[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.500 --> 00:09.500] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.500 --> 00:11.000] Our liberty depends on it. [00:11.000 --> 00:16.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights. [00:16.500 --> 00:18.500] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.500 --> 00:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.000 --> 00:27.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:27.000 --> 00:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.000 --> 00:34.500] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:34.500 --> 00:38.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [00:38.000 --> 00:42.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.000 --> 00:45.500] Start over with Startpage. [00:45.500 --> 00:50.500] Most of us know that taking the Fifth means you're choosing to remain silent about a criminal matter. [00:50.500 --> 00:55.000] It's a good way to remember that the Fifth Amendment spells out what can and can't happen to you [00:55.000 --> 00:57.000] when you're accused of a criminal offense. [00:57.000 --> 01:02.000] The Fifth guarantees due process, prohibits trying someone more than once for the same crime, [01:02.000 --> 01:04.000] and lets you keep your mouth shut. [01:04.000 --> 01:09.000] The Founding Fathers inserted these constitutional provisions to protect citizens from torture. [01:09.000 --> 01:13.500] Back in the day, governments often used painful methods to extract confessions. [01:13.500 --> 01:18.000] The Fifth Amendment also prohibits the government from taking your house and land without paying you for it. [01:18.000 --> 01:20.000] That used to happen a lot too. [01:20.000 --> 01:25.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.000 --> 01:35.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:35.000 --> 01:39.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:39.000 --> 01:41.000] Our liberty depends on it. [01:41.000 --> 01:47.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:47.000 --> 01:49.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:49.000 --> 01:52.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:52.000 --> 01:57.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:57.000 --> 02:02.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:02.000 --> 02:05.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [02:05.000 --> 02:09.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [02:09.000 --> 02:13.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:13.000 --> 02:16.000] Start over with StartPage. [02:16.000 --> 02:19.000] The number 666 reminds me of evil. [02:19.000 --> 02:24.000] I also associate it with the sick feeling one might get when falsely accused of a heinous crime [02:24.000 --> 02:28.000] or when thinking about sickos who actually do commit acts of murder and mayhem. [02:28.000 --> 02:32.000] Either way, the number 666 can help you remember that the Sixth Amendment [02:32.000 --> 02:37.000] deals with the constitutionally guaranteed rights Americans have in a criminal trial. [02:37.000 --> 02:41.000] Those include the right to a speedy public trial, the right to an impartial jury, [02:41.000 --> 02:45.000] the right to full information about the charges, the right to an attorney, [02:45.000 --> 02:48.000] and the right to confront any witnesses face to face. [02:48.000 --> 02:53.000] 666, sick, sickos, and the Sixth Amendment, get it? [02:53.000 --> 03:16.000] Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:24.000 --> 03:26.000] Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do? [03:26.000 --> 03:28.000] What you gonna do when they come for you? [03:28.000 --> 03:31.000] Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do? [03:31.000 --> 03:34.000] What you gonna do when they come for you? [03:34.000 --> 03:37.000] When you were eight and you had bad traits, [03:37.000 --> 03:39.000] You'll go to school and learn the golden rule. [03:39.000 --> 03:42.000] So why are you acting like a bloody fool? [03:42.000 --> 03:45.000] If you get hot then you must get cool. [03:45.000 --> 03:48.000] Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do? [03:48.000 --> 03:51.000] What you gonna do when they come for you? [03:51.000 --> 03:54.000] Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do? [03:54.000 --> 03:57.000] What you gonna do when they come for you? [03:57.000 --> 04:00.000] You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one. [04:00.000 --> 04:03.000] You chuck it on your mother, and you chuck it on your father. [04:03.000 --> 04:06.000] You chuck it on your brother, and you chuck it on your sister [04:06.000 --> 04:08.000] You chuck it on that one and you chuck it on me. [04:08.000 --> 04:11.000] Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do? [04:11.000 --> 04:13.000] What you gonna do when they come for you? [04:13.000 --> 04:16.000] Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do? [04:16.000 --> 04:18.000] What you gonna do when they come for you? [04:18.000 --> 04:21.840] What you gonna do? What you gonna do when they come for you? [04:21.840 --> 04:27.280] Bad boys, bad boys. What you gonna do? What you gonna do when they come for you? [04:27.280 --> 04:32.240] Bad boys, bad boys. What you gonna do? What you gonna do when they come for you? [04:32.240 --> 04:39.280] Hey, howdy, howdy. I'm in a conundrum today. Brett didn't tell me what the date was. [04:39.840 --> 04:42.320] He always tells me what the date was. Oh, that's right. [04:42.320 --> 04:46.480] Well, he gives me the wrong date. Can I give you November? Will you buy that? [04:46.480 --> 04:51.120] October. How about October? It's the 29th of September. [04:52.800 --> 04:58.080] Brett Fountain. Thursday. Do we get all the pieces in, Brett? [05:00.000 --> 05:08.720] Okay. You were going to talk to us about what's going on with the DPS and a certain JP you talk [05:08.720 --> 05:16.080] to. Oh, okay. Yeah, all of this is connected to a speeding ticket. You know, Randy, I haven't [05:16.080 --> 05:23.840] gotten a ticket in a lot of years. These police just, sheriff, anybody, they just pull up behind [05:23.840 --> 05:28.960] me. About the time it takes to run some plates and they back off and go somewhere else. They [05:28.960 --> 05:35.120] decided they're not pulling me over. So that's been the pattern for, you know, a number of years now. [05:35.120 --> 05:41.520] And well, I borrowed my wife's car and I went to and across Texas and got myself a speeding [05:41.520 --> 05:49.120] ticket. This has been about a month ago and they didn't seem to mind pulling that car over. I don't [05:49.120 --> 06:00.400] know. I suspect you'll break them from sucking eggs. I imagine whatever's connected to that [06:00.400 --> 06:05.440] license plate's about, they're going to get a little more information tagged to it. [06:05.440 --> 06:11.440] But yeah, I've been walking through the process of this. And at the very beginning, [06:12.160 --> 06:16.720] first thing I did was I reached out to the director of the department of public safety [06:17.440 --> 06:24.320] with a compliment for the trooper who behaved himself well and did not, you know, [06:24.880 --> 06:29.440] he wasn't putting on airs. He wasn't acting like an arrogant, you know, [06:29.440 --> 06:36.320] bully or anything like that. You can't say that other word you were thinking on the air. [06:36.320 --> 06:44.320] Yeah, several in a row that I had to skip past. Yeah, which they tend to generally act like. [06:44.320 --> 06:51.280] We just say bully. You can say anal sphincter, but you can't get any more graphic than that. [06:51.280 --> 07:04.160] Okay. Well, so he behaved himself well. You know, he's, I could tell he's not had good training. [07:05.360 --> 07:10.560] He was doing things that he ought never to do, like pull somebody over, pretend like there's [07:10.560 --> 07:15.600] an emergency and throw his lights on him and, you know, see somebody at their liberty when [07:16.160 --> 07:20.240] there was no crime. There was not even any regulated activity going on. Nothing. He doesn't [07:20.240 --> 07:25.440] even know how to tell what regulated activity looks like. He needs better training. He's going [07:25.440 --> 07:30.720] to get himself in trouble, get himself sued and have all kinds of problems. And he's likely to [07:30.720 --> 07:41.200] get a complaint to the people who were supposed to have trained him. Right. So I've got the [07:41.200 --> 07:50.640] the director, we started out on, I think, a pretty good thing. You know, he was appreciating the [07:50.640 --> 07:59.840] compliment. And as far as my concerns about training, he immediately got some of his underlings [07:59.840 --> 08:06.320] to address this and get with me and hear me out. And I wrote an executive summary for the [08:06.320 --> 08:16.480] Department of Public Safety. And it looked like our first two conversations went really well. [08:16.480 --> 08:24.480] And they seem to be open to looking at all these things. I'm now beginning to get get the idea [08:25.440 --> 08:33.680] that it is as I was hoping it wouldn't be. And they're just doing the, you know, [08:33.680 --> 08:39.360] blow and smoke thing where they pretend like they care. And all they really want to do is [08:40.240 --> 08:46.320] make sure they're covered liability wise, that they I don't have anything that's too dangerous [08:46.320 --> 08:51.680] for them. Well, now they've decided that I do. This is looking really bad for them. [08:51.680 --> 08:58.880] And they've shut off communications. Well, the director has said that he's handed it off to [08:58.880 --> 09:08.000] his inspector general, and they take these things very seriously. So yeah, I don't know if that's [09:08.000 --> 09:12.640] going to go much of anywhere else except just criminal complaints and lawsuits. I don't think [09:12.640 --> 09:19.440] that's going to be turning into the training cooperation that I was hoping for. Although [09:19.440 --> 09:23.200] maybe that could happen in the future, you know, beat them up a little bit and then say, [09:23.200 --> 09:27.680] here's how you fix it. I was really hoping that that would happen first. They sounded like they [09:27.680 --> 09:33.840] sounded like they were open to that. Oh, well, yeah, the JP I spoke with today, I was encouraged [09:35.440 --> 09:40.480] to I was looking for somebody to sign off on a federal criminal complaint. [09:43.040 --> 09:47.040] Just so that everybody knows, if you have a federal criminal complaint, [09:48.800 --> 09:53.840] you'll see in the federal rules of criminal procedure that the one who needs to sign it, [09:53.840 --> 09:58.480] just like you would sign a state one, you'd go to a notary public, but with a federal criminal [09:58.480 --> 10:03.680] complaint, you need to go to a federal magistrate judge. That's the person that you stand before [10:03.680 --> 10:08.480] and hold up your right hand. Instead of the notary public, you're signing in front of this [10:08.720 --> 10:14.960] federal magistrate judge. And you say, I swear, this is the truth, or a firm, you know, you're [10:14.960 --> 10:22.480] signing in front of a federal magistrate judge. But they tend to not have any time for us. [10:22.480 --> 10:28.720] They think that they're more important or whatever. And you pretty much can't get an appointment with [10:28.720 --> 10:35.600] one. So you try and then they say no, or they can get their marshals to swarm around you and act [10:35.600 --> 10:41.760] like bullies and kick you out of the building. Either way, you, you now have made an effort. [10:42.480 --> 10:48.480] And you invoke the last part of the federal criminal rule, which says, if no federal magistrate [10:48.480 --> 10:56.720] judge is available, any state or local judicial officer. So that means you can have that point. [10:57.760 --> 11:09.920] Let me interject slightly. Attorney General opinion H 500 says any magistrate may take any complaint, [11:09.920 --> 11:18.160] any complaint, felony or misdemeanor state or federal from anywhere in the state. [11:20.000 --> 11:27.920] 2.10 tells the magistrate that he shall keep the peace in the state. [11:30.240 --> 11:33.760] I had one JP tell me that he didn't care what the attorney general thinks. [11:34.320 --> 11:36.080] And I said, well, fair enough, I don't either. [11:36.080 --> 11:40.240] So, okay, I had to see the rule. [11:40.960 --> 11:47.120] I had Judge Shipman in Denton tell me when I quoted that to him, [11:48.000 --> 11:53.600] Mr. Kelton, as far as I'm concerned, you can use an attorney general's opinion for toilet paper. [11:55.040 --> 12:01.520] I said, well, your honor, I hope, you know, an attorney general opinion is a legal brief. [12:01.520 --> 12:08.880] 3. I hope you don't find the underlying stare decisis quite as versatile. [12:15.440 --> 12:17.440] Well, so I read into this JP today. [12:18.560 --> 12:23.440] The fact that I can find any state or local judicial officer, anybody that's a magistrate [12:23.440 --> 12:28.880] around here, I can get any of them to do it. Well, that's all well and good. What if you can't find [12:28.880 --> 12:34.960] any? They tend to, you know, Friday is just impossible. Thursday, they're already starting [12:34.960 --> 12:41.440] to take off half days, they leave, you know, 10 in the morning. It's not a really easy thing, [12:42.000 --> 12:47.920] which kind of makes me wonder. We're asking these peace officers and anybody that's going [12:47.920 --> 12:53.360] to make an arrest to take somebody before a magistrate. My goodness, they're not necessarily [12:53.360 --> 13:00.960] that easy to find. They tend to slip out only work half days. Anyway, got ahold of one today. [13:01.520 --> 13:09.440] And I was enjoying my conversation with him because he sounds like us. He sounds like he cares what [13:09.440 --> 13:18.320] the law says. And he's not going to do anything that deviates from that. So I told him how much [13:18.320 --> 13:28.640] I appreciate that. I said I haven't found most judicial officers to have this, to care about [13:28.640 --> 13:35.120] this. I can tell, sir, that you've been reading the laws. And that's highly unusual, the judicial [13:35.120 --> 13:39.280] officers that I've been encountering. And I really appreciate that about you. He smiled and, you know, [13:39.280 --> 13:47.040] he's an older fellow. You can tell that we had that in common. But then I asked him, I started [13:47.040 --> 13:51.520] walking out the door and he said he's going to go and get a phone number for somebody over at [13:53.680 --> 14:00.720] the jail. And I said, Oh, do you do magistrations in this county? He said, I sure do. I said, hmm, [14:01.920 --> 14:08.080] that I'm not real sure that actually exists. I don't think that's a thing. I think we've [14:08.080 --> 14:14.400] just been told that's a thing. And what it actually ought to be is the examining trial. [14:14.400 --> 14:19.360] He goes, no, no, registration. That's a thing. That's a it's a chapter 16 code of criminal [14:19.360 --> 14:26.000] procedure. And I had a big old smile come across my face. And I said, that's the examining trial. [14:27.040 --> 14:31.520] He said, but we don't have people come in there. They can't do it. I said, yeah, it's you can't do [14:31.520 --> 14:38.560] the examining cross examine the witnesses. He had this look come across his face like I hit him with [14:38.560 --> 14:50.160] something. He was chewing on that. And he said, well, wow. I need to get ahold of this guy. [14:51.440 --> 14:55.280] So he wanted to go ahead and end the conversation right there. But you could tell he was going to [14:55.280 --> 15:00.640] have something to chew on. And that encouraged me. I think I'll go back over there in the next [15:01.280 --> 15:08.480] days and bring him some information to review. And who knows, maybe we'll have an opportunity [15:08.480 --> 15:14.640] to see this go the easy way instead of having to push on people that really don't care. [15:14.640 --> 15:19.520] And they've got their ego involved. And the only way they're going to do what the law says is if [15:19.520 --> 15:27.040] they get beat up. Maybe this guy's not like that. We'll see. Good luck with that. I have a son-in-law [15:27.040 --> 15:38.400] who's a JP. Yeah. And he called me recently about someone that used my documents in one of his [15:38.400 --> 15:44.720] cases and was demanding a examining trial. And he called me and asked me what he should do. [15:45.280 --> 15:50.720] He said, read the code. Do exactly what the code says. This guy wants an examining trial, [15:50.720 --> 15:55.680] just call it a set of hearing. Have the police officer who wrote the citation there [15:56.960 --> 16:04.000] and ask him if he would like to make a statement. And if he does, fine, let him make his statement. [16:04.000 --> 16:11.440] If not, then ask him to tell his side of the story. And when he's done, have the policeman [16:11.440 --> 16:17.040] tell his side of the story. Listen to both of them. Decide if you think there's sufficient cause. [16:17.040 --> 16:22.560] If you do, issue an order stating that you found probable cause, seal it in an envelope and send [16:22.560 --> 16:26.160] it to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction. Well, that happens to be your clerk. So you can [16:26.160 --> 16:33.920] just hand it to the clerk and you're done. You got it. He just sent the guy a notice that he [16:33.920 --> 16:44.880] was denying an examining trial. He's denying it? Yeah. He told me. Uh-oh. I read the date it was [16:45.760 --> 16:55.200] and they made sense to me, but he didn't jump off the cliff. And neither am I. [16:55.200 --> 16:58.080] Brandy, kill him, Brett Fountain. We'll be right back. [16:58.080 --> 17:04.320] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [17:04.320 --> 17:09.120] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we changed all that. [17:09.120 --> 17:15.200] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [17:15.200 --> 17:19.920] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, [17:19.920 --> 17:26.400] young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse [17:26.400 --> 17:32.400] all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust young Jevity so much we [17:32.400 --> 17:38.560] became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order [17:38.560 --> 17:46.400] from logosradio.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize the [17:46.400 --> 17:52.240] benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved [17:52.240 --> 17:57.920] health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now. [17:57.920 --> 18:03.680] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word? [18:03.680 --> 18:10.160] Then tune in to logosradio.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk, [18:10.160 --> 18:16.240] where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. Study to show [18:16.240 --> 18:22.320] thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of [18:22.320 --> 18:27.520] truth. Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by [18:27.520 --> 18:33.200] verse and discuss the true gospel message. Our second hour topical studies will vary each week [18:33.200 --> 18:38.720] with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development. We wish to reflect God's [18:38.720 --> 18:43.760] light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to [18:43.760 --> 18:49.040] transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. So tune in to Scripture [18:49.040 --> 18:56.240] Talk live on logosradio.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of [18:56.240 --> 19:14.240] the Scriptures. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradio.com. [20:26.240 --> 20:53.200] Okay, we are back. This is the Wheel of Law Radio, Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountain. [20:53.200 --> 21:01.120] Yeah, Randy, when we went out, you were saying that your nephew, your son-in-law was not going [21:01.120 --> 21:05.760] to run off the cliff because he was trying to figure out what to do with this examining trial. [21:05.760 --> 21:11.600] And then when he did find out what to do, he apparently got himself some bad advice and decided [21:11.600 --> 21:19.280] to deny the examining trial. Yeah, and you know how disappointing that is before he got into office. [21:19.280 --> 21:26.800] I went through all this code with it. And then once he got into office, he got my pleadings filed [21:26.800 --> 21:33.200] by someone else and he told me that he read them and they sounded right. But it doesn't [21:33.200 --> 21:43.760] comport with my training. Imagine that. And then I find that he sent an order denying an examining [21:43.760 --> 21:56.080] trial. Man, that is damning. Not good. Who told him to do that? You know, you bargrieved this [21:56.080 --> 22:00.880] lawyer that became the county attorney and it hurt his feelings because that's the only [22:00.880 --> 22:07.120] bar grievance he ever got. What was his name, Brett? I'm trying to think of his name. He started with an [22:07.120 --> 22:16.480] A. Aeberg. Aeberg. I don't know. And he was truly a nice guy. And I chewed him out recently [22:16.480 --> 22:23.520] because he didn't run for election. And then he's probably the one that told him this. [22:25.280 --> 22:32.480] And now... Oh, I know who you mean. Yeah. Yeah, Aeberg. Thomas, was it Thomas? Yeah, [22:32.480 --> 22:37.200] I accidentally called him Aeberg. I didn't realize at first I had the name wrong. [22:39.760 --> 22:46.960] Oh, that's low down. I didn't mean to, honest. I thought that was really his thing. Yeah. Yeah, [22:46.960 --> 22:59.840] sure. Anyway, these are people who otherwise are well-meaning and they want to do things right. [22:59.840 --> 23:10.080] I've been some 25, 30 years putting the law in front of them. They read the law, they agree with [23:10.080 --> 23:18.160] me, but they just cannot bring themselves to do what the black letter law says is the right thing [23:18.160 --> 23:28.080] to do when someone of some apparent authority tells them otherwise. So I was just talking to [23:28.080 --> 23:37.200] Brad on the break. I am planning to sue Texas State University. They are in San Marcos, Texas. [23:38.480 --> 23:48.800] And they are the ones who train these officers. Brett's agreed to come with me if once I sue, [23:48.800 --> 23:55.440] I'm going to sue them for 400 million. I've been planning to refile an amended pleading. [23:55.440 --> 24:05.920] File an amended pleading and take out the request for findings for a petition for declaratory [24:05.920 --> 24:12.480] judgment. I'm going to take that out and file it as a separate action. And then sue all these [24:12.480 --> 24:21.760] litigants for doing what Texas Tech trained them to do. Texas Tech and the Texas Commission on [24:21.760 --> 24:27.680] Law Enforcement, I'm going to sue both of them and neither one of them will have any immunity [24:28.320 --> 24:36.880] because what they're doing is, I don't know, I shouldn't say that yet. The Texas Commission [24:36.880 --> 24:42.640] on Law Enforcement may have some kind of qualified immunity, but I'm going to claim that these are [24:42.640 --> 24:49.280] administrative acts and they won't have immunity for them, but we'll see. I don't care if they have [24:49.280 --> 24:59.200] immunity. Texas State University will have zero immunity. So they're potentially 100% liable and [24:59.200 --> 25:05.520] if they, you know, once you get them in court and beat them up a while, we may make a deal. [25:06.880 --> 25:14.480] They write me a very, very large check and then I or Brett and I teach their officers how it should [25:14.480 --> 25:26.560] be done. Will that be cool? We might get that fixed. Get Texas doing it right and they find [25:26.560 --> 25:35.920] out that this mass incarceration problem starts to ease. The public's anger against the police [25:35.920 --> 25:41.120] starts to ease. Everything gets better for everybody. We may get the whole country to do it. [25:41.120 --> 25:57.600] But I'm encouraged. So that's where we're at. I've been working on Victoria County. [26:00.560 --> 26:07.760] The more I think about it, the more I like what happened. These guys don't know what I [26:07.760 --> 26:13.200] have coming at them. I could tell them what I have kind of coming at them. [26:15.040 --> 26:20.560] And just like the JP you talked to Brett, I don't think they'd be able to wrap their heads around it. [26:22.240 --> 26:28.160] Yeah, like your son-in-law. That's, that's, they have the seems like the best of interest, [26:28.160 --> 26:35.120] the best of intentions. And yet I just can't get over the hump because some lawyer told them, [26:35.120 --> 26:43.520] oh, the law doesn't mean what it says. This JP that I sued in Victoria County, [26:45.440 --> 26:53.280] after watching him and listening to him, it is clear to me he believes that he's doing the right [26:53.280 --> 26:59.760] thing. Initially thought that I was just some kind of fake troublemaker. I don't think he [26:59.760 --> 27:09.040] believes that anymore. It was clear. I spoke to him in the courtroom and he thanked me for my [27:09.040 --> 27:18.720] service. And I was slightly taken aback by that. But he said that to me, to let me know that he had [27:18.720 --> 27:24.640] read all of my pleadings because that was buried in the pleadings. You know, the fact that these [27:24.640 --> 27:31.360] rights are extremely valuable to me. I paid for them. So he obviously read that and he wanted me [27:31.360 --> 27:39.760] to know he had read the pleadings. I believe that he honestly believes that he's doing the right [27:39.760 --> 27:48.400] things the right way. But it hasn't worked out too well for him yet. And you know, we, Brett and I [27:48.400 --> 27:54.560] have been talking about, if we're going to fix the system, we've got to take it on. And in what I'm [27:54.560 --> 28:04.160] doing now, I carefully crafted this as the fight that I wanted to have. I went down and asked him [28:04.160 --> 28:10.480] to issue criminal complaints and he refused to do it. I asked him to issue them under 15.09. [28:10.480 --> 28:19.280] When a complaint is forwarded to the magistrate, complete in accordance with 15.05, the magistrate, [28:19.280 --> 28:25.440] and 15.05 just has, states the requisites for a complaint. I just heard that mentioned by the [28:25.440 --> 28:30.080] Court of Criminal Appeals in a hearing someone sent me a link to. They mentioned 15.05. [28:31.280 --> 28:37.920] If it's complete in accordance with 15.05, the magistrate shall issue a warrant forthwith. [28:37.920 --> 28:43.200] Now, what part of that is hard to understand? It does not say, may, might, or can't, if he wants to. [28:43.200 --> 28:48.640] It's obligatory. And the reason I filed it the way I did was because it was obligatory. [28:50.000 --> 28:58.080] No discretion, no discretion, no immunity. So I got him to do something that he was, not do [28:58.080 --> 29:05.280] something he was ordered to do. Got him dead bang. We went into court, you know, the first hearing we [29:05.280 --> 29:12.640] had was on Zoom and they had 30 some odd, 39 or 36 listeners. They didn't like that. So they ordered [29:12.640 --> 29:21.840] me to drive 500 miles down to a hearing. Well, that didn't work out too good for them. This judge [29:21.840 --> 29:28.640] sat up there and said that he was appointed judge to hear this case. As they will in that case, [29:28.640 --> 29:35.680] if you're an appointed county judge, here I have some documents for the court. Adam, and there are [29:35.680 --> 29:45.600] five criminal complaints against the justice of the peace and the sheriff. You want to do this again, [29:45.600 --> 29:54.400] guys? I was about to go to my boxers. It's good when you come back. Every step they take to turn [29:54.400 --> 30:01.520] the heat on. Hang on. We'll be right back. Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information [30:01.520 --> 30:06.160] and you may trust them to keep it safe. But it turns out that even the most trusted companies [30:06.160 --> 30:11.120] may be unwittingly revealing your secrets. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with [30:11.120 --> 30:17.760] details. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back [30:17.760 --> 30:22.880] again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to disappear. [30:22.880 --> 30:28.720] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, [30:28.720 --> 30:33.840] it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com, [30:33.840 --> 30:39.920] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage. [30:41.520 --> 30:46.800] Data privacy is a big deal. So nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle [30:46.800 --> 30:51.360] your personal information. But what happens if it escapes the privacy of your privacy? [30:51.360 --> 30:56.480] But what happens if it escapes their control? It's not an idle question. According to a recent [30:56.480 --> 31:02.560] survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was breached by hackers in the [31:02.560 --> 31:07.920] last year. That's one more reason you should trust your searches to startpage.com. Unlike [31:07.920 --> 31:12.800] other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you. They've never been hacked, [31:12.800 --> 31:17.600] but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals to see. The cupboard would be bare. [31:17.600 --> 31:22.640] Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way. I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. [31:22.640 --> 31:50.480] More news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:53.360 --> 31:59.360] My son, my uncle, my nephew, my son, go to buildingwatch.org. Why it's hell, why it matters, [31:59.360 --> 32:05.520] and what you can do. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. In today's [32:05.520 --> 32:09.280] America, we live in an us-against-them society. And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free [32:09.280 --> 32:13.440] society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are [32:13.440 --> 32:17.040] the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, [32:17.040 --> 32:21.600] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive [32:21.600 --> 32:26.000] opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's [32:26.000 --> 32:30.000] Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive [32:30.000 --> 32:33.840] teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold [32:33.840 --> 32:37.760] courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to [32:37.760 --> 32:42.320] ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's [32:42.320 --> 32:47.040] book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 [32:47.040 --> 32:51.280] seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for [32:51.280 --> 32:55.520] your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and [32:55.520 --> 33:23.360] together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. Yeah, Mr. Officer, you're taking the [33:55.680 --> 34:01.920] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton. We're at Fountain Rule of Law Radio. And we were talking, [34:02.800 --> 34:13.680] this is the 29th day of September, 2022. And we were talking about taking on the system, [34:14.880 --> 34:22.640] set them up and just walk through them. So I filed this singular lawsuit against the judge [34:22.640 --> 34:31.600] in his personal capacity. He hired some chump lawyers. And they filed a response for him. [34:32.640 --> 34:41.920] And they screwed it up. So we had a hearing and the trial judge recused himself. I got the order [34:41.920 --> 34:51.520] and the order said that a motion to recuse was filed and I approved his sui sponte. That sui [34:51.520 --> 34:58.400] sponte, he does that on his own, doesn't need anybody, any briefs or any oral argument, [34:58.400 --> 35:06.800] he just does it on his own. Spontaneously. But I didn't remember being served with a [35:07.520 --> 35:17.920] motion to recuse as is required by 18A. So I checked the record. There was no motion filed. [35:17.920 --> 35:28.800] The judge said there was in his order, but I couldn't find it. So I objected to it because [35:29.360 --> 35:36.720] that judge is under contract with me. He's under contract because he swore on his oath, [35:36.720 --> 35:44.640] he would administer that court. Then he took monetary remuneration for his efforts [35:44.640 --> 35:53.280] to administer in that court. And when something of value changes hands, the contract is consummated. [35:55.040 --> 35:58.800] Now comes along a case he doesn't want to rule on, so he wants to duck and run for [35:58.800 --> 36:05.520] coverage. No, no, no, no, no, I don't think so. You are my elected judge and you are elected [36:06.240 --> 36:13.200] so that I have remedy against you for bad behavior. I told them in this hearing, [36:13.200 --> 36:21.200] I don't want any retired judge against whom I have no remedy. Normally I have remedy with [36:21.200 --> 36:26.720] the ballot box, but he's a retired judge, so I don't have that. And in the court, I told him [36:26.720 --> 36:31.520] I could file a judicial conduct complaint against you, but that wouldn't do any good. And he got this [36:32.640 --> 36:38.160] kind of sardonic smile and nodded. Yeah, that's right. I had no remedy, so I objected to him. [36:38.160 --> 36:47.440] And this judge subsequently recused himself, even though we couldn't get there yet. My position was [36:48.000 --> 36:55.280] that he was never properly appointed. Since the trial judge never properly recused himself, [36:56.720 --> 37:03.200] he has to recuse for cause. That's in the code. He can't just recuse himself because he wants to. [37:03.200 --> 37:10.720] And you have to be able to challenge that with an opposition to his motion. Precisely. So [37:12.720 --> 37:22.560] the head administrative judge of the district, Sid something rather, he appointed a retired judge [37:22.560 --> 37:26.640] to hear the case. I went, wait a minute, wait a minute. We didn't get there yet. [37:26.640 --> 37:33.200] We didn't get there yet. My argument in the court was we didn't get to [37:35.040 --> 37:39.200] recuse judge yet because the recuse of order was filed, but it was objected to. [37:41.200 --> 37:46.240] So it's still in the trial court. So you can't be appointed. [37:49.040 --> 37:54.320] So who hearing this? You did make some comment at some point about him being the hatchet man, [37:54.320 --> 38:00.800] or how did you call it? He kind of chuckled about that. Yeah, but he knew I was right. [38:03.200 --> 38:07.360] He didn't argue at all because he knew I was right. I think that's exactly what he was there for. [38:07.920 --> 38:13.920] And that's precisely why they do this. So he went ahead and recused himself. He said, Mr. [38:13.920 --> 38:19.760] Kelly, do you want me to make a ruling on this? No, we didn't get to you yet. I can't tell that [38:19.760 --> 38:24.960] you have any standing. He said, well, I'm going to recuse myself and recuses yourself and closes [38:24.960 --> 38:30.640] the hearing. So they set another hearing, but this time they don't do it on zoom because they [38:30.640 --> 38:37.760] don't want 36 people listening. They forced me to drive 200 miles or 400 miles down to [38:39.120 --> 38:45.440] Victoria County. Well, guys, let's see how that works out for you. I get down there and they've [38:45.440 --> 38:50.240] got this judge appointed. And in the appointment, the head administrative judge of the district [38:51.360 --> 39:01.200] said that this person was Joel Johnson out of B County and he was the senior judge for the 156th [39:01.200 --> 39:12.480] judicial district. Is that a fact, Jack? So I checked the 156th judicial district and he was [39:12.480 --> 39:18.320] mentioned. Wait, but you don't just believe whatever they tell you? No, I'm just skeptical [39:18.320 --> 39:27.280] that way. You get old, you get a little skeptical. I know it's gauche, but life is what it is. [39:28.160 --> 39:37.920] So it turns out he is not a senior judge. Well, let me step back. He is not an elected judge for [39:37.920 --> 39:45.120] the 156th judicial district. I call down there and ask about him. And the woman I talked to [39:45.120 --> 39:52.240] didn't really know anything about him because she's only been there two years. So you're [39:52.240 --> 39:57.440] working in a district clerk's office and you don't know anything about a senior district judge. [39:57.440 --> 40:08.800] Well, she said that he only does the criminal docket. Brad, what did that mean? He's not an [40:08.800 --> 40:14.560] elected judge. There's no evidence that he's been- He does the criminal docket. Yeah. What could that [40:14.560 --> 40:22.000] mean? Shoot, I don't know. I think it means he does- You think it's pulling him like he's retired? [40:22.000 --> 40:35.680] I think he does the magistrations in the jail, but he can't do that. He's not a magistrate. [40:40.320 --> 40:48.560] Guys, naughty, naughty. And I want to know who committed pampering with a government document [40:48.560 --> 40:56.560] by putting this statement in the order, appointing this judge, stating that he was a senior [40:57.280 --> 41:03.440] judge for the 156th judicial district. Now, he did not say he was a senior [41:04.560 --> 41:11.520] district judge for the 156th district, but a reasonable person of ordinary prudence [41:11.520 --> 41:20.320] would take that verbiage. If I said, I am a judge for the 156th judicial district, are they going to [41:20.320 --> 41:28.320] think I'm a justice of the peace? No, of course not. You sound like you're a district judge that way. [41:29.040 --> 41:38.000] That's what it sounded like to me, but he's not a district judge. So that, to me, is not only [41:38.000 --> 41:45.040] tampering with a government document. I looked at this and say, this was not a random error. [41:46.560 --> 41:48.560] Somebody's not speaking with candor. [41:49.440 --> 41:56.800] I have never seen a statement like that in an appointment before, but the head administrative [41:56.800 --> 42:04.960] judge's district elected to put that in there to mislead me into thinking that this guy was [42:04.960 --> 42:12.000] actually a judge. Yeah, specifically for that purpose, specifically to mislead. Intentionally. [42:14.000 --> 42:19.520] So that I won't object to any standard phrase that they always have in there, copy and paste. [42:19.520 --> 42:25.120] No, he specifically stuck that in there to make you think something that's not true. [42:25.120 --> 42:35.600] To make you think something that's not true. And what does a fraud statement, the causes of action [42:35.600 --> 42:43.360] for fraud, you must, someone must make a statement, a voluntary statement. That statement must be [42:43.360 --> 42:58.960] untrue. The plaintiff must, it must be the intent of the defendant that the statement be taken as [42:58.960 --> 43:06.720] true. And the plaintiff doesn't have equal access to the information to know if it's true or not. [43:06.720 --> 43:16.560] And the plaintiff, the plaintiff must accept the statement as true and make a decision based on the [43:17.520 --> 43:24.080] acceptance that the statement is true and be harmed thereby. That's how you define fraud. [43:25.440 --> 43:35.040] Well, this doesn't meet exactly the elements to sue for fraud, but it does, [43:35.040 --> 43:41.680] it has elements for fraud itself. We'll be right back. Wait a minute. That's 20 seconds. Okay. [43:42.880 --> 43:48.480] It doesn't meet the elements for filing a civil suit for fraud, but for criminal fraud it does. [43:49.440 --> 43:56.400] He doesn't have to complete, you know, he doesn't have to defraud me. He just has to try to hang [43:56.400 --> 44:02.160] on Randy Fountain. We'll be right back. I love Logos. Without the shows on this network, [44:02.160 --> 44:06.640] I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going [44:06.640 --> 44:12.240] back. I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without Logos and I really want to help keep this network [44:12.240 --> 44:16.000] on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I [44:16.000 --> 44:21.600] really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help Logos? [44:21.600 --> 44:26.640] Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos. [44:26.640 --> 44:32.080] When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, first thing you do is clear your cookies. Now go to [44:32.080 --> 44:38.720] LogosRadioNetwork.com. Pick on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now when you order anything from [44:38.720 --> 44:45.040] Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do [44:45.040 --> 44:51.920] anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving without [44:51.920 --> 44:57.920] doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are welcome. [44:57.920 --> 45:04.960] Happy holidays, Logos. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without [45:04.960 --> 45:11.360] an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, four CD course that will show [45:11.360 --> 45:18.880] you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:18.880 --> 45:24.480] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step [45:24.480 --> 45:31.920] by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years [45:31.920 --> 45:37.920] of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should [45:37.920 --> 45:43.680] understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive [45:43.680 --> 45:51.360] our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much [45:51.360 --> 46:14.800] more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EASY. [46:21.360 --> 46:37.440] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking about [46:38.160 --> 46:44.800] setting them up and taking them on. So the second hearing, they wanted me to come down [46:44.800 --> 46:49.600] to Victoria County and drive 400 miles down there. They didn't want to have another one of these [46:49.600 --> 46:58.160] zoom hearings where I had 36 people listening. Yeah, that's a little too out in public for them. [46:58.160 --> 47:04.160] They wanted to be able to keep it quiet. So they make me come down to their court. That was a [47:04.160 --> 47:10.000] mistake. Okay, here's what I did. When I first went down there, I went to the district clerk [47:10.000 --> 47:15.120] and looked in the district clerk's records for a 1617 order and I didn't find one. [47:15.120 --> 47:19.680] So I talked to the district clerk and she was really a sweetheart. You know, generally the [47:19.680 --> 47:25.760] clerks are. The clerks don't have a dog in this hunt. You know, they're just there to handle [47:26.320 --> 47:33.440] the records. And I told her that I had looked in your records and I don't find a 1617 order. [47:33.440 --> 47:40.480] And I explained to her what it was and showed her the code. How do you create a criminal case [47:40.480 --> 47:47.120] without any criminal complaint in your records? [47:50.720 --> 47:54.160] And she said, well, this is just how we do it. Yeah, I see how you do it. But [47:55.520 --> 48:01.200] I told her about 17 points for you commanding the magistrate to seal all the documents in an [48:01.200 --> 48:06.960] envelope, cause his name to be written across the seal of the envelope and send it to you. [48:06.960 --> 48:12.080] Well, we don't get those. Yeah, I know you don't get those. So that means that every case that you [48:12.080 --> 48:22.800] have in your files for every case, the accused shall be discharged by law. So it was my intent. [48:22.800 --> 48:30.800] And I gave her a document with my 1617 order argument on it. And she did exactly what I wanted, [48:30.800 --> 48:34.320] apparently gave it to somebody with more knowledge, probably the district attorney. [48:34.320 --> 48:39.040] And when I came back to Victoria County, I looked in the record and lo and behold, [48:39.840 --> 48:45.600] there was an order from the justice or the judge, excuse me, JP, [48:47.920 --> 48:54.000] from the JP. I forgot, I've been taking an allergy pill and it's helped my coughing considerable, [48:54.000 --> 48:55.600] but I forgot to take it this morning. [48:55.600 --> 49:01.200] I just took it a few minutes ago. So I'm having a little scratchy throat and we don't, there's a, [49:01.200 --> 49:06.240] there's a little, little cough button that you, most radio shows have, but we couldn't [49:06.240 --> 49:12.080] afford it. It's pretty expensive. It cuts your mic on and off. Well, if you try, if I try to [49:12.080 --> 49:18.080] shut this mic off, I generally get a click, pretty loud click. So there's a special button that has a [49:18.080 --> 49:23.760] bunch of capacitors in them. So I'm going to go ahead and turn it off. I'm going to turn it on. [49:23.760 --> 49:29.120] That has a bunch of capacitors and absorbs that click. Anyway, don't have one. I'll deal with it. [49:29.920 --> 49:35.760] I'll go ahead and turn the phone lines on, call it number 512-646-1984. [49:39.200 --> 49:48.320] Okay. So I found an order in the record. And since I was down there, I said, well, [49:48.320 --> 49:54.800] let's see how he did that because there's only one judge in Victoria County that does these kinds of [49:54.800 --> 50:03.600] hearings. So I went and sat in on the hearing. The judge was not a happy camper because I had [50:03.600 --> 50:10.800] just sued him and watched what he was doing. Well, they brought the guy up on the camera [50:10.800 --> 50:20.320] and the judge said, I have read the pleadings by the, I've read the complaint and the [50:23.040 --> 50:28.080] statement by the arresting officer and I find probable cause. [50:30.560 --> 50:33.760] Brett, what's wrong with that story? [50:33.760 --> 50:39.520] Well, the only time he would be able to make the determination of probable cause [50:41.440 --> 50:47.200] and do it according to the due process of law that's laid out would be in the examining trial, [50:47.200 --> 50:52.560] which involves in the presence of the accused and which involves the accused being able to cross [50:52.560 --> 50:59.440] examine the witnesses. How does he do that all by himself just in some closed room somewhere with [50:59.440 --> 51:06.560] nothing to look at, nobody to talk to. One more, there's more damning. Before any evidence can be [51:06.560 --> 51:12.240] entered into the court against the accused, the accused must be accorded an opportunity to make [51:12.240 --> 51:23.440] a statement. 1603 and 04 addresses that. So he looked at evidence, apparently after the accused [51:23.440 --> 51:30.960] was given an opportunity to make a statement, but there's no evidence of that. So it appears. [51:31.840 --> 51:32.880] Was the accused there? [51:34.080 --> 51:41.520] Well, what I contemplated was that the sheriff, that they arrested this person instead of taking [51:41.520 --> 51:48.160] him to a magistrate, took him to jail. The sheriff sequestered them in the jail and secreted [51:48.160 --> 51:56.080] them from an examining trial held by an ex parte examining trial held by the justice [51:56.720 --> 52:03.840] of the peace and the arresting officer. They made a determination of probable cause. [52:04.640 --> 52:11.040] Oh, that's an interesting mental image. Yeah. Well, then that puts like, how did you do this? [52:11.040 --> 52:20.800] And that's not all. While I found the finding probable cause statement in the records, [52:21.600 --> 52:28.560] I didn't find a signed envelope. I didn't find the complaint by the officer or the [52:29.520 --> 52:35.920] statement by the officer. Those weren't in there. And that's a problem because if they held an [52:35.920 --> 52:44.560] examining trial, 17.3 zero orders the judge after the examining trial shall seal all documents had [52:44.560 --> 52:51.600] in the hearing. The statement of the complaint, the statement of the complaining witness and all [52:51.600 --> 52:58.960] other documents shall be sealed up in an envelope with the name of the magistrate written across the [52:58.960 --> 53:06.720] seal of the envelope. How hard is that to understand? And ordered to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction. [53:07.440 --> 53:15.200] Where are those papers? Somebody has them. So I sent an information request to the prosecuting [53:15.200 --> 53:22.400] attorney, the district attorney, and I got a record request, a response to that saying we have no, [53:22.400 --> 53:30.240] well, I asked for all records specifically referenced by 17.30. I expected to see an envelope [53:31.200 --> 53:37.920] with the signature across the envelope. Well, they told me they had no records responsive to [53:37.920 --> 53:46.080] my request. The district clerk had no records responsive to my request. So the request to the [53:46.080 --> 53:52.960] justice of the peace, he had no records responsive to my request. So my goodness, where could they be? [53:55.200 --> 53:57.440] Is it possible that the sheriff still has them? [53:59.680 --> 54:04.480] Is it possible that the accuser communicated with the magistrate via ESP? [54:05.120 --> 54:13.200] Yeah, I believe in that. So when they forced me to come down there, the first thing I did is [54:13.200 --> 54:20.240] hand some criminal complaints to the judge. And he said, what are these? I said, those are [54:20.240 --> 54:25.280] criminal affidavits. They're not verified, but I need your clerk to swear me in and I'll swear [54:25.280 --> 54:32.880] to each one of them. And she's authorized to verify my affirmation. Well, Mr. Kelton, I'm only [54:32.880 --> 54:42.720] appointed to hear this civil case. Say, well, you're appointed as a county judge. And as such, [54:42.720 --> 54:50.720] you are necessarily a magistrate. Therefore you have a duty under 15.09 to issue warrants [54:51.280 --> 54:59.280] on these complaints. Now, he should have got the irony of that. If he was here to hear this case [54:59.280 --> 55:04.800] and he actually read it, because that is precisely what I sued Judge Whitaker for doing. [55:06.320 --> 55:09.280] And Judge Whitaker got to watch me and he said in the courtroom, [55:09.280 --> 55:16.480] due to the judge, what I did to him that got him in that courtroom. So apparently the judge missed [55:16.480 --> 55:24.080] the irony of that and refused to take the complaints. And then he wouldn't, I had told him [55:24.080 --> 55:28.800] I had some motions before the court. Well, I'm only here to hear this challenge subject matter [55:28.800 --> 55:35.600] jurisdiction. And the other sides argued that the judge had qualified immunity. And I argued that [55:35.600 --> 55:41.040] the challenge subject matter jurisdiction was filed as a challenge subject matter jurisdiction [55:41.040 --> 55:48.480] and answer. It challenged an issue that's not before the court. It claimed that the judge had [55:48.480 --> 55:54.240] qualified immunity from suit. Well, I didn't sue the judge in his official capacity. [55:55.280 --> 56:01.680] I sued him in his personal capacity for making a, for failing to perform the ministerial duty. [56:01.680 --> 56:09.600] And that's a situation where the judge has no immunity. He's acting in his personal capacity. [56:10.640 --> 56:19.280] But defense counsel did not argue that issue. They didn't oppose a suit in personal capacity. [56:21.120 --> 56:27.440] They argued the wrong issue. So a suit is not what you name it. It is what it is. And since it [56:27.440 --> 56:32.480] didn't address the issue before the court, then it can't be construed as a challenge subject matter [56:32.480 --> 56:40.720] jurisdiction, but also said an answer. So we must construe it as an answer. Problem wasn't verified. [56:41.680 --> 56:45.120] On a subject matter jurisdiction challenge does not have to be verified. [56:45.120 --> 56:56.080] A answer does. So while this motion is resting in the record and it is before you, you can't see it [56:57.040 --> 57:05.760] because it is not properly filed. He just ruled against me. So I reminded the court of Walker v [57:05.760 --> 57:15.840] Packer and Walker v Packer. It says that a judge has no discretion in properly applying the law [57:15.840 --> 57:23.040] to the facts. And when I said that his mouth dropped open, his eyes dilated. He just shifted [57:23.040 --> 57:32.160] into a different gear. A failure to do so is an abusive discretion and an abusive discretion that [57:32.160 --> 57:37.840] has the effect of denying me in the form of free access to or enjoyment of a riot is a class A [57:37.840 --> 57:46.080] misdemeanor violation of 39.03 penal code. Now turn to the bailiff. Mr. Bailiff, arrest that judge. [57:47.760 --> 57:54.560] You could have heard a pin drop. Mr. Bailiff, you're standing mute. [57:54.560 --> 58:01.600] Mr. Bailiff, you're standing mute. Arrest that judge. I'm pretty sure they haven't heard anything [58:01.600 --> 58:07.440] like that happen before. When you start saying things that sound like they came out of the mouth [58:07.440 --> 58:13.840] of a judge instead of saying things that, you know, branding and raising about how much rights you [58:13.840 --> 58:18.880] have and all of that. But you just start saying things that sound like they came straight out of [58:18.880 --> 58:28.640] a code because you've read it. They were straight out of the code. So now I'll go back and file the [58:28.640 --> 58:36.400] exact same criminal charges against him that I filed against Whitaker, plus a whole bunch more. [58:36.400 --> 58:41.600] You want to call me down there, bubba? We'll see how this works out for you. And it gets better. [58:41.600 --> 58:49.840] Ready to count on Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio. We'll be right back. [58:49.840 --> 58:55.440] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated [58:55.440 --> 59:01.440] because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, [59:01.440 --> 59:07.920] but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. Enter the recovery [59:07.920 --> 59:14.320] version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the [59:14.320 --> 59:21.280] more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous [59:21.280 --> 59:26.960] way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:27.600 --> 59:32.320] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:32.320 --> 59:42.880] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 [59:42.880 --> 59:49.520] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. [59:49.520 --> 59:58.560] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [59:58.560 --> 01:00:05.120] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our constitution. [01:00:05.120 --> 01:00:10.080] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on [01:00:10.080 --> 01:00:14.640] it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of [01:00:14.640 --> 01:00:20.800] your constitutional rights. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, [01:00:20.800 --> 01:00:25.840] you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will [01:00:25.840 --> 01:00:31.520] start to vanish, too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information [01:00:31.520 --> 01:00:36.800] to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to [01:00:36.800 --> 01:00:43.600] you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over [01:00:43.600 --> 01:00:50.080] with Startpage. Most people think of seven as a more civilized number than six. Think about the [01:00:50.080 --> 01:00:55.760] number six as implicated in evil, as in the biblical 666. So it would fit right in that the [01:00:55.760 --> 01:01:01.520] Seventh Amendment would be about civil trials. Civil seven, civil trials, get it? Civil trials [01:01:01.520 --> 01:01:06.000] are ones where people sue instead of beating each other up over a dispute, like the dividing line [01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:10.640] between properties. They take their dispute to a courthouse and settle matters civilly without [01:01:10.640 --> 01:01:15.680] the fisticuffs. The Seventh Amendment guarantees that Americans have the right to a jury in certain [01:01:15.680 --> 01:01:20.960] civil matters instead of having a lone judge rule on the case. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:01:20.960 --> 01:01:34.160] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments [01:01:34.160 --> 01:01:39.200] of our Constitution. They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:01:39.200 --> 01:01:43.200] Our liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an [01:01:43.200 --> 01:01:49.200] unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. Privacy is under attack. [01:01:49.200 --> 01:01:54.640] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, [01:01:54.640 --> 01:02:00.560] you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance [01:02:00.560 --> 01:02:06.320] and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service [01:02:06.320 --> 01:02:11.600] announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, [01:02:11.600 --> 01:02:18.720] Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. Remember the scene in George Orwell's novel [01:02:18.720 --> 01:02:24.880] 1984 when Winston is threatened with his worst fear? That fear was having a cage of hungry rats [01:02:24.880 --> 01:02:30.320] unleashed on his face. But what if his worst fear was spiders? Eight-legged spiders, to be exact. [01:02:30.320 --> 01:02:34.960] Getting a face full of spiders would be pretty cruel and unusual. That image of eight-legged [01:02:34.960 --> 01:02:38.880] spiders will help you remember the Eighth Amendment. Our founding fathers added the [01:02:38.880 --> 01:02:44.080] Eighth Amendment to the US Constitution to protect us from creepy-crawly eight-legged punishments [01:02:44.080 --> 01:02:49.200] and other cruel and unusual prison practices that were common in their day. The Eighth Amendment also [01:02:49.200 --> 01:02:54.560] prohibits the government from requiring excessive bail and charging excessive fines. I'm Dr. [01:02:54.560 --> 01:03:10.000] Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:03:24.560 --> 01:03:42.800] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. [01:03:44.160 --> 01:03:51.360] And what I'm planning is if we're going to take them on, and you know, I tell people the best [01:03:51.360 --> 01:04:00.880] fight to have is the one you picked. Well, I picked this fight. These lawyers filed this response [01:04:00.880 --> 01:04:07.760] and did a really bad job. So I bar-grieved both of them. Well, what I bar-grieved them for was in [01:04:07.760 --> 01:04:15.520] this first Zoom hearing, the lead attorney was a young kid, and the old attorney was sitting [01:04:15.520 --> 01:04:23.120] behind him. They always give the pro se litigants to the young kids, the new attorneys. While I'm [01:04:23.120 --> 01:04:30.640] working over this judge, he breaks in and asks to speak, you know, interrupted what we were doing. [01:04:31.520 --> 01:04:37.120] And the judge asked him, well, what do you have to contribute? Well, Your Honor, I just wanted to [01:04:38.400 --> 01:04:44.560] advise Mr. Kelton that if he strikes you as a judge, he only has one strike, and he can't [01:04:44.560 --> 01:04:52.080] strike the next one. Well, I really appreciated that unsolicited advice, and I would have appreciated [01:04:52.080 --> 01:05:01.680] it more if it was correct. It's too bad it was flawed. It's bad legal advice, unsolicited, [01:05:01.680 --> 01:05:09.840] and bad. So I bar-grieved the lead attorney for not correcting the interloper, and I didn't [01:05:09.840 --> 01:05:17.440] really know who the interloper was. He said his name was Cullen, and the law firm was named Cullen. [01:05:17.440 --> 01:05:28.160] So I went to their website, and I found Papa Cullen, Mama Cullen, and Baby Cullen. So who do [01:05:28.160 --> 01:05:36.400] I bar-grieve? Sometimes you can't be too sure about those boy and girl names anymore, so you [01:05:36.400 --> 01:05:41.520] might as well just cover all your bases. Yeah, well, I didn't want to bar-grieve them all for [01:05:42.240 --> 01:05:49.520] one dead, so I assumed this had to be Baby Cullen, because Papa Cullen was too old and sophisticated [01:05:49.520 --> 01:05:59.440] to do something stupid like that, so I bar-grieved Baby Cullen. When I went back down there, Papa [01:05:59.440 --> 01:06:12.560] Cullen was in the courtroom, not Baby Cullen. Oh my goodness, I bar-grieved the wrong one. My bad. [01:06:14.400 --> 01:06:22.160] But these guys were up on their tippy toes. They could not have been nicer to me. Even when I was [01:06:22.160 --> 01:06:31.120] talking to his client, he waited about five minutes before he said, well, you know, we really shouldn't [01:06:31.120 --> 01:06:39.040] be talking to each other, and I didn't take that up with him, saying, you know, you can't, he [01:06:39.040 --> 01:06:44.080] shouldn't be talking to me. They should talk through you, but me? I'm talking about it, I want to, [01:06:44.720 --> 01:06:49.360] because I didn't agree not to talk the opposing side, and I told the judge, I'm not after you, [01:06:49.360 --> 01:06:55.680] Judge. I'm just trying to get him to follow code, and that's when he told me he understood that, [01:06:56.400 --> 01:07:03.600] and the lawyer said, that's what I told Judge Whitaker, that I was just trying to, you know, [01:07:05.520 --> 01:07:14.640] get him to follow law, that I wasn't after him personally, and the judge stood there and listened. [01:07:14.640 --> 01:07:21.440] I had his attention, and that was my purpose. So he's going to want to do it right. Now I have to [01:07:21.440 --> 01:07:28.160] file five more criminal complaints against him. I have no doubt that he's going to go to the prosecutor [01:07:28.160 --> 01:07:32.320] and say, you got to do something. This guy just filed another stack of criminal complaints against [01:07:32.320 --> 01:07:40.080] me. So what I expect is when I go back down there, they will have changed their policies again. [01:07:40.080 --> 01:07:43.600] Maybe, maybe not, but I suspect they're going to try to change the policies, [01:07:44.640 --> 01:07:50.480] and it will be very inconvenient for them, because now they're taking the people to jail, [01:07:50.480 --> 01:07:57.040] holding them overnight, and now the officer will have to come in the next morning and be at this [01:07:57.040 --> 01:08:03.520] examining trial, and when they do that, if they do it that way, what should I do, Brett? [01:08:03.520 --> 01:08:11.120] And when they do that, if they do it that way, what should I do, Brett? Should I say, oh, wonderful. [01:08:15.920 --> 01:08:20.560] If they do that, I'll file criminal charges against them again, [01:08:23.840 --> 01:08:31.520] because they arrested them and took them directly to jail, and did not take them directly to a [01:08:31.520 --> 01:08:42.560] magistrate, as commanded by 14.06 and 15.16. 14.06 is arrest for on-site offense, [01:08:44.080 --> 01:08:52.320] 15.16 is arrest for a warrant. Both of them say, well, 14.06 says they're taken directly [01:08:52.320 --> 01:08:59.040] to the nearest magistrate. The warrant says arrest this person and bring him before me. [01:08:59.040 --> 01:09:02.960] The magistrate who issued the warrant. [01:09:04.960 --> 01:09:14.400] So, yeah, I talked with that JP today about this very thing, that the guys that are arresting [01:09:14.400 --> 01:09:18.880] somebody have no business taking them to jail. There's no authority given for that. You, [01:09:18.880 --> 01:09:24.880] I pointed my finger at him, pointed at his chest, and I said, you have the key to that jailhouse [01:09:24.880 --> 01:09:33.920] door. They don't. Perfect. So I'm going to file criminal charges against them again. [01:09:35.600 --> 01:09:43.360] I do expect to find the records in the hands of the county clerk, like they're supposed to be. [01:09:44.880 --> 01:09:50.000] We may actually be able to force this county to do it right. [01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:59.120] And for me, that would be a gigantic win. But they still don't have, they don't have a clue [01:09:59.120 --> 01:10:10.640] as to what's coming at them. This is just a warm-up, guys. If they're listening, I'm just [01:10:10.640 --> 01:10:18.960] getting warmed up on you. This is the sideshow. We will work our way up to the end of the year. [01:10:18.960 --> 01:10:27.520] Work our way up to the real deal. They already know I'm setting them up for a federal RICO suit. [01:10:28.320 --> 01:10:32.800] I told the constable, I really gave him a hard time and he handled me really well. [01:10:33.440 --> 01:10:37.520] Never lost his cool. I told him, you know, don't worry, I'm not after you. I'm sorry I have to [01:10:37.520 --> 01:10:47.600] give you a hard time, but I have to touch all the bases. I'm preparing for a RICO suit in the Fed, [01:10:47.600 --> 01:10:52.320] but before I get there, I have to make sure I've touched all the bases and I'm sure he ran and told [01:10:52.320 --> 01:10:58.160] everybody that. So they know they got this guy set them up so he can take them to the Fed for a [01:10:58.160 --> 01:11:05.680] Frederico suit. But, and I'm walking all over them and there's nothing they can do about it. [01:11:08.160 --> 01:11:14.400] If you got to have a legal fight, the best fight to have is the one you pick. Don't wait till they [01:11:14.400 --> 01:11:19.440] drag you into court and start beating you up. Go down there and beat them up first. [01:11:21.200 --> 01:11:28.000] Then you'll be like Brett. They'll pull in behind you, run your plates and all of a sudden they got [01:11:28.640 --> 01:11:35.600] a craving for coffee and donuts. Okay, that's kind of, that's basically where I'm at. That's [01:11:35.600 --> 01:11:42.000] about as far as I want to talk about on the air so far because good chance they've got someone [01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:48.480] listening. Or we may even have someone on our telegram site who's downloading the recording [01:11:48.480 --> 01:11:52.560] so all of them can listen to it. Well, that's all I'm going to give them for the time being. [01:11:53.440 --> 01:12:00.080] As we move along, I have some plans coming that I don't want to reveal on here [01:12:01.200 --> 01:12:09.200] because I want it to be a pleasant surprise for them. Yeah. Okay. Well, we do have a couple of [01:12:09.200 --> 01:12:14.160] collars lining up there. Don't know why it's not completely full, but we have a couple. [01:12:15.360 --> 01:12:20.960] Okay. We're going to go to Joe in Canada. Hello, Canuck. [01:12:26.560 --> 01:12:28.400] What do you have for us today? [01:12:28.400 --> 01:12:40.960] Can you hear me? Yeah. Yes, we can. Yes. Okay. Hey, I was in court this week. Now what I'm doing is [01:12:40.960 --> 01:12:47.360] I'm suing my ex for a breach of an agreement. We had an agreement that we were going to share [01:12:47.360 --> 01:12:59.360] our daughter 50 and she violated that agreement and I'm suing her. Now, while during the proceeding, [01:13:01.600 --> 01:13:09.920] I guess I'm skipping a step here. When I filed the claim, my ex responded in her defense and her [01:13:09.920 --> 01:13:17.600] defense was all based on family court and my criminal charges, my criminal history, all that. [01:13:18.320 --> 01:13:23.520] So what I did is I filed a motion to strike her defense because she was in the wrong case. [01:13:25.360 --> 01:13:34.160] When I went to court, the judge threw my motion to strike her defense and what he told me was that [01:13:34.160 --> 01:13:43.680] agreements aren't binding in law. Now, in my motion, I provided him with I think a free case [01:13:43.680 --> 01:13:50.800] law that stated that agreements were binding. Now, am I able to- Wait a minute. Agreements [01:13:50.800 --> 01:13:59.440] are contracts. Did anything of value change hands? Did your spouse, after the verbal agreement, [01:13:59.440 --> 01:14:05.040] take an action in furtherance of the contract? [01:14:09.840 --> 01:14:11.520] Take the daughter for a week or something? [01:14:16.080 --> 01:14:24.640] Yeah. Okay. This is a verbal contract. Before the last oil spill, the one in the Gulf, [01:14:24.640 --> 01:14:34.880] the largest verdict ever was based on a verbal agreement. [01:14:36.240 --> 01:14:44.960] I think it was Exxon and JP Getty. They had a verbal agreement. Exxon violated. JP Getty sued [01:14:44.960 --> 01:14:50.880] and won the largest verdict ever in US history on a verbal contract. [01:14:50.880 --> 01:15:04.320] So, findings of facts and conclusions at law. Have you looked for something similar to Walker [01:15:04.320 --> 01:15:10.080] D. Packer? Walker D. Packer? [01:15:10.800 --> 01:15:18.720] Yes. What it says is, and I quoted this recently and earlier on the show, a judge has no discretion [01:15:18.720 --> 01:15:26.640] in properly applying the law to the facts. The judge's only job or primary job in the courtroom, [01:15:26.640 --> 01:15:32.480] he has other things he does, but all the other things he does is in order to support this [01:15:32.480 --> 01:15:39.440] particular duty. He is to determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence, [01:15:40.560 --> 01:15:44.720] then apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case. [01:15:44.720 --> 01:15:50.720] If he fails to do so, he's at his discretion. And Walker D. Packer goes on to say the only [01:15:50.720 --> 01:15:59.920] thing you can appeal is an abuse of discretion. So, every appeal has to go to the judge failing [01:15:59.920 --> 01:16:08.480] to properly apply the law to the facts. So, here is a case where someone can drag out [01:16:08.480 --> 01:16:17.600] the Uniform Commercial Code. I think you do have a version of that in Canada. Pull it out. [01:16:19.200 --> 01:16:25.360] And this, normally we get real testy when someone starts bringing up UCC, [01:16:25.360 --> 01:16:32.480] but this is a contract issue. So, file a motion for reconsideration first, [01:16:32.480 --> 01:16:38.000] then file a request for findings of facts and conclusions of law, and include one. [01:16:38.720 --> 01:16:45.200] And ask the judge to accept yours or prepare his own as you need these findings in order [01:16:45.200 --> 01:16:52.240] to be able to have grounds for appeal. He'll deny it, of course, but that'll protect you. [01:16:52.240 --> 01:16:53.600] Hang on, we'll be right back. [01:16:53.600 --> 01:16:58.960] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word? [01:16:58.960 --> 01:17:04.160] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for [01:17:04.160 --> 01:17:10.080] Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [01:17:10.720 --> 01:17:15.040] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, [01:17:15.040 --> 01:17:24.080] rightly dividing the Word of Truth. Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book [01:17:24.080 --> 01:17:28.960] of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. Our second [01:17:28.960 --> 01:17:34.000] hour topical studies will vary each week, with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian [01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:39.040] character development. We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a [01:17:39.040 --> 01:17:43.840] hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into [01:17:43.840 --> 01:17:50.160] the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com [01:17:50.160 --> 01:17:55.600] on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [01:17:57.120 --> 01:18:03.120] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [01:18:03.120 --> 01:18:05.680] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. [01:18:05.680 --> 01:18:11.280] And it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic [01:18:11.280 --> 01:18:16.320] environment is good nutrition. In a world where natural fruits have been irradiated, [01:18:16.320 --> 01:18:22.800] adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevety can provide the nutrients you need. LogosRadioNetwork [01:18:22.800 --> 01:18:28.160] gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have [01:18:28.160 --> 01:18:33.200] come to trust Young Jevety so much, we became a marketing platform for our young people. [01:18:33.200 --> 01:18:40.240] We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When [01:18:40.240 --> 01:18:47.600] you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [01:18:47.600 --> 01:18:53.120] As you realize the benefits of Young Jevety, you may want to join us. As a distributor, [01:18:53.120 --> 01:18:59.520] you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order [01:18:59.520 --> 01:19:06.560] now. This is the LogosRadioNetwork. [01:19:29.520 --> 01:19:49.040] Okay, we are back and we're talking to Joe in Canada. So, I kind of bushwhacked you there. [01:19:50.080 --> 01:19:51.600] What have you done at this point? [01:19:54.240 --> 01:19:58.480] Well, this is my first time. This is my first time going. Now, here's the thing. You just said to [01:19:58.480 --> 01:20:07.040] file a motion for reconsideration. But they tried to nail me with $1,000 for court fees [01:20:07.040 --> 01:20:13.360] for filing my motion to strike or defense. And it ended up only costing me $100 right now. [01:20:14.640 --> 01:20:21.280] What I think is going on is, it's like I told you before, I believe I'm getting to be well-known [01:20:21.280 --> 01:20:25.680] within the courts. And I think they're just trying to give me a hard time in every way, [01:20:25.680 --> 01:20:32.720] shape or form they can. Good, good, good. That's good. They're trying to do that to me too. [01:20:33.760 --> 01:20:36.960] Every time they try something like that, I wind up hammering them. [01:20:38.800 --> 01:20:43.760] It's kind of common for them to start with that approach before they figure out it's going to [01:20:43.760 --> 01:20:47.760] hurt them more than it hurts you. And then they decide that they don't really want to play anymore. [01:20:47.760 --> 01:20:58.080] Yeah. Well, that's, I'm anxious to get to that point. Now, would I be better off filing an [01:20:58.080 --> 01:21:04.160] interlocutory appeal for his, basically his legal determination on- [01:21:04.160 --> 01:21:07.520] You'll get to that. You're not there yet. [01:21:08.960 --> 01:21:15.920] First, you have to make sure you can appeal. You don't know why the judge ruled how he ruled. So [01:21:15.920 --> 01:21:23.040] you can't say that he didn't rule correctly because you don't have the findings of fact [01:21:23.040 --> 01:21:31.920] and conclusions at law on which to base an appeal. So ask him for it. And when you file that, [01:21:32.560 --> 01:21:41.040] it stops the clock, stops your appellate clock. The motion for reconsideration is easy to write. [01:21:41.040 --> 01:21:46.960] You get it in and it stops the clock. They will dismiss it out of hand, but that resets that. [01:21:46.960 --> 01:21:56.640] We have a 15 day, a 10 day appellate clock. So motion for reconsideration stops that clock [01:21:58.560 --> 01:22:02.560] is another 10 days. And then you file for findings. When he denies it, [01:22:02.560 --> 01:22:09.040] you file for findings of fact and conclusions at law. And he'll refuse to do that. And by then [01:22:09.040 --> 01:22:18.880] you should have a interlocutory appeal. Wait a minute. Were there other issues before the court? [01:22:21.600 --> 01:22:22.480] In that matter? [01:22:23.440 --> 01:22:23.680] Yes. [01:22:24.320 --> 01:22:28.160] No, it was just a breach of the contract, but the- [01:22:28.160 --> 01:22:31.680] Oh, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Okay. What I'm trying to get at is [01:22:31.680 --> 01:22:41.360] if this is a dispositive ruling, then you have to appeal. You can't do an interlocutory because [01:22:42.320 --> 01:22:44.560] it's a final decision. [01:22:47.760 --> 01:22:53.040] No, it's still not thrown out. I believe the next time I go to court though, they are going [01:22:53.040 --> 01:22:57.520] to throw it because they said that my claim was frivolous because I don't have a cause of action. [01:22:57.520 --> 01:23:02.400] They said a breach of agreement is not a cause of action. [01:23:02.400 --> 01:23:08.800] Then file an amended pleading and claim a breach of contract law, UCC. [01:23:10.720 --> 01:23:14.240] It's crazy that they would say breach of agreement is not a cause of action. [01:23:16.560 --> 01:23:21.440] I know it just, this matter was so simple. It should have just been in and out of court [01:23:21.440 --> 01:23:25.440] very, very easy. And that's what I told the judge. I was like, the only thing that you got to base [01:23:25.440 --> 01:23:29.600] this on is was there an agreement and was there a breach of agreement? [01:23:30.240 --> 01:23:36.000] It was really that simple. And my documents were very, very simple and straightforward. [01:23:37.360 --> 01:23:40.720] Well, maybe they need to be a little less simple and cover more bases. [01:23:42.240 --> 01:23:50.080] So the other thing, Randy, you might consider filing amended. Start this all over again. [01:23:50.080 --> 01:23:56.480] File what? Wait a minute. No. [01:23:56.480 --> 01:24:01.200] Yeah. Okay. If it's not a positive motion, you can file an amended pleading. [01:24:03.440 --> 01:24:10.400] Wait a minute. I don't have enough. He ruled that your only claim [01:24:12.400 --> 01:24:16.560] was it's what he just ruled against. [01:24:16.560 --> 01:24:21.920] Why are you having another hearing? This should be over. [01:24:23.600 --> 01:24:29.920] Because it was a motion to strike her defense. And I was demanding for an immediate judgment. [01:24:30.560 --> 01:24:39.120] So what he did is he threw out my motion, but my claim is still in the court. And he told her lawyer [01:24:39.120 --> 01:24:46.480] that he's not dismissing my claim because the lawyer never made an application to dismiss my claim. [01:24:47.120 --> 01:24:52.720] Right. It wasn't before the court. So he's telling this guy file a motion to dismiss and I'll grant [01:24:52.720 --> 01:25:01.920] it. So what you should do at this point is first off file and start preparing an amended pleading, [01:25:01.920 --> 01:25:08.240] but file a motion for reconsideration and put in that motion for reconsideration. The argument [01:25:08.240 --> 01:25:17.200] in the argument as to the fact that this is a contractual agreement and you obviously have [01:25:17.840 --> 01:25:25.760] contract law in Canada. I think everybody in Canada is so nice to each other they don't need it. [01:25:27.920 --> 01:25:36.640] Okay. Maybe not, but write a brief. You write your first brief on contract law. [01:25:36.640 --> 01:25:44.560] Make your argument out of contract law and file that with a motion for reconsideration. [01:25:47.360 --> 01:25:55.680] And he'll deny it. But then you take that and rewrite it as an appeal. Then you file that as [01:25:55.680 --> 01:26:04.800] an interlocutory. And that stops the clock again. So they can't get to the final hearing. So they [01:26:04.800 --> 01:26:13.920] blow you off. Okay. Does that make sense? So far, yes. Now also the defendant filed [01:26:15.520 --> 01:26:20.960] in her affidavit, she gave false statements of material fact. Now I brought that up in [01:26:22.160 --> 01:26:26.000] in an affidavit that I sent in and they completely ignored that fact. [01:26:27.040 --> 01:26:33.440] Okay. Take that affidavit and turn it into a verified criminal affidavit and file it [01:26:33.440 --> 01:26:43.840] too. How do criminal complaints get filed in Canada? Okay. Let me explain why I asked that [01:26:43.840 --> 01:26:51.600] question that way. In Texas and in the United States, a complaint is all complaints are directed [01:26:51.600 --> 01:26:59.360] to some magistrate, not to the prosecuting attorney, not to the police, but some magistrate [01:26:59.360 --> 01:27:09.840] and all judges are magistrates. What does Canada say about how a criminal charge gets initiated? [01:27:12.880 --> 01:27:18.800] I'm not too sure on that one. Because right now I am filing a private prosecution, [01:27:18.800 --> 01:27:27.680] but I think that's different. That is different. And filing a criminal affidavit into a civil case [01:27:27.680 --> 01:27:36.240] may or may not be allowed in Canada. What I did in this hearing, I just spoke to [01:27:37.120 --> 01:27:46.240] before the hearing was commenced. I gave these complaints to the judge. The judge is just sitting [01:27:46.240 --> 01:27:53.600] there. He's not, he doesn't have a hearing in the works. So he's not doing anything yet. [01:27:53.600 --> 01:28:00.560] So he's just a magistrate. He's a county judge, but he's also a magistrate. And the county judge [01:28:00.560 --> 01:28:04.640] is not busy. So you invoke his duty as a magistrate by giving him complaints. [01:28:07.120 --> 01:28:11.920] I told the senior district judge for Travis County, when I did that to him, he said that [01:28:11.920 --> 01:28:17.360] senior district judges don't take criminal complaints in Travis County. I said, well, [01:28:17.360 --> 01:28:22.480] your honor, I'm not here to invoke your duty as a district judge. I'm here to invoke your duty [01:28:22.480 --> 01:28:28.640] as a magistrate. And that's a duty from which you may not shield yourself. He looked over at the [01:28:28.640 --> 01:28:34.400] bailiff and looked back at me and I know what he was thinking. If I have my bailiff, shoot this guy. [01:28:34.400 --> 01:28:50.560] Okay. Check the law on that. Read the criminal procedure code on how a complaint is initiated. [01:28:55.200 --> 01:29:01.200] Okay. If the judge is a magistrate, you go in before hearing commences, [01:29:01.200 --> 01:29:06.240] you tell the judge, this is one of my favorite statements. I have business with the court that [01:29:06.240 --> 01:29:12.400] supersedes any business now before the court. I have some documents. May I approach? And generally [01:29:12.400 --> 01:29:19.200] they'll send the bailiff to get them, put it in a sealed envelope. And what the judge may do is [01:29:19.200 --> 01:29:25.040] ask what the business is. To have the business in these documents. May I present them to the court? [01:29:25.040 --> 01:29:30.480] And if he insists on knowing what it is, your honor, I am here by these verified criminal [01:29:30.480 --> 01:29:25.040] affidavits invoking your duty as an [01:29:25.040 --> 01:29:30.400] a magistrate. Now, if he refuses, now you get criminal charges against him. [01:29:32.400 --> 01:29:41.520] Then you ask the bailiff to arrest him. That's pretty fun. Okay, hang on. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, [01:29:41.520 --> 01:29:58.480] the Wheel of Law Radio, we'll be right back. [01:30:11.520 --> 01:30:28.480] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment. [01:30:41.920 --> 01:30:49.760] Start over with StartPage. Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects? If so, you might think [01:30:49.760 --> 01:30:56.240] that multitasking proves you're smart. But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain. [01:30:56.240 --> 01:31:01.200] A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons, which actually makes [01:31:01.200 --> 01:31:07.200] it harder for people to manage problems. Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people [01:31:07.200 --> 01:31:35.520] have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex. That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and [01:31:35.520 --> 01:31:50.100] ceased to do it certainly allow us to consider and state what's happening inside our [01:32:01.120 --> 01:32:01.200] clock. [01:32:01.200 --> 01:32:03.440] Then what's happening over time. [01:32:03.440 --> 01:32:07.440] proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. In today's America, we live in an us against [01:32:07.440 --> 01:32:10.880] them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going [01:32:10.880 --> 01:32:14.740] to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to travel [01:32:14.740 --> 01:32:18.520] freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, [01:32:18.520 --> 01:32:22.680] the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity [01:32:22.680 --> 01:32:26.960] to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy [01:32:26.960 --> 01:32:30.600] Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive [01:32:30.600 --> 01:32:34.200] teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to [01:32:34.200 --> 01:32:37.880] hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material [01:32:37.880 --> 01:32:42.240] by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive [01:32:42.240 --> 01:32:46.400] a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio [01:32:46.400 --> 01:32:50.560] of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource [01:32:50.560 --> 01:32:54.480] material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [01:32:54.480 --> 01:33:01.480] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:33:24.480 --> 01:33:31.480] Thank you very much. [01:33:54.480 --> 01:34:01.480] Thank you very much. [01:34:24.480 --> 01:34:40.640] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Joe [01:34:40.640 --> 01:34:45.960] in Canada. Joe, do we have all your issues covered? [01:34:45.960 --> 01:34:52.160] One more quick thing. During the proceeding, I objected twice. The first time I objected, [01:34:52.160 --> 01:34:57.880] he ignored me. The second time I objected, he got mad at me for interrupting the other [01:34:57.880 --> 01:35:01.200] party while they were speaking. So I asked him- [01:35:01.200 --> 01:35:05.760] That should get judicial conduct complaints. Okay, because I asked him, I was like, are [01:35:05.760 --> 01:35:11.040] you claiming that I don't have the right to object in my claim? And he says, oh, I apologize. [01:35:11.040 --> 01:35:13.960] He says, I didn't hear you object. So- [01:35:13.960 --> 01:35:19.080] Oh, that's okay. Well, he backed up. [01:35:19.080 --> 01:35:20.420] What's that? [01:35:20.420 --> 01:35:25.760] He backed up. So you got your objection on the record. [01:35:25.760 --> 01:35:32.640] I did, but if he's claiming that he didn't hear me, then he shouldn't be presiding on [01:35:32.640 --> 01:35:33.640] the bench because- [01:35:33.640 --> 01:35:40.560] No, no, no. You're picking fights you don't want to have. [01:35:40.560 --> 01:35:41.560] Maybe. [01:35:41.560 --> 01:35:48.120] Be careful of the fights you choose. You will have opportunity to fight more battles than [01:35:48.120 --> 01:35:55.640] you could ever get to. Pick your fights real careful. Otherwise, you get so deluded, you [01:35:55.640 --> 01:35:58.640] can't do anything. [01:35:58.640 --> 01:36:05.680] That's a good example. Jane, if you're listening, that's what Jane is doing. She's picking every [01:36:05.680 --> 01:36:09.840] fight she can find and it keeps her scattered and running all over the place like a chicken [01:36:09.840 --> 01:36:17.240] with her head cut off. She can't get focused. Stay with what you're after. That will get [01:36:17.240 --> 01:36:23.200] you nowhere, especially if the judge apologized to you. We all miss something sometimes. [01:36:23.200 --> 01:36:28.160] Yeah, but I know it was done on purpose. That's why. [01:36:28.160 --> 01:36:37.720] Could be, but you called him on it and he apologized on the record. That's pretty good. [01:36:37.720 --> 01:36:40.640] I don't get judges apologizing to their behavior. [01:36:40.640 --> 01:36:41.640] Right. [01:36:41.640 --> 01:36:49.560] To me. Then if you go and try to make a big deal out of that, then that's going to make [01:36:49.560 --> 01:36:55.200] you look bad because he already apologized right there in real time. [01:36:55.200 --> 01:37:00.920] All right, fair enough. All right, that's it for me. Thank you. [01:37:00.920 --> 01:37:07.080] Okay. Thank you, Joe. Now we're going to go to a very special caller I've been waiting [01:37:07.080 --> 01:37:12.160] for. Marty Shea, talk to us. [01:37:12.160 --> 01:37:15.160] Hey, Randy. Hey, Norm, Randy. [01:37:15.160 --> 01:37:17.920] Doing good. You got a story for us. [01:37:17.920 --> 01:37:29.120] Yeah. Well, one story where I helped the individual out with a couple of guns that got taken away. [01:37:29.120 --> 01:37:35.560] Troy was speaking to somebody that was in the gym and then told him what happened to [01:37:35.560 --> 01:37:41.000] him and he started directing him to me. I spoke to him and he was telling me that the [01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:46.520] police officer took this, pulled him over. He had a whole bunch of guns in the car. He [01:37:46.520 --> 01:37:54.240] had a, which he was licensed for. They took the gun. I'm like, what did they take your [01:37:54.240 --> 01:37:57.240] jail for? He said, hey, you take jail for nothing. You're taking guns. I'm like, you [01:37:57.240 --> 01:38:02.840] didn't get back to me? Like, no, they say have a gun. This is almost been nearly two [01:38:02.840 --> 01:38:08.920] years. I said, what? He was like, yeah, you know, he's trying to figure out what to do. [01:38:08.920 --> 01:38:15.040] You want to sue him and all this stuff and all that. Can I teach him how to do it? I'm [01:38:15.040 --> 01:38:23.200] like, man, I would. It's not that easy. It's not that simple. But before we do all that, [01:38:23.200 --> 01:38:29.880] who is this? We were like, oh, this is a Maryland police. I said, Maryland? I just sued them. [01:38:29.880 --> 01:38:35.360] They said, yeah, just sued them. So let's try this first because teaching you is going [01:38:35.360 --> 01:38:44.680] to be a whole other world. One, he's far removed from having the ability to pick all this stuff [01:38:44.680 --> 01:38:55.160] up and digest it and then go perform it. So I was like, look, you go call them, call the [01:38:55.160 --> 01:39:03.880] city attorney and tell him the situation very politely, and then tell him that you want [01:39:03.880 --> 01:39:12.200] your guns returned or you're going to have to partner up with me in order to file suit [01:39:12.200 --> 01:39:23.720] against the city to get his guns back. In my head, I'm just being a bully, but at least [01:39:23.720 --> 01:39:32.320] I got this guy going down the right rabbit hole and give me time to teach him what he [01:39:32.320 --> 01:39:40.800] needs to learn instead of just giving him something to do. So me, even I thought, I'm [01:39:40.800 --> 01:39:50.360] like, man, you are a bully. I knew that I was just asking the trouble. You're just taking [01:39:50.360 --> 01:39:58.240] the fight now. So the guy said, are you sure? I'm like, yeah, just do it. Then they'll tell [01:39:58.240 --> 01:40:05.720] you no, whatever, but at least you contacted the right people. And he said, okay, all right. [01:40:05.720 --> 01:40:13.320] That's where we began first. So he goes there about a week or two later. He calls me out [01:40:13.320 --> 01:40:18.760] and he tells me, he's like, look, I called him up and I suspended to them and the lady [01:40:18.760 --> 01:40:24.760] was just sitting there like, it was the city attorney assistant. She was just sitting there, [01:40:24.760 --> 01:40:30.640] you know, just listening to me, uh-huh, uh-huh, uh-huh. And she was like very nonchalant and [01:40:30.640 --> 01:40:36.280] everything. And then at the end I was like, yeah, I would like my guns returned or I'm [01:40:36.280 --> 01:40:42.880] going to have to partner up with Mr. Olivier in order to file suit. You heard of Mr. Olivier? [01:40:42.880 --> 01:40:50.480] They're like, yeah. And he's like, oh, um, she said that once he said my name, he said [01:40:50.480 --> 01:40:54.840] the whole tone, the whole tone of the conversation changed. [01:40:54.840 --> 01:40:55.840] Okay. [01:40:55.840 --> 01:41:00.960] They started seeing their life flash before their eyes. [01:41:00.960 --> 01:41:11.240] No, no, no. That's not what it was. She checked her Christmas list and your name was on it. [01:41:11.240 --> 01:41:18.520] I don't know why he said the whole time. He said that she was ready to write his name [01:41:18.520 --> 01:41:26.080] down and get which officers took the gun, the date and everything. I'm like, what? You're [01:41:26.080 --> 01:41:30.720] like, yeah, man, I don't know what you did or what you're doing, but man, as soon as [01:41:30.720 --> 01:41:35.360] I say your name, it was a whole other story. She was ready to write down stuff and telling [01:41:35.360 --> 01:41:42.320] me that they're going to contact me immediately. I'm like, okay, well, we'll see what they [01:41:42.320 --> 01:41:49.360] say when they contact you and then we'll move from there. In my head, in my head, it's impossible. [01:41:49.360 --> 01:41:53.440] I know you take guns. When you take guns, this is a serious thing. It's impossible. [01:41:53.440 --> 01:41:57.280] I'm like, this is impossible, but at least they're talking to you. I'm like, okay. So [01:41:57.280 --> 01:42:03.120] in my head, I'm like, I'm still getting prepared to help teach him, you know, getting stuff [01:42:03.120 --> 01:42:10.400] ready, a method of teaching him because he's so far removed from, you know, the ability [01:42:10.400 --> 01:42:17.520] to obtain all this information at once. So I'm sitting there thinking in my head, now [01:42:17.520 --> 01:42:22.960] he called me back two, two, two and a half weeks later and he's always trying to, he's [01:42:22.960 --> 01:42:26.960] like, yeah, man, we'll call her later. Like, yeah, hey, hey, look, you know, I'm working [01:42:26.960 --> 01:42:31.040] on something. I'm trying to get some work done. So I don't want to pick up the phone, [01:42:31.040 --> 01:42:36.000] but I knew that, you know, I gotta, I gotta help people help me. So I gotta help other [01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:41.200] people. I picked up the phone. He's all hyped up. I'm like, hey, what's going on? He's like, [01:42:41.200 --> 01:42:47.040] man, from Grand Fair just went over the recording on the phone and the city attorney called [01:42:47.040 --> 01:42:52.400] me and they told me that my guns in the office and they will want me to come pick them up. [01:42:52.400 --> 01:42:57.440] I'm like, what did you just say? He's like, yeah, they say that they got the guns in the [01:42:57.440 --> 01:43:04.560] office. They found they got all the guns and some of these are some big guns, 50 caliber [01:43:04.560 --> 01:43:10.560] guns. These are some of these, these are some big guns. I'm like, what? He's like, yeah, [01:43:10.560 --> 01:43:15.120] man, they got them out of the office right here waiting for me. They said, just for me [01:43:15.120 --> 01:43:20.800] to come, for me to come get them. I said, in the city attorney's office? He's like, [01:43:20.800 --> 01:43:25.040] yeah. You know what I'm saying? And I'm just sitting there like in my head, just trying [01:43:25.040 --> 01:43:29.200] to calculate this. Everything is wrong, right? And he's like, what's wrong, man? How come [01:43:29.200 --> 01:43:35.680] you're not celebrating, man? I'll be talking about how bad I am. And I said, don't worry [01:43:35.680 --> 01:43:40.080] about it. As soon as we get off the phone, me and my partner, we're going to celebrate. [01:43:40.080 --> 01:43:45.360] But right now, I just need to make sure I help you follow through with these procedures. [01:43:45.360 --> 01:43:51.920] Okay, hang on. We're about to go to our sponsors. When we come back, I heard the whole story. Now, [01:43:51.920 --> 01:43:56.400] I know exactly where those guns were. And I think you do too, Marty Shag. Randy Kelton, [01:43:56.400 --> 01:44:01.840] Brett Fountain, we'll be right back. Are you being harassed by debt collectors [01:44:01.840 --> 01:44:07.120] with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael [01:44:07.120 --> 01:44:12.400] Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, [01:44:12.400 --> 01:44:17.760] and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in [01:44:17.760 --> 01:44:24.000] court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, [01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:28.640] how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, [01:44:28.640 --> 01:44:34.560] how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mears proven [01:44:34.560 --> 01:44:40.000] method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available [01:44:40.000 --> 01:44:45.280] as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael [01:44:45.280 --> 01:44:55.680] Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s [01:44:55.680 --> 01:45:02.720] at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a [01:45:02.720 --> 01:45:09.360] lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand [01:45:09.360 --> 01:45:16.640] four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, [01:45:16.640 --> 01:45:21.520] know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for [01:45:21.520 --> 01:45:28.800] yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too. Juris Dictionary was [01:45:28.800 --> 01:45:35.280] created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a [01:45:35.280 --> 01:45:40.720] lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices [01:45:40.720 --> 01:45:47.040] that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, [01:45:47.600 --> 01:45:54.800] forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com [01:45:54.800 --> 01:46:06.240] and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:24.800 --> 01:46:43.040] Okay, we are back. Randy Felton, Brett Felton, Rule of Law Radio. And Ken, [01:46:44.480 --> 01:46:52.320] we are not likely to get to you. Marjah has another story to tell, so we probably won't get [01:46:52.320 --> 01:46:57.360] to you tonight. If you'll call back tomorrow, I'll bump you to the top. You there, Ken? [01:46:58.720 --> 01:47:05.040] Yeah. Okay, call back tomorrow and I'll bump you to the top. Marjah's got another good story that's [01:47:05.040 --> 01:47:09.360] somewhat complex, but don't hang up. I think you'll like hearing it. [01:47:10.480 --> 01:47:19.360] Okay. Okay, now we're going to back to Marjah. Okay, where were you? You're just getting the [01:47:19.360 --> 01:47:26.080] guns back and I, when you told me earlier, there was a part that was left out, that they never [01:47:26.080 --> 01:47:32.640] filed any complaints against him. And when I heard it this time, it was clear to me where those guns [01:47:32.640 --> 01:47:42.000] were. You know where they were, don't you, Artichet? No, they were in these cops' houses. [01:47:42.640 --> 01:47:47.680] They stopped this guy. They didn't file any complaint against him, so there's no record. [01:47:47.680 --> 01:47:53.280] They just stole his guns from him. That's felony theft. [01:47:55.760 --> 01:48:01.600] And because the city attorney had them and not the DA, so they weren't in property [01:48:03.600 --> 01:48:08.560] because property's not going to release them without the proper paperwork. There was no [01:48:08.560 --> 01:48:15.040] paperwork. These cops stole these guns and that lawyer told him, you better get those back in here [01:48:15.040 --> 01:48:22.960] right now. You do not want this guy after you. You should have this guy sue you. Charge the [01:48:22.960 --> 01:48:29.600] officers criminally with felony theft. We can't have police officers stealing guns from the public. [01:48:30.160 --> 01:48:36.560] We just can't have that. Right, so some of them make sense. How did they get into the city [01:48:36.560 --> 01:48:41.600] attorney's office without no documents, without no procedure? Just come get your guns. [01:48:41.600 --> 01:48:46.080] Yeah, they've probably got lots of guns they've stolen this way. [01:48:46.080 --> 01:48:51.040] That's real suspicious. We cannot have thieves with guns. [01:48:54.400 --> 01:48:59.920] If they're thieves, they need to get that gun off their hip and go sit in prison for a while [01:48:59.920 --> 01:49:06.960] and get introduced to Jerome, who'll want to be their buddy. [01:49:06.960 --> 01:49:22.800] Right. I guess he was supposed to leave the attorneys out of it. I told him to request [01:49:22.800 --> 01:49:28.800] the assistant and he would leave their name out of it. He don't want anymore bar agreements. [01:49:28.800 --> 01:49:38.720] You know, and because I warned the attorney last time, the next time that his cops touch me, [01:49:38.720 --> 01:49:44.880] that I'm going to include his name in the suit personally. And he's a little creep. [01:49:45.840 --> 01:49:50.640] You know what I'm saying? You got his attention. [01:49:51.760 --> 01:49:57.120] You help me out, then I won't include you in the suit, but I'm going to have to get Mr. [01:49:57.120 --> 01:50:02.240] Lee Day to help me if I don't get my guns back. His guns came right back home. [01:50:03.760 --> 01:50:09.760] No doubt. He called those policemen, told them, you get home, get those guns and get them back in [01:50:09.760 --> 01:50:18.720] here. And the funny thing about it is the suit that I filed against them failed. It didn't fail. [01:50:18.720 --> 01:50:25.360] I just wasn't able to finish processing it because of the electronic process system that [01:50:25.360 --> 01:50:35.600] they're applying right now. But even though I didn't win the case, I still made an impression. [01:50:36.480 --> 01:50:41.280] Yo, that's the good thing about a lawsuit. You got their attention. [01:50:42.560 --> 01:50:49.120] You know, they hear people say, well, sue you for everything you got. They hear that over and over [01:50:49.120 --> 01:50:56.720] and over. I do not threaten to sue. I don't threaten to file criminal complaints. I don't [01:50:56.720 --> 01:51:03.120] give fair warning. I just do it. And that's what you did. So you don't have to tell him [01:51:03.120 --> 01:51:08.480] you'll sue him. He already knows you will. Okay. You have another issue. [01:51:09.200 --> 01:51:16.240] Right. Right. The license issue, right? But now I'm figuring, how do I attack it? [01:51:16.240 --> 01:51:23.040] Because I thought my case that I filed before on the city would address everything, right? [01:51:23.040 --> 01:51:30.560] But like I said, the electronic filing made it not go through. So now I'm thinking to myself, [01:51:30.560 --> 01:51:37.520] well, I have to address this. I have to find a way to address this. I went and re-read the case [01:51:37.520 --> 01:51:44.000] with Tennessee. And I figured out that, because in my head, I was going to use their case to go [01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:51.760] ahead and defeat my case. But when I re-read all the cases from case one, all the way up and down, [01:51:52.720 --> 01:52:00.320] these guys are snakes. They represented the defendants, right? They challenged the statute. [01:52:00.320 --> 01:52:08.080] They won the challenge. The court said that this is unconstitutional. The state appealed it. [01:52:08.080 --> 01:52:15.600] While the state appealed it, the state went back and changed the statute. The state went back and [01:52:15.600 --> 01:52:24.240] changed the statute. But now they're going back and forth in court. Now the district, the appeal [01:52:24.240 --> 01:52:31.440] court states, tells them that, well, since the statute has changed, we have to reconsider the [01:52:31.440 --> 01:52:38.720] argument. And so they went back and redid the argument, right? And then in the argument, now [01:52:38.720 --> 01:52:47.840] they said that, oh, well, because they changed the statute, our grievance is no longer there. [01:52:47.840 --> 01:52:51.120] So they were like, well, since the grievance is no longer there- [01:52:51.120 --> 01:52:53.760] No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. That don't work that way. [01:52:53.760 --> 01:53:01.840] Well, the day you sue, you sue based on the state of the law, the day you sue. [01:53:02.880 --> 01:53:09.120] Yeah. They change it the next day. That's different. You gotta stick with what you got. [01:53:09.920 --> 01:53:16.240] And sometimes that's difficult if you're suing and from something that's old, like you've [01:53:16.240 --> 01:53:23.600] got them in court and had them in court for five or seven years. And finally, they dismiss [01:53:25.200 --> 01:53:34.880] and you file an amended pleading. Everything is adjudicated based on the state of the law [01:53:34.880 --> 01:53:46.320] when the suit was filed or when the incidents occurred. Otherwise, it would be expo facto. [01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:56.320] It makes sense to me, but through reasoning, they ended up deciding that it makes sense, [01:53:56.320 --> 01:54:04.800] it makes sense, but they didn't file for 1983 or something. What they did was just challenge the [01:54:04.800 --> 01:54:12.640] statute saying that it violated indigent defendants' rights. In that case, they're right. [01:54:13.840 --> 01:54:20.880] Right. So that's where I read the case. I'm like, yo, these are sleazeballs. At the end of the day, [01:54:20.880 --> 01:54:27.760] they called the case mute, but the attorneys who represented the indigent defendant ended up [01:54:27.760 --> 01:54:42.400] gaining $500,000. Indigent defendants got nothing because the case was moot. They got the ability [01:54:42.400 --> 01:54:48.960] to get their license back by some type of verbiage that doesn't even seem. They just added another [01:54:48.960 --> 01:54:58.160] section in there, basically saying that you can go address the court and make them notify them that [01:54:58.160 --> 01:55:06.640] you're indigent to get a process, to get your license back. So when I read the case, I'm like, [01:55:06.640 --> 01:55:14.000] these attorneys wrote it up just so they could make money, not to help the indigent defendants [01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:21.840] at mass. Because in that case, the judge wrote an order that said that the state was supposed to [01:55:21.840 --> 01:55:29.520] stop the suspension licensing scheme, return 200,000, almost 300,000 licenses to reverse [01:55:29.520 --> 01:55:36.560] the suspension and do all these things, right, in the order. But because they, at the end, [01:55:36.560 --> 01:55:46.880] it settles on mute, on moot, now that order is nowhere. It's dead. Yeah, moot. Moot. Think [01:55:46.880 --> 01:55:58.240] of a cow mooing and somebody whacks him in the butt. Moot? So all the verdicts that it got are [01:55:58.240 --> 01:56:02.960] nothing now. So all those 300,000 people that were supposed to get their license turned over, [01:56:02.960 --> 01:56:13.200] nothing is dead now. So I got mad at that. But in turn, the judges dissented, dropped all these [01:56:13.200 --> 01:56:18.880] rules and information from the youth. And I was mad at the fact, like, yo, I thought Tennessee [01:56:18.880 --> 01:56:24.560] was going to take care of this, but they actually buried it. But the judges on their dissenting [01:56:24.560 --> 01:56:29.840] decision, and they pointed out all these constitutional things. And then I figured out [01:56:29.840 --> 01:56:35.440] now, like, okay, now I know how to attack it. Leave this challenge in the statute because [01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:42.480] that is a game that they know, they figured out how to beat. That's just something to, [01:56:42.480 --> 01:56:49.680] you know, antagonize them and maybe make them spend money. But now what do I have to do? I have [01:56:49.680 --> 01:56:58.960] to suspend them on 1983. And then now I track them. That event has already happened. The action has [01:56:58.960 --> 01:57:03.600] already happened. You can't do anything about it. So I was going through the research, trying to [01:57:03.600 --> 01:57:10.480] figure out, you know, all the processes and everything. Notices, how to put them on notice [01:57:10.480 --> 01:57:15.120] and everything. See if there was a requirement to do that because I didn't want to start the [01:57:15.120 --> 01:57:24.400] ball this time. So I went to find out the federal, for 1983, there cannot be no notice requirement [01:57:24.400 --> 01:57:32.160] because 1983 is a federal vehicle and it can be used in the state court. And they have state [01:57:32.160 --> 01:57:43.680] courts try to knock it down because of failure to notice the plane. The United States Supreme [01:57:43.680 --> 01:57:49.920] Court ruled that that cannot happen because it is a federal vehicle. It would be superspeeding that. [01:57:49.920 --> 01:57:57.120] So that could happen. Can you send that to me in writing? I would like to read that [01:57:58.800 --> 01:58:03.600] to better understand it. There's some questions I have, but we're out of time [01:58:03.600 --> 01:58:09.120] for today. I'd like to be able to read that. That is an interesting issue. [01:58:09.120 --> 01:58:18.000] Okay. I got the case and then I'll call you tomorrow to tell you about what the Florida [01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:23.760] finance department told me today. Oh, that was the one we wanted to get to you. That was interesting. [01:58:23.760 --> 01:58:30.960] So good. Call in tomorrow. I want everybody to hear this one. Okay. Thank you all for listening. [01:58:31.840 --> 01:58:38.320] We are about out of time. We will be back tomorrow night on our four hour info marathon [01:58:38.320 --> 01:58:46.320] starting at eight o'clock central on rule of law radio. Thank you all for listening and good night. [01:58:49.920 --> 01:58:56.320] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament [01:58:56.320 --> 01:59:01.840] recovery version. The New Testament recovery version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain [01:59:01.840 --> 01:59:07.920] what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:07.920 --> 01:59:16.240] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 [01:59:16.240 --> 01:59:24.560] or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 [01:59:24.560 --> 01:59:30.320] cross references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is [01:59:30.320 --> 01:59:35.440] truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, [01:59:35.440 --> 01:59:48.720] call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:48.720 --> 02:00:03.120] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.