[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.500 --> 00:09.500]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.500 --> 00:11.000]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:11.000 --> 00:16.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.500 --> 00:18.500]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.500 --> 00:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:26.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.500 --> 00:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:34.500]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.500 --> 00:38.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[00:38.000 --> 00:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.000 --> 00:45.500]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:45.500 --> 00:47.500]  Spar, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.500 --> 00:51.000]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.000 --> 00:54.000]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.000 --> 01:02.500]  Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:02.500 --> 01:08.000]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion.
[01:08.000 --> 01:10.500]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.500 --> 01:14.000]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.000 --> 01:17.000]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government,
[01:17.000 --> 01:21.000]  we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:21.000 --> 01:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.000 --> 01:34.500]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.500 --> 01:38.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.000 --> 01:39.500]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.500 --> 01:46.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.000 --> 01:48.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.000 --> 01:51.500]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.500 --> 01:56.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:56.500 --> 01:58.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:58.000 --> 02:01.500]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.500 --> 02:04.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.000 --> 02:08.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[02:08.000 --> 02:12.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.000 --> 02:15.500]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.500 --> 02:22.000]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.000 --> 02:26.000]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms,
[02:26.000 --> 02:30.000]  arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.000 --> 02:31.000]  Get it?
[02:31.000 --> 02:33.500]  Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:33.500 --> 02:38.500]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well when he said,
[02:38.500 --> 02:45.500]  the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny,
[02:45.500 --> 02:51.000]  which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[02:51.000 --> 03:09.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:21.000 --> 03:27.000]  Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do?
[03:27.000 --> 03:33.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:33.000 --> 03:39.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:39.000 --> 03:44.000]  When you were eight and you had bad dreams, you'd go to school and learn the golden rules.
[03:44.000 --> 03:47.000]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[03:47.000 --> 03:53.000]  Because if you get high and you must get crew, bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do,
[03:53.000 --> 03:55.000]  whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:55.000 --> 04:01.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:01.000 --> 04:04.000]  You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one.
[04:04.000 --> 04:06.500]  You chuck it on your mother, and you tuck it on your father.
[04:06.500 --> 04:09.000]  You chuck it on your brother, and you chuck it on your sister.
[04:09.000 --> 04:12.000]  You chuck it on that one, and your daddy's on me.
[04:12.000 --> 04:19.900]  Bad Boys what you gonna do? what you gonna do when they come for you?
[04:19.900 --> 04:28.220]  Bad Boys, Bad Boys, What you gonna do when they come for you?
[04:28.220 --> 04:33.080]  Bad Boys What you gonna do? what you gonna do when they come for you?
[04:33.080 --> 04:46.080]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Rhett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this Friday, the 16th
[04:46.080 --> 04:50.080]  day of December, 2022.
[04:50.080 --> 04:53.800]  And I am going to turn on the phones.
[04:53.800 --> 04:58.120]  So if you have a question or a comment, give us a call.
[04:58.120 --> 05:05.560]  Our call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[05:05.560 --> 05:14.280]  And I spent a lot of time last night, if you listened last night, talking about the plan
[05:14.280 --> 05:24.240]  that I've put together over the last 40 years or so to at least fix a part of the criminal
[05:24.240 --> 05:27.320]  justice system here in Texas.
[05:27.320 --> 05:33.920]  What I see happening in Texas, I see happening everywhere else.
[05:33.920 --> 05:37.400]  About 40 years ago, they stopped doing examining trials.
[05:37.400 --> 05:42.120]  I don't know why they did it in other states, but I have figured out why they did it in
[05:42.120 --> 05:44.760]  Texas.
[05:44.760 --> 05:48.440]  And it's just wrong.
[05:48.440 --> 05:49.440]  It's a horrible mess.
[05:49.440 --> 05:57.720]  Actually, it was about almost 50 years ago that this started in Texas.
[05:57.720 --> 06:02.760]  And I pretty well got figured out what it is, and it all goes down to proper examining
[06:02.760 --> 06:03.760]  trial.
[06:03.760 --> 06:10.080]  You get arrested in any state at the moment, they'll take you directly to jail.
[06:10.080 --> 06:12.400]  That was never intended.
[06:12.400 --> 06:20.240]  It was intended that if a sheriff or a policeman arrests a freeman for any reason, he is to
[06:20.240 --> 06:26.440]  take that person directly to the nearest magistrate and get permission from the magistrate to
[06:26.440 --> 06:28.240]  take them to jail.
[06:28.240 --> 06:33.240]  There's no authority to do that on their own.
[06:33.240 --> 06:46.880]  And a subordinate clause appeared in a statute in 1974 and screwed everything up.
[06:46.880 --> 06:52.040]  But if you listened last night, I spent a couple of segments last night on this.
[06:52.040 --> 06:53.480]  I won't do it again tonight.
[06:53.480 --> 06:55.800]  We do have a couple of callers on the board.
[06:55.800 --> 06:57.920]  I'll go ahead and go to the callers.
[06:57.920 --> 07:01.040]  We have Kurt in Washington.
[07:01.040 --> 07:03.080]  Hello, Kurt.
[07:03.080 --> 07:05.280]  What do you have for us today?
[07:05.280 --> 07:07.680]  Oh, well, hey, Randy.
[07:07.680 --> 07:12.360]  I was just calling in because I saw you were whining about not having enough callers yesterday.
[07:12.360 --> 07:16.160]  Oh, I was whining about it.
[07:16.160 --> 07:21.440]  I mean, that is one way of putting it.
[07:21.440 --> 07:24.240]  You could call it something else.
[07:24.240 --> 07:27.080]  I can't think of another good adjective at the moment.
[07:27.080 --> 07:28.560]  A little cheese with that?
[07:28.560 --> 07:31.440]  Yeah, a little cheese to go with my wine.
[07:31.440 --> 07:33.280]  It was surprising.
[07:33.280 --> 07:34.760]  It wasn't a problem.
[07:34.760 --> 07:37.440]  I've got plenty of content.
[07:37.440 --> 07:42.480]  It's just that we have been, it was packed at every show and then all of a sudden we've
[07:42.480 --> 07:44.880]  got two calls all night.
[07:44.880 --> 07:47.720]  And one of them is John.
[07:47.720 --> 07:48.720]  You know how John is.
[07:48.720 --> 07:49.720]  From California?
[07:49.720 --> 07:50.720]  From New York.
[07:50.720 --> 07:51.720]  Oh, from New York.
[07:51.720 --> 07:52.720]  John.
[07:52.720 --> 07:53.720]  I don't know.
[07:53.720 --> 07:54.720]  I'm not sure if I know John.
[07:54.720 --> 07:55.720]  Oh, he's good.
[07:55.720 --> 07:58.600]  He takes my abuse well.
[07:58.600 --> 08:02.480]  And that's good because I hand it out well.
[08:02.480 --> 08:03.480]  And it's okay.
[08:03.480 --> 08:07.600]  I have my Legal 101 up.
[08:07.600 --> 08:13.520]  And we haven't went through the routine in a long time, through the basics.
[08:13.520 --> 08:17.840]  So I'll try to run the show for the first two hours if we don't have a bunch of callers.
[08:17.840 --> 08:26.760]  Then I may at the third hour go to a brief of Legal 101.
[08:26.760 --> 08:33.200]  Kind of an overview of how the legal system really works as opposed to that crap they
[08:33.200 --> 08:35.680]  teach you in high school.
[08:35.680 --> 08:36.680]  Okay.
[08:36.680 --> 08:37.680]  Is that all?
[08:37.680 --> 08:40.640]  Did you just call to accuse me of whining?
[08:40.640 --> 08:41.640]  No.
[08:41.640 --> 08:42.640]  No.
[08:42.640 --> 08:43.640]  Okay.
[08:43.640 --> 08:48.640]  Ask us something interesting, insightful.
[08:48.640 --> 09:02.800]  No, I've heard that you're really good at getting under opposing attorney's skin.
[09:02.800 --> 09:08.600]  And I've got the situation where I've got a lawsuit going against my son's mom and
[09:08.600 --> 09:15.920]  her family attorney and her fiance and one of their friends because they stole my kid
[09:15.920 --> 09:22.840]  and stole my car and tried to steal my house starting in September of 2021.
[09:22.840 --> 09:30.720]  And so, you know, I had tried to resolve things diplomatically by emails, but of course that
[09:30.720 --> 09:34.840]  didn't work because they're liars.
[09:34.840 --> 09:47.280]  And so, my causes of action in this are baritory and abusive process and coercion and slander
[09:47.280 --> 09:54.120]  because they falsely initiated the family court case, that's the baritory.
[09:54.120 --> 10:01.480]  And then they had a superior motive for, you know, basically kidnapping my kid and using
[10:01.480 --> 10:06.720]  them as an extortion tool and stealing my car and so that's where the coercion comes
[10:06.720 --> 10:15.600]  in because there was, over the last year, there was attempts to dangle, oh, you can
[10:15.600 --> 10:20.880]  have your son back a few days a month as long as you, you know, give us money for this or
[10:20.880 --> 10:21.880]  that, you know.
[10:21.880 --> 10:25.680]  Oh, you can have your car back if you give us money.
[10:25.680 --> 10:31.720]  So, my son's mom got an attorney and her family attorney got an attorney and I'm still
[10:31.720 --> 10:36.320]  relishing the fact that an attorney had to hire an attorney.
[10:36.320 --> 10:37.320]  And their initial...
[10:37.320 --> 10:40.480]  Yeah, that is kind of fun, right?
[10:40.480 --> 10:42.920]  Have you hammered their attorney?
[10:42.920 --> 10:48.480]  Well, I've only done three bar grievances against the family attorney, but I have more
[10:48.480 --> 10:49.480]  grievances.
[10:49.480 --> 10:50.480]  What?
[10:50.480 --> 10:51.480]  What?
[10:51.480 --> 10:52.480]  Have you been asleep?
[10:52.480 --> 10:53.480]  Slacker.
[10:53.480 --> 10:58.480]  I mean, just so you know, like, I'm too nice, right?
[10:58.480 --> 11:00.560]  I haven't learned your methods yet.
[11:00.560 --> 11:01.560]  I'm too nice, right?
[11:01.560 --> 11:06.600]  So, when I was going to do the first bar grievance, I emailed him and I said, hey, I have reason
[11:06.600 --> 11:09.600]  to believe and do believe that you've committed these crimes and I wanted to give you the
[11:09.600 --> 11:14.160]  opportunity to, you know, amend your false statements in court and, you know, correct
[11:14.160 --> 11:16.760]  things because I'm trying to be nice here.
[11:16.760 --> 11:19.480]  And he didn't, you know, he just blew me off.
[11:19.480 --> 11:20.480]  Okay.
[11:20.480 --> 11:21.480]  Okay.
[11:21.480 --> 11:26.200]  I have to do the illegal 101.
[11:26.200 --> 11:28.280]  You just broke a major rule.
[11:28.280 --> 11:29.280]  Uh-oh.
[11:29.280 --> 11:33.200]  Well, I'm going to tell him he knows it.
[11:33.200 --> 11:38.200]  The major rule is never give fair warning.
[11:38.200 --> 11:42.040]  They will always do what they just did.
[11:42.040 --> 11:46.400]  They will always treat it as a threat.
[11:46.400 --> 11:51.920]  It's much, much more effective if you just do it.
[11:51.920 --> 11:54.960]  File aggravated perjury charges against them.
[11:54.960 --> 11:56.880]  The courts are not going to do anything with it.
[11:56.880 --> 12:00.160]  This is a family law case and the courts are going to look at it and say, ah, these are
[12:00.160 --> 12:02.640]  just families mad at each other.
[12:02.640 --> 12:03.640]  They're just lashing out.
[12:03.640 --> 12:06.320]  They won't do anything with it.
[12:06.320 --> 12:11.120]  But you know that and I know that and the court knows that.
[12:11.120 --> 12:14.600]  But the wife and her boyfriend don't know that.
[12:14.600 --> 12:18.360]  You will cause a bit of anal restriction.
[12:18.360 --> 12:19.360]  Right.
[12:19.360 --> 12:25.600]  And if they, if they know you won't give fair warning, you'll just land on them.
[12:25.600 --> 12:30.600]  It'll help keep them from acting ignorant in the future.
[12:30.600 --> 12:34.520]  Well, you're actually, you've been nice to them.
[12:34.520 --> 12:35.520]  They just don't realize it.
[12:35.520 --> 12:40.000]  It's kind of like my dad beat me with the belt and told me this hurt him a whole lot
[12:40.000 --> 12:43.320]  more than they hurt, than it hurt me.
[12:43.320 --> 12:45.320]  I didn't find that crap a lot.
[12:45.320 --> 12:48.320]  You believe that, right?
[12:48.320 --> 12:52.520]  Anyway, go ahead, Kurt.
[12:52.520 --> 13:00.360]  So I agree with your strategy overall, but I think there's a use for forthrightness initially
[13:00.360 --> 13:08.440]  in emails to attorneys and what I wanted to do over hundreds of emails was establish a
[13:08.440 --> 13:14.160]  written record that I was always trying to, you know, that I was informing them of what
[13:14.160 --> 13:19.040]  was going on, that I was giving them an opportunity because I knew that, you know, months later
[13:19.040 --> 13:27.840]  and now we're at that point, months later, he would be, you know, a whiny little BIPC
[13:27.840 --> 13:30.400]  and that he would be trying to use this stuff against me.
[13:30.400 --> 13:33.800]  And so now that we're not, you know, we're not in the family court saying we're in my
[13:33.800 --> 13:38.880]  lawsuit, now, you know, he literally complained to the judge.
[13:38.880 --> 13:43.120]  Wait a minute, wait a minute, I think we are not up to speed.
[13:43.120 --> 13:47.120]  You're not in the family courts anymore, you're in the lawsuit.
[13:47.120 --> 13:48.120]  What does that mean?
[13:48.120 --> 13:51.880]  I'm suing them in Superior Court.
[13:51.880 --> 13:56.280]  So you're in the family court and I take it was a divorce case?
[13:56.280 --> 14:03.680]  No, we were never married and that was part of the insanity was I found the statute that
[14:03.680 --> 14:10.680]  clearly states that, you know, all these temporary and permanent parenting plans and orders,
[14:10.680 --> 14:16.320]  they only apply to people who have been married, divorced in a state-recognized domestic partnership
[14:16.320 --> 14:17.840]  or annulment.
[14:17.840 --> 14:25.040]  And so when I tried to point out that they didn't actually have subject matter jurisdiction,
[14:25.040 --> 14:27.040]  everybody got really pissed off.
[14:27.040 --> 14:31.600]  Oh, you felt bad about it.
[14:31.600 --> 14:39.560]  I would take that as a really good sign.
[14:39.560 --> 14:43.320]  So did you bring this in for them?
[14:43.320 --> 14:49.960]  They got so mad that they just started doing ridiculous things like, you know, I don't
[14:49.960 --> 14:55.160]  know what your state is, but Federal Rule of Civil Procedure number four covers service
[14:55.160 --> 14:56.160]  of process.
[14:56.160 --> 15:02.160]  It's CR4 here in Washington and, you know, you can have anybody that's not a party to
[15:02.160 --> 15:08.440]  the case that's 18 years of age or older act as legal service of process provided that
[15:08.440 --> 15:10.160]  they're not being paid for it.
[15:10.160 --> 15:16.480]  If somebody is being paid for service process, they have to actually be licensed by the state.
[15:16.480 --> 15:22.840]  And so I was just having my friends act as service of process for all these actions I've
[15:22.840 --> 15:30.040]  been doing, and they didn't, my son's mom and her fiance, who's another woman actually,
[15:30.040 --> 15:31.280]  they really didn't like that.
[15:31.280 --> 15:33.880]  Like it really got under their skin.
[15:33.880 --> 15:41.680]  And so they had the family attorney go to the family judge with a motion that the only
[15:41.680 --> 15:51.000]  people I could have serve process at my kid's mom's house was either ABC process servers
[15:51.000 --> 15:54.680]  or this other one like Unicorn something.
[15:54.680 --> 16:00.440]  So basically the judge was asserting that, you know, he was issuing this order that goes
[16:00.440 --> 16:08.560]  to the cops that if anybody else besides those two process server agencies serves process
[16:08.560 --> 16:09.560]  that I'm to be arrested.
[16:09.560 --> 16:10.560]  Right.
[16:10.560 --> 16:11.560]  So if I had the-
[16:11.560 --> 16:15.640]  Did you file criminal charges against the judge?
[16:15.640 --> 16:18.160]  Oh, I've filed-
[16:18.160 --> 16:21.240]  In Texas, that would be official oppression.
[16:21.240 --> 16:22.240]  Right.
[16:22.240 --> 16:25.560]  It's also impairing the obligations of contracts.
[16:25.560 --> 16:31.040]  No, you can't contract with them because you can't pay them.
[16:31.040 --> 16:37.160]  Well, if you do hire somebody, then they end up not being able to do the service.
[16:37.160 --> 16:43.200]  So if you hire a different process server, that would work a flip.
[16:43.200 --> 16:46.760]  Where does the judge get specific authority?
[16:46.760 --> 16:47.760]  Did they claim-
[16:47.760 --> 16:48.760]  Hold on just a second.
[16:48.760 --> 16:55.480]  Before- we're going to have Randy run off the cliff here in just a second, but first
[16:55.480 --> 17:00.360]  let's go to our sponsor.
[17:00.360 --> 17:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[17:05.000 --> 17:09.160]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears' proven method.
[17:09.160 --> 17:13.440]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[17:13.440 --> 17:14.440]  can win too.
[17:14.440 --> 17:19.360]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[17:19.360 --> 17:25.160]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[17:25.160 --> 17:29.720]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[17:29.720 --> 17:33.920]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.920 --> 17:39.040]  The Michael Mears' proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:39.040 --> 17:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[17:41.000 --> 17:46.680]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[17:46.680 --> 17:49.640]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[17:49.640 --> 17:59.160]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[17:59.160 --> 18:00.160]  collectors now.
[18:00.160 --> 18:04.720]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[18:04.720 --> 18:07.120]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[18:07.120 --> 18:11.160]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to
[18:11.160 --> 18:12.520]  stand and defend our own rights.
[18:12.520 --> 18:15.720]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[18:15.720 --> 18:19.360]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[18:19.360 --> 18:23.600]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[18:23.600 --> 18:25.080]  our rights through due process.
[18:25.080 --> 18:28.960]  Former Sheriff's Deputy A. Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[18:28.960 --> 18:32.740]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[18:32.740 --> 18:34.840]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[18:34.840 --> 18:39.160]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[18:39.160 --> 18:40.160]  ordering your copy today.
[18:40.160 --> 18:43.840]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[18:43.840 --> 18:48.240]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[18:48.240 --> 18:50.560]  documents, and other useful resource material.
[18:50.560 --> 18:54.520]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:54.520 --> 18:58.720]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[18:58.720 --> 19:08.480]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:28.720 --> 19:49.080]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[19:49.080 --> 19:51.960]  And there's one thing I was trying to get you to before the break.
[19:51.960 --> 19:57.560]  I was assuming that the judge was not acting from good cause.
[19:57.560 --> 20:08.160]  Did the opposing party allege that your unpaid process servers did something illegal or improper?
[20:08.160 --> 20:12.160]  Oh, no, of course not.
[20:12.160 --> 20:19.520]  And in fact, the fiancé of my kid's mom, she actually grabbed an aluminum baseball bat
[20:19.520 --> 20:24.320]  and followed one of my friends out to their van.
[20:24.320 --> 20:29.600]  Did your friend file a simple assault?
[20:29.600 --> 20:37.480]  Well, so Randy, this is how comical my life is here in Seattle, because they threatened
[20:37.480 --> 20:38.680]  another process server.
[20:38.680 --> 20:44.400]  So I went with both of my friends who'd been threatened, and I looked up and printed out
[20:44.400 --> 20:51.120]  the state statutes regarding threatening a process server and it's a class B felony.
[20:51.120 --> 20:58.040]  And we went to the police precinct, because they just opened back up here recently, finally.
[20:58.040 --> 21:01.640]  And we tried to explain it.
[21:01.640 --> 21:10.880]  And when they saw it was me, they accused me of harassing my son's mom.
[21:10.880 --> 21:16.720]  And like the death sergeant didn't want to hear any, she's like, we should just leave
[21:16.720 --> 21:17.720]  her alone.
[21:17.720 --> 21:18.720]  Right?
[21:18.720 --> 21:26.680]  So, because it's me, the police won't take any complaint from me.
[21:26.680 --> 21:39.560]  Never take a complaint to a policeman, take them to a magistrate, any magistrate, Chief
[21:39.560 --> 21:42.560]  Justice of the Washington Supreme.
[21:42.560 --> 21:49.400]  Well, no, that's the thing is the entire Washington state court system is still preventing
[21:49.400 --> 21:54.720]  me from going anywhere without a mask.
[21:54.720 --> 21:57.600]  Like I can't, I can't go to a court room.
[21:57.600 --> 22:00.280]  Different issue.
[22:00.280 --> 22:07.520]  That's Washington state, that's the blue side.
[22:07.520 --> 22:16.920]  If the, your wife and her husband or her boyfriend, whatever, threatened a process server, file
[22:16.920 --> 22:22.720]  that with a magistrate, unless Washington is totally different than everywhere else.
[22:22.720 --> 22:29.480]  There's nothing in any state law that I've ever seen that directs a criminal complaint
[22:29.480 --> 22:31.360]  to a police officer.
[22:31.360 --> 22:32.360]  Nothing.
[22:32.360 --> 22:39.280]  They do have a duty if they find out about crime, but they need to act on that.
[22:39.280 --> 22:46.240]  But they, the code always points you to go to a magistrate with your criminal complaint.
[22:46.240 --> 22:54.600]  And like in Texas, Article 2.13, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure says 2.3 paragraph C,
[22:54.600 --> 23:00.920]  if a policeman hasn't made known to him that a crime has been committed, he shall give
[23:00.920 --> 23:03.360]  notice to some magistrate.
[23:03.360 --> 23:11.760]  Well, yeah, I mean, trust me, like I've cited the law to the cops, to the county sheriff,
[23:11.760 --> 23:13.080]  like you know, I know the statute.
[23:13.080 --> 23:14.560]  Well, that doesn't do any good.
[23:14.560 --> 23:15.560]  Telling them.
[23:15.560 --> 23:16.960]  That whole process, right?
[23:16.960 --> 23:24.360]  And you know, that's exactly why this, Randy has this routine that he talks about is because
[23:24.360 --> 23:27.240]  it does no good to tell them about their duties.
[23:27.240 --> 23:29.240]  They're not going to learn it from you.
[23:29.240 --> 23:31.120]  They're not going to listen to you.
[23:31.120 --> 23:34.920]  They're busy doing their protocol.
[23:34.920 --> 23:41.720]  So if you're going to talk to a policeman, you talk to him by first handing him a verified
[23:41.720 --> 23:43.200]  criminal affidavit.
[23:43.200 --> 23:46.520]  Here, I have this for you.
[23:46.520 --> 23:50.600]  And once he's touched it, he just got stuck to it.
[23:50.600 --> 23:57.440]  I had one in Stephenville, wouldn't take a complaint from me against the county attorney.
[23:57.440 --> 24:01.040]  So he wanted me to fill out this voluntary statement.
[24:01.040 --> 24:02.040]  So I did.
[24:02.040 --> 24:06.840]  I handed it back to him, and he's looking at it, and he realizes there's something behind
[24:06.840 --> 24:07.840]  it.
[24:07.840 --> 24:11.720]  He pulls the top sheet off, and there's a verified criminal affidavit.
[24:11.720 --> 24:12.720]  What is this?
[24:12.720 --> 24:15.120]  I told him, that's a verified criminal affidavit.
[24:15.120 --> 24:16.920]  I've given you notice to the crimes review committee.
[24:16.920 --> 24:18.400]  Well, I'm not going to take this.
[24:18.400 --> 24:19.880]  Sorry, Bubba.
[24:19.880 --> 24:21.240]  You already touched it.
[24:21.240 --> 24:22.240]  You stuck to it.
[24:22.240 --> 24:23.240]  Wow.
[24:23.240 --> 24:25.360]  I'm just going to throw it in the trash.
[24:25.360 --> 24:28.840]  I really don't care what you do.
[24:28.840 --> 24:31.040]  That's how you do that.
[24:31.040 --> 24:35.920]  Do not expect public officials to do their jobs.
[24:35.920 --> 24:43.480]  But in their defense, they get people coming in PO'd all the time, especially family law
[24:43.480 --> 24:45.180]  for policemen.
[24:45.180 --> 24:48.920]  That is the most dangerous thing they ever get involved in, because people are crazy
[24:48.920 --> 24:51.240]  in family law.
[24:51.240 --> 25:00.600]  And they spend their time trying to get people away from each other's throats.
[25:00.600 --> 25:08.400]  So they have their side, and you have your side, but in realizing that, there are ways
[25:08.400 --> 25:09.400]  of handling it.
[25:09.400 --> 25:11.920]  And my suggestion is stay away from the police.
[25:11.920 --> 25:13.640]  They're a waste of time.
[25:13.640 --> 25:18.440]  You go to the police and talk to them, and they will make up a statement and lie like
[25:18.440 --> 25:19.440]  dogs.
[25:19.440 --> 25:20.440]  Right.
[25:20.440 --> 25:22.880]  Because they know they can't.
[25:22.880 --> 25:29.280]  And the judges have literally said, I'm not even going to look at this.
[25:29.280 --> 25:30.280]  You need to go.
[25:30.280 --> 25:31.280]  Good.
[25:31.280 --> 25:32.280]  Sue the judge personally.
[25:32.280 --> 25:40.640]  Send him a tort letter, notice of intent to sue in your personal capacity, and make
[25:40.640 --> 25:41.640]  up a little suit.
[25:41.640 --> 25:43.640]  It's real simple.
[25:43.640 --> 25:54.040]  You invoke the duty of the judge, and see where in Washington law are judges declared
[25:54.040 --> 26:00.440]  to be magistrates, and what are the duties of magistrates in Washington.
[26:00.440 --> 26:03.280]  Okay.
[26:03.280 --> 26:06.960]  In asking that question, I'm not being pedantic here.
[26:06.960 --> 26:09.960]  What I'm talking about is how to set them up.
[26:09.960 --> 26:15.560]  We had these guys that took this airplane off of an airport that belonged to a friend
[26:15.560 --> 26:22.280]  of mine, and I went to the justice of the peace and presented him with some criminal
[26:22.280 --> 26:23.280]  complaints.
[26:23.280 --> 26:27.920]  And since I wasn't an attorney and hadn't talked to an attorney, he refused to even
[26:27.920 --> 26:28.920]  read them.
[26:28.920 --> 26:35.520]  So I threw him down and stormed out of the office, and I stood there and watched him
[26:35.520 --> 26:36.520]  leave.
[26:36.520 --> 26:42.880]  When I closed behind him, I said, well, Bubba, we'll see how that works out for you, because
[26:42.880 --> 26:46.240]  I just played him like a cheap fiddle.
[26:46.240 --> 26:50.880]  I had the code in front of me, 15.09.
[26:50.880 --> 26:56.880]  Look in the criminal procedure code for Washington state.
[26:56.880 --> 26:58.960]  Find duties of magistrates.
[26:58.960 --> 27:04.440]  15.09 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure says when a complaint is forwarded to a magistrate
[27:04.440 --> 27:14.440]  complete in accordance with 15.05, and 15.05 just lists all the requisites of a criminal
[27:14.440 --> 27:15.440]  complaint.
[27:15.440 --> 27:19.480]  It must run in the state of Texas, the complaint must state that they have reason to believe
[27:19.480 --> 27:24.320]  and do believe, and it must end with against the peace and dignity of the state.
[27:24.320 --> 27:28.480]  That's the requirements of a criminal complaint, and it must be verified.
[27:28.480 --> 27:29.960]  Find that in Washington law.
[27:29.960 --> 27:39.800]  Well, the problem with Washington statute is that it's worded such that only the prosecutor
[27:39.800 --> 27:43.800]  has the authority to write a complaint.
[27:43.800 --> 27:44.800]  What?
[27:44.800 --> 27:45.800]  Not a chance.
[27:45.800 --> 27:46.800]  That sounds bizarre.
[27:46.800 --> 27:47.800]  Not a chance.
[27:47.800 --> 27:48.800]  Prosecutors are...
[27:48.800 --> 27:56.760]  It's forbidden to do that in Texas.
[27:56.760 --> 28:00.200]  In order to avoid the obvious... this is Kennedy v. State.
[28:00.200 --> 28:05.080]  In order to avoid the obvious evils of the accumulation of power in any one office for
[28:05.080 --> 28:11.640]  the purpose of initiating criminal prosecution, a prosecuting attorney is not a credible person.
[28:11.640 --> 28:20.240]  That is a horribly bad idea, and the prosecutor is simply a lawyer for the state.
[28:20.240 --> 28:28.800]  He just represents the state in criminal cases, he doesn't have any judicial powers.
[28:28.800 --> 28:33.440]  You've got to be reading it that wrong.
[28:33.440 --> 28:35.760]  Don't listen to what they tell you.
[28:35.760 --> 28:42.200]  If I take a complaint to someone and I act like I'm ignorant, they'll see me the prosecutor,
[28:42.200 --> 28:44.720]  and he refused to take it every time.
[28:44.720 --> 28:45.720]  Yeah.
[28:45.720 --> 28:52.200]  That's what got me arrested in Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas.
[28:52.200 --> 28:54.200]  The prosecutor refused...
[28:54.200 --> 29:02.000]  I gave him a criminal complaint against a judge, and he said he declined my offer.
[29:02.000 --> 29:06.040]  I guess he thought I was one of these guys into the Uniform Commercial Code.
[29:06.040 --> 29:12.480]  He declined my offer, and the investigator...
[29:12.480 --> 29:16.640]  Investigators don't talk to you, they send out their investigators with badges and guns.
[29:16.640 --> 29:19.480]  He said the prosecutor declined your offer.
[29:19.480 --> 29:25.800]  I said, well, in that case, I handed him another complaint against the district attorney.
[29:25.800 --> 29:31.200]  I need you to arrest the district attorney.
[29:31.200 --> 29:32.200]  That guy did.
[29:32.200 --> 29:33.200]  He wound up getting arrested.
[29:33.200 --> 29:37.760]  I asked the bailiff to arrest the district judge because he wouldn't have the prosecutor
[29:37.760 --> 29:40.160]  arrested.
[29:40.160 --> 29:46.400]  They called the police on me and wound up arresting me, but that's a long story.
[29:46.400 --> 29:50.360]  We're about to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, and we have our radio on the
[29:50.360 --> 29:51.360]  break.
[29:51.360 --> 29:56.960]  See if you could look up what the law actually says about duties of magistrates.
[29:56.960 --> 30:02.640]  Hang on, we'll be right back.
[30:02.640 --> 30:06.280]  It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively
[30:06.280 --> 30:07.280]  affected our health?
[30:07.280 --> 30:11.480]  Hi, Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings about how
[30:11.480 --> 30:15.760]  cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry.
[30:15.760 --> 30:17.360]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.360 --> 30:21.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy
[30:21.760 --> 30:25.760]  is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.760 --> 30:30.800]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.800 --> 30:33.520]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.520 --> 30:37.800]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:37.800 --> 30:41.340]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.340 --> 30:45.200]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.200 --> 30:49.360]  Cell phones emit radio frequency energy, it's a fact, but whether it's dangerous to have
[30:49.360 --> 30:52.680]  a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head has been disputed.
[30:52.680 --> 30:57.200]  Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns.
[30:57.200 --> 31:01.680]  Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones
[31:01.680 --> 31:02.680]  affect brain chemistry.
[31:02.680 --> 31:08.280]  A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest
[31:08.280 --> 31:11.960]  to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on.
[31:11.960 --> 31:15.880]  While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any
[31:15.880 --> 31:16.880]  chances.
[31:16.880 --> 31:20.280]  I always keep the phone far from my body, and I use a corded headset.
[31:20.280 --> 31:22.280]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:22.280 --> 31:30.600]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.600 --> 31:35.320]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11th, 2001.
[31:35.320 --> 31:38.880]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[31:38.880 --> 31:43.800]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane, although the official
[31:43.800 --> 31:46.880]  exclamation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[31:46.880 --> 31:51.720]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more
[31:51.720 --> 31:52.720]  to the story.
[31:52.720 --> 31:55.720]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[31:55.720 --> 32:01.840]  Go to buildingwatt.org, why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:01.840 --> 32:06.280]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[32:06.280 --> 32:07.280]  Word?
[32:07.280 --> 32:12.360]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture
[32:12.360 --> 32:18.760]  Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[32:18.760 --> 32:23.280]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly
[32:23.280 --> 32:25.680]  dividing the Word of Truth.
[32:25.680 --> 32:29.640]  Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse
[32:29.640 --> 32:32.960]  by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[32:32.960 --> 32:37.600]  Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[32:37.600 --> 32:39.960]  and Christian character development.
[32:39.960 --> 32:44.480]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:44.480 --> 32:48.840]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[32:48.840 --> 32:50.440]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[32:50.440 --> 32:57.760]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com, Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[32:57.760 --> 33:00.760]  motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[33:00.760 --> 33:09.680]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:09.680 --> 33:25.480]  Yeah, I got a warrant, and I'm gonna solve them, to help government them, prosecute them.
[33:25.480 --> 33:26.480]  Okay.
[33:26.480 --> 33:27.480]  All set.
[33:27.480 --> 33:46.680]  I need a prosecutor to come and help me, prosecute them wicked leader, yeah, you see, the Mamor
[33:46.680 --> 33:52.840]  are liars, them tell me, them are liars, they tell sweet stories, me not believe, me say
[33:52.840 --> 33:55.840]  what them tell me, three percent of America vote for Bush.
[33:55.840 --> 33:58.840]  So how the hell you get the presidency?
[33:58.840 --> 34:01.840]  That's why me have a warrant for him.
[34:01.840 --> 34:05.840]  Everybody listen carefully, listen to the word, don't let issues proceed.
[34:05.840 --> 34:09.840]  This is arrest from Mr. Bush.
[34:09.840 --> 34:14.840]  My warrant for the chain.
[34:14.840 --> 34:16.840]  This is arrest.
[34:16.840 --> 34:17.840]  Okay.
[34:17.840 --> 34:18.840]  We are back.
[34:18.840 --> 34:23.840]  Randy Kelcom, Brett Fountain, and Root of Law Radio, and we're talking to Kurt in Washington.
[34:23.840 --> 34:32.840]  Kurt, did you look up what your criminal procedure code states is the duty of magistrates in
[34:32.840 --> 34:33.840]  Washington state?
[34:33.840 --> 34:35.840]  I got it right here.
[34:35.840 --> 34:40.840]  It's a magistrate defined, a magistrate is an officer having power to issue a warrant
[34:40.840 --> 34:45.840]  for the arrest of a person charged with the commission of a crime.
[34:45.840 --> 34:51.840]  So that's how they structure it so that, you know, I can't charge somebody with a crime,
[34:51.840 --> 34:56.840]  so that's how they're gatekeeping it with the prosecuting attorneys.
[34:56.840 --> 34:57.840]  No, no, no, no, no.
[34:57.840 --> 34:59.840]  You are missing something.
[34:59.840 --> 35:03.840]  That's exactly what it says in Texas.
[35:03.840 --> 35:10.840]  Not exactly those words, but that's what a magistrate's job is.
[35:10.840 --> 35:18.840]  He can issue warrants, find probable cause, marry people.
[35:18.840 --> 35:21.840]  I think he can do it.
[35:21.840 --> 35:22.840]  Is it just JPs or is it magistrates that do inquests?
[35:22.840 --> 35:24.840]  I think it's just JPs.
[35:24.840 --> 35:28.840]  They didn't marry people so they can make a few extra bucks.
[35:28.840 --> 35:35.840]  And later on they let them hear small claims cases and classy misdemeanors, but that was secondary.
[35:35.840 --> 35:44.840]  They were originally put in place because of the Magna Carta Libertatum signed into law in 1215 A.D.
[35:44.840 --> 35:51.840]  And their purpose was to stand between the policeman and the jailhouse door.
[35:51.840 --> 35:54.840]  The policeman did not hold the key to the jail.
[35:54.840 --> 35:55.840]  The magistrate did.
[35:55.840 --> 36:02.840]  So if a policeman arrests someone for any reason, he is to take him directly to the nearest magistrate
[36:02.840 --> 36:07.840]  and present his complaint to the magistrate.
[36:07.840 --> 36:12.840]  And the magistrate would either issue a confinement order if the person was under arrest
[36:12.840 --> 36:18.840]  or if the policeman went to the magistrate and gave him notice that a crime had been committed,
[36:18.840 --> 36:23.840]  he would authorize the policeman to arrest the person by issue warrant.
[36:23.840 --> 36:27.840]  His job, the prosecutor can't do that.
[36:27.840 --> 36:33.840]  So they're saying take it to the prosecutor and the prosecutor's going to make a determination of probable cause?
[36:33.840 --> 36:34.840]  No, no, no.
[36:34.840 --> 36:38.840]  The only state that allows that is Pennsylvania.
[36:38.840 --> 36:49.840]  But to make up for that, in Pennsylvania, unlike all other states, you have standing when filing a criminal complaint.
[36:49.840 --> 36:53.840]  So if the prosecutor opts not to prosecute,
[36:53.840 --> 36:59.840]  then you can appeal the prosecutor's decision to the Court of Common Pleas and all the way up to the Supreme.
[36:59.840 --> 37:02.840]  I'm not seeing anything like that in Washington.
[37:02.840 --> 37:09.840]  There's most other states, all the western states at least, that are not commonwealths that follow essentially Spanish law.
[37:09.840 --> 37:13.840]  And in Spanish law, you have a duty to report crime,
[37:13.840 --> 37:19.840]  but you have no standing as to the enforcement of the criminal statute.
[37:19.840 --> 37:24.840]  That's what they created public prosecutors for.
[37:24.840 --> 37:26.840]  He's the prosecutor.
[37:26.840 --> 37:30.840]  He prosecutes a crime once it's in the system.
[37:30.840 --> 37:33.840]  But prosecutors say, now, wait a minute.
[37:33.840 --> 37:36.840]  We're the guys who have to prosecute.
[37:36.840 --> 37:44.840]  We should be the ones to determine whether or not there is sufficient evidence to warrant a prosecution.
[37:44.840 --> 37:48.840]  And our founders said, absolutely not.
[37:48.840 --> 37:52.840]  That was absolutely a horrible idea.
[37:52.840 --> 37:53.840]  The feds format it.
[37:53.840 --> 37:54.840]  Texas format it.
[37:54.840 --> 37:59.840]  Every state I've looked at format it except Pennsylvania.
[37:59.840 --> 38:08.840]  But Pennsylvania added something else to give you redress to protect us against prosecutors.
[38:08.840 --> 38:13.840]  I'm looking at Washington state legislature site here,
[38:13.840 --> 38:19.840]  and I'm seeing hints and signs that Washington is like the rest.
[38:19.840 --> 38:28.840]  And I'm seeing in Chapter 10.16, it's talking about examinations by preliminary hearings.
[38:28.840 --> 38:36.840]  And it's talking about the magistrate is going to make a determination of probable cause.
[38:36.840 --> 38:42.840]  He's going to, upon the whole examination, he might say that it appears no offense has been committed
[38:42.840 --> 38:48.840]  or that there's not probable cause for charging the defendant.
[38:48.840 --> 38:50.840]  So he's discharged.
[38:50.840 --> 38:54.840]  All of this looks very familiar, like what we've seen in other states,
[38:54.840 --> 38:59.840]  that it's the magistrate taking the complaint and saying, whoops, that's frivolous.
[38:59.840 --> 39:06.840]  What we're talking about here, Kurt, is how to put them on the dime.
[39:06.840 --> 39:12.840]  If the police want to protect this couple, let's, you know, I went to my prosecutor once,
[39:12.840 --> 39:17.840]  and Greg Lowry and I've known him for years, and we had a pretty good relationship.
[39:17.840 --> 39:21.840]  And I walked in his office, and I put a dime on his desk.
[39:21.840 --> 39:26.840]  And he looked at that, looked at me, and he said, Mr. Kelton,
[39:26.840 --> 39:30.840]  I'm sure you're going to explain to me what that is for.
[39:30.840 --> 39:34.840]  I said, yeah, Greg, I'm going to put you on one.
[39:34.840 --> 39:38.840]  The least I could do is give it to you.
[39:38.840 --> 39:41.840]  This is the stance you need to take.
[39:41.840 --> 39:45.840]  You don't care what they want.
[39:45.840 --> 39:46.840]  They are your servants.
[39:46.840 --> 39:48.840]  You are the master.
[39:48.840 --> 39:55.840]  You're not down there to ask them for favors or try to get them to do what the law commands them to do.
[39:55.840 --> 40:05.840]  If the police want to try to protect these people, let's see how the police protect themselves from you.
[40:05.840 --> 40:11.840]  If you go to the police and they commit misfeasance in office by failing to perform a duty they're required to perform
[40:11.840 --> 40:14.840]  and they haven't known that a crime has been committed,
[40:14.840 --> 40:18.840]  they have a duty to take some action in Texas.
[40:18.840 --> 40:20.840]  They have a duty to give notice to some magistrate.
[40:20.840 --> 40:25.840]  If they don't do that, they fail to perform a duty they are required to perform.
[40:25.840 --> 40:31.840]  Do you have an official misconduct statute in Washington State?
[40:31.840 --> 40:34.840]  You know it, but I did many times.
[40:34.840 --> 40:42.840]  So any time you ask a policeman to do something, you need to follow one of my rules.
[40:42.840 --> 40:49.840]  Never ask a public official to do anything you actually want them to do
[40:49.840 --> 40:57.840]  because you never ask a public official to do anything that the law does not compel him to do.
[40:57.840 --> 41:03.840]  Remember earlier when I said I went to this Justice of the Peace and gave him these criminal complaints?
[41:03.840 --> 41:06.840]  He said, Mr. Kelton, are you an attorney?
[41:06.840 --> 41:08.840]  Oh, no, no, no.
[41:08.840 --> 41:12.840]  I sleep well at night and keep my hands in my old pockets, thank you very much.
[41:12.840 --> 41:15.840]  Well, he didn't find the humor in that.
[41:15.840 --> 41:18.840]  And I guess he thought I was just joking around.
[41:18.840 --> 41:20.840]  He said, did you talk to her attorney?
[41:20.840 --> 41:22.840]  Oh, I don't waste my time with those shysters.
[41:22.840 --> 41:24.840]  They don't know squat.
[41:24.840 --> 41:26.840]  So he threw him down and said, I'm not even going to read it.
[41:26.840 --> 41:28.840]  If you're not an attorney, I'm not going to read this.
[41:28.840 --> 41:31.840]  He threw him down and stormed out.
[41:31.840 --> 41:35.840]  That's why I said, well, Bubba, we'll see how that works out for you.
[41:35.840 --> 41:43.840]  And I picked up my cell phone and dialed 9-1-1 because I had read 15.09.
[41:43.840 --> 41:49.840]  And it said, when a complaint is forwarded to a magistrate, complete the course of 15.05,
[41:49.840 --> 41:55.840]  the magistrate shall issue a warrant forthwith.
[41:55.840 --> 42:00.840]  See what you got in Washington.
[42:00.840 --> 42:05.840]  See what the duty of that magistrate is, and then go down there
[42:05.840 --> 42:11.840]  and coax the magistrate into failing to perform that duty.
[42:11.840 --> 42:16.840]  And then you go to another magistrate and file against that magistrate
[42:16.840 --> 42:20.840]  for not doing what you're asking this magistrate to do.
[42:20.840 --> 42:24.840]  Well, it's hard to go in front of magistrates because I've had somewhere
[42:24.840 --> 42:31.840]  between $10,000 and $45,000 in bench warrants out on me for the last 15 months.
[42:31.840 --> 42:38.840]  So I don't generally go in to try to go for judges because there's a little concern there.
[42:38.840 --> 42:41.840]  Wow, that's a lot of bench warrants.
[42:41.840 --> 42:44.840]  Well, so mail it to them.
[42:44.840 --> 42:48.840]  Put it in a certified mail, and when they get it, they got it.
[42:48.840 --> 42:58.840]  And put a cover letter on it asking them to date this on the date that you issued the warrant
[42:58.840 --> 43:03.840]  and return it to you in the included stamp self-address envelope.
[43:03.840 --> 43:06.840]  You're not going to get that back.
[43:06.840 --> 43:12.840]  And if you don't get it back within two weeks, then you have reason to believe
[43:12.840 --> 43:16.840]  and do believe that the magistrate failed to perform a duty he is required to perform.
[43:16.840 --> 43:20.840]  It doesn't make any difference how many warrants you have out for you.
[43:20.840 --> 43:24.840]  That is a crime on part of the magistrate, and then you take a complaint
[43:24.840 --> 43:28.840]  and file it with the next higher level magistrate.
[43:28.840 --> 43:32.840]  What I'm doing in Texas is walking from the bottom to the top.
[43:32.840 --> 43:38.840]  I will eventually get to Sharon Keller, presiding judge of the Court of Criminal Appeals,
[43:38.840 --> 43:45.840]  and then to Nathan Hedge, presiding judge of the Texas Supreme.
[43:45.840 --> 43:49.840]  And when they don't act, I'll file criminal charges against all of them with a fed.
[43:49.840 --> 43:54.840]  Now you got these people down here on the bottom that are about to run off the cliff,
[43:54.840 --> 43:57.840]  and we'll be right back.
[43:57.840 --> 44:00.840]  You thought I was going to run off.
[44:00.840 --> 44:04.840]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[44:04.840 --> 44:06.840]  except in the area of nutrition.
[44:06.840 --> 44:11.840]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.840 --> 44:17.840]  The primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.840 --> 44:22.840]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[44:22.840 --> 44:25.840]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[44:25.840 --> 44:31.840]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[44:31.840 --> 44:36.840]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much we became a marketing distributor
[44:36.840 --> 44:39.840]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:39.840 --> 44:42.840]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com,
[44:42.840 --> 44:47.840]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[44:47.840 --> 44:51.840]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[44:51.840 --> 44:54.840]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[44:54.840 --> 44:58.840]  help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[44:58.840 --> 45:00.840]  Order now.
[45:00.840 --> 45:03.840]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:03.840 --> 45:07.840]  Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary.
[45:07.840 --> 45:15.840]  There's an affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.840 --> 45:19.840]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.840 --> 45:23.840]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.840 --> 45:28.840]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.840 --> 45:34.840]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.840 --> 45:38.840]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:38.840 --> 45:43.840]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.840 --> 45:49.840]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.840 --> 45:52.840]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.840 --> 46:14.840]  Visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:14.840 --> 46:23.840]  Whoa, whoa, yeah.
[46:23.840 --> 46:29.840]  Always, I must be careful what I'm wishing for.
[46:29.840 --> 46:34.840]  When I'm hungry, I like to know just what I'm fishing for.
[46:34.840 --> 46:40.840]  I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton.
[46:40.840 --> 46:46.840]  I'm just here making my living pushing buttons.
[46:46.840 --> 46:52.840]  I'll give my message out to anyone in shot and distance.
[46:52.840 --> 46:55.840]  I'm both for bravery and against slavery.
[46:55.840 --> 46:57.840]  Okay, we are back.
[46:57.840 --> 47:00.840]  Randy Kelsey.
[47:00.840 --> 47:02.840]  Bert, I have a question.
[47:02.840 --> 47:04.840]  So, yeah.
[47:04.840 --> 47:05.840]  You went to the sheriff.
[47:05.840 --> 47:06.840]  I have a question.
[47:06.840 --> 47:10.840]  So, yeah, I'm not really concerned with dealing with the police and the judges
[47:10.840 --> 47:12.840]  and the prosecutors right now.
[47:12.840 --> 47:14.840]  I'll deal with them next week.
[47:14.840 --> 47:15.840]  Oh, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[47:15.840 --> 47:18.840]  You are missing the whole point.
[47:18.840 --> 47:20.840]  Okay.
[47:20.840 --> 47:23.840]  You said you went to the sheriff and they wouldn't take your complaints.
[47:23.840 --> 47:27.840]  You go to the prosecutor and he won't take your complaints.
[47:27.840 --> 47:33.840]  This is how you get their attention.
[47:33.840 --> 47:35.840]  It's not about getting anybody, a prosecutor, in trouble.
[47:35.840 --> 47:37.840]  It's about getting their attention.
[47:37.840 --> 47:39.840]  It's like the mule, you can't get to do anything.
[47:39.840 --> 47:43.840]  You pick up a tube and hit him between the eyes.
[47:43.840 --> 47:44.840]  That's not abusing the mule.
[47:44.840 --> 47:46.840]  You just got to get his attention.
[47:46.840 --> 47:52.840]  No, trust me, I have the attention of the judges and the sheriff's department
[47:52.840 --> 47:55.840]  and the police like I have all of their attention.
[47:55.840 --> 47:56.840]  That's not initiated.
[47:56.840 --> 47:58.840]  Yeah, that's not what I'm talking about.
[47:58.840 --> 48:01.840]  You have their attention, but they're not doing anything you're asking them to do.
[48:01.840 --> 48:03.840]  They're not doing what the law commands them to do.
[48:03.840 --> 48:08.840]  You only have attention, but not the attention you need.
[48:08.840 --> 48:12.840]  Pam, if you have all these bench warrants,
[48:12.840 --> 48:19.840]  how did you manage to get out of the police station without being in jail?
[48:19.840 --> 48:24.840]  You mean when I was talking about going in with my process server friends?
[48:24.840 --> 48:30.840]  That was during about a four-week time where I didn't have any bench warrants.
[48:30.840 --> 48:33.840]  Oh.
[48:33.840 --> 48:36.840]  They're all bogus bench warrants.
[48:36.840 --> 48:40.840]  The city is just trying to mess with me because it's a literal vast conspiracy
[48:40.840 --> 48:42.840]  where they're just trying to shut me up.
[48:42.840 --> 48:48.840]  But I do have a potential way I wanted to ask you about regarding criminal complaints
[48:48.840 --> 48:52.840]  because in my lawsuit as evidence exhibits A through G,
[48:52.840 --> 48:58.840]  I have about 50 pages of detailed criminal complaints against my kid's mom or fiance,
[48:58.840 --> 49:01.840]  the family attorney, and their friends.
[49:01.840 --> 49:10.840]  Is there a way since there's an ongoing case with the assigned judge
[49:10.840 --> 49:18.840]  to do a judicial notice of the criminal complaints that are already on the record?
[49:18.840 --> 49:20.840]  Can I do a motion to...
[49:20.840 --> 49:21.840]  No.
[49:21.840 --> 49:25.840]  Technically, if I was the attorney on the other side,
[49:25.840 --> 49:30.840]  I would say objection, relevance.
[49:30.840 --> 49:34.840]  How are they relevant to this civil action?
[49:34.840 --> 49:41.840]  Because they're relevant to the abuse of process, the bearer tree, and the coercion.
[49:41.840 --> 49:45.840]  So have you accused them of bearer tree?
[49:45.840 --> 49:46.840]  Yeah.
[49:46.840 --> 49:47.840]  I mean, officially.
[49:47.840 --> 49:50.840]  Explicitly, yes.
[49:50.840 --> 49:55.840]  RCW 9.12 bearer tree.
[49:55.840 --> 49:56.840]  Okay.
[49:56.840 --> 49:58.840]  This is...
[49:58.840 --> 50:03.840]  I'm trying to figure out how this is relevant to...
[50:03.840 --> 50:10.840]  This is a criminal case, and criminal generally is not part of a civil case.
[50:10.840 --> 50:12.840]  If they committed a crime against you,
[50:12.840 --> 50:16.840]  that doesn't necessarily mean they committed a civil tort.
[50:16.840 --> 50:19.840]  The civil tort is different.
[50:19.840 --> 50:28.840]  If I was the opposing counsel, I would certainly object as to relevance.
[50:28.840 --> 50:32.840]  I haven't gotten the objection from either of the attorneys.
[50:32.840 --> 50:36.840]  They seem so busy trying to avoid recorded depositions
[50:36.840 --> 50:40.840]  that that's all they can think about.
[50:40.840 --> 50:42.840]  Okay.
[50:42.840 --> 50:45.840]  I've gotten distracted, Randy.
[50:45.840 --> 50:50.840]  What I'm trying to get to is something, is to get more pointed.
[50:50.840 --> 50:55.840]  So you go right for them.
[50:55.840 --> 50:58.840]  If you file criminal charges against them,
[50:58.840 --> 51:00.840]  or you're trying to file criminal charges against them,
[51:00.840 --> 51:04.840]  and everybody's running interference for them,
[51:04.840 --> 51:08.840]  when you start going after the ones who are running interference,
[51:08.840 --> 51:12.840]  what they're going to do is go back to this person and say,
[51:12.840 --> 51:16.840]  you better get this guy off my case.
[51:16.840 --> 51:20.840]  I'm not going to be sued because of you.
[51:20.840 --> 51:22.840]  It's all politics.
[51:22.840 --> 51:24.840]  Create a little politics in your favor.
[51:24.840 --> 51:26.840]  They don't have to like you.
[51:26.840 --> 51:28.840]  Better if they don't.
[51:28.840 --> 51:31.840]  They have to worry about you hammering them.
[51:31.840 --> 51:38.840]  If you go to them and let them do whatever they want to, nobody's impressed.
[51:38.840 --> 51:39.840]  That's why I have this rule.
[51:39.840 --> 51:42.840]  Never ask a public official to do anything you want them to,
[51:42.840 --> 51:44.840]  because as soon as they don't, boom,
[51:44.840 --> 51:47.840]  you should already have the complaint against them in your hand,
[51:47.840 --> 51:50.840]  because you know what they're going to do.
[51:50.840 --> 51:53.840]  I love to call 911.
[51:53.840 --> 52:00.840]  And when the 911 guy gets there, I pull out my 911 responder complaint.
[52:00.840 --> 52:05.840]  And when he refuses to take my complaint against the ones I called against,
[52:05.840 --> 52:09.840]  then I start filling this one out and ask him to get his supervisor over here
[52:09.840 --> 52:12.840]  so I can give him this complaint against you.
[52:12.840 --> 52:18.840]  And they look at that and they think, not this guy's first rodeo.
[52:18.840 --> 52:20.840]  That chump just set me up for that.
[52:20.840 --> 52:22.840]  Yeah, matter of fact, that didn't.
[52:22.840 --> 52:27.840]  When they think you're setting them up, everything changes.
[52:27.840 --> 52:33.840]  Oh, no, they literally, I had cops on camera over a year ago tell me,
[52:33.840 --> 52:35.840]  we know you're trying to set us up.
[52:35.840 --> 52:36.840]  We're not going to look at the paperwork.
[52:36.840 --> 52:39.840]  You're trying to handle us, hand us right now.
[52:39.840 --> 52:42.840]  Did you call 911?
[52:42.840 --> 52:44.840]  Yeah, yeah, yeah.
[52:44.840 --> 52:47.840]  If you didn't, you missed an opportunity.
[52:47.840 --> 52:48.840]  No, I did. Yeah, trust me.
[52:48.840 --> 52:50.840]  I've done that like plenty of times.
[52:50.840 --> 52:52.840]  My beef actually isn't with the cops.
[52:52.840 --> 52:54.840]  They don't mess with me.
[52:54.840 --> 52:58.840]  They follow me around like respectfully.
[52:58.840 --> 53:03.840]  They know there's bench warrants, they're actively not doing anything about it.
[53:03.840 --> 53:08.840]  My beef isn't with the city, it's with the judges and the prosecutor's office
[53:08.840 --> 53:13.840]  because the city attorney's office, basically,
[53:13.840 --> 53:17.840]  they've got their legal liaisons with the police department.
[53:17.840 --> 53:24.840]  And the police department knows, because they've received so many criminal complaints,
[53:24.840 --> 53:29.840]  they know that the prosecutor's office is not going to do anything to prosecute
[53:29.840 --> 53:31.840]  any of the people that have harmed me.
[53:31.840 --> 53:34.840]  So it's just this weird stalemate.
[53:34.840 --> 53:39.840]  Have you stepped it up a notch to the feds?
[53:39.840 --> 53:40.840]  Yeah.
[53:40.840 --> 53:47.840]  The feds are not going to do anything either, but when they have to get a call from the feds,
[53:47.840 --> 53:51.840]  it's going to get their attention.
[53:51.840 --> 53:53.840]  Yeah, they hung up on me last time.
[53:53.840 --> 53:58.840]  No, no, no, never talk to the feds.
[53:58.840 --> 54:03.840]  Anybody you talk to with the feds is just there to blow you off.
[54:03.840 --> 54:05.840]  They do it in writing.
[54:05.840 --> 54:12.840]  Send a verified criminal complaint to the special agent in charge of your local FBI.
[54:12.840 --> 54:15.840]  That's the only one whose name you can get.
[54:15.840 --> 54:22.840]  So you send it to him personally and put the cover letter on it to let him know,
[54:22.840 --> 54:26.840]  have him let you know when he presented that to some magistrate
[54:26.840 --> 54:28.840]  and what magistrate it was presented to.
[54:28.840 --> 54:31.840]  You're not going to get that letter back.
[54:31.840 --> 54:36.840]  When you don't get it back, then you file a criminal complaint against the special agent in charge
[54:36.840 --> 54:40.840]  with the federal grand jury.
[54:40.840 --> 54:44.840]  And the U.S. attorney is going to intercept that one.
[54:44.840 --> 54:51.840]  And if he's like the one in Fort Lauderdale, he'll call you and threaten you with jury tampering
[54:51.840 --> 54:57.840]  if you attempt to approach the grand jury again.
[54:57.840 --> 55:01.840]  And I told him, knock yourself out.
[55:01.840 --> 55:04.840]  You charge me with jury tampering, I'll charge you with obstruction.
[55:04.840 --> 55:06.840]  We'll see how this works out for you.
[55:06.840 --> 55:08.840]  He hung up the phone.
[55:08.840 --> 55:13.840]  They fired the IRS agent the next day.
[55:13.840 --> 55:20.840]  When you file against the special agent in charge, nothing's going to happen with that.
[55:20.840 --> 55:25.840]  But the special agent in charge is not going to be a happy camper.
[55:25.840 --> 55:30.840]  And he's going to send two guys in suits out there to talk to these local officials,
[55:30.840 --> 55:35.840]  and he will get their attention.
[55:35.840 --> 55:38.840]  What politics?
[55:38.840 --> 55:41.840]  Yeah, that might be the only thing that works here because, you know,
[55:41.840 --> 55:45.840]  the city and the county, they already know, I know, they know, you know,
[55:45.840 --> 55:50.840]  because I filed a lawsuit against naming a bunch of them in the Fed back in September,
[55:50.840 --> 55:52.840]  just as a calling card.
[55:52.840 --> 55:57.840]  So they're all on notice, but they're continuing, you know,
[55:57.840 --> 56:02.840]  they basically circled their wagons and they're just hoping I go away, you know.
[56:02.840 --> 56:03.840]  They're not changing their behavior.
[56:03.840 --> 56:04.840]  They're still breaking the law.
[56:04.840 --> 56:05.840]  They know they're breaking the law.
[56:05.840 --> 56:07.840]  They know I know they're breaking the law.
[56:07.840 --> 56:10.840]  And they're just basically daring me to do something about it.
[56:10.840 --> 56:11.840]  Yeah, they're daring you.
[56:11.840 --> 56:12.840]  That's what I started to say.
[56:12.840 --> 56:13.840]  They're daring you to do something.
[56:13.840 --> 56:16.840]  So take it to the Fed.
[56:16.840 --> 56:19.840]  The Fed is actually easier than the state.
[56:19.840 --> 56:21.840]  The Fed is more cautious.
[56:21.840 --> 56:25.840]  And the rule is take the state to the Fed and the Fed to the state.
[56:25.840 --> 56:27.840]  They don't tend not to like each other.
[56:27.840 --> 56:31.840]  So when you send that letter to the special agent in charge,
[56:31.840 --> 56:33.840]  make sure you've insured it.
[56:33.840 --> 56:37.840]  Pay an extra 15 bucks and you insure it for 500 bucks.
[56:37.840 --> 56:42.840]  Then when you don't get that cover letter back, you call the local postmaster
[56:42.840 --> 56:45.840]  and say, I want my 500 bucks.
[56:45.840 --> 56:47.840]  See, I sent this to the special agent in charge
[56:47.840 --> 56:50.840]  and I put a cover letter on it with a stamped self-addressed envelope
[56:50.840 --> 56:53.840]  and I didn't get that back.
[56:53.840 --> 56:57.840]  So I have reason to believe you guys didn't deliver it like you said you would.
[56:57.840 --> 57:00.840]  I want my 500 bucks insurance.
[57:00.840 --> 57:02.840]  Well, they're not going to want to give you 500 bucks
[57:02.840 --> 57:04.840]  because that would raise their bond rate.
[57:04.840 --> 57:09.840]  So they're going to send a couple postal inspectors down there.
[57:09.840 --> 57:13.840]  I had a friend who was in mail order years ago
[57:13.840 --> 57:19.840]  and we were talking about the Feds and he said, oh, man, you think the Feds are bad?
[57:19.840 --> 57:24.840]  You ain't lived until you had the postal inspectors after you.
[57:24.840 --> 57:28.840]  And the Feds treat postal inspectors like errand stump children.
[57:28.840 --> 57:32.840]  You give them an opportunity to go down there and stomp on the Feds,
[57:32.840 --> 57:35.840]  they're likely to send you a Christmas card.
[57:35.840 --> 57:40.840]  And they will force the SAC to admit that he got it.
[57:40.840 --> 57:44.840]  And they will get his attention.
[57:44.840 --> 57:49.840]  Then you file against him with the grand jury
[57:49.840 --> 57:52.840]  and you'll definitely have the U.S. attorney in the way.
[57:52.840 --> 57:55.840]  And the way you get the U.S. attorney to block you,
[57:55.840 --> 58:00.840]  you put a letter in there asking the foreman to initial this cover letter
[58:00.840 --> 58:04.840]  and return it in a stamped self-addressed envelope.
[58:04.840 --> 58:07.840]  Do not sign it.
[58:07.840 --> 58:11.840]  Because the prosecuting attorney has a rubber stamp with your name on it
[58:11.840 --> 58:14.840]  that he uses to stamp superseding indictments with
[58:14.840 --> 58:19.840]  and we want to make sure he's not rubber stamping this document.
[58:19.840 --> 58:26.840]  Well, what do you think the chances are the U.S. attorney is going to let the foreman see that?
[58:26.840 --> 58:31.840]  You can be sure you got a shot at the U.S. attorney.
[58:31.840 --> 58:36.840]  Okay, hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[58:36.840 --> 58:38.840]  We've got a full board of college tonight.
[58:38.840 --> 58:41.840]  I guess my whining worked, Kirk.
[58:41.840 --> 58:45.840]  Well, hey, can I let you get to those guys?
[58:45.840 --> 58:49.840]  Wait, wait, hang on. We'll be right back.
[58:49.840 --> 58:53.840]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:53.840 --> 58:57.840]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible
[58:57.840 --> 59:00.840]  and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:00.840 --> 59:05.840]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:05.840 --> 59:09.840]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes
[59:09.840 --> 59:12.840]  that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:12.840 --> 59:17.840]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:17.840 --> 59:20.840]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[59:20.840 --> 59:27.840]  clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church.
[59:27.840 --> 59:33.840]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:33.840 --> 59:40.840]  call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.840 --> 59:44.840]  That's 888-551-0102.
[59:44.840 --> 59:59.840]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:59.840 --> 01:00:05.840]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:05.840 --> 01:00:08.840]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:08.840 --> 01:00:10.840]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:10.840 --> 01:00:16.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:16.840 --> 01:00:18.840]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:18.840 --> 01:00:22.840]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:22.840 --> 01:00:26.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:26.840 --> 01:00:28.840]  So protect your rights.
[01:00:28.840 --> 01:00:32.840]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:32.840 --> 01:00:34.840]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:34.840 --> 01:00:38.840]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:00:38.840 --> 01:00:42.840]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:42.840 --> 01:00:45.840]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:45.840 --> 01:00:48.840]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[01:00:48.840 --> 01:00:51.840]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[01:00:51.840 --> 01:00:54.840]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:54.840 --> 01:01:00.840]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent.
[01:01:00.840 --> 01:01:06.840]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days of our Founding Fathers.
[01:01:06.840 --> 01:01:08.840]  Third party, Third Amendment, get it?
[01:01:08.840 --> 01:01:12.840]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging,
[01:01:12.840 --> 01:01:16.840]  tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and re-read the Third Amendment.
[01:01:16.840 --> 01:01:31.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:31.840 --> 01:01:34.840]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:34.840 --> 01:01:38.840]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:38.840 --> 01:01:40.840]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:40.840 --> 01:01:46.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:01:46.840 --> 01:01:48.840]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:48.840 --> 01:01:51.840]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:51.840 --> 01:01:56.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:56.840 --> 01:02:01.840]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:01.840 --> 01:02:04.840]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:04.840 --> 01:02:07.840]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:02:07.840 --> 01:02:11.840]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:11.840 --> 01:02:15.840]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:15.840 --> 01:02:21.840]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[01:02:21.840 --> 01:02:27.840]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure.
[01:02:27.840 --> 01:02:30.840]  Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it?
[01:02:30.840 --> 01:02:34.840]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security.
[01:02:34.840 --> 01:02:39.840]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[01:02:39.840 --> 01:02:43.840]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause,
[01:02:43.840 --> 01:02:46.840]  I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:02:46.840 --> 01:02:49.840]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[01:02:49.840 --> 01:02:53.840]  and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:53.840 --> 01:03:00.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:24.840 --> 01:03:28.840]  the
[01:03:28.840 --> 01:03:31.840]  the
[01:03:31.840 --> 01:03:34.840]  the
[01:03:34.840 --> 01:03:37.840]  the
[01:03:37.840 --> 01:03:40.840]  the
[01:03:40.840 --> 01:03:43.840]  the
[01:03:43.840 --> 01:03:46.840]  the
[01:03:46.840 --> 01:03:49.840]  the
[01:03:49.840 --> 01:04:08.560]  Okay, we are back on this Friday, the 16th day of September, our four hour info marathon
[01:04:08.560 --> 01:04:13.720]  and we've viewed up a whole hour on Kurt in Washington.
[01:04:13.720 --> 01:04:14.720]  I know.
[01:04:14.720 --> 01:04:17.120]  I will bow out so you can get to the other callers.
[01:04:17.120 --> 01:04:18.180]  I appreciate your time.
[01:04:18.180 --> 01:04:23.080]  I'll let you know how the depositions go with the defendants next week.
[01:04:23.080 --> 01:04:28.720]  Just so you know, we figured out who you are.
[01:04:28.720 --> 01:04:36.160]  You don't know who I am, but I know where you live, Bubba.
[01:04:36.160 --> 01:04:37.520]  He's on our telegram channel.
[01:04:37.520 --> 01:04:42.160]  For those of you who don't know, we have a telegram channel with a couple thousand people
[01:04:42.160 --> 01:04:43.160]  in there.
[01:04:43.160 --> 01:04:48.360]  It gets pretty lively sometimes and if anybody wants a link to it, just send me an email
[01:04:48.360 --> 01:04:53.920]  randy at ruleoflawradio.com and I will send you a link to it.
[01:04:53.920 --> 01:04:56.040]  Okay.
[01:04:56.040 --> 01:04:57.040]  Thank you, Kurt.
[01:04:57.040 --> 01:04:58.040]  Thanks, Kurt.
[01:04:58.040 --> 01:04:59.040]  Thank you, Randy.
[01:04:59.040 --> 01:05:00.040]  Take care.
[01:05:00.040 --> 01:05:01.040]  Okay.
[01:05:01.040 --> 01:05:03.880]  Now we're going to go to Jerry in Pennsylvania.
[01:05:03.880 --> 01:05:07.160]  What have you been up to, Jerry?
[01:05:07.160 --> 01:05:09.840]  Yeah, Randy.
[01:05:09.840 --> 01:05:17.280]  I got this back from the mandamus.
[01:05:17.280 --> 01:05:27.800]  They said, the circus said that motion by appellate to file petition for the mandamus
[01:05:27.800 --> 01:05:30.880]  out of time, 46 days out.
[01:05:30.880 --> 01:05:36.160]  Is there anything else I can do for this?
[01:05:36.160 --> 01:05:40.440]  What was the nature of the mandamus?
[01:05:40.440 --> 01:05:43.600]  Did it go to subject matter jurisdiction?
[01:05:43.600 --> 01:05:50.800]  There were a couple of them in there.
[01:05:50.800 --> 01:05:53.600]  One was subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:05:53.600 --> 01:05:57.280]  You can challenge... That should get an appeal to the Supreme.
[01:05:57.280 --> 01:06:03.400]  I'm preparing a mandamus for a case where the judge just blew off everything and it's
[01:06:03.400 --> 01:06:05.760]  taken quite a while, so it's a lot of time.
[01:06:05.760 --> 01:06:06.960]  Jurisdiction takes a lot of time.
[01:06:06.960 --> 01:06:11.000]  I just call it a challenge, subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:15.520]  I'm claiming that the appellate court has no jurisdiction because the trial court didn't
[01:06:15.520 --> 01:06:22.760]  have jurisdiction, because the trial judge was improperly appointed to sit in the case
[01:06:22.760 --> 01:06:26.440]  and he had no power to sit in this case.
[01:06:26.440 --> 01:06:31.480]  Since it's subject matter jurisdiction, there's no time limit on it.
[01:06:31.480 --> 01:06:39.280]  Subject matter jurisdiction can be challenged no matter how remote in history.
[01:06:39.280 --> 01:06:41.040]  How far back in time.
[01:06:41.040 --> 01:06:46.640]  You can pull ahead with a subject matter jurisdiction challenge.
[01:06:46.640 --> 01:06:54.200]  Did they give you findings of fact and conclusions at law, or if it isn't a fair, did they give
[01:06:54.200 --> 01:06:55.200]  you a judgment?
[01:06:55.200 --> 01:06:56.200]  Oh, no.
[01:06:56.200 --> 01:07:02.360]  This is in the circuit.
[01:07:02.360 --> 01:07:03.360]  State circuit, federal circuit.
[01:07:03.360 --> 01:07:10.600]  On the bottom of the order, the order says the foregoing motion is going to die.
[01:07:10.600 --> 01:07:14.360]  Is this a state court or a federal court?
[01:07:14.360 --> 01:07:15.360]  In the circuit.
[01:07:15.360 --> 01:07:16.360]  What circuit?
[01:07:16.360 --> 01:07:17.360]  State circuit, fed circuit.
[01:07:17.360 --> 01:07:18.360]  Oh, the US court.
[01:07:18.360 --> 01:07:19.360]  Oh, okay.
[01:07:19.360 --> 01:07:27.080]  There has to be an order by itself is not complete.
[01:07:27.080 --> 01:07:29.600]  There must be a judgment.
[01:07:29.600 --> 01:07:30.600]  Right.
[01:07:30.600 --> 01:07:33.600]  Did you get it?
[01:07:33.600 --> 01:07:35.640]  This time.
[01:07:35.640 --> 01:07:42.480]  Then the order is not complete.
[01:07:42.480 --> 01:07:46.320]  You need to request findings of fact and conclusions at law.
[01:07:46.320 --> 01:07:56.240]  Okay, well, I can recommit asking for facts and conclusions of a law.
[01:07:56.240 --> 01:07:57.240]  Yeah.
[01:07:57.240 --> 01:08:00.600]  An order in the Fed, an order is not enough.
[01:08:00.600 --> 01:08:02.600]  There must be a judgment.
[01:08:02.600 --> 01:08:04.400]  Yeah, I know.
[01:08:04.400 --> 01:08:05.400]  I got one back.
[01:08:05.400 --> 01:08:09.400]  I know what it's supposed to look like.
[01:08:09.400 --> 01:08:14.040]  So he needs to show you chapter and verse, and generally the Fed's pretty good about
[01:08:14.040 --> 01:08:17.320]  that.
[01:08:17.320 --> 01:08:18.320]  You'll hammer it.
[01:08:18.320 --> 01:08:19.320]  Okay.
[01:08:19.320 --> 01:08:20.320]  Yeah.
[01:08:20.320 --> 01:08:23.680]  That's the way I'll rather it up then.
[01:08:23.680 --> 01:08:24.680]  I wasn't too sure.
[01:08:24.680 --> 01:08:27.680]  I forgot about the subject matter jurisdiction challenge.
[01:08:27.680 --> 01:08:31.800]  I know you kept saying that over and over.
[01:08:31.800 --> 01:08:32.800]  Okay.
[01:08:32.800 --> 01:08:35.920]  Yeah, I always want to go in with a subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:08:35.920 --> 01:08:39.120]  That avoids any of those time issues.
[01:08:39.120 --> 01:08:40.120]  Right.
[01:08:40.120 --> 01:08:41.120]  Yeah.
[01:08:41.120 --> 01:08:45.400]  Okay, well, one more thing here.
[01:08:45.400 --> 01:08:54.560]  I filed a complaint against the attorneys on this one case.
[01:08:54.560 --> 01:09:09.680]  I filed a case in US District Court, and they just filed it right in with the case.
[01:09:09.680 --> 01:09:19.520]  They called it, the way they listed it, is amended document forwarded.
[01:09:19.520 --> 01:09:21.920]  Amended document forwarded.
[01:09:21.920 --> 01:09:37.200]  Yeah, under the case that these attorneys were doing criminal acts.
[01:09:37.200 --> 01:09:38.200]  You know what I mean?
[01:09:38.200 --> 01:09:41.360]  Who did you send it to?
[01:09:41.360 --> 01:09:42.920]  The judge in the case?
[01:09:42.920 --> 01:09:51.840]  Yeah, generally we sent it to US District Court, District Courthouse.
[01:09:51.840 --> 01:09:52.840]  So the...
[01:09:52.840 --> 01:09:56.240]  The process is the way I sent it.
[01:09:56.240 --> 01:09:57.240]  Okay.
[01:09:57.240 --> 01:10:01.600]  Now you need to file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge.
[01:10:01.600 --> 01:10:06.800]  I think he forgot that he is a magistrate.
[01:10:06.800 --> 01:10:11.920]  We haven't gotten that key with the magistrates down there.
[01:10:11.920 --> 01:10:16.040]  He has a duty to hold a preliminary hearing based on your complaint.
[01:10:16.040 --> 01:10:23.640]  If it was a verified criminal affidavit, that is not part of a civil case.
[01:10:23.640 --> 01:10:27.840]  That is a whole different animal, and he knows that.
[01:10:27.840 --> 01:10:38.920]  Well, what I did is I sent it in a second time, but I sent it to the circuit upstairs,
[01:10:38.920 --> 01:10:48.720]  the US State Court, and I sent it to the circuit, and I put a note on there telling the circuit
[01:10:48.720 --> 01:10:54.880]  not to give it back to the guys downstairs, the US District Court, because I had already
[01:10:54.880 --> 01:11:02.280]  filed it, and they put it in with a case, an ongoing case, and they installed it at
[01:11:02.280 --> 01:11:07.280]  amended document number 40 on the docket list.
[01:11:07.280 --> 01:11:12.000]  I never got back from them again.
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:14.840]  That is nicely done.
[01:11:14.840 --> 01:11:23.120]  Now you need to contact the US attorney and find out when he's going to present your complaint
[01:11:23.120 --> 01:11:27.920]  to the local federal grand jury.
[01:11:27.920 --> 01:11:35.440]  So I need to file a complaint with the attorney general's office over there?
[01:11:35.440 --> 01:11:36.440]  Not yet.
[01:11:36.440 --> 01:11:37.440]  Not yet.
[01:11:37.440 --> 01:11:45.160]  There is a statute that says that if a federal employee has it made known to him that a crime
[01:11:45.160 --> 01:11:52.600]  has been committed by another federal employee, that they are to give notice to the US attorney
[01:11:52.600 --> 01:11:55.920]  general in DC.
[01:11:55.920 --> 01:11:59.040]  That's kind of a whistleblower statute.
[01:11:59.040 --> 01:12:09.180]  So based on that, if you send a complaint to the US attorney and he doesn't give notice
[01:12:09.180 --> 01:12:17.000]  to the grand jury, then send a complaint against the US attorney for shielding from prosecution
[01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:28.800]  to the US attorney in DC, that'll get his attention, because you know what every US
[01:12:28.800 --> 01:12:32.440]  attorney has to do when a new president takes office.
[01:12:32.440 --> 01:12:36.960]  I go to the Senate and I resign.
[01:12:36.960 --> 01:12:37.960]  Exactly.
[01:12:37.960 --> 01:12:45.600]  So they got his resignation, and they're not going to want to throw him out unless he's
[01:12:45.600 --> 01:12:54.120]  been a problem, but this makes him look like a problem, so this should get the US attorney's
[01:12:54.120 --> 01:12:55.120]  attention.
[01:12:55.120 --> 01:13:02.000]  So I'll give it to the US attorney.
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:03.000]  Better than me.
[01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:05.520]  It's better than cutting your grass.
[01:13:05.520 --> 01:13:17.640]  For those of you who don't know, he had a case in the Fed remanded on appeal because
[01:13:17.640 --> 01:13:24.920]  he accused the grass police of trespassing on his property to take pictures of his grass.
[01:13:24.920 --> 01:13:29.160]  And the court turned it down and the court of appeals overturned it and sent it back.
[01:13:29.160 --> 01:13:30.160]  I love it.
[01:13:30.160 --> 01:13:33.480]  So he's our hero.
[01:13:33.480 --> 01:13:36.720]  He's the one with the grass police ruling.
[01:13:36.720 --> 01:13:41.080]  That was ruled in the circuit, so it's law.
[01:13:41.080 --> 01:13:43.640]  Everybody else can use it.
[01:13:43.640 --> 01:13:46.840]  I guess you read through that, didn't you?
[01:13:46.840 --> 01:13:50.160]  Yeah, I did.
[01:13:50.160 --> 01:13:53.440]  That's the thing I like about the federal appeals court.
[01:13:53.440 --> 01:13:59.520]  The trial courts are just as corrupt as everything else, but the appellate court, you always
[01:13:59.520 --> 01:14:05.720]  want to ask a question that they don't want to have to answer.
[01:14:05.720 --> 01:14:12.120]  And Jerry says in this appeal, saying that these guys trespassed on my property, he owed
[01:14:12.120 --> 01:14:16.520]  him off his property, he had no trespassing signs, and they trespassed on his property
[01:14:16.520 --> 01:14:19.240]  so they could collect evidence to use against him.
[01:14:19.240 --> 01:14:22.840]  And he filed criminally against them for that.
[01:14:22.840 --> 01:14:29.720]  And the court tossed it and he appealed it and they remanded it, the court of appeals
[01:14:29.720 --> 01:14:39.040]  remanded it back because if they didn't, they would gut the trespass laws.
[01:14:39.040 --> 01:14:43.560]  They would eviscerate them and nobody would have to pay attention to them.
[01:14:43.560 --> 01:14:47.480]  That's the kind of questions you always want to ask.
[01:14:47.480 --> 01:14:52.240]  The kind of questions they don't want to give you an answer to.
[01:14:52.240 --> 01:15:00.080]  We did that on a city ordinance issue and they gave us our, they dismissed the case,
[01:15:00.080 --> 01:15:04.760]  but on a different issue so they did not have to address the one we brought before them.
[01:15:04.760 --> 01:15:09.200]  You always want to be looking for questions that they don't want to answer.
[01:15:09.200 --> 01:15:11.240]  Anyway, I interrupted you.
[01:15:11.240 --> 01:15:12.840]  Oh, yeah.
[01:15:12.840 --> 01:15:16.320]  Well, that's how I'll do that.
[01:15:16.320 --> 01:15:24.800]  I did this once before when I first got started with this, but I don't know whatever happened
[01:15:24.800 --> 01:15:25.800]  to it.
[01:15:25.800 --> 01:15:31.400]  I know I got the packet back from the D.C. Attorney General's office.
[01:15:31.400 --> 01:15:38.320]  They said they couldn't find the office down there, so I don't know, I used the one off
[01:15:38.320 --> 01:15:39.320]  the internet.
[01:15:39.320 --> 01:15:43.680]  So I guess I'll have to look that back up again, so.
[01:15:43.680 --> 01:15:47.920]  Well, I'm looking forward, frankly, to getting in the Fed.
[01:15:47.920 --> 01:15:52.960]  I'm walking these guys in Victoria County through the state issues, but I'm looking
[01:15:52.960 --> 01:15:58.520]  forward to get to the Fed because the Fed will give me all the case law I need.
[01:15:58.520 --> 01:16:02.480]  They'll do my legal research for me.
[01:16:02.480 --> 01:16:07.920]  When I get those, when I get a ruling, you know, they're going to rule against me almost
[01:16:07.920 --> 01:16:12.480]  every time, but they're going to tell me what's wrong and give me good case law on how to
[01:16:12.480 --> 01:16:13.840]  fix it.
[01:16:13.840 --> 01:16:18.960]  So when I come back to them, the case I'm really after, I've already got all my homework
[01:16:18.960 --> 01:16:21.640]  done and they did it for me.
[01:16:21.640 --> 01:16:22.640]  Yeah.
[01:16:22.640 --> 01:16:23.640]  Okay.
[01:16:23.640 --> 01:16:27.080]  Do you have anything else for us, Jerry?
[01:16:27.080 --> 01:16:33.480]  Oh, can I ask you about this Hector V. Humphrey?
[01:16:33.480 --> 01:16:35.200]  I don't know whether you're familiar with that.
[01:16:35.200 --> 01:16:36.200]  Oh, heck yeah.
[01:16:36.200 --> 01:16:37.200]  Heck V. Humphrey.
[01:16:37.200 --> 01:16:38.200]  Yeah.
[01:16:38.200 --> 01:16:43.360]  The apparent threat is I'm not, but we're about to go to our sponsors, so that's why
[01:16:43.360 --> 01:16:45.840]  I was checking to pick this up on the other side.
[01:16:45.840 --> 01:16:50.400]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Root of Our Radio.
[01:16:50.400 --> 01:16:54.320]  I guess my wine didn't work because we've got a full board of callers.
[01:16:54.320 --> 01:16:55.320]  Hang on.
[01:16:55.320 --> 01:17:00.200]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.200 --> 01:17:04.920]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:04.920 --> 01:17:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:13.320]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[01:17:13.320 --> 01:17:14.640]  can win too.
[01:17:14.640 --> 01:17:19.240]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:17:19.240 --> 01:17:24.920]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:17:24.920 --> 01:17:29.560]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:17:29.560 --> 01:17:33.760]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:33.760 --> 01:17:38.880]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.880 --> 01:17:40.800]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.800 --> 01:17:46.560]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:17:46.560 --> 01:17:49.560]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.560 --> 01:17:58.520]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[01:17:58.520 --> 01:18:00.240]  collectors now.
[01:18:00.240 --> 01:18:01.240]  I love logos.
[01:18:01.240 --> 01:18:04.520]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.520 --> 01:18:07.400]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.400 --> 01:18:08.680]  I need my truth pick.
[01:18:08.680 --> 01:18:13.320]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.320 --> 01:18:17.080]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't
[01:18:17.080 --> 01:18:20.480]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.480 --> 01:18:21.960]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:21.960 --> 01:18:24.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:28.440]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos by ordering your supplies or
[01:18:28.440 --> 01:18:29.440]  holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.440 --> 01:18:31.480]  The first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.480 --> 01:18:37.680]  Now, go to logosradio.network.com, tick on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.680 --> 01:18:43.520]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.520 --> 01:18:44.520]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.520 --> 01:18:45.520]  No.
[01:18:45.520 --> 01:18:47.080]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.080 --> 01:18:48.080]  No.
[01:18:48.080 --> 01:18:49.080]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.080 --> 01:18:50.080]  No.
[01:18:50.080 --> 01:18:51.080]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.080 --> 01:18:52.080]  Wow.
[01:18:52.080 --> 01:18:55.960]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:18:55.960 --> 01:18:56.960]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.960 --> 01:18:57.960]  You're welcome.
[01:18:57.960 --> 01:18:59.960]  Happy Holidays, Logos.
[01:19:27.960 --> 01:19:45.240]  I was blindsided, but now I can see your plans You put the beer in my pocket, took the money
[01:19:45.240 --> 01:19:50.120]  from my hand Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick
[01:19:50.120 --> 01:19:51.120]  again
[01:19:51.120 --> 01:20:10.120]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick Again, ain't gonna fool me with that same old
[01:20:10.120 --> 01:20:11.120]  trick
[01:20:11.120 --> 01:20:12.120]  Okay.
[01:20:12.120 --> 01:20:13.120]  We are back.
[01:20:13.120 --> 01:20:17.120]  Randy Kelton with Fountainville Radio and we're talking to Jerry in Pennsylvania.
[01:20:17.120 --> 01:20:20.120]  Oh, got you unmuted.
[01:20:20.120 --> 01:20:21.120]  Okay.
[01:20:21.120 --> 01:20:22.120]  Jerry, you had another question.
[01:20:22.120 --> 01:20:23.120]  Yeah.
[01:20:23.120 --> 01:20:32.120]  On this HECME Humphrey, they've been sending us references back to me the past few times
[01:20:32.120 --> 01:20:33.120]  from the U.S. Circuit.
[01:20:33.120 --> 01:20:37.360]  So I thought, well, I'll check with you while I got you here.
[01:20:37.360 --> 01:20:38.960]  It says here...
[01:20:38.960 --> 01:20:41.240]  I don't recognize HECME Humphrey.
[01:20:41.240 --> 01:20:42.240]  Can you give me a brief?
[01:20:42.240 --> 01:20:43.240]  Oh, yeah.
[01:20:43.240 --> 01:20:44.240]  That's what I'm going to do now.
[01:20:44.240 --> 01:20:45.240]  It's a short one there.
[01:20:45.240 --> 01:20:53.760]  It says here that prisoner challenges conviction...
[01:20:53.760 --> 01:21:00.800]  The court answers the question in the negative in Hector versus Humphrey.
[01:21:00.800 --> 01:21:06.880]  It says here that the conviction tends reversed on appeal.
[01:21:06.880 --> 01:21:18.560]  They want it reversed on appeal, I guess, before he can plow his unconstitutional incarceration
[01:21:18.560 --> 01:21:19.560]  again.
[01:21:19.560 --> 01:21:25.040]  Otherwise invalid before a 1983 claim can process.
[01:21:25.040 --> 01:21:31.080]  Fellow judges here in 1983 claim must determine whether a judgment in favor of the plaintiff
[01:21:31.080 --> 01:21:37.400]  would necessarily imply the validity of his conviction or sentence if the complaint must
[01:21:37.400 --> 01:21:43.200]  be dismissed unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the conviction or sentence has already
[01:21:43.200 --> 01:21:44.680]  been invalid.
[01:21:44.680 --> 01:21:54.560]  Now it says the lower courts have divided...
[01:21:54.560 --> 01:22:01.560]  The courts have ruled that a prisoner who is willfully in custody and is otherwise ineligible
[01:22:01.560 --> 01:22:10.400]  for habeas corpus to flee must comply with Hector Humphrey, but a sizable minority permits
[01:22:10.400 --> 01:22:16.320]  all prisoners ineligible for habeas corpus with damages under 1983.
[01:22:16.320 --> 01:22:25.600]  Now the thing is that if you can prove that let's say they violated the Fourth Amendment
[01:22:25.600 --> 01:22:33.760]  or maybe the Fifth Amendment, would that supersede this or how, in your opinion, how would this
[01:22:33.760 --> 01:22:36.080]  or can it be overturned?
[01:22:36.080 --> 01:22:38.080]  You know what I'm saying?
[01:22:38.080 --> 01:22:39.840]  Brett, can you answer that?
[01:22:39.840 --> 01:22:44.320]  I'm not familiar enough with the case to speak to it.
[01:22:44.320 --> 01:22:55.280]  Well, so the case was the person who was in jail was attacking the conviction and he was
[01:22:55.280 --> 01:23:04.880]  trying to get 1983 relief and he...
[01:23:04.880 --> 01:23:07.960]  So the Seventh Circuit said that...
[01:23:07.960 --> 01:23:12.000]  Wait, wait, quick question.
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:16.560]  He was trying to get 1983 release.
[01:23:16.560 --> 01:23:24.720]  Was it in the face of a valid conviction or was the conviction somehow challenged?
[01:23:24.720 --> 01:23:33.760]  He was challenging the conviction in his 1983 suit and the Seventh Circuit was saying that
[01:23:33.760 --> 01:23:42.560]  Heck needed to exhaust all of his state remedies like regular appeal or going through the processes
[01:23:42.560 --> 01:23:54.640]  of having a certain conviction overturned in the state before he could seek this 1983 relief.
[01:23:54.640 --> 01:23:59.600]  And that's exactly what I would have expected.
[01:23:59.600 --> 01:24:05.480]  So right now, the reason that Heck v. Humphrey stood out to me is because I've got a federal
[01:24:05.480 --> 01:24:15.760]  lawsuit right now where I am suing a lawyer who committed quite a string of aggravated
[01:24:15.760 --> 01:24:17.560]  perjury.
[01:24:17.560 --> 01:24:27.360]  And it so happens that the context in which he uttered these lies was in a traffic case.
[01:24:27.360 --> 01:24:33.360]  And his lawyers that he hired to defend himself in federal court, his lawyers came up with
[01:24:33.360 --> 01:24:39.040]  this Heck v. Humphrey as if it were going to be a defense, as if I'm challenging the
[01:24:39.040 --> 01:24:44.200]  traffic ticket and saying, oh, I need to get my speeding ticket overturned.
[01:24:44.200 --> 01:24:48.560]  That's not what I'm doing, but that would have been, if I were, that would have been
[01:24:48.560 --> 01:24:54.240]  a defense for it because I'm not trying to get the feds to go talk to the JP and have
[01:24:54.240 --> 01:24:56.960]  it reversed or something.
[01:24:56.960 --> 01:25:03.080]  That would be inappropriate because I need to go through all the state remedies first.
[01:25:03.080 --> 01:25:07.840]  And okay, if I got this right, I think you said something about this earlier that they
[01:25:07.840 --> 01:25:18.000]  were claiming the privilege, the lawyer privilege like in Tina's case.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:19.000]  Oh yeah.
[01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:23.360]  They also want to do absolute immunity, right?
[01:25:23.360 --> 01:25:32.880]  So if he's a lawyer, he gets to lie his seat off.
[01:25:32.880 --> 01:25:35.520]  Okay.
[01:25:35.520 --> 01:25:36.520]  This is in Texas?
[01:25:36.520 --> 01:25:37.520]  Yeah.
[01:25:37.520 --> 01:25:45.200]  Well, the speeding ticket's in Texas and this lawsuit is in the Fed, but yeah, it's in the
[01:25:45.200 --> 01:25:48.160]  Eastern District of Texas.
[01:25:48.160 --> 01:25:56.520]  Do we have the attorney privilege in Texas law?
[01:25:56.520 --> 01:25:58.400]  What do you mean, attorney privilege?
[01:25:58.400 --> 01:25:59.920]  How far would that scope go?
[01:25:59.920 --> 01:26:00.920]  Commit crimes?
[01:26:00.920 --> 01:26:01.920]  Tina?
[01:26:01.920 --> 01:26:02.920]  Are you there?
[01:26:02.920 --> 01:26:03.920]  Yeah.
[01:26:03.920 --> 01:26:08.920]  That didn't sound like Tina.
[01:26:08.920 --> 01:26:13.280]  Look, there you go.
[01:26:13.280 --> 01:26:14.760]  Talk to us about that.
[01:26:14.760 --> 01:26:21.560]  Now, in your case, they asserted it in the state, correct?
[01:26:21.560 --> 01:26:22.560]  Yes.
[01:26:22.560 --> 01:26:24.560]  Hey, Tina.
[01:26:24.560 --> 01:26:25.560]  Hey.
[01:26:25.560 --> 01:26:35.440]  I know all about this attorney privilege, it's called absolute litigation privilege,
[01:26:35.440 --> 01:26:39.960]  which means they can lie, commit murder, anything they want to do as long as it's related to
[01:26:39.960 --> 01:26:44.600]  a case.
[01:26:44.600 --> 01:26:47.840]  But that's in California law.
[01:26:47.840 --> 01:26:48.840]  Yes.
[01:26:48.840 --> 01:26:53.360]  Brett, have you ever seen that in Texas law?
[01:26:53.360 --> 01:26:54.360]  No.
[01:26:54.360 --> 01:27:01.440]  Most states have litigation privilege, they do not have absolute litigation privilege.
[01:27:01.440 --> 01:27:11.640]  Florida has litigation privilege laws, a lot of states do, but not absolute.
[01:27:11.640 --> 01:27:19.000]  Does the state have the power to indemnify someone from the commission of crimes?
[01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:25.680]  That sounds like one of those questions that you put before the appeals court that they
[01:27:25.680 --> 01:27:28.680]  don't want to answer.
[01:27:28.680 --> 01:27:29.840]  Yes.
[01:27:29.840 --> 01:27:33.000]  That's what this sounds like.
[01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:42.400]  When I sued this JP, that was my claim, that he committed a crime in office and he can't
[01:27:42.400 --> 01:27:50.440]  claim immunity for committing crimes within scope.
[01:27:50.440 --> 01:27:58.080]  So the attorneys can hardly claim that the commission of crimes is within the scope of
[01:27:58.080 --> 01:28:05.960]  their representation, and I think that's in the bar standards.
[01:28:05.960 --> 01:28:07.600]  There's reference to that.
[01:28:07.600 --> 01:28:08.600]  Yeah.
[01:28:08.600 --> 01:28:18.000]  Well, for me, this Heck v Humphrey and the absolute prosecutorial immunity are also invalid
[01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:26.400]  for one other reason, which is the guy who was prosecuting or purporting to prosecute
[01:28:26.400 --> 01:28:29.400]  is not an authorized individual.
[01:28:29.400 --> 01:28:34.760]  That's another thing he happened to be lying about.
[01:28:34.760 --> 01:28:39.200]  So even if somebody might have prosecutorial immunity, he doesn't.
[01:28:39.200 --> 01:28:43.800]  He was just faking that he was the prosecutor.
[01:28:43.800 --> 01:28:55.960]  That is really odd how he picked up that position without being appointed to that position.
[01:28:55.960 --> 01:29:08.040]  But back to Jerry's question, Jerry, why did you address this particular case?
[01:29:08.040 --> 01:29:23.960]  Because I got that judgment from them and the criminal trial was never brought out of
[01:29:23.960 --> 01:29:29.920]  the state court and put into the federal court yet.
[01:29:29.920 --> 01:29:30.920]  I never got that far.
[01:29:30.920 --> 01:29:31.920]  I got as far as the state.
[01:29:31.920 --> 01:29:32.920]  The state turned me down.
[01:29:32.920 --> 01:29:33.920]  Did the state turn down your appeal?
[01:29:33.920 --> 01:29:34.920]  They dismissed it.
[01:29:34.920 --> 01:29:35.920]  Oh, okay.
[01:29:35.920 --> 01:29:36.920]  Then you were done.
[01:29:36.920 --> 01:29:37.920]  So that wouldn't apply to you.
[01:29:37.920 --> 01:29:40.920]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Google Law Radio, you'll be right back.
[01:29:40.920 --> 01:30:05.720]  Sorry, soft drink lovers, even diet drinks can make you fat.
[01:30:05.720 --> 01:30:17.280]  I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas.
[01:30:17.280 --> 01:30:18.880]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.880 --> 01:30:22.480]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.480 --> 01:30:27.240]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.240 --> 01:30:32.320]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.320 --> 01:30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:39.300]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:30:39.300 --> 01:30:42.840]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.840 --> 01:30:46.360]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.360 --> 01:30:50.400]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right?
[01:30:50.400 --> 01:30:51.400]  Wrong.
[01:30:51.400 --> 01:30:56.040]  Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade.
[01:30:56.040 --> 01:31:01.040]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more
[01:31:01.040 --> 01:31:02.800]  than no soda at all.
[01:31:02.800 --> 01:31:07.560]  And studies authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike regular sugars,
[01:31:07.560 --> 01:31:09.760]  don't deliver anything to squelch it.
[01:31:09.760 --> 01:31:14.240]  Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger
[01:31:14.240 --> 01:31:15.840]  overall calorie intake.
[01:31:15.840 --> 01:31:20.520]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight, and if you need to shed some pounds,
[01:31:20.520 --> 01:31:23.760]  avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead.
[01:31:23.760 --> 01:31:25.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:25.760 --> 01:31:30.560]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.560 --> 01:31:35.920]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:35.920 --> 01:31:38.160]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.160 --> 01:31:42.960]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:42.960 --> 01:31:45.640]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:45.640 --> 01:31:48.400]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.400 --> 01:31:49.800]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:49.800 --> 01:31:50.800]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:50.800 --> 01:31:52.240]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.240 --> 01:31:53.240]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.240 --> 01:31:54.840]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:54.840 --> 01:31:57.520]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.520 --> 01:32:00.720]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.720 --> 01:32:04.920]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[01:32:04.920 --> 01:32:08.720]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going
[01:32:08.720 --> 01:32:12.400]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:12.400 --> 01:32:15.880]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:32:15.880 --> 01:32:19.600]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:19.600 --> 01:32:23.760]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:32:23.760 --> 01:32:25.240]  our rights through due process.
[01:32:25.240 --> 01:32:29.120]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[01:32:29.120 --> 01:32:32.880]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:32:32.880 --> 01:32:35.280]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.280 --> 01:32:39.280]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:32:39.280 --> 01:32:40.600]  ordering your copy today.
[01:32:40.600 --> 01:32:43.960]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:43.960 --> 01:32:48.360]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[01:32:48.360 --> 01:32:50.680]  documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:50.680 --> 01:32:54.640]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:54.640 --> 01:33:01.640]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:24.640 --> 01:33:50.880]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, West Fountain Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Jerry
[01:33:50.880 --> 01:33:57.080]  and Tina, talking about litigation privilege.
[01:33:57.080 --> 01:33:58.080]  Okay.
[01:33:58.080 --> 01:34:08.160]  You know, you guys, I just looked up something that says in Texas Supreme Court, that correct
[01:34:08.160 --> 01:34:09.160] ...
[01:34:09.160 --> 01:34:10.160]  Hold on, hold on, Tina.
[01:34:10.160 --> 01:34:11.160]  You sound real muffled.
[01:34:11.160 --> 01:34:13.040]  Are you on a headset or something?
[01:34:13.040 --> 01:34:14.040]  No, no.
[01:34:14.040 --> 01:34:15.040]  I'm on speakerphone.
[01:34:15.040 --> 01:34:16.040]  Oh, my goodness.
[01:34:16.040 --> 01:34:23.640]  He's just being childish, don't worry about it.
[01:34:23.640 --> 01:34:25.640]  Did you hear that?
[01:34:25.640 --> 01:34:26.640]  Yes.
[01:34:26.640 --> 01:34:27.640]  I did.
[01:34:27.640 --> 01:34:32.320]  He's on speakerphone, yeah.
[01:34:32.320 --> 01:34:42.600]  The Texas Supreme Court set parameters on attorney immunity privilege, August 6th, 2021,
[01:34:42.600 --> 01:34:53.520]  and they kept the decision in the Landrys Inc. et al. versus Animal League Defense Fund.
[01:34:53.520 --> 01:35:00.320]  So, you guys have got better protections than California has.
[01:35:00.320 --> 01:35:02.760]  Good.
[01:35:02.760 --> 01:35:05.400]  Can you email that case to me?
[01:35:05.400 --> 01:35:09.480]  That's not saying much, better than California has.
[01:35:09.480 --> 01:35:13.000]  I still don't... That doesn't make me feel too comfortable.
[01:35:13.000 --> 01:35:16.240]  Yeah, California doesn't have any.
[01:35:16.240 --> 01:35:17.240]  We don't have any.
[01:35:17.240 --> 01:35:23.920]  We literally... I will send you the California one, Brett, it's appalling, and I really need
[01:35:23.920 --> 01:35:30.360]  to find time, like Randy says, to take that to the feds because, you know, they have this
[01:35:30.360 --> 01:35:35.920]  litigation privilege, which really appears to only apply to attorneys, although it doesn't
[01:35:35.920 --> 01:35:38.160]  specifically state that.
[01:35:38.160 --> 01:35:44.280]  But our constitution, our state constitution says there cannot be a privilege afforded
[01:35:44.280 --> 01:35:46.400]  to one party over another.
[01:35:46.400 --> 01:35:52.040]  Well, that's just what they're doing with a litigation privilege, afforded a privilege
[01:35:52.040 --> 01:35:54.000]  to one party over another.
[01:35:54.000 --> 01:35:59.440]  Well, maybe you had the right to lie, cheat, steal, and murder, and you just didn't happen
[01:35:59.440 --> 01:36:01.440]  to take advantage of it.
[01:36:01.440 --> 01:36:04.960]  Yeah, I guess not.
[01:36:04.960 --> 01:36:11.080]  The banks did, the bank's attorneys did, but, you know, and that's what they pull on us
[01:36:11.080 --> 01:36:12.080]  all the time.
[01:36:12.080 --> 01:36:16.760]  If they lie to us, like they did to me, and deliberately lie, they just said, oh, it was
[01:36:16.760 --> 01:36:20.680]  in the concept of litigation, so we have litigation privilege.
[01:36:20.680 --> 01:36:25.760]  We can do whatever we want, and the courts appalled it.
[01:36:25.760 --> 01:36:29.400]  Well, let's see.
[01:36:29.400 --> 01:36:32.760]  You're pushing your way toward the fed with that, aren't you?
[01:36:32.760 --> 01:36:40.280]  Well, when I find time to write up the suit for the feds, yes, I will absolutely go there.
[01:36:40.280 --> 01:36:45.840]  I'm focusing on my appeal and going after the court clerks for trying to deny me access
[01:36:45.840 --> 01:36:48.480]  to the court.
[01:36:48.480 --> 01:36:55.360]  And I've also got my other case with and against the Timeless Treasures, the confinement store,
[01:36:55.360 --> 01:36:58.040]  which that's what I wanted to talk about tonight.
[01:36:58.040 --> 01:36:59.640]  Okay, hang on.
[01:36:59.640 --> 01:37:01.240]  Let's finish up with Jerry.
[01:37:01.240 --> 01:37:02.240]  Yes.
[01:37:02.240 --> 01:37:03.240]  I muted you.
[01:37:03.240 --> 01:37:04.240]  Okay.
[01:37:04.240 --> 01:37:05.240]  You still there, Jerry?
[01:37:05.240 --> 01:37:06.240]  Oh, yeah.
[01:37:06.240 --> 01:37:14.160]  I just want to know if I can use this against them, because they're trying to, you know,
[01:37:14.160 --> 01:37:23.120]  use it against me, because it's like the last couple of lines here say that the complaintant
[01:37:23.120 --> 01:37:30.520]  act must be dismissed unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the conviction or sentence
[01:37:30.520 --> 01:37:33.560]  has already been invalidated.
[01:37:33.560 --> 01:37:41.320]  So it's like you said earlier, if you use the subject matter of jurisdiction, they never
[01:37:41.320 --> 01:37:49.320]  validated the case at the county level, right?
[01:37:49.320 --> 01:37:50.320]  Validated the case?
[01:37:50.320 --> 01:37:54.640]  It means they have no jurisdiction from the beginning.
[01:37:54.640 --> 01:38:01.200]  It's just ultra various from the very beginning, so.
[01:38:01.200 --> 01:38:06.520]  Did you read this Hector Humphrey thing, Brett, for this interview or not?
[01:38:06.520 --> 01:38:07.520]  I did.
[01:38:07.520 --> 01:38:08.520]  Oh.
[01:38:08.520 --> 01:38:09.520]  No, that's...
[01:38:09.520 --> 01:38:12.560]  It was, yeah, a few weeks ago, but yeah.
[01:38:12.560 --> 01:38:18.520]  No, what caught me was the first paragraph, right there it says in the first paragraph
[01:38:18.520 --> 01:38:29.440]  that he is trying to file a constitutional complaint, nothing about the murder.
[01:38:29.440 --> 01:38:34.600]  I think he was in the murder.
[01:38:34.600 --> 01:38:39.480]  So in other words, I go to court and I murder somebody, and then I come back and say, well,
[01:38:39.480 --> 01:38:42.120]  they didn't have no subject matter of jurisdiction.
[01:38:42.120 --> 01:38:46.160]  They didn't have no, you know, something like that.
[01:38:46.160 --> 01:38:52.440]  And I throw a 1983, wow, complaint against them.
[01:38:52.440 --> 01:38:57.840]  Is that what they're trying to say in the Hector Humphrey?
[01:38:57.840 --> 01:39:06.800]  What I'm gathering from it is that you can't go to the Fed and ask the Fed to look at a
[01:39:06.800 --> 01:39:14.840]  conviction that was in the state if that conviction hasn't been addressed in some other way, like
[01:39:14.840 --> 01:39:23.440]  it was shown, you know, it was demonstrated to be an invalid conviction.
[01:39:23.440 --> 01:39:28.080]  You can't get this there through a 1983 suit.
[01:39:28.080 --> 01:39:29.080]  This would go to the Hector Films.
[01:39:29.080 --> 01:39:30.080]  That's what Randy said a few times.
[01:39:30.080 --> 01:39:31.080]  Yeah.
[01:39:31.080 --> 01:39:32.080]  It's kind of like that, yeah.
[01:39:32.080 --> 01:39:37.040]  All right, Randy, you can't take anything to the Fed unless it's been a final adjudication
[01:39:37.040 --> 01:39:39.320]  in the state, right?
[01:39:39.320 --> 01:39:44.200]  Well, you can't ask the Fed to interfere with the state action.
[01:39:44.200 --> 01:39:45.200]  Right.
[01:39:45.200 --> 01:39:52.560]  So if a case is still being adjudicated in the state, the Fed has no power to interfere
[01:39:52.560 --> 01:39:54.760]  with that.
[01:39:54.760 --> 01:40:02.240]  Once they've issued a final judgment, then the federal court can look at it and determine
[01:40:02.240 --> 01:40:08.040]  whether or not the final judgment amounted to a federal constitutional violation.
[01:40:08.040 --> 01:40:11.080]  Yeah, that's right.
[01:40:11.080 --> 01:40:15.000]  So that's what they're saying, it's not right.
[01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:18.440]  Okay.
[01:40:18.440 --> 01:40:26.120]  Or another way to look at that is if he's in the Fed trying to get damages via a 1983
[01:40:26.120 --> 01:40:33.320]  suit, damages for the conviction in the state being unconstitutional, then he has to base
[01:40:33.320 --> 01:40:42.000]  that in the Fed, he has to base that 1983 suit on the reversal or invalidation of that
[01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:43.000]  state conviction.
[01:40:43.000 --> 01:40:52.680]  Yes, and a final determination on the reversal.
[01:40:52.680 --> 01:40:55.680]  That makes it not right.
[01:40:55.680 --> 01:40:56.680]  Right.
[01:40:56.680 --> 01:40:57.680]  Okay.
[01:40:57.680 --> 01:41:01.880]  I'll let you go on this one.
[01:41:01.880 --> 01:41:02.880]  Okay.
[01:41:02.880 --> 01:41:03.880]  Thank you, Jerry.
[01:41:03.880 --> 01:41:04.880]  All right.
[01:41:04.880 --> 01:41:05.880]  Thanks, Randy.
[01:41:05.880 --> 01:41:06.880]  Thanks, Brett.
[01:41:06.880 --> 01:41:07.880]  Okay.
[01:41:07.880 --> 01:41:10.080]  Now we're going to Ms. Tina.
[01:41:10.080 --> 01:41:11.080]  Okay.
[01:41:11.080 --> 01:41:12.080]  Tina, you're on.
[01:41:12.080 --> 01:41:13.080]  Hi.
[01:41:13.080 --> 01:41:23.560]  A couple of things tonight, one, an update on my case, and it's an adversarial proceeding
[01:41:23.560 --> 01:41:33.240]  within a bankruptcy for the parties that took our property in consignment and never paid
[01:41:33.240 --> 01:41:41.600]  it, and, you know, sold it, and then filed bankruptcy to attempt to discharge $360,000
[01:41:41.600 --> 01:41:42.600]  in debt.
[01:41:42.600 --> 01:41:49.800]  I filed an adversary proceeding, it's been going on for three years now, but it has stopped
[01:41:49.800 --> 01:41:53.200]  her getting her bankruptcy.
[01:41:53.200 --> 01:42:02.960]  She has got a criminal case against her with the state here in Sloan, and we had a hearing
[01:42:02.960 --> 01:42:13.640]  just on Wednesday, and she came flat out and lied to the judge and said, oh, you know,
[01:42:13.640 --> 01:42:22.840]  my attorneys have filed a 500-page motion to dismiss the criminal case, and I feel confident
[01:42:22.840 --> 01:42:27.520]  I'm going to be exonerated, and I'm not going to settle with these people, because the judge
[01:42:27.520 --> 01:42:34.240]  had said, why aren't you settling, this is kind of ridiculous, and she said, they refuse
[01:42:34.240 --> 01:42:41.480]  to settle, which is a flat-out lie, and we have the emails to prove it, and then she
[01:42:41.480 --> 01:42:43.400]  said, well, I'm not willing to settle.
[01:42:43.400 --> 01:42:45.800]  I want to clear my good name.
[01:42:45.800 --> 01:42:51.400]  This is the person who has 70-odd complaints with the DA's office, and she thinks she
[01:42:51.400 --> 01:42:58.560]  has a good name to clear, and so then she said, one of our plaintiffs, you know, because
[01:42:58.560 --> 01:43:05.480]  I added three more to my case, that he was dropped from the criminal case.
[01:43:05.480 --> 01:43:12.040]  Well, no, he wasn't, he has a part of the bad check case, the felony bad check case
[01:43:12.040 --> 01:43:13.040]  against her.
[01:43:13.040 --> 01:43:19.760]  She has two of those, two misdemeanor bad checks and 12 counsel embezzlement, and he's
[01:43:19.760 --> 01:43:25.720]  part of two of those, and so we called the DA's office today to find out if there really
[01:43:25.720 --> 01:43:34.200]  was a 500-page motion to dismiss, and no, there's a 13-page one, and the other party
[01:43:34.200 --> 01:43:38.200]  has not been dismissed, and I'm not going to be run off the cliff, Randy, it's your
[01:43:38.200 --> 01:43:39.200]  fault.
[01:43:39.200 --> 01:43:52.760]  You're going to ruin all my fun, okay, Randy Kelton, Rue La Blah Radio, we'll be right
[01:43:52.760 --> 01:43:53.760]  back.
[01:43:53.760 --> 01:44:00.560]  Watch this, you're not going to run off the cliff either.
[01:44:00.560 --> 01:44:05.760]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:44:05.760 --> 01:44:06.760]  of nutrition.
[01:44:06.760 --> 01:44:11.360]  We feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.360 --> 01:44:17.080]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.080 --> 01:44:23.400]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevity can
[01:44:23.400 --> 01:44:25.560]  provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.560 --> 01:44:30.480]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[01:44:30.480 --> 01:44:31.480]  we reject.
[01:44:31.480 --> 01:44:36.880]  But we have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[01:44:36.880 --> 01:44:39.720]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.720 --> 01:44:46.080]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:44:46.080 --> 01:44:47.080]  quality radio.
[01:44:47.080 --> 01:44:51.600]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.600 --> 01:44:57.200]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:44:57.200 --> 01:44:58.200]  increase your income.
[01:44:58.200 --> 01:44:59.200]  Order now.
[01:44:59.200 --> 01:45:04.280]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.280 --> 01:45:11.040]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[01:45:11.040 --> 01:45:14.080]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.080 --> 01:45:18.840]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.840 --> 01:45:23.040]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.040 --> 01:45:28.760]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.760 --> 01:45:34.680]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.680 --> 01:45:39.240]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[01:45:39.240 --> 01:45:43.520]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.520 --> 01:45:49.680]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.680 --> 01:45:51.960]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.960 --> 01:45:56.160]  Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.160 --> 01:45:59.160]  Or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:27.160 --> 01:46:28.160]  How you got it?
[01:46:28.160 --> 01:46:29.160]  Come on, it's working.
[01:46:29.160 --> 01:46:30.160]  Come on.
[01:46:30.160 --> 01:46:31.160]  Sing, Jerry.
[01:46:31.160 --> 01:46:32.160]  Come on.
[01:46:32.160 --> 01:46:39.160]  As we sow, so shall we reap.
[01:46:39.160 --> 01:46:43.160]  So many fruits, so much to put on.
[01:46:43.160 --> 01:46:45.160]  Oh, what we see.
[01:46:45.160 --> 01:46:46.160]  Come on, come on, come on.
[01:46:46.160 --> 01:46:47.160]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:47.160 --> 01:46:51.160]  We hope you'll get an account for our videos.
[01:46:51.160 --> 01:46:56.160]  Hello.
[01:46:56.160 --> 01:46:59.160]  Okay.
[01:46:59.160 --> 01:47:02.160]  Okay.
[01:47:02.160 --> 01:47:09.160]  So I was talking about the hearing we had where the defendant lied.
[01:47:09.160 --> 01:47:16.160]  Her husband, who is a co-defendant, has never attended any hearings yet.
[01:47:16.160 --> 01:47:21.160]  I think the judge is getting a little PO'd at that.
[01:47:21.160 --> 01:47:31.160]  He did state that if any party does not attend the next hearing or the trial, they will be
[01:47:31.160 --> 01:47:37.160]  dismissed from the case and there will be, and if they're, like, it's the defendant,
[01:47:37.160 --> 01:47:42.160]  there will be a judgment rendered against them.
[01:47:42.160 --> 01:47:47.160]  So he was not in a good mood.
[01:47:47.160 --> 01:47:48.160]  Good.
[01:47:48.160 --> 01:47:55.160]  But, you know, he has never once attended any hearing, not even by Zoom.
[01:47:55.160 --> 01:47:58.160]  And he is a co-defendant.
[01:47:58.160 --> 01:48:02.160]  So anyway, she lied about all this stuff.
[01:48:02.160 --> 01:48:11.160]  We did read in the news today that her attorney has filed a motion to have the district attorney
[01:48:11.160 --> 01:48:17.160]  dismiss the case, but I don't see them dismissing the 12-count embezzlement case.
[01:48:17.160 --> 01:48:25.160]  But they did say that all attorneys, you know, who are defending criminals, always file that
[01:48:25.160 --> 01:48:26.160]  document.
[01:48:26.160 --> 01:48:29.160]  So we'll see what happens.
[01:48:29.160 --> 01:48:37.160]  They have a hearing on Monday about it, and we may be able to attend that one by Zoom.
[01:48:37.160 --> 01:48:42.160]  And the judge said, you know, we've got to do a pretrial order, got to go through all
[01:48:42.160 --> 01:48:47.160]  these steps by February, and then the trial is set for March the 8th.
[01:48:47.160 --> 01:48:54.160]  And I talked to an attorney at the Bankruptcy Health Clinic who's always actually been very
[01:48:54.160 --> 01:48:56.160]  good and very helpful.
[01:48:56.160 --> 01:49:04.160]  And, you know, he gave me some steps to take because he said she thinks she's hiring an
[01:49:04.160 --> 01:49:05.160]  attorney.
[01:49:05.160 --> 01:49:10.160]  He told the judge she was hiring an attorney because she couldn't do it herself.
[01:49:10.160 --> 01:49:17.160]  And it's interesting that the judge said, you know, we were willing to all settle for
[01:49:17.160 --> 01:49:18.160]  $50,000 combined.
[01:49:18.160 --> 01:49:21.160]  And he's like, this is absolutely ridiculous.
[01:49:21.160 --> 01:49:22.160]  You can't settle this.
[01:49:22.160 --> 01:49:25.160]  And she said, no, I'm not settling.
[01:49:25.160 --> 01:49:31.160]  And so I'm thinking that if she's hiring her seventh attorney, the judge is not going to
[01:49:31.160 --> 01:49:36.160]  be too happy about her spending all this money on that and not being willing to settle with
[01:49:36.160 --> 01:49:37.160]  the plaintiffs.
[01:49:37.160 --> 01:49:41.160]  Well, we've been willing to settle for half of what we asked for.
[01:49:41.160 --> 01:49:44.160]  It makes a lot of sense.
[01:49:44.160 --> 01:49:46.160]  It makes a lot of sense.
[01:49:46.160 --> 01:49:53.160]  But now I've got to figure out how to, I mean, I think I can research and read and plagiarize
[01:49:53.160 --> 01:49:55.160]  how to do a pretrial order.
[01:49:55.160 --> 01:49:59.160]  And he did give me some tips on that.
[01:49:59.160 --> 01:50:07.160]  But if on the slim chance she is able to find the money where she's in bankruptcy, so how
[01:50:07.160 --> 01:50:13.160]  is she finding the money to hire a criminal attorney and then an attorney to represent
[01:50:13.160 --> 01:50:20.160]  her at trial, which we've been told would be a minimum of $25,000 based on her history.
[01:50:20.160 --> 01:50:21.160]  Wow.
[01:50:21.160 --> 01:50:25.160]  That's a very special kind of bankruptcy.
[01:50:25.160 --> 01:50:33.160]  Well, it's an adversary proceeding and which in within a bankruptcy, it's like a regular
[01:50:33.160 --> 01:50:34.160]  court case.
[01:50:34.160 --> 01:50:36.160]  It's a regular trial.
[01:50:36.160 --> 01:50:43.160]  So, you know, they want their money to go through all the stuff from the other attorneys
[01:50:43.160 --> 01:50:48.160]  that she's had and through the bankruptcy and our adversary proceeding.
[01:50:48.160 --> 01:50:54.160]  And both our attorneys in the adversary proceeding both quit.
[01:50:54.160 --> 01:50:57.160]  One on grounds that she didn't follow instructions.
[01:50:57.160 --> 01:50:58.160]  She was combative.
[01:50:58.160 --> 01:51:01.160]  She wouldn't follow his advice.
[01:51:01.160 --> 01:51:03.160]  She wouldn't produce documents.
[01:51:03.160 --> 01:51:05.160]  And he was sick and tired of babysitting her.
[01:51:05.160 --> 01:51:07.160]  And that's what he put in the court.
[01:51:07.160 --> 01:51:08.160]  And she owed him money.
[01:51:08.160 --> 01:51:15.160]  And the second one where we had negotiated a settlement, which the plaintiff's Rene done,
[01:51:15.160 --> 01:51:17.160]  she quit right after that.
[01:51:17.160 --> 01:51:22.160]  And she wouldn't give reasons citing, you know, a $25,000 privilege, but she had an
[01:51:22.160 --> 01:51:29.160]  in-camera hearing with the judge to explain her reasoning.
[01:51:29.160 --> 01:51:33.160]  So we're hoping that, you know, it looks good.
[01:51:33.160 --> 01:51:40.160]  But I've just got to figure out how to present a trial now and how to present just the facts
[01:51:40.160 --> 01:51:46.160]  that we can prove and how to do it effectively and how to object to any attorney that comes
[01:51:46.160 --> 01:51:50.160]  along because they're not a witness, right?
[01:51:50.160 --> 01:51:54.160]  They're just spouting what she tells them to spout.
[01:51:54.160 --> 01:51:58.160]  But how do I block what they say?
[01:51:58.160 --> 01:52:00.160]  Because I don't know the law like they do.
[01:52:00.160 --> 01:52:05.160]  And I don't know how to do all the objections and all that kind of thing.
[01:52:05.160 --> 01:52:13.160]  The only thing the attorney can bring before the court himself is what's already in the record.
[01:52:13.160 --> 01:52:17.160]  So your objection would be that this is not before the court.
[01:52:17.160 --> 01:52:27.160]  And if the counsel wants to testify, then you want him sworn in.
[01:52:27.160 --> 01:52:29.160]  Okay.
[01:52:29.160 --> 01:52:32.160]  Well, what they've put in the record is a pack of lies.
[01:52:32.160 --> 01:52:41.160]  I mean, they even accused two of the...or one of the plaintiffs and his friend of stalking her,
[01:52:41.160 --> 01:52:46.160]  attaching some kind of tracking device to her vehicle.
[01:52:46.160 --> 01:52:52.160]  She accused and said that she filed a police report with the cybercrime unit in Burbank,
[01:52:52.160 --> 01:52:56.160]  and we all called them up and they said they have no knowledge of any such report.
[01:52:56.160 --> 01:53:04.160]  Now, whether she reported it to some other jurisdiction and just told us Burbank, we don't know.
[01:53:04.160 --> 01:53:07.160]  But they said there was no such report.
[01:53:07.160 --> 01:53:13.160]  But she put that in the court hearing in one of the papers that they were stalking her.
[01:53:13.160 --> 01:53:22.160]  I suspect with your kind of diligence that you won't have any problem being able to distinguish
[01:53:22.160 --> 01:53:26.160]  what is actually before the court, what is true before the court,
[01:53:26.160 --> 01:53:32.160]  what's been established as opposed to just what's been claimed.
[01:53:32.160 --> 01:53:37.160]  You shouldn't have any problem with that.
[01:53:37.160 --> 01:53:38.160]  You're savvy enough.
[01:53:38.160 --> 01:53:41.160]  You have enough experience.
[01:53:41.160 --> 01:53:49.160]  It's the speaking part if I come against a shyster that's just a real shyster that just, you know, tries...
[01:53:49.160 --> 01:53:54.160]  because, you know, her first attorney in the adverture proceeding, he said,
[01:53:54.160 --> 01:53:58.160]  I'm really good, and he said, I'll shut you all down in no time at all.
[01:53:58.160 --> 01:54:03.160]  And then he quit because you wouldn't pay him in July.
[01:54:03.160 --> 01:54:10.160]  He didn't realize how churlish you were, or he wouldn't have said that.
[01:54:10.160 --> 01:54:11.160]  He didn't.
[01:54:11.160 --> 01:54:18.160]  He called me a serial litigant.
[01:54:18.160 --> 01:54:20.160]  You're one of those people who cares about justice too much.
[01:54:20.160 --> 01:54:24.160]  Why don't you just give up and go away?
[01:54:24.160 --> 01:54:30.160]  And he said, I'm trying to be an attorney.
[01:54:30.160 --> 01:54:36.160]  You need to try harder.
[01:54:36.160 --> 01:54:39.160]  Oh, he said you were trying to be an attorney.
[01:54:39.160 --> 01:54:41.160]  I was trying to be an attorney.
[01:54:41.160 --> 01:54:47.160]  I was just trying to be an attorney filing all these lawsuits and pretending I'm an attorney.
[01:54:47.160 --> 01:54:54.160]  I don't want to pretend.
[01:54:54.160 --> 01:54:57.160]  So anyway, that's where I'm at with that.
[01:54:57.160 --> 01:55:01.160]  And, you know, as I say, the bankruptcy health clinic attorney was really good.
[01:55:01.160 --> 01:55:10.160]  And he said, the reason we like to do these health clinics is because, you know, proceeds are usually really bad,
[01:55:10.160 --> 01:55:15.160]  and they take up so much time rattling on about nonsensical things.
[01:55:15.160 --> 01:55:19.160]  By the time the judge gets to our cases, he's bored and fed up, and he wants to quit.
[01:55:19.160 --> 01:55:26.160]  And he said, so we want things to run smoothly, so we try to help you get through the system as best you can.
[01:55:26.160 --> 01:55:32.160]  But he said, you know, I've seen some of your papers, and they're very good for a pro se.
[01:55:32.160 --> 01:55:34.160]  Not perfect, he said, but very good.
[01:55:34.160 --> 01:55:37.160]  So that's a compliment, I think.
[01:55:37.160 --> 01:55:39.160]  Good.
[01:55:39.160 --> 01:55:41.160]  Another thing.
[01:55:41.160 --> 01:55:47.160]  About this hearing, will you talk about this hearing you and Brett were blocked out of today?
[01:55:47.160 --> 01:56:01.160]  Oh, yes, we tried to call in EJ, had a hearing on her, you know, request for, you know, waiver of court piece.
[01:56:01.160 --> 01:56:08.160]  And we tried to call in, and I was kicked out, literally, you know, dismissed from it three times.
[01:56:08.160 --> 01:56:10.160]  And I hear Brett was.
[01:56:10.160 --> 01:56:12.160]  Yeah, same here.
[01:56:12.160 --> 01:56:20.160]  You guys didn't know it, but I was, too.
[01:56:20.160 --> 01:56:25.160]  What is it with these California courts that they can, you know, kick you out?
[01:56:25.160 --> 01:56:32.160]  EJ said it was something to do with, you know, a privacy on this, and she'd already said, I don't care.
[01:56:32.160 --> 01:56:37.160]  I want them on the case, because she had no court reporter.
[01:56:37.160 --> 01:56:42.160]  And then the judge, you know, denied that he'd said something he'd just said.
[01:56:42.160 --> 01:56:45.160]  And she said, this is why I need a court reporter.
[01:56:45.160 --> 01:56:47.160]  And that's why she wanted witnesses.
[01:56:47.160 --> 01:56:58.160]  To his end point, part of his problem is he blocked a journalist.
[01:56:58.160 --> 01:57:00.160]  Brett's a journalist.
[01:57:00.160 --> 01:57:02.160]  He's a talk show host.
[01:57:02.160 --> 01:57:04.160]  Yeah.
[01:57:04.160 --> 01:57:05.160]  That's right.
[01:57:05.160 --> 01:57:06.160]  That's right.
[01:57:06.160 --> 01:57:10.160]  And they denied a journalist access to the public court.
[01:57:10.160 --> 01:57:15.160]  And they denied friends and the court watchers and observers.
[01:57:15.160 --> 01:57:17.160]  You know, how is this okay?
[01:57:17.160 --> 01:57:20.160]  It's a public court.
[01:57:20.160 --> 01:57:31.160]  That should give a criminal complaint to the special agent in charge of the Dallas chapter of the FBI.
[01:57:31.160 --> 01:57:33.160]  Why the Dallas chapter?
[01:57:33.160 --> 01:57:36.160]  Why Dallas?
[01:57:36.160 --> 01:57:42.160]  Because Brett's in the Dallas in that section.
[01:57:42.160 --> 01:57:43.160]  I don't know.
[01:57:43.160 --> 01:57:44.160]  Is that Dallas?
[01:57:44.160 --> 01:57:46.160]  It seems like Dallas a couple hours.
[01:57:46.160 --> 01:57:48.160]  Okay.
[01:57:48.160 --> 01:57:50.160]  It doesn't matter.
[01:57:50.160 --> 01:57:51.160]  There might be one.
[01:57:51.160 --> 01:57:53.160]  Are you closer to Lufkin?
[01:57:53.160 --> 01:58:01.160]  I think I might file in the Fed over where he is.
[01:58:01.160 --> 01:58:03.160]  Somewhere near L.A.
[01:58:03.160 --> 01:58:04.160]  No, no, no.
[01:58:04.160 --> 01:58:05.160]  Do it here.
[01:58:05.160 --> 01:58:08.160]  Then he has to get an attorney here.
[01:58:08.160 --> 01:58:09.160]  Oh, okay.
[01:58:09.160 --> 01:58:14.160]  And that establishes diversity.
[01:58:14.160 --> 01:58:15.160]  That'll be fun.
[01:58:15.160 --> 01:58:18.160]  It's appalling that they are allowed to do this.
[01:58:18.160 --> 01:58:24.160]  And I couldn't even call in and find out any information because no one answers the phone.
[01:58:24.160 --> 01:58:26.160]  Well, they're not allowed.
[01:58:26.160 --> 01:58:34.160]  They have no authority to do this and they just hope that they will be allowed by people like you and me.
[01:58:34.160 --> 01:58:35.160]  But we have other plans.
[01:58:35.160 --> 01:58:39.160]  We plan to hold them accountable and not allow them to do that.
[01:58:39.160 --> 01:58:44.160]  It might be a good idea if we made up a federal complaint and posted it.
[01:58:44.160 --> 01:58:46.160]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain.
[01:58:46.160 --> 01:58:50.160]  We'll be right back.
[01:58:50.160 --> 01:58:53.160]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[01:58:53.160 --> 01:58:57.160]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:57.160 --> 01:59:01.160]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:59:01.160 --> 01:59:06.160]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:06.160 --> 01:59:08.160]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:08.160 --> 01:59:13.160]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:59:13.160 --> 01:59:17.160]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:17.160 --> 01:59:21.160]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[01:59:21.160 --> 01:59:27.160]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:27.160 --> 01:59:32.160]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:32.160 --> 01:59:43.160]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:43.160 --> 01:59:47.160]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:47.160 --> 01:59:51.160]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:51.160 --> 02:00:18.160]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.