[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.500 --> 00:09.500] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.500 --> 00:11.000] Our liberty depends on it. [00:11.000 --> 00:16.500] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights. [00:16.500 --> 00:18.500] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.500 --> 00:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.000 --> 00:26.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:26.500 --> 00:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.000 --> 00:34.500] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:34.500 --> 00:38.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [00:38.000 --> 00:42.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.000 --> 00:45.500] Start over with Startpage. [00:45.500 --> 00:47.500] Spar, it's what fighters do. [00:47.500 --> 00:51.000] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:51.000 --> 00:54.000] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:54.000 --> 00:56.500] Spar with an extra P. [00:56.500 --> 01:03.000] S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion. [01:03.000 --> 01:08.500] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion. [01:08.500 --> 01:10.500] But petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.500 --> 01:14.500] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.500 --> 01:17.500] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, [01:17.500 --> 01:21.000] we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:21.000 --> 01:26.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.000 --> 01:34.500] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:34.500 --> 01:38.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:38.000 --> 01:39.500] Our liberty depends on it. [01:39.500 --> 01:43.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way [01:43.000 --> 01:46.000] to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:46.000 --> 01:48.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:48.000 --> 01:51.500] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:51.500 --> 01:56.500] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [01:56.500 --> 01:58.000] So protect your rights. [01:58.000 --> 02:01.500] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.500 --> 02:04.000] Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. [02:04.000 --> 02:08.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [02:08.000 --> 02:12.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.000 --> 02:15.500] Start over with StartPage. [02:15.500 --> 02:19.500] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms [02:19.500 --> 02:22.000] around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:22.000 --> 02:26.000] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, [02:26.000 --> 02:30.000] arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:30.000 --> 02:33.500] Get it? Two arms? Bear hug? Bear arms? [02:33.500 --> 02:37.500] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well [02:37.500 --> 02:38.500] when he said, [02:38.500 --> 02:43.500] The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, [02:43.500 --> 02:47.500] one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, [02:47.500 --> 02:51.000] but which historically has proved to always be possible. [02:51.000 --> 03:17.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:17.000 --> 03:21.000] Well, I received my remedy today. [03:21.000 --> 03:28.000] It came in a box just like the thing I accepted for value right away. [03:28.000 --> 03:32.000] It's not true, not later. [03:32.000 --> 03:39.000] We are originators and the pathway seems to get straighter every day. [03:39.000 --> 03:47.000] And I can take anything that belongs to me and put it to good use. [03:47.000 --> 03:54.000] While I was good for the gander, going to work for the goose. [03:54.000 --> 04:00.000] I know some content, I know some engine. [04:00.000 --> 04:04.000] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Greenblow Radio. [04:04.000 --> 04:07.000] And we're talking to Nancy in Pennsylvania. [04:07.000 --> 04:12.000] You have an issue that's not exactly a court case. [04:12.000 --> 04:17.000] It's not like you have two parties. [04:17.000 --> 04:23.000] What is actually going on with your issue so we can understand how to address this? [04:23.000 --> 04:31.000] Yeah, I'm following Alphonse with the property tax issue. [04:31.000 --> 04:43.000] So I had to request records and I got a letter full of lies from the, [04:43.000 --> 04:53.000] it was a lawyer who I would say is the underling of the person that I addressed the request to. [04:53.000 --> 05:04.000] So I bar grieved for rule, I think it was 5.4.1, truthfulness to others, which he violated. [05:04.000 --> 05:15.000] And I also bar grieved the supervisor for allowing his underling to state untruths. [05:15.000 --> 05:22.000] And then I sent a copy to the other partners in the firm. [05:22.000 --> 05:28.000] So I mean, you know, the bar grievances were sent to the judicial commission, you know, [05:28.000 --> 05:31.000] and I just sent copies to the firm. [05:31.000 --> 05:35.000] And then they broke more laws as well. [05:35.000 --> 05:43.000] So two weeks later I filed another bar grievance in the same way. [05:43.000 --> 05:54.000] So now I'm just wondering, you know, like I could file another bar grievance against the partners that I noticed, [05:54.000 --> 06:04.000] but that would mean because if they break the rule of not reporting their awareness [06:04.000 --> 06:09.000] that one of their peers has violated a code. [06:09.000 --> 06:16.000] But I'm not, you know, how would I know whether they reported or not? [06:16.000 --> 06:24.000] You could ask them to give you notice about when they reported this lawyer. [06:24.000 --> 06:29.000] And then if you don't get that notice, which you certainly won't, [06:29.000 --> 06:35.000] that will give you reasonable probable cause to believe that they didn't do what you asked them to [06:35.000 --> 06:40.000] or what they were supposed to. So agree with me again. [06:40.000 --> 06:44.000] But you understand there are consequences to what you're doing. [06:44.000 --> 06:45.000] Yeah. [06:45.000 --> 06:50.000] There is a very good chance you're not going to get a Christmas card this year. [06:50.000 --> 06:53.000] Right. Yeah, you warned me about that before. [06:53.000 --> 07:01.000] And I hardly got any Christmas cards last year, so I know I'm on the crap list. [07:01.000 --> 07:12.000] Have they been any more cooperative over your issues after you started that bar grievance? [07:12.000 --> 07:19.000] Well, I just started. So, you know, this is, as Alphonse does, you're going to have to go to court [07:19.000 --> 07:28.000] because you're trying to get the shysters to stop taxing your shelter, and that's going to be a fight. [07:28.000 --> 07:33.000] So I'm just hoping to put the pressure on, you know, to get them to back off. [07:33.000 --> 07:40.000] And that's also why I filed the criminal complaint in my town because of the superintendent [07:40.000 --> 07:47.000] and school board president that tried to have me arrested for not wearing a mask last August. [07:47.000 --> 07:53.000] So, you know, I'm just creating a crap show, as, you know, Alphonse would say. [07:53.000 --> 07:59.000] And so I have the pencil now for lawsuits. [07:59.000 --> 08:04.000] I could use another one. I mean, I could start. [08:04.000 --> 08:13.000] Another one concerns my husband's employer who had that crazy COVID policy, [08:13.000 --> 08:17.000] but they rescinded it, but not without harassing my husband. [08:17.000 --> 08:23.000] And, you know, so there's another court case I could start. [08:23.000 --> 08:30.000] And then the first one would be the ticket, you know, the citation that I got last year. [08:30.000 --> 08:39.000] I mean, I got rid of it, but, you know, my rights were violated, my inalienable rights. [08:39.000 --> 08:45.000] In all four cases, inalienable rights were violated. [08:45.000 --> 08:51.000] So with the citation case, that's six hours away. [08:51.000 --> 08:56.000] And I'm thinking, how am I going to conduct a lawsuit? [08:56.000 --> 09:00.000] And the jurisdiction is six hours from here. [09:00.000 --> 09:05.000] Well, right now most courts are holding virtual courts. [09:05.000 --> 09:13.000] And you want to object to all oral arguments. [09:13.000 --> 09:18.000] As oral arguments would be patently unfair for a pro se, [09:18.000 --> 09:24.000] move the court to rule on the documentation. [09:24.000 --> 09:30.000] Any time they want you to come to where they're at, file an objection to it, [09:30.000 --> 09:37.000] and demand that the court make its ruling on the documentation. [09:37.000 --> 09:45.000] All right, and if you make your pleadings really airtight, then hopefully that settles it fast. [09:45.000 --> 09:49.000] Yeah, and, you know, for the most part they're municipal courts. [09:49.000 --> 09:56.000] They're, you know, it's just an assembly line. [09:56.000 --> 10:00.000] They just turn the crank and push out the money. [10:00.000 --> 10:04.000] When someone comes along and screws up everything, [10:04.000 --> 10:08.000] they don't know what to do about it and they screw it all up. [10:08.000 --> 10:13.000] But pick your fights careful. [10:13.000 --> 10:16.000] What do you want to do with this ticket? [10:16.000 --> 10:18.000] Do you want to prove something? [10:18.000 --> 10:23.000] Do you want to change the system or do you want the ticket to go away? [10:23.000 --> 10:26.000] What do you want from it? [10:26.000 --> 10:36.000] Oh, ideally, you know, this whole fight is to try to help this country save itself, you know, [10:36.000 --> 10:42.000] holding public officials accountable. [10:42.000 --> 10:48.000] Okay, well, I'll point to this, and Brett and I talk about this on occasion. [10:48.000 --> 10:57.000] Pick your fights really careful because you can get more fights than you can keep up with. [10:57.000 --> 11:06.000] The problem is not finding a fight to have, but picking the one that suits your purpose the most. [11:06.000 --> 11:08.000] Okay. [11:08.000 --> 11:13.000] And the most fun part, the best way to do it is to set them up. [11:13.000 --> 11:20.000] If the ones you want to go after, if you don't have a fight, you can go down and pick one with them. [11:20.000 --> 11:24.000] Best fight to have is the one you picked. [11:24.000 --> 11:26.000] Then everybody's responding to you. [11:26.000 --> 11:28.000] You're the plaintiff. [11:28.000 --> 11:30.000] You lead. [11:30.000 --> 11:35.000] Everybody else has to respond to you. [11:35.000 --> 11:41.000] So at the end of the day, what do you want to accomplish? [11:41.000 --> 11:46.000] And what is your plan to reach that outcome? [11:46.000 --> 11:48.000] Yeah. [11:48.000 --> 11:52.000] Let me explain why I'm asking that that way. [11:52.000 --> 11:57.000] If you don't know where you're going, there's a good chance you're going to wind up somewhere else. [11:57.000 --> 12:00.000] So you have to have a goal at the end of the day. [12:00.000 --> 12:03.000] I do this. I have a goal. [12:03.000 --> 12:10.000] It is my purpose to put every judge in the country in a position such that [12:10.000 --> 12:16.000] when he steps out up behind the bench and looks out across the bar at the gallery, [12:16.000 --> 12:19.000] I want him wondering, which one? [12:19.000 --> 12:23.000] Which one of those scoundrels out there are waiting for me to render a ruling [12:23.000 --> 12:30.000] so he can run down to the district attorney and file criminal charges against me? [12:30.000 --> 12:32.000] Who was it? [12:32.000 --> 12:38.000] Thomas Jefferson said that when the people fear the government, there is tyranny. [12:38.000 --> 12:42.000] When the government fears the people, there is liberty. [12:42.000 --> 12:45.000] So that's my purpose. [12:45.000 --> 12:50.000] Always what I do is weighed against that purpose. [12:50.000 --> 12:53.000] I had a bait that dragged me out of the court one day [12:53.000 --> 12:56.000] when I filed criminal charges against the district attorney, [12:56.000 --> 13:00.000] shoved me out the door, knocked me down, broke my elbow. [13:00.000 --> 13:06.000] Now, he didn't mean to knock me down because he gave me a push just as my foot hit a carpet [13:06.000 --> 13:10.000] and there were people to clean your feet on, and that carpet went out from under me [13:10.000 --> 13:12.000] and I fell down backwards. [13:12.000 --> 13:16.000] So he didn't mean to knock me down, break my elbow, but he did. [13:16.000 --> 13:20.000] And I could have went after him. I could have sued him for that. [13:20.000 --> 13:32.000] But I looked at it and I thought, okay, how can I use this to move me toward my intended ultimate outcome? [13:32.000 --> 13:38.000] And there was no way I could frame suing Dick Woods [13:38.000 --> 13:46.000] that would lead me toward my intended outcome of getting the judges to follow the law. [13:46.000 --> 13:49.000] So I didn't sue Dick Woods. [13:49.000 --> 13:54.000] It turned out to be the single most powerful thing I'd ever done at that courthouse [13:54.000 --> 13:58.000] because that's when they realized I wasn't the real deal, [13:58.000 --> 14:05.000] that I wasn't down here just trying to cause trouble, that I was trying to achieve an outcome. [14:05.000 --> 14:12.000] So, Nancy, what is your intended outcome? [14:12.000 --> 14:24.000] Well, I'd like them to stop taxing my property. [14:24.000 --> 14:36.000] I mean, I could drop the traffic citation one because it went away and I can't do so much in a day. [14:36.000 --> 14:47.000] But, I mean, they all involve violations of inalienable rights, which are ruining this country. [14:47.000 --> 14:55.000] So, you know, they all have importance. But, you know, if I had to choose one, [14:55.000 --> 15:03.000] it would be to get the tax shysters off from taxing my property. [15:03.000 --> 15:10.000] Okay. Focus on that one. And they will do all kinds of stuff. [15:10.000 --> 15:17.000] They'll give you opportunity to have all kinds of fights. [15:17.000 --> 15:21.000] It's like dragging a red herring across the trail. [15:21.000 --> 15:29.000] They're trying to lead you off and distract you and keep you in so many fights that you wind up being ineffectual. [15:29.000 --> 15:31.000] Right. [15:31.000 --> 15:35.000] Figure out what you want. Stay with it. [15:35.000 --> 15:40.000] There's nothing worse than someone that will just keep coming. [15:40.000 --> 15:44.000] You can't distract them. You can't fight them. They just keep coming at you. [15:44.000 --> 15:47.000] There's a book, The Fountainhead, by Ayn Rand. [15:47.000 --> 15:54.000] And in there, it starts out with this guy trying to kill a architect. [15:54.000 --> 15:58.000] What do you call it, Brett, when they evaluate stuff? [15:58.000 --> 16:01.000] Like the guys that talk about them. [16:01.000 --> 16:05.000] Oh, critics, movie critics. [16:05.000 --> 16:09.000] And it wasn't until the end of the movie that he explained why he did that. [16:09.000 --> 16:15.000] He says, imagine you're in a room with a crazed maniac and his brain's eaten out. [16:15.000 --> 16:18.000] And you know he wants to hurt you. [16:18.000 --> 16:24.000] And you can make the most eloquent arguments and give the most convincing reasons as to why he shouldn't hurt you. [16:24.000 --> 16:28.000] But he just can't hear you. It just doesn't make any difference. [16:28.000 --> 16:32.000] Nothing you do will make any difference. [16:32.000 --> 16:37.000] You want to be that crazed maniac with the brain eaten out. [16:37.000 --> 16:41.000] You want to be laser focused on an outcome. [16:41.000 --> 16:45.000] Let them do nothing to lead you away from your outcome. [16:45.000 --> 16:48.000] That's when you become powerful. [16:48.000 --> 16:52.000] Talk to Alphonse. That's what he does. [16:52.000 --> 16:58.000] Stay focused. Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll do the radio. We'll be right back. [17:22.000 --> 17:29.000] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [17:29.000 --> 17:34.000] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [17:34.000 --> 17:39.000] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [17:39.000 --> 17:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [17:41.000 --> 17:47.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner. [17:47.000 --> 17:50.000] Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [17:50.000 --> 18:01.000] Ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [18:01.000 --> 18:05.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [18:05.000 --> 18:07.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [18:07.000 --> 18:12.000] And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [18:12.000 --> 18:17.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, [18:17.000 --> 18:20.000] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [18:20.000 --> 18:25.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [18:25.000 --> 18:31.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [18:31.000 --> 18:35.000] that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [18:35.000 --> 18:40.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [18:40.000 --> 18:45.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [18:45.000 --> 18:50.000] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [18:50.000 --> 18:54.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [18:54.000 --> 19:00.000] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [19:00.000 --> 19:15.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, www.logosradionetwork.com [19:15.000 --> 19:30.000] The Logos Radio Network is a production of the National Television and Radio Network of the United States of America. [19:30.000 --> 19:45.000] Thank you very much. [20:00.000 --> 20:15.000] Thank you. [20:15.000 --> 20:30.000] Thank you. [20:30.000 --> 20:33.000] Okay, we are back. [20:33.000 --> 20:38.000] Randy Felton, Fountain Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Nancy in Pennsylvania. [20:38.000 --> 20:42.000] And I'll get off my soapbox now. [20:42.000 --> 20:46.000] I was preaching the gospel according to Randy. [20:46.000 --> 20:50.000] So what do you think, Nancy? [20:50.000 --> 20:57.000] Well, the other case concerning my husband's employer is important too, [20:57.000 --> 21:10.000] because they won't recognize an inalienable right to freedom of conscience and bodily autonomy. [21:10.000 --> 21:16.000] I mean, they've rescinded their policy, but they're still threatening that if, you know, OSHA says they have to do this, [21:16.000 --> 21:20.000] then you're going to have to get your shot or be fired, you know. [21:20.000 --> 21:26.000] It's just unbelievable, so what we're dealing with. [21:26.000 --> 21:30.000] What I'm saying is focus, focus, focus, focus. [21:30.000 --> 21:37.000] You can probably take on two issues at a time, but there is so much inequity out there [21:37.000 --> 21:42.000] that you can find more issues to take on than you can get to. [21:42.000 --> 21:45.000] And be careful of the issues you take on. [21:45.000 --> 21:47.000] You know, this is your husband's employment. [21:47.000 --> 21:51.000] How important is that? [21:51.000 --> 21:56.000] The reason I ask is, you know, I'm an older guy. [21:56.000 --> 21:59.000] I am essentially retired. [21:59.000 --> 22:00.000] My house is paid for. [22:00.000 --> 22:02.000] My car is paid for. [22:02.000 --> 22:05.000] I don't owe anybody anything. [22:05.000 --> 22:07.000] And my kids are grown. [22:07.000 --> 22:09.000] I fulfill my contract with life. [22:09.000 --> 22:16.000] I can go out there and have these fights, but someone who has a couple of kids they're trying to raise [22:16.000 --> 22:22.000] and got two car payments, a house payment, they're buried already, [22:22.000 --> 22:26.000] you can't take on these fights and you don't need to. [22:26.000 --> 22:31.000] The American Revolution was won by 3% of the population. [22:31.000 --> 22:33.000] Yeah. [22:33.000 --> 22:38.000] If we can engage those 3%, we can win this back. [22:38.000 --> 22:48.000] But if you take on more than you can handle, you wind up totally ineffective in all areas. [22:48.000 --> 22:49.000] Right. [22:49.000 --> 22:55.000] Well, it's something that requires prayer to discern. [22:55.000 --> 22:59.000] You know, I'm in a position where my children are grown, [22:59.000 --> 23:03.000] so I don't have that vulnerability. [23:03.000 --> 23:12.000] And not a lot of people can have the opportunity now to work full time on this endeavor. [23:12.000 --> 23:16.000] So am I that 3%, you know, that needs to stand up? [23:16.000 --> 23:22.000] I mean, that's a question between me and my husband and our maker, you know. [23:22.000 --> 23:27.000] So it's just unbelievable what we're dealing with. [23:27.000 --> 23:32.000] Because, you know, if they say that they can tell you what to put in your body, [23:32.000 --> 23:35.000] what kind of life are we going to be having? [23:35.000 --> 23:41.000] What kind of life am I going to lead for the next generation, you know? [23:41.000 --> 23:45.000] You're exactly part of the 3% we're looking for. [23:45.000 --> 23:46.000] Yeah. [23:46.000 --> 23:52.000] But we need to make sure that you don't get in over your head and get burned out. [23:52.000 --> 23:53.000] Right. [23:53.000 --> 23:57.000] And, of course, you know, when you're taking jurisdictionary, you find, like, you read, [23:57.000 --> 24:03.000] or even, you know, just listening to other people talk about if you write a pleading, [24:03.000 --> 24:07.000] that's really tight and no wiggle room. [24:07.000 --> 24:16.000] You know, you can end the case through once you get into discovery for production [24:16.000 --> 24:21.000] and requests for production and most, you know, admissions. [24:21.000 --> 24:26.000] You know, you can end up shutting, closing the case real fast, you know? [24:26.000 --> 24:33.000] So that's what I shoot for, to create a complaint that is so airtight [24:33.000 --> 24:39.000] that there's no wiggle room and they're going to want to settle. [24:39.000 --> 24:41.000] So... [24:41.000 --> 24:46.000] You got, you sound like you have your head on right. [24:46.000 --> 24:50.000] Don't expect to win at the end of the day in the trial court. [24:50.000 --> 24:56.000] The way we win is bring the other side to the table and get them to go out and check. [24:56.000 --> 24:57.000] Yeah. [24:57.000 --> 25:02.000] Okay, okay, it's not about the money, but the money is how they keep score. [25:02.000 --> 25:05.000] And it's about keeping score. [25:05.000 --> 25:08.000] It's about stinging them. [25:08.000 --> 25:11.000] And the best place to sting them is in their pocket. [25:11.000 --> 25:19.000] And that has an added benefit because it helps bankroll other fights. [25:19.000 --> 25:23.000] We have a lot of people that, you know, they expect to, [25:23.000 --> 25:27.000] if they have the right argument and they have the law on their side, [25:27.000 --> 25:32.000] they have this expectation that they will win at the end of the day. [25:32.000 --> 25:35.000] Good luck with that. [25:35.000 --> 25:38.000] I haven't seen that happening. [25:38.000 --> 25:43.000] The way you win is you get in their pocketbook. [25:43.000 --> 25:47.000] If you get a few extra bucks, nice. [25:47.000 --> 25:51.000] Okay, Nancy, do you have anything else for us? [25:51.000 --> 25:53.000] Well, just one last question. [25:53.000 --> 25:58.000] You talked about using a trial by jury is a little bit risky [25:58.000 --> 26:02.000] because you don't know which way the jury is really going to go. [26:02.000 --> 26:09.000] But then also that's the ideal, though, according to our Constitution, [26:09.000 --> 26:12.000] is to have a trial by jury. [26:12.000 --> 26:18.000] So it just feels confusing to know what's the best. [26:18.000 --> 26:20.000] That's not exactly the ideal. [26:20.000 --> 26:27.000] The ideal is having the absolute right to a trial by jury. [26:27.000 --> 26:29.000] Okay. [26:29.000 --> 26:32.000] It's not necessarily ideal to have a trial by jury. [26:32.000 --> 26:39.000] If you have an issue that's very technical and highly complex, [26:39.000 --> 26:41.000] juries just don't get it. [26:41.000 --> 26:45.000] You don't have time to put a jury through law school [26:45.000 --> 26:50.000] so they can understand these highly technical legal issues. [26:50.000 --> 26:53.000] In those cases, I want it before a judge. [26:53.000 --> 26:57.000] Because the jury, they can do anything they want to. [26:57.000 --> 27:05.000] Thomas Jefferson said that juries are the ultimate check [27:05.000 --> 27:08.000] to the balance of good government. [27:08.000 --> 27:11.000] I'm sorry. [27:11.000 --> 27:21.000] They're the ultimate check to, not check, check's not the right word. [27:21.000 --> 27:24.000] Let me just say defense against bad law. [27:24.000 --> 27:27.000] Because if the legislature passes bad law [27:27.000 --> 27:30.000] and the jury refuses to enforce that law, [27:30.000 --> 27:33.000] the legislature will have to change it. [27:33.000 --> 27:38.000] So in that regard, the jury can do what it wants to. [27:38.000 --> 27:42.000] It doesn't have to follow law. [27:42.000 --> 27:47.000] The jury, once it's given to the jury, they can do whatever they want. [27:47.000 --> 27:50.000] And I don't necessarily want that. [27:50.000 --> 27:57.000] I'm in the process of taking on the system for not following their own law. [27:57.000 --> 27:59.000] If I go before a jury, [27:59.000 --> 28:04.000] the jury gets to decide whether it wants to hold these public officials [28:04.000 --> 28:07.000] to the rule of law or not. [28:07.000 --> 28:11.000] The judge does not have that luxury. [28:11.000 --> 28:18.000] He's bound by code to properly apply the law to the facts. [28:18.000 --> 28:21.000] He doesn't get to ignore the law the way the jury can. [28:21.000 --> 28:24.000] So it depends on what kind of issue you've got. [28:24.000 --> 28:30.000] If you've got an issue where a policeman stops someone like Joe was talking about [28:30.000 --> 28:36.000] and the woman is a passenger in the car and she gets charged with DUI, [28:36.000 --> 28:39.000] I want that before a jury. [28:39.000 --> 28:41.000] They're not going to go for that. [28:41.000 --> 28:44.000] In a trial court, the judge is not going to care. [28:44.000 --> 28:48.000] He just wants to get a guilty plea. [28:48.000 --> 28:51.000] So you need to look at it. [28:51.000 --> 28:55.000] Who would likely give you the best outcome? [28:55.000 --> 28:56.000] Yeah. [28:56.000 --> 28:57.000] Okay. [28:57.000 --> 28:58.000] All right. [28:58.000 --> 28:59.000] Well, thank you so much. [28:59.000 --> 29:04.000] It's a delight calling in and I really appreciate it. [29:04.000 --> 29:06.000] And anytime you want to call in, [29:06.000 --> 29:11.000] just call in and say nice stuff about us and we'll keep you on all day. [29:11.000 --> 29:12.000] All righty. [29:12.000 --> 29:13.000] You got a deal. [29:13.000 --> 29:14.000] Okay. [29:14.000 --> 29:15.000] Okay. [29:15.000 --> 29:16.000] Thank you, Nancy. [29:16.000 --> 29:17.000] Okay. [29:17.000 --> 29:19.000] Now we're going to go to Chris in New York. [29:19.000 --> 29:22.000] Hello, Chris. [29:22.000 --> 29:24.000] Hey, Randy. [29:24.000 --> 29:27.000] What do you have for us today? [29:27.000 --> 29:34.000] Well, Randy, just to preserve my rights in New York State, [29:34.000 --> 29:38.000] I filed a notice of claim because it's going to be about 90 days [29:38.000 --> 29:44.000] from the false arrest and kidnapping and false imprisonment. [29:44.000 --> 29:47.000] And I wanted to preserve my rights [29:47.000 --> 29:49.000] in case I wanted to be used. [29:49.000 --> 29:50.000] Okay. [29:50.000 --> 29:51.000] Wait, wait. [29:51.000 --> 29:52.000] Hang on. [29:52.000 --> 29:54.000] We will get to that on the other side. [29:54.000 --> 29:56.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio. [29:56.000 --> 30:01.000] We'll be right back. [30:01.000 --> 30:04.000] Everyone knows that walking is a great exercise, [30:04.000 --> 30:06.000] but you might not know that the way you walk [30:06.000 --> 30:08.000] could predict how long you're going to live. [30:08.000 --> 30:11.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back to tell you more [30:11.000 --> 30:14.000] about walking prognostication in just a moment. [30:14.000 --> 30:16.000] Privacy is under attack. [30:16.000 --> 30:19.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:19.000 --> 30:21.000] And once your privacy is gone, [30:21.000 --> 30:24.000] you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:24.000 --> 30:26.000] So protect your rights. [30:26.000 --> 30:29.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:29.000 --> 30:32.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:32.000 --> 30:36.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [30:36.000 --> 30:40.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:40.000 --> 30:43.000] Start over with StartPage. [30:43.000 --> 30:48.000] New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live. [30:48.000 --> 30:52.000] The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults [30:52.000 --> 30:56.000] who walk one meter per second or faster live longer than expected. [30:56.000 --> 31:00.000] In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour. [31:00.000 --> 31:05.000] A senior's age, gender, and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy [31:05.000 --> 31:07.000] as more traditional statistical measures. [31:07.000 --> 31:10.000] Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer. [31:10.000 --> 31:13.000] Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive. [31:13.000 --> 31:16.000] It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk, and a few minutes. [31:16.000 --> 31:21.000] Researchers say it could help doctors identify older patients who need special care. [31:21.000 --> 31:41.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:51.000 --> 31:55.000] There is more to the story. Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. [31:55.000 --> 32:01.000] Go to buildingwatch.org. Why it's so, why it matters, and what you can do. [32:01.000 --> 32:06.000] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word? [32:06.000 --> 32:13.000] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk, [32:13.000 --> 32:18.000] where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [32:18.000 --> 32:22.000] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, [32:22.000 --> 32:25.000] rightly dividing the word of truth. [32:25.000 --> 32:28.000] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, [32:28.000 --> 32:32.000] where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [32:32.000 --> 32:37.000] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [32:37.000 --> 32:39.000] and Christian character development. [32:39.000 --> 32:44.000] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [32:44.000 --> 32:48.000] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more [32:48.000 --> 32:51.000] into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [32:51.000 --> 32:54.000] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com, [32:54.000 --> 33:02.000] Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [33:02.000 --> 33:12.000] Live, free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [33:12.000 --> 33:31.000] Yeah, yeah, oh [33:31.000 --> 33:50.000] I won't, oh I won't, I won't let you pull the wool over my eyes. [33:50.000 --> 34:01.000] They must refuse your news also from in my eyes. [34:01.000 --> 34:02.000] Okay, we are back. [34:02.000 --> 34:10.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Root of Law Radio on this Friday, the 29th day of April, 2022. [34:10.000 --> 34:13.000] And we have some empty slots on the caller board. [34:13.000 --> 34:15.000] If you have a question or comment, give us a call. [34:15.000 --> 34:21.000] It's 246-1984 and we're talking to Chris in New York. [34:21.000 --> 34:24.000] Okay, Chris, where were we? [34:24.000 --> 34:31.000] He was just about to tell us, following a notice of claim and hasn't yet said what for. [34:31.000 --> 34:33.000] Oh, okay. [34:33.000 --> 34:34.000] There you go. [34:34.000 --> 34:35.000] Go ahead, Chris. [34:35.000 --> 34:38.000] We both, both of us unmuted you, so it's a toggle. [34:38.000 --> 34:42.000] So Brett unmuted you and I remuted you and now I've unmuted you. [34:42.000 --> 34:45.000] Now you can talk and I'll shut up. [34:45.000 --> 34:51.000] Okay, so the notice, I was filing a notice of claim because I was just making sure, [34:51.000 --> 34:57.000] preserving my rights because you have to do that in New York State within 90 days of the incident. [34:57.000 --> 35:03.000] The incident was, we've talked about this before, I was doing an audit at the county building after [35:03.000 --> 35:12.000] RG3 warning the county executive and sheriff in writing about their legal policy of forcing masks onto people [35:12.000 --> 35:15.000] in order to enter a public accommodation. [35:15.000 --> 35:21.000] And when I went down there for the second time, they had arrested me on a vacated bench for it. [35:21.000 --> 35:30.000] And then I had the ADA try to misrepresent the warrant and say that it was not fine, [35:30.000 --> 35:36.000] or that it was for not paying fines, which is just not the point. [35:36.000 --> 35:41.000] So anyways, they immediately dropped all that stuff. [35:41.000 --> 35:47.000] The action against me trying to use OB recharges that have already been resolved. [35:47.000 --> 35:51.000] And now I'm doing bar grievances. [35:51.000 --> 36:01.000] They actually, the public defender and the ADA that took place, you know, that were part of the arraignment. [36:01.000 --> 36:06.000] I have two bar grievances against both of them. [36:06.000 --> 36:15.000] One of them did an affirmation trying to state his case of why he can be a bonehead and been confident. [36:15.000 --> 36:20.000] So I answered that one and the other one just sent a letter and I shot that one apart. [36:20.000 --> 36:26.000] And I'm still waiting to hear back from the bar grievance committee. [36:26.000 --> 36:35.000] So in the meantime, because the Notice of Claim needs to be served to like, you know, it's a county issue, [36:35.000 --> 36:39.000] so I served it to the county attorney's office. [36:39.000 --> 36:43.000] And then I got this letter in a mail, certified register, [36:43.000 --> 36:49.000] because I had to send mine certified register because that's what it says how to do it in the New York State Code. [36:49.000 --> 36:57.000] And I got this letter from this big law firm from a different part of the state. [36:57.000 --> 37:05.000] And it's addressed to me, okay, Christopher A. Roberts, because that's my full name, okay. [37:05.000 --> 37:17.000] Then the next page is the Notice of Examination and it's pursuant to General Municipal Law 50-H, which is the Notice of Claim. [37:17.000 --> 37:23.000] So they're wanting more information, which they, you know, they have every right to do. [37:23.000 --> 37:29.000] But this is addressed to Christopher J. Roberts, and that's not me. [37:29.000 --> 37:32.000] Then in the body of the, you know... [37:32.000 --> 37:33.000] Okay, hold on, hold on. [37:33.000 --> 37:37.000] In law, they're going to call that a nun's pro-tunk. [37:37.000 --> 37:38.000] Okay. [37:38.000 --> 37:40.000] It's a minor boo-boo. [37:40.000 --> 37:47.000] Addressing that is a distinction without a difference. [37:47.000 --> 37:53.000] You know, a lot of people in the Patriot movement tried to take on these tiny little details. [37:53.000 --> 37:56.000] That's not, it's an irrelevant detail. [37:56.000 --> 38:03.000] You, the real you, got constructive notice even though they had a typo in the document. [38:03.000 --> 38:06.000] And that's what the court's going to say. [38:06.000 --> 38:12.000] They had a made minor boo-boo, but it was not material. [38:12.000 --> 38:18.000] Should I answer these people back and tell them that they made a mistake right away and refix it and send it to me? [38:18.000 --> 38:28.000] No, go ahead and just note to them that you, they got your name wrong and ask them to correct it in future documents. [38:28.000 --> 38:33.000] But don't pick a fight about something that's unimportant. [38:33.000 --> 38:35.000] Okay, very good. [38:35.000 --> 38:37.000] Yeah, that was really minor stuff. [38:37.000 --> 38:43.000] You really want to set them up and lead them into big stuff where you can really kick their behinds. [38:43.000 --> 38:46.000] Good enough. [38:46.000 --> 38:51.000] Okay, there's a thing we do. [38:51.000 --> 38:59.000] I had a friend, Ken Magnuson, and he said that I preach to the church the malcontents. [38:59.000 --> 39:06.000] Okay, yeah, and kind of we do, and I was talking to Dr. Joe on the break. [39:06.000 --> 39:13.000] He's on the corner board, and he was talking about rapport, that we're all out of rapport. [39:13.000 --> 39:25.000] When we're dealing with the courts, the best way to jerk their chains is to be nice to them. [39:25.000 --> 39:29.000] Don't raise minor issues that are unimportant. [39:29.000 --> 39:38.000] When a lawyer from the other side files a motion or a pleading and just rips you to shreds, and you file a response to it, [39:38.000 --> 39:46.000] the first thing you do is say, counselors' criticisms are well taken, [39:46.000 --> 39:54.000] and then go in to show him why what he did was improper or whatever. [39:54.000 --> 39:59.000] A little bit of courtesy really screws them up. [39:59.000 --> 40:01.000] I'm pretty well known around here. [40:01.000 --> 40:05.000] When I go into courts, I'm always laughing and joking with them. [40:05.000 --> 40:15.000] Most of them have never heard me ever raise my voice, but they are terrified when I come into their court. [40:15.000 --> 40:23.000] The word is, if that Kelton comes into your court, he's trying to get you to do something so he can try to get you arrested, and that's true. [40:23.000 --> 40:25.000] I am. [40:25.000 --> 40:30.000] But what do you do with a guy like that when he's always nice and laughing and joking? [40:30.000 --> 40:33.000] How's it going? [40:33.000 --> 40:39.000] He's in a position where it's difficult for them to vilify you. [40:39.000 --> 40:44.000] I had Olivier on the call earlier, but he dropped off. [40:44.000 --> 40:48.000] Olivier, if you're listening, call back. [40:48.000 --> 40:50.000] He did this in the federal court. [40:50.000 --> 40:54.000] The federal court dismissed his case, and he was furious. [40:54.000 --> 41:04.000] I told him, you know, when a federal court renders a ruling, they'll give you a judgment that explains exactly why they ruled the way they did. [41:04.000 --> 41:08.000] Federal courts always give findings, effect, and conclusions of law. [41:08.000 --> 41:11.000] That's what the judgment is. [41:11.000 --> 41:15.000] He read it, and he realized that they were right, [41:15.000 --> 41:20.000] that they were telling him exactly what was wrong with his document and how to fix it. [41:20.000 --> 41:28.000] So I suggested that when he filed his response, start out with the court's criticisms are well taken. [41:28.000 --> 41:30.000] He did that. [41:30.000 --> 41:47.000] They discussed his next document, his next reading, but in the judgment, the court referenced the fact that Olivier said that the court's criticisms were well taken. [41:47.000 --> 41:54.000] They indicated that we hope these criticisms are also well taken. [41:54.000 --> 41:58.000] That meant it went a long way. [41:58.000 --> 42:08.000] A little bit of schmoozing these guys, and don't let them lead you into starting fights that aren't necessary. [42:08.000 --> 42:12.000] Am I making sense, Chris? [42:12.000 --> 42:14.000] It sure does, Randy. [42:14.000 --> 42:17.000] If they're mad at you, don't let them know it. [42:17.000 --> 42:18.000] I'm sorry. [42:18.000 --> 42:21.000] If you're mad at them, don't let them know it. [42:21.000 --> 42:28.000] If they can push your buttons and get you to dance for them, they know how to do that. [42:28.000 --> 42:29.000] They do that all the time. [42:29.000 --> 42:37.000] When they start pushing your buttons and the buttons don't work, they're the ones that get tripped up. [42:37.000 --> 42:38.000] Okay. [42:38.000 --> 42:40.000] Where were you? [42:40.000 --> 42:42.000] Back to your issue. [42:42.000 --> 42:43.000] Back to my issue? [42:43.000 --> 42:46.000] Well, I just wanted to know if there was anything to do with that. [42:46.000 --> 42:53.000] I'm just finishing up some work that generates me money so I can file a lawsuit, and I have a case, [42:53.000 --> 42:58.000] and I've pretty much got it all written off, and I'm going to be in federal court. [42:58.000 --> 43:05.000] I just wanted to preserve my rights, but they want me to appear like May 25th was my evidence and stuff. [43:05.000 --> 43:07.000] I'll be filing hopefully before that. [43:07.000 --> 43:10.000] I was just doing the notice of shame on this. [43:10.000 --> 43:13.000] Have you been in the federal court before? [43:13.000 --> 43:15.000] No. [43:15.000 --> 43:17.000] Okay, this is what's going to happen. [43:17.000 --> 43:22.000] They're going to chew you up and spit you out. [43:22.000 --> 43:27.000] But you'll learn from that. [43:27.000 --> 43:30.000] The one thing that you've got is you can always come back and appeal. [43:30.000 --> 43:32.000] There's always something you can do. [43:32.000 --> 43:33.000] They're going to beat you up. [43:33.000 --> 43:36.000] They're going to get you to say stupid stuff you wish you hadn't said, [43:36.000 --> 43:40.000] and they're going to do stuff you wish you would have said that you didn't say. [43:40.000 --> 43:42.000] Join the club. [43:42.000 --> 43:43.000] We all do that. [43:43.000 --> 43:45.000] Don't let that bother you. [43:45.000 --> 43:49.000] You're in the federal courts, and they will help you out. [43:49.000 --> 43:51.000] I'll address that when we come back on the other side. [43:51.000 --> 43:54.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Ruval Radio. [43:54.000 --> 44:00.000] We'll be right back. [44:00.000 --> 44:04.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, [44:04.000 --> 44:06.000] except in the area of nutrition. [44:06.000 --> 44:09.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, [44:09.000 --> 44:11.000] and it's time we changed all that. [44:11.000 --> 44:16.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment [44:16.000 --> 44:17.000] is good nutrition. [44:17.000 --> 44:22.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, [44:22.000 --> 44:25.000] young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [44:25.000 --> 44:30.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, [44:30.000 --> 44:31.000] most of which we reject. [44:31.000 --> 44:34.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, [44:34.000 --> 44:40.000] we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [44:40.000 --> 44:43.000] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, [44:43.000 --> 44:47.000] your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [44:47.000 --> 44:52.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [44:52.000 --> 44:55.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, [44:55.000 --> 44:59.000] help your friends and family, and increase your income. [44:59.000 --> 45:01.000] Order now. [45:01.000 --> 45:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:04.000 --> 45:07.000] Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary. [45:07.000 --> 45:12.000] The affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how [45:12.000 --> 45:15.000] in 24 hours, step-by-step. [45:15.000 --> 45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:23.000 --> 45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [45:28.000 --> 45:31.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney [45:31.000 --> 45:34.000] with 22 years of case-winning experience. [45:34.000 --> 45:39.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [45:39.000 --> 45:43.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:43.000 --> 45:47.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, [45:47.000 --> 45:52.000] forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.000 --> 45:56.000] Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner [45:56.000 --> 46:04.000] or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EASY. [46:04.000 --> 46:29.000] Okay, we are back. [46:29.000 --> 46:34.000] We're talking to Chris in New York. [46:34.000 --> 46:37.000] Chris, we talked to Nancy before you. [46:37.000 --> 46:44.000] We're having a good day today because you sound a lot like Nancy. [46:44.000 --> 46:48.000] Apparently, they came after you, and you got it all dismissed. [46:48.000 --> 46:53.000] And most people, when that happens, they are so relieved [46:53.000 --> 46:56.000] that this burden is off of them. [46:56.000 --> 47:02.000] They just want to go away and not think about it ever again. [47:02.000 --> 47:07.000] You didn't seem to take that position. [47:07.000 --> 47:13.000] You took it as, okay, now let's fight. [47:13.000 --> 47:17.000] Have you been through Jurisdictionary? [47:17.000 --> 47:20.000] Oh, yeah. [47:20.000 --> 47:26.000] Yeah, we're on track. I've been in Alphonse for about a year, [47:26.000 --> 47:29.000] just listening to everybody. [47:29.000 --> 47:32.000] And then I picked my own fight with the public accommodation [47:32.000 --> 47:35.000] and the face mask because I don't like that. [47:35.000 --> 47:39.000] And that's where it all started, and now it's snowballed [47:39.000 --> 47:44.000] and it involves, like, there were 40 people in my notice of claim. [47:44.000 --> 47:49.000] This is how you change the world we live in. [47:49.000 --> 47:54.000] Not that going and getting the heads of government [47:54.000 --> 47:59.000] and all these major players torn down. [47:59.000 --> 48:02.000] Do it down here at the bottom. [48:02.000 --> 48:05.000] Start taking them off at the knees. [48:05.000 --> 48:12.000] And if we can get more people like you, we can begin to make change. [48:12.000 --> 48:15.000] So keep this up and keep us up to speed. [48:15.000 --> 48:19.000] Do you have any other questions that we didn't address? [48:19.000 --> 48:23.000] No, just waiting for stuff to come back because I got criminal complaints, [48:23.000 --> 48:28.000] two different criminal complaints out in front of two different judges. [48:28.000 --> 48:30.000] Okay, well, you're in New York. [48:30.000 --> 48:35.000] Have you tried taking criminal complaints directly to a grand jury? [48:35.000 --> 48:38.000] Why, where is it? [48:38.000 --> 48:42.000] Only the attorney knows where that is, right? [48:42.000 --> 48:47.000] No, New York recently revamped their grand juries. [48:47.000 --> 48:50.000] They've got a really good grand jury, [48:50.000 --> 48:54.000] but the prosecuting attorney is going to do everything he can [48:54.000 --> 48:58.000] to keep you from getting to a grand jury. [48:58.000 --> 49:06.000] The reason we have grand juries is to protect us against prosecutors. [49:06.000 --> 49:09.000] Prosecutors can do what grand juries are doing, [49:09.000 --> 49:13.000] but our founders know better. [49:13.000 --> 49:19.000] Grand juries are the genius of our founders. [49:19.000 --> 49:23.000] Go down and start making grand jury noises. [49:23.000 --> 49:29.000] You want to hear every anal sphincter in the place squeeze shut. [49:29.000 --> 49:34.000] When you start going after grand juries, everybody gets nervous. [49:34.000 --> 49:37.000] Doesn't always matter if you get to the grand jury or not. [49:37.000 --> 49:43.000] Even if you do, it doesn't matter if you get an indictment or not. [49:43.000 --> 49:49.000] It's like playing Russian roulette with these guys' careers and their liberty. [49:49.000 --> 49:51.000] I walked into my district attorney's office. [49:51.000 --> 49:53.000] He's got his head in his hand. [49:53.000 --> 49:55.000] He's looking morose. [49:55.000 --> 49:57.000] And I said, what's the matter, Greg? [49:57.000 --> 50:02.000] And he looked up at me and said, those darn grand jurors, [50:02.000 --> 50:05.000] you never know what they're going to do. [50:05.000 --> 50:09.000] I held up both hands above my head, looked up at the ceiling and said, [50:09.000 --> 50:12.000] there is a God. [50:12.000 --> 50:19.000] I could not have heard anything better than that. [50:19.000 --> 50:26.000] You hear all this stuff about prosecutors controlling grand jurors. [50:26.000 --> 50:30.000] Well, you know, Scalia said that any prosecutor worth his salt [50:30.000 --> 50:33.000] could get a ham sandwich indictment. [50:33.000 --> 50:35.000] That might be true. [50:35.000 --> 50:40.000] The problem they have is keeping the ham sandwich from getting indicted. [50:40.000 --> 50:44.000] When you start taking public officials to grand juries, they are terrified. [50:44.000 --> 50:47.000] Everybody is terrified. [50:47.000 --> 50:56.000] So, Chris, if you want to file complaints, go down and file them with grand jury. [50:56.000 --> 50:58.000] What do you mean go down? [50:58.000 --> 51:00.000] Can you explain the process? [51:00.000 --> 51:08.000] Generally, the grand jury's address is the address of the prosecuting attorney. [51:08.000 --> 51:16.000] So I send criminal complaints to the grand jury addressed to the district attorney's office. [51:16.000 --> 51:19.000] But the addressee is the foreman of the grand jury, [51:19.000 --> 51:25.000] and I put a cover letter in the folder asking the foreman to initial this document [51:25.000 --> 51:29.000] and send it back to me so that I know that you actually received this. [51:29.000 --> 51:32.000] I've never gotten one back. [51:32.000 --> 51:34.000] But when I don't get one back in a couple of years... [51:34.000 --> 51:36.000] I got one back one time. [51:36.000 --> 51:38.000] Oh, yes. [51:38.000 --> 51:41.000] I don't even know how many, but yeah, one. [51:41.000 --> 51:43.000] What is one? [51:43.000 --> 51:45.000] If you don't get it back... [51:45.000 --> 51:49.000] That's the one where I said, that's the one where the grand jury foreman said, [51:49.000 --> 51:52.000] we decline to inquire into this matter. [51:52.000 --> 51:54.000] And I said, okay, that'll work. [51:54.000 --> 51:58.000] And I filed criminal charges against the grand jury foreman [51:58.000 --> 52:02.000] because he has an oath that he has to inquire into that matter. [52:02.000 --> 52:04.000] The text is... [52:04.000 --> 52:07.000] It used to be 20.08. [52:07.000 --> 52:09.000] It changed the numbering system. [52:09.000 --> 52:11.000] Under duties of grand juries, it says, [52:11.000 --> 52:16.000] the grand jury shall investigate into all crimes subject to indictment [52:16.000 --> 52:20.000] that come to their knowledge by way of any member of the grand jury, [52:20.000 --> 52:26.000] the prosecuting attorney, or any credible person. [52:26.000 --> 52:29.000] It does not say may, might, or can if he wants to. [52:29.000 --> 52:33.000] It says shall. [52:33.000 --> 52:37.000] Just think of the storm he stirred up [52:37.000 --> 52:40.000] when he's going after the grand jury foreman. [52:40.000 --> 52:43.000] I had a prosecuting attorney tell me once, [52:43.000 --> 52:47.000] oh, Mr. Keldon, please don't mess with my grand jury. [52:47.000 --> 52:50.000] They're hard enough to see it as it is. [52:50.000 --> 52:52.000] That's the weak underbelly. [52:52.000 --> 52:54.000] That's the genus of our founders. [52:54.000 --> 52:56.000] We need to use that. [52:56.000 --> 53:00.000] So just send a letter to the DA with a cover letter. [53:00.000 --> 53:03.000] When you don't get that cover letter back, [53:03.000 --> 53:06.000] then you have reasonable probable cause to believe [53:06.000 --> 53:12.000] that the prosecuting attorney secreted those documents from the grand jury. [53:12.000 --> 53:14.000] And if you use the U.S. mail to send them to them, [53:14.000 --> 53:18.000] then you call the postal inspectors [53:18.000 --> 53:22.000] and get them down there to talk to the grand jury [53:22.000 --> 53:28.000] about where that document went to. [53:28.000 --> 53:30.000] Does that sound like fun, Chris? [53:30.000 --> 53:32.000] Oh, yeah. [53:32.000 --> 53:35.000] This is about honing our skills. [53:35.000 --> 53:37.000] How many ways can you get after them? [53:37.000 --> 53:42.000] How much political pressure can you bring on them before they decide? [53:42.000 --> 53:45.000] This is not worth it. [53:45.000 --> 53:48.000] This got off our case. [53:48.000 --> 53:52.000] Randy, should we be concerned about that tone of voice that sounds like [53:52.000 --> 53:58.000] Chris might enjoy this and you might be creating a monster here? [53:58.000 --> 53:59.000] Well, that is a problem. [53:59.000 --> 54:08.000] You do have to be careful because this can get to be way too much fun. [54:08.000 --> 54:11.000] But it's a light thing to do. [54:11.000 --> 54:18.000] And if we do it not out of anger or avarice, but we do it for the purpose, [54:18.000 --> 54:23.000] for the right reason, for the purpose of making things better. [54:23.000 --> 54:27.000] Now, I live in this county, and I have really hammered them. [54:27.000 --> 54:28.000] They don't like me. [54:28.000 --> 54:30.000] They're afraid of me. [54:30.000 --> 54:34.000] But one thing they do is respect me. [54:34.000 --> 54:39.000] I had the chief of police in the county seat, Decatur, Texas. [54:39.000 --> 54:43.000] I saw him one day and he said, what were you doing in Wichita Falls? [54:43.000 --> 54:45.000] I said, you know about that? [54:45.000 --> 54:46.000] Oh, yeah. [54:46.000 --> 54:48.000] And I got a call from the chief of police. [54:48.000 --> 54:51.000] He wanted to know if you were crazy. [54:51.000 --> 54:53.000] I said, what did you tell him? [54:53.000 --> 54:56.000] Oh, yeah, he's crazy. [54:56.000 --> 54:59.000] But if he quotes a lot of you, pay attention. [54:59.000 --> 55:02.000] He does his homework. [55:02.000 --> 55:04.000] I'll take that. [55:04.000 --> 55:07.000] That works for me. [55:07.000 --> 55:11.000] So it's okay to be crazy. [55:11.000 --> 55:15.000] And it's okay to have fun with this. [55:15.000 --> 55:20.000] Your having fun with it makes it much worse for them. [55:20.000 --> 55:24.000] Okay, I'm going to stop preaching now. [55:24.000 --> 55:29.000] Okay, do you have anything else for us today? [55:29.000 --> 55:30.000] No, thanks a lot, Randy. [55:30.000 --> 55:32.000] I got a mission to accomplish. [55:32.000 --> 55:33.000] Thank you. [55:33.000 --> 55:36.000] Okay, keep us up to date. [55:36.000 --> 55:44.000] This is why we do this show, is to find guys like you and girls like Nancy. [55:44.000 --> 55:46.000] So keep up the good work. [55:46.000 --> 55:50.000] Okay, now we're going to go to Jack in Texas. [55:50.000 --> 55:53.000] Hello, Jack. [55:53.000 --> 55:57.000] What do you have for us today? [55:57.000 --> 56:02.000] Well, I have a few more questions to make a nuisance to myself. [56:02.000 --> 56:15.000] Of course, to the kings of justice, to the students, and fairness. [56:15.000 --> 56:25.000] Okay, so the first question I have is about finding out the qualifications of the police officer. [56:25.000 --> 56:29.000] I think Brett was the one that mentioned it. [56:29.000 --> 56:32.000] How do I go about doing that? [56:32.000 --> 56:40.000] Qualifications, you mean whether he has the authority to enforce transportation code, that kind of a thing? [56:40.000 --> 56:44.000] Yes, authority. [56:44.000 --> 56:53.000] Well, you might look in the Texas transportation code, there's 644.101, [56:53.000 --> 56:59.000] if it's a municipal organization that's got him hired, or if it is a county officer. [56:59.000 --> 57:03.000] You want to take a look at, I believe it's 701. [57:03.000 --> 57:08.000] 701.001 through 003. [57:08.000 --> 57:19.000] It's important to consider that the administrative code that created the Department of Public Safety [57:19.000 --> 57:27.000] created that department for the purpose of enforcing the commercial transportation code. [57:27.000 --> 57:36.000] And in their enabling statutes, it says that the Department of Public Safety may not enforce the criminal laws [57:36.000 --> 57:44.000] except at the request of and under the direction of local law enforcement. [57:44.000 --> 57:49.000] They're not classified as peace officers, they're classified as police officers, [57:49.000 --> 57:54.000] and they are delegated authority to enforce this commercial code. [57:54.000 --> 58:05.000] The sheriff's department in certain circumstances can delegate sheriff's deputies to enforce transportation code. [58:05.000 --> 58:20.000] 701.001 through 003 says that the county commissioner's court can appoint a sheriff's deputy as a traffic control officer. [58:20.000 --> 58:25.000] They must pay the deputy, and the deputy must ride a motorcycle. [58:25.000 --> 58:35.000] So they have delegated specific authority to that one entity under certain circumstances to enforce that code. [58:35.000 --> 58:38.000] They didn't delegate that authority to anyone else. [58:38.000 --> 58:41.000] We'll speak to that when we come back on the other side. [58:41.000 --> 58:50.000] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, we'll be right back. [58:50.000 --> 58:54.000] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? [58:54.000 --> 59:01.000] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help. [59:01.000 --> 59:06.000] The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today. [59:06.000 --> 59:13.000] It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [59:13.000 --> 59:18.000] The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. [59:18.000 --> 59:27.000] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church. [59:27.000 --> 59:40.000] To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102. [59:40.000 --> 59:44.000] That's 888-551-0102. [59:44.000 --> 59:49.000] Or visit us online at bfa.org. [59:49.000 --> 01:00:00.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:10.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it. [01:00:10.000 --> 01:00:17.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:17.000 --> 01:00:22.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:27.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:35.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:00:35.000 --> 01:00:43.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:46.000] Start over with Startpage. [01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:52.000] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers and find a third party there. [01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:55.000] He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. [01:00:55.000 --> 01:01:01.000] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent. [01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:07.000] It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. [01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:09.000] Third party, Third Amendment? Get it? [01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:17.000] So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment. [01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:31.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:35.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:40.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it. [01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:47.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:52.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:01:52.000 --> 01:01:57.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:01:57.000 --> 01:02:02.000] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:05.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:13.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:16.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:22.000] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles. [01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:28.000] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. [01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:31.000] Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it? [01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:35.000] Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security. [01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:40.000] Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. [01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:47.000] When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells. [01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:54.000] Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. [01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:01.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:31.000] Thank you very much. [01:03:55.000 --> 01:03:57.000] Okay, we are back. [01:03:57.000 --> 01:04:00.000] Randy Fountain, Little Guy Radio. [01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:06.000] On this Friday, the 29th day of April, 2022. [01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:10.000] And we're talking to Jack in Texas. [01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:12.000] Jack, the troublemaker. [01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:15.000] Okay. [01:04:15.000 --> 01:04:19.000] Where were we, Jack? [01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:24.000] Okay. I have a couple more things. [01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:31.000] So I've got the subject matter challenge. [01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:46.000] And I included the judicial notice, you know, that I know that they're supposed to prove that they have jurisdiction. [01:04:46.000 --> 01:04:53.000] So I should not include a challenge to the officer's authority in there, right? [01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:59.000] I should just save that for later. [01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:00.000] Wait a minute. [01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:04.000] Say the officer's authority? [01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:09.000] Do you have my subject matter jurisdiction? [01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:14.000] Yeah, subject matter jurisdiction challenge. [01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:17.000] Is this the one that I wrote? [01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:20.000] No, I haven't gotten that one yet. [01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:21.000] Oh, okay. [01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:27.000] You called me today and sent me an email, and I didn't get that to you yet. [01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:30.000] I have a subject matter jurisdiction challenge. [01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:43.000] And what it challenges is precisely this issue, that the officer who wrote the citation is not authorized to enforce the transportation code. [01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:48.000] There's a brief on that subject. [01:05:48.000 --> 01:05:55.000] Is that what you're addressing in subject matter jurisdiction? [01:05:55.000 --> 01:05:58.000] I haven't gotten to the officer yet. [01:05:58.000 --> 01:06:06.000] The subject matter jurisdiction is just based on the challenge, right? [01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:18.000] And then I put in a judicial notice with a bunch of citations saying that they have to prove that they have subject matter jurisdiction. [01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:19.000] Okay. [01:06:19.000 --> 01:06:29.000] Well, in order to get a good response, you need to assert why they don't have jurisdiction. [01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:35.000] Otherwise, they'll just come back and say they have jurisdiction like they did. [01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:41.000] Nancy, who was it earlier, Brett, that we have jurisdiction because we say we do? [01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:43.000] Oh, yeah, that was really handy. [01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:46.000] I think that was what they told Hannah. [01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:47.000] That's right. [01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:56.000] You need to indicate why they don't have jurisdiction rather than just give a blank subject matter jurisdiction challenge. [01:06:56.000 --> 01:07:05.000] Technically, you can go into court and say I challenge your jurisdiction and they're required to prove it up. [01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:10.000] But they can offer any proof they want to and the court will accept it. [01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:19.000] You need to pre-argue the issues you expect them to bring. [01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:20.000] I see. [01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:26.000] Okay. Well, I'm having real trouble with that. [01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:37.000] That's one of the first things I went after is when the officer turned his lights on, what authority did he have to do that? [01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:38.000] What specific authority? [01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:44.000] What I was talking about earlier about the designation of authority. [01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:55.000] In the code, they indicated that they created the Department of Public Safety for the purpose of enforcing this code. [01:07:55.000 --> 01:08:06.000] Then they authorized sheriff's deputies under certain circumstances when they're appointed by the county commission's court to enforce this code. [01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:10.000] Where else is there designated authority to enforce this code? [01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:15.000] As far as I know of, there's only one other place and that's 644. [01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:16.000] Is that it? [01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:19.000] We're at 614. [01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:23.000] Yes, it's 44.101. [01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:47.000] That where a municipal police officer can be certified to do DOT inspections, but it does not authorize the officer to enforce the transportation code generally, only to do DOT inspections. [01:08:47.000 --> 01:09:03.000] So since they have delegated certain duties, it can't be presumed that the municipal police officer or sheriff's deputy automatically has the right to enforce this commercial transportation code. [01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:05.000] Does that make sense, Jeff? [01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:09.000] Yeah, that makes perfect sense. [01:09:09.000 --> 01:09:17.000] In that subject matter jurisdiction challenge, that's what I go to. [01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:24.000] Where do you get authority to enforce this particular statutory scheme? [01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:33.000] Now to get past that one, the next challenge is to the sufficiency of the complaint itself. [01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:40.000] There's always one question they don't ask that should be the first question they ask. [01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:43.000] Do you know what that is, Jack? [01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:46.000] Was I engaged in transportation? [01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:50.000] Exactly, you're the only one that got that. [01:09:50.000 --> 01:10:03.000] Are you transporting persons or property for hire that is necessary to bestow jurisdiction on the court? [01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:06.000] That's the second one I would bring. [01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:10.000] We don't want to get to the merits if we can avoid it. [01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:12.000] So those are the first two. [01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:16.000] You got any more, Brett? [01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:19.000] No, I think that's great. [01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:26.000] Those are the two that helps us avoid the merits of the case. [01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:31.000] Because if it goes to the merits, the judge is always going to rule in favor of the policeman. [01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:33.000] Right. [01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:38.000] Okay, I'll end with the transportation because that's what Eddie had in his thing. [01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:41.000] We'll have to switch that around. [01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:46.000] Okay, I will send that to you in the morning. [01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:49.000] We probably won't tonight or it'll be too late. [01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:54.000] I may not still be conscious when the show's over. [01:10:54.000 --> 01:10:55.000] Okay. [01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:00.000] I did text you my email address, but I can give it to you. [01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:01.000] That's okay. [01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:03.000] You text it to me. [01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:06.000] I'll find it in the morning. [01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:08.000] All right. [01:11:08.000 --> 01:11:11.000] Hey, Jack, before you go, let me tell you. [01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:17.000] The Texas Administrative Code, you'll find something interesting over there about this. [01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:21.000] It tells you about these references that we've just been talking about. [01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:28.000] It's Texas Administrative Code in Section 4.13 and 4.14. [01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:35.000] It talks about the authority to enforce the training and certificate requirements. [01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:43.000] It talks about the way that a municipal or a county can participate in that, [01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:48.000] certification requirements, and their eligibility to participate. [01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:53.000] And they have to have a memorandum of understanding with the DPS for that. [01:11:53.000 --> 01:12:02.000] Yeah, that's the one where they do DOT inspections. [01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:04.000] Take a look at that. [01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:08.000] Yeah, it doesn't go to general enforcement. [01:12:08.000 --> 01:12:11.000] All right, one more thing, now that Breton reminded me. [01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:18.000] So I was trying to do the hyperlinks, like you said, Randy, on this document, [01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:26.000] but I'm having trouble finding the case laws that I'm finding references to them, [01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:29.000] but I can't find the actual case online. [01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:32.000] Is there a secret to this? [01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:41.000] No, I just put the case citation into Google and I generally find it. [01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:45.000] Well, all I'm finding is people who are referencing the case. [01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:50.000] Well, click on one of those links. [01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:54.000] Case law and a number of them will have... [01:12:54.000 --> 01:12:56.000] Case text. [01:12:56.000 --> 01:12:57.000] Case text, yeah. [01:12:57.000 --> 01:12:59.000] Sometimes I can't find it in Google. [01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:03.000] It will refer me to case text to a case that cites it, [01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:09.000] but in there where it cites the case, that will be hyperlinked. [01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:13.000] And I click on that and get to the case. [01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:15.000] Okay. [01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:17.000] All right, let's see. [01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:29.000] One more, oh, what about maybe down the line a notice of liability? [01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:33.000] Tort letter. [01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:34.000] That would be a tort letter? [01:13:34.000 --> 01:13:38.000] Yeah, that's what a tort letter is. [01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:47.000] This being wrongfully, you're not in a contract with a governmental agency, [01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:52.000] so you wouldn't send them a notice of contractual violations. [01:13:52.000 --> 01:13:55.000] Those are causes of action. [01:13:55.000 --> 01:14:01.000] If you're not in contract with someone and they injure you, that's a tort. [01:14:01.000 --> 01:14:09.000] Technically, these public officials are in contractual privity with us. [01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:15.000] They swore to their oath and they got paid as a result, so that creates a contract, [01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:19.000] and we are the third party beneficiaries of the contract. [01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:21.000] But that's nitpicking. [01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:26.000] All you have to do is say, you did this thing, you acted wrongfully, [01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:30.000] you harmed me in this amount, make me wholly be sued. [01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:34.000] That's basically a tort letter. [01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:40.000] I'd generally like to write the lawsuit and take the lawsuit heading off [01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:44.000] and put a business letter heading on it and take the prayer out, [01:14:44.000 --> 01:14:50.000] put in make me wholly be sued as follows, and then you write your prayer [01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:53.000] and then do your business salutation. [01:14:53.000 --> 01:14:56.000] When the lawyer looks at that, he'll know you're not kidding, [01:14:56.000 --> 01:14:59.000] and they're more likely to offer you a deal. [01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:04.000] But even if they don't, you've got your lawsuit mostly written already. [01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:08.000] So when they don't respond, you just change the headings out, [01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:14.000] add whatever case law you need, and so on. [01:15:14.000 --> 01:15:16.000] Okay. [01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:17.000] All right, well, that sounds good. [01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:19.000] I sure appreciate you guys. [01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:20.000] Okay. [01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:21.000] Thank you, Jack. [01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:25.000] Now we're going to go to Shane in New York. [01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:27.000] Hello, Shane. [01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:31.000] What do you have going on? [01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:35.000] Randy, I just got back from Cleveland, Ohio. [01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:37.000] Okay. [01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:40.000] What were you doing in Cleveland, Ohio? [01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:47.000] Well, I went with my notary, and we went ahead and filed the... [01:15:47.000 --> 01:15:50.000] Actually, we dropped off the amended summons [01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:53.000] and complaints against KeyBank and all the officers. [01:15:53.000 --> 01:15:57.000] I didn't have $2,700 to serve them through the sheriff's department, [01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:03.000] but I could afford $100, so I served the president of KeyBank, [01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:06.000] which made a little bit over $11.2 billion last year. [01:16:06.000 --> 01:16:09.000] Wait, hold on, hold on. [01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:12.000] This doesn't sound happy. [01:16:12.000 --> 01:16:15.000] Is this a federal case? [01:16:15.000 --> 01:16:16.000] This is a state case. [01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:19.000] I just filed a suit about three weeks ago. [01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:22.000] What does the state law say about who can serve? [01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:26.000] Generally, it's a cross-test server [01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:32.000] or anyone not directly involved in the case. [01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:33.000] Exactly. [01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:36.000] Okay, you can't serve it, but you're notably correct. [01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:37.000] Correct, correct, correct. [01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:39.000] That's absolutely correct. [01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:40.000] Okay, good. [01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:42.000] Hang on, we've got to go to our sponsors. [01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:43.000] Yes. [01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:46.000] We've got two segments and two callers, [01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:48.000] so I won't get out the calling numbers. [01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:50.000] We should be able to finish out with these. [01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:53.000] I don't know how long Wayne and Shane can be. [01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:54.000] Okay, just kidding. [01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:56.000] Ready to count in Brett Fountain. [01:16:56.000 --> 01:16:57.000] We're low on radio. [01:16:57.000 --> 01:17:00.000] We'll be right back. [01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:02.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors [01:17:02.000 --> 01:17:05.000] with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:13.000] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, [01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:15.000] and now you can win too. [01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:17.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English [01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:20.000] on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, [01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:24.000] what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, [01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:26.000] how to answer letters and phone calls, [01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:29.000] how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, [01:17:29.000 --> 01:17:33.000] how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:38.000] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:17:41.000 --> 01:17:44.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com [01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:46.000] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner [01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:49.000] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:57.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com [01:17:57.000 --> 01:18:00.000] to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:01.000] I love Logos. [01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:04.000] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [01:18:04.000 --> 01:18:07.000] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [01:18:07.000 --> 01:18:08.000] I need my truth fixed. [01:18:08.000 --> 01:18:10.000] I'd be lost without Logos, [01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:13.000] and I really want to help keep this network on the air. [01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:16.000] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, [01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:20.000] and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [01:18:20.000 --> 01:18:22.000] How can I help Logos? [01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:24.000] Well, I'm glad you asked. [01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:27.000] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos [01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:29.000] with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. [01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:31.000] First thing you do is clear your cookies. [01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:35.000] Now, go to logosradio.network.com. [01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:38.000] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:40.000] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, [01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:43.000] you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. [01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:44.000] Do I pay extra? [01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:45.000] No. [01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:47.000] Do I have to do anything different when I order? [01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:48.000] No. [01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:49.000] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [01:18:49.000 --> 01:18:50.000] No. [01:18:50.000 --> 01:18:51.000] I mean, yes. [01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:52.000] Wow. [01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:54.000] Giving without doing anything or spending any money. [01:18:54.000 --> 01:18:55.000] This is perfect. [01:18:55.000 --> 01:18:57.000] Thank you so much. [01:18:57.000 --> 01:18:58.000] We are welcome. [01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:00.000] Happy holidays, Logos. [01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:10.000] This is the Logos Radio Network. [01:19:30.000 --> 01:19:42.000] Thank you so much. [01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:15.000] Thank you. [01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:30.000] Thank you. [01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:31.000] Okay. [01:20:31.000 --> 01:20:32.000] We are back. [01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:34.000] Brandy, Kelton, Brett, Fountain of the Royal Royal Radio. [01:20:34.000 --> 01:20:36.000] We're talking Shane in New York. [01:20:36.000 --> 01:20:37.000] Okay. [01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:38.000] You got them served? [01:20:38.000 --> 01:20:39.000] Yes. [01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:45.000] Brandy, I got everybody served. [01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:48.000] The Sheriff's Department, I believe, served them today. [01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:57.000] The president of KeyBank and all the other 25 officers was served through the notary. [01:20:57.000 --> 01:21:02.000] And those affidavit of services have been completed and filled out, [01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:07.000] and they have been sent directly in the mail to the actions and personnel. [01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:12.000] To the actions and proceedings here in Erie County, New York. [01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:16.000] So the fat's in the fire. [01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:17.000] That's correct, Brandy. [01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:24.000] So the only question I have for you is I got wind that the judge at the... [01:21:24.000 --> 01:21:25.000] Okay. [01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:26.000] Okay. [01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:30.000] I had wind, but it's better now. [01:21:30.000 --> 01:21:38.000] Go ahead. [01:21:38.000 --> 01:21:42.000] Are you dumbfounded, Shane? [01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:45.000] Well, I'm not really sure how this whole thing is going to pan out, [01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:52.000] but I do know that the clerk told me that the county judge is flipping out right now. [01:21:52.000 --> 01:21:54.000] Good. [01:21:54.000 --> 01:21:55.000] Yeah. [01:21:55.000 --> 01:21:58.000] But I want to let you know that I did drive all the way down to Cleveland, [01:21:58.000 --> 01:22:02.000] three and a half hours, three and a half hours, a seven-hour drive round trip. [01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:06.000] And I took it directly to the corporate office. [01:22:06.000 --> 01:22:08.000] The notary did everything. [01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:11.000] I just basically provided transportation. [01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:13.000] I wonder. [01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:19.000] But what I did, Randy, the CEO, the president of KeyBank, [01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:21.000] was served through the sheriff's department, [01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:25.000] so therefore the sheriffs are aware of the case. [01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:28.000] Okay. [01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:29.000] That's good. [01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:32.000] What did you sue for? [01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:36.000] Wrongful foreclosure actions. [01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:39.000] The actual amended complaint is absolutely incredible. [01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:40.000] It really is fantastic. [01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:46.000] I know you've seen some of the work that I've done before, but it's great. [01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:48.000] It's great. [01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:52.000] Here's a question I have for you real quick before you go to the next caller. [01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:56.000] The attorney emailed me and asked me to sign a consent form [01:22:56.000 --> 01:23:01.000] to extend the time to answer this until June 1st. [01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:04.000] Absolutely not. [01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:09.000] Okay. [01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:17.000] And she also wanted to respond for all the officers for KeyBank with one attorney. [01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:20.000] I don't think you have anything to say about that. [01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:23.000] Yeah, so I'm not going to respond to that. [01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:25.000] Yeah, she doesn't need your permission. [01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:27.000] They can all hire one attorney. [01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:30.000] That's up to them. [01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:33.000] Yeah, so I'm not going to respond to that. [01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:38.000] I do have a small claims hearing on Wednesday that was filed almost four years ago. [01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:40.000] It was postponed because of COVID, [01:23:40.000 --> 01:23:43.000] and that is the small claims against the referee for moving forward [01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:48.000] with no standing or jurisdiction and forged documents. [01:23:48.000 --> 01:23:54.000] So I'm going to be in court at the small claims court in Buffalo, New York for that. [01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:00.000] You may extract some information that you can manage to go to a legal court. [01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:04.000] Well, yeah, yeah, I don't want to lay too much out here on the phone. [01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:09.000] But one thing I will tell you, and I'm not sure if I'm crossing the line here, [01:24:09.000 --> 01:24:15.000] I believe that we know for a fact that the county judge [01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:18.000] put my picture up as a threat in the courthouse. [01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:23.000] So when I walk through security, these guys have a book of people, I'm one of them. [01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:25.000] And I wasn't supposed to know about this. [01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:28.000] I'm not very nice from North Carolina. [01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:36.000] And a friend of mine's stepson or son-in-law was a sheriff on the Tarrant County Sheriff's Department, [01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:39.000] and he got the grand jury duty. [01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:46.000] And I asked Jim, what's Randy Kelton's picture doing hanging up in the grand jury room with a note that says, [01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:50.000] if you see this man, call security. [01:24:50.000 --> 01:24:53.000] I was honored. [01:24:53.000 --> 01:25:00.000] So Randy, I should not act on that and just leave that alone? [01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:02.000] I would leave that alone. [01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:04.000] Yeah, right. [01:25:04.000 --> 01:25:07.000] Well, one of the security guards, I had my dad come in behind me. [01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:10.000] They were all laughing and chuckling, the security guards. [01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:11.000] And they go, oh, look at that. [01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:12.000] That's my twin brother right there. [01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:14.000] That's, I guess, one of the security guards. [01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:16.000] This looks exactly like me, I guess. [01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:18.000] And they were just laughing about it. [01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:21.000] And one of the supervisors, well, keep an eye on them. [01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:26.000] So every time I walk in the courthouse, they're keeping an eye on me, Randy. [01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:30.000] Yeah, I get that a lot. [01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:31.000] Okay. [01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:36.000] You give them something to watch. [01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:37.000] That's it, Randy. [01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:38.000] I just want to keep you updated. [01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:41.000] But, boy, it was, this is not an easy process. [01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:43.000] But I'm officially the plaintiff now. [01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:45.000] So we'll see what takes place. [01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:46.000] Wonderful. [01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:47.000] Okay. [01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:48.000] Keep us up to date. [01:25:48.000 --> 01:25:49.000] Okay. [01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:53.000] Now we're going to go to what appears to be a first-time caller. [01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:58.000] If you are from the 559 area code, talk to us. [01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:00.000] Hi. [01:26:00.000 --> 01:26:01.000] Good afternoon. [01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:02.000] Actually, good afternoon. [01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:07.000] Give us a first name and a state. [01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:11.000] My name is Johnny, and I'm from California. [01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:12.000] Okay. [01:26:12.000 --> 01:26:16.000] What do you have for us today? [01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:23.000] Well, I was actually referred to the channel. [01:26:23.000 --> 01:26:35.000] And I'm dealing with a situation that started with CPS and has led to criminal charges. [01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:36.000] I don't know how... [01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:42.000] Charges against you or against someone with CPS? [01:26:42.000 --> 01:26:55.000] In a nutshell, basically, CPS became involved in my case based off of I was on vacation [01:26:55.000 --> 01:27:04.000] with my wife and my three children, and our 10-month-year-old woke up one morning, [01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:12.000] Lafarge it, so mom wanted to take him to the hospital, and we go to the emergency room, [01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:14.000] and he is... [01:27:14.000 --> 01:27:19.000] They run a panel of tests on him, and he has a low glucose level. [01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:20.000] So they give him... [01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:26.000] They administer him a sugar shot, and because we were in the setting of an emergency room [01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:30.000] setting, they wanted to transfer him to a children's hospital. [01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:39.000] So when he's transferred to the children's hospital, CPS, after questioning us about [01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:50.000] his lifestyle, his nutrition, and what happened leading up to, CPS came in and basically [01:27:50.000 --> 01:28:02.000] detained him off of the fact that they believed that he was malnourished, and that led to [01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:12.000] them detaining him at the hospital, which dragged us into a juvenile court proceeding, [01:28:12.000 --> 01:28:18.000] and then a couple weeks after that, after we were forced attorneys and dragged through [01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:24.000] a jurisdictional hearing, and just going through that process in the juvenile court, criminal [01:28:24.000 --> 01:28:37.000] charges were filed on me and the mother for, in California, 273APC, which is willful child [01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:40.000] abuse and neglect. [01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:49.000] And basically, at that point, we were arrested during a visit, and the first question that [01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:53.000] I had asked the officer, I said, well, could you provide the warrant that you're here to [01:28:53.000 --> 01:28:54.000] arrest us? [01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:56.000] And he said, well, I don't need a warrant. [01:28:56.000 --> 01:28:59.000] There's probable cause. [01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:07.000] And so at that time, I really didn't have any prior knowledge or information about how [01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:15.000] to conduct myself dealing with state actors and, you know, even agencies and the police [01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:17.000] officers and whatnot. [01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:21.000] So we were dragged through the whole proceeding. [01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:22.000] Okay. [01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:24.000] I understand there's more to this, didn't there? [01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:29.000] Did they, have they taken other of your children? [01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:36.000] Well, they detained and took the infant who was 10 months of time. [01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:46.000] And then CPS had contacted my other children's mother, and they all told them that if they [01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:52.000] didn't take away visitations from me, that they were going to take them, too. [01:29:52.000 --> 01:30:01.000] So on one incident with CPS, I lost all visitations of my kids. [01:30:01.000 --> 01:30:07.000] A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America, if you build an electrical smart [01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:11.000] grid, the hackers will come and they could cause a catastrophic blackout. [01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:16.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment. [01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:21.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:26.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:34.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:40.000] This message is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, [01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:41.000] Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000] Start over with Startpage. [01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:50.000] Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into [01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:52.000] your home, too, with a smart grid. [01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:56.000] So they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely monitor electric [01:30:56.000 --> 01:30:59.000] use for efficiency and avoid grid failure. [01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:03.000] But cybersecurity expert David Chalk says not so fast. [01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:08.000] If we make the national power grid controllable through the web, hackers will have a field day. [01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:13.000] Working remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation, leaving us vulnerable [01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:15.000] to our enemies. [01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:18.000] I've long opposed smart meters for privacy and health reasons. [01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:22.000] But catastrophic failures caused by hackers? [01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:24.000] There's nothing smart about that. [01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:31.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:37.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:39.000] The government says the fire brought it down. [01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:44.000] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:48.000] 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow first [01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:49.000] responders are dying. [01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:51.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:56.000] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:56.000 --> 01:31:58.000] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:03.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:06.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:08.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [01:32:08.000 --> 01:32:11.000] And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to [01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:13.000] stand and defend our own rights. [01:32:13.000 --> 01:32:16.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [01:32:16.000 --> 01:32:20.000] in our own private capacity, and, most importantly, the right to due process of law. [01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:24.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [01:32:24.000 --> 01:32:26.000] our rights through due process. [01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:29.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put [01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:33.000] together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what [01:32:33.000 --> 01:32:36.000] due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:40.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:41.000] ordering your copy today. [01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:45.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:49.000] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [01:32:49.000 --> 01:32:51.000] documents, and other useful resource material. [01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:55.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [01:32:55.000 --> 01:33:02.000] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:12.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:32.000 --> 01:34:01.000] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton Betts, out in Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to [01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:02.000] John Yee in California. [01:34:02.000 --> 01:34:03.000] John Yee in California, okay. [01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:04.000] Hello, John. [01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:05.000] Okay. [01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:06.000] You said that maybe it was low sugar. [01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:07.000] I've never heard of an infant that's that bad of diabetes. [01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:08.000] Does diabetes run in your family? [01:34:08.000 --> 01:34:29.000] Diabetes does run in my family, but what became a logical diagnosis at a later time, because [01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:37.700] what ended up happening was we were dragged through a criminal proceeding as well, and [01:34:37.700 --> 01:34:40.000] I just finished a criminal trial in February. [01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:44.000] And what was the ruling on that? [01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:47.000] Well, it was a hung jury. [01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:54.000] They deadlocked at 6-6, and they declared it a mistrial. [01:34:54.000 --> 01:35:00.000] So I'm due for a retrial that's scheduled for May 26. [01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:04.000] What specifically were you charged with? [01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:11.000] We were charged with a felony for child neglect. [01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:20.000] That was the charge with enhancement attached to that. [01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:25.000] So after the first trial, I didn't have... [01:35:25.000 --> 01:35:34.000] Again, I was guided by the grace of God, to be honest, but I since then have educated [01:35:34.000 --> 01:35:41.000] myself to the jurisdictionary course and have been doing what's necessary and following [01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:47.000] proper procedure and rules of evidence and the rules of court, preparing myself for this [01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:53.000] next trial, and I was able to get a second opinion, which I wasn't able to do that the [01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:54.000] first trial. [01:35:54.000 --> 01:36:01.000] And the second opinion was that he suffered from a positional asphyxiation, which basically [01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:07.000] means that he suffocated, which led to all the symptoms that he was experiencing. [01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:13.000] But in the trial, and what we're charged for was they tried to base the diagnosis off of [01:36:13.000 --> 01:36:22.000] the fact that we practiced a plant-based lifestyle, and that kind of had been their... [01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:25.000] Just vegetarian or vegan? [01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:26.000] Vegan. [01:36:26.000 --> 01:36:27.000] Yeah. [01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:30.000] What does plant-based lifestyle mean? [01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:31.000] Vegetarian. [01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:37.000] It sounds like when he says lifestyle, I'm thinking maybe it's more than just diet. [01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:46.000] Well, I mean, the terminology that's probably more common is a vegan. [01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:47.000] I just... [01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:55.000] Because my background as a nutritionist in detoxification, kind of, you know, this wasn't [01:36:55.000 --> 01:36:56.000] just... [01:36:56.000 --> 01:37:07.000] When you're involved with CPS, the CPS always tries to make the worst out of the parent, [01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:12.000] and that's kind of what they did, and that's kind of the narrative that they created from [01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:13.000] the beginning. [01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:20.000] So we never really got an opportunity to go on the offensive because we were being attacked [01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:22.000] from the very beginning. [01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:32.000] But this whole situation has just been a huge learning curve in regards to understanding [01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:42.000] the due process, and at this point, I've kind of just been reaching out to individuals, [01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:49.000] just getting different inputs and outtakes on what's occurring. [01:37:49.000 --> 01:37:52.000] So I don't... [01:37:52.000 --> 01:37:55.000] I haven't heard anything. [01:37:55.000 --> 01:37:57.000] Go ahead. [01:37:57.000 --> 01:37:58.000] Okay. [01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:02.000] So you were tried, a non-jury. [01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:09.000] What's the disposition of your children now? [01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:16.000] Well, this was all pertaining to just Art Vincent, who was 10 months at the time, and [01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:24.000] through the juvenile proceedings, they've already gone through the whole trial and have [01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:29.000] terminated our parental rights prior to us being convicted of a crime. [01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:30.000] Whoa. [01:38:30.000 --> 01:38:32.000] How is that possible? [01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:38.000] Before there's been a final outcome to the case, just terminate your rights based on [01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:39.000] what? [01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:42.000] It's been a mess. [01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:51.000] In fact, the trial judge in the juvenile proceeding allowed hearsay evidence to be admitted, and [01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:58.000] that's basically what they used, along with the preponderance of the evidence, which they [01:38:58.000 --> 01:39:07.000] forced attorneys onto us, which would not allow us to create a record in court. [01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:12.000] I saw it tooth and nail. [01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:15.000] I went through four or five different attorneys, but at the end of the day, they just wouldn't [01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:20.000] allow us to handle our own affairs. [01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:22.000] They kept forcing attorneys onto us. [01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:26.000] How did they force attorneys on you? [01:39:26.000 --> 01:39:32.000] Well, from the beginning, we had said and requested that... [01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:34.000] We didn't even request it. [01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:36.000] We just said, well, we don't want attorneys. [01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:39.000] Then they said, well, can you afford an attorney? [01:39:39.000 --> 01:39:43.000] I said, well, yeah, we can afford an attorney, but we don't want to have attorneys in this [01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:44.000] matter. [01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:46.000] We want to handle our own affairs. [01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:50.000] The judge ruled that, in the juvenile court, that that wasn't going to happen. [01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:54.000] He forced an attorney onto us, and then... [01:39:54.000 --> 01:39:59.000] Are there rules for juvenile courts that require attorneys? [01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:03.000] No, there isn't. [01:40:03.000 --> 01:40:06.000] Have you appealed... [01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:13.000] That should have got an introductory appeal. [01:40:13.000 --> 01:40:32.000] Well, we got sidebarred on that, because the first counsel that we had, after the parental [01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:39.000] termination rights were conducted, we had 30 days to schedule an appeal. [01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:49.000] On the 29th day, Mother's attorney said, well, we don't have the grounds to go to an appeal, [01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:52.000] so they didn't file an appeal on her behalf. [01:40:52.000 --> 01:41:00.000] Then the Sunday after the 30th day, I received a FedEx package with all of our transcripts [01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:07.000] and reports in a big box and a note that said, sorry, but I'm not going to file an appeal [01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:08.000] from the fourth counsel. [01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:15.000] I never heard from them again. [01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:19.000] That leads us now to just where we're at. [01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:27.000] Now we've already gone through one trial and preparing for a second trial, which I still [01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:35.000] don't really know how that is, but California has a statute that states that on a mistrial [01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:40.000] that the prosecution has an opportunity to retry the case, which they are. [01:41:40.000 --> 01:41:53.000] They fired the previous prosecutor and brought in their aid team. [01:41:53.000 --> 01:41:57.000] Okay, I've gotten kind of where you're at. [01:41:57.000 --> 01:42:00.000] What is your question for us? [01:42:00.000 --> 01:42:13.000] My question is, when dealing with CPS, and to me it's been apparent that CPS has some [01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:24.000] form of, this agency, it's not really overlooked, that there is no way, shape, or form, any [01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:33.000] form of value towards natural rights, constitutional rights, and in fact... [01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:37.000] Okay, wait, wait, wait. [01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:40.000] You're not asking us anything. [01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:43.000] You're just giving us a dialogue. [01:42:43.000 --> 01:42:49.000] Yeah, well, the question is pertaining to them, where how can I hold them accountable? [01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:57.000] How can we proceed in this case where we've already lost the parental rights in the CPS [01:42:57.000 --> 01:42:58.000] matter? [01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:04.000] What are some steps and measures that we can put, go on the offensive to make right is [01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:05.000] wrong? [01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:14.000] Unfortunately, that's far too general a question for us to be able to answer without more definitive [01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:22.000] information concerning what the issues are that were adjudicated, which ones were not [01:43:22.000 --> 01:43:23.000] adjudicated. [01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:27.000] We need to understand more about what's before the court. [01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:30.000] I wouldn't have any idea what to say. [01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:35.000] And date on those things when they were adjudicated. [01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:37.000] I probably made a good timeline. [01:43:37.000 --> 01:43:41.000] Hang on, we'll speak to that on the other side. [01:43:41.000 --> 01:43:44.000] Miranda Kelton, Brett Fountain, via the radio. [01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:50.000] We've only got one more segment, so I won't give out the calling number. [01:43:50.000 --> 01:44:00.000] We'll be right back. [01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:05.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:06.000] of nutrition. [01:44:06.000 --> 01:44:11.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:17.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:44:17.000 --> 01:44:23.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can [01:44:23.000 --> 01:44:25.000] provide the nutrients you need. [01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:30.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which [01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:31.000] we reject. [01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:37.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with [01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:39.000] Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:46.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:47.000] quality radio. [01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:52.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:44:52.000 --> 01:44:57.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [01:44:57.000 --> 01:44:59.000] increase your income. [01:44:59.000 --> 01:45:03.000] Order now. [01:45:03.000 --> 01:45:06.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:06.000 --> 01:45:12.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, [01:45:12.000 --> 01:45:17.000] four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:17.000 --> 01:45:21.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:21.000 --> 01:45:25.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:25.000 --> 01:45:30.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:30.000 --> 01:45:36.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:36.000 --> 01:45:41.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about [01:45:41.000 --> 01:45:45.000] the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:45.000 --> 01:45:52.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:15.000] pro se tactics, and much more. [01:46:15.000 --> 01:46:34.000] Okay, we are back. [01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:39.000] Brenda Kelton, Brett Stoughton, we have our radio. [01:46:39.000 --> 01:46:46.000] Let me start with California. [01:46:46.000 --> 01:46:52.000] They always tell me their county is the most corrupt county in the nation. [01:46:52.000 --> 01:46:57.000] I used to think that Williamson County, Texas, was the most corrupt county in the nation, [01:46:57.000 --> 01:47:00.000] but everybody thinks that. [01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:08.000] But when it comes to California, I think that really is the most corrupt state in the area. [01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:18.000] And with that said, they've taken one child and blocked you from visiting the other two. [01:47:18.000 --> 01:47:24.000] This is way too complex for us to address just directly on the air. [01:47:24.000 --> 01:47:29.000] Have you written up a timeline of events? [01:47:29.000 --> 01:47:33.000] Yes, I do have everything documented. [01:47:33.000 --> 01:47:38.000] No, no, not documented, but a timeline. [01:47:38.000 --> 01:47:41.000] This happened, and this happened, and this happened. [01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:48.000] Just like one specific document that ties all of that into chronology. [01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:50.000] Yeah, thank you. [01:47:50.000 --> 01:48:07.000] Okay, email that to me, randy at ruleoflawradio.com, and I will look at it and email you back a response. [01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:08.000] All right, sounds great. [01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:10.000] I appreciate that. [01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:13.000] Randy at ruleoflaw.com. [01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:14.000] Okay, hang on, John. [01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:20.000] We've got a caller that wants to talk to you. [01:48:20.000 --> 01:48:24.000] Ed in Georgia, you wanted to talk to John. [01:48:24.000 --> 01:48:25.000] Yes, sir. [01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:31.000] Actually, I've been listening to your call, and I just want to say I appreciate you talking to John. [01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:33.000] I've been trying to help him from Georgia. [01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:35.000] John left out some things. [01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:43.000] He actually went through five threats with these attorneys, and I got with him when he was on his... [01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:46.000] Sorry, five what? [01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:48.000] Ferretta hearings. [01:48:48.000 --> 01:48:52.000] In other words, he said, I'm not getting effective assistance to counsel. [01:48:52.000 --> 01:49:06.000] They did a ferretta hearing, and then they would take the attorney away for the cause that Johnny's shown, and then they would put another attorney on him right away. [01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:19.000] Another thing I didn't know about these family courts, which in my estimation, even though I don't live in California, they're stealing children for profit in California is what they're actually doing. [01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:22.000] That's my thought on the matter. [01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:24.000] And so these... [01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:27.000] Well, Georgia was famous for that too. [01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:30.000] Who? [01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:31.000] I'm sorry? [01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:32.000] And Georgia. [01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:34.000] Georgia was famous for that too. [01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:41.000] Well, I'm fighting it here as well. [01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:52.000] But he was on his third attorney by the time I got to him, and he kept asking, well, how are you getting around Article 1, Section 16? [01:49:52.000 --> 01:49:54.000] I mean, I know how they're doing it. [01:49:54.000 --> 01:50:02.000] It's private international law that they're using under the USFAA and the UCCJEA. [01:50:02.000 --> 01:50:04.000] No, no, no, don't go there. [01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:06.000] This is not commercial law. [01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:10.000] They're using the family code in California. [01:50:10.000 --> 01:50:13.000] Which is JEA. [01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:19.000] Yeah, which is governed by the Uniform Child custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act. [01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:22.000] No, it is not. [01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:25.000] This commercial code, it does not apply here. [01:50:25.000 --> 01:50:32.000] In the last 15 years, I've had people trying to force the commercial code into everything. [01:50:32.000 --> 01:50:33.000] He's not saying UCC. [01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:36.000] He's saying it's called Uniform... [01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:45.000] This is back to the thing about we don't want acronyms, but this is the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. [01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:52.000] It's this thing that they try to impose to say why somebody has jurisdiction. [01:50:52.000 --> 01:50:55.000] It's not just UCC. [01:50:55.000 --> 01:50:56.000] Okay, my bad. [01:50:56.000 --> 01:50:59.000] I hate acronyms. [01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:00.000] That's okay. [01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:02.000] Gets us all tripped up. [01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:08.000] And just so you know, USFAA is a Uniform Interstate Family Support Act. [01:51:08.000 --> 01:51:16.000] These acts being governed by the Hague Treaty or the Hague Convention, private international law, are being introduced. [01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:22.000] And I'll tell you fellow something, I can't find an up-and-down vote in California for either one of those acts. [01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:24.000] But I know where they're coming from. [01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:28.000] They're coming from the Uniform Law Commission in Chicago, Illinois. [01:51:28.000 --> 01:51:31.000] Also, these acts are copyrighted. [01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:34.000] And Johnny doesn't have copyright. [01:51:34.000 --> 01:51:37.000] No, you cannot copyright law, period. [01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:38.000] We've got case law on that. [01:51:38.000 --> 01:51:44.000] You know, I can show you the act, and on the first page at the bottom, it says copyright. [01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:48.000] That doesn't matter, you see, when it's law. [01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:53.000] If it's sharing a copyright, it's an unenforceable copyright. [01:51:53.000 --> 01:51:55.000] Or it's not a law. [01:51:55.000 --> 01:51:57.000] Right, or it's not a law. [01:51:57.000 --> 01:51:59.000] That's absolutely right. [01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:03.000] Because I can't find an up-and-down vote by the legislature. [01:52:03.000 --> 01:52:11.000] The use of that, the code should give a subject matter of jurisdiction challenge. [01:52:11.000 --> 01:52:12.000] And it did. [01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:14.000] We did the challenge to the AG. [01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:17.000] But again, as Johnny told you, he couldn't get anything into the record. [01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:18.000] No, no, no. [01:52:18.000 --> 01:52:20.000] You do it in the court. [01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:29.000] You file in the court and claim that the code they're using is not valid code, that the code is void. [01:52:29.000 --> 01:52:31.000] And they're going to say, oh, no, it's not void. [01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:35.000] And then you run that through the appeals process. [01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:37.000] Which is where he's at right now. [01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:40.000] But I guarantee you, none of these issues are going to get challenged [01:52:40.000 --> 01:52:44.000] because he has to have an attorney to go through the appeals process. [01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:52.000] I would probably drop over dead if I ever saw an attorney challenge jurisdiction right out of the gate. [01:52:52.000 --> 01:52:53.000] I tend to agree with you. [01:52:53.000 --> 01:52:55.000] You're not going to do that, Judge. [01:52:55.000 --> 01:52:58.000] The attorney's not going to do anything to annoy the judge. [01:52:58.000 --> 01:53:00.000] Right. [01:53:00.000 --> 01:53:01.000] We have a way of fixing that. [01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:02.000] He's had three attorneys. [01:53:02.000 --> 01:53:06.000] Has he sued the first two for ineffective assistance to counsel? [01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:08.000] Has he bar-graved any of them? [01:53:08.000 --> 01:53:12.000] And bar-graved them till the cows come home? [01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:18.000] He's done a bar grievance, and we've received probably no less than five form letters [01:53:18.000 --> 01:53:24.000] from the California Bar Association saying that he has no merit to his case. [01:53:24.000 --> 01:53:26.000] I've had to go to hundreds of those. [01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:33.000] Because I'm not an attorney, but I'd like to know how they're getting around Article 1, Section 16 of the California Constitution. [01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:35.000] You're in California. [01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:38.000] We have a right to a trial by jury in India. [01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:40.000] That right shall remain in violation. [01:53:40.000 --> 01:53:42.000] Stop, stop, stop. [01:53:42.000 --> 01:53:46.000] You're operating on a false presumption. [01:53:46.000 --> 01:53:47.000] Okay. [01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:48.000] This is California. [01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:54.000] You're presuming that they care squat about law in California. [01:53:54.000 --> 01:53:57.000] Well, I know that they don't. [01:53:57.000 --> 01:54:02.000] They absolutely do not. [01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:08.000] Everybody used to call me and say my county is the most corrupt county in the nation. [01:54:08.000 --> 01:54:11.000] Well, you know, I tell them everybody says that. [01:54:11.000 --> 01:54:19.000] But now, after dealing with California, I think California is by far the most corrupt state in the world. [01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:24.000] It seems like they're not even putting on, you know, the facade of pretending like they care about it. [01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:27.000] They just do what they want. [01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:28.000] And then they hide it. [01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:34.000] Then they hide the record saying that it's a private affair. [01:54:34.000 --> 01:54:35.000] You know, because... [01:54:35.000 --> 01:54:36.000] Okay. [01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:37.000] We can't do that. [01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:42.000] You're throwing stuff in there with no support. [01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:46.000] And we're reluctant to that. [01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:50.000] I have a rule, never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth. [01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:52.000] Give us some support for that. [01:54:52.000 --> 01:54:55.000] Don't just say this is happening. [01:54:55.000 --> 01:55:00.000] Now, I ran into a lot of these legal reform guys and like Jim Keating. [01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:02.000] I go to his site. [01:55:02.000 --> 01:55:05.000] I start going through his references to case law. [01:55:05.000 --> 01:55:08.000] And he's making these determinations based on this case law. [01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:10.000] And I go look up the case law. [01:55:10.000 --> 01:55:13.000] And none of them had anything to do with what he was saying. [01:55:13.000 --> 01:55:18.000] So he's making a statement, making a determination based on the statement. [01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:21.000] The statement may or may not be accurate. [01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:26.000] So we wind up in this quagmire. [01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:28.000] Support what you're telling us. [01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:30.000] Give us something to back it up. [01:55:30.000 --> 01:55:31.000] Okay. [01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:36.000] Well, in every Florida hearing, just for instance, as you mentioned case law, [01:55:36.000 --> 01:55:40.000] Johnny challenged jurisdiction and he challenged the fact that his attorney [01:55:40.000 --> 01:55:42.000] wouldn't challenge jurisdiction. [01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:46.000] In the case law he quoted was McNutt versus General Motors Acceptance Corporation [01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:52.000] from 1936, which states, and I quote, the asserter, once challenged, [01:55:52.000 --> 01:55:57.000] the asserter must prove jurisdiction on the record. [01:55:57.000 --> 01:56:00.000] Yeah, I'm saying it's not. [01:56:00.000 --> 01:56:02.000] But this is California. [01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:04.000] They don't care. [01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:05.000] I know. [01:56:05.000 --> 01:56:13.000] Ted, they've had him in court for seven years over a felony allegation [01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:15.000] that's not a crime. [01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:20.000] Yeah, it's not even a crime, even if it were true. [01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:25.000] So we have to find another way of dealing with this. [01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:30.000] Well, I tell you what, when you're not allowed to put anything into the record [01:56:30.000 --> 01:56:35.000] from the defensive side of the ball, but they can put hearsay into the record [01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:39.000] and the judge allows hearsay evidence in these family courts. [01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:43.000] Find a way to get this in the Fed. [01:56:43.000 --> 01:56:45.000] I'm sorry? [01:56:45.000 --> 01:56:48.000] Find a way to get this into the Fed. [01:56:48.000 --> 01:56:51.000] To take it out of their scope. [01:56:51.000 --> 01:56:55.000] Yes, yes. [01:56:55.000 --> 01:57:00.000] Well, what do you fellows suggest, a Civil 44 cover sheet? [01:57:00.000 --> 01:57:04.000] Don't know enough about the case to be able to suggest how we could get to the Fed. [01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:08.000] I'm sure there's plenty of federal due process violations, [01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:15.000] but we don't have enough information on it to be able to say specifically which one. [01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:18.000] So far about the case, we've got general conclusions about it, [01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:22.000] but we don't have anything specific enough. [01:57:22.000 --> 01:57:27.000] I hate to give recommendations when I don't have enough knowledge [01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:31.000] to be comfortable with what I'm addressing. [01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:33.000] Sure, and I'm not asking you to. [01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:40.000] I guess my question is more of a general nature of I cannot possibly fathom [01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:43.000] how they're getting away with doing this to loving parents [01:57:43.000 --> 01:57:51.000] and taking their children when they're all supposed to be fiduciaries to the parents. [01:57:51.000 --> 01:58:00.000] Do you know in these foreign acts there's not even a legal definition for the word parent? [01:58:00.000 --> 01:58:05.000] Okay, then if there's no definition in the code, [01:58:05.000 --> 01:58:10.000] then you use the websters, the general common definition. [01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:13.000] No definition in the code, there's no definition in the act. [01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:15.000] There's a definition. [01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:16.000] That doesn't need to be. [01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:19.000] The parent is very specific. [01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:23.000] If it's not in the code, then you use the general definition, [01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:29.000] and the general definition is biological persons who propagated the child. [01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:35.000] That's not something that would be confusing to be in conflict. [01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:38.000] Essentially, the distinction's a little different. [01:58:38.000 --> 01:58:40.000] I'm sorry, we are out of time. [01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:42.000] We've got ten seconds. [01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:50.000] Thank you all for listening, and good night. [01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:55.000] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible [01:58:55.000 --> 01:58:58.000] called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:02.000] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain [01:59:02.000 --> 01:59:06.000] what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God [01:59:06.000 --> 01:59:08.000] and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:26.000] This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, [01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:30.000] plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:36.000] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, [01:59:36.000 --> 01:59:41.000] call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:49.000] That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:49.000 --> 01:59:59.000] Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.