[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.500 --> 00:09.500] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.500 --> 00:11.000] Our liberty depends on it. [00:11.000 --> 00:16.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights. [00:16.500 --> 00:18.500] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.500 --> 00:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.000 --> 00:26.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:26.500 --> 00:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.000 --> 00:34.500] Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. [00:34.500 --> 00:38.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [00:38.000 --> 00:42.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.000 --> 00:45.500] Start over with Startpage. [00:45.500 --> 00:47.500] Spar. It's what fighters do. [00:47.500 --> 00:51.000] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:51.000 --> 00:54.000] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:54.000 --> 00:56.500] Spar with an extra P. [00:56.500 --> 01:03.000] S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion. [01:03.000 --> 01:08.500] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion. [01:08.500 --> 01:10.500] But petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.500 --> 01:14.500] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.500 --> 01:17.500] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, [01:17.500 --> 01:21.000] we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:21.000 --> 01:30.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:30.500 --> 01:34.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:34.500 --> 01:38.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:38.000 --> 01:39.500] Our liberty depends on it. [01:39.500 --> 01:43.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way [01:43.000 --> 01:46.000] to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:46.000 --> 01:48.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:48.000 --> 01:51.500] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:51.500 --> 01:56.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:56.500 --> 01:58.000] So protect your rights. [01:58.000 --> 02:01.500] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.500 --> 02:04.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [02:04.000 --> 02:08.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [02:08.000 --> 02:12.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.000 --> 02:15.500] Start over with StartPage. [02:15.500 --> 02:19.500] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms [02:19.500 --> 02:22.000] around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:22.000 --> 02:26.000] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, [02:26.000 --> 02:30.000] arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:30.000 --> 02:33.500] Get it? Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? [02:33.500 --> 02:37.500] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well [02:37.500 --> 02:38.500] when he said, [02:38.500 --> 02:43.500] The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, [02:43.500 --> 02:47.500] one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, [02:47.500 --> 02:51.000] but which historically has proved to always be possible. [02:51.000 --> 03:17.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:17.000 --> 03:21.000] Well, I received my remedy today. [03:21.000 --> 03:25.000] It came in a box just like the thing. [03:25.000 --> 03:28.000] I accepted it for value right away. [03:28.000 --> 03:32.000] It's not sooner, not later. [03:32.000 --> 03:40.000] We are originators and the pathway seems to get straighter every day. [03:40.000 --> 03:47.000] But I can take anything that belongs to me, it's good or too good to use. [03:47.000 --> 03:54.000] What I was good for began to work for the good. [03:54.000 --> 03:58.000] I know some architects. [03:58.000 --> 04:02.000] I know some engineers. [04:02.000 --> 04:05.000] They've seen the evidence. [04:05.000 --> 04:09.000] They know a certain things quick. [04:09.000 --> 04:12.000] I was a blatant deception. [04:12.000 --> 04:16.000] What is the nature of what you might gain? [04:16.000 --> 04:19.000] I see something headed straight for you. [04:19.000 --> 04:23.000] I think it looks just like a train. [04:23.000 --> 04:25.000] Okay, we are back. [04:25.000 --> 04:33.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio on this Friday, the 18th day of November, 2024. [04:33.000 --> 04:37.000] And we're going to try Chris in Colorado again. [04:37.000 --> 04:39.000] Hello, Chris. [04:39.000 --> 04:40.000] Oops. [04:40.000 --> 04:41.000] There we go. [04:41.000 --> 04:42.000] Hello, Chris. [04:42.000 --> 04:43.000] Are you there? [04:43.000 --> 04:44.000] Hey, Randy. [04:44.000 --> 04:45.000] Got you. [04:45.000 --> 04:47.000] All right. [04:47.000 --> 04:50.000] What do you have for us today? [04:50.000 --> 04:52.000] Did you guys try me earlier tonight? [04:52.000 --> 04:54.000] Yeah, we did. [04:54.000 --> 04:56.000] Oh, I'm sorry. [04:56.000 --> 04:59.000] I tried somebody yesterday and we could hear them snoring. [04:59.000 --> 05:01.000] Who was that, Brett? [05:01.000 --> 05:04.000] Oh, I think it was Ted. [05:04.000 --> 05:06.000] Don't know who that was. [05:06.000 --> 05:07.000] I think it was Ted. [05:07.000 --> 05:09.000] That was embarrassing, right? [05:09.000 --> 05:12.000] Big ear snoring away. [05:12.000 --> 05:14.000] Okay, at least you weren't asleep. [05:14.000 --> 05:16.000] Okay, what do you have for us? [05:16.000 --> 05:18.000] I was trying to de-thaw frozen pipes. [05:18.000 --> 05:21.000] That's why I had a slight emergency. [05:21.000 --> 05:22.000] But I'm back. [05:22.000 --> 05:24.000] Okay, cool. [05:24.000 --> 05:26.000] So this will probably be a short call. [05:26.000 --> 05:31.000] But I learned a new term today because I keep hammering this question, [05:31.000 --> 05:36.000] trying to get to case law and rules and past experience. [05:36.000 --> 05:39.000] And I'm still not getting a great answer from federal attorneys, [05:39.000 --> 05:43.000] which means they know less than us in so many respects. [05:43.000 --> 05:45.000] It's amazing. [05:45.000 --> 05:49.000] Anyway, this phrase is called if not but for. [05:49.000 --> 05:52.000] And apparently, I don't know how often it's used, [05:52.000 --> 05:54.000] but basically if not for the actions of one, [05:54.000 --> 05:59.000] then there would be no necessary need for the actions of the other. [05:59.000 --> 06:03.000] Expofacto. [06:03.000 --> 06:05.000] Expofacto? [06:05.000 --> 06:08.000] Expofacto, yeah. [06:08.000 --> 06:15.000] Or you're saying something that is after the fact. [06:15.000 --> 06:20.000] I think he's talking about exclusivity, [06:20.000 --> 06:26.000] that it's caused only because of this. [06:26.000 --> 06:29.000] But for that, it would not have happened. [06:29.000 --> 06:32.000] There's a Latin term for that. [06:32.000 --> 06:35.000] It's not clicking in my brain. [06:35.000 --> 06:37.000] Okay. [06:37.000 --> 06:39.000] Well, it's the first time I've heard the official term. [06:39.000 --> 06:41.000] Therefore, they know it exists. [06:41.000 --> 06:45.000] I guess they're still sitting behind the bias that we cannot recover [06:45.000 --> 06:49.000] any other damages other than specific damages. [06:49.000 --> 06:51.000] So I've been looking through that. [06:51.000 --> 06:54.000] I had one attorney who was not – it's funny. [06:54.000 --> 06:56.000] I've been at this for almost two years of the case, [06:56.000 --> 06:58.000] a year and a half of the case in court. [06:58.000 --> 07:01.000] And in the first six months, I got these lawyers, you know, [07:01.000 --> 07:02.000] that are supposed to be helping pros say, [07:02.000 --> 07:04.000] oh, you're not going to make it before that far. [07:04.000 --> 07:07.000] Only a couple of them did that, but they've all flipped now. [07:07.000 --> 07:11.000] So because I'm still in court, they're like, oh, you're moving along. [07:11.000 --> 07:12.000] You're still here. [07:12.000 --> 07:13.000] Yeah. [07:13.000 --> 07:16.000] So now they're kind of rooting for me in some ways. [07:16.000 --> 07:20.000] And the one guy who said I couldn't recover many damages is now saying, [07:20.000 --> 07:23.000] yeah, those are all consequential damages. [07:23.000 --> 07:27.000] So I did – I've been trying to figure out, you know, [07:27.000 --> 07:31.000] mathematical things to add up and to – for all my expenses. [07:31.000 --> 07:34.000] I did – I asked in the Telegram channel, [07:34.000 --> 07:37.000] and I think, Brett, you mentioned it, just record everything. [07:37.000 --> 07:43.000] So a lot of my things got stolen when my storage locker got cleaned out. [07:43.000 --> 07:44.000] I had a box full of stuff. [07:44.000 --> 07:47.000] But I can still get some of it back, like a lot of hotel receipts. [07:47.000 --> 07:50.000] So I'm going to argue that my travel expenses, [07:50.000 --> 07:55.000] because there's a deduction for the IRS per mile. [07:55.000 --> 07:58.000] I just don't know what's reasonable there. [07:58.000 --> 07:59.000] There's a couple different things. [07:59.000 --> 08:00.000] There's business. [08:00.000 --> 08:01.000] You can go 60 cents. [08:01.000 --> 08:04.000] It used to be about 50 cents in 2018. [08:04.000 --> 08:11.000] And then there's like a standard deduction for travel, which is 22 cents per mile. [08:11.000 --> 08:13.000] I'm just nervous about this. [08:13.000 --> 08:16.000] I'm nervous about sitting down in front of a magistrate judge, [08:16.000 --> 08:20.000] and then they get all – you know, they get – [08:20.000 --> 08:32.000] Send me an email on the IRS issue, and I'll send it to David Lewis. [08:32.000 --> 08:33.000] Well, no, it's not an IRS issue. [08:33.000 --> 08:35.000] I'm just using it as an example. [08:35.000 --> 08:38.000] So I got defrauded, and my vehicle gets damaged, [08:38.000 --> 08:42.000] and it's an illegal issue over in Chicago, right? [08:42.000 --> 08:46.000] If I didn't have that matter, I wouldn't have had to travel to Chicago, [08:46.000 --> 08:50.000] you know, like six or seven times in order to document the illegal behavior [08:50.000 --> 08:53.000] in order to get remedy through the city. [08:53.000 --> 08:58.000] And so if I hadn't have done that work myself, the city wouldn't have done it. [08:58.000 --> 09:01.000] The police refused to do it, so I had to do it. [09:01.000 --> 09:04.000] So those are legitimate consequential damages, [09:04.000 --> 09:08.000] but I keep getting a 50-50 on being able to use those. [09:08.000 --> 09:10.000] And in federal court, they're kind of sticklers. [09:10.000 --> 09:12.000] They're either going to say yes or no, and then they're going to say, [09:12.000 --> 09:14.000] sorry, we don't have jurisdiction because you're now – [09:14.000 --> 09:19.000] you're no longer above $75,000 to be in our courts. [09:19.000 --> 09:22.000] But they haven't said that yet, so that's where I'm just trying to – [09:22.000 --> 09:25.000] I'm trying to find some more stuff to say, okay, yeah, you can – [09:25.000 --> 09:26.000] Wait a minute. Wait a minute. [09:26.000 --> 09:37.000] Do you have to be above $75,000 and something like diversity of jurisdiction? [09:37.000 --> 09:41.000] I thought diversity of jurisdiction was enough to get you in there. [09:41.000 --> 09:43.000] No, it's both. [09:43.000 --> 09:51.000] So diversity means citizen of another state, but also above $75,000. [09:51.000 --> 09:54.000] Okay, I've never filed one that low. [09:54.000 --> 09:57.000] That's why that was a question I'd never addressed. [09:57.000 --> 09:58.000] Okay. [09:58.000 --> 10:04.000] So you should have asked for twice as much and let them argue it down. [10:04.000 --> 10:10.000] I've implied it in my complaint, but well over $200,000 because, you know, [10:10.000 --> 10:13.000] punitive – I found some court cases where punitive is about – [10:13.000 --> 10:16.000] they say it's like a digit – one zero up. [10:16.000 --> 10:18.000] So if you have $10,000, you can ask for $100,000. [10:18.000 --> 10:20.000] If you have $200,000, you can ask for $200,000. [10:20.000 --> 10:23.000] If you can stretch it a little more, you can probably get a little bit more. [10:23.000 --> 10:27.000] But a 10 is – like a number of 10 to 1 is a very comfortable area. [10:27.000 --> 10:33.000] But I've seen 25 and 30 to 1, but there's been some reversals on some of that, [10:33.000 --> 10:35.000] and I've brought it down a bit. [10:35.000 --> 10:40.000] So now that I've proven that, you know, we have a legitimate claim, [10:40.000 --> 10:42.000] now I really have to prove the damages. [10:42.000 --> 10:44.000] And so I'm getting a little nervous because I'm in federal court. [10:44.000 --> 10:46.000] I thought that it's worked to my advantage. [10:46.000 --> 10:47.000] We're in state court. [10:47.000 --> 10:48.000] You can play nasty. [10:48.000 --> 10:51.000] You can do a lot of weird things because they're doing it themselves. [10:51.000 --> 10:55.000] I almost want to be back in – I almost want to be in state court now. [10:55.000 --> 11:00.000] But anyway, I'm just trying to justify those expenses again, [11:00.000 --> 11:02.000] and I'm just having a hard time. [11:02.000 --> 11:04.000] There's a dictionary channel. [11:04.000 --> 11:08.000] I get back and forth. [11:08.000 --> 11:17.000] So any insight on how to present my expenses that resulted from having to come back [11:17.000 --> 11:20.000] and do my own investigative work and do my own proving of the crime [11:20.000 --> 11:23.000] and documenting the crime. [11:23.000 --> 11:28.000] Those are actual costs, and you have receipts and such? [11:28.000 --> 11:29.000] I can get them. [11:29.000 --> 11:34.000] I lost them all in that fast, but I can get them again. [11:34.000 --> 11:37.000] Well, if you've got the receipts, it will be hard for them to get past it. [11:37.000 --> 11:42.000] Those are actual costs. [11:42.000 --> 11:44.000] Okay. [11:44.000 --> 11:45.000] I agree. [11:45.000 --> 11:49.000] I agree. [11:49.000 --> 11:53.000] And then we're going to be sitting at the poker table here probably in the next couple months. [11:53.000 --> 11:57.000] They really want us to sit down for a settlement conference. [11:57.000 --> 12:02.000] And I think we're allowed a petition to get an attorney for our time just for that. [12:02.000 --> 12:05.000] I think the federal court is a lot one. [12:05.000 --> 12:10.000] And at that table, you know, that's the other thing. [12:10.000 --> 12:20.000] I have to present a reasonable compromise to my initial claim amount, my initial complaint amount. [12:20.000 --> 12:23.000] Have you asked for a punitive? [12:23.000 --> 12:25.000] I have, yes. [12:25.000 --> 12:29.000] Okay, then you can – you have your actual costs. [12:29.000 --> 12:31.000] You never go below that. [12:31.000 --> 12:36.000] But you can haggle on the punitive. [12:36.000 --> 12:41.000] They're going to lowball you on their initial offer. [12:41.000 --> 12:49.000] And my standard response is this is not a point from which I will begin to negotiate. [12:49.000 --> 12:52.000] Okay. [12:52.000 --> 12:55.000] But this is just haggling back and forth. [12:55.000 --> 12:56.000] They're going to lowball you. [12:56.000 --> 12:58.000] You're going to highball them. [12:58.000 --> 13:05.000] And then you've got to figure what the judge will consider reasonable. [13:05.000 --> 13:13.000] Well, the magistrate has strictly allotted authority over settlement issues and settlement conferences. [13:13.000 --> 13:16.000] And she's the one who's going to be playing with us for a while. [13:16.000 --> 13:23.000] The main judge is just – he's not really participating except just to rule on amended complaints and motions and things like that. [13:23.000 --> 13:28.000] So they threw us right into the magistrate because they clearly want it settled. [13:28.000 --> 13:30.000] But I don't have to settle. [13:30.000 --> 13:32.000] I do not have to settle. [13:32.000 --> 13:35.000] I can take it all the way to trial. [13:35.000 --> 13:38.000] But it's going to be – I want the experience too. [13:38.000 --> 13:39.000] I want to sit down. [13:39.000 --> 13:42.000] And have you ever done a settlement conference? [13:42.000 --> 13:43.000] No. [13:43.000 --> 13:46.000] Okay. [13:46.000 --> 13:51.000] I want to pull one of these cards out and just say, look, how much does it already cost you? [13:51.000 --> 13:54.000] And how much will it cost you if we go to trial? [13:54.000 --> 13:58.000] And let them know that I'm aware of that. [13:58.000 --> 13:59.000] Good. [13:59.000 --> 14:03.000] Well, I have a case now that I'm setting it up just for that purpose. [14:03.000 --> 14:18.000] This is Victoria County. I'm doing everything to get them to come to the table and make me an offer I can't refuse. [14:18.000 --> 14:20.000] They'll offer me nothing. [14:20.000 --> 14:26.000] I'll ask for the moon and we'll see what happens. [14:26.000 --> 14:29.000] Let them kick it around and see where we can come to. [14:29.000 --> 14:37.000] And then every time they do something I don't like I'll bargrieve them again. [14:37.000 --> 14:43.000] Just so they remember that they want this to be over. [14:43.000 --> 14:45.000] Yeah, I got to start bargrieving more. [14:45.000 --> 14:47.000] I keep forgetting. [14:47.000 --> 14:50.000] The first one I did was so much fun. [14:50.000 --> 14:56.000] I bargrieved the son for what the father did. [14:56.000 --> 14:58.000] In the law firm? [14:58.000 --> 15:00.000] I looked up Cullen. [15:00.000 --> 15:03.000] I knew the name Cullen, so I looked up Cullen Law Firm. [15:03.000 --> 15:10.000] And there were three Cullens, Mama Cullen, Papa Cullen, and Baby Cullen. [15:10.000 --> 15:19.000] So I knew Papa Cullen was too smart to do something this stupid, so I bargrieved Baby Cullen. [15:19.000 --> 15:24.000] I doubted he was happy. [15:24.000 --> 15:29.000] But that may be a way to help. Have you bargrieved the lawyers? [15:29.000 --> 15:31.000] Not all of them, no. [15:31.000 --> 15:33.000] I've been trying to pick. [15:33.000 --> 15:37.000] They're all messing up so bad I've been trying to figure out how to hit them in the right sequence. [15:37.000 --> 15:42.000] I had the attorney, so when I missed that brief status hearing, [15:42.000 --> 15:46.000] the attorney gets on an email immediately to remind me how incompetent I was. [15:46.000 --> 15:50.000] But after I corrected it, he got back on another email and he says, [15:50.000 --> 15:55.000] be sure to CC me every single time or it will be improper. [15:55.000 --> 15:57.000] Well, duh, I know that. [15:57.000 --> 16:07.000] So I'm going to bargrieve him for what is it, unsolicited legal advice? [16:07.000 --> 16:08.000] I didn't ask for that. [16:08.000 --> 16:11.000] And he knows I know that, so why would he be such a snoot about it, right? [16:11.000 --> 16:17.000] So very improper. [16:17.000 --> 16:20.000] Okay, so actual costs, that's the terminology. [16:20.000 --> 16:22.000] That's the argument I can probably use in front of the judge. [16:22.000 --> 16:24.000] These are actual costs, Your Honor. [16:24.000 --> 16:27.000] I would not, if it would not be for what they did, [16:27.000 --> 16:31.000] I would not have to incur these costs in order to remedy this situation. [16:31.000 --> 16:35.000] And it also costs you your time. Your time is valuable. [16:35.000 --> 16:38.000] It is, yeah. [16:38.000 --> 16:42.000] Very, very valuable. [16:42.000 --> 16:43.000] Okay. [16:43.000 --> 16:44.000] All right. [16:44.000 --> 16:47.000] Hang on, about to go to our sponsors. [16:47.000 --> 16:50.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. [16:50.000 --> 16:53.000] Let's see, we've got four on the board, [16:53.000 --> 16:59.000] so I won't give out the call-in number until we get rid of Chris here. [16:59.000 --> 17:00.000] Casey. [17:00.000 --> 17:05.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses? [17:05.000 --> 17:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [17:09.000 --> 17:13.000] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, [17:13.000 --> 17:15.000] and now you can win two. [17:15.000 --> 17:19.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court [17:19.000 --> 17:21.000] using federal civil rights statutes, [17:21.000 --> 17:25.000] what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, [17:25.000 --> 17:27.000] how to answer letters and phone calls, [17:27.000 --> 17:29.000] how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, [17:29.000 --> 17:34.000] how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [17:34.000 --> 17:39.000] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [17:39.000 --> 17:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [17:41.000 --> 17:44.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com [17:44.000 --> 17:49.000] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [17:49.000 --> 17:57.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com [17:57.000 --> 18:01.000] to learn how to stop debt collectors next. [18:01.000 --> 18:05.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [18:05.000 --> 18:07.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, [18:07.000 --> 18:09.000] and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, [18:09.000 --> 18:12.000] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [18:12.000 --> 18:15.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [18:15.000 --> 18:17.000] the right to act in our own private capacity, [18:17.000 --> 18:19.000] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [18:19.000 --> 18:22.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity [18:22.000 --> 18:25.000] to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [18:25.000 --> 18:28.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [18:28.000 --> 18:31.000] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [18:31.000 --> 18:33.000] that will help you understand what due process is [18:33.000 --> 18:35.000] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [18:35.000 --> 18:37.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material [18:37.000 --> 18:40.000] by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [18:40.000 --> 18:42.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, [18:42.000 --> 18:45.000] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [18:45.000 --> 18:47.000] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [18:47.000 --> 18:50.000] hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [18:50.000 --> 18:54.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [18:54.000 --> 19:11.000] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [19:11.000 --> 19:38.000] Okay, we are back. [19:38.000 --> 19:44.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Chris in Colorado. [19:44.000 --> 19:48.000] Okay, where were we, Chris? [19:48.000 --> 19:49.000] That was it. [19:49.000 --> 19:54.000] I was just kind of rubbing some verbal terminology on you guys [19:54.000 --> 20:00.000] to make sure I could be a little more confident in my discussion with the judge. [20:00.000 --> 20:02.000] Okay, I'm having a little trouble today. [20:02.000 --> 20:05.000] I had a cold or something land on me, [20:05.000 --> 20:12.000] but I'm struggling a little here to even be able to think. [20:12.000 --> 20:16.000] Okay, so you're done, Chris? [20:16.000 --> 20:17.000] Yeah, I think we're good. [20:17.000 --> 20:18.000] Thanks, guys. [20:18.000 --> 20:19.000] Thank you again. [20:19.000 --> 20:20.000] Okay, thank you, Chris. [20:20.000 --> 20:27.000] Now we're going to go into Ms. Sweet Tina. [20:27.000 --> 20:29.000] Hello, Sweet Tina. [20:29.000 --> 20:33.000] You noticed I didn't say anything about being chervish, [20:33.000 --> 20:36.000] and I would never mention such a thing. [20:36.000 --> 20:37.000] Oh, really? [20:37.000 --> 20:38.000] I'm sure you wouldn't. [20:38.000 --> 20:39.000] By the way... [20:39.000 --> 20:48.000] Oh, I would never say chervish in the same sentence with Tina, never. [20:48.000 --> 20:54.000] Mr. Randy, you lie like a cheap Chinese watch. [20:54.000 --> 20:57.000] Okay, what do you have for us to... [20:57.000 --> 21:00.000] Oh, have you used that tool? [21:00.000 --> 21:03.000] Yes, I have been using that tool. [21:03.000 --> 21:07.000] It's a little difficult to get used to, but I am trying to use it. [21:07.000 --> 21:08.000] Good. [21:08.000 --> 21:13.000] I'm working on it once a day because twice a day is a little hard. [21:13.000 --> 21:17.000] Well, if it's hurting you much, you're pressing too hard. [21:17.000 --> 21:19.000] Okay, well, I'll keep working on it. [21:19.000 --> 21:22.000] Just till it irritates a little, not till it hurts a lot. [21:22.000 --> 21:28.000] I sent Tina one of these chiropractic tools I built. [21:28.000 --> 21:36.000] It's a tool designed to inflict copious amounts of pain on yourself with. [21:36.000 --> 21:37.000] And it does. [21:37.000 --> 21:38.000] It's true. [21:38.000 --> 21:43.000] It does inflict copious amounts of pain. [21:43.000 --> 21:44.000] Okay, what do you... [21:44.000 --> 21:47.000] It's written in your writing that you promised. [21:47.000 --> 21:50.000] So remember to send me that so I can read it. [21:50.000 --> 21:55.000] But then we'll go on to what I wanted to ask about. [21:55.000 --> 21:58.000] First of all, that guy, Greg, that was on earlier from California, [21:58.000 --> 22:05.000] if he wants to go against the medical establishment for all that ridiculous stuff on COVID, I will join him. [22:05.000 --> 22:08.000] So let him know. [22:08.000 --> 22:09.000] Good. [22:09.000 --> 22:10.000] It's crazy. [22:10.000 --> 22:19.000] I will be a part of any kind of lawsuit he wants to present against us, stupid medical establishment. [22:19.000 --> 22:24.000] Okay, before you get into your issues, I have a question about politics. [22:24.000 --> 22:25.000] Oh, yeah. [22:25.000 --> 22:37.000] What do you expect the effect of this move toward the red that California has experienced? [22:37.000 --> 22:40.000] First, can you explain what actually happened? [22:40.000 --> 22:46.000] I haven't heard the details of the election in California. [22:46.000 --> 22:54.000] Well, I don't know. It's an anomaly because we've been blue for so damn long. [22:54.000 --> 23:03.000] I just, I can't understand it, but I'm hoping it lasts and I'm hoping it spreads rapidly [23:03.000 --> 23:10.000] because we need to get back to the truth, the rule of law. [23:10.000 --> 23:20.000] We need to get away from, I think people are sick to death of the problems in San Francisco, [23:20.000 --> 23:25.000] the homelessness, the filth on the streets, the crime. [23:25.000 --> 23:29.000] You know, all I hear from people is they're sick to death of that. [23:29.000 --> 23:36.000] And I know personally people who are moving out of state because of those problems, [23:36.000 --> 23:41.000] the crime, the filth and the politics. [23:41.000 --> 23:48.000] It's unbelievable how many people I've talked to who are absolutely moving to Florida and Texas. [23:48.000 --> 23:49.000] Texas. [23:49.000 --> 23:50.000] Where are they going? [23:50.000 --> 23:59.000] Somebody proposed we put a sign out on Highway 10 near New Mexico that welcomes Californians to Texas [23:59.000 --> 24:05.000] and asks that they keep going until they go out the other side. [24:05.000 --> 24:09.000] Well, just don't bring the California Democratic policies to Texas. [24:09.000 --> 24:11.000] That's what you've got to tell them. [24:11.000 --> 24:14.000] You're welcome if you don't bring that here. [24:14.000 --> 24:17.000] Yeah, don't vote what you just fled. [24:17.000 --> 24:22.000] Yeah, don't do to Texas what you did to California. [24:22.000 --> 24:26.000] So what do you think the move to the right is going to do? [24:26.000 --> 24:31.000] Do you expect much change because of that? [24:31.000 --> 24:33.000] Not right away, I don't know. [24:33.000 --> 24:35.000] I think it's too entrenched here. [24:35.000 --> 24:38.000] I think it's going to be a very difficult move. [24:38.000 --> 24:47.000] I hope I'm surprised, but I don't hold out a lot of hope because we still have Newscum in charge. [24:47.000 --> 24:55.000] And he's aligned with Pelosi and all the rest of the, you know, the words I can't say on here. [24:55.000 --> 25:02.000] So unless we get rid of Newscum, I don't think we're going to go far. [25:02.000 --> 25:04.000] Well, that's depressing. [25:04.000 --> 25:09.000] I was hoping you was going to say, yeah, everything's going to change overnight. [25:09.000 --> 25:15.000] Well, I wish, but I can hope and dream. [25:15.000 --> 25:18.000] Anyway, I wanted to ask you a quick question. [25:18.000 --> 25:25.000] I've been posted a little bit on the Telegram site about the judges and their oath of office [25:25.000 --> 25:30.000] and the requirements, and I wanted to get your input on it [25:30.000 --> 25:38.000] because, you know, all public officials, including judges, have to take an oath of office [25:38.000 --> 25:44.000] before they enter and can, you know, do their duties of the office. [25:44.000 --> 25:46.000] Okay? [25:46.000 --> 25:56.000] So why is it that some of these judges do not have oaths of office on file [25:56.000 --> 26:02.000] with the Secretary of State's office, and they are required to have those? [26:02.000 --> 26:08.000] And does it make their rulings invalid or should it make their rulings invalid [26:08.000 --> 26:16.000] if they do not have a valid up-to-date oath of office? [26:16.000 --> 26:24.000] That would probably require a petition in core warrant. [26:24.000 --> 26:27.000] What is the petition in core warrant? [26:27.000 --> 26:34.000] Core warrant is a method for removing someone from office for bad behavior. [26:34.000 --> 26:42.000] You can maintain that the officer never properly occupied the office [26:42.000 --> 26:49.000] as they failed to meet the requirements and petition that they be removed core warrant, [26:49.000 --> 26:58.000] getting all of their rulings overturned would probably be next to impossible [26:58.000 --> 27:03.000] unless you could show that all their rulings were horribly improper [27:03.000 --> 27:11.000] because in doing that, you would work a horrendous harm to all of those people [27:11.000 --> 27:17.000] who went through the court system to seek remedy. [27:17.000 --> 27:21.000] It would nullify all of that. [27:21.000 --> 27:26.000] Well, as it should be, if they're being paid to be a judge, [27:26.000 --> 27:30.000] then they're too damn lazy to do what they're supposed to do. [27:30.000 --> 27:37.000] It says here in the 1363, each judge of a superior court, the county clerk, [27:37.000 --> 27:41.000] the executive officer or court administrator of the superior court, [27:41.000 --> 27:45.000] and the recorder shall file a copy of his or her official oath [27:45.000 --> 27:51.000] signed with his or her own proper signature in the office of the secretary of state [27:51.000 --> 27:58.000] as soon as he or she has taken and subscribed his or her own. [27:58.000 --> 28:10.000] Has anyone filed charges against the judge for impersonating a public official? [28:10.000 --> 28:17.000] I have not, but I have found that two of the judges that ruled in some of my prior cases [28:17.000 --> 28:20.000] did not have, well, actually more than two, [28:20.000 --> 28:27.000] they do not have an oath of office on record with the secretary of state. [28:27.000 --> 28:32.000] I have a letter from the secretary of state stating that, you know, [28:32.000 --> 28:40.000] after due diligence and much research, they cannot find oath of office for this list of judges. [28:40.000 --> 28:45.000] And I have two of them that they give me their oath of office, [28:45.000 --> 28:50.000] but there's a date on there that's an expiration date. [28:50.000 --> 28:55.000] And it's before, the expiration date is before they ruled on my matter. [28:55.000 --> 29:01.000] Why should they be allowed to rule if they don't follow the law? [29:01.000 --> 29:04.000] Because no one's challenged it. [29:04.000 --> 29:07.000] Well, I want to because I'm tired of it. [29:07.000 --> 29:08.000] Good. [29:08.000 --> 29:12.000] But I don't know how to challenge it because I don't want to accept their rulings [29:12.000 --> 29:19.000] if one of them did not even sign his order. [29:19.000 --> 29:24.000] That's a federal judge that did not sign his order. [29:24.000 --> 29:27.000] Oh, wait, these are federal judges? [29:27.000 --> 29:35.000] You might consider filing a complaint against them with the attorney general in D.C. [29:35.000 --> 29:36.000] Okay. [29:36.000 --> 29:39.000] We'll speak to that when we come back on the other side. [29:39.000 --> 29:44.000] This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. [29:44.000 --> 29:47.000] Let's see, the call board's full. [29:47.000 --> 29:49.000] Looks like we have a first-time caller. [29:49.000 --> 29:51.000] So hang on. [29:51.000 --> 29:53.000] We're going to our sponsors. [29:53.000 --> 30:00.000] We'll be right back. [30:00.000 --> 30:23.000] Everyone knows that walking is a great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk could predict how long you're going to live. [30:23.000 --> 30:48.000] New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live. [30:48.000 --> 30:56.000] The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter per second or faster live longer than expected. [30:56.000 --> 31:00.000] In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour. [31:00.000 --> 31:07.000] A senior's age, gender, and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures. [31:07.000 --> 31:10.000] Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer. [31:10.000 --> 31:13.000] Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive. [31:13.000 --> 31:16.000] It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk, and a few minutes. [31:16.000 --> 31:21.000] Researchers say it could help doctors identify older patients who need special care. [31:21.000 --> 31:30.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:30.000 --> 31:35.000] I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001. [31:35.000 --> 31:38.000] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11. [31:38.000 --> 31:42.000] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. [31:42.000 --> 31:46.000] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, [31:46.000 --> 31:52.000] over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story. [31:52.000 --> 31:55.000] Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. [31:55.000 --> 32:01.000] Go to buildingwhat.org, why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [32:01.000 --> 32:06.000] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word? [32:06.000 --> 32:13.000] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk, [32:13.000 --> 32:18.000] where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [32:18.000 --> 32:25.000] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. [32:25.000 --> 32:29.000] Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, [32:29.000 --> 32:33.000] where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [32:33.000 --> 32:40.000] The second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development. [32:40.000 --> 32:44.000] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [32:44.000 --> 32:51.000] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [32:51.000 --> 32:57.000] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. [32:57.000 --> 33:01.000] to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [33:01.000 --> 33:11.000] Live free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com [33:31.000 --> 33:48.000] Okay, we are back. [33:48.000 --> 33:54.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio, and we're talking to Tina in California. [33:54.000 --> 33:57.000] Okay, Tina, Oath of Office. [33:57.000 --> 34:02.000] We've heard on the show, we've heard a lot of people go into Oath of Office. [34:02.000 --> 34:06.000] And normally, that's not an issue I would care a whole lot about, [34:06.000 --> 34:14.000] but if you've got bad judges rendering bad rulings, it's certainly be a good thing to go after them for. [34:14.000 --> 34:18.000] Well, you know, I've got one here that the Phillips is here. [34:18.000 --> 34:24.000] His oath that was filed in 2007, [34:24.000 --> 34:31.000] it says for the term ending January the 7th, 2013, this is the one who didn't sign his orders. [34:31.000 --> 34:36.000] Wait a minute, they expect us to follow the rules, but they don't have to? [34:36.000 --> 34:38.000] You know, that to me is wrong. [34:38.000 --> 34:41.000] Yeah, not even the rules to be a judge. [34:41.000 --> 34:44.000] Yes, I hold them to a higher standard. [34:44.000 --> 34:48.000] If they can't follow the rules, why are they saying we should? [34:48.000 --> 34:56.000] Goes to my favorite quote, H.G. Wells wrote an outline of history. [34:56.000 --> 35:02.000] And in book one on speaking to the corruption of the popes during the Dark Ages, [35:02.000 --> 35:09.000] he very aptly observed that the giver of the law most owes the law allegiance. [35:09.000 --> 35:14.000] He of all beings should behave as though the law compels him, [35:14.000 --> 35:21.000] but it is the universal failing of mankind that what we are given to administer, [35:21.000 --> 35:26.000] we promptly presume we own. [35:26.000 --> 35:30.000] And that's exactly what's happening. [35:30.000 --> 35:34.000] But is it criminal or how do you address it? [35:34.000 --> 35:40.000] Because apart from the letter that you got from the Secretary of State, let me read this paragraph to you. [35:40.000 --> 35:48.000] I already read 1363A, which says they're required to file, you know, timely after they take the oath. [35:48.000 --> 35:57.000] So this letter, after the long list of judges that they cannot find the oath of office on file where they're supposed to file it, [35:57.000 --> 36:01.000] it says failure to locate an oath of office for an individual [36:01.000 --> 36:09.000] does not indicate that the individual is required to file an oath of office pursuant to government code section 1363. [36:09.000 --> 36:12.000] Didn't I just read that and it says they are? [36:12.000 --> 36:17.000] Or that the individual is in violation of the law for failure to file. [36:17.000 --> 36:20.000] Okay. Okay. Hold on. [36:20.000 --> 36:29.000] Are there any judges in any circumstances that are not required to have an oath of office on record? [36:29.000 --> 36:31.000] Not that I found. [36:31.000 --> 36:38.000] Every public official and every judge is required to take an oath of office to perform their duty. [36:38.000 --> 36:40.000] Okay. Where did you read this from? [36:40.000 --> 36:45.000] Where it said just because they didn't have an oath didn't mean they couldn't take the office. [36:45.000 --> 36:53.000] This is the letter that I got from the Secretary of State when I requested the office of the oath of office [36:53.000 --> 36:58.000] for all the judges in my case, both appeal judges, federal judges, state judges, [36:58.000 --> 37:05.000] and most all of them did not have an oath of office that could be located with the Secretary of State. [37:05.000 --> 37:12.000] And the Secretary of State told you this and you believed the Secretary of State? [37:12.000 --> 37:15.000] Well, no, I don't believe that. [37:15.000 --> 37:23.000] They're contradicting 1363 when they say there is no statutory or regulatory authority prescribing the filing process [37:23.000 --> 37:26.000] or penalties for failure to file an oath of office. [37:26.000 --> 37:34.000] Now, I haven't seen the penalties, but with the Secretary of State pursuant to government code section 1363. [37:34.000 --> 37:41.000] Therefore, the Secretary of State does not issue certificates of no record for oath of office. [37:41.000 --> 37:50.000] Why? 1363 clearly states that they are supposed to be filing that. [37:50.000 --> 37:57.000] So if the Secretary of State does not do this and does not follow through, why not? [37:57.000 --> 38:01.000] Well, it's just saying they're not going to certify to you, is that right? [38:01.000 --> 38:06.000] If they don't have it, they won't certify to you that it doesn't exist. [38:06.000 --> 38:08.000] Am I hearing that right? [38:08.000 --> 38:14.000] They cannot find it on file. [38:14.000 --> 38:22.000] You might consider charging the Secretary of State with temporary government document. [38:22.000 --> 38:27.000] If we presume that the judge does have a properly filed oath, [38:27.000 --> 38:34.000] then it is the duty of the Secretary of State, if that's the one they're filed with, to maintain those records. [38:34.000 --> 38:40.000] And if they fail to do so, if the records were put somewhere where they were not accessible, [38:40.000 --> 38:45.000] that's tampering with the government document. [38:45.000 --> 38:47.000] Well, that's what I'm seeing. [38:47.000 --> 38:52.000] And there's a few judges, there's only I think two of these judges, one, my most recent one, [38:52.000 --> 38:59.000] that has an oath of office on file that is valid for the time. [38:59.000 --> 39:06.000] I mean, one that was out of date is 2015 and one as 2030. [39:06.000 --> 39:12.000] And this is the one judge didn't ever sign his orders and his oath of office is out of date, [39:12.000 --> 39:17.000] according to the oath of office on file with the Secretary of State. [39:17.000 --> 39:22.000] They can't be that lazy to not do what they're supposed to do, [39:22.000 --> 39:25.000] or are they just going to say, well, I'm a judge, I don't care, [39:25.000 --> 39:30.000] and you shouldn't care because no matter what, I can tell you what to do. [39:30.000 --> 39:33.000] Well, filed against them. [39:33.000 --> 39:38.000] You may, you know, this is the kind of thing you take to the Fed. [39:38.000 --> 39:46.000] If the state refuses to rule properly, you appeal it up to the Fed. [39:46.000 --> 39:52.000] So I'm coming up to this appeal and I've got three of the judges here [39:52.000 --> 39:57.000] that the state can't find the oath of office for. [39:57.000 --> 40:02.000] And these are the same ones that threatened to sanction me if I kept litigating. [40:02.000 --> 40:05.000] How do I approach that? [40:05.000 --> 40:10.000] Do I file just a professional conduct complaint with the state? [40:10.000 --> 40:12.000] How do, what do I do? [40:12.000 --> 40:16.000] No, this is not, this doesn't strike me as professional conduct. [40:16.000 --> 40:20.000] It strikes me more as criminal. [40:20.000 --> 40:23.000] But how do, what criminal is it? [40:23.000 --> 40:26.000] Impersonating a public official. [40:26.000 --> 40:28.000] Okay. [40:28.000 --> 40:32.000] He never properly took the office, therefore he abandoned the office. [40:32.000 --> 40:35.000] And then he's holding himself out as a public official [40:35.000 --> 40:42.000] when he's not, hasn't properly taken the office. [40:42.000 --> 40:46.000] That sounds like it would work. [40:46.000 --> 40:49.000] It should get their attention. [40:49.000 --> 40:51.000] And where do you file that? [40:51.000 --> 40:57.000] Do you say they are filing it with state or the Fed? [40:57.000 --> 41:02.000] So where do I send that complaint, that criminal complaint? [41:02.000 --> 41:05.000] Well, after dealing with California, [41:05.000 --> 41:09.000] and as much as you've dealt with the judges in California, [41:09.000 --> 41:15.000] you might look at taking that to the state as a RICO. [41:15.000 --> 41:19.000] You have all these judges rendering bogus rulings, [41:19.000 --> 41:22.000] and none of them are proper judges. [41:22.000 --> 41:30.000] And they're denying you and others similarly situated in the due course of the laws. [41:30.000 --> 41:32.000] Yeah. [41:32.000 --> 41:35.000] Because they're required to... [41:35.000 --> 41:39.000] And file it in D.C. [41:39.000 --> 41:41.000] File in D.C. [41:41.000 --> 41:45.000] You can do it by email in D.C., by e-file. [41:45.000 --> 41:55.000] And file with the, what is it, the third court, Article III court in D.C. [41:55.000 --> 41:58.000] Article III court, okay. [41:58.000 --> 42:01.000] Yeah, because I really want to hold them accountable. [42:01.000 --> 42:03.000] You know, they hold us accountable. [42:03.000 --> 42:05.000] Why can't we hold them accountable? [42:05.000 --> 42:07.000] Exactly. [42:07.000 --> 42:11.000] You know, if you're too lazy to sign your orders, then the orders shouldn't be valid. [42:11.000 --> 42:19.000] If you're too lazy to file and ensure that your oath of office is filed as required with the Secretary of State, [42:19.000 --> 42:24.000] then you shouldn't be a judge. [42:24.000 --> 42:26.000] Sounds reasonable. [42:26.000 --> 42:33.000] And we've had a lot of people complain about it, but as far as I know, nobody's actually taking it on. [42:33.000 --> 42:34.000] Well... [42:34.000 --> 42:38.000] Or if they have, they never told us about it. [42:38.000 --> 42:44.000] You know, it may seem petty to some and a minor thing, but I don't think it should be a minor. [42:44.000 --> 42:46.000] They're required to know the law. [42:46.000 --> 42:49.000] They're required to keep up to date with the law. [42:49.000 --> 42:56.000] They're required to do certain things to have the privilege of practicing law and being a judge, [42:56.000 --> 43:00.000] just like the attorneys are required to take an oath, [43:00.000 --> 43:05.000] and they're required to uphold the Constitution and the laws of the state, [43:05.000 --> 43:09.000] and they're required to not to tell the truth. [43:09.000 --> 43:13.000] Well, they don't, and nobody holds them accountable. [43:13.000 --> 43:17.000] Okay, Tina, you're up. [43:17.000 --> 43:25.000] You have enough egregious behavior by judges to show a pattern of mistreatment [43:25.000 --> 43:33.000] by judges who don't have a proper oath of office and no standing to hold the office at all. [43:33.000 --> 43:38.000] Yes, I like that. No standing to hold the office if they have me filed. [43:38.000 --> 43:43.000] And this is something you might get the feds to pick up. [43:43.000 --> 43:46.000] Okay, well, I can try. [43:46.000 --> 43:49.000] Okay, do you have something for us on the other side? [43:49.000 --> 43:52.000] At noon, I'll let you go to assemble the floor on the other side. [43:52.000 --> 43:55.000] Okay, thank you. [43:55.000 --> 44:00.000] This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain. We'll be right back. [44:00.000 --> 44:06.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [44:06.000 --> 44:11.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [44:11.000 --> 44:17.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [44:17.000 --> 44:22.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, [44:22.000 --> 44:25.000] young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [44:25.000 --> 44:31.000] Logos Serial Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [44:31.000 --> 44:36.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor [44:36.000 --> 44:40.000] along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [44:40.000 --> 44:43.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, [44:43.000 --> 44:47.000] your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [44:47.000 --> 44:52.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [44:52.000 --> 44:55.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, [44:55.000 --> 44:59.000] help your friends and family, and increase your income. [44:59.000 --> 45:01.000] Order now. [45:01.000 --> 45:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:04.000 --> 45:07.000] Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary. [45:07.000 --> 45:15.000] The affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [45:15.000 --> 45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:23.000 --> 45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [45:28.000 --> 45:34.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [45:34.000 --> 45:39.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [45:39.000 --> 45:43.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:43.000 --> 45:49.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:49.000 --> 45:52.000] pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.000 --> 46:15.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [46:15.000 --> 46:25.000] Thank you. [46:45.000 --> 46:53.000] Okay, we are back. [46:53.000 --> 46:56.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. [46:56.000 --> 47:00.000] And we've got what looks like two new first-time callers. [47:00.000 --> 47:03.000] Going to our first one. [47:03.000 --> 47:08.000] If you are in, what was it, Brett? [47:08.000 --> 47:15.000] San Dusky, Ohio. [47:15.000 --> 47:18.000] Talk to us. [47:18.000 --> 47:19.000] Hello, hello? [47:19.000 --> 47:21.000] Hello, hello. [47:21.000 --> 47:23.000] Give us a first name and a state. [47:23.000 --> 47:28.000] I'm pretty sure we looked at 419, and it's in Ohio? [47:28.000 --> 47:30.000] Correct. [47:30.000 --> 47:31.000] Correct. [47:31.000 --> 47:38.000] First name Lance, I just have a brief question for you just regarding judicial complaints. [47:38.000 --> 47:42.000] Oh, one of our favorite subjects. [47:42.000 --> 47:43.000] Okay. [47:43.000 --> 47:52.000] I have an existing court case, and in one of the hearings, the judge had basically told me, [47:52.000 --> 47:54.000] and I don't remember what he said word for word, [47:54.000 --> 48:04.000] but I was told that he did not want me to send anything into the court to the clerk's office [48:04.000 --> 48:07.000] with any pleadings, filings, et cetera. [48:07.000 --> 48:14.000] Just a tiny bit of background, I had previously fired the attorney that I had hired, [48:14.000 --> 48:17.000] which he didn't seem to like very much, [48:17.000 --> 48:24.000] and I was given what they call a court-appointed counsel, standby counsel, [48:24.000 --> 48:31.000] so basically I'm being told that I have to use this individual that I never did ask for, [48:31.000 --> 48:34.000] like I said, the standby counsel. [48:34.000 --> 48:38.000] Ted, Ted Scarlett, where are you? [48:38.000 --> 48:41.000] Ted Scarlett's the guy you need to talk to. [48:41.000 --> 48:44.000] He's been suing his own counsel for a long time. [48:44.000 --> 48:47.000] The first thing you do is bargain the crap out of both lawyers. [48:47.000 --> 48:53.000] The one you fired, you need to send a tort letter to the one you fired, [48:53.000 --> 49:05.000] notice of intent to sue for lack of ineffective assistance counsel. [49:05.000 --> 49:16.000] And okay, the court appointed this lawyer, this second lawyer, without your request for one? [49:16.000 --> 49:18.000] That is correct. [49:18.000 --> 49:22.000] Oh, have you filed criminally against the judge yet? [49:22.000 --> 49:23.000] No, I haven't. [49:23.000 --> 49:26.000] That's the whole point of asking the question, [49:26.000 --> 49:30.000] because what I was going to say in regards to a judicial complaint, [49:30.000 --> 49:35.000] that's the one remedy that I'm familiar with, at least I've heard of [49:35.000 --> 49:41.000] and I was just going to ask in this situation the effectiveness of that [49:41.000 --> 49:46.000] or even if that's the tool to use. [49:46.000 --> 49:54.000] Before we go any farther, what is the nature of your case? [49:54.000 --> 49:59.000] It's dealing with taxation. [49:59.000 --> 50:01.000] Like IRS or state? [50:01.000 --> 50:03.000] Yes, yes. [50:03.000 --> 50:05.000] No, no, no, that was either or. [50:05.000 --> 50:08.000] IRS or state or both? [50:08.000 --> 50:11.000] I'm sorry, no, it's IRS, I'm sorry. [50:11.000 --> 50:14.000] Oh, okay. [50:14.000 --> 50:18.000] First thing you need to do is talk to David Lewis. [50:18.000 --> 50:24.000] Did the IRS send you a, what do they call it Brad? [50:24.000 --> 50:26.000] Notice of deficiency? [50:26.000 --> 50:30.000] No, no, an assessment? [50:30.000 --> 50:32.000] No. [50:32.000 --> 50:37.000] Send a letter to the IRS and ask them to request an assessment. [50:37.000 --> 50:40.000] See in the code, they're required to give you an assessment. [50:40.000 --> 50:45.000] What they do is they ask you to do your own assessment. [50:45.000 --> 50:49.000] But when you ask them for an assessment, you tend to never hear from them again. [50:49.000 --> 50:55.000] Okay, that, next thing is talk to David Lewis. [50:55.000 --> 51:03.000] He's been doing this show for 15 years and he's the only tax guy I've referenced. [51:03.000 --> 51:06.000] He will show you some tricks. [51:06.000 --> 51:14.000] Is this a state court, federal court or IRS tax court that you're in? [51:14.000 --> 51:16.000] Federal. [51:16.000 --> 51:21.000] Okay, because the IRS tax court is not a court. [51:21.000 --> 51:26.000] They named it court, but it's not a court, it's just administrative hearing. [51:26.000 --> 51:29.000] They want you to think it's a court. [51:29.000 --> 51:33.000] So this is a federal judge. [51:33.000 --> 51:41.000] Okay, there's something we're not getting because I've helped a lot of people file federal actions in court, [51:41.000 --> 51:44.000] I filed my own and they never required me to have an attorney. [51:44.000 --> 51:50.000] Why are they insisting you have an attorney? [51:50.000 --> 51:57.000] That's the question that I don't have an answer for other than to just tell you that one of the hearing [51:57.000 --> 52:05.000] that we did have when this was after I had fired the attorney, [52:05.000 --> 52:09.000] I can just say that the judge for some reason just seemed really upset. [52:09.000 --> 52:16.000] He was telling me basically, that's not your job, that's my job to do something like that. [52:16.000 --> 52:21.000] So again, which I know that that's wrong and everything. [52:21.000 --> 52:28.000] Okay, when the judge starts doing that, they have a pat response, especially to federal judges. [52:28.000 --> 52:38.000] You just tell the judge, if he'll bend over, you'll pull that wild hair out of his behind for him. [52:38.000 --> 52:39.000] No? [52:39.000 --> 52:40.000] Okay. [52:40.000 --> 52:41.000] It was just a thought. [52:41.000 --> 52:47.000] I've never done that to a federal judge, but I'd like to watch somebody else do it. [52:47.000 --> 52:56.000] Okay, maybe not, but something strikes me here. [52:56.000 --> 53:10.000] On this channel, we are on this station, we talk to people who are generally upset or not happy with the legal system. [53:10.000 --> 53:17.000] And they call in to find out how they can protect themselves from bad behavior. [53:17.000 --> 53:25.000] Sometimes, especially in the federal court, what they're complaining about is not always bad behavior. [53:25.000 --> 53:29.000] When you're in the federal court, you need to watch them real carefully. [53:29.000 --> 53:32.000] Do you have any rulings by the judge? [53:32.000 --> 53:35.000] No. [53:35.000 --> 53:50.000] Because generally, the federal judges and generally the federal courts tend to give a lot of deference to proceeds litigants. [53:50.000 --> 53:59.000] So if the judge is trying to force a lawyer on you, why? [53:59.000 --> 54:05.000] Was the first lawyer a lawyer of your choosing? [54:05.000 --> 54:10.000] He was of my choosing, yes. [54:10.000 --> 54:15.000] Why did you fire him? [54:15.000 --> 54:19.000] Okay, let me take a step back and tell you why I'm asking you that. [54:19.000 --> 54:27.000] Most people, you know, they come on the show and they all talk about the judges as if they're all dirty rotten scoundrels. [54:27.000 --> 54:34.000] And I understand that as I've had a dirty rotten scoundrel or two. [54:34.000 --> 54:38.000] Judge Winkle in Austin, if you're listening, you're one of those. [54:38.000 --> 54:43.000] And Judge McBride, if he's still on the bench, he's another one of those. [54:43.000 --> 54:50.000] But for the most part, these higher level judges aren't like traffic court judges. [54:50.000 --> 54:55.000] They tend to be more straightforward and they tend to follow law. [54:55.000 --> 55:03.000] If the judge is ordering you to have an attorney, you might take a step back. [55:03.000 --> 55:08.000] And before you automatically assume that the judge is the bad guy here, [55:08.000 --> 55:21.000] it may be that the judge has concerns about you being able to achieve remedy without an attorney. [55:21.000 --> 55:31.000] What did your counsel do to give you cause to fire him or her? [55:31.000 --> 55:36.000] I mean, it wasn't any one particular incident or another. [55:36.000 --> 55:39.000] It was really just over the course of time. [55:39.000 --> 55:47.000] I mean, basically what was said earlier, ineffective assistance of counsel, I think is how it was said. [55:47.000 --> 55:48.000] Yes. [55:48.000 --> 55:54.000] It really is. I mean, so it just came down to everything from, for example, [55:54.000 --> 56:00.000] I remember asking the attorney to file something for me to the case. [56:00.000 --> 56:07.000] They didn't do it, wouldn't give me an explanation as to why they wouldn't do it. [56:07.000 --> 56:09.000] Okay. Hold on. [56:09.000 --> 56:19.000] Once you hire an attorney, very few attorneys will allow the litigant to file a document in the case [56:19.000 --> 56:23.000] that the attorney then has to adjudicate. [56:23.000 --> 56:24.000] That makes them crazy. [56:24.000 --> 56:26.000] They don't like that. [56:26.000 --> 56:33.000] Yeah. And we have some where I've got some documents that I've given to people [56:33.000 --> 56:37.000] and the lawyers look at them and they don't even understand them. [56:37.000 --> 56:43.000] Generally, a lawyer, if he gets into a case and an issue comes up he's not familiar with, [56:43.000 --> 56:50.000] he will try to find a lawyer who is familiar with it and bring that lawyer in. [56:50.000 --> 56:59.000] If a lawyer misargues something in the court, that can cost him his bar card. [56:59.000 --> 57:08.000] So we pick on judges of all people to talk about this and we're the ones who show people [57:08.000 --> 57:16.000] how to go after judges and prosecutors and lawyers and how to generally beat up public officials. [57:16.000 --> 57:22.000] But it may not always be the best methodology. [57:22.000 --> 57:31.000] How serious is this tax issue to your future? [57:31.000 --> 57:39.000] Well, I mean, certainly enough to call you up and get your take. [57:39.000 --> 57:45.000] Okay. Here, sometimes I get people call in, they ask me for advice. [57:45.000 --> 57:48.000] I can tell you how to beat them up. [57:48.000 --> 57:53.000] Sometimes I can tell you how to beat them up big time. [57:53.000 --> 57:57.000] But we owe it to be careful. [57:57.000 --> 58:00.000] You know, I like the idea of you beating up judges, [58:00.000 --> 58:08.000] but to send you out to beat up a judge that may put you in tax prison, [58:08.000 --> 58:11.000] I'm going to be real careful about that. [58:11.000 --> 58:15.000] I want to be sure that the judge is a bad guy. [58:15.000 --> 58:18.000] He may not be. You may not be understanding. [58:18.000 --> 58:24.000] Every time he renders a ruling in the federal court, they also provide a judgment. [58:24.000 --> 58:29.000] And a judgment is effectively findings of fact and conclusions of law. [58:29.000 --> 58:35.000] They tend to be much more careful than lower courts. [58:35.000 --> 58:40.000] There's another way to say, he'll tell you why he ruled the way he did. [58:40.000 --> 58:44.000] Exactly. And you should pay close attention to that. [58:44.000 --> 58:46.000] Hang on, we'll pick this up on the other side. [58:46.000 --> 58:50.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back. [58:50.000 --> 58:54.000] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? [58:54.000 --> 58:57.000] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible [58:57.000 --> 59:01.000] and a set of free Christian books that can really help. [59:01.000 --> 59:06.000] The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today. [59:06.000 --> 59:10.000] It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes [59:10.000 --> 59:13.000] that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [59:13.000 --> 59:18.000] The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. [59:18.000 --> 59:21.000] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life [59:21.000 --> 59:24.000] clearly presents God's plan of salvation, [59:24.000 --> 59:27.000] growing in Christ and how to build up the Church. [59:27.000 --> 59:30.000] To order your free New Testament Recovery Version [59:30.000 --> 59:33.000] and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, [59:33.000 --> 59:40.000] call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102. [59:40.000 --> 59:44.000] That's 888-551-0102. [59:44.000 --> 59:49.000] Or visit us online at bfa.org. [59:49.000 --> 59:59.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [59:59.000 --> 01:00:05.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:09.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect, [01:00:09.000 --> 01:00:11.000] our liberty depends on it. [01:00:11.000 --> 01:00:14.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way [01:00:14.000 --> 01:00:17.000] to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:17.000 --> 01:00:19.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:00:19.000 --> 01:00:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:27.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:29.000] So protect your rights. [01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:32.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:35.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:00:35.000 --> 01:00:38.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:00:38.000 --> 01:00:43.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:46.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:49.000] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. [01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:52.000] They pull back the covers and find a third party there. [01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:55.000] He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. [01:00:55.000 --> 01:00:58.000] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me [01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:01.000] what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent. [01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:04.000] It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, [01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:07.000] a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. [01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:09.000] Third party, Third Amendment, get it? [01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:13.000] So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, [01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:17.000] tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment. [01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:22.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:35.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:38.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:40.000] Our liberty depends on it. [01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:43.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way [01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:46.000] to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:01:46.000 --> 01:01:48.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:52.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:01:52.000 --> 01:01:57.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:01:57.000 --> 01:01:58.000] So protect your rights. [01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:02.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:05.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:08.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:02:08.000 --> 01:02:12.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:16.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:20.000] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, [01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:22.000] or a pair of x-ray goggles. [01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:25.000] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom [01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:27.000] from unreasonable search and seizure. [01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:31.000] Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it? [01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:34.000] Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights [01:02:34.000 --> 01:02:35.000] in the name of security. [01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:40.000] Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. [01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:44.000] When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, [01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:47.000] I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells. [01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:50.000] Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights [01:02:50.000 --> 01:02:54.000] and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. [01:02:54.000 --> 01:02:55.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:01.000] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:03:01.000 --> 01:03:29.000] MUSIC [01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:42.040] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio, and we are talking to Lance [01:03:42.040 --> 01:03:51.520] in Ohio, and everybody else who's listening probably perked their ears up with what I [01:03:51.520 --> 01:03:58.680] said to you, because generally my most fun thing to do is ask a bailiff to arrest a judge [01:03:58.680 --> 01:03:59.680] in the courtroom. [01:03:59.680 --> 01:04:09.800] Now, I go after these guys, but I pick my fights very carefully. [01:04:09.800 --> 01:04:19.720] If your liberty or your fortune is at stake, then I suggest we be extremely careful. [01:04:19.720 --> 01:04:28.000] And the fact that the judge is so against you representing yourself threw up some red [01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:31.080] flags for me. [01:04:31.080 --> 01:04:35.440] Lance, what kinds of... [01:04:35.440 --> 01:04:40.160] You had a motion you wanted the lawyer to file where you give me an idea of what the [01:04:40.160 --> 01:04:46.120] nature of that motion of pleading was. [01:04:46.120 --> 01:04:57.360] My objections to the case basically is what it was. [01:04:57.360 --> 01:05:02.080] The nature of the objections? [01:05:02.080 --> 01:05:09.880] Objection to the case itself, the proceedings, I mean, the prosecutor, et cetera, and like [01:05:09.880 --> 01:05:20.680] I said, the former attorney, of course, like I said, didn't file and did not even comment [01:05:20.680 --> 01:05:25.920] or even explain the reasoning why at the time. [01:05:25.920 --> 01:05:31.960] Let me explain why I asked that question that way. [01:05:31.960 --> 01:05:44.600] We have a lot of people out here preaching what Brett and I call patriot mythology stuff. [01:05:44.600 --> 01:05:54.360] They have you do things that I honestly believe this was started by the feds and kind of in [01:05:54.360 --> 01:06:00.960] tune with Rockefeller's notion that we keep the public chasing their tails and going after [01:06:00.960 --> 01:06:04.920] issues we don't care about so we can pretty well do anything we want to. [01:06:04.920 --> 01:06:13.160] There's a lot of patriot stuff out there that will get you put in prison. [01:06:13.160 --> 01:06:22.280] This man on the land stuff and the idea that you can live in this country and not be subjected [01:06:22.280 --> 01:06:29.800] to the laws, that they don't apply to you, that what is some of the others, Brett's status, [01:06:29.800 --> 01:06:33.320] you can adjust your status so you get outside the reach of the laws. [01:06:33.320 --> 01:06:37.880] They talk about redemption and correcting your status. [01:06:37.880 --> 01:06:45.320] This has got so many people put in jail and doesn't matter, you know, I do a show with [01:06:45.320 --> 01:06:52.640] Pastor Massad every Monday and he has hosted most of these patriot guys and he told me [01:06:52.640 --> 01:07:00.920] once, you know, he started Sam Kennedy, Winston Shroud, I don't remember all the others, there's [01:07:00.920 --> 01:07:08.360] a whole stack of them and he told me that he had never encountered anyone who had achieved [01:07:08.360 --> 01:07:14.320] remedy using these techniques and he was frustrated about it. [01:07:14.320 --> 01:07:19.080] I'm frustrated with it because it reads your stuff and it sounds good but then when I dig [01:07:19.080 --> 01:07:24.120] into it, I find all the case laws garbage. [01:07:24.120 --> 01:07:29.240] So I'm wondering who put this together and that's what caused me to wonder why the judge [01:07:29.240 --> 01:07:33.800] was so concerned. [01:07:33.800 --> 01:07:42.080] If you're not using the patriot mythology, if you're following the code and using their [01:07:42.080 --> 01:07:49.880] laws the way they use their laws, then we got lots of tools. [01:07:49.880 --> 01:07:54.240] Your lawyer is a low-hanging fruit. [01:07:54.240 --> 01:08:01.960] The lawyer the court is forcing on you is especially vulnerable. [01:08:01.960 --> 01:08:06.680] You can sue him because you have a right to counsel of your choice. [01:08:06.680 --> 01:08:12.520] If you didn't choose this lawyer, then this lawyer has no business interfering with your [01:08:12.520 --> 01:08:13.520] case. [01:08:13.520 --> 01:08:19.240] You can sue him directly. [01:08:19.240 --> 01:08:20.240] Am I making sense? [01:08:20.240 --> 01:08:21.240] Yes. [01:08:21.240 --> 01:08:22.240] Okay. [01:08:22.240 --> 01:08:23.240] Yes. [01:08:23.240 --> 01:08:26.240] Thank you for that. [01:08:26.240 --> 01:08:33.400] I don't do this often but I got a real bad vibe here because the judge was pushing you [01:08:33.400 --> 01:08:35.240] so hard to have counsel. [01:08:35.240 --> 01:08:41.680] I got the impression he was seeing something that made him uncomfortable and there is a [01:08:41.680 --> 01:08:45.360] notion out there that all the judges are no good lying criminals. [01:08:45.360 --> 01:08:47.480] Well, maybe they are. [01:08:47.480 --> 01:08:51.240] If you're in a foreclosure issue, all the judges, especially federal judges have bought [01:08:51.240 --> 01:08:56.280] and paid for but this is tax court. [01:08:56.280 --> 01:09:02.400] The judges really don't have a dog in that hunt. [01:09:02.400 --> 01:09:09.480] So what has the judge done that other than a point you counseled you didn't ask for? [01:09:09.480 --> 01:09:14.480] Brett, have you ever heard of that other than Lance, I mean Ted Scarlett? [01:09:14.480 --> 01:09:15.480] Ted, yeah. [01:09:15.480 --> 01:09:19.440] They pushed it on Ted but not usually, no. [01:09:19.440 --> 01:09:27.160] That was a state court in California and California is by far the most corrupt state. [01:09:27.160 --> 01:09:35.000] They were trying to railroad him because he caught them cheating. [01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:41.040] But this is the first time I've heard of a federal judge forcing a lawyer on a client [01:09:41.040 --> 01:09:44.040] or on a litigant. [01:09:44.040 --> 01:09:48.960] Do you understand why I'm concerned? [01:09:48.960 --> 01:09:50.960] Yes. [01:09:50.960 --> 01:09:58.720] With that said, you can certainly file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge for denying [01:09:58.720 --> 01:10:03.280] you and your right to counsel of your choice. [01:10:03.280 --> 01:10:08.120] The fact that you have the right to counsel of your choice gives you the right to use [01:10:08.120 --> 01:10:19.240] yourself as counsel of your choice and it would appear he's denying you in that right. [01:10:19.240 --> 01:10:21.440] Can we talk about this off the air? [01:10:21.440 --> 01:10:22.440] Sure. [01:10:22.440 --> 01:10:23.440] Sure. [01:10:23.440 --> 01:10:24.440] Okay. [01:10:24.440 --> 01:10:25.440] Send me an email. [01:10:25.440 --> 01:10:26.440] Do you have my email? [01:10:26.440 --> 01:10:29.640] I can find it off the website. [01:10:29.640 --> 01:10:30.640] Yeah. [01:10:30.640 --> 01:10:31.640] It's randyatrouvaloradio.com. [01:10:31.640 --> 01:10:35.840] Let's talk about this off the air. [01:10:35.840 --> 01:10:41.720] I'm going to ask you some questions that's likely to piss you off big time. [01:10:41.720 --> 01:10:47.120] But when I'm comfortable that you're in the right place, I will show you how to give them [01:10:47.120 --> 01:10:49.440] a walk through the legal system. [01:10:49.440 --> 01:10:51.440] They will not believe. [01:10:51.440 --> 01:10:52.440] Okay. [01:10:52.440 --> 01:10:53.440] Okay. [01:10:53.440 --> 01:10:54.440] Yes. [01:10:54.440 --> 01:10:57.040] I'll send that email. [01:10:57.040 --> 01:10:58.480] Thank you very much. [01:10:58.480 --> 01:10:59.480] Thank you. [01:10:59.480 --> 01:11:00.480] Okay. [01:11:00.480 --> 01:11:05.040] Now, we're going to Jack in Texas. [01:11:05.040 --> 01:11:07.520] Hold on. [01:11:07.520 --> 01:11:15.440] We've got John in New York and we've only got Jack and John, but we've only got an hour [01:11:15.440 --> 01:11:18.200] left, so we may not get to you, John. [01:11:18.200 --> 01:11:20.880] We did have another first time caller. [01:11:20.880 --> 01:11:21.880] I don't know what happened. [01:11:21.880 --> 01:11:23.960] Another first time caller dropped off. [01:11:23.960 --> 01:11:24.960] Wait a minute. [01:11:24.960 --> 01:11:27.360] I'm jerking John's chain here. [01:11:27.360 --> 01:11:28.360] Yeah. [01:11:28.360 --> 01:11:29.360] Yeah. [01:11:29.360 --> 01:11:34.680] We didn't get to you last night, but we've only got an hour left, so we might not get [01:11:34.680 --> 01:11:35.680] to you tonight. [01:11:35.680 --> 01:11:38.000] Oh, our first time caller just come back. [01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:39.800] Oh, okay. [01:11:39.800 --> 01:11:40.800] Okay. [01:11:40.800 --> 01:11:42.880] We'll get to you, John. [01:11:42.880 --> 01:11:43.880] Don't worry about it. [01:11:43.880 --> 01:11:51.480] We had five callers on the board yesterday and we had one segment and three callers left. [01:11:51.480 --> 01:11:57.880] I got through two more than we thought we would, but we didn't get to you, and you really [01:11:57.880 --> 01:12:00.280] were the last one on the board. [01:12:00.280 --> 01:12:01.280] Okay. [01:12:01.280 --> 01:12:02.280] Okay. [01:12:02.280 --> 01:12:03.280] Yeah, usually. [01:12:03.280 --> 01:12:04.280] Hang on, John. [01:12:04.280 --> 01:12:05.280] We'll get to you. [01:12:05.280 --> 01:12:06.280] Okay. [01:12:06.280 --> 01:12:07.280] Okay. [01:12:07.280 --> 01:12:14.080] Okay, we pick on John a lot here, but we have fun at his expense. [01:12:14.080 --> 01:12:19.120] Okay, Jack, where were we? [01:12:19.120 --> 01:12:21.760] What do you have for us today? [01:12:21.760 --> 01:12:22.760] Not the new guy? [01:12:22.760 --> 01:12:23.760] No. [01:12:23.760 --> 01:12:24.760] Oh, yeah. [01:12:24.760 --> 01:12:25.760] Yeah, hang on. [01:12:25.760 --> 01:12:32.000] Let me take the new guy first, but he came on after I clicked you, but you, Jimmy, don't [01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:34.280] take a long time, so it'll probably be okay. [01:12:34.280 --> 01:12:35.280] All right. [01:12:35.280 --> 01:12:36.280] There's no problem. [01:12:36.280 --> 01:12:37.280] Pick the new guy. [01:12:37.280 --> 01:12:38.280] Okay. [01:12:38.280 --> 01:12:39.280] What do you have for us? [01:12:39.280 --> 01:12:40.280] Okay. [01:12:40.280 --> 01:12:41.280] Well, this is about the traffic tickets. [01:12:41.280 --> 01:12:42.280] So, the court date, which I thought was going to be last month, it was just one of those [01:12:42.280 --> 01:12:43.280] deals where they offer you a deal, and I refused to- [01:12:43.280 --> 01:12:44.280] Okay. [01:12:44.280 --> 01:12:45.280] Hold on. [01:12:45.280 --> 01:12:46.280] Hold on. [01:12:46.280 --> 01:12:47.280] That is interesting. [01:12:47.280 --> 01:12:48.280] Offer you a deal. [01:12:48.280 --> 01:12:49.280] Are you familiar with 2016? [01:12:49.280 --> 01:13:08.280] Are you familiar with 26.01 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure? [01:13:08.280 --> 01:13:09.280] No. [01:13:09.280 --> 01:13:10.280] Yeah. [01:13:10.280 --> 01:13:17.760] They sent you a notice to come to court. [01:13:17.760 --> 01:13:20.760] Did they tell you why you were ordered to court? [01:13:20.760 --> 01:13:21.760] Yeah. [01:13:21.760 --> 01:13:22.760] It was a court date. [01:13:22.760 --> 01:13:23.760] I was supposed to be on the court. [01:13:23.760 --> 01:13:24.760] Well, that's not good enough. [01:13:24.760 --> 01:13:25.760] Trial? [01:13:25.760 --> 01:13:26.760] Was it a trial? [01:13:26.760 --> 01:13:27.760] Pre-trial? [01:13:27.760 --> 01:13:28.760] What did they say? [01:13:28.760 --> 01:13:29.760] Arraignment? [01:13:29.760 --> 01:13:30.760] I believe it was a trial date. [01:13:30.760 --> 01:13:31.760] I mean- [01:13:31.760 --> 01:13:32.760] Okay. [01:13:32.760 --> 01:13:49.200] 26.01, I'm sorry, 28.01, lists all of the things the court can order you into court [01:13:49.200 --> 01:13:50.200] for. [01:13:50.200 --> 01:13:55.400] The first one is an arraignment. [01:13:55.400 --> 01:14:03.120] Second one is a trial on the merits, and all the rest go to motions or pleadings before [01:14:03.120 --> 01:14:04.120] the court. [01:14:04.120 --> 01:14:07.200] Did you have motions or pleadings before the court? [01:14:07.200 --> 01:14:08.200] Yes. [01:14:08.200 --> 01:14:17.320] I have all of yours that they flipped out over and called you names and called it all [01:14:17.320 --> 01:14:18.320] the- [01:14:18.320 --> 01:14:19.320] Yes. [01:14:19.320 --> 01:14:22.600] At this hearing, did they hear any of those motions or pleadings? [01:14:22.600 --> 01:14:29.120] No, no, it was a previous hearing that they did all the rumblings. [01:14:29.120 --> 01:14:32.400] Oh, so they were all ruled on? [01:14:32.400 --> 01:14:33.400] Yes. [01:14:33.400 --> 01:14:35.400] They were all- [01:14:35.400 --> 01:14:38.600] So you had no outstanding motions before the court? [01:14:38.600 --> 01:14:39.600] No. [01:14:39.600 --> 01:14:49.920] I had a request for admissions, I think that's it right now. [01:14:49.920 --> 01:14:53.560] So did they hear that request for admissions? [01:14:53.560 --> 01:14:54.560] No. [01:14:54.560 --> 01:14:57.560] Okay, here's the problem. [01:14:57.560 --> 01:15:05.760] The very day of the trial, but I haven't had a response, it's been more than 30 days. [01:15:05.760 --> 01:15:08.640] Okay, so they ordered you to court. [01:15:08.640 --> 01:15:13.960] They can only order you to court for a trial on the merits or for motions or pleadings [01:15:13.960 --> 01:15:17.400] or for an arraignment or motions or pleadings before the court. [01:15:17.400 --> 01:15:25.560] But in this case, it's a Class C misdemeanor and 2601 says, an arraignment may be held [01:15:25.560 --> 01:15:34.040] in the matter of a felony or a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment. [01:15:34.040 --> 01:15:41.000] Class C misdemeanors in Texas are specifically excluded from an arraignment. [01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:51.560] So they ordered you to court to meet with the prosecutor and play, let's make a deal. [01:15:51.560 --> 01:15:54.680] Am I getting that right? [01:15:54.680 --> 01:15:59.560] Oh, hold on, somehow you got muted. [01:15:59.560 --> 01:16:07.040] Okay, I'm sorry, go- no, oh, Jack's on the- he dropped off and he's back, okay. [01:16:07.040 --> 01:16:10.040] There we go. [01:16:10.040 --> 01:16:11.040] Are you back, Jack? [01:16:11.040 --> 01:16:15.760] Yes, I dropped off for a little bit, but I called right back. [01:16:15.760 --> 01:16:16.760] Okay. [01:16:16.760 --> 01:16:18.760] Did you get my question? [01:16:18.760 --> 01:16:23.720] No, go- I'll go back over it. [01:16:23.720 --> 01:16:30.120] They ordered you into court and you didn't have any active motions before the court. [01:16:30.120 --> 01:16:37.000] Under 2601, they cannot order you to court for an arraignment hearing in a Class C misdemeanor. [01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:40.440] So they ordered you to court so you could meet with the prosecutor. [01:16:40.440 --> 01:16:41.440] Yeah. [01:16:41.440 --> 01:16:48.920] If the prosecutor wants to meet with me, he can call my secretary and make an appointment. [01:16:48.920 --> 01:16:50.800] Doesn't get to order me into court. [01:16:50.800 --> 01:16:57.680] That's simulating a legal process, 32 point- what is it, Brett? [01:16:57.680 --> 01:17:00.200] Hang on, we'll be right back. [01:17:00.200 --> 01:17:04.920] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:17:04.920 --> 01:17:09.040] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [01:17:09.040 --> 01:17:13.360] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you [01:17:13.360 --> 01:17:14.680] can win two. [01:17:14.680 --> 01:17:19.320] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [01:17:19.320 --> 01:17:24.960] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer [01:17:24.960 --> 01:17:29.600] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn your [01:17:29.600 --> 01:17:33.800] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:17:33.800 --> 01:17:38.600] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:17:38.600 --> 01:17:40.760] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:17:40.760 --> 01:17:46.560] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner [01:17:46.560 --> 01:17:49.560] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [01:17:49.560 --> 01:17:58.560] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt [01:17:58.560 --> 01:18:00.240] collectors now. [01:18:00.240 --> 01:18:01.240] I love logos. [01:18:01.240 --> 01:18:04.520] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [01:18:04.520 --> 01:18:07.440] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [01:18:07.440 --> 01:18:08.440] I need my truth fix. [01:18:08.440 --> 01:18:13.320] I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air. [01:18:13.320 --> 01:18:17.080] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't [01:18:17.080 --> 01:18:20.480] have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [01:18:20.480 --> 01:18:21.840] How can I help logos? [01:18:21.840 --> 01:18:23.840] Well, I'm glad you asked. [01:18:23.840 --> 01:18:28.440] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos by ordering your supplies or [01:18:28.440 --> 01:18:29.440] holiday gifts. [01:18:29.440 --> 01:18:31.520] The first thing you do is clear your cookies. [01:18:31.520 --> 01:18:37.680] Now, go to logosradionetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [01:18:37.680 --> 01:18:43.520] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. [01:18:43.520 --> 01:18:44.520] Do I pay extra? [01:18:44.520 --> 01:18:45.520] No. [01:18:45.520 --> 01:18:47.040] Do you have to do anything different when I order? [01:18:47.040 --> 01:18:48.040] No. [01:18:48.040 --> 01:18:49.040] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [01:18:49.040 --> 01:18:50.040] No. [01:18:50.040 --> 01:18:51.040] I mean, yes. [01:18:51.040 --> 01:18:52.040] Wow. [01:18:52.040 --> 01:18:56.000] Giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect. [01:18:56.000 --> 01:18:57.000] Thank you so much. [01:18:57.000 --> 01:18:58.000] You're welcome. [01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:00.000] Happy Holidays, Logos. [01:19:28.000 --> 01:19:47.520] If I can't get everything I want, yeah, I need to get a range, yeah, hey, if I can't [01:19:47.520 --> 01:19:58.240] get everything I need, yeah, I need to get a range, yeah, hey. [01:19:58.240 --> 01:19:59.240] Okay. [01:19:59.240 --> 01:20:00.240] We are back. [01:20:00.240 --> 01:20:06.880] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio on this Friday, the 18th day of November 2022. [01:20:06.880 --> 01:20:10.120] And we're talking to Jack in Texas. [01:20:10.120 --> 01:20:18.080] And my point is, is they ordered you to come to court to meet with the prosecutor. [01:20:18.080 --> 01:20:21.640] There's a lot of things they can order you to court for. [01:20:21.640 --> 01:20:24.600] That is not one of them. [01:20:24.600 --> 01:20:33.120] That is simulating a legal process violation of 30, 32 point, what, Brett, 48? [01:20:33.120 --> 01:20:38.640] Yeah, I think it's 32, 40, penal code. [01:20:38.640 --> 01:20:43.560] There's the prosecutor with it. [01:20:43.560 --> 01:20:53.040] When I go into a traffic court, I don't talk to prosecutors, period. [01:20:53.040 --> 01:20:58.440] In Highland Park, they sent me over to talk to the prosecutor. [01:20:58.440 --> 01:20:59.720] He said, are you Mr. Kelton? [01:20:59.720 --> 01:21:05.040] I said, yes, I am, but you probably don't want to talk to me. [01:21:05.040 --> 01:21:06.040] He said, I don't? [01:21:06.040 --> 01:21:07.400] I said, no, no, you do. [01:21:07.400 --> 01:21:08.880] I'm not here to talk to you. [01:21:08.880 --> 01:21:10.800] He said, well, who are you to talk to? [01:21:10.800 --> 01:21:12.160] I'm here to talk to the judge. [01:21:12.160 --> 01:21:14.320] He said, okay, go stand in that line. [01:21:14.320 --> 01:21:16.760] But this guy was smart. [01:21:16.760 --> 01:21:19.880] He didn't try to play hardball with me. [01:21:19.880 --> 01:21:25.620] South Lake, Texas, I went with a guy who was a truck driver and a friend of mine called [01:21:25.620 --> 01:21:29.400] him, was his boss, and asked me to go with him. [01:21:29.400 --> 01:21:34.480] And they got 58 people in there, no judge, they're calling them, the lawyer's calling [01:21:34.480 --> 01:21:35.480] them into the office. [01:21:35.480 --> 01:21:42.960] This is a female lawyer her first day, like 25, 26 years old. [01:21:42.960 --> 01:21:46.840] So they call this guy and he starts to go back there and I get up with him and the bailiff [01:21:46.840 --> 01:21:47.840] said, sir. [01:21:47.840 --> 01:21:51.000] He said, Mr. Kelton, he knew who I was. [01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:52.000] You can't go back there. [01:21:52.000 --> 01:21:53.720] I said, sure I can. [01:21:53.720 --> 01:21:54.720] I'm his paralegal. [01:21:54.720 --> 01:21:59.280] I said, oh no, only the accused can go back there. [01:21:59.280 --> 01:22:02.160] I said, is the judge back there? [01:22:02.160 --> 01:22:05.200] He said, well, no, but where's the judge? [01:22:05.200 --> 01:22:08.120] Well, he's not here today. [01:22:08.120 --> 01:22:12.640] I need you to arrest the prosecutor. [01:22:12.640 --> 01:22:17.840] I need to go talk to my boss. [01:22:17.840 --> 01:22:21.620] The prosecutor had simulated a legal process. [01:22:21.620 --> 01:22:29.480] He subpoenaed these people to come to court to have a meeting with him. [01:22:29.480 --> 01:22:31.480] You can't do that. [01:22:31.480 --> 01:22:38.320] If he wants to be with me, he can call my secretary and set an appointment just like [01:22:38.320 --> 01:22:39.320] anybody else. [01:22:39.320 --> 01:22:42.320] You see my point, Jack? [01:22:42.320 --> 01:22:45.120] Yes, sir. [01:22:45.120 --> 01:22:48.760] Charge him with simulating the legal process. [01:22:48.760 --> 01:22:51.320] I take it you didn't make a deal with him? [01:22:51.320 --> 01:22:53.360] Oh no. [01:22:53.360 --> 01:22:59.840] Oh, you're such a hard man. [01:22:59.840 --> 01:23:02.360] You didn't want to empty your pockets for him. [01:23:02.360 --> 01:23:03.360] Okay. [01:23:03.360 --> 01:23:07.840] I'm not sure if I addressed your question, but that was just an issue I had. [01:23:07.840 --> 01:23:08.840] Okay. [01:23:08.840 --> 01:23:10.840] You go ahead and ask your question. [01:23:10.840 --> 01:23:11.840] Okay. [01:23:11.840 --> 01:23:19.120] Well, they have never responded to any of my pleadings or motions or whatever. [01:23:19.120 --> 01:23:22.360] So I turned in this request for admission. [01:23:22.360 --> 01:23:24.720] I believe it. [01:23:24.720 --> 01:23:27.200] They had 30 days to respond. [01:23:27.200 --> 01:23:30.400] I got no response so far. [01:23:30.400 --> 01:23:31.400] Okay. [01:23:31.400 --> 01:23:42.160] Your next step here is to file for, request the court to order discovery. [01:23:42.160 --> 01:23:46.960] But in Class C misdemeanors, they have denied you and your right to discovery. [01:23:46.960 --> 01:24:00.080] Well now, see the prosecutor did mention the clerk to give me discovery, but I mean, I [01:24:00.080 --> 01:24:01.560] don't know what the heck that would be involved. [01:24:01.560 --> 01:24:04.560] Well, look up the Michael Morton Act. [01:24:04.560 --> 01:24:06.560] I haven't gotten anything. [01:24:06.560 --> 01:24:07.560] I'm sorry? [01:24:07.560 --> 01:24:12.040] The Michael Morton Act in Texas, I forget the number on it. [01:24:12.040 --> 01:24:13.040] Yep. [01:24:13.040 --> 01:24:14.040] 3914. [01:24:14.040 --> 01:24:22.000] Okay, that one lists all of the things the prosecutor is required to give you. [01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:29.880] I was just talking to a district attorney a couple of weeks ago and he mentioned that [01:24:29.880 --> 01:24:33.680] that it requires us to give up everything. [01:24:33.680 --> 01:24:39.920] So you're required under 3914 and when they don't give it to you, that gives you great [01:24:39.920 --> 01:24:46.200] grounds for appeal, especially here, this could give you grounds for interlocutory. [01:24:46.200 --> 01:24:53.280] Well, no, this is not a dispositive ruling, so it would give you grounds for a mandamus. [01:24:53.280 --> 01:24:54.280] Yes. [01:24:54.280 --> 01:25:01.440] And in Texas, we also have, the lawyers won't tend to use this or know about it or even [01:25:01.440 --> 01:25:09.600] think that you should have it, but 3906 specifically says you get to do interrogatories, just like [01:25:09.600 --> 01:25:11.660] in civil. [01:25:11.660 --> 01:25:24.000] So you can send interrogatories to the other parties and witnesses and they've got to respond [01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:26.120] to you just like civil does. [01:25:26.120 --> 01:25:31.680] Yeah, but this is traffic under Chapter 45. [01:25:31.680 --> 01:25:32.680] So? [01:25:32.680 --> 01:25:39.920] Because 45, I think under Class C misdemeanor, you don't have a right to discovery. [01:25:39.920 --> 01:25:42.480] Well, I would like to see that. [01:25:42.480 --> 01:25:47.320] I know they like to do that, but I don't see any limits in the code for that. [01:25:47.320 --> 01:25:52.280] But even that, I would think the Michael Morton Act would override that. [01:25:52.280 --> 01:25:59.640] Well, Michael Morton Act allows the accused to have certain things and it forces them [01:25:59.640 --> 01:26:04.200] to give it, but 3906 adds to that. [01:26:04.200 --> 01:26:11.200] If Michael Morton Act orders them to give it, so there has to be some discovery. [01:26:11.200 --> 01:26:21.400] The only thing they're going to have is the traffic citation. [01:26:21.400 --> 01:26:25.800] Unless you're asking for stuff that goes to department procedures and such, what kind [01:26:25.800 --> 01:26:30.680] of stuff are you asking for, Jack? [01:26:30.680 --> 01:26:31.680] I didn't do an interrogatory. [01:26:31.680 --> 01:26:33.680] I did request for admissions. [01:26:33.680 --> 01:26:45.000] The only thing, five things I did related to the city and the police officer not having [01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:49.760] authority, no MOU. [01:26:49.760 --> 01:26:57.240] Have you filed my subject matter jurisdiction challenge for traffic? [01:26:57.240 --> 01:26:58.240] That was ignored totally. [01:26:58.240 --> 01:26:59.240] It was BS. [01:26:59.240 --> 01:27:00.240] Oh, no. [01:27:00.240 --> 01:27:08.440] It was BS at first, but then he looked at it and he said, oh, I have jurisdiction because [01:27:08.440 --> 01:27:09.440] I have jurisdiction. [01:27:09.440 --> 01:27:10.440] Out of the court. [01:27:10.440 --> 01:27:11.440] Oh, that's right. [01:27:11.440 --> 01:27:12.440] That should give a mandamus. [01:27:12.440 --> 01:27:13.440] Oh, here we go. [01:27:13.440 --> 01:27:14.440] There's Ted. [01:27:14.440 --> 01:27:26.680] Okay, who needed, Chris needed Ted. [01:27:26.680 --> 01:27:29.680] Who needed Ted? [01:27:29.680 --> 01:27:38.080] Travis Lance was the previous owner, had that in common with Ted with being pushed, having [01:27:38.080 --> 01:27:41.800] a prosecutor, I mean attorney pushed on him. [01:27:41.800 --> 01:27:42.800] Oh, okay. [01:27:42.800 --> 01:27:44.960] Okay, okay, back to Jack. [01:27:44.960 --> 01:27:47.960] We keep interrupting you. [01:27:47.960 --> 01:27:53.480] Okay, so your issue is discovery. [01:27:53.480 --> 01:27:59.840] My issue is, well, I'm not sure what they can give you for discovery. [01:27:59.840 --> 01:28:02.040] I mean, there isn't much to it. [01:28:02.040 --> 01:28:06.520] My issue, my first question is, what do I do about the request for admissions that they've [01:28:06.520 --> 01:28:09.200] never responded to and it's been more than 30 days? [01:28:09.200 --> 01:28:15.960] Okay, you file a motion to compel. [01:28:15.960 --> 01:28:22.360] If his motion to compel gets shut down, would a motion and limiting be appropriate? [01:28:22.360 --> 01:28:24.040] Motion and limiting is something else. [01:28:24.040 --> 01:28:33.000] Yeah, but if they didn't respond to it, you've got the presumption or it says it's deemed [01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:38.340] admitted, but they're going to try to say that he doesn't get to use his admissions [01:28:38.340 --> 01:28:44.960] because, oh, that's only for civil, and then he's got that extra layer of something to [01:28:44.960 --> 01:28:45.960] argue about. [01:28:45.960 --> 01:28:46.960] Yeah. [01:28:46.960 --> 01:28:48.760] I've been to that before. [01:28:48.760 --> 01:28:50.720] I'm beginning to see your point. [01:28:50.720 --> 01:28:56.480] Motion and limiting, for those who don't know, is a list of all the questions the prosecutor [01:28:56.480 --> 01:28:58.720] can't ask. [01:28:58.720 --> 01:29:05.480] So I can see where that would be valuable if the prosecutor is likely to ask a question [01:29:05.480 --> 01:29:10.960] that would depend on the documentation he refused to produce. [01:29:10.960 --> 01:29:11.960] Right. [01:29:11.960 --> 01:29:19.920] So you could ask the court to forbid the prosecutor from asking questions that went for information [01:29:19.920 --> 01:29:28.000] the prosecutor had and failed to produce, I think. [01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:32.800] But a motion and limiting is all of the questions the other side can't ask. [01:29:32.800 --> 01:29:36.120] I've got a big one in this, pretty fun. [01:29:36.120 --> 01:29:37.120] Makes them crazy. [01:29:37.120 --> 01:29:38.120] Okay. [01:29:38.120 --> 01:29:39.120] Hang on. [01:29:39.120 --> 01:29:46.520] We're about to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Brutal Law Radio. [01:29:46.520 --> 01:29:47.880] Won't give out the call-in numbers. [01:29:47.880 --> 01:29:52.440] We've got the new caller back, and then we've got Jack and Ted. [01:29:52.440 --> 01:29:55.720] Ted, I don't think I'll get to you today. [01:29:55.720 --> 01:29:57.640] We're going to run out of time. [01:29:57.640 --> 01:29:58.640] Hang on. [01:29:58.640 --> 01:30:01.640] We'll be right back. [01:30:01.640 --> 01:30:04.800] The top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America. [01:30:04.800 --> 01:30:10.640] If you build an electrical smart grid, the hackers will come and they could cause a catastrophic [01:30:10.640 --> 01:30:11.640] blackout. [01:30:11.640 --> 01:30:16.440] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment. [01:30:16.440 --> 01:30:18.160] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:18.160 --> 01:30:21.760] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:21.760 --> 01:30:26.760] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:26.760 --> 01:30:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:33.000] Privacy. [01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:34.520] It's worth hanging on to. [01:30:34.520 --> 01:30:40.120] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, [01:30:40.120 --> 01:30:41.860] Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:41.860 --> 01:30:46.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:49.920] Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into [01:30:49.920 --> 01:30:52.480] your home too with a smart grid. [01:30:52.480 --> 01:30:56.680] So they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely monitor electric [01:30:56.680 --> 01:30:59.840] use for efficiency and avoid grid failure. [01:30:59.840 --> 01:31:03.320] But cybersecurity expert David Chalk says not so fast. [01:31:03.320 --> 01:31:07.840] If we make the national power grid controllable through the web, hackers will have a field [01:31:07.840 --> 01:31:08.840] day. [01:31:08.840 --> 01:31:13.820] Working remotely, they could tap in and blackout the entire nation, leaving us vulnerable to [01:31:13.820 --> 01:31:14.820] our enemies. [01:31:14.820 --> 01:31:19.040] I've long opposed smart meters for privacy and health reasons. [01:31:19.040 --> 01:31:21.920] The catastrophic failures caused by hackers? [01:31:21.920 --> 01:31:23.520] There's nothing smart about that. [01:31:23.520 --> 01:31:31.460] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:31.460 --> 01:31:36.840] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. [01:31:36.840 --> 01:31:39.160] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:39.160 --> 01:31:43.880] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.880 --> 01:31:47.880] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow [01:31:47.880 --> 01:31:49.360] first responders are dying. [01:31:49.360 --> 01:31:50.800] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.800 --> 01:31:51.800] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:51.800 --> 01:31:53.160] I'm a New York City correctional. [01:31:53.160 --> 01:31:54.160] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.160 --> 01:31:55.760] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.760 --> 01:31:58.400] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.400 --> 01:32:00.400] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:00.400 --> 01:32:05.760] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. [01:32:05.760 --> 01:32:09.600] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going [01:32:09.600 --> 01:32:13.560] to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [01:32:13.560 --> 01:32:16.760] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [01:32:16.760 --> 01:32:20.520] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [01:32:20.520 --> 01:32:24.640] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [01:32:24.640 --> 01:32:26.080] our rights through due process. [01:32:26.080 --> 01:32:30.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the [01:32:30.000 --> 01:32:33.760] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process [01:32:33.760 --> 01:32:36.160] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [01:32:36.160 --> 01:32:40.160] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [01:32:40.160 --> 01:32:41.480] ordering your copy today. [01:32:41.480 --> 01:32:44.760] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [01:32:44.760 --> 01:32:49.240] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [01:32:49.240 --> 01:32:51.200] documents and other useful resource material. [01:32:51.200 --> 01:32:55.520] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [01:32:55.520 --> 01:33:00.600] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:33:00.600 --> 01:33:07.280] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:07.280 --> 01:33:35.560] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, we're at Fountain Rule Law Radio, and Jack, if we answered [01:33:35.560 --> 01:33:41.880] your question, I'm not even sure of what it was at this point, it was about discovery [01:33:41.880 --> 01:33:52.040] of, okay, you asked if they don't provide discovery, then you can file a motion for [01:33:52.040 --> 01:33:54.320] to compel, but what else did you have? [01:33:54.320 --> 01:34:00.680] Well, I've got a couple on it, but getting back to this request for admission, is that [01:34:00.680 --> 01:34:03.800] only for a civil, then, and not for a criminal? [01:34:03.800 --> 01:34:08.640] Yeah, that's only, as far as I know, that's only for civil, but now we're talking about [01:34:08.640 --> 01:34:14.440] that on the break, and he's saying, as far as he knows, there's no distinction. [01:34:14.440 --> 01:34:20.080] Well, the lawyers always want to say that it's only for civil, but not one lawyer has [01:34:20.080 --> 01:34:24.200] ever been able to produce any legal support to show that. [01:34:24.200 --> 01:34:28.080] Yeah, you don't want to answer the admissions. [01:34:28.080 --> 01:34:31.560] It's too scary for their whole case to get destroyed before they even get a chance to [01:34:31.560 --> 01:34:34.200] stand around and do their little skanky dance. [01:34:34.200 --> 01:34:41.760] So they really want to not have these admissions exist, but they have so far never been able [01:34:41.760 --> 01:34:46.360] to show any legal authority for that idea, they just all say it and the judge goes along [01:34:46.360 --> 01:34:47.360] with it. [01:34:47.360 --> 01:34:53.120] Yeah, the judges in municipal courts are absolutely the worst. [01:34:53.120 --> 01:34:58.840] They almost never get any blowback because of dealing with people who don't know law [01:34:58.840 --> 01:35:01.960] and they screw them at every opportunity. [01:35:01.960 --> 01:35:12.400] I like to set the judge up so I can stop filing criminal charges on them, but again, what [01:35:12.400 --> 01:35:15.800] do we have, what's your question next? [01:35:15.800 --> 01:35:19.040] I'll predict the answer to that one. [01:35:19.040 --> 01:35:21.680] Yeah, you answered that one. [01:35:21.680 --> 01:35:23.800] That's all right. [01:35:23.800 --> 01:35:32.600] Now I had turned, I turned in criminal complaints against everybody involved to a county attorney [01:35:32.600 --> 01:35:37.400] and he was supposed to take it to a magistrate. [01:35:37.400 --> 01:35:46.160] So last time- 2.05, Code of Criminal Procedure. [01:35:46.160 --> 01:35:50.000] Go ahead, that's the one that tells you I'm supposed to do that. [01:35:50.000 --> 01:35:51.000] Okay. [01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:57.640] So last time I talked to you, you told me to email him and ask him what magistrate he's [01:35:57.640 --> 01:35:58.640] turned it into. [01:35:58.640 --> 01:35:59.640] I got no response. [01:35:59.640 --> 01:36:07.280] Then you assume he didn't do it and file against him for it. [01:36:07.280 --> 01:36:11.960] Is this the elected DA or an assistant? [01:36:11.960 --> 01:36:14.920] I believe it's an assistant. [01:36:14.920 --> 01:36:20.240] Good, they're going to be chumps, especially in traffic court, they're going to be just [01:36:20.240 --> 01:36:26.320] out of law school, weren't the highest in the class so they didn't get picked up by [01:36:26.320 --> 01:36:27.320] a law firm. [01:36:27.320 --> 01:36:35.120] They're struggling to make a living and bar grieve them into the stone age. [01:36:35.120 --> 01:36:47.640] So my question is, how do I find out which magistrate to ask about these criminal complaints? [01:36:47.640 --> 01:36:50.440] You're going to have to ask them all. [01:36:50.440 --> 01:36:51.440] I'm sorry? [01:36:51.440 --> 01:36:56.160] You have to ask all the magistrates because he can give notice to any magistrate he wants [01:36:56.160 --> 01:36:57.160] to. [01:36:57.160 --> 01:36:58.160] Okay. [01:36:58.160 --> 01:37:03.880] So just call the clerk or send an email to the clerk? [01:37:03.880 --> 01:37:09.840] Yes, ask them for a case in this name and get them to say they don't have it. [01:37:09.840 --> 01:37:17.000] Okay, and then when they don't have it- Well, the problem with accusing him is there [01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:18.480] are a lot of magistrates in the county. [01:37:18.480 --> 01:37:24.600] All the judges are magistrates, all the mayors are magistrates, and especially justices of [01:37:24.600 --> 01:37:27.720] the pieces, that's why they were put in place. [01:37:27.720 --> 01:37:32.600] But it's a trick to get them all- She doesn't even know it, but she's a magistrate [01:37:32.600 --> 01:37:35.600] too. [01:37:35.600 --> 01:37:39.360] Yep, in her capacity as a recorder. [01:37:39.360 --> 01:37:43.200] A district and county clerk. [01:37:43.200 --> 01:37:53.160] All right, so I'll find the magistrate, find out that they probably didn't issue any warrants, [01:37:53.160 --> 01:37:54.160] right? [01:37:54.160 --> 01:37:57.920] Then what do I charge the magistrate with? [01:37:57.920 --> 01:37:58.920] Not the magistrate. [01:37:58.920 --> 01:38:01.040] He don't have anything to do with it yet. [01:38:01.040 --> 01:38:04.080] You charge the prosecutor with tampering with the government document. [01:38:04.080 --> 01:38:11.560] Oh, I see, because you're saying if there's no record of it, he didn't turn it in. [01:38:11.560 --> 01:38:12.560] Right. [01:38:12.560 --> 01:38:13.560] I see. [01:38:13.560 --> 01:38:19.160] Okay, well what if I find that he did turn it in and the magistrate did nothing? [01:38:19.160 --> 01:38:27.000] Then you file against the magistrate for official misconduct for denying you access to the- denying [01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:33.960] you in your first amendment right to petition the court for redress of grievance. [01:38:33.960 --> 01:38:38.320] Is that 39.03 to me? [01:38:38.320 --> 01:38:44.240] 39.03 is the penal code. [01:38:44.240 --> 01:38:45.240] Official misconduct. [01:38:45.240 --> 01:38:48.240] Which one would that be? [01:38:48.240 --> 01:38:53.240] 39.03. [01:38:53.240 --> 01:39:00.080] Because the magistrate was ordered to issue a warrant. [01:39:00.080 --> 01:39:09.480] Yes, the magistrate was ordered to issue a warrant by statute 15.09. [01:39:09.480 --> 01:39:10.480] Okay. [01:39:10.480 --> 01:39:14.760] Then what about- can I judge them with obstruction of justice? [01:39:14.760 --> 01:39:21.840] They're protecting- protecting officials- Yes, obstruction 36.06 or shielding 38.05. [01:39:21.840 --> 01:39:22.840] 38.05. [01:39:22.840 --> 01:39:25.840] That's the one I found, 38.05. [01:39:25.840 --> 01:39:26.840] Okay. [01:39:26.840 --> 01:39:33.440] Well, that gets me started then gentlemen, I sure appreciate it. [01:39:33.440 --> 01:39:34.440] Okay. [01:39:34.440 --> 01:39:35.440] Thank you, Jack. [01:39:35.440 --> 01:39:36.440] Okay. [01:39:36.440 --> 01:39:44.440] Now we're going to go to a new caller, Michelle, it looks like, in Georgia. [01:39:44.440 --> 01:39:47.440] Okay, there we go. [01:39:47.440 --> 01:39:48.440] Hello, Michelle. [01:39:48.440 --> 01:39:52.440] Oh, wait a minute, hold on, I got Jack again. [01:39:52.440 --> 01:39:53.440] Okay. [01:39:53.440 --> 01:39:54.440] No, I don't. [01:39:54.440 --> 01:39:55.440] Let's see. [01:39:55.440 --> 01:39:58.440] Okay, Michelle, you're open, I got it right. [01:39:58.440 --> 01:40:01.440] Can you hear me? [01:40:01.440 --> 01:40:02.440] Yes. [01:40:02.440 --> 01:40:03.440] Is Michelle correct? [01:40:03.440 --> 01:40:04.440] Well, yes. [01:40:04.440 --> 01:40:09.440] Old people call me Shelly, but you can call me Michelle, either one. [01:40:09.440 --> 01:40:10.440] All right. [01:40:10.440 --> 01:40:11.440] Shelly. [01:40:11.440 --> 01:40:12.440] Texas. [01:40:12.440 --> 01:40:13.440] Shelly in Texas. [01:40:13.440 --> 01:40:14.440] Okay. [01:40:14.440 --> 01:40:19.440] That's why we ask, because it comes up with a caller ID if you're not in the database, [01:40:19.440 --> 01:40:21.440] and we always ask to make sure it's right. [01:40:21.440 --> 01:40:22.440] Good. [01:40:22.440 --> 01:40:29.440] So you're not Michelle in Texas, you're Shelly in, I mean, Michelle in Georgia, you're Shelly [01:40:29.440 --> 01:40:30.440] in Texas. [01:40:30.440 --> 01:40:31.440] Shelly in Texas. [01:40:31.440 --> 01:40:32.440] Oh, 817, I knew that. [01:40:32.440 --> 01:40:33.440] Oh, yeah. [01:40:33.440 --> 01:40:34.440] What you got? [01:40:34.440 --> 01:40:39.440] Yeah, I just have a question. [01:40:39.440 --> 01:40:47.440] I am actually a power of attorney for someone that's in federal prison, and she prepared, [01:40:47.440 --> 01:40:54.440] we had a tort claim prepared against one of the prosecutors, and as a power of attorney, [01:40:54.440 --> 01:40:59.440] you know, I have signed for her several things over the past few years. [01:40:59.440 --> 01:41:06.440] Well, everything was prepared, we sent it in, and now the judge is saying that it is [01:41:06.440 --> 01:41:15.440] illegal for me to sign anything in federal court for her, especially something like that. [01:41:15.440 --> 01:41:21.440] So I didn't know what to do or how to handle that, because... [01:41:21.440 --> 01:41:23.440] What was the nature of the document? [01:41:23.440 --> 01:41:25.440] Was it a criminal complaint? [01:41:25.440 --> 01:41:28.440] No, it's not a criminal complaint. [01:41:28.440 --> 01:41:33.440] It's just a tort, like a, you know, civil. [01:41:33.440 --> 01:41:35.440] Oh, it says civil action. [01:41:35.440 --> 01:41:48.440] Well, it's easy enough to remedy, just send it to the inmate on the envelope to notice [01:41:48.440 --> 01:41:56.440] legal documents, and then ask the inmate to ask one of the jailers to verify her signature [01:41:56.440 --> 01:41:59.440] on the document, and then you can file it. [01:41:59.440 --> 01:42:00.440] Okay. [01:42:00.440 --> 01:42:05.440] They are required to provide her with a notary. [01:42:05.440 --> 01:42:10.440] The thing is, is because they're mad at me for doing paperwork for her, [01:42:10.440 --> 01:42:15.440] the prison won't allow her to even speak to me. [01:42:15.440 --> 01:42:17.440] So she's... [01:42:17.440 --> 01:42:20.440] Wait a minute, wait a minute. [01:42:20.440 --> 01:42:25.440] They can't just be mad and do that? [01:42:25.440 --> 01:42:28.440] Well, in this, they don't need to speak to you, just mail it to her. [01:42:28.440 --> 01:42:31.440] Well, they won't even let me mail anything to her. [01:42:31.440 --> 01:42:33.440] I can't mail anything to her. [01:42:33.440 --> 01:42:36.440] Well, put somebody else's name on it. [01:42:36.440 --> 01:42:37.440] Yeah. [01:42:37.440 --> 01:42:39.440] Return address. [01:42:39.440 --> 01:42:43.440] Yeah, they said that anything like that, they're just going to send it right back, [01:42:43.440 --> 01:42:45.440] and they have. [01:42:45.440 --> 01:42:48.440] They send it right back, and they just say... [01:42:48.440 --> 01:42:52.440] We've got all these remedies just to stick the mail inspectors on them, [01:42:52.440 --> 01:42:55.440] postal inspectors on them. [01:42:55.440 --> 01:43:02.440] Well, my question is, is it against the law for me to sign for her as a proper power of attorney? [01:43:02.440 --> 01:43:06.440] Not that I know of. [01:43:06.440 --> 01:43:08.440] Yeah, I didn't think so. [01:43:08.440 --> 01:43:10.440] He quoted some federal... [01:43:10.440 --> 01:43:13.440] File criminal charges against the judge. [01:43:13.440 --> 01:43:16.440] Okay. [01:43:16.440 --> 01:43:21.440] 242, 18 U.S. Code 242. [01:43:21.440 --> 01:43:26.440] Yeah, because to me, you know, if she gave me the authority to sign for her, [01:43:26.440 --> 01:43:31.440] I have all authority as the proper attorney, a power of attorney. [01:43:31.440 --> 01:43:40.440] And charge the judge with obstruction for denying the inmate [01:43:40.440 --> 01:43:47.440] and right to petition the court for redress of grievance. [01:43:47.440 --> 01:43:48.440] Yeah. [01:43:48.440 --> 01:43:51.440] There you go. [01:43:51.440 --> 01:43:52.440] Hang on. [01:43:52.440 --> 01:43:53.440] Hang on. [01:43:53.440 --> 01:43:54.440] We're about to go to break. [01:43:54.440 --> 01:43:55.440] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain. [01:43:55.440 --> 01:44:19.440] We'll be right back. [01:44:25.440 --> 01:44:29.440] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, [01:44:29.440 --> 01:44:31.440] most of which we reject. [01:44:31.440 --> 01:44:33.440] We have come to trust Jungevity so much, [01:44:33.440 --> 01:44:39.440] we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:44:39.440 --> 01:44:42.440] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, [01:44:42.440 --> 01:44:47.440] your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [01:44:47.440 --> 01:44:51.440] As you realize the benefits of Jungevity, you may want to join us. [01:44:51.440 --> 01:44:56.440] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, [01:44:56.440 --> 01:44:58.440] and increase your income. [01:44:58.440 --> 01:45:03.440] Order now. [01:45:03.440 --> 01:45:06.440] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:06.440 --> 01:45:09.440] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, [01:45:09.440 --> 01:45:14.440] the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how [01:45:14.440 --> 01:45:17.440] in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:17.440 --> 01:45:21.440] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:21.440 --> 01:45:25.440] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:25.440 --> 01:45:30.440] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:30.440 --> 01:45:36.440] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:36.440 --> 01:45:41.440] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:41.440 --> 01:45:45.440] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:45.440 --> 01:45:51.440] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:45:51.440 --> 01:45:54.440] pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:54.440 --> 01:46:03.440] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:03.440 --> 01:46:18.440] This program is brought to you by the U.S. Department of Justice [01:46:18.440 --> 01:46:48.400] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheelbarrow Radio, and we're talking to you [01:46:48.400 --> 01:46:59.400] to Shelly in Texas, unmute Shelly in Texas, okay, so the issue is they're denying this [01:46:59.400 --> 01:47:04.480] person in contact, how did they took you off the visitors list? [01:47:04.480 --> 01:47:09.320] Well, it's kind of a long story. [01:47:09.320 --> 01:47:15.440] I met her because I was a volunteer there years ago, and we just stayed in touch, you [01:47:15.440 --> 01:47:21.560] know, and I actually, you know, became her power of attorney and helped her with personal [01:47:21.560 --> 01:47:26.000] things in her family, and so she, this is just... [01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:30.400] Yeah, we're going to run out of time, we're real short here. [01:47:30.400 --> 01:47:33.480] Did you try to visit her or is this a local prison? [01:47:33.480 --> 01:47:38.400] Yeah, they won't let me visit her for sure, but because I used to be a volunteer there, [01:47:38.400 --> 01:47:44.600] but my main point is they have cut off all contact, the prison has, it wasn't the judge, [01:47:44.600 --> 01:47:47.160] the prison cut off all contact. [01:47:47.160 --> 01:47:52.480] Cut you off completely or are they cutting her off? [01:47:52.480 --> 01:47:55.160] Me and her, I can't send her... [01:47:55.160 --> 01:48:01.920] Send me the documents in an envelope, I'll put my return address out and send it. [01:48:01.920 --> 01:48:07.880] Okay, okay, so that she can sign it? [01:48:07.880 --> 01:48:16.320] Yeah, send me an email and I will send you my home address or just send it to P.O. Box [01:48:16.320 --> 01:48:17.320] 1, Boyd, Texas. [01:48:17.320 --> 01:48:20.320] Is that on your website? [01:48:20.320 --> 01:48:21.320] No. [01:48:21.320 --> 01:48:22.320] Okay. [01:48:22.320 --> 01:48:29.440] Good, just P.O. Box 1, Boyd, 76023. [01:48:29.440 --> 01:48:30.440] Okay. [01:48:30.440 --> 01:48:34.320] There's a moral behind P.O. Box 1. [01:48:34.320 --> 01:48:40.600] Never make a date with your girlfriend if your wife can be listening on the extension [01:48:40.600 --> 01:48:47.320] and you live in a mobile home, but she might come home to a slab and three suitcases. [01:48:47.320 --> 01:48:51.920] Now Beachy didn't find that as funny as I did, but he gave me his P.O. Box when he left [01:48:51.920 --> 01:48:52.920] town. [01:48:52.920 --> 01:48:58.440] Okay, get that to me, I will send it in and we'll see how this shakes out. [01:48:58.440 --> 01:48:59.440] Okay. [01:48:59.440 --> 01:49:00.440] Thank you, Randy. [01:49:00.440 --> 01:49:01.440] Okay. [01:49:01.440 --> 01:49:02.440] Thank you. [01:49:02.440 --> 01:49:09.760] Okay, now we're going to go to somebody we've never talked to before. [01:49:09.760 --> 01:49:13.680] Some John guy in Texas, no, in New York. [01:49:13.680 --> 01:49:22.320] Hello, John in New York, straight shooter, concise, to the point, what do you got for [01:49:22.320 --> 01:49:23.320] us? [01:49:23.320 --> 01:49:29.960] Well, last night I heard you with a gentleman and he was asking questions on how to proceed [01:49:29.960 --> 01:49:35.200] with taking the bad guys down with regard to what he was doing. [01:49:35.200 --> 01:49:40.120] And that had to do with COVID and stuff like that. [01:49:40.120 --> 01:49:48.760] Well, one of the best sources of information that I have ever run across is Dr. David Martin, [01:49:48.760 --> 01:49:56.200] Dr. David, D-A-V-I-D Martin, M-A-R-T-I-N. [01:49:56.200 --> 01:50:02.400] Isn't that Dr. David Chrome Dome Martin? [01:50:02.400 --> 01:50:03.400] That's right. [01:50:03.400 --> 01:50:04.400] That's right. [01:50:04.400 --> 01:50:11.200] He does have a Chrome Dome and he's probably, and he even made a comment about it. [01:50:11.200 --> 01:50:19.200] He said that he was, I forget how he put it, but anyway, he explains all the different [01:50:19.200 --> 01:50:20.200] angles. [01:50:20.200 --> 01:50:25.960] You see, the pharmaceutical companies aren't really the ones that were responsible for [01:50:25.960 --> 01:50:26.960] all this. [01:50:26.960 --> 01:50:29.720] This is a government project. [01:50:29.720 --> 01:50:35.480] DARPA was involved and he even names the name of the company who- [01:50:35.480 --> 01:50:36.480] DARPA? [01:50:36.480 --> 01:50:43.560] DARPA, you know, yeah, the government was involved with this and the pharmaceutical [01:50:43.560 --> 01:50:44.560] companies are just covers. [01:50:44.560 --> 01:50:48.760] But DARPA is a robotics company. [01:50:48.760 --> 01:50:52.680] Well, they do a lot of- [01:50:52.680 --> 01:50:55.680] They do all kinds of things. [01:50:55.680 --> 01:51:01.360] So, you've got the government really behind this and they use the pharmaceutical companies [01:51:01.360 --> 01:51:02.360] as a cover. [01:51:02.360 --> 01:51:06.480] And of course, the pharmaceutical companies make billions, and I'm meaning billions of [01:51:06.480 --> 01:51:08.560] dollars off this project. [01:51:08.560 --> 01:51:13.720] Now, Dr. David Martin, I had given you his videos. [01:51:13.720 --> 01:51:18.640] He's got two unbelievable videos where he nails it down. [01:51:18.640 --> 01:51:26.720] And if you're an attorney trying to do a lawsuit, Dr. David Martin's information is just important [01:51:26.720 --> 01:51:28.880] as all get out. [01:51:28.880 --> 01:51:34.600] And you've got to pay attention to what David is saying and he says an awful lot in his [01:51:34.600 --> 01:51:35.600] videos. [01:51:35.600 --> 01:51:40.240] I'll send them to you again if you want to see them. [01:51:40.240 --> 01:51:42.560] And he spells it out. [01:51:42.560 --> 01:51:51.480] For example, you're familiar with the situation in Nuremberg. [01:51:51.480 --> 01:51:57.040] And now they've got the Nuremberg Code as a result where they cannot use experimental [01:51:57.040 --> 01:52:04.240] vaccines or experimental drugs on anybody against their will. [01:52:04.240 --> 01:52:06.000] And there has to be informed consent. [01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:14.480] Well, when the pharmaceutical companies printed blank inserts not talking about the testing, [01:52:14.480 --> 01:52:21.960] the efficacy, the ingredients, and everything they're supposed to do by law, federal law. [01:52:21.960 --> 01:52:32.720] They broke federal law when they issued the vaccines with no inserts telling what was [01:52:32.720 --> 01:52:37.800] in them, how they got there, what the risks are, and so on and so forth. [01:52:37.800 --> 01:52:40.080] So that's not informed consent. [01:52:40.080 --> 01:52:46.440] Then to top it off, on top of it, there's so much to this we can't do it in even an [01:52:46.440 --> 01:52:47.440] hour. [01:52:47.440 --> 01:52:49.920] Well, we might be able to do it in an hour. [01:52:49.920 --> 01:52:54.760] But anyway, I'll just give you a brief overview and then I'll send you his videos. [01:52:54.760 --> 01:52:59.120] And then make sure you listen to every single word he says. [01:52:59.120 --> 01:53:04.000] If he wastes some time in one of his videos, the first seven minutes is just blah, blah, [01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:05.000] blah. [01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:06.000] And I'll warn you about that. [01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:10.800] I'll tell you, you can listen to it, but just go through it quick. [01:53:10.800 --> 01:53:15.120] And then at the seven-minute mark, that's when he begins the meat and potatoes. [01:53:15.120 --> 01:53:21.160] So- Okay, John, have you looked at our telegram channel, [01:53:21.160 --> 01:53:22.720] the Masked Law Society? [01:53:22.720 --> 01:53:27.120] I'll say that again, the telegram channel. [01:53:27.120 --> 01:53:29.320] Masked Law Society. [01:53:29.320 --> 01:53:31.520] Masked Law Society. [01:53:31.520 --> 01:53:36.080] Yeah, we've got about 1,500 people on there. [01:53:36.080 --> 01:53:40.240] And this is their area of interest. [01:53:40.240 --> 01:53:43.840] Yeah. [01:53:43.840 --> 01:53:44.840] Send me an email. [01:53:44.840 --> 01:53:46.920] I'll send you a link to it. [01:53:46.920 --> 01:53:47.920] Okay. [01:53:47.920 --> 01:53:50.280] Do you have telegram? [01:53:50.280 --> 01:53:54.480] No, I don't know anything about it, really. [01:53:54.480 --> 01:54:03.440] Well, in order to get it to work, it's an app you can download to your cell phone. [01:54:03.440 --> 01:54:09.480] And once you have it on your cell phone, then you can load it on your computer. [01:54:09.480 --> 01:54:13.720] You can't load it on your computer without having it on your cell phone. [01:54:13.720 --> 01:54:14.720] I see. [01:54:14.720 --> 01:54:15.720] All right. [01:54:15.720 --> 01:54:22.080] And that'll make it relatively easy because when you download it to your computer, your [01:54:22.080 --> 01:54:27.720] computer will come up and give you one of these hashtag boxes, and you just point the [01:54:27.720 --> 01:54:32.880] phone at it, and it'll see it and recognize it, and it'll load right up. [01:54:32.880 --> 01:54:34.160] I see. [01:54:34.160 --> 01:54:42.400] So basically, Dr. Martin says, well, there's so much that he says, I'll just do one thing. [01:54:42.400 --> 01:54:48.200] The Nuremberg Code and the Geneva Convention have been violated with those vaccines. [01:54:48.200 --> 01:54:49.200] Why? [01:54:49.200 --> 01:54:52.320] Because number one, they're not vaccines at all. [01:54:52.320 --> 01:54:56.840] And that violates federal law, that's misrepresentation. [01:54:56.840 --> 01:55:04.480] And the FDA has gone in and hammered and gunned down people practically for misrepresentation [01:55:04.480 --> 01:55:07.280] with regard to drugs. [01:55:07.280 --> 01:55:10.360] They say it's one thing, and it's really something else. [01:55:10.360 --> 01:55:11.760] So that's what they're doing. [01:55:11.760 --> 01:55:14.480] They're saying it's one thing, and it's really something else. [01:55:14.480 --> 01:55:21.200] It's an mRNA mode of medical intervention. [01:55:21.200 --> 01:55:28.760] So that's one reason why they hide behind all these 1986 rules and regulations that [01:55:28.760 --> 01:55:32.080] I guess Mr. Slick Willie enacted. [01:55:32.080 --> 01:55:39.240] You see, there's so much fraud and misrepresentation involved. [01:55:39.240 --> 01:55:45.040] They can't hide behind that law because they violated everything up the yin-yang. [01:55:45.040 --> 01:55:48.560] And so the inserts were blank. [01:55:48.560 --> 01:55:50.760] So that's not informed consent. [01:55:50.760 --> 01:55:56.840] And you've got to remember, the most important thing of all, the FDA never approved the COVID [01:55:56.840 --> 01:55:57.840] vaccine. [01:55:57.840 --> 01:56:01.840] Oh, yeah, they approved it, oh, yeah, oh, yeah, oh, yeah, oh, yeah, oh, yeah. [01:56:01.840 --> 01:56:02.960] No, they didn't. [01:56:02.960 --> 01:56:07.960] It was called emergency use authorization only. [01:56:07.960 --> 01:56:15.600] I remember the gentleman last night mentioned that 40% deaths have gone up, 40%. [01:56:15.600 --> 01:56:16.600] He's right. [01:56:16.600 --> 01:56:17.600] That was a correct figure. [01:56:17.600 --> 01:56:21.000] He knows the figure, and he had it right. [01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:27.400] 40%, the deaths have gone up ever since they started rolling out the vaccine. [01:56:27.400 --> 01:56:29.400] That's not just a coincidence. [01:56:29.400 --> 01:56:37.600] And the blood clots, oh, Al Roker, by the way, Al Roker, he got boosted, he got shot [01:56:37.600 --> 01:56:44.200] up with the regular vaccine, then he got the booster, and Al Roker has COVID. [01:56:44.200 --> 01:56:49.200] And then I can't remember who it was that got it the second time, oh, Whoopi Goldberg. [01:56:49.200 --> 01:56:52.200] Yeah, and our illustrious president. [01:56:52.200 --> 01:56:55.040] Yeah, oh, yeah. [01:56:55.040 --> 01:57:01.680] So to make a long story short, there are so many ways that you can attack this as an attorney. [01:57:01.680 --> 01:57:02.680] It isn't funny. [01:57:02.680 --> 01:57:11.720] They have left themselves wide open because of all the fraud, misrepresentation, and coercion. [01:57:11.720 --> 01:57:15.480] Supposing you're sick, supposing you've got pneumonia, and the doctor says, I need to [01:57:15.480 --> 01:57:23.200] give you penicillin, penicillin and bed rest and vitamin D, and you say, I don't want it. [01:57:23.200 --> 01:57:28.080] Well, he can't force you, even when you're sick and dying, he cannot force you. [01:57:28.080 --> 01:57:33.640] So how much less can they force you when you're not sick, you don't have COVID, you don't [01:57:33.640 --> 01:57:38.680] have any illnesses, and they want to force an experimental vaccine on you? [01:57:38.680 --> 01:57:41.320] How much more right do you have to say no? [01:57:41.320 --> 01:57:48.280] And how much more right do they, how much less of a right do they want to force it on? [01:57:48.280 --> 01:57:53.720] So that's basically it, and I'll send you, but you got to listen, you really have to [01:57:53.720 --> 01:57:58.400] listen carefully because he's got a lot of information in there when he wants to get [01:57:58.400 --> 01:57:59.400] started. [01:57:59.400 --> 01:58:00.680] Send them to me. [01:58:00.680 --> 01:58:06.480] I think I've listened to both of them, but I'll make them available on the telegram [01:58:06.480 --> 01:58:10.320] side if they're not already up there. [01:58:10.320 --> 01:58:15.800] You will find a wealth of information and a lot of people there who are interested in [01:58:15.800 --> 01:58:17.800] litigating this subject. [01:58:17.800 --> 01:58:20.280] Oh yeah, absolutely. [01:58:20.280 --> 01:58:24.440] So that's basically it, Martin, is the key. [01:58:24.440 --> 01:58:28.280] Wait a minute, John, you still got 20 seconds, you've wasted. [01:58:28.280 --> 01:58:30.480] Okay, here we go. [01:58:30.480 --> 01:58:31.480] Here we go. [01:58:31.480 --> 01:58:33.720] Never mind, you're done. [01:58:33.720 --> 01:58:34.720] Thank you, John. [01:58:34.720 --> 01:58:41.160] This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio, we're running out of time. [01:58:41.160 --> 01:58:47.440] Make sure you listen to Eddie's show at eight o'clock central, Monday nights, and us next [01:58:47.440 --> 01:58:48.440] week. [01:58:48.440 --> 01:58:49.440] Thank you for listening. [01:58:49.440 --> 01:58:56.720] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament [01:58:56.720 --> 01:58:57.920] Recovery Version. [01:58:57.920 --> 01:59:02.900] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible [01:59:02.900 --> 01:59:08.560] says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.560 --> 01:59:11.840] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.840 --> 01:59:20.800] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.800 --> 01:59:26.480] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus [01:59:26.480 --> 01:59:30.360] charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.360 --> 01:59:32.900] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.900 --> 01:59:41.280] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.280 --> 01:59:51.520] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:51.520 --> 01:59:52.520] Looking for some truth? [01:59:52.520 --> 02:00:12.640] You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.