[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.500 --> 00:09.500] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.500 --> 00:11.000] Our liberty depends on it. [00:11.000 --> 00:16.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights. [00:16.500 --> 00:18.500] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.500 --> 00:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.000 --> 00:26.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:26.500 --> 00:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.000 --> 00:34.500] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:34.500 --> 00:38.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [00:38.000 --> 00:42.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.000 --> 00:45.500] Start over with Startpage. [00:45.500 --> 00:47.500] Spar, it's what fighters do. [00:47.500 --> 00:51.000] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:51.000 --> 00:54.000] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:54.000 --> 00:56.500] Spar with an extra P. [00:56.500 --> 01:03.000] S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion. [01:03.000 --> 01:08.500] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion. [01:08.500 --> 01:10.500] But petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.500 --> 01:14.500] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.500 --> 01:17.500] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, [01:17.500 --> 01:21.000] we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:21.000 --> 01:26.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.000 --> 01:34.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:34.500 --> 01:38.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:38.000 --> 01:39.500] Our liberty depends on it. [01:39.500 --> 01:43.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way [01:43.000 --> 01:46.000] to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:46.000 --> 01:48.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:48.000 --> 01:51.500] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:51.500 --> 01:56.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:56.500 --> 01:58.000] So protect your rights. [01:58.000 --> 02:01.500] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.500 --> 02:04.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [02:04.000 --> 02:08.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [02:08.000 --> 02:12.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.000 --> 02:15.000] Start over with StartPage. [02:15.000 --> 02:19.000] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms [02:19.000 --> 02:22.000] around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:22.000 --> 02:26.000] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, [02:26.000 --> 02:30.000] arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:30.000 --> 02:33.000] Get it? Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? [02:33.000 --> 02:37.000] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well [02:37.000 --> 02:38.000] when he said, [02:38.000 --> 02:43.000] The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, [02:43.000 --> 02:47.000] one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, [02:47.000 --> 02:51.000] but which historically has proved to always be possible. [02:51.000 --> 03:17.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:17.000 --> 03:42.000] OK, we are back with the Rule of Law Radio on Friday, the 8th of July, 2022. [03:42.000 --> 03:47.000] So this evening, we are talking with David in Texas. [03:47.000 --> 03:50.000] And David, I think we were just wrapping up. [03:50.000 --> 03:52.000] Is there anything else that you had? [03:52.000 --> 03:57.000] We wanted to see if there's anybody that could do a 1983 lawsuit for you. [03:57.000 --> 04:01.000] And I didn't know of anybody, but... [04:01.000 --> 04:09.000] Yeah, I think that I learned a lot from the two that gave me the answers that they gave me [04:09.000 --> 04:13.000] as far as wouldn't take the suit because I didn't have a certainty number. [04:13.000 --> 04:22.000] So I've definitely been doing some hard study, you know, the last month or so, [04:22.000 --> 04:26.000] and putting in a lot of hours staying up late. [04:26.000 --> 04:32.000] But anyhow, I am in the process of drawing one up right now, as a matter of fact, [04:32.000 --> 04:34.000] and coming along pretty well. [04:34.000 --> 04:43.000] So I was just hoping that maybe that you might have had maybe a recommendation [04:43.000 --> 04:47.000] that maybe I could even pass it in front of them or, you know, [04:47.000 --> 04:51.000] what I've gotten put together and have it looked over. [04:51.000 --> 04:53.000] But it looks like... [04:53.000 --> 04:55.000] Well, we do some of that on our telegram. [04:55.000 --> 04:58.000] We've got a chat group on telegram where we do some of that. [04:58.000 --> 05:02.000] Sometimes we'll pass a document back and forth and post it for people to see. [05:02.000 --> 05:05.000] You know, you can redact some parts if you want to, [05:05.000 --> 05:10.000] but then people will chime in and happily help you out. [05:10.000 --> 05:12.000] Yeah, that sounds good. [05:12.000 --> 05:17.000] Also, too, what do you know about injunctive relief? [05:17.000 --> 05:19.000] I mean, it sounds... [05:19.000 --> 05:24.000] From what I've studied about it and looked up about it, [05:24.000 --> 05:30.000] it sounds like there's something that I need to do to get them to stop what they're doing. [05:30.000 --> 05:36.000] Yeah, that's the idea is you're asking a judge to issue an order [05:36.000 --> 05:41.000] that will stop somebody from doing something. [05:41.000 --> 05:47.000] And you need to, just like anything else, you paint the picture with some facts. [05:47.000 --> 05:52.000] You make some allegations of fact and bring some law to the table [05:52.000 --> 05:59.000] and show how that applies, and then you move the court to do that. [05:59.000 --> 06:03.000] And I can probably do that at the district level, right? [06:03.000 --> 06:05.000] It depends on what it is that you're asking for [06:05.000 --> 06:10.000] and whether they have jurisdiction to do that, because you ask a court for something. [06:10.000 --> 06:11.000] Yeah. [06:11.000 --> 06:17.000] And the court has certain jurisdiction that it can do, right? [06:17.000 --> 06:20.000] You don't ask... [06:20.000 --> 06:28.000] If you work at the grocery store, you don't ask your supervisor to do something that is, [06:28.000 --> 06:32.000] like, can you make the gas station stay open later? [06:32.000 --> 06:34.000] Well, they're not related. [06:34.000 --> 06:40.000] You have to go to the people that can give you something that's within their scope. [06:40.000 --> 06:42.000] Exactly. [06:42.000 --> 06:48.000] Yeah, it sounds like that I will be able to do that then. [06:48.000 --> 06:53.000] Mr. Kelton doesn't have an email contact that he puts out, does he? [06:53.000 --> 07:01.000] Yeah, Randy at RuleOfLawRadio.com. [07:01.000 --> 07:04.000] You could send your document to him, [07:04.000 --> 07:07.000] and you could ask him about the telegram brick, too, if you want. [07:07.000 --> 07:18.000] It's T.ME slash The Law Society. [07:18.000 --> 07:20.000] Okay, got it. [07:20.000 --> 07:21.000] So, yeah. [07:21.000 --> 07:26.000] We were saying that it's Randy at RuleOfLawRadio.com. [07:26.000 --> 07:29.000] That's right. [07:29.000 --> 07:35.000] Yeah, and he always says the best time to get him is early mornings. [07:35.000 --> 07:37.000] Okay, right. [07:37.000 --> 07:40.000] I guess he just gets a flood, and so if you get him in the morning, [07:40.000 --> 07:42.000] then he'll be able to see it, and if not, [07:42.000 --> 07:45.000] then it kind of gets pushed down underneath everything else. [07:45.000 --> 07:49.000] I don't know how that is, yeah. [07:49.000 --> 07:52.000] Well, I understand, hey, it was great talking to you, [07:52.000 --> 08:00.000] and yes, this is my first time, and as far as calling in, so... [08:00.000 --> 08:01.000] Well, I'm glad you called. [08:01.000 --> 08:03.000] It's good talking with you. [08:03.000 --> 08:07.000] Well, it's good talking with you, and I really appreciate your show. [08:07.000 --> 08:09.000] All right. [08:09.000 --> 08:11.000] Have a good night. [08:11.000 --> 08:16.000] Okay, and next up we have Ted in California. [08:16.000 --> 08:18.000] Good evening, Ted. [08:18.000 --> 08:21.000] What's on your mind? [08:21.000 --> 08:22.000] Hey, Randy and Brad. [08:22.000 --> 08:24.000] Good evening. [08:24.000 --> 08:31.000] Well, the last time I went to court on June 20th, [08:31.000 --> 08:40.000] the judge, very interesting, the judge forced this public defender on me, [08:40.000 --> 08:45.000] and then at the next hearing, the public defender didn't show up, remember, [08:45.000 --> 08:49.000] and I told you guys that he sent some little old guy in there, [08:49.000 --> 08:55.000] and I felt bad for the man because I had to get up there and say objection, [08:55.000 --> 08:59.000] and they don't represent me, and this is fraud on the court. [08:59.000 --> 09:03.000] We have no agreement, and I felt bad about it, [09:03.000 --> 09:10.000] and then that was two months prior to June 20th, actually more than two months, [09:10.000 --> 09:21.000] but the point being is after the judge forced this independent lawyer on me, [09:21.000 --> 09:25.000] it's not the public defender, it's not the alternate defender, [09:25.000 --> 09:30.000] it's the independent defender, and the judge is saying that, you know, [09:30.000 --> 09:33.000] I asked for the judge's authority to do that. [09:33.000 --> 09:37.000] Of course, he went silent. [09:37.000 --> 09:41.000] And then, like I said, the next time I went, [09:41.000 --> 09:46.000] this independent defender didn't show up [09:46.000 --> 09:50.000] and sent this guy specially appeared for all of his cases. [09:50.000 --> 09:53.000] Well, anything happened on June 20th, [09:53.000 --> 09:57.000] this guy pops up and says he's specially appearing, [09:57.000 --> 10:01.000] and I go up and I say objection, and I started to say a few things, [10:01.000 --> 10:03.000] and then the judge shut me down. [10:03.000 --> 10:08.000] Oh, wait, so the attorney or the independent public defender, [10:08.000 --> 10:12.000] he's saying that he is appearing specially, [10:12.000 --> 10:14.000] or he's saying that you are appearing specially? [10:14.000 --> 10:19.000] He sent somebody to appear for him. [10:19.000 --> 10:20.000] I forget the guy's name. [10:20.000 --> 10:23.000] I don't even know his name, and I don't care to know his name [10:23.000 --> 10:26.000] because he doesn't represent me, but what I'm getting at is... [10:26.000 --> 10:29.000] The representative for the representative, nice. [10:29.000 --> 10:34.000] Right, and so I wanted to make that point on the record [10:34.000 --> 10:41.000] that since you've appointed this guy, he's not even showing up in court. [10:41.000 --> 10:46.000] And I wanted to say, look, I don't believe you have the authority. [10:46.000 --> 10:52.000] You've refused to show me your authority to force a lawyer on me against my will, [10:52.000 --> 10:55.000] but now the guy's not even showing up for court, [10:55.000 --> 10:59.000] and he's sending this guy to specially appear for him. [10:59.000 --> 11:03.000] But the judge kind of shut everything down, [11:03.000 --> 11:13.000] and also I demanded that the prosecutor state their appearance [11:13.000 --> 11:19.000] because the prosecutor on this case has not appeared in the case for like three years. [11:19.000 --> 11:29.000] It's routine that they have somebody from the DA's office [11:29.000 --> 11:33.000] that sits at a table there and appears for all the cases, okay? [11:33.000 --> 11:39.000] But it's not routine on this particular day because the judge, he shut me down, [11:39.000 --> 11:45.000] he kind of threatened me, and not kind of, he threatened me. [11:45.000 --> 11:49.000] He's basically telling me to stop talking. [11:49.000 --> 11:52.000] He interjected at a good moment and then starts in with, [11:52.000 --> 11:58.000] look, you're represented, but I have let you talk, but you keep saying the same things. [11:58.000 --> 12:05.000] And he's basically saying that if I spoke anymore that, you know, [12:05.000 --> 12:07.000] he was going to have me arrested or something. [12:07.000 --> 12:10.000] He didn't say arrested, but something to that. [12:10.000 --> 12:17.000] And he was giving the indication that if I spoke anymore that he was going to. [12:17.000 --> 12:19.000] So I let it go. [12:19.000 --> 12:24.000] So isn't this, haven't you already disqualified this judge and he just, [12:24.000 --> 12:26.000] he's not having it? [12:26.000 --> 12:31.000] I mean, why are you in there playing pancake with him? [12:31.000 --> 12:33.000] Well, let me tell you what's happened. [12:33.000 --> 12:35.000] They set a trial date. [12:35.000 --> 12:44.000] So after seven years and eight months, the trial date is set for September, [12:44.000 --> 12:50.000] third week of September, and so we're going to go to court on that day, [12:50.000 --> 13:00.000] and the arrest and charges will have last seven years, eight months, [13:00.000 --> 13:04.000] seven years, eight months from the time of arrest and charges, [13:04.000 --> 13:09.000] and they're going to go to trial. [13:09.000 --> 13:16.000] And so, yeah, what Randy said earlier tonight, I need help getting this to the Fed. [13:16.000 --> 13:20.000] I'll do the work, but I need direction on what work needs to be done. [13:20.000 --> 13:23.000] We talked about this about a month ago. [13:23.000 --> 13:27.000] Also, why haven't I done anything since that court date? [13:27.000 --> 13:33.000] Because I have family matter with my mom. [13:33.000 --> 13:41.000] I just spent 16 days with her, and I just drove back to San Jose last night, [13:41.000 --> 13:45.000] a 700-mile, 14-hour drive. [13:45.000 --> 13:56.000] So I'm back here, and I'm ready to get to work, and I'm mad as hell. [13:56.000 --> 13:59.000] This is beyond outrageous. [13:59.000 --> 14:09.000] It's torture, and I did get some things out in the court. [14:09.000 --> 14:12.000] You know, even though the judge was shutting me down, [14:12.000 --> 14:15.000] but the important thing would have been to say, [14:15.000 --> 14:18.000] hey, you forced this lawyer against my will on me. [14:18.000 --> 14:20.000] Where is he? [14:20.000 --> 14:27.000] And I wish to hell I would have said it, but they would, you know, look, [14:27.000 --> 14:31.000] when you're in court, I do pretty darn good most of the time, [14:31.000 --> 14:38.000] and I probably shouldn't be so hard because it's one of those things [14:38.000 --> 14:43.000] that you just have to have a feel for it, a feel for what you can get away with. [14:43.000 --> 14:46.000] And when you could, the whole time you're there, [14:46.000 --> 14:50.000] you're speaking to get things on the record. [14:50.000 --> 14:54.000] That's at least I am, and that's what people need to understand. [14:54.000 --> 15:00.000] And then earlier on tonight, I don't know if there's one or two calls here tonight. [15:00.000 --> 15:05.000] Look, nobody cares about your case more than you do. [15:05.000 --> 15:08.000] Even if you're a millionaire and you hire a lawyer, [15:08.000 --> 15:14.000] if you're going to win your cause in court, you're still going to do most of the work. [15:14.000 --> 15:19.000] I still hear this mentality from people that they think that they get a lawyer, [15:19.000 --> 15:26.000] and they dump it all in the lawyer's lap, and the lawyer will fix it. [15:26.000 --> 15:30.000] Well, folks, that ain't going to happen. [15:30.000 --> 15:32.000] You better roll up your sleeves. [15:32.000 --> 15:33.000] You better teach yourself. [15:33.000 --> 15:41.000] You better learn how to get it done because you're the one that's going to have to get in there [15:41.000 --> 15:44.000] and take the punches and give the punches. [15:44.000 --> 15:45.000] Yeah, I agree. [15:45.000 --> 15:49.000] Even if you hire a lawyer, you need to know what the lawyer is supposed to do [15:49.000 --> 15:54.000] so that you can put a ring in his nose and make him do what he's required to do. [15:54.000 --> 15:59.000] Otherwise, he's going to take the easy way out and just make it drag on and on, [15:59.000 --> 16:05.000] turn the case, milk it, get a lot of money out of both sides, [16:05.000 --> 16:11.000] and work out some kind of deal. [16:11.000 --> 16:17.000] So like the warranty, car warranty issue, that's a file of small claims action, [16:17.000 --> 16:20.000] but they have to understand who's their contract with. [16:20.000 --> 16:26.000] That's who they need to serve, or they have an agent for service for that corporation [16:26.000 --> 16:28.000] or limited liability company. [16:28.000 --> 16:35.000] You've got to look at the warranty and see if it's in fact what's covered and what's not covered. [16:35.000 --> 16:43.000] And then the guy with the federal...I won't run off the cliff if you help me with your breath. [16:43.000 --> 16:49.000] All right, you've got 12 seconds. [16:49.000 --> 16:51.000] Let's give out the call-in number. [16:51.000 --> 16:56.000] It's 512-646-1984. [16:56.000 --> 17:00.000] 512-646-1984. [17:00.000 --> 17:05.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [17:05.000 --> 17:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [17:09.000 --> 17:13.000] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, [17:13.000 --> 17:15.000] and now you can win two. [17:15.000 --> 17:19.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court [17:19.000 --> 17:21.000] using federal civil rights statutes, [17:21.000 --> 17:24.000] what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, [17:24.000 --> 17:26.000] how to answer letters and phone calls, [17:26.000 --> 17:29.000] how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, [17:29.000 --> 17:34.000] how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [17:34.000 --> 17:39.000] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [17:39.000 --> 17:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [17:41.000 --> 17:44.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com [17:44.000 --> 17:49.000] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [17:49.000 --> 17:57.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com [17:57.000 --> 18:02.000] to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [18:02.000 --> 18:05.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [18:05.000 --> 18:07.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, [18:07.000 --> 18:09.000] and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, [18:09.000 --> 18:12.000] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [18:12.000 --> 18:15.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [18:15.000 --> 18:17.000] the right to act in our own private capacity, [18:17.000 --> 18:19.000] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [18:19.000 --> 18:23.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce [18:23.000 --> 18:25.000] and preserve our rights through due process. [18:25.000 --> 18:28.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [18:28.000 --> 18:31.000] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [18:31.000 --> 18:33.000] that will help you understand what due process is [18:33.000 --> 18:35.000] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [18:35.000 --> 18:37.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material [18:37.000 --> 18:40.000] by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [18:40.000 --> 18:42.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, [18:42.000 --> 18:45.000] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [18:45.000 --> 18:47.000] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [18:47.000 --> 18:50.000] hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [18:50.000 --> 18:54.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [18:54.000 --> 18:58.000] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [19:20.000 --> 19:21.000] Okay, we are back. [19:21.000 --> 19:24.000] This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton. [19:24.000 --> 19:25.000] I'm Brett Fountain. [19:25.000 --> 19:28.000] On this Friday, the 8th of July, 2022, [19:28.000 --> 19:32.000] and we are talking with Ted in California right now. [19:32.000 --> 19:37.000] And I see that our whole color board has filled up, [19:37.000 --> 19:40.000] and we'll be getting to everybody here. [19:40.000 --> 19:44.000] But Ted, yeah, you were saying that some of these people, [19:44.000 --> 19:47.000] I totally agree with you, that some of these people feel like [19:47.000 --> 19:50.000] that somebody's going to be able to pick it up and run with it, [19:50.000 --> 19:57.000] and it's not like when you call a plumber or you call somebody that this is their business [19:57.000 --> 20:00.000] and you don't really have to know their business. [20:00.000 --> 20:01.000] I agree. [20:01.000 --> 20:05.000] This is something that you do need to stay right on top of, [20:05.000 --> 20:10.000] and nobody cares about your rights more than you do. [20:10.000 --> 20:16.000] So what about your federal angle? [20:16.000 --> 20:19.000] I know you're trying to get into the Fed, or you have been trying to. [20:19.000 --> 20:22.000] What's going on with that? [20:22.000 --> 20:27.000] Well, the last we talked more than a month ago, Randy, [20:27.000 --> 20:33.000] on the show, Randy said he'd help me out with that, [20:33.000 --> 20:38.000] and I still need help with going to the Fed. [20:38.000 --> 20:44.000] Now, what I see as the process, to even before that point, [20:44.000 --> 20:50.000] is right now I need to do a motion. [20:50.000 --> 20:52.000] I forgot the name of it. [20:52.000 --> 20:58.000] Give me a second here. [20:58.000 --> 21:07.000] It's a Serena or Serna motion, and it's about time statutes. [21:07.000 --> 21:12.000] You know, I think I need to file it into the case, let them deny it, [21:12.000 --> 21:17.000] and I take it to the sixth court of appeals after that. [21:17.000 --> 21:26.000] Because remember, the wives of these male judges that are scoundrels, [21:26.000 --> 21:29.000] those wives sit on the sixth district. [21:29.000 --> 21:35.000] Remember, I explained in the past about how it's pretty sick. [21:35.000 --> 21:38.000] It shouldn't be allowed. [21:38.000 --> 21:42.000] You know, you have a problem with Judge Mnuchin down in the Superior Court, [21:42.000 --> 21:49.000] and you appeal him, and you end up with his wife at the sixth district court of appeals. [21:49.000 --> 21:55.000] And then you have Judge Greenwood, who is the wife of Judge Davila, [21:55.000 --> 21:59.000] who's over in the federal court. [21:59.000 --> 22:03.000] Oh, there's no conflict of interest there. [22:03.000 --> 22:05.000] It's horrible. [22:05.000 --> 22:11.000] But anyway, when something happens with you legally, [22:11.000 --> 22:18.000] the first thing is you grab a notebook and put date, time, and then it's who, what, where, when. [22:18.000 --> 22:23.000] And the reason is you've got to have your timeline. [22:23.000 --> 22:26.000] Randy always talks about a timeline. [22:26.000 --> 22:28.000] So you have to have your timeline. [22:28.000 --> 22:31.000] Every time that person called about this warranty thing, [22:31.000 --> 22:34.000] they need to write the date, time, what was said. [22:34.000 --> 22:37.000] You've got to start your log immediately. [22:37.000 --> 22:46.000] Don't wait because it gets to where they all get balled up, and your emotions are flailing, [22:46.000 --> 22:51.000] and you come on a radio show, and you start talking in the middle and go to the end [22:51.000 --> 22:54.000] and then say something about the beginning. [22:54.000 --> 22:59.000] And you know, you've got to have your timeline [22:59.000 --> 23:04.000] because it's all going to play into if you have to write a lawsuit, okay? [23:04.000 --> 23:08.000] Now, when it comes to the lawyer part, yeah, you hire a lawyer, [23:08.000 --> 23:12.000] but the people that win, they hire the best lawyers and they pay them. [23:12.000 --> 23:16.000] But they're constantly asking the lawyer, what do we do now? [23:16.000 --> 23:17.000] What are the next steps? [23:17.000 --> 23:20.000] You want to know what the next five steps are. [23:20.000 --> 23:25.000] And that's how you're going to have a chance to win your case. [23:25.000 --> 23:30.000] And if you're going to fight for yourself, then you're going to have to do it better than the lawyers do, [23:30.000 --> 23:34.000] and you're going to have to learn things because they hold, believe it or not, [23:34.000 --> 23:38.000] they hold proceeds to a higher standard than the lawyers. [23:38.000 --> 23:40.000] Oh, yeah. [23:40.000 --> 23:45.000] I told the judge one time, he said something about, [23:45.000 --> 23:50.000] I'm going to be held to the same standards as lawyers. [23:50.000 --> 24:02.000] And I said, Your Honor, I only hope that you will hold the lawyers to the same high standards that you hold a pro se. [24:02.000 --> 24:04.000] Yeah. [24:04.000 --> 24:07.000] I do have another quick thing. [24:07.000 --> 24:11.000] This is not about my issues. [24:11.000 --> 24:13.000] I listened in on a motion hearing. [24:13.000 --> 24:16.000] This girlfriend of mine got a DUI a year ago. [24:16.000 --> 24:19.000] They've been running her through the mill. [24:19.000 --> 24:21.000] She was under the limit. [24:21.000 --> 24:24.000] And I won't get into all the nonsense. [24:24.000 --> 24:26.000] It was the California Highway Patrol. [24:26.000 --> 24:32.000] But this is really pretty sick, and it goes back to how corrupt the whole system is. [24:32.000 --> 24:36.000] So there was a motion hearing, and she asked me for support. [24:36.000 --> 24:44.000] And as I've been telling people right now, you can call into these courts, and you can listen, and you can learn so much. [24:44.000 --> 24:53.000] And so I called and listened, but this was like no other motion I've ever been involved in because it went on for five hours. [24:53.000 --> 25:01.000] And it turned out that the DA brought the two police officers, the two highway patrolmen, to testify at this motion hearing. [25:01.000 --> 25:04.000] This was a motion to suppress evidence. [25:04.000 --> 25:06.000] But here's the sick part. [25:06.000 --> 25:19.000] The second highway patrolman got up, and then the first one was on the witness stand questioned by the DA, cross-examined. [25:19.000 --> 25:24.000] Then they brought up the second one, the officer who's credited for the arrest. [25:24.000 --> 25:38.000] And on cross-examination, he started talking about his experience, and he said he had 50 to 100 DUIs under his belt and all this. [25:38.000 --> 25:44.000] Well, then 20 minutes later, he's still under cross-examination. [25:44.000 --> 25:54.000] It comes out that this was his first DUI arrest and that all the others were practiced at the Academy. [25:54.000 --> 26:00.000] So I'm texting the girl, telling her, you tell your lawyer to impeach that witness. [26:00.000 --> 26:02.000] Right now, this case is over. [26:02.000 --> 26:06.000] He just committed perjury on the witness stand. [26:06.000 --> 26:13.000] He misled the court as to his experience. [26:13.000 --> 26:15.000] It doesn't matter which one's true. [26:15.000 --> 26:20.000] If they're impossibly inconsistent, then he's a perjurer. [26:20.000 --> 26:26.000] And it doesn't really matter which one's true or if neither one is true. [26:26.000 --> 26:30.000] Well, that's the thing, but here's where it really gets sick. [26:30.000 --> 26:35.000] This lawyer of hers won't even order the transcript. [26:35.000 --> 26:43.000] And she told him outside the courthouse that, you know, you can impeach him. [26:43.000 --> 26:49.000] And the lawyer says, I'm not going to call the police officer a liar. [26:49.000 --> 26:51.000] So then you bar-grieve the lawyer. [26:51.000 --> 26:52.000] I have to call him. [26:52.000 --> 27:01.000] Bar-grieve the lawyer one time for not being willing to impeach a witness who obviously needs to be impeached for perjury. [27:01.000 --> 27:05.000] Just bald-faced lying right there, there's no two ways about it. [27:05.000 --> 27:12.000] And then bar-grieve the lawyer again for not being willing to get that transcript. [27:12.000 --> 27:15.000] That's two of them right there, really easy. [27:15.000 --> 27:23.000] The lawyer will begin to think twice about whether he wants to, you know, stick by his, you know, [27:23.000 --> 27:25.000] support the blue line or whatever he's got in his mind. [27:25.000 --> 27:29.000] He doesn't have the same agenda as she does. [27:29.000 --> 27:33.000] Okay. So here's the point I want to make for everyone. [27:33.000 --> 27:38.000] If we had good judges, the judge would have dismissed the case. [27:38.000 --> 27:49.000] The judge would have stopped it right when that revelation came out that 20 minutes earlier that this California high patrolman had lied. [27:49.000 --> 27:54.000] And in fact, he wasn't even, he was still under, he was brand new. [27:54.000 --> 27:59.000] What do they call that when they're still under, like an internship? [27:59.000 --> 28:04.000] But look, that's not the judge's job. [28:04.000 --> 28:11.000] It's the party's job to ask the court to do something about whatever's going on. [28:11.000 --> 28:19.000] Yes, the judge could, on his own motion, suesponte they call it, the judge can do certain things. [28:19.000 --> 28:25.000] But it's not the judge's job to take sides and go, oh, see that, oh, oh, no, oh. [28:25.000 --> 28:30.000] The judge is supposed to be neutral and act on the motions that are brought to him. [28:30.000 --> 28:38.000] When somebody moves the court to do something or objects to some motion in the direction that the court is taking, [28:38.000 --> 28:42.000] then the judge gets to weigh in on that and say, yep, exactly right. [28:42.000 --> 28:47.000] I was just thinking the same thing and hoping somebody would say that. [28:47.000 --> 28:50.000] You know, it's the people's job. [28:50.000 --> 28:52.000] It's the party's job. [28:52.000 --> 28:57.000] I don't think that's, you can't get upset with the judge for not jumping in the middle of that. [28:57.000 --> 29:01.000] Well, but I have a similar situation. [29:01.000 --> 29:09.000] Remember in my traffic ticket, the judge saw that the cop was going to perjure himself or was perjuring himself. [29:09.000 --> 29:19.000] So the judge said, stop my cross-examination and said that we have to come back another day because the court's closing. [29:19.000 --> 29:21.000] It was like 3 20 p.m. [29:21.000 --> 29:29.000] And it was the judge shielding this deputy from further perjuring himself. [29:29.000 --> 29:35.000] That guy's going to need to get a little bit of schooling before he gets back up on the stand. [29:35.000 --> 29:41.000] He's going to make us all look bad, kill our revenue stream, right? [29:41.000 --> 29:43.000] Exactly right. [29:43.000 --> 29:45.000] Well, we're about to go to our sponsors. [29:45.000 --> 29:49.000] I do have a suggestion for you about your federal stuff. [29:49.000 --> 29:55.000] And I guess we'll talk about that more when we get back on the other side. [29:55.000 --> 29:58.000] This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton, Brat Fountain. [29:58.000 --> 30:01.000] We'll be right back. [30:01.000 --> 30:08.000] Everyone knows that walking is great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk could predict how long you're going to live. [30:08.000 --> 30:14.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you more about walking prognostication in just a moment. [30:14.000 --> 30:16.000] Privacy is under attack. [30:16.000 --> 30:20.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:20.000 --> 30:24.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [30:24.000 --> 30:26.000] So protect your rights. [30:26.000 --> 30:30.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:30.000 --> 30:32.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:32.000 --> 30:40.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:40.000 --> 30:43.000] Start over with StartPage. [30:43.000 --> 30:48.000] New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live. [30:48.000 --> 30:56.000] The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter per second or faster live longer than expected. [30:56.000 --> 31:00.000] If you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour. [31:00.000 --> 31:07.000] A senior's age, gender, and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures. [31:07.000 --> 31:10.000] Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer. [31:10.000 --> 31:13.000] Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive. [31:13.000 --> 31:16.000] It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk, and a few minutes. [31:16.000 --> 31:21.000] Researchers say it could help doctors identify older patients who need special care. [31:21.000 --> 31:30.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:30.000 --> 31:31.000] I lost my son. [31:31.000 --> 31:32.000] My nephew. [31:32.000 --> 31:33.000] My uncle. [31:33.000 --> 31:34.000] My son. [31:34.000 --> 31:35.000] On September 11, 2001. [31:35.000 --> 31:38.000] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11. [31:38.000 --> 31:43.000] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. [31:43.000 --> 31:46.000] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7. [31:46.000 --> 31:52.000] Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story. [31:52.000 --> 31:55.000] Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. [31:55.000 --> 31:57.000] Go to buildingwhat.org. [31:57.000 --> 32:01.000] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [32:01.000 --> 32:06.000] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word? [32:06.000 --> 32:12.000] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk, [32:12.000 --> 32:17.000] where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [32:17.000 --> 32:24.000] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth. [32:24.000 --> 32:28.000] Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, [32:28.000 --> 32:32.000] where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [32:32.000 --> 32:39.000] Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development. [32:39.000 --> 32:44.000] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [32:44.000 --> 32:50.000] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [32:50.000 --> 32:56.000] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. [32:56.000 --> 33:11.000] to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [33:26.000 --> 33:41.000] Okay, we are back. This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton, I'm Brat Fountain, and we're talking with Ted in California. [33:41.000 --> 33:51.000] Ted, when we went out, we were talking about, well, I was just going to mention something to you about your federal, I have a suggestion. [33:51.000 --> 33:58.000] I know while you're working yourself, while you're working your way up to being able to bring a federal lawsuit, [33:58.000 --> 34:07.000] I will just mention it's really fast and easy to do a criminal complaint. [34:07.000 --> 34:24.000] And if you go to uscourts.gov, it's plural, U-S-C-O-U-R-T-S dot G-O-V, the document code is A-O-9-1. [34:24.000 --> 34:27.000] But I think you find that, let's see here. [34:27.000 --> 34:34.000] Yeah, it has a place on the main map that says services and forms, and then right underneath there is criminal complaint. [34:34.000 --> 34:40.000] And it's just a very simple document. You don't have to put a bunch of attachments. [34:40.000 --> 34:49.000] You can just, you can even do a fill in, a fillable PDF, and fact it in, it's very easy. [34:49.000 --> 34:58.000] So it's not nearly as involved. You don't have to think about the, you know, well, which cause of action am I going to pick? [34:58.000 --> 35:15.000] And do I have all of the case law that I need to support every little piece of, you know, it can get involved with a lawsuit. [35:15.000 --> 35:21.000] It can be simple, but yours is probably not going to be. [35:21.000 --> 35:29.000] So I would suggest you consider criminal complaint as a way to go ahead and at least get started on that. [35:29.000 --> 35:45.000] Well, I really appreciate that source. So uscourts.gov, you believe that the form number is A-0-9-1, and it's a criminal complaint. [35:45.000 --> 35:51.000] Yes, it's A-0, the letter O, 91. [35:51.000 --> 35:55.000] Okay. My criminal complaints are actually pretty simple. [35:55.000 --> 36:00.000] The judges are bribed by the county. They're accepting money from the county. [36:00.000 --> 36:08.000] The county is not their employer. Therefore, they're disqualified from hearing the cases, any civil or criminal cases. [36:08.000 --> 36:18.000] And in fact, I brought all this up, and I just recently learned that the county has shut it all down, how they were paying them. [36:18.000 --> 36:21.000] I suspect they're still paying them, but they now- [36:21.000 --> 36:25.000] Oh, yeah. That sounds like another secret route. [36:25.000 --> 36:31.000] Right. They now claim when you make the FOIA request that they've severed all ties with the court. [36:31.000 --> 36:35.000] But here's the thing. What do you mean you've now severed all ties with the court? [36:35.000 --> 36:43.000] That's an admission that what you were doing was wrong. And it's actually simple to put in here. [36:43.000 --> 36:53.000] It's under frauds and swindles. It's what was used, and I think it's 1481. It's coming with, in any case- [36:53.000 --> 36:55.000] 1341, yeah. [36:55.000 --> 37:05.000] 1341, frauds and swindles, and what's it called? Good faith services or whatever. [37:05.000 --> 37:11.000] So to do frauds and swindles, you have to first show that there's fraud, because it's mail fraud, [37:11.000 --> 37:17.000] and you want to show that the fraud scheme is being carried out using the mail. [37:17.000 --> 37:25.000] So the mail is just going to be one more essential element that you add on to fraud. [37:25.000 --> 37:30.000] And frauds normally got nine elements. So you'll step down through those, [37:30.000 --> 37:39.000] make at least one statement of fact for each, and then tack on the end, and they did it through the mail. [37:39.000 --> 37:50.000] Well, don't forget, in past, we went the whole route, and we perfected Randy's system of you mail [37:50.000 --> 37:57.000] to the foreman of the criminal grand jury, and the address is the DA's office. [37:57.000 --> 38:05.000] And the DA opened my stuff and actually wrote a letter telling me that I couldn't contact the DA. [38:05.000 --> 38:13.000] Now, when you write this, you also put a self-addressed AMP envelope in there with one sheet of paper [38:13.000 --> 38:21.000] that is just for the foreman to check off that he received whatever you mailed them. [38:21.000 --> 38:26.000] Right. Well, that's a pattern. That whole path and pattern is for setting them up [38:26.000 --> 38:32.000] so that you get lots of people involved in the crime of doing nothing. [38:32.000 --> 38:34.000] That's what that's all about. [38:34.000 --> 38:38.000] You know they're going to do nothing, and so instead of being frustrated that they do nothing, [38:38.000 --> 38:43.000] you get them all balled up in their criminal doing nothing. [38:43.000 --> 38:52.000] But in this case, you're trying to reach out to the feds who, as Randy says, [38:52.000 --> 38:56.000] they have their schnauz in a different trough. [38:56.000 --> 39:02.000] So if you're going to say mail fraud, then look at the nine elements of fraud. [39:02.000 --> 39:06.000] Number one, a representation of a fact. [39:06.000 --> 39:09.000] So they represented something. [39:09.000 --> 39:11.000] Perhaps you would like to go for their oath of office. [39:11.000 --> 39:16.000] So you say they represented to the public that they were going to follow their oath of office. [39:16.000 --> 39:19.000] Two, its falsity. [39:19.000 --> 39:22.000] Three, its materiality. [39:22.000 --> 39:28.000] Four, the representer's knowledge of its falsity or ignorance of its truth. [39:28.000 --> 39:34.000] Five, the representer's intent that it should be acted upon by the person [39:34.000 --> 39:37.000] in the manner reasonably contemplated. [39:37.000 --> 39:43.000] So they intended that people should trust them and the people should put their trust in that oath of office. [39:43.000 --> 39:52.000] Well, six, the injured party, the people, you, the injured party's ignorance of its falsity. [39:52.000 --> 39:56.000] We didn't know that he was breaking the law. [39:56.000 --> 39:59.000] We thought he was upholding his oath of office. [39:59.000 --> 40:03.000] Number seven, the injured party's reliance on its truth. [40:03.000 --> 40:07.000] Eight, the injured party's right to rely on that. [40:07.000 --> 40:12.000] Nine, the injured party's consequent and proximate injury. [40:12.000 --> 40:16.000] So then you need to make a statement of fact that says how you're harmed by that. [40:16.000 --> 40:23.000] When you list out those nine, you just make simple bullet points and you can list out what happened. [40:23.000 --> 40:26.000] And here are the facts. [40:26.000 --> 40:30.000] And when you state that he did all of these, now you've got fraud. [40:30.000 --> 40:34.000] And then you add a tenth one on there, and he sent this in the mail. [40:34.000 --> 40:37.000] Now you've got mail fraud. [40:37.000 --> 40:42.000] Title 18, USC 1341, you were talking about. [40:42.000 --> 40:48.000] Just put those ten bullet points in there on your criminal complaint. [40:48.000 --> 40:52.000] Now, when you fill out their form, they're not going to have a place for you to put much. [40:52.000 --> 40:54.000] You're going to be really cramped for space. [40:54.000 --> 40:59.000] So if you want, you can just put in there, see attached sheet for details, [40:59.000 --> 41:04.000] and make a page two that has these things on there. [41:04.000 --> 41:10.000] But yeah, it's really very simple and it's not involved in, [41:10.000 --> 41:14.000] not to the level that it would be for having to write a suit and have service and summons [41:14.000 --> 41:18.000] and waiver of service and paying process service and all of that. [41:18.000 --> 41:19.000] There's none of that. [41:19.000 --> 41:22.000] You don't have any complication. [41:22.000 --> 41:27.000] You write your one-page document, you hit send, and it's over. [41:27.000 --> 41:30.000] You've just lobbed a grenade. [41:30.000 --> 41:34.000] Done. [41:34.000 --> 41:36.000] Got it. [41:36.000 --> 41:41.000] Okay, Bob, all for tonight because I've got a lot of work. [41:41.000 --> 41:46.000] Thank you so much, Brett, because that source, [41:46.000 --> 41:51.000] I just needed a starting point and then I'll run with it. [41:51.000 --> 41:52.000] Okay, great. [41:52.000 --> 41:54.000] Well, I'll look forward to hearing. [41:54.000 --> 41:56.000] Maybe next week you'll have some, [41:56.000 --> 42:00.000] you'll report back and see what's going on with that. [42:00.000 --> 42:01.000] Thank you so much. [42:01.000 --> 42:03.000] Yeah, thanks for calling. [42:03.000 --> 42:08.000] Okay, and now we're going to go to a first-time caller in Maine. [42:08.000 --> 42:10.000] Hello, Amy. [42:10.000 --> 42:15.000] What's on your mind this evening? [42:15.000 --> 42:18.000] Hello, Amy. [42:18.000 --> 42:19.000] Are you there? [42:19.000 --> 42:20.000] Are you muted? [42:20.000 --> 42:21.000] Can you hear me? [42:21.000 --> 42:22.000] Hi, Brett. [42:22.000 --> 42:24.000] Hey, there you are. [42:24.000 --> 42:25.000] I had mute on, of course. [42:25.000 --> 42:27.000] It's always something. [42:27.000 --> 42:28.000] No worries. [42:28.000 --> 42:29.000] Glad you're with us. [42:29.000 --> 42:30.000] Thanks for taking my call. [42:30.000 --> 42:31.000] Yeah. [42:31.000 --> 42:36.000] So, long-time listener, you, Alphonse, all these guys. [42:36.000 --> 42:40.000] For two and a half years, I've done this endlessly. [42:40.000 --> 42:42.000] I was one of those hero-to-zero workers, [42:42.000 --> 42:46.000] so I had nothing to do while I got fired for not taking the jab [42:46.000 --> 42:48.000] after working in the emergency room. [42:48.000 --> 42:50.000] Oh, boy. [42:50.000 --> 42:51.000] So, yeah, I hit it. [42:51.000 --> 42:52.000] I hate that. [42:52.000 --> 42:57.000] So, God's also thrown in a lot of lessons for me. [42:57.000 --> 43:00.000] And I'm winning, though, 11-0, right? [43:00.000 --> 43:03.000] 11-0 with these, I have no criminal record. [43:03.000 --> 43:05.000] I never had an honorable veteran. [43:05.000 --> 43:09.000] I was like, this is crazy that God's throwing all these crazy things at me. [43:09.000 --> 43:13.000] But my question is, I just wanted to give you a little background. [43:13.000 --> 43:15.000] That's just a little piece. [43:15.000 --> 43:22.000] But my question is, all right, so when it comes to FOIA requests, right? [43:22.000 --> 43:28.000] So, say, around here, there is zero transparency, [43:28.000 --> 43:32.000] zero integrity, honestly, in my county. [43:32.000 --> 43:34.000] A friend of mine is a sheriff in a different county. [43:34.000 --> 43:36.000] It's a whole other world. [43:36.000 --> 43:39.000] I do realize now the importance of the county. [43:39.000 --> 43:45.000] But if they won't be transparent and you already go to the ombudsman, [43:45.000 --> 43:46.000] what's the next step? [43:46.000 --> 43:48.000] Is it honestly to go to kangaroo court? [43:48.000 --> 43:51.000] Because I don't see that as being very effective. [43:51.000 --> 43:52.000] No. [43:52.000 --> 43:53.000] Okay, so that's a great question. [43:53.000 --> 43:55.000] And we're about to go to our sponsors. [43:55.000 --> 43:58.000] So I'll pick that up on the other side. [43:58.000 --> 43:59.000] Thanks. [43:59.000 --> 44:06.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition. [44:06.000 --> 44:09.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. [44:09.000 --> 44:11.000] And it's time we changed all that. [44:11.000 --> 44:17.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [44:17.000 --> 44:22.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, [44:22.000 --> 44:25.000] young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [44:25.000 --> 44:31.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [44:31.000 --> 44:34.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, [44:34.000 --> 44:39.000] we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [44:39.000 --> 44:43.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, [44:43.000 --> 44:47.000] your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [44:47.000 --> 44:51.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [44:51.000 --> 44:58.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [44:58.000 --> 45:00.000] Order now. [45:00.000 --> 45:03.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:03.000 --> 45:07.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, [45:07.000 --> 45:15.000] the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [45:15.000 --> 45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:23.000 --> 45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [45:28.000 --> 45:34.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [45:34.000 --> 45:39.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [45:39.000 --> 45:43.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:43.000 --> 45:48.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, [45:48.000 --> 45:52.000] forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.000 --> 46:19.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [46:19.000 --> 46:39.000] Okay, we are back. [46:39.000 --> 46:41.000] This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Shelton. [46:41.000 --> 46:46.000] I'm Brett Fountain, and we are talking with Amy in Maine. [46:46.000 --> 46:53.000] Amy, thanks for your patience, and yes, you had a really great question, record requests. [46:53.000 --> 46:57.000] Yeah, FOIA is what we call it if it's federal. [46:57.000 --> 47:03.000] If you're asking for public records from the feds, then it's called FOIA. [47:03.000 --> 47:14.000] And in some states, different states have different acts that the legislature has passed to mandate transparency. [47:14.000 --> 47:18.000] And like you said, if they're not being transparent, what do you do? [47:18.000 --> 47:20.000] Well, take a look. [47:20.000 --> 47:25.000] Sure, what I also do is I put, I quote, and tell me if this is wrong. [47:25.000 --> 47:31.000] I just throw a horse blanket on it because I don't know who's a subsidiary, a corporate, whatever, agency of this. [47:31.000 --> 47:36.000] I put the state, which is in Maine, it's the Freedom of Access Act as amended, [47:36.000 --> 47:41.000] and then I just slash freedom of, is that, like, does that just cover everything? [47:41.000 --> 47:47.000] I thought it was, like, pretty decent advice for people because who knows which one we're supposed to be going under. [47:47.000 --> 47:49.000] Well, in Maine, so yeah, you're right. [47:49.000 --> 47:57.000] In Maine, they call it the Freedom of Access Act, but the thing is it may be in each state. [47:57.000 --> 48:04.000] It's separate for each state, but you'll get familiar with that Freedom of Access Act, [48:04.000 --> 48:13.000] and take a look specifically at what they are required to give you and what they are not required to give you, [48:13.000 --> 48:16.000] and take a look at who it is that's responsible. [48:16.000 --> 48:26.000] I think you'll find that it is generally the elected official or the appointed official or the head of a department, [48:26.000 --> 48:31.000] and everybody else is just there, you know, they're hired to help out, whatever, [48:31.000 --> 48:38.000] but you know, you get somebody, a high school girl is there, she's there part-time helping out with the records request, [48:38.000 --> 48:39.000] but it's not really her job. [48:39.000 --> 48:43.000] She is not, you didn't hire her. [48:43.000 --> 48:46.000] The people of Maine didn't hire her. [48:46.000 --> 48:51.000] The people of Maine elected somebody who has that duty imposed by law. [48:51.000 --> 48:56.000] Sure, so I'm actually, well, I'm in the smallest city in the country, so I have a mayor. [48:56.000 --> 49:03.000] So if the little police department, there's like three cops, and the town manager, they're being ridiculous, [49:03.000 --> 49:07.000] like they're absurd, so could I go to the mayor? [49:07.000 --> 49:10.000] I already have his oath. [49:10.000 --> 49:13.000] Yes, yes, you can hold the mayor accountable, for sure. [49:13.000 --> 49:25.000] So you can ask for things that, well, what I like to do is reach out and ask for something [49:25.000 --> 49:30.000] that they don't want to give me, but something that's obviously public, [49:30.000 --> 49:35.000] like I go into the court, and I want to know what's your facts number. [49:35.000 --> 49:37.000] Well, they only want to give that to lawyers. [49:37.000 --> 49:44.000] They don't want to give it to me, but I bought it for them. [49:44.000 --> 49:47.000] So they have to tell me, and when they don't, they're in trouble. [49:47.000 --> 49:52.000] So take a look at your Freedom of Access Act and find out, [49:52.000 --> 49:58.000] probably you're going to find out that it is a criminal statute, not civil. [49:58.000 --> 50:05.000] Whoever are the people who are required to respond and don't respond are going to be guilty [50:05.000 --> 50:13.000] of your state's version of official oppression, official misconduct, malfeasance. [50:13.000 --> 50:22.000] They play such games, like word magic. It's absurd. [50:22.000 --> 50:26.000] But I got kind of good at it over the last two years, so I really keep it simple, [50:26.000 --> 50:31.000] and then I trigger in on a word, and then I looked up all you guys, [50:31.000 --> 50:35.000] all other people have kind of paved the way, and I made it my own, [50:35.000 --> 50:42.000] take it little bits and pieces, and eventually they don't respond at all. [50:42.000 --> 50:46.000] After like three messages, they say, no responsive documents. [50:46.000 --> 50:52.000] And then I reply, well, I need clarification. Thank you. Kindly reply with... [50:52.000 --> 50:59.000] And then they'll reply with another snarky, and then when I pin them in a corner, cricket. [50:59.000 --> 51:05.000] And then I go to the ombudsman, who will schedule a meeting, but then she says, [51:05.000 --> 51:09.000] well, I don't have the authority to make them. I can make suggestions. [51:09.000 --> 51:12.000] So I'm like, all right, well, that's not a remedy. [51:12.000 --> 51:17.000] You don't need to be talking to that person at all. In Texas, it's the attorney general. [51:17.000 --> 51:20.000] So you might check and see if Maine has something similar, [51:20.000 --> 51:30.000] where the attorney general has the authority to initiate a criminal case based on my complaint. [51:30.000 --> 51:36.000] So what I do is one of my public officials decides that they didn't have time to answer me, [51:36.000 --> 51:43.000] and it happened this morning. So last night, 5 p.m. was the end of someone's deadline. [51:43.000 --> 51:49.000] They had a records request. They had to respond to me by 4.59 last night, 5 p.m., too late. [51:49.000 --> 51:55.000] So she answers me this morning, and she says, oh, we don't do that. [51:55.000 --> 51:58.000] You're going to have to contact some other department. [51:58.000 --> 52:04.000] So she waited, like two and a half weeks, she waited to tell me this. [52:04.000 --> 52:10.000] She could have told me the very next morning, you know, and everything would have been fine. [52:10.000 --> 52:15.000] But no, she waited, you know, given that she had July 4, she got to stretch it out [52:15.000 --> 52:22.000] and spread it over three weekends, and boom, now she's way down the line and too late. [52:22.000 --> 52:26.000] Well, as of this morning, she has committed a crime. [52:26.000 --> 52:32.000] So I'm going to the Texas attorney general with a criminal complaint with her name on it, [52:32.000 --> 52:36.000] and the attorney general is going to give her a spanking. [52:36.000 --> 52:42.000] I'm going to see, I've been through this before, I'm going to see a note from the attorney general to her, [52:42.000 --> 52:45.000] and I'm going to get copied on that. [52:45.000 --> 52:50.000] And the attorney general will be commanding her to, you know, not withhold the records. [52:50.000 --> 52:55.000] You have to release these, and then she's going to get, you know, cooperative. [52:55.000 --> 53:02.000] So how do you get those records, you request them at, or, you know, whatever your state code is, [53:02.000 --> 53:06.000] you request them in compliance with that? [53:06.000 --> 53:13.000] Yes. If there's any question in your mind, like you referenced a moment ago, [53:13.000 --> 53:17.000] maybe address a couple of different ones because you don't know which one's going to apply. [53:17.000 --> 53:24.000] Here's the deal, judicial records are going to go under a different mandate for transparency. [53:24.000 --> 53:30.000] So in Texas, we've got the judicial rules of administration have a rule 12 that says [53:30.000 --> 53:33.000] that they have to open up those records for you, [53:33.000 --> 53:39.000] but then those are not open records in the sense of a public information request. [53:39.000 --> 53:44.000] So we have section 552 for this and rule 12 for that. [53:44.000 --> 53:46.000] You don't need to say either one. [53:46.000 --> 53:51.000] Let them figure out which one it belongs to, or let them get it wrong and be in trouble for that. [53:51.000 --> 53:54.000] You're just asking for records. [53:54.000 --> 53:57.000] My ombudsman did hold them on that. [53:57.000 --> 54:01.000] She said, well, he said, well, I'm citing rule XYZ. [54:01.000 --> 54:04.000] And she said, well, because I had asked him to cite a rule. [54:04.000 --> 54:08.000] I said, if you cannot provide these, please cite specific rule, blah, blah, blah. [54:08.000 --> 54:10.000] And they decided not to. [54:10.000 --> 54:16.000] So that's all I got from that email was she forced him to cite the specific rule, [54:16.000 --> 54:22.000] which she just cited the course blanket again rule and not the specific tier down, [54:22.000 --> 54:24.000] like B12, whatever. [54:24.000 --> 54:26.000] He just cited rule 12, whatever. [54:26.000 --> 54:30.000] It was so ambiguous that I couldn't pin it down. [54:30.000 --> 54:36.000] These people are so difficult to, honestly, Brett, in Maine, [54:36.000 --> 54:40.000] it's been on the front page of the paper, our big papers, [54:40.000 --> 54:46.000] about this task force that put in employee requests to all of the law enforcement in Maine. [54:46.000 --> 54:52.000] And 80% of what they put out wasn't even responded to. [54:52.000 --> 54:55.000] And then the other ones, they weren't in compliance, XYZ. [54:55.000 --> 54:58.000] But where's these fines they're supposed to be getting? [54:58.000 --> 55:01.000] Who enforces those? [55:01.000 --> 55:02.000] Is that the AG? [55:02.000 --> 55:04.000] What do you mean the fines? [55:04.000 --> 55:10.000] I thought they had, like, they will suddenly get, I think in Maine, [55:10.000 --> 55:12.000] but you have to go do their court method. [55:12.000 --> 55:15.000] You have to go to the, literally the courier. [55:15.000 --> 55:22.000] I have heard that in Ohio, they have $100, I think it's $100 a pop. [55:22.000 --> 55:29.000] For every time that a records request didn't get responded properly, [55:29.000 --> 55:34.000] then the requester automatically is owed $100. [55:34.000 --> 55:39.000] And they do have to fill out some form or send it to somewhere in order to get that. [55:39.000 --> 55:42.000] But I thought that was really pretty cool. [55:42.000 --> 55:46.000] And I don't see anything like that in Texas. [55:46.000 --> 55:50.000] In Texas, the result is they just officially became a criminal. [55:50.000 --> 55:55.000] And so then I send off a criminal complaint to the attorney general, [55:55.000 --> 56:00.000] and the attorney general will get a hold of them and give them a good shaking, [56:00.000 --> 56:03.000] and then I'll get my records later. [56:03.000 --> 56:05.000] But I don't get any money out of that. [56:05.000 --> 56:08.000] There's no $100 bill coming my way like they have in Ohio. [56:08.000 --> 56:12.000] I'm not sure what Maine has for you there. [56:12.000 --> 56:17.000] Yeah, well, that's the point of these requests is I've been building a case for two, [56:17.000 --> 56:20.000] and I've been flowplaying these guys for a very long time. [56:20.000 --> 56:22.000] I'm kind of at the precipice. [56:22.000 --> 56:25.000] And they're in folk. They fired the officer. [56:25.000 --> 56:27.000] I've gotten two of them fired. [56:27.000 --> 56:33.000] I'm on my third prosecutor, and it's like a driving to endanger. [56:33.000 --> 56:38.000] Like, my jet ski got a flat tire, and I was pulled over, and somebody comes up, [56:38.000 --> 56:40.000] and he's like, I need you to blow in this device. [56:40.000 --> 56:46.000] So my friend blew, he pretended he was driving, and he blew in it.003 times. [56:46.000 --> 56:47.000] And then he's like, your turn. [56:47.000 --> 56:50.000] And I'm like, I don't think so. What's your probable cause? [56:50.000 --> 56:56.000] You know, I kind of knew my right point, but I didn't have the spiritual backing now. [56:56.000 --> 56:57.000] Oh, are you kidding me? [56:57.000 --> 57:02.000] I was pulled over in my boat two days ago, and the wardens ran away from me. [57:02.000 --> 57:04.000] I literally... [57:04.000 --> 57:08.000] You know, once you get that, you know what's right. [57:08.000 --> 57:12.000] And so do they, but they just don't know it in the conscious sense. [57:12.000 --> 57:15.000] So I like that. [57:15.000 --> 57:19.000] I'm going to see if it's criminal, because I haven't seen anything in Maine about criminal. [57:19.000 --> 57:20.000] And then I'll... [57:20.000 --> 57:24.000] Yeah, and take a look and see how many days do they have, or where is the line? [57:24.000 --> 57:27.000] How do you draw the line between what's responsive and not? [57:27.000 --> 57:30.000] In Texas, we have two levels of responsiveness. [57:30.000 --> 57:34.000] One says that they must answer promptly, and then it defines promptly. [57:34.000 --> 57:40.000] In case anybody was going to get confused, promptly means without any unnecessary delay. [57:40.000 --> 57:41.000] Sure. [57:41.000 --> 57:50.000] So I think about what are they going to do if they have a dozen suits show up in there from the Secret Service, [57:50.000 --> 57:55.000] and they're all swarming around in their offices saying, I need you to produce this and this and that and show me this. [57:55.000 --> 57:59.000] They're going to pull those records in a couple of minutes. [57:59.000 --> 58:00.000] Right. [58:00.000 --> 58:03.000] Not days, not weeks, minutes. [58:03.000 --> 58:07.000] So I set my expectation accordingly, and I tell them so. [58:07.000 --> 58:11.000] I say, I think that you can probably pull this in 15 minutes or less, [58:11.000 --> 58:16.000] so my expectation is that I'm going to hear back from you before lunch. [58:16.000 --> 58:17.000] Oh, I like that. [58:17.000 --> 58:18.000] And I let them know that. [58:18.000 --> 58:25.000] They never do it, but then that sets the stage for me calling them on their not having done it promptly. [58:25.000 --> 58:31.000] The second line is where in Texas Government Code 552-353, [58:31.000 --> 58:35.000] it says they're a criminal if they haven't answered me in 10 days. [58:35.000 --> 58:41.000] And is this under, if it's judicial, is it under the administrative code? [58:41.000 --> 58:42.000] It's government code. [58:42.000 --> 58:44.000] In Texas, it's called the government code. [58:44.000 --> 58:46.000] I don't know what you'll call it in Maine, [58:46.000 --> 58:50.000] but we're just about to go to our sponsor and I will take a look over the breaks. [58:50.000 --> 58:54.000] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? [58:54.000 --> 59:01.000] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help. [59:01.000 --> 59:06.000] The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today. [59:06.000 --> 59:11.000] It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God [59:11.000 --> 59:13.000] and to know the meaning of life. [59:13.000 --> 59:18.000] The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. [59:18.000 --> 59:24.000] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, [59:24.000 --> 59:28.000] growing in Christ, and how to build up the Church. [59:28.000 --> 59:34.000] To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, [59:34.000 --> 59:41.000] call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102. [59:41.000 --> 59:45.000] That's 888-551-0102. [59:45.000 --> 59:50.000] Or visit us online at bfa.org. [59:50.000 --> 01:00:00.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:06.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:09.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:00:09.000 --> 01:00:11.000] Our liberty depends on it. [01:00:11.000 --> 01:00:17.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:17.000 --> 01:00:19.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:00:19.000 --> 01:00:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:27.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:29.000] So protect your rights. [01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:32.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:35.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:00:35.000 --> 01:00:39.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:00:39.000 --> 01:00:43.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Vim. [01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:46.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:49.000] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. [01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:52.000] They pull back the covers and find a third party there. [01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:55.000] He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. [01:00:55.000 --> 01:01:01.000] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent. [01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:04.000] It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, [01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:07.000] a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. [01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:09.000] Third party, Third Amendment, get it? [01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:13.000] So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, [01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:17.000] tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment. [01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:22.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:35.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:39.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:41.000] Our liberty depends on it. [01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:47.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:49.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:53.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:57.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:01:57.000 --> 01:01:59.000] So protect your rights. [01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:03.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:05.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:09.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:13.000] a private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:16.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:22.000] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles. [01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:28.000] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. [01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:31.000] Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it? [01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:35.000] Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security. [01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:40.000] Keys in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. [01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:44.000] When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, [01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:47.000] I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells. [01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:50.000] Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights [01:02:50.000 --> 01:02:54.000] and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. [01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:06.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:29.000] Okay, we are back. This is the Rule of Law Radio. [01:03:29.000 --> 01:03:31.000] Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountain. [01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:36.000] And we are talking with Amy in Maine about records requests. [01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:43.000] And Amy, I get that you're super frustrated with these people not being transparent when these are our servants, [01:03:43.000 --> 01:03:48.000] our public servants, and they are required to respond to their masters. [01:03:48.000 --> 01:03:50.000] I get it. I'm right there with you. [01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:56.000] Okay, I'm taking a look right now at Maine.gov slash FOAA. [01:03:56.000 --> 01:04:01.000] And I see some interesting things that I think you might find helpful. [01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:12.000] Let's see. One of them here is it shows the actual, the Act. [01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:16.000] Let me pull that up again. There it is. Freedom of Access Act. [01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:24.000] And when you read through this, I think you'll be very encouraged to see, [01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:30.000] to get your head around what it is exactly that they're required to do and what can you do about it. [01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:38.000] Here I'm seeing in the frequently asked questions, which is how they are required to train. [01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:43.000] So I see here where their training is, they're required to go through this training, [01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:50.000] and the way that they're supposed to get started on their training is by reading the frequently asked questions on this site. [01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:56.000] Interesting, huh? So in Texas they have some videos that they put out. [01:04:56.000 --> 01:05:00.000] The attorney general will put out videos that last an hour or two, [01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:04.000] and they're supposed to watch these videos once a year. [01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:09.000] And then they have this self-certification system. [01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:15.000] But here in Maine I see where they're supposed to read the frequently asked questions. [01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:20.000] Well, that's pretty easy for any of the people to do as well. [01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:28.000] So when I look at that, I'm seeing who enforces the Freedom of Access Act. [01:05:28.000 --> 01:05:39.000] Any aggrieved person may appeal to any superior court in the state to seek relief for an alleged violation of the FOAA. [01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:43.000] Any superior court, boom. [01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:51.000] And it says the relief can be in the form of an order issued by the court that directs the government by to comply with the law. [01:05:51.000 --> 01:05:55.000] So that's cool to make it available for inspection or copying. [01:05:55.000 --> 01:06:07.000] In addition, the attorney general or the district attorneys may bring an enforcement action seeking penalties if the alleged violation is willful. [01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:10.000] So you would have to be able to show that it's willful. [01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:17.000] But if you bring that to their attention, all of those people are going to be able to put some pressure on them. [01:06:17.000 --> 01:06:21.000] And it even says below that that there's money going on here. [01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:26.000] It says that they are subject to a fine not more than $500 for the first violation, [01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:34.000] not more than $1,000 for another violation that was committed not more than four years after a previous one. [01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:39.000] And then if they do it again, then it's $2,000. [01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:45.000] So it's growing exponentially on them the more unresponsive they are. [01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:54.000] And so if that superior kangaroo court does nothing, which with all the heat, with the press and everything, I would think they would do. [01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:56.000] But it hasn't happened. [01:06:56.000 --> 01:06:58.000] That's why all of this is kind of smoking mirrors to me. [01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:03.000] But I would love to appeal to the main Supreme Court. [01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:05.000] And that would be an option, right? [01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:07.000] Obviously. [01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:08.000] Could appeal to the Supreme? [01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:09.000] I don't know. [01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:10.000] Yeah, it could be. [01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:15.000] I would say it's more likely that you would go to the Supreme, instead of with an appeal, [01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:19.000] go to them with a petition for a writ of mandamus. [01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:20.000] Okay. Yep. [01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:22.000] It's familiar. [01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:30.000] So you're asking the higher court to command the lower court to do what they're required by law to do. [01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:31.000] Okay. [01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:32.000] I like that. [01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:39.000] I think that this will at least instill, you know, the fear of God in these people to start complaining. [01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:40.000] Exactly. [01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:41.000] Yes. [01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:42.000] The fear of their masters. [01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:43.000] Records. [01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:44.000] Yeah. [01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:47.000] Even if you're involved, they're just like, we can't release that. [01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:49.000] It's, quote, undergoing investigation. [01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:51.000] And I'm like, but that was two years ago. [01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:53.000] Like, that's not relevant. [01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:59.000] Like, that is not a dissent to not provide me responses documents. [01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:00.000] No. [01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:03.000] That kind of thing just makes me want to have another records request for them. [01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:11.000] Number one, I'll give them a request that says, show me a record of the time that all of your people, each individual of your, [01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:19.000] I want to know the full name and the title and the amount of time they spent on this investigation over the last three years. [01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:20.000] Oh, okay. [01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:21.000] I like that. [01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:22.000] Oh, yeah. [01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:27.000] And what about like emails and, because they can just quote hours or whatever, [01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:33.000] but what about like any kind of inter-department, you know, email? [01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:37.000] But they're going to claim that investigation or... [01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:39.000] Well, but you've asked for metadata. [01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:47.000] If you're asking for, when you're asking for the records themselves, the ones that they're saying they get to withhold from you, [01:08:47.000 --> 01:08:49.000] well, then that doesn't really do much good. [01:08:49.000 --> 01:09:01.000] If you're asking for something that will prove that they were lying to you, they can't say that they need to withhold that too, right? [01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:02.000] I like it. [01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:09.000] Full name and title and times and dates of everyone working on this investigation. [01:09:09.000 --> 01:09:10.000] Yeah. [01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:12.000] How much time did they spend on it? [01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:14.000] Each person in the last three years. [01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:17.000] And I say three years, I mean, I don't know what Maine has. [01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:20.000] Texas has a sort of a little dotted line at three years. [01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:26.000] If you ask for records that are older than three years, then they get to charge you for going to look for them. [01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:27.000] Sure. [01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:30.000] I don't know if Maine has something similar, but... [01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:37.000] No, I never even cared about any of this until three years ago. [01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:41.000] So then, yeah, if they are saying that it's under investigation, you can ask them that. [01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:44.000] But you can also ask all kinds of things. [01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:47.000] Ask them, I want to see the amount... [01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:49.000] You can talk to the IT director. [01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:53.000] I want to see the amount of crypto traffic that you have on your network. [01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:55.000] Ask for things that they... [01:09:55.000 --> 01:10:02.000] They don't have a dog in the hunt and they don't know why you're asking that, but that's okay. [01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:03.000] They don't need to know. [01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:04.000] You're the master. [01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:05.000] Right. [01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:12.000] And if they only push back on a certain thing, then you start to notice a pattern. [01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:14.000] Here's a bunch of stuff they don't care. [01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:15.000] They'll let me see this. [01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:18.000] They'll let me see the report from the... [01:10:18.000 --> 01:10:28.000] We've got the state transportation office where people are supposed to have this memorandum of understanding with the comptroller. [01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:30.000] I want to see that report. [01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:32.000] They produced the report. [01:10:32.000 --> 01:10:38.000] Either end of the ones that produced it or the one that received it, either one ought to be able to give you that report. [01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:39.000] Where is it? [01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:40.000] I want to see it. [01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:41.000] Sure. [01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:44.000] Are the officials required to complete the freedom of access training? [01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:49.000] So I could say evidence of completion of freedom of access training. [01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:50.000] Exactly. [01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:51.000] Yes. [01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:52.000] I like it. [01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:58.000] When somebody's doing some pushback, I want to see those certifications that they've watched the videos every year. [01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:04.000] And they better not have missed it because that's a requirement of their office. [01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:06.000] That's a duty that they have. [01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:10.000] They can't just not be up on their training. [01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:12.000] They're required to get through this training. [01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:21.000] We have so many arrows in our quiver, but sometimes it's like they're just so lawless and you have to follow through, which I'm good at. [01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:25.000] I like following to see who leaves the battlefield first. [01:11:25.000 --> 01:11:27.000] That's not going to be me. [01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:28.000] It hasn't been. [01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:29.000] So they already know that. [01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:33.000] Thankfully, I'm on the don't mess with their list. [01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:38.000] She doesn't even do anything wrong, but she knows right from wrong. [01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:47.000] But these people are just, they're sick when they help other people do stuff and get CPS out of their lives. [01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:51.000] That's easy, but other stuff, they put up an awful hard fight. [01:11:51.000 --> 01:12:00.000] They're grabbing on with like white knuckles to the last, because they know that a good amount of us have, [01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:06.000] I'm sure you and Randy have been doing this so much longer than me, but a good amount of us at this point care. [01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:10.000] Suddenly, you know, they want to know. [01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:23.000] I have a little card that I hand out that says, as an American, you have one, your number one duty is to know your rights and know how to collect redress if they're infringed upon. [01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:28.000] And then people starting to be like, wait a minute, I really should know that. [01:12:28.000 --> 01:12:30.000] Oh, there you go. [01:12:30.000 --> 01:12:45.000] Hey, you know what occurs to me is you can reach out to the attorney general and ask for records from the attorney general that shows complaints that the attorney general acted on in the past. [01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:50.000] And that way you can see how's a good way to formulate your complaint when you go to the attorney general. [01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:56.000] Yeah, I'm writing this down. Do that ahead of time. [01:12:56.000 --> 01:13:05.000] It says here that the office of the attorney general or the district attorneys may bring enforcement action. [01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:08.000] I want to see those enforcement actions. [01:13:08.000 --> 01:13:10.000] Yeah. [01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:17.000] All right. So how would I word that if I want to get in the past 12 months? [01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:26.000] The amount or I could start easy, like how many enforcement actions have been or how many complaints have been acted upon? [01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:31.000] Just a general number. I feel like that's too skewed around it. [01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:38.000] You can. I try to always phrase it in instead of asking the question that's on my mind. [01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:47.000] I ask for the records that I think will contain that answer because then they can't come back and tell me, oh, we don't have to do research for you. [01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:55.000] And we don't have to compile programmatically manipulate data for your custom list. [01:13:55.000 --> 01:13:59.000] I'm not asking for that. I'm asking for certain records. [01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:20.000] And so in this case, like what we were just talking about, I would say, show me some records that are produced for me, some records showing the enforcement actions that have been brought in the last X number of months. [01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:30.000] That's really good because that can apply to so many different things like the county sheriff's office, I could say. They won't release the internal investor, the Office of Professional Review. [01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:34.000] They won't. And they try to skirt around it. And I know that they fired them. [01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:40.000] I know that, but they won't give me anything. Oh, we don't have anything. [01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:52.000] But yeah, like kind of skirting around it and finding, well, how many of your deputies have received disciplinary action in the past 12 months? [01:14:52.000 --> 01:14:55.000] Yeah, they don't want to tell you that. [01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:58.000] No. But you know what? That's transparency. [01:14:58.000 --> 01:15:10.000] And it's like being on the front page of paper for at least three times in the past 90 days, but nobody follows through, like because we don't know the rule of law. [01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:18.000] Like we don't know the process. And I finished Graves' course. Oh, good. I love that. [01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:24.000] So, you know, this is like, I love it. This is like all I care about. [01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:29.000] You know what I mean? Attorney General Aaron Frey. [01:15:29.000 --> 01:15:41.000] Oh, Aaron. Well, his mother. Oh, no, I'm sorry. My last judge that got recused, well, recused was, is our treasurer. [01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:46.000] Maine has only three constitutional officers. Treasurer is one of them. It's her son. [01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:52.000] And I'm like, this is so, I thought we weren't supposed to have that in this country, this royalty line, you know. [01:15:52.000 --> 01:15:57.000] Oh, wow. But Frey is gross, like R.A.G. [01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:04.000] Last time we were here, me and a group brought 12,000 affidavits about the voter fraud. [01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:17.000] And even though we only have four electoral votes, but either way, he was in Afghanistan fighting for transgender rights at that time. [01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:24.000] I was like, wow, like, this is insane. Yeah. True story. [01:16:24.000 --> 01:16:31.000] But yeah, so Maine, I want to move back to Texas. I live in San Antonio. [01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:40.000] I want to move to a red state. Yeah. Right. But I love Maine. Take it over. To America. Yeah. Show them how it works. [01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:50.000] I'm going to do it. I'm going to do it, Brett. Thank you so much for all this stuff. And I love listening to your show. And God bless you. [01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:57.000] OK, great. Well, thanks so much for calling. Good to hear from you. I hope things go well with your launching into them. [01:16:57.000 --> 01:17:11.000] OK, we're going to go to our sponsors. Be right back. [01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:38.000] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. [01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:47.000] For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at Yahoo.com. [01:17:47.000 --> 01:18:00.000] That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at Yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000] I love Logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:10.000] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without Logos. [01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:20.000] And I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [01:18:20.000 --> 01:18:22.000] How can I help Logos? [01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:29.000] Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos in ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. [01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:37.000] First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:43.000] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. [01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:44.000] Do I pay extra? [01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:45.000] No. [01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:47.000] Do you have to do anything different when I order? [01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:48.000] No. [01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:49.000] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [01:18:49.000 --> 01:18:51.000] No. I mean, yes. [01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:57.000] Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. [01:18:57.000 --> 01:18:58.000] You're welcome. [01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:00.000] Happy holidays, Logos. [01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:10.000] This is the Logos Radio Network. [01:19:30.000 --> 01:19:55.000] All right. We are back. This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountain. [01:19:55.000 --> 01:20:04.000] And we are going to go to our next caller, which, well, I see we've got Jacob here. We've got Jane and Jason. See you all there. [01:20:04.000 --> 01:20:14.000] And we're going to go ahead and go to Jacob. Jacob's next up. Jane, you were going to be right behind Jacob, but then you had a first-time caller jump in front of you. [01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:19.000] You know how we take first-time callers. Hello, Jacob. How are you this evening? [01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:26.000] Hey, Brett. How are you doing? I talked to you guys shortly last week, first time. [01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:27.000] So just a little background. [01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:30.000] Yeah. So what's on your mind this evening? [01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:40.000] Just so everyone didn't listen lastly, quick background. So first time going into court, I'm suing a debt collector for a debt that I do not owe. [01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:46.000] It's already been paid. I have a statement from the original creditor saying so. [01:20:46.000 --> 01:21:01.000] So I filed an amended complaint, like you guys suggested. You know, my first complaint, they gave me this small little three-sentence box that I could fit my whole complaint in. [01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:21.000] I got my amended complaint in. I also filed, first thing I did was barter a lawyer for professional misconduct and such. I filed any motion for rule 11 sanctions and also, you know, stated how he committed. [01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:28.000] I came to find out that he committed perjury and an affidavit after, you know, going through the docket and reading it more. [01:21:28.000 --> 01:21:40.000] Wow. Yeah. I got him for perjury. So I sent him a nicely worded email on, you guessed it, Independence Day. [01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:47.000] And now before this, I had no problem contacting this lawyer. He was cocky as hell. [01:21:47.000 --> 01:22:02.000] He was telling me how, oh, you're going to be paying my attorney fees and such and such and telling me I'm just the little old nothing pro se, probably because my original complaint, you know, I couldn't really say shit on that paper and I didn't know any better. [01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:22.000] Now, he won't even talk to me. Nothing. I am just cranking. I sent him an email saying that, you know, I came with notice of his perjury and I'm going to file a criminal complaint with my local special agent in charge, FBI. [01:22:22.000 --> 01:22:38.000] So that's really got him in the corner. So my question is how, I heard you and Brandy, today I was listening to an older show. [01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:56.000] I heard Brandy mentioning you can sue an attorney civilly for false and misleading statements and such. I'm really having a great time beating this guy up. [01:22:56.000 --> 01:23:03.000] Yeah, that's great. So are you wanting to sue him? What were you planning on suing him in the state or the feds? [01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:21.000] So I'm in the state right now. So you have to look at your state. What's the cause of action in the state? You look up the essential elements of that cause of action and you find facts that go along with that. [01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:40.000] Okay. Does that make sense? Yeah. It's kind of like writing a criminal complaint or a bar grievance in that you have to find a reference point. With a bar grievance, you went and found a rule that the attorney violated and he's required to not violate any of these rules. [01:23:40.000 --> 01:23:50.000] You found one that he violated and you look at the language of that and you break it apart and say, well, if he did this and this while doing that, then that's a violation of this rule. [01:23:50.000 --> 01:24:08.000] Well, it's the same exact thing when you find a cause of action. You go and see what are the essential elements of that and you just make sure that you assert a fact or make a statement of some kind that goes along with it so that you've covered all the bases and now you've got that cause of action. [01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:36.000] Okay. All right. Yeah, I'm checking. All right. And then one more quick question. I heard you mentioned earlier, you know, you love asking the courts for the facts number. I asked the clerk. So I noticed on all of these, all of this judge's orders, Judge Terri Estupica, on all of her orders, he sees seeing the attorney, not me, just the attorney and all of her orders, all his motions, whatever. [01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:56.000] So I asked her, you know, I was like, hey, you guys have a facts number? And she was like, yeah, we do. And I was, I asked her for it and she was like, oh, well, we can only give that, we only have a facts number for our criminal division. We don't have one for our civil division. We can't give that out. [01:24:56.000 --> 01:24:58.000] Can't give it out. [01:24:58.000 --> 01:25:05.000] Yeah, she says we don't have one for our civil division. We can't give you our facts number. [01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:16.000] Well, you know, you're in Ohio, so you could be testing out this deal where you request records and they don't give it to you. [01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:45.000] Like in your case, you would ask for the IT director of the court, whoever's in the court building, ask for the IT director. I mean, ask for records of the IT directors, records of all of the DID numbers and an indicator because, you know, in IT, they've got, DID is the numbers that are dial-in numbers. [01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:58.000] The incoming numbers, people that, numbers that are exposed to the public. So it doesn't include things like extension 14 or something on the inside, but it includes numbers that you can call from outside. [01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:26.000] And in IT, they've got, somebody's got a list of all the facts numbers and whether this one goes to Judge Thompson's office and this one goes to wherever. And it might say something about hallway four, but you'll have some kind of an indication at the IT level of which one is which. Yeah, I want those records. [01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:40.000] One more thing I forgot, just real quick, something real quick about this attorney. So I was going to file it, but I decided to wait until I got this amending complaint filed and everything. [01:26:40.000 --> 01:27:02.000] I didn't want to get on the judge's bad side or whatever, but I also have a motion. I stole this from, I plagiarized it from Alphonse in the chat, a motion for curative instructions as it pertains to citizens arrest for the perjury on this attorney. [01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:18.000] So you're asking him to tell you in the court, I'm asking the court to instruct me as it pertains to our revised code on citizens arrest because he committed a felony. [01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:21.000] And you want to arrest it. [01:27:21.000 --> 01:27:26.000] Pretty cool. [01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:37.000] Very nice. That sounds kind of like a corollary to what Randy will extend in the courtroom and point to the bailiff. You, go arrest that judge. [01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:51.000] Right, and I asked him too in my motion, I asked if, you know, I said, you know, isn't the court staff obliged to assist me in such citizens arrest? [01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:54.000] You're asking that question? [01:27:54.000 --> 01:28:05.000] Well, that's kind of what my motion was. I was just stating, I was asking him, you know, I kind of stole this from Alphonse, like I said. [01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:17.000] Well, but he's going to have Pennsylvania stuff. You need to take a look at what does Ohio say. You need to know the answer to the question instead of ask them, you need to know what lawfully imposed duties they have. [01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:19.000] And that's what you asked them to do. [01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:31.000] I didn't really ask them. I took some parts out. I asked them if they have any combatting, if they're going to combat that, I want to know beforehand, basically. [01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:37.000] I basically asked them if there's any problem with me doing that. And if there is, I want them to state that. [01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:40.000] Okay. [01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:47.000] So, yeah, throw yourself under the bus, please. [01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:52.000] All lawless people, raise your hand. [01:28:52.000 --> 01:28:59.000] I'm having funner than I got a settlement today and I'm having funner than that. I got a settlement for a TCPA. [01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:02.000] You did. Sweet. Congratulations. [01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:07.000] Fortune 500 Company, they're going to cut me $5,000. [01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:09.000] I love it. [01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:18.000] Yeah. Well, it was a business. I have a cell phone I opened an LLC up with about a year ago and my cell phone number is undone in Bradstreet and they scraped my number. [01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:34.000] And I can't, oh boy, he's right now off the top of my head. But about two months ago, a federal court decided that a personal cell phone can also double as a business phone and be protected under TCPA. [01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:37.000] So, all right. Well, thanks, Randy. I'll let you get on. [01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:41.000] Appreciate it. All right. Well, thanks for calling. [01:29:41.000 --> 01:30:01.000] All right. Well, we're about to go to our sponsors again. Jane, you'll be up next. [01:30:01.000 --> 01:30:11.000] A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America. If you build an electrical smart grid, the hackers will come and they could cause a catastrophic blackout. [01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:16.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment. [01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:26.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:32.000] So, protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:41.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000] Start over with Startpage. [01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:52.000] Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into your home too with a smart grid. [01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:59.000] So, they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely monitor electric use for efficiency and avoid grid failure. [01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:08.000] But cybersecurity expert David Chalk says not so fast. If we make the national power grid controllable through the web, hackers will have a field day. [01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:15.000] Working remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation, leaving us vulnerable to our enemies. [01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:24.000] I've long opposed smart meters for privacy and health reasons. The catastrophic failures caused by hackers? There's nothing smart about that. [01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:31.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:37.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:44.000] The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:47.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:49.000] And thousands of my fellow force responders are dying. [01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:51.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:56.000] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:56.000 --> 01:31:58.000] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:03.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:06.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:08.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [01:32:08.000 --> 01:32:13.000] And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [01:32:13.000 --> 01:32:20.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:26.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:36.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:41.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:51.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:55.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [01:32:55.000 --> 01:33:02.000] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:12.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:42.000] Okay, we are back. [01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:43.000] Rule of Law Radio. [01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:44.000] Randy Kelton. [01:33:44.000 --> 01:33:45.000] I'm Brett Fountain. [01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:50.000] And we're going to go to our next caller, which is Jane in Texas. [01:33:50.000 --> 01:33:52.000] Good evening, Jane. [01:33:52.000 --> 01:33:53.000] What's on your mind? [01:33:53.000 --> 01:33:54.000] Hi, Brett. [01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:55.000] How are you? [01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:56.000] Long time no talk to you. [01:33:56.000 --> 01:33:59.000] Yeah, I'm doing pretty well. [01:33:59.000 --> 01:34:02.000] Good, good. [01:34:02.000 --> 01:34:03.000] Okay. [01:34:02.000 --> 01:34:13.000] Well, you know that my case is going on with my neighbor, and actually I'm not as concerned about that so much anymore because we're going to win. [01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:16.000] Great. [01:34:16.000 --> 01:34:17.000] Yeah. [01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:20.000] But that doesn't mean I'm going to get paid or anything. [01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:22.000] It's just that she's not going to win. [01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:24.000] Well, still. [01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:26.000] That's still good. [01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:28.000] Yeah, it is good. [01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:36.000] So I have, on the 20th, I have my jury trial for the cat nabbing thing. [01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:38.000] Remember? [01:34:38.000 --> 01:34:51.000] Oh, yeah, where you rescued the cat that she stole and locked up on her porch, and you got the cat out of there, but you also took, I think, a cage or something off of the porch? [01:34:51.000 --> 01:35:02.000] Yeah, off the patio, and I just relocated it so I could relocate my cat inside my garage with the door closed, and then I was waiting for the cops to get here. [01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:05.000] And as soon as they got here, I gave them the case back. [01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:16.000] And then four months later, I get charges of theft and trespassing in the mail, so I know it's insane. [01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:20.000] So I've gone to the court a couple of times. [01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:34.000] The last time was the time that I was supposed to go talk to is a free trial hearing, so I had to go in front of the prosecutor, and she said, what do you want to do with these? [01:35:34.000 --> 01:35:36.000] And I said, I want to have them dismissed. [01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:39.000] And she goes, well, I'll tell you what I can do. [01:35:39.000 --> 01:35:40.000] I'll tell you what I will do. [01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:51.000] She goes, I'll dismiss the theft, but on the trespass, you've got to pay $100 over the next three months, and then I won't let it go on your record. [01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:54.000] And I said, excuse me. [01:35:54.000 --> 01:36:00.000] I said, you know, I really don't care if it's on my record, but I'm not going to pay you $100. [01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:01.000] So anyway. [01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:03.000] That's like saying you're guilty. [01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:04.000] I know. [01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:05.000] I know exactly. [01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:06.000] And so there's no way. [01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:09.000] I didn't even talk about the merit for the case, and it's like that. [01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:12.000] I just said, there's no way I'm paying you $100. [01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:22.000] And I said, and so she got upset, pulled the theft thing back out of the, out of her pile that I guess she was going to throw away or whatever, and put that back on the stack. [01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:32.000] And she said, and I said, y'all don't have a right to charge me under the state of Texas anyway, because you don't have, under the Constitution, you don't. [01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:34.000] And she says, well, you can take that up with the judge. [01:36:34.000 --> 01:36:37.000] And I said, but the judge is not here. [01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:39.000] Oh, that wasn't the judge? [01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:40.000] Huh? [01:36:40.000 --> 01:36:41.000] That wasn't the judge? [01:36:41.000 --> 01:36:42.000] Who was that? [01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:43.000] That was a prosecutor. [01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:45.000] They have free trial here. [01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:48.000] Oh, you don't have to talk to the prosecutor. [01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:50.000] Well, I mean, I have no choice. [01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:54.000] I had to go there or else, you know, a warrant, supposedly. [01:36:54.000 --> 01:36:58.000] So yeah, but you go there and you ask to see the magistrate. [01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:01.000] And they're going to say, oh, the magistrate's not available. [01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:10.000] You'll have to wait and see the magistrate, you have to set a date or you have to, you know, see the magistrate on Thursday at motions hearing time or something. [01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:13.000] They're not going to let you see the magistrate, but you've asked. [01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:14.000] And they refused. [01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:15.000] Well, you did your job. [01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:16.000] You showed up. [01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:18.000] You did your part. [01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:19.000] You appeared. [01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:23.000] But I also had already filed motions to have it dismissed. [01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:29.000] I filed multiple motions to have it dismissed on the basis of no subject matter jurisdiction and all kinds of stuff. [01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:31.000] And I said, and you all just ignored that. [01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:34.000] And she goes, and she goes, well, we didn't ignore it. [01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:39.000] And I said, well, he responded back and said that I still owe the money. [01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:42.000] So she goes, well, that's not being, that's not ignoring it. [01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:43.000] And I said, well. [01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:44.000] Yeah. [01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:45.000] And so. [01:37:45.000 --> 01:37:50.000] But you need to put your motion to dismiss, put it on for hearing. [01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:51.000] Yeah, I didn't. [01:37:51.000 --> 01:38:00.000] So you call the court coordinator or the court administrator and just ask her, please put my motion on for hearing. [01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:02.000] And they'll set a date for it. [01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:04.000] And they'll say when it's going to be heard. [01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:11.000] And you go in there and they'll probably try to sweep past it and try to start talking about the merits or something. [01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:12.000] But you don't let them. [01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:17.000] You make sure that they deal with that subject matter jurisdiction. [01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:25.000] Well, it's too late for that because before I walked out of there, she said, well, the only way I could talk to the judge. [01:38:25.000 --> 01:38:30.000] And I guess I should have called you before now because it's been about a month or two ago. [01:38:30.000 --> 01:38:37.000] And she said, well, then you want to go before the judge in a trial. [01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:38.000] And I said, yeah, but not before the judge. [01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:40.000] I want to do a jury trial. [01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:42.000] So anyway, she got all kicked off. [01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:47.000] And I had to sign the deal, both of the old ladies got in the mail. [01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:51.000] Initially, it was supposed to be on this week. [01:38:51.000 --> 01:39:00.000] And I don't know if they caught wind of the fact that we were supposed to go to our jury trial on my civil case next week. [01:39:00.000 --> 01:39:08.000] But the attorneys decided to continue it for another 60 days, which I wasn't too happy about that. [01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:12.000] And I was notified about it through the filing. [01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:22.000] But I didn't understand with my attorney why he would want to go ahead and continue because we need to go ahead and get this thing over with with civil things. [01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:23.000] But anyway. [01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:24.000] Well, hang on. [01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:26.000] This is a criminal, right? [01:39:26.000 --> 01:39:28.000] They're holding you for trespass. [01:39:28.000 --> 01:39:31.000] They're holding you to stand and answer for a charge of trespass. [01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:37.000] But they haven't come up with any actual criminal complaint yet, a sworn criminal complaint affidavit. [01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:40.000] And information that's derived from that? [01:39:40.000 --> 01:39:41.000] Yeah. [01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:43.000] I mean, I have that. [01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:44.000] I have those. [01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:49.000] But they're not written by someone with personal knowledge. [01:39:49.000 --> 01:39:51.000] It was written by the clerk of the court. [01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:55.000] And because of the citation that she read that the police did. [01:39:55.000 --> 01:40:03.000] But what I'm planning on doing and what I was bringing the other case in for was because I think that my neighbors talked to them [01:40:03.000 --> 01:40:08.000] and made them realize that we had this thing going on and this week. [01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:10.000] And they thought that they were going to go ahead and reset it. [01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:12.000] So they reset it until the 20th. [01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:13.000] And so now. [01:40:13.000 --> 01:40:14.000] Okay. [01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:16.000] I'm getting kind of lost with all that. [01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:20.000] But can we back up just a minute to the charging instrument? [01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:21.000] Yeah. [01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:25.000] You said that a clerk wrote up a complaint. [01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:28.000] Well, actually, it was several different complaints. [01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:35.000] And they couldn't decide who was going to sign it and who was going to authorize it or whatever. [01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:42.000] And so they, you know, ended up being like three different complaints on the staff, three different complaints on the trespass. [01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:46.000] And there ended up being that one of them didn't get signed at all. [01:40:46.000 --> 01:40:52.000] And then a prosecutor ended up signing one of them because they couldn't decide who was going to sign them, right? [01:40:52.000 --> 01:40:53.000] Okay. [01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:56.000] And they were prosecuting in the name of the state of Texas. [01:40:56.000 --> 01:41:01.000] But the reason why I'm calling it is because when I go to jury trial, because I already know I'm going to jury trial. [01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:03.000] And that's what I asked for. [01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:04.000] No, no, no. [01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:05.000] Hang on. [01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:12.000] They can't jump to jury trial when they haven't even commenced the case yet. [01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:25.000] But Code and Criminal Procedure 2504 says that the court clerk has to serve you with the indictment before you can have that trial. [01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:27.000] Look at 2504. [01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:28.000] There's no indictment. [01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:29.000] Where is that document? [01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:31.000] They haven't been to a grand jury. [01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:33.000] They don't have an indictment. [01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:34.000] What are they talking about? [01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:35.000] They haven't done anything. [01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:43.000] They're trying to get you to go into this little loophole they've got in Code of Criminal Procedure 2714D, as in Delta, [01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:51.000] where you just go along with any little scribble, scrabble piece of paper they've got and you just agree to it. [01:41:51.000 --> 01:42:05.000] And next thing you know, they get to skip all the hassle of having to go and follow the law and come up with a real criminal complaint that's signed by a real complainant. [01:42:05.000 --> 01:42:11.000] You know, a credible person, the lawyer, the people in that office can't do that. [01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:13.000] Maybe they can. [01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:15.000] And they think they can under Chapter 45. [01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:16.000] But that's what I'm saying. [01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:17.000] That's where I was going to go to. [01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:19.000] I wasn't going to argue the merits of the case at all. [01:42:19.000 --> 01:42:25.000] I was going to go to, if I was going to do a jury trial, I was going to stand up and let everybody know that it's in the jury, [01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:33.000] about how they're breaking the law under the Texas Constitution, how they are not supposed to be prosecuted in the name of the state of Texas, for one. [01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:36.000] And that's what the Texas Constitution says. [01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:38.000] They only give that power of attorney. [01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:40.000] They only give that power to the district and the county court. [01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:42.000] And it has to be through an indictment. [01:42:42.000 --> 01:43:00.000] And I want, that's why I wanted to go ahead and go to trial, so I could let the people there know that, hey, all these criminal, all these charges that they had put on the citizens of Irving for criminal complaints under the name of the state of Texas, they cannot legally do. [01:43:00.000 --> 01:43:05.000] So, but now you're telling me, okay, so now I haven't even thought about that. [01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:09.000] I mean, I had already thought about it, but it's not been doing anything. [01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:16.000] If you want to go to the jury trial, you can. I'm just saying you don't have to let them have that much room. [01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:24.000] You can continue to hold them accountable for the due process violations they've been doing up front, if you want. [01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:30.000] I mean, if you want to go ahead and get all the truth in front of these other jurors, that's pretty cool, too. [01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:33.000] That's an admirable purpose. [01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:41.000] You know, I don't know whether or not they'll listen or what will happen there, but I think that's pretty cool. Get the truth out. [01:43:41.000 --> 01:43:49.000] But I don't know how I'm going to argue this, though, because as far as what you're saying that I should do, because I've already, I just didn't set it for hearing. That's what it was. [01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:51.000] I didn't set it for hearing. [01:43:51.000 --> 01:43:55.000] Yeah, we always have to set our emotions on for hearing. They just never tell us that. [01:43:55.000 --> 01:43:58.000] Well, hold on. We're going to go to our sponsors real quick. [01:43:58.000 --> 01:44:00.000] Okay. [01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:06.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [01:44:06.000 --> 01:44:11.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:17.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:44:17.000 --> 01:44:25.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:31.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:39.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:47.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:51.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:44:51.000 --> 01:44:58.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:02.000] Order now. [01:45:02.000 --> 01:45:06.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:06.000 --> 01:45:17.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:17.000 --> 01:45:21.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:21.000 --> 01:45:25.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:25.000 --> 01:45:30.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:30.000 --> 01:45:36.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:36.000 --> 01:45:45.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:45.000 --> 01:45:54.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:54.000 --> 01:46:18.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:24.000 --> 01:46:48.000] Alright, we are back, Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton, Rat Fountain, and we are going to go back to our... [01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:51.000] Whoops, I clicked the wrong thing here, sorry. [01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:54.000] Okay, we're going to go back to Jane in Texas here. [01:46:54.000 --> 01:46:55.000] This is our last segment. [01:46:55.000 --> 01:46:57.000] Jason, I see you there. [01:46:57.000 --> 01:46:59.000] Hopefully, we'll be able to get to you as well. [01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:12.000] Okay, so Jane, you were saying that you wanted to be able to spread the good news to the jurors and tell them about their rights and tell them about how due process is being violated. [01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:13.000] Is that what I'm understanding? [01:47:13.000 --> 01:47:27.000] I'm not sure that's going to work, but I'm not sure how well I can argue it, but I do know that what I'm saying is on the other aspect, what you're saying I should do is fight it before I go to jury, and I understand what you're saying, [01:47:27.000 --> 01:47:48.000] but the issue is, on the Texas Constitution, the Bill of Rights for the 6th and 10th, the right of the Constitution and criminal prosecution, it says that, you know, they took out the part about having to be inducted by a grand jury, except in cases in which the punishment is by fine, which mine is by fine. [01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:57.000] And so what I'm saying is they took that part out, but if you go look at the footnotes or whatever, trying to find out how they amended it or whatever, you can't find that. [01:47:57.000 --> 01:48:07.000] So what I'm saying is all they got to do is go to the Texas Constitution and say, and what it says except for in cases, you know, I don't have to be indicted on an immigrant jury. [01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:08.000] You know what I'm saying? [01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:09.000] That's what the Texas Constitution says. [01:48:09.000 --> 01:48:16.000] Well, still, even if they're going to say it's an information, they're going to prosecute you on an information, they don't have one of those either. [01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:21.000] No, they don't. They just have their complaint. [01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:24.000] They call them legal complaints. That's what they call them. [01:48:24.000 --> 01:48:30.000] That didn't even call them a sworn, it's not sworn under, you know, the penalty of perjury or anything like that. [01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:40.000] Right. And that's perfectly fine for dealing with a parking ticket or, you know, some municipal code violation thing. [01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:46.000] And if you're an employee of the organization, that'd be perfect. [01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:48.000] That makes perfect sense. [01:48:48.000 --> 01:48:54.000] There's no need to go through all this due process. [01:48:54.000 --> 01:48:56.000] They have to step through so many hoops. [01:48:56.000 --> 01:49:03.000] Why should they have to if you work for the organization and you violated one of the organizational rules, municipal code ordinance? [01:49:03.000 --> 01:49:04.000] Okay, that makes sense. [01:49:04.000 --> 01:49:05.000] They get to skip that. [01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:11.000] They get to do this other process that's a lot less burdensome for them. [01:49:11.000 --> 01:49:23.000] But when it comes to crimes, state offenses, like you're being accused of trespass, well, that's actually not true. [01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:25.000] You didn't trespass. [01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:27.000] The lady wasn't even there. [01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:38.000] How did you, you know, you didn't have any notice, she didn't have any no trespass signs on the place where you went to rescue your cat from where she locked it up. [01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:40.000] So it's not like you had any notice. [01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:44.000] You just went, grabbed your cat and left. [01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:45.000] Yeah. [01:49:45.000 --> 01:49:53.000] So, you know, if you look at the document that they're charging you with and it doesn't contain all of those elements, [01:49:53.000 --> 01:50:03.000] which would include in this case, notice, if you look at what criminal trespass is 3005 penal code, and it requires notice. [01:50:03.000 --> 01:50:05.000] Right. [01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:13.000] So if their document that's charging you doesn't talk about that, then that's another defect in their charging instrument. [01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:23.000] Not only was it not signed by a person who's authorized to sign it, but it also doesn't even state all the elements of any offense. [01:50:23.000 --> 01:50:31.000] So I need to go ahead and, Brian, because I got to look at the motions I had already filed to see what I did or did not say there, [01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:36.000] but obviously it wasn't enough to get the judge's attention, but I didn't set it to hearing, though. [01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:38.000] So that's my fault. [01:50:38.000 --> 01:50:41.000] Yeah, go ahead and set it for hearing. [01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:44.000] I didn't say for hearing because I forgot about that part. [01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:47.000] I thought they were just going to, like, just dismiss it. [01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:51.000] I was just thinking they were just going to dismiss it because they know I was right, but they didn't do that. [01:50:51.000 --> 01:50:52.000] Yeah, I didn't know. [01:50:52.000 --> 01:50:55.000] Early on, I didn't know that you have to set your motions for hearing. [01:50:55.000 --> 01:51:00.000] And so I would wait until they are dealing with the motions that they're trying to deal with. [01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:04.000] You know, well, we want to, whatever, continue this. [01:51:04.000 --> 01:51:07.000] And I'd be like, whoa, whoa, wait, wait, no continuing. [01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:08.000] Hold on. [01:51:08.000 --> 01:51:10.000] You got this other motion that was here first. [01:51:10.000 --> 01:51:13.000] We need to deal with this threshold issue. [01:51:13.000 --> 01:51:18.000] You know, I'd have to get it heard that way, but you don't have to wait. [01:51:18.000 --> 01:51:22.000] You can go ahead and just call up the court coordinator or the court administrator [01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:25.000] and ask them to put it on for a motions hearing. [01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:27.000] Or you can even just go in there. [01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:32.000] Most courts have a little rotation, a schedule where they have it set up for, you know, every Thursday morning. [01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:34.000] We have motions hearings. [01:51:34.000 --> 01:51:35.000] And you just get in line. [01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:40.000] You go in there and have your motions heard. [01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:44.000] I might just do that because, okay, well, I know you've got another caller to do, [01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:48.000] but I've still got one more time I can call in, unless you're not going to be there next week, [01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:52.000] or I may even talk to you on Telegram or something. [01:51:52.000 --> 01:51:53.000] Yeah, that'd be great. [01:51:53.000 --> 01:51:54.000] Either one or both. [01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:55.000] Okay. [01:51:55.000 --> 01:51:57.000] I'll let you go because I know you've got another call. [01:51:57.000 --> 01:51:58.000] All right. [01:51:58.000 --> 01:51:59.000] Thanks, Brett. [01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:00.000] All right. [01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:01.000] Thanks for calling. [01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:02.000] Good to talk with you. [01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:03.000] You too. [01:52:03.000 --> 01:52:04.000] Bye-bye. [01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:05.000] Good night. [01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:10.000] And Jason in California, thanks for being patient. [01:52:10.000 --> 01:52:12.000] What's on your mind this evening? [01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:13.000] Hey, Brett. [01:52:13.000 --> 01:52:14.000] How are you doing? [01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:16.000] I'm doing great. [01:52:16.000 --> 01:52:18.000] Thank you so much again. [01:52:18.000 --> 01:52:22.000] I just have to say, every time I hear that commercial where Randy says, [01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:33.000] radiated, adulterated, and mutilated, it makes me laugh. [01:52:33.000 --> 01:52:38.000] We feed our pets better than we feed ourselves. [01:52:38.000 --> 01:52:39.000] Great. [01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:46.000] So many questions, and I don't know what is the most important thing to focus on, [01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:55.000] but so I was officially served with a workplace restraining order from this store [01:52:55.000 --> 01:53:06.000] that's been just fucking making my life very unpleasant for the past year. [01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:11.000] And I had sent them, I guess we would call it a tort, [01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:13.000] but I didn't know about torts when I did it. [01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:21.000] I just sent them affidavits, notices of claim, a default notice. [01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:26.000] I heard from their insurance company, they wanted to see my videos, [01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:32.000] and I wouldn't send them, but they offered me $250 as a gesture. [01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:39.000] Anyway, so I started going back there thinking like, you know, I've handled this, [01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:46.000] and a few of the employees were gone, you know, that were in my notices. [01:53:46.000 --> 01:53:56.000] One of the managers, the main store manager, disappeared, and the new crew started to harass me. [01:53:56.000 --> 01:54:03.000] Like basically, you know, like approach me, tell me I'm not allowed to shop there, [01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:06.000] and I just pay for my groceries and leave. [01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:12.000] But then they started to like wait for me outside when I was done shopping [01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:15.000] and tell me I'm not allowed to shop there. [01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:18.000] And, you know, I'd called the police a couple times. [01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:20.000] They wouldn't do anything. [01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:21.000] But it's evolved. [01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:24.000] I had an experience in May. [01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:27.000] I called the police. [01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:29.000] They wouldn't do anything. [01:54:29.000 --> 01:54:35.000] I got ahold of the district manager who basically just repeated [01:54:35.000 --> 01:54:37.000] exactly what these people have been saying to me, [01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:41.000] that I've done X, Y, and Z, and I'm not allowed there. [01:54:41.000 --> 01:54:44.000] And I'm like, you know, I'm going to keep going. [01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:49.000] And the next day, they filed this petition. [01:54:49.000 --> 01:54:57.000] So the petitioner is the company, Trader Joe's, [01:54:57.000 --> 01:55:05.000] and they have like six employees listed that need protection from me. [01:55:05.000 --> 01:55:10.000] So I read everything, and it was pretty devastating. [01:55:10.000 --> 01:55:18.000] So my initial question is, so the instructions on how to file this, [01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:25.000] like they, let me see, if you're seeking orders based on information [01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:31.000] from your employees and others and not based on what you have personally observed, [01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:38.000] you must have each of those persons complete a declaration to the attached petition. [01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:39.000] Okay. [01:55:39.000 --> 01:55:48.000] I have, I've got 13 declarations from six different employees. [01:55:48.000 --> 01:55:49.000] Okay. [01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:55.000] One of them, one of them has, is on a court form [01:55:55.000 --> 01:56:02.000] that actually has a swear under penalty of perjury thing. [01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:09.000] All the other ones don't, and all the other ones are 90% false. [01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:14.000] Like even like, it's almost like a fifth grade writing assignment [01:56:14.000 --> 01:56:19.000] where they give you a few elements and you just have to write a story. [01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:31.000] So my question is, are those, these declarations, are they, okay. [01:56:31.000 --> 01:56:37.000] Well, the first question is, what I was served with, are those, these are the final documents. [01:56:37.000 --> 01:56:42.000] I'm not going to see a document that looks different than what I was served. [01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:44.000] Hmm. [01:56:44.000 --> 01:56:45.000] I don't know. [01:56:45.000 --> 01:56:46.000] Okay. [01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:52.000] So it sounds like they're proceeding based on some rules that you probably want to go read. [01:56:52.000 --> 01:56:57.000] And when it says something that you found somewhere that said that it had to have a declaration [01:56:57.000 --> 01:57:02.000] or be supported by a declaration, you're going to want to find out what is, [01:57:02.000 --> 01:57:08.000] what makes a declaration sufficient in that particular context. [01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:12.000] Because, you know, if you try to take that to court, it will be worthless. [01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:17.000] And you have to have it, the first one, no, you mentioned there are 13 [01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:24.000] and one of them does have, it's been acknowledged or sworn to in some way there. [01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:25.000] Yeah. [01:57:25.000 --> 01:57:27.000] Like a notary. [01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:28.000] Okay. [01:57:28.000 --> 01:57:30.000] Met, yeah. [01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:33.000] So that one is going to probably be legit. [01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:39.000] When you look at what the rule says about declaration to define sufficiency, [01:57:39.000 --> 01:57:42.000] because obviously it's going to have some requirements. [01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:44.000] You can't just say, here's my. [01:57:44.000 --> 01:57:48.000] But where do you think I would look for those rules at? [01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:50.000] Well, I'm not sure. [01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:53.000] Is that a court rule or is it an evidence rule? [01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:56.000] I'm not sure. [01:57:56.000 --> 01:57:58.000] It wouldn't be evidence. [01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:03.000] It would be in the definition of take, you'll have to follow the trail, [01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:10.000] starting from what defines this action that they're taking. [01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:17.000] And you'll see, where did you find the mention of there needing to be a declaration? [01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:19.000] That would be probably a really good place to check. [01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:24.000] The instruction, the info from the court. [01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:27.000] From there, what is it called? [01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:29.000] It's a judicial document. [01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:31.000] Right. [01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:34.000] Man, Jason, I'm sorry you waited so long. [01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:36.000] We're coming down to the very tail end here [01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:40.000] and I don't have a good, solid answer for you on that one. [01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:42.000] You'll have to chase it down. [01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:47.000] I guess we'll just have to catch up next week and continue this. [01:58:47.000 --> 01:58:49.000] Thanks for calling. Good night. [01:59:17.000 --> 01:59:21.000] Visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:23.000] This translation is highly accurate [01:59:23.000 --> 01:59:26.000] and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, [01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:30.000] plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:36.000] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, [01:59:36.000 --> 01:59:41.000] call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:45.000] That's 888-551-0102. [01:59:45.000 --> 01:59:50.000] Or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:50.000 --> 01:59:53.000] Looking for some truth? [01:59:53.000 --> 01:59:55.000] You found it. [01:59:55.000 --> 02:00:18.000] Visit us online at bfa.org.