[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.500 --> 00:09.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.000 --> 00:10.500] Our liberty depends on it. [00:10.500 --> 00:16.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [00:16.500 --> 00:18.500] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.500 --> 00:22.500] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.500 --> 00:27.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:27.000 --> 00:32.500] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.500 --> 00:35.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:35.000 --> 00:38.500] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [00:38.500 --> 00:42.500] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Vim. [00:42.500 --> 00:46.000] Start over with Startpage. [00:46.000 --> 00:51.000] Most of us know that taking the fifth means you're choosing to remain silent about a criminal matter. [00:51.000 --> 00:55.500] It's a good way to remember that the Fifth Amendment spells out what can and can't happen to you [00:55.500 --> 00:57.500] when you're accused of a criminal offense. [00:57.500 --> 01:02.500] The Fifth guarantees due process, prohibits trying someone more than once for the same crime, [01:02.500 --> 01:04.500] and lets you keep your mouth shut. [01:04.500 --> 01:09.500] The Founding Fathers inserted these constitutional provisions to protect citizens from torture. [01:09.500 --> 01:14.000] Back in the day, governments often used painful methods to extract confessions. [01:14.000 --> 01:18.500] The Fifth Amendment also prohibits the government from taking your house and land without paying you for it. [01:18.500 --> 01:20.500] That used to happen a lot too. [01:20.500 --> 01:25.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.500 --> 01:35.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:35.500 --> 01:39.500] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:39.500 --> 01:41.500] Our liberty depends on it. [01:41.500 --> 01:47.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:47.500 --> 01:49.500] Privacy is under attack. [01:49.500 --> 01:52.500] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:52.500 --> 01:57.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:57.500 --> 02:02.500] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:02.500 --> 02:05.500] Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. [02:05.500 --> 02:08.500] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [02:08.500 --> 02:12.500] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.500 --> 02:15.500] Start over with StartPage. [02:15.500 --> 02:19.500] The number 666 reminds me of evil. [02:19.500 --> 02:24.500] I also associate it with the sick feeling one might get when falsely accused of a heinous crime [02:24.500 --> 02:28.500] or when thinking about sickos who actually do commit acts of murder and mayhem. [02:28.500 --> 02:32.500] Either way, the number 666 can help you remember that the Sixth Amendment [02:32.500 --> 02:37.500] deals with the constitutionally guaranteed rights Americans have in a criminal trial. [02:37.500 --> 02:41.500] Those include the right to a speedy public trial, the right to an impartial jury, [02:41.500 --> 02:45.500] the right to full information about the charges, the right to an attorney, [02:45.500 --> 02:48.500] and the right to confront any witnesses face to face. [02:48.500 --> 02:52.500] 666, sick, sickos, and the Sixth Amendment. Get it? [02:52.500 --> 03:12.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:22.500 --> 03:27.500] Whatcha gonna do? [03:27.500 --> 03:30.500] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:30.500 --> 03:32.500] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:32.500 --> 03:35.500] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:35.500 --> 03:38.500] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:38.500 --> 03:41.500] When you were eight and you had bad traits, [03:41.500 --> 03:43.500] you'd go to school and learn the golden rule. [03:43.500 --> 03:46.500] So why are you acting like a bloody fool? [03:46.500 --> 03:49.500] If you get caught in your master coup. [03:49.500 --> 03:51.500] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:51.500 --> 03:54.500] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:54.500 --> 03:57.500] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:57.500 --> 04:00.500] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [04:00.500 --> 04:02.500] You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one. [04:02.500 --> 04:05.500] You chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father. [04:05.500 --> 04:08.500] You chuck it on your brother and you chuck it on your sister. [04:08.500 --> 04:11.500] You chuck it on that one and you chuck it on me. [04:11.500 --> 04:15.500] Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio. [04:15.500 --> 04:18.500] No, no, not Brett Fountain. He's late. [04:18.500 --> 04:21.500] What the heck is this? He didn't show up on time. [04:21.500 --> 04:24.500] So when he gets here, I want everybody to call in [04:24.500 --> 04:28.500] and chastise him vigorously. [04:28.500 --> 04:31.500] He apparently had some other business [04:31.500 --> 04:36.500] and didn't consider us important enough to be here on time. [04:36.500 --> 04:43.500] But, and especially on this momentous occasion. [04:43.500 --> 04:47.500] Folks, when the pandemic hit [04:47.500 --> 04:51.500] and the government started shutting everything down [04:51.500 --> 04:56.500] and there's a lot of this talk about the Rockefellers [04:56.500 --> 04:59.500] and how this is a planned thing that's going on for a long time [04:59.500 --> 05:02.500] and how they're gonna take over the entire United States [05:02.500 --> 05:05.500] and change everything and doom and gloom [05:05.500 --> 05:09.500] and they stole the election from Trump [05:09.500 --> 05:13.500] and the world is falling into chaos. [05:13.500 --> 05:16.500] All of that is changing. [05:16.500 --> 05:21.500] SCOTUS, Supreme Court, to the rescue. [05:21.500 --> 05:24.500] And Brett's gonna be a little bit late when he gets here. [05:24.500 --> 05:29.500] I want to address this with Brett. [05:29.500 --> 05:32.500] What I see happening is the world is changing. [05:32.500 --> 05:35.500] Now I've talked about on this show [05:35.500 --> 05:43.500] that all through history, everything is always changing. [05:43.500 --> 05:47.500] Our founders did not intend for the United States [05:47.500 --> 05:49.500] to be a two-party system. [05:49.500 --> 05:53.500] They intended for at least three. [05:53.500 --> 05:57.500] But the bad guys got it down to two. [05:57.500 --> 06:02.500] And the appearance was that the same bad guys [06:02.500 --> 06:07.500] got control of both of those two parties. [06:07.500 --> 06:09.500] But I don't think that's the case. [06:09.500 --> 06:12.500] Something's happening. [06:12.500 --> 06:19.500] And I hope everybody appreciates what's going on. [06:19.500 --> 06:24.500] What in the heck is SCOTUS doing? [06:24.500 --> 06:32.500] The Supreme Court, they overturned the gun laws in New York [06:32.500 --> 06:36.500] as unconstitutional. [06:36.500 --> 06:43.500] And that, rooted by the Supreme, will apply to almost every other state. [06:43.500 --> 06:46.500] And then they overturned Roe v. Wade. [06:46.500 --> 06:52.500] Roe v. Wade, the most visible and controversial decision [06:52.500 --> 06:57.500] by the Supreme in 50 years. [06:57.500 --> 07:03.500] Roe v. Wade was constitutionally wrong when it was passed. [07:03.500 --> 07:12.500] And that's not a commentary on abortion one way or the other. [07:12.500 --> 07:17.500] Aside from abortion, I have an opinion on abortion, [07:17.500 --> 07:21.500] but if I set that opinion aside [07:21.500 --> 07:28.500] and look at the constitutionality of the Roe v. Wade ruling, [07:28.500 --> 07:35.500] Roe v. Wade, when it was ruled, it was wrong on its face [07:35.500 --> 07:41.500] because the federal government stepped into the states [07:41.500 --> 07:48.500] and interfered with rights that were left to the states. [07:48.500 --> 07:54.500] And that was the current ruling, that Roe v. Wade was wrong from the beginning. [07:54.500 --> 07:58.500] Not because pro-abortion, anti-abortion. [07:58.500 --> 08:03.500] Regardless of that, what can the federal government regulate [08:03.500 --> 08:06.500] and what can they not? [08:06.500 --> 08:13.500] And SCOTUS just said that the matter of abortions is a state issue. [08:13.500 --> 08:16.500] And it's important that we understand what state means. [08:16.500 --> 08:19.500] I keep addressing this over and over. [08:19.500 --> 08:35.500] State does not mean a jurisdictional body within a larger country. [08:35.500 --> 08:39.500] We think of the United States as a country. [08:39.500 --> 08:41.500] It's not a country. [08:41.500 --> 08:44.500] Never has been a country. [08:44.500 --> 08:56.500] The United States is a contractual agreement with 50 sovereign nations. [08:56.500 --> 09:01.500] State means sovereign nation. [09:01.500 --> 09:12.500] And the fed stepped into the state's business when they passed Roe v. Wade. [09:12.500 --> 09:17.500] And just recently, the fed has said, [09:17.500 --> 09:22.500] well, we never had power to step into the state in the beginning. [09:22.500 --> 09:27.500] And abortion is not an issue I'm here to address. [09:27.500 --> 09:30.500] The question is, [09:30.500 --> 09:42.500] I kind of understand why SCOTUS, the Supreme Court, passed Roe v. Wade 50 years ago [09:42.500 --> 09:48.500] because it was a popular, contentious issue, [09:48.500 --> 09:57.500] and they were trying to find a way to calm the tensions in the U.S. [09:57.500 --> 10:03.500] Why did they overturn it now? [10:03.500 --> 10:10.500] Why did they throw out the New York's gun laws, saying they were all unconstitutional? [10:10.500 --> 10:15.500] Some of the most restrictive gun laws in the nation. [10:15.500 --> 10:21.500] And now they're about to overturn the EPA regulations, [10:21.500 --> 10:30.500] saying that rules issued by a governmental agency are not law. [10:30.500 --> 10:36.500] That if those rules are to be applied to the general public, [10:36.500 --> 10:40.500] they must be passed by the legislature. [10:40.500 --> 10:43.500] SCOTUS hasn't done this yet, but they're about to. [10:43.500 --> 10:48.500] They've pretty well announced that they're going to do this. [10:48.500 --> 10:51.500] Think about it. [10:51.500 --> 10:55.500] They are pulling the teeth of the federal government. [10:55.500 --> 11:00.500] We've been complaining about federal overreach. [11:00.500 --> 11:12.500] And in the past, the courts have ruled that the rules passed by government agencies [11:12.500 --> 11:17.500] can't be overturned by the courts. [11:17.500 --> 11:19.500] This specifically went to the EPA. [11:19.500 --> 11:31.500] It was in a case where the EPA was regulating the filtering systems on exhaust chimneys [11:31.500 --> 11:36.500] and what could be exhausted into the environment. [11:36.500 --> 11:41.500] And it was about certain kinds of filters that must be in those [11:41.500 --> 11:44.500] to keep certain pollutants to getting out in the environment. [11:44.500 --> 11:48.500] And a federal judge overruled the EPA. [11:48.500 --> 11:52.500] And SCOTUS came in and said, wait a minute, wait a minute. [11:52.500 --> 11:57.500] You're a federal judge and you're not an expert in these matters. [11:57.500 --> 12:09.500] That the regulatory agencies are more specifically educated in the particulars of these issues [12:09.500 --> 12:19.500] and that it's inappropriate for the federal courts to overturn the rulings of federal agencies. [12:19.500 --> 12:24.500] Now that sounded rational and reasonable on the surface, [12:24.500 --> 12:37.500] but the effect that it had was to move control of all of these different issues from the legislature [12:37.500 --> 12:41.500] and give it to government agencies. [12:41.500 --> 12:45.500] That was wrong on its face. [12:45.500 --> 12:54.500] And now the Supreme is about to issue a ruling saying that the EPA regulations are unconstitutional [12:54.500 --> 12:59.500] because they were never passed by the legislature. [12:59.500 --> 13:08.500] They're going to demand that anything that affects the public must be passed by the legislature [13:08.500 --> 13:14.500] and that will pull the teeth of the Fed. [13:14.500 --> 13:23.500] For years we've had lots of complaining about overreach from the federal government. [13:23.500 --> 13:34.500] Consider what's going to happen when the Supreme Court rules that the rules passed by the EPA [13:34.500 --> 13:38.500] are not applicable to the public. [13:38.500 --> 13:44.500] That they can only apply to other governmental agencies. [13:44.500 --> 13:50.500] And anything that applies to the public must be passed by the legislature. [13:50.500 --> 13:54.500] Holy mackerel. [13:54.500 --> 13:59.500] It's going to throw everything into major chaos. [13:59.500 --> 14:05.500] The legislature is really going to have to jump up and get very busy [14:05.500 --> 14:13.500] and start passing all of these rules into law. [14:13.500 --> 14:19.500] It's going to create considerable chaos in the interim. [14:19.500 --> 14:25.500] We are looking at some very tumultuous times. [14:25.500 --> 14:30.500] And I was hoping Brett would be here. He was a little late getting here today. [14:30.500 --> 14:34.500] So we could discuss the ramifications of what I see coming. [14:34.500 --> 14:38.500] What in the heck is going on with the Supreme Court? [14:38.500 --> 14:46.500] It seems like they're doing everything they can to hammer Biden. [14:46.500 --> 14:50.500] To curtail the reach of the federal government. [14:50.500 --> 14:56.500] I mean everybody who has some kind of reason can look at what was going on and say, [14:56.500 --> 14:59.500] this is insane. [14:59.500 --> 15:06.500] You can't support 50% of the population with government money. [15:06.500 --> 15:11.500] All of these liberals that want to be protected from everything, [15:11.500 --> 15:17.500] they seem to have forgotten that everything has to be paid for. [15:17.500 --> 15:26.500] I just went to lunch yesterday that cost me $20 for lunch. [15:26.500 --> 15:31.500] Four and a half dollars a gallon for gas. [15:31.500 --> 15:38.500] If we're having to pay back all of these programs that were intended [15:38.500 --> 15:47.500] to help us through the pandemic that was created. [15:47.500 --> 15:55.500] I've said it on the air that I believe you've already lost this war. [15:55.500 --> 16:03.500] That it was won by the globalists before it even started. [16:03.500 --> 16:09.500] But it seems like SCOTUS is stepping up and giving us the tools [16:09.500 --> 16:13.500] we need to take the country back. [16:13.500 --> 16:17.500] To say that I'm excited is an understatement. [16:17.500 --> 16:23.500] I see great upheaval in the weeks and months to come [16:23.500 --> 16:28.500] and hope everybody is paying close attention. [16:28.500 --> 16:30.500] We're about to go to our sponsors. [16:30.500 --> 16:35.500] When we come back we'll take callers, the call board is full. [16:35.500 --> 16:39.500] I just wanted to get this out there because I'm amazed. [16:39.500 --> 16:44.500] I've never seen the Supreme Court so proactive [16:44.500 --> 16:48.500] to bring this pendulum back from the liberal side [16:48.500 --> 16:50.500] back to the conservative side. [16:50.500 --> 16:52.500] So I see good things to come. [16:52.500 --> 16:56.500] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio, [16:56.500 --> 17:00.500] we'll be right back. [17:26.500 --> 17:30.500] The Young Jeopardy! Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, [17:30.500 --> 17:32.500] most of which we reject. [17:32.500 --> 17:34.500] We have come to trust Young Jeopardy! so much [17:34.500 --> 17:40.500] we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [17:40.500 --> 17:43.500] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, [17:43.500 --> 17:47.500] your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [17:47.500 --> 17:52.500] As you realize the benefits of Young Jeopardy! you may want to join us. [17:52.500 --> 17:55.500] As a distributor you can experience improved health, [17:55.500 --> 17:59.500] help your friends and family, and increase your income. [17:59.500 --> 18:01.500] Order now. [18:01.500 --> 18:04.500] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God [18:04.500 --> 18:06.500] and a better understanding of His Word? [18:06.500 --> 18:09.500] Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays [18:09.500 --> 18:12.500] from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk [18:12.500 --> 18:15.500] where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures [18:15.500 --> 18:18.500] in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [18:18.500 --> 18:20.500] Study to show thyself approved unto God, [18:20.500 --> 18:22.500] a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, [18:22.500 --> 18:24.500] rightly dividing the Word of Truth. [18:24.500 --> 18:28.500] Starting in January our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark [18:28.500 --> 18:32.500] where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [18:32.500 --> 18:35.500] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week [18:35.500 --> 18:39.500] with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development. [18:39.500 --> 18:44.500] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [18:44.500 --> 18:47.500] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves [18:47.500 --> 18:50.500] more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [18:50.500 --> 18:54.500] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on logosradionetwork.com [18:54.500 --> 18:56.500] Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. [18:56.500 --> 19:22.500] to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [19:22.500 --> 19:27.500] Look one again, who reacts to Christians? [19:27.500 --> 19:32.500] You know what they are, they don't have answers. [19:32.500 --> 19:37.500] Open up your body, who reacts to Christians? [19:37.500 --> 19:42.500] Look one again, and they don't have answers. [19:42.500 --> 19:44.500] I'm so convinced inside. [19:44.500 --> 19:48.500] I don't have no issues to see Lord how the world will think it is easy. [19:48.500 --> 19:54.500] Okay, we are back. [19:54.500 --> 19:59.500] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue of La Radio on this Thursday, [19:59.500 --> 20:05.500] the 30th day of June 2022. [20:05.500 --> 20:10.500] And Brett, what in the world is going on with SCOTUS? [20:10.500 --> 20:15.500] It seems to me like it's SCOTUS to the rescue. [20:15.500 --> 20:19.500] Well, it's really encouraging, that's for sure. [20:19.500 --> 20:23.500] You see some things change in a pretty dramatic way. [20:23.500 --> 20:26.500] I'm looking forward to seeing how this unfolds. [20:26.500 --> 20:43.500] I thought it was pretty dramatic when the Supreme struck down the gun laws in New York. [20:43.500 --> 20:46.500] That was pretty radical. [20:46.500 --> 20:50.500] And then they struck down Roe v. Wade. [20:50.500 --> 20:53.500] Roe v. Wade was horribly wrong when it was passed, [20:53.500 --> 20:58.500] without regard to your opinion on abortion. [20:58.500 --> 21:01.500] If you set that aside, it's overreached. [21:01.500 --> 21:05.500] Just look at the ruling itself. [21:05.500 --> 21:11.500] Abortion is an issue that's relegated, that's left to the states. [21:11.500 --> 21:15.500] And the Fed never had any business entering into that issue. [21:15.500 --> 21:20.500] A couple of years ago, here in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, [21:20.500 --> 21:24.500] we have this large mall, Northeast Mall. [21:24.500 --> 21:29.500] And they wanted to extend their mall a quarter of a mile south, [21:29.500 --> 21:33.500] from Loop 820 down to Pipeline Road. [21:33.500 --> 21:35.500] Well, there's a big housing development there. [21:35.500 --> 21:37.500] Oh, I remember when they did that. [21:37.500 --> 21:46.500] And state law said that if a municipality can generate more tax revenue [21:46.500 --> 21:52.500] from commercial property than residential, [21:52.500 --> 21:59.500] they could condemn the residential property, zone it commercial, and force all the people out. [21:59.500 --> 22:03.500] Well, all of these people took us all the way to the Supreme. [22:03.500 --> 22:09.500] And the Supreme ruled, and had all of these patriots just railing in righteous indignation [22:09.500 --> 22:16.500] that the Supreme was allowing the state to steal this property from all of these people [22:16.500 --> 22:19.500] and deny them of their property rights. [22:19.500 --> 22:22.500] And then I read the ruling. [22:22.500 --> 22:28.500] And the ruling said that in Texas, Texas law says that if a municipality [22:28.500 --> 22:35.500] can generate more tax revenue from commercial property than residential, [22:35.500 --> 22:40.500] they could condemn residential property, zone it commercial, [22:40.500 --> 22:45.500] and force, you know, allow commercial development. [22:45.500 --> 22:47.500] Yeah, exactly what they did. [22:47.500 --> 22:50.500] So the feds couldn't interfere. [22:50.500 --> 22:54.500] And what the feds said, we're not going to interfere with state law. [22:54.500 --> 22:59.500] If you don't like the law, change it. [22:59.500 --> 23:05.500] But don't ask us to step into the state and interfere with state rights. [23:05.500 --> 23:10.500] And for me, I said that was exactly the perfect ruling. [23:10.500 --> 23:14.500] And that's what the ruling should have been on Roe v. Wade. [23:14.500 --> 23:17.500] But it wasn't. [23:17.500 --> 23:21.500] The ruling was passed back in the 60s. [23:21.500 --> 23:29.500] The Civil Rights Movement and the SCOTUS overstepped its bounds then. [23:29.500 --> 23:36.500] And all during that time, there has been case after case after case [23:36.500 --> 23:43.500] petition to the Supreme, and they refused to hear it, trying to overturn SCOTUS. [23:43.500 --> 23:46.500] I'm sorry, trying to overturn Roe v. Wade. [23:46.500 --> 23:56.500] Why at this time, at this moment, did they throw out the gun laws in New York? [23:56.500 --> 23:58.500] That's the one that shocked me the most. [23:58.500 --> 24:05.500] Yeah. And then the next day, they throw out Roe v. Wade, [24:05.500 --> 24:15.500] and now they're preparing to throw out the EPA, the rules made by federal agencies. [24:15.500 --> 24:17.500] And we've all talked about this on the air, [24:17.500 --> 24:22.500] about the federal government intruding into state business, [24:22.500 --> 24:32.500] like the restriction when California made pot legal. [24:32.500 --> 24:36.500] Ashcroft came in and arrested everybody [24:36.500 --> 24:44.500] because they were a claim of interfering with the interstate commerce. [24:44.500 --> 24:47.500] It was a gross overstep of the federal government, [24:47.500 --> 24:52.500] and everybody complained about government overreach. [24:52.500 --> 24:56.500] But SCOTUS didn't do anything. [24:56.500 --> 25:01.500] Why now? Why at this moment? [25:01.500 --> 25:05.500] We're at this pivotal point. [25:05.500 --> 25:11.500] We have an interim election coming in November. [25:11.500 --> 25:19.500] The Democrats took over the election, [25:19.500 --> 25:23.500] and they've instituted all of these liberal policies. [25:23.500 --> 25:28.500] They paid people not to work. [25:28.500 --> 25:33.500] Now we have all these businesses that can't get help. [25:33.500 --> 25:37.500] I just paid $20 for lunch. [25:37.500 --> 25:39.500] Yeah, it's crazy. [25:39.500 --> 25:44.500] I remember $3, then $4, then $5, [25:44.500 --> 25:53.500] and it went from $5 to $12 to $15 to $20 in quick succession. [25:53.500 --> 26:02.500] The Democrats gave all this what Deborah called angel dust, [26:02.500 --> 26:06.500] the COVID epidemic, and they paid all of these people not to work. [26:06.500 --> 26:09.500] And all these folks thought, well, we can do all of this [26:09.500 --> 26:13.500] and never have to pay it back. [26:13.500 --> 26:18.500] Well, surprise, surprise, we have to pay it back. [26:18.500 --> 26:22.500] All of you folks who couldn't afford to pay your rent [26:22.500 --> 26:27.500] or buy groceries and take care of your children, how are you doing now? [26:27.500 --> 26:29.500] All the angel dust is gone, [26:29.500 --> 26:35.500] and now we're having to pay it back at pushing $5 a gallon for gas. [26:35.500 --> 26:37.500] How's that working out for you? [26:37.500 --> 26:41.500] I just put $120 in my tank, [26:41.500 --> 26:46.500] and I had a quarter of a tank when I plugged it in. [26:46.500 --> 26:49.500] So how is all this angel dust affecting you now? [26:49.500 --> 26:54.500] The conservative side was saying, you can't do this. [26:54.500 --> 26:58.500] You have to pay it back one time, sometime or another. [26:58.500 --> 27:07.500] And the Democrats, the pendulum swung to the blue side big time, [27:07.500 --> 27:12.500] and it appears as though SCOTUS just swung it back to the red side. [27:12.500 --> 27:16.500] Am I missing something, Brett? [27:16.500 --> 27:18.500] No, I don't think so. [27:18.500 --> 27:21.500] It looks to me like exactly what's going on. [27:21.500 --> 27:23.500] You're trying to hit the brakes. [27:23.500 --> 27:25.500] You hit the brakes on this train. [27:25.500 --> 27:29.500] Yeah, I got the impression that SCOTUS is doing everything they can [27:29.500 --> 27:34.500] to undermine Biden, that they recognize what's going on, [27:34.500 --> 27:37.500] they recognize this is insane, and they've done. [27:37.500 --> 27:39.500] They're doing everything they can. [27:39.500 --> 27:42.500] And this is this thing of the EPA. [27:42.500 --> 27:44.500] Well, I'm sure when you say Biden, [27:44.500 --> 27:47.500] you mean everything crazy that the administration is doing [27:47.500 --> 27:49.500] that he probably doesn't even know about. [27:49.500 --> 27:55.500] Exactly, that they recognize the problem coming, [27:55.500 --> 28:02.500] and they see that it is my belief that Biden is trying to undermine [28:02.500 --> 28:11.500] the U.S. currency so that the primary currency can move [28:11.500 --> 28:16.500] from U.S. currency to the yuan, to China. [28:16.500 --> 28:21.500] Then it's clear that Biden has all kinds of contacts with China. [28:21.500 --> 28:29.500] I think SCOTUS just threw a monkey wrench in their works. [28:29.500 --> 28:35.500] Now, everybody who listens knows that I generally don't talk about politics here. [28:35.500 --> 28:43.500] It's about law, but what I see coming is absolutely incredible. [28:43.500 --> 28:49.500] What do you think, Brett? [28:49.500 --> 28:53.500] Well, I think you're right, and I also think that it has to do with law. [28:53.500 --> 28:57.500] I mean, it's tangential, I guess, but there's a connection. [28:57.500 --> 29:02.500] One's tied to the other. [29:02.500 --> 29:07.500] And I'm just wondering, what's going to happen when they rule [29:07.500 --> 29:11.500] that the EPA's rules are unconstitutional? [29:11.500 --> 29:18.500] That means the SEC's rules and the ATS rules [29:18.500 --> 29:22.500] and everybody's rules are unconstitutional. [29:22.500 --> 29:25.500] There's going to be this vacuum. [29:25.500 --> 29:30.500] When the rulings come down and all of the rules are out at the window, [29:30.500 --> 29:35.500] there's going to be this time period between throwing out all the rules [29:35.500 --> 29:44.500] and giving the legislature opportunity to convert those rules into legislation. [29:44.500 --> 29:48.500] We're looking at some major chaos. [29:48.500 --> 29:51.500] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll have our radio. [29:51.500 --> 29:54.500] When we come back, we'll start taking your calls. [29:54.500 --> 29:56.500] Call in numbers. No, I'm not going to give it out. [29:56.500 --> 30:01.500] We've got a full board. We'll be right back. [30:01.500 --> 30:06.500] Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information, and you may trust them to keep it safe. [30:06.500 --> 30:11.500] But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your secrets. [30:11.500 --> 30:15.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with details. [30:15.500 --> 30:17.500] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.500 --> 30:20.500] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:20.500 --> 30:25.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [30:25.500 --> 30:30.500] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [30:30.500 --> 30:33.500] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.500 --> 30:36.500] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [30:36.500 --> 30:40.500] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:40.500 --> 30:44.500] Start over with Startpage. [30:44.500 --> 30:51.500] Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle your personal information. [30:51.500 --> 30:53.500] But what happens if it escapes their control? [30:53.500 --> 30:55.500] It's not an idle question. [30:55.500 --> 31:03.500] According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was breached by hackers in the last year. [31:03.500 --> 31:07.500] That's one more reason you should trust your searches to Startpage.com. [31:07.500 --> 31:11.500] Unlike other search engines, Startpage doesn't store any data on you. [31:11.500 --> 31:15.500] They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals to see. [31:15.500 --> 31:17.500] The cupboard would be bare. [31:17.500 --> 31:21.500] Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way. [31:21.500 --> 31:30.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:30.500 --> 31:35.500] I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001. [31:35.500 --> 31:39.500] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11. [31:39.500 --> 31:43.500] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. [31:43.500 --> 31:47.500] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, [31:47.500 --> 31:52.500] 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story. [31:52.500 --> 31:55.500] Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. [31:55.500 --> 32:01.500] Go to buildingwhat.org. Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [32:01.500 --> 32:05.500] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [32:05.500 --> 32:07.500] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [32:07.500 --> 32:12.500] If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:12.500 --> 32:15.500] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [32:15.500 --> 32:19.500] the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:19.500 --> 32:25.500] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [32:25.500 --> 32:28.500] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [32:28.500 --> 32:33.500] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is [32:33.500 --> 32:35.500] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:35.500 --> 32:40.500] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:40.500 --> 32:44.500] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie. [32:44.500 --> 32:50.500] Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [32:50.500 --> 32:54.500] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:54.500 --> 33:14.500] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:14.500 --> 33:25.500] Mr. Officer, you're taking the law in your hand. Won't you follow the law of the land? I don't understand. [33:25.500 --> 33:45.500] The law is to protect our service. Not beat our abuse. Mr. Officer! [33:45.500 --> 33:56.500] When you're going to stop abuse, you call our words. When you're going to stop abuse, you call our words. [33:56.500 --> 34:01.500] So please, Mr. Michael, teach officers not to abuse their power. [34:01.500 --> 34:07.500] Send a request to the leader, the captain of all officers. [34:07.500 --> 34:18.500] Tell them to uphold the law and please don't abuse their power. The beat and the beat and the cheat and the cheat and the light every hour. [34:18.500 --> 34:30.500] So Mr. Officer, please stop abusing your power. You pulled me over. I tell you to be silent, sir. [34:30.500 --> 34:39.500] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this, the 30th day of June, 2022. [34:39.500 --> 34:46.500] And we're going to go to Eric in Massachusetts, Massachussets. [34:46.500 --> 34:51.500] Pastor Massa tried to teach me how to say Massachussets, but I never got it right. [34:51.500 --> 34:53.500] You got to make sure you put enough S's in there. [34:53.500 --> 34:57.500] Did I get enough S's in there, Eric? [34:57.500 --> 35:03.500] Almost, almost. A lot of times you hear people say Massachussets. [35:03.500 --> 35:06.500] So it's too many T's and not enough S's. [35:06.500 --> 35:10.500] Yes. I want to say Massachussets. [35:10.500 --> 35:13.500] Pastor Massa informed me that it was... [35:13.500 --> 35:16.500] I'm not sure why people say that, but they do. [35:16.500 --> 35:24.500] It was Wooster, not Worcestershire. Wooster. It took him a month to teach me how to say Wooster. [35:24.500 --> 35:28.500] Wooster Massachussets. [35:28.500 --> 35:31.500] It's an N's and an A, Wooster. [35:31.500 --> 35:35.500] Okay. What do you have for us today? [35:35.500 --> 35:38.500] Wait a minute, Eric. Are you a first-time caller? [35:38.500 --> 35:40.500] I am, I am. [35:40.500 --> 35:46.500] Okay, because you were...Deborah screened and put you in our database, so it wasn't clear to me that you were. [35:46.500 --> 35:49.500] Okay. What do you have for us today? [35:49.500 --> 35:55.500] Okay. I've been talking a little bit with, I think, one of your associates, Alex, about this case. [35:55.500 --> 36:01.500] So I've been fighting the City of Boston, their variance laws. [36:01.500 --> 36:05.500] So they've done a massive development in my area. [36:05.500 --> 36:09.500] And I've been trying to figure out how to stop them from overdeveloping. [36:09.500 --> 36:16.500] So you have zoning rules, zoning laws that basically are meant to limit development. [36:16.500 --> 36:22.500] And in my neighborhood, they've approved over 12,000 apartments, [36:22.500 --> 36:29.500] which would be increasing the population in my neighborhood about 40 percent, which ultimately is probably not doable. [36:29.500 --> 36:31.500] So I've done a number of cases. [36:31.500 --> 36:33.500] Okay. Hold on. [36:33.500 --> 36:45.500] Anyone who's not driven around in Massachusetts, like specifically Boston, you might not appreciate his concern. [36:45.500 --> 36:53.500] I was going to Boston and talked to several people, and they all told me, you're going to get lost in Boston. [36:53.500 --> 36:57.500] And they were right. I got lost in Boston. [36:57.500 --> 37:03.500] All these tiny little narrow streets going in all kinds of different directions. [37:03.500 --> 37:12.500] You start increasing the population in Boston, it's going to get ugly. [37:12.500 --> 37:13.500] Okay. Go ahead. [37:13.500 --> 37:17.500] We're a state that only grows a half a percent annually. [37:17.500 --> 37:27.500] So how they're going to increase my neighborhood or even Metro Boston 20, 30 percent over a 10-year time period is just not doable. [37:27.500 --> 37:31.500] Okay. Hold on. Hold on. What's going on? [37:31.500 --> 37:35.500] Why is Massachusetts increasing population? [37:35.500 --> 37:40.500] Well, it's just like the late 80s where they're not increasing population. [37:40.500 --> 37:42.500] They're just overbuilding. [37:42.500 --> 37:51.500] So it's like what happened in the late 80s, like in Dallas, where they overbuilt, you know, office buildings. [37:51.500 --> 37:55.500] Wait a minute. Wait a minute. I was here in Dallas when that was happening. [37:55.500 --> 38:03.500] And I was driving around looking at all this construction, and I was thinking, this is insane. [38:03.500 --> 38:04.500] Me too. [38:04.500 --> 38:10.500] All of this, this economy is growing on growth. [38:10.500 --> 38:21.500] It's building high rises and warehouse development centers, and there's nobody to fill them up. [38:21.500 --> 38:26.500] And then in 1985, everything crashed. [38:26.500 --> 38:41.500] And we sent out the Dallas-Fort Worth area, put together this group to go out and bring in business and authorize them to give some incredible tax relief. [38:41.500 --> 38:50.500] And they brought all kinds of business from the East Coast and the Northeast down into Texas because the taxes were so much better. [38:50.500 --> 39:00.500] And everybody here just railed in righteous indignation, oh, you're giving all our tax money away to these companies from other places. [39:00.500 --> 39:06.500] Well, all of this overbuilding, they filled up. [39:06.500 --> 39:22.500] And even though these companies got tax breaks, they brought in so much business that right now, the Texas economy is one of the most powerful economies on the planet. [39:22.500 --> 39:29.500] But Massachusetts, that's old industry. [39:29.500 --> 39:37.500] They've had a long time to increase the tax rates on everybody. [39:37.500 --> 39:45.500] Is there something going on in Massachusetts that will give business from other places like New York? [39:45.500 --> 39:49.500] New York has just been decimated. [39:49.500 --> 40:00.500] I drove from Albany to upstate New York, where Pastor Massad is, 120 miles along the Erie Canal. [40:00.500 --> 40:06.500] Huge factory buildings, five, six-story factory buildings, all boarded up. [40:06.500 --> 40:10.500] Never saw the first barge on the Erie Canal. [40:10.500 --> 40:18.500] Someone gave Pastor Massad a $30,000 three-story building, free, just take it. [40:18.500 --> 40:25.500] But it would cost another $35,000 to bring it up to fair market value, and it wasn't worth it. [40:25.500 --> 40:27.500] He didn't even want it. [40:27.500 --> 40:33.500] They have overtaxed New York to the point that business is flooding out of there. [40:33.500 --> 40:36.500] How is Massachusetts different? [40:36.500 --> 40:47.500] If they're building all these new apartments and other structures, Eric, how are they going to fill them? [40:47.500 --> 40:53.500] They're not, unless they fill them with, I hate to say it, illegal immigrants, [40:53.500 --> 40:59.500] meaning that they intentionally are building them for some nefarious reason. [40:59.500 --> 41:02.500] It just doesn't make sense. [41:02.500 --> 41:07.500] What happened in the late 80s is somebody turned on the machine at the bank, [41:07.500 --> 41:11.500] hey, do you just keep building until we tell you to stop? [41:11.500 --> 41:16.500] Somebody had to throw a wrench in the machine to get it to stop, and that's where we're at right now. [41:16.500 --> 41:21.500] I can sort of see the wrench coming because the banks are starting to tighten up, [41:21.500 --> 41:26.500] and construction is going to stop, but the damage has already been done. [41:26.500 --> 41:28.500] Again, we're not a growing area. [41:28.500 --> 41:30.500] We're a barely growing area. [41:30.500 --> 41:35.500] If not, the last two years have decreased because of COVID. [41:35.500 --> 41:39.500] Texas is huge. [41:39.500 --> 41:40.500] We're large. [41:40.500 --> 41:43.500] We've got space everywhere. [41:43.500 --> 41:45.500] Boston doesn't. [41:45.500 --> 41:46.500] No, no. [41:46.500 --> 41:50.500] For people like myself who like old things, it's a great area. [41:50.500 --> 41:53.500] I love driving around New England. [41:53.500 --> 41:57.500] It's very much like England, Europe. [41:57.500 --> 42:02.500] It's a pleasure to be here, but it's not a growing area, and it is overtaxed, [42:02.500 --> 42:06.500] and it is expensive, and it's not drawing in a lot of people. [42:06.500 --> 42:09.500] To answer part of your question, what is Boston doing? [42:09.500 --> 42:17.500] Well, Boston is a tech center, it is a university center, and they have a lot of [42:17.500 --> 42:24.500] medical, biomedical, and the robots, and AI, and et cetera, but is that a large [42:24.500 --> 42:26.500] growth in population? [42:26.500 --> 42:27.500] Not necessarily. [42:27.500 --> 42:32.500] I don't think you can get that many people to kind of move based on that, [42:32.500 --> 42:34.500] and then we're not New York City. [42:34.500 --> 42:37.500] We're a small town, really. [42:37.500 --> 42:43.500] It's a city, right, but the population of Boston is probably one-tenth of New [42:43.500 --> 42:45.500] York City. [42:45.500 --> 42:46.500] Literally one-tenth. [42:46.500 --> 42:47.500] We're 600,000. [42:47.500 --> 42:51.500] They're easily six million. [42:51.500 --> 42:54.500] You don't have any space. [42:54.500 --> 42:55.500] Right, right. [42:55.500 --> 42:58.500] Well, I mean, you can build up, but that doesn't mean people are going to live [42:58.500 --> 42:59.500] there. [42:59.500 --> 43:03.500] Let's get back to sort of my question, if I can. [43:03.500 --> 43:08.500] So they created these zoning rules to limit growth, right? [43:08.500 --> 43:14.500] And what's super interesting about it is the zoning laws weren't created until [43:14.500 --> 43:21.500] 1991, and what is unique about it is the mayor at the time set up a community [43:21.500 --> 43:27.500] group for all the neighborhoods and said, all right, you are going to work with [43:27.500 --> 43:32.500] the city and develop these zoning laws, and it was over a five-year time period. [43:32.500 --> 43:36.500] Okay, hold on, hold on. [43:36.500 --> 43:40.500] We're about to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio. [43:40.500 --> 43:45.500] Now I'm going to give out the call-in number. [43:45.500 --> 43:47.500] We have a full board of callers. [43:47.500 --> 43:54.500] So when someone drops off, then you can call in 512-646-1984. [43:54.500 --> 43:56.500] I said I wasn't going to do that. [43:56.500 --> 43:57.500] I'm confused. [43:57.500 --> 43:58.500] Hang on. [43:58.500 --> 44:02.500] I love Logos. [44:02.500 --> 44:04.500] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [44:04.500 --> 44:07.500] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [44:07.500 --> 44:08.500] I need my truth pick. [44:08.500 --> 44:12.500] I'd be lost without Logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the [44:12.500 --> 44:13.500] air. [44:13.500 --> 44:16.500] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I [44:16.500 --> 44:19.500] really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [44:19.500 --> 44:21.500] How can I help Logos? [44:21.500 --> 44:23.500] Well, I'm glad you asked. [44:23.500 --> 44:26.500] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos. [44:26.500 --> 44:30.500] When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, the first thing you do is clear [44:30.500 --> 44:31.500] your cookies. [44:31.500 --> 44:34.500] Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. [44:34.500 --> 44:37.500] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [44:37.500 --> 44:41.500] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and Logos gets a [44:41.500 --> 44:42.500] few pesos. [44:42.500 --> 44:43.500] Do I pay extra? [44:43.500 --> 44:44.500] No. [44:44.500 --> 44:46.500] Do you have to do anything different when I order? [44:46.500 --> 44:47.500] No. [44:47.500 --> 44:48.500] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [44:48.500 --> 44:49.500] No. [44:49.500 --> 44:50.500] I mean, yes. [44:50.500 --> 44:51.500] Wow. [44:51.500 --> 44:53.500] Giving without doing anything or spending any money. [44:53.500 --> 44:54.500] This is perfect. [44:54.500 --> 44:56.500] Thank you so much. [44:56.500 --> 44:57.500] We are welcome. [44:57.500 --> 45:00.500] Happy holidays, Logos. [45:00.500 --> 45:03.500] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:03.500 --> 45:09.500] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand [45:09.500 --> 45:14.500] four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [45:14.500 --> 45:18.500] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:18.500 --> 45:22.500] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:22.500 --> 45:27.500] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [45:27.500 --> 45:33.500] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [45:33.500 --> 45:38.500] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about [45:38.500 --> 45:42.500] the principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:42.500 --> 45:49.500] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:49.500 --> 45:52.500] pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.500 --> 46:20.500] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EASY. [46:20.500 --> 46:25.500] If you could not wait any longer, what would your purpose have to be done? [46:25.500 --> 46:29.500] Would you stand up and be a soldier, a warrior or a club? [46:29.500 --> 46:31.500] Would you scuffle and keep your peace? [46:31.500 --> 46:51.500] All they're taking is a misunderstanding if somebody calls the police. [46:51.500 --> 47:06.500] Okay, we are back. [47:06.500 --> 47:11.500] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Eric in Massachusetts. [47:11.500 --> 47:15.500] Massachusetts, okay. [47:15.500 --> 47:20.500] Let's go to your actual question and issue. [47:20.500 --> 47:22.500] All right, so where I left off. [47:22.500 --> 47:31.500] In 1991, the mayor with a community group in each neighborhood designed the zoning laws. [47:31.500 --> 47:39.500] And in doing so, they made a dual party, two signature agreement. [47:39.500 --> 47:44.500] The zoning laws are signed by the community, a committee, and the mayor. [47:44.500 --> 47:50.500] So one of the important questions that I have is, is this a contract? [47:50.500 --> 47:57.500] And how do I get a court to recognize it as a contract? [47:57.500 --> 48:01.500] Because that is extremely unique, as I understand it, in zoning laws. [48:01.500 --> 48:07.500] And I can't get a lawyer or even a superior court judge to give me an opinion on that. [48:07.500 --> 48:08.500] Wow. [48:08.500 --> 48:10.500] That's my first question. [48:10.500 --> 48:14.500] I have no idea how to answer that one. [48:14.500 --> 48:24.500] Most jurisdictions have adopted the universal building codes. [48:24.500 --> 48:29.500] Did Boston do that? [48:29.500 --> 48:30.500] That I don't know. [48:30.500 --> 48:32.500] I mean, there's still zoning laws. [48:32.500 --> 48:36.500] So it's like, you know, in this area, this street, you can build only three story buildings. [48:36.500 --> 48:39.500] And in this area, you can only have single family homes. [48:39.500 --> 48:41.500] Those are the zoning. [48:41.500 --> 48:42.500] Okay. [48:42.500 --> 48:43.500] I'm sorry. [48:43.500 --> 48:44.500] I misinterpreted. [48:44.500 --> 48:45.500] This is not building code. [48:45.500 --> 48:47.500] This is zoning. [48:47.500 --> 48:52.500] Zoning, yeah. [48:52.500 --> 48:54.500] I'm not sure how to address that. [48:54.500 --> 48:57.500] Brett, do you know? [48:57.500 --> 48:59.500] No, that's out of scope for me. [48:59.500 --> 49:02.500] I've never looked into any of that stuff. [49:02.500 --> 49:07.500] Is zoning directly a contract between who? [49:07.500 --> 49:11.500] So every town would set up their own zoning code. [49:11.500 --> 49:19.500] And what's interesting also is Boston is unique in that their zoning laws are unique unto [49:19.500 --> 49:21.500] Boston, unto themselves. [49:21.500 --> 49:28.500] The rest of the state, they follow the state of Massachusetts zoning laws and write rules [49:28.500 --> 49:33.500] and regulations in terms of how variances are done or how things are done or whatever. [49:33.500 --> 49:34.500] But Boston is unique. [49:34.500 --> 49:36.500] They have their own. [49:36.500 --> 49:41.500] And again, these zoning rules, I say, are also unique. [49:41.500 --> 49:49.500] And it has to be unusual that you would have a two-party signed agreement like this for [49:49.500 --> 49:50.500] the zoning rules. [49:50.500 --> 49:55.500] Normally, a city would say, all right, this is how we're going to develop it, right? [49:55.500 --> 50:02.500] And I don't think anybody remembers that these rules are signed by two parties. [50:02.500 --> 50:09.500] I just don't, because it was so long ago, 30 years ago, I don't think they realize it. [50:09.500 --> 50:15.500] So I had to, you know, FOIA request these documents in hopes that they were two-party [50:15.500 --> 50:17.500] signed, which they are. [50:17.500 --> 50:25.500] Do you have evidence to indicate that the zoning has been addressed unilaterally? [50:25.500 --> 50:30.500] What do you mean by unilaterally? [50:30.500 --> 50:39.500] So one guy is appointed to head up zoning and he says, okay, we're going to do it this [50:39.500 --> 50:40.500] way. [50:40.500 --> 50:42.500] And it's done that way. [50:42.500 --> 50:44.500] But it doesn't get agreement from the other side. [50:44.500 --> 50:47.500] It doesn't give any other party to sign off on it. [50:47.500 --> 50:48.500] Yeah. [50:48.500 --> 50:55.500] So if I understood this right, you're saying that Boston requires two parties. [50:55.500 --> 51:00.500] So has Boston been bypassing the two-party agreement? [51:00.500 --> 51:08.500] No, what I'm saying is this agreement is like your Sprint, let's say you had a Sprint [51:08.500 --> 51:10.500] telephone service agreement, right? [51:10.500 --> 51:18.500] So the president of the Sprint signs it and then you sign it and says, for $100 a month, [51:18.500 --> 51:20.500] you get unlimited service, right? [51:20.500 --> 51:24.500] And then a new president comes in and goes, well, we can't do that anymore. [51:24.500 --> 51:25.500] So he tries to change it. [51:25.500 --> 51:28.500] He tries to change the rules, right? [51:28.500 --> 51:34.500] So now he wants to charge you $200 and you say, well, look, I got a contract here. [51:34.500 --> 51:36.500] You can't change these rules. [51:36.500 --> 51:42.500] So basically the mayor is the one who sort of puts pressure on the zoning board to say, [51:42.500 --> 51:48.500] hey, you start pumping developers through here, through this process. [51:48.500 --> 51:54.500] I want to grow 20%. [51:54.500 --> 51:57.500] So the first two mayors didn't do all the development. [51:57.500 --> 52:05.500] When we got another mayor 14 years later, or no, more like 25 years later, he started [52:05.500 --> 52:10.500] developing in all the neighborhoods against all of the zoning laws. [52:10.500 --> 52:15.500] The zoning laws at that point no longer made any, they didn't matter. [52:15.500 --> 52:23.500] And when people like me challenge them, basically the Massachusetts courts ignore them. [52:23.500 --> 52:26.500] Ignore the fact that those zoning rules apply. [52:26.500 --> 52:29.500] And they basically say, you don't have standing. [52:29.500 --> 52:34.500] So the Superior Court, then the Appeals Court, and then even the Supreme Court has said to [52:34.500 --> 52:43.500] me, you don't have standing, which basically is not allowing me my due process or not [52:43.500 --> 52:46.500] allowing due process. [52:46.500 --> 52:51.500] Anything you say, anything you say, we cannot hear because you don't have standing. [52:51.500 --> 52:54.500] And beyond that, we don't care. [52:54.500 --> 52:56.500] Who does have standing? [52:56.500 --> 52:58.500] Well, nobody then. [52:58.500 --> 52:59.500] Nobody has standing. [52:59.500 --> 53:02.500] The only person who has standing is the mayor because he's the one who says, hey, [53:02.500 --> 53:07.500] zoning board, you better start signing all these variances that I want to grow. [53:07.500 --> 53:13.500] Okay, you started out speaking to a two-party system. [53:13.500 --> 53:16.500] What happened to that? [53:16.500 --> 53:18.500] Well, that's my issue. [53:18.500 --> 53:25.500] How do I take it to a court and say to them, hey, this is a two-party signed agreement? [53:25.500 --> 53:26.500] This is unique. [53:26.500 --> 53:33.500] The Boston zoning laws are unique, and the Boston zoning code is unique. [53:33.500 --> 53:35.500] It's a two-party signed agreement. [53:35.500 --> 53:40.500] And you refuse to hear this because you want to put your hands over your ears and your [53:40.500 --> 53:42.500] eyes and say, we don't care. [53:42.500 --> 53:43.500] You don't have standing. [53:43.500 --> 53:48.500] And there's no way to get standing. [53:48.500 --> 53:51.500] This is way too complex. [53:51.500 --> 53:53.500] I know, unfortunately. [53:53.500 --> 53:55.500] Yeah, this is not something I could speak to. [53:55.500 --> 53:57.500] It's not a general issue. [53:57.500 --> 54:02.500] It's so specific to Boston law. [54:02.500 --> 54:07.500] I would have to study the codes to figure this one out. [54:07.500 --> 54:10.500] It really comes down to contract law. [54:10.500 --> 54:16.500] Is there a way to prove to the court, this is where I want to take it to the federal [54:16.500 --> 54:18.500] level, and I don't know how to do that. [54:18.500 --> 54:25.500] If it's a habeas corpus, it's a habeas mandus or a mandus, if it's one of those petitions [54:25.500 --> 54:35.500] to the federal court or whether it's some type of judicial request where I'm asking [54:35.500 --> 54:40.500] them to give me an opinion on this, I have to take it to the federal court because basically [54:40.500 --> 54:45.500] the state court, all they do is put their hands over their eyes and their ears and say, [54:45.500 --> 54:46.500] you don't have standing. [54:46.500 --> 54:48.500] We don't care what they do to the building next to you. [54:48.500 --> 54:51.500] We don't care if they put a nuclear power plant next to your house. [54:51.500 --> 54:53.500] You don't have standing. [54:53.500 --> 54:55.500] That's basically what they're going to do. [54:55.500 --> 55:00.500] But they refuse to look at the fact, hey, this is a two-party signed contract. [55:00.500 --> 55:03.500] You can't do that. [55:03.500 --> 55:05.500] It's a super existing case. [55:05.500 --> 55:10.500] Have you looked at the petition for declaratory judgment? [55:10.500 --> 55:12.500] Yes. [55:12.500 --> 55:15.500] That's one of my questions. [55:15.500 --> 55:20.500] Is that how I take it to the federal court or do I take it to... [55:20.500 --> 55:24.500] You can ask the federal, I don't know if this will get to the federal court. [55:24.500 --> 55:32.500] These are, you're speaking to issues that are specifically state issues. [55:32.500 --> 55:38.500] Yeah, but if they're starting to violate other issues, like I could file basically on some [55:38.500 --> 55:47.500] of these things ADA complaints because they're not upholding the American Disability Act issues. [55:47.500 --> 55:52.500] Yeah, but that's a stretch to get back to zoning. [55:52.500 --> 56:01.500] Well, if I file an ADA complaint and some type of RICO and this and that, and in amongst [56:01.500 --> 56:06.500] that, one of my issues is, hey, this is a two-party contract. [56:06.500 --> 56:07.500] I don't... [56:07.500 --> 56:12.500] Yeah, the issue of parties stands out to me as being a really good one to address because [56:12.500 --> 56:17.500] like Randy was saying about unilateral, if there's something that they're calling a contract [56:17.500 --> 56:23.500] or they're relying on it as if it's a contract and it's only got one side of the agreement, [56:23.500 --> 56:27.500] you can't really legitimately call that an agreement of any kind. [56:27.500 --> 56:30.500] Well, I'm the one who's calling it a contract. [56:30.500 --> 56:35.500] I'm hoping that it's a contract because then I can hold them to the contract. [56:35.500 --> 56:36.500] Exactly. [56:36.500 --> 56:39.500] Otherwise, there's no way to do it. [56:39.500 --> 56:47.500] So again, my initial thought is to go to the federal court with some type of habeas or [56:47.500 --> 56:49.500] a mandamus or something. [56:49.500 --> 56:53.500] How do you get to a federal nexus? [56:53.500 --> 56:58.500] That's why I'm on this phone call with you. [56:58.500 --> 56:59.500] I can't... [56:59.500 --> 57:04.500] I'm thinking, I'm trying to think, how can I get to the Fed? [57:04.500 --> 57:12.500] How can I find a federal right that's being violated when you're speaking to things that [57:12.500 --> 57:15.500] are specifically state issues? [57:15.500 --> 57:19.500] Well, a contract is above the constitution, isn't it? [57:19.500 --> 57:20.500] No. [57:20.500 --> 57:21.500] And if these courts... [57:21.500 --> 57:22.500] No, no. [57:22.500 --> 57:24.500] It's not above. [57:24.500 --> 57:26.500] It's a side. [57:26.500 --> 57:36.500] The Sixth Amendment simply says that the government cannot interfere with the obligations of contracts. [57:36.500 --> 57:37.500] But... [57:37.500 --> 57:44.500] The constitution being restrictions on government and contracts being in demand. [57:44.500 --> 57:45.500] Yeah. [57:45.500 --> 57:47.500] And that's federal. [57:47.500 --> 57:52.500] So that's telling the federal government to butt out. [57:52.500 --> 57:56.500] Okay. I mean, again, that's why we're having this discussion, because I just don't know [57:56.500 --> 57:57.500] how to handle this. [57:57.500 --> 58:01.500] I know I'm right, but I don't know how to get there. [58:01.500 --> 58:02.500] Yeah. [58:02.500 --> 58:03.500] I don't have... [58:03.500 --> 58:08.500] We don't have enough information to be able to speak intelligently to it, because this [58:08.500 --> 58:14.500] is so particular to New Jersey and New Jersey law. [58:14.500 --> 58:22.500] I can't... nothing you've said has given me any indication that if I were prosecuting [58:22.500 --> 58:25.500] this, that I could get to the Fed. [58:25.500 --> 58:26.500] Yeah. [58:26.500 --> 58:27.500] And the Fed... [58:27.500 --> 58:30.500] I don't know how we could reach the Fed with that either. [58:30.500 --> 58:31.500] Yeah. [58:31.500 --> 58:35.500] Under Rooker Feldman, they're real careful about stepping into state territory. [58:35.500 --> 58:39.500] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio. [58:39.500 --> 58:41.500] I won't give out the call-in number. [58:41.500 --> 58:46.500] I said I wouldn't last time, but I did, but I'm really not going to this time. [58:46.500 --> 58:49.500] We'll be right back. [58:49.500 --> 58:55.500] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated [58:55.500 --> 58:57.500] because they struggle to understand it. [58:57.500 --> 59:03.500] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise [59:03.500 --> 59:06.500] the profound meaning of the scripture. [59:06.500 --> 59:08.500] Enter the recovery version. [59:08.500 --> 59:14.500] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more [59:14.500 --> 59:17.500] than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:17.500 --> 59:23.500] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance [59:23.500 --> 59:27.500] into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:27.500 --> 59:32.500] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:32.500 --> 59:43.500] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [59:43.500 --> 59:47.500] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:47.500 --> 59:50.500] That's freestudybible.com. [59:50.500 --> 01:00:00.500] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:00.500 --> 01:00:06.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution that guarantee the specific [01:00:06.500 --> 01:00:08.500] freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:00:08.500 --> 01:00:10.500] Our liberty depends on it. [01:00:10.500 --> 01:00:14.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:00:14.500 --> 01:00:16.500] one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:16.500 --> 01:00:18.500] Privacy is under attack. [01:00:18.500 --> 01:00:22.500] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:00:22.500 --> 01:00:27.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:00:27.500 --> 01:00:32.500] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:00:32.500 --> 01:00:35.500] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:00:35.500 --> 01:00:40.500] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine [01:00:40.500 --> 01:00:42.500] alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:00:42.500 --> 01:00:45.500] Start over with Startpage. [01:00:45.500 --> 01:00:49.500] Most people think of seven as a more civilized number than six. [01:00:49.500 --> 01:00:54.500] Think about the number six as implicated in evil, as in the biblical 666. [01:00:54.500 --> 01:00:58.500] So it would fit right in that the Seventh Amendment would be about civil trials. [01:00:58.500 --> 01:01:00.500] Civil seven, civil trials, get it? [01:01:00.500 --> 01:01:05.500] Civil trials are ones where people sue instead of beating each other up over a dispute, [01:01:05.500 --> 01:01:07.500] like the dividing line between properties. [01:01:07.500 --> 01:01:11.500] They take their dispute to a courthouse and settle matters civilly without the fisticuffs. [01:01:11.500 --> 01:01:16.500] The Seventh Amendment guarantees that Americans have the right to a jury in certain civil matters [01:01:16.500 --> 01:01:19.500] instead of having a lone judge rule on the case. [01:01:19.500 --> 01:01:24.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:01:31.500 --> 01:01:35.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:01:35.500 --> 01:01:39.500] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:01:39.500 --> 01:01:41.500] Our liberty depends on it. [01:01:41.500 --> 01:01:44.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way [01:01:44.500 --> 01:01:47.500] to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:01:47.500 --> 01:01:49.500] Privacy is under attack. [01:01:49.500 --> 01:01:52.500] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:01:52.500 --> 01:01:57.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:01:57.500 --> 01:02:02.500] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:02:02.500 --> 01:02:05.500] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:02:05.500 --> 01:02:09.500] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:02:09.500 --> 01:02:13.500] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:02:13.500 --> 01:02:16.500] Start over with StartPage. [01:02:16.500 --> 01:02:22.500] Remember the scene in George Orwell's novel, 1984, when Winston is threatened with his worst fear? [01:02:22.500 --> 01:02:26.500] That fear was having a cage of hungry rats unleashed on his face. [01:02:26.500 --> 01:02:30.500] But what if his worst fear was spiders? Eight-legged spiders, to be exact. [01:02:30.500 --> 01:02:33.500] Getting a faceful of spiders would be pretty cruel and unusual. [01:02:33.500 --> 01:02:37.500] That image of eight-legged spiders will help you remember the Eighth Amendment. [01:02:37.500 --> 01:02:41.500] Our founding fathers added the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution [01:02:41.500 --> 01:02:44.500] to protect us from creepy-crawly eight-legged punishments [01:02:44.500 --> 01:02:48.500] and other cruel and unusual prison practices that were common in their day. [01:02:48.500 --> 01:02:52.500] The Eighth Amendment also prohibits the government from requiring excessive bail [01:02:52.500 --> 01:02:54.500] and charging excessive fines. [01:02:54.500 --> 01:03:22.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:03:24.500 --> 01:03:26.500] Thank you. [01:03:54.500 --> 01:03:59.500] Okay, we are back. Randy Cowden, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. [01:03:59.500 --> 01:04:03.500] And we're talking to Eric and Nassau Shoeshits. [01:04:03.500 --> 01:04:06.500] And Eric, this has been an interesting conversation. [01:04:06.500 --> 01:04:09.500] It's not something that we have addressed before. [01:04:09.500 --> 01:04:15.500] And it's, it's, it's, legally it's very specific. [01:04:15.500 --> 01:04:19.500] This is not a federal issue. [01:04:19.500 --> 01:04:25.500] And Brett and I talked about this. [01:04:25.500 --> 01:04:29.500] We can't find a way to get to a federal issue from here. [01:04:29.500 --> 01:04:35.500] And it's important that the patriot community sometimes gets, [01:04:35.500 --> 01:04:43.500] they don't understand the separation of powers from the Fed to the state. [01:04:43.500 --> 01:04:49.500] And they want the Feds to do things that interfere with the state. [01:04:49.500 --> 01:04:55.500] Here, I can't find anything that would get us to the Fed. [01:04:55.500 --> 01:04:59.500] Because this is about property within a state. [01:04:59.500 --> 01:05:05.500] And one thing I keep saying over and over and I hope people get. [01:05:05.500 --> 01:05:15.500] In the United States, we tend to think of a state as a political subdivision of the United States. [01:05:15.500 --> 01:05:18.500] Some countries are like that. [01:05:18.500 --> 01:05:22.500] It is no such thing. [01:05:22.500 --> 01:05:30.500] A state in the United States has the same meaning state means all over the world. [01:05:30.500 --> 01:05:37.500] And all over the world, state means sovereign nation. [01:05:37.500 --> 01:05:54.500] New Jersey is a sovereign nation that has entered into an agreement with a federal entity that was created by contract. [01:05:54.500 --> 01:06:11.500] Where all of these 50 states have agreed to allow the federal government to have authority over certain very specific and limited issues. [01:06:11.500 --> 01:06:21.500] When it comes to issues of the state within the state is none of America's business. [01:06:21.500 --> 01:06:36.500] The ruling I mentioned earlier about the state of Texas condemning property so they could rezone it commercial so they could make more money in tax. [01:06:36.500 --> 01:06:42.500] The federal government, these people appealed it all the way up to the Feds. [01:06:42.500 --> 01:06:46.500] And the Feds came back and said, not our business. [01:06:46.500 --> 01:06:53.500] State law says they can do this, don't ask us to interfere with state law. [01:06:53.500 --> 01:06:57.500] Eric, I can't find anything to get us to the Fed. [01:06:57.500 --> 01:07:01.500] And I'm not even sure we can get to the state. [01:07:01.500 --> 01:07:04.500] How does a zoning... [01:07:04.500 --> 01:07:08.500] Okay, let's talk about state and zoning. [01:07:08.500 --> 01:07:17.500] Who passes... Eric, are these state zoning laws or are they municipal zoning laws? [01:07:17.500 --> 01:07:23.500] Well, again, Boston is unique and they have unique zoning laws, unlike... [01:07:23.500 --> 01:07:26.500] Okay, hold on, hold on. [01:07:26.500 --> 01:07:35.500] Let's talk about zoning laws and to whom they apply. [01:07:35.500 --> 01:07:42.500] You are a citizen in a republic, New Jersey is a republic. [01:07:42.500 --> 01:08:01.500] And does the New Jersey Constitution allow municipalities to write law? [01:08:01.500 --> 01:08:06.500] And the reason I ask the question that way is in the Ohio Constitution, [01:08:06.500 --> 01:08:12.500] it does specifically authorize municipalities to write law. [01:08:12.500 --> 01:08:17.500] Is that the case in Massachusetts? [01:08:17.500 --> 01:08:20.500] They're definitely able to write statutes. [01:08:20.500 --> 01:08:21.500] I don't know... [01:08:21.500 --> 01:08:22.500] No, no, no, hold on, hold on, hold on. [01:08:22.500 --> 01:08:28.500] Are you being held to city statutes or city ordinances? [01:08:28.500 --> 01:08:31.500] What's the difference between an ordinance and a statute? [01:08:31.500 --> 01:08:34.500] Oh, very big difference. [01:08:34.500 --> 01:08:41.500] We're in Texas and the Texas Constitution allows the legislature to write law. [01:08:41.500 --> 01:08:51.500] And the legislature passed these laws in the government code that said that municipalities could pass ordinances. [01:08:51.500 --> 01:08:57.500] They don't call them ordinances by mistake. [01:08:57.500 --> 01:09:08.500] They call them ordinances because nothing in the Texas Constitution authorizes a municipality to write law. [01:09:08.500 --> 01:09:29.500] So the municipality can pass ordinances, but those ordinances can only apply to... [01:09:29.500 --> 01:09:31.500] Hey, you broke up. [01:09:31.500 --> 01:09:33.500] Okay, say that again. [01:09:33.500 --> 01:09:39.500] He was saying that they only apply... [01:09:39.500 --> 01:09:42.500] So he was saying that the ordinances are not laws. [01:09:42.500 --> 01:09:49.500] They can only apply to the municipality and to anybody who's connected to the municipality with like a... [01:09:49.500 --> 01:09:52.500] They're in contract, contractual privity. [01:09:52.500 --> 01:10:00.500] They have some kind of connection, some nexus that puts them into the position of being regulated by that ordinance. [01:10:00.500 --> 01:10:04.500] Yes, where they have agreed to the statutory scheme. [01:10:04.500 --> 01:10:17.500] If they attempt to exert the authority of the ordinance on a private citizen, then it becomes a law. [01:10:17.500 --> 01:10:23.500] And nothing in Texas Constitution authorizes a municipality to enforce a law. [01:10:23.500 --> 01:10:33.500] While they can create the ordinance, they cannot enforce it against a citizen. [01:10:33.500 --> 01:10:39.500] Only the legislature can pass laws that apply to citizens. [01:10:39.500 --> 01:10:47.500] Remember all this stuff about masks and vaccinations and executive orders? [01:10:47.500 --> 01:10:56.500] Those executive orders could only apply to those individuals who fell within the statutory scheme, [01:10:56.500 --> 01:11:02.500] who were employees of the executive branch. [01:11:02.500 --> 01:11:16.500] When the governors tried to extend that authority to the citizen, that was an overreach and a breach of Constitution. [01:11:16.500 --> 01:11:29.500] Look at Massachusetts law and see if municipalities are authorized to enforce, to create law. [01:11:29.500 --> 01:11:42.500] See if the legislature has been granted the authority to delegate its lawmaking authority to municipal corporations. [01:11:42.500 --> 01:12:01.500] It says bylaws that all bylaws made by such municipal or city government shall be subject at all times to be annulled by the general court. [01:12:01.500 --> 01:12:04.500] Wait a minute, who said that? [01:12:04.500 --> 01:12:09.500] This is in the Constitution, Mass Constitution. [01:12:09.500 --> 01:12:14.500] Okay, then perhaps we don't have that argument. [01:12:14.500 --> 01:12:17.500] So the Constitution, say that again. [01:12:17.500 --> 01:12:20.500] What does it say? [01:12:20.500 --> 01:12:39.500] It says, this is like Article 2, so it's an early one, that all bylaws made by such municipal or city government shall be subject at all times to be annulled by the general court. [01:12:39.500 --> 01:12:48.500] Okay, that does not authorize them to, that doesn't say anything about it applying to the private citizen. [01:12:48.500 --> 01:12:51.500] Right, it just says we can strike you down if we need to. [01:12:51.500 --> 01:13:03.500] Who does the Constitution delegate lawmaking authority to? [01:13:03.500 --> 01:13:06.500] Okay, I'll explain why I ask you it that way. [01:13:06.500 --> 01:13:18.500] In Texas, the lawmaking authority is vested in the legislature and nobody else. [01:13:18.500 --> 01:13:25.500] Part of this you have to look at how these pieces are put together, it's not explicit. [01:13:25.500 --> 01:13:32.500] The Constitution authorizes, authorizes the legislature to pass laws. [01:13:32.500 --> 01:13:48.500] Nowhere in the Constitution did it authorize the legislature to delegate its authority to some other entity, i.e. municipal corporation. [01:13:48.500 --> 01:13:57.500] In the government code, the legislature purported to delegate its lawmaking authority to municipal corporations. [01:13:57.500 --> 01:14:06.500] We challenged that with a writ of mandamus and the Court of Appeals accepted our writ of mandamus. [01:14:06.500 --> 01:14:15.500] In Texas, 12% of writs of mandamus get accepted by the court, 2% get ruled in favor of the filer. [01:14:15.500 --> 01:14:29.500] We filed one pro se, they accepted it and they took six months and then dismissed the case for a different reason than the one we claimed. [01:14:29.500 --> 01:14:33.500] We claimed that the city ordinance could not apply to the private individual. [01:14:33.500 --> 01:14:52.500] They went into the codes and found where in order to have the hearing that they held, they had to hold a meeting and all of the council had to agree that the council would hold these kinds of meetings and they didn't do that, so we dismissed everything. [01:14:52.500 --> 01:14:59.500] I read that and said, what in the heck is going on here? I didn't bring that issue. [01:14:59.500 --> 01:15:04.500] The court itself went out and found that issue. [01:15:04.500 --> 01:15:13.500] They went and found that issue because they did not want our argument saying that only the legislature can write law. [01:15:13.500 --> 01:15:32.500] If a municipality issues a ordinance, it can only apply to certain individuals in contractual privity with the municipality. If they applied it to the individual, then it has the effect of law and they can't write law. Does that make sense? [01:15:32.500 --> 01:15:38.500] It does, but again, going back to I think I have a contract. [01:15:38.500 --> 01:15:42.500] How do you have a contract with your municipality? [01:15:42.500 --> 01:15:52.500] Because when I bought my property, the zoning laws, the zoning rules guidelines were in place and that was a dual signed agreement. [01:15:52.500 --> 01:15:55.500] So what? [01:15:55.500 --> 01:15:59.500] When I bought my property, the zoning laws were in place. [01:15:59.500 --> 01:16:05.500] I've told the city that the zoning laws don't apply to me. [01:16:05.500 --> 01:16:09.500] I'm a private citizen. I'm not a member of your corporation. [01:16:09.500 --> 01:16:12.500] How do you apply them to me? [01:16:12.500 --> 01:16:16.500] If you apply those to me, they're laws. [01:16:16.500 --> 01:16:20.500] But you can't write law. [01:16:20.500 --> 01:16:24.500] That was the issue. You can't apply it to the general public. [01:16:24.500 --> 01:16:30.500] You can only apply it to the municipality, the corporation. [01:16:30.500 --> 01:16:36.500] Which is fine because I want to hold them to their agreement. [01:16:36.500 --> 01:16:43.500] Hang on. We'll pick this up on the other side. [01:16:43.500 --> 01:16:50.500] I know I'm taking a lot of time on this, but I really like these complex issues like this. [01:16:50.500 --> 01:17:00.500] This is how we come to understand how law really works. We'll be right back. [01:17:00.500 --> 01:17:06.500] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word? [01:17:06.500 --> 01:17:12.500] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk [01:17:12.500 --> 01:17:17.500] where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [01:17:17.500 --> 01:17:24.500] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth. [01:17:24.500 --> 01:17:31.500] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [01:17:31.500 --> 01:17:38.500] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development. [01:17:38.500 --> 01:17:43.500] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [01:17:43.500 --> 01:17:49.500] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [01:17:49.500 --> 01:17:59.500] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [01:17:59.500 --> 01:18:06.500] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [01:18:06.500 --> 01:18:11.500] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [01:18:11.500 --> 01:18:17.500] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:18:17.500 --> 01:18:25.500] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:18:25.500 --> 01:18:31.500] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [01:18:31.500 --> 01:18:40.500] We have come to trust young Jevity so much we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:18:40.500 --> 01:18:48.500] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [01:18:48.500 --> 01:18:52.500] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:18:52.500 --> 01:18:59.500] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [01:18:59.500 --> 01:19:01.500] Order now. [01:19:01.500 --> 01:19:11.500] This is the LogosLofogos Radio Network. [01:19:11.500 --> 01:19:32.500] Okay, we are back. [01:19:32.500 --> 01:19:35.500] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Love Radio. [01:19:35.500 --> 01:19:41.500] And Eric, I just told Brett that you are making my brain hurt. [01:19:41.500 --> 01:19:55.500] This is great because we have to exercise strict mental discipline when we are talking about issues that are this complex. [01:19:55.500 --> 01:20:00.500] And for me, this is the greatest fun I get to have. [01:20:00.500 --> 01:20:05.500] So go back to your Constitution. [01:20:05.500 --> 01:20:09.500] What does the Constitution allow? [01:20:09.500 --> 01:20:19.500] To whom does the Massachusetts Constitution allow to write law? [01:20:19.500 --> 01:20:31.500] I am saying this because we looked at Ohio law, and it specifically authorized municipalities to write law relative to the municipality. [01:20:31.500 --> 01:20:40.500] Is there anything in the Massachusetts Constitution that states or even contemplates such a thing? [01:20:40.500 --> 01:20:54.500] I quickly glance at it, and I can't give you that answer, but what I can tell you is Massachusetts being so old, it really follows the federal oftentimes. [01:20:54.500 --> 01:21:12.500] And I am going to suggest that the likelihood that Massachusetts is one of the original colonies, the likelihood that they allowed anyone other than the legislature to write law is very unlikely. [01:21:12.500 --> 01:21:17.500] This is something that happened later on. [01:21:17.500 --> 01:21:40.500] I am going to bet, even if they, unless there is something very explicit, if you bring up the issue of the applicability of a municipal ordinance to a private citizen, that is not something that they are going to want to get in front of the Supreme. [01:21:40.500 --> 01:21:44.500] Yeah, they don't want to touch that. That would cause too much mess. [01:21:44.500 --> 01:21:56.500] That is what happened in Texas. The Court of Appeals looked at this and said, holy mackerel, we do not want this to get before the Supreme. [01:21:56.500 --> 01:22:00.500] So how do we keep it from getting before the Supreme? [01:22:00.500 --> 01:22:15.500] Just for clarification, if they would deny this, if they would give a bad ruling, then that means that their bad ruling could get appealed. That is what he is saying about not wanting it to get there. [01:22:15.500 --> 01:22:33.500] And this was in the Appellate Court, but it was on a mandamus. So they did not want us to appeal it to them, because if we did and they gave us a ruling we did not like, we could appeal it to the Supreme. [01:22:33.500 --> 01:22:47.500] And they were afraid that the Supreme would give a bad ruling. If the Supreme gave us the ruling we wanted, all of the city ordinances and county ordinances in the state would be trash. [01:22:47.500 --> 01:22:56.500] That is always the kind of issue you want to bring. You want to bring an issue they do not want to respond to. They do not want to risk. [01:22:56.500 --> 01:23:18.500] And unless something very specific gives municipalities the authority to write law as opposed to ordinance, you could very well back them up quickly and get the higher courts. [01:23:18.500 --> 01:23:29.500] It goes to the difference between the trial court and the appellate court. The trial court looks at the facts and the issue. The appellate court does not care about that. [01:23:29.500 --> 01:23:43.500] The appellate court cares about the sanctity of the corpus juris, the body of law, because what the appellate court rules, everybody can use. [01:23:43.500 --> 01:24:00.500] And that is what Texas Court of Appeals was afraid of. If this guy gets this issue to the Supreme and the Supreme agrees with him, it would create chaos across Texas. [01:24:00.500 --> 01:24:19.500] So how do we keep this guy from getting to the Supreme? We throw it out on something that is not very controversial. And if the other side appeals, we will kick their behinds. [01:24:19.500 --> 01:24:39.500] Does it make sense where I am going, Eric? It does, but I keep falling back to that this is a contract. Okay, who are parties to that contract? The mayor and the residents. [01:24:39.500 --> 01:24:53.500] How are you a party to the contract? Because I had a representative committee make an agreement with the mayor. We, the committee, allow our neighborhood to be zoned in this manner. [01:24:53.500 --> 01:25:07.500] Here's our signature. Okay, thank you. Here's my signature. Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Can you do that? That's one of my questions too. Can you do that? I don't know. [01:25:07.500 --> 01:25:12.500] You can do it for yourself. You can't apply that to somebody else. [01:25:12.500 --> 01:25:37.500] Yeah, so you and a bunch of other people, you get in this room and you all, you guys all agree that, yeah, we're going to give up these rights to the city in order to have a certain amount of consistency. We don't want someone coming in here and posting naked women all over their building. [01:25:37.500 --> 01:25:48.500] So we'll give up our right to do that. Can you give up a right for someone other than yourself in your committee? [01:25:48.500 --> 01:25:59.500] And that's obviously something that I consider. But again, I'm trying to hold them to their agreement rather than having them hold me to my agreement. [01:25:59.500 --> 01:26:12.500] Do you understand that? I'm spinning it around because we as patriots, we're trying to get freedom. In this case, I'm trying to box them in. I'm trying to put them in jail and say, hey, you made this agreement. You need to uphold it. [01:26:12.500 --> 01:26:20.500] You can't be giving out variances for nuclear power plants next to my house because it's in the zoning law. [01:26:20.500 --> 01:26:30.500] Oh, okay. So you're claiming that they're interfering with your property rights. [01:26:30.500 --> 01:26:34.500] Absolutely. [01:26:34.500 --> 01:26:43.500] They made an agreement with me or they made an agreement with the community. So a lot of times going back to my sprint agreement, let's say, right. So that's a service agreement. [01:26:43.500 --> 01:26:56.500] So you sign the service agreement, but ultimately, they're the ones providing the service. They have the obligation. You don't because it's a one sided agreement. [01:26:56.500 --> 01:27:02.500] So they have to uphold their end of the agreement, right? I mean, correct me where I might be wrong. [01:27:02.500 --> 01:27:23.500] On the condition that you pay them, when you pay the contract is not a contract until something of value have changed hands. So if you pay the company, then they have this obligation. If you pay your taxes, then the city has an obligation. [01:27:23.500 --> 01:27:27.500] Right. [01:27:27.500 --> 01:27:34.500] So again, I'm trying to box them in. I'm trying to hold them accountable for an agreement that they made with me. [01:27:34.500 --> 01:27:45.500] They are like sprint and they get a new president and he says, I'm not letting Eric pay $100 a month for unlimited. He's going to pay $200. I don't care that he's got an agreement. [01:27:45.500 --> 01:27:52.500] That's different. That's somebody changing terms of an agreement that was with the person that actually did the agreeing. [01:27:52.500 --> 01:28:00.500] What you're talking about for the zoning is you're trying to hold the zoning people accountable to push their zoning rules on somebody else that it doesn't apply to. [01:28:00.500 --> 01:28:10.500] So it sounds like to me, I can see how they can have the set up their zoning things in accordance with the agreement. [01:28:10.500 --> 01:28:17.500] But they can they enforce that against somebody who didn't agree to it? I don't see that. [01:28:17.500 --> 01:28:22.500] Well, but what I'm saying is they're not enforcing it. They're not enforcing what they agreed to. [01:28:22.500 --> 01:28:29.500] So they spent five years creating these zoning laws and they get a new mayor and the mayor is like, I don't care about those zoning laws. [01:28:29.500 --> 01:28:38.500] We're going to start building nuclear power plants and 16 story buildings and we're going to increase the population by 40 percent in Eric's neighborhood because I don't care. [01:28:38.500 --> 01:28:45.500] Oh, OK. We've been looking at this wrong all the time. You're embracing these. [01:28:45.500 --> 01:28:48.500] I'm embracing to hold them accountable. [01:28:48.500 --> 01:28:53.500] Then that would be great for a lawsuit against the mayor. [01:28:53.500 --> 01:29:03.500] OK, now I'm also seeing a different angle. When you gave that example, it sounds like you're not trying to enforce it against somebody it doesn't apply to, but you're trying to enforce it against them. [01:29:03.500 --> 01:29:08.500] The zoning people themselves are not holding themselves to their own agreement. Is that what I'm understanding now? [01:29:08.500 --> 01:29:14.500] Exactly. And the courts are not upholding the agreement. [01:29:14.500 --> 01:29:17.500] So I put in front of the court, hey, this is a two party agreement. [01:29:17.500 --> 01:29:21.500] And they're like, we can't see that. You don't have standing. Go away. [01:29:21.500 --> 01:29:24.500] OK, this needs to be appealed. [01:29:24.500 --> 01:29:31.500] The real work of the courts occurs in the appellate courts, not in the trial court. [01:29:31.500 --> 01:29:35.500] Hang on. We're about to run out of time in this segment. [01:29:35.500 --> 01:29:40.500] This is great. And we spent too much time on it. We've got more callers. [01:29:40.500 --> 01:29:43.500] Can you call back tomorrow night? [01:29:43.500 --> 01:29:45.500] We've got four hours. [01:29:45.500 --> 01:29:51.500] I would love to. I can give you lots of information and documents that you can look at. I've already given Alex some. [01:29:51.500 --> 01:30:00.500] Email me some, Randy at ruleoflawradio.com. Hang on. We'll move ahead when we come back. We'll be right back. [01:30:00.500 --> 01:30:09.500] Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing. [01:30:09.500 --> 01:30:13.500] But now researchers say we can add stress to the list. [01:30:13.500 --> 01:30:16.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. Back with details in a moment. [01:30:16.500 --> 01:30:22.500] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:22.500 --> 01:30:27.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:27.500 --> 01:30:32.500] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:32.500 --> 01:30:35.500] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:35.500 --> 01:30:42.500] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:42.500 --> 01:30:46.500] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:46.500 --> 01:30:49.500] Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects? [01:30:49.500 --> 01:30:52.500] If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart. [01:30:52.500 --> 01:30:56.500] But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain. [01:30:56.500 --> 01:31:04.500] A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons, which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems. [01:31:04.500 --> 01:31:10.500] Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex. [01:31:10.500 --> 01:31:15.500] That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions. [01:31:15.500 --> 01:31:21.500] So take a deep breath and chill out. It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack. [01:31:21.500 --> 01:31:31.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:31.500 --> 01:31:36.500] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:36.500 --> 01:31:38.500] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:38.500 --> 01:31:43.500] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.500 --> 01:31:46.500] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.500 --> 01:31:49.500] And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:31:49.500 --> 01:31:50.500] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.500 --> 01:31:51.500] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:51.500 --> 01:31:53.500] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:53.500 --> 01:31:54.500] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.500 --> 01:31:55.500] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.500 --> 01:31:58.500] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.500 --> 01:32:01.500] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:58.500 --> 01:33:02.500] We all want and deserve. [01:33:02.500 --> 01:33:13.500] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:13.500 --> 01:33:41.500] Yeah, who you want to chip? [01:33:41.500 --> 01:33:45.500] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Bret Fountain Wheel of Law Radio. [01:33:45.500 --> 01:33:53.500] I know we spent a lot of time on this, but this is, for me, the most fun thing I get to do. [01:33:53.500 --> 01:34:01.500] Eddie Craig and I, he contacts me when he has a really complex, difficult issue. [01:34:01.500 --> 01:34:05.500] And we do exactly what we're doing here. [01:34:05.500 --> 01:34:10.500] We both take opposing issues. [01:34:10.500 --> 01:34:14.500] He proposes something, I rip it to shreds. [01:34:14.500 --> 01:34:18.500] I propose something, he rips it to shreds. [01:34:18.500 --> 01:34:21.500] Much better we do this here than we do this in the court. [01:34:21.500 --> 01:34:28.500] So this is the kind of technical examination that I like the most. [01:34:28.500 --> 01:34:32.500] It is an exercise in mental discipline. [01:34:32.500 --> 01:34:36.500] And Eric, will you call us back tomorrow night? [01:34:36.500 --> 01:34:39.500] I have a four-hour show tomorrow night. [01:34:39.500 --> 01:34:42.500] What time is it? [01:34:42.500 --> 01:34:43.500] Go ahead. [01:34:43.500 --> 01:34:45.500] What time do you want me to call? [01:34:45.500 --> 01:34:47.500] Call in early. [01:34:47.500 --> 01:34:49.500] We'll take you early in the show. [01:34:49.500 --> 01:34:51.500] Okay. [01:34:51.500 --> 01:34:56.500] Okay, I may have a guest, and if I have a guest, I'll take you right after the guest. [01:34:56.500 --> 01:34:57.500] That's fine. [01:34:57.500 --> 01:34:59.500] And I'll provide you some more information. [01:34:59.500 --> 01:35:01.500] Good. [01:35:01.500 --> 01:35:03.500] Okay, thank you, Eric. [01:35:03.500 --> 01:35:09.500] Okay, now we're going to go to AJ in Arizona. [01:35:09.500 --> 01:35:11.500] Brett, did we lose our first-time caller? [01:35:11.500 --> 01:35:13.500] Or is it AJ? [01:35:13.500 --> 01:35:14.500] It's AJ. [01:35:14.500 --> 01:35:15.500] Okay. [01:35:15.500 --> 01:35:16.500] Hello? [01:35:16.500 --> 01:35:18.500] AJ, you're a first-time caller? [01:35:18.500 --> 01:35:19.500] Can you hear me? [01:35:19.500 --> 01:35:20.500] I am a first-time caller. [01:35:20.500 --> 01:35:22.500] Yes, I can. [01:35:22.500 --> 01:35:26.500] What do you have for us today? [01:35:26.500 --> 01:35:30.500] Well, good evening, Brett and Randy. [01:35:30.500 --> 01:35:37.500] So I stopped having a license plate on my vehicle about a year ago on my car as I was [01:35:37.500 --> 01:35:41.500] going about in my personal business, and it worked really well for me until it didn't [01:35:41.500 --> 01:35:42.500] anymore. [01:35:42.500 --> 01:35:50.500] I had a few interactions with police, and about a month and a half ago, I had one where [01:35:50.500 --> 01:35:54.500] I ended up receiving a few citations from it. [01:35:54.500 --> 01:36:04.500] And initial hearing, I challenged jurisdiction repeatedly, and the judge did not – she [01:36:04.500 --> 01:36:09.500] didn't like that and just told me I have jurisdiction because I have jurisdiction, [01:36:09.500 --> 01:36:12.500] and scheduled it for a hearing. [01:36:12.500 --> 01:36:17.500] I filed multiple motions to dismiss for – [01:36:17.500 --> 01:36:18.500] Wait, wait. [01:36:18.500 --> 01:36:19.500] Hold on. [01:36:19.500 --> 01:36:22.500] You said hate pronouns. [01:36:22.500 --> 01:36:24.500] Scheduled it for a hearing. [01:36:24.500 --> 01:36:27.500] What did it refer to? [01:36:27.500 --> 01:36:34.500] Civil traffic complaint to schedule a hearing. [01:36:34.500 --> 01:36:35.500] Okay. [01:36:35.500 --> 01:36:40.500] Did he not schedule the subject matter jurisdiction challenge for a hearing? [01:36:40.500 --> 01:36:42.500] No. [01:36:42.500 --> 01:36:45.500] Did he dismiss it out of hand? [01:36:45.500 --> 01:36:48.500] That challenge was dismissed out of hand, yes. [01:36:48.500 --> 01:36:49.500] The judge is a woman. [01:36:49.500 --> 01:36:51.500] It doesn't really matter, but – [01:36:51.500 --> 01:36:52.500] Okay, wait. [01:36:52.500 --> 01:36:58.500] There are things a judge can do with a subject matter jurisdiction challenge, but dismiss [01:36:58.500 --> 01:37:02.500] it as not one of them. [01:37:02.500 --> 01:37:09.500] I would suggest that you file against – that before you allow the judge to get past subject [01:37:09.500 --> 01:37:19.500] matter jurisdiction, is that you file a petition for a writ of mandamus. [01:37:19.500 --> 01:37:31.500] With the appellate court, if Arizona is like most states, a class C misdemeanor is appealed [01:37:31.500 --> 01:37:33.500] to a county court. [01:37:33.500 --> 01:37:41.500] So you petition the county court for writ of mandamus, ordering the trial judge to hold [01:37:41.500 --> 01:37:49.500] a hearing on the challenge to subject matter jurisdiction and prove up jurisdiction. [01:37:49.500 --> 01:37:52.500] Jurisdiction is a threshold issue. [01:37:52.500 --> 01:37:57.500] The judge cannot step across the threshold of the courtroom. [01:37:57.500 --> 01:38:01.500] Even if he wants to presume to. [01:38:01.500 --> 01:38:05.500] Until he has proved up jurisdiction. [01:38:05.500 --> 01:38:12.500] I did not find out that jurisdiction – that it wasn't scheduled for hearing as my request [01:38:12.500 --> 01:38:17.500] and that she had just dismissed it and gave a one-page summary on why she dismissed my [01:38:17.500 --> 01:38:19.500] various motions. [01:38:19.500 --> 01:38:24.500] But the hearing was this morning and I learned that the court does not operate under the [01:38:24.500 --> 01:38:27.500] rules of civil procedure or criminal procedure. [01:38:27.500 --> 01:38:33.500] Arizona has rules of court procedure for civil traffic, voting, marijuana, and parking and [01:38:33.500 --> 01:38:35.500] standing violations. [01:38:35.500 --> 01:38:38.500] It's a different set of rules that they operate under. [01:38:38.500 --> 01:38:40.500] Interesting. [01:38:40.500 --> 01:38:46.500] What do those rules say about jurisdiction? [01:38:46.500 --> 01:38:51.500] They don't specifically address jurisdiction. [01:38:51.500 --> 01:39:00.500] They go back to state rules and go back to state case law on jurisdiction. [01:39:00.500 --> 01:39:07.500] Whatever rules they have for traffic, they can't get to those rules until they get past [01:39:07.500 --> 01:39:11.500] the threshold of the courtroom. [01:39:11.500 --> 01:39:13.500] What were those again, AJ? [01:39:13.500 --> 01:39:17.500] You said parking and what were the voting? [01:39:17.500 --> 01:39:22.500] Voting, marijuana, parking and standing violations. [01:39:22.500 --> 01:39:29.500] As I went through those rules, it appeared this court has just kind of evolved over time [01:39:29.500 --> 01:39:36.500] and it started as an administrative court to handle things in specific areas, but now [01:39:36.500 --> 01:39:41.500] it's combined together and essentially the rules that oversee this court are meant to [01:39:41.500 --> 01:39:46.500] be only civil infractions and they fully take away due process. [01:39:46.500 --> 01:39:49.500] It does not allow appeal past the appellate level. [01:39:49.500 --> 01:39:52.500] You can't appeal a decision to the Supreme Court. [01:39:52.500 --> 01:39:55.500] You can't raise certain issues. [01:39:55.500 --> 01:40:00.500] The rules of evidence are out the window, so hearsay is admitted. [01:40:00.500 --> 01:40:03.500] There's all kinds of stuff in there that just make it so they... [01:40:03.500 --> 01:40:07.500] It sounds like it's ripe for a constitutional challenge. [01:40:07.500 --> 01:40:12.500] That's what I was thinking and as I looked at stuff, it looked like the last time the [01:40:12.500 --> 01:40:19.500] references that I found in looking things up on Google or Scholar or whatever, most [01:40:19.500 --> 01:40:27.500] of the references stopped with challenges from the 70s and 80s and it didn't really [01:40:27.500 --> 01:40:28.500] address... [01:40:28.500 --> 01:40:33.500] There were some jurisdictional challenges to the court, but essentially they just say, [01:40:33.500 --> 01:40:38.500] well, we can't actually address this because you don't have... [01:40:38.500 --> 01:40:42.500] There's only one level of challenge that can happen and after that, they won't even [01:40:42.500 --> 01:40:43.500] address it. [01:40:43.500 --> 01:40:48.500] It cannot go past the appellate level because it's not in the code. [01:40:48.500 --> 01:40:53.500] It's just like a way to keep everything trapped, it seems. [01:40:53.500 --> 01:40:57.500] This sounds ripe for a constitutional challenge. [01:40:57.500 --> 01:40:58.500] Yeah. [01:40:58.500 --> 01:41:03.500] The judge is prosecuting the court as well. [01:41:03.500 --> 01:41:04.500] Okay. [01:41:04.500 --> 01:41:10.500] Well, I really don't know how to address this because you're saying that there are laws [01:41:10.500 --> 01:41:22.500] or rules that are specific to this issue that takes it outside of the normal due process. [01:41:22.500 --> 01:41:24.500] Yeah. [01:41:24.500 --> 01:41:27.500] How does that work? [01:41:27.500 --> 01:41:28.500] Right. [01:41:28.500 --> 01:41:39.500] It reminded me of the case that you mentioned, Randy, where the appeal actually started out [01:41:39.500 --> 01:41:45.500] saying that the appellate court doesn't even have jurisdiction because if the original [01:41:45.500 --> 01:41:50.500] court didn't have jurisdiction and they ruled incorrectly, then the appeal court can't have [01:41:50.500 --> 01:41:53.500] jurisdiction over the incorrect thing either. [01:41:53.500 --> 01:41:54.500] Right. [01:41:54.500 --> 01:42:02.500] For those of you who don't get that, if your trial court didn't have jurisdiction, you [01:42:02.500 --> 01:42:11.500] appeal to the appellate court and say, you don't have jurisdiction because the original [01:42:11.500 --> 01:42:15.500] trial court did not have jurisdiction. [01:42:15.500 --> 01:42:21.500] The only thing the appellate court can do is either determine that the trial court had [01:42:21.500 --> 01:42:26.500] jurisdiction, or they can dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. [01:42:26.500 --> 01:42:32.500] That's what happened in our municipal case where we challenged the city ordinance. [01:42:32.500 --> 01:42:34.500] Yeah. [01:42:34.500 --> 01:42:38.500] Oh, I did have... [01:42:38.500 --> 01:42:44.500] There was an interesting thing that I realized after the hearing as well. [01:42:44.500 --> 01:42:51.500] Neither the officer who was testifying nor myself, we weren't put under oath in the hearing. [01:42:51.500 --> 01:42:56.500] In the hearing before me, both parties were put under oath before they testified to anything. [01:42:56.500 --> 01:43:02.500] Would that by itself be grounds for something, or is that going to depend on the rules of [01:43:02.500 --> 01:43:04.500] the procedure for civil traffic? [01:43:04.500 --> 01:43:12.500] It's likely to depend on the rules, but if you lie in the courtroom, whether you were [01:43:12.500 --> 01:43:18.500] actually put under oath or not, you're going to be presumed to be under oath. [01:43:18.500 --> 01:43:20.500] That's interesting that they didn't do it. [01:43:20.500 --> 01:43:25.500] Was the other one a similar kind of case, or was it a different nature? [01:43:25.500 --> 01:43:31.500] No, it was a civil traffic case, but it was an old man who was happy to just go along [01:43:31.500 --> 01:43:36.500] with everything instead of a belligerent litigant who was objecting to everything and [01:43:36.500 --> 01:43:38.500] challenging it the entire time. [01:43:38.500 --> 01:43:43.500] I think I flustered the judge. [01:43:43.500 --> 01:43:47.500] Well, congratulations. [01:43:47.500 --> 01:43:50.500] Okay, hang on. [01:43:50.500 --> 01:43:55.500] We're going to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Willow Radio. [01:43:55.500 --> 01:44:20.500] We'll be right back. [01:44:25.500 --> 01:44:50.500] We'll be right back. [01:44:50.500 --> 01:44:56.500] We'll be right back. [01:45:20.500 --> 01:45:23.500] We'll be right back. [01:45:50.500 --> 01:45:55.500] Hello? [01:45:55.500 --> 01:45:58.500] Oh, man. [01:45:58.500 --> 01:46:00.500] You're in jail. [01:46:00.500 --> 01:46:02.500] You got a broken leg? [01:46:02.500 --> 01:46:04.500] Oh, man. [01:46:04.500 --> 01:46:11.500] I'm broke, man. [01:46:11.500 --> 01:46:13.500] Can't jail [01:46:13.500 --> 01:46:15.500] You got broken legs? [01:46:15.500 --> 01:46:17.500] Aw man, I'm broke, dude [01:46:23.500 --> 01:46:27.500] Some things in this world I will never understand [01:46:27.500 --> 01:46:31.500] Some things I realize fully [01:46:31.500 --> 01:46:35.500] Somebody's gonna police a policeman [01:46:35.500 --> 01:46:39.500] Somebody's gonna police a bully [01:46:39.500 --> 01:46:41.500] There's always a room... [01:47:09.500 --> 01:47:15.500] Have you directly challenged subject matter jurisdiction? [01:47:15.500 --> 01:47:20.500] Only in my motion challenging subject matter jurisdiction [01:47:20.500 --> 01:47:25.500] That was ruled on and I just found out about the ruling today [01:47:25.500 --> 01:47:28.500] But it was not heard and she didn't... [01:47:28.500 --> 01:47:33.500] She provided a brief description but didn't reference anything [01:47:33.500 --> 01:47:38.500] She just said we're operating under the civil court rules [01:47:38.500 --> 01:47:40.500] And I have jurisdiction [01:47:40.500 --> 01:47:44.500] She didn't prove up anything, gave no factual basis [01:47:44.500 --> 01:47:48.500] What do you want to do? [01:47:48.500 --> 01:47:51.500] I want to... [01:47:51.500 --> 01:47:55.500] Well, I want to get rid of the initial stuff for myself [01:47:55.500 --> 01:47:58.500] But I want to... [01:47:58.500 --> 01:48:00.500] I wouldn't mind changing the whole process [01:48:00.500 --> 01:48:04.500] So they stop going after people who are just minding their own business [01:48:04.500 --> 01:48:08.500] And going about their personal stuff and get taken at their liberty [01:48:08.500 --> 01:48:11.500] By armed men who I found out today [01:48:11.500 --> 01:48:14.500] The cop approached my vehicle with his gun out [01:48:14.500 --> 01:48:17.500] Because he was terrified or something [01:48:17.500 --> 01:48:21.500] So I'm gonna be going after a lot of folks I guess [01:48:21.500 --> 01:48:26.500] Have you filed aggravated assault charges against the officer? [01:48:26.500 --> 01:48:28.500] No, not yet [01:48:28.500 --> 01:48:32.500] Although I have started putting together my factual basis for that [01:48:32.500 --> 01:48:36.500] Okay, I am a combat veteran [01:48:36.500 --> 01:48:42.500] And I've had guns pointed at me in anger [01:48:42.500 --> 01:48:49.500] But I've had more guns pointed at me by police in the United States [01:48:49.500 --> 01:48:54.500] Than I have pointed at me in combat [01:48:54.500 --> 01:48:59.500] And I take that very serious [01:48:59.500 --> 01:49:04.500] I advocate gun rights, but I don't own one [01:49:04.500 --> 01:49:09.500] The reason I don't own one is I've spent too much time on the sharp end of those things [01:49:09.500 --> 01:49:14.500] And I have very intimate knowledge and recollection [01:49:14.500 --> 01:49:19.500] Of the horrible damage that they do to human beings [01:49:19.500 --> 01:49:23.500] When someone talks to me and they're armed [01:49:23.500 --> 01:49:26.500] If their hand gets very close to that pistol [01:49:26.500 --> 01:49:31.500] I take that incredibly seriously [01:49:31.500 --> 01:49:34.500] I consider my life at grave risk [01:49:34.500 --> 01:49:39.500] If a policeman approaches me with his gun in his hand [01:49:39.500 --> 01:49:42.500] That's aggravated assault [01:49:42.500 --> 01:49:46.500] He better come up with a really good reason [01:49:46.500 --> 01:49:49.500] For having that gun in his hand [01:49:49.500 --> 01:49:53.500] Or we're gonna have ourselves a fight [01:49:53.500 --> 01:49:59.500] Have you taken on that issue? Have you filed criminal charges against the officer? [01:49:59.500 --> 01:50:01.500] No, not yet [01:50:01.500 --> 01:50:03.500] He said he's just about to [01:50:03.500 --> 01:50:07.500] Have you filed a professional conduct complaint against the officer [01:50:07.500 --> 01:50:12.500] Claiming that he was improperly trained? [01:50:12.500 --> 01:50:17.500] No, I did not know that was one of the aspects, but that makes sense [01:50:17.500 --> 01:50:23.500] Oh, that is more powerful than filing a criminal complaint [01:50:23.500 --> 01:50:28.500] In most states it's called POST [01:50:28.500 --> 01:50:32.500] Police Officer Certification and Training [01:50:32.500 --> 01:50:35.500] In Texas it's called TCOLD [01:50:35.500 --> 01:50:38.500] Texas Commission on Law Enforcement [01:50:38.500 --> 01:50:40.500] But most states it's called POST [01:50:40.500 --> 01:50:45.500] You want to find the agency that trains and licenses peace officers [01:50:45.500 --> 01:50:51.500] And file a complaint with them claiming that the officer is poorly trained [01:50:51.500 --> 01:50:55.500] You might tell them that he is too terrified [01:50:55.500 --> 01:50:58.500] To be out here on the street with a gun on his hip [01:50:58.500 --> 01:51:02.500] He should be out picking up dead cats and skunks off the highway [01:51:02.500 --> 01:51:06.500] So he won't jeopardize my family [01:51:06.500 --> 01:51:11.500] I have done that to several police officers [01:51:11.500 --> 01:51:16.500] But I would consider that aggravated assault [01:51:16.500 --> 01:51:18.500] Yes [01:51:18.500 --> 01:51:21.500] And you should file that against him [01:51:21.500 --> 01:51:26.500] Don't wait until the civil trial is over, do it first [01:51:26.500 --> 01:51:28.500] Okay [01:51:28.500 --> 01:51:32.500] Read the codes [01:51:32.500 --> 01:51:38.500] What is required when you file a criminal complaint? [01:51:38.500 --> 01:51:43.500] Criminal complaints are generally filed with a magistrate [01:51:43.500 --> 01:51:46.500] Read the Criminal Procedure Code for Arizona [01:51:46.500 --> 01:51:55.500] What is a magistrate required to do when he is presented with a criminal affidavit? [01:51:55.500 --> 01:52:02.500] It's the same as in the Texas Constitution or Texas Code [01:52:02.500 --> 01:52:09.500] Texas Code 15.09 says when a complaint is forwarded to a magistrate [01:52:09.500 --> 01:52:15.500] The magistrate shall issue a warrant forthwith [01:52:15.500 --> 01:52:18.500] Is that what Arizona says? [01:52:18.500 --> 01:52:22.500] I believe that is the same verbiage in Arizona [01:52:22.500 --> 01:52:26.500] Then you file the complaint with the magistrate [01:52:26.500 --> 01:52:35.500] And you ask the magistrate to give you notice of the date on which he issued the warrant [01:52:35.500 --> 01:52:40.500] When you don't receive that notice within seven to ten days [01:52:40.500 --> 01:52:43.500] Then file criminal charges against the magistrate [01:52:43.500 --> 01:52:46.500] And then file a lawsuit against the magistrate [01:52:46.500 --> 01:52:49.500] Look in Arizona law [01:52:49.500 --> 01:53:00.500] In Texas law we have Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code [01:53:00.500 --> 01:53:08.500] 7.001 says that if a public official fails to perform a duty they are required to perform [01:53:08.500 --> 01:53:19.500] The person, he is liable to the person harmed [01:53:19.500 --> 01:53:23.500] That takes away any immunity [01:53:23.500 --> 01:53:27.500] You've probably got something similar in Arizona [01:53:27.500 --> 01:53:31.500] I've been setting up JPs, Justices of the Peace [01:53:31.500 --> 01:53:38.500] To get them not to act on my criminal complaint so that I can sue them personally [01:53:38.500 --> 01:53:45.500] In Texas, if a public official violates a law relating to his office and harms you in the process [01:53:45.500 --> 01:53:48.500] They have no immunity [01:53:48.500 --> 01:53:51.500] Even if they're a judge [01:53:51.500 --> 01:53:53.500] Right [01:53:53.500 --> 01:54:05.500] So the one way to make this go away and to help the system is ask the judge to issue a warrant for the officer's arrest when he refuses [01:54:05.500 --> 01:54:11.500] Then send him notice of intent to sue and then sue him [01:54:11.500 --> 01:54:18.500] And if you want a suit, an example suit, send me an email [01:54:18.500 --> 01:54:20.500] I got one made up [01:54:20.500 --> 01:54:26.500] I went to Victoria County and I gave this JP opportunity to screw up [01:54:26.500 --> 01:54:30.500] And he was very accommodating [01:54:30.500 --> 01:54:36.500] So now I have a civil suit that I'm filing against him if you'll send me an email [01:54:36.500 --> 01:54:39.500] Randy at ruleoflawradio.com [01:54:39.500 --> 01:54:41.500] I'll send you a copy of it [01:54:41.500 --> 01:54:49.500] Look at my Texas law and find Arizona law that is similar [01:54:49.500 --> 01:54:54.500] Most of the states the laws 90% are the same [01:54:54.500 --> 01:54:59.500] And in every state if a public official violates a law and commits a crime against you [01:54:59.500 --> 01:55:04.500] They're not going to be subject to immunity [01:55:04.500 --> 01:55:10.500] So find the law that takes away their immunity, cite it in place of the laws I have [01:55:10.500 --> 01:55:14.500] And file a suit against the judge [01:55:14.500 --> 01:55:22.500] I'm going to dismiss your case to get you to go away and leave him alone [01:55:22.500 --> 01:55:27.500] Yes, I'm looking forward to this [01:55:27.500 --> 01:55:36.500] You know I keep saying on the air that the best fight to have is the one you picked [01:55:36.500 --> 01:55:42.500] So I'm in Rome, Texas, I got a ticket in Rome, Texas now [01:55:42.500 --> 01:55:48.500] I have filed first degree felony aggravated assault against the police officer who wrote me the ticket [01:55:48.500 --> 01:55:50.500] With the chief of police [01:55:50.500 --> 01:55:54.500] He didn't give notice to some magistrate [01:55:54.500 --> 01:55:58.500] So I'm filing criminal charges against him for shielding from prosecution [01:55:58.500 --> 01:56:02.500] He sent it to the prosecuting attorney for the city [01:56:02.500 --> 01:56:08.500] And she didn't give notice to some magistrate so I'm filing criminal charges against her [01:56:08.500 --> 01:56:12.500] I know this works [01:56:12.500 --> 01:56:16.500] Everything is political [01:56:16.500 --> 01:56:22.500] When you start hammering the higher ups for protecting the lower downs [01:56:22.500 --> 01:56:31.500] They tend to throw the lower downs under the bus or come to you and make you an offer you can't pass up [01:56:31.500 --> 01:56:34.500] But I suggest you sue them anyway [01:56:34.500 --> 01:56:37.500] It's great practice [01:56:37.500 --> 01:56:39.500] Big deal ticket [01:56:39.500 --> 01:56:44.500] If you don't fight the ticket they're going to make you a deal [01:56:44.500 --> 01:56:49.500] If you do fight the ticket they're going to make you the same deal [01:56:49.500 --> 01:56:53.500] You got nothing to lose [01:56:53.500 --> 01:56:57.500] And when you fight the ticket they're not accustomed to that [01:56:57.500 --> 01:57:02.500] It almost never happens like 1% of the time [01:57:02.500 --> 01:57:04.500] And they screw up everything [01:57:04.500 --> 01:57:08.500] I just prepared criminal charges against the clerk [01:57:08.500 --> 01:57:12.500] Because she reported me to the DPS accusing me of not showing up [01:57:12.500 --> 01:57:16.500] I did show up but I found a motion [01:57:16.500 --> 01:57:20.500] And that's not something that did generally happen so she didn't really know what to do [01:57:20.500 --> 01:57:26.500] And they didn't get it noticed in the computer that I showed up [01:57:26.500 --> 01:57:32.500] So the Department of Public Safety sent me a notice saying they wouldn't renew my license [01:57:32.500 --> 01:57:37.500] But I didn't show up for this like I promised on this ticket [01:57:37.500 --> 01:57:40.500] She made a mistake [01:57:40.500 --> 01:57:45.500] So I charged her with tampering with a government record [01:57:45.500 --> 01:57:47.500] So what's he going to say? [01:57:47.500 --> 01:57:49.500] Oh I just made a mistake [01:57:49.500 --> 01:57:50.500] Oh me too [01:57:50.500 --> 01:57:53.500] When I was driving 90 miles an hour in a 30 zone [01:57:53.500 --> 01:57:57.500] I just made a mistake [01:57:57.500 --> 01:58:00.500] Good luck guys [01:58:00.500 --> 01:58:02.500] Be pedantic [01:58:02.500 --> 01:58:04.500] Take a minute on the details [01:58:04.500 --> 01:58:06.500] This is where we'll beat them [01:58:06.500 --> 01:58:09.500] We are out of time [01:58:09.500 --> 01:58:13.500] This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Root of Love Radio [01:58:13.500 --> 01:58:17.500] We'll be back tomorrow night for a four hour info marathon [01:58:17.500 --> 01:58:21.500] And if you have more questions AJ call back tomorrow night [01:58:21.500 --> 01:58:25.500] Since you're still a first time caller we'll take you early [01:58:25.500 --> 01:58:33.500] But we did spend a lot of time with Eric today but that is the kinds of issues I like to examine [01:58:33.500 --> 01:58:36.500] The more complex and detailed issues [01:58:36.500 --> 01:58:43.500] And if you'll call back tomorrow night AJ will take yours on in smaller pieces [01:58:43.500 --> 01:58:46.500] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Root of Love Radio [01:58:46.500 --> 01:58:50.500] Thank you all for listening and good night [01:58:50.500 --> 01:58:57.500] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version [01:58:57.500 --> 01:59:04.500] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse [01:59:04.500 --> 01:59:08.500] Helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life [01:59:08.500 --> 01:59:11.500] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America [01:59:11.500 --> 01:59:16.500] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 [01:59:16.500 --> 01:59:20.500] Or visit us online at bfa.org [01:59:20.500 --> 01:59:26.500] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references [01:59:26.500 --> 01:59:30.500] Plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible [01:59:30.500 --> 01:59:32.500] This is truly a Bible you can understand [01:59:32.500 --> 01:59:41.500] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version call us toll free at 888-551-0102 [01:59:41.500 --> 01:59:45.500] That's 888-551-0102 [01:59:45.500 --> 01:59:49.500] Or visit us online at bfa.org