[00:00.000 --> 00:05.440] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.440 --> 00:09.440] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.440 --> 00:10.920] Our liberty depends on it. [00:10.920 --> 00:14.840] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [00:14.840 --> 00:16.960] your First Amendment rights. [00:16.960 --> 00:18.560] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.560 --> 00:22.160] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.160 --> 00:26.920] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:26.920 --> 00:28.160] So protect your rights. [00:28.160 --> 00:31.920] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [00:31.920 --> 00:32.920] Privacy. [00:32.920 --> 00:34.680] It's worth hanging on to. [00:34.680 --> 00:38.960] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search [00:38.960 --> 00:42.520] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.520 --> 00:44.520] Start over with Startpage. [00:44.520 --> 00:45.520] Spar. [00:45.520 --> 00:47.800] It's what fighters do. [00:47.800 --> 00:50.840] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:50.840 --> 00:54.440] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:54.440 --> 00:56.520] S-P-A-R with an extra P. [00:56.520 --> 00:57.720] S for speech. [00:57.720 --> 01:03.080] P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion. [01:03.080 --> 01:07.000] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, [01:07.000 --> 01:10.440] assembly, and religion, but petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.440 --> 01:14.600] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.600 --> 01:18.120] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out [01:18.120 --> 01:20.720] the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:20.720 --> 01:22.720] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:22.720 --> 01:31.120] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.120 --> 01:34.800] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. [01:34.800 --> 01:38.240] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:38.240 --> 01:39.720] Our liberty depends on it. [01:39.720 --> 01:43.620] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:43.620 --> 01:46.760] one of your constitutional rights. [01:46.760 --> 01:48.360] Privacy is under attack. [01:48.360 --> 01:51.960] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:51.960 --> 01:56.720] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [01:56.720 --> 02:01.720] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.720 --> 02:04.480] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [02:04.480 --> 02:08.780] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [02:08.780 --> 02:12.320] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.320 --> 02:15.880] Start over with StartPage. [02:15.880 --> 02:20.240] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill [02:20.240 --> 02:22.320] of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:22.320 --> 02:26.880] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms [02:26.880 --> 02:30.680] that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:30.680 --> 02:31.680] Get it? [02:31.680 --> 02:33.960] Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? [02:33.960 --> 02:37.560] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well [02:37.560 --> 02:43.320] when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary [02:43.320 --> 02:47.440] government, one more safeguard against the tyranny, which now appears remote in America, [02:47.440 --> 02:50.520] but which historically has proved to always be possible. [02:50.520 --> 02:52.520] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [02:52.520 --> 03:22.360] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:23.080 --> 03:45.800] the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, [03:45.800 --> 04:03.640] one more safeguard against the tyranny, which now appears remote in America, but which [04:03.640 --> 04:23.480] now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which [04:23.480 --> 04:38.040] now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which [04:38.040 --> 04:54.600] now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which [04:54.600 --> 05:15.080] now appears remote in America, but which now appears remote in America, but which [05:15.080 --> 05:20.120] Everything you need to know about filing suits and did I ever find some interesting stuff in there? [05:21.040 --> 05:26.840] Well, do tell well, we do have a couple of first-time callers that already popped up on the board. So [05:27.640 --> 05:32.160] Just so you know, I don't know if you saw that but but tell what what did you discover? [05:32.720 --> 05:37.880] They filed a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction and I talked about this last night that [05:38.680 --> 05:41.560] It really wasn't a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction [05:41.560 --> 05:46.760] That it was actually a in personum jurisdiction [05:48.280 --> 05:55.360] Challenge well, I was going through the rules and such and I came across a page about motions and pleadings [05:56.480 --> 06:02.520] And a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction does not have to be verified [06:02.520 --> 06:10.520] But a challenge to in personum jurisdiction does [06:12.040 --> 06:14.040] They didn't verify it [06:14.200 --> 06:16.200] I got real busy today [06:16.760 --> 06:19.840] Actually, I can bring it up. I think I've got it somewhere [06:20.480 --> 06:25.280] if they didn't verify it and then I can go in with an argument saying that [06:25.280 --> 06:34.320] They if this wasn't a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction, it was in personum. If it's not an in personum [06:35.280 --> 06:40.600] Then there is no challenge to subject matter jurisdiction and ask the court to strike it [06:42.320 --> 06:44.920] If they do call it in personum [06:44.920 --> 06:54.920] Then I'll claim that it's not verified and not before the court and ask for a summary judgment [06:55.920 --> 06:57.920] Not only was it artfully planned [06:58.480 --> 07:00.480] not artfully planned [07:01.360 --> 07:03.360] They didn't read the rules your honor [07:05.000 --> 07:07.000] So that was great fun [07:08.440 --> 07:10.440] reading the rules [07:10.440 --> 07:16.160] Really helps knowing the law. We have all these people pushing all this patriot mythology [07:16.680 --> 07:23.400] All you got to do is read the code read the law and here I only read what they sent me [07:24.080 --> 07:28.640] The case law I'm using to hammer them with is what they sent me [07:30.680 --> 07:32.680] See I'm in Whitaker [07:32.680 --> 07:38.920] Oh, what did I put the answer to the suit? [07:42.760 --> 07:45.680] I'm looking in my files for their answer [07:47.000 --> 07:54.240] And I'm not seeing it. I may have to go back. Yeah, that's really true often. We will receive something from the other side and [07:55.320 --> 07:57.000] We didn't know where it was going to go [07:57.000 --> 08:04.240] But as soon as they respond we go and look up the the issue the whatever the case law the rule the whatever they referenced [08:04.240 --> 08:09.240] and sure enough that gives you your next step because they [08:09.880 --> 08:15.840] Did it wrong? They referenced it wrong. It wasn't on point. They misquoted it. They they are [08:16.480 --> 08:23.000] Trying to use and abuse a rule that doesn't really fit that way. It's amazing how they will hand you [08:23.000 --> 08:25.600] On a silver platter exactly what you need [08:26.240 --> 08:30.920] That's cussed lawyers here. I don't know. They're so arrogant and they're used to [08:31.720 --> 08:33.960] Having their own little fraternity [08:35.520 --> 08:41.440] This is the kind of theme one lawyer would in kind of objection one lawyer would never bring [08:41.960 --> 08:44.440] to another one because he wouldn't want to embarrass the lawyers [08:45.640 --> 08:48.320] So, you know, they would do this kind of on the sly [08:48.320 --> 08:52.360] Yeah. Well, I don't want to embarrass anybody either, but when they're coming after you [08:53.000 --> 08:55.000] and [08:56.000 --> 08:58.000] The gloves have to come off [08:58.680 --> 09:03.680] This is adversarial. We didn't get invited into this like a coming to a dinner party [09:04.440 --> 09:10.680] Yeah, exactly. And we're not going to come to court with these same lawyers again and again and again. So [09:12.040 --> 09:15.160] Foresighted chessboard. We don't have a relationship with them [09:15.160 --> 09:18.520] We don't need a relationship with them. So we don't care if we [09:19.240 --> 09:23.160] Embarrass them or annoy them. They're deal with it, bubba [09:24.520 --> 09:26.520] so [09:26.600 --> 09:32.760] Point is when the other side sends you a document and and I this is I'm doing this for dr [09:32.760 --> 09:36.440] Joe and this is what I told him. I want to see their answer [09:37.800 --> 09:40.560] Before I filed a second suit against the next judge [09:40.560 --> 09:45.320] I want to see their answer from this one because I'm hoping they'll give me some really cool stuff [09:47.520 --> 09:49.520] And they did [09:51.360 --> 09:54.800] They can't work gave me what I needed to beat him up with [09:58.320 --> 10:01.160] Almost down here to where that thing should be [10:01.720 --> 10:06.080] But anyway, I'll find it. Well, I'll talk to it later rather than hold everybody up [10:06.080 --> 10:10.800] We do have some a bunch of callers on the board and we have what look like some first-time callers [10:12.880 --> 10:15.760] My page again, yeah, we've got a [10:16.400 --> 10:19.840] 973 area code is the first first-time caller [10:20.560 --> 10:22.560] There it is. You're in nine seven three [10:23.920 --> 10:26.880] Give us a name and a state [10:30.320 --> 10:32.320] Hello 973 [10:32.320 --> 10:34.320] Hello 973 [10:36.400 --> 10:40.880] Robin yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Can you hear me? [10:41.680 --> 10:43.680] Barely Wow, barely [10:45.040 --> 10:49.520] Okay, we're gonna I'm gonna disconnect this blue tooth nonsense. Oh, yes [10:50.960 --> 10:55.680] Very good. Yeah, sometimes bluetooth ends up causing an issue in that regard [10:56.480 --> 10:59.520] Yeah, yeah, you can switch over it. That's wonderful [10:59.520 --> 11:02.560] I wanted to hear you guys as clearly as possible. Can you hear me? [11:03.360 --> 11:06.160] We can hear you a little better, but not great [11:07.040 --> 11:09.200] Okay, so you're robin and what state? [11:10.400 --> 11:12.400] in jersey [11:12.640 --> 11:15.520] New Jersey, New Jersey, New Jersey. Yeah [11:16.320 --> 11:17.840] All right [11:17.840 --> 11:19.840] Jersey with an au [11:20.560 --> 11:22.560] New Jersey [11:22.560 --> 11:25.840] An au new jersey [11:29.680 --> 11:32.720] Okay, what what do you have for us today [11:34.480 --> 11:41.520] I got so much but I know you got a lot of callers. Um, I got a work situation, but i'll try to get through that another time [11:42.000 --> 11:46.880] We have a uh, uh, my honey was uh got a ticket in the mail [11:47.440 --> 11:49.840] with a social security number on it [11:49.840 --> 11:54.800] And the prosecutor and this was from 2020 in covid. Apparently he was just [11:55.520 --> 12:00.160] Do you know cop just putting tickets on the call whatever because of the governor's mandate? [12:00.720 --> 12:06.000] So here we are too late. You're later. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Did you have a mask on your car? [12:11.200 --> 12:16.640] Exactly, not quite not quite. But anyway, she just received she didn't hear the cop [12:16.640 --> 12:20.560] Um, give any mandates or you know, give any warning that she was just out on the port [12:21.280 --> 12:26.480] And basically a couple months later got a ticket in the mail with her social security number on it [12:26.960 --> 12:32.160] I did research and found out a violation of crime basically for using personal information [12:32.800 --> 12:36.960] And i'm trying to make a long story short. We went to you know, we had a zoom trial [12:37.520 --> 12:42.640] And they kept going. We're like, let's you know, this needs to be dismissed and I recorded it [12:42.640 --> 12:47.680] So and then the cop, you know, the cop wasn't there, but he admitted that he wasn't there [12:48.160 --> 12:53.840] Placing tickets so he never saw her or spoke to her and then when I brought up to the prosecutor that [12:54.400 --> 13:00.160] You know using, you know personal information the prosecutor just said oh i'm surprised you didn't follow [13:00.240 --> 13:03.280] Complaints to the governor. So she knew that was an issue [13:03.920 --> 13:07.440] Yet we got to the judge and they still persisted with the case [13:07.440 --> 13:12.000] And then so, you know a couple of months later, then we got two days notice to [13:12.640 --> 13:18.640] To uh, that's the you know, return the trial where the cop is supposed to be there. Then I wrote up this nice pleading [13:19.360 --> 13:20.800] and um [13:20.800 --> 13:24.320] Randy, thank you. I used some of your one of your documents from ohio [13:24.800 --> 13:29.920] Because I I know you you played your eyes the stuff. I played your eyes [13:30.800 --> 13:34.000] Dude, and I made a mistake. I was up. You said I played the [13:34.000 --> 13:37.060] Dude, and I made a mistake. I was up. You said I played the [13:41.840 --> 13:43.840] Yes, I did thank you very much [13:48.000 --> 13:54.080] Yeah, but the thing is man I was up all night last night and then or night before last and um [13:54.720 --> 14:00.320] I left ohio in one of the words by mistake. That was like one of the few mistakes I did. So thanks randy [14:00.320 --> 14:04.800] That mistake that kind of thing is nuns co-tunk [14:06.160 --> 14:11.680] Nuns co-tunk cares no harm is found minor error that doesn't cause any trouble [14:12.400 --> 14:14.400] Like a typo, whatever [14:14.400 --> 14:20.160] And I like to do stuff like that to let them know that this is not something I just made up [14:20.960 --> 14:26.880] It's something that's out there on the internet that everybody can use to pound you with we don't have to write our own pleadings [14:26.880 --> 14:28.880] Yes [14:30.080 --> 14:31.440] That's nice [14:31.440 --> 14:36.800] So I want to um be quick because I know you're so busy and I really appreciate you guys. Well, we want to uh [14:37.760 --> 14:39.440] Keep the damages [14:39.440 --> 14:41.840] And i'm not sure like how much [14:42.560 --> 14:46.000] It should be okay. Here's what you have to find [14:47.280 --> 14:49.120] You have to find [14:49.120 --> 14:50.620] where they [14:50.620 --> 14:53.380] violated an administrative duty [14:53.380 --> 15:01.720] And what an administrative duty is is a duty over which they have no discretion [15:03.700 --> 15:07.460] Or they're required to do a specific thing and they don't do that thing [15:10.020 --> 15:12.020] That's how you get past immunity [15:13.780 --> 15:15.300] Okay [15:15.300 --> 15:17.780] As opposed to something that they can do [15:19.300 --> 15:21.300] At their discretion [15:21.300 --> 15:26.580] It has to be something where they're commanded. This is what you must do and they don't have any wiggle room [15:27.300 --> 15:31.300] They are commanded to redact the social security number [15:32.020 --> 15:34.020] from all of their records [15:35.700 --> 15:37.860] This was 10 years ago when they did this [15:41.060 --> 15:46.340] Check that out. They publicized your social security number [15:46.340 --> 15:48.340] Remember [15:49.700 --> 15:51.860] Brett do you remember the statute that [15:53.380 --> 15:59.060] They passed to order him to do that. I was in that in years when I filed the [16:00.660 --> 16:02.900] habeas corpus in conroe, texas [16:04.660 --> 16:06.660] That was in 2008 [16:08.180 --> 16:14.980] And I went into the courtroom and everybody was running around under the courthouse was running around like a chicken with their heads cut off [16:14.980 --> 16:18.900] Pulling all of these records and redacting all the social security numbers [16:20.740 --> 16:27.140] So that that is a big ups now if they can ask you for your social security number [16:28.500 --> 16:33.140] But if you don't give it to them and they demand it as I understand that's a felony [16:33.140 --> 16:42.500] So it may be a crime for them to publish your social security number [16:45.700 --> 16:50.180] And that mail fraud put on the mail and you know send the ticket in the mail [16:50.580 --> 16:54.900] With your social security number not having ever seen her isn't that mail fraud and [16:55.620 --> 16:59.700] That's what i'm well, you know, there's a lot of things that are that are going wrong with them [16:59.700 --> 17:04.740] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls letters or even lawsuits? [17:05.300 --> 17:12.740] Stop debt collectors now with the michael mirrors proven method michael mirrors has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors [17:12.820 --> 17:14.580] And now you can win too [17:14.580 --> 17:20.500] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain english on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes [17:20.740 --> 17:27.860] What to do when contacted by phones mail or court summons how to answer letters and phone calls how to get debt collectors out [17:27.860 --> 17:33.540] Of your credit report how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away [17:33.780 --> 17:40.820] The michael mirrors proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors personal consultation is available as well [17:41.060 --> 17:48.900] For more information, please visit rule of law radio.com and click on the blue michael mirrors banner or email michael mirrors at yahu.com [17:49.460 --> 17:51.460] That's rule of law radio.com [17:51.780 --> 17:57.080] Or email m i c h a e l m i r r a f at yahu.com [17:57.080 --> 17:59.640] To learn how to stop debt collectors now [18:01.720 --> 18:05.720] Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar in today's america [18:05.720 --> 18:09.480] We live in us against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free society [18:09.560 --> 18:12.120] Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights [18:12.440 --> 18:17.640] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly [18:17.640 --> 18:24.920] The right to due process of law traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process [18:24.920 --> 18:30.760] The former sheriff's deputy eddie craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [18:30.760 --> 18:34.680] That will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law [18:35.000 --> 18:40.840] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to rule of law radio.com and ordering your copy today by ordering [18:40.840 --> 18:46.200] Now you'll receive a copy of eddie's book the texas transportation code the law versus the lie video and audio of the original [18:46.500 --> 18:52.520] 2009 seminar hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material [18:52.520 --> 18:58.300] From rule of law radio.com order your copy today and together. We can have the free society. We all want and deserve [18:58.300 --> 19:19.100] You are listening to the logos radio network logos radio network.com [19:28.860 --> 19:30.860] Yeah [19:38.380 --> 19:43.420] It's standing like it's out of control on the edge of a hole inside a deep dark [19:43.420 --> 19:48.380] No, i'm always on the lookout for something to soothe my soul [19:48.380 --> 19:56.380] Oh [20:10.140 --> 20:12.620] Okay, we are back this is the rule of law radio [20:12.620 --> 20:19.420] Radio randy keltron i'm brett fountain and we're talking with robin in new jersey, or he just said jersey [20:20.060 --> 20:23.020] so robin just right before the sponsors of [20:23.980 --> 20:28.380] you were talking about some of the things that these people have done wrong and [20:29.180 --> 20:34.780] it occurs to me that uh one thing that could be helpful to clarify here is that [20:35.820 --> 20:37.820] in this situation [20:37.820 --> 20:44.360] Um, while it, of course, stands out to you when you see the things that they've done [20:44.360 --> 20:47.400] wrong, put that off to the side. [20:47.400 --> 20:48.920] Two wrongs don't make a right. [20:48.920 --> 20:52.920] You can't get your, your wife, I think, did you say, was it your wife? [20:52.920 --> 20:53.920] Yeah. [20:53.920 --> 20:54.920] Yeah. [20:54.920 --> 21:01.920] You can't get her off the hook just by raising the issue about things that they've done wrong. [21:01.920 --> 21:02.920] They're crimes. [21:02.920 --> 21:05.360] They're absolutely, you mail fraud, you're right. [21:05.360 --> 21:13.340] And put those in a parallel, you know, a side track that's going to go in a different track. [21:13.340 --> 21:14.620] You've got to get her off the hook. [21:14.620 --> 21:20.480] And my suggestion is that you even prioritize getting her off the hook. [21:20.480 --> 21:25.280] And then you're fighting the fight that you want to have without anything hanging over [21:25.280 --> 21:26.280] her head. [21:26.280 --> 21:27.280] And it feels a lot different. [21:27.280 --> 21:28.280] I'll tell you. [21:28.280 --> 21:29.280] Exactly. [21:29.280 --> 21:32.480] Brett, can I comment on that? [21:32.480 --> 21:33.480] Yeah. [21:33.480 --> 21:37.400] Oh, thank you so much, and I appreciate you too, so much, Lundu. [21:37.400 --> 21:42.600] I'm in the telegram group, but we did, they acquitted the, you know, the document that [21:42.600 --> 21:47.800] I sent to them and she was armed and ready and I had to go to work, but she was ready. [21:47.800 --> 21:50.720] But excuse me, they dismissed the case yesterday. [21:50.720 --> 21:51.720] Sweet. [21:51.720 --> 21:58.360] So the reason I'm, yeah, the reason I'm calling it now, post the case, can we sue for damages? [21:58.360 --> 22:00.160] I just wanted your opinion on that. [22:00.160 --> 22:02.560] Oh, of course you can. [22:02.560 --> 22:07.760] You've got, you've got criminal, you've got civil, the civil is where you're going to [22:07.760 --> 22:08.760] get the money. [22:08.760 --> 22:10.480] So sue for damages is civil. [22:10.480 --> 22:14.940] So you don't really bring up mail fraud in that category. [22:14.940 --> 22:21.160] You could ding them for mail fraud by putting a criminal complaint in the hopper, but the [22:21.160 --> 22:23.580] civil is where you're going to get the money. [22:23.580 --> 22:30.400] So there is a kind of a crossover or a blend. [22:30.400 --> 22:36.200] You've probably, if you're on telegram, you've probably seen some chatter about title 42 [22:36.200 --> 22:45.120] US code section 1983, which is where you, you point out that crimes were committed by [22:45.120 --> 22:50.200] a state actor to deprive you of federally protected rights. [22:50.200 --> 22:51.440] Right. [22:51.440 --> 22:58.640] So you point out what is the federally protected right that got deprived and then you could [22:58.640 --> 23:05.960] bring up something like whatever the crimes were that the person did was a state actor. [23:05.960 --> 23:08.440] They did this under color of law. [23:08.440 --> 23:09.440] And here are the facts. [23:09.440 --> 23:17.240] You bring it up like that, but yeah, you can definitely, I'm congratulations. [23:17.240 --> 23:21.680] You got, you got that thing. [23:21.680 --> 23:22.680] You're out from under it. [23:22.680 --> 23:23.680] That's, that's wonderful. [23:23.680 --> 23:24.680] Yeah. [23:24.680 --> 23:30.160] Thank you was all using the rule of law and just reading, you know, just spending just [23:30.160 --> 23:31.160] night after night. [23:31.160 --> 23:34.120] Randy says, man, just read the codes, just read it. [23:34.120 --> 23:36.640] There's a lot of white space. [23:36.640 --> 23:40.240] And every time I read it, I find something crazy. [23:40.240 --> 23:43.720] Every time I read it, it's just, it becomes an obsession. [23:43.720 --> 23:48.560] Anybody listening to this, man, once you read the code, you get, it's just amazing what [23:48.560 --> 23:49.560] they're violating. [23:49.560 --> 23:54.960] So thank you guys, Randy, but thank you so much. [23:54.960 --> 23:55.960] Yes. [23:55.960 --> 23:56.960] Wonderful. [23:56.960 --> 24:02.440] Randy, did you find that, that piece you were looking for? [24:02.440 --> 24:11.600] No, I'm, it lists what they can require disclosure for, but I'm not finding the statute that [24:11.600 --> 24:17.280] makes it a crime to disclose someone's social security number. [24:17.280 --> 24:27.240] I have a Jersey statute, 39 colon 2-3.5. [24:27.240 --> 24:32.520] And that says a violation fourth degree crime, a person who knowingly obtains or discloses [24:32.520 --> 24:37.600] personal information from a motor vehicle record for any use not permitted under section [24:37.600 --> 24:44.320] two of P, I don't know how to read it, is guilty of a crime of fourth degree. [24:44.320 --> 24:48.760] And then the next one goes and said that there's a liability for that action and specifically [24:48.760 --> 24:54.960] section, it's title 39 motor vehicles and traffic regulation of New Jersey, section [24:54.960 --> 25:01.840] 39, colon 2-3, and this one is dot six, and there's a liability for civil action. [25:01.840 --> 25:07.320] A person who knowingly obtains discloses or uses personal information from a motor vehicle [25:07.320 --> 25:12.400] record for a purpose not committed, shall be liable to the individual whom the information [25:12.400 --> 25:16.680] pertains, who may bring full civil action in the superior court. [25:16.680 --> 25:17.680] And it says- [25:17.680 --> 25:24.040] So that grants you a statutory cause of action. [25:24.040 --> 25:25.040] Perfect. [25:25.040 --> 25:26.040] Wonderful. [25:26.040 --> 25:27.040] Perfect. [25:27.040 --> 25:33.640] And is this something like, is this agreeable, because we're in here arguing about, I'm thinking [25:33.640 --> 25:39.520] you should ask the 20, like a few thousand dollars, and she's like, no, I've been worried [25:39.520 --> 25:40.520] since 2020. [25:40.520 --> 25:46.760] So can part of the suffering or damages be caused because the ticket originated in 2020 [25:46.760 --> 25:50.760] and it's still going? [25:50.760 --> 25:54.280] That would look at your speedy trial right. [25:54.280 --> 25:58.480] Now here's how it works in Texas. [25:58.480 --> 26:05.280] In Texas, they passed the Speedy Trial Act, 32, what was it, 32, not 3202. [26:05.280 --> 26:06.280] 3201. [26:06.280 --> 26:15.360] 32, I thought it was 3202, they changed the numbering recently, but it used to be 3202. [26:15.360 --> 26:23.960] And the courts overruled it because they said the title was deceptive and some other minor [26:23.960 --> 26:26.960] little nitpicking issue. [26:26.960 --> 26:37.120] They didn't say anything about the time limits indicated by the legislature in their preface [26:37.120 --> 26:39.760] to the bill. [26:39.760 --> 26:47.560] In the bill, in the preface to the bill, the legislature indicated that for a Class C misdemeanor, [26:47.560 --> 26:57.560] that the state had 30 days to prosecute, beyond that was presumed to be excessive, 60 days [26:57.560 --> 27:03.320] for Class B, 90 for Class A, and 124 felony. [27:03.320 --> 27:10.400] Now they overturned the act, but they didn't overturn the constitutional right and the [27:10.400 --> 27:18.640] declaration of the legislature as to what is timely was not addressed or overturned. [27:18.640 --> 27:25.440] So I wrote up a brief for Texas that while the act was overturned, the constitutional [27:25.440 --> 27:28.000] right was not. [27:28.000 --> 27:38.200] Look at New Jersey, what, do you have any New Jersey statute representing the constitutional [27:38.200 --> 27:41.760] provision, a quick explanation of how this works. [27:41.760 --> 27:46.400] We had a guy call in once and said, he brought up the constitution and the judge said, don't [27:46.400 --> 27:49.280] bring the constitution into my court. [27:49.280 --> 27:51.200] The guy was incensed. [27:51.200 --> 27:53.720] The judge was right. [27:53.720 --> 27:57.240] The constitution doesn't grant you anything. [27:57.240 --> 28:03.560] It simply forbids a public official from doing certain things. [28:03.560 --> 28:11.640] And for every constitutional provision, there is a state statute representing that right [28:11.640 --> 28:15.040] or that duty on the part of public officials. [28:15.040 --> 28:21.000] So when you come into court, don't bring the constitution, bring the corresponding statute. [28:21.000 --> 28:25.840] To your knowledge, do you have a speedy trial act in New Jersey? [28:25.840 --> 28:28.640] I'm not sure. [28:28.640 --> 28:36.360] I just read that one of the canons of the rules of professional conduct is they're supposed [28:36.360 --> 28:39.120] to support a speedy trial. [28:39.120 --> 28:40.960] And that's one of the things that I wrote. [28:40.960 --> 28:47.320] Once you knew that there was no jurisdiction, why would you have set another court date? [28:47.320 --> 28:51.040] So I don't know if that's what I was looking for. [28:51.040 --> 28:53.840] So you bar grievance for that? [28:53.840 --> 28:56.680] You know what, Brett, I have your bar grievance document and I will. [28:56.680 --> 28:58.840] I've just been looking for that all day. [28:58.840 --> 29:04.920] And I'm really not sure if I should be going through, if there's a court document. [29:04.920 --> 29:05.920] I'm not sure, man. [29:05.920 --> 29:09.720] I've got to go over your document again because I'm not really sure exactly where to start [29:09.720 --> 29:10.720] with bar grievance. [29:10.720 --> 29:17.120] Am I going to the bar association website or is this the local? [29:17.120 --> 29:24.120] Generally, the state bar association will have a grievance form on their website. [29:24.120 --> 29:35.480] Let me reference you to the New Jersey's Beady Trial Act, Title 2A, Section 163-5, speedy [29:35.480 --> 29:36.480] trials. [29:36.480 --> 29:43.400] In all criminal cases involving a child victim, what is that? [29:43.400 --> 29:52.720] Well, you might take a look at Rule 3-25-4 that says that's a speedy trial rule of criminal [29:52.720 --> 29:55.720] procedure, 3-25-4. [29:55.720 --> 30:06.320] It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively [30:06.320 --> 30:07.320] affected our health? [30:07.320 --> 30:11.480] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings about how [30:11.480 --> 30:15.780] cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry. [30:15.780 --> 30:17.360] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.360 --> 30:20.960] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:20.960 --> 30:25.760] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:25.760 --> 30:30.760] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:30.760 --> 30:33.520] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.520 --> 30:37.800] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search [30:37.800 --> 30:41.360] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. [30:41.360 --> 30:45.120] Start over with Startpage. [30:45.120 --> 30:49.360] Cell phones emit radio frequency energy, it's a fact, but whether it's dangerous to have [30:49.360 --> 30:52.720] a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head has been disputed. [30:52.720 --> 30:57.200] Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns. [30:57.200 --> 31:01.680] Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones [31:01.680 --> 31:02.680] affect brain chemistry. [31:02.680 --> 31:08.300] A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest [31:08.300 --> 31:12.000] to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on. [31:12.000 --> 31:15.880] While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any [31:15.880 --> 31:16.880] chances. [31:16.880 --> 31:20.320] I always keep the phone far from my body and I use a corded headset. [31:20.320 --> 31:30.640] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:30.640 --> 31:31.640] I lost my son. [31:31.640 --> 31:32.640] My nephew. [31:32.640 --> 31:33.640] My uncle. [31:33.640 --> 31:34.640] My son. [31:34.640 --> 31:35.640] On September 11th, 2001. [31:35.640 --> 31:38.920] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th. [31:38.920 --> 31:42.920] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper was not hit by a plane. [31:42.920 --> 31:48.880] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, over 1,200 architects [31:48.880 --> 31:52.640] and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story. [31:52.640 --> 31:55.720] Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. [31:55.720 --> 31:57.960] Go to buildingwhat.org. [31:57.960 --> 32:01.840] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [32:01.840 --> 32:06.120] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [32:06.120 --> 32:07.120] Word? [32:07.120 --> 32:11.880] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time [32:11.880 --> 32:17.160] for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy [32:17.160 --> 32:18.160] 2.15. [32:18.160 --> 32:23.320] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly [32:23.320 --> 32:25.720] dividing the word of truth. [32:25.720 --> 32:29.700] Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse [32:29.700 --> 32:33.000] by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [32:33.000 --> 32:37.640] Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [32:37.640 --> 32:40.040] and Christian character development. [32:40.040 --> 32:44.560] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [32:44.560 --> 32:48.920] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness [32:48.920 --> 32:50.560] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [32:50.560 --> 32:57.800] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and [32:57.800 --> 33:00.240] motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [33:00.240 --> 33:10.240] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com. [33:30.240 --> 33:58.360] Okay. [33:58.360 --> 34:03.440] We are back, Brenda Kelton and Brett Fountain with Logos Radio, and we're talking to Robin [34:03.440 --> 34:04.440] in New Jersey. [34:04.440 --> 34:18.280] That's Joy-Z with a U, and I'm looking through some Brett Fountain, 3 colon, I'm sorry, I'm [34:18.280 --> 34:21.400] sorry, isn't that something? [34:21.400 --> 34:23.120] I'm there, looking at it now. [34:23.120 --> 34:33.240] New Jersey Court, rule 3, colon 25, and it says that if you've been arrested or indicted [34:33.240 --> 34:39.960] and you can't make bail, they can, if it's an indictment, they can only hold you for [34:39.960 --> 34:42.360] six months and a half to release you. [34:42.360 --> 34:48.720] I didn't finish all of it, but everyone I saw went to how long they could hold you in [34:48.720 --> 34:56.600] jail, but didn't say anything about them getting you to a prosecution. [34:56.600 --> 35:01.400] So if we can't, this is the only one we've found so far, but if we can't find one that [35:01.400 --> 35:06.480] guarantees you the right to prosecution within a given time, you can always fall back to [35:06.480 --> 35:07.480] the Constitution. [35:07.480 --> 35:14.080] I see some people talking here about a rule 600 this, rule 600 that, and I'm looking for [35:14.080 --> 35:17.680] a rule 600 to actually go read it. [35:17.680 --> 35:23.160] That seems like that might be the one you're talking about. [35:23.160 --> 35:29.200] One thing that's always nice to do is to bring a constitutional challenge. [35:29.200 --> 35:35.240] I always, in a case, look first for a constitutional challenge. [35:35.240 --> 35:42.560] You don't have to have a challenge that says that the statute itself is unconstitutional. [35:42.560 --> 35:51.080] Say that the application of the statute in this particular circumstance would render [35:51.080 --> 36:00.280] the statute unconstitutional, or you claim that by not bringing you to trial within a [36:00.280 --> 36:05.760] certain amount of time causes an unconstitutional denial of a speedy trial. [36:05.760 --> 36:10.640] If you don't have anything in New Jersey, then we look at surrounding states who do [36:10.640 --> 36:19.120] have specific deadlines and use those, or better yet, go to federal standards. [36:19.120 --> 36:24.240] Brett read the Speedy Trial Act out of the Constitution in New Jersey, and it read exactly [36:24.240 --> 36:29.840] the same out of the Constitution in Texas, and that's because they both read exactly [36:29.840 --> 36:35.920] the same as the federal Constitution, so you should be able to find federal case law on [36:35.920 --> 36:41.640] speedy trial and use that. [36:41.640 --> 36:47.360] When you bring a constitutional issue, they're going to want that to go away. [36:47.360 --> 36:58.120] They don't want to risk getting a bad ruling on them, so if you sue them, you want to find [36:58.120 --> 37:01.200] a constitutional challenge, because that tells them it's going to cost them a lot of money [37:01.200 --> 37:02.520] to fight you. [37:02.520 --> 37:07.120] That's what I did in Victoria County. [37:07.120 --> 37:17.000] Figured out when I read it, 1509 finally understood what I was reading, 15.09 says, when a complaint [37:17.000 --> 37:23.160] is forwarded to a magistrate, the magistrate shall issue a warrant for threat. [37:23.160 --> 37:27.680] That's an administrative duty, that's what I spoke to earlier, and an administrative [37:27.680 --> 37:34.160] duty, they've got a case law that says they don't have any immunity from a violation of [37:34.160 --> 37:36.480] an administrative duty. [37:36.480 --> 37:41.880] That's the kind of things you want to look for, and once I filed it, now they've got [37:41.880 --> 37:48.880] to look at this and say, what if this guy gets this to the Supreme and they rule in [37:48.880 --> 37:52.360] his favor? [37:52.360 --> 37:57.960] They are not going to want that to happen, so they write you a check. [37:57.960 --> 38:01.040] At the end of the day, it's all about the money. [38:01.040 --> 38:04.240] Now, I'm not doing this for the money, I've been doing this for 30 years and never made [38:04.240 --> 38:11.240] any money at it, but I hadn't went after them this way, and it's become clear this is the [38:11.240 --> 38:13.480] only way we're going to beat them. [38:13.480 --> 38:19.960] We start getting in their pockets, like the guy in Colorado Springs who went to a police [38:19.960 --> 38:23.880] department, he's taking pictures, and they arrested him and held him for 24 hours and [38:23.880 --> 38:25.360] released him. [38:25.360 --> 38:31.200] He filed, I think, a $40,000 lawsuit and they wrote him a check. [38:31.200 --> 38:39.480] Two guys in Ohio, two black guys, bought this house at auction, and it's in a white neighborhood, [38:39.480 --> 38:42.680] and they were having trouble, you know, they got the key in that little lock box, they've [38:42.680 --> 38:47.440] got a little lock box that hangs on the doorknob and you put in the combination, get the key [38:47.440 --> 38:48.720] out and then you can unlock it. [38:48.720 --> 38:51.080] Well, they're having trouble getting the combination to work. [38:51.080 --> 38:55.200] The guy across the street is a retired cop, and he sees these two black guys in a white [38:55.200 --> 39:00.880] neighborhood out there fooling with the lock, it took them quite a while to get in the house [39:00.880 --> 39:05.680] and he thinks they're breaking in, and that wasn't unreasonable, so he called the police. [39:05.680 --> 39:10.600] The police come out and pulled him out, and one of the black guys got pre-PO'd at him, [39:10.600 --> 39:14.360] so they cuffed both of them and they apologized to him, said, we just have to do this for [39:14.360 --> 39:15.360] our safety. [39:15.360 --> 39:21.880] The police were really professional, and then they found out the guys really belonged there, [39:21.880 --> 39:27.680] that they did buy the house, everything's okay, they apologized to him, and left. [39:27.680 --> 39:29.960] They sued him. [39:29.960 --> 39:37.120] The city settled, it was in Cincinnati, settled for $120,000 or $160,000, some outrageous [39:37.120 --> 39:39.880] amount. [39:39.880 --> 39:50.040] They settled, because it would cost them more to fight the case, than they could win, more [39:50.040 --> 39:56.640] than $160, it cost them more than that just to fight the case, so even if they won, they [39:56.640 --> 39:57.640] lost. [39:57.640 --> 40:01.200] This is how we get them. [40:01.200 --> 40:06.560] We start digging in their pockets and start sucking money out of their budgets, now we [40:06.560 --> 40:10.240] got their attention. [40:10.240 --> 40:11.240] Does that make sense, Robin? [40:11.240 --> 40:12.240] Yes, sir. [40:12.240 --> 40:17.520] Thank you so much, and start with the bar grievance, and then go through, fill out their [40:17.520 --> 40:23.400] forms, their complaint forms, right, on the court website, I don't, that's how it gets [40:23.400 --> 40:24.400] started, correct? [40:24.400 --> 40:30.400] Yeah, generally, they will have a site that you can go in and fill in the complaint and [40:30.400 --> 40:35.040] just send it from there, Texas has that. [40:35.040 --> 40:36.120] I don't use it. [40:36.120 --> 40:43.320] I've downloaded their complaint form and made one in Word, and the last one I made up is [40:43.320 --> 40:52.760] in PDF format, fill in the blank PDF, but that's because when I do this, the last time [40:52.760 --> 41:00.400] I did it, I pulled 45 records of arrests out of the county that I live in, and 35 of them [41:00.400 --> 41:02.880] had lawyers. [41:02.880 --> 41:10.280] So I built a criminal complaint against the officer, first degree felony aggravated assault [41:10.280 --> 41:18.120] charge against the officer for arresting the guy and taking him to jail, a T-Cold complaint, [41:18.120 --> 41:23.840] Texas Commission on Law Enforcement, most states call it POST, police officer certification [41:23.840 --> 41:29.000] training, a T-Cold complaint, professional conduct complaint, a bar grievance against [41:29.000 --> 41:34.280] the lawyer, a whole bunch of stuff, and I put them in one document and put merge fields [41:34.280 --> 41:43.360] in them and merged out a whole stack of documents for all 45 of these, just boom, spit them [41:43.360 --> 41:45.880] right out and mailed them all. [41:45.880 --> 41:49.280] That was so much fun. [41:49.280 --> 41:56.040] So I'm trying to build documents this way in kind of a generic format, so anybody can [41:56.040 --> 42:01.120] just fill them in, and look, I kind of got off point, but look on their website, they'll [42:01.120 --> 42:13.400] have one, and if you have some still in HTML or Word, you can build one on your own platform [42:13.400 --> 42:16.680] so you can mail merge into it. [42:16.680 --> 42:22.760] If you're doing a lot of attorneys, like you've got a law firm with 50 attorneys, you might [42:22.760 --> 42:27.360] want to bargrieve all of them, so you've got to take a list of their names and merge it [42:27.360 --> 42:29.360] right into the documents. [42:29.360 --> 42:37.360] Anyway, point is, hammer them big time. [42:37.360 --> 42:41.520] Russell Mortland's in a bankruptcy. [42:41.520 --> 42:46.960] He filed three bar grievances against his lawyer, never had to worry about it, and then [42:46.960 --> 42:54.400] halfway through the bankruptcy, this law firm disappeared, and another one showed up. [42:54.400 --> 43:02.120] At the end of the bankruptcy, this original law firm, this original lawyer, complained [43:02.120 --> 43:07.680] to the court that Mr. Mortland filed three bar grievances against me, and the next year [43:07.680 --> 43:10.860] our law firm couldn't get malpractice insurance. [43:10.860 --> 43:19.560] We had to close the law firm, and we opened it under another name. [43:19.560 --> 43:26.560] Russell's comment was, wah, wah, wah. [43:26.560 --> 43:27.760] I like Russell. [43:27.760 --> 43:30.520] He was such a grumpy old cuss. [43:30.520 --> 43:36.200] But anyway, they are really powerful, and you start doing that to them, you're costing [43:36.200 --> 43:37.760] them a fortune. [43:37.760 --> 43:46.560] I've got someone I'm working with, Dan in Hayes County down in San Marcos, Texas, and [43:46.560 --> 43:53.640] he bargrieved his lawyer, but first the lawyer, he wouldn't pay him, he paid him part of it, [43:53.640 --> 44:00.760] and the lawyer did nothing, and refused to pay him anymore, and the lawyer filed a motion. [44:00.760 --> 44:05.360] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [44:05.360 --> 44:06.760] of nutrition. [44:06.760 --> 44:10.600] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all [44:10.600 --> 44:11.600] that. [44:11.600 --> 44:17.200] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [44:17.200 --> 44:22.560] In a world where natural fruits have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young [44:22.560 --> 44:25.760] Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [44:25.760 --> 44:30.640] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which [44:30.640 --> 44:31.760] we reject. [44:31.760 --> 44:37.000] We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with [44:37.000 --> 44:39.880] Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [44:39.880 --> 44:46.120] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [44:46.120 --> 44:47.760] quality radio. [44:47.760 --> 44:51.800] As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us. [44:51.800 --> 44:57.360] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [44:57.360 --> 44:59.320] increase your income. [44:59.320 --> 45:00.320] Order now. [45:00.320 --> 45:04.480] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:04.480 --> 45:11.280] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course [45:11.280 --> 45:14.400] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [45:14.400 --> 45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.280] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:23.280 --> 45:28.960] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [45:28.960 --> 45:34.920] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [45:34.920 --> 45:39.520] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the [45:39.520 --> 45:43.760] principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:43.760 --> 45:49.920] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:49.920 --> 45:52.240] pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.240 --> 45:56.720] Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner. [45:56.720 --> 46:00.480] We're called toll-free, 866-LAW-EASY. [46:26.720 --> 46:50.600] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain of Rule of Law Radio, we're talking about [46:50.600 --> 47:00.720] Robin in New Jersey, and Robin, to your knowledge, are there litigation guides for New Jersey? [47:00.720 --> 47:07.560] I don't know, I'm new to this, so I will find it. [47:07.560 --> 47:11.920] Okay, write that down in big letters. [47:11.920 --> 47:19.400] If you can't find one for New Jersey, go online and do a search for O'Connor's Civil Trials [47:19.400 --> 47:22.600] in Texas. [47:22.600 --> 47:34.160] O'Connor's does Texas, California, and federal, and read the first hundred pages. [47:34.160 --> 47:39.400] It may be slightly different in New Jersey, but it won't make that much difference. [47:39.400 --> 47:45.720] Litigation guides, O'Connor's is the best I've ever seen, and they publish these every [47:45.720 --> 47:49.040] two years. [47:49.040 --> 47:52.400] The lawyers always want to quote the latest law. [47:52.400 --> 47:57.200] Not much changes in these things from here to here, but when a lawyer files a pleading [47:57.200 --> 48:00.240] with the court, he wants all the latest law. [48:00.240 --> 48:05.800] When the new ones come out, the law firms buy all the new ones, and they push the old [48:05.800 --> 48:08.880] ones to the back of their closet. [48:08.880 --> 48:13.600] If you call a couple of law firms and ask them, what's the best litigation guide for [48:13.600 --> 48:20.600] New Jersey, most of them will tell you, and ask them, do you have any old ones around? [48:20.600 --> 48:25.600] Tell them you're homeschooling your kids and want to do a course on law. [48:25.600 --> 48:28.280] We had a woman out of Amarillo do that. [48:28.280 --> 48:38.360] The second law firm she called, the guy said, do you have a station wagon or a pickup truck? [48:38.360 --> 48:46.120] Eddie Craig got an 18-foot box truck full of law books this way, but you can go on eBay [48:46.120 --> 48:52.200] and look, I got this Texas Civil Trials for $6.97. [48:52.200 --> 48:58.520] It's a big book, it weighs a ton, it had to cost them more than that to ship it. [48:58.520 --> 49:01.560] They're generally like 200 bucks. [49:01.560 --> 49:05.080] Well, this one's a 2016 model. [49:05.080 --> 49:06.080] Who cares? [49:06.080 --> 49:07.080] We're pro-says. [49:07.080 --> 49:14.440] We don't quote the latest law, but you walk through the front of that thing and all this [49:14.440 --> 49:21.080] stuff, these documents these lawyers file, they don't make up all this stuff. [49:21.080 --> 49:26.960] You're going to have forms for New Jersey, and all the lawyers use the forms out of the [49:26.960 --> 49:29.760] litigation guide. [49:29.760 --> 49:36.920] That's because they want that judge to look at that document and see everything where [49:36.920 --> 49:41.120] he expects to see it and the format he expects to see it in. [49:41.120 --> 49:46.600] The standard case law, they want it exactly what the judge expects to see, so the judge [49:46.600 --> 49:53.280] can just go down it, go to the salient part that's particular to this motion. [49:53.280 --> 49:57.080] I wrote one up for a friend of mine, he was my civil go-to guy. [49:57.080 --> 50:02.960] He was in a foreclosure, and he needed a petition for emergency restraining order. [50:02.960 --> 50:07.400] He wrote one up and sent it to me, and he asked me what I thought, and I told him, it's [50:07.400 --> 50:08.400] a piece of crap, Ken. [50:08.400 --> 50:11.040] I think you can do better, you bet. [50:11.040 --> 50:15.840] So I sent him one, he went to court, the lawyers showed up, they didn't expect him to. [50:15.840 --> 50:21.800] They go in, the judge reads his pleading, gives him his emergency restraining order. [50:21.800 --> 50:28.320] They come out, and the lawyer said, Mr. Magnuson, are you an attorney? [50:28.320 --> 50:31.440] Oh, no, no, he said, but my brother is. [50:31.440 --> 50:32.720] Did you write this? [50:32.720 --> 50:35.760] He said, well, I had some help. [50:35.760 --> 50:40.920] The lawyer said, this is really good. [50:40.920 --> 50:45.840] And Ken told me that, and I'm thinking, what the heck? [50:45.840 --> 50:52.800] I took that right out of O'Connor's forms and filled in the blanks. [50:52.800 --> 50:55.960] I didn't tell Ken that right away. [50:55.960 --> 51:02.920] I wanted you to think I was really smart, but it took a while to dawn on me what happened. [51:02.920 --> 51:07.800] They give the young lawyers the pro se litigants because they're easy to handle, and this lawyer [51:07.800 --> 51:12.640] comes in and he looks at this restraining order motion, and he said, heck, that's exactly [51:12.640 --> 51:15.960] like the ones we produce. [51:15.960 --> 51:21.360] It didn't occur to him that he got it out of O'Connor's. [51:21.360 --> 51:27.300] That's the reason he got it signed, because the judge took a look at it, and whether he [51:27.300 --> 51:33.680] knew this was by a pro se or not, his brain said, this looks exactly like every other [51:33.680 --> 51:39.720] request, and he treated it like every other request. [51:39.720 --> 51:46.880] Whatever you do, do not put man on the land, your last name colon. [51:46.880 --> 51:50.000] Don't put any of that nonsense in there. [51:50.000 --> 51:55.640] Make it look like a lawyer wrote it, and if you find the litigation guide, it'll help [51:55.640 --> 51:56.640] you do that. [51:56.640 --> 52:00.760] Ninety percent of your work is already done. [52:00.760 --> 52:08.320] I found a case law I needed over what I started out with. [52:08.320 --> 52:15.000] This really subtle thing, the reason I realized that it was not a subject matter jurisdiction [52:15.000 --> 52:21.920] challenge but was an impersonal challenge is because I took his case law, and I opened [52:21.920 --> 52:29.760] it up, and I did a search in the case law for the reference he made to that case law. [52:29.760 --> 52:34.360] I used his verbiage, and boom, just dropped right down to the paragraph that he was referring [52:34.360 --> 52:35.360] to. [52:35.360 --> 52:42.800] In there, it said that the defendant filed this as a subject matter jurisdiction challenge, [52:42.800 --> 52:46.720] but he only argued in personam. [52:46.720 --> 52:49.360] I said, say what? [52:49.360 --> 52:52.480] When I read that, it clicked. [52:52.480 --> 52:54.040] That's exactly what they did. [52:54.040 --> 52:56.520] Yes, exactly what they did. [52:56.520 --> 52:59.320] They said that the judge has absolute immunity. [52:59.320 --> 53:04.000] Well, that doesn't go to subject matter. [53:04.000 --> 53:10.280] They didn't argue that this judge could not rule on this particular kind of issue. [53:10.280 --> 53:18.040] Now, if I'd have sued for $250,000, they could have said that the county court doesn't have [53:18.040 --> 53:20.160] subject matter jurisdiction. [53:20.160 --> 53:22.960] Only the district court would have subject matter jurisdiction. [53:22.960 --> 53:25.920] They didn't argue anything about jurisdiction. [53:25.920 --> 53:30.120] They only argued that the judge had immunity. [53:30.120 --> 53:31.120] That was impersonal. [53:31.120 --> 53:38.240] It was subtle, but I wouldn't have got it if I hadn't read their case law. [53:38.240 --> 53:43.920] And lawyers screw up the case law all the time. [53:43.920 --> 53:53.080] And looking up their case law, even if they cited the case in opposition to your issue, [53:53.080 --> 53:57.120] the case is a case on point. [53:57.120 --> 54:06.240] And when the courts rule on a specific legal point, they explain how they get to this point. [54:06.240 --> 54:11.360] They'll say, in this case, we rule this way, this one we rule this way, this one we rule [54:11.360 --> 54:12.360] this way. [54:12.360 --> 54:13.360] This is on one side of the issue. [54:13.360 --> 54:16.800] And on the other side of the issue, they'll give you the rulings they made. [54:16.800 --> 54:20.160] And this is a new issue in between these others. [54:20.160 --> 54:22.240] So now we're addressing this issue. [54:22.240 --> 54:25.880] So you've got the case law on both sides. [54:25.880 --> 54:30.960] When they give you all your case law on point, you start looking up those other cases and [54:30.960 --> 54:31.960] actually reading them. [54:31.960 --> 54:33.960] You don't have to read the whole case. [54:33.960 --> 54:36.560] But, Randy, tell me something. [54:36.560 --> 54:44.480] When you pull up a case that they have presented as if it were in their favor, and it turns [54:44.480 --> 54:48.600] out it's in your favor, and you highlight that to the court, don't you feel really bad [54:48.600 --> 54:51.200] about that, embarrassing the lawyer that way? [54:51.200 --> 54:52.200] Oh, I do. [54:52.200 --> 54:53.200] I do. [54:53.200 --> 54:55.200] I'm so ashamed of myself. [54:55.200 --> 55:00.560] Oh, bad Randy, bad Randy. [55:00.560 --> 55:05.160] I can't tell you, I really do enjoy legal research. [55:05.160 --> 55:11.520] After you've done it a little bit and it starts to make sense to you, especially when you're [55:11.520 --> 55:14.560] hammering a lawyer, lawyers are busy. [55:14.560 --> 55:20.080] They don't make money researching and writing pleadings. [55:20.080 --> 55:24.840] They make their money getting retainers. [55:24.840 --> 55:29.640] They get a retainer, and then they go to their file, and they pull out this standard motion [55:29.640 --> 55:36.280] they file, and they put your name where it goes, and they file it with the court. [55:36.280 --> 55:40.440] The lawyer on the other side goes to his file and pulls out his answer that he's used a [55:40.440 --> 55:46.960] hundred times, puts his client's name on it, and files a response to your motion. [55:46.960 --> 55:53.060] This is what Dr. Graves from Jurisdictionary calls the flurry of motions. [55:53.060 --> 56:00.240] What the lawyer wants to do is use these standard motions until he's used up your retainer. [56:00.240 --> 56:05.240] Then he's going to come back, and he's going to want another retainer, three to five times [56:05.240 --> 56:06.240] the original one. [56:06.240 --> 56:10.480] Oh, this is a lot more complex than I expected. [56:10.480 --> 56:12.480] Now he wants his huge retainer. [56:12.480 --> 56:19.520] Actually, he doesn't want that retainer, because if he gets that retainer, now he's going to [56:19.520 --> 56:27.120] have to do legal research, and he don't make near as much money doing legal research as [56:27.120 --> 56:33.440] he does getting retainers, so he wants to get your retainer, use up your retainer, dump [56:33.440 --> 56:37.200] you, and go to the next guy. [56:37.200 --> 56:47.040] Once we get that, the guy I'm helping in Hayes County in San Marcos, Texas, the lawyer charged [56:47.040 --> 56:51.160] him $3,500 and did nothing. [56:51.160 --> 56:56.040] When Dan refused to take a deal, the lawyer came to him and said, he's going to need another [56:56.040 --> 56:57.040] $15,000. [56:57.040 --> 57:05.120] Dan told him to go scratch, he wasn't paying him anything, and the guy filed a motion to [57:05.120 --> 57:06.120] withdraw. [57:06.120 --> 57:15.320] I was just going through the Texas civil trials, and before he can file a motion to withdraw, [57:15.320 --> 57:21.720] he has to get permission from his client, has to get agreement. [57:21.720 --> 57:27.600] It's right there in the rules, and he goes before the court, and I told Dan, tell him [57:27.600 --> 57:35.480] heck no, so he goes before the court, and the judge said, Mr. Trevino, do you agree [57:35.480 --> 57:36.480] to this? [57:36.480 --> 57:42.680] Dan said, heck no, he's under contract, I paid him to do his job, he hasn't done anything, [57:42.680 --> 57:49.440] I want him to do his job, and the judge said, Kelsey, you're going to have to handle this [57:49.440 --> 57:50.440] with your client. [57:50.440 --> 58:00.840] The reason he did that, the Sixth Amendment, the government cannot impair the obligations [58:00.840 --> 58:09.440] of contracts, if the judge allowed him to withdraw, then he gets to sue the judge personally. [58:09.440 --> 58:14.400] There's no way the judge is going to let him withdraw, but what happened was, they found [58:14.400 --> 58:21.320] another motion to withdraw, and he goes there, and this other lawyer shows up and said, well, [58:21.320 --> 58:25.760] your previous lawyer is no longer with the firm, he's only doing civil now, so I'm going [58:25.760 --> 58:26.760] to be your lawyer. [58:26.760 --> 58:27.760] Funny how that happens. [58:27.760 --> 58:35.560] Yeah, absolutely not, he doesn't get to go anywhere, the boy grieved this guy. [58:35.560 --> 58:41.840] Oh, that's a great card, hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue of La Radio, we'll be [58:41.840 --> 58:42.840] right back. [58:42.840 --> 58:45.920] I didn't fall off the cliff that time. [58:45.920 --> 58:47.720] Good job. [58:47.720 --> 58:54.640] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? [58:54.640 --> 58:59.800] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that [58:59.800 --> 59:01.160] can really help. [59:01.160 --> 59:05.480] The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available [59:05.480 --> 59:06.480] today. [59:06.480 --> 59:10.520] It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you [59:10.520 --> 59:13.600] to know God and to know the meaning of life. [59:13.600 --> 59:18.880] The free books are a three volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. [59:18.880 --> 59:23.140] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan [59:23.140 --> 59:28.080] of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church. [59:28.080 --> 59:33.080] To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian [59:33.080 --> 59:45.840] Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102, that's 888-551-0102, or visit [59:45.840 --> 01:00:02.240] us online at bfa.org. [01:00:02.240 --> 01:00:26.460] The [01:00:26.460 --> 01:00:31.700] Spanish, too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information [01:00:31.700 --> 01:00:36.620] to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is [01:00:36.620 --> 01:00:42.100] brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, [01:00:42.100 --> 01:00:46.620] and Bing. Start over with StartPage. [01:00:46.620 --> 01:00:50.520] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers and find [01:00:50.520 --> 01:00:55.260] a third party there. He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. [01:00:55.260 --> 01:00:59.420] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment [01:00:59.420 --> 01:01:04.260] was designed to prevent. It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, [01:01:04.260 --> 01:01:09.020] a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. Third party, Third Amendment, get [01:01:09.020 --> 01:01:13.340] it? So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell [01:01:13.340 --> 01:01:17.580] them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and re-read the Third Amendment. I'm [01:01:17.580 --> 01:01:31.980] Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:01:31.980 --> 01:01:36.740] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. They guarantee a specific [01:01:36.740 --> 01:01:41.420] freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine [01:01:41.420 --> 01:01:45.900] Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional [01:01:45.900 --> 01:02:15.020] rights. [01:02:16.380 --> 01:02:22.100] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass or a pair of x-ray goggles. [01:02:22.100 --> 01:02:26.580] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable [01:02:26.580 --> 01:02:31.780] search and seizure. Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it? Unfortunately, [01:02:31.780 --> 01:02:36.620] the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security. Keys in point, [01:02:36.620 --> 01:02:41.220] TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. When government employees demand [01:02:41.220 --> 01:02:45.860] a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional [01:02:45.860 --> 01:02:50.660] alarm bells. Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their [01:02:50.660 --> 01:02:55.620] googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and [01:02:55.620 --> 01:03:12.420] information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:03:26.420 --> 01:03:35.540] I won't pay for the war with my body. Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money. I won't [01:03:35.540 --> 01:03:42.980] pay for the fun with my body. That man's wicked and the logic's shoddy. Ain't gonna pay for [01:03:42.980 --> 01:03:49.940] the oil with my body. I won't pay for the boys with my money. Ain't gonna pay for the [01:03:49.940 --> 01:03:57.940] kids with my fight. Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with Alton Blue Love Radio. And Robin, [01:03:57.940 --> 01:04:02.980] I know I kind of used you to go to a subject I wanted to talk to. I do this all the time [01:04:02.980 --> 01:04:12.100] to my callers. But probably the best information I could give you and any of you is get the [01:04:12.100 --> 01:04:20.500] litigation guides. The litigation guides will have all the issues you can think of. Like [01:04:20.500 --> 01:04:26.820] in Texas, we've got O'Connor's causes of action. Whenever I'm looking to write a lawsuit, the [01:04:26.820 --> 01:04:32.340] first thing I do is get out O'Connor's causes of action. And they got in the index, it lists [01:04:32.340 --> 01:04:38.580] all the causes of action. Just read what they are. Am I still on breath? I don't hear myself [01:04:38.580 --> 01:04:46.420] by headset. Yeah, I hear you. Oh, okay. I hear you. Okay, my mixer is supposed to feed back [01:04:46.420 --> 01:04:50.980] sound into my headset and then all of a sudden the feedback stops. So I was afraid I'd lost [01:04:50.980 --> 01:04:58.260] everything. Okay. It's just your hearing aid probably went into wife mode. Oh, that's right. [01:04:58.260 --> 01:05:04.100] It probably could have. Oh, I shouldn't mention that. Oh, she gets excited. Where all my family's [01:05:04.100 --> 01:05:11.380] here. Her sister came up from Florida and was sitting in the living room and she said, [01:05:11.380 --> 01:05:22.740] do you have a hearing aid in? And I said, huh? Everybody just got laughing except my wife. [01:05:25.300 --> 01:05:29.300] She said, do you have that thing in here in wife mode again? [01:05:29.300 --> 01:05:36.820] Wife mode means it's either turned off or I don't have them in. Anyway, litigation guides. Get them. [01:05:37.700 --> 01:05:43.300] Before you write a motion or a pleading, read them. If you're going to sue somebody, [01:05:43.300 --> 01:05:50.100] get causes of action. Wherever it is in your litigation guide and just go down on all these [01:05:50.100 --> 01:05:57.860] causes of action. They're very well named. They're descriptive names. And you can see [01:05:57.860 --> 01:06:04.740] names and you'll come across claims you didn't know you could make. And you go to that claim [01:06:04.740 --> 01:06:12.420] and it will tell you how to make the claim. Every claim has a set of elements. [01:06:13.300 --> 01:06:20.100] Prevent yourself from filing a criminal complaint. Every criminal statute has a set of elements [01:06:20.100 --> 01:06:27.540] that must be there. You miss one of them, there is no criminal complaint. Every cause of action [01:06:27.540 --> 01:06:35.860] has a set of claims that you must not only claim, you must prove. Like fraud by nondisclosure. [01:06:36.900 --> 01:06:44.100] In fraud by nondisclosure, you must show that the defendant made a voluntary statement. [01:06:46.740 --> 01:06:54.340] The statement they made was untrue. The defendant knew the statement was untrue. [01:06:54.340 --> 01:07:01.300] If the defendant knew that you did not have adequate information to know that the statement [01:07:01.300 --> 01:07:09.140] was untrue, that you believed the statement, that you acted based on that belief and were [01:07:09.140 --> 01:07:18.980] harmed thereby. You miss any one of those and you don't have a claim. So anytime you're going to [01:07:18.980 --> 01:07:24.500] take action against someone, go to the litigation guide, find the claim or cause of action. [01:07:25.380 --> 01:07:32.260] And you must claim and prove every one of those. In your original pleading, you don't have to prove [01:07:32.260 --> 01:07:39.620] them all, but you have to claim and give sufficient facts to support each of those elements. [01:07:40.580 --> 01:07:43.860] Otherwise, you get a rule of 12 motion to dismiss failure of state of claim. [01:07:43.860 --> 01:07:49.540] That's the problem these guys are going to have, because they fail to properly answer [01:07:49.540 --> 01:07:55.780] everything these guys in Victoria County. Anyway, okay, Robin, have we answered all of your questions? [01:07:56.980 --> 01:08:01.380] I kind of took over from you. What else do you have for us? [01:08:01.380 --> 01:08:09.700] Oh, dude, I have plenty. So in this case, should I follow up and check on, because the prosecutor [01:08:09.700 --> 01:08:16.900] said this guy just wrote tickets for people that were violating the governor's order for quarantine. [01:08:16.900 --> 01:08:30.020] So- Oh, wait a minute. Was he just writing tickets and putting them on cars? [01:08:30.020 --> 01:08:36.900] Well, that's what it seems like. So when we did, and he didn't even put it on the car in our [01:08:36.900 --> 01:08:44.340] situation, she just got a letter in the mail with a ticket in it. So on the first trial on June 4th [01:08:44.340 --> 01:08:52.260] by Zoom, we heard like 10 other people that were there at the same day just giving up their rights [01:08:52.740 --> 01:08:56.420] and paying these tickets. Okay. This has been addressed by the courts [01:08:56.420 --> 01:09:09.780] over and over, primarily under these red light cameras. It creates a new crime, crime by ownership. [01:09:12.980 --> 01:09:20.100] If the officer did not personally see or hear you violating this COVID restriction, [01:09:20.100 --> 01:09:28.420] but he figured that you were probably violating it because he saw something that you owned [01:09:28.420 --> 01:09:34.500] in a place that would indicate that you were not abiding by these restrictions. [01:09:36.500 --> 01:09:44.100] That is not good enough. That's not good enough for a criminal complaint in any state. [01:09:44.100 --> 01:09:50.260] You should go for the, find out all the tickets that he wrote and file criminally against him [01:09:50.260 --> 01:09:58.100] for every single one. This has been addressed over and over by the courts. They will start doing this [01:09:58.740 --> 01:10:06.260] because 99% of the people charged with a crime will write a check and they'll collect a whole [01:10:06.260 --> 01:10:14.260] lot of money before somebody finally stands up and gets this thrown out. This is a good criminal. [01:10:15.380 --> 01:10:22.260] Okay. Write up a criminal complaint, go to the court and pull records on all these [01:10:23.060 --> 01:10:30.020] types of citations they've written, put those in a list and mail merge those into the complaints [01:10:30.020 --> 01:10:38.420] and send a hundred of them. A professional conduct complaint against each police officer, [01:10:38.420 --> 01:10:44.340] a criminal complaint against him, a criminal complaint against the judge and the prosecutor, [01:10:44.980 --> 01:10:52.180] judicial conduct complaint against the judge, bar grievance against the prosecuting attorney. [01:10:52.180 --> 01:11:01.300] You only have to build one copy of each of these documents and where the people's name goes in, [01:11:01.300 --> 01:11:09.780] you just put a merge field. That's easy enough to do in Microsoft Word. You take an Excel spreadsheet, [01:11:09.780 --> 01:11:15.060] you just list out all these people's names and stuff and you take your document and you go to [01:11:15.060 --> 01:11:22.180] the mail merge section and you just, you click on the location you want a name put in, you go over to [01:11:22.180 --> 01:11:30.100] the spreadsheet, you can click on that and drop it in place. And then when you merge it, it'll go, [01:11:30.900 --> 01:11:34.740] the first guy, it'll merge them all and then go to the next one, merge them all, just spit them all [01:11:34.740 --> 01:11:41.300] right out. Okay. I never heard of that. I've never heard of it. I've never heard of it. [01:11:41.300 --> 01:11:47.460] Okay. I never learned mail merge. Okay. I'm now inspired. [01:11:48.340 --> 01:11:56.340] Looking at mail merge, it's not that difficult. And when you write your document, you want cases [01:11:56.340 --> 01:12:03.540] that the essential facts are all the same. So the only thing you have to change is ticket dates, [01:12:03.540 --> 01:12:12.420] addresses, officer's name, officer's badge number, police department address. You know, [01:12:12.420 --> 01:12:20.500] there's stuff that changes with everyone and you merge them right in. I did 75 for WISE, [01:12:20.500 --> 01:12:29.380] 45 for WISE County. First degree felony aggravated assault charges, 45 TCO complaints, [01:12:29.380 --> 01:12:36.340] 35 bar grievances against the defendant's lawyer. It wasn't my lawyer, it was that other guy's lawyer, [01:12:36.340 --> 01:12:42.660] but he didn't file the document he should have, so I bargained him. I never hugged one peep, [01:12:43.780 --> 01:12:53.780] but every lawyer in the county now hates me. Yes. Especially one in particular. I couldn't [01:12:53.780 --> 01:13:00.020] find a bar number on this guy and he had a common name. So I looked him up and found three lawyers [01:13:00.020 --> 01:13:06.420] with the same name. Now, where I'm working out of is Decatur, Texas, their county seat on WISE [01:13:06.420 --> 01:13:11.300] County. One of these lawyers was in Decatur. Another one was in Fort Worth and another one's [01:13:11.300 --> 01:13:19.700] in Dallas. Fort Worth is 30 miles away, Dallas 50. So I said to myself, well, my goodness, [01:13:19.700 --> 01:13:27.620] which one can it be? Must be the one in Fort Worth. So I put his name on it. And sometimes [01:13:27.620 --> 01:13:38.500] serendipity happens. A friend of mine, he had a son that had, he was autistic, just slightly [01:13:38.500 --> 01:13:45.700] autistic, but it was enough that he kept getting in legal issues. And the guy was talking to his [01:13:45.700 --> 01:13:52.500] son's lawyer and mentioned my name. Since the lawyer freaked, this was the guy in Fort Worth. [01:13:52.500 --> 01:14:02.740] He bargained me. It wasn't even my client. I nearly fell out on the floor laughing. And so I [01:14:02.740 --> 01:14:09.700] called him and I said, hey man, Robert told me that I had bargained you by mistake. Oh, my bad. [01:14:09.700 --> 01:14:14.900] I will send a letter to the bar telling him that I made this big mistake. And then I'll bargain [01:14:14.900 --> 01:14:27.620] this other lawyer. And the guy says, no, no, no, don't do that. Okay. Point is, we got tools. [01:14:27.620 --> 01:14:33.940] We've got really powerful tools for start using them. So what else do you have for us? [01:14:33.940 --> 01:14:44.980] Oh, listen, are you sure? All right. You got a little soft there. [01:14:48.020 --> 01:14:54.660] Okay. The judge on another case was muting me. And do I have a lawsuit for that if that [01:14:54.660 --> 01:15:01.460] constitutes damages? And because I would not turn on my camera. I mentioned this in the chat group [01:15:01.460 --> 01:15:09.540] and you guys responded, but I haven't taken action yet. So I was wondering if they rescheduled me [01:15:10.180 --> 01:15:14.580] for November. And he said, we're just going to keep doing this until you turn on your camera. [01:15:17.380 --> 01:15:18.660] What did the rules say? [01:15:22.500 --> 01:15:28.580] Do they have any rules? He said it was a mandate from the Supreme Court. I was like, [01:15:28.580 --> 01:15:34.260] I politely decline. I just want to keep up privacy. And then I was like, well, [01:15:34.260 --> 01:15:38.100] please tell me the statute that compels me. I'd be happy to turn on my camera [01:15:38.100 --> 01:15:42.420] if you could tell me the statute that compels me to do that. He said that it was a Supreme Court [01:15:42.420 --> 01:15:47.700] mandate. And I was like, I'm not bound by mandate. But then he just kept muting me. And then he [01:15:47.700 --> 01:15:53.620] banished me for, kept my phone for two hours. I couldn't do anything. My phone went blank. [01:15:53.620 --> 01:16:00.820] And I just had a big right red leave on it. And so I didn't want to leave because I didn't want to, [01:16:01.940 --> 01:16:08.020] I didn't know what to do, but my phone, I couldn't mute my phone. So whoever came in my house, [01:16:08.020 --> 01:16:13.780] I didn't, I couldn't talk because I was getting recorded. So when he finally came back, [01:16:13.780 --> 01:16:19.220] he was like, after two hours. And that's why I want to complain. And I want to ask you guys, [01:16:19.220 --> 01:16:24.500] should I sue for damages? Because when he came back, he said, okay, so you're going to turn on [01:16:24.500 --> 01:16:29.620] your camera now? And I'm like, I'll turn on my camera. Just tell me, you know, why do I have to [01:16:29.620 --> 01:16:36.340] just prove that I have to? But he said it was a mandate and then rescheduled me. So do I have a [01:16:36.340 --> 01:16:43.700] case in your eyes? Yes. Supreme Court can issue mandates, but not to you. They're going to issue [01:16:43.700 --> 01:16:49.700] mandates to judges. Hang on. Randy Kelton, Brent Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio. We'll pick this up [01:16:49.700 --> 01:16:54.180] on the other side. We do have some more calls. We'll get to everybody. We've got four hours. So, [01:16:54.180 --> 01:17:24.100] so hang in there. We'll get to you. We'll be right back. [01:17:24.340 --> 01:17:28.980] How to answer letters and phone calls. How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [01:17:28.980 --> 01:17:34.580] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mears [01:17:34.580 --> 01:17:40.340] proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available [01:17:40.340 --> 01:17:45.300] as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue [01:17:45.300 --> 01:17:52.500] Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email [01:17:52.500 --> 01:18:01.540] michaelmears at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. I love Logos. Without the [01:18:01.540 --> 01:18:06.260] shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now [01:18:06.260 --> 01:18:11.620] that there's no going back. I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without Logos and I really want to [01:18:11.620 --> 01:18:15.540] help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of [01:18:15.540 --> 01:18:20.340] a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [01:18:20.340 --> 01:18:25.860] How can I help Logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, [01:18:25.860 --> 01:18:30.900] you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your [01:18:30.900 --> 01:18:38.340] cookies. Now go to logosradio.network.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now when you [01:18:38.340 --> 01:18:45.060] order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you [01:18:45.060 --> 01:18:51.460] have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow, [01:18:51.460 --> 01:18:56.900] giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. [01:18:56.900 --> 01:19:15.140] We are welcome. Happy holidays, Logos. This is the Logos Radio Network. [01:19:15.140 --> 01:19:27.860] Hang on a blind me. Don't bore me. Well, [01:19:31.460 --> 01:19:40.100] ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. I was blindsided, but now I can see you. [01:19:40.100 --> 01:19:51.940] Okay. We are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this Friday, [01:19:52.820 --> 01:20:01.300] the fifth day of August, 2022. And we're talking to Robin in New Jersey. Did I say that right, [01:20:01.300 --> 01:20:11.140] Robin? That sounds perfect. Okay. Pastor Massad spent a month teaching me how to say Worcester. [01:20:13.060 --> 01:20:19.060] It's not Worcestershire. It's Worcester. Anybody look at it. We were talking about this on the [01:20:19.060 --> 01:20:28.740] break. The Supreme Court, where do they get authority to issue an order to you as a private [01:20:28.740 --> 01:20:33.700] citizen? You know, I filed a criminal complaint against the governor in Texas. [01:20:36.420 --> 01:20:41.780] And I asked, where in the heck did you get authority to say anything to me? [01:20:43.780 --> 01:20:50.260] You are my public servant and I have authorized you to administer the executive branch of the [01:20:50.260 --> 01:20:59.460] state of Texas. I haven't authorized you to say a darn thing to me. I call that sedition. [01:20:59.460 --> 01:21:04.260] Where does the Supreme Court get authority to speak to you? [01:21:08.500 --> 01:21:14.020] They can only rule on cases. Or they can tell the judge that the judge has to have a camera. [01:21:14.020 --> 01:21:23.700] Okay. But where did they get this authority? File a challenge subject matter jurisdiction. [01:21:27.940 --> 01:21:34.100] Oh, no, no, no. Barrett, subject matter in person, in person. [01:21:34.100 --> 01:21:44.500] I was thinking about a mandamus. If he goes to a higher court and says, hey, command this lower court [01:21:45.220 --> 01:21:51.300] to let me in the courtroom and quit demanding that I have a camera to get in the courtroom. [01:21:52.580 --> 01:21:57.780] Courts are supposed to be open to the public. Please command this lower court to follow the [01:21:57.780 --> 01:22:05.140] law and let me in the courtroom. If I didn't have a case, I would be allowed to come in. [01:22:06.580 --> 01:22:08.100] That's a constitutional challenge. [01:22:09.220 --> 01:22:13.460] So then the higher court would say, what do you think you're doing telling him he can't come in [01:22:13.460 --> 01:22:17.780] the court? Well, he didn't have his camera on. He wasn't doing the Supreme Court mandate. Then [01:22:17.780 --> 01:22:20.100] they can talk it out with him and they can slap him for you. [01:22:20.100 --> 01:22:31.300] What was that doctrine we come up with the last week or week before last where you cannot be [01:22:32.260 --> 01:22:40.580] required to give up one constitutional right to enjoy another one? The constitutional something [01:22:40.580 --> 01:22:50.260] doctrine. Remember that, Brett? No, it doesn't stand out to me. [01:23:02.500 --> 01:23:07.780] I don't know. Maybe it could be a constitutional estoppel. Let me take a look. [01:23:07.780 --> 01:23:10.820] There was a specific name for it. [01:23:14.660 --> 01:23:18.100] So before you sue for damages, do we have to pull criminal, [01:23:19.540 --> 01:23:25.700] go through the criminal and civil process? I'm not sure that question made sense. [01:23:25.700 --> 01:23:37.540] To sue for civil damages, you would have to show that the court exceeded its authority, [01:23:38.820 --> 01:23:40.820] acted without subject matter jurisdiction. [01:23:40.820 --> 01:23:54.020] When they act outside without subject matter jurisdiction, then they don't have any immunity. [01:23:56.340 --> 01:24:00.260] You claim that he exerted an authority he did not previously have. [01:24:02.500 --> 01:24:08.180] I can't find this. There's a specific doctrine for this [01:24:08.180 --> 01:24:15.060] where the court has issued an order that required you to give up one right in order to exercise [01:24:15.060 --> 01:24:25.140] another. They have ordered you, what we talked about on the mentioned on the break was this [01:24:25.140 --> 01:24:28.340] constitutes slavery. Oh, wow. [01:24:28.340 --> 01:24:39.140] In that they are ordering you to spend your money and use your private equipment to serve [01:24:39.140 --> 01:24:43.140] their purpose. That's your computer. That's your internet connection. [01:24:45.300 --> 01:24:47.620] That's your electricity. You're paying for all of this. [01:24:49.300 --> 01:24:52.900] And they're ordering you to use what you're paying for to serve their purpose [01:24:52.900 --> 01:25:02.020] without giving you recompense. This is something they did hastily. [01:25:02.020 --> 01:25:12.580] The court themselves cannot pass law. So the Supreme can give directions to the judge, [01:25:12.580 --> 01:25:20.420] but the Supreme cannot create new law. There is no law authorizing them that I know of. [01:25:20.420 --> 01:25:31.380] Authorizing them that I know of to hold a court by Zoom. Where is the Zoom law? [01:25:36.180 --> 01:25:43.940] Unlike private citizens, a public official may only do what they are specifically authorized to do. [01:25:43.940 --> 01:25:48.100] And when I was reading through the litigation guide or read through the codes the other day, [01:25:48.100 --> 01:25:52.100] there's a code in the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and you may have something similar, [01:25:52.900 --> 01:26:02.100] that says they can hold an electronic hearing only if both parties agree in writing. [01:26:03.620 --> 01:26:11.140] And I'm about to hammer the local municipal court for holding this hearing without my [01:26:11.140 --> 01:26:16.100] written agreement to it. That's going to be fun. [01:26:16.100 --> 01:26:23.220] That's going to be fun. But in your case, this would be a good case to take them on with. [01:26:25.700 --> 01:26:33.700] Okay, Brett, what do they call it when they take something without... It's in the Constitution. [01:26:33.700 --> 01:26:39.860] They can't take your property without compensating you for it. [01:26:39.860 --> 01:26:47.060] Well, without due process of law. No, no, no. They can't take your property. [01:26:49.460 --> 01:26:58.020] There's one specifically. What's the term? Condemnation. They can't give your property [01:26:58.020 --> 01:27:05.380] and take it. They have to compensate you for it. Yeah. The U.S. fix says that private property [01:27:05.380 --> 01:27:13.060] can't be taken for public use without just compensation. That's it. They're taking [01:27:13.060 --> 01:27:18.420] your public property and using it for public use and not compensating you for it. [01:27:20.420 --> 01:27:28.420] Okay. Thank you. And let us do some research and let us know next week where this leads to. [01:27:28.420 --> 01:27:34.580] I will. Brett, Randy, thank you so much. God bless you all. Thank you so much. [01:27:35.700 --> 01:27:41.380] Okay. Thank you, Robin. Your timing was great because I was just fixing to drop you like a hot [01:27:41.380 --> 01:27:51.060] rock. Man, I just appreciate you so much, man. Listen, bless you. Thank you so much. Bless you. [01:27:51.060 --> 01:27:54.020] I'll get off the phone now so others have a chance. Thank you. [01:27:54.020 --> 01:28:01.860] Thank you. Okay. Now we have Chris and Tina. I see you there, but I've got a first time caller. [01:28:03.220 --> 01:28:10.340] 469 area code. Where is that? That's right in the middle of DFW. [01:28:11.860 --> 01:28:17.780] Hello. This is Chris. Can you hear me? Hello, Chris. Yes, we hear you. [01:28:17.780 --> 01:28:28.740] Yes. Can you hear me? Yes, we can. What state? Okay. Awesome. My name is Grace. [01:28:32.500 --> 01:28:39.540] So I kind of have a scenario going on. About a little bit more than a month ago, [01:28:39.540 --> 01:28:45.540] my husband beat me up pretty bad. He has a third degree felony charge from beating breast. [01:28:45.540 --> 01:28:50.500] I fled my home with my kids. We are now in a safe and clean environment. [01:28:51.620 --> 01:28:58.660] My house is in a mess because my husband wasn't providing maintenance. I'm not going back until [01:28:58.660 --> 01:29:04.900] it is fully fixed. Police reported the situation to CPS for family violence. [01:29:04.900 --> 01:29:17.300] I did one FaceTime call with the CPS worker with the youngest two, my oldest who... Okay. [01:29:20.100 --> 01:29:27.940] Let's see. I served the case worker with the affidavit... Wait, hold on a second. Brett, [01:29:27.940 --> 01:29:37.540] can you understand her? Yes, it's moving kind of quickly, but I think I'm keeping up. It sounds [01:29:37.540 --> 01:29:45.380] like... Any questions so far? So family violence, I'm so sorry that happened to you. That's awful. [01:29:46.180 --> 01:29:52.340] And I'm glad that you're in a safe environment right now. I didn't quite understand about the [01:29:52.340 --> 01:29:58.900] home. It sounds like you're not at your home. Your home is in some kind of disrepair and it's [01:29:58.900 --> 01:30:06.900] hazardous. Sorry, soft drink lovers. Even diet drinks can make you fat. A new study shows that [01:30:06.900 --> 01:30:11.780] diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff. I'm Dr. Catherine [01:30:11.780 --> 01:30:17.860] Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas. Privacy is under [01:30:17.860 --> 01:30:22.740] attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your [01:30:22.740 --> 01:30:28.420] privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights, [01:30:28.420 --> 01:30:34.660] say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:34.660 --> 01:30:39.540] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine [01:30:39.540 --> 01:30:47.060] alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage. Artificial sweeteners cut [01:30:47.060 --> 01:30:52.980] the calories and help you lose weight, right? Wrong. Researchers at UT San Antonio followed [01:30:52.980 --> 01:30:58.340] hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade. They found that regularly drinking diet soda [01:30:58.340 --> 01:31:03.860] expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all. The study's authors say [01:31:03.860 --> 01:31:08.660] artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to [01:31:08.660 --> 01:31:14.180] squelch it. Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger [01:31:14.180 --> 01:31:19.380] overall calorie intake. So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight. And if you need to [01:31:19.380 --> 01:31:25.540] shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:31:25.540 --> 01:31:33.700] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. This is building seven, a 47 story skyscraper that [01:31:33.700 --> 01:31:38.260] fell on the afternoon of September 11th. The government says that fire brought it down. However, [01:31:38.260 --> 01:31:44.100] 1500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow [01:31:44.100 --> 01:31:48.740] service members have given their lives. Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not [01:31:48.740 --> 01:31:52.500] a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an [01:31:52.500 --> 01:31:57.940] Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to [01:31:57.940 --> 01:32:04.980] rememberbuildingseven.org today. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [01:32:04.980 --> 01:32:08.740] In today's America, we live in an us against them society. And if we, the people, are ever going to [01:32:08.740 --> 01:32:12.980] have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those [01:32:12.980 --> 01:32:16.500] rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private [01:32:16.500 --> 01:32:20.980] capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least [01:32:20.980 --> 01:32:25.300] expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [01:32:25.300 --> 01:32:29.300] Former Sheriff's Deputy A. Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most [01:32:29.300 --> 01:32:33.380] comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how [01:32:33.380 --> 01:32:37.540] to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going [01:32:37.540 --> 01:32:42.260] to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's [01:32:42.260 --> 01:32:46.980] book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 [01:32:46.980 --> 01:32:51.220] seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for [01:32:51.220 --> 01:32:55.300] your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, [01:32:55.300 --> 01:32:58.340] and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:32:58.340 --> 01:33:02.340] Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:33:28.500 --> 01:33:56.980] Okay, we are back. This is the Rule of Law Radio, [01:33:56.980 --> 01:34:03.620] Randy Tilton. I'm Brett Fountain. And we are talking with, did you say Chris? [01:34:08.580 --> 01:34:14.420] Chris? Oh, hold on. She's nodding. Yeah. Chris and- [01:34:14.420 --> 01:34:21.060] Did you say Chris? Christ? I couldn't quite- Say it again? [01:34:21.060 --> 01:34:30.420] Hello? Yes. All right. I guess ready? Did you say that your name is Chris? [01:34:32.100 --> 01:34:46.820] Grace. Grace. Okay. So Grace, and you're in Texas, I think you said the situation is that you are in [01:34:46.820 --> 01:34:55.460] a safe area right now with this family violence, but you have- what was the thing about your house? [01:34:55.460 --> 01:35:03.540] Is it in disrepair? Yeah, it's just- my house has been failed to provide maintenance, so I'm not [01:35:03.540 --> 01:35:13.380] going to go back until it's clean and some issues are taken care of. So CPS would probably have [01:35:13.380 --> 01:35:22.580] cause if I moved back. Okay. What is your question for us? [01:35:22.580 --> 01:35:34.260] So basically, I served my caseworker with affidavits of facts and affidavits of status. [01:35:34.260 --> 01:35:46.500] She responded, her supervisor responded, their ADA said they had no legal obligations to respond [01:35:46.500 --> 01:35:51.700] to the affidavits because there is no subpoena and no cause number for a lawsuit. [01:35:53.060 --> 01:35:55.140] That's true. They left me alone for two weeks. [01:35:55.140 --> 01:36:02.820] An affidavit is just a statement. It doesn't really mean anything. It carries no legal obligation. [01:36:04.180 --> 01:36:06.820] What did your affidavit allege? [01:36:09.060 --> 01:36:15.540] Basically, established my constitutional rights with the status [01:36:16.420 --> 01:36:20.020] constitutionally- Okay, hold on, hold on. That means nothing. [01:36:20.020 --> 01:36:28.020] Okay. It just means nothing. It imparts no obligation on the other party. [01:36:30.100 --> 01:36:40.100] The affidavit will have some meaning if you file it as an attachment to a [01:36:40.100 --> 01:36:45.380] motion or pleading in a court action. Are you in the process of a divorce? [01:36:45.380 --> 01:36:52.020] I will be. Not yet. Not yet. Okay. [01:36:53.860 --> 01:36:56.980] What were you hoping to accomplish with these affidavits? [01:36:59.220 --> 01:37:04.020] Oops. Hold on. Hit the wrong button. Okay. Say that again. I accidentally muted you. [01:37:04.020 --> 01:37:14.580] I did some research on CPS and sometimes they can be overly aggressive and quick to reach kids [01:37:15.300 --> 01:37:21.460] when they shouldn't be. My goal is to stop them. I don't- [01:37:21.460 --> 01:37:25.380] So you were just trying to be kind of like preventive maintenance. You wanted to [01:37:25.380 --> 01:37:28.980] be sure about that upfront, make sure that nobody's going to take away the children? [01:37:28.980 --> 01:37:34.180] Yes. Okay. Well, [01:37:36.340 --> 01:37:42.660] that brings up a pretty serious question. Did you leave your husband? [01:37:44.260 --> 01:37:52.900] Yes. I have not seen him since that night. Okay. This could be a problem because it can be [01:37:52.900 --> 01:37:59.300] abandonment. He may be able to claim kidnapping. Does he not know where you're at? [01:38:02.260 --> 01:38:09.780] He's made guesses based on his mom. His mom told me she believes I'm staying at such and such [01:38:09.780 --> 01:38:16.980] place and she was correct that I did not confirm that. You need to get something legal. You need [01:38:16.980 --> 01:38:24.100] to go to the court and petition the court for a restraining order against him. Do you have [01:38:24.820 --> 01:38:31.780] any filings? Do you have any filings with the police concerning family violence? [01:38:33.220 --> 01:38:40.180] Yes. Uh-huh. Yes. Do you need to petition the court for a protective order? [01:38:40.180 --> 01:38:47.780] I have a protective order. Oh, okay. Good, good, good, good. I was concerned you might be charged [01:38:47.780 --> 01:38:53.700] for kidnapping, but since you have a protective order, that's good. Okay. Do you want to divorce [01:38:53.700 --> 01:39:03.620] your husband? Yes. Get it started. The plaintiff always has the advantage. [01:39:03.620 --> 01:39:09.140] If you don't have funds, then ask for a court appointing counsel. [01:39:11.860 --> 01:39:18.420] And we'll show you how to handle counsel. Lawyers tend not to want to do their jobs. [01:39:21.780 --> 01:39:28.580] But okay, I guess maybe I'm getting ahead of myself. What did you want from us? [01:39:28.580 --> 01:39:38.100] Guidance on how to deal with CPS. So, I did text the CPS investigator contacted me yesterday. [01:39:38.100 --> 01:39:47.140] They don't have any charges on me. And he told me taking the kids is not on the table yet right now. [01:39:48.020 --> 01:39:56.740] Okay. Well, let me say this first. I had a good friend. She got a job at the CPS. [01:39:56.740 --> 01:40:06.020] And it, dealing with the things she had to deal with just killed her soul. [01:40:06.980 --> 01:40:12.660] She tried to get these two children away from a couple, a two-year-old and a three-year-old. [01:40:13.540 --> 01:40:20.100] Tried three times and the judge refused to remove them from the family. A month after the third time, [01:40:20.100 --> 01:40:26.260] the parents were passed out on drugs. The two-year-old got out on the porch. [01:40:26.260 --> 01:40:32.260] The three-year-old went out to get her, the door closed behind them, and they froze to death on the porch. [01:40:34.260 --> 01:40:44.660] It just killed her soul. Yeah. The job they do is extremely hard. So, my suggestion, [01:40:44.660 --> 01:40:52.260] first, do not consider these guys to be ogres who are looking for nothing else than to steal your children from you. [01:40:52.260 --> 01:40:59.220] That is not the case. These are human beings. Now, if you start to fight with them, they'll fight with you. [01:41:00.580 --> 01:41:10.020] But if you treat them as your allies, they will tend to be your allies. Unless, you know, unless they shoot you, [01:41:10.020 --> 01:41:16.260] they will tend to be your allies. Unless, unless they show some other side of themselves. But [01:41:17.300 --> 01:41:24.580] first, they're human beings. I hear all this stuff about them, but every person in that [01:41:25.220 --> 01:41:32.660] area that I've talked to, they don't stay any long. Makes them nuts. Yeah. Trying to [01:41:32.660 --> 01:41:38.580] save these kids and they're not able to just makes them crazy. I suggest if you treat them [01:41:38.580 --> 01:41:44.740] as if they are your helpers and your, your saviors, they will try to be just exactly that. [01:41:46.420 --> 01:41:51.940] So, don't expect them to be bad guys first. Give them a chance. Yeah, they haven't brought any kind [01:41:51.940 --> 01:41:58.500] of fight to you yet. So, you don't have to, you don't have to be, [01:42:00.980 --> 01:42:04.740] look, you can be wise and not give them anything to work with. [01:42:04.740 --> 01:42:12.500] Yes. At the same time, not already bowing up and starting to look like a fight waiting to happen. [01:42:13.620 --> 01:42:18.900] I have a question I'm going to ask, but don't answer it. Are you a drug addict? [01:42:20.500 --> 01:42:27.700] No. You don't have to answer. The only way they'll take a mother's children from her [01:42:27.700 --> 01:42:37.300] is if she is a confirmed drug addict. That's it. Other than that, the mother gets the children. [01:42:37.300 --> 01:42:45.780] I had a friend whose wife decided that she was a lesbian and wanted out of the marriage and didn't [01:42:45.780 --> 01:42:57.860] want the kids. The judge put Hal through the wringer. He was, he, the judge believed that the mother [01:42:57.860 --> 01:43:04.660] should have the children and he made Hal jump through every hoop you could imagine. [01:43:06.100 --> 01:43:12.900] And Hal was real upset about that. I told him, Hal, this judge don't care about you. [01:43:12.900 --> 01:43:19.780] He doesn't care about your wife. He only cares about those children. When you go to CPS and if [01:43:19.780 --> 01:43:27.620] you get in court, you have to understand they don't care about you. They're only going to care [01:43:27.620 --> 01:43:36.340] about those children. So everything you do should be couched under the best interest of the children. [01:43:36.340 --> 01:43:41.460] And if you assume that's why they're there and treat them as if they're there to protect your [01:43:41.460 --> 01:43:47.220] children, you will find they absolutely will. Unless they step out of line, in which case come [01:43:47.220 --> 01:43:51.780] to us and we'll help you get them back in line. Hang on. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, [01:43:51.780 --> 01:43:54.260] the rule of our radio, we'll be right back. [01:43:56.260 --> 01:44:00.100] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved. [01:44:00.100 --> 01:44:04.900] Except in the area of nutrition, people feed their pets better than they feed themselves. [01:44:04.900 --> 01:44:10.740] And it's time we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic [01:44:10.740 --> 01:44:16.020] environment is good nutrition. In a world where natural fruits have been irradiated, [01:44:16.020 --> 01:44:21.060] adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:44:21.060 --> 01:44:25.380] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products. [01:44:25.380 --> 01:44:30.980] Most of which we reject. We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing [01:44:30.980 --> 01:44:38.500] distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, [01:44:38.500 --> 01:44:44.740] your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of [01:44:44.740 --> 01:44:50.500] young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health, [01:44:50.500 --> 01:44:55.780] help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now. [01:44:55.780 --> 01:45:02.820] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with JurisDictionary, [01:45:02.820 --> 01:45:10.340] the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [01:45:10.340 --> 01:45:15.780] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, [01:45:15.780 --> 01:45:21.620] know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now [01:45:21.620 --> 01:45:28.100] you can too. JurisDictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning [01:45:28.100 --> 01:45:34.260] experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about [01:45:34.260 --> 01:45:40.260] the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, [01:45:40.260 --> 01:45:47.860] video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit [01:45:47.860 --> 01:46:11.220] ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:17.860 --> 01:46:44.180] Okay, we are back. We're at the Kelton Breast Fountain with Rule of Law Radio, and I'm talking [01:46:44.180 --> 01:46:56.580] about the Breast in Texas, and I suggest you get something in the court quickly. File an affidavit [01:46:56.580 --> 01:47:04.500] of inability to pay, and for you that should be relatively simple. You're taking care of the kids [01:47:04.500 --> 01:47:16.500] and ask for an order from the court for child support and a restraining order against him. [01:47:17.140 --> 01:47:24.580] Since you have reported domestic violence, he's going to be in a very negative situation. [01:47:24.580 --> 01:47:34.580] Are you there? Gracie, are you there? [01:47:36.820 --> 01:47:43.940] Hello. Sorry. Hi. Honestly, I'm in a little bit better position than my husband. I supported my [01:47:43.940 --> 01:47:55.940] family well on my income. He was unemployed for six years until February. He started working. [01:47:57.380 --> 01:48:03.940] Okay. Well, let me explain about inability to pay. It does not mean that you are destitute. [01:48:03.940 --> 01:48:13.700] Do you have a lot of extra money? No. No. That's what it means. If you have to pay court costs, [01:48:14.660 --> 01:48:21.860] then that will take away from your ability to take care of your kids and support yourself. [01:48:22.420 --> 01:48:25.220] It doesn't mean that you're broke. It doesn't mean that you don't make any money, [01:48:25.220 --> 01:48:30.820] but it would cause an undue hardship and kill your access to the court. [01:48:30.820 --> 01:48:42.100] Okay. Go ahead and request it. Okay. Then when you get the lawyer, [01:48:45.380 --> 01:48:51.140] keep us appraised of what he's doing. You understand that the lawyer doesn't want to do anything. [01:48:54.340 --> 01:48:59.940] He doesn't make really good money doing stuff. He may make 100 or 200 bucks an hour. [01:48:59.940 --> 01:49:05.220] He makes a whole lot more money getting a retainer. If he's court appointed, [01:49:05.220 --> 01:49:10.980] he's not going to want to do anything. He's going to want to do things that are billable hours. [01:49:12.100 --> 01:49:16.100] As court appointed a counsel, he'll get a certain amount of money, [01:49:16.100 --> 01:49:21.300] no matter how hard he works. He's not going to want to work. That's okay. We can handle that. [01:49:23.060 --> 01:49:29.220] We have ways of motivating them and controlling your attorneys. If you've been listening to the [01:49:29.220 --> 01:49:36.580] show, you heard me talk about Dan and San Marcos really working over his attorneys. [01:49:37.140 --> 01:49:43.540] We're pushing his attorneys to get the prosecutor to drop the case against him [01:49:44.340 --> 01:49:49.620] to get him to leave his attorneys alone. We can show you how to handle the attorneys, [01:49:50.340 --> 01:49:55.620] but you really need a restraining order. That'll put you in the driver's seat. [01:49:55.620 --> 01:50:00.900] Okay. All these affidavits and stuff. [01:50:00.900 --> 01:50:03.220] I will be asking for that in the divorce case. [01:50:05.380 --> 01:50:13.300] Once you have a case going, you can file the affidavit of fact either as an attachment [01:50:13.300 --> 01:50:20.420] to a motion or pleading, wherein in the motion or pleading, you make a direct reference [01:50:20.420 --> 01:50:27.620] to the attached affidavit, where you can state that the facts of this case are contained in [01:50:28.660 --> 01:50:35.460] an affidavit attached as Exhibit A, and then you attach it as Exhibit A. Now it's before the court. [01:50:36.660 --> 01:50:40.580] If you just file an affidavit in the court, it's not before the court. [01:50:42.500 --> 01:50:48.500] I'm just reading through the rules of court today, and it specifically addressed that in affidavits. [01:50:48.500 --> 01:50:54.500] Just putting it in the record does not bring it properly before the court, so the court [01:50:54.500 --> 01:51:03.940] can't consider it. You have to reference it in a motion or pleading and show why it's relevant [01:51:05.380 --> 01:51:12.900] to the case it had, then it's before the court. So first thing you need is a case, [01:51:12.900 --> 01:51:19.220] and if you go to the court and move for a restraining order, and then file for divorce. [01:51:21.220 --> 01:51:28.900] If you want a divorce, if you think you can fix this, then just file for the restraining order, [01:51:28.900 --> 01:51:33.220] and maybe ask the court to order anger management or something for you. [01:51:33.220 --> 01:51:36.740] Mediation, something like that. [01:51:36.740 --> 01:51:40.020] Yeah, what do you want at the end of the day? [01:51:40.020 --> 01:51:47.380] Honestly, what I want is I don't even care about child support if I can get him out of my life [01:51:47.380 --> 01:51:49.140] and out of my children's lives. [01:51:49.140 --> 01:51:51.460] Okay, ask for child support anyway. [01:51:51.460 --> 01:51:57.540] Okay. Yeah, I don't know if that's realistic. [01:51:57.540 --> 01:52:06.820] It's okay. It's okay. You ask for it. That gives you some leverage to get him to come to the table. [01:52:06.820 --> 01:52:12.980] Going to court is always like playing poker. Come in with your best hand. [01:52:14.420 --> 01:52:18.740] You can always deal it down to what you want. Don't ask for just what you want, [01:52:19.940 --> 01:52:22.740] or you'll have to deal down to something below that. [01:52:24.900 --> 01:52:29.060] Go in with your best hand. If you're not concerned about child support, [01:52:29.060 --> 01:52:36.660] put it on the table anyway, and tell him, if you don't want to have to pay all this child support, [01:52:37.540 --> 01:52:41.700] make me this deal, and we'll agree to it, and we'll go home and be happy. [01:52:44.260 --> 01:52:46.980] But make sure you put in all your bargaining chips. [01:52:46.980 --> 01:52:50.660] You can always back off of them any time you want to. Does that make sense? [01:52:51.700 --> 01:52:52.200] Yeah. [01:52:52.200 --> 01:53:00.600] Watch these attorneys. If you have any funds, if you have any estate, the attorneys are going [01:53:00.600 --> 01:53:07.080] to do, both sides are going to do everything they can to swallow your estate. They will try to put [01:53:07.080 --> 01:53:14.120] the two of you at odds with each other, and keep you at odds with each other while they're getting [01:53:14.120 --> 01:53:21.480] billable hours from you. They will try to put the two of you at odds with each other, and keep you [01:53:21.480 --> 01:53:26.440] at odds with each other while they're getting billable hours from you. It's sick. It's what they do. [01:53:27.720 --> 01:53:34.040] And the way you fix that is the first time his lawyer does something you don't like, you bar [01:53:34.040 --> 01:53:42.120] grieve him. And, oh, he will have a conniption. And if he says one word to you, or one word to [01:53:42.120 --> 01:53:50.280] the court about it, you bar grieve him for that. Now you've got his attention. And if you bar [01:53:50.280 --> 01:53:54.920] grieve the lawyer on the other side, and you have a lawyer, even if he's court appointed to counsel, [01:53:55.800 --> 01:54:00.040] when you bar grieve the lawyer on the other side, you got your lawyer's attention big time. [01:54:01.560 --> 01:54:03.640] Because he's going to be afraid you'll do it to him. [01:54:08.680 --> 01:54:11.800] We've been doing this a long time, and we found their weak spots. [01:54:13.480 --> 01:54:17.960] They consider you to be ignorant and easy to manipulate, especially a woman. [01:54:17.960 --> 01:54:27.880] But that may sound chauvinist, but that's what both male and female lawyers do. [01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:35.320] So we give them a new awakening. Once you bar grieve them, [01:54:35.880 --> 01:54:38.120] that's going to adjust their attitude big time. [01:54:41.000 --> 01:54:45.800] Okay, but first, you got to know exactly what you want at the end of the day. [01:54:45.800 --> 01:54:55.080] What do you want? What, to you, would be your least acceptable outcome? [01:54:57.080 --> 01:55:06.120] Least acceptable? Ideally, I want full custody of my kids. I don't want to deal with visitation, [01:55:06.840 --> 01:55:10.200] because he'll screw them up. And I want 70-30 split. [01:55:10.200 --> 01:55:19.000] That's a lot to ask for. That's best or least? If he's put me through... [01:55:19.960 --> 01:55:25.800] Okay, the courts are not going to care what he put you through. The courts are only going to care [01:55:25.800 --> 01:55:32.520] what is best for the children. So don't ever mention to the court what he's put you through. [01:55:32.520 --> 01:55:42.200] Mention what he's put the children through. And what you ask the court for is for the benefit of [01:55:42.200 --> 01:55:49.720] the children, not your benefit. You do that, you'll have the court on your side. If you go in there [01:55:49.720 --> 01:55:58.600] and tell the court what an SOB is and how mistreated you've been by him, they're not going to be [01:55:58.600 --> 01:56:07.000] terribly impressed. But if you only speak to the best interest of the children, the court's going [01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:13.160] to listen. Because at the end of the day, the courts are not going to care about either one of you. [01:56:14.600 --> 01:56:23.080] They're only going to care about the children. Did he commit domestic violence in front of the [01:56:23.080 --> 01:56:28.840] violence in front of the children? No, they were asleep. [01:56:31.720 --> 01:56:33.400] See, that's going to work in his favor. [01:56:36.360 --> 01:56:39.240] Think in terms, you're the judge here and you're a grandpa. [01:56:42.840 --> 01:56:47.000] Wait, say that again. They saw me really beat up. [01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:55.000] The children saw it was physically visible to the children that something had happened? [01:56:56.440 --> 01:57:00.600] Yeah, my face was busted up. How old are these children? [01:57:03.480 --> 01:57:05.240] 12, 6, and 4. [01:57:08.120 --> 01:57:13.400] Wait a minute, the oldest is 12? Yeah, she said 12, 6, and 4. [01:57:13.400 --> 01:57:19.240] The 6, and 4. The 12-year-old knows what's going on. So yeah, that'll help. [01:57:23.160 --> 01:57:31.880] Okay, you want to avoid getting the children in this if you can. But even though he hasn't committed [01:57:32.680 --> 01:57:37.800] the violence in front of the children, they're very likely to be aware of it. [01:57:37.800 --> 01:57:43.800] Certainly the 12-year-old will be. Yeah, the little one, the 4-year-old, she'll say, [01:57:43.800 --> 01:57:48.200] she asked me this morning, did daddy hurt your lip? Or she remembers. [01:57:51.400 --> 01:58:00.360] Okay, then that'll help. That'll help. So, the best advice is never say anything to the court [01:58:01.400 --> 01:58:07.400] about you, other than the domestic violence. But the only thing you want from the court is [01:58:07.400 --> 01:58:10.680] what's best for the children. If you couch everything in that perspective, [01:58:10.680 --> 01:58:19.560] you will get a much, much better read. So, write down what would be your least [01:58:20.120 --> 01:58:24.600] acceptable outcome? I know you want a 70-30 split. That's going to be real hard to get. [01:58:25.560 --> 01:58:32.760] What would be your least? 50-50 with minimal visitation or supervised. [01:58:32.760 --> 01:58:41.960] You might be able to get 70-30 if you negotiate away your child support. [01:58:45.320 --> 01:58:53.720] So, you're asking for a lot in child support. The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, [01:58:53.720 --> 01:58:57.480] yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [01:58:57.480 --> 01:59:03.320] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the [01:59:03.320 --> 01:59:09.960] profound meaning of the Scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation [01:59:09.960 --> 01:59:16.520] is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [01:59:17.320 --> 01:59:22.600] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance [01:59:22.600 --> 01:59:28.360] into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would [01:59:28.360 --> 01:59:34.040] like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact [01:59:34.040 --> 01:59:44.040] study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online [01:59:44.040 --> 01:59:53.160] at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. [01:59:53.160 --> 02:00:14.200] Logosradionetwork.com.