[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.500 --> 00:09.500]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.500 --> 00:11.000]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:11.000 --> 00:16.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.500 --> 00:18.500]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.500 --> 00:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:26.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.500 --> 00:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:34.500]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.500 --> 00:38.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[00:38.000 --> 00:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.000 --> 00:45.500]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:45.500 --> 00:47.500]  Spar, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.500 --> 00:51.000]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.000 --> 00:54.000]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.000 --> 00:56.500]  Spar with an extra P.
[00:56.500 --> 01:03.000]  S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:03.000 --> 01:08.500]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion.
[01:08.500 --> 01:10.500]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.500 --> 01:14.500]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.500 --> 01:17.500]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government,
[01:17.500 --> 01:21.000]  we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:21.000 --> 01:25.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.500 --> 01:35.000]  Pressure, we usually associate it with stress and negativity,
[01:35.000 --> 01:37.500]  but sometimes a bit of pressure can be healing.
[01:37.500 --> 01:42.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you how conditions like nausea can be cured
[01:42.000 --> 01:45.500]  using the traditional Chinese therapy known as acupressure.
[01:45.500 --> 01:48.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.000 --> 01:51.500]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.500 --> 01:56.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.500 --> 02:01.500]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.500 --> 02:04.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.000 --> 02:07.500]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[02:07.500 --> 02:11.500]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:11.500 --> 02:14.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:14.000 --> 02:19.000]  Acupressure is an ancient practice that uses finger or hand pressure
[02:19.000 --> 02:22.000]  to cure everything from headaches to constipation.
[02:22.000 --> 02:24.500]  The pressure is applied to points known as meridians
[02:24.500 --> 02:27.500]  that are believed to control the flow of energy in the human body.
[02:27.500 --> 02:32.500]  Acupressure offers a simple cure for nausea you might try the next time you get a queasy stomach
[02:32.500 --> 02:34.500]  or a case of motion sickness.
[02:34.500 --> 02:38.000]  Simply apply moderate pressure to the point known as P6.
[02:38.000 --> 02:42.000]  You'll find it on the inside of your wrist, about two fingers' width down from your palm.
[02:42.000 --> 02:48.000]  Placing pressure on the P6 point works on the same principle as those pricey anti-nausea wristbands,
[02:48.000 --> 02:51.000]  but this relief is free and always on hand.
[02:51.000 --> 03:13.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:21.000 --> 03:23.500]  Get your rights violated or you all get shot.
[03:23.500 --> 03:26.000]  I'm sick of people being victimized by criminal cops,
[03:26.000 --> 03:28.500]  psychopathic predators terrorize the neighborhood block.
[03:28.500 --> 03:31.000]  They're equipped with pepper spray, make-up, tasers, and glass.
[03:31.000 --> 03:33.500]  They're like serial killers acting out subliminal thoughts.
[03:33.500 --> 03:36.000]  Forget what you talk, these cops have got a license to kill.
[03:36.000 --> 03:38.500]  Witness intimidation means that they can use it at will.
[03:38.500 --> 03:41.500]  Code of silence means that the pigs will never let out a quill.
[03:41.500 --> 03:44.500]  And if they go to court, they know the judge will make them a deal, for real.
[03:44.500 --> 03:47.000]  That's why they stoppin' me, lockin' me up and stoppin' me.
[03:47.000 --> 03:51.000]  I'm confiscatin' my property, talkin' in my demography, makin' a poor commodity,
[03:51.000 --> 03:52.000]  procidin' off of poverty.
[03:52.000 --> 03:55.000]  It's going to policy, support, prison, economy, yeah.
[03:55.000 --> 03:57.000]  No one makes money when the violence stops.
[03:57.000 --> 03:59.000]  Hatin' brutality is the way to make a criminal...
[03:59.000 --> 04:00.000]  Hi, folks. Good evening.
[04:00.000 --> 04:04.000]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[04:04.000 --> 04:09.000]  Oh, it has been a heck of a week since the last show.
[04:09.000 --> 04:12.000]  Two weeks, actually. I was off last week. I apologize.
[04:12.000 --> 04:16.000]  I had a really bad sinus infection and needed to get over that.
[04:16.000 --> 04:21.000]  I could barely talk without my head ringin' and thuddin' every time I did.
[04:21.000 --> 04:25.000]  But I am here tonight. We are live. This is not a recording.
[04:25.000 --> 04:28.000]  Okay. For the last two weeks in class,
[04:28.000 --> 04:33.000]  we've been dealing with the constitutional challenge motions I wrote a long time ago,
[04:33.000 --> 04:37.000]  dealing with city attorneys as prosecutors
[04:37.000 --> 04:45.000]  and dealing with the criminal complaint being used as the prosecuting instrument,
[04:45.000 --> 04:47.000]  lack of an examining trial,
[04:47.000 --> 04:54.000]  and the fact that municipal courts are unconstitutional in the state of Texas
[04:54.000 --> 04:58.000]  as far as courts of non-record go.
[04:58.000 --> 05:03.000]  And the reason for that is is because the legislature delegated their power
[05:03.000 --> 05:08.000]  to create courts to the municipalities to create them by ordinance,
[05:08.000 --> 05:10.000]  which they cannot do.
[05:10.000 --> 05:16.000]  So I have been going through those documents trying to re-outfit them
[05:16.000 --> 05:20.000]  and rewrite them to not only cut down on their size
[05:20.000 --> 05:23.000]  but to make them more clear without so much repetition
[05:23.000 --> 05:25.000]  because I do have a lot of repetition in there
[05:25.000 --> 05:29.000]  because I would start the thought for each section off in the same place,
[05:29.000 --> 05:31.000]  and I really need to find a different way of doing that.
[05:31.000 --> 05:33.000]  I know this and I'm working on it.
[05:33.000 --> 05:39.000]  But that's where I have been buried for the last two weeks, day in and day out.
[05:39.000 --> 05:44.000]  Even when I was sick, this was all I could sit here and do besides walk my dogs.
[05:44.000 --> 05:46.000]  I had to walk them whether I wanted to or not.
[05:46.000 --> 05:49.000]  And I did not feel like staring at this computer screen,
[05:49.000 --> 05:55.000]  but I also did not want to just lay down and waste a day just so my head didn't hurt so bad.
[05:55.000 --> 06:00.000]  So that said, I am still working on the new seminar material, folks.
[06:00.000 --> 06:01.000]  Don't give up on it.
[06:01.000 --> 06:06.000]  Like I said, it's going to be much more detailed, much more focused,
[06:06.000 --> 06:13.000]  much more comprehensive than the original was.
[06:13.000 --> 06:17.000]  There's not going to be a lot of wiggle room in this new version
[06:17.000 --> 06:22.000]  for the powers that be to turn a blind eye to what they're doing and how they're doing it.
[06:22.000 --> 06:29.000]  All you've got to do is get your hands on it, learn it, know it, and then go after them with it,
[06:29.000 --> 06:34.000]  not the courts, not the cops, but your representatives.
[06:34.000 --> 06:38.000]  See, we're fighting these battles on the wrong fronts.
[06:38.000 --> 06:43.000]  We should not be trying simply to beat the cops in court.
[06:43.000 --> 06:50.000]  We should not be counting on the courts to do what the law requires because they won't.
[06:50.000 --> 06:55.000]  They think they are the only ones that know how to interpret the law,
[06:55.000 --> 07:00.000]  even when that interpretation flies right in the face of the law itself.
[07:00.000 --> 07:04.000]  Let me give you a couple of examples dealing with the city attorney.
[07:04.000 --> 07:09.000]  There are two primary cases that are cited in Texas when it comes to the challenge of a city attorney
[07:09.000 --> 07:13.000]  prosecuting in the name of the state and municipal courts,
[07:13.000 --> 07:20.000]  and that is NAF, the case of NAF v. State, and the case of Martin v. State.
[07:20.000 --> 07:29.000]  NAF, N-A-F-F, was in 1997, and Martin, I don't remember if he was in 2000.
[07:29.000 --> 07:35.000]  Martin actually makes reference to NAF in this section.
[07:35.000 --> 07:45.000]  So let me read you from NAF what the court stated when this gentleman raised this error.
[07:45.000 --> 07:50.000]  In his second point of error, NAF argues that he was denied due process
[07:50.000 --> 07:56.000]  because a city attorney or his deputy represented the state in his prosecution of his complaints.
[07:56.000 --> 08:00.000]  He argues that under Article 5, Section 21 of the Texas Constitution,
[08:00.000 --> 08:04.000]  only the county or district attorney may represent the state.
[08:04.000 --> 08:07.000]  Article 5, Section 21 of the Texas Constitution provides,
[08:07.000 --> 08:11.000]  a county attorney for counties in which there is not a resident criminal district attorney
[08:11.000 --> 08:15.000]  shall be elected by the qualified voters of each county,
[08:15.000 --> 08:19.000]  who shall be commissioned by the governor and hold his office for the term of four years.
[08:19.000 --> 08:22.000]  In the case of vacancy, the commissioner's court of the county
[08:22.000 --> 08:26.000]  shall have the power to appoint a county attorney until the next general election.
[08:26.000 --> 08:29.000]  The county attorney shall represent the state in all cases in the district
[08:29.000 --> 08:32.000]  and inferior courts in their respective counties.
[08:32.000 --> 08:36.000]  But if any county shall be included in a district in which there shall be a district attorney,
[08:36.000 --> 08:39.000]  the respective duties of district attorneys and county attorneys
[08:39.000 --> 08:43.000]  shall in such counties be regulated by the legislature.
[08:43.000 --> 08:47.000]  The legislature may provide for the election of district attorneys in such districts
[08:47.000 --> 08:50.000]  as may be deemed necessary and make provision for the compensation
[08:50.000 --> 08:52.000]  of district attorneys and county attorneys.
[08:52.000 --> 08:55.000]  District attorneys shall hold the office for a term of four years
[08:55.000 --> 08:57.000]  and until district assessors have qualified.
[08:57.000 --> 09:01.000]  Now that is Texas Constitution, Article 5, Section 21.
[09:01.000 --> 09:06.000]  This is Section 44.001 of the Texas Government Code.
[09:06.000 --> 09:11.000]  And it provides that the citizens of Wichita County elect a criminal district attorney.
[09:11.000 --> 09:17.000]  See, Texas Government Code annotated, Section 44.001, Vernon Supplemental, 1997.
[09:17.000 --> 09:22.000]  Accordingly, there is no constitutional county attorney in Wichita County.
[09:22.000 --> 09:26.000]  Thus, the plain language of the constitutional provision,
[09:26.000 --> 09:30.000]  the duties of the district attorney shall be regulated by the legislature.
[09:30.000 --> 09:33.000]  See, Texas Constitution, Article 5, Section 21.
[09:33.000 --> 09:37.000]  In the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the legislature has provided,
[09:37.000 --> 09:41.000]  all prosecutions in the municipal court shall be conducted by the city attorney
[09:41.000 --> 09:43.000]  of such city, town, or village or by his deputy.
[09:43.000 --> 09:48.000]  The county attorney of said county, of the county in which said city, town, or village is situated
[09:48.000 --> 09:53.000]  may, if he so desires, also represent the state in such prosecutions.
[09:53.000 --> 09:57.000]  The county attorney shall have no power to dismiss any prosecution pending in said court
[09:57.000 --> 10:00.000]  unless for reasons filed and approved by the judge.
[10:00.000 --> 10:04.000]  With the consent of the county attorney, appeals from municipal court to a county court,
[10:04.000 --> 10:09.000]  county court at law or any appellate court may be prosecuted by the city attorney or his deputy.
[10:09.000 --> 10:15.000]  They then go on to cite Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and annotate Article 45.03,
[10:15.000 --> 10:19.000]  which is now 45.201 FYI.
[10:19.000 --> 10:26.000]  And the case cited there for that was Thornton v. State, which is a 1989 case.
[10:26.000 --> 10:31.000]  And then they go, we hold that when a city attorney or his deputy represents the state
[10:31.000 --> 10:36.000]  in a municipal court proceeding, it does not violate Article 5, Section 21 of the Texas Constitution
[10:36.000 --> 10:41.000]  and thus does not violate the defendant's due process rights accordingly.
[10:41.000 --> 10:44.000]  We overruled and asked second point of error.
[10:44.000 --> 10:48.000]  Now, what is the problem with this writing and this opinion?
[10:48.000 --> 10:55.000]  And by the way, both of these cases were from court of appeals in Texas, Fort Worth,
[10:55.000 --> 11:01.000]  and the other one here I think was Dallas County, court of appeals of Texas, Dallas.
[11:01.000 --> 11:03.000]  So these are appellate courts.
[11:03.000 --> 11:06.000]  They are not the court of criminal appeals.
[11:06.000 --> 11:09.000]  But there's a problem.
[11:09.000 --> 11:17.000]  The court's reasoning is that because the legislature wrote a statute naming the city attorney as the prosecutor
[11:17.000 --> 11:24.000]  and because there's not a county attorney in that particular county because there's a criminal district attorney
[11:24.000 --> 11:29.000]  that's been elected, that that does not violate the Constitution.
[11:29.000 --> 11:38.000]  But that is a very poor interpretation of allowing a statute to override a constitutional provision.
[11:38.000 --> 11:48.000]  The statute cannot transfer a constitutionally assigned and delegated power from the public officer
[11:48.000 --> 11:52.000]  and office in which it was vested to someone else.
[11:52.000 --> 11:55.000]  And the court does not have the power to do that.
[11:55.000 --> 12:00.000]  Not in any way whatsoever.
[12:00.000 --> 12:07.000]  And even the code of criminal procedure tells you that where there is a criminal district attorney,
[12:07.000 --> 12:16.000]  they are to assume the duties of the county attorney that doesn't exist anymore because there is a criminal district attorney.
[12:16.000 --> 12:23.000]  Now, a criminal district attorney and a district attorney are not the same thing under Texas law.
[12:23.000 --> 12:27.000]  Okay? They're not the same thing.
[12:27.000 --> 12:37.000]  So the exclusivity of a criminal district attorney is not an exclusive for a district attorney.
[12:37.000 --> 12:47.000]  There are district and county attorneys in the same counties and they divide up the cases based upon felonies versus misdemeanors.
[12:47.000 --> 12:53.000]  The DAs prosecute the felonies and the county attorneys prosecute the misdemeanors.
[12:53.000 --> 12:54.000]  Okay?
[12:54.000 --> 13:05.000]  But in the criminal district attorney counties, they are required to prosecute everything since there is no county attorney.
[13:05.000 --> 13:16.000]  The city attorney is not an agent or an employee or a subdivision of the district attorney's office.
[13:16.000 --> 13:20.000]  They are not and cannot be so.
[13:20.000 --> 13:28.000]  So the court's reasoning in these two cases is absolute BS from the word go.
[13:28.000 --> 13:41.000]  They tried to use a legislative enactment to really redefine what the Constitution says and that doesn't work.
[13:41.000 --> 13:50.000]  Okay? The statute is unconstitutional on its face because it does that which the Constitution itself does not allow,
[13:50.000 --> 14:01.000]  which is re-delegate a power belonging to an elected public official, the county or district attorney or the criminal district attorney,
[14:01.000 --> 14:18.000]  and gives it to a private corporate attorney or to a hired gun private attorney acting as legal counsel for the municipality in question, all of which they cannot do.
[14:18.000 --> 14:30.000]  Now, the problem here is, is there doesn't appear to be, unless Thornton is, which let me look here and see.
[14:30.000 --> 14:42.000]  No. Texas or Thornton v. State also appears to be an appellate court decision, not a court of criminal appeals decision.
[14:42.000 --> 14:47.000]  So there, too, lies a problem with what they're doing.
[14:47.000 --> 14:57.000]  So, ladies and gentlemen, the problem that we have with how they're doing things is it's criminal. It's corrupt.
[14:57.000 --> 15:11.000]  They are trying to administratively rewrite the Texas Constitution to do something they are forbidden to do, and we are not holding them accountable for doing it.
[15:11.000 --> 15:25.000]  Okay? That's a problem. It's a real problem. And because it's a real problem, what can I say?
[15:25.000 --> 15:32.000]  I don't know how to put this to make it sound like we should be accepting of what they're doing because we most certainly shouldn't.
[15:32.000 --> 15:39.000]  They want us to respect the judiciary as doing the right thing all the time when we, in fact, know better.
[15:39.000 --> 15:45.000]  They do not do the right thing all the time. They do the right thing hardly ever.
[15:45.000 --> 15:56.000]  If it takes away government power or increases the people's power, it will not be allowed to occur if they can find a way to prevent it.
[15:56.000 --> 16:02.000]  They have demonstrated that time and time again. Okay?
[16:02.000 --> 16:14.000]  And because they've demonstrated that time and time again, they're not trustworthy. They're not reliable. Okay? At all.
[16:14.000 --> 16:23.000]  Yeah, this is a court of – Thornton v. State is a court of appeals of Texas, Eastland. So again, it's a court of appeals case.
[16:23.000 --> 16:32.000]  Apparently, the Court of Criminal Appeals, the Criminal Supreme Court, has never taken the opportunity to fix this problem.
[16:32.000 --> 16:38.000]  Well, Randy and I are working on fixing this problem, and we're going to have to sue somebody to do it, I'm sure.
[16:38.000 --> 16:47.000]  But in any case, we're about to take a break, so y'all hold on. I'm going to turn on the phones. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:47.000 --> 17:00.000]  If you want to call and get in line and talk, let's do that. Give us a call. We'll be right back after this break.
[17:00.000 --> 17:06.000]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word?
[17:06.000 --> 17:12.000]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk,
[17:12.000 --> 17:17.000]  where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[17:17.000 --> 17:24.000]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth.
[17:24.000 --> 17:32.000]  Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[17:32.000 --> 17:39.000]  Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[17:39.000 --> 17:44.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[17:44.000 --> 17:50.000]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[17:50.000 --> 18:00.000]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:27.000 --> 18:34.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:50.000]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 19:01.000]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com, or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:11.000 --> 19:20.000]  Yeah, the storm looms, the sun reams in my head, grabs up the silent star, took it to dance,
[19:20.000 --> 19:41.000]  can I be cold if I hold out and spin into the present? Have my feelings to the twilight zone, let it come and help me if I keep on, my feet come and move on the moon and star.
[19:41.000 --> 19:50.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[19:50.000 --> 20:00.000]  All right, now to top that off, the Thornton case, which is Thornton v. State, 778 SW 2nd 149.
[20:00.000 --> 20:10.000]  The Thornton case literally says it quotes a portion of Texas law that is still there.
[20:10.000 --> 20:14.000]  Okay, it's just in a, I think it's in a different section.
[20:14.000 --> 20:21.000]  Let's see, 44.001 is what was originally quoted in Thornton.
[20:21.000 --> 20:40.000]  And 44.101 or any of the rest of them, in every single county where they have, they've elected a criminal district attorney,
[20:40.000 --> 20:53.000]  that section of the government code has a section that says, the criminal district attorney shall represent the state in all matters in the district and inferior courts in the county.
[20:53.000 --> 21:02.000]  The criminal district attorney shall perform the other duties that are conferred by general law on district and county attorneys.
[21:02.000 --> 21:18.000]  Okay, so where did these idiots in Thornton get to the point where, after reading that, they can sit here and say,
[21:18.000 --> 21:32.000]  we hold that when a city attorney or his deputy, or I'm sorry, wrong case. Where'd Thornton go? Thornton.
[21:32.000 --> 21:38.000]  The criminal district attorney of Taylor County shall perform those duties, which is what the case was about in that particular county.
[21:38.000 --> 21:48.000]  It argues that the emphasized language in Article 45.03, which is currently 45.202 or 201 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that says city attorneys can prosecute,
[21:48.000 --> 21:58.000]  violates that part of Texas Constitution Article 5, Section 21, which states that the county attorney shall represent the state in all cases in the district and inferior courts in their respective counties.
[21:58.000 --> 22:11.000]  Taylor County has a criminal district attorney. Therefore, there is no constitutional county attorney in Taylor County, and that cites Neil V. Sheppard, a 1948 case.
[22:11.000 --> 22:19.000]  The language urged by appellate is not applicable. Based on what?
[22:19.000 --> 22:30.000]  They are not telling you why the language is not applicable because the language of the statute conflicts with the language of the Constitution.
[22:30.000 --> 22:41.000]  It also conflicts with the other provision of the government code saying that the criminal district attorney shall perform all the duties of the county attorney in addition to their own,
[22:41.000 --> 22:50.000]  the same as the district attorney would have to do. So what is not applicable here?
[22:50.000 --> 23:02.000]  See, the problem is, is we are letting idiots control our courts, okay? And there is no question they're idiots.
[23:02.000 --> 23:19.000]  Because if they weren't idiots, they couldn't keep doing this with a straight face. And they couldn't keep getting just a smack on the back of the hand, very lightly, I might add,
[23:19.000 --> 23:33.000]  like someone in grade school when they screw up this bad. They're either getting approval of other idiots or this is all by design.
[23:33.000 --> 23:52.000]  But in every single one of these cases, they are arguing that the statute written by the legislature empowering a city attorney somehow trumps the Constitution itself.
[23:52.000 --> 23:58.000]  Every single one of these cases does exactly that.
[23:58.000 --> 24:11.000]  They are wrong on that point alone. The opinion is invalid on that point alone. But they do oh so much more.
[24:11.000 --> 24:20.000]  Each and every one of these opinions has multiple rulings that violate the Texas Constitution, multiple rulings.
[24:20.000 --> 24:33.000]  Not only that, if they don't violate the state Constitution, they are directly in violation of state law and the rules of procedure.
[24:33.000 --> 24:40.000]  Very simple. You would think they would figure this out. But no, they didn't figure it out.
[24:40.000 --> 24:51.000]  And they didn't figure it out because they don't want to figure it out. Figuring it out entails a responsibility and a liability they don't want to accept having to have.
[24:51.000 --> 24:59.000]  That is doing it right and suffering the consequences if they fail to do it right. Okay?
[24:59.000 --> 25:11.000]  So the question now becomes what do we do about it? It's obvious the courts cannot be relied on. They are peopled by status morons.
[25:11.000 --> 25:21.000]  You cannot read these cases and not conclude the ruling is out of the brain of a moron.
[25:21.000 --> 25:29.000]  There is no way to avoid that conclusion. And the courts wonder why we don't trust them.
[25:29.000 --> 25:36.000]  Well, let's see. How many examples would you like me to give you?
[25:36.000 --> 25:44.000]  Because they are all right here in front of me and I put them right here in front of you.
[25:44.000 --> 25:51.000]  So what's wrong with this picture? Well, same thing is wrong with it. It's always been wrong with it.
[25:51.000 --> 25:58.000]  We gave status morons a monopoly on the ability to practice law and sit as judges.
[25:58.000 --> 26:15.000]  Now, actually, we didn't give them that power. They usurped that power unto themselves without our approval by creating an act that makes them the exclusive authority on the practice of law.
[26:15.000 --> 26:25.000]  Which was also a very, very big mistake because they have ever since that day used the law to oppress the people of this state.
[26:25.000 --> 26:32.000]  They've used that law to oppress the people of every state. And that is the State Bar Act.
[26:32.000 --> 26:44.000]  Okay? The State Bar Act in Texas is just as unconstitutional as it can possibly be, just like these opinions.
[26:44.000 --> 26:57.000]  But the general public either doesn't know or doesn't want to know how far down the rabbit hole they've allowed themselves to be drug.
[26:57.000 --> 27:07.000]  And now they're floundering around in the dark and they don't want to look stupid even though it's pitch black where they're at and they can't look anything.
[27:07.000 --> 27:17.000]  They don't want to admit they've been had. They don't want to admit they were this gullible for this long.
[27:17.000 --> 27:25.000]  And the very few of us that know they have been and that we were up until a certain point where we looked around and said,
[27:25.000 --> 27:42.000]  this stinks. Well, I need to figure out why. And we went looking, which is where my days and hours for the last damn near two decades has been, is focused on rooting out this stuff in every place I can find it.
[27:42.000 --> 27:49.000]  Folks, you all think all I do is traffic. That is not the case. Okay? I do a lot more than that.
[27:49.000 --> 27:57.000]  But like I say, this is the area where more people can wrap their minds around it.
[27:57.000 --> 28:05.000]  Think about this. If you were in a murder case with this many mistakes and this much judicial misconduct and this much subversion of the Constitution,
[28:05.000 --> 28:22.000]  it would boggle your mind to such a point you would never ever be willing to accept that the state would be willing to be that dirty, that much, to get that conviction.
[28:22.000 --> 28:34.000]  Okay? You wouldn't. You wouldn't be willing to accept that. But when it comes to money, you can see how they would benefit from doing that because you don't think there's any money in convicting someone for murder.
[28:34.000 --> 28:48.000]  And you're right up to a point. The really truly criminal cases are not revenue generators for the state and local political subdivisions.
[28:48.000 --> 28:54.000]  They're not the revenue generators. This kind of crap is the revenue generators.
[28:54.000 --> 29:05.000]  This petty, anti BS that involves fines and fees of exorbitant numbers, and I don't mean just in amounts.
[29:05.000 --> 29:19.000]  I mean in the number of people they can stick it to using it, which makes those little amounts they seem to be charging astronomically huge in the overall budget.
[29:19.000 --> 29:30.000]  Okay? I mean you multiply 200 by, I don't know, eight or nine million people and what do you get?
[29:30.000 --> 29:46.000]  Okay? You get the idea here? And that's not a month. That's not a year. That's probably every week.
[29:46.000 --> 29:52.000]  Okay? Across the entire state of Texas, eight or nine million people ranked over the coals for this BS.
[29:52.000 --> 30:02.000]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984. Give us a call. Let's talk.
[30:02.000 --> 30:08.000]  Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under the blood alcohol limit.
[30:08.000 --> 30:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalyzers and a government cover-up in a moment.
[30:15.000 --> 30:20.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.000 --> 30:25.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.000 --> 30:30.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.000 --> 30:33.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.000 --> 30:40.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:40.000 --> 30:44.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.000 --> 30:50.000]  Ever hear the term fine farming? It's when cops fine innocent people to bring in revenue,
[30:50.000 --> 30:53.000]  and it's apparently big business in the Sunshine State of Florida.
[30:53.000 --> 30:59.000]  This case involves breathalyzers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations.
[30:59.000 --> 31:04.000]  Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated.
[31:04.000 --> 31:08.000]  State officials knew about it for two and a half years, but did nothing.
[31:08.000 --> 31:14.000]  In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document the problem.
[31:14.000 --> 31:19.000]  A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life, but now that the cover-up has been exposed,
[31:19.000 --> 31:22.000]  perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier.
[31:22.000 --> 31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.000 --> 31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:36.000 --> 31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:38.000 --> 31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.000 --> 31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives,
[31:46.000 --> 31:49.000]  and thousands of my fellow force responders are dying.
[31:49.000 --> 31:51.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.000 --> 31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.000 --> 31:58.000]  I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:58.000 --> 32:02.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:02.000 --> 32:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:06.000 --> 32:08.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[32:08.000 --> 32:10.000]  and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:16.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:16.000 --> 32:18.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly,
[32:18.000 --> 32:20.000]  the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:24.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce
[32:24.000 --> 32:26.000]  and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy A. Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.000 --> 32:32.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:32.000 --> 32:34.000]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:38.000 --> 32:41.000]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:43.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:43.000 --> 32:46.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.000 --> 32:48.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:48.000 --> 32:51.000]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 32:59.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:26.000 --> 33:30.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[33:30.000 --> 33:34.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Monday night show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[33:34.000 --> 33:37.000]  It is August 15th, 2022.
[33:37.000 --> 33:39.000]  Like I said, we are live tonight.
[33:39.000 --> 33:41.000]  We are not a recording.
[33:41.000 --> 33:48.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984 if you want to call in, talk about an issue or ask a question.
[33:48.000 --> 33:52.000]  Right now we have Chris in Colorado up on the board,
[33:52.000 --> 33:54.000]  so I'm going to go ahead and take Chris's call.
[33:54.000 --> 33:56.000]  Chris, what can we do for you?
[33:56.000 --> 33:58.000]  Hey, Eddie, I was just going to listen tonight,
[33:58.000 --> 34:02.000]  but you were talking about the criminal system, the criminal justice system,
[34:02.000 --> 34:07.000]  and I'd like to hear your thoughts on what you're doing in your state,
[34:07.000 --> 34:11.000]  because it looks like I got to do it here in Colorado.
[34:11.000 --> 34:13.000]  Well, I don't know what you mean by hear my thoughts.
[34:13.000 --> 34:20.000]  My thoughts are constantly in turmoil about whether to fight them the way they want to be fought,
[34:20.000 --> 34:23.000]  where they can control the outcome or just grab them in the middle of the night
[34:23.000 --> 34:26.000]  and go from a tree.
[34:26.000 --> 34:30.000]  Well, we're getting close to both, I guess.
[34:30.000 --> 34:33.000]  So I'll share the story. I'll try to make it quick.
[34:33.000 --> 34:38.000]  About a month ago, I returned to my Storrsbocker from traveling state to state
[34:38.000 --> 34:43.000]  and found that I had been cleaned out about two-thirds of my stuff.
[34:43.000 --> 34:48.000]  They took about $35,000, $40,000 worth of stuff.
[34:48.000 --> 34:50.000]  They who?
[34:50.000 --> 34:52.000]  At least the thieves.
[34:52.000 --> 34:55.000]  So when you started talking about this, the way you said it,
[34:55.000 --> 34:58.000]  I was assuming for some reason the state raided your Storrsbocker, but go ahead.
[34:58.000 --> 35:01.000]  No, no, no. Well, this is – it'll get to the state here in a minute.
[35:01.000 --> 35:08.000]  So this Storrsbocker had been broken into – I had it broken in once before.
[35:08.000 --> 35:11.000]  They didn't take anything that time. They just broke the lock.
[35:11.000 --> 35:14.000]  They were coming back, I guess, and so they moved me to another unit,
[35:14.000 --> 35:18.000]  and a month later or three months later – sorry, they broke into that one.
[35:18.000 --> 35:21.000]  So this place was getting broken into all the time, blah, blah, blah.
[35:21.000 --> 35:23.000]  That's one part of the story.
[35:23.000 --> 35:29.000]  So I called the police, and obviously they did a – the sheriff had jurisdiction there.
[35:29.000 --> 35:34.000]  The sheriff came out, the deputy came out, did a report, took pictures. That was it.
[35:34.000 --> 35:37.000]  And I asked them, I said, what can we do about this?
[35:37.000 --> 35:39.000]  I said, and this is ridiculous. There was also a witness,
[35:39.000 --> 35:41.000]  so I knew they were coming by early in the morning.
[35:41.000 --> 35:43.000]  I did a stakeout the next morning.
[35:43.000 --> 35:48.000]  Sure enough, these guys came through, no license plate on a car,
[35:48.000 --> 35:52.000]  and they didn't know who I was, but I followed them after they decided not to go in this time
[35:52.000 --> 35:55.000]  because people were in the parking lot.
[35:55.000 --> 35:59.000]  I followed them. They got wind of me following them after a while,
[35:59.000 --> 36:03.000]  and then they started weaving in and out of parking lots and hiding.
[36:03.000 --> 36:07.000]  I called 911. I was in communication trying to get this organized,
[36:07.000 --> 36:13.000]  trying to stay and keep an eye on them, and then had them pinned in the hotel parking lot.
[36:13.000 --> 36:21.000]  The cruisers show up from a police district, and by that time we were in the city, and they let them go.
[36:21.000 --> 36:28.000]  They said we can't pursue them because they might accelerate and cause harm down the road.
[36:28.000 --> 36:33.000]  I'm like, I'm chasing at 40 miles an hour. That's not acceleration out of control, you know.
[36:33.000 --> 36:35.000]  That's what their argument was.
[36:35.000 --> 36:37.000]  So they let them go. They had the crooks there.
[36:37.000 --> 36:42.000]  All right. A week later, I find the guys selling – I find my stuff being sold online.
[36:42.000 --> 36:45.000]  So now we have a detective. It's a Sunday.
[36:45.000 --> 36:48.000]  They can't do anything on a Sunday because the detectives aren't showing up until Tuesday,
[36:48.000 --> 36:50.000]  and they weren't going to do anything until Tuesday.
[36:50.000 --> 36:54.000]  Another detective gets on it Monday. He sets up a sting by for Tuesday morning.
[36:54.000 --> 36:58.000]  Both the guys are there. He arrests both the guys.
[36:58.000 --> 37:04.000]  But before that, he says, I just might not end up in an arrest because, I've got to be honest with you,
[37:04.000 --> 37:08.000]  I have 72 hours once I arrest somebody, and the paperwork is so much
[37:08.000 --> 37:13.000]  that I may not be able to get it done for them to be legitimately incarcerated, I guess.
[37:13.000 --> 37:16.000]  And my mouth just dropped at that point.
[37:16.000 --> 37:20.000]  And that's when I started learning about how the system right now is going across the country,
[37:20.000 --> 37:22.000]  but specifically in Colorado.
[37:22.000 --> 37:24.000]  All right. So they arrest them. They get going.
[37:24.000 --> 37:27.000]  One of the guys had multiple warrants, so he wasn't – he's not even on his case yet.
[37:27.000 --> 37:30.000]  They're still doing other stuff, and he's still in jail.
[37:30.000 --> 37:32.000]  I didn't find out until a week later.
[37:32.000 --> 37:36.000]  They let this Becken guy go two days later on a $10,000 bond.
[37:36.000 --> 37:40.000]  And the detectives recommended a $25,000 bond
[37:40.000 --> 37:45.000]  because they've stolen probably in excess of $100,000 in other people's property, too.
[37:45.000 --> 37:49.000]  But the system let them go for a $10,000 bond.
[37:49.000 --> 37:55.000]  Well, the system sets the bond according to the level of the offense and sometimes prior convictions.
[37:55.000 --> 38:01.000]  If this person, even though they're stealing a lot of valuable stuff,
[38:01.000 --> 38:07.000]  if they've never been convicted of it, there's no record for the judge to base the bond on.
[38:07.000 --> 38:10.000]  So all the judge can do is they'll go by prior convictions.
[38:10.000 --> 38:18.000]  They'll go by the alleged level of the offense that can be proven, not estimated, but proven.
[38:18.000 --> 38:23.000]  So if they can only prove so far that this idiot stole $10,000 worth of stuff
[38:23.000 --> 38:26.000]  instead of a couple of hundred thousand dollars worth of stuff,
[38:26.000 --> 38:31.000]  then they're bonding him on a misdemeanor rather than a felony.
[38:31.000 --> 38:33.000]  You see what I'm saying?
[38:33.000 --> 38:34.000]  Yeah.
[38:34.000 --> 38:39.000]  Because in most states, the level of the charge for theft
[38:39.000 --> 38:45.000]  is based upon the monetary value of the property that they can prove was stolen.
[38:45.000 --> 38:50.000]  Well, they proved the day of the arrest they stole over $10,000 from me
[38:50.000 --> 38:54.000]  because that's what they were trying to sell online.
[38:54.000 --> 38:58.000]  And then everybody else's stuff. So they proved that.
[38:58.000 --> 39:03.000]  Okay. So what is $10,000 worth of stolen property
[39:03.000 --> 39:08.000]  as far as what level of charge does that constitute in Colorado?
[39:08.000 --> 39:10.000]  These are all felonies, apart from what I know.
[39:10.000 --> 39:13.000]  Now, I'm still trying to dig into it, but the one deputy who showed up,
[39:13.000 --> 39:16.000]  he said, this is enough for me to put a felony report in.
[39:16.000 --> 39:19.000]  They got a felony break-in and the amount that's being stolen,
[39:19.000 --> 39:23.000]  I'm seeing leave in the facility, they're in a felony, whatever.
[39:23.000 --> 39:30.000]  And then on that Sunday, they were selling $10,000 worth of stuff of mine,
[39:30.000 --> 39:34.000]  at least, for just under $5,000.
[39:34.000 --> 39:36.000]  And they had multiple other things on there.
[39:36.000 --> 39:38.000]  So they had verified proof of my own stuff.
[39:38.000 --> 39:41.000]  And then they got an affidavit for me on how much do you think is out there.
[39:41.000 --> 39:44.000]  I said, I don't know yet. It's taking me a month to count everything.
[39:44.000 --> 39:48.000]  But I'd say easily $30,000 plus.
[39:48.000 --> 39:50.000]  And they said, okay, we're going to need you to get proof of that
[39:50.000 --> 39:52.000]  so we can get that to whatever.
[39:52.000 --> 39:55.000]  But in the meantime, they let this guy go into $10,000.
[39:55.000 --> 39:57.000]  So that's just what I know.
[39:57.000 --> 40:00.000]  But when I talked to the detectives about this, that's when they said,
[40:00.000 --> 40:03.000]  that's when they started to open up and share about how frustrated they are
[40:03.000 --> 40:06.000]  that the system does this a lot, lets them down.
[40:06.000 --> 40:09.000]  They said, we did all this work. We presented it.
[40:09.000 --> 40:12.000]  And yeah, they let them go into a $10,000 bond.
[40:12.000 --> 40:15.000]  I said, why are they doing this? They said, welcome to what they're doing.
[40:15.000 --> 40:18.000]  We can't chase them. We can't call them names.
[40:18.000 --> 40:21.000]  We can't do all this kind of stuff because during COVID,
[40:21.000 --> 40:24.000]  they decriminalized so much of the, you know,
[40:24.000 --> 40:28.000]  they've dropped charges down to a level that they just,
[40:28.000 --> 40:30.000]  they come in and they go out.
[40:30.000 --> 40:33.000]  They come in and they go out. They go back and do it again.
[40:33.000 --> 40:36.000]  And we've had, so I've had hour-long conversations with these detectives,
[40:36.000 --> 40:38.000]  just heart to heart about what's going on.
[40:38.000 --> 40:41.000]  And then I hear about what, you know,
[40:41.000 --> 40:45.000]  I went to court just to see this guy get charged,
[40:45.000 --> 40:47.000]  and they gave me a wrong date, so I didn't get to see him.
[40:47.000 --> 40:51.000]  But I watched other people and kind of watched how this process was going on.
[40:51.000 --> 40:53.000]  And so I'm starting to learn it.
[40:53.000 --> 40:56.000]  But from what I'm hearing from the sheriff's office
[40:56.000 --> 40:59.000]  and from all the people who are entry level, you know, not entry level,
[40:59.000 --> 41:02.000]  but the deputies and the detectives,
[41:02.000 --> 41:04.000]  the people I'm dealing with on a regular basis,
[41:04.000 --> 41:06.000]  they're just like, yeah, we're so frustrated because we do,
[41:06.000 --> 41:09.000]  we have to do all this work under strict deadlines.
[41:09.000 --> 41:12.000]  And they tend to just let them go.
[41:12.000 --> 41:16.000]  And, you know, we, and again, they wouldn't have done any of this
[41:16.000 --> 41:18.000]  if I hadn't have found them.
[41:18.000 --> 41:21.000]  Because they're so, you know, they're basically telling me that, you know,
[41:21.000 --> 41:24.000]  we can't, we got 150 case silos all the time.
[41:24.000 --> 41:25.000]  We don't know what to do.
[41:25.000 --> 41:28.000]  And so it's hard for us to keep, we don't have the resources.
[41:28.000 --> 41:29.000]  A lot of people are quitting.
[41:29.000 --> 41:33.000]  A lot of people don't want to be in the law,
[41:33.000 --> 41:37.000]  be in officers anymore because their hands are so tied.
[41:37.000 --> 41:39.000]  And he says, you just witnessed what happened.
[41:39.000 --> 41:44.000]  They let them go because they do criminalized property theft.
[41:44.000 --> 41:47.000]  They don't consider that legitimate crime anymore.
[41:47.000 --> 41:48.000]  Yeah.
[41:48.000 --> 41:53.000]  Well, that's the problem with having Democrat governors and mayors
[41:53.000 --> 41:57.000]  and all this other stuff that's just letting the crooks run wild.
[41:57.000 --> 41:58.000]  There are hopes.
[41:58.000 --> 41:59.000]  Yeah.
[41:59.000 --> 42:01.000]  There's an agenda behind doing this.
[42:01.000 --> 42:02.000]  Okay?
[42:02.000 --> 42:03.000]  Okay.
[42:03.000 --> 42:06.000]  Now, not only the governors,
[42:06.000 --> 42:09.000]  but you've got a lot of prosecutors in these states now
[42:09.000 --> 42:11.000]  that are doing the exact same thing.
[42:11.000 --> 42:12.000]  Okay.
[42:12.000 --> 42:17.000]  That's what DeSantis just recalled that one in Florida
[42:17.000 --> 42:20.000]  that was not prosecuting the state attorney there
[42:20.000 --> 42:24.000]  that was not prosecuting any of the stuff he was supposed to be prosecuting
[42:24.000 --> 42:26.000]  as if state law didn't matter.
[42:26.000 --> 42:32.000]  See, the problem is that when a district or county attorney refuses to prosecute the law
[42:32.000 --> 42:36.000]  within their state, they're committing a crime.
[42:36.000 --> 42:39.000]  They took an oath to do that.
[42:39.000 --> 42:43.000]  That crime is obstruction of justice.
[42:43.000 --> 42:44.000]  Okay?
[42:44.000 --> 42:52.000]  When they do not do their job to prosecute those legitimately caught for criminal conduct,
[42:52.000 --> 42:55.000]  they're letting them go instead.
[42:55.000 --> 42:59.000]  That is obstruction of justice.
[42:59.000 --> 43:00.000]  Okay.
[43:00.000 --> 43:01.000]  All right?
[43:01.000 --> 43:07.000]  So the first thing I would start doing is naming names and getting evidence
[43:07.000 --> 43:12.000]  against these district and county attorneys at the local level
[43:12.000 --> 43:15.000]  and state's attorneys, if necessary,
[43:15.000 --> 43:24.000]  and then send them to the FBI and send them to a different state's attorney.
[43:24.000 --> 43:35.000]  How do I find out what went on in the initial bond hearing?
[43:35.000 --> 43:38.000]  Well, the initial bond hearing is irrelevant.
[43:38.000 --> 43:41.000]  What you need to find out is why they're not getting prosecuted.
[43:41.000 --> 43:44.000]  That will be the prosecuting attorney almost always
[43:44.000 --> 43:47.000]  unless the judge is throwing it out on their own.
[43:47.000 --> 43:48.000]  Hang on just a second.
[43:48.000 --> 43:50.000]  Let me take this break, and I'll be right back, okay?
[43:50.000 --> 43:53.000]  512-646-1984, folks.
[43:53.000 --> 43:54.000]  Give us a call.
[43:54.000 --> 43:55.000]  Get in line.
[43:55.000 --> 44:00.000]  Let's talk.
[44:00.000 --> 44:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.000 --> 44:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[44:07.000 --> 44:10.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course
[44:10.000 --> 44:14.000]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:14.000 --> 44:18.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.000 --> 44:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.000 --> 44:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too.
[44:27.000 --> 44:30.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[44:30.000 --> 44:34.000]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:36.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[44:36.000 --> 44:38.000]  you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:38.000 --> 44:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:46.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[44:46.000 --> 44:52.000]  tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 44:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[44:56.000 --> 45:01.000]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:02.000]  I love Logos.
[45:02.000 --> 45:06.000]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[45:06.000 --> 45:08.000]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[45:08.000 --> 45:10.000]  I need my truth fixed.
[45:10.000 --> 45:11.000]  I'd be lost without Logos,
[45:11.000 --> 45:14.000]  and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[45:14.000 --> 45:17.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite,
[45:17.000 --> 45:21.000]  and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[45:21.000 --> 45:23.000]  How can I help Logos?
[45:23.000 --> 45:25.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[45:25.000 --> 45:28.000]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos
[45:28.000 --> 45:30.000]  with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[45:30.000 --> 45:32.000]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[45:32.000 --> 45:35.000]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[45:35.000 --> 45:38.000]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[45:38.000 --> 45:42.000]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link,
[45:42.000 --> 45:44.000]  and Logos gets a few pesos.
[45:44.000 --> 45:45.000]  Do I pay extra?
[45:45.000 --> 45:46.000]  No.
[45:46.000 --> 45:48.000]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[45:48.000 --> 45:49.000]  No.
[45:49.000 --> 45:50.000]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[45:50.000 --> 45:51.000]  No.
[45:51.000 --> 45:52.000]  I mean, yes.
[45:52.000 --> 45:55.000]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[45:55.000 --> 45:56.000]  This is perfect.
[45:56.000 --> 45:58.000]  Thank you so much.
[45:58.000 --> 45:59.000]  You're welcome.
[45:59.000 --> 46:01.000]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[46:17.000 --> 46:18.000]  All right, folks.
[46:18.000 --> 46:19.000]  We are back.
[46:19.000 --> 46:24.000]  This is rule of law radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[46:24.000 --> 46:27.000]  We are currently talking to Chris in Colorado.
[46:27.000 --> 46:31.000]  Now, on top of the obstruction of justice, you've also got a
[46:31.000 --> 46:35.000]  failure to provide equal protection of the law, okay?
[46:35.000 --> 46:38.000]  Those are two things the prosecutors are guilty of when
[46:38.000 --> 46:41.000]  they won't prosecute these cases where there's plenty of facts
[46:41.000 --> 46:45.000]  and evidence to support prosecuting these cases, okay?
[46:45.000 --> 46:48.000]  Not to mention aiding and abetting,
[46:48.000 --> 46:50.000]  because that's really what they're doing on top of
[46:50.000 --> 46:52.000]  everything else.
[46:52.000 --> 46:55.000]  Now, that said, if you want to find out what happened at the
[46:55.000 --> 46:57.000]  bond hearing, that's a matter of public record.
[46:57.000 --> 47:01.000]  Court proceedings in Colorado are 100% public just like they
[47:01.000 --> 47:02.000]  are here in Texas.
[47:02.000 --> 47:07.000]  All you got to do is go send an information request to the
[47:07.000 --> 47:09.000]  court that held the bond hearing,
[47:09.000 --> 47:12.000]  ask for a copy of the records and get them,
[47:12.000 --> 47:14.000]  or go down there in person and get them.
[47:14.000 --> 47:18.000]  But you'll probably need the name of the individual and the
[47:18.000 --> 47:21.000]  docket number or the case number or something like that,
[47:21.000 --> 47:24.000]  which you could probably get from the cops.
[47:24.000 --> 47:25.000]  I've got the case number.
[47:25.000 --> 47:27.000]  I've got the...
[47:27.000 --> 47:29.000]  So then all you got to do is contact the clerk of the court
[47:29.000 --> 47:32.000]  where the bond hearing was held and get a copy of the records,
[47:32.000 --> 47:34.000]  and you could find out.
[47:34.000 --> 47:37.000]  Because everything that happened as to why that bond was
[47:37.000 --> 47:39.000]  set, all the paperwork associated with it,
[47:39.000 --> 47:41.000]  everything else should be there.
[47:41.000 --> 47:45.000]  Now, there is a possibility the prosecuting attorney did not
[47:45.000 --> 47:48.000]  charge them with the maximum possible offense that they
[47:48.000 --> 47:53.000]  could have, which again would be a problem.
[47:53.000 --> 47:57.000]  But if they do that, then usually that's done because
[47:57.000 --> 47:59.000]  they're looking at providing a plea deal.
[47:59.000 --> 48:02.000]  You help me catch other people doing the same thing,
[48:02.000 --> 48:04.000]  and I won't prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law.
[48:04.000 --> 48:07.000]  I'll cut you a break and only prosecute you for the little
[48:07.000 --> 48:09.000]  stuff, that kind of thing.
[48:09.000 --> 48:12.000]  But if that didn't happen, then the question is,
[48:12.000 --> 48:19.000]  why were they on such a low bond for such a huge crime?
[48:19.000 --> 48:20.000]  That's what I didn't get to know.
[48:20.000 --> 48:21.000]  I didn't even know happened.
[48:21.000 --> 48:24.000]  So the first court date I thought I was going to,
[48:24.000 --> 48:26.000]  which was supposed to be the charges,
[48:26.000 --> 48:28.000]  was a couple weeks ago on a Monday,
[48:28.000 --> 48:29.000]  and they said be there at 9.
[48:29.000 --> 48:32.000]  Well, the victim is never asked to come to the bond hearing.
[48:32.000 --> 48:35.000]  That's got nothing to do with the prosecution of the
[48:35.000 --> 48:36.000]  actual offense.
[48:36.000 --> 48:39.000]  So the victim doesn't have to be there for that,
[48:39.000 --> 48:41.000]  and they're usually not even notified it's happening.
[48:41.000 --> 48:43.000]  But I can go, right?
[48:43.000 --> 48:46.000]  You could if you knew when and where it was going to be, yeah.
[48:46.000 --> 48:47.000]  It's a public proceeding.
[48:47.000 --> 48:49.000]  It has to be by law.
[48:49.000 --> 48:50.000]  Okay.
[48:50.000 --> 48:51.000]  Well, they're trying to get to every single one.
[48:51.000 --> 48:54.000]  I didn't know they were going to be bonded that quick.
[48:54.000 --> 48:56.000]  So I need to ask the question.
[48:56.000 --> 49:00.000]  The thing is, is a bond may not even be required to be done by
[49:00.000 --> 49:02.000]  a magistrate in some states.
[49:02.000 --> 49:08.000]  They could bond out directly from the jail by giving a bond to
[49:08.000 --> 49:12.000]  the sheriff's deputies, et cetera, et cetera.
[49:12.000 --> 49:14.000]  There may not even be a magistrate or a court hearing to
[49:14.000 --> 49:20.000]  set a bond depending upon what it is and what the offense is.
[49:20.000 --> 49:24.000]  Well, the sheriff recommended a $25,000 bond.
[49:24.000 --> 49:26.000]  Somehow he got a court on a 10.
[49:26.000 --> 49:30.000]  So either the judge set that or the district attorney asked that
[49:30.000 --> 49:31.000]  to be set.
[49:31.000 --> 49:33.000]  So I have to ask that question.
[49:33.000 --> 49:34.000]  Is that how I...
[49:34.000 --> 49:37.000]  Well, you need the paperwork that was submitted for the bond,
[49:37.000 --> 49:39.000]  one way or the other.
[49:39.000 --> 49:43.000]  That will tell you what was done by who.
[49:43.000 --> 49:46.000]  Okay.
[49:46.000 --> 49:47.000]  Okay.
[49:47.000 --> 49:51.000]  Once I know who lowballed that, whether it be the judge,
[49:51.000 --> 49:53.000]  the district attorney, or they worked together,
[49:53.000 --> 49:54.000]  here's the other thing.
[49:54.000 --> 49:57.000]  There's been three prosecutors in just a month assigned to this
[49:57.000 --> 50:00.000]  case, so I can't get ahold of anybody because they keep
[50:00.000 --> 50:03.000]  flipping them, and nobody's called me back.
[50:03.000 --> 50:05.000]  So I don't know who to hold accountable.
[50:05.000 --> 50:07.000]  And the judge that's going to be in the next hearing...
[50:07.000 --> 50:08.000]  All lowballing.
[50:08.000 --> 50:09.000]  Okay.
[50:09.000 --> 50:11.000]  And then the judge that's going to be in the next hearing is
[50:11.000 --> 50:14.000]  different from the initial bond judge and who is different from
[50:14.000 --> 50:17.000]  the charge hearing.
[50:17.000 --> 50:19.000]  And the next hearing is going to be just...
[50:19.000 --> 50:20.000]  Well, that's okay.
[50:20.000 --> 50:23.000]  The judges should be different in certain proceedings because
[50:23.000 --> 50:26.000]  what you don't want is to create a judge that's prejudiced
[50:26.000 --> 50:29.000]  against the case before it ever gets to trial or favorable to
[50:29.000 --> 50:32.000]  the case before it ever gets to trial.
[50:32.000 --> 50:35.000]  What you want is a neutral person setting the bond that has
[50:35.000 --> 50:39.000]  no cat in this fight or dog in this fight, so to speak,
[50:39.000 --> 50:42.000]  when it comes to the outcome of the case.
[50:42.000 --> 50:44.000]  They're just there to set the bond.
[50:44.000 --> 50:47.000]  They look at the facts and the evidence and go from there
[50:47.000 --> 50:50.000]  based upon whatever state law is or whatever current procedure
[50:50.000 --> 50:56.000]  is at that time versus the actual trial court judge who is
[50:56.000 --> 51:04.000]  the one who is going to be the finder of fact in the case.
[51:04.000 --> 51:08.000]  Okay.
[51:08.000 --> 51:11.000]  So there's another tidbit I need to throw in here from Wyoming
[51:11.000 --> 51:13.000]  just to let you know what's going on, probably not just
[51:13.000 --> 51:15.000]  this area but everywhere.
[51:15.000 --> 51:21.000]  So there's some leftist politics even seeping way up into that
[51:21.000 --> 51:24.000]  area, I mean, Liz Cheney for God's sake.
[51:24.000 --> 51:28.000]  But we got to meet the district attorney up there actually
[51:28.000 --> 51:29.000]  in Cheyenne.
[51:29.000 --> 51:34.000]  She came to one of the local, I guess, Republican meetings
[51:34.000 --> 51:36.000]  just to talk about what she's feeling like.
[51:36.000 --> 51:39.000]  And they're trying to get her out because she's actually been
[51:39.000 --> 51:41.000]  fighting for the people and trying to do the right thing.
[51:41.000 --> 51:46.000]  So another tactic they used up there was they defunded her.
[51:46.000 --> 51:50.000]  So now she's working with minimal staff to try to prosecute
[51:50.000 --> 51:52.000]  criminal activity.
[51:52.000 --> 51:55.000]  And then when she couldn't effectively prosecute all that
[51:55.000 --> 51:58.000]  criminal activity, she had to choose which one she was doing.
[51:58.000 --> 52:01.000]  And then by kind of what we're talking about, she had to let
[52:01.000 --> 52:03.000]  go some of the lesser crimes.
[52:03.000 --> 52:04.000]  Right.
[52:04.000 --> 52:09.000]  Well, see, there's a difference between them having no choice
[52:09.000 --> 52:13.000]  based upon a lack of money and personnel to get the job done
[52:13.000 --> 52:18.000]  and them having the means but refusing to do it.
[52:18.000 --> 52:20.000]  There is a difference there.
[52:20.000 --> 52:21.000]  Okay.
[52:21.000 --> 52:22.000]  So I agree.
[52:22.000 --> 52:26.000]  But then they were using that as a political weapon to get her out.
[52:26.000 --> 52:30.000]  And she would say point blank, I can't put somebody in jail for
[52:30.000 --> 52:35.000]  stealing $750 when there's other people killing people in the town.
[52:35.000 --> 52:38.000]  And I don't have the resources to do that.
[52:38.000 --> 52:41.000]  So that's basically what she was sharing with us so that we could
[52:41.000 --> 52:45.000]  rally when I was living up there and get her the support she needed.
[52:45.000 --> 52:48.000]  I mean, they had her in court and everything.
[52:48.000 --> 52:52.000]  She lost all of her savings and then they took a second mortgage.
[52:52.000 --> 52:54.000]  I mean, just crazy stuff they're doing to this woman.
[52:54.000 --> 52:55.000]  All right.
[52:55.000 --> 52:57.000]  So I don't think Colorado is like that.
[52:57.000 --> 53:01.000]  I think Colorado is just lazy kind of like California in many ways.
[53:01.000 --> 53:05.000]  Well, having lived in Colorado myself, believe me, they're just as
[53:05.000 --> 53:08.000]  corrupt when they want to be as anybody else.
[53:08.000 --> 53:10.000]  Okay.
[53:10.000 --> 53:13.000]  So when I find out these answers, this is what I'm trying to do is
[53:13.000 --> 53:14.000]  get a roadmap.
[53:14.000 --> 53:16.000]  That's why I'm asking these questions.
[53:16.000 --> 53:19.000]  Well, because I've been telling the deputies, look, I've been helping you.
[53:19.000 --> 53:21.000]  We've been working as a team.
[53:21.000 --> 53:23.000]  But if you're going to tell me in the end, you've got to drop this and
[53:23.000 --> 53:25.000]  there's nothing you can do, well, that's because you got a badge.
[53:25.000 --> 53:26.000]  I don't.
[53:26.000 --> 53:30.000]  What can I do to raise some heat from these people who are screwing the
[53:30.000 --> 53:32.000]  system and causing more crime?
[53:32.000 --> 53:35.000]  And they don't know what to say.
[53:35.000 --> 53:37.000]  You know, they're not going to say.
[53:37.000 --> 53:41.000]  But if the judge did this, then I have to go after the judge.
[53:41.000 --> 53:43.000]  If the district attorney did this, then I have to go after the district
[53:43.000 --> 53:46.000]  attorney and whoever else isn't going to do their job.
[53:46.000 --> 53:49.000]  Well, the question is, is what do you mean by go after?
[53:49.000 --> 53:54.000]  See, as the victim, you should have certain rights protected by the Bill
[53:54.000 --> 53:56.000]  of Rights of your state constitution.
[53:56.000 --> 54:00.000]  Here in Texas, we have in the Bill of Rights, crime victims' rights that
[54:00.000 --> 54:03.000]  are specifically written into the Bill of Rights.
[54:03.000 --> 54:04.000]  Okay.
[54:04.000 --> 54:08.000]  You may have means there as far as going after the individuals or making
[54:08.000 --> 54:11.000]  the state cover some of the costs or whatever.
[54:11.000 --> 54:16.000]  But as far as going after them, the only avenues you've really got when it
[54:16.000 --> 54:21.000]  comes to going after these judges and these prosecutors is to file bar
[54:21.000 --> 54:25.000]  grievances and judicial conduct complaints against them because you don't
[54:25.000 --> 54:28.000]  have any grounds to actually sue them.
[54:28.000 --> 54:29.000]  Okay.
[54:29.000 --> 54:35.000]  There won't be a cause of action available to you to stand on to sue them.
[54:35.000 --> 54:41.000]  See, this is the problem that I've said for a while about every state
[54:41.000 --> 54:43.000]  constitution.
[54:43.000 --> 54:49.000]  Not a single constitution in any state puts the teeth where they belong in
[54:49.000 --> 54:55.000]  the mouth of the people and their hands rather than in the government that
[54:55.000 --> 54:58.000]  it was designed to regulate.
[54:58.000 --> 55:02.000]  We need to have the power to hold these people accountable directly.
[55:02.000 --> 55:08.000]  Outside of the system, we gave them to do what they do.
[55:08.000 --> 55:11.000]  That way, see, they can't manipulate that system.
[55:11.000 --> 55:15.000]  They don't control that system.
[55:15.000 --> 55:18.000]  We should be able to form people's grand juries.
[55:18.000 --> 55:23.000]  We should be able to convene people's district courts.
[55:23.000 --> 55:30.000]  And their sole purpose should be to target public officials, not the
[55:30.000 --> 55:35.000]  criminals, not other citizens, the public officials specifically.
[55:35.000 --> 55:40.000]  I don't care what level of public official, what office they hold.
[55:40.000 --> 55:44.000]  If they're accused of a violation of the constitution, a rights of the
[55:44.000 --> 55:49.000]  member of the public, or a state law, then they can be subpoenaed and
[55:49.000 --> 55:55.000]  charged and prosecuted directly in a citizen's court.
[55:55.000 --> 56:01.000]  That way, they are truly answering to the people they're screwing over.
[56:01.000 --> 56:05.000]  How long do you think the corruptness in this system would last if they
[56:05.000 --> 56:08.000]  knew they could be held accountable in that way?
[56:08.000 --> 56:10.000]  It'd be over in a week.
[56:10.000 --> 56:16.000]  If not sooner, they would head for the hills so fast, they'd leave without
[56:16.000 --> 56:20.000]  their luggage.
[56:20.000 --> 56:22.000]  You're probably right.
[56:22.000 --> 56:27.000]  Because they would know that the moment something like that was made into a
[56:27.000 --> 56:30.000]  constitutional protection, they were hosed.
[56:30.000 --> 56:34.000]  And all they could do was run.
[56:34.000 --> 56:38.000]  Because the ones stupid enough to stand there and try to say why they were
[56:38.000 --> 56:45.000]  doing what they were doing, they're going to be the first ones to swing.
[56:45.000 --> 56:50.000]  And I don't mean like playing baseball.
[56:50.000 --> 57:01.000]  They're going to start their entire new career, wind chime.
[57:01.000 --> 57:07.000]  So if the state constitutions were truly intended to protect the rights of the
[57:07.000 --> 57:11.000]  people the way they ought to, the Bill of Rights would have been done a whole
[57:11.000 --> 57:14.000]  lot different, a whole lot different.
[57:14.000 --> 57:19.000]  And all of the power to hold the government accountable would be in it.
[57:19.000 --> 57:23.000]  Not using the systems of government that was created to be managed by it, but
[57:23.000 --> 57:27.000]  one completely separate and apart, completely within the control of the
[57:27.000 --> 57:31.000]  people themselves.
[57:31.000 --> 57:34.000]  If we want to change things, we need to see about getting an amendment to our
[57:34.000 --> 57:38.000]  state constitutions that puts that in our Bill of Rights, that we have the
[57:38.000 --> 57:43.000]  sole power to hold accountable any public official for a violation of any
[57:43.000 --> 57:47.000]  law of the state, the constitution of the state, their oath of office, and
[57:47.000 --> 57:53.000]  it does not matter what office they hold, whether it be judicial, legislative,
[57:53.000 --> 57:55.000]  or executive.
[57:55.000 --> 57:59.000]  Judges, prosecutors, attorneys, doesn't matter.
[57:59.000 --> 58:01.000]  They violate the constitution.
[58:01.000 --> 58:04.000]  They are directly answerable to us.
[58:04.000 --> 58:14.000]  That would be their greatest fear bar none.
[58:14.000 --> 58:16.000]  All right, we got another break coming up, Chris.
[58:16.000 --> 58:18.000]  Hang on, you got more?
[58:18.000 --> 58:22.000]  Well, yeah, I want to get kind of a little bit more guidance here, and then
[58:22.000 --> 58:24.000]  if you got any callers, we'll go to those.
[58:24.000 --> 58:27.000]  All right, well, I don't have any other callers at the moment, so just hang on
[58:27.000 --> 58:29.000]  and we'll get you after the break.
[58:29.000 --> 58:33.000]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984.
[58:33.000 --> 58:35.000]  We're going to need somebody else to talk to here.
[58:35.000 --> 58:37.000]  I'm going to go back to die traveling here on the stuff I've been working on
[58:37.000 --> 58:38.000]  if we don't.
[58:38.000 --> 58:40.000]  In the meantime, y'all hang on.
[58:40.000 --> 58:50.000]  We'll be right back after the break.
[59:10.000 --> 59:13.000]  The new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:22.000 --> 59:26.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever
[59:26.000 --> 59:28.000]  experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:32.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for
[59:32.000 --> 59:33.000]  the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:38.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll
[59:38.000 --> 59:47.000]  free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:04.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:04.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:09.000]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:09.000 --> 01:00:13.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to
[01:00:13.000 --> 01:00:16.000]  remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:18.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:25.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish
[01:00:25.000 --> 01:00:26.000]  too.
[01:00:26.000 --> 01:00:27.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:31.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:31.000 --> 01:00:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:00:34.000 --> 01:00:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the
[01:00:37.000 --> 01:00:41.000]  private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:45.000]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:51.000]  around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:55.000]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear
[01:00:55.000 --> 01:00:59.000]  arms, arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away
[01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:00.000]  without a fight.
[01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:01.000]  Get it?
[01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:06.000]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second
[01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:10.000]  Amendment so well when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is
[01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:14.000]  just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against
[01:01:14.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  the tyranny, which now appears remote in America, but which historically has
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:20.000]  proved to always be possible.
[01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:33.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:37.000]  You may think our brains deteriorate with age, but new research shows that
[01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:40.000]  as brains get older, they actually work more efficiently.
[01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht back with new research on how aging makes the
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:47.000]  mind sharper after this.
[01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:49.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:52.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.000 --> 01:01:56.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish
[01:01:56.000 --> 01:01:57.000]  too.
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:01:59.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:02.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:05.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:09.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine
[01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:12.000]  alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:19.000]  It's a widely held notion that the older people get, the more
[01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  doddering they become.
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:24.000]  But new research shows that even as our brains age, they can actually
[01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:26.000]  become more efficient.
[01:02:26.000 --> 01:02:30.000]  Scientists asked two groups of volunteers, one age 18 to 35 and the
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  other 55 to 75, to associate different words with given topics.
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:38.000]  At one point, they told everyone they'd made a mistake.
[01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  When that happened, the younger group's brains lit up and lost focus.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:46.000]  But the older group's brains didn't even flinch, and they stayed focused on
[01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:48.000]  solving the next task.
[01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  The moral?
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:51.000]  There's something to be said for experience.
[01:02:51.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:01.000]  search engine.
[01:03:01.000 --> 01:03:13.000]  We make our own whiskey and our own smoke too Ain't too many things these old boys can't do
[01:03:13.000 --> 01:03:20.000]  We grow good old tomatoes and homemade wine And country boy can survive
[01:03:20.000 --> 01:03:27.000]  Country boy can survive
[01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:31.000]  Because you can't drive us out and you can't make us run
[01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:36.000]  Those wooden old boys say don't shot guns
[01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:45.000]  We say crazy, we say ma'am If you ain't into that, we don't give a damn
[01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:51.000]  We came from the West Virginia coal mines And the Rocky Mountains and the Western
[01:03:51.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  skies
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:07.000]  The preacher man says it's the end of time And the Mississippi River, she's a gold
[01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:13.000]  drive
[01:04:13.000 --> 01:04:18.000]  The interest is up and the stock market's down And you're only getting mugged if you
[01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:20.000]  go downtown
[01:04:20.000 --> 01:04:22.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:27.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, The Calling, number 512-646-1984.
[01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:28.000]  We got an hour left in the show.
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:30.000]  I need some people to talk to.
[01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:33.000]  Right now, I am still talking with Chris in Colorado.
[01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:35.000]  All right, Chris, go ahead.
[01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  Okay, so when I find out what the judge or the prosecutor contributed to frustrating the
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:49.000]  whole detective section and myself, then I may be able to do judicial conduct complaint
[01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:51.000]  or some bar grievances.
[01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:52.000]  Yes.
[01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:53.000]  Okay.
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  So another example, back when I didn't know really what to do, just my towing thing back
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:01.000]  in Chicago.
[01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:06.000]  So I knew just to keep going, but I didn't find what I needed to know.
[01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  But then the city brought those people, that towing company, into court.
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:15.000]  And they did their job from what I could see.
[01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  And they even added a charge, consumer fraud, which was great because it opened up a whole
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  new door for me.
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:24.000]  But when I looked that up, I was like, wow, I didn't even know that was coming.
[01:05:24.000 --> 01:05:27.000]  And so I looked up the charge for consumer fraud.
[01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:32.000]  And what I saw was it's basically no less than $2,000 for that charge.
[01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:33.000]  Right.
[01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:38.000]  Well, they charged them $500.
[01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  And the end charge for them total was $1,000 for the other two fines.
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  They had like three or four fines.
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:59.000]  Well, remember, was that enacted before or after the offense was committed against you?
[01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:00.000]  I don't understand.
[01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  What was enacted?
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:06.000]  The statute you're talking about.
[01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:14.000]  Well, this was a city ordinance for a fine to be given to somebody who was convicted of consumer fraud.
[01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:15.000]  Right.
[01:06:15.000 --> 01:06:18.000]  But consumer fraud is a state law case.
[01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:20.000]  Well, that's another thing.
[01:06:20.000 --> 01:06:21.000]  That's a whole other topic.
[01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:27.000]  But this was a city ordinance that pulled its power from the state act for consumer fraud.
[01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  My question, however, is what does the state law say the maximum and minimums are and when was it enacted in relation to the commission of the offense against you?
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:46.000]  If it came before the offense was committed against you, then it should very well be controlling.
[01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  If it came after the offense against you was committed, then the one that was there prior or whatever it replaced prior would be controlling.
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  I'm pretty sure that this Consumer Fraud Act on the state level has been there for many years.
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:06.000]  Well, the same thing would apply if they're trying to charge them under an ordinance.
[01:07:06.000 --> 01:07:07.000]  Same deal.
[01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:08.000]  Okay.
[01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:15.000]  Now, the question is, is did the ordinance do something different than what the state law said was to be done?
[01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:23.000]  If so, the ordinance is invalid because the ordinance cannot rewrite the state law.
[01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:24.000]  Right.
[01:07:24.000 --> 01:07:35.000]  Well, unlike most things that go on from a state law to a city, the city will add to it to make it more inclusive for the city residents.
[01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:42.000]  Yes, but their additions cannot alter a provision or violate a provision.
[01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:49.000]  Right. Their ordinance, however, for the consumer fraud is inverted.
[01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  They pull their power exclusively from the state act and they just have a city ordinance with their own coding, but it's the same wording.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:02.000]  That's my argument because I'm having a hard time in court right now.
[01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  The judge doesn't want it in this court and he's playing games.
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:09.000]  I'm going to have to do an appeal just to get them to do the right thing.
[01:08:09.000 --> 01:08:18.000]  I'm also talking to an alderman because they're baffled that consumer protection isn't actually provided through the towing law.
[01:08:18.000 --> 01:08:20.000]  But anyway, that's regardless.
[01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:21.000]  That's my other issue.
[01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:34.000]  But the point is that I found something from what I read, and I can reread it, but from what I read back then, the minimum fine was $2,000 for consumer fraud, the minimum, and they dropped it below that.
[01:08:34.000 --> 01:08:51.000]  So if I start to find something like that in Colorado where they're taking a law that says this is what you're supposed to do, the minimum, and you didn't do that, you made up your own application, what you thought, how do I start to hold them accountable like that?
[01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:53.000]  Is that still judicial?
[01:08:53.000 --> 01:08:58.000]  Well, you have to sue for the ordinance to be in violation of state law.
[01:08:58.000 --> 01:09:04.000]  You have to sue for that and win.
[01:09:04.000 --> 01:09:14.000]  Well, let's say the judge got sufficient notice that the only way, and so did the prosecutor, that they couldn't give them any less than a $25,000 bond.
[01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:21.000]  And then they decided, well, we're just going to throw dice out today and whatever number that comes up, that's the bond we're going to do.
[01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:28.000]  And the law says, no, the minimum for this charge is a $25,000 bond or a $20,000 bond, and you went to 10.
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:33.000]  You know, what do the civilians say to that when they broke the law, essentially?
[01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:39.000]  Well, I just told you, the city cannot do what the state law says it can't do.
[01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:44.000]  And if the state law said the minimum is this, then the city is required to comply with that.
[01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  When they don't, their ordinance is invalid because it is not in compliance with state law.
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:55.000]  And the city cannot create law on its own.
[01:09:55.000 --> 01:10:14.000]  Any ordinance it does must be based upon a state law or it is internal to the city only and cannot be used outside of the city and its employees and its contractors and legal entities operating within its territorial borders.
[01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:20.000]  But it cannot be binding public law upon the people.
[01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:26.000]  So in Colorado, this will be a county court, Arapahoe County Court.
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  So I don't know how that's going to – I'm assuming that's going to be state law they're going to be using, not the city of whatever that is.
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:38.000]  Correct.
[01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  The county court isn't using – it may do stuff on county ordinances, but it's not going to do things on municipal ordinances.
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:47.000]  Okay. So we're going to be dealing with state law anyway.
[01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:56.000]  So if I read through state law and I figure it out and I talk and I get some insight as to why the detective said we're recommending a $25,000 bond,
[01:10:56.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  and then I found out either the DA or the judge recommended a $10,000 bond, and I find out that's actually in violation of the law as to what was presented for evidence.
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:13.000]  This is what I have never done and I don't know what to do.
[01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:16.000]  How do I at least get something on the record to hold them accountable?
[01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:21.000]  Again, you can file judicial conduct complaints against them for not complying with state law.
[01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:29.000]  They're using their bench to legislate from the bench by doing things outside of what the law legally requires them to do.
[01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:32.000]  Okay. All right.
[01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  And you can also check and see if Colorado has recall capability for judges and prosecuting attorneys like they do for some other offices.
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:53.000]  If you can recall them or get them fired based upon something in state law, go with that. Use it.
[01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:58.000]  Okay. All right.
[01:11:58.000 --> 01:12:02.000]  So I'll look up. I don't even know how the process works. That's kind of why I called in tonight.
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:12.000]  When somebody gets arrested, you have somebody filing a case that's usually deputy or officer. In this case, it was a deputy.
[01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:19.000]  Now we got a case. Then it was assigned to the detective. The detective was going to do his job, but we ended up speeding it up very quickly.
[01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:27.000]  The head of the detective department, the sergeant there, ordered a new detective to get on this immediately.
[01:12:27.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  He did. And then he filed everything. He's only got 72 hours to type everything up to make sure that this guy is getting charged and booked and charged properly.
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:41.000]  He was arrested. So I don't know how this process works. I'm still green.
[01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  And then he presents the case to the DA. The DA gets them and they're up for the bond hearing or the first hearing.
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:56.000]  And that's where some discussion goes down. And I don't know how to learn how that process is supposed to work.
[01:12:56.000 --> 01:13:10.000]  I'm kind of well following to learn where to find all this information because they're not going to tell me, you know, how that procedure works and where the levels are set and what the rules are.
[01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:16.000]  That's why it's open because you've been in this process. You had done it a while ago, but you're still doing lots of it now.
[01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  Yeah, it really depends upon what the laws are in your state for making complaints, how they're acted upon, what the law required them to do.
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:32.000]  See, your rules of procedure will be similar in many ways, but also different in some ways.
[01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  OK, the general overall requirements will be the same everywhere, but the specifics may not be.
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  So you're going to have to do a lot of reading. That's where I got how I got to where I am.
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:59.000]  A lot of reading, a lot of cross referencing, a lot of matching of things together so I could find the stuff that's related in paramateria, as they say,
[01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  and then put it all together in a cohesive argument that says based upon all these provisions, this is what you were required to do versus what you actually did.
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:14.000]  And what you actually did violated this in the following ways.
[01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:31.000]  And because of that, you have committed these various crimes or these various inconsistencies with your oath of office and the rules of judicial conduct and professional ethics, et cetera, et cetera, and go after them for that.
[01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:39.000]  OK. And by going after them, I file the complaint, but can I go after them further after that?
[01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:45.000]  Again, you will not have a personal cause of action. I'm almost positive.
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:51.000]  Now, if you do, great, but I don't know who you're going to find to tell you that's the case.
[01:14:51.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  OK. Well, I'm just trying to get this on record. You know, every little bit you're talking about starting up a people's court or getting a people's court,
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:03.000]  because that would be the most constitutional approach to holding public officials accountable.
[01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  Yeah. But until we amend the Constitution to make that happen, that's just a thought. That's not that's not a reality.
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:16.000]  I know it's a good thought, though. So how do we how do we steer this boat, this big ass broken down ship?
[01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:32.000]  Well, we've got to find some way to write that as a constitutional amendment to the Bill of Rights and then or its own chapter of the state constitution, whatever it may be, and then use that.
[01:15:32.000 --> 01:15:40.000]  We've got to flesh it out just as if it was a law and write it into the Constitution in a way that cannot be misinterpreted and misapplied.
[01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:47.000]  And then we've got to get it voted on by the majority of the voters of the state, which means we've got to get it put on a ballot for that purpose.
[01:15:47.000 --> 01:15:55.000]  Whatever that procedure is in your state, it's different in your state than it is in Texas. That much I do know.
[01:15:55.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  You know, I saw a little bit of that go down up in Wyoming. They did a thing back in 2012. They put something in the Constitution for people's medical rights that you cannot force any kind of medical treatment.
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:16.000]  And a lot of people use that during the pandemic. I remember seeing that. That was kind of cool. Yeah. Of course, of course, it gets brushed over, right?
[01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:20.000]  There's so much dust on it because nobody uses it. They only pull it out when they when they really need it.
[01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  And then they don't. Well, that's because it's like everything else they try to say about our rights in the Constitution.
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  If we don't exercise them, we lose them because they ignore them. Well, I'm one of those people that I don't ignore any of them.
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:45.000]  And I use all of them and I go after them with all of them. I agree. I don't take no for an answer ever.
[01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  Good for you. The rest of us need to start stepping up like that, for sure.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:54.000]  All right, Eddie, that's all I got, man. Thank you. All right, you're welcome.
[01:16:54.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  All right, folks, hang on. I got one more break coming up here and then we'll get to our next caller.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:06.000]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word?
[01:17:06.000 --> 01:17:17.000]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:50.000]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[01:17:50.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com, Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:18:21.000 --> 01:18:29.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:34.000]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.000 --> 01:18:50.000]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[01:18:50.000 --> 01:18:58.000]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  Learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:28.000 --> 01:19:54.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:54.000 --> 01:19:59.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:04.000]  I got 45 minutes left in this year's show, and I'm going to need some more people to talk to.
[01:20:04.000 --> 01:20:09.000]  Right now, we have one other person up on the board, and that is Jane in Texas.
[01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:14.000]  All right, Jane, what can we do for you?
[01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:16.000]  Ready.
[01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:20.000]  One thing about Chris, what he could do is join it and join your class.
[01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:22.000]  You teach all that stuff.
[01:20:22.000 --> 01:20:23.000]  I try to.
[01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:26.000]  I don't always get everybody listening, but I try to.
[01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:38.000]  I listen, but anyway, okay, so one thing before I talk about the other thing I called you for is if you have a dealership,
[01:20:38.000 --> 01:20:44.000]  you know, a Texas dealership like, say, Nissan, and they blatantly messed you up,
[01:20:44.000 --> 01:20:53.000]  like they did things like change wiring on your alternator to screw it, so you have to buy an alternator from them.
[01:20:53.000 --> 01:21:00.000]  After I left there, I had to go back, and I went through two batteries and alternated before I went back,
[01:21:00.000 --> 01:21:03.000]  and this was when I got my transmission replaced.
[01:21:03.000 --> 01:21:09.000]  But I looked at my secretary of state, and they have like a dealership under the dealership,
[01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:14.000]  like sales mostly, but it doesn't have like a service department.
[01:21:14.000 --> 01:21:27.000]  So I was still getting on the secretary of state website and then find out who gets the registered mail.
[01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:31.000]  You're saying you want to file a consumer complaint against a car dealership?
[01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:33.000]  Yes.
[01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:40.000]  Okay. I don't know what state agency actually handles that, but I'm sure there is one.
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:42.000]  Have you tried looking?
[01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:49.000]  Yeah, I have. I think I'm thinking it might be attorney general. I'm not sure.
[01:21:49.000 --> 01:21:56.000]  Well, how did you look for it? Let's start there. How did you go about looking for it?
[01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:04.000]  Well, it's been a little while. It just came to mind because still I'm having residual issues over because of that dealership.
[01:22:04.000 --> 01:22:09.000]  So I just thought I'd bring it up, but that's not why I called you.
[01:22:09.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  But I just looked online. I thought it was like any lawsuit that you would find out who the person is that you have to sue,
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:22.000]  and then you have to go after them. It has to be in a...
[01:22:22.000 --> 01:22:27.000]  You actually filed the complaint with the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles.
[01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:29.000]  Okay. Why?
[01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:38.000]  And the phone number is 888-368-4689.
[01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:39.000]  Really?
[01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  Really.
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:45.000]  Okay. Well, what they would have the team do with it for?
[01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  Well, because they are the ones that regulate the department. They are the Department of Motor Vehicles.
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  And car dealerships are the sellers of motor vehicles as well as private vehicles.
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:03.000]  Okay. That's interesting. All right.
[01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:14.000]  Well, I'll call them first and they can maybe guide me. Otherwise, I was thinking about just doing the Better Business Bureau complaint.
[01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  Well, the Better Business Bureau doesn't regulate anybody. They just report on them.
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:26.000]  They have no power to make the business do anything. The DMV, however, would.
[01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:30.000]  Okay. All right. Okay. Well, thanks for that.
[01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  Okay. Now, the reason I called is because I need to figure out, I mean, do I need to send you enough for three motions?
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:44.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. I do not write motions for money.
[01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:46.000]  Okay. Sorry.
[01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:58.000]  I write training materials. I write reference materials. Okay. But I do not write individual motions or anything else for people for money.
[01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  Okay. So then training materials then?
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:13.000]  Well, you can either do it the same way you make a donation online or you can do it the way we talked about getting the other person to send in their donation that you were talking about.
[01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:14.000]  Mm-hmm.
[01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:17.000]  You have all the same information I gave to them.
[01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  Okay. Well, I'll do mine online because it's not up to you on the credit card. But so I guess that was…
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:37.000]  Well, then all you do is you make a donation directly to me, but you have to go to the ruleoflawradio.com website to do that. There is no place on logos to donate directly to me.
[01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:45.000]  Okay. So do I need to get two books? Two books or three books or what?
[01:24:45.000 --> 01:25:02.000]  Well, at the moment, you're going to need at least two, which two is dependent upon what all they did. But for right now, we're looking at the training materials relevant to an examining trial, and we're looking at training materials relevant to the city attorney prosecuting the name of the state.
[01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:08.000]  Good. Good. Yeah. Okay. And do I file those at the same time?
[01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  I don't see why not. They're challenged to the same case.
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  Okay. All right. Okay. All right. So where is everybody? You got any other callers waiting on you?
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:24.000]  Well, I don't know at the moment. Probably not. No, I don't.
[01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:30.000]  I don't understand that. I think it's difficult on Monday for people to remember.
[01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:40.000]  Well, I was gone for so long with all the other stuff trying to get this move done that it doesn't surprise me people don't remember, but they don't know whether I'm live or not half the time now.
[01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:45.000]  And I was on for two days and I was off for a day because I got sick with the sinus infection.
[01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:58.000]  So, you know, they're kind of flip-flopping. But we are live tonight, folks. Like I said, I am going to be doing my very, very best to be on here every Monday night now as much as I can to get this done.
[01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:08.000]  The only time I'm not going to be here is if there's something completely beyond my control or I'm just it just hurts too bad to be here because I'm sick with something.
[01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:18.000]  Fortunately, I always get sick exactly the same way for exactly the same reason. We had all these big barometric swings here because of the temperatures.
[01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:27.000]  We were having 115, 120 degree days and then we were having seven high 70s and low 80 nights.
[01:26:27.000 --> 01:26:41.000]  And my sinus just went absolutely haywire over that. And so that's that was the deal. I got my sinuses dried out really bad and got infected.
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  And I had a massive sinus headache. I barely look at this TV screen because it looked like staring into the sum of my eyes held wide open.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  Well, so we're going to have class on Thursday, right?
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  Yes. Once again, class is the same way. Class will be ongoing unless something actually happens where I have no choice but to cancel it or reschedule it.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:20.000]  Okay. All right. Well, okay. So then anyway, when I get ready to do what I got to do, I think that is the Court of Dallas County Court of Criminal Appeals is what I have to go through first according to SB.
[01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:30.000]  Yes, it is. Yeah. And the Dallas County Criminal Appeals is the one that decided Martin. And we've got we've got to call their bluff.
[01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:40.000]  Okay. Okay. Are they the one that decided the Bailey one too? Or does that one matter?
[01:27:40.000 --> 01:27:55.000]  I hadn't looked at Bailey specifically. Well, I mean, I have, but I don't remember which court put that out. But what I did look at, every one of them was put out by an appellate court.
[01:27:55.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  None of them were put out by the Court of Criminal Appeals.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  Okay. Yeah, I was looking for the Court of Criminal Appeals and I found them and I was trying to- Well, you're going to have to go over the appellate court.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  There's no question. You're going to have to do multiple appeals because the Dallas appellate court is populated with morons as we've seen.
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  I know. Yeah. I just like to see them get find their way out of, you know, what I've already seen, you know, as far as what we've learned in class.
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:42.000]  And I think this, I mean, because the people that did challenge them, they didn't really have much of a fight. You know, I mean, they just, boom, this is one thing just like I did in the municipal court. Remember?
[01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:53.000]  I mean, I had a couple of little challenges in the Constitution and then, you know, then they told me what, you know, then they convicted me, you know, just like they did them.
[01:28:53.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  You know, but they didn't really have much of a challenge.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:09.000]  Well, I can say there's a lot more to writing a challenge to Constitution now than just saying it violates the Constitution.
[01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:21.000]  And as you saw from just the part, the one third of the motion we've covered in class, I go out of my way to seal up every possible argument they could come up with.
[01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  I know. That's what I like. Yeah.
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:25.000]  Exactly.
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  I mean, they are not going to be able to sit there and just blow it off because I'm going to take their own case and I'm going to use it against them.
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:39.000]  Good, good, good, good.
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  Okay, you got music.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  Yes, ma'am. I got another break here. All right, folks, 512-646-1984.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:54.000]  Oh, let's see. I got a half an hour left. I'd still like to have some extra people to talk to, but let's get on with it here. Give us a call.
[01:29:54.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  We'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang on.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:05.000]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number, and date of birth.
[01:30:05.000 --> 01:30:12.000]  But you should think twice before giving away your personal data. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll say more in just a moment.
[01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:19.000]  Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:20.000]  That's creepy.
[01:30:20.000 --> 01:30:25.000]  But it doesn't have to be that way. Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:39.000]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:49.000]  Forms, forms, forms. They're everywhere. But just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it.
[01:30:49.000 --> 01:30:56.000]  I write blank spaces on forms all the time, or I write N slash A for not applicable, and usually nobody notices or cares.
[01:30:56.000 --> 01:31:03.000]  I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement,
[01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  and I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization unless I actually want them to call me, and that's pretty rare.
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests.
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:18.000]  It's like exercising a muscle. It gets easier the more you do it.
[01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:40.000]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:40.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:48.000]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7,
[01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:02.000]  Go to buildingwhat.org. Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:17.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:32:17.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:30.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy A. Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:30.000 --> 01:32:35.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:35.000 --> 01:32:37.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:37.000 --> 01:32:42.000]  You can get a copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:42.000 --> 01:32:46.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:52.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:52.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:33:01.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:11.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:44.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:44.000 --> 01:33:46.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:46.000 --> 01:33:51.000]  Call it number 512-646-1984.
[01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:53.000]  All right, let's see if this thing is actually working here.
[01:33:53.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  Yeah, it's working.
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  Okay.
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  Now, let's get back to Jane in Texas.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:00.000]  All right, Jane, go ahead.
[01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:03.000]  I just got through posting on Telegram that you were live, so I don't know.
[01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:06.000]  I wouldn't have done it before, but I didn't think about it.
[01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:12.000]  But, okay, anyway, so do you want me to just hang up and you can talk about what you learned,
[01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:17.000]  what you found out about Martin and NASC?
[01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:20.000]  Well, I've got another caller up on the board here after you,
[01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:22.000]  and that's what I'm hoping to have to close out the show with is callers.
[01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:26.000]  I don't want to have to diatribe the whole show if I don't have to.
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  Do you have any other questions or anything?
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  No, but I'll just do what I've got to do when I hang up,
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:35.000]  and then I'll wait for what I've got to wait for.
[01:34:35.000 --> 01:34:36.000]  It's okay.
[01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  Okay.
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:38.000]  All right.
[01:34:38.000 --> 01:34:39.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:41.000]  All right.
[01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  Next caller up.
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:44.000]  I do not have a name.
[01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:48.000]  Area code 971, it looks like.
[01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  Are you there?
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:53.000]  I'll be there, and you'll be there.
[01:34:53.000 --> 01:34:55.000]  Raider, what do you need?
[01:34:55.000 --> 01:34:58.000]  It's a one-minute, two-frame radio.
[01:34:58.000 --> 01:35:03.000]  The only thing I've got to tell you is 13 months, and I have not been bothered.
[01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:05.000]  Okay.
[01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:07.000]  That's what I want to tell you.
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:10.000]  So I don't know if it's given up.
[01:35:10.000 --> 01:35:17.000]  I don't know if it's because of the nationwide defunding of the police,
[01:35:17.000 --> 01:35:22.000]  restricting their duties on the road.
[01:35:22.000 --> 01:35:24.000]  They only go to essential calls or whatever.
[01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  I have no idea.
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:34.000]  It may be that they're restricted to only responding to essential calls
[01:35:34.000 --> 01:35:39.000]  or, you know, emergency more than likely.
[01:35:39.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  I don't know.
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  It's just speculation, but the fact of the matter is they're leaving me alone.
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:52.000]  Well, let's see how long that lasts.
[01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:56.000]  I'll keep you posted.
[01:35:56.000 --> 01:35:57.000]  Okay.
[01:35:57.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  Appreciate it.
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  Six years.
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:08.000]  It took them their six years to get them to finally stop.
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:12.000]  Oh, God, I have them on the side of the road watching me go by.
[01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  I share a deputy on my bumper.
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:24.000]  But each and every time they chose not to make the seizure.
[01:36:24.000 --> 01:36:29.000]  Well, maybe they finally bothered to read the statute.
[01:36:29.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  They went to where I told them to go.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:35.000]  Go to the law books and look in there and see what the bill is
[01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:37.000]  and what was in it originally.
[01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:43.000]  What does it say?
[01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:50.000]  That it originally was always intended for the regulation of commercial users of the roadway.
[01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:52.000]  Yeah, we know that.
[01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:57.000]  Yeah, but seeing is believing.
[01:36:57.000 --> 01:37:04.000]  And if they followed what I told them to look at, then maybe that's it.
[01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:10.000]  And I probably think that that so-called judge is probably tired of seeing me.
[01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:13.000]  Well, that's not a possibility, but we'll see.
[01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  Yeah, that's a possibility.
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:20.000]  They'll all come out in the wash.
[01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:24.000]  So I'm glad you kept plugging along and you made a change.
[01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:28.000]  I wish you well in your new settings.
[01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:34.000]  Do look into issues of dehydration.
[01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  That's the greatest factor is what causes those sinus headaches.
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  Trust me, it's not dehydration.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:45.000]  I hydrate constantly.
[01:37:45.000 --> 01:37:47.000]  It's not dehydration.
[01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  Okay, then it might be magnesium, potassium, something that you don't have enough of.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:59.000]  It's not any of those either because I make sure I have enough of them.
[01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:05.000]  My sinuses are very, very sensitive to barometric swings.
[01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:11.000]  It's got nothing to do with what I'm consuming and everything to do with what the outside world is doing
[01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:16.000]  because I can literally feel it when the barometer changes directions.
[01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:19.000]  I immediately feel it.
[01:38:19.000 --> 01:38:25.000]  And I hear it sounds the same way inside of my head that it sounds like when I've been diving
[01:38:25.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  and I'm coming up and taking my safety stops and I'm letting the nitrogen dissipate from my blood
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  and it goes into my sinus cavities.
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  You can hear the little blood bubbles popping as they actually secrete out of the blood
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  and into the membranes and then into the actual cavity of your sinuses.
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  You can literally hear that and feel that.
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:55.000]  Well, that's exactly what my sinuses do when the barometer swings big.
[01:38:55.000 --> 01:38:58.000]  I used to have them all the time myself too.
[01:38:58.000 --> 01:39:03.000]  And I know when I increased my potassium and my magnesium, I made sure to do that.
[01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  I didn't have this problem.
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  I didn't get sinus headaches.
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  Sometimes I had a sinus headache.
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  I don't get sinus headaches as far as just getting them on a regular basis goes.
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:24.000]  I usually only have this problem twice a year when the seasons change from summer to actual winter rather than fall.
[01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:31.000]  And when they go back from winter to summer without the actual spring,
[01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  those changes are too gradual.
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  But when they do it suddenly like they're prone to do here in Texas,
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:45.000]  you get a 30-degree swing in temperature and 20 points in a barometer in less than 24 hours.
[01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:49.000]  My sinuses know it.
[01:39:49.000 --> 01:39:52.000]  So yeah, I know what causes it.
[01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  I just don't know what to do to prevent it.
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:39:56.000]  Right.
[01:39:56.000 --> 01:39:59.000]  Well, I used to live there in Texas for a little while.
[01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:04.000]  So I can relate to the swings where I grew up.
[01:40:04.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  One day was different from the next.
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:09.000]  Okay.
[01:40:09.000 --> 01:40:11.000]  Well, if you don't have anything else, I got another caller up on the board.
[01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:12.000]  All right.
[01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:13.000]  All right.
[01:40:13.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  I'll keep you up to date.
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:17.000]  But that is so far so so far so good.
[01:40:17.000 --> 01:40:18.000]  All right.
[01:40:18.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  Now have a good one, Raider.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:20.000]  All right.
[01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:21.000]  All right.
[01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:22.000]  Thanks.
[01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:23.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:24.000]  All right.
[01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:27.000]  Next caller, area code 432.
[01:40:27.000 --> 01:40:29.000]  I don't have a name for you either.
[01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  Who am I talking to, please?
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:33.000]  This is HR.
[01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:36.000]  Hello, HR.
[01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:38.000]  What can I do for you?
[01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:40.000]  Well, you're doing real good.
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:42.000]  I really appreciate what you do.
[01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  I have a question concerning the application of what you're teaching.
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:58.000]  Is there an example of where somebody is like having good results?
[01:40:58.000 --> 01:41:01.000]  Have you got a good story for us as far as?
[01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:03.000]  Well, I got all kinds of stories.
[01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  I mean, the thing about it is I don't hear from a lot of the people that I help about whether they win or lose.
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:13.000]  Sometimes I do.
[01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:14.000]  Sometimes I don't.
[01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:16.000]  Sometimes I'm there for it and sometimes I'm not.
[01:41:16.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  One of the better cases I've had was when we got a girl's case dismissed in the Austin Municipal Court because the Austin Municipal Court was tampering with the court filings
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  and allowing the prosecuting attorney to tamper with the court filings and trying to prevent this girl from getting her due process.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:42.000]  And they were trying to prosecute her for a case of road rage.
[01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:46.000]  And she was not the one at fault in the accident.
[01:41:46.000 --> 01:41:50.000]  The person they weren't prosecuting was the one at fault.
[01:41:50.000 --> 01:41:53.000]  But we got that dismissed outright.
[01:41:53.000 --> 01:41:55.000]  But I was actually there for that one.
[01:41:55.000 --> 01:42:04.000]  I actually helped her personally with that one and was there when I walked her into court the next morning and before she could even sit down,
[01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:13.000]  the judge called her name and said, here's your dismissal order because of the motion that we had filed the Friday before her Monday court appearance,
[01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:21.000]  the motion that made it very clear we had caught them red-handed at tampering with the paperwork.
[01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:29.000]  So, yeah, I got all kinds of stories, but stories aren't proof of anything until you have the paperwork that shows it.
[01:42:29.000 --> 01:42:35.000]  And the thing is, is a lot of my cases that I help people with, not all of them are in courts of record.
[01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:39.000]  A lot of them are in these little municipal and JP courts.
[01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  Here in Texas, JP courts are not courts of record.
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:46.000]  Most small municipalities are not courts of record.
[01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:51.000]  The only major courts of record cases are going to be in the major cities.
[01:42:51.000 --> 01:42:53.000]  And I don't hear from half the people that do that.
[01:42:53.000 --> 01:43:03.000]  I do know that Chris Levinson, one of the people that was in my class, he got convicted at the municipal court level and got the case overturned on appeal.
[01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:05.000]  Same thing with my case.
[01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:08.000]  I got prosecuted in the Austin municipal court.
[01:43:08.000 --> 01:43:11.000]  They found me guilty in violation of law.
[01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  I appealed it and the county court at law number eight overturned the conviction.
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:19.000]  Nobody ever bothers to report that.
[01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  In fact, the county court at law not only overturned my conviction, they ordered the city of Austin to pay all of my appeal costs, which they never did.
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:36.000]  And that means they had to refund my fines, which they also never did.
[01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:40.000]  So, yeah, fair stories.
[01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  Hang on just a second. Let me take this break and then we'll go from there, okay?
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  Okay.
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  Hang on, H.R.
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:51.000]  I'm coming up on the last segment of the show.
[01:43:51.000 --> 01:43:53.000]  I may need another caller before we get off of here.
[01:43:53.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  So y'all hang on and we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:11.000]  And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:40.000]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:40.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:52.000 --> 01:44:59.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:59.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  Order now.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:01.000 --> 01:46:27.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:34.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, caller number 512-646-1984, and we are speaking with H.R.
[01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  All right, H.R., go ahead.
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  Okay, now, like the gentleman that just called, I gathered that he's not in Texas.
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:48.000]  What was the situation with him? What was the
[01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:51.000]  You talking about the first caller I had?
[01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:55.000]  The guy that was just before me said that they hadn't bothered him.
[01:46:55.000 --> 01:47:00.000]  That's a lady. That's Jane.
[01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:06.000]  Okay. And, well, the guy, I thought it was a man.
[01:47:06.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  That was the first caller. That was Chris.
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:15.000]  Chris is in Colorado. Jane is in Texas.
[01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:37.000]  Okay.
[01:47:37.000 --> 01:48:05.000]  And he was asking him, is there a possibility they can get stolen property and all these other offenses that were possibly charged against them, and then they get this really low $10,000 bond?
[01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:11.260]  Jane's is that she was convicted of an offense by a municipal court that was prosecuted by
[01:48:11.260 --> 01:48:16.960]  a city attorney acting as an attorney for the state, which our Texas Constitution specifically
[01:48:16.960 --> 01:48:18.100]  prohibits.
[01:48:18.100 --> 01:48:22.760]  And then we went into the myriad of Texas appeals court, not the court of criminal appeals,
[01:48:22.760 --> 01:48:28.040]  our highest criminal court, but all of the appellate courts in the various parts of Texas
[01:48:28.040 --> 01:48:33.240]  have all come to the same idiotic, moronic conclusion that the Constitution can be rewritten
[01:48:33.240 --> 01:48:40.480]  and overruled by a statute of the legislature granting a delegated power by re-delegating
[01:48:40.480 --> 01:48:47.280]  it from the person, the office it belongs to, to someone it could never belong to.
[01:48:47.280 --> 01:48:49.800]  And that sums up the call.
[01:48:49.800 --> 01:48:59.640]  If the legislature takes it upon themselves, as you just said, they're going to get away
[01:48:59.640 --> 01:49:00.640]  with that.
[01:49:00.640 --> 01:49:06.920]  Nope, not if we challenge the statutes as being unconstitutional.
[01:49:06.920 --> 01:49:12.000]  See the problem that I'm seeing in these appellate cases that I've read on this subject and I'm
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:18.560]  still looking at right here is the, I don't know how the person made the challenge.
[01:49:18.560 --> 01:49:21.840]  All I know is how the court addressed the challenge.
[01:49:21.840 --> 01:49:28.080]  And it sounds to me like all the defense attorney or the pro se defendant did was make a claim
[01:49:28.080 --> 01:49:34.920]  that the act itself was unconstitutional, meaning the delegating of the power to a city
[01:49:34.920 --> 01:49:38.560]  attorney because the Constitution says they can't do it.
[01:49:38.560 --> 01:49:45.800]  What they did not do apparently was exhaust the legal resources available to prove why
[01:49:45.800 --> 01:49:52.880]  that argument is the only valid one to be made, leaving the appellate courts all the
[01:49:52.880 --> 01:50:01.960]  wiggle room in the world to make crap up, which they are prone to doing.
[01:50:01.960 --> 01:50:05.000]  But I don't write my paperwork that way.
[01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:08.000]  My paperwork does not leave them out.
[01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:11.960]  If they're going to rule against it, then they're going to have to violate every single
[01:50:11.960 --> 01:50:17.800]  thing I put in it, state law, the Constitution, all of it.
[01:50:17.800 --> 01:50:25.240]  And then I'm also challenging the specific statute as being inherently unconstitutional,
[01:50:25.240 --> 01:50:31.720]  not the act that the statute itself governs, but the actual statute was enacted in violation
[01:50:31.720 --> 01:50:35.760]  of the Constitution because of what it does and how it got there.
[01:50:35.760 --> 01:50:42.320]  For instance, I'm willing to bet that if I go back and look at the actual bill that added
[01:50:42.320 --> 01:50:48.960]  that provision to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, I will find that that bill was
[01:50:48.960 --> 01:50:55.400]  not enacted in accordance with Texas law and Constitution, which means the bill was invalid
[01:50:55.400 --> 01:51:02.840]  on its face to begin with, not just the statutes in it, but the whole bill and everything that
[01:51:02.840 --> 01:51:05.840]  was in it.
[01:51:05.840 --> 01:51:10.280]  You see?
[01:51:10.280 --> 01:51:12.000]  So will they get away with it?
[01:51:12.000 --> 01:51:16.320]  Only if they continue to ignore what it says.
[01:51:16.320 --> 01:51:18.800]  And that is always a risk.
[01:51:18.800 --> 01:51:23.560]  But we have to make it where if they do that, then the next court up is going to have to
[01:51:23.560 --> 01:51:25.560]  look at it and go, you know what, guys?
[01:51:25.560 --> 01:51:27.400]  You cannot get away with this.
[01:51:27.400 --> 01:51:29.120]  What you're doing is dead wrong.
[01:51:29.120 --> 01:51:30.200]  And here's all the reasons.
[01:51:30.200 --> 01:51:33.360]  This guy told you every single reason it's wrong.
[01:51:33.360 --> 01:51:37.960]  And you ignored it anyway to maintain the status quo of an illegitimate opinion.
[01:51:37.960 --> 01:51:42.960]  And that's what we're going to have to force them to deal with.
[01:51:42.960 --> 01:51:49.360]  And that's what we're dealing with nowadays.
[01:51:49.360 --> 01:51:50.360]  It is.
[01:51:50.360 --> 01:51:53.520]  And that's why I told the first caller that I'm still stuck between a rock and a hard
[01:51:53.520 --> 01:51:58.040]  place trying to figure out whether we should keep trying to use the system as it exists
[01:51:58.040 --> 01:52:03.240]  or just start yanking them out of their beds at night and string them up from a tree.
[01:52:03.240 --> 01:52:05.480]  Because that's what they deserve.
[01:52:05.480 --> 01:52:11.200]  Well, a court case first.
[01:52:11.200 --> 01:52:18.240]  Well, it's like I tell people about trying to fix something from the inside.
[01:52:18.240 --> 01:52:27.800]  I fail to see how you can use a broken machine to repair itself.
[01:52:27.800 --> 01:52:35.760]  The viability of that fix escapes me.
[01:52:35.760 --> 01:52:38.400]  Okay.
[01:52:38.400 --> 01:52:39.400]  Well I'm going to break loose.
[01:52:39.400 --> 01:52:40.400]  I'm going to support you.
[01:52:40.400 --> 01:52:46.000]  I'm going to go to your site there and send you some money.
[01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:47.000]  Well, great.
[01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:48.000]  I appreciate that.
[01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:53.000]  And like I said, you can't donate to me directly on logosradionetwork.com.
[01:52:53.000 --> 01:52:59.200]  You have to go to the ruleoflawradio.com website and click on the little tab on the top left
[01:52:59.200 --> 01:53:03.800]  that says donations and then use the gold button under where it says make a donation
[01:53:03.800 --> 01:53:04.800]  to Eddie.
[01:53:04.800 --> 01:53:05.800]  Okay.
[01:53:05.800 --> 01:53:06.800]  Okay.
[01:53:06.800 --> 01:53:13.080]  And I appreciate you very much for doing so because like I say, where I'm at now, I had
[01:53:13.080 --> 01:53:17.040]  to relocate and the bills are much greater than they were.
[01:53:17.040 --> 01:53:20.000]  And that was not by my own choice.
[01:53:20.000 --> 01:53:21.000]  But I had to do it.
[01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:23.000]  I didn't have any way to avoid it.
[01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:26.240]  So now I'm here and now I got to deal with it.
[01:53:26.240 --> 01:53:28.880]  And Austin won't pay you.
[01:53:28.880 --> 01:53:29.880]  What's that?
[01:53:29.880 --> 01:53:35.080]  I say, and Austin won't give you the money they owe you on top of that.
[01:53:35.080 --> 01:53:38.640]  A lot of people won't give me the money they owe me on top of that.
[01:53:38.640 --> 01:53:43.840]  It ain't just Austin.
[01:53:43.840 --> 01:53:48.840]  But anyway, I appreciate it all the same and I appreciate you calling in and asking the
[01:53:48.840 --> 01:53:49.840]  questions.
[01:53:49.840 --> 01:53:50.840]  Thanks for that, everybody.
[01:53:50.840 --> 01:53:51.840]  All right.
[01:53:51.840 --> 01:53:52.840]  Thanks, sir.
[01:53:52.840 --> 01:53:53.840]  All right.
[01:53:53.840 --> 01:53:57.560]  Now, we've got less than five minutes left in the show.
[01:53:57.560 --> 01:54:03.400]  So I want to go back to Martin here real quick and I want to tell you some other stupid thing
[01:54:03.400 --> 01:54:07.240]  that the Dallas Court of Appeals put in this opinion.
[01:54:07.240 --> 01:54:13.240]  They actually said, although the legislature cannot delegate its inherent authority to
[01:54:13.240 --> 01:54:19.340]  pass a law, it can delegate the authority to make a fact-finding essential to the operation
[01:54:19.340 --> 01:54:24.000]  of law if the fact is one that the legislature cannot practically and efficiently determine.
[01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:29.280]  Well, what fact are you saying they're finding, Dallas Court of Appeals?
[01:54:29.280 --> 01:54:38.400]  What fact supersedes a constitutional delegation of power that the Constitution itself never
[01:54:38.400 --> 01:54:47.480]  delineated or authorized or is ambiguous about in any way?
[01:54:47.480 --> 01:54:54.840]  What possible fact could the legislature look at to say, oh, that provision of the Constitution
[01:54:54.840 --> 01:54:57.800]  does not mean what it actually says.
[01:54:57.800 --> 01:55:03.340]  It actually says we can do this, not that we can't.
[01:55:03.340 --> 01:55:06.880]  What fact would that be, you morons?
[01:55:06.880 --> 01:55:11.640]  Yes, I am going to beat you to death with your own words.
[01:55:11.640 --> 01:55:16.700]  I am going to beat you to death with your own opinion and all the other stupid idiotic
[01:55:16.700 --> 01:55:24.760]  opinions from all the other court of appeals that got it just as wrong as you did.
[01:55:24.760 --> 01:55:30.400]  All in an effort to keep the power of the state at a level it was never meant to be
[01:55:30.400 --> 01:55:35.400]  while diminishing the rights of the people in the process.
[01:55:35.400 --> 01:55:42.480]  That I will never, ever stop railing against, ever.
[01:55:42.480 --> 01:55:47.000]  I will still be doing this when I'm dead in my grave, I'll be railing against this.
[01:55:47.000 --> 01:55:49.100]  And you know why?
[01:55:49.100 --> 01:55:53.760]  Because there are other people out there that have taken what I have shown them to heart
[01:55:53.760 --> 01:55:59.200]  and they will continue the fight that I started.
[01:55:59.200 --> 01:56:05.820]  So I, in essence, will always be there making the effort to fix this problem, even if that
[01:56:05.820 --> 01:56:10.200]  eventually means hauling your butts out of bed and hanging you in the middle of the night
[01:56:10.200 --> 01:56:12.000]  for sedition.
[01:56:12.000 --> 01:56:17.360]  Because that's what you people truly deserve when you take it upon yourselves to rewrite
[01:56:17.360 --> 01:56:23.880]  the people's constitution to keep the power in your hands and out of ours.
[01:56:23.880 --> 01:56:28.440]  It's what every one of you deserves.
[01:56:28.440 --> 01:56:32.840]  And I can only pray to the good Lord above that at some point the people of Texas and
[01:56:32.840 --> 01:56:38.440]  every other state realizes this and takes you to task for it in a way you will not be
[01:56:38.440 --> 01:56:45.040]  able to stop and a way you will not be able to get away from.
[01:56:45.040 --> 01:56:51.520]  That ladies and gentlemen would be true justice.
[01:56:51.520 --> 01:56:57.520]  It wouldn't be this facade of justice that the system has concocted and put up to make
[01:56:57.520 --> 01:57:00.360]  itself look legitimate.
[01:57:00.360 --> 01:57:05.880]  Because that's all it's got is a facade.
[01:57:05.880 --> 01:57:08.560]  And we need to put a stop to it.
[01:57:08.560 --> 01:57:13.360]  Oh, I do wish, I do wish, I do wish.
[01:57:13.360 --> 01:57:15.580]  But again, that's why I do what I do.
[01:57:15.580 --> 01:57:16.700]  That's why I do this show.
[01:57:16.700 --> 01:57:18.400]  That's why I do my classes.
[01:57:18.400 --> 01:57:24.640]  That's why I help people as much as I can, as often as I can to do this and to challenge
[01:57:24.640 --> 01:57:27.080]  this and to make an effort with it.
[01:57:27.080 --> 01:57:28.760]  But people, I'm one guy.
[01:57:28.760 --> 01:57:30.920]  I am one guy.
[01:57:30.920 --> 01:57:31.960]  Okay?
[01:57:31.960 --> 01:57:33.880]  And I'm not going to be here forever.
[01:57:33.880 --> 01:57:38.880]  And I don't really want to be the one having to do this forever for everybody else.
[01:57:38.880 --> 01:57:44.240]  I would like someone to be able to pick up the torch and carry it as well.
[01:57:44.240 --> 01:57:48.560]  And I'm hoping people will go after this as hard as I went after this to learn it and
[01:57:48.560 --> 01:57:53.360]  understand it so that they can do that.
[01:57:53.360 --> 01:57:56.960]  Because that is what makes us self-governing.
[01:57:56.960 --> 01:58:04.040]  Without that, we have to be ruled over because we can't manage ourselves.
[01:58:04.040 --> 01:58:05.720]  We won't manage ourselves.
[01:58:05.720 --> 01:58:06.720]  We got to change it.
[01:58:06.720 --> 01:58:07.720]  All right, folks.
[01:58:07.720 --> 01:58:09.720]  I want to thank you for listening.
[01:58:09.720 --> 01:58:11.960]  I want to thank the callers that called in tonight.
[01:58:11.960 --> 01:58:13.920]  I want to thank everybody that's making donations.
[01:58:13.920 --> 01:58:20.000]  If you can, please, please, for the love of God, help support me financially in this,
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:21.960]  support the network financially in this.
[01:58:21.960 --> 01:58:25.240]  We cannot keep doing what we're doing if we can't pay the bills.
[01:58:25.240 --> 01:58:30.720]  And we can't pay the bills without you guys because this takes way too much time, effort,
[01:58:30.720 --> 01:58:36.000]  energy, equipment, and, of course, expenditures we wouldn't have to make if we weren't doing
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:37.920]  it to keep it going.
[01:58:37.920 --> 01:58:40.200]  So please help us out.
[01:58:40.200 --> 01:58:41.200]  Keep us live.
[01:58:41.200 --> 01:58:42.280]  Keep us on the air.
[01:58:42.280 --> 01:58:43.280]  Keep us going.
[01:58:43.280 --> 01:58:44.280]  Thank you all.
[01:58:44.280 --> 01:58:45.280]  Have a great week.
[01:58:45.280 --> 01:58:50.560]  Good night and God bless.
[01:58:50.560 --> 01:58:56.640]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.640 --> 01:58:57.840]  Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.840 --> 01:59:02.800]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:02.800 --> 01:59:08.480]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.480 --> 01:59:11.760]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.760 --> 01:59:20.760]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.760 --> 01:59:26.440]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:59:26.440 --> 01:59:30.300]  charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.300 --> 01:59:32.840]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.840 --> 01:59:41.200]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.200 --> 01:59:51.440]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.440 --> 01:59:52.440]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.440 --> 02:00:12.440]  You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.