[00:00.000 --> 00:05.920] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.920 --> 00:09.600] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.600 --> 00:11.040] Our liberty depends on it. [00:11.040 --> 00:15.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [00:15.000 --> 00:17.120] your First Amendment rights. [00:17.120 --> 00:18.720] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.720 --> 00:22.320] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.320 --> 00:27.080] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:27.080 --> 00:32.160] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.160 --> 00:33.160] Privacy. [00:33.160 --> 00:34.800] It's worth hanging on to. [00:34.800 --> 00:39.120] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search [00:39.120 --> 00:42.640] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.640 --> 00:44.640] Start over with Startpage. [00:44.640 --> 00:45.640] Spar. [00:45.640 --> 00:47.920] It's what fighters do. [00:47.920 --> 00:51.400] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:51.400 --> 00:54.640] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:54.640 --> 01:01.680] Spar with an extra P. S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, [01:01.680 --> 01:03.200] and R for religion. [01:03.200 --> 01:07.160] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, [01:07.160 --> 01:10.600] assembly, and religion, but petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.600 --> 01:14.720] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.720 --> 01:18.240] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out [01:18.240 --> 01:20.960] the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:20.960 --> 01:31.200] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.200 --> 01:34.880] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. [01:34.880 --> 01:38.320] They guarantee you the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:38.320 --> 01:39.760] Our liberty depends on it. [01:39.760 --> 01:43.680] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:43.680 --> 01:46.840] one of your constitutional rights. [01:46.840 --> 01:48.440] Privacy is under attack. [01:48.440 --> 01:52.040] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:52.040 --> 01:56.800] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:56.800 --> 02:01.840] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.840 --> 02:04.560] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [02:04.560 --> 02:08.860] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [02:08.860 --> 02:12.400] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.400 --> 02:16.000] Start over with StartPage. [02:16.000 --> 02:20.360] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill [02:20.360 --> 02:22.440] of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:22.440 --> 02:26.920] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms [02:26.920 --> 02:30.760] that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:30.760 --> 02:31.760] Get it? [02:31.760 --> 02:34.080] Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? [02:34.080 --> 02:37.680] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well [02:37.680 --> 02:43.440] when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary [02:43.440 --> 02:48.000] conduct, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which [02:48.000 --> 02:50.640] historically has proved to always be possible. [02:50.640 --> 02:52.600] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [02:52.600 --> 03:14.120] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:23.600 --> 03:51.000] the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary conduct, [03:51.000 --> 04:06.640] one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which [04:06.640 --> 04:32.880] now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now [04:32.880 --> 04:51.200] appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now appears [04:51.200 --> 05:03.560] remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote [05:03.560 --> 05:19.320] in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in [05:19.320 --> 05:35.320] Why did you have to act so mean? Don't you know you're a human being? [05:35.320 --> 05:38.320] Born of a mother with a lover, a father with a reflection, [05:38.320 --> 05:40.320] Who doesn't reflection go? [05:40.320 --> 05:50.320] I know sometimes, you wanna let go, I know sometimes, you wanna let go [05:50.320 --> 06:01.320] Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do? What you gonna do when they come for you? [06:01.320 --> 06:12.320] You're too bad, you're too rude You're too bad, you're too rude [06:12.320 --> 06:23.320] Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do? What you gonna do when they come for you? [06:23.320 --> 06:31.320] You talk it down that one, you talk it down your big ones You talk it down your mother and you talk it down your father You talk it down your brother and you talk it down your sister [06:31.320 --> 06:34.220] You talk it down that one and you talk it down your big [06:34.220 --> 06:50.220] Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do? What you gonna do when they come for you? [06:50.380 --> 06:52.140] Okay, should be working now. [06:53.980 --> 06:54.780] Oh, are we in? [06:55.580 --> 06:57.660] Yes. Did you hear the beep? [06:57.660 --> 06:58.620] No, I didn't hear the beep. [06:59.260 --> 07:01.020] This is the rule of law radio. [07:01.740 --> 07:04.620] It's Friday, the 28th of October, 2022. [07:05.260 --> 07:06.060] Beep. [07:10.060 --> 07:10.700] Randy Kelton. [07:10.700 --> 07:14.300] Do you want to tell us about the technical difficulty there? [07:14.300 --> 07:16.700] Yeah, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio. [07:16.700 --> 07:18.380] We had a little difficulty with Skype. [07:18.380 --> 07:24.300] It seems my system had two or three different versions of it running and I had to boot it. [07:25.500 --> 07:28.300] And when I booted it, it booted everybody. [07:28.300 --> 07:29.660] Anyway, we got it back up. [07:31.660 --> 07:35.100] So, do you have the collar board up? [07:35.100 --> 07:36.060] I don't know if I do. [07:37.420 --> 07:40.140] You want to go ahead and open it for collars? [07:40.140 --> 07:40.640] Yes. [07:41.340 --> 07:42.620] All right, done. [07:42.620 --> 07:54.940] Okay, I am planning to head back to Victoria County here shortly and we [07:54.940 --> 07:58.620] have a lot of nastiness planned for them. [07:59.820 --> 08:07.020] Victoria County has, you know, they've been typical for every other jurisdiction in the state, [08:07.020 --> 08:10.460] but this time I went after them strategically. [08:10.460 --> 08:15.260] I went into the JP's office and filed a complaint with, some complaints with him [08:15.740 --> 08:20.620] in the hope that he would refuse to act on them and he was very accommodating. [08:22.060 --> 08:30.220] So, I filed suit against him because when I filed the complaints against him, [08:30.220 --> 08:33.820] he had a statutory duty to issue warrants and he didn't do it. [08:35.180 --> 08:40.060] So I sued him and, you know, we went out there and we went out there and we went [08:40.060 --> 08:42.940] out there and most of you who've been listening kind of knows this story. [08:44.460 --> 08:47.100] They did the standard thing where the trial judge [08:48.300 --> 08:53.980] recused himself sui sponte so he could bring in a retired judge who could rule against me out of [08:53.980 --> 08:57.900] hand at every turn with no regard to the right of things of rule of law. [08:58.460 --> 08:59.740] Like calling in the bots. [09:00.620 --> 09:01.980] And that's exactly what they did. [09:03.180 --> 09:07.420] So, when I went in front of that judge, I gave him some criminal complaints [09:07.420 --> 09:09.980] and he refused to read them just like the first judge did. [09:11.100 --> 09:17.420] But somehow I don't think it clicked in his brain that that's why I sued the first judge. [09:18.540 --> 09:20.540] So now I'll be suing the second judge. [09:23.340 --> 09:30.460] And I got a district judge in Victoria County all lined up that I'm going to use. [09:30.460 --> 09:35.980] Mr. gum chewer and I can scream at everybody in the courtroom if I want to. [09:37.420 --> 09:39.100] We'll see how that works out for him. [09:40.060 --> 09:44.860] I will dump all these criminal complaints on him, but I got a whole stack of them. [09:46.060 --> 09:50.300] And, you know, I've been telling people that you don't have to worry about [09:50.300 --> 09:52.540] finding criminal complaints to file against these guys. [09:53.900 --> 09:56.460] They are very accommodating in that regard. [09:56.460 --> 09:58.620] They will give you more than you can get to. [09:58.620 --> 10:03.420] So, with this guy, I'm going to give him about 15 or 20 criminal complaints [10:03.420 --> 10:09.180] against various and sundry public officials and ask him to issue warrants. [10:09.180 --> 10:16.540] And when he doesn't, I'll file separately for each complaint that I give to him [10:17.420 --> 10:19.580] and then sue him personally. [10:21.100 --> 10:24.140] I bet something will start clicking in his mind about that point. [10:24.700 --> 10:25.580] I hope so. [10:25.580 --> 10:28.940] Well, I don't care. He don't matter. He's cannon fodder. [10:30.940 --> 10:37.740] If he does what I ask him to, he will provide precedent to show that what the other guys [10:38.540 --> 10:41.740] did was improper and this guy did it right. [10:42.700 --> 10:47.340] If he does what everybody else did, then he'll open the door to the federal court. [10:48.380 --> 10:52.860] So I can go to the federal court and say, I went to the JP, I went to the county court, [10:52.860 --> 10:55.900] I went to the district court, and they all did the same thing. [10:55.900 --> 10:58.460] I'm out of remedy in the state. [10:59.420 --> 11:03.020] They all denied me in procedural due process. [11:04.300 --> 11:06.860] Procedural due process is harm per se. [11:08.860 --> 11:16.940] And because all of them acted in concert and collusion toward an ongoing, [11:16.940 --> 11:22.620] by committing predicate acts toward an ongoing criminal conspiracy, [11:22.620 --> 11:26.220] that is the definition of pattern and practice. [11:27.820 --> 11:33.660] So I'm telling these guys, I'm setting you up so I can sue you in the federal court. [11:35.500 --> 11:39.180] Sorry, I'm giving you a hard time, but you just my crash dummy. [11:39.180 --> 11:44.060] This is what I told the constable and bailiff for the state. [11:44.060 --> 11:47.900] The constable and bailiff for justice and peace. [11:47.900 --> 11:49.580] I'm just using you as a crash dummy. [11:50.380 --> 11:51.500] I don't care about you guys. [11:52.460 --> 11:57.900] I'm just making sure I touch all the bases on my way to the federal court [11:57.900 --> 12:00.300] so I can sue you under RICO in the federal court. [12:01.500 --> 12:02.620] Now they know I'm doing that. [12:04.220 --> 12:06.060] But there's not a thing they can do about it. [12:06.940 --> 12:07.660] They could do it right. [12:07.660 --> 12:09.180] They could follow the law, they could do it right, [12:09.180 --> 12:10.540] but you know they're not going to do that. [12:10.540 --> 12:14.460] But they just cannot bring themselves to. [12:14.460 --> 12:16.380] I have a son-in-law who's a JP. [12:18.380 --> 12:20.300] I went through these codes with him. [12:21.500 --> 12:22.860] He looked at the codes. [12:22.860 --> 12:25.580] He read my pleadings and he said, [12:25.580 --> 12:28.300] I agree with you that appears to be what the law says, [12:29.180 --> 12:33.020] but that's not how I was trained. [12:33.020 --> 12:38.300] And he just sent a guy, a denial of an examining trial. [12:39.820 --> 12:40.300] Oh boy. [12:40.300 --> 12:42.300] Oh, he did it in writing. [12:44.060 --> 12:47.740] And I'm going to want to know who told you to do this? [12:49.340 --> 12:51.100] And what were you thinking? [12:51.100 --> 12:53.660] Did you not see the underlying law? [12:55.100 --> 12:57.660] Was it not clear to you what the law said? [12:58.300 --> 13:00.300] And did you not hear the train? [13:00.300 --> 13:04.220] And did you not hear the train coming straight at you? [13:05.100 --> 13:06.940] Yeah, that light at the end of the tunnel. [13:08.060 --> 13:09.500] It wasn't your salvation. [13:12.060 --> 13:13.340] It was the train. [13:15.740 --> 13:19.500] But anyway, so I'm not, I can't go after my son-in-law. [13:21.180 --> 13:24.940] So I'm going after Victoria County instead. [13:26.220 --> 13:28.460] And I will bring them to the federal court. [13:28.460 --> 13:31.500] And it should get interesting with it. [13:31.500 --> 13:34.300] I'll bring them there with about a $400 million lawsuit. [13:36.940 --> 13:41.740] But I'm also, my son-in-law also gave me Texas State University [13:41.740 --> 13:46.540] because I asked him, who told you to do this this way? [13:46.540 --> 13:48.540] Well, this is the way I was trained to do it. [13:48.540 --> 13:50.540] Who trained you? [13:50.540 --> 13:52.540] Texas State University. [13:53.500 --> 13:56.620] Oh my goodness, a university. [13:56.620 --> 13:59.820] A university is not a public official [14:00.700 --> 14:03.420] and they don't have qualified immunity. [14:04.780 --> 14:07.340] They don't have any immunity of any kind. [14:08.540 --> 14:11.580] So they've conspired with all the magistrates and police [14:11.580 --> 14:14.940] and prosecutors and judges in the state of Texas [14:14.940 --> 14:16.460] to obstruct justice. [14:17.420 --> 14:23.420] And they're costing the state of Texas $990 million a year [14:23.420 --> 14:28.940] and $90 million a year in pretrial incarceration. [14:29.900 --> 14:35.660] And another $254 million in court appointed counsel. [14:36.860 --> 14:44.380] That is half of the entire criminal justice budget that is insane. [14:44.380 --> 14:56.300] So asking for $400 million to stop the loss of $1.2 billion per year, relatively chump change. [14:58.620 --> 14:59.660] That's my strategy. [15:00.220 --> 15:03.020] We got a whole board full of callers, so I'll shut up now. [15:03.900 --> 15:10.300] And we'll go to, let's see, we got Jason in California, [15:10.300 --> 15:15.980] Jason in Washington, Wisconsin, John in Kansas. [15:18.380 --> 15:22.220] We talked to Jason quite a while, so I'll go ahead and take John in Kansas first. [15:22.780 --> 15:24.380] And then we've got Scott in Georgia. [15:25.020 --> 15:28.060] Okay, going to Jason, John in Kansas. [15:28.780 --> 15:32.540] Hello, John, what do you have for us today? [15:33.980 --> 15:35.020] Hey, Randy, how are you doing? [15:36.860 --> 15:38.300] Pretty good for an old fat guy. [15:38.300 --> 15:39.980] Okay. [15:39.980 --> 15:44.140] Well, I know that I hear the music, but I'm calling regard to a call a couple weeks ago [15:45.340 --> 15:51.420] for Chris in Missouri on his trespassing disorderly conduct case in Kansas. [15:52.620 --> 15:54.300] Okay, your time's up. [15:55.900 --> 15:58.860] Hold on, we're out of time on this side. [15:58.860 --> 16:02.460] I've got Chris, I think I've got, no, I thought I had Chris on here. [16:02.460 --> 16:02.700] Okay. [16:02.700 --> 16:08.060] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits? [16:08.700 --> 16:12.380] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [16:12.380 --> 16:17.980] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. [16:17.980 --> 16:21.980] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court [16:21.980 --> 16:24.140] using federal civil rights statute. [16:24.140 --> 16:27.820] What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons? [16:27.820 --> 16:29.820] How to answer letters and phone calls? [16:29.820 --> 16:32.460] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report? [16:32.460 --> 16:37.100] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? [16:37.100 --> 16:41.980] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [16:41.980 --> 16:44.380] Personal consultation is available as well. [16:44.380 --> 16:47.740] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com [16:47.740 --> 16:52.780] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [16:52.780 --> 17:00.620] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com [17:00.620 --> 17:03.020] to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [17:30.860 --> 17:34.140] rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [17:34.140 --> 17:38.300] that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [17:38.300 --> 17:42.300] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com [17:42.300 --> 17:43.660] and ordering your copy today. [17:43.660 --> 17:47.100] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [17:47.100 --> 17:50.700] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [17:50.700 --> 17:53.660] hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. [17:53.660 --> 17:57.580] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [17:57.580 --> 18:01.740] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [18:27.580 --> 18:46.700] The world is spinning like it's out of control On the edge of a hole, inside a deep dark [18:46.700 --> 18:51.740] dome I'm always on the lookout for something to soothe my soul [18:51.740 --> 19:04.140] So I sit back and watch the other dead sun fall And I see justice is the goal [19:21.740 --> 19:23.660] On the break, so I was a little bit late coming back. [19:24.780 --> 19:27.820] I won't relate it to you because it's just too nasty. [19:30.620 --> 19:34.140] John, have you ever had a billy goat pee in your mouth? [19:35.980 --> 19:36.700] In my mouth? [19:37.340 --> 19:38.060] Yeah. [19:38.060 --> 19:41.020] I've had, no, not in my mouth, I've had a billy goat. [19:41.020 --> 19:41.820] Hasn't everybody? [19:42.780 --> 19:46.220] Well, I have and it really, really sucks. [19:49.020 --> 19:49.660] Okay. [19:49.660 --> 19:49.980] Well. [19:49.980 --> 19:51.420] Where were we? [19:54.220 --> 19:57.900] Well, I was just kind of getting caught up on the case. [19:57.900 --> 20:05.020] And so Chris from Missouri, he got arrested in Kansas on criminal trespass and disorderly [20:05.020 --> 20:05.500] conduct. [20:05.500 --> 20:11.660] And we had a municipal trial and we set them up in the collateral estoppel and we're on appeal. [20:13.100 --> 20:18.140] But I'm getting prepared to get prepared for a federal lawsuit. [20:18.140 --> 20:23.260] So my main question tonight is about the statute of limitations, [20:25.420 --> 20:28.700] federal statute of limitations, which obviously go off the state. [20:29.900 --> 20:37.580] My issue with the statute of limitations is with the private corporation that the, [20:37.580 --> 20:40.540] you know, the business that he got trespassed from. [20:40.540 --> 20:49.340] And then, you know, I want to sue them along with the municipality and all the police officers [20:51.100 --> 20:54.220] for false imprisonment and negligence. [20:56.300 --> 21:01.180] In Kansas, for false imprisonment, the statute of limitations is one year. [21:01.180 --> 21:14.060] The issue is with the, I don't have a problem with the, suing the municipalities and the police [21:14.060 --> 21:19.260] officers in Kansas, the Kansas Tort Claims Act covers everybody, covers them all. [21:19.260 --> 21:23.100] And I can toll that statute of limitations in Kansas. [21:24.140 --> 21:27.260] The issue, the question I have is with the private corporation. [21:27.260 --> 21:31.580] I want to, I can get that lawsuit filed within the statute of limitations, [21:33.100 --> 21:35.420] but shouldn't I sue them all together? [21:36.380 --> 21:43.580] And if I can't sue them all together, should I go ahead, sue the private corporation and- [21:43.580 --> 21:48.700] No, no, no, no, no, you have to, if they are all involved in the same case, [21:48.700 --> 21:50.460] you have to sue them all together. [21:50.460 --> 21:52.220] You can't sue them individually. [21:52.220 --> 21:56.140] If you tried it, they would do a join during. [21:56.140 --> 22:00.780] Well, that's what I was thinking to go ahead and get the statute of limitations going for [22:00.780 --> 22:09.180] the false imprisonment of the private corporation so that, and then join the municipalities once [22:09.180 --> 22:12.860] the Tort Claims Act is in effect. [22:12.860 --> 22:18.140] Okay, wait, wait, why would you do the one separate? [22:18.140 --> 22:23.420] If you have a action, do you have any action in place against the municipality [22:25.500 --> 22:27.420] that doesn't involve false imprisonment? [22:28.860 --> 22:35.180] Oh yeah, 1983 and yeah, we're going to sue them all for 1983. [22:35.180 --> 22:41.820] Okay, then just amend your complaint to include the false imprisonment charge. [22:41.820 --> 22:44.700] If false imprisonment arose out of the same issue, [22:44.700 --> 22:50.060] charge if false imprisonment arose out of the same issues that are before the federal court, [22:51.180 --> 22:54.940] then the federal court can hear both the state and federal issues. [22:56.620 --> 22:59.660] So they should all be in the same court, sued in the same suit. [23:01.420 --> 23:05.420] Okay, so my issue is with the Kansas Tort Claim Act and the federal is going to call, [23:05.420 --> 23:08.380] they're going to, they're going to follow the Tort Claims Act. [23:08.940 --> 23:11.820] Once you get a notice, they have 120 days. [23:11.820 --> 23:17.740] Okay, yeah, the Fed, okay, this is the way they do it. [23:18.860 --> 23:24.540] If you have a state claim and a Fed claim, you can file it in the state. [23:25.740 --> 23:29.020] And if opposing counsel doesn't remove it to the Fed, [23:29.580 --> 23:32.540] the state can hear the state claim and the Fed claim. [23:34.220 --> 23:39.740] If you have both, you can file it in the Fed, you choose your venue. [23:39.740 --> 23:43.820] If you file it in the Fed, the Fed can hear both the Fed and the state claim. [23:45.660 --> 23:49.580] But they have to go by either state or federal law, whichever one applies. [23:51.660 --> 23:52.460] Does that make sense? [23:53.340 --> 23:58.380] It does make sense, but we have to do the Fed because Chris is from Missouri, [23:58.380 --> 24:03.180] the municipality and the private corporation are in Kansas, so he has to do it. [24:03.180 --> 24:07.820] Okay, you've got diversity, yes, you, you don't have to, [24:07.820 --> 24:13.340] well, you don't have to, but opposing party can remove it. [24:14.220 --> 24:17.820] And I would say if you're suing the state, do it in the Fed. [24:19.260 --> 24:19.580] Right. [24:21.420 --> 24:28.460] Because the Feds are not quite so accommodating to the states as the states are. [24:29.580 --> 24:36.620] We can't, yes, I hear you, Randy, but we can't sue the municipality until they either deny [24:36.620 --> 24:39.740] the claim or 120 days. [24:39.740 --> 24:46.860] And then, but after the 120 days, the statute of limitations for false imprisonment to the [24:46.860 --> 24:51.820] private corporation will be, it'll be extinguished. [24:52.700 --> 24:57.580] Well, if you have a, if you have a false imprisonment claim, you don't owe them anything. [24:58.540 --> 25:03.260] Are they saying that you have to give them notice in 120 days to respond? [25:03.260 --> 25:07.500] No, only for the private, not the municipality. [25:08.780 --> 25:11.100] We don't have to give notice to the private company. [25:12.060 --> 25:14.220] And sue the private companies straight up. [25:15.660 --> 25:18.300] Just sue them separate if you need to, just get them sued. [25:19.500 --> 25:25.340] And then if you file against the municipality, then you can do a jointer and join them together. [25:25.340 --> 25:27.340] But do not miss your window. [25:28.620 --> 25:30.700] Yes, yes, Randy, that's my question. [25:30.700 --> 25:32.060] That's what I think I should do. [25:32.060 --> 25:35.900] That's what I was thinking, to make sure that we don't miss it and then join them afterwards. [25:36.540 --> 25:38.620] Right, yeah, that plan makes a lot of sense to me. [25:38.620 --> 25:43.260] That seems like a solid, like you've already got it all worked out and I would say you're right. [25:44.540 --> 25:50.540] Okay, that's what I'm making sure that I have that, I just want to make sure that that will work. [25:50.540 --> 25:56.300] So I'm going to sue, if the Salvation Army in Kansas, sue them for false imprisonment and [25:56.300 --> 26:03.660] negligence and then we're going to notice the municipality, they're most likely going to take [26:03.660 --> 26:05.500] 120 days from all my research. [26:05.500 --> 26:10.540] They're always going to take 120 days and then sue them and then join them. [26:10.540 --> 26:17.660] And then now I've got them joined in the federal court and then, and then now that- [26:17.660 --> 26:22.540] Right, right, do not let the clock run out on one while you're waiting for the other. [26:22.540 --> 26:30.380] Yes, that is where I'm, that is my number one thing I've been researching like crazy to make [26:30.380 --> 26:33.980] sure I got the statute of limitations and the tolling and everything else figured out. [26:33.980 --> 26:35.660] So, but that's where I'm at. [26:35.660 --> 26:39.580] I need to make sure I don't lose that. [26:41.580 --> 26:44.860] I just have one more, I think that that answers my question. [26:44.860 --> 26:48.220] That gives me, you know, a direction to go to make sure I get everything done. [26:48.220 --> 26:51.900] My next question is regarding negligence. [26:53.420 --> 27:00.140] So, obviously, we're going to have a lot of due process violations that we're going to [27:00.140 --> 27:03.420] go against the municipality. [27:03.420 --> 27:13.020] So, all the statutes that they broke that would go towards his due process, that's all [27:13.020 --> 27:14.060] negligence. [27:14.060 --> 27:20.860] So, when you sue them, you're suing them for negligence. [27:20.860 --> 27:22.380] No, no, no, no, no. [27:22.380 --> 27:24.140] Do not sue them for negligence. [27:25.180 --> 27:27.980] A due process violation is a cause of action. [27:29.100 --> 27:29.420] Okay. [27:30.140 --> 27:33.820] And a violation of due process is harm per se. [27:35.580 --> 27:37.340] You don't have to prove up harm. [27:38.700 --> 27:39.020] Okay. [27:39.660 --> 27:40.700] It's harm on its face. [27:40.700 --> 27:42.060] Do not go to negligence. [27:42.060 --> 27:51.420] If you have another way to go because negligence goes to the facts and goes to the discretion [27:51.420 --> 27:51.980] of the court. [27:53.260 --> 27:53.660] Okay. [27:53.660 --> 27:55.820] What constitutes negligence? [27:57.900 --> 28:00.780] That's going to depend on the individual judge. [28:00.780 --> 28:04.380] And if he wants, you know, if you're going after public officials, [28:05.420 --> 28:10.700] he's going to exercise his discretion to your detriment. [28:10.700 --> 28:12.380] Okay. [28:12.380 --> 28:18.460] Well, what about, like, just specifically the fact that he wasn't taken, the Kansas [28:18.460 --> 28:23.980] law specifically says he's to be taken not only because he got picked up by municipal [28:23.980 --> 28:27.420] police officers, he's supposed to go to a police station, but he's also supposed to [28:27.420 --> 28:28.860] be taken before the magistrate. [28:29.420 --> 28:34.700] That's a direct, those are mandates, that's ministerial. [28:36.940 --> 28:37.820] Exactly. [28:37.820 --> 28:40.860] And that's due process violation. [28:40.860 --> 28:43.260] That is a tort claim on its own. [28:44.220 --> 28:46.300] It doesn't need negligence to support it. [28:47.260 --> 28:47.500] Okay. [28:49.180 --> 28:50.060] Hang on. [28:50.060 --> 28:53.020] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. [28:53.020 --> 28:56.780] I called in number 512-646. [28:56.780 --> 29:01.260] Oh, well, we got a full board, so I'm not even going to give you the rest of that out. [29:01.260 --> 29:01.980] We'll be right back. [29:01.980 --> 29:09.740] It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively [29:09.740 --> 29:11.020] affected our health? [29:11.020 --> 29:15.020] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings about how [29:15.020 --> 29:17.900] cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry. [29:18.700 --> 29:20.540] Privacy is under attack. [29:20.540 --> 29:24.140] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [29:24.140 --> 29:28.940] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [29:28.940 --> 29:34.220] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [29:34.220 --> 29:35.100] Privacy. [29:35.100 --> 29:36.700] It's worth hanging on to. [29:36.700 --> 29:41.260] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search [29:41.260 --> 29:44.380] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [29:44.380 --> 29:46.300] Start over with Startpage. [29:47.980 --> 29:50.460] Cell phones emit radio frequency energy. [29:50.460 --> 29:51.340] It's a fact. [29:51.340 --> 29:55.180] But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head [29:55.180 --> 29:56.380] has been disputed. [29:56.380 --> 30:00.780] Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns. [30:00.780 --> 30:05.100] Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones [30:05.100 --> 30:06.460] affect brain chemistry. [30:06.460 --> 30:11.660] A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest [30:11.660 --> 30:15.100] to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on. [30:15.100 --> 30:19.340] While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any [30:19.340 --> 30:20.140] chances. [30:20.140 --> 30:23.660] I always keep the phone far from my body, and I use a corded headset. [30:23.660 --> 30:28.300] Look after Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [30:53.660 --> 31:09.340] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [31:09.340 --> 31:10.140] Word? [31:10.140 --> 31:15.180] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time [31:15.180 --> 31:20.460] for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy [31:20.460 --> 31:26.300] 2.15, study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, [31:26.300 --> 31:28.700] rightly dividing the word of truth. [31:28.700 --> 31:33.100] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse [31:33.100 --> 31:36.220] by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [31:36.220 --> 31:41.020] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [31:41.020 --> 31:43.260] and Christian character development. [31:43.260 --> 31:47.740] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [31:47.740 --> 31:52.300] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness [31:52.300 --> 31:54.300] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [31:54.300 --> 32:01.100] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and [32:01.100 --> 32:07.100] motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [32:07.100 --> 32:18.220] We're listening to the LogosRadioNetwork at LogosRadioNetwork.com. [32:18.220 --> 32:44.300] Yeah, I got a warrant and I gonna solve them, to the help of government them, prosecute them. [32:44.300 --> 32:59.100] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Bret Fountain, Root of Law Radio. [32:59.100 --> 33:02.500] On this Friday, the what, Bret? [33:02.500 --> 33:06.900] 28th of October, 2022. [33:06.900 --> 33:12.020] Almost my sonnet, my grandson's birthday, Halloween. [33:12.020 --> 33:13.340] Almost another year gone. [33:13.340 --> 33:16.420] Okay, and we're talking to John in Kansas. [33:16.420 --> 33:19.540] John, have we handled everything for you? [33:19.540 --> 33:23.180] Yeah, I think so. [33:23.180 --> 33:27.540] My main question, it gives me a direction because I'm ready to, I'm already writing [33:27.540 --> 33:32.460] these laws, these federal lawsuits, and I just want to make sure that everything's going [33:32.460 --> 33:33.460] good. [33:33.460 --> 33:38.340] So all the causes of that, all the statutes that they're violating, that's all due process. [33:38.340 --> 33:44.060] So for every statute that they broke that goes to his due process, that's a separate [33:44.060 --> 33:45.060] count. [33:45.060 --> 33:46.060] Exactly. [33:46.060 --> 33:47.060] Okay. [33:47.060 --> 33:50.020] It's also a criminal act. [33:50.020 --> 33:51.020] Yes. [33:51.020 --> 33:53.260] Oh yeah, we've got criminal complaints. [33:53.260 --> 33:58.620] I mean, we're, Chris from Missouri, I mean, he's, I think he sent in three criminal complaints [33:58.620 --> 33:59.620] this week. [33:59.620 --> 34:02.300] We're getting the criminal complaints in. [34:02.300 --> 34:05.180] Okay, how are you doing the criminal complaints? [34:05.180 --> 34:08.620] Who are you sending them to? [34:08.620 --> 34:14.020] We got to send them to the chief magistrate of the county court or the district court [34:14.020 --> 34:15.020] in Kansas. [34:15.020 --> 34:19.460] And then we have to send one to the DA and the attorney general. [34:19.460 --> 34:26.980] And what does the codes direct these public officials to do with those complaints? [34:26.980 --> 34:33.860] Well, the judge, and we talked about this last time, the judge, he gets in Kansas, he [34:33.860 --> 34:39.180] gets to establish probable cause. [34:39.180 --> 34:43.700] Does it say specifically how he's to do that? [34:43.700 --> 34:47.940] How does he communicate his determination? [34:47.940 --> 34:51.740] How does he find probable cause in accordance with due process? [34:51.740 --> 34:57.260] And how does he communicate that probable cause to the court? [34:57.260 --> 34:58.260] That I don't know. [34:58.260 --> 35:02.620] That, and even last time you told me to do it and I've just been so busy on this statute [35:02.620 --> 35:07.620] of limitations, I haven't drilled down on that yet, but that's something that we got [35:07.620 --> 35:09.420] to get figured out. [35:09.420 --> 35:19.500] But as far as those, I mean, those will, we can get those worked out that they're getting [35:19.500 --> 35:20.500] through. [35:20.500 --> 35:26.620] He's noticing that when he had went back again and these people, they're starting to treat [35:26.620 --> 35:27.620] him different. [35:27.620 --> 35:33.660] They're realizing that he's, you know, he's submitting a lot of criminal complaints, bar [35:33.660 --> 35:35.180] grievances and everything else. [35:35.180 --> 35:40.060] And that's all good and well with the lawsuit that we're getting ready to go to. [35:40.060 --> 35:44.180] I mean, that'll be the nail in the coffin for these guys. [35:44.180 --> 35:53.660] I just had one last question, Randy, specifically, the judge and the prosecutor, these guys are, [35:53.660 --> 35:59.660] they violate some, they're violating so many statutes of a standard legal process. [35:59.660 --> 36:03.020] And then I know that you're suing the judge. [36:03.020 --> 36:04.860] What is the cause of action? [36:04.860 --> 36:05.860] What are you suing them for? [36:05.860 --> 36:06.860] Okay. [36:06.860 --> 36:07.860] Here's the deal. [36:07.860 --> 36:15.020] The way you want to get to the judge is you ask the judge to do something over which he [36:15.020 --> 36:20.140] has no discretion. [36:20.140 --> 36:24.420] Those would be different in Missouri, but for Kansas. [36:24.420 --> 36:32.140] But in Texas, the code says under 16.09, when a complaint is forwarded to a magistrate complete [36:32.140 --> 36:39.140] in accordance with the 15.05, and that just lists the requisites of a complaint, the magistrate [36:39.140 --> 36:42.580] shall issue a warrant for threat. [36:42.580 --> 36:46.260] You want to look for shall. [36:46.260 --> 36:49.780] Shall does not mean may, might or can if he wants to. [36:49.780 --> 36:51.460] It's obligatory. [36:51.460 --> 36:53.060] It means a must. [36:53.060 --> 37:02.120] When the judge is directed to do a certain thing and they fail to do that certain thing, [37:02.120 --> 37:06.660] that thing they're directed to do is administrative. [37:06.660 --> 37:10.900] It's not judicial as he has no discretion. [37:10.900 --> 37:16.140] And when he has no discretion, he has no immunity. [37:16.140 --> 37:24.620] So look at the criminal procedure code and look at what it says the judge must do. [37:24.620 --> 37:32.020] If he has discretion to determine probable cause, then once he determines probable cause [37:32.020 --> 37:39.980] or does not, determines that there is no probable cause, what is he directed to do specifically? [37:39.980 --> 37:49.020] Like in Texas, in Texas it says that he's to issue a warrant and forward the warrant [37:49.020 --> 37:52.060] to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction. [37:52.060 --> 37:59.860] That's 16.17, 17.30 says that after an examining trial, the judge shall seal all documents [37:59.860 --> 38:02.220] had in the hearing. [38:02.220 --> 38:07.320] The complaint, statement of witnesses and all other documents shall be sealed up in [38:07.320 --> 38:13.660] an envelope with the name of the judge written across the envelope. [38:13.660 --> 38:17.180] Look in your code for those kinds of prescriptions. [38:17.180 --> 38:25.900] They're going to have a way statutorily to move the complaint from a simple complaint [38:25.900 --> 38:32.620] by a citizen or a policeman to a claim that the court can adjudicate. [38:32.620 --> 38:40.360] And then that claim that gets determined by a magistrate must somehow move from the magistrate [38:40.360 --> 38:44.900] to the clerk of the court. [38:44.900 --> 38:48.700] It's like they go out of their way not to do it right. [38:48.700 --> 38:54.060] So read that part of your criminal procedure code real careful. [38:54.060 --> 39:02.740] Yeah, I have and in Kansas it's a little bit different in that kind of the process that [39:02.740 --> 39:05.420] you just laid out is in two separate statutes. [39:05.420 --> 39:11.300] But once he finds probable cause, then the next action that he's supposed to take, if [39:11.300 --> 39:19.340] there is probable cause, then he is to issue a warrant and that says he shall issue a warrant. [39:19.340 --> 39:25.460] So it is similar, but I think the only difference is the judge gets to find probable cause. [39:25.460 --> 39:30.260] But I guess my main question is what is, if you're suing the judge, but what are you suing [39:30.260 --> 39:31.260] him for? [39:31.260 --> 39:33.700] What's the cause of action? [39:33.700 --> 39:37.100] What am I suing, what are you suing that judge for? [39:37.100 --> 39:42.380] In Kansas, it will almost certainly be official misconduct. [39:42.380 --> 39:45.620] Official misconduct is our catchall. [39:45.620 --> 39:52.540] If a public official fails to perform a duty he's required to perform and in the process [39:52.540 --> 39:57.460] denies you full and free access to enjoyment of a right and that right is the due course [39:57.460 --> 40:02.820] of the laws, then that's a crime in most every state. [40:02.820 --> 40:08.300] In Texas, it's called official oppression, in most other states it's called official [40:08.300 --> 40:13.580] misconduct and in the Fed, it's called official misconduct. [40:13.580 --> 40:19.260] Anything they're supposed to do that they don't do, you can hammer them with this and [40:19.260 --> 40:25.340] let them prove that they have some affirmative defense. [40:25.340 --> 40:31.900] Their problem, not your problem, this lets you bring them in the front door. [40:31.900 --> 40:38.020] Okay, so on the Fed and the Fed lawsuit that I'm going, so I can just hit them all with [40:38.020 --> 40:49.100] that then and then for every ministerial duty that they violate is another official misconduct. [40:49.100 --> 40:54.540] Yeah, and look up civil conspiracy in the Fed. [40:54.540 --> 41:02.820] I just wrote an argument on that early this morning, about two o'clock this morning on [41:02.820 --> 41:04.500] civil conspiracy. [41:04.500 --> 41:10.220] Since you want to sue them, that's where you get them. [41:10.220 --> 41:13.260] Okay, okay, great. [41:13.260 --> 41:14.660] I appreciate it, Randy. [41:14.660 --> 41:16.740] And yeah, that's good. [41:16.740 --> 41:21.180] That gets me some marching orders, you know, here for the near future and I appreciate [41:21.180 --> 41:22.180] it. [41:22.180 --> 41:23.180] Thank you. [41:23.180 --> 41:24.180] Okay. [41:24.180 --> 41:25.180] Thank you, John. [41:25.180 --> 41:26.180] Okay. [41:26.180 --> 41:27.180] Now we're going to Jason in Wisconsin. [41:27.180 --> 41:28.180] Hello, Jason. [41:28.180 --> 41:29.180] Hey, Randy. [41:29.180 --> 41:30.180] How's it going? [41:30.180 --> 41:31.180] It's going good. [41:31.180 --> 41:36.900] I got your email, you have a hearing coming up? [41:36.900 --> 41:43.100] Yeah, on Tuesday, my trial. [41:43.100 --> 41:46.180] Generally those trials don't happen. [41:46.180 --> 41:51.740] You're going to go in, they're going to make you a deal and I suspect you'll tell them [41:51.740 --> 41:56.980] to take their deal and cram it. [41:56.980 --> 42:01.020] And they'll most likely find a reason to postpone the hearing. [42:01.020 --> 42:02.720] If they don't, you don't really care. [42:02.720 --> 42:08.980] If you have addressed all of the issues and laid the record, you really don't care what [42:08.980 --> 42:09.980] they do. [42:09.980 --> 42:14.980] So I sent you two emails, did you see both of them? [42:14.980 --> 42:19.500] I sent you one updating you on what happened this morning. [42:19.500 --> 42:20.500] I saw it. [42:20.500 --> 42:28.020] I've been out all day driving in, we had some really, this is Texas and we had this strange [42:28.020 --> 42:31.980] liquid substance falling out of the sky. [42:31.980 --> 42:35.100] Oh, it was horrible. [42:35.100 --> 42:37.620] Man, I've been driving in all day. [42:37.620 --> 42:39.420] So I didn't have time to read it. [42:39.420 --> 42:44.900] I saw it, but I didn't have time to read it. [42:44.900 --> 42:47.620] Okay, hang on. [42:47.620 --> 42:49.420] We'll pick this up on the other side. [42:49.420 --> 43:01.500] Randy Kelton, Bret Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this Friday, the 28th day of October 2022. [43:01.500 --> 43:04.140] We'll be right back. [43:04.140 --> 43:08.740] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [43:08.740 --> 43:10.180] of nutrition. [43:10.180 --> 43:14.900] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that. [43:14.900 --> 43:20.620] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [43:20.620 --> 43:26.940] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevity can [43:26.940 --> 43:29.380] provide the nutrients you need. [43:29.380 --> 43:34.140] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which [43:34.140 --> 43:35.140] we reject. [43:35.140 --> 43:40.380] We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with [43:40.380 --> 43:46.980] Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others, when you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your [43:46.980 --> 43:50.740] health will improve as you help support quality radio. [43:50.740 --> 43:55.180] As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us. [43:55.180 --> 44:00.780] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [44:00.780 --> 44:01.780] increase your income. [44:01.780 --> 44:02.780] Order now. [44:02.780 --> 44:07.780] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [44:07.780 --> 44:14.620] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course [44:14.620 --> 44:17.620] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [44:17.620 --> 44:22.380] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [44:22.380 --> 44:26.660] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [44:26.660 --> 44:31.500] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too. [44:31.500 --> 44:37.700] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [44:37.700 --> 44:42.780] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the [44:42.780 --> 44:47.100] principles and practices that control our American courts. [44:47.100 --> 44:53.140] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [44:53.140 --> 44:55.660] pro se tactics, and much more. [44:55.660 --> 45:18.620] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [45:18.620 --> 45:31.180] Thank you very much. [45:31.180 --> 46:00.820] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Bret Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. [46:00.820 --> 46:04.380] And we're talking to Jason in Wisconsin. [46:04.380 --> 46:05.980] Okay, go ahead, Jason. [46:05.980 --> 46:10.900] All right, I guess I'll start with what happened this morning. [46:10.900 --> 46:14.500] So I stayed up late last night working on some paperwork. [46:14.500 --> 46:22.980] I refiled my writ of mandamus along with a petition for waiver of fees. [46:22.980 --> 46:30.060] And I also filed a motion for adjournment in the speeding case where they only gave [46:30.060 --> 46:36.020] me like six days notice of the trial date asking for an adjournment so I would have [46:36.020 --> 46:40.100] time to seek legal representation. [46:40.100 --> 46:48.140] Both those were immediately denied as soon as the court basically opened this morning. [46:48.140 --> 46:56.340] And the motion for adjournment was denied with basically a one sentence denial. [46:56.340 --> 46:58.460] No reasons given for the denial? [46:58.460 --> 47:01.140] No reasons given. [47:01.140 --> 47:03.740] And didn't really even have a chance for anybody to oppose it. [47:03.740 --> 47:06.580] So technically it was unopposed, huh? [47:06.580 --> 47:10.540] Yeah, none of these have been opposed really that I filed. [47:10.540 --> 47:12.500] Actually, none of them have. [47:12.500 --> 47:20.460] But yeah, it simply said the court has considered your motion and it is denied. [47:20.460 --> 47:24.180] And that's all said. [47:24.180 --> 47:31.020] And then as far as my writ of mandamus, that's even worse because on the e-filing system, [47:31.020 --> 47:33.380] I can't even find a written denial for that. [47:33.380 --> 47:35.740] I called the clerk of court's office. [47:35.740 --> 47:39.980] They told me that the judge denied it and that he denied it because I didn't give my [47:39.980 --> 47:43.780] financial information. [47:43.780 --> 47:44.780] Wait a minute. [47:44.780 --> 47:46.260] Wait a minute. [47:46.260 --> 47:52.260] That violates your constitutional right to privacy. [47:52.260 --> 47:58.100] It also, I believe, violates another constitutional right that I filed my petition to waiver fees [47:58.100 --> 48:03.580] based on Article 1, Section 9 of the Wisconsin Constitution. [48:03.580 --> 48:08.980] I don't have it right in front of me, but it says something to the effect of you can't [48:08.980 --> 48:15.620] be forced to purchase remedy or something to that effect. [48:15.620 --> 48:20.820] Wait, say that again. [48:20.820 --> 48:27.980] Okay, I think you're saying the same thing I did in different words. [48:27.980 --> 48:40.540] You have a constitutional right to privacy of your property and your papers. [48:40.540 --> 48:49.420] And you cannot be compelled to give up one right in order to exercise or enjoy another. [48:49.420 --> 48:57.420] So your argument is that if you require me to give up my papers to you, then you're forcing [48:57.420 --> 49:01.860] me to give up one right in order to enjoy another. [49:01.860 --> 49:03.540] All right. [49:03.540 --> 49:08.060] Well, I found the section of the Constitution I'm referring to. [49:08.060 --> 49:09.060] I can read it too quick. [49:09.060 --> 49:11.940] It's only a couple of sentences. [49:11.940 --> 49:12.940] Every person... [49:12.940 --> 49:13.940] What's that? [49:13.940 --> 49:15.940] No, go ahead. [49:15.940 --> 49:17.740] All right. [49:17.740 --> 49:22.800] Every person is entitled to a certain remedy in the laws for all injuries or wrongs which [49:22.800 --> 49:27.420] he may receive in his person, property, or character. [49:27.420 --> 49:32.060] He ought to obtain justice freely and without being obliged to purchase it completely and [49:32.060 --> 49:37.340] without denial promptly and without delay conformably to the laws. [49:37.340 --> 49:44.900] So that's what I cited in my petition to waiver fees or waiver fees. [49:44.900 --> 49:47.540] I have a question. [49:47.540 --> 50:02.820] In Wisconsin, are the municipal and the class C type misdemeanor judges, can they be lawyers? [50:02.820 --> 50:09.860] I believe all of them are lawyers in the circuit court, at least in the state court level. [50:09.860 --> 50:13.420] Have you bargrieved them into the Stone Age? [50:13.420 --> 50:14.420] I have not. [50:14.420 --> 50:17.620] That's something I'm going to be working on this weekend along with... [50:17.620 --> 50:18.620] Okay, okay. [50:18.620 --> 50:20.860] Here's what I would like you to do. [50:20.860 --> 50:25.660] Take the phone and beat yourself around the eyes and the ears for being... [50:25.660 --> 50:26.660] What's the term, Brett? [50:26.660 --> 50:27.660] Lackadaisical. [50:27.660 --> 50:28.660] Yeah. [50:28.660 --> 50:34.660] I should probably beat myself for a few things here that I messed up on, but... [50:34.660 --> 50:39.740] Grieve them quick, grieve them often. [50:39.740 --> 50:44.140] They're going to try to screw you, let's see if we can't turn that around. [50:44.140 --> 50:49.900] We had someone from Wisconsin, Mark, but he hasn't called in a long time. [50:49.900 --> 50:53.820] He was really, really good at that. [50:53.820 --> 51:01.100] He was diligent in bar grieving the snot out of them. [51:01.100 --> 51:03.300] At the end of the day, these are human beings. [51:03.300 --> 51:09.500] When you start bar grieving them, you're going to damage their careers. [51:09.500 --> 51:11.860] You have to consider. [51:11.860 --> 51:20.860] You got this guy who's got a Juris Doctorate, and he's down here in the municipal courts [51:20.860 --> 51:22.820] grubbing for dollars. [51:22.820 --> 51:25.820] What does that mean? [51:25.820 --> 51:29.740] Means he's not sharp as knife in the door, because if he was, he'd be out there making [51:29.740 --> 51:32.860] the big bucks. [51:32.860 --> 51:38.140] But have you seen the program Better Call Saul? [51:38.140 --> 51:40.680] No. [51:40.680 --> 51:45.980] You should watch at least the first episode. [51:45.980 --> 51:53.060] It's this lawyer struggling to get clients so he can pay his bills. [51:53.060 --> 51:59.860] When you're in the municipal and JP courts, you got Saul. [51:59.860 --> 52:04.660] You got the guy who don't have the big clients with the big money. [52:04.660 --> 52:08.700] You get this guy down here who's not sharp as knife in the drawer, and he's grubbing [52:08.700 --> 52:09.700] for dollars. [52:09.700 --> 52:11.980] Otherwise, he wouldn't be here. [52:11.980 --> 52:12.980] Yeah. [52:12.980 --> 52:17.180] Sting him good. [52:17.180 --> 52:23.820] Bar grieve him a couple of times, and that'll give him apoplexy. [52:23.820 --> 52:24.820] Use all the tools you have. [52:24.820 --> 52:31.100] I was going to look into the judicial conduct complaints, too, and see if I could get him [52:31.100 --> 52:33.220] with anything on that. [52:33.220 --> 52:41.460] What this judge won't expect, since he's sitting as a judge and not as a lawyer, he won't expect [52:41.460 --> 52:44.900] you to bar grieve him. [52:44.900 --> 52:53.260] You get two bar grievances or three bar grievances on him, and no law firm on the planet will [52:53.260 --> 52:54.260] take him on. [52:54.260 --> 53:04.740] Something I should point out here, this judge is the highest circuit court judge in this [53:04.740 --> 53:05.740] county. [53:05.740 --> 53:11.900] In fact, I believe he was just appointed to a position over multiple circuit courts. [53:11.900 --> 53:16.540] For some reason, it seems he's taken a personal interest in my case because they had a court [53:16.540 --> 53:18.860] commissioner on my case at first. [53:18.860 --> 53:24.900] I called the clerk of courts today, and she confirmed that he's the sitting judge on both [53:24.900 --> 53:27.100] of my cases now. [53:27.100 --> 53:33.740] She said they have no records of the court commissioner originally being assigned to [53:33.740 --> 53:39.020] my case, even though his name is listed on my first trial notice, and they have no records [53:39.020 --> 53:41.740] of why the judge was replaced. [53:41.740 --> 53:45.940] These things just magically happen. [53:45.940 --> 53:54.780] You need to look and see how that happens, under what circumstances and by what procedure. [53:54.780 --> 53:56.580] This is law. [53:56.580 --> 53:57.580] Everything has prescriptions. [53:57.580 --> 53:58.580] Yeah. [53:58.580 --> 54:04.420] I thought the way I read it, I thought the clerk of courts is supposed to appoint a judge [54:04.420 --> 54:06.420] over cases. [54:06.420 --> 54:11.940] Oh, that is interesting. [54:11.940 --> 54:17.980] In fact, I was looking at the statute about getting your judge replaced, and it looks [54:17.980 --> 54:24.740] like I can actually get the judge replaced one time for basically no reason. [54:24.740 --> 54:29.220] It's up to the clerk to decide who replaces the judge. [54:29.220 --> 54:32.740] That's something else I was looking into here. [54:32.740 --> 54:34.500] That's consistent with most states. [54:34.500 --> 54:45.900] In Texas, I can't replace the trial judge, but if the trial judge stands down for some [54:45.900 --> 54:52.940] reason and a judge is appointed, I can strike the first judge without cause. [54:52.940 --> 55:00.340] Yeah, that's pretty much the same way the Wisconsin statute is worded. [55:00.340 --> 55:09.260] If the original judge in the case was a magistrate, or what was he? [55:09.260 --> 55:13.580] A commissioner, I think he called him. [55:13.580 --> 55:15.300] I missed that. [55:15.300 --> 55:17.300] I think he called him a commissioner. [55:17.300 --> 55:18.300] Commissioner. [55:18.300 --> 55:19.300] Okay. [55:19.300 --> 55:20.300] He was a commissioner. [55:20.300 --> 55:23.900] It says court commissioner on the trial notice. [55:23.900 --> 55:30.860] How does a court commissioner get replaced by a circuit court judge? [55:30.860 --> 55:36.060] Yeah, that's what I'm wondering. [55:36.060 --> 55:40.500] The clerk of court's office, the person I spoke with, couldn't give me any answers on [55:40.500 --> 55:41.500] that. [55:41.500 --> 55:45.660] In fact, I actually recorded the phone call, so I have that too. [55:45.660 --> 55:49.780] Get somebody, get your neighbor, brother-in-law, or somebody with a different name somewhere [55:49.780 --> 55:56.180] nearby you there to just make a records request and ask for the policies and procedures and [55:56.180 --> 56:01.540] memos and emails that are surrounding the process involved for that matter. [56:01.540 --> 56:02.540] Wait, wait, wait. [56:02.540 --> 56:07.540] I've got a better idea. [56:07.540 --> 56:14.940] Send the information of who these people are to Brett, and Brett will call them Monday [56:14.940 --> 56:24.020] from rule of law radio saying how you do a radio program on legal reform, and we're getting [56:24.020 --> 56:33.820] information that these courts are horribly corrupt, and you want this information so [56:33.820 --> 56:42.740] that you don't inadvertently say something that's inappropriate and ask them for it. [56:42.740 --> 56:49.420] Brett, if you haven't done that, you have missed the most fun about being a radio talk [56:49.420 --> 56:51.780] show host. [56:51.780 --> 56:53.700] I called Minnesota. [56:53.700 --> 56:56.260] This woman has got cancer. [56:56.260 --> 56:59.340] She's getting a divorce from her rich husband. [56:59.340 --> 57:02.300] Her lawyer withdrew. [57:02.300 --> 57:10.540] She's having to represent herself in court while she's under chemo treatment. [57:10.540 --> 57:16.780] I called down there and asked for the court coordinator, and I told him who I was, and [57:16.780 --> 57:23.300] I want to come down and do a 10-minute YouTube interview with the judge, because I understand [57:23.300 --> 57:29.220] that the judge is trying to murder this woman by forcing her to represent herself in court [57:29.220 --> 57:30.700] against her rich husband. [57:30.700 --> 57:33.540] She said, well, I don't think that's happening. [57:33.540 --> 57:34.540] I said, who cares? [57:34.540 --> 57:39.660] Man, this is going to make a great story. [57:39.660 --> 57:45.220] The next court date said the judge stormed into the courtroom, pointed at her, and said, [57:45.220 --> 57:50.020] 60-day continuous, and when you come back, have a larder, boom, and stormed out. [57:50.020 --> 57:51.020] Hang on. [57:51.020 --> 57:53.860] We'll be right back. [57:53.860 --> 57:58.020] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? [57:58.020 --> 58:03.180] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that [58:03.180 --> 58:04.540] can really help. [58:04.540 --> 58:08.980] The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available [58:08.980 --> 58:09.980] today. [58:09.980 --> 58:13.940] It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you [58:13.940 --> 58:17.060] to know God and to know the meaning of life. [58:17.060 --> 58:22.300] The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. [58:22.300 --> 58:26.580] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan [58:26.580 --> 58:31.500] of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church. [58:31.500 --> 58:36.500] To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian [58:36.500 --> 58:44.260] Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102. [58:44.260 --> 58:51.860] That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org. [58:51.860 --> 59:05.780] Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [59:05.780 --> 59:31.220] The [59:31.220 --> 59:37.300] protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy. [59:37.300 --> 59:42.420] It's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [59:42.420 --> 59:48.540] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. [59:48.540 --> 59:54.060] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers and find [59:54.060 --> 59:58.800] a third party there. He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. [59:58.800 --> 01:00:02.940] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment [01:00:02.940 --> 01:00:07.780] was designed to prevent. It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, [01:00:07.780 --> 01:00:12.580] a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. Third party? Third Amendment? Get [01:00:12.580 --> 01:00:16.940] it? So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell [01:00:16.940 --> 01:00:21.140] them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and re-read the Third Amendment. I'm [01:00:21.140 --> 01:00:36.340] Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. The Bill of Rights [01:00:36.340 --> 01:00:41.380] contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. They guarantee you the specific freedoms Americans [01:00:41.380 --> 01:00:45.620] should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll [01:00:45.620 --> 01:00:51.060] be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:51.060 --> 01:00:55.420] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back [01:00:55.420 --> 01:01:00.820] again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:01:00.820 --> 01:01:06.500] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, [01:01:06.500 --> 01:01:12.340] it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:01:12.340 --> 01:01:20.300] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage. [01:01:20.300 --> 01:01:25.660] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles. [01:01:25.660 --> 01:01:30.140] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable [01:01:30.140 --> 01:01:35.340] search and seizure. Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you? Get it? Unfortunately, [01:01:35.340 --> 01:01:40.140] the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security. Case in point, [01:01:40.140 --> 01:01:44.800] TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. When government employees demand [01:01:44.800 --> 01:01:49.420] a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional [01:01:49.420 --> 01:01:54.260] alarm bells. Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their [01:01:54.260 --> 01:01:59.220] googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and [01:01:59.220 --> 01:02:23.340] information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:02:29.220 --> 01:02:50.420] Okay, we are back. Vandy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rudelaw Radio on this, the 28th day of Octobobur, [01:02:50.420 --> 01:03:02.620] always double B that one, 2022. And we're talking to Jason in Wisconsin. And yeah, send [01:03:02.620 --> 01:03:12.180] me information on the court and I'll call down there and just jerk him around. [01:03:12.180 --> 01:03:15.180] Okay. [01:03:15.180 --> 01:03:18.260] I haven't done that in a long time and that is so much fun. [01:03:18.260 --> 01:03:23.540] What do you need? Just the name of the court or do you want a phone number or that type [01:03:23.540 --> 01:03:24.540] of stuff? [01:03:24.540 --> 01:03:31.340] Yeah, contact information, the name of the judge, name of the prosecutor. [01:03:31.340 --> 01:03:32.820] Okay. [01:03:32.820 --> 01:03:38.660] And then just give me an idea of what you think they're doing so I can make a bunch [01:03:38.660 --> 01:03:48.300] of false accusations. [01:03:48.300 --> 01:04:14.780] Yeah, I don't even want to go into the details because it could take up your whole show. [01:04:14.780 --> 01:04:35.340] That's enough. He's known for being highly corrupt. Oh, I could use that. [01:04:35.340 --> 01:04:42.980] Well, if that would be my situation and I got a trial coming up immediately, there's [01:04:42.980 --> 01:04:50.140] no time. You need to file a criminal complaint. And then that way you can, you've got cause [01:04:50.140 --> 01:04:57.020] to disqualify. I'm not saying you need to. That's what I would do. I would find any reason [01:04:57.020 --> 01:05:01.820] that's, I mean, you've got plenty of reason. You don't have to make anything up, but you [01:05:01.820 --> 01:05:07.500] know what he's done and find a crime that lines up with that. [01:05:07.500 --> 01:05:14.660] Alleged the crime, put it out there. And now he's in a situation where he needs to step [01:05:14.660 --> 01:05:18.140] down and not be the one presiding over your case. [01:05:18.140 --> 01:05:25.300] Okay. Does the judge have a bar card? [01:05:25.300 --> 01:05:31.900] I can't confirm for sure, but if I had, I guess I would say probably because I believe [01:05:31.900 --> 01:05:37.660] that according to state law, a circuit court judge has to be a lawyer. [01:05:37.660 --> 01:05:45.740] No, no, no. That's not how that works. They have to have been a lawyer, but once they [01:05:45.740 --> 01:05:52.980] become an elected superior court judge, you've got inferior and superior. Inferior is generally [01:05:52.980 --> 01:06:02.580] a municipal and JP, those judges that handle class C misdemeanors. Anything above that [01:06:02.580 --> 01:06:08.460] is a superior judge and they have to have a bar. They have to have had a bar card. They [01:06:08.460 --> 01:06:15.580] have to have been to law school, but generally when a judge is elected, they give up their [01:06:15.580 --> 01:06:22.760] bar card because they're not allowed to practice law while they're a judge, unless it's a class [01:06:22.760 --> 01:06:28.380] C misdemeanor court, like a JP and a municipal. [01:06:28.380 --> 01:06:42.860] So at that level, if he is a judge, he's almost certainly has a legal practice. Zap him. You [01:06:42.860 --> 01:06:47.660] get the third bar grievance on him and if he's with a law firm, they're going to toss [01:06:47.660 --> 01:06:57.500] him. I got a guy in San Marcos that bar grieved his attorney once. The lawyer, his attorney [01:06:57.500 --> 01:07:06.060] moved to withdraw and he bar grieved him for it. The judge denied it, wouldn't allow [01:07:06.060 --> 01:07:12.420] the lawyer to withdraw. After he wouldn't allow him to withdraw, he bar grieved the [01:07:12.420 --> 01:07:20.020] lawyer for filing his motion to withdraw and then he bar grieved him and then they filed [01:07:20.020 --> 01:07:25.840] another motion to withdraw and he comes to court and there's a different lawyer there. [01:07:25.840 --> 01:07:31.300] They said this lawyer no longer does criminal. He only does civil. Now I'm your lawyer and [01:07:31.300 --> 01:07:38.020] I told him, tell the guy, no, you're not. He's still my lawyer. They fired this guy [01:07:38.020 --> 01:07:49.540] because he got a bar grievance. You can big time hammer this judge's career as a lawyer, [01:07:49.540 --> 01:07:58.500] which he needs. So check, just run his name on the state bar association. What might be [01:07:58.500 --> 01:08:07.140] even better is there may be two guys with the same name. Bar grief the wrong one. That [01:08:07.140 --> 01:08:16.500] is so much fun. I did that in Fort Worth and sometimes you get serendipity. Turned out [01:08:16.500 --> 01:08:24.540] the wrong lawyer was a lawyer for a friend of mine and he mentioned my name and the lawyer [01:08:24.540 --> 01:08:31.100] freaked out. He bar grieved me and it wasn't even my client. It was another lawyer with [01:08:31.100 --> 01:08:37.860] the same name, but I kind of knew that because one lawyer was in Decatur where I'm at and [01:08:37.860 --> 01:08:42.740] another lawyer was in Fort Worth. So I said, which one is it? Oh, it must be the one in [01:08:42.740 --> 01:08:50.820] Fort Worth. So I bar grieved the one in Fort Worth. Robert told me about this. He mentioned [01:08:50.820 --> 01:08:55.980] my name and said this lawyer went off. So I called the lawyer and I told him, oh, Robert [01:08:55.980 --> 01:09:04.500] told me I bar grieved the wrong guy. Oh, I'm sorry. My bad. I'll notice the bar that that [01:09:04.500 --> 01:09:10.940] was found by mistake. And then I bar grieved the other guy and the lawyer said, no, no, [01:09:10.940 --> 01:09:22.620] don't do that. I get tickled every time I think about it. That was so rotten. Just think [01:09:22.620 --> 01:09:30.100] if this guy has a bar card and that's another lawyer with the same name and you bar grieved [01:09:30.100 --> 01:09:36.660] the other lawyer for what this guy did. Oh, it's glorious. Jason, you want to mention [01:09:36.660 --> 01:09:42.260] that guy's name here? We don't mind mentioning a bad guy's names on the air. If you want [01:09:42.260 --> 01:09:51.300] to tell me, I'll just look it up right now. The judge's name? Yes. His name is Guy Dutcher. [01:09:51.300 --> 01:10:01.860] Guy Dutcher. One thing about being in public service, when you're in public service, you [01:10:01.860 --> 01:10:12.180] are in the public and you have no expectation of privacy. But I'll need to call him and [01:10:12.180 --> 01:10:18.100] say, well, I can't say bad things about you on the air without giving you opportunity [01:10:18.100 --> 01:10:27.140] to rebut. So I want a 10 minute interview. I have never got one of those interviews. [01:10:27.140 --> 01:10:35.820] Yeah, here he is. He does have a live card. It says license status, good standing. We'll [01:10:35.820 --> 01:10:46.860] see if we can do something about that. Member ID 1011762. That's his bar number. You can [01:10:46.860 --> 01:10:54.380] find more than one by that name. No, that's a pretty unique name. Oh, that'll ruin a lot [01:10:54.380 --> 01:11:02.520] of fun. Well, let's see here. Let's see if we can find some other similar name. Maybe [01:11:02.520 --> 01:11:12.900] one with just an initial. Well, it's easier in Texas because we've got 900,000 lawyers. [01:11:12.900 --> 01:11:20.020] I'm sorry, 90,000 lawyers. Hey, if you just use the last name, there's a couple other [01:11:20.020 --> 01:11:31.620] ones. There's a Clay Dutcher and a Howard Dutcher. So Bargreeve is the wrong one. And [01:11:31.620 --> 01:11:39.020] then apologize and Bargreeve is the right one. And tell the wrong one, oh, my bad, I [01:11:39.020 --> 01:11:46.740] didn't have to Bargreeve this guy. Or just tell the wrong guy, my bad. Oh, but now that [01:11:46.740 --> 01:11:50.820] you have all that information in front of you, now you're required to Bargreeve him. [01:11:50.820 --> 01:12:00.220] So you Bargreeve the right guy and I won't have to. This is, you know, they use every [01:12:00.220 --> 01:12:09.500] dirty, rotten, low down trick they can against you. It's time we return the favor. Yeah, [01:12:09.500 --> 01:12:18.460] I agree. But since he has a bar card, just line out all the things he's did, he's done [01:12:18.460 --> 01:12:26.020] and start Bargreeving him once every week or every two weeks. Okay, I'm definitely going [01:12:26.020 --> 01:12:31.860] to do that. And I definitely have a bunch of other stuff I'm going to do. But the issue [01:12:31.860 --> 01:12:37.580] is my time is short here, as I'm sure you understand. Yes. You know, Monday is my last [01:12:37.580 --> 01:12:46.980] day I can take any action before this trial here. So I guess my main concern is if this [01:12:46.980 --> 01:12:51.300] if they end up totally railroading everything I do on Monday and I end up having to go to [01:12:51.300 --> 01:13:03.540] trial, what do I do then? Once you Barg, okay, don't worry about trial. Your only purpose [01:13:03.540 --> 01:13:10.020] in trial court is to set the record for appeal. They're going to expect them to rule against [01:13:10.020 --> 01:13:16.940] you out of hand at every turn. Who cares? It's all right. They usually do. You're just [01:13:16.940 --> 01:13:23.460] you're just there to set the record. Once they have made their ruling, then your turn [01:13:23.460 --> 01:13:32.700] starts. Now we got all kinds of things you can do to them. Once the judge has rendered [01:13:32.700 --> 01:13:40.900] his bogus ruling. One of the things you can do is start doing a little research. How many [01:13:40.900 --> 01:13:57.420] people in that court have been found not guilty? Any? Okay, in Texas, 77.3% of all people who [01:13:57.420 --> 01:14:09.060] get a ticket just send in a check. That means 27% don't. Of those 27%, they are all ordered [01:14:09.060 --> 01:14:17.740] to come to court and meet with a prosecutor who then offers this them this incredible [01:14:17.740 --> 01:14:29.700] deal. 99% take the deal. Everybody takes the deal. These guys can pretty much do anything [01:14:29.700 --> 01:14:39.940] they want to with no concern for retribution or retaliation. No consequences to them. Somebody [01:14:39.940 --> 01:14:46.620] needs to deliver consequences. And bar grieving the lawyers, the prosecutor, if there's a [01:14:46.620 --> 01:14:52.740] prosecutor in a low level court like this, the prosecutor almost certainly has a day [01:14:52.740 --> 01:15:00.460] job as a lawyer somewhere. Actually, this district attorney was elected, so I'm not [01:15:00.460 --> 01:15:09.140] sure about that. Oh, is the person standing in your case an elected district attorney [01:15:09.140 --> 01:15:14.780] or an assistant? He's the actual district attorney. He doesn't have any assistance [01:15:14.780 --> 01:15:23.300] right now, actually. Oh, he has open positions for assistance. He used to have one but apparently [01:15:23.300 --> 01:15:33.660] now he has no assistance. Oh, good, then give him a lot of work to do. Bar grieving, he's [01:15:33.660 --> 01:15:41.220] going to have to answer the grievance. He filed any criminal charges against him. Not [01:15:41.220 --> 01:15:45.340] yet. It's something I'm going to be looking into this weekend. That should be about the [01:15:45.340 --> 01:15:52.700] first thing you do. He wants to take it to you. Take it right back to him. You want to [01:15:52.700 --> 01:15:58.660] fight, Bubba? I'll give you one. Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law [01:15:58.660 --> 01:16:06.940] Radio. We'll be right back. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, [01:16:06.940 --> 01:16:12.620] letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [01:16:12.620 --> 01:16:16.940] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you [01:16:16.940 --> 01:16:22.340] can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using [01:16:22.340 --> 01:16:28.100] federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, [01:16:28.100 --> 01:16:31.940] how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit [01:16:31.940 --> 01:16:37.380] report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The [01:16:37.380 --> 01:16:42.460] Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal [01:16:42.460 --> 01:16:47.900] consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com [01:16:47.900 --> 01:16:53.180] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's [01:16:53.180 --> 01:17:02.700] ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors [01:17:02.700 --> 01:17:08.140] now. I love Logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [01:17:08.140 --> 01:17:12.460] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fix. I'd be [01:17:12.460 --> 01:17:17.380] lost without Logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to [01:17:17.380 --> 01:17:21.220] volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money [01:17:21.220 --> 01:17:27.620] to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help Logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. [01:17:27.620 --> 01:17:31.900] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos. You can order new supplies [01:17:31.900 --> 01:17:37.580] or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to logosradio.network.com. [01:17:37.580 --> 01:17:43.620] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon, [01:17:43.620 --> 01:17:49.380] you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do anything [01:17:49.380 --> 01:17:55.940] different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving without [01:17:55.940 --> 01:18:02.100] doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are welcome. [01:18:02.100 --> 01:18:21.580] Happy holidays, Logos. This is the Logos Radio Network. [01:18:21.580 --> 01:18:46.780] Okay. We are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue of La Radio and we're talking to Jason [01:18:46.780 --> 01:18:58.720] in Wisconsin. Okay, Jason. Tuesday, you have a hearing. Yeah. What motions or pleadings [01:18:58.720 --> 01:19:08.380] do you have before the court? Only the ones that were denied this morning. I have a list [01:19:08.380 --> 01:19:13.100] of motions that I'm going to be working on this weekend and getting filed first thing [01:19:13.100 --> 01:19:23.140] Monday morning. Okay, hold on, hold on. Were any of those motions dispositive in that they [01:19:23.140 --> 01:19:33.300] would dispose of the case? No, I don't believe so. I really only had a motion for adjournment, [01:19:33.300 --> 01:19:43.220] a few of those, and then the mandamus I filed. This doesn't make sense. You file a mandamus [01:19:43.220 --> 01:19:50.820] in the trial court? No, a circuit court. The circuit court is what they call the lowest [01:19:50.820 --> 01:19:57.580] level state court in Wisconsin. No, no. A mandamus is almost always filed with an appellate [01:19:57.580 --> 01:20:04.260] court. Well, I filed it with the appellate court a few days ago and they dismissed it [01:20:04.260 --> 01:20:10.180] and in the dismissal letter, the judge seemed to be giving me some advice on how to properly [01:20:10.180 --> 01:20:14.820] file it. He basically said, I believe the petitioner meant to file this in the circuit [01:20:14.820 --> 01:20:30.940] court. Did he give any case law or statutory law supporting that? No. Okay. That sounds [01:20:30.940 --> 01:20:36.700] like to me, Randy, that sounds like the appellate court guy didn't want to touch it. He wanted [01:20:36.700 --> 01:20:43.060] it to be a, it was like a hot potato and he didn't want to deal with it. So he had a pro [01:20:43.060 --> 01:20:49.900] se litigant and he figured he could snooker him. Right. That's what it looks like to me. [01:20:49.900 --> 01:21:00.420] Look up in Wisconsin, to whom does a writ of mandamus get, with whom does it get filed? [01:21:00.420 --> 01:21:04.740] See if you can find that. I already spent quite a bit of time in trying to figure that [01:21:04.740 --> 01:21:13.500] out and I found one statute that seemed to suggest that it goes to the appeals or Supreme [01:21:13.500 --> 01:21:18.980] court. And in fact, I even called the, the clerk of courts for the appeals court and [01:21:18.980 --> 01:21:27.780] asked them on, I think it was on Monday and they, it gets filed. Yeah. I know they, but [01:21:27.780 --> 01:21:32.900] what they told me was I should file it with the appeals court or if I believe I have reason [01:21:32.900 --> 01:21:41.300] to file the Supreme court, but that's not. Yeah. This, you file a ruling by the appeals [01:21:41.300 --> 01:21:48.780] court to the Supreme. You file a ruling generally by the trial court with the court of appeals, [01:21:48.780 --> 01:21:57.580] but you really need to look at the criminal procedure code for mandamus. Yeah. That's [01:21:57.580 --> 01:22:01.940] where I was looking and it had that one section of the statute that, like I said, seemed to [01:22:01.940 --> 01:22:08.260] imply that it goes to the appeals or Supreme court. I don't have the wording of it in front [01:22:08.260 --> 01:22:22.780] of me, but it wasn't 100% clear to me what exactly it meant. Okay. It's hard to address [01:22:22.780 --> 01:22:32.660] that from here without the code. Yeah. Looking through the code right now. Look for a way [01:22:32.660 --> 01:22:37.740] to push it out of this court into a higher court. And then you hammer the higher court [01:22:37.740 --> 01:22:43.140] if you don't feel like they did it right. So what I'm wondering is since the circuit [01:22:43.140 --> 01:22:51.580] court denied it, does that then give me grounds to file it with the appeals court? Oh, absolutely. [01:22:51.580 --> 01:22:58.020] Who is the next highest court? That would be the appeals court. Then absolutely file [01:22:58.020 --> 01:23:05.860] it with the appeals court and ask for an abatement of the current proceedings until this issue [01:23:05.860 --> 01:23:11.340] can be addressed. Okay. That's what I was looking for. If I could find some way to get [01:23:11.340 --> 01:23:18.460] the appeals court intervene in my trial here, that might be. Generally, if you file with [01:23:18.460 --> 01:23:25.380] the appeals court and ask for a stay, they'll almost always grant that until they've had [01:23:25.380 --> 01:23:30.180] time to read through your pleading. Whether they agree with your pleading or not, they're [01:23:30.180 --> 01:23:39.060] going to need time to read it. So that's likely to get you the emergency stay. Okay. Yeah. [01:23:39.060 --> 01:23:43.220] That's kind of one of the things I was looking for here. Like I said, if I could figure out [01:23:43.220 --> 01:23:53.100] a way to get the appeals court to step in this here and delay things for me. Okay. That's [01:23:53.100 --> 01:24:01.540] what I suggest. So assuming worst case, none of this stuff works and I end up having to [01:24:01.540 --> 01:24:08.980] go to court on Tuesday, what exactly do I do? I'm guessing there's going to be some [01:24:08.980 --> 01:24:14.820] motions I'm going to present. And then what if they just totally railroad those and force [01:24:14.820 --> 01:24:23.620] me to go to the mayor? Okay. You do not care what the trial court does. Your only purpose [01:24:23.620 --> 01:24:31.940] in the trial court is to set the record for appeal. Let him rule any way he wants to. [01:24:31.940 --> 01:24:38.300] And when you're doing that, they will kind of get the idea. How long has it been since [01:24:38.300 --> 01:24:48.620] the time you were issued a citation? The first citation I was issued June 1st, the speeding [01:24:48.620 --> 01:24:58.820] citation that was converted from- Wait, June 1st this year? Yeah. What does your constitution [01:24:58.820 --> 01:25:08.660] say about what constitutes a speedy trial? That I'm not sure about. The reason it's [01:25:08.660 --> 01:25:13.340] taken so long though is because I asked for an adjournment and they granted me my first [01:25:13.340 --> 01:25:23.500] one. So they haven't delayed this? They haven't delayed it at all. In fact, they've [01:25:23.500 --> 01:25:32.500] just been trying to do the opposite and trying to force it through as quick as they can. [01:25:32.500 --> 01:25:41.900] Okay. You're not giving me a whole lot to beat him up with. Yeah. When we ask for a [01:25:41.900 --> 01:25:46.860] delay, then we lose our chance to complain about delay and try to raise a stink about [01:25:46.860 --> 01:25:54.460] speedy trial and we can't complain. Okay. That's not exactly true. You only cannot complain [01:25:54.460 --> 01:26:04.300] about the delay that you caused. Yeah. You're asking for a delay does not in any way alleviate [01:26:04.300 --> 01:26:10.420] the other side. Let's say you have a 60-day statute of limitations or a 60-day window [01:26:10.420 --> 01:26:18.100] for them to prosecute you and you asked for a 30-day stay. Well, the clock on their speedy [01:26:18.100 --> 01:26:27.740] trial, their speedy trial clock stops for 30 days and then it starts again. So their [01:26:27.740 --> 01:26:36.860] time is not extended anything beyond the delay you caused. Does that make sense? Yeah. Okay. [01:26:36.860 --> 01:26:45.620] Maybe that's something I'll have to look into. What did you do to delay the trial? Well, [01:26:45.620 --> 01:26:53.420] I filed a motion for adjournment because back in August I had surgery and I was having health [01:26:53.420 --> 01:26:57.980] issues and couldn't even go to work for a few weeks. So I kind of used that as my justification [01:26:57.980 --> 01:27:05.180] and I asked for 90 days. They gave me 45 days. Then after that, I tried for another motion [01:27:05.180 --> 01:27:11.180] for adjournment. That's denied and each one since then has been denied. Okay. That's kind [01:27:11.180 --> 01:27:21.500] of standard. They're going to say that for a minor infraction of this nature, the delay [01:27:21.500 --> 01:27:30.620] is not warranted. Is there a delay on their part? It doesn't seem that there is any delay [01:27:30.620 --> 01:27:38.220] on their part. Okay. That may not be an issue that we have then. Yeah. Like I said, it seems [01:27:38.220 --> 01:27:43.620] the opposite. Like they're trying to force us through as quick as they can. That's the [01:27:43.620 --> 01:27:50.940] only reason I could think of that they would give me a trial notice for my speeding citation [01:27:50.940 --> 01:28:00.900] of less than seven days before the actual trial date. Okay. I'm trying to think of how [01:28:00.900 --> 01:28:07.420] you can effectively stave this off, but it may not matter if you do stave it off or not [01:28:07.420 --> 01:28:11.780] because no matter if they don't give you everything you want, you're going to file a notice of [01:28:11.780 --> 01:28:20.060] intent to appeal. And your only real purpose in the trial court, if you've prepared all [01:28:20.060 --> 01:28:26.820] your pleading motions and pleadings, the trial court gets them before the court. Then all [01:28:26.820 --> 01:28:38.460] subsequent courts have to consider them. So my question is, I guess... Oh, I hear the [01:28:38.460 --> 01:28:46.380] music here. My question is, after I do my motions and pleadings, if they deny and railroad [01:28:46.380 --> 01:28:53.700] me on all of it, then they try to force into the merits. What do I say about that? Okay. [01:28:53.700 --> 01:28:58.140] Let's talk about that on the other side. One of the things you have to do is bring questions [01:28:58.140 --> 01:29:05.380] before the court that they don't want to have to answer. Hang on, Randy Calton, Brett Fountain. [01:29:05.380 --> 01:29:10.940] Sorry, soft drink lovers. Even diet drinks can make you fat. A new study shows that diet [01:29:10.940 --> 01:29:15.940] soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht [01:29:15.940 --> 01:29:21.500] and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas. Privacy is under [01:29:21.500 --> 01:29:26.380] attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your [01:29:26.380 --> 01:29:31.500] privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your [01:29:31.500 --> 01:29:37.340] rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth [01:29:37.340 --> 01:29:42.620] hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private [01:29:42.620 --> 01:29:49.940] search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. [01:29:49.940 --> 01:29:54.940] Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? Wrong. Researchers [01:29:54.940 --> 01:29:59.940] at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade. They found [01:29:59.940 --> 01:30:04.980] that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no [01:30:04.980 --> 01:30:10.180] soda at all. The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike [01:30:10.180 --> 01:30:15.340] regular sugars don't deliver anything to squelch it. Waking up hunger without satisfying it [01:30:15.340 --> 01:30:21.040] leads to cravings, which can result in a larger overall calorie intake. So use natural sweeteners [01:30:21.040 --> 01:30:25.100] to maintain a healthy weight, and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff [01:30:25.100 --> 01:30:30.540] altogether and drink water instead. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information [01:30:30.540 --> 01:30:38.060] at CatherineAlbrecht.com. This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the [01:30:38.060 --> 01:30:43.060] afternoon of September 11. The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 [01:30:43.060 --> 01:30:47.340] architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of [01:30:47.340 --> 01:30:51.460] my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow first responders [01:30:51.460 --> 01:30:54.820] are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York [01:30:54.820 --> 01:30:59.660] City correctional. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, [01:30:59.660 --> 01:31:07.100] and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer [01:31:07.100 --> 01:31:10.820] the Rule of Law traffic seminar. In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, [01:31:10.820 --> 01:31:14.180] and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to [01:31:14.180 --> 01:31:18.180] stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to travel freely from [01:31:18.180 --> 01:31:21.740] place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the [01:31:21.740 --> 01:31:25.660] right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity [01:31:25.660 --> 01:31:30.020] to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy [01:31:30.020 --> 01:31:33.620] Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive [01:31:33.620 --> 01:31:37.260] teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to [01:31:37.260 --> 01:31:40.900] hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material [01:31:40.900 --> 01:31:45.260] by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive [01:31:45.260 --> 01:31:49.420] a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio [01:31:49.420 --> 01:31:53.580] of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource [01:31:53.580 --> 01:31:58.300] material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [01:31:58.300 --> 01:32:05.300] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:32:29.300 --> 01:32:36.300] The wicked come with temptations. They're trying to buy the whole place. They wanna [01:32:36.300 --> 01:32:43.300] force a new nation. Because they've fallen from grace. I will not drink from that cup. [01:32:43.300 --> 01:32:50.300] I just can't act that way. Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law [01:33:13.420 --> 01:33:19.420] Radio, and we're talking to Jason in Wisconsin. And Jason, you were gonna open up a can of [01:33:19.420 --> 01:33:26.420] worms. Yeah, I hope so. So yeah, when we were going to the break, I was kind of asking you [01:33:28.420 --> 01:33:35.420] about if I go to court and I get through all my motions and they do whatever they're gonna [01:33:37.180 --> 01:33:41.500] do with them and then they wanna actually have a trial on the merits, what do I say [01:33:41.500 --> 01:33:48.500] and do at that point? Ask for a continuance so that you can seek your counsel. Okay. They [01:33:51.580 --> 01:33:58.580] want you to have counsel because they can deal with counsel. Well, my motion for adjournment [01:33:59.620 --> 01:34:06.340] I filed today stated the fact that I needed an adjournment to seek legal representation. [01:34:06.340 --> 01:34:13.340] So I kind of already tried that. And they denied it? Denied? Getting counsel? Yep, denied [01:34:15.420 --> 01:34:22.420] with all reason. Needs a request for findings of fact and conclusions at law. The court [01:34:22.420 --> 01:34:29.420] will ignore that. This certainly needs a bar grievance or two or three. A bar grievance [01:34:32.340 --> 01:34:37.340] Monday. I'm telling you, that's just... And send him a copy of it, even though, because [01:34:37.340 --> 01:34:43.340] usually you don't have to send a copy to the lawyer. But in this case, you want him to [01:34:43.340 --> 01:34:50.340] find out as soon as possible. Yeah. But the real thing is, don't worry about the trial. [01:34:57.100 --> 01:35:02.100] The more you can get them to screw up, the better because the real fight starts when [01:35:02.100 --> 01:35:09.100] you go to appeal. And if they rule against you, just give them notice. You can give them [01:35:09.100 --> 01:35:15.500] verbal notice of your intent to appeal. Follow that up with a notice to the court. I hereby [01:35:15.500 --> 01:35:22.500] give notice of my intent to appeal. I then file informer or paupress, ask them to appoint [01:35:22.500 --> 01:35:29.500] counsel. This is when it just really starts getting interesting. Okay. So basically, I [01:35:29.500 --> 01:35:36.500] have... After I go through my motions and stuff, I basically just don't even say anything [01:35:43.940 --> 01:35:48.540] and let them do whatever they're going to do at that point or... Well, object to everything. [01:35:48.540 --> 01:35:53.340] That's... Yeah. That you can do. And being as annoying as possible. But they're going [01:35:53.340 --> 01:35:57.340] to rule against you out of hand at every turn. That's what they do. You could start out with [01:35:57.340 --> 01:36:04.340] a motion for judicial disqualification, for bias. Okay. Then you look at the records, [01:36:08.980 --> 01:36:15.980] see if any cases have been dismissed by this judge. I seem to have the most influence when [01:36:15.980 --> 01:36:22.980] I go in digging in their records. They hate to show you their records. What I like to [01:36:27.740 --> 01:36:34.740] do is go to the clerk and ask the clerk for a complete list of all indexes or reports [01:36:34.740 --> 01:36:41.740] or synopses that are required to be provided to other agencies within the government. This [01:36:48.660 --> 01:36:55.660] goes to my substantive scope and content recovery... Recovery. I'm sorry. Scope and content request. [01:36:55.660 --> 01:37:02.660] In your open records law, there's going to be a section that lists those items that are [01:37:09.540 --> 01:37:16.540] specifically made open for public inspection. Ask to see all those. Ask to see the names [01:37:16.540 --> 01:37:23.540] of all documents collected or symbol maintained by the department. How they're stored. How [01:37:26.980 --> 01:37:33.980] to request them. Send me an email and ask me for my scope and content request. My scope [01:37:33.980 --> 01:37:40.980] and content request was taken right out of the Texas Open Records Act. The Act says that [01:37:41.780 --> 01:37:47.780] these records are specifically made open for inspection. It has a whole list of them. I [01:37:47.780 --> 01:37:54.780] took that list and put it into an information request. I want to see all these records and [01:37:54.820 --> 01:37:59.820] I've had a list of them. I've had a list of them. I've had a list of them. I've had [01:37:59.820 --> 01:38:06.580] a list of them. I want to see all these records and I've had them say, well, we're not sure [01:38:06.580 --> 01:38:13.580] what you're asking. I had one in Georgetown, Texas, Williamson County, Texas. A young prosecutor [01:38:17.380 --> 01:38:22.020] came out and said, Mr. Kelton, I read your request and I'm not sure what you're asking [01:38:22.020 --> 01:38:27.380] for. I said, well, contact the legislature. They're the ones that wrote the code. I just [01:38:27.380 --> 01:38:34.380] quoted it. You know what to do. Here you're not asking for the content of any particular [01:38:38.220 --> 01:38:45.220] record. This is a request that they cannot claim that they don't understand what you're [01:38:48.060 --> 01:38:54.580] asking for. When they tell me that, well, just go read what the legislature said. I [01:38:54.580 --> 01:38:59.580] didn't write it. They did. You figure out what they're talking about. They asked me [01:38:59.580 --> 01:39:06.580] to narrow my scope. Sure, I can narrow my scope. All I want to see is precisely what [01:39:07.660 --> 01:39:14.660] I asked for. Put on the dime. Make them tell you every record they got. Then look at those [01:39:16.820 --> 01:39:22.740] records and then see which ones you want to pull. They want to be difficult with you, [01:39:22.740 --> 01:39:29.740] be difficult back. You'll be surprised what you find in there. When I did that to my local [01:39:30.180 --> 01:39:37.180] sheriff, I found the documents I was looking for. Someone had called me from the jail and [01:39:39.420 --> 01:39:45.620] told me they were doing shenanigans and I found the documentation to prove it. You're [01:39:45.620 --> 01:39:52.620] concerned about the trial. Here's the deal. You are not going to win this trial. Forget [01:39:53.180 --> 01:40:00.180] that. Yeah, I understand that already. Just set the record. Set the record. That's all [01:40:04.060 --> 01:40:10.140] you can do. Once you have the record set, then once they make their ruling, then you're [01:40:10.140 --> 01:40:17.140] out of their court going other places hammering them. Any place where they have taken an action [01:40:20.020 --> 01:40:26.780] that you can construe as exceeding their authority or failing to perform a duty they're required [01:40:26.780 --> 01:40:33.780] to perform and that excess of action or failure to act had the effect of denying you in the [01:40:33.780 --> 01:40:40.780] full and free access to or enjoyment of right, charge them criminally. You charge them criminally [01:40:41.140 --> 01:40:45.660] that the district attorney and the judges are going to try to protect them. Then you [01:40:45.660 --> 01:40:52.660] go after the judges. When you're going after them, it's a whole other animal. Eventually, [01:40:52.660 --> 01:40:59.660] what they're likely to do is like someone I have been helping, ask her to send him a [01:41:04.060 --> 01:41:11.060] note from a doctor saying that she could not wear masks and he had dropped the case. She [01:41:11.060 --> 01:41:17.100] and her husband said, this case is not about masks. I know, but I was just trying to help [01:41:17.100 --> 01:41:22.700] you out. She beat him up enough. The prosecutor was begging her for a way to make this case [01:41:22.700 --> 01:41:29.700] go away. Go pull out all your dirty tricks. I forgot to tell you about this mandamus. [01:41:34.340 --> 01:41:40.460] I'm filing it against the district attorney and the day I filed it in the appeals court, [01:41:40.460 --> 01:41:45.380] I got an email from the district attorney pretty much complaining about me filing it [01:41:45.380 --> 01:41:51.140] and saying that I had no grounds to file it, blah, blah, blah, whatever. The funny thing [01:41:51.140 --> 01:41:57.700] is I had sent three separate emails to this same email address addressing other issues [01:41:57.700 --> 01:42:01.900] in the past and he never once replied to me. All of a sudden, the day that I filed that [01:42:01.900 --> 01:42:08.900] mandamus, I got an email from him right away. Bubba, you should not play poker. From the [01:42:08.900 --> 01:42:15.900] wording of his email, I don't think he knows how to read statutes. Let's just put it that [01:42:17.900 --> 01:42:24.900] way. You don't want to think that. You don't want to think that a lawyer doesn't know how [01:42:26.300 --> 01:42:33.300] to read law. Or that he doesn't bother to read them. Let's put it that way. He probably [01:42:33.300 --> 01:42:40.300] knows how to read them. It might be both. That goes in your favor because you do know [01:42:41.300 --> 01:42:48.300] how. Okay, we need to move on, Jason. Do you have any other questions for the other side? [01:42:48.300 --> 01:42:54.260] Yeah, a couple things real quick. I'll make it quick on the other side. Okay, hang on, [01:42:54.260 --> 01:43:01.260] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back. Through advances in technology, our [01:43:05.860 --> 01:43:10.980] lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. People feed their pets [01:43:10.980 --> 01:43:16.060] better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense [01:43:16.060 --> 01:43:22.140] against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. In a world where natural [01:43:22.140 --> 01:43:28.100] foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients [01:43:28.100 --> 01:43:33.900] you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of [01:43:33.900 --> 01:43:39.900] which we reject. We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor [01:43:39.900 --> 01:43:45.900] along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from logosradionetwork.com, [01:43:45.900 --> 01:43:52.500] your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits [01:43:52.500 --> 01:43:57.900] of young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved [01:43:57.900 --> 01:44:04.900] health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now. Are you the [01:44:05.060 --> 01:44:11.060] plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, [01:44:11.060 --> 01:44:17.060] the affordable, easy to understand, poor CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, [01:44:17.060 --> 01:44:23.060] step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't [01:44:23.060 --> 01:44:28.060] have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step [01:44:28.060 --> 01:44:34.060] by step course and now you can too. Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney [01:44:34.060 --> 01:44:40.060] with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can [01:44:40.060 --> 01:44:45.060] learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control [01:44:45.060 --> 01:44:51.060] our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms [01:44:51.060 --> 01:44:58.060] for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and [01:44:58.060 --> 01:45:11.060] click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:45:28.060 --> 01:45:43.060] Okay, we are back. Brent Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this Friday, the 28th [01:45:43.060 --> 01:45:51.060] day of October 2022 and we're talking to Jason in Wisconsin. Okay, Jason, you had a couple [01:45:51.060 --> 01:45:52.060] more questions. [01:45:52.060 --> 01:45:57.060] Yeah, I just wanted to quickly run through. I have a list of motions I was going to work [01:45:57.060 --> 01:46:02.060] on this weekend and get filed Monday. I wanted to see what you thought of it here. So the [01:46:02.060 --> 01:46:07.060] first one will be a motion to dismiss. I was probably going to go to subject matter jurisdiction, [01:46:07.060 --> 01:46:14.060] maybe personal jurisdiction on that one. I was thinking about doing a motion to, I don't [01:46:14.060 --> 01:46:18.060] know exactly what it's called, but a motion to replace the judge, figure out how I can [01:46:18.060 --> 01:46:28.060] do that possibly. Judicial conduct complaints possibly. Then I was going to, like we were [01:46:28.060 --> 01:46:36.060] talking about, file the mandamus and the appeals court along with a motion to stay. That's [01:46:36.060 --> 01:46:41.060] about all I got on my list here. I'm sure I can think of a few more. [01:46:41.060 --> 01:46:50.060] We have an issue. If you have a hearing coming up in a couple of days, you may not be able [01:46:50.060 --> 01:46:59.060] to file any motions that will be ripe for hearing at this time. What is your requirement [01:46:59.060 --> 01:47:03.060] for notice to opposing parties when you file a motion? [01:47:03.060 --> 01:47:07.060] I'm not sure of all of it. [01:47:07.060 --> 01:47:10.060] It's generally seven to 10 days. [01:47:10.060 --> 01:47:15.060] But I think they automatically get noticed because I'm e-filing and it automatically [01:47:15.060 --> 01:47:17.060] gets sent to them. [01:47:17.060 --> 01:47:21.060] Have you filed any of these? [01:47:21.060 --> 01:47:25.060] No, I haven't filed any of the things I listed off yet. [01:47:25.060 --> 01:47:29.060] The point I'm making is it may be too late to file anything for the purpose of this hearing [01:47:29.060 --> 01:47:39.060] other than a subject matter jurisdiction challenge. And that is a very good thing to file because [01:47:39.060 --> 01:47:43.060] it's threshold. They have to address it first. [01:47:43.060 --> 01:47:47.060] That's probably the most important thing I was going to be working on this weekend. [01:47:47.060 --> 01:47:54.060] Okay. Then if they deny it, did you notice the court of your intent to file a petition [01:47:54.060 --> 01:48:02.060] for interlocutory appeal and ask for a stay of proceedings until that appeal can be heard? [01:48:02.060 --> 01:48:06.060] That should get the brakes on it. [01:48:06.060 --> 01:48:12.060] Okay. [01:48:12.060 --> 01:48:16.060] Yeah, so I think that's pretty much all I got here. [01:48:16.060 --> 01:48:22.060] Would you mind if I drafted up some of these motions, if I email them to you to have you review them [01:48:22.060 --> 01:48:25.060] maybe on Sunday or something? [01:48:25.060 --> 01:48:29.060] Yes, that'll work. [01:48:29.060 --> 01:48:35.060] Okay. Yeah, I'll go ahead and get these done tomorrow and get them emailed to you and see what you think. [01:48:35.060 --> 01:48:38.060] Okay. [01:48:38.060 --> 01:48:41.060] Okay. Thank you, Jason. [01:48:41.060 --> 01:48:47.060] One more thing. I wouldn't object to you giving the judge a call on Monday like you were talking about either. [01:48:47.060 --> 01:48:51.060] Yeah. See me some juicy stuff I can throw at him. [01:48:51.060 --> 01:48:56.060] It doesn't all need to be true. It just in you windows plenty. [01:48:56.060 --> 01:49:00.060] I'll send you an email explaining more about what he did to my neighbor who, by the way, [01:49:00.060 --> 01:49:05.060] is a 70-year-old military veteran if you want to throw that in when you call him. [01:49:05.060 --> 01:49:12.060] That'll work because I can be an indignant, disgruntled vet. [01:49:12.060 --> 01:49:16.060] Wait a minute. I am an indignant, disgruntled vet. [01:49:16.060 --> 01:49:24.060] I'm probably the most disgruntled vet you'll ever come across. [01:49:24.060 --> 01:49:32.060] Okay. Send that to me and I will call down there and have a little fun and games. [01:49:32.060 --> 01:49:35.060] All right. Sounds good. I appreciate the help. [01:49:35.060 --> 01:49:40.060] Okay. Thank you, Jason. Now we're going to Jason. [01:49:40.060 --> 01:49:46.060] Okay. Jason, we were talking about Jason. Now we're talking to you in California. [01:49:46.060 --> 01:49:49.060] Hello, Jason in California. [01:49:49.060 --> 01:50:02.060] Hi, Randy, Brett. Yeah, so if I confused you guys yesterday a little bit, I have a hearing on... [01:50:02.060 --> 01:50:07.060] Okay. You're the one with the Trader Joe's. [01:50:07.060 --> 01:50:10.060] I'm the Trader Joe's issue. [01:50:10.060 --> 01:50:18.060] Give our listeners a really brief synopsis so they'll kind of have an idea of where you're at and what's going on. [01:50:18.060 --> 01:50:28.060] Okay. Yeah. Brief synopsis is they retaliate against me by filing for a restraining order. [01:50:28.060 --> 01:50:32.060] Why did they retaliate against you? For what? [01:50:32.060 --> 01:50:52.060] For fighting the mask issue with them and sending them notices last year and basically kind of setting up a lawsuit that I still haven't filed yet. [01:50:52.060 --> 01:51:10.060] Okay. If I get this right, you gave them notice and opportunity to cure and they treated that notice and opportunity to cure as some kind of a threat and then filed a restraining order against you for threatening them. Am I correct there? [01:51:10.060 --> 01:51:23.060] No, no. There's about six months in between. There's a lot that went down with different employees. [01:51:23.060 --> 01:51:31.060] But this restraining order was claiming that you were harassing the employees in their store, right? [01:51:31.060 --> 01:51:33.060] Yeah. [01:51:33.060 --> 01:51:40.060] When it was the employees that were following you around telling you you're not welcome and you're not allowed to shop here and all that stuff, right? [01:51:40.060 --> 01:51:43.060] You were just shopping and they were following you. [01:51:43.060 --> 01:51:44.060] Yeah. [01:51:44.060 --> 01:51:47.060] That was how the harassment. Okay. [01:51:47.060 --> 01:51:53.060] Yeah. And they didn't like that I would film when they would do that. [01:51:53.060 --> 01:52:14.060] So yeah, no. What really tipped the edge was, you know, I called the police on two different occasions and after the second one, and I still, you know, I haven't filed any criminal complaints and I do have questions about that still. [01:52:14.060 --> 01:52:27.060] But I had spoken to a district manager who I discovered was, it seems like she's like the kingpin directing all this action against me. [01:52:27.060 --> 01:52:38.060] And the day after we spoke, they filed this thing. So, but I still don't officially know who's done this. [01:52:38.060 --> 01:52:47.060] Now, we had, we've had one, two, three hearings so far. [01:52:47.060 --> 01:52:54.060] We're on lawyer number three on their end. [01:52:54.060 --> 01:53:09.060] And it's just, it's been a big mess. It's like, you know, filing motions and they're setting hearing dates that don't make sense, you know. [01:53:09.060 --> 01:53:26.060] So right in September, I requested a continuance because I sent discovery and it was granted to complete this discovery. [01:53:26.060 --> 01:53:44.060] Meanwhile, they decided not to send me anything at all except a letter saying why they, you know, that discovery is not allowed in restraining order hearings and a few other things that are just total nonsense. [01:53:44.060 --> 01:53:55.060] So, and I also, you know, I have motions that were before the court that everything got continued to November 1st. [01:53:55.060 --> 01:54:07.060] And, but I was expecting to have some discovery and so I don't have that. There's, and I... [01:54:07.060 --> 01:54:13.060] Okay. On the discovery, have you filed a motion to compel? [01:54:13.060 --> 01:54:29.060] No, no, not yet. I did a, I did a motion to show cause. I was under the impression that that was a little more damaging. To show cause why they shouldn't be held in contempt. [01:54:29.060 --> 01:54:30.060] That'll work. [01:54:30.060 --> 01:54:39.060] I don't know, I don't know what I'm doing so I don't know what the ramifications are of that and what to expect. [01:54:39.060 --> 01:54:47.060] Well, you can always expect the court to dismiss, to deny your pleadings out of hand. [01:54:47.060 --> 01:54:51.060] Your only purpose is to set the record. [01:54:51.060 --> 01:55:11.060] You should not care what that judge does. They use these inferior judges to railroad citizens so that they get the citizen not to exercise their rights. [01:55:11.060 --> 01:55:15.060] The worst thing to happen is betrayal. [01:55:15.060 --> 01:55:24.060] And you expect a just adjudication in the court and when you don't get it, you feel betrayed. [01:55:24.060 --> 01:55:35.060] It's extremely debilitating and they take advantage of that and 99% of the time it works for them. [01:55:35.060 --> 01:55:40.060] You need to be that 1% that wipes the floor with them. [01:55:40.060 --> 01:55:51.060] Well, I'm definitely, so what I have is a temporary, I have a commissioner acting as a temporary judge. [01:55:51.060 --> 01:56:08.060] And the reason I haven't tried to get rid of her yet is because she did like one good thing that she potentially wants to do right even though she's made multiple mistakes. [01:56:08.060 --> 01:56:13.060] But what was I going to say? [01:56:13.060 --> 01:56:16.060] You were going to say Randy's a really nice guy? [01:56:16.060 --> 01:56:19.060] You guys are really both really nice. [01:56:19.060 --> 01:56:21.060] Oh, right. So she made a point of- [01:56:21.060 --> 01:56:24.060] No, no, no, you deluded it. [01:56:24.060 --> 01:56:26.060] Okay, go ahead. [01:56:26.060 --> 01:56:29.060] You're very nice. [01:56:29.060 --> 01:56:38.060] It's like basically that she's never, it's highly unusual what's been going on with my case. [01:56:38.060 --> 01:56:43.060] They spend like 15 minutes tops and they just blow through these restraining orders. [01:56:43.060 --> 01:56:48.060] This has been the first hearing within July. [01:56:48.060 --> 01:57:12.060] So I don't see how, I mean, okay, right. So everything is scheduled for November 1st, which is a motion to dismiss, a motion to correct minute orders, opposition to remote appearances. [01:57:12.060 --> 01:57:18.060] And then the show cause has been scheduled for the 17th. [01:57:18.060 --> 01:57:20.060] So the show cause on your motions. [01:57:20.060 --> 01:57:29.060] So essentially they're going to dispose of your case before they get to the hearing to address your motions. [01:57:29.060 --> 01:57:31.060] Wait, say that again? [01:57:31.060 --> 01:57:43.060] Okay, hang on. We're about to run out of time, but they have a hearing that will bypass your motions if I understood what you were saying right. But we'll pick this up on the other side. [01:57:43.060 --> 01:57:47.060] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue de la Radio. [01:57:47.060 --> 01:57:51.060] I'm not going to give out the call in number. We're still full. Hang on. [01:57:51.060 --> 01:57:53.060] We'll be right back. [01:57:53.060 --> 01:58:01.060] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [01:58:01.060 --> 01:58:10.060] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. [01:58:10.060 --> 01:58:12.060] Enter the recovery version. [01:58:12.060 --> 01:58:31.060] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [01:58:31.060 --> 01:58:54.060] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. [01:58:54.060 --> 01:59:03.060] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.