[00:00.000 --> 00:06.360]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution that guarantee
[00:06.360 --> 00:09.560]  the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.560 --> 00:11.040]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:11.040 --> 00:14.960]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.960 --> 00:17.080]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:17.080 --> 00:18.680]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.680 --> 00:22.280]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.280 --> 00:27.040]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:27.040 --> 00:32.120]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.120 --> 00:34.800]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.800 --> 00:39.100]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[00:39.100 --> 00:42.640]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.640 --> 00:44.840]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:44.840 --> 00:47.920]  Spar, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.920 --> 00:51.400]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.400 --> 00:54.600]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.600 --> 01:01.720]  Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly,
[01:01.720 --> 01:03.080]  and R for religion.
[01:03.080 --> 01:07.120]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:07.120 --> 01:10.640]  assembly, and religion, but petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.640 --> 01:14.720]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.720 --> 01:18.240]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out
[01:18.240 --> 01:20.920]  the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:20.920 --> 01:31.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.200 --> 01:34.840]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.840 --> 01:38.280]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.280 --> 01:39.760]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.760 --> 01:43.680]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:43.680 --> 01:46.800]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.800 --> 01:48.400]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.400 --> 01:52.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:52.000 --> 01:56.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:56.760 --> 02:01.760]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.760 --> 02:04.540]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.540 --> 02:08.840]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:08.840 --> 02:12.360]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.360 --> 02:15.960]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.960 --> 02:20.300]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[02:20.300 --> 02:22.360]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.360 --> 02:26.880]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms
[02:26.880 --> 02:30.720]  that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.720 --> 02:31.720]  Get it?
[02:31.720 --> 02:34.040]  Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:34.040 --> 02:37.640]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.640 --> 02:43.360]  when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary
[02:43.360 --> 02:47.480]  privilege, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America,
[02:47.480 --> 02:50.720]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[02:50.720 --> 02:52.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:52.560 --> 03:14.080]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:14.080 --> 03:25.580]  Thank you.
[03:25.580 --> 03:41.580]  We are originators and the pathway seems to get straighter every day And I can take anything
[03:41.580 --> 03:45.580]  that belongs to me and put it to good use
[03:45.580 --> 03:56.580]  Okay, we are back, Greg DeKelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Our Radio on this, the second day of September, 2022
[03:56.580 --> 04:01.580]  And we're talking to Graceful Wayne
[04:01.580 --> 04:04.580]  Did I get that right?
[04:04.580 --> 04:07.580]  Curt Meir
[04:07.580 --> 04:14.580]  Okay, we spent a lot of time on this but I think it's important that we understand
[04:14.580 --> 04:19.580]  Law is pretty well structured
[04:19.580 --> 04:31.580]  And if we're going to bring a claim, we need to bring the claim in terms of a defined cause of action or tort
[04:31.580 --> 04:42.580]  This one, it potentially goes to a number of causes of action, actions as well as tort
[04:42.580 --> 04:55.580]  The fact that they fail to give full disclosure, we need to look at that
[04:55.580 --> 05:05.580]  Hold on, I didn't do that during the break, let me dig out, Brett, pick up here, I'll go do some research
[05:05.580 --> 05:07.580]  You want me to research something?
[05:07.580 --> 05:13.580]  I was going to pull my causes of action and go down through the list of causes of action
[05:13.580 --> 05:20.580]  I don't think I really have anything to say about this, to speak into the issues of radio issues
[05:20.580 --> 05:24.580]  I was just trying to put you on the dime
[05:24.580 --> 05:27.580]  Why don't you put me on some research then?
[05:27.580 --> 05:30.580]  Okay, here it is, causes of action
[05:30.580 --> 05:35.580]  Front page, let's see, causes of action
[05:35.580 --> 05:41.580]  Neglected handling of animal, that's not it
[05:41.580 --> 05:51.580]  Let's see, assault, contract actions, general concepts, breach of contract, quantum merit
[05:51.580 --> 05:58.580]  Quantum merit, cool name but it goes to some, I've read it two or three times, it goes to something about insurance
[05:58.580 --> 06:03.580]  Boiled shrimp, fried shrimp, delayed shrimp
[06:03.580 --> 06:13.580]  Promissory estoppel, suit on sworn account, money had and received, torturous interference with existing contract, let's see
[06:13.580 --> 06:26.580]  Death, drama shop, false imprisonment, fraud, common law fraud, fraud by non-disclosure, statutory fraud
[06:26.580 --> 06:33.580]  Let's see, insurance will jump over, intentional infliction of emotional distress
[06:33.580 --> 06:42.580]  Invasion of privacy, landlord-tenant, legal malpractice, slander, malicious prosecution, some of these are going to go, I'll get your
[06:42.580 --> 06:46.580]  That's why I wanted to go through these to figure out which ones were best, negligence
[06:46.580 --> 06:57.580]  Negligence, negligence per se, negligence, entrustment of a motor vehicle, negligent hiring, negligent misrepresentation
[06:57.580 --> 07:03.580]  Let's see what negligent misrepresentation says
[07:03.580 --> 07:13.580]  Where'd he go, maybe to 733, if you order one of these, this will tell you exactly how to make your claim
[07:13.580 --> 07:15.580]  And what is this that you're reading right now?
[07:15.580 --> 07:18.580]  I'm looking at negligent misrepresentation
[07:18.580 --> 07:21.580]  Here are the elements
[07:21.580 --> 07:32.580]  The defendant made a representation to the plaintiff in the course of the defendant's business or in a transaction in which the defendant had an interest
[07:32.580 --> 07:34.580]  You meet that one
[07:34.580 --> 07:40.580]  The defendant supplied false information for the guidance of others
[07:40.580 --> 07:51.580]  The defendant did not exercise reasonable care or competence in obtaining or communicating the information
[07:51.580 --> 07:56.580]  The plaintiff justifiably relied on the representation
[07:56.580 --> 08:06.580]  The defendant's negligent misrepresentation proximately caused the plaintiff's injury
[08:06.580 --> 08:14.580]  In order to have a claim, you must plead and prove each one of those
[08:14.580 --> 08:19.580]  If you miss one of those, you have no claim
[08:19.580 --> 08:26.580]  Get a O'Connor's Causes of Action and go through it
[08:26.580 --> 08:33.580]  Just like I was doing here, I'm reading these based on what I've heard from you
[08:33.580 --> 08:39.580]  And which ones would be likely to apply?
[08:39.580 --> 08:41.580]  Suits against government
[08:41.580 --> 08:44.580]  Are you making claims against government?
[08:44.580 --> 08:46.580]  Yes
[08:46.580 --> 08:48.580]  Okay, suits against government
[08:48.580 --> 08:50.580]  Let's see
[08:50.580 --> 09:01.580]  The doctrines of sovereign and governmental immunity, breach of contract, discharge of public employee whistleblower
[09:01.580 --> 09:03.580]  Let's see, negligence
[09:03.580 --> 09:05.580]  Tort claims under negligence
[09:05.580 --> 09:07.580]  General concepts
[09:07.580 --> 09:12.580]  Injury by motor vehicle
[09:12.580 --> 09:14.580]  Injury by inmate
[09:14.580 --> 09:16.580]  Texas tort claims
[09:16.580 --> 09:19.580]  Injury by premises, that's not one
[09:19.580 --> 09:21.580]  Special defect
[09:21.580 --> 09:26.580]  945, special defect
[09:26.580 --> 09:30.580]  What does that mean?
[09:30.580 --> 09:40.580]  Let's go find it
[09:40.580 --> 09:44.580]  Sorry about a little dead air there while I'm digging this out
[09:44.580 --> 09:47.580]  It would have been better if I could have done this before the show
[09:47.580 --> 09:50.580]  I'm trying to make a point here
[09:50.580 --> 09:56.580]  In order to have a claim, you must be able to make a specific claim
[09:56.580 --> 09:59.580]  45, okay
[09:59.580 --> 10:02.580]  Injury by special defect
[10:02.580 --> 10:08.580]  A defect is a governmental unit
[10:08.580 --> 10:11.580]  I'm sorry, the defendant is a governmental unit
[10:11.580 --> 10:15.580]  And possessor of premises
[10:15.580 --> 10:17.580]  The condition on the premises was
[10:17.580 --> 10:22.580]  Well, this is a defective premises
[10:22.580 --> 10:26.580]  The condition of the property posed, yeah, that's not
[10:26.580 --> 10:29.580]  Yeah, that would work
[10:29.580 --> 10:32.580]  Okay, go through this, get one
[10:32.580 --> 10:35.580]  I think I'd give seven bucks for this
[10:35.580 --> 10:39.580]  And it was, shipping was paid
[10:39.580 --> 10:43.580]  If you go on eBay and you buy something, make sure you check the shipping cost
[10:43.580 --> 10:47.580]  It cost them more than seven bucks to ship this thing
[10:47.580 --> 10:50.580]  It's so heavy, big
[10:50.580 --> 10:53.580]  But get that and go through all the causes of action
[10:53.580 --> 11:01.580]  If you want to make a claim, you have to make it in terms of one of these causes of actions or tort freezers
[11:01.580 --> 11:05.580]  They're all defined, you can't make up your own
[11:05.580 --> 11:11.580]  And they will all have the elements that you need to prove up the issue
[11:11.580 --> 11:13.580]  So I have a related question
[11:13.580 --> 11:26.580]  Could I do a petition for the declaratory suit to go after the right to refuse under the EUA
[11:26.580 --> 11:30.580]  And prove that that's a right, prove that up
[11:30.580 --> 11:35.580]  Because I didn't get that right, they took that right away
[11:35.580 --> 11:41.580]  So you're going to fraud by non-disclosure
[11:41.580 --> 11:44.580]  Well, I guess so
[11:44.580 --> 11:48.580]  That's a pretty big one
[11:48.580 --> 11:53.580]  Go back and look up fraud by non-disclosure, I actually know what that one is
[11:53.580 --> 11:59.580]  Under fraud by non-disclosure, they have to give
[11:59.580 --> 12:07.580]  The defendant must have given a voluntary statement
[12:07.580 --> 12:19.580]  And they must have withheld information that the defendant had reason to believe the plaintiff was not aware of
[12:19.580 --> 12:23.580]  And did not have equal access to
[12:23.580 --> 12:28.580]  Here it is, 297
[12:28.580 --> 12:31.580]  Just a second here and I'll pull that up
[12:31.580 --> 12:33.580]  So I do it right
[12:33.580 --> 12:39.580]  So I can go online and find the SDS for this thing, they didn't provide it, I found it
[12:39.580 --> 12:42.580]  After the fact
[12:42.580 --> 12:45.580]  Good, safety data sheets
[12:45.580 --> 12:48.580]  Yes, sorry, safety data sheets
[12:48.580 --> 12:51.580]  Here is fraud by non-disclosure
[12:51.580 --> 12:57.580]  The defendant concealed from or failed to disclose certain facts to the plaintiff
[12:57.580 --> 13:02.580]  The defendant had a duty to disclose the facts to the plaintiff
[13:02.580 --> 13:04.580]  The facts were material
[13:04.580 --> 13:15.580]  The defendant knew the plaintiff was ignorant of the facts and the plaintiff did not have equal opportunity to discover the facts
[13:15.580 --> 13:20.580]  The defendant was deliberately silent when it had a duty to speak
[13:20.580 --> 13:23.580]  Tweetle, tweetle the US
[13:23.580 --> 13:25.580]  That's what that goes to
[13:25.580 --> 13:36.580]  By failing to disclose the facts, the defendant intended to induce the plaintiff to take some action or refrain from acting
[13:36.580 --> 13:40.580]  The plaintiff relied on the defendant's non-disclosure
[13:40.580 --> 13:48.580]  The plaintiff was injured as a result of acting without the knowledge of the undisclosed facts
[13:48.580 --> 13:49.580]  Correct
[13:49.580 --> 13:56.580]  You must allege and provide evidence to establish each one of those
[13:56.580 --> 14:04.580]  When you can do that, you're not going to get this failure to state a claim crapola
[14:04.580 --> 14:14.580]  And if there's any issue in there that you need, that you may think that they will claim is not liable
[14:14.580 --> 14:21.580]  And then you use declaratory judgment to get a judicial ruling on the issue
[14:21.580 --> 14:22.580]  That's right
[14:22.580 --> 14:27.580]  So what I was thinking about doing was just go straight to the declaratory judgment
[14:27.580 --> 14:37.580]  Because if I can establish that I had a right to refuse to begin with, then I could circle back and take them to federal district court
[14:37.580 --> 14:39.580]  Or actually tort
[14:39.580 --> 14:40.580]  So there's two
[14:40.580 --> 14:41.580]  I'm looking at two ways
[14:41.580 --> 14:46.580]  Now I have the right to sue under the EEO
[14:46.580 --> 14:53.580]  And I could ask for declaratory suit under the EEO for that opportunity
[14:53.580 --> 14:56.580]  Okay, hold on, hold on, you can't really do that
[14:56.580 --> 14:58.580]  You're mixing two things together
[14:58.580 --> 14:59.580]  I am
[14:59.580 --> 15:05.580]  Yeah, a declaratory judgment is a petition
[15:05.580 --> 15:10.580]  And it's not a suit because in a suit there are claims
[15:10.580 --> 15:14.580]  And you're not making any claims
[15:14.580 --> 15:19.580]  You're just asking the courts to rule on a point of law
[15:19.580 --> 15:28.580]  If you ask for any, if you make any kind of claim, if you ask for any kind of harm or damages, they'll throw it out immediately
[15:28.580 --> 15:32.580]  That is, you can't get attorney fees, you can't get anything
[15:32.580 --> 15:39.580]  And if they want to screw you, the court in their ruling will try to assess attorney fees or assess some kind of fee
[15:39.580 --> 15:42.580]  If they attempt to do that, you object to it
[15:42.580 --> 15:48.580]  There cannot be any harm involved in the declaratory judgment suit
[15:48.580 --> 15:53.580]  You're merely requesting a ruling on point of law
[15:53.580 --> 15:58.580]  Yeah, you're trying to get clarification on your rights or your status
[15:58.580 --> 16:04.580]  Okay, so right or status, and that would definitely do that for
[16:04.580 --> 16:10.580]  You had a right to full disclosure of this information
[16:10.580 --> 16:15.580]  They failed to give you full disclosure of this information
[16:15.580 --> 16:28.580]  Does that, is the defendant, the respondent, in a declaratory judgment suit you got relator and respondent
[16:28.580 --> 16:37.580]  Did respondent have a statutory duty to disclose this information?
[16:37.580 --> 16:42.580]  That you can ask the court
[16:42.580 --> 16:49.580]  Okay, hang on, we're about to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio
[16:49.580 --> 16:54.580]  Let's see, we don't have any room on the board so I won't give out the call and number
[16:54.580 --> 16:59.580]  We'll be right back
[17:24.580 --> 17:26.580]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[17:26.580 --> 17:28.580]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[17:28.580 --> 17:33.580]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[17:33.580 --> 17:38.580]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[17:38.580 --> 17:40.580]  Personal consultation is available as well
[17:40.580 --> 17:46.580]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[17:46.580 --> 17:49.580]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[17:49.580 --> 17:57.580]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[17:57.580 --> 18:01.580]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[18:01.580 --> 18:04.580]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar
[18:04.580 --> 18:07.580]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society
[18:07.580 --> 18:09.580]  And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society
[18:09.580 --> 18:12.580]  Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[18:12.580 --> 18:15.580]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[18:15.580 --> 18:17.580]  The right to act in our own private capacity
[18:17.580 --> 18:19.580]  The right to due process of law
[18:19.580 --> 18:21.580]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[18:21.580 --> 18:24.580]  To learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[18:24.580 --> 18:27.580]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[18:27.580 --> 18:30.580]  Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[18:30.580 --> 18:32.580]  That will help you understand what due process is
[18:32.580 --> 18:34.580]  And how to hold courts to the Rule of Law
[18:34.580 --> 18:36.580]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[18:36.580 --> 18:39.580]  By going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today
[18:39.580 --> 18:41.580]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book
[18:41.580 --> 18:44.580]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie
[18:44.580 --> 18:46.580]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[18:46.580 --> 18:49.580]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[18:49.580 --> 18:53.580]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com
[18:53.580 --> 18:58.580]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve
[19:01.580 --> 19:04.580]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[19:04.580 --> 19:08.580]  Logosradionetwork.com
[19:12.580 --> 19:14.580]  Well, don't let nothing get to you
[19:14.580 --> 19:17.580]  Only the father can deliver you
[19:17.580 --> 19:20.580]  You don't let bad mind people hurt you
[19:20.580 --> 19:23.580]  And test it and get behind you
[19:23.580 --> 19:25.580]  Know what I mean?
[19:25.580 --> 19:28.580]  My friend, and all of your children
[19:28.580 --> 19:29.580]  Come on
[19:29.580 --> 19:31.580]  Trust in God, be free
[19:31.580 --> 19:34.580]  Tell Him you're proud of Him every day
[19:34.580 --> 19:37.580]  Calling His name once a day
[19:37.580 --> 19:40.580]  Every time you know He will say it
[19:40.580 --> 19:43.580]  Trust in God, be free
[19:43.580 --> 19:46.580]  Tell Him you're proud of Him every day
[19:46.580 --> 19:47.580]  Come on
[19:47.580 --> 19:49.580]  Trust in God, be free
[19:49.580 --> 19:52.580]  Tell Him you're proud of Him every day
[19:52.580 --> 19:55.580]  He is the King, He is everything
[19:55.580 --> 19:58.580]  He is everything to me, that's why I call Him
[20:00.580 --> 20:02.580]  Okay, we are back
[20:02.580 --> 20:04.580]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio
[20:04.580 --> 20:07.580]  And we're talking to Graceful Wayne
[20:07.580 --> 20:10.580]  You're never going to lose that tag, you know
[20:10.580 --> 20:14.580]  Look, man, Grace is the smiling assassin
[20:14.580 --> 20:16.580]  That's what I call her
[20:16.580 --> 20:19.580]  Okay
[20:19.580 --> 20:21.580]  Anyhow
[20:21.580 --> 20:23.580]  Okay, I hope we've got our point down
[20:23.580 --> 20:25.580]  This was, when you were talking
[20:25.580 --> 20:27.580]  That was my concern early on
[20:27.580 --> 20:30.580]  You were talking about issues
[20:30.580 --> 20:33.580]  And you were talking about suing
[20:33.580 --> 20:35.580]  But you weren't talking about claims
[20:35.580 --> 20:37.580]  And causes of action
[20:37.580 --> 20:40.580]  I hope that's clear
[20:40.580 --> 20:43.580]  That is clear
[20:43.580 --> 20:45.580]  Good, did my job
[20:45.580 --> 20:48.580]  Okay, do we have anything else for you?
[20:48.580 --> 20:49.580]  I kind of took over
[20:49.580 --> 20:53.580]  Sometimes when someone brings up an issue that
[20:53.580 --> 20:57.580]  I used you, frankly, to talk to everybody else
[20:57.580 --> 21:01.580]  I needed to do a kind of a presentation on how to make claims
[21:01.580 --> 21:03.580]  And I kind of used you to do it
[21:03.580 --> 21:07.580]  So do we have anything that we didn't get to?
[21:07.580 --> 21:09.580]  Very, very quick
[21:09.580 --> 21:12.580]  So the whole idea of a declaratory suit
[21:12.580 --> 21:15.580]  I like the idea of using the
[21:15.580 --> 21:19.580]  Getting the whole idea of petitioning
[21:19.580 --> 21:23.580]  To see if we could define
[21:23.580 --> 21:26.580]  Do I have a right for an EUA to refuse?
[21:26.580 --> 21:27.580]  Yes or no?
[21:27.580 --> 21:28.580]  What does that look like?
[21:28.580 --> 21:33.580]  Also, one of the things that the
[21:33.580 --> 21:36.580]  The government's been playing with
[21:36.580 --> 21:38.580]  Is undo hardship
[21:38.580 --> 21:39.580]  The definition
[21:39.580 --> 21:42.580]  They keep it vague and ambiguous
[21:42.580 --> 21:45.580]  And they use the whole word risk
[21:45.580 --> 21:48.580]  Risk and undo hardship
[21:48.580 --> 21:51.580]  And I'm wondering if I could throw that in and ask them
[21:51.580 --> 21:54.580]  Is that void for vagueness?
[21:54.580 --> 21:56.580]  I mean, how do you define that?
[21:56.580 --> 21:59.580]  It's negative because you look up undo hardship
[21:59.580 --> 22:01.580]  And it should be excessive
[22:01.580 --> 22:06.580]  But the definition that is being used is de minimis
[22:06.580 --> 22:14.580]  Do you have any case law definitions of undo hardness?
[22:14.580 --> 22:15.580]  Okay, I got it
[22:15.580 --> 22:18.580]  Hardship
[22:18.580 --> 22:24.580]  What has the court said about undo hardship?
[22:24.580 --> 22:26.580]  Yeah, I don't have that
[22:26.580 --> 22:28.580]  Do a search for
[22:28.580 --> 22:29.580]  You know, I do
[22:29.580 --> 22:32.580]  Exclusively I search on Google
[22:32.580 --> 22:34.580]  I don't use Google Scholar
[22:34.580 --> 22:37.580]  And I don't use Lexis and Westlaw
[22:37.580 --> 22:39.580]  They're absolutely a waste of time
[22:39.580 --> 22:41.580]  I use Google
[22:41.580 --> 22:43.580]  What you find on Google
[22:43.580 --> 22:49.580]  Are lawyers addressing particular issues
[22:49.580 --> 22:55.580]  Put in how to litigate undo hardship
[22:55.580 --> 23:01.580]  And you'll get lawyers who are trying to get other lawyers
[23:01.580 --> 23:04.580]  To refer them to their cases
[23:04.580 --> 23:07.580]  Lawyers don't like arguing stuff they're not familiar with
[23:07.580 --> 23:12.580]  So if they can find someone who's familiar with, say, undo hardship
[23:12.580 --> 23:15.580]  Then they will bring him into the case
[23:15.580 --> 23:19.580]  And generally 50% of a lawyer's business is by referral
[23:19.580 --> 23:23.580]  So they put out these lawyer websites
[23:23.580 --> 23:27.580]  And they're kind of for the general public
[23:27.580 --> 23:32.580]  But mostly they're for other lawyers who will do just what I do
[23:32.580 --> 23:36.580]  I have an issue I want to plead undo hardship
[23:36.580 --> 23:43.580]  So I'll go on Google and I'll put in how do I plead undo hardship
[23:43.580 --> 23:46.580]  And you'll get hits on lawyer's websites
[23:46.580 --> 23:49.580]  And it won't just be some case
[23:49.580 --> 23:56.580]  But it'll be a treatise, a treatment of how to address this particular issue
[23:56.580 --> 23:59.580]  They'll have all your case law, everything you need
[23:59.580 --> 24:00.580]  They will teach you
[24:00.580 --> 24:02.580]  Does that make sense?
[24:02.580 --> 24:04.580]  Thanks, Randy
[24:04.580 --> 24:06.580]  You are welcome
[24:06.580 --> 24:09.580]  Okay, we're going to go on
[24:09.580 --> 24:11.580]  Thank you, Wayne
[24:11.580 --> 24:15.580]  Now we're going to go to Jane in Texas
[24:15.580 --> 24:16.580]  Hello, Jane
[24:16.580 --> 24:19.580]  What do you have for us today?
[24:19.580 --> 24:20.580]  Hi, Randy
[24:20.580 --> 24:21.580]  How are y'all doing?
[24:21.580 --> 24:23.580]  I'm not getting bread
[24:23.580 --> 24:26.580]  I'm doing good for an old fat guy
[24:26.580 --> 24:30.580]  I can't speak for bread
[24:30.580 --> 24:32.580]  I'm doing well, too
[24:32.580 --> 24:34.580]  Good, good
[24:34.580 --> 24:37.580]  Okay, after we talked last week
[24:37.580 --> 24:43.580]  I have been researching and trying to find case law for the res judicata
[24:43.580 --> 24:47.580]  And it sounds like a dessert or an Italian dish or something
[24:47.580 --> 24:51.580]  But I can't find any case law
[24:51.580 --> 24:56.580]  Okay, that sounds to me more like something my dog left on the porch
[24:56.580 --> 25:01.580]  What? The res judicata?
[25:01.580 --> 25:03.580]  Yeah, and I think res judicata
[25:03.580 --> 25:09.580]  One thing in your case is inability to pay
[25:09.580 --> 25:11.580]  That's res judicata
[25:11.580 --> 25:12.580]  Yes
[25:12.580 --> 25:13.580]  So you've been determined
[25:13.580 --> 25:18.580]  Are you the one that had a court deny you?
[25:18.580 --> 25:20.580]  No, I don't think you are
[25:20.580 --> 25:26.580]  Someone who I was talking to filed for inability to pay in a federal court
[25:26.580 --> 25:33.580]  when they already had a determination of inability to pay
[25:33.580 --> 25:41.580]  And they filed in another federal suit and claimed inability to pay
[25:41.580 --> 25:45.580]  and asked the court to rule that they were indigent
[25:45.580 --> 25:49.580]  Oh, this was Jerry in Pennsylvania
[25:49.580 --> 25:53.580]  And he had already been determined indigent
[25:53.580 --> 25:57.580]  The judge denied him that claim
[25:57.580 --> 26:00.580]  And so he was kind of confused about that
[26:00.580 --> 26:04.580]  And I asked him to file a non fortanque
[26:04.580 --> 26:12.580]  that the request for determination of inability to pay was filed in error
[26:12.580 --> 26:15.580]  that inability to pay was res judicata
[26:15.580 --> 26:17.580]  It had already been determined by another court
[26:17.580 --> 26:23.580]  And this court didn't have power to revisit that ruling
[26:23.580 --> 26:25.580]  All right
[26:25.580 --> 26:29.580]  That's what res judicata generally goes to
[26:29.580 --> 26:32.580]  Res judicata means it's already been adjudicated
[26:32.580 --> 26:37.580]  but it goes to the fact that this court cannot second guess the previous court
[26:37.580 --> 26:41.580]  That becomes essentially collateral estoppel
[26:41.580 --> 26:43.580]  Yeah, I agree with that
[26:43.580 --> 26:47.580]  But the doctrine of res judicata has three different factors though
[26:47.580 --> 26:49.580]  that I've seen are more
[26:49.580 --> 26:53.580]  And one of them is that a prior or final judgment on the merits
[26:53.580 --> 26:56.580]  by a court of competent jurisdiction
[26:56.580 --> 26:58.580]  Yes, that's true
[26:58.580 --> 27:03.580]  Number two is the same parties or those in privity with them
[27:03.580 --> 27:10.580]  And number three is a second action based on the same claim
[27:10.580 --> 27:14.580]  as were raised or could have been raised in the first action
[27:14.580 --> 27:18.580]  So those two statements right there are kind of messing me up
[27:18.580 --> 27:20.580]  Okay, well that just means
[27:20.580 --> 27:23.580]  Okay, read them again
[27:23.580 --> 27:26.580]  I sorted them when you were talking but I lost it
[27:26.580 --> 27:29.580]  Read the second one again
[27:29.580 --> 27:35.580]  The second one says the same parties or those in privity with them
[27:35.580 --> 27:37.580]  Okay, go to the next one
[27:37.580 --> 27:42.580]  A second action based on the same claims as were raised
[27:42.580 --> 27:46.580]  or could have been raised in the first action
[27:46.580 --> 27:49.580]  So what they're saying here is
[27:49.580 --> 27:54.580]  whatever was ruled in the first action is res judicata
[27:54.580 --> 27:56.580]  Another court can't revisit those
[27:56.580 --> 27:58.580]  Read the next one
[27:58.580 --> 28:01.580]  Okay, well the second one again because there's only three
[28:01.580 --> 28:04.580]  I think there might be four but I'm looking at three right now
[28:04.580 --> 28:08.580]  The same parties or those in privity with them
[28:08.580 --> 28:14.580]  Well, that doesn't make sense
[28:14.580 --> 28:16.580]  I know
[28:16.580 --> 28:23.580]  Res judicata goes to a final determination
[28:23.580 --> 28:29.580]  Right, it says a prior final judgment on the merit by a court of competent jurisdiction
[28:29.580 --> 28:31.580]  Yeah, that's the first one
[28:31.580 --> 28:39.580]  And then the second one says the same parties or those in privity with them
[28:39.580 --> 28:43.580]  Okay, they're bound by the prior judgment
[28:43.580 --> 28:45.580]  Okay, so then that's all that means
[28:45.580 --> 28:47.580]  I'm not reading something into that
[28:47.580 --> 28:51.580]  Like it has to be the same people like the
[28:51.580 --> 28:52.580]  No
[28:52.580 --> 28:53.580]  Offensive defense
[28:53.580 --> 28:55.580]  No, it doesn't have to be
[28:55.580 --> 29:03.580]  You went into court and got a determination of inability to pay
[29:03.580 --> 29:07.580]  There are no parties in that
[29:07.580 --> 29:10.580]  You are the only party, you and the state
[29:10.580 --> 29:12.580]  That's the judge, you know
[29:12.580 --> 29:17.580]  Yeah, the judge is the state
[29:17.580 --> 29:25.580]  If this is in a case, the other party in the case doesn't have anything to do with this
[29:25.580 --> 29:31.580]  But here's the thing, they objected to my
[29:31.580 --> 29:35.580]  The other party was in the civil case and they
[29:35.580 --> 29:38.580]  What is it called when you challenge?
[29:38.580 --> 29:42.580]  They challenged my inability to pay
[29:42.580 --> 29:48.580]  And then you file a motion claiming that inability to pay is res judicata
[29:48.580 --> 29:54.580]  And even if it wasn't res judicata, this party has no dog in this hunt
[29:54.580 --> 29:56.580]  Yeah, you're right, you're right
[29:56.580 --> 29:58.580]  They have no standing to it
[29:58.580 --> 30:00.580]  The only one who has standing
[30:00.580 --> 30:03.580]  Everyone knows that walking is a great exercise
[30:03.580 --> 30:08.580]  But you might not know that the way you walk could predict how long you're going to live
[30:08.580 --> 30:14.580]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back to tell you more about walking prognostication in just a moment
[30:14.580 --> 30:16.580]  Privacy is under attack
[30:16.580 --> 30:19.580]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again
[30:19.580 --> 30:24.580]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too
[30:24.580 --> 30:29.580]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself
[30:29.580 --> 30:32.580]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to
[30:32.580 --> 30:35.580]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com
[30:35.580 --> 30:39.580]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing
[30:39.580 --> 30:42.580]  Start over with Startpage
[30:42.580 --> 30:47.580]  New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live
[30:47.580 --> 30:53.580]  The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter per second or faster
[30:53.580 --> 30:55.580]  Live longer than expected
[30:55.580 --> 30:59.580]  In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour
[30:59.580 --> 31:06.580]  A senior's age, gender and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures
[31:06.580 --> 31:09.580]  Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer
[31:09.580 --> 31:12.580]  Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive
[31:12.580 --> 31:15.580]  It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk and a few minutes
[31:15.580 --> 31:20.580]  Researchers say it could help doctors identify older patients who need special care
[31:20.580 --> 31:29.580]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[31:29.580 --> 31:34.580]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001
[31:34.580 --> 31:38.580]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11
[31:38.580 --> 31:42.580]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper was not hit by a plane
[31:42.580 --> 31:46.580]  Although the official exclamation is that fire brought down Building 7
[31:46.580 --> 31:52.580]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story
[31:52.580 --> 31:55.580]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son
[31:55.580 --> 31:57.580]  Go to buildingwatch.org
[31:57.580 --> 32:00.580]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do
[32:00.580 --> 32:06.580]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word?
[32:06.580 --> 32:12.580]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk
[32:12.580 --> 32:17.580]  Where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15
[32:17.580 --> 32:24.580]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth
[32:24.580 --> 32:28.580]  Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark
[32:28.580 --> 32:32.580]  Where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message
[32:32.580 --> 32:39.580]  Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development
[32:39.580 --> 32:43.580]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear
[32:43.580 --> 32:50.580]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus
[32:50.580 --> 32:56.580]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[32:56.580 --> 33:10.580]  To inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures
[33:26.580 --> 33:48.580]  I won't let you pull the wool over my eyes
[33:48.580 --> 33:56.580]  I certainly won't refuse your notes, also nothing lies
[33:56.580 --> 34:04.580]  It seems you like the spare, but please take some words to the wise
[34:04.580 --> 34:17.580]  Please stop trying to pull the wool over my eyes
[34:17.580 --> 34:22.580]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton from Fountain Rouge Law Radio
[34:22.580 --> 34:28.580]  And we're talking to Jane in Texas. When it comes to inability to pay
[34:28.580 --> 34:36.580]  The only ones that this affects is the court clerk because she doesn't get filing fees and stuff
[34:36.580 --> 34:41.580]  And the court reporter because she doesn't get paid for her transcripts
[34:41.580 --> 34:46.580]  Nobody else has standing. They don't have a dog in this hunt
[34:46.580 --> 34:52.580]  So you should file a motion for sanctions
[34:52.580 --> 34:56.580]  Definitely bar grievance for it
[34:56.580 --> 35:01.580]  Well, a motion for sanctions, that would have to go to the appeals court, right?
[35:01.580 --> 35:05.580]  No, it goes to the trial court
[35:05.580 --> 35:13.580]  These guys are wasting my time and they're wasting your time, Judge, with a frivolous pleading
[35:13.580 --> 35:18.580]  They have objected to your informal paupress and they have no standing
[35:18.580 --> 35:21.580]  They don't have a dog in this hunt
[35:21.580 --> 35:26.580]  They're just trying to get me to tower down and not even try to appeal
[35:26.580 --> 35:31.580]  Because I think that they, I don't know if they know the law and I don't know all the law
[35:31.580 --> 35:36.580]  But they're acting like this won't be affecting my appeal
[35:36.580 --> 35:44.580]  But if I read the rules, right, you know, except for them messing with my appeal, that I'm already too late
[35:44.580 --> 35:49.580]  Because I should have filed a brief within like 10 days of the appeal
[35:49.580 --> 35:56.580]  Well, you can file a motion for extension of time
[35:56.580 --> 36:00.580]  When did you become too late?
[36:00.580 --> 36:07.580]  Well, if I, when I filed my notice of appeal on the 29th of July
[36:07.580 --> 36:11.580]  Whenever I also did the motion for a new file
[36:11.580 --> 36:17.580]  That notice of appeal should have actually, 10 days later, should have come with a brief
[36:17.580 --> 36:20.580]  Okay, hold on, hold on
[36:20.580 --> 36:27.580]  When you filed your motion for appeal, was there anything else going on in the trial court?
[36:27.580 --> 36:32.580]  Did you file a request for findings of fact?
[36:32.580 --> 36:34.580]  Yeah, I did that and
[36:34.580 --> 36:36.580]  Okay, that stops the clock
[36:36.580 --> 36:38.580]  Okay, okay
[36:38.580 --> 36:41.580]  Your, your notice of appeal is in the record
[36:41.580 --> 36:44.580]  But it just sits there until the clock starts again
[36:44.580 --> 36:51.580]  If you file a request for findings of fact, when did the court deny that request?
[36:51.580 --> 36:56.580]  Well, they didn't deny it, they actually, they attempted to do it, remember I was reading
[36:56.580 --> 36:59.580]  Okay, well how long was it?
[36:59.580 --> 37:08.580]  You don't start counting your appeal date until a final adjudication in the trial court
[37:08.580 --> 37:14.580]  Okay, so that would be what's coming up then, their fake hearing or else, not their fake hearing
[37:14.580 --> 37:23.580]  But my motion to dismiss the hearing that they're having to clarify the findings and also to prove my inagency, you know, so
[37:23.580 --> 37:26.580]  So all of that's still working
[37:26.580 --> 37:28.580]  Yes, okay, good, good, good
[37:28.580 --> 37:35.580]  So your notice of appeal is just sitting in the record, the clock hasn't started on that yet
[37:35.580 --> 37:46.580]  Okay, so whenever I file this motion to dismiss the hearing because of the fact that they have no standing because of my poppers, you know, they don't have any standing in that
[37:46.580 --> 37:49.580]  Then should I also file a brief at that point or just wait?
[37:49.580 --> 37:55.580]  No, that's when the clock starts, that's like you filed a notice of appeal that day
[37:55.580 --> 37:57.580]  Okay
[37:57.580 --> 38:09.580]  If you, you know, what I would suggest that people do is if they have any question about whether or not it's time to file a notice of intent to appeal, file it
[38:09.580 --> 38:10.580]  Okay
[38:10.580 --> 38:18.580]  If you filed it too soon, it simply sits in the record until it becomes timely
[38:18.580 --> 38:21.580]  That won't hurt anything in advance
[38:21.580 --> 38:22.580]  Okay
[38:22.580 --> 38:30.580]  So you filed in advance, there's still stuff going on in the trial court, so your notice of appeal is not timely
[38:30.580 --> 38:31.580]  All right
[38:31.580 --> 38:42.580]  When the clock runs out and when they make their, when the judge makes a final ruling on all the issues in the trial court, then the clock starts
[38:42.580 --> 38:46.580]  And the clock has a longer deadline because you filed that
[38:46.580 --> 38:53.580]  And whatever you do, don't miss that deadline, you can file a piece of crap
[38:53.580 --> 38:54.580]  Okay
[38:54.580 --> 39:00.580]  Just get it in by the deadline and then you can file an amended
[39:00.580 --> 39:01.580]  Oh, you know what
[39:01.580 --> 39:08.580]  Oh, Your Honor, my mistake, I filed a working document, I've done that three or four times
[39:08.580 --> 39:18.580]  I filed a working document, they filed the wrong one, my bad, please accept this as an amended
[39:18.580 --> 39:22.580]  Appeal brief
[39:22.580 --> 39:23.580]  Yeah
[39:23.580 --> 39:25.580]  And they always grant that
[39:25.580 --> 39:39.580]  Well, so then I suspect then, if it's seven days before a hearing in this court, then I suspect I have to better get my motion in to them seven days before the 19th when they're supposed to have this whole
[39:39.580 --> 39:41.580]  What motion are you speaking to?
[39:41.580 --> 39:48.580]  The motion to dismiss the hearing that they're going to be having to clarify the findings
[39:48.580 --> 39:49.580]  Yes
[39:49.580 --> 39:54.580]  You know, and for me to prove any, you know, so I need to
[39:54.580 --> 39:59.580]  You do that to me a lot, you shift gears without telling me
[39:59.580 --> 40:02.580]  I didn't think I was shifting gears
[40:02.580 --> 40:12.580]  You shifted to something else there, we were talking about when you file your notice of intent to appeal and when it becomes effective
[40:12.580 --> 40:13.580]  Right
[40:13.580 --> 40:18.580]  And you shifted to a hearing that's coming up
[40:18.580 --> 40:24.580]  It has to do with the same thing though, it's all in the same court though, you know what I mean
[40:24.580 --> 40:30.580]  Okay, I'm being pedantic here, when you go to court you have to be very clear
[40:30.580 --> 40:31.580]  Okay
[40:31.580 --> 40:40.580]  You can't make these kinds of jumps, always when I'm dealing with legal documents
[40:40.580 --> 40:52.580]  I'm always thinking where is the mind of the judge and how do I take his mind and take it to this point and move his mind from one point to the next
[40:52.580 --> 40:54.580]  That's why I hate acronyms
[40:54.580 --> 40:55.580]  Okay
[40:55.580 --> 41:07.580]  Because when the judge gets to an acronym, he has to stop and compare each letter in the acronym to what he thinks it is in his mind
[41:07.580 --> 41:15.580]  To make sure that there's not a letter in there that he missed, that all the letters are in the right order
[41:15.580 --> 41:21.580]  It always causes the judge to drop out of mental flow
[41:21.580 --> 41:28.580]  Except for the head of Ross Matthews Law Firm
[41:28.580 --> 41:29.580]  Okay
[41:29.580 --> 41:42.580]  I was in a meeting with Lynn Ross, the founder of Ross Matthews Law Firm and he's writing me out a business structure for his business
[41:42.580 --> 41:44.580]  And he got a phone call
[41:44.580 --> 41:53.580]  He picked up the phone and stuck it in his ear and he's talking to this guy while his hand is writing like crazy
[41:53.580 --> 42:02.580]  I'm looking at this not believing what I'm seeing, human beings simply do not multitask
[42:02.580 --> 42:04.580]  Okay
[42:04.580 --> 42:12.580]  He held a conversation and wrote instructions of something totally different at the same time
[42:12.580 --> 42:13.580]  Wow
[42:13.580 --> 42:22.580]  Never have I seen that before, point is, never ever expect your judge to be able to do that
[42:22.580 --> 42:24.580]  Right, exactly
[42:24.580 --> 42:30.580]  You have to carefully lead his mind from one point to the next
[42:30.580 --> 42:39.580]  Never, you know, the caller earlier, Florence, objected to her using pronouns
[42:39.580 --> 42:46.580]  You use a pronoun and always it will knock them out of flow
[42:46.580 --> 42:55.580]  The reader has to stop and double check the pronoun to make sure who or what the pronoun refers to
[42:55.580 --> 42:57.580]  And that knocks them out of mental flow
[42:57.580 --> 42:58.580]  Okay
[42:58.580 --> 43:05.580]  So when you're out of pleading, and I will object to some things here that you may think I'm being pedantic
[43:05.580 --> 43:11.580]  But it's all about demonstrating how to write something that when somebody reads it
[43:11.580 --> 43:18.580]  They start reading and they get to the end before they realize they get to the end
[43:18.580 --> 43:24.580]  Have you ever tried to set a document to meter?
[43:24.580 --> 43:26.580]  To meter?
[43:26.580 --> 43:33.580]  Meter is so subliminally powerful you won't believe it
[43:33.580 --> 43:43.580]  Iambic pentameter, da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da
[43:43.580 --> 43:45.580]  Well that screwed things up
[43:45.580 --> 43:50.580]  You expected me to land on a beat, that's meter
[43:50.580 --> 43:53.580]  And if you set a document to meter, it's compelling
[43:53.580 --> 43:55.580]  Hang on, we'll be right back
[43:55.580 --> 43:56.580]  Okay
[43:56.580 --> 44:01.580]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved
[44:01.580 --> 44:03.580]  Except in the area of nutrition
[44:03.580 --> 44:06.580]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves
[44:06.580 --> 44:08.580]  And it's time we changed all that
[44:08.580 --> 44:14.580]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition
[44:14.580 --> 44:19.580]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated
[44:19.580 --> 44:22.580]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need
[44:22.580 --> 44:28.580]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject
[44:28.580 --> 44:31.580]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much
[44:31.580 --> 44:36.580]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others
[44:36.580 --> 44:44.580]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio
[44:44.580 --> 44:48.580]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us
[44:48.580 --> 44:55.580]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income
[44:55.580 --> 44:57.580]  Order now
[44:57.580 --> 45:00.580]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:00.580 --> 45:07.580]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[45:07.580 --> 45:11.580]  That will show you how in 24 hours, step by step
[45:11.580 --> 45:15.580]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[45:15.580 --> 45:19.580]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[45:19.580 --> 45:24.580]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too
[45:24.580 --> 45:30.580]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience
[45:30.580 --> 45:35.580]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:35.580 --> 45:39.580]  About the principles and practices that control our American courts
[45:39.580 --> 45:48.580]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more
[45:48.580 --> 46:12.580]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ
[46:18.580 --> 46:41.580]  Music
[46:41.580 --> 46:45.580]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio
[46:45.580 --> 46:57.580]  And we're talking to Jane in Texas, and I was talking about how to always keep your reader or listener following along
[46:57.580 --> 47:03.580]  Jane, you shifted the gear and didn't tell me, and all of a sudden I was lost
[47:03.580 --> 47:11.580]  You're talking, and I'm trying to figure out where in the heck are we here, and you just completely lost me
[47:11.580 --> 47:16.580]  Okay, I understand what you're saying, you're right, I do need more of that, that's for sure
[47:16.580 --> 47:19.580]  Well, and that's why I mentioned meter
[47:19.580 --> 47:25.580]  There's a book I've been working on for about 15 years, and the first page I went over about 100 times
[47:25.580 --> 47:32.580]  I pulled it up a few days ago, and everywhere I had a period I replaced it with a carriage return
[47:32.580 --> 47:39.580]  So I got every sentence on a different line, and then I looked at how big they were
[47:39.580 --> 47:49.580]  And I rewrote the page so that the first sentence had, I think it had 15 syllable sounds
[47:49.580 --> 47:54.580]  Then I set the second sentence to 12 syllable sounds
[47:54.580 --> 48:05.580]  And then the next one was, all of the large sentences I set to 15 syllable sounds, and the one under it, sometimes I could get 12 and sometimes more or less
[48:05.580 --> 48:08.580]  But it revolved around 12
[48:08.580 --> 48:13.580]  You read that and your mind generates a cadence
[48:13.580 --> 48:18.580]  Da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da
[48:18.580 --> 48:22.580]  Da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da
[48:22.580 --> 48:28.580]  That's something that goes on completely outside of conscious awareness
[48:28.580 --> 48:29.580]  Right
[48:29.580 --> 48:35.420]  And if you ever listen to some of the newer country western songs, it's like they got
[48:35.420 --> 48:40.420]  music underneath and these guys are singing a song and the two don't have anything to
[48:40.420 --> 48:44.100]  do with each other.
[48:44.100 --> 48:53.980]  But the older songs, when they sang, each syllable sound landed squarely on a note.
[48:53.980 --> 48:59.860]  And if they miss one note, you'll notice it immediately, you'll trip over it.
[48:59.860 --> 49:02.820]  It'll just jump right out at you.
[49:02.820 --> 49:10.620]  In writing, you always want your reader to have an expectation and you always meet that
[49:10.620 --> 49:12.380]  expectation.
[49:12.380 --> 49:19.100]  If you ever create a question in the mind of your reader, you need to know you did that.
[49:19.100 --> 49:27.940]  You need to have done it on purpose and you need to answer that question immediately.
[49:27.940 --> 49:30.580]  It's not as hard as it sounds.
[49:30.580 --> 49:35.540]  It's just a little bit of a different discipline and I wasn't just talking to you Jane, I'm
[49:35.540 --> 49:41.660]  really talking to everybody else so I'm not really trying to just instruct you and order
[49:41.660 --> 49:42.660]  you around.
[49:42.660 --> 49:45.380]  It doesn't bother me, I need it.
[49:45.380 --> 49:50.620]  Oh well, I could order you around, my wife didn't like that.
[49:50.620 --> 49:56.220]  She got mad at me on our wedding night because I read the Bible to her.
[49:56.220 --> 49:59.620]  Do you believe that?
[49:59.620 --> 50:03.900]  But I did read that part that said a woman's desire shall be unto her husband and he shall
[50:03.900 --> 50:07.620]  have dominion over thee.
[50:07.620 --> 50:10.820]  I wasn't exercising dominion, honest.
[50:10.820 --> 50:13.540]  Okay enough screwing around.
[50:13.540 --> 50:19.380]  Okay where were we, I lost where we were at, I was having too much fun.
[50:19.380 --> 50:26.980]  I think, I agree with you, I need to start looking at the things that I write on a different
[50:26.980 --> 50:27.980]  perspective.
[50:27.980 --> 50:30.820]  As far as somebody else's perspective, it's better my own.
[50:30.820 --> 50:31.820]  Go ahead.
[50:31.820 --> 50:42.580]  I was just going to say always try to think of where your reader is at and what question
[50:42.580 --> 50:44.220]  you're going to create in their mind.
[50:44.220 --> 50:52.780]  That is probably the most powerful thing you can do, the rest of it will fall into place.
[50:52.780 --> 50:57.700]  Like it turns out it's in the rules, I've been talking about this for a long time, put
[50:57.700 --> 51:03.620]  a heading on every paragraph and then keep your paragraph to a single subject matching
[51:03.620 --> 51:04.620]  that heading.
[51:04.620 --> 51:08.060]  It turns out that's in the rules.
[51:08.060 --> 51:13.060]  Enter every paragraph and make every paragraph one subject.
[51:13.060 --> 51:16.300]  It makes sense.
[51:16.300 --> 51:22.740]  I put headings in and I leave them in but you can take them out once you're done.
[51:22.740 --> 51:28.260]  But I leave them in because that's the director, I'm directing the reader.
[51:28.260 --> 51:33.940]  In this paragraph, this is what I'm going to talk about and then I talk about that issue
[51:33.940 --> 51:41.060]  and then when I change issues, I put in another heading.
[51:41.060 --> 51:45.740]  A lot of people we talk to, I got an email from someone the other day that was a full
[51:45.740 --> 51:52.100]  page with three sentences.
[51:52.100 --> 51:53.940]  Nobody can read that thing.
[51:53.940 --> 51:57.780]  No human being can read that and make sense of it.
[51:57.780 --> 52:01.940]  Make your sentences absolutely as short as possible.
[52:01.940 --> 52:11.500]  I sometimes have sentences with three or four words in them and not a problem.
[52:11.500 --> 52:17.300]  Every period gives you a mental break when you're reading a document.
[52:17.300 --> 52:23.800]  A paragraph tells you we're going to shift some gears here.
[52:23.800 --> 52:28.580]  If you shift gears inside a paragraph, you lose your reader every time.
[52:28.580 --> 52:32.860]  Okay, I'm going to stop, that's something we need to do a show on.
[52:32.860 --> 52:36.700]  Okay, let's go back to what you have for us.
[52:36.700 --> 52:39.140]  Okay, a couple of things.
[52:39.140 --> 52:44.900]  I have been learning about my points of error and I'm just going to make this comment and
[52:44.900 --> 52:47.220]  then I'm going to make one more comment.
[52:47.220 --> 52:55.900]  The points of error, I had originally filed the motion for a new trial with most points
[52:55.900 --> 53:02.980]  of error meaning that I withstand stuff like, well, this witness lied on the stand, this
[53:02.980 --> 53:06.620]  witness lied on the stand, but that's not what points of errors are.
[53:06.620 --> 53:11.900]  What they are is like abuse of discretion and stuff like that.
[53:11.900 --> 53:15.660]  Okay, what a point of error is.
[53:15.660 --> 53:23.540]  These are the facts and this is the law the judge should have applied to the facts and
[53:23.540 --> 53:28.740]  this is how the judge should have applied the law to the facts and the judge failed
[53:28.740 --> 53:33.060]  to apply the law to the facts and that's a point of error.
[53:33.060 --> 53:41.060]  Right, but I was thinking it was more like what law it is, the points of error are just
[53:41.060 --> 53:47.020]  points of the law that was broken like abuse of discretion, official oppression or something
[53:47.020 --> 53:48.020]  like that.
[53:48.020 --> 53:53.100]  Are those not like the points of error or do you have to use the law?
[53:53.100 --> 54:00.460]  If the judge fails to properly apply the law to the facts, then that becomes a separate
[54:00.460 --> 54:04.380]  issue and that will become official oppression or official misconduct.
[54:04.380 --> 54:05.380]  Okay.
[54:05.380 --> 54:06.380]  Okay.
[54:06.380 --> 54:14.660]  But read Walker v. Packer, it explains this, that he must properly apply the law to the
[54:14.660 --> 54:15.660]  facts.
[54:15.660 --> 54:22.180]  If he doesn't, that is an abuse of discretion which is an error and it says the only thing
[54:22.180 --> 54:30.100]  you can appeal is an abuse of discretion by the court for failing to properly apply the
[54:30.100 --> 54:31.780]  law to the facts.
[54:31.780 --> 54:33.780]  And that's exactly what happened.
[54:33.780 --> 54:37.580]  Good, so read that.
[54:37.580 --> 54:43.340]  And then I wanted to say a while ago you were giving municipal judges excuses for breaking
[54:43.340 --> 54:47.940]  the law like they've been doing for so long, like maybe that's because they've been taught
[54:47.940 --> 54:51.020]  that way and they don't know any better.
[54:51.020 --> 54:58.020]  But I don't agree with that because I think that they do know better because how can this
[54:58.020 --> 55:05.340]  judge in this court, how can any of these municipal judges sit there and not apply whenever
[55:05.340 --> 55:14.260]  they are tasked with proving a criminal action beyond a reasonable doubt, but then yet they
[55:14.260 --> 55:19.980]  don't apply the element to the, you know, to prove that and they don't...
[55:19.980 --> 55:22.740]  Okay, wait, wait, wait.
[55:22.740 --> 55:25.460]  You misunderstood me.
[55:25.460 --> 55:30.220]  I was trying to get people to understand how this happens.
[55:30.220 --> 55:31.220]  Okay.
[55:31.220 --> 55:35.540]  I'm not giving any excuse.
[55:35.540 --> 55:43.220]  I understand why Judge Whitaker felt like he didn't have to issue warrants on my complaints.
[55:43.220 --> 55:46.420]  He's been in this job a long time and he's done the same things.
[55:46.420 --> 55:49.260]  He's been doing this for a long time and I understood that.
[55:49.260 --> 55:55.380]  And I used that against him because I pretty well knew what he was going to do.
[55:55.380 --> 55:58.500]  And I gave him opportunity to do it.
[55:58.500 --> 56:00.860]  And when he did, I landed on him like a ton of bricks.
[56:00.860 --> 56:03.460]  So I'm not giving them excuses.
[56:03.460 --> 56:10.260]  I'm trying to get it so that you understand where they live so that you can predict their
[56:10.260 --> 56:11.260]  behavior.
[56:11.260 --> 56:17.820]  If you can predict their behavior, you can more effectively manipulate their behavior.
[56:17.820 --> 56:19.700]  Right, through...
[56:19.700 --> 56:20.700]  Well...
[56:20.700 --> 56:26.340]  Now, I know how the judge has been trained so I can address that.
[56:26.340 --> 56:30.940]  I realize that this is a standard way of doing things, but here's the law that applies to
[56:30.940 --> 56:33.940]  these issues in this particular case.
[56:33.940 --> 56:37.780]  So therefore, the standard way of doing things is not appropriate.
[56:37.780 --> 56:38.780]  Right.
[56:38.780 --> 56:40.780]  Lead him to...
[56:40.780 --> 56:41.780]  Manipulate him.
[56:41.780 --> 56:43.780]  Lead him to where you want him to be.
[56:43.780 --> 56:44.780]  Right.
[56:44.780 --> 56:49.220]  But even as you point it out to them and they're aware of it, maybe because they had forgotten
[56:49.220 --> 56:53.380]  or something, and then you point it out to them and then you show them the error of their
[56:53.380 --> 56:56.660]  ways and they still go ahead and pursue you anyway.
[56:56.660 --> 56:57.660]  You know what I'm saying?
[56:57.660 --> 56:58.660]  So that's...
[56:58.660 --> 57:01.180]  Then charge them criminally and file with a grand jury.
[57:01.180 --> 57:02.180]  Yeah.
[57:02.180 --> 57:03.180]  Yeah.
[57:03.180 --> 57:06.180]  Let them explain to a grand jury why they're doing this.
[57:06.180 --> 57:07.180]  Right.
[57:07.180 --> 57:10.980]  Or at least make grand jury noises.
[57:10.980 --> 57:14.660]  Grand jury noises terrifies them.
[57:14.660 --> 57:16.300]  This guy's trying to get me arrested.
[57:16.300 --> 57:22.900]  What if there's somebody on the jury whose son or grandson I ruled against in something
[57:22.900 --> 57:23.900]  similar?
[57:23.900 --> 57:25.900]  They're going to crucify me.
[57:25.900 --> 57:26.900]  Right.
[57:26.900 --> 57:27.900]  Right.
[57:27.900 --> 57:30.700]  Good luck with that, guys.
[57:30.700 --> 57:34.340]  They think she's trying to get to the grand jury, but she won't be able to then prosecute
[57:34.340 --> 57:42.140]  or block her, maybe, but what if she does?
[57:42.140 --> 57:44.940]  Who wants to play Russian roulette?
[57:44.940 --> 57:45.940]  Right.
[57:45.940 --> 57:46.940]  Yeah.
[57:46.940 --> 57:52.300]  Don't be disappointed if you don't get the outcomes you want.
[57:52.300 --> 57:54.620]  We're training these guys.
[57:54.620 --> 58:01.860]  I went after the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 2008, and I did not get them indicted,
[58:01.860 --> 58:07.420]  but what I complained about does not happen anymore in the state of Texas.
[58:07.420 --> 58:12.460]  They cut that garbage out.
[58:12.460 --> 58:13.460]  Oh, wow.
[58:13.460 --> 58:14.460]  Okay.
[58:14.460 --> 58:15.460]  Hang on.
[58:15.460 --> 58:20.700]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio, still got a full board of callers.
[58:20.700 --> 58:22.060]  Jason, you're on.
[58:22.060 --> 58:23.820]  You were on last night.
[58:23.820 --> 58:26.340]  We will take you next.
[58:26.340 --> 58:31.180]  We got John from New York and E.J. from California.
[58:31.180 --> 58:32.180]  We will get to everybody.
[58:32.180 --> 58:37.180]  Brett, I'm running out of words to say, and I've got 15 seconds.
[58:37.180 --> 58:40.140]  Come on, dive in there for me.
[58:40.140 --> 58:47.980]  Well, there is something I would like to explain when we come back on the other side about
[58:47.980 --> 58:50.460]  keeping subjects separate.
[58:50.460 --> 58:54.620]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.620 --> 58:59.780]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[58:59.780 --> 59:01.140]  can really help.
[59:01.140 --> 59:05.580]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.580 --> 59:06.580]  today.
[59:06.580 --> 59:10.500]  It has accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you
[59:10.500 --> 59:13.620]  to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.620 --> 59:18.860]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.860 --> 59:23.140]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan
[59:23.140 --> 59:28.060]  of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church.
[59:28.060 --> 59:33.060]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:33.060 --> 59:45.820]  Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102, that's 888-551-0102, or visit
[59:45.820 --> 59:48.620]  us online at bfa.org.
[59:48.620 --> 01:00:02.460]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:02.460 --> 01:00:27.940]  The
[01:00:27.940 --> 01:00:32.940]  Protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:32.940 --> 01:00:34.940]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:34.940 --> 01:00:38.940]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[01:00:38.940 --> 01:00:42.940]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:42.940 --> 01:00:45.940]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:00:45.940 --> 01:00:48.940]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[01:00:48.940 --> 01:00:51.940]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[01:00:51.940 --> 01:00:54.940]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:54.940 --> 01:00:57.940]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed
[01:00:57.940 --> 01:01:00.940]  reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent.
[01:01:00.940 --> 01:01:03.940]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers,
[01:01:03.940 --> 01:01:06.940]  a common demand in the days of our founding fathers.
[01:01:06.940 --> 01:01:09.940]  Third party? Third Amendment? Get it?
[01:01:09.940 --> 01:01:12.940]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging,
[01:01:12.940 --> 01:01:16.940]  tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and re-read the Third Amendment.
[01:01:16.940 --> 01:01:31.940]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:31.940 --> 01:01:35.940]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:35.940 --> 01:01:38.940]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:38.940 --> 01:01:40.940]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:40.940 --> 01:01:43.940]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:01:43.940 --> 01:01:46.940]  to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:02:14.940 --> 01:02:18.940]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars,
[01:02:18.940 --> 01:02:21.940]  a magnifying glass or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[01:02:21.940 --> 01:02:25.940]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom
[01:02:25.940 --> 01:02:27.940]  from unreasonable search and seizure.
[01:02:27.940 --> 01:02:30.940]  Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it?
[01:02:30.940 --> 01:02:33.940]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights
[01:02:33.940 --> 01:02:35.940]  in the name of security.
[01:02:35.940 --> 01:02:39.940]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[01:02:39.940 --> 01:02:43.940]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause,
[01:02:43.940 --> 01:02:46.940]  I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:02:46.940 --> 01:02:49.940]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[01:02:49.940 --> 01:02:53.940]  and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:53.940 --> 01:03:10.940]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:23.940 --> 01:03:31.940]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:31.940 --> 01:03:34.940]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheelbarrow Radio.
[01:03:34.940 --> 01:03:36.940]  We're talking to Jane in Texas.
[01:03:36.940 --> 01:03:42.940]  Okay, Jane, I'm going to shut up now and let you address what you came here for.
[01:03:42.940 --> 01:03:46.940]  I kind of bushwhacked you earlier.
[01:03:46.940 --> 01:03:48.940]  And when you get done, I have a suggestion.
[01:03:48.940 --> 01:03:49.940]  Yeah.
[01:03:49.940 --> 01:03:50.940]  Oh, that's right.
[01:03:50.940 --> 01:03:53.940]  Go ahead, Brett, because...
[01:03:53.940 --> 01:03:55.940]  Are you going to start there?
[01:03:55.940 --> 01:04:01.940]  Okay, well, it's something I've noticed about myself and about you,
[01:04:01.940 --> 01:04:09.940]  and it's pretty common that when you're looking at a really complex issue,
[01:04:09.940 --> 01:04:11.940]  there's a lot going on in the court.
[01:04:11.940 --> 01:04:16.940]  There's this, about this, and hearing, and then there's that deadline.
[01:04:16.940 --> 01:04:22.940]  And as soon as our minds settle one issue and kind of deal with it
[01:04:22.940 --> 01:04:28.940]  and are, let's say, satisfied with, I think I know how I'm going to handle that,
[01:04:28.940 --> 01:04:32.940]  well, then we already start looking to the next issue and what's coming up,
[01:04:32.940 --> 01:04:35.940]  the next deadline, and, oh, but what if they counter with this?
[01:04:35.940 --> 01:04:38.940]  I've got to have that tied up really well.
[01:04:38.940 --> 01:04:44.940]  And that's, I think, possibly where some of your jumping around,
[01:04:44.940 --> 01:04:48.940]  kind of the sense of you jumping around, that could be where that's connected to.
[01:04:48.940 --> 01:04:52.940]  And it doesn't work in the courtroom.
[01:04:52.940 --> 01:04:59.940]  You can't go to some other issue, even though your mind is already ready to leap to there, you can't.
[01:04:59.940 --> 01:05:06.940]  You have to be disciplined and only deal with what's before the court right then, right there.
[01:05:06.940 --> 01:05:09.940]  That's one thing that I think judges really appreciate,
[01:05:09.940 --> 01:05:15.940]  if you can hone that skill of not talking about something that's not before the court yet,
[01:05:15.940 --> 01:05:19.940]  or it's not timely, or maybe it's going to be next.
[01:05:19.940 --> 01:05:22.940]  Maybe it's five minutes later, that will be the topic.
[01:05:22.940 --> 01:05:28.940]  But if you can really focus your mind, your attention,
[01:05:28.940 --> 01:05:35.940]  and only deal with the issues that go to that one thing that's before the court.
[01:05:35.940 --> 01:05:39.940]  Because sometimes, like, let's say it's a disqualification of a judge.
[01:05:39.940 --> 01:05:42.940]  It doesn't matter anything about the merits of the case.
[01:05:42.940 --> 01:05:48.940]  It doesn't matter at all about what's going on, what's about to happen after the judge,
[01:05:48.940 --> 01:05:50.940]  the disqualification is handled.
[01:05:50.940 --> 01:06:00.940]  All that matters is who's going to be the judge based on is this one getting disqualified or not.
[01:06:00.940 --> 01:06:09.940]  Jane, were you on that last hearing I had in Victoria County?
[01:06:09.940 --> 01:06:12.940]  No, but I watched it. I watched it.
[01:06:12.940 --> 01:06:21.940]  Okay. I was really struggling with exactly what Brett's talking about.
[01:06:21.940 --> 01:06:27.940]  I challenged the authority of the judge to recuse himself.
[01:06:27.940 --> 01:06:31.940]  And I've got an appointed judge here, and the judge asked me,
[01:06:31.940 --> 01:06:38.940]  well, do you object to me sitting as judge?
[01:06:38.940 --> 01:06:46.940]  And I had to catch myself and then say, we're not there yet.
[01:06:46.940 --> 01:06:53.940]  We're talking about whether or not the trial judge properly recused himself.
[01:06:53.940 --> 01:06:58.940]  We're not getting to the point whether or not I agree with the judge
[01:06:58.940 --> 01:07:01.940]  that had been appointed to sit in his place.
[01:07:01.940 --> 01:07:05.940]  He was trying to lead me to the wrong issue.
[01:07:05.940 --> 01:07:08.940]  And it was a struggle for me to stay fixed on point.
[01:07:08.940 --> 01:07:15.940]  I had all kind of stuff I could throw at him, and I wanted to.
[01:07:15.940 --> 01:07:20.940]  But I had to stay on point or I would have lost that point.
[01:07:20.940 --> 01:07:22.940]  Did you notice that?
[01:07:22.940 --> 01:07:25.940]  Yeah. I mean, I didn't notice you struggling.
[01:07:25.940 --> 01:07:36.940]  I just noticed that you rang yourself in and told them that you still wanted to object to him being there.
[01:07:36.940 --> 01:07:39.940]  And so they were going to have to send in another judge.
[01:07:39.940 --> 01:07:41.940]  But I see what you mean.
[01:07:41.940 --> 01:07:46.940]  I mean, he was trying to kind of rope you in there or something like that.
[01:07:46.940 --> 01:07:50.940]  I did see it. So I didn't see you struggling, though.
[01:07:50.940 --> 01:07:54.940]  Well, I've done it enough that I got better at hiding it.
[01:07:54.940 --> 01:08:01.940]  But I was having to exercise a lot of mental discipline because I had all this stuff to throw at him,
[01:08:01.940 --> 01:08:05.940]  all these cool things I could do.
[01:08:05.940 --> 01:08:13.940]  But I had to be careful and only do one thing at a time and leave the rest until I get to it.
[01:08:13.940 --> 01:08:16.940]  And we eventually got to it.
[01:08:16.940 --> 01:08:20.940]  And that is my issue. You're right, Brett. You're exactly right.
[01:08:20.940 --> 01:08:23.940]  Because I'm always thinking ahead, what's going to happen if this happens?
[01:08:23.940 --> 01:08:26.940]  What's going to happen if that happens?
[01:08:26.940 --> 01:08:29.940]  Okay. But don't feel like we're criticizing you.
[01:08:29.940 --> 01:08:33.940]  Oh, I understand. I need the criticism.
[01:08:33.940 --> 01:08:36.940]  We all do that. This is not criticism.
[01:08:36.940 --> 01:08:42.940]  This is more in the way of getting you to notice where you're at.
[01:08:42.940 --> 01:08:43.940]  Yeah, coaching.
[01:08:43.940 --> 01:08:48.940]  You're fighting these guys. You're taking them on. That makes you rare in our experience.
[01:08:48.940 --> 01:08:49.940]  Right.
[01:08:49.940 --> 01:08:56.940]  So you're of value. You can be really annoying, and that's okay because you're of value.
[01:08:56.940 --> 01:09:00.940]  And everybody who is of value tends to be annoying.
[01:09:00.940 --> 01:09:01.940]  Right.
[01:09:01.940 --> 01:09:06.940]  Comes with the territory and never worry about that.
[01:09:06.940 --> 01:09:08.940]  Hey, I resemble that remark.
[01:09:08.940 --> 01:09:11.940]  Except for John from New York. He's down there.
[01:09:11.940 --> 01:09:16.940]  We're looking at John, and John, he don't get to be annoying.
[01:09:16.940 --> 01:09:19.940]  He's going to chew me out about that when we get him on.
[01:09:19.940 --> 01:09:22.940]  Uh-oh, I'm going to let y'all go if y'all can do that.
[01:09:22.940 --> 01:09:24.940]  Because I don't know how much time you got left,
[01:09:24.940 --> 01:09:28.940]  but I suspect there's a bunch of callers wanting to get on with y'all.
[01:09:28.940 --> 01:09:30.940]  Okay. Thank you, Jane.
[01:09:30.940 --> 01:09:33.940]  No, thank you. Y'all have a good night. We'll talk to you later.
[01:09:33.940 --> 01:09:36.940]  Okay. John, we're going to get to you in a minute.
[01:09:36.940 --> 01:09:37.940]  But Jason called last night.
[01:09:37.940 --> 01:09:43.940]  We promised if he'd call in, we'd bump him up to the top because he sat all night and never got on.
[01:09:43.940 --> 01:09:49.940]  Okay, Jason, what do you have for us today?
[01:09:49.940 --> 01:09:54.940]  Well, I don't know how much you remember from my last call a couple of weeks ago.
[01:09:54.940 --> 01:09:59.940]  You want me to go through quickly what's going on with my case, or do you remember what's going on?
[01:09:59.940 --> 01:10:03.940]  Yeah, give everybody a synopsis.
[01:10:03.940 --> 01:10:09.940]  All right, so June 1st, I was involved in a traffic stop,
[01:10:09.940 --> 01:10:14.940]  was issued a citation for no insurance and unsafe cutting while passing,
[01:10:14.940 --> 01:10:17.940]  and was issued a warning for speeding.
[01:10:17.940 --> 01:10:23.940]  To make a long story short, I pled not guilty to the unsafe cutting while passing,
[01:10:23.940 --> 01:10:29.940]  and the no insurance was dropped because I had proof of insurance.
[01:10:29.940 --> 01:10:33.940]  So then I filed some open records requests,
[01:10:33.940 --> 01:10:44.940]  and apparently I angered some people with those because now they turn that speeding warning into a citation.
[01:10:44.940 --> 01:10:49.940]  So that's basically where I'm at or where I was last time I talked to you.
[01:10:49.940 --> 01:10:55.940]  There's been a few developments since then.
[01:10:55.940 --> 01:11:00.940]  I filed a motion for adjournment because I've been having some health issues,
[01:11:00.940 --> 01:11:04.940]  and I had surgery on Monday, and they granted it.
[01:11:04.940 --> 01:11:11.940]  So my trial was supposed to be September 13th, and now they moved it to November 1st.
[01:11:11.940 --> 01:11:16.940]  So I have more time to work on some stuff here, I guess.
[01:11:16.940 --> 01:11:18.940]  That's one of the big developments here.
[01:11:18.940 --> 01:11:27.940]  The next one is I got some records back from my open records requests that were pretty interesting.
[01:11:27.940 --> 01:11:32.940]  I don't know if you recall, but I told you I put in a request for all communications
[01:11:32.940 --> 01:11:38.940]  from the State Patrol to the District Attorney's Office.
[01:11:38.940 --> 01:11:45.940]  Well, I got a bunch of e-mails involving that, and they're pretty interesting.
[01:11:45.940 --> 01:11:48.940]  That sounds like fun.
[01:11:48.940 --> 01:11:50.940]  Yeah.
[01:11:50.940 --> 01:11:53.940]  Yeah, interesting in what way? I'm curious.
[01:11:53.940 --> 01:11:56.940]  Well, I could read a couple of them too quickly.
[01:11:56.940 --> 01:11:59.940]  They're pretty short to give you an idea.
[01:11:59.940 --> 01:12:05.940]  There's a lot of them, but I could read you a couple that stuck out to me here.
[01:12:05.940 --> 01:12:07.940]  Would you like me to do that?
[01:12:07.940 --> 01:12:09.940]  Yes.
[01:12:09.940 --> 01:12:20.940]  So the first one is from the State Patrol officer who pulled me over going to the open records custodian.
[01:12:20.940 --> 01:12:26.940]  I spoke with the Washera DA, and from what I was told, Mr. Gross was much less pleasant with them
[01:12:26.940 --> 01:12:30.940]  and far more demanding than with us.
[01:12:30.940 --> 01:12:36.940]  The DA requested I reissue the speeding warning as a citation, which I, of course, honored his request.
[01:12:36.940 --> 01:12:38.940]  That will be getting mailed out tonight.
[01:12:38.940 --> 01:12:45.940]  I wanted to give you a heads-up as upon receipt, I'm sure it will not be received well.
[01:12:45.940 --> 01:12:48.940]  It gets a lot better than that.
[01:12:48.940 --> 01:12:52.940]  That, I think, shows some potential.
[01:12:52.940 --> 01:12:59.940]  That was the officer telling the prosecutor, this is a bad idea?
[01:12:59.940 --> 01:13:12.940]  That was the officer emailing the open records custodian and basically explaining the conversation he had with the DA
[01:13:12.940 --> 01:13:17.940]  and explaining that the DA had told him that I, in his words, wasn't pleasant with the DA.
[01:13:17.940 --> 01:13:19.940]  I don't know where he got that from.
[01:13:19.940 --> 01:13:26.940]  But anyways, and talking about how it actually gets better.
[01:13:26.940 --> 01:13:30.940]  There are other emails where they're talking about how they want to deflect my attention from them
[01:13:30.940 --> 01:13:34.940]  to the district attorney's office, and I could read you a couple more here.
[01:13:34.940 --> 01:13:37.940]  Oh, that would be good.
[01:13:37.940 --> 01:13:40.940]  Yeah, it gets pretty good here.
[01:13:40.940 --> 01:13:45.940]  Okay, this one is from the open records custodian, which I'm not sure I believe she's an attorney,
[01:13:45.940 --> 01:13:49.940]  so maybe she can get some bar grievances here.
[01:13:49.940 --> 01:13:53.940]  If you haven't already, please include a letter with the citation that states,
[01:13:53.940 --> 01:13:57.940]  at the DA's request, this citation is being sent to you.
[01:13:57.940 --> 01:14:00.940]  It will hopefully direct the focus back to the DA.
[01:14:00.940 --> 01:14:04.940]  Please circle up with the DA and let them know that Captain, whatever his name is,
[01:14:04.940 --> 01:14:09.940]  just request the letter be sent along with the citation.
[01:14:09.940 --> 01:14:11.940]  So they sent me, I don't know if you remember,
[01:14:11.940 --> 01:14:15.940]  they sent me a letter a couple days after they sent me that speeding citation
[01:14:15.940 --> 01:14:20.940]  explaining that it was at the request of the district attorney's office.
[01:14:20.940 --> 01:14:24.940]  Where is it that they're trying to turn your attention from?
[01:14:24.940 --> 01:14:29.940]  Like they're not wanting you to focus on something, you know, getting to look at the DA.
[01:14:29.940 --> 01:14:34.940]  Why are they wanting to try to bring you to the DA? From what?
[01:14:34.940 --> 01:14:39.940]  I think they want to stop the open records request because if I read a few more emails for you,
[01:14:39.940 --> 01:14:42.940]  they're pretty annoyed by my request.
[01:14:42.940 --> 01:14:45.940]  Let's see if I can find a good one here.
[01:14:45.940 --> 01:14:51.940]  Oh, that pesky transparency. Can't have that.
[01:14:51.940 --> 01:14:55.940]  Oh, I got a really good, okay, this one's a good one here.
[01:14:55.940 --> 01:15:00.940]  With the number of people, this is the state trooper emailing his sergeant.
[01:15:00.940 --> 01:15:02.940]  With the number of people, time, and resources,
[01:15:02.940 --> 01:15:08.940]  these increasingly frivolous requests are taken up as well as demeanor towards those involved.
[01:15:08.940 --> 01:15:11.940]  At what point can we say the requests have been filled
[01:15:11.940 --> 01:15:16.940]  and these continued requests are merely harassment or badgering?
[01:15:16.940 --> 01:15:19.940]  And then I got the reply from his sergeant.
[01:15:19.940 --> 01:15:21.940]  You can give me a call on this.
[01:15:21.940 --> 01:15:28.940]  However, if it is an open record and someone requested, we have to fulfill that request.
[01:15:28.940 --> 01:15:30.940]  So they're pretty annoyed with me.
[01:15:30.940 --> 01:15:33.940]  And you can tell by a lot of these, I won't go into all the emails
[01:15:33.940 --> 01:15:36.940]  because that would take a long time.
[01:15:36.940 --> 01:15:44.940]  The boss is obviously a lot smarter than the chatterboxes that are spending their time whining.
[01:15:44.940 --> 01:15:45.940]  I kind of noticed that.
[01:15:45.940 --> 01:15:51.940]  The boss is like, hey, it's an open records request, fulfill it.
[01:15:51.940 --> 01:15:57.940]  You might send them some cheese and tell them that I read your emails
[01:15:57.940 --> 01:16:01.940]  and I sent you this cheese to go with all the whine I found at the emails.
[01:16:01.940 --> 01:16:03.940]  Exactly.
[01:16:03.940 --> 01:16:07.940]  They sent me another email, I can't find it right now, but he was complaining about,
[01:16:07.940 --> 01:16:08.940]  oh, what's next?
[01:16:08.940 --> 01:16:12.940]  Is he going to want to know what type of boots I wear, what type of tires are in my car, that stuff?
[01:16:12.940 --> 01:16:20.940]  And I thought about it and I'm like, well, should I send him a request requesting all that stuff?
[01:16:20.940 --> 01:16:26.940]  That's exactly where my mind went.
[01:16:26.940 --> 01:16:34.940]  Well, I have found that requesting emails really gets them excited.
[01:16:34.940 --> 01:16:41.940]  It doesn't happen often and they get careless in their emails.
[01:16:41.940 --> 01:16:48.940]  Yeah, if I had time to read you more of them, you wouldn't believe it.
[01:16:48.940 --> 01:16:49.940]  It would be great.
[01:16:49.940 --> 01:16:51.940]  Can you send them to me?
[01:16:51.940 --> 01:16:53.940]  Yeah, I could.
[01:16:53.940 --> 01:16:57.940]  I could actually put them on the Telegram group, but I can post them again if you want.
[01:16:57.940 --> 01:16:58.940]  Oh, okay.
[01:16:58.940 --> 01:17:23.940]  I'll send them to you.
[01:17:23.940 --> 01:17:42.940]  Thank you.
[01:17:42.940 --> 01:18:00.940]  I love logos.
[01:18:00.940 --> 01:18:04.940]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.940 --> 01:18:07.940]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.940 --> 01:18:08.940]  I need my truth pick.
[01:18:08.940 --> 01:18:10.940]  I'd be lost without logos.
[01:18:10.940 --> 01:18:12.940]  I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:12.940 --> 01:18:15.940]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite
[01:18:15.940 --> 01:18:19.940]  and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:19.940 --> 01:18:21.940]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:21.940 --> 01:18:23.940]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:23.940 --> 01:18:26.940]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:18:26.940 --> 01:18:30.940]  When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, the first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:30.940 --> 01:18:34.940]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:18:34.940 --> 01:18:37.940]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.940 --> 01:18:42.940]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:42.940 --> 01:18:43.940]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:43.940 --> 01:18:44.940]  No.
[01:18:44.940 --> 01:18:46.940]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:46.940 --> 01:18:47.940]  No.
[01:18:47.940 --> 01:18:48.940]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:48.940 --> 01:18:49.940]  No.
[01:18:49.940 --> 01:18:50.940]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:50.940 --> 01:18:53.940]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:53.940 --> 01:18:55.940]  This is perfect.
[01:18:55.940 --> 01:18:56.940]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.940 --> 01:18:57.940]  We are welcome.
[01:18:57.940 --> 01:19:00.940]  Happy holidays, logos.
[01:19:00.940 --> 01:19:10.940]  This is LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:19:30.940 --> 01:19:50.940]  If I can't get everything I want, if I can't get a range, if I can't get everything I need,
[01:19:50.940 --> 01:20:02.940]  if I can't get a range, if the people of the world can't get happiness and peace,
[01:20:02.940 --> 01:20:13.940]  if I can't get a range, if we can't get all these crazy rewards,
[01:20:13.940 --> 01:20:29.940]  maybe I can get a range.
[01:20:29.940 --> 01:20:30.940]  Okay.
[01:20:30.940 --> 01:20:31.940]  We are back.
[01:20:31.940 --> 01:20:33.940]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio.
[01:20:33.940 --> 01:20:38.940]  And we're talking to Jason in Wisconsin.
[01:20:38.940 --> 01:20:41.940]  Okay, Jason, you got them all stirred up.
[01:20:41.940 --> 01:20:42.940]  You got their emails.
[01:20:42.940 --> 01:20:46.940]  Do they know you've got their emails?
[01:20:46.940 --> 01:20:51.940]  Yeah, because I requested her from the Open Records custodian at the State Patrol,
[01:20:51.940 --> 01:20:54.940]  and I could tell she was very hesitant to turn them over,
[01:20:54.940 --> 01:20:57.940]  but then it took them longer than my other requests.
[01:20:57.940 --> 01:21:02.940]  And they kind of scattered them around like out of order, so I got to go through.
[01:21:02.940 --> 01:21:04.940]  I still got more I haven't even read yet.
[01:21:04.940 --> 01:21:06.940]  They sent me quite a bit.
[01:21:06.940 --> 01:21:16.940]  Yeah, I requested emails from a JP, and they wouldn't give them to me in electronic format.
[01:21:16.940 --> 01:21:20.940]  They printed them, wanted to charge me for printing, and I told them absolutely not.
[01:21:20.940 --> 01:21:21.940]  I want them in their form.
[01:21:21.940 --> 01:21:23.940]  They're stored in.
[01:21:23.940 --> 01:21:33.940]  They called me down there, and they had a stack of papers sitting on the table a foot and a half tall.
[01:21:33.940 --> 01:21:41.940]  They had printed them all out, and I started going through them, and they were all scrambled.
[01:21:41.940 --> 01:21:47.940]  And Ann Diamond was the head of the administrative department,
[01:21:47.940 --> 01:21:51.940]  and I went through those, and I told her somebody scrambled these.
[01:21:51.940 --> 01:21:55.940]  She said that's the way they come out of the computer.
[01:21:55.940 --> 01:21:56.940]  Absolutely not.
[01:21:56.940 --> 01:21:59.940]  There is no way they come out of the computer this way.
[01:21:59.940 --> 01:22:00.940]  You guys scrambled them.
[01:22:00.940 --> 01:22:05.940]  I do not consider this responsive to my request.
[01:22:05.940 --> 01:22:13.940]  She was furious and turned and stormed out.
[01:22:13.940 --> 01:22:17.940]  It was glorious.
[01:22:17.940 --> 01:22:19.940]  Okay, but emails are real touching.
[01:22:19.940 --> 01:22:23.940]  And I just told Brett on the break that I will request the emails,
[01:22:23.940 --> 01:22:26.940]  and Brett's telling me how to do it with their head tech guy.
[01:22:26.940 --> 01:22:33.940]  I'll find out who he is and request the emails from him between this prosecutor,
[01:22:33.940 --> 01:22:37.940]  the chief of police, and the judge.
[01:22:37.940 --> 01:22:40.940]  This should get interesting.
[01:22:40.940 --> 01:22:47.940]  You may have just given me the key to open up this particular case.
[01:22:47.940 --> 01:22:52.940]  So the same way I requested these emails from the State Patrol,
[01:22:52.940 --> 01:22:55.940]  can I request them from the district attorney's office?
[01:22:55.940 --> 01:23:00.940]  Absolutely.
[01:23:00.940 --> 01:23:05.940]  But I got one more email here that I just found that I think is kind of important,
[01:23:05.940 --> 01:23:08.940]  and then I can move on from that because I got a couple other issues
[01:23:08.940 --> 01:23:12.940]  that I kind of wanted to get to, but mind if I read this one quick?
[01:23:12.940 --> 01:23:14.940]  Yeah, go ahead.
[01:23:14.940 --> 01:23:15.940]  All right.
[01:23:15.940 --> 01:23:18.940]  This has been nearly two months of open records request.
[01:23:18.940 --> 01:23:22.940]  This is from the State Patrol pulled me over to his sergeant.
[01:23:22.940 --> 01:23:25.940]  This has been nearly two months of open records request from Mr. Gross
[01:23:25.940 --> 01:23:28.940]  as a result of his traffic stop.
[01:23:28.940 --> 01:23:30.940]  I was informed by the district attorney's office,
[01:23:30.940 --> 01:23:34.940]  he has been doing the same to them, and in their words was awful to Amy,
[01:23:34.940 --> 01:23:37.940]  who I believe is at the clerk of court's office,
[01:23:37.940 --> 01:23:40.940]  to the point where her mentor had to take over the phone.
[01:23:40.940 --> 01:23:47.940]  The ADA denny informed me Mr. Gross was very arrogant during his pretrial conference
[01:23:47.940 --> 01:23:53.940]  and demanded his moving violation be removed because he did nothing wrong.
[01:23:53.940 --> 01:23:57.940]  So I think that combined with one of those other emails I read,
[01:23:57.940 --> 01:24:01.940]  doesn't that kind of show that they're retaliating with me,
[01:24:01.940 --> 01:24:08.940]  with the district attorney's speeding ticket as retaliation for what I'm doing here?
[01:24:08.940 --> 01:24:12.940]  I think you have good grounds for claiming retaliation.
[01:24:12.940 --> 01:24:19.940]  For the prosecutor to request that the policeman issue a criminal complaint against you,
[01:24:19.940 --> 01:24:24.940]  that's soliciting.
[01:24:24.940 --> 01:24:33.940]  This definitely goes to retaliation.
[01:24:33.940 --> 01:24:36.940]  When you really stick it to them, they tend to do stupid stuff.
[01:24:36.940 --> 01:24:43.940]  I would definitely look at filing retaliation against the prosecuting attorney.
[01:24:43.940 --> 01:24:46.940]  Something I found out interesting about the district attorney,
[01:24:46.940 --> 01:24:49.940]  about when he was campaigning for his election,
[01:24:49.940 --> 01:24:52.940]  he answered this questionnaire and I was reading it,
[01:24:52.940 --> 01:24:59.940]  and he was talking about how he wants to try not to give any plea agreements,
[01:24:59.940 --> 01:25:02.940]  and he wants to try to take everything he possibly can to trial,
[01:25:02.940 --> 01:25:05.940]  and he doesn't want to use plea agreements to avoid going to trial.
[01:25:05.940 --> 01:25:08.940]  That's something I found interesting about him.
[01:25:08.940 --> 01:25:14.940]  Did he follow up on that, or did he plea everybody out?
[01:25:14.940 --> 01:25:18.940]  When I had my pre-trial conference, he didn't offer me anything,
[01:25:18.940 --> 01:25:20.940]  and in other counties throughout the state,
[01:25:20.940 --> 01:25:24.940]  it's pretty standard that they offer to reduce your charge at the pre-trial conference,
[01:25:24.940 --> 01:25:29.940]  and he didn't offer me anything, so I thought that was kind of interesting.
[01:25:29.940 --> 01:25:33.940]  So maybe he was PO'd at you.
[01:25:33.940 --> 01:25:38.940]  Yeah, well, that was before I even started these open records requests and stuff.
[01:25:38.940 --> 01:25:41.940]  So he may be doing what he said.
[01:25:41.940 --> 01:25:43.940]  Yeah, he might. That's what I'm thinking.
[01:25:43.940 --> 01:25:48.940]  It looks like he's a young district attorney right out of law school, pretty much.
[01:25:48.940 --> 01:25:51.940]  He wants to make a name for himself or something.
[01:25:51.940 --> 01:25:54.940]  Have you bar-agreed him yet?
[01:25:54.940 --> 01:25:59.940]  I'm working on some bar agreements. I'm also going to have them done this weekend.
[01:25:59.940 --> 01:26:05.940]  I'm trying to think of everything I can hit him with here.
[01:26:05.940 --> 01:26:11.940]  You will probably get on their list of do not detain.
[01:26:11.940 --> 01:26:19.940]  Yeah, I'm thinking so, judging by how the state troopers are reacting to this.
[01:26:19.940 --> 01:26:23.940]  So do you have any other questions or comments?
[01:26:23.940 --> 01:26:26.940]  Yeah, I was looking at filing a motion to dismiss,
[01:26:26.940 --> 01:26:31.940]  and me and some other people in the telegram group are looking at the statute
[01:26:31.940 --> 01:26:34.940]  for the motion to dismiss in Wisconsin. It's a little confusing.
[01:26:34.940 --> 01:26:36.940]  Do you mind if I read it to you quick?
[01:26:36.940 --> 01:26:38.940]  Yeah, go ahead.
[01:26:38.940 --> 01:26:42.940]  This is the motion to dismiss in the traffic statute.
[01:26:42.940 --> 01:26:48.940]  So it says, defenses which could be taken by pleas of abatement in bar,
[01:26:48.940 --> 01:26:56.940]  the mirrors and motion to quash shall be raised by motion to dismiss,
[01:26:56.940 --> 01:27:01.940]  which motion shall be made before any trial on the marriage or be waived.
[01:27:01.940 --> 01:27:04.940]  So we're trying to figure out what exactly that means.
[01:27:04.940 --> 01:27:10.940]  That means you just have to get that motion in before the trial date.
[01:27:10.940 --> 01:27:16.940]  Okay, then I'm trying to figure out what grounds I should file for a motion to dismiss here.
[01:27:16.940 --> 01:27:21.940]  I mean, I'm sure there's multiple grounds, but should I just say,
[01:27:21.940 --> 01:27:24.940]  well, there's no complaint in my file, you know,
[01:27:24.940 --> 01:27:29.940]  should I file a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, that type of thing?
[01:27:29.940 --> 01:27:34.940]  I don't know enough about California traffic law.
[01:27:34.940 --> 01:27:40.940]  I'm sorry, Colorado traffic law. Does Colorado require that...
[01:27:40.940 --> 01:27:46.940]  Thomas, Wisconsin. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. You're right, Wisconsin.
[01:27:46.940 --> 01:27:50.940]  Why did I go to Colorado? Okay.
[01:27:50.940 --> 01:27:58.940]  Wisconsin law, do they require that a person arrested be taken before magistrate?
[01:27:58.940 --> 01:28:01.940]  That I'm not sure about.
[01:28:01.940 --> 01:28:08.940]  Okay, when you signed the citation, did you agree to appear before the trial judge
[01:28:08.940 --> 01:28:11.940]  or before some magistrate?
[01:28:11.940 --> 01:28:14.940]  I didn't sign a citation in Wisconsin.
[01:28:14.940 --> 01:28:18.940]  Most traffic, except for like DUIs and stuff, are civil.
[01:28:18.940 --> 01:28:25.940]  So they just gave me a printed out citation with the court date on it for my pretrial,
[01:28:25.940 --> 01:28:31.940]  or not my pretrial conference, but for my plea hearing.
[01:28:31.940 --> 01:28:36.940]  Was your plea hearing before some magistrate?
[01:28:36.940 --> 01:28:39.940]  Or was it before the trial judge?
[01:28:39.940 --> 01:28:44.940]  I actually sent my written plea by mail, but normally I believe it's before a court commissioner
[01:28:44.940 --> 01:28:47.940]  if you actually go on the date.
[01:28:47.940 --> 01:28:56.940]  What does Wisconsin's law say about an examining trial or a preliminary hearing?
[01:28:56.940 --> 01:28:59.940]  I believe, I've got to look into it a little bit more,
[01:28:59.940 --> 01:29:06.940]  but I believe in the traffic statutes it limits your ability to have preliminary hearings
[01:29:06.940 --> 01:29:12.940]  only for like criminal traffic things.
[01:29:12.940 --> 01:29:15.940]  Okay, so that's different in Wisconsin.
[01:29:15.940 --> 01:29:18.940]  Okay, do you have anything else for us?
[01:29:18.940 --> 01:29:23.940]  That's why with the motion to dismiss I was wondering if I should file a motion to dismiss
[01:29:23.940 --> 01:29:29.940]  for failure of state of claim because it's kind of the way the traffic rules work are civil in Wisconsin,
[01:29:29.940 --> 01:29:34.940]  so would that be a good thing to do?
[01:29:34.940 --> 01:29:42.940]  I don't think that, this is specific enough that I really wouldn't know how to address that
[01:29:42.940 --> 01:29:46.940]  without looking at the facts in the law involved.
[01:29:46.940 --> 01:29:52.940]  I'd have to study Wisconsin traffic law in order to be able to answer that particular question.
[01:29:52.940 --> 01:30:00.940]  Okay, hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[01:30:00.940 --> 01:30:04.940]  A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America.
[01:30:04.940 --> 01:30:08.940]  If you build an electrical smart grid, the hackers will come
[01:30:08.940 --> 01:30:11.940]  and they could cause a catastrophic blackout.
[01:30:11.940 --> 01:30:15.940]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment.
[01:30:15.940 --> 01:30:17.940]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:17.940 --> 01:30:21.940]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.940 --> 01:30:26.940]  Once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.940 --> 01:30:31.940]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.940 --> 01:30:34.940]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.940 --> 01:30:37.940]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[01:30:37.940 --> 01:30:41.940]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:30:41.940 --> 01:30:45.940]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:45.940 --> 01:30:49.940]  Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power
[01:30:49.940 --> 01:30:52.940]  into your home too with a smart grid.
[01:30:52.940 --> 01:30:56.940]  So they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely monitor
[01:30:56.940 --> 01:30:59.940]  electric use for efficiency and avoid grid failure.
[01:30:59.940 --> 01:31:03.940]  But cybersecurity expert David Chalk says not so fast.
[01:31:03.940 --> 01:31:06.940]  If we make the national power grid controllable through the web,
[01:31:06.940 --> 01:31:08.940]  hackers will have a field day.
[01:31:08.940 --> 01:31:12.940]  Working remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation,
[01:31:12.940 --> 01:31:15.940]  leaving us vulnerable to our enemies.
[01:31:15.940 --> 01:31:18.940]  I've long opposed smart meters for privacy and health reasons.
[01:31:18.940 --> 01:31:21.940]  The catastrophic failures caused by hackers?
[01:31:21.940 --> 01:31:23.940]  There's nothing smart about that.
[01:31:23.940 --> 01:31:26.940]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com,
[01:31:26.940 --> 01:31:30.940]  the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:30.940 --> 01:31:36.940]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.940 --> 01:31:38.940]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.940 --> 01:31:43.940]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.940 --> 01:31:46.940]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.940 --> 01:31:49.940]  Thousands of my fellow force responders are dying.
[01:31:49.940 --> 01:31:50.940]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.940 --> 01:31:51.940]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.940 --> 01:31:52.940]  I'm a New York City correction office.
[01:31:52.940 --> 01:31:53.940]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.940 --> 01:31:55.940]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.940 --> 01:31:58.940]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.940 --> 01:32:02.940]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:02.940 --> 01:32:05.940]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[01:32:05.940 --> 01:32:08.940]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[01:32:08.940 --> 01:32:10.940]  and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:10.940 --> 01:32:13.940]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.940 --> 01:32:15.940]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:32:15.940 --> 01:32:17.940]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:17.940 --> 01:32:20.940]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.940 --> 01:32:22.940]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[01:32:22.940 --> 01:32:25.940]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:25.940 --> 01:32:28.940]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:28.940 --> 01:32:31.940]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:31.940 --> 01:32:33.940]  that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:33.940 --> 01:32:35.940]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.940 --> 01:32:37.940]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[01:32:37.940 --> 01:32:40.940]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:40.940 --> 01:32:42.940]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:42.940 --> 01:32:45.940]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:32:45.940 --> 01:32:47.940]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[01:32:47.940 --> 01:32:50.940]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:50.940 --> 01:32:54.940]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:54.940 --> 01:33:01.940]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:01.940 --> 01:33:12.940]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:31.940 --> 01:34:00.940]  OK, we are back.
[01:34:00.940 --> 01:34:02.940]  Randy Kelton, Bret Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:34:02.940 --> 01:34:06.940]  And Jason, have we covered everything with you?
[01:34:06.940 --> 01:34:10.940]  We'll unmute you.
[01:34:10.940 --> 01:34:13.940]  Yeah, that's about it.
[01:34:13.940 --> 01:34:17.940]  I mean, I was thinking I'll try this motion to dismiss first,
[01:34:17.940 --> 01:34:21.940]  but I think my big move is going to be a declaratory judgment suit here.
[01:34:21.940 --> 01:34:23.940]  But I've got time to get to that.
[01:34:23.940 --> 01:34:25.940]  I guess I can call you next week about that.
[01:34:25.940 --> 01:34:27.940]  Yeah, if you do a declaratory judgment,
[01:34:27.940 --> 01:34:31.940]  you want to file a petition for abatement of this case,
[01:34:31.940 --> 01:34:37.940]  pending the outcome of the declaratory judgment.
[01:34:37.940 --> 01:34:40.940]  OK.
[01:34:40.940 --> 01:34:44.940]  Yeah, I do have some other questions, but I can get to those next week.
[01:34:44.940 --> 01:34:47.940]  I know you've got other callers, so I'll let you get to them.
[01:34:47.940 --> 01:34:52.940]  OK, thank you, Jason, and we'll talk to you next week.
[01:34:52.940 --> 01:34:54.940]  All right.
[01:34:54.940 --> 01:34:57.940]  OK, now we're going to John in New York.
[01:34:57.940 --> 01:34:59.940]  Hello, John.
[01:34:59.940 --> 01:35:00.940]  Hello.
[01:35:00.940 --> 01:35:01.940]  Good evening, Randy.
[01:35:01.940 --> 01:35:02.940]  Good evening.
[01:35:02.940 --> 01:35:05.940]  I was only teasing when I picked on you earlier.
[01:35:05.940 --> 01:35:07.940]  That's all right.
[01:35:07.940 --> 01:35:10.940]  I'm used to it.
[01:35:10.940 --> 01:35:16.940]  Remember the gentleman about he had a rash,
[01:35:16.940 --> 01:35:19.940]  and he had questions about non-ionizing radiation?
[01:35:19.940 --> 01:35:21.940]  Ask him the questions you want,
[01:35:21.940 --> 01:35:25.940]  because that's all I've ever done is what he was talking about.
[01:35:25.940 --> 01:35:27.940]  OK.
[01:35:27.940 --> 01:35:32.940]  Can you remember any questions that you might have that I can answer for you?
[01:35:32.940 --> 01:35:40.940]  Well, the non-ionizing radiation causing skin irritation,
[01:35:40.940 --> 01:35:52.940]  is there any evidence of that being symptomatic to these swabs, these nasal swabs?
[01:35:52.940 --> 01:35:59.940]  Well, first of all, non-ionizing radiation can cause the skin problem that he has,
[01:35:59.940 --> 01:36:05.940]  and the utility companies will try to tell you,
[01:36:05.940 --> 01:36:08.940]  oh, but there's not enough information about that.
[01:36:08.940 --> 01:36:15.940]  There have been more than enough studies to prove all the harm that non-ionizing radiation does,
[01:36:15.940 --> 01:36:25.940]  non-ionizing radiation being cell phones, cell towers, Wi-Fi, 5G, smart meters, and so on.
[01:36:25.940 --> 01:36:26.940]  All right.
[01:36:26.940 --> 01:36:31.940]  Now, as far as the swabby, there have been experts,
[01:36:31.940 --> 01:36:36.940]  and these are real doctors with real expertise in a particular field.
[01:36:36.940 --> 01:36:42.940]  And the swab and the mask, at one point or another,
[01:36:42.940 --> 01:36:46.940]  were all said to have been, not all said to have been contaminated,
[01:36:46.940 --> 01:36:50.940]  but many of the ones they examined were contaminated.
[01:36:50.940 --> 01:36:53.940]  The swabs, they didn't want them poking them up into,
[01:36:53.940 --> 01:37:02.940]  high up into the noses of people, up into the sinuses,
[01:37:02.940 --> 01:37:06.940]  because it's near the brain, and it's very dangerous to do that.
[01:37:06.940 --> 01:37:08.940]  The swabs were contaminated.
[01:37:08.940 --> 01:37:15.940]  They think, at the time, and there are doctors like Dr. Lee Merritt,
[01:37:15.940 --> 01:37:19.940]  Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Sherry Tenpenny,
[01:37:19.940 --> 01:37:25.940]  who are experts in that particular field who can be expert witnesses for that gentleman.
[01:37:25.940 --> 01:37:28.940]  I'm sure that they probably would do that.
[01:37:28.940 --> 01:37:31.940]  The swabs were contaminated with virus.
[01:37:31.940 --> 01:37:38.940]  There is a correlation between 5G and the COVID virus.
[01:37:38.940 --> 01:37:44.940]  5G has been shown to be activated, or excuse me,
[01:37:44.940 --> 01:37:50.940]  5G has been shown to activate the COVID virus in individuals
[01:37:50.940 --> 01:37:56.940]  by making it easier for the virus to get into the cells of the body
[01:37:56.940 --> 01:37:58.940]  and infect the person.
[01:37:58.940 --> 01:38:05.940]  In Wuhan, China, where they implemented 5G very early in the game,
[01:38:05.940 --> 01:38:12.940]  they noticed that the COVID virus was a factor, and it spread quickly.
[01:38:12.940 --> 01:38:15.940]  They think that it's because of the 5G,
[01:38:15.940 --> 01:38:21.940]  and there's enough evidence to show that that's probably very true.
[01:38:21.940 --> 01:38:25.940]  When I say probably true, it is true.
[01:38:25.940 --> 01:38:31.940]  There is a correlation between the 5G and the virus.
[01:38:31.940 --> 01:38:35.940]  It makes it easier for the virus to get into the body.
[01:38:35.940 --> 01:38:44.940]  If he lives in a building where there are antennas and transmitters,
[01:38:44.940 --> 01:38:50.940]  there's a real soup there, and it's a combination of frequencies,
[01:38:50.940 --> 01:38:53.940]  and that could be part of his problem.
[01:38:53.940 --> 01:38:55.940]  Now, you made a comment.
[01:38:55.940 --> 01:38:59.940]  You said that we've been exposed to the radiation from the cosmos,
[01:38:59.940 --> 01:39:04.940]  from astrophysics, the supernovas, and the exploding stars,
[01:39:04.940 --> 01:39:08.940]  but what you don't understand is, and most people don't,
[01:39:08.940 --> 01:39:11.940]  it's not their job to understand it,
[01:39:11.940 --> 01:39:17.940]  that that type of radiation mankind has been exposed to for years,
[01:39:17.940 --> 01:39:21.940]  and it's the recent kind that we haven't had enough time
[01:39:21.940 --> 01:39:27.940]  to develop a tolerance for that is causing all this trouble.
[01:39:27.940 --> 01:39:31.940]  Now, just like two and a half years ago, and I'm almost done with this,
[01:39:31.940 --> 01:39:34.940]  about two and a half years ago when I started calling you
[01:39:34.940 --> 01:39:40.940]  and telling you that the COVID vaccines were going to kill a lot of people,
[01:39:40.940 --> 01:39:44.940]  and I know you thought I was nuts, but it turns out that...
[01:39:44.940 --> 01:39:47.940]  Let me explain that part.
[01:39:47.940 --> 01:39:50.940]  I thought you were nuts before you started talking about that.
[01:39:50.940 --> 01:39:53.940]  Okay.
[01:39:53.940 --> 01:39:59.940]  But as it turns out, everything that I said within these last two and a half years
[01:39:59.940 --> 01:40:01.940]  turned out to be true.
[01:40:01.940 --> 01:40:03.940]  I've not been wrong about one of them.
[01:40:03.940 --> 01:40:07.940]  Now I'm going to lay another one on you that you're going to think I'm nuts for.
[01:40:07.940 --> 01:40:12.940]  You're familiar with radio broadcast and transmitting signals?
[01:40:12.940 --> 01:40:14.940]  Yes.
[01:40:14.940 --> 01:40:18.940]  There is proof, there is evidence, and a lot of it,
[01:40:18.940 --> 01:40:24.940]  and I won't get into it, but just to say that...
[01:40:24.940 --> 01:40:29.940]  What you're normally used to is when a bacteria or a virus spreads
[01:40:29.940 --> 01:40:34.940]  and people catch it and they get it physically into their system somehow
[01:40:34.940 --> 01:40:37.940]  and it makes them sick.
[01:40:37.940 --> 01:40:42.940]  Well, there is a way to make people sick without transmitting the virus
[01:40:42.940 --> 01:40:51.940]  or the bacteria, but to transmit the signal, the frequency that those operate at
[01:40:51.940 --> 01:40:56.940]  and every virus, every bacteria, every cell in the body has an electrical signature,
[01:40:56.940 --> 01:41:00.940]  just like a fingerprint, and it operates at a certain frequency
[01:41:00.940 --> 01:41:04.940]  and a certain modulation and certain this and certain that,
[01:41:04.940 --> 01:41:10.940]  that you can actually transmit a disease not with the virus, not with the bacteria,
[01:41:10.940 --> 01:41:15.940]  but with the frequencies from that virus or bacteria.
[01:41:15.940 --> 01:41:20.940]  There's a lot of evidence that shows that, and I'm going to stick my neck out
[01:41:20.940 --> 01:41:23.940]  and say it's not evidence really, I think it's proof,
[01:41:23.940 --> 01:41:26.940]  but you're going to think I'm crazy, just like you did two years ago.
[01:41:26.940 --> 01:41:32.940]  There's some indication, you've heard of life machines, I'm sure.
[01:41:32.940 --> 01:41:38.940]  Yeah, Royal Life was a brilliant man and they destroyed him
[01:41:38.940 --> 01:41:40.940]  and they destroyed his years.
[01:41:40.940 --> 01:41:44.940]  He could cure most any disease with the right frequency.
[01:41:44.940 --> 01:41:51.940]  And the reason I brought that up is because he said these viruses and bacteria
[01:41:51.940 --> 01:41:55.940]  responded to certain frequencies and the frequencies he was using,
[01:41:55.940 --> 01:42:04.940]  they responded to and it caused them to explode or it destroyed the bacteria virus,
[01:42:04.940 --> 01:42:09.940]  but the point is they are sensitive to certain frequencies.
[01:42:09.940 --> 01:42:10.940]  That's right.
[01:42:10.940 --> 01:42:15.940]  So yeah, you might be able to wake one up or make it more active.
[01:42:15.940 --> 01:42:23.940]  Remember back in the 70s when the 700,000 volt power lines came into question
[01:42:23.940 --> 01:42:27.940]  and the utility companies argued that they don't cause cancer
[01:42:27.940 --> 01:42:30.940]  and they don't cause this and they don't cause that.
[01:42:30.940 --> 01:42:32.940]  Well, that's all fall.
[01:42:32.940 --> 01:42:36.940]  Yeah, I've got one person I've talked to for years.
[01:42:36.940 --> 01:42:41.940]  He's the one I mentioned earlier who is really on to this issue
[01:42:41.940 --> 01:42:47.940]  because he had to retire because of the damage it caused.
[01:42:47.940 --> 01:42:51.940]  Yeah, and people have been killed for less.
[01:42:51.940 --> 01:42:59.940]  Anyway, these 765,000 kilovolt or 765 kilovolt lines,
[01:42:59.940 --> 01:43:05.940]  it's 60 cycles, that causes damage to the human immune system among other things
[01:43:05.940 --> 01:43:11.940]  and it's a proven fact and the cell phone companies are still arguing
[01:43:11.940 --> 01:43:14.940]  that the cell phone frequencies don't cause cancer.
[01:43:14.940 --> 01:43:15.940]  You know what they do?
[01:43:15.940 --> 01:43:17.940]  They're very smart.
[01:43:17.940 --> 01:43:20.940]  They have a five-year study and then they show everybody,
[01:43:20.940 --> 01:43:26.940]  see, we didn't get any appreciable increase in cancer in these five years.
[01:43:26.940 --> 01:43:28.940]  So that's fall.
[01:43:28.940 --> 01:43:33.940]  No, they had to go 10 years and they're very smart to stop it at five years
[01:43:33.940 --> 01:43:39.940]  because it takes 10 years for the cancer to evidence itself in a study like that.
[01:43:39.940 --> 01:43:41.940]  So they're very clever.
[01:43:41.940 --> 01:43:44.940]  I hear the music coming up.
[01:43:44.940 --> 01:43:45.940]  Okay, hang on.
[01:43:45.940 --> 01:43:47.940]  We're going to our last segment.
[01:43:47.940 --> 01:43:52.940]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Root of Law Radio.
[01:43:52.940 --> 01:43:55.940]  We'll be back in three or four seconds.
[01:43:55.940 --> 01:43:57.940]  I've got to fill in a little space here.
[01:43:57.940 --> 01:43:59.940]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:27.940 --> 01:44:29.940]  Thank you very much.
[01:44:57.940 --> 01:45:03.940]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.940 --> 01:45:06.940]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:06.940 --> 01:45:11.940]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how
[01:45:11.940 --> 01:45:14.940]  in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.940 --> 01:45:18.940]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.940 --> 01:45:22.940]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.940 --> 01:45:25.940]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course.
[01:45:25.940 --> 01:45:27.940]  And now you can too.
[01:45:27.940 --> 01:45:30.940]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:30.940 --> 01:45:33.940]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.940 --> 01:45:38.940]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:38.940 --> 01:45:42.940]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.940 --> 01:45:47.940]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:47.940 --> 01:45:51.940]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.940 --> 01:45:55.940]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:55.940 --> 01:46:22.940]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.940 --> 01:46:25.940]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:25.940 --> 01:46:28.940]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio,
[01:46:28.940 --> 01:46:30.940]  and we're talking to John in New York.
[01:46:30.940 --> 01:46:32.940]  Okay, go ahead, John.
[01:46:32.940 --> 01:46:37.940]  Okay, so I don't fault you for thinking that I was nuts two years ago
[01:46:37.940 --> 01:46:39.940]  because some of the things that I was saying,
[01:46:39.940 --> 01:46:45.940]  it sounds like the Twilight Zone, but we are living in the Twilight Zone.
[01:46:45.940 --> 01:46:50.940]  Do you fault me for still thinking you're crazy?
[01:46:50.940 --> 01:46:52.940]  No, no.
[01:46:52.940 --> 01:46:54.940]  Okay.
[01:46:54.940 --> 01:46:57.940]  Okay, no, I don't fault you because it was crazy sounding,
[01:46:57.940 --> 01:47:00.940]  and now I'm hitting more crazy stuff.
[01:47:00.940 --> 01:47:06.940]  So to help that gentleman, I would say that gentleman that you know,
[01:47:06.940 --> 01:47:10.940]  there's a few that I'm familiar with, I'd have to look their names up.
[01:47:10.940 --> 01:47:15.940]  They're experts at measuring cell towers and smart meters
[01:47:15.940 --> 01:47:18.940]  and all these different emitting frequencies.
[01:47:18.940 --> 01:47:25.940]  And the reason why those frequencies, like smart meters, are so damaging
[01:47:25.940 --> 01:47:31.940]  is because they're not the standard radio waves like an AM or FM TV tower
[01:47:31.940 --> 01:47:35.940]  where the wave is more or less constant.
[01:47:35.940 --> 01:47:38.940]  These are emitted at high bursts.
[01:47:38.940 --> 01:47:43.940]  They're rather at high speed, and their bursts are very intense,
[01:47:43.940 --> 01:47:49.940]  and they can do hundreds of thousands of bursts per day.
[01:47:49.940 --> 01:47:54.940]  So when the utility towers, like cell phone towers, or smart meters rather,
[01:47:54.940 --> 01:48:00.940]  when they say, oh, it's just three or four times an hour, that's a lie.
[01:48:00.940 --> 01:48:03.940]  They emit bursts that are high intensity
[01:48:03.940 --> 01:48:10.940]  and many tens and hundreds of thousands of impulses per minute or hour
[01:48:10.940 --> 01:48:12.940]  or whatever it happens to be.
[01:48:12.940 --> 01:48:17.940]  And it's such high speed that the body can't handle it.
[01:48:17.940 --> 01:48:22.940]  It kills bees. It kills pets. It kills people.
[01:48:22.940 --> 01:48:24.940]  It interferes with your pacemaker.
[01:48:24.940 --> 01:48:29.940]  If you've got a pacemaker and there's a smart meter in your house, too bad for you.
[01:48:29.940 --> 01:48:34.940]  If you've got diabetes and you suddenly notice it's worse, too bad for you.
[01:48:34.940 --> 01:48:36.940]  They insist that they're telling you...
[01:48:36.940 --> 01:48:43.940]  Do you have data on the diabetes and heart connection?
[01:48:43.940 --> 01:48:46.940]  I probably do. Yeah, I got data on everything.
[01:48:46.940 --> 01:48:49.940]  The trouble is my files are so... I've got terabytes of information,
[01:48:49.940 --> 01:48:51.940]  and I'd have to get some.
[01:48:51.940 --> 01:48:55.940]  And it's going to be six months to two years old,
[01:48:55.940 --> 01:48:58.940]  but it will give you the right place to start,
[01:48:58.940 --> 01:49:01.940]  and the truth that they contain hasn't changed.
[01:49:01.940 --> 01:49:05.940]  But they have updated it, and it's even worse now, I'm sure.
[01:49:05.940 --> 01:49:10.940]  Now, I can give you names of three or four experts in addition to your expert
[01:49:10.940 --> 01:49:13.940]  that can help that gentleman with his case.
[01:49:13.940 --> 01:49:16.940]  Good. Good. Send that to me, and I will get you two connected.
[01:49:16.940 --> 01:49:24.940]  Okay. On the air, I'll say America's frontline doctors, that one big one,
[01:49:24.940 --> 01:49:28.940]  Robert Malone. He is brilliant.
[01:49:28.940 --> 01:49:35.940]  Dr. Lee Merritt, she is absolutely stunning in her ability.
[01:49:35.940 --> 01:49:40.940]  And these are the people that I was quoting you before,
[01:49:40.940 --> 01:49:43.940]  and nobody believed me at all.
[01:49:43.940 --> 01:49:45.940]  They said, well, he's just another nut.
[01:49:45.940 --> 01:49:51.940]  And another one is, let's see, Dr. Lee Merritt, Dr. Robert Malone,
[01:49:51.940 --> 01:50:02.940]  America's frontline doctors, and Dr. Robert Malone, and Dr. Sherry Kenpenny.
[01:50:02.940 --> 01:50:06.940]  Dr. Sherry Kenpenny, she's another brilliant doctor,
[01:50:06.940 --> 01:50:12.940]  and she can help with the infected swabs and the infected masks.
[01:50:12.940 --> 01:50:14.940]  They found chemical contaminants.
[01:50:14.940 --> 01:50:17.940]  That doesn't mean they're all contaminated,
[01:50:17.940 --> 01:50:22.940]  but they did find chemical contaminants that were related to parasites
[01:50:22.940 --> 01:50:28.940]  that caused Morgellons disease, which is something you don't want to get,
[01:50:28.940 --> 01:50:31.940]  and a few other things.
[01:50:31.940 --> 01:50:35.940]  And if I remember right, part of those contaminants,
[01:50:35.940 --> 01:50:41.940]  they said that the swabbies in the PCR test were,
[01:50:41.940 --> 01:50:44.940]  they contained spike proteins,
[01:50:44.940 --> 01:50:50.940]  which is what makes you sick with COVID vaccine and COVID the virus.
[01:50:50.940 --> 01:50:52.940]  That's exactly what makes you sick.
[01:50:52.940 --> 01:50:56.940]  And most people now that are getting sick from COVID-19
[01:50:56.940 --> 01:50:59.940]  are the ones who have gotten the shot.
[01:50:59.940 --> 01:51:02.940]  And the more shots they get, the sicker they are.
[01:51:02.940 --> 01:51:09.940]  And that's because the shots are loaded with spike proteins that the virus,
[01:51:09.940 --> 01:51:11.940]  that's the virus.
[01:51:11.940 --> 01:51:16.940]  That's what causes COVID-19 to make you sick, the spike protein.
[01:51:16.940 --> 01:51:18.940]  And they put it in the shot,
[01:51:18.940 --> 01:51:22.940]  and then the body produces those spike proteins,
[01:51:22.940 --> 01:51:25.940]  and there's no off switch.
[01:51:25.940 --> 01:51:27.940]  That's why, as time goes on,
[01:51:27.940 --> 01:51:29.940]  and you're going to think I'm nuts if you're saying this,
[01:51:29.940 --> 01:51:33.940]  but you think they believe that over a million people
[01:51:33.940 --> 01:51:36.940]  now have been killed by the vaccine in this country alone,
[01:51:36.940 --> 01:51:41.940]  and that 10,000 people per day worldwide are getting sick
[01:51:41.940 --> 01:51:44.940]  and dying from the vaccine worldwide.
[01:51:44.940 --> 01:51:47.940]  Let me make a comment here.
[01:51:47.940 --> 01:51:54.940]  I was listening to a program on public radio talking about people who develop prosthesis.
[01:51:54.940 --> 01:51:59.940]  And right at the end of the presentation,
[01:51:59.940 --> 01:52:06.940]  the commentator or the expert mentioned that there has been an increase
[01:52:06.940 --> 01:52:11.940]  in prosthetic requirements or cause for prosthetics
[01:52:11.940 --> 01:52:20.940]  in younger people with amputees due to blood clots that were COVID-19 related.
[01:52:20.940 --> 01:52:22.940]  Oh, I can believe that, yeah.
[01:52:22.940 --> 01:52:25.940]  And they didn't say caused by COVID-19.
[01:52:25.940 --> 01:52:27.940]  They said related.
[01:52:27.940 --> 01:52:29.940]  Well, here's how that goes.
[01:52:29.940 --> 01:52:36.940]  Real quick, the blood clots that they're finding aren't necessarily made of blood.
[01:52:36.940 --> 01:52:44.940]  The last I knew, they believed that the blood clots are mostly made of amyloid protein,
[01:52:44.940 --> 01:52:51.940]  and that word amyloid pops up in Alzheimer's related to prions,
[01:52:51.940 --> 01:52:57.940]  which are bent protein, and they found prions in the shot.
[01:52:57.940 --> 01:53:04.940]  So the allegation is either by hook or by crook, either deliberately or accidentally,
[01:53:04.940 --> 01:53:11.940]  prions are contained in the COVID vaccines, some of them or all of them,
[01:53:11.940 --> 01:53:18.940]  and those prions can cause Alzheimer's and dementia and it literally melts your brain.
[01:53:18.940 --> 01:53:23.940]  And they think that in a few years, Alzheimer's is going to be,
[01:53:23.940 --> 01:53:28.940]  I mean, you think it's bad now with all the aluminum in the chemtrails.
[01:53:28.940 --> 01:53:30.940]  Well, get ready.
[01:53:30.940 --> 01:53:34.940]  They think that just like a ticking time bomb,
[01:53:34.940 --> 01:53:39.940]  these COVID vaccines are going to result in a lot of deaths worldwide,
[01:53:39.940 --> 01:53:43.940]  and it's not just going to be a million plus like it is in this country.
[01:53:43.940 --> 01:53:50.940]  They think, and it's hard to tell how many people die because I watched the CDC
[01:53:50.940 --> 01:53:55.940]  falsifying the information right online in real time.
[01:53:55.940 --> 01:54:05.940]  I saw it with my own eyes, and they were trading vaccine injuries that resulted in death
[01:54:05.940 --> 01:54:09.940]  for vaccine injuries that resulted in just injury.
[01:54:09.940 --> 01:54:15.940]  So they were removing the death and hiding them, and that could be seen in real time.
[01:54:15.940 --> 01:54:22.940]  Oh yeah, where they said death was a side effect, death was a negative reaction
[01:54:22.940 --> 01:54:26.940]  for something instead of being called death.
[01:54:26.940 --> 01:54:31.940]  Well, what they were doing was they were hiding the deaths with just adverse reactions,
[01:54:31.940 --> 01:54:36.940]  you know, like coughing or fever and so on.
[01:54:36.940 --> 01:54:42.940]  They were hiding the deaths. They blew up the numbers of COVID deaths.
[01:54:42.940 --> 01:54:46.940]  A very few number of people actually died from COVID-19.
[01:54:46.940 --> 01:54:52.940]  Now, most of the people are dying from the vaccine, just like I said it would happen.
[01:54:52.940 --> 01:54:59.940]  So there's so much information, and there's new information right now that we can't even get to.
[01:54:59.940 --> 01:55:01.940]  I mean, we don't have time.
[01:55:01.940 --> 01:55:06.940]  But if you've got another question, ask me, and I'll shut up now, and just ask me any questions you want,
[01:55:06.940 --> 01:55:09.940]  I should know the answer.
[01:55:09.940 --> 01:55:14.940]  No, I'm trying to process all the information you've thrown at me.
[01:55:14.940 --> 01:55:18.940]  It's quite a bit. There is quite a bit.
[01:55:18.940 --> 01:55:23.940]  Send me an email, and I will forward it to, I've got a couple people.
[01:55:23.940 --> 01:55:26.940]  I'm going to forward it to the EMF guy.
[01:55:26.940 --> 01:55:36.940]  And to the caller earlier, he's going to send me an email, and the one from Pennsylvania.
[01:55:36.940 --> 01:55:45.940]  No, not the one from Pennsylvania. She was doing the, what was that act, Brett?
[01:55:45.940 --> 01:55:47.940]  The CARES Act. That was Florence.
[01:55:47.940 --> 01:55:49.940]  Yeah, the CARES Act, yeah.
[01:55:49.940 --> 01:55:52.940]  Unfortunately, got disconnected.
[01:55:52.940 --> 01:55:55.940]  I'm hoping she sends me an email.
[01:55:55.940 --> 01:55:58.940]  Hey, Randy, Randy, that reminds me.
[01:55:58.940 --> 01:56:09.940]  Because the emergency use authorization, the FDA did not approve a shot, a test, or the vaccine.
[01:56:09.940 --> 01:56:18.940]  And because of that, automatically, the companies like Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson,
[01:56:18.940 --> 01:56:26.940]  and anybody else who forced the shots on people, they were forcing experimental drugs on them.
[01:56:26.940 --> 01:56:34.940]  And as such, they have violated the Nuremberg Code, the Geneva Convention, and federal laws.
[01:56:34.940 --> 01:56:43.940]  And they were putting blank paper in the vaccine vial bottles, you know, in the boxes with the bottles,
[01:56:43.940 --> 01:56:47.940]  and they were not disclosing what was in there. That is against federal law.
[01:56:47.940 --> 01:56:52.940]  You have a right to know what's in a medicine, what's in a shot, and they weren't doing that.
[01:56:52.940 --> 01:56:57.940]  So they've opened themselves up for lawsuits, whether they want to think so or not.
[01:56:57.940 --> 01:57:02.940]  I understand they have a $3 trillion lawsuit against them now.
[01:57:02.940 --> 01:57:07.940]  Oh, there's lawsuits. They're starting to come up against the doctors,
[01:57:07.940 --> 01:57:12.940]  and there's going to be pharmaceutical company lawsuits. They think they're exempt. They're not.
[01:57:12.940 --> 01:57:16.940]  Because they have falsified information left and right.
[01:57:16.940 --> 01:57:20.940]  I don't think there was one truth that any of the pharmaceutical companies told,
[01:57:20.940 --> 01:57:22.940]  or any of the hospitals for that matter,
[01:57:22.940 --> 01:57:26.940]  wait until you see the lawsuits against the hospitals for remdesivir.
[01:57:26.940 --> 01:57:32.940]  They knew, Mr. Fauci knew that remdesivir kills 54% of the people that's treated with it.
[01:57:32.940 --> 01:57:36.940]  It destroys the kidneys and the liver. And they knew that.
[01:57:36.940 --> 01:57:42.940]  And he did the same thing with AZT during the HIV time.
[01:57:42.940 --> 01:57:47.940]  Mr. Fauci is guilty of mega-medicine.
[01:57:47.940 --> 01:57:51.940]  So that's good.
[01:57:51.940 --> 01:57:55.940]  Try to prove that one that he's innocent. Yeah, right.
[01:57:55.940 --> 01:58:02.940]  So anyway, that's why he stepped down. He can see the mask coming.
[01:58:02.940 --> 01:58:05.940]  Good. I hope he's right in the middle of it.
[01:58:05.940 --> 01:58:09.940]  You're going to see lawsuit after lawsuit.
[01:58:09.940 --> 01:58:12.940]  We already are. They're beginning to build up.
[01:58:12.940 --> 01:58:17.940]  And as I understand, the insurance companies are beginning to balk
[01:58:17.940 --> 01:58:23.940]  and get real excited because they're getting hammered so much.
[01:58:23.940 --> 01:58:26.940]  This is beginning to come apart.
[01:58:26.940 --> 01:58:32.940]  Okay, we are out of time. Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:32.940 --> 01:58:35.940]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain.
[01:58:35.940 --> 01:58:41.940]  We'll be back next week at our regular time, 8 o'clock Central, Thursday and Friday.
[01:58:41.940 --> 01:58:45.940]  And check out Eddie Craig. He's back on the air, 8 o'clock Central, Monday.
[01:58:45.940 --> 01:58:49.940]  Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:58:49.940 --> 01:58:54.940]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible
[01:58:54.940 --> 01:58:57.940]  called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.940 --> 01:59:01.940]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:01.940 --> 01:59:05.940]  what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God
[01:59:05.940 --> 01:59:07.940]  and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:07.940 --> 01:59:10.940]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:10.940 --> 01:59:19.940]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:19.940 --> 01:59:25.940]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:25.940 --> 01:59:29.940]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.940 --> 01:59:32.940]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.940 --> 01:59:35.940]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:35.940 --> 01:59:40.940]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.940 --> 01:59:49.940]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.940 --> 01:59:59.940]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.