[00:00.000 --> 00:05.080] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution that guarantee [00:05.080 --> 00:08.280] the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:08.280 --> 00:09.760] Our liberty depends on it. [00:09.760 --> 00:13.680] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [00:13.680 --> 00:15.800] your First Amendment rights. [00:15.800 --> 00:17.400] Privacy is under attack. [00:17.400 --> 00:21.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:21.000 --> 00:25.760] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [00:25.760 --> 00:30.840] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:30.840 --> 00:31.840] Privacy. [00:31.840 --> 00:33.520] It's worth hanging on to. [00:33.520 --> 00:37.800] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search [00:37.800 --> 00:41.360] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:41.360 --> 00:43.360] Start over with Startpage. [00:43.360 --> 00:44.360] Spar. [00:44.360 --> 00:46.640] It's what fighters do. [00:46.640 --> 00:49.600] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:49.600 --> 00:53.320] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:53.320 --> 01:00.400] Spar with an extra P. S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, [01:00.400 --> 01:01.760] and R for religion. [01:01.760 --> 01:05.840] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, [01:05.840 --> 01:07.360] assembly, and religion. [01:07.360 --> 01:09.720] But petition for redress is another matter. [01:09.720 --> 01:13.440] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:13.440 --> 01:16.960] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out [01:16.960 --> 01:19.640] the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:19.640 --> 01:29.960] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:29.960 --> 01:33.640] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. [01:33.640 --> 01:37.080] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:37.080 --> 01:38.520] Our liberty depends on it. [01:38.520 --> 01:42.460] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:42.460 --> 01:45.600] one of your constitutional rights. [01:45.600 --> 01:47.200] Privacy is under attack. [01:47.200 --> 01:50.800] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:50.800 --> 01:55.560] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [01:55.560 --> 02:00.560] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:00.560 --> 02:03.320] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [02:03.320 --> 02:07.620] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [02:07.620 --> 02:11.160] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:11.160 --> 02:14.760] Start over with StartPage. [02:14.760 --> 02:19.080] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill [02:19.080 --> 02:21.160] of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:21.160 --> 02:25.680] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms [02:25.680 --> 02:29.480] that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:29.480 --> 02:30.480] Get it? [02:30.480 --> 02:32.800] Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? [02:32.800 --> 02:36.400] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well [02:36.400 --> 02:42.160] when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary [02:42.160 --> 02:46.720] conduct, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which [02:46.720 --> 02:49.360] historically has proved to always be possible. [02:49.360 --> 02:51.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [02:51.320 --> 03:14.760] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:14.760 --> 03:34.960] Good evening, this is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton, I'm Brett Fountain, and this [03:34.960 --> 03:40.080] is Friday, the 3rd of June, 2022. [03:40.080 --> 03:44.480] And I'm going to go ahead and start by opening up the phone lines. [03:44.480 --> 03:51.200] We do not have Randy with us this evening, but feel free to call in, and the number is [03:51.200 --> 03:52.200] 512-646-1984. [03:52.200 --> 03:53.200] 512-646-1984. [03:53.200 --> 04:07.600] So yeah, I heard from Randy, he's having some trouble this evening, he's not going to be [04:07.600 --> 04:10.440] able to join us, probably not. [04:10.440 --> 04:19.920] So call in, or else you just might have to listen to whatever I have to say. [04:19.920 --> 04:24.120] I was thinking about some different things we could talk about. [04:24.120 --> 04:30.640] People seem to be pleased with what they heard in last night's kind of a breakneck, roll [04:30.640 --> 04:34.400] through of discovery in court. [04:34.400 --> 04:41.920] I did re-listen to it myself, and I felt like it came across pretty disjointed, and lots [04:41.920 --> 04:47.560] of ideas, and oh this, oh and that, oh and this, and there's this, but it wasn't presented [04:47.560 --> 04:53.960] in a very linear and modular kind of way, so I apologize about that, if it seemed that [04:53.960 --> 04:54.960] way to you. [04:54.960 --> 05:01.240] Apparently some people were pleased with that, so I'm glad they got something out of it. [05:01.240 --> 05:10.800] Another thing we could talk about this evening is sort of a sister to discovery or a twin [05:10.800 --> 05:14.120] is records requests. [05:14.120 --> 05:21.720] Outside of a court case, if you ever need something, it's going to be accessible via [05:21.720 --> 05:23.720] records requests. [05:23.720 --> 05:27.960] You don't have discovery tools until you're in court, but sometimes you're not going to [05:27.960 --> 05:33.840] get to court very quickly, you may not even know yet who the defendants are or whether [05:33.840 --> 05:39.800] you exactly have a case, you might just need to be figuring it out. [05:39.800 --> 05:40.800] Who are you charging? [05:40.800 --> 05:43.000] What are you charging them with? [05:43.000 --> 05:44.520] Maybe you're not even going to sue them. [05:44.520 --> 05:49.440] Maybe you just come with enough details, you figure out, oh this is just a criminal matter [05:49.440 --> 05:55.580] and I'm just going to handle it like that. [05:55.580 --> 06:04.320] Maybe just to a little side note here, criminal and civil, some people tend to get that mixed [06:04.320 --> 06:11.720] up or maybe not realize that there is a distinction and let me just briefly touch on what happens [06:11.720 --> 06:19.320] in a court, if you're charging somebody criminally with something, then you don't have standing [06:19.320 --> 06:20.600] in the case. [06:20.600 --> 06:26.920] You are doing your part, like your civic duty to, hey I'm aware of some crime, I'm going [06:26.920 --> 06:32.000] to go ahead and put a piece of paperwork into the proper hopper and somebody's going to [06:32.000 --> 06:38.160] do something about it, but you're not going to get any money out of this. [06:38.160 --> 06:43.160] You may or may not get called in as a witness up on the witness stand in some court case [06:43.160 --> 06:55.280] if they do get a determination of probable cause, whether it's a grand jury or a magistrate, [06:55.280 --> 06:58.080] they might have to stand in answer for this or they might not. [06:58.080 --> 07:02.840] It depends on what happens along the way, but either way you're not getting any money [07:02.840 --> 07:03.840] out of the deal. [07:03.840 --> 07:12.840] You've just simply done your good deed, sort of the way I look at it is I am fulfilling [07:12.840 --> 07:16.280] my implicit responsibility to my fellow man. [07:16.280 --> 07:24.480] You know we all want to have peace and seek peace and pursue peace as much as it depends [07:24.480 --> 07:28.200] on you, peace with all men. [07:28.200 --> 07:36.520] And part of this, part of your peace depends on me pursuing peace and vice versa. [07:36.520 --> 07:44.520] Part of my ability to live in peace with all men is going to depend on you doing your civic [07:44.520 --> 07:51.660] duty when you see some public official, one of these people that we hired, going off and [07:51.660 --> 07:57.600] doing things they're not allowed to do, either they're unauthorized or they are refusing [07:57.600 --> 08:01.000] to do the things that they have a duty to do. [08:01.000 --> 08:08.680] That's a crime and that works against our peace, the peace of all fellow men, right? [08:08.680 --> 08:18.160] So sometimes when you're, back to records requests, sometimes you're finding some facts, [08:18.160 --> 08:20.480] you're figuring out what's going on. [08:20.480 --> 08:28.080] We have some people in Texas right now figuring out, oh my goodness, there's so much sexual [08:28.080 --> 08:34.520] perversion being pushed in some schools. [08:34.520 --> 08:36.880] And what in the world are we going to do about that? [08:36.880 --> 08:39.280] So they're starting out with records requests. [08:39.280 --> 08:45.840] They haven't exactly figured out who's doing this, although obviously it's horrible. [08:45.840 --> 08:56.080] They're teaching kindergartners about things that I didn't hear about until maybe 40. [08:56.080 --> 09:05.480] So it's completely inappropriate and yet how do you approach this? [09:05.480 --> 09:09.360] You're not necessarily going to start out suing somebody. [09:09.360 --> 09:13.920] You don't know exactly what the charges are to claim. [09:13.920 --> 09:19.560] You can't say, I'm going to claim that they, you have to have a cause of action, right? [09:19.560 --> 09:22.200] Well, first off, let's get some data. [09:22.200 --> 09:23.200] Let's get some information. [09:23.200 --> 09:30.960] What are the names of these books, who ordered them, who authorizes this, which budget did [09:30.960 --> 09:39.640] it come out of, which eyes looked at this and checked off on it, who's deciding to bring [09:39.640 --> 09:40.640] this in the first place? [09:40.640 --> 09:46.040] So you start figuring that out, start following the money and now you have some information [09:46.040 --> 09:47.480] that you can charge people with. [09:47.480 --> 09:50.040] Now you have some names too. [09:50.040 --> 09:55.680] But anyway, records requests are like discovery. [09:55.680 --> 10:03.240] You're asking people to produce records, except records requests is more broad. [10:03.240 --> 10:10.800] Discovery is, I'm sorry, the discovery is more broad. [10:10.800 --> 10:16.680] Records requests are just for your governmental officials. [10:16.680 --> 10:26.440] You cannot go to a grocery store and ask them to produce records. [10:26.440 --> 10:31.000] If you feel like you have a case, you need to do something called pre-litigation discovery [10:31.000 --> 10:35.440] because that's the only way, discovery is the only way you're going to get somebody [10:35.440 --> 10:41.120] that's not a governmental official to produce records. [10:41.120 --> 10:48.000] Now outside of a case, you want records, you can be asking for all kinds of things. [10:48.000 --> 10:52.560] It doesn't have to be about getting somebody in trouble. [10:52.560 --> 10:59.260] You could be, there could be no problem, but you're just curious. [10:59.260 --> 11:07.120] How many people have filed such and such a paper form for property taxes in this county [11:07.120 --> 11:12.760] over here and you can reach out to that county and you can ask them for those records and [11:12.760 --> 11:14.880] they must answer you. [11:14.880 --> 11:21.680] There's a different set of rules in different states and jurisdictions. [11:21.680 --> 11:27.720] In the Fed it's called FOIA and in different states they have different little acronyms [11:27.720 --> 11:36.360] that support the mandate for governmental transparency. [11:36.360 --> 11:48.000] Texas, it's the Texas government code section 552 and it has a handy little acronym PIA, [11:48.000 --> 11:51.480] Public Information Act, and it's different in different states, they'll have different [11:51.480 --> 11:56.920] little acronyms in different places, but you just go find your local transparency mandate [11:56.920 --> 11:59.800] that are statutorily required to respond to us. [11:59.800 --> 12:03.880] We the people created the government, these are instruments of our creation and they're [12:03.880 --> 12:08.720] serving us, the people. [12:08.720 --> 12:15.560] When we decide we want to see some records, well, they better hop to it. [12:15.560 --> 12:17.520] I think I might just pause on this. [12:17.520 --> 12:20.400] I just noticed that our caller board is full already. [12:20.400 --> 12:24.160] I'm going to go ahead and start taking some calls. [12:24.160 --> 12:29.280] We'll get back to records requests if we hit a lull, but I'd like to not leave you guys [12:29.280 --> 12:30.280] waiting. [12:30.280 --> 12:36.720] Let's see, we've got four minutes until the next break and our first caller here is Nicholas [12:36.720 --> 12:37.720] in Nevada. [12:37.720 --> 12:38.720] Good evening, Nicholas. [12:38.720 --> 12:39.720] What's on your mind? [12:39.720 --> 12:44.480] Well, hello and thanks for having me. [12:44.480 --> 12:55.240] I called on Thursday a week ago and I have a criminal complaint based on the Fourth Amendment, [12:55.240 --> 13:03.800] the First Amendment and then the Nevada Article 1, Section 18, which says that we are not [13:03.800 --> 13:09.800] to be put under unreasonable seizure and search unless there's an issuance of a warrant and [13:09.800 --> 13:11.280] that we're securing our persons. [13:11.280 --> 13:21.240] And yet, only at the Board of County Commissioners here in Washoe County do they put up a mental [13:21.240 --> 13:28.720] detector and then they have you empty your pockets or look through people's purses and [13:28.720 --> 13:33.440] handbags before they allow you to go in the chambers. [13:33.440 --> 13:39.200] I started challenging them, asking them by what authority they had to violate my Fourth [13:39.200 --> 13:43.000] Amendment and challenge them that I have the right to go in. [13:43.000 --> 13:48.360] They said, you only have a right to go in here if you will submit to a violation of [13:48.360 --> 13:49.360] your Fourth Amendment. [13:49.360 --> 13:54.400] So, I asked them what their authority was and they said they had a piracy. [13:54.400 --> 13:55.400] Oh, that's interesting. [13:55.400 --> 14:02.920] So, I said, show me the piracy and they said, you can go up to the manager's office and [14:02.920 --> 14:03.920] get it. [14:03.920 --> 14:10.400] So, I did before all that, I had gone ahead and put in a public records request like you [14:10.400 --> 14:18.600] were just talking about and ended up with an email that came back and said because some [14:18.600 --> 14:27.960] guy had gone in in 2015 and purportedly was threatening to drink pesticide in the chambers [14:27.960 --> 14:35.160] and because there were other things going on around the country that somehow somebody [14:35.160 --> 14:43.800] decided that they would put up a mental detector and screen us even though there was no probable [14:43.800 --> 14:46.200] cause and there was no warrant. [14:46.200 --> 14:51.240] And so, I challenged them on, so they sent the thing back which really didn't answer [14:51.240 --> 14:52.240] the question. [14:52.240 --> 14:55.840] The only thing it did say was that there wasn't a written one. [14:55.840 --> 15:00.200] So, I've been back numerous times, now I've been back five times, I record every single [15:00.200 --> 15:01.200] one of them. [15:01.200 --> 15:04.000] Now, wait a second, this wasn't written, written what? [15:04.000 --> 15:05.000] A policy? [15:05.000 --> 15:06.000] A written request. [15:06.000 --> 15:07.000] No, written policy. [15:07.000 --> 15:08.000] Oh. [15:08.000 --> 15:09.000] So, I go in. [15:09.000 --> 15:10.000] Wait. [15:10.000 --> 15:14.760] So, this policy is just in people's head? [15:14.760 --> 15:15.760] Apparently. [15:15.760 --> 15:16.760] Wow. [15:16.760 --> 15:17.760] Okay. [15:17.760 --> 15:22.240] So, every time I go in, I demand they show me the policy and so we've been around and [15:22.240 --> 15:28.400] around and around at the point that they finally bring out the head of security for the Washoe [15:28.400 --> 15:32.000] County, the administrator of Washoe County security. [15:32.000 --> 15:37.640] So, Ben West came in and I've been around and around with him now and on the last time [15:37.640 --> 15:43.560] I finally got him to stay on record with us recording it from two different people that [15:43.560 --> 15:44.920] there was no written policy. [15:44.920 --> 15:51.800] I said, then you don't have the right to violate and force me to do, you know, get [15:51.800 --> 15:53.800] searched. [15:53.800 --> 15:57.120] And so, I've talked to the sheriff's department, I've talked to one of the top guys, one of [15:57.120 --> 16:03.600] the chiefs there and said, listen, they either forced me to violate the Fourth Amendment [16:03.600 --> 16:09.080] so I can have my first or they deny me my first because I refuse to be violated through [16:09.080 --> 16:11.240] my fourth. [16:11.240 --> 16:15.640] And so, they're supposed to have talked to the head of security, that went nowhere. [16:15.640 --> 16:21.840] So, then I called 911 and they sent out five sheriff deputies to talk to me and they've [16:21.840 --> 16:27.520] called the sheriff on me before, several of these guys already know me. [16:27.520 --> 16:35.840] And they decided that we're in different times and so they're just trying to protect everyone [16:35.840 --> 16:36.840] and that's the policy. [16:36.840 --> 16:37.840] Different times. [16:37.840 --> 16:42.240] They decided they were going to do by policy, they'd be policy enforcement officers instead [16:42.240 --> 16:44.960] of law enforcement officers. [16:44.960 --> 16:46.960] We are in different times. [16:46.960 --> 16:47.960] Okay. [16:47.960 --> 16:51.560] Well, that's going to not hold up for them very well. [16:51.560 --> 16:53.280] Let's talk about this some more. [16:53.280 --> 16:59.320] We're just about to go to our sponsors and we will be right back. [16:59.320 --> 17:04.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits? [17:04.000 --> 17:08.120] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [17:08.120 --> 17:12.440] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you [17:12.440 --> 17:13.440] can win too. [17:13.440 --> 17:18.400] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [17:18.400 --> 17:24.040] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer [17:24.040 --> 17:28.680] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the [17:28.680 --> 17:32.880] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [17:32.880 --> 17:37.680] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [17:37.680 --> 17:39.840] Personal consultation is available as well. [17:39.840 --> 17:45.640] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner [17:45.640 --> 17:48.640] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [17:48.640 --> 17:57.640] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-m at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt [17:57.640 --> 17:59.640] collectors now. [17:59.640 --> 18:03.640] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [18:03.640 --> 18:07.520] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society and if we, the people, are ever going [18:07.520 --> 18:11.080] to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [18:11.080 --> 18:14.680] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [18:14.680 --> 18:18.320] in our own private capacity and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [18:18.320 --> 18:22.560] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [18:22.560 --> 18:23.920] our rights through due process. [18:23.920 --> 18:27.920] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the [18:27.920 --> 18:31.720] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process [18:31.720 --> 18:33.760] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [18:33.760 --> 18:38.080] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [18:38.080 --> 18:39.440] ordering your copy today. [18:39.440 --> 18:42.800] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [18:42.800 --> 18:47.200] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [18:47.200 --> 18:49.520] documents and other useful resource material. [18:49.520 --> 18:53.480] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [18:53.480 --> 18:57.200] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [18:57.200 --> 18:58.200] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, www.logosradionetwork.com. [18:58.200 --> 19:27.120] Okay. [19:27.120 --> 19:28.120] We are back. [19:28.120 --> 19:30.920] This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton. [19:30.920 --> 19:36.320] I'm Brett Fountain and we're talking this evening with Nicholas in Nevada. [19:36.320 --> 19:42.600] Nicholas, right before we went to the sponsors, you were telling us that you've got federal [19:42.600 --> 19:50.320] complaints and you've got them to admit that they don't have any business blocking you [19:50.320 --> 19:51.320] from there. [19:51.320 --> 19:54.840] They don't even have their policy, which can't override law anyway. [19:54.840 --> 20:02.600] And their policy unwritten is to deny you and your rights, to deprive you of fundamental [20:02.600 --> 20:04.640] protected rights. [20:04.640 --> 20:09.360] And that the only thing that they've come up with so far is because these are different [20:09.360 --> 20:10.360] times. [20:10.360 --> 20:15.880] So where are you planning on going with this or is that your question? [20:15.880 --> 20:21.440] Well, I have written criminal complaint on five of them. [20:21.440 --> 20:27.760] I have one against the county commissioner, who is chair of the board when they put in [20:27.760 --> 20:29.400] the metal detector. [20:29.400 --> 20:35.560] I have one against Richard Shire, who is the head of Allied Universal Security, which is [20:35.560 --> 20:44.080] a private security firm that manages somewhat security for the county buildings, although [20:44.080 --> 20:48.040] women have the authority to trespass because they always have to call the sheriff. [20:48.040 --> 20:56.080] I have one against Ben West, who is the head of Washoe County Security, he's the administrator. [20:56.080 --> 21:03.000] And I have one against the sheriff officer, the deputy that was there, who I tried to [21:03.000 --> 21:08.640] engage and he refused to even engage and said, you've already talked to them, I'm not going [21:08.640 --> 21:10.680] to talk to you about this. [21:10.680 --> 21:13.560] And so I have five complaints already written. [21:13.560 --> 21:19.960] It covers everything from the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, Nevada Constitution, [21:19.960 --> 21:27.200] Article 1, Section 18, which is the same thing as the Fourth Amendment, coercion, they forced [21:27.200 --> 21:35.120] me to go through the detector, which is NRS Code 207.190, that's listed here, coercion. [21:35.120 --> 21:40.440] Also, because they kept me out of the meeting, I found out that they're actually a violation [21:40.440 --> 21:45.600] of NRS 203.090, disturbing a meeting, and they're disturbing the meeting by keeping [21:45.600 --> 21:51.680] someone who has every right and legal right to go to a lawful meeting out of that meeting [21:51.680 --> 21:53.960] and that's against the law. [21:53.960 --> 22:06.920] I also have another one, NRS 200.571.1.B, which also is harassment, because they only [22:06.920 --> 22:13.080] do this when we come in just for that one meeting held in those, in that building. [22:13.080 --> 22:20.160] So I have all of this put together and then I have one final one where it's all, it's [22:20.160 --> 22:21.160] conspiracy. [22:21.160 --> 22:27.120] So they don't have, there's no due process, there's no provocals, there's no warrants, [22:27.120 --> 22:35.040] and 199.4803E says to prevent another from doing any other lawful act by force, threats [22:35.040 --> 22:37.000] or intimidation. [22:37.000 --> 22:45.400] So I have all of this outlined, plus I think I have the deprivation, Title 18, USC 242, [22:45.400 --> 22:47.160] deprivation of rights under the color of law. [22:47.160 --> 22:54.160] So I have all of that in my two-page criminal complaint and I've looked at the magistrates [22:54.160 --> 23:03.080] and I found a magistrate here to file that with and I would like some input on what that [23:03.080 --> 23:09.520] looks like if you, you know, I guess you, I know Randy filed them, I'm guessing you [23:09.520 --> 23:10.520] filed them. [23:10.520 --> 23:13.160] What does that process look like once I file it? [23:13.160 --> 23:16.840] Are there fees that go along with that, which I don't think there are, but once I file [23:16.840 --> 23:21.880] it, what am I expecting to see after that, how long, because Randy doesn't expect them [23:21.880 --> 23:22.880] to do anything, right? [23:22.880 --> 23:26.160] They're going to table it or they're going to come up with some excuse not to do it, [23:26.160 --> 23:32.200] because in here, my opening statement is pursuant to my rights under the First Amendment of [23:32.200 --> 23:37.440] the United States Constitution, right to petition, hereby request that official appropriate criminal [23:37.440 --> 23:45.320] charges be filed against and that I name all five of these people separately so that each [23:45.320 --> 23:48.280] one of them gets their own separate criminal complaint. [23:48.280 --> 23:52.560] Okay, so let's just back up here, just back up a moment. [23:52.560 --> 24:00.240] You are, you are the one that's filing charges, you're not asking someone else to. [24:00.240 --> 24:05.840] Your criminal complaints need to land in the lap of someone who has a duty to act on them. [24:05.840 --> 24:12.600] So you're not asking somebody to write charges or to file charges. [24:12.600 --> 24:19.960] Your complaint is the lighting of the fuse, if you will. [24:19.960 --> 24:26.960] And it sounds like your issues here are federal issues, and so you'll be looking at federal [24:26.960 --> 24:28.840] rules of criminal procedure. [24:28.840 --> 24:40.840] And rule three describes what happens and you take your complaint, in a state you take [24:40.840 --> 24:45.560] your complaint to a notary public first, right, and get it notarized and then you put it in [24:45.560 --> 24:46.560] the lap of somebody. [24:46.560 --> 24:52.400] In the Fed, it's a little different, you take your complaint and you go to the federal magistrate [24:52.400 --> 24:53.400] judge. [24:53.400 --> 25:01.480] They have certain groups of judges that they specifically call federal magistrate judges. [25:01.480 --> 25:04.400] And they're going to refuse to see you. [25:04.400 --> 25:09.680] They need to, they need to see you, but that's another fight that you can take up in parallel [25:09.680 --> 25:11.340] if you want to. [25:11.340 --> 25:18.320] But all you have to do, you make an effort to see them, and then when they refuse, rule [25:18.320 --> 25:26.600] three says that you can go to any state or local judicial officer, which means you can [25:26.600 --> 25:28.920] run down to your local JP after that. [25:28.920 --> 25:35.680] You make an attempt to go see, you know, guy number one here, federal magistrate judge. [25:35.680 --> 25:42.120] You've got a bunch of roided up federal marshals acting like you don't belong there and you're [25:42.120 --> 25:44.760] a scary person so you better leave. [25:44.760 --> 25:46.760] And well, do you have an appointment? [25:46.760 --> 25:47.760] No. [25:47.760 --> 25:48.760] Are you making an appointment right now? [25:48.760 --> 25:49.760] No. [25:49.760 --> 25:52.320] So they're going to kick you out. [25:52.320 --> 25:59.800] And then you just go ahead and go see any state or local judicial officer. [25:59.800 --> 26:07.280] So at that point, your criminal complaint is you've lit the fuse. [26:07.280 --> 26:11.120] Does that make sense? [26:11.120 --> 26:17.740] I sort of, I mean, going to that, I mean, I would go to a federal, now again, this complaint [26:17.740 --> 26:24.680] has a lot of the NRS codes, which are Nevada revised statutes listed in there. [26:24.680 --> 26:30.800] So I'm not sure it's a, I mean, it eventually is federal because it's first and fourth amendment [26:30.800 --> 26:33.960] plus fifth and the rest of them that's in the US. [26:33.960 --> 26:39.600] Yeah, that's the ones that you've been saying that your claimings got violated. [26:39.600 --> 26:50.960] So Nevada, it was the Nevada offenses that they committed, but it was your federal, federally [26:50.960 --> 26:53.920] protected rights that you're saying got violated. [26:53.920 --> 26:58.360] If you want to convert that over to all Nevada, then you can deal with it only in Nevada. [26:58.360 --> 26:59.360] That's fine too. [26:59.360 --> 27:04.400] In which case you need to look at your Nevada rules of criminal procedure or code of criminal [27:04.400 --> 27:05.400] procedure. [27:05.400 --> 27:07.560] Take a look at what Nevada says and you can do that too. [27:07.560 --> 27:11.080] I do have one suggestion for you. [27:11.080 --> 27:18.600] It sounded to me like you're going after this little guy and that little guy, the ones who [27:18.600 --> 27:22.520] are actually in your face. [27:22.520 --> 27:32.320] And you might get more traction if you were to accuse the county judge, accuse the sheriff [27:32.320 --> 27:39.280] himself, not that one deputy, then the sheriff is going to try to cover it for the deputy. [27:39.280 --> 27:50.120] But you'd go after the sheriff and go after the county judge, go after the county commissioners. [27:50.120 --> 27:53.080] They're allowing this crime to go on. [27:53.080 --> 27:56.560] They're in charge and they're failing miserably. [27:56.560 --> 28:02.440] You've got a chair, sorry, you've got a chair, what? [28:02.440 --> 28:05.680] Complaints is against the chair of the county commissioners. [28:05.680 --> 28:09.440] Okay, usually that's the county judge, right? [28:09.440 --> 28:12.200] No, he's an elected official. [28:12.200 --> 28:15.000] Okay, you've got a separate thing. [28:15.000 --> 28:23.680] Yeah, so these people, I picture it like if there's a tree that is precarious and it needs [28:23.680 --> 28:28.520] to come down, it looks dangerous, this tree is going to hurt somebody, you need to take [28:28.520 --> 28:29.520] that tree down. [28:29.520 --> 28:34.200] You don't start by flipping the leaves with the nail clipper, you start by taking an ax [28:34.200 --> 28:36.240] to the root. [28:36.240 --> 28:44.360] And that's how it feels like, I mean, my suggestion, you might consider to look at who's the defendant [28:44.360 --> 28:48.240] in these things that you're, it looks like you've got something that's very well thought [28:48.240 --> 28:53.400] out and put together, so maybe consider who you're accusing of doing it. [28:53.400 --> 28:54.400] Confusing? [28:54.400 --> 28:59.200] That's the part that's confusing to me, because after I heard Randy, he started talking about [28:59.200 --> 29:04.960] doing this at the level and then you take it to a JOP, he ignores you, so you take it [29:04.960 --> 29:07.800] to the district, they ignore you, you take it to the appellate, they ignore you, and [29:07.800 --> 29:12.640] then you take it to the Supreme Court and then you can recarge it. [29:12.640 --> 29:20.680] So, you know, again, I'm kind of blundering my way through this and that's why I wanted [29:20.680 --> 29:23.720] to call in, was to try to get a little clarity. [29:23.720 --> 29:29.080] No, you're exactly right, that's exactly what you do. [29:29.080 --> 29:33.440] It doesn't exactly matter who's first and who's last, but it makes sense to take the [29:33.440 --> 29:38.760] progression and go from the little guy, let's say little, you know, you're not starting [29:38.760 --> 29:44.120] from the guy who's in your face, but you're starting from some judge that's relatively [29:44.120 --> 29:48.120] local and you're moving up the chain and that kind of makes sense. [29:48.120 --> 29:52.120] You don't, let's start out with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State [29:52.120 --> 29:55.120] because he hasn't even been made aware of it. [29:55.120 --> 30:01.560] Okay, we will continue in just a moment. [30:01.560 --> 30:05.160] It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work, but have they negatively [30:05.160 --> 30:06.160] affected our health? [30:06.160 --> 30:10.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with new findings about how [30:10.320 --> 30:14.640] cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry. [30:14.640 --> 30:16.240] Privacy is under attack. [30:16.240 --> 30:20.640] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again and once your privacy [30:20.640 --> 30:24.640] is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:24.640 --> 30:29.760] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:29.760 --> 30:32.400] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:32.400 --> 30:36.680] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [30:36.680 --> 30:40.220] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. [30:40.220 --> 30:44.040] Start over with StartPage. [30:44.040 --> 30:46.160] Cell phones emit radio frequency energy. [30:46.160 --> 30:47.160] That's a fact. [30:47.160 --> 30:50.680] But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation near your head [30:50.680 --> 30:51.680] has been disputed. [30:51.680 --> 30:56.080] Some have blamed it for brain tumors while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns. [30:56.080 --> 31:00.560] Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association is confirming that cell phones [31:00.560 --> 31:01.560] affect brain chemistry. [31:01.560 --> 31:07.200] A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism in the area of the brain closest [31:07.200 --> 31:10.880] to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on. [31:10.880 --> 31:14.760] While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage, I'm not taking any [31:14.760 --> 31:15.760] chances. [31:15.760 --> 31:19.200] I always keep the phone far from my body and I use a corded headset. [31:19.200 --> 31:21.200] Look after Catherine Albrecht. [31:21.200 --> 31:29.520] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:29.520 --> 31:30.520] I lost my son. [31:30.520 --> 31:31.520] My nephew. [31:31.520 --> 31:32.520] My uncle. [31:32.520 --> 31:33.520] My son. [31:33.520 --> 31:34.520] On September 11, 2001. [31:34.520 --> 31:37.800] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11. [31:37.800 --> 31:41.920] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. [31:41.920 --> 31:47.760] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, over 1,200 architects [31:47.760 --> 31:51.520] and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story. [31:51.520 --> 31:53.000] Bring justice to my son. [31:53.000 --> 31:54.000] My uncle. [31:54.000 --> 31:55.000] My nephew. [31:55.000 --> 31:56.000] My son. [31:56.000 --> 31:57.000] Go to buildingwhat.org. [31:57.000 --> 32:00.720] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [32:00.720 --> 32:05.120] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [32:05.120 --> 32:06.120] Word? [32:06.120 --> 32:11.240] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture [32:11.240 --> 32:17.640] Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [32:17.640 --> 32:22.160] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly [32:22.160 --> 32:24.600] dividing the word of truth. [32:24.600 --> 32:28.560] Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse [32:28.560 --> 32:31.880] by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [32:31.880 --> 32:36.520] Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [32:36.520 --> 32:38.880] and Christian character development. [32:38.880 --> 32:43.400] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [32:43.400 --> 32:47.800] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness [32:47.800 --> 32:49.400] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [32:49.400 --> 32:56.640] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com, Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and [32:56.640 --> 32:59.080] motivate your studies of the scriptures. [32:59.080 --> 33:09.080] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com. [33:29.080 --> 33:41.480] Okay, we are back with the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Felton, I'm Brett Fountain, and we are [33:41.480 --> 33:43.680] talking with Nicholas in Nevada. [33:43.680 --> 33:51.200] Nicholas, when we went out to our sponsors, you were saying that you are not quite sure [33:51.200 --> 33:54.080] you understand the routine, but you described it pretty well. [33:54.080 --> 33:58.120] You invited out there exactly like if you did understand it. [33:58.120 --> 34:01.760] But part of it is not quite clicking with you. [34:01.760 --> 34:10.040] Okay, so my next step is to take all five of these, which I have notarized, and I'm [34:10.040 --> 34:13.240] going to take them to adjust those fees here. [34:13.240 --> 34:18.880] I've already found one of the judges that I want to take them to, and so I submit them. [34:18.880 --> 34:22.240] I don't think there's any fees that are associated with that. [34:22.240 --> 34:24.280] I file them with them. [34:24.280 --> 34:25.280] And then... [34:25.280 --> 34:26.280] You're correct. [34:26.280 --> 34:27.280] No fees. [34:27.280 --> 34:35.080] So, how long do they have to, you know, Randy thinks that they're, well, his experience [34:35.080 --> 34:39.200] typically has been, they're not going to do anything with it, so I file it with them. [34:39.200 --> 34:45.760] How do I keep a paper trail that I filed it with them, and how long do they have to act [34:45.760 --> 34:50.760] on it before I come to the conclusion they're not going to act and I take it to the next [34:50.760 --> 34:51.760] level? [34:51.760 --> 34:56.280] Okay, yeah, good question. [34:56.280 --> 35:04.920] So that will be specific to, both of those questions are specific to your rules, and [35:04.920 --> 35:09.400] it'll be local to, if you're doing this in Nevada, then you have to look at the Nevada [35:09.400 --> 35:14.760] criminal procedure and see where is this duty imposed on that magistrate. [35:14.760 --> 35:20.600] Or if you're taking it to a grand jury, which I like to do, I guess we don't talk about [35:20.600 --> 35:23.600] that a whole lot, but I like to take these to a grand jury. [35:23.600 --> 35:29.080] The grand jury has a duty, just like a magistrate does, to act on the criminal complaint and [35:29.080 --> 35:31.520] inquire into the matter. [35:31.520 --> 35:36.640] And so, if they true bill it, then that means they're going to go ahead and commence a case. [35:36.640 --> 35:41.640] And if they no bill, that means they looked at your paperwork, they don't think that [35:41.640 --> 35:42.640] it's a crime. [35:42.640 --> 35:45.920] Even if it's true, it's not a crime. [35:45.920 --> 35:53.280] So the matter of whether or not it's true is something to figure out in court, but is [35:53.280 --> 35:57.320] it an issue that needs to be heard by a court if it were true, that's something they're [35:57.320 --> 36:00.080] trying to figure out up front. [36:00.080 --> 36:03.360] And so, how many days do they have? [36:03.360 --> 36:07.240] It's probably easier to tell that with the grand jury, well, at least in Texas, we don't [36:07.240 --> 36:08.240] have a number of days. [36:08.240 --> 36:14.520] In Texas, you just pretty much guess, you say, hey, I kind of expected to hear from [36:14.520 --> 36:19.720] him by now, I haven't seen anything, I haven't heard anything. [36:19.720 --> 36:24.800] So then I go talk to the clerk of the court where he would have commenced a case. [36:24.800 --> 36:31.360] If it's a district thing for a felony or if it's a county issue, if it's maybe not [36:31.360 --> 36:36.000] quite a felony, go to the county clerk or the district clerk and say, hey, I'd like [36:36.000 --> 36:41.480] to see the 17.31 order that came from judge, what, he didn't, what, what order, what are [36:41.480 --> 36:42.480] you talking about? [36:42.480 --> 36:45.840] Because they never have any of those. [36:45.840 --> 36:50.240] But you asked, they said they don't know what it is, never had it, don't have it, [36:50.240 --> 36:51.240] whatever. [36:51.240 --> 36:58.080] And now you've got your reasons to believe and you do believe that that judge is a criminal. [36:58.080 --> 37:02.160] So you write up the next criminal complaint and hand it to another judge, a different [37:02.160 --> 37:03.160] magistrate. [37:03.160 --> 37:07.880] And typically like what Reggie is describing, you're going up the chain. [37:07.880 --> 37:12.600] I don't always go up the chain. [37:12.600 --> 37:21.680] Sometimes it's more politically, you can make more of a mess for them by getting some little [37:21.680 --> 37:32.960] guy in a little town who's, he's in the same county so he can hear the issues, but he, [37:32.960 --> 37:39.600] maybe somebody that was his running, he was running for the same position as judge. [37:39.600 --> 37:44.200] And now the judge that you're holding accountable was his opponent, right? [37:44.200 --> 37:54.000] And so it just depends, you can stir up some, it depends on whether you're really trying [37:54.000 --> 38:00.640] to hold everybody accountable or whether you really want these things to be somebody to [38:00.640 --> 38:01.640] act on them. [38:01.640 --> 38:04.520] I guess there's two different purposes there, right? [38:04.520 --> 38:08.560] Not necessarily the same pattern. [38:08.560 --> 38:11.160] But so there, yeah, that's, that's what I would do. [38:11.160 --> 38:14.520] Look at your local rules and see if it specifies days. [38:14.520 --> 38:20.280] If it doesn't look at what the duty that's imposed on him, look at what it says he's [38:20.280 --> 38:21.280] going to do. [38:21.280 --> 38:22.920] If he does his job, what is it? [38:22.920 --> 38:27.840] Oh, he has to fold up this document, put it in an envelope and give it to the clerk. [38:27.840 --> 38:28.840] Okay, great. [38:28.840 --> 38:30.840] So you go ask the clerk for that document. [38:30.840 --> 38:31.840] I want to see it. [38:31.840 --> 38:33.840] Well, he never gave it to me. [38:33.840 --> 38:34.840] Boom. [38:34.840 --> 38:35.840] Okay. [38:35.840 --> 38:40.120] So that's your question. [38:40.120 --> 38:52.480] Yeah, I guess, I mean, obviously, I've got a lot more research to do on finding what [38:52.480 --> 39:00.360] the requirements of the JOP is once I file this with them. [39:00.360 --> 39:08.120] But ultimately, according to the laws that I've seen, I present this to just for the [39:08.120 --> 39:09.120] peace. [39:09.120 --> 39:18.800] He can issue a warrant for the arrest of all, either of these people for not doing their [39:18.800 --> 39:23.920] job, which is what he should do because I presented to him a very clear case. [39:23.920 --> 39:24.920] I have it videoed. [39:24.920 --> 39:34.640] He can review the video and I'll have one affidavit that I'll have filled out by someone [39:34.640 --> 39:38.840] who also took the video, one of the other people taking the video as I was videoing [39:38.840 --> 39:39.840] it as well. [39:39.840 --> 39:40.840] So they saw... [39:40.840 --> 39:46.080] You're most likely not going to get an opportunity to show your video. [39:46.080 --> 39:54.360] This is not in a court case and it's possible that you could get a JP to look at your video, [39:54.360 --> 39:57.800] but I would say not very likely. [39:57.800 --> 40:01.120] I have a link in the complaint directly to the video. [40:01.120 --> 40:05.640] So if there's any question he has about whether it's happened or not, he can go over to the [40:05.640 --> 40:07.880] video if in the complaint. [40:07.880 --> 40:10.320] Well, that's handy. [40:10.320 --> 40:13.200] It might not be admissible. [40:13.200 --> 40:15.560] They might not accept it as evidence. [40:15.560 --> 40:20.360] However, justices of the peace are a lot more informal. [40:20.360 --> 40:32.000] So sometimes they will bend the regulations of formality and they have a little more flexibility [40:32.000 --> 40:33.000] to do that. [40:33.000 --> 40:35.440] Just say, let's just cut the crap. [40:35.440 --> 40:36.440] Let me see the video. [40:36.440 --> 40:38.800] Yeah, that's pretty obvious. [40:38.800 --> 40:50.440] Whereas a district judge is a lot more bound to follow... [40:50.440 --> 40:54.520] There are all these rules of evidence that you have to make sure that what you're bringing [40:54.520 --> 41:00.360] to the court, like some video, you've done certain things, you've kept a chain of custody, [41:00.360 --> 41:04.360] whatever, and you have to follow those rules of evidence or else they're going to say it's [41:04.360 --> 41:08.120] inadmissible and you don't have any evidence. [41:08.120 --> 41:11.200] Just your word against his and then what? [41:11.200 --> 41:17.640] So justices of the peace, by definition, get to be more informal. [41:17.640 --> 41:20.920] So that might help. [41:20.920 --> 41:22.360] All right. [41:22.360 --> 41:24.480] Well, next week we'll find out. [41:24.480 --> 41:31.040] I'll report on Thursday or Friday next week about how that goes and I just need to find [41:31.040 --> 41:38.040] out how many days they have to act on this and then proceed from there. [41:38.040 --> 41:39.040] Great. [41:39.040 --> 41:44.480] Good job pulling all that together because you've got all those statutes ready to go. [41:44.480 --> 41:46.280] That you have to build your case. [41:46.280 --> 41:52.000] And so I am very particular about getting witnesses and making sure that I build the [41:52.000 --> 41:59.440] case so that when it comes to presenting it, someone says, well, you know, they didn't [41:59.440 --> 42:04.080] violate this law and here's what he said, that's a direct violation of that law. [42:04.080 --> 42:06.720] Here's what he did, that's a direct violation of that law. [42:06.720 --> 42:13.800] So if you are, if you were reporting crime, you're probably not going to be the one presenting [42:13.800 --> 42:14.800] this. [42:14.800 --> 42:22.640] It'll be available for the accuser, which will be technically the state, the people, [42:22.640 --> 42:26.760] and then some prosecutor will be the one that's talking about this to the grand jury. [42:26.760 --> 42:32.560] Grand jury may or may not call you in and the prosecutor may or may not call you, subpoena [42:32.560 --> 42:36.640] you to come to the witness stand on trial. [42:36.640 --> 42:45.000] But if you sue them civilly, like you turn this into a federal, for example, that title [42:45.000 --> 42:55.040] 42, US code 1983, that is to get state actors in trouble for violating your federally protected [42:55.040 --> 42:56.040] rights. [42:56.040 --> 43:01.240] And in that case, you're reporting crime and you're looking for damages because it's a [43:01.240 --> 43:02.240] civil case. [43:02.240 --> 43:06.840] It's like a civil shell that its elements are crime. [43:06.840 --> 43:12.600] So you're kind of hitting two birds with one stone if you do it that way. [43:12.600 --> 43:19.640] I'm not sure because you have to show damages and I'm not yet, have not yet figured out [43:19.640 --> 43:23.000] how to prove damages in those cases yet. [43:23.000 --> 43:28.680] Otherwise, I mean, I would be glad to go do that, but I'm not going to prove damages yet. [43:28.680 --> 43:32.280] Yeah, I would say just start small. [43:32.280 --> 43:38.480] You're not going to hurt anything by going ahead and filing criminal complaints and getting [43:38.480 --> 43:40.200] people held accountable for that. [43:40.200 --> 43:42.560] Is there anything else we have for the other side? [43:42.560 --> 43:43.560] No, no. [43:43.560 --> 43:46.560] I appreciate your input. [43:46.560 --> 43:47.560] Thank you so much. [43:47.560 --> 43:48.560] All right. [43:48.560 --> 43:49.560] Well, thanks for calling. [43:49.560 --> 43:50.560] All right. [43:50.560 --> 43:51.560] Now we're going to go to our sponsors. [43:51.560 --> 43:57.000] I see you, E.J. and we have a first time caller and we've got Chris in Colorado. [43:57.000 --> 43:58.000] We'll be right back. [43:58.000 --> 44:05.560] Through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition. [44:05.560 --> 44:10.320] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that. [44:10.320 --> 44:16.040] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [44:16.040 --> 44:22.320] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can [44:22.320 --> 44:24.600] provide the nutrients you need. [44:24.600 --> 44:29.680] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which [44:29.680 --> 44:30.680] we reject. [44:30.680 --> 44:35.800] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with [44:35.800 --> 44:38.640] Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [44:38.640 --> 44:45.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [44:45.000 --> 44:46.000] quality radio. [44:46.000 --> 44:50.560] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [44:50.560 --> 44:56.160] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [44:56.160 --> 44:57.160] increase your income. [44:57.160 --> 44:58.160] Order now. [44:58.160 --> 45:03.160] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:03.160 --> 45:10.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course [45:10.000 --> 45:13.920] that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [45:13.920 --> 45:17.760] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:17.760 --> 45:22.040] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:22.040 --> 45:26.760] Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. [45:26.760 --> 45:33.640] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. [45:33.640 --> 45:38.280] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the [45:38.280 --> 45:42.480] principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:42.480 --> 45:48.680] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:48.680 --> 45:51.200] pro se tactics, and much more. [45:51.200 --> 46:19.680] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ. [47:21.200 --> 47:30.120] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? [47:30.120 --> 47:35.300] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that [47:35.300 --> 47:36.640] can really help. [47:36.640 --> 47:41.080] The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available [47:41.080 --> 47:42.080] today. [47:42.080 --> 47:46.000] It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you [47:46.000 --> 47:49.100] to know God and to know the meaning of life. [47:49.100 --> 47:54.360] The free books are a three volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. [47:54.360 --> 47:58.640] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan [47:58.640 --> 48:03.560] of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church. [48:03.560 --> 48:08.560] To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian [48:08.560 --> 48:21.320] Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102, that's 888-551-0102, or visit [48:21.320 --> 48:37.920] us online at bfa.org. [48:37.920 --> 48:57.480] The [48:57.480 --> 49:02.040] back again and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to [49:02.040 --> 49:06.560] vanish too. So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your [49:06.560 --> 49:11.760] information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service [49:11.760 --> 49:15.680] announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine [49:15.680 --> 49:21.320] alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with Startpage. [49:21.320 --> 49:25.640] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers [49:25.640 --> 49:29.520] and find a third party there. He announces, I'm with the military and I'm [49:29.520 --> 49:33.160] sleeping here tonight. That shocking image of a third party in my parents' [49:33.160 --> 49:37.240] bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent. It protects us [49:37.240 --> 49:40.960] from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the [49:40.960 --> 49:45.840] days of our founding fathers. Third party, Third Amendment, get it? So if you answer [49:45.840 --> 49:49.480] a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust [49:49.480 --> 49:53.560] off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment. I'm Dr. [49:53.560 --> 49:59.000] Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [50:06.760 --> 50:11.440] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. They [50:11.440 --> 50:14.880] guarantee it a specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our [50:14.880 --> 50:18.680] liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an [50:18.680 --> 50:23.520] unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. Privacy is [50:23.520 --> 50:27.520] under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back [50:27.520 --> 50:31.960] again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to [50:31.960 --> 50:36.480] vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your [50:36.480 --> 50:41.640] information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service [50:41.640 --> 50:45.560] announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine [50:45.560 --> 50:52.760] alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. Imagine four [50:52.760 --> 50:56.840] eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray [50:56.840 --> 51:01.040] goggles. That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans [51:01.040 --> 51:04.960] freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. Fourth Amendment? Four eyes [51:04.960 --> 51:09.040] staring at you? Get it? Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth [51:09.040 --> 51:14.040] Amendment rights in the name of security. Case in point, TSA airport scanners that [51:14.040 --> 51:18.080] peer under your clothing. When government employees demand a peep at your privates [51:18.080 --> 51:22.160] without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells. [51:22.160 --> 51:26.240] Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use [51:26.240 --> 51:30.760] their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [51:30.760 --> 51:54.520] Find out more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [52:00.760 --> 52:10.920] Okay, we are back. Rule of Law Radio. Randy Kelton's. I'm Brett Fountain, and [52:10.920 --> 52:20.520] this is Friday, the 3rd of June, 2022. And I am seeing some indications that we had [52:20.520 --> 52:25.720] dead air this last segment. Not sure why. Looks like we had some weirdness going on [52:25.720 --> 52:30.880] with the caller board too. Don't know what's up with that. Hopefully you guys [52:30.880 --> 52:38.400] are hearing me. Call in 512-646-1984. We're going to go ahead and try once more [52:38.400 --> 52:50.120] to go to EJ in California. Hello, EJ. Hi, Brett. Wonderful. Glad to hear you this [52:50.120 --> 53:00.560] time. Yes, there was some dead air, but I hung on. I'm glad you did. I was just [53:00.560 --> 53:07.400] there telling all of my $20 words. Oh well. Okay, what's on your mind this [53:07.400 --> 53:17.960] evening? Okay, so still plugging in along with the case against the hospital and [53:17.960 --> 53:26.120] the status conference was coming up, the first hearing on Monday. And I missed the [53:26.120 --> 53:33.400] there's a statement that we're supposed to fill out, and I totally missed it. It's [53:33.400 --> 53:40.120] called a meet and confer statement. And I don't know if Texas has the meet and [53:40.120 --> 53:47.360] confer in a civil suit, but we were supposed to meet and confer 30 days [53:47.360 --> 53:55.080] prior to the hearing. Didn't do it because all the discoveries that they [53:55.080 --> 54:02.880] sent me, they send it to a wrong email. And also the, you know, the [54:02.880 --> 54:11.800] interrogatories that there were sent. The proof of service was, what was the word? [54:11.800 --> 54:18.320] The proof of service is wrong. Insufficient. Okay, yeah. Insufficient service [54:18.320 --> 54:27.000] of process. Insufficient service of process. I've already mailed them my, you [54:27.000 --> 54:31.080] know, statement saying that this is insufficient, as well as trying to get the [54:31.080 --> 54:38.400] police record. They sent it to a wrong address, you know, just- Police record? [54:38.400 --> 54:48.600] Yeah. How's the police involved? Well, they, the police came to the hospital and [54:48.600 --> 54:56.600] made a false report. And there were surveillance footage that captured [54:56.600 --> 55:03.600] what happened in the lobby, the era lobby. And I tried- I know, but I'm saying about the [55:03.600 --> 55:11.840] service of this meet and confer, how does that involve the police? Yeah, that is [55:11.840 --> 55:16.160] true. Well, it's just part of the records because the meet and confer is [55:16.160 --> 55:27.640] just meeting together to see what kind of discovery both parties will agree to [55:27.640 --> 55:39.280] do. It says right here, pursuant to rule 315, we would have to meet and confer [55:39.280 --> 55:49.320] regarding the following discovery. And it asks to have a tentative schedule of [55:49.320 --> 55:56.760] discovery. And I put parties have not been able to agree on a meet and confer [55:56.760 --> 56:06.480] date and time. Plaintiff letters attached and plaintiffs request continuing the [56:06.480 --> 56:10.400] case management conference. I just requested it because give me another [56:10.400 --> 56:18.600] day, 30 days, because it's mandatory. It says the party must, must- Yeah, there's [56:18.600 --> 56:25.120] nothing wrong with that. Okay. Yeah, when somebody does something [56:25.120 --> 56:30.680] sly and sneaky and sends it to the opposing party, serves it, I have to just [56:30.680 --> 56:35.040] imagine that they know what they're doing and they didn't want to go well. [56:35.040 --> 56:38.520] They didn't want me to have service, but they wanted it to look like they were [56:38.520 --> 56:45.400] serving something. And you know, I see that and whatever. Dirty trick. I will put [56:45.400 --> 56:51.720] in the judicial notice and just say, I did not get service. We are setting it up [56:51.720 --> 56:57.240] now. And that's just something to put it, just so there's something that got file [56:57.240 --> 57:00.720] stamped and that's in the record, shows good faith. You know, you didn't do [57:00.720 --> 57:07.400] anything wrong. You're not trying to hold them accountable, unless you are. You're [57:07.400 --> 57:11.640] trying to just move forward with the case and that just shows good faith. [57:11.640 --> 57:15.840] It puts a document in there that has a date on it and so forth. So it sounds [57:15.840 --> 57:21.480] like you're, yeah, right on track with all that. Okay, wonderful. I just [57:21.480 --> 57:27.480] submitted the meet and confer statement, even though it's late. So it isn't the [57:27.480 --> 57:34.720] record, so it's filed. Just saying that parties haven't been able to agree and [57:34.720 --> 57:40.600] just filed. Well, did you also clearly say that they served an incorrect [57:40.600 --> 57:47.400] destination or recipient address or something like that? Yeah, I attached my [57:47.400 --> 57:54.880] letters to the meet and confer statement, two letters from them. Okay. And you know, [57:54.880 --> 57:59.960] the judge appreciates if you don't demonstrate in those kinds of things, if [57:59.960 --> 58:05.160] you don't talk bad about the lawyers, if you don't say, why that's sneaky, rotten, [58:05.160 --> 58:13.240] no good, even though probably they are. You say, evidently opposing counsel was [58:13.240 --> 58:21.960] mistaken as to my address. You know, just put it out there like this and the judge [58:21.960 --> 58:33.080] will smirk. He knows exactly what happened. That sly dog. So I would, you know, I am [58:33.080 --> 58:41.720] going in person to the conference, the status conference, the first hearing. So I [58:41.720 --> 58:47.440] just wanted to give you a heads up. The clerks will lie because I called them and [58:47.440 --> 58:51.640] I said, hey, I want to come in person. They're like, you can't come in person. [58:51.640 --> 59:01.360] Everything is via, you know, what is it, via Zoom. And I'm like, he's lying to me. [59:01.360 --> 59:08.600] It's over the phone because I courted one day. Yeah. And I knocked on the door and [59:08.600 --> 59:13.560] she said, no, you have to give us five days notice. If you're going to be in [59:13.560 --> 59:21.200] person, I go. So then I knew, I'm like, oh, you know, that's good to know. And [59:21.200 --> 59:26.320] this week I called just to see what they would say to me. And he lied to me. He [59:26.320 --> 59:31.760] said, we don't hold in-person meetings. And I filed it. And I called him today. I [59:31.760 --> 59:36.280] said, did you get my notice? And he said, yes, we'll see you in person on Monday. [59:36.280 --> 59:45.680] They lie. So whatever they say, don't trust them. Do what you got to do. That's my [59:45.680 --> 59:55.240] deal. Yeah. Gosh, you know, the state court system, it's really, it's in disarray. [59:55.240 --> 01:00:01.840] I mean, just people just lying to you over the phone. You know, I reported him. [01:00:01.840 --> 01:00:07.840] I have a tape, but it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter, but it'll push. Well, [01:00:07.840 --> 01:00:12.880] you know, yeah, they are so prolific with their wrongdoing that if you have the [01:00:12.880 --> 01:00:17.160] bandwidth for it, you can hold them all accountable. But at some point they're [01:00:17.160 --> 01:00:23.520] so, they just come up with so many different ways to break the law and deny [01:00:23.520 --> 01:00:26.840] you and your rights that you just have to pick your battles. You have to decide [01:00:26.840 --> 01:00:32.400] which ones am I going to, you know, give up my time with my kids and give up the [01:00:32.400 --> 01:00:37.920] time. I need to go to the grocery store at some point here. And you have to draw [01:00:37.920 --> 01:00:42.320] the line and say, I'm going to hold this person accountable for that. And I'm [01:00:42.320 --> 01:00:48.160] just going to let this other issue right here, just let it go. Or maybe you get [01:00:48.160 --> 01:00:53.160] really good at being quick to bar grieve and quick to file a criminal complaint, [01:00:53.160 --> 01:00:57.560] but you don't pursue it after that. You have to draw the line for yourself on [01:00:58.120 --> 01:01:03.040] how much you're going to put into it. Because they are, they are prolific. They [01:01:03.040 --> 01:01:04.760] will keep you busy. [01:01:07.320 --> 01:01:14.040] Oh, yeah. It's just, it's nonstop. It really is. They know that you probably [01:01:14.040 --> 01:01:22.840] don't know the rules back to back. So they'll test you and see. And I put the [01:01:22.840 --> 01:01:28.560] notice in and called and spoke to the same, same guy, Enrique. And I do have [01:01:28.600 --> 01:01:36.240] the zoom link. So I'm going to post it. I'm going to be there in person. So [01:01:36.240 --> 01:01:42.640] hopefully some people will be able to. Yeah, Pacific 9 130. So I did. [01:01:42.640 --> 01:01:46.280] Yeah, great. Yeah, post the link and you'll have some court watchers to join [01:01:46.280 --> 01:01:46.880] in with you. [01:01:46.880 --> 01:01:54.000] Yeah, that would be great. And also, guess what, Brett? Remember, I had a [01:01:54.000 --> 01:02:00.200] traffic citation last year towards the end of the year. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Separate [01:02:00.200 --> 01:02:06.720] issue. Yes. Separate issue. Guess what? I get a letter in the mail from the DA [01:02:06.760 --> 01:02:11.360] saying that they're prosecuting the misdemeanor for not showing my ID [01:02:11.360 --> 01:02:18.880] refusal or something like that. So now I have another court. But there's no [01:02:18.880 --> 01:02:25.360] probable cause because those two tickets, like making a right that that's just [01:02:25.360 --> 01:02:29.160] like one poof. So how could they even I guess they're like, well, we can get her [01:02:29.160 --> 01:02:32.920] on this. So let's put her on the, you know, [01:02:33.680 --> 01:02:37.280] Okay, so they had multiple charges on there and they dropped some of them, but [01:02:37.280 --> 01:02:43.000] they kept one. Is that what I'm hearing? Okay. Well, go down there. If you didn't [01:02:43.000 --> 01:02:47.240] already go get a certified copy, go talk to the court clerk and say, Hey, I'd [01:02:47.240 --> 01:02:54.680] like to inspect the record. Inspecting is free. And it's right now. So they're [01:02:54.680 --> 01:02:57.680] not going to wait two weeks or whatever is their time frame. They're just going [01:02:57.680 --> 01:03:01.440] to pull out the folder. You might have to wait a minute while they go reach and [01:03:01.440 --> 01:03:08.000] get it. But you're not really waiting weeks, even days. You'll just you're [01:03:08.000 --> 01:03:12.440] standing at the counter. I'm here now. I want to inspect it. So they will go and [01:03:12.960 --> 01:03:16.360] pull it for you and flop it on the counter. You can flip through it. You [01:03:16.360 --> 01:03:21.600] take pictures with your phone if you want. And then while you're standing [01:03:21.600 --> 01:03:25.960] there looking at it is the time to ask for a copy. You want to take a copy home. [01:03:25.960 --> 01:03:31.600] They are expecting kind of a different path. They're expecting you to email [01:03:31.600 --> 01:03:37.520] them or write to them. And then they're going to sit on it for a couple of weeks [01:03:37.520 --> 01:03:41.320] and do nothing. Well, now they have no excuse because you're standing there in [01:03:41.320 --> 01:03:45.480] front of them and the documents are right here. So they can't tell you it's [01:03:45.480 --> 01:03:50.520] going to take two weeks for me to get to the Xerox machine in back. See? [01:03:50.520 --> 01:03:56.280] Oh, yeah. I can certify copy just like that. That's the problem because I've done that. [01:03:56.280 --> 01:04:02.240] But to certify copy, they charge you $45, which is a lot of money. $45. [01:04:02.240 --> 01:04:10.480] $45 here. Yeah. That's a California thing. That's a California thing. Yeah. [01:04:10.480 --> 01:04:15.160] I hate to ask how much it costs for you to get a Coca-Cola. [01:04:15.160 --> 01:04:22.680] Because if I put an Informa Popper sheet in there, that means that I already gave them [01:04:22.680 --> 01:04:30.080] jurisdiction. So I can't do that for this. That's what I heard. Like if I file that I'm [01:04:30.080 --> 01:04:39.040] an Informa Popper and I put it in the case file, that means automatically that I gave [01:04:39.040 --> 01:04:45.960] them my jurisdiction. Because I'm not sure about that. [01:04:45.960 --> 01:04:53.200] Really? I'm not sure. That would be... They're kind of two separate issues there. One is, [01:04:53.200 --> 01:04:58.080] are you going to be able to pay for the court costs? And one is, does this court even have [01:04:58.080 --> 01:05:03.200] jurisdiction to preside over this matter at all? Has this matter been properly brought [01:05:03.200 --> 01:05:10.600] to the court? Have I been brought into, either via in Persom, in Rim, somehow they have to [01:05:10.600 --> 01:05:15.720] say that there's a nexus and a reason for them to hear this case. But it's you who's [01:05:15.720 --> 01:05:20.520] responsible to stand and answer. So I think it's two separate issues. I mean, if you saw [01:05:20.520 --> 01:05:26.120] something in your local rules, go by that. But I think that's going to be separate. We [01:05:26.120 --> 01:05:31.120] will be right. You're going to be right. You're going to be right. You're going to be right. [01:05:31.120 --> 01:05:35.960] It's going to be separate. We will be right back. [01:05:35.960 --> 01:05:40.680] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:05:40.680 --> 01:05:45.840] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won [01:05:45.840 --> 01:05:50.960] six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll get step by [01:05:50.960 --> 01:05:55.600] step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights [01:05:55.600 --> 01:06:01.120] statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters [01:06:01.120 --> 01:06:05.320] and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the [01:06:05.320 --> 01:06:11.040] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mears proven method [01:06:11.040 --> 01:06:16.560] is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. [01:06:16.560 --> 01:06:22.320] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner [01:06:22.320 --> 01:06:32.880] or email michaelmears.yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com [01:06:32.880 --> 01:06:38.360] to learn how to stop debt collectors now. I love logos. Without the shows on this network, [01:06:38.360 --> 01:06:42.320] I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's [01:06:42.320 --> 01:06:47.560] no going back. I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help [01:06:47.560 --> 01:06:51.120] keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit [01:06:51.120 --> 01:06:56.120] of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [01:06:56.120 --> 01:07:01.720] How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you [01:07:01.720 --> 01:07:06.080] can help logos. When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, the first thing you do is [01:07:06.080 --> 01:07:13.280] clear your cookies. Now, go to logosradio.network.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [01:07:13.280 --> 01:07:19.200] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. [01:07:19.200 --> 01:07:24.320] Do I pay extra? No. Do I have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon [01:07:24.320 --> 01:07:30.120] Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This [01:07:30.120 --> 01:07:53.480] is perfect. Thank you so much. We are welcome. Happy Holidays, Logos. This is the Logos Radio [01:07:53.480 --> 01:08:08.480] Show. Okay. We are back. This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountain [01:08:08.480 --> 01:08:16.480] and this is the 3rd of June, 2022. Right now we're talking with EJ in California. So let's [01:08:16.480 --> 01:08:22.720] see EJ. There you go. When we went out to the sponsors, you were just talking about [01:08:22.720 --> 01:08:33.000] the possibility that if you were to say that you have, if you're informal paupers, then [01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:39.840] you felt like maybe that was going to automatically give them jurisdiction to hear the matter. [01:08:39.840 --> 01:08:44.720] And I'm not sure about that. You might look into that because I think it will be separate. [01:08:44.720 --> 01:08:54.720] A second question regarding the failure, like something like resist, not resisting, but [01:08:54.720 --> 01:09:03.880] not giving the license to the peace officer. I was going to mail a informal discovery request [01:09:03.880 --> 01:09:11.240] to the DA in California. They have an informal discovery and there's some samples online. [01:09:11.240 --> 01:09:20.880] And the first question is, can you send me the back copy of the ticket? And I don't understand [01:09:20.880 --> 01:09:26.800] that. I don't understand that. Why would someone ask for a back copy of the ticket? [01:09:26.800 --> 01:09:37.560] Yeah, that doesn't make sense to me either. But it's everywhere in Sacramento. So I'm [01:09:37.560 --> 01:09:46.640] going to use the informal discovery request. Maybe this is just traffic, but it was traffic, [01:09:46.640 --> 01:09:52.720] but now it's a misdemeanor. I got to make sure that, see right here, a copy of the reverse [01:09:52.720 --> 01:10:03.440] of the citing officer's copy of the above reference notice to appear and a copy of records [01:10:03.440 --> 01:10:13.680] regarding them. So I'm just asking, can I, for the informal discovery request, I think [01:10:13.680 --> 01:10:18.760] this is just for traffic though. I didn't read the rules. I may just have to do the [01:10:18.760 --> 01:10:27.520] discovery request. Instead of just doing the discovery request, I need to put in a motion [01:10:27.520 --> 01:10:37.560] to dismiss, and then improper venue, because they're not a court of record. And also- [01:10:37.560 --> 01:10:41.400] Oh yeah. You don't have those in there already. Start with the jurisdiction, the challenge [01:10:41.400 --> 01:10:44.840] jurisdiction. That should always be the first thing you file. [01:10:44.840 --> 01:10:48.920] Okay. Okay. So- [01:10:48.920 --> 01:10:55.160] I follow that up with an objection to an improper venue. I follow that up right at the same [01:10:55.160 --> 01:11:01.040] time with the jurisdiction and a motion to dismiss based on that. So- [01:11:01.040 --> 01:11:06.720] All three together. Venue is dependent on, yes. Venue is completely [01:11:06.720 --> 01:11:12.540] dependent on jurisdiction. So if they don't have jurisdiction, there's no proper venue. [01:11:12.540 --> 01:11:16.720] Every venue is improper. I see. [01:11:16.720 --> 01:11:23.800] So I put those three together. If you have improper venue or if you have a lack of jurisdiction, [01:11:23.800 --> 01:11:27.960] those rules will want either of those issues to be filed first. Well, in this case, you've [01:11:27.960 --> 01:11:33.640] got both issues. So file them all at the same time. And a motion to ask the court to do [01:11:33.640 --> 01:11:36.880] something about it. Dismiss. [01:11:36.880 --> 01:11:48.320] Okay. Great. For the arraignment date, for the motions to be heard, the date of the arraignment. [01:11:48.320 --> 01:11:58.200] And there was a posting of by someone in Florida and it was a really good document. I don't [01:11:58.200 --> 01:12:09.360] know if you read it, but it was regarding a notice for judicial- for the judicial- it's [01:12:09.360 --> 01:12:20.720] not a complaint, but just to notice to the judges to make sure that they recognize our [01:12:20.720 --> 01:12:27.120] constitutional rights and that it shouldn't be- yeah, they shouldn't be violating. So [01:12:27.120 --> 01:12:34.120] that I'm going to be filing that as well. Do I have it here? Yeah, someone from Florida [01:12:34.120 --> 01:12:37.520] did it and he won his case in Florida. [01:12:37.520 --> 01:12:45.080] Yeah. Interesting. Well, is there anything else that's on your mind for this evening? [01:12:45.080 --> 01:12:52.640] Okay. For back to the civil case, I have a question- another question. So I have a motion [01:12:52.640 --> 01:13:00.680] to stay. Should I bring a motion to stay with me in person and have them- have them file [01:13:00.680 --> 01:13:04.880] it while I'm there or should I just file it prior to going? [01:13:04.880 --> 01:13:15.240] That's a good question. So some kinds of motions will be mentioned in the rules as needing [01:13:15.240 --> 01:13:21.560] to have to give the other party a certain number of days notice. So you might take a [01:13:21.560 --> 01:13:30.760] look and see if that's it. Probably not because a motion to stay is you're trying to put a [01:13:30.760 --> 01:13:37.560] pause on everything here, pending whatever reasoning that you have in place. So it's [01:13:37.560 --> 01:13:41.640] probably not going to be a problem, but you want to take a look at your local rules and [01:13:41.640 --> 01:13:42.640] see. [01:13:42.640 --> 01:13:53.120] Let's see. Yeah, for that, there aren't any rules like you need to wait for the day. So [01:13:53.120 --> 01:13:59.200] I can do it right away. I'm just thinking should I do it before or on that- on the day [01:13:59.200 --> 01:14:05.880] of the hearing? I think it's better just to file it before, I believe, but I'll just [01:14:05.880 --> 01:14:06.880] have a look. [01:14:06.880 --> 01:14:11.720] Yeah, if you don't have any pressing, like really strategic reason that you are not filing [01:14:11.720 --> 01:14:18.440] something, go ahead and file it. Now that gives, you know, it's a good faith move. You've [01:14:18.440 --> 01:14:23.840] got the- giving the other side plenty of opportunity to oppose the motion if they have some reason [01:14:23.840 --> 01:14:30.080] to. You know, they can say, no, if you stay that, then that'll harm my client's right [01:14:30.080 --> 01:14:38.280] to whatever, something else, and you have to take that into account. So by giving them [01:14:38.280 --> 01:14:43.760] a document that's a surprise, that's generally frowned upon. They can't really beat you up [01:14:43.760 --> 01:14:52.280] too much about it, your pro se, but they appreciate when there is notice given. There's advance, [01:14:52.280 --> 01:14:58.600] you know, however many days in advance, that's generally seen as a good thing. [01:14:58.600 --> 01:15:08.120] I see. Okay. And one more thing before we go. I looked at the Registrative Actions [01:15:08.120 --> 01:15:19.520] online and the parties must file a- it's like a statement of the status, what's going on, [01:15:19.520 --> 01:15:27.240] and they didn't send me a copy at all of that, and they put jury trial fees attached. You [01:15:27.240 --> 01:15:34.600] can see like the jury, that they want to move forward to a jury trial. When they were late [01:15:34.600 --> 01:15:42.120] in responding with an answer, it was past the 30 days, and I'm thinking, you know, [01:15:42.120 --> 01:15:51.240] are you- is the case winnable just by a technicality like that? I don't know. [01:15:51.240 --> 01:16:02.040] I don't know either. Yeah, sorry. I got no experience to draw on to answer that question. [01:16:02.040 --> 01:16:10.440] Okay. It's just putting it out there, but I think that putting the jury trial fees, [01:16:10.440 --> 01:16:18.560] they're moving towards going to a jury trial, of course. But how can they just go, you know, [01:16:18.560 --> 01:16:24.200] marching in without any evidence? No discovery has- [01:16:24.200 --> 01:16:31.400] When some lawyer does something that I, in my debt, don't think is right, I am most likely [01:16:31.400 --> 01:16:39.000] going to be able to find pretty easily why. They will say on their pursuit to rule this [01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:42.680] or that, you go look and that rule doesn't exactly say that. Or they'll put some case [01:16:42.680 --> 01:16:48.880] law in there that appears to bolster their position. And when you go read the case, it's [01:16:48.880 --> 01:16:57.920] not talking about that. Or even in some cases, it'll say those phrases, but it's- that's [01:16:57.920 --> 01:17:02.600] not the holding of the case. So the whole gist of it is saying the opposite of what [01:17:02.600 --> 01:17:07.280] they said. And you just, you can probably beat them up if you go and read what they're [01:17:07.280 --> 01:17:12.600] saying because your gut will tell you, hey, that's not right. I wouldn't do that to them. [01:17:12.600 --> 01:17:18.040] They're doing this to me. This is not right. Something's not okay here. And in those cases, [01:17:18.040 --> 01:17:25.880] you can probably find not only how to rip their document to shreds, but also which rule [01:17:25.880 --> 01:17:31.280] to bargain them about. They violated some rule of ethics and you can call them on that. [01:17:31.280 --> 01:17:37.680] Wow. Okay. I think that's it. Thank you so much. [01:17:37.680 --> 01:17:44.840] Okay. Yeah. Well, thank you for calling, EJ. Good talking with you. Okay. So then next [01:17:44.840 --> 01:17:52.240] we have a first time caller that has hung on through the data error that we had apparently. [01:17:52.240 --> 01:18:01.720] And this is in the 650 area code. If you can hear me, give a first name and a state. [01:18:01.720 --> 01:18:08.080] My name is Wayne Bryce and although this is a California number, I live in the great state [01:18:08.080 --> 01:18:14.200] of Texas. Okay. Wayne in Texas. We're just about to go [01:18:14.200 --> 01:18:22.880] to our sponsors here for a break, but we'll come back on the other side and we will address [01:18:22.880 --> 01:18:28.440] your issues. And we do have another spot on the caller board. And if you want to call [01:18:28.440 --> 01:18:40.160] in, it is 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. Sorry, soft drink lovers. Even diet drinks [01:18:40.160 --> 01:18:45.480] can make you fat. A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people [01:18:45.480 --> 01:18:49.800] who avoid the stuff. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop [01:18:49.800 --> 01:18:55.480] on supposedly skinny sodas. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data [01:18:55.480 --> 01:19:00.400] about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find [01:19:00.400 --> 01:19:05.760] your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights, say no to surveillance [01:19:05.760 --> 01:19:11.460] and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service [01:19:11.460 --> 01:19:16.880] announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, [01:19:16.880 --> 01:19:23.840] Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage. Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and [01:19:23.840 --> 01:19:29.640] help you lose weight, right? Wrong. Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet [01:19:29.640 --> 01:19:34.760] soda drinkers for nearly a decade. They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded [01:19:34.760 --> 01:19:40.240] people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all. The study's authors say artificial [01:19:40.240 --> 01:19:44.480] sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to [01:19:44.480 --> 01:19:49.460] squelch it. Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in [01:19:49.460 --> 01:19:54.840] a larger overall calorie intake. So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight and [01:19:54.840 --> 01:19:59.520] if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead. [01:19:59.520 --> 01:20:06.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:20:06.320 --> 01:20:11.680] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. [01:20:11.680 --> 01:20:17.120] The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded [01:20:17.120 --> 01:20:21.040] it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their [01:20:21.040 --> 01:20:25.560] lives and thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:20:25.560 --> 01:20:28.720] I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force [01:20:28.720 --> 01:20:33.720] pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to [01:20:33.720 --> 01:20:40.240] RememberBuilding7.org today. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic [01:20:40.240 --> 01:20:43.960] seminar. In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society and if we, the people, [01:20:43.960 --> 01:20:47.400] are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our [01:20:47.400 --> 01:20:51.360] own rights. Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the [01:20:51.360 --> 01:20:54.760] right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process [01:20:54.760 --> 01:20:59.000] of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce [01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:03.280] and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction [01:21:03.280 --> 01:21:06.720] with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [01:21:06.720 --> 01:21:10.760] that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [01:21:10.760 --> 01:21:15.040] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [01:21:15.040 --> 01:21:18.360] ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The [01:21:18.360 --> 01:21:22.760] Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 [01:21:22.760 --> 01:21:26.560] seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how [01:21:26.560 --> 01:21:30.440] to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order [01:21:30.440 --> 01:21:54.120] your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:22:00.440 --> 01:22:10.480] Okay, we are back. This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountain and [01:22:10.480 --> 01:22:16.960] we are talking with Wayne in Texas. Wayne, I'm glad you held on. I don't know what happened [01:22:16.960 --> 01:22:23.120] during that segment, but I'm glad you held on and we're able to talk with you now. What's [01:22:23.120 --> 01:22:24.120] on your mind? [01:22:24.120 --> 01:22:29.520] So, Brett, thanks for taking my call. I've got a confession to make. I'm a first time [01:22:29.520 --> 01:22:31.600] caller for the second time. [01:22:31.600 --> 01:22:32.600] Okay. [01:22:32.600 --> 01:22:40.600] Okay. So, thanks for taking the call. So, I had called, I want to say the last week or [01:22:40.600 --> 01:22:47.040] the week before and you guys had some technical difficulties and I was on maybe an hour with [01:22:47.040 --> 01:22:52.800] you guys until you guys got the lines up. But anyhow, I'm in- [01:22:52.800 --> 01:22:56.880] Did you just call from a different number? Because we didn't get that. [01:22:56.880 --> 01:23:04.000] Well, the last two digits for my wife's phone, everything is the same except the last two [01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:05.000] digits. [01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:09.600] Okay. Once it goes into the system, usually it pops up with a name next time and if it [01:23:09.600 --> 01:23:16.480] doesn't, then it says some wireless caller or something and then we know that that's [01:23:16.480 --> 01:23:21.800] a first time caller. So, yeah, what's on your mind? [01:23:21.800 --> 01:23:25.800] I blame my wife for that, but I know that won't fly because everything is my fault. [01:23:25.800 --> 01:23:27.720] So, I'll just move on. [01:23:27.720 --> 01:23:31.600] Yeah, don't even try. [01:23:31.600 --> 01:23:47.480] So, when it comes to filing suit against the VA, under common law, can I sue a corporation [01:23:47.480 --> 01:23:54.320] in a common law court? Is that even possible? Do I have to go under the- [01:23:54.320 --> 01:23:58.560] I can't see any way that that makes sense because a fictional entity didn't do anything [01:23:58.560 --> 01:23:59.560] to you. [01:23:59.560 --> 01:24:00.560] That's right. [01:24:00.560 --> 01:24:05.680] It was some man or woman who did something and maybe they did it with the excuse of, [01:24:05.680 --> 01:24:10.680] well, that's what my boss wanted me to do, but actually no acronym did anything to you. [01:24:10.680 --> 01:24:13.320] It's just a pile of paper. [01:24:13.320 --> 01:24:24.680] Because I know when you- because they say, well, you can file a claim under Title VII [01:24:24.680 --> 01:24:34.960] of the- what is it? Act of 19 square. Anyhow, I can't remember the exact act right now, [01:24:34.960 --> 01:24:44.880] but anyhow, if I file an EEO claim, I have to file against a person who won't be there. [01:24:44.880 --> 01:24:51.320] They'll put whoever the secretary of the VA is, and that's who the lawsuit is. [01:24:51.320 --> 01:24:52.320] Okay. [01:24:52.320 --> 01:24:57.640] And that doesn't sound like something I can win just because I'm not familiar with all [01:24:57.640 --> 01:24:58.640] that world. [01:24:58.640 --> 01:24:59.640] Well- [01:24:59.640 --> 01:25:06.880] So, you're talking about not trying to do common law anymore. You're doing it within [01:25:06.880 --> 01:25:09.640] their administrative system, right? You're talking about- [01:25:09.640 --> 01:25:10.640] I don't want to be there. [01:25:10.640 --> 01:25:11.640] EEO complaint? [01:25:11.640 --> 01:25:16.960] Yeah. I don't think that's a good idea. I think it's a sucker's bet. I think it's a- [01:25:16.960 --> 01:25:24.120] Well, I think it is. Once you sue in their world, they drag it out for one thing and [01:25:24.120 --> 01:25:27.880] you don't- it can be appealed forever. [01:25:27.880 --> 01:25:28.880] Right. [01:25:28.880 --> 01:25:38.320] If it's a common law court, it's not appealable. They can't appeal it. It's what's done. When [01:25:38.320 --> 01:25:45.360] those are drawn, the decision's made, the court is spoken. Right? [01:25:45.360 --> 01:25:51.440] If the jury- if you have a bench trial or a jury trial, there's a little bit of difference [01:25:51.440 --> 01:25:53.160] there with- [01:25:53.160 --> 01:25:54.160] Jury trial. [01:25:54.160 --> 01:26:00.640] It can be appealed. Yeah. So, if you do- if you get the jury to say, here's the way it [01:26:00.640 --> 01:26:06.640] is, then yeah, that part's done. The only thing that you could really challenge at that [01:26:06.640 --> 01:26:12.800] point would be, was there some kind of judicial error? I don't know, maybe in allowing evidence [01:26:12.800 --> 01:26:21.080] that should have been inadmissible or something that didn't have to do with the findings of [01:26:21.080 --> 01:26:22.080] the jury. [01:26:22.080 --> 01:26:28.960] So, I have clear negligence. I mean, it's really, really easy. There was the agreement [01:26:28.960 --> 01:26:33.840] that, you know, the whole, hey, will you stick this thing up your nose if we don't give you [01:26:33.840 --> 01:26:39.000] the vaccine? I said, sure. You know, first I said, okay, fine. And then it like burned [01:26:39.000 --> 01:26:45.120] like crazy. I'm like, now wait a minute, there's something in this. I think our whole agreement [01:26:45.120 --> 01:26:50.680] has just fallen apart here because I wasn't advised to this. I didn't get full disclosure. [01:26:50.680 --> 01:26:59.320] So, the decision is null and void. And so, from the standpoint of- I thought it was a [01:26:59.320 --> 01:27:03.560] trap. That's what I thought. I thought I can't- because they get this thing and once I try [01:27:03.560 --> 01:27:15.800] it in their court, then you can't bring up the pattern of facts a second time in the [01:27:15.800 --> 01:27:20.600] case where I know I could have them in the common law court. Does that make sense? [01:27:20.600 --> 01:27:26.960] Yeah, it does make sense. I don't know how to confirm or deny that for you. That might [01:27:26.960 --> 01:27:34.720] be a question better suited for Randy. I'm sorry he's not with us this evening. But I [01:27:34.720 --> 01:27:41.240] don't have- I couldn't say for sure. I mean, what you're saying makes sense and I bet you're [01:27:41.240 --> 01:27:45.200] right. I just- I can't say so with authority. [01:27:45.200 --> 01:27:51.800] So, the thing is, if I jump out there, because you have a set amount of time before you can [01:27:51.800 --> 01:27:58.360] file a claim in that kind of court. And I think I'm going to be technicality deaf. I [01:27:58.360 --> 01:28:02.440] think they got their little rules and their little statutes that I don't know about and [01:28:02.440 --> 01:28:07.320] they'll throw the statute out that doesn't make any sense. But some judge somewhere agreed [01:28:07.320 --> 01:28:16.800] that this is the facts. So, it's just a sucker's- and a waste of time. So, it sounds to me after [01:28:16.800 --> 01:28:20.280] talking to you and I kind of- my gut's kind of telling me this and usually when I don't [01:28:20.280 --> 01:28:27.760] listen to my gut, I pay with it dearly. So, yeah. So, my gut's telling me this is a trap [01:28:27.760 --> 01:28:32.640] and I should just go with common law because to me, I mean, the facts seem pretty darn [01:28:32.640 --> 01:28:38.440] well slam dunk. I mean, there was injury and I had some weird- I got a sunburn inside in [01:28:38.440 --> 01:28:41.640] the shade one day at work. Now, how does that- [01:28:41.640 --> 01:28:44.640] Oh, wow. Yeah, I remember you mentioning that now. [01:28:44.640 --> 01:28:49.400] Yeah. I got the pictures. I took the pictures. I got a guy in the room that witnessed me [01:28:49.400 --> 01:28:54.640] come to work with no sunburn, sitting right next to me. He's near the window. I'm not. [01:28:54.640 --> 01:28:58.760] And that's like, I feel like I'm getting cooked. Of course, we have- maybe I'm sensitive to [01:28:58.760 --> 01:29:06.760] light wave radiation. They do have cell tower equipment, a floor and a half up from my head, [01:29:06.760 --> 01:29:15.480] but no one else in the room was turning color. So, only I was red. So, something changed [01:29:15.480 --> 01:29:22.720] my system. Something made that happen. And the only thing that's in close proximity to [01:29:22.720 --> 01:29:28.400] that was the swab and the mask. That's it. And I didn't receive full disclosure on either [01:29:28.400 --> 01:29:29.400] one of those things. [01:29:29.400 --> 01:29:30.400] Yeah, man. [01:29:30.400 --> 01:29:37.400] So, I think even a rookie like me might be able to take this one on. [01:29:37.400 --> 01:29:47.440] I bet so. Sometimes it doesn't take a lot. Just your tenacity. You know you're right [01:29:47.440 --> 01:29:54.280] and you're going to see it through. Sometimes that's enough to carry you through the difficulties [01:29:54.280 --> 01:29:58.560] of finding what you need to find along the way. [01:29:58.560 --> 01:30:03.840] Yeah, I know last time I asked for case law regarding this, but if this is going- do I [01:30:03.840 --> 01:30:07.680] need a bunch of case law for this, you think? [01:30:07.680 --> 01:30:16.440] No. I would try to find one, but if you don't have a whole lot, that's fine. Usually when [01:30:16.440 --> 01:30:23.280] lawyers write their pleadings, they'll make a statement and then put a legal authority [01:30:23.280 --> 01:30:30.920] behind it. If they're good. I say usually. A lot of times they just say just spurt and [01:30:30.920 --> 01:30:35.240] whatever they feel like out of their mouth. But if they're doing right, then they'll make [01:30:35.240 --> 01:30:38.680] a statement and they'll put the legal authority behind it. They don't necessarily put a bunch [01:30:38.680 --> 01:30:41.080] of them. It's pretty rare. [01:30:41.080 --> 01:30:45.880] So, I need one for negligence and one for full disclosure. [01:30:45.880 --> 01:30:51.440] Yeah, you want to find one. If you find two that are really on point, then good. Mention [01:30:51.440 --> 01:30:59.800] both of them. But what's more important than quantity is that they're on point. [01:30:59.800 --> 01:31:00.800] Right. [01:31:00.800 --> 01:31:01.800] So, yeah. [01:31:01.800 --> 01:31:09.840] Got it. I got it. Okay. Thanks, Randy. I mean, Brett, sorry about that. [01:31:09.840 --> 01:31:18.600] Yeah, you bet. Thanks for calling. Okay. So, our next caller is also a first time caller. [01:31:18.600 --> 01:31:23.640] Well, that wasn't a first time caller apparently. But Chris, I see you there. We'll get to you [01:31:23.640 --> 01:31:34.560] right after this 954 caller. If you're from 954, give us a first name and a state. Hello, [01:31:34.560 --> 01:31:35.560] 954. [01:31:35.560 --> 01:31:39.680] Yes. Hi. Can you hear me? [01:31:39.680 --> 01:31:45.760] Yes. Give us a first name and a state. [01:31:45.760 --> 01:31:48.880] Jason and Florida. [01:31:48.880 --> 01:31:54.360] All right, Jason. Well, thank you for calling in. This is your first time? [01:31:54.360 --> 01:31:56.960] Yes, it is. [01:31:56.960 --> 01:32:01.560] Well, we're glad you called. And what's on your mind this evening? [01:32:01.560 --> 01:32:13.040] Sure. So, I have been dealing with a probate case for almost four years now. The case has [01:32:13.040 --> 01:32:19.000] been ongoing. They're finally trying to close it after over $150,000 worth of legal fees. [01:32:19.000 --> 01:32:20.000] Oh, my goodness. [01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:27.920] Yeah, cheers. So, yeah. Okay. So, we're just about to go to our sponsors. Just hold on. [01:32:27.920 --> 01:32:32.160] Hold that thought. We're going to get the sponsors and we'll continue on the other side. [01:32:32.160 --> 01:32:34.760] All right? Be right back. [01:32:34.760 --> 01:32:40.840] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [01:32:40.840 --> 01:32:45.560] of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we [01:32:45.560 --> 01:32:51.640] changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment [01:32:51.640 --> 01:32:56.800] is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and [01:32:56.800 --> 01:33:03.480] mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests [01:33:03.480 --> 01:33:08.440] to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Young [01:33:08.440 --> 01:33:14.840] Jevity so much. We became a marketing distributor, along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many [01:33:14.840 --> 01:33:21.720] others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [01:33:21.720 --> 01:33:27.240] quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:33:27.240 --> 01:33:32.840] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [01:33:32.840 --> 01:33:39.800] increase your income. Order now. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:33:39.800 --> 01:33:46.680] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course [01:33:46.680 --> 01:33:53.080] that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your [01:33:53.080 --> 01:33:58.680] lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:33:58.680 --> 01:34:05.080] Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created [01:34:05.080 --> 01:34:11.000] by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in [01:34:11.000 --> 01:34:16.520] a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices [01:34:16.520 --> 01:34:22.200] that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, [01:34:22.200 --> 01:34:30.600] tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com [01:34:30.600 --> 01:34:54.440] and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:34:54.440 --> 01:35:00.840] Okay, we are back. This is the Rule of Law Radio, Randy Kelty. I'm Brett Fountain, [01:35:00.840 --> 01:35:08.520] and we are talking with Jason in Florida. All right, Jason, what's up? [01:35:08.520 --> 01:35:16.280] So, my case, you know, it's pretty complicated and convoluted, so I'll try to get to the point [01:35:16.280 --> 01:35:25.160] of where I'm at now. There was a lot of fraud going on in my case, and I have been, [01:35:27.240 --> 01:35:33.640] over the past two years, filing documents of affidavits, filing documents saying that I [01:35:33.640 --> 01:35:40.600] fired the PR, because basically, I'm the sole heir, sole beneficiary, and the sole [01:35:40.600 --> 01:35:47.240] principal... Wait, you fired the what? The personal representative, the executive of the estate. [01:35:48.120 --> 01:35:55.480] Okay. Well, I've tried to on multiple occasions, and the attorney who represents the PR, [01:35:55.480 --> 01:36:03.240] the personal representative, he keeps suppressing my documents and keeps pushing forward. Anyways, [01:36:03.240 --> 01:36:11.720] long story short... Have you bar-grieved this attorney? Yes. So, I haven't bar-grieved him yet, [01:36:11.720 --> 01:36:17.960] but I did bar-grieve his former associate, which actually represents my ex, who had a claim for [01:36:17.960 --> 01:36:24.920] child support. Long story short, she used child support to try to go after my inheritance, [01:36:25.480 --> 01:36:31.640] and there was tons of fraud and all kinds of crazy stuff. Well, they recently tried to get [01:36:31.640 --> 01:36:37.800] the same judgment that they received in the probate court for a settlement for [01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:44.120] X amount of dollars of child support. They then, as I was trying to sell the condo that I inherited, [01:36:45.240 --> 01:36:50.680] sent the title company, a cease and desist, saying that I still owed an additional $98,000, [01:36:52.280 --> 01:36:56.920] and that that $98,000 need to be paid within the equity of the property when it was sold. [01:36:56.920 --> 01:37:01.240] However... The attorney says this, or a judge signed an order? [01:37:02.520 --> 01:37:09.400] No, the attorney goes to my federal agency last minute, like the day that we're about to close, [01:37:10.040 --> 01:37:16.440] saying, oh, there's these liens out there for child support for $98,000, but they had already [01:37:16.440 --> 01:37:22.040] received a judgment on settlement in the probate court. So, they tried to double dip. So, [01:37:22.040 --> 01:37:30.520] I did the criminal complaint against my ex-attorney. I then did an administrative [01:37:30.520 --> 01:37:35.160] process on the child support court. The child support court is actually in the process of [01:37:35.160 --> 01:37:39.480] bowing out because I did the whole proof of claim, and they failed to respond, and I [01:37:40.040 --> 01:37:46.680] basically defaulted them. And I'm taking them to court for declaratory judgment on that this week, [01:37:46.680 --> 01:37:52.680] but I'm also going to be filing a breach of fiduciary duty and other claims against the [01:37:52.680 --> 01:37:56.520] personal representative because they've all been kind of working in a civil conspiracy about all [01:37:56.520 --> 01:38:06.280] this. And now I'm about to hammer them all, but I want to try to get it out of Broward County. [01:38:06.280 --> 01:38:11.640] South Florida, Broward County is a very, very corrupt county. I want to be able to try to [01:38:11.640 --> 01:38:17.080] I want to be able to try to move it out of Broward County and perhaps get an injunction or something [01:38:17.080 --> 01:38:22.440] to stop them from closing the probate because there's all these alleged claims, but none of [01:38:22.440 --> 01:38:27.080] them have been proven, and I've got them dead to rights, which is why I'm going to file the breach [01:38:27.080 --> 01:38:32.760] of fiduciary duty to stop the probate. But I want to try to get it out of the county. How do I do that? [01:38:32.760 --> 01:38:42.520] Well, that's a good question. I think you mentioned earlier when you were talking about [01:38:42.520 --> 01:38:47.320] getting it out of Broward County, I recall seeing we've talked about this on telegram. [01:38:47.960 --> 01:38:56.440] And I think you were talking about you were going to name some state official that was outside the [01:38:56.440 --> 01:39:03.000] county, and that sounds like a perfect way to do it. You find another defendant that's not in Broward [01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:10.440] County, and now you've got you need to go to the next higher level, diversity. Okay. Yes, because [01:39:11.160 --> 01:39:17.960] they're taking the child support claims, which my ex had already turned it over to the Department [01:39:17.960 --> 01:39:25.160] of Revenue to collect on that claim. They were never able to. Then she did some funky [01:39:25.160 --> 01:39:30.760] judgment where I wasn't even served or anything, got a certain amount of money to come out of [01:39:30.760 --> 01:39:37.720] child support, and then they applied it to probate. A bunch of stuff. But I think since [01:39:37.720 --> 01:39:42.440] he's already sold the debt or sold my children basically to the state saying, hey, you know, [01:39:42.440 --> 01:39:50.920] collect his debt, isn't it... I recollect seeing it or reading it somewhere where once [01:39:50.920 --> 01:40:01.080] a person goes to the state and asks the state for their child support recovery services or [01:40:02.280 --> 01:40:08.280] enforcement services, isn't that debt sold? Or how can she come back and try to get it again? [01:40:09.400 --> 01:40:12.760] Yeah, I don't see any legitimacy to collecting the same debt twice. [01:40:14.760 --> 01:40:15.240] Exactly. [01:40:16.040 --> 01:40:20.680] Just the very fact that it came from that lawyer who obviously is trying to pull something. [01:40:20.680 --> 01:40:27.400] That's another clue. I'd be bargaining with these lawyers, the ones that are asserting that there [01:40:27.400 --> 01:40:40.760] is a claim. I would be... In Texas, it's chapter 32 about fraud, and I think it's 3249 saying it's [01:40:40.760 --> 01:40:51.080] a refusal to execute a release of a fraudulent claim or lien. So when somebody is faking it, [01:40:51.080 --> 01:40:56.600] saying, hey, I've got this lien. I've got a right to some interest in your property because [01:40:56.600 --> 01:41:02.760] unpaid whatever claim, and they're just... It's bogus. So you write to them and you say, [01:41:02.760 --> 01:41:07.160] you need to release this. This is what you're saying is not true. And then they have 21 days. [01:41:07.160 --> 01:41:10.360] If they don't release it in 21 days, they've committed a felony. [01:41:11.240 --> 01:41:12.280] Right. That would be some... [01:41:12.280 --> 01:41:14.360] Increase fraud, right? By creating a false lien? [01:41:15.240 --> 01:41:15.720] Right. [01:41:16.840 --> 01:41:18.040] Yeah. Okay. [01:41:19.080 --> 01:41:22.360] So I don't know if Florida's got that or if it's the same number of days, [01:41:23.480 --> 01:41:30.200] but definitely take a look at that. You would have more than one direction at the same time [01:41:30.200 --> 01:41:31.720] you could be slapping that lawyer. [01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:35.480] What's the title of that statute you just said? [01:41:35.480 --> 01:41:43.320] I think it's 3249. Hold on just a second. Let me see if I'm telling you right. Texas penal code [01:41:43.320 --> 01:41:58.920] 32.49. Let's see. I know it's in 32. Oh, yes, it is. It's refusal to execute release [01:41:58.920 --> 01:42:01.720] of fraudulent lien or claim. So... [01:42:01.720 --> 01:42:07.560] Refusal to execute release. Got it. Okay. All right. This one is not a felony. It's [01:42:07.560 --> 01:42:11.560] only a class A misdemeanor. It's the highest misdemeanor, but that's not up as high as a [01:42:11.560 --> 01:42:20.040] felony. But they have 21 days and then they're criminal. So you can bargrieve, you can file a [01:42:20.040 --> 01:42:28.840] criminal complaint and that'll sting him. He won't quickly want to be lying again. [01:42:28.840 --> 01:42:33.400] Florida. Sorry? Sorry. No, what I was saying was because [01:42:34.280 --> 01:42:40.120] Department of Revenue State of Florida is a party to the case, I can now bring in the state attorney [01:42:40.120 --> 01:42:45.560] general individually, right? I wouldn't want to go after office. I'd go after individually [01:42:45.560 --> 01:42:53.640] and then I can move it out of the county. As to whether you would do individually, [01:42:53.640 --> 01:43:00.840] I don't know if it would be individual. Okay. [01:43:00.840 --> 01:43:06.440] If you're bringing in the... What did the state attorney general do to you in his personal capacity? [01:43:08.920 --> 01:43:18.520] Well, they're representative. The guy who represents the child support enforcement program, [01:43:18.520 --> 01:43:25.720] which is the state attorney assistant, he is the one who's basically trying to drag me into [01:43:27.480 --> 01:43:33.720] an administrative hearing to get me to consent to allow them to now garnish my [01:43:35.160 --> 01:43:38.440] inheritance because they didn't do it right the first time. So now they're trying to cover their [01:43:38.440 --> 01:43:43.880] tracks. Gotcha. Okay. So yeah, that seems legit. That seems like a good way to go. [01:43:43.880 --> 01:43:49.880] Okay. Great. Awesome. Yeah. Then you get it out of the county. [01:43:51.560 --> 01:43:54.600] Yeah. Yeah, exactly. I'll just go after his boss. [01:43:59.320 --> 01:44:05.240] File criminal complaints and the only thing that I... And this was a question that I wanted to ask [01:44:05.240 --> 01:44:09.800] Randy at one point, but I didn't really have a chance. We just had a short brief email [01:44:09.800 --> 01:44:16.520] conversation, but when you file criminal complaints against these people and bar complaints and [01:44:16.520 --> 01:44:23.960] judicial complaints, because... And I don't think it's any different than anywhere else in the US, [01:44:23.960 --> 01:44:33.000] but in Broward it's extremely corrupt. There's a lot of messiness down there. I lost my family. [01:44:33.000 --> 01:44:41.160] My mother had a flip and fall allegedly when she passed away. And retaliatory, [01:44:41.160 --> 01:44:46.840] have you guys ever experienced anything from a retaliation standpoint from these officials, [01:44:46.840 --> 01:44:50.760] from the lawyers? Oh my, yes. [01:44:53.160 --> 01:44:56.520] Yeah. Yes. That's something to be prepared for. [01:44:56.520 --> 01:45:05.720] So from lawyers, not specifically, from other public officials, yes, it depends on how [01:45:06.600 --> 01:45:13.320] evil hearted they are. They just might do something really bad. Some of them won't dare to [01:45:13.320 --> 01:45:18.440] because they know that that's another crime. That's obstruction, retaliation, witness tampering, [01:45:18.440 --> 01:45:23.720] and others are just going to be so bold as to do something even more evil. [01:45:23.720 --> 01:45:32.840] I reported a sheriff's deputy for crimes. And right after that, I had a very thorough burglary. [01:45:35.640 --> 01:45:43.080] And it was extremely personal the way that they took everything. They didn't just come and take [01:45:43.080 --> 01:45:48.680] what they thought, you know, oh, let's get his solar equipment. Let's just... No, they didn't just [01:45:48.680 --> 01:45:58.200] take a little bit. They went for a very thorough house cleaning. They took, you know, every stick [01:45:58.200 --> 01:46:08.760] of furniture. They took my son's nightlight. They took half-burned candles. They were serious about [01:46:08.760 --> 01:46:16.600] whoever it was that was getting these items. They wanted them to make a point. So, you know, [01:46:16.600 --> 01:46:22.360] I suspect that sheriff's deputy and, you know, one of his buddies, there were two guys, they came, [01:46:22.360 --> 01:46:28.760] I could tell from footprints and tire tracks, they came with a trailer and cleaned me out. [01:46:29.720 --> 01:46:34.280] So, yes, there's a possibility of some retaliation. But then what is that? That's another crime. [01:46:35.960 --> 01:46:40.840] So, I've never seen anything like that happen with lawyers. Lawyers, they tend to, you know, [01:46:40.840 --> 01:46:45.240] their voice goes up a couple of octaves, they were up screaming and they went out. They went [01:46:45.240 --> 01:46:50.840] away. They don't want anything to do with you. They're in a hurry to escape. That's the [01:46:50.840 --> 01:46:55.800] difference I've noticed in patterns. But, yeah, bargaining them. [01:46:57.800 --> 01:47:03.480] And what are your thoughts with this type of case with regards to getting them in a federal court [01:47:03.480 --> 01:47:11.640] or, you know, suing them for, you know, not necessarily in 1983, but potentially wire fraud [01:47:11.640 --> 01:47:18.600] for transferring my parent's funds after I'd already revoked power of attorney. [01:47:18.600 --> 01:47:23.320] Okay. Yeah, great. Let's talk about that some more. We're just about to go to our sponsors again, [01:47:23.320 --> 01:47:28.920] so we'll talk about that some more. The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, [01:47:29.480 --> 01:47:33.240] yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [01:47:33.880 --> 01:47:39.800] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the [01:47:39.800 --> 01:47:46.520] profound meaning of the scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation [01:47:46.520 --> 01:47:53.080] is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [01:47:53.720 --> 01:47:59.560] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the [01:47:59.560 --> 01:48:04.920] riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would [01:48:04.920 --> 01:48:10.680] like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact [01:48:10.680 --> 01:48:20.920] study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online [01:48:20.920 --> 01:48:28.840] at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, [01:48:28.840 --> 01:48:35.880] logosradionetwork.com.