[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.500 --> 00:09.500]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.500 --> 00:11.000]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:11.000 --> 00:16.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.500 --> 00:18.500]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.500 --> 00:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:26.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.500 --> 00:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:34.500]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.500 --> 00:38.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[00:38.000 --> 00:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.000 --> 00:45.500]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:45.500 --> 00:47.500]  Spar, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.500 --> 00:51.000]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.000 --> 00:54.000]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.000 --> 00:56.500]  Spar with an extra P.
[00:56.500 --> 01:03.000]  S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:03.000 --> 01:08.500]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion.
[01:08.500 --> 01:10.500]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.500 --> 01:14.500]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.500 --> 01:17.500]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government,
[01:17.500 --> 01:21.000]  we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:21.000 --> 01:30.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:30.500 --> 01:34.500]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.500 --> 01:38.000]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.000 --> 01:39.500]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.500 --> 01:43.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:43.000 --> 01:46.000]  to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.000 --> 01:48.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.000 --> 01:51.500]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.500 --> 01:56.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.500 --> 01:58.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:58.000 --> 02:01.500]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.500 --> 02:04.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.000 --> 02:08.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[02:08.000 --> 02:12.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.000 --> 02:15.500]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.500 --> 02:19.500]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms
[02:19.500 --> 02:22.000]  around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.000 --> 02:26.000]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms,
[02:26.000 --> 02:30.000]  arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.000 --> 02:33.500]  Get it? Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:33.500 --> 02:37.500]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.500 --> 02:38.500]  when he said,
[02:38.500 --> 02:43.500]  The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[02:43.500 --> 02:47.500]  one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America,
[02:47.500 --> 02:51.000]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[02:51.000 --> 03:14.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:21.500 --> 03:27.500]  What are you going to do?
[03:27.500 --> 03:30.500]  Bad boys, bad boys, what are you going to do?
[03:30.500 --> 03:33.000]  What are you going to do when they come for you?
[03:33.000 --> 03:36.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, what are you going to do?
[03:36.000 --> 03:38.500]  What are you going to do when they come for you?
[03:38.500 --> 03:41.500]  When you were eight and you had bad traits,
[03:41.500 --> 03:44.000]  you'd go to school and learn the golden rules.
[03:44.000 --> 03:47.000]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[03:47.000 --> 03:49.500]  If you get caught in your master coup,
[03:49.500 --> 03:52.000]  bad boys, bad boys, what are you going to do?
[03:52.000 --> 03:55.000]  What are you going to do when they come for you?
[03:55.000 --> 03:58.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, what are you going to do?
[03:58.000 --> 04:00.500]  What are you going to do when they come for you?
[04:00.500 --> 04:03.000]  You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one,
[04:03.000 --> 04:06.000]  you chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father,
[04:06.000 --> 04:09.000]  you chuck it on your brother and you chuck it on your sister,
[04:09.000 --> 04:11.500]  you chuck it on that one and you chuck it on me.
[04:11.500 --> 04:14.500]  Bad boys, bad boys, what are you going to do?
[04:14.500 --> 04:17.500]  What are you going to do when they come for you?
[04:47.500 --> 04:49.660]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:49.980 --> 04:51.460]  BAD BOYS BAD BOYS
[04:51.560 --> 04:52.920]  Ah watcha gonna do?
[04:52.900 --> 04:55.420]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:55.400 --> 04:56.920]  BAD BOYS BAD BOYS
[04:57.040 --> 04:58.340]  Whatcha gonna do?
[04:58.500 --> 05:00.900]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[05:00.920 --> 05:02.520]  BAD BOYS BAD BOYS
[05:02.540 --> 05:04.040]  Ah watcha gonna do?
[05:04.040 --> 05:07.040]  What you gonna do when they come for you?
[05:28.040 --> 05:30.040]  Why did you have to ask so many?
[05:31.040 --> 05:33.040]  Don't you know you're a human being?
[05:33.040 --> 05:36.040]  Born of a mother with a lover with a father
[05:36.040 --> 05:39.040]  Reflect some ghosts, reflect some ghosts
[05:39.040 --> 05:41.040]  I know sometimes
[05:43.040 --> 05:46.040]  Howdy, howdy, Landy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Voodoo Law Radio
[05:46.040 --> 05:52.040]  on this, the 27th day of May, 2022
[05:53.040 --> 05:55.040]  Did it get that right, Brett?
[05:56.040 --> 05:58.040]  Would you believe 2023?
[05:59.040 --> 06:00.040]  No
[06:00.040 --> 06:01.040]  Oh, okay
[06:01.040 --> 06:03.040]  Well then, 2022's good
[06:03.040 --> 06:07.040]  Okay, he didn't remind me this time
[06:09.040 --> 06:11.040]  Well, you know how time flies
[06:11.040 --> 06:13.040]  Let's see if I can slip a year ahead of you
[06:13.040 --> 06:17.040]  I keep telling him that I've been taking these stem cells and I'm getting younger
[06:17.040 --> 06:21.040]  and he keeps telling me I'm just regressing
[06:22.040 --> 06:24.040]  Oh well, in any case
[06:24.040 --> 06:26.040]  But your skin looks great
[06:26.040 --> 06:28.040]  I don't want to talk about it
[06:28.040 --> 06:34.040]  Okay, I have my e-book up in front of me
[06:34.040 --> 06:39.040]  and I really need to dictate some chapters out of it
[06:39.040 --> 06:49.040]  so that we can build some videos or audios that people can listen to
[06:49.040 --> 06:51.040]  and kind of come up to speed
[06:51.040 --> 07:02.040]  What I find is that I spend a lot of time addressing some really basic misconceptions
[07:02.040 --> 07:07.040]  about law and the legal system and the way things actually work
[07:07.040 --> 07:17.040]  and it's hard to communicate this different mindset in bits and pieces
[07:17.040 --> 07:28.040]  So what I'd like to do, probably mostly Fridays, for the next few weeks or months, whatever it takes
[07:28.040 --> 07:37.040]  is spend the first two segments addressing some of the issues in the e-book
[07:37.040 --> 07:49.040]  The e-book is mostly about the basics of how to think about how the legal system really works
[07:49.040 --> 07:57.040]  as opposed to how we think it should work or believe it does work
[07:57.040 --> 08:01.040]  For the most part it does not work, think it does
[08:01.040 --> 08:11.040]  Nothing is as it appears on the surface, it's certainly not what we were taught in high school
[08:11.040 --> 08:17.040]  Although what we were taught in high school is really nice and it sounds great
[08:17.040 --> 08:23.040]  It's just that law is administered by human beings
[08:23.040 --> 08:32.040]  And if God made man, he made us horribly flawed
[08:32.040 --> 08:37.040]  And I would suspect that if God did make man, he did that on purpose
[08:37.040 --> 08:42.040]  If we were perfect, what would be the point?
[08:42.040 --> 08:56.040]  The Indians, mostly the first civilizations, considered their purpose here on the planet was to grow in the spirit
[08:56.040 --> 09:04.040]  And the only way to grow in the spirit was by making decisions that had power in them
[09:04.040 --> 09:11.040]  And the only decisions that had power in them were the difficult ones
[09:11.040 --> 09:18.040]  So it is my opinion that we were designed for difficulty
[09:18.040 --> 09:26.040]  I hear people saying that, oh, the sky is falling in and everything is going to crash tomorrow
[09:26.040 --> 09:31.040]  and it's doom and doom and oh, it's horrible where the country is going
[09:31.040 --> 09:38.040]  Well, if you're 20 or something, that probably has a really profound effect on you
[09:38.040 --> 09:50.040]  But by the time you turn 40 and 50 and 60 and 70, you've been hearing that for 70 years
[09:50.040 --> 09:57.040]  Same thing, oh, tomorrow we're all going to die so eat, drink and be merry
[09:57.040 --> 10:01.040]  The world is caving in around us, it's not caving in around us
[10:01.040 --> 10:05.040]  Well, they put new acronyms on it from time to time
[10:05.040 --> 10:08.040]  That's different kinds of things you're supposed to get scared of, right?
[10:08.040 --> 10:16.040]  Exactly, and it's just the nature of human beings
[10:16.040 --> 10:20.040]  Human beings are not like tigers
[10:20.040 --> 10:29.040]  Tigers are solitary hunters, they're very concerned about their liberty and their privacy
[10:29.040 --> 10:35.040]  A tiger will raise their young for two years and kick them out
[10:35.040 --> 10:45.040]  If the offspring then strays into the parents' hunting ground, the parent will let the offspring
[10:45.040 --> 10:49.040]  They're very solitary hunters
[10:49.040 --> 10:56.040]  Humans herd, we gather together in groups, it is in our nature
[10:56.040 --> 11:05.040]  And those groups tend to always have alpha males or alpha females and betas
[11:05.040 --> 11:10.040]  And the betas tend always to envy the alphas
[11:10.040 --> 11:15.040]  And the betas want to become the alphas, which they certainly can
[11:15.040 --> 11:20.040]  There is always this tension among the group
[11:20.040 --> 11:26.040]  We're not cows, they're herbivores and they're pretty sedate
[11:26.040 --> 11:33.040]  We're hunter killers, it's in our nature
[11:33.040 --> 11:40.040]  So when we're in our group, we're still hunter killers
[11:40.040 --> 11:49.040]  And what creature of all is better at killing each other than humans?
[11:49.040 --> 11:54.040]  It's what we do, we fight with each other all the time, it's nature
[11:54.040 --> 12:02.040]  So to think that this is going to go away sometime and we're going to have some utopian culture, good luck with that
[12:02.040 --> 12:07.040]  Hasn't happened yet, don't see it ever happening
[12:07.040 --> 12:14.040]  Life was made for enterprise, not for ease
[12:14.040 --> 12:19.040]  Sometimes I think that's what this fear stuff is about, is enterprise
[12:19.040 --> 12:25.040]  I think people are capitalizing on what they think other people would be scared of
[12:25.040 --> 12:32.040]  And if it gets to be a popular thing that's talked about, well then they can crank up prices on this or that
[12:32.040 --> 12:35.040]  It's more money in their pocket
[12:35.040 --> 12:40.040]  It's what we do, we crawl over one another all the time, we're always trying to
[12:40.040 --> 12:44.040]  Everybody wants to be at the top of the food chain
[12:44.040 --> 12:52.040]  And so we're always fighting with each other, human beings are always fighting with each other and they always will be
[12:52.040 --> 12:58.040]  That's not going to stop because it's in our genes, so just accept it and deal with it
[12:58.040 --> 13:03.040]  Let's handle this part of our nature as best we can
[13:03.040 --> 13:12.040]  The reason I say that is I have a problem with demonizing one or another member of this group
[13:12.040 --> 13:19.040]  We like to demonize the police and demonize public officials and demonize bankers
[13:19.040 --> 13:28.040]  Demonize anyone who does something that we don't consider to be in our immediate best interest
[13:28.040 --> 13:33.040]  It's what we do as human beings
[13:33.040 --> 13:36.040]  It's not always a good idea
[13:36.040 --> 13:44.040]  I strive toward somewhat more in the way of civility
[13:44.040 --> 13:50.040]  I want us all to find a way to locate the ground
[13:50.040 --> 13:58.040]  It took me getting a lot older to understand the way things really work
[13:58.040 --> 14:08.040]  And once I understand it, the key ingredient to making things work well is civility
[14:08.040 --> 14:18.040]  Brett knows I'm not particularly religious, but I do think the Bible to be a book of cultural wisdom
[14:18.040 --> 14:24.040]  And one of the wisest things I find in there is judge not that you be not judged
[14:24.040 --> 14:28.040]  For by that judgment which ye judge so shall ye be judged
[14:28.040 --> 14:37.040]  Thou hypocrite, how considerth thou the moat that is in thy brother's eye and considereth not the beam from thine own eye
[14:37.040 --> 14:47.040]  First cast out the beam from thine own eye that thou may see clearly to cast out the moat from thy brother's eye
[14:47.040 --> 14:50.040]  That's one of the wisest things I've seen in there
[14:50.040 --> 14:55.040]  And as I get older that gets more important
[14:55.040 --> 14:59.040]  We need to stop judging all these public officials
[14:59.040 --> 15:03.040]  I'm not saying we need to stop beating them up and pushing them around
[15:03.040 --> 15:08.040]  But stop passing judgment on it because when you pass judgment
[15:08.040 --> 15:19.040]  Then it shifts you into a gear that tends to cause you to make really bad decisions
[15:19.040 --> 15:24.040]  In the early days of the Christian system, they were similar to the Muslims
[15:24.040 --> 15:31.040]  If you weren't a believer, then you were an infidel
[15:31.040 --> 15:36.040]  What did the Christians call them? They didn't call them infidels
[15:36.040 --> 15:38.040]  What was the word for it?
[15:38.040 --> 15:42.040]  Are you thinking about the Catholics and the Crusades?
[15:42.040 --> 15:49.040]  Yeah, anyone who was a Catholic, the Muslims called them infidels
[15:49.040 --> 15:51.040]  Oh, you lost the word for it
[15:51.040 --> 15:53.040]  I don't know, heretics?
[15:53.040 --> 15:55.040]  No
[15:55.040 --> 15:57.040]  Anyway, it'll come to me in a minute
[15:57.040 --> 16:10.040]  The reason the Bible came about is because the Christians were gaining power in Rome in 363 AD
[16:10.040 --> 16:12.040]  I think 363 is right
[16:12.040 --> 16:15.040]  Are you saying that's how the Bible came about?
[16:15.040 --> 16:18.040]  Yeah, the Council of Nicaea
[16:18.040 --> 16:24.040]  No, no, no, that was just part of what the Catholic institution was doing
[16:24.040 --> 16:28.040]  The Catholicists at the Council of Nicaea put together it
[16:28.040 --> 16:31.040]  They didn't come up with the Bible?
[16:31.040 --> 16:35.040]  That had been built and developed for a lot longer than that
[16:35.040 --> 16:41.040]  Yeah, well, the Bible was made up of writings of the prophets
[16:41.040 --> 16:44.040]  And prophet didn't mean someone who prophesied the future at that time
[16:44.040 --> 16:49.040]  It meant someone through whom God spoke
[16:49.040 --> 16:54.040]  But all the words of the prophet, all the works of the prophet were not put in
[16:54.040 --> 16:57.040]  Textus recepticus
[16:57.040 --> 17:00.040]  He left whole bunch out
[17:00.040 --> 17:05.040]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[17:05.040 --> 17:09.040]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method
[17:09.040 --> 17:14.040]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two
[17:14.040 --> 17:20.040]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes
[17:20.040 --> 17:24.040]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons
[17:24.040 --> 17:26.040]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[17:26.040 --> 17:29.040]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports
[17:29.040 --> 17:33.040]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[17:33.040 --> 17:38.040]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[17:38.040 --> 17:41.040]  Personal consultation is available as well
[17:41.040 --> 17:46.040]  For more information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[17:46.040 --> 17:49.040]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[17:49.040 --> 17:51.040]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[17:51.040 --> 17:57.040]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[17:57.040 --> 18:00.040]  To learn how to stop debt collectors next
[18:00.040 --> 18:04.040]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar
[18:04.040 --> 18:07.040]  In today's America we live in an us against them society
[18:07.040 --> 18:09.040]  And if we the people are ever going to have a free society
[18:09.040 --> 18:12.040]  Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[18:12.040 --> 18:15.040]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[18:15.040 --> 18:17.040]  The right to act in our own private capacity
[18:17.040 --> 18:19.040]  And most importantly the right to due process of law
[18:19.040 --> 18:25.040]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[18:25.040 --> 18:28.040]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[18:28.040 --> 18:33.040]  Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[18:33.040 --> 18:35.040]  And how to hold courts to the rule of law
[18:35.040 --> 18:39.040]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[18:39.040 --> 18:40.040]  And ordering your copy today
[18:40.040 --> 18:42.040]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book
[18:42.040 --> 18:45.040]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie
[18:45.040 --> 18:47.040]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[18:47.040 --> 18:50.040]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[18:50.040 --> 18:54.040]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com
[18:54.040 --> 18:59.040]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve
[18:59.040 --> 19:04.040]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[19:04.040 --> 19:30.040]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[19:30.040 --> 19:40.040]  The world is spinning like it's out of control
[19:40.040 --> 19:44.040]  On the edge of a hole inside a deep dark dome
[19:44.040 --> 19:50.040]  I'm always on the lookout for something to soothe my soul
[19:50.040 --> 19:56.040]  Now I sit back and watch the evidence unfold
[19:56.040 --> 20:04.040]  And I see justice is the goal
[20:04.040 --> 20:10.040]  Justice is the goal
[20:10.040 --> 20:13.040]  Time to sail a little too far at sea
[20:13.040 --> 20:16.040]  And then we got to get back on course we won't see
[20:16.040 --> 20:19.040]  We go under heavy advisory
[20:19.040 --> 20:23.040]  From the man that came all the way from Galilee
[20:23.040 --> 20:26.040]  What you call a safe and warm place to be
[20:26.040 --> 20:29.040]  Where I don't have to work so hard to be free
[20:29.040 --> 20:32.040]  Some guys are trying to rewrite history
[20:32.040 --> 20:35.040]  But they got caught, now them guys got to bleed
[20:35.040 --> 20:42.040]  Looks like justice
[20:42.040 --> 20:48.040]  Looks like justice
[20:48.040 --> 21:15.040]  Yeah, yeah
[21:15.040 --> 21:18.040]  The only way we're gonna get corruption to cease
[21:18.040 --> 21:21.040]  Is when we finally learn how to police the police
[21:21.040 --> 21:24.040]  The folks return to say that we were boiling the seas
[21:24.040 --> 21:28.040]  Next thing you know the whole place is a heart tree
[21:28.040 --> 21:31.040]  These are donors to return from the belly of the beast
[21:31.040 --> 21:34.040]  The whole world got our brand new lease
[21:34.040 --> 21:40.040]  Looks like justice
[21:40.040 --> 21:49.040]  Only justice
[21:49.040 --> 21:53.040]  Okay, we are back. Brent Felton with La Radio.
[21:53.040 --> 21:58.040]  And sorry for the delay, but we were doing some sound work on my end.
[21:58.040 --> 22:01.040]  Mine tends to get screwed up on occasion.
[22:01.040 --> 22:05.040]  I think Brett sneaks in here and does it when I'm not looking.
[22:05.040 --> 22:07.040]  Yeah, that's it.
[22:07.040 --> 22:10.040]  That last segment was going somewhere.
[22:10.040 --> 22:12.040]  What did we want to start with?
[22:12.040 --> 22:16.040]  So I really wanted to talk about
[22:16.040 --> 22:22.040]  when we need to stop finding people to blame for the problems
[22:22.040 --> 22:27.040]  and start finding methods towards solutions.
[22:27.040 --> 22:30.040]  Since I have a full board of callers,
[22:30.040 --> 22:34.040]  I won't bend your ear on that subject any further.
[22:34.040 --> 22:41.040]  We will start with, I'm looking to see if we have a first-time caller.
[22:41.040 --> 22:45.040]  It looks like we do have one.
[22:45.040 --> 22:53.040]  If you are in the 210 area code, talk to me.
[22:53.040 --> 22:55.040]  Hello?
[22:55.040 --> 22:59.040]  Hello. Are you a first-time caller?
[22:59.040 --> 23:01.040]  I am.
[23:01.040 --> 23:05.040]  What is your first name and estate?
[23:05.040 --> 23:11.040]  First name and estate, Becky, and I'm in Texas.
[23:11.040 --> 23:13.040]  Becky where?
[23:13.040 --> 23:15.040]  She said Becky in Texas.
[23:15.040 --> 23:17.040]  Hello, Becky.
[23:17.040 --> 23:18.040]  Hello.
[23:18.040 --> 23:19.040]  Hello, Becky.
[23:19.040 --> 23:24.040]  What do you have for us today?
[23:24.040 --> 23:31.040]  Well, we have, except six and a half years ago, tried to bring them home
[23:31.040 --> 23:34.040]  and have no clue how to do so.
[23:34.040 --> 23:35.040]  Wait a minute.
[23:35.040 --> 23:38.040]  One thing is we're on radio, and on radio,
[23:38.040 --> 23:43.040]  unlike when you're sitting in front of someone, you can't see their lips.
[23:43.040 --> 23:46.040]  So in order for people to understand you better,
[23:46.040 --> 23:48.040]  you need to talk a little bit slower
[23:48.040 --> 23:55.040]  because it takes us a little bit longer to stitch the pieces together.
[23:55.040 --> 24:00.040]  The short of it is you're talking faster than I can listen.
[24:00.040 --> 24:01.040]  I'm sorry.
[24:01.040 --> 24:02.040]  Okay.
[24:02.040 --> 24:12.040]  I have seven children that CPS kidnapped six and a half years ago,
[24:12.040 --> 24:16.040]  and we have no idea how to bring them home.
[24:16.040 --> 24:18.040]  Kidnapped?
[24:18.040 --> 24:24.040]  Kidnapped by some criminal on the street or by Child Protective Services?
[24:24.040 --> 24:31.040]  Child Protective Services.
[24:31.040 --> 24:33.040]  Seven years ago?
[24:33.040 --> 24:35.040]  Six and a half.
[24:35.040 --> 24:37.040]  I can only imagine.
[24:37.040 --> 24:39.040]  Seven years.
[24:39.040 --> 24:47.040]  Bringing them back after this amount of time is going to be difficult.
[24:47.040 --> 24:54.040]  But Child Protective Services is not my area of special knowledge.
[24:54.040 --> 25:00.040]  Brett, do you have any knowledge beyond mine on this subject area?
[25:00.040 --> 25:01.040]  No.
[25:01.040 --> 25:03.040]  I wish I did.
[25:03.040 --> 25:07.040]  I was hoping that you would be able to speak into that.
[25:07.040 --> 25:11.040]  I can do the normal things, hold individual men and women accountable,
[25:11.040 --> 25:14.040]  criminal complaints and so forth,
[25:14.040 --> 25:19.040]  but I don't know what to do within their system of what they would respect
[25:19.040 --> 25:23.040]  and respond to.
[25:23.040 --> 25:27.040]  They've got a whole system of processes,
[25:27.040 --> 25:31.040]  and they presume to have authority to do whatever they think best
[25:31.040 --> 25:35.040]  in other people's families, and so I don't know how you interrupt that.
[25:35.040 --> 25:41.040]  You talk about bringing an interruption to somebody's pattern.
[25:41.040 --> 25:47.040]  What have you done in the last six years to recover your children?
[25:47.040 --> 25:55.040]  Well, we contracted with them unknowingly.
[25:55.040 --> 25:57.040]  Hold on, hold on, hold on.
[25:57.040 --> 26:00.040]  Contracted with them is a term of art.
[26:00.040 --> 26:03.040]  Will you explain what that means?
[26:03.040 --> 26:09.040]  We did all the services, child protection services, required.
[26:09.040 --> 26:19.040]  They set up a sham trial April before that
[26:19.040 --> 26:27.040]  and condescend to giving permanent managing conservators.
[26:27.040 --> 26:30.040]  We had no idea what that meant.
[26:30.040 --> 26:32.040]  Okay, let me take another step back.
[26:32.040 --> 26:40.040]  Are your children in foster care?
[26:40.040 --> 26:44.040]  Five of them are.
[26:44.040 --> 26:48.040]  Two of them refuse to be in foster care.
[26:48.040 --> 26:51.040]  They are in placements.
[26:51.040 --> 26:58.040]  One caseworker has contacted my oldest son for me to contract
[26:58.040 --> 27:06.040]  with child protection services yet again and send my 15-year-old home,
[27:06.040 --> 27:11.040]  and I won't contract with them again.
[27:11.040 --> 27:15.040]  I'm not sure what you mean by contract with them again.
[27:15.040 --> 27:23.040]  You don't want to interact with whatever they consider as their prescription for your life?
[27:23.040 --> 27:32.040]  Correct. So if I'm doing parenting classes, I am contracting with them.
[27:32.040 --> 27:40.040]  So at the beginning, and I didn't snap to what was going on when this first started,
[27:40.040 --> 27:44.040]  the judge said, he says, why are we here?
[27:44.040 --> 27:53.040]  They did nothing wrong.
[27:53.040 --> 28:03.040]  The prosecutor said, we have a contract.
[28:03.040 --> 28:05.040]  Something's not making sense here.
[28:05.040 --> 28:13.040]  What was the claim against you that instigated the taking of all your children from you?
[28:13.040 --> 28:21.040]  Homeless, living in a 15-passenger van, children walking with no shoes on while they're at home,
[28:21.040 --> 28:27.040]  children being dirty while at home, holes in their clothes while at home,
[28:27.040 --> 28:38.040]  playing while they're dirty, children going around with a lawnmower asking for work,
[28:38.040 --> 28:44.040]  and none of that is illegal, not a single bit of it.
[28:44.040 --> 28:49.040]  Children are allowed to go make their own money.
[28:49.040 --> 28:55.040]  And the child, they said, was walking the streets alone.
[28:55.040 --> 28:57.040]  My husband was actually with him.
[28:57.040 --> 29:02.040]  They went to go get baby wipes two blocks away,
[29:02.040 --> 29:13.040]  and my husband helped my son cross the street and watched him walk back to the house with the wipe.
[29:13.040 --> 29:14.040]  Okay.
[29:14.040 --> 29:19.040]  What we can't do here on this show is re-elitigate the issues.
[29:19.040 --> 29:20.040]  Right.
[29:20.040 --> 29:24.040]  I'm wondering what all has been going on in these seven years.
[29:24.040 --> 29:27.040]  Are you still homeless?
[29:27.040 --> 29:28.040]  Oh, no.
[29:28.040 --> 29:31.040]  No, we're on seven acres right now.
[29:31.040 --> 29:35.040]  How long have you been on seven acres?
[29:35.040 --> 29:40.040]  Almost three years.
[29:40.040 --> 29:44.040]  But at that time, your children had been in foster care for four years.
[29:44.040 --> 29:47.040]  See, that's a long time.
[29:47.040 --> 29:51.040]  Yeah, so we've been trying for this entire time.
[29:51.040 --> 29:59.040]  We started somebody's process, which I don't think I should mention on air.
[29:59.040 --> 30:05.040]  It's clear cell phones have changed the way we live and work,
[30:05.040 --> 30:07.040]  but have they negatively affected our health?
[30:07.040 --> 30:10.040]  Hi, Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment
[30:10.040 --> 30:15.040]  with new findings about how cell phones may actually alter our brain chemistry.
[30:15.040 --> 30:17.040]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.040 --> 30:20.040]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.040 --> 30:25.040]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:25.040 --> 30:30.040]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.040 --> 30:33.040]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.040 --> 30:37.040]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:37.040 --> 30:41.040]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.040 --> 30:44.040]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.040 --> 30:47.040]  Cell phones emit radio frequency energy.
[30:47.040 --> 30:48.040]  It's a fact.
[30:48.040 --> 30:51.040]  But whether it's dangerous to have a phone beaming this kind of radiation
[30:51.040 --> 30:53.040]  near your head has been disputed.
[30:53.040 --> 30:57.040]  Some have blamed it for brain tumors, while cell phone companies have downplayed concerns.
[30:57.040 --> 31:00.040]  Well, now the Journal of the American Medical Association
[31:00.040 --> 31:03.040]  is confirming that cell phones affect brain chemistry.
[31:03.040 --> 31:07.040]  A study of 47 volunteers showed that glucose metabolism
[31:07.040 --> 31:12.040]  in the area of the brain closest to the cell phone antenna increases when the cell phone is on.
[31:12.040 --> 31:15.040]  While researchers aren't sure whether this exposure causes damage,
[31:15.040 --> 31:17.040]  I'm not taking any chances.
[31:17.040 --> 31:21.040]  I always keep the phone far from my body, and I use a corded headset.
[31:21.040 --> 31:25.040]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:51.040 --> 31:56.040]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word?
[31:56.040 --> 32:01.040]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time
[32:01.040 --> 32:05.040]  for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures
[32:05.040 --> 32:08.040]  in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[32:08.040 --> 32:11.040]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, always.
[32:11.040 --> 32:22.040]  A workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
[32:22.040 --> 32:26.040]  Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark,
[32:26.040 --> 32:30.040]  where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[32:30.040 --> 32:33.040]  Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week
[32:33.040 --> 32:37.040]  with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[32:37.040 --> 32:41.040]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:41.040 --> 32:45.040]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves
[32:45.040 --> 32:48.040]  more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[32:48.040 --> 32:52.040]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com
[32:52.040 --> 32:58.040]  Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[32:58.040 --> 33:10.040]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:28.040 --> 33:39.040]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with Fountain Road of Law Radio.
[33:39.040 --> 33:47.040]  And Becky, this is way too complicated for us to do here on this show.
[33:47.040 --> 33:54.040]  Can you write up a timeline?
[33:54.040 --> 33:57.040]  Oh, I guess you can talk better if I'm on YouTube.
[33:57.040 --> 34:00.040]  Okay, you are still muted. Sorry about that.
[34:00.040 --> 34:02.040]  Okay, a timeline.
[34:02.040 --> 34:07.040]  I need a list of everything that happened and when it happened.
[34:07.040 --> 34:12.040]  I can see what I can do about getting that done.
[34:12.040 --> 34:15.040]  How do I hold them accountable?
[34:15.040 --> 34:18.040]  Don't know yet. Don't have the details.
[34:18.040 --> 34:22.040]  Depends on what's going on.
[34:22.040 --> 34:28.040]  I can't just say, oh, you can hold them accountable this way or that way.
[34:28.040 --> 34:31.040]  You can only hold them accountable for the things that they did.
[34:31.040 --> 34:33.040]  That's why I need a timeline.
[34:33.040 --> 34:39.040]  So I can go down the timeline and see what they did and when.
[34:39.040 --> 34:42.040]  Yeah, he'll spot things. Things will stand out to him.
[34:42.040 --> 34:48.040]  As he looks at the timeline, he'll say, oh, this means that.
[34:48.040 --> 34:53.040]  There's no shotgun approach to something like this.
[34:53.040 --> 34:54.040]  Okay.
[34:54.040 --> 35:00.040]  Go to the courts and get a docket sheet from the clerk.
[35:00.040 --> 35:05.040]  That will contain a list of everything that's been filed in the case.
[35:05.040 --> 35:08.040]  That can be the beginning of your timeline.
[35:08.040 --> 35:12.040]  Like a skeleton, you can attach everything to it.
[35:12.040 --> 35:19.040]  You go to the front of it and write down everything that occurred before you got to court.
[35:19.040 --> 35:31.040]  And then look at the different dates on the documents that were filed and put in anything that happened in between those dates.
[35:31.040 --> 35:34.040]  And get us a good idea of everything that's going on.
[35:34.040 --> 35:38.040]  Then I can look at that and then we can talk about it.
[35:38.040 --> 35:39.040]  Okay.
[35:39.040 --> 35:43.040]  This is so general. We have no idea what to do.
[35:43.040 --> 35:45.040]  And it won't be easy.
[35:45.040 --> 35:52.040]  It's kind of a task to do this, but it's going to be really useful for you and anybody who wants to help you.
[35:52.040 --> 35:56.040]  It'll be super useful as a launching point.
[35:56.040 --> 36:11.040]  And strengthen your heart as you go into this because you'll have to be kind of reliving some of these experiences and feelings that what was going on.
[36:11.040 --> 36:15.040]  Just make notes and cry and keep going.
[36:15.040 --> 36:16.040]  Right.
[36:16.040 --> 36:23.040]  Do I need to have any of the documents that were in the case?
[36:23.040 --> 36:26.040]  I have almost none that were stolen from me.
[36:26.040 --> 36:28.040]  No, we don't need those yet.
[36:28.040 --> 36:31.040]  The clerk has all of them, so that's not a problem.
[36:31.040 --> 36:34.040]  Right now we're just needing to know what happened.
[36:34.040 --> 36:36.040]  And you can get copies again.
[36:36.040 --> 36:38.040]  If it was stolen from you, you can still go back.
[36:38.040 --> 36:44.040]  The court clerk will have – you can get another copy from the court clerk.
[36:44.040 --> 36:55.040]  But if you can just – in the timeline, if you can just at least list out what the documents were and what date, then that helps to kind of see what was going on.
[36:55.040 --> 36:56.040]  All right.
[36:56.040 --> 37:01.040]  The court clerk already told me it's a dollar a page.
[37:01.040 --> 37:02.040]  No, no, no.
[37:02.040 --> 37:03.040]  Okay.
[37:03.040 --> 37:04.040]  We're worried about that.
[37:04.040 --> 37:09.040]  You can file a motion for inability to pay, and it takes care of all of that.
[37:09.040 --> 37:11.040]  We're not worried about that now.
[37:11.040 --> 37:13.040]  Now we need to figure out what's going on.
[37:13.040 --> 37:16.040]  And you can go inspect the record for free.
[37:16.040 --> 37:21.040]  You show up at the court clerk, and you just sit there, and they'll hand you the whole folder.
[37:21.040 --> 37:24.040]  You can flip through it and take photos with your phone.
[37:24.040 --> 37:30.040]  You can scratch notes on your own notes, not on there, but, you know, on the side, get you a steno pad or something.
[37:30.040 --> 37:32.040]  You can do whatever you need to do.
[37:32.040 --> 37:35.040]  Flip through them all, and that's free.
[37:35.040 --> 37:36.040]  Okay.
[37:36.040 --> 37:38.040]  I appreciate that.
[37:38.040 --> 37:42.040]  If the clerk gives you much of a problem, we got methods for handling clerks for that.
[37:42.040 --> 37:46.040]  And clerks with attitude.
[37:46.040 --> 37:49.040]  So all that we can handle, but first we need to know what's going on.
[37:49.040 --> 37:52.040]  So get us a timeline.
[37:52.040 --> 38:07.040]  Once you have that, email it to me, Randy, R-E-N-D-Y, at rule, R-U-L-E, of law, radio.com.
[38:07.040 --> 38:10.040]  Then we can talk.
[38:10.040 --> 38:13.040]  Pardon.
[38:13.040 --> 38:15.040]  Okay.
[38:15.040 --> 38:17.040]  Yes.
[38:17.040 --> 38:19.040]  Thank you for calling.
[38:19.040 --> 38:23.040]  And now we're going to go to Chris from Colorado.
[38:23.040 --> 38:25.040]  Hello, Chris.
[38:25.040 --> 38:29.040]  What do you have for us today?
[38:29.040 --> 38:35.040]  Well, I'm still reading over my order from the judge.
[38:35.040 --> 38:43.040]  And it just seems like he's extremely biased at this point.
[38:43.040 --> 38:45.040]  Okay.
[38:45.040 --> 38:50.040]  Just before you go further, who cares?
[38:50.040 --> 38:56.040]  Your only purpose in the trial court is what?
[38:56.040 --> 38:58.040]  To prepare for appeal.
[38:58.040 --> 38:59.040]  Exactly.
[38:59.040 --> 39:07.040]  Okay. So the worse job the judge does, the better you'll do on appeal.
[39:07.040 --> 39:08.040]  Okay.
[39:08.040 --> 39:12.040]  So here, you know, we talk a little bit about chess games,
[39:12.040 --> 39:17.040]  and I think federal judges sometimes there's some intelligence egos going on.
[39:17.040 --> 39:19.040]  This guy's smart.
[39:19.040 --> 39:22.040]  I'm not saying that I'm smart enough to be able to determine if he's smart,
[39:22.040 --> 39:26.040]  but I'm seeing a chess game go on.
[39:26.040 --> 39:29.040]  I'll give you a quick example.
[39:29.040 --> 39:33.040]  So he asked me if I've ever done this before when I first started,
[39:33.040 --> 39:38.040]  and then in my first claim, he basically hinted I should go to state court.
[39:38.040 --> 39:39.040]  Okay.
[39:39.040 --> 39:42.040]  Because I wasn't worth his presence.
[39:42.040 --> 39:46.040]  And then I upped the ante and I put in a pretty darn good complaint, I think,
[39:46.040 --> 39:50.040]  because I've had more compliments from people I never expect compliments from,
[39:50.040 --> 39:52.040]  including defense attorneys.
[39:52.040 --> 39:53.040]  Who are they?
[39:53.040 --> 39:54.040]  Blowing smoke, probably.
[39:54.040 --> 39:55.040]  Who knows?
[39:55.040 --> 39:58.040]  But here's what he said in his opening statement.
[39:58.040 --> 40:01.040]  As his automobile was towed from a parking lot while he was dining in a
[40:01.040 --> 40:03.040]  nearby restaurant in Chicago,
[40:03.040 --> 40:08.040]  pro se plaintiff made a federal case of it.
[40:08.040 --> 40:10.040]  That's his opening statement.
[40:10.040 --> 40:14.040]  And that pretty much says that I'm not worthy to be in his court.
[40:14.040 --> 40:17.040]  But then underneath of it, he basically said he can't dismiss it
[40:17.040 --> 40:20.040]  because of some of the claims.
[40:20.040 --> 40:21.040]  All right.
[40:21.040 --> 40:26.040]  One of those claims, and this is the confusing part, is consumer fraud.
[40:26.040 --> 40:29.040]  That's the basis of my suit, is fraud.
[40:29.040 --> 40:33.040]  And I already have a judgment from the administrative courts there in Chicago
[40:33.040 --> 40:36.040]  who brought that tow company into the courts,
[40:36.040 --> 40:40.040]  fined them and judged them with consumer fraud.
[40:40.040 --> 40:43.040]  They pled liable and they waived their right to appeal.
[40:43.040 --> 40:45.040]  So we already have a consumer fraud.
[40:45.040 --> 40:46.040]  Okay, hold on.
[40:46.040 --> 40:51.040]  If I could mark on that, that's res judicata.
[40:51.040 --> 40:52.040]  Right.
[40:52.040 --> 40:56.040]  That is not something this federal judge can touch.
[40:56.040 --> 40:57.040]  But he did.
[40:57.040 --> 41:00.040]  He must accept that as a proper ruling.
[41:00.040 --> 41:03.040]  He can't readdress it.
[41:03.040 --> 41:04.040]  Okay.
[41:04.040 --> 41:06.040]  That's for everybody else.
[41:06.040 --> 41:12.040]  Once a ruling is made, the federal courts under Rooker Feldman cannot dip
[41:12.040 --> 41:20.040]  into the states because there's a lot of confusion going around about
[41:20.040 --> 41:23.040]  what a state actually is.
[41:23.040 --> 41:27.040]  People tend to think that the states are our political subdivision
[41:27.040 --> 41:31.040]  of the United States, and there are no such thing.
[41:31.040 --> 41:33.040]  State, look it up.
[41:33.040 --> 41:36.040]  It means sovereign nation.
[41:36.040 --> 41:42.040]  We have a union where 50 sovereign nations have opted into that union,
[41:42.040 --> 41:48.040]  but they granted the federal government very limited authority.
[41:48.040 --> 41:59.040]  And going in to change the rulings of state agency is not within their authority.
[41:59.040 --> 42:00.040]  Okay.
[42:00.040 --> 42:02.040]  Go ahead, Chris.
[42:02.040 --> 42:03.040]  Okay.
[42:03.040 --> 42:05.040]  So this is the most important one.
[42:05.040 --> 42:07.040]  I mean, all the rest of it is almost as ridiculous.
[42:07.040 --> 42:09.040]  But this is, like you said, res judicata.
[42:09.040 --> 42:10.040]  It's already been decided.
[42:10.040 --> 42:14.040]  And I put that in my suit because they tried to come up with this nexus test
[42:14.040 --> 42:17.040]  that I don't fall into the guidelines of the consumer.
[42:17.040 --> 42:21.040]  Well, how could I not fall into it when there's been a judgment with my name on it,
[42:21.040 --> 42:24.040]  although it wasn't on my behalf specifically?
[42:24.040 --> 42:28.040]  The judgment and the action taken against me was consumer fraud.
[42:28.040 --> 42:31.040]  Therefore, res judicata already decided.
[42:31.040 --> 42:32.040]  And that's what I said.
[42:32.040 --> 42:37.040]  All I had to do was link the elements into my own civil suit, which wasn't hard to do.
[42:37.040 --> 42:38.040]  I mean, there's just a couple elements.
[42:38.040 --> 42:39.040]  You spell them out.
[42:39.040 --> 42:40.040]  There you go.
[42:40.040 --> 42:42.040]  That was one of my shortest claims.
[42:42.040 --> 42:47.040]  Well, the defense came up with this thing saying that I don't fit the nexus for a consumer
[42:47.040 --> 42:49.040]  because I wasn't engaged directly with the tow company.
[42:49.040 --> 42:54.040]  Therefore, I wasn't in consumer affairs, so to speak, right?
[42:54.040 --> 42:57.040]  And the judge came up with he agreed with them.
[42:57.040 --> 42:59.040]  And he also came up with his own thing.
[42:59.040 --> 43:04.040]  Like, students who are filing claims under the ICFA, I don't know what that means,
[43:04.040 --> 43:05.040]  were not consumers.
[43:05.040 --> 43:07.040]  There's some stupid...
[43:07.040 --> 43:08.040]  Wait a minute.
[43:08.040 --> 43:09.040]  Wait a minute.
[43:09.040 --> 43:17.040]  Did the state address you except that you were a consumer?
[43:17.040 --> 43:19.040]  Yes.
[43:19.040 --> 43:22.040]  Then this leads to raising objection.
[43:22.040 --> 43:25.040]  This is not a place the court can go.
[43:25.040 --> 43:31.040]  This should get a subject matter jurisdiction challenge.
[43:31.040 --> 43:32.040]  Well, that's the...
[43:32.040 --> 43:33.040]  They can't...
[43:33.040 --> 43:34.040]  You know, I listened to...
[43:34.040 --> 43:36.040]  Sorry.
[43:36.040 --> 43:38.040]  They can't go to this subject.
[43:38.040 --> 43:39.040]  It's already been...
[43:39.040 --> 43:42.040]  It's already been determined.
[43:42.040 --> 43:50.040]  They don't have the power to dip into the state and change the state's determination.
[43:50.040 --> 43:54.040]  And he's indirectly trying to do that.
[43:54.040 --> 43:55.040]  That's okay.
[43:55.040 --> 43:56.040]  That's good.
[43:56.040 --> 44:00.040]  This will play well when we get to the court of appeal.
[44:00.040 --> 44:04.040]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[44:04.040 --> 44:06.040]  except in the area of nutrition.
[44:06.040 --> 44:09.040]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[44:09.040 --> 44:11.040]  And it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.040 --> 44:17.040]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.040 --> 44:22.040]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[44:22.040 --> 44:26.040]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[44:26.040 --> 44:30.040]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[44:30.040 --> 44:32.040]  most of which we reject.
[44:32.040 --> 44:34.040]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much,
[44:34.040 --> 44:40.040]  we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:40.040 --> 44:43.040]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com,
[44:43.040 --> 44:48.040]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[44:48.040 --> 44:52.040]  If you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[44:52.040 --> 44:57.040]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[44:57.040 --> 44:59.040]  and increase your income.
[44:59.040 --> 45:01.040]  Order now.
[45:01.040 --> 45:04.040]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.040 --> 45:08.040]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[45:08.040 --> 45:16.040]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:16.040 --> 45:19.040]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.040 --> 45:23.040]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.040 --> 45:28.040]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.040 --> 45:34.040]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.040 --> 45:39.040]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.040 --> 45:43.040]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.040 --> 45:49.040]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.040 --> 45:52.040]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.040 --> 46:14.040]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:14.040 --> 46:24.040]  Thank you.
[46:45.040 --> 46:47.040]  Okay.
[46:47.040 --> 46:48.040]  We are back.
[46:48.040 --> 46:51.040]  Brandon Kelp, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[46:51.040 --> 46:55.040]  And I said as we went over the cliff that we could take all those guys
[46:55.040 --> 46:58.040]  and just throw them over the cliff with me.
[46:58.040 --> 47:01.040]  Why didn't you tell me that, Chris?
[47:01.040 --> 47:03.040]  Boy, you were on a roll there.
[47:03.040 --> 47:04.040]  It was really good hearing.
[47:04.040 --> 47:06.040]  I was trying to get you there.
[47:06.040 --> 47:10.040]  I was really right at the cliff.
[47:10.040 --> 47:13.040]  But yeah, this is a good thing.
[47:13.040 --> 47:15.040]  This is great.
[47:15.040 --> 47:16.040]  Okay.
[47:16.040 --> 47:18.040]  This goes to Rooker Falman.
[47:18.040 --> 47:24.040]  So the judge gave you a real easy play in the Court of Appeals.
[47:24.040 --> 47:31.040]  But pay real close attention to his arguments so that when you go to appeal,
[47:31.040 --> 47:35.040]  you can undermine his arguments.
[47:35.040 --> 47:42.040]  Generally, the federal courts are pretty good about giving you a judgment.
[47:42.040 --> 47:46.040]  Did he give you essentially findings, facts, and conclusions at law
[47:46.040 --> 47:49.040]  showing how he got to his ruling?
[47:49.040 --> 47:51.040]  In almost every single moment, yeah, which is crazy.
[47:51.040 --> 47:56.040]  You know how he spelled it out the first time to me real clear kind of with Olivier?
[47:56.040 --> 47:57.040]  He does that.
[47:57.040 --> 47:59.040]  He's very, very clear about what I need to correct.
[47:59.040 --> 48:03.040]  But he's also very almost cryptic as he's doing it.
[48:03.040 --> 48:06.040]  It's just I'm trying to figure out what he's doing.
[48:06.040 --> 48:10.040]  And the only thing I could come up with is that if he gets some of these claims not to go forward,
[48:10.040 --> 48:14.040]  my damage claims might fall underneath a certain amount,
[48:14.040 --> 48:17.040]  and I have to leave federal court.
[48:17.040 --> 48:19.040]  That's one angle.
[48:19.040 --> 48:23.040]  The other angle is he's telling me so much about what I need to correct,
[48:23.040 --> 48:25.040]  I can't figure out why he would do all that.
[48:25.040 --> 48:27.040]  He's setting himself up.
[48:27.040 --> 48:28.040]  No, hold on, hold on.
[48:28.040 --> 48:32.040]  That's what they do.
[48:32.040 --> 48:34.040]  That's not a bad thing.
[48:34.040 --> 48:35.040]  Yeah.
[48:35.040 --> 48:40.040]  The judges tell you, this is what's wrong with your pleading.
[48:40.040 --> 48:42.040]  Fix it and bring it to me.
[48:42.040 --> 48:47.040]  And he tells the other side, this is what's wrong with your pleadings.
[48:47.040 --> 48:49.040]  Fix them and bring them to me.
[48:49.040 --> 48:59.040]  Bring me the best document you can so that I can make the best decision that I can.
[48:59.040 --> 49:04.040]  So don't assume the judge is against you.
[49:04.040 --> 49:09.040]  Even if it seems really suspicious that he would act helpful.
[49:09.040 --> 49:11.040]  Well, he's being very cautious.
[49:11.040 --> 49:13.040]  And the next example here I'll give to you,
[49:13.040 --> 49:15.040]  but I want to answer your question, Randy, as clear as I could.
[49:15.040 --> 49:19.040]  You asked me, did they specifically say I was the consumer in this matter?
[49:19.040 --> 49:24.040]  This is the Court of Administrative Hearings, right?
[49:24.040 --> 49:27.040]  So they're just kind of a quasi-court, but they are a court.
[49:27.040 --> 49:31.040]  And people who, you know, it's a valid judgment.
[49:31.040 --> 49:34.040]  But they didn't say that I was a consumer.
[49:34.040 --> 49:40.040]  They charged the company with consumer fraud as it pertained to the towing of my vehicle,
[49:40.040 --> 49:47.040]  and therefore returned my fee that I paid as a consumer, forceful consumer, back to me.
[49:47.040 --> 49:48.040]  Therefore...
[49:48.040 --> 49:49.040]  Okay.
[49:49.040 --> 49:50.040]  Okay.
[49:50.040 --> 49:51.040]  Hold on.
[49:51.040 --> 49:52.040]  Hold on.
[49:52.040 --> 49:57.040]  What does consumer mean in the state of Illinois?
[49:57.040 --> 49:58.040]  Good question.
[49:58.040 --> 50:01.040]  You don't care what it means in the Fed.
[50:01.040 --> 50:05.040]  You care what it means in the state.
[50:05.040 --> 50:06.040]  Okay.
[50:06.040 --> 50:16.040]  You were granted a service, whether you liked it or not, and you paid for that service.
[50:16.040 --> 50:21.040]  Just because you didn't contract to secure the service, you still paid for it.
[50:21.040 --> 50:26.040]  That should give you standing.
[50:26.040 --> 50:27.040]  Okay.
[50:27.040 --> 50:28.040]  I agree.
[50:28.040 --> 50:29.040]  That just makes sense, doesn't it?
[50:29.040 --> 50:33.040]  I agree.
[50:33.040 --> 50:36.040]  So what did the judge say?
[50:36.040 --> 50:39.040]  Well, I haven't looked at this case yet.
[50:39.040 --> 50:43.040]  I'm still reading through all this and trying to memorize what he's just ordered.
[50:43.040 --> 50:47.040]  But he's got some cases references here, a couple of them, like Steinberg v. Chicago,
[50:47.040 --> 50:54.040]  this and that, and that some students were not consumers is the term defined in the Act.
[50:54.040 --> 50:58.040]  And I don't know what he's meaning, but he's gone into some stuff.
[50:58.040 --> 51:01.040]  And basically, he's dismissed it without prejudice.
[51:01.040 --> 51:04.040]  Most of it's been dismissed without prejudice.
[51:04.040 --> 51:06.040]  Well, that's good.
[51:06.040 --> 51:09.040]  But here, since this was already...
[51:09.040 --> 51:11.040]  Okay.
[51:11.040 --> 51:18.040]  He must feel like this was not already determined in the state court.
[51:18.040 --> 51:23.040]  How did he address res judicata?
[51:23.040 --> 51:24.040]  Well, that's the other thing.
[51:24.040 --> 51:26.040]  He's been ignoring a lot of stuff.
[51:26.040 --> 51:30.040]  He didn't even mention it, that I've already had a judgment.
[51:30.040 --> 51:32.040]  Yeah, he didn't even mention it.
[51:32.040 --> 51:33.040]  Okay.
[51:33.040 --> 51:36.040]  That's where your objection should be.
[51:36.040 --> 51:38.040]  You should refile.
[51:38.040 --> 51:39.040]  Let's see.
[51:39.040 --> 51:40.040]  You should file...
[51:40.040 --> 51:41.040]  No, don't refile yet.
[51:41.040 --> 51:43.040]  He dismissed without prejudice.
[51:43.040 --> 51:46.040]  So you should file an appeal.
[51:46.040 --> 51:48.040]  And you get to the appeals court.
[51:48.040 --> 51:50.040]  You'll get a good workout in the appeals court.
[51:50.040 --> 51:54.040]  And if the appeals court rules against you, you can appeal to the Supreme.
[51:54.040 --> 51:58.040]  And if they rule against you, you can come back and refile.
[51:58.040 --> 51:59.040]  Well, here's the interesting thing.
[51:59.040 --> 52:01.040]  He didn't kick my suit out.
[52:01.040 --> 52:04.040]  He kept parts of it, very, very small parts of it.
[52:04.040 --> 52:05.040]  So I'm still in court.
[52:05.040 --> 52:10.040]  But he's giving me 30 days to amend some of the mistakes.
[52:10.040 --> 52:11.040]  Okay.
[52:11.040 --> 52:16.040]  So he dismissed portions of your suit without prejudice.
[52:16.040 --> 52:18.040]  Yeah, the majority of it, yeah.
[52:18.040 --> 52:19.040]  Okay.
[52:19.040 --> 52:20.040]  That's okay.
[52:20.040 --> 52:21.040]  That's good.
[52:21.040 --> 52:22.040]  That's good.
[52:22.040 --> 52:26.040]  He's telling you this is wrong and giving you an opportunity to fix it.
[52:26.040 --> 52:30.040]  Yeah, and without prejudice means you get to try again.
[52:30.040 --> 52:37.040]  So if you feel like he was incorrect, then appeal.
[52:37.040 --> 52:45.040]  And in the appeal, they will further elucidate whether he is correct or not correct.
[52:45.040 --> 52:49.040]  What are the issues he left in place?
[52:49.040 --> 52:51.040]  Well, that's the confusing part.
[52:51.040 --> 52:52.040]  I don't even want to go into that.
[52:52.040 --> 52:54.040]  That will make everybody's head spin.
[52:54.040 --> 52:57.040]  Let me ask it different.
[52:57.040 --> 53:04.040]  Did he leave issues in place that if they are ruled in your favor,
[53:04.040 --> 53:09.040]  that you will have a right to judgment in your favor?
[53:09.040 --> 53:11.040]  Yes, but that's the tricky part.
[53:11.040 --> 53:15.040]  The only way to recover damages for those specific ones is under the threshold
[53:15.040 --> 53:19.040]  of the amount that would keep me in federal court.
[53:19.040 --> 53:24.040]  There's no way I could retain damages of anything of substantial value
[53:24.040 --> 53:28.040]  without these other fraud claims.
[53:28.040 --> 53:34.040]  So that's the tricky part of this one.
[53:34.040 --> 53:43.040]  Okay, so you need to attack the failure to address res judicata.
[53:43.040 --> 53:44.040]  I do.
[53:44.040 --> 53:48.040]  I mean, this should be able to win here unless – I mean, it's clever.
[53:48.040 --> 53:52.040]  And so the second one that somebody told me is that once you have consumer fraud,
[53:52.040 --> 53:56.040]  you pretty much have fraud because the only difference between consumer fraud
[53:56.040 --> 54:01.040]  and fraud is that you actually acted on the intention and carried it out.
[54:01.040 --> 54:03.040]  Well, that's exactly what I did.
[54:03.040 --> 54:07.040]  And he went into some nuance of making a false statement.
[54:07.040 --> 54:11.040]  Well, false statements can be made by omission as well.
[54:11.040 --> 54:13.040]  And I've read that, but he's saying that that's not the case
[54:13.040 --> 54:18.040]  because it wasn't a direct statement through the signage.
[54:18.040 --> 54:22.040]  So he's playing more games here even to kick that one out.
[54:22.040 --> 54:26.040]  But he's also giving me time to amend it.
[54:26.040 --> 54:29.040]  So he's trying to stay away from fraud.
[54:29.040 --> 54:30.040]  I think he's trying to stay away from this.
[54:30.040 --> 54:33.040]  And I'll give you the last example why.
[54:33.040 --> 54:37.040]  So I also brought in some constitutional claims in here.
[54:37.040 --> 54:40.040]  Some of them weren't awesome, but a couple of them were fine.
[54:40.040 --> 54:42.040]  They should stick.
[54:42.040 --> 54:47.040]  And the problem is that I had no way to know that these were going to be –
[54:47.040 --> 54:49.040]  and most of these were going to be valid claims
[54:49.040 --> 54:53.040]  until the state actually made their ruling, which was about a year and a half later.
[54:53.040 --> 54:57.040]  Okay, so I had no idea what the laws were, what laws pertained to this.
[54:57.040 --> 54:58.040]  I knew I was wrong.
[54:58.040 --> 55:01.040]  I knew there was some torts possibly, right?
[55:01.040 --> 55:03.040]  But I had no idea what they could be.
[55:03.040 --> 55:06.040]  And the law says that for those type of claims,
[55:06.040 --> 55:08.040]  you have to have most of the elements in place
[55:08.040 --> 55:12.040]  and have knowledge of them before it starts to accrue.
[55:12.040 --> 55:16.040]  So that would mean I have three years, a little over three –
[55:16.040 --> 55:20.040]  about three years to bring a claim from the original date
[55:20.040 --> 55:24.040]  because it's a two-year statute of limitations in Illinois.
[55:24.040 --> 55:30.040]  And he just – he flat-out ignored my arguments about the medical malpractice accrual rule,
[55:30.040 --> 55:35.040]  which means when you gain knowledge of, you know, the needle that got left in you
[55:35.040 --> 55:39.040]  that's causing the infection, that's when your statute of limitations runs.
[55:39.040 --> 55:42.040]  I mean, could you use that for every accrual rule?
[55:42.040 --> 55:49.040]  And he flat-out glazed right over it, ignored it, and dismissed that specific claim with prejudice.
[55:49.040 --> 55:54.040]  Well, that's okay.
[55:54.040 --> 55:58.040]  That's the one I – I want to appeal the heck out of that one, but –
[55:58.040 --> 55:59.040]  Good.
[55:59.040 --> 56:09.040]  When you appeal, they will pretty well tell you just by the other side's arguments
[56:09.040 --> 56:17.040]  all that you need to know to take this to the Supreme and then come back and refile.
[56:17.040 --> 56:26.040]  But you really need to move in your appeal to move for the –
[56:26.040 --> 56:29.040]  that the ruling be overturned or in the alternative,
[56:29.040 --> 56:36.040]  that the ruling be – the ruling with prejudice be overturned
[56:36.040 --> 56:43.040]  and that it be ruled without prejudice so you get opportunity to fix it.
[56:43.040 --> 56:51.040]  With prejudice means there is no possible way that you can adjust this argument
[56:51.040 --> 56:54.040]  so that it could give you a positive ruling.
[56:54.040 --> 57:01.040]  It's real hard for them to maintain a dismissal with prejudice.
[57:01.040 --> 57:03.040]  For who to maintain?
[57:03.040 --> 57:12.040]  For the court to – they don't – the courts frown on dismissal with prejudice,
[57:12.040 --> 57:14.040]  and the appellate courts are not going to like that.
[57:14.040 --> 57:19.040]  They want the litigant to have an opportunity to repair anything that's wrong,
[57:19.040 --> 57:23.040]  so they tend to disfavor dismissal with prejudice,
[57:23.040 --> 57:28.040]  and very good chance you can get the court of appeals to overturn the with prejudice part
[57:28.040 --> 57:31.040]  so you can go back and fix it.
[57:31.040 --> 57:36.040]  Should I do that now or at the end of this?
[57:36.040 --> 57:43.040]  Have you received a dispositive ruling in the case?
[57:43.040 --> 57:47.040]  Has everything been – oh, so your case is still ongoing.
[57:47.040 --> 57:56.040]  So what you can do now is petition for writ of mandamus or an interlocutory appeal.
[57:56.040 --> 58:01.040]  You have a claim that has been dismissed with prejudice.
[58:01.040 --> 58:06.040]  That's grounds for interlocutory appeal.
[58:06.040 --> 58:07.040]  Okay.
[58:07.040 --> 58:13.040]  Appeal the issues that he denied interlocutory.
[58:13.040 --> 58:18.040]  Okay, we're about to go off the cliff, and then I'll quickly end this on the other side.
[58:18.040 --> 58:21.040]  Okay. Thank you.
[58:21.040 --> 58:24.040]  That was nice of him.
[58:24.040 --> 58:31.040]  It was your fault last time, so okay. We never take responsibility for our own behavior.
[58:31.040 --> 58:34.040]  I mean, after all, we're guys.
[58:34.040 --> 58:39.040]  Okay. This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain with La Radio.
[58:39.040 --> 58:42.040]  We have a full board of callers, so we'll give out the call number.
[58:42.040 --> 58:45.040]  As soon as someone drops off, a line will open up,
[58:45.040 --> 58:50.040]  and then you can call us in at 512-646-1984. We'll be right.
[58:50.040 --> 58:54.040]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.040 --> 58:57.040]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible
[58:57.040 --> 59:01.040]  and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.040 --> 59:06.040]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:06.040 --> 59:10.040]  It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes
[59:10.040 --> 59:13.040]  that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.040 --> 59:18.040]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.040 --> 59:21.040]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[59:21.040 --> 59:24.040]  clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.040 --> 59:27.040]  growing in Christ, and how to build up the Church.
[59:27.040 --> 59:30.040]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version
[59:30.040 --> 59:33.040]  and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:33.040 --> 59:40.040]  call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.040 --> 59:45.040]  That's 888-551-0102.
[59:45.040 --> 59:50.040]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:02.040 --> 01:00:06.040]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:06.040 --> 01:00:09.040]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:09.040 --> 01:00:11.040]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:11.040 --> 01:00:17.040]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:17.040 --> 01:00:19.040]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:19.040 --> 01:00:23.040]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:23.040 --> 01:00:27.040]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:27.040 --> 01:00:29.040]  So protect your rights.
[01:00:29.040 --> 01:00:33.040]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:33.040 --> 01:00:35.040]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:35.040 --> 01:00:39.040]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:00:39.040 --> 01:00:43.040]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:43.040 --> 01:00:46.040]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:46.040 --> 01:00:49.040]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[01:00:49.040 --> 01:00:52.040]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[01:00:52.040 --> 01:00:55.040]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:55.040 --> 01:01:01.040]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent.
[01:01:01.040 --> 01:01:04.040]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers,
[01:01:04.040 --> 01:01:07.040]  a common demand in the days of our Founding Fathers.
[01:01:07.040 --> 01:01:10.040]  Third party, Third Amendment? Get it?
[01:01:10.040 --> 01:01:13.040]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging,
[01:01:13.040 --> 01:01:18.040]  tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment.
[01:01:18.040 --> 01:01:22.040]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:32.040 --> 01:01:36.040]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:36.040 --> 01:01:39.040]  We guarantee you the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:39.040 --> 01:01:41.040]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:41.040 --> 01:01:47.040]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:01:47.040 --> 01:01:49.040]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:49.040 --> 01:01:53.040]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:53.040 --> 01:01:57.040]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.040 --> 01:01:59.040]  So protect your rights.
[01:01:59.040 --> 01:02:03.040]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:03.040 --> 01:02:05.040]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.040 --> 01:02:09.040]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:02:09.040 --> 01:02:13.040]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:13.040 --> 01:02:16.040]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.040 --> 01:02:22.040]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[01:02:22.040 --> 01:02:28.040]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure.
[01:02:28.040 --> 01:02:31.040]  Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it?
[01:02:31.040 --> 01:02:35.040]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security.
[01:02:35.040 --> 01:02:40.040]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[01:02:40.040 --> 01:02:44.040]  When government employees demand a peep of your privates without probable cause,
[01:02:44.040 --> 01:02:47.040]  I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:02:47.040 --> 01:02:50.040]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[01:02:50.040 --> 01:02:54.040]  and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:54.040 --> 01:03:01.040]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:25.040 --> 01:03:32.040]  I won't pay for the war with my body.
[01:03:32.040 --> 01:03:35.040]  Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money.
[01:03:35.040 --> 01:03:38.040]  I won't pay for the fun with my body.
[01:03:38.040 --> 01:03:42.040]  The plans wicked and the logic shoddy.
[01:03:42.040 --> 01:03:45.040]  Ain't gonna pay for the war with my body.
[01:03:45.040 --> 01:03:48.040]  I won't pay for the boys with my money.
[01:03:48.040 --> 01:03:52.040]  Ain't gonna pay for the kids with my body.
[01:03:52.040 --> 01:03:56.040]  The whole agenda smells funny.
[01:03:56.040 --> 01:04:02.040]  I wanna fight in a war of my own.
[01:04:02.040 --> 01:04:09.040]  That one would be less accidental.
[01:04:09.040 --> 01:04:16.040]  I wanna pay for war of my own.
[01:04:16.040 --> 01:04:23.040]  They live in glass houses so I can watch them grow old.
[01:04:23.040 --> 01:04:26.040]  I wanna fight in a war I can win.
[01:04:26.040 --> 01:04:28.040]  I can never win no one.
[01:04:28.040 --> 01:04:30.040]  Okay, we are back.
[01:04:30.040 --> 01:04:33.040]  Randy Kelton, Wet Fountain, Woonablow Radio.
[01:04:33.040 --> 01:04:36.040]  And we're talking to Chris in Colorado.
[01:04:36.040 --> 01:04:39.040]  Okay, where were we, Chris?
[01:04:39.040 --> 01:04:41.040]  We're talking about the appeal process.
[01:04:41.040 --> 01:04:46.040]  So I talked to some attorneys in this Hibbler Pro-State thing through Chicago.
[01:04:46.040 --> 01:04:49.040]  These are federal attorneys.
[01:04:49.040 --> 01:04:58.040]  And most have said if you're going to appeal, you appeal after this particular trial, so to speak,
[01:04:58.040 --> 01:05:02.040]  and then you bring it into the appeals process.
[01:05:02.040 --> 01:05:04.040]  You need to ask them about interlocutory.
[01:05:04.040 --> 01:05:11.040]  Okay, well, let me think.
[01:05:11.040 --> 01:05:24.040]  Yeah, interlocutory appeal is sometimes difficult to tell when they'll actually accept an interlocutory appeal.
[01:05:24.040 --> 01:05:29.040]  But that would be great practice work, yeah.
[01:05:29.040 --> 01:05:35.040]  Make up an interlocutory appeal and file it.
[01:05:35.040 --> 01:05:42.040]  And the worst that can happen is they can say it's not wiped yet.
[01:05:42.040 --> 01:05:43.040]  Okay.
[01:05:43.040 --> 01:05:47.040]  What about, since my goal is to drag this on as long as possible
[01:05:47.040 --> 01:05:52.040]  so they see the dollars stacking up on their side and they still want to get out,
[01:05:52.040 --> 01:05:54.040]  I mean, they know I'm committed.
[01:05:54.040 --> 01:05:58.040]  This is four years in now, so they're itching to get this out of their hands.
[01:05:58.040 --> 01:06:01.040]  And now they realize it's not getting out of the court.
[01:06:01.040 --> 01:06:05.040]  Yeah, especially if you do an interlocutory, then they're good.
[01:06:05.040 --> 01:06:10.040]  That's going to send a signal to them that you're going to give them a real fight.
[01:06:10.040 --> 01:06:17.040]  Well, what about also just making a note for record when I do my next amended complaint
[01:06:17.040 --> 01:06:25.040]  that I object to the court's ruling that this is dismissed without prejudice because of the time bar
[01:06:25.040 --> 01:06:32.040]  when my argument was not even considered and therefore I will be appealing at the end of this.
[01:06:32.040 --> 01:06:33.040]  What about that?
[01:06:33.040 --> 01:06:35.040]  Is that a statement that can be worded?
[01:06:35.040 --> 01:06:36.040]  No.
[01:06:36.040 --> 01:06:38.040]  No, that's meaningless.
[01:06:38.040 --> 01:06:41.040]  They expect you to appeal it anyway.
[01:06:41.040 --> 01:06:46.040]  Just warning the judge that you're going to appeal this, that means nothing.
[01:06:46.040 --> 01:06:53.040]  You're not asking the judge, unless you ask him for reconsideration
[01:06:53.040 --> 01:06:57.040]  and point out that he failed to address him.
[01:06:57.040 --> 01:07:06.040]  Show him, point out where you believe he ruled him properly and give him opportunity to correct it.
[01:07:06.040 --> 01:07:08.040]  Okay.
[01:07:08.040 --> 01:07:12.040]  A petition for reconsideration.
[01:07:12.040 --> 01:07:14.040]  Okay.
[01:07:14.040 --> 01:07:21.040]  And especially the issues that he failed to address completely.
[01:07:21.040 --> 01:07:26.040]  That's not something he gets to do.
[01:07:26.040 --> 01:07:31.040]  Yeah, he ignores a lot of my arguments, made up his own, took a few defendants,
[01:07:31.040 --> 01:07:36.040]  very few of the defendants, but he just made his own arguments.
[01:07:36.040 --> 01:07:38.040]  It's really strange.
[01:07:38.040 --> 01:07:46.040]  Well, accuse him of adjudicating from the bench.
[01:07:46.040 --> 01:07:49.040]  He brought issues that were not before the court.
[01:07:49.040 --> 01:07:54.040]  If the other side didn't argue him, he doesn't get to bring them up.
[01:07:54.040 --> 01:07:55.040]  Good point.
[01:07:55.040 --> 01:07:57.040]  And that was going through my head too.
[01:07:57.040 --> 01:08:00.040]  So this is the thing.
[01:08:00.040 --> 01:08:03.040]  This is almost like being pulled in a few different directions,
[01:08:03.040 --> 01:08:05.040]  which is why I'm really wondering what his intention.
[01:08:05.040 --> 01:08:09.040]  And this is the last thing I'll read to you and I'll get off.
[01:08:09.040 --> 01:08:11.040]  So back to the fraud thing.
[01:08:11.040 --> 01:08:14.040]  He was explaining why I can't use the fraud the way I did.
[01:08:14.040 --> 01:08:16.040]  And then he uses case reference.
[01:08:16.040 --> 01:08:19.040]  And in this case reference it says this, the Seventh Circuit explained,
[01:08:19.040 --> 01:08:23.040]  one foundation of law of fraud and negligent misreputation is the difference
[01:08:23.040 --> 01:08:26.040]  between an affirmative misrepresentation and failure to disclose.
[01:08:26.040 --> 01:08:30.040]  The common law tort of fraud ordinarily requires a deliberately false statement
[01:08:30.040 --> 01:08:32.040]  of material fact.
[01:08:32.040 --> 01:08:35.040]  An omission or failure to disclose, on the other hand,
[01:08:35.040 --> 01:08:37.040]  will not support a common law fraud claim,
[01:08:37.040 --> 01:08:41.040]  but may be actionable as a constructive fraud or fraudulent concealment
[01:08:41.040 --> 01:08:46.040]  if the defendant was under a particular duty to speak,
[01:08:46.040 --> 01:08:49.040]  which may stem from the fiduciary duty or similar relationship of trust
[01:08:49.040 --> 01:08:51.040]  or confidence.
[01:08:51.040 --> 01:08:54.040]  So basically he's saying that I just need to reword it.
[01:08:54.040 --> 01:08:58.040]  Plaintiff has not alleged the defendant had a fiduciary relationship with them.
[01:08:58.040 --> 01:09:01.040]  So if I alleged that they did, which they do,
[01:09:01.040 --> 01:09:05.040]  they have to put up proper signage to conform the consumer.
[01:09:05.040 --> 01:09:09.040]  Does that sound like he just told me how to rewrite that?
[01:09:09.040 --> 01:09:17.040]  Yes, and that's generally what they do.
[01:09:17.040 --> 01:09:23.040]  So if he told you what was missing, he's clearly giving you hints to how to fix it.
[01:09:23.040 --> 01:09:31.040]  He can't fix it for you, but he's pointing in the direction you need to look.
[01:09:31.040 --> 01:09:34.040]  So he wants fraud, but he doesn't want some parts of fraud.
[01:09:34.040 --> 01:09:41.040]  He wants trespass to shadows, but he doesn't want conspiracy to commit fraud.
[01:09:41.040 --> 01:09:43.040]  He's got these little things going back and forth,
[01:09:43.040 --> 01:09:50.040]  and then he certainly obviously does not want 1983 claims in here.
[01:09:50.040 --> 01:10:06.040]  So can you bring the towing company under color of law?
[01:10:06.040 --> 01:10:10.040]  That's the tricky one because yes and no.
[01:10:10.040 --> 01:10:11.040]  Hold on.
[01:10:11.040 --> 01:10:13.040]  Let me explain to everybody else why I asked that question.
[01:10:13.040 --> 01:10:15.040]  You already know.
[01:10:15.040 --> 01:10:19.040]  1983 allows you to sue a public official.
[01:10:19.040 --> 01:10:24.040]  If someone is acting in concert and collusion with a public official,
[01:10:24.040 --> 01:10:28.040]  you can generally bring them in as well.
[01:10:28.040 --> 01:10:34.040]  But in this case, you have a private company who's contracting for towing.
[01:10:34.040 --> 01:10:37.040]  They're just a contractor.
[01:10:37.040 --> 01:10:46.040]  Let's say they're ordered directly by a policeman to do something,
[01:10:46.040 --> 01:10:50.040]  and what they're ordered to do is wrongful,
[01:10:50.040 --> 01:10:58.040]  then their action becomes wrongful, but it becomes wrongful under color of law.
[01:10:58.040 --> 01:11:02.040]  If they were not ordered by a public official to do this,
[01:11:02.040 --> 01:11:07.040]  then it's going to be hard to bring them in under a 1983 claim.
[01:11:07.040 --> 01:11:09.040]  But it doesn't harm you.
[01:11:09.040 --> 01:11:13.040]  You don't need 1983 to sue them.
[01:11:13.040 --> 01:11:14.040]  No.
[01:11:14.040 --> 01:11:16.040]  They're not public officials.
[01:11:16.040 --> 01:11:18.040]  You can sue the crap out of them.
[01:11:18.040 --> 01:11:22.040]  1983 is for special circumstances when it's a public official,
[01:11:22.040 --> 01:11:25.040]  so that may be what he's towing you.
[01:11:25.040 --> 01:11:28.040]  Well, he tried to tell me that, but before I put that in there,
[01:11:28.040 --> 01:11:32.040]  I dug into this because I've heard people tell me, yeah, that's a tricky one,
[01:11:32.040 --> 01:11:35.040]  including you several times.
[01:11:35.040 --> 01:11:38.040]  But the thing is is that before a certain time,
[01:11:38.040 --> 01:11:40.040]  I don't have the date right in front of me, but I looked it up.
[01:11:40.040 --> 01:11:42.040]  There was rogue towing everywhere,
[01:11:42.040 --> 01:11:46.040]  and the towing companies were trying to use this thing like a lien process
[01:11:46.040 --> 01:11:50.040]  to justify their fees, right?
[01:11:50.040 --> 01:11:53.040]  And then people were suing them and telling they were state actors,
[01:11:53.040 --> 01:11:56.040]  and back then apparently they said, no, you're not a state actor.
[01:11:56.040 --> 01:11:59.040]  So there's actual case laws that the towing company is not a state actor.
[01:11:59.040 --> 01:12:02.040]  However, something changed along the line because there was so much
[01:12:02.040 --> 01:12:06.040]  illegality on both sides that they actually put a lien process in place
[01:12:06.040 --> 01:12:09.040]  for an automatic lien.
[01:12:09.040 --> 01:12:14.040]  When you tow a vehicle, you have an automatic possessory lien on that vehicle.
[01:12:14.040 --> 01:12:20.040]  Yeah, but that's a mechanic's lien.
[01:12:20.040 --> 01:12:21.040]  Go ahead.
[01:12:21.040 --> 01:12:23.040]  Yeah, it's like a small service lien,
[01:12:23.040 --> 01:12:25.040]  but it automatically entangles you with the state at that point,
[01:12:25.040 --> 01:12:30.040]  and so there's been some other talks in case law about that entanglement.
[01:12:30.040 --> 01:12:33.040]  So it's one of those tug-and-war things that's going on,
[01:12:33.040 --> 01:12:35.040]  and he actually mentioned that,
[01:12:35.040 --> 01:12:39.040]  so he's playing both sides of my argument in the same opinion here,
[01:12:39.040 --> 01:12:40.040]  which is interesting, what I just said.
[01:12:40.040 --> 01:12:42.040]  So he obviously knows what I'm implying,
[01:12:42.040 --> 01:12:44.040]  and I can't tell if he's hinting at me to go after it
[01:12:44.040 --> 01:12:48.040]  or he doesn't want to touch it and he wants the appellate court to touch it.
[01:12:48.040 --> 01:12:55.040]  Well, keep in mind, it is his duty to determine the facts
[01:12:55.040 --> 01:12:57.040]  in accordance with the rules of evidence,
[01:12:57.040 --> 01:13:01.040]  then apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case.
[01:13:01.040 --> 01:13:08.040]  He may not bring in law of his own, even if he knows it's there.
[01:13:08.040 --> 01:13:12.040]  It's your duty to bring him that law.
[01:13:12.040 --> 01:13:13.040]  He did?
[01:13:13.040 --> 01:13:17.040]  So he's giving you hints as to what to bring him.
[01:13:17.040 --> 01:13:22.040]  But he also put in a subnote that even if I did have a claim under 1983
[01:13:22.040 --> 01:13:24.040]  that towing company is not a state actor,
[01:13:24.040 --> 01:13:29.040]  but he also put in the lien reference, which is interesting.
[01:13:29.040 --> 01:13:32.040]  He specifically put in the lien reference.
[01:13:32.040 --> 01:13:42.040]  So he's making me a little schizoid here, but it's, you know...
[01:13:42.040 --> 01:13:43.040]  I don't know.
[01:13:43.040 --> 01:13:45.040]  I don't have the document in front of me, so I can't look at it,
[01:13:45.040 --> 01:13:50.040]  but use your best judgment.
[01:13:50.040 --> 01:13:51.040]  Well, it's a little over my head.
[01:13:51.040 --> 01:13:54.040]  I mean, this is complicated stuff, and he's obviously,
[01:13:54.040 --> 01:13:57.040]  he's either annoyed with me that I've got this into it,
[01:13:57.040 --> 01:14:00.040]  or he's actually stimulated by it.
[01:14:00.040 --> 01:14:02.040]  I can't tell.
[01:14:02.040 --> 01:14:04.040]  It sounds like he's trying to give you instruction,
[01:14:04.040 --> 01:14:07.040]  and that's what they generally do.
[01:14:07.040 --> 01:14:08.040]  Okay.
[01:14:08.040 --> 01:14:10.040]  Except for the issues he ignored,
[01:14:10.040 --> 01:14:18.040]  and those really need to be addressed with a motion for reconsideration.
[01:14:18.040 --> 01:14:19.040]  Okay.
[01:14:19.040 --> 01:14:29.040]  If he believes those weren't correct, get him to tell you why.
[01:14:29.040 --> 01:14:31.040]  You mean the things he ignored, okay.
[01:14:31.040 --> 01:14:33.040]  Yeah.
[01:14:33.040 --> 01:14:34.040]  Okay.
[01:14:34.040 --> 01:14:36.040]  And I do that in my next motion,
[01:14:36.040 --> 01:14:41.040]  or I do that in conjunction with this amended complaint?
[01:14:41.040 --> 01:14:44.040]  No, this is a motion on its own.
[01:14:44.040 --> 01:14:46.040]  Before the amended complaint,
[01:14:46.040 --> 01:14:50.040]  you file a motion for reconsideration and ask him to address these issues
[01:14:50.040 --> 01:14:53.040]  that he missed.
[01:14:53.040 --> 01:14:55.040]  Okay.
[01:14:55.040 --> 01:14:59.040]  That I should be able to put together, okay.
[01:14:59.040 --> 01:15:00.040]  Okay.
[01:15:00.040 --> 01:15:05.040]  That will put the lawyers on their toes and cost them more money.
[01:15:05.040 --> 01:15:09.040]  Yeah, well, that's the goal.
[01:15:09.040 --> 01:15:10.040]  Okay.
[01:15:10.040 --> 01:15:11.040]  Okay.
[01:15:11.040 --> 01:15:12.040]  Thank you, Randy.
[01:15:12.040 --> 01:15:13.040]  Good luck.
[01:15:13.040 --> 01:15:14.040]  Thanks, guys.
[01:15:14.040 --> 01:15:18.040]  Now we're going to go to what appears to be another first-time caller.
[01:15:18.040 --> 01:15:30.040]  Oh, it looks like he has been checked out.
[01:15:30.040 --> 01:15:36.040]  The next up would be Jill in Oregon.
[01:15:36.040 --> 01:15:38.040]  Is that a first-time caller?
[01:15:38.040 --> 01:15:39.040]  Yes.
[01:15:39.040 --> 01:15:41.040]  Oh, okay.
[01:15:41.040 --> 01:15:44.040]  Jill in Oregon.
[01:15:44.040 --> 01:15:46.040]  Ted, I see you there,
[01:15:46.040 --> 01:15:50.040]  but we will get to you and we'll give you plenty of time.
[01:15:50.040 --> 01:15:55.040]  Jill in Oregon, what do you have for us today?
[01:15:55.040 --> 01:16:00.040]  Randy, I have a long story.
[01:16:00.040 --> 01:16:03.040]  Basically, the governor's tweet here in Oregon
[01:16:03.040 --> 01:16:07.040]  set into motion a series of events that led to my termination
[01:16:07.040 --> 01:16:12.040]  and blacklisting from the entire K-12 industry.
[01:16:12.040 --> 01:16:18.040]  I'm calling to brainstorm some ideas on how I can write my pleadings
[01:16:18.040 --> 01:16:22.040]  in terms of 1983 claims
[01:16:22.040 --> 01:16:29.040]  and how I can add the insurer slash lawyer for my school in my claim.
[01:16:29.040 --> 01:16:30.040]  Okay, hold on.
[01:16:30.040 --> 01:16:31.040]  Hold on.
[01:16:31.040 --> 01:16:32.040]  Let's take a step back.
[01:16:32.040 --> 01:16:37.040]  Were you employed by a federal agency?
[01:16:37.040 --> 01:16:41.040]  I was employed by a local public school.
[01:16:41.040 --> 01:16:42.040]  Oh, okay.
[01:16:42.040 --> 01:16:48.040]  So always you want to look at the state first.
[01:16:48.040 --> 01:16:55.040]  The greatest power you have over these guys goes to money.
[01:16:55.040 --> 01:16:56.040]  Hold on.
[01:16:56.040 --> 01:16:57.040]  We're about to go to our sponsors.
[01:16:57.040 --> 01:17:00.040]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.040 --> 01:17:05.040]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.040 --> 01:17:09.040]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:17:09.040 --> 01:17:13.040]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors,
[01:17:13.040 --> 01:17:15.040]  and now you can win too.
[01:17:15.040 --> 01:17:17.040]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English
[01:17:17.040 --> 01:17:21.040]  on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:17:21.040 --> 01:17:24.040]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons,
[01:17:24.040 --> 01:17:26.040]  how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:17:26.040 --> 01:17:29.040]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[01:17:29.040 --> 01:17:34.040]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:34.040 --> 01:17:39.040]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:39.040 --> 01:17:41.040]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:41.040 --> 01:17:44.040]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:17:44.040 --> 01:17:49.040]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.040 --> 01:17:57.040]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:17:57.040 --> 01:18:00.040]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:27.040 --> 01:18:29.040]  When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts,
[01:18:29.040 --> 01:18:31.040]  the first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.040 --> 01:18:35.040]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com.
[01:18:35.040 --> 01:18:38.040]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:38.040 --> 01:18:40.040]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon,
[01:18:40.040 --> 01:18:43.040]  you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.040 --> 01:18:44.040]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.040 --> 01:18:45.040]  No.
[01:18:45.040 --> 01:18:47.040]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.040 --> 01:18:48.040]  No.
[01:18:48.040 --> 01:18:49.040]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.040 --> 01:18:50.040]  No.
[01:18:50.040 --> 01:18:51.040]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.040 --> 01:18:52.040]  Wow.
[01:18:52.040 --> 01:18:54.040]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.040 --> 01:18:56.040]  This is perfect.
[01:18:56.040 --> 01:18:57.040]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.040 --> 01:18:58.040]  We are welcome.
[01:18:58.040 --> 01:19:00.040]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:19:00.040 --> 01:19:27.040]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:27.040 --> 01:19:48.040]  Oh, the break was horrible.
[01:19:48.040 --> 01:19:52.040]  It was awful.
[01:19:52.040 --> 01:19:54.040]  Deborah was picking on me on the break.
[01:19:54.040 --> 01:19:56.040]  You guys all ought to send her emails
[01:19:56.040 --> 01:20:00.040]  and tell her to be sweet and nice to me on the breaks.
[01:20:00.040 --> 01:20:02.040]  She was actually ordering me around.
[01:20:02.040 --> 01:20:06.040]  Can you believe a woman was ordering me around?
[01:20:06.040 --> 01:20:08.040]  Move that mic away from your face.
[01:20:08.040 --> 01:20:10.040]  Try that.
[01:20:10.040 --> 01:20:11.040]  Okay.
[01:20:11.040 --> 01:20:14.040]  The mic was in my face, but I moved it.
[01:20:14.040 --> 01:20:16.040]  Okay.
[01:20:16.040 --> 01:20:18.040]  We were talking to Jill in Oregon.
[01:20:18.040 --> 01:20:19.040]  Okay.
[01:20:19.040 --> 01:20:20.040]  Go ahead, Jill.
[01:20:20.040 --> 01:20:21.040]  Okay.
[01:20:21.040 --> 01:20:25.040]  So let me go over the parties that I'm looking to sue right now.
[01:20:25.040 --> 01:20:29.040]  That would be the governor, the public health director
[01:20:29.040 --> 01:20:33.040]  of the Oregon Health Authority, which is the OHA.
[01:20:33.040 --> 01:20:34.040]  Oh, wait a minute.
[01:20:34.040 --> 01:20:39.040]  Is this about masks and COVID and all those issues?
[01:20:39.040 --> 01:20:40.040]  Yes.
[01:20:40.040 --> 01:20:41.040]  Wonderful.
[01:20:41.040 --> 01:20:44.040]  Have you looked at the criminal complaint
[01:20:44.040 --> 01:20:47.040]  that I filed against the Texas governor?
[01:20:47.040 --> 01:20:53.040]  I have read some of it, but I haven't combed through it yet.
[01:20:53.040 --> 01:20:57.040]  All of the crimes that I allege in there will...
[01:20:57.040 --> 01:21:02.040]  The only thing that will change is the numbers by other states
[01:21:02.040 --> 01:21:06.040]  when it goes to executive orders.
[01:21:06.040 --> 01:21:11.040]  So that should give you a lot to work from.
[01:21:11.040 --> 01:21:12.040]  Okay.
[01:21:12.040 --> 01:21:13.040]  Go ahead.
[01:21:13.040 --> 01:21:14.040]  Okay.
[01:21:14.040 --> 01:21:16.040]  So I have the governor.
[01:21:16.040 --> 01:21:19.040]  I have the director of public health,
[01:21:19.040 --> 01:21:24.040]  who was the one who approved their rule that led to my termination.
[01:21:24.040 --> 01:21:27.040]  I have my employer, which is the public school.
[01:21:27.040 --> 01:21:31.040]  I have the education service district.
[01:21:31.040 --> 01:21:36.040]  They are the HR subcontractor for the school.
[01:21:36.040 --> 01:21:40.040]  They are not a regulatory agency.
[01:21:40.040 --> 01:21:43.040]  They're just there to ensure compliance with state laws
[01:21:43.040 --> 01:21:48.040]  and ADA and family leave and substitute teachers and all that stuff.
[01:21:48.040 --> 01:21:51.040]  But they are a municipal corporation.
[01:21:51.040 --> 01:21:55.040]  I have the union, of which I'm not a union member.
[01:21:55.040 --> 01:21:57.040]  We'll get into that later on.
[01:21:57.040 --> 01:21:58.040]  I have...
[01:21:58.040 --> 01:22:00.040]  And I'm in help with this one.
[01:22:00.040 --> 01:22:04.040]  The OSBA, that's the Oregon School Board Association.
[01:22:04.040 --> 01:22:08.040]  They appear to be a private association,
[01:22:08.040 --> 01:22:15.040]  but they perform only essential government services.
[01:22:15.040 --> 01:22:21.040]  They are the schools and the ESD's insurer.
[01:22:21.040 --> 01:22:30.040]  And it appears that they also provide legal defense for the schools and ESD.
[01:22:30.040 --> 01:22:34.040]  Oh, and I'm probably going to sue the unemployment office as well.
[01:22:34.040 --> 01:22:39.040]  Those are the parties in my current draft pleading.
[01:22:39.040 --> 01:22:40.040]  Okay.
[01:22:40.040 --> 01:22:43.040]  Hold on.
[01:22:43.040 --> 01:22:48.040]  You have a lot of litigation here.
[01:22:48.040 --> 01:22:49.040]  Yes.
[01:22:49.040 --> 01:22:54.040]  Of all of these claims that you're bringing,
[01:22:54.040 --> 01:23:03.040]  is there a single claim or a set of claims that if you got a ruling in your favor
[01:23:03.040 --> 01:23:09.040]  would establish the rest of your claims?
[01:23:09.040 --> 01:23:14.040]  I have for sure my ADA complaint, but that would not help.
[01:23:14.040 --> 01:23:21.040]  I think my due process for termination is to slam dunk.
[01:23:21.040 --> 01:23:24.040]  What I'm thinking is you have so many litigants here,
[01:23:24.040 --> 01:23:32.040]  and if you are not an experienced litigator, it is a massive undertaking.
[01:23:32.040 --> 01:23:40.040]  So you might look at it in a way that, okay,
[01:23:40.040 --> 01:23:51.040]  you might look in Oregon law and see if they have a declaratory judgment act.
[01:23:51.040 --> 01:23:59.040]  What action was taken that if the action was improper
[01:23:59.040 --> 01:24:06.040]  would tend to establish foundation for all of your claims?
[01:24:06.040 --> 01:24:15.040]  I would say the deprivation of rights under the color of law.
[01:24:15.040 --> 01:24:20.040]  To general, who did something?
[01:24:20.040 --> 01:24:24.040]  The governor, when you go after him, he'll be hard to get.
[01:24:24.040 --> 01:24:25.040]  Right.
[01:24:25.040 --> 01:24:30.040]  It's not about law. At the end of the day, it's all about politics.
[01:24:30.040 --> 01:24:36.040]  Who is the most politically vulnerable person you could go after?
[01:24:36.040 --> 01:24:40.040]  I would say public health director.
[01:24:40.040 --> 01:24:45.040]  Probably the public health director because she was the one who approved that rule
[01:24:45.040 --> 01:24:48.040]  out of the scope of her authority,
[01:24:48.040 --> 01:24:54.040]  and there are actually full statutory prohibitions on what she did.
[01:24:54.040 --> 01:24:56.040]  Okay, that rule.
[01:24:56.040 --> 01:25:03.040]  So there is a rule that this person adopted essentially unilaterally,
[01:25:03.040 --> 01:25:15.040]  and did it have the effect of cascading the other issues that you have?
[01:25:15.040 --> 01:25:19.040]  What do you mean?
[01:25:19.040 --> 01:25:23.040]  Did others act in furtherance of this rule?
[01:25:23.040 --> 01:25:24.040]  Yes.
[01:25:24.040 --> 01:25:28.040]  Okay.
[01:25:28.040 --> 01:25:35.040]  Looking for something undermining all of what they did
[01:25:35.040 --> 01:25:39.040]  that you can get a ruling on first that will establish standing
[01:25:39.040 --> 01:25:42.040]  for the rest of your claims.
[01:25:42.040 --> 01:25:44.040]  Oh, okay.
[01:25:44.040 --> 01:25:49.040]  Make your life a lot easier if you can do a petition for declaratory judgment
[01:25:49.040 --> 01:25:53.040]  because in a petition for declaratory judgment,
[01:25:53.040 --> 01:25:57.040]  you're not making any claims against anyone,
[01:25:57.040 --> 01:26:05.040]  so a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is not appropriate.
[01:26:05.040 --> 01:26:08.040]  Get you to discovery quickly.
[01:26:08.040 --> 01:26:09.040]  Okay.
[01:26:09.040 --> 01:26:14.040]  And if you can find a key ruling that if it were ruled in your favor,
[01:26:14.040 --> 01:26:18.040]  it would establish foundation for your claims for everybody else,
[01:26:18.040 --> 01:26:20.040]  after that one first.
[01:26:20.040 --> 01:26:22.040]  Okay.
[01:26:22.040 --> 01:26:25.040]  They might not recognize what you're doing.
[01:26:25.040 --> 01:26:26.040]  Right.
[01:26:26.040 --> 01:26:29.040]  Especially if you do a declaratory judgment.
[01:26:29.040 --> 01:26:35.040]  Declaratory judgment is a relatively recent remedy introduced in law,
[01:26:35.040 --> 01:26:40.040]  and we had Tina Kohlbrook, she was going to ask her to file one
[01:26:40.040 --> 01:26:45.040]  and told her that when you file this, the lawyers are not going to know what it is,
[01:26:45.040 --> 01:26:47.040]  and they didn't.
[01:26:47.040 --> 01:26:50.040]  She filed one in Texas and a foreclosure issue,
[01:26:50.040 --> 01:26:54.040]  and the lawyer on the other side for one of the largest law firms in the country
[01:26:54.040 --> 01:26:59.040]  filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim of which cover can be had.
[01:26:59.040 --> 01:27:02.040]  Well, that can't be filed in a declaratory judgment suit,
[01:27:02.040 --> 01:27:05.040]  but the lawyer didn't understand it.
[01:27:05.040 --> 01:27:08.040]  And Judge McBride, he was a real stinker,
[01:27:08.040 --> 01:27:15.040]  he dismissed my complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim.
[01:27:15.040 --> 01:27:22.040]  If you do that with declaratory judgment, they did not understand what it was.
[01:27:22.040 --> 01:27:25.040]  That will give you a great advantage.
[01:27:25.040 --> 01:27:28.040]  Now, do I do this in federal court?
[01:27:28.040 --> 01:27:29.040]  No, no, no.
[01:27:29.040 --> 01:27:34.040]  States, I think all of the states have adopted a petition for declaratory judgment.
[01:27:34.040 --> 01:27:42.040]  What that is, is you say to the court, I think I have a claim, but I'm not certain.
[01:27:42.040 --> 01:27:51.040]  I believe this issue will be ruled this way, and if it is, then I have a claim.
[01:27:51.040 --> 01:27:58.040]  So to save both parties and the court a lot of potentially unnecessary litigation,
[01:27:58.040 --> 01:28:04.040]  I'm asking the court to give me a ruling on a point of law.
[01:28:04.040 --> 01:28:06.040]  I'm not asking for any damages.
[01:28:06.040 --> 01:28:08.040]  I'm not asking for attorney fees.
[01:28:08.040 --> 01:28:10.040]  I'm not asking for anything.
[01:28:10.040 --> 01:28:13.040]  Just give me a ruling on point of law.
[01:28:13.040 --> 01:28:18.040]  That's immune from a Rule 12, motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
[01:28:18.040 --> 01:28:21.040]  And every state has a form of that.
[01:28:21.040 --> 01:28:26.040]  There's a special kind that doesn't have a claim.
[01:28:26.040 --> 01:28:35.040]  If a pro se files a suit, the other side, after the Ickball decision,
[01:28:35.040 --> 01:28:40.040]  Ashcroft v. Ickball, or Ickball v. Ashcroft, one of those,
[01:28:40.040 --> 01:28:43.040]  they changed the pleading standards.
[01:28:43.040 --> 01:28:47.040]  And they said they didn't intend to heighten the pleading standards, but they did.
[01:28:47.040 --> 01:28:49.040]  They heightened them dramatically.
[01:28:49.040 --> 01:28:52.040]  So if a pro se files, the first thing the other side does,
[01:28:52.040 --> 01:28:55.040]  motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim,
[01:28:55.040 --> 01:29:01.040]  they essentially claim you didn't completely prove out your entire suit in the original claim.
[01:29:01.040 --> 01:29:06.040]  And if it's pro se, the judge had granted out of hand.
[01:29:06.040 --> 01:29:11.040]  But with a petition for declaratory judgment, they can't do that.
[01:29:11.040 --> 01:29:17.040]  And you get practice, highly focused issue.
[01:29:17.040 --> 01:29:20.040]  You get the other side to throw all their trash at you.
[01:29:20.040 --> 01:29:26.040]  So you get experience in the jump they're going to do,
[01:29:26.040 --> 01:29:32.040]  and it kind of warms you up for the real deal.
[01:29:32.040 --> 01:29:34.040]  Now, I have a question on this.
[01:29:34.040 --> 01:29:41.040]  So if I do this, do I serve all the expected defendants in the petition,
[01:29:41.040 --> 01:29:46.040]  or just the main, the OHA, who I think would do it?
[01:29:46.040 --> 01:29:49.040]  Just the attorney general, that's all.
[01:29:49.040 --> 01:29:51.040]  Hang on, we're about to go to our sponsors,
[01:29:51.040 --> 01:29:56.040]  Randy Kelton, Brett Felton, Ruth of La Radio.
[01:29:56.040 --> 01:29:57.040]  I'm not going to give out the call-in number yet.
[01:29:57.040 --> 01:29:59.040]  We've got a full board of callers.
[01:29:59.040 --> 01:30:02.040]  Hang on, we'll be right back.
[01:30:02.040 --> 01:30:06.040]  Sorry, soft drink lovers, even diet drinks can make you fat.
[01:30:06.040 --> 01:30:11.040]  A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff.
[01:30:11.040 --> 01:30:17.040]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas.
[01:30:17.040 --> 01:30:19.040]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:19.040 --> 01:30:22.040]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.040 --> 01:30:27.040]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.040 --> 01:30:32.040]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.040 --> 01:30:35.040]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.040 --> 01:30:38.040]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:38.040 --> 01:30:42.040]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.040 --> 01:30:46.040]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.040 --> 01:30:50.040]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right?
[01:30:50.040 --> 01:30:51.040]  Wrong.
[01:30:51.040 --> 01:30:56.040]  Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade.
[01:30:56.040 --> 01:31:03.040]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all.
[01:31:03.040 --> 01:31:06.040]  The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite,
[01:31:06.040 --> 01:31:10.040]  but unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to squelch it.
[01:31:10.040 --> 01:31:16.040]  Taking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger overall calorie intake.
[01:31:16.040 --> 01:31:19.040]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight,
[01:31:19.040 --> 01:31:24.040]  and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead.
[01:31:24.040 --> 01:31:30.040]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.040 --> 01:31:36.040]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.040 --> 01:31:38.040]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.040 --> 01:31:43.040]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.040 --> 01:31:46.040]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.040 --> 01:31:49.040]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.040 --> 01:31:50.040]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.040 --> 01:31:51.040]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.040 --> 01:31:52.040]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.040 --> 01:31:53.040]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.040 --> 01:31:55.040]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.040 --> 01:31:58.040]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.040 --> 01:32:02.040]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:02.040 --> 01:32:05.040]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:05.040 --> 01:32:08.040]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[01:32:08.040 --> 01:32:10.040]  and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:10.040 --> 01:32:13.040]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.040 --> 01:32:15.040]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:32:15.040 --> 01:32:17.040]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:17.040 --> 01:32:20.040]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.040 --> 01:32:22.040]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[01:32:22.040 --> 01:32:25.040]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:25.040 --> 01:32:28.040]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:28.040 --> 01:32:31.040]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:31.040 --> 01:32:35.040]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.040 --> 01:32:37.040]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[01:32:37.040 --> 01:32:40.040]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:40.040 --> 01:32:42.040]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:42.040 --> 01:32:45.040]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:32:45.040 --> 01:32:47.040]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[01:32:47.040 --> 01:32:50.040]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:50.040 --> 01:32:54.040]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:54.040 --> 01:33:01.040]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:24.040 --> 01:33:37.040]  Music
[01:33:37.040 --> 01:33:42.040]  The wicked come with temptations
[01:33:42.040 --> 01:33:47.040]  They're trying to buy the whole place
[01:33:47.040 --> 01:33:53.040]  They want to poison the nation
[01:33:53.040 --> 01:33:58.040]  Because they're falling from grace
[01:33:58.040 --> 01:34:04.040]  I will not drink from that cup
[01:34:04.040 --> 01:34:09.040]  I just can't act that way
[01:34:09.040 --> 01:34:14.040]  They got this problem they're dreaming of
[01:34:14.040 --> 01:34:18.040]  And I won't be the slave come what may
[01:34:18.040 --> 01:34:23.040]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio,
[01:34:23.040 --> 01:34:25.040]  and we're talking to Jill in Oregon.
[01:34:25.040 --> 01:34:30.040]  And Jill, you have an employment,
[01:34:30.040 --> 01:34:35.040]  it sounds like an employment contract issue with the state.
[01:34:35.040 --> 01:34:40.040]  And you have so many claims
[01:34:40.040 --> 01:34:45.040]  that just addressing one of these claims can get extremely complex
[01:34:45.040 --> 01:34:49.040]  and you can absolutely get buried under paperwork,
[01:34:49.040 --> 01:34:54.040]  especially if this is your first case.
[01:34:54.040 --> 01:34:59.040]  Is this the first case that you've attempted to adjudicate yourself?
[01:34:59.040 --> 01:35:01.040]  Yes.
[01:35:01.040 --> 01:35:06.040]  So you don't realize yet how complex it will be.
[01:35:06.040 --> 01:35:09.040]  But it's not something insurmountable
[01:35:09.040 --> 01:35:14.040]  because you don't have to know everything about everything all at once.
[01:35:14.040 --> 01:35:17.040]  They will bring up an issue.
[01:35:17.040 --> 01:35:24.040]  Then you have to go in and dig into that issue in detail to be able to address it.
[01:35:24.040 --> 01:35:29.040]  And when you're not experienced, you know, it takes me a lot,
[01:35:29.040 --> 01:35:36.040]  but I have massive amounts of data already in place.
[01:35:36.040 --> 01:35:41.040]  When they spoke earlier about where someone had a duty
[01:35:41.040 --> 01:35:45.040]  and Chris in Colorado,
[01:35:45.040 --> 01:35:51.040]  the judge spoke to the towing company having a duty to speak,
[01:35:51.040 --> 01:35:52.040]  and they were silent.
[01:35:52.040 --> 01:35:54.040]  Well, that goes to Twill.
[01:35:54.040 --> 01:35:56.040]  I already know that.
[01:35:56.040 --> 01:35:59.040]  I don't have to go research that out.
[01:35:59.040 --> 01:36:04.040]  I know exactly what Twill says and exactly how to use Twill.
[01:36:04.040 --> 01:36:06.040]  That takes a bit.
[01:36:06.040 --> 01:36:11.040]  When it's your first time to start out, you don't know where to go.
[01:36:11.040 --> 01:36:17.040]  And we talk about where to go, how to do these things, but it takes a bit.
[01:36:17.040 --> 01:36:26.040]  So what I was suggesting is we find a single really focused issue
[01:36:26.040 --> 01:36:35.040]  that you're saying they violated a law or a rule or a regulation.
[01:36:35.040 --> 01:36:38.040]  Let's adjudicate that law or rule or regulation.
[01:36:38.040 --> 01:36:44.040]  And you say to the court, I think that it will be ruled this way,
[01:36:44.040 --> 01:36:47.040]  and if it does, I'll have this claim, but I'm not sure.
[01:36:47.040 --> 01:36:49.040]  So before I waste the court's time,
[01:36:49.040 --> 01:36:58.040]  I want a determination based on these facts and this law whether or not I have a claim.
[01:36:58.040 --> 01:37:02.040]  Really focus to one thing, and then they throw everything you got at you,
[01:37:02.040 --> 01:37:08.040]  and you're not trying to handle half a dozen different issues all at one time
[01:37:08.040 --> 01:37:14.040]  with four or five lawyers throwing papers at you, trying to bury you under paperwork.
[01:37:14.040 --> 01:37:16.040]  Right.
[01:37:16.040 --> 01:37:20.040]  Declaratory judgment is perfect for that.
[01:37:20.040 --> 01:37:30.040]  In a declaratory judgment suit, you merely ask the judge to render a ruling on a singular point of law.
[01:37:30.040 --> 01:37:32.040]  Do not ask for any damages.
[01:37:32.040 --> 01:37:39.040]  Now, I had one guy did that, and the court awarded him attorney fees,
[01:37:39.040 --> 01:37:44.040]  and he showed me the ruling, and I said, you need to object to that ruling.
[01:37:44.040 --> 01:37:51.040]  The judge is trying to screw you, because if you allow him to award attorney fees,
[01:37:51.040 --> 01:37:56.040]  then your suit is no longer a declaratory judgment suit.
[01:37:56.040 --> 01:37:59.040]  It's a suit for damages.
[01:37:59.040 --> 01:38:10.040]  So if they try to do any kind of damages or attorney fees,
[01:38:10.040 --> 01:38:15.040]  any kind of money enter into this, you object like crazy.
[01:38:15.040 --> 01:38:19.040]  Keep it declaratory judgment, because if he rules against you,
[01:38:19.040 --> 01:38:25.040]  and it's not declaratory judgment, then you've lost your claim.
[01:38:25.040 --> 01:38:29.040]  If it's declaratory judgment and he rules against you in a declaratory judgment,
[01:38:29.040 --> 01:38:36.040]  you haven't adjudicated your claim, so you can change the argument you bring in your claim.
[01:38:36.040 --> 01:38:38.040]  You don't lose any ground.
[01:38:38.040 --> 01:38:47.040]  But the real way we win is not in the trial court.
[01:38:47.040 --> 01:38:55.040]  You should never expect to win your case in the trial court,
[01:38:55.040 --> 01:39:03.040]  because the real place to win is in the court of appeals.
[01:39:03.040 --> 01:39:11.040]  So your only purpose in the trial court is to set the record for appeal.
[01:39:11.040 --> 01:39:18.040]  And here, if you do declaratory judgment and the judge rules against you, you get to appeal it.
[01:39:18.040 --> 01:39:24.040]  You get to appeal one tiny, focused, singular issue.
[01:39:24.040 --> 01:39:29.040]  And in doing that, you'll learn how to put together an appellate document.
[01:39:29.040 --> 01:39:36.040]  You'll learn how to build tables of content and tables of authorities,
[01:39:36.040 --> 01:39:38.040]  things you've probably never heard of.
[01:39:38.040 --> 01:39:45.040]  You'll learn how to create attachments and how to bind in the attachments,
[01:39:45.040 --> 01:39:52.040]  how to produce the attachments and shrink them in PDFs so they're not too big to send to the clerk.
[01:39:52.040 --> 01:39:58.040]  There's a lot of little details that you'll learn in a declaratory judgment suit that will,
[01:39:58.040 --> 01:40:07.040]  when you get to the real suit, most of this technical stuff you've already got down.
[01:40:07.040 --> 01:40:12.040]  So you can spend your time actually taking these guys on.
[01:40:12.040 --> 01:40:17.040]  I'm talking about declaratory judgment as the short course.
[01:40:17.040 --> 01:40:20.040]  Does that make sense?
[01:40:20.040 --> 01:40:21.040]  Yeah.
[01:40:21.040 --> 01:40:35.040]  So if they, if it's in my favor, then it can go, I don't understand how it can proceed to an actual case.
[01:40:35.040 --> 01:40:47.040]  Oh, if they rule in your favor, the actual case is res judicata, means already been adjudicated.
[01:40:47.040 --> 01:40:53.040]  Then it's not a matter of whether or not you win, it's a matter of how much.
[01:40:53.040 --> 01:40:58.040]  Because once the ruling is in place, another judge cannot touch it.
[01:40:58.040 --> 01:41:05.040]  If you heard Chris early on talking about he got a ruling in his favor in the state court,
[01:41:05.040 --> 01:41:13.040]  and now the federal court's trying to change that ruling, that is a big time no-no.
[01:41:13.040 --> 01:41:23.040]  Because the ruling was already made that the towing company acted fraudulently.
[01:41:23.040 --> 01:41:28.040]  And now the trial court in the Fed is trying to say it wasn't fraud.
[01:41:28.040 --> 01:41:31.040]  It may not be fraud, doesn't make any difference.
[01:41:31.040 --> 01:41:37.040]  The state court said it was fraud, and the Feds cannot disturb that state court ruling.
[01:41:37.040 --> 01:41:41.040]  They have to act with that ruling in place.
[01:41:41.040 --> 01:41:50.040]  Everything they do has to be in concert with the res judicata, what's already been ruled.
[01:41:50.040 --> 01:41:56.040]  And that's the great thing about declaratory judgment.
[01:41:56.040 --> 01:42:00.040]  And it will cost them more money.
[01:42:00.040 --> 01:42:06.040]  Now a lawyer will never say this, and if a lawyer adjudicates a case in a way so that it costs more money,
[01:42:06.040 --> 01:42:10.040]  that's called churning and he can be sanctioned.
[01:42:10.040 --> 01:42:13.040]  But you're not a lawyer.
[01:42:13.040 --> 01:42:14.040]  Right.
[01:42:14.040 --> 01:42:18.040]  You don't care how much it costs them.
[01:42:18.040 --> 01:42:25.040]  So your first communication you get from a lawyer, you tell them don't bother me, don't talk to me,
[01:42:25.040 --> 01:42:27.040]  I didn't sue you, get lost.
[01:42:27.040 --> 01:42:30.040]  He'll send you another one bar grieving.
[01:42:30.040 --> 01:42:36.040]  That's going to give him apoplexy because it's going to cost him between 15 and 20 grand on his insurance.
[01:42:36.040 --> 01:42:40.040]  And the second one's likely to get his insurance canceled.
[01:42:40.040 --> 01:42:43.040]  So he's going to hit the road and they're going to have to hire another lawyer.
[01:42:43.040 --> 01:42:45.040]  It's going to cost them more money.
[01:42:45.040 --> 01:42:51.040]  Yeah, we can show you how to do the legal part.
[01:42:51.040 --> 01:42:57.040]  But better than that, we got tricks and traps.
[01:42:57.040 --> 01:43:06.040]  I spent a long time asking people what are the tricks and traps the lawyers use to screw over clients.
[01:43:06.040 --> 01:43:08.040]  And we've got a bunch of them.
[01:43:08.040 --> 01:43:10.040]  And we use them against them.
[01:43:10.040 --> 01:43:16.040]  And it turns out that lawyers particularly are low-hanging fruit.
[01:43:16.040 --> 01:43:19.040]  You start hammering their lawyers.
[01:43:19.040 --> 01:43:27.040]  You start asking very finely focused questions that they didn't have to research and answer.
[01:43:27.040 --> 01:43:32.040]  The cost of litigation for the other side will absolutely skyrocket.
[01:43:32.040 --> 01:43:36.040]  And then at one point you ask the judge to order mediation.
[01:43:36.040 --> 01:43:43.040]  Then they'll come to the table and they can write you a check without losing face.
[01:43:43.040 --> 01:43:46.040]  It's not like you think it is.
[01:43:46.040 --> 01:43:49.040]  It doesn't work the way they told you in high school.
[01:43:49.040 --> 01:43:51.040]  It's all about the money at the end of the day.
[01:43:51.040 --> 01:44:00.040]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Felton, we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.040 --> 01:44:04.040]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved.
[01:44:04.040 --> 01:44:06.040]  Except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.040 --> 01:44:09.040]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:44:09.040 --> 01:44:11.040]  And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.040 --> 01:44:17.040]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.040 --> 01:44:22.040]  In a world where natural fruits have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:44:22.040 --> 01:44:25.040]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.040 --> 01:44:31.040]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:31.040 --> 01:44:34.040]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much,
[01:44:34.040 --> 01:44:40.040]  we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:40.040 --> 01:44:43.040]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com,
[01:44:43.040 --> 01:44:47.040]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.040 --> 01:44:52.040]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:52.040 --> 01:44:55.040]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[01:44:55.040 --> 01:44:59.040]  help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:59.040 --> 01:45:01.040]  Order now.
[01:45:29.040 --> 01:45:34.040]  It was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.040 --> 01:45:39.040]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.040 --> 01:45:43.040]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.040 --> 01:45:49.040]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.040 --> 01:45:52.040]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.040 --> 01:45:56.040]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.040 --> 01:46:01.040]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:26.040 --> 01:46:34.040]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:34.040 --> 01:46:38.040]  Brenda Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:38.040 --> 01:46:46.040]  And on this Friday, the 27th day of May 2022,
[01:46:46.040 --> 01:46:49.040]  and we're talking to Jill in Oregon.
[01:46:49.040 --> 01:46:55.040]  And Jill, I know you want to talk about all of the things they did,
[01:46:55.040 --> 01:46:57.040]  but we're not ready yet.
[01:46:57.040 --> 01:46:59.040]  Have you written the timeline?
[01:46:59.040 --> 01:47:01.040]  Yes.
[01:47:01.040 --> 01:47:02.040]  Wonderful.
[01:47:02.040 --> 01:47:06.040]  Are you on one of our telegram channels?
[01:47:06.040 --> 01:47:07.040]  Yes.
[01:47:07.040 --> 01:47:13.040]  I'm on your Law Society, the Mass Society, and Alphonse's group.
[01:47:13.040 --> 01:47:15.040]  Who?
[01:47:15.040 --> 01:47:16.040]  Alphonse?
[01:47:16.040 --> 01:47:23.040]  Who is he?
[01:47:23.040 --> 01:47:26.040]  Yeah, we haven't had Alphonse on the show in a long time.
[01:47:26.040 --> 01:47:32.040]  We probably need to get him back and beam up a little bit.
[01:47:32.040 --> 01:47:33.040]  No free rides.
[01:47:33.040 --> 01:47:34.040]  Okay, that's good.
[01:47:34.040 --> 01:47:35.040]  That's great.
[01:47:35.040 --> 01:47:40.040]  So now I think you better understand what I'm talking about.
[01:47:40.040 --> 01:47:43.040]  Did you get your jurisdiction area?
[01:47:43.040 --> 01:47:45.040]  I did.
[01:47:45.040 --> 01:47:48.040]  Did you say you did or didn't?
[01:47:48.040 --> 01:47:51.040]  I did, but I haven't finished it yet.
[01:47:51.040 --> 01:47:58.040]  Okay, I can always tell when someone's been through jurisdiction area.
[01:47:58.040 --> 01:48:00.040]  When someone's been through jurisdiction area,
[01:48:00.040 --> 01:48:04.040]  we have a whole different conversation.
[01:48:04.040 --> 01:48:08.040]  I had a guy from Michigan, and he's telling me what went on.
[01:48:08.040 --> 01:48:11.040]  I said, well, you need to file a new auditory appeal.
[01:48:11.040 --> 01:48:13.040]  He said, I did that.
[01:48:13.040 --> 01:48:15.040]  I mentioned about three or four things.
[01:48:15.040 --> 01:48:17.040]  He said, oh, I did that.
[01:48:17.040 --> 01:48:19.040]  I said, have you been through jurisdiction area?
[01:48:19.040 --> 01:48:21.040]  He said, oh, yeah, I've been through jurisdiction area.
[01:48:21.040 --> 01:48:23.040]  So I'll be able to tell.
[01:48:23.040 --> 01:48:31.040]  And you might look at my e-book on the rule of law radio site.
[01:48:31.040 --> 01:48:32.040]  I brought that up.
[01:48:32.040 --> 01:48:36.040]  I was going to start doing some presentations from it.
[01:48:36.040 --> 01:48:40.040]  But when I was telling you that it's not like you think it is,
[01:48:40.040 --> 01:48:44.040]  I don't talk about this a whole lot on the channel.
[01:48:44.040 --> 01:48:52.040]  But nothing in law is the way that it appears.
[01:48:52.040 --> 01:48:55.040]  Yes, I'm a creature of statute.
[01:48:55.040 --> 01:49:00.040]  And I follow the law and use it religiously.
[01:49:00.040 --> 01:49:05.040]  But I fully understand that you can never expect to win your case
[01:49:05.040 --> 01:49:09.040]  simply because you have the law and the facts on your side.
[01:49:09.040 --> 01:49:13.040]  To think so is naive.
[01:49:13.040 --> 01:49:16.040]  You need the law and the facts.
[01:49:16.040 --> 01:49:23.040]  But that's just a tool you get to use to get to the real meat.
[01:49:23.040 --> 01:49:28.040]  And that is that everything's political.
[01:49:28.040 --> 01:49:31.040]  Once you understand that everything's political,
[01:49:31.040 --> 01:49:35.040]  when I say that, people hear it and they just shudder.
[01:49:35.040 --> 01:49:37.040]  It sounds horrible.
[01:49:37.040 --> 01:49:39.040]  But it's not horrible.
[01:49:39.040 --> 01:49:44.040]  It's only a problem if you don't realize that everything's political.
[01:49:44.040 --> 01:49:48.040]  Once you realize that everything is political,
[01:49:48.040 --> 01:49:55.040]  then you become the most politically powerful person in the room.
[01:49:55.040 --> 01:50:00.040]  I filed a criminal charge against the governor.
[01:50:00.040 --> 01:50:06.040]  And I also filed it with a grand jury in Travis County.
[01:50:06.040 --> 01:50:12.040]  And I wanted to file it with a magistrate.
[01:50:12.040 --> 01:50:17.040]  So I filed it with the Chief Justice of the Supreme.
[01:50:17.040 --> 01:50:19.040]  I can do that.
[01:50:19.040 --> 01:50:24.040]  I can do that because I'm a citizen in a republic,
[01:50:24.040 --> 01:50:28.040]  and that guy works for me.
[01:50:28.040 --> 01:50:31.040]  That's the judge that answers to me.
[01:50:31.040 --> 01:50:35.040]  Everybody else essentially answers to him.
[01:50:35.040 --> 01:50:38.040]  But he answers to me.
[01:50:38.040 --> 01:50:42.040]  And I filed a complaint with him, and he did not issue a warrant.
[01:50:42.040 --> 01:50:45.040]  I'm going to sue him personally.
[01:50:45.040 --> 01:50:53.040]  Chief Justice, the only ones who can do that are citizens.
[01:50:53.040 --> 01:50:55.040]  You are the most powerful person in the room.
[01:50:55.040 --> 01:50:58.040]  And once you understand the politics, you can bargain with them.
[01:50:58.040 --> 01:51:01.040]  You can judicial conduct complaint the judge.
[01:51:01.040 --> 01:51:06.040]  You can file professional conduct complaints against police officers.
[01:51:06.040 --> 01:51:13.040]  You can just hammer them big time, and they can't do anything back.
[01:51:13.040 --> 01:51:17.040]  You can ruin their careers, and there's nothing to do about it.
[01:51:17.040 --> 01:51:21.040]  Now, it's not my purpose to ruin people's careers.
[01:51:21.040 --> 01:51:28.040]  But when you go into this, you need to understand where the action is really at.
[01:51:28.040 --> 01:51:32.040]  And a good place to get a start is this jurisdiction.
[01:51:32.040 --> 01:51:35.040]  I'm sorry, Declaration of Judgment suit.
[01:51:35.040 --> 01:51:37.040]  And we'll help you on the channel.
[01:51:37.040 --> 01:51:40.040]  You've got lots of people there that can help.
[01:51:40.040 --> 01:51:42.040]  Okay, we've got a timeline.
[01:51:42.040 --> 01:51:45.040]  Can you send me the timeline?
[01:51:45.040 --> 01:51:50.040]  Yes, Randy at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:51:50.040 --> 01:51:51.040]  Yes.
[01:51:51.040 --> 01:51:54.040]  Once I've looked at the timeline, then next week call in,
[01:51:54.040 --> 01:51:57.040]  and we can have a whole different conversation.
[01:51:57.040 --> 01:51:58.040]  Then I can look more.
[01:51:58.040 --> 01:52:08.040]  I can go through it and try to pick out the key legal issues relative to your circumstance.
[01:52:08.040 --> 01:52:10.040]  And then we will look through them
[01:52:10.040 --> 01:52:14.040]  and see which ones would make the best petitions for declaratory judgment.
[01:52:14.040 --> 01:52:19.040]  You can ask for more judgments than one in one filing.
[01:52:19.040 --> 01:52:27.040]  And so you get one ruling in your favor, it's all over, guys.
[01:52:27.040 --> 01:52:32.040]  Okay, get me that timeline and call in next week.
[01:52:32.040 --> 01:52:39.040]  Do you want me to add my potential causes of action to that as well, my ideas?
[01:52:39.040 --> 01:52:41.040]  Okay, go ahead.
[01:52:41.040 --> 01:52:45.040]  You have ideas about causes of action?
[01:52:45.040 --> 01:52:46.040]  Yes.
[01:52:46.040 --> 01:52:47.040]  Okay.
[01:52:47.040 --> 01:52:54.040]  Well, she's asking you, would you like her to include in this email,
[01:52:54.040 --> 01:52:57.040]  include her potential causes of action?
[01:52:57.040 --> 01:52:59.040]  No.
[01:52:59.040 --> 01:53:00.040]  Okay.
[01:53:00.040 --> 01:53:03.040]  This is a process.
[01:53:03.040 --> 01:53:09.040]  We build the timeline first, and we won't use that in court at all.
[01:53:09.040 --> 01:53:15.040]  Once we have the timeline built, then the next thing we do is our argument and support.
[01:53:15.040 --> 01:53:18.040]  You know, everybody wants to tell their whole story.
[01:53:18.040 --> 01:53:21.040]  Well, here we tell the whole story.
[01:53:21.040 --> 01:53:23.040]  Now, this won't be the first thing in your lawsuit.
[01:53:23.040 --> 01:53:26.040]  It'll be about the third or fourth thing down.
[01:53:26.040 --> 01:53:30.040]  But you build the whole story.
[01:53:30.040 --> 01:53:34.040]  They did this, and because they did this, I have these claims.
[01:53:34.040 --> 01:53:36.040]  You put everything in it.
[01:53:36.040 --> 01:53:42.040]  Now, from that, we look at that and look at the potential claims you have.
[01:53:42.040 --> 01:53:49.040]  You're going to have more potential claims than you can possibly adjudicate.
[01:53:49.040 --> 01:53:51.040]  It's just the way it works.
[01:53:51.040 --> 01:53:56.040]  So you look at all of the claims you have and then decide,
[01:53:56.040 --> 01:54:05.040]  how do we select those claims that all have the appearance of adding one to the other?
[01:54:05.040 --> 01:54:09.040]  There will be claims that don't seem associated with anything.
[01:54:09.040 --> 01:54:20.040]  We want to pull all of those claims that makes it look like all of this was part of a concerted wrongful effort
[01:54:20.040 --> 01:54:28.040]  so that all of the claims we bring, each first claim supports the next and supports the next.
[01:54:28.040 --> 01:54:30.040]  So it leads logically.
[01:54:30.040 --> 01:54:37.040]  So a reader reads it, and he can stitch all these pieces together as he reads through it.
[01:54:37.040 --> 01:54:51.040]  Then from all of the claims, we extract causes of action and tort claims.
[01:54:51.040 --> 01:54:53.040]  I'm sorry, I didn't say that right.
[01:54:53.040 --> 01:54:58.040]  In our argument, we just put down everything they did wrong.
[01:54:58.040 --> 01:55:04.040]  And then from those, we decide what claims and causes of action.
[01:55:04.040 --> 01:55:09.040]  Then we pick only those that fit our storyline.
[01:55:09.040 --> 01:55:12.040]  And then the last thing we do is a statement of facts.
[01:55:12.040 --> 01:55:23.040]  Well, the next thing, we pick those facts that would lead a reasonable person of ordinary prudence
[01:55:23.040 --> 01:55:27.040]  to the conclusions you want them to come to.
[01:55:27.040 --> 01:55:33.040]  In the statement of facts, you don't use any conclusionary language
[01:55:33.040 --> 01:55:37.040]  like he improperly did this.
[01:55:37.040 --> 01:55:39.040]  No, no, you just say he did this.
[01:55:39.040 --> 01:55:40.040]  Okay.
[01:55:40.040 --> 01:55:46.040]  But you stick those things together because the first thing you're going to do
[01:55:46.040 --> 01:55:51.040]  and the last thing you're going to write is an introduction.
[01:55:51.040 --> 01:56:01.040]  Once you have all your facts down, then once you have your argument and support finished
[01:56:01.040 --> 01:56:06.040]  and you've taken out all of the issues you're not going to address,
[01:56:06.040 --> 01:56:09.040]  now you've got all of the things you're going to speak to.
[01:56:09.040 --> 01:56:17.040]  Then you go up and create a statement of facts that will tend to cause a reasonable person
[01:56:17.040 --> 01:56:22.040]  of ordinary prudence to stitch these facts together in a way
[01:56:22.040 --> 01:56:29.040]  so that they will come to the conclusions that you came to in your argument and support.
[01:56:29.040 --> 01:56:39.040]  Once you get that done, then you create an introduction and you say this is what I will prove.
[01:56:39.040 --> 01:56:49.040]  So now you're telling the reader the context from which to construe the facts that you're giving them.
[01:56:49.040 --> 01:56:55.040]  So the reader will read it from the context of your introduction.
[01:56:55.040 --> 01:56:59.040]  And primarily this is written for the judge.
[01:56:59.040 --> 01:57:04.040]  The judge may not agree with all of your issues,
[01:57:04.040 --> 01:57:08.040]  but you want him to be able to stitch the facts together
[01:57:08.040 --> 01:57:15.040]  and be able to see and understand how you came to the conclusions you came to.
[01:57:15.040 --> 01:57:20.040]  If he reads those facts and then he goes down to the argument and support
[01:57:20.040 --> 01:57:28.040]  and you add law to the facts and show how these facts lead to a specific conclusion,
[01:57:28.040 --> 01:57:34.040]  and it's the conclusion he came to from the facts, he's going to trust you.
[01:57:34.040 --> 01:57:38.040]  That's something that happens outside of conscious awareness.
[01:57:38.040 --> 01:57:49.040]  But if you think like he thinks, he's going to tend to trust you because he trusts him.
[01:57:49.040 --> 01:57:54.040]  My primary study is not law, it's psychology.
[01:57:54.040 --> 01:58:05.040]  And this is a method that I have developed to lead the mind from the introduction to the prayer.
[01:58:05.040 --> 01:58:08.040]  And we'll walk you through each of these steps.
[01:58:08.040 --> 01:58:14.040]  It's much easier to do it with a petition for declaratory judgment because you've only got one issue.
[01:58:14.040 --> 01:58:19.040]  So each of these parts will be much smaller and much easier to do.
[01:58:19.040 --> 01:58:26.040]  And then when you get to the real deal, you'll give these guys something to deal with.
[01:58:26.040 --> 01:58:33.040]  You saw my complaint against the governors, 150 pages.
[01:58:33.040 --> 01:58:40.040]  But it's 150 pages of small issues stitched together, one after the other.
[01:58:40.040 --> 01:58:45.040]  I did that just exactly the way I'm suggesting you do this one.
[01:58:45.040 --> 01:58:50.040]  Hang on, go into our sponsors, we'll be right back.
[01:58:50.040 --> 01:58:54.040]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[01:58:54.040 --> 01:58:58.040]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.040 --> 01:59:02.040]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[01:59:02.040 --> 01:59:07.040]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:07.040 --> 01:59:10.040]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:10.040 --> 01:59:13.040]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[01:59:13.040 --> 01:59:18.040]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.040 --> 01:59:22.040]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[01:59:22.040 --> 01:59:28.040]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.040 --> 01:59:33.040]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.040 --> 01:59:44.040]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:44.040 --> 01:59:48.040]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:48.040 --> 01:59:51.040]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:51.040 --> 02:00:03.040]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.