07.880] keep up with, and they've been very prolific about that. [09:07.880 --> 09:09.600] You know how that goes, Randy. [09:09.600 --> 09:11.640] They give you plenty of opportunity. [09:11.640 --> 09:21.560] Well, so what started out as a speeding ticket back in August, and now here we are, all these [09:21.560 --> 09:29.640] months later, I went to six court appearances, and they couldn't get anything right. [09:29.640 --> 09:31.560] It just got worse and worse for them. [09:31.560 --> 09:38.000] One of the judges disqualified, two judges actually, the first judge said she wasn't [09:38.000 --> 09:42.320] going to disqualify, but then she recused herself. [09:42.320 --> 09:48.000] Second judge, I disqualified him, and he's the one that denied my, famously denied my [09:48.000 --> 09:53.040] motion for due process, denied. [09:53.040 --> 10:00.320] Well, I guess you can't fault him for that because he believed the prosecutor, this mental [10:00.320 --> 10:11.240] health juvie guy, the special prosecutor convinced the court that due process, he keeps insisting [10:11.240 --> 10:15.760] on due process, well, your honor, that's just ludicrous. [10:15.760 --> 10:23.640] No, it's not ludicrous, it's due process. [10:23.640 --> 10:35.360] He also says this wannabe prosecutor was insisting that jurisdiction is an issue that only comes [10:35.360 --> 10:42.800] into play for civil issues, whereas this case, this imaginary case that exists only in his [10:42.800 --> 10:47.280] head because he never filed a shred of paper in his life, or in this whole case, he hadn't [10:47.280 --> 10:49.760] filed anything. [10:49.760 --> 11:00.760] This case is criminal, and so he wants to say that a criminal case, you don't need to [11:00.760 --> 11:04.640] consider anything about jurisdiction, that doesn't apply, that would only be if it would [11:04.640 --> 11:05.640] be civil case. [11:05.640 --> 11:11.880] It just got sillier and sillier from there, and it just went, it just has ballooned way [11:11.880 --> 11:13.680] out of proportion. [11:13.680 --> 11:22.040] So now, at some point, before they actually had their sixth and final court appearance, [11:22.040 --> 11:29.480] I went ahead and just filed a federal lawsuit against this lawyer, and I filed against him [11:29.480 --> 11:37.480] not about anything in the case, or the only reason it sounds like it's related to the [11:37.480 --> 11:42.520] case is because that was the context when he did all this lying, but I'm charging him [11:42.520 --> 11:48.120] with 15 counts of aggravated perjury that denied me in my federally protected right [11:48.120 --> 11:52.280] to due process, so it's really simple and focused. [11:52.280 --> 11:58.920] It's not about right to travel, and it's not about, you know, is there commercial activity [11:58.920 --> 12:04.520] or not, all that stuff I brought up in the case itself about speeding ticket, but in [12:04.520 --> 12:07.120] the Fed, I'm not dealing with any of that. [12:07.120 --> 12:14.800] All this is, we have a guy over here who's lying, he says he's got some kind of case [12:14.800 --> 12:19.560] that he's, there's a controversy before the court, there's not, he's lying. [12:19.560 --> 12:24.600] He says he's authorized to prosecute, he's not, he's lying. [12:24.600 --> 12:31.480] He says that due process doesn't apply, he's lying, it does. [12:31.480 --> 12:37.640] He says that jurisdiction is not relevant, well, he's lying, it is relevant. [12:37.640 --> 12:42.200] All of these lies, I got 15 of them stacked up and said, he's depriving me of my due [12:42.200 --> 12:50.640] process rights, my federal constitution protects my right to due process, and his aggravated [12:50.640 --> 12:53.360] perjury is objectively unreasonable. [12:53.360 --> 13:01.040] You can't call that, well, he, you know, he was just doing his job, no, that's crimes. [13:01.040 --> 13:13.680] So right now that is before the federal district court and it's kind of comical to see even [13:13.680 --> 13:16.720] what's happening there. [13:16.720 --> 13:19.600] What has happened in the Fed court so far? [13:19.600 --> 13:25.560] Well, so before that, my complaint was the 4th of November. [13:25.560 --> 13:32.160] So they were all served the following Monday, that's the 7th. [13:32.160 --> 13:35.320] So 21 days later is the 28th of November. [13:35.320 --> 13:37.560] You would think it would all be over right then, right? [13:37.560 --> 13:46.120] On the 29th, I filed a motion for default judgment and they sat on it for a little bit [13:46.120 --> 13:51.560] and a lawyer stepped up and started filing things. [13:51.560 --> 13:58.360] There was no appearance of counsel, not for another five days, but I guess they finally [13:58.360 --> 14:03.280] figured out, whoops, I'm a non-party, I better pretend like I'm counsel here. [14:03.280 --> 14:07.040] The defendants didn't answer, Randy. [14:07.040 --> 14:15.400] This lawyer, non-party, pretended he was filing something for the defendants and he lied to [14:15.400 --> 14:24.120] the court and said that there was an unopposed application for extension of time. [14:24.120 --> 14:29.560] It's the only thing that the rules would allow something to be filed at that point. [14:29.560 --> 14:34.160] But there wasn't any such thing, there was no, I didn't agree to extend any time, they [14:34.160 --> 14:35.760] didn't even ask. [14:35.760 --> 14:45.120] So I opposed it and they took, the magistrate judge has been ruling on everything, ruling [14:45.120 --> 14:52.080] against the law, against the rules, against common sense and predictably against me. [14:52.080 --> 14:56.280] So it looks like clear bias and I'm finding the things that the magistrate judge is doing [14:56.280 --> 15:04.040] wrong and I'm looking at the rules and saying, oh, she can't do that and I'm objecting [15:04.040 --> 15:05.040] to that. [15:05.040 --> 15:11.920] So I'm probably making a nuisance of myself in that office, not really intending to, but [15:11.920 --> 15:18.800] if they're going to get those kind of rulings and put nonsense out and call it good, I'm [15:18.800 --> 15:23.800] calling it not good and I'm referencing the rules that say so. [15:23.800 --> 15:31.560] At the same time, I now have this case open, so I took it upon myself to address the issue [15:31.560 --> 15:39.680] of not being allowed into the courthouse when I have a phone or they have a rule that says [15:39.680 --> 15:46.840] only attorneys or law enforcement get to walk into the courtroom with their whatever devices [15:46.840 --> 15:48.920] are in their pockets and stuff. [15:48.920 --> 15:53.400] If you're just regular Joe, nope, that's not allowed. [15:53.400 --> 16:02.120] So I said, you're asking me to give up one right to access another right and that's not [16:02.120 --> 16:03.120] okay. [16:03.120 --> 16:10.360] So I'm addressing that in the Fed and the way that I'm addressing it is just by putting [16:10.360 --> 16:15.520] a motion in while this other case is going on. [16:15.520 --> 16:19.560] I move that you would give me equal access to the courthouse so that I can talk to the [16:19.560 --> 16:22.800] district clerk. [16:22.800 --> 16:29.920] So that's an issue going on and there's another issue. [16:29.920 --> 16:31.640] It's been one thing after another. [16:31.640 --> 16:37.480] I know we're about to go to our break here and I'll just wrap it up with this. [16:37.480 --> 16:45.320] We've got today, we have a find, they've come out with what they call findings and recommendations [16:45.320 --> 16:52.440] and the magistrate judge is piping recommendations to the actual real judge, the Article 3 judge [16:52.440 --> 16:57.560] to recommend everything be dismissed, that all my case be dismissed. [16:57.560 --> 17:26.600] So I'll tell you on the other side, we'll be right back. [17:26.600 --> 17:52.360] And all dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly dearly, dearly [17:52.360 --> 17:53.440] dearly, dearly, dearly dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly dearly, dearly, [17:53.440 --> 17:54.440] dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly [17:54.440 --> 17:55.440] dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, [17:55.440 --> 17:56.120] dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, [17:55.000 --> 17:55.920] Dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, dearly, [17:55.920 --> 18:01.600] at yahoo.com to learn how to stop dead collectors next. [18:01.600 --> 18:05.640] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [18:05.640 --> 18:06.640] Word? [18:06.640 --> 18:12.140] Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for scripture [18:12.140 --> 18:18.560] talk where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2nd Timothy 2.15. [18:18.560 --> 18:23.060] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly [18:23.060 --> 18:25.480] dividing the Word of Truth. [18:25.480 --> 18:29.440] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark where we'll go verse [18:29.440 --> 18:32.760] by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [18:32.760 --> 18:37.400] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [18:37.400 --> 18:39.760] and Christian character development. [18:39.760 --> 18:44.280] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [18:44.280 --> 18:48.640] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness [18:48.640 --> 18:50.240] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [18:50.240 --> 18:57.520] So tune in to scripture talk live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and [18:57.520 --> 19:20.800] motivate your studies of the scriptures. [19:20.800 --> 19:48.960] We ask the Christians, and they don't have an answer, how they want we to take it easy, [19:48.960 --> 19:53.860] they might talk way too political and they might get hit not angry. [19:53.860 --> 20:00.080] But they might stand up and fight and fight for the freedom and the freedom, and let them [20:00.080 --> 20:03.440] love slavery and get handed out from the government. [20:03.440 --> 20:05.140] Okay we are back. [20:05.140 --> 20:12.460] This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton, I'm Brent Fountain and we're just going over [20:12.460 --> 20:18.840] what's happening with a simple traffic ticket that got turned into oh my goodness. [20:18.840 --> 20:28.880] Well, so right now, in the Fed, we have the case, they're trying to wrap it up. [20:28.880 --> 20:38.500] This is day 67, everything's supposed to be over on day 21, right, but day 67 and we're [20:38.500 --> 20:46.620] on document number 29 and the defendants still have yet to answer anything. [20:46.620 --> 20:54.920] And that non-party who later tried to appear as counsel, they didn't file anything while [20:54.920 --> 21:04.780] they were counseled, but they did file the answer with a motion to 12b6 standard nonsense. [21:04.780 --> 21:14.480] And so right now, we have the recommendations are before the Article 3 judge and I'm just [21:14.480 --> 21:15.480] looking at it. [21:15.480 --> 21:19.800] I'm looking today and I can already see so many things are wrong with it. [21:19.800 --> 21:26.560] So I'll be addressing those and at the same time, meanwhile, back at the ranch, we have [21:26.560 --> 21:33.920] in the speeding ticket case itself, so that has come to a ruling, but it's not final yet [21:33.920 --> 21:39.600] because it could be appealed and I actually did an extension of that time because of a [21:39.600 --> 21:41.880] motion for new trial. [21:41.880 --> 21:50.960] They ignored that, but by me filing that, it gave an extra time, it gave extra time. [21:50.960 --> 21:56.840] So I got a longer deadline to appeal, but I actually discovered there's another rule [21:56.840 --> 22:01.120] that allows for a cert in this case, certiorari. [22:01.120 --> 22:16.160] So I have asked the county court to issue a writ to the JP court and this writ of certiorari [22:16.160 --> 22:22.760] is appropriate when the lower court never acquired jurisdiction in the first place. [22:22.760 --> 22:28.960] So it doesn't fit every situation, but a lot of them actually try to do these kinds of [22:28.960 --> 22:31.640] things without ever acquiring jurisdiction. [22:31.640 --> 22:33.840] So the cert fits. [22:33.840 --> 22:41.040] I am asking the appellate court to issue a writ that commands the lower court to do several [22:41.040 --> 22:45.840] things, including show all the paperwork that you have that started this case and of course [22:45.840 --> 22:48.720] they have zero, none. [22:48.720 --> 22:51.840] So anyway, we'll see what happens with that. [22:51.840 --> 22:59.880] We have both things going at the same time, the federal case and the speeding ticket itself. [22:59.880 --> 23:04.040] I have some more news at some point, but that's where it is right now. [23:04.040 --> 23:09.320] Randy, it looks like we've got our whole caller board filled up. [23:09.320 --> 23:11.640] Are you ready to go ahead and go to some callers? [23:11.640 --> 23:15.480] I am ready and we have a couple of first time callers. [23:15.480 --> 23:25.960] The first one, we're going to go to 337 Errico, that's Lake Charles, Louisiana. [23:25.960 --> 23:29.840] If you're a local Kunas, talk to us. [23:29.840 --> 23:30.840] Hello. [23:30.840 --> 23:36.960] You have to be a Kunas, you can't be a Redbone in Lake Charles. [23:36.960 --> 23:40.280] Okay, got a couple of problems with that. [23:40.280 --> 23:41.280] Can you hear me for sure? [23:41.280 --> 23:43.400] Yeah, I can hear you. [23:43.400 --> 23:47.680] Okay, not a Kunas, Texas is not a place. [23:47.680 --> 23:50.160] Do they let none Kunases in Lake Charles? [23:50.160 --> 23:56.280] I had a brother-in-law from Lake Charles, I love that place. [23:56.280 --> 24:00.600] Well I don't care that much for it, I'd rather be in Texas, but got me a little traffic ticket [24:00.600 --> 24:05.960] in 2014 and moved over here where I thought it'd be easier to fight it because I got rent [24:05.960 --> 24:06.960] free living. [24:06.960 --> 24:09.880] This is Ralph in Texas. [24:09.880 --> 24:19.040] Oh, okay, you came up as unscreened and I looked up 337 and it was Lake Charles, Louisiana. [24:19.040 --> 24:23.400] Well I got tired of that telephone tracking me, so I just dumped it and got a house phone [24:23.400 --> 24:24.400] now. [24:24.400 --> 24:25.400] Oh, okay. [24:25.400 --> 24:30.520] But I'm going to come up with a different number pretty soon I hope when I get back [24:30.520 --> 24:31.520] to Texas. [24:31.520 --> 24:33.960] Okay, so you are in Texas. [24:33.960 --> 24:37.240] No, I'm in Louisiana right now. [24:37.240 --> 24:38.240] Now I'm confused. [24:38.240 --> 24:43.920] Okay, but the ticket's out of Texas. [24:43.920 --> 24:49.240] It's Ralph in Texas, but he's currently geographically in Louisiana. [24:49.240 --> 24:55.960] You're on the air live, you've got to give us a thoughtful, insightful question. [24:55.960 --> 25:01.360] If you're going to challenge me, I'll try to do what I can. [25:01.360 --> 25:06.240] How about proactive statement of law out of your own mouth? [25:06.240 --> 25:07.240] Don't do it. [25:07.240 --> 25:08.640] Let's make one of those. [25:08.640 --> 25:15.120] Okay, well you did one and I want to ask you for your case law behind it. [25:15.120 --> 25:17.120] Okay. [25:17.120 --> 25:23.080] You've done it several times, so I might have been missing the case law behind it. [25:23.080 --> 25:28.680] It's one of your stock statements and it sounds great and tell you the truth, Randy, I have [25:28.680 --> 25:31.680] not had a chance to get on the internet and look for it. [25:31.680 --> 25:35.160] I just listen and think that you're going to tell the rest of the story so to speak [25:35.160 --> 25:37.240] and you tell a lot of stories, so I like them. [25:37.240 --> 25:38.240] I'm tuning in. [25:38.240 --> 25:41.240] You got me hanging over the cliff. [25:41.240 --> 25:42.240] Come on. [25:42.240 --> 25:43.240] Come on. [25:43.240 --> 25:47.680] Well, I'm going to get you real close, bring you back and then give you another one. [25:47.680 --> 25:48.680] How's that? [25:48.680 --> 25:51.680] That'll work. [25:51.680 --> 25:53.160] Okay. [25:53.160 --> 26:02.680] The judge can only act on facts and law as has been presented to him. [26:02.680 --> 26:07.680] Walker v. Packer. [26:07.680 --> 26:13.920] Judge has no discretion in properly applying law to the facts. [26:13.920 --> 26:17.000] A failure to do so is an abuse of discretion. [26:17.000 --> 26:20.040] There's nothing else before the judge. [26:20.040 --> 26:24.600] There's nothing else for him to do when he sits in the courtroom. [26:24.600 --> 26:30.520] We present the facts and law to him and he rules on facts and law. [26:30.520 --> 26:31.520] That's his job as a judge. [26:31.520 --> 26:37.560] Now, he does have some administrative things he can do, like he can prevent you from standing [26:37.560 --> 26:43.240] in the courtroom naked and he can turn your cell phones off and that's questionable whether [26:43.240 --> 26:49.360] you can do that or not, but he can maintain the decorum of the court, but he doesn't do [26:49.360 --> 26:52.160] that in a judicial capacity. [26:52.160 --> 26:56.440] He does that in an administrative capacity. [26:56.440 --> 27:07.200] What he does in a judicial capacity is he listens to the lawyers bring the facts and [27:07.200 --> 27:13.760] law before him and then he rules on the facts and law. [27:13.760 --> 27:14.760] Okay. [27:14.760 --> 27:15.760] Okay. [27:15.760 --> 27:21.360] I can't give you very many good examples, but it seems like, well, maybe it's the Brunson [27:21.360 --> 27:22.360] case. [27:22.360 --> 27:27.120] I've started reading, I've downloaded several papers from the U.S. Supreme Court and haven't [27:27.120 --> 27:28.960] read them all. [27:28.960 --> 27:33.320] One of them's got the original complaint in it and another one doesn't, so I haven't sorted [27:33.320 --> 27:34.320] that out. [27:34.320 --> 27:39.320] To be honest, I've only spent an hour or two on it, so it's coming, but what I was going [27:39.320 --> 27:47.700] to say was it seems like there are other things saying that a judge can't just bring a case [27:47.700 --> 27:49.880] law on his own. [27:49.880 --> 27:54.880] That's what Walker v. Packer's saying, or you're interpreting it to say that. [27:54.880 --> 28:00.440] There is case law to that effect, and I've seen it years ago, but it's not something [28:00.440 --> 28:09.040] that came up often, so the judge is not there to litigate the case. [28:09.040 --> 28:15.440] That's what the lawyers are there for, and judges are not to go out and do their own [28:15.440 --> 28:16.440] research. [28:16.440 --> 28:21.200] It's your job to bring them the facts in law. [28:21.200 --> 28:27.720] Okay, I'm about to fall off the cliff there. [28:27.720 --> 28:28.720] Hang on. [28:28.720 --> 28:36.320] Randy Kelton, Brent Felton, Rule of Law Radio, our call-in number, 512-646-1984, we'll be [28:36.320 --> 28:42.320] right back. [28:42.320 --> 28:58.080] Privacy is under attack. [28:58.080 --> 29:02.480] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy [29:02.480 --> 29:07.920] is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too, so protect your rights, say [29:07.920 --> 29:12.480] no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [29:12.480 --> 29:14.240] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [29:14.240 --> 29:18.520] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [29:18.520 --> 29:22.080] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [29:22.080 --> 29:25.760] Start over with StartPage. [29:25.760 --> 29:30.520] Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle [29:30.520 --> 29:34.400] your personal information, but what happens if it escapes their control? [29:34.400 --> 29:40.600] It's not an idle question, according to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies [29:40.600 --> 29:44.160] admit their security was breached by hackers in the last year. [29:44.160 --> 29:47.840] That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com. [29:47.840 --> 29:52.680] Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you. [29:52.680 --> 29:56.080] They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals [29:56.080 --> 29:57.080] to see. [29:57.080 --> 29:58.080] The cupboard would be bare. [29:58.080 --> 30:01.560] Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way. [30:01.560 --> 30:11.440] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [30:11.440 --> 30:12.440] I lost my son. [30:12.440 --> 30:13.440] My nephew. [30:13.440 --> 30:14.440] My uncle. [30:14.440 --> 30:15.440] My son. [30:15.440 --> 30:16.440] On September 11th, 2001. [30:16.440 --> 30:19.720] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th. [30:19.720 --> 30:23.800] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. [30:23.800 --> 30:27.720] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7. [30:27.720 --> 30:32.520] Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more [30:32.520 --> 30:33.520] to the story. [30:33.520 --> 30:34.520] Bring justice to my son. [30:34.520 --> 30:35.520] My uncle. [30:35.520 --> 30:36.520] My nephew. [30:36.520 --> 30:37.520] My son. [30:37.520 --> 30:38.520] Go to buildingwhat.org. [30:38.520 --> 30:39.520] Why it fell. [30:39.520 --> 30:40.520] Why it matters. [30:40.520 --> 30:41.520] And what you can do. [30:41.520 --> 30:45.920] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. [30:45.920 --> 30:49.760] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going [30:49.760 --> 30:53.880] to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [30:53.880 --> 30:56.920] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [30:56.920 --> 31:00.920] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [31:00.920 --> 31:04.800] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [31:04.800 --> 31:06.160] our rights through due process. [31:06.160 --> 31:10.160] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the [31:10.160 --> 31:13.920] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process [31:13.920 --> 31:16.320] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [31:16.320 --> 31:20.320] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [31:20.320 --> 31:21.640] ordering your copy today. [31:21.640 --> 31:24.920] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [31:24.920 --> 31:29.400] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [31:29.400 --> 31:31.720] documents, and other useful resource material. [31:31.720 --> 31:35.680] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [31:35.680 --> 31:41.760] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [31:41.760 --> 31:47.080] Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [31:47.080 --> 32:06.080] Yeah, Mr. Office, I've been taking the line ahead, won't you follow the law of the land? [32:06.080 --> 32:21.080] I've been taking the line ahead, won't you follow the law of the land? [32:21.080 --> 32:34.080] I've been taking the line ahead, won't you follow the law of the land? [32:34.080 --> 32:59.080] I've been taking the line ahead, won't you follow the law of the land? [32:59.080 --> 33:27.080] I've been taking the line ahead, won't you follow the law of the land? [33:27.080 --> 33:52.080] I've been taking the line ahead, won't you follow the law of the land? [33:52.080 --> 33:59.080] I've been taking the line ahead, won't you follow the law of the land? [33:59.080 --> 34:20.080] I've been taking the line ahead, won't you follow the law of the land? [34:20.080 --> 34:47.080] I've been taking the line ahead, won't you follow the law of the land? [34:47.080 --> 35:14.080] I've been taking the line ahead, won't you follow the law of the land? [35:14.080 --> 35:39.080] I've been taking the line ahead, won't you follow the law of the land? [35:39.080 --> 35:50.080] Okay, so I have a question, this is kind of a jurisdiction question, like who has jurisdiction, okay? [35:50.080 --> 35:59.080] If you've got a federal case of a federal law, this federal law has been violated, [35:59.080 --> 36:07.080] and you live in one state, and laws have been violated in two different states, [36:07.080 --> 36:11.080] how hard is it to figure out jurisdiction for something like that? [36:11.080 --> 36:16.080] Depends on the nature of the laws that have been violated and who violated them. [36:16.080 --> 36:27.080] If they were violated to your detriment, okay, if I'm from Texas and I'm in Louisiana, [36:27.080 --> 36:33.080] and someone in Louisiana violates the law and does me harm, Louisiana has jurisdiction. [36:33.080 --> 36:40.080] The fact that I'm from Texas is not really relevant if I am in Louisiana, [36:40.080 --> 36:48.080] but if someone in Louisiana harms me in Texas, then that goes to diversity jurisdiction, [36:48.080 --> 36:53.080] and the feds would have jurisdiction. [36:53.080 --> 37:01.080] If someone does something that violates a federal law, the feds would have jurisdiction. [37:01.080 --> 37:09.080] Okay, so without giving up a case or getting too detailed, let me see if I can give just a little more information. [37:09.080 --> 37:16.080] A person's living in Louisiana, and criminal acts are violated against them in Louisiana, [37:16.080 --> 37:22.080] but when they go to Texas, some of the same stuff is happening there. [37:22.080 --> 37:24.080] I got one, I got one. [37:24.080 --> 37:29.080] Not necessarily what's happening, but this is a good scenario, just the same. [37:29.080 --> 37:32.080] A person's living in Louisiana, we'll use Louisiana, Texas as an example. [37:32.080 --> 37:38.080] A person's living in Louisiana, their car is vandalized in Louisiana, [37:38.080 --> 37:44.080] but when they go to Texas, their car is also vandalized in Texas. [37:44.080 --> 37:51.080] Now, two state issues, one in Louisiana, one in Texas. [37:51.080 --> 37:57.080] The two incidents are not necessarily directly connected. [37:57.080 --> 38:04.080] Unless the same guy came from Louisiana to Texas to commit this crime, [38:04.080 --> 38:11.080] if he crossed the state line for the purpose of committing a crime, then you have diversity jurisdiction. [38:11.080 --> 38:16.080] But if it was a different guy, these are two separate incidents. [38:16.080 --> 38:21.080] But if it's not the same guy, it's one incident, okay, one more along the same line. [38:21.080 --> 38:30.080] Residents and domicile, a person's domiciled in their domiciled state, like we'll say Texas, [38:30.080 --> 38:38.080] residents in Louisiana, and laws are violated against them in Louisiana only. [38:38.080 --> 38:41.080] Would they have jurisdiction? [38:41.080 --> 38:43.080] Well, I guess they wouldn't have jurisdiction in anywhere but Louisiana. [38:43.080 --> 38:46.080] But if it was federal laws, yeah, that's what I'm trying to say. [38:46.080 --> 38:49.080] So, Texas or Louisiana? [38:49.080 --> 38:58.080] If the person is in Louisiana and Louisiana laws are violated against him in Louisiana, [38:58.080 --> 39:01.080] makes no difference where he's domiciled. [39:01.080 --> 39:11.080] Once he moves his person across the jurisdictional boundary, he comes under the jurisdiction. [39:11.080 --> 39:14.080] So if I drive, I'm domiciled in Texas. [39:14.080 --> 39:20.080] If I drive to Louisiana and somebody commits a crime against me, that doesn't become federal [39:20.080 --> 39:23.080] just because I'm from Texas. [39:23.080 --> 39:28.080] There has to be some sort of a nexus with Texas. [39:28.080 --> 39:31.080] Well, you've already given me what I needed. [39:31.080 --> 39:32.080] Okay. [39:32.080 --> 39:36.080] When you said if it's the same person or not. [39:36.080 --> 39:39.080] Right, if it's not the same person, they're totally separate incidents. [39:39.080 --> 39:41.080] If it is the same person. [39:41.080 --> 39:45.080] I knew that, but it wasn't thinking of it in the proper context. [39:45.080 --> 39:47.080] You just put it in the proper context and now it makes sense. [39:47.080 --> 39:50.080] Yes. [39:50.080 --> 39:52.080] That's why I get the big bucks. [39:52.080 --> 39:54.080] Let me go one further. [39:54.080 --> 39:58.080] I tried listening to Eddie this last Monday. [39:58.080 --> 40:00.080] I was thinking about calling him. [40:00.080 --> 40:02.080] Driver's license compact. [40:02.080 --> 40:09.080] So if you live in Texas, you're under Texas commercial code, transportation code, [40:09.080 --> 40:15.080] transportation code, whatever, and you go out of state and they give you a traffic ticket [40:15.080 --> 40:22.080] and they're a member of the driver's license compact, I think is what it's called. [40:22.080 --> 40:26.080] But if you can decipher it for me, I'd appreciate it. [40:26.080 --> 40:28.080] What I'm trying to get at is this. [40:28.080 --> 40:31.080] Well, there are multiple of those. [40:31.080 --> 40:34.080] That compact is one. [40:34.080 --> 40:39.080] There are actually four that I know of. [40:39.080 --> 40:48.080] There are only two states that don't have anything to do with three of them. [40:48.080 --> 40:51.080] All 50 have to do with the fourth one. [40:51.080 --> 40:56.080] They're all on board with the fourth one, which is the National Driver Registry. [40:56.080 --> 40:58.080] National Driver Registry. [40:58.080 --> 41:02.080] Yes, that's the one where if your license is suspended, revoked, [41:02.080 --> 41:05.080] or something, you're in trouble in one state, [41:05.080 --> 41:08.080] then you can't go to another state and get a license [41:08.080 --> 41:11.080] because you have to fix whatever was wrong in the first state. [41:11.080 --> 41:14.080] That one they all participate in. [41:14.080 --> 41:19.080] But the other three have things to do with if you get points on one, [41:19.080 --> 41:21.080] then we're going to ding you in the other state, [41:21.080 --> 41:26.080] or if there's an equivalent infraction here, [41:26.080 --> 41:31.080] then we're going to prosecute you in this state for what happened over there. [41:31.080 --> 41:38.080] There are different kinds of data sharing set up in those other ones, but yeah. [41:38.080 --> 41:40.080] Here's the problem. [41:40.080 --> 41:46.080] The driver's license is a contract. [41:46.080 --> 41:48.080] Not under statutory law. [41:48.080 --> 41:57.080] You agree when you get the driver's license to a contract with the state. [41:57.080 --> 42:05.080] So these, they can contract however they want to. [42:05.080 --> 42:07.080] Okay. [42:07.080 --> 42:09.080] That's the problem with that. [42:09.080 --> 42:12.080] Yes, they can make these contracts between one another. [42:12.080 --> 42:19.080] Well, could you use the technicals from the Texas Transportation Code, [42:19.080 --> 42:22.080] the fact that it's commercial in the other state? [42:22.080 --> 42:24.080] No. [42:24.080 --> 42:26.080] You can't use your home law? [42:26.080 --> 42:27.080] No, you cannot. [42:27.080 --> 42:28.080] Hang on. [42:28.080 --> 42:30.080] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll use our radio. [42:30.080 --> 42:36.080] We'll be right back. [42:36.080 --> 42:37.080] I love Logos. [42:37.080 --> 42:41.080] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [42:41.080 --> 42:43.080] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [42:43.080 --> 42:44.080] I need my truth fix. [42:44.080 --> 42:46.080] I'd be lost without Logos. [42:46.080 --> 42:49.080] And I really want to help keep this network on the air. [42:49.080 --> 42:52.080] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, [42:52.080 --> 42:56.080] and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [42:56.080 --> 42:58.080] How can I help Logos? [42:58.080 --> 43:00.080] Well, I'm glad you asked. [43:00.080 --> 43:03.080] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos. [43:03.080 --> 43:05.080] You can order your supplies or holiday gifts. [43:05.080 --> 43:07.080] First thing you do is clear your cookies. [43:07.080 --> 43:11.080] Now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. [43:11.080 --> 43:14.080] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [43:14.080 --> 43:17.080] Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, [43:17.080 --> 43:19.080] and Logos gets a few pesos. [43:19.080 --> 43:20.080] Do I pay extra? [43:20.080 --> 43:21.080] No. [43:21.080 --> 43:23.080] Do I have to do anything different when I order? [43:23.080 --> 43:24.080] No. [43:24.080 --> 43:25.080] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [43:25.080 --> 43:26.080] No. [43:26.080 --> 43:27.080] I mean, yes. [43:27.080 --> 43:28.080] Wow. [43:28.080 --> 43:30.080] Giving without doing anything or spending any money. [43:30.080 --> 43:32.080] This is perfect. [43:32.080 --> 43:33.080] Thank you so much. [43:33.080 --> 43:34.080] We are welcome. [43:34.080 --> 43:37.080] Happy holidays, Logos. [43:37.080 --> 43:40.080] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [43:40.080 --> 43:44.080] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, [43:44.080 --> 43:50.080] the affordable, easy-to-understand core CD course that will show you how in 24 hours. [43:50.080 --> 43:52.080] Step-by-step. [43:52.080 --> 43:55.080] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [43:55.080 --> 43:59.080] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [43:59.080 --> 44:04.080] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [44:04.080 --> 44:10.080] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [44:10.080 --> 44:15.080] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [44:15.080 --> 44:19.080] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [44:19.080 --> 44:25.080] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [44:25.080 --> 44:28.080] pro se tactics, and much more. [44:28.080 --> 44:50.080] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [44:50.080 --> 45:16.080] Okay, we are back, Randy Felton, Brett Felton, Rule of Law Radio, [45:16.080 --> 45:26.080] and yeah, as far as I understand, the driver's license contract is a commercial contract, [45:26.080 --> 45:31.080] and the states can contract with one another however they choose, [45:31.080 --> 45:42.080] but when you physically put yourself within the jurisdictional boundaries of a state, [45:42.080 --> 45:46.080] you're bound to that state's laws, not your state laws, [45:46.080 --> 45:51.080] the only laws that carry over the federal laws. [45:51.080 --> 45:59.080] Okay, okay, so I'm thinking there's, my mind could find some more to that [45:59.080 --> 46:04.080] if I was to do some digging because I just keep thinking in my head that, [46:04.080 --> 46:09.080] well, they're stomping you for a traffic violation that's in their state, [46:09.080 --> 46:12.080] but they ask you for your home state driver's license, [46:12.080 --> 46:15.080] and your home state doesn't require you to have a driver's license, [46:15.080 --> 46:20.080] so you say, okay, my home state doesn't require me to have a driver's license. [46:20.080 --> 46:24.080] I'm domiciled in a state that only recognizes commercial drivers, [46:24.080 --> 46:30.080] and I don't know, probably be the same hassle in any court. [46:30.080 --> 46:32.080] Yes, they would. [46:32.080 --> 46:37.080] So I did find a couple questions I had written down. [46:37.080 --> 46:42.080] Redress of grievance, is that for anything, [46:42.080 --> 46:46.080] or does that term specifically mean redress of grievance [46:46.080 --> 46:50.080] that you file in the court against public servants? [46:50.080 --> 46:57.080] No, no, you can file civil complaints against ordinary people. [46:57.080 --> 47:01.080] Okay, so that's part of redress of grievance. [47:01.080 --> 47:06.080] That's what I thought, but you can't find that kind of answer in a book. [47:06.080 --> 47:11.080] People with experience such as yourself and Brett know those kind of things. [47:11.080 --> 47:20.080] So is there a private citizen version of due process violation? [47:20.080 --> 47:24.080] Due process only goes to private citizens. [47:24.080 --> 47:30.080] No, I mean, can a private citizen violate another private citizen's due process rights? [47:30.080 --> 47:32.080] Absolutely. [47:32.080 --> 47:33.080] Okay, okay. [47:33.080 --> 47:43.080] You could do a citizen's arrest on me and not take me to a magistrate. [47:43.080 --> 47:46.080] Okay. [47:46.080 --> 47:49.080] If I had time, I could probably come up with a number of... [47:49.080 --> 47:56.080] If you do something and the law commands that it be done a certain way [47:56.080 --> 48:00.080] and you do it different, I have a right to expect that it will be done [48:00.080 --> 48:04.080] in accordance with the black letter law. [48:04.080 --> 48:07.080] That goes to procedural due process. [48:07.080 --> 48:08.080] And that's a right. [48:08.080 --> 48:09.080] That's an inherent right. [48:09.080 --> 48:12.080] It's protected. [48:12.080 --> 48:13.080] Okay. [48:13.080 --> 48:17.080] In both the federal and the state constitution. [48:17.080 --> 48:20.080] Okay. [48:20.080 --> 48:23.080] In Texas, they call it the due course of the law. [48:23.080 --> 48:28.080] We have a right to the due course of the laws. [48:28.080 --> 48:34.080] For instance, you can't block me from coming into a restaurant [48:34.080 --> 48:41.080] by somebody else's rights unless it would be like denying access to a building, [48:41.080 --> 48:45.080] but that would practically be an assault charge. [48:45.080 --> 48:47.080] If I was trying to get into a building and someone says, [48:47.080 --> 48:50.080] I'm not going to let you in there because they're picketing or something, [48:50.080 --> 48:52.080] would that be like a due process right? [48:52.080 --> 48:56.080] I have the right to go in this building and they're hindering me, [48:56.080 --> 48:58.080] they're stopping me. [48:58.080 --> 48:59.080] There. [48:59.080 --> 49:00.080] Okay. [49:00.080 --> 49:04.080] You have to stop talking sometimes so I can answer. [49:04.080 --> 49:07.080] No, that would not. [49:07.080 --> 49:12.080] If you're trying to get into a building and someone's blocking you [49:12.080 --> 49:16.080] because you're picketing, that would not be due process. [49:16.080 --> 49:21.080] If they're blocking you because you're black or because you're white [49:21.080 --> 49:30.080] or because you're a Muslim or a Jew, that would be a due process [49:30.080 --> 49:33.080] because we have laws specifically for beating that. [49:33.080 --> 49:35.080] Does that make sense, Ralph? [49:35.080 --> 49:39.080] Yes. [49:39.080 --> 49:41.080] Okay. [49:41.080 --> 49:43.080] You did good. [49:43.080 --> 49:44.080] I did? Wow. [49:44.080 --> 49:45.080] Yeah, you did. [49:45.080 --> 49:46.080] Yeah, you did. [49:46.080 --> 49:49.080] I put you on the dime and you got off of it pretty good. [49:49.080 --> 49:52.080] Okay, we have a full board of callers, [49:52.080 --> 49:55.080] so we're going to drop you like a hot rock. [49:55.080 --> 49:56.080] Ouch. [49:56.080 --> 49:57.080] All right. [49:57.080 --> 49:58.080] Thank you. [49:58.080 --> 49:59.080] Have a good evening. [49:59.080 --> 50:00.080] Okay. [50:00.080 --> 50:05.080] Now we're going to go to another first-time caller. [50:05.080 --> 50:09.080] Was that Greg in California that was first-time? [50:09.080 --> 50:11.080] No, the other first-time caller dropped off. [50:11.080 --> 50:12.080] Oh, okay. [50:12.080 --> 50:14.080] And got replaced. [50:14.080 --> 50:18.080] Now the boards fall again, but we don't have any first-timers left. [50:18.080 --> 50:21.080] Okay, so now we're going to go to Greg in California. [50:21.080 --> 50:22.080] Hello, Greg. [50:22.080 --> 50:25.080] What do you have for us today? [50:25.080 --> 50:26.080] Hi, Brett. [50:26.080 --> 50:27.080] Hi, Randy. [50:27.080 --> 50:29.080] I've been doing research here, [50:29.080 --> 50:31.080] and I want to inform you and your audience, [50:31.080 --> 50:37.080] which I think we all know who all those people are. [50:37.080 --> 50:43.080] There was a woman named Catherine Watt who's been researching, [50:43.080 --> 50:50.080] I think for the last few years, into the whole COVID thing. [50:50.080 --> 50:55.080] And she has found that, and this is not just her, [50:55.080 --> 50:58.080] this is also a number of other people, [50:58.080 --> 51:00.080] but I think she was early on the research [51:00.080 --> 51:05.080] and found that all of this was not under the auspices [51:05.080 --> 51:08.080] of the U.S. government and Health and Human Services. [51:08.080 --> 51:14.080] It turns out that it was all done under the sponsorship [51:14.080 --> 51:18.080] and authority of the Department of Defense, [51:18.080 --> 51:22.080] that the COVID vaccine was never a vaccine. [51:22.080 --> 51:29.080] It was always a countermeasure prototype. [51:29.080 --> 51:33.080] What does that mean? [51:33.080 --> 51:39.080] That means that this was a military exercise conducted by the Department of Defense, [51:39.080 --> 51:45.080] and the actual vaccine was never technically a vaccine. [51:45.080 --> 51:50.080] It was a countermeasure prototype that was done as a countermeasure. [51:50.080 --> 51:58.080] When I asked it, what does countermeasure prototype mean substantively? [51:58.080 --> 52:02.080] I can guess what countermeasure prototype means. [52:02.080 --> 52:08.080] It means that there was a, my understanding is that it was a countermeasure to a bioweapon, [52:08.080 --> 52:17.080] the bioweapon which was also financed and researched by the Department of Defense and DARPA [52:17.080 --> 52:23.080] both in the United States and in Wuhan, and again, it was a military exercise. [52:23.080 --> 52:29.080] So the countermeasure prototype is an unknown set of chemicals [52:29.080 --> 52:35.080] that did not have to be disclosed for various reasons and was not under FDA [52:35.080 --> 52:42.080] or Health and Human Services or CDC authority. [52:42.080 --> 52:47.080] It's a very strange designation, but all the contracts are listed [52:47.080 --> 52:54.080] under the Department of Defense and they're published, and you can find them. [52:54.080 --> 52:58.080] How do we use that? [52:58.080 --> 53:01.080] What does that mean at the end of the day? [53:01.080 --> 53:07.080] What that means at the end of the day is that all of those, this is still an ongoing problem [53:07.080 --> 53:13.080] because the military and under the Department of Defense, Lloyd Austin, [53:13.080 --> 53:22.080] is still requiring military members to be vaccinated with this poison that has never been disclosed. [53:22.080 --> 53:24.080] Nobody knows what's in it. [53:24.080 --> 53:31.080] There's no consistency and the lawyers that are talking about discussing this now [53:31.080 --> 53:37.080] are recommending that you file fraud charges against the cities and counties and states, [53:37.080 --> 53:44.080] the employers that are requiring you to take this because it's never been properly represented [53:44.080 --> 53:49.080] and there's no way to understand what the ingredients are in any of this [53:49.080 --> 53:58.080] and they're almost trying to portray this as that the informed consent doesn't apply [53:58.080 --> 54:03.080] because it's not under, they're even trying to do an end run around the laws [54:03.080 --> 54:10.080] around informed consent under EUA and IND, which is an investigational new drug, [54:10.080 --> 54:17.080] which falls under research, but research includes data collection. [54:17.080 --> 54:24.080] So all of the testing and the DNA samples and the saliva samples and all of those things are data collection. [54:24.080 --> 54:31.080] Those all fall under EUAs and INDs and they're trying to actually not only do an end run [54:31.080 --> 54:36.080] around the FDA and all of the laws around that. [54:36.080 --> 54:43.080] We talked about the codes, the Code of Federal Regulations that regulate that stuff [54:43.080 --> 54:49.080] because it's not an actual USDUA. [54:49.080 --> 54:57.080] It's a DOD countermeasure prototype that is not even classified as a vaccine. [54:57.080 --> 54:59.080] So this is fraud. [54:59.080 --> 55:03.080] This is fraud perpetuated by the Department of Defense, the US government, [55:03.080 --> 55:08.080] and anybody that was asking you, telling you that you have to take this to be employed, [55:08.080 --> 55:16.080] whether it's, and it's worse as you get state, federal, county, and city, and employer. [55:16.080 --> 55:18.080] They're saying sue for fraud. [55:18.080 --> 55:20.080] So that's what the effect is. [55:20.080 --> 55:22.080] That's the bottom line. [55:22.080 --> 55:24.080] Do you have a source for this data? [55:24.080 --> 55:25.080] I do. [55:25.080 --> 55:32.080] You're speaking to this and I'm thinking, how would I adjudicate this? [55:32.080 --> 55:35.080] I would need specific data. [55:35.080 --> 55:38.080] That's why I ask about countermeasure. [55:38.080 --> 55:43.080] What does that mean as opposed to a vaccine? [55:43.080 --> 55:50.080] A countermeasure would essentially be something to counter a measure, [55:50.080 --> 55:55.080] and the virus was the measure. [55:55.080 --> 56:02.080] The countermeasure was the product used to counter. [56:02.080 --> 56:10.080] Okay, how is that different than the virus and a vaccine? [56:10.080 --> 56:15.080] It's essentially doing exactly the same thing. [56:15.080 --> 56:17.080] You're just using different words. [56:17.080 --> 56:21.080] Well, they're using different words, but you get into classifications. [56:21.080 --> 56:30.080] An example is the classification of camaraderie versus the biotech vaccine. [56:30.080 --> 56:34.080] They're not the same even though they've been to port and said, [56:34.080 --> 56:37.080] oh, yes, they're chemically the same, so therefore, [56:37.080 --> 56:40.080] even though the names are different, they're equivalent. [56:40.080 --> 56:48.080] That's not true because legally the chemical name is the distinction between one and another. [56:48.080 --> 56:55.080] You can't call Advil ibuprofen or it can have ibuprofen in it, [56:55.080 --> 56:58.080] and that's probably not the best example. [56:58.080 --> 57:02.080] Both help with a headache. [57:02.080 --> 57:05.080] At the end of the day, they're not the same thing, and I get your point. [57:05.080 --> 57:13.080] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back. [57:13.080 --> 57:16.080] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, [57:16.080 --> 57:21.080] yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [57:21.080 --> 57:24.080] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, [57:24.080 --> 57:29.080] but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. [57:29.080 --> 57:31.080] Enter the recovery version. [57:31.080 --> 57:35.080] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, [57:35.080 --> 57:40.080] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [57:40.080 --> 57:44.080] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [57:44.080 --> 57:50.080] providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [57:50.080 --> 57:56.080] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [57:56.080 --> 58:06.080] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [58:06.080 --> 58:10.080] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [58:10.080 --> 58:13.080] That's freestudybible.com. [58:13.080 --> 58:23.080] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [58:23.080 --> 58:28.080] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [58:28.080 --> 58:32.080] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [58:32.080 --> 58:34.080] Our liberty depends on it. [58:34.080 --> 58:40.080] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [58:40.080 --> 58:42.080] Privacy is under attack. [58:42.080 --> 58:45.080] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [58:45.080 --> 58:50.080] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [58:50.080 --> 58:55.080] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [58:55.080 --> 58:58.080] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [58:58.080 --> 59:01.080] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [59:01.080 --> 59:05.080] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [59:05.080 --> 59:09.080] Start over with Startpage. [59:09.080 --> 59:11.080] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. [59:11.080 --> 59:14.080] They pull back the covers and find a third party there. [59:14.080 --> 59:17.080] He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. [59:17.080 --> 59:23.080] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent. [59:23.080 --> 59:26.080] It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, [59:26.080 --> 59:29.080] a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. [59:29.080 --> 59:32.080] Third party, Third Amendment, get it? [59:32.080 --> 59:35.080] So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, [59:35.080 --> 59:40.080] tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment. [59:40.080 --> 59:54.080] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [59:54.080 --> 59:58.080] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [59:58.080 --> 01:00:01.080] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:00:01.080 --> 01:00:03.080] Our liberty depends on it. [01:00:03.080 --> 01:00:09.080] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:09.080 --> 01:00:11.080] Privacy is under attack. [01:00:11.080 --> 01:00:15.080] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:00:15.080 --> 01:00:20.080] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:00:20.080 --> 01:00:21.080] So protect your rights. [01:00:21.080 --> 01:00:25.080] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:00:25.080 --> 01:00:27.080] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [01:00:27.080 --> 01:00:31.080] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:00:31.080 --> 01:00:35.080] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:00:35.080 --> 01:00:39.080] Start over with StartPage. [01:00:39.080 --> 01:00:44.080] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles. [01:00:44.080 --> 01:00:50.080] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. [01:00:50.080 --> 01:00:53.080] Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it? [01:00:53.080 --> 01:00:58.080] Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security. [01:00:58.080 --> 01:01:02.080] Keeson Pointe, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. [01:01:02.080 --> 01:01:06.080] When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, [01:01:06.080 --> 01:01:09.080] I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells. [01:01:09.080 --> 01:01:13.080] Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights [01:01:13.080 --> 01:01:16.080] and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. [01:01:16.080 --> 01:01:33.080] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:02:16.080 --> 01:02:18.080] Okay, we are back. [01:02:18.080 --> 01:02:27.080] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio on this Thursday, the 12th day of January, 2023. [01:02:27.080 --> 01:02:29.080] And we're talking to Greg in California. [01:02:29.080 --> 01:02:36.080] And Greg, I was kind of standing on you there because this is too important. [01:02:36.080 --> 01:02:44.080] We need this in a way, we need to couch it in a way that it can be readily adjudicated. [01:02:44.080 --> 01:02:51.080] And that's why I made that distinction about the difference between a vaccine and a countermeasure. [01:02:51.080 --> 01:02:55.080] Are you there? [01:02:55.080 --> 01:02:57.080] I'm listening. [01:02:57.080 --> 01:03:04.080] Oh, I had you enthralled? Oh, wonderful. That doesn't happen often. [01:03:04.080 --> 01:03:10.080] Generally, like last week, we had a first-time caller and I put him to sleep. [01:03:10.080 --> 01:03:17.080] He was snoring. That's happened before. [01:03:17.080 --> 01:03:23.080] Listen, I understand your question. [01:03:23.080 --> 01:03:28.080] And the lawyers in this country that understand what's happening, [01:03:28.080 --> 01:03:40.080] they have meetings weekly or bi-weekly or bi-monthly to discuss strategies because it's unfolding in front of our eyes. [01:03:40.080 --> 01:03:46.080] So the first order of business, the fact is our government lied to us. [01:03:46.080 --> 01:03:53.080] Anthony Fauci lied to us as the representative of NIH AID or NIAID. [01:03:53.080 --> 01:04:01.080] The Health and Human Services lied to us that this is a military operation. [01:04:01.080 --> 01:04:07.080] We're under military medical martial law. [01:04:07.080 --> 01:04:13.080] Okay, wait a minute, wait a minute. Can you establish that other than imply it? [01:04:13.080 --> 01:04:15.080] I can establish it by contract. [01:04:15.080 --> 01:04:24.080] And the fact is that the DOD has implemented this and all of their contracts and all of their funding, funding in Moderna, [01:04:24.080 --> 01:04:31.080] funding of Moderna and then the contracts with the companies that manufactured the product, right? [01:04:31.080 --> 01:04:37.080] They're not even calling it a vaccine. They're calling it the product or the prototype. [01:04:37.080 --> 01:04:49.080] The fact of the matter is that the CDC, HHS, and all of the testing that they did were nothing more than a show [01:04:49.080 --> 01:04:56.080] to make everything look as real as it could look and make it look like this was something that was effective. [01:04:56.080 --> 01:05:03.080] And Pfizer's pleading, they had an affirmative defense to Brooke Jackson's case. [01:05:03.080 --> 01:05:14.080] Brooke Jackson was a woman in Texas that was working for a company called Ventana, who was a subcontractor for Pfizer to do testing. [01:05:14.080 --> 01:05:18.080] She was hired to be a supervisor. She had 20 years experience. [01:05:18.080 --> 01:05:25.080] And she called out all of the irregularities in the testing because there was nothing substantially correct about the testing, [01:05:25.080 --> 01:05:30.080] something similar to the courts that Brett is involved in every day, right? [01:05:30.080 --> 01:05:36.080] The products were not stored at the subzero temperatures they were supposed to be stored in. [01:05:36.080 --> 01:05:42.080] They unblinded the people in the blinded study. [01:05:42.080 --> 01:05:48.080] The irregularities were across the board absolutely crazy. [01:05:48.080 --> 01:05:54.080] Pfizer's affirmative defense was, well, the government knew we never really needed to do any testing. [01:05:54.080 --> 01:05:58.080] The government knew the tests were basically a fraud. [01:05:58.080 --> 01:06:08.080] The entire thing is a fraud. The entire thing in this country, the whole COVID pandemic and the vaccine is a fraud. [01:06:08.080 --> 01:06:10.080] And that's where we are today. [01:06:10.080 --> 01:06:14.080] Yeah, here you're kind of speaking to the gallery. [01:06:14.080 --> 01:06:19.080] Are you familiar with our Mass Flaw Society Telegram channel? [01:06:19.080 --> 01:06:21.080] Intimately. [01:06:21.080 --> 01:06:25.080] Good, good, good. I want to make sure it was on there. [01:06:25.080 --> 01:06:29.080] I posted, I've been posting on there. Yeah, I post on there. [01:06:29.080 --> 01:06:36.080] And there's two women. One of the women is a Russian woman, Petrov, and I can't remember, or Petria. [01:06:36.080 --> 01:06:40.080] I can't remember her last name. She was a researcher. [01:06:40.080 --> 01:06:47.080] She worked for these labs and these big companies as a researcher for this. [01:06:47.080 --> 01:06:54.080] And she did the research and Catherine Watt has done the research and they published their findings and they published the contracts. [01:06:54.080 --> 01:06:57.080] These were obtained through FOIA requests. [01:06:57.080 --> 01:07:03.080] And they show all the DOD contracts with all of the companies, including Moderna, AstraZeneca. [01:07:03.080 --> 01:07:11.080] Moderna was nothing without, they were nothing when the DOD started putting money into their company. [01:07:11.080 --> 01:07:13.080] And there were a couple of other companies. [01:07:13.080 --> 01:07:15.080] BioNTech was also a nothing company. [01:07:15.080 --> 01:07:21.080] These are big, these are, these are trillion dollar contracts. [01:07:21.080 --> 01:07:31.080] Trillion dollar contracts with these companies in the United States and including Fitbit to create things like a wearable device that could detect COVID. [01:07:31.080 --> 01:07:32.080] Well, we know COVID is gone. [01:07:32.080 --> 01:07:36.080] Viruses only last for one season and then they mutate. [01:07:36.080 --> 01:07:47.080] COVID in and of itself is a bio weapon, bio weaponized coronavirus that's lab created, that was funded also by DOD DARPA. [01:07:47.080 --> 01:07:52.080] Those are all things that are, that are provable at this point. [01:07:52.080 --> 01:07:56.080] You're not going to see them in mainstream media for sure, but this is what we're looking at. [01:07:56.080 --> 01:08:02.080] And I wanted to get that across to you and our wonderful listeners. [01:08:02.080 --> 01:08:04.080] How do we go after them? [01:08:04.080 --> 01:08:08.080] I'm thinking of depraved heart murder. [01:08:08.080 --> 01:08:09.080] I think so. [01:08:09.080 --> 01:08:13.080] I think that's an excellent approach. [01:08:13.080 --> 01:08:17.080] Fraud, attempted murder, depraved- [01:08:17.080 --> 01:08:19.080] No, no, fraud nothing. [01:08:19.080 --> 01:08:35.080] If you produce something and it has a potential to kill people and you know it has a potential to kill people and you hide that fact and people die as a result, that's depraved heart murder. [01:08:35.080 --> 01:08:39.080] Yeah, but then you have to prove that and you can prove that. [01:08:39.080 --> 01:08:41.080] It would take a lot of work to prove that. [01:08:41.080 --> 01:08:56.080] In fact, Brooke Jackson is in the process of proving that and she's suing as a relator and on behalf of the citizenry of the United States and that lawsuit is going to be in the trillions of dollars. [01:08:56.080 --> 01:09:00.080] So she's doing a private attorney general suit? [01:09:00.080 --> 01:09:03.080] No, she has attorneys that are working with her. [01:09:03.080 --> 01:09:04.080] That was a- [01:09:04.080 --> 01:09:05.080] No, no, no, no, no. [01:09:05.080 --> 01:09:08.080] This is a type of a suit. [01:09:08.080 --> 01:09:15.080] This is where she sues for herself and all others similarly situated. [01:09:15.080 --> 01:09:17.080] It's not a class action. [01:09:17.080 --> 01:09:19.080] Okay, no, that's not a class action. [01:09:19.080 --> 01:09:21.080] That's a private attorney general suit? [01:09:21.080 --> 01:09:24.080] Yeah, class actions get trashed. [01:09:24.080 --> 01:09:25.080] The lawyers trash them. [01:09:25.080 --> 01:09:36.080] But a private attorney general suit is a suit brought by one person in their benefit and in the benefit of all others similarly situated. [01:09:36.080 --> 01:09:59.080] I guess that's what it would be because it was- it has been said by Warner Mendenhall who is involved in that suit that- who's an attorney out of Ohio that that suit, I think he's representing her, that that is- it's because it's on behalf of the American people. [01:09:59.080 --> 01:10:03.080] It's in the trillions of dollars, trillion one plus trillion dollars. [01:10:03.080 --> 01:10:08.080] This is a special kind of suit that the courts have authorized. [01:10:08.080 --> 01:10:15.080] And from this we had the patriot mythologists all wanting to be a private attorney general. [01:10:15.080 --> 01:10:18.080] And that's because they didn't understand what this was. [01:10:18.080 --> 01:10:21.080] They thought they were actually a private attorney general. [01:10:21.080 --> 01:10:22.080] No, they weren't. [01:10:22.080 --> 01:10:24.080] That's just what the court named this kind of suit. [01:10:24.080 --> 01:10:25.080] Okay. [01:10:25.080 --> 01:10:28.080] I cannot verify that it's a private attorney general suit. [01:10:28.080 --> 01:10:30.080] No, it is almost certainly. [01:10:30.080 --> 01:10:41.080] If she's suing herself on behalf of the American public, that's a private attorney general suit. [01:10:41.080 --> 01:10:44.080] Yeah, well she's a whistleblower. [01:10:44.080 --> 01:10:47.080] So that's what she's working on there. [01:10:47.080 --> 01:10:49.080] But this is new information. [01:10:49.080 --> 01:10:52.080] So this information about the DOD- [01:10:52.080 --> 01:10:55.080] Wait a minute, wait a minute. [01:10:55.080 --> 01:10:59.080] Whistleblower, that's quite tam. [01:10:59.080 --> 01:11:01.080] That's exactly right. [01:11:01.080 --> 01:11:03.080] Okay, this is a quite tam suit. [01:11:03.080 --> 01:11:06.080] Okay, good. [01:11:06.080 --> 01:11:07.080] Thank you. [01:11:07.080 --> 01:11:08.080] I forgot that terminology. [01:11:08.080 --> 01:11:11.080] And I forget that because it's an odd expression. [01:11:11.080 --> 01:11:17.080] I've never come across that until I read her pleadings, which were actually sealed. [01:11:17.080 --> 01:11:19.080] And then they were unsealed. [01:11:19.080 --> 01:11:25.080] I believe when that case was accepted, after the case was accepted, it was unsealed for some reason. [01:11:25.080 --> 01:11:28.080] So it's an unsealed case, but it's still active. [01:11:28.080 --> 01:11:32.080] It has been accepted, and it's moving forward. [01:11:32.080 --> 01:11:38.080] And that would be, I believe, in the state of Texas because that's where it occurred, although it's probably a federal suit. [01:11:38.080 --> 01:11:40.080] It's probably in federal district court in Texas. [01:11:40.080 --> 01:11:48.080] Yeah, it would almost certainly be a federal case because it involves federal actors. [01:11:48.080 --> 01:11:49.080] Right. [01:11:49.080 --> 01:11:51.080] Okay, wonderful. [01:11:51.080 --> 01:11:53.080] Because we didn't know it was the DOD then. [01:11:53.080 --> 01:11:59.080] We thought it was Pfizer who was falsifying information, and certainly they were. [01:11:59.080 --> 01:12:01.080] They were falsifying information. [01:12:01.080 --> 01:12:08.080] In fact, at that time, this suit was filed, I think, a year and a half ago, maybe two years ago. [01:12:08.080 --> 01:12:19.080] At that time, Pfizer was aware that these things were being falsified, but they said their affirmative defense was, that's okay, the government knows they're false. [01:12:19.080 --> 01:12:23.080] The reason that the government knows they're false is this is under the DOD. [01:12:23.080 --> 01:12:26.080] They didn't require testing because— [01:12:26.080 --> 01:12:27.080] Wait a minute, wait a minute. [01:12:27.080 --> 01:12:30.080] How does that become an affirmative defense? [01:12:30.080 --> 01:12:41.080] Because that's what I'm saying because this is my understanding that Pfizer doesn't have to show any valid test results because this is not a vaccine. [01:12:41.080 --> 01:12:49.080] It's a prototype countermeasure that is not classified as a vaccine. [01:12:49.080 --> 01:12:54.080] Classifications mean everything, like the difference between a dog and a man. [01:12:54.080 --> 01:12:59.080] The problem is they called it a vaccine. [01:12:59.080 --> 01:13:02.080] You can't call it a vaccine and then come back and— [01:13:02.080 --> 01:13:05.080] Who called it a vaccine, Randy? [01:13:05.080 --> 01:13:09.080] Everyone who promoted it called it a vaccine. [01:13:09.080 --> 01:13:10.080] That's right. [01:13:10.080 --> 01:13:12.080] They promoted it, but they— [01:13:12.080 --> 01:13:15.080] It becomes a vaccine. [01:13:15.080 --> 01:13:20.080] You didn't sell me some prototype, you sold me a vaccine. [01:13:20.080 --> 01:13:23.080] And that's why it's fraud. [01:13:23.080 --> 01:13:26.080] Yes. [01:13:26.080 --> 01:13:29.080] And that's why it's fraud. [01:13:29.080 --> 01:13:31.080] This is where we are today. [01:13:31.080 --> 01:13:39.080] This is where in the most strange time that we've ever been, and this is not just in the United States, this is in the entire world. [01:13:39.080 --> 01:13:42.080] Pfizer had contracts with the EU. [01:13:42.080 --> 01:13:46.080] They're asking the same questions there. [01:13:46.080 --> 01:13:48.080] Good. [01:13:48.080 --> 01:13:59.080] When all this occurred, it seemed that they pushed this forward because Trump was causing so much difficulty. [01:13:59.080 --> 01:14:05.080] And I talked to this on the show, but I probably remember saying, they did this too soon. [01:14:05.080 --> 01:14:07.080] They weren't ready for it. [01:14:07.080 --> 01:14:10.080] And it looks like that's the case. [01:14:10.080 --> 01:14:12.080] It's coming back to haunt them. [01:14:12.080 --> 01:14:16.080] They didn't have all their pieces in place. [01:14:16.080 --> 01:14:17.080] They beat us. [01:14:17.080 --> 01:14:19.080] They got the vaccine out there. [01:14:19.080 --> 01:14:26.080] If it was their intention to decimate the population with this vaccine, they got that done. [01:14:26.080 --> 01:14:38.080] But they may actually not get by with it, or at least get away scot-free, because this worm is in the process of turning. [01:14:38.080 --> 01:14:48.080] With the Republicans in control of the House, that causes some very powerful changes. [01:14:48.080 --> 01:14:56.080] Where the laws, they can't change, what they can do is not fund them. [01:14:56.080 --> 01:15:00.080] That's some of the things they're doing right now that did that to the IRS. [01:15:00.080 --> 01:15:05.080] All these hundred thousand extra agents, they pull the funding for them. [01:15:05.080 --> 01:15:06.080] So that's out the window. [01:15:06.080 --> 01:15:07.080] Hang on. [01:15:07.080 --> 01:15:22.080] We'll be right back. [01:15:37.080 --> 01:15:39.080] We'll be right back. [01:16:07.080 --> 01:16:28.080] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:16:28.080 --> 01:16:32.080] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [01:16:32.080 --> 01:16:38.080] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two. [01:16:38.080 --> 01:16:44.080] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. [01:16:44.080 --> 01:16:48.080] What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons. [01:16:48.080 --> 01:16:50.080] How to answer letters and phone calls. [01:16:50.080 --> 01:16:52.080] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [01:16:52.080 --> 01:16:57.080] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:16:57.080 --> 01:17:02.080] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:17:02.080 --> 01:17:04.080] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:17:04.080 --> 01:17:10.080] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner. [01:17:10.080 --> 01:17:13.080] Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [01:17:13.080 --> 01:17:15.080] That's ruleoflawradio.com. [01:17:15.080 --> 01:17:24.080] Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:17:24.080 --> 01:17:34.080] This is the Logos Logos Radio Network. [01:17:54.080 --> 01:18:04.080] Thank you for listening. [01:18:24.080 --> 01:18:37.080] Okay, we are back. [01:18:37.080 --> 01:18:44.080] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Greg in California. [01:18:44.080 --> 01:18:47.080] Okay, Greg, do you have anything else for us? [01:18:47.080 --> 01:18:48.080] I do. [01:18:48.080 --> 01:18:52.080] I would like to add one more element to this to bring it into focus. [01:18:52.080 --> 01:18:56.080] Now, you're asking good questions like how do we approach this? [01:18:56.080 --> 01:18:57.080] How does this change anything? [01:18:57.080 --> 01:19:03.080] Well, it changes certain things, a certain, you know, I mean, it's going to change legal aspects. [01:19:03.080 --> 01:19:09.080] Lawyers are trying to figure out those legal aspects because we're, you know, there are many people in the military who are being dismissed [01:19:09.080 --> 01:19:19.080] because they're looking for religious exemptions or medical exemptions because they know that this is affecting their, you know, their bodies, their hearts, [01:19:19.080 --> 01:19:27.080] you know, all of the myocarditis and all of the things that are just amazing and not even side effects, direct effects. [01:19:27.080 --> 01:19:29.080] But here's the reality. [01:19:29.080 --> 01:19:39.080] We have, we've been lied to by the U.S. government, by the presidents, by, which would have been both Trump and Biden about this [01:19:39.080 --> 01:19:44.080] because we do know that Warp Speed was Trump's baby. [01:19:44.080 --> 01:19:47.080] That's when all this started. [01:19:47.080 --> 01:19:54.080] This is under the DOD and the funding went that all of the radio, the radio, I don't know about, you know, [01:19:54.080 --> 01:20:01.080] most of the radio stations, TV stations, newspapers are controlled by a few corporations. [01:20:01.080 --> 01:20:10.080] Pharma, we know for the TV stations, Pharma's 70% of their advertising is Big Pharma brought to you by Pfizer. [01:20:10.080 --> 01:20:13.080] I don't have TV, but I've heard the ads. [01:20:13.080 --> 01:20:22.080] Football, all of the elements in our society now are structured around these Big Pharma dollars and advertising, [01:20:22.080 --> 01:20:32.080] including whether they're sports or stadiums or, you know, we received in our little county in California, we've got CARES Act funds. [01:20:32.080 --> 01:20:34.080] Those CARES Act funds were from the U.S. government. [01:20:34.080 --> 01:20:36.080] Those were federal dollars. [01:20:36.080 --> 01:20:45.080] They spent those CARES Act funds advertising over and over and over on our local radio stations to take the vaccine. [01:20:45.080 --> 01:20:50.080] I mean, I'm telling you, you must have heard this thing a hundred times in a day. [01:20:50.080 --> 01:20:52.080] You had the school closures. [01:20:52.080 --> 01:20:54.080] You have the court closures. [01:20:54.080 --> 01:20:57.080] Our courts are still closed in California. [01:20:57.080 --> 01:21:00.080] You still have to go to Zoom court here, right? [01:21:00.080 --> 01:21:08.080] Unless you're like someone who has to show up to go to jail or for a warrant, everybody else does Zoom. [01:21:08.080 --> 01:21:11.080] And then they cut people off on those Zoom and they cut you off. [01:21:11.080 --> 01:21:13.080] Everybody's right. [01:21:13.080 --> 01:21:25.080] I mean, it's like, you know, bread situation times a hundred here in California that these federal dollars permeated the schools, the courts, the universities, [01:21:25.080 --> 01:21:28.080] the Pharma dollars permeated the advertising. [01:21:28.080 --> 01:21:30.080] This is where we are in this country. [01:21:30.080 --> 01:21:47.080] This is the reality of what we're looking at is a mass hysteria campaign over a bioweapon that was developed by DOD, DARPA, and the IAD and the Wuhan lab. [01:21:47.080 --> 01:21:50.080] This is what we're looking at in this country and the world. [01:21:50.080 --> 01:21:53.080] So I'm bringing this home to that point. [01:21:53.080 --> 01:22:02.080] The federal dollars, there's a nexus almost at every single intersection in this country with federal dollars and Department of Defense. [01:22:02.080 --> 01:22:05.080] Now, is this some secret program that we don't know about? [01:22:05.080 --> 01:22:14.080] Is this some, you know, it's never been discussed, but we know the fact that all these contracts exist because this has been gained through FOIA requests. [01:22:14.080 --> 01:22:17.080] Okay. So what is the remedy? [01:22:17.080 --> 01:22:25.080] I don't know. If I knew that, I'd probably have my own radio show. [01:22:25.080 --> 01:22:30.080] Oh, okay. I was hoping for remedy. [01:22:30.080 --> 01:22:40.080] It's not nice to come in here and tell us about all the bad stuff without a path to redemption. [01:22:40.080 --> 01:22:43.080] Well, I think John from New York might have some of that for us. [01:22:43.080 --> 01:22:49.080] He's up for talking about this together if you want to have them interact a little on the air. [01:22:49.080 --> 01:22:53.080] Okay, John. What's our remedy? [01:22:53.080 --> 01:22:55.080] Okay. Are you asking me? [01:22:55.080 --> 01:22:56.080] Yeah. [01:22:56.080 --> 01:22:59.080] Okay. This gentleman is very knowledgeable. [01:22:59.080 --> 01:23:02.080] I don't know who he is, but he's right on the target. [01:23:02.080 --> 01:23:06.080] He's right over the target, and he's firing both barrels. [01:23:06.080 --> 01:23:07.080] He's good. [01:23:07.080 --> 01:23:15.080] Now, DARPA, what you have, there was so much fraud involved, it would take several minutes. [01:23:15.080 --> 01:23:29.080] It would take an hour just to go into the fraud that went into making of COVID, making the virus in the lab, and creating a vaccine before the virus even made it out on the street. [01:23:29.080 --> 01:23:31.080] A lot of people aren't aware of that. [01:23:31.080 --> 01:23:35.080] But anyway, this guy knows what he's talking about. You're good. [01:23:35.080 --> 01:23:41.080] All right. Now, he mentioned government contracts. [01:23:41.080 --> 01:23:45.080] The pharmaceutical companies are really just a cover. [01:23:45.080 --> 01:23:50.080] The pharmaceutical companies are really just a cover story. [01:23:50.080 --> 01:23:58.080] DARPA was the one that was instrumental in doing all this research in the lab. [01:23:58.080 --> 01:24:09.080] They've known for the last several decades that you cannot have a cold vaccine for the common cold, and there's a reason for that. [01:24:09.080 --> 01:24:24.080] Many of the spike proteins that are found on the surface of the cold viruses are very, very similar to many of the proteins inside the human body. [01:24:24.080 --> 01:24:37.080] So when you have a vaccine that's supposed to eradicate one set of cold spike proteins or proteins, it's going to also kill the body's proteins, and it's going to hurt the body. [01:24:37.080 --> 01:24:39.080] So they've known that for decades. [01:24:39.080 --> 01:24:41.080] That's why nobody has come up. [01:24:41.080 --> 01:24:46.080] That's one of the reasons why nobody's come up with a cold vaccine as yet. [01:24:46.080 --> 01:24:58.080] All right. So COVID-19, and I want to point out, these are all kind of facts now that I'm going to throw at you, and you're going to see how they fit in perfectly to what this gentleman is saying. [01:24:58.080 --> 01:25:00.080] Is he still on the air with us? [01:25:00.080 --> 01:25:02.080] Yes, Greg in California. [01:25:02.080 --> 01:25:07.080] Greg, you're good. You did your homework, Greg. You really did. [01:25:07.080 --> 01:25:12.080] All right. COVID-19 test kits were being distributed worldwide. [01:25:12.080 --> 01:25:16.080] Now, get this. It doesn't take a brilliant scientist to figure this out. [01:25:16.080 --> 01:25:27.080] The COVID-19 test kits were being distributed worldwide in 2017 and 2018 as COVID-19 test kits. [01:25:27.080 --> 01:25:30.080] You say, well, what's significant about that? [01:25:30.080 --> 01:25:40.080] Well, when you stop to consider that they were calling it the coronavirus, and they didn't refer to it as COVID-19 until April of 2020. [01:25:40.080 --> 01:25:50.080] And here they're circulating all these test kits worldwide and exporting them to many countries in 2017 and 2018. [01:25:50.080 --> 01:25:54.080] Duh. Does that suggest fraud? [01:25:54.080 --> 01:25:55.080] No. [01:25:55.080 --> 01:26:03.080] Next. Greg in California, is that where you're from? [01:26:03.080 --> 01:26:04.080] Yes. [01:26:04.080 --> 01:26:12.080] Yes. Okay. You said it wasn't a fax. Well, boy, you were right on. [01:26:12.080 --> 01:26:36.080] Pfizer and Moderna, before coronavirus came out on the scene and COVID-19 became a plandemic, a scandemic, Pfizer and Moderna were referring to their technologies as mRNA. [01:26:36.080 --> 01:26:46.080] It wasn't until COVID and coronavirus came on the scene that they started misrepresenting it as a vaccine. [01:26:46.080 --> 01:26:58.080] It's not a vaccine. It's an mRNA modality solution therapy. And it's flopped. [01:26:58.080 --> 01:27:01.080] It's gene therapy and it's experimental. [01:27:01.080 --> 01:27:02.080] That's right. [01:27:02.080 --> 01:27:14.080] All of this is experimental. And here's the other thing. When the manufacturing was looked at, they actually tested vials. [01:27:14.080 --> 01:27:24.080] Now, here's an interesting fact. The United States government owns the chemicals. I'm not going to call it a vaccine. They own the chemicals. [01:27:24.080 --> 01:27:33.080] Those chemicals have legal names. The legal names of those chemicals are whatever they have on the bottle, because you can't switch a legal name from one bottle to the other. [01:27:33.080 --> 01:27:51.080] Those chemicals were distributed. There was no consistency in the manufacturing. That's one of the reasons that people in the lot numbers, that's one of the reasons why many people died within hours after taking these vaccines. [01:27:51.080 --> 01:28:01.080] The chemistry, there's no consistency in the chemistry. There's no consistency in the production. There's nothing listed on the package inserts. [01:28:01.080 --> 01:28:07.080] It was a blank piece of paper, and there was no informed consent provided, and nobody's liable for it. [01:28:07.080 --> 01:28:23.080] Okay, hang on. We'll have to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La La Radio. I'm not going to give out the call-in number. We've got three callers and only two segments left. Hang on. We'll be right back. [01:28:23.080 --> 01:28:36.080] Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing. But now researchers say we can add stress to the list. [01:28:36.080 --> 01:28:39.080] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment. [01:29:07.080 --> 01:29:19.080] Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects? If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart. But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain. [01:29:19.080 --> 01:29:27.080] A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons, which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems. [01:29:27.080 --> 01:29:39.080] Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex. That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions. [01:29:39.080 --> 01:29:44.080] So take a deep breath and chill out. It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack. [01:29:44.080 --> 01:29:49.080] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:29:49.080 --> 01:29:59.080] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:29:59.080 --> 01:30:06.080] The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:30:06.080 --> 01:30:09.080] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:30:09.080 --> 01:30:12.080] Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:30:12.080 --> 01:30:13.080] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:30:13.080 --> 01:30:14.080] I'm a structural engineer. [01:30:14.080 --> 01:30:16.080] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:30:16.080 --> 01:30:17.080] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:30:17.080 --> 01:30:18.080] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:30:18.080 --> 01:30:21.080] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:30:21.080 --> 01:30:24.080] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:30:24.080 --> 01:30:28.080] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [01:30:28.080 --> 01:30:31.080] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [01:30:31.080 --> 01:30:36.080] And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [01:30:36.080 --> 01:30:43.080] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [01:30:43.080 --> 01:30:49.080] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [01:30:49.080 --> 01:30:59.080] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [01:30:59.080 --> 01:31:04.080] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today. [01:31:04.080 --> 01:31:11.080] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [01:31:11.080 --> 01:31:14.080] hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. [01:31:14.080 --> 01:31:18.080] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleOfLawRadio.com. [01:31:18.080 --> 01:31:25.080] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:31:25.080 --> 01:31:36.080] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:31:36.080 --> 01:31:43.080] Yeah, who you want to chip? Who you take me for? Free totally. Who you want to chip? I'm not free totally. You can't chip me. [01:31:43.080 --> 01:31:49.080] Don't let them chip you in the morning, chip you in the evening, put a chip in your body. [01:31:49.080 --> 01:31:54.080] And then when you go computer reading, you can't hide me safe from nobody. [01:31:54.080 --> 01:32:04.080] When I say chip in your mom, chip in your daddy, chip in your grandpa and the granny, chip in me, chip in your baby, chip in your family, whole family, [01:32:04.080 --> 01:32:14.080] chip in your dog and the cap around me, chip in the beef and you still go eat it, chip in the fish, them all in the sea, chip in the shark and the whale around me, [01:32:14.080 --> 01:32:20.080] you must be mankind, you can't chip crazy, that's the kind of thing man, they want to read it. [01:32:20.080 --> 01:32:29.080] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, RuleOfLawRadio, and we're talking to John and Greg. [01:32:29.080 --> 01:32:35.080] Okay guys, one more segment because I've got a first time caller that I want to get on before the show is over. [01:32:35.080 --> 01:32:40.080] Okay, got you, here we go, here we go. Here's how you attack them. [01:32:40.080 --> 01:32:46.080] It's not a vaccine and it's a very serious thing that they call it a vaccine when it's not. [01:32:46.080 --> 01:32:55.080] That is a federal law, that's a federal regulation. You attack them there, it's not a vaccine and that's definite misrepresentation. [01:32:55.080 --> 01:33:02.080] The inventor, Robert Malone, he tells the story. Go to Robert Malone, ask him, he'll tell you. [01:33:02.080 --> 01:33:14.080] The FDA, here's another way you attack them, the FDA never okayed the vaccine, they never okayed the mask and they never okayed the PCR test. [01:33:14.080 --> 01:33:23.080] You attack them there. It was emergency use only and when it's emergency use only, that's an experimental thing. [01:33:23.080 --> 01:33:32.080] And they forced people to take it, you're not going to have a job, we're going to throw you out of the club, we're going to fire you. [01:33:32.080 --> 01:33:42.080] They forced people to take it, that's a violation, direct violation of the Nuremberg Code and the Geneva Convention and other federal laws, [01:33:42.080 --> 01:33:49.080] which means they're subject to life in prison or hanging by the neck. [01:33:49.080 --> 01:33:58.080] Now the inserts, he brought up a good point, Greg did, the inserts were blank and that means there's no informed consent. [01:33:58.080 --> 01:34:07.080] Another way to attack them because they broke a federal law, those inserts are supposed to be in there for a reason. [01:34:07.080 --> 01:34:19.080] The test results, the efficacy and the pharmaceutical companies played with the words, they said that the vaccines were 95% effective. [01:34:19.080 --> 01:34:28.080] Effective doesn't mean what you think it means. What the vaccine did not do was confer immunity. [01:34:28.080 --> 01:34:37.080] The vaccines are worthless as far as vaccines go. They do not confer immunity and that's a fact and they admitted it afterwards. [01:34:37.080 --> 01:34:43.080] After the elephant got difficult to hide, they had to admit a lot of these things. [01:34:43.080 --> 01:34:50.080] Now the patents for these vaccines were filed in 2015, 2016 and 2017. [01:34:50.080 --> 01:34:58.080] Remember when I told you the COVID-19 test kits were being distributed in 2017 and 2018? Duh! [01:34:58.080 --> 01:35:02.080] Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that there's fraud there. [01:35:02.080 --> 01:35:10.080] The patents were filed on the vaccines starting as far back as 2015, which means this was all pre-planned. [01:35:10.080 --> 01:35:20.080] This was all pre-scripted and they misrepresented the vaccines at the breaking of federal law. I'll say it again. [01:35:20.080 --> 01:35:30.080] Before COVID ever came, they had the patents filed and Pfizer and Moderna said they were mRNA. [01:35:30.080 --> 01:35:40.080] Until COVID came along, then they started misrepresenting them as vaccines. Now, Randy, Greg, congratulations. You do good work. [01:35:40.080 --> 01:35:52.080] And Randy, I have that case law that you were looking for that I think proves that traffic tickets are not accusatory instruments and it comes right out in the case law. [01:35:52.080 --> 01:36:01.080] And jurisdiction is not conferred over the defendant. And I've got four or five case laws to read to you, but I know time is kind of tight. [01:36:01.080 --> 01:36:07.080] Yeah. Have you emailed that to me? I think you have. I think I saw that. [01:36:07.080 --> 01:36:18.080] I did. And so go grab my email and you'll read yourself. I'm just going to read one. I'm just going to read one quick because I know you've got other calls to go to. [01:36:18.080 --> 01:36:26.080] And Greg, you do your homework and you keep it up. It's guys like you that are going to save America. [01:36:26.080 --> 01:36:53.080] Here we go. Let's see. It is in the matter of Zupacic, I think I'm saying that right, Zupacic and Hoagland, Zupacic, Z-U-P-E-C-I-C, I think is how it's spelled, and Hoagland, H-O-A-G-L-A-N-D. [01:36:53.080 --> 01:37:16.080] It is abundantly clear, of course, that uniform traffic summons and complaint does not fulfill the function of an information and the conviction of a defendant other than upon a verified information gives rise to jurisdictional defects, one indeed that cannot be waived by a guilty plea and is thus a nullity. [01:37:16.080 --> 01:37:20.080] Is this a New York case? [01:37:20.080 --> 01:37:24.080] Yeah, I think they're all New York cases. [01:37:24.080 --> 01:37:48.080] And in a recent case of People versus Gabay, G-A-B-B-A-Y, and it lists the numbers, Supreme Court of New York held that it is well settled that an appearance ticket is not an accusatory instrument and its filing does not confer jurisdiction over a defendant. [01:37:48.080 --> 01:37:54.080] So these, and there's more, I could read them all quickly if you want, but... [01:37:54.080 --> 01:37:55.080] No, don't read them all. [01:37:55.080 --> 01:38:04.080] Must there be a complaint and or information? [01:38:04.080 --> 01:38:06.080] Say that again. [01:38:06.080 --> 01:38:09.080] Must there be a complaint and or information? [01:38:09.080 --> 01:38:13.080] What would be necessary to convey jurisdiction? [01:38:13.080 --> 01:38:25.080] According to what I've, you're the expert on this, but according to what I see, an information is lacking, and that's why this is effective. [01:38:25.080 --> 01:38:41.080] In other words, a traffic ticket, there's one case where it says a uniform, here's People versus Scott, and this is also New York, a uniform traffic ticket is merely a notice to a person to appear. [01:38:41.080 --> 01:38:52.080] Then the case states further, the new uniform traffic ticket does not take the place of an information, but is simply a notice to appear. [01:38:52.080 --> 01:38:57.080] A verified complaint is still necessary. [01:38:57.080 --> 01:39:11.080] So I think the traffic tickets are pooh-pooh, according to these cases. If this is all on the level, then we have a perfect fight against traffic tickets. [01:39:11.080 --> 01:39:16.080] Well, isn't the verified complaint that submitted by the police officer? [01:39:16.080 --> 01:39:21.080] No, a verified complaint? [01:39:21.080 --> 01:39:32.080] Yeah, and then it speaks of an information too. According to what I think I see here, you need an information, and that's done by the DA or the ADA. [01:39:32.080 --> 01:39:41.080] And what he's saying is the traffic citation is not a criminal affidavit. [01:39:41.080 --> 01:39:51.080] In order for the prosecutor to produce an information, there must be a criminal affidavit, a charging instrument. [01:39:51.080 --> 01:39:53.080] Okay. [01:39:53.080 --> 01:40:00.080] The prosecutor cannot be the accuser. That's happening in Texas right now. [01:40:00.080 --> 01:40:15.080] There is no charging instrument in the record, and the prosecutor is the accuser, and Kennedy State says that in order to avoid the obvious evils of the accumulation of power in any one office, [01:40:15.080 --> 01:40:24.080] for the purpose of initiating a criminal prosecution, a prosecuting attorney is not a credible person. [01:40:24.080 --> 01:40:41.080] Okay, I think I got the answer to that right here. According to one case, Shirley v. Schulman, a criminal action must be commenced by the filing of a valid and sufficient accusatory instrument in order for the court to obtain jurisdiction over the matter. [01:40:41.080 --> 01:40:44.080] There you go. [01:40:44.080 --> 01:40:53.080] That's a criminal complaint, not a notice to appear. [01:40:53.080 --> 01:40:59.080] That's what you defined the citation as, is a notice to appear. [01:40:59.080 --> 01:41:04.080] I would think accusatory instrument refers to primary pleadings, an indictment or an information. [01:41:04.080 --> 01:41:08.080] A verified criminal affidavit. [01:41:08.080 --> 01:41:12.080] Criminal complaint. That's an accusatory instrument. [01:41:12.080 --> 01:41:21.080] I have recently even do believe that based on the following that so-and-so did this, that, and the other, and then you swear to it. [01:41:21.080 --> 01:41:28.080] Yes, the courts in California interpret the summons to appear as a criminal complaint. [01:41:28.080 --> 01:41:34.080] That's how they take it, and then they move forward and so it works, just like in Breastcase. [01:41:34.080 --> 01:41:50.080] This was unusual for, you know, he's saying that New York doesn't do it that way, that they have to have an accusatory instrument, but for the traffic courts, that's too inconvenient and costly, so they dispense with it out of hand. [01:41:50.080 --> 01:41:55.080] Good. Okay. I've got to move on. I've got a first-time caller I want to pick up in the next segment. [01:41:55.080 --> 01:41:56.080] Okay. [01:41:56.080 --> 01:42:04.080] Thank you, guys. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain. We live on our radio. We'll be back on the other side. [01:42:04.080 --> 01:42:18.080] We've got a first-time caller from the 806 area, 860 area code. Hang on. Brett, you've got nine seconds to fill in for me. I went out too soon. [01:42:18.080 --> 01:42:20.080] Now you've only got four seconds. [01:42:20.080 --> 01:42:23.080] Oh, I'll tell you all about it. [01:42:23.080 --> 01:42:24.080] Dang, cookies. [01:42:24.080 --> 01:42:26.080] Cookies? Me love cookies. [01:42:26.080 --> 01:42:29.080] Oh, hi, Cookie Munchers. No, these are yucky cookies. [01:42:29.080 --> 01:42:32.080] Cookies? Yucky? No, no bad cookies. [01:42:32.080 --> 01:42:35.080] You can't even eat these cookies. These are cyber cookies. [01:42:35.080 --> 01:42:37.080] No, can't eat it? [01:42:37.080 --> 01:42:40.080] No, they are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer. [01:42:40.080 --> 01:42:41.080] These have apples. [01:42:41.080 --> 01:42:44.080] Really? Oh, that's an actual apple. [01:42:44.080 --> 01:42:46.080] Yummy apple. [01:42:46.080 --> 01:42:56.080] I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash. I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them. [01:42:56.080 --> 01:42:57.080] Bye-bye, yucky cookies. [01:42:57.080 --> 01:43:10.080] Now I go to logosradionetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand side, bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies. [01:43:10.080 --> 01:43:12.080] New cookies? For me? [01:43:12.080 --> 01:43:20.080] Consider it an early Christmas present, and every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network, too. [01:43:20.080 --> 01:43:21.080] Fee is for cookie. [01:43:21.080 --> 01:43:23.080] Fee is for classified. [01:43:23.080 --> 01:43:27.080] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:43:27.080 --> 01:43:38.080] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:43:38.080 --> 01:43:42.080] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:43:42.080 --> 01:43:46.080] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:43:46.080 --> 01:43:51.080] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too. [01:43:51.080 --> 01:43:57.080] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:43:57.080 --> 01:44:06.080] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:44:06.080 --> 01:44:15.080] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [01:44:15.080 --> 01:44:24.080] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:44:24.080 --> 01:44:40.080] Hello? Oh, man, in jail? You got busted? Oh, man, I'm broke, man. [01:44:40.080 --> 01:44:53.080] Some things in this world I will never understand. Some things I realize fully. [01:44:53.080 --> 01:45:02.080] Somebody's gonna police that policeman. Somebody's gonna police the bully. [01:45:02.080 --> 01:45:12.080] There's always a room at the top of the hill. I hear through the grapevine and it's lonely there, too. [01:45:12.080 --> 01:45:20.080] They're wishing it was more than I position the bill. They know that if they don't do it, somebody will. [01:45:20.080 --> 01:45:26.080] Some things in this world I will never understand. Some things I realize fully. [01:45:26.080 --> 01:45:32.080] Okay, we are back, ready to count on Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio, and we lost our first-time caller. [01:45:32.080 --> 01:45:43.080] Greg, Brett's calling to see if we can get him back on. In the meantime, Greg, you got 15 minutes to fill up here. We don't have a caller. [01:45:43.080 --> 01:45:45.080] Oh. [01:45:45.080 --> 01:45:53.080] Tell us something profound and earth-shattering. [01:45:53.080 --> 01:46:06.080] How are we going to sue these guys? How can I? My son got these shots. He's an engineer for Pratt Whitney, and he had to get them for that. [01:46:06.080 --> 01:46:22.080] If something, some bad effect occurs, how do I go after them? And who do I go after? [01:46:22.080 --> 01:46:27.080] Did I lose you, Greg? [01:46:27.080 --> 01:46:30.080] It looks like we lost Greg. [01:46:30.080 --> 01:46:31.080] Okay. [01:46:31.080 --> 01:46:35.080] I'm still here. Hello? [01:46:35.080 --> 01:46:37.080] Yeah, okay. Did you hear my question? [01:46:37.080 --> 01:46:45.080] I did. How are we going to go after them? We have to go after them like they're going after us. [01:46:45.080 --> 01:46:55.080] I think we need to go after them with every aspect that we see, but that complicates the suits, right, because what are your causes of action? [01:46:55.080 --> 01:47:08.080] Well, we certainly have fraud as one. We have coercion as one. These are areas of law I've never studied. [01:47:08.080 --> 01:47:13.080] What about the criminal side? [01:47:13.080 --> 01:47:24.080] I almost looked at this as aggravated assault. They assaulted me with a weapon. [01:47:24.080 --> 01:47:31.080] They're going to rephrase the argument that it was for the protection of U.S. citizens, but the assault was in the beginning. [01:47:31.080 --> 01:47:41.080] The assault was with the, like Dr. David Martin talks about, the assault was the creation of the, it's the chimeric research in the beginning. [01:47:41.080 --> 01:47:46.080] That was the assault. There was a plan. There was a... [01:47:46.080 --> 01:47:51.080] No, the assault was when they stuck the needle in you. [01:47:51.080 --> 01:47:53.080] Well, that's the physical assault, but the... [01:47:53.080 --> 01:47:57.080] That's what we can adjudicate. [01:47:57.080 --> 01:47:59.080] I didn't let them stick the needle in me. [01:47:59.080 --> 01:48:09.080] If he stuck the needle in me and injected something that could cause serious bodily injury or death, [01:48:09.080 --> 01:48:26.080] and he knew that it could cause serious bodily injury or death, and did not give me adequate notice that it could cause serious bodily injury or death, that's aggravated assault. [01:48:26.080 --> 01:48:32.080] Okay. Well, so then legally, they couldn't have known that it was going to cause anybody... [01:48:32.080 --> 01:48:41.080] Like, for instance, who gave you the shot? All right, you went to Kaiser or you went to some medical group. Did they know? No, they didn't know. They believed what they... [01:48:41.080 --> 01:48:47.080] It doesn't matter that they didn't know. They had to know. [01:48:47.080 --> 01:48:54.080] They don't get to say, I didn't know. No, you're the one that stuck the needle in there. You have a duty to know. [01:48:54.080 --> 01:49:04.080] Oh, I didn't know that it had strychnine in it. Oh, you mean strychnine will hurt you? I didn't know that. No, that doesn't matter. [01:49:04.080 --> 01:49:12.080] The guy who stuck the needle in had a duty to be certain of what he was injecting. [01:49:12.080 --> 01:49:22.080] And if he knew it was dangerous, he had to tell you first, not give you a blank information page. [01:49:22.080 --> 01:49:32.080] Randy, do you know that they passed a law in 2023, January 2023, in California that says doctors are not allowed to give informed consent? [01:49:32.080 --> 01:49:41.080] I mean, obviously, that can be challenged in court, right? But doctors in the state of California are not allowed to give informed consent if it goes against the consensus. [01:49:41.080 --> 01:49:51.080] We're in consensus science now. We're no longer in evidentiary science or evidence-based medicine. We're now in consensus medicine. [01:49:51.080 --> 01:50:02.080] You have to ask your doctor, right? You're in California. California is certifiably insane. [01:50:02.080 --> 01:50:17.080] Well, not me. And Texas isn't. Look at what Brett's going through. [01:50:17.080 --> 01:50:22.080] Texas has problems, but it's not institutionalized problems. [01:50:22.080 --> 01:50:24.080] Apparently it is. [01:50:24.080 --> 01:50:30.080] Well, it's done everywhere, but it's not legal. [01:50:30.080 --> 01:50:32.080] They don't even go here either. [01:50:32.080 --> 01:50:41.080] There's not even a pretense of legality. It's just what they do, and they feel like they can do it because everybody's criminal. [01:50:41.080 --> 01:50:48.080] This is what I'm fighting with, the mass incarceration issue. [01:50:48.080 --> 01:50:55.080] I have a friend of mine, they just arrested, and they're in jail. They're going to magistrate the next day. [01:50:55.080 --> 01:51:03.080] But before the magistrate came to the court, I talked to her in her office and told her, [01:51:03.080 --> 01:51:11.080] you're going to go over to the sheriff's department and you're going to do this magistration. You are commanded by statute to hold an examining trial. [01:51:11.080 --> 01:51:18.080] And when you don't do that, when you give the records back to the sheriff instead of sending them to the clerk of the court, [01:51:18.080 --> 01:51:26.080] I'm going to come back by here and I'm going to give you criminal charges against the sheriff for accepting those records. [01:51:26.080 --> 01:51:31.080] And I'm going to command you to issue a warrant. She said, well, I won't be issuing a warrant. [01:51:31.080 --> 01:51:39.080] I said, I know that. And then I'll file criminal charges against you, and then I'll get to sue you personally. [01:51:39.080 --> 01:51:44.080] And I will sue you personally. I'll use the suit I found in Victoria County. [01:51:44.080 --> 01:51:52.080] She said, well, we all have to do what we have to do. [01:51:52.080 --> 01:51:59.080] She felt like she would be absolutely protected. [01:51:59.080 --> 01:52:03.080] I am going to visit a legal onslaught on her. [01:52:03.080 --> 01:52:09.080] But I got permission because my son-in-law is a JP in the county. [01:52:09.080 --> 01:52:16.080] And when I was arrested, he was supposed to do the morning arraignment, but he couldn't because I'm his father-in-law. [01:52:16.080 --> 01:52:20.080] So he had asked a friend of his, JP, to do it. [01:52:20.080 --> 01:52:29.080] And he told me if I sued her for doing that, he would never speak to me again as long as he lived. [01:52:29.080 --> 01:52:36.080] So I went to him about Janice Morrow. She's JP1. [01:52:36.080 --> 01:52:43.080] What about Janice? Can I sue her? Oh, knock yourself out. Everybody hates her. [01:52:43.080 --> 01:52:51.080] So I'm going to go lower her. But she doesn't care. She thinks she'll be protected no matter what. [01:52:51.080 --> 01:52:56.080] I've asked the district attorney to arrest her several times over the years. [01:52:56.080 --> 01:53:05.080] And I never got her arrested because everybody's protecting everybody. I wasn't ready yet. This time I'm ready. [01:53:05.080 --> 01:53:12.080] What you're talking about is institutionalized all over the country. It's not just California. [01:53:12.080 --> 01:53:16.080] But what they're doing is still illegal. [01:53:16.080 --> 01:53:24.080] They say it in California. They codify it and say, we get to do whatever we want. So says me. [01:53:24.080 --> 01:53:37.080] It's legal. Tina calls in. Lawyers stood in court, looked her right in the eye, and lied like a dog over a material issue. [01:53:37.080 --> 01:53:48.080] Based on his lie, she dropped an issue. She wanted the original loan instrument. [01:53:48.080 --> 01:53:53.080] He said, oh, yeah, we have it. We'll give it to you if you will drop this issue. [01:53:53.080 --> 01:53:56.080] And so she dropped the issue. And then he said, no, we're not going to give it to you. [01:53:56.080 --> 01:54:01.080] And then he argued that you should have known I was lying at the time. [01:54:01.080 --> 01:54:10.080] And the court said, the lawyer can lie like a dog. It's the attorney privilege. He can do that. It's OK. [01:54:10.080 --> 01:54:14.080] It's not the attorney privilege. Yeah, no way. [01:54:14.080 --> 01:54:18.080] It's California. They're insane. [01:54:18.080 --> 01:54:22.080] But they're lying the same way in Texas. Look at Brett's case. [01:54:22.080 --> 01:54:30.080] Yeah, but it's not legal in Texas. It is legal in California. [01:54:30.080 --> 01:54:34.080] That was the problem. That's why you want to move out in California. [01:54:34.080 --> 01:54:40.080] Tina has been all over him. She sued them for that specifically. [01:54:40.080 --> 01:54:46.080] And the courts just tossed it so they can lie all they want to. [01:54:46.080 --> 01:54:49.080] That's insane. You need to talk to Tina. [01:54:49.080 --> 01:54:58.080] She filed suit against them for lying. And they told her, the lawyers did, you should have known I was lying at the time. [01:54:58.080 --> 01:55:00.080] So you're responsible. [01:55:00.080 --> 01:55:05.080] Isn't that when the courts were telling her that those were frivolous suits or that she was, what did they call her? [01:55:05.080 --> 01:55:07.080] They called her a vexatious litigant. [01:55:07.080 --> 01:55:12.080] No, no, no. They didn't call her a vexatious litigant. They said this was res judicata. [01:55:12.080 --> 01:55:23.080] That's all they could say. Just keep chanting res judicata, meaning it's already been decided, even though the issues that she was bringing had never been before the court. [01:55:23.080 --> 01:55:29.080] And they just kept saying that as if it was true. [01:55:29.080 --> 01:55:35.080] You know, everybody that calls into the show said, oh, my county's the worst county in the nation. [01:55:35.080 --> 01:55:41.080] I said, no. They say their state's the worst state. No, California's. [01:55:41.080 --> 01:55:46.080] Michigan's pretty bad. New York's pretty bad. But I think maybe California might be the worst. [01:55:46.080 --> 01:55:50.080] But at least they have laws that what they're doing is illegal. [01:55:50.080 --> 01:55:55.080] Now, it's hard to get it enforced, but in California, it's legal. [01:55:55.080 --> 01:56:05.080] Yeah. I'll tell you, I'm back to the position of this, that you can pass all the laws you want, but you haven't proven. [01:56:05.080 --> 01:56:11.080] You fall back on the idea of jurisdiction. [01:56:11.080 --> 01:56:20.080] I don't think the state has any jurisdiction. They have a territorial boundary, but their laws apply to government and to the people they're in a nexus with. [01:56:20.080 --> 01:56:26.080] They're never in a nexus with the people that live in the state. We're the people who are in the state. [01:56:26.080 --> 01:56:31.080] That's patriot stuff. Yeah, they are. Ordinances are that way. [01:56:31.080 --> 01:56:42.080] They only apply to someone in a nexus with them, but not statutes. Statutes are gauged by constantly the legislators. [01:56:42.080 --> 01:56:48.080] Hang on. We are out of time. We'll be back tomorrow night for our four-hour info marathon. [01:56:48.080 --> 01:56:56.080] And thank you, Greg, and thank you for hanging in there with us when we ran out of callers so we didn't have to come up with content. [01:56:56.080 --> 01:57:01.080] Okay, we'll be back tomorrow night with our four-hour info marathon. [01:57:01.080 --> 01:57:05.080] Thank you all for listening, and good night. [01:57:05.080 --> 01:57:10.080] Except you've got seven seconds, Brett, to say something that's sidewalk. [01:57:10.080 --> 01:57:13.080] Too late. Seven whole seconds. [01:57:13.080 --> 01:57:21.080] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:57:21.080 --> 01:57:31.080] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:57:31.080 --> 01:57:43.080] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:57:43.080 --> 01:57:53.080] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:57:53.080 --> 01:57:55.080] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:57:55.080 --> 01:58:03.080] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:58:03.080 --> 01:58:12.080] That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:58:12.080 --> 01:58:22.080] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.