[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.500 --> 00:09.500] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.500 --> 00:11.000] Our liberty depends on it. [00:11.000 --> 00:16.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights. [00:16.500 --> 00:18.500] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.500 --> 00:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.000 --> 00:26.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:26.500 --> 00:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.000 --> 00:34.500] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:34.500 --> 00:38.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [00:38.000 --> 00:42.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.000 --> 00:45.500] Start over with Startpage. [00:45.500 --> 00:47.500] Spar, it's what fighters do. [00:47.500 --> 00:51.000] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:51.000 --> 00:54.000] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:54.000 --> 01:02.500] Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion. [01:02.500 --> 01:08.000] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion. [01:08.000 --> 01:10.500] But petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.500 --> 01:14.000] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.000 --> 01:17.000] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, [01:17.000 --> 01:21.000] we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:21.000 --> 01:31.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.000 --> 01:34.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:34.500 --> 01:38.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:38.000 --> 01:40.000] Our liberty depends on it. [01:40.000 --> 01:46.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:46.000 --> 01:48.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:48.000 --> 01:51.500] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:51.500 --> 01:56.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [01:56.500 --> 01:58.000] So protect your rights. [01:58.000 --> 02:01.500] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.500 --> 02:04.000] Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. [02:04.000 --> 02:08.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [02:08.000 --> 02:12.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.000 --> 02:15.000] Start over with StartPage. [02:15.000 --> 02:22.000] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:22.000 --> 02:26.000] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, [02:26.000 --> 02:30.000] arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:30.000 --> 02:34.000] Get it? Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? [02:34.000 --> 02:38.000] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well when he said, [02:38.000 --> 02:45.000] the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny, [02:45.000 --> 02:51.000] which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to always be possible. [02:51.000 --> 03:09.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:21.000 --> 03:27.000] Whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do? [03:27.000 --> 03:33.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:33.000 --> 03:38.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:38.000 --> 03:44.000] When you were eight and you had bad traits, you'd go to school and learn the golden rules. [03:44.000 --> 03:49.000] So why are you acting like a bloody fool? If you get hot, then you must get cool. [03:49.000 --> 03:55.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:55.000 --> 04:00.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [04:00.000 --> 04:06.000] You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one, you chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your part. [04:06.000 --> 04:11.000] You chuck it on your brother and you chuck it on your sister, you chuck it on that one and you chuck it on me. [04:11.000 --> 04:33.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [04:33.000 --> 04:41.000] Nobody now give you no break. Police now give you no break. That old soldier man now give you no break. [04:41.000 --> 05:10.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [05:11.000 --> 05:18.000] If anyone has a question or comment they would like to bring before us, feel free to call us. [05:18.000 --> 05:22.000] Our call-in number is 940-399. [05:22.000 --> 05:23.000] Wait, wait, wait, what? [05:23.000 --> 05:26.000] No, that's my phone number. Hold on, hold on, hold on. [05:26.000 --> 05:33.000] Our call-in number is 512. Brent has been screwing with me, giving me wrong information. [05:33.000 --> 05:36.000] I tried to tell him this was Tuesday and he wouldn't go for it. [05:36.000 --> 05:46.000] Okay, but I did screw up my phone number. Okay, it is, call-in number is 512-646-1984. [05:46.000 --> 05:48.000] If you have a question or comment give us a call. [05:48.000 --> 05:55.000] And we would really like some very complex and difficult questions. [05:55.000 --> 06:02.000] Brent, one thing we haven't done in a long time is go through the basics. [06:02.000 --> 06:09.000] We do these calls and we assume everybody has listened to our show a number of times [06:09.000 --> 06:13.000] and they already understand all the basics. [06:13.000 --> 06:19.000] I really need to do, we need to do a show that we can produce as an archive [06:19.000 --> 06:29.000] where we walk through all of the basics of what we call running the routine on them. [06:29.000 --> 06:35.000] Okay, well, if people are listening to the archives then they probably got that. [06:35.000 --> 06:40.000] Well, it's been so long since we've actually done that. It's been months and months and months. [06:40.000 --> 06:41.000] Okay. [06:41.000 --> 06:47.000] You know, we don't talk about never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth. [06:47.000 --> 06:52.000] Never ask a public official to do anything you actually want them to do. [06:52.000 --> 06:59.000] And we have all these rules and methodologies for going after people. [06:59.000 --> 07:03.000] That's kind of a basic structure. [07:03.000 --> 07:07.000] And once you have the basics, go ahead. [07:07.000 --> 07:11.000] One thing that I find that people, one of these, you're talking about basics, [07:11.000 --> 07:16.000] and one thing it seems like people don't necessarily get right away is [07:16.000 --> 07:19.000] when they're being accused of something, [07:19.000 --> 07:23.000] the tendency is to point the finger at the accuser and say, [07:23.000 --> 07:25.000] yeah, but he didn't do this right. [07:25.000 --> 07:28.000] And he should have asked me for my, or whatever. [07:28.000 --> 07:30.000] He didn't give me my Miranda warnings. [07:30.000 --> 07:33.000] Objection. Relevance. Relevance. [07:33.000 --> 07:34.000] Exactly. [07:34.000 --> 07:39.000] As if pointing out the other person's flaws is going to get them off the hook. [07:39.000 --> 07:45.000] And it is good to point out the issues and defects with due process, [07:45.000 --> 07:51.000] but it's a separate side track, a side parallel set of issues [07:51.000 --> 07:54.000] that don't really get that person off the hook. [07:54.000 --> 07:57.000] And people don't really think of that right away. [07:57.000 --> 08:00.000] They don't realize that there are channels of issues going on [08:00.000 --> 08:04.000] and not just all one pile of swirl of bad feelings. [08:04.000 --> 08:10.000] People tend to think that if they can just point out that there are two wrongs here, [08:10.000 --> 08:12.000] then that will make a right. [08:12.000 --> 08:14.000] That is very perceptive. [08:14.000 --> 08:20.000] We had Celeste on from Ohio last night, and she had an issue. [08:20.000 --> 08:25.000] And the issue was that this private company didn't want to hire somebody [08:25.000 --> 08:29.000] unless they met all the company's criteria. [08:29.000 --> 08:37.000] And the struggle was drawing the line in the right place. [08:37.000 --> 08:42.000] Yes, we don't want to be discriminated against. [08:42.000 --> 08:47.000] And it was her position that these companies should not be able to discriminate [08:47.000 --> 08:53.000] against someone because they didn't elect to take the vaccination. [08:53.000 --> 08:55.000] I said, okay. [08:55.000 --> 09:04.000] And she was working from the perspective that these companies ought to be [09:04.000 --> 09:10.000] regulated and controlled so that they couldn't do this. [09:10.000 --> 09:20.000] And I was trying to put forward the other side of it is I'm the guy that owns the company. [09:20.000 --> 09:22.000] I take the risk. [09:22.000 --> 09:23.000] I put my money. [09:23.000 --> 09:24.000] I put my time. [09:24.000 --> 09:27.000] I put my life into building this business. [09:27.000 --> 09:33.000] And the government is going to come in and micromanage my every move to make sure [09:33.000 --> 09:39.000] I don't hurt anyone's feelings or I don't provide an opportunity to someone [09:39.000 --> 09:43.000] because they want that opportunity. [09:43.000 --> 09:51.000] So you have the person over here that feels like they have a right to equal protection. [09:51.000 --> 09:55.000] They have the right to be treated like everyone else. [09:55.000 --> 10:00.000] And then you have the company over here that says, wait a minute. [10:00.000 --> 10:06.000] If I hire that guy and he doesn't have a vaccination and he comes in here and [10:06.000 --> 10:10.000] infects all my people, I once talked to someone who was complaining about a [10:10.000 --> 10:14.000] dentist who wouldn't let him come in without a mask. [10:14.000 --> 10:22.000] And the dentist told him just two weeks ago, two-thirds of my help were off with COVID. [10:22.000 --> 10:26.000] I couldn't operate the office because I had so many people off with COVID. [10:26.000 --> 10:29.000] And you want me to let you come in here without a mask? [10:29.000 --> 10:32.000] Give me a break here. [10:32.000 --> 10:36.000] We have to be real careful what we ask for. [10:36.000 --> 10:47.000] And I really enjoyed Celeste because we were able to kind of balance out, [10:47.000 --> 10:54.000] instead of demonizing everyone, back up and take a look from both sides. [10:54.000 --> 11:01.000] I had just read a post by Dr. Graves who said that we should learn to look at [11:01.000 --> 11:06.000] things through the eyes of our opponent. [11:06.000 --> 11:13.000] And I thought that was incredibly good advice for two reasons. [11:13.000 --> 11:21.000] It will keep us from asking for unreasonable concessions. [11:21.000 --> 11:28.000] And it will also show us how to anticipate and deal with our opposition [11:28.000 --> 11:37.000] when they're asking us for unreasonable concessions, if we are to be effective. [11:37.000 --> 11:46.000] We have to find the middle ground where not only my side looks good, [11:46.000 --> 11:53.000] but the other side, if they try to attack my side, they don't look so good. [11:53.000 --> 12:00.000] And we don't want to be coming in there asking for things that if we get them, [12:00.000 --> 12:05.000] we may wind up not being happy with what we got. [12:05.000 --> 12:11.000] It goes to that slippery slope syndrome. [12:11.000 --> 12:15.000] So I've kind of run this off somewhere, I'm not sure. [12:15.000 --> 12:28.000] But I'm hoping that we can present a set of logic that puts everyone on [12:28.000 --> 12:34.000] very strong rational grounds. [12:34.000 --> 12:37.000] And since I've confused this whole thing, I might as well go to a caller. [12:37.000 --> 12:39.000] We have a caller. [12:39.000 --> 12:45.000] Before I say anything more stupid than I already have and confuse people more, [12:45.000 --> 12:48.000] let's go to Stephen in Texas. [12:48.000 --> 12:56.000] Stephen, what do you have for us today? [12:56.000 --> 13:07.000] A question on notice for a citation in a misdemeanor. [13:07.000 --> 13:10.000] Brett, could you understand him? [13:10.000 --> 13:12.000] I had a little trouble there. [13:12.000 --> 13:13.000] Yeah, I understood. [13:13.000 --> 13:16.000] Stephen, your volume is a little low. [13:16.000 --> 13:22.000] I don't know if you can maybe get your mouth a little closer to the mic. [13:22.000 --> 13:24.000] Sorry. [13:24.000 --> 13:32.000] Yeah, he's asking about notice about a citation on a misdemeanor. [13:32.000 --> 13:33.000] All right. [13:33.000 --> 13:34.000] I'm sorry. [13:34.000 --> 13:36.000] Can you hear me better this time? [13:36.000 --> 13:37.000] Absolutely. [13:37.000 --> 13:38.000] Sorry. [13:38.000 --> 13:42.000] It's the speaker malfunction sometimes on this. [13:42.000 --> 13:49.000] So this goes back to the case I have there in Hillsboro, Texas. [13:49.000 --> 13:58.000] And they wrote as a part of the condemnation process, the acting death. [13:58.000 --> 13:59.000] Okay. [13:59.000 --> 14:02.000] You said condemnation? [14:02.000 --> 14:03.000] Yes. [14:03.000 --> 14:07.000] They're condemning a property they're trying to take the property? [14:07.000 --> 14:11.000] Condemning it to tear it down as a public business. [14:11.000 --> 14:13.000] Oh, okay. [14:13.000 --> 14:21.000] And so as a part of the remedy, the deputy fire marshal has claimed that he was [14:21.000 --> 14:30.000] ordered to issue 10 consecutive citations on the property in notations that I [14:30.000 --> 14:34.000] had done through records, and he did that all to my wife. [14:34.000 --> 14:36.000] He sent every one of those to my wife. [14:36.000 --> 14:37.000] Wait a minute. [14:37.000 --> 14:38.000] Wait a minute. [14:38.000 --> 14:42.000] Who ordered him to issue citations? [14:42.000 --> 14:48.000] I'm not clear if it was the so-called director of public safety or if it was a [14:48.000 --> 14:50.000] building and standards commission. [14:50.000 --> 14:53.000] I'm not certain at this second. [14:53.000 --> 14:59.000] In either case, that appears to be a criminal conspiracy. [14:59.000 --> 15:06.000] If the fire marshal had reason to believe and did believe that a crime had been [15:06.000 --> 15:14.000] committed, he had a duty to issue those citations. [15:14.000 --> 15:19.000] But if he issued those citations because someone else told him to? [15:19.000 --> 15:24.000] Yeah, or told him that he needs to issue 10 of them. [15:24.000 --> 15:25.000] Wait a minute. [15:25.000 --> 15:33.000] If that's conspiracy to commit, obstruction, would that be obstruction, Grant? [15:33.000 --> 15:35.000] If someone's conspiring... [15:35.000 --> 15:37.000] 30805. [15:37.000 --> 15:42.000] Now, 30805 is shielding. [15:42.000 --> 15:47.000] Obstruction of justice, that would be 3903. [15:47.000 --> 15:48.000] No, I'm sorry. [15:48.000 --> 15:52.000] Obstruction of justice is 3605. [15:52.000 --> 15:53.000] 3606. [15:53.000 --> 15:54.000] 3606, yeah. [15:54.000 --> 15:56.000] 3605 is witness tampering. [15:56.000 --> 15:59.000] 3605 is obstruction retaliation. [15:59.000 --> 16:02.000] Well, let's see. [16:02.000 --> 16:07.000] It says on 3606, a person commits an offense if the person intentionally or [16:07.000 --> 16:13.000] knowingly harms or threatens to harm another by an unlawful act. [16:13.000 --> 16:18.000] We've got one in retaliation for or on account of the service of another [16:18.000 --> 16:24.000] servant, witness, prospective witness, person who reported or intends to report, [16:24.000 --> 16:27.000] or two, to prevent or delay the service. [16:27.000 --> 16:33.000] Okay, so this is all about somebody who's either a witness or, you know, [16:33.000 --> 16:35.000] intending to be a witness. [16:35.000 --> 16:39.000] We've got the guy who's in a position to file these complaints, [16:39.000 --> 16:45.000] and we have someone else ordering him to file those complaints. [16:45.000 --> 16:51.000] So then the person himself would not have done that without the order. [16:51.000 --> 16:54.000] That sounds like obstruction. [16:54.000 --> 17:00.000] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, you'll be right back. [17:00.000 --> 17:04.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even [17:04.000 --> 17:05.000] lawsuits? [17:05.000 --> 17:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [17:09.000 --> 17:13.000] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, [17:13.000 --> 17:15.000] and now you can win two. [17:15.000 --> 17:19.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court [17:19.000 --> 17:23.000] using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, [17:23.000 --> 17:27.000] mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get [17:27.000 --> 17:31.000] debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables [17:31.000 --> 17:34.000] on them and make them pay you to go away. [17:34.000 --> 17:38.000] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt [17:38.000 --> 17:39.000] collectors. [17:39.000 --> 17:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [17:41.000 --> 17:45.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue [17:45.000 --> 17:49.000] Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [17:49.000 --> 17:57.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-n at yahoo.com [17:57.000 --> 18:01.000] to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [18:01.000 --> 18:05.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [18:05.000 --> 18:08.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the [18:08.000 --> 18:11.000] world, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to [18:11.000 --> 18:13.000] stand and defend our own rights. [18:13.000 --> 18:16.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the [18:16.000 --> 18:19.000] right to act in our own private capacity, and, most importantly, the right [18:19.000 --> 18:20.000] to due process of law. [18:20.000 --> 18:23.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to [18:23.000 --> 18:26.000] enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [18:26.000 --> 18:29.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy A. Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [18:29.000 --> 18:32.000] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will [18:32.000 --> 18:35.000] help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule [18:35.000 --> 18:36.000] of law. [18:36.000 --> 18:39.000] Learn more about this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com [18:39.000 --> 18:40.000] and ordering your copy today. [18:40.000 --> 18:43.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation [18:43.000 --> 18:47.000] Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [18:47.000 --> 18:50.000] hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [18:50.000 --> 18:52.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from [18:52.000 --> 18:54.000] ruleoflawradio.com. [18:54.000 --> 18:57.000] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want [18:57.000 --> 19:02.000] and deserve. [19:02.000 --> 19:30.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [19:30.000 --> 19:44.000] Okay, we are back. [19:44.000 --> 19:47.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. [19:47.000 --> 19:52.000] And on the break, Brett brought up a really salient point. [19:52.000 --> 19:54.000] I'm in the wrong place. [19:54.000 --> 19:59.000] He actually brought up a statute I've probably read, but don't remember. [19:59.000 --> 20:03.000] Will you address, was it 3603? [20:03.000 --> 20:07.000] Yeah, we're in the Texas Penal Code because you're in Texas and we're [20:07.000 --> 20:08.000] looking for the crimes. [20:08.000 --> 20:13.000] And we were taking a look at this obstruction, which is in Chapter 36, [20:13.000 --> 20:16.000] 3606 obstruction. [20:16.000 --> 20:21.000] And it looks to me like this might be a better fit for the other way around, [20:21.000 --> 20:25.000] where if the fire marshal had a good reason to think that he needed to do [20:25.000 --> 20:30.000] something and then he was told, no, don't take any action against them. [20:30.000 --> 20:32.000] Why, that's the mayor's property. [20:32.000 --> 20:33.000] Are you crazy? [20:33.000 --> 20:34.000] Don't do that. [20:34.000 --> 20:37.000] And he were obstructed in that way. [20:37.000 --> 20:41.000] That would probably be a better fit for this 3606. [20:41.000 --> 20:46.000] But I see here 3603 does sound more like your situation. [20:46.000 --> 20:49.000] It's a coercion of public servant. [20:49.000 --> 20:55.000] If somebody influences or attempts to influence a public servant in a [20:55.000 --> 21:01.000] specific exercise of his official power or a specific performance of his [21:01.000 --> 21:07.000] official duty or influences or attempts to influence a public servant to [21:07.000 --> 21:10.000] violate the public servant's known legal duty. [21:10.000 --> 21:17.000] So here we have, it looks to me like that fits a little better because [21:17.000 --> 21:22.000] probably coercion is tied to, hey, you were ordered to do this, [21:22.000 --> 21:29.000] so the inference is that if you don't, your job could suffer. [21:29.000 --> 21:30.000] What do you think? [21:30.000 --> 21:36.000] And I really like the sound of that because that's a statute that I didn't [21:36.000 --> 21:37.000] know about. [21:37.000 --> 21:41.000] I probably read it and just it wasn't important to me at the time, [21:41.000 --> 21:44.000] so I didn't really log it in my memory. [21:44.000 --> 21:50.000] I suspect that these officials will be in the same situation. [21:50.000 --> 21:55.000] Same situation meaning that they're not familiar with that one? [21:55.000 --> 21:57.000] Exactly. [21:57.000 --> 22:01.000] And they weren't really aware that what they were doing would be in [22:01.000 --> 22:03.000] violation of that. [22:03.000 --> 22:07.000] So when you nail them with it, they're going to say, huh? [22:07.000 --> 22:09.000] Wait, whoa, hold on. [22:09.000 --> 22:11.000] I didn't mean to do that. [22:11.000 --> 22:15.000] Then you tell them, screws versus you ass. [22:15.000 --> 22:17.000] Exactly. [22:17.000 --> 22:28.000] If a public official violates a ruling of this court and he be saying, [22:28.000 --> 22:34.000] he may not be heard to say he knows not what he does. [22:34.000 --> 22:36.000] So yes, they're screwed. [22:36.000 --> 22:41.000] And I really like the idea of sticking a statute on them that they haven't [22:41.000 --> 22:44.000] seen before. [22:44.000 --> 22:51.000] It would be interesting to do a search on Lexis or Westlaw to see if any [22:51.000 --> 23:02.000] public official has been prosecuted for violation of that particular statute. [23:02.000 --> 23:06.000] I always think, oh yeah, and all this time somebody has. [23:06.000 --> 23:12.000] You hear us quoting 2202B2A, Texas penal code, first degree felony, [23:12.000 --> 23:17.000] aggravated assault, by a peace officer. [23:17.000 --> 23:22.000] If you interfere with a peace officer in the performance of his duty while [23:22.000 --> 23:32.000] you are brandishing a deadly weapon, that's 2202B2B. [23:32.000 --> 23:34.000] I did a search on that one. [23:34.000 --> 23:36.000] I got 60,000 hits. [23:36.000 --> 23:38.000] And that's all Lexis would give me. [23:38.000 --> 23:42.000] It indicated there were more, but this is all I could give you. [23:42.000 --> 23:55.000] 360, I mean, Texas penal code 2202B2A, that's a public official who commits [23:55.000 --> 24:01.000] simple assault while prominently displaying a deadly weapon and while [24:01.000 --> 24:06.000] acting under the color or pretense of official capacity, first degree felony. [24:06.000 --> 24:08.000] So the other way around. [24:08.000 --> 24:11.000] Zero. [24:11.000 --> 24:14.000] Oh, this is not skewed at all, Randy. [24:14.000 --> 24:22.000] Zero, not one in the history of the state of Texas. [24:22.000 --> 24:30.000] What is wrong with that picture and who here has not had a policeman pull [24:30.000 --> 24:35.000] them over, turn their lights on them while they're driving their private [24:35.000 --> 24:42.000] motor vehicle or private conveyance and walked up to their car prominently [24:42.000 --> 24:50.000] displaying a deadly weapon to enforce the commercial transportation code. [24:50.000 --> 24:53.000] That's first degree felony aggravated assault. [24:53.000 --> 24:58.000] By definition, no one, zero. [24:58.000 --> 25:09.000] And I suspect if I look up 3603, I'm going to find some similarly skewed results. [25:09.000 --> 25:15.000] If that is the problem, it is our fault. [25:15.000 --> 25:18.000] Your fault and my fault. [25:18.000 --> 25:25.000] Because we did, you don't expect public officials to tattle on themselves. [25:25.000 --> 25:27.000] It's our job. [25:27.000 --> 25:30.000] We need to go tattle on them. [25:30.000 --> 25:37.000] I suspect that most everybody listening to the sound of my voice has been [25:37.000 --> 25:43.000] pulled over by a public official purporting to exercise the commercial [25:43.000 --> 25:49.000] transportation code when he had zero reason to believe that you were [25:49.000 --> 25:55.000] operating in commerce and he did so while prominently displaying a deadly [25:55.000 --> 25:57.000] weapon. [25:57.000 --> 26:03.000] If that happened to you in Texas, that is a first degree felony on the part [26:03.000 --> 26:06.000] of the officer. [26:06.000 --> 26:13.000] We have 29 million people in Texas. [26:13.000 --> 26:18.000] Has no one ever brought that up? [26:18.000 --> 26:23.000] What the heck is going on? [26:23.000 --> 26:25.000] Well, I brought it up. [26:25.000 --> 26:26.000] I brought it up. [26:26.000 --> 26:28.000] Yeah, Brett's brought it up. [26:28.000 --> 26:31.000] Eddie Craig's brought it up. [26:31.000 --> 26:34.000] But we can't get it adjudicated. [26:34.000 --> 26:40.000] And I'm hoping to get lots more people to bring it up. [26:40.000 --> 26:48.000] Anyway, Stephen, we kind of forgot about you. [26:48.000 --> 26:51.000] Thanks for your show. [26:51.000 --> 26:55.000] Okay, let's go back to you. [26:55.000 --> 26:57.000] What was your question again? [26:57.000 --> 26:58.000] 3603. [26:58.000 --> 27:03.000] He has the fire marshal ordered to issue 10 citations and so the fire marshal [27:03.000 --> 27:07.000] did issue 10 citations. [27:07.000 --> 27:14.000] And then he, so that I found in the public notice printed in the paper that [27:14.000 --> 27:17.000] he claims he was ordered to, I guess, by the Building and Standards [27:17.000 --> 27:18.000] Commission. [27:18.000 --> 27:21.000] So I'll deal with that on a separate note. [27:21.000 --> 27:27.000] Building and Standards Commission, what is that? [27:27.000 --> 27:35.000] The city charter does actually contain provision to create a committee on [27:35.000 --> 27:39.000] buildings and standards to deal with substandard buildings or properties [27:39.000 --> 27:42.000] within the city. [27:42.000 --> 27:48.000] Okay, has the city actually created a building and standards, [27:48.000 --> 27:53.000] Buildings and Standards Commission? [27:53.000 --> 27:57.000] Let me tell you why I'm asking this question this way. [27:57.000 --> 28:04.000] We filed a, I was helping a guy, and we filed a petition for writ of mandamus [28:04.000 --> 28:12.000] claiming that the statutes didn't apply to an ordinary citizen. [28:12.000 --> 28:17.000] And the Court of Appeals gave us the ruling we wanted but not for the [28:17.000 --> 28:19.000] reason we asked. [28:19.000 --> 28:26.000] We claimed that an ordinance cannot apply to the general public. [28:26.000 --> 28:33.000] It can only apply to an employee of the jurisdiction or someone in contractual [28:33.000 --> 28:38.000] privity with the jurisdiction wherein they have agreed to the statutory [28:38.000 --> 28:39.000] scheme. [28:39.000 --> 28:44.000] If they apply it to the ordinary individual, then it acts like a law. [28:44.000 --> 28:47.000] And only the legislature can write law. [28:47.000 --> 28:52.000] So the Court of Appeals looked at this and said, holy crap, if we rule in [28:52.000 --> 28:58.000] this guy's favor, all the ordinances in the cities and counties in the state [28:58.000 --> 29:03.000] of Texas are rendered essentially null and void as it applies to individuals. [29:03.000 --> 29:05.000] So we can't do that. [29:05.000 --> 29:07.000] A very political move. [29:07.000 --> 29:10.000] So they come up with this other reason. [29:10.000 --> 29:16.000] They had a hearing here provided over by members of the public, and they [29:16.000 --> 29:21.000] can only have this kind of hearing if they have a meeting of the board and [29:21.000 --> 29:25.000] the board votes on whether or not they can have this hearing. [29:25.000 --> 29:28.000] And I said, what the heck is that crap, Ola? [29:28.000 --> 29:31.000] We didn't address anything like that. [29:31.000 --> 29:36.000] The Court of Appeals came up with a reason to give us our ruling so they [29:36.000 --> 29:40.000] wouldn't have to rule on what we brought before them. [29:40.000 --> 29:42.000] This sounds like that. [29:42.000 --> 29:46.000] Did they actually create this committee? [29:46.000 --> 29:49.000] I'm not sure if they actually did it or not. [29:49.000 --> 29:53.000] I just noted that they had the authorization to create one in their [29:53.000 --> 29:55.000] own order. [29:55.000 --> 29:56.000] Okay, hang on. [29:56.000 --> 30:03.000] Randy Count and Brett Fountain, we'll be right back. [30:03.000 --> 30:06.000] It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they [30:06.000 --> 30:08.000] negatively affected our health? [30:08.000 --> 30:11.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with new [30:11.000 --> 30:15.000] findings about how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry. [30:15.000 --> 30:17.000] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.000 --> 30:21.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:21.000 --> 30:25.000] Once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, [30:25.000 --> 30:26.000] too. [30:26.000 --> 30:27.000] So protect your rights. [30:27.000 --> 30:31.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:31.000 --> 30:33.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [30:33.000 --> 30:37.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the [30:37.000 --> 30:41.000] private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:41.000 --> 30:44.000] Start over with StartPage. [30:44.000 --> 30:47.000] Cell phones emit radio frequency energy. [30:47.000 --> 30:48.000] It's a fact. [30:48.000 --> 30:51.000] But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation [30:51.000 --> 30:53.000] near your head has been disputed. [30:53.000 --> 30:56.000] Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have [30:56.000 --> 30:57.000] downplayed concerns. [30:57.000 --> 31:01.000] Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that [31:01.000 --> 31:03.000] cell phones affect brain chemistry. [31:03.000 --> 31:07.000] A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the [31:07.000 --> 31:11.000] brain closest to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on. [31:11.000 --> 31:15.000] While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not [31:15.000 --> 31:16.000] taking any chances. [31:16.000 --> 31:20.000] I always keep the phone far from my body, and I use a corded headset. [31:20.000 --> 31:22.000] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. [31:22.000 --> 31:30.000] More news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:30.000 --> 31:31.000] I lost my son. [31:31.000 --> 31:32.000] My nephew. [31:32.000 --> 31:33.000] My uncle. [31:33.000 --> 31:34.000] My son. [31:34.000 --> 31:35.000] On September 11, 2001. [31:35.000 --> 31:38.000] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11. [31:38.000 --> 31:42.000] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. [31:42.000 --> 31:46.000] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, [31:46.000 --> 31:50.000] over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and [31:50.000 --> 31:52.000] believe there is more to the story. [31:52.000 --> 31:55.000] Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. [31:55.000 --> 31:57.000] Go to buildingwhat.org. [31:57.000 --> 32:01.000] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [32:01.000 --> 32:04.000] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better [32:04.000 --> 32:06.000] understanding of His Word? [32:06.000 --> 32:10.000] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. [32:10.000 --> 32:14.000] Central Time for scripture talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the [32:14.000 --> 32:17.000] scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [32:17.000 --> 32:21.000] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to [32:21.000 --> 32:24.000] be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. [32:24.000 --> 32:28.000] Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, [32:28.000 --> 32:32.000] where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [32:32.000 --> 32:36.000] Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on [32:36.000 --> 32:39.000] sound doctrine and Christian character development. [32:39.000 --> 32:43.000] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a [32:43.000 --> 32:44.000] hearing ear. [32:44.000 --> 32:48.000] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into [32:48.000 --> 32:50.000] the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [32:50.000 --> 32:55.000] So tune in to scripture talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays [32:55.000 --> 33:00.000] from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures. [33:00.000 --> 33:10.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com. [33:30.000 --> 33:58.000] OK, we are back. [33:58.000 --> 34:04.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue of La Radio on this Friday, the 9th day [34:04.000 --> 34:07.000] of December, 2022. [34:07.000 --> 34:14.000] And we're talking to Stephen in Texas, and this went to an exact issue that [34:14.000 --> 34:16.000] we dealt with. [34:16.000 --> 34:24.000] You said that they are authorized to have this kind of meeting, to the [34:24.000 --> 34:31.000] council was authorized to approve having these kind of meetings, but you [34:31.000 --> 34:33.000] didn't know if they did or not. [34:33.000 --> 34:37.000] That is exactly the issue we ran into. [34:37.000 --> 34:43.000] In order to keep from addressing the issue we brought, they said that in [34:43.000 --> 34:49.000] this case, the guy had an auto parts place and he had some vehicles he was [34:49.000 --> 34:54.000] waiting for parts for, and the city manager was PO'd at him. [34:54.000 --> 34:56.000] So he called them junk vehicles. [34:56.000 --> 34:58.000] He says they're not junk vehicles. [34:58.000 --> 35:02.000] The prosecutor said, well, would you like to have a hearing to determine if [35:02.000 --> 35:04.000] they're junk vehicles or not? [35:04.000 --> 35:06.000] And he said, sure. [35:06.000 --> 35:10.000] And they put together a hearing, but instead of doing that, they used it as [35:10.000 --> 35:12.000] a trial. [35:12.000 --> 35:19.000] So the court of appeals, when we appealed claiming that the ordinances didn't [35:19.000 --> 35:23.000] apply, they found that. [35:23.000 --> 35:29.000] And what the code said is the city could have this kind of hearing, but the [35:29.000 --> 35:34.000] city had to meet and vote on whether or not they could have this kind of [35:34.000 --> 35:38.000] hearing before they did it. [35:38.000 --> 35:43.000] Yeah, they had to adopt it in the minutes of their board meetings. [35:43.000 --> 35:44.000] Yeah. [35:44.000 --> 35:49.000] So did they do that in your municipality? [35:49.000 --> 35:56.000] This is the kind of detail they never get around to. [35:56.000 --> 36:03.000] And for me, that was an important distinction because I looked at it and [36:03.000 --> 36:08.000] said, what in the heck is going on? [36:08.000 --> 36:16.000] We asked a question that was a really hard question that they did not want to [36:16.000 --> 36:18.000] have to answer. [36:18.000 --> 36:23.000] And in order to avoid answering our question, they turned it into a different [36:23.000 --> 36:29.000] issue and gave us our ruling on a different issue. [36:29.000 --> 36:37.000] Well, that did not create law concerning the applicability of city ordinances [36:37.000 --> 36:40.000] to the public. [36:40.000 --> 36:43.000] It addressed this other issue. [36:43.000 --> 36:45.000] They did not want to address the other one. [36:45.000 --> 36:48.000] They wanted to avoid it, see? [36:48.000 --> 36:49.000] Exactly. [36:49.000 --> 36:56.000] So they gave us the ruling we wanted, but not on the issue we wanted. [36:56.000 --> 36:58.000] So we can't appeal it. [36:58.000 --> 37:03.000] We asked to dismiss for lack of subject matter of jurisdiction, and we got [37:03.000 --> 37:04.000] that. [37:04.000 --> 37:07.000] So we can't say, wait a minute, wait a minute. [37:07.000 --> 37:10.000] You didn't dismiss it for lack of subject matter of jurisdiction on the [37:10.000 --> 37:12.000] issue we brought. [37:12.000 --> 37:15.000] And they're going to say, so what? [37:15.000 --> 37:19.000] So we don't get to get that issue into law. [37:19.000 --> 37:22.000] And these are always the kinds of questions. [37:22.000 --> 37:29.000] What it taught me was always ask a question they don't want to answer. [37:29.000 --> 37:34.000] But in your case, Stephan, they had a very good chance. [37:34.000 --> 37:38.000] They never had the hearing. [37:38.000 --> 37:46.000] They never brought that up in an open meeting and voted on it. [37:46.000 --> 37:48.000] It's so obscure. [37:48.000 --> 37:53.000] And I'm reading a clause right now in their charter that they're still, all [37:53.000 --> 37:58.000] commissions and committees are still subject to the city council, which is [37:58.000 --> 38:00.000] elected. [38:00.000 --> 38:04.000] The elected officials still have complete paramount authority over all matters [38:04.000 --> 38:06.000] in connection with board commissions. [38:06.000 --> 38:09.000] So that brings to mind something I hadn't thought of, and I'm going to chase [38:09.000 --> 38:12.000] that one down. [38:12.000 --> 38:20.000] So it is so much fun to catch these guys on these subtle details. [38:20.000 --> 38:23.000] It makes them crazy. [38:23.000 --> 38:31.000] Well, you bring to mind when they entered into, as discussed before, they [38:31.000 --> 38:36.000] entered into a contract with the old demo contractor, destroyed the place, [38:36.000 --> 38:42.000] left a mess or such, but when I asked for the papers on who authorized this [38:42.000 --> 38:49.000] contract, and I wanted the approved contract, the authorized contract, to [38:49.000 --> 38:54.000] which they gave me back, they didn't give it back. [38:54.000 --> 38:56.000] That one they didn't give back. [38:56.000 --> 38:59.000] I found several things that this guy that's the so-called director of public [38:59.000 --> 39:04.000] safety has contracted and authorized that he has no authority to authorize. [39:04.000 --> 39:06.000] So I got him there also. [39:06.000 --> 39:08.000] He never had the authority to enter a contract. [39:08.000 --> 39:12.000] According to the charter, anything over 300 bucks would have had to go through [39:12.000 --> 39:17.000] the actual city manager, been voted on by the council. [39:17.000 --> 39:19.000] They don't do that. [39:19.000 --> 39:20.000] I love this. [39:20.000 --> 39:27.000] Randy, I think that if they had left him alone in the first place, they would [39:27.000 --> 39:31.000] never experience what they're about to experience. [39:31.000 --> 39:35.000] They've sent him to reading things and looking in there, all their little [39:35.000 --> 39:42.000] details about what's $300, and they were never expecting to get themselves in [39:42.000 --> 39:44.000] all this kind of mess. [39:44.000 --> 39:48.000] And we find this all the time. [39:48.000 --> 39:52.000] These officials are so inept. [39:52.000 --> 39:59.000] It's kind of frightening because they screw all this stuff up and have no idea, [39:59.000 --> 40:05.000] but 99% of the people never stand up for themselves. [40:05.000 --> 40:10.000] That 1% that does is what is needed. [40:10.000 --> 40:13.000] I think what we really need is 3%. [40:13.000 --> 40:24.000] The reason I say 3% is during the revolution, the Continental Congress and [40:24.000 --> 40:32.000] all the followers of the Continental Congress made up 3% of the population. [40:32.000 --> 40:40.000] We took this country away from Great Britain with 3%. [40:40.000 --> 40:45.000] That's all it took. [40:45.000 --> 40:52.000] So your opposition, it makes a big difference. [40:52.000 --> 40:57.000] If you go to Newark, Texas, I can almost assure you if you've got a business [40:57.000 --> 41:03.000] there and you have some used cars, some vehicles sitting around, they're going [41:03.000 --> 41:06.000] to leave you alone. [41:06.000 --> 41:12.000] They are not going to want to get into another one of these fights. [41:12.000 --> 41:16.000] So I think you're in a good position. [41:16.000 --> 41:22.000] It does take some detailed digging, but you want to put in an information request [41:22.000 --> 41:31.000] for when the hearing was held to authorize this kind of action. [41:31.000 --> 41:34.000] You want to read those minutes. [41:34.000 --> 41:37.000] It seems pretty self-explanatory. [41:37.000 --> 41:39.000] It says the board is in commission. [41:39.000 --> 41:48.000] It says the elected city council shall have paramount authority over all matters [41:48.000 --> 41:53.000] in connection with all their funding purchases, procedures. [41:53.000 --> 41:55.000] Wait a minute, wait a minute. [41:55.000 --> 41:59.000] What does that mean? [41:59.000 --> 42:02.000] Paramount authority? [42:02.000 --> 42:12.000] Yeah, well, does it mean that the board has to vote on whether or not these [42:12.000 --> 42:14.000] complaints are filed? [42:14.000 --> 42:17.000] What does that mean, have paramount authority? [42:17.000 --> 42:18.000] I don't know. [42:18.000 --> 42:22.000] It's not defined here. [42:22.000 --> 42:32.000] Who is the guy that issued the complaints, the fire marshal? [42:32.000 --> 42:33.000] Well, hold on. [42:33.000 --> 42:36.000] Let's not call him a fire marshal because he is not a fire marshal. [42:36.000 --> 42:41.000] Somebody has appointed him as a, quote unquote, deputy fire marshal, which is [42:41.000 --> 42:43.000] obviously not the fire marshal. [42:43.000 --> 42:44.000] The fire marshal retired. [42:44.000 --> 42:47.000] And before that, he was impersonating something else. [42:47.000 --> 42:49.000] He was a so-called community whatever. [42:49.000 --> 42:52.000] And before that, he was impersonating a code official. [42:52.000 --> 42:56.000] That's what he called himself on his stupid cards and his presentations, a code [42:56.000 --> 42:57.000] official. [42:57.000 --> 43:00.000] There's no such thing in stupid text as law whatsoever as a code official. [43:00.000 --> 43:03.000] The guy was an idiot. [43:03.000 --> 43:06.000] He impersonated every public servant I could think of. [43:06.000 --> 43:08.000] And then they all referred to him as a fire marshal. [43:08.000 --> 43:09.000] No, sir, you're not. [43:09.000 --> 43:11.000] That's what's stated down there. [43:11.000 --> 43:12.000] You're not a fire marshal. [43:12.000 --> 43:20.000] Okay, in law, what constitutes a fire marshal? [43:20.000 --> 43:24.000] And how is a fire marshal elected or appointed? [43:24.000 --> 43:29.000] How does the fire marshal take over his position? [43:29.000 --> 43:35.000] For starters, an actual fire marshal is defined and there is a position for such [43:35.000 --> 43:37.000] in the charter and ordinance. [43:37.000 --> 43:44.000] Even though that is an actual law. [43:44.000 --> 43:45.000] Okay, hang on. [43:45.000 --> 43:49.000] So that means this guy was actually impersonating a public official. [43:49.000 --> 43:51.000] That's a crime. [43:51.000 --> 43:53.000] Yeah. [43:53.000 --> 43:56.000] All right, well, we're just about to go to our sponsors and we'll talk some more [43:56.000 --> 44:01.000] about what this guy did on the other side. [44:01.000 --> 44:05.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [44:05.000 --> 44:06.000] of nutrition. [44:06.000 --> 44:09.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. [44:09.000 --> 44:11.000] And it's time we changed all that. [44:11.000 --> 44:16.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good [44:16.000 --> 44:17.000] nutrition. [44:17.000 --> 44:21.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, [44:21.000 --> 44:25.000] and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [44:25.000 --> 44:29.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, [44:29.000 --> 44:31.000] most of which we reject. [44:31.000 --> 44:36.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much we became a marketing distributor [44:36.000 --> 44:40.000] along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [44:40.000 --> 44:45.000] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help [44:45.000 --> 44:47.000] support quality radio. [44:47.000 --> 44:51.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [44:51.000 --> 44:56.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, [44:56.000 --> 44:59.000] and increase your income. [44:59.000 --> 45:01.000] Order now. [45:29.000 --> 45:34.000] This program was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning [45:34.000 --> 45:35.000] experience. [45:35.000 --> 45:40.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [45:40.000 --> 45:44.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:44.000 --> 45:49.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil [45:49.000 --> 45:53.000] cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [45:53.000 --> 45:57.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner. [45:57.000 --> 46:02.000] Toll free, 866-LAW-EZ. [46:02.000 --> 46:30.000] Music [46:30.000 --> 46:35.000] Music [46:35.000 --> 46:40.000] Music [46:40.000 --> 46:45.000] Music [46:45.000 --> 46:50.000] Music [46:50.000 --> 46:55.000] Music [46:55.000 --> 47:00.000] Music [47:00.000 --> 47:05.000] Music [47:05.000 --> 47:10.000] Music [47:10.000 --> 47:12.000] Okay, we are back. [47:12.000 --> 47:17.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Stephen in [47:17.000 --> 47:24.000] Texas about municipalities doing whatever they want to [47:24.000 --> 47:32.000] without scrupulously following the fine letter of law. [47:32.000 --> 47:33.000] Wow, Randy. [47:33.000 --> 47:37.000] You really think that could happen in good old America? [47:37.000 --> 47:43.000] Unfortunately, it is the norm rather than the exception. [47:43.000 --> 47:47.000] I would that it were the exception, but it's not. [47:47.000 --> 47:52.000] So Stephen, get your marching orders. [47:52.000 --> 47:58.000] Fine. Go to the city and ask them, give them an information request, [47:58.000 --> 48:09.000] requesting the date of the city council meeting where they approved. [48:09.000 --> 48:16.000] I'm still stuck on the case I was doing, but where they appointed this person [48:16.000 --> 48:20.000] as a deputy fire marshal. [48:20.000 --> 48:25.000] There was the other piece before that, too, about getting the minutes of the [48:25.000 --> 48:29.000] meeting where they created this commission that supposedly they are authorized [48:29.000 --> 48:37.000] to create, but you want to see where they created it. [48:37.000 --> 48:39.000] That should get them hopping up and down. [48:39.000 --> 48:42.000] What do you think, Steve? [48:42.000 --> 48:47.000] You guys turned me on to open government requests a long time ago. [48:47.000 --> 48:54.000] I've peppered them since they started on May, March of last year. [48:54.000 --> 48:58.000] I've probably gotten over 400 in a row on them. [48:58.000 --> 49:00.000] Have they violated any of those? [49:00.000 --> 49:03.000] Have they exceeded the 10-day time limit? [49:03.000 --> 49:04.000] Yes. [49:04.000 --> 49:08.000] Just getting some charges ready to start filing on that. [49:08.000 --> 49:11.000] Did you file criminal charges? [49:11.000 --> 49:13.000] Not on that one yet. [49:13.000 --> 49:19.000] I got that verified today. [49:19.000 --> 49:24.000] Who did you file it with? [49:24.000 --> 49:25.000] I haven't filed it. [49:25.000 --> 49:27.000] I just got it verified. [49:27.000 --> 49:31.000] That is the first one to the notary today, so he hasn't sent it off anywhere yet. [49:31.000 --> 49:32.000] Good, good, good. [49:32.000 --> 49:38.000] You want to take that to the district court. [49:38.000 --> 49:43.000] Find out when a district judge is sitting for hearings. [49:43.000 --> 49:44.000] Go into the court. [49:44.000 --> 49:50.000] I just did this Wednesday. [49:50.000 --> 49:51.000] I went into the court. [49:51.000 --> 49:54.000] The judge is having a trial. [49:54.000 --> 50:04.000] He declared a 15-minute recess, and I went up to the beta and handed him 15 criminal complaints. [50:04.000 --> 50:10.000] I said, instruct the judges I have business with the court and give him these. [50:10.000 --> 50:15.000] The beta takes them and gives them to the judge. [50:15.000 --> 50:21.000] The judge reads it, looks over them, and then he looked out at me and he said, what are these? [50:21.000 --> 50:23.000] Those are criminal affidavits. [50:23.000 --> 50:26.000] Well, what do you want me to do with them? [50:26.000 --> 50:30.000] He said, what do you want me to do? [50:30.000 --> 50:37.000] I want you to direct your clerk over here to swear me in, and I will verify every one of those criminal affidavits for you, [50:37.000 --> 50:45.000] and then I want you to do exactly what 15.09 commands you to do. [50:45.000 --> 50:49.000] He said, denied. [50:49.000 --> 50:55.000] He's got two sets of lawyers in there, some prosecutors and some lawyers for the defendants, [50:55.000 --> 50:58.000] and all these people standing around. [50:58.000 --> 51:03.000] This guy was a really arrogant jerk. [51:03.000 --> 51:09.000] I turned to the bailiff, Mr. Bailiff, I need you to arrest that judge. [51:09.000 --> 51:13.000] Oh, and it was so much fun. [51:13.000 --> 51:18.000] You haven't lived until you've done that. [51:18.000 --> 51:31.000] If the city council violates the Open Records Act, I did this in Hillsboro. [51:31.000 --> 51:35.000] Oh, you're Stephen? Yeah, I did this in Hillsboro. [51:35.000 --> 51:41.000] The sheriff, I gave him an information request, and his person handling that, [51:41.000 --> 51:51.000] I asked for all records collected to be maintained by the department that are referenced under 17.30, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. [51:51.000 --> 51:57.000] And what that is, it says after the examining trial, the magistrate shall seal all documents had in the hearing. [51:57.000 --> 52:02.000] The complaint, the statement of the witnesses, and all other documents shall be sealed in an envelope [52:02.000 --> 52:08.000] with the name of the magistrate written across the seal of the envelope and forwarded to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction. [52:08.000 --> 52:10.000] That's what it says. [52:10.000 --> 52:16.000] So his information officer sent me a request to clarify my request. [52:16.000 --> 52:24.000] And I said, well, certainly, just go to the Texas legislature and ask them what they intended when they wrote this legislation. [52:24.000 --> 52:27.000] So that hurt her feelings. [52:27.000 --> 52:32.000] And she sent me a response that says we have no records responsive to your request. [52:32.000 --> 52:40.000] So the day she sent it, I went to the district court and wrote out, I happened to be in town, [52:40.000 --> 52:48.000] wrote out a criminal complaint against the sheriff for violating the open meetings act, open records act, [52:48.000 --> 52:51.000] and gave it to the judge. [52:51.000 --> 52:57.000] Well, the judge finished his trial, just got up and walked out of the courtroom. [52:57.000 --> 53:00.000] Bad move, bubba. [53:00.000 --> 53:09.000] So as I was going down to Victoria County, I stopped by and filed criminal charges against the sheriff with the justice of the peace. [53:09.000 --> 53:16.000] And this justice of the peace is the one who does the morning magistration hearings. [53:16.000 --> 53:24.000] And I told him that the sheriff sent me a response saying that he had no records responsive to my request. [53:24.000 --> 53:32.000] But I know he has them because you gave them to him. [53:32.000 --> 53:38.000] He went in to do this magistration hearing and the sheriff gave him some records. [53:38.000 --> 53:44.000] He used those records to have the hearings and he gave them back to the sheriff. [53:44.000 --> 53:46.000] So I know the sheriff has them. [53:46.000 --> 53:56.000] This JP knows he has them because the JP tampered with a government document and conspired with the sheriff to tamper with a government document [53:56.000 --> 54:03.000] to give them back to the sheriff and secret them from the clerk of the court of jurisdiction. [54:03.000 --> 54:10.000] Oh, that is so much fun. [54:10.000 --> 54:13.000] Does it make sense what I'm talking about here? [54:13.000 --> 54:17.000] Yes, sir. [54:17.000 --> 54:21.000] Do the same thing to them. [54:21.000 --> 54:28.000] If you put in an information request and they do a request for an opinion from the state attorney general, [54:28.000 --> 54:33.000] they get to withhold the documents until they get an opinion. [54:33.000 --> 54:35.000] They've never gotten an opinion. [54:35.000 --> 54:47.000] Unless if they get a letter of opinion from the attorney general, a letter of opinion is not exactly an opinion. [54:47.000 --> 54:53.000] What it is is a brief of existing determinations. [54:53.000 --> 54:57.000] Sort of a pointer to something that they already published. [54:57.000 --> 54:59.000] Exactly. [54:59.000 --> 55:07.000] So the custodian of the record, before they withhold record for the purpose of making a request for an opinion, [55:07.000 --> 55:13.000] they have a duty to examine the record to determine if there are pre-existing determinations. [55:13.000 --> 55:30.000] If they fail to do that, then they have used the request as an excuse for delay for delay's sake, and you get to file against them. [55:30.000 --> 55:34.000] That's one they won't see coming. [55:34.000 --> 55:42.000] An attorney general's opinion is just a standard dodge to slow down your access. [55:42.000 --> 55:47.000] So if they don't get an original opinion, an original brief from the attorney general, [55:47.000 --> 55:56.000] but get references to other existing determinations, then you go for them criminally. [55:56.000 --> 56:01.000] Does that also apply to misappropriation of funds? [56:01.000 --> 56:04.000] Could you understand him? He was kind of muffled, Brett. [56:04.000 --> 56:11.000] Yeah, it is a little muffled, but he said, don't you think that would also be misappropriation of public funds? [56:11.000 --> 56:13.000] That is a good point. [56:13.000 --> 56:14.000] Yes. [56:14.000 --> 56:31.000] If you ask the attorney general to expend time and resources to send you a response when they have already prepared a response, I would say absolutely. [56:31.000 --> 56:41.000] I meant on the records, I meant on the public records officer themselves. [56:41.000 --> 56:46.000] And the county attorney or district attorney in between. [56:46.000 --> 56:47.000] Gotcha. [56:47.000 --> 56:51.000] And I really like to beat up attorneys on open records. [56:51.000 --> 57:02.000] I filed a request for the attorney wheel with the district court in Wise County, and I got a response from the county attorney. [57:02.000 --> 57:07.000] He sent in a request for an opinion from the state attorney general. [57:07.000 --> 57:15.000] So I want to know what the district judge, the district judge is a state official, he's not a county official. [57:15.000 --> 57:22.000] What in the heck is he doing using the county attorney to do his legal work for him? [57:22.000 --> 57:28.000] The county pays the county attorney, the state pays the district judge. [57:28.000 --> 57:34.000] That was misappropriation of public funds, and I filed criminally against both of them for it. [57:34.000 --> 57:37.000] Oh, that was so much fun. [57:37.000 --> 57:47.000] Another thing I like to do with these records requests, and it sounds like it might be right up your alley too, Stephen, is when they've kind of fumbled the ball a few times, [57:47.000 --> 57:54.000] or even just once, when you get the idea, these people are just not doing it right. [57:54.000 --> 58:05.000] Well, then you send them another records request that says, I want to see any records related to all the officers in your department, yourself included. [58:05.000 --> 58:08.000] Now, obviously, you're always sending this to the head honcho, right? [58:08.000 --> 58:10.000] But there might be a helper that they've designated. [58:10.000 --> 58:26.000] So I want to see any records that shows that you've been properly participating in compliance with the open records training as mandated by Government Code 552.012 subsection B. [58:26.000 --> 58:33.000] And tell them you want to see the past three years' worth of training certificates. [58:33.000 --> 58:42.000] So that anybody who's required to have training every year on how to handle records requests to see that they've done so. [58:42.000 --> 58:45.000] Because obviously, they're clueless. They've been messing up. They don't know what they're doing. [58:45.000 --> 58:47.000] So you need to see that. [58:47.000 --> 58:50.000] All right. We'll go to our sponsors. [58:50.000 --> 58:54.000] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? [58:54.000 --> 59:01.000] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help. [59:01.000 --> 59:06.000] The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today. [59:06.000 --> 59:13.000] It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [59:13.000 --> 59:18.000] The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. [59:18.000 --> 59:27.000] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the Church. [59:27.000 --> 59:40.000] To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102. [59:40.000 --> 01:00:01.000] That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:00:01.000 --> 01:00:05.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:10.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it. [01:00:10.000 --> 01:00:16.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:22.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:27.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:35.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [01:00:35.000 --> 01:00:42.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:46.000] Start over with Startpage. [01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:52.000] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers and find a third party there. [01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:55.000] He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. [01:00:55.000 --> 01:01:01.000] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent. [01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:07.000] It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. [01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:10.000] Third party? Third Amendment? Get it? [01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:17.000] So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment. [01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:31.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:35.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:40.000] They guarantee you the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it. [01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:47.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:52.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:01:52.000 --> 01:01:57.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:01:57.000 --> 01:02:02.000] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:05.000] Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. [01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:12.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:16.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:22.000] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles. [01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:27.000] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. [01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:31.000] Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it? [01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:35.000] Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security. [01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:40.000] Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. [01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:47.000] When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells. [01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:54.000] Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. [01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:01.000] Look after Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:44.000] Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelkin, Brett Fountain, Lou La Radio, and we're talking to Stephen and Hillsborough. [01:03:44.000 --> 01:03:58.000] Oh, this is the 9th day of December, 2022. Friday, the 9th day of December, 2022 on our four-hour info marathon. [01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:06.000] We are one hour in. We've got a full board of callers, but once we finish with a caller and someone drops off, [01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:14.000] if you have a question or comment, give us a call, 512-646-1984. Stephen? [01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:19.000] I can get off now, you guys. I'll let you take somebody else. [01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:26.000] Okay, well, I was just talking to Brett about that on the break. He said, you know, we've got a full board of callers. [01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:29.000] And I appreciate everybody that's calling. [01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:36.000] But I hope that everyone that's calling appreciates the fact that this is a teaching show. [01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:45.000] And when I get a caller that gives us a good topic where we can address some nice, sophisticated issues, [01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:51.000] I spend time with them. And there are very few shows on the air that have that luxury. [01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:55.000] Alex Jones, he has to spend just a few seconds with everybody. [01:04:55.000 --> 01:05:01.000] So he answers one question or takes one comment and then blows them off and goes to somebody else. [01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:08.000] We don't do that. And I'm not here, Brett and I are not here to give free legal advice. [01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:14.000] We do give our opinions on legal issues, but that's not really our purpose. [01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:22.000] Our purpose is really to present the legal system and how it works. [01:05:22.000 --> 01:05:32.000] And like with yours, I especially like it when we can go into depth on legal issues [01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:39.000] so that our listeners begin to understand how to take these issues apart piece by piece. [01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:43.000] So I appreciate your questions. I appreciate your time. [01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:50.000] And anybody who's upset with us for spending too much time on one caller, [01:05:50.000 --> 01:05:57.000] I hope you appreciate the fact that when we get a caller that brings us a bunch of BS, [01:05:57.000 --> 01:06:00.000] we don't spend much time with them. [01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:06.000] We tend to blow them off and look for callers who bring us really interesting legal questions. [01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:09.000] And thank you, Stephen, for your time. [01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:19.000] And now we're going to go to what Brett, the 602, is that the first time caller? [01:06:19.000 --> 01:06:27.000] Yes. Yes. Okay. If you are in the 602 area code, our system shows Isaac, [01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:37.000] but that's the phone company recognizing the number. [01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:41.000] Give us your first name and state. [01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:44.000] Isaac, Arizona. [01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:51.000] Okay. So it was right. I looked up 602 and it was Arizona, but I didn't want to be presumptuous. [01:06:51.000 --> 01:06:55.000] Okay. What do you have for us today? [01:06:55.000 --> 01:07:03.000] So I have an interesting question. It's about barred grievances. [01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:13.000] When I was doing some due diligence on somebody that did my taxes in the CPA, [01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:16.000] it happens to be attorneys. [01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:23.000] And I'm not there yet, but I'm not going to be filing barred grievances, [01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:29.000] but it crosses state lines like a couple of states. [01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:36.000] Now they do the taxes in here or they do California or another state. [01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:44.000] Are you saying the lawyers as accountants work in more than one state? [01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:49.000] Correct. And they've got like different partners, some of them are attorneys [01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:52.000] and some of them are not. And they're all over the place. [01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:57.000] And I'm just trying to figure out like, do you bar and grieve them too? [01:07:57.000 --> 01:08:03.000] Or do you just, just the people that kind of, because we didn't have direct connection [01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:11.000] all the time, but with the people underneath them, so to speak. [01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:18.000] So is this like an accounting firm and they're kind of spread all out all over the place? [01:08:18.000 --> 01:08:19.000] Correct. [01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:25.000] Okay. And then some of them have lawyers, probably whoever's a lawyer in Arizona [01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:28.000] is not the same person who's admitted to the bar in California. [01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:32.000] They'll have somebody else over there. Is that kind of what I'm understanding? [01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:34.000] Exactly. Yes. [01:08:34.000 --> 01:08:45.000] Okay. But is the lawyer acting for the whatever company, if it's the accounting agency, [01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:53.000] are they acting in the state of Arizona? Is that where you're at? [01:08:53.000 --> 01:08:59.000] Yes. They're acting here, but the license is the bar. [01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:07.000] Okay. If they're acting in Arizona and they are promoting themselves as lawyers, [01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:12.000] they have to be member of the bar in Arizona. [01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:18.000] Oh boy. Because he's not, one of them is not, but he promoted here [01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:21.000] and he promoted in the other state. [01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:31.000] Is he performing acts that can only be performed by a bar card carrying attorney? [01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:34.000] That's a great question. I wouldn't know that. [01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:40.000] Accounting, they require an accounting license, but not a bar license. [01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:46.000] Now, and a lawyer who has a bar license can do accounting, [01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:58.000] but that has nothing to do with his license. His license merely says that he has to be accredited as an accountant. [01:09:58.000 --> 01:10:05.000] But if he says he's a lawyer, that doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the fact that he's an accountant. [01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:14.000] He has to be accredited or licensed or whatever they do in Arizona to be a professional accountant. [01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:20.000] The lawyer thing, he can be a lawyer, he can be a father, he can be a drug dealer, [01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:25.000] he can be all kinds of other things while being an accountant. [01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:28.000] And those other things are, they may sound good on his resume, [01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:38.000] but they're irrelevant as concerns the function he's performing. Does that make sense? [01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:49.000] Yes. Do they have to be physically helping or do they have somebody that's in charge or their partner? [01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:53.000] Yeah, they can have someone else do it, but they're responsible. [01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:59.000] If they're the licensee, they can have a paralegal work with you. [01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:06.000] But the paralegal works under the licensee, and the licensee is responding at Superior. [01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:10.000] The licensee is the one who is responsible. [01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:12.000] Okay, got it. [01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:18.000] But take into account what Randy's saying about the functions that they're performing, too. [01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:23.000] Because if you're not sure, maybe they are just performing some accounting functions. [01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:29.000] And just because he's a lawyer, so you hire somebody to come do some electrical work in your garage, [01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:37.000] but he happens to also be a private pilot, you're not going to go and complain to the FAA about him. [01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:39.000] Right? [01:11:39.000 --> 01:11:43.000] Does that make sense? [01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:46.000] Oh, wait. You're muted. Hold on. [01:11:46.000 --> 01:11:50.000] Okay. Wait a minute. Hold on. We lost him. [01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:53.000] Yeah, he dropped off the board, but he came back. Let's get him. [01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:56.000] Okay. I should get the bottom. [01:11:56.000 --> 01:11:58.000] Okay. [01:11:58.000 --> 01:11:59.000] Okay, we got you back, guys. [01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:06.000] I don't know if you heard me, Isaac. It looks like he dropped off the board. Are you back? [01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:10.000] I'm sorry? [01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:14.000] Go ahead, Brett. I couldn't hear you. I couldn't hear what you said. [01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:22.000] Okay. So I was saying just pay attention to what Randy was saying about the functions being performed. [01:12:22.000 --> 01:12:31.000] Because just because he's a lawyer doesn't mean you bargain him. I mean, if he's only performing the accounting functions. [01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:36.000] Like the example I was giving, if you have an electrician come out to do something in your garage, [01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:44.000] and then he happens to also be a private pilot, you're not going to really go complain to the FAA about his electrical work. [01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:47.000] Right? [01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:48.000] Got it. [01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:59.000] It's like when I get pulled over, and the policeman asks me for my license, and I give him my pilot's license. [01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:06.000] Yeah, I am a licensed pilot, but I'm not using that license right now. I was in Austin and got pulled over by a policeman. [01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:14.000] He asked me if I had a license, and I said, yes, I do. But I'm not using it right now. [01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:24.000] And that's what this case was. The guy may be licensed as an attorney, but he's doing something else, so he's not using it right now. [01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:36.000] Let's see. Okay. That shined a lot of light. Thank you. Thank you, guys, for what you do. It's very educational. [01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:38.000] Okay. Do you have anything else for us? [01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:42.000] That's it. That's all. It was a simple question. [01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:52.000] Okay. Thank you, Isaac. Now we're going to go into Nancy in Pennsylvania. Hello, Nancy. What do you have for us today? [01:13:52.000 --> 01:14:12.000] Hi. Glad to be here. I'm someone who did, despite a Road Pirates ticket, and with the help of you and Brett and other people, and prevailed. [01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:17.000] Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Prevailed? You went by that too fast. [01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:24.000] The thing went silent. The thing went silent after two and a half months. [01:14:24.000 --> 01:14:33.000] Okay. Hold on. Hold on. What they're likely to do is come back two years later with a vengeance. [01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:44.000] Don't let them go silent. Stay on them. Press them to dismiss. [01:14:44.000 --> 01:14:52.000] What they'll do is they'll go silent. They'll issue a notice to a peer and not send it to you. [01:14:52.000 --> 01:15:00.000] And then when you don't show up to a hearing you didn't know anything about, then they'll issue a failure to a peer. [01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:05.000] And the next time you get pulled over for a ticket, they'll slap the cuffs on you. [01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:10.000] Ask him how he knows. Out of date. [01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:16.000] That's even worse. [01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:25.000] Don't let them go silent. Push them for a dismissal. [01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:31.000] Okay. What state is the issue in? [01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:36.000] It was in Massachusetts. [01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:41.000] Well, it's not too far from PA. [01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:46.000] If Massachusetts went silent, you should file a motion to dismiss. [01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:50.000] For how long have they been silent? [01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:58.000] Well, I did file a motion to dismiss way back last September, like September 2021. [01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:01.000] And they never, they wouldn't deal with it. [01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:06.000] Okay, file a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. [01:16:06.000 --> 01:16:12.000] And then when the judge does not dismiss, then you file a judicial conduct complaint, [01:16:12.000 --> 01:16:19.000] accusing the judge of failing to maintain his docket. [01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:27.000] We, one of the only times we actually got the judicial conduct commission to act [01:16:27.000 --> 01:16:34.000] was in New York where a guy complained, this is Chris in Albany, [01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:45.000] complained that the court failed to prosecute and now the issue was too old to prosecute [01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:49.000] and the judge failed to maintain his calendar. [01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:55.000] And the court of the judicial conduct commission actually sanctioned him. [01:16:55.000 --> 01:17:00.000] Hang on, we'll be right back. [01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:30.000] We'll be right back. [01:17:56.000 --> 01:18:01.000] I love logos. [01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:05.000] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:07.000] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [01:18:07.000 --> 01:18:08.000] I need my truth fixed. [01:18:08.000 --> 01:18:10.000] I'd be lost without logos. [01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:13.000] And I really want to help keep this network on the air. [01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:16.000] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite [01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:20.000] and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [01:18:20.000 --> 01:18:22.000] How can I help logos? [01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:24.000] Well, I'm glad you asked. [01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:27.000] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. [01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:31.000] When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, the first thing you do is clear your cookies. [01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:34.000] Now, go to logosradionetwork.com. [01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:37.000] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:43.000] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. [01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:44.000] Do I pay extra? [01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:45.000] No. [01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:47.000] Do you have to do anything different when I order? [01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:48.000] No. [01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:49.000] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [01:18:49.000 --> 01:18:50.000] No. [01:18:50.000 --> 01:18:51.000] I mean, yes. [01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:54.000] Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money. [01:18:54.000 --> 01:18:55.000] This is perfect. [01:18:55.000 --> 01:18:57.000] Thank you so much. [01:18:57.000 --> 01:18:58.000] We are welcome. [01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:01.000] Happy holidays, logos. [01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000] This is the Logos Radio Net. [01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:21.000] Thank you. [01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:54.000] Okay, we are back. [01:19:54.000 --> 01:20:00.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, and this is our four hour info marathon. [01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:04.000] The ninth day of December, 2022. [01:20:04.000 --> 01:20:06.000] And we have two callers on the board. [01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:08.000] We have room for two more. [01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:15.000] So if you have a question or comment, give us a call, 512-646-1984, [01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:18.000] and we are talking to Nancy in Pennsylvania. [01:20:18.000 --> 01:20:21.000] And Brett, you were talking to her when we went out, [01:20:21.000 --> 01:20:26.000] and I was kind of hovering over there waiting for you to run off the cliff, [01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:29.000] and you didn't do it. [01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:32.000] I thought it was the other way around. [01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:36.000] No, this was my turn. [01:20:36.000 --> 01:20:41.000] So Nancy, you were saying that you had a motion to dismiss, [01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:46.000] and then Randy was talking about a failure to maintain a docket [01:20:46.000 --> 01:20:51.000] is something that actually got a judicial misconduct discipline action, [01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:55.000] which is really rare. [01:20:55.000 --> 01:21:01.000] It is extremely rare for us to get the commission to actually act. [01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:03.000] But let me give you a little bit of insight. [01:21:03.000 --> 01:21:07.000] I have a friend whose brother is a lawyer, [01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:13.000] and he, just to make a few extra bucks, he became a municipal judge. [01:21:13.000 --> 01:21:18.000] And Ken was talking to him once about some judicial conduct complaints [01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:25.000] I had filed against a city municipal judge. [01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:29.000] And his brother said, oh, man, you shouldn't do that. [01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:36.000] This judicial conduct commission, they only take action against these lower court judges. [01:21:36.000 --> 01:21:38.000] They don't go after the higher judges. [01:21:38.000 --> 01:21:43.000] We're the only ones they beat up. [01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:49.000] Now, that may not be true, but that's what these lower courts feel. [01:21:49.000 --> 01:21:54.000] They think that the commission doesn't go after the higher level judges. [01:21:54.000 --> 01:22:00.000] They just go after the lower level judges so it'll look like they're doing something. [01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:04.000] So even if they don't go after the judge, [01:22:04.000 --> 01:22:10.000] when you file on these lower level judges, it really gets their attention. [01:22:10.000 --> 01:22:13.000] Okay, go ahead. I'm going to shut up now. [01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:16.000] Well, they never would process my motion to dismiss. [01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:22.000] I tried and tried, so what I ended up doing was filing judicial complaints. [01:22:22.000 --> 01:22:32.000] And then the registry took over and sent another bill saying I owed $100 more, [01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:36.000] and I filed mail fraud. [01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:41.000] First, I had asked, you know, who's requesting this money, [01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:44.000] because it just said it was a collection center [01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:47.000] and turned out to be the Registry of Motor Vehicles. [01:22:47.000 --> 01:22:57.000] And so I sent off mail fraud, and the court prevented my email, [01:22:57.000 --> 01:23:04.000] so I sent a record request who communicated to shut off my email address. [01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:09.000] Everything they did wrong, I followed up with a criminal complaint, [01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:20.000] so on the court and bar grievance on the Motor Vehicle Registry lawyer. [01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:24.000] Way to go, Nancy, way to go. [01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:31.000] Yeah, I did a notice of claim, and it was almost written like a pleading. [01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:36.000] Okay, hold on, hold on, notice of claim. [01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:43.000] That sounds like a tort letter to me. [01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:50.000] Yes, I sent it to risk management and head of the state who oversees all the judges [01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:58.000] that I dealt with, the Registry of Motor Vehicles, and the state troopers. [01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:02.000] And of course, I had filed a post complaint because, you know, [01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:08.000] the trooper was just nasty and agitated, unprofessional, so yeah. [01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:20.000] So I think I covered a lot of bases, and I also brought the notice of claim copies [01:24:20.000 --> 01:24:25.000] and federal criminal complaints to the FBI, to the state AG, [01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:29.000] and the county DA, state criminal complaints as well. [01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:33.000] I studied Massachusetts statutes and law. [01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:39.000] I had everything in a timeline with all matching laws that were violated. [01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:42.000] It was pretty thorough. [01:24:42.000 --> 01:24:46.000] I'm in love. [01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:47.000] Yeah. [01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:49.000] You're why we do this show. [01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:54.000] Pennsylvania doesn't care about out-of-state speeding tickets [01:24:54.000 --> 01:24:57.000] if there was no crime involved. [01:24:57.000 --> 01:25:02.000] And, you know, my notice of claim also just set the stage for I was not under [01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:08.000] commerce, a federal code was applied to me, you know, all the law that, [01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:14.000] starting from the Constitution of the state of Massachusetts to the United States [01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:21.000] and on down into Massachusetts law, and also because I had assault on a 60-year [01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:27.000] I had just turned 60 years old four days before, and so I found Massachusetts [01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:33.000] law that said assault on people 60 years or more is a special crime. [01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:36.000] So yeah, I had the notice of claim. [01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:41.000] So I think with everything that everyone helped me to do, [01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:44.000] I got the message clear to the state of Massachusetts, [01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:46.000] and everything landed on November 15th. [01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:51.000] It was a funny thing, too, in Worcester and Boston. [01:25:51.000 --> 01:25:58.000] And I think, you know, my gut told me that they got the message that if they [01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:01.000] want to pursue this, they have a lot of... [01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:02.000] Wait a minute. [01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:08.000] You have set the stage, but you haven't stepped up on it. [01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:13.000] Have you sued them in their personal capacity? [01:26:13.000 --> 01:26:16.000] Would that be a 42-1983? [01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:17.000] No, no, no, no. [01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:18.000] You don't need to do that. [01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:21.000] First thing you want to do is sue them in the state. [01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:25.000] If a public official fails to perform a duty they're required to perform [01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:29.000] and denies you full and free access to or enjoyment of a right, [01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:35.000] in Pennsylvania, that's a criminal act. [01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:42.000] And no one can claim immunity from civil litigation for committing crimes [01:26:42.000 --> 01:26:49.000] because no one has the power to indemnify a criminal, [01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:53.000] even if he carries the moniker of a judge. [01:26:53.000 --> 01:26:59.000] Have you considered filing a civil action against them? [01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:10.000] Yes, but then my husband's employer was forcing a jab or threat of loss of job, [01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:14.000] so then I had to get involved in that. [01:27:14.000 --> 01:27:16.000] So it's been one thing after another. [01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:17.000] Okay. [01:27:17.000 --> 01:27:20.000] Welcome to our world. [01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:25.000] For anybody out there who is considering taking on the legal system, [01:27:25.000 --> 01:27:28.000] it gets very busy. [01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:30.000] It's not easy. [01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:34.000] And I'm listening to all the things you've done, Nancy. [01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:37.000] You have really been after them, and it's a lot of work. [01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:43.000] For those of you who have never done it, it is a lot of work to get to where Nancy's at. [01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:48.000] But you're at the point now where you can turn the corner. [01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:56.000] Up to this point you've been playing defense against an overwhelming enemy. [01:27:56.000 --> 01:28:02.000] Everything changes when you file suit against them. [01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:07.000] You file against them, you become the plaintiff, they become the defendant, [01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:12.000] and they're the ones that has to do the song and dance. [01:28:12.000 --> 01:28:16.000] You might think about where can I sue these guys? [01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:25.000] Where did a public official exert or purport to exert an authority he did not expressly have [01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:31.000] or failed to perform a duty he is required to perform? [01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:37.000] In either case, if they denied you the full and free access to or enjoyment of a right, [01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:40.000] that's a crime in every state. [01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:46.000] And if they committed a crime against you, they cannot claim official immunity. [01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:52.000] No official is allowed to commit crimes. [01:28:52.000 --> 01:28:54.000] So you sue them personally. [01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:58.000] If you want to change these things, if you want to get this fixed, [01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:02.000] go in there and ask them to do things you know they're not going to do [01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:08.000] so that you can then turn around and sue them personally. [01:29:08.000 --> 01:29:09.000] What do you think? [01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:11.000] So they didn't respond to my record request. [01:29:11.000 --> 01:29:19.000] I had two record requests, three, and none of them got – well, [01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:25.000] one got responded to but it was 25 days late, and the other two never got responded to. [01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:27.000] So there's that right there. [01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:34.000] What does the Open Records Act in Pennsylvania say about the time limits? [01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:38.000] And what is the nature of the Open Records Act? [01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:45.000] In Texas, the Open Records Act is not a civil statute. [01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:52.000] The Open Records Act is 552 Government Code, and it's also 552 in the FAT. [01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:55.000] A number of states use the same number. [01:29:55.000 --> 01:30:02.000] Texas is under 552.353. [01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:06.000] Sorry, soft drink lovers, even diet drinks can make you fat. [01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:11.000] A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff. [01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:12.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:17.000] I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas. [01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:19.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:27.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:35.000] Privacy – it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:38.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:30:38.000 --> 01:30:42.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:45.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:50.000] Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? [01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:51.000] Wrong. [01:30:51.000 --> 01:30:56.000] Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade. [01:30:56.000 --> 01:31:00.000] They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines [01:31:00.000 --> 01:31:03.000] five times more than no soda at all. [01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:06.000] The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, [01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:10.000] but unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to squelch it. [01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:13.000] Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, [01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:16.000] which can result in a larger overall calorie intake. [01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:19.000] So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight, [01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:24.000] and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead. [01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:30.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:36.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:48.000] Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:50.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:53.000] I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:57.000] I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:01.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:05.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [01:32:05.000 --> 01:32:07.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, [01:32:07.000 --> 01:32:09.000] and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, [01:32:09.000 --> 01:32:12.000] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:15.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:17.000] the right to act in our own private capacity, [01:32:17.000 --> 01:32:19.000] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [01:32:19.000 --> 01:32:22.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity [01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:25.000] to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [01:32:25.000 --> 01:32:28.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:31.000] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [01:32:31.000 --> 01:32:33.000] that will help you understand what due process is [01:32:33.000 --> 01:32:35.000] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [01:32:35.000 --> 01:32:37.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material [01:32:37.000 --> 01:32:40.000] by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:42.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, [01:32:42.000 --> 01:32:47.000] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:50.000] hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:54.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [01:32:54.000 --> 01:33:00.000] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:33:00.000 --> 01:33:12.000] Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:33:30.000 --> 01:33:47.000] The wicked come with temptations They're trying to buy the whole place [01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:58.000] They want to force the nation Because they've fallen from grace [01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:09.000] I will not drink from that cup I just can't act out of way [01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:19.000] They got this problem they're dreaming of I won't be the slave come what may [01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:29.000] Because I will not drink from that cup I just can't act out of way [01:34:49.000 --> 01:34:54.000] But you're at the point to where you sound like you're at the top of the jail. [01:34:54.000 --> 01:34:59.000] And now it's time to shift gears. [01:34:59.000 --> 01:35:03.000] They were the plaintiff up to this point. [01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:06.000] Now it's your turn to become the plaintiff. [01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:09.000] Yeah, and how do you do that across the state? [01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:11.000] Wait, say that again? [01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:16.000] How do you do that when you're six hours away from where the event happened? [01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:20.000] Brett, can you understand that? I'm having a little trouble with the fidelity. [01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:26.000] Yeah, her audio, your audio is a little bit fuzzy there, but she's asking you, [01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:31.000] how do you do that when you're six hours away from where it happened? [01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:36.000] A six-hour drive. [01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:44.000] Can you find a federal claim? [01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:50.000] Did they violate any of your federally protected rights? [01:35:50.000 --> 01:35:52.000] Yes. [01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:56.000] Then sue them in the federal court local. [01:35:56.000 --> 01:36:00.000] Federal court does not want to see you. [01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:08.000] I have helped over 700 people file federal lawsuits primarily in foreclosure issues. [01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:15.000] Never once did anybody have to appear in the federal court. [01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:19.000] The judges in the federal court do not want to see you. [01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:24.000] They want to do everything by the documentation, and that's how I want it done. [01:36:24.000 --> 01:36:29.000] So look for any federal claim you can make. [01:36:29.000 --> 01:36:33.000] It doesn't matter if you can win it or not, just so you can make it. [01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:41.000] And file in the federal court local and drag them over here to where you're at. [01:36:41.000 --> 01:36:43.000] Okay. [01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:49.000] It is a really big difference when you're going after them. [01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:53.000] Everything changes. That's the fun part. [01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:57.000] And it sounds like you've done all the difficult part. [01:36:57.000 --> 01:37:01.000] You've touched off the bases, you've addressed all the issues, [01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:05.000] and they have denied you due process the whole time. [01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:09.000] And due process is kind of a catch-all. [01:37:09.000 --> 01:37:12.000] Go ahead. [01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:18.000] If you have had more than one person act in concert inclusion, one with the other, [01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:29.000] toward an ongoing criminal conspiracy to deprive you in any federal constitutionally protected right, [01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:34.000] and one of the primary ones is due process. [01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:37.000] You have the right to due process of law. [01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:40.000] If they have failed to perform a duty they're required to perform, [01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:44.000] and in the process now you have full free access to enjoyment of right, [01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:50.000] you can claim that in the Fed under 18 U.S. Code 242. [01:37:50.000 --> 01:38:01.000] And 18 U.S. Code 242, a violation under that, gives you access to 42 U.S. Code 1983, which you mentioned. [01:38:01.000 --> 01:38:06.000] You can drag them into the federal court where you're at. [01:38:06.000 --> 01:38:12.000] And then they have to hire a lawyer to represent them in the federal court. [01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:15.000] What state were you from? Was it Massachusetts? [01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:17.000] Yeah. [01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:22.000] They have to come to Massachusetts. They have to hire a Massachusetts lawyer. [01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:27.000] Well, what's that lawyer going to do when you bar-grieve him into the Stone Age? [01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:30.000] He's going to tell them to go scratch. [01:38:30.000 --> 01:38:34.000] They have to hire another lawyer for a lot more money. [01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:37.000] And you bar-grieve him into the Stone Age. [01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:41.000] You have so much more power. [01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:45.000] You've been playing defense this whole time. [01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:50.000] And you manage to make it through defense. [01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:54.000] Now it's time to go on the offense. [01:38:54.000 --> 01:38:57.000] Actually, I like to go on the offense real early. [01:38:57.000 --> 01:39:00.000] And the way you go on the offense early is with criminal complaints. [01:39:00.000 --> 01:39:08.000] And what happens when you start filing criminal complaints is all the officials in Pennsylvania [01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:14.000] who have a duty to act will refuse to because you're filing against public officials [01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:18.000] and all of these officials have their snouts in the same trough. [01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:25.000] So you can expect them to violate their oath of office in order to protect your buddies. [01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:30.000] And that's a good thing because now you get to drag them into federal court. [01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:35.000] And when you got the local prosecutor explaining to a federal judge [01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:42.000] why he didn't pursue a criminal prosecution against someone who obviously violated law [01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:46.000] just because he was a public official. [01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:49.000] Good luck with that, Bubba. [01:39:49.000 --> 01:39:55.000] The federal courts are not incredibly lenient to the states. [01:39:55.000 --> 01:40:04.000] So look at your case and where can you make a federal claim of denial of due process [01:40:04.000 --> 01:40:06.000] and then drag them into federal courts. [01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:12.000] You've been dealing with these lower level courts and they are absolute snakes in the grass. [01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:19.000] When you file in the federal court, you will find this is a whole other animal. [01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:22.000] These guys are pros. [01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:28.000] They don't do all this ignorant stuff the municipal courts do. [01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:36.000] They are much more professional and they won't tolerate a bunch of crapola from these municipal courts. [01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:42.000] You'll find this is much more fun and much more fulfilling. [01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:47.000] And you will have a much greater impact. [01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:49.000] Does that make sense? [01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:57.000] This happened a year ago, like August 2021 and then went through November 2021. [01:40:57.000 --> 01:41:01.000] So is there statute of limitations on this? [01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:04.000] Okay, let's talk about statute of limitations. [01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:08.000] The statute of limitations doesn't start. [01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:19.000] The clock doesn't start in a court case until the case is finally adjudicated. [01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:24.000] You're claiming that they're acting in violation of Constitution [01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:27.000] and the case is still going on. [01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:32.000] If the case is going on when you file, the clock hasn't even started yet. [01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:42.000] And even once it does start, if you exceed the statute of limitations, limitations is not a bar. [01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:49.000] I had one case where the judge said he's going to dismiss this because it exceeded the statute of limitations. [01:41:49.000 --> 01:41:54.000] I said, what? That's not your place, Bubba. [01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:58.000] Statute of limitations is not a bar to prosecution. [01:41:58.000 --> 01:42:05.000] Statute of limitations is an affirmative defense that must be planned. [01:42:05.000 --> 01:42:10.000] So if you have a two-year statute of limitations and you sue somebody 10 years later, [01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:16.000] if they don't object to the time, they waived it. [01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:20.000] The judge has no power to raise it himself. [01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:29.000] In fact, the very fact that he would is harmful because then that makes the other side say, oh, yeah, that's why I object to that. [01:42:29.000 --> 01:42:34.000] I'm going to raise this defense because he brought it up. [01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:39.000] That should move to disqualify the judge and then sue the judge. [01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:42.000] I've only found this in one place. [01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:48.000] I started to say we, but I didn't because I don't know if somebody else has found it. [01:42:48.000 --> 01:42:53.000] But in Texas, we have a case, Walker v. Packer. [01:42:53.000 --> 01:42:59.000] And it is a case that should apply to every single jurisdiction. [01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:12.000] What it says is a judge has no discretion in properly applying the law to the facts of failure to do so as an abuse of discretion. [01:43:12.000 --> 01:43:24.000] Well, an abuse of discretion in any state that has the effect of denying the citizen in the full and free access to her enjoyment of right is a criminal act, [01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:30.000] an act of official misconduct. In Texas, it's called official oppression. [01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:34.000] And it's definitely a crime in the Fed. [01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:55.000] So the fact that it says that they have no discretion when a judge has no discretion, that's an administrative act for which he has no immunity. [01:43:55.000 --> 01:44:00.000] Hang on, Andy Kelton, Brett Fountain. We'll be right back. [01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:06.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [01:44:06.000 --> 01:44:11.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:17.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:44:17.000 --> 01:44:25.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:31.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:39.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:47.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:51.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:44:51.000 --> 01:44:58.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:00.000] Order now. [01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:07.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, [01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:15.000] the affordable, easy-to-understand, core CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:16.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EASY. [01:46:22.000 --> 01:46:43.000] Okay, we are back. [01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:52.000] Brandon Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Nancy in Pennsylvania. No, you're not in Pennsylvania. You're in Massachusetts, right? [01:46:52.000 --> 01:46:56.000] No, the opposite. I'm in Pennsylvania. [01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:59.000] And your issues in Massachusetts? [01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:02.000] I'm from there originally, yes. [01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:13.000] Okay. Brett reminded me that, you know, when I was talking about taking the state to the Fed, Brett is doing just exactly that. [01:47:13.000 --> 01:47:17.000] Will you explain what you're doing, Brett? [01:47:17.000 --> 01:47:23.000] Sure. You were talking about due process and how that could be a claim for her. [01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:30.000] What would you do, Randy? What would you think about a prosecutor who says to the judge, [01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:35.000] well, Judge, due process, he's insisting on due process, that's just ludicrous. [01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:43.000] That's a civil matter. That's for civil issues only. This is a criminal matter. Traffic is criminal in Texas. [01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:51.000] And he's talking about due process while that's civil. What do you think about a prosecutor like that? [01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:57.000] Brain dead? That comes to mind very quickly. [01:47:57.000 --> 01:48:05.000] I told the federal court that this guy is committing aggravated perjury. [01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:14.000] He's lying to that poor, unsuspecting justice of the peace and thereby depriving me of my due process rights. [01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:18.000] And he's lied about a material fact. [01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:25.000] Yes. And he's lied about a lot of stuff. He's actually not even a prosecutor. But so that was another lie. [01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:35.000] I've got 15 counts of aggravated perjury in this lawsuit. And all of them, nothing is about the traffic ticket. [01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:45.000] It's all about his aggravated perjury that deprived me of my due process rights. [01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:51.000] So have you filed criminally against the lawyer? [01:48:51.000 --> 01:49:01.000] I've got some notarized here that I haven't started spreading around yet. [01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:09.000] That would be at the state level, right? Did I do any federal ones? [01:49:09.000 --> 01:49:11.000] Almost certainly. [01:49:11.000 --> 01:49:19.000] I haven't done any federal ones. I've got a federal one here against the DPS director. [01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:25.000] Nancy, at the end of the day, it's not about law. [01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:34.000] You can never expect to win your case simply because you have the law and the facts on your side. [01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:40.000] To think so is naive. It is not that way now. [01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:46.000] Never has been that way so long as we have had human beings for judges. [01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:55.000] You can expect to win your case if you have the politics on your side and all politics is local. [01:49:55.000 --> 01:50:01.000] So when I first say that, that sounds horrible. But it's not horrible. [01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:07.000] It's only a problem if you don't understand that it's all political. [01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:16.000] Once you understand that it's all political, then you take this myriad of criminal complaints, [01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:22.000] criminal issues you have available to you, and you look at them and say, [01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:30.000] okay, which one of these will bring me political leverage? [01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:37.000] And when you start operating from that perspective, it's like playing poker with the courts [01:50:37.000 --> 01:50:43.000] because everything in poker is about emotional leverage. [01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:47.000] Look at all the things they have done. [01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:58.000] Then make up the most horrible story you can think of that incorporates all of these issues and facts. [01:50:58.000 --> 01:51:06.000] And then take the facts that doesn't lead to your story, that doesn't enhance it. [01:51:06.000 --> 01:51:10.000] They do so many things wrong. You just can't get to all of them. [01:51:10.000 --> 01:51:18.000] So we need to be able to create a plausible scenario based on the facts. [01:51:18.000 --> 01:51:26.000] When I do a lawsuit, the statement of facts is the last thing I do. [01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:35.000] The first thing I do is a timeline, and that's just to keep everything oriented in time. [01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:42.000] When you're in these kinds of situations, you tend to move around in them emotionally. [01:51:42.000 --> 01:51:48.000] And emotionally is not always time-related. [01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:51.000] You'll tell somebody about what happened. [01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:57.000] Oh, they did this, and they'll ask you a question. Oh, yeah, they did this other, and they did this other. [01:51:57.000 --> 01:52:00.000] The problem with memory is you don't read memory. [01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:07.000] We don't go inside and read memory. We take the memory out and we experience it in the telling. [01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:16.000] And if we're telling the incident to someone to whom certain aspects of it are not relevant, we don't bring those up. [01:52:16.000 --> 01:52:31.000] And then we put the memory back, and it goes back with those issues that weren't relevant to the telling are set a step away from the memory. [01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:36.000] We don't go in and read it. We take it out, re-experience it, and put it back. [01:52:36.000 --> 01:52:39.000] So it tends to get jumbled around. [01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:43.000] So the first thing we need is a timeline. This happened, this happened, this happened, this happened. [01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:50.000] You do a basic timeline first. Don't worry about getting everything, just the big deals that happened. [01:52:50.000 --> 01:52:58.000] And then go look at one of the big deals and look at what happened before it and what were the littler things, the smaller things that happened in between this. [01:52:58.000 --> 01:53:06.000] And your brain will start focusing on stuff that it's lost context for and start putting these pieces back. [01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:13.000] The reason we want you to do that is you're not necessarily an ego professional. [01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:21.000] So you can't look at this from the inside and always recognize all the problems with it. [01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:29.000] So we get a timeline and then a third party like Brad or myself can look at it and say, wait a minute, wait a minute. [01:53:29.000 --> 01:53:33.000] This happened, then that happened. There had to be things in between. [01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:38.000] And then we start filling in these pieces. Now we've got the whole story. [01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:46.000] Once we have the timeline, then we make up a story, a novel if you will. [01:53:46.000 --> 01:53:54.000] This is what happened here and you make up a story that stitches all the pieces logically together. [01:53:54.000 --> 01:54:03.000] Once you have that all done, then you go back and create the timeline. [01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:10.000] You create the timeline because you don't need everything that happens. [01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:19.000] You don't need all of the facts. You only need those facts that lead to your story. [01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:25.000] You lead to the conclusions you want the reader to come to. [01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:36.000] So you end the argument in support. You lay out your whole story and you put in the laws. [01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:45.000] The only thing that's relevant are the laws they broke and the details on how they broke them. [01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:49.000] So you go from one to the other. You go down the line. [01:54:49.000 --> 01:54:56.000] Once you're done, then you go to your statement of facts. A statement of facts is an art form. [01:54:56.000 --> 01:55:06.000] You start laying in facts where a reasonable person of ordinary prudence in reading those facts [01:55:06.000 --> 01:55:12.000] would stitch them together in the way you want them to perceive them. [01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:18.000] Now, I can tell you something is a certain way and you may not believe me, [01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:28.000] but if I deliver you a set of facts heartfully crafted that will get you to stitch these facts together [01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:33.000] and come to the conclusion I want you to come to, [01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:38.000] then when you get to the argument in support and I raise this issue [01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:49.000] and make the claim that you came to when you read the facts, you're going to think I'm pretty smart. [01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:52.000] I'm going to have rapport with you. [01:55:52.000 --> 01:56:01.000] You'll tend to go down reading the argument in support and say, yeah, yeah, that's what I thought. [01:56:01.000 --> 01:56:08.000] It builds a much more receptacle audience. [01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:15.000] So you can only do this. It's best to do this when you're the plaintiff. [01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:20.000] So if you want to go after them, first thing you do is put together a timeline. [01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:24.000] All the things have happened. You have taken these guys on pretty good. [01:56:24.000 --> 01:56:27.000] So you already have lots of documentation. [01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:33.000] First thing you do is get the documentation, get the docket sheet from the clerk. [01:56:33.000 --> 01:56:40.000] The clerks are required to keep a listing of all of the documents that have been filed in any case. [01:56:40.000 --> 01:56:46.000] Get that and lay that as the backbone for your timeline. [01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:50.000] And then go down and read it and look at it and say, okay, what happened before this motion [01:56:50.000 --> 01:56:53.000] and what happened after this motion? [01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:56.000] It allows you to focus in time much better. [01:56:56.000 --> 01:57:04.000] And then once you've filled the whole thing out, give it to somebody else like Brett or myself. [01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:10.000] We don't know anything about what happened and we don't have a dog in your hunt. [01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:14.000] We don't look at it based on how they mistreated you. [01:57:14.000 --> 01:57:17.000] We look at it based on law. [01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:22.000] And every time I look at a timeline, I say, wait, wait, wait, hold on. [01:57:22.000 --> 01:57:27.000] It went from this place to this place. There had to be something going on in between. [01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:32.000] But those were things you didn't know to focus on. [01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:34.000] We know to focus on those things. [01:57:34.000 --> 01:57:40.000] We'll start asking questions about these and fill in the blanks in between. [01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:45.000] The most important tool you can have is the timeline. [01:57:45.000 --> 01:57:50.000] That never goes before the court. That's your private record. [01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:55.000] Everything you do in constructing this suit is based on that timeline. [01:57:55.000 --> 01:58:03.000] So you have a talisman. You have a focus to keep everything in its place. [01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:12.000] You can create very powerful pleadings and get these guys to want to come to the table and make you a deal. [01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:21.000] So you'll go away and leave them alone because for the most part, lawyers simply don't have time to do all that. [01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:28.000] They just put together a bunch of junk and throw it at the courts, especially if you're pro se, [01:58:28.000 --> 01:58:33.000] and expect you to be an ignorant idiot. [01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:41.000] But then when you go back and land on them like a ton of bricks, that is so much fun. [01:58:41.000 --> 01:58:45.000] And when I come back, we don't have any more college, so I've got some time here. [01:58:45.000 --> 01:58:50.000] I would like to talk about how to write legal documents. [01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:06.000] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. [01:59:06.000 --> 01:59:13.000] Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, [01:59:13.000 --> 01:59:18.000] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [01:59:18.000 --> 01:59:22.000] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [01:59:22.000 --> 01:59:28.000] providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:33.000] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:43.000] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [01:59:43.000 --> 01:59:50.000] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. [01:59:50.000 --> 02:00:03.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.