[00:00.000 --> 00:05.760] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.760 --> 00:09.420] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.420 --> 00:10.920] Our liberty depends on it. [00:10.920 --> 00:14.820] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [00:14.820 --> 00:16.920] your First Amendment rights. [00:16.920 --> 00:18.520] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.520 --> 00:22.120] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.120 --> 00:26.900] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:26.900 --> 00:32.080] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.080 --> 00:34.640] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:34.640 --> 00:38.940] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search [00:38.940 --> 00:42.480] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.480 --> 00:44.840] Start over with Startpage. [00:44.840 --> 00:47.760] Spar, it's what fighters do. [00:47.760 --> 00:51.240] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:51.240 --> 00:54.440] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:54.440 --> 01:01.560] Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, [01:01.560 --> 01:02.920] and R for religion. [01:02.920 --> 01:07.040] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, [01:07.040 --> 01:08.520] assembly, and religion. [01:08.520 --> 01:10.840] But petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.840 --> 01:14.560] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.560 --> 01:18.080] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out [01:18.080 --> 01:20.760] the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:20.760 --> 01:22.720] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:22.720 --> 01:31.040] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.040 --> 01:34.720] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. [01:34.720 --> 01:38.180] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:38.180 --> 01:39.680] Our liberty depends on it. [01:39.680 --> 01:43.560] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:43.560 --> 01:46.680] one of your constitutional rights. [01:46.680 --> 01:48.280] Privacy is under attack. [01:48.280 --> 01:51.880] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:51.880 --> 01:56.640] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:56.640 --> 02:01.800] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.800 --> 02:04.400] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [02:04.400 --> 02:08.680] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [02:08.680 --> 02:12.240] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.240 --> 02:15.800] Start over with StartPage. [02:15.800 --> 02:20.160] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill [02:20.160 --> 02:22.240] of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:22.240 --> 02:26.720] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms [02:26.720 --> 02:30.600] that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:30.600 --> 02:31.600] Get it? [02:31.600 --> 02:33.880] Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? [02:33.880 --> 02:37.480] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well [02:37.480 --> 02:43.240] when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary [02:43.240 --> 02:47.360] government, one more safeguard against the tyranny, which now appears remote in America, [02:47.360 --> 02:50.400] but which historically has proved to always be possible. [02:50.400 --> 02:52.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [02:52.400 --> 03:21.160] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:21.160 --> 03:41.240] Thank you. [03:51.160 --> 04:00.080] Okay, we are back with Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, and we have a lot of radio. [04:00.080 --> 04:05.440] I had a really busy break, so I kind of lost where we were at, Chris, what were we talking [04:05.440 --> 04:06.440] about? [04:06.440 --> 04:20.080] The article is 87 proceedings, and my question was that the judge for the DWI, because of [04:20.080 --> 04:28.520] the article 87 proceedings, he actually went ahead and denied my motion finally. [04:28.520 --> 04:34.400] Should I appeal that, or because I didn't complete an affidavit of service, even though [04:34.400 --> 04:42.360] my motion had on it, everybody that I cc'd with their certified mail number, and it's [04:42.360 --> 04:45.600] before I knew about affidavit of service. [04:45.600 --> 04:49.520] Okay, hold on, hold on. [04:49.520 --> 04:57.400] Should all of the people that should have been served respond to the motion? [04:57.400 --> 05:00.840] Nobody did. [05:00.840 --> 05:07.560] Do you have evidence that they all receive notice, or some of them receive notice? [05:07.560 --> 05:10.800] They get the certified numbers, the certified mail numbers. [05:10.800 --> 05:13.680] They sign for it, yeah. [05:13.680 --> 05:19.760] Okay, then did you file for summary judgment? [05:19.760 --> 05:23.200] No, I didn't. [05:23.200 --> 05:31.600] Okay, this calls for summary judgment on the motion that everybody received service on [05:31.600 --> 05:33.140] and didn't respond. [05:33.140 --> 05:41.600] When they didn't respond under law, that means they agree with what is in the motion. [05:41.600 --> 05:44.040] So you have a right to summary judgment. [05:44.040 --> 05:51.400] So I should just turn around and summary judgment right in that down core, because nobody- [05:51.400 --> 05:57.120] Yeah, okay, keep in mind, you're not asking for summary judgment dismissal of the entire [05:57.120 --> 05:58.120] case. [05:58.120 --> 06:08.040] You're asking for a summary ruling on the petition that you filed, because there are [06:08.040 --> 06:20.320] no issues in contention as the respondent stipulated to all of them by not answering. [06:20.320 --> 06:30.480] So as far as the court is concerned, everything you stated is true and unopposed. [06:30.480 --> 06:38.360] The only thing that would keep you from getting summary judgment is, I lost it when you said [06:38.360 --> 06:41.360] unopposed, Brett. [06:41.360 --> 06:47.240] I hate it when that happens. [06:47.240 --> 06:51.320] Okay, got it, got it, got it, got it, summary judgment. [06:51.320 --> 07:03.160] If you ask for a ruling that, if the court assumes that all of the facts are correct [07:03.160 --> 07:13.320] and they are true, it must still be sufficient to give you that ruling. [07:13.320 --> 07:18.880] Like when I filed the bar agreements against the lawyer for partner's hair on the left. [07:18.880 --> 07:25.480] If my facts are absolutely true, it's not gonna make any difference because it doesn't [07:25.480 --> 07:29.080] matter which side the lawyer parts his hair on. [07:29.080 --> 07:35.160] So even if the opposing counsel didn't object to that, the judge still couldn't give me [07:35.160 --> 07:45.720] a summary judgment ruling because the facts and the law brought to him are insufficient. [07:45.720 --> 07:53.920] But if I've made a sufficient argument and the other side doesn't respond to my argument, [07:53.920 --> 08:01.600] then the judge must read my facts and law and say based on the facts and law before [08:01.600 --> 08:04.240] the court. [08:04.240 --> 08:13.360] The court must rule that whatever the defendant asked must rule in favor of whatever the defendant [08:13.360 --> 08:14.360] asked for. [08:14.360 --> 08:20.240] I'm searching for a metaphor and kinda lost my spot there. [08:20.240 --> 08:29.760] So you get summary judgment if you have made a sufficient assertion or allegation in your [08:29.760 --> 08:32.120] motion. [08:32.120 --> 08:35.120] I did, but he already denied it. [08:35.120 --> 08:38.200] I shouldn't even concern myself with that. [08:38.200 --> 08:42.320] Wait, I couldn't understand you. [08:42.320 --> 08:45.880] Say that he moved the mic a little away from your mouth. [08:45.880 --> 08:48.120] He said the judge denied that motion. [08:48.120 --> 08:50.160] Well, that's okay. [08:50.160 --> 08:53.080] You don't care about that. [08:53.080 --> 08:56.960] This is all about appeal. [08:56.960 --> 09:03.520] Appeal is where you get the courts to properly read the law. [09:03.520 --> 09:06.440] So don't worry about what the judge does. [09:06.440 --> 09:10.880] Does that make sense, Chris? [09:10.880 --> 09:17.960] Yes, follow the summary judgment, I gotcha, into their town court to preserve the record [09:17.960 --> 09:20.840] and then after that, in the appeal. [09:20.840 --> 09:21.840] Correct? [09:21.840 --> 09:28.440] Okay, Brett, I'm having a terrible time understanding you. [09:28.440 --> 09:33.000] Yeah, it's a little fuzzy, but I think he's saying he's got it. [09:33.000 --> 09:35.680] He's gonna go follow summary judgment and... [09:35.680 --> 09:44.480] Yeah, just put it in your summary judgment, you put since opposing, you show that everybody's [09:44.480 --> 09:46.240] been served. [09:46.240 --> 09:55.120] And since all of the defendants failed to file a timely response, therefore, they stipulate [09:55.120 --> 10:03.880] to all the facts in law in my pleading and have a right to summary judgment dismissal. [10:03.880 --> 10:06.000] That's it. [10:06.000 --> 10:07.000] Okay. [10:07.000 --> 10:15.280] You go give that to the clerk, I'm sorry, I'm mixing default and summary. [10:15.280 --> 10:21.720] If you file a lawsuit and you serve the parties on the other side and they don't file an answer, [10:21.720 --> 10:26.240] then you drag out default judgment. [10:26.240 --> 10:30.440] But after they filed an answer, you can't use default anymore. [10:30.440 --> 10:33.080] Now you have to use summary judgment. [10:33.080 --> 10:37.800] I know that wasn't the question you asked, but I'm adding that in because it fits. [10:37.800 --> 10:42.480] So people will understand how to file their documents. [10:42.480 --> 10:54.040] If you're in court and you want to appeal an issue, you appeal it to the Court of Appeals. [10:54.040 --> 10:58.760] Lost my place again, Brett. [10:58.760 --> 11:02.040] You were just mentioning the difference between summary and default. [11:02.040 --> 11:03.040] I'm sorry. [11:03.040 --> 11:04.040] If you file- [11:04.040 --> 11:08.840] One is when you don't have any issues in controversy before the court, right? [11:08.840 --> 11:11.520] Yeah, and there's two ways that happens. [11:11.520 --> 11:16.240] One is you file an original petition, you serve everybody, nobody answers. [11:16.240 --> 11:20.720] That means they agree to all the facts. [11:20.720 --> 11:24.640] If you file an original, they agree to all the facts. [11:24.640 --> 11:27.200] So now you can file for default judgment. [11:27.200 --> 11:33.880] That's great because you prepare a petition for default judgment and show that claim that [11:33.880 --> 11:42.400] you filed a petition and defendant was properly served and defendant failed to answer, therefore [11:42.400 --> 11:45.760] you have a right to default judgment. [11:45.760 --> 11:51.280] Then you go to the clerk and give the clerk the document and ask the clerk to look in [11:51.280 --> 11:56.760] the record and find the date on which this case was filed. [11:56.760 --> 12:05.720] Find the date on which defendant was served and see if you find a answer by the defendant [12:05.720 --> 12:08.120] after this date. [12:08.120 --> 12:16.840] If she does not find an answer to this original petition within the time limit in the record, [12:16.840 --> 12:23.160] then she has authority to sign your default judgment. [12:23.160 --> 12:25.200] So it's real quick. [12:25.200 --> 12:31.620] She can count the days and say, you filed it 35 days ago. [12:31.620 --> 12:34.760] They received it 30 days ago. [12:34.760 --> 12:45.620] There is no evidence of an answer in the record within 20, within, oh, I'm sorry, by the Monday [12:45.620 --> 12:48.320] on the... [12:48.320 --> 12:51.000] The Monday after 20 days. [12:51.000 --> 12:56.120] On the Monday after the 20th day. [12:56.120 --> 13:02.800] So they say 20 days, 21 days, but that's not really what it is. [13:02.800 --> 13:05.700] It's the Monday after the 20th day. [13:05.700 --> 13:16.180] So if you file it on the Monday, the 20th day will land on a Sunday. [13:16.180 --> 13:21.600] So the next day is the Monday after the 20th day, and that'll give me exactly 21 days. [13:21.600 --> 13:25.040] But if you don't have one in there and the clerk can just look in the record and see [13:25.040 --> 13:30.740] this, I don't see this answer, signs the default. [13:30.740 --> 13:33.800] And then she sends it to the judge and he looks at it and he agrees with it. [13:33.800 --> 13:37.200] He just signs it and you're done, you're done. [13:37.200 --> 13:39.680] But summary judgment's different. [13:39.680 --> 13:44.040] Summary is where they did answer the original pleading. [13:44.040 --> 13:49.760] But you filed a motion or a pleading and opposing counsel did not respond to it. [13:49.760 --> 13:53.560] Now you have the right to default judgment. [13:53.560 --> 14:00.460] What you don't challenge is deemed admitted or agreed to. [14:00.460 --> 14:05.120] So have people say, oh, don't give the court jurisdiction. [14:05.120 --> 14:11.480] Somebody says, don't file anything to the court, don't give them jurisdiction, nonsense. [14:11.480 --> 14:18.520] Don't get you ruled against, always respond. [14:18.520 --> 14:24.240] So you can't give a court jurisdiction that it doesn't already have. [14:24.240 --> 14:26.200] So make sure you get your response in. [14:26.200 --> 14:27.200] Okay, that's enough. [14:27.200 --> 14:30.080] I think that's enough on summary and default. [14:30.080 --> 14:31.080] Does that make sense, Brett? [14:31.080 --> 14:32.080] Did I miss anything? [14:32.080 --> 14:35.080] Yeah, that makes sense. [14:35.080 --> 14:39.920] Just on that last point, you can't give a court jurisdiction that doesn't have, but [14:39.920 --> 14:46.640] you can waive that issue of jurisdiction by not addressing that. [14:46.640 --> 14:52.280] Yeah, you can waive it in personam. [14:52.280 --> 14:54.480] You can't waive subject matter. [14:54.480 --> 14:56.680] Or territorial, that's true. [14:56.680 --> 14:59.200] But you can waive personal jurisdiction. [14:59.200 --> 15:06.040] Yeah, by not bringing it up, by making a general appearance and not bringing up the issue that [15:06.040 --> 15:14.440] the court didn't have that jurisdiction, you can give them the impression that you think [15:14.440 --> 15:17.720] they have jurisdiction, and they will go right on ahead with it. [15:17.720 --> 15:25.080] Yeah, the judge doesn't really have jurisdiction, but there's nothing before him showing that [15:25.080 --> 15:26.720] he doesn't have jurisdiction. [15:26.720 --> 15:32.340] So they'll act like they have jurisdiction, and you'll feel like jurisdiction when they [15:32.340 --> 15:36.360] put you behind a can. [15:36.360 --> 15:39.360] So always respond. [15:39.360 --> 15:43.200] I just helped Mary Crinnick in a case she filed. [15:43.200 --> 15:49.920] She ran out of time and had, the judge gave her eight more days, and we made a response. [15:49.920 --> 15:51.680] It's about two paragraphs. [15:51.680 --> 15:58.200] It's all you need, just get some in there. [15:58.200 --> 16:04.520] Always answer, always show up in court. [16:04.520 --> 16:09.760] Failing to do either one of those could be catastrophic to your case. [16:09.760 --> 16:11.200] Fatal. [16:11.200 --> 16:16.160] Okay, we've got 45 seconds. [16:16.160 --> 16:21.680] Chris, say something really intuitive and insightful in 40 seconds. [16:21.680 --> 16:25.000] I've taken the bait. [16:25.000 --> 16:26.000] Thanks, Randy. [16:26.000 --> 16:30.040] You bailed out on me. [16:30.040 --> 16:33.120] Middle school poem, anything. [16:33.120 --> 16:34.120] Okay. [16:34.120 --> 16:37.640] Sorry about putting you on the dime there, Chris. [16:37.640 --> 16:41.480] I had too much time to the break, and I didn't have something to fill it in. [16:41.480 --> 16:44.200] So I should tell people the phone number. [16:44.200 --> 16:48.720] Oh, what's the phone number, Brett? [16:48.720 --> 16:49.720] 512-646-1984. [16:49.720 --> 16:55.920] You're trying to get me to fall off the cliff. [16:55.920 --> 17:00.200] Yes, we'll be right back. [17:00.200 --> 17:04.880] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [17:04.880 --> 17:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [17:09.000 --> 17:13.320] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you [17:13.320 --> 17:14.640] can win too. [17:14.640 --> 17:19.120] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [17:19.120 --> 17:20.800] civil rights statutes. [17:20.800 --> 17:24.480] What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons? [17:24.480 --> 17:26.520] How to answer letters and phone calls? [17:26.520 --> 17:29.120] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report? [17:29.120 --> 17:33.760] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? [17:33.760 --> 17:38.880] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [17:38.880 --> 17:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [17:41.000 --> 17:46.640] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, [17:46.640 --> 17:49.520] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [17:49.520 --> 17:50.520] That's ruleoflawradio.com. [17:50.520 --> 18:01.960] Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [18:01.960 --> 18:04.640] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [18:04.640 --> 18:08.480] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going [18:08.480 --> 18:12.440] to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [18:12.440 --> 18:15.640] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [18:15.640 --> 18:19.360] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [18:19.360 --> 18:23.520] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [18:23.520 --> 18:24.920] our rights through due process. [18:24.920 --> 18:28.880] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the [18:28.880 --> 18:32.640] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process [18:32.640 --> 18:35.040] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [18:35.040 --> 18:39.040] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [18:39.040 --> 18:40.360] ordering your copy today. [18:40.360 --> 18:43.600] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [18:43.600 --> 18:48.120] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [18:48.120 --> 18:50.400] documents and other useful resource material. [18:50.400 --> 18:54.360] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [18:54.360 --> 19:24.120] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [19:24.120 --> 19:25.120] You know what I mean? [19:25.120 --> 19:26.120] My friend. [19:26.120 --> 19:27.120] Knowledge your children. [19:27.120 --> 19:28.120] Come on. [19:28.120 --> 19:29.120] Trust in God, me friend. [19:29.120 --> 19:30.120] Tell him your problem's been. [19:30.120 --> 19:31.120] Call on his name once again. [19:31.120 --> 19:32.120] He will tell you now he worth it. [19:32.120 --> 19:33.120] Trust in God, me friend. [19:33.120 --> 19:34.120] Tell him your problem's been. [19:34.120 --> 19:35.120] Call on his name once again. [19:35.120 --> 20:02.200] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Shane [20:02.200 --> 20:12.160] in New York. Hello, Shane. Hey, Randy. How are you doing? Doing good. How is your case [20:12.160 --> 20:19.760] going? Shane has been holding off a bankruptcy for how many years now? Well, it's actually [20:19.760 --> 20:27.480] a foreclosure. I know. I'm sorry. But yeah, a foreclosure. And I said that wrong. We started [20:27.480 --> 20:34.800] out with foreclosure and then almost got to the end and you file bankruptcy to block it. [20:34.800 --> 20:43.080] And how many years have you been fighting them so far? 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, seven [20:43.080 --> 20:54.040] years. Seven years. So now where are we? Now we're in the bankruptcy. Wait, wait, wait [20:54.040 --> 21:00.440] till you hear this. Okay. All seven appeals in my bankruptcy, which by the way was dismissed [21:00.440 --> 21:05.160] because I wasn't making any mortgage payments, but how can I make mortgage payments when [21:05.160 --> 21:11.880] I don't even have a loan with KeyBank or Nationstar? So all those been fully briefed and filed [21:11.880 --> 21:16.520] in the United States District Court in Western District in New York, all briefed since March [21:16.520 --> 21:26.280] of 2020. Since then, since then it's that the County Court is sitting on six motions, [21:26.280 --> 21:30.160] which is actually my mother's name, because you know, the house and loan was her name [21:30.160 --> 21:38.640] originally and I did the quick claim in 2017. That's how I got involved. So has the court [21:38.640 --> 21:49.400] granted you standing? No, the County Court denied it. But the bankruptcy court is admitted [21:49.400 --> 21:54.400] and stipulated and agreed that that property is yours, but you need to go back to state [21:54.400 --> 22:00.120] court and litigate this, not here in bankruptcy court. So therefore your motion to lift this [22:00.120 --> 22:09.560] Wait a minute, litigate this. What did this refer to? The issue of them trying to illegally [22:09.560 --> 22:14.080] foreclose on a property with no note and many other issues, which I'm not going to get into [22:14.080 --> 22:21.880] right now. Okay. Okay. So I want to tell you what I did. Okay, go ahead. So let me just [22:21.880 --> 22:27.360] say what happened. Let me just say what happened for what I did. Um, mistakenly somebody from [22:27.360 --> 22:32.120] the clerk's office, that's good friends with me that works down there in the, in the library, [22:32.120 --> 22:35.920] called me up. He says, did you know your house is up for sale on April the 18th of 2022? [22:35.920 --> 22:40.120] I says, get out of here. We had six motions in the County Court haven't been ruled on [22:40.120 --> 22:45.000] that. One of them are going to be granted. All right. And I, and I said, it's impossible. [22:45.000 --> 22:48.400] There's no notices on the board. There's no notices on a docket sheet. Cause I go down [22:48.400 --> 22:51.560] there like once a week to contract the docket sheet. Cause you can't get it online. You [22:51.560 --> 22:56.040] have to go into the courthouse and look at it. Cause they're all old fashioned paperback. [22:56.040 --> 23:01.080] So what County, what County is this? Oh, I'm sorry. You're in New York state. Is that [23:01.080 --> 23:04.920] common in New York state or is that unique to the County? [23:04.920 --> 23:09.480] No, they always post stuff and give you post. They always post stuff on the docket sheet. [23:09.480 --> 23:13.200] Notice of foreclosure sale all the time. And they give you the, you know, I think it's [23:13.200 --> 23:16.600] 30 or maybe it's 31 days. They have to give you notice. We never got no notice. I had [23:16.600 --> 23:20.160] mistakenly found out from somebody in the clerk's office. I asked him to keep an eye [23:20.160 --> 23:23.200] on it and he's just whipping through the magazine. It's a small little Buffalo law [23:23.200 --> 23:29.200] journal only for attorneys. And they, I guess they started publicizing it back in March [23:29.200 --> 23:36.280] and I mistakenly found out about it. So I had Randy, I had my lawsuit against KeyBank [23:36.280 --> 23:38.840] cause they're the ones that are selling the property, the second lien holder. Cause the [23:38.840 --> 23:43.400] first lien holder got indicted, but I had the lawsuit I've been working on for two years [23:43.400 --> 23:49.960] and I wouldn't file. I finally filed it last week, Monday, and you had it served properly [23:49.960 --> 23:56.720] served. It's all on the docket sheet. I have a lawsuit file against every, I think 30 officers [23:56.720 --> 24:03.160] for KeyBank and all four attorneys. And it was all served and paid for the index number. [24:03.160 --> 24:08.280] The traditional request is $95 to get a judge appointed to it. And it's all sitting on a [24:08.280 --> 24:13.600] dock and everybody served as of, I think as of Wednesday of this week, everything is served [24:13.600 --> 24:20.240] now they have to answer it. Now, my question to you is congratulations motions. Hang out. [24:20.240 --> 24:29.080] We have six motions at the Erie County court. My mom, my mom's name. Okay. Nothing, no rulings, [24:29.080 --> 24:33.480] even as of this very second, I'm talking to you on the phone, no rulings. Okay. Have you [24:33.480 --> 24:41.400] gotten it put before the court? They're ignoring us. And we, I call the judicial complaint. [24:41.400 --> 24:50.360] Yeah, go ahead. I wanted to say Mike said it for hearing. Yeah. Contact the court coordinator [24:50.360 --> 24:57.160] and they'll call it the judge. Sometimes they call it the court's clerk, but we did that. [24:57.160 --> 25:05.880] And sometimes they've got several different names you hear for it, but we did that. We [25:05.880 --> 25:12.120] contacted the secretary and the law court asking very kindly for a hearing and they did get [25:12.120 --> 25:17.680] an email back last week saying they will set up a zoom hearing. And that was like Tuesday [25:17.680 --> 25:21.800] of last week, but nothing, nothing we haven't heard from anything from anybody this time. [25:21.800 --> 25:27.040] Now, of course, you know. Okay, hold on. Let me make a comment to everybody else. When [25:27.040 --> 25:32.840] you're in court and you file a motion or a pleading, don't expect it to automatically [25:32.840 --> 25:39.500] go before the judge or the prosecutor. Don't expect it to do what it's supposed to. So [25:39.500 --> 25:45.100] always request that they do. Like when I file motions and pleadings, I generally put a cover [25:45.100 --> 25:56.520] letter on them that directs the clerk to give notice to the judge of the filing. [25:56.520 --> 26:01.840] We've had motions just disappear in the system and we've got case law that in Texas it says, [26:01.840 --> 26:09.600] well, if you didn't request that the clerk give notice to the judge, then there's no [26:09.600 --> 26:19.120] way the judge would necessarily have any knowledge of this at all. So put in a request that whoever [26:19.120 --> 26:29.080] gets this gives notice to the judge that it's here so we can set it on the docket for hearing. [26:29.080 --> 26:33.760] Otherwise it can just sit there and languish forever. Does that make sense? Right. Shane? [26:33.760 --> 26:43.040] Yes. Yeah. As of right now, the sale is supposed to take place April the 18th, but I filed [26:43.040 --> 26:47.960] a lawsuit against KeyBank and by the way, it's absolutely fantastic, Randy. It's about [26:47.960 --> 26:53.480] 41 pages and it detailed everything, what they're doing and back up a case law and everything [26:53.480 --> 26:57.840] like that. So I also want to say one more thing. Two years ago, I filed a fair debt [26:57.840 --> 27:05.120] collection practices lawsuit against all the officers at KeyBank and all the attorneys. [27:05.120 --> 27:08.760] And it sat there for two years because informal paupers, they were just sitting on it. So [27:08.760 --> 27:13.320] I went ahead and paid the filing fee for that, got everybody served within a matter of a [27:13.320 --> 27:18.120] week. So now they got the federal lawsuit in my name against KeyBank and all the officers [27:18.120 --> 27:24.480] and the state lawsuit, which is now my question to you. Obviously I should probably file a [27:24.480 --> 27:28.280] lawsuit in the state court to try to stop the sale of the property, but- [27:28.280 --> 27:36.400] Okay, hold on. For those who don't know, TRO is Temporary Restraining Order. Go ahead. [27:36.400 --> 27:41.280] Yeah. So my question to you, will they still proceed and move forward with the sale of [27:41.280 --> 27:43.280] the property? [27:43.280 --> 27:51.840] They, who is selling the property? Is this the county sheriff or the other case? Is KeyBank [27:51.840 --> 27:59.960] selling the property? It's hard to say. Generally, no. Especially if you're going after them. [27:59.960 --> 28:12.560] If they do anything like hold hearings, if they do anything, I'm losing my place. Where [28:12.560 --> 28:16.920] was I, Shane? I guess I'm getting tired. It's been a real long day. [28:16.920 --> 28:21.520] Well, basically I just want to find out, is the TRO overdoing it? I'm going to file it [28:21.520 --> 28:27.000] anyways, but I have no idea how they're going to proceed. And by the way, this is all triggered [28:27.000 --> 28:33.000] by the referee that's very good friends with the county court judge, so you know. [28:33.000 --> 28:38.840] Have you filed anything against the referee to get his attention? [28:38.840 --> 28:43.280] She's in a lawsuit. She's already in a lawsuit. [28:43.280 --> 28:44.280] Okay, then she- [28:44.280 --> 28:46.160] Yes, we got her. We got her. [28:46.160 --> 28:51.320] Yeah, she's likely, once you point it out, they're likely to be more careful. [28:51.320 --> 28:52.600] What's that? [28:52.600 --> 29:00.400] So once you point out, they're likely to be more careful. If you don't point things out, [29:00.400 --> 29:05.160] they just ignore law. They do whatever they want to. But if they know you're going to [29:05.160 --> 29:08.640] fight them, they tend to be more careful. [29:08.640 --> 29:16.360] Right. So I guess what I was going to ask you, how much time we got left on the segment, [29:16.360 --> 29:17.360] Brandy? [29:17.360 --> 29:19.440] On the segment, 40 seconds. [29:19.440 --> 29:24.480] Okay, I'll just throw a question out there. We'll wrap it up. But my question to you, [29:24.480 --> 29:30.360] I have two incredible lawsuits in my name, because I own the property. And my argument [29:30.360 --> 29:39.360] is I've never been served, and I haven't had the opportunity to have rulings on America. [29:39.360 --> 29:49.960] Okay, so never been served, have a right to ruling on the marriage. You don't have a right [29:49.960 --> 29:53.840] to ruling on the marriage if you've never been served, because court cases never actually [29:53.840 --> 30:01.200] commenced. Did you get constructive notice? [30:01.200 --> 30:05.600] Everyone knows that walking is great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk [30:05.600 --> 30:09.840] could predict how long you're going to live. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back [30:09.840 --> 30:14.640] to tell you more about walking prognostication in just a moment. [30:14.640 --> 30:19.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back [30:19.000 --> 30:24.600] again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:24.600 --> 30:30.760] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, [30:30.760 --> 30:35.920] it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [30:35.920 --> 30:43.480] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. [30:43.480 --> 30:47.920] New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live. The [30:47.920 --> 30:52.480] Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter [30:52.480 --> 30:57.720] per second or faster live longer than expected. In case you're wondering, one meter per second [30:57.720 --> 31:02.600] is about two and a quarter miles per hour. A senior's age, gender, and walking speed [31:02.600 --> 31:07.160] were as good at predicting life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures. [31:07.160 --> 31:12.960] Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer. Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive. [31:12.960 --> 31:17.320] It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk, and a few minutes. Researchers say it could [31:17.320 --> 31:20.880] help doctors identify older patients who need special care. [31:20.880 --> 31:27.880] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:50.880 --> 31:55.440] There is more to the story. Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. Go [31:55.440 --> 32:01.480] to buildingwatt.org. Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [32:01.480 --> 32:05.880] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [32:05.880 --> 32:11.360] Word? Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time [32:11.360 --> 32:16.760] for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy [32:16.760 --> 32:22.560] 2.15. Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, [32:22.560 --> 32:27.400] rightly dividing the word of truth. Starting in January, our first hour studies [32:27.400 --> 32:31.600] are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel [32:31.600 --> 32:37.280] message. Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [32:37.280 --> 32:42.000] and Christian character development. We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing [32:42.000 --> 32:46.800] to all those with a hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform [32:46.800 --> 32:51.720] ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. So tune in to Scripture [32:51.720 --> 32:57.920] Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com, Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate [32:57.920 --> 33:02.520] your studies of the Scriptures. [33:02.520 --> 33:09.520] And free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [33:32.520 --> 33:53.520] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Root of the Radio. And Shane, we're talking [33:53.520 --> 34:02.840] to Shane in New York. Shane, so give us a close up, a wrap up before you're at. [34:02.840 --> 34:09.960] Well here's the wrap up. I got the lawsuit in federal court that was originally filed [34:09.960 --> 34:15.160] two years ago, has now been filed and I paid the filing fee and properly served everybody. [34:15.160 --> 34:19.280] That's the fair debt collection practice lawsuit. By the way, it's absolutely smashing. Number [34:19.280 --> 34:26.000] two, the state court complaint for wrongful foreclosure actions, you know, under like [34:26.000 --> 34:32.640] a tort claim, like an injury against me. That was all properly filed and served and that's [34:32.640 --> 34:37.960] all on the e-filing system in the state of New York. And it's again, it's allegations [34:37.960 --> 34:46.160] of forged documents, falsifying so many things, but more importantly, it's a second lien holder [34:46.160 --> 34:50.680] trying to sell a property jumping over the first lien holder, which I've never heard [34:50.680 --> 34:56.400] that happening. I guess it does happen. And they forged documents that they have the original [34:56.400 --> 34:59.600] note, which they've already admitted in the bankruptcy court. They don't have the original [34:59.600 --> 35:05.840] note and there's no bond under UCC 3804. You're supposed to have a bond double the amount [35:05.840 --> 35:11.960] of the value of the loan. And they're trying to sell a property for $59,000 where the value [35:11.960 --> 35:21.840] of the property is roughly around $325,000. Wow. This is the, your mother's place in New [35:21.840 --> 35:27.400] York. Right. Isn't that a relatively small property? [35:27.400 --> 35:35.680] No, it's four acres, four acres. It's got a pond. It's about 3000 square feet. Okay. [35:35.680 --> 35:41.800] Because the prices in New York are really depressed right now. I was thinking of this [35:41.800 --> 35:47.000] head in my head that is a real small place. Apparently it's not so small. If you've got [35:47.000 --> 35:55.720] that kind of value on it. Right. Okay. What else do you have for us? [35:55.720 --> 36:02.760] Well, that's pretty much about it. My only question is, is that do I have enough time [36:02.760 --> 36:06.760] or do you think you're going to move forward with the sale of the property? And if there's [36:06.760 --> 36:11.840] anything else that I can do to stop the sale of the property? [36:11.840 --> 36:17.480] Anytime you file a motion or pleading, that will generally stop the sale of the property. [36:17.480 --> 36:22.680] Right. They don't want to risk selling that property [36:22.680 --> 36:30.120] and then the new owner do something to the property and you wind up getting it back. [36:30.120 --> 36:37.000] And they definitely don't want to put that money out there where they might not get it [36:37.000 --> 36:44.680] back. Right. So it was my experience when I was helping people with foreclosure issues [36:44.680 --> 36:51.480] that some 90 some percent of the people just walk away and they can just go ahead with [36:51.480 --> 37:03.480] the foreclosure. It's a small percentage that fight them. So they expect you not to do anything. [37:03.480 --> 37:08.800] So that's why they tend to do such stupid stuff. When you fight them, it's going to [37:08.800 --> 37:15.920] bring their cost up and generally gives you an opportunity to make a deal with them. That's [37:15.920 --> 37:20.320] the only way you win in the end. And you're in a good place to come to them and say, Hey, [37:20.320 --> 37:24.640] you know, if I give you X amount of dollars and stop beating you up, will you make this [37:24.640 --> 37:25.640] go away? [37:25.640 --> 37:30.240] I take it your mom is still living in the property? [37:30.240 --> 37:35.600] Yeah, I want to tell you one more thing, Randy. I'm sorry. I missed what you said. What did [37:35.600 --> 37:36.600] you say again? [37:36.600 --> 37:40.040] I said, is your mom still living in the property? [37:40.040 --> 37:43.560] Oh, yes. Yes. [37:43.560 --> 37:51.280] And that puts a lot of stress on the mom. But it also blocks them from doing anything. [37:51.280 --> 37:57.320] So as long as you've been in, have you tried to talk to them about a deal to make this [37:57.320 --> 37:58.320] go away? [37:58.320 --> 38:03.760] I was just ready to tell you that. During my bankruptcy proceeding, David P. Case sent [38:03.760 --> 38:09.200] me a letter for an offer and settlement that he would settle for a $44,000 cashier's check [38:09.200 --> 38:17.040] right in the middle of my bankruptcy. And that's attached to the letter because that's [38:17.040 --> 38:22.040] in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act in state court. He was doing it right [38:22.040 --> 38:24.520] in the middle of my bankruptcy court trying to make a deal with me. And he sent me the [38:24.520 --> 38:29.760] letter by US mail. And I attached that and I had as an exhibit of the new lawsuit that [38:29.760 --> 38:30.760] was just filed last week. [38:30.760 --> 38:39.560] I could say one more thing. I want to say one more thing too. In the home equity line [38:39.560 --> 38:46.040] of credit, subtitle A, I think it's called, will be TLOC. They stated that they are the [38:46.040 --> 38:51.120] first lien holder of this property, which is a fat lie because they're the second lien [38:51.120 --> 38:54.720] holder and it's a home equity line of credit. [38:54.720 --> 39:00.480] Has the first lien holder been involved in any of this? [39:00.480 --> 39:06.440] Yes, and they just basically stopped when Rosicky got indicted back in 2018 cuz they're [39:06.440 --> 39:11.760] in the process of selling the property. And then they got indicted and the whole law firm [39:11.760 --> 39:14.480] got shut down. Key Binks and- [39:14.480 --> 39:18.400] That was Rosecky and Rosecky? [39:18.400 --> 39:23.480] Right. They paid a $8 million fine to the government. [39:23.480 --> 39:30.640] Yeah, that's probably about a tenth of a percent of what they stole. [39:30.640 --> 39:33.080] Right. That's correct. Yes. [39:33.080 --> 39:40.040] I think that's why there's so much of it going on because there's no effective rebuttal [39:40.040 --> 39:44.120] to defend. Wrong word. [39:44.120 --> 39:51.080] It doesn't cost them as much as they made on it. [39:51.080 --> 39:53.800] Okay, is that all Shane? [39:53.800 --> 40:01.000] Yeah, so in conclusion and wrap it all up is that my question to you in your opinion, [40:01.000 --> 40:04.840] do you think that they're gonna still try to sell the property? And is there, you know, [40:04.840 --> 40:05.840] leave it aside- [40:05.840 --> 40:13.000] Okay, it has been my experience and that was only violated one time where a guy in Florida [40:13.000 --> 40:19.320] bought a house at a foreclosure auction and was living there with his girlfriend and her [40:19.320 --> 40:24.000] 16 year old daughter and he took photographs of the daughter in the shower from the outside [40:24.000 --> 40:28.560] window they caught him. They threw him in jail. Well, they were in the process of throwing [40:28.560 --> 40:37.040] him in jail and the property went up for foreclosure. He filed suit to stop them. They sold it anyway [40:37.040 --> 40:42.040] and generally when that happens, you know, if I'm helping people, I give them a folder [40:42.040 --> 40:46.160] and when you go down to the auction and when they call your property, hold up this folder, [40:46.160 --> 40:50.480] it's generally a red folder and we tell them there's a claim against the property, you [40:50.480 --> 40:57.480] buy the property, you buy the claim and nobody would purchase. But in this case, somebody [40:57.480 --> 41:07.120] did and the reason they did was this was the guy who bought it at auction and sold it to [41:07.120 --> 41:17.400] the guy that has it now. He bought it back at auction. But that was the only time that [41:17.400 --> 41:27.000] the bank moved ahead once an action was filed. Some 96% of the population just walk away [41:27.000 --> 41:29.240] from the property. They don't fight it. [41:29.240 --> 41:30.240] Right. [41:30.240 --> 41:39.600] There's a small percentage and that makes it difficult because the banks have all of [41:39.600 --> 41:46.920] these derivative contracts on the property. Wells Fargo accused China, I'm sorry, China [41:46.920 --> 41:53.440] accused Wells Fargo of selling them the same property 60 times. [41:53.440 --> 41:54.440] Right. [41:54.440 --> 42:01.600] Now, the problem you have with getting a foreclosure is if Bank of America has sold your loan 60 [42:01.600 --> 42:09.480] times, they're paying on 60 mortgages. They need to do that for 15 years and then they [42:09.480 --> 42:17.160] need you to default so they can sell the property. When they sell the property for each time [42:17.160 --> 42:24.600] they've resold your property, they got an insurance policy, a mortgage insurance policy [42:24.600 --> 42:37.040] on it. It'll pay 85% of the original value of the property. So they got these 60 mortgages [42:37.040 --> 42:40.000] and they're paying on each one of them. [42:40.000 --> 42:48.840] But you're the key. If you default, then all of these properties default and the bank gets [42:48.840 --> 42:59.560] to collect their default insurance, their mortgage insurance. If you don't foreclose, [42:59.560 --> 43:06.340] they can't collect on all these 60 properties they sold. And then every month the payment [43:06.340 --> 43:13.240] comes due and they have to pay that payment. It will eat up any potential property. It [43:13.240 --> 43:24.560] will eat up any potential profit having to pay these mortgages. So they need you to default. [43:24.560 --> 43:29.520] Then they get the insurance companies to pay all this off and they have this huge stack [43:29.520 --> 43:37.360] of money they get to steal. There have been some laws against that, but not enough to [43:37.360 --> 43:43.360] stop it. So we're likely to have another foreclosure like that. If these guys are going to lose [43:43.360 --> 43:50.160] 60 times the value of your mortgage if they can't foreclose, they're going to force you [43:50.160 --> 43:56.280] to foreclose and they'll pay off the judges and get it done. Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett [43:56.280 --> 44:00.600] Fountain, we'll have our radio. We'll be right back. [44:00.600 --> 44:05.200] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [44:05.200 --> 44:09.920] of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we [44:09.920 --> 44:16.040] changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment [44:16.040 --> 44:21.200] is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and [44:21.200 --> 44:27.880] mutilated, YoungGevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests [44:27.880 --> 44:33.240] to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust YoungGevity [44:33.240 --> 44:39.120] so much we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many [44:39.120 --> 44:46.000] others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [44:46.000 --> 44:51.960] quality radio. As you realize the benefits of YoungGevity, you may want to join us. As [44:51.960 --> 44:57.200] a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [44:57.200 --> 45:01.120] increase your income. Order now. [45:01.120 --> 45:07.520] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with JurisDictionary, [45:07.520 --> 45:14.200] the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by [45:14.200 --> 45:19.920] step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have [45:19.920 --> 45:26.160] a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, [45:26.160 --> 45:33.160] and now you can too. JurisDictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning [45:33.160 --> 45:38.960] experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [45:38.960 --> 45:44.680] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio [45:44.680 --> 45:51.480] classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much [45:51.480 --> 46:10.080] more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [46:10.080 --> 46:40.000] Okay, Shane. We are back. [46:40.000 --> 46:47.480] Yeah. Well, yeah, I pretty much, Randy, I just, all I really wanted to do is let you [46:47.480 --> 46:55.440] know what's going on. And we did add the referee, a very ignorant referee, by the way. Okay. [46:55.440 --> 46:58.800] I mean, she just laughs at me and says, none of your stuff's going to work. You're going [46:58.800 --> 47:02.920] to end up losing a property. I'm paying for damages. And she's very cocky and arrogant, [47:02.920 --> 47:06.720] but that's how attorneys are. And I, you know, hey, if I was one, I might be, I might be [47:06.720 --> 47:10.240] too, because they know they're going to get away with it, but I'm doing everything I can [47:10.240 --> 47:15.120] on my end. I filed a bar grievance against them. I filed a judicial complaint against [47:15.120 --> 47:20.640] the county judge. And they don't care about the truth. They don't get, you're right. That's [47:20.640 --> 47:24.080] all about the money. And the insurance thing is something I heard about before. And I think [47:24.080 --> 47:25.960] it was you told me about this years ago. [47:25.960 --> 47:29.440] Yeah, these derivative insurance policies. [47:29.440 --> 47:35.320] Yes. Right. In fact, since you brought that up, the first time I heard it, you were on [47:35.320 --> 47:41.280] the Alex Jones show, I think it was like 10 years ago, long time ago, explaining exactly [47:41.280 --> 47:44.240] how it works. And that's what really woke me up. [47:44.240 --> 47:46.240] Good, good. [47:46.240 --> 47:53.360] So, in conclusion, I don't think there's anything else I can do except maybe file a TRO, temporary [47:53.360 --> 47:59.360] restraining order, in the state court. And just let's see how things pan out, I guess. [47:59.360 --> 48:01.640] I don't know what's going to happen. [48:01.640 --> 48:06.240] Okay, that's what, that was my case and most of the cases I help people with and never [48:06.240 --> 48:14.800] knew what they were going to pull. So it should be interesting. Okay, Shayna, thank you, Randy. [48:14.800 --> 48:20.920] Thank you for calling. Now we're going to go to Tina in California. Hello, Miss Tina. [48:20.920 --> 48:22.920] What do you have for us today? [48:22.920 --> 48:39.240] While she's adjusting her audio, let me ask you, Randy, about those derivatives, derivative [48:39.240 --> 48:45.760] insurance. Is that something, do those get reported in any kind of way to a governmental [48:45.760 --> 48:48.360] body where we can do a records request? [48:48.360 --> 49:01.200] I don't know, but I seriously doubt it. You have never heard of a body that gets reported [49:01.200 --> 49:05.800] to you. You would think that the insurance information is open records, but it's apparently [49:05.800 --> 49:11.360] not. You can find it, but you have to really dig for it. Actually, where you find it is [49:11.360 --> 49:18.560] in the county recorder's office. You have to look at each one and see if they have ruled [49:18.560 --> 49:24.160] against or for the person. I've talked to Dr. Joe and he's going to help me build a [49:24.160 --> 49:35.800] tool that will help to analyze these issues in a pretty sophisticated way, but I haven't [49:35.800 --> 49:42.120] got to it yet. It's like most of the stuff I'm doing. Okay, go ahead, Tina. [49:42.120 --> 49:45.080] You there, Tina? [49:45.080 --> 49:47.720] Yes, I'm here. [49:47.720 --> 49:51.600] Okay, you got that Bluetooth off. Good. [49:51.600 --> 49:58.000] Yes, I got the Bluetooth off. A couple of things, one in reference to what Shane was [49:58.000 --> 50:04.160] just saying and you were saying, it was my experience and I may be different because [50:04.160 --> 50:11.720] of the bank I was with. When I went to a sale of my property and I took all the documents [50:11.720 --> 50:15.960] and showed that I had a case and they said, we don't care about that. They said, we [50:15.960 --> 50:20.360] have attorneys and they'll just override this. We don't care. It doesn't matter to [50:20.360 --> 50:25.360] us, which I thought was very interesting. Then I talked to someone else and they said [50:25.360 --> 50:31.480] the same thing to them. Now that might be comic cornea, but I think Shane should file [50:31.480 --> 50:35.480] a TRO just in case. [50:35.480 --> 50:39.920] It's hard to get a TRO unless there's an underlying litigation. [50:39.920 --> 50:47.760] That's true. You have to have a litigation to get one. But it depends on the state, I [50:47.760 --> 50:52.840] think, as to how aggressive these people are and how they know if the attorneys can get [50:52.840 --> 50:57.600] around the judges. And we all know that California is one of the worst. Anyway, that's just my [50:57.600 --> 51:04.200] two cents worth for Shane and my experience. But today I have an interesting thing with [51:04.200 --> 51:11.600] the timeless treasures, the confinement store that we have under the gun in an adversary [51:11.600 --> 51:19.440] proceeding within her bankruptcy. And remember the last time I said we had a new judge who [51:19.440 --> 51:27.160] reamed her in the hearing and he ordered us all to be in the courtroom next time because [51:27.160 --> 51:36.200] she refuses to put on her video in the zoo. Now at the last hearing, he specifically asked [51:36.200 --> 51:45.920] her in detail, did you file anything to the IRS in 2016? And he went through each year [51:45.920 --> 51:53.600] and she muttered, well, yeah, I did this. I filed. It was an amendment or it was this. [51:53.600 --> 51:58.880] And she mumbled, he said, and in his order, he said, there are going to be no more games [51:58.880 --> 52:05.160] in my courtroom. And he ordered, his order says, defendant shall forward the aforementioned [52:05.160 --> 52:15.240] documents. Oh, and the documents are forward any and all documents submitted to any taxing [52:15.240 --> 52:25.400] authority for the tax years 2016, 17, 18 and 19 by defendant or on defendant's behalf [52:25.400 --> 52:33.840] for personal tax purposes, as well as any business defendant owned in the years 16 through [52:33.840 --> 52:40.120] 19 or had an interest in. Defendants shall forward the aforementioned documents to plaintiffs [52:40.120 --> 52:47.080] through either certified mail with a return receipt or express overnight delivery, i.e. [52:47.080 --> 52:56.400] FedEx, UPS or DHL signature required upon delivery. Okay. He was very specific about [52:56.400 --> 53:02.160] that. And he said, and if any one of these plaintiffs say they didn't get it, one of [53:02.160 --> 53:13.080] the others will email it to them. And so today, and he gave it to April 8th, which was today. [53:13.080 --> 53:20.760] So today we get things in the mail. The only person who has to sign for it is me. And that [53:20.760 --> 53:29.080] is because I gave a UPS address, which is the package is too big to go into my box. [53:29.080 --> 53:35.480] You have to sign for it. Now the envelope that came in, normally if it says, doesn't [53:35.480 --> 53:42.160] say signature required. The others got it dumped on their doorstep. So no signature [53:42.160 --> 53:52.280] was required. In this package is three, you know, stapled documents, and it's timeless [53:52.280 --> 54:01.960] treasures P&L. Next year, whatever 2016 and expenses spelled with a C. And so she doesn't [54:01.960 --> 54:07.080] even know how to spell that. And at the bottom, it says total expenses, total amount received. [54:07.080 --> 54:16.720] I'm just taking, you know, one food for Phil and Andrea, $2,000, exactly $2,000 each month [54:16.720 --> 54:25.320] for the whole year. Your personal food is not supposed to be on a P&L. You know, personal [54:25.320 --> 54:33.280] rent, it says. And so my, she has not, this was not filed with the IRS. There's no filing [54:33.280 --> 54:39.920] stamp. There is no signature on it. It's just a simple, very, very simple spreadsheet. Two [54:39.920 --> 54:48.960] columns, one that says who it is or what it is. And then the other, the amount. My thought [54:48.960 --> 55:01.680] is to send a declaration to the court to state that on April 8th, plaintiffs received a three [55:01.680 --> 55:10.760] P&Ls. She's nothing for 2019, only for three years. And there is no personal detail on [55:10.760 --> 55:16.880] it. There's no, you know, there's not even a name, a business name. There's no social [55:16.880 --> 55:21.280] security number. There's no identifying information. [55:21.280 --> 55:26.080] And also it's not something that's been filed with these. That was the very first thing [55:26.080 --> 55:32.080] he says. He says anything that's been filed with these taxing authorities. So what difference [55:32.080 --> 55:37.560] does it make if she produces something else that wasn't filed? Here's my favorite toilet [55:37.560 --> 55:41.120] paper. Here's my neighbor's favorite toilet paper. [55:41.120 --> 55:50.280] Well, she's, and he did say, right at the start, he said, I get really grumpy if people [55:50.280 --> 55:59.000] don't take notice of my orders. So my thought is I don't want to, if I file it, you know, [55:59.000 --> 56:04.000] through this special filing thing, I've got it automatically goes onto PACER. Now I don't [56:04.000 --> 56:08.960] want to incur the wrath of the judge by filing something with all these figures on, even [56:08.960 --> 56:15.880] though there's no identifying information. My thought is to just say, here's the declaration. [56:15.880 --> 56:22.560] This is what we received. It is not compliant with the judge's order of and the date his [56:22.560 --> 56:28.800] order is. Only one person had to sign for it because the package was too big for the [56:28.800 --> 56:39.680] box. And then just say, plaintiffs will forward this to the judge if he so requests before [56:39.680 --> 56:46.080] the status conference hearing, because we'd like him to get a look at it well ahead of [56:46.080 --> 56:50.920] time, but I don't want to file it because if I do, it automatically goes to PACER. [56:50.920 --> 56:55.960] Don't you get an option for when you're e-filing, you get an option for checking the box that's [56:55.960 --> 57:06.360] for in-camera. So the judge gets the opportunity to review it in chambers without it being [57:06.360 --> 57:14.120] public? No, not with a pro se litigants in bankruptcy [57:14.120 --> 57:20.800] court, at least our bankruptcy court, you do not have that option. You have a special [57:20.800 --> 57:28.800] drop box link that you have to apply for to be able to file by online instead of mailing [57:28.800 --> 57:40.640] it in. And anything you file goes automatically to PACER. So I don't want to file it and incur [57:40.640 --> 57:48.080] the rough because it does have financial information on, but it's worthless. I mean, you can't [57:48.080 --> 57:58.760] have a P&L from 2016 that says your food expenses were exactly 2000 each month. That's a projection. [57:58.760 --> 58:07.560] That's not an actual, right? I have no idea what that would be useful for. [58:07.560 --> 58:15.880] Somebody serves 17 raisins per minute or something. So it's my idea of just filing a declaration [58:15.880 --> 58:20.920] stating this is what we received. It's not compliant with the judge's order, but we will [58:20.920 --> 58:25.200] forward it to the court if they so request. Otherwise we will bring it to the status conference [58:25.200 --> 58:29.680] too. Makes sense to me. What do you think, Brandy? [58:29.680 --> 58:37.160] Does that make sense? Seemed like a good way to do it. He's waiting. He wants to jump off [58:37.160 --> 58:43.040] the cliff. Yeah, I think he does. Somebody snuck up and [58:43.040 --> 58:46.840] muted my voice. Who would do such a thing? [58:46.840 --> 58:52.440] It is a strange phenomenon. Would you like to make more definite progress [58:52.440 --> 58:56.840] in your walk with God? Bibles for America is offering a free study [58:56.840 --> 59:02.000] Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help. The New Testament Recovery [59:02.000 --> 59:07.480] Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation [59:07.480 --> 59:11.760] and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the [59:11.760 --> 59:15.840] meaning of life. The free books are a three-volume set called [59:15.840 --> 59:20.860] Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian [59:20.860 --> 59:26.840] Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the [59:26.840 --> 59:29.880] Church. To order your free New Testament Recovery [59:29.880 --> 59:36.440] Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at [59:36.440 --> 01:00:02.200] 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:00:02.200 --> 01:00:06.960] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. They guarantee the specific [01:00:06.960 --> 01:00:10.800] freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it. [01:00:10.800 --> 01:00:14.720] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:00:14.720 --> 01:00:19.720] one of your constitutional rights. Privacy is under attack. When you give up [01:00:19.720 --> 01:00:24.580] data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll [01:00:24.580 --> 01:00:30.320] find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance [01:00:30.320 --> 01:00:35.320] and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [01:00:35.320 --> 01:00:39.600] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [01:00:39.600 --> 01:00:46.600] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage. [01:00:46.600 --> 01:00:50.500] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers and find [01:00:50.500 --> 01:00:55.220] a third party there. He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. [01:00:55.220 --> 01:00:59.360] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment [01:00:59.360 --> 01:01:04.200] was designed to prevent. It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, [01:01:04.200 --> 01:01:07.280] a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. [01:01:07.280 --> 01:01:11.600] Third party? Third Amendment? Get it? So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in [01:01:11.600 --> 01:01:15.960] fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and re-read [01:01:15.960 --> 01:01:19.800] the Third Amendment. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information [01:01:19.800 --> 01:01:33.720] at CatherineAlbrecht.com. The Bill of Rights contains the first ten [01:01:33.720 --> 01:01:38.080] amendments of our Constitution. They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know [01:01:38.080 --> 01:01:42.320] and protect. Our liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right [01:01:42.320 --> 01:01:47.440] back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:01:47.440 --> 01:01:51.800] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back [01:01:51.800 --> 01:01:57.400] again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:01:57.400 --> 01:02:03.560] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, [01:02:03.560 --> 01:02:08.720] it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:02:08.720 --> 01:02:16.680] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage. [01:02:16.680 --> 01:02:22.040] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles. [01:02:22.040 --> 01:02:26.520] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable [01:02:26.520 --> 01:02:31.160] search and seizure. Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it? [01:02:31.160 --> 01:02:34.480] Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of [01:02:34.480 --> 01:02:40.360] security. Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. When government [01:02:40.360 --> 01:02:44.920] employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound [01:02:44.920 --> 01:02:49.360] the constitutional alarm bells. Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the [01:02:49.360 --> 01:02:54.640] Bill of Rights and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. I'm Dr. Catherine [01:02:54.640 --> 01:03:15.920] Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:03:15.920 --> 01:03:33.600] Good morning, good morning, good morning. I will light up my father's house until he [01:03:33.600 --> 01:03:44.960] returns. He has loved me with his strength and wisdom. He will help me find my father's [01:03:44.960 --> 01:04:10.480] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Google our radio, and Brett just told me it's [01:04:10.480 --> 01:04:17.560] top of the hour so I can say the date. But he forgot to remind me of what day it was. [01:04:17.560 --> 01:04:31.840] Oh, my bad. We are back with our radio on this Friday, the 8th day of April 2022. And we're [01:04:31.840 --> 01:04:34.360] talking to Tina in California. Okay, where are we, Tina? [01:04:34.360 --> 01:04:41.640] Well, I was wanting you guys to weigh in on the declaration letting the judge know that [01:04:41.640 --> 01:04:50.600] the defendant did not follow his order to the letter. He was very specific about following [01:04:50.600 --> 01:04:58.280] his orders to the letter. So filing a motion or request for sanctions [01:04:58.280 --> 01:05:07.000] against the opposing counsel. That would be exciting. Along with a judicial [01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:12.560] notice that the paperwork submitted was non-compliant with the judge's order. [01:05:12.560 --> 01:05:27.400] There is a bar agreement to that, a bar association standard. Do you know what is offhand, Brett? [01:05:27.400 --> 01:05:33.200] There's a rule for the attorney to follow? Yeah, there's a bar standard. [01:05:33.200 --> 01:05:39.120] That says what? That if the prosecutor doesn't follow the [01:05:39.120 --> 01:05:47.640] orders of the court, it's in the area of malpractice. I haven't seen that one. I haven't called [01:05:47.640 --> 01:05:54.040] it out as one that I consider common. I remember addressing that. I just don't [01:05:54.040 --> 01:06:00.600] remember exactly where. Well, the difference is here that these defendants [01:06:00.600 --> 01:06:10.720] are now pro se. They've gone through six attorneys. They are currently pro se in this arena unless [01:06:10.720 --> 01:06:17.120] they find an attorney, which so far they said they've interviewed 40 and nobody will take [01:06:17.120 --> 01:06:25.640] it on except one who wanted $25,000 retainer up front, which they claim they don't have. [01:06:25.640 --> 01:06:33.280] So her past experiences with attorneys, all of them with going for failure to comply with [01:06:33.280 --> 01:06:40.000] contractual obligations, which basically says she didn't pay us. And one of them said she [01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:46.520] ignores our advice and refuses to comply. So they're both currently pro se. So we [01:06:46.520 --> 01:06:51.600] can't file a complaint. The judge is really on top of it. So I'm thinking just letting [01:06:51.600 --> 01:06:57.160] him know, hey, she didn't follow your orders. Let's just, you do what you want to do because [01:06:57.160 --> 01:07:04.160] he did indicate that he was having no more games. We were going to follow his orders [01:07:04.160 --> 01:07:10.400] or else. So I think just letting him know that she didn't follow his orders is sufficient [01:07:10.400 --> 01:07:17.640] to incur his wrath. And taking a picture of maybe the envelope, which doesn't say signature [01:07:17.640 --> 01:07:18.640] required. [01:07:18.640 --> 01:07:28.920] Well, if you want some pictures that are good, I can Photoshop some for you. Do you have [01:07:28.920 --> 01:07:34.240] any pictures of you weighing 360 pounds naked? [01:07:34.240 --> 01:07:45.760] No, that would be it. I can do that for you. I'm sure you could. But while you could do [01:07:45.760 --> 01:07:51.760] that, you still haven't provided me with a copy of that complaint regarding Mnuchin so [01:07:51.760 --> 01:07:58.600] that I can turn it into a generic one for everyone to do. I've sent you three emails. [01:07:58.600 --> 01:08:04.720] You're ignoring me and you're very churlish and I'm very upset. Oh my goodness. Okay. [01:08:04.720 --> 01:08:13.600] I am opening my mail server right now and I will send you those documents as we speak. [01:08:13.600 --> 01:08:14.600] Yes. [01:08:14.600 --> 01:08:19.400] Except I'm not good at multitasking. [01:08:19.400 --> 01:08:26.000] You may be usurped as the radio. I was on talk radio here in San Luis the other day [01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:31.560] with somebody who's been on a talk radio show host for 30 years. Turns out he was my professor [01:08:31.560 --> 01:08:37.920] back in 1987. And he kept teasing me because I forgot his name, but he didn't forget me. [01:08:37.920 --> 01:08:38.920] Interesting. [01:08:38.920 --> 01:08:48.040] So does he also speak with a strange foreign accent? [01:08:48.040 --> 01:08:56.640] Oh no, no, he's American. But I told him that's probably why he remembered me because I spoke [01:08:56.640 --> 01:09:01.560] funny and he had to remember someone who spoke funny in a speech communication class. [01:09:01.560 --> 01:09:05.560] Oh, so you weren't his student when you were in England. [01:09:05.560 --> 01:09:10.680] No, I was a student here in California in 1987. [01:09:10.680 --> 01:09:24.800] Oh, okay. I am digging through my archives to find the Mnuchin documents and you wanna [01:09:24.800 --> 01:09:31.640] see the complaints I filed against the district attorney for not acting on the complaints [01:09:31.640 --> 01:09:33.560] against Mnuchin? [01:09:33.560 --> 01:09:40.040] That's correct because I wanted to turn it into a generic one. Brett had said turn it [01:09:40.040 --> 01:09:47.080] into instead of your name or my put affiant or the undersigned and then anybody can take [01:09:47.080 --> 01:09:55.160] that and can file it so that they might get 10, 12, 15 identical complaints and then they [01:09:55.160 --> 01:10:00.920] might have to just do something because they're getting a lot of flak. [01:10:00.920 --> 01:10:10.640] Okay, I am sending you the documents right now. [01:10:10.640 --> 01:10:15.920] Okay, I'm gonna check my email to make sure and if it's not there, I'll come back at [01:10:15.920 --> 01:10:18.840] the end of the hour and let you know. [01:10:18.840 --> 01:10:21.000] And you'll be churlish. [01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:23.400] I will be very churlish. [01:10:23.400 --> 01:10:31.360] Okay, I've sent criminal complaints against Drummond, Garza, Price. I've got one here [01:10:31.360 --> 01:10:36.440] Texas Ranger Docs. I may have put a complaint to the Texas Ranger but I don't think I've [01:10:36.440 --> 01:10:40.000] sent that one. But you'll find a bunch of stuff in there. [01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:44.600] Okay, and I did send you, I hope you guys got it, I sent it to both of you, the one [01:10:44.600 --> 01:10:53.080] on the attorney going against the judges in Florida. The one who said he has a first amendment [01:10:53.080 --> 01:11:01.520] right to attack the judges but it was a State Bar versus Bruce Jacobs. [01:11:01.520 --> 01:11:07.960] Okay, I don't think I saw that one. I think I hurried about it but I don't believe I [01:11:07.960 --> 01:11:08.960] saw it. [01:11:08.960 --> 01:11:13.080] I sent it to you yesterday but I can resend it if you want. [01:11:13.080 --> 01:11:16.520] Okay, I will probably have it. [01:11:16.520 --> 01:11:21.040] You don't need to resend it to me. I saw it was there yesterday. I haven't gotten into [01:11:21.040 --> 01:11:23.400] it yet but I saw it was there. [01:11:23.400 --> 01:11:28.880] Okay, there. I'm having a little trouble. My server is slowing down sending you all [01:11:28.880 --> 01:11:34.200] these documents. Okay, what was this woman's name again? [01:11:34.200 --> 01:11:40.200] The Florida State Bar versus Bruce Jacobs. [01:11:40.200 --> 01:11:47.360] Jacobs, I don't remember that one. I'll have to look that up. [01:11:47.360 --> 01:11:53.080] Yeah, just look at it and then I'll let you go and get to some more callers. Anyway, [01:11:53.080 --> 01:11:57.160] I'm going to file my declaration and I'm going to let this judge know that this person, [01:11:57.160 --> 01:12:02.280] she has not learned yet that every time she does something, I file a declaration with [01:12:02.280 --> 01:12:09.080] the court to let the judge know what's going on. She must be stupid. I've done it every [01:12:09.080 --> 01:12:11.640] time and she hasn't learned yet. [01:12:11.640 --> 01:12:18.000] Well, you need someone who can take her to task for stupid. Like a- [01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:21.000] Well, this judge can take her to task. [01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:22.000] Yeah, good. [01:12:22.000 --> 01:12:27.200] Anyway, I'll get off and let you talk to someone else. Thanks. [01:12:27.200 --> 01:12:34.280] Okay, thank you, Tina. Now we're going to go to Dan in Connecticut. Hello, Dan. [01:12:34.280 --> 01:12:41.040] Hey, how's it going? I heard a foreclosure story and it reminded me of a war story that [01:12:41.040 --> 01:12:47.640] I had myself and I'll keep it brief because I have way too much fun. Years ago, my aunt [01:12:47.640 --> 01:12:54.280] had died, but she died without a will and she left the condo. What ended up happening [01:12:54.280 --> 01:13:00.760] was my grandfather, because of the laws of intestate succession, turns out he inherited [01:13:00.760 --> 01:13:08.480] the condo. However, because of some condo association lawyers messed up, they automatically [01:13:08.480 --> 01:13:14.760] assumed that my sister and I had actually inherited the condo and we actually didn't. [01:13:14.760 --> 01:13:21.800] So the condo association lawyer went after me and my sister for the fees and the foreclosure [01:13:21.800 --> 01:13:28.520] firm that was actually going after the condo ended up suing me for foreclosure for a condo [01:13:28.520 --> 01:13:36.320] that I never owned. And you wouldn't believe what happened, Randy. I had so much fun with [01:13:36.320 --> 01:13:44.400] them. The condo association's lawyer, it turns out, had done a bill and they billed both [01:13:44.400 --> 01:13:50.120] of us $500 for a title search. And I'm just talking to one of my attorney buddies and [01:13:50.120 --> 01:13:53.720] going, you know, would you like to make some beer money? You represent my sister, I'll [01:13:53.720 --> 01:14:00.160] represent me. We'll just tag team them. We each got a check. My sister got a check and [01:14:00.160 --> 01:14:06.300] I got a check. And then the foreclosure firm, of course, not quite picking up that I wasn't [01:14:06.300 --> 01:14:12.520] your average pro se from hell, they decided to foreclose on me. So when I confronted them [01:14:12.520 --> 01:14:17.240] in front of the court that, you know, maybe they screwed up, they said, well, first I [01:14:17.240 --> 01:14:23.980] have to disinherit it. And I said, no, I cannot disinherit what I have not yet actually inherited. [01:14:23.980 --> 01:14:29.960] And so I did a motion to dismiss. So here's the unfortunate part. They in front of a judge [01:14:29.960 --> 01:14:35.520] were actually trying to say that my deceased aunt was my deceased mother. You know what [01:14:35.520 --> 01:14:38.720] happened? I got a check. [01:14:38.720 --> 01:14:47.600] So the point of the story is when you're, when you're dealing with foreclosures and [01:14:47.600 --> 01:14:53.360] all sorts of stuff like that, a lot of these firms, they, they really don't pay attention. [01:14:53.360 --> 01:14:59.080] I think right now my record for keeping someone in a house without paying the mortgages, I [01:14:59.080 --> 01:15:04.560] don't know, 13 years, I believe in still counting. And I think there was another, the monetary [01:15:04.560 --> 01:15:10.120] record that guy was in his house for 10 years. And I think the bank paid him 30 grand to [01:15:10.120 --> 01:15:12.520] not sue them. [01:15:12.520 --> 01:15:19.160] So more of a story is generally these guys are pretty dumb. So make sure they cross their [01:15:19.160 --> 01:15:24.920] eyes and dots or T's and, oh yeah. So it's, it's, it's great. Big fun. [01:15:24.920 --> 01:15:29.840] Wow. Way to go. It's pretty cool. [01:15:29.840 --> 01:15:36.440] But yeah, it just reminded me of that story. I figured everyone would kind of get a chuckle [01:15:36.440 --> 01:15:41.520] out of that. And who knew that my deceased aunt was my deceased mother. Oh, oh wait. [01:15:41.520 --> 01:15:47.400] I almost forgot the best part about it. So the judge was basically trying to, I think [01:15:47.400 --> 01:15:52.560] for lack of a better term, white people that there's normally in front of a regular judge [01:15:52.560 --> 01:15:58.000] when an attorney is lying like that, the judge would automatically refer him for a bar grievance. [01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:02.520] So this particular judge was trying to pretend, Oh no, this guy's got no legal training. I [01:16:02.520 --> 01:16:09.720] mean, I, you know, I mean, the case did end up going my way, but so it turns out fast [01:16:09.720 --> 01:16:15.640] forward years later, this particular judge that tried to cover up for that firm in my [01:16:15.640 --> 01:16:22.240] case, she was actually the subject of a show cause order from the Connecticut Supreme court [01:16:22.240 --> 01:16:27.320] targeting her for removal from the bench for not actually doing her job as a judge for [01:16:27.320 --> 01:16:34.480] the last two and a half years. Wow. So, um, I guess the other moral of the story is sometimes [01:16:34.480 --> 01:16:41.480] the good guys win and the bad people get what they deserve. [01:16:41.480 --> 01:16:53.600] Randy, are you there? You're going to jump off the cliff? I think you did, but I'll leave [01:16:53.600 --> 01:17:02.360] you to it. Okay. We'll be right back. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with [01:17:02.360 --> 01:17:07.760] phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears [01:17:07.760 --> 01:17:12.840] proven method. Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors. [01:17:12.840 --> 01:17:17.920] And now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win [01:17:17.920 --> 01:17:23.480] in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone mail or [01:17:23.480 --> 01:17:28.000] court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your [01:17:28.000 --> 01:17:33.760] credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:17:33.760 --> 01:17:38.880] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal [01:17:38.880 --> 01:17:44.280] consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com [01:17:44.280 --> 01:17:49.560] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's [01:17:49.560 --> 01:17:59.080] ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors [01:17:59.080 --> 01:18:04.560] now. I love Logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [01:18:04.560 --> 01:18:08.760] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fixed. I'd [01:18:08.760 --> 01:18:13.680] be lost without Logos. And I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love [01:18:13.680 --> 01:18:17.320] to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any [01:18:17.320 --> 01:18:24.000] money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help Logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. [01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:28.280] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos. You can order your supplies [01:18:28.280 --> 01:18:34.000] or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:40.000] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon, [01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:45.760] you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do anything [01:18:45.760 --> 01:18:52.320] different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow, giving without [01:18:52.320 --> 01:18:58.680] doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are welcome. [01:18:58.680 --> 01:19:27.600] Happy holidays, Logos. [01:19:29.560 --> 01:19:41.280] Okay. Howdy, howdy. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue Blah Radio, and we're going to Batista. [01:19:41.280 --> 01:19:53.080] If you're in 602 area code, talk to us. Looks like a first time caller. Well, maybe we lost [01:19:53.080 --> 01:19:59.920] them. Okay. Well, if we have time, we'll come back to you. Now we're going to another what [01:19:59.920 --> 01:20:11.560] appears to be a first time caller. If you are in the 432 area code, talk to us. Hello. [01:20:11.560 --> 01:20:25.840] Give me a first name and a state. Well, I actually called before I'm the rebel. He called [01:20:25.840 --> 01:20:35.400] me rebel. It's certainly not my name. I'm the rebel as everyone, everyone with any sanity [01:20:35.400 --> 01:20:43.960] in this country should be a rebel. I guess that's more precise. I'm a rebel. I hope I'm [01:20:43.960 --> 01:20:54.980] not. I hope I'm not. Okay. I'm confused. I was very disappointed. What happened? Okay. [01:20:54.980 --> 01:21:04.160] What happened was I was disappointed in you guys, but no, I don't recall an 11th commandment [01:21:04.160 --> 01:21:15.200] thou shalt not complain, or thou shalt not offer constructive criticism. Here's the [01:21:15.200 --> 01:21:31.920] deal. A man's life is in jeopardy. And I'll give you a quick review. If anybody's listening, [01:21:31.920 --> 01:21:44.840] no situation. Here's the deal. A man in a neighborhood in a city here in Texas in a [01:21:44.840 --> 01:21:59.040] typical house, a young man, a young boy, 16, driving around the neighborhood in an ATV [01:21:59.040 --> 01:22:05.280] and he encountered the lad and he flagged him and he would not. Wait, wait, wait, wait, [01:22:05.280 --> 01:22:12.120] wait. You're using way too many pronouns. He, he, he, who is he? He encountered a young [01:22:12.120 --> 01:22:22.800] man. The man encountered the young man on an ATV. Wait, wait, wait, wait. The man. Okay. [01:22:22.800 --> 01:22:28.520] Someone encountered a young man on an ATV. I think he's not a policeman or anything like [01:22:28.520 --> 01:22:39.560] that. No, no, no. It's a common man in a neighborhood and a young boy running around the neighborhood [01:22:39.560 --> 01:22:53.960] in an ATV, which is of course not safe and not legal. Okay, move along. You're taking [01:22:53.960 --> 01:23:01.520] a long time. Is this the one about the, the somebody went over into somebody else's yard [01:23:01.520 --> 01:23:06.720] and then the father chased back and went and somebody shot some of each other on somebody's [01:23:06.720 --> 01:23:12.720] property? I can tell you, I can tell you, I can tell you. Is that the story? Yeah, exactly [01:23:12.720 --> 01:23:25.360] what happened. He, he returned to his house and the dad was angry and his son was 16 was [01:23:25.360 --> 01:23:36.880] with him in the pickup truck and they drove over to the man's house who had tried to flag [01:23:36.880 --> 01:23:43.480] down the young boy and he wouldn't talk to him. And the man was in his yard, watering [01:23:43.480 --> 01:23:54.200] his yard and the boy and his dad who was angry at the encounter or the lack of encounter [01:23:54.200 --> 01:24:02.160] and he drove up to the house and got out of his pickup and ran towards him and this guy [01:24:02.160 --> 01:24:11.200] killed him. He's standing in the yard with a friend, a neighbor and water in his yard [01:24:11.200 --> 01:24:16.000] and the guy pulls up in his pickup with his boy. Okay, okay. You're going over the same [01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:22.280] things over and over. You're not getting to the point. The guy killed the fellow who ran [01:24:22.280 --> 01:24:31.400] into his yard. What'd he kill him with? Killed him with a pistol, a semi-automatic pistol. [01:24:31.400 --> 01:24:36.560] The guy was in his yard, water in his yard and the guy pulls up in a pickup, gets out [01:24:36.560 --> 01:24:42.280] of the pickup and runs toward him. Okay, hold on. Was the yard, did it have any kind of [01:24:42.280 --> 01:24:51.520] fence around it? No, it was front yard. So there was no barrier. No. Marking where the [01:24:51.520 --> 01:24:57.740] guy could go and not go. No, there's a typical driveway. Okay, okay. So, so he shot someone [01:24:57.740 --> 01:25:02.880] he felt like was attacking him on his own property. Okay, let's go on to next. Is this [01:25:02.880 --> 01:25:05.680] the guy that's being prosecuted? [01:25:05.680 --> 01:25:17.660] Yes, and I'm thinking he was, well, he's sent to prison. And I'm just curious, the reason [01:25:17.660 --> 01:25:28.200] I'm calling is I'm thinking that this man had a right to defend himself and that someone [01:25:28.200 --> 01:25:38.480] running at you, you know, if you know martial arts, or even if you don't, your life is in [01:25:38.480 --> 01:25:40.840] jeopardy. Some people don't- [01:25:40.840 --> 01:25:47.040] Okay, wait, wait. I got all that, but you have taken a long time to give us just a couple [01:25:47.040 --> 01:25:57.760] of details. Where are you going? So your question is, was the person in the right shooting this [01:25:57.760 --> 01:26:00.800] person? How many times did you shoot him? [01:26:00.800 --> 01:26:02.840] One. [01:26:02.840 --> 01:26:12.040] So on the surface from what you've told, it appears as though the guy was within his rights [01:26:12.040 --> 01:26:16.340] to protect his property and his person and the right to use force and the right to use [01:26:16.340 --> 01:26:17.340] deadly force. [01:26:17.340 --> 01:26:20.520] But he's in prison. [01:26:20.520 --> 01:26:26.600] Okay, so what was put, was he tried before a jury? [01:26:26.600 --> 01:26:31.040] Yeah, what facts were brought up? There must be more than that. [01:26:31.040 --> 01:26:37.680] Yeah, one I wanna get to, did he take a deal? Did he go to court? Was he adjudicated by [01:26:37.680 --> 01:26:43.640] a court or a jury? How did he get in prison? [01:26:43.640 --> 01:26:54.640] Okay, well, that's the discussion we had before, and that's all there is to it. Now, my thought- [01:26:54.640 --> 01:27:00.240] No, no, no, that is not all there is to it. I guarantee you, we're not getting all the [01:27:00.240 --> 01:27:09.240] information. In Texas, the law is clear. You have the right to protect your property and [01:27:09.240 --> 01:27:14.720] your person. You have no duty to withdraw. If you are not the aggressor, you have no [01:27:14.720 --> 01:27:17.080] duty to withdraw. [01:27:17.080 --> 01:27:20.920] Something else is going on here. We're not getting all the facts. [01:27:20.920 --> 01:27:29.080] Well, you are getting all the facts, and that's why I'm calling, because there's a big problem [01:27:29.080 --> 01:27:30.080] here. [01:27:30.080 --> 01:27:36.920] Okay, what was presented to the jury? [01:27:36.920 --> 01:27:40.120] My understanding is- [01:27:40.120 --> 01:27:41.120] Do you have the record? [01:27:41.120 --> 01:27:42.120] Of course. [01:27:42.120 --> 01:27:43.120] The actual reporter? [01:27:43.120 --> 01:27:57.520] Have you read the court file? What motions or pleadings were filed? [01:27:57.520 --> 01:28:01.280] Because it wouldn't do much good to just say, my understanding is, you'd have to be able [01:28:01.280 --> 01:28:09.160] to reference, is it there or is it not there, in a definitive kind of way? [01:28:09.160 --> 01:28:17.200] Let me explain. I get these kinds of arguments, issues. Brett gets these kinds of issues all [01:28:17.200 --> 01:28:18.200] the time. [01:28:18.200 --> 01:28:24.760] If it's not a real case, a hypothetical case, you agree with me then that there's a definite [01:28:24.760 --> 01:28:37.040] right of appeal, to make an appeal on this case. Just assuming that the situation that [01:28:37.040 --> 01:28:39.880] I was presented forgets and- [01:28:39.880 --> 01:28:44.000] Wait a minute, wait a minute. Now you've shifted another gear. [01:28:44.000 --> 01:28:49.600] Well, if it was another situation just like that, that I presented, then there's a right [01:28:49.600 --> 01:28:52.320] to appeal, and that is the case. [01:28:52.320 --> 01:29:00.640] Has he been denied the right to appeal? [01:29:00.640 --> 01:29:09.080] What has happened is that he's a friend of a friend, and my understanding is that he [01:29:09.080 --> 01:29:19.160] went into a depression and he can't even hardly think straight. And now he's in prison where [01:29:19.160 --> 01:29:30.480] he's being abused and subject to the turmoil of prison. [01:29:30.480 --> 01:29:34.120] What do you want from us? What are you asking? [01:29:34.120 --> 01:29:38.280] Does he have a right to appeal? [01:29:38.280 --> 01:29:41.400] I don't know the facts of the case. I don't know if he did appeal. I don't know if he [01:29:41.400 --> 01:29:43.080] preserved his right to appeal. [01:29:43.080 --> 01:29:50.640] Well, if there was a hypothetical case, as I presented it, would that hypothetical man [01:29:50.640 --> 01:29:51.640] have- [01:29:51.640 --> 01:29:59.000] Hypothetically, you will always have a right to appeal if you have preserved the issue. [01:29:59.000 --> 01:30:00.000] If you have- [01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:06.800] A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America. If you build an electrical smart [01:30:06.800 --> 01:30:11.120] grid, the hackers will come, and they could cause a catastrophic blackout. [01:30:11.120 --> 01:30:16.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment. [01:30:16.320 --> 01:30:20.600] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it [01:30:20.600 --> 01:30:25.720] back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish [01:30:25.720 --> 01:30:32.880] too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, [01:30:32.880 --> 01:30:38.200] it's worth hanging onto. This message is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search [01:30:38.200 --> 01:30:45.880] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. [01:30:45.880 --> 01:30:49.800] Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into [01:30:49.800 --> 01:30:54.940] your home, too, with a smart grid. So they're installing a national network of smart meters [01:30:54.940 --> 01:31:00.540] to remotely monitor electric use for efficiency and avoid grid failure. But cybersecurity [01:31:00.540 --> 01:31:05.520] expert David Chalk says not so fast. If we make the national power grid controllable through [01:31:05.520 --> 01:31:11.000] the web, hackers will have a field day. Working remotely, they could tap in and black out [01:31:11.000 --> 01:31:16.560] the entire nation, leaving us vulnerable to our enemies. I've long opposed smart meters [01:31:16.560 --> 01:31:22.080] for privacy and health reasons. The catastrophic failures caused by hackers? There's nothing [01:31:22.080 --> 01:31:23.440] smart about that. [01:31:23.440 --> 01:31:31.360] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:31.360 --> 01:31:36.720] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. [01:31:36.720 --> 01:31:42.160] The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded [01:31:42.160 --> 01:31:46.200] it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their [01:31:46.200 --> 01:31:50.640] lives. And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.640 --> 01:31:53.840] I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force [01:31:53.840 --> 01:31:58.800] pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to [01:31:58.800 --> 01:32:02.800] RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:02.800 --> 01:32:06.760] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. In today's America, [01:32:06.760 --> 01:32:09.680] we live in an us-against-them society. And if we, the people, are ever going to have [01:32:09.680 --> 01:32:13.760] a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those [01:32:13.760 --> 01:32:16.960] rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own [01:32:16.960 --> 01:32:20.920] private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts [01:32:20.920 --> 01:32:24.960] afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights [01:32:24.960 --> 01:32:29.120] through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law [01:32:29.120 --> 01:32:32.280] Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you [01:32:32.280 --> 01:32:36.320] understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get [01:32:36.320 --> 01:32:40.400] your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering [01:32:40.400 --> 01:32:44.360] your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation [01:32:44.360 --> 01:32:48.960] Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of [01:32:48.960 --> 01:32:52.480] research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights [01:32:52.480 --> 01:32:57.120] with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, and together we can [01:32:57.120 --> 01:33:25.680] have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:33:27.120 --> 01:33:34.120] We use it against the workers of iniquity. Tools and mass of capability. Failure of all [01:33:34.120 --> 01:33:43.120] of eternity. They come from natural divinity. With steadfast roots in authenticity. As the [01:33:43.120 --> 01:33:52.120] tools to regain dignity. Rebuild the crime divinity. And I say, truth in nature must [01:33:52.120 --> 01:34:04.120] be justice, I believe. Truth in nature must be justice. And love is a daunting task. At [01:34:04.120 --> 01:34:11.120] least I got the decency to ask them all to just take off their silly masks. And in the [01:34:11.120 --> 01:34:17.120] light of day we all will pass. And they'll be tools of ingenuity. We use it against the [01:34:17.120 --> 01:34:25.120] workers of iniquity. Tools of ingenuity. We use it against the workers of iniquity. [01:34:25.120 --> 01:34:34.400] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rhett Fountain, ruleoflawradio. And I have no idea what you're [01:34:34.400 --> 01:34:41.680] talking about. So let's try this again. Can you start at the beginning and use no pronouns? [01:34:41.680 --> 01:34:48.680] Give each person a designation. Person in the first part, person in the second part, [01:34:48.680 --> 01:34:52.800] whatever. Give them something specific so we know who you're talking about. We didn't [01:34:52.800 --> 01:34:53.800] wear. [01:34:53.800 --> 01:34:54.800] The shooter. [01:34:54.800 --> 01:34:55.800] We're calling him. [01:34:55.800 --> 01:34:56.800] The runner. [01:34:56.800 --> 01:35:00.680] We're calling him Cliff. Yeah, we're calling him Cliff. Boy and dad. [01:35:00.680 --> 01:35:01.680] Okay. [01:35:01.680 --> 01:35:07.080] Okay. The dad is the father of the boy. [01:35:07.080 --> 01:35:13.680] Okay, so boy is riding the four-wheeler. In the neighborhood. In the neighborhood he rides [01:35:13.680 --> 01:35:16.680] an ATV around. [01:35:16.680 --> 01:35:26.160] And did he drive the, did the boy drive the ATV in such a way that he annoyed someone [01:35:26.160 --> 01:35:27.160] else? Cliff. [01:35:27.160 --> 01:35:31.800] In the neighborhood. Yeah, the neighborhood. The neighbors. [01:35:31.800 --> 01:35:39.240] Okay, he annoyed Cliff. What did Cliff do? [01:35:39.240 --> 01:35:45.720] He flagged the boy down, but the boy wouldn't talk to him. [01:35:45.720 --> 01:35:46.720] Okay. [01:35:46.720 --> 01:35:47.720] Okay. [01:35:47.720 --> 01:35:56.080] So he followed him to his house. And found out where he lived. [01:35:56.080 --> 01:36:03.680] Cliff followed the boy to the boy's house? Yes, to the dad's house where the boy lived [01:36:03.680 --> 01:36:06.680] with his dad. [01:36:06.680 --> 01:36:10.160] Then what did, what did Cliff do then? [01:36:10.160 --> 01:36:14.240] He went home. [01:36:14.240 --> 01:36:18.520] So he just followed him to his house and then went home. [01:36:18.520 --> 01:36:23.240] Cliff did not attempt to have a conversation with the dad? [01:36:23.240 --> 01:36:31.880] No, and that's, that's, that's the comment I made when I called you last time. I thought [01:36:31.880 --> 01:36:39.920] if it was me, I wouldn't be afraid of the guy or whatever. I would just go talk to him [01:36:39.920 --> 01:36:45.320] and say, Hey, hey, you know, everybody's getting disturbed by your son, you know, and we should [01:36:45.320 --> 01:36:46.320] quit that. [01:36:46.320 --> 01:36:48.840] I've tried to do that before. [01:36:48.840 --> 01:36:51.920] Let me tell you about our experience here. [01:36:51.920 --> 01:37:03.640] When you're talking to Cliff, keep in mind, people never tell you everything. They tell [01:37:03.640 --> 01:37:09.560] you the part that sounds good for them. They tend not to tell you the part that doesn't [01:37:09.560 --> 01:37:12.000] sound good for them. [01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:19.880] This guy is upset at a kid on a four wheeler, tries to talk to him. The kid goes home, won't [01:37:19.880 --> 01:37:24.200] talk to him, goes home. The guy follows him to his house, finds out where he lives and [01:37:24.200 --> 01:37:30.960] comes back. And then the father comes back angry and runs up in the yard to attack him [01:37:30.960 --> 01:37:37.400] and he shoots him. You know, those pieces don't fit together. [01:37:37.400 --> 01:37:42.040] Something more is going on in there that didn't get told. [01:37:42.040 --> 01:37:44.200] Somebody's not telling us everything. [01:37:44.200 --> 01:37:52.880] Unbelievable, but it's really that simple. So you're saying that a jury convicted this [01:37:52.880 --> 01:38:03.400] guy and put him in prison in the face of all the facts and all of the law. Doesn't fit. [01:38:03.400 --> 01:38:08.480] How do you get a jury of 12 people to ignore all the facts and all and just throw this [01:38:08.480 --> 01:38:20.120] guy in jail? There's stuff we're not hearing. Were you there by chance to see Cliff do this? [01:38:20.120 --> 01:38:33.600] No, no, no. I was, I'm not. My interest is that a fellow Texan has been convicted of [01:38:33.600 --> 01:38:43.360] something that seems to be outrageous in his own yard. [01:38:43.360 --> 01:38:51.840] We've been doing this show a long time and we constantly get stories of really outrageous [01:38:51.840 --> 01:39:00.280] stuff and a lot of times they pan out. But generally when we have stories between citizens, [01:39:00.280 --> 01:39:05.640] someone's going after the government or the government's coming after somebody, we get [01:39:05.640 --> 01:39:11.960] really horrendous stories and they tend to pan out. [01:39:11.960 --> 01:39:20.360] But when we get ordinary people upset with other ordinary people, the justice system [01:39:20.360 --> 01:39:28.360] itself doesn't really have much of a dog in that hunt. And those tend to be more based [01:39:28.360 --> 01:39:34.840] on facts and law. And when something sounds horribly outrageous, when we look deeper it [01:39:34.840 --> 01:39:38.800] turns out not to be quite so outrageous. [01:39:38.800 --> 01:39:43.720] Friend of mine came to me, a preacher was ministering to people in the jail and wanted [01:39:43.720 --> 01:39:52.080] me to help this poor couple get their children back. Because CPS was trying to steal their [01:39:52.080 --> 01:39:59.800] children and sell them into child pornography or some stuff. And I told Ken, go tell that [01:39:59.800 --> 01:40:06.520] preacher that before he gets too excited, go talk to Child Protective Services and see [01:40:06.520 --> 01:40:09.400] why they're trying to take these kids. [01:40:09.400 --> 01:40:16.280] Well, it turned out Child Protective Services went to the house to check on the kids and [01:40:16.280 --> 01:40:20.580] the two kids were in diapers. It looked like they'd been in two or three days. Their diapers [01:40:20.580 --> 01:40:25.780] were dirty. It was a two year old and a three year old. They were filthy. They hadn't eaten. [01:40:25.780 --> 01:40:31.000] The parents are passed out drunk, drunk on drugs. [01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:36.800] So we didn't get that story. And Ken came back to me and said, well, maybe you're not [01:40:36.800 --> 01:40:45.720] as stupid as you sound. That maybe there was more to this story. I'm suggesting to you, [01:40:45.720 --> 01:40:50.720] you're not getting the whole story. [01:40:50.720 --> 01:40:55.680] Yeah, a lot of people are going crazy. I thought I was going crazy because if you just presented [01:40:55.680 --> 01:41:00.880] it as a hypothetical where a man was in his yard, all you knew- [01:41:00.880 --> 01:41:06.120] Okay, you don't have to go through all that again. We get it. If I'm on my property and [01:41:06.120 --> 01:41:11.440] someone attacks me, I have the right to shoot him. That's absolutely clear, unquestionable [01:41:11.440 --> 01:41:12.440] in law. [01:41:12.440 --> 01:41:20.480] Okay. In Texas, not in other states, but in Texas, that is absolutely clear. A guy chases [01:41:20.480 --> 01:41:26.440] his girlfriend down the street, down the mall at Highland Park, shoots you in the back of [01:41:26.440 --> 01:41:32.040] the head, jumps in his car, drives away and somebody blew out his femoral artery right [01:41:32.040 --> 01:41:38.920] through the car door with a.44 Magnum. The police asked for two weeks for whoever did [01:41:38.920 --> 01:41:43.200] that to come in. Finally, the Xerox salesman shows up. [01:41:43.200 --> 01:41:44.640] Oh yeah? [01:41:44.640 --> 01:41:48.520] They checked the gun. Yep, that's the one that killed him, all right. Gave him back [01:41:48.520 --> 01:41:50.280] the gun, sent him home. [01:41:50.280 --> 01:41:51.280] Really? [01:41:51.280 --> 01:41:56.840] A guy pulls into his house. He's on a cul-de-sac. He's going down the road to the end of the [01:41:56.840 --> 01:42:02.540] road. He sees a car backed up to his door with two guys on the porch throwing stuff [01:42:02.540 --> 01:42:08.560] in the trunk, another guy in the car. Pulls over, pulls a.30-06 off the gun rack, pops [01:42:08.560 --> 01:42:13.400] the two on the porch, shoots the guy in the car, but don't kill him. The guy runs off [01:42:13.400 --> 01:42:18.760] in a creek. The police come and get him, and he asks him, why aren't you gonna arrest me? [01:42:18.760 --> 01:42:23.640] The policeman said, the only reason we'd arrest you is for not killing that third one. Now [01:42:23.640 --> 01:42:27.880] I got lots of paperwork. Yeah, you have that right in Texas. [01:42:27.880 --> 01:42:30.160] Yes, sir. Well, you know- [01:42:30.160 --> 01:42:34.480] I'm saying something else is going on. You're not getting all the facts. [01:42:34.480 --> 01:42:38.640] For what you're doing. For what you're doing. I love you guys for what you're doing. We're [01:42:38.640 --> 01:42:40.640] in the end. Is it Brett? [01:42:40.640 --> 01:42:41.640] Yeah. [01:42:41.640 --> 01:42:46.880] Or, I didn't understand if it was maybe Brett or Brett. [01:42:46.880 --> 01:42:52.680] Yeah, and let me explain this part. Generally, people, they don't tell you everything, and [01:42:52.680 --> 01:43:01.840] it's not intentional. They want you to be on their side, so they tell the brain, deliver [01:43:01.840 --> 01:43:07.360] me up all the information I need to get this guy to help me out and be on my side. Well, [01:43:07.360 --> 01:43:10.200] the brain just doesn't deliver up the bad stuff. [01:43:10.200 --> 01:43:19.080] I saw this on the news, and the guy was being arrested, and right there on his front porch, [01:43:19.080 --> 01:43:21.560] Cliff will call him Cliff. [01:43:21.560 --> 01:43:29.920] Yeah, well, you got a guy that shot somebody else. They take that real serious. So, yeah, [01:43:29.920 --> 01:43:32.520] come arrest him wherever they find him. [01:43:32.520 --> 01:43:41.520] Well, he was right there. So, as far as being on the guy's property, that part's true. That [01:43:41.520 --> 01:43:43.520] was on the news. [01:43:43.520 --> 01:43:47.880] Okay, I'm going to suggest that there was a lot more argument back and forth going on [01:43:47.880 --> 01:43:51.680] here. Good chance this guy threatened the guy's son. That's why he's so upset. [01:43:51.680 --> 01:43:55.880] Yeah. We don't know if it was set up like entrapment or whatever, but we'll have to [01:43:55.880 --> 01:44:00.600] talk about it more after the sponsors hear about it. [01:44:00.600 --> 01:44:05.200] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [01:44:05.200 --> 01:44:09.920] of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we [01:44:09.920 --> 01:44:16.040] changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment [01:44:16.040 --> 01:44:21.640] is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and [01:44:21.640 --> 01:44:26.960] contaminated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets [01:44:26.960 --> 01:44:32.600] many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust [01:44:32.600 --> 01:44:38.720] Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor, along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, [01:44:38.720 --> 01:44:46.080] and many others. When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [01:44:46.080 --> 01:44:52.000] Quality Radio. As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:44:52.000 --> 01:44:57.240] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [01:44:57.240 --> 01:45:03.440] increase your income. Order now. [01:45:03.440 --> 01:45:09.880] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with JurisDictionary, [01:45:09.880 --> 01:45:16.680] the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:16.680 --> 01:45:23.200] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, [01:45:23.200 --> 01:45:28.520] know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and [01:45:28.520 --> 01:45:35.320] now you can too. JurisDictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning [01:45:35.320 --> 01:45:41.240] experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:41.240 --> 01:45:46.760] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio [01:45:46.760 --> 01:45:53.760] classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much [01:45:53.760 --> 01:46:16.400] more. Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:16.400 --> 01:46:40.560] Thank you very much. [01:46:46.400 --> 01:47:00.680] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain of Rule of Law Radio on this, the last segment [01:47:00.680 --> 01:47:07.800] of our Friday night info marathon. And we're talking to Rebel. Rebel, we need to move on. [01:47:07.800 --> 01:47:12.200] I've got two more callers and one segment to get to them yet. [01:47:12.200 --> 01:47:23.320] Okay, A Rebel. A Rebel. And I'd like to encourage everybody to be a little bit aggravated with [01:47:23.320 --> 01:47:26.200] our government. Thanks a lot, guys. Good night. [01:47:26.200 --> 01:47:34.120] Okay, thank you. Now we're going to go to, if you are in the 602 area code, what I've [01:47:34.120 --> 01:47:40.520] got on my screen is your first name would be By, but I don't want to say that you're [01:47:40.520 --> 01:47:47.920] By on the air. That could start rumors. If you're there, give us a call. It appears as [01:47:47.920 --> 01:47:54.760] though you're not. It's probably the dulcet tones of my voice that has lulled you into [01:47:54.760 --> 01:47:56.160] unconsciousness. [01:47:56.160 --> 01:48:04.800] Okay, now we're going to go to EJ in California. EJ, are you awake? [01:48:04.800 --> 01:48:07.880] Yes, hi. [01:48:07.880 --> 01:48:11.920] Okay, what do you have for us today? [01:48:11.920 --> 01:48:22.480] Yes, so I have a question regarding the summary judgment since I filed it before the 60 day. [01:48:22.480 --> 01:48:28.000] Okay, try something. You're loud in my ears, but I'm having trouble understanding you. [01:48:28.000 --> 01:48:32.280] That generally means I'm losing the high tones. Can you back the microphone away from [01:48:32.280 --> 01:48:33.680] your mouth a little bit? [01:48:33.680 --> 01:48:38.040] Oh, yeah, sure. Is this okay? [01:48:38.040 --> 01:48:45.800] Yes. It's still kind of muffled, but I'll struggle. I'll get Brett to interpret for [01:48:45.800 --> 01:48:46.800] me. [01:48:46.800 --> 01:48:49.320] Should I write it in Braille? [01:48:49.320 --> 01:48:53.120] Okay, go ahead, EJ. [01:48:53.120 --> 01:49:08.160] I filed for summary judgment on March 15th, and that's less than the 60 day requirement [01:49:08.160 --> 01:49:17.200] in the California law for summary judgment. My question is, should I re-file it to the [01:49:17.200 --> 01:49:18.200] Scheister's... [01:49:18.200 --> 01:49:23.200] Wait, Brett, can you understand that? [01:49:23.200 --> 01:49:27.200] I'm not sure yet what the 60 day... There's a 60 day she's wondering about and summary [01:49:27.200 --> 01:49:28.200] judgment and... [01:49:28.200 --> 01:49:34.320] Oh, now I remember. Now I remember. She filed a motion for summary judgment, and apparently [01:49:34.320 --> 01:49:47.440] the code said that you couldn't file for summary judgment until 60 days after your pleading [01:49:47.440 --> 01:49:54.480] was unanswered. Your motion for pleading was unanswered, and she filed before 60 days. [01:49:54.480 --> 01:50:00.880] So what I'm saying is, is that's like the statute of limitations. [01:50:00.880 --> 01:50:05.640] Notice to appeal or anything else is just if somebody complains about it, well, then [01:50:05.640 --> 01:50:07.640] you re-file. [01:50:07.640 --> 01:50:15.840] Exactly. Like statute of limitations, we hear, oh, it's too late for them to act. No, it's [01:50:15.840 --> 01:50:27.280] statute of limitations and is a affirmative defense. It is not a bar. And here, they have [01:50:27.280 --> 01:50:36.040] X number of days to file an answer. So you file an original pleading, and they have until [01:50:36.040 --> 01:50:44.720] the Monday after the 20th day, so technically 21 days. But apparently in your jurisdiction, [01:50:44.720 --> 01:50:52.080] the courts have said, you can't file for summary judgment until 60 days after you have filed [01:50:52.080 --> 01:50:53.080] your petition. [01:50:53.080 --> 01:50:56.520] Since the general appearance... [01:50:56.520 --> 01:51:04.880] However, however, that is only a problem if they make it a problem. About the only thing [01:51:04.880 --> 01:51:15.080] that can't be waived is subject matter jurisdiction. These time limits, they can all be waived [01:51:15.080 --> 01:51:23.320] if you don't raise an issue about it. I can testify to hearsay evidence. Even though it's [01:51:23.320 --> 01:51:35.320] forbidden, I can do that as long as nobody objects. So before you re-file, see if they [01:51:35.320 --> 01:51:39.200] object. If they object, then you re-file. [01:51:39.200 --> 01:51:46.180] Okay, got it. [01:51:46.180 --> 01:51:50.680] You gotta have another question. We got seven more minutes. You can't leave us hanging for [01:51:50.680 --> 01:52:04.280] seven minutes. We won't know what to say, and we'll wind up fighting with each other. [01:52:04.280 --> 01:52:08.960] Don't make me wake my wife up or she'll have some fighting to do with Randy's. [01:52:08.960 --> 01:52:11.280] You mean she might say something contentious? [01:52:11.280 --> 01:52:15.400] Oh, no, she wouldn't know anything about being a contentious woman, but she'll give you [01:52:15.400 --> 01:52:18.840] a hard time for sure if you deserve it. [01:52:18.840 --> 01:52:25.760] That's kind of an inside joke. I had Pastor Bassett call me today to get my recommendation [01:52:25.760 --> 01:52:32.040] or lack thereof of someone who called him, and he said she was bombastic, that she talked [01:52:32.040 --> 01:52:39.440] and talked and talked and talked, and that the Bible says that it's easier to live in [01:52:39.440 --> 01:52:47.160] the corner of an attic, a corner of a leaky attic than in a mansion with a bombastic woman, [01:52:47.160 --> 01:52:57.200] and Brett straightened me out on that. Will you give us the actual proverb on that, Brett? [01:52:57.200 --> 01:53:01.760] Come on, you chicken. Andrew's not listening. [01:53:01.760 --> 01:53:07.320] It says better to live on the corner of the roof than to share a house with a contentious [01:53:07.320 --> 01:53:08.320] woman. [01:53:08.320 --> 01:53:18.200] I'm gonna have to tell that one to my wife. I read the Bible to her on our wedding night [01:53:18.200 --> 01:53:20.200] and she got mad at me. [01:53:20.200 --> 01:53:22.160] I can only imagine. [01:53:22.160 --> 01:53:29.400] Can you believe that? Well, I did read that part about where it said a woman's desire [01:53:29.400 --> 01:53:39.560] shall be unto her husband, and he shall have dominion over thee. That did not go over good, [01:53:39.560 --> 01:53:44.440] but it went over better than the part about a woman's to keep her head covered and her [01:53:44.440 --> 01:53:50.640] mouth shut. [01:53:50.640 --> 01:53:54.840] Did you experience any kind of clubbing around that point? [01:53:54.840 --> 01:54:07.840] Well, I felt like I would be better off in the corner of the attic, but I have to give [01:54:07.840 --> 01:54:18.920] the woman credit. She is incredibly tolerant. She didn't shoot me yet, but that's because [01:54:18.920 --> 01:54:21.440] I don't have any guns in the house. [01:54:21.440 --> 01:54:25.000] She has other plans. [01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:32.400] Okay. Do you have anything else for us, E.J.? [01:54:32.400 --> 01:54:39.840] So the summary judgment has already been filed before the 60 days. [01:54:39.840 --> 01:54:47.040] Okay, wait. Let me take a step back. Summary judgment. Is this summary judgment on an initial [01:54:47.040 --> 01:54:53.680] petition or on a subsequent motion or pleading? [01:54:53.680 --> 01:55:04.560] It was the answer. It was the answer to my complaint. Their first pleading, their general [01:55:04.560 --> 01:55:11.480] appearance, their first pleading that they filed. [01:55:11.480 --> 01:55:15.920] Can you understand her, Britt? I'm not getting the high tones. I'm not understanding. [01:55:15.920 --> 01:55:20.240] I understood her to say it was their answer. It was their first pleading, the original [01:55:20.240 --> 01:55:21.240] answer. [01:55:21.240 --> 01:55:26.760] Okay, that's okay. So this is the original petition. You don't file for summary judgment. [01:55:26.760 --> 01:55:30.160] You file for default judgment. [01:55:30.160 --> 01:55:33.840] Because they did answer. They just didn't have any issues. [01:55:33.840 --> 01:55:41.640] Oh, okay. That's right. Now I remember. They answered, but they did not address the issues [01:55:41.640 --> 01:55:50.520] in your pleading. I suspect you may be reading the statute wrong. If someone files a response [01:55:50.520 --> 01:56:01.960] to a pleading, in any court I've ever seen, if they don't address the issues, you can [01:56:01.960 --> 01:56:05.360] file something immediately. [01:56:05.360 --> 01:56:12.120] It doesn't make sense after they have filed an answer to have to wait 60 days to respond [01:56:12.120 --> 01:56:15.040] to their answer. [01:56:15.040 --> 01:56:21.140] What would make more sense is if the 60 days applies as giving them plenty of time to submit [01:56:21.140 --> 01:56:29.400] an answer before you can ask for the judge to rule on your unopposed document there. [01:56:29.400 --> 01:56:35.680] Yeah, if somebody files a trash pleading, I should be able to object to that the next [01:56:35.680 --> 01:56:43.800] day. Because time makes no difference to the filer. They've already filed it. They're finished. [01:56:43.800 --> 01:56:48.160] So I think you may be missing something. Go ahead. I keep it in a row to you. [01:56:48.160 --> 01:56:58.040] No, I think you should continue with missing something. I mean, 70% it was malpractice [01:56:58.040 --> 01:57:06.880] and that I was an employee there. It looks at the code. It's regarding malpractice [01:57:06.880 --> 01:57:19.560] and subjecting myself to procedures. I was visiting my family member. So 70% it's not [01:57:19.560 --> 01:57:31.320] related to my complaint. 30% is just saying outright, you know, we're the defendant. [01:57:31.320 --> 01:57:38.040] What you're saying is, is that defendants answer is non-responsive. [01:57:38.040 --> 01:57:41.760] That's correct. [01:57:41.760 --> 01:57:49.080] That's the way to address it. It's non-responsive. It has a lot of stuff in it, but none of it [01:57:49.080 --> 01:57:54.360] is responsive to the issues before the court. [01:57:54.360 --> 01:58:01.440] So the 60-day thing, I would not worry about it. If it becomes an issue, if they complain [01:58:01.440 --> 01:58:06.800] about it, you know, it's kind of like verified documents. If you file a document that should [01:58:06.800 --> 01:58:14.120] be verified and it's not, and the other side doesn't complain about it, it's in the record [01:58:14.120 --> 01:58:19.280] as if it was verified. If the other side complains about it, then you have the opportunity to [01:58:19.280 --> 01:58:26.480] fix it. Most things in court are that way. Very few things are hard and fast and sudden [01:58:26.480 --> 01:58:29.520] death. [01:58:29.520 --> 01:58:35.480] So I think you're okay on the 60-day thing. Okay. We are out of time. We're into Kelton [01:58:35.480 --> 01:58:41.640] Brett Fountain Rue La Radio. We'll be back next week. Thank you all for listening and [01:58:41.640 --> 01:58:50.560] good night in about five more seconds. But I didn't fall off the cliff. [01:58:50.560 --> 01:58:56.640] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament [01:58:56.640 --> 01:59:02.080] Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain [01:59:02.080 --> 01:59:07.960] what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of [01:59:07.960 --> 01:59:16.720] life. Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 [01:59:16.720 --> 01:59:23.840] or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over [01:59:23.840 --> 01:59:30.280] 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.280 --> 01:59:34.840] This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament [01:59:34.840 --> 01:59:46.600] Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at [01:59:46.600 --> 02:00:06.600] bfa.org. Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.